alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 2072

_____________________________
R USSELL N AKIA M ASON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

. January 3, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , C.J.
, and B.L. T HOMAS and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Russell Nakia Mason, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0496 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. JONATHAN WILLIAM PRESLEY,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# :LED JUN 2 12022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf Montana ORDER

Appellant Jonathan William Presley appeals from the Judgment and Commitment ofthe First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, in its Case No. BDC 2019- 388. Presley argues the District Court erred by failing to give him credit for 372 days served. The State has filed a Notice ofConcession that this matter should be remanded to theDistrict Court forthepurpose ofenteringan amended sentence andjudgment. Without agreeingwith all ofthe arguments Presley has raised, the State agrees that in this case the District Court erred in failingto give Presley credit for 372 days served. Based on Presley's opening brief and the State's concession, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, with instructions for the District Court to amend its Judgment and Commitment and replace the sentence reduction for time served of31 dayswith 372 days. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to presidingjudge Honorable Mike McMahon. Dated this ZI day ofJune, 2022. 

# /er 06/21/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0496L lrl

- Justices
News United States Air Force
 Acting SecAF ‘gives thanks’ to Airmen in Osan, KunsanPublished Nov. 27, 2013
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Ashley J. Thum
                        
                        
                        8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **OSAN AIR BASE, South Korea (AFNS) --**
                Acting Secretary of the Air Force Eric K. Fanning visited Airmen in South Korea here, Nov. 25-26.
At Osan Air Base, in addition to making stops at the 607th Air and Space Operations Center and the 694th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Group, Fanning also held an all call to educate Airmen about the current climate of the Air Force.
Fanning discussed force structure, noting that promotions should not be affected because the branch still needs a healthy balance of all ranks, even after re-shaping.
"We need to invest in the new Air Force, invest in the future, and enhance our readiness," Fanning said.
Sexual assault prevention continues to be on the forefront of current policy, and Fanning emphasized the responsibility of every Airman to be a part of the solution.
"There are too many Airmen having things happen to them that should never happen," the secretary said. "We need to be open-minded and keep at this."
Fanning answered several questions about education benefits, upcoming Air Force initiatives and other topics related to maintaining combat readiness in a time of relative uncertainty.
As fiscal 2014 kicks into gear, Fanning encouraged Airmen to continue to keep a positive attitude.
"Thank you for persevering through all of this," Fanning said. "Seeing people stay focused and still able to accomplish their mission is great."
While visiting Kunsan Air Base, Fanning said he enjoyed getting to know more about the Air Force and its Airmen.
"Seven months into this job and I am amazed by how much I am still learning about the Air Force," he said. "The Air Force is everywhere; a lot of places that can't be seen -- and that's a big part of our job. It's our job to explain what exactly air power is (to the public)."
The secretary went on to thank the Airmen for their service, especially for at Kunsan AB, without their families during the holidays.
"I know all of you are deployed here without your families, and so I wanted to come to this base specifically to thank you and say ‘Happy Thanksgiving’ in person," Fanning said.*(Staff Sgt. Jessica Haas, 8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs, contributed to this story)*Wolf Pack 



Acting SecAF 



Eric K. Fanning 



South Korea
Exhibit 13.1**Certifications of the CEO and CFO****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Envoy Communications Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form20-F for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), Geoffrey B. Genovese as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andLinda Gilbert as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best ofhis or her knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.Date:December          , 2005     By: /s/  Geoffrey B. Genovese   Geoffrey B. Genovese  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   By: /s/ Linda Gilbert   Linda Gilbert  Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of ss. 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Hassler & Kinkler v. F. Kay.

(No. 143, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 183.)

Appeal from Austin County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 665. *Mutual accounts other than betiveen merchant and merchant; statute of limitation.*The cases of Pridgen v. McLean, 12 Tex. 420, and Pridgen v. Hill, 12 Tex. 374, cited by counsel for appellants as establishing the rule that mutual accounts, other than those between merchant and merchant, will not be barred by limitation if the last item on either side be within two years, have been overruled by the supreme court in Lowe v. Dowbarn, 26 Tex. 507, and the rule therein stated is that “by no legitimate construction of our statute of limitations [Pas. Dig. arts. 4604, 4605] can a suit on a mutual account, a part of which has been due for more than two years before'its commencement, be maintained to recover such part of the account.”

§ 666. *Statute of limitations not applicable to payments.*It seems that the statute of limitations has no application to payments [Beardsley v. Hall, 9 Tex. 119; Williams v. Bradbury, 9 Tex. 487; Ware v. Bennett, *36418 Tex. 794], and lias reference only to such items of charges in accounts as do not include what might legitimately be considered as payments.

January 19, 1878.

§ 667. *Practice where judgment is*correct, *though there may have been erroneous rulings.*From a careful inspection of the record it clearly appears from the evidence that appellants wore not entitled to recover a judgment, and, therefore, this court will not revise any erroneous rulings which may have been made. [Robinson v. Crump, 35 Tex. 426; Albright v. Corley, 40 Tex. 105; Carter v. Eams, 44 Tex. 544.]

