alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California [Mr. Becerra] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. BECERRA addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,425
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,252)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Andersen AFB hosts ADA senior leader seminar 

              - Published  March 7, 2024
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Spencer Perkins                                                    
              - 36th Wing Public Affairs

**ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (AFNS) --  **
Members of the U.S. Air Force, Indonesian Air Force, Philippine Air Force, Royal Malaysian Air Force and Royal Australian Air Force came together to participate in the regional air domain awareness Senior Leader Seminar on **Andersen Air Force Base**, Guam, from Feb. 26 – Mar. 1.

Throughout the seminar, leaders discussed air domain strategies, policies, terminology and also developed a network of Allies and partners that have a shared understanding of **air domain awareness**.

“ADA is providing countries with knowledge of what is happening in their area so that they can ensure the sovereignty of their nation,” said Kevin Palko, Pacific Air Force ADA program manager. “While the course contains a lot of discussion on equipment and training, the core of it is with our Allies and partners’ trust and improving our relationships.”

Palko explained that Andersen AFB was an important place to host the ADA seminar due to its critical location in the Indo-Pacific and because it is home to the **36th Tactical Advisory Squadron**.

“The 36th TAS is comprised of highly skilled personnel providing expertise, training and mentorship to partner nations’ air forces,” said U.S. Air Force Master Sgt. Alan Alexander, 36th TAS current operations superintendent. “Our mission is to foster strategic partnerships, enhance regional security and deliver unparalleled expertise in airpower integration, ensuring a dynamic and collaborative force ready to meet pacing challenges.”The 36th TAS also works directly with our Allies and partners through 35 different programs that go beyond air domain awareness.

“We collaborate with a diverse range of countries across the Indo-Pacific region, including but not limited to: Japan, Australia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, India, Indonesia and the Freely Associated States,” Alexander said. “Our engagements span various areas such as training, exercises and capacity-building efforts to promote regional security and interoperability aligned with significant security cooperation initiatives.”

While the 36th TAS has been working with our Allies and partners, Palko was working to develop the ADA course for the past two years. He expressed his gratitude towards all the individuals that came together to make it possible and looks forward to seeing ADA grow within Indo-Pacific Region.

“This is just the beginning of a five-year plan for the ADA program and after the first day it was a great feeling to see the vision of the program become a reality,” Palko said.U.S. Air Force Logo

Andersen AFBair advisors36th TASLRUSAFAFAir ForcepartnershipsIndonesian Air ForcePhilippine Air ForceRoyal Malaysian air forceRoyal Australian air forceair domain awareness
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Alkame Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Eakle, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

 

1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

 

2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| Date: April 15, 2014

*/s/ Robert Eakle*

 

Robert Eakle

 

Principal Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

The foregoing certification accompanied the Annual Report on Form 10-K filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.  It is being reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 440 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                       October 2 (legislative day, September 17), 2008.
    Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. 
Con. Res. 440) entitled ``Concurrent resolution providing for a 
conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives and a 
conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.'', do pass with the 
following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 1, line 3, strike [from Monday, September 29, 2008, through 
Friday, October 3, 2008,]

(2)On page 2, line 2, strike [that] and all that follows through line 9 
and insert: the Senate may adjourn or recess at any time from Thursday, 
October 2, 2008, through January 3, 2009, on a motion offered pursuant 
to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee 
until such time as specified in that motion, but not beyond noon on 
January 3, 2009, and it may reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution.

(3)On page 2, line 15, strike ``time'' and insert: respective time

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 440

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
#### Taylor Hudson v. J. J. Long.

(No. 2821, Op. Book No. 4, p. —.)

Appeal from Bell County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 424. *Proceedings by distress; intervention; judgment by confession.*Hudson sued Long in justice’s court for rents of certain premises in the town of Belton. A distress warrant was properly issued and levied upon certain goods. Wilson filed affidavit and bond for the trial of the right of property to said goods, and they were delivered to him. The papers were returnable to, and properly returned to, the county court. Hudson filed his petition in that court, and excepted to the plea of intervention of Wilson. His exceptions were sustained, and Wilson went out of the case. Long confessed judgment in his answer, but the court, of its own motion, dismissed plaintiff’s suit. Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate being overruled, Wilson, as appears by the record, comes to the front and excepts to the ruling of the court in dismissing Hudson’s suit, and gives notice of appeal to this court. Hudson, upon learning of the condition of the record in regard to this matter, moved the court to correct the same, so as to show that he and not Wilson excepted and gave notice - of appeal. This motion was overruled, and Hudson excepted and gave notice of appeal, and at last the caséis properly before us at the instance of Hudson.

