alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000773136
<NAME> RAMSAY HEALTH CARE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,751,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,630,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,521,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,285,000
<PP&E>                                      54,601,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,020,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,087,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,220,000
<BONDS>                                     52,250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,636,000
<PREFERRED>                                  3,399,000
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,394,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               125,087,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,046,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,620,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,648,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,840,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,749,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (31,811,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,411,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (41,222,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (41,222,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.82)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEITH EARL ALFORD.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                         672,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,906,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                   207,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,698,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,351,512
<PP&E>                                      28,036,111
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,533,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,097,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,879,395
<BONDS>                                      2,386,687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,673
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,816,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,097,105
<SALES>                                     24,025,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,025,480
<CGS>                                       20,212,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,744,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,564,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (260,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (260,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (260,032)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2978 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate at least one city 

in the United States each year as an American World War II City, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2014 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate 

at least one city in the United States each year as 

an American World War II City, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF AMERICAN WORLD WAR II 

4 CITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 shall designate at least one city in the United States each 

7 year as an ‘‘American World War II City’’. 

8 (b) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION.—After the des9 ignation made under subsection (c), the Secretary, in conVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:35 Dec 06, 2014 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2978.IS S2978

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2978 IS

1 sultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall make each 

2 designation under subsection (a) based on the following 

3 criteria: 

4 (1) Contributions by a city to the war effort 

5 during World War II, including those related to de6 fense manufacturing, bond drives, service in the 

7 Armed Forces, and the presence of military facilities 

8 within the city. 

9 (2) Efforts by a city to preserve the history of 

10 the city’s contributions during World War II, includ11 ing through the establishment of preservation orga12 nizations or museums, restoration of World War II 

13 facilities, and recognition of World War II veterans. 

14 (c) FIRST AMERICAN WORLD WAR II CITY.—The 

15 city of Wilmington, North Carolina, is designated as an 

16 ‘‘American World War II City’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Cecil Ray King, Appellant

No. 06-23-00193-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 115th District Court of 

Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

F15400). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Rambin. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for 

further proceedings.

We further order that the appellee, the State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases Bridge Tanker Sources Sought AnnouncementPublished June 17, 2021
                        
                        
                        Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center issued a Sources Sought Announcement for the Bridge Tanker Program to determine the number of qualified, interested companies capable of providing solutions for the planned, non-developmental tanker recapitalization program.The Air Force is seeking companies that have the capability to deliver commercial derivative tanker aircraft to supplement the Air Force tanker aircraft fleet at the end of **KC-46A Pegasus** production.The new aircraft will bridge the gap to the next Advanced Air Refueling Tanker recapitalization phase, previously referred to as “KC-Z.” The existing KC-46A firm-fixed price contract is limited to 13 production lots, with the last planned procurement in 2027 and delivered in 2029.As a commercial derivative aircraft, the Bridge Tanker will be based on existing and emerging technologies with a full and open acquisition competition. Neither developmental stealth nor unmanned capability is planned.The requirements for Bridge Tanker are currently being defined and the necessary capabilities will be incorporated into the final Request for Proposal once it is validated through the Department of Defense’s joint staffing process. The Air Force plans to release the final RFP by the end of 2022.The **KC-135 Stratotanker** will be 70 years old when the Air Force expects to receive its last KC-46 delivery in 2029, and replacing these vital aircraft continues to be critical to the Air Force mission to project Rapid Global Mobility in today’s strategically competitive environment.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



modernization 



AFMC 



Air Force Materiel Command 



AFLCMC 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



KC-46 



Pegasus
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases technical sergeant/22E6 promotion cycle statisticsPublished July 20, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kiana Pearson
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected 5,430 staff sergeants for promotion to technical sergeant, out of 33,935 eligible, for a selection rate of 16% in the 22E6 promotion cycle, which includes supplemental promotion opportunities.The average overall score for those selected was 379.04. Selectees’ average time in grade was 4.51 years and time in service was 9.44 years.The promotion list is available on theAir Force’s Personnel Center’s **Enlisted Promotions page**, the Air Force Portal andmyPers. Airmen can access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight application via the AFPC secure page.For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the**AFPC public website**.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Technical Sergeant 



promotions 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



AFPC 



22E6 



select 



enlisted
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000774454
<NAME> GLOBAL VENTURE FUNDING, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          61,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,969
<PP&E>                                          23,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     90,417
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                    (163,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,336
<SALES>                                        142,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,643
<CGS>                                           36,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               148,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (42,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00) <F1>
<FN>
<F1>
Not applicable due to loss.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.4




	
	Exhibit 4.4

  
 



 
 RIGHTS CERTIFICATE #: NUMBER OF RIGHTS 
THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF THE RIGHTS OFFERING ARE SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY’S PROSPECTUS 
DATED , 2014 (THE “PROSPECTUS”) AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE. COPIES OF 
THE PROSPECTUS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FROM AST PHOENIX ADVISORS, THE INFORMATION AGENT. 
Ikanos Communications, Inc. 
Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware 
NON - TRANSFERABLE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS CERTIFICATE 
Evidencing Non - Transferable Subscription
Rights to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Ikanos Communications, Inc. 
Subscription Price: $0.41 per Share 
THE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE IF NOT EXERCISED ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M., NEW YORK CITY TIME,

ON , 2014, UNLESS EXTENDED BY IKANOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 
REGISTERED

OWNER: 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT the registered owner whose name is inscribed
hereon is the owner of the number of non-transferable subscription rights (“Subscription Rights”) set forth above. Each Subscription Right give the holder thereof a basic subscription right that entitles the holder to subscribe for and
purchase 1.459707 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Ikanos Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation, at a subscription price of $0.41 per share, pursuant to a rights offering (the “Rights Offering”), on the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus and the “Instructions as to Use of Ikanos Communications, Inc. Rights Certificates” accompanying this Rights Certificate. If all of such basic subscription rights are exercised,
such holder will be entitled to exercise an over-subscription privilege, subject to the limitations described in the Prospectus. 
The Subscription Rights
represented by this Rights Certificate may be exercised by completing Section 1 and any other appropriate forms on the reverse side hereof and by retuning the full payment of the subscription price for each share of Common Stock in accordance with
the “Instructions as to Use of Ikanos Communications, Inc. Rights Certificates” that accompany this Rights Certificate. 
This Rights Certificate is not
valid unless countersigned by the subscription agent and registered by the registrar. Witness the seal of Ikanos Communications, Inc. and the signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
Dated: 
President, Chief Executive Officer 
and Principal Executive Officer 
Vice President, 
General Counsel and Secretary 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 
(New York, N.Y.) TRANSFER AGENT 
AND REGISTRAR 
By: 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 476 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 476

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2014

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK 
              COMMISSION.

    The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission 
(referred to in this Act as the ``Commission'') is authorized in 
accordance with the provisions of section 6 of the Chesapeake and Ohio 
Canal Development Act (16 U.S.C. 410y-4), except that the Commission 
shall terminate 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate July 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Hunter & Lee v. Hatler & Osborne.

(No. 1589, Op. Book No. 2, p. 292.)

Appeal from Collin County.

February 23, 1881.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1055. *Amendment; new cause of action.*Appellees sued appellants for damages for the wrongful conversion of a lot of *bois d'etre*balls, alleging the value of the balls. By an amended petition he alleged the value of the seed in the balls, and the conversion of the seed. *Held,*the demand is not changed or enlarged by the amendment. The original demand is not abandoned. The claim for the conversion of the balls of course includes the seed in them. The cause of action under our system of pleading depends upon the facts stated in the petition that ai’e appropriate for a recovery, rather than upon the particular breach laid, or the specific relief prayed. [Lee v. Boutwell, *44*Tex. 151.]

Affirmed.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 0 931

- C R

Style: Melissa Dromgoole

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : March 24 , 2014

Type of motion: Motion regarding reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Reporter (Terri L. Johnstone)

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time , absent extraordinary circumstances

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Court reporter Terri Johnstone filed a document on March 24, 2014, which the Court will construe as a

motion. In her motion, Terri Johnstone states that she mistakenly included in her portion of the reporter’s

record a document titled “Management of Vasovagal Syncope” as defense exhibit 8. This document was

never offered or admitted into evidence, and, therefore, Terri Johnstone states it should not be part of the

record. We grant the motion and order Terri Johnstone to file a revised Volume 11 of the reporter’s

record, excluding the document titled “Management of Vasovagal Syncope,” labeled as defense exhibit 8

and currently con tained in Volume 11 of the reporter’s record , which was filed on March 21, 2014. This

order does not affect the briefing deadlines set in this case.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: April 7 2014
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OTIS BENNETT.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force wins top honors at international film festivalPublished Nov. 25, 2013
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Eric Burks
                        
                        
                        2nd Combat Camera Squadron
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                Two Air Force video productions won awards at the 23rd International Defence Film Festival in Rome last week, including the "Grand Prix - Plaque of the President of the Italian Republic” award for best overall production, according to a festival press release.
The “Grand Prix” award went to the “2nd Combat Camera in Action” mission video, while the Air Force also won top honors for the “Hispanic Recruiting" production in the "Promotion" category, both of which were produced by the 2nd Combat Camera Squadron here.
Forty-five productions from 13 nations were judged by an international panel of filmmakers at this year’s festival, organized by the cultural association Eserciti e Popoli (Armies and Peoples).
The awards were presented to a delegate of the American Embassy in Rome, said Italian Maj. Paolo Insalata, the IDFF executive director.
"It's a tremendous honor for the Air Force to earn this distinction," said Maj. Greg Hignite, the 2nd CTCS commander. "Our Airmen are always seeking new and compelling ways to communicate with our force. This recognition solidifies that commitment to their craft."
Adam White, a 2nd CTCS producer and director of the Grand Prix-winning production, said a lot of work went into the project, and the squadron is honored to be recognized at the festival. He went on to say that the goal of the mission video was to demonstrate the squadron’s unique capabilities through creative storytelling, rather than straight documentation.
“I think what’s interesting is the angle that was taken with this video, said Staff Sgt. Michael McCool, a 2nd CTCS broadcaster. “It had a fictional story that was laid out of a scenario that took place."
He added, “It was in all actuality an informative video saying ‘Here’s what we do as a squadron,’ but it did it in a fun, interesting and creative way.”
McCool, who shot much of the footage for the mission video, said, “We enjoy our jobs and we have a passion for it. I think when you watch the video, you see that passion.”
White said that work ethic and pride are evident in all the squadron’s efforts, not just those that result in awards.
“We’re honored to receive this award, and we’re proud of that video,” he said. “But we’re proud of all the work we do here, and so we’ll continue to come in, work hard, and love what we do.”
To view the award-winning videos and other 2nd CTCS productions, visit: http://www.youtube.com/user/2ndCombatCamera.2nd Combat Camera Squadron 



combat camera Related Links
        Air Force wins top International Film Award
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Craig M. McKenzie, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ZaZa Energy Corporation;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 14, 2012

/s/
Craig M. McKenzie
Craig M. McKenzie Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

---



QuickLinks