alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 11, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130760 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CHARLES DONALD HILTON, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter- Justices Defendant-Appellant, 

v SC: 130760 

 COA: 257185 

Oakland CC: 2003-050279-CZ 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST 

BLOOMFIELD, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

And Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, 

and 

ELIZABETH HILTON, 

 Third Party Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

MARKMAN, J., concurs and states as follows: 

I concur in the order denying leave to appeal. I write separately only to note that 

the district court’s order in West Bloomfield Twp v Charles Hilton (48th District Court 

Docket No. 98 WB29458C CM) is not altogether clear as to its purpose. However, 

because we must presume that the court acted in a constitutional manner, I presume that 

the district court did not purport to exercise an executive branch function through this 

order by commanding the township to file a nuisance abatement action in circuit court. 

Rather, I presume that the district court merely intended to communicate to the township 

that, if it intended to file such an action, it would have to be filed in the circuit court. 

p0809 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 11, 2006 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from RCPI Trust's
Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2000 and RCPI Trust's Statement of Operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,794
<PP&E>                                         944,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,101,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,421
<BONDS>                                        647,413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     347,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,101,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,831
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,831
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
```

  EX-34.1
(logo) pwc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax
service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2011 and for the year
then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which
the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsib1e for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2011 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 8, 2012

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, TX 75201-2997
T: (214) 999 1400, F: (214) 754 7991, www.pwc.com/us
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             268
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,299
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,055
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,171
<LOANS>                                         14,093
<ALLOWANCE>                                         60
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,013
<DEPOSITS>                                      15,598
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                691
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  23,013
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,182
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  243
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   275
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,700
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 768
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 768
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              932
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    342
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         342
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.77
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        54
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    60
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   60
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                60
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         181,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,500
<INVENTORY>                                    136,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               680,573
<PP&E>                                       1,495,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                 981,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,380,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          763,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,679
<COMMON>                                        13,819
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,380,709
<SALES>                                        494,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               494,009
<CGS>                                          453,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  707,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (227,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (227,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (227,767)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),
Richard S. Gilbert, Chief Executive Officer of Copper Mountain Networks, Inc. (the Company), and Michael O. Staiger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1.    The Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1, (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



2.    The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 4th day of March, 2003.



/s/    RICHARD S.
GILBERTRichard S. GilbertChairman andChief Executive Officer




/s/    MICHAEL O.
STAIGERMichael O. StaigerExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officerand Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,146
<PP&E>                                          10,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,282)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,681
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,537
<SALES>                                         14,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,778
<CGS>                                            9,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                979
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 8 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 8

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the 
limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Serrano introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the 
limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States is hereby repealed.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Samuel White v. G. W. Whaley.

(No. 743, Op. Book No. 3, p. 458.)

Appeal from Maverick County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 101. *Partner; liable as such, when.*Where a person holds himself out as a partner of another, or suffers himself to be held out to the world as such, or so conducts himself in dealings with others as to create' the reasonable belief that he is such partner, he will be held *42liable as such a partner upon an indebtedness induced by the belief that he was such partner, although in fact he was not a partner.

January 26, 1881.

§102. *Proof of liability as a partner.*To prove a party’s liability as partner, it is competent to show any of his acts or declarations from which it might reasonably be concluded that he was such partner.

§ 103. *General reputation, rumor, etc., not competent to prove a partnership.*It is not competent to prove a partnership by general reputation, common rumor, or the opinion or belief of a witness founded on such hearsay testimony. [Abbott’s Trial Ev. 209.]

Reversed and remanded.
#### JAMISON, Appellant, v. UPTEGROVE et al.; JAMISON, Appellant, v. STONE JAMISON, Appellant, v. EVANS; JAMISON, Appellant, v. BLACK.

Division One,

November 23, 1904.

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit *Court.*— Hón. *E. M. Hughes,*Judge.

Affirmed.

MARSHALL, J.

The questions of law, as well as the facts, disclosed by the records in these cases, are exactly similar to those presented in the case of William D. Jamison, appellant, v. Richard Martin, respondent, reported at page 422. of this volume, and it is unnecessary to further consider these cases. The judgments in these cases are affirmed.

All concur, except *Robinson, J.,*absent.
EXHIBIT
10.IIIA18 







 





	To: 	
Jim Brewington 







	From: 	
Henry Schacht 







	Date: 	
March 13, 2001 







	Re: 	
Special Retention Bonus 






 
 
As we continue with our turnaround, it is critical for us to
remain focused and committed to successfully meet our business challenges. I am confident that we can take our company to new levels of success, and I
am counting on your continued commitment as a key player in making this happen. To reward you for your efforts and dedication, the Board has approved a
special retention bonus for you. The amount of the bonus and the payment terms are outlined in the attachment.


This special retention bonus has only been offered to select Officers, so I ask
that you keep the details of this award confidential.


I truly appreciate your efforts and look forward to working together through the
challenges ahead.


 
 
 
 
Attachment











Attachment



Special Retention Bonus
 James Brewington



	
Amount
	
You are eligible to receive a retention bonus in the amount of $1,500,000.
 This award is subject to any application tax and is
non-benefit bearing for purposes of Lucent’s benefit plans. Please note that this award is in addition to any other incentive awards for which you
may be eligible.


	
Payment
 Dates
	
Assuming your continued employment, the following payments will be made:
 •      50% is payable on February 1, 2002

•     50% is payable on December 1, 2002


	
Termination
 Provisions
	
•      In the event you voluntarily resign or are terminated by Lucent for “Cause” prior to the payout date(s), this
award will be cancelled.
 •     In the event of your death or disability prior to the payout date(s), a prorated portion of this award will be
paid to you or your estate.
 •     If you are placed on a Company approved leave of absence under the Officer Severance Policy and you are on
this leave on the scheduled payout date(s), then this award will be paid. Please note that the Officer Severance Policy remains in effect in the event
of a Change in Control (as defined by the 1996 Long Term Incentive Program).
 •     In the event of a Change in Control (as defined by the
1996 Long Term Incentive Program), this award would continue to be paid on the originally scheduled dates assuming your continued
employment.




 



Lucent Technologies Proprietary (Restricted)
Solely for Authorized Persons
Having a Need to Know Pursuant to Company Instructions