alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AMC commander releases ‘strategy to win’ 

              - Published  April 4, 2022
              -                             By   Air Mobility Command Public Affairs                                                    

**SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill. (AFNS) --  **
**Gen. Mike Minihan**, commander of **Air Mobility Command**, announced March 29 his “strategy to win” to more than 260 total force Mobility Air Forces leaders during the Spring Phoenix Rally at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. The rally was held March 29-31.In conjunction with releasing his strategy and priorities, Minihan engaged leadership in discussing force resiliency and how to work together to ensure the MAF is prepared to deliver rapid global mobility in a peer-competitor fight.“Warrior culture is required to make this strategy possible ... unleashing and empowering incredible Airmen and families biased toward action, unencumbered by bureaucracy, and intentionally disruptive to the status quo,” Minihan said. “We will tolerate nothing less.”Minihan outlined his four fundamental vectors within the strategy as Develop Ready Airmen and Families, Advance Warfighting Capabilities, Project and Connect the Joint Force, and Ensure Strategic Advantage.“I need you bothered, like me, to work harder, move faster, and passionately enable our operational wings to make our missions and people more successful,” Minihan said.Additionally, Minihan described three specific ways AMC will move forward with what he referred to as “a foundation of unrepentant lethality.”AMC will hone its tactics, techniques and procedures to make best use of its current force.AMC will extract maximum value out of existing capabilities and rapidly field them to further strengthen its force.AMC will develop the decisive mobility force of the future unbound by traditional structures, approaches and technologies to dominate any enemy.The strategy identified a victorious end state as one in which mobility forces can communicate, navigate and maneuver at the tempo required to win inside the Indo-Pacific area of operations and anywhere else.Minihan emphasized that AMC Airmen must project, maneuver, connect, and sustain the Joint Force with an unrelenting drive to accelerate winning results now and in the future.“Let me be crystal clear: Victory will be delivered on the shoulders of Mobility Airmen, and victory starts now,” Minihan said. “I am honored to serve beside you. Bring your courage. Let’s go!”For the complete Air Mobility Command Strategy, click **here**.

FSUSAFAFAir ForceAMCAir Mobility CommandGen. Mike Minihanstrategy to winleadershipresiliencyglobal mobilitywarrior culturereadinessTomorrow’s Air ForceMacDill AFBScott AFB
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6802]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. SIMON (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. 
             Bryan, Mr. Brown, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Mack, Mr. Graham, 
             Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Robb):
       S. 811. A bill to authorize research into the 
     desalinization and reclamation of water and authorize a 
     program for States, cities, or qualifying agencies desiring 
     to own and operate a water desalinization or reclamation 
     facility to develop such facilities, and for other purposes; 
     to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
           By Mr. THURMOND:
       S. 812. A bill to establish the South Carolina National 
     Heritage Corridor, and for other purposes; to the Committee 
     on Energy and Natural Resources.
           By Mr. MURKOWSKI:
       S. 813. A bill to amend the Pennsylvania Avenue Development 
     Corporation Act of 1972 to authorize appropriations for 
     implementation of the development plan for Pennsylvania 
     Avenue between the Capitol and the White House, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
           By Mr. McCAIN (for himself, Mr. Inouye, and Mr. 
             Domenici):
       S. 814. A bill to provide for the reorganization of the 
     Bureau of Indian Affairs, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Indian Affairs.
           By Mr. HATCH:
       S. 815. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to simplify the assessment and collection of the excise tax 
     on arrows; to the Committee on Finance.
           By Mr. DeWINE (for himself, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Ashcroft, 
             Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Thurmond):
       S. 816. A bill to provide equal protection for victims of 
     crime, to facilitate the exchange of information between 
     Federal and State law enforcement and investigation entities, 
     to reform criminal procedure, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
     

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 First B-1Bs resume flight operationsPublished May 7, 2021
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                The first**B-1B Lancers** resumed flight operations May 3 following a safety stand-down issued April 20 by **Gen. Tim Ray**, **Air Force Global Strike Command** commander. Individual B-1B aircraft will return to flight as inspections and maintenance directed during the stand-down are completed on each aircraft.During the stand-down, maintenance depot personnel disassembled the Augmenter Fuel Filter Housing and performed a series of inspections. After each unit was determined to be free of defects, it was reassembled, pressure checked and returned to service.“We are proud of the tremendous efforts of our maintainers and B-1 partners in identifying, inspecting, and remediating any potential issues with the B-1B fuel filter housing,” said**Maj. Gen. Mark Weatherington**, **Eighth Air Force** commander, who is responsible for the Air Force bomber force. “The aircraft are still safe to fly and we are confident that this stand-down has resulted in increased safety within the B-1B fleet.”The entire maintenance, depot, engineering and acquisition team must be commended for getting the B-1B bombers back into the hands of warfighters in a very short time, according to AFGSC officials. Although this was an Air Force enterprise-wide effort, special thanks must go to the maintainers at**Ellsworth Air Force Base**, S.D., **Dyess AFB**, Texas and the AFGSC staff, as well as Air Force Sustainment Center’s depot team, **Air Force Life Cycle Management Center**’s B-1 Program Office and Propulsion Directorate, the Air Staff and the Secretary of the Air Force office of Acquisitions, Technology and Logistics on their efforts.The precautionary safety stand-down and holistic inspection of the Augmenter Fuel Filter Housing on each aircraft was ordered after an April 8 ground emergency resulted in the discovery of a discrepancy with the system.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



