alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         124,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,606,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (325,422)
<INVENTORY>                                    193,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,598,879
<PP&E>                                         961,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,455,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,442,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,539
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,803,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,455,018
<SALES>                                      2,281,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,281,317
<CGS>                                        2,033,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,534,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             152,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (253,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (253,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (335,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1707]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Casper/Natrona County International Airport, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 157, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 157 to include a site in Casper, Wyoming, within the Casper Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 23-2010, filed March 29, 2010);                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (75 FR 17125-17126, 04/05/2010) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, Therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to expand FTZ 157 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and further subject to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit.

      ( print page 56988)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of September 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23300 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto ReceivablesTrust 2011-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.

 

Date: March 28, 2012

 

 

By:  /s/ MIN SOK RANDY PARK           

Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: President and Secretary

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
#### J. W. Smith v. M. G. Thomas.

(No. 301, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 213.)

Appeal from San Jacinto County.

February 9, 1878.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 677. *Fraud and sharp practice in obtaining judgment.*On the 10th of March, 1877, appellee recovered judgment against appellant before a justice of the peace .for $200 and costs, and attempted to assert a lien on certain property before that time levied on by virtue of a distress warrant. The judgment recites that the parties appeared and announced ready for trial, and that the defendant, in open court, confessed that he wa.s indebted to the plaintiff in the sum claimed. Appellant sued out a writ of *certiorari*to remove the cause to the county court, stating, among other things, that he had a good defense to the suit, stating his defense, and saying that he went with his attorney to the. office of the justice of the peace at the time appointed for trial, and while there a compromise was agreed on, and, among other things, the appellee agreed to dismiss the cause without costs to appellant; that he confided in this agreement and the promise of appellee, left the place, and that after he so left, the appellee, disregarding.his agreement, caused the judgment to be so entered by the justice, which, he says, was a fraud upon his rights, and that he did not discover the fraud until it was too late to move for a new trial in the justice’s court and give notice of appeal. In the county court the case was dismissed, on motion of appellee, on various grounds. This was error. The county court should not have dismissed for any of the grounds set out, but should have tried the case.

Reversed and remanded
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1064]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    RESEARCH FOR OUR NATION'S FUTURE

                                 ______

                           HON. STEVEN SCHIFF

                             of new mexico

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 17, 1995
  Mr. SCHIFF. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to mention the importance of 
the basic scientific research funded under budget function 270. While 
this research may fall under the Energy Supply Research and Development 
title, this work, much of which is occurring at our national 
laboratories, is basic fundamental scientific research that applies to 
national problems in nuclear weapons and environmental cleanup.
  Research efforts at the national laboratories are characterized by 
scientific excellence and the integration of basic research to real 
applications in the chemical sciences, materials sciences, and 
geosciences. For example, the materials science research program at the 
national laboratories not only demonstrates the relevance of basic 
science to technology, but also supports the Energy Department's 
primary missions. In addition, these programs take advantage of a wide 
range of large, capital intensive research facilities that are not 
usually found at universities.
  Work in areas such as scientifically tailored materials combine 
expertise in solid state sciences, atomic-level diagnostics, materials 
synthesis and processes science to produce new classes of tailored 
materials for critical defense needs, and which can also be used by 
industry down the road. That national laboratories materials 
researchers win prizes and awards each year, indicates that their 
colleagues in universities and industry recognize the value of their 
scientific contributions.
  In conclusion, I ask my colleagues to be mindful that the national 
laboratories are conducting original and relevant basic research in the 
basic energy sciences program that is of great value to our Nation's 
future.

                          ____________________
```
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 24

- 006 6 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 12249

- A

_____________________________ G AMBA K ENTE R AY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County

. Laura E. Ward , Judge

. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow , for Appellant.

Gamba Kente Ray, Arcadia, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

March 12, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L AMBERT , J AY , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1

Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Bankrate, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth S. Esterow, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, (a) this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

|                |   |                                                      |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                      |
| Date: June 19, 2015 |   | /s/ Kenneth S. Esterow                                    |
|                |   | Kenneth S. Esterow

President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10653

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TORRI DLENA ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CV-453

Before OWEN, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Torri Dlena Anderson, federal prisoner # 45585-177, was convicted of 

conspiracy to produce false identification documents and sentenced to 180 

months of imprisonment. On July 1, 2015, she filed a motion to obtain relief 

pursuant to Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). The district court 

denied the motion noting that Anderson had raised an Alleyne claim in her 

original 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and that she needed to obtain authorization 

from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion. Anderson now moves this 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10653 Document: 00513732552 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2016
No. 15-10653

2

court for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial 

of her postjudgment motion. She has also filed a motion for the appointment 

of counsel.

A COA is required to appeal the denial of an unauthorized successive 

§ 2255 motion. See Cardenas v. Thaler, 651 F.3d 442, 443 (5th Cir. 2011). The 

district court did not determine whether Anderson was entitled to a COA. 

Because the district court has not issued a COA ruling, we assume without 

deciding that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Rule 11(a), Rules 

Governing § 2255 Proceedings; Cardenas, 651 F.3d at 444 & nn.1-2. 

Nevertheless, we decline to remand this case to the district court for a COA 

ruling because a remand would be futile. See United States v. Alvarez, 210 

F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). Anderson’s postjudgment motion was properly 

construed as an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. See Gonzalez v. 

Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 531-32 (2005); United States v. Hernandes, 708 F.3d 680, 

681 (5th Cir. 2013). Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider 

Anderson’s postjudgment motion, we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of 

that motion on the merits. See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774-75 (5th 

Cir. 2000). 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and 

Anderson’s motions for a COA and the appointment of counsel are DENIED 

AS MOOT.

 Case: 15-10653 Document: 00513732552 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2016
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: First
    Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, QBE
    FIRST Insurance Agency, Inc. as Sub-Contractor for SunTrust Mortgage,
    Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. as Servicer, SunTrust Mortgage,
    Inc. as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
    Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   November 15, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Lee & Reynolds v. Henry Flemming.

(No. 1826, Op. Book No. *2,*p. 396.)

Appeal from Wheeler County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1128. *Taxes; collection of, in unorganized counties.*Wheeler county in 1878 was unorganized, and was attached, for judicial, surveying and other purposes, to Clay county, by act of August 21, 1876. [Gen. Laws 1876, p. 242, sec. 4.] While it was thus unorganized and attached to Clay county, the assessor of taxes for Olay county assessed taxes against appellants for 1878, on property of theirs in said Wheeler, county. In 1879 Wheeler county was organized, and a certified copy of the assessment, made as aforesaid, was placed in the hands of appellee, the collector of taxes for Wheeler county, for collection, and this suit was brought to enjoin *639the collection of said taxes, upon the ground that there was no law authorizing the assessment of the same. The court below refused the injunction, and gave judgment against appellants for costs. *Held,*the mode and manner of assessing taxes, and the duties, powers, etc., of assessors of taxes, are fully defined and prescribed by an ■act approved August 21, 1876. [Gen.-Laws 1876, p. 265.] By the terms of that act it is made the duty of the assessor of taxes, between the 1st day of January and the 1st day of June of each year, to take a list of taxable real and personal property in his county, and assess the value thereof, as prescribed in said act. The constitution provides that “all property subject to taxation in, and 'owned by residents of, unorganized counties, shall be assessed and the taxes thereon paid in the counties to which such unorganized counties shall be attached. [Const, art. VIII, sec. 12.] No special or particular legislation was necessary, under the constitutional provision quoted above, to determine who should assess the taxes on property in unorganized counties. For tax purposes, these unorganized counties are made part and parcel of the counties to which they are attached for judicial purposes, and the - provisions of law applicable to the assessment and collection of taxes in organized counties apply to the unorganized counties, in this respect, as part of the organized counties to which they are so attached.

May 18, 1881.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 18, 2004


 /s/ Michael Schuamcher
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer