alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.6
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of October 1, 2011, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc ., as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and
Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, NA, as Special Servicer, U.S.
Bank National Association, as Trustee, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, inc., as
Trust Advisor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian,
Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, with
respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-C3 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have
the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the
Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,406,312
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,554,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                   273,077
<INVENTORY>                                  5,555,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,017,522
<PP&E>                                      28,771,223
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,386,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,611,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,594,766
<BONDS>                                      2,133,138
<COMMON>                                        37,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,044,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,611,343
<SALES>                                     67,508,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,508,389
<CGS>                                       56,640,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,640,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,515,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,325
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,327,793
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,129,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,198,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,198,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4513]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Durbin] 
will lead the membership in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. DURBIN led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.

                          ____________________
```
#### Atlantic Ins. Co. v. Sinker, Davis & Co.

(No. 1511, Op. Book No. 2, p. 145.)

Appeal from Parker County.

Opinion by

Walker, A. S., J.

■ § 954. *Garnishment; venue.*The Atlantic Insurance-Company was garnished in a suit pending in P. county. The company was located in New Yoi’k. Service was had upon its agent, who resided in T. county. The agent pleaded to the jurisdiction of the county court of P. county, and also answered that the company was indebted to two of the debtors upon a policy of insurance for loss by fire of property situated in P. county. The plea to the jurisdiction was overruled. *Held*that, in the absence of any allegation showing a liability of the company to be sued in P. county, the court erred in overruling the plea to the jurisdiction. The statute [Pas. Dig. 167; R. S. 195] does not require the garnishee, when answer is contested (and the answer in this case was contested), to litigate elsewhere than at his residence. In this case the facts developed that the policy of insurance-from which the debt arose was upon property in P. county. Had the pleadings developed such facts, it would' have become necessary to determine whether the general law fixing venue in suits against foreign corporations, ■would not control. Article 22, R. S., authorizes suits-against fire insurance companies in any county where any part of the insured property is situated, but in this case there was no allegation in the plaintiff’s pleadings, which brought the case within this article.

*537June 16, 1880.

§ 955. *Amendment; garnishee; subsequent writs.*A garnishee has the right to amend his answer, but such amendment cannot do more than state facts existing at the time of the garnishment, and bearing upon the liability of the garnishee at that date. Subsequent writs of garnishment served upon the garnishee could not affect the rights of the plaintiffs in the first writ, and an amended answer of the garnishee setting up such subsequent proceedings was held to be immaterial and properly stricken out.

§ 9 5 8. *Garnishment; where the debtor is a firm.*Where there are several defendants, the property of each is of course liable for the whole debt. In such case, therefore, if it appear that the garnishee is indebted to one'or more of the defendants, though not to all, he will be charged. [Drake on Attach. § 5G6.]

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Michigan Air Guard pilot awarded Distinguished Flying CrossPublished Nov. 12, 2020
                        
                        
                        127th Wing
                **SELFRIDGE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Mich. (AFNS) --**
                **Secretary of the Air Force Barbara M. Barrett** presented Maj. Brett DeVries, a 107th Fighter Squadron pilot, the Distinguished Flying Cross Nov. 6 for extraordinary flight achievement.
“The Distinguished Flying Cross is America’s oldest military aviation decoration,” Barrett said. “Awarded for heroism or extraordinary achievement that is, ‘entirely distinctive, involving operations that are not routine,’ today, Maj. DeVries, you will join the ranks of some other American heroes.”
The training flight narrowly avoided catastrophe on July 20, 2017, when DeVries successfully landed his **A-10 Thunderbolt II** with neither a canopy nor fully engaged landing gear.
“Maj. DeVries truly put service before self and demonstrated a level of airmanship to which we should all aspire,” said Brig. Gen. Rolf E. Mammen, 127th Wing commander, during the ceremony.
The first award of the Distinguished Flying Cross was made to 10 Army Air Corps aviators for participation in the Army Pan American Flight, officially awarded May 2, 1927. The first presentation of the award was on June 11, 1927, when President Calvin Coolidge honored Charles Lindbergh for his first transatlantic solo flight.
While DeVries was flying the A-10 during the emergency, he relied heavily on his wingman, then-Maj. Shannon Vickers, and the maintenance team back at Selfridge Air National Guard Base. Mammen said DeVries had the entire Wing standing behind him.
“As a commander, I cannot tell you how proud I am of Maj. DeVries and our entire 127th Wing, who work so hard every day to ensure that we are ready to fly, fight and win,” Mammen said.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



ANG 



Air National Guard 



Distinguished Flying Cross 



award 



medal 



recognition 



Michigan Air National Guard Related Links
        Maj. Brett Devries Awarded Distinguished Flying Cross
                                
                                Air Force Secretary Barbara Barrett presented the Distinguished Flying Cross to Maj. Brett DeVries from the 127th Wing. DeVries was recognized for safely landing an A-10 Thunderbolt II after a catastrophic aircraft malfunction that caused the canopy to eject and crippled the landing gear. DeVries, a senior A-10 pilot assigned to the 107th Fighter Squadron, has more than 2,000 flight hours to include 830 in combat. (U.S. Air National Guard video by Andrew Schumann)


#MichiganNationalGuard #CornerstoneMICommunities #ExcellenceInAllWeDo #WeStandReady #MING #ANG #expeditionaryreadiness #TeamSelfridge #127thWing #Selfridge #MichiganNationalGuard #CenterForPerformanceExcellence #SECAF #A10 #DFC #ReadyAF
#### James A. Ring v. J. M. Smith et al.

(No. 1839, Op. Book No. *2,*p. 376.)

Appeal from Fannin County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§1115. *Homestead; constituent of family.*Suit by appellees and against appellant for their proportionate share of the rents of premises which had been occupied and used by appellant. The premises were the homestead of the parents of appellant and appellees, at the time of their death. Appellant, at the death of his mother, the last surviving parent, which occurred in 1873, was a minor, and the only remaining constituent of the family, the other children having all arrived at maturity. Appellant arrived at the age of maturity August 21, 1879. *Held:*The law in force at the time of the death of appellant’s mother vested the homestead right in him, as the surviving constituent of the family, and it was not necessary to the enjoyment and exercise of that right for the probate court to designate and set the same aside to him, for in such case the law declares that the homestead did not constitute any part of the estate. The appellant was undoubtedly entitled to the use and occupation of the homestead, together with the fruits and revenues thereof, until lie -arrived at full age, and this right in him was entirely independent of the claims of the creditors of his parents’ estates, and of those of the other heirs. It was never intended that the constituent of the family should be nothing more than an involuntary lessee of the home*628stead on a credit, the rents, revenues and profits of which he would be compelled to account for upon arriving at his majority. Such a construction of the law cannot be maintained. Enlightened justice would rebel, and common honesty denounce it. The right conferred by law is independent and absolute. [Note.— The question as to the *status*of the homestead with regard to the rights of the children after appellant arrived at the age of maturity was alluded to in the opinion, but a decision of it not being necessary to a disposition of the case, no expression of opinion thereon was made by the court.]

June 25, 1881.

§ 1116. *Tenants in common; not entitled to rents from each other.*One tenant in common cannot maintain an action against his co-tenant for any part of the rents and profits of the common property in the absence of a special agreement between them to account for rents. [McGrady v. McRae, *ante,*p. 583; 12 Cal. 419.]

Reversed and rendered.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 179 (Thursday, September 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56535-56536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23109]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are

[[Page 56536]]

set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 1, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. The Margaret E. Thelen Revocable Trust dated January 5, 2000, 
Margaret E. Thelen, Trustee, Baxter, Minnesota, individually, and with 
John A. Thelen, Jr., Baxter, Minnesota; Nancy M. Shipman, Brainerd, 
Minnesota; Sharon M. Watland, Baxter, Minnesota; Robert T. Thelen, 
Baxter, Minnesota; Michael J. Thelen, Nisswa, Minnesota; Kathryn M. 
Stalheim, Oviedo, Florida; Steven D. Thelen, Tampa, Florida; Luke D. 
Shipman, Brainerd, Minnesota; Daniel J. Shipman, Brainerd, Minnesota; 
Elizabeth A. Shipman, Breezy Point, Minnesota; and Adam J. Shipman, 
Brainerd, Minnesota, as a group acting in concert; to retain control of 
American Bancorporation of Minnesota, Inc., Brainerd, Minnesota, and 
thereby indirectly retain control of American National Bank of 
Minnesota, Baxter, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 13, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-23109 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
No. 87-1277.

#### Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction *v.*Nelson.

C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 904.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that John Wesley Hall, Jr., Esq., of Little Rock, Ark., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.
[No. 24070-0-II.

Division Two.

March 31, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Matthew James Lemon, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 98-8-00417-5, David Hatch, J. Pro Tern., J, entered November 12, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J, concurred in by Bridge-water, C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
**Exhibit 23.4**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-184562) of SandRidge Permian Trust of our report dated February 28, 2014 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

 

 
| /s/   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |
|                             |   |
| Tulsa,   Oklahoma                |   |
| September 25,   2014        |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Exeo Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended November
30, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Amaral,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
    of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Robert
    S. Amaral                                                                               | Dated: | April 14, 2022
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------ | --------------
|       | Robert
    S. Amaral                                                                                   |        |               
|Title: | Chief
                                         Financial Officer
        (Principal
Financial Officer)



This
certification is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A
signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### G. H. & S. A. R’y Co. v. H. M. Ehrenworth.

(No. 1061, Op. Book No. 2, p. 373.)

Appeal from Colorado County.

March 12, 1881.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 786. *Statute of frauds; when promise to pay debt of another is not within the.*It is well settled that if one, for a sufficient consideration, undertakes to pay a debt due to another by a third party, such an undertaking is not within the statute of frauds. [Thomas v. Hammond, 47 Tex. 42; Monroe v. Buchanan, 27 Tex. 241; Rollison v. Hope, 18 Tex. 446.] In this case, one Turnbrough was indebted to appellee. Turnbrough turned over to appellant wood and monies due him by appellant, and in consideration thereof appellant agreed to pay certain debts owing by Turnbrough, of which appellee’s debt was one. This agreement between Turnbrough and appellant was made known to appellee, and agreed to by him, and .he released Turnbrough from the debt, and looked to appellant for its payment. This suit was against appellant to recover the debt, and in the court below appellee recovered judgment for the debt, and the court of appeals held that the undertaking of appellant was not within the statute of frauds, and that there was no error in the' judgment.

Affirmed.
#### Frank R. Dean, Collector, etc., v. Morritz Kopperl.

(No. 727, Op. Book No. 2, p. 258.)

Error from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§ 7 46. *Taxes; assessment of, upon bank stock tinder law in force in September,*1876; *injunction, etc.*Under the laws in force in September, 1S76, it was competent for the assessor of taxes to assess for taxation the shares held by defendant in error in the National Bank of Texas, even though such assessment was supplemental; and the *410owner failing or refusing to affix a taxable value to said property, such valuation could be made by the assessor. [Laws 1873, chap. 83, sec. 9; Laws 1874, chap. 157, p. 213, and chap. 125, sec. 5, p. 176.] The assessment in this case appears to have been regular and authorized by law, and the plaintiff in injunction was not entitled to an injunction restraining the sale of his property for the taxes, in the absence of a tender of the amount of taxes due. [Harrison v. Vines, 46 Tex. 15; National Bank v. Rogers, 51 Tex. 606.]

March 17, 1880.

Reversed and dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick White,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
17, 2010





/s/ Patrick WhitePatrick
      WhiteChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

 

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, NA, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-C3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|