alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54661-54662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/06-0326]


Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP; Notice of Exemption Under Section 
312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP, 1300 
Post Oak Blvd, Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, a Federal Licensee under 
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern,

[[Page 54662]]

has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 
107.730 of the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') Rules and 
Regulations (13 CFR 107.730), Financings which Constitute Conflicts of 
Interest. Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP provided a debt/equity 
financing to National Trench Safety, LLC, 15955 West Hardy Road, 
Houston, TX 77060. The financing was made to support the growth and 
development of the company.
    The financing is brought within the purview of section 
107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Main Street Equity Interests, 
Inc. an Associate of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP, owns more than ten 
percent of National Trench Safety, LLC.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator of 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2010-22293 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4676-H4677]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     REFORM THE MINING LAW OF 1872

  (Mr. RAHALL asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, 123 years ago today, President Grant signed 
into law a bill aimed at promoting the settlement of the Western 
States. This bill allowed folks to mine valuable minerals such as gold 
and silver from Federal lands in those States for free. It also allowed 
people to obtain title to these lands for $2.50 an acre. In one sense, 
the mining law of 1872 served much the same purpose as the Homestead 
Act.
  Today, the Homestead Act has long since been repealed. The West is 
well settled. Yet, the mining law of 1872 survives intact, in this age 
of skyrocketing Federal budget deficits still allowing the wholesale 
giveaway of valuable Federal lands and minerals. It is incredible, but 
true, that annually under this law the United States allows about 1.8 
billion dollars' worth of gold and silver to be mined for absolutely 
free.
  And for the most part, these minerals are not being mined by the lone 
prospector of old, but rather, by multinational corporations who reap 
the benefits of this last great giveaway of American natural resources.
  What a shame. What a shame, Congress, to allow lands, owned by every 
American, to be given away for fast food hamburger prices. To allow 
billions of dollars worth of the public wealth to be produced for free 
by corporations based in Luxembourg, Toronto, and London.
  [[Page H4677]] Well, happy birthday mining law of 1872. But may I 
say, I hope there will not be any more such birthdays left to you. My 
colleagues, please join me and 83 other Members of this body in seeking 
to reform the mining law of 1872; cosponsor H.R. 357 today.

                          ____________________
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 292 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide a special rule 

for the period of admission of H–2A nonimmigrants employed as sheepherders, goat herders, or dairy farmers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

a special rule for the period of admission of H–2A nonimmigrants employed as sheepherders, goat herders, or 

dairy farmers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dairy and Sheep H– 

5 2A Act’’ or the ‘‘DASH Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 292 IS

1 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT STATUS FOR DAIRY WORKERS, 

2 SHEEPHERDERS, AND GOAT HERDERS. 

3 Section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and 

4 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘or who is coming temporarily to 

6 the United States to perform agricultural labor or services 

7 as a sheepherder, goat herder, or dairy worker,’’ after ‘‘of 

8 a temporary or seasonal nature,’’. 

9 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULE FOR PERIOD OF ADMISSION OF H–2A 

10 NONIMMIGRANTS EMPLOYED AS SHEEP11 HERDERS, GOAT HERDERS, OR DAIRY WORK12 ERS. 

13 Section 218(h) of the Immigration and Nationality 

14 Act (8 U.S.C. 1188(h)) is amended by adding at the end 

15 of the following: 

16 ‘‘(3) In the case of an alien admitted as an H– 

17 2A worker for employment as a sheepherder, goat 

18 herder, or dairy worker— 

19 ‘‘(A) the initial period of admission shall 

20 be for a period of 3 years; 

21 ‘‘(B) the period of admission may be ex22 tended for additional periods of 3 years; and 

23 ‘‘(C) no period of absence from the United 

24 States may be required as a condition of ap25 proval of an extension under subparagraph 

26 (B).’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 292 IS

1 SEC. 4. PROVISIONS BY THE SECRETARY OF LABOR. 

2 The Secretary of Labor shall issue regulations that 

3 address the specific requirements for the provision of 

4 housing to sheepherders, goat herders, and dairy workers. 

5 SEC. 5. SAVINGS PROVISION. 

6 Nothing in section 218 of the Immigration and Na7 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1188), as amended by this Act, 

8 may be construed to preclude the Secretary of Labor or 

9 the Secretary of Homeland Security from continuing to 

10 apply special procedures and requirements to the admis11 sion and employment of aliens in occupations involving the 

12 range production of livestock. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Karen F. Long, Plaintiff,


### v. StepenN. Zark, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED NOV - 42010 Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia 

# 10 1889

This matter is before the Court on its initial review ofplaintiffs pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed informapauperis. The Court will grant the informapauperis application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements ofRule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure and is frivolous. Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure requires complaints to contain "(1) a short and plain statement ofthe grounds for the court'sjurisdiction [and] (2) a short and plain statement ofthe claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); seeAshcroftv. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice ofthe claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense and determine whether the doctrine ofresjudicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).Plaintiff, a resident ofOxon Hill, Maryland, purports to sue the President ofthe American Bar Association but for what conduct is unknown. I The complaint, consisting ofincoherent scribble, fails to provide any notice ofa claim and is simply frivolous. 2 A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

I The President ofthe American Bar Association is StephenN. Zack. 

