alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sami S. Abbasi, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/  Sami S. Abbasi                                                              |  |  |  | 
|Sami S. Abbasi                                                                   |  |  |  | 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Dated: March 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 442 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3001, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rections: 

5 (1) In section 201(1), strike 

6 ‘‘$11,045,052,000’’ and insert ‘‘$10,943,840,000’’. 
2 

•HCON 442 EH 

1 (2) In section 202(a), strike ‘‘$11,799,660’’ 

2 and insert ‘‘$11,799,660,000’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 442 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to correct the 

enrollment of the bill S. 3001.
News United States Air Force
 Airmen part of international jump weekPublished May 12, 2014
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jordan Castelan
                        
                        
                        86th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                From May 4-9 a total of 97 foreign and allied partners tested, built and strengthened partnerships during International Jump Week alongside American Airmen and Soldiers in the skies over Ramstein.
With eight European countries joining the event this year the clouds over Alzey landing zone parted ways to a sea of parachutes and a melting pot of service uniforms.
"Jump week is all about building partnership capacities," said Tech. Sgt. Brian Angell, 435th Contingency Response Group personal parachute program manager. "Many of the junior enlisted Airmen and Soldiers here today are getting their first chance to jump with international paratroopers and the experience gained sharing training tactics and procedures are invaluable."
Airmen and Soldiers weren't the only ones sharing jumps for the first time with international partners. Many of the airborne troops from the visiting eight countries also flew into the same first time situation.
"It is always very important to familiarize yourself with partner nation procedures," said Hellenic Air Force Capt. Byron Alivizatos, Search and Rescue Operations Squadron. "These jumps create an opportunity to form well rounded paratroopers and strengthen deployed operations."
The 304 airborne troops that participated tested themselves across three different aircraft platforms, including the C-130J Super Hercules, the MC-130H Talon and a C-17: totaling 401 static-line jumps and 132 high-altitude low-opening jumps across three days.
"Being a piece of this experience was incredibly satisfying," said U.S. Army Pfc. Kelly Orullian, 5th Quartermaster Aerial Delivery parachute rigger. "A large part of what I do is making sure everyone is prepared and confident for their jump. What made this instance special was the chance to work with so many different jumpers from different nations."
Working to create international bonds and friendships was a large part of IJW. Harmonizing 97 jumpers from eight different nations with eight different modus operandi was just as key as the actual jumping.
"As a jump master you are responsible for the lives of the paratroopers inside the aircraft, and that's something I take to heart," said U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Alexander Munoz-Lamos, Special Operations Command Africa air NCO. "It's a great opportunity to link up with our partner nations to improve our relationships within the airborne community. When you're in there you control the aircraft, it doesn't matter what rank they are, it doesn't matter what rank I am."international 



airborne 



jump week 



Ramstein 



paratroopers
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE HARRISON.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          51,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                       296
<INVENTORY>                                    152,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,157,816
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,039,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,016,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,768
<COMMON>                                        15,673
<OTHER-SE>                                    (864,343)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,238
<SALES>                                        369,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               369,052
<CGS>                                          306,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  456,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (96,262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (96,262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (96,778)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-20343) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          MEDICARE BUDGET CUTS

  (Mr. FORD asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. FORD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today because I am receiving a number 
of letters from my constituents back home in addressing the budget cuts 
in the Medicare budget, cuts as being proposed by the new Republican 
majority in this Congress. As I read through all of the letters that my 
constituents are sending to me, they do not feel that it is fair in 
America for the elderly to add on an additional $1,000 in costs and 
additional premiums for Medicare.
  It is true that we must do something about the huge deficits that we 
are faced with, but we know that we ought to share that responsibility 
among all Americans. For the Republicans to think that children and the 
elderly population of this Nation should bear that brunt, it is wrong.
  Just to share a few things with you that I am receiving in the mail, 
senior citizens are saying the need to fix Social Security and Medicare 
can no longer be denied. They acknowledge the fact that we can no 
longer deny it. They say it can be done. And we as Republicans and 
Democrats in this House can work together in a bipartisan spirit to do 
so.
  I do not think that we ought to say to the wealthy and the rich of 
this Nation, yes, just for your $350 billion tax cut, we are going to 
increase and cut the Medicare Program in a fashion that will cause 
burden and undue harm to the elderly population of this country.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-725

In Re: COLUMBUS FERGUSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-92-268-P)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Columbus Ferguson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Columbus Ferguson, a federal inmate, filed a petition for a

writ of mandamus requesting that a federal district judge recuse

himself and that the court reporter be brought before a judicial

panel. In support of his petition, Ferguson provided mere conclusory allegations of perjury and conspiracy of the judge and the

court reporter. Because Ferguson failed to establish any extrajudicial bias, recusal of the district judge is not warranted. See In

re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). Further, because

Ferguson has not shown that he has a clear right to the relief

sought against the court reporter and that no other remedy is

adequate, mandamus relief is not available for his claim regarding

the court reporter. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860

F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We therefore deny Ferguson's petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084,
8th Floor 401 South Tryon St. Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among GS Mortgage Securities
Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association , as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and
Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series GSMS 2011-GC5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in
the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do
hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been
made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|LOGO                                     
|Daniel Bober                             
|Executive Vice President Wells Fargo
Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
HomeSide Lending, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-84179, 333-78629 and 333-45603) on Form S-3 of HomeSide Lending, Inc. of our
report dated October 20, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
HomeSide Lending, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2000 and 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholder's equity,
and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2000 and 1999 and the period
from February 11, 1998 through September 30, 1998, which report appears in the
September 30, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of HomeSide Lending, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
December 27, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2007

                      Engrossed and deemed passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,  That subsection (b) of 
section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking 
out the dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in 
lieu thereof $9,815,000,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Diversified Real Estate III Limited Partnership 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000773679
<NAME> DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          33,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         23,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,988
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (212.56)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 28, 2016

a1212

Order 

Clerk

December 28, 2016

153673-4

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153673-4

COA: 324607; 324608

Wayne CC: 12-004096-FC;

CHARLES FRAZIER YOUNG, 12-004097-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00174-CV

DAVID MENEFEE AND BRENDA MENEFEE,

Appellants

v.

THE SCOGGINS REAL ESTATE TEAM, LLC, 

PENNYBAGS, LLC, SCOGGINS ENTERPRISES, INC., 

HESSCO ROOFING & REMODELING, LLC, 

1ST CHOICE FENCING, INC., JODY SCOGGINS, 

KIM SCOGGINS, AND DEBBIE SCOGGINS,

Appellees

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-2147-5

DISSENTING OPINION

My first question relates to jurisdiction. Does the fact that one of the plaintiffs is 

deceased (died after suit was filed) and the defendant failed to comply with Texas Rule 

of Civil Procedure 151 to have a replacement designated, even if nobody mentions it, 

nevertheless prevent the trial court’s judgment from being final? And if the defendant 
Menefee v. The Scoggins Real Estate Team, LLC, et al. Page 2

failed to comply with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 151, does that not prevent the trial 

court’s dismissal for want of prosecution under other authority because there is a very 

specific rule about how to obtain dismissal when a plaintiff dies after the trial court 

obtains jurisdiction of the person that is the plaintiff? Does this at least warrant a “wequestion-our jurisdiction” inquiry? See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. The most fundamental 

problem is upon whom is a motion to dismiss, or notice of intent to dismiss, for want of 

prosecution going to be served if the party over whom the court had jurisdiction has 

died?

I will also say that under the circumstances, during the pandemic where there was 

the lack of criminal prosecution of the defendant by Texas/McLennan County for such a 

long period of time, weighing the pitfalls that arise in trying to proceed in a civil case 

when the defendant has a criminal prosecution pending for the same conduct, and

considering the chaos created by the burden of the 50+ emergency Covid orders upon the 

entire judicial system, and due to those emergency orders, the resulting inability to hold 

a jury trial in the criminal as well as the civil case (can we take judicial notice of the local 

rules and emergency orders during the pandemic), plus the defendant’s failure to avail 

itself of the benefits and protection of Rule 151 to get to a dismissal, if appropriate, I 

would find the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ case to be an abuse of discretion. I respectfully 

dissent.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Menefee v. The Scoggins Real Estate Team, LLC, et al. Page 3

Dissenting Opinion delivered and filed May 31, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 65 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 65

 Providing for the appointment of John W. McCarter as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2007

  Ms. Matsui (for herself, Mr. Becerra, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of John W. McCarter as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Walter E. Massey of Georgia is 
filled by the appointment of John W. McCarter of Illinois. The 
appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```