alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
(equivalent of Chief Financial Officer), Treasurer and Secretary of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Date:  March 10, 2005                 /s/ Barbara J. Fournier
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Barbara J. Fournier
                                      Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
                                      (equivalent of Chief Financial Officer),
                                      Treasurer and Secretary
News United States Air Force
 SecAF visits 380th Air Expeditionary WingPublished March 22, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Michael Means
                        
                        
                        380th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James visited the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing here during her first overseas tour, March 19.
To learn more about the mission, role of the Airmen at the 380th AEW, James toured the flightline, had a walking tour of the base and held an Airmen's call.
"I've learned the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing is truly a hub for everything we are doing in this part of the world," James said. "This is a base that has it all. Whether we are talking about fighters, mobility, (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) or command and control, all of these missions are carried out here."
During the Airmen's call, James brought thanks from the leadership in Washington, D.C.
"I am glad to be here," she said. "I hear about what you all do and there is no substitute to coming here and walking the ground and seeing the mission that you work in and getting a sense of the rapid pace of life."
During the Airmen's call, James spoke about her career history and leadership experience, priorities, challenges the Air Force is facing, and core values.
"I am a new Airman, but I am not new to the area of defense," she said. "I've been in and around the world of defense for my entire adult life."
The first priority she discussed was taking care of people.
"My entire career I've focused on people issues," she said. "I think people are the linkage that brings everything together."
The second priority was balancing today's readiness with tomorrow's readiness.
"Balancing today's readiness with tomorrow's readiness is making sure that we have the modernized platforms," she said. "By doing so, we need the new planes, equipment and technologies to carry us forward into the future."
Her last priority was to make sure every dollar counts.
"We need to make sure that everything we do has value to the tax payer," James said. "Everyone has a role to play in making every dollar count. These priorities are going to permeate everything I'll be working on over the next several years."
The secretary also discussed the strategic environment and core values and took questions from Airmen.
"We need to remind ourselves continually about the importance of integrity, service and excellence," James said. "I am thoroughly impressed and glad to be out on the road seeing what our Airmen are doing in the field. You truly are the tip of the spear of our efforts in the theater."
The secretary wrapped up the Airmen's call by thanking Airmen for what they do.
"I want to thank you for the magnificent job you are doing," she said. "As I walk around and talk to Airmen and see how passionate, excited and committed they are to doing what they do, it makes me optimistic about being and remaining the best Air Force in the world."Deborah Lee James 



Senior Leaders 



380th AEW 



SecAF
EX-35.2
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

WF-RBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2011-C5


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

p1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145555

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145555

COA: 303275 

Jackson CC: 10-006279-FH 

FRANK RICHARD WULFF,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 28, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
23.1



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-180693) of our report dated March
30, 2016 with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements of Power REIT and Subsidiaries as of for the years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014.



We
also consent to the references to MaloneBailey, LLP under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.



|/s/
    MaloneBailey, LLP | 
|------------------------- | 
|Houston,
    Texas        | 
|                          | 
|March
    30, 2016        |
#### J. W. Howard v. Cicero Jenkins.

(No. 1211, Op. Book No. 3, p. 374.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

June 9, 1880.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 68. *Motion for new trial in justice’s court necessary to give jurisdiction on appeal.*Under the act of August 18, 1870 [General Laws 15th Leg. p. 172, sec. 3], a county court can only acquire jurisdiction of a case from justice’s court after a motion for new trial made and overruled and notice of appeal given in open court in the justice’s court.

Reversed and remanded.

Note. — The above is not now the law. See acts 18th Leg. p. 91.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2516-000]


Alta Wind V, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

September 10, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Alta Wind V, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 30, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98deddcadbd7f6f4f1f6fdcbede8e8f7eaecd8fefdeafbb6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3e5e6f1e0eccdcfcacdc6f0d6d3d3ccd1d7e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23220 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### John Hoerr & Bro. et al. v. A. H. Coffin.

(No. 1838, Op. Book No. 3, p. 746.)

Appeal from Grayson County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 185. *Surety; effect of agreement made by principal upon; liability of.*An agreement by the principal to pay usurious interest will not discharge the surety. [Payne v. Powell, 14 Tex. 600.] But it has been held *74that if the creditor, for a valuable consideration, agree with the principal debtor to extend the time of payment of the debt, or to delay its collection, the surety is thereby discharged from liability. [Pilgrim v. Dykes, 24 Tex. 383; Burk v. Cruger, 8 Tex. 66.]

§ 186. *Burden of proof.*It is an established general rule of evidence that the burden of proof lies on the party who wishes to support his case by a particular fact which lies more peculiarly within his knowledge, or of which he is supposed to be alone cognizant. This rule applies whether the fact be proved by affirmative or negative evidence. [1 Best on Ev. §§ 274-5.] Thus, in this case, the- suit was on a note against sureties, the principal being dead. Certain credits were indorsed upon the note, and it was shown that other sums than those indorsed had been paid by the principal maker of the note, during his life-time, to the plaintiff, but the amount of such payments was known only to the plaintiff. It was held that it devolved upon the plaintiff to prove the amount of such payments, and thereby show the exact amount still due, if anything, upon the note, and upon failure of plaintiff to make such proof he was not entitled to recover anything upon the note.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Kathryn E. Falberg, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public Limited Company (formerly known as Azur Pharma Public
Company Limited); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2012 |  | By: |  | /S/     KATHRYN E.
FALBERG                          
|                     |  |     |  | Kathryn E. Falberg                                  
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### John M. Holt et al. v. R. W. Riddle.

(No. 769, Op. Book No. 1, p. 516.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

May 1, 1878.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 340. *Appeal; when perfected.*Judgment was rendered at the September term (September 20th), 1877. Affidavit in lieu of an appeal bond was made by one of the appellants on the 20th of October, 1877, and appeal bond filed by the other on the 30th of October, 1877. *Held,*the appeal was not perfected in the time prescribed by laiv.

§ 341. *Without an appeal bond, or affidavit in lieu thereof, this court has no jurisdiction of the cause.*

Reversed and dismissed.
#### William Styles v. J. E. Rector.

(No. 871, Op. Book No. 2, p. 148.)

Appeal from Travis County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 957. *Statute of frauds; verbal lease of land; construction of statute.*Article 2464 of the Revised Statutes provides that no action shall be brought whereby to charge any person upon any contract for the sale of real estate, or the lease thereof for a longer term than one year; or upon any agreement which is not to be performed within the space of one year from the making thereof, unless such promise or agreement upon which the action is brought, or some memorandum thereof, shall be in wilting, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by some person by him thereunto lawfully authorized. The two clauses in the article above recited relate to distinct subjects and are independent of each other. The first clause was intended to affect all con*538tracts relating to lands, and would, of necessity, embrace leases for a term of a year, but for the special exception of them out of its operation. The second clause was intended to embrace other executory agreements or contracts, and upon these'the prohibition is imposed that they are to be performed within one year from the making thereof. Had it been the intention- of the legislature that the words, “from the making thereof,” should be applied also to leases for the term of one year, it is fair to presume that these words would have been added to that ■clause also. But that clause-speaks of the term only — the time during which the lease is to continue, and the lessee to possess the land. The time between the making of the lease and the commencement of it in. possession is no part of, the term. The English statute of frauds [29 Car. II, chap. 3, sec. 2] excepted from its operation leases for the term of three years, expressly defining the time when the term should begin. It says, “ all leases not exceeding the term of three years from the making thereof,” and under this statute it was held that a parol lease to commence *in futuro*could not be enforced. [1 "Wash. Real Prop. 531.] But in New York, Iowa, Indiana,. and other states where the language of their statute of frauds is substantially the same as ours, the contrary has been held. In Huffman v. Starks, 31 Ind. *475,*it was determined that when a parol lease of land for the term of one year, to commence thirty days after the making of the contract, was made, the lessee might maintain an action to recover possession according to the terms of the lease, or an action for such other remedy as would appertain to any valid contract. [See in support of this doctrine, Iowa Code, sec. 2410; Soby v. Brisbee, 20 Iowa, 105; N. Y. Rev. Stat. chap. 8, title 12, secs. 2-6; Young v. Dake, 1 Selden, 466; Taggard v. Roosevelt, 2 E. D. Smith, 100.] The statute throws-no .obstacle in the way of a parol lease for one year, to commence *in futuro;*and- there is nothing in the common law to prevent it; and in accordance with this view of the law, the parol *539lease in this case, which was for the term of one year, commencing *in futuro,*was held to be valid.

June 23, 1880.

Affirmed.
#### F. H. Bailey v. J. R. Hearne.

(No. 857, Op. Book No. 2, p. 163.)

Appeal from Robertson 'County.

June 23, 1880.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 969. *Infancy; decision of judge on facts; assignment of error.*Bailey sued Hearne upon a promissory note. The defense was that Hearne, at the time he executed the note, was a minor. To .this it was .replied .by the plaintiff that Hearne, after arriving at majority, had ratified the .note and promised to :pay It. A jury was-waived, and the judge -rendered .judgment -for Hearne upon his defense of infancy. The .evidence of -defendant’s infancy at the time he ■ executed the note -was .not controverted, but upon the-question of his ratification of the contract after majority, the-evidence was conflicting. The judgment of the county court for the defendant was affirmed, the court holding: 1. That the decision of the judge was entitled-to the same presumptions in its favor as the verdict of a .jury. [Gilliard v. Chessney, 13 Tex. 337.] As -to the disputed fact of the ratification after majority, it was the ¡province of .the court to weigh and judge of all the conflicting evidence which bore upon that issue, and there was sufficient evidence to support .the finding that defendant had not affirmed the contract after attaining his-majority. 2. Every presumption is to be indulged in favor of :the lower .court. .-It is incumbent on the party seeking to reverse á judgment to evince that it was.erroneous [Campbell v. Skidmore, 1 Tex. 475], and in assigning error die-should put his finger upon the very error. [Seawell v. Lowery, 16 Tex. 47.]

Affirmed.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.29    
    


CORGENTECH INC.  



	TO:	 	James Huang
	

FROM:	
 	

John P. McLaughlin

President and CEO
	

RE:	
 	

Bonus Plan
	

DATE:	
 	

October 11, 2002







        Set
forth below is your bonus plan from Corgentech Inc. (the "Company") for the first three (3) years of your employment with the Company (the "Bonus Plan"). 


1.     Annual Bonus:  


        Provided that you are employed on the dates specified herein, you will receive a guaranteed bonus each year for three (3) years (each, a "Bonus Payment")
as follows: 



	Bonus Payment Date
 
	 	Amount

	October 11, 2003	 	$	75,666.66
	October 11, 2004	 	$	72,666.67
	October 11, 2005	 	$	69,666.67






        In
addition to this guaranteed bonus, the Company, at its discretion, may provide you with additional bonus opportunities. Each Bonus Payment is subject to standard payroll deductions
and withholdings. You must be employed by the Company at the time a Bonus Payment is payable in order to earn and receive the annual Bonus Payment. In the event your employment with the Company
terminates, for any reason, prior to the time each annual Bonus Payment is payable, you will receive a pro rata bonus calculated by multiplying your annual Bonus Payment amount by a fraction, the
numerator of which shall be the number of days in the applicable year beginning with the first day of such year and ending with your date of termination, and the denominator of which shall be three
hundred sixty-five (365). 


2.     At-Will Employment:  


        You understand that this Bonus Plan does not constitute a guarantee of continued employment with the Company and that your employment relationship with the
Company is at-will. As such, either you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason, either with or without cause or advance notice. In addition, the
Company retains the right to modify your compensation and benefits, other than this Bonus Plan, within its sole discretion, upon notice to you. 


Agreed and Accepted:  



	/s/  JAMES HUANG      
 Print Name: James Huang	 	Date:	 	10/11/02












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.29
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Larry K. Hinson, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Larrry K. Hinson
-------------------------------------
Larry K. Hinson,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
November 11, 2004


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>