alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-4904

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAFAEL ALEXANDER MCLEAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-00-47-BO) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 27, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Mary Jude Darrow, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Following his conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g) (West 2000), Rafael A. McLean appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence of his possession of a firearm. He contends that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him, and therefore the discovery of the gun was in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. See United States v. Sokolow , 490 U.S. 1, 9 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying McLean’s motion to suppress. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
 I, John A. Ingleman, Chief Financial Officer of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated, certify that:
     1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hutchinson TechnologyIncorporated;
     2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
     3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:
     a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     c)       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a)       all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 26, 2005              /s/ John A. Ingleman   John A. Ingleman   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: AFFORGEN Deployers, MQ-9s in Kadena, Ask an MTIPublished Oct. 27, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Stephani Barge
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, units are starting to deploy under the new Air Force Force Generation model, MQ-9 Reapers relocate to Kadena Air Base, Japan, and recruits can now ask questions of Military Training Instructors online before they get to basic training. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Brittan Crolley)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



MQ-9 



RPA 



MTI 



recruiters 



BMT 



Indo-Pacific 



Kadena Air Base 



Creech Air Force Base 



Travis Air Force Base 



deployment 



AFFORGEN Related Links
        First AFFORGEN deployers depart Travis AFB
            
            First MQ-9 arrives at Kadena in major relocation milestone
            
            “Ask an MTI” informs recruiters, helps bridge the gap for recruits heading to BMT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
              
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,778,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,138,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,755,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,816,146
<PP&E>                                      39,443,885
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,580,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,411,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,656,538
<BONDS>                                     35,458,587
<COMMON>                                        54,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,581,751 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,411,481
<SALES>                                     28,236,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,236,975
<CGS>                                       21,655,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,655,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,707,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (73,343)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             636,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,310,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                   922,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,388,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,388,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        
        

</TABLE>
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Mountain Home AFB brings future faster with hand-held 3D scanner

              - Published  March 11, 2020
              -                             By Airman Natalie Rubenak                                                    
              - 366th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE, Idaho (AFNS) --  **
As technology advances around the world, the Air Force continues to fly to new heights. The future is now and Mountain Home Air Force Base is bringing it faster with the HandySCAN 3D, a hand-held 3D scanner.The 366th Maintenance Squadron acquired the device in October 2019 and began training Airmen on the most efficient ways to use the scanner.The device allows Airmen to scan a structure, eliminating the need to hand-draw the structure on the computer.“We can take an aircraft part, either on or off the aircraft, and scan it with this portable scanner,” said Tech. Sgt. Kevin Collins, 366th MXS aircraft metals technology section chief. “Once we scan it, we now have an image pulled up on the computer without needing a blueprint.”From the computer, the image is then transferred to the machine that cuts the metal.What used to take anywhere from five to ten hours of computer time now takes less than an hour.“It’s a huge time saver which ultimately saves the Air Force money,” Collins said. “The faster we can get these parts made, the faster the jet can be back up in the air.”Before the scanner, Airmen used a facsimile mold to fix a broken aircraft piece or recreate a structure.“You take this putty, mold it to the structure and wait for it to dry,” Collins said. “When it is done drying, you take it out and still have to go in and measure everything and hand draw it on the computer. It was so time-consuming.”Airman 1st Class Luke Haener, 366th MXS aircraft metals technology craftsman has been using the HandySCAN 3D since it arrived.“We use it for the complex pieces that aren’t as easy to measure and would normally take much longer,” Haener said. “It can be used for small pieces but it really comes in handy for those giant structures.”Collins also explained that the HandySCAN 3D has a stronger ability to get into the nooks and crannies of a structure.“With the facsimile, it was not very accurate sometimes, so occasionally we would have to remake the piece several times over to make it fit,” Collins said. “With the scanner, we never run into that issue. In fact, it’s accurate up to about .025mm.”The HandySCAN 3D offers simplicity and efficiency allowing Airmen to work at a fast pace, ultimately making them more mission ready. This technology is one way Mountain Home AFB is leading the way through efficiency, innovation and accuracy.

FSUSAFAFAir ForceACCAir Combat CommandMountain Home Air Force Base366th Maintenance Squadron366th MXS3D Scanneraircraft metals technology
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,742-01

EX PARTE GUSTAVO MEDINA-YANEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 14-10-14889A IN THE 506TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WALLER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to driving while

intoxicated and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

In a single ground, Applicant contends that trial counsel led him to believe that his sentence

would not be aggravated.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
2

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set out

in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s

conduct was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged deficient

conduct. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 13, 2016

Do not publish
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Chief Data Office announces first DatathonPublished July 9, 2020
                        
