# Patent

## Title
Power output and fuel flow based probabilistic control in part load gas turbine tuning, related control systems, computer program products and methods

## Abstract

Various embodiments include a system having: at least one computing device configured to tune a set of gas turbines (GTs) by performing actions including: commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a base load level, based upon a measured ambient condition for each GT; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match a nominal mega-watt power output value, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT; adjusting an operating condition of each GT in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT at the part load level; and calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application relates to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,498, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,504, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,525, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,512, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,491 all filed concurrently herewith on Nov. 18, 2014.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The subject matter disclosed herein relates to tuning and control systems. More particularly, the subject matter disclosed herein relates to tuning and control systems for gas turbines.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
At least some known gas turbine engines include controllers that monitor and control their operation. Known controllers govern the combustion system of the gas turbine engine and other operational aspects of the gas turbine engine using operating parameters of the engine. At least some known controllers receive operating parameters that indicate the gas turbine engine's present operating state, define operational boundaries by way of physics-based models or transfer functions, and apply the operating parameters to the operational boundary models. Additionally, at least some known controllers also apply the operating parameters to scheduling algorithms, determining error terms, and controlling boundaries by adjusting one or more gas turbine engine control effectors. However, at least some operating parameters may be unmeasured parameters, such as parameters that may be impractical to measure using sensors. Some of such parameters include firing temperature (i.e., stage 1 turbine vane exit temperature), combustor exit temperature, and/or turbine stage 1 nozzle inlet temperature.
At least some known gas turbine engine control systems indirectly control or monitor unmeasured operating parameters using measured parameters, such as compressor inlet pressure and temperature, compressor exit pressure and temperature, turbine exhaust pressure and temperature, fuel flow and temperature, ambient conditions, and/or generator power. However, there is uncertainty in the values of indirect parameters, and the associated gas turbine engines may need tuning to reduce combustion dynamics and emissions. Because of the uncertainty of unmeasured parameters, design margins are used for gas turbine engines that include such known control systems. Using such design margins may reduce the performance of the gas turbine engine at many operating conditions in an effort to protect against and accommodate worst-case operational boundaries. Moreover, many of such known control systems may not accurately estimate firing temperature or exhaust temperature of the gas turbine engine, which may result in a less efficient engine and variation from machine-to-machine in facilities with more than one gas turbine engine.
It has proven difficult to reduce variation in firing temperature from machine-to-machine for industrial gas turbines. For example, firing temperature is a function of many different variables, including variations in the components of the gas turbine and their assembly. These variations are due to necessary tolerances in manufacturing, installation, and assembly of the gas turbine parts. In addition, the controls and sensors used to measure the operating parameters of the gas turbine contain a certain amount of uncertainty in their measurements. It is the uncertainty in the measurement system used to sense the values of the measured operating parameters and the machine component variations that necessarily result in variation of the unmeasured operating parameters of the gas turbine engine, such as the firing temperature. The combination of these inherent inaccuracies makes it difficult to achieve the design firing temperature of a gas turbine engine at a known set of ambient conditions and results in firing temperature variation from machine-to-machine.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Various embodiments include a system having: at least one computing device configured to tune a set of gas turbines (GTs) by performing actions including: commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a base load level, based upon a measured ambient condition for each GT; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match a nominal mega-watt power output value, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT; adjusting an operating condition of each GT in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT at the part load level; and calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value.
A first aspect includes a system having: at least one computing device configured to tune a set of gas turbines (GTs) by performing actions including: commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a base load level, based upon a measured ambient condition for each GT; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match a nominal mega-watt power output value, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT; adjusting an operating condition of each GT in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT at the part load level; and calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value.
A second aspect includes a computer program product having program code, which when executed by at least one computing device, causes the at least one computing device to tune a set of gas turbines (GTs) by performing actions including: commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a base load level, based upon a measured ambient condition for each GT; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match a nominal mega-watt power output value, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT; adjusting an operating condition of each GT in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT at the part load level; and calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value.
A third aspect includes a computer-implemented method of tuning a set of gas turbines (GTs), performed using at least one computing device, the method including: commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a base load level, based upon a measured ambient condition for each GT; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match a nominal mega-watt power output value, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT; adjusting an operating condition of each GT in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition; commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT at the part load level; and calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the invention, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a schematic illustration of a gas turbine engine (GT), including a control system, according to various embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of a control architecture that may be used with the control system of FIG. 1 to control operation of the GT, according to various embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 3 shows a graphical depiction of a probabilistic simulation of the operating states of a statistically significant number of GT engines of FIG. 1 using a model of the GT used by the control system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram illustrating a method according to various embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 5 shows a graphical depiction of a process illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG. 4, in a two-dimensional Mega-Watt-power v. Fuel Flow graph.
FIG. 6 shows a graphical depiction of a process illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG. 4, in a two-dimensional Mega-Watt-power v. Fuel Flow graph.
FIG. 7 shows a graphical depiction of a process illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG. 4, in a three-dimensional Mega-Watt-power v. Fuel Flow v. firing temperature (T4) graph.
FIG. 8 shows an illustrative environment including a control system according to various embodiments of the invention.



