alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ANNICE PRYOR,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 18-920 (JDB)(GMH)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 

Defendant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of [13] the thorough Report and Recommendation from Magistrate 

Judge G. Michael Harvey dated September 18, 2018, the absence of any objections thereto, and 

the entire record herein, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated September 18, 2018, is adopted

in full; it is further

ORDERED that [9] plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED IN PART and 

DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff be awarded a total of $60,005.73 in fees and costs; and it is 

further

ORDERED that judgment be entered accordingly.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

 JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Dated: October 3, 2018
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Corp, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 14, 2012



|                           
|---------------------------
|/S/ John G. Corp           
|John G. Corp               
|Principal Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1070 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1070

 To allow postal patrons to contribute to funding for gang prevention 
  programs through the voluntary purchase of certain specially issued 
                            postage stamps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2007

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow postal patrons to contribute to funding for gang prevention 
  programs through the voluntary purchase of certain specially issued 
                            postage stamps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stamp Out Gang Violence Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL POSTAGE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to afford a convenient way for members of 
the public to contribute to funding for gang prevention programs, the 
United States Postal Service shall provide for a special postage stamp 
in accordance with subsection (b).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the stamp 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be governed by section 416 of title 
39, United States Code, and regulations under such section, subject to 
the following:
            (1) Disposition of proceeds.--All amounts becoming 
        available from the sale of such stamp shall be transferred to 
        the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) 
        Program, administered by the Office of Justice Programs of the 
        Department of Justice, through payments which shall be made at 
        least twice a year.
            (2) Duration.--Such stamp shall be made available to the 
        public for a period of at least 2 years, beginning no later 
        than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (3) Limitation.--Such stamp shall not be counted for 
        purposes of applying any numerical limitation under subsection 
        (e)(1)(C) of such section.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 33.7**

[SunTrust Logo] 

MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE 

WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA 

March 14, 2014 

SunTrustBank (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”), for securitization transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after December 31, 2005 (the “Platform”). The Asserting Party is not assessing compliance with any othercriteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR. 

The Asserting Party used the applicable criteria in paragraph (d) ofTitle 17, Section 229.1122 of the CFR to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

The Asserting Party has concludedthat it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”). 

Ernst & Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment ofcompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion. 

SUNTRUST BANK 

Solely with respect to Sections 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) 

By: /s/ Terri Stoots 

Terri Stoots 

Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE TRANS ENERGY, INC. FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND
               IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        89,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     89,896
<PP&E>                                            6,293,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,806,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,058,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8,083,482
<BONDS>                                             541,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             23,986
<OTHER-SE>                                       16,857,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,058,555
<SALES>                                              89,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     89,896
<CGS>                                               104,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       720,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  134,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (664,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (664,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (664,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.08)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20822 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JUAN GABRIEL ORTUNO

- OLEA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 168

- 1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Gabriel Ortuno

- Olea appeals his conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. Ortuno

Olea asserts that the indictment was invalid because the removal order was void due to a defectiv e notice to appear that failed to specify the date and time for his removal hearing. He concedes that the issue is foreclosed by United

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 29, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20822 Document: 00515469407 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2020No. 19

- 20822

2 States v. Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied , 2020 WL 2515686 (2020) and Pierre

- Paul v. Barr , 930 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied , 2020 WL 1978950 (U.S. Apr. 27, 2020) (No. 19

- 779) , but he wishes to preserve it for further review. The Government has filed a motion for summary affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed under Pedroza

- Rocha and Pierre

- Paul . Alternatively, the Government requests an extension of time to file a brief. In Pedroza

- Rocha , we concluded that the notice to appear was not rendered deficient because it did not specify a date or time for the removal hearing, that any such alleged deficiency had not deprived the immigration court of jurisdiction, and that the defendant could not collaterally attack his underlying removal order without first exhausting his administrative remedies. Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F.3d at 496

- 98. Because the Government’s position “is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED , the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED , and the judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 19-20822 Document: 00515469407 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/29/2020
News United States Air Force
 SNCO Academy’s enhanced curriculum development takes center stage during CSAF inaugural visitPublished March 16, 2022
                        
                        By Senior Airman Rhonda Smith, Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                **Air Force Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy** students recently took the opportunity to share their enhanced curriculum development with Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. CQ Brown, Jr**., during a visit at **Maxwell Air Force Base**’s Gunter Annex.

The enhanced curriculum focuses on integrated deterrence and aims to take a more strategic approach to developing senior NCOs by aligning it with foundational competencies. The academy is currently in a 90-day sprint to assess its current program.

“We are taking a national security-first approach during this sprint to identify the educational and developmental gaps that our senior enlisted leaders and staff need to maintain the competitive advantage,” said **Chief Master Sgt. Dan Hoglund**, AFSNCOA commandant. “Ensuring our Airmen are operationally trained and developed is integral to remaining a lethal and ready force.”

The new curriculum will focus on topics like geopolitics, military operations, airpower, leadership, and innovation, with an emphasis on the national security strategy for an overall warfighter and military focused program.

In his inaugural visit to the SNCOA, Brown took the opportunity to speak on priorities and roles he envisions of senior enlisted leaders.

“It is really about team building,” Brown said. “It's the aspect of looking at the challenges, and then having a sense of urgency and seeing how we can break those barriers to move things forward.”FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air University 



AU 



SNCOA 



AFSNCOA 



Air Force Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy 



Air Force Senior NCO Academy 



Barnes Center for Enlisted Education 



Barnes Center 



CSAF 



Gen. CQ Brown Jr. 



Geopolitics 



military operations 



airpower 



education 



readiness 



leadership 



innovation 



warfighter 



National Security Strategy Related Links
        Chiefs Orientation focused on Readiness, People and Culture
            
            Air University overhauls curriculum to focus on competition
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**39 CA 15-01137**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JGB PROPERTIES, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

IRONWOOD, L.L.C., STEELWAY REALTY CORPORATION, TOWN OF CLAY, 4550 STEELWAY BOULEVARD, LLC, PLAINVILLE FARMS, LLC, JSF SERVICES, LLC, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

CAMARDO LAW FIRM, P.C., AUBURN (SALVATORE D. FERLAZZO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS IRONWOOD, L.L.C., STEELWAY REALTY CORPORATION, 4550 STEELWAY BOULEVARD, LLC, PLAINVILLE FARMS, LLC, AND JSF SERVICES, LLC.
NIXON PEABODY LLP, ROCHESTER (TERENCE L. ROBINSON, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
ROBERT M. GERMAIN, TOWN ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS. (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF CLAY.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered September 8, 2014. The order, among other things, dismissed the first amended complaint against defendants Ironwood, L.L.C., Steelway Realty Corporation, Town of Clay, 4550 Steelway Boulevard, LLC, Plainville Farms, LLC, JSF Services, LLC, and CSX Transportation, Inc.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6764]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT--WHITEWATER RESOLUTION

  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that at 10:30 a.m. 
on Wednesday, May 17, the Senate turn to the consideration of a 
resolution to be offered by Senator D'Amato establishing a special 
committee to conduct an investigation involving the 
Whitewater, and it be considered under the following time 
agreement: 2 hours, to be equally divided between the chairman and the 
ranking minority member of the Banking Committee; that no amendments or 
motions be in order; and that, following the conclusion or yielding 
back of time, the Senate proceed to vote on the resolution without any 
intervening action or debate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year for 2015 announcedPublished July 27, 2015
                        
                        By Janis El Shabazz
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected the service's top enlisted members, naming the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year for 2015.
An Air Force selection board at the Air Force Personnel Center considered 35 nominees who represented major commands, direct reporting units, field operating agencies and Headquarters Air Force. The board selected 12 Airmen based on superior leadership, job performance and personal achievements.**12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year, by command of assignment when selected:**
Tech. Sgt. Tamara R. Acfalle, Air Force Space Command
Master Sgt. Joseph Y. Bogdan, Air Mobility Command
Senior Airman Allen R. Cherry, III, U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa
Senior Airman Kresston L. Davis, Air Force Reserve Command
Staff Sgt. Lindsey H. Fuentes, Air Combat Command
Staff Sgt. Kurtis V. Harrison, Air Force Materiel Command
Senior Airman Meaghan G. Holley, Air Force District of Washington
Staff Sgt. Travis R. Jordan, Air Force Special Operations Command
Staff Sgt. Douglas P. Kechijian, Air National Guard
Master Sgt. Timothy A. Mason, Air Education and Training Command
Senior Airman Mason S. Meherg, Air Force Global Strike Command
Senior Master Sgt. Harold J. Terrance Jr., Pacific Air Forces
The winners are authorized to wear the Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon with the bronze service star device on the ribbon. They are also authorized to wear the Outstanding Airman of the Year Badge for one year from the date of formal presentation.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.awards 



Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph 



Outstanding Airmen of the Year
[No. 44575-8-I.

Division One.

April 24, 2000.]

#### Donald A. Foltz, et al., *Appellants,*v. Crum and Forster Personal Insurance, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 97-2-00143-7, Linda C. Krese, J., entered May 11 and June 11, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Baker and Appelwick, JJ.
News United States Air Force
 National Science Foundation ranks Academy's research program No. 1Published March 25, 2015
                        
                        By U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                The U.S. Air Force Academy was named the No. 1 funded undergraduate research program of U.S. colleges and universities, according to a recent survey by the National Science Foundation.
This is the eighth consecutive year the foundation has recognized the Academy.
The Academy moved up in the overall list of university expenditure rankings. The latest figures show the institution ranks 188th out of 645 schools -- undergraduate and graduate programs -- and above the U.S. Military and U.S. Naval academies, which ranked 313th and 316th, respectively.
The Academy ranked just below the Naval Post Graduate School, and higher than the Air Force Institute of Technology, the graduate studies program for the Air Force.
The ranking is slightly higher than in 2012, when the Academy ranked 194th, indicating that in financially constrained times, research funding for the Academy remains steady.
"The research programs at the Academy are producing results for the warfighter and our Defense Department customers," said Dr. Jim Solti, the Academy's chief scientist. "While funding levels are lower than five years ago, funding has been steady for the past two years."USAFA 



U.S. Air Force Academy 



college 



university 



National Science Foundation 



research
<PAGE>   1

                       MICRON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES           EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
                          Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
<CAPTION>


                                                (UNAUDITED)                (UNAUDITED)
                                           For the three months         For the six months
                                            ended December 31,          ended December 31,
                                            1995          1996          1995          1996
                                            -----        -----         ------        ------
                                                 (in thousands except per share data)

<S>                                         <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>   
Net Income ...............................  $ 580        $ 993         $1,066        $1,975

(a) Computation of Primary Earnings
     per Share:

Weighted average common
equivalent shares outstanding
  Common stock ...........................  3,903        4,033          3,903         4,033
  Common stock equivalents:
    Warrants(1) ..........................     44           54             48            49
    Options (2) ..........................     14          125             24            85
                                            -----        -----         ------        ------
Weighted average common and
common equivalent shares
outstanding ..............................  3,961        4,212          3,975         4,167
                                            =====        =====         ======        ======

 Primary Earnings per Share ..............  $0.15        $0.24         $ 0.27        $ 0.47
                                            =====        =====         ======        ======

(b) Computation of Fully Diluted
     Earnings per Share:

Weighted average common
equivalent shares outstanding
  Common stock ...........................  3,903        4,033          3,903         4,033
  Common stock equivalents:
    Warrants(1) ..........................     45           69             49            69
    Options (2) ..........................     24          245             40           245
                                            -----        -----         ------        ------
Weighted average common and
common equivalent shares
outstanding ..............................  3,972        4,347          3,992         4,347
                                            =====        =====         ======        ======

 Fully Diluted Earnings per Share ........  $0.15        $0.23         $ 0.27        $ 0.45
                                            =====        =====         ======        ======


----------
<FN>

(1)  Warrants issued 5/94 for 100,000 shares, less shares reacquired under the
     treasury stock method.

(2)  Options granted 12/94, 5/95, 12/95, 1/96, 7/96 and 11/96 under option plan,
     less shares reacquired under the treasury stock method.

</TABLE>










                                       15