alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 AND
AS OF JUNE 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919602
<NAME> HELSINKI CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,297
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,543)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  59
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (59)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (59)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (59)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Air Force improves nuclear force manpower levelsPublished Aug. 7, 2014
                        
                        By Maj. Eric Badger
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force will increase nuclear force manning at Air Force Global Strike Command missile and bomber wings beginning this fall, officials announced Aug. 7.
The Air Force will plus-up nuclear enterprise manning levels by hundreds of positions at select bases, with the first wave of Airmen expected to arrive through the next few assignment cycles.  
As outlined by Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James, the manning plus-up is part of a broader series of measures and incentives designed to improve the culture and mission effectiveness of the service’s nuclear force. 
“We’ve been saying that the nuclear enterprise is the number one mission, and the Air Force is putting its money where its mouth is,” James said. “We must show Airmen that there’s value in this mission by making the appropriate investments in people, weapon systems and infrastructure. The Air Force has worked and will continue to work to identify and rearrange funds to make important improvements within our missile and bomber forces.”
The wholesale changes being made in the nuclear enterprise are designed to empower Airmen, and ensure they have the resources they need for this priority mission, said Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson, the commander of Air Force Global Strike Command. 
“We have great Airmen serving on our team and we owe it to them to make things better,” he said. “It’s important to recognize that we are just at the beginning of this process. Raising manning levels is one in a series of immediate changes.”
The increase in nuclear force manpower by installation is as follows:**Barksdale AFB, Louisiana:**The 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale AFB will gain 31 positions, filling jobs primarily in areas such as maintenance and munitions.  **F.E. Warren AFB, Wyoming:** The 90th Missile Wing and 20th Air Force will gain 242 positions to improve manning primarily in the operations, maintenance and security forces career fields.**Malmstrom AFB, Montana:** The 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom AFB will gain 216 positions to improve manning primarily in the operations, maintenance and security forces career fields.**Minot AFB, North Dakota:** Minot AFB will gain 303 positions.  The 5th Bomb Wing host unit is expected to increase by 69 positions in areas including operations and maintenance.  The 91st Missile Wing will grow by 234 positions.  Those Airmen will primarily serve in jobs such as operations, maintenance and security forces.**Whiteman AFB, Missouri:**The 509th Bomb Wing at Whiteman AFB will gain 56 positions, primarily filling jobs in the maintenance career field.F.E. Warren AFB 



Minot AFB 



SecAF 



Barksdale AFB 



Whiteman AFB 



Malmstrom AFB 



manpower 



nuclear mission
#### John Jackson v. Smith Brooks.

(No. 41, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 81.)

Error from Orange County.

February 12, 1877.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 633. *Writ of error bond which could not give jurisdiction.*The supreme court of this state had no appellate jurisdiction over the case at the time the writ of error was sued out. The writ of error bond was filed September 1, 1876, and was conditioned that “if the said John Jackson shall well and truly prosecute his said writ of error to final judgment in said supreme court upon such writ, and well and truly pay all such damages as may be awarded against him in such cause, then this obligation to be null and void, otherwise of full force and effect,” etc.

Dismissed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENNIS MCCANN.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: August 23, 2004

By:            /s/
   --------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MANAGEMENT





Exhibit 10.4



FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MANAGEMENT

AND TECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

CROWN RESOURCES CORP. OF COLORADO AND 

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION DATED JANUARY 1, 1994



Dated March 25, 1999



 

Whereas the Company and Crown Resources Corp. of Colorado (ACrown@) entered into a Management and Technical Services Agreement (the AAgreement@) dated January 1, 1994 which provided that Crown would provided, management, administrative, accounting, treasury, and technical services to Solitario; and  



the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



Paragraph 2 (b) shall be deleted and be replaced by the following:


(b)     Service Fees. In addition to payment or reimbursement of Costs paid by Crown, Solitario shall pay to Crown service fees as follows:
(1)     an operations management fee equal to 2% of the costs paid by Crown on behalf of Solitario and reimbursable to Crown by Solitario pursuant to paragraph 2 (a), and

(2)     an operations management fee equal to 2% of the costs paid directly by Solitario pursuant to paragraph 2 (a), and

(3)     Solitario will reimburse Crown an amount equal to one-half of the following costs; salaries and benefits of Denver and Houston personnel, Denver and Houston office rent, insurance, and investor relations meeting expenses (trade shows).  

(4)     Service fees shall be paid monthly in arrears within fifteen (15) days after receipt by Solitario of Crown=s invoice for the same.  Service fee rates shall be subject to review annually and revised by mutual agreement of Crown and Solitario.









Paragraph 11 shall deleted and replaced by the following:


11.     Term and Termination.  This agreement shall commence on April 1, 1999, and shall remain in effect for a term of three (3) years (the APrimary Term@) and shall continue thereafter until terminated on the last day of any month occurring on or after the last of the Primary Term if Solitario or Crown elects to terminate this Agreement and gives at least one hundred eighty (180) days= prior written notice of such termination, specifying the date of such termination, to the other.  Both parties may terminate or modify the agreement by mutual consent at any time.



 



 

Paragraph 13, Notices, is modified to change the addresses of both Crown and Solitario to 1675 Broadway, Suite 2400, Denver, CO 80228, and the phone numbers to (303) 534-1030.



All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain the same.



 

EXECUTED as of the day first written above.


by: Crown Resources Corp. of Colorado                 by: Solitario Resources Corporation



 

________________________________              ______________________________

title_____________________________          title___________________________
Exhibit 10.3


Summary of Executive Compensation of Named Executive Officers

      The current salaries payable to each "named executive officer", as defined
in Item 402 of Regulation S-K, of Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the
"Company") are as follows:

George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer (PEO)           $225,000

John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer (PFO)                         $180,000

Barbara J. Fournier, Vice President, Chief Operating                    $200,000
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

R. Scott MacPhee, Executive Vice President                                    --

William W. Gribbell, Executive Vice President                                 --

      Messrs. MacPhee and Gribbell are Investment Executives of the Company,
whose compensation consists primarily of commissions earned on the sale of
interests in the Sponsored REITs that are syndicated by the Company. As is
standard practice in the investment industry, Investment Executives earn as
commission a percentage of payout of the gross sales commission earned on each
investment sale. The actual amount of compensation earned as commissions is
determined by the level of sales conducted by each individual.

      Each of the named executive officers listed above, other than the
Investment Executives, is eligible for a bonus payable in the form of cash
and/or shares of common stock of the Company based on the Company's performance
and the individual's performance during the year.

      With respect to the 2006 fiscal year, the Company paid the following cash
bonuses(1) to its named executive officers in 2007:

John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer (PFO)                         $335,000

Barbara J. Fournier, Vice President, Chief Operating                    $365,000
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

        The Company did not grant any stock awards to any of its named executive
officers for the 2006 fiscal year.


--------
(1)   George J. Carter is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company. Mr. Carter's overall performance for 2006 was considered
      excellent by the Compensation Committee. However, at the request of Mr.
      Carter, the Compensation Committee did not consider making any
      recommendation to the Board for a cash bonus for 2006 performance.
      Although the Compensation Committee considered the Company's results
      during 2006 to be outstanding, the price of the Company's common stock did
      not increase measurably over the course of the year. The price per share
      at the beginning of 2006 was $20.95 and the price per share at the end of
      2006 was $21.05. Mr. Carter believes that the Chief Executive Officer has
      the ultimate responsibility for the stock price and that it is the Chief
      Executive Officer's responsibility to get the Company's message out to the
      public. The Compensation Committee determined that, based upon the
      performance of the Company and Mr. Carter personally, Mr. Carter deserved
      a bonus. However, the Compensation Committee decided to honor Mr. Carter's
      request that he not be considered for a cash bonus.
#### J. D. McMahan et al. v. A. Dennis.

(No. 1298, Op. Book No. 2, p. 517.)

Appeal from Bell County.

October 29, 1881.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1209. *Jurisdiction of county court; injunction.*This suit was instituted in the county court to enjoin a judgment in the justice’s court for $18. The constitution provides that ‘(the county courts or judges thereof shall have power to issue writs of *mandamus,*injunction, and all other writs necessary to the enforcement of the jurisdiction of said court.” [Coust. art. *V,*sec. 1G.] The authority to issue the writ of injunction is confined to matters within the original jurisdiction of the county court, or to such matters as have been brought within the jurisdiction of the court by appeal or *certiorari.*It will be observed that the constitution limits the authority to issue the injunction to cases where it is necessary to the enforcement of the jurisdiction of the county court. It has been frequently decided that the county judge has no authority to issue an injunction in matters within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, except it be- where the jurisdiction of the county court had attached by appeal or *certiorari;*then the writ may issue in aid of the jurisdiction of the county court, and not otherwise. The writ of injunction cannot be used as a mode of appeal. The county court does not have general supervisory control over justices’ courts, but has only appellate jurisdiction, to be exercised in the manner provided by law. Consent of parties cannot give such jurisdiction.

Reversed and dismissed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1057-E1058]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  5715 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN ONE ROOM

                                 ______

                        HON. FORTNEY PETE STARK

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 17, 1995
  Mr. STARK. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to share with my colleagues news 
of a special gathering that will take place on Thursday, May 18, in 
Castro Valley, CA. Over 50 senior citizens, each over 100 years old, 
will join together at Eden Medical Center for the sixth annual 100+ 
celebration. As best I can calculate it, 5715 years of experience and 
memories will be shared by 56 people at this unique gathering.
  Every one of us has looked to an elder, perhaps a grandparent or 
great-grandparent, at different times during our lives for the wise 
counsel that only experience can provide. Their wit and wisdom speak of 
lessons learned; their knowing smiles are a reflection on decades of 
experience. I know my own mother, who is just 86 years old, has taught 
this incorrigible son an encyclopedia of lessons!
  While I cannot be there on Thursday, I want to join Eden Hospital in 
honoring our local centenarians. The most senior of these senior 
citizens are 106, including Vera Sherman and Anna Simons. There are 
also five 105 year- [[Page E1058]] olds, including Abdul Khaliqi, 
Antonio Nieto, Marie Sobieski, Mary Souza, and Ethel Stenson.
  Nicolasa Alcon, Elizabeth Denny, Etta Osborn, Epifania Saldana, Eva 
Thornton, Catherine Walker, and Lily Wilkinson are 104 this year. The 
103 year-olds who will be there on Thursday are: Giorgina Angeli, 
Michael Branden, Lillian Garfais, Mamie McGriff, and Antonio Nava. The 
presence of the 102 year-olds will be filled by Anna Galvin, Jim 
Hendricks, Hinda Jackson, Helen Leandro, Eugenia Liorentzevitch, 
Erminia Oberti, Fred Vonbrethorst, Frances Wayne, and Grace Zoellner.
  Marion Boone, Olga Cherepanoff, Josephine Corona, Hazel Garad, Olive 
Gurney, Marianne Hill, Dale Kune, Kristina Langas, Helen Minore, Marian 
Morken, Eva Ortiz, Irene Pearson, Liilie Seay, Mary Silva, Ernestine 
Smedman, Leo Valentine, and Marguerite Zugnoni, at 101, are the 
sophomores of this class. The freshmen, young at only 100, are: Jane 
Barkley, Augusta Burlingame, Alice ``Pete'' Clark, Althea Cummings, 
Leone Gardelius, Ollie Holmes, Clara Moreland, Sumako Oka, Mamie 
Person, Edith Irene Wasley, and Elizabeth Wershkull.
  Mr. Speaker, I hope my colleagues will join me in honoring these 
centenarians, especially during Older Americans Months, 1995. Their 
long and full lives have been a source of inspiration to their friends, 
family, and us all. I wish them all good health and good cheer.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 White House launches contest for best money-saving ideaPublished Aug. 5, 2013
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                White House officials launched the 2013 President's SAVE (Securing Americans Value and Efficiency) Award contest July 31.
The annual contest encourages federal employees to submit ideas for innovative ways to reduce spending, save taxpayer dollars, and create a more efficient and effective government.
The winner of this contest will have the opportunity to present his or her idea directly to President Barack Obama.
Borne out of the president's belief that the best ideas often come from those on the front lines, federal employees have submitted more than 85,000 ideas during the last four years through the SAVE Award.
Recommendations have ranged from implementing new measures that conserve energy and eliminating paper copies of publications that are available online, to using ground shipping instead of next-day service when mailing non-urgent packages.
These simple, yet innovative ideas are already making a difference. The President's last four budgets have included more than 80 SAVE Award proposals that are saving hundreds of millions of dollars and improving the way government operates, according to White House officials.
All contest submissions are confidential and can be submitted via www.whitehouse.gov/save-awardby August 9. If you have questions about the contest, please submit them to DoDSaveAward@osd.mil.
Leaders are encouraged to support their personnel to participate, as this effort is an important way to generate a more efficient and effective government for the American people.
*(Courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)*POTUS 



SAVE Award 



awards 



Air Force 



military 



innovation 



innovative 



ideas 



Barack Obama 



eficiency 



President
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CERTIFICATION

GS Mortgage
Securities Trust 2011-GC5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through

Certificates, Series 2011-GC5 (the Trust),

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the Certifying Servicer), certify GS
Mortgage Securities Corporation II and their officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:



|1. | I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicers activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) and the Certifying Servicers
performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2015



|                              |  |                 |  |                      |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | -------------------- |  | 
|TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC
|                              | 
|By:                           |  | /s/ Jacob Baron
|                              |  | Name:           |  | Jacob Baron         
|                              |  | Title:          |  | Authorized Signatory



|                                     |  |                                
|------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------
|475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017
|T                                    |  | 212.883.2800 F 212.883.2560    
|E                                    |  | info@torchlightloanservices.com
|                                     |  | www. torchlightinvestors.com