alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### R. E. Cowart v. J. M. Oram.

(No. 1852, Op. Book No. 3, p. 738.)

Error from Dallas County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 183. *Appeal from, justice's to county court; returnable, when.*A regular term of tbe county court convened March 15, 1880. The appeal from justice’s court was perfected March 18, 1880. On April 2, 1880, that being a day in the same term of the court, a judgment was rendered in the case. *Held,*that the appeal was not returnable to that term of the court, and the court had no authority to render the judgment at that term. [R. S. art. 1641.]

§ 184. *Judgment nunc pro tunc; notice of motion for, must be given, and motion must be supported by proof. A.*judgment *nunc pro tunc*was entered upon minutes of the clerk of the court, without notice to the party against whom it was entered, and without evidence in support of the motion. *Held,*that the proceeding was without authority of law, and was a judgment without notice and without evidence to support it. [R. S. art. 1354 et seq.]

Reversed and remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

# AGENCY:

Economics and Statistics Administration, Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Below is a listing of individuals who are eligible to serve on the Performance Review Board in accordance with the Economics and Statistics Administration's Senior Executive Service and Senior Professional Performance Management Systems:

William G. Bostic, Jr.,

Brian Callahan,

Nancy M. Gordon,

Howard R. Hogan,

Arnold A. Jackson,

Theodore A. Johnson,

Steven J. Jost,

J. Steven Landefeld,

Jennifer Madans,

Marilia Matos,

Brian E. McGrath,

Thomas L. Mesenbourg,

Brent R. Moulton,

Brian C. Moyer,

Joel D. Platt,

Nancy A. Potok,

Obie G. Whichard,

James K. White.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Latasha Ellis, 301-763-3727.

Dated: September 9, 2010.

James K. White,

Associate Under Secretary for Management, Chair, Performance Review Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-23433 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-BS-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Creshawn Dupri Howard

, * From the 104 th District Court

o f T aylor County,

Trial Court No

. 22485

- B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 065

- CR * November 16 , 2023

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael W. Perry, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. ("IndyMac Bancorp"), certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IndyMac Bancorp;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | /s/MICHAEL W. PERRYMichael W. Perry Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
May 12, 2008

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EDAC
Technologies Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended July 3, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Dominick A. Pagano, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:     August 3, 2004                      /s/ Dominick A. Pagano
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Dominick A. Pagano
                                               Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EDAC Technologies Corporation and will be retained by EDAC
Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request
Exhibit 32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Veritec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Van Tran, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  ·
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  ·
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  /s/Van Tran
 Van Tran, Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: February 14, 2011
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-4 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-4 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5383]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has examined the Journal of the 
last day's proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

                          ____________________
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2021

NO. 03-19-00848-CR

Derek Grinstead, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction. 

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant pleaded 

“not guilty” and that the “findings on deadly weapon” is “yes.” The judgment, as modified, 

is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
#### CORNELIUS VAN HOUTEN v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
32





Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2008 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by
Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
December 15, 2008







/s/ Philip
Holmes


Philip
Holmes


Chief
Executive Officer







/s/ Robert
Kainz


Robert
Kainz


Chief
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2541-000]


Maple Analytics, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 10, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Maple Analytics, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 30, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5a3a0b7a6aa8b898c8b80b69095958a9791a583809786cb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23222 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Wardell FRANKS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 00-205

11 S.W.3d 561

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 9, 2000

*Bishop & Bishop,*by: *Eric T. Bishop,*for appeUant.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

Warden Franks, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Eric T. Bishop, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion wfil be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Strasbaugh (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to their knowledge:

      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  July 30, 2008                  By: /s/ Chuck Schillings
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chuck Schillings
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (principal executive officer)


Dated:  July 30, 2008                  By: /s/ Richard Nance
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard Nance
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (principal financial officer)

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 110-92 is 
further amended by striking 

              

the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 21, 
2007''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 13, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARREN WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 517 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 74 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 74

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

   Mr. Gohmert introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Marriage in the United States shall consist only of a legal union 
of one man and one woman.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 48 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 48

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding the requirement of the approval of a two-thirds majority of 
 the Supreme Court for any pardon or reprieve granted by the President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 2007

Mr. Cohen introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding the requirement of the approval of a two-thirds majority of 
 the Supreme Court for any pardon or reprieve granted by the President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``The grant of a reprieve or pardon by the President for an offense 
against the United States shall become effective only on the review and 
consent of two-thirds of the Justices of the Supreme Court, pursuant to 
a finding by such Justices that the grant of such reprieve or pardon is 
consistent with the interests of justice and does not undermine the 
effectiveness, integrity, and impartiality of the Federal criminal 
justice system.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Adkinson & Chappell v. O. H. P. Garrett.

(No. 2, Op. Book No. 1, p. 268.)

Appeal from Washington County.

May 7, 1877.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 45. *Where a jury is waived and cause decided by judge.*When the court is substituted for the jury, its decision upon the facts has the same conclusive effect as the verdict of a jury. In such a case, unless the judgment of the court is without evidence, it will not be reversed on appeal. [Jordan v. McBrophy, 41 Tex. 283; Bailey v. White, 13 Tex. 114; Gilliard v. Chessney, 13 Tex. 337; McFarland v. Hall, 17 Tex. 690.]

§ 46. *Conflicting evidence.*In a case of conflicting evidence, in order to justify this court in setting aside a verdict on the ground that it is against.the weight of evidence, it is not sufficient that the verdict does not clearly appear to be right; it must clearly appear to be wrong, else it will not be disturbed. [Stroud v. Springfield, 28 Tex. 651; Powell v. Haley, 28 Tex. 53.]

Affirmed.