alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Chief turns hobby into 500 mile trekPublished Aug. 26, 2013
                        
                        By Senior Airman Phillip Houk
                        
                        
                        460th Space Wing Public Affairs
                **BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen face many challenges every day that range from physical training to difficult work related tasks, but rarely does any Airman, including a chief, face the challenge of a nearly 500 mile bike ride.
With less than a year left before he retires, Chief Master Sgt. Alan Onufrak, 460th Medical Group superintendent, rode in the Registers Annual Great Bicycle Ride Across Iowa on the Air Force team, all while helping fellow cyclists, recruiting and completing the challenge. 
According to the RAGBRAI website, the event is a bicycle ride not a race, averaging around 468 miles and lasting a full week. Each year more than 20,000 cyclist complete this challenge, with 95 members serving on the Air Force team.
"You do not have to be in real great shape to get across the ride," said Onufrak, "but to ride 468 miles in 7 days does take a bit of conditioning."
Onufrak participated in RAGBRAI as part of the Air Force Cycling team. This team has participated for 19 years, using the opportunity to help others and spread a positive Air Force message. 
"This is just a ride where you go at your own pace," the chief explained. "We all participate to be recruiters and spend as much time as possible in the towns. When you have a town that has a population of 1000 and over the course of a day more than 35,000 people pass through, to be the person to stop and help fix a tire or have lunch at a local restaurant, you can make a huge difference."
Since the last time Onufrak participated in RAGBRAI, he has kept up his cycling abilities while balancing his professional duties and personal life.
"I have a Trek 1200 road bike, not one of the fanciest, but a great bike," said Onufrak. "I have put more than 10,000 miles on that bike since 2006. I try to get out at least once a week, and more when I can, but sometimes it is difficult to find a balance between being a chief, a dad, having a family and church.
This is the second time Onufrak has participated in RAGBRAI but it was his last.
"I was part of RAGBRAI back in 2006," Onufrak said, "I wanted to do it this year because I am retiring at the end of this year, so this is my last opportunities to represent the Air Force as an active-duty member." 
After over 29 years of service, Onufrak is ready to keep cycling and join the ranks of Air Force retired. 
"I enjoyed serving on the Air Force team for my last time as an active-duty member," the Chief said. "There is always an opportunity to do this when I retire, but I think twice is enough for me."500-mile bike ride 



Iowa 



bike 



 



RAGBRAI
Exhibit 23.1

 

**SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs**

*PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS*

www.sealebeers.com

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

 

We consent to the use, in the statement on Form10K of ATVROCKN, Inc., of our report dated October 10, 2012 and 2011 on our audit of the financial statements of ATVROCKN, Inc.as of May 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearsthen ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and since inception on December 27, 2010 through May 31, 2012, and the reference to us underthe caption “Experts.”

 

 

***/s/******Seale andBeers, CPAs***

 

Seale and Beers,CPAs

Las Vegas, Nevada

October 10, 2012

 

 

***Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB &CPAB Registered Auditors***

**50 S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 LasVegas, NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351**
EXHIBIT 12-1





Computation of ratios


(Dollars in thousands)





Twenty-eight weeks EndedAugust 12, 2002

August 13, 2001Income (loss) before fixed charges:Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change for goodwill

$
21,822

$
(72,048
)Fixed charges


40,943


48,752$
62,765

$
(23,296
)Fixed charges:Interest expense

$
24,222

$
35,031Interest expense component of rent expense (1)


16,721


13,721$
40,943

$
48,752Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges


N/A

$
72,048Facility action charges, net


3,633


58,707Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges excluding facility action charges, net


N/A

$
13,341Fixed charges coverage ratio


1.5X


N/A


---

|(1) |  | Calculated as one-third of rent expense
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------
Order entered June 4, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00696
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF I . L.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 09
- 0 7655 

### O RDE R Before the Court is appellant’s May 28, 2013 motion for an order granting him status as an indigent for purposes of appeal. We GRANT appellant’s motion. Appellant is considered indigent for purposes of the appeal and is allowed to proceed without prep ayment of costs.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MELVIN SAUNDERS.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Gulp, Col. & St. Fe R. R. Co. v. A. J. Flake.

(No. 2444, R. Book No. 4, p. 217.)