Did the court err in dismissing appellant’s suit on its own motion ? It appears from the record that the petition was not filed on or befare the appearance day of the term of the court to which said papers were returnable. Was this necessary to give the court jurisdiction of the cause ? We think not. Long, the defendant in the dis*188tress suit, upon this omission, could have complained, and at his instance the suit should have been dismissed. But he had answered said petition in confessing judgment upon all of the matters therein alleged. This being the case, the court should have rendered judgment for Hudson. Because the court erred in dismissing appellant’s suit, the judgment of dismissal is reversed, and judgment is here rendered in favor of Hudson against Long, as should have been rendered in the court below.

June 13, 1883.

Reversed and rendered.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the DBUBS 2011-LC3 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank of America, N.A., as
Primary Servicer, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc, as Servicing
Function Participant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as Pooled Special Servicer, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing
Function Participant, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Special
Servicer for the Providence Place Mall Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian.

    Dated:   January 24, 2014


    /s/ Helaine M. Kaplan
    Signature

    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### T. & P. R’y Co. v. H. R. Looby.

(No. 1382, Op. Book No. 3, p. 410.)

Appeal from Bowie County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 577. *Account; meaning*of,, *as used, in art. %366, Rev. Stats.; does not embrace a claim for unliquidated damages.*This was a suit originating in justice’s court, based upon a cause of action expressed as follows: “The Texas & Pacific Railway Company, Dr., to H. R. Looby. 1881. To four hundred and ninety-seven cross-ties, removed and appropriated to the use of said company and their employees, in said county, precinct No. 2, at thirty-five cents; amount due, $173.95.” This supposed account was sworn to by the plaintiff in the court below, Looby, in. accordance with article 2266 of the Revised Statutes. In the. justice’s court, judgment by default was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of the claim, and from this judgment the defendant appealed to the county court. In the county court, the defendant appeared and filed a sworn plea denying the justice of 'plaintiff’s cause of action. This plea was filed before the case was called for trial, but on the same day of the trial. The trial judge evidently considered the claim sued upon as an “account” within the meaning of article 2266, R. S., and that the defendant’s sworn answer thereto came" too late. Taking this view of the case, he disregarded the answer, and rendered judgment by *default*against the defendant, and awarded a writ of inquiry, which was *300thereafter executed, and a judgment final for the full amount of plaintiff’s claim was rendered against the defendant. The question presented is, does the claim sued upon come within the purview of article 2266? Is it an “account” within the meaning of that term, as used in the statute? The suit is for the value of property alleged to have been taken by and appropriated to the use of the defendant. It is the common law action of trover and conversion. The cause of action, as stated in the instrument sued upon, does not exist by virtue of any contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, and does not show a transaction between the parties, by which the defendant is *prima facie*bound for the payment of the amount claimed, or for goods sold and delivered, or other transaction legitimately forming the basis of an account proper. It is, on the contrary, as it shows upon its face, a claim for unliquidated damages, viz., the unascertained value of the cross-ties which had been taken by the defendant and converted to its own use. We are of the opinion that the plaintiff’s claim is not an “account,” within the meaning of the statute. [R. R. Co. v. Hayes & Co. *ante,*p. 416; R. R. Co. v. Morris, *ante,*p. 158.] The case should have been tried without reference to article 2266 of the Revised Statutes.

October 21, 1882.

Reversed and remanded.
In the Senate of the United States, 

October 2 (legislative day, September 17), 2008. 

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 440) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment of 

the Senate.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 1, line 3, strike øfrom Monday, September 

2 29, 2008, through Friday, October 3, 2008,¿ 

3 Ω2æOn page 2, line 2, strike øthat¿ and all that follows 

4 through line 9 and insert: the Senate may adjourn or recess 

5 at any time from Thursday, October 2, 2008, through Janu6 ary 3, 2009, on a motion offered pursuant to this concur7 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee until 

8 such time as specified in that motion, but not beyond noon 

9 on January 3, 2009, and it may reassemble pursuant to 

10 section 2 of this concurrent resolution. 
2 

•HCON 440 EAS 

1 Ω3æOn page 2, line 15, strike ‘‘time’’ and insert: respective 

2 time 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 440 

AMENDMENTS
News United States Air Force
 New "The Air Force Starts Here" podcast highlights upcoming AFCLC Language, Regional Expertise and Culture SymposiumPublished Sept. 27, 2020
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                A sneak peek into “Women, Peace and Security,” a scheduled presentation at **Air University**’s upcoming Language, Regional Expertise and Culture Symposium is highlighted on the **latest episode** of "The Air Force Starts Here," released Sept. 24.
On the podcast, Dan Hawkins from the **Air Education and Training Command** public affairs team sits down with **Dr. Kristin Hissong**, an assistant professor of regional and cultural studies at AU’s **Air Force Culture and Language Center**, to discuss the impact women have had on the changing nature of warfare and the importance of women’s equal participation, and full involvement in all efforts relating to the maintenance and promotion of peace and security.
Hissong’s presentation is scheduled to be part of the agenda for the 5th annual LREC being held Oct. 14-16, and will feature guest speakers including**Lt. Gen. Gregory M. Guillot**, commander of U.S. Air Forces Central Command, Southwest Asia, as well as **Lt. Gen. Kirk W. Smith**, deputy commander of U.S. Africa Command. To register for LREC, which is free to attend and will be hosted over Microsoft Teams, click**here**.
The professional development podcasts are designed to help communicate and inform Total Force Airmen across the globe on relevant, timely topics related to the recruiting, training, education and force development fields, and can be listened to on the government network on the AETC **website**, or via mobile application as well as on **Apple Podcasts**, Spotify and **Google Play**.
Future episodes are set to cover a wide range of topics, including the AETC Strategic Action Plan, an interview with **Chief Master Sgt. Erik Thompson**, AETC’s new command chief and much more.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



podcast 



AETC 



Air Force Starts Here 



professional development 



JB San Antonio-Randolph 



cultural symposium 



Air University
adc_106b.htm


Exhibit 10.6(b)


 


[Letterhead of Algae Dynamics]


 







 


September 5, 2014


 


Re-: Amendment to Advisory Agreement


 


Reference is made to that certain Advisory Agreement dated March 11, 2014, as amended (the “Agreement”), between Connectus Inc. (“Connectus”) and Algae Dynamics Corporation (formerly known as Converted Carbon Technologies Corp.) (the "Company"). Pursuant to the Agreement, Connectus was entitled to warrants to purchase 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company following a subsequent financing subject to certain vesting provisions of the Agreement. The parties to the Agreement desire to amend the Agreement to fix the number of shares subject the warrants at 625,000 (post-split) common shares pursuant to warrant agreements attached here as Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” attached hereto. Except as explicitly amended by this letter, the Agreement, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect.


 







 



	Connectus Inc.        	 	Algae Dynamics Corporation	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 	 	 
	 	P. Blair Mullin, President   	 	 	Paul Ramsay, President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5387-H5388]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          THE FOREIGN AID BILL

  (Mr. LINDER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, today and through tomorrow and the next day, 
the House takes up a historic foreign affairs bill that for the first 
time in many, many years actually authorizes the spending that we take 
on behalf of the interests of the U.S. policies in respect to foreign 
lands.
  There will be much debate as to whether we are doing it the way other 
people wish us to do it or we are cutting too deeply, but the fact of 
the matter is that less than 1 percent of our entire budget is invested 
in foreign affairs. That is the issue we need to begin to take to the 
American people.
  It surprises me when you ask Americans what they think is the largest 
item in the Federal budget and they consistently say foreign affairs, 
and indeed it is perhaps the smallest. When [[Page H5388]] you ask 
people if we spend too much on foreign affairs, in one recent poll, 79 
percent said yes. The second question was, how much do you think we 
should be spending, and they consistently said about 5 percent, and 
indeed we are spending 1 percent.
  There will be honest debates as to whether we are giving too much 
support for one country or another, but the fact of the matter is it is 
cheaper to support nations in peace than it is to buy more bombers and 
missiles, and I believe that we are on the right track.

                          ____________________
```