alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 13, 2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection
with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors
Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further
certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from September 13, 2011 through
December 31, 2011, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  |  | 
|By: /s/ James
Fehleison              |  |  |  |  |  | Dated: March 29, 2012
|James Fehleison                      |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|Executive Vice President,            |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|Accounting Corporate Controller      |  |  |  |  |  |
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force, EPA and Florida sign agreement for Tyndall AFB cleanup

              - Published  Sept. 20, 2013

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The Air Force, Environmental Protection Agency and State of Florida signed a federal facilities agreement Sept. 20 that will provide the framework within which the parties will manage any necessary action to continue to protect the community and the environment at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla.

 “With the signing of the federal facility agreement, the three agencies have committed to work closely together to align project goals, facilitate exchange of information and ensure public participation for the benefit of all parties involved,” said Gerald F. “Fred” Pease Jr., the deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health.

 The Air Force will clean the sites to Florida state and federal standards, which are protective of human health and the environment, and complete the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA process in an expeditious and cost-effective manner.

“I believe this is a major milestone in the environmental restoration of a federal installation located in one of the most ecologically sensitive areas of our state, and I am very thankful to the Air Force and the U.S. EPA that we can finally move ahead as a team in addressing environmental issues at Tyndall Air Force Base,” said Jorge Caspary, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Waste Management Division director. “This agreement will also provide an economic boost to the area as professional engineers and scientists will be procured to remediate this site.”

 The Tyndall Federal Facility Agreement underscores the parties' commitment to do what is necessary to ensure environmental protection and responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars, Pease said.

 For more information call the Air Force Civil Engineer Center Public Affairs hotline at 210-925-0956.

Air Force Civil Engineer CenterTyndall Air Force Base

#             Related Links        

-  Tyndall Air Force Base website 
-  Air Force Civil Engineer Center website
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4915]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               MEMORIALS

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       80. By the SPEAKER. Memorial of the Legislature of the 
     State of New Hampshire, relative to recommendations of the 
     Northern Forest Lands Council; to the Committee on 
     Agriculture.
       81. Also, memorial of the General Assembly of the State of 
     Indiana, relative to the titling of rebuilt and salvaged 
     motor vehicles; to the Committee on Commerce.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OTIS TERRELL.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 31, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0449

Lower Tribunal No. F97-36875

________________

Judge Brandon,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge.

Judge Brandon, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DIOR EMFINGER, )

Appellant, )

)

V. ) C.A. No.: N16A-04-007(ALR)

)

DIVISION OF UNEMPLOYMENT )

INSURANCE, )

AND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE )

APPEALS BOARD, )

Appellees. )

ORDER OF REMAND

WHEREFORE, the Court hereby finds that justice requires remand to the 

Division of Unemployment Insurance for consideration of the issues on the merits 

consistent with the strong policy in favor of deciding cases on the merits as 

opposed to technical grounds.1

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that this case is remanded to the Division of Unemployment Insurance. 

Andrea L. Rocanelli

______________________

Hon. Andrea L. Rocanelli

 

1 Keener v. Isken, 58 A.3d 407, 409 (Del. 2013).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         204,704
<SECURITIES>                                    22,812
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,807,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   598,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,043,472
<PP&E>                                         241,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,427,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,756,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,768,401
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,427,680
<SALES>                                      2,039,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,071,446
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,963,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Monroe Capital Corporation (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore L. Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Aaron D. Peck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 7, 2014 /s/ Theodore L. KoenigTheodore L. Koenig Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer) Monroe Capital Corporation /s/ Aaron D. PeckAaron D. Peck Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Monroe Capital Corporation
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# F-15C crashes over Shenandoah Valley

              - Published  Aug. 27, 2014

**BARNES AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --  **
At approximately 9:05 a.m. today the 104th Fighter Wing lost radio contact with an F-15C aircraft during a cross country mission over the Shenandoah Valley Virginia.  

 

The pilot flying the F-15C made a report of an inflight emergency prior to radio contact being lost.  Subsequently there were reports of dark smoke being seen around the aircrafts last known whereabouts.   Local law enforcement arrived on scene and confirmed the aircraft crashed. 

 

"Information on this incident is developing rapidly and we are not going to speculate on what occurred or the status of the pilot", said Col James Keefe, 104th Fighter Wing Commander.  "We are hopeful that the pilot is ok, and the pilot will be in our thoughts and prayers as the events of this incident unfold."

 

The F-15C aircraft was in route to receive a system upgrade, and there were no munitions on the aircraft during this cross-country trip.   

 

At this point the status of the pilot is not confirmed.

 

crashShenandoah ValleyBarnes ANGBMass.104th Fighting WingF-15C
#### IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE AND LAMBERTVILLE POLICEMEN’S ASSOCIATION.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RCPI TRUST'S
BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND RCPI TRUST'S STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          60,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,810
<PP&E>                                         826,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,063)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 952,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,920
<BONDS>                                        617,777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     293,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   952,822
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES COLEMAN.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 43749-6-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### Kenneth Goodwin, *Appellant,*v. George W. Wright, et al., *Defendants,*Western National Assurance Company, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 93-2-04407-9, Joseph A. Thibodeau, J., entered June 25, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Baker and Appelwick, JJ. Now published at 100 Wn. App. 631.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0835-17T2

MICHAEL GUSTAFSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. as

Trustee for WAMU Mortgage

Pass-Through Certificates,

Series 2005-PR4 Trust,

Defendants-Respondents.

__________________________________

Submitted December 19, 2018 – Decided 

Before Judges Ostrer and Mayer.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law 

Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L-2496-15.

Stratton Stepp Ashtyani, LLP, attorneys for appellant 

(Nima Ashtyani, on the briefs).

Bertone Piccini, LLP, attorneys for respondents 

(Cristina Z. Sinclair, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

December 27, 2018
2

A-0835-17T2

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having 

stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is 

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Yang Chin Leong, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Asia Pacific Boiler Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Asia Pacific Boiler Corporation.  Dated: April 15, 2015/s/ Yang Chin LeongYang Chin LeongChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)Asia Pacific Boiler Corporation
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Asia Pacific Boiler Corporation and will be retained by Asia Pacific Boiler Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as In re O.B., 2022-Ohio-2914.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

IN RE:

O.B., et al.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NOS. CA2022-04-019

CA2022-04-021

CA2022-04-022

D E C I S I O N

8/22/2022

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

JUVENILE DIVISION

Case Nos. 21-D000060; 21-D000061; 21-D000062

Tibbs Law Office, LLC, and Sarah E. Michel, for appellant.

Ostrowski Law Firm, Co., L.P.A., and Andrea G. Ostrowski, for Mother.

Aaron Aldridge, for custodians.

Andrew J. Brenner, guardian ad litem.

David Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michelle Belknap, Assistant 

Prosecuting Attorney, for Warren County Children Services.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and 
Warren CA2022-04-019

CA2022-04-021

 CA2022-04-022

original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous.

M. POWELL, P.J., S. POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# DAF announces the 12 Outstanding Airmen for 2021

              - Published  July 12, 2021
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Kiana Pearson                                                    
              - Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **
Air Force officials have selected the service’s top enlisted members, naming the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year for 2021.An Air Force selection board at the **Air Force’s Personnel Center** considered 35 nominees who represented major commands, direct reporting units, field operating agencies and Headquarters Air Force. The board selected the 12 Airmen based on superior leadership, job performance and personal achievements.The 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year are (alphabetically, by command of assignment when selected):
            - Senior Master Sgt. Marcus D. Banks, Pacific Air Forces
            - Tech. Sgt. Christopher M. Bennett, Air Education and Training Command
            - Tech. Sgt. Justin D. Bennett, U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa
            - Tech. Sgt. Kelli A. Floyd, Air Combat Command
            - Staff Sgt. Valerie M. Graw, Air Force Materiel Command
            - Staff Sgt. Colleen F. Mitchell, Air Force District of Washington
            - Senior Airman Giovanni Pacheco, Airman Support U.S. Space Force
            - Staff Sgt. Kristy L. Riley, Air Force Reserve Command
            - Staff Sgt. Alex M. Sandmann, Air Force Global Strike Command
            - Senior Master Sgt. Mark R. Schneider II, Air National Guard
            - Senior Airman Jamonica M. Smith, Air Mobility Command
            - Master Sgt. Hannah E. Walters, Air Force Special Operations Command

The winners are authorized to wear the **Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon** with the bronze service star device on the ribbon. They are also authorized to wear the Outstanding Airman of the Year badge for one year from the date of formal presentation.The MAJCOM nominee list is available on **myPers** > Recognition >Special Trophies and Awards or select the active-duty enlisted category from the dropdown menu and search “12 OAY.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAETCAir Education and Training CommandAFPCAir Force’s Personnel Center12OAY12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 8


Vessel Inspection Alternatives

CFR Correction

    In Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 40, 
revised as of October 1, 2009, on page 88, in Sec.  8.420, paragraph 
(c) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  8.420  Classification society authorization to participate in the 
Alternate Compliance Program.

* * * * *
    (c) A recognized classification society:
    (1) Will be eligible to receive authorization to participate in the 
ACP only after the Coast Guard has delegated to it the authority to 
issue the following certificates:
    (i) International Load Line Certificate;
    (ii) International Tonnage Certificate;
    (iii) Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate;
    (iv) Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate; and
    (v) International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate; and
    (2) Must have performed a delegated function related to general 
vessel safety assessment, as defined in Sec.  8.100 of this part, for a 
two-year period.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-23172 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D