alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-05-0404-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JANUARY 17, 2006

	______________________________

	BRETT THOMAS BAIRD, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT #3 OF DENTON COUNTY;

	NO. 2004-09096-C; HONORABLE DAVID D. GARCIA, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	Appellant Brett Thomas Baird has given notice of appeal from a Judgment of Community Supervision for the offense of Duty on Striking Fixture or Highway Landscaping.  The appellate court clerk received and filed the trial court clerk’s record on September 23, 2005.  The trial court reporter’s record was filed on November 15, 2005. 

	By letter dated December 28, 2005, the appellate clerk reminded counsel for appellant that appellant’s brief was due on December 15, 2005, and that neither the brief nor a motion for a further extension of time had been received.  Counsel for appellant was further advised by such letter that if no response to the letter was received by January 6, 2006, the appeal would be abated to the trial court for hearing pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b).  No response has been received. 

	Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).  Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: 

	(1) 	whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; 

	(2)	if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, then whether appellant is indigent, and if not indigent, whether counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal; 

	(3)	if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant’s present counsel should be replaced; and

	(4)	what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or, if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.

If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the court should cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney.  

	In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record.  The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental 

reporter’s record.  Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of this court no later than February 17, 2006.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
No. 87-6542.

#### Bowen *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,713
<SECURITIES>                                     4,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                       689
<INVENTORY>                                     11,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,637
<PP&E>                                           7,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,404
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,605
<SALES>                                         10,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,829
<CGS>                                            8,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (298)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: September 20, 2005
    
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderChief Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 34th EBS supports Aero India 2021Published Feb. 8, 2021
                        
                        By Senior Airman Christina Bennett
                **YELAHANKA AIR FORCE STATION, India (AFNS) --**
                More than 40 Airmen and a B-1B Lancer from Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, deployed in support of Aero India 2021, Asia's largest trade show, in Bengaluru, India, Feb. 3.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



PACAF 



Pacific Air Forces 



B-1B 



Lancer 



Ellsworth AFB 



Bengaluru 



India 



Aero India 2021 



trade show
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6290]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    RECESS UNTIL 9:15 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mrs. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, if there is no further business to 
come before the Senate, I now ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
stand in recess under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:22 p.m., recessed until 
Tuesday, May 9, 1995, at 9:15 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay S. Benet, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 31st day of October, 2003

|                                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Jay S. Benet

Jay S. Benet
Chief Financial Officer |  |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56092-56093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22937]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13351-000]


Notice Modifying Restricted Service List for a Programmatic 
Agreement for Managing Properties Included in or Eligible for Inclusion 
in the National Register of Historic Places; Marseilles Land and Water 
Company

September 3, 2010.
    On June 22, 2010, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed 
Restricted Service List for a Programmatic Agreement for Managing 
Properties Included in or Eligible for Inclusion in the National 
Register of Historic Places for the proposed Marseilles Lock and Dam 
Project No. 13351, located on the Illinois River in the town of 
Marseilles in La Salle County, Illinois. On July 7, 2010, the City of 
Marseilles filed a motion on behalf of itself and Marseilles Hydro 
Power, its development agent, requesting that the Commission include 
them on the restricted service list. On July 22, 2010, Marseilles Land 
and Water Company, the license applicant, filed an answer in opposition 
to the City's motion.
    Rule 2010 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
provides that a restricted service list should contain the names of 
each person on the service list who, in the judgment of the decisional 
authority establishing the list, is an active participant with respect 
to the phase or issue in the proceeding for which the list is 
established.\1\ The City states that it has an interest in the 
treatment of historic properties within its boundaries, and that 
Marseilles Hydro owns lands on which the proposed project would be 
constructed, as well as historic properties adjacent to the site. 
Accordingly, these entities are active participants with respect to

[[Page 56093]]

historic preservation issues and will be added to the restricted 
service list.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2010(d)(2) (2010).
    \2\ As set forth in the City's motion to intervene (filed 
February 25, 2009) and service list correction (filed February 27, 
2009), the City's designated representatives for service in these 
proceedings are William H. Pickrell, North American Hydro Holdings, 
Inc., and Donald H. Clarke, Law Offices of GKRSE (counsel for 
Marseilles Hydro Power LLC and development agent for the City of 
Marseilles).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following is an addition to the restricted service list 
established in the notice issued on June 22, 2010:

William H. Pickrell, North American Hydro Holdings, Inc., 116 State 
Street, 695 Garland Ave., Winnetka, IL 60093.
Donald H. Clarke, Law Offices of GKRSE, 1500 K Street, NW., Suite 330, 
Washington, DC 20005.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22937 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force reimburses spouse-owned small business costs accrued during PCS, PCAPublished Nov. 14, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force is now reimbursing service members up to $1,000 to re-establish spouse-owned small businesses during a permanent change of station or assignment on or after Dec. 23, 2022.
“Spouse employment is a key factor in the success of our Airmen and Guardians. Dual-income households contribute to military readiness, allowing service members to focus on their mission. Investing in our spouses’ careers is not just the right thing to do, it makes our Airmen and Guardians’ service possible,” said **Alex Wagner**, assistant secretary of the Air Force Manpower and Reserve Affairs. “This effort will also help ease the burden of relocations and facilitate the ability of our members’ spouses to return to work quickly.”
The spouse-owned small business reimbursement applies to PCS or PCA orders on or after Dec. 23, 2022; members must file a claim within 24 months of the date the PCS or PCA orders are authenticated.
This new reimbursement can be used in conjunction with the existing $1,000 reimbursement for spouses who required re-certification or re-licensing, increasing the possible total reimbursement up to $2,000.
Members are encouraged to contact their installation’s Military & Family Readiness Center with questions about eligibility and how to submit a claim. The service member’s servicing finance office will work with both the member and their spouse to verify eligibility and provide necessary documentation of qualified expenses to begin the reimbursement process.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



spouse 



PCS 



PCA 



Spouse Employment 



mfrc 



AFRC 



finance
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5090]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         PLAYING WITH REALITY WILL CATCH UP WITH THE DEMOCRATS

