Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 57501 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2755’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/handbook_on_electronic

_filing.pdf). Persons with questions 

regarding electronic filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR § 201.6. 

Documents for which confidential 

treatment by the Commission is 

properly sought will be treated 

accordingly. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

Issued: September 16, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23488 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1063, 1064, 

1066–1068 (Review)] 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From 

Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and 

Vietnam 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

duty orders on frozen warmwater 

shrimp from Brazil, China, India, 

Thailand, and Vietnam. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of full reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) 

(the Act) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on frozen warmwater shrimp 

from Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and 

Vietnam would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. The Commission has determined 

that these reviews are extraordinarily 

complicated, and will therefore exercise 

its authority to extend its time for 

making its determinations by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). For further information 

concerning the conduct of these reviews 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: April 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

theses reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On April 9, 2010, the 

Commission determined that it should 

proceed to full reviews in the subject 

five-year reviews pursuant to section 

751(c)(5) of the Act (75 FR 22424, April 

28, 2010). The Commission found that 

both the domestic and respondent 

interested party group responses to its 

notice of institution (75 FR 1078, 

January 8, 2010) were adequate for each 

order under review. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements are available from the Office 

of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s web site. 

Participation in the reviews and 

public service list.—Persons, including 

industrial users of the subject 

merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in these reviews as parties 

must file an entry of appearance with 

the Secretary to the Commission, as 

provided in section 201.11 of the 

Commission’s rules, by 45 days after 

publication of this notice. A party that 

filed a notice of appearance following 

publication of the Commission’s notice 

of institution of the reviews need not 

file an additional notice of appearance. 

The Secretary will maintain a public 

service list containing the names and 

addresses of all persons, or their 

representatives, who are parties to the 

reviews. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and BPI service list.—Pursuant to 

section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s 

rules, the Secretary will make BPI 

gathered in these reviews available to 

authorized applicants under the APO 

issued in the reviews, provided that the 

application is made by 45 days after 

publication of this notice. Authorized 

applicants must represent interested 

parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), 

who are parties to the reviews. A party 

granted access to BPI following 

publication of the Commission’s notice 

of institution of the reviews need not 

reapply for such access. A separate 

service list will be maintained by the 

Secretary for those parties authorized to 

receive BPI under the APO. 

Staff report.—The prehearing staff 

report in the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on January 12, 

2011, and a public version will be 

issued thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.64 of the Commission’s rules. 

Hearing.—The Commission will hold 

a hearing in connection with the 

reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on 

February 1, 2011, at the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

Building. Requests to appear at the 

hearing should be filed in writing with 

the Secretary to the Commission on or 

before January 25, 2011. A nonparty 

who has testimony that may aid the 

Commission’s deliberations may request 

permission to present a short statement 

at the hearing. All parties and 

nonparties desiring to appear at the 

hearing and make oral presentations 

should attend a prehearing conference 

to be held at 9:30 a.m. on January 25, 

2011, at the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building. Oral testimony 

and written materials to be submitted at 

the public hearing are governed by 

sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, 

and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. 

Parties must submit any request to 

present a portion of their hearing 

testimony in camera no later than 7 

business days prior to the date of the 

hearing. 

Written submissions.—Each party to 

the reviews may submit a prehearing 

brief to the Commission. Prehearing 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
57502 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 

briefs must conform with the provisions 

of section 207.65 of the Commission’s 

rules; the deadline for filing is January 

20, 2011. Parties may also file written 

testimony in connection with their 

presentation at the hearing, as provided 

in section 207.24 of the Commission’s 

rules, and posthearing briefs, which 

must conform with the provisions of 

section 207.67 of the Commission’s 

rules. The deadline for filing 

posthearing briefs is February 10, 2011; 

witness testimony must be filed no later 

than three days before the hearing. In 

addition, any person who has not 

entered an appearance as a party to the 

reviews may submit a written statement 

of information pertinent to the subject of 

the reviews on or before February 10, 

2011. On March 7, 2011, the 

Commission will make available to 

parties all information on which they 

have not had an opportunity to 

comment. Parties may submit final 

comments on this information on or 

before March 9, 2011, but such final 

comments must not contain new factual 

information and must otherwise comply 

with section 207.68 of the Commission’s 

rules. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even 

where electronic filing of a document is 

permitted, certain documents must also 

be filed in paper form, as specified in 

II(c) of the Commission’s Handbook on 

Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 

68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

reviews must be served on all other 

parties to the reviews (as identified by 

either the public or BPI service list), and 

a certificate of service must be timely 

filed. The Secretary will not accept a 

document for filing without a certificate 

of service. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 

published pursuant to section 207.62 of 

the Commission’s rules. 

Issued: September 14, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23474 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Robotics Technology 

Consortium, Inc. 

Correction 

In notice document 2010–22215 

beginning on page 54914 in the issue of 

Thursday, July 9, 2010, make the 

following corrections: 

1. On page 54914, in the first column, 

in the sixteenth line below the 

document subject, ‘‘AEB, Inc.’’ should 

read ‘‘ABB, Inc.’’. 

2. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the 23rd line below the 

document subject, ‘‘BEN Technologies 

Corp’’ should read ‘‘BBN Technologies 

Corp’’. 

3. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the eighth line from the 

bottom of the page, ‘‘Amstin, TX’’ should 

read ‘‘Austin, TX’’. 

4. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the last line of the column, 

‘‘101–Integrated Consultants, Inc.’’ 

should read ‘‘ICI–Integrated Consultants, 

Inc.’’ 

5. On the same page, in the third 

column, in the first full paragraph, in 

the second and third lines, ‘‘activity of 

this group research additional written 

membership’’ should read ‘‘ activity of 

the group research project. Membership 

in this group research project remains 

open, and RTC intends to file additional 

written notifications disclosing all 

changes in membership.’’ 

6. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the second full paragraph, in 

the first through sixth lines, ‘‘On 

October 15, pursuant to Section the 

group research project. Membership in 

the project remains open, and RTC 

intends to file notifications disclosing 

all changes. In 2009, RTC filed its 

original notification 6(a) of the Act.’’ 

should read, ‘‘On October 15, 2009, RTC 

filed its original notification pursuant to 

section 6(a) of the Act.’’ 

[FR Doc. C1–2010–22215 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,281] 

Humana Insurance Company, a 

Division Of Carenetwork, Inc., Green 

Bay, WI; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated August 23, 2010, 

petitioners requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on 

August 13, 2010. The Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on August 30, 2010 (75 

FR 52986). Workers are engaged in 

employment related to the supply of 

health insurance benefits. 

The negative determination 

applicable to workers and former 

workers at Humana Insurance Company, 

a Division of CareNetwork, Inc., Green 

Bay, Wisconsin was based on the 

findings that the subject firm did not, 

during the period under investigation, 

shift to a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with the supply of 

health insurance benefits provided by 

the workers or acquire these services 

from a foreign country; that the workers’ 

separation, or threat of separation, was 

not related to any increase in imports of 

like or directly competitive services; 

and that the workers did not supply a 

service that was directly used in the 

production of an article or the supply of 

service by a firm that employed a 

worker group that is eligible to apply for 

TAA based on the aforementioned 

article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners provided additional 

information pertaining to a shift in 

services abroad. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES