alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 377 

To add the 9/11 Health and Compensation Programs to the list of exempt 

programs under PAYGO. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2013 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To add the 9/11 Health and Compensation Programs to 

the list of exempt programs under PAYGO. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Never Forget 9/11 He5 roes Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO EXEMPT PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 255(g)(1)(B) of the Bal8 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 

9 (2 U.S.C. 905(g)(1)(B)) is amended by— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 377 IS

1 (1) inserting after the item relating to Retire2 ment Pay and Medical Benefits for Commissioned 

3 Officers, Public Health Service the following: 

4 ‘‘September 11th Victim Compensation 

5 Fund (15–0340–0–1–754).’’; and 

6 (2) inserting after the item relating to the Vol7 untary Separation Incentive Fund the following: 

8 ‘‘World Trade Center Health Program 

9 Fund (75–0946–0–1–551).’’. 

10 (b) FISCAL YEAR 2014.—If the amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) takes effect after the date the President has 

12 issued the final sequester order for fiscal year 2014, the 

13 President shall revise the order to account for the amend14 ment and issue a new order. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7119]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

  At 4:19 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Ms. Goetz, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
agreed to the following concurrent resolution; in which it requests the 
concurrence of the Senate:

       H. Con. Res. 67. Concurrent resolution setting forth the 
     congressional budget for the United States Government for 
     fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

                          ____________________
```
```

  EX-34.4
(logo) plante moran

Plante & Moran, PLLC
Suite 2700
225 W. Washington St.
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.899.4460
Fax: 312.726.3262
plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the National
Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December
31, 2011. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) are applicable to the
activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.
The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the
Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company
processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance
activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not
include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that
may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December. 31,
2011 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

Chicago,IL
January 16, 2012

(logo) Praxity
MEMBER
GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF
INDEPENDENT FIRMS
```
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed December 4, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00312

- CV

ARTIS GRANVILLE , Appellant

V. JENNIFER CASTILLO , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 17

- 05058

- C



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Boatright Before the Court is appellant’s November 21, 2018 “Notice of Nonsu it Without
Prejudice” in which he states he no longer wishes to prosecute this case. We construe the notice

as a motion to dis miss the appeal. W e grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

180312F.P05 /Jason Boatright/ JASON BOATRIGHT JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ARTIS GRANVILLE, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 00312

- CV V.

JENNIFER CASTILLO, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 17

- 05058

- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Boatright. Justices Lang and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee JENNIFER CASTILLO recover he r costs of this appeal from appellant ARTIS GRANVILLE.

Judgment entered this 4th day of December, 2018.
News United States Air Force
 AFIMSC provides link to April 21 I-WEPTAC live streamPublished April 18, 2021
                        
                        By Joe Bela
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Department of Defense members can view a live stream of the 2021 Installation and Mission Support Weapons and Tactics Conference outbrief held April 21 at **Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland**.The virtual presentation takes place from 8 a.m. to noon CDT and can be accessed with a valid DoD Common Access Card at the **outbrief live stream**.Hosted by the **Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center**, the annual conference is the Air Force’s premiere innovation forum for members of the installation and mission support community. It draws experts from the various Air and Space Force support core functions to address mission shortfalls and propose solutions.Except for 2020, AFIMSC has held I-WEPTAC annually since 2017 to leverage the expertise of Airmen who form cross-functional teams called Mission Area Working Groups. MAWG team members study, develop and recommend courses of action for specific mission topics.Those who attend the virtual event will see the four teams present Air Force senior leaders with their solutions to some of the Air and Space Force's most pressing Agile Combat Support challenges.This year’s topics are:Right Size the Foundation: Optimize Installation & Mission Support for the Air Force We NeedStrategic Mission Dependency Index for Targeted National Defense Strategy InvestmentSupply Chain Vulnerabilities in the Future “Way We Fight”Institutionalize Readiness as a Foundational Competency to Develop Mission-Ready AirmenFor more information and to learn about past years’ solutions, some of which are being tested now for Air Force implementation, visit the I-WEPTAC web page at **https://www.afimsc.af.mil/News/I-WEPTAC/**.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center 



AFIMSC 



I-WEPTAC 2021 



Agile Combat Support 



innovation 



Conference 



outbriefs 



challenges 



solutions
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 32,613

5 MATTHEW C. STURGEON,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY

8 Karen L. Parsons, District Judge 

9 Gary K. King, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM 

11 for Appellee

12 Gary C. Mitchell

13 Ruidoso, NM 

14 for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 VANZI, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge

11 _________________________________

12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# F-15EX Eagle II unveiled as newest fighter

              - Published  April 7, 2021
              -                             By 1st Lt. Karissa Rodriguez                                                    

**EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --  **
Today marks the unveiling of the name and the official role of the Air Force’s newest fighter, the F-15EX Eagle ll.**Lt. Gen. Duke Richardson**, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics military deputy, presented the **F-15EX** during an unveiling and naming **ceremony** at **Eglin Air Force Base**, April 7.“Undefeated in aerial combat, the F-15 Eagle epitomized air superiority in the minds of our enemies, allies, and the American people for over 45 years, but it was not meant to fly forever. We heard the demand signal from our warfighters,” Richardson said. “I’m pleased to say we’ve responded boldly and decisively, with a proven platform that’s modernized and optimized to maintain air superiority now and into the future.”The ceremony celebrated the historic arrival of the dynamic new fighter aircraft. This process began several years ago, as a combined Air Force effort to bring the best in response capability.“Team Eglin and the **96th Test Wing** are proud to be a part of the rich history of this legendary aircraft,” said **Brig. Gen. Scott Cain**, 96th Test Wing commander.The EX provides a unique opportunity for the test enterprise as it is the first Air Force aircraft to be completely tested and fielded through combined developmental and operational test efforts.The official role of the EX is to meet capacity requirements while bringing diverse technology ensuring the platform's relevance for decades to come.The 96th TW and the **53rd Wing** are set to begin test and evaluation efforts. The 85th Test and Evaluation Squadron will work closely with the 40th Flight Test Squadron to integrate testing, from start to finish.The Air Force will procure up to 144 F-15EXs from Boeing, to replace F-15C/D models. The goal is to increase the F-15 fleet fighter readiness.The **173rd Fighter Wing** at Kingsley Field Air National Guard Base, Oregon is in line to become the first **F-15EX formal training unit** in 2024. The first operational F-15EX squadron will function in the Oregon ANG for critical homeland defense alert missions.“Since 1985 the F-15 has had a home in the Guard and Guard Airmen have flown these amazing aircraft both in the defense of the homeland and in every major international conflict since the first Gulf War in 1991,” said**Lt. Gen. Michael Loh**, ANG director.  “Now that is the battle-tested legacy of Guard F-15s – first to the fight, always ready and always there.”

LRUSAFAFAir ForceF-15EXEagle IIAFMCAir Force Materiel CommandEglin AFBnaming96th Test WingAircraftreadiness
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Operation Christmas Drop 2023Published Dec. 15, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Stephani Barge
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week’s look around the Air Force highlights Operation Christmas Drop 2023, a humanitarian event that brings the U.S. and partner nations together to deliver essentials to remote islands in the Indo-Pacific region. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Operation Christmas Drop 



OCD 



OCD23 



PACAF 



C-130H 



C-130J 



elephant walk 



International Observer Program 



Andersen Air Force Base 



interfly 



international 



multi-national 



Joint Force 



airdrop 



Humanitarian 



disaster relief 



Indo-Pacific 



Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV Related Links
        Operation Christmas Drop 2023: Pacific Air Forces preparing to deliver humanitarian assistance
            
            International observers in multinational harmony at Operation Christmas Drop 2023
            
            Operation Christmas Drop 2023 ends with Allied elephant walk, formation flight over the Pacific
Opinion filed September 15, 2017



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____


### No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 217

- C V

_____ _ _____



### IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.O. AND S.B.O ., CHILD REN

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Ector County, Texas
T rial Court Cause No. CC

- 3556

- PC

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellan t
, the mother of S.M.O. and S.B.O., ha s filed in this court a m otion

to dismis s h er appeal

. In the motion, Appellant requests that this court withdraw her
notice of appeal and dismiss this appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and th e appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

September 15 , 2017
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
EXHIBIT 32.b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westwood One, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael L. Zapf, Controller of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/S/    MICHAEL L.
ZAPF
|Michael L. Zapf       
|November 9, 2009      



|* | This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EX-4.9



 Exhibit 4.9 

FORM OF BENEFICIAL OWNER ELECTION 

The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed materials referred to therein relating to the distribution by Sears
Holdings Corporation, to the holders of record of its common stock, as of the close of business on October 30, 2014, at no charge, of transferable subscription rights (“Rights”) to purchase units (each, a “Unit”) for a
subscription price of $500 each, each of which consists of (a) $500 in principal amount of 8.0% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (“Notes”) and (b) 17.5994 warrants (each, a “Warrant”), with each Warrant entitling the
holder thereof to purchase one share of Sears Holdings Common Stock (the “Rights Offering”). 
 With respect to any instructions
to exercise (or not to exercise) Rights, the undersigned acknowledges that this form, together with a properly completed and executed IRS Form W-9 or W-8 (as applicable), must be completed and returned such that it will actually be received by you
by 4:00 p.m., New York City time, on November 13, 2014, the third trading day prior to the scheduled expiration date of the Rights Offering of November 18, 2014 (which may be extended by Sears Holdings Corporation). 

This will instruct you whether to exercise Rights to purchase Units consisting of Notes and Warrants held by you for the account of the
undersigned, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-199475) (the “Registration Statement”) and the prospectus supplement, dated October 30, 2014 (the
“Prospectus Supplement”), and the related “Instructions for Use of Sears Holdings Corporation Subscription Rights Certificates.” 
 Box
1.  ̈ Please DO NOT EXERCISE RIGHTS for the Units consisting of Notes and Warrants. 
 Box 2.  ̈ Please EXERCISE RIGHTS for the Units consisting of Notes and Warrants as set forth below. 
 The
number of Rights for which the undersigned gives instructions for exercise under the Basic Subscription Right (as described in the Prospectus Supplement) should not exceed the number of Rights that the undersigned is entitled to exercise. 

 

											
	 	  	 Number of Units
	  	Subscription Price	 	  	Payment	 
	 Basic Subscription Right:
	  	x	  	 	$[    ]=	  	  	 	$(Line 1)	  
	 Over-Subscription Privilege:
	  	x	  	 	$[    ]=	  	  	 	$(Line2)	  
		  	Total Payment Required	  				  	 
 
 
 	$(Sum of Lines 1 and
2 must equal total of
amounts in Boxes 3
and 4.)	  
  
  
  

 Box 3.  ̈ Payment in the following amount is enclosed
$            . 
 Box 4.  ̈ Please deduct payment
from the following account maintained by you as follows: 

					
	  
	 	  	 	  

	Type of Account	 		 	Account No.
			
	Amount to be deducted:	 	$	 	
                     
                                         
                         

		 		 	  

		 		 	  

		 		 	Signatures(s)
			
		 		 	Please type or print name(s) below:
		 		 	  

		 		 	  

	Date:                     , 2014
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
J.N.J., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2927 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 7, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Scott Brownell, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                   AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany American Business Financial
Services, Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ending September 30, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I,
Anthony J. Santilli, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 13, 2002
#### CRISPIN RODRIGUEZ v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5357]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California [Mr. Kim] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. KIM addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. J. B. Mathews.

(No. —, Op. Book No. 1, p. 204.)

Appeal from Anderson County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 510. *Jurisdiction of court of appeals; amount of judgment, or amount in controversy.*Suit by appellee against appellant in justice’s court for an amount less *253than $100. On appeal to the county court, judgment was rendered for appellee against appellant for an amount less than $100, exclusive of interest and cost. *Held,*that as neither the amount in controversy in the suit, nor the amount of the judgment rendered in the county court, did exceed $100, the judgment of that court was final, and the court of appeals had no jurisdiction on appeal therefrom to revise it. [Const, art. Y, secs. 6, 16, 22; Silliman v. Eidman & Bro. *post,*p. 337.]

October 11, 1877.

Appeal dismissed.
#### ANNA SKURA v. JULIO ESPONOZA.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.