alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force looks to cost-effective technologies to sustain future operations

              - Published  March 27, 2014
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Torri Ingalsbe                                                    
              - Air Force Public Affairs Agency Operating Location-P

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
Focused and balanced investments in science and technology programs across the services were at the center of discussions during a hearing before the House Armed Services Committee’s subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threat and Capabilities on Capitol Hill, March 26.

Dr. David Walker, Air Force deputy assistant secretary of science, technology and engineering, stressed the importance of maintaining technological superiority, while also ensuring the proper management of funding for new and more cost-effective programs.

“Globalization and the proliferation of technology mean we face threats across a wide spectrum and competition across all domains,” he said. “The focused and balanced investments of the Air Force Fiscal Year 2015 [Science and Technology] program are hedges against the unpredictable future and provide pathways to a flexible, precise and lethal force at a relatively low cost in relation to the return on investment.”

Technological advancement and sustainment efforts were highlighted by Alan Shaffer, assistant secretary of defense principle deputy for defense research and engineering. He noted some of the ways the DOD is creating technology surprise through innovative technologies and engineering.

“The department invests in a structured way to create surprise,” Shaffer said. “Creation of surprise requires a robust basic research program coupled with a strong applied research. While it is not really possible to know where technology surprise will come from, there are several areas that highlight the possibility.”

Walker emphasized the need for learning from the past, as well as focusing on the future, while addressing the highest priority needs of the Air Force across the near-, mid- and far-term. By building and growing game-changing and enabling technologies, he is confident the Air Force’s science and technology (S&T) strategy is poised to ensure technological superiority across air, space and cyberspace.

“This flexible strategy provides us the technological agility to adapt our S&T (space and technology) program to dynamic strategic, budgetary and technology environments, and will shape prioritized actionable S&T plans,” he said.

Regardless of budget constraints, the commitment to supporting the warfighter and protecting this nation from any threat are top priorities, Walker said.

“We recognize that fiscal challenges will not disappear tomorrow, and that is why we have continued to improve our processes to make better investment decisions and efficiently deliver capability to our warfighters.”

technologycost-effectiveinvestmentsfundingscience
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Reardon to perform duties of under secretary of the Air Force

              - Published  Feb. 9, 2021
              -                             By   Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs                                                    

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
**Anthony Reardon**, administrative assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force, is performing the duties of the under secretary of the Air Force as of Feb. 2.**Acting Secretary of the Air Force John Roth** officially designated Reardon as the first assistant to the under secretary of the Air Force. In this capacity, he may perform the duties of the role in accordance with the Federal Vacancies Reform Act and **Department of Defense Directive 3020.04**.Reardon served in the active duty Air Force from 1982 – 2003. He started his civil service career after retiring. A member of the Senior Executive Service, he serves as the senior career civilian advisor to the secretary of the Air Force performing high-level assignments following the secretary’s policies, goals and objectives.The office of the under secretary of the Air Force is responsible for the affairs of the Department of the Air Force, to include organizing, training, equipping and providing for the welfare of approximately 697,000 active duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian Airmen and Guardians and their families worldwide.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceUnder SecretarySenior LeadersFederal Vacancies Reform ActDoD Directive3020.04
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  VERITEC INC.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned, Van Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Veritec Inc. (the "Company"), individually, has executed this
Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      The undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of
the 19th day of February, 2004.

                                        /s/ Van Tran
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Van Tran
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                       17
#### J. C. Heaton & Bro. v. Morgan’s La. *&*Tex. R. R. & S. S. Co.

(No. 926, Op. Book No. 2, p. 317.)

Appeal from Victoria County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 774. *Common carriers; extent of liability of; cannot limit their common law liability; negligence cannot be excused l>y contract.*In Arnold v. Jones, 26 Tex. 335, it is said that “the old rule that the common carrier is answerable for all losses which are not occasioned by the act of Cod or public enemies is founded alike in justice and sound policy, and ought never to be departed from.” And where their avocation is plied within the limits of our own state, the statute expressly prohibits their right to restrict or limit their liability as it exists at common law, by any special agreement whatever. [R. S. 278.]-In other states, where a different rule obtains, the privilege of limiting their liability by special contract ought not, and does not, extend so far as to include liability for losses attributable to the negligence of the carrier or his servants; and it makes no difference whether the negligence is slight or gross, or whether the terms of the contract include negligence or do not. A contract that one shall not be liable for his own negligence is against public policy. [U. S. Dig. vol. VI (N. S.), pp. 147, 148, § 52; 2 Pars, on Con. (5th ed.) pp. 233, 234.) Tho attempted limitation of liability in this instance was a stipulation attached to the bill of lading in tire following words, viz.:

“All liability for damages by rust or breakage, unless caused by bad stowage, is assumed by shippers.” The damage complained of by plaintiffs was bjr breakage. It was impossible for plaintiffs to prove how the damage was done. They could and did prove that the goods were put up in good order for shipment, and should have come safely. The breakage might have been occasioned by bad stowage, and yet how were they to prove it? It might *426have been occasioned by the most reckless carelessness, wilfulness, wantonness or negligence of the carriers or their servants or employees, in any other manner than by bad stowage, and they were to be exempted from liability for all such acts. The law cannot tolerate such contracts. They are contrary to public policy, and should be held to be absolutely void.

January 29, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Peter Gabel v. B. R. McMahan.

(No. 578, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 453.)

Appeal from Harris County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§716. *Dormant judgment; execution issued upon.*By failure to issue execution within one year from the date of the rendition of the judgment, the judgment became dormant. The act of November 9, 1866, is not in conflict *392with, nor does it abrogate, this rule. The third section of that act, which provides that “no judgment of a court of record shall become dormant, unless ten years shall have elapsed between the issuance of executions,” was only intended to apply to cases where execution had issued in the first instance within twelve months. [Sampson v. *Wyeth,*49 Tex. 627; Boggess v. Howard, 40 Tex. 153; Black v. Epperson, 40 Tex. 163; Ayres v. Waul, 44 Tex 549.]

March 5, 1879.

§717. *Injunction the proper remedy against a dormant judgment.*Injunction is the proper remedy, and will be granted to restrain the enforcement of an execution on a dormant judgment. [North v. Swing, 24 Tex. 193; Jordan v. Corley, 42 Tex. 284.]

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Unmanned QF-4 crashes near HollomanPublished Feb. 10, 2014
                **HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                An unmanned QF-4 Aerial Target assigned to the 82nd Aerial Target Squadron here, crashed Feb. 7. The crash site is located inside the White Sands National Monument, which was closed in advance of the test mission.
The cause of the crash is unknown at this time, and the incident is under investigation.
"We are working closely with the National Park Service to minimize the amount of time the monument will be closed, and we apologize for any inconvenience this might cause."
This crash follows a QF-4 crash in July 2011 where a manned version of the aircraft crashed near Hope, N.M. In that incident, the pilot safely ejected and was unharmed. The last two unmanned crashes occurred at Holloman AFB in August 2006 and September 2004.
The aircraft was assigned to Det. 1, 82nd ATS, which is a tenant unit at Holloman assigned to the 53rd Weapons Evaluation Group.
The QF-4 is a remotely controlled target drone, which realistically simulates enemy aircraft maneuvers and can be flown by remote control or with a safety pilot in the cockpit. As a safety precaution, a chase plane trails the drone during critical periods of flight.
The supersonic QF-4 is a reusable full-scale, remotely piloted aerial target modified from the F-4 Phantom. The QF-4 provides a realistic full-scale target for air-to-air weapons system evaluation, development and testing. Holloman AFB is one of two bases to operate the QF-4, with the other being Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. The QF-4 is being replaced by the QF-16, a supersonic reusable full-scale aerial target modified from an F-16 Fighting Falcon.*(Courtesy of 49th Wing Public Affairs)*QF-4 



Holloman AFB Related Links
        QF-4 Aerial Target
                                Oct. 16, 2008
                                The supersonic QF-4 is a reusable full-scale, remotely piloted aerial target modified from the F-4 Phantom. The QF-4 provides a realistic full-scale target for air-to-air weapons system evaluation, development and testing at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., and Holloman AFB, N.M.
            
