56136 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[WY–923–1310–FI; WYW149954] 

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of 

Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 

WYW149954, Wyoming 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 

amended, the Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) received a petition 

for reinstatement from Chesapeake 

Exploration LLC and Khody Land & 

Minerals Company for competitive oil 

and gas lease WYW149954 for land in 

Converse County, Wyoming. The 

petition was filed on time and was 

accompanied by all the rentals due 

since the date the lease terminated 

under the law. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 

Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals 

Adjudication, at (307) 775–6176. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

lessees have agreed to the amended 

lease terms for rentals and royalties at 

rates of $10 per acre, or fraction thereof, 

per year and 162⁄3 percent, respectively. 

The lessees have paid the required $500 

administrative fee and $163 to 

reimburse the Department for the cost of 

this Federal Register notice. The lessees 

have met all the requirements for 

reinstatement of the lease as set out in 

Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral 

Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 

188), and the BLM is proposing to 

reinstate lease WYW149954 effective 

April 1, 2010, under the original terms 

and conditions of the lease and the 

increased rental and royalty rates cited 

above. The BLM has not issued a valid 

lease to any other interest affecting the 

lands. 

Julie L. Weaver, 

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22955 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–22–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–698] 

Notice of Commission Decision Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation; In the 

Matter of Certain DC-DC Controllers 

and Products Containing Same 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 56) granting a joint motion 

to terminate the investigation as to one 

respondent and terminating the 

investigation in its entirety. The 

Commission has issued the subject 

consent order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2532. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 29, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by Richtek Technology 

Corp. (Taiwan) and Richtek USA, Inc. 

(San Jose, California) (collectively 

‘‘Richtek’’), alleging a violation of 

section 337 in the importation, sale for 

importation, and sale within the United 

States after importation of certain 

DC–DC controllers by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,315,190; 6,414,470; and 

7,132,717; and by reason of trade secret 

misappropriation. 75 FR 446 (Jan. 5, 

2010). The complaint, as amended, 

named eight respondents: uPI 

Semiconductor Corp. (Taiwan) (‘‘uPI’’); 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

(Sunnyvale, California) (‘‘AMD’’); 

Sapphire Technology Ltd. (Hong Kong) 

(‘‘Sapphire’’); Best Data Products d/b/a 

Diamond Multimedia (Chatsworth, 

California) (‘‘Diamond’’); Eastcom, Inc. 

d/b/a XFX Technology USA (Rowland 

Heights, California) (‘‘XFX’’); Micro-Star 

International Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) and MSI 

Computer Corp. (City of Industry, 

California) (collectively, ‘‘MSI’’); and 

VisionTek Products LLC (Inverness, 

Illinois) (‘‘VisionTek’’). See Second Am. 

Compl. ¶¶ 12–34 (May 20, 2010). 

The investigation has been terminated 

by settlement agreement or consent 

order against all parties other than 

VisionTek: On July 12, 2010, the 

Commission determined not to review 

the ALJ’s termination of the 

investigation as against AMD, Diamond, 

and XFX. On August 13, 2010, the 

Commission determined not to review 

the ALJ’s termination of the 

investigation against uPI and Sapphire. 

On August 20, 2010, the Commission 

determined not to review the ALJ’s 

termination of the investigation against 

the MSI respondents. On July 27, 2010, 

VisionTek and Richtek jointly moved to 

terminate the investigation based on a 

consent order stipulation and proposed 

consent order. The ALJ denied the 

motion. Order No. 51 (July 29, 2010). On 

August 5, 2010, VisionTek and Richtek 

jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. On August 17, 2010, the ALJ 

granted the motion. Order No. 56. 

Because VisionTek is the last 

respondent, termination against 

VisionTek results in termination of the 

investigation. 

No petitions for review of the ID were 

filed. The Commission has determined 

not to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.21(b) and 210.42 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b), 210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 9, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22957 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES