alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56118-56119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: October 21-22, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Ste. 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-5966,  <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cebf0f5dcf1fdf5f0b2f2f5f4b2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bacdd6d3fad7dbd3d694d4d3d294ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 56119]]


    Dated: September 9, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-23072 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RECIPROCAL TRADE AGREEMENT CONTRACT

Division                    Date Prepared 5/10/02         Approved ___________

1.     This Agreement is Between:

Station:  WIDU/WFMO/WAGR./WEWO
          PO BOX 2247
          Fayetteville, NC 28302

AND

Company:  New Dynamic Media, Inc.
          4809 Northwest 19th Street
          Coconut Creek, FL  33063
Contact:  Garland E. Harris, President

2.     WIDU/WFMO/WAGR./WEWO Agrees To Furnish To New Dynamic Media, Inc.
$500,000(WIDU-$250,000; WFMO-$100,000; WEWO 75,000; WAGR-$75,000) In Broadcast
Time (Subject to Station Policy) To Be Entirely Run Between 5/10/02 and 5/9/06.
New Dynamic Media, Inc. Agrees to Furnish To WIDU/WFMO/WAGR./WEWO $500,000 In
Stock Shares As Shown Below:

     Note:  If sold out will be moved to next available day same day part unless
approved different time slot.  All advertising to be placed through Sam Floyd.
Must be advertising that has not been on station for one year.

3.     Minimum to be run each month     $
4.     Maximum to be run each month     $
5.     Broadcast time to be charged          $

-----------------------------------------------
Value Received In Materials or Services Will Be
              Determined By

___  Catalog               _X_ Invoice (Stock)

_X_ Rate Card              ___ Other _________
                                Specify
----------------------------------------------

6.     See Reverse Side for Terms and Conditions.

7.     Contacts For Broadcast Time

8.     ____________________________     __________________________________
      (Individual Represent Station)   (Individual Representing Advertiser)

9.     Contacts For Materials and Services.

10.    ____________________________     __________________________________
      (Individual Represent Station)   (Individual Representing Advertiser)

11.    Remarks: Insert Here The Names Of An Advisor That The Buyer Is
Representing As Agent, Who Have Made Prior Commitments To The Buyer For the Use
Of This Time.

WIDU-$50,000 Shares       WFMO-$20,000 Shares             WAGR-$15,000 Shares
WEWO-$15,000 Shares       WES COOKMAN-$200,000 Shares     GREG P. FLOYD
                                                          -150,000 Shares
SAMMY E. FLOYD, JR.       HELEN F. FLOYD-$25,000 Shares   SAM E.-$25,000Shares
FLOYD-$320,000 Shares
HELEN F. FLOYD            RAYMOND WINTER-$10,000 Shares   MICHELLE WINTER
-$10,000 Shares                                           -$10,000 Shares
KAREN WINTER              RAYMOND WINTER, JR-$10,000
-$10,000 Shares
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   TRIBUTE TO THE MEMBERS OF THE RETIRED AND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM

                                 ______

                          HON. DAVID E. BONIOR

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to the members 
of the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program [RSVP]. Tomorrow afternoon, 
Friday, May 19, 1995, the RSVP of Macomb County is saluting the many 
seniors who provide vital volunteer services at a luncheon in Clinton 
Township, MI.
  The Retired and Senior Volunteer Program is a nationally recognized 
program for persons over 55 who serve as volunteers in their 
communities. In the 10th Congressional District, Catholic Services of 
Macomb sponsors RSVP at the local level.
  By matching the talents, knowledge, and interest of volunteers with 
community needs, the RSVP maximizes its services provided to the needy 
and ill among us. RSVP volunteers serve in schools, hospitals, 
community centers and with numerous social, health, and welfare 
organizations. Last year, 433 registered volunteers performed over 
50,000 hours of service and assisted 55 nonprofit agencies. The 
devotion RSVP volunteers have displayed to their community is an 
inspiration. Their contributions are many and they deserve our 
gratitude for their compassion and work.
  Taking an active role in one's community is a responsibility we all 
share, but few fulfill. I applaud all of the RSVP members who rather 
than retire to the easy chair, continue to serve our communities.
  I commend the members of the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program for 
their efforts and encourage them to continue their good work. Please 
join me in saluting the RSVP of Macomb on the event of their volunteer 
recognition luncheon.

                          ____________________
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series 2011-C3

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 29, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2,      2009 (the “Quarterly Report”) complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or      780(d)); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        | CKE      RESTAURANTS, INC.         |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      December 8, 2009 |                               |   |
|                        | /s/      Andrew F. Puzder          |   |
|                        | Andrew      F. Puzder              |   |
|                        | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
|                        | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
#### R. A. & E. A. Grant v. William Quinsell.

(No. 548, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 570.)

Appeal from Harris County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 733. *Injunction; authority of county court to issue.*Suit was commenced by petition for injunction in the county court to restrain and enjoin appellants from interfering with the collection of one month’s rent due' from one Levy, which said rent amounted to the sum of $30. On final hearing, the court perpetuated the injunction and rendered judgment for costs in favor of appellee. The only question in the case is whether the county court had authority to issue the writ of injunction in an original proceeding to restrain the collection of a sum not coming within the jurisdiction of that court. In civil cases the original jurisdiction of the county court is confined to those cases “where the matter in controversy shall exceed in value $200, and not exceed $500, exclusive of interest.” [Const. a,rt. V, sec. 16; Acts 15-tb Leg. p. 19, sec. 3; Acts 15th Leg. p. 172, sec. 1.] It is further provided in the constitution that the county courts shall have appellate jurisdiction in cases originate ing in justices’ courts where the judgment appealed from shall exceed $20, exclusive of costs. [Const, art. Y, sec. 16.] In the same section it is further provided that the *402county courts or judges'thereof shall have power to issue writs of *mandamus,*injunction and all other writs necessary to the enforcement of the jurisdiction of said courts. [Art. V, sec. 16; Acts 15th Leg. p. 19, sec. 5.] It appears, then, that county courts can only issue the writ of injunction in cases necessary to the enforcement of the jurisdiction of said courts. The greatest extent to which the courts have gone in sustaining the jurisdiction of county courts in issuing the writ of injunction, where the amount in controversy was below the jurisdiction of said courts, was in those cases where proceedings had primarily been commenced in justices’ courts, and the injunction was sought as an auxiliary or ancillary process. In such cases, by virtue of the fact that appellate jurisdiction was vested in the county court, the right to issue the injunction was held to be within, and could be used when necessary to the enforcement of its jurisdiction, and in the case at bar, had the suit been brought in the justice’s court in the first instance, doubtless the county court might have been applied to and could have issued the injunction as an auxiliary proceeding to restrain the collection of the $30. But as a primary original proceeding, we do not believe that the county court can issue an injunction, and in that way acquire jurisdiction of a case not within either its original or appellate jurisdiction.

March 5, 1879.

Reversed and dismissed.
#### CARLTON HOUSE v. RENT LEVELLING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.4_Vaczy






Exhibit 10.4




October 27, 2014


Catherine M. Vaczy, Esq.
140 East 28th Street
#11C
New York, NY  10106
Dear Catherine:
We are pleased to enter into this extension (the “Extension”) of your employment agreement dated as of January 26, 2007 (the “2007 Agreement”), as thereafter amended by amendments on January 9, 2008, August 29, 2008,  reinstated and extended on July 8, 2009, extended on July 7, 2010, extended on January 6, 2012, extended on  November 12, 2012, extended on July 12, 2013, amended on March 11, 2014 and amended on August 4, 2014 (the 2007 Agreement as so amended and extended, the “Original Agreement”) with respect to your service to the Company as its General Counsel.  This Extension shall become effective (the “Effective Date”) as of January 1, 2015 and shall modify the Original Agreement with respect to those different and additional terms as set forth below.  
		
	1.
	Your Base Salary shall be a minimum of $296,000, reviewed annually.




		
	2.
	The “Term” as extended shall begin as of the Effective Date and continue through December 31, 2015. 




		
	3.
	You shall be granted on the date of this amendment an option (the “Option”) under the 2009 Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) to purchase 40,000 shares (the “Shares”) of common stock, $.001 par value (the “Common Stock”) which shall vest and become exercisable as to (i) 20,000 Shares on the date hereof; and (ii) 20,000 Shares on December 31, 2015.  The per share exercise price of the Option shall equal the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of grant and the Option shall be subject in all respects to all the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Original Agreement.  


Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.  Except as set forth herein the terms of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.      
NeoStem, Inc.
By:/s/ Robin Smith
Name:Robin Smith
Title:CEO
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
/s/ Catherine M. Vaczy
Catherine M. Vaczy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from RCPI Trust's
Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and RCPI Trust's Statement of Operations for
the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         19,684        
<SECURITIES>                                        0        
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,996        
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0        
<INVENTORY>                                         0        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0        
<PP&E>                                        785,782        
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,272        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                858,625        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,207        
<BONDS>                                       540,080        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0        
<PREFERRED>                                         0        
<COMMON>                                            0        
<OTHER-SE>                                    290,062        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  858,625        
<SALES>                                             0        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               92,055        
<CGS>                                               0        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               62,258        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28,084        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,666        
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,713        
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0        
<CHANGES>                                           0        
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,713        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         305,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,298,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                   675,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,346,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,909,150
<PP&E>                                      44,345,919
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,684,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,971,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,143,157
<BONDS>                                     13,693,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,971,974
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,489,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,971,034
<SALES>                                     49,359,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,359,056
<CGS>                                       42,500,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,500,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,165,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,092,472
<INCOME-TAX>                                   803,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,289,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,289,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-20822 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. SUNDAY OKECHUKWU OGBONU, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-541-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Sunday Okechukwu Ogbonu raises an argument that h e c oncedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 3 08-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Knowledge of drug type and q uantit y a lso i s not an element of the offense under the related statutes of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and § 960. U n ited States v. R e s trepo-Granda , 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Valencia-Gonzales , 172 F.3d U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Aug ust 20, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-20822 Document: 00512346706 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013

### No. 12-20822

344, 345-46 (5th Cir. 1999). T he appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-20822 Document: 00512346706 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2914 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2914

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as the ``London Fallen Veterans 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 12, 2014

Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as the ``London Fallen Veterans 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LONDON FALLEN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``London 
Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```