alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 PACAF Airmen conduct information exchange in PhilippinesPublished Feb. 2, 2023
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Hailey Haux
                        
                        
                        Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs
                **BASA AIR BASE, Philippines (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from the **Pacific Air Forces** area of responsibility traveled to Basa and Clark Air Bases, Philippines, to conduct several Subject Matter Expert Exchanges with airmen from the Philippine Air Force, Jan. 23 through 27, 2023.

The SMEEs involved discussions of munitions, maintenance, logistics and hot pit refueling and were held as a precursor to cooperation in future large exercises in the Indo-Pacific region.

“These SMEEs are really great collaborations between the two forces and lay the foundation toward a more detailed execution like Balikatan and Cope Thunder,” said Philippine Air Force 1st Lt. Carlo Emmanuel Canlas, event lead. “It’s important for the PAF and PACAF to improve coordination so future operations and exercises can be successful.”

Throughout the five-day event, PACAF Airmen discussed topics with their PAF counterparts, such as explosive safety, expeditionary munitions storage, protective facility designs, logistics to move the force from one location to another, hot pit operations, flying hour programs and maintenance scheduling.

“We were able to share our different programs with each other, which was incredibly insightful,” said U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Rainier Raquion, 154th Wing Maintenance Operations, NCO in charge of Flight, Plans and Scheduling.

Hawaii is one of the State Partners of the Philippines through the **State Partnership Program**—or SPP—which began in 2000. One key aspect of the SPP links a unique component of the **Defense Department**–a state's National Guard—with the armed forces, or equivalent, of a partner country in a cooperative, mutually beneficial relationship.

Through the SPP, the National Guard conducts military-to-military engagements in support of defense security goals. The program also leverages whole-of-society relationships and capabilities to facilitate broader interagency engagements spanning military, government, economic and social spheres.

At the end of the exchanges, both nation’s Airmen gathered for a debrief where leaders discussed the progress that was made and what they hoped to accomplish with future engagements.

“This was an incredibly successful SMEE,” said U.S. Air Force Capt. Jennifer Nuanes, 154th Wing, Aircraft Maintenance Unit officer. “It wasn’t just the information sharing that made it successful. It was the sharing of our cultures, our food and our experiences that built deeper relationships between our two countries. I look forward to future engagements and further enhancing these strong bonds.”LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



PACAF 



Pacific Air Forces 



Basa Air Base 



Philippines 



subject matter expert exchanges 



SMEE 



Indo-Pacific 



State Partnership Program 



SPP 



interoperability
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 29, 2019

a1021

Order 

Clerk

October 29, 2019

158975

In re ANTWINE.

_________________________________________

DENNIS DAVID ANTWINE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 158975

COA: 345176

BRANCH CIRCUIT JUDGE,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2018 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Career Intermission Program, F-35 Agile Communications, World Class Athlete ProgramPublished April 8, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force includes how the Career Intermission Program is accepting applications for this year to provide a chance for Airmen and Guardians to pursue interests or needs outside the service temporarily; the 388th Operational Support Squadron at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, is working on high-speed, secure communications for the F-35A when operating from remote and austere locations; and the World Class Athlete Program and Air Force Shooting are relocating to Colorado Springs, Colorado. (Hosted by Senior Airman Kahdija Slaughter)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Career Intermission Program application window opens April 1, reduces service obligation****- Hill AFB’s 388th OSS exploring agile communications options for F-35A****- Air Force World Class Athlete, shooting programs relocated to Colorado Springs**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



Career Intermission Program 



Agile Communications 



World Class Athlete Program
#### Jacob Porter v. Henry Klahn.

(No. —, Op. Book No. *2,*p. 20.)

Application for *mandamus*from Cameron County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 528. *Mandamus; in what cases the writ will issue.*Application is made direct to this court for a writ of *mandamus*to compel the defendant to set aside, vacate and annul a judgment rendered by him as county judge, in a case pending before the county court, entitled The State v. Jacob Porter, in which the county court sustained the motion of the county attorney to dismiss the appeal. The object of the prayer for the writ is to require defendant to grant applicant his right of appeal and a trial *de novo*in said county court, the cause having originated in a justice’s court, from which the appeal was taken to the county court.

A writ of *mandamus*will only issue to an officer when the duty to be performed is ministerial in its character, but not where the exercise of judgment or discretion is required. Where the law prescribes the duties to be performed with such precision and certainty as to leave nothing to the exercise of discretion or judgment, the act is ministerial; but where the act to be done involves the exercise of discretion or judgment, it is not to be deemed merely ministerial. [Commissioner Gen. Land Office v. Smith, 5 Tex. 471; Asberry v. Beavers, 6 Tex. 467.]

The most important principle to be observed .in the exercise of jurisdiction by *mandamus,*and one which lies at the very foundation of the entire system of rules and principles regulating the use of this extraordinary remedy, is that which fixes the distinction between the duties of a peremptory or mandatory nature, and those which are discretionary in their character, involving the exercise of some degree of judgment on the part of the officer or body against whom the *mandamus*is sought. This distinction may be said to be the key to the extended system *266of rules and precedents forming the law of *mandamus.*[High on Extr. Legal Remedies, sec. 24.] The writ cannot issue when discretion and judgment are to be exercised by the officer, and only in cases where the relator is without other adequate remedy. Officers to whom public duties are confided are not subject to control in the exercise of the judgment and discretion which the law reposes in them as part of their official duty, by writ of *mandamus.*[United States v. Seaman, 17 How. 230; Comm’r of Patents v. Whitely, 4 Wall. 522; U. S. v. McGarrahan, 9 Wall. 312; Gaines v. Thompson, 7 Wall. 347.]

December 11, 1878.

§ 529. *Power and authority of county judge.*The judge of the county court is intrusted by law with the power to decide motions and questions that arise in causes before him, and. his actions thereon being judicial acts, in the discharge of such official duties as are conferred by statute, cannot be revised as relator asks may be done by this court in the case at bar. This court has no jurisdiction of the cause on appeal, the amount of the judgment not exceeding $20, exclusive of costs. The effect of granting the relief prayed for would be to make the writ of *mandamus*serve the purpose of an appeal in cases where an appeal does not lie.

Dismissed.
[No. 24225-7-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### Jacqueline R. Gordon, *Appellant,*v. Earl H. Gordon, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-2-12360-4, John Arthur McCarthy, J., entered December 15, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)






I, Alyson M. Mount, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




Date:  March 28, 2014






By:/s/ Alyson M. Mount




Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
News United States Air Force
 China Aerospace Studies Institute introduces research, analysis toolkit for commandersPublished March 8, 2023
                        
                        
                        Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS)  --**
                The Department of the Air Force launched a toolkit March 8, providing a supplemental resource for commanders to tailor training specifically oriented to the United States’ pacing challenge.
Developed by **Air University**'s **China Aerospace Studies Institute**, or CASI, the **China Toolkit** contains a repository of Department of Defense and external videos, presentations, articles and studies on China, the Chinese Communist Party, and the People’s Liberation Army.CASI TOOLKIT ScreenshotShown is a screenshot of Air University’s China Aerospace Studies Institute’s homepage. On March 8, 2023, the Department of the Air Force launched a toolkit providing a supplemental resource for commanders to tailor training specifically oriented to the United States’ pacing challenge. (Air University screenshot)
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res

    











CASI’s studies of China’s aerospace forces and the civilian and commercial infrastructure that supports them, offer DAF leaders the tools to make informed decisions and determine limitations, opportunities and challenges in competition.
Ranging from foundational information, strategic context, and specific interest items and capabilities, the resources offer Airmen and **Guardians** an explanation of why it matters to educate themselves and their units on challenges with respect to China.
Within the **China Toolkit**, Airmen and Guardians have access to:
- CASI Primer and China 101 Brief explaining trends in China’s military air, space and missile forces
- Diplomatic, Informational, Military and Economic (DIME) spectrum
- People’s Liberation Army breakdown per service
- PLA capabilities and threats videos and overviews
- “In their own Words” series of Chinese transcribed publications
- Think Tank products
“Understanding China is the pacing challenge as articulated in the **National Defense Strategy**, we must **accelerate** learning across the Air Force to stay ahead of the pace,” said Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. CQ Brown, Jr**.
The China Toolkit is available **here**.*CASI serves as the Department of Air Force’s premiere center for the study of China and its aerospace capabilities. The mission of CASI is to advance understanding of the strategy, doctrine, operating concepts, capabilities, personnel, training, organization, of China’s aerospace forces and the civilian and commercial infrastructure that supports them.*LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



toolkit 



China Toolkit 



Air University 



China Aerospace Studies Institute 



casi 



China 



ccp 



PLA 



China 101 



readiness 



One Team One Fight 



pacing challenges 



leader priorities 



CSAF 



Gen. CQ Brown Jr. 