Appeal from Bell County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 253. *Continuance with reference to service of citation.*In determining the correctness of the ruling of the trial court upon an application for a continuance otherwise apparently good upon its face, the question of diligence, where the subpoena has not been executed, would depend very much upon the time when defendant was cited, with reference to the date of the issuance of his subpoena for the absent witness; and the date of the service of citation should be shown in order to enable this court to determine this question satisfactorily.

§ 254. *Railroad company; liability of, for damages occasioned by a contractor whilst constructing the road.*The doctrine is settled that the relation of principal and agent and master and servant does not subsist in the case of an independent employee or contractor, who is not under the immediate direction of the employer, and that *100the railroad company is not therefore liable for injuries occasioned by them. [Cunningham v. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. 51 Tex. 503; H. & T. C. R. R. Co. v. Van Bayless (Court of Appeals), *post,*p. 247.] But under the law, a railroad company, in the construction of its line of road through the inclosed lands of persons, owes to the owners of such lands a legal duty to protect such lands from injury. It cannot be doubted that the duty of placing stock guards, preserving or supplying the fences, so far at least as on the right of way, *and protecting the inclosure from injury in the construction of the road,*is a duty to the proprietor from the railroad, annexed by statute to the privilege granted the corporation, and that the failure to perform that duty is unexcused, though its nonperformance may have resulted from the negligence of a contractor. The principle that a duty to the public or to an individual cannot be devolved on a contractor has been enforced in numerous cases. [H. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Meador, 50 Tex. 77.]

November 1, 1882.

Affirmed.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. MorganChase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2011‐C5 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Paying Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor,and KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate CapitalMarkets, Inc.), as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2019

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

 

 

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6949]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Ogilvie, offered the following prayer:
  Lord of all life, Sovereign of this Nation, we ask You to bless the 
women and men of this Senate as they press on to express their 
convictions on the soul-sized fiscal issues confronting our Nation.
  In these days of discussion, when priorities must be set and 
differences are sharply focused, we need a special measure of Your 
grace. In the debate over what it will take to balance the budget, and 
when and how this can be achieved, there will be strong disagreement. 
We will need Your wisdom and Your guidance to practice the fine art of 
creative compromise, so that the budget will reflect what is best for 
our Nation both now and for the future. Liberate us from the polarities 
of presuppositions that keep us from moving toward consensus. Help each 
Senator to speak the truth as he or she sees it, listen carefully to 
differing points of view, and then be willing to find workable 
solutions. Guide us through these days of discord and division and 
bring us to a resolution in which there is no victor except the people 
of this Nation. In Your reconciling name. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
China Cable and Communication,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March
31, 2005, I, Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan, the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to the  best  of the
undersigned knowledge and belief:

      (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  the information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: June 20, 2005                               /s/ Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RILLA HUML,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SERVIS ONE, INC., DBA BSI Financial Services, a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in California; WILMINGTON TRUST FUND SOCIETY FSB, a Delaware corporation, doing business, but not authorize do business, as CHRISTIANA TRUST in California) as T rustee, for BROUGHAM FUND I TRUST, an unknown entity; ZIEVE, BRODNAX AND STEELE, LLP, a California Limited Liability Partnership; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., S/B/M Wachovia Mortgage, FSB; WELLS FARGO BANK SOUTH CENTRAL, N.A.; DOES, 1 through 10,

Defen dants

- Appellees. No. 22

- 55362

D.C. No.

8:20

- cv

- 00489

- DOC

- KES

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted De cember 5, 2023 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

# FILED

DEC 5 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Rilla Huml appeals pro se after voluntarily dismissing without prejudice her

claims against Wilmington Trust Fund Society FSB, the sole remaining defendant

in Huml’s action alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate

Settlement Procedu res Act, and state law stemming from the servicing and transfer

of her mortgage loan. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Huml’s notice of appeal was timely only as to her voluntary dismissal of the

claims without prejudice. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (notice of appeal must be

filed 30 days after judgment or order appealed); Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205,

214 (2007) (“ [ T ] he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a

jurisdictional requirement

. ”)

. “A voluntary dismissal without prejudice is

ordinarily not a final judgment from which the plaintiff may appeal ,” unless “1)

there [is] no evidence of any attempt to manipulate appellate jurisdiction; and 2)

the plaintiff . . . sought the district court’s permission to dismiss the remaining

claims.” Galaza v. Wolf

, 954 F.3d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir. 2020 ) (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted ). Because Huml did not seek the “approval and

meaningful participation of the district court” in the dismissal of her claims, such

as by seeking entry of partial final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).3

54(b), we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Id. at 1272; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) ;

see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller , 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc)

(“[A] plaintiff, who has been given leave to amend, may not file a notice of appeal

simply because he does not choose to file an amended complaint. A further district

court determination must be obtained.”)

.

Wells Fargo’s request for judicial notice, Dkt. Entry No. 15, is denied.

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Strasbaugh (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:




1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  May 14, 2010

By:/s/ CHUCK SCHILLINGSChuck SchillingsPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)Dated:  May 14, 2010

By:/s/RICHARD NANCERichard NanceChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 10, 2009 (the
Quarterly Report) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 16, 2009
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

SpaceDev,  Inc.
San  Diego,  California


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-47338) of SpaceDev, Inc. of our
report  dated  February  10,  2005,  relating  to  the  consolidated   financial
statements  of  SpaceDev, Inc., appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2004.





San  Diego,  California                            PKF
March  28,  2005                                   Certified  Public Accountants
                                                   A  Professional  Corporation
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 100 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent veterans’ contributions to education benefits from reducing Federal student financial assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. DAVIS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent 

veterans’ contributions to education benefits from reducing Federal student financial assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Equity in 

5 Education Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 100 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VETERANS’ EDUCATION BENEFITS 

2 IN ESTIMATED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CAL3 CULATION. 

4 Section 480(j) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

5 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(j)) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), for the first 

8 year a student receives veterans’ education benefits under 

9 chapter 30 of title 38, United States Code, the amount 

10 of such veterans’ education benefits that is treated as esti11 mated financial assistance not received under this title for 

12 the purposes of section 471(3) shall be calculated by sub13 tracting the amount that the student’s basic pay was re14 duced under section 3011(b) or 3012(c) of such title in 

15 order to be eligible to receive such benefits from the 

16 amount of such veterans’ education benefits.’’. 

17 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 

19 on July 1, 2007. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION



SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION



1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN



SIXTH AMENDMENT



 
Pursuant to a consent resolution unanimously passed by the Board of Directors on March 2, 2001, and subsequently approved by appropriate regulatory authorities and an affirmative vote of the shareholders, the Company's 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, is modified as follows:



The second sentence in Section 2 shall be amended from: 



"The number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to options granted under this Plan shall not exceed 2,336,000 shares of Common Stock, as such Common Stock was constituted on the effective date of this Plan, or such greater number as may be approved from time to time by the shareholders of the Company."



To the Following:



"The number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to options granted under this Plan shall not exceed 3,136,000 shares of Common Stock, as such Common Stock was constituted on the effective date of this Plan, or such greater number as may be approved from time to time by the shareholders of the Company."



No other changes to the 1994 Stock Option Plan are made as a result of this Sixth Amendment to the Plan.
#### Flynn & McSpadden v. David Lynch.

(No. 1096, Op. Book No. 2, p. 377.)

Appeal from Fort Bend County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 787. *Sequestration bond; must be in an amount at least double the value of the property; replevy bond not valid unless sequestration bond is.*Lynch sued Flynn & McSpadden for property valued at $135. He obtained a sequestration upon giving a bond in the sum of $200. The *433writ was levied upon the property, and Flynn & McSpadden replevied by giving bond in the sum of $270. On appeal from justice’s to county court, the latter court refused to quash the sequestration proceedings, and rendered judgment against Flynn & McSpadden and the sureties upon their replevy bond for the value of th e property and the hire thereof. *Held,*the sequestration bond was not in compliance with the law, and should have been quashed. The law requires that such bond “ shall be for a sum of money not less than double the value of the property to be sequestered.” [R. S. 4192.] The sequestration bond being invalid, all proceedings occasioned by, incident to, or growing out .of it, were, void, and it was error, therefore, to render judgment against the sureties upon the replevy bond; and the sureties having appealed in this case are entitled to have the judgment as against them set aside. [Chatham v. Riddle, 8 Tex. 162.]

March 12, 1881.

§'788. *Hire; of wagon and team; excessive estimate of.*The property sued for and sequestrated was a mule and a wagon. The hire of the same was estimated on the trial in the court at $1 per day for the mule, and fifty cents per day for the wagon, for four hundred and sixty-three days. *Held,*that the proper mode of estimating the hire of the mule and wagon was not by the day. Such an estimate is not a reasonable one for the length of time for which the jury were called upon to assess hire. [Hutson v. Wilkinson, 45 Tex. 444.]

Reversed and remanded.