alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Maintainers use ultrasound to keep KC-10s ready to flyPublished Nov. 4, 2013
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Patrick Harrower
                        
                        
                        60th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs
                **TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                When most people hear the term ultrasound, they might think of the machine that helps monitor the health and development of the early stages of life.
For the Airmen of the 60th Maintenance Squadron nondestructive inspections shop, an ultrasound inspection can be surprisingly similar to that.
According to one technician, inside the tail section of a KC-10 Extender is a control box that can be moved up and down, which in turn, causes the elevators on the tail to move. The location of the control box is difficult to get to. The area is cramped, dark and can get warm. However, much like any other aircraft component, it still must be inspected regularly.
"Every KC-10 gets this inspection every 90 days," said Staff Sgt. Rebecca Linden de Romero, 60th MXS. "We use ultrasound technology to see what is going on inside the panels of the box. The sound reflects through the surface and back to the machine where we can track any cracks or other potential problems the naked eye cannot see."
To maintain total accuracy, the technicians use standard blocks that are made with the same material and physical dimensions as the parts on the aircraft, Linden de Romero said. These blocks are used to calibrate the ultrasound equipment before the inspection to give the technicians a frame of reference for exactly what they should see.
Linden de Romero commented that the measurements must be precise, as the condition of the plane can be based on them. If the technicians find a problem that deems the aircraft bad, it must go to another base for higher-level repair.
Accuracy aside, there also is a physical component that presents a unique challenge to the technicians when they perform an ultrasound.
"We can inspect 98 percent of the area just fine," said Tech Sgt. Zach Williams, 349th MXS. "But for 100 percent coverage, someone needs to go inside of the box. Our whole shop could be fully qualified to do the inspection, but if nobody can physically get in there, we can't call the job complete."
The 60th MXS nondestructive inspections shop spends a lot of time ensuring technicians know how to perform an ultrasound inspection, he said.
"We have gotten so proficient at this inspection that we have a lot of engineers come to us to have a set of Travis eyes check their work before they go somewhere else," Williams said. "It's a real confidence booster."KC-10 Extender 



Travis Air Force Base Related Links
        KC-10 Extender
                                Oct. 1, 2003
                                The KC-10 Extender is an Air Mobility Command advanced tanker and cargo aircraft designed to provide increased global mobility for U.S. armed forces.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE
SEVERANCE PLAN 
 The Lockheed Martin Corporation wishes to amend the Lockheed Martin Corporation Executive Severance Plan (“Plan”) as
follows, generally effective January 1, 2014: 
  

	 	1.	Section 6(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

 In the event an Eligible Employee who is
entitled to a Supplemental Severance Benefit becomes employed by the Company (or an Affiliate) prior to the first anniversary of his or her Executive Layoff Event, the Eligible Employee shall be obligated to repay to the Company an amount equal to
the amount of the Employee’s Supplemental Severance Benefit multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of weeks (capped at 52) in the one-year period following the Employee’s termination of employment during which the
Employee is employed by the Company and the denominator of which is fifty-two (52). 
  

			
		 	LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John T. Lucas

		 	John T. Lucas
		 	Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Communications
	
	Date: July 18, 2014
Exhibit 8.1 

**Subsidiaries of Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.**

The following chart lists each of our subsidiaries which we owned, directly or indirectly, as of December 31, 2016, and April 26, 2017: 

1. Concesionaria Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.P.I. de C.V., a variable capital investment promotion stock corporation organized underthe laws of Mexico 

2. Comercializadora Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

3. Servicios Administrativos Volaris, S.A. de C.V. a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

4. Servicios Corporativos Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

5. Operaciones Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

6. Vuela, S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of Guatemala 

7. Servicios Earhart, S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of Guatemala. 

8. Vuela Aviación, S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of Costa Rica.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 Exhibit 99.11


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                  RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC. AWARDED JUVENILE
                           JUSTICE PROGRAM IN FLORIDA


CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, APRIL 13, 2000 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) announced today that it has been awarded a contract by the Florida
Department of Juvenile Justice to operate the Southern Glades Youth Camp, a
62-bed residential conservation program for moderate-risk boys, ages 14 to 19
located in Florida City, Florida. The contract is expected to generate over $1.9
million in annual revenue.

Commenting on the new contract, Luis E. Lamela, President and CEO of Ramsay
Youth Services, Inc. stated, "We are extremely pleased to be working with the
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice on this program that provides juveniles
academic, vocational, conservation and environmental work related services."

