alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the quarterly report of Engineered
Support Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Gary C. Gerhardt, Vice Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)      The Report complies with Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2004
      -------------

By: /s/ Gary C. Gerhardt
   ------------------------
    Gary C. Gerhardt
    Vice Chairman and Chief
    Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and will be retained by
Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2958 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the employer wage 

credit for employees who are active duty members of the Uniformed Services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the employer wage credit for employees who are active 

duty members of the Uniformed Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guard and Military 

5 Reservist Pay Security Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2958 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EMPLOYER WAGE CREDIT FOR EM2 PLOYEES WHO ARE ACTIVE DUTY MEMBERS 

3 OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES. 

4 (a) PERMANENT EXTENSION.—Section 45P of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 subsection (f). 

7 (b) EXPANSION OF CREDIT.— 

8 (1) EXPANSION TO 100 PERCENT OF ELIGIBLE

9 DIFFERENTIAL WAGE PAYMENTS.—Subsection (a) of 

10 section 45P of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

11 is amended by striking ‘‘20 percent of’’. 

12 (2) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Subsection 

13 (b) of section 45P of such Code is amended by add14 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(4) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—In the 

16 case of any taxable year beginning after 2015, the 

17 $20,000 amount in paragraph (1) shall be increased 

18 by an amount equal to— 

19 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

20 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter21 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

22 year in which the taxable year begins, by sub23 stituting ‘calendar year 2014’ for ‘calendar year 

24 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 2958 IS

1 If the amount as increased under the preceding sen2 tence is not a multiple of $100, such amount shall 

3 be rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.’’. 

4 (3) APPLICABILITY TO ALL EMPLOYERS.— 

5 (A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of sec6 tion 45P of such Code, as amended by para7 graph (1), is amended by striking ‘‘eligible 

8 small business employer’’ and inserting ‘‘eligible 

9 employer’’. 

10 (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Para11 graph (3) of section 45P(b) of such Code is 

12 amended— 

13 (i) in subparagraph (A)— 

14 (I) by striking ‘‘eligible small 

15 business employer’’ and inserting ‘‘eli16 gible employer’’, and 

17 (II) by striking ‘‘any employer 

18 which’’ and all that follows and insert19 ing ‘‘any employer which, under a 

20 written plan of the employer, provides 

21 eligible differential wage payments to 

22 every qualified employee of the em23 ployer.’’, and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

4 

•S 2958 IS

1 (ii) by striking ‘‘ELIGIBLE SMALL

2 BUSINESS EMPLOYER’’ in the heading and 

3 inserting ‘‘ELIGIBLE EMPLOYER’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to payments made after December 

6 31, 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Grant & Berry v. Williams & Tolliver.

(No. 2625, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Ellis County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 363. *Trial of the right of property where partner's interest in partnership property is levied 'upon.*The interest of an individual partner in partnership property *154is subject to the levy of and sale under an execution issued on a judgment against him individually.

June 2, 1883.

§ 364. *On trial of right to partnership property, how far can rights of partners and equities of other parties he investigated?*On a trial of the right to property in possession of, and claimed by, a partnership firm, neither the Vights of the partners nor the equities between the partners themselves, nor between the firm and its creditors, can or will be adjudicated. [3 Kent’s Comm. pp. 77, 78; Rogers v. Nichols, 20 Tex. 725; Thompson v. Tinnin, 25 Tex. Sup. 56; De Forrest, Armstrong & Co. v. Miller, 42 Tex. 34; Elliott v. Booth, 44 Tex. 181.]

Affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VITO POLITI.

March 6, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
exhibit101_102414






 Exhibit 10.1


CLECO CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN
(As amended and restated)


AMENDMENT NO. 1


Whereas, Cleco Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana (the “Company”), maintains the Executive Severance Plan, which plan is intended to be a welfare benefit plan within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (the “Plan”);
Whereas, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors now desires to amend the Plan for the purpose of facilitating the payment of severance thereunder, and Section 7.3 of the Plan permits such amendment;
Now, Therefore, subject to any notice requirement under the Plan, Section 2.11 of the Plan shall be amended and restated as follows:
“2.11    “Good Reason” means that: (a) a Covered Executive’s Base Compensation in effect immediately before the commencement of a Change in Control Period is materially reduced, or there is a material reduction or termination of such executive’s rights to any employee benefit in effect immediately prior to such period; (b) a Covered Executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities are materially reduced from  those in effect immediately before the commencement of a Change in Control Period (it being understood that in no event shall a Covered Executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities be deemed to be reduced as a consequence of or related to the Company ceasing to be a publicly listed company); (c) a Covered Executive is required to be away from his or her office in the course of discharging his or her duties and responsibilities significantly more than was required before the commencement of a Change in Control Period; or (d) a Covered Executive is required to transfer to an office or business location that is more than 60 miles from the primary location to which he or she was assigned prior to the commencement of a Change in Control Period. No event or condition shall constitute Good Reason hereunder unless: (i) a Covered Executive provides to the Committee written notice of his or her objection to such event not later than 60 days after such executive first learns, or should have learned, of such event; (ii) such event is not corrected by the Company promptly after receipt of such notice, but in no event more than 30 days after receipt thereof; and (iii) such executive Separates From Service not more than 15 days following the expiration of the 30-day period described in clause (ii) hereof.  One or more members of the Committee, as constituted immediately prior to the commencement of a Change in Control Period, shall determine whether any Separation From Service is on account of Good Reason as defined herein.
This Amendment No. 1 has been duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Cleco Corporation, to be effective 30 days following any notice requirement under the Plan.


	
	
	Cleco Corporation

	 

	By:  /s/  Judy P. Miller                  

	 

	Date:  October 21, 2014
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EG10-40-000, EG10-41-000, et al.]
 Docket No.Taloga Wind, LLC
EG10-40-000Stephentown Regulation Services LLC
EG10-41-000Longview Power, LLC
EG10-42-000Alta Wind I, LLC
EG10-43-000Alta Wind II, LLC
EG10-44-000Alta Wind III, LLC
EG10-45-000Alta Wind IV, LLC
EG10-46-000Alta Wind V, LLC
EG10-47-000Synergics Roth Rock Wind Energy, LLC
EG10-49-000Synergics Roth Rock North Wind Energy, LLC
EG10-50-000
 Take notice that during the month of August 2010, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 366.7(a). Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2010-23213 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Morris Air National Guard Base to receive FMS F-16s to train Slovak Air ForcePublished Nov. 15, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected **Morris Air National Guard Base**, Arizona, as the location to receive up to nine Slovak-owned F-16s to be temporarily stationed in the United States beginning in the spring of 2024 through fiscal year 2026 at the 162nd Wing.
The addition of Slovak-owned F-16s at Morris ANGB will require an increase of almost 30 ANG personnel, and only four of the possible nine aircraft will be used for flying training of Slovak Air Force pilots.
This action will not replace ongoing initial qualification pilot training provided to the Slovak Air Force using the 162nd Wing but will augment and accelerate the development of the Slovak pilot cadre.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Slovakia 



Slovak air force 



One Team One Fight 



Morris ANGB 



Arizona 



FMS F-16 



162nd Wing 



Aircraft 



airpower
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22995]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the South Dakota Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the South Dakota Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 1 p.m. and end at 3 p.m. on Tuesday, September 28, 
2010. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee to discuss recent 
Commission and regional activities and current civil rights issues in 
the State and plan future activities.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-516-9896, access code: 8334. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges made over wireless lines, 
and the Commission will not refund those charges incurred. Callers will 
incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
access code number.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting the 
Rocky Mountain Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before 
the scheduled meeting date.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 28, 2010. 
The address is Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 999-18th Street, Suite 
1380 South, Denver, CO 80202; (303) 866-1040. Comments may be e-mailed 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4421262b2c2b360431372727366a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167374797e796456636575756438717960">[email protected]</span></a>. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain 
Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on September 10, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-22995 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4966]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1200
     TOP 10 TACTICS OF THE NEW MINORITY IN THE POSTCONTRACT PERIOD

