alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |                       |        |                                    
|------------------------- | --------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------
|/s/ Philip K. Polkinghorn | /s/ Peter A. Hofmann 
|Name:                     | Philip K. Polkinghorn | Name:  | Peter A. Hofmann                   
|Title:                    | President             | Title: | Senior Executive Vice President and
|                          |                       |        | Chief Financial Officer            
|Date:                     | March 30, 2009        | Date:  | March 30, 2009                     



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PHL Variable Insurance Company and will be retained by PHL Variable Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# DOD facilities gear up to issue ID cards to same-sex couples

              - Published  Aug. 20, 2013
              -                             By Jim Garamone                                                         ** 
              - American Forces Press Service

**WASHINGTON (AFPS) --  **
DOD facilities are gearing up to issue identification cards to same-sex spouses beginning Sept. 3, Pentagon officials said today.

 

"All spousal and family benefits, including ID cards, will be made available no later than September 3, 2013," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen.

 

The Supreme Court decision to overturn portions of the Defense of Marriage Act made it possible for the department to recognize same-sex marriages.

 

"The department will make the same benefits available to all military spouses, regardless of sexual orientation, as long as service member-sponsors provide a valid marriage certificate from a jurisdiction -- including those overseas -- that recognizes same-sex marriage," Christensen said.

 

Entitlements such as basic allowance for housing and family separation allowance are retroactive to the date of the Supreme Court's decision -- June 26, 2013. For service members married after that date, the entitlements will be paid from the date of the marriage.

 

TRICARE -- the military health care program -- is tied to the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System. TRICARE will be available to same-sex spouses beginning Sept. 3, 2013.

 

There are 15 countries that recognize same-sex marriage. In the United States, 13 states and the District of Columbia recognize same-sex marriages.

 

Many U.S. service members live in jurisdictions that do not recognize same-sex marriages. As operational requirements permit, commanders may allow military personnel in same-sex relationships up to 10 days of non-chargeable leave for the purpose of travelling to a jurisdiction that allows same-sex couples to be married if they are stationed more than 100 miles from one of those areas.

 

"Personnel stationed within the continental United States may receive up to seven days non-chargeable leave and those stationed at overseas assignments may receive up to 10 days non-chargeable leave," Christensen said. 

ID cardsDefense of Marriage ActTRICAREsame sex couples
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6109
TOMICA LAVERNE WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANVILLE CITY JAIL, (Medical), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00662-jct) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tomica LaVerne White, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tomica LaVerne White appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White v. Danville City Jail , No. 7:06-cv00662-jct (W.D. Va. filed January 9, 2007; entered January 10, 2007). We also deny White’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
News United States Air Force
 Some AFSCs removed from eligibility for retention boardsPublished June 13, 2014
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Fewer Airmen than originally expected will meet involuntary retention boards this summer and fall, Air Force officials said June 13.
Air Force leaders eliminated approximately 4,000 Airmen from eligibility for the upcoming boards at Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James’s direction to bolster manning for nuclear-related air force specialty codes and to account for budgetary uncertainty regarding proposed force structure changes.
“Establishing full manning in our nuclear positions underscores the vital importance of this mission,” James said.  “It also offers these critical Airmen a more stable work schedule and improves their quality of life.  Budgetary uncertainty regarding proposed force structure actions is also driving us to retain more Airmen in some career fields.  Adjusting our force management programs reduces risk at this point.”
Commanders will be provided updated eligibility rosters for their units reflecting these changes; however, given the short timelines associated with these updates, Airmen should check their respective AFSC, grade or year group on the updated matrices posted on myPers today, to ensure they know their latest status. 
The enlisted retention boards and officer enhanced selective early retirement board for Airmen who are still eligible will occur in June with results released in late July or early August.
"Based on our discussions with Air Force senior leaders, the secretary and I decided to retain 4,000 Airmen who were previously eligible for the involuntary retention boards this summer," said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III.  "This adjustment is necessary because we're not sure whether we'll be allowed to execute the difficult decisions we made to divest force structure next year and because of our recent decision to increase manning in the nuclear mission.
“We don't want to cut a single Airman more than the number absolutely necessary to keep our force in balance.  This adjustment is another action that keeps us aligned with that principle.  Thanks again for who you are, what you do and what you stand for," Welsh said. 
Updates to information on force management and other personnel programs will continue to be available on myPers.  Airmen can also use the force management graphic on the Air Force Portal, which will take them to updated matrices and force management program details.*(Courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)*retention boards 



AFSC 



 



force management Related Links
        MyPers
            
            Air Force Portal
            
            Air Force Force Management News
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of ShopEye, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ending May 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ethelinda Corpuz, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge,:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Ethelinda Corpuz Ethelinda Corpuz Chief Executive Officer, principal financial and accounting officer July 19, 2013  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ShopEye, Inc., and will be retained by ShopEye, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: November 21, 2005

By:/s/
   --------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES−OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Christopher S. Bradshaw, as Principal Financial Officer of Era Group Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10−K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K, for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: April 26, 2013





/s/ CHRISTOPHER S. BRADSHAW


Christopher S. Bradshaw


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LARRY MARROW.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4597]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 WITHDRAWAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 87
  Mr. SALMON. Mr. Speaker, I request unanimous consent to withdraw my 
name as a cosponsor of House Joint Resolution 87.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arizona?
  There was no objection.
  