### See http://www.abanet.org.
2 This complaint is one offour such submissions received by the Clerk's Office on the same day. Each complaint names a different defendant. Plaintiff, whojustthis year has had nine cases dismissed under similar circumstances, is warned that her persistence in filing frivolous lawsuits may result in the Court imposing restrictions onher ability to file cases in this Court. 2
#### GLENVIEW DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP.

Jan. 7, 1980.

Petition for certification to Superior Court, Law Division granted.
EXHIBIT 13.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Thomas Degnan, the Chief Executive Officer of Reynolds Group Holdings Limited (the "Company"), certify that:





(a)    The annual report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)    The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas DegnanThomas DegnanChief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2017
EXHIBIT 10.1


AMENDMENT AGREEMENT


This amendment agreement dated
as of October 10, 2014 (the “Amendment Agreement”) is between YA GLOBAL MASTER SPV LTD., a Cayman
Islands exempt limited partnership (the “Investor”), and OMAGINE, INC., a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Company”). Each of the Investor and the Company are sometimes referred to herein
as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties".


This Amendment Agreement is an amendment
to that certain agreement between the Parties dated as of April 22, 2014 (the “2014 SEDA Agreement”). All capitalized
terms in this Amendment Agreement shall, unless otherwise indicated herein, have the meanings assigned to them in the 2014 SEDA
Agreement.


The Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


		1)	Clause (ii) of Section 10.02(c) of the 2014 SEDA Agreement is hereby deleted.



 


		2)	All other terms and conditions of the 2014 SEDA Agreement remain in full force and effect.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment Agreement
as of the date first above written.


 


	 	 
	 	 
	 	COMPANY:
	 	Omagine, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:/s/ Charles P. Kuczynski
	 	Name:  Charles P. Kuczynski
	 	Title: Vice-President
	 	
         

         

	 	INVESTOR:
	 	YA Global  Master SPV Ltd.
	 	By:Yorkville Advisors, LLC
	 	Its:Investment Manager
	 	 
	 	By:/s/ David Gonzalez
	 	Name:   David Gonzalez
	 	Title:   Managing Member & General Counsel
[No. 24408-0-II.

Division Two.

May 26, 2000.]

#### Gerald Hodgkiss, *Appellant,*v. Pierce County, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 97-2-02880-6, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered February 8, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Hunt, J.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Multi-capable Airmen train with US Marine Corps

              - Published  Jan. 26, 2022
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Vaughn Weber                                                    
              - 355th Wing Public Affairs

**DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --  **
Multi-capable Airmen training has expanded to Twentynine Palms, California, with a new opportunity to train alongside the **U.S. Marine Corps** in an operationally limited environment.

The joint training with the Marine Wing Support Squadron 374 was developed by the 357th Fighter Squadron and 79th Rescue Squadron to provide hands-on training at the largest U.S. Marine Corps base.

“Once a quarter, we are providing an opportunity for as many as 15 multi-capable Airmen to go on this mission and practice forward area refueling point operations and airfield security,” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Joel Bier, 357th FS commander. “We keep evolving this joint force training to have MCA accomplish mission objectives in an expeditionary environment.”

So far, this training has been conducted in October and December 2021, with trained MCA flying out on 79th RQS **HC-130J Combat King II** aircraft. At Twentynine Palms, MCA get the unique opportunity to work alongside Marines to secure the landing zone for 357th FS **A-10C Thunderbolt II**s and install the AM-2 airfield mat for the A-10s to land on.  

“We were able to learn similarities between (the branches) operational concepts,” said U.S. Marine Corps Chief Warrant Officer 2 Matthew Wilson, Marine Wing Support Squadron 374 airfield services officer. “Which will inform our current and future planners about the capabilities, skills and technical abilities of similar military occupation specialty types outside of the Marine Corps.”

Working alongside the U.S. Marine Corps’ airfield services officers and bulk fuel specialists, the 355th Wing’s MCA refine their skill set of conducting FARP operations and ensuring A-10s take off and land safely in austere locations. 

 “Overall I would say that we enjoy working with the U.S. Air Force during all types of training operations,” Wilson said. “I know for a fact that the Marines always enjoy seeing an A-10 in the pattern.”

LOEUSAFAFAir ForceDavis-Monthan AFBACCAir Combat CommandMarine CorpstrainingMulti-Capable AirmenTwentynine Palms
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, M.K. JAMISON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SHAWN P. DENGLER

AVIATION ELECTRICIAN'S MATE THIRD CLASS (E

- 4)

U .S. N A VY

NMCCA 201400064

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 5 November 2013

. **Military Judge:** CAPT Robert Blazewick, JAGC, USN

. **Convening Authority:** Commanding Officer, Fleet Readiness

Center Southeast, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation:**  LT C.M. Reintjes

,

JAGC, USN

. **For Appellant:** Maj Emmett S. Collazo, USMCR.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

**30 April 2014** 

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**------------- --------------------------------------** 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U .S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
News United States Air Force
 Final AC-130U Spooky returns from combat deploymentPublished July 18, 2019
                        
                        
                        1st Special Operations Wing Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                The final AC-130U Spooky gunship returned here from the airframe’s last scheduled combat deployment July 8, 2019.

While still on alert to respond to contingencies as needed for the next few months, the Spooky is being replaced downrange by the AC-130J Ghostrider, the most lethal and innovative gunship in the world.

“This begins the ending of an era for one of the most well-known aircraft in the special operations world, but it doesn’t mean our Air Commandos will be making any less of impact on the battlefield,” said U.S. Air Force Col. Michael Conley, commander of the 1st Special Operations Wing. “The Ghostrider is seamlessly taking the Spooky’s position downrange. There is no rest for our enemies, and our gunships will own the night for years to come.”

The AC-130J is the latest in a long line of gunships, offering the most advanced technology and weapons available to support special operations forces on the ground. The 73rd Special Operations Squadron here is currently the only operational AC-130J squadron.

The Ghostrider is also equipped with a Precision Strike Package, armed with precision-guided munitions delivery capabilities and trainable 30mm and 105mm weapons, a mission management console, robust communications suite, two electro-optical/infrared sensors, and advanced fire control equipment.

Aside from one previous, approximately six-month squadron reconstitution in 2013, AC-130U’s assigned to the 4th Special Operations Squadron have been constantly deployed in support of overseas contingencies since 2001, earning the unit the designation of “most deployed squadron in the Air Force” multiple times. The Spooky has spent nearly a quarter century in the operational field, seeing combat for the first time in 1995.AFWN 



AC-130U 



Spooky gunship 



AC-130J 



Ghostrider 



lethal gunship 



innovation 



1st Special Operations Wing 



1st SOW 



73rd Special Operations Squadron 



73rd SOS 



4th Special Operations Squadron 



4th sos 



Precision Strike Package 



Hurlburt Field 



Air Force Special Operations Command 



AFSOC 



AF 



Air Force
News United States Air Force
 Mobility Airmen transport medics, supplies to aid in fight against COVID-19Published April 9, 2020
                        
                        By  Tech. Sgt. James Hodgman
                        
                        
                        60th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs
                **TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Air Force Reserve mobility Airmen from California answered an urgent request April 5, deploying medical personnel to the state of New York to help combat **COVID-19**.
Within a few hours of notification, an aircrew from **March Air Reserve Base** took to the sky in a **C-17 Globemaster III** bound for **Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst**, New Jersey.
A crew from the 452nd Air Mobility Wing departed April 5 with Air Force Reserve medics from the 940th Air Refueling Wing, **Beale AFB**; 349th AMW; **Travis AFB**; and 452nd AMW, March ARB.
“It’s important to get our reservists out the door quickly to help combat the spread of COVID-19 and take care of Americans,” said**Brig. Gen. Stacey Scarisbrick**, Air Force Reserve Command Force Generation Center commander.
According to AFRC, the command mobilized more than 120 doctors and nurses, along with respiratory technicians, who departed their home stations for JBMDL for further in-processing with the U.S. Northern Command’s Joint Forces Land Component Command, based out of New Jersey.
The medical professionals are slated for follow-on movement to New York City’s Javits Center, a 2,910-bed field hospital, which is one of the largest in the United States.
“California is stepping up to help our fellow Americans in New York and across the country who are being impacted the hardest right now by the COVID-19 pandemic,” said California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
The governor announced April 6 the state would loan 500 state-owned ventilators to the states most impacted by COVID-19, starting with New York, which as of April 6, has more than 122,000 cases of the virus.
Chief Master Sgt. Derek Crowder, 60th Air Mobility Wing command chief, said the country must come together to fight COVID-19 and Travis AFB is ready to help the nation in any way.
“It doesn’t matter if you’re an active-duty Airman, civilian or a reservist, we are here to answer the call at a moment’s notice,” he said. “We are in this together, and we will get through this together."AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Beale AFB 



60 AMW 



March ARB 



C-17 Globemaster III 



AMC 



Air Mobility Command 



health 



COVID-19 



safety 



readiness 



Travis AFB 



349 AMW 



healthcare 



coronavirus
EXHIBIT 33.1








REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Date:  March 29, 2016





Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 12.2



Certification by the Principal Financial
Officer Pursuant to



Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002







I, Frank Zhigang Zhao, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report
on Form 20-F of Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: June 18, 2020







| |    
| | ---
| | By:
| |