alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000773267
<NAME> INTERNATIONAL DESIGN GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                         674,223
<SECURITIES>                                   110,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,803,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (320,511)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,761,702
<PP&E>                                         151,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                (59,720)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,075,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,399,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          143,881
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,075,959
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,331,465
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,244,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               502,599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             399,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                185,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         REPORTS OF COMMITTEES ON PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as 
follows:

       Mr. GOSS: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 147. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (S. 4) to 
     grant the power to the President to reduce budget authority, 
     and for other purposes (Rept. 104-121). Referred to the House 
     Calendar.
       Mr. DREIER: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 148. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (S. 219) 
     to improve the economy and efficiency of Federal Government 
     operations by establishing a moratorium on regulatory 
     rulemaking actions, and for other purposes (Rept. 104-122). 
     Referred to the House Calendar.
       Mr. YOUNG of Alaska: Committee on Resources. H.R. 1175. A 
     bill to amend Public Law 89-454 to provide for the 
     reauthorization of appropriations; with an amendment (Rept. 
     104-123). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
     State of the Union.
       Mr. LIVINGSTON: Committee of conference. Conference report 
     on H.R. 1158. A bill making emergency supplemental 
     appropriations for additional disaster assistance and making 
     rescissions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, 
     and for other purposes (Rept. 104-124). Ordered to be 
     printed.
       Mr. SOLOMON: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 149. 
     Resolution providing for consideration of the concurrent 
     resolution (H. Con. Res. 67) setting forth the congressional 
     budget for the U.S. Government for the fiscal years 1996, 
     1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 (Rept. 104-125). 
     Referred to the House Calendar.
     

                          ____________________
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Bumgardner and Lemons 

ROBERT H. WOOD 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2037-98-3 PER CURIAM 

 FEBRUARY 2, 1999 

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND 

 ELECTRIC MUTUAL LIABILITY 

 INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Robert H. Wood, pro se). 

 No brief for appellees. 

 Robert H. Wood ("claimant") contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that Dr. 

Charles Ashworth was not his authorized treating physician, and, 

therefore, employer was not responsible for the cost of medical 

treatment rendered by Dr. Ashworth and by Dr. William E. Frank, 

upon referral from Dr. Ashworth. Upon reviewing the record and 

appellant's opening brief, we conclude that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's 

decision. See Rule 5A:27. 

 In denying claimant's request that employer be held 

responsible for the cost of medical treatment rendered to 

claimant by Drs. Ashworth and Frank, the commission found as 

follows: 

 Although he was treated several times by 

the employer's plant physician, Dr. Robert J. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, 

this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

Glenn, Mr. Wood notes that his employer did 

not give him a panel from which to choose an 

authorized physician. He reasons that 

because he was not given a panel he could 

choose Dr. Ahsworth [sic] to be his 

authorized physician. 

 The fact that Mr. Wood was not given a 

panel did not give him the right to choose 

Dr. Ashworth as his treating physician. In 

1987, the Commission held that Dr. Glenn 

became Mr. Wood's treating physician. 

Because of that opinion, Mr. Wood's treating 

physician was Dr. Glenn. Therefore, Dr. 

Ashworth's treatment and the referrals by him 

are not the employer's responsibility. 

 The commission's 1987 opinion held that Dr. Glenn was 

claimant's treating physician. That opinion was not appealed, 

and, therefore, became final. In general, absent a referral from 

Dr. Glenn, the authorized treating physician, claimant was not 

entitled to change treating physicians except by permission from 

the commission or the employer. See Shenandoah Prods., Inc. v. 

Whitlock, 15 Va. App. 207, 210, 421 S.E.2d 483, 485 (1992). No 

evidence showed that claimant sought permission from the 

commission or employer to seek medical treatment from Drs. 

Ashworth or Frank. Accordingly, because Dr. Ashworth was not an 

authorized treating physician, any referral of claimant by Dr. 

Ashworth to Dr. Frank would also have been unauthorized. Based 

upon this record, the commission did not err in refusing to hold 

employer responsible for the cost of medical treatment rendered 

to claimant by either Dr. Ashworth or Dr. Frank.1

 

 1We note, as did the commission, that the documents 

submitted by claimant after the commission's decision did not 

qualify as after-discovered evidence, and, therefore, we did not 

consider them on appeal. 
- 3 - 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 72 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 72

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 110-92 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and 
inserting ``December 31, 2007''.
    Sec. 2.  Public Law 110-92 is further amended by adding at the end 
the following new sections:
    ``Sec. 160.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this joint 
resolution, there is appropriated for payment to the heirs at law of 
Julia Carson, late a Representative from the State of Indiana, 
$165,200.
    ``Sec. 161.  Notwithstanding section 106, the authority to provide 
care and services under section 1710(e)(1)(E) of title 38, United 
States Code, shall continue in effect through September 30, 2008.
    ``Sec. 162.  Notwithstanding section 106, the authority provided by 
section 2306(d)(3) of title 38, United States Code, shall continue in 
effect through September 30, 2008.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEFANO MAZZOLA.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Shaw AFB firefighters awarded DOD level honorPublished June 24, 2014
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jonathan Bass
                        
                        
                        20th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. (AFNS) --**
                Two firefighters from the 20th Civil Engineer Squadron received a Defense Department level award for heroism based on their actions that took place, April 9, 2013.Tech. Sgt. Joseph Charleston, the 20th CES station captain, and Senior Airman Boyd Korb, a 20th CES firefighter, were directly responsible for the lifesaving rescue of a downed civilian firefighter in Sumter, S.C.The Airmen received awards at the Air Combat Command and Air Force levels before going up to the DOD level."We were tasked to perform ventilation inside the structure," Charleston said. "We went inside to check for fire extension and when we went to the second floor there was heavy smoke."Fire extension describes the spread of fire to other rooms through walls and other paths."Myself and Senior Airman Korb ran into some county firefighters who were in the building," Charleston said. "They asked us if we knew where one of their men was at, and we didn't hear anything, I told everybody to be quiet and we heard the (missing) firefighter's PASS (personal alert safety system) device going off."A PASS device is worn by firefighters and emits a loud, audible noise if the firefighter is in distress.After hearing the missing firefighter's PASS alert, Charleston and Korb traced the sound to an elevator shaft, he said.At the bottom of this shaft was the downed firefighter, alive and conscious, but unable to move.Charleston and Korb received permission to assist and rescued the firefighter by accessing the shaft from the first floor."Our firefighters spend a lot of time training, but training only goes so far," said Lt. Col. Terry Walter, the 20th CES commander.Training for worst-case scenarios can be the best tool to prepare young Airmen for the challenges of being a firefighter here, Walter said."We're proud to be one of the best fire departments in the DOD," Charleston said. "We show it day in and day out."firefighter 



Shaw AFB
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4677]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           THE PHELPS SCHOOL

  (Mr. STEARNS asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. STEARNS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and congratulate 
the Phelps School from Malvern, PA. The students at that school, the 
senior class is here today, and I want to recognize them.
  The Phelps School whose motto is ``dedication to the individual 
boy,'' strives to meet the needs and develop the strengths of each of 
its students.
  The teachers and faculty take great pride in empowering young men to 
improve themselves. The school fosters the growth of each student, 
academically, socially, and personally. In other words, Mr. Speaker, it 
builds character, something sorely needed in America today.
  The Phelps School is a small institution where every young man feels 
special, like a member of a family. The Phelps School exemplifies a 
good education today in America. Students come to the school as boys 
and leave as young men, ready to further their education.
  I take great pride today in welcoming the Phelps School and the 
senior class. I wish them all the best as they begin their journey 
towards the rest of their lives. I know they are well prepared and 
ready for the world, as all the school's graduates have been for almost 
50 years. My hat is off to the director, Mr. Phelps, and all the 
seniors.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, the Chief Financial Officer of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the registrant), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:April 2, 2007
/s/
Michael E. HaylonName:Michael E. HaylonTitle:Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Luke AFB advances training during Exercise Desert Hammer

              - Published  Nov. 12, 2023
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Mason Hargrove                                                    
              - 56th Fighter Wing

**LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --  **
The 56th Fighter Wing conducted Instructor Pilot War Day in conjunction with a larger joint-force exercise hosted by the **944th Fighter Wing**, Exercise Desert Hammer, Nov. 3-4, over the Barry M. Goldwater Range, Arizona.

Exercise Desert Hammer combined with IP War Day, involved more than 300 combat support Airmen and 96 aircraft, this joint-force exercise is a routine event with U.S. **Air Force Reserve**, **Air National Guard**, **U.S. Marine Corps**, and **U.S. Navy**. 

