alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Spangdahlem AB Airmen integrate in joint multinational exercise Astral KnightPublished Sept. 28, 2020
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Alison Stewart
                        
                        
                        52nd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                As part of joint multinational exercise Astral Knight, a **KC-10 Extender** refueled multiple Polish and U.S. aircraft while over Polish airspace Sept. 22 and 24.
Despite the obvious complications presented by a global pandemic, the U.S. Air Force mission never stops. Astral Knight is an integrated air and missile defense exercise focused on conducting defense of key terrain. Training involved a combination of flight operations and computer-assisted scenarios.
“We are participating in Astral Knight to extend our forces and partner forces throughout the exercise,” said Capt. Hannah Riddle, 305th Air Mobility Squadron KC-10 pilot. “It demonstrates how quickly and effectively we can respond and show that we are ready to support our allies anywhere in the world.”
Astral Knight demonstrated the capabilities of land, air, and sea interoperability between multinational forces. The exercise also tested the Patriot missile system provided by the 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command. Patriot is a highly mobile surface-to-air missile system that provides a coordinated, secure, integrated, mobile air defense system to USAFE.
“There are a number of countries that are all working together in order to make sure we understand how to command and control, which is to tell the aircraft where to go and how to orchestrate a battle,” said Col. David Epperson, 52nd Fighter Wing commander.
The aircraft utilized a KC-10 to refuel numerous times after performing sorties over Polish airspace. The KC-10 is capable of delivering more than 200,000 pounds of fuel to other aircraft, which included U.S. and Polish fighters over the duration of the exercise.
U.S. participation in multinational exercises enhances professional relationships and improves overall coordination and interoperability with allied and partner militaries.**U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa** have a strong relationship with the 10th Air and Missile Defense Command. Exercises like Astral Knight allows the Air Force to assess and improve the tactics and procedures in a realistic environment.
“Communication with Polish forces and airspace controllers has been a good experience for us,” Riddle said. “It’s important to practice with our partners to build our relationships and improve coordination.”
During Astral Knight, operating areas included the airspace in central and northeast Poland and locations in Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Spangdahlem AB 



USAFE 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe 



exercise 



Astral Knight 



f-16 



Fighting Falcon 



KC-10 



Extender 



Poland
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 5 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation and goals of ‘‘Hire 

a Veteran Week’’ and encouraging the President to issue 

a proclamation supporting those goals. 

Whereas the people of the United States have a sincere appreciation and respect for the military personnel who 

serve in the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas veterans possess special qualities and skills that 

make them ideal candidates for employment, but many 

veterans encounter difficulties in securing employment; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 5 RFS 

Whereas it would be inconsistent, inconsiderate, and contrary 

to the economic competitiveness of the United States to 

neglect the post-military needs of the military personnel 

who have served in the Armed Forces of the United 

States; 

Whereas many of the brave men and women who have served 

the United States so gallantly and selflessly in the war 

on terrorism and the war in Iraq since September 11, 

2001, are beginning to return home to be reunited with 

their loved ones and will be re-entering the workforce or 

searching for their first jobs outside of military service; 

and 

Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Labor, the Office of Personnel Management, and 

many State and local governments administer veterans 

programs and have veterans employment representatives 

both to ensure that veterans receive the services to which 

they are entitled and to promote employer interest in hiring veterans: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the importance of the men and 

4 women who have served or who currently serve in 

5 the Armed Forces of the United States; 

6 (2) supports the designation of an appropriate 

7 week as ‘‘Hire a Veteran Week’’; and 

8 (3) encourages the President to issue a procla9 mation calling upon employers, labor organizations, 

10 veterans service organizations, and Federal, State, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HCON 5 RFS 

1 and local governmental agencies (including such 

2 agencies in the several States, the District of Colum3 bia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any 

4 other territory or possession of the United States) to 

5 lend their support to increase employment of the 

6 men and women who have served in the Armed 

7 Forces of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 

2007. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Phillips & Warrick v. Thomas Adkins.

(No. 2223, R. Book No. 4, p. 260.)

Appeal from Lee County.

December 9, 1882.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 292. *Jurisdiction.*A suit was properly brought in the county in which, by its terms, the written contract was to be performed. [Rev. Stats, art. 1556, subd. 4.]