            Holloman Air Force Base
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 351 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 351

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2013

   Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Coats, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
Risch, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Rubio, Mr. 
Barrasso, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Portman, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Flake, 
    Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Thune, Mr. Graham, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
Boozman, Mr. Burr, Ms. Collins, Mr. Paul, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. 
Toomey, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Blunt, Mrs. Fischer, Ms. Ayotte, and Mr. Enzi) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Seniors' Access to 
Medicare Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 3403 and 10320 of 
such Act (including the amendments made by such sections) are repealed, 
and any provision of law amended by such sections is hereby restored as 
if such sections had not been enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                           RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
                         ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, MAY 12, 2000 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) today announced results for the first quarter ended March 31,
2000. The Company reported that net revenues for the quarter reached $23,457,000
and net income totaled $160,000 or $.02 per share.

Commenting on first quarter performance, Luis E. Lamela, President and CEO of
Ramsay Youth Services, Inc., noted, "Our results for the first quarter reflect
our steady growth in the youth services business. We are very pleased with the
Company's performance and look forward to continue providing quality education
and treatment programs to youth."

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading quality provider and manager of
treatment, education and community-based programs for at-risk, troubled and
special needs youth. The Company has operations in nine states and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information.

                                  Table Follows
                                       ###



Contact:   Isa Diaz
           Vice President Corporate Relations
           (305) 569-4626
News United States Air Force
 Happy Holidays from Air Force senior leaders and spousesPublished Dec. 20, 2017
                        
                        
                        Air Force Public Affairs Agency
                
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)** – Secretary of the Air Force Heather A. Wilson and her husband, along with Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright and their spouses, wish all Airmen and families season’s greetings.Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Secretary of the Air Force 



SecAF 



Heather Wilson 



Chief of Staff of the Air Force David Goldfein 



chief of staff of the Air Force 



CSAF 



David Goldfein 



Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Kaleth Wright 



Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force 



CMSAF 



Kaleth Wright 



season greetings 



holidays 



Airmen 



Air Force 



AF 



spouses 



families
#### H. & T. C. R’y Co. v. W. J. Wheeler.

(No. 1496, Op. Book No. 3, p. 510.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

March 19, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 170. *Continuance; diligence.*On a first application for a continuance upon the ground of the absence of material witnesses, it was not necessary to show that the witnesses’ fees have been paid or tendered to them. [Tex. Transp. Co. v. Hyatt & Henning, 54 Tex. 213.]

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Exeo Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended November
30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Amaral,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
    of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Robert
    S. Amaral                                                                               | Dated: | March
    16, 2020
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------ | ------------------
|       | Robert
    S. Amaral                                                                                   |        |                   
|Title: | Chief
                                         Financial Officer
        (Principal
Financial Officer)



This
certification is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A
signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 421 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 421

To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from taking any action to establish 
 a restricted area prohibiting public access to waters downstream of a 
                      dam, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2013

 Mr. Alexander (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Corker, and Mr. Paul) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from taking any action to establish 
 a restricted area prohibiting public access to waters downstream of a 
                      dam, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom to Fish Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTED AREAS AT CORPS OF ENGINEERS DAMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall not 
take any action to establish a restricted area prohibiting public 
access to waters downstream of a dam owned by the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Exclusion.--For purposes of this Act, installing and 
maintaining sirens, strobe lights, and signage for alerting the public 
of hazardous water conditions shall not be considered to be an action 
to establish a restricted area under subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), this section 
        shall apply to an action described in subsection (a) on or 
        after August 1, 2012.
            (2) Existing restrictions.--If the Secretary of the Army, 
        acting through the Chief of Engineers, has taken an action 
        described in subsection (a) during the period beginning on 
        August 1, 2012, and ending on the date of enactment of this 
        Act, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) cease implementing the restricted area 
                resulting from the action; and
                    (B) remove any barriers constructed in connection 
                with the restricted area.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHNNY A. FOSTER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1501

[ August 26, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561993CF002780A

.

Johnny A. Foster, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

M AY

, F ORST and K U NTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.