alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

I, Christopher J. Reinhard,Chief Executive Officer of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 22 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to marriage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2007 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California (for himself, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. 

CANNON, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, 

Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. MCCOTTER, 

Mr. RADANOVICH, and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to marriage. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following article is proposed as an amendment 

4 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 

5 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu6 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of 

7 the several States within seven years after the date of its 

8 submission for ratification: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 22 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Marriage in the United States shall con3 sist only of a legal union of one man and one woman. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. No court of the United States or of any 

5 State shall have jurisdiction to determine whether this 

6 Constitution or the constitution of any State requires that 

7 the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon any 

8 union other than a legal union between one man and one 

9 woman. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. No State shall be required to give effect 

11 to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any 

12 other State concerning a union between persons of the 

13 same sex that is treated as a marriage, or as having the 

14 legal incidents of marriage, under the laws of such other 

15 State.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2915 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn 

T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the 

‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant 

Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON, MAS4 TER SERGEANT JEFFREY J. RIECK AND VET5 ERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

7 Postal Service located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2915 IS

1 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Master Ser2 geant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. 

3 Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

7 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Master Sergeant 

8 Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and 

9 Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27 

Providing for the reappointment of Roger W. Sant as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. BECERRA (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Roger W. Sant as a 

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Roger W. Sant 

8 of the District of Columbia, is filled by reappointment of 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 27 IH 

1 the incumbent for a term of 6 years, effective October 25, 

2 2007. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Diversified Real Estate III, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 14, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 14, 2008     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID FLETCHER.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of King Laboratories, Inc., as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of King Laboratories, 
Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, King Laboratories, Inc., 5009 S. MacDill Ave., Tampa, FL 
33611, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ 
this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f1c1d0f51131e1d170e3f1b170c51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66050416480a07040e1726020e1548010910">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed 
below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited 
laboratories.
    http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of King Laboratories, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on July 1, 2010. The 
next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: September 13, 2010.
 Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-23483 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

										      Exhibit 11

 .                     				      Boston Technology, Inc.
     Statement of Weighted Shares used in Computation of Earnings Per Share
 .                         							 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 .                                  												  Three months ended July 31,     Six months ended July 31, 

 .                               	 														      1997         1996               1997        1996
 .                                															     ------       ------             ------      -----
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>                <C>         <C>
Common stock outstanding, beginning of  period       26,043       24,917             25,501      24,732

Weighted average common stock issued                    900           59              1,444         158

Weighted average common stock equivalents             6,798        8,019              6,749       7,912

Weighted average treasury shares acquired using 
the treasury stock method                            (4,949)      (4,990)            (5,279)     (4,967)
 .                                															     -------      -------            -------     -------
Weighted average shares of common stock 
outstanding                                          28,792       28,005             28,415      27,835
 .                                															     ======       ======             ======      ======
</TABLE>
#### B. P. Curry v. A. J. Terrell.

*(No.*1332, R. Book No. 4, p. 200.)

Appeal from Washington County.

November 4, 1882.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 239. *County court; pleading new matter in, on appeals from justices’ courts.*Where a suit is instituted in justice’s court, and after judgment therein rendered is appealed or taken to the county court by *certiorari,*the parties will not be permitted to plead causes of action or defenses which were not pleaded in the justice’s court. This was the rule aforetime, both by statutory provisions and as held by the courts. [Hart. Dig. art. 714; Pas. Dig. art. 1456; Titus v. Latimer, 5 Tex. 433; Thomas v. The State, 9 Tex. 324.] The rule was held applicable both to appeals and *certioraris.*[O’Brien v. Dunn, 5 Tex. 570; Clark v. Snow, 24 Tex. 242.]

This rule has not been changed by legislative enactments. Statutes hearing upon the subject are arts. 1292, 316 and 317, Rev. Stats.

§ 240. *Appeal and certiorari.*Appeal and *certiorari*are but different modes of removing a case from a justice’s to a county court for a trial *de novo.*The proceedings are analogous, and the provisions of the law governing the one should govern the other where there is no' conflict. With reference to the practice in *certiorari*cases, it is expressly provided that *“*either party may plead any new matter in the county court which was not presented in the court below; but no new cause of action shall be set up by plaintiff, nor shall any set-off or counterclaim be set up by defendant which was not pleaded in the court below,” etc. [Rev. Stats, art. 316.] This rule is applicable also to appeals.

