alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         506,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,594,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   112,043
<INVENTORY>                                  2,027,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,298,895
<PP&E>                                       5,858,256
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,200,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,672,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,962,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,089
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,613,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,672,272
<SALES>                                      8,881,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,881,448
<CGS>                                        4,692,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,692,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,279,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (149,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (171,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (171,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
PH 9.30.2014 EX 10a












Exhibit 10(a)



TO: JEFFERY A CULLMAN


PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (RSU-002S-JAC)


The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") of Parker-Hannifin Corporation (the "Company") has awarded to you the following number of Restricted Stock Units under the Amended and Restated Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and subject to the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Terms and Conditions (RSU-002S-JAC) (the "Terms and Conditions"):


Grant Date    Number of RSUs
August 14, 2013    15,000


Vesting Date. Except as otherwise provided in the Terms and Conditions, the Restricted Stock Units will vest in full on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Grant Date, provided you remain an active full-time employee of the Company throughout the vesting period. The scheduled vesting date and amount of this award are viewable by clicking on the Grant Date hyperlink on your Restricted Stock Unit Grant Information page on the Stock Incentive Plan Administrator's web site.


Payment Dates. The Restricted Stock Units will be paid to you in shares of Parker common stock on the vesting date identified above, except as otherwise provided in the Terms and Conditions.


Your Action Items.Please take the following actions:


l   Before you accept your grant, click on the links below to review the Terms and Conditions and the Plan, which govern your award.


l Accept the Terms and Conditions and execute this Award Agreement by clicking on the "Accept" button below. If you do not accept this Award Agreement prior to the vesting date, your award will be forfeited, except in the event of your permanent disability or death prior to the vesting date (as more fully set forth in the Terms and Conditions).


l  Inform the Company of any change in address or contact information, as necessary. Refer to the section of the Terms and Conditions titled
    "Notification of Change in Personal Data" for instructions on how to provide notification to the Company.


Restricted Stock Unit Terms and Conditions (RSU-002S-JAC) Amended and Restated 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan




To view the most recent Annual Report, please click here
To view the most recent Proxy Statement, please click here 
To view the Plan Summary and Prospectus, please click here


ga_U85
#### Charles Heidenheimer & Co. v. J. C. Felker.

(No. 2595, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Mitchell County.

June 2, 1883.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 361. *Community property.*All property acquired by either husband or wife during marriage, except that which is acquired by gift, devise or descent, shall be the common property of husband and wife, and during coverture may be disposed of by the husband only. [Rev. Stats, art. 2852.]

§ 362. *Mercantile business carried on by husband and wife.*The community property of husband and wife shall be liable for their debts contracted during marriage, except in such cases as are specially excepted by law. [Rev. Stats, art. 2859.] Profits arising from a mercantile business carried on by the husband or wife during the marriage are community property. [Braden v. Gose, 57 Tex. 37.]

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 344 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 344

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from approving the introduction into commerce of gasoline that contains 
    greater than 10-volume-percent ethanol, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2013

Mr. Wicker (for himself and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from approving the introduction into commerce of gasoline that contains 
    greater than 10-volume-percent ethanol, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF GASOLINE BLENDS WITH GREATER THAN 10-VOLUME-
              PERCENT ETHANOL.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency may not, including by granting a 
waiver under section 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7545(f)(4)), authorize or otherwise allow the introduction into 
commerce of gasoline containing greater than 10-volume-percent ethanol.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF WAIVERS.

    (a) In General.--Any waiver granted under section 211(f)(4) of the 
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(f)(4)) before the date of enactment of 
this Act that allows the introduction into commerce of gasoline 
containing greater than 10-volume-percent ethanol for use in motor 
vehicles shall have no force or effect.
    (b) Certain Waivers.--The waivers described in subsection (a) 
include the following:
            (1) The waiver entitled, ``Partial Grant and Partial Denial 
        of Clean Air Act Waiver Application Submitted by Growth Energy 
        To Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 
        Percent; Decision of the Administrator'', 75 Fed. Reg. 68094 
        (November 4, 2010).
            (2) The waiver entitled, ``Partial Grant of Clean Air Act 
        Waiver Application Submitted by Growth Energy To Increase the 
        Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 Percent; Decision 
        of the Administrator'', 76 Fed. Reg. 4662 (January 26, 2011).

SEC. 3. MISFUELING RULE.

    The portions of the rule entitled, ``Regulation to Mitigate the 
Misfueling of Vehicles and Engines with Gasoline Containing Greater 
Than Ten Volume Percent Ethanol and Modifications to the Reformulated 
and Conventional Gasoline Programs'', 76 Fed. Reg. 44406 (July 25, 
2011) to mitigate misfueling shall have no force and effect 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (Second Amendment) for the period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Harry Neer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Harry M. Neer

Harry Neer, Chief Executive Officer
January 3, 2003



<PAGE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GERARD HAMILTON.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Order entered June 24, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00780-CV

MICHAEL O. PICKENS, Appellant

V.

ELIZABETH CORDIA, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-01890-F

ORDER

This is an interlocutory accelerated appeal of an order denying, in part, and granting, in 

part, appellant’s motion to dismiss the legal action. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.

§ 27.008 (West Supp. 2012). Before the Court is appellant’s June 17, 2013 emergency motion 

for stay of discovery pending resolution of this appeal and appellees’ June 21, 2013 response to 

that motion. In their response, appellees informed the Court that appellant has counterclaims 

pending in the trial court that are not part of this appeal. Because counterclaims are presently 

pending in the trial court, we DENY appellant’s motion. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
[No. 43883-2-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### Nancy Richards, *as Executrix, Appellant,*v. USAA, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Bung County, No. 98-2-11651-0, Steven G. Scott, J., entered December 11, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 ANG 'guardian angel' team rescues girl stricken during Pacific voyagePublished April 7, 2014
                        
                        By Steve Marshall
                        
                        
                        National Guard Bureau
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                A California family and theirextremely ill 1-year-old daughter, stranded in choppy waters of the Pacific Ocean, was transferred safely aboard a Navy ship April 7, enroute to San Diego thanks to the efforts of an Air National Guard "Guardian Angel" team, according to a military spokesman.
The family boarded the USS Vandegrift after pararescuemen with the California Air National Guard's 129th Rescue Wing, who reached the boat late April 3, assessed and stabilized the baby.
The Air National Guard team from Moffett Federal Airfield in California, composed of three pararescuemen and a combat rescue officer. According to 2nd Lt. Roderick Bersamino, the wing's public affairs officer, the team flew in an MC-130P Combat Shadow aircraft for the five and a half-hour flight before parachuting near the family's boat to begin rescue operations. Jumping in with a Zodiac boat and rucksacks filled with a full array of medical equipment, the Air National Guard team will stay with the family until they reach port in San Diego.
The ill girl, identified by the Associated Press as Lyra Kaufman, 1, was in stable condition aboard the Navy vessel. Sailors assisted her and her family aboard the ship the morning of April 6.
The family includes her sister, Cora, 3, and parents, Charlette and Eric Kaufman. The Kaufmans were attempting a round-the-world voyage on their 36-foot sailboat Rebel Heart, when the boat became disabled just as Lyra’s condition worsened.
As of April 7, authorities said they were still not sure what illness the little girl has. Her symptoms included fever and a rash over most of her body.
Because the sailboat was taking on so much water, authorities were sinking it, the AP reported.
The 129th Rescue Wing was alerted to the emergency by the Coast Guard, which received a satellite distress call from the Kaufmans after their vessel lost steering and communications about 900 nautical miles off the coast of Mexico.safety 



water rescue 



ANG 



129th Rescue Wing 



pararescue
No. 87-6253.

#### Vigil *v.*Abourezk et al.

Ct. -App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: OCP Authorized / FACT ProgramPublished Oct. 3, 2018
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)**– On this look Around the Air Force, the Operational Camouflage Pattern is authorized for wear, Airmen from the 62nd Airlift Wing assist in Exercise Ample Strike, and Undergraduate Pilot Training students can choose the U-2S airframe on their dream sheets. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Angelo Rosario.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:OCPAmple StrikeU-2 FACTATAF 



AirForce TV 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



AF Reports 



A1C Angelo Rosario 



Ample Strike 



fact 



62nd Airlift Wing 



JTAC 



C-17 



Globemaster III 



OCP 



OperationalCamouflage Pattern
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4798]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              FEDERAL BUDGET MUST BE BROUGHT UNDER CONTROL

  (Mr. JONES asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. JONES. Mr. Speaker, time is running out.
  If Congress fails to address the out-of control Federal budget, it 
will soon be too late for our children's future.
  If we fail to end the irresponsible spending that Washington has 
engaged in for the last 25 years, we can say goodbye to the American 
dream, and say hello to a diminished standard of living for our kids.
  The consequences are jut too great to imagine if we do not bring the 
Federal budget into balance. In just 10 years, at current projections, 
the Federal Government will be unable to pay for anything beyond the 
service on the debt and entitlements. That means no defense, no law 
enforcement, or any other domestic spending.
  Mr. Speaker, Republicans are committed to bringing budgetary sanity 
out of budgetary chaos. We will balance the budget by eliminating out-
dated agencies, waste, and programs that simply do not work. All the 
liberal Democrats can offer is class warfare rhetoric and posture for 
the best political angle. They totally fail to realize that the future 
of America is on the line and that time is running out.

