alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                                                                                         Exhibit 11


                                      ENGINEERED SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC.
                              STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                                     April 30                            April 30
                                                           ----------------------------        ----------------------------
                                                              2000              1999              2000              1999
                                                           ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
<S>                                                        <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
NET INCOME                                                 $2,570,099        $1,792,234        $5,144,370        $3,180,636
                                                           ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========


BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

    Average basic shares outstanding                        6,984,016         5,052,423         6,953,217         4,950,724
                                                           ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========


                                                                 $.37              $.35              $.74              $.64
                                                           ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

    Average basic shares outstanding                        6,984,016         5,052,423         6,953,217         4,950,724

    Net effect of dilutive stock options<F1>                  177,078           178,179           163,470           179,103
                                                           ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
                                                            7,161,094         5,230,602         7,116,687         5,129,827
                                                           ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

                                                                 $.36              $.34              $.72              $.62
                                                           ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

<FN>
<F1> Based on the treasury stock method.

</TABLE>
[No. 43555-8-I.

Division One.

May 15, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. P.N., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-8-05066-9, Carlos Y. Velategui, J. Pro Tern., entered September 29, 1998. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 Directorate leads KC-135 upgrade for Turkish Air ForcePublished Sept. 14, 2021
                        
                        By Brian Brackens
                        
                        
                        Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs
                **TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, Okla. (AFNS) --**
                The first of seven Turkish KC-135R Stratotanker aircraft recently returned to Turkey after receiving a major flight deck upgrade at Field Aerospace, Oklahoma City.
The upgrade, termed “Block 45,” completely remodeled the inside of the aircraft’s flight deck, with new liquid crystal displays, radio altimeter, computer module updates, autopilot, and a digital flight director, replacing approximately 63 parts to include analog instruments which are considered high-maintenance or obsolete altogether.
“Turkey is a key ally in a very strategically important part of the world,” said James Conley, a foreign military sales program manager within the Mobility and Training Aircraft Directorate’s Legacy Tanker Division, which is leading the effort to upgrade the Turkish KC-135 fleet. “Block 45 makes it so much easier for pilots to operate the aircraft and notice malfunctions faster. It also helps with sustainment of the aircraft in the long run.”
In fact, the U.S. Air Force’s **KC-135** fleet – which is also receiving the Block 45 modification – has seen an increase in aircraft availability due in part to the mod, said John Wilson, the directorate’s Block 45 program manager.
“Taking out old antiquated gauges and systems and bringing them up to date [with Block 45] has saved us thousands of [maintenance] hours a year,” Wilson said. “Prior to Block 45, our analog autopilot averaged 500 flight hours between failures. Now, we’re averaging 49,000 flight hours between failures.”
Prior to completing the update on the aircraft, the directorate worked with the Air Force Security Assistance and Training Squadron to coordinate Block 45 training for four Turkish Air Force pilots, so they would be fully qualified to fly the modified aircraft back to Turkey.
“With the ability to provide aerial refueling, aeromedical evacuations, and carry up to 83,000 pounds of cargo, the KC-135 is a key asset, and we – in partnership with Field Aerospace – are working hard to complete the updates and return the aircraft to Turkey as quickly as possible,” Conley said. “I’m thankful for the support of all of the folks involved in the success of this program, to include members of our Block 45 Turkey Air Force FMS Acquisition team.”
A second Turkish KC-135 is currently undergoing the new modification, with the remaining fleet expected to receive the update no later than 2023.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



SAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



KC-135R Stratotanker 



Turkish Air Force 



One Air Force 



Aircraft 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



AFLCMC 



Tinker AFB 



Field Aerospace 



Block 45 



Allies 



foreign military sales program 



upgrades
Exhibit 33.6



LOGO

MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE

WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

February 26, 2016

SunTrust
Bank (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR) (the
Applicable Servicing Criteria), for securitization transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after December 31, 2005 (the Platform). The Asserting Party is not assessing compliance with any other
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

The Asserting Party used the applicable criteria in paragraph (d) of
Title 17, Section 229.1122 of the CFR to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has concluded
that it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period).

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



|                                                                                       |  |                                                                                
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|SunTrust Bank
Solely with respect to Sections
229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)
|                                                                                       | 
|By:                                                                                    |  | LOGO                                                                           
|                                                                                       |  | Terri Stoots, Vice President,
Document Custody Services Date: February 26,
2016
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Donald E. Brown, M.D., certify that:

 

|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc.; |
|--|----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|--|----|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | 3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Donald E. Brown, M.D. 

Donald E. Brown, M.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

March 4, 2015

 

 

----
[No. 44766-1-I.

Division One.

April 17, 2000.]

#### Margaret I. Gay, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-2-01002-7, George N. Bowden, J., entered May 18, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 459 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.459

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
 To modify the boundary of the Minuteman Missile National Historic Site 
          in the State of South Dakota, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Minuteman Missile National Historic 
Site Boundary Modification Act''.
SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.
    Section 3(a) of the Minuteman Missile National Historic Site 
Establishment Act of 1999 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106-115) is 
amended--
        (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) 
    and (5), respectively; and
        (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
        ``(3) Visitor facility and administrative site.--
            ``(A) In general.--In addition to the components described 
        in paragraph (2), the historic site shall include a visitor 
        facility and administrative site located on the parcel of land 
        described in subparagraph (B).
            ``(B) Description of land.--The land referred to in 
        subparagraph (A) consists of--
                ``(i) approximately 25 acres of land within the Buffalo 
            Gap National Grassland, located north of exit 131 on 
            Interstate 90 in Jackson County, South Dakota, as generally 
            depicted on the map entitled `Minuteman Missile National 
            Historic Site Boundary Modification', numbered 406/80,011A, 
            and dated January 14, 2011; and
                ``(ii) approximately 3.65 acres of land located at the 
            Delta 1 Launch Control Facility for the construction and 
            use of a parking lot and for other administrative uses.
            ``(C) Availability of map.--The map described in 
        subparagraph (B) shall be kept on file and available for public 
        inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 
        Service.
            ``(D) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.--
        Administrative jurisdiction over the land described in 
        subparagraph (B) is transferred from the Secretary of 
        Agriculture to the Secretary, to be administered as part of the 
        historic site.
            ``(E) Boundary adjustment.--The boundaries of the Buffalo 
        Gap National Grassland are modified to exclude the land 
        transferred under subparagraph (D).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                    3,752,951
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               221,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                 103,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          4,084,735
<PP&E>                                   12,798,733
<DEPRECIATION>                           (5,497,410)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           12,572,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     1,266,852
<BONDS>                                   4,682,606
<COMMON>                                      8,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                     626
<OTHER-SE>                                6,613,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             12,572,174
<SALES>                                     412,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            412,811
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               447,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            741,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (291,984)        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (775,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (775,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              (775,901)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2011 between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC (LNR Partners) as successor Special Servicer to Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities
as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2014 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2014, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned
as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 27, 2015



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
EXHIBIT 34.2




[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Citibank, N.A.:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Chicago, Illinois


February 28, 2013
#### Western Union Telegraph Co. v. J. W. Catchpole.

(No. 2295, R. Book No. 4, p. 237.)

Appeal from Tarrant County.

November 15, 1882.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 268. *Right of company to limit its liability with, regard to unrepeated messages,*The blank message which was filled up by H. in the dispatch sent to 0., contained a printed contract, one of the stipulations of which was, “and the company will not hold itself liable for errors or delays in transmission or delivery of unrepeated messages. This message is an unrepeated message, and is delivered by request of the sender under the conditions named above.” In transmitting the dispatch, an error was committed in stating the amount offered by H. to C. to be $20 instead of “$12 for the season.” *Held,*that the case is similar, in its essential features, to the case of The Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Neill, 57 Tex. 283, and the principles of law therein enunciated are decisive of this case.

The message being unrepeated, then, under the contract and the law, the company would not be liable for an error in the transmission, unless in connection with, the error it is further shown that there was misconduct, fraud or want of due care on the part of the company, its agents or servants.

Beversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         323,641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,576,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,172,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,098,055
<PP&E>                                      56,165,067
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,414,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,176,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,690,613
<BONDS>                                     19,884,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,820,937
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,522,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,176,737
<SALES>                                     12,922,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,922,618
<CGS>                                       12,283,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,283,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             354,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (774,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (272,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (502,286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (502,286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5357]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Martini] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. MARTINI addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```