It is noted that the drawings of the invention are not necessarily to scale. The drawings are intended to depict only typical aspects of the invention, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements between the drawings.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As indicated above, subject matter disclosed herein relates to tuning and control systems. More particularly, the subject matter disclosed herein relates to tuning and control systems for gas turbines.
Probabilistic control is a methodology for setting the operating state of a gas turbine (GT) based upon measured output (in mega-watts, MW) mono-nitrogen oxides NO and NO2 (nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide), collectively referred to as NOx emissions, and fuel flow. As described herein, various embodiments provide tuning and control of a GT using measurements of output and fuel flow. Conventional approaches exist to calculate and tune control mechanisms where measurement errors (output measurements in MW) exist, but no conventional approaches are designed to account for and tune GT control functions in view of fuel flow measurements.
As used herein, term P50 GT or P50 machine refers to a mean (or, nominal) gas turbine or similar machine in a fleet. Parameters associated with this P50 measure are considered ideal, and are rarely if ever attained in an actual gas turbine. Other terms used herein can include: a) firing temperature (T4), which is the average temperature downstream of a first-stage nozzle, but upstream of the first rotating bucket in the turbine (e.g., GT); and b) T3.9, which is the combustion temperature in the gas turbine, and is higher than the firing temperature. The firing temperature, as is known in the art, cannot be measured, but is inferred from other measurements and known parameters. As used herein, the term, “indicated firing temperature” refers to the firing temperature as indicated by one or more components of control equipment, e.g., a control system monitoring and/or controlling GT components. The “indicated” firing temperature represents the best estimate of the firing temperature from conventional sensing/testing equipment connected with the GT control system.
Additionally, as described herein, the term “base load” for a particular gas turbine can refer to the maximum output of the gas turbine at rated firing temperature. Further, as described herein, and known in the art, base load for a given gas turbine will change based upon changes in ambient operating conditions. Sometimes base load is referred to as “Full Speed Full Load” in the art. Further, it is understood that NOx is sensitive to fuel composition, and as such, it is accounted for in any tuning processes conducted in a gas turbine (including tuning processes described herein).
According to various embodiments, an approach can include the following processes:
1) Commanding one or more gas turbines (e.g., in a fleet) to a designed base load (MW value, NOx value), based upon a measured ambient condition. As described herein, in an ideal situation, the GT(s) should, in an ideal scenario, converge to P50 (nominal) operating parameters, including a P50 MW (nominal output) value, a P50 fuel flow value and P50 NOx (emissions) value. However, as indicated herein, this does not occur in real-world operations;
2) Commanding the one or more GTs to adjust its output to match to P50 MW (nominal output) value, and measuring the actual fuel flow value. As noted herein, this process will likely help to bring each GT's actual fuel flow value closer to the P50 fuel flow value, but does not fully succeed in that goal. Additionally, this output adjustment does not address another concern, that being the elevated firing temperature relative to its desired level;
3) Adjusting each GT's operating condition based upon its difference (Delta Fuel Flow) between the measured actual fuel flow value (process 2) and the expected, P50 fuel flow value for the ambient condition. The Delta Fuel Flow value can be translated to a Delta MW value (representing the difference between the GT's actual output and the P50 MW level) for each GT using conventional approaches. In this process, each GT that deviates from the P50 MW value, has its operating condition adjusted by a fixed fraction of the Delta MW value (as converted from the Delta NOx value) such that it approaches and then reaches the Delta MW value for that GT. This adjustment will move each GT onto a line in MW/Fuel Flow space that is orthogonal to the P50 MW/P50 Fuel Flow characteristic for that GT. The above-noted general processes are described in further detail herein;
4) Commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT at the part load level. This process can include commanding each GT in the set of GTs to a series of distinct part load levels, and for each distinct part load level, measuring an actual fuel flow for each of the GTs; and
5) Calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value. This calibration process can be performed using several (e.g., 3 or more) part load condition data sets. In various embodiments, the measured fuel flow (and in some cases, NOx, MW output, etc.) for each GT at each part load level can be compared with an expected fuel flow, etc. for the model GT (developed in processes 1-3) at those part load levels. In the case that the measured fuel flow does not match the expected fuel flow (+/− an acceptable deviation), the process can include modifying the combustor tuning parameters, e.g., firing temperature, air/fuel ratio, etc. in order to bring the actual measured fuel flow closer to the expected fuel flow for each GT, as calculated in process 3.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part thereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific example embodiments in which the present teachings may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present teachings and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present teachings. The following description is, therefore, merely illustrative.
FIG. 1 shows a schematic illustration of a gas turbine engine (GT) 10 including a control system 18, according to various embodiments. In various embodiments, gas turbine engine 10 includes a compressor 12, a combustor 14, a turbine 16 drivingly coupled to compressor 12, and a computer control system, or controller 18. An inlet duct 20 to compressor 12 channels ambient air and, in some instances, injected water to compressor 12. Duct 20 may include ducts, filters, screens, or sound absorbing devices that contribute to a pressure loss of ambient air flowing through inlet duct 20 and into inlet guide vanes (IGV) 21 of compressor 12. Combustion gasses from gas turbine engine 10 are directed through exhaust duct 22. Exhaust duct 22 may include sound adsorbing materials and emission control devices that induce a backpressure to gas turbine engine 10. An amount of inlet pressure losses and backpressure may vary over time due to the addition of components to inlet duct 20 and exhaust duct 22, and/or as a result of dust or dirt clogging inlet duct 20 and exhaust duct 22, respectively. In various embodiments, gas turbine engine 10 drives a generator 24 that produces electrical power.
Various embodiments are described which measure, analyze and/or control a set of GTs, which may include one or more gas turbine engines (GTs), e.g., in a fleet. It is understood that these approaches are similarly applied to a single GT as two or more GTs. It is further understood that the term “set” as used herein can mean 1 or more.
