alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12283 and #12284]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1934-DR), dated 08/17/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe storms, flooding, and tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/12/2010 through 07/31/2010.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         08/26/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/18/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/17/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Missouri, dated 08/17/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Knox, Linn, Marion, Monroe, Pike, Ralls, Shelby.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-22298 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00472

- CV

ARC PARKLANE, INC. d/b/a Parklane West Healthcare Center,

Appellant

v.

Arvel SEALS Jr., as Representative of the Estate of Dora Sylvia Lehrman, Deceased

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 10177

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

court for this appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.4

.

SIGNED November 25, 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
GREAT WALL ACQUISITION CORPORATION




                                                     ______________, 2003


Sherleigh Associates LLC
660 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10021

Gentlemen:

         This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the
effective date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial
public offering ("IPO") of the securities of Great Wall Acquisition Corporation
("GWAC") and continuing until the consummation by GWAC of a "Business
Combination" (as described in GWAC's IPO Prospectus), Sherleigh Associates LLC
shall make available to GWAC certain office and secretarial services as may be
required by GWAC from time to time, situated at 660 Madison Avenue, 15th Floor,
New York, New York 10021. In exchange therefore, GWAC shall pay Sherleigh
Associates LLC the sum of $500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing
monthly thereafter.


                                              Very truly yours,


                                              GREAT WALL ACQUISITION CORPORATION




                                              By:
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Kin Shing Li
                                                  Title: Chairman of the Board

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

SHERLEIGH ASSOCIATES LLC


By:
    ---------------------------
    Name: Jack Silver
    Title: President
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States respecting 

the right to decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States respecting the right to decent, safe, sanitary, and 

affordable housing. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 32 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. All persons shall have a right to decent, 

3 safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, which right shall 

4 not be denied or abridged by the United States or any 

5 State. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en7 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla8 tion.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23183]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

20 CFR Part 416

[Docket No. SSA-2009-0017]
RIN 0960-AH00

Improvements to the Supplemental Security Income Program--Heroes 
Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008 (HEART Act)

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Final Rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register of September 7, 2010, we published a 
final rule document revising our regulations to incorporate 
improvements to the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program made by 
the HEART Act. We inadvertently stated the RIN incorrectly as 0960-
AD78. This document corrects the RIN to 0960-AH00.

DATES: Effective on September 17, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Rudick, Office of 
Regulations, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, 
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (410) 965-7102. For information on 
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 
1-800-772-1213, or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, 
Social Security Online, at http://www.socialsecurity.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We published a final rule document in the 
Federal Register of September 7, 2010, (75 FR 54285) revising our 
regulations to incorporate improvements to the SSI program made by the 
HEART Act. In this final rule, we incorrectly stated the RIN as 0960-
AD78. This correction changes the RIN to 0960-AH00.

Martin Sussman,
Senior Advisor for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2010-23183 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2011 

d0321 

Order 

 

March 29, 2011 

142303 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142303 

 COA: 300839 

Ingham CC: 09-001489-FH 

ROBERT ALLEN THOMPSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[No. 44452-2-I.

Division One.

May 15, 2000.]

#### Marthelma Tarver, *Individually and as Personal Representative, Appellant,*v. E.J. Kartells Co., *Defendant,*Rapid-American Corporation, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-28900-9, Joan E. DuBuque, J., entered March 26, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Becker, A.C.J., and Baker, J.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Microbics, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad Nagel,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, In all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by U.S. Microbics ,
      Inc .
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





February
      20, 2007











/S/
      Conrad
      Nagel


Conrad
      Nagel


Chief
      Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 164 DB 2020 (No. 95 RST 2020)

:

JILL WITTENBORN DUFFY : Attorney Registration No. 67075

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Bucks County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of December

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated December 2

, 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED

that Jill Wittenborn Duffy

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that s he

has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
September 1, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDA WHITE, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00458-CV V.

PRIMOSE AT HERITAGE PARK, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 11, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Freda White.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Wm. Little v. C. G. Woodbridge.

(No. 1170, Op. Book No. 3, p. 503.)

Appeal from Olay County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 152. *Jurisdiction; venue of suit.*W. sued L. in Olay county for services performed under a contract in surveying lands in Clay county, alleging the residence of L. to be in Galveston county, and for jurisdiction relied upon the fact that he had performed the work in Olay *61county. W. pleaded Ms personal privilege to be sued in Galveston county. *Held,*that the plea should have prevailed, as it was not shown that L. had contracted to pay W. in Clay county for his services performed in that county. It was not sufficient to give jurisdiction in Clay county that W. had agreed to perform and had performed his part of the contract in that county for which L. was liable to pay him. Such liability would be a general one, and not one which obliged Mm to comply with it at a particular place. To sustain the jurisdiction of the suit, the contract must have obligated L. to pay W. for his services in Clay county. [Pas. Dig. art. 1423; R. S. art. 1198; Wilson v. Adams, 15 Tex. 324.]

§ 153. *Amendment; allegation of fraud as a jurisdictional fact.*It was competent for the plaintiff to amend his petition by alleging fraud as a jurisdictional fact, after the defendant’s plea in abatement or exception to the jurisdiction had been filed. [Evans v. Mills, 16 Tex. 198.] But the amended petition failed to allege, in connection with the allegation of fraud, the important and essential fact as to where the same was committed; for in such case the defendant was entitled to be sued in the county of Ms residence, unless the fraud was committed elsewhere, and if committed elsewhere he might be sued in the county where committed.

§154. *Jurisdiction; plea to, as to amount fraudulently claimed.*The defendant pleaded that the county court did not have jurisdiction of the amount really claimed by the plaintiff; that the amount actually due the plaintiff, if anything, was less than $200, and that the amount claimed by the plaintiff in his petition was falsely and fraudulently claimed by him for the purpose of giving jurisdiction to the county court. This plea was not sworn to, nor did the plaintiff except to it. *Held, ■1.*That it was competent for the defendant to interpose this defense. [Tarbox & Brown v. Kennon, 3 Tex. 8; Graham v. Roder, 5 Tex. 146; Gouhenant v. Anderson, 20 Tex. 459.] 2. There being evidence before the jury *62tending to establish the plea, the court should have instructed the jury that if they were satisfied from the evidence that the amount due from the defendant to the plaintiff, at the commencement of the suit, did not exceed $200, exclusive of interest, and that the plaintiff has alleged in his petition the amount to be greater than that sum for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction on the county court, they should find in favor of the plea.

February 9, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         243,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,881,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,626,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,773,000
<PP&E>                                         635,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 563,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,571,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,447,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       805,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,319,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,124,000
<SALES>                                     11,527,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,527,000
<CGS>                                        8,657,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,132,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,438,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                914,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   356,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            558,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   558,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>
No. 87-1306.

#### South Central Enterprises, Inc., et al. *v.*Farrington, Trustee.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed October 27, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D19-1315 & 3D20-1179

Lower Tribunal No. 17-18931

________________

College Health II, GP, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Vincenzo Depau,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline 

Hogan Scola and William Thomas, Judges.

Crabtree & Auslander, and John G. Crabtree, Charles M. Auslander,

Brian C. Tackenberg and Emily Cabrera, for appellant.

Carey Rodriguez Milian, LLP, and Ruben Conitzer, David P. Milian,

Bianca C. Alvarez and Jennifer M. Hernandez, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

In this foreclosure action, the trial court denied appellant College 

Health II, GP, Inc.’s (“College Health”) motions seeking to vacate a court 

default and resulting final default judgment.1 Citing a line of cases holding 

that a default must be lifted if the plaintiff's lawyer is aware that the defaulting 

defendant is represented by counsel,2 College Health asserts that the trial 

court was required to vacate the default and default final judgment because

appellee Vincenzo Depau’s counsel was aware, by virtue of a notice of 

appearance filed in a related, but different, foreclosure case, that College 

Health was represented by counsel in the instant case. This line of cases, 

however, requires not only "actual knowledge" that the defaulting party is 

represented by counsel, but also, "actual knowledge" that the defaulting 

party intends to defend against the lawsuit. See Lloyd, 981 So. 2d at 640; 

1 In appellate case number 3D19-1315, College Health appeals the June 3, 

2019 final order that both (i) denies College Health’s verified motion to vacate 

the court’s default brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 

1.500(d), and (ii) enters final default judgment for appellee. While 3D19-1315 

was pending, this Court relinquished jurisdiction so that College Health could 

file a Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 motion in the lower court to vacate 

the June 3rd final judgment. In appellate case number 3D20-1179, College 

Health appeals the August 14, 2020 order denying its rule 1.540 motion. This 

Court consolidated the appeals for all purposes.

2 See e.g. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Lloyd, 981 So. 2d 633, 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2008); Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. McWilliams, 799 So. 2d 378, 

380 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Gulf Maintenance & Supply, Inc. v. Barnett Bank 

of Tallahassee, 543 So. 2d 813, 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
3

McWilliams, 799 So. 2d at 380; Gulf Maintenance & Supply, 543 So. 2d at 

816. On this record, we are unable to conclude that the trial court abused its 

discretion by determining that Depau’s counsel was not aware of College 

Health’s intention to defend against Depau’s foreclosure claim, and we are 

therefore compelled to affirm. Lloyd, 982 So. 2d 639 (recognizing that an 

order denying a motion to vacate a default is reviewed under an abuse of 

discretion standard).

Affirmed.
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-43886) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2003
Exhibit 32(b)

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of TransUnion Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James M. Peck, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Samuel A. Hamood, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James M. Peck   
|Name:                |  | James M. Peck          
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    
|Date: June 20, 2013 
|                    
|/s/ Samuel A. Hamood
|Name:                |  | Samuel A. Hamood       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 20, 2013

This certification accompanies this Form 10-K/A and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that Section.
#### P. C. Walker v. Peter Bowman.

(No. 10, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 167.)

Appeal from Harris County.

January 16, 1878.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 650. *Stock law of March 83, 1874; constitutional.*The .judgment in this case was rendered in October, 1876, by the county judge of Harris county, declaring an act of the legislature entitled “An act to encourage stock raising, and for the protection of stock raisers,” approved March 23, 1S74 [Gen. Laws 14th Leg. p. 33], unconstitutional and void. Since the date of this judgment all the ■questions involved in the case and discussed so ably by counsel in their briefs have been passed upon and adjudicated in two cases, one decided by the supreme court and ■one by this court. [Beyman v. Black, 47 Tex. 558; Lastro v. State, 3 Tex. Ct. App. 363.] It is unnecessary to do more than to refer to those cases as conclusive of this.

Reversed and remanded.