Maxwell AFB
<Page>


                                                                          [LOGO]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to Registration
Statement No. 033-19421 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
on Form N-4, of our report dated February 28, 2003 of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company Variable Account D relating to the financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the
reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of Additional
Information.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
December 4, 2003
#### Phillips & Warrick v. P. Sass.

(No. 1297, R. Book No. 4, p. 205.)

Appeal from Lee County.

November 1, 1882.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 246. *Costs on appeal from justice’s court.*Where, on appeal to county court, the judgment of the justice is reduced, the appellant is entitled to recover his costs in the county court, unless the court for good cause, to be stated on the record, adjudge the costs otherwise. [Rev. Stats, arts. 1432, 1434.]

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,229,667
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            29,100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,053,149
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,433,707
<LOANS>                                     51,214,343
<ALLOWANCE>                                    894,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,381,481
<DEPOSITS>                                  82,053,073
<SHORT-TERM>                                   314,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            837,306
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,443,840
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,732,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              20,176,202
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,392,051
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              194,558
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               364,458
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,951,067
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             471,391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475,193
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,475,874
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   75,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,041,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                564,344
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     352,444
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   352,444
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    620,035
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,091,484
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               820,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,372
<RECOVERIES>                                       545
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              894,427
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           894,427
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### James Jackson v. W. C. Browning & Co.

(No. 41, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 61.)

Appeal from Houston County.

March 19, 1877.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 605. *Demurrer and exceptions; petition for injunction.*We must take the allegations of the petition to be true in considering the action of the court on the exceptions and demurrer to the petition. We believe that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer and exceptions to the petition, and in dissolving the injunction and dismissing the bill.

§ 606. *Execution; right of defendant to point out property to he levied upon.*The defendant in execution, his agent or attorney, in all cases, has the right to designate the property to be levied on, provided said property shall be in the county where judgment shall have been rendered, or to which the execution may be issued; if the defendant,- his agent or attorney, shall fail or refuse to designate the same, it being his own property, then levy shall be made by the officer. [Pas. Dig. art. 3775.]

In Eoss v. Lister, 14 Tex. 469, the head-notes are not supported by the decision. The demand in that case had been made of, and defendant had failed to point out.

Eeversed and remanded.
No. 87-519.

#### Maynard, Warden, et al. *v.*Cartwright.

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 484 U. S. 1003.] Motion of Roger Dale Hayes for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4934]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 PERMISSION FOR COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS TO SIT TOMORROW, 
              TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1995, DURING 5-MINUTE RULE

  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Committee on International Relations and its subcommittees be permitted 
to sit tomorrow while the House is meeting in the Committee of the 
Whole under the 5-minute rule.
  It is my understanding the minority has been consulted and there is 
no objection to this request.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Alaska?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force leaders commemorate Martin Luther King Jr. birthday

              - Published  Jan. 17, 2014

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody issued the following message to the Airmen of the U.S. Air Force: 

 

As America commemorates the federal holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., we call upon all Airmen to reflect on Dr. King’s enduring legacy and on the importance of service in the cause of justice, equality, respect, and freedom.

 

At the height of the U.S. civil rights movement, Dr. King rallied our Nation to live up to the promise of full equality under the law, without regard to race, color, or creed. Striving to build on Dr. King’s legacy today, we have a responsibility to ensure that all Americans enjoy their right to equal opportunity and constitutional protections.  

 

Each of our unique personal histories, experiences, knowledge, and skills reflect a diversity that is one of our Nation’s greatest strengths. Air Force leaders are committed to creating an environment that promotes dignity and respect and brings together different backgrounds and perspectives to benefit mission effectiveness.  Embracing each Airman’s talents and capabilities will help build and sustain a diverse and inclusive culture that strengthens our Service.

 

In celebration of 50 years following Dr. King’s historic march on Washington, his life of service demonstrates the power in each of us to energize and create positive change. On Martin Luther King, Jr., Day, we encourage you to reflect on the lasting impact of Dr. King’s ideals and their continuing relevance today.

Senior Leaderscommemoration messageMartin Luther King Jr.