B-1 Bomber 



AFGSC 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



bombers 



Dyess AFB 



Ellsworth AFB 



safety 



stand-down 



Augmenter Fuel Filter Housing 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center
Exhibit 21.1  Wellness Center USA, Inc. List of Subsidiaries


|                                          |                                                  |                                                            |                      
|----------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|Name of Subsidiary or
Consolidated Entity | Place of Formation/
Incorporation (Jurisdiction) | Date of Incorporation
(Date of Acquisition, if
Applicable) | Attributable Interest
|                                          |                                                  |                                                            |                      
|CNS Wellness Florida, LLC                 | The State of Florida                             | May 26, 2009
(August 2, 2012)                              | 100%                 
|                                          |                                                  |                                                            |                      
|Psoria-Shield Inc.                        | The State of Florida                             | June 17, 2012
(August 24, 2012)                            | 100%
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# B-52s arrive at Andersen AFB for Bomber Task Force deployment

              - Published  Feb. 1, 2021
              -                             By 1st Lt. Denise C. Guiao-Corpuz                                                    
              - Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

**ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (AFNS) --  **
**Four U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortress returned to the Indo-Pacific region Jan. 28 for a Bomber Task Force deployment, conducting operations out of Andersen Air Force Base.**

****The bombers, from the 96th Bomb Squadron at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, deployed in support of Pacific Air Forces’ training efforts with allies, partners and joint forces. These strategic-deterrence missions reinforce the rules-based international order in the Indo-Pacific region.****

******“Deploying as a Bomber Task Force exercises our ability to produce agile, combat power in any location we are needed,” said Lt. Col. Christopher Duff, 96th Bomb Squadron commander. “Our strategic bomber missions demonstrate our always-ready global strike capability. We remain ready to deploy to reach anywhere in the world at any time.”******

******U.S. Strategic Command units regularly conduct training with and in support of the geographic combatant commands. USSTRATCOM Bomber Task Force missions help maintain global stability and security while enabling units to become familiar with operations in different regions.******

******“Bomber Task Force deployments also provide our Airmen opportunities to train and work with our allies and partners in realistic, joint coalition operations and exercises,” said Duff. “It ensures that we continue to maintain the highest level of proficiency and readiness.”******

******Strategic bomber missions validate the credibility of our forces to address a diverse and complex global security environment.******

******Airmen and B-52H Stratofortress bombers last deployed from Barksdale AFB to Guam in December 2018 in support of BTF operations.******

FSUSAFAFAir ForceAndersen AFBB-52H StratofortressBarksdale AFBBomber Task ForceU.S. Strategic CommandUSSTRATCOM
#### F. H. Wagner v. F. G. Edmiston.

(No. 309, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 215.)

Appeal from Houston County.

February 9, 1878.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 678. *Petition for injunction cannot be dismissed in vacation.*Under the authority of Price v. Bland, 44 Tex. 145, which is a case directly in point, the appeal in this case must be dismissed. The court in chambers in vacation dissolved the injunction upon answer and notice given to the complainants, and then dismissed the petition, and there is nothing in the record showing that this action of the judge in chambers was subsequently sanctioned by the court in term time, by a judgment disposing of the case. The statute does not permit the petition to be dismissed upon the dissolution of the injunction in chambers in vacation, as was done in this case. [Pas. Dig. art. 3934.] “The judgment purporting to dismiss the petition was to that extent without lawful authority, and cannot be regarded as a final judgment disposing of the case, from which an appeal or writ of error can be taken to this court.” [44 Tex. 145; Grant v. Chambers, 34 Tex. 573; Aiken v. Carroll, 37 Tex. 73; Coleman v. Goyne, 37 Tex. 522.]

Dismissed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 383 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of Illabot 

Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2013 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

4 SEGMENTS. 

5 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(208) ILLABOT CREEK, WASHINGTON.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 383 IS

1 ‘‘(A) The 14.3-mile segment from the 

2 headwaters of Illabot Creek to the northern ter3 minus as generally depicted on the map titled 

4 ‘Illabot Creek Proposed WSR–Northern Ter5 minus’, dated September 15, 2009, to be ad6 ministered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 

7 follows: 

8 ‘‘(i) The 4.3-mile segment from the 

9 headwaters of Illabot Creek to the bound10 ary of Glacier Peak Wilderness Area as a 

11 wild river. 

12 ‘‘(ii) The 10-mile segment from the 

13 boundary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to 

14 the northern terminus as generally de15 picted on the map titled ‘Illabot Creek 

16 Proposed WSR–Northern Terminus’, dated 

17 September 15, 2009, as a recreational 

18 river. 

19 ‘‘(B) Action required to be taken under 

20 subsection (d)(1) for the river segments des21 ignated under this paragraph shall be com22 pleted through revision of the Skagit Wild and 

23 Scenic River comprehensive management 

24 plan.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Howard University Partnership, OHA Survey, Domestic Violence ReviewPublished Feb. 3, 2023
                        
                        By SSgt Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week’s look around the Air Force includes the announcement of the first Department of the Air Force research partnership with Howard University, the Overseas Housing Allowance Survey is in full swing, and the Secretary of the Air Force orders a 90-day review of support for victims of domestic violence. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann)





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- US Air Force selects Howard University for science research partnership****- OHA survey open now****- Department of the Air Force review to improve domestic violence support to victims**SecDEF 



SecAF 



CSAF 



HBCU 



Howard University 



housing 



readiness 



domestic violence 



family advocacy
#### T. B. Bolls v. W. *J.*Galloway.

(No. 400, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 492.)

Appeal from Polk County.

February 8, 1879.

Opinion by

Ector, J.

§ 7 2 4. *Motion for new trial; ignorance of lime of holding court no ground for.*It is no ground for a new trial that a defendant in a suit did not know on what day of the term or what term of the court his cause would be called for trial. A failure of a party or his attorney, through their own ignorance of the statutory time of holding court, to attend a trial, is not a good ground. for a new trial.

§ 725. *Motion for neto trial because the party was misled by the statement of his adversary’s attorney.*The statements in Bolls’ affidavit as to what was said and done by plaintiff’s attorney which induced defendant to believe that the case would not be tried until the February term of court, are altogether too indefinite. Applications for new trial on the ground set out in the motion are addressed to the sound discretion of the court. And the manner in which the court has exercised it will not be revised by the appellate tribunal unless it clearly appears that the discretion has been abused.

Affirmed.
#### STATE EX REL. E. M. HELLNER v. ALBERT WUNDERLICH, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL AND ANOTHER.1

January 2, 1920.

No. 21,488.

Case followed.

Upon the application of relator the district court for Ramsey county grant ed its writ of alternative mandamus directing the commissioner of education of the city of St. Paul to reinstate relator in her position as teacher in the public schools of that city and to place relator’s name upon the payroll of the city, or show cauise why he had not done so. Respondents separately demurred to the petition and writ on the ground that they did not state facts sufficient to entitle relator to the relief demanded. From an order, Haupt, J., sustaining demurrers to the alternative writ of mandamus, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*J. P. Kyle,*for appellant.

*O. H. O'Neill*arid *W. J. Giber son,*for respondents.

1

 Reported in 175 N. W. 680.

Pee Cubiam.

This case in all substantial respects is similar to the case of State v. Wunderlich, supra, page 368, 175 N. W. 677, and the questions involved are disposed of by the opinion in that case.

Order affirmed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

d0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140499

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140499 COA: 279338 Wayne CC: 06-013758-01 SIRVAN RAYSHA MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 15, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5088]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                THE REPUBLICANS WILL BALANCE THE BUDGET

  (Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, the Democrats, scare-the-
people campaign about draconian cuts by Republicans is just ridiculous. 
The Republican budget actually increases spending by 3 percent every 
year for the next 7 years, spending nearly $12 trillion more in the 
next 7 years than in the past.
  When I was back in Dallas, my constituents put together three 
notebooks full of comments about ideas for reductions in Government 
spending. Do you know what they say? Balance the budget. So do not try 
to fool the American people into thinking that balancing the budget 
will hurt them. They know better. They know Government spends too much, 
and, most importantly, they know the consequences if we continue down 
the path that we are going on now.
  They will also know, after tomorrow, that it is the Republicans who 
have taken the first major step toward balancing our budget.

                          ____________________
```
Filed: March 23, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 98-6471(L) (CR-92-34, CA-97-209-P, CA-97-210-P) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Alton Ray Truesdale, et al, Defendants - Appellants.
ORDER The court amends its opinion filed September 8, 1998, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 4, line 3, and on page 2, text of opinion, line 7 -- case number “CA-97-209-P” is added to the lower court information. For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor ClerkUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6471 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALTON RAY TRUESDALE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 98-6472 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TENNISON ALEXANDER HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-34, CA-97-209-P, CA-97-210-P) Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: September 8, 19983 Before ERVIN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alton Ray Truesdale, Tennison Alexander Harris, Appellants Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Alton Ray Truesdale and Tennison Alexander Harris seek to appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewedthe records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Truesdale, No. CR-92-34; CA-97-209-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1998); United States v. Harris , Nos. CR-92-34; CA-97-210-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 11

                      ENGINEERED SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC.
               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                            January 31
                                                       ---------------------
                                                        2005          2004
                                                        ----          ----

NET INCOME                                             $20,611       $15,743
                                                       =======       =======

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Average basic shares outstanding                     26,827        25,066
                                                       =======       =======

   Basic earnings per share                            $  0.77       $  0.63
                                                       =======       =======

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Average basic shares outstanding                     26,827        25,066
   Net effect of dilutive stock options (1)              1,521         2,486
                                                       -------       -------
          Total                                         28,348        27,552
                                                       =======       =======

   Diluted earnings per share                          $  0.73       $  0.57
                                                       =======       =======

<FN>
(1) Based on the treasury stock method.