alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONFIDENTIAL


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE OPTION AGREEMENT



 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT IS MADE TO THE OPTION AGREEMENT concerning intellectual property, proprietary data and know-how related to the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections using cannabinoids ("UM 5070") with an effective date of July 1, 2014 by and between THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI, NATIONAL CENTER FOR NATURAL PRODUCTS RESEARCH, with a principal address at University, Mississippi 38677 (hereinafter called "UM"), and NEMUS, a California corporation with a principal address at 16440 Bake Parkway, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92618 (hereinafter called "NEMUS).   The Effective Date of this Second Amendment is October 15, 2014.







Whereas, the Option Agreement was amended (the "First Amendment") on August 15, 2014 to delay payment of a monthly option fee by NEMUS to UM to allow NEMUS to receive Additional Information.







The Parties hereby agree to the following changes to the Option Agreement:







NEMUS hereby agrees to pay UM an option fee of *** per month starting on 10/15/14 in order for NEMUS to complete due diligence and develop a research plan.







The Option Agreement will expire on March 15, 2015 and may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties in writing under the financial terms detailed in Section I.1.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this agreement to be duly executed by its legally authorized agent on the day and year indicated below.




 








	
THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	
/s/ WALTER G. CHAMBLISS

	
10/20/14


	
Name:

	
Walter G. Chambliss, Ph.D

	
Date


	
Title:

	
Director of Technology Management

	
 


	
 

	
Office of Research and Sponsored Programs

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Acknowledged:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	
/s/ MAHMOUD A. ELSOHLY

	
10/20/14


	
Name:

	
Mahmoud A. ElSohly, Ph.D.

	
Date


	
Title:

	
Research Professor, National Center for Natural Products Research


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
NEMUS, a California Corporation


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	
/s/ REG A. LAPHAM

	
10/17/14


	
Name:

	
Reg A. Lapham

	
Date


	
Title:

	
CEO

	
 







  


 


*** Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked with three asterisks (***), has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00240

- CR

Gerry Don Rudolph

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From The County Court

o f Young County (35479 )

July 24, 20 14

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgmen t of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: July 18, 2018Published July 18, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look Around the Air Force the KC-46 Pegasus program completes its final flight tests, and five Airmen receive the Air Force’s first ever “R” device for their actions in combat operations. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz.
For previous episodes, click **here**for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:KC-46 completes flight testing required for October first aircraft deliveryAir Force awards first Remote device: Dominant persistent attack aircrew recognizedATAF 



Air ForceTV 



Around the Air Force 



KC-46 



Pegasus 



remote 



R 



device 



medal 



RPS 



CreechAFB 



Nevada
#### METROMEDIA, INC. v. DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF TAXATION.

March 28, 1983.

Petition for certification granted. (See — *N.J.*— (1984))
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R OB ER T LEW IS B UR SHIA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-30122

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00093-B M M M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na B ria n M . M orris, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . R obe rt Le wis B urshia

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 144-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his jury-tria l c onvic tion for thre e c ounts of a ssa

ult with a da

nge rous we a

pon, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 1153(a), 113(a )(3), a

nd one c ount of a ssa

ult re sulting in se

rious bodily

injury , in 

# F IL ED JUN 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 1153(a), 113(a )(6). W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

nd we a ffirm . B urshia c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by fa iling to e xpla in these nte nc e a de quate ly , inc luding why it im p ose d a c onse c utive 24-m onth se nte nc e on the se rious bodily injury c ount. W e re vie wfor pla in e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd find none . The re c ord re fle c ts tha

t the distric t c ourt c onside re d the re le va nt 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte nc ing fa c tors, inc luding B urshia ’ s substa nc e a buse proble m s , a

nd suffic i e ntly

e xpla ine d the ba sis for these nte nc e . B urshia a lso c onte nds tha

t his 144-month se nte nc e is substa ntive ly unre a s ona

ble be c a use his ne e d for re ha

bilita tion outside

of prison justifie s a

shorte r se nte nc e . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion. Se eUnite d State s v . Ov e rton , 573 F.3d 679, 700 (9th C ir. 2009). Thewithin-Guide line s se nte n c e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

se c tion 3553(a

) fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um s ta

nc e s, inc luding these riousne ss of theoffe n se . Se eUnite d State s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba nc ). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 3 0 1 2 2 2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         IN MEMORY OF LES ASPIN

