alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                 QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis B. Gillings, Chairman of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Dennis B. Gillings
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dennis B. Gillings
                                        Chairman

                                        November 14, 2002
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Date
Exhibit 33.8



|     |  |                                                           
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300
Chicago, IL 60661 312-233-6440
|    
|    

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and for the period
from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the servicing
criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the
Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC
Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the
Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has
concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as
Vendor to Servicer



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|LOGO                                         
|                                             
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
January 23, 2017
#### C. C. Stewart v. Hillebrand & Goldstein.

(No. 2030, Op. Book No. 2, p. 375.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1114. *Charge of court on weight of evidence; promise to pay debt of another.*Suit ujion an open account for goods sold. Defense that the goods were sold to one Knoblock, and the credit given him and not to Stewart, and that Stewart had never promised in writing to pay for them. -Verdict and judgment for plaintiff-. The judge charged the jury, among other things, at the request of the plaintiff: “If, at the time of the purchase of the whisky, Stewart promised to pay for the same, and the credit was given to Stewart and not to Knoblock, then Stewart is liable, even if the promise is not in writing and the amount not charged to Stewart on the books. And further, the subsequent promise, if such was made, by Stewart to pay the debt is to be considered by the jury as matter supporting and sustaining the statement of plaintiff that the credit was given to Stewart.” This charge is assigned as error, and is manifestly erroneous. It does not necessarily follow that because Stew*627art subsequently promised to pay the debt, if the whisky were furnished to Knoblock, that therefore it was furnished on Stewart’s credit originally; and if this were a reasonable deduction, the jury must draw it for themselves without the interference of the court. The charge is very clearly a charge upon the weight of testimony, which the law forbids the court to give. [R. S. 1317.]

June 22, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.
<Page>


                                                    [LOGO]

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration
Statement No. 333-65233 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
on Form N-4, of our report dated February 28, 2003 of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company Variable Account D relating to the financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the
reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of Additional
Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

December 4, 2003
```

  EX-33.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

The Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is responsible for assessing
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has
determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the
servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment for the Period, the Company has complied, in all
material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance for
the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari Gillund
    Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 23, 2012
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         299,908
<SECURITIES>                                    35,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                  422,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               832,573
<PP&E>                                         576,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                 201,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,193,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          525,084
<BONDS>                                         20,910
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,155
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,571,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,193,891
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,250,296
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,322,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (6,715)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (60,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (20,102)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (40,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  16,770
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                436,327
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   412,281
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.56


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2011-3 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party Union Bank, N.A.







Date: June 17, 2013







|/s/ Paul C. Honda | 
|----------------- | 

Paul C. Honda
Vice President and Assistant Secretary

of American Honda Finance Corporation

(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 31 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to equality of rights and reproductive rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to equality of rights and reproductive rights. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 31 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Equality of rights under the law shall 

3 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 

4 State on account of sex. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. Reproductive rights for women under 

6 the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United 

7 States or any State. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to enforce 

9 and implement this article by appropriate legislation. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 4. This amendment shall take effect two 

11 years after the date of ratification.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Katherine
C. Harper, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Tronox Limited (the Registrant); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | [Intentionally Omitted];
| | -- | ------------------------



| | 4. | [Intentionally Omitted];
| | -- | ------------------------



| | 5. | [Intentionally Omitted];
| | -- | ------------------------

Date: March 26, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Katherine C. Harper                                              
|Katherine C. Harper
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF SEPTEMBER 23, 2014

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD75728 Wilber Mateo vs. State of Missouri

WD77129 Jacqueline Easley vs. Division of Employment Security

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD76216 State of Missouri vs. Ramone D. Winters
News United States Air Force
 Greek, US training reaffirms rock-solid friendshipPublished Feb. 5, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Joe W. McFadden
                        
                        
                        52nd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SOUDA BAY, Greece (AFNS) --**
                With the White Mountains of Crete as their backdrop, U.S. and Hellenic air forces F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter aircraft soared to great heights and speeds as part of a continuing flying training deployment (FTD) Jan. 16 through Feb. 13 at Souda Bay, Greece.The training between the U.S. Air Force’s 480th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, deployed from Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, and the Hellenic air force's 115th Combat Wing's 340th and 343rd Fighter Squadrons aims to develop and improve air readiness while expanding strategic and operational ties between the two NATO partners."We both need this training experience because, as NATO allies, our countries could be called upon at any time to project combat air power," said Hellenic air force Col. Ioannis Gerolymos, the 115th CW commander. "These training opportunities help expand relationships with key NATO allies while sustaining our readiness to be fully prepared to meet tomorrow's threats."Approximately 300 personnel from the 52nd Fighter Wing at Spangdahlem AB participated in the deployment in various operational, maintenance, mission support, medical and staff agency capacities. Many of those roles provided Airmen opportunities to work side by side with their Hellenic air force or U.S. Navy counterparts stationed at Souda Bay.The deployment also marks the 480th EFS' second training engagement at Crete since the previous FTD in August 2014. The 52nd FW pilots flew their 18 F-16s, along with those of their Hellenic air force counterparts, to elevations far exceeding the island's highest peak at more than 8,000 feet reaching miles beyond its shorelines, over the Mediterranean Sea."Greece offers unrestricted, live ranges, as well as access to excellent infrastructure and support facilities," said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. David Berkland, the 480th EFS commander. "We are ready to respond to contingencies anywhere, anytime, and that is largely due to the diverse training opportunities afforded by our NATO partners, like this one with our Greek allies."Hellenic air forces 



f-16 



joint 



USAFE 



exercise 480th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron 



Spangdahlem AB 



Germany 



greece Related Links
        US, Greece reinforce proven partnership through airpower
* Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of

this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2274

BETTY T. GORDON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-50)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty T. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Kyle Epps, Hill B.

Wellford, Jr., Wood Walter Lay, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101-12213 (West 1990) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Gordon v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., No. CA-94-

50 (W. D. Va. May 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### M. Rosenbaum et al. v. M. A. Harloe.

(No. 1461, Op. Book No. 3, p. —.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 849. *Married woman; may sue alone, when; abandonment of husband, held sufficient on general demurrer.*The petition alleged as follows: “Plaintiff further represents that she is a married woman, but that her husband has abandoned her, and that she supports herself by her own exertions, and hence brings this suit as a *Jeme sole.” Held,*that this allegation was sufficient on *489general demurrer to entitle the wife to maintain the suit without being joined by her husband. [Harris v. Williams, 44 Tex. 124; Wright v. Hays, 10 Tex. 130; Fullerton v. Doyle, 18 Tex. 3.] The rights and powers of the wife arise from the fact of abandonment, and not from the length of its continuance. It must he apparently a pei’manent desertion. If defendant had specially excepted to the petition because it did not allege that the abandonment'by the husband was permanent, plaintiff would have had the right to amend. Not pointing out specially the defect, plaintiff was not informed thereof, so as to cure the same by amendment. [Kelley v. Whitmore, 41 Tex. 647.]

February 16, 1883.

§ 850. *Separate property of wife liable, when; allegations as to liability held sufficient on general*demurrer. The separate property of the wife is liable for debts only" in cases for necessaries furnished the wife, or on her authority, for herself and her children,, or for the benefit of her separate estate, which are *reasonable*and necessary. A petition which alleges facts from which it is plainly inferable that the debt is one properly chargeable upon the separate property of the wife is sufficient upon general demurrer, although it does not distinctly allege that the debt was *reasonable.*[Harris v. Williams, 44 Tex. 124.]

§851. *Bight of ivife to sue alone; hoiu questioned.*If facts exist which will defeat the right of the wife to sue alone, but such facts do not appear upon the face of the petition, they must he pleaded under oath and proven. The burden is upon the defendant to make good the plea. In this case the suit was brought by the wife alone, who recovered judgment in the court below, and the judgment was affirmed in an oral opinion. Upon a motion, for rehearing, which was refused, a written opinion was delivered embracing the foregoing propositions.

Affirmed.