                          ____________________
```
#### GRIMES v. REYNOLDS, Administrator, Appellant.

(No. 2.)

Division Two,

December 13, 1904.

Transferred from St. Lonis Court of Appeals.

Affirmed.

*Pearson & Pearson*for appellant.

*Frank J. Duvall*and *J. D. Eostetter*for respondent.

GANTT, P. J.

This case has been certified to this court by the St. Louis Court of Appeals because the opinion of that court was in conflict with an opinion of the Kansas City Court of Appeals.

The case in all essential particulars is identical with another of the same title submitted to the court at the same time. But in this action the note given to plaintiff, John M. Grimes, by his.wife, Nancy M. Grimes, and sought to be established as a probate demand against her estate, was for the sum of $660, with interest at six per cent per annum from February 1, 1889, upon which the final judgment of allowance in the circuit court in May, 1901, was for $717.16, bearing interest at six per cent, to be compounded.

The plaintiff in this case, as in the other, prevailed in the trial court and defendant appealed. There is nothing else to distinguish this case from the other in which our views of the law applicable to the facts of both eases have been given.

For the reasons and upon the facts stated in the opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in Grimes *695v. Reynolds, Adm., 94 Mo. App. 576, and for the reasons given by this eonrt in Rice, Stix Co. v. Sally, 176 Mo. l. c. 129, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

*Fox, J.,*concurs; *Burgess, J.,*not sitting.
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT TO 
 DOMINION
RESOURCES, INC. 
 NEW RETIREMENT BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN 

AMENDMENT, effective as of the date below, to the Dominion Resources, Inc. New Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan (the
“Plan”). Dominion Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009. The Board of Directors of the Company has the power to amend the Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Effective June 26, 2013, Section 1.22 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 


“Spouse” means the person to whom a Participant is legally married, under the laws of the jurisdiction where the marriage was
celebrated, at the first to occur of (a) the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service or (b) the date of the Participant’s death. 
  

	2.	Effective January 1, 2015, a new Section 9.5 is added to the Plan as follows: 

 “9.5 Time
Limitations. 
 (a) A claimant may not file a claim in accordance with Section 9.4 later than one year from the time the claim
initially arises under Section 9.5(c). 
 (b) A claimant may not bring a legal action in court relating to a claim after the later of:

 (i) Three years from the time the claim initially arises under Section 9.5(c); and 

(ii) If a claim is made in accordance with Section 9.4 within the time period prescribed in Section 9.5(a), one year
from the final disposition of the claim by the CGN Committee (whether by written notification or because the review period expires without action). 

(c) For purposes of this Section 9.5, a claim arises at the following times: 

(i) For a claim as to eligibility for the Plan, the date on which the claimant asserts that eligibility should have commenced.

 (ii) For a claim related to the amount of benefits under the Plan, the date on which benefit payments commence (or would
have commenced under the Plan’s terms, had any benefits been payable). 







 (iii) For any other claim, the date on which the claimant knows, or should
reasonably have known, the existence of any facts or circumstances sufficient to give rise to the claim. 
 To the extent the claim of a Beneficiary relates
to the amount of benefits to which a Participant was or should have been entitled, the claim arises at the same time for the Beneficiary as it would for the Participant. This does not apply to the extent the claim relates only to the
Beneficiary’s rights. 
 (d) The provisions of Section 9.5 shall control for all Plan purposes and any state or federal statute of
limitations that would apply were it not for this Section 9.5 shall not apply. The time periods set forth in this Section 9.5 shall not be tolled during any period in which a Participant’s claim is being considered under the claims
procedure set forth in Section 9.4. 
 (e) The exclusive venue for any legal action in court for any matter related to the Plan shall
be the federal court with jurisdiction for the locale of the corporate headquarters of Dominion Resources, Inc.” 
 3. In all respects
not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         141,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,733,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                   470,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,421,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,398,567
<PP&E>                                      39,270,527
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,344,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,553,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,800,707
<BONDS>                                     14,248,197
<COMMON>                                     3,002,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,921,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,553,518
<SALES>                                     52,172,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,172,234
<CGS>                                       43,360,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,360,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               120,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,122,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,598,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,793,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,805,078
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,805,078
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Prospect Flexible Income Fund, Inc. (formerly known as TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc.) (the “Company”) for the year ended  June 30, 2020 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kristin Van Dask, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. 
 /s/ Kristin Van Dask
 Kristin Van Dask
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
 Date: August 27, 2020