alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K 
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,750)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,907
<PP&E>                                          35,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (25,831)
<BONDS>                                      (125,450)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           (4)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,449)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (200,869)
<SALES>                                       (87,600)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (87,600)
<CGS>                                           45,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   632
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (25.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (25.91)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5386]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            OUTSIDE COUNSEL NEEDED IN SPEAKER'S ETHICS CASE

  (Mr. WARD asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WARD. Mr. Speaker, last week on this floor I was told by the 
Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, that as a freshman I should learn 
the rules. This weekend I have been studying and what I have studied 
has discouraged me a lot.
  What I have found is that, according to the Washington Post, all five 
Republican members of the Ethics Committee broke with 15 years of 
bipartisan tradition and voted unanimously to block an independent 
outside counsel to investigate the charges that have been leveled 
against Speaker Gingrich.
  We need to go back to the way the Democrats did it. Under Democratic 
leadership, the Ethics Committee has appointed an outside counsel to 
investigate every major ethics case since 1979. I urge the Ethics 
Committee to do the same in this case. What is to be hidden? What is to 
be gained? If there is nothing there, let an outside counsel clear the 
air.

                          ____________________
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00336-CR

Cody Dean Biddy, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 7376, HONORABLE GUILFORD JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Cody Dean Biddy was placed on deferred adjudication community

supervision after pleading guilty to robbery. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 29.02 (West 1994). The

district court later revoked supervision, adjudged appellant guilty, and imposed sentence of

imprisonment for twenty years and a $5000 fine.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.
2

1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: April 18, 2002

Do Not Publish
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50599 Summary Calendar

_____________________

WALTER MORRIS, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

WALTER MORRIS, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants,

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(A-95-CV-89)

_________________________________________________________________ June 16, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellants challenge, pro se , the district court’s dismissal

of their civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.- 2 -

They contend that they have a right to seek a declaratory judgment;

that the district court erred by dismissi ng their claims against

Governor Bush, by failing to substitute the correct party for a

defendant named in their complaint as “John Doe”, and by dismissing

their claims that they have a liberty interest in the expectancy of

parole release protected by the due process clause; that they were

denied a fair and meaningful parole hearing; and that changes in

Texas parole law and procedures violated the ex post facto clause

of the United States Constitution.

Because only Walter Morris and Dawud Al-Faruq signed the pro

se notice of appeal and appellate brief, they are the only parties

properly before this court. See Carter v. Stalder , 60 F.3d 238,

239 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing Mikeska v. Collins , 928 F.2d 126 (5th

Cir. 1991)). Therefore, the appeals of all other listed appellants

are DISMISSED

.
Morris and Al-Faruq have not identified any reversible error

committed by the district court. S ee Morris v. TDCJ , No. A-95-CA89 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 1995) (unpublished). Accordingly, the

judgment is

AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 B-21 bomber to be unveiled Dec. 2Published Oct. 20, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force confirmed Oct. 20 it plans to reveal the B-21 Raider Dec. 2 during an unveiling ceremony hosted and sponsored by the Northrop Grumman Corporation at its production facilities in Palmdale, California.

The B-21 is a long-range, highly survivable, penetrating strike stealth bomber that will incrementally replace the B-1 and B-2 bombers, becoming the backbone of the U.S. Air Force bomber fleet.
"The unveiling of the B-21 Raider will be a historic moment for our Air Force and the nation," saidAir Force Chief of Staff **Gen. CQ Brown, Jr.**"We last introduced a new bomber over 30 years ago. As we look to the threats posed by our pacing challenge; we must continue to rapidly modernize. The B-21 Raider will provide formidable combat capability across a range of operations in highly contested environments of the future."The Department of the Air Force is investing in theaircraft’s long-range strike capability as part of its seven **Operational Imperatives**as it develops the advanced communications, sensors, and a broad mix of weapons and supporting systems needed to deter our adversaries and prevail in combat.We must invest in long-range strike in a highly contested environment by integrating the B-21 bomber with advanced communications, sensors, and a broad mix of weapons and supporting systems.After unveiling, the B-21 program will continue its rigorous testing campaign with a combined team of professionals from the **Air Force Test Center**,**Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center**, and Northrop Grumman. Their work will verify performance and identify areas for improvement for the weapon system."The B-21 program is a powerful example of America's long experience with fielding advanced military technology through an innovative, adaptable and efficient defense industrial base," said **Andrew Hunter**,assistant secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. "The Air Force made the decision early in the life of the program to make the flight test aircraft production representative, which is paying dividends as we look towards first flight."The B-21 weapon system is manufactured under the Air Force's contract with Northrop Grumman. It is designed with an open systems architecture, enabling rapid insertion of mature technologies, and allowing the aircraft to remain effective as threats evolve over time.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



B-21 Raider 



B-1 



B-2 



bombers 



Northrop Grumman Corporation 



Palmdale 



California 



Bomber Fleet 



CSAF 



Gen. CQ Brown Jr. 



ACOL 



Operational Imperatives 



Air Force Test Center 



Northrop Grumman
News United States Air Force
 Weather Airmen help ensure flight safetyPublished April 14, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Areca T. Wilson
                        
                        
                        31st Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **AVIANO AIR BASE, Italy (AFNS) --**
                For many, knowing weather conditions before leaving home can make a difference between deciding to wear a jacket or shorts. These concerns pale in comparison to Airmen of the 31st Operations Support Squadron’s weather flight, who provide information on atmospheric conditions that may impact the pilots operating in the skies.
Aviano's weather forecasters also deliver staff support to the 31st Fighter Wing and act as a liaison to the 21st Operational Weather Squadron for 24/7 base resource protection, during installation closures.
"Weather impacts everything, and we (can't) control it," said Senior Airman Aaron Antwine, a 31st OSS weather forecaster. "The best we can do is forecast conditions that have the potential to impact operations and provide the information to pilots, planners and leadership to help mitigate Mother Nature's effects."
Weather Airmen help foresee conditions by analyzing high-resolution satellite imagery, using next-generation radar, monitoring upstream observations and gathering information to produce high-quality airspace forecasts. This information is then relayed to pilots for flying missions and is used to issue warnings, watches and advisories for adverse weather conditions affecting Aviano.
Though each period of the year comes with its own challenges, Antwine said the summer months are the busiest.
"Due to Aviano's close proximity to the Alps and the Adriatic Sea, thunderstorms can develop almost every afternoon and last into the evening," he said. "The heavy rain from thunderstorms can prevent pilots from landing on the runway causing them to divert to another airfield. Hail and strong winds can damage aircraft and cause injuries. Our job is to mitigate the effects of these hazards with updates to our pilots and weather warnings for the base."
In addition to unique challenges during each season, Antwine said the main obstacle faced daily is the constantly changing weather.
"Weather is never the same day to day. It is similar, but never the same," he said. "Today is a sunny day and tomorrow too, but temperatures, dew points, cloud cover, wind direction or speed or any other number of variables will change."
To provide the best report, Antwine said he and his fellow Airmen maintain situational awareness, remain vigilant in their watch and continue to train, to accomplish the mission.
"We have to be able to tell a pilot when thunderstorms are going to develop over the airfield and how long they will last," he said. "The mission, operations and even lives are dependent on how accurate our forecasts can be."Italy 



USAFE 



weather 



Aviano AB
#### W. B. Hance et al. v. Emanuel Antone.

(No. 1050, Op. Book No. 2, p. 465.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

March 23, 1881.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 800. *Sale, etc., of vessel, must be registered, etc.; married woman bound for seaman’s tuages when vessel is her separate property.*Mrs. Emma Hance at one time owned the schooner “Emma.” The vessel was registered in her name as the sole owner thereof. Appellee performed services on the vessel as a seaman, and this suit was to recover for his services. Appellants’ defense was that the vessel did not belong to them at the time the services of appellee were rendered; that prior to that time Emma Hance had sold the vessel. Judgment was rendered for appellee for the amount of his claim against appellants, one of whom is Mrs. Emma Hance. *Held,*there can be no question that Galveston was the home port of the vessel. It is provided by law that “ no bill of sale, mortgage, hypothecation or conveyance of any vessel or part of a vessel of the United States shall be valid against any person other than the grantor or mortgagor,, his heirs and devisees, and persons having *actual notice thereof,*unless such bill of sale, etc., is recorded in the office of the collector of customs where such vessel is registered or enrolled.” [E. S. U. S. § 4192; 3 Woods, 582.] There being no testimony tending to show that the appellee had any notice whatever of the alleged sale of the vessel by appellants, and it not appearing that there was constructive notice by registration, as required by law, such sale, if made, did not impair the right of appellee to recover against the separate property of Mrs. Hance.

Affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN LEE WINTER.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# President nominates 28th under secretary of the Air Force

              - Published  Sept. 22, 2023
              - Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **

Ms. Melissa Dalton, Assistant Secretary of Defense Homeland Defense and Global Security, poses for her official portrait in the Army portrait studio at the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., March 15, 2022. (U.S. Army photo by Leonard Fitzgerald)
Photo Details /                Download Hi-ResMelissa Dalton was nominated as under secretary of the Air Force by President Joe Biden Sept. 21.If confirmed, Dalton would be the 28th official to hold the position.“On behalf of the Department of the Air Force, we congratulate the Honorable **Melissa Dalton** on her nomination to serve as the next Under Secretary of the Air Force,” said Secretary of the Air Force **Frank Kendall**. “I look forward to the Senate’s consideration of her nomination and, if confirmed, working with her on behalf of all Airmen and Guardians.”The position of under secretary of the Air Force assists the Secretary of the Air Force to manage the Department of the Air Force, made up of two military services, the Air Force and the Space Force. Duties of the position include assisting with the development and implementation of policy for organizing, training, and equipping Air Forces and Space Forces comprised of 700,000 active duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian Airmen and Guardians and their families serving around the world.“Melissa has a distinguished career of service to the nation and service members and their families, including as principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for Strategy, Plans, and Capabilities and now assistant secretary of defense for Homeland Defense and Hemispheric Affairs,” Kendall said. “Her experience and deep expertise will serve the Air Force and Space Force well. I commend President Biden and Secretary Austin for her nomination.”**Kristyn E. Jones**, assistant secretary of the Air Force for Financial Management and Comptroller, has performed the duties of the vacated role of under secretary of the Air Force since March 6, 2023.“The Honorable Kristyn Jones will continue to perform the duties of the under secretary of the Air Force, pending Melissa’s confirmation,” Kendall said. “Kristyn’s dedicated leadership and many contributions to the Department are deeply appreciated.”

LOEUSAFAFAir ForceUSecAFSenior LeadersMelissa DaltonDODPOTUScommand information

#             Related Links        

-  Official Biography: Melissa G. Dalton
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1081]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        THEODORE J. BIAGINI HONORED BY SISTER-COUNTY COMMISSION

                                 ______

                            HON. ZOE LOFGREN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Ms. LOFGREN. Mr. Speaker, as a former member of the Santa Clara 
County Board of Supervisors, I rise, today, to acknowledge and extend 
my heartfelt congratulations to Mr. Theodore J. Biagini, being honored 
by the county of Santa Clara, CA-Province of Florence, Italy Sister-
County Commission as this year's recipient of the 1995 Medici Medal 
Citizen of the Year Award. Mr. Biagini will be honored at the Medici 
Masked Ball being held Saturday, May 20, 1995.
  The Sister-County Commission is committed to fostering the exchange 
of art, culture, education, and technology in many diverse areas 
between the people and governments of the county of Santa Clara and 
Province of Florence. Presentation of the Medici Medallion is reserved 
for prominent citizens of Santa Clara County, who typify philanthropic, 
intellectual, and cultural awareness as exemplified by the spirit of 
the Renaissance.
  Theodore J. Biagini has a long history of public service dating back 
to 1963 when he was president of the Student Bar Association of Santa 
Clara University School of Law. Since then, Mr. Biagini has served on 
numerous civic and charitable boards including the Italian American 
Heritage Association, the San Jose Sports Arena Task Force, Eastfield 
Childrens' Center, and the Santa Clara University Board of Regents.
  Indeed, Ted Biagini is a modern day example of a Renaissance man, 
turning his gifts and intellect to a wide range of activities, all of 
which have enriched our community and its people.
  Mr. Speaker, I would like to express my own congratulations and 
gratitude to Mr. Biagini on behalf of my constituents in the 16th 
District and the U.S. House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1






CERTIFICATION




I, James Whang, certify that:




1.              I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Fixed Income Trust For Goldman Sachs Subordinated Notes, Series 2011-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.              Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  The Bank Of New York Mellon, as Trustee.




Date: March 14, 2014






/s/ James WhangName:  James WhangTitle:    Treasurer(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)
News United States Air Force
 SNCOs: Contact AFPC to see if Course 14 completion is noted in recordsPublished April 6, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Senior NCOs recently notified by the Air University Barnes Center for Enlisted Education that their Senior NCO Academy Distance Learning Course 14 Version 6 "failed" exam scores have been corrected may want to review their records to ensure updates are complete.
In late 2013, Air Education and Training Command officials replaced Version 5 of the online course with Version 6.  During routine test item analysis in late 2014, AETC identified several test questions that were outside statistical performance parameters.  After reviewing course material and related test items, Barnes Center officials eliminated those test questions and gave students credit for the missed questions.
Completion of professional military education courses can impact many aspects of an Airman's career, such as senior rater endorsements on enlisted performance reports, promotion recommendations and decorations. Airmen notified by AETC that they passed the course can go to the secure virtual military personnel flight, accessible via the Portal or myPers, to confirm their records were updated.
Airmen who believe their EPR, decoration or other personnel records were affected can contact the Air Force Personnel Center for assistance.
In addition, Airmen who believe consideration for promotion may have been affected can request supplemental promotion consideration. The next supplemental promotion board is scheduled to convene in July at the Air Force Personnel Center.
For more information or assistance determining if records, promotions, decorations or evaluations were affected by the Course 14 update, go to myPers at https://mypers.af.mil and select "Contact Us" on the bottom left side of the page. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one at www.retirees.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-120510-068.pdf.Course 14 



AETC 



records 



SNCOs