alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Austin City R. R. Co. v. John M. Swisher.

(No. 833, Op. Book No. 3, p. 426.)

Appeal from Travis County.

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§ 75. *Officers of corporation, compensation of.*An officer of a corporation cannot recover of the corporation any salary or compensation for services rendered, unless such salary or compensation has been fixed and agreed upon by the proper corporate authorities in some authorized manner, anterior to the performance of the services. [Kilpatrick v. Bridge Co. 49 Penn. St. 118; Holder v. R. R. Co. 71 Ill. 106.] This principle is not affected, although the corporate authorities, by subsequent resolution, agree to pay for such past services. A recovery at law cannot be had on such agreement. [Loan Ass’n v. Stonemetz, 29 Penn. St. 534; R. R. Co. v. Ketchum, 27 Conn. 170; Dunston v. Gas Co. 3 B. & Ad. 125.]

§ 7 6. *Trustee and cestui que trust; disqualified from,' acting, token.*A president or director of a corporation! bears the relation of trustee to the corporation, and is; *34disqualified from acting officially upon any matter of immediate personal and pecuniary interest to himself. [Butts v. Wood, 37 N. Y. 317.]

June 12, 1880.

§ 77. *Meetings of corporation.*A corporation is not represented by every casual meeting of a majority of its governing body, and all the directors, acting personally without an official meeting, could not bind the corporation. [Leonard v. Lent, 43 Wis. 83; Ang. *&*Ames on Corp. §§ 231, 489, 491, 492.]

Reversed and remanded.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

p0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138211

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138211 COA: 285814 Wayne CC: 03-000809 DION PATRICK DAWSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BARBARA SNELL.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                   AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany American Business Financial
Services, Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ending December 31, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I,
Anthony J. Santilli, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                                     /s/ Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 13, 2003
News United States Air Force
 Air Force announces support squadron commander candidatesPublished Sept. 30, 2013
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Ian Hoachlander
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO -- RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                More than 750 officers from 13 career fields were selected by development teams as 2014 support, logistics and air base commander candidates, Air Force officials announced Sept. 27.
"The selection process was very competitive," said Joseph Marchino, AFPC assignment officer. "Development teams consider all aspects of officers' records and duty history. They also factor in leadership ability, professional development and permanent change of station eligibility."
For more specific career field requirements, officers should refer to the appropriate career field page on the myPers website athttps://myPers.af.mil.
"Selected candidates have demonstrated traits essential for leading Airman to day-to-day operational success," Marchino said. "Additionally, squadron commanders are the best positioned to recognize and develop the talents and skills of their personnel for future leadership opportunities."
Wing hiring officials, major command functionals and AFPC assignment teams will use the candidate list to fill projected 2014 squadron commander vacancies, with those selection results tentatively planned for release in December.
"It is important to note," Marchino adds, "not all officers on the candidate lists will get command assignments. Development teams typically select more qualified officers than projected vacancies to account for a variety of unprojected events which occur throughout the year."
Candidates not selected for command will remain on this list, unless removed for one of a variety of reasons, such as selected for another assignment opportunity, until superseded by next year's results.
Candidate lists have been posted on the myPers website. To see the list and learn more about command opportunities and other personnel issues, visit https://mypers.af.mil. Enter PSDM 13-89 in the search box to locate the command match list.air base 



commander 



candidates 



selection 



logistics
[Nos. 41367-8-I; 42892-6-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Linniell Phipps, Jr., *Appellant.*The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Linniell Phipps, Jr., *Defendant,*Lechaun Dwayne Baker, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 97-1-02254-8, 97-1-02255-6, Michael J. Fox, J., entered September 15, 1997 and June 15, 1998. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Kennedy and Cox, JJ.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# IG Disparity Review survey deadline extended

              - Published  April 26, 2021
              -                             By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs                                                     

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **
The Department of the Air Force is extending the participation deadline for the **Inspector General Disparity Review** until May 9. Due to a significant response rate, the survey, which began April 9, will remain open to facilitate maximum feedback from Airmen and Guardians. 

The survey is part of the second ongoing Inspector General Disparity Review which expands its focus to gender and ethnicity, including Hispanics, Latinos, Asians, American Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders.

“To fully capture the voice of Airmen and Guardians, the Department of the Air Force **Inspector General** will keep the ongoing gender, racial and ethnic disparity review survey open for an extra week, said **Lt. Gen. Sami Said**, Air Force inspector general. “Feedback so far has been very high, so we’re keeping the survey open for an extra week to give everyone a chance to contribute to this very important effort. We highly encourage all our airmen and guardians to share their stories, views and concerns. To the tens of thousands that already have, thank you!”  

Survey results are anonymous and will be analyzed alongside targeted interviews, more than 100 small-group discussions with airmen and guardians across the DAF, targeted small-group surveys and a comprehensive review of available data. 

The Air Force Inspector General will publicly release results of the second disparity review this summer along with an update on progress based on the **first racial disparity review**.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceDisparity ReviewIGinspector generalOne Air ForceD/Idiversityinclusionextensionmaximum feedback
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Engineered Support
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31,
2004 (the "Report"), I, Gerald E. Daniels, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)  The Report complies with Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2004
     -----------------

By: /s/ Gerald E. Daniels
    -----------------------
    Gerald E. Daniels
    Vice Chairman and
    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and will be retained by
Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### PATRICIA CORRIGAN AND JAMES CORRIGAN v. COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of October 5,2011, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2011-C, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersignedhereby certifies that:

 

1)	I am a duly authorized officer of theServicer.

 

2)	A review of the activities of the Servicerfrom October 5, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance underthe Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)	Based on such review, the Servicer has,to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the RelevantPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executedthis Compliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2012.

 

 

 

HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, as Servicer

 

 

By: /s/ MIN SOK RANDY PARK              

Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MSO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report). I, Steven Straus, President of the Company, for the
period ending March 31, 2006, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven Straus Steven
StrausPresident

Date: June 21, 2006
##### 



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned officers, Wayne M. Fortun, Chief Executive Officer of Hutchinson Technology
Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation (the Company), and John A. Ingleman, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 27, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 26, 2005
    /s/ Wayne M. FortunWayne M. FortunChief Executive OfficerDate: April 26, 2005
    /s/ John A. InglemanJohn A. InglemanChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

              RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC. ANNOUNCES THE ACQUISITION
            OF CHARTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF MANATEE PALMS, LP

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, AUGUST 4, 2000 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) announced today that it has acquired the operating assets of
Charter Behavioral Health System of Manatee Palms, LP and the corresponding real
estate from Crescent Real Estate Funding VII, L.P. The business which is located
in Florida includes two owned and one contracted facility with 225 total beds
and an aftercare case management program serving over 200 adolescents. The
transaction was financed by an increase in the company's senior credit facility
and is expected to be accretive to earnings.

Commenting on the acquisition, Luis E. Lamela, President and CEO of Ramsay Youth
Services, Inc., stated, "We are very pleased to welcome the Charter Behavioral
Health System of Manatee Palms staff to our organization. This strategic
acquisition continues to broaden the Company's operations in Florida and expands
our capacity in Florida to over 700 beds."

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading quality provider and manager of
treatment, education and community-based programs for at-risk, troubled and
special needs youth. The Company has operations in nine states and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information.


Contact:     Isa Diaz
             Vice President Corporate Relations
             (305) 569-4626
Order entered September 23, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00729-CV

POSITIVE TRANSPORTATION LLC, THOMAS WHALEY AND 

THOMAS HATTON, JR., Appellants

V.

TTS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-09409

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ September 21, 2021 unopposed motion for a 

twenty-day extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the brief be filed no later than October 12, 2021.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
#### J. T. Sullivan & Co. v. J. M. McFarland.

(No. 2028, Op. Book No. 2, p. 503.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1198. *Appeal bond from justice’s court; madepayable to a firm, is sufficient.*The appeal bond in this case, on appeal from justice’s to county court, was made payable to appellants “ J. T. Sullivan & Co.,” without naming the members of that firm. *Held,*that this was. sufficient. The obligation of McFarland and his sureties upon the bond was as binding as if the names of each of the members of the firm had been set forth therein.

