alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40879 Summary Calendar

DOROTHY BEAMER, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERRY POWELL, Dep’t of Public Safety Officer, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-803

- - - - - - - - - - June 30, 1997 Before DAVIS, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Texas Department of Public Safety Trooper Jerry Powell appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment based on qualified and official immunity in Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The denial of summary judgment generally is not an appealable order. Aldy v. Valmet Paper Mach. , 74 F.3d 72, 75No. 96-40879 - 2 - (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 68 (1997). Denial of summary judgment in the context of qualified immunity is appealable to the extent that it turns on an issue of law. Johnson v. Jones , 115 S. Ct. 2151, 2155 (1995). This court does not have appellate jurisdiction over the district court’s denial of Powell’s motion for summary judgment because there is a “significant fact-related dispute,” namely whether Powell acted reasonably in arresting Beamer. See Hale v. Townley , 45 F.3d 914, 918-919 (5th Cir. 1995).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin DeFrank,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kings Road
Entertainment, Inc., and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  July 15, 2004                            /s/ Geraldine Blecker
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: Geraldine Blecker
                                                Its:  Chief Executive Officer



Date:  July 15, 2004                            /s/ H. Martin DeFrank
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: H. Martin DeFrank
                                                Its:  Chief Financial Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 439 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national 

celebration of after-school programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2008 

Mrs. LOWEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, 

a national celebration of after-school programs. 

Whereas high-quality after-school programs provide safe, 

challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences to 

help children and youth develop their social, emotional, 

physical, cultural and academic skills; 

Whereas high-quality after-school programs support working 

families by ensuring that their children are safe and productive after the regular school day ends; 

Whereas high-quality after-school programs build strong communities by involving the Nation’s students, parents, 

business leaders, and adult volunteers in the lives of the 

Nation’s young people, thereby promoting positive relationships among children, youth, families, and adults; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HCON 439 IH 

Whereas high-quality after-school programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of the Nation’s children; 

Whereas ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration of 

after-school programs on October 16, 2008, promotes the 

critical importance of high-quality after-school programs 

in the lives of children, their families, and their communities; 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children have parents who 

work outside the home, and 14,300,000 children have no 

place to go after school; and 

Whereas many after-school programs are struggling to keep 

their doors open and their lights on: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress supports the goals and 

3 ideals of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration 

4 of after-school programs. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force mourns 5th CMSAF passing 

              - Published  Jan. 17, 2024
              - Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **
**Robert D. Gaylor**, the fifth Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force, **passed away** Jan. 17, at the age of 93.Gaylor’s career spanned nearly 31 years, leaving a legacy of service, leadership and dedication."CMSAF Gaylor was a pillar of our Air Force,” said Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force **JoAnne S. Bass**. “For more than 75 years, both in uniform and after he retired, he served our Airmen and the institution he loved so dearly. He will be deeply missed by all.”
Robert D. Gaylor, the fifth Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force, passed away Jan. 17, 2024, at the age of 93. Among his numerous achievements as CMSAF, he played a significant role in the creation of the Air Force’s new maternity uniform and pushed for a policy change allowing junior enlisted Airmen undergoing a permanent change of station to transport their families at the government’s expense. (U.S. Air Force photo)
Photo Details /                Download Hi-ResGaylor was selected as the Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force on Aug. 1, 1977. In this role, he served as the senior enlisted advisor to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the most senior noncommissioned officer in the Air Force. He represented the interests of enlisted Airmen at the highest levels of the service and played a key role in shaping Air Force policies.Among his numerous achievements as CMSAF, he played a significant role in the creation of the Air Force’s new maternity uniform and pushed for a policy change allowing junior enlisted Airmen undergoing a permanent change of station to transport their families at the government’s expense.Gaylor enlisted in the Air Force in 1948, at a time when the service was still in its infancy. He began his career in the security police, continued to serve in a variety of assignments, including in Korea, Japan and Vietnam. He also served as an instructor at the Second Air Force Noncommissioned Officer Academy at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, assisted in reopening the then-Strategic Air Command NCO Academy, and established the U.S. Air Forces in Europe Command Management and Leadership Center.Following his retirement in 1979, Gaylor never wavered in his commitment to the Air Force community, remaining actively involved with Airmen and their families through organizations, like the Air Force Memorial Foundation and the Air Force Sergeants Association. He continued to meet with Airmen for the remainder of his life, advocating tirelessly for the well-being and professional development of those who served.U.S. Air Force Logo

FSUSAFAFAir ForceCMSAFfifth CMSAFpassingChief Master Sergeant of the Air ForceRobert D. GaylorServiceleadershipdedication

#             Related Links        

-  Condolences on the Passing of CMSAF 5
#### Johnson & Brien v. H. L. Doss.

(No. 1966, Op. Book No. 2, p. 335.)

Appeal from Young County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

1075. *Evidence; proof of title in suit for rent.*Appellants sued appellee for the rent of land which he had leased from one Gooden, which land appellants had purchased at execution sale against Gooden, subsequent to the loase. On the trial, appellants offered in evidence to prove their right to the rents, the judgment against Gooden, execution thereon and sale thereunder, and the sheriff’s deed to them. This evidence was rejected by the court, on the ground that it raised the question of title to the land. Held, the court erred in rejecting this evidence. This action was not a suit for the recovery of land or the possession of it, or to try title to it. The only matter in controversy was whether Doss was indebted to Johnson & Brien for the rent of it, and to establish that fact the testimony was material and competent. If Doss had not rented the premises from appellants; if he held the same under a lease from Gooden, and had not attorned to them, it was necessary for them to prove that they had succeeded to Gooden’s right, and this they might well do by the evidence offered by them and rejected by the court.

*608May 25, 1881.

§ 1076. *Bent; to whom payable, where premises are sold during term of lease.*The sale of the land under execution carried with it all the rent becoming due subsequent to the transfer. [16 Miss. 41; 5 Paige’s Ch. 633; 3 Kent, 469, 470; 8 Paige, 392; 3 Watts, 394; 4 N. Y. 270; Camley v. Stanfield, 10 Tex. 548; Andrews v. Richardson, 21 Tex. 287; Shultz v. Spreain, *ante,*sec. 917.] It vested in the purchasers all the rights and interest in the land which Gooden then had, of whatever character they might be.

§ 1077. *Depositions; affidavit.*The act of 1879 [Acts 16th Leg. p. 126] modified article 2234, R. S., so as to dispense with necessity of an affidavit to render admissible the deposition of a witness. [Note. — The editors call attention to the fact that article 2234, R. 8., above referred to, has been repealed by act 17th Leg., Pamp. Laws, p. 18.]

Reversed and remanded.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7419

JIMMIE NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusBERKELEY COUNTY; JAMES H. ROZIER, JR., Berkeley County Supervisor, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-713-2-18AJ) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmie Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Appellant's previously filed interlocutory appeal of the district court's September 26, 1994, denial of his motion to amend his complaint is ripe at this juncture. 2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint, * and its final order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Berkeley County , No. CA-94-713-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 1994; July 18, 1996). We note that Appellant filed this appeal after the effective date of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"); because Appellant no longer is incarcerated, the PLRA requirements do not apply to him,and we overrule Appellees' objection to Appellant proceeding without prepayment of filing fees and costs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5606]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED

  By unanimous consent, permission to address the House, following the 
legislative program and any special orders heretofore entered, was 
granted to:
  (The following Member (at the request of Mr. Dornan) to revise and 
extend his remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Hoke, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. McNulty) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Ms. Kaptur, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Owens, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Martinez, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. LaFalce, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Member (at his own request) to revise and extend his 
remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Ramstad, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Member (at the request of Mr. Skaggs) to revise and 
extend his remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Fattah, for 5 minutes, today.
  Ms. Kaptur, for 5 minutes, today, at her own request.

