alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Moody selected as preferred alternative for potential stateside Afghan training location

              - Published  June 26, 2014

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
Air Force officials announced June 25, Moody Air Force Base, Ga, was selected as the preferred alternative for the A-29 potential stateside Afghan training location, with Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, and Shaw Air Force Base, SC, being reasonable alternatives.

 

The U.S. Air Force followed its formal basing process to determine the most suitable location for a contingent of 20 A-29 aircraft for use in Afghan Air Force pilot and maintenance training.  

 

The Department of the Air Force will purchase the aircraft for the Afghan Air Force, on behalf of Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, using the Department of Defense's Afghanistan Security Forces Fund appropriation.

 

According to DoD officials, the plan to implement this temporary stateside training option will ensure the Afghan Air Force receives the support and training necessary to safely and effectively employ a platform for conducting air interdiction and close air support operations within their country.

 

Moody was chosen as the preferred alternative, following site surveys conducted by the Air Force at three candidate bases. The installations were evaluated on a range of operational and infrastructure requirements and, upon completion of an environmental analysis, a final basing decision will be made.   

 

"Moody AFB was selected as the preferred alternative because the airfield and airspace are available without disruption during the required timeframe, and suitable facilities are immediately available for the new occupants to move into," said Timothy K. Bridges, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air

Force for Installations. "Moody AFB is the lowest cost option." 

 

The A-29 is a multi-role, fixed wing aircraft that provides the Afghan Air Force with an indigenous air interdiction, close air support capability, and aerial reconnaissance capabilities to support the country's counter insurgency operations. It is designed to operate in extremely rugged

terrain, and provides an ideal capability for this air force.

 

The provision of the A-29 Light Air Support program will increase the Afghan Air Force's capacity in airborne self-defense for its government and citizens.

 

The DoD has determined a stateside training option is the most feasible to deliver capability to the Afghan Air Force. Under current plans, the A-29 may arrive at the host base as early as September 2014 for initial cadre training, but the first Afghan trainees are expected to begin training in February 2015.  

 

All aircraft are planned to be provided to the Afghan Air Force following this training.  The initial proposed commitment for this training mission entails a limited presence at the base from 2014 into 2018.

 

 

alternate trainingMoody AFBAfghan air force
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-24-00185-CR

No. 02-24-00186-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 396th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 1798140, 1799933

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JESUS RAMIREZROSALES, Appellant

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jesus Ramirezrosales attempts to appeal his two convictions, but he 

waived his right to appeal in each case as part of his plea bargains with the State.

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only[] (A) those matters that 

were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial

court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized 

by statute.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. The 

trial court must file a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal, clarifying whether 

the case involved a plea bargain and the defendant waived his right to appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

Appellant’s judgments of conviction reflect that, in both of his cases, he 

pleaded guilty and the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the “Terms of 

[his] Plea Bargain.” The plea-bargain paperwork accompanying these judgments—

paperwork that was signed by both Appellant and his trial counsel—further confirms 

that Appellant “waive[d] all rights of appeal.” And the trial court’s certifications show 

this as well, stating that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal” and that the 

cases are “plea-bargain case[s], and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See id. 

Because a criminal appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record,” Tex. R. App. 

P. 25.2(d), we warned Appellant via letter that we would dismiss his appeals unless, 
3 

within ten days, he showed grounds for continuing them.

1

 See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d), 44.3. We received no response. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals based on the trial court’s certifications. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

 /s/ Wade Birdwell

Wade Birdwell

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: August 1, 2024

1

Our initial letter to Appellant was returned to us, so we obtained updated

contact information for him and re-sent the letter to his new address. More than a 

month has passed since we sent the second letter, and it has not been returned.
#### John A. Montgomery v. E. J. Brown et al.

(No. 1634, Op. Book No. 3, p. 756.)

Appeal from Hays County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1303. *Separate property of wife; mutations of.*It matters not how many mutations the separate money of the wife may have undergone; how often it has been invested in personal or real property; how often it has been loaned, collected and reinvested; as long as the substance thereof can be traced and identified as the result of the money, it is her separate property.

§ 1304. *Married women; right to own property.*The law imposes no restrictions upon the right of the wife to own property. Her right in this respect, in this state, is as absolute as that of her husband. And it is a mistaken *756idea to suppose that every transaction between husband and wife, with respect to property, must be denounced as fraudulent.

§ 1305. *Homestead; proceeds of sale of.*Creditors have no interest in the homestead of a debtor, and any agreement made between husband wife with respect to the proceeds of the sale of the same, which did not affect other property subject to ezecution, would be valid as against creditors.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6765]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, for the information of all Senators, 
tomorrow morning the Senate will begin consideration of the Whitewater 
resolution under a 2-hour time limitation. It may also be the intention 
of the majority leader to turn to the consideration of H.R. 483, the 
Medicare select bill. Senators should, therefore, be aware that 
rollcall votes can be expected throughout the day on Wednesday.

                          ____________________
```
#### J. D. Nicholson v. Fred Ende.

(No. —, Op. Book No. 1, p. 162.)

Error from Hunt County.

November 13, 1876.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 496. *Remittitur after writ of error sued out; effect of.*The judgment was excessive. Defendant filed his petition and bond for writ of error, but, before the transcript was obtained, the plaintiff in the judgment filed in the record a *remittitur*of the excess of the judgment, and this was incorporated in the record sent up. If such a *remittitur*had been filed in this cause before the defendant had filed his petition and given bond for writ of error, he would have had no necessity or cause to have taken the case to the appellate court; but as this was not done until after the defendant had been compelled to take steps onerous in their nature to obtain what was then his rightful remedy, he should not now be taxed with the costs for perfecting his writ of error. [Chrisman v. Davenport, 21 Tex. 483.]

Reformed and rendered.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING DANIEL S. MOHAN, HERO OF THE YEAR

  Mr. ASHCROFT. Mr. President, today I rise to honor a Missourian who 
has distinguished himself through his bravery beyond the call of duty 
and earned the National Association of Letter Carriers' Central Region 
Hero of the Year Award. Daniel S. Mohan is a letter carrier from St. 
Claire, MO, who took actions well beyond trudging through rain, sleet, 
snow, and dark of night to complete his appointed rounds.
  Daniel Mohan was driving on his postal route in St. Claire when he 
heard shots. Soon after, a woman ran screaming from her house and fell 
wounded on her driveway, the victim of three gunshot wounds, including 
one to the face. Mr. Mohan raced from his truck and pulled the victim 
to safety behind his postal vehicle located across the street as her 
assailant was coming out of the house in pursuit. Daniel's presence at 
the scene discouraged the gunman who returned to the house and 
surrendered to authorities soon after. The victim of the shooting was 
later treated at a local hospital's intensive care unit, and continues 
to undergo reconstructive surgery. But as Tom Yoder, Police Chief of 
Saint Claire acknowledged, this women would not be alive if not for the 
valiant efforts of Daniel Mohan.
  For his efforts, Daniel Mohan has been honored by the National 
Association of Letter Carriers as its Central Region Hero of the Year. 
In a time when we hear of events of violence going on in public view 
without a single person acting to stop egregious actions, Daniel 
Mohan's bravery and self-sacrifice is truly a model to be followed.
  Edmund Burke said, ``The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil 
is for good men to do nothing.'' Mr. President, it is my hope that the 
heroic actions of this Missourian would become the norm, not the 
exception when we speak of how we as Americans should act toward our 
neighbors.

                          ____________________
```
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

the President to disapprove or reduce items of appropriation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2007 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following joint resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States authorizing the President to disapprove or reduce 

items of appropriation. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 63 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘The President may reduce or disapprove any item 

3 of appropriation in any Act or joint resolution, except any 

4 item of appropriation for the legislative branch of the Gov5 ernment. If an Act or joint resolution is approved by the 

6 President, any item of appropriation contained therein 

7 which is not reduced or disapproved shall become law. The 

8 President shall return with his objections any item of ap9 propriation reduced or disapproved to the House in which 

10 the Act or joint resolution containing such item originated. 

11 The Congress may, in the manner prescribed under sec12 tion 7 of the article I for Acts disapproved by the Presi13 dent, reconsider any item disapproved or reduced under 

14 this article, except that only a majority vote of each House 

15 shall be required to approve an item which has been dis16 approved or to restore an item which has been reduced 

17 by the President to the original amount contained in the 

18 Act or joint resolution.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 99.7



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Andrew Patient, Chief Financial Officer
of Merus Labs International Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (the
“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Andrew
    Patient 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Andrew Patient         
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | December 29, 2015
News United States Air Force
 Special Tactics Airman fatal training mishapPublished Feb. 26, 2014
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                An Air Force Special Tactics Airman died Feb. 21, during a free fall proficiency training in Eloy, Ariz. The cause of the accident is under investigation.Master Sgt. Josh Gavulic was a tactical air control party member assigned to the 17th Special Tactics Squadron at Fort Benning, Ga. He was a 16-year veteran with 10 deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan where he earned three Bronze Star Medals, two Air Force Commendation Medals, two Joint Service Commendation Medals with Valor and an Army Commendation Medal."Joshua was a tender warrior -- fierce on the battlefield, a consummate professional whose commitment to his team was only surpassed by his love and commitment to his wife Alyssa and their wonderful children," said Lt. Col. John Traxler, the 17th Special Tactics Squadron commander.Gavulic is survived by his wife and six children."We talked frequently of the responsibilities we hold as husbands and fathers," Traxler said. "Those were the roles he held most dear. I loved him for that and he personified qualities that I strive for."Gavulic was an Airman, a TACP, a Special Tactics operator and a Ranger. He was driven by an intrinsic desire to serve his God, his family and his country, Traxler said.Air Force Special Operations Command TACPs with the 17 STS conduct joint special operations and are trained in multiple types of infiltration techniques including parachute operations. Gavulic was a qualified jumpmaster and an expert in planning and controlling air combat resources for joint operations. He was also proficient in operating and supervising communications networks to support ground maneuver elements. TACPs can be attached to Navy SEALs and Army Special Forces and Ranger units and possess the joint terminal attack control qualification to call in close air support from fighter jets, attack helicopters, gunships, artillery and naval surface fire."The 17th Special Tactics community should be focused on the wealth of things that he taught us through his work, his home life, and his actions: living our lives in a manner worthy of his legacy and his values," Traxler said.(Information courtesy of the 24th Special Operations Wing Public Affairs)TACP
#### ANNE HEALEY v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 31, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-0449 Lower Tribunal No. F97-36875

________________ 

### Judge Brandon, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge. Judge Brandon, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Larry K. Hinson, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Larrry  K.  Hinson
-----------------------------------
Larry K. Hinson,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
February 17, 2004


     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Rockport  Healthcare  Group,  Inc.  and  will be retained by
Rockport  Healthcare  Group,  Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, the Chief Financial Officer of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the registrant), certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of the registrant;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|Date:  March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Michael E. Haylon         
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                      |  | Name:
Michael E. Haylon       
|                      |  | Title:
Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRED J. LOVETT.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.