alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic
Tele-Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey M. Nigl, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Jeffrey M. Nigl
-------------------
Jeffrey M. Nigl
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 99.10



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                      RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC. ANNOUNCES
                       FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR END RESULTS

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, MARCH 13, 2000 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) today announced results for the fourth quarter and year ended
December 31, 1999. Total revenues for the fourth quarter were $22,244,000 and
net income totaled $659,000 or $0.07 per share.

For the year, the Company reported total revenues of $81,474,000 and net income
of $3,117,000 or $0.33 per share on a fully diluted basis. These results include
the impact of two non-recurring settlements in favor of the Company which
increased the year end results by $1,500,000 or $0.16 per share. Excluding the
positive impact of the settlements, net income for the year ended December 31,
1999 would have been $1,617,000 or $0.17 per share on a fully diluted basis.

Commenting on the results, Luis E. Lamela, President and CEO of Ramsay Youth
Services, Inc. said, "We are very pleased with our results, they reflect the
Company's continued success in filling bed capacity and expanding the business
through organic growth. As we look toward the future, we anticipate penetrating
new markets, developing new products and increasing capacity in existing
markets. In order to support these business objectives, the Company is currently
working with SunTrust Equitable Securities in raising additional capital."

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading quality provider and manager of
education, treatment and juvenile justice programs for at-risk youth. The
Company serves youth in 9 states and Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information.


                                  Table Follows
                                       ###



Contact:   Isa Diaz
           Vice President Corporate Relations
           (305) 569-4626
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: T-7A Red Hawks Start Testing, Diversity and Inclusion Conference, Hypersonic Weapons FamiliarizationPublished Oct. 13, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, a new training aircraft is being put through its paces, the Department of the Air Force focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility at a special conference, and crews from Air Force Global Strike Command and Air Combat Command come together to learn about hypersonic weapons. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



T-7A Red Hawks 



Diversity and Inclusion 



hypersonic weapons Related Links
        Air Force accepts first T-7 Red Hawk, more testing
            
            DAF's 2023 DEIA Conference champions respect, recruitment, retention and readiness
            
            Edwards AFB Hosts Hypersonic Weapon Familiarization Training
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1086-120, 12th Floor 550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among GS Mortgage
Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, and Citibank, N.A., as Certificate
Administrator, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-GC5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement
during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout
the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13thday of March 2013.



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel E. Bober                                                    
|Executive Vice President
Commercial Mortgage Servicing Wells Fargo
Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
News United States Air Force
 Hurricane Hunters fly into Tropical Storm BerthaPublished Aug. 4, 2014
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Ryan Labadens
                        
                        
                        403rd Wing Public Affairs
                **KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE, Miss. (AFNS) --**
                Aircrew members from the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron Hurricane Hunters have been flying data-gathering missions into Tropical Storm Bertha out of the Henry E. Rohlsen Airport in St. Croix, part of the U.S. Virgin Islands.
According to Lt. Col. Jon Talbot, the 53rd WRS chief meteorologist, the Hurricane Hunters flew their first low-level investigation into the storm July 31, to see if the winds on the surface of the Atlantic Ocean were starting to rotate in a circular pattern, which would indicate the storm was becoming more organized. Once they determine that, the Hurricane Hunters use further flights in the squadron's WC-130J aircraft to locate the low-pressure center of the storm.
"Our job is to provide the operational, day-to-day data collection for the National Hurricane Center," Talbot said. "So it's real-time important information that the hurricane forecaster uses almost like now-casting for projecting future events of a storm."
The Hurricane Hunters attempt to fly two six-hour storm fixes to determine the center of the storm. During the flights, the aircrews constantly transmit the information they gather via satellite to the National Hurricane Center, which uses the information to generate projected storm paths. As of Aug. 2, Bertha was approximately 100 miles southwest of St. Croix, with sustained winds of 45 mph.
According to the National Hurricane Center website (www.nhc.noaa.gov), Bertha is projected to curve north and head back out into the Atlantic Ocean during the middle of the week.
"It's very important information that we're trying to collect for the forecast, so we're proud to do it," Talbot said.hurricane hunters 



storms 



emergency assistance 



pilots 



53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron 



weather
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7113]

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Working Group on Procurement will next meet November 1-5, 2010 in Vienna. At that meeting, the Working Group will continue its work on revisions to the 1994 Model Law on Procurement of Goods, Construction and Services, and it may also begin a review of a Guide to Enactment that will accompany the revised Model Law.

In preparation for that meeting, a public meeting will be held, under the auspices of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private International Law, to obtain the views of concerned stakeholders.

*Time and Place:*                     The public meeting will take place at The George Washington University Law School, Faculty Conference Center, 5th floor, 2000 H Street, NW., Washington, DC on October 21, 2010. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and is expected to last no later than noon. If you are unable to attend the public meeting and would like to participate from a remote location, teleconferencing will be available.                

