alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL |  

  |
|-------------------------|----------------|

 

 

                

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of  November 1, 2011  by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland Loan Services, a Division of  PNC Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Trust Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C5  **(WFRBS 2011-C5)**

 

                

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

Certified by:  /s/  Adam Singer                                                                                Date:  March 5, 2015

       Adam Singer, Managing Director
ex10-01.htm


EXHIBIT 10.01







COMPENSATION AGREEMENT







This Compensation Agreement is dated as of October 22, 2014 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Marc J. Ross (the “Consultant”).







WHEREAS, the Company has requested the Consultant to provide the Company with certain SEC-related legal services in connection with its business (the “Services”) and the Consultant has agreed to provide the Company with the Services; and







WHEREAS, the Company wishes to compensate the Consultant with shares of its common stock for such Services through the issuance of such number of shares of common stock to Consultant that Consultant shall receive net proceeds from the sale of those shares in an amount of $5,000 per month, starting September 1, 2014, not to exceed an aggregate amount of 150,000 shares of common stock (the “Shares”).







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter stated, it is agreed as follows:







1.           The Company shall issue up to 150,000 Shares to the Consultant as consideration for the Services to be rendered.  The Company shall register all 150,000 Shares on a Form S-8 under this Compensation Agreement.  The registration statement shall be filed promptly following the execution of this Compensation Agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Compensation Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the date first above written.







 


CONSULTANT









By:           /s/ MARC J. ROSS


Marc J. Ross







 


The Company:







INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.









By:           /s/ Dr. Bassam Damaj


President and Chief Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force completes USSPACECOM draft environmental assessmentPublished July 13, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Forcehas completed the draft environmental assessment of the preferred alternative and other five reasonable alternatives for **U.S. Space Command**headquarters asrequired by the National Environmental Policy Act, or **NEPA**. The draft document was made available, July 13, for a 30-day public comment period in accordance with the NEPA process.
The final environmental assessment will take into account comments received for the DAF to consider before making a final basing decision for the command's headquarters. As recommended by the Department of Defense Inspector General and directed by the Secretary of Defense, the DAF will also review concerns regarding full operational capability for U.S. Space Command headquarters, as well as review the DAF’s analysis criteria for “childcare,” “housing affordability,” and “access to military/veteran support” to verify that identification of the preferred alternative was supported.Once the NEPA process is complete, the Secretary of the Air Force will select a location for U.S. Space Command headquarters.The draft environmental assessment, along with information about how to submit a comment, is available**here**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



U.S. Space Command 



USSPACECOM 



draft environmental assessment 



preferred alternative 



National Environmental Policy Act 



NEPA 



basing decision 



childcare 



housing 



support 



readiness
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,487-03

EX PARTE CLINTON MANNING DAVIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 22,163-A IN THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT 

FROM POLK COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

CONCURRING OPINION

In 2013, Applicant, Clinton Manning Davis, pled guilty and was convicted of 

indecency with a child and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. In 2020, Applicant

filed this application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, alleging his plea 

was involuntary because counsel told him he would receive a sixty-year sentence if he did 

not take the State’s plea offer of fifteen years. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Today, the Court remands this application to the trial court to further develop the 

record. I agree this application should be remanded, and so I join the Court’s order doing 

so. But I write separately, as I have previously, to address my thoughts concerning the 

doctrine of laches and its possible application to this case. See Ex parte Smith, 444 S.W.3d 

661 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to sua sponte consider 
DAVIS — 2

the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Sepeda, No. WR-92,711-01, 2021 WL 2450089 (Tex. 

Crim. App. June 16, 2021) (per curiam) (not designated for publication) (Yeary, J., 

concurring) (reviewing Ex parte Smith’s holding and the principles that justify a trial 

court’s sua sponte authority to consider laches).

The doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this one. Applicant’s 

trial occurred in 2013, but this application was not filed until almost six and a half years 

later.1 In addition, the record is silent with regard to circumstances that may excuse 

Applicant’s delay.

Consistent with this Court’s precedent, the trial court may, sua sponte, give 

Applicant the opportunity to explain the reasons for the delay. It may also give the State 

and/or former counsel for Applicant an opportunity to state whether Applicant’s delay has 

caused any prejudice to their ability to defend against Applicant’s claims. And ultimately, 

the trial court may include findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the doctrine 

of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order.

With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED: September 29, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the diminished 

memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of the State's evidence, both of which 

may often be said to occur beyond five years after a conviction becomes final.” Ex parte Perez, 

398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe, 132 S.W.3d 434, 437–39 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)).
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: $10K Reserve Bonus, CCAF Operational Pause, Sentinel DeploymentPublished April 14, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, prior-service enlisted Airmen can get a $10,000 signing bonus if they join the Reserves, the Community College of the Air Force is close to completing their system upgrade for better service, and the new Sentinel ICBM is poised to replace the aging Minuteman III. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.National Environmental Policy Act 



Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Weapon System 



ICBM 



Air Force Reserve Command 



recruiting 



CCAF 



Air University 



Community College of the Air Force 



students 



graduation Related Links
        Reserve Command announces $10K bonus for prior-service enlisted Airmen
            
            CCAF operational pause update
            
            Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Sentinel Deployment and Minuteman III Decommissioning and Disposal Published
EX-35.1
(logo) Bank of America

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION

Re: Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
    Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C3

In connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a
review of the Servicing activities, for the period ending December 31, 2011 and
of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October
1, 2011 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, National Association has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects
throughout the aforementioned period.

Bank of America, National Association

/s/ Janice M. Smith
Janice M. Smith
Managing Director

/s/ H. Michael Lumadue
H. Michael Lumadue
Director
News United States Air Force
 DAF publishes Comprehensive Strategy for the Space ForcePublished Oct. 13, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Department of the Air Force’s Report to Congressional Committees, Comprehensive Strategy for the Space Force, dated August 2023, was published on the **SpaceForce.mil** Space Force Policy **page** for public review Oct. 13. A link to the document is available **here**.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



space force 



policy 



comprehensive strategy 



report 



One Team One Fight
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 384
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

                          [Report No. 110-184]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2007

      Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

                           September 24, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That subsection (b) of section 
3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the 
dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu 
thereof $9,815,000,000,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Deborah M. Spriggs,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 384

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 43

                          [Report No. 110-184]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 24, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,031
<SECURITIES>                                     8,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                       420
<INVENTORY>                                     11,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,148
<PP&E>                                          24,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,387
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,622
<SALES>                                         14,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,412
<CGS>                                            8,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                       717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,170
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### NORMANDY BEACH IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION v. COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Wm. Nickel v. J. & E. Greenwold.

(No. 791, Op. Book No. 3, p. 420.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

June 9, 1880.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 70. *Lien; waiver of, a question of intention.*Whether a lien is waived or not, is generally a question of intention. When it has once attached, the taking of a negotiable security for the debt does not of itself operate as a release of the lien. [Pope v. Graham, 44 Tex. 196.]

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 SecAF announces incentive pay for nuclear career fieldsPublished Sept. 15, 2014
                        
                        By Capt. Chris Sukach
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Office
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James announced assignment incentive pay and special duty assignment pay for officers and enlisted members assigned to certain career fields in the nuclear enterprise, Sept. 15.
As part of the Air Force’s continued commitment to the nuclear mission, both officers and enlisted members serving in certain career fields in the nuclear enterprise will receive up to $300 per month. 
“People assigned to these demanding and exclusive nuclear positions take on an extraordinary amount of responsibility, workload and inspection rigor for the world’s most lethal weapons,” James said. “The nuclear mission is our number one mission and we’re going to compensate our Airmen accordingly.”
The assignment incentive pay is open to officers assigned to and working in critical nuclear billets, with primary duty in the missile fields.
Special duty assignment pay will apply to certain enlisted career fields in the nuclear enterprise with details to come soon.
The incentive pays are effective Oct. 1, 2014.incentive pay 



special duty 



SecAF 



Deborah Lee James 



nuclear enterprise
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [STB Docket No. CU 159]

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 1, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott Decker 202-245-0330. Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.

By the Board, William F. Huneke, Director, Office of Economics.

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Montana Rail Link, Inc., and Wisconsin Central Ltd., Joint Petition For Rulemaking With Respect To 49 CFR Part 1201,*                         8 I.C.C. 2d 625 (1992) raised the revenue classification level for Class I railroads from $50 million (1978 dollars) to $250 million (1991 dollars), effective for the reporting year beginning January 1, 1992. The Class II threshold was also raised from $10 million (1978 dollars) to $20 million (1991 dollars).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2010-23463 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
News United States Air Force
 CSAF 23 Letter to AirmenPublished Nov. 6, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Newly appointed Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. David W. Allvin** released his first letter to Airmen.

In the letter, Allvin expresses humility, pride, and a sense of urgency in assuming the role and lays out the need for follow-through on key readiness and innovation initiatives while also acknowledging the challenges faced by the Air Force.

The letter serves as a rallying call for Airmen to continue their exceptional service and adapt to the evolving demands of national security.

To read the full letter, click **here**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Letter to Airmen 



CSAF23 



Gen. David W. Allvin 



Teamwork 



One Team One Fight 



ACOL 



NDS 



airpower 



resilience 



follow through 



Operational Imperatives 



Force Presentation 



force generation 



Force Design 



org structure 



training transformation 



innovative talent 



all-axis-leadership Related Links
        CSAF23 Letter to Airmen
exv4w1



 



Exhibit 4.1



Second Amendment to Rights Agreement



     This Second Amendment to Rights Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is
made as of December _5_, 2003, by and between First Financial Bancorp., an Ohio
corporation (the “Company”), and First Financial Bank, National Association
(formerly known as The First National Bank of Southwestern Ohio) (the “Rights
Agent”).


     Whereas, the Company and the Rights Agent entered into a Rights Agreement
dated as of November 23, 1993, which Rights Agreement was subsequently amended
by the Company and the Rights Agent as of May 1, 1998 (as amended, the
“Agreement”); and


     Whereas, as permitted by Section 26 of the Agreement, the Company and the
Rights Agent wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the rights set
forth therein for an additional period of five years.


     Now, Therefore, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements set
forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as
follows:


     Section 1. Section 1(p) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated
in full to read as follows:


     “Final Expiration Date” shall mean the close of business on December 6,
2008.”


     Section 2. The amendment set forth in Section 1 above shall be effective
upon the close of business on December _5_, 2003.


     Section 3. Except for the amendments to the Agreement contained in this
Second Amendment, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.


     In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment
to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 
	Attest:	 	
First Financial Bancorp.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	
/s/ Janie McCauley
	 	By:
	 	/s/ C. Douglas Lefferson
	 	 	


	 	 	 	

	Name:	 	
Janie McCauley
	 	Name:
	 	C. Douglas Lefferson
	 	 	


	 	 	 	

	Title:	 	
Secretary


	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	





	 	 	 
	Attest:	 	
First Financial Bank, National Association






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	
/s/ Terri J. Ziepfel
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Mark W. Immelt
	 	 	


	 	 	 	

	Name:	 	
Terri J. Ziepfel
	 	Name:
	 	Mark W. Immelt
	 	 	


	 	 	 	

	Title:	 	
Secretary
	 	Title:
	 	President & Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	


	 	 	 	




CinLibrary/1348902.2