§ 293. *Costs; judgment for, in county court.*Where judgment in county court is for less than that obtained in justice’s court, it is error to give judgment for costs of the county court, unless for good cause stated upon the record. [Rev. Stats, arts. 1433, 1434.] Though.reversible error, the cause on appeal to this court will not on that ground alone be remanded, but the judgment will be reformed.

Reversed and reformed.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Retired ACC ops chief lauded by acting SecAF

              - Published  Nov. 19, 2013
              -                             By Senior Airman Jamie Jaggers                                                    
              - Air Force Public Affairs Agency, Operating Location – Pentagon

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
A retired Air Force officer who brought the F-22 Raptor fleet back to full operational status following an indefinite grounding, received the 2012 Eugene M. Zuckert Management Award, at the Pentagon, Nov. 18.

Acting Secretary of the Air Force Eric Fanning presented the award to retired Maj. Gen. Charles W. Lyon, the former Air Combat Command director of operations, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va. 

“There’s quite a list of accomplishments that made (him) a very compelling choice for this award,” Fanning said. 

As Fanning addressed the audience during a small ceremony for Lyon, he spoke to the character and accomplishments of the retired general. 

“The thing that stands out the most to me is his time in the F-22 life support system task force,” Fanning said.  “He was hand-selected by then Secretary of the Air Force Mike Donley to lead this organization. His leadership and tenacity helped return the F-22 to full operational status, and restored confidence in the safety of our fifth generation fighter fleet.” 

Lyon found the root cause of the F-22 life support anomalies, bringing the Raptor back to full flying status.  According to the award citation, he also improved the combat Air Force’s posture by successfully advocating for an additional $107 million for the 2012 flying hour program.  

“More than anything, I feel like I’m here to represent the hundreds of people who supported me while I was working the F-22 life support system task force, as well as the many other hundreds on my ACC A3 Staff,” Lyon said.

While being recognized for his managerial ability during active duty, Lyon’s focus has shifted post-retirement. 

“It was spectacular,” Lyon said. “I had a 32-year career, which had a lot of great opportunities, and I’ll bleed Air Force blue for as long as I live.  But retiring has now given me time to really be with my family, especially my wife, and our young daughter who is graduating high school this year.” 
The annual award recognizes outstanding achievements by a top-level Air Force manager – brigadier through lieutenant general or civilian equivalent. The award is named after the seventh Secretary of the Air Force Eugene M. Zuckert, who attended the award ceremonies regularly until 1998.  He passed away in 2000 at the age of 88.

F-22 RaptormanagementEugene M. Zuckert award
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cynapsus Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:



1.	the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.	the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 18, 2016 | By: | /s/ Anthony Giovinazzo                              | 
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |     | Anthony Giovinazzo                                  | 
|                      |     | President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|                      |     | (principal executive officer)                       | 
|                      |     |                                                     | 
|                      |     |                                                     | 
|Dated: March 18, 2016 | By: | /s/ Andrew
Williams                                 | 
|                      |     | Andrew Williams                                     | 
|                      |     | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer | 
|                      |     | (principal financial officer)                       | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH JAMES BILOTTI, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3134

[December 1, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-MM004121-AXXX-MB.

Claudia T. Pastorius of Claudia T. Pastorius, P.A., Melbourne, for 

appellant.

Scott B. Cosgrove, Ronald J. Tomassi and William A. O'Leary of Leon 

Cosgrove, LLP, Miami, and Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee,

Sarah Cortvriend, Chief of Litigation, Consumer Protection Division, Office 

of the Attorney General, West Palm Beach, and Victoria A. Butler, Director, 

Consumer Protection Division, Office of the Attorney General, Tampa, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EX-35.1
(logo)  Bank of America

Bank of America, N.A.
900 West Trade Street, Ste. 650
Charlotte, NC  NC1-026-06-01
www.bankofamerica.com

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

RE: Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
    Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates
    Series 2011-C3

Terms capitalized but not defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
related Primary Servicing Agreement.

