alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Chas. and Sam O’Neil v. Garrett Davis.

(No. 2559, Op. Book No. *4,*p. —.)

Appeal from Clay County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 415. *Damages; measure of, in actions for tort or trespass.*In actions for damages resulting from a tort or from a trespass upon personal property, the measure of damage is not always the saíne as where the action is *ex contractu.*In torts the wrongdoer may be liable for remote consequences, provided they were probable to result from the wrong, or are the direct and natural results of it; the limit of such liability depending upon the aggravation and the motives of the wrongdoer, or the degree of negligence or malice manifested by the circumstances connected with the tort. [Field on Dam. secs. 32 and 48; Sedg. on Dam. 79 and 88; 2 Pars, on Cont. 455-457.] Plaintiff claimed value of his time for forty-one days spent in hunting for the horses after they were turned out of the pasture, and was allowed to introduce evidence on this point, and the- court instructed the jury that he was entitled to recover such damages if proved. We cannot say that the court erred in submitting to the jury this item of evidence. We think it was a matter properly left to the jury to determine from all the evidence in the case. [Bennett v. Lockwood, 20 Wend. 223; Miller v. Garling, 12 How. Pr. R. 203; Cole v. Tucker, 6 Tex. 266, and authorities cited.]

§ 416. *Sale of leased premises; effect of, on lease..*Where D. leased the pasture from P. for the year, he had a legal right to use it during the year, and a sale by P. of the pasture or a portion of it would not destroy or affect D.’s rights under the lease. Such sale would pass the land subject to the right of pasturage in D., and D. being-*184on the land at the time of such sale, and using it for pasturage, the purchaser would be charged with notice of his rights, and would take the land subject to such rights.

May 9, 1883.

§417. *Contributory negligence.*It is the duty of a person to use ordinary care and reasonable means to prevent an injury and the consequences of it, and he can only recover damages for such losses as could not by such care and means he avoided; and if a party in any material manner contributes to the injury received, he cannot recover for such losses as result from his own or from his own and another’s fault. [Field on Dam. secs. 32, 167, 170; Brandon v. Manuf’g Co. 51 Tex. 121.]

§ 418. *Agent;' unauthorized act of, not binding upon principal.*A person who neither authorizes nor ratifies a wilful trespass committed by his agent, acting beyond the scope of his legitimate authority, is not liable therefor. [Gilleland v. Drake, 36 Tex. 676; Story on Agency, secs. 318, 456; Cooley on Torts, 333 et seq.; Ingram v. Linn, 4 Tex. 266; Ingram v. Atkinson, 4 Tex. 270.] This rule should have been submitted to .the jury under the evidence to enable them to determine the liability of Chas. O’Neil for the act of his agent, Sam O’Neil, in turning the horses out of the pasture.

Reversed and remanded.
KBH - 08.31.2014 - Exhibit 10.50






Exhibit 10.50





AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED KB HOME 1999 INCENTIVE PLAN
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Amended and Restated KB Home 1999 Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is effective July 17, 2014 and is applicable to the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between KB Home (the “Company”) and [___________] (the “Optionee”) dated [_______]. 
The Agreement is hereby amended to add the following provisions:
“Notwithstanding any other term hereof, if the termination of Optionee’s employment with the Company or its Subsidiaries prior to the date established pursuant to Section 4(i) is as a result of Optionee’s death or Disability, the Option shall be exercisable until the date established pursuant to Section 4(i).
For these purposes, “Disability” means (i) “disability” as defined in any employment agreement then in effect between Optionee and the Company or applicable Subsidiary or (ii) if not defined therein, or if there shall be no such agreement, “disability” as defined in the long-term disability plan then maintained by the Company or applicable Subsidiary, or (iii) if there shall be no plan, a medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six (6) months, where such impairment causes Optionee to be unable to perform in all material respects his or her duties and responsibilities to the Company or applicable Subsidiary or any substantially similar duties and responsibilities.  The Company shall have the sole right to determine whether Optionee’s termination of employment constitutes a Disability.”
Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement remains unaltered and in full force and effect.  


