alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 181 (Monday, September 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.
    Name: University of Notre Dame Site Visit in Physics (1208).
    Date and Time: Tuesday, October 19, 2010; 8 a.m.-6 p.m.
    Wednesday, October 20, 2010: 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
    Place: University of Notre Dame, Indiana 46556.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kathleen McCloud, Program Director for Physics 
Education and Disciplinary Research, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8236.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide an oversight report on progress of 
research performed under a Cooperative Agreement with the National 
Science Foundation.

Agenda

Tuesday. October 19, 2010

    Open 8:15-10 JINA science overview talk and discussion.
    Closed 10:30-10:45 Executive Session.
    Open 10:45-12:15 JINA astrophysics highlights.
    Open 2-3 JINA nuclear Physics experiments.
    Closed 3:50-4:30 Executive Session.
    Open 4:30-6:30 Student Poster Session.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

    Closed 8:30-9:30 Executive Session.
    Open 10-11 Administrators and JINA Discussions.
    Closed 11-12 Executive Session and writing session.
    Open 1:30-2 Administrators and JINA discussions.
    Closed 2:30-4 Writing session and Close out.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal contains proprietary or 
confidential material including technical information; financial data, 
such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 15, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-23375 Filed 9-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4957]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Guam [Mr. Underwood] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. UNDERWOOD addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Registration
Statement No. 333-20343 of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate Account
A on Form N-4, of our report dated February 28, 2003 of First Fortis Life
Insurance Company Separate Account A relating to the financial statements as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to
the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of Additional
Information.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
December 4, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 435 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 435

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           November 17 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall on December 2, 2008, for 
 ceremonies and activities held in connection with the opening of the 
                 Capitol Visitor Center to the public.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Emancipation Hall may be used on December 2, 2008, for ceremonies 
and activities held in connection with the opening of the Capitol 
Visitor Center to the public. Physical preparations for such ceremonies 
and activities shall be carried out in accordance

              

 with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Tex. & Pacif. R. R. Co. v. W. H. Norton.

(No. 2553, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

May 2, 1883.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 403. *Suit on sworn account; right of defendant to file a counter affidavit for the first time on appeal in county court.*Norton sued on a verified account, in justice’s court; recovered a judgment, from which the railroad company appealed to the county court, and filed in that court a counter affidavit denying the justice and correctness of plaintiff’s account. Plaintiff moved to strike out the counter affidavit of defendant, because it had not been filed in justice’s court. This motion was sustained, and the court refused to permit defeiidant to introduce any evidence to disprove the account of plaintiff. *Held,*that though it be true that, on appeal in county courts from justice’s court, no new cause of action can be set up by plaintiff, and no set-off nor counterclaim not pleaded in justice’s court could be set up by defendant [Curry v. Terrell (Ct. App.), *ante,*p. 95], this would not prevent the filing of a counter affidavit which did not present or attempt to rely upon a set-off or counterclaim, but simply proposed to contest the account of plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Harry M. Neer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Rockport Healthcare, Group, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2004


/s/ Harry M. Neer
--------------------------------
Harry M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.1

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2015

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2011-2 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2015




---

<for SEMT 2011-2>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
September 27, 2011 (the Agreement); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 8, 2011, between DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated September 27, 2011 (the
Agreement).
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each of the foregoing an Agreement for purposes of this Servicer Compliance Statement.
| 1. | I am the Chief Financial Officer of chatAND, Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Attached to this certification is Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·    | The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·    | The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented. |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 12, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Steven Berger       |   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|           |   | Steven Berger           |   |
|           |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
383 Madison Avenue
31st Floor
New York, NY 10179


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2011:


(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee and/or Paying Agent under
the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period.


March 1, 2012

/s/ Judith J. Rishel
JUDITH RISHEL
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Cor

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
  Securities Trust 2011-C5,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
  2011-C5, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and Paying Agent, as applicable.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50385

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSHUA JERMAINE LOVETT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-59

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joshua Jermaine Lovett appeals the sentence imposed following the 

revocation of his prior terms of supervised release. He contends that the aboveguidelines sentence is plainly unreasonable because it was greater than 

necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

Specifically, Lovett argues that the sentence exceeded the punishment 

required to reflect the seriousness of his breach of trust and failed to account

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50385 Document: 00512938761 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2015
No. 14-50385

for his substance abuse problems, the support of his family, his vow not to get 

in trouble again, and the serious charges he faced in state court. Because he 

did not object to the reasonableness of his sentence after it was imposed, our 

review is limited to plain error. See United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 

259-60 (5th Cir. 2009).

The record reflects that the district court considered the recommended 

imprisonment range of 6 to 12 months, the 24 and 60-month statutory 

maximum terms of imprisonment, the nature and circumstances of Lovett’s

supervised release violations, Lovett’s substance abuse problems, the 

probation officer’s prior efforts to help Lovett during the supervised release 

term, Lovett’s pending state charges, and Lovett’s request that he not be 

sentenced to an additional term of supervised release. The district court 

ultimately concluded that concurrent terms of 24 months of imprisonment on 

Counts One and Three and an additional 36-month term of supervised release

on Count Three was appropriate based on the circumstances of the case and 

the § 3553(a) factors. We have routinely upheld revocation sentences 

exceeding the recommended range, even where the sentence is the statutory 

maximum. United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 332 (5th Cir. 2013). 

Although sentences should be based on individualized assessments of the facts 

in each case, Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 50 (2007), there is nothing in 

the record to indicate that Lovett’s case presents an exception to this general 

rule. Because Lovett has failed to show that his revocation sentence is plainly 

unreasonable or plainly erroneous, see id. at 326, 332-33, the district court’s 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-50385 Document: 00512938761 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2015
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish 

the Electoral College and provide for the direct election of the President 

and Vice President by the popular vote of all citizens of the United 

States regardless of place of residence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to abolish the Electoral College and provide for 

the direct election of the President and Vice President 

by the popular vote of all citizens of the United States 

regardless of place of residence. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 36 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President and Vice President shall 

5 be elected jointly by the direct vote of the citizens of the 

6 United States, without regard to whether the citizens are 

7 residents of a State. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. The persons having the greatest number 

9 of votes for President and Vice President shall be elected, 

10 so long as such persons have a majority of the votes cast.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Recruiter Health Care, Better EOD Robots, Ejection Seat TestingPublished Feb. 2, 2024
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Vernon Young
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week's look around the Air Force highlights an effort to provide better healthcare solutions for recruiters in remote locations, an upgrade to explosive ordnance disposal robots and testing of a new ejection seat configuration for the new T-7A trainer aircraft. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Brittain Crolley)



01:59


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



Recruiting Healthcare 



EOD 



T7A Red Hawk 



Department of Defense Related Links
        Air Force tests Ejection Seat Drogue Chute for T-7A Red Hawk
            
            New system seeks to upgrade explosive ordnance disposal robots, aid technicians
            
            Leaders join forces to improve health care access for military recruiters, families
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6600
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARL ANTHONY SMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-94-1) Submitted: July 2, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Anthony Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carl Anthony Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In addition to the reasoning of the district court, see United States v. Smith , No. CR-94-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2003), we further find that Amendment 640 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(a)(3) is a substantive amendment and that the Sentencing Commission did not intend that it be retroactively applied. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED