alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 DAF standardizes civilian employees’ electronic display namesPublished Jan. 11, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Beginning in January 2023, the Department of the Air Force will transition civilian employee display names on email and other online applications from their pay plan to the default ‘CIV’.
This shift will align the department with sister services and other government organizations, while also focusing on employees’ unique expertise rather than their pay plan.
“Our civilian employees provide diverse corporate knowledge and are the continuity of our organizations,” said **Alex Wagner**, assistant secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. “This change enables civilians to be identified by the scope of their portfolios and job responsibilities rather than solely by their authorized pay plan.”
Currently, there are more than 250,000 civilian accounts, including GS and NH pay grades. The Air Force Identification System will transition display names, with the exception of special agent, senior executive service, and highly qualified expert, in batches of 10,000 over a course of 18 hours to minimize disruptions.
Once this transition takes effect, members can reverse the change and maintain display of their pay grade and update other display name options, by visiting the CAC-enabled **AFID self-help portal**. Instructions are located **here**. Additionally, employees can also still put their pay plan in their signature block.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



civilian 



employee 



Display 



name 



manpower 



reserve affairs 



civ 



AFID 



Air Force Identification System 



GS 



NH
#### Orr & Lindsley v. S. V. Moore et al.

(No. 1389, Op. Book No. 3, p. 518.)

Appeal from Kaufman County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§'587. *Injunction; where there are several defendants, should not he dissolved on answer of but one, where fraud is charged in the hill.*The rule is, where fraud is charged in the bill against several parties, the answer *311must be made by *all*the defendants. “ Courts of equity are usually more strict in requiring a positive answer from *all*the defendants, before dissolving any injunction granted on the ground of *fraud,*than in ordinary cases. And when the bill implicates two defendants in the same charge of fraudulent conduct, the court will require the answers of both defendants before granting a motion to dissolve.” [High, on Injunc. (2d ed.) § 1532.]

§ 588. *Creditors; several may join in bill for injunction, tullen, etc.*That several creditors may join in filing a bill for injunction, when they have similar rights with respect to the property of their debtor, is no longer an open question. Indeed, to prevent a multiplicity of suits, this course should be commended. Such a bill is not multifarious, for it relates to but one subject matter. [Bump on Fraud. Conv. 533, 531.]

§ 589. *Void judgment; injunction against, by attaching creditors.*Appellee S. Y. Moore sued one Oarelock in the county court on two promissory notes, amounting, in the aggregate, exclusive of interest, to the sum of $1,059.10, and sued out an attachment, which was levied upon Oarelock’s goods. Moore obtained a judgment for the full amount of his claim, and for a foreclosure of his attachment lien. Appellants, and other creditors of Oarelock, joined in a suit for an injunction to restrain the sale of the property attached by Moore, alleging that Moore’s judgment was void for want of jurisdiction, and was fraudulent, and obtained for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defeating the creditors of Oarelock; and that Oarelock was insolvent, and the property levied upon was the only property subject to his debts, and was not more than sufficient to satisfy their claims. That they had filed suits upon their claims against Oarelock, and had acquired attachment liens upon the property in controversy, etc. The court below, upon exceptions made by appellees to the bill, dissolved the injunction previously granted, and dismissed the bill. *Held,*the judgment obtained by Moore against Oarelock, *312and upon which his claim to the property depended, was absolutely void, because the county court had no jurisdiction of the amount in controversy. Injunction was the proper remedy of the creditors under the circumstances of this case, and their bill showed such equity as entitled them to the relief 'prayed for. The court eired in dismissing the bill. An analogous case to this is Heyneman v. Dannenberg, 6 Cal. 376.

November 8, 1882.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32
 
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:
 
 The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Dated: March 31, 2011,
 
 
 /s/ Michael A. Yedor
 Michael A. Yedor
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 /s/ Douglas Beach
 Douglas Beach
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  18
#### T. & P. R’y Co. v. W. M. Burke.

(No. 1325, Op. Book No. 2, p. 135.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 945. *Receipt; release; parol evidence to explain, etc.*A receipt may be modified, explained or impugned by parol. [Whart. on Ev. 1067.] But a release partakes of the nature of a deed, and is not susceptible, unless fraud or mutual mistake be set up, of contradiction or variation by parol. [Whart. on Ev. 1064.]

S 946. *Release; fraud.*To overturn a written release because of fraud in obtaining it, the proof of the fraud must be clear, precise and indubitable. Slight parol evidence is insufficient. Thus it was held in a case where the plaintiff proposed to avoid a release executed by him by proof that he could neither read or write; that he did not know the contents of the paper signed by him; that he understood it to be a receipt, and that he did not intend it to be a release,— that this testimony was too slight to warrant the submission of the question of fraud to a jury. [P. R. Co. v. Shay, 82 Penn. St. 203.] And in another case it was held that parol evidence was inadmissible to show that the creditor executed the release at the request of the debtor, who promised to pay him at a certain time, and that upon that consideration he executed the release. [Stearns v. Tappin, 5 Duer, 295.] And in this case, where the plaintiff, to avoid the release executed by him, proved that he did so with the understanding, and upon the promise of the defendant, that the settlement upon which the release was executed was incorrect; that the defendant owed him a greater sum than was allowed him in that settlement, and that he executed the release protesting at the time that the settlement was incorrect, and upon the promise of the defendant’s agent that it should be corrected, it was held that this evidence was insufficient to avoid the effect of the release, and that the release was a valid defense to the plaintiff’s *532action, which was to recover an indebtedness covered by the terms of the release.

June 23, 1880.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of Cardium
Therapeutics, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                 
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher J. Reinhard                     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Christopher J. Reinhard, Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Dennis M. Mulroy                     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Dennis M. Mulroy, Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc., (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert C. Brehm,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


Date: May
                17,
                2006
              By:
              /s/ Conrad
                NagelConrad Nagel
                Principal Accounting
                  Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WINIFRED JIAU, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

KAIRE POOLE; RANDY L. TEWS, 

Warden, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 16-15147 

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00248-WHA 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Winifred Jiau, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in her 

action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of 

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15147 

We review de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). 

We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Jiau failed to 

raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether she properly exhausted her 

administrative remedies, or whether there was “something in [her] particular case 

that made the existing and generally available administrative remedies effectively 

unavailable to [her].” Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1172 (9th Cir. 2014); see 

also Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (requiring proper exhaustion, which 

means “using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the 

agency addresses the issues on the merits)” (emphasis, citation, and internal 

quotation marks omitted)). Because we affirm the district court’s summary 

judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies, we treat the 

judgment as a dismissal without prejudice. See Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 

1170 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[A] district court must dismiss a case without prejudice 

when there is no presuit exhaustion[.]” (emphasis, citation, and internal quotation 

marks omitted)). 

In light of our disposition, we do not reach the merits of Jiau’s claims.

We do not consider Jiau’s contentions concerning appointment of counsel, 
3 16-15147 

leave to amend, leave to conduct discovery, or deliberate indifference to medical 

needs because they were not properly raised before the district court. See L.A. 

News Serv. v. Reuters Television Int’l, Ltd., 149 F.3d 987, 996 (9th Cir. 1998).

We reject as unsupported by the record Jiau’s contentions that defendants 

committed perjury.

AFFIRMED.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2011-C5
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-C5 (the "Trust")

  I, Brian Baker, the President and Chief Executive Officer of J.P. Morgan
  Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., the depositor into the
  above-referenced Trust, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, an all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K, of the Trust (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Master Servicer and
    the Special Servicer have fulfilled their obligations under the Pooling
    and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Midland Loan Services,a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; KeyCorp
    Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.; Torchlight Loan Services, LLC; Wells
    Fargo Bank, National Association; and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC.

    Dated:   March 28, 2013


    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
    Securities Corp.
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Pemco Aviation Group,
Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 15 , 2004 |  | /s/ Ronald A. Aramini  
|                          |  | Ronald A. Aramini      
|                          |  | President and          
|                          |  | Chief Executive Officer





---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Pemco Aviation Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ John R. Lee        
|                         |  | John R. Lee            
|                         |  | Sr. Vice President and 
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN GUANCI.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Michael W. Perry, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



/s/ MICHAEL W. PERRY
-----------------------------------
Michael W. Perry
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6700]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   AUTHORITY FOR COMMITTEE TO REPORT

  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I do have some unanimous consent requests 
now. I am advised that they have all been provided to the Democratic 
leadership and have their approval.
  I ask unanimous consent that the Budget Committee have until 10 p.m. 
tonight to file their report to accompany the budget resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Raider Unveiled, Airmen Fly HEXA, Turning Flowers into TiresPublished Dec. 9, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the new B-21 Raider long-range bomber rolls out for public view, Airmen get a chance to fly the HEXA, an electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicle, and the Air Force Research Lab is working toward creating a domestic supply of rubber for aircraft tires using dandelions. (Hosted by Senior Airman Saomy Sabournin)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- B-21 Raider makes public debut; will become backbone of Air Force’s bomber fleet****- Airmen fly HEXA for first time****- AFRL teams with industry to expand alternative natural rubber supply**Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



AFRL 



AFMC 



Materials and Manufacturing Directorate 



Lift HEXA 



AFwerX 



Agility Prime 



eVTOL 



NDS 



B-21 Raider 



Lloyd J. Austin 



SecDEF 



strategic bomber