alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Larry K. Hinson, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company. 
 
 
 /s/
Larry K. Hinson __________________
 Larry K.
Hinson,
 Principal
Accounting Officer
 February
14, 2005
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by Rockport Healthcare
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### C. L. Collins v. Sarah W. Turner et al.

(No. 219, Op. Book No. 1, p. 302.)

Appeal from Smith County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 517. *Trespass upon property; possession of property is title sufficient to maintain action for; community property.*Appellant sued appellees for damages caused to land by ditches which they had dug in such manner as to overflow the land. He alleged the land injured to be the community property of himself and his deceased wife. The trial court charged the jury upon the subject of title *257to the land as follows: “In order to entitle the plaintiff to recover, you must be satisfied from the evidence before you that the land claimed to be the community property of the plaintiff and his deceased wife is the community property of the plaintiff and his deceased wife. A deed to property to the wife, purchased by the husband with community funds, raises the presumption that it was the intention that the property should become the' separate estate of the wife. But this presumption may be removed by evidence that it was not the intention of the parties at the time of the conveyance that it should become the separate property of the wife.” Held, this charge is the reverse of the law. Property conveyed to the wife during marriage is presumed to be community property, in the absence of evidence that it was paid for out of the separate estate of the wife. [Stanley v. Epperson, 45 Tex. 645; Cooke v. Bremond, 27 Tex. 457.] No doctrine is better settled than that property purchased during the marriage, whether the conveyance be in the name of the husband or wife, or in the joint name of both, is to he taken *prima facie*to belong to the community. [Higgins v. Johnson, 20 Tex. 389; Huston v. Curl, 6 Tex. 239; Mitchell v. Marr, 26 Tex. 331; Holloway v. Holloway, 30 Tex. 179.] The charge was also erroneous because it made plaintiff’s right to recover depend upon his title to the land. The title to the land was not a material issue in the case. Possession of the land by appellant was sufficient to entitle him to maintain the action. ' Actual possession is sufficient to ground an action against a wrongdoer; for he who commits a trespass upon the possession of another, being himself a wrongdoer, has no right to put the other party upon proof of title. [1 Blackf. 89, 90; 8 Blackf. 575; 4 Ind. 219; 21 Ind. 468; 1 Comst(N. T.) 223.]

November 7, 1877.

Be versed and remanded..
#### J. F. Ketcherside v. J. P. Cox et al.

(No. 1258, R. Book No. 4, p. 194.)

Appeal from Hill County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 228. *Jurisdiction of county court.*Suit was brought in justice’s court for $150 damages. Judgment rendered for defendants that they recover costs. On appeal to the county court a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction was sustained, on the ground that the amount of the judgment appealed from was less than $20. *Held,*error.

*91November 21, 1882.

*The amount in controversy*in the original suit, *and not the amount of the judgment*rendered, determines on appeal the jurisdiction of the appellate tribunal. [Rev. Stats, art. 1165; Jones v. Jones, Austin Term, *ante,*p. 19.]

Reversed and remanded.
#### GEORGE J. COBB v. JOHN A. WADDINGTON, DIRECTOR OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 154 *N. J. Super.*11)
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                              Exhibit 11

                     ENGINEERED SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC.
             STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                    Three Months Ended
                                                        January 31
                                               ----------------------------
                                                  1999              1998
                                               ----------        ----------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
NET INCOME                                     $1,388,403        $  919,161
                                               ==========        ==========

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Average basic shares outstanding              4,852,342         4,762,133
                                               ==========        ==========

                                                     $.29              $.19
                                               ==========        ==========

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Average basic shares outstanding              4,852,342         4,762,133

  Net effect of dilutive stock options<F1>        179,997           205,233
                                               ----------        ----------
                                                5,032,339         4,967,366
                                               ==========        ==========

                                                     $.28              $.19
                                               ==========        ==========

<FN>
<F1> Based on the treasury stock method.
</TABLE>

Note:  On June 26, 1998, the Company effected a 3-for-2 stock split in the form
of a 50% stock dividend.  All share and per share amounts included on this
schedule reflect this stock split.

                                  1
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF SEPTEMBER 23 , 2014

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD75728 Wilbe r Mate o vs. State of Missouri

WD77129 Jacqueline Easley vs. Division of Employment Security

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD76216 State of Missouri vs. Ramone D . Winters
[No. 24214-1-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### Raymond Yocum, *Respondent,*v. Fibre Federal Credit Union, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 97-2-00814-1, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered December 2, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Hunt, A.C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
News United States Air Force
 DOD, AF science and technology leaders testify before SenatePublished April 11, 2014
                        
                        
                        Air Force Public Affairs Agency Operating Location-P
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Kevin Gooder, the program integration division chief of the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee’s subcommittee on emerging threats and capabilities April 8.Gooder told senators that globalization and the proliferation of technology means the Air Force faces threats across a wide spectrum and competition across all domains.technology 



senate 



science
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4677]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     MORE ON THE REPUBLICAN BUDGET

  (Mr. EWING asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. EWING. Mr. Speaker, I think we should have shame on us for the 
campaign that is being waged against our efforts to balance the budget. 
All of us know that it is necessary, if we are going to save this 
country, to balance the budget. And yet we have a smear campaign of 
unusual proportions.
  My colleagues we hear about cuts in Medicare, except Medicare is 
going to go up. We hear about specific changes, but you cannot point 
out those specific changes. You just get up and spout off about them. 
We talk about tax cuts for the rich, but you miss the whole point, that 
there is tax relief for the families of America.
  We talk about letters from home. I will answer those letters 
honestly. I am going to save the Medicare Program. I am going to 
balance the budget.
  I believe the cruelest thing we can do is put fear in the hearts of 
senior citizens. The thinking Americans know that we are going to do 
it, and they support us.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force launches new program to capture innovative ideasPublished April 4, 2014
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials announced the creation of a new program April 4, designed to harness Airmen’s innovation.  
Airmen Powered by Innovation, or API, will replace three existing Air Force “good idea” programs – the Innovative Development through Employee Awareness, Productivity Enhancing Capital Investment, and Best Practices programs – and expand the role of Air Force Smart Operations for the 21st Century.
“API will consolidate the benefits of each program and simplify the process for submitting ideas, making it easier for our Airmen at the lowest levels to effect change across the entire Air Force,” said David Tillotson, the Air Force deputy chief management officer. 
Installations’ manpower offices will be responsible for assisting and supporting Airmen as they submit ideas. In addition to gaining efficiencies by consolidating existing programs, API will also offer Airmen increased access to assistance prior to submitting ideas and institute a top-down tracking requirement, which includes confirming and documenting savings realized from implementing Airmen’s ideas. 
“The requirement for us to track these ideas from the top down recognizes the importance we place in having an environment that fosters and rewards innovation at all levels,” said Gen. Larry Spencer, the Air Force vice chief of staff. “In this fiscally-constrained environment, we need every Airman engaged in finding smarter ways to do business.”
API will serve as a follow-on program to institutionalize the success of the 2013 Every Dollar Counts campaign. During the campaign, 302 ideas submitted by Airmen were implemented by the Air Force, generating savings of $71 million and 24,000 hours annually.
“Our Airmen are the finest in the world and care about making sure our Air Force remains the best in the world,” Spencer said. “I wasn’t at all surprised by how many good ideas they had, and as leaders, we owe it to them to make sure their ideas are heard. API will ensure their ideas can be implemented.”
Airmen who wish to submit ideas through API may do so by going online to https://ipds.afpc.randolph.af.milor by working with their local AFSO21 office.*(Courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)*manpower 



efficiency 



Airmen Powered by Innovation 



innovation 



ideas Related Links
        Airmen Powered by Innovation
            
            GENERAL LARRY O. SPENCER
                                Aug. 3, 2015
                                Gen. Larry O. Spencer is Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID MALDONADO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1200

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-14543CF10A.

