alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. L. McArnis v. E. C. McIntyre and W. H. Kennedy.

(No. —, Op. Book No. 1, p. 293.)

Appeal from Delta County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 513. *Exempt property; lumber to build residence is exempt from forced sale.*Appellant had purchased a Hact of unimproved land, which he designed to make his homestead. He owned no other land. He purchased lumber with which to erect upon said land a house to reside in. A portion of this lumber he had hauled to a place of safety near the land, and there left it until he could get the balance of his lumber from the mill. Appellee had an execution against appellant, which he caused to be levied upon the lumber which had been hauled *255and left near appellant’s land. Appellant brought this suit to enjoin the sale of the lumber, upon the ground that it was' a part of his homestead, and was therefore exempt property. Upon a hearing of the case, the temporary injunction which had previously been granted was dissolved, and it was adjudged that appellant take nothing by his suit, and pay the costs. *Held,*the lumber bought and intended for erecting a dwelling house, on the site selected by appellant for a homestead, was exempt from forced sale. The petition and evidence showed the time when the land was destined for the future residence of appellant and his family, and the steps taken towards building upon the land, and the reason why he had been prevented from improving and occupying it. The intention to use the lumber in building a dwelling house upon the land to be occupied by him as his residence is evidenced by unmistakable acts. The fact that, at the time the lumber was levied upon, the lumber was not on his land, would not affect the question. [Cobbs v. Coleman, 14 Tex. 594; Anderson v. McKay, 30 Tex. 186; Stone v. Darnell, 20 Tex. 11; Franklin v. Coffee, 18 Tex. 413.]

November 3, 1877.

§ 514. *Proof and judgment must conform to allegations.*The court cannot make up a judgment upon facts not put in issue by the pleadings. The proof must be according to the allegations of the parties, and if it goes beyond the allegations, the court cannot judicially act upon it, as facts not alleged cannot form the basis of a decree. [Denison v. League, 16 Tex. 406; Wright v. Wright, 3 Tex. 168; Hall v. Jackson, id. 309; Guess v. Lubbock, 5 Tex. 535; Chrisman v. Miller, 15 Tex. 160; 9 Peters, 483.]

Eeversed and remanded.
Subsidiaries of the
Registrant

|Subsidiary                    |          | Jurisdiction of
  Formation
|----------------------------- | -------- | ---------------------------
|ZAIS Financial Partners, L.P. | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZAIS Financial, LLC           | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZAIS Asset I, LLC             | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZAIS Asset II, LLC            | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZAIS Asset III, LLC           | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZAIS Asset IV, LLC            | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZAIS I TRS, Inc.              | Delaware
|                              |         
|ZFC
      Trust               | Maryland
|                              |         
|ZFC
      Trust TRS I, LLC    | Delaware

---
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Microbics, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Conrad Nagel
---------------------------
Conrad Nagel
August 19, 2002
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00466-CR

Scott Ralph WHEELOCK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B18291

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. Wheelock’s “Motion for Affirmance with Damages” is DENIED.

SIGNED September 23, 2020.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### GEORGE HART v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 24277-0-II.

Division Two.

April 28, 2000.]

#### Jackson Mutual Life Insurance Company, *Appellant,*v. David E. Petersen, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 97-2-04753-0, Robert L. Harris, J., entered December 28, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Hunt, J.
**Exhibit99.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Cameron Shippit, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of RESAAS Services Inc.;

2.            Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

3.            [intentionallyomitted];

4.            Theissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

(d)          Disclosedin this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.            Theissuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

(b)          Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 3

To improve education and provide all students in the United States with 
                      the opportunity to succeed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2013

    Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Murray, Ms. 
   Mikulski, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Coons, Mrs. 
    Gillibrand, Mr. Brown, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
 Menendez, Ms. Cantwell, and Mr. Levin) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve education and provide all students in the United States with 
                      the opportunity to succeed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthen our Schools and Students 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should--
            (1) strengthen early learning programs to better prepare 
        children for success in school;
            (2) ensure that all students have equitable access to a 
        high-quality, well-rounded education that prepares them to 
        succeed in college and a career;
            (3) build on recent efforts to continue to make higher 
        education more affordable and to improve access and success for 
        all students;
            (4) provide all teachers with the support they need to 
        ensure student success, including the creation of a new 
        national Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics 
        (STEM) Master Teacher Corps to recognize and help retain STEM 
        teachers and strengthen STEM education in public schools in the 
        United States; and
            (5) support States and local educational agencies to ensure 
        schools have the safe and successful learning conditions in 
        which all students can excel.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**USACOMPRESSION PARTNERS, LP CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of USA Compression Partners, LP (the “Partnership”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph C. Tusa, Jr., as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|                                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.                            |   |
| Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.                                |   |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and   Treasurer |   |
|                                                    |   |
| March 28, 2013                                     |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
SCWC-16-0000071
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

HEALOHA CARMICHAEL, LEZLEY JACINTHO, a nd N Â MOKU AUPUNI O KO # OLAU HUI, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellees/

C ross-Appellants,

vs. BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, SUZANNE CASE, in her official capacity as Chairperson of the Board of Land and Natural Resources, the DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellees/

C ross-Appellants,

and ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC., EAST MAUI IRRIGATION CO., LTD.,

and HAWAIIAN COMMERCIAL AND SUGAR CO., Respondents/Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
and COUNTY OF MAUI, DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY, R espondent/Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000071; 1CC151000650)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.,)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellees/CrossAppellants Healoha Carmichael, Lezley Jacintho, and N â Moku Aupuni O Ko # olau Hui’s application for writ of certiorari filed Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000071 25-NOV-2019 11:37 AMon September 30, 2019, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled

for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 25, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
S6644 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE May 12, 1995

of $300 billion for as far as the eye can

see.

Mr. President, the new Republican

Congress promised to make the tough

decisions. We promised to fight the status quo. We promised to stand for real

change. We promised to balance the

budget. And as this budget proves, we

are keeping our promises.

And make no mistake about it, at

the same time we are balancing the

budget, we will also keep our promise

to provide real tax relief to America’s

families.

Let me close, Mr. President, by warning the American people that in the

coming weeks, President Clinton and

his administration will be trotting out

the same old scare tactics they tried

before last November’s election.

We will hear them say that Republicans are heartless. We will hear them

say that Republicans want to help the

rich, and harm those in need. We will

hear them say that we are targeting

children and seniors. We will see them

throw a lot of rocks at Republicans.

But I am afraid what we will not see

from them is leadership.

While they engage in class warfare,

the Republican Congress will continue

to declare war against the deficit. And

with the support of the American people, it is a war that we will win.

ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 9:30 A.M.,

MONDAY, MAY 15, 1995

fThe PRESIDING OFFICER. Under

the previous order, the Senate stands

in adjournment.

There being no objection, the Senate,

at 4:24 p.m., adjourned until Monday,

May 15, 1995, at 9:30 a.m.
Exhibit 12.1



Certification by the Principal Executive
Officer Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002







I, Hua Zhou, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report
on Form 20-F of Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: June 18, 2020



| |    
| | ---
| | By:
| |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7162

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JESSE EDWARD CAUDILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-93-21, CA-97-525-R)

Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse Edward Caudill, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Caudill, No. CR-93-21; CA-97-525-R

(W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1997). Our decision intimates nothing about the

retroactivity of the one-year limitations period imposed by the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, of 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1997), since Appellant filed this

action over one year after the effective date of the statute. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.36

                  SECOND AMENDMENT TO FIRST EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO FIRST EXCHANGE AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), is
dated as of July 31, 2003 and amends the Exchange Agreement (as amended pursuant
to the Amendment to First Exchange Agreement dated as of May 28, 2003 (the
"First Amendment"), the "First Exchange Agreement"), dated as April 22, 2003,
entered into by and among Diomed Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with
headquarters located at One Dundee Park, Andover, MA 01810 (the "Company"),
Diomed, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company ("Diomed"), each entity named on the signature page hereto as a Note
Purchaser (each, a "Note Purchaser") and Gibralt US, Inc., a Colorado
corporation (the "Designated Note Purchaser"). Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have their respective meanings set forth in the First
Exchange Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

      In consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the First Exchange Agreement
as follows:

      1. Clause (ii) of Section 1(b) of the First Exchange Agreement is hereby
amended by deleting the phrase "July 31, 2003" therein and inserting in lieu of
such phrase "November 15, 2003."

      2. Section 4(i) of the First Exchange Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the phrase "July 31, 2003" therein and inserting in lieu of such phrase
"November 15, 2003."

      3. All other terms and conditions of the First Exchange Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

                            [Signature page follows.]

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the Note
Purchasers, Diomed and the Company as of the date set forth above.

                                        COMPANY:

                                        Diomed Holdings, Inc.

                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                        Name:  James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                        DIOMED:

                                        Diomed, Inc.

                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                        Name:  James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                        NOTE PURCHASER
                                        Gibralt US, Inc.

                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                        Name:  Johnny Ciampi
                                        Title: Authorized Person
Exhibit 35.1



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among GS Mortgage Securities
Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association , as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, and Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, with
respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series GSMS 2011-GC5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### GEORGE HUSS v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE RAMAPO-INDIAN HILLS REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, BERGEN COUNTY.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 44059-4-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard M. Bowman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-05138-4, Sharon S. Armstrong, J., entered January 19, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.