alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4968]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 ADMINISTRATION CHARGED WITH USING SCARE TACTICS, DISHONEST CLICHES IN 
                             BUDGET DEBATE

  (Mr. LINDER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, for several weeks, Democrats have attempted 
to use shameless scare tactics to dismiss the Republican plan to 
balance the budget. Americans see through this sham.
  In recent days, administration officials Tyson and Panetta have 
suggested the budget does not really need to be balanced by the year 
2002. Americans know better.
  The Democrats are not fooling anybody. Even the Washington Post 
acknowledges that the Democrats' complaints are ``hollow and 
unpersuasive.'' The Post calls the Clinton administration budget ``weak 
and directionless.'' In fact, the Post urges the Democrats to ``stop 
playing it cute,'' and the President to ``lead on this issue.''
  It is disconcerting that the President of the United States would 
abandon the American people in this manner, but he has. He refused to 
submit a balanced budget. Thus challenge should be tackled in a 
bipartisan fashion with input from the Congress and the President. 
Unfortunately, the President has chosen not to contribute and House 
Democrats offer nothing but dishonest cliches.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the amended annual report of Power REIT
(the "Trust") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December
31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
David H. Lesser, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Trustees and
Arun Mittal, Vice President Business Development and Secretary-
Treasurer, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.


/s/ David H. Lesser
David H. Lesser
CEO and Chairman of the Board of Trustees

Date:  December 19, 2012



/s/ Arun Mittal
Arun Mittal
Secretary-Treasurer and VP
  Business Development

Date:  December 19, 2012
News United States Air Force
 Physical training uniform shortages through summerPublished April 1, 2014
                **Washington (AFNS) --**
                Airmen trying to keep chilly temperatures from affecting their workout may have a difficult time finding the Air Force improved physical training uniform, or IPTU, pants and jackets this spring and summer.
The new issued IPTU is made with a softer fabric and will replace the legacy physical training uniform, which was made of a material that created a swishing sound during movement. There will be a transition period as the legacy stock is depleted and the new stock is ordered. The shorts have already transitioned and the T-shirt is not affected. 
“We are in the process of transitioning sources for the pants and jacket,” said Chief Master Sgt. Kecia Uyeno, the Air Force uniform programs and policies chief. “We expect a full stock of the IPTU pants and jackets back in Army and Air Force Exchange Service stores no later than Oct. 1.”
During the transition period, the chief encourages Airmen to rely on additional physical training uniform combinations outlined in *Air Force Instruction 36-2903, "Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel*.*"*
“There is a host of long-sleeve and form-fitting sportswear undergarment options available and perfectly within Air Force regulations to augment the uniform for inclement weather,” Uyeno said. “Additionally, the legacy and PT gear jacket and pants also remain available.” *(Courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)*fitness 



uniforms 



PT Related Links
        Air Force Instruction 36-2903, "Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel."
News United States Air Force
 T-38 Talon Repair Inspection and Maintenance program launches at JBSA-RandolphPublished Aug. 30, 2022
                        
                        By Jim Bono
                        
                        
                        502nd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The**T-38 Talon**will undergo Talon Repair Inspection and Maintenance, or TRIM, modification to perform localized, depot-level maintenance to replace or repair key parts to keep these valuable training platforms mission ready.“This program is vital to maintaining the service life of the airframe” said BillMickley, T-38 Airframe Lead Program manager. “The TRIM modification will address aging airframe-related issues to preclude grounding of these aircraft prior to its eventual retirement.”It is estimated that each aircraft will receive more than 6,000 hours of maintenance and then be returned to their home units both at**Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph**and across theU.S. Maintenance will be performed on 190 T-38 aircraft and then they will be returned to their home units across the U.S. Air Force and the Navy Test Pilot School.“The program will ensure aircraft availability for the necessary pilot training hours until the fleet is replaced by the**T-7A Red Hawk**, the all-new advanced pilot training system,”Mickley said. “Mission readiness is the key task for the depot heading the effort. Focused maintenance such as this will allow the T-38 to remain safe and relevant throughout its anticipated, 80-year lifespan.”The T-38 Talon is a twin-engine, high-altitude, supersonic jet trainer used in a variety of roles because of its design, ease of maintenance and safety record.**Air Education and Training Command**is the primary user of the T-38 for joint specialized undergraduate pilot training.**Air Combat Command**,**Air Force Materiel Command**and**NASA******also use the T-38A in various roles.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AETC 



Air Education and Training Command 



T-38 



Talon 



maintenance 



readiness 



TRIM 



Talon Repair Inspection and Maintenance 



Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph 



T-7A 



Red Hawk 



Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training Related Links
        First T-7A Red Hawk rolls out
                                April 28, 2022
                                The first T-7A Red Hawk training aircraft rolled off the production line at the Boeing Defense, Space & Security building at Lambert International Airport.
<Page>


                                                                      Exhibit 99

                        Report of Auditor Representation

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR REPRESENTATION

To the Securities Exchange Commission
Washington DC

Arthur Andersen Sp. z o.o. has represented to Poland Communications, Inc. that
its audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit,
availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Poland Communications, Inc.
News United States Air Force
 CSAF begins counterpart visit in ChinaPublished Sept. 25, 2013
                **BEIJING (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III, Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle, the Pacific Air Forces commander, and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody arrived here Sep. 24 as part of a weeklong visit to China.
On invitation from the Chinese government, Welsh is the first U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff in 15 years to visit the country.
Welsh met with his Chinese counterpart, People's Liberation Army air force Commander Gen. Ma Xiaotian and various other Chinese military officials as part of his first full day in the country and will meet with Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission Gen. Xu Qiliang Sep. 26.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced the trip earlier this fall as one of several visits by U.S. senior military leadership and reciprocal Chinese military leadership visits to the United States during the remainder of this year and in 2014. Hagel said, “The China-U.S. relationship is important for stability and security in the Asia Pacific and achieving security and prosperity for our two nations in the 21st century. A sustained, substantive military-to-military relationship is an important pillar for this strong bilateral relationship.”CSAF 



CMSAF 



China Related Links
        GENERAL HERBERT J. "HAWK" CARLISLE
                                July 14, 2015
                                Gen. Herbert J. "Hawk" Carlisle Commander, Air Combat Command, Langley Air Force Base, Virginia. As the commander, he is responsible for organizing, training, equipping and maintaining combat-ready forces for rapid deployment and employment while ensuring strategic air defense forces are ready to
            
            GENERAL MARK A. WELSH III
                                June 18, 2015
                                Gen. Mark A. Welsh III is Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C. As Chief, he serves as the senior uniformed Air Force officer responsible for the organization, training and equipping of 660,000 active-duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian forces serving in the United States and
            
            CHIEF MASTER SERGEANT OF THE AIR FORCE JAMES A. CODY
                                Jan. 25, 2013
                                Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force James A. Cody represents the highest enlisted level of leadership, and as such, provides direction for the enlisted force and represents their interests, as appropriate, to the American public, and to those in all levels of government. He serves as the personal
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID KENT FITCH, a.k.a. David Lee Krause, a.k.a. Daniel Joseph O’ Hare,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.
CALVIN JOHNSON,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 17

- 55658

D.C. No. 5:16

- cv

- 01227

- DOC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018 **

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner David Kent Fitch appeals pro se from the district court’s

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition

. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Fitch contends that he is entitled to credit against h is current sentence for the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is s uitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 14 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 55658

time spent in custody from February 8, 2000, through February 22, 2007.

According to Fitch, he is entitled to this sentencing credit under Zavala v. Ives , 785
F.3d 367 (9th Ci r. 2015), and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) policy state ments, and

because his first sentence had not been discharged when his current sentence was

imposed. Reviewing de novo
, see i d. at 370
, we conclude that the district court did

not err in denying Fitch relief

. The time that Fitch seeks to apply to his current sentence was credited

towards an earlier sentence , and therefore he is not entitled to any additional credit.

See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) ; United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329, 337 (1992)

.
Zavala does not compel a contrary result. T he record shows that Fitch’s first

sentence was discharged by the time the district court imposed the current

sentence , and therefore his current sentence cannot run concurrently to his first

sentence

. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a). Finally, any alleged non

- compliance with

BO P policy statements cannot support section 2241 relief. See Reeb v. Thomas
, 636 F.3d 1224, 1227

- 28 (9th Cir. 2011)

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to consider

arguments as to the timing of the prosecutions that Fitch raised for the first time in

his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. See B rown v.

Roe , 279 F.3d 742, 744 (9th Cir. 2002). In addition, b ecause the record

conclusively s hows that Fitch was not entitled to relief under section 2241, no3 17

- 55658

evidentiary hearing was required. See Anderson v. United States , 898 F.2d 751,

753 (9th Cir.1990).

Fitch ’s motion for release pending appeal is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7528

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

RUBEN DUTERVIL, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cr-00037-WO-2; 1:16-cv00475-WO-LPA) 

Submitted: February 20, 2018 Decided: March 13, 2018

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ruben Dutervil, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Michael Meinecke, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Ruben Dutervil seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dutervil has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AF meets recruiting goal for 14th straight year

              - Published  Nov. 25, 2013

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO -- RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **
The Air Force met its active-duty enlisted recruiting goal for the 14th year in a row, and its chaplain, lines officer and health professions accession goals for fiscal 2013. 

 

The Air Force continues to recruit the highest quality applicants with nearly 98 percent of recruits in the Delayed Entry Program scoring at or above the 50th percentile on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, or ASVAB. 

 

From October 2012 through September 2013, the Air Force brought in 26,022 new enlistees and 253 prior-service members. Additionally, the Air Force brought in 32 chaplains, 847 line officers and 736 health professionals.  

 

Special Operations Airmen, Explosive Ordnance Disposal, linguists and fully qualified physicians were the most high-demand Air Force career fields in fiscal 2013.

met goalAir Force Recruiting Servicerecruiting
Honorable S. 

### PerryBrown OpinionNo. WW-321

Chairman Texas Bnployment Commission Re: Whether or not it is Austin,Texas necessary for the Texas Employment Commission to have the approval of the Board of Control of the plans, designs and specifications for the construction of a local office pear Mr. Brown: building in Midland, Texas.

You have requested the opinion of this office on whether or not it is necessary for the Texas Employment Commission to have the approval of the Board of Control of the plans, designs and specificationsfor the construction of a looal office building In Midland, Texas.

Article 

### 681,Vernon's Civil Statutes, reads as follows: "The State Board of Control, through its chief of such division, shalldesign all public buildings erected at the expense of the state where designing is not otherwiseprovidedby law or by Its appropriationbill; but in no instance shallplans or designsbe adoptedby the head of any department,board, Institution, or school, other than the state educational Institutionsof higher learning and the Texas Prison System, and the Texas State Board for Hospitals and Special Schools,unless such design and plans have been approvedby the Board.l' From the foregoing~ statute, and especlallyfr,om.the latterpart thereof, the Legislaturehas expressed its c&ear intent that no plans or designs shall be adoptedby the head of any department,board, Institutionor school,unless such design and plans have been approvedby the Board of Control. The Texas Rnployment Commission Is clearly not excluded from the operation of this statuteunder the exceptionstherein, and is therefore included in the operation of said statute.Honorable S. PerryBrown, Page 2 (WW-321)

It is our opinion that the Texas Rnployment Commissionmust have the approval of the Board of Control of the plans, designs, and epeeiflcationsfor the construction of a local office building at Midland, Texas. All Attorney General's Opinions in conflictherewith are overruled to the extent of such conflict.

WMMARY

It Is necessary for the Texas Employment Commissionto have the approval of the Board of Control of the plans, designs and specificationsfor the construction of a local officebuilding in Midland, Texas. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON AttorneyGeneral of Texas

Assistant GC:pf:jl APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman W. V. Geppert C. K. Richards John H. Mlnton, Jr. REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEYGENERAL BY: James N. Ludlum
#### Gibson v. Schoolcraft.

(No. 376, Op. Book No. 1, p. 417.)

Appeal from Palo Pinto County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 49. *Bills of exceptions; statement of facts; assignment of errors.*In this case there is no assignment of errors, no bills of exceptions, and the paper purporting *25to be a statement of facts is not approved or certified by the judge, and therefore cannot be treated as a statement of facts. [Pas. Dig. arts. 1391 and 1490; Rules of Supreme Ct. No. 22; 32 Tex. 18; 25 Tex. 350; Murchison v. Holley, 40 Tex. 439.] In the absence of an assignment of errors, only such errors can be considered as go to the foundation of the action. [44 Tex. 649.]

May 21, 1877.

§ 50. *Assignment of errors, necessity for.*The statute upon this subject is mandatory and emphatic, and was evidently intended as well to enable this court to make a proper disposition of the cases brought before it as for the protection of appellees and defendants in error. We do not, therefore, regard the mere submission of a case by the parties on briefs as obviating an observance of this plain requirement of law. [Davenport v. Hervey, 30 Tex. 309.]

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4934]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          REMOVAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 1114

  Mr. ROYCE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that my name be 
removed as a cosponsor of H.R. 1114.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from California?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
July 3, 2019
No. 04-18-00524-CR
Braulio TIRADO-MORALES ,

Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6200 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s brief

in these companion cases was originally due to be filed on June 3, 2019. On June 7, 2019, this court granted the State’s first motion for extension of time to file its brief until July 18, 2019—an extension of forty-five (45) days. On June 28, 2019, the State filed its second motion for extension of time to file its brief, requesting an extension until ten (10) days after the court reporter files a requested supplemental reporter’s record. The court reporter has indicated she needs until August 20, 2019 to file the supplemental record.
The State’s motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the court reporter file the supplemental reporter’s record by no later than August 20, 2019. It is further ORDERED that the State’s brief is due no later than August 30, 2019—a total extension of eighty-eight (88) days. Further requests for extension of time to file the State’s brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of July, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court