alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*No.*11,209.

#### Eiler *v.*Crull.

Husband and *Wipe.*— Abandonment.—Liability *for Wife's Necessaries.*— A husband who abandons his wife, without her fault, and leaves her for a period of months wholly without means of support, is liable to her son who provides for her necessaries during that time, without any express request or promise of the husband to pay therefor.

Prom the Henry Circuit Court.

*J. M. Brown, J. Brown*and *W. A. Brown,*for appellant.

*J. II Mellett*and *E. H. Bundy,*for appellee.

*376Black, C. —

The appellee sued the appellant and recovered judgment against him for $304, for boarding and maintenance furnished by the plaintiff to the wife of the defendant for twenty-two consecutive months, commencing in October, 1880.

The appellant has assigned as error the overruling of his. motion for a new trial.

He abandoned his wife, in said month, without her fault, taking with him all the household furniture and leaving her wholly destitute of money, food or means of sustenance, and thereafter he furnished her nothing.

She owned a tract of land of about one acre, with a small house thereon. About one month before said abandonment,, she leased said premises, for a period of two years, to the-plaintiff, her son by a former marriage, who, by the terms of the contract of letting, was to have the use of said premises-for that period, in consideration of certain repairs which he agreed to make thereon, a$d which he did make.

At the request of said wife, after she had been so abandoned, the plaintiff took her to said premises, where he resided., and thereafter he maintained her there at his expense, she having no property whatever except said premises. The plaintiff knew that she had no other property, and it was agreed between him and her that he would try to get some-compensation for her maintenance from the defendant.

The only question is whether the plaintiff could recover, notwithstanding the wife’s ownership of said property, there-being no express request or promise on the part of the defendant. v

During the period in which the plaintiff provided necessaries for the abandoned wife, not upon her credit, no means of support accrued or could accrue to her from the real estate owned by her. For that period the defendant left her wholly without means of support; and having done so without her fault, he was liable to the plaintiff for providing for her necessities, without the defendant’s express request or his express-*377promise to pay therefor. *Litson*v. *Brown,*26 Ind. 489; *Watkins*v. *DeArmond,*89 Ind. 553.

Filed. Jan. 9, 1885.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Per Curiam. — It is ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment be affirmed, at the appellant’s costs.
News United States Air Force
 New active component added to Air National Guard KC-135 at Eielson AFBPublished March 19, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force plans to increase the size of its existing Air National Guard **KC-135 Stratotanker** squadron at **Eielson Air Force Base**, Alaska, by adding an active-duty component to the unit.
The department plans to add four additional KC-135s and up to 220 additional active duty personnel making it a total force unit and increasing the squadron’s total KC-135 aircraft to 12. The personnel will be reassigned from within the Air Force.
The expansion of the tanker force in Alaska supports the **2019 Department of Defense Arctic Strategy** by addressing the new and emerging threats in the Asia-Pacific region.
The strategy outlines the department’s role and efforts to optimize Air and Space Force capabilities throughout the region in support of the **National Defense Strategy** by defending the homeland, competing when necessary to maintain favorable regional balances of power, and ensuring common domains remain free and open.
The first aircraft is scheduled to arrive in fiscal year 2023, pending the outcome of the required environmental impact analysis.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



ANG 



Air National Guard 



Eielson AFB 



KC-135- Stratotanker 



active duty 



Arctic Strategy 



NDS 



National Defense Strategy 



Asia-Pacific
#### J. C. McDonald *v.*J. F. Holt.

(No. 1294, Op. Book No. 2, p. 230.)

Appeal from Fannin County.

February 23, 1881.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1014. *Surety; where he appears as joint maker.*It is well settled that one of several joint promisors, not signing as a surety, cannot plead that he is a surety for the purpose of requiring the alleged principal to be jointly or simultaneously sued. [Lewis v. Riggs, 9 Tex. 164; Ritter v. Hamilton, 4 Tex. 325; Ennis & Reynolds v. Crump, 6 Tex. 85.]

§1015. *Conclusions of court upon the facts.*When the cause is tried by the judge alone, his conclusions upon the facts are entitled to the same weight as the finding of a jury, and where the evidence is conflicting it will not be disturbed. [Bailey v. White, 13 Tex. 114.]

Affirmed.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Red Flag returns to Nevada

              - Published  Jan. 29, 2014
              -                             By Airman First Class Joshua Kleinholz                                                    
              - 99th Air Base Wing Public Affairs

**NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --  **
The latest iteration of the Air Force's premier air-to-air combat training exercise kicked off Jan. 27 as allied and U.S aircraft launched to simulate battle in the sky over the Nevada Test and Training Range.

