U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 ___________________  FORM 10-Q ____________________  (Mark One)  X.Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.  .Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  For the transition period fromN/A toN/A ____________________  Commission File No. 333-51274 ____________________  VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED (Name of small business issuer in its charter)  Delaware43-2033337(State or other(I.R.S. Employerjurisdiction of incorporation)identification No.)  18565 Soledad Canyon Rd., #153,Canyon Country, CA91351 (Address and Zip Code of Principal Executive Offices)  Registrant's Telephone Number: (310) 309-9080  Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None  Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share (Title of Class)  Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None  Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share (Title of Class)  Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes X.No .  Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a nonaccelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):  Large accelerated filer . Accelerated filer . NonAccelerated filer .Small Business Issuer X.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b2 of the Exchange Act). Yes . No X.  Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  ClassOutstanding at May 15, 2010Common stock, $0.001 par value6,566,702   VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED    PagePart I. Financial InformationItem 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements(a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 20103(b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)4(c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)5(d) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)6Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations16Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk16Item 4. Controls and Procedures16Part II. Other Information16Item 1. Legal Proceedings16Item 1A. Risk Factors16Item 2. Changes in Securities and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities19Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities19Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders19Item 5. Other Information19Item 6. Exhibits19Signatures20    2   PART I  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS      March 31,December 31,IN 000'S20102009(Unaudited)(Audited)ASSETS:CURRENT ASSETSCash and cash equivalents$1$2Other receivables29293031Property and equipment, net150150Other assets7575TOTAL ASSETS$255$256LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY:CURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts Payable and accrued expenses$1$-1-LONG-TERM LIABILITIESRelated Party328328Convertible debentures1,0001,000Total liabilities1,3291,328STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCommon stock $.001 par value;100,000,000 shares authorized and 6,566,702 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 20096767Additional paid-in capital22,45022,450Deferred stock based compensation(1,898)(1,898)Accumulated deficit(21,693)(21,691)Total Stockholders Equity(1,074)(1,072)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY$255$256  See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements   3   VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)  in 000'sThree monthsThree monthsMarch 31,March 31,20102009(Unaudited)(Unaudited)Revenue$-$-Operating expenses:Administrative expenses24Total operating expenses24Income (loss) from operations24Income (loss) before income taxes24Provision for income taxes--Net income (loss)$2$4Basic and diluted income (loss) per share$(0.00)$(0.00)Weighted average number of shares outstanding6,566,70298,646,272  See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements  4   VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)  March 31,
2010March 31,
2009CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet Income$(2)$(4)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activitiesDepreciation--(Increase) Decrease in:Increase (Decrease) in:Related Party14Net Cash Used In Operating Activities--CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESDecrease of liabilities from merger--Securities issued for merger--Net Cash Used in Investing Activities--NET DECREASE IN CASH(1)-CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD22CASH AT END OF PERIOD$1$2  See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements  5   VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  NOTE 1 - INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the Company), required to be consolidated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in the December 31, 2009 Form 10-K except for the accounting policy relating to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.  The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 included herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations relating to interim financial statements.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain only normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position as of March 31, 2010, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Certain prior year amounts have been restated or reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.  NOTE 2 - BUSINESS  VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware on September 20, 2000. Following its establishment, the Company organized, at the end of 2000, two wholly-owned subsidiaries: Safe Mail International Ltd., a company registered in the British Virgin Islands and Safe Mail Development Ltd., a company registered in Israel. As of August 31, 2004, the Company established two additional wholly-owned subsidiaries: VSUS Secured Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation and First Info Network, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Since inception, and until a recent shift in the focus of its business operations, the Company had been a developer and marketer of highly secure communications systems for use over the Internet.  Effective as of April 13, 2005, the Company reorganized its business by transferring substantially all of its business assets into VSUS Secured Services, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiary. Consequently, its two subsidiaries, Safe Mail Development Ltd. and Safe Mail International Ltd., became subsidiaries of VSUS Secured Services, Inc.  On April 14, 2005, VSUS Technologies Incorporated acquired 1stAlerts, Inc., a Delaware corporation (1stAlerts), a company that develops, markets and sells software applications, when 1stAlerts merged with and into the Company's wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary, First Info Network, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the 1stAlerts Acquisition. At the time of the 1stAlerts Acquisition, among other things: (i) the Company exchanged 13,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, and 200 shares of its Series B Participating Preferred Stock, for all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of 1stAlerts, (ii) the Company issued 1,861,841 of its Class A Warrants in exchange for warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock of 1stAlerts, (iii) the Company assumed $4,565,000 of promissory and convertible notes from 1stAlerts, and (iv) certain officers and directors of 1stAlerts became officers and directors of the Company. The 200 shares of series B Participating Preferred Stock, the 1.861,841 Class A Warrants which were never registered and a portion of the Convertible Notes were cancelled as a part of the June 24, 2009 Rescission Agreement with 1st Alerts. The Company returned all of the Capitol stock of 1st Alerts as part of the 2009 Rescission Agreement. No remaining 1st Alerts Officers and Directors currently serve as Officers or Directors of the Company.  Each of the 1,861,841 Class A Warrants the Company issued in connection with the 1stAlerts Acquisition have a term of a term of two years from the effective date of a registration statement the Company's obligated to file to register, among other of its securities, the shares of the Company's Common Stock underlying these warrants, and an exercise price of $0.19. The class A Warrants and the registration obligation of the company have been negated and cancelled pursuant to the 2009 Rescission Agreement.  6   BASIS OF PRESENTATION  1st Alerts Agreements have all been Rescinded  1st agrees that as consideration for the execution of this Rescission Agreement, it shall: (a) relinquish and forever waive any ownership claim or right to the 13,000,000 shares of VSUT common stock issued to the shareholders of 1st, or their designees pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement; including 200 shares of participating preferred shares issued subsequent to the Acquisition Agreement, and (b) to delivered forthwith to VSUT said shares, medallion guaranteed, with a notarized third party release, and notarized corporate resolution from 1st.  Management's plans in this regard include raising additional cash from current and potential stockholders and lenders, making strategic acquisitions and increasing the marketing of its products and services. As a result of the Company's acquisition of 1stAlerts, and the anticipated cash flow from the combined company's operations, the Company believes that it will have sufficient capital to fund its operations. However, until such time as the Company generates sufficient revenues from the sale of its products, the Company will continue to be dependent on raising substantial amounts of additional capital through any one of a combination of debt offerings or equity offerings. The Company has no current arrangements with respect to any additional financing. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any future financing will be available to the Company when needed, and on commercially reasonable terms. The Company's inability to derive sufficient revenues from the sale of its products, or obtain additional financing when needed, would have a material adverse effect on the company, requiring the Company to curtail or cease operations. In addition, any equity financing may involve substantial dilution to the Company's then current stockholders.  Being a development stage company, the Company is subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new enterprise and the marketing and manufacturing of a new product, many of which risks are beyond the control of the Company. All of these factors raise substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts that might be necessary as a result of the above uncertainty.  NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES   BASIS OF PRESENTATION  The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP"). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated  Financial Reporting  The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Revenues and expenses are reported on the accrual basis, which means that income is recognized as it is earned and expenses are recognized as they are incurred.  Use of Estimates  The Companys significant estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts and accrued expenses. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While the Company believes that such estimates are fair when considered in conjunction with the financial statements taken as a whole, the actual amounts of such estimates, when known, will vary from these estimates. If actual results significantly differ from the Companys estimates, the Companys financial condition and results of operations could be materially impacted.  Cash and Cash Equivalents  Cash and cash equivalents include all interest-bearing deposits or investments with maturities of three and nine months or less.  CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK  Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company maintains cash balances at one financial institution, which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC insured institution insures up to $250,000 on account balances. The amounts that are not insured by FDIC limitations are held in short-term securities.  7   Fair value of financial instruments  The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, debenture and loans payable approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.  Accounts Receivable  The Company extends credit to its customers in the normal course of business. Further, the Company regularly reviews outstanding receivables, and provides estimated losses through an allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the level of established loss reserves, the Company makes judgments regarding its customers ability to make required payments, economic events and other factors. As the financial condition of these parties change, circumstances develop or additional information becomes available, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required. The Company also performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers financial condition. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and such losses traditionally have been within its expectations.  IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS TO BE DISPOSED OF  The Company accounts for the impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of (SFAS No. 144). SFAS No. 144 requires write-downs to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets carrying amount.  GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS  In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets. It addresses how intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets (but not those acquired in a business combination) should be accounted for in financial statements upon their acquisition. This Statement also addresses how goodwill and other intangible assets should be accounted for after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements.  Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the periods benefited, with a weighted average useful life of 15 years.  In performing this assessment, management uses the income approach and the similar transactions method of the market approach to develop the fair value of the acquisition in order to assess its potential impairment of goodwill. The income approach is based on a discounted cash flow model which relies on a number of factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. Rates used to discount future cash flows are dependent upon interest rates and the cost of capital at a point in time. The similar transactions method is a market approach methodology in which the fair value of a business is estimated by analyzing the prices at which companies similar to the subject, which are used as guidelines, have sold in controlling interest transactions (mergers and acquisitions). Target companies are compared to the subject company, and multiples paid in transactions are analyzed and applied to subject company data, resulting in value indications. Comparability can be affected by, among other things, the product or service produced or sold, geographic markets served, competitive position, profitability, growth expectations, size, risk perception, and capital structure. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and managements judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment. It is possible that assumptions underlying the impairment analysis will change in such a manner that impairment in value may occur in the future.  REVENUE RECOGNITION  Revenue for services is recognized monthly as services are provided pursuant to the terms of contracts or purchase orders, which have prices that are fixed and determinable. The Company assesses the clients ability to meet the contract terms, including meeting payment obligations, before entering into the contract. Deferred revenue results from customers who are billed in advance of the period in which the services are provided, on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis.  8   The Company follows Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 (SAB 104), which requires the Company to defer certain installation revenue and expenses, primarily equipment related to, and direct labor incurred. The capitalized costs and deferred revenues related to the installation are then amortized over the life of an average customer relationship, on a straight line basis. If the customer is discontinued prior to the expiration of the original expected life, the unamortized portion of the deferred installation revenue and related capitalized costs are recognized in the period the discontinuation becomes effective. In accordance with EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, the service contracts that include both installation and video streaming are considered a single unit of accounting. The criteria in EITF 00-21 that the Company does not meet for services and installation services to be considered separate units of accounting is that the installation service to customers has no stand alone value. The installation service alone is not functional to customers without the service.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT  Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for major betterments and additions are capitalized while replacement, maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the lives of the respective assets, are currently charged to expense. Any gain or loss on disposition of assets is recognized currently in the statement of income.  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  The Company's financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and debt. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and approximate market interest rates of these instruments. The estimated fair value is not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange or from future earnings or cash flows.  INCOME TAXES  The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 requires that the Company determine whether the benefits of the Companys tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. The provisions of FIN 48 also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and there was no effect on the financial condition or results of operations as a result of implementing FIN 48. The Company does not have any interest and penalties in the statement of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE  Earnings (loss) per share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss), after deducting preferred stock dividends accumulated during the period, by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and other potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. The outstanding warrants for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively are anti-dilutive and therefore are not included in earnings (loss) per share.  ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION  The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". This statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service.  In addition, a public entity is required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of liability instruments based on its current fair value. The fair value of that award has been re-measured subsequently at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period.  For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not grant any stock options.  9   NON-EMPLOYEE STOCK BASED COMPENSATION  The cost of stock based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines enumerated in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services (EITF 96-18).  COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS  The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) issue No. 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock (EITF 00-19). Based on the provisions of EITF 00-19, the Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the company), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).  INCOME TAXES  The Company accounts for income taxes using SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that this interpretation will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.  In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 48-1,Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (the FSP). The FSP provides guidance about how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. Under the FSP, a tax position could be effectively settled on completion of examination by a taxing authority if the entity does not intend to appeal or litigate the result and it is remote that the taxing authority would examine or re-examine the tax position. The Company does not expect that this interpretation will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.  NOTE 3 - GOING-CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT'S PLAN  The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, as shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations since inception. Management anticipates incurring additional losses in 2010 and 2009. Further, the Company may incur additional losses thereafter, depending on its ability to generate revenues from the licensing or sale of its technologies and products. The Company's technologies and products have never been utilized on a large-scale commercial basis and there is no assurance that any of its technologies or products will receive market acceptance. As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company's operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, resulted in a net loss of $2,000 and the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of approximately $21,693,000 through the period ended March 31, 2010.  This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans as to these matters. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.  Management's plans in this regard include raising additional cash from current and potential stockholders and lenders, making strategic acquisitions and increasing the marketing of its products and services. However, until such time as the Company generates sufficient revenues from the sale of its products, the Company will continue to be dependent on raising substantial amounts of additional capital through any one of a combination of debt offerings or equity offerings. The Company has no current arrangements with respect to any additional financing. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any future financing will be available to the Company when needed, and on commercially reasonable terms. The Company's inability to derive sufficient revenues from the sale of its products, or obtain additional financing when needed, would have a material adverse effect on the company, requiring the Company to curtail or cease operations. In addition, any equity financing may involve substantial dilution to the Company's then current stockholders.  10   Being a development stage company, the Company is subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new enterprise and the marketing and manufacturing of a new product, many of which risks are beyond the control of the Company. All of these factors raise substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts that might be necessary as a result of the above uncertainty.  NOTE 4 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS  Participating Securities Granted in Share-Based Transactions  Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share(formerly FASB Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities).The new guidance clarifies that non-vested share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receive nonforfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents before vesting should be considered participating securities and included in basic earnings per share. The Companys adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material effect on previously issued or current earnings per share.  Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests  Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 805, Business Combinations(formerly SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations).The new standard applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. Additionally, the new standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement date for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose additional information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. The Companys adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 810, Consolidations(formerly SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements). The new accounting standard establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (or minority interests) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary by requiring all noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be reported in the same way, as equity in the consolidated financial statements. As such, this guidance has eliminated the diversity in accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. The Companys adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure  Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures(ASC 820) (formerly FASB FSP No 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157),which delayed the effective date for disclosing all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). This standard did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when a transaction is not orderly and for estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820 (formerly FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly), requires disclosure of the inputs and valuation techniques used, as well as any changes in valuation techniques and inputs used during the period, to measure fair value in interim and annual periods. In addition, the presentation of the fair value hierarchy is required to be presented by major security type as described in ASC 320, Investments  Debt and Equity Securities. The provisions of the new standard were effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the new standard on April 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  In April 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 820, (formerly FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments).The new standard requires disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies in addition to the annual disclosure required at year-end. The provisions of the new standard were effective for the interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Companys adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  11   In August 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820, provides clarification that in certain circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a company is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following valuation techniques: the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, the quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurements. The new guidance clarifies that a company is not required to include an adjustment for restrictions that prevent the transfer of the liability and if an adjustment is applied to the quoted price used in a valuation technique, the result is a Level 2 or 3 fair value measurement. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after August 27, 2009. The Companys adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities  Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging(SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133). The new accounting standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Since the new accounting standard only required additional disclosure, the adoption did not impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.  