                        
                        Department of the Air Force Chief Data Office
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force Chief Data Office unveiled plans to host a series of Datathons — events aimed at solving critical challenges by using data. For the first Datathon, the Chief Data Office is teaming with AFWERX and the Air Force-Massachusetts Institute of Technology **Artificial Intelligence Accelerator** to focus on **C-17 Globemaster III** aircrew scheduling optimization. The team is working with C-17 crew members based at **Joint Base Charleston**, South Carolina, and **JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam**, Hawaii.
“We believe in the ideas of our Airmen,” said Eileen Vidrine, Department of the Air Force chief data officer. “For our young Airmen, data is part of their core DNA. They were raised with it, and we believe they hold the answers to existing questions—or opportunities, rather, of the Air Force—and this includes surrounding scheduling for the C-17,” Vidrine continued.
Who: DAF military (active duty, Reserve, Guard); DAF civilians
What: First Datathon focused on C-17 scheduling
When: July 14-16; 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. MDT
Where: Virtual based on registration (**https://events.afwerxchallenge.com/cdo-datathon**)
The inaugural Datathon is supporting Puckboard, a modern scheduling platform that enables real time, collaborative scheduling from anywhere in the world. Puckboard focuses on creating a great user experience for schedulers and crew members while automating time consuming tasks. The Puckboard project is led by a team of Airmen from TRON, a DoD software factory. TRON has partnered with the USAF/MIT Artificial Intelligence Accelerator and SAF/CO to incorporate lessons learned from this Datathon into Puckboard.
The Chief Data Office of the U.S. Department of the Air Force oversees and creates governance policy around data management for the department.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



datathon 



Puckboard Challenge 



Air Force Chief Data Office 



data 



AFwerX 



USAF/UMASS 



Institute of Technology 



virtual event 



innovation 



modernizing 



scheduling platform 



TRON 



DoD software factory 



C-17 



AFWERX Challenge 



operational energy 



AFWN
<PAGE>

                                                           Exhibit 99.2

                        TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jay S. Benet, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2002


/s/ Jay S. Benet
------------------------------
Jay S. Benet
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4483]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Diaz-Balart] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. DIAZ-BALART addressed the House. His remarks will appear 
hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### Texas & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. B. F. & F. E. Myers.

(No. 2747, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 392. *Superintendent of railroad; hispoioer to employ or ratify the employment of parties to care for and toait upon employees injured by the road.*Brown, the superintendent, was on the train when the accident occurred. Elliott, the conductor, brought the wounded employee to the house of Mrs. Myers, and told her that Brown, the superintendent, had sent word to her that she must spare no expense or trouble in caring for the wounded man;, that eveiy cent would be paid her. Afterwards Mi-s. Myers saw Brown, the supeiintendent, herself, and Brown told her that the account would be paid if Dr. Starley, the attending physician, would certify to its correctness. This Dr. S. did. It was also proven that the bills for services rendered by Dr. Starley and the nurse, both of whom were employed by the conductor, Elliott, at the time he brought the wounded man to the house of appellee, had been paid by the railroad. *Held,*that this evidence was sufficient to show an employment by the superintendent; if not, that it was amply sufficient to show a ratification by him. In the Toledo, Wabash & Western R. R. Co. v. Prince, 50 Ill. 26, it was held that where the station agent employed the surgeon and reported the case to the superintendent, unless that officer dissented from the action of the station agent and directed the agent to inform the surgeon, his neglect to do so would be an implied ratification of the employment.

Upon l-eason as well as upon authority, we think it well settled that a promise to pay for medical attendance and nursing rendered to a servant of a railroad company, injured in the discharge of his duty upon the road, is presumed to be within the general powers of the superintendent of the road, and will bind the company. *169[Wait’s Acts. & Defs. vol. 5, p. 313, citing Toledo, etc. R. R. Co. v. Rodriques, 47 Ill. 188; Toledo, etc. R. R. Co. v. Prince, 50 Ill. 26; Atlantic, etc. R. R. Co. v. Reisner, 18 Kans. 458; Walker v. Great Western R. R. Co. 2 El. & El. 325.]

June 9, 1883.

In the case of Marquette & Octonagon R. R. Co. v. Taft, 28 Mich. 289, the argument of Judge Cooley, upon the general scope of the authority of a railroad superintendent to make contracts for services rendered an employee of the road, injured in its employment, is not only able and exhaustive, but unanswerable. Essays, “the nature of the powers of a railroad superintendent is indicated by his title;” and he concludes by saying, “nor do we understand what rule there can be, either of law or reason, to preclude the courts’ taking judicial notice of the powers of a superintendent of a railroad, as it has often been hold they may, of those of the cashier of a bank. [See Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Bank v. Troy City Bank, 1 Dough (Mich.) 457.] In fact, the courts do often take judicial notice of the powers of even inferior officers.”

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12312 and #12313]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Missouri dated 09/10/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Flash Flooding, High Winds, Hail and Tornadoes *Incident Period:*
                         06/12/2010 through 07/31/2010.
 Effective Date: 09/10/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/9/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         6/10/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Holt, Marion. *Contiguous Counties:* Missouri: Andrew, Atchison, Lewis, Monroe, Nodaway, Ralls, Shelby. Illinois: Adams, Pike. Kansas: Doniphan. Nebraska: Nemaha, Richardson. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.500Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.750Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12312 B and for economic injury is 12313 O. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Missouri; Illinois; Kansas; Nebraska. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 10, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-23282 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P