alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 49

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
 Medicaid Services within the Department of Health and Human Services 
relating a cost limit for providers operated by units of government and 
              other provisions under the Medicaid Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2007

    Mr. Waxman introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
 Medicaid Services within the Department of Health and Human Services 
relating a cost limit for providers operated by units of government and 
              other provisions under the Medicaid Program.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services within 
the Department of Health and Human Services relating to a cost limit 
for providers operated by units of government and other provisions 
under the Medicaid program (published at 72 Fed. Reg. 29748 (May 29, 
2007)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1053 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to carry out certain transportation projects in the State of California to relieve congestion on State 

Route 91. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2007 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, 

and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to carry out 

certain transportation projects in the State of California 

to relieve congestion on State Route 91. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘California State Route 

5 91 Congestion Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation 

8 is authorized to carry out the following projects: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1053 IH

1 (1) A project to add one general purpose lane 

2 in each direction from State Route 55 to the River3 side County line. 

4 (2) A project to add an auxiliary lane along 

5 State Route 91 in each direction from State Route 

6 241 to State Route 71. 

7 (3) A project to add truck storage lanes in both 

8 directions at the existing commercial vehicle enforce9 ment facility on State Route 91. 

10 (4) A project to divert traffic from the State 

11 Route 241 Toll Road via a direct connector to the 

12 State Route 91 Express Lanes (HOT) to improve 

13 the traffic operation of the interchange and alleviate 

14 traffic between Orange and Riverside Counties. 

15 (5) A project to add freeway-to-freeway connec16 tors between State Route 56 and Interstate Route 5. 

17 (b) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—The Secretary 

18 shall carry out the projects authorized by subsection (a) 

19 in accordance with the requirements of title 23, United 

20 States Code. 

21 (c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

22 of a project carried out under subsection (a) shall be 80 

23 percent. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1053 IH

1 (d) DELEGATION.—The Secretary may delegate to 

2 the State of California responsibility for carrying out a 

3 project with funds made available to carry out this section. 

4 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro6 priated from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the 

7 Mass Transit Account)— 

8 (1) $221,325,000 to carry out section 2(a)(1); 

9 (2) $40,700,000 to carry out section 2(a)(2); 

10 (3) $7,080,000 to carry out section 2(a)(3); 

11 (4) $56,000,000 to carry out section 2(a)(4); 

12 and 

13 (5) $65,000,000 to carry out section 2(a)(5). 

14 (b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds authorized by 

15 subsection (a) shall remain available until expended. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0325. STARSHIP ENTERPRISES OF ATLANTA, INC. v. GWINNETT

COUNTY, GEORGIA.

Starship Enterprises of Atlanta, Inc. (“Starship”), filed a complaint for an

injunction and declaratory judgment against Gwinnett County (“the County”) in the

superior court, seeking to prevent the enforcement of certain zoning ordinances. The

County then filed a counterclaim for a permanent injunction as well as a motion for

summary judgment on its counterclaim, and Starship voluntarily dismissed its

complaint. The superior court granted the County’s motion and its counterclaim, and

Starship filed this application for discretionary appeal.

1

The superior court’s order is, however, directly appealable. Under OCGA §

5-6-35 (a) (1), a discretionary application is required to appeal “decisions of the

superior courts reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies,”

but this provision applies only when the superior court order to be appealed actually

reviews an agency decision, which is not the case here. See King v. City of

Bainbridge, 272 Ga. 427 (1) (531 SE2d 350) (2000).

Ordinarily, we will grant a timely application for discretionary appeal when the

lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Starship, 

1 We previously transferred the application to the Supreme Court on the basis

that jurisdiction may be proper there, but the Supreme Court returned it here. See

Case No. S18D0879 (returned Apr. 4, 2018).

May 16, 2018
however, has already filed a notice of appeal from the superior court’s order. See

Case No. A18A1492. Accordingly, this application issuperfluous, and it istherefore

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/16/2018
News United States Air Force
 DAF establishes central fund for disability reasonable accommodationsPublished Dec. 15, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                The Department of the Air Force has implemented a central fund for reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities. This approach will provide DAF senior leaders with greater insights about the types of reasonable accommodations requested and funded throughout the DAF.
"This central fund will help the Department of the Air Force retain and develop current civilian employees with a disability, recruit new talent, and remove barriers to advancement," said Under Secretary of the Air Force **Gina Ortiz Jones**.
Beginning Dec. 15th, approved reasonable accommodation requests will be reimbursed using this fund. Organizations should coordinate with their local Disability Program Manager, follow local procurement procedures to fulfill approved requests, and utilize Emergency Special Program code “7F” to identify all approved reasonable accommodations costs for reimbursement.
Providing reasonable accommodations is a legal requirement under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The DAF is developing a disabilities reasonable accommodations portal to centralize and streamline requests for reasonable accommodations. The goals of the portal are to facilitate and simplify the reasonable accommodation request process, allow the tracking of requests, and streamline the reimbursement process. The service intends to roll out the portal in early 2023.
Jones has also directed the realignment of the Disability Program Manager position to the Office of Diversity and Inclusion to administratively align duties and ensure accessibility is factored into diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts across the DAF. The program manager will help develop policies, strategies, and goals for supporting people with disabilities.
A reasonable accommodation is a modification or an adjustment to a job or the work environment that will enable a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to perform essential job functions.
A listing of Disability Program Managers at each installation is listed **here**. Any questions about funding for reasonable accommodations should be directed to these installation DPMs.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Rehabilitation Act of 1973 



central fund 



Disabilities 



Reasonable accommodations 



USecAF 



Gina Ortiz Jones 



7F 



One Team One Fight 



inclusion
News United States Air Force
 AFCENT Deputy Commander, allies, partners attend 4th Manama Air Power SymposiumPublished Nov. 9, 2022
                        
