alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.32

ENDOCARE                                7 Studebaker - Irvine - California 92618
EXTENDING LIFE EVERYDAY
                                        Tel:  949.595.4770
                                        Fax:  949.595.4788
                                        Email:  info@endocare.org
                                        Web Site:  www.endocare.org

                                        A Publicly Traded Company (NASDAQ:ENDO)



MEMO

To:      Jerry Anderson

From:    Paul Mikus
         CEO & Chairman

Date:    June 10, 1999


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am pleased to offer you 175,000 shares of Endocare stock at a price of $5 1/8
per share.

For the issuance of such shares, you will provide Endocare with a full recourse
promissory note due in 4 years at approximately 5.3% interest due annually. In
the event you have fulfilled your performance criteria noted below, on each
anniversary date of your employment, 25% of the principal and interest amount of
your promissory note to the Company will be forgiven.

The performance criteria is as follows:

                        On an annual basis, mutually agreed upon minimum
                        performance targets have been achieved.


6-11-99

                                      /s/ Jerry W. Anderson
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Jerry W. Anderson
                                    President A.M.P.
                                    V.P. Sales Endocare

- Page 1
#### J. M. Fort v. Cameron & Moore.

(No. 1585, Op. Book No. 2, p. 374.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§1112. *Liquidated damages;penalty.*Appellants contracted to build appellee a house, and to finish the same within a specified time, or, in default thereof, to pay $10 per day for every day the building remained unfinished after the time specified for its completion. *Held,*the intention of the parties manifestly was that the $10 per day should be considered as liquidated damages. What,, the damages were which, upon a failure to complete the-building in time, Port might suffer, would have been um-certain and difficult of computation. Here no sum in *626gross is fixed, but a rate per day for the delay, not in itself unreasonable, and graduating the damages by the period of continuance of failure to comply with the terms of the contract. Agreements of this kind have always been regarded not as imposing penalties, but as stipulating for liquidated damages. [2 Sedgwick on Dam. 223; Durst v. Swift, 11 Tex. 273; 11 Barb. 127; 11 Abb. N. S (N. Y.) 59; 4 Daley, 554; 24 How. 317.]

June 15, 1881.

§ 1118. *New trial; newly discovered evidence.*When the newly discovered evidence for which a new trial is sought is merely cumulative, and not likely to produce a different result on another tidal, it is not error to refuse the new trial. [Madden v. Shapard, 3 Tex. 49.]

Affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 Readout of Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall’s travel to IndiaPublished March 31, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **NEW DELHI (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force **Frank Kendall** traveled to India March 21 to discuss building on the rapid growth in bilateral security cooperation and explore ways to further operationalize the U.S.-India Major Defense Partnership.

Kendall met with External Affairs Minister Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar; Foreign Secretary Vinay Mohan Kwatra; Deputy National Security Advisor Vikram Misri; Defence Secretary Shri Giridhar Aramane; Joint Secretary for International Cooperation Vishwesh Negi; and Air Force Air Chief Marshal Vivek Ram Chaudhari.

During these meetings, Kendall emphasized India’s status as a vital strategic partner to the U.S. and stressed the Department of the Air Force commitment to deepening defense and security cooperation. The two sides further shared perspectives that aim to elevate and expand the strategic technology partnership and defense industrial cooperation. The leaders discussed the possible expansion of information sharing, ways to enhance space cooperation, and potential co-development opportunities under the new U.S.-India Initiative for Critical and Emerging Technologies and U.S.-India Defense Technology and Trade Initiative.

Kendall also highlighted the value of exchanges, underscoring the mutually beneficial aspects of increased personnel exchanges and liaison officer opportunities.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Frank Kendall 



India 



bilateral security cooperation 



partnerships 



U.S.-India Major Defense Partnership 



information sharing 



space cooperation
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1057]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

ELIMINATE THE MARRIAGE PENALTY FOR THE EXCLUSION OF GAIN ON THE SALE OF 
             A PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE BY AN INDIVIDUAL OVER 55

                                 ______

                          HON. RICHARD E. NEAL

                            of massachusetts

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 17, 1995
  Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, today, I introduced 
legislation to correct an inequity in on our current tax system. Under 
current law, an individual over the age of 55 is allowed a one-time 
exclusion of capital gain on the sale of a principal residence. This 
one-time exclusion invokes a marriage penalty. This legislation would 
eliminate the marriage penalty for the one-time exclusion of gain on 
the sale of a principal residence.
  For example, two individuals over the age of 55 who decide to marry 
and sell their homes would only receive an exclusion of $125,000. 
Whereas, if they did not marry and sold their homes they each would be 
able to receive an exclusion for $125,000. This legislation addresses 
this problem. The legislation eliminates the marriage penalty by 
disregarding elections made before the date of marriage or elections 
made on homes sold after the date of marriage, but purchased before the 
marriage.
  Fairness is an important element of tax policy. The current policy on 
the one-time exclusion assists individuals who are approaching 
retirement and it is a valuable exclusion. Our Tax Code should be fair 
and not discriminate against basic values such as marriage. The 
decision to marry should not be based on financial reasons.
  I urge you to correct this inequity and support this legislation.
  

                          ____________________
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# CMSAF visits Chief's Orientation Course highlighting readiness, people, culture

              - Published  Feb. 17, 2022
              -                             By Senior Airman Rhonda Smith                                                    
              - Air University Public Affairs

**MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --  **

The Air Force’s newest chief master sergeant-selects were invited to participate in the Chief’s Orientation Course on behalf of Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force **JoAnne S. Bass** while at Gunter Annex, **Maxwell Air Force Base**, Feb.15-18.  The event brings together all of the chief master sergeant-selects from around the globe, introduces the group to each other as a source to learn and lean on, and provides an opportunity for them to connect with Air Force senior leaders to help prepare them for life as a chief master sergeant.  The orientation will focus on three areas: readiness, people and culture. 

• Readiness - stresses the shift to integrated deterrence with a focus on understanding China and Russia. 

• People - focuses on modernizing enlisted force development to retain Airmen and Guardians. 

• Culture - speaks to building a service that is inclusive and allows members to thrive.  

This year, 495 CMSgt-selects will hear remarks from Bass and Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. CQ Brown, Jr.**

“Throughout my career there was a steady learning curve from Airman basic all the way to chief,” Bass said. “Once I made chief, that learning curve went into overdrive. It’s important to understand that who you are today pales in comparison to who you will be two years from now.” 

The goal of the orientation is for the selects to further develop a strategic mindset, have a greater knowledge base on the tools and resources available to be effective on command teams and to care for Airmen, and to build a lifetime connection with their chief master sergeant peers.

LRUSAFAFAir ForceCMSAFChief Master Sgt. of the Air ForceJoAnne S. BassChief Orientation SymposiumCMSgt-selectreadinesspeopleculture
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TRAVIS JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 14, 2015

No. 04

- 14

- 00606

- CV

ARGO GROUP US, INC. , Colony Management Services, Inc., Colony Insurance Company, Colony National Insurance Company, Colony Specialty Insurance Company, Colony Agency Services, Inc., and Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.

, Appellants

v.

Louis D. LEVINSON , International Financial Group, Inc., Guilford Specialty Group, Inc., Guilford Insurance Company, and The Burlington Insurance Company

, Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 09550 Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT. It is ORDERED that appellees recover th eir costs of appeal from appellants.

It is so ORDERED on January 14, 2015

.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of January, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


October 21, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Defensive 50 Equities Trust,
Series 1


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Defensive 50 Equities Trust, Series 1 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on October 20, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-198755) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO_______________ 


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
SCWC-18-0000018 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. VICENTE KOTEKAPIKA HILARIO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000018; 5PC111000023) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Rec ktenwald, C.J., Na kayama, McKenna, P ollack, a nd Wilson , JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Vicente Kotekapika Hilario’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on August 1, 2019, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 23, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000018 23-SEP-2019 01:22 PM
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Caring for Families, Lifestyle Medicine, Workspace AnywherePublished March 29, 2024
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, senior enlisted advisors from the Air Force and Space Force testify to Congress on the importance of quality-of-life initiatives, medical experts discuss the well-being of service members and the role of lifestyle medicine on Great Power Competition, and an IT solution to enable government applications and websites from any device. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



CMSAF 



CMSSF 



Military Health System 



Lifestyle and Performance medicine 



Hypori Halo 



Workspace Anywhere Related Links
        DAF SELs testify on importance of caring for service members, families
            
            AF medical leaders held inaugural Lifestyle and Performance Medicine Summit
            
            Air Force partners with Army to explore secure mobile access platform from any device while ensuring user privacy
exhibit_10-15.htm











Exhibit 10.15


 


Schedule of Omitted Documents


of EZTrader, Inc.







Each of the following lenders, listed in the table below, has entered into Convertible Loan Agreement dated February 2014 between such lender and the Company. These agreements have not been filed as an exhibit pursuant to Instruction 2 of Item 601 of Regulation S-K; these documents are substantially identical in all material respects to Exhibit 10.11 to this Registration Statement on Form 10, except as noted below:


 






	Lender	 	 	

Loan amount

	 	 	 	
Shares

	 	 	 	
Exercise 


price

	 
	
Gaia Services Limited

	 	$	1,000,000	 	 	 	2,857,143	 	 	$	0.35	 
	
HRA Srl

	 	$	136,560	 	 	 	392,114	 	 	$	0.35	 
	
Alfredo Caturano

	 	$	300,000	 	 	 	857,143	 	 	$	0.35	 
	
Pairstech Premium Fund

	 	$	500,000	 	 	 	1,428,571	 	 	$	0.35	 
	
Philipp Lehner

	 	$	249,197	 	 	 	714,286	 	 	$	0.35	 
	
Paolo De Spirt

	 	$	99,679	 	 	 	285,714	 	 	$	0.35	 
	
GAIA Services

	 	$	497,524	 	 	 	1,428,571	 	 	$	0.35	 
	  	 	$	2,782,960	 	 	 	7,963,542
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5237]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             MEDICARE CHECK

  (Mr. GUTIERREZ asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Mr. Speaker, this country once had a system of checks 
and balances. Now with the Republican budget scam we have checks 
without balances. Here is one check, Mr. Speaker, a big check, a 
whopping $228 billion check made out by the senior citizens of this 
country who face a massive cut in Medicare, and who is this check 
written out to, Mr. Speaker? To the wealthiest, who will rake in 
billions thanks to the Republican budget scam.
  Yes, the oldest Americans in this country will face $3,500 in out-of-
pocket medical bills, while the richest Americans will put $20,000 into 
their pockets. What a shame.
  But big checks are nothing new to the GOP. Think about all of the big 
campaign checks they got in 1994.
  So, Mr. Speaker, go ahead and protect the wealthy and the powerful, 
and we Democrats will protect the health of the powerless.
  Go ahead and help those who helped finance your victory in the last 
election, while we Democrats will help those seniors who led us all to 
victory in World War II.
  Seeing this huge check makes me realize that the Republicans must 
have checked their compassion and decency at the door, Mr. Speaker.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6837]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Chair advises the Senate that, under the 
previous order, leadership time has been reserved.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Microbics, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert Brehm
---------------------------
Robert Brehm
August 19, 2002
Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

|  | (1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-201459) of Franklin Street Properties Corp, and |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91680) pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of Franklin Street Properties Corp.;  |
|--|-----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

of our reports dated February 14, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Franklin Street Properties Corp. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Franklin Street Properties Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Boston, Massachusetts

February 14, 2017

----
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Airmen and Guardians in the Fight, Cyber and IT Warrant OfficersPublished Feb. 23, 2024
                        
                        By Senior Airman Saomy Sabournin
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week's look Around the Air Force highlights the Department's senior enlisted advisors plans to empower and equip Airmen and Guardians to prepare for Great Power Competition, and the Air Force reintroducing the rank of warrant officer for information technology and cyber career fields. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



CMSAF JoAnne Bass 



CMSSF John Bentivegna 



great power competition 



reoptimizing the force 



AFA 



AWS24 



SF 



space force 



SECAF Frank Kendall 



Gen. David Allvin 



Gen. Chance Saltzman 



warrant officer 



cyber 



information technology 



24 key decisions 



modernization Related Links
        DAF senior enlisted advisors discuss Airmen, Guardians in the fight
            
            Air Force to re-introduce warrant officer rank, other major changes
#### James BILYEU *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 98-1480

10 S.W.3d 105

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Motion for Permission to File Belated Brief granted February 17, 2000

Concurring opinion delivered February 17, 2000

*Hurst Law Offices,*by: Q. *Byrum Hurst, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Mark Pryor,*Att’y Gen., by: O. *Milton Fine II,*Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Robert L. Brown, Justice,

concurring. I agree to grant the State’s motion for permission to file belated brief. I am troubled, however, by the five-month gap between the filing of appellant’s brief on August 16, 1999, and the tender of the State’s brief on January 24, 2000, especially since the appellant apparently is in prison.1 The State did not receive a copy of the appellant’s brief after it was filed. But the State, no doubt, did receive a copy of the briefing schedule from the Supreme Court Clerk, showing that the appellant’s brief was due in August 1999. This should have alerted the State to determine whether the appellant’s brief had indeed been filed. Had the State checked, this considerable delay in moving ahead on this appeal could have been avoided.

1

 This is a Rule 37 appeal, and in order to file a Rule 37 petition, a petitioner must be in custody. *See*Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1; *Bohanan v. State,*336 Ark. 367, 985 S.W.2d 708 (1999).