alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Steven E. HILL *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 99-1341

13 S.W.3d 142

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered January 27, 2000

*249
      *Petitioner,*pro se.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

Steven E. Hill was found guilty by a jury of murder in the second degree and was sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. The court of appeals affirmed. *Hill v. State,*64 Ark. App. 31, 977 S.W.2d 234 (1998). The mandate of the court of appeals was issued on November 24, 1998. Sixty-five days later, on January 28, 1999, Hill filed in the trial court a motion seeking an extension of time to file a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37. The motion was granted, and Hill filed his petition on February 24, 1999. The petition was denied, and Hill lodged an appeal of the order in this court. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that the petition filed in the trial court was untimely. *Hill v. State,*CR 99-1341 (December 9, 1999). Now before us is appellant Hill’s *pro se*motion seeking to have the appeal reinstated.

As we said when the appeal was dismissed, Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2(c) provides in pertinent part that a petition under the rule is untimely if not filed within sixty days of the date the mandate was issued upon affirmance of the judgment. The mandate in appellant’s case was issued on November 24, 1998, but appellant did not file his petition under the rule until February 24, 1999, which was ninety-two days after the mandate was issued. Appellant argues that it constitutes an injustice for his petition to be considered untimely because he was hampered in various ways in his effort to prepare the petition; and, furthermore, he relied on the fact that the lower court granted his motion for extension of time to file the Rule 37 petition.

Neither argument can excuse the failure to file the petition within the sixty-day period provided in the rule inasmuch as the time limitations imposed in Criminal Procedure Rule 37 are jurisdictional in nature, and a circuit court cannot grant relief on an untimely petition. *Benton v. State,*325 Ark. 246, 925 S.W.2d 401 (1996); *Hamilton v. State,*323 Ark. 614, 918 S.W.2d 113 (1996); *Harris v. State,*318 Ark. 599, 887 S.W.2d 514 (1994); *Maxwell v. State,*298 Ark. 329, 767 S.W.2d 303 (1989). In *Benton v State, supra,*the Rule 37 petition was delivered to the circuit judge who ruled on it, but it was never filed with the circuit clerk. We held that *250filing the petition with the circuit clerk was critical for purposes of establishing jurisdiction. Similarly, in the case before us the Rule 37 petition was not timely filed to establish jurisdiction. Because the time limits set forth in the rule are jurisdictional in nature, a trial court cannot extend the time to file a Rule 37 petition even if a motion for extension of time is filed before the the sixty-day period allowed by Rule 37.2(c) elapses.

Motion denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROSA Z. VASQUEZ DE QUINTERO, AKA Maria Rodriguez de Enriquez,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 20

- 70846 Agency No. A039

- 099

- 987

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 8, 2021 * *
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Rosa Z. Va s quez D e Quintero, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 15 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 70846

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review. Vasquez D e Quintero’s contention that the BIA violated her right to due

process by declining to remand to the IJ for a new adverse credibility
determination fails

. See Padilla

- Martinez v. Holder , 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“To prevail on a due

- process claim, a petition er must demonstrate both a violation of rights and prejudice.”) ; see also Alam v. Garland , 11 F.4th 1133, 113 7 (9th Cir. 2021) (en banc) ( “ in assessing an adverse credibility finding under the [REAL ID] Act, we must look to the ‘ totality of the circumstances[ ] and all
relevant factors. ’

. . . . There is no bright

- line rule under which some number of inconsistencies requires sustaining or rejecting an adverse credibility
determination ” (internal citation omitted) )

. In her opening brief, Vasquez De Quintero does not raise , and has therefore waived , any challenge to the remaining factors relied upon in the BIA’s adverse credibility determination, which are dispositive

. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived)

. Vasquez D e Quintero does not raise , and has therefore also waived , any challenge to the BIA’s denial of deferral of removal under CAT, and the BIA’s
conclusions as to the need for competency proceedings

. See Lopez

- Vasque z , 7063 20

- 70846

F.3d at 1079

- 80

. The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the
mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of ZAIS Financial Corp. (the Company) for the period ended December
31, 2012 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the report), I, Michael Szymanski, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

It is not intended that this statement
be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|Date: March 28, 2013 |     |                       |                                            
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                    
|                     | By: | /s/ Michael Szymanski
|                     |     | Name:                 | Michael Szymanski                          
|                     |     | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer and
      President

- 1 -

---
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Periodic Report of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ended July 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin DeFrank, President
and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Date:  August 14, 2003                          /S/ Geraldine Blecker
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: Geraldine Blecker
                                                Its:  Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 14, 2003                          /S/ H. Martin DeFrank
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: H. Martin DeFrank
                                                Its:  Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 07, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A1649. RAI INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, LLC v. CONCEPT STEEL, INC..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1997 and condensed
consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended December 31, 1997 and
related footnotes and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000771790
<NAME> STEEL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (943)
<INVENTORY>                                     73,381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,532
<PP&E>                                         156,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,107)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,941
<BONDS>                                         92,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,896
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,714
<SALES>                                         96,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,449
<CGS>                                           86,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,988
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1226 PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. RNA CORPORATION,

Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

in case no. 1:08-CV-565, Judge Thomas M. Rose.

ORDER RNA Corporation submits correspondence informing the court that it will not participate in this appeal. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The caption is revised to reflect that RNA Corporation is not an appellee. FOR THE COURT 

# APR 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Peter M. Lancaster, Esq. Frederic A. Mendelsohn, Esq. s17 APR 0 9 2009 dUltbriLY CLERK
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



In connection with
the Amendment No. 1 on the Annual Report of BioPharma Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of the
Company, hereby certify to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



| | /s/ Gary Riccio        
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: April 9, 2014
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven P.
Wyandt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Nitches, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended May
31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Nitches, Inc.

|Date: October 26, 2007           
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|/s/ Steven P. Wyandt             
|                                 
|Steven P.
      Wyandt           
|Chief Executive
      Officer and
|Chief Financial
      Officer    

This certification is furnished pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Nitches, Inc. for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in to any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Nitches, Inc.
specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6749]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MEASURES READ THE FIRST TIME

  The following measure was read the first time:

       H.R. 1045. An act to amend the Goals 2000: Educate America 
     Act to eliminate the National Education Standards and 
     Improvement Council, and for other purposes.
     

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 DOD assessing document disclosures and implementing mitigation measuresPublished April 19, 2023
                        
                        By David Vergun
                        
                        
                        DOD News
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Defense Department continues to actively address the incident involving the unauthorized disclosure of classified documents, said Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh at a news conference April 19.
Massachusetts Air National Guard Airman 1st Class Jack Teixeira, 21, was arrested April 13, by the FBI at his family's residence in Dighton, Massachusetts, in connection with an investigation into alleged unauthorized removal, retention and transmission of classified national defense information.
The department is taking this breach seriously, Singh said. **Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III** and senior Pentagon officials "continue to convene daily meetings to examine the scope and scale of this disclosure, as well as ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are being taken."
In support of this effort, the secretary has formally directed **Ronald S. Moultrie**, undersecretary of defense for intelligence and security, in coordination with John Sherman, chief information officer, and Michael B. Donley, the director of administration and management, to lead a comprehensive review of DOD security, programs, policies and procedures, Singh said.
Within 45 days the secretary will be provided with initial findings and recommendations to improve the department's policies and procedures related to the protection of classified information, she said.
The department is in close contact with the White House, Congress, interagency partners, and allies and partners, she said.
Addressing the media, Singh said: "We'd encourage you to be mindful of how you are reporting and repurposing these images due to the classified nature of this information and the potential impact on national security, as well as the safety and security of our personnel, and those of our allies and partners."
Separately, Singh said the department has publicly acknowledged previously that there is a small U.S. military footprint in Ukraine which is providing mission-critical support to the U.S. embassy and the defense attaché office in support of security assistance programs. This is not new news, she added.
"To be clear, there are no U.S. combat troops conducting combat operations in Ukraine," she said.
On another Ukraine topic, Singh said Austin spoke with Oleksii Reznikov, Ukraine's defense minister today.
Both leaders discussed the security situation in Ukraine and the secretary looks forward to his own meeting later this week at the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, she said.LF 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



DOD 



Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III 



Ronald S. Moultrie 



national security 



security 



programs 



policies and procedures
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 399 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 399

  To protect American job creation by striking the Federal mandate on 
                  employers to offer health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2013

 Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
Blunt, Mr. Burr, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Ms. 
 Collins, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Enzi, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Flake, Mr. Grassley, 
  Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
 Risch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Thune, Mr. Toomey, and Mr. Wicker) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect American job creation by striking the Federal mandate on 
                  employers to offer health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Job Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION.

    Sections 1513 and 1514 and subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 
10106 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (and the 
amendments made by such sections and subsections) are repealed and the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if 
such provisions and amendments had never been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE> 1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
                        ENGINEERED SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC.
               STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                          January 31
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                     1997             1996
                                                 ------------     ------------
<S>                                             <C>              <C>
NET INCOME                                       $    802,831     $    485,828
                                                 ============     ============

NET INCOME PER SHARE

    Average shares outstanding                      3,182,114        2,983,443
                                                 ============     ============

    Net income                                          $ .25            $ .16
                                                 ============     ============

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

    Average shares outstanding                      3,182,114        2,983,443
    Net effect of dilutive stock options <F1>         127,842          230,445
                                                 ------------     ------------
                                                    3,309,956        3,213,888
                                                 ============     ============
    Net income                                          $ .24            $ .15
                                                 ============     ============

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

    Average shares outstanding                      3,182,114        2,983,443

    Net effect of dilutive stock options <F1>         150,881          237,648
                                                 ------------     ------------
                                                    3,332,995        3,221,091
                                                 ============     ============
    Net income                                          $ .24            $ .15
                                                 ============     ============

<FN>
<F1> Based on the treasury stock method
</TABLE>


                                    10
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               MEMORIALS

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII,

       82. The Speaker presented a memorial of the Senate of the 
     State of Hawaii, relative to urging the Congress of the 
     United States to support legislation to safeguard veterans' 
     disability compensation and Social Security disability 
     compensation from elimination, or taxation; to the Committee 
     on Veterans' Affairs.

                          ____________________
```