  (Mr. EMERSON asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. EMERSON. Mr. Speaker, I have listened to the 1-minutes this 
morning, and I do not usually make 1-minute speeches. However, I am 
perplexed by what I have heard. The Democrats have no budget plan of 
their own, none. They do not have one. They will not cooperate with any 
attempt to reform Medicare on a bipartisan basis. They stand here and 
rail about Republican cuts, cuts, cuts. There are not any cuts. To 
Democrats, restraining the rate of growth is a cut. The American public 
ought to know that. Such playing with reality will, indeed, catch up 
with them.

                          ____________________
```
#### GARWOOD G. STRIMPLE v. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

February 6, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 33.11



|     |  |                                                                      
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA
30339-2210 T 770.763.1000
|     | 
|     |  | www.assurant.corn                                                    

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2015 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of
Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all
mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting Party used the criteria set
forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed
its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment
of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period,

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                                                                                                     
|By: John Frobose
President of American Security Insurance Company
and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and
Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.
|                                                                                                                                                                     
|Date: February 8, 2016
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Support for Survivors, Privacy for Pregnancies, Psychologists in the CockpitPublished Aug. 12, 2022
                        
                        By Senior Airman Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the Integrated Response Co-Location Pilot program provides improved support for survivors of assault and harassment, AMC’s commander signs a directive providing more privacy to pregnant Airmen, and psychologists attend a new aviation training program to better serve pilots and their unit’s mission. (Hosted by Senior Airman Garrett Hess)  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:**- Department of the Air Force to launch Integrated Response Co-Location Pilot program, outlines initiatives to support sexual assault, harassment survivors****- AMC commander directs maximized privacy for pregnant Airmen****- Inaugural aviation training proves success for Air Force psychologists**USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30845 

Conference Calendar

__________________

FRANKLIN D. FRAZIER, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARMAGNE PADUA,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-2272

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), Franklin D.

Frazier, Jr., filed a complaint alleging that Orleans Parish

Assistant District Attorney, Charmagne Padua, committed the crime

of filing false public records, in violation of La. Rev. Stat.

Ann. 14:133. Frazier alleges that, in response to a habeas

petition he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Padua's brief

to the district court misquoted a state statute governing
No. 95-30845

-2-

habitual offender law and that she thus filed a false public

record. 

A complaint brought IFP may be dismissed as frivolous

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) if it has no arguable basis in

law or fact. Booker v. Koonce, 2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Section 1915(d) dismissals are reviewed for abuse of discretion. 

Moore v. Mabus, 976 F.2d 268, 270 (5th Cir. 1992). 

Frazier's attempt to have Padua somehow charged for a

violation of state law likely would have no merit even if the

statute had been misquoted. Here, there was no misstatement, as

article 61 of Louisiana's Criminal Code states:

Subject to the supervision of the attorney

general, as provided in Article 62, the district

attorney has entire charge and control of every

criminal prosecution instituted or pending in his

district, and determines whom, when, and how he shall

prosecute.

La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 61 (West 1991). Accordingly, the

district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing

Frazier's action as frivolous. 

Although Frazier has not been warned about frivolous

appeals, see Moody v. Baker, 857 F.2d 256, 258 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 488 U.S. 985 (1988), the instant appeal is plainly

frivolous. Accordingly, we warn Frazier that sanctions will be

imposed for any future frivolous appeals. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
#### Roger Lewis COULTER *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 00-281

13 S.W.3d 171

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 30, 2000

*Alvin Schay,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Roger Lewis Coulter, seeks a belated appeal and appointment of counsel for purposes of appealing the trial court’s denial of relief under Rule 37. Coulter was convicted of capital murder in the Ashley County Circuit Court and sentenced to death. We affirmed the trial court on his direct appeal. *Coulter v. State,*304 Ark. 527, 804 S.W.2d 348 (1991). On December 31, 1996, Coulter petitioned the circuit court for *718relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37. The circuit court denied his petition, on October 8, 1999.

Appellant’s counsel did not receive notice of the trial court’s denial until January 25, 2000. Appellant’s counsel promptly thereafter filed a notice of appeal and designation of record on January 27, 2000. Apparently, the notice letter had been sent to counsel’s former address at the now-defunct Arkansas Capital Resource Center.

We recently held in a case involving a death-row inmate also formerly represented by the Arkansas Capital Resource Center that lack of notice to the defendant constituted good cause to permit a belated appeal. In *Porter v. State,*339 Ark. 15 (1999), we did so recognizing the fact that modifications to Rule 37.5 should cure the inadequacies of the notice process.

Appellant’s motion for belated appeal is therefore granted, and attorney Alvin Schay is hereby appointed as counsel for appellant for purposes of this appeal.