                        By Ninth Air Force (Air Forces Central)
                **MANAMA, Bahrain (AFNS) --**
                **Maj. Gen. David Harris**, deputy commander, Ninth Air Force (Air Forces Central), and Deputy, Combined Forces Air Component Commander, **U.S. Central Command****,**was a guest speaker at the 4th Manama Air Power Symposium, Bahrain, Nov. 8.
During his briefing entitled “Collaborative Combat Aircraft in Modern Air Power,” Harris addressed the ever-evolving technology environment, the use of unmanned aerial systems, and the importance of joint training and integration with partners to achieve maximum effectiveness in the air domain.
“By training together and establishing common data-sharing practices, we can flatten communication, capitalize on the strengths of every country and improve the effectiveness of our coalition,” Harris said. “While technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and distributed edge computing are rapidly maturing and will be essential elements of autonomous UAS, the need for joint and coalition training will be foundational to advance our collective strength."
The symposium was the anchoring event for the Bahrain International Air Show, taking place Nov. 9-11 at Sakhir Air Base, and provided a platform for 300 defense officials and industry partners to stay at the cutting edge of developments.
Participants included **Vice Adm. Brad Cooper**, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, and international air force leaders from Bahrain, Brazil, India, Lebanon, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom.
This was the first iteration of the Manama Air Power Symposium held in person in more than two years.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFCENT 



U.S. Air Forces Central 



U.S. Central Command 



centcom 



Manama Air Power Symposium 



ninth air force 



Brazil 



India 



lebanon 



Pakistan 



United Kingdom
News United States Air Force
 Air Force auxiliary to continue missions during government shutdownPublished Oct. 1, 2013
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                Members of the Civil Air Patrol, the U.S. Air Force auxiliary, will continue to perform emergency and disaster response missions authorized by Air Force officials during the federal government shutdown, officials announced Oct. 1.
CAP members annually participate in 90 percent of America’s inland search and rescue missions and during the past year conducted more than 50 disaster relief operations, including damage assessment flights during recent Colorado flooding, the Oklahoma tornadoes and Hurricane Sandy. In addition, CAP saved 32 lives in 2012, while conducting 700 search and rescue missions, nine of which were attributed to the expertise of CAP’s cell phone forensics and radar experts.
“The Air Force depends on Civil Air Patrol to perform these critical missions,” said CAP Maj. Gen. Chuck Carr, the CAP national commander. “During emergencies, CAP provides (the Federal Emergency Management Agency) and state and local governments with digital photos of the damage and where help is urgently needed in real time, ensuring a rapid response.
“Our search and rescue services also rely on high-tech tools and technology to produce exceptional, life-saving results,” he said.
CAP is a nonprofit organization with nearly 61,000 members nationwide, operating a fleet of 550 aircraft. Its members play a leading role in aerospace education and serve as mentors to more than 26,000 young people currently participating in the CAP cadet programs. CAP received the World Peace Prize in 2011 and has been performing missions for America for 72 years.
(Courtesy of Civil Air Patrol Public Affairs)CAP 



government shutdown 



shutdown 



search and rescue 



safety 



emergency response 



Civil Air Patrol
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation
(the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and
"Sponsor") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of October 21, 2011 among the
Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2011-3 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2013, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 31stday of May, 2013.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1598

NORMAN ABBOTT; DINAH ABBOTT, Petitioners - Appellants,

v. SUN TRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00665-REP)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Abbott and Dinah Abbott, Appellants Pro Se. Curtis Gilbert Manchester, Travis Aaron Sabalewski, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Norman and Dinah Abbott appeal the district court’s order sanctioning them $1,000 and enjoining them from filing any action involving the subject matter of the instant action, and enjoining them from further unrelated filings without payment of

the sanction and leave of court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. Sun Trust Mortgage

Inc. , No. 3:08-cv-00665-REP (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 8, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 8, 2018

157921(46)

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 157921

v COA: 336795

Oakland CC: 2016-153573-CZ

BISHOP FOLEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL,

REVEREND GERARD J. LEBOEUF, JOANNE

MOLNAR, NANCY HAGER, ARCHDIOCESE

OF DETROIT, HIS EMINENCE ADAM JOSEPH

MAIDA, SISTER MARY GEHRINGER, and

ROES 1 – 50,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

RICHARD FISCHER,

Defendant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees to file a surreply 

is GRANTED. The surreply submitted on August 1, 2018, is accepted for filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         101,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,045,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,234,312
<INVENTORY>                                 14,595,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,397,750
<PP&E>                                      29,041,556
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,631,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,321,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       50,963,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           369
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,799,833)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,321,424
<SALES>                                     34,453,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,453,916
<CGS>                                       27,813,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,461,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,238,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             667,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,562,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,587,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,587,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          79,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  480,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,510
<INVENTORY>                                    290,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               925,949
<PP&E>                                       1,387,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                 987,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,508,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,202,998
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,768
<COMMON>                                        13,985
<OTHER-SE>                                   (227,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,508,589
<SALES>                                      1,090,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,090,490
<CGS>                                        1,085,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,545,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (483,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (483,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (510,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee.
    Date: October 7-8, 2010.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: DoubleTree Bethesda Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Jeannette L. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes on Aging, National Institutes of 
Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-402-7705, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a1015121409151410433a14131b54141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1bbbeb9bfa2bebfbbe891bfb8b0ffbfb8b9ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 9, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-23069 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>