alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.2
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2011-C3

March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
<PAGE>

                           ARTICLES OF RESTATEMENT OF
                        THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                          QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP.

         Pursuant to ss.55-10-07 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the
undersigned corporation hereby submits these Articles of Restatement of Articles
of Incorporation for the purpose of integrating into one document its original
Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto:

        1. The name of the corporation is Quintiles Transnational Corp.

        2. The text of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of Quintiles
Transnational Corp is attached.

        3. These Restated Articles of Incorporation were adopted by the Board
of Directors and do not contain an amendment.

        4. These Articles of Restatement will become effective at 11:35AM E.D.T.
on September 25, 2003.

         This the 25th day of September, 2003.


                                     QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP.


                                     By: /s/ John S. Russell
                                         -------------------------------
                                         John S. Russell
                                         Executive Vice President


<PAGE>



                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP.

         1. The name of the corporation is Quintiles Transnational Corp.

         2. The number of shares the corporation is authorized to issue is one
hundred twenty-five million (125,000,000) shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share.

         3. The street address and county of the registered office of the
corporation in the State of North Carolina is 225 Hillsborough Street, Raleigh,
Wake County, North Carolina 27603, and the name of its registered agent at such
address is CT Corporation System.

         4. The street address and county of the principal office of the
corporation is 4709 Creekstone Drive, Suite 200, Durham, Durham County, North
Carolina 27703.

         5. To the fullest extent permitted by the North Carolina Business
Corporation Act as it exists or may hereafter be amended, no person who is
serving or who has served as a director of the corporation shall be personally
liable to the corporation or any of its shareholders for monetary damages for
breach of duty as a director. No amendment or repeal of this article, nor the
adoption of any provision to these Articles of Incorporation inconsistent with
this article, shall eliminate or reduce the protection granted herein with
respect to any matter that occurred prior to such amendment, repeal or adoption.
#### Wm. H. Young v. Chas. Bickley.

(No. 1972, Op. Book No. 2, p. 328.)

Appeal from Bexar County.

May 25, 1881.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1073. *Affidavit in lieu of appeal bond.*An affidavit 'made in lieu of an appeal bond, on appeal from justice’s to county court, which stated that the party appealing, “by reason of his poverty, is unable to give the appeal bond in this case,” was not in compliance with the law, and the judgment of the county court was reversed and the cause dismissed. [Green v. Martin, 43 Tex. 653; Ewell v. Anderson, 49 Tex. 697.]

Reversed and dismissed.
Exhibit 33.8



|     |  |                                                                  
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 130 S Jefferson Street
Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60631
(312) 233-6440
|    
|    
|    

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For
the calendar year ending December 31, 2017, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2017 and for
the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used
the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and
1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122
(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTSs
TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as
Vendor to Servicer



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 26, 2018
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Microbics, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Brehm,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)The
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)The
      information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, In all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by U.S. Microbics, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May
      21,
      2007




/S/
                Robert
                Brehm
              Robert
                Brehm
              Chief
                Executive
                Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6158

MARVIN BLUNT,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00073-JPB-DJJ)

Submitted: July 26, 2011 Decided: August 10, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Blunt, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Blunt, a District of Columbia Code offender,

seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Blunt has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
China Cable and Communication, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June
30, 2004, Yau-Sing Tang, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned
knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Date:  August 19, 2004                      /s/  Yau-Sing Tang
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Yau-Sing Tang
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
[No. 44837-4-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Raymond Wright, Jr., *Defendant,*Shawn Allen Bland, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-08557-2, Anthony E Wartnik, J., entered May 27, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 34.1





ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES








REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Members


Entergy Louisiana, LLC


Baton Rouge, Louisiana





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 27, 2015
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, J. MCFARLANE, G.G. GERDING

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

COREY J. HOLIFIELD

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201300382

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 18 July 2013.

Military Judge: LtCol Elizabeth Harvey, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Security and 

Emergency Services Battalion, Marine Corps Base, Camp 

Pendleton, Ca.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol P.A. Tafoya, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Stephen White, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

30 January 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
[No. 24271-1-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Daniel D. Reck, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 98-1-00271-7, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered January 15, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
News United States Air Force
 PACAF RQ-4 Global Hawks arrive at Yokota Air BasePublished May 28, 2023
                        
                        By Yasuo Osakabe
                        
                        
                        374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS)  --**
                **U.S. Pacific Air Forces** began positioning **RQ-4 Global Hawks** at **Yokota Air Base**, Japan, from **Andersen Air Force Base**, Guam, May 15 to provide theater-wide enduring operations in support of maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific.

