alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wm. Hudson, Ex’r, v. J. J. Henderson.

(No. 1072, Op. Book No. 1, p. 816.)

Appeal from Olay County.

May 24, 1879.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 353. *Venue of suit.*The law prescribes that every suit in a justice’s court shall be commenced in the precinct in which defendant resides, except in certain specified cases, one of which is that a defendant may be sued in the county or precinct in which the contract, by its terms, is to be performed. On the trial of this case evidence was adduced, over objections by defendant on the trial of his plea to the jurisdiction, that it was a custom amongst farmers in that country, that, when a party bought grain at a particular place, the price was payable at the same place, and that, when a person contracted a debt for board at any particular place, the same was payable at the place where it was contracted. *Held error.*A rule of law can never be subverted by local custom. It would open for discussion and neighborhood proof, not the facts, but the law, and allow to each neighborhood the right to claim a distinct law of its own, thereby destroying the beauty of the law, which consists in its uniformity throughout the land. [Dewees v. Lockhart, 1 Tex. 535; Sayles’ Prac. sec. 275.]

Reversed and remanded.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert I. Lipp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated this 8th day of May, 2003

/s/ Robert I. Lipp

Robert I. Lipp
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM _____
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH _______ .
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         128,894
<SECURITIES>                                    32,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                       975
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               366,323
<PP&E>                                         194,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 667,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,837
<BONDS>                                        173,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           348
<OTHER-SE>                                     295,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   667,406
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,976
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,880)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,422
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1370 

KA 13-01198 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES L. LINDSAY, III, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID W. FOLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MAYVILLE (JOSEPH M. CALIMERI OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Chautauqua County Court (John L.

LaMancuso, A.J.), rendered June 13, 2013. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of, inter alia, reckless

endangerment in the first degree and driving while intoxicated, a

misdemeanor (2 counts). 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, reckless endangerment in the

first degree (Penal Law § 120.25) and two counts of driving while

intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]). We reject

defendant’s contention that County Court erred in denying his pro se

motion to withdraw his plea without conducting an adequate inquiry. 

The record establishes that the court afforded defendant the requisite

“reasonable opportunity to present his contentions” (People v Tinsley,

35 NY2d 926, 927; see People v Carter-Doucette, 124 AD3d 1323, 1324,

lv denied 25 NY3d 988), and properly denied the motion inasmuch as

defendant’s “claims were conclusory and unsubstantiated” (People v

Temple, 89 AD3d 644, 644, lv denied 19 NY3d 968). We also reject

defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to assign him

new counsel before making that determination. “[T]he record belies

defendant’s contention that defense counsel took a position adverse to

that of defendant in his pro se motion to withdraw the plea, and thus

there was no reason for the court to assign new counsel” (People v

Rossborough, 105 AD3d 1332, 1333, lv denied 21 NY3d 1045). 

Finally, we conclude that defendant’s sentence is not unduly 
-2- 1370 

KA 13-01198 

harsh or severe.

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Bach, Meiss & Co. v. C. A. Ginacchio.

(No. 1192, Op. Book No. 3, p. 336.)

Appeal from Harrison County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1310. *Appeal bond in justice’s court must be filed within ten days after rendition of judgment.*On appeal from justice’s to county court the appeal bond must be filed within ten days from the date of the judgment. [R. S. 163S, 1639.] This does not affect the power of the justice to grant new trials. The statute confines the power of the justice to grant new trials to the same time in which the bond is to be given. [R. S. 1622.] The justice must act upon the motion for new trial, either granting or refusing it, within ten days from the date of the judgment. The appeal bond may be filed immediately after the motion for new trial has been overruled, and within the ten days after the date of the judgment. There is nothing contradictory in the provisions of the statute cited. In this case the appeal bond having been filed more, than ten days after the date of the judgment, the motion in the county court to dismiss the appeal should have been sustained, which not having been done, the judgment of that court is reversed,' and the appeal to that court dismissed. [Note.— See this case, *post,*p. 166, a motion for rehearing having been granted, and the judgment of the court below affirmed.]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1226
SHUNDA T. FRANCIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-03-968-3) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shunda T. Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Shunda T. Francis appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Francis v. Virginia , No. CA-03-968-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
News United States Air Force
 VCSAF visits Minot AFBPublished Oct. 12, 2023
                        
                        
                        Fifth Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, N.D. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Vice Chief of Staff **Gen. David Allvin** visited **Minot Air Force Base** Oct. 11. Allvin and his team toured the installation to learn about the processes that make Minot AFB operational and to get an in-depth understanding of the base’s nuclear deterrence mission.

During the visit, Allvin met with 5th Bomb Wing and 91st Missile Wing leaders to gather insight into the only U.S. Air Force base holding two-thirds of the **nuclear triad**. Minot AFB leadership teams highlighted facilities and operations contributing directly to the success of the nation’s nuclear deterrence mission.

“The strategic importance of the work carried out here at Minot AFB cannot be overstated,” Allvin said. “As the only dual-wing nuclear capable base in the Air Force, the Airmen assigned here are responsible for two legs of our nation’s nuclear triad. It’s a responsibility that is not to be taken lightly, and one the fine Airmen here have risen to meet time and time again.”
Allvin’s visit provided an opportunity to engage directly with the Airmen responsible for mission execution, fostering a sense of unity and purpose in safeguarding the nation's security interests.

“This whole experience has been very illuminating” Allvin said. “It’s clear that our nation’s nuclear deterrence mission is in the best of hands here at Minot.”

The engagement was one of Allvin’s first visits to any Air Force base in his role as **acting chief of staff**.

“It’s an honor to be one of the first installations to host the acting chief of staff,” said **Col. Daniel Hoadley**, 5th BW commander. “His decision to visit Minot AFB really drives home the point to our Airmen that what we do here is of paramount importance to national security.”minot air force base 



VCSAF 



Distinguished Visitor 



leadership 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Gen. David Allvin 



vice chief of staff 



Minot AFB 



nuclear triad 



nuclear deterrence 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



AFGSC Related Links
        Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force visits North Dakota
            
            VCSAF spouse tours Grand Forks AFB, visits with Key Spouses
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (Second Amendment) for the period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Larry Hinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Larry K. Hinson

Larry Hinson, Chief Financial Officer
January 3, 2003



<PAGE>
News United States Air Force
 NCO retraining program revamped for FY24Published Aug. 14, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force is continuing to improve its talent management programs to provide additional opportunities to further develop and retain Airmen.

The latest program to evolve is the retraining process for Career Airmen, or those on their second or subsequential enlistments, which updates eligibility requirements for FY24.

During Phase I, which began Aug. 1, the window to apply was significantly increased to nine months, allowing more time for decision and package preparation. This window focuses on soliciting volunteers from identified overage Air Force Specialty Codes to fill requirements in career fields with known shortages.

“We are continuing to advance our talent management programs, allowing more flexibility and opportunities to keep Airmen in our ranks,” said Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services **Lt. Gen. Caroline Miller**. “This is key to keeping great talent we need and for the future force against potential challenges.”

If applications are still needed for Phase I, all eligible Airmen who are vulnerable for involuntary retraining will be formally notified in early February 2024 and are encouraged to apply for shortage AFSCs prior to implementation of Phase II, which is scheduled to run from May 1, 2024, through July 31, 2024.

Additionally, Phase II provides Career Airmen the opportunity to retrain into any AFSC manned below 90% in lieu of separation.

Earlier this year, the Air Force **announced** changes to the First Term Airmen retraining process,  and these changes now bring the same opportunities for Career Airmen.
Additional information on retraining programs, detailed eligibility criteria and application requirements can be found on the myFSS retraining page, located **here**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



retraining program 



Career Airmen 



AFSC 



talent management programs 



myFSS 



FY24 



NCO 



first term Airman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          60,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,040,987
<PP&E>                                          78,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,568,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          422,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,937
<OTHER-SE>                                     867,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,568,454
<SALES>                                         19,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,805
<CGS>                                            3,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  660,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (646,936)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (646,936)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
H. J. Res. 72 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Joint Resolution 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other 

purposes. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public 

Law 110–92 is further amended by striking the date specified 

in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. Public Law 110–92 is further amended by adding at 

the end the following new sections: 

‘‘SEC. 160. Notwithstanding any other provision of this joint 

resolution, there is appropriated for payment to the heirs at law 

of Julia Carson, late a Representative from the State of Indiana, 

$165,200. 

‘‘SEC. 161. Notwithstanding section 106, the authority to provide care and services under section 1710(e)(1)(E) of title 38, United 

States Code, shall continue in effect through September 30, 2008. 

‘‘SEC. 162. Notwithstanding section 106, the authority provided 

by section 2306(d)(3) of title 38, United States Code, shall continue 

in effect through September 30, 2008.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 100 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.100

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
Hundred Eleventh Congress and establishing the date for the counting of 
    the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by the 
                       electors in December 2008.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS.

    The first regular session of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress 
shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 6, 2009.

SEC. 2. DATE FOR COUNTING 2008 ELECTORAL VOTES IN CONGRESS.

    The meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives to be held 
in January 2009 pursuant to section 15 of title 3, United States Code, 
to count the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by 
the electors in December 2008 shall be held on January 8, 2009 (rather 
than on the date specified in the first sentence of that section).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 93 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 93

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE BURMESE FREEDOM AND 
              DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    (a) In General.--Congress approves the renewal of the import 
restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and 
Democracy Act of 2003.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--This joint resolution shall be deemed to 
be a ``renewal resolution'' for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese 
Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN COBRA FEES.

    Section 13031(j)(3)(B)(i) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2017'' and inserting ``October 7, 2017''.

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES.

    The percentage under subparagraph (C) of section 401(1) of the Tax 
Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act is increased by 0.25 percentage 
points.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 
resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution or July 26, 2008, whichever occurs first.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 93

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Latest Airman magazine hits newsstands

              - Published  Sept. 3, 2013

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The September/October issue of *Airman* magazine is now available to download and viewable through a web browser.

Our cover story, titled “The Summit,” takes you on a journey with the U.S. Air Force Seven Summits Challenge Team as they become the first group of service members to climb the tallest peaks of each mountain on every continent. But they didn't just do it for the glory, the team did it to pay tribute to their fallen comrades. Since making history, the team has shifted their focus to introducing ill or injured Airmen to the therapeutic value of mountain climbing.

Also featured in this month’s issue is “We Are Not Drones,” which tells the story of remotely piloted aircraft pilots and sensor operators as they work together to protect the troops on the ground.

Read more stories from “Around the Air Force,” and download *Airman*magazine’s September/October issue for your tablet here: 

 -  Apple version 

-  Android version 

-  Kindle version

*Airman* magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers. For the first time since the roll-out of *Airman* magazine’s tablet version, a limited interactive version is viewable in web browser format here:

-  *Airman* magazine web browser version
*Airman* Online
 

Airman magazine

#             Related Links        

-  Airman Online