§ 1199. *Same; condition; “or” instead of “and” sufficient.*The appeal bond was conditioned “that the said J. M. McFarland shall prosecute his appeal to effect, *or*shall pay and satisfy the judgment,” etc. *Held*sufficient, notwithstanding the statute uses the word “and” in connecting the conditions, instead of “or,” as used in the bond. [Robinson v. Brinson, 20 Tex. 438.]

§ 1200. *Same; amount of;, costs.*The appeal bond was in the sum of $20. The judgment appealed from was a judgment against the plaintiff in the suit for costs. The costs amounted to $16.65, and of this amount McFarland had paid $9.40, which had been incurred by him. *Held,*that the bond was sufficient in amount.

§ 1201. *Damages for breach of contract for personal services; rules as to.*Where a party complains of a breach of contract for personal service, he may delay bringing his suit until the end of the term of the contract, and sue for the full amount covered by its terms; and in such case the defendant may recoup for whatever the plaintiff has earned, or by reasonable diligence could have earned, between the breach and expiration of the contract. Or the plaintiff may at anytime sue for the damages resulting from the breach of such contract. The damages recoverable in such suit are those resulting as a natural and legal consequence from the breach. Re*685mote ancl speculative damages are not ordinarily recoverable: There might be cases where thé elements of malice or gross oppression, or the like, entered into the breach, that would authorize vindictive or punitory damages.

November 9, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-81,552-02
IN RE TERRY GLENN HARRIS, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 2010-544-C1A IN THE 19 DISTRICT COURT

th F ROM MC LENNAN COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 19 District Court of McL ennan County , that more than 35 day s have elapsed, and that the

t h application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ um s t ances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of McL ennan C o u n t y , i s order ed to file a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating2

that Relator has not filed a n application for

a wr it of habea s corpus in McL ennan County
. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order. Filed: June 3, 2015 Do not publish
Exhibit 15.1



|September 29, 2015 |                            
|------------------ | ---------------------------
|                   |                            
|                   | Matter No.:  820813        
|                   | Doc Ref:  pl/al/102107753v1
|                   |                            
|                   | +852 2842 9551             
|                   | Paul.lim@conyersdill.com   



The Directors

YY Inc.

Building 3-08, Yangcheng Creative Industry Zone

No. 309 Huangpu Avenue Middle

Tianhe District

Guangzhou 510655

The People's Republic of China

Dear Sirs,



Re:  YY Inc. (the"Company")



We refer to the annual report of the Company
for the fiscal year ended 31 December, 2014 on Form 20-F filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 on or about 21 April, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”).



We consent to the filing of this letter
as an exhibit to the annual report of the Company on Form 20-F with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission and to the inclusion
therein of the reference to our name on page 79 of the annual report under the heading "Taxation – Cayman Islands"
in the form and context in which they appear, and further consent to the incorporation by reference of the summary of our opinion
under this heading ("Taxation – Cayman Islands") in the form and context in which they appear into the Company's
registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-187074) that was filed on March 6, 2013.



In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we are experts
within the meaning of Section 11 of the U.S. Securities Act, 1933 or that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required
under Section 7 of the Securities Act, 1933 or the Rules and Regulations of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission promulgated
thereunder.





Yours faithfully,



|/s/ Conyers Dill & Pearman | 
|-------------------------- | 
|Conyers Dill & Pearman     |
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Enlisted Airmanship Continuum, MCA Training Framework, New Coaching WebsitePublished Sept. 29, 2023
                        
                        By Senior Airman Saomy Sabournin
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the Enlisted Airmanship Continuum aims to provide new development opportunities for Airmen, there’s a new roadmap for training Multi-Capable Airmen, and the Air Force has a new website with resources to help find or become a professional coach. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



Enlisted Airmanship Continuum 



enlisted Airmen 



Multi-Capable Airmen 



Ace 



Agile Combat Employment 



MCA 



Coaching 



DAW 



Coaching Website 



mentorship Related Links
        Air Force releases Enlisted Airmanship Continuum
            
            Air Force introduces MCA training framework
            
            DAF launches coaching website