SH-60 Sea Hawk aircraft assigned to Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 6 conduct landing and refueling operations, Nov. 3, 2023, at Gila Bend Auxiliary Airfield, Arizona. The SH-60’s participated in a total force effort where the 56th Fighter Wing conducted Instructor Pilot War Day in conjunction with a larger joint-force exercise hosted by the 944th Fighter Wing, Exercise Desert Hammer. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Jakob Hambright)
Photo Details /                Download Hi-Res“The purpose of IP War Day is to guarantee that our operators preserve an elite standard of tactical skill and that our instructor pilots can translate insights from the large-scale exercise into regular training for their students,” said U.S Air Force Col. Matthew Johnston, **56th Operations Group** commander. “This exercise solidifies the tactical readiness of our Airmen and affirms their expertise, reinforcing our commitment to training the world’s greatest fighter pilots and combat-ready Airmen.” 

The exercises aimed to replicate intense aerial combat scenarios, featuring an array of aircraft including **F-35A Lightning II**’s from the 61st Fighter Squadron, **F-16 Fighting Falcons** from 309th Fighter Squadron, F-35B Lightning II’s from **USMC Air Station Miramar**, and a **KC-46 Pegasus** and **F-15 Eagles** from **Seymour Johnson Air Force Base**. 

“IP War Day is a testament to our commitment of advancing training and readiness,” said U.S. Air Force Reserve Lt. Col. William Wisehart, 944th Operations Group deputy commander. “This exercise not only reinforces our operational capabilities but also strengthens our community ties, aligning with our mission to train combat ready Airmen and foster enduring partnerships.” 

The exercise’s primary intent was to maintain and enhance tactical proficiency, particularly focusing on air-to-air defensive maneuvers in a variety of combat scenarios and contested areas. It aimed to bolster coordination and readiness among the various units, ensuring that aircrews are adept and prepared for the agile deployment of airpower in future operations. U.S. Air Force Logo

LRUSAFAFAir ForceExercise Desert HammerInstructor Pilot War DayLuke AFB944th FWAFRANGMarine CorpsNavyF-15f-16F-35KC-46Seymour Johnson AFB56th OG944th OG56th FWSH-60
#### J. A. Goldman & D. H. Moseley v. Langford & Hart.

(No. —, Op. Book No. 2, p. 29.)

Appeal from — County.

December 18, 1878.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 538. *Amendment of petition during trial, and indorsement of a note during trial to obviate objections to it.*Suit was instituted by appellees on two notes, payable to the order of Langford & Patton. On the trial, after a jury had been impaneled and the pleadings read, plaintiffs offered to read the notes in evidence, to which defendants excepted: 1. Because the petition alleges that the notes were indorsed by Langford & Patton to plaintiffs, when no such indorsement appears on the notes. 2. That the notes are made payable to Langford & Patton, or order, and not to plaintiffs, and therefore were not negotiable, and were not the notes described in plaintiffs’ petition, and plaintiffs could not sue upon them in their own names and introduce them in evidence without a written indorsement; which objections were sustained. Plaintiffs then asked leave, and were permitted, to file an amended petition, and got Langford, one of the plaintiffs, and a former partner of the firm of Langford & Patton, to write the assignment on the back of the note. To all of which defendants objected. Plaintiffs then read the amended petition, and also introduced the notes, as indorsed, in evidence. *Held,*error.

Reversed and remanded.
EX-35.3
(logo) TORCHLIGHT
INVESTORS
TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES


ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CERTIFICATION

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2011-C5
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 20ll-C5 (the "Trust")

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer
(the "Certifying Servicer"), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the
knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

1. I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying
   Servicer's activities during the year ended December 31, 2013 (the
   "Reporting Period") and the Certifying Servicer's performance under the
   Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer
   has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing
   Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


Date: March 13, 2014


TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

By: /s/ Jacob Baron
    Name: Jacob Baron
    Title: Authorized Signatory

230 Park Avenue New York, New York 10169
T 212.488.3653  F 646.253.9753
E jbaron@torchlightinvestors.com
  www.torchlightinvestors.com
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE

MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

J.A., MOTHER OF L.A., A CHILD

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1 347

LT Case No. 2017

- DP

- 117

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed October 1 3 , 2022

Appeal from the Ci rcuit Court

for Osceola County

, Laura Shaffer , Judge.

Thomas Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami

Beach, for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, Children’s

Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb

, Statewide Director of

Appeals and Desiree Erin Fernandez, of Statewide

Guardian Ad Litem Office, T allahassee

, and Albert

Evan Dix, of Hill Ward Henderson, P.A., Tampa, for

Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN

, WOZNIAK and SASSO , JJ., concur.