alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Mission-ready Airman course graduates 11,000 strongPublished Aug. 4, 2014
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Cory Gossett
                        
                        
                        56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The 372nd Training Squadron’s Detachment 12 graduated its 11,000th mission-ready Airman, or MRA, here recently. 
With their training complete at Luke Air Force Base, the newly-graduated crew chiefs will be able to use their specialized skills at their first permanent assignment.
"Every F-16 Fighting Falcon crew chief since 1994 has completed this program prior to going to their first duty station," said Senior Master Sgt. Joseph Garcia, the 372nd TRS, Detachment 12 chief. "Luke Air Force Base is the only base that teaches this course."
The program's goal is to train the world's greatest F-16 maintainers. Small class sizes ensure each student receives proper attention and training. With the transfer of F-16s to Holloman AFB, New Mexico, the 11,000th graduate at Luke AFB is an important milestone for the program.
"This is one of the last training milestones we will have at Luke (AFB)," Garcia said. "With the program transferring to Holloman (AFB), it means the 12,000th graduate will happen there."
The MRA program is the final stage of training for F-16 crew chiefs. Their training begins at Sheppard AFB, Texas, with mostly classroom-based learning. While there, Airmen work on non-operational aircraft during "cold training." Upon arrival at Luke AFB, they transition to "hot training," getting hands-on training for an additional four weeks working with operational aircraft.
"The MRA program teaches Airmen F-16 launch, recovery, engine oil servicing, preflight and post-flight inspections," said Master Sgt. Paul Engram, a 372nd TRS training instructor. "The other phases of training at Sheppard (AFB) teach them a lot of systems knowledge and hands-on inspections, but not on operational aircraft."
With many F-16 aircraft being transferred to Holloman AFB, the final stage of MRA is scheduled to transfer in November 2015.
For previous and current MRA students, the memories and friends they've met during their time at Luke AFB will never change.
"One of the most memorable moments for the students is their first aircraft launch," Garcia said. "They are really excited to complete it, and it always leaves them smiling."
Engram said 10 percent of MRA students get stationed at Luke AFB on their first permanent assignment, but with the aircraft being transferred to New Mexico, it's likely the number will be split between the two stations.
The MRA is an important program and has been a part Luke AFB's rich history for more than 20 years. 
"When it moves to Holloman (AFB) it will continue the legacy started at Luke (AFB) of training the world's greatest F-16 maintainers," Garcia said.Luke AFB 



Holloman AFB 



student 



graduate 



training 



F-16 Fighting Falcon
#### The Texas & Pacific R. R. Co. v. E. T. Dudley.

(No. 406, Op. Book No. 2, p. 31.)

Appeal from Gregg County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 540. *Damages for destruction of crop; liability of railroad company for failing or neglecting to put up cattle-guards.*Our statute requires that “each and every railroad company whose railroad passes through a field or inclosure is hereby required to place a good and sufficient cattle-guard, or stop, at the points of entering or leaving such field or inclosure.” [Pas. Dig. art 4925.] If, from the neglect of the company to do this duty, a party’s crop is damaged or destroyed, then the railroad company owning the road is liable for all such damages done throughout the entire limits of the field or inclosure.”

§ 541. *Independent contractor, who is, and when liable, and not the railroad.*The rule for determining who are independent contractors, concisely stated, is: “When the details of the contract are to be completed under the orders of the company employing the other, and according to their direction, and the contractor undertakes, in general terms, and the company reserves the right and power not only to direct what shall be done, but how it shall be done, and to control the doing of it whilst it is being done, then the contractor is not an independent contractor, but is the agent, servant or employee of ^the party for whom he is doing the work.” [H. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Van Bayless, *ante,*p. 247.]

*272December 20, 1878.

As stated above, if the crop was destroyed because cattle-guards were not made, then the company owning the road would be liable for the damages. [H. *&*G. N. R. R. Co. v. Meador, 50 Tex. 77.] If, however, the damages were not occasioned by failure to erect cattle-guards, hut were occasioned by the wanton or intentional destruction of the crop by an independent contractor, his agents or servants, then the company employing such independent contractor would not be liable. These two aspects of the case were not properly submitted to the jury in the 'charge of the court. ■

Eeversed and remanded.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7162
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JESSE EDWARD CAUDILL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at R oanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-21, CA-97-525-R) Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse Edward Caudill, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Caudill , No. CR-93-21; CA-97-525-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1997). Our decision intimates nothing about the retroactivity of the one-year limitations period imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1997), since Appellant filed this action over one year after the effective date of the statute. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 82 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States allowing 

castration after conviction for the rape of a child under 16 years of age. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2008 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States allowing castration after conviction for the rape 

of a child under 16 years of age. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 82 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘Upon conviction for the rape of a child under the 

3 age of 16 years old, surgical or chemical castration is per4 mitted under this Constitution and does not constitute 

5 cruel and unusual punishment.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AF starts with clean sweep in sitting volleyball

              - Published  Sept. 29, 2014

**COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (AFNS) --  **Competition began Sept. 28 at the 2014 Warrior Games with four games of sitting volleyball to start the round-robin tournament at the U.S. Olympic Training Center's Sports Centers 1 and 2.Air Force made it a clean sweep of their back-to-back games. The first game against Army provided a close competition as the Air Force won 2-1 (25-22, 17-25, 15-13). In the second game, facing-off against Special Operations, Air Force made it a quick 2-0 win (25-12, 25-16).In the first round of games, Navy made it a quick match with a 2-0 win (25-13, 25-14). But in the second round, the Marines put a stop to the Navy's winning-streak with a 2-0 win (25-7, 25-20)."The Marines are always expected to take the gold in volleyball," said retired Lance Cpl. Zach Blair a native of Tipp City, Ohio. "So we came out here expecting to win. We knew the Navy was going to be a tough team, but we knew we had the tools to play the game, the players to get it done and we had the confidence to win."The sitting volleyball tournament continues each night, with the gold-medal game taking place Thursday, Oct. 2.Two-hundred wounded, ill and injured service members and veterans will compete during six days of competition in the fifth annual Warrior Games. Competitions are free and open to the public.The 2014 Warrior Games is hosted by the USOC with support from Deloitte, the presenting sponsor, and other supporting partners including the Defense Department, AT&T, BP, Dow, Semper Fi Fund, The Fisher House Foundation, The Daniels Fund and USO.Today marks the first full day of competition beginning with cycling at Fort Carson, Colorado.For more on the 2014 Warrior Games, visit teamusa.org/WarriorGames.*(Courtesy Air Force Space Command Public Affairs)*

Warrior GamesColorado SpringsColoradositting volleyball
---

EXHIBIT 99.6

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barry Fishman, Chief Executive Officer of Merus Labs
International Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                  



| | By:    | /s/ Barry Fishman      
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Barry Fishman          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | December 22, 2014      

---
EXHIBIT 11
                            GOLD CAPITAL CORPORATION
                             EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-QSB


Computation of Weighted  Average Shares  Outstanding  Used in Earnings Per Share
Calculations for the three month periods ended March 31, 1997 and 1996



                                                       Three Months
                                                      Ended March 31,
                                                   1997             1996
                                                ----------        --------


Shares issued at beginning of period            9,073,653         5,042,514

Total weighted average shares
outstanding                                     9,073,653         5,042,514
                                                =========         =========


Fully  diluted  computation  not made as  effect  would be  antidilutive  in all
periods.
Exhibit 33.8



|     |  |                         |  |                                                               
|---- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | NATIONAL TAX SEARCH
LLC |  | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601 (312)
233-6440

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period
from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the
servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.





|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer
|                                               
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo                              
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO                   
|January 18, 2016
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5461]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Florida [Mr. Goss] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. GOSS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000919601
<NAME> VENDALUX CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,308
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Wheelchair ADL Solutions Corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Matthew Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Matthew Allen Matthew Allen Chief Financial Officer  May 29, 2013     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES MELE.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.01 Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Dennis B. Gillings, Ph.D., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quintiles Transnational
Corp.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.](c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit




---



##### 



committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2005/s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. Gillings, Ph.D.Executive Chairman andChief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Superstars, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Schumacher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



BY(Signature)                       /s/Michael Schumacher
(Name and Title)                    Michael Schumacher
                                    Treasurer, Secretary and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
(Date)                              February 13, 2004