alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S.
Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 29, 2013
News United States Air Force
 AFRL designated as Quantum Information Science Research Center for Air, Space ForcePublished Aug. 10, 2021
                        
                        By Leslie Heck
                        
                        
                        Air Force Research Laboratory Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                A cryogenic refrigerator installed in the Quantum Information and Sciences Laboratory at AFRL’s Information Directorate in Rome, New York. The device is used by AFRL researchers to measure the energy and coherence times of superconducting quantum bits (qubits), two important characteristics that determine how long qubits can retain quantum information. (Courtesy photo)

    











The **Air Force Research Laboratory** is now designated as the Quantum Information Science Research Center for the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force.
This designation, signed by then Acting Secretary of the Air Force John P. Roth in an April 23 memorandum, gives AFRL the authority to achieve faster military capability based on quantum information science, said AFRL commander **Maj. Gen. Heather Pringle**.
“AFRL is extremely proud, and has been long-recognized at the national level for its deep technical expertise in QIS with far-ranging applications including clocks and sensors for quantum-enhanced positioning, navigation and timing, quantum communications and networks, and quantum computing,” Pringle said. “This designation allows AFRL to expand its collaborations across government, industry and academia, further accelerating the research, development and deployment of quantum technologies.”
To support these efforts, AFRL’s Information Directorate, located at Rome, New York, will receive fiscal year 2020 funds, granted under the Defense Quantum Information Science Research and Development Program and in accordance with the National Defense Authorization Act. The funds help the Rome Lab obtain partnerships to gain further knowledge from worldwide leaders in quantum science application, said Dr. Michael Hayduk, Information Directorate deputy director.
“With this designation, AFRL fully intends to further advance the application of quantum technologies across the Department of the Air Force,” Hayduk said. “AFRL will expand its global network of QIS collaborators by tapping into both industrial and university expertise. These partnerships are critical in not only accelerating the deployment of QIS technologies but also in developing the future workforce needed to meet emerging national security challenges.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFRL 



Air Force Research Laboratory 



Air Force Materiel Command 



Wright-Patterson AFB 



Quantum Information Science Research Center 



Quantum 



information 



science 



QIS
#### Maymore & Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.

(No. 499, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 474.)

Appeal from Falls County.

January 11, 1879.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 722. *Trial of the right of property; judgment in.*On failure of the claimants to establish their claim, the judgment should have been so rendered as to fix the lien covered by the attachment, and subjecting the property to sale to satisfy the demand of the plaintiffs in the suit out of which the attachment issued. On failure to return the property for that purpose, the law fixes the remedy against the obligors upon the claim bond. [Mardis v. Johnson, 43 Tex. 225.]

Reversed and remanded.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2263

In re: PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR. , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 3:18

- cv - 00311

- MHL

- RCY )

Submitted : April 10, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf petitions for a w rit of mandamus, alleging the district court has not filed certain motions in his case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to file the motions. “[M] andamus is a drastic remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). “Courts provide mandamus relief only when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires’; (2) petitioner has shown a ‘clear and indisputable’ right to the requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ ‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” Id. (quoting Cheney v.
U.S. Dist. Court , 542 U.S. 367, 380

- 81 (2004)). The writ of mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. Will v. United States , 389 U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). We have reviewed the district court’s docket and conclude that Sirleaf fails to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### January 22, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
MATTHEW A. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. ADAMS COUNTY COMBINED COURT, CO, Defendant - Appellee. No. 13-1463 (D.C. No. 1:13-CV-02945-LTB) D. Colorado

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before LUCERO , McKAY , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this court has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Matthew A. Smith, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s dismissal of the civil rights complaint he brought against Defendant, Adams County

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.Combined Court. Smith asserted his civil rights were violated by the Court’s rulings in a Colorado state proceeding. He sought relief in the form of monetary damages. The United States District Court for th e District of Colorado dismissed the complaint sua sponte , concluding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See McAlester v. United Air Lines, Inc. , 851 F.2d 1249, 1252 (10th Cir. 1988). Specifically, the court concluded Defendant , a state court, is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity and that immunity has not been waived. See , e.g. , Alabama v. Pugh , 438 U.S. 781, 782 (1978) (per curiam); Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1180 (10th Cir. 2002). After review of the appellate filings, the district court’s order, and the entire record, we affirmthe denial of Smith’s comp laint for substantially the reasons stated by the district court and conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous. Smith’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is deniedand he is ordered to pay any remaining balance of the appellate filing fee. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge

-2-
News United States Air Force
 PHOTO ESSAY: One team, one fightPublished Aug. 15, 2013
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                The 64th Agressor Squadron at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., are charged with preparing the combat air forces, joint and allied aircrews for tomorrow's victories with challenging and realistic threat replication, training, academics and feedback. 
 
The squadron operates 20 F-16C Fighting Falcons, providing a realistic, threat-representative, contested environment for US and coalition combat units to train against.
To keep those aircraft operating at optimum performance levels, member of the 57th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron accomplish on-equipment maintenance of including aircraft servicing, before and after flight inspections, launch and recovery, munitions loading and any unscheduled maintenance requirements that occur during the course of the flying day.
View the slideshow above to see how both units work to keep the mission running smoothly.F-16 Fighting Falcon 



crew chief 



64th Agressor Squadron 



Nellis Air Force Base 



Nevada 



57th Maintenance Squadron 



f-16
#### Wiley Jones v. W. W. Brazile.

(No. 2372, R. Book No. 4, p. 265.)

Appeal from Brown County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 299. *In suit upon a contract, quantum meruit not recoverable.*Suit was brought on an account due for *122services *“as per*contract.” The evidence proved the services rendered as claimed, but proved at the same time that the services were performed without any contract or understanding between the parties as to the amount of pay plaintiff was to receive. In other words, plaintiff sued upon a specific contract, and, failing to pi’ove such contract, has recovered upon a *quantum meruit.*This is error. The plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the cause of action declared upon. [Gammage v. Alexander, 14 Tex. 414; Chrisman v. Miller, 15 Tex. 160; Denison v. League, 16 Tex. 406; Lemmon v. Hanley, 28 Tex. 219; Hall & Jones v. Jackson, 3 Tex. 305.]

October 28, 1882.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1025]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    THE RIVER BEND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, NEIGHBORHOOD FINANCIAL 
             CORPORATION AND THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP

                                 ______

                            HON. GREG GANSKE

                                of iowa

                    in the house of representatives

                          Friday, May 12, 1995
  Mr. GANSKE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commend the River Bend 
Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Financial Corporation and the 
Principal Financial Group. This partnership has been recognized for its 
achievements in creating and implementing a comprehensive neighborhood 
action plan. The partnership is one of six partnerships in the United 
States which will receive Social Compact's 1995 Outstanding Community 
Investment Award.
  I had the pleasure and the privilege of visiting River Bend this past 
weekend. In the 6 years since the partnership began, this community 
which was once comprised of drug dealers, prostitutes and decaying and 
abandoned houses has become a neighborhood of homes and families. 
Residents are no longer afraid to walk down neighborhood streets and 
161 homes have been salvaged or reconstructed. Crime is down. Pride is 
up.
  Our country should follow River Bend's lead. This neighborhood is a 
prime example of how people can help themselves. River Bend was given a 
helping hand by the financial services industry, the City of Des 
Moines, and Polk County--not a handout by the Federal Government.
  I encourage more neighborhoods in our Nation to strive to accomplish 
the level of excellence which River Bend has achieved.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6700-S6701]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    ORDERS FOR TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1995

  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate 
completes its business today it stand in [[Page S6701]] recess until 
the hour of 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 1995; that following the 
prayer, the Journal of proceedings be deemed approved to date, the time 
for the two leaders be reserved for their use later in the day, and the 
Senate then immediately resume consideration of S. 534, the Solid Waste 
Disposal Act, under the previous order.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I now ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
stand in recess between the hours of 12:30 and 2:15 for the weekly 
policy luncheons to meet; further, that notwithstanding the recess of 
the Senate on Tuesday, all Members have until 2:30 p.m. to file any 
first-degree amendments to S. 395.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
#### Wooldridge & Harris v. Wm. H. Womack, Adm’r.

(No. 117, Op. Book No. 1, p. 487.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 338. *Answer; plea of failure of consideration.*The answer alleged that the note sued on was given for a tract of land of one hundred and seventy acres, sold and purchased at administrator’s sale. That the estate never had title to more than twenty-five acres, and that title to one hundred and forty-four and three-fourths acres had absolutely failed. Fraud and fraudulent representations practiced and made by the administrator, with regard to the title and- number of acres, were alleged in general terms. *Held,*the answer was not sufficient to defeat the rule of *caveat emptor,*as it obtains in administration sales. [Walton v. Reagar, 20 Tex. 103; Ward v. Williams, 45 Tex. 617.] A further defect in the answer is that it does not aver that the representations, however false and fraudulent, were relied on in the purchase by, and that they did actually deceive defendant. [Moreland v. Atchison, 19 Tex. 303; Luckie v. McClossin, 22 Tex. 282.]

§ 339. *Judgment for costs of both courts.*Plaintiff admits and claims, as a reason for his new suit, that the judgment he recovered in the justice’s court was a nullity, because that court had no jurisdiction. If so, he was to blame for all the costs which accrued therein, and *145he was not entitled to have judgment for such costs after defendant’s appeal from the justice’s judgment was consolidated with his new or second suit in the district court.

April 24, 1878.

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 SEAC, CMSAF, CMSSF discuss leading in a time of change at 2021 Virtual Aerospace Warfare SymposiumPublished Feb. 24, 2021
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Areca T. Wilson
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff**Ramón "CZ" Colón-López**, Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force **JoAnne S. Bass** and Chief Master Sgt. of the Space Force **Roger A. Towberman** took part in a virtual panel on leading in a time of change during the Air Force Association’s 2021 Virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium, Feb. 24.

During the discussion, the senior leaders took the opportunity to identify what must be done for the United States to stay ahead in the great power competition.

"The current (noncommissioned officers) watching this today, or the current (company grade officers) or (field grade officers) are going to be the same people who are perhaps sitting on these panels in AFA in 2030 and beyond, and we have a lot of work to do when it comes to making sure that we are modernizing all things," Bass said. "We have an opportunity now, more than ever, where we are at an inflection point, that we've got to get this right.”

Towberman agreed with Bass’ sentiments and emphasized the importance of equipping Guardians with the tools needed to support the mission.

"We're looking at wearable technologies, we're looking at different ways to monitor the mental health, spiritual health (and) physical health of the force," Towberman said. "As you come in and raise your hand and give a commitment that extends to death, the institution has to earn that level of commitment every day, so we really see these as institutional obligations to take care of folks.”

As the senior enlisted person in the U.S. Department of Defense, Colón-López discussed what it takes to identify issues around the joint force and how to develop the best solutions.

"The overarching theme has always been the same: Collaboration without encroachment," Colón-López said. "I see myself as a sensor, a synchronizer, and an integrator for the total force, and a lot of that comes with understanding the issues that are exclusive to the services. Everything that we do is with one ultimate goal, and that is to influence and to energize the force, to take the right course of action and make a difference for our service and the Department of Defense."

Several senior leaders and experts from across the Air Force and**Space Force** will appear during the Aerospace Warfare Symposium, which runs until Feb. 26. To view the symposium, register at **https://www.afa.org**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



SEAC 



CMSAF 



CMSSF 



vAWS2021 



discussion 



virtual panel 



Leading 



leading in a time of change 



One Air Force 



Aerospace Warfare Symposium 



readiness
422 A.2d 1164

#### Commonwealth v. Pierce, Appellant.

Submitted March 23, 1979.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Eric B. Henson’, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NOVA
INTERNATIONAL FILMS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY
31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                21,466
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      21,466
<PP&E>                                684
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        22,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 5,000
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            8,197,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          22,150
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (1,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (1,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,375,119
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,373,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.046)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.046)



</TABLE>
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2011:


(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Certificate Administrator under the
servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the reporting period.


March 1, 2012

/s/ Judith J. Rishel
JUDITH RISHEL
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for DBUBS 2011-LC3 Commercial Mortgage
  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-LC3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Certificate Administrator.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far