alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         185,687
<SECURITIES>                                    34,958
<RECEIVABLES>                                  442,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               727,995
<PP&E>                                         552,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,563,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          565,012
<BONDS>                                         12,556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,148
<OTHER-SE>                                     939,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,563,212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,327,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,173,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,973
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6575]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ACT

  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Thomas). The Senate will resume 
consideration of S. 534.
  The clerk will report the bill.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (S. 534) to amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to 
     provide authority for States to limit the interstate 
     transportation of municipal solid waste, and for other 
     purposes.

  Mr. CHAFEE. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 20th Air Force commander relieved of commandPublished Oct. 11, 2013
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                Lt. Gen. James Kowalski, commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, relieved Maj. Gen. Michael Carey from command of 20th Air Force today due to a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership and judgment. 
Kowalski made his decision based on information from an Inspector General investigation into Carey's behavior during a temporary duty assignment. The allegations are not related to operational readiness or the inspection results of any 20th AF unit, nor do they involve sexual misconduct. 
"20th AF continues to execute its mission of around-the-clock nuclear deterrence in a safe, secure and effective manner," Kowalski said. "It's unfortunate that I've had to relieve an officer who's had an otherwise distinctive career spanning 35 years of commendable service."
AFGSC vice commander Maj. Gen. Jack Weinstein has been named the interim 20th AF commander.
Headquartered at F. E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo., 20th AF is responsible for the nation's three intercontinental ballistic missile wings. It has dual responsibilities to AFGSC and U.S. Strategic Command. As the missile Numbered Air Force for AFGSC, 20th AF maintains and operates the nation's ICBM force. Designated as STRATCOM's Task Force 214, the command provides on-alert, combat ready ICBMs to the President.
(Courtesy Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs)20th Air Force 



relieved of command 



Maj. Gen. Michael Carey 



Air Force Global Strike Command Related Links
        LIEUTENANT GENERAL JACK WEINSTEIN
                                Feb. 3, 2016
                                Lt. Gen. Jack Weinstein is Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration, Headquarters U. S. Air Force, Arlington, Va.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Dennis B. Gillings, Ph.D., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quintiles
Transnational Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238
and 34-47986.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):




---



##### 



(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 30, 2004 
 /s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. Gillings, Ph.D.Executive Chairman andChief Executive Officer
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

December 23, 2002


Worldspan, L.P.
300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.
Atlanta, GA  30339

        LETTER AMENDMENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Agreement for CRS Access and
Related Services, dated as of November 1, 2001, as amended by the First
Amendment thereto dated as of December 13, 2002 (the "Agreement")

Orbitz, LLC and Worldspan, L.P. hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

Section 4.7(c) is restated in its entirety to provide as follows:

"(c)    Notwithstanding Sections 4.7(a) and (b), Orbitz shall discontinue all
access, either directly or through ITA, to the Worldspan System with respect to
Supplier Link Segments for American Airlines no later than January 31, 2003 and
with respect to Supplier Link Segments for Continental Airlines no later than
January 1, 2003. In the event Orbitz or ITA, acting at the direction and on
behalf of Orbitz, as the case may be continues to generate DIR INVQ Messages for
American Airlines after January 31, 2003 or Continental Airlines after January
1, 2003, Orbitz shall pay Worldspan a monthly processing fee in accordance with
Table 1 set forth on Schedule E for each month of usage."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of Orbitz, LLC and Worldspan, L.P. has caused this
Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the date
first above written.

ORBITZ, LLC                                              WORLDSPAN, L.P.


By:     /s/: Gary Doernhoefer                     By:    /s/: Howard Kress
        ---------------------                            -----------------

        ---------------------------------                -----------------------
Title:  Vice President and General Counsel        Title: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM NOVA INTERNATIONAL FILMS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE 
QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                7,556
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      7,556
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        7,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,800
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            8,197,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          7,556
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (570)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (570)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .000


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               THE BUDGET

  (Mrs. SCHROEDER asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mrs. SCHROEDER. Mr. Speaker, we have now seen a new kind of socialism 
introduced in this new budget. It is called socialism for the rich. You 
cut the middle class so you can cut the richest's taxes. Yes, everybody 
gets cuts, but there is a big difference between a tax cut that equals 
$20,000 a year for people making over $200,000 a year and the cuts that 
are going to come to the middle class, which means the average family 
is going to be straining to help mom and dad pay the additional 
Medicare costs, the kids paying additional student loan costs, kids 
paying additional school lunch costs.
  I do not think this is fair. I think the polls today show the 
Americans have figured it out. They do not think it is fair either. Let 
us go after some of those pet rocks in the budget that will put this 
budget in balance. We need it in balance, but not on the backs of the 
middle class so the fat cats can get one more tax break.