                          ____________________
```
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 69 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 

2008, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Public Law 110–92 is further amended by striking 
2 

•HJ 69 EH 

1 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘Decem2 ber 21, 2007’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 69 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.
#### ARTHUR Z. KAMIN v. LEON SMOCK.

February 6, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### SAM MILLER BAG COMPANY, Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC., Appellee.

No. 80-1571.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 1981.

Decided March 3, 1981.

John D. Boelter, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee Burlington Northern, Inc.

Maslon, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty, Marcy S. Wallace and Thomas H. Borman, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

Before ROSS, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sam Miller Bag Company brought suit against Burlington Northern, Inc. under the Interstate Commerce Act to recover the value of four cut, fold and print presses which were damaged during interstate shipment. Purchase price of the presses was $3,000. Sam Miller Bag contended at trial that the purchase price was'the result of a distress sale and that the actual value of the presses at the time they were damaged was $60,000. The district court found in favor of Sam Miller Bag and determined the value of the presses to be $12,000. Sam Miller Bag appeals.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in its factual finding of value. Findings of fact by the district court are entitled to great weight *608and must be accepted unless shown to be clearly erroneous. *Werner v. United States Dept. of Interior,*581 F.2d 168, 171 (8th Cir. 1978). The burden of demonstrating the court’s error falls on the complaining party, *Snodgrass v. Nelson,*503 F.2d 94, 96 (8th Cir. 1974). This burden is especially strong where the district court’s findings are primarily based on oral testimony and the trial judge has viewed the demeanor and credibility of the witnesses. *United States v. Dochterman,*630 F.2d 652, 653 (8th Cir. 1980); *Snodgrass v. Nelson, supra,*503 F.2d at 96. Sam Miller Bag has not met this burden on appeal. A careful review of the evidence shows substantial testimony in support of the trial court’s valuation. We conclude that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is affirmed. *See*Rule 14 of the Rules of this court.
H. Con. Res. 62 Agreed to May 16, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas research shows that spending time together as a family 

is critical to raising strong and resilient kids;

Whereas strong healthy families improve the quality of life and 

the development of children;

Whereas it is essential to celebrate and reflect upon the important 

role that all families play in the lives of children and their 

positive effect for the Nation’s future;

Whereas the fourth Saturday of June is a day set aside to recognize 

the importance of children and families; and

Whereas the country’s greatest natural resource is its children: 

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideals of a National 

Children and Families Day. 

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                   RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.'S REVERSE STOCK
                             SPLIT BECOMES EFFECTIVE

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, MARCH 15, 1999 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) stated that the previously announced one-for-three reverse stock
split of the Company's common stock became effective today. Stockholders of
record will shortly receive letters of transmittal from the Company's transfer
agent explaining the procedures to obtain new stock certificates reflecting the
reverse stock split.

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading provider and manager of education and
treatment services for at-risk and troubled youth. The Company serves over 2,300
youth through schools, residential treatment facilities, group homes and service
contracts in 8 states and Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information.




Contact:   Isa Diaz
           Vice President Corporate Relations
          (305) 569-4626
#### Western Electric Manufacturing Co. v. L. E. Curtis et al.

(No. 554, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 533.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

March 15, 1879.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 729. *Foreign corporation; proof of incorporation.*Where a foreign corporation offered to prove its corporate capacity by the production of a copy of the general law providing for the formation of such corporations as that of the plaintiffs, passed by the general assembly of Illinois, entitled “An act to authorize the formation of corporations for manufacturing, mining, mechanical or chemical purposes,” which was certified by the secretary of state of the state Illinois, under the great seal of state, to be a true copy of an enrolled law of the state of Illinois, giving title and date of approval, which evidence was excluded by the court, *held*error. The document was properly authenticated, and was admissible as evidence; and so, also, of the certificate of organization.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Vendalux Corporation.

By: /s/
   -----------------------------
Name: Tom Hofer
Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.