alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 24 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GEORGE FLEMING AND F LEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. , Appellants

NO. 14

- 12

- 00299

- CV V.

CAROLYN B. ALVAREZ, ET. AL. , Appellees

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant = s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment

signed by the court below on February 17, 2012. Having considered the motion and

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs incurred by reason of this

appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 17

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  establishing English as the official language of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2007

  Mr. Doolittle introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  establishing English as the official language of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1.  The English language shall be the official language 
of the United States and shall be used for all public acts, including 
every order, resolution, vote, or election, and for all records and 
judicial proceedings of the Government of the United States and the 
governments of the several States.
    ``Sec. 2.  The Congress and the States shall have power to enforce 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5388-H5389]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

PERMISSION FOR SUNDRY COMMITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES TO SIT TODAY DURING 
                           THE 5-MINUTE RULE

  Mr. GOSS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the following 
committees and their subcommittees be permitted to sit today while the 
House is meeting in the Committee of the Whole House under the 5-minute 
rule.
  The Committee on Agriculture; the Committee on Banking and Financial 
Services; the Committee on Commerce; [[Page H5389]] the Committee on 
Economic and Educational Opportunities; the Committee on Government 
Reform and Oversight; the Committee on House Oversight; the Committee 
on the Judiciary; the Committee on National Security; the Committee on 
Resources; the Committee on Small Business; and the Permanent Select 
Committee on Intelligence.
  Mr. Speaker, it is my understanding that the minority has been 
consulted and that there is no objection to these requests.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Gillmor). Is there objection to the 
request of the gentleman from Florida?
  Mr. VOLKMER. Reserving the right to object, Mr. Speaker, I thank the 
majority for consulting with the minority on this request, and the 
minority agrees with the request.
  Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my reservation of objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.
  

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEONIDES GARCIA.

February 28, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the accompanying AnnualReport of Kaya Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as amended, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig Frank, Chairman of the Board,President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge, that:

 

 

Dated: July 9, 2015
#### W. J. W. Kerr v. J. W. Nutten.

(No. 2793, Op. Book No. 4, p. —.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

June 9, 1883.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 410. *Appeal bond; description of judgment in.*In justice’s court, judgment was for defendant ‘ ' that plaintiff take nothing by his suit, and that defendant go hence, and that he 'recover his costs of plaintiff,” etc. The appeal bond in county court, after giving proper style of case, number and date of judgment, described the judgment as follows: *“*The defendant recovered a judgment against Kerr for the costs of said suit, said costs amounting to the sum of $27.25, from which said judgment of said justice’s court, the plaintiff, Kerr, appealed.” The county court, on motion, dismissed the appeal, because the judgment, as described in the bond, was not such a final judgment as would give that court jurisdiction on appeal. *Held,*on authority of Owens v. Levy, *ante,*that there was no misdescription, but a failure to give a full and complete description of the judgment appealed from, and the county court erred in sustaining the motion and dismissing the appeal.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         regarding health care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2007

 Ms. McCollum of Minnesota (for herself, Mr. Ellison, and Ms. Jackson-
  Lee of Texas) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         regarding health care.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Health Protection 
Amendment of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

    The following article is proposed as an amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents 
and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Health care, including care to prevent and treat 
illness, is the right of all citizens of the United States and 
necessary to ensure the strength of the Nation.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23307]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Global Markets Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'').

ACTION: Notice of meeting of Global Markets Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Global Markets Advisory Committee will hold a public 
meeting on October 5, 2010, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., at the CFTC's 
Washington, DC headquarters.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 5, 2010 from 1 p.m. to 5 
p.m. Members of the public who wish to submit written statements in 
connection with the meeting should submit them by October 4, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place in the first floor hearing room 
at the CFTC's headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20581.
    Written statements should be submitted to: Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20581, attention Office of the Secretary. Please use the 
title ``Global Markets Advisory Committee'' in any written statement 
you may submit. Any statements submitted in connection with the 
committee meeting will be made available to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Otten, Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5388.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda for the meeting will include 
discussion of:

Ongoing and anticipated IOSCO projects
Relevant Dodd/Frank rulemakings
Foreign Board of Trade (FBOT) rulemaking
European Commission Proposal/comparison to Dodd/Frank

    The meeting will be webcast on the CFTC's Web site, http://www.cftc.gov. Members of the public also can listen to the meeting by 
telephone. The public access call-in numbers will be announced at a 
later date.

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec.  10(a)(2).

    By the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

     Dated: September 14, 2010.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23307 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### STEPHEN F. HUETTENMOSER v. RICHARD H. CONNELLY.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, MAGISTRATE COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 10, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

Ex parte Antwaun Deon Robinson, Appellant(s)

V.

No. 04-14-00512-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014W0146

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order 

is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on February 9, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Stock Certificate


EXHIBIT 4.1




										
	





NUMBER




09915

	

	COMMON STOCK




SHARES


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	CUSIP 010722 10 6


	 
	ALADDIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.

	 

	 
	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA

	SEE REVERSE FOR


	 
	 
	 

	 
	CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	This Certifies that

	Specimen

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 
	


	is the owner of

	 

	 
	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK WITH NO PAR VALUE OF


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	ALADDIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.


	 
	  

	 
	 

	transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.


	 
	 

	 
	 

	WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	

	 
	 

	Dated:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	

	 

	 
	

	


	 
	TREASURER

	 
	 
	PRESIDENT

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
















													
	 

	 


	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


	 


	TEN COM

	—

	as tenants in common

	 
	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT

	—

	 
	Custodian

	 

	TEN ENT

	—

	as tenants by the entireties

	 
	 
	(Cust)

	 
	(Minor)


	JT TEN

	—

	as joint tenants with right of

	 
	 
	under Uniform Gifts to Minors


	 
	survivorship and not as tenants

	 
	 
	Act

	 

	 
	in common

	 
	 
	 
	(State)


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 

	 


	Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


	 


	For value received, ________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


	 


	 
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

	 

	 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

	 

	 

 

	


	 

	 


	 

	 

	 
	PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE


	 

	 
	 

	 

	 

	 
	 
	 

	 

	 

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 
	shares


	of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


	_________________________________________, Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


	 


	Dated:


	 


	 

	 

	 

	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


	 

	 

	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED BY: 

	 

	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GURAANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17AD-15.

	SPECIMEN
EX-33.10
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

The Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is responsible for assessing
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has
determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the
servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment for the Period, the Company has complied, in all
material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance for
the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari Gillund
    Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 23, 2012
News United States Air Force
 AETC announces 2020 Spark Tank winnerPublished Nov. 3, 2019
                        
                        By Dan Hawkins
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Ideas to transform space warfighting training and build a culture of innovation were named Air Education and Training Command Spark Tank 2020 Challenge winners.
The 381st Training Group’s idea to transform low-fidelity training into a student-centered, solid foundation for space warfighters and Air University’s “give makerspace” idea that enables creative, innovative Airmen to devise solutions in a dedicated makerspace by providing physical space to work in.
“This year’s competition was intense,” said Maj. Gen. Mark Weatherington, AETC deputy commander. “Every entry was well thought out and illustrates the expertise we have across the First Command to develop innovative solutions and improve our overall efficiency.”
Two teams earned $2,500 from the Airmen Powered by Innovation program and will also represent AETC at the next level of the Spark Tank 2020 competition.
The “enhancing warfighting innovation through software training” project was developed by Capt. Alex Hartenburg and Capt. Perry Van Zandt, 533rd Training Squadron instructors at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.
“The project addresses one of the gaps in tactical space operations that space operators are not taught and they do not typically possess, which are the skills required to use programming software to script and produce the models necessary to plan, think critically and problem solve for space-based engagements,” said Sean Harrington, AETC innovation office.
Created by Maj. Spencer Lee at Air University, the “give makerspace” idea encourages ingenuity and creativity in every Airman, by creating physical space to ideate, develop and iterate creative endeavors. It also outlines the need to develop policies to guarantee Airmen the time and space to express that creativity, as well as ways to encourage commanders to promote and reward Airmen to tackle everyday challenges.
“The makerspace promotes the sharing of design experience and opportunities to Airmen,” Harrington said.
Makerspace provides creative tools including 3D printers, 3D scanners, measuring equipment, high-performance computers, design software, white boards, feedstock and associated hand tools. The pilot program for “give makerspace” is a research initiative at squadron officers school called “AF Maker” and is conducted under the Air University advanced research elective.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AETC 



Air Education and Training Command 



Spark Tank 



challenge 



space 



Warfighting 



training 



culture 



innovation 



API 



Airmen Powered by Innovation 



Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph 



Vandenberg Air Force Base 



Air University
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4799-H4800]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    REPUBLICANS PROMISES ARE BROKEN

  (Mrs. LOWEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 
[[Page H4800]] minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Mrs. LOWEY. Mr. Speaker, the Republican budget cuts $24 billion from 
Social Security. Seniors who have worked hard their whole lives will 
lose hundreds of dollars in Social Security benefits. Social Security 
is a contract that we've made with our Nation's seniors. The Republican 
budget tears that contract into pieces.
  The Republican budget cuts $283 billion from Medicare. The Republican 
budget will eliminate Medicare as we know it by herding seniors into 
HMO's and by charging them $3,500 more for their health care. Seniors 
who depend on Medicare will be out of luck.
  Mr. Speaker, the Republican budget breaks faith with the millions of 
American seniors who depend on Medicare and Social Security to make 
ends meet.
  Day after day we have heard how the Republicans have kept their 
promises to the American people. One after another the Republicans told 
us that promises made are promises kept.
  Well Mr. Speaker, today we learn that Republican promises made are 
promises broken.
  Speaker Gingrich and the Republican majority promised that they would 
not cut Social Security benefits. They promised not to devastate 
Medicare.
  But what is the truth? What does their new budget say?
  This is how the Republicans keep their promises: By cutting Medicare. 
By cutting Social Security. The American people deserve better.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Conrad Nagel, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                            /S/CONRAD NAGEL
                                            ---------------
                                            Conrad Nagel
                                            Principal Accounting Officer
                                            August 14, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 99.7



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of RESAAS Services Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December
31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  May 1, 2017 |                        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   |                        
|                   | /s/ Tom Rossiter       
|                   | Tom Rossiter           
|                   | Chief Executive Officer