alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 AF program provides needed supplies in fight against EbolaPublished Nov. 7, 2014
                        
                        By John Burt
                        
                        
                        Air Force Civil Engineer Center Public Affairs
                **TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Urgently needed supplies are quickly getting to those fighting the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, thanks to experts with the Air Force Civil Engineer Center's Air Force Contract Augmentation Program.
AFCAP is a rapid response contracting tool managed by AFCEC's Readiness Directorate. In fiscal year 2014, AFCAP awarded $96 million in contingency support, disaster recovery and State Department requirements. Recently, the Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA), a division of the State Department, contacted AFCAP to provide vital protective equipment for medical workers in areas hit hardest by the epidemic like Liberia, the Republic of Sierra Leone and Ghana.
"It was a commodity task order for things like safety goggles, outer gloves, examination gloves, rubber boots and head covers," said Wayland Patterson, the AFCAP chief. "OFDA contacted us to fill this urgent and compelling need; we awarded the contract the next day and had those materials in the customer's hands in just three days."
The approximately $259,000 contract included more than 183,000 medical examination gloves and over 140,000 Tyvek protective coveralls and hoods as well as tens of thousands of boots, goggles, mortuary aprons and 530,000 biohazard disposal bags.
Since the first Ebola response task order, AFCAP has worked two additional contracts, including a requirement from the World Health Organization, the public health arm of the United Nations, which underscored the human tragedy of the epidemic.
"We were asked to provide white body bags," Patterson said. "The Ebola victims were being buried in standard black body bags, but the locals considered this defilement of the dead and were digging up deceased family members to wrap the bodies in light-colored shrouds. In the process, family members were being infected. We provided more than 4,000 white body bags to stop that."
AFCAP also provided 11,000 meters of safety fencing to help safeguard medical aid workers from potential riots.
The third task order included 30- by 90-foot-long temporary medical treatment facilities, as well as infrared thermometers to enable medical personnel to instantly read body temperature at a distance without having to touch patients.
There is potential for additional task orders, Patterson said, adding he is pleased with how the AFCAP team has responded to support this international effort.
"This is an example of a contract vehicle that is responsive to National Command Authority objectives and is able to turn something quickly to meet critical timelines," Patterson said. "It feels good to know we could step up and make a difference on events on the world stage."Tyndall AFB 



Florida 



AFCEC 



civil engineer 



Ebola
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4484]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Texas [Mr. Green] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today on a note of 
sadness because this is our first full day of being in session, but on 
April 19, Oklahoma City was awakened by a bomb blast which killed both 
children and people either working or doing business in the Murrah 
Federal Building.
  Oklahoma City along with the Nation rushed to the help of a neighbor, 
including some of my constituents from Texas.
  The terrorist bomb ripped at the foundation of the Federal building 
and ripped at the fabric of our society.
  The Federal building was targeted for what are now unknown reasons, 
but at this point there is all sorts of conjecture, but whatever the 
reason is, some people were killed and injured.
  At times, the rhetoric of hate and distrust paints a picture of 
faceless bureaucrats, but the people in that building were hardworking 
people and children playing in that day-care center, and there were 
people literally waiting there for Federal Government services.
  Many Americans, not just in Oklahoma but now all over America, do not 
feel it is safe that we should allow any terrorists to rip our Nation 
apart.
  The terrorists did not affect the way Americans rush to help other 
Americans when times are tough, though.

                              {time}  1700

  When there is an earthquake or flood or any other natural disaster, 
we have volunteers running to help. This disaster was not natural, but 
neighbors still were providing a helping hand. Houston firefighters, 
along with firefighters from around the Nation, flew to Oklahoma City 
to assist in the rescue and recovery of victims from the blast. 
Southwestern Bell provided telecommunications and donation of cash 
assistance. Petrochemical companies from the Houston area provided 
assistance.
  Providing a helping hand in times of need shows that when times are 
hard for America, we come together. We come together to show that any 
terrorist group inside or outside America, that Americans will stand 
together and there is nothing that can stop them.
  If that message has done nothing else than to go forth from these 
halls of Congress, I would hope that the perpetrator and whoever is 
found guilty, that they recognize that Americans, we do come together, 
and we stand together on this tragedy.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5070]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EXTENSION OF REMARKS

  By unanimous consent, permission to revise and extend remarks was 
granted to:
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Wynn) and to include 
extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Oberstar.
  Mr. Borski.
  Ms. Norton.
  Mr. Richardson.
  Mr. Bonior.
  Mr. Levin in three instances.
  Mr. Dellums.
  Mr. Moakley.
  Mr. Stark.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Walker) and to include 
extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Cunningham.
  Mr. Solomon.
  Mr. Weldon of Florida.
  Mr. Riggs.
  Mr. Metcalf.
  Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut.
  Mr. Wicker.
  Mrs. Morella.
  Mr. Combest.
  Mr. Moorhead.
  Mr. Shaw.
  Mr. Young of Alaska.
  Mr. Portman.
  Mr. Fields of Texas.
  Mr. Bliley.
  Mr. Emerson.
  (The following Members (at the request of Ms. Jackson-Lee) and to 
include extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Bentsen.
  Mr. LaTourette.
  Ms. Velazquez.
  Mr. Pastor.
  Mr. Buyer.
  Mr. Engel in two instances.
  Mrs. Lincoln.

                          ____________________
```
#### WARREN E. WARD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with
the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sysorex Global for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the
“Report”), we, Nadir Ali, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Kevin R. Harris, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Sysorex Global, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Sysorex Global, on a consolidated basis.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This written statement is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report on Form 10-K/A.





|Date: | April 29, 2016 |  | /s/ Nadir Ali                                                                                  
|----- | -------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                |  | Name: Nadir Ali
        Title: Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)   
|      |                |  |                                                                                                
|      |                |  | /s/
Kevin Harris                                                                               
|      |                |  | Name: Kevin Harris
        Title: Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by
§906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57023-57024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 14, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Grandpoint Capital, Inc., Los Angeles, California; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Southern Arizona Community Bank, 
Tucson, Arizona.


[[Page 57024]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 14, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-23230 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
News United States Air Force
 AF acquisition chief nominee testifiesPublished Jan. 17, 2014
                        
                        By Ed Gulick
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Dr. Bill LaPlante testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee Jan. 16 during his nomination hearing to be the next assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition.
“I’ve spent over 28 years around systems technologies, acquisition programs; touching all aspects of those programs for all services,” he said. “This experience along with my time on the Defense Science Board offers firsthand impressions of Defense acquisition.”
Many of those years were spent at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md., and eight more spent as the department head for the University’s Global Engagement Department before moving to MITRE as the Missile Defense Portfolio director.
“In all that time I’ve formed impressions and opinions on the challenges of acquisition,” LaPlante said. “I come from a community that desperately wants to make a difference; a community that wants to find the game changing technology needed by the warfighter and get it into production; a community that wants to invent a clever way to do contracting so that we finish a development contract on time -- I come from a community that just wants to make a difference.”
During the hearing, LaPlante was questioned by committee members on the time it takes to develop and field weapon systems, the importance of science and technology investment and how to speed up cyber acquisition.
In his response on the importance of science and technology during a drawdown he highlighted how the U.S. military has used technological superiority as an advantage in all conflicts and that the military must continue research or risk losing the advantage.
On cyber acquisition, LaPlante stressed the service must learn what the vulnerabilities are in our weapon systems and work to reduce risks, a task that may sound simple but is actually very difficult. He said resiliency must be built into systems but the time required to design and acquire a weapons system makes that difficult.
“A problem two years ago is not a problem today, and what’s a problem today we couldn’t have imagined two years ago,” LaPlante said. “So, anything that will help us build resiliency and get the compliance part of the system to be much quicker would be very helpful.”
If confirmed, LaPlante will follow Sue Payton who left the position in April 2009. LaPlante currently serves as the principal deputy, assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition.AF senior leaders 



acquisitions
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.22    
    




  


1651 PAGE MILL ROAD

PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94304  


Phone: 650-624-9600

Fax: 650-624-7540 


August 24,
2001 


To
Dr. Leslie McEvoy: 


        Pursuant
to the terms of your offer letter dated August 18, 2000 and as an incentive toward your continued service at Corgentech, you are eligible for three (3) cash bonus
payments, each equal to a minimum amount of $3,986.75, payable on August 24, 2002, August 24, 2003 and August 24, 2004, respectively; provided,
however, if you cease to be an employee of Corgentech for any reason before any such payment date you shall not receive any further cash bonus payments. 


Very
truly yours, 



	/s/  JOHN P. MCLAUGHLIN      
 John P. McLaughlin

President and CEO, Corgentech Inc.	 	 
	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:	
 	

 
	

/s/  LESLIE MCEVOY      
Leslie McEvoy	
 	

 
	

Date: August 28, 2001	
 	

 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.22
#### THOMAS P. MAHONEY v. CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6697]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AUTHORITY FOR COMMITTEES TO MEET

                  subcommittee on international trade

  Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Subcommittee on International Trade of the Committee on Finance be 
permitted to meet on Monday, May 15, beginning at 2 p.m. in room SD-
215, to conduct a hearing on the Caribbean basin initiative.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                subcommittee on personnel and readiness

  Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Subcommittees on Personnel and Readiness of the Committee on Armed 
Services be authorized to meet at 2:30 p.m. on Monday, May 15, 1995, in 
open session, to receive testimony regarding Department of Defense 
military family housing issues in review of S. 727, the National 
Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 1996, and the future years 
defense program.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

             subcommittee on post office and civil service

  Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Subcommittee on Post Office and Civil Service, Committee on 
Governmental Affairs, be authorized to meet during the session of the 
Senate on Monday, May 15, 1995, to review Federal pension reform.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 New MH-139 Grey Wolves will go to Joint Base AndrewsPublished June 7, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected **Joint Base Andrews**, Maryland, as the fourth location to host **MH-139 Grey Wolves**.

The 25 new helicopters will replace the base’s 21 aging **UH-1N Hueys**. The additional four aircraft will allow the base to execute continuation of government operations and distinguished visitor transport mission requirements without augmenting support units.

In addition to providing updated capabilities to support missions in the National Capital Region, the Grey Wolf will increase speed, range, endurance, payload and survivability in support of the intercontinental ballistic missile mission, civil search and rescue, airlift and survival school/testing.

The manpower required to support this mission will grow from 235 personnel to approximately 310.

Basing the new helicopters at JBA was based on factors related to mission, base capacity, community support, cost and environmental considerations.

DAF is expected to complete the required environmental assessment in summer 2023 before a final decision is made.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Joint Base Andrews 



MH-139 Grey Wolves 



Aircraft 



UH-1N Hueys 



helicopter
EXHIBIT 10.177



 

	 
	
1








	





 



 

	 
	
2








	





 



 

	 
	
3








	





 



 

 

4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7217

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TAMMIE DESCHELL DIGGS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cr-00117-HEH-1)

Submitted: August 5, 2022 Decided: August 26, 2022

Before RUSHING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tammie Deschell Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7217 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tammie Deschell Diggs appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for 

compassionate release. United States v. Diggs, No. 3:16-cr-00117-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 

5, 2021). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7217 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40057

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHANE JUDE ROMERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-105-2

- - - - - - - - - -

July 21, 1998

Before KING, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shane Jude Romero appeals his sentence from his guilty-plea

conviction for carjacking. He argues that the district court

clearly erred in failing to reduce his offense level for

acceptance of responsibility. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We have

carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. We

conclude that, in light of the standard of review which accords

great deference to the sentencing court’s § 3E1.1 determination,

no error ensued. See United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 120-21
2

(5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Siebe, 58 F.3d 161, 163 (5th

Cir. 1995); United States v. Watkins, 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir.

1990).

AFFIRMED.
#### John S. Proctor v. Chas. I. Evans.

(No. 264, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 163.)

Appeal from Brazos County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 647. *Liability of an obligor who signs note to be signed by another who does not sign; evidence to explain written instrument.*Evans, the appellee, and one Wren, as partners, were jointly indebted to appellant Proctor on open account. Evans executed and delivered the note sued on in settlement of said account, and took up the account, which was receipted. The note which is sued on in this case reads, “we promise to pay,” etc. Evans pleads, and so contends, that he is not liable upon said note, because, at the date of its execution, it was understood and agreed that the note was also to be signed by Wren, and that, unless so signed, its obligations were not to be binding upon him. On the trial the court, over objections of plaintiff, permitted Evans to testify to these facts. This, it seems, was not error. Mr. Parsons, in his work on Notes and Bills, lays down the rule as follows: “ If a note be drawn with the intent that it shall be signed by several persons, and one or more of them sign it on a representation by the payee of the party to whom it is to be given, or by an understanding with him, that the others will sign it, and they do not, it is not valid against the actual signers.” [1 Pars, on N. & B. 232.] It will be noticed, however, upon examination of the authorities cited by him in support of the rule, that the cases all differ from the one we are considering in the important particular that the parties relieved against liability in those cases were all sureties or indorsers, and not parties primarily liable for a pre-existing debt. How far the rule would or should be changed to meet the case of one originally liable, and who had obtained a receipt of his original indebtedness, we do not deem it necessary to inquire or determine at this time. As stated above, the court, under the pleadings in this *351case, did not err in permitting the testimony to be intro, duced. The court, however, erred in overruling the motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

January 12, 1878.

Reversed and remanded.