Allied aircrews from Great Britain and Australia joined U.S. warfighters in the continued effort to maximize combat readiness, capability and survivability in a contested and degraded environment during Red Flag 14-1, hosted by the 414th Combat Training Squadron. "Red Flag, more than anything else, is an opportunity," said Maj. Nathan Boardman, a Red Flag 14-1 team chief. "It's a time for weapons systems (professionals) from many different platforms to get together and learn to integrate their abilities in a very difficult environment." This time around, an increased focus on the seamless integration of space and cyber assets prepares crews for ever-evolving, non-kinetic threats. 

Boardman, a space and missile officer by trade, is the first non-pilot team chief in Red Flag history."We're always looking for new ways to integrate non-kinetic capabilities into the exercise," Boardman said. "The training we can provide is just second to none."Since its establishment in 1975, Red Flag participants have used Nellis AFB's 2.9 million acre test range as a one-of-a-kind arena for realistic air combat training. Under the Air Expeditionary Force concept, joint and allied military members deploy to Nellis AFB to make up the exercise's "Blue Force," and engage in a three-week simulated air war against the "Red Force," made up of U.S. Airmen trained in the use of enemy tactics organized by the 57th Adversary Tactics Group.The scope of the exercise brings an accelerated pace to operations base-wide.

"It's one of those unique challenges that you really look forward to -- a time to shine," said Master Sgt. Ron Eckman, the 57th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron production superintendent. "It's an opportunity to put our best foot forward in representing the Air Force, and make sure our sister forces and joint partners receive the highest quality training."Approximately 3,200 people, more than 100 aircraft and 66 squadrons will be participating in the first Red Flag since sequestration. Red Flag 14-1 is set to conclude Feb. 14.

Nellis Air Force Basejointred flag
#### Gaston & Thomas v. H. S. Parker.

(No. 723, Op. Book No. 3, p. 461.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

February 2, 1881.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 106. *Forcible entry and detainer; no appeal in cases of; statute denying appeal is constitutional.*In a case of forcible entry and detainer no appeal can be taken from the judgment of the county court. *Certiorari*is the only remedy. The statute denying the right of appeal in such cases is constitutional. [Acts 1876, p. 151.]

Note.— The above decision does not state the law as it now exists. The right of appeal is now given by statute. [R. S. art. 2455.]

§ 107. *Certiorari; writ of, issued without fiat of judge, a nullity.*A writ of *certiorari*issued by the clerk without the fiat of the judge is without authority of law, and void.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EDAC Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended October 1, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 7, 2005                 /s/ Dominick A. Pagano
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dominick A. Pagano
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 7, 2005                 /s/ Glenn L. Purple
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Glenn L. Purple
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EDAC Technologies Corporation and will be retained by EDAC
Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 487 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that overthe-road bus drivers are covered under the maximum hours requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

that over-the-road bus drivers are covered under the 

maximum hours requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Driver Fatigue Preven5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 

7 OF 1938. 

8 Section 13(b)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

9 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)(1)) is amended by inserting be10 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘except a driver of an 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 487 IS

1 ‘over-the-road bus’ as defined in section 3038(a)(3) of the 

2 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (Public 

3 Law 105–178; 49 U.S.C. 5310 note)’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Air National Guard wins Foulois Award for flight safetyPublished Jan. 14, 2014
                        
                        By Master Sgt. Marvin Preston
                        
                        
                        Air National Guard Readiness Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The Air National Guard was recently awarded the Major General Benjamin D. Foulois Memorial Award for the most exemplary flight safety record of all Air Force major commands during fiscal 2012.Brig. Gen. Robert S. Williams, the commander of the Air National Guard Readiness Center here, accepted the award on behalf of the men and women of the ANG."When I heard the Air National Guard was awarded the Benjamin D. Foulois award for flight safety, I wasn't surprised at all," Williams said. "The past four years have been the safest in the Air National Guard's history. As the commander of the ANGRC, I have the privilege and luxury of seeing the daily outstanding work from our Airmen from all 54 states, territories and the District of Columbia."The Order of Daedalians presents the Foulois Award annually to the Air Force major command that achieved the best flying safety record as determined by the Air Force chief of staff.The ANG, which includes 93 wings, flew 1,213 aircraft more than 348,000 flight hours. This accounted for 30 percent of the combat Air Force's mission. There were 12 unique missions with high mishap potential and not a single fighter Class-A mishap in 139,000 flight hours was recorded.The ANG Maintenance Resource Management program sets the Air Force standard that resulted in a two-year 86 percent reduction in maintenance mishaps and saved more than $78 million."What these Airmen do is amazing and I'm proud to accept this award on behalf of the men and women who exemplify the core values of integrity, service and excellence," Williams said. "Our outstanding safety record is the result. What can I say? Safety is simply part of our DNA that defines who we are."The Order of Daedalians was formed in 1921 to honor the sacrifices made by the first American pilots. The Daedalians began presenting annual awards for excellence in flight in 1938.Air National Guard 



Foulois Award 



flight safety 



ANG
### NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 344

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ RANDALL BOLIVAR , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 105 th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez , Vela, and Perke s Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Randall Bolivar , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be enterta ined,2

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 8th day of December, 2011

.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  March-31-1998
<CASH>                        1,683,621
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 377,569
<ALLOWANCES>                  296,268
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2,023,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         104,438
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    1,919,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2,023,805
<SALES>                       000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              23,799
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              85,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (61,676)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (61,676)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (13.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (13.35)
        

</TABLE>
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 20-0496 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JONATHAN WILLIAM PRESLEY, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

:LED 

JUN 2 1 2022 

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf Montana 

ORDER 

Appellant Jonathan William Presley appeals from the Judgment and Commitment 

of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, in its Case No. BDC 2019-

388. Presley argues the District Court erred by failing to give him credit for 372 days 

served. 

The State has filed a Notice of Concession that this matter should be remanded to 

the District Court for the purpose of entering an amended sentence and judgment. Without 

agreeing with all of the arguments Presley has raised, the State agrees that in this case the 

District Court erred in failing to give Presley credit for 372 days served. 

Based on Presley's opening brief and the State's concession, and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the First Judicial 

District Court, Lewis and Clark County, with instructions for the District Court to amend 

its Judgment and Commitment and replace the sentence reduction for time served of 31 

days with 372 days. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

presiding judge Honorable Mike McMahon. 

Dated this ZI day of June, 2022. 

/er 

06/21/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0496
L

lrl 

- 

Justices
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ROBERT EDWARD KERR,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 606 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-920-1430-ET; WYW 109115]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Public land order.

# SUMMARY:

This order extends the withdrawal created by Public Land Order No. 6797 for an additional 20-year period. This extension is necessary to continue the protection of the Whiskey Mountain Bighorn Sheep Winter Range in Fremont County.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 14, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janelle Wrigley, BLM Wyoming State Office, 5353 N. Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003, 307-775-6257.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose for which the withdrawal was first made requires this extension to continue the protection of the Whiskey Mountain Bighorn Sheep Winter Range. The withdrawal extended by this order will expire on September 13, 2030, unless, as a result of a review conducted prior to the expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f), the Secretary determines that the withdrawal shall be further extended.

## Order

By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714, it is ordered as follows:

Public Land Order No. 6797 (55 FR 37878 (1990)), which withdrew 9,609.74 acres of public mineral estate from location or entry under the United States mining laws (30 U.S.C. Ch. 2) to protect the Whiskey Mountain Bighorn Sheep Winter Range, is hereby extended for an additional 20-year period until September 13, 2030.

(Authority:  43 CFR 2310.4)

 Dated: September 9, 2010.

Wilma A. Lewis,

Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-23328 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
adc_107a.htm


Exhibit 10.7(a)


 



	


	
58 Marine Parade Drive, Suite 1005, Toronto, Ontario M8V 4G1







 


June 7, 2013


 


Att.: Sandra Elsley


 


Dear Sandra,


 


Please consider this letter as confirmation that as of today’s date, you will join Converted Carbon Technologies Corp “CCT” as an Officer. Your title will be Vice President Corporate Communications. You will receive $25,000 payable over a 12 month period. As well, you will receive 90,000 warrants to purchase CCT common shares. The warrants are at the issue price of new offering exercisable for three years from today’s date.


 


Your responsibilities will be to assist CCT in raising funds and preparing documentation. Upon request, you will attend investment meetings, follow up and communicate with investors. As well, you will assist with documentation preparation for Government funding applications.


 


Kind Regards;


 


Paul Ramsay


 


Converted Carbon Technologies Corp 


 


58 Marine Parade Drive, Suite 1005 


 


Toronto, Ontario M8V4G1


 


Accepted


 





Sandra Elsley
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Financial Officer
of Ameritek Ventures, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form
10-K”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ameritek Ventures (the “Company”)
certifies to his knowledge that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                           



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth P. Mayeaux     
|Kenneth P. Mayeaux         
|Principal Financial Officer
|                           
|Date:  October 10, 2018
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000657

24-APR-2019

08:48 AM