                          ____________________
```
#### W. R. Fitzpatrick et al. v. William Small.

(No. 1571, Op. Book No. 2, p. 412.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1140. *Jurisdiction of county court; injunction.*The county judge is authorized by the constitution to issue the writ of injunction, when necessary to the enforcement of the jurisdiction of the county court. It has been held in several cases that the county judge has the *645power, and may issue the writ of injunction, in cases tried in justice’s court, when such cases have been appealed or brought to the county court by *certiorari.*This is the utmost limit to which his authority extends in enjoining judgments of a justice of the peace. That is, wherever the county court has acquired jurisdiction, by appeal or otherwise, of a matter within the jurisdiction of the justice, then the county judge may issue the writ of injunction to enforce the jurisdiction of the county court; and it is only where the appellate jurisdiction has attached that the writ can be issued by the county judge. In this case, the judgment of the justice of the peace sought to be enjoined was under $20. The county court could not, by appeal or *certiorari,*or in any other mode, acquire jurisdiction of the matter. The effect of the injunction was not to enforce the jurisdiction of the county court, because it had no such jurisdiction, and could not acquire any. The injunction was issued without the authority of-law, and appellant’s motion to dissolve it should have been sustained.

June 15, 1881.

§ 1141. *Jurisdiction; improperly seehing to give.*It is a well settled rule in this state that if the plaintiff, in stating his demand, do so in such manner as that it appears that he improperly sought to give jurisdiction where it did not rightfully belong, that his case should he dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. [Bridge v. Ballew, 11 Tex. 269; Sherwood v. Douthit, 6 Tex. 224; Austin v. Clapp, 5 Tex. 130; Gouhenant v. Anderson, 20 Tex. 459.]

§ 1142. *Damages; exemplary, for wrongful seizure of property.*To entitle a party to recover exemplary damages for the wrongful seizure of his property by an officer, the burden is upon such party to establish that the seizure was prompted by ill feeling or improper motive. [Weaver v. Ashcroft, 50 Tex. 427.]

Beversed and remanded.
#### Daniel Sargent v. Ranger & Co.

(No. 46, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 68.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

February 5, 1877.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 617. *Letter of credit; how far maker of is liable for money advanced on faith of.*On the 31st of August, 1866, Eanger & Oo. delivered to W. H. Eussell the following: “The bearer, W. PI. Eussell, Esq., is authorized to draw on us for six hundred dollars, specie. Eanger & Oo.” On the 3d of September, 1866, Eussell drew the following draft: “Messrs. Eanger & Oo., please pay to W. D. Sargent, three hundred and fifty ($350) dollars, specie. W. H. Eussell.” Eanger & Oo. refused to accept and pay this draft, because Eussell had already drawn the amount of the letter of credit. Sargent sued Eanger & Oo. *Held,*that whilst Eanger & Oo. would unquestionably be liable for and compelled to honor the drafts of Eussell to the full amount they had authorized Eussell to draw on them for, they cannot be required to go any further; and one who has made advances upon the faith of the written authority, must inquire whether the authority given has not already been exhausted, and if he make such advances without making such inquiry, he does so at the peril of losing the whole amount so advanced, if it should subsequently turn out that the authority given had in fact, before the time of his advance, been exhausted. [Ranger v. Sargent, 36 Tex. 26; Roman v. Serna, 40 Tex. 312.]

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                         128,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,592,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    454,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,718,000
<PP&E>                                       6,465,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,972,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,423,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,393,000
<BONDS>                                      2,623,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          177,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,852,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,423,000
<SALES>                                     26,067,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,067,000
<CGS>                                       22,657,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,657,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
<FN>
The third quarter and nine month amounts were adversely impacted
by $300,000 of charges including $163,000 of deferred acquisition
costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### EXXON CORPORATION v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK AND SIDNEY GLASER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*329)
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 1, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: December 8, 2010 |   | /s/ Andrew F. Puzder         |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Andrew F. Puzder                                                |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                         |
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2007 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER 

4 BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT 

5 OF 2003. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HJ 44 RDS 

1 Congress approves the renewal of import restrictions 

2 contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and 

3 Democracy Act of 2003. 

4 SEC. 2. MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES. 

5 Section 13031(j)(3)(A) of the Consolidated Omnibus 

6 Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 

7 58c(j)(3)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘October 14, 2014’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘October 21, 2014’’. 

9 SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED 

10 TAXES. 

11 Subparagraph (B) of section 401(1) of the Tax In12 crease Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is 

13 amended by striking ‘‘114.50 percent’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘114.75 percent’’. 

15 SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

16 This joint resolution shall be deemed to be a ‘‘renewal 

17 resolution’’ for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese Free18 dom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

19 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 This joint resolution and the amendments made by 

21 this joint resolution shall take effect on the date of the 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

HJ 44 RDS 

1 enactment of this joint resolution or July 26, 2007, which2 ever occurs first. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By DEBORAH M. SPRIGGS, 

Deputy Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS