alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 19, 2007

Before

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 05-3978

KEITH MILLER,

Petitioner-Apellant,

v.

WALTER E. MARTIN,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

No. 1:04-CV-028-TS

Theresa L. Springmann, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on March 15, 2007 is hereby

amended as follows:

On Page 6, the citation to Van Patten v. Deppisch, 434 F.3d 1038, 1043 (7th

Cir. 2006), is amended to read as follows: “See Van Patten v. Deppisch, 434 F.3d

1038, 1043 (7th Cir. 2006), vacated on other grounds sub nom. Schmidt v. Van

Patten, 127 S.Ct 1120 (Jan. 16, 2007); Patrasso v. Nelson, 121 F.3d 297, 305 (7th

Cir. 1997).” 

On Page 7, the first citation to Patrasso v. Nelson is amended to read

“Patrasso, 121 F.3d at 304.”
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Trans  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Robert I.  Richards  , Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   ROBERT I. RICHARDS
-------------------------------
Robert I. Richards
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
         this  written  statement  has been  provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing  certifications are
         accompanying  the Company's Form 10-QSB solely  pursuant to section 906
         of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350,  chapter  63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 7, 2017

a0227 

# Order

Clerk March 7, 2017

153449(28)(34)

ROBERT DONALD JONES,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153449

COA: 329378

Wayne CC: 14

- 111404

- DO

NAN MILLEN JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

30, 2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear tha t the order

was entered erroneously. The motion to stay is DENIED.
(logo) **Rialto****          CAPITAL**  **2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**  Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1, 2011 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Trust Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C5 **(WFRBS 2011-C5)** The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following: 1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer. 2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision. 3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by: /s/ Adam SingerAdam Singer, Managing Director Date: March 1, 2016
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Cameron Shippit, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of RESAAS Services Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             Theissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)          [omitted];

 

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(d)          Disclosedin this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.              Theissuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b)          Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
#### R. D. Wilkins v. W. L. Weller et al.

(No. 737, Op. Book No. 2, p. 15.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 876. *Decision of judge upon facts.*The decision of the judge upon the facts of a case tried before him is *504entitled to the same presumptions in its favor as the verdict of a jury. [Gillard v. Chessney, 13 Tex. 337.]

May 6, 1880.

§ 877. *New trial; insufficiency of evidence.*The judgment of the court *a quo*refusing a new trial, applied for on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, will not be reversed unless it clearly appears that the verdict is wrong; either that it is entirely unsupported by the evidence, or that the weight of evidence so strongly preponderates against it as to make it clear that injustice has been done. [Briscoe v. Bronaugh, 1 Tex. 326, followed since by a long line of unvarying cases.]

§ 878. *Jurisdiction; amount.*Where the original debt is within the jurisdiction of the district court, but has been reduced by credit to a sum within the jurisdiction of the county court or a justice of the peace, suit may be maintained for the balance due upon the debt in the court which has jurisdiction of the amount of such balance. [Davis v. Pinckney, 20 Tex. 341.]

§ 879. *Sequestration; object and effect of the ivrit; custodia legis.*The writ of sequestration is to hold the property forthcoming to abide the decision of the court in the cause in which the writ issues. During the pendency of the suit the property is in the custody of the law. [Fowler v. Stoneum, 6 Tex. 72.]

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________ ) RON DIXON, as Conservator for ) Beatrice Jiggetts, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1789 (RWR) ) MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________)

MEMORANDUM ORDER The defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on September 21, 2009 and on September 28, 2009 moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the entire complaint, which raised claims of breach of contract, trespass and conversion. On June 29, 2010, the defendant’s motion was granted as to the plaintiff’s conversion claim, but denied as to the plaintiff’s breach of contract and trespass claims. On August 2, 2010, without seeking leave to amend, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint purporting to add a wrongful eviction claim. (Am. Compl. Docket Entry #14.) Under Rule 15(a), a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after it is served, 21 days after service of the responsive pleading if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). Fed. R. Civ.-2-

P. 15(a)(1). “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Because the plaintiff did not file timely his amended complaint or seek leave to amend or submit any written consent from the defendant, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s amended complaint [14] be, and hereby is, STRICKEN. SIGNED this 27th day of August, 2010.

/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Diversified Real Estate III, L.P. 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000773679
<NAME> DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          34,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,833)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         23,713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,881
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (158.18)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**MARIA V. GO**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 107 DB 2016 (No. 65 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 92715** 

**(Philadelphia)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8 th**  **day of September, 2016, the Report and Recommendat ion of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated August 25, 2016, is app roved and it is ORDERED**  **that Maria V. Go, who has been on Administrative Suspe nsion, has never been**  **suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications,**  **competency and learning in law required for admission t o practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
CA-EX10.1_2014.09.30-Q2


Exhibit 10.1


Appendix A
2nd Release




CA, Inc., on behalf of its officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, representatives, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, successors and assigns (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company") and "I" George Fischer agree as follows:


		
	1.
	On or about February 12, 2014, I signed a Separation Agreement and General Claims Release (“Agreement”) presented to me by the Company;


		
	2.
	Paragraph 4 of the Agreement requires me to sign a 2nd Release as a condition of receiving the Additional Payment described in Paragraph 4 of the Agreement;


		
	3.
	To date, I have received all of the benefits that have come due as outlined in Paragraph 3 of the Agreement;


		
	4.
	In consideration for the Additional Payment described in Paragraph 4 of the Agreement, I hereby waive any rights I may have to benefits under the CA, Inc. Severance Plan.  I shall not be entitled to any other severance amounts or benefits from the Company following the effective date of the 2nd Release.


		
	5.
	By signing this 2nd Release, I reaffirm each and every provision of the Agreement (which is incorporated herein by reference) as of today’s date and specifically acknowledge that I am waiving any and all claims of any nature or kind that I may have against the Company (whether known or unknown to me) that accrued or could have accrued between the time that I signed the Agreement and the time I sign this 2nd Release.




REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW





IN WITNESS WHEREFORE, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed in
its corporate name, by an individual with full authorization to act on its behalf.  Further, I
sign my name and enter this Agreement on behalf of myself, my legal representatives, executors, heirs and assigns.


EMPLOYEE


BY:     /s/ George Fischer
EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE




George Fischer                            July 1, 2014
EMPLOYEE NAME - PRINTED                     DATE




Sworn and subscribed before me this the 1 day of July, 2014.




By:  /s/ Nora L. McGarvey        [NOTARIAL SEAL]
Notary Public
_______________________________________________________________________


CA, INC.




BY:  /s/ Guy Di Lella




DATE:  7-1-2014
#### Wm. Conally *v.*B. O. Gambull.

(No. 1208, Op. Book No. 3, p. 448.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

January 29, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 90. *Appeal bond; within what timé must be filed.*When an appeal is taken to the county court from a judgment of a justice of the peace, the appeal bond must be filed within ten days after the rendition of the judgment, or the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [Mather v. Crozier, 50 Tex. 154; Lane v. Doak, 48 Tex. 228.]

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5487-H5488]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   EIGHTY-ONE PERCENT OF AMERICANS WANT DRAMATIC CUTS IN FOREIGN AID

  (Mr. BAKER of California asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
[[Page H5488]]

  Mr. BAKER of California. Mr. Speaker, while the liberal Democrats are 
attacking the Speaker of the House, we are going to go on and change 
the government because the people last November demanded change. They 
want changes in foreign aid. The liberal establishment here in 
Washington is not real fond of change. They do not approve of things 
like balanced budgets or fiscal responsibility. For years, now, 
liberals and Washington bureaucrats have made piles of money of the 
American taxpayer.
  Last November, Americans clearly rejected the status quo here in 
Washington. They rejected deficit spending, and they told Congress to 
balance their budget and end the bureaucratic spending spree.
  This week, Congress will have a chance to make some fundamental 
changes in our foreign assistance programs. We will scale back foreign 
aid and eliminate wasteful agencies. Clearly this is an opportunity to 
dramatically restructure international involvement, making it more 
accountable to the American taxpayers and more responsive to American 
interests.
  Less than 10 percent cut this year in foreign aid. That is 
disgraceful. It is not even hors d'oeuvres. Placing AID under the State 
Department is like giving your mother to the post office. This bill 
needs work. Eighty-one percent of the American people want dramatic 
cuts in foreign aid, and we have not done it. This bill is just the 
beginning. When it goes to conference, this bill needs tremendous cuts.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 AF medic earns Heroes of Military Medicine awardPublished May 5, 2014
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class David Bernal Del Agua
                        
                        
                        22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, Kan. (AFNS) --**
                A medic from McConnell Air Force Base received the 2014 Heroes of Military Medicine award, May 1, in Washington, D.C., for his work advancing and impacting military medicine.
Senior Master Sgt. David Smith, now a career advisor with the 22nd Force Support Squadron, provided medical care for more than 500 Joint Operations Task Force and Air Force Special Operations Detachment personnel without a loss of life or limb as a special operations independent duty medical technician and paramedic over the course of five years.
"It is extremely humbling looking at the past recipients and thinking that, out of the entire amazing medical mission being conducted in the Air Force, I am the one being highlighted over other people that are doing great things every day," said Smith.
He was selected to serve as the subject matter expert liaison between the Air Force Special Operations Command and Baltimore Shock Trauma Center for the Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills program at the University of Maryland in April 2005.
According to the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc. website, Smith led the largest trauma training platform in the Department of Defense, making sure more than 1,300 providers, nurses and technicians received the right training for today's military operations. 
"It's about practicing your skills when you are not performing them in a dangerous environment and continuously trying to be the best at your craft," said Smith.
His revision of the Advanced Medic Course lectures, lab procedures, and patient simulation scenarios prepared more than 300 special operations medics.
Smith thanked all the people that helped him throughout his career and also his family.
"It took a lot to sharpen me and take me to where I am today," said Smith. "I have an entire legion of people who have trained me, held me accountable, and challenged me, even when I didn't want them to at times."medic 



McConnell AFB 



Kan. 



military medicine 



heroes of military medicine
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John B. Bartling, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Tae Sik Yoon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 30, 2013

/s/ John B. Bartling, Jr. John B. Bartling, Jr. Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Tae-Sik Yoon Tae-Sik Yoon Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation and will be retained by Ares Commercial Real Estate
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---