  (Mr. HAYWORTH asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. HAYWORTH. Mr. Speaker, from the home office in Scottsdale, AZ--
here are the top 10 tactics of the new minority in the postcontract 
period.
  No. 10. Change the name of ``Medicare'' to ``Mediscare'';
  No. 9. Hire Freddy Krueger as the new liberal Democrat spokesman;
  No. 8. Get Leon Panetta to take likeability lessons;
  No. 7. Set up a new political action committee--the ``Whine 
producers''--w-h-i-n-e;
  No. 6. Insist that it is relevant to carp, complain, and sit on the 
sidelines instead of offering policy alternatives;
  No. 5. Put an ostrich ranch here on the Hill to mimic the practice of 
putting heads in the sand to hide from problems;
  No. 4. Insist that a bigger Federal Government is the only way to 
meet any challenge;
  No. 3. Get the Department of Education to change the name of 
``addition'' to ``subtraction'';
  No. 2. Revise history to say the credibility gap was a good thing;
  And the No. 1 postcontract tactic of the new minority--grouse, 
grouch, grumble, and mumble--do anything but cooperate.

                          ____________________
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14
- 6242

LORENZA PORTER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. ERIC WILSON, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv
- 00737

- HEH )

Submitted : March 12, 2019 Decided: March 18, 2019

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lorenza Porter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lorenza Porter appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C

. § 2241 (2012) petition. Since filing his petition, Porter has been released from custody , and his supervised release was terminated. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973) ( “[T]he essence of habe as corpus is an attack by a person in custody upon the legality of that custody, and . . . the traditional function of the writ is to secure release from illegal custody.” ) ; Carafas v. LaVallee , 391 U.S. 234, 238 (1968) (recognizing that purpose of habeas corpus “is to provide an effective and speedy instrument by which judicial inquiry may be had into the legality of the detention of a person”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material s before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### ELIZABETH FITZMAURICE v. CLINTON F. MAIN, CHANEL, INC., AND THE HERTZ CORPORATION.

February 16, 1984.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to the end that it shall, in turn, temporarily remand the matter to the trial court to obtain a statement of reasons from the trial judge to support the action she had taken with regard to the jury’s verdict; and it is further

ORDERED that the Appellate Division is to retain jurisdiction in order to reconsider its judgment in the light of the trial court’s response.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Body Composition, Civilian Development, F-35 UpgradesPublished Jan. 20, 2023
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                This week’s look around the Air Force highlights the new Body Composition Program standards that begin in April, Department of the Air Force civilians can self-nominate for developmental opportunities, and upgrades for the F-35 are undergoing tests before implementation. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Department of the Air Force outlines new Body Composition Program for Airmen, Guardians****- Civilian Development nomination window opens Jan. 11****- F-35 conducts first flight with TR-3**Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



Body Composition Program 



health 



Civilian Development Program 



professional military education 



F-35 Lightning II 



Technology Refresh 3
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the *“Company* ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”* ),
      I,
      Patrick White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      May
      15, 2006








/s/Patrick
      White


Patrick
      White


Chief
      Executive Officer








37
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases latest field grade officer promotionsPublished Oct. 4, 2023
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force selected 292 active-duty officers for promotion to colonel, lieutenant colonel and major during recent CY23A, CY23C and CY23D central selection boards.
In total, the Air Force selected 114 lieutenant colonels for promotion to colonel (LAF-J, BSC, DC, MC, and NC), 47 majors to lieutenant colonel (LAF-J and Chaplain) and 131 captains for promotion to major (BSC).
Colonel (M0623A) selection statistics:

Dental Corps (DC) - 15 selected out of 76 considered.
 Medical Corps (MC) - 56 selected out of 201 considered.Colonel (P0623C) selection statistics:

Line of the Air Force - Judge Advocate General (LAF-J) - 21 selected out of 100 considered.
 Nurse Corps (NC) - 12 selected out of 57 considered.
 Biomedical Sciences Corps (BSC) - 10 selected out of 59 considered.Lieutenant Colonel (P0523C) selection statistics:

Line of the Air Force - Judge Advocate General (LAF-J) - 35 selected out of 77 considered.
 Chaplain - 12 selected out of 34 considered.Major (P0423D) selection statistics:

Biomedical Sciences Corps (BSC) 131 selected out of 159 considered.The complete list of Airmen selected for promotion is available online by visiting AFPC’s **Officer Promotion webpage**.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



promotion 



officer 



field grade 



selection 



colonel 



lieutenant colonel 



major