alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Japan MoD, US DoD sign joint agreement for AI, UAS researchPublished Dec. 22, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                The U.S. Department of Defense and the Japanese Ministry of Defense signed a project arrangement for joint research on Overwhelming Response through Collaborative Autonomy, Dec. 22.

The project’s objective is to revolutionize airborne combat by merging state-of-the-art artificial intelligence and machine learning with advanced unmanned air vehicles and is a direct result of the December 2022 MoD-DoD joint statement on cooperation for Japan’s future aircraft.

The AI developed in this joint research is expected to be applied to UAVs operated alongside Japan’s next fighter aircraft.

Japan MoD and the U.S. DoD will continue to coordinate and expand bilateral cooperation on UAVs. Japan-U.S. efforts in this endeavor are beneficial for maintaining the interoperability and technological advantages of the Japan-U.S. alliance.USSF 



space force 



Japan 



MOD 



DOD 



research 



Joint Agreement 



Project 



Overwhelming Response 



AI 



Aircraft 



alliance 



LR
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 79 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box

              

 derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on June 16, 2007, or on such other 
date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee 
on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be carried out under this 
resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: Unity National Bank v. John Scroggins Appellate case number: 01

- 2 0

- 00 593

- CV

Trial court case numb er: 20 17

- 31933

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris C ounty
The Court ’ s records indicate that appellant ’ s notice of appeal , filed on August 18 , 2020 , may not have been timely filed to appeal the trial court ’ s judgment signed on May 21, 2020

. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 26.1(a)

. Any party “seek[ing] to alter the t r ial court ’ s judgment” must timely file a notice of appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1(c). Generally, if a party fails to timely file a notice of appeal, we have no jurisdiction to address the merits of the party ’ s appeal. T EX

. R

. A P P

. P. 25.1(b). On July 29, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the C o urt may dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless appell ant file d a w ritten response that demonstrate d , with citation to the record, statutes, rules, and case law, that this Court has ju risdiction ov er the appeal . On August 12, 2021, appellant responded to th e notice by letter

. S ee generally T EX

. R

. C I V

. P. 306 a( 4), (5) ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.2

. The Court requests from appellee, John Scroggins, a letter response to appellant ’ s August 12, 20 21 letter regarding jurisdiction . Appellee should include i n his response whether he is opposed or un opposed to appellant ’ s request for abatement of the appeal to allow the trial court to sign a written order specifying the date when appellant or appellan t ’ s attorney first received
n otice or acquired a ctu al knowledge of the trial court ’ s judgment

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.2(c)

. The letter response must b e filed no later than 14 days from the dat e of this order

.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Julie Countiss

_________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

___ August 19, 2021

_____
#### RONNY-GERARD, INC. v. SONNY D. CORPORATION.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### T. & P. R. R. Co. v. R. M. McMullen.

(No. 1713, Op. Book No. 3, p. 532.)

Appeal from Parker County.

April 16, 1881.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 1 60. *Time checks for labor on railroad done for a contractor; liability of railroad company for.*Suit against a railroad company upon certain time checks issued to laborers by a contractor engaged in the construction of the road, for labor performed in building the road. Held, that the checks were assignable and carried the lien with them, and that the railroad company was liable for the same.

§ 161. *Jurisdiction; liens upon real estate cannot be enforced by county or justices’ courts.*County courts and justices’ courts have no jurisdiction to adjudicate and enforce liens upon real estate. This jurisdiction is confined to district courts. [Const, art. V, secs. 8-16.]

§ 162. *Jurisdiction of justices to foreclose mortgages or liens.*Justices of the peace have power to foreclose mortgages and enforce liens on personal property when the amount in controversy is within their jurisdiction. [R. S. art. 1539.] But they have no jurisdiction in suits for the trial of title to land, or of suits for the enforcement of liens on land. [R. S. art. 1544.]

§ 163. *Jurisdiction of county or justices’ courts to foreclose lien on road-bed of railroad.*Neither the county or justices’ courts have jurisdiction to foreclose a lien upon the grade or road-bed of a railroad, the same being real estate within the meaning of the law conferring jurisdiction upon those courts.

Eeversed and reformed.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force launches new doctrine website: simplifies access, processPublished Nov. 26, 2013
                        
                        By Phil Berube
                        
                        
                        42nd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force's center for doctrine development has made it easier to access the service's fundamental documents and has the potential to cut the time it takes to publish updates to the documents from years to months or even weeks.
Officials at the Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education culminated a yearlong restructuring effort last month on how doctrine is written and presented by formally launching their new doctrine database website at https://doctrine.af.mil.
Writing for his "Chief of Staff of the Air Force Perspective" on the website, Gen. Mark A. Welsh III reminds Airmen that doctrine is not stagnant. The general encourages readers "to dive into the website to learn from the legends that came before us as well as today's Airmen. Take full advantage of this new tool as we continue to build upon our doctrinal foundation for future Airmen and provide unbeatable airpower for America."
The online database is organized into five core volumes and 29 supporting annexes with more than 900 doctrine topic modules, or DTMs, each of which focuses on a single concept within the alignment of their respective annexes. The five core volumes are basic doctrine, leadership, command, operations, and support. 
The annexes are derived from current approved Air Force doctrine documents, or AFDD, and retain the corresponding joint publication numbering convention.  Rather than revising full volumes and annexes, each DTM covers a discrete doctrine topic and can be revised when appropriate,thus allowing for more timely and focused revisions. The focus is on revising topics, not publications, officials said.
Before the restructure, doctrine was posted on the Air Force's e-Publishing website in 32 singularly focused AFDDs that amassed more than 2,600 pages. Any revisions or updates normally took years before making it to the pages on the site.
"Using a database over publications vastly improves consistency of language and content in doctrine as well as the timeliness of updates," said Maj. Gen. Walter Givhan, the LeMay Center commander. "Additionally, the database has a 'Wiki-like' feel to it, which we anticipate will increase its appeal and utility, especially among our younger Airmen." 
The new site includes a "frequently asked questions" section, the latest doctrine updates and doctrine advisories, an introduction to doctrine for newcomers, a keyword search tool, links to sister-service doctrine sites and other functions not available on the Air Force e-Publishing site.
For more on the LeMay Center, visit www.au.af.mil.Air Force Doctrine 



ePublishing 



doctrine
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6471]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Ogilvie, offered the following prayer:
  Almighty God, we praise You for Your empowering us to stand with 
strength and courage in the midst of spiritual warfare. We see the 
results of the works of evil in the violence and terrorism in both word 
and deed all around us. And inside our own hearts we often feel hassled 
by the temptations of pride, aggrandizement, and the need to control.
  We come to the armory of Your presence to be suited up with Your 
whole armor for the battles of the mind and spirit today. Thank you for 
the breastplate of righteousness that makes us secure in Your 
unqualified love and forgiveness. Shod our feet with the preparation of 
the Gospel of peace and help us to stride forward with the inner calm 
of Your perfect peace that passes understanding. Give us the shield of 
faith to quench the fiery darts of the invasion of Satanic influence. 
Place over our heads the helmet of salvation and protect our thinking 
brain from distorted half-truths and confused direction. Then help us 
to grasp the sword of the Spirit, Your words of guidance for hand-to-
hand battles with evil. On time and in time, whisper in our souls the 
exact word of encouragement and courage that we need.
  So, Lord, we gladly accept Your whole armor as we prepare for the 
battles of this day. In the name of the One who vanquished evil and is 
our victorious Lord. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1062]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         YOUTH CANCER AWARENESS

                                 ______

                           HON. CHARLIE ROSE

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 17, 1995
  Mr. ROSE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to bring to the attention of this 
body youth cancer awareness.
  More than 5 million living Americans have a history of cancer. It is 
estimated that among the 1 million people diagnosed with cancer this 
year, half will die from this disease. In my State of North Carolina 
alone, over 3,200 people will be diagnosed with cancer this year.
  Even more alarming is the growth in reported cases of cancer in young 
people. Cancer is the No. 2 killer among our youth.
  In my home State of North Carolina, the month of April is ``Cancer 
Awareness Month.'' North Carolina has planned a number of events to 
emphasize the importance of cancer awareness. I would have like to have 
made April ``National Cancer Awareness Month.'' However procedural 
changes will not permit the offering of such a resolution.
  Nonetheless, I would still like to increase the public's awareness of 
the degree to which cancer affects young people. The key to finding a 
cure for cancer is in awareness of the symptoms, the causes, and the 
best means to address the problems raised by cancer. Increased 
volunteer participation and the promotion of education and research 
have had a profound positive impact on discovering a cure. We need to 
do more in this regard.
  With the help of dedicated people like Miss Leslie Cobb, a 
Jacksonsville, NC, teen cancer activist, who fight this terrible 
disease everyday, we will eventually find a cure. I urge everyone to do 
all they can to inform our youth about the risks of cancer.

                          ____________________
```
#### H. W. Harvy & Brothers v. Bennett Radkey.

(No. 2373, Op. Book No. 4, p. 242.)

Appeal from Travis County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 276. *Contract for iron and tin work on house.*Where a contract between the parties is specific and unambiguous, it cannot be so extended by construction as to embrace matters not clearly within its provisions, or require of the parties, or either of them, any other duty than that specified in the contract.

§ 277. *Contract; how far affected by plans and specifications of an architect.*"Where the plans and specifications of an architect were expressly made parts of *113a written contract, in so far as certain matters were concerned, to hold that other matters not embraced in terms in the contract would become parts of the contract simply because they appeared in the plans and specifications, and *would have*properly come under the head of one of the items mentioned in the contract (as, for instance, where it was sought to make “cresting” come under the item of “galvanized iron work”), would be to make for the parties a contract they had not made for themselves.

June 24, 1882.

Reversed and rendered.
News United States Air Force
 US, Israel conclude Juniper Falcon 21-2Published July 29, 2021
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Michael Battles
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa Public Affairs
                **ISRAEL (AFNS) --**
                In support of long-standing, bilateral agreements, military members from the **U.S. European Command** and the **Israel Defense Forces**held exercise Juniper Falcon 21-2 at various locations in Israel, July 23-28.
A continuation of the first-ever virtual Juniper Falcon concluded Feb. 12 of this year, JF 21-2 serves as an in-person opportunity for U.S. military personnel and IDF to test emergency response procedures, ballistic missile defense and crisis response assistance in support of the defense of Israel.
“The U.S. has a long-standing and steadfast commitment to the people of Israel and their right to self-defense,” said Lt. Gen. Steven Basham, **U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa** deputy commander and Joint Task Force–Israel commander. “We consistently train together so when our personnel and equipment hit the ground, we are fully integrated and ready to face a complex range of dynamic scenarios.”
Despite the challenges presented by **COVID-19**, both the U.S. and Israel are focused on building readiness in support of the United States’ ironclad commitment to assist in the defense of Israel and are dedicated to the safety of personnel, their families and the communities where activities are taking place.
“Due to the global pandemic, we had to redesign how we come together to advance interoperability between our two forces,” Basham said. “We are using lessons learned from the last year to improve the Juniper series, while keeping health and safety a priority.”
Juniper Falcon is held every two years, alternating with Juniper Cobra, and is designed to enhance interoperability between both nations’ militaries in order to ensure U.S. and Israeli forces are ready and prepared to respond to any contingency, particularly those involving ballistic missile defense.
Juniper Falcon is driven by regional dynamics in the Middle East, but is not related to any specific events or developments. Planning for JF 21-2 began in 2020 as part of regularly scheduled training between USEUCOM and the IDF.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa 



USAFE-AFAFRICA 



U.S. European Command 



USEUCOM 



Israel 



Israel Defense Force 



IDF 



Juniper Falcon 21-2 



joint 



exercise 



partnership 



COVID-19
News United States Air Force
 Officials seeking nominations for O'Malley, visionary leadership awardsPublished Aug. 11, 2014
                        
                        By Janis El Shabazz
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Personnel Center officials said they are seeking nominations for the 2015 General and Mrs. Jerome F. O'Malley Award and the 2015 General Wilma Vaught Visionary Leadership Award.
Named in honor of the late Gen. Jerome F. O'Malley, the award recognizes the wing commander and spouse team whose contributions to the nation, the Air Force, and the local community best exemplify the highest ideas and positive leadership of a military couple in a key Air Force position.
The award is based on contributions that occur between Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2014. The military member must have served as a wing commander for at least six months during the award period and have at least two years retainability to be eligible. Each major command, combatant command, field operating agency and direct reporting unit may submit only one nomination.
Completed nomination packages are due to AFPC by Jan. 28, 2015.
Named in honor of Brig. Gen. Wilma Vaught, the award recognizes service members and civilians who have exhibited innovation, commitment and a selfless spirit of service to others while inspiring others and significantly improving the integration of and opportunities for women in the Air Force.
Officers, enlisted members and civilians from any career field or occupational series are eligible.
The award is based on contributions that occur between Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2014. Completed nomination packages are due to AFPC by Oct. 17, 2014.
Organizations and base-level personnel must contact their MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA or DRU for applicable suspense dates and additional information regarding nomination procedures.
For more information on Air Force recognition programs and other personnel issues, visit the myPers website.O'Malley Award 



nomination 



award 



leadership 



wing commander 



integration 



General Wilma Vaught Visionary Leadership Award
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 63 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Received 

FEBRUARY 17, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving of the decision of the President announced 

on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That— 

3 (1) Congress and the American people will con4 tinue to support and protect the members of the 

5 United States Armed Forces who are serving or who 

6 have served bravely and honorably in Iraq; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

HCON 63 RFS 

1 (2) Congress disapproves of the decision of 

2 President George W. Bush announced on January 

3 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional 

4 United States combat troops to Iraq. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Tele-Communications,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jeffrey M. Nigl, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Jeffrey M. Nigl
---------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Nigl
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM E. FORD.

February 6, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.