The Global Hawk’s mission is to provide a broad range of U.S. intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to support joint forces, and Allies and partners in worldwide peacetime, contingency and crisis operations.

The Global Hawk serves as a high-altitude, long-endurance, remotely piloted and unarmed, aerial reconnaissance system. The aircraft provides persistent, day and night, high-resolution, all-weather imagery of large geographic areas with an array of integrated sensors and cameras.​







03:06
    
    ​The RQ-4 Global Hawk is a high-altitude, long-endurance, remotely piloted aircraft with an integrated sensor suite that provides global all-weather, day or night intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capability. Global Hawk's mission is to provide a broad spectrum of ISR collection capability to support joint combatant forces in worldwide peacetime, contingency and wartime operations. The Global Hawk provides persistent near-real-time coverage using imagery intelligence (IMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT) and moving target indicator (MTI) sensors.
 The Global Hawk also supports humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations such as during **Operation Tomodachi**, when the Defense Department mobilized 24,000 service members to assist Japan with disaster relief after a 9.0-magnitude earthquake hit the northeastern Honshu coast March 11, 2011, resulting in a tsunami that flooded the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant.

The Global Hawk has been rotationally operating from Yokota AB since 2017.RQ-4 Global Hawk 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Yokota Air Base 



Andersen Air Force Base 



joint 



disaster relief 



ISR 



Humanitarian 



DOD 



U.S. Pacific Air Forces 



PACAF 



Indo-Pacific Related Links
        RQ-4 Global Hawk
#### H. & T. C. R. R. Co. v. R. A. Watkins.

(No. 207, Op. Book No. 1, p. 651.)

Error from Navarro County.

June 15, 1878.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 345. *Liability of railroad for medical services rendered at the employment of a roadmaster.*Where the evidence showed that the roadmaster who employed the physician to attend a party employed, injured by the road, was an official whose duties were limited to a superintendence of the road-bed, track, etc., and to see that the road is kept in safe repair and condition; and where it was further shown that the superintendents and general officers of the road were alone authorized to employ physicians in such cases, *held,*that the roadmaster acted beyond the scope of his authority and agency, and therefore could not bind the road.

It is the duty of railroad companies to have some officer or agent at all times competent to exercise a discretionary authority in such cases, and on grounds of public policy they should not be suffered to do otherwise. But it is a fact, to which this court will not close its eyes, that in emergencies every person connected with the road can open communication with the superintendent and officers in less time than it has taken us to write this .sentence. Having officers charged with the duty of seeing to it that the necessary attention is rendered to the injured in case of accident, this court will not infer that any and every employee has authority to bind the company by employing physicians and surgeons whenever they please or think it proper to do so.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                           RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
                                 Columbus Center
                               One Alhambra Plaza
                                    Suite 750
                           Coral Gables, Florida 33134





                                  July 30, 2002


Mr. Marcio C. Cabrera
7240 S.W. 107 Terrace
Miami, Florida  33156

Dear Marcio:

                  Reference is made to the letter agreement between you and
Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. (then known as Ramsay Health Care, Inc) dated June
1, 1998 relating to your employment with the Company (the "Employment
Agreement").

                  This will confirm that, effective as of the close of business
on June 30, 2002, your annual base salary shall be increased to $250,000. Your
position continues to be Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, reporting to the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company. All other terms of the Employment Agreement continue in full force and
effect.

                  Please acknowledge your acceptance of and agreement with the
foregoing by signing the enclosed counterpart of this letter, whereupon this
shall constitute an amendment to the Employment Agreement.

                                          Sincerely yours,

                                          /s/ LUIS E. LAMELA
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Luis E. Lamela
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

Accepted and Agreed:



/s/ MARCIO C. CABRERA
------------------------------
         Marcio C. Cabrera
Order entered October 31, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05-22-01053-CV IN RE QUALITY CLEANING PLUS, INC., Relator Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-08606
ORDER Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Partida-Kipness, and Justice Smith Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY
GRANT relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in part and DIRECT the trial court to vacate its post-August 24, 2022 discovery orders. We DENY all other relief requested by relator in its petition. We further ORDER the trial court to file with th is Court, within ten days of the date of this order, a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order and with the Court’s opinion of th is date. Should the trial court fail to comply with this orde r, the writ will issue.We VACATE our October 7, 2022 order staying discovery.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE