alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
of China Cable and Communication, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned
knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  November 23, 2004                    /s/  Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 4.2(a)


        LIST OF PURCHASERS WHO ENTERED INTO ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT RIGHT
                 REFERENCED IN EXHIBIT 4.2 WITH THE REGISTRANT


1.   Vertical Ventures, LLC
2.   Crescent International LTD
3.   Smithfield Fiduciary LLC
4.   Truk Opportunity Fund, LLC
5.   JAS Securities, LLC
6.   AIG DKR Soundshore Private Investors Holding Fund Ltd.
7.   OTAPE Investments LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2007

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 110-92 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and 
inserting ``December 21, 2007''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
  of Heritage Management, Inc.

We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference,  in this  Registration
Statement on Form SB-1 of Heritage Management, Inc. of our report dated June 30,
2003 relating to the financial statements of Heritage Management, Inc. appearing
in the Registrant's  Form SB-1 of Heritage  Management,  Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2002.




/s/ Malone & Bailey, PLLC
-------------------------
    Malone & Bailey, PLLC
    www.malone-bailey.com
    Houston, Texas


December 8, 2003
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2011-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
___________ _, 2003



Broadband Capital Management LLC
805 Third Avenue
15th Floor
New York, New York 10022

                  Re:      Great Wall Acquisition Corporation
                           ----------------------------------

Gentlemen:

                  This letter will confirm the agreement of the undersigned to
each purchase warrants ("Warrants") of Great Wall Acquisition Corporation
("Company") included in the units ("Units") being sold in the Company's initial
public offering ("IPO") upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. Each
Unit is comprised of one share of Common Stock and two Warrants. The shares of
Common Stock and Warrants will not be separately tradeable until 90 days after
the effective date of the Company's IPO unless Broadband Capital Management LLC
("Broadband") informs the Company of its decision to allow earlier separate
trading.

                  Each of the undersigned agrees that this letter agreement
constitutes an irrevocable order for Broadband to purchase for each of the
undersigned's account within the twenty trading-day period commencing on the
date separate trading of the Warrants commences ("Separation Date") up to
500,000 Warrants at market prices not to exceed $0.65 per Warrant ("Maximum
Warrant Purchase"). Broadband (or such other broker dealer(s) as Broadband may
assign the order to) agrees to fill such order in such amounts and at such times
as it may determine, in its sole discretion, during the twenty trading-day
period commencing on the Separation Date. Broadband further agrees that it will
not charge the undersigned any fees and/or commissions with respect to such
purchase obligation.

                  Each of the undersigned may notify Broadband that all or part
of his respective Maximum Warrant Purchase will be made by an affiliate of the
undersigned (or another person or entity introduced to Broadband by the
undersigned (a "Designee")) who (or which) has an account at Broadband and, in
such event, Broadband will make such purchase on behalf of said affiliate or
Designee; provided, however, that each of the undersigned hereby agrees to make
payment of the purchase price of such purchase in the event that the affiliate
or Designee fails to make such payment.

                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Justin Tang



                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Kin Shing Li
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

t1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143784 

PAULA PASCHAL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143784 

 COA: 302636 

WCAC: 09-000065 

CITY OF LANSING, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### M. J. Mills v. John Hackett.

(No. 1480, Op. Book No. 2, p. 760.)

Appeal from Fort Bencl County.

March 3, 1883.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 845. *New trial; motion for, in justice's court, need not be sworn to, when, etc.*A motion for a new trial in justice’s court, upon the ground that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence, is not required under the law to be sworn to. [R. S. 1623.]

§ 846. *Appeal bond from justice's to county court; misdescription of judgment; conditioned in the alternative.*The appeal bond, in describing the judgment, omitted to mention the sum of |2 adjudged as damages, but in all other respects fully and correctly described the judgment appealed from. It was conditioned that the appellant “shall prosecute his appeal to effect, or ■(instead of “and”) shall pay off and satisfy the judgment or (instead of “and”) decree that may be rendered,” etc. *Held,*1. The judgment of the justice’s court is described with a degree of particularity which leaves no doubt of its identity. The omission in the bond of the §2 damages is not a misdescription. 2. The ■conditions of the bond are not in the precise language of the statute [R. S. 1639], but they are substantially sufficient. [Robinson v. Brinson, 20 Tex. 438.] The appeal was erroneously dismissed.

Reversed and remanded.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 2288

In re: DAN BRITTON HODGES, JR. , Petitioner

.

No. 20
- 2291

In re: TRAVIS LAMAR WALL , Petitioner.

No. 20
- 2293

In re: LAMARE P. JORDAN , Petitioner

.

No. 20
- 2294

In re: KUNTA KENTA REDD , Petitioner

.

On Petition s for a Writ of Mandamus. ( 3:17

- cr
- 00037

- REP

- 1 ; 2:17

- cr
- 00034

- RAJ

- RJK

- 1 ; 7:08

- cr
- 00043

- D

- 1 )2 Submitted : February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition s denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Dan Britton Hodges, Jr. , Travis Lamar Wall , Lamare P. Jordan , Kunta Kenta Redd , Petitioner s Pro Se.

Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Dan Britton Hodges, Jr. , Travis Lamar Wall , Lamare P. Jordan , and Kunta Kenta Redd have filed petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking orders from this court directing federal officials to take steps to protect inmates at the Federal Correctional Institution
Ashland from COVID

- 19. We conclude that petitioners are not entitled to mandamus
relief.
Mandamus rel ief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018 ). Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a cl ear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by petitioners is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petitions for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION S DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 92

Recognizing and commending Dr. Robert Meaders and all of the volunteers 
 and contributors of Operation Helmet for their efforts in sending out 
35,000 helmet upgrade kits to members of the United States Armed Forces 
                   deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2007

 Ms. Hooley (for herself, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. Ortiz) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and commending Dr. Robert Meaders and all of the volunteers 
 and contributors of Operation Helmet for their efforts in sending out 
35,000 helmet upgrade kits to members of the United States Armed Forces 
                   deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Whereas, since March 2004, Operation Helmet has provided over 35,000 free helmet 
        upgrade kits to members of the United States Armed Forces deployed in 
        Iraq or Afghanistan;
Whereas these helmet upgrades offer a greater level of protection for members of 
        the Armed Forces by providing a better-fitting helmet and increased 
        shock absorption, decreasing the chance of brain injury from improvised 
        explosive devices, bombs, vehicle accidents, and other injuries;
Whereas Dr. Robert Meaders and the entire staff of Operation Helmet are all 
        unpaid volunteers who began Operation Helmet with the sole intention of 
        providing needed equipment to members of the Armed Forces; and
Whereas Operation Helmet depends on donations for funds to procure the helmet 
        upgrade kits and allows Americans to demonstrate their gratitude to 
        members of the Armed Forces serving in the Global War on Terror: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress recognizes and commends Dr. Robert Meaders and all of the 
volunteers and contributors of Operation Helmet for their efforts in 
sending out 35,000 helmet upgrade kits to members of the United States 
Armed Forces deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
                                 <all>
```
CERIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Triton Pacific
Investment Corporation, Inc., (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), we, Craig J. Faggen and Michael L. Carroll., Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                            
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                       |    |                        
|---------------------- | -- | -----------------------
|                       |    |                        
|Dated: March
 29, 2013 | By | /s/ Craig J.
 Faggen   
|                       |    | Craig J.
 Faggen       
|                       |    | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |    |                        
|                       | By | /s/ Michael
 L. Carroll
|                       |    | Michael L.
 Carroll    
|                       |    | Chief Financial Officer

68

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 299 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 299

  To prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of 
    section 642(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
                      Responsibility Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2013

Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. Sessions) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of 
    section 642(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
                      Responsibility Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION OF COPS FUNDING FOR SANCTUARY CITIES.

    None of the amounts appropriated in any Act for the Community 
Oriented Policing Services Program may be used in contravention of 
section 642(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1373(a)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-205929) of Cynapsus Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”), of
our report dated March 8, 2016, relating to the Company’s consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31,
2015 and 2014, and the Company’s consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, which appear in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.



| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| |                                   
| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP             
| |                                   
| | Chartered Professional Accountants
| | Licensed Public Accountants       

Toronto, Canada

March 9, 2016
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 79 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2007 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. WYNN, and Mr. WOLF) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES 

4 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS. 

5 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa6 tion (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’) 

7 shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box 

8 derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on June 16, 2007, 

9 or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of RepVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:19 Mar 07, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC79.IH HC79

ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 79 IH 

1 resentatives and the Committee on Rules and Administra2 tion of the Senate may jointly designate. 

3 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS. 

4 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall 

5 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged 

6 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi7 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and 

8 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall 

9 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

10 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

11 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT. 

12 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association 

13 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject 

14 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage, 

15 sound amplification devices, and other related structures 

16 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car17 ried out under this resolution. 

18 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

19 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

20 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar21 rangements that may be required to carry out the event 

22 under this resolution. 

23 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

24 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce25 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 79 IH 

1 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise2 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

3 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

4 Grounds, with respect to the event to be carried out under 

5 this resolution. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41836 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MISAEL ANDRADE-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-928-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Misael Andrade-Ortiz (Andrade) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Andrade received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.