  (Ms. HARMAN asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. HARMAN. Mr. Speaker, ``Harman, how ya' doing?''
  That was Les Aspin's upbeat greeting each time we spoke.
  His tennis game was not much, but he sure was.
  Loyal always to his beloved Wisconsin. A man who loved the House and 
excelled at the legislative function. A big thinker on defense issues 
who probably contributed more to conceptualizing our modern defense 
policy than anyone else. And a true friend.
  He was certainly there for me as I laid my plans to run for public 
office for the first time in my middle age.
  He helped me strategize, he reviewed issues, he gave me credibility, 
and he personally came to California to campaign for me.
  After I won, he was there for counsel. And I tried to be there for 
him too in some tough times.
  Through it all, he was upbeat. Scarcely a week after his pacemaker 
was inserted in 1993, Defense Secretary Aspin testified for a marathon 
10 hours before his beloved House Armed Services Committee. Near the 
end, this freshman was temporarily in the chair. When he saw me, he 
laughed. ``Oh,'' he said, ``when they said there was reform up here, I 
had no idea it would go this far!''
  Aspin, I will miss you.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 30, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-198752) of Smart Trust,
Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 3.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


October 30, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55698-55699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22791]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-142800-09]
RIN 1545-BI96


Guidance Regarding Deferred Discharge of Indebtedness Income of 
Corporations and Deferred Original Issue Discount Deductions; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference 
to temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-142800-09) 
that was published in the Federal Register on Friday, August 13, 2010 
(75 FR 49428) primarily affecting C corporations regarding the 
acceleration of deferred discharge of indebtedness (COD) income 
(deferred COD income) and deferred original issue discount (OID) 
deductions (deferred OID deductions) under section 108(i)(5)(D), and 
the calculation of earnings and profits as a result of an election 
under section 108(i). In addition, these regulations provide rules 
applicable to all taxpayers regarding deferred OID deductions under 
section 108(i) as a result of a reacquisition of an applicable debt 
instrument by an issuer or related party.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, 
Robert M. Rhyne, (202) 622-7790 and Rubin B. Ranat, (202) 622-7530 (not 
toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 55699]]

Background

    The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under 
section 108 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference 
to temporary regulations (REG-142800-09) contains an error that may 
prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking 
by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-142800-09), which was 
the subject of FR Doc. 2010-20059, is corrected as follows:
    On page 49429, column 2, in the authority citation for part 1, the 
language ``Section 1.108(i)-0T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 108(i)(7). * 
* *'' is removed and the language ``Section 1.108(i)-0T also issued 
under 26 U.S.C. 108(i)(7) and 1502. * * *'' is added in its place.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-22791 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6462]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. CHAFEE (for himself and Mr. Pell):
       S. 786. A bill to designate the United States Post Office 
     building located at 24 Corliss Street, Providence, Rhode 
     Island, as the ``Harry Kizirian Post Office Building'', and 
     for other purposes; to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
           By Mr. BURNS:
       S. 787. A bill to provide an exemption from certain 
     hazardous material transporation regulations for small cargo 
     tank vehicles with a capacity of not more than 3,500 gallons 
     that transport petroleum, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
       S. 788. A bill to delay the effective date of trucking 
     deregulation under the Federal Aviation Administration 
     Authorization Act of 1994; to the Committee on Commerce, 
     Science, and Transportation.
           By Mr. CHAFEE (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Kyl):
       S. 789. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to make permanent the section 170(e)(5) rules pertaining to 
     gifts of publicly-traded stock to certain private 
     foundations, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     Finance.
     

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 6 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 6

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 
   the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. 
                                 Valeo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