Affirmed.
#### C. B. Burnham et al. v. J. O. Walker et al.

(No. 762, Op. Book No. 2, p. 55.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 899. *Demurrer; effect of.*A general demurrer goes back to the first error in matter of substance, that would not be cured by verdict, committed by either party. [State v. Williams, 8 Tex. 256.]

§ 900. *Composition with creditors; consideration.*A compromise settlement with creditors, for amounts less than those due by the debtor to them, is upon sufficient consideration. [2 Par. on Con. 618, and note X; 1 Rawle, 391.]

§ 901. *Composition with creditors.*When an agreement to accept in discharge of a liquidated debt a sum less than the full amount due forms a part of a composition in which several creditors join, mutually stipulating to withdraw or withhold suits, and that they will release to their common debtor a part of their claims upon payment of a certain other part, the agreement becomes binding between each creditor and the debtor, and it is not necessary to uphold such an agreement that all .the creditors should enter into it. [Lanes v. Squyres, 45 Tex. *512382; Perkins v. Lockwood, 100 Mass. 249; Eaton v. Lincoln, 13 Mass. 424; Stemman v. Magnus, 11 East, 390; Good v. Cheesman, 2 B. & Ad. 328; Boyd v. Hind, 1 H. & N. 938; Reay v. White, 3 Tyr. 597; 1 C. & M. 748; S. C. Daniels v. Hatch, 21 N. J. L. 391-394; Aiken v. Price, 1 Dudley, 50; 4 Exchequer, 755; 1 Strange, 426; 1 Smith’s Lead. Cas. 443.]

May 15, 1880.

§ 902. *Evidence; opinion or belief of witness.*It is error to allow a witness, over objections, to state his opinion or belief as to whether or not there was fraud in the transaction which is being investigated. [Purnell v. Gandy, 46 Tex. 190.]

§ 903. *New trial on the ground of admission of incompetent testimony.*To warrant the granting of a new tidal for the admission of illegal testimony, it must appear that the evidence is clearly inadmissible and goes to the merits, and is not supplied by legal testimony. If the evidence is upon an immaterial point, and could not have misled the jury, or if it is merely cumulative, and there is sufficient evidence without it to support the verdict of the jury, a new trial will not be granted. [Patton v. Gregory, 21 Tex. 513; Smith v. Hughes, 23 Tex. 249; Dignowitty v. Alexander, 25 Tex. Sup. 162; Hunter v. Hubbard, 26 Tex. 537; Dailey v. Starr, 26 Tex. 562; Cooper v. State, 23 Tex. 331; Sacra v. Stewart, 32 Tex. 185.]

Affirmed.
Exhibit 21.1





World Wireless
Communications, Inc. Subsidiaries and Affiliated Companys





Domestic Subsidiaries:





X-traWeb, Inc.


5670 Greenwood Plaza Blvd, Penthouse


Greenwood Village, CO 80111





X-traWeb Services Corporation


5670 Greenwood Plaza Blvd, Penthouse


Greenwood Village, CO 80111





X-traWeb Financial Corporation


5670 Greenwood Plaza Blvd, Penthouse


Greenwood Village, CO
80111





X-traWeb U.S.A., Inc.


5670 Greenwood Plaza Blvd, Penthouse


Greenwood Village, CO 80111





TWC Ltd.


10 Main Street


Gonic, NH 03839





International Subsidiaries:





X-traWeb Europe S.p.A. (In liquidation)


c/o Liquidatore Giudiziale Dott. Vitaliano Donato


Via Laura Cereto
17


25121 Brescia, Italy
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5485]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER RELATIVE TO FLOOR PRIVILEGES OF FORMER 
                                MEMBERS

  The SPEAKER. On June 9, 1994, Speaker Foley reminded former Members 
of the prohibition of clause 3 of rule XXXII against former Members 
obtaining floor privileges during the pendency of a matter in which 
they have a personal or pecuniary interest, emphasizing that the test 
for whether the rule is being violated is the former Member's status as 
one with a personal or pecuniary interest rather than their intent to 
lobby. On that occasion Speaker Foley also admonished former Members 
from importuning the doorkeepers to waive the restrictions of the rule, 
since the Chair may not even recognize a unanimous-consent request to 
do so.
  The Chair is taking this opportunity to reiterate the guidelines 
first announced by Speaker O'Neill under clause 3 of rule XXXII on 
January 6, 1977, and again on June 7, 1978, and by Speaker Foley last 
year in order to discourage former Members from attempting to exercise 
their limited floor privileges when they find themselves under this 
restriction and to remind former Members that the prohibition extends 
beyond the floor to rooms leading thereto, such as the Speaker's lobby 
and the respective Cloakrooms.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7230]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          IS CONGRESS IRRESPONSIBLE? THE VOTERS HAVE SAID YES

  Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, the impression simply will not go away: 
Today's $4.8 trillion Federal debt is a grotesque parallel to the 
energizer bunny we see, and see, and see on television. The Federal 
debt keeps going and going and going--up, of course--always to the 
added misery of the American taxpayers.
  So many politicians talk a good game--when, that is, they go home to 
talk--and ``talk'' is the operative word--about bringing Federal 
deficits and the Federal debt under control.
  But, sad to say, so many of these very same politicians have 
regularly voted for one bloated spending bill after another during the 
103d Congress and before. Come to think about it, this may have been a 
primary factor in the new configuration of U.S. Senators as a result of 
last November's elections.
  In any event, Mr. President, as of yesterday, Monday, May 22, at the 
close of business, the total Federal debt stood--down to the penny--at 
exactly $4,883,843,317,167.73 or $18,539.15 per man, woman, child on a 
per capita basis. Res ipsa loquitu.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 DAF senior leaders, spouses deliver their holiday messagePublished Dec. 22, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Department of the Air Force senior leaders, Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin, Gina Allvin, the CSAF's spouse, Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass, and Rahn Bass, the CMSAF's spouse, wish Airmen, Guardians and civilian teammates happy holidays.

02:24





01:14Happy Holidays 



CSAF 



CMSAF 



Gina Allvin 



Rahn Bass 



One Team One Fight
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50219 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ANGEL ARAUJO-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-97-CR-225-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Miguel Angel Araujo-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vasquez has responded with a brief in which he asserts that counsel misrepresented the sentence he would receive and was therefore ineffective. This contention is without merit. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); United States v. Gracia , 983 F.2d 625, 629 (5th Cir. 1993). Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave toNo. 98-50219 -2- withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00337

- CR

Talvin Djuan Garley v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court of Galveston County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18

- CR

- 0976

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considere d this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 30, 2022
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:  February
      23, 2009
            /s/ John G.
      Demeritt
              John
      G. Demeritt
              Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,017
<PP&E>                                          10,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,925
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,898)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,258
<SALES>                                          9,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,809
<CGS>                                            6,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 308
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (482)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,376)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (894)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 

Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. LANTOS (for himself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress approves the renewal of the import restric4 tions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom 

5 and Democracy Act of 2003. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

BEA Systems. Inc. Subsidiaries



|                                     |  |               
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|BEA CrossGain International          |  | Cayman Islands
|BEA CrossGain, Inc.                  |  | Delaware      
|BEA Government Systems, Inc.         |  | Delaware      
|BEA International                    |  | Cayman Islands
|BEA Systems (China) Co., Ltd.        |  | PRC           
|BEA Systems (FSC), Inc.              |  | Barbados      
|BEA Systems (Ireland) Limited        |  | Ireland       
|BEA Systems (Switzerland) Ltd.       |  | Switzerland   
|BEA Systems AB                       |  | Sweden        
|BEA Systems Distribution B.V.        |  | Netherlands   
|BEA Systems Europe Gmbh              |  | Germany       
|BEA Systems Europe Ltd.              |  | United Kingdom
|BEA Systems Europe N.V.              |  | Belgium       
|BEA Systems HK Ltd.                  |  | Hong Kong     
|BEA Systems Holding B, Inc.          |  | Delaware      
|BEA Systems India Private Limited    |  | India         
|BEA Systems Ireland Holding Limited  |  | Ireland       
|BEA Systems Italia S.P.A.            |  | Italy         
|BEA Systems Japan Ltd.               |  | Japan         
|BEA Systems Korea                    |  | Korea         
|BEA Systems Limitada                 |  | Brazil        
|BEA Systems Netherlands B.V.         |  | Netherlands   
|BEA Systems OY                       |  | Finland       
|BEA Systems Poland Spolka z.o.o.     |  | Poland        
|BEA Systems Pty Ltd.                 |  | Australia     
|BEA Systems S.A.S.                   |  | France        
|BEA Systems SA de CV                 |  | Mexico        
|BEA Systems Singapore Pte. Ltd.      |  | Singapore     
|BEA Systems Spain S.A.               |  | Spain         
|BEA Systems Stockholm Engineering AB |  | Sweden        
|BEA Systems, Ltd.                    |  | Canada        
|BEA Systems, Ltd.                    |  | United Kingdom
|BEA WebXpress, LLC                   |  | Delaware      
|Plumtree Software, Inc.              |  | Delaware
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 63 

Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 

2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat 

troops to Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2007 

Mr. SKELTON (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. JONES of North Carolina) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving of the decision of the President announced 

on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That— 

3 (1) Congress and the American people will con4 tinue to support and protect the members of the 

5 United States Armed Forces who are serving or who 

6 have served bravely and honorably in Iraq; and 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HCON 63 IH 

1 (2) Congress disapproves of the decision of 

2 President George W. Bush announced on January 

3 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional 

4 United States combat troops to Iraq. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS