alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

d0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138852 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138852 

 COA: 289768 

Genesee CC: 06-019287-FH 

RODNEY WAYNE PHILLIPS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                          16,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,402,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                   184,532
<INVENTORY>                                 11,792,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,754,417
<PP&E>                                      26,721,888
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,147,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,330,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,457,034
<BONDS>                                     24,667,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,648
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,295,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,330,830
<SALES>                                     23,332,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,332,014
<CGS>                                       18,650,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,912,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                62,502
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             504,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,943,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                   621,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,322,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,322,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2


 


Labor Contract






This labor contract is based on the People’s Republic China’s labor law and labor contract law and other related laws
and regulations.






Employer:_______China Ginseng
Holdings,Inc_____


 


Employer’s address:
RM1601 Zhongji Building 1562 Jiefang Great Road, Changchun City, Jilin, China 


 


Legal Representative: Liu,Changzhen


 


Employee:___ Liu,Changzhen
___


 


Gender: Male


 


Employee’s ID Number:
220502195508150039


 


Employee’s address:
23-6,Hongqi ST,Chaoyang district Changchun city


 


I. Contract Period & Probation Period


 


Both parties agreed to choose
__1__ for the employment terms


		1.	Fixed contract period:From January 2, 2014 to January 1,2017.



		2.	No fixed contract period: From__________year_______month_______day



		3.	By Project : From _______________to completion






 


II Job Description & Job
Location


 


CEO 


 


III Working Hours & Time
Off


 


Both parties agreed to choose
_1_as working hours


		1.	Standard full time



		2.	Non Standard hours



		3.	Combined hours



 






    	 



    	 



    

 


IV Remuneration



By consensus, both parties confirm the wage is __¥8,000.00__
a month. Payment should be in monetary form and full payment of the monthly wages shall be delivered by the _the last_ day
of the month. Employer shall not unjustifiably deduct or delay in paying the wages. The monthly wage shall not less than the minimum
wage implemented by the city. 



V Social Insurance and Labor benefits




In accordance with central government, state, provincial and municipal policies and regulations




VI Labor conditions and labor protection against occupational hazards 



In accordance with central government, state and provincial requirements relating to the
implementation of occupational safety and health 



VII Termination & Renew of the Labor Contract


 


Both parties observe the central government, state and provincial regulations regarding
the termination of the labor contract. Unless the violation is expressly stipulated by state, either party in violation of the
contract will be subject to the payment of appropriate compensation for breach of contract.



This contract is effective from the date signed by both parties,


 


Employer: __ China Ginseng
Holdings,Inc __


 


Legal Representative: Liu, Changzhen Date;___01-02-2014__


 


Employee: __ Liu, Changzhen __ Date:__ 01-02-2014__


 


Governing Authority: Changchun City Employment Service (with seal)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6126]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           EXECUTIVE SESSION

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, in executive session, I ask unanimous 
consent that the Senate immediately proceed to the consideration of 
Executive Calendar No. 106, Charles T. Manatt, to be a member of the 
Board of Directors for the Communications Satellite Corporation; 
further, that the nomination be confirmed, and the motion to reconsider 
be laid upon the table; that any statements relating to the nomination 
appear at the appropriate place in the Record; and that the President 
be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The nomination was considered and confirmed as follows:
                  Communications Satellite Corporation

       Charles T. Manatt, of the District of Columbia, to be a 
     Member of the Board of Directors of the Communications 
     Satellite Corporation until the date of the annual meeting of 
     the Corporation in 1997.
     

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7727

DOUGLAS L. JONES, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

MARK TIMOTHY WILLIAMS; HALIFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; BLUE 

RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; PROBATION AND PAROLE DISTRICT 

O8, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (7:08-cv-00436-JCT-MFU) 

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Douglas L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Douglas L. Jones appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Jones v. Williams, No. 7:08-cv-00436-

jct-mfu (W.D. Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5085]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                     May 17, 1995.
       I hereby designate the Honorable Fred Upton to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                    Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# SUMMARY:

On September 7, 2010 (75 FR 54299), the Commission on Civil Rights announced September 21, 2010 as the meeting date for a planning and briefing meeting of the New Hampshire State Advisory Committee.

The date and starting times for these meetings are changed to Monday, September 20, 2010. The meetings will convene at 9 a.m. at the Manchester City Library, 405 Pine Street, Manchester, NH 03104.

The meetings are open to the public.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 2010-23121 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3020 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3020

  To establish the composition known as America the Beautiful as the 
                            national anthem.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2014

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish the composition known as America the Beautiful as the 
                            national anthem.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL ANTHEM.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) America the Beautiful is an anthem that far better 
        represents the scope and majesty of the geography of the United 
        States of America as well as the principles of freedom, 
        liberty, fraternity, and progress that are the unifying beliefs 
        of our democracy.
            (2) America the Beautiful enshrines the sacrifice of those 
        who have given their lives to create and preserve our 
        democracy.
            (3) America the Beautiful should replace the Star-Spangled 
        Banner as the national anthem.
    (b) Amendment.--Section 301(a) of title 36, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Designation.--The composition consisting of the words and 
music known as America the Beautiful is the national anthem.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. DOMENICI. For the information of all Senators, the Senate will 
resume consideration of the budget resolution on 8:30 Monday morning. 
By a previous order, there will be a rollcall vote on the Lautenberg-
Rockefeller Medicare amendment at 3:15 p.m. on Monday. Senators can 
expect further rollcall votes during Monday's session of the Senate, 
and the majority leader has indicated he would anticipate a late 
session on Monday in order to make progress on the budget resolution.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32
                                  VERITEC, INC.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned, Van Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Veritec,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  individually,  has  executed  this
Certification  in connection  with the filing with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  of the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB  for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").

       The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial 2 condition  and  results of  operations  of the
        Company as of September 30, 2004 (the last day of the  period covered by
        this Report).

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Certification as of
the 12th day of November, 2004.

                                         /s/    Van Tran
                                         -------------------------
                                         Van Tran
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer


























                                Exhibit 32 - 1
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4673]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

ANNOUNCEMENT BY CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON RULES ON AMENDMENT PROCESS 
                       FOR THE BUDGET RESOLUTION

  (Mr. SOLOMON asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, the Rules Committee is planning to meet on 
next Tuesday, May 16, to grant a rule which may limit the kind of 
amendments offered to the concurrent resolution on the budget for 
fiscal year 1996.
  Members are strongly advised to submit only amendments in the nature 
of a substitute which provide for a balanced budget not later than the 
year 2002.
  Any Member who is contemplating an amendment to the budget resolution 
should submit 55 copies and a brief explanation by 5 p.m. on Monday, 
May 15, to the Rules Committee, room H-312 in the Capitol.
  Members should use the Office of Legislative Counsel and the 
Congressional Budget Office to ensure that their amendments are 
properly drafted and should check with the Office of the 
Parliamentarian to be certain their amendments comply with the rules of 
the House.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 18149-9-III.

Division Three.

April 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gracie Hinojosa, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 98-1-00592-4, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered November 23, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Kato, JJ.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 60 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the United States has, in the course of its history, 

fought in many wars and conflicts to defend freedom and 

protect the interests of the Nation; 

Whereas millions of men and women have served the Nation 

in time of need as members of the Armed Forces; 
2 

•HCON 60 EH 

Whereas the service of veterans has been vital to the Nation, 

and the sacrifices made by veterans and their families 

should not be forgotten with the passage of time; 

Whereas children throughout the Nation would benefit from 

programs that provide education about veterans and that 

instill a patriotic appreciation of the sacrifices made by 

veterans to defend freedom and to protect the interests 

of the Nation; 

Whereas efforts are being made throughout the Nation to devote November 10, or another date as may be designated, 

to an event known as Veterans Educate Today’s Students 

Day; and 

Whereas schools that participate in Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day set aside a portion of the school day 

for the study, recognition, and appreciation of veterans: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the importance of veterans to the 

4 United States; 

5 (2) expresses support for the goals of Veterans 

6 Educate Today’s Students Day; 

7 (3) urges teachers, civic leaders, and veterans 

8 to carry out programs that educate children about 

9 the service of veterans and the sacrifices made by 

10 veterans and their families; and 

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to participate in local and national activities recog-
3 

•HCON 60 EH 

1 nizing Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day and 

2 other events that foster education about the impor3 tance of veterans to the Nation. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 60 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Veterans Eduother purposes. cate Today’s Students (VETS) Day, and for
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Steven C. McNeal, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.








Date:  March 28, 2019





By: /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy Louisiana, LLC as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
#### Austin City Water Company v. Capital Ice Company.

(No. 1218, Op. Book No. 2, p. 403.)

Appeal from Travis County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1132. *Evidence; entries in parties’books of payments made.*The entries made by a party in his books of payments made cannot be better testimony to prove such payments than the sworn testimony of those who made or received the payments. [Townsend v. Coleman, 20 Tex. 821; 1 Greenl. Ev. 117; Whart. Ev. 77.]

§ 1133. *Charge of court; need not state issues made by pleadings; refusal of charge asked not ground for reversal, when, etc.*It is not essential that the judge in charging the jury should state to them what are the *642issues made by the pleadings; of that, the pleadings, •which are read to them, informs them. And where the jury were sufficiently instructed by the court to enable them to understand the subjects in controversy, it was not error to refuse a requested instruction, even had it been correct, when from the facts of the case it was not perceived how injury could have resulted to the party asking such instruction by its refusal. [Floyd v. Rice, 28 Tex. 341; Vaughan v. Warnell, 28 Tex. 119; Fort v. Barnett, 23 Tex. 460; Oliver v. Chapman, 15 Tex. 406.)

March 16, 1881.

§ 1134. *Damages on breach of contract; measure of, and rules relating to.*Where there is nothing in the-contract limiting the liability of the defendant, he is liable to actual damages for a breach of the same, whether the breach was occasioned by his negligence or was without any negligence on his part. [Sedgwick on Dam. 33.] The general rule for the assessment of damages in cases of breach of contract is that a party may recover such damages as'are incidental to and caused by the breach of the contract, and may reasonably be supposed to have entered into the contemplation of the parties at the time of making the contract. [Calvit v. McFaddin, 13 Tex. 327.] Damage done machinery is properly estimated by what it actually and reasonably cost to repair it.

Affirmed.