alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. J. Res. 44 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Joint Resolution 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese Freedom 

and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER BURMESE 

FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003. 

Congress approves the renewal of import restrictions contained 

in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act 

of 2003. 

SEC. 2. MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES. 

Section 13031(j)(3)(A) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(A)) is amended by 

striking ‘‘October 14, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘October 21, 2014’’. 

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES. 

Subparagraph (B) of section 401(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is amended by striking ‘‘114.50 

percent’’ and inserting ‘‘114.75 percent’’. 

SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

This joint resolution shall be deemed to be a ‘‘renewal resolution’’ for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 
H. J. Res. 44—2 

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 

resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

joint resolution or July 26, 2007, whichever occurs first. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Order entered July 1 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00537

- CV

DALLAS INDEPENDENT S CHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

FAIRY ALLEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 02580



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 28, 2016 agreed second motion to extend time to file

appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED . Appellant’s brief sha ll be filed by July 15,

2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Vendalux Corporation

By:       /s/
   --------------------
   Name: Tom Hofer
   Title:   Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2406

___________ Joyce Lewis, individually and on behalf * of the heirs at law of Elton W. Lewis, * and as personal representative of the * estate of Elton W. Lewis, * * Appeal from the United States Appellant, * District Court for the District

* of Minnesota. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Carl A. Stuehrenberg, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 12, 1999

Filed: May 20, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Joyce Lewis appeals the district court's ruling excluding Lewis's decedent's postaccident

statement to a state highway patrol trooper as inadmissible hearsay in this wrongfuldeath diversity action. Because the parties' submissions show they are thoroughly familiar with the issue before this court and our review involves the application of established principles of law, we conclude that an extensive discussion wouldserve no useful purpose. Having considered the record and the parties'-2-

submissions, we conclude the district court's ruling is correct. We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### PATRICIA F. GHERTLER v. GERALD S. GHERTLER.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibt 11


                      MICRION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings (Loss)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           (UNAUDITED)                       (UNAUDITED)
                                                       For the three months              For the nine months
                                                          ended March 31,                  ended March 31,
                                                      1997             1998             1997            1998
                                                      ----             ----             ----            ----
                                                              (in thousands except per share data)

<S>                                                  <C>             <C>               <C>             <C>   
Net Income (loss) .........................          $  542          ($1,255)          $2,517          $   19

(a) Computation of Basic Earnings (Loss)
     per Share:

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
  Common stock ............................           4,039            4,061            4,035           4,055
                                                     ------          -------           ------          ------


 Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share ..........          $ 0.13          ($ 0.31)          $ 0.62          $ 0.00
                                                     ======          =======           ======          ======


(b) Computation of Diluted
     Earnings (Loss) per Share:

Weighted average common
equivalent shares outstanding:
  Common stock ............................           4,039            4,061            4,035           4,055
  Common stock equivalents:
    Warrants(1) ...........................              65               --               54              62
    Options (2) ...........................             204               --              125             201
                                                     ------          -------           ------          ------
Weighted average common and
common equivalent shares
outstanding ...............................           4,308            4,061            4,214           4,318
                                                     ======          =======           ======          ======


 Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share ........          $ 0.13          ($ 0.31)          $ 0.60          $ 0.00
                                                     ======          =======           ======          ======
</TABLE>


(1)  Warrants issued 5/94 for 100,000 shares, less shares reacquired under the
     treasury stock method.


(2)  Options granted 11/94 through 3/98, less shares reacquired under the
     treasury stock method.



                                       16
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-91680) of Franklin Street Properties Corp. of our reports dated
February 21, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Franklin Street Properties Corp., Franklin Street Properties Corp.
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Franklin Street Properties Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
February 21, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
---------------------



RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC. AWARDED CONTRACT IN PUERTO RICO

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, FEBRUARY 10, 1999 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) announced today that it has been awarded a contract by the
Administration of Juvenile Institutions in Puerto Rico to operate a Discipline,
Challenge and Accountability Camp for male offenders between the ages of 13 and
20 in Yabucoa, Puerto Rico. The contract has a term of five years and is
renewable for an additional five-year term.

The Discipline, Challenge and Accountability Camp program, which is targeted to
open by November 1999, will focus on education and will provide each juvenile
offender with an individualized comprehensive education plan. Additionally, the
camp program will include a residential component and a transitional component
focused on after care services to assist the youth in their successful
integration back into the community. When the camp program becomes fully
operational, it will serve 128 offenders in residential programs and another 128
offenders in after care services.

