alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 WWII airpower legend receives honorary promotion to colonelPublished Nov. 10, 2023
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Force Academy Strategic Communications
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS)  --**
                At 100 years old, World War II and Korean War airpower legend, retired Lt. Col. James H. Harvey III., one of the nation’s first African American fighter pilots with the famed Tuskegee Airmen, received an honorary promotion to the rank of colonel Nov. 4. The honorary promotion took place on Denver’s Empower Field during halftime of the game between the U.S. Air Force Academy Falcons and the U.S. Military Academy Black Knights.U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. James H. Harvey IIILt. Col. James H. Harvey III., a Tuskegee Airman and one of the nation’s first African American fighter pilots is honorarily promoted to colonel at Denver’s Empower Field Nov. 4, 2023. (U.S. Air Force photo by Trevor Cokley)
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res

    











Colorado Senator Michael Bennet initiated the promotion this past summer, and Harvey’s daughters, Alysyn Green and Kathy Harvey, and his niece Karen Jackson pinned on the silver eagle rank of colonel.
“Lieutenant Colonel James H. Harvey III led a distinguished career as a 22-year Army veteran and member of the renowned Tuskegee Airmen,” Bennet said. “Having served in a military that was still segregated, he faced no shortage of obstacles, but his incredible courage, skill, and perseverance led him to earn repeated honors, including as the military's first [African American] fighter jet pilot to fly in Korean airspace and the winner of the military’s original ‘Top Gun’ competition.”
In 1949, at the first Top Gunnery Meet at (then) Las Vegas Air Force Base, Nevada, fighter groups nationwide flew in to participate. Then a lieutenant, Harvey and fellow 332nd Fighter Group Tuskegee Airmen were among the competitors. They executed magnificently in all phases of the meet and were the overall winners. For decades, the record was unceremoniously missing, and official Air Force records listed the winner as unknown. In 1993, the Air Force corrected the record when retired Col. Harry Stewart, from the 1949 team, returned to now-Nellis AFB, Nevada, with proof of the 332nd Fighter Group win.
“I’m honored to have supported Lieutenant Colonel Harvey’s honorary promotion and to recognize his contributions to our country’s history and the advancement of civil rights,” Bennet said.
To honor Harvey and all the Tuskegee Airmen, two planes embodying their legacy flew overhead during the Air Force-Army game. The P-47 Thunderbolt, the plane flown by Tuskegee Airmen from the 332nd Fighter Wing to win the first ever William Tell competition in 1949, and the P-51 Mustang, made iconic by the Tuskegee Airmen during World War II, soared overhead in celebration of the Tuskegee Airmen’s legacy.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



WWII 



veteran 



promotion 



Air Force Academy 



fighter pilot 



Empower Field
**DM** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0079 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CODY R. SACKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 45 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including February 6 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2020

12/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0079
News United States Air Force
 Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III releases statement on Pride MonthPublished June 2, 2023
                        
                        
                        DoD News
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                This **Pride Month**, we honor the service, commitment, and sacrifice of the LGBTQ+ service members and personnel who volunteer to defend our country. Their proud service adds to America's strength.
Their contributions to our national security are powerful. Members of this community have deployed to combat zones around the globe, held high-ranking positions in the Pentagon, and fought and died alongside their teammates.
To defend our republic and win its wars, the ranks of the U.S. military must remain open to all qualified patriots who seek to serve. Militaries that do not avail themselves of the best possible talent of their citizenry put themselves at a strategic disadvantage. We would be rendering ourselves less fit to our weighty task if we excluded from our ranks people who meet our standards and who have the skills, the guts, and the devotion to serve in uniform.
I believe that the story of America should be one of widening freedom, not deepening discrimination. In 2021, I was honored to implement President Biden’s directive to ensure that transgender Americans who wish to serve and meet Department standards are able to do so — openly and free from discrimination.
This often-painful history has made something clear: Who you love and how you identify has nothing to do with how bravely you can fight for your country. When we speak up for the rights of all Americans, when we encourage all qualified Americans to stand a post, we strengthen both our democracy and our national security. The U.S. military is the greatest fighting force in history, and we intend to keep it that way.
As **Secretary of Defense**, I remain dedicated to making sure that our LGBTQ+ personnel across the Joint Force can continue to serve the country that we all love with dignity and pride — this month and every other one. We thank you for your service — and we thank your spouses and your families, whose support makes your service possible.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



secretary of defense 



Lloyd J. Austin III 



SecDEF 



Pride Month 



LGBTQ+ 



Joint Force 



diversity
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1077
DAVID FOY, Reverend, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-94-919-5-BR-1) Submitted: June 18, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Foy, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the secretary's decision to designate his former wife as the representative payee for benefits due to his minor son. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foy v. Chater, Commissioner , CA-94-919-5-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 473 

To ensure that Federal Register notices submitted to the Bureau of Land 

Management are reviewed in a timely manner. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To ensure that Federal Register notices submitted to the 

Bureau of Land Management are reviewed in a timely 

manner. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF CERTAIN FEDERAL REGISTER NO4 TICES. 

5 If, by the date that is 45 days after the date on which 

6 a State Bureau of Land Management office has submitted 

7 a Federal Register notice to the Washington, DC, office 

8 of the Bureau of Land Management for Department of 

9 the Interior review, the review has not been completed— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 473 IS

1 (1) the notice shall consider to be approved; 

2 and 

3 (2) the State Bureau of Land Management of4 fice shall immediately forward the notice to the Fed5 eral Register for publication. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*

 After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral

argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the

record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted September 24, 2007*

Decided September 25, 2007

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 07-1049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KRZYSTOF STOJKOWSKI,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division

No. 04-CR-1012-1

James B. Zagel, 

Judge.

O R D E R

Krzystof Stojkowski pleaded guilty to bank fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and

the district court imposed a below-guidelines sentence of 96 months’ imprisonment. 

Stojkowski appeals and contends only that the district court violated the ex post

facto clause by determining his guidelines range using the Sentencing Guidelines

Manual in effect at the time of sentencing, not the manual in effect during the

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 07-1049 Page 2

commission of his offense. Had the parties used the latter manual, he argues, his

total offense level would be reduced by one. Stojkowski acknowledges that this

contention contravenes current precedent, and that he raises the issue strictly to

preserve it for further review. See United States v. Demaree, 459 F.3d 791 (7th Cir.

2006), cert denied, 127 S.Ct 3055 (2007) (holding ex post facto clause inapplicable to

sentencing guidelines). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[No. 45405-6-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Patrick Henry, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-10262-1, Ann Schindler, J., entered June 28, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SHARON DEWS.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32





Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: March 31, 2011,




/s/ Michael A. YedorMichael A. YedorChief Executive Officer/s/ Douglas BeachDouglas BeachChief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GERARDO ADRIAN SANTILLAN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00292-CR

Appeal from

227th Judicial District Court of

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2018-CR-13543B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
News United States Air Force
 SECAF unveils new “eSeries” classification in nod to Department’s digital futurePublished Sept. 14, 2020
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                **Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett** told **Air Force Association** conference attendees that the future of Air and Space technology will include aircraft, weapons and satellites which will be digitally engineered and virtually tested before ever taking physical form.
A true paradigm shift, systems being considered for acquisition will be designed, developed and manufactured on a digital foundation, just like the Boeing eT-7A Red Hawk advanced trainer. The new process is part of the Department’s digital eSeries approach.
The secretary made her remarks during the keynote speech at this year’s **Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference**, which is being held virtually due to the global pandemic.
“To inspire companies to embrace the possibilities presented by digital engineering, today the Department of the Air Force is announcing a new weapons system designator—the ‘e’ series,” Barrett said. “Aircraft, satellites, weapon systems and more that are digitally engineered will receive an ‘e’ prefix.”
The first U.S. Air Force aircraft designed using the digital approach, the eT-7A Red Hawk, embraced model-based engineering and 3D design tools which reduced assembly hours by 80% and cut software development time in half. The aircraft moved from computer screen to first flight in just 36 months.
Other Air and **Space Force** programs have leveraged the power of digital engineering to reduce design and testing time. In the future, more Air and Space Force acquisition programs will be using digital engineering principles to design, code and build systems.
According to Air Force officials, an eSeries digital acquisition program will be a fully-connected, end-to-end virtual environment that will produce an almost perfect replica of what the physical weapon system will be. It will bring unprecedented speed and agility to help compete in the technology battlespace by enabling thousands, even millions, of virtual iterations at machine speeds to design the best possible system — but only build the single, best design.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



eSeries 



classification 



AFA 



Air Force Association 



air 



Space & Cyber Conference 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Barbara Barrett 



SecAF 



virtual 



eT-7A 



Red Hawk 



digital acquisition program 



digital engineering 



Aircraft 



weapons 



satellites
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROGER FINCHER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2180

[ March 11, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562010CF000085A

.

Roger Fincher, Bristol, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Carolyn ARNETT *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 99-1442

8 S.W.3d 34

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered January 20, 2000

*Wright & VanNoy,*by: *Herbert T. Wright, Jr.,*for appellant.

No response.

PER Curiam.

Carolyn Arnett, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

Her attorney, Herbert T. Wright, Jr., admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
[No. 43794-1-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Shane Watson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-1-01263-8, Linda C. Krese, J., entered December 2, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force announces FY23 Rated Officer Retention Demonstration ProgramPublished Aug. 15, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Eligible regular Air Force aviators have from Aug. 15 to Sept. 15 to apply for the fiscal year 2023 Rated Officer Retention Demonstration Program, Air Force officials announced earlier this week.
The **FY23** National Defense Authorization Act directed the **Secretary of the Air Force** to execute a demo program that allows select aviators with Undergraduate Flying Training Active Duty Service Commitments expiring in FY24 or FY25 the opportunity to sign a contract for up to $50,000 a year, depending on length of the contract. This authority expires Dec. 31, 2028.
Starting in FY24, the highest monetary incentive amounts will be offered only to aviators who sign a contract three fiscal years prior to the fiscal year their UFT ADSC expires. The monetary amounts will be tiered thereafter. In FY23, Airmen should sign up early to receive the highest valued contracts.
“Retaining our experienced aviators is key to succeeding in a warfighting environment,” said **Brig. Gen. Kirsten Aguilar**, Air Force Force Management Policy director. “The demo program helps posture the Air Force to reliably retain aviators to meet current and future operational requirements.”
The demo program will be used simultaneously with the **Legacy Aviation Bonus Program** as a strategic option to meet Air Force retention, training and mission-readiness requirements to maintain lethality of the force.
If the initial demo program is found to be successful and scalable, it may potentially continue with higher funding allocation requests in future years to expand offerings to a broader rated field and/or for an extended period.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



aviators 



Rated Officer Retention Demonstration Program 



SecAF 



Aviation Bonus Program 



retention 



training 



readiness 



One Team One Fight 



NDAA 



monetary incentive 



FY23 



warfighters 



warfighting environment
** **

UnitedStates

SecuritiesAnd Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-15676

 

 

DAVIDSONDIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE III, L.P.

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARL ANTHONY SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CR-94-1)

Submitted: July 2, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Anthony Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Anthony Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. In addition to the reasoning of the district court, see

United States v. Smith, No. CR-94-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2003), we

further find that Amendment 640 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(a)(3) is a

substantive amendment and that the Sentencing Commission did not

intend that it be retroactively applied. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
News United States Air Force
 FYSA: SecAF Frank KendallPublished Oct. 11, 2021
                        
                        By Angel Orozco
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                **FYSA: SecAF Frank Kendall.**

For your situational awareness, it’s going to take "One Team, One Fight" for the Air Force to compete, deter, and win today and into the future. In this episode, the 26th Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall outlines some of his priorities that he hopes will ensure an edge over near-peer competition, including: bolstering relations with defense industry partners; taking care of the families of Airmen and Guardians; getting meaningful military capabilities into the hands of Airmen and Guardian operators; closing the gap on disparity in the forces; and of course, protecting the health of the Total Force by making sure everyone is safeguarded from the COVID-19 virus.







If audio does not start, the audio is not supported in your browser. Click here to listen to the podcast on DVIDS

**Related links:
- Around the Air Force: Vaccination Deadlines, Fighter Roadmap, Leadership and Families****- AF announces mandatory COVID vaccine deadlines**podcast 



AFTV 



FYSA 



SecAF 



Air Force 



USAF 



Frank Kendall 



Vaccine deadlines 



COVID-19