  Ms. Kaptur submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 
   the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. 
                                 Valeo.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 
the First Amendment to the Constitution in its decision in the 1976 
case of Buckley v. Valeo because--
            (1) the decision failed to recognize that the unlimited 
        spending of large amounts of money on elections has a corrosive 
        effect on the electoral process not simply because of direct 
        transactions between those who give large amounts of money and 
        candidates and elected officials but because the presence of 
        unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process on a more 
        fundamental level; and
            (2) the decision failed to recognize other legitimate state 
        interests which justify limiting money in campaigns, including 
        the need to preserve the integrity of our republican form of 
        government, restore public confidence in government, and ensure 
        all citizens a more equal opportunity to participate in the 
        political process.
                                 <all>
```
f^H^iiw^BP lirtji** J-f*PJ>*Safi*«iBf^*;"«f««C «ri;fes^^s*^*#j^j)iijiiai'. W^'-'i •-'.• '-.". t- .- ,- .,, ... ..-..,,;,. ^ w 

## .. . -- ,-v,~,**■♦fW^jSai*^*'"** *»'•» -'• 1f,-^l -'^

:^;>^^«4-«i><m**^^-V~-..**,*«.*««-,.*ft-,^...,,-.-.;. ,-«,?>'>

*.;w*(*W^W^rtsWStA^if ***••♦** jfpWt, • - • irt* *tvt-*** •*.••**t*'-o' 

## "sTM"-**;/- 

# _iL_TM

•w*i,»'*'v»»**«i,*;r ^rwt****W'»iv*«*wW' 

# |v^ |"5~-SM^cV 14th COURT OP APPEALS,,, ...v**^

• Wbp.?& -*** ^^r^^-v^f!;^-'^'***^* ;*#**ji*!*"' •*«»"*'' >*i,-to«>t^;4Sri*i-'Wli'

- .*v-'*.-rji- j'ctWrtV' *S*u.»i« ••• *«; -m.*^;). wlfWt •V*-^^**w..w*S'•***•--* ;v^**«^»« •;!•*!£«£(.•

'•- .-i->!H««ww.arF«i>U^,-, 

### vC^V^^iia^iMi&ii^ ';" * JMISf*«"«^:*'*iMir4^J^1(ji^^',.^»-^i>:*;^>^?^^^ ;,f, -,v • .i •^v*,WW"*«'*** .*'J *„.» w" tt>J£rT« M*M4v^»>^i*,f4 

# ,^/ fc/ aw..J*#i4-$&.$../^&&^^

*-»^Jj5i^*.-.' - .v ,-wtr^Hi.'^V^-," *.-*,** .V„«;W(, «li I* *,-.tfw.,j,.t fJUS&k ijYjJ^J,1^*1 wVifMl"^^*^i,li t..^,;-.'.^,..^'*-,*.'-*^ **••••!fl'pn;t«)p,'>^-*!sil*l"

it>*ij#im.-&x&*t -,£<wy'it&* i*>-»;* fnn&s-jt- j*-v '-"--Ji«««-( ^-*".*~-7^»^.-^:i«»H iypilttj£t£*0»- -#i(iHM«/(& »*i- 

# ,/i??2#,. ^ -Tfc'ii* '***.*?V.* j*i4W-«r3!TMi<, f«sV«i^ji*"«»i^'^'^^^w^^ff^.V,'::'' -*.**-^.'-p-y -v="s 

# ,,2',. „x£.~~4k^>*2£8~J ;• • 1 -<•'«.-', \.- ,'>.>&>'.v, 

# >*Ljt%Z*^%&t2%&6. -.-iC'S"^- <:.-.-'.•-,-. T'-;; •»^^j^^>,v^.*-'*-^:-*?i^?^^"'^'''^4.'Vi^f> l5".?S*«..~',H't>k-aj.i./ wj^,i$r£ki,'i«'t*a»***-"*"'4 ?,^.-r1v^ 4S/•j*j!>.*^"if*t-'»'*"-»s!-j. v'-S*'»•;. -fc-'r-. 

# ^Jfc^.^jCjfa^r.^U. •M-^t^^lnjf^tf,! -*\ 4-Ji *Jir*v^.l 'V-4*/t^0>*rM-*4>'l'"* ^.j^rf-'.- -*i-»'»f«.^i-**a(>^is*?*i\« i^flf^&ft'^V%)f*J^^*w-**^^^ SiW^^-fliJ^i^.W***^^^ ^l).^-«?#-J---rCv. •'^ifcl't-.fc f*ty'J*Wi:^7. trr •:*"" £*?* tfj*'.'i'-1* '" A1"-' 

### vw*m^&^iji^<^i-*fr4Wi'^&i^^^ 

# Of. fr.*-*'*^4fo&#*i&^J*tiS^#W

# 7> JL, &6U&., s?t6 /ie^Z^As^t ' /&< d, ^AoMe. 

# # ^ jaa. 

# //' 7<V# /^n^t^^L jZ^2&k&£<z, 04j£ &n. £1 CtfTL&ttel&iroC <

C^tl6L

J

# Jk-Jdu. \L 

# w^^tf^; /lLmz* &ku*iftf; tJefa^ <ZL> 

# Jf\ J/s. -A/*h*vl4& &nA&hd% A^a/ ^tZtoagg&L. <' ..&**&*>../&**£._ .Zferfd**^p*xs^-ZE. /fSJ&Al *4y^ toC^ <At+.aZ6y&#y, j&< .^^^^y'<y\// •ji^

# A .Us. ft. OtM > St. " 3. /ftJadft /%&LidtM2& 

# •^yy^//^f/ ^ ^ ^>-- &J!&> /52- /i/)y $ /3y, />^3 yyJyfZ~ 

# -frf/L -^4006*4 sdd&fciH&tiA /ZJS y^C ^^fV"/^^^/^ 

# x^^^^^^^x^^^r

...JL'lUtJ'lWWWB ••a-JHB^-JJPHi-'"" 

# -£.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Force generating military training leaders at Keesler AFB inspire future force

              - Published  Dec. 19, 2020
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Holly Cook                                                    
              - 81st Training Wing Public Affairs

**KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE, Miss. (AFNS) --  **
A military training leader transitions graduates of the Air Force’s **basic military training** and equips them with a better understanding of the operational Air Force. MTLs are force generators and the first link in the chain of command for Airmen in technical training. They are responsible for shaping the future of the Air Force every day.“We’re using the term force generators to describe the work being done by our recruiters, military training instructors and MTLs,” said **Chief Master Sgt. Erik Thompson**, command chief of **Air Education and Training Command**. “Force generation is exactly their charge during their assignments at technical training. Their contribution in laying the foundation for tomorrow’s American Airmen and Space Professionals at Keesler (AFB) is priceless.”Thompson visited the **81st Training Group** Dec. 8 and 9 to see Keesler AFB MTLs in action and to visit the MTL technical training school. There, he witnessed how Keesler AFB MTLs are working to create a better bridge for Airmen development as they move from BMT, through technical school and onto the operational Air Force.“MTLs are the connective tissue between the strict structure at BMT and the more academic environment at technical training,” Thompson said. “They are the critical link between the two and they ensure these newly-minted Airmen are upholding the standards instilled in them at BMT.”During the visit, Thompson also saw how members of the 81st TRG continue to grow the MTL corps during the special duty assignment, and invest in MTLs’ futures.“We want to borrow the best NCOs for three years to train the future force,” Thompson said. “But in doing so, we must ensure that once they have completed their special duty assignment, they are better leaders and Airmen than when they came to us. When examining the life cycle of the MTL, we must focus on four areas: assessing, on-boarding, developing and preparing re-entry to their Air Force specialty code. By focusing on these four areas, MTLs will walk away better leaders because of this assignment and will ensure that top-quality Airmen are selected to train and educate the next generation of Airmen.”Keesler AFB is home to the Air Force’s only MTL schoolhouse.“Keesler (AFB) stepped up to take on several initiatives this year to better our Air Force,” Thompson said. “From housing BMT to ramping up how we teach and prepare our MTLs to be force generators, our Airmen here have helped create the mold for a better dynamic of leaders who are critical to keeping our mission going.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAETCMTLmilitary training leaderCommand ChiefCMSgt Erik ThompsonKeesler AFB81st TRG81st Training Groupbasic military trainingBMTspecial duty assignment
News United States Air Force
 Air Force identifies Boeing E-7 as solution to replace the E-3 capabilityPublished April 26, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Based on market research, the Department of the Air Force has decided to replace a portion of the **E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System** fleet with the E-7 Wedgetail, which is produced by The Boeing Company.
The Boeing E-7 is the only platform capable of meeting the requirements for the Defense Department’s tactical battle management, command and control and moving target indication capabilities within the timeframe needed to replace the aging E-3.
A contract award is planned in fiscal year 2023.
The FY23 President’s Budget request includes $227 million in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation funds starting in FY23. These funds support the acquisition of a rapid prototype aircraft planned to deliver in FY27.
The notional schedule plans for a second rapid prototype aircraft funded in FY24, and a production decision in FY25 to continue fielding aircraft.
The FY23 PB proposes a partial divestment of the E-3 AWACS fleet, 15 of 31 aircraft, and redirects funding to procure and field its replacement.
The E-7 system was developed by Australia for the Australian Defence Forces. The unbreakable U.S. and Australia alliance and interoperability amongst the armed services enabled the Department of the Air Force to leverage this considerable investment and exceptional capability.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Boeing 



E-7 Wedgetail 



E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System 



AWACS 



FY23 Presidential Budget 



Australia 



Australian Defense Forces