alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Airmen receive Gen. Larry O. Spencer Innovation Award during AFA ceremonyPublished Sept. 27, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Victoria H. Taylor
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Capt. Michael Kanaan, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance enterprise lead, was presented with the Gen. Larry O. Spencer Award during the Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference, Sept. 17, in National Harbor, Maryland.
The award, presented by Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson, Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright, recognizes Kanaan as a thought leader in the digital field across all Air Force functions, who noticeably shapes the highest levels of operations, messaging and funding.
Preceding the presentation of the individual award, Master Sgt. Louis Lusco and Senior Airman Dakota Williamson, accepting on behalf of their 17-person Maintenance Top Coat Team at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, were recognized in the team category.
The annual award, created in 2015, is named after former Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Larry O. Spencer, who helped create an innovative culture for Airmen to follow, and championed the “Every Dollar Counts” campaign along with the Airmen Powered by Innovation website.
"The real innovation is out in the field, and we need to cultivate those ideas and encourage those Airmen," Spencer said in 2015 during the unveiling of the award. "There are great ideas out there and we owe it to our Airmen to listen to them."Gen Larry O Spencer 



innovation 



award 



SecAF 



CSAF 



CMSAF 



AFA 



air 



space 



cyberspace 



Conference 



MacDill AFB 



Airmen Powered by Innovation
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 9, 2005

/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
President, Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

February 7, 2018

Order 

Clerk

February 7, 2018

156906(92)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 156906

v COA: 331466

Jackson CC: 14-004531-FC

WILLIE EDDIE ANDERSON, II,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant for permission to 

file a pro per supplement to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The 

supplement submitted on February 1, 2018, is accepted for filing.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: SECAF Visits Whiteman Air Force Base, C-17 Makes Technological Leaps, and Recruiting Releases New AppPublished June 19, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Timmethy James
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force highlights the Secretary of the Air Force’s visit to Whiteman Air Force Base to discuss the importance of the nuclear mission, a super fast data link for the C-17 that gives aircrews an advantage in contested airspace, and the release of the new Air Force Recruiting Service App. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Timmethy James)





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:-Whiteman AFB Airmen share their role in strategic bomber mission with SecAF
- Tactical Data Link Experiment
- AFRS releases Aim High mobile appFeatured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



SecAF 



Secretary Barbara Barrett 



Secretary Barrett 



AMC 



Air Mobility Command 



data link 



C17 



C-17 



c130 



C-130 



AFRS 



Air Force recruiting 



Air Force Recruiting Service 



app 



Aim High
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2795 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand the definition of 

eligible program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand 

the definition of eligible program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Career and Technical 

5 Education Opportunity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS. 

7 The Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 

8 et seq.) is amended— 

9 (1) in section 481(b), by adding at the end the 

10 following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2795 IS

1 ‘‘(5)(A) For purposes of parts D and E, the term 

2 ‘eligible program’ includes a program of not less than 250 

3 clock hours of instruction, offered during a minimum of 

4 5 weeks of instruction that leads an industry-recognized 

5 credential. 

6 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘industry-recognized 

7 credential’ means an industry-recognized credential that— 

8 ‘‘(i) is demonstrated to be of high quality by the 

9 institution offering the program in the program par10 ticipation agreement under section 487; 

11 ‘‘(ii) meets the current, as of the date of the de12 termination, or projected needs of a local or regional 

13 workforce for recruitment, screening, hiring, reten14 tion, or advancement purposes— 

15 ‘‘(I) as determined by the State in which 

16 the program is located, in consultation with 

17 business entities; or 

18 ‘‘(II) as demonstrated by the institution of19 fering the program leading to the credential; 

20 and 

21 ‘‘(iii) is, where applicable, endorsed by a nation22 ally recognized trade association or organization rep23 resenting a significant part of the industry or sec24 tor.’’; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2795 IS

1 (2) in section 487(a), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(30) In the case of an institution that offers 

4 a program of not less than 250 clock hours of in5 struction, offered during a minimum of 5 weeks of 

6 instruction that leads an industry-recognized creden7 tial, as provided under section 481(b)(5), the institu8 tion will demonstrate to the Secretary that the in9 dustry-recognized credential is of high quality.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Casmyn Corp.
(the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 1999 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




                                          /s/ MARK S. ZUCKER
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Mark S. Zucker
                                          Chairman of the Board of
                                          Directors


                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
#### NORMA COSSEY v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
Opinion issued November 24, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— N O. 01
- 1 9
- 00 721
- CV

——————————— LORIANNE GALVAN , Appellant

V. RONALD BEAU GROOVER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 505th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 18
- DCV
- 248956

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Lorianne Galvan , has failed to timely file her brief. Appellant filed her notice of appeal on September 25, 2019. The clerk’s record was filed with the
Court on November 7 , 2019 , and no reporter’s record was taken. As a result,2

appellant’s brief was due on December 13, 2019

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38. 6 (a) (go verning time to file brief). However, no brief was filed. On December 30, 2019, appellant was notified by the Court that her appeal was subject to dismissal if she did not file her brief or a motion to extend time to file a brief within ten days. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief) , 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for want of prosecution ) , 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply with order of this Court)

. On January 6 , 2020, a ppellant filed a motion to extend time to file her brief, which was granted by the Court, extending appellant’s deadline to February 11, 2020

. Appellant failed to timely file her brief by the extended deadline. On February 14, 2020, appellant was again notified by the Court that her appeal was subject to dismissal if she did not file her brief or a motion to extend time to file a brief within ten days. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b) , 42.3(c)

. On February 24, 2020, appellant filed her secon d motion to extend t ime to file her brief. The Court granted appellant’s motion, extending appellant’s deadline to file her brief to March 12, 2020. Appellant again failed to timely file her brief by the extended deadline. On March 17 , 2020, appellant received a third notice from the Court that this appeal was subject to dismissal if she did not file her brief or a motion to extend time to file a3

brie f within ten days

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b) , 42.3(c)

. After more than

s even months, appellant has not adequately responded to the Court ’s third notice

. Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). A ll pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Adams

.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the DBUBS 2011-LC3Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Providence PlaceMall Loan Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.,as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, and KeyBank, National Association, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 13, 2020

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[No. 44619-3-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### Roeder Company, *Appellant,*v. K&E Moving & Storage Co., Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 98-2-00750-4, Steven J. Mura, J., entered May 7, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Agid, C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Webster, JJ. Now published at 102 Wn. App. 49.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2011-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2012 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2012.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th day of March 2013.

 

----

 
| March 28,   2013 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  |   |
|                  | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman |
|                  | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman |
|                  | Title: | President |

 

----
[No. 17866-8-III.

Division Three.

April 13, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jose Rodriguez Medrano, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 98-1-00200-3, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered September 16, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Kato, J.
[No. 43523-0-I.

Division One.

May 1, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry Lynn Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-31888-2, Donald D. Haley, J., entered March 26, 1999. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Agid, C.J., and Cox, J.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the DBUBS 2011-LC3Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, asPooled Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as ProvidencePlace Mall Loan Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors,Inc., as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, and KeyBank, National Association, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 20, 2018

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jon W. Howie, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K/A of Chuy’s Holdings, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date: April 15, 2016


/s/ Jon W. HowieJon W. HowieVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[No. 44179-5-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ernest Franklin, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-1-07863-2, Richard A. Jones, J., entered February 25, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.