alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. F. Shaw v. W. A. Parvin.

(No. 2572, Op. Book No. 4.)

Error from Collin County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 365. *Contemporaneous instruments.*Two or more instruments, executed contemporaneously between the same parties, in reference to the same subject matter, are deemed one instrument and one contract. [Dunlap v. Wright, 11 Tex. 597; Howard v. Davis, 6 Tex. 174; Alexander v. Baylor, 20 Tex. 560.]

§ 366. *Parol evidence in connection with ivritien instruments.*In general, parol evidence is not admissible to vary a written contract [Dewees v. Lockhart, 1 Tex. 535; Franklin v. Mooney, 2 Tex. 452; Stamper v. Johnson, 3 Tex. 1; Self v. King, 28 Tex. 552]; but such evidence is admissible to explain an ambiguity [Franklin v. Mooney, 2 Tex. 452; Hamman v. Keigwin, 39 Tex. 34], or to explain a writing, when the explanation is necessary, and the evidence is consistent with the writing [Bender v. Pryor, 31 Tex. 341], and to ascertain the intention of the parties, when doubtful [Smith v. Doak, 3 Tex. 215], or to explain the language or terms used. [Roberts v. Short, 1 Tex. 373; Epperson v. Young, 8 Tex. 135.]

*155May 9, 1883.

§ 367. *Case tried by the judge without d jury.*Where a jury is waived and the case is tried by the court, and there is a conflict of evidence, the court below being in a better attitude to weigh, pass upon and determine the evidence than this court can possibly be, its judgment, based upon the evidence, will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.
#### George W. Carroll v. Wm. and Eliza Watson.

(No. 2812, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Milam County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 402. *Evidence in rebuttal; to what extent admissible in our practice.*Appellant having by his evidence established *aprima facie*right to recover against appellees for the cattle, closed his evidence. Appellees having fully rebutted the *prima facie*case made out by appellant, and by their evidence made good their defenses to the action here, closed their testimony. In rebuttal, appellant proposed to prove by several witnesses that appellees had not complied with the conditions named in the deed of conveyance of the cattle; that they had never had possession of the cattle until February, 1882, and up to that time had not claimed the cattle as their property, but had all the time prior to that date admitted that the cattle belonged to appellant’s wife, Mary Carroll. This evidence was objected to by appellees, and rejected by the court upon the ground that it was merely cumulative and was not in rebuttal of any new and independent evidence introduced by appellees, and that appellant could introduce in rebuttal only such evidence as would be in reply to new matter introduced by appellees about which appellant, in opening his case, had introduced no evidence. Held, *error.*At common law the rule adopted by the trial judge in rejecting this evidence would be sanctioned, but the common law rule upon this subject has not been followed in this state. In Markham v. Carothers, 47 Tex. 21, it is held that the usual and correct practice is that the party holding the affirmative of the issue is only required to make a *prima facie*case in the opening, and may reserve confirmatory proof in support of the very *175points made in the opening till he finds on what point his opening case is attacked, and then fortify it upon those points.

June 2, 1883.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THIS INFORMATION CONTAINS SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                         243,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,594,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                   475,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,600,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,564,182
<PP&E>                                      40,785,064
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,894,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,816,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,518,014
<BONDS>                                     14,535,823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,002,599
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,199,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,816,254
<SALES>                                     65,130,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,130,099
<CGS>                                       54,391,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,391,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               377,158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,527,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,001,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,918,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,083,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,083,881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 9 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States Postal Service 

should issue a commemorative postage stamp honoring former Representative Shirley Chisholm, and that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

should recommend to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be 

issued. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. THOMPSON of 

Mississippi, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, 

Ms. CARSON, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. 

ABERCROMBIE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. LINDA T. 

SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. WEINER, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. CASTOR, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, 

Ms. CLARKE, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. 

COOPER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States 

Postal Service should issue a commemorative postage 

stamp honoring former Representative Shirley Chisholm, 

and that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should 

recommend to the Postmaster General that such a stamp 

be issued. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 9 IH 

Whereas Shirley Anita St. Hill Chisholm was born on November 30, 1924, in Brooklyn, New York, to Charles and 

Ruby St. Hill; 

Whereas in 1968, Shirley Chisholm made history by becoming the first African American woman elected to the 

House of Representatives, representing the Twelfth Congressional District of New York until her retirement in 

1983; 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm was a founding member of the 

Congressional Black Caucus, a fierce advocate for women’s rights and democracy, and a staunch opponent of 

the Vietnam War; 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm was an outspoken advocate for 

equal rights, early childhood education, fair labor standards, and the Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday effort; 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm was a cofounder of the New York 

City Chapter of the National Organization for Women, 

the organization’s first chapter; and 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm further cemented her place in history when she became the first African American person 

to seek a major political party’s nomination for President 

in 1972: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

3 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

4 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be 

5 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring 

6 former Representative Shirley Chisholm; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 9 IH 

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

3 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Five ‘C's’ of Mission Command, Blended Wing Aircraft Prototype, $1.6 Billion for Dorms and CDC ImprovementsPublished Sept. 1, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, new doctrine is released on mission command, a blended wing aircraft is in development that could save money on fuel, and improvements are coming for dormitories and child development centers. (Hosted by****Senior Airman Saomy Sabournin) 

02:00
 **Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



mission command 



JetZero 



blended wing body 



CDC 



dorms 



Prototype 



doctrine 



Five Cs 



CSAF Related Links
        Air Force releases new memo, doctrine on mission command
            
            DAF selects JetZero to develop blended wing body aircraft prototype
            
            AFIMSC tackles dorm, child care center needs with $1.6 billion improvement plan
#### H. Munzerheimer & Co. v. E. R. Merrill.

(No. 1387, Op. Book No. 3, p. 416.)

Appeal from Gregg County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 578. *Appeal bond from justice’s court; signature of appellant; description of judgment.*This was an action of sequestration to recover a lot of lumber brought by appellee Merrill against appellant in the justice’s court in Gregg county. In the affidavit for writ of sequestration, and in the citation to defendant, it is stated that the firm of Munzerheimer & Co. was composed of H. *301Munzerheimer, and that if there was any other partner in the firm his name could not be ascertained by affiant. Judgment was rendered in justice’s court in favor of plaintiff Merrill, and Munzerheimer appealed to the county cpurt, signing the appeal bond simply ‘ ‘ H. Munzerheimer.” Motion was made to dismiss the appeal, and sustained by the court, because said bond was signed by “EL Munzerheimer” alone, when it should have been signed by “ IT. Munzerheimer *&*Co.” In this we are of the opinion that the court erred. The bond was sufficiently descriptive of the judgment rendered in the court below, and the signature of H. Munzerheimer was sufficient, he comprising the firm of H. Munzerheimer & Co., as shown by the pleading.

October 21, 1882.

Eeversed and remanded.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
 I, Wayne M. Fortun, Chief Executive Officer of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated, certify that:
     1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hutchinson TechnologyIncorporated;
     2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
     3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:
     a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     c)       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a)       all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 26, 2005              /s/ Wayne M. Fortun   Wayne M. Fortun  President and Chief Executive Officer
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Periodic Report of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ended October 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin DeFrank, President
and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Date:  August 14, 2003                          /S/ Geraldine Blecker
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: Geraldine Blecker
                                                Its:  Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 14, 2003                          /S/ H. Martin DeFrank
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: H. Martin DeFrank
                                                Its:  Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Annual African Air Chiefs Symposium beginsPublished Sept. 10, 2014
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt Patrick Mitchell
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa Public Affairs
                **DOUALA, Cameroon (AFNS) --**
                Military leaders of 17 African nations and the U.S. gathered for the fourth annual African Air Chiefs Symposium to discuss air force capabilities and important regional issues.Gen. Frank Gorenc, the U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa commander, attended symposium in 2013 and was on hand to deliver opening remarks to start the symposium."We are gathered in Cameroon to build on the accomplishments of previous meetings and focus on practical solutions to persistent problems," Gorenc said. "It is my goal that we will leave Cameroon with a clear sense of strategies and arrangement that will work best for Africa, concrete commitment of a network of African Air Chiefs, contacts for effective collaboration and fond memories of a hugely successful event."The current symposium marks the largest one to date, with a cross-section of invited countries spanning a wide area across the continent. Event discussions will incorporate multiple topics such as air security and surveillance, airpower contributions to counter violent extremist organizations, airfield security, and airlift support for peacekeeping operations."In this room, there is a community of Airmen with a tremendous amount of diverse experience in peacekeeping and counterterrorism,” Gorenc said. “We can leverage that experience, learn from one another and develop a way ahead that increases all of our security."The symposium will consist of six roundtable discussions facilitated by scholars from the Air Command and Staff College and the Africa Center for Strategic Studies. The air chiefs will also drive discussions based on their experiences and expertise."I challenge all of us to think outside the box, and to think regionally as we look to develop capabilities," Gorenc said.The U.S. Ambassador to Cameroon Michael Hoza, also attended the opening ceremony and delivered remarks."President Barack Obama invited your heads of state to Washington for an epic, changing summit meeting about the future of Africa," Hoza said. "This is Africa's decade."AFAFRICA 



symposium 



Africa 



cameroon 



Gorenc 



air chiefs 



USAFE Related Links
        FRANK GORENC
                                Sept. 30, 2005
                                Commander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe; Commander, U.S. Air Forces Africa, Commander, NATO Allied Air Command and Director, Joint Air Power Competence Centre
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1019 

To designate the United States customhouse building located at 31 Gonzalez 

Clemente Avenue in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez 

Nadal United States Customhouse Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. FORTUN ̃O introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States customhouse building located 

at 31 Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez Nadal United States Customhouse Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States customhouse building located at 

5 31 Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto Rico, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez 

7 Nadal United States Customhouse Building’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1019 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States customhouse building referred to in section 1 shall 

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez Nadal 

6 United States Customhouse Building’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1278

WILLIE A. KEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANSONBOROUGH HOUSE; DONNA COOK, Executive Director, individually and in her Official Capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv
- 00636

- DCN )

Submitted : July 16, 2018 Decided: July 26, 2018

Before KING , AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Willie A. Key , Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Fraysure Fulton , HALL BOOTH SMITH, PC , Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee s
.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this ci rcuit.2 PER CURIAM: Willie A. Key appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Ansonborough House and
Donna Cook . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accor dingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Key v. Ansonborough House , No.
2:17

- cv
- 00636

- DCN (D.S.C. filed Feb. 14, 2018 & entered Feb. 1 5 , 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately p resented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1090]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   CONGRATULATIONS TO FIRST OCCUPATIONAL CENTER OF NEW JERSEY AND ITS 
                                HONOREES

                                 ______

                        HON. WILLIAM J. MARTINI

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                          Monday, May 22, 1995
  Mr. MARTINI. Mr. Speaker, I would like to tell my colleagues about 
several very special individuals whose excellent work in the area of 
occupational and rehabilitational therapy for the aged, the disabled, 
and the disadvantaged has earned them high honors at the 41st 
anniversary celebration and annual awards presentation of the First 
Occupational Center of New Jersey on May 24, 1995.
  Peter Cocoziello, president of Consult Realty, Janet May, executive 
director of the West Essex Chamber of Commerce, John Smith, manager of 
public affairs at PSE&G, and Joan Verplanck, president of the New 
Jersey State Chamber of Commerce will all be the honorees on this 
memorable occasion. Their work with the center helps individuals and 
families challenged by both physical and economic disadvantages become 
contributing members of the community. With the support of individuals, 
private groups, and Government agencies, the center provides 
professional counseling and real work opportunities to those who truly 
need such services. For seniors over age 55, job readiness and 
placement services are available; for welfare recipients, remedial 
instruction and work experience are encouraged.
  The center, and the outstanding individuals that are being honored, 
strive to bring dignity and self-confidence to lives that may otherwise 
lose sight of these essential human traits. I congratulate these 
honorees: Mr. Cocoziello, Ms. May, Mr. Smith, and Ms. Verplanck for 
their contributions, and urge them to keep up their good work.

                          ____________________
```