Other-Than-Temporary Impairments  In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for other-than-temporary impairments. Under the new guidance, which is part of ASC 320, Investments  Debt and Equity Securities(formerly FSP 115-2 and 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments),an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized when an entity has the intent to sell a debt security or when it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery in value.The new guidance does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Companys adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  Subsequent Events  In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for subsequent events. The new guidance, which is part of ASC 855, Subsequent Events(formerly SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events)is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this guidance sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ended after June 15, 2009 and will be applied prospectively. The Companys adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was (date of filing) April 15, 2010.  Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective  Accounting for the Transfers of Financial Assets  In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to SFAS No.140, was adopted into Codification in December 2009 through the issuance of Accounting Standards Updated (ASU) 2009-16. The new standard eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company will adopt the new guidance in 2010 and is evaluating the impact it will have to the Companys consolidated financial statements.  12   Accounting for Variable Interest Entities  In June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167, Amending FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),was adopted into Codification in December 2009 through the issuance of ASU 2009-17. The revised guidance amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, in determining whether an enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This determination identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impacts the entitys economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The revised guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary and eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary. The Company does not expect that the provisions of the new guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.  Revenue Recognition  In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. The new standard changes the requirements for establishing separate units of accounting in a multiple element arrangement and requires the allocation of arrangement consideration to each deliverable based on the relative selling price. The selling price for each deliverable is based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) if available, third-party evidence if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE or third-party evidence is available. ASU 2009-13 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect that the provisions of the new guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.  In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-14, "Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements"("ASU No. 2009-14"). ASU No. 2009-14 amends guidance included within ASC Topic 985-605 to exclude tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality. Entities that sell joint hardware and software products that meet this scope exception will be required to follow the guidance of ASU No. 2009-13. ASU No. 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption and retrospective application are also permitted. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU No. 2009-14.  Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities  ASU 2009-17 amends prior guidance to change how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. ASU 2009-17 requires additional disclosures about the reporting entitys involvement with variable-interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement as well as its affect on the entitys financial statements. The provisions of ASU 2009-17 became effective on January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.  Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures  Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements  ASU 2010-06 amends ASC Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures  Overall, and requires reporting entities to disclose (1) the amount of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers, and (2) separate information about purchases, sales, issuance and settlements in the reconciliation of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). ASU 2010-06 also requires reporting entities to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclose the inputs and valuation techniques for fair value measurements that fall within Levels 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy. These disclosures and clarification are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The provisions of ASU 2010-06 became effective on January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.  Subsequent Events  Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements  ASU 2010-09 amends ASC Subtopic 855-10, Subsequent Events  Overall (ASC 855-10) and requires an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued but removed the requirement to disclose this date in the notes to the entitys financial statements. The amendments are effective upon issuance of the final update and accordingly, the Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-09 during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The adoption of these provisions did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.  13   Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets  ASU 2009-16 amends prior accounting guidance to enhance reporting about transfers of financial assets, including securitizations, and where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. ASU 2009-16 eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. ASU 2009-16 also requires additional disclosures about all continuing involvements with transferred financial assets including information about gains and losses resulting from transfers during the period. The provisions of ASU 2009-16 became effective on January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.  Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)  Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements  ASU 2009-13 requires the use of the relative selling price method when allocating revenue in these types of arrangements. This method allows a vendor to use its best estimate of selling price if neither vendor specific objective evidence nor third party evidence of selling price exists when evaluating multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard update will have on its financial statements.  Software (Topic 985)  Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements  ASU 2009-14 requires tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that work together to deliver the products essential functionality to be evaluated under the accounting standard regarding multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company does not expect that this standard update will have a significant impact on its financial statements.  Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.  ASU 2010-11 clarifies that the only form of an embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements are those that relate to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The provisions of ASU 2010-11 will be effective on July 1, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.  Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades  ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.  Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.  NOTE 5 - RECLASSIFICATIONS  Certain prior periods' balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period's financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported results of operations or stockholders' equity.  NOTE 6 - COMMON STOCK  LOSS PER COMMON SHARE  Basic loss per common share is computed based upon weighted-average shares outstanding and excludes any potential dilution. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution from the exercise or conversion of all dilutive securities into Common Stock based upon the average market price of common shares outstanding during the period. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, no effect has been given to outstanding options, warrants, convertible debentures and convertible preferred stock in the diluted computation, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.  14   Securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share (EPS) in the future, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented, consist of the following:  Convertible Debt1,428,571Total as of March 31, 20101,428,571  (1) Based on conversion rate of .70% of bid price.  NOTE 7 - ACQUISITION  On April 14, 2005, the Company consummated the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of 1stAlerts. At the time of the acquisition, among other things: (i) the Company exchanged 13,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, and 200 shares of its Series B Participating Preferred Stock, for all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of 1stAlerts, (ii) the Company issued 1,861,841 of its Class A Warrants in exchange for warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock of 1stAlerts, (iii) the Company assumed $4,565,000 of promissory and convertible notes from 1stAlerts, and (iv) certain officers and directors of 1stAlerts became officers and directors of the Company. The 200 shares of series B Participating Preferred Stock, the 1.861,841 Class A Warrants which were never registered and a portion of the Convertible Notes were cancelled as a part of the June 24, 2009 Rescission Agreement with 1st Alerts. The Company returned all of the Capitol stock of 1st Alerts as part of the 2009 Rescission Agreement. No remaining 1st Alerts Officers and Directors currently serve as Officers or Directors of the Company.  Each of the 1,861,841 Class A Warrants the Company issued in connection with the 1stAlerts Acquisition have a term of a term of two years from the effective date of a registration statement the Company's obligated to file to register, among other of its securities, the shares of the Company's Common Stock underlying these warrants, and an exercise price of $0.19. The class A Warrants and the registration obligation of the company have been negated and cancelled pursuant to the 2009 Rescission Agreement.  NOTE 8 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT  Property and equipment at March 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):  Computer hardware$349-$-Less: Accumulated depreciation199$150  NOTE 9 - CONVERTIBLE LOAN AND SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK  The note and warrants described were rescinded on June 24, 2009.  NOTE 10 - CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES  Interest and principal was amended and forgiven as part of the 2009 1 stAlerts Rescission agreement.  The amended promissory note amount due is now $1,328,571, due to the 2009 1 stAlerts Rescission agreement. The due date for the Promissory Note was extended to June 24, 2011, the rate is at 10% per annum.  NOTE 11- SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY  STOCK OPTION GRANTS AND EXERCISES  None  PREFERRED STOCK  Preferred stock has been returned to treasury with rescission agreement.  15   ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009  Sales were $-0- for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and for the three month period ended March 31, 2009.  Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from $2,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 from $4,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 due to costs associated with the operations of the public company.  Net loss decreased from $2,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 from a net loss of $4,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2009, due to the above analysis of Income and Expenses.   ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.   ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, at March 31 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective. However as of the date of the filing of the Form 10Q/A management has implemented changes that it has determined will make it financial reporting process effective as of the date of this filing.  Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  PART II OTHER INFORMATION   ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  The Company is not a party to any litigation and, to its knowledge, no action, suit or proceeding has been threatened against the Company.   ITEM 1A - RISK FACTORS  POSSIBLE PENNY STOCK REGULATION  Any trading of our common stock in the Pink Sheets or on the OTC Bulletin Board may be subject to certain provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, commonly referred to as the penny stock rule.  Our common stock is deemed to be penny stock as that term is defined in Rule 3a51-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Penny stocks are stock:  · With a price of less than $5.00 per share; · That are not traded on a recognized national exchange; · Whose prices are not quoted on the Nasdaq automated quotation system (Nasdaq listed stock must still have a price of not less than $5.00 per share); or · In issuers with net tangible assets less than $2.0 million (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5.0 million (if in continuous operation for less than three years), or with average revenues of less than $6.0 million for the last three years.  Broker/dealers dealing in penny stocks are required to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks. Moreover, broker/dealers are required to determine whether an investment in a penny stock is a suitable investment for a prospective investor. These requirements may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them. This could cause our stock price to decline.  16   BECAUSE WE ARE QUOTED ON THE OTCBB INSTEAD OF AN EXCHANGE OR NATIONAL QUOTATION SYSTEM, OUR INVESTORS MAY HAVE A TOUGHER TIME SELLING THEIR STOCK OR EXPERIENCE NEGATIVE VOLATILITY ON THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK.  Our common stock is traded on the OTCBB. The OTCBB is often highly illiquid, in part because it does not have a national quotation system by which potential investors can follow the market price of shares except through information received and generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that make markets in particular stocks. There is a greater chance of volatility for securities that trade on the OTCBB as compared to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including the lack of readily available price quotations, the absence of consistent administrative supervision of bid and ask quotations, lower trading volume, and market conditions. Investors in our common stock may experience high fluctuations in the market price and volume of the trading market for our securities. These fluctuations, when they occur, have a negative effect on the market price for our securities. Accordingly, our stockholders may not be able to realize a fair price from their shares when they determine to sell them or may have to hold them for a substantial period of time until the market for our common stock improves.  RISKS RELATING TO OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK  Although there is presently a market for our common stock, the price of our common stack may be extremely volatile and investors may not be able to sell their shares at or above their purchase price, or at all. We anticipate that the market may be potentially highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially because of:  · Actual or anticipated fluctuations in our future business and operating results; · Changes in or failure to meet market expectations; · Fluctuations in stock market price and volume  WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY DIVIDENDS  We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We may not have sufficient funds to legally pay dividends. Even if funds are legally available to pay dividends, we may nevertheless decide in our sole discretion not to pay dividends. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the board of directors, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of our operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors our board of directors may consider relevant. There is no assurance that we will pay any dividends in the future, and, if dividends are rapid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.  FAILURE TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.  It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal auditing and other finance staff in order to develop and implement appropriate additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with these requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may not be able to obtain the independent accountant certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires of publicly traded companies.  If we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control over financial reporting or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may identify, such failure could result in material misstatements in our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.  Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal period ending March 31, 2007, we will be required to prepare assessments regarding internal controls over financial reporting and beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal period ending March 31, 2010, furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. We have begun the process of documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order to satisfy these requirements, which is likely to result in increased general and administrative expenses and may shift management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. While our management is expending significant resources in an effort to complete this important project, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our objective on a timely basis. There also can be no assurance that our auditors will be able to issue an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment or complete our Section 404 certifications could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.  17   In addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover material weaknesses in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The PCAOB defines significant deficiency as a deficiency that results in more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.  In the event that a material weakness is identified, we will employ qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to address any material weaknesses that we identify. However, the process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.  Any failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal controls and, in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.  THE MARKET PRICE FOR OUR COMMON SHARES IS PARTICULARLY VOLATILE GIVEN OUR STATUS AS A RELATIVELY UNKNOWN COMPANY WITH A SMALL AND THINLY TRADED PUBLIC FLOAT, LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND LACK OF PROFITS WHICH COULD LEAD TO WIDE FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR SHARE PRICE.  The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, we are a speculative or risky investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date, and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.  Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the volatility of our share price.  18   VOLATILITY IN OUR COMMON SHARE PRICE MAY SUBJECT US TO SECURITIES LITIGATION, THEREBY DIVERTING OUR RESOURCES THAT MAY HAVE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON OUR PROFITABILITY AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.  As discussed in the preceding risk factors, the market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert managements attention and resources.  OUR BUSINESS PLAN CALLS FOR EXTENSIVE AMOUNTS OF FUNDING AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN SUCH FUNDING WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.  We will be relying on additional financing and funding. We are currently in discussions with potential sources of financing but no definitive agreements are in place. If we cannot achieve the requisite financing or complete the projects as anticipated, this could adversely affect our business, the results of our operations, prospects and financial condition.  SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED.  ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES  There were no changes in securities during the period ended March 31, 2010   ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES  There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended March 31, 2010.  ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS  There were no matters submitted to the vote of securities holders during the period ended March 31, 2010.  ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION  None.  ITEM 6. EXHIBITS  Exhibits:  31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.   19   SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized,.  VSUS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED.Date: May 15, 2010By:/s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkChief Executive Officer   20