alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES: 

Tuesday, September 21, 2010, at 10 a.m.; and Wednesday, September 22, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Tuesday, September 21, at 10 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Pricing.

3. Financial Matters.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

## Wednesday, September 22, at 8:30 a.m. (Closed)—if needed

Continuation of Tuesday's agenda.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-22876 Filed 9-9-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 30057 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Demetrius Pearson,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:22

- CR

- 18

- 4

**_________________ _____________**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Demetrius Pearson has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pearson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 21, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30057 Document: 00516904538 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023No. 23

- 30057

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 23-30057 Document: 00516904538 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/21/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                  1,685
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             544
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,249
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      37
<BONDS>                                   233
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                              4,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            4,620
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          213
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (164)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (164)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (5.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (5.63)


</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 The Air Force Podcast: A Conversation on Resiliency with CMSAF WrightPublished Nov. 27, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Ashley New
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                On this episode of The Air Force Podcast, Staff Sgt. Ashley New sat down with Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright to talk about resiliency.



>The Air Force Podcast 



Staff Sgt. Ashley New 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright 



CMSAF 



resiliency 



podcast 



AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LESTER BRADLEY.

May 14, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 1, 2013 | By:    | /s/  Michael LaBarbera                                                   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Michael LaBarbera                                                             |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) |
[No. 44855-2-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### Dennis J. Perkins, *Appellant,*v. Local 32, United Association of Plumbers & Pipefitters, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-22102-0, Ann Schindler, J., entered June 23, 1999. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Agid, C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Appelwick, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report (the Report) on the Form 10-K of Monarchy Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended October 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Tim Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: February 17, 2013  /s/ TIM FERGUSON Tim Ferguson Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary and Director
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-194873 and File No. 333-205011) of 58.com Inc. of our report dated June 28,2017 relating to the financial statements of 58 Daojia Inc., which appears in this Amendment No.1 to Form 20-F.

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China

June 28, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Engineered Support
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31,
2005 (the "Report"), I, Gerald A. Potthoff, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)  The Report complies with Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 14, 2005
      --------------

By: /s/ Gerald A. Potthoff
    -------------------------------
    Gerald A. Potthoff
    Vice Chairman, Chief
    Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and will be retained by
Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE 
SHEET STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             446                     446
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,479                   3,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (577)                   (577)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,120                   3,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,620                   6,620
<PP&E>                                           1,604                   1,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (926)                   (926)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,322                   7,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,154                   4,154
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        940                     940
<COMMON>                                        12,111                  12,111
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,907)                 (9,907)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,322                   7,322
<SALES>                                          2,407                   6,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,407                   6,866
<CGS>                                            1,486                   4,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,486                   4,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,477                   4,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14                      13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,570)                 (2,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,570)                 (2,094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,570)                 (2,094)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)                  (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)                  (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 64th AEG provides vaccination support to FEMA in MichiganPublished March 18, 2021
                        
                        By Air Forces Northern
                        
                        
                        64th Air Expeditionary Group
                **TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Fielding of additional Air Force medical personnel to support**COVID-19** response operations in Michigan has kept **First Air Force**’s 64th Air Expeditionary Group busy tracking Airmen set to join the multi-service effort.“Our efforts are focused on ensuring our Airmen are able to swiftly and safely support FEMA’s COVID-19 vaccination mission requirements,” said**Lt. Gen. Kirk Pierce**, commander of Continental U.S. NORAD Region – **First Air Force (Air Forces Northern)**. “The 1st AF staff diligently supports our 64th AEG Airmen from across the country as they prepare to deploy to Ford Field. Our responsibility is to ensure our Airmen are where they’re needed, when they’re needed, in order to help our DoD counterparts and federal, state and local officials as part of a whole-of-America COVID-19 response.”At the request of the**Federal Emergency Management Agency**, approximately 220 Department of Defense military medical and support personnel will deploy to Michigan to support a state-run, federally supported community vaccination center. **U.S. Army North**, the Joint Force Land Component Command of**U.S. Northern Command**, will oversee the multi-service military COVID-19 response operation in support of state and the federal vaccination pilot.“Our joint force continues to support FEMA and the acceleration of federal vaccination efforts in order to get all Americans vaccinated as soon as possible,” said**Lt. Gen. Laura J. Richardson**, ARNORTH and JFLCC commander. “Once open, this site in Michigan will have the ability to administer 6,000 vaccines a day.”The 222-person, Type 1 Air Force Team, arriving March 19, will support the CVC at Ford Field in Detroit.

According to FEMA, a Type 1 Team is capable of administering up to 6,000 vaccinations a day. For more information regarding these teams and CVCs, please refer to the FEMA community vaccination center’s **playbook**.These military medical and support personnel join approximately 2,700 others from the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force already supporting the federal vaccination effort in California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

To date, these military personnel have administered approximately 700,000 vaccines.vaccination 



response 



pandemic 



FEMA 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Forces Northern 



64th Air Expeditionary Group 



COVID-19 



vaccine 



Michigan 



First Air Force
News United States Air Force
 Ebbing ANGB selected to host F-35 training center for FMS participants, RSAF F-16 trainingPublished June 3, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected **Ebbing Air National Guard Base**, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the preferred location to establish an **F-35 Lightning II** training center for Foreign Military Sales participants and the new location for the 425th Fighter Squadron, a Republic of Singapore air force **F-16 Fighting Falcon** training unit currently based at **Luke Air Force Base**, Arizona.
This decision comes after several U.S. ally and partner nations showed interest in conducting F-35 training at a U.S.-based F-35 training facility. Ramp and airspace capacity constraints at Luke AFB limit expansion. This new training center will have capacity for up to 36 fighter aircraft.
The F-35 provides next-generation stealth capabilities to the U.S. and many U.S. ally and partner nations with its aerodynamic performance, advanced integrated avionics, enhanced situational awareness and increased survivability.
“The F-35 program is a multi-service, multi-national effort that dramatically increases interoperability between the U.S. and other F-35 partner nations,” said Acting Secretary of the Air Force **John P. Roth**. “We are fully committed to the F-35 as the cornerstone of the U.S. Air Force’s fighter fleet and look forward to building stronger relationships with nations who want to work by our side.”
Foreign Military Sales is a security assistance program authorized by the Arms Export Control Act. The act allows the U.S. to sell defense equipment, conduct training and provide services to a foreign country when the president deems that doing so will strengthen U.S. national security and promote world peace.
Following this decision, the Department of the Air Force will conduct an environmental impact analysis to confirm Ebbing ANGB can support the new F-35 and F-16 missions. This selection also establishes **Selfridge ANGB**, Michigan, as an alternate location in the rare case the environmental impact analysis determines the preferred location unsuitable. The Department of the Air Force anticipates making the final basing decision in spring 2023.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



F-35 



f-16 



Lightning II 



Fighting Falcon 



Ebbing ANGB 



Air National Guard 



FMS 



foreign military sales 



Luke AFB 



Republic of Singapore Air Force
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Traficant] come 
forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. TRAFICANT led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                            2,011 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    21,830 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 23,841 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,482,229 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,988,733 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                  (80,381,045)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,482,229 
<SALES>                            0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                117,682 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                158,256 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               93,079 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (133,653)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (2,681,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                 (2,681,788)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (2,575)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (2,575)

        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30184

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKEY D. DAVIS, also known as Rickey Davis,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-175-ALL-N

- - - - - - - - - -

October 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rickey D. Davis appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for one count of bank robbery. As part of his

plea agreement, Davis waived his right to appeal his sentence on

any ground but reserved his right to appeal any punishment that

was imposed in excess of the statutory maximum or that

constituted an upward departure from the applicable guideline

range. Davis does not contend, nor does the record indicate,

that his sentence was in excess of the statutory maximum or the 
No. 99-30184

-2-

result of an upward departure. In addition, Davis does not

contend, nor does the record indicate, that the waiver of his

right to appeal was not valid. See United States v. Portillo, 18

F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994). His retained counsel, Stuart

Vess, failed to address the waiver in the appeal brief and failed

to file a reply brief in response to the Government’s assertion

of the waiver. We warn counsel that pursuing frivolous appeals

invites sanctions. See United States v. Gaitan, 171 F.3d 222,

224 (5th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, the instant appeal is barred by Davis’s waiver

of his right to appeal and is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.