alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1

                                                      Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                      45 South Seventh Street
                                                      Minneapolis, MN 55402-2800
                                                      Tel 612 332 1111
     February 1, 2000

     Hutchinson Technology Incorporated

     Re: Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended December 26, 1999

     Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling
     for a letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has
     been a change in accounting principle or practice.

     We have been informed that, as of September 27, 1999, the Company changed
     from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of accounting for inventories to
     the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. According to the management of the
     Company, this change was made due to permanent and significant declines in
     inventory conversion costs due to technological advances that are
     significantly affecting inventory costs through productivity gains.
     Additionally, substantially all of the Company's peer group utilizes the
     FIFO method.

     A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for
     determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable
     alternative principles has not been established by the accounting
     profession. Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the
     change in accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a
     preferable method. However, we have reviewed the pertinent factors,
     including those related to financial reporting, in this particular case on
     a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is based on our
     determination made in this manner.

     We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is
     to an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the
     reasons stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also
     preferable under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at
     this opinion, we have relied on the business judgment and business planning
     of your management.

     We have not audited the application of this change to the financial
     statements of any period subsequent to September 26, 1999. Further, we have
     not audited and do not express any opinion with respect to your financial
     statements for the period ended December 26, 1999.

     Very truly yours,
     /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Exhibit 31.1Certification
of Officer of the Depositor





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas A. Davidson,
President and Chief Executive Officer of CEF Equipment Holding, L.L.C., certify that:



1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered
by this report on Form 10-K of GE Equipment Transportation LLC, Series 2011-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and



5.All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications
above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.





March 26, 2012

/s/ Thomas A. Davidson

Name: Thomas A. Davidson

Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer
CEF Equipment Holding, L.L.C.
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 (the Sale and
Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2011-2, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2012 and ending on February 28, 2013 and of the Servicers performance
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout
such period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Capitalized terms used in
this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers Certificate this 24th day of May, 2013.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. Reedy
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
### OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS AUSTIN

‘” I balre 

### raoentl*ke~s& Rationing Board a

### member or t&l Honorable Mohsrd 7. Stovall. Diatrfot Attorney Ylopaaaa, Toxae Doas Dirt oplalon Ho. o-53 Rar U&the

t Attorney of d a8 a 

### momber of
en6 

### lnfornmtfon as 

### to of a member of the board8 and war oompriarions are t 

### GOTthe auratic)n of the war 88 

### to the elrlllan population as 088, and tho members 

### aot purely s. In many lnstanoes they aro 

### rust and eunolwnanta 

### and tbo dutior 

### mb rr~panrtbllitl~a required a)?8 suoh that Our COOatitwdOn 

### pr0vsate State orrloere from aooeptlng same*

## 602

,,a. Riohard T. Stovall Fags 2.

Unquestfmibly the lsw should bo llbsral.lp 

### oon- &rued andtharabp permit thosa xho hold officlsl poaltions toreader suoh aid and asrlatonoo to the jiovernmoot a8 is ~onallrtent wolthandwhioh do not violets the **hIL9titUtiOA** ma 

### lawa of 

### the hod.

Wefeel ooniidont after you havo asaertalaed the dutlea end rssponeibilitlra that will be rsqulrad of you aa 

### a mmbsrof the =prioe panel of the County Rationing Board” you 04~drtsrsinr for yowceolf whether came **doe6** in anyweg eontllot with the Cohstltutlon.

Until and ualees wehare more deiinlts informa**tlOA** relative to suoh 

### position and work to be performed thare

### ond@rwe oould Dot 

### &iv6 aAy **drtlnits** 

### reply. Youlw very mllf, ATl’GRW G??N???AL 37‘RX49 A? 

## -3- 9Y Gso. 9, Barous A68b.3 tant

**WNNIRCE**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,687,002
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,969,183
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,410,175
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,693,219
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,694,091
<LOANS>                                     79,514,057
<ALLOWANCE>                                    852,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,857,577
<DEPOSITS>                                  96,730,053
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,259,145
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,547,093
<LONG-TERM>                                    330,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,759
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,928,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             109,857,577
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,796,049
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              310,006
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                15,067
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,121,122
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             995,961
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,125,161
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                978,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                303,459
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     303,459
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   189,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.32
<LOANS-NON>                                    443,903
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                12,750
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                879,038
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               854,482
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   23,966
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,500
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              852,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           852,016
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 67 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, February 
16, 2007, or Saturday, February 17, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant 
to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 

              

2007, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate 
recesses or adjourns on any day from Saturday, February 17, 2007, 
through Saturday, February 24, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, February 26, 2007, or 
such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 
of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may

              

 designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of American Business Financial Services, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and the three months then ended and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       8,812,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,430,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                   956,982
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,233,217
<PP&E>                                       2,503,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 925,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,975,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,135,227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,353
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,109,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,975,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,584,110
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,806,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               300,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,041,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,777,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                   622,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,155,641
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,155,641
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       47
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6908-S6909]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

  At 1;02 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Mr. Hays, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
passed the following bill, with an amendment, in which it requests the 
concurrence of the Senate:

       S. 219. An act to ensure economy and efficiency of Federal 
     Government operations by establishing a moratorium on 
     regulatory rulemaking actions, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the House has passed the following 
bill, with amendments, in which it requests the concurrence of the 
Senate:

       S. 4. An act to grant the power to the President to reduce 
     budget authority.

  The message further announced that pursuant to the provisions of 22 
United States Code 276d, the Speaker appoints the following Members as 
members of the United States delegation to attend the meeting of the 
Canada-United States Interparliamentary Group on the part of the House: 
Mr. Manzullo, Chairman, Mr. Latham, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Dunn, Mr. Zimmer, 
Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Johnston of Florida, Mr. 
de la Garza, Mr. Gibbons, Ms. Slaughter, and Mr. McNulty.
[[Page S6909]]

                                                                    ____
  At 6:10 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Ms. Goetz, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
the following bill, in which it requests the concurrence of the Senate:

       H.R. 961. An act to amend the Federal Water Pollution 
     Control Act.
                                                                    ____

  At 8:38 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Ms. Goetz, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House 
agrees to the report of the committee on conference on the disagreeing 
votes of the two Houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill 
(H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for additional 
disaster assistance and making rescissions for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 11, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-31180

Summary Calendar

 

EARNEST L. SMITH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF LOUISIANA, Department of Public Safety and

Corrections, Board of Parole; VERDEGRA SCOTT; E. PEGGY 

LANDRY; GETIHEN MCCASTLE; MARLON EVERY, Parole Officer,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-MC-2141-B

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Earnest L. Smith, Louisiana prisoner # 1077412, appeals from

the district court’s denial of his motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Smith presents

no argument that the district court erred in denying his IFP

motion and, consequently, has waived any challenge to the

district court’s IFP ruling. See Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d
No. 02-31180

-2-

607, 612-13 (5th Cir. 1999). Smith’s failure to brief the denial

of IFP status is the same as if he had not appealed the judgment. 

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is without arguable

merit and is hereby DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Smith’s request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED

as unnecessary. To the extent he seeks IFP status in this court,

this court may authorize Smith to proceed IFP on appeal only if

he is economically eligible and his appeal is not frivolous. 

Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.

1986). Because the appeal is frivolous, IFP is DENIED.

COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS

FRIVOLOUS.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

September 20, 2013
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harry M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Harry M. Neer
--------------------------------------
Harry M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2003


<PAGE>