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Rest and recuperation program affected by loss of imminent danger payPublished May 8, 2014
                        
                        By Maj. David Faggard
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs
                **SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. (AFNS) --**
                Defense officials are urging service members to fully understand the Rest and Recuperation Leave Program, also known as R&R, when deploying to the U.S. Central Command area of operations.
Starting June 1, nine countries in the theater of operations including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan will not receive imminent danger pay.
Due to a normal IDP recertification process completed in December 2013, service members who deploy on 365-day deployments or PCS to these nine countries after June 1, will no longer be eligible for the R&R program, according to a May 6 DoD letter, "Recertification of certain USCENTCOM land areas as chargeable R&R leave areas." The letter states those service members whose deployment started prior to June 1, remain eligible for the R&R program
"This recertification has taken place over time as the region has stabilized and countries in the AOR continue to become more and more safe," said Col. Ron Dougherty, the U.S. Air Forces Central Command director of manpower, personnel and services. "Several of these locations allow accompanied tours; it didn't quite make sense to have people PCS their families to a location and still receive imminent danger pay."
There are more than 21,000 Airmen deployed throughout USCENTCOM; however, only a small portion of them, about 500, are affected by this decision.
USCENTCOM officials are working with USAFCENT officials to develop a leave program service members will likely recognize from other parts of the world.
"USCENTCOM, in concert with the service components, is developing options on how to best transition from the current R&R program to an ordinary leave program within these nine countries," said Army Col. John Bray, the USCENTCOM chief of manpower and augmentation.
"We're exploring all options for a leave program in AFCENT," Dougherty said.
For more information, Airmen are encouraged to consult the Air Force Personnel Center website at www.afpc.af.mil, or call AFPC's Total Force Service Center at (800) 525-0102.imminent danger pay 



USCENTCOM 



R&R
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February      23, 2010  | /s/ John G.      Demeritt                                                               John      G. DemerittChief      Financial Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects 9K for E5 promotionPublished Aug. 8, 2023
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials selected 9,000 senior airmen for promotion to staff sergeant out of 51,717 eligible for a selection rate of 17.4 percent in the 23E5 promotion cycle, which includes supplemental promotion opportunities.

Today Senior Raters and their trusted agents were granted access to their select lists through the Virtual Enlisted Promotion Release (EPROM) application so they can notify their Airmen.

The staff sergeant promotion list will be available on the Air Force Personnel Center public website Aug. 10 at 8 a.m. CDT. Airmen will also be able to access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight via the AFPC Secure page.

For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.enlisted promotion 



Enlisted Promotion Release 



enlisted 



enlisted promotions 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force Personnel Center 



staff sergeant 



promotion 



E-5 



career 



Cycle 



23E5
NO. 04-14-00494-CV 

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roland Leal,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v. 

Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually and As Next 

Friend for Avery Rankin, a Minor, As Next Friend for Kara Rankin, a Minor 

and As Next Friend for Samuel Rankin, a Minor 

Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

On Appeal from the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas 

Honorable Cathy Stryker, Presiding Judge 

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-CI-07922

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-APPELLEES’ REPLY TO NEW 

ARGUMENT IN CROSS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF 

THAT RULE 167.4(a) IS INVALID 

__________________________________________________________________ 

On February 19, 2014, Cross-Appellants filed their Reply Brief, which 

presents an argument at pages 6-7 that was not presented in their Cross-Appellants’ 

Brief, namely, that Rule 167.4(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure is invalid 

and unenforceable because it allegedly conflicts with Chapter 42 of the Civil 

Practices and Remedies Code, even though the Texas Supreme Court issued Rule 

167 to implement Chapter 42. Cross-Appellees, United Parcel Service, Inc. and 

Roland Leal, have not had an opportunity to respond to this argument that Rule 

167.4(a) is invalid. Allowing them to file a Reply addressing this argument would 

assist the Court in deciding it by providing important authority and argument. 

ACCEPTED

04-014-00494-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/26/2015 1:47:59 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/26/2015 1:47:59 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2 

Cross-Appellees therefore request that this Court grant leave to file “CrossAppellees’ Reply to New Argument in Cross-Appellants’ Reply Brief that Rule 

167.4(a) Is Invalid” that has been electronically filed along with this motion. 

Respectfully submitted, 

KING & SPALDING LLP 

By: /s/ H. Victor Thomas 

H. Victor Thomas 

Texas Bar No. 19851500 

1100 Louisiana, Suite 4000 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 751-3200 

Facsimile: (713) 751-3290 

W. Randall Bassett 

Georgia Bar No. 41525 

King & Spalding LLP 

1180 Peachtree Street, N.E. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Telephone: (404) 572-4600 

Facsimile: (404) 572-5100 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

As required by TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1, I conferred with counsel for Appellees 

and Cross-Appellants Robert Scott Rankin, et. al. and they communicated that they 

are opposed to this motion. 

Certified on March 26, 2015. 

/s/ H. Victor Thomas 

H. Victor Thomas 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on March 26, 2015, I used the Court’s electronic case filing 

system to file this Motion and to serve it on counsel for appellees as follows: 

Doug Perrin 

Mark Perrin 

The Perrin Law Firm 

325 N. Saint Paul St., Suite 600 

Dallas, TX 75201-3828 

Peter D. Marketos 

Reese Gordon Marketos LLP 

750 N. Saint Paul St., Suite 610 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

/s/ H. Victor Thomas 

H. Victor Thomas
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New York [Mr. Owens] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. OWENS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```