alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Eielson AFB reactivates 356th Fighter Squadron

              - Published  Oct. 16, 2019
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Aaron Larue Guerrisky                                                    
              - 354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AFNS) --  **
Eielson Air Force Base reactivated the 356th Fighter Squadron Oct. 10, in preparation for the arrival of the F-35 Lightning IIs to interior Alaska.The 356th FS is the first of two combat fighter squadrons coming to the base.“The 356th FS is reactivating to bring F-35s out to the Pacific Theater,” said Lt. Col. James Christensen, 356th FS commander. “Looking back at the squadron history, the 356th Tactical Fighter Squadron was previously stationed in the Pacific for both the Vietnam conflict, and to defend Korea and Japan out of Kunsan Air Base and Misawa Air Base, respectively. We are excited to bring the squadron back to the (Indo-Pacific Command) theater.”The 356th FS’s mindset will be locked in to preparing for the arrival and eventual employment of the F-35 weapons system.“We are strategically placed here in Alaska to prepare and project 5th generation stealth fighter capabilities, working with our program partners and allies in the Pacific and to be ready, if called, to deploy around the world,” Christensen said.The reactivation represents a milestone toward the 354th Fighter Wing’s air assets returning to operational combat status.“The 354th FW has done an amazing job preparing for the arrival of the F-35,” he said. “The transition to a combat force-provider mindset is what we will all get to learn together.”Col. David Skalicky, 354th Operations Group commander and the reactivation ceremony’s presiding officer, is confident in Christensen’s ability to lead the wing’s newest squadron.“Lt. Col. Christensen is absolutely the right leader; in the right place, at the right time to bring the combat Air Force mission back on line at Eielson Air Force Base,” Skalicky said. “Standing up the wing’s combat mission (with) the most advanced fighter aircraft the world has ever seen, preparing the whole 354th ops, maintenance, logistics, mission support and medical enterprise to fight anywhere on the globe and being ready to project that combat power from one of the most strategic locations on the planet is an honor, a burden and a once in a lifetime opportunity all rolled into one.”Since the record of decision in 2016, the installation’s operational and support elements have been preparing for the arrival of the F-35 in the spring of 2020.“Lt. Col. Christensen will need to draw on the expertise and pioneering efforts of Airmen across the 354th FW to do it,” Skalicky said. “And there’s no one I trust more with that responsibility.”

LRUSAFAFAir Force354th Fighter Wing; 356th Fighter Squadron356th FSEielson Air Force BaseEielson AFBPACAFsquadron reactivationF-35Lightning IIAlaskaPacific Air Forces356th Tactical Fighter SquadronKunsan ABMisawa AB

#             Related Links        

-  F-35A Lightning II
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUSSELL DEAN HARRIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 16918

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 04029

- DGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Russell Dean Harris appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing as barred by res judicata his action arising under Title II of the

Americans with Disabilities Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review de novo a dismissa l on the basis of res judicata. Mpoyo v. Litton

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Harris’s requests for oral

arg ument are denied. 

# FILED

APR 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 16918

Electro

- Optical Sys. , 430 F.3d 985, 987 (9th Cir. 2005). We reverse and remand.

The district court erred in dismissing Harris’s action as barred by the

doctrine of res judicata because defendants failed to establish that the state court

action resulted in a final judgment on the merits. See Intri

- Plex Techs., Inc. v.

Crest Grp., Inc. , 499 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007) (federal courts look to state

law to determine the preclusive ef fect of a state court ju dgment); Peterson v.

Newton , 307 P.3d 10 20, 1022 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013) (setting forth elements of res

judicata under Arizona law)

. Specifically, defendants failed to establish that the

state court did not dismiss Harris’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,

which would not constitute an adjudication on the merits under Arizona law. See

Ariz. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is not an adjudication on

the merits)

.

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Harris’s con tentions

concerning leave to amend.

Harris’s pending motions ( Docket Entry Nos. 6 and 14 ) are denied.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4799]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      KEEPING THE MEDICARE PROMISE

  (Mr. FAZIO of California asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. FAZIO of California. Mr. Speaker, after waging a war against our 
Nation's children by slashing school lunch and child nutrition 
programs, the Republicans have turned their sights on America's senior 
citizens.
  Yesterday, they released the details of a Republican budget that 
finances tax breaks for wealthy Americans by gutting Medicare.
  The Republicans intend to write their wealthy friends a check for 
$305 billion. And to finance this giveaway, they plan to force seniors 
to cough up an extra $900 a year.
  By targeting those with the most yet to give, our children, and those 
who have made the greatest sacrifice--our seniors--the Republicans are 
undermining a fundamental, moral obligation.
  This debate is not about deficit reduction. It is about sacrifice. 
The generation of Americans who now receive Medicare benefits 
sacrificed to bring this Nation great prosperity.
  A senior from my district--from Vacaville, CA--wrote to tell me that 
these programs are: ``promises made to people who earned these 
benefits.''
  Promises? Where have I heard that word before? ``Promises made, 
promises kept.''
  Obviously, this is one promise the Republicans do not intend to keep.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2084

KING GRANT-DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CHARLESTON COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY; 

CHARLESTON, COUNTY OF,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-02676-PMD)

Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Drew Hamilton Butler, Charleston, South Carolina, 

Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, 

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order adopting in part the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment in Grant-Davis’ civil action in 

favor of the Board of Trustees of Charleston County Public Library and Charleston County. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Grant-Davis v. Bd. of Trs. of Charleston Cty. Pub. 

Library, No. 2:15-cv-02676-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

   

   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

   

   

   In connection with the annual report of Energizer Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Rosenberg, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

   

   Dated: August 31, 2016

    

   

   /s/ Paul Rosenberg

   Paul Rosenberg,

   Chief Executive Officer
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force announces the 12 Outstanding Airmen for 2022 

              - Published  July 14, 2022
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Kiana Pearson                                                    
              - Air Force's Personnel Center Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS)  --  **

Air Force officials have selected the service’s top enlisted members, naming the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year for 2022.  An Air Force selection board at the **Air Force’s Personnel Center** considered 36 nominees who represented major commands, direct reporting units, field operating agencies and Headquarters Air Force. The board selected the 12 Airmen based on superior leadership, job performance and personal achievements.  The 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year (alphabetically, by command of assignment when selected) are:  **Tech. Sgt. Brandon S. Blake**, Air Force Special Operations Command **Senior Airman Demarion N. Davis**, United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa **Senior Airman Monica A. Figueroa Santos**, Air Force Global Strike Command **Senior Master Sgt. Kade N. Forrester**, Air Force District of Washington **Senior Master Sgt. Megan A. Harper**, Air Combat Command **Tech. Sgt. Brianne E. Kelleher**, Air Force Reserve Command **Tech. Sgt. Alexander W. Messinger**,  Air Education and Training Command **Senior Airman Steven C. Peters**, Air Mobility Command **Senior Airman Kristina L. Schneider**, Air National Guard **Airman 1st Class Caden A. Soper**, Pacific Air Forces **Senior Airman Christopher T. Thao**,  Air Force Materiel Command - Airman supporting Space Force **Tech. Sgt. Jennifer G. Thomas**,  Air Force Materiel Command - Air Force 

The winners are authorized to wear the **Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon** with the bronze service star device on the ribbon. They are also authorized to wear the OAY badge for one year from the date of formal presentation.  The MAJCOM nominee list is available on******myPers** > Recognition >Special Trophies and Awards or select the active-duty enlisted category from the dropdown menu and search “12 OAY.” 

FSUSAFAFAir Force12 OAYOutstanding Airmen of the YearawardsAir Force AwardsAFPCAir Force Personnel CenterOutstanding Airman of the Year RibbonleadersOne Air ForceTomorrow’s Air Force
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2919 

To amend title 17, United States Code, with respect to the definition of 

‘‘widow’’ and ‘‘widower’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, with respect to 

the definition of ‘‘widow’’ and ‘‘widower’’, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Copyright and Mar5 riage Equality Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF WIDOW AND WIDOWER IN TITLE 17, 

7 UNITED STATES CODE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101 of title 17, United 

9 States Code, is amended by striking the definition of 

10 ‘‘ ‘widow’ or ‘widower’ ’’ and inserting the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2919 IS

1 ‘‘An individual is the ‘widow’ or ‘widower’ of an 

2 author if the courts of the State in which the indi3 vidual and the author were married (or, if the indi4 vidual and the author were not married in any State 

5 but were validly married in another jurisdiction, the 

6 courts of any State) would find that the individual 

7 and the author were validly married at the time of 

8 the author’s death, whether or not the spouse has 

9 later remarried.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the death of any 

12 author that occurs on or after the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Military Justice Reform, Pet Expense Reimbursement, Ranger School RecruitsPublished Jan. 12, 2024
                        
                        By Senior Airman Saomy Sabournin
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                This week’s look around the Air Force highlights the Offices of Special Trial Counsel taking over prosecution for sexual assault and other serious crimes, reimbursing pet travel expenses for permanent change of station moves, and the Army Ranger School looking for Airmen and Guardian candidates. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



irc sexual assault 



Sexual Assault Awareness 



PCS 



pets 



travel 



expenses 



Reimbursement 



Army Ranger School 



security forces 



ranger assessment course 



RAC 



AFSFC 



readiness Related Links
        Sexual Assault Now Tried Outside Military Chain of Command
            
            DAF sets documentation requirements for pet travel expense reimbursement
            
            DAF looking for Airmen, Guardians for grueling Army Ranger School
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1104-E1105]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        A TRIBUTE TO JAMES SMITH

                                 ______

                            HON. JERRY LEWIS

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 23, 1995
  Mr. LEWIS of California. Mr. Speaker, I would like to bring to your 
attention the fine work and outstanding public service of Mr. James 
Smith of Ridgecrest, CA. Jim, a dedicated professional and longtime 
community activist, is retiring as the manager of Administration for 
North American Chemical Co. A tribute dinner will be held in his honor 
on June 2 to honor his more than 40 years of support to the chemical 
industry.
  Jim Smith graduated from Loyola University in Los Angeles in 1954 and 
served 2 years in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Following 
graduation, Jim went to work for American Potash and Chemical Corp. 
where he served in supervisory and management positions at plants 
across the country. In 1967, Jim went to work for Kerr McGee Chemical 
Corp. of Trona where for 23 years he fulfilled critical functions 
relating to labor relations, environmental relations, and community 
relations. In 1990, Jim went to work at North American Chemical Co. 
where he has served as manager of Administration and Regulatory Affairs 
and most recently, as special assistant for public affairs.
  To say the least, Jim has played an extraordinary and active role in 
our community. He is a board member of the Fire Mountain Foundation, 
the Ridgecrest Chamber of Commerce, the Chemical Industry Council of 
California, [[Page E1105]] the Desert Empire Fair, and the Maturango 
Museum. In addition, he has also served as an elected trustee of the 
Trona Joint Unified School District, and as a board member for the 
Council on Substance Abuse Awareness and the Searles Valley Community 
Service Council. Jim is also a past member of the San Bernardino County 
Air Pollution Control Advisory Council and a member of the Kern County 
Air Pollution Central District Hearing Board.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask that you join me, our colleagues, Jim's wife, 
Grace, and his family and many friends in recognizing his many fine 
achievements and selfless contributions. Over the years, Jim Smith has 
touched the lives of many people and it is only fitting that the House 
of Representatives recognize him today.

                          ____________________
```
#### Joel Wolf *versus*Abraham R. Luyster.

Oct. Term, 1828.

Where, upon demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration, the demurrer is overruled, and leave given to the defendant to answer over upon payment of costs, it is the duty of his attorney to seek the opposite party without delay, pay the costs, and plead to issue.

Judgment having been rendered in favour of the plaintiff in this cause upon demurrer to his declaration, the defendant was allowed to withdraw the demurrer, and answer over upon payment of costs. The defendant having neglected to do this, the plaintiff proceeded with his cause, and executed a writ of inquiry.

*Mr. J. Anthon,*for the defendant,

on an affidavit of merits, and papers showing, that after the execution of the writ of inquiry, *221and before the expiration of the rule for judgment, the defendant offered to avail himself of the benefit allowed him by the rale on the demurrer, and also that his neglect in not sooner pleading had arisen solely from the .illness of his attorney, now moved to set aide the writ of inquiry and proceedings subsequent thereto, for irregualarity. He contended, that the defendant was entitled to fifteen days after service of the rule for judgment on the demurrer, within which to plead and pay the costs, because no time for this purpose was fixed by the court.

*Mr. Judah,*for the plaintiff,

insisted, that his proceedings were all regular, it being the duty of the defendant, if he wished to a-A'ail himself of the proviso in the rule for judgment on the demurrer, to pay the costs, and plead immediately, *Viz.*within twenty four hours. *[He cited*2 *Cowen,*452-599. *n. b. also Sands v. Mc Lellan,*6 *Cowen,*582. *and*n.] He also contended, that if his proceedings were regular, they could not be set aside, a trial having been lost.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiff’s proceedings were all regular, according to the practice of the Supreme Court. Where a favour is granted to a party upon payment of costs, it is his duty to seek the adverse party *immediately,*or Avithin 24 hours, pay the costs, and then avail himself of the benefit allotved by the rule. In *this*case, however, as it appears that the defendant’s attorney Avas unable to attend to his professional duties, by reason of sickness, and there is an affidavit of merits, the proceedings upon the writ of inquiry, and subsequent thereto, must be set aside. The defendant, however, must pay all the costs up to this time, upon the presentment of the taxed bill; and until that is done, the judgment must stand.

[S. B. H. Judah, *Att'y for the plff.*H. Western, *Att’y for the deft.]*

Note.—The court intimated that the practice in Such cases, hereafter, would be, that if the taxed bill Avere not paid upon presentment, the party in whose favour it had been taxed would be at liberty to proceed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-370 ) WARREN SHANNON KEENE, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 23, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. Arthur N. Eggers, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick White,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 16, 2009





/s/Patrick WhitePatrick
      WhiteChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7891

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL JAY GREEAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big 

Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00015-JPJ-PMS-10)

Submitted: June 1, 2021 Decided: June 7, 2021

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Jay Greear, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Daniel Jay Greear appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district 

court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Greear, No. 2:15-cr-00015-JPJ-PMS-10 (W.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2020). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED