alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of China
Cable and  Communication,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the quarter ended June 30,
2005, I, Raymond  Ying-Wai  Kwan,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to the  best  of the
undersigned knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: August 17, 2005                   /s/ Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                        --------------------------
                                        Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                        Chief Executive Officer
(logo)pwc

 

 

**Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Tothe Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Reporton Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that MidlandLoan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association(“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*Loan Management System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company hasdetermined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it withrespect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement's assertion based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities thatcomprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to thePlatform, and determining whether the Company processed those selectedtransactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selectedtransactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during theperiod covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detectnoncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequentto our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that Midland complied with theaforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T:(816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# DATES:

*Date and Time:*                         The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on September 8, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - August 12, 2010.

### B. New Business 

    - Merger of the Louisiana Ag Credit ACA, and Subsidiaries with Southern AgCredit, ACA, and Subsidiaries.
    - Fall 2010 Abstract of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions and Fall 2010 Regulatory Performance Plan.
    - Farm Credit Administration Revised FY 2011 and Proposed FY 2012 Budget.

## Closed Session* 

### Reports 

    - OSMO Quarterly Report.

*Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).

Dated: August 27, 2010. 

Roland E. Smith, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-21859 Filed 8-27-10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: First
    Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, QBE
    FIRST Insurance Agency, Inc. as Sub-Contractor for SunTrust Mortgage,
    Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. as Servicer, SunTrust Mortgage,
    Inc. as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
    Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   June 27, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 61 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 61

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

                                Received

            October 2 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

         Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States flag flown 
 over the United States Capitol should be lowered to half-mast one day 
 each month in honor of the brave men and women from the United States 
            who have lost their lives in military conflicts.

Whereas more than 1,000,000 brave men and women from the United States have died 
        in military conflicts from the time of the Revolutionary War through 
        Operation Iraqi Freedom;
Whereas the people of the United States mourn the loss of the brave men and 
        women who have given their lives for this country;
Whereas the United States has not forgotten the sacrifices that brave men and 
        women have made to protect our Nation and our freedom; and
Whereas paying tribute to the brave men and women from the United States who 
        gave their lives for this Nation demonstrates the spirit of patriotism 
        that is the foundation of our great country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the United States flag flown 
over the United States Capitol should be lowered to half-mast one day 
each month in honor of the brave men and women from the United States 
who have lost their lives in military conflicts.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Scott & Sparrow v. John A. Watts.

(No. 1111, Op. Book No. 3, p. 447.)

Error from Karnes County.

January 26, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 88. *Service of citation by military officer.*A defendant was served with citation by a lieutenant of state troops, and upon such service judgment by default was rendered. *Held,*that the officer had’ no authority to serve civil process, and the service being a nullity, the judgment by default was set aside.

§89. *Defective citation.*A citation which cited the defendant to appear in the year 187, cited him to appear at an impossible date, and was held to be fatally defective, and a judgment by default rendered thereon was set aside.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 11
                           GOLD CAPITAL CORPORATION
                            EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-QSB


Computation of Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
Used in Earnings Per Share Calculations
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995

                          Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                            September 30,         September 30,
                            1996      1995        1996       1995
Shares issued at
beginning of period     5,042,514  4,819,698    5,042,514 2,026,098

Weighted average shares-

Issued in exchange
for legal work                  0          0            0    14,286

Issued in conversion of
Royalstar advances        234,558          0       78,769         0

Issued for cash                 0     37,500            0 1,252,374

Total weighted average
shares outstanding      5,277,072  4,857,198    5,121,283 3,254,186


Fully diluted computation not made as effect would be antidilutive
in all periods.
News United States Air Force
 DOD officials order disability board results reviewPublished Dec. 9, 2013
                        
                        By Janis El Shabazz
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Some Airmen who met a medical or physical disability evaluation board between Sept. 11, 2001 and April 30, 2012 prior to separating from the Air Force may be eligible for re-evaluation, Air Force Personnel Center officials said.
When defense officials learned some diagnoses had been changed during board processing between 2001 and 2012, the secretary of defense called for a department-wide review of mental health diagnoses for members who met evaluation boards between the affected dates.
The Air Force review identified 250 eligible Airmen whose mental health diagnoses changed during the disability evaluation process. A mass mail-out effort to ensure those Airmen were aware of the opportunity to be re-evaluated elicited 31 responses.
To ensure all eligible Airmen receive and respond to the notification letter, the under secretary of defense has requested a second mailing be initiated by Dec. 31, with a required media engagement to precede the mail out.
Service members who have received a notification letter are encouraged to respond as stated in the letter. For information concerning the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review, go to the PDBR website at http://www.health.mil/PDBR. or email PDBR at PDBRPA@afncr.af.mil.Mental health 



PTSD 



medical board 



review 



personnel
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Patrick White, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2004

| /s/ Patrick White                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                |
| Patrick White        Principal Executive Officer and        Acting Principal Financial Officer |
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGI ES LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. , NBA MEDIA VENTURES, MERCURY RA DIO ARTS, INC., DBA GLENN BECK PROGRAM, INC., GBTV, LLC, PREMIERE RADIO NETWO RKS INC., TURNER SPORTS INTERACTIVE, INC., TURNER DIGITAL BASKETBALL SERVICES, INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________
2016

- 2604

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico in No s . 1:10

- cv

- 00433

- JB

- SCY, 1:12

- cv

- 01309

- JB

- SCY, 1:13

- cv

- 00636

- JB

- SCY, 1:13

- cv

01153

- JB

- SCY, Judge James O. Browning.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
M ICHAEL W. S HORE , Shore Chan DePumpo LLP, Da llas, TX, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by A LFONSO C HAN , R USSELL J. D E P ALMA , C HRISTOPHER L IIMATAINEN E VANS , A RI R AFILSON

.D AVID B. W EAVER , Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, a rgued for all defendants

- appellees. Defendants -appellees NBA Media Ventures, Turner Sports Interactive, Inc., Turner Digital Basketball Services, Inc. also represented by J EFFREY T A -H WA H AN , Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin, TX; H ILARY L. P RESTON , New York, NY.

A LAN E RNST L ITTMANN , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum, LLP, Chicago, IL, for d efendantsappellees MLB Advanced Media, L.P., Mercury Radio Arts, Inc., GBTV, LLC, Premier e Radio Networks Inc. Defendants -appellees Mercury Radio Arts, Inc., GBTV, LLC, Premier e Radio Networks Inc. also represented by E LEANOR M. L ACKMAN , Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP, New York, NY.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URI AM (N EWMAN , D YK , and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           4,009
<SECURITIES>                                     4,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       517
<INVENTORY>                                     10,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,094
<PP&E>                                          28,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,511)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,086
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,829
<SALES>                                         10,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,188
<CGS>                                            9,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   517
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1226

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RNA CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

in case no. 1:08-CV-565, Judge Thomas M. Rose.

ORDER

RNA Corporation submits correspondence informing the court that it will not

participate in this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The caption is revised to reflect that RNA Corporation is not an appellee.

FOR THE COURT

APR 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Peter M. Lancaster, Esq.

Frederic A. Mendelsohn, Esq.

s17

APR 0 9 2009

dUltbriLY

CLERK
EX-34.3


(logo) McGladrey




McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




18401 Von Karman Avenue, 5th Floor


Irvine, California 92612


O 949.255.6600  F 949.255.5091


www.mcgladrey.com






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






To the Board of Directors


Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC






We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying


Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing


Criteria (Management's Assertion), Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC (the Company)


complied with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) of the


Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the


Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation


AB reporting (the "Platform"),including only those asset-backed securities


transactions defined below, as of and for the period from the date the


contractual obligation began through December 31, 2011, excluding the following


criteria set forth in items 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii),


1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), 1122(d)(4)(i-vi) and 1122(d)(4)(viii-xv), which management


has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company


with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies


the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting


the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the


servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's


assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on


our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards


established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as


adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,


accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's


activities related to the Platform and other procedures as we considered


necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected


servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this


report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our


opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the


Company's compliance with the servicing criteria or its contractual


obligations.




In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the


aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period from the


date the contractual obligation began through the year ended December 31, 2011,


for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




Irvine, California


March 9, 2012






Member of the RSM International network of independent accounting, tax and


consulting firms.