In various embodiments, a plurality of control sensors 26 detect various operating conditions of gas turbine engine 10, generator 24, and/or the ambient environment during operation of gas turbine engine 10. In many instances, multiple redundant control sensors 26 may measure the same operating condition. For example, groups of redundant temperature control sensors 26 may monitor ambient temperature, compressor discharge temperature, turbine exhaust gas temperature, and/or other operating temperatures the gas stream (not shown) through gas turbine engine 10. Similarly, groups of other redundant pressure control sensors 26 may monitor ambient pressure, static and dynamic pressure levels at compressor 12, turbine 16 exhaust, and/or other parameters in gas turbine engine 10. Control sensors 26 may include, without limitation, flow sensors, speed sensors, flame detector sensors, valve position sensors, guide vane angle sensors, and/or any other device that may be used to sense various operating parameters during operation of gas turbine engine 10.
As used herein, the term “parameter” refers to characteristics that can be used to define the operating conditions of gas turbine engine 10, such as temperatures, pressures, and/or gas flows at defined locations within gas turbine engine 10. Some parameters are measured, i.e., are sensed and are directly known, while other parameters are calculated by a model and are thus estimated and indirectly known. Some parameters may be initially input by a user to controller 18. The measured, estimated, or user input parameters represent a given operating state of gas turbine engine 10.
A fuel control system 28 regulates an amount of fuel flow from a fuel supply (not shown) to combustor 14, an amount split between primary and secondary fuel nozzles (not shown), and an amount mixed with secondary air flowing into combustor 14. Fuel control system 28 may also select a type of fuel for use in combustor 14. Fuel control system 28 may be a separate unit or may be a component of controller 18.
Controller (control system) 18 may be a computer system that includes at least one processor (not shown) and at least one memory device (not shown) that executes operations to control the operation of gas turbine engine 10 based at least partially on control sensor 26 inputs and on instructions from human operators. The controller may include, for example, a model of gas turbine engine 10. Operations executed by controller 18 may include sensing or modeling operating parameters, modeling operational boundaries, applying operational boundary models, or applying scheduling algorithms that control operation of gas turbine engine 10, such as by regulating a fuel flow to combustor 14. Controller 18 compares operating parameters of gas turbine engine 10 to operational boundary models, or scheduling algorithms used by gas turbine engine 10 to generate control outputs, such as, without limitation, a firing temperature. Commands generated by controller 18 may cause a fuel actuator 27 on gas turbine engine 10 to selectively regulate fuel flow, fuel splits, and/or a type of fuel channeled between the fuel supply and combustors 14. Other commands may be generated to cause actuators 29 to adjust a relative position of IGVs 21, adjust inlet bleed heat, or activate other control settings on gas turbine engine 10.
Operating parameters generally indicate the operating conditions of gas turbine engine 10, such as temperatures, pressures, and gas flows, at defined locations in gas turbine engine 10 and at given operating states. Some operating parameters are measured, i.e., sensed and are directly known, while other operating parameters are estimated by a model and are indirectly known. Operating parameters that are estimated or modeled, may also be referred to as estimated operating parameters, and may include for example, without limitation, firing temperature and/or exhaust temperature. Operational boundary models may be defined by one or more physical boundaries of gas turbine engine 10, and thus may be representative of optimal conditions of gas turbine engine 10 at each boundary. Further, operational boundary models may be independent of any other boundaries or operating conditions. Scheduling algorithms may be used to determine settings for the turbine control actuators 27, 29 to cause gas turbine engine 10 to operate within predetermined limits. Typically, scheduling algorithms protect against worst-case scenarios and have built-in assumptions based on certain operating states. Boundary control is a process by which a controller, such as controller 18, is able to adjust turbine control actuators 27, 29 to cause gas turbine engine 10 to operate at a preferred state.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of an example control architecture 200 that may be used with controller 18 (shown in FIG. 1) to control operation of gas turbine engine 10 (shown in FIG. 1). More specifically, in various embodiments, control architecture 200 is implemented in controller 18 and includes a model-based control (MBC) module 56. MBC module 56 is a robust, high fidelity, physics-based model of gas turbine engine 10. MBC module 56 receives measured conditions as input operating parameters 48. Such parameters 48 may include, without limitation, ambient pressure and temperature, fuel flows and temperature, inlet bleed heat, and/or generator power losses. MBC module 56 applies input operating parameters 48 to the gas turbine model to determine a nominal firing temperature 50 (or nominal operating state 428). MBC module 56 may be implemented in any platform that enables operation of control architecture 200 and gas turbine engine 10 as described herein.
Further, in various embodiments, control architecture 200 includes an adaptive real-time engine simulation (ARES) module 58 that estimates certain operating parameters of gas turbine engine 10. For example, in one embodiment, ARES module 58 estimates operational parameters that are not directly sensed such as those generated by control sensors 26 for use in control algorithms. ARES module 58 also estimates operational parameters that are measured such that the estimated and measured conditions can be compared. The comparison is used to automatically tune ARES module 58 without disrupting operation of gas turbine engine 10.
ARES module 58 receives input operating parameters 48 such as, without limitation, ambient pressure and temperature, compressor inlet guide vane position, fuel flow, inlet bleed heat flow, generator power losses, inlet and exhaust duct pressure losses, and/or compressor inlet temperature. ARES module 58 then generates estimated operating parameters 60, such as, without limitation, exhaust gas temperature 62, compressor discharge pressure, and/or compressor discharge temperature. In various embodiments, ARES module 58 uses estimated operating parameters 60 in combination with input operating parameters 48 as inputs to the gas turbine model to generate outputs, such as, for example, a calculated firing temperature 64.
In various embodiments, controller 18 receives as an input, a calculated firing temperature 52. Controller 18 uses a comparator 70 to compare calculated firing temperature 52 to nominal firing temperature 50 to generate a correction factor 54. Correction factor 54 is used to adjust nominal firing temperature 50 in MBC module 56 to generate a corrected firing temperature 66. Controller 18 uses a comparator 74 to compare the control outputs from ARES module 58 and the control outputs from MBC module 56 to generate a difference value. This difference value is then input into a Kalman filter gain matrix (not shown) to generate normalized correction factors that are supplied to controller 18 for use in continually tuning the control model of ARES module 58 thus facilitating enhanced control of gas turbine engine 10. In an alternative embodiment, controller 18 receives as an input exhaust temperature correction factor 68. Exhaust temperature correction factor 68 may be used to adjust exhaust temperature 62 in ARES module 58.
