alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis B. Gillings, Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                  
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Dennis B.
Gillings                                           
| |  | Dennis B. Gillings
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                                                  
| |  | November 14, 2003                                                
| |  | Date                                                             

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 12 .1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Geoffrey B. Genovese, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Envoy CapitalGroup Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Envoy Capital Group Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and l5d-l5(e))for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
74

 
**Exhibit 12.1** (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.      ENVOY CAPITAL GROUP INC.
News United States Air Force
 India and US sign Project Agreement for Air-Launched Unmanned Aerial VehiclePublished Sept. 3, 2021
                        
                        
                        JOINT PRESS STATEMENT
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Ministry of Defence of India and U.S. Department of Defense concluded a Project Agreement (PA) for Air-Launched Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (ALUAV) under the Joint Working Group Air Systems in the Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI), on Friday, July 30, 2021. The Air-Launched UAV PA falls under the Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation (RDT&E) Memorandum of Agreement between the Indian Ministry of Defence and the U.S. Department of Defense that was first signed in January 2006, and renewed in January 2015. The agreement is a significant step towards deepening the defense technology collaboration between the two nations, through co-development of defence equipment.

The main aim of the DTTI is to bring sustained leadership focus to promote collaborative technology exchange, and create opportunities for co-production and co-development of future technologies for Indian and U.S. military forces. Under the DTTI, Joint Working Groups on land, naval, air, and aircraft carrier technologies have been established to focus on mutually agreed projects in respective domains. The PA for co-development of ALUAV has been overseen by the Joint Working Group on Air Systems and is a major accomplishment for DTTI.

The PA outlines the collaboration between Air Force Research Laboratory, Indian Air Force, and Defence Research and Development Organization towards design, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation of systems to co-develop an ALUAV Prototype. The Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE) at the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Aerospace Systems Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), along with the Indian and US Air Forces, are the principal organisations for execution of the PA.

The agreement was signed by the co-chairs of the Joint Working Group Air Systems under the DTTI, Air Vice Marshal Narmdeshwar Tiwari, Assistant Chief of Air Staff for Plans, from the Indian Air Force and Brigadier General Brian R. Bruckbauer, Director, Air Force Security Assistance and Cooperation Directorate, from the U.S. Air Force.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Ministry of Defence of India 



Project Agreement 



ALUAV 



Air-Launched Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 



Joint Working Group Air Systems 



top stories 



Aircraft 



Defence Technology and Trade Initiative 



DTTI 



research 



development 



testing 



evaluation 



RDT&E 



MOA 



DOD 



collaboration 



technology 



AFRL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919606
<NAME> PROTOKOPOS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,338
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  93,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,440
<PP&E>                                         74,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          99,678
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,532
<OTHER-SE>                                     (54,720)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,440
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,625
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  31,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,418)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        

             
<PAGE>



</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ELLA CHILLIOUS.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN KOENIG.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5371]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1600
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempore [Mr. Solomon] at 4 o'clock p.m.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 Certifications of the CEO AND CFO  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ GEOFFREY B. GENOVESEName:
    Geoffrey B. GenoveseTitle:
    Chairman, President and
Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ J. JOSEPH LEEDERName:
    J. Joseph LeederTitle:
    Vice President Mergers and Acquisitions
and Chief Financial Officer  78
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Empowering future female leaders: Nevada Guard Women’s Leadership Forum returns 

              - Published  March 7, 2022
              -                             By Senior Airman Michelle Brooks                                                    
              - 152nd Airlift Wing

**NEVADA AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Nev. (AFNS)  --  **

The Nevada National Guard held the second annual Women’s Leadership Forum jointly at the Nevada Air National Guard Base and at the Las Vegas Readiness Center, March 4. The event was dedicated to Women’s History Month and the goal of the forum was to empower and educate leaders, especially women, and work towards building an inclusive workplace culture. 

“When you’re talking about diversity, equity and inclusion–and you’re talking about leadership development–those are all strategic priorities and force multipliers for us as an organization,” said Maj. Gen. Ondra Berry, Nevada adjutant general. “It makes us more ready to do the work for this great state and this great nation.” 

The theme of the forum was SAFE: Self Advocate. Ally. Find Your Voice. Empower.  

Keynote speakers of the event included Chief Master Sgt. Lisa Perry, Colorado Air National Guard command senior enlisted leader, who spoke to attendees about embracing diversity and empowering the next generation of female leaders. In addition, keynote speaker Col. David Chauvin, Nevada Air National Guard chief of staff, spoke about becoming a better ally.  

“You can’t always understand, but you can listen – you can validate,” Chauvin said.  

The event included breakout sessions with military and civilian women leaders focused on women finding their voice and self-advocacy. Forum attendees included junior enlisted members, noncommissioned officers and commissioned officers and all participated in the leadership discussions. The sessions allowed women to share their stories and respond to questions from attendees on topics such as leadership, challenges, mentorship and career development.  

“I’ve taken an interesting path to where I am,” said Col. Mary Devine, U.S. property and fiscal officer for Nevada, during a breakout session. “It is my responsibility to make things better for leaders who follow.” During her session, Devine emphasized the importance of being open to lifelong learning, being an advocate for yourself and others in addition to taking care of family.  

Senior Airman Katie Grover, military personnel management assistant assigned to Joint Force Headquarters and 2021 recipient of Outstanding Airman of the Year, attended the forum and reflected on her experience.  

“I hope to inspire other women Airmen by taking the examples given today,” Grover said. “Even if you’re an E-3 or an E-4, it helped show me as a junior enlisted Airman that women can help each other be stronger and better leaders.” 

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceANGAir National GuardNevada National GuardWomen’s Leadership Forumempoweringfemaleleader
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: November 23, 2004

By: /s/
   --------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### E. L. WELCH COMPANY v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY.1

December 26, 1919.

No. 21,520.

Carrier — presentation of claim by shipper — waiver of right by carrier.

The clause in the uniform bill of lading limiting the time within which a claim against the carrier in case of loss of shipment may be made, may be waived by the carrier. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,378.60 for the conversion of a carload of oats. The amended answer set up as a *472defense the provision in the uniform bill of lading, under which the shipment was. made, that “claims for loss, damage or delay, must be made in writing to the carrier at point of delivery, or at point of origin, within four months after delivery of the property, or, in case of failure to make delivery, then within four months after a reasonable time for delivery has elapised. Unless claims are so made the carrier shall not be liable,” and alleged that no claim was made within the time specified. The reply alleged that defendant fully waived that requirement. The case was tried before ¡Hale, J., who at the close of the testimony granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed. Reversed and new trial granted.

*JB. V. Mercer & Go.*and *Andrew N. Johnson,*for appellant.

*F. W. Boot*and *Oolin W. Wright,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 175 N. W. 100.

Pee Cubiam.

.On February *27,*1915, the Farmers’ Co-operative Society shipped a car of oats from Alpha, Minnesota, over the defendant’s line of railroad, under the usual uniform bill of lading, consigned to plaintiff at Minneapolis. The bill of lading contained the usual four months’ limitation provision for making claim for loss in ease the carrier failed to deliver the shipment. Plaintiff was a commission merchant at Minneapolis, received the bill of lading and paid the shipper for the oats in the usual course of business. The defendant failed to deliver the shipment. No claim for los|s was made until May 17, 1916.

This action was ‘brought on the theory of conversion, to recover the value of the car of oats. Defendant pleaded the limitation clause as a .bar to plaintiff’s right of recovery. The reply set up a waiver of the limitation clause. There was testimony in support of a waiver. At the close of the testimony the trial court directed a verdict for defendant, upon the theory that the defendant could not waive the limitation claujse as it would be contrary to the statutes of the state. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the trial court was in error. The rule is no longer an open question in this state. The carrier may waive the provisions of such limitation clause. Robinson v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 123 Minn. 495, 144 N. W. 220; Naumen v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 131 Minn. 217, 154 N. W. 1076; Shama v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. 128 Minn. 522, 151 N. W. 406; Ferris v. M. *&*St. L. R. Co. 143 Minn. 90, 173 N. W. 178.

The order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is reversed and a new trial granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7117]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  (During today's session of the Senate, the following morning business 
was transacted.)

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                                  Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Robert C. Brehm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d)of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                            /S/ Robert C. Brehm
                                            --------------------
                                            Robert C. Brehm
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            May 19, 2003