*Public Participation:*                     It is requested that persons wishing to attend contact Trisha Smeltzer prior to October 14, 2010, at                     *smeltzertk@state.gov*                     or 703-812-2382 and provide their name, e-mail address, and affiliation. A member of the public requesting reasonable accommodation should make his or her request upon registering for the meeting. Such requests received after October 19 will be considered, but might not be possible to fulfill. Please contact Ms. Smeltzer for additional meeting information, including teleconferencing dial-in details.                

Dated: September 7, 2010.

Keith Loken,

Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-22890 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 11 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to voluntary school prayer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2007 

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to voluntary school prayer. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is hereby proposed as an amendment to the 

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to 

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if rati7 fied by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the sev8 eral States within seven years from the date of its proposal 

9 to the States by the Congress: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 11 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to 

3 prohibit individual or group prayer in public schools or 

4 other public institutions. No person shall be required by 

5 the United States or by any State to participate in prayer. 

6 Neither the United States nor any State shall prescribe 

7 the content of any such prayer.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10 (b)
RULE 30a-2(b)
CERTIFICATION



In
connection with this report on Form N-CSR for the registrant as furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



	 	(1) 	the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as  applicable; and







	 	(2)	the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.







	By:     	 /s/
BRIAN T. ZINO
Brian
T. Zino
Chief Executive Officer
 

	Date:	December 2, 2003
 

	By:     	 /s/
/s/ LAWRENCE P. VOGEL
Lawrence
P. Vogel
Chief Financial Officer
 

	Date:	December 2, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4790]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. Bryant] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee addressed the House. His remarks will appear 
hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
*The Honorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999.

He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3434

___________

CMS Communications, Inc., *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Siemens Rolm Communications, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 22, 1999

Filed: May 24, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN,* Chief Judge, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

CMS Communications, Inc. (CMS) appeals the district court's adverse grant of

summary judgment in CMS's diversity-based action for tortious interference with

business relations and defamation. We review a grant of summary judgment under a

well-established standard. Because this is a diversity action, we review de novo

questions of state law. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are

satisfied the district court correctly applied the controlling law and the record supports
-2-

the district court's decisionmaking. Because a comprehensive opinion in this diversity

case would lack precedential value, we affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling

without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5088]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       VOTE TO BALANCE THE BUDGET

  (Mr. CHRISTENSEN asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. CHRISTENSEN. Mr. Speaker, let me remind my friend on the left 
that just spoke that punishment is saddling the future generation with 
the debt, if we fail to act, if we fail to pass a budget that balances 
over the next 5 to 7 years.
  Punishment is failing to do something in the next few days that will 
get this country in the right direction fiscally. If we fail to act, 
the children of this country face $187,000 in interest alone if they 
were born tomorrow. A child born tomorrow would pay $187,000 in 
interest alone on this Nation's debt.
  Tomorrow we have the opportunity to vote on a budget that will 
balance over the next 5 to 7 years. Tomorrow we have an opportunity to 
send this country in the right direction, to take it out of its 
financial abyss where the left-leaning liberals have taken it over the 
last 40 years.
  Tomorrow we have an opportunity to take this country in the right 
direction. I ask my colleagues to consider very strongly where they 
want this country to go, a budget that is balanced or where it has been 
over the last 40 years.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4904

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL ALEXANDER MCLEAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-00-47-BO)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 27, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes,

Assistant United States Attorney, Mary Jude Darrow, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Following his conviction and sentence for unlawful possession

of a weapon by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g) (West 2000),

Rafael A. McLean appeals from the district court’s order denying

his motion to suppress evidence of his possession of a firearm. He

contends that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop

him, and therefore the discovery of the gun was in violation of the

Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the

parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. See United States v.

Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 9 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order denying McLean’s motion to suppress. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41118 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO ORTIZ-CERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-42-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Antonio OrtizCervantes raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### J. R. Floyd v. H. F. Brawner.

(No. 1113, Op. Book No. 3, p. 486.)

Error from Clay County.

February 9, 1881.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 135. *Parol evidence; not admissible to*contradict, etc., *written. instrument.*The general rule is elementary, that parol contemporaneous evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary the terms of a valid written instrument. [2 Phil. Ev. 350; 2 Stark. Ev. 514; 1 Greenl. Ev. § 275; Whart. Ev. § 1014.] Where a written document is resorted to by the parties for the expression of their conclusions, after a series of conferences, such document will be regarded as expressing their final views, and as absorbing all other parol understandings, prior or contemporaneous. Thus, in this case, the note sued upon was not due at the time of the institution of the suit, as clearly appeared upon its face. In the court below the plaintiff was permitted to prove by parol that it was the understanding of the parties, at the time of the execution of the note, that, upon the happening of a certain event, the note wTas to become due, and that said event had transpired before the institution of the suit. It was held error to admit this evidence.

Reversed and remanded.