alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ARM ANDO v. M UNOZ, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, V. JAM ES TILTON; JEANNE S. W OODFORD; SUZAN HUB B ARD, W arde n; N. GR

ANNIS; B . HEDRIC K ; W . J. HILL; B EN C U RR

Y; ANTHONY P. KANE, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16203 D.C . No. 5:07-c v-03846-EJD M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Edwa rd J. Da vila , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm i tte d Oc tobe r 8, 2014 ** San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : O’ SC A

NNLAIN, THOM AS, and M c KEOW N, C irc uit Judge s. 

# FIL ED

OCT 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Arm ando M unoza ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s dism issa l of his la wsuit brought pursua nt to 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a

n d the R e ligious La

nd Use and Institutiona

liz e d Pe rsons Ac t (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C . § 2000c c to -c c 5. W e a ffirm the distric t c ourt’ s dism issa l. I The distric t c ourt c o rre c tly de te rm ine d tha

t M unoz ’ s la

w suit is now m

oot. In Se pte m

be r 2009, M unozwa s tra

nsfe rre d a way from the C orre c tiona l Tra ining Fa c ility in Sole da d, C a lifornia

to a nothe r prison. Sinc e tra

nsfe rring, he ha s re c e ive d num e rous re ligious C Ds a nd a dm its tha

t a ll of his re ligious ne e ds a re be ing m e t. The distric t c ourt wa s c orre c t in de te rm ining tha t his c l a im s for injunc tive and de c la

ra tory re lie f a re m oot. Se e Alv are

z v . Hill , 667 F.3d 1061, 1063–64 (9th C ir. 2012). II The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in de ny ing M unozle ave to am e nd his c om

pla int. Thec ourt ha d a lre a dy give n M unoz one opportunity to am e nd his c om

pla int with the

a ssista nc e of c ounse l a

nd furthe r am e ndm e n t would like ly have be e n futile . Se e U.S. Mortg., Inc . v . Sax ton , 494 F.3d 833, 843 n.11 (9th C ir. 2007), a b rogate d on othe r grounds by Proc tor v . Vishay

Inte rte c hnology Inc . , 584 F.3d 1208 (9th C ir. 2009). AFFIRM E D.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 179 (Thursday, September 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56550-56551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of meetings of the 
National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(6), Title 
5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted they the National 
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, including consideration 
of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
    Date: October 24-25, 2010.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin

[[Page 56551]]

Avenue, Chesapeake Room, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Alan P. Koretsky, PhD, Scientific Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Neurological 
Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 35 Convent 
Drive, Room 6A 908, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-2232, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7912160b1c0d0a120018391710171d0a57171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f09b9f829584839b8991b09e999e9483de9e9998de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: September 9, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-23156 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Robert T. McNaughton v. Samuel Martin.

*Taxes*— Law *of 1885*— Sale *of lands assessed prior to passage of act*— Constitutional *law.*

This case is ruled by *Humphrey v. Auditor General,*70 Mich. 293, and *Hall v. Perry,*73 Id. 202, in which it is held that sales-for delinquent taxes assessed under the 1882 tax law could not-be made under the law of 1885, which was prospective only in. its operation.

Case made from Jackson. ( Gfridley, J.)

Submitted on-briefs June 15, 1888.

Decided November 1, 1888.

Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

The facts-are stated in the opinion.

*James W. Blakely,*for appellant.

*Grove H. Wolcott,*for defendant.

Long, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought in the circuit court for the county of Jackson. The cause-*277was heard before the court without a jury, and the court found the following facts:

1. The plaintiff claims possession of the premises ■described in the declaration in this cause under and by virtue of a deed from the Auditor General of this State, -executed by him on the 17th of November, 1886, upon a •sale of the premises for delinquent taxes for the year 1882.

2. The defendant was in actual possession of the premises described in the declaration at the time of the assessment of said taxes for the year 1882, at the time of the ■execution of said deed, and also at the commencement of ■this suit.

3. The premises so deeded were sold under Act No. 153, entitled *“*An act to provide for the assessment of property, and the levy and collection of taxes thereon,” approved June 9, 1885; the same being one of the public .acts of the State of Michigan.

Upon which facts the said court did on the 31st day 'of December, 1887, file the following conclusion of law, .to wit:

> *“*The conclusion of law upon the foregoing finding of facts is that the plaintiff cannot recover, and that ■defendant is entitled to judgment of not guilty of withholding the possession of the premises mentioned in the declaration in this cause, and that he should recover his ■costs, to be taxed.

> “G. T. Gridley, -Circuit Judge.”

Exceptions were filed by the plaintiff to such findings, and judgment was thereafter entered in the cause for the defendant, in accordance with the findings, and plaintiff brings the case into this Court.

The trial court is correct in its conclusions of law. Substantially the same question was raised in *Humphrey v. Auditor*General, 70 Mich. 292 (38 N. W. Rep. 214), and again in *Hall v.*Perry, 72 Id. 202 (40 N. W. Rep. 324), in which it was held that sales for delinquent taxes .assessed under the law of 1882 could not be made under *278the law of 1885, as the law of 1885 was not retroactive.. The present case must be ruled by those cases.

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
#### M. J. Lee et al. v. John Crosby.

(No. 1236, Op. Book No. 3, p. 494.)

Appeal from Bexar County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 140. *Married woman; liability of separate property of.*The separate property of the wife can only be made liable for debts contracted by her for necessaries furnished *57herself and children, or for expenses incurred by her for the benefit of her separate property.. It roust be shown not only that the expenses were incurred by her, but that such expenses were reasonable and proper.

February 9, 1881.

§ 141. *Married woman; plea of non est factum by.*A married woman being sued jointly with her husband for damages for breach of a written contract, which contract purported to have been executed for her by her husband as her agent, pleaded under oath that she had not executed the contract, or authorized any one to execute it for her, and that her husband was not authorized to execute the same in her name. Held, that this plea pre?. sented a good defense to the action against her, and it was error in the trial court to strike it out.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5388]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     ETHICS COMMITTEE STONEWALLING

  (Mr. VOLKMER asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. VOLKMER. Mr. Speaker, here we go again, I am shocked and dismayed 
that by a straight party line vote the House Ethics Committee failed to 
appoint an independent counsel in the case of our Speaker, Newt 
Gingrich. It is obvious to me the majority members of our Ethics 
Committee have made the decision to stonewall this case. Why? Well, Mr. 
Speaker, could it be because the chairwoman of the committee nominated 
Mr. Gingrich to be Speaker and also contributed to his campaign?
  Could it be that two majority members of the committee are involved 
in GOPAC either as a contributor or a recipient? Could it be that one 
majority member is a potential witness in one of the cases against the 
Speaker involving influence peddling?
  I remind my colleagues that Speaker Gingrich himself said an 
independent counsel is required for any investigation into the position 
of the Speaker. I quote ``this investigation has to meet an higher 
standard of public accountability.''. The clouds are darkening over our 
Capitol and can only be lifted with the appointment of an independent 
counsel. The stonewalling must stop now, Mr. Speaker.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM NOVA INTERNATIONAL FILMS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                11,874
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      12,069
<PP&E>                                195
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        12,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 3,800
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            8,197,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          12,069
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (1,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (1,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (1,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .000



</TABLE>
EX-35.3
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES


OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2011-C3

March 1, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),
(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2011 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and
(iii) the Servicer has not received any notice during the Reporting Period
regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant
to the Agreement from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Nature and Status of Failures: None.


PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES

/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President


Member of The PNC Financial Services Group
10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
#### ISABEL R. DIMESTRIA v. PAUL K. BORNSTEIN, M.D.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

March 27, 2014

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman                                          |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman                                              |
|   | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Air Force to establish new squadron at Beale AFBPublished March 19, 2024
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected **Beale Air Force Base**, California, as the home of a new Battle Management Control Squadron.

The new mission will add 140 military authorizations at Beale AFB over the next few years with personnel expected to begin arriving in summer 2025.

This is a vital step in the Department of the Air Force’s battle management modernization as the department desires to perform this function for multiple theaters simultaneously from a location outside the theater(s) of operations.

The BMCS will integrate with the Common Mission Control Center atBeale AFB and perform battle management of manned and unmanned new and legacy aircraft and allow greater collaboration between information systems.

The CMCC’s mission is to present integrated and fused multi-domainintelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance data to decision makers by using artificial intelligence and machine learning to reduce human task load. It manages command and control productivity, shortens the task execution chain and reduces human-intensive communications.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Beale Air Force Base 



California 



Battle Management Control Squadron 



battle management modernization 



ABM 



Common Mission Control Center 



information systems 



intelligence 



surveillance 



reconnaissance 



ISR
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000919604
<NAME> KERATOPLANETES CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,403
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,498)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the nine months ended December
31,  1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  2,363
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              25
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,072
<PP&E>                                 96,086
<DEPRECIATION>                         30,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         72,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   5,913
<BONDS>                                94,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            (29,014)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           72,744
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       10,532
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           5,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      3,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           987
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       987
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              987
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           20.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                           20.68
        

</TABLE>
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 42 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

health care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota (for herself, Mr. ELLISON, and Ms. JACKSONLEE of Texas) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding health care. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Health 

5 Protection Amendment of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. 

7 The following article is proposed as an amendment 

8 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 

9 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu10 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 42 IH 

1 the several States within seven years after the date of its 

2 submission for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Health care, including care to prevent 

5 and treat illness, is the right of all citizens of the United 

6 States and necessary to ensure the strength of the Nation. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en8 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla9 tion.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS