alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1012]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   TRIBUTE TO COLONEL SCOTT E. MILLS

                                 ______

                          HON. PAUL E. GILLMOR

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 11, 1995
  Mr. GILLMOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Colonel Scott E. 
Mills, U.S. Air Force, on the occasion of his retirement from the 
military.
  Scott Mills has served as Chief of the U.S. Air Force Academy 
Activities Group since June, 1993. During the last 2 years, he has 
worked closely with many of our offices in coordinating Congressional 
nominations and inquiries for the Academy.
  Born in Berkeley, California, Scott Mills received a Bachelor of 
Science degree as a member of the U.S. Air Force Academy Class of 1973. 
He received a Master of Science in Logistics from the Air Force 
Institute of Technology in 1984. His professional military education 
includes Squadron Officer School, Air Command and Staff College, and 
the Air War College.
  Scott Mills' Air Force career is one marked diverse accomplishments. 
He is a Master Navigator with over 3,000 flying hours, serving as both 
C-141 navigator and C-141 navigator instructor. He has served with 4th 
Military Airlift Squadron, 323d Flying Training Wing, Headquarters Air 
Training Command, the Joint Cruise Missiles Project, and the 323d 
Support Group.
  Scott Mills has received numerous awards including the Defense 
Meritorious Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal with two oak 
leaf clusters and the Air Force Commodation Medal with one oak leaf 
cluster.
  Mr. Speaker, Scott Mills' service to his country has touched the 
lives of countless young men and women either serving in the U.S. Air 
Force or attending the United States Air Force Academy. His integrity 
and his commitment to excellence are the trademarks of his career.
  I ask my colleagues to joint me in thinking him for his distinguished 
and selfless service to our nation. As he returns to civilian life, may 
he and his family enjoy the full blessings of the freedom he has so 
ably defended during this career as a officer in the U.S. Air Force.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JORGE BARZAGA.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AF to mandate organizational, command climate on evaluation, feedback forms

              - Published  Dec. 20, 2013

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The Air Force will reinforce its performance evaluation system by requiring evaluators to assess what Airmen did to ensure a healthy organizational climate.Policy modifications, performance feedback, and officer and enlisted evaluation form changes will be implemented Jan. 1.

This increased focus is part of the overall Air Force effort to accentuate the emphasis on sexual assault prevention and response but encompasses a great deal more, according to Lt. Gen. Sam Cox, the deputy chief of staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services.  

According to the general, organizational climate is defined as the way members in a unit perceive and characterize their unit environment.  All Airmen are responsible for creating an organizational climate in which every member is treated with dignity and respect.

“It has always been the duty of every Airman to positively contribute to a healthy organizational climate by being a good wingman, adhering to and enforcing standards, not allowing any action that is harmful to the good order and discipline of the unit, not tolerating sexual assault and harassment or any type of discrimination, and of course, building an environment based on a foundation of dignity and respect," Cox said. “This modification to policy now reinforces our responsibilities for organizational climate, ensures it is discussed during feedback and mandates its consideration on every Airman’s evaluation.”

To assist evaluators, the evaluation and feedback forms will be amended to list organizational climate as a gradable factor for consideration and discussion, the general said.  

“This is extremely important as we place additional emphasis on this topic and truly change how culture is perceived in the Air Force,” Cox said.  

Although the climate of an organization is everyone’s responsibility, commanders have the ultimate responsibility for setting the command climate, and it is incumbent on the commander to continually measure his or her climate and adjust accordingly to the needs of that unit, Cox added.  The policy modifications acknowledge this unique responsibility and authority by mandating the consideration of a commander’s success in maintaining a healthy command climate on all commander evaluations.  

“A healthy organizational climate is vital to mission accomplishment and the well-being of the members of a unit,” Cox said.*(Courtesy of Air Force Public Affairs Agency Operating Location - P)*

performance evaluation formevaluationsexual assault preventionpersonnel
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET

  The Senate continued with the consideration of the concurrent 
resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the hour of 10:55 
a.m. having arrived, the Senate will now proceed to vote on amendment 
No. 1111. The question is on agreeing to the amendment. The yeas and 
nays have been ordered. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk called the roll.
  Mr. FORD. I announce that the Senator from California [Mrs. Boxer] is 
necessarily absent.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Shelby). Are there any other Senators in 
the Chamber desiring to vote?
  The result was announced--yeas 0, nays 99, as follows:

                      [Rollcall Vote No. 172 Leg.]

                                NAYS--99

     Abraham
     Akaka
     Ashcroft
     Baucus
     Bennett
     Biden
     Bingaman
     Bond
     Bradley
     Breaux
     Brown
     Bryan
     Bumpers
     Burns
     Byrd
     Campbell
     Chafee
     Coats
     Cochran
     Cohen
     Conrad
     Coverdell
     Craig
     D'Amato
     Daschle
     DeWine
     Dodd
     Dole
     Domenici
     Dorgan
     Exon
     Faircloth
     Feingold
     Feinstein
     Ford
     Frist
     Glenn
     Gorton
     Graham
     Gramm
     Grams
     Grassley
     Gregg
     Harkin
     Hatch
     Hatfield
     Heflin
     Helms
     Hollings
     Hutchison
     Inhofe
     Inouye
     Jeffords
     Johnston
     Kassebaum
     Kempthorne
     Kennedy
     Kerrey
     Kerry
     Kohl
     Kyl
     Lautenberg
     Leahy
     Levin
     Lieberman
     Lott
     Lugar
     Mack
     McCain
     McConnell
     Mikulski
     Moseley-Braun
     Moynihan
     Murkowski
     Murray
     Nickles
     Nunn
     Packwood
     Pell
     Pressler
     Pryor
     Reid
     Robb
     Rockefeller
     Roth
     Santorum
     Sarbanes
     Shelby
     Simon
     Simpson
     Smith
     Snowe
     Specter
     Stevens
     Thomas
     Thompson
     Thurmond
     Warner
     Wellstone

                             NOT VOTING--1

       
     Boxer
       
  So the amendment (No. 1111) was rejected.
  

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY BARNES.

February 6, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Cope North 22, Optimized Flying, Cyber Airmen at Red FlagPublished Feb. 11, 2022
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Garrett Hess
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force features Cope North 22, a large scale exercise in the Indo-Pacific with U.S., Japanese, and Australian forces, the Mission Execution Excellence Program, or MEEP, aims to save the Air Force about $80 million a year by increasing fuel efficiency and optimizing flights, and an all-military team of cyber Airmen set up a secure network to fly the F-35 at a major exercise. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann)

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Australia, Japan, US converge on Guam for Cope North 22****- Department of the Air Force launches pilot program to incentivize optimized flying****- In Air Force first, 388th FW uses Red Flag to demonstrate all-military ALIS deployment**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANDREW HUGHES.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bans v. V. Bayless et al.

(No. 1405, Op. Book No. *2,*p. 589.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1245. *Surety; discharged from liability, when, etc.*Appellant sued appellees Bayless, Rogers and Francis on their joint and several promissory note. Rogers and Francis pleaded and proved that they signed the note as sureties for Bayless, and that appellant knew at the time they signed the note that they were merely sureties upon it; that when the note fell due appellant and Bayless, without the knowledge or consent of said sureties, made a new contract, whereby Bayless, for a valuable consideration by him paid to appellant, to wit, by the payment in advance of interest at the rate of one and one-half per cent, per month, secured further time for the payment of said note, and the time for the payment of the note was accordingly extended. *Held:*These facts released and discharged Rogers and Francis from liability upon the note. *“*The authorities seem fully to establish the doctrine that there must be an agreement upon a sufficient consideration, and binding upon the creditor to give time, in order to discharge the surety, unless some other circumstance than a mere indulgence to the debtor he shown.” [Burke v. Cruger, 8 Tex. 71.] The payment of legal interest in advance, or any sum of money not specified in the contract, is a sufficient consideration to support an agreement to extend time. An agreement to forbear suit, *718made in consideration of a usurious premium, which has been executed by payment of the premium, and by forbearance accordingly, will discharge the surety. [2 Daniel on Neg. Inst. 303; Brandt on S.ureties, §§ 301-301.] The judgment of the court below was in favor of Rogers and Francis, discharging them from liability on the note, and was

October 3, 1881.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the *“Company* ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”* ),
      I,
      Patrick White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 30, 2008





/s/Patrick
                WhitePatrick
                WhiteChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
      Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 26,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                      84,584,000
<SECURITIES>                               159,821,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               57,538,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,564,000
<INVENTORY>                                 42,117,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           367,067,000
<PP&E>                                     632,356,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             311,561,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             727,381,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       79,727,000
<BONDS>                                    215,541,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 425,573,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               727,381,000
<SALES>                                    123,823,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           123,823,000
<CGS>                                      115,840,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              115,840,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,541,000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               912,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,999,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (55,167,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (15,998,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (39,169,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (39,169,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($1.58)


<FN>
Other Expenses reflect research and development expenses.
</FN>

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Airman earns French desert commando badgePublished Nov. 1, 2013
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Chad Thompson
                        
