alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 494 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 494

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the types of 
          livestock for which bonus depreciation is available.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2013

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the types of 
          livestock for which bonus depreciation is available.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF LIVESTOCK AVAILABLE FOR BONUS DEPRECIATION.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 168(k)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new clause:
                            ``(v) Dairy producing calves and cows.--In 
                        the case of any dairy producing calf or cow, 
                        subparagraph (A) shall be applied without 
                        regard to clause (ii) thereof.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2012, in taxable 
years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,630)
<INVENTORY>                                    172,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               346,105
<PP&E>                                          10,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,933)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,257,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,744,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,769,202
<OTHER-SE>                                (24,258,937)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,257,478
<SALES>                                        198,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,575
<CGS>                                           34,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  239,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,108,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,175,861)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,175,997)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,175,997)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)


</TABLE>
#### Frank Stewart v. Sam’l C. Arlege.

(No. 35, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 169.)

Error from Houston County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 656. *Judgment by default; incomplete service.*Judgment by default was rendered on the 23d day of November, 1873. The citation upon which the judgment was rendered issued on the 31st of May, 1873, and commanded the defendant to appear ‘ ‘ on the third Monday in March next,” which would be March, 1874 The defendant did *361not appear at the November term o£ said court, and judgment final was rendered against him by default. A party upon whom defective process has been served may) upon writ of error, obtain the reversal of the judgment rendered by default in the suit. [Frosch v. Schlumpf, 2 Tex. 422; Burleson v. Henderson, 4 Tex. 49; Norvell v. Garthwaite, 25 Tex. 583; Covington v. Burleson, 28 Tex. 368; Neill v. Brown, 11 Tex. 17; Violand v. Saxel, 31 Tex. 283 ]

January 16, 1878.

Eeverscd and remanded.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 100 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session 

of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress and establishing 

the date for the counting of the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by the electors in December 

2008. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HJ 100 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF ONE HUNDRED ELEV2 ENTH CONGRESS. 

3 The first regular session of the One Hundred Elev4 enth Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 

5 6, 2009. 

6 SEC. 2. DATE FOR COUNTING 2008 ELECTORAL VOTES IN 

7 CONGRESS. 

8 The meeting of the Senate and House of Representa9 tives to be held in January 2009 pursuant to section 15 

10 of title 3, United States Code, to count the electoral votes 

11 for President and Vice President cast by the electors in 

12 December 2008 shall be held on January 8, 2009 (rather 

13 than on the date specified in the first sentence of that 

14 section). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 100 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Appointing the day for the convening of the first 

cast by the electors in December 2008. electoral votes for President and Vice President and establishing the date for the counting of the session of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress
EXHIBIT 35.3


Agency & Trust


388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor


New York, NY 10013


OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE







I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N. A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2011 between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (the “Agreement”), the following:


1. A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator for the period ending December 31, 2012 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the period ending December 31, 2012, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.


This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity.


Date: March 11, 2013




Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0355

________________________________________________________________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. COLE MICHAEL JACOB ,

Defendant and Appellant . **ORDER**

Pursuant to Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until October 11, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2024

09/11/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0355
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-63935) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2003
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables
Trust 2011-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 28, 2013





| | By: | /s/ Min Sok Randy Park                                                                                                 
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: President and Secretary

(senior officer in charge of securitization
of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>			5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>			SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                          5,667,420
<SECURITIES>			0
<RECEIVABLES>			1,399,248
<ALLOWANCES>			71,103
<INVENTORY>			0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>		0
<PP&E>                          54,130,370
<DEPRECIATION>			11,300,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			55,094,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		0
<BONDS>                         51,000,000
<COMMON>			0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>			0
<OTHER-SE>			3,141,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	55,094,864
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>		8,900,758
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,732,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>		1,591,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		3,050,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>			0
<INCOME-TAX>			0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		0
<DISCONTINUED>			0
<EXTRAORDINARY>			0
<CHANGES>			0
<NET-INCOME>			1,380,792
<EPS-PRIMARY>			298.79
<EPS-DILUTED>			298.79
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6645]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 ALASKA POWER ADMINISTRATION ASSET SALE AND TERMINATION ACT--MOTION TO 
                                PROCEED

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, it will be my intention momentarily to move 
to proceed to consideration of S. 395, the Alaska Power Administration 
bill. I understand there are objections to proceeding to the bill at 
this time. Therefore, Members should be aware that rollcall votes are 
possible this morning and throughout the day.
  Mr. President, I move to proceed to consideration of S. 395, Calendar 
111, the Alaska Power Administration bill.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Brown). The question is on the motion. Is 
there objection?
  Mrs. MURRAY. I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard. The Senator from 
Washington is recognized.
  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, I do object to moving to this bill at 
this time, although I understand the underlying bill has much in it 
that is important. I do not want to keep us from moving toward that. 
Section 2 of this bill is extremely important, critical. It has been 
under the jurisdiction of the Banking Committee for the last several 
years that I know of that I have been here. It has not been debated in 
that committee and I believe it should go back to that committee to be 
looked at.
  It is an extremely important section that allows the lifting of the 
ban on oil for Alaska exports. It has tremendous impact to the west 
coast, and particularly to my State of Washington, as well as Oregon 
and California, and is a measure that should see much more light of 
day, particularly in the Banking Committee, before it is debated on 
this floor.
  Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. KYL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. KYL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to proceed as in 
morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# SNCOA graduates first Space Force members

              - Published  Oct. 4, 2020
              -                             By 2nd Lt. Katie DuBois                                                    
              - Air University Public Affairs

**MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --  **
**Air University**'s Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy recently graduated its first **Space Force** members Sept. 25.Master Sgt. Jeffrey Roberts and Master Sgt. Robert Yarnes are only two of the more than 2,000 organic space operators in officer and enlisted Air Force specialty codes who began transferring Sept. 1, but the first from the SNCOA. Roberts is currently the superintendent of the National Security Space Institute at Peterson-Schriever Garrison, Colorado and Yarnes is the current division manager at Joint Task Force–Space Defense at**Schriever Air Force Base**, Colorado.Roberts has always dreamed of supporting operations in space. “Space was always the original intent for joining the military,” Roberts said. “When asked to join the United States Space Force, my decision was based on continuing the mission and to be part of something fantastic at the same time. It is a fresh start where the influence of a few will result in the betterment of the many.”Yarnes on the other hand was rather surprised about the opportunity. “I did not even imagine that there would be a U.S. Space Force, much less that I would be one of the first few thousand members,” Yarnes said. “It is an incredible honor to help stand up the new service and work alongside so many highly qualified professionals. I do feel truly blessed that I get to be a part of it.”SNCOA aims to inspire senior enlisted leader intellectual, emotional and strategic growth while also developing cutting-edge, joint warfighters to dominate in any battle domain — including space.“The SNCOA does a great job preparing you to lead enlisted, communicate with leadership and to develop military attributes. These are the learning outcomes of the SNCOA and it is important to all SNCOs regardless of which branch of service you may be in,” Roberts said. “As a SNCO, you need to strive for becoming part of an effective, agile and lethal organization. As part of the United States Space Force, we have to develop Space Professionals who can adapt to unknown challenges and act decisively while effectively communicating intent to both our adversaries and allies.”“The biggest concept that was hit every day since the first of class: leaders need to foster innovation and agility in order to enhance lethality,” Yarnes said. “This will be critical moving forward for the Space Force, as operating in such a complex domain such as space demands that the U.S. needs to bring to bear lethal and credible reasons to deter potential adversaries from attacking us in space.”The Space Force, which was established December 20, 2019, will have more than 6,000 uniformed active duty members in organic and common AFSCs when fully manned.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAETCAir Education and Training CommandSNCOAspace forceSenior Noncommissioned Officer AcademyAir University
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 47 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Medal of 

Honor Day to celebrate and honor the recipients of the 

Medal of Honor. 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest award that can 

be bestowed to a member of the Armed Forces for valor 

in action against an enemy force; 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is awarded by the President, in 

the name of the Congress, to members of the Armed 

Forces who have distinguished themselves 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HCON 47 RDS 

conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of 

their lives above and beyond the call of duty; 

Whereas the United States will forever be in debt to the recipients of the Medal of Honor for their bravery and sacrifice in times of war or other armed conflict; 

Whereas the Medal of Honor was first awarded on March 25, 

1863, during the Civil War; 

Whereas, of the millions of men and women who have served 

in the Armed Forces in war, military operations, or other 

armed conflicts, only 3,443 members have thus far been 

awarded the Medal of Honor; 

Whereas 111 Medal of Honor recipients are still living as of 

January 1, 2007; 

Whereas it is appropriate to commemorate and honor the recipients of the Medal of Honor and to recognize their 

bravery and sacrifice for the United States; 

Whereas the designation of a National Medal of Honor Day 

would raise the awareness of the American people regarding the significance and meaning of the Medal of Honor 

and help focus the efforts of national, State, and local organizations striving to foster public appreciation and recognition of Medal of Honor recipients; and 

Whereas March 25 would be an appropriate date to observe 

National Medal of Honor Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the heroism and sacrifice of 

4 Medal of Honor recipients for the United States; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HCON 47 RDS 

1 (2) recognizes the educational opportunity that 

2 a National Medal of Honor Day would present to 

3 the American public; and 

4 (3) supports the goals and ideals of a National 

5 Medal of Honor Day to celebrate and honor the con6 tributions of Medal of Honor recipients. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 27, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### BRITT v. HAYES

No. 115PA01

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 262

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 May 2001. Conditional petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 May 2001.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . A P
- 7 6 , 5 6 8

E X P A R T E M I C H A E L B R A N D O N R E I D , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . 6 3 8 1
- B I N T H E D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M H A S K E L L C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte
Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d g uilty and was convicted of manufa cture and delivery of a controlled substance and sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appe al his conviction. Applicant contends that his conviction was in violation of his rig ht to due proce ss. The State and the tria l court ag ree that Applicant is entitled to relief

. Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 6381 in t h e 3 9 J u d icial District Court of t h2

Haske ll County is set asid e, an d Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the sheriff of Haske ll County to answer

the cha rg es as se t out in the indictment. Copies of this opinion shall be s e n t to th e T e xa s D e p a r tm e nt of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional
I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: May

25, 2011 Do Not Publish