KB HOME








By: __________________________________________
Thomas F. Norton
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of VII Peaks Co-Optivist
Income BDC II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Cecilia Shea, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated this 11th day of March,
    2014 | By: | /s/ Cecilia Shea                                                                                                               
|-------------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                       |     | Cecilia Shea                                                                                                                   
|                                       |     | Chief Financial Officer,
        Treasurer and Secretary
        (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
News United States Air Force
 Tour lengths increase for certain first-term overseas assignmentsPublished Feb. 11, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jeremy L. Mosier
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                Effective March 1, Airmen and Guardians overseas tour lengths are now 36 months for first-term unaccompanied permanent assignments at certain overseas locations.
Unaccompanied Airmen and Guardians, both enlisted and officers, who are on their first permanent duty assignment will serve 36 months at the following**Pacific Air Forces** and **United States Air Forces in Europe** locations:RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom; RAF Lakenheath, U.K.;  RAF Alconbury, U.K.; RAF Croughton, U.K.; London, Menwith Hill, U.K.; Fairford, U.K.; Welford, U.K.; Molesworth, U.K.; Aviano Air Base, Italy; Stavenger AB, Norway; Ramstein AB, Germany; Kaiserslautern, Germany; Sembach, Germany; Vogelweh, Germany; Landstuhl, Germany; Kapaun, Germany; Einsiedlerhof, Germany; Spangdahlem AB, Germany; Kadena AB, Japan; Misawa AB, Japan; and Yokota AB, Japan.
An unaccompanied overseas tour is a tour served overseas without command-sponsored dependents when dependents are authorized at that location.
“During these moves, service members not only have to adjust to their new jobs, but also to a new culture and country, which takes time,” said**Lt. Gen. Brian T. Kelly**, deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel and services. “A 24-month tour was not adequate for our new Airmen and Guardians to thrive, nor was it enough time to provide the continuity needed for the unit. The change was made to support the mission and to ensure our members receive a longer transitional period.”The new tour length provides the unit with more time to train and develop the service member, and it provides stability during the member’s first few years in the Department of the Air Force, Kelly said.
During the initial assignment briefing, orders officials will inform affected members of the new 36-month tour length.
This policy does not apply to retrainees, crossflows and prior service members who receive a commission. The overseas tour lengths for accompanied service members remain the same, 36 or 48 months, depending on the tour type.For more information on the changes to tour length, visit**AFI 36-2110**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



tour lengths 



overseas duty locations 



PACAF 



USAFE 



One Air Force 



time on station 



readiness 



force management 



Personnel Management 



Airmen 



guardians 



Pacific Air Forces 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12258 and <greek-i>12259]


Iowa Disaster Number IA-00026

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa (FEMA-
1930-DR), dated 07/29/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2010 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 09/09/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/27/2010.
    Economic Injury (Eidl) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/29/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Iowa, 
dated 07/29/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as 
adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Henry.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-23281 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 311 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability 

and feasibility of designating sites in the Lower Mississippi River Area in the State of Louisiana as a unit 

of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 311 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lower Mississippi 

3 River Area Study Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ in9 cludes Fort St. Philip, Fort Jackson, the Head of 

10 Passes, and any related and supporting historical, 

11 cultural, and recreational resources located in 

12 Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. 

13 SEC. 3. STUDY. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the 

15 date on which funds are made available to carry out this 

16 Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the State of Lou17 isiana and other interested organizations, shall complete 

18 a special resource study that evaluates— 

19 (1) the national significance of the study area; 

20 and 

21 (2) the suitability and feasibility of designating 

22 the study area as a unit of the National Park Sys23 tem. 

24 (b) CRITERIA.—In conducting the study under sub25 section (a), the Secretary shall use the criteria for the 

26 study of areas for potential inclusion in the National Park 
3 

†S 311 ES

1 System in section 8(c) of National Park System General 

2 Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)). 

3 (c) CONTENT.—The study described in subsection (a) 

4 shall— 

5 (1) include cost estimates for the potential ac6 quisition, development, operation, and maintenance 

7 of the study area; and 

8 (2) identify alternatives for the management, 

9 administration, and protection of the study area. 

10 SEC. 4. AGREEMENT; DONATIONS. 

11 The study described in section 3 shall not be con12 ducted until the date on which— 

13 (1) the Secretary enters into an agreement with 

14 a State, unit of local government, or other entity to 

15 conduct the study using non-Federal funds; or 

16 (2) the Secretary receives a donation of an 

17 amount of non-Federal funds sufficient to pay the 

18 cost of conducting the study. 

Passed the Senate July 9, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 311 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the 

and for other purposes. Louisiana as a unit of the National Park System, the Lower Mississippi River Area in the State of suitability and feasibility of designating sites in
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
"Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor")
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of October 21, 2011 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American
Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2011-3 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2014, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 23rdday of May, 2014.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
#### Kelly Rogers v. J. Watson.

(No. 2751, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Falls County.

June 6, 1883.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 382. *Contributory negligence; proof of, may be made under the general issue.*While the authorities are somewhat conflicting, we think the rule may be considered as well settled, that it is not necessary to set up contributory negligence of plaintiff in a special plea, but that such negligence may be proved by the defendant under the general issue. [G Wait’s Act. & Def. sec. G, p. 600; Thomp. on Neg. p. 1179, sec. 26, and cases cited.]

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Air Force Flu Fighters, MTIs Return to Academy, Pilot QualificationPublished Feb. 14, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Marqus Williams
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force features how the Air Force is aiding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with fighting the flu, the Air Force Academy’s move to bring back Military Training Instructors, and the Air Force’s efforts to identify the best potential pilots for training. (Hosted by Senior Airman Marqus Williams)





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
-Academy brings back MTIs, refocuses on training fundamentals
- Panel: Overcoming the National Pilot Shortage
- AFRL’s Epidemiology Lab supports world health officials in flu vaccine developmentFeatured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Airmen 



pilots 



pilot 



PCS 



Academy 



USAF Academy 



MTI 



MTIs 



flu 



influenza 



Flu season 



vaccine 



virus
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 6, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6095.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, October 6, 2010, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Timothy 
Shepard. For more information, please contact Mr. Shepard at 1-888-912-
1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, 
Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22555 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Hanscom AFB team awards long-range radar integration contract with production optionsPublished April 7, 2021
                        
                        By 66th Air Base Group Public Affairs
                **HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --**
                The Theater Battle Control Division, headquartered at **Hanscom Air Force Base**, awarded an $8.4 million **integration contract** to Lockheed Martin Corp. March 26 as part of the Three Dimensional Expeditionary Long-Range Radar Rapid Prototyping program.
Program officials said the main intent of the integration effort is to develop, test and field interfaces allowing the radar system to transmit data to other command and control nodes.
“The 3DELRR team is using a Middle Tier Acquisition approach (SpeedDealer) to rapidly procure and field long-range radar systems to the warfighter,” said Col. Michael Harm, the division’s senior materiel leader.
“SpeedDealer” is an acquisition strategy unveiled in January 2020, to take advantage of advances in technology to replace the TPS-75 radar with production-ready systems. The 3DELRR team selected Lockheed for integration after evaluating three commercially available, production-ready, and deployable long-range systems during a series of **live-fly demonstrations** this past September.
The team is currently evaluating other offers and could award a second integration contract in the coming months if an agreement can be reached that’s in the best interest of the Air Force, said Lt. Col. Matthew Judge, 3DELRR deputy program manager. As no procurement funds are currently available, the potential of a second integration award would maintain competitive pressure through the next year until funds are available, allowing the program office to provide the best support to the warfighter.
“If we do award another integration contract, while we intend to award production options to only one of the companies next year, our strategy allows us to award to multiple companies if that makes the most sense,” Judge said. “We are excited to be moving forward with providing the warfighter a radar to detect modern threats.”
The current contract includes production options for up to 35 state-of-the-art long-range radar systems.
The team expects the selected system or systems to be fully deployable by 2024.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



PEO Digital 



3DELRR 



TPS-75 



radar 



SpeedDealer 



modernization 



innovation 



readiness 



Hanscom AFB 



Theater Battle Control Division 



C2 



Command and Control
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-80,819-02

EX P ARTE ALVIN EUGENE HINES, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 31047-B IN THE 3 DISTRICT COURT R D F ROM AND ERSON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convic t ed o f murder and sentenc ed to six ty year s’ imprisonment. His appea l was dismiss ed for want of jurisdiction. Hines v. State , No. 12-13-00325- CR (Tex. App.—Tyler Nov. 21, 2013) (not designated f or publication). Applicant contends that his counsel rendere d ineffe ctive assist ance beca use counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. The trial court obtained a response from one of Applicant’s two trial lawyers, and held a live hearing at which Applicant testified. The habea s co urt found that neither2

lawyer rende red ineffe ctive assistance of counsel, that “notice of appea l was not filed timely due to [Appli cant’ s] own actions and conduct,” and that Applicant was responsible for the denial of direc t appea l. Neve rtheless, the court conclude d that Applicant “should be allowed to pursue an out of time appea l.” The court’s finding s that Applicant was responsible for an y failure to perf ect appea l are supported by the rec ord. Be cause Applicant has not shown his lawyers wer e ineffe ctive, and beca use he has not establis h ed there was a “bre akdown in the s y stem,” he has not established entitl ement 1 to relief. A ccor dingly , relief is denied. Filed: Jul y

1, 2015 Do not publish

Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 1