alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Force Health Protection Guidance (Supplement 23) - Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Attestation and Screening Testing for Unvaccinated PersonnelPublished Sept. 9, 2021
                        
                        
                        DOD News
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of Defense released Force Health Protection Guidance (Supplement 23) which provides guidance for implementing additional force health protection and workplace safety measures directed by the White House Safer Federal Workforce Task Force to reduce the transmission of the virus that causes the **coronavirus disease 2019** (COVID-19).
In accordance with the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force guidance, attestation of an individual's status as fully vaccinated or presentation of a recent negative COVID-19 test is a condition of physical access to DOD buildings and DOD-leased spaces in non-DOD buildings in which official DOD business takes place.
This guidance applies to all individuals issued a credential by DOD that affords the individual recurring access, classified herein as "credentialed recurring access" (CRA) (e.g., Common Access Cardholders), to DOD facilities, and to non-DOD individuals seeking access, one time or recurring, in association with the performance of official DOD business. Regardless of whether an individual is authorized to telework or perform remote work, all DOD civilian employees and DOD contractor personnel with CRA must attest to their vaccination status by completing DD Form 3150. Civilian employees and contractor personnel who are unvaccinated for COVID-19 or who decline to attest to their COVID-19 vaccination status will be subject to COVID-19 screening testing weekly. Such civilian employees and contractor personnel who refuse required screening testing will be denied access to DOD facilities.
Individuals other than visitors seeking access to facilities located on DOD installations but operated by other Federal Departments and Agencies will follow the policies and procedures of that other Department or Agency. Visitors will follow applicable policies and procedures of both DOD and the Department or Agency they are visiting.
View the **memorandum for Force Health Protection Guidance (Supplement 23) - Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Attestation and Screening Testing for Unvaccinated Personnel**.**DD Form 3150**, used for attestation of vaccination status, is included as an attachment in the memorandum.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



DOD 



Department of Defense 



COVID-19 



coronavirus 



health 



medical 



Force protection 



guidance 



vaccine 



attestation 



Screening 



testing
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6575]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Ogilvie, offered the following prayer:
  Let us pray:
  Lord God, You are infinite, eternal, unchangeable, and the source of 
wisdom, holiness, goodness, and truth. Today we want to hold together 
two Biblical admonitions. We are told that the fear of the Lord is the 
beginning of wisdom but also that we are not to fear. Help us to 
distinguish between the humble awe and wonder that opens us to the gift 
of Your guidance, and the negative panic that so often grips our souls.
  Give us a profound reverence in Your presence that keeps us on the 
knees of our hearts. May we never presume that we are adequate for a 
day's challenges until we have received Your strength and vision. Give 
us the confidence that comes from trust in Your reliability and 
resourcefulness. You never let us down and constantly lift us up.
  Lord, liberate us from all minor fears that haunt us: the fear of 
hidden memories, the fear of imagined failure, and the fear of what is 
ahead. We may not know what the future holds, but we do know that You 
hold the future. In the name of Him whose constant watchword is ``Fear 
not, I am with you!'' Amen.

                          ____________________
```
No. 87-6204.

#### Milton *v.*World Savings & Loan Assn.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-34.2


(logo) pwc






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:




We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on


Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland


Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the


"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of


the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial


mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,


2011 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),


1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),


1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has


determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with


respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance


with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on


management's assertion based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the


Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,


included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance


with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as


we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing


of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the


Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and


determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and


performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing


criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and


servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this


report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from


errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have


affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during


the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a


reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal


determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland Loan Services complied with


the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended


December 31, 2011 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




February 24, 2012






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106


T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Mark Engler hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of PureSnax International, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PureSnax International, Inc.   Dated: October 12, 2017/s/ Mark EnglerMark EnglerCFO and Director(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)PureSnax International, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PureSnax International, Inc. and will be retained by PureSnax International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
10-K





Exhibit 32.1


March 22, 2019


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:


(1)    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Sarah C. NewellSarah C. NewellVice President
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Optimize aviation fuel? The Air Force wants your ideas

              - Published  July 13, 2020
              -                             By Air Force Operational Energy                                                    

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
In partnership with **AFWERX**, **Air Force Operational Energy** has launched an Airmen Powered by Innovation Challenge to solicit ideas on how to optimize aviation fuel for the Air Force, enabling greater combat capability, range and more efficient operations. The challenge, which is open to Airmen of all ranks and occupations, is accepting submissions on a rolling basis. Each submission will be carefully reviewed by subject matter experts to determine the possibility of Air Force buy-in and implementation, based on associated costs, benefits, challenges and potential risks. After selecting an idea, Air Force Operational Energy will work with AFWERX to source funding and develop an execution plan. Airmen are also encouraged to vote for their favorite submission through the online portal.

Submissions can focus on a number of areas to optimize aviation fuel use including (but not limited to):
            - Energy and logistics risk mitigation
            - Drag reduction devices on aircraft
            - Lighter weight aircraft parts
            - Streamlined flight plans during training
            - 21st century technologies and software
            - Engine sustainment processes
            - Optimized fuel loads
            - Efficient flight formations
            - Airmen education and training

To learn more about the challenge visit **www.safie.hq.af.mil/APIChallenge** or apply directly to the Ideascale website **https://usaf.ideascalegov.com** (CAC-enabled) by clicking on ‘Command and Wing’ and searching for the Operational Energy challenge. Users must set up an Ideascale account to participate.

FSUSAFAFAir ForceSAFAirmen Powered by InnovationchallengeAFwerXAir Force Operational Energyaviation fuelIdeaScale
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annaplois Rd.
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2011:


(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Certificate Administrator and of
its performance under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto
(the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period.


March 01, 2012

/s/ Judith J. Rishel
JUDITH RISHEL
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Rd.
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial
  Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series 2011-C3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
  Certificate Administrator.



Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gerald E. Daniels, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Engineered Support
    Systems, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
    statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
    such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
    covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
    cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
    this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
    defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
    registrant and have:

    a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

    b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such
        evaluation; and

    c.  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the
        registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
        affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
        registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
    on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
    reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee or
    registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
    functions):

    a.  all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2004

/s/ Gerald E. Daniels
-------------------------
Gerald E. Daniels
Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-84,742-01

EX P ARTE GUSTAVO MEDINA -YAN EZ, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 14-10-14889A IN THE 506TH DIST RICT COURT

F ROM WALLER COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d g uilty to driving while intox icated a

nd was sente nced to f

ive y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. In a single g round, Applicant contends that trial counsel led him to believe that his sentenc e would not be ag g ravated. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 2942

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a h ea ring , it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Appl i ca n t is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent him at the hea ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and co n cl u s i ons of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was defic ient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleg ed defic ient conduct. The trial court shall als o m ak e an y o t her finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems re levant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr i p t co n t ai n ing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order

. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Apr il 13, 2016 Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6222

KEITH WILLIAM DEBLASIO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-1872-AM)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: June 22, 1998

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith William DeBlasio, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith William DeBlasio seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. DeBlasio v. Virginia, No. CA-97-

1872-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1998). We also deny DeBlasio’s motions

for appointment of counsel and to supplement the record on appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[No. 23533-1-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### KK & LL Corp., et al., *Appellants,*v. Alamo Group, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 96-2-01431-2, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered June 12, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Morgan, J.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6687-S6688]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. COCHRAN:
       S. 800. A bill to provide for hearing care services by 
     audiologists to Federal civilian employees; to the Committee 
     on Governmental Affairs.
           By Mr. HELMS:
       S. 801. A bill to extend the deadline under the Federal 
     Power Act applicable to the construction of two hydroelectric 
     projects in North Carolina, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
           By Mr. HOLLINGS:
       S. 802. A bill to authorize the Secretary of Transportation 
     to issue a certificate of documentation and coastwise trade 
     endorsement for the vessel ROYAL AFFAIRE; to the Committee on 
     Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
           By Mr. McCAIN:
       S. 803. A bill to amend the Defense Base Closure and 
     Realignment Act of 1990 in order to revise the process for 
     disposal of property located at installations closed under 
     that Act pursuant to the 1995 base closure round; to the 
     Committee on Armed Services.
           By Mr. BRADLEY:
       S. 804. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to increase the excise taxes on tobacco products, and to use 
     a portion of the resulting revenues to fund a trust fund for 
     tobacco diversification, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Finance.
     [[Page S6688]]
     
           By Mr. SIMPSON:
       S. 805. A bill to improve the rural electrification 
     programs under the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, to 
     improve Federal rural development programs administered by 
     the Department of Agriculture, to provide for exclusive State 
     jurisdiction over retail electric service areas, to prohibit 
     certain practices in the restraint of trade, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
     Forestry.
     

                          ____________________
```