In connection with the above referenced transaction, the undersigned officer,
on behalf of Bank of America, N.A., hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities undertaken during the year ending December 31, 2013, and of the
performance under the related Primary Servicing Agreement has been made
under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, Bank of America, N.A. has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
related Primary Servicing Agreement all material respects throughout such year.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, I note that Bank of America, N.A. is no longer a
servicer for the referenced transaction, having transferred the servicing rights
for such transaction to Wells Fargo Bank N.A. on August 15, 2013 (the "Transfer
Date"). The certification above is limited to the activities and performance of
Bank of America, N.A. prior to the Transfer Date.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

By: /s/ Robert H. Cox,
Robert H. Cox
Director
#### Sam Long v. R. M. Anderson.

(No. 2026, Op. Book No. 2, p. 455.)

Error from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1161. *Injunction will not be granted when party has a legal remedy.*Defendant in error in the county court enjoined a judgment which plaintiff in error had recovered against him injustice’s court, amounting to $105.55, *663and upon trial of the case the county court perpetuated' the injunction. *Held,*the defendant in error had a complete legal remedy against the judgment, if it was erroneous, by appeal or *certiorari,*and the judgment was not a void judgment. In such case it is a well established rule that as long as a party has a legal remedy by appeal or *cerliorari,*he cannot resort to equitable proceeding by injunction, and in that way secure the benefits of an appeal.

October 20, 1881.

Reversed and dismissed.

Note. — This suit was instituted in 1873, and hence the want of jurisdiction in the county judge to issue the injunction was not called in question, as it would be under our present constitution and laws.
(logo) TORCHLIGHT

LOAN SERVICES

 

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

CERTIFICATION

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2011-C5

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2011-C5 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

·         I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

·         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  

 

Date:        March 11, 2015

 

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

 

By:          /s/ Jacob Baron

Name: Jacob Baron

Title:   Authorized Signatory

 

 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T 212.883.2800   F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

   www.torchlightinvestors.com
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5085-H5086]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            SAVING MEDICARE?

  (Ms. RIVERS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. RIVERS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to point out some 
inconsistencies in many of the arguments that we are hearing today. In 
the Republican budget, the line item that guts Medicare is called 
saving Medicare.
  Make no mistake, Mr. Speaker, this is not about saving Medicare. This 
is [[Page H5086]] about saving the Republican's political behind. They 
have made promises to the most financially secure people in this 
country, and they choose to pay for them by taking from our most 
vulnerable.
  If this were about reform, we would have seen more action from the 
Republicans. Where were they in February 1994 when this issue came up? 
They did not have anything to say. Where were they when fundamental 
health care reform was being debated in this country? They were 
obstructionists. Where were they when the Danforth-Kerrey proposal came 
out? They had nothing to say. Where was this issue when they were 
writing their Contract With America? It was a nonstarter. And where 
were they in February of this year when the trustees' report came out 
again? Nowhere to be seen.
  Mr. Speaker, it is only when they have to make good on the promises 
to the wealthy that they have turned to the services to our elderly to 
get the money. Shame, shame, shame.

                          ____________________
```
#### MARY MILANO, GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CARMEN MILANO, DECEASED, AND MARY MILANO, INDIVIDUALLY v. THE HOSPITAL CENTER AT ORANGE YASHWANT BHANDARI, M.D. AND IN LEE, M.D.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
|  (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor 

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2011, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as a Pooled Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Providence Place Mall Loan Special Servicer, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series DBUBS 2011-LC3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 13 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to school prayer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2007 

Mr. MURTHA introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to school prayer. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HJ 13 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to 

3 prohibit individual prayer in public schools or to prohibit 

4 school officials from including voluntary prayer in official 

5 school ceremonies and meetings. Neither the United 

6 States nor any State shall prescribe the content of any 

7 such prayer.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### Heidenheimer Bros. v. R. A. Allen.

(No. 2436, Op. Book No. 2, p. 646.)

Appeal from Eobertson County.

June 17, 1882.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1281. *Bent; venue of suit for; storage.*“Suits for the recovery of rents may be brought in the county and precinct in which the rented premises or a part thereof are situated.” [E. S. 1556.] Appellee owned a warehouse in which appellants had stored a lot of cotton seed. • Appellee brought this suit to recover the value of the use of his warehouse for the storage of the cotton seed. The suit was brought in Eobertson county, where the warehouse was situated. Appellants resided in Galveston county, and pleaded their privilege to be sued in the county of their domicile. *Held,*the suit was in effect one to recover rent, and was properly brought in Eobertson county.

Affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MATTHEW SMITH.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.