Luis E. Lamela, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ramsay Youth Services,
Inc. said, "We are very pleased to work with the Administration of Juvenile
Institutions in Puerto Rico on this program focused on teaching education and
life skills to juvenile offenders. We feel that the camp curriculum will promote
self-discipline and personal accountability, provide challenging physical
activities, as well as build self-confidence by stressing education and
vocational training."

Mr. Lamela added, "This contract continues to build our youth services business
which grew in revenues to over $45 million in 1998 from $18.7 million in 1997."

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading provider and manager of education and
treatment services for at-risk and troubled youth. The Company operates and
manages charter/contract schools, residential treatment facilities, group homes
and service contracts in 8 states and Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information.

Contact:   Isa Diaz
           Vice President Corporate Relations
           (305) 569-4626
News United States Air Force
 31st OG Conducts Operation Porcupine 2021Published March 15, 2021
                        
                        
                        31st Fighter Wing
                **CINCU, Romania (AFNS) --**
                The 31st Operations Group conducted exercise Operation Porcupine in Cincu, Romania, March 4.
Operation Porcupine is an annual exercise that tests the capability of the different squadrons inside the 31st OG and their ability to work together.
“Operation Porcupine is a joint exercise taking place in Romania this year, involving U.S. **F-16s (Fighting Falcons)**, **HH-60s (Pave Hawks)**, and **MQ9s (Reapers)** as well as both U.S and Romanian (joint terminal attack controllers),” said U.S. Air Force 1st Lt. Richard Bush, 56th Rescue Squadron pilot.
The exercise simulated a downed F-16 pilot. The 56th and 57th Rescue Squadrons, 510th Fighter Squadron and 606th Air Control Squadron all worked together to recover the pilot in a simulated contested environment.
“The scenario is an isolated F-16 pilot who had to eject from the aircraft,” Bush said. “Our ultimate goal is to rescue that pilot before he is captured by enemy forces.”
The downed pilot worked diligently to incorporate survival, evasion, resistance and escape methods with the help of a SERE specialist, to evade opposing forces, while also making contact with the rescue team.
The 510th FS provided air support during the exercise while the 606th ACS provided command and control from the ground.
The 56th and 57th RQS responded to the down pilot in an HH-60G helicopter within the hour. “Our role in the HH-60’s is to provide a rescue asset to aid in the recovery of any isolated personnel, should that situation occur,” Bush said.
The 56th RQS team landed the Pave Hawk as close to the pilot as possible, while ensuring the pilot was at a safe distance. The 57th RQS pararescuemen then moved in and found the pilot, who had a broken arm and pain in his back. The pararescuemen identified the downed pilot, escorted him to the helicopter and treated his injuries.
“There were definitely some things that arose that we had to work through on the fly, but overall I would call it a success and next year I imagine it will be the same,” Bush said.
Joint exercises like Operation Porcupine ensure the combat readiness of 31st OG in conducting and supporting worldwide air operations.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Operation Porcupine 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe & Air Forces Africa 



USAFE - AFAFRICA 



USAFE 



31st Operations Group 



Romania 



56th Rescue Squadron 



57th Rescue Squadrons 



510th Fighter Squadron 



606th Air Control Squadron 



exfiltration
#### N. T. Erwin v. City of Austin.

(No. 1964, Op. Book No, 2, p. 274.)

Appeal from Travis County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1037. *Practice as to motions, demurrers and dilatory pleas.*Motions, demurrers and dilatory pleas must be disposed of before the trial upon the merits is entered upon by the parties. The rule of practice long recognized and adhered to by the courts is, that, if not presented before going into trial upon the merits, such motions, demurrers and dilatory pleas will be considered as waived.

§ 1038. *Jurisdiction; want of, requires dismissal of suit; when court a quo had none, appellate court can acquire none.*The rule is well recognized and sustained by many adjudicated cases, that, where a court has no-*585jurisdiction of the subject matter of the suit, it is its duty, at any stage of the proceedings, when that fact is called, to its attention, to dismiss the case. It is also a familiar principle, that, if the justice’s court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter, the county court could acquire none by appeal or *certiorari.*

June 15, 1881.

§ 1039. *Jurisdiction of justice’s . court; amount.*Plaintiff’s- judgment upon which the writ of garnishment issued was for $200 and interest. The justice rendered judgment against the garnishee for $248. *Held,*that the justice had jurisdiction of the subject matter, the judgment for $200 and interest, hut had no jurisdiction to render a judgment against the garnishee for an amount exceeding $200. That such judgment was manifestly erroneous, but not void. That upon *certiorari to*the county court, upon a trial *de novo,*if the facts otherwise warranted it, the county court could have rendered judgment against the garnishee for $200, but nothing more.