FIG. 3 is a graph that shows a probabilistic simulation of the operating states of a statistically significant number of the gas turbine engine 10 of FIG. 1 using the model of gas turbine engine used by controller 18. The graph represents power output versus firing temperature of gas turbine engine 10. Line 300 is the linear regression model for the plurality of data points 308. Lines 302 represent the 99% prediction interval corresponding to data points 308. Further, line 304 represents the nominal or design firing temperature 50 for gas turbine engine 10, and line 306 represents a nominal or design power output for gas turbine engine 10. In various embodiments, the probabilistic simulation shown in FIG. 3 shows an approximate variance in firing temperature of 80 units. This variance may be attributed to the component tolerances of gas turbine engine 10, and the measurement uncertainty of controller 18 and control sensors 26.
Described herein are approaches for tuning gas turbine engine 10 that facilitates reducing variation in the actual gas turbine engine 10 operating state, e.g., firing temperature and/or exhaust temperature, which facilitates reducing variation in power output, emissions, and life of gas turbine engine 10. The probabilistic control approaches described herein may be implemented as either a discrete process to tune gas turbine engine 10 during installation and at various periods, or may be implemented within controller 18 to run periodically at a predetermined interval and/or continuously during operation of gas turbine engine 10. These approaches do not measure gas turbine firing temperature directly because firing temperature is an estimated parameter, as previously discussed. These probabilistic control approaches, however, can yield directly measured parameters that are strong indicators of the firing temperature of the gas turbine engine 10, and allow for improved control over the firing temperature in a gas turbine engine 10.
FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram illustrating a method performed according to various embodiments. As described herein, the method can be performed (e.g., executed) using at least one computing device, implemented as a computer program product (e.g., a non-transitory computer program product), or otherwise include the following processes:
Process P1: commanding each GT 10 in the set of GTs to a base load level (e.g., target indicated firing temperature), based upon a measured ambient condition for each GT 10. As noted herein, the base load (with a target indicated firing temp) is associated with a mega-watt power output value and an emissions value for the measured ambient condition. As further noted herein, in response to commanding each GT 10 in the set of GTs to the base load level, each GT 10 does not attain at least one of the nominal MW output value (P50 MW), the nominal fuel flow value (P50 Fuel Flow) or the nominal emissions value (P50 NOx). According to various embodiments, the process of commanding each GT 10 in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match the nominal MW output value moves an actual fuel flow value (as well as emissions value) for each GT 10 closer to the nominal fuel flow value (and nominal emissions value) without matching the nominal fuel flow value (and nominal emissions value);
Process P2: commanding each GT 10 in the set of GTs to adjust a respective output to match a nominal mega-watt power output value, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT 10. In various embodiments, process P2 can further include converting the difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and the nominal fuel flow value for each GT 10 into a difference between a respective mega-watt power output value and the nominal mega-watt power output value at the ambient condition value for each GT 10;
Process P3: adjusting an operating condition of each GT 10 in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition. According to various embodiments, the process of adjusting the operating condition of each GT 10 includes adjusting the operating condition of each GT 10 in the set of GTs by a fixed fraction of the difference between the respective mega-watt power output value and the nominal mega-watt power output value, such that the output of each GT 10 approaches and then reaches a respective nominal mega-watt power output value. According to various embodiments, adjusting of the operating condition of each GT 10 in the set of GTs by the fixed fraction of the difference between the respective mega-watt power output value and the nominal mega-watt power output value aligns each GT 10 on a line in graphical space plotting mega-watts versus emissions that is orthogonal to a nominal mega-watt power output/fuel flow characteristic for each GT 10;
Process P4: commanding each GT 10 in the set of GTs to a part load level, the part load level representing a fraction of the base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual fuel flow value for each GT 10 at the part load level. This process can include commanding each GT 10 in the set of GTs to a series of distinct part load levels, and for each distinct part load level, measuring an actual fuel flow for each of the GTs 10. For example, this process can include setting each GT 10 to a minimum inlet guide vane (IGV) position, and measuring an actual fuel flow for the GT 10. As is known in the art, IGVs are used to control an amount of air flow that enters the combustion chamber of a GT (e.g., GT 10). The position of the IGVs thus affects the output of GT 10, and is conventionally controlled using a control system and/or its related software. In various embodiments, a plurality of IGV positions are selected, each corresponding with a distinct part-load condition. In some embodiments, a first part load level corresponds with the minimum IGV position (that is, the closest position the IGVs can be to closed, without being closed), and progressively more open IGV positions are used as subsequent part load levels (each progressively increasing the part load). In addition to measuring the actual fuel flow for each GT 10 at each of the part load levels, various embodiments can include measuring NOx and MW output for each of the part load levels;
Process P5: calibrating the set of GTs based upon a difference between the measured actual fuel flow value at the part load level and the measured actual fuel flow value after adjusting the output to match the nominal mega-watt power output value. It is understood that this calibration process can be performed using several (e.g., 3 or more) part load condition data sets. In various embodiments, the measured fuel flow (and in some cases, NOx, MW output, etc.) for each GT 10 at each part load level can be compared with an expected fuel flow, etc. for the model GT (developed in processes P1-P3) at those part load levels. In the case that the measured fuel flow does not match the expected fuel flow (+/− an acceptable deviation), the process can include modifying the combustor tuning parameters, e.g., firing temperature, air/fuel ratio, etc. in order to bring the actual measured fuel flow closer to the expected fuel flow for each GT 10, as calculated in process P3.
FIGS. 5-7 show graphical depictions, via MW-power v. Fuel Flow graphs, of the processes described in FIG. 4, with respect to an example data set representing a set (plurality) of GTs (similar to GT 10). All data points shown in FIGS. 5-6 represent MW-power v. Fuel Flow at indicated firing temperatures, where “indicated” firing temperature is the firing temperature as displayed or otherwise outputted by the controller of GT 10. That is, the “indicated” firing temperature is not necessarily the actual firing temperature (which, as described herein, cannot be accurately measured), but instead, the firing temperature as estimated by the controller (and related equipment) of the GT 10.
As shown in this example, e.g., in FIG. 5, the fleet regression line RL represents a conventional statistical regression of the fleet of GTs 10 in MW/Fuel Flow space. The line ML is parallel with the Fuel Flow axis (at constant MW), and intersects line RL at the mean data point along line RL. Line GL is a function of the mean firing temperature (T4) of the set of GTs. The mean combustion temperature (T3.9) is a function of the mean firing temperature, and is greater than the mean firing temperature. Noted herein, as the mean firing temperature increases, so will the mean combustion temperature, meaning that line GL will shift to a greater MW/Fuel Flow value, while remaining orthogonal to line RL. As described herein, according to various embodiments, a process can include shifting line RL, by a particular fraction to determine the position of GL. In particular, that fraction is measured from the constant MW line ML, where “0” represents no shift, and “1” represents shifting all GTs 10 in the fleet to the P50 Fuel Flow machine. According to various embodiments, the fraction is determined based upon an amount that the GT 10 in the fleet of GTs with the highest fuel flow would shift in order to move below the P50 Fuel Flow value. In one example embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the fraction is approximately 1/1.4 (around 0.71). However, it is understood that according to various embodiments, the fraction can vary between approximately 0.5 and 1, e.g., 0.62, 0.8, etc. This shift, performed according to various embodiments, minimizes fuel flow variation across the fleet of GTs 10. It is understood that the shifting processes described with respect to FIG. 5 may vary depending upon the type of gas turbine in the fleet of GTs 10. That is, different sized gas turbines, with different ratings, ambient conditions, etc. may require a distinct shift from the constant MW line ML to the ultimate position of GL in order to position the GT with the highest fuel flow below the P50 Fuel Flow value.
FIG. 6 shows an additional MW/Fuel Flow graphical depiction, with additional indicates shifted GLs, GL′ and GL′′. GL′ shows a shift fraction of 0.62 (1/1.6) from ML, while GL′′ shows a shift fraction of 0.8 (1/1.25) from ML.
FIG. 7 shows a three-dimensional graphical depiction of the process P3 (FIG. 4), namely, adjusting an operating condition of each GT in the set of GTs based upon a difference between the respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal fuel flow value at the ambient condition. That is, as shown in FIG. 7, the GL plane, defined by the plane of the GL (FIGS. 5-6) across firing temperature (T4) space, illustrates a model of where the set of GTs operate in the firing temperature (T4) space. That is, although actual firing temperature (T4) cannot be directly measured for each GT in the set of GTs, the GL plane represents the most accurate model of the firing temperature of GTs within the set of GTs. According to the various embodiments, process P3 includes adjusting an operating condition of each GT based upon a difference between its respective measured actual fuel flow value and a nominal (average) fuel flow value for the respective GT. That is, according to various embodiments, an operating condition of each GT is adjusted such that its MW/Fuel Flow value intersects GL in two-dimensional space (FIGS. 5-6), and the GL plane in three-dimensional space (FIG. 7). The intersection of the nominal (P50) MW/Fuel Flow lines and the GL plane represents the most accurate model of the desired mean actual firing temperature (P4), and by tuning each GT 10 to approach that GL plane (described with respect to FIG. 6), firing temperature variation is reduced across the fleet, increasing the life of the fleet.
The (green line) GL (and the GL plane) is a characteristic of how gas turbines are designed and built, and in MW/Fuel Flow space, its center is at the intersection of P50 MW and P50 Fuel Flow (and P50 NOx) for the particular type of GT 10 in a fleet. The length of GL in two-dimensional space is defined by the GT-to-GT hardware variation for a given type of GT (e.g., physical variances in the manufacture of two machines to the same specifications). By altering operating conditions of a GT 10 in order to align the MW/Fuel Flow value for that GT 10 with the GL (and GL plane), the variation in the actual firing temperature (T4) is minimized.
According to various embodiments, it is understood that the GLs (and GL plane) shown in FIGS. 5-7 can be used to represent the fleet of GTs at each distinct load condition, e.g., base load, part load condition (i) (e.g., minimum IGV position), part load condition (ii) (e.g., second intermediate part load condition), etc. That is, each set of graphical depictions in FIGS. 5-7 can represent a distinct load condition. In these embodiments, each GT 10 can be represented by a point on a series of distinct GLs (in distinct load conditions), and sets of graphs for distinct load conditions can be overlayed (by combining data) to form a piecewise continuous line connecting the GT 10 at distinct load conditions. The control system can be tuned by modifying operating parameters to move the piecewise continuous line to a fleet P50 line that connects the distinct load conditions (e.g., base load, minimum IGV position, and intermediate IGV position(s)). In the case that a significant non-linearity exists in the line connecting the distinct load conditions for the GT 10, additional data points (load conditions) can be gathered to develop a curve. That curve may then be modified (by modifying operating parameters of the GT 10) in an attempt to match the curve with the fleet P50 line (connecting the corresponding load conditions).
Additionally, it is understood that the measuring fuel flow as described herein can be used as a test to determine whether processes of tuning a gas turbine, described in accordance with the approaches described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,498, are statistically accurate. That is, the MW/NOx space (parameters) determined in accordance with approaches described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/546,498, can be compared with the parameters in MW/Fuel Flow space to verify that the MW/NOx values are accurate.
FIG. 8 shows an illustrative environment 802 demonstrating the controller (control system 18) coupled with the GTs 10 via at least one computing device 814. As described herein, the control system 18 can include any conventional control system components used in controlling a gas turbine engine (GT). For example, the control system 18 can include electrical and/or electro-mechanical components for actuating one or more components in the GT(s) 10. The control system 18 can include conventional computerized sub-components such as a processor, memory, input/output, bus, etc. The control system 18 can be configured (e.g., programmed) to perform functions based upon operating conditions from an external source (e.g., at least one computing device 814), and/or may include pre-programmed (encoded) instructions based upon parameters of the GT(s) 10.
The system 802 can also include at least one computing device 814 connected (e.g., hard-wired and/or wirelessly) with the control system 18 and GT(s) 10. In various embodiments, the computing device 814 is operably connected with the GT(s) 10, e.g., via a plurality of conventional sensors such as flow meters, temperature sensors, etc., as described herein. The computing device 814 can be communicatively connected with the control system 18, e.g., via conventional hard-wired and/or wireless means. The control system 18 is configured to monitor the GT(s) 10 during operation according to various embodiments.
Further, computing device 814 is shown in communication with a user 836. A user 836 may be, for example, a programmer or operator. Interactions between these components and computing device 814 are discussed elsewhere in this application.
As noted herein, one or more of the processes described herein can be performed, e.g., by at least one computing device, such as computing device 814, as described herein. In other cases, one or more of these processes can be performed according to a computer-implemented method. In still other embodiments, one or more of these processes can be performed by executing computer program code (e.g., control system 18) on at least one computing device (e.g., computing device 814), causing the at least one computing device to perform a process, e.g., tuning at least one GT 10 according to approaches described herein.
In further detail, computing device 814 is shown including a processing component 122 (e.g., one or more processors), a storage component 124 (e.g., a storage hierarchy), an input/output (I/O) component 126 (e.g., one or more I/O interfaces and/or devices), and a communications pathway 128. In one embodiment, processing component 122 executes program code, such as control system 18, which is at least partially embodied in storage component 124. While executing program code, processing component 122 can process data, which can result in reading and/or writing the data to/from storage component 124 and/or I/O component 126 for further processing. Pathway 128 provides a communications link between each of the components in computing device 814. I/O component 126 can comprise one or more human I/O devices or storage devices, which enable user 836 to interact with computing device 814 and/or one or more communications devices to enable user 136 and/or control system 18 to communicate with computing device 814 using any type of communications link. To this extent, CC plant load monitoring system 16 can manage a set of interfaces (e.g., graphical user interface(s), application program interface, and/or the like) that enable human and/or system interaction with control system 18.
In any event, computing device 814 can comprise one or more general purpose computing articles of manufacture (e.g., computing devices) capable of executing program code installed thereon. As used herein, it is understood that “program code” means any collection of instructions, in any language, code or notation, that cause a computing device having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after any combination of the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; (b) reproduction in a different material form; and/or (c) decompression. To this extent, CC plant load monitoring system 16 can be embodied as any combination of system software and/or application software. In any event, the technical effect of computing device 814 is to tune at least one GT 10 according to various embodiments herein.
Further, control system can be implemented using a set of modules 132. In this case, a module 132 can enable computing device 814 to perform a set of tasks used by control system 18, and can be separately developed and/or implemented apart from other portions of control system 18. Control system 18 may include modules 132 which comprise a specific use machine/hardware and/or software. Regardless, it is understood that two or more modules, and/or systems may share some/all of their respective hardware and/or software. Further, it is understood that some of the functionality discussed herein may not be implemented or additional functionality may be included as part of computing device 814.
When computing device 814 comprises multiple computing devices, each computing device may have only a portion of control system 18 embodied thereon (e.g., one or more modules 132). However, it is understood that computing device 814 and control system 18 are only representative of various possible equivalent computer systems that may perform a process described herein. To this extent, in other embodiments, the functionality provided by computing device 814 and control system 18 can be at least partially implemented by one or more computing devices that include any combination of general and/or specific purpose hardware with or without program code. In each embodiment, the hardware and program code, if included, can be created using standard engineering and programming techniques, respectively.
Regardless, when computing device 814 includes multiple computing devices, the computing devices can communicate over any type of communications link. Further, while performing a process described herein, computing device 814 can communicate with one or more other computer systems using any type of communications link. In either case, the communications link can comprise any combination of various types of wired and/or wireless links; comprise any combination of one or more types of networks; and/or utilize any combination of various types of transmission techniques and protocols.
As discussed herein, control system 18 enables computing device 814 to control and/or tune at least one GT 10. Control system 18 may include logic for performing one or more actions described herein. In one embodiment, control system 18 may include logic to perform the above-stated functions. Structurally, the logic may take any of a variety of forms such as a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a microprocessor, a digital signal processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or any other specific use machine structure capable of carrying out the functions described herein. Logic may take any of a variety of forms, such as software and/or hardware. However, for illustrative purposes, control system 18 and logic included therein will be described herein as a specific use machine. As will be understood from the description, while logic is illustrated as including each of the above-stated functions, not all of the functions are necessary according to the teachings of the invention as recited in the appended claims.
In various embodiments, control system 18 may be configured to monitor operating parameters of one or more GT(s) 10 as described herein. Additionally, control system 18 is configured to command the one or more GT(s) 10 to modify those operating parameters in order to achieve the control and/or tuning functions described herein.
It is understood that in the flow diagram shown and described herein, other processes may be performed while not being shown, and the order of processes can be rearranged according to various embodiments. Additionally, intermediate processes may be performed between one or more described processes. The flow of processes shown and described herein is not to be construed as limiting of the various embodiments.
In any case, the technical effect of the various embodiments of the invention, including, e.g., the control system 18, is to control and/or tune one or more GT(s) 10 as described herein.
In various embodiments, components described as being “coupled” to one another can be joined along one or more interfaces. In some embodiments, these interfaces can include junctions between distinct components, and in other cases, these interfaces can include a solidly and/or integrally formed interconnection. That is, in some cases, components that are “coupled” to one another can be simultaneously formed to define a single continuous member. However, in other embodiments, these coupled components can be formed as separate members and be subsequently joined through known processes (e.g., fastening, ultrasonic welding, bonding).
When an element or layer is referred to as being “on”, “engaged to”, “connected to” or “coupled to” another element or layer, it may be directly on, engaged, connected or coupled to the other element or layer, or intervening elements or layers may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on,” “directly engaged to”, “directly connected to” or “directly coupled to” another element or layer, there may be no intervening elements or layers present. Other words used to describe the relationship between elements should be interpreted in a like fashion (e.g., “between” versus “directly between,” “adjacent” versus “directly adjacent,” etc.). As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.

## Claims

1. A computing system comprising:
at least one computing device having at least one controller, the at least one computing device configured to tune each gas turbine in a set of a plurality of gas turbines based upon a power output parameter and a fuel flow parameter, wherein the at least one computing device is configured to:
command each gas turbine in the set to a respective base load level based upon a respective measured ambient condition;
command each gas turbine in the set to adjust a respective actual value of the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set to match a nominal value of the power output parameter of the set, and subsequently measure a respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set;
perform an adjustment to a respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set based upon a difference between the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter and a nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition for each gas turbine in the set,
wherein the adjustment to the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set aligns each gas turbine in the set onto a first line in a graphical space plotting the power output parameter versus the fuel flow parameter,
wherein the first line is orthogonal to a characteristic line in the graphical space, wherein the characteristic line is a mean characteristic line of all of the plurality of gas turbines in the set, at the respective base load level of each gas turbine in the set, plotting the power output parameter versus the fuel flow parameter;
command each gas turbine in the set to a respective part load level less than the respective base load level, and subsequently measure an actual respective part load value of the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set at the respective part load level; and
calibrate at least one respective gas turbine of the set based upon a difference between the measured actual respective part load value of the fuel flow parameter of the respective gas turbine and the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter of the respective gas turbine measured subsequent to the command to match the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set.

2. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the respective base load level is associated with a base load value of the power output parameter and a base load value of the fuel flow parameter for the respective measured ambient condition.

3. The computing system of claim 1, wherein in response to the command of each gas turbine in the set to the respective base load level, each gas turbine in the set does not attain at least one of: the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set and the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition.

4. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the at least one computing device is further configured to convert the difference between the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter and the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition for each gas turbine in the set into a difference between a respective value of the power output parameter along the first line and the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set for each gas turbine in the set.

5. The computing system of claim 4, wherein the adjustment to the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set includes adjusting the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set by a fraction of the difference between the respective value of the power output parameter along the first line and the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set, such that the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set approaches and then reaches a respective nominal value of the power output parameter along the first line.

6. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to adjust the respective actual value of the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set to match the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set moves the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set closer to the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition without matching the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition.

7. A computer program product comprising program code embodied in at least one non-transitory computer readable medium, which when executed by at least one computing device having at least one controller, causes the at least one computing device to tune each gas turbine in a set of a plurality of gas turbines based upon a power output parameter and a fuel flow parameter by:
commanding each gas turbine in the set to a respective base load level based upon a respective measured ambient condition;
commanding each gas turbine in the set to adjust a respective actual value of the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set to match a nominal value of the power output parameter of the set, and subsequently measuring a respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set; and
adjusting a respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set based upon a difference between the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter and a nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition for each gas turbine in the set,
wherein the adjusting of the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set aligns each gas turbine in the set onto a first line in a graphical space plotting the power output parameter versus the fuel flow parameter,
wherein the first line is orthogonal to a characteristic line in the graphical space, wherein the characteristic line is a mean characteristic line of all of the plurality of gas turbines in the set, at the respective base load level of each gas turbine in the set, plotting the power output parameter versus the fuel flow parameter;
commanding each gas turbine in the set to a respective part load level less than the respective base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual respective part load value of the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set at the respective part load level; and
calibrating at least one respective gas turbine of the set based upon a difference between the measured actual respective part load value of the fuel flow parameter of the respective gas turbine and the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter of the respective gas turbine measured subsequent to the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to match the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set.

8. The computer program product of claim 7, wherein the respective base load level is associated with a base load value of the power output parameter and a base load value of the fuel flow parameter for the respective measured ambient condition.

9. The computer program product of claim 7, wherein in response to the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to the respective base load level, each gas turbine in the set does not attain at least one of: the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set and the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition.

10. The computer program product of claim 7, which when executed, causes the at least one computing device to convert the difference between the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter and the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition for each gas turbine in the set into a difference between a respective value of the power output parameter along the first line and the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set for each gas turbine in the set.

11. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein the adjusting of the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set includes adjusting the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set by a fraction of the difference between the respective value of the power output parameter along the first line and the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set, such that the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set approaches and then reaches a respective nominal value of the power output parameter along the first line.

12. The computer program product of claim 7, wherein the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to adjust the respective actual value of the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set to match the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set moves the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set closer to the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition without matching the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition.

13. A computer-implemented method of tuning each gas turbine in a set of a plurality of gas turbines based upon a power output parameter and a fuel flow parameter, performed using at least one computing device having at least one controller, the computer-implemented method comprising:
commanding each gas turbine in the set to a respective base load level based upon a respective measured ambient condition;
commanding each gas turbine in the set to adjust a respective actual value of the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set to match a nominal value of the power output parameter of the set, and subsequently measuring a respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set; and
adjusting a respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set based upon a difference between the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter and a nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition for each gas turbine in the set,
wherein the adjusting of the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set aligns each gas turbine in the set onto a first line in a graphical space plotting the power output parameter versus the fuel flow parameter,
wherein the first line is orthogonal to a characteristic line in the graphical space, wherein the characteristic line is a mean characteristic line of all of the plurality of gas turbines in the set, at the respective base load level of each gas turbine in the set, plotting the power output parameter versus the fuel flow parameter;
commanding each gas turbine in the set to a respective part load level less than the respective base load level, and subsequently measuring an actual respective part load value of the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set at the respective part load level; and
calibrating at least one respective gas turbine of the set based upon a difference between the measured actual respective part load value of the fuel flow parameter of the respective gas turbine and the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter of the respective gas turbine measured subsequent to the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to match the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the respective base load level is associated with a base load value of the power output parameter and a base load value of the fuel flow parameter for the respective measured ambient condition.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 14, wherein in response to the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to the respective base load level, each gas turbine in the set does not attain at least one of: the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set and the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, further comprising converting the difference between the respective actual value of the fuel flow parameter and the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition for each gas turbine in the set into a difference between a respective value of the power output parameter along the first line and the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set for each gas turbine in the set.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16, wherein the adjusting of the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set includes adjusting the respective operating parameter of each gas turbine in the set by a fraction of the difference between the respective value of the power output parameter along the first line and the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set, such that the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set approaches and then reaches a respective nominal value of the power output parameter along the first line.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the commanding of each gas turbine in the set to adjust the respective actual value of the power output parameter of each gas turbine in the set to match the nominal value of the power output parameter of the set moves the fuel flow parameter for each gas turbine in the set closer to the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition without matching the nominal value of the fuel flow parameter at the respective measured ambient condition.