David Maldonado, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SCWC

- 13

- 0002852

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

COLIN D. GARDNER, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 13

- 0002852; CASE NO. 2DTC

- 13

- 004202)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Poll ack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant Colin D. Gardner’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on September 29, 2015,

is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to

Rule 34(c) of the Hawai  i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for

retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, November 10 , 2015.

James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Artemio C. Baxa

for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0002852

10-NOV-2015

08:42 AM
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

KING, GASTON, and, COGLEY, 

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Michael S. LIBBY

Fire Controlman First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 201900270

Decided: 19 March 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge:

Michael J. Luken

Sentence adjudged 29 May 2019 by a general court-martial convened 

at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge 

sitting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction 

to E-3, confinement for 2 years, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Captain Brian L. Farrell, USMCR

For Appellee: 

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but 

may be cited as persuasive authority under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2.
United States v. Libby, No. 201900270

2

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 

U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 442 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 3, 2008 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to correct the 

enrollment of the bill S. 3001. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3001, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rections: 

5 (1) In section 201(1), strike 

6 ‘‘$11,045,052,000’’ and insert ‘‘$10,943,840,000’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

HCON 442 RDS 

1 (2) In section 202(a), strike ‘‘$11,799,660’’ 

2 and insert ‘‘$11,799,660,000’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 CSAF Leadership Library: Summer 2021Published July 26, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                **Airmen,*****“Data will talk if you are willing to listen” –Jim Bergeson***
Every day we make countless decisions in our daily lives. How do we use data to make decisions?
My summer additions to the Leadership Library, **Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men**, **The Social Dilemma**, and **The Third Revolution, Xi Jinping, and the New Chinese State** help answer that question. 
Data is central to helping us drive and make decisions. It enables us to analyze the operating environment to assess trends and patterns in complex systems. Data is critical to gaining an information advantage against potential adversaries and is a hallmark of Joint All Domain Operations (JADO). 
As you reflect on the ideas in **Invisible Women** and **The Social Dilemma**, consider how hidden data bias can unconsciously affect our decision-making, judgment, and reasoning and how robust data and analysis plays an important role in the design of our future Air Force through Action Order D. To transition from the Air Force we have to the Air Force We Need we must have data-backed analysis to support today’s hard resourcing choices to maintain our decisive advantage in the future.
Finally, as you read **The Third Revolution, Xi Jinping, and the New Chinese State**, think about “Big Data” within the context of competition with our potential adversaries. Understanding how competitors leverage information to promote their ambitions and conduct future warfare is a critical component of Action Order C.
You can find this media and more on my newly updated **CSAF Leadership Library website**. 
Sincerely,**CHARLES Q. BROWN, JR.
General, U.S. Air Force
Chief of Staff**

*Editor's note: The CSAF Leadership Library is a fluid set of media selected by Gen. Brown that evolves as novel ideas are published, recorded and debated. New entries will be added periodically throughout the year.*



****Recommendations:****



**Books**
   
   **Documentaries****The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State**
   Elizabeth C. Economy
   
   **The Social Dilemma**
   Netflix Original Series**Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men**
   Caroline Criado PerezCSAF 



reading list 



leadership 



library 



book 



podcasts 



Air Force 



innovation 



Growth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         140,735
<SECURITIES>                                   128,075
<RECEIVABLES>                                  415,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               749,886
<PP&E>                                         510,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,562,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          462,170
<BONDS>                                        160,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,146
<OTHER-SE>                                     894,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,562,527
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               869,727
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  760,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,778
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,794
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4437]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

PERMISSION TO FILE PRIVILEGED REPORT ON RULE FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 
                    655, HYDROGEN FUTURE ACT OF 1995

  Mr. SOLOMON. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Committee on Rules may have until midnight tonight to file a privileged 
report on a rule for the consideration of H.R. 655, the Hydrogen Future 
Act of 1995.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from New York?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```