57330 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 181 / Monday, September 20, 2010 / Notices 

Basis for Exemption Determination 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may grant an exemption from 

the diabetes standard in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to 

achieve an equivalent or greater level of 

safety than would be achieved without 

the exemption. The exemption allows 

the applicants to operate CMVs in 

interstate commerce. 

To evaluate the effect of these 

exemptions on safety, FMCSA 

considered medical reports about the 

applicants’ ITDM and vision, and 

reviewed the treating endocrinologists’ 

medical opinion related to the ability of 

the driver to safely operate a CMV while 

using insulin. 

Consequently, FMCSA finds that in 

each case exempting these applicants 

from the diabetes standard in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level 

of safety equal to that existing without 

the exemption. 

Conditions and Requirements 

The terms and conditions of the 

exemption will be provided to the 

applicants in the exemption document 

and they include the following: (1) That 

each individual submit a quarterly 

monitoring checklist completed by the 

treating endocrinologist as well as an 

annual checklist with a comprehensive 

medical evaluation; (2) that each 

individual reports within 2 business 

days of occurrence, all episodes of 

severe hypoglycemia, significant 

complications, or inability to manage 

diabetes; also, any involvement in an 

accident or any other adverse event in 

a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or 

not it is related to an episode of 

hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual 

provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s 

or optometrist’s report to the medical 

examiner at the time of the annual 

medical examination; and (4) that each 

individual provide a copy of the annual 

medical certification to the employer for 

retention in the driver’s qualification 

file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s 

qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a 

copy of the certification when driving, 

for presentation to a duly authorized 

Federal, State, or local enforcement 

official. 

Conclusion 

Based upon its evaluation of the 

twenty-one exemption applications, and 

the comment from the Pennsylvania 

Department of Transportation, FMCSA 

exempts, Tommy S. Boden, Travis D. 

Bjerk, Scott L. Colson, Dustin G. Cook, 

Nathan J. Enloe, Stephen J. Faxon, 

Joseph B. Hall, Mark H. Horne, Michael 

J. Hurst, Chad W. Lawyer, John R. Little, 

Roy L. McKinney, Thomas A. Mentley, 

David W. Rogers, Joseph J. Schwartz, 

Justin P. Sibigtroth, Duane A. Wages, 

Roosevelt Whitehead, Michael J. 

Williams, Edward L. Winget, Sr. and 

Leonard M. Ziegler from the ITDM 

standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject 

to the conditions listed under 

‘‘Conditions and Requirements’’ above. 

In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) 

and 31315 each exemption will be valid 

for two years unless revoked earlier by 

FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked 

if: (1) The person fails to comply with 

the terms and conditions of the 

exemption; (2) the exemption has 

resulted in a lower level of safety than 

was maintained before it was granted; or 

(3) continuation of the exemption would 

not be consistent with the goals and 

objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 

31315. If the exemption is still effective 

at the end of the 2-year period, the 

person may apply to FMCSA for a 

renewal under procedures in effect at 

that time. 

Issued on: September 14, 2010. 

Larry W. Minor, 

Associate Administrator for Policy and 

Program Development. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23423 Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Thrift Supervision 

Community Reinvestment Act 

AGENCY: Office of Thrift Supervision 

(OTS), Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed and continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 

U.S.C. 3507. The Office of Thrift 

Supervision within the Department of 

the Treasury will submit the proposed 

information collection requirement 

described below to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. Today, OTS is soliciting 

public comments on its proposal to 

extend this information collection. 

DATES: Submit written comments on or 

before November 19, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments, referring to 

the collection by title of the proposal or 

by OMB approval number, to 

Information Collection Comments, Chief 

Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift 

Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20552; send a facsimile 

transmission to (202) 906–6518; or send 

an e-mail to 

infocollection.comments@ots.treas.gov. 

OTS will post comments and the related 

index on the OTS Internet Site at 

http://www.ots.treas.gov. In addition, 

interested persons may inspect 

comments at the Public Reading Room, 

1700 G Street, NW by appointment. To 

make an appointment, call (202) 906– 

5922, send an e-mail to 

public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a 

facsimile transmission to (202) 906– 

7755. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You 

can request additional information 

about this proposed information 

collection from Ms. Bobbie K. Kennedy 

at (202) 906–6050, Office of Thrift 

Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20552. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OTS may 

not conduct or sponsor an information 

collection, and respondents are not 

required to respond to an information 

collection, unless the information 

collection displays a currently valid 

OMB control number. As part of the 

approval process, we invite comments 

on the following information collection. 

Comments should address one or 

more of the following points: 

a. Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of OTS; 

b. The accuracy of OTS’s estimate of 

the burden of the proposed information 

collection; 

c. Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; 

d. Ways to minimize the burden of the 

information collection on respondents, 

including through the use of 

information technology. 

We will summarize the comments 

that we receive and include them in the 

OTS request for OMB approval. All 

comments will become a matter of 

public record. In this notice, OTS is 

soliciting comments concerning the 

following information collection. 

Title of Proposal: Community 

Reinvestment Act. 

OMB Number: 1550–0012. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Description: The Community 

Reinvestment Act regulation requires 

the OTS, as well as the Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency, the Board 

of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, and the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (collectively, the 

Agencies), to evaluate and assign ratings 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 181 / Monday, September 20, 2010 / Notices 57331 

to the efforts of institutions to help meet 

the credit needs of their communities, 

including low- and moderate-income 

neighborhoods, consistent with safe and 

sound banking practices. OTS uses the 

information in the examination process 

and in evaluating applications for 

mergers, branches, and certain other 

corporate activities. Further, the CRA 

statute requires the Agencies to issue 

regulations to carry out its purposes. 

OTS uses the data collected under the 

CRA regulations to fulfill its obligations 

under the statute, including the 

assessment of each institution’s record 

of helping to meet the credit needs of its 

entire community. OTS uses the data to 

support its conclusions regarding an 

institution’s record of performance, in 

assigning a rating, and in preparing the 

written public evaluations that the 

statute requires when an institution is 

examined. Additionally, judgments 

based on these data are used in 

evaluating an institution’s applications 

for mergers, branches, and other 

corporate activities. The public uses this 

information to assess independently the 

institution’s CRA performance and to 

participate meaningfully in the 

application process. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for-profit. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

753. 

Estimated Frequency of Response: 

Annually; On occasion. 

Estimated Total Burden: 67,210 

hours. 

Dated: September 14, 2010. 

Ira L. Mills, 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, Office of Chief 

Counsel, Office of Thrift Supervision. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23421 Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720–01–P 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES