alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 17351-8-III.

Division Three.

April 25, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jerry Munoz Duran, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Franklin County, No. 97-1-50180-5, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered March 6, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Kato, J.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated March 9, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of FTS International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of FTS International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-222892).

 

 
| /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
| Dallas, Texas          |   |
| March 9, 2018     |   |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6443
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE WEBB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00007-CMC) Submitted: May 22, 2008 D ecided: June 2, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Webb, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tyrone Webb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a reduction to his sentence based on an amendment to the sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. See United States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court.”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1748

JAMES BEGGS; JOYCE BEGGS , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY; CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY U.S. INC. , Defendants

- Appellees,
and
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, d/b/a Assurant, et al.,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv - 00110

- AWA

- DEM )

Submitted : June 29, 2022 Decided: June 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Beggs , Joyce Beggs , Appellants Pro Se. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: James and Joyce Beggs (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order denying their postjudgment motion for reconsideration. Limiting our review to the issues raised in Appellan ts’ informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014), w e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Beggs v. Am. Banker Ins. Co. , No. 4:17

- cv - 0011 0

- AWA

- DEM (E.D. Va. June 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as the Principal Executive Officer of ZaZa Energy Corporation (the “Company”), that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)), as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   Todd A. Brooks                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Todd   A. Brooks                        |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer)         |   |

 

 

Date: April 10, 2015

 

----
<PAGE>




                                   EXHIBIT 4.6


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO

                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated November
25, 2003 (the "First Amendment"), is by and among Neal So (the "Consultant"),
and Reality Wireless Networks, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Client").


                                    RECITALS

         A. The Consultant and the Client entered into a Consulting Services
Agreement dated September 25, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which the Consultant agreed to provide
certain consulting services to the Client.

         B. Client and Consultant wish to amend Sections 2 and 6(a) of the
Agreement to extend the duration of the Agreement and provide for additional
consideration in exchange for additional consulting services.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and the mutual
agreements, representations, warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.       Section 2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
         shall read as follows:

2.       Consideration.

         Client agrees to pay Consultant, as his fee and as consideration for
services provided, 470,000 shares of common stock of the Client. By amendment
dated November 25, 2003, Client agrees to pay Consultant an additional 2,500,000
shares of common stock of the Client."

B. Section 6(a) of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and shall read
as follows:


(a) Term.

This Agreement shall become effective on the date appearing next to the
signatures below and terminate twelve (12) months thereafter. Unless otherwise
agreed upon in writing by Consultant and Client, this Agreement shall not
automatically be renewed beyond its Term."


EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                       16
<PAGE>

                                            CLIENT:

                                            REALITY WIRELESS NETWORKS, INC.




                                            By : _________________________
                                            Victor Romero - President



                                            CONSULTANT:



                                            By:
                                                -------------------------------
                                            Name: Neal So


                                       17

<PAGE>
#### ELIZABETH WESTPHAL v. LAWRENCE A. GUARINO, M.D.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 

Vol. 75, No. 175, Friday, September 10, 2010, page 55312.

# Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 

10 a.m.-11 a.m., Wednesday September 15, 2010.

# Changes in Meeting: 

Meeting postponed to September 22, 2010, 10 a.m.-11 a.m. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for Additional Information: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: September 14, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23276 Filed 9-14-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 5, 2017

t0928

Order 

Clerk

October 5, 2017

155116

TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT and TAYLOR

FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFT LOCAL

1085,

Respondents-Appellants,

v SC: 155116

COA: 326128 

MERC: 13-000133, 13-000029

NANCY RHATIGAN, REBECCA METZ, and

ANGELA STEFFKE,

Charging Parties-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., would grant leave to appeal.
[No. 43807-7-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### Lance Nikolaisen, et al., *Appellants,*v. Simpson Timber Company, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-16929-1, Richard D. Eadie, J., entered November 13, 1998. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Coleman and Webster, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Meganet Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Saul Backal, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  October 23, 2015





/s/Saul Backal


Saul Backal


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DERRICK LEE LYONS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MULTNOMAH COUNTY; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-35849 

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01793-YY 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2018**

Portland, Oregon

Before: TALLMAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BOUGH,*** District Judge.

Derrick Lyons appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate 

judge’s finding and recommendation and granting summary judgment for 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

FILED

NOV 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-35849 

Defendants on Lyons’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim of inadequate medical care while 

he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction over Lyons’s appeal under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Fair 

Hous. Council of Riverside Cty., Inc. v. Riverside Two, 249 F.3d 1132, 1135 (9th 

Cir. 2001). Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no genuine dispute as 

to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). In making this determination, courts view all facts and 

reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving 

party. Davis v. United States, 854 F.3d 594, 598 (9th Cir. 2017). This Court may 

affirm the district court on any ground supported by the record. Experian Info. 

Sols., Inc. v. Nationwide Mktg. Servs. Inc., 893 F.3d 1176, 1187 (9th Cir. 2018). 

Here, although the district court did not have the benefit of Gordon v. 

County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2018), there is sufficient evidence in 

the record to affirm the district court. The record shows no objective deliberate 

indifference by Defendants in response to Lyons’s dental issue given the frequency 

of medical appointments and the lack of any evidence that it was a dental 

emergency. See id. at 1124–25. Therefore, nothing in the record gives rise to a 

genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Defendants’ conduct was objectively 

unreasonable. 
3 17-35849 

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

Promissory Note

 

Contracting party: Success Holding Group Corp. USA._

(hereinafter referred to as Party A)

 

Celebritv Enterorise Co. Ltd.

(hereinafter referred to as Party B)

 

WHEREAS both parties issue the Promissory Note follow by the loan’s terms & condition:

 

I. Party A is agree to loan Five Hundred Thousand dollars to Party B a t the time to issue this covenant.

 

II. The covenant is Interest-free from August 28th, 2014 to August 27th, 2016 end.

 

III. Part B shall start the payment of 42,000 dollars from 2015 on the 30th of every month until paid off the loan.

 

IIII. The period fails to repay, Party B will pay an annual interest rate of 3% .

 

Contracting Party A: Success Holding Group Corp. USA

 

Loaner Signature:

Date: August 28th, 2014

 

Contracting Party B: Celebrity Enterprise Co. Ltd.

 

Borrower Signature:

Date: August 28th, 2014
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E987-E988]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 CONGRATULATIONS ADAMSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL

                                 ______

                             HON. ED BRYANT

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 10, 1995
  Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate 
the Adamsville High School Cardinals for the outstanding 1994-95 
basketball season they enjoyed.
  It gives me great pleasure to pay tribute to one of the outstanding 
high schools in the State of Tennessee, and at this time, to specially 
recognize their runner-up status in the Tennessee State Basketball 
Tournament in Mufreesboro, TN.
  Head Coach Greg Martin, in his first year in that capacity, directed 
the team, with the able assistance of Assistant Coach Rick Coffman. 
Coach Martin won the District 15A Coach of the Year Award for his 
outstanding effort.
  At a time when some question the commitment and work ethic of our 
youth, those 15 young men dispelled that myth with their team efforts. 
Led by All-State Tournament Team member Matt Hoover, the Cardinals also 
included Michael Cleary, Tony Engle, Jon Luna, Casey Meek, B.J. 
Sherron, Chad Wyatt, Tracy 
[[Page E988]] Carter, Nick Ernest, John Hoover, Luke Rogers, Dexter 
Chambers, John Massey, Steven Moore, and George Root.
  Also to be commended for this outstanding year are the school 
principal, Mark Massey; athletic director, Fred Carroll; and 
cheerleaders Christy Carroll, Stephanie Gibbs, Dana James, Brook 
Garner, Keesha Bromley, and Tracey Harris.
  Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all members join me in paying tribute 
to the Adamsville High School basketball team as it celebrates another 
outstanding season and such fine leadership and all-around young men.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4902]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURE

  (Mr. TATE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. TATE. Mr. Speaker, within a decade, entitlements and interest 
will consume the entire national debt, and the President has presented 
no balanced budget, and the Clinton Democrats across the aisle have 
continued the status quo.
  The Republicans have announced a plan to balance the budget and to 
protect our children's future, and the Democrats have announced 
yesterday that they have no plan.
  Well, let me tell you, folks, here is their plan. Right here is what 
they do on Medicare to save it. Right down here is what they do to 
protect our children. Right down here is what they do to provide tax 
relief for working families.
  Folks, there is no plan. That is the fact. The Republicans have a 
plan, a plan to balance the budget, protect our children's future and 
to protect, preserve, and improve Medicare.
  The Republicans are willing to stand up to the plate and be counted 
and protect our future. The Democrats have their plan right here.
  Take a look.

                          ____________________
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2017

d0906

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2017

154656

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154656

COA: 325530

Saginaw CC: 14-039757-FC

TERRANCE DEMON-JORDAN THOMAS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of May 31, 2017, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals. 

On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to 

appeal is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People v 

Chatman (Docket No. 155184) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force takes three DOD environmental awardsPublished April 20, 2018
                        
                        By Shannon Carabajal
                        
                        
                        AFIMSC Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force took home three top honors in the 2018 Secretary of Defense environmental awards program. 
“Congratulations to the winners of the 2018 Secretary of Defense Environmental Awards. The winners' achievements reflect the department's commitment to protect national security by supporting U.S. military forces through dynamic environmental stewardship that increases military readiness and enhances efficiencies,” said Ellen Lord, undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, in an announcement April 16, 2018. 
The Defense Department selected the following Air Force winners:
Environmental Quality, Team/Individual: Frederick Javier, 1st Special Operations Civil Engineer Squadron, Hurlburt Field, Florida. Javier provided outstanding leadership by training installation staff on environmental management and engaging with the local community to promote DoD mission and science education. 
Environmental Excellence in Weapon System Acquisition, Large Program: Combat Rescue Helicopter Program Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Team, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. The team implemented programs to eliminate or reduce exposure to hazardous materials like hexavalent chromium. 
Environmental Restoration, Installation: Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. The installation completed a ten year performance-based restoration initiative resulting in response complete or site closure for 44 environmental restoration sites ahead of schedule, and maintained accelerated or on-time closure for 55 additional sites. 
The awards, established in 1962, honor individuals, teams, and installations for their outstanding achievements and innovative environmental practices, according to the award program website. They promote the use of secure and renewable energy sources; development and implementation of innovative technologies that eliminate waste; reclamation of key water resources; and protection of our nation’s irreplaceable natural and cultural heritage.
For more information, visit https://www.denix.osd.mil/awards/2018secdef/.environmental 



Defense Department 



DOD 



awards 



Air Force Civil Engineering Center 



AFCEC 



Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center 



AFIMSC 



secretary of defense 



SecDEF 



1st Special Operations Civil Engineer Squadron 



Hurlburt Field 



Combat Rescue Helicopter Program 



Wright Patterson AFB 



Vandenberg AFB 



Air Force 



AF 



Air Force Base 



JB San Antonio-Lackland Related Links
        2018 Secretary of Defense Environmental Awards
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 6, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00637

- CR

Jeffrey THEISEN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial Distri ct Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR2446 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed on May 5, 2014. The State’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to June 4, 2014. On June 5, 2014, the State filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until July 3, 2014, for a total extension of sixty days. The motion is GRANTED. THIS IS THE

FINAL EXTENSION OF T IME THAT THE STATE WILL BE GRANTED . The State’s brief must be filed by July 3, 2014

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Just ice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court