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading quality provider and manager of
treatment, education and community-based programs for at-risk, troubled and
special needs youth. The Company has operations in 9 states and the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information.



Contact:   Isa Diaz
           Vice President Corporate Relations
           (305) 569-4626
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,060,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,564,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,725,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,165,000
<PP&E>                                      96,241,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,370,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             131,862,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,932,000
<BONDS>                                     39,531,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    324,000
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,462,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               131,862,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,072,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,979,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,280,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,260,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,489,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,064,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,221,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,843,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,843,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TIMOTHY PERRY.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Wheeler & Wilson M’f’g Co. v. R. M. Collins et al.

(No. 694, Op. Book No. 3, p. 482.)

Appeal from Wise County.

January 29, 1881.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 132. *Jurisdiction of county court to issue injunction.*A justice of the peace of Harris county rendered a judgment and issued execution thereon to Wise county, and the county judge of the latter county granted an injunction restraining the collection of the execution. *Held,*that the county judge had no jurisdiction of the subject matter, and no authority to grant the injunction.

Reversed and remanded.
NUMBER 13-11-00344-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RANDALL BOLIVAR, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Randall Bolivar, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to 

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having 

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, 
2

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

8th day of December, 2011.
#### H. & T. C. R. R. Co. v. T. R. White.

(No. 1660, Op. Book No. 3, p. 536.

Error from Travis County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 164. *Judgment by default on sworn account for damages.*Suit against a .railroad company for damages occa*65sioned by the loss or destruction of goods, as shown by an itemized account supported by the affidavit of the plaintiff, in accordance with article 2266 of the Revised Statutes. Judgment by default was rendered for the amount of the plaintiff’s claim, without other proof than the claim itself. *Held,*that article 2266 did not apply to this character of claim. To entitle a plaintiff to the benefit of that article, it must appear that the debt claimed exists by contract between the parties to the suit, either express or implied; in other words, the action must be founded upon a contract. [R. R. Co. v. Hays & Co. (Ct. *App.)post,*p. 416; R. R. Co. v. Morris (Ct. App.), *post,*p. 427,] Because of insufficient evidence, the judgment by default was set aside.

April 16. 1881.

Reversed and remanded.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2006
      (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Dated:
      July 17, 2008





/s/
                Philip HolmesPhilip
                HolmesPresident




/s/
                Robert KainzRobert
                KainzChief
                Financial Officer
VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
            CALCULATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,        NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                        1995                  1994                 1995             1994
<S>                                            <C>                <C>                  <C>                <C>
Net Income (Loss)..............................$           3,291  $              (263) $          (5,193) $          (4,561)

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding...........................       41,207,035           38,581,748         41,029,439         38,477,457

Adjustments necessary to reflect weighted
  average number of common shares
  outstanding on a fully diluted basis.........        1,095,748            1,703,911          1,201,740          1,685,065

                                                      42,302,783           40,285,659         42,231,179         40,162,522

Fully diluted net income (loss) per share......$            0.08  $             (0.01) $           (0.12) $           (0.11)

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: NATO Air Defender, DAF WPS Strategic Action Plan and AI LiteracyPublished June 30, 2023
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, NATO’s largest air exercise ever, a strategic action plan incorporating women, peace and security concepts across the department, and digital experts learn about artificial intelligence solutions. (Hosted by Staff. Sgt. Milton Hamilton)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



AI 



NATO 



Air Defender 2023 



WPS Related Links
        AI Literacy Course trains digital experts for the future
            
            DAF releases Women, Peace, Security Strategic Action Plan
            
            Germany hosts biggest ever air exercise of NATO forces
News United States Air Force
 Joint fire training in a flashPublished Aug. 8, 2013
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Soo C. Kim
                        