                        
                        Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa
                
                
**CAMP LEMONNIER, Djibouti (AFNS) –** An Air Force photojournalist graduated from a French military desert commando course Oct. 16 here, calling the experience an "11-day gut check."
Staff Sgt. Chad Warren, who is assigned to the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa public affairs office, started in a class of 160 members. Two Airmen and five Soldiers were among the 143 who successfully completed the physical and mental tests.
“Initially, I wanted to just do a story on this course, and take photos ... and then I thought, ‘oh this is a cool piece, there are some Americans going through this course, too,’” the Memphis, Tenn., native said. “I just happened to make the comment that it would be cool if I could go through it. I have always liked to challenge myself.”
Warren had to be cleared medically and physically before participating. He was also issued the necessary equipment and picked up a few tips from previous course graduates on how to deal with this demanding desert course.
“It was definitely a surprise coming into it, it’s a lot more physically demanding, and it’s a lot of work out here in the heat,” Warren said.
“This is one of four French commando courses. ...this is the desert/beach commando course so the bread and butter of the course is really (performing) war fighting skills in the assigned environment,” Warren explained.
The course was broken up into two squads. One squad started grueling combat tactics in the field and the other began a number of physically demanding and mentally exhausting courses designed to test their overall ability to survive. After completing the assigned tasks the groups swapped.
Warren had been in Africa for about five months, and he said he wasn’t too worried about his fitness level.
“I’m in the gym at least five days a week, so I thought that would play a big part in helping me with this (course), but it’s a different kind of physical fitness out (in the desert),” Warren said. “It’s not about how strong you are or how far you can run. It’s about how resilient you are, and how you can handle the heat, and how you can stay hydrated, and how you prepare yourself.”
Heat injuries are a main concern when dealing with desert survival. The French military designed this course to ensure their forces are ready for desert combat.
The final test for both squads was a 36-hour march through the desert to apply what they had learned throughout the course.
“I am glad I did it. You couldn’t pay me enough to do it again, but I’m very glad I did it,” Warren said.Horn Of Africa 



Djibouti
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 494 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the types of livestock 

for which bonus depreciation is available. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the types of livestock for which bonus depreciation is 

available. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF LIVESTOCK AVAILABLE FOR 

4 BONUS DEPRECIATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

6 168(k)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(v) DAIRY PRODUCING CALVES AND

9 COWS.—In the case of any dairy producing 

10 calf or cow, subparagraph (A) shall be apVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:27 Mar 09, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S494.IS S494

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 494 IS

1 plied without regard to clause (ii) there2 of.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply to property placed in service 

5 after December 31, 2012, in taxable years ending after 

6 such date. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### LINDA MYERS v. GUY MYERS.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 44665-7-I.

Division One.

April 17, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Rusnak, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-1-01246-8, Thomas J. Wynne, J., entered May 7, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32





Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: March 31, 2011,




/s/ Michael A. YedorMichael A. YedorChief Executive Officer/s/ Douglas BeachDouglas BeachChief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases FY24 special duty assignment pay adjustmentsPublished June 23, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has completed its annual review of special duty assignment pay for enlisted members using a new board process to ensure appropriate distribution based off the SDAP definition.
The review focused on identifying personnel in extremely demanding positions with unusually challenging responsibilities based on a defendable scoring methodology, and decisions were made agnostic of budgetary funding.
When reviewing more than 100 career fields, the board was unaware of the budgeted SDAP funds until after each request was considered if SDAP was warranted.
The Air Force approved 70 specialties to receive SDAP in FY24. Of those approved, four were initial requests that were certified for the first time, 48 were recertified at their current rate, 11 increased rate and seven decreased rate to maintain parity with specialties of similar duties, responsibilities and training.
The DAF eliminated 33 existing rules because they no longer met the criteria for SDAP and disapproved 15 new requests for the same reason. The changes will take effect Oct. 1.
The SDAP board used specific criteria when reviewing each request. To be considered, the specialty and individual assignment must meet one or more of the following criteria:

Duties require extremely demanding personal effort to ensure mission accomplishment.
 Position requires greater responsibility or difficulty beyond what is normally expected for the member’s grade.
 Position/duties require special qualifications met through rigorous screening and/or special schooling.Members currently serving in a field that will be removed from the SDAP list will continue to receive special duty assignment pay at a rate of one-half their original SDAP through Sept. 30, 2024. Those whose SDAP will be reduced will be given 90 days before the reduced rate will become effective. Personnel receiving an increase in SDAP will see it reflected beginning Oct. 1.
Visit **here** to view the full special duty assignment pay list and program updates.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



FY24 



SDAP 



special duty assignment pay 



adjustments 



annual review 



distribution 



readiness 



myFSS 



pay 



money 



finances 



budget