§ 1040. *Garnishment; affidavit for; when made by attorney.*Ain affidavit for garnishment may be made by the plaintiff’s attorney [R. S. 5], and in such case he is not required to swear to his client’s belief of facts, but it is sufficient if the affidavit states that he, the attorney, had reason to believe and did believe that the garnishee was indebted, etc.

Reversed and remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1023 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to vendors 

by government entities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. MEEK of Florida (for himself and Mr. HERGER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments 

made to vendors by government entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING ON 

4 CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO VENDORS BY 

5 GOVERNMENT ENTITIES. 

6 The amendment made by section 511 of the Tax In7 crease Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is here8 by repealed and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall 

9 be applied as if such amendment had never been enacted. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

                     AMENDMENT TO SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT


          This Amendment, effective as of January 24th, 2003, (the "Amendment"),
is an amendment to the Amended and Restated Software License Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated as of May 15, 2002 by and between ITA Software, Inc. ("ITA")
and Orbitz, LLC ("Orbitz"). All terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to them in this Agreement.

          WHEREAS, Orbitz and ITA desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and
conditions set forth herein;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

          1.   The parties agree that, effective as of the date of the
Agreement, notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, the following
will be included in the definition of "Incremental PNRs", for the purposes of
Sections 8(c) and 8(d) of the Agreement: (i) any PNR created by an End User
means of "Orbitz for Business" or a similar or a successor Site, and (ii) any
other "corporate PNR", defined as any PNR created by an End User who was shown
any fare(s) in connection with such PNR, including but not limited to so-called
"corporate fares", "negotiated fares" or "private fares" that are offered by a
carrier or by Orbitz to corporate accounts, including the corporate account with
which such End User is affilated.

          2.   The parties have a dispute as to whether, as defined in the
Agreement, the term "PNR" refers to all PNRs created, whether or not
subsequently cancelled, or to PNRs created which are not subsequently cancelled;
I.E., whether such terms refer to "gross PNRs" or to "net PNRs". The parties
agree that, immediately upon execution hereof, they will exercise in good faith
efforts to resolve such dispute.

          3.   This amendment shall amend, modify, and supersede, to the extent
of any inconsistencies, the provisions of the Agreement. Except as expressly
affected by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


ORBITZ, LLC                                  ITA SOFTWARE, INC.

BY: /s/ Gary Doernhoefer                     BY: /s/ B. David Sandberg
  ---------------------------------              -------------------------------
NAME: Gary Doernhoeher                       NAME: B. David Sandberg
     ------------------------------                -----------------------------
TITLE: VP & General Counsel                  TITLE: VP - General Counsel
      -----------------------------                 ----------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145150

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145150

COA: 303359

Alpena CC: 10-003708-FH;

10-003709-FH; 10-003710-FH;

10-003711-FH

BRIGITTE FAYE REYNOLDS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1045]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  HONORING THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY

                                 ______

                          HON. ELIOT L. ENGEL

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 16, 1995
  Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, the New York Public Library, one of the 
Nation's most treasured cultural institutions, and the only library in 
the world combining a preeminent research collection and a 
comprehensive system of neighborhood branch libraries, is celebrating 
its 100th birthday.
  For 100 years, the New York Public Library has been a cornerstone of 
equal opportunity by providing free and open access to information 
without distinction based upon income, religion, nationality, or other 
human condition. The only criterion for admission is curiosity.
  Through the 82 branch libraries and 4 research centers, the Library 
serves more than 10 million people each year. The research libraries, 
which include the Center for the Humanities, the Schomberg Center for 
Research in Black Culture, the Library for the Performing Arts, and the 
soon-to-be-opened Science, Industry, and Business Library, contain vast 
treasures which provide researchers, scholars, and students access to 
the accumulated wisdom of the world.
  However, it is the neighborhood branches that are the cornerstone of 
many New York City neighborhoods. They provide a safe and inviting 
gathering place for the young, the elderly, and, in fact, for everyone 
to learn and enrich their lives. The branch libraries reach far beyond 
the traditional lending role usually associated with neighborhood 
libraries. The many branch libraries that are located in my 
congressional district play an extremely important role in the 
education and socialization of the residents of Bronx County.
  I join with my constituents in recognizing the New York Public 
Library on the 100th anniversary of its founding.

                          ____________________
```