                        
                        374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                There's a fire burning inside a red container. Firefighters are already at the scene, but they aren't there to put it out; they're there to lock themselves inside and experience what happens next. 
The fire burns brighter, smoke rises higher and the heat begins to concentrate at the center. Suddenly, the room ignites. 
It's a training scenario for the firefighter's worst nightmare -- flashover. 
To train, educate and save lives, the 374th Civil Engineer Squadron firefighters hosted a joint training session here July 29 with Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni Aircraft Rescue firefighters. 
"A flashover is a near simultaneous ignition of every object in a confined room," said Master Sgt. Jon Ammon, the assistant chief of training with the 374th CES. 
During a fire, heat builds up in a structure's ceiling and creates a thick layer of smoke. Without proper ventilation the heat cannot escape and increases to a higher temperature until it combusts. 
The training was held in a controlled training environment, simulating a flashover fire in a closed container with limited ventilation. A seasoned instructor monitored firefighters inside and base firefighters were on standby just outside the door, in case of an emergency. 
"This training is necessary because it gives firefighters a basis to recognize a deadly situation," Ammon said. "Flashover has injured and killed dozens of firefighters over the years. It is so deadly that many of our fire regulations are built around flashover such as response times and personal protection clothing capability." 
Being focused on aircraft rescue, the flashover training was a unique experience for the visiting Marines. 
"We had a twelve hour bus ride, but the training was definitely worth it," said Marine Gunnery Sgt. Nathan Lanham, the ARFF section leader. "A lot of these guys haven't seen flashover before, and this was their first opportunity to experience it." 
More joint firefighter training opportunities are scheduled at Yokota Air Base, Japan, this year. 
"We got to train on a situation unique to us over in Iwankuni and had a chance to foster high morale with our fellow firefighters," Lanham said. "All in all, I'd say this was a mission complete for our guys."flashover 



Yokota 



Iwakuni 



training 



firefighters
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 427 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to provide 

flexibility to school food authorities in meeting certain nutritional requirements for the school lunch and breakfast programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2013 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. MORAN, Mr. COATS, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to provide flexibility to school food authorities in 

meeting certain nutritional requirements for the school 

lunch and breakfast programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sensible School Lunch 

5 Act’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 427 IS

1 SEC. 2. NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL 

2 LUNCH AND BREAKFAST PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL REIMBURSEMENT.—Section 

4 4(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Richard B. Russell National School 

5 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1753(b)(3)(A)(ii)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(III) MAXIMUM QUANTITIES.— 

8 The interim or final regulations re9 quired under this clause shall not es10 tablish a maximum quantity of grains, 

11 meat, or meat alternates that may be 

12 served in any meal or during any pe13 riod of time of any school year.’’. 

14 (b) RULES.—Section 9(a)(4)(B) of the Richard B. 

15 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 1758(a)(4)(B)) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking ‘‘Not later’’ and inserting the 

18 following: 

19 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause 

20 (ii), not later’’; and 

21 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(ii) MAXIMUM QUANTITIES.—The 

23 rules required under clause (ii) shall not 

24 establish a maximum quantity of grains, 

25 meat, or meat alternates that may be 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 427 IS

1 served in any meal or during any period of 

2 time of any school year.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 DAF’s first Data and AI Forum open for registrationPublished Aug. 3, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force’s Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Office is partnering with the Department of the Air Force-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Accelerator to present its first Data and Artificial Intelligence Forum in Lexington, Massachusetts, Aug. 24-25.

**Brig. Gen. John M. Olson**, the first DAF Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence officer, is accelerating the pace in which the Air Force fosters digital fluency and creates trusted, seamless integration of data and AI — providing dominance to the United States and its strategic partners.

Modern warfare demands information at the edge — where it’s most vulnerable. For this cause, the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Office and Department of the **Air Force-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Accelerator** are partnering to expedite the game-changing benefits of integrated data fabrics.

This summit will feature subject matter experts who will share their vast knowledge of data, AI and analytics as a part of an effort to support initiatives like the Defense Department’s Joint All-Domain Command and Control and the Air Force’s Advanced Battle Management System to respond to a critical need, connecting sensors with shooters across all services in all domains.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



data 



AI 



forum 



registration 



partnership 



Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Office 



MIT 



Artificial Intelligence Accelerator 



Brig. Gen. John M. Olson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-725

In Re: COLUMBUS FERGUSON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-92-268-P) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Columbus Ferguson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Columbus Ferguson, a federal inmate, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that a federal district judge recuse himself and that the court reporter be brought before a judicialpanel. In support of his petition, Ferguson provided mere conclusory allegations of perjury and conspiracy of the judge and thecourt reporter. Because Ferguson failed to establish any extrajudicial bias, recusal of the district judge is not warranted. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). Further, because Ferguson has not shown that he has a clear right to the relief sought against the court reporter and that no other remedy is adequate, mandamus relief is not available for his claim regarding the court reporter. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 860F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We therefore deny Ferguson's petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED