alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 81 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to control 

spending. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2008 

Mr. CAMPBELL of California (for himself, Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. 

GARRETT of New Jersey, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

Mr. SALI, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. BROUN

of Georgia, Mr. PENCE, Mr. GINGREY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. JORDAN

of Ohio, Mr. HERGER, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, 

Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. BARRETT of South 

Carolina, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. GOODE, Mr. 

BARTLETT of Maryland, Ms. FOXX, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mr. FORBES, and Mrs. MYRICK) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to control spending. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


jbell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 81 IH 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

3 for ratification: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

6 not exceed an amount that would cause total outlays to 

7 have increased by a rate that exceeds growth in the United 

8 States economy over the period since 2007, unless two9 thirds of the whole number of each House of Congress 

10 shall provide by law for a specific increase of outlays above 

11 this amount by a roll call vote. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

13 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

14 United States Government for that fiscal year, and for all 

15 other fiscal years covered by the President’s budget, in 

16 which total outlays do not exceed the outlays from the pre17 vious year after taking into account an increase to reflect 

18 the average growth in the United States economy over the 

19 period since 2007. 

20 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions 

21 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

22 of war is in effect. 

23 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress shall enforce and imple24 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely 

25 on estimates. 


jbell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•HJ 81 IH 

1 ‘‘SECTION 5. Total outlays shall include all outlays 

2 of the United States Government, except for those for re3 payment of debt principal. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall take effect beginning 

5 the second fiscal year after its ratification.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7244]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. McCAIN:
       S. 841. A bill to increase the special assessment for 
     felonies and improve the enforcement of sentences imposing 
     criminal fines, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     the Judiciary.
           By Mr. ASHCROFT (for himself, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Craig, 
             Mr. DeWine, Mr. Smith, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. 
             Kempthorne):
       S. 842. A bill to replace the aid to families with 
     dependent children with a block grant to the States, and for 
     other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
       S. 843. A bill to amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to 
     convert the food stamp program into a block grant program, 
     and for other purposes; to the Committee on Agriculture, 
     Nutrition, and Forestry.
       S. 844. A bill to replace the medicaid program with a block 
     grant to the States, and for other purposes; to the Committee 
     on Finance.
       S. 845. A bill to replace the supplemental security income 
     program for the disabled and blind with a block grant to the 
     States, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
       S. 846. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to allow for charitable contributions to certain private 
     charities providing assistance to the poor thereby improving 
     Federal welfare efforts through increased activity, and for 
     other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
           By Mr. GREGG (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Coats, Mr. 
             Bradley, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. Lautenberg):
       S. 847. A bill to terminate the agricultural price support 
     and production adjustment programs for sugar, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
     Forestry.
     

                          ____________________
```
EX-35.1
(logo) Bank of America.


ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION


Re:  Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
     Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C3


In connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a
review of the Servicing activities, for the period ending December 31, 2012 and
of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October
1, 2011 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, National Association has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects
throughout the aforementioned period.


Bank of America, National Association

/s/Dean B. Roberson
Dean B. Roberson
Director
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### enWatSehoo1

e askmd 

### a6 ror e* or 

### noticor on that only 

### mob la, the partIn@OS rrotioe dtrtriot,mu all 

### the law e Baoretarg or the Board 

### Ropre8ontatl70

IlWiakann

&ate& wasl a aote4

by the moent

Legi~- qulrlng mtiee by publioatlon a8 ing 

### 0r not100 

### r0r the irmanoe at fnhoor dlstri6t bonds. Xi WV& a JAW 

### wa8 paased aamehas not 

### aa ye@ becm readrob 

### here. l Will you thereore 

### plearaa&risewhether Or not notiee by piublloation 1s regitriwd ror the 

### mtloe or 

### IIQ

ePe&lon to Be hdb for the i88wmee or boadm br an la&ape&eat rohaol bfrtriottw

### Honomble We 

### ir. &fuller, pa@ #2

The question submitted by you ia oontrolled by Article 2789, Vernon~s Annotated 

### CivilStatutes, 

### which reds, in part,a8 r0lim8:

* * * * On presentation 0r oald petition, aald orriaar or orrfoon rhall order an eleotlon for 

### auoh purpo8e, and order the l herlrr to poet aotioea 

### thereor in tbroe (S) plaoe8 

### in the dietriotfor tea (10) days prior thereto, or if r0r an inds~naent dmriot, the seoretary of skid board or trustees #hall poat auoh notloea. * * ** Thererore, you are re8peotfully 

### adrlsedthat the oalg notice required is that rtated In the above quoted artlola, whioh requires said notloe of the lssuanoe oi bonda by any independent rahool district to be posted 

### la threa pub110 plaoee 

### ten (10) &aye 

### prior to the elcotion.

In 

### uonneotlon

with 

### this request 

### wa have oatefully studicb 

### Hour8 Bill 195, Fwty-seventh Legislaturs, aul we 

### are of the opinion that this bill does not apply to lnboper&e& school Ulstrist 

### bon4 eleotione.

very truly purs
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6827]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AUTHORITY FOR COMMITTEES TO MEET

                      committee on armed services
  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Committee on Armed Services be authorized to meet on Wednesday, May 17, 
1995 at 9:30 a.m. in open session to receive testimony on the National 
Security Implications of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty--START II.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          committee on finance

  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Committee on Finance be permitted to meet Wednesday, May 17, 1995, 
beginning at 9:30 a.m. in room SD-215, to conduct a hearing on Medicare 
solvency.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                   Committee On Governmental Affairs
                     committee on foreign relations

  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the session 
of the Senate on Wednesday, May 17, 1995, at 10 a.m.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent on behalf of the 
Governmental Affairs Committee to meet on Wednesday, May 17, at 10 
a.m., for a hearing on Executive Reorganization: An Overview of How To 
Do It.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                       committee on intelligence

  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Select 
Committee on Intelligence be authorized to meet during the session of 
the Senate on Wednesday, May 17, 1995, at 2 p.m. to hold a closed 
hearing on intelligence matters.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

               SUBCOMMITTEE ON ACQUISITION AND TECHNOLOGY

  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Subcommittee on Acquisition and Technology of the Committee on Armed 
Services be authorized to meet at 2 p.m. on Wednesday, May 17, 1995, in 
open session, to receive testimony on dual use technology programs in 
review of S. 727, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1996, and the Future Years Defense Program.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  

                          ____________________
```
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3363

___________

Michaelene Wallace, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Alliance National Bank, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 20, 2006

Filed: December 28, 2006

___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michaelene Wallace appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment on her claims against her former employer alleging unlawful discrimination

based on her age and the race of her son, in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act and Title VII. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jacob-Mua

v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review), we find

no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Holdings-2014.09.30-EX10.3


Exhibit 10.3


PLEDGE AMENDMENT
This PLEDGE AMENDMENT, dated as of September 30, 2014, is delivered pursuant to Section 8.6 of the Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2010, by ClubCorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), the undersigned Grantor and the other Affiliates of the Borrower from time to time party thereto as Grantors in favor of Citicorp North America, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent for the Secured Parties referred to therein (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty and Security Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein without definition are used as defined in the Guaranty and Security Agreement.
The undersigned hereby agrees that this Pledge Amendment may be attached to the Guaranty and Security Agreement and that the Pledged Collateral listed on Schedule 1 to this Pledge Amendment shall be and become part of the Collateral referred to in the Guaranty and Security Agreement and shall secure all Obligations of the undersigned.
The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that each of the representations and warranties contained in Article IV of the Guaranty and Security Agreement is true and correct as of the date hereof as if made on and as of such date.



Exhibit 10.3






	
				
	 
	CLUBCORP USA, INC.



	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Curtis D. McClellan

	 
	Name:
	Curtis D. McClellan

	 
	Title:
	Treasurer











Exhibit 10.3




ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED
as of the date first above written:


	
			
	CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,



	as Administrative Agent,

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Michael Torrora

	Name:
	Michael Torrora

	Title:
	Vice President
#### Leon & H. Blum v. L. M. Ferguson.

(No. 1371, Op. Book No. 3, p. 461.)

Appeal from Morris County.

November 4, 1882.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 581. *Judgment must conform to pleadings; on plea of*payment, *judgment over is erroneous.*Appellants sued appellee upon an account for $215. Appellee pleaded a payment of $200, but did not claim in his pleading that appellants owed him anything, nor pray for any judgment against appellants. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellee against appellants for $5.28 and costs. *Held*error. The plea of appellee was a plea of payment, not a plea of counterclaim. As a plea of payment, it was properly pleaded, and was legally sufficient, and although sworn to, the law did not require that it should be. [R. S. 1266.] If the $200 had been pleaded a,s a counterclaim, and the defendant had established a demand against the plaintiff exceeding that established against him by the plaintiff, it would have been proper and legal for the court to have rendered judgment for the defendant for such excess. [R. S. 641.] But we know of no rule of law which authorizes a judgment in favor of a defendant for the excess over the plaintiff’s demand of a payment pleaded by the defendant, when no such relief is claimed or prayed for in his pleadings. The judgment rendered in a suit must be authorized by, and conform to, the pleadings of the parties, and it cannot go:beyond the prayer for relief and the relief sought.. [Pinchain v. Collard, 13 Tex. 335; Moore v. Guest, 8 Tex. 119; Menard v. Sydnor, 29 Tex. 257.]

Reversed and remanded.
#### T. & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. J. M. Reid and Wife.

(No. 2437, R. Book No. 4, p. 262.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 296. *Joinder of parties; how affected by amendment setting up a new and different cause of action.*The suit as it was originally brought was for damages to land, which land was alleged to be the separate property of the wife, Dixie Beid. We think the wife was not improperly joined in the original suit as plaintiff. [Sayles & Bassett, *121Pl. & Pr. sec. 269.] But the amended petition abandoned the original cause of action, and claimed damages for injuries done to crops, and injuries done to the feelings of J. M. Reid, the husband, and also for exemplary damages. This amendment changed entirely the character of the suit, and presented a state of facts which rendered the further joinder of Dixie Reid as a plaintiff improper and fatal to the suit. The right of action, as set forth in the amendment, was alone in J. M. Reid, and he alone could be permitted to prosecute it. [Sayles & Bassett, Pl. & Pr. sec. 278.] It was error to entertain the suit in. this shape.

November 11, 1882.

§ 297. *Charge of the court; not warranted by evidence or pleading.*A charge of the court which instructed the jury that they might find damages for the use of the occupation of the land from the time defendants entered thereon until the right of way was legally acquired, when there was not a particle of evidence to prove the value of such use and occupation, was erroneous; and it was error to instruct the jury that plaintiffs might recover damages to crops on the land from overflow, when there was no allegation in the pleadings to authorize it.

§ 298. *Measure of damages for injuries to or destruction of crop.*Where a crop is injured or destroyed, the measure of damages is the actual value of the crop which was injured or destroyed at the time of such injury or destruction, with legal interest upon the amount from that date. [2 Thompson on Neg. 1262, and cases there cited.]

Reversed and remanded.
#### S. A. Owens v. Geo. M. Prather.

(No. 1257, Op. Book No. 2, p. 400.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1131. *Jurisdiction of county court; suit for damages for removing division fence; trespass to land, etc.*It is not always an easy matter to define the exact lines which separate the jurisdiction of the county and district courts in respect to suits in which the title to land may come in controversy. The constitution says the county court shall not have jurisdiction of suits for the recovery of land, but that would not deprive them of the right to try suits for trespasses upon land, or cutting and removing *641timber from it, or for rent or use and occupation of it. In suits of this character it may be very material for the party to prove his title to the land, that he may recover for the trespass or the damages, but he does not sue for or recover the land, nor does any judgment which may be rendered in the county court determine his right to flie land, or in the least affect the title to it. In this suit the claim upon which’ the plaintiff could recover is for trespass upon the land he claims to own while he owned it, and for the removal of the rails from the division fence, if he owned any part of them. In effect it is for this ho sued, and the suit was well brought in the county •court. [Note.— This suit was brought by appellant Owens for damages for taking away rails from a division fence between lands alleged to belong to appellant and appellee. There was a verdict and judgment for appellee, which was affirmed upon the facts. See the case of Scripture v. Kent, *ante,*p. 592, which seems to conflict with the foregoing decision upon the question of jurisdiction of a suit for damages for removing a division fence.]

June 8, 1881.

Affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Budget Testimony, Bereavement Leave, One-Stop Promotion WebsitePublished April 7, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, senior leaders tell lawmakers about the negative consequences of a delayed budget process, the Department of Defense has a new bereavement leave policy, and there’s a new promotion studies website that brings several resources together to make promotions testing preparation easier. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



CSAF 



CSO 



SecAF 



budget proposal 



DAF 



bereavement leave 



Mortuary 



enlisted promotion 



AETC 



EPRRC 



TSgt 



SSgt Related Links
        Squadron unveils one-stop website for enlisted promotion study materials
            
            DoD announces new bereavement leave benefit for service members
            
            Kendall, Brown, Saltzman tell lawmakers ‘on-time’ budget needed to meet security challenges, transform Air, Space Forces
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1093]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    TRIBUTE TO MR. JOHN L. CRAWFORD

                                 ______

                          HON. JOSE E. SERRANO

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                          Monday, May 22, 1995
  Mr. SERRANO. Mr. Speaker, on Friday, May 19, 1995, a group of 
dedicated public school educators gathered in my congressional district 
to pay tribute to one of their distinguished colleagues, John L. 
Crawford.
  Mr. Crawford has been the principal of Intermediate School 183 since 
it opened its doors in the South Bronx in 1974 and has earned the 
distinction of being the longest serving intermediate school principal 
in Community School District Seven. He has been a dedicated and 
innovative school leader, bringing many new programs to his school and 
the district at large. Mr. Crawford developed the first magnet school 
program in the district, the Paul Robeson Magnet School for Medical 
Careers and Health Professions, and implemented an comprehensive after-
school program which then served as a model for New York City youth 
board school based programs throughout the city. Because of his 
leadership and in recognition of his contributions, Mr. Crawford was 
asked by the chancellor to serve on two special advisory committees: 
the City-Wide Mainstreaming Committee on Special Education and the 
Committee on Articulation.
  Mr. Crawford's contributions to the community beyond his school are 
equally impressive. He currently serves as the Council of Supervisors 
and Administrators Community School District Seven chairman and in 
1991, he served as the assistant to the superintendent supervising 
district activities and programs. He is the deserving recipient of 
numerous awards and recognitions.
  I am proud to count Mr. Crawford among my friends. On behalf of the 
residents of my district--in particular the many students and school 
professionals whose lives he has so significantly touched--I thank Mr. 
Crawford for his years of service.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in conveying our best 
wishes and deep gratitude to the principal of I.S. 183, Mr. John L. 
Crawford.

                          ____________________
```