alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AETC, AFPC command chiefs talk DSD process on Reddit, Twitter

              - Published  May 4, 2022
              - Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **

Two chief master sergeants hosted a two-hour **Reddit Ask Me Anything** to answer questions from Airmen about the Developmental Special Duty application process May 2.**Chief Master Sgt. Erik Thompson**, **Air Education and Training Command**’s senior enlisted leader, and **Chief Master Sgt. Eryn McElroy**,**Air Force Personnel Center**’s command chief, led the interactive, virtual Q&A session.     Questions from the community included a broad range of general DSD process questions and suggestions, the DSD matching process, the assignment notification timeline, and more. Both chiefs also participated in a Twitter Spaces conversation on the same topic toward the end of the Reddit event.  One of the most popular topics during the online exchange centered on the 83B300 Air Force Specialty Code, which puts non-commissioned officers into instructor roles at **Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps** detachments.   “The career field will be a part of future DSD cycles,” Thompson said to a poster who asked about whether the job would remain a volunteer assignment or move to DSD.  Several commenters noted the promise of the DSD process moving to myVector and asked about non-volunteers for DSD being picked up for the program.  

“We are moving away from non-vols with the upcoming DSD changes,” McElroy said. “When we fully move to myVector, it will be volunteer based, and will only be non-vol if we don’t receive enough vols.”  One user asked if there had been any talk on the idea of weighing a DSD assignment heavier for promotion or assignments. 

“We are absolutely discussing that,” Thompson said. “On the promotion side, we are looking at several different options for those in DSD. More to follow on that. Same goes for the assignment side.”  During the Twitter Spaces discussion, both chiefs continued to speak on the DSD process in general, the new 83B300 career field, and the upcoming program rebrand, with the name changing from DSD to Force Generators.  Thompson had a final message to those thinking about applying to be a force generator.  “We need you,” Thompson said. “You’re absolutely critical to the Air Force’s ability to produce the Airmen we need.” 

The DSD application window is open through May, with the matching process beginning in June. 

To view the full thread, click **here**.

FSUSAFAFAir ForceDSDdevelopmental special dutyAETCAir Education and Training CommandRedditAMATwitterSocial MediaAFPCAir Force Personnel Center
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Defense Innovation, Defender 23, Prepping the LinePublished May 19, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall talks about the future of innovation and collaboration with partners and allies, the Air Force supports Defender 23, an Army-led international exercise in Europe, and new supervisors have an additional resource to ready themselves for taking care of Airmen. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



CSAF 



SecAF 



: innovation 



Gen. C.Q. Brown Jr. 



Frank Kendall 



Ash Carter 



Ash Carter Exchange 



modernization 



DefenderEurope 



DEFENDER23 



Airman Leadership School 



enlisted force development 



ALS 



front line 



supervisors 



Prepping the Line 



USAFE 



DAF 



USAFE-AFA SECDEF 



AMC 



AETC Related Links
        DAF senior leaders offer dialogue on defense innovation amid strategic competition
            
            U.S.-based Air Force mobility aircraft supporting DEFENDER 23 exercise in Europe
            
            ‘Prepping the Line’ provides additional resources, training for supervisors
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHNNY A. FOSTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1501

[August 26, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 561993CF002780A.

Johnny A. Foster, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  VERITEC INC.
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Van Thuy Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Veritec Inc. (the "Company") has executed this Certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the
12th day of August, 2003.

                                            /s/ Van Thuy Tran
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Van Thuy Tran
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                             680,505
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      232,487
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        62,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   991,565
<PP&E>                             12,033,049
<DEPRECIATION>                     (4,012,618)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     9,163,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              571,795
<BONDS>                            664,169
<COMMON>                           8,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        818
<OTHER-SE>                         7,917,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       9,163,220
<SALES>                            1,781,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1,834,074
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      748,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   2,040,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (115,097)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (955,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (955,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (955,862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.09)


</TABLE>
#### McCormack & Wainright v. M. C. Bignall & Co.

(No. 792, Op. Book No. 2, p. 267.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 760. *Fraudulent assignment; continuance of the business by assignor; reservations in favor of assignor.*Whether the deed of assignment from Mathews to appellants was so intended by the parties to it or not, it is in law fraudulent as to its effect upon prior creditors. 1st. Because it provides for a continuance of the business of Mathews by the appellants, his assignees, instead of a prompt realization of the property assigned, or the proceeds arising from a sale of it, to the payment of the debts of the assignor; and 2d. It reserves to the assignor the right to defeat its operations by substituting other assignees under certain contingencies mentioned in it. In either case, the natural result and legal effect of the ■deed of assignment would be to hinder and delay, if not *418to defraud, creditors. Such being the case, the deed was properly held to be void. [R. S. 2465; Van Hook v. Walton, 28 Tex. 59; Peiser & *Co.*v. Petticolas, 50 Tex. 638.]

March 20, 1880.

Affirmed.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# HH-60 helicopter crashes near Camp Hansen, Okinawa

              - Published  Aug. 5, 2013

**KADENA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --  **
A Kadena-based HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter crashed in the Central Training Area near Camp Hansen, Okinawa, at about 4 p.m. Aug. 5. U.S. fire and rescue crews are responding to the scene of the mishap.There were at least four people on board, and their status is unknown at this time. At the time of the mishap, the helicopter was conducting a local training mission.The cause of the incident will be investigated. More details will be released as they become available.

*(Information courtesy of 18th Wing Public Affairs)*

aircraft mishapHH-60

#             Related Links        

-  HH-60G Pave HawkFeb. 4, 2004                                    ​The primary mission of the HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter is to conduct day or night personnel recovery operations into hostile environments to recover isolated personnel during war.                                 
-  Three of four crew members accounted for after crash
# United State s Court of Appeals For the F irst Circuit

No. 10-2151 D. CHARLES DI CKOW, as Ex ecutor of the Estate of Ma

rg aret W. Dickow, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES; I

NTERNAL

REVENUE SERVI CE, Def endants, Appe llees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on August 19, 2011, is amended as follows. On page 12, line 3, "©" is deleted and replaced with "(c)". On page 14, line 19, "©" is deleted and replaced with "(c)". On page 17, line 11, replace "refund cases." with "refund cases. See Oropallo, 994 F.2d at 31."
#### E. Engel v. Chas. Brown.

*(No. 1206, Op. Book No. 2,*p. *486.)*

Appeal from Eayette County.

January 28, 1882.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 803. *Plea that party is sued out of his precinct must he made in justice’s court before an answer to the merits.*Appellant sued appellee in justice’s court. Appellee answered to the merits in that court, and upon a trial appellant recovered a judgment. Appellee appealed to the county court, and in that court, for the first time, pleaded that he had been sued out of the precinct in which he resided, and upon this ground moved to dismiss the suit, which motion was sustained. *Held,*this was error. This plea must be always interposed in the justice’s court before an answer to the merits, and cannot be made for the first time in the county court. The answer to the merits gave the comt jurisdiction of the person.

Reversed and remanded.
[No. 44274-1-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage*of Karen Shanks, *Respondent,*and John W. McDaniel, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 85-3-02062-0, Glenna Hall, J., entered February 16, 1999. *Remanded*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Agid, A.C.J., and Appelwick, J.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 4.1

                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
                              THE STATE OF MARYLAND

  NUMBER                                                              SHARES

----------                                                          ----------

                               AmericasBank Corp.
                             A Maryland Corporation

                  Authorized: 5,000,000 Shares of Common Stock

This is to Certify that _____________ is the owner of ___________ fully paid and
non-assessable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of
the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney
upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.
Dated:____________


-------------------------                 --------------------------------------
Secretary                                 Chairman


REVERSE SIDE

     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of
this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common            UNIF GIFT
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties    MIN ACT - .........Custodian..........
JT TEN  - as joint tenants with right                 (Cust)            (Minor)
          of survivorship and not as               under Uniform Gifts to Minors
          tenants in common                        Act.............
                                                         (State)

     Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

     For value received, _________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto (PLEASE
INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE)_________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIPCODE OF
ASSIGNEE)

<PAGE>


_________________________________ Shares represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ________________ Attorney to
transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation, with full
power of substitution in the premises.

Dated _______________________  _____
       In presence of

-------------------------                 --------------------------------------
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DARRYL TICE.

January 31, 1984.

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted and the November 18, 1983 order of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Division to permit the record to be supplemented by filing defendant’s affidavit; and it is further

ORDERED that the State may supplement the record in opposition to defendant’s affidavit.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4556]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    MORE ON REPUBLICANS AND MEDICARE

  (Mr. WISE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. WISE. Mr. Speaker, I could not let the last Republican speaker 
pass unchallenged who says we are really going to increase Medicare. 
Well, I guess it is sort of like Medicare, you are going to get the 
same level of services, but we are going to cut you back a significant 
percent.
  If it is going to then be increased, why it is so many senior 
citizens understand that they are going to lose on the average $900 a 
year? The real concern I have is, why is this being done?
  Is it being done to help Medicare? It is not being done to help 
Medicare. It is being done to pay for the tax cut. That is right, the 
tax cut for the wealthiest individuals in this country where 51 percent 
of the benefits of that tax cut go to those earning over $100,000. The 
only problem is, if you are going to balance the budget, you have to 
make up for the over $300 billion of lost revenue that is going to come 
because of that tax cut.
  Where does it come from? Out of the hide of Medicare, out of the hide 
of senior citizens and out of the hide of health care.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 CMSAF Bass visits Ramstein AB, holds all-callPublished Dec. 3, 2021
                        
                        By Senior Airman John R. Wright
                        
                        
                        86th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                **Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass** visited **Ramstein Air Base**, Nov. 29–Dec. 1.
During her visit, Bass recognized outstanding **Operation Allies Welcome** performers from the **86th Airlift Wing**, 435th Air Ground Operations Wing and 521st Air Mobility Operations Wing. Bass listened to Airmen discuss their roles during OAW and asked them to share their personal experiences.A military member speaking in front of a crowd.Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass speaks with Airmen during an all-call at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, Dec. 1, 2021. While stationed at Ramstein AB, Bass worked for the 86th Operations Support Squadron and 86th Operations Group. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Taylor Slater)
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res
    
    Military members greeting each other with a fist-bump.Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass meets with Airmen at the Joint Mobility Processing Center during her visit to Ramstein Air Base, Germany, Dec. 1, 2021. Bass listened to Airmen discuss their roles during Operation Allies Welcome and asked them to share their personal experiences. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman John R. Wright)
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res
    
    A group of military members standing around one military member.Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass meets with Airmen at the 521st Air Mobility Operations Wing hangar during her visit to Ramstein Air Base, Germany, Dec. 1, 2021. Airmen presented capabilities displays to Bass, going over the accomplishments and lessons learned during Operation Allies Welcome. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman John R. Wright)
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res

Bass also discussed Air Force initiatives, lines of effort and plans for the future.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



CMSAF 



Ramstein AB 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force 



visit 



tour 



One Air Force 



Airmen 



readiness 



leadership 



Germany 



86th AW 



all-call 



JoAnne S. Bass
#### Luke Mathews v. F. L. Denison.

(No. 2445, Op. Book No. 2, p. 615.)

Appeal from Bell County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1256. *Venue, where note is payable at a certain place; vendee of property incumbered by*lien, *necessary party in suit to foreclose lien; decree in such case.*Denison sued one McG-ee on three notes, and sought to foreclose a lien on a printing press, material, etc., in the possession of Mathews, alleging that Mathews had acquired possession thereof with notice of plaintiff’s lien thereon. Mathews was made a defendant in the suit. *730The notes were made payable at Belton, Texas, and it was alleged in the petition that Belton was in Bell county, Texas. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against McGee for the amount of the notes, and as to him the lien upon the press, etc., was established and foreclosed, and an order of sale ordered to issue directing the seizure and sale of the same. As to Mathews, the judgment of the court was that plaintiff take nothing by suit, and that Mathews go hence, etc., and recover his costs, etc. Mathews alone appealed. Held, 1. The suit was properly instituted in Bell county, the notes being made payable there. 2. Mathews was a necessary party to the suit in so far as the plaintiff sought to foreclose the lien upon the property in his possession, and claimed by him. 3. Looking to the entire decree, it is doubtful as to what the court intended to accomplish by it. It adjudged that the plaintiff recover nothing of Mathews, and that he go hence and recover his costs. The lien is only foreclosed as to McGee, while the sheriff is commanded to seize and sell the property as under execution. If, as a matter of fact, Mathews purchased the property in good faith, for a valuable consideration, and without notice of Denison’s lien, he would certainly hold the property against that lien, and could not be disturbed in liis possession by reason of the same.

June 14, 1882.

Reversed and remanded.
#### M. J. Morris v. C. W. Wood.

(No. 1150, Op. Book No. 3, p. 338.)

Appeal from Delta County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1311. *Consolidation of suits; is discretionary with the court.*Appellee brought two suits in justice’s court against appellant, one to recover a horse valued at $50, in which a writ of sequestration was sued out and levied upon the horse, and the other suit was upon an account.' *763Upon motion of appellee, over the objection of appellant, the justice consolidated the two suits, and upon appeal the county court refused to disturb the consolidation or to dismiss the suit because of it, but rendered judgment in favor of appellee. *Held,*it would have been more regular to have refused to consolidate the two suits. The question presented, however, is as to whether the consolidated suit should have been dismissed on account of a misjoinder of causes of action. The question of multifariousness or misjoinder of causes of action in the same suit must be left to the discretion of the court trying the case, and that discretion will only be reviewed when a palpable abuse thereof is shown by the record. [Degress v. Hubbard et al., Sup. Court, Austin Term, 1881, unpublished.] In this case there is no such palpable abuse of the discretion made to appear.

December 14, 1881.

Affirmed.