                          ____________________
```
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Tarpley, Appellant.

(Decided February 19, 1940.)

*Mr. John D. Ellis, Mr. Robert J. Paul*and *Mr. Charles B. Ginocchio,*for appellee.

*Mr. George Weller, Jr.,*for appellant.

Hamilton, P. J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the Municipal Court of Cincinnati,- Ohio.

Appellant was arrested on the charge of unlawfully and wilfully practicing barbering as a barber without a certificate of registration as a registered barber, contrary to and in violation of Section 1081-8, General Code.

*28His plea before the court on arraignment was “not guilty.” At the trial, counsel for the defense stated: “We have no defense,” and admitted that the defendant operated under suspension of his certificate of registration. ' The claim of the defense was that his certificate of registration was suspended for violation of paragraph 3 of Section 1081-17, General Code, which paragraph was unreasonable and, therefore, invaded his constitutional rights. The paragraph relates to the posting of prices. While we incline to agree with counsel for the defense that the requirement is unreasonable, that question cannot be raised here. It would be equivalent to converting this case into an action in mandamus to compel, the issuance of a certificate, or to lift the suspension.

Section 1081-8, General Code, provides for registration and makes it an offense to practice barbering without a certificate of registration. The constitutionality of that law is not attacked. When defendant admitted practicing barbering while under suspension, he admitted the offense as charged. If some of the requirements of the law prerequisite to the granting of a certificate by the state board are unreasonable, there are appropriate actions to correct and protect the applicant. But the simple question here concerns the admitted violation of a state law, the constitutionality of which is not questioned.

If the case were here in mandamus to compel the lifting of the suspension, we would have no difficulty in granting relief from paragraph 3 of Section 1081-17, General Code.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Matthews and Boss, JJ., concur. 1
#### MARION E. FOLEY v. AMBICAB, INC. AND NORTHBROOK EXCESS & SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY.

January 17, 1984.

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted and the order of the Superior Court, Law Division, denying the application of Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company to intervene in L-2636-81 is summarily reversed; and it is further

ORDERED that the trial in L-2636-81 is stayed pending disposition of the appeal in Foley v. Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (A-5482-82T3); and it is further

ORDERED that the Appellate Division is to accelerate consideration of the appeal in A-5482-82T3.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

J.N.J., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-2927

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 7, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Scott Brownell, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Megan Olson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Marathon shifts to virtual race due to COVID-19 precautionsPublished Aug. 20, 2021
                        
                        By Kimberly Gaither
                        
                        
                        88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                Marathon graphic

    











Due to increased **COVID-19** transmission both locally and statewide, the Air Force Marathon scheduled for Sept. 18 will transition from in-person participation to a virtual event.
The decision was made to protect the health and safety of more than 20,000 participants, volunteers and guests.
“We have watched, wrestled and worked continuously over the past few weeks to determine how to best execute the marathon this year,” said **Col. Patrick Miller**, **88th Air Base Wing** and installation commander. “To ensure the health and safety of all participants due to the continued high transmission rate of COVID-19 within our surrounding communities, we have decided to transition to a virtual event. Although this decision may be discouraging for some, it was made with the best intentions for all.”
With many options considered, marathon officials understand the disappointment of canceling the in-person race and the genuine experience of the marathon will not be realized at the same level participants have come to know and love.
“Our team feels the same disappointment everyone is feeling now,” said Brandon Hough, Air Force Marathon director. “There is a bigger picture here and that’s the safety of our participants, volunteers, and spectators and members of the Air Force.”
This year would have marked the 25th annual event with more than 11,000 runners from all 50 states and many countries participating.
“Similar to last year, we will have a virtual option and we’d love to have everyone participate,” he said. “For many of you, running with us virtually was just as powerful as this event is to celebrate the Air Force birthday and honor those who gave all in service to our country.”
For registrants, there will be a number of options available from running virtually, deferring or requesting a refund. Further details on this year’s virtual race will be forthcoming from the marathon team.
For more information, visit the Air Force Marathon **website** and follow the Air Force Marathon **Facebook page** for the latest updates.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Marathon 



COVID-19 



virtual 



Race 



safety 



Wright-Patterson AFB 



health 



One Air Force 



precaution 



readiness
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert C.
Brehm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                               /s/ Conrad Nagel
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   Conrad Nagel
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer

                                                 May 26, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50124 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TOMAS AGUILAR-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-543-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tomas AguilarGarcia concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Order entered June 2 4 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00780 - CV MICHAEL O. PICKENS, Appellant V. ELIZABETH CORDIA, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 01890 - F 

### O RDER This is an interlocutory accelerated appeal of an order denying, in part, and granting, in part, appellant’s motion to dismiss the legal action. See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 27.008 (West Supp. 2012). Bef ore the Court is appellant’s June 17, 2013 emergency motion for stay of discovery pending resolution of this appeal and appellees’ June 21, 2013 response to that motion. In their response, appellees informed the Court that appellant has counterclaims pend ing in the trial court that are not part of this appeal. Because counterclaims are presently pending in the trial court, w e DENY appellant’s motion

. /s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE