alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57043-57044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials,

[[Page 57044]]

and personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; EUREKA.
    Date: November 8, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Amalfi Hotel, 200 West Kinzie Street, Chicago, IL 60654.
    Contact Person: William C. Benzing, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3204, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-0660, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b795e554152555c4c7b565a525715555253155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bc9eee5f1e2e5ecfccbe6eae2e7a5e5e2e3a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 10, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-23268 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[No. 23820-9-II.

Division Two.

May 12, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Susan J. Powell, *Respondent,*and Donald Scott Powell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 97-3-02196-0, Arthur W. Verharen, J., entered August 28, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Houghton, J.
#### Davis & Hardin v. James Wrigley.

(No. 510, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 568.)

Appeal from Liberty County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 730. *The transfer of a note secured by lien carries with it the lien also.*The transfer of a note, secured by lien on property to secure its payment, conveys with the note the lien also. [White, Smith & Baldwin v. Downs, 40 Tex. 225.]

§ 731. *Collateral securities are not affected by the note’s becoming barred by limitation.*It is urged that limitation bars a right to recovery on the note, and that therefore the securities can no longer be held as a pledge. The authorities are against this position. ■ In an action *400for the conversion of stocks pledged to secure a loan admitted not to have been paid, it was said: “ Statutes of limitation affect only the remedy, not the right, and, except as defenses to actions against the person, only create a presumption of payment of the . money demand, and may be rebutted like any other evidence thereof.” [Jones v. Merchants’ Bank, *4*Robertson (N. Y. Superior Court), 221.] But when one retains a chattel pledged for a debt, after the amount of the debt has been tendered, the owner can only recover in damages the value of the chattel after deducting the amount of the debt. [Jarvis, Adm’r, v. Rogers, 15 Mass. 388.] .

March 28, 1879.

The maker of a promissory note cannot recover back dioses in action pledged by him as security for its payment with the holder, simply when, and because, an action upon such note is barred by the statute of limitations. If the note was originally obligatory, nothing short of actual payment or tender of it will enable him to do so. An obligation is not extinguished for all purposes, though suit be not brought on it within the period fixed by the statute. [6 Robinson (N. Y. Sup. Ct.), 162; Bulkeley v. Welch, 31 Conn. 339.] In an action by the pledgor against the pledgee for conversion, the latter may recover the amount of the debt. [Story on Bailments (5th ed.), § 327, vol. 2; Brightman v. Reeves, 21 Tex. 70.]

Reversed and rendered.
#### James Harrington v. Galveston County.

(No. 268, Op. Book No. 2, p. 448.)

Error from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 792. *General demurrer; special exception; office of.*It is the office of a general demurrer to test the legal sufficiency of the cause of action, or of the defense interposed, and not the form of the pleading. It is the office of a special demurrer, or, more correctly denominated, a special exception, to point out some special ground of objection to the manner of pleading the cause of action or matter of defense.

§ 793. *Statutes; rules of construction of.*The following are well settled general rules for the construction of a public statute: 1. That repeals by implication are not favored. 2. That legislative enactments are, in the absence of a clear expression to the contrary, deemed to relate to the present and the future, and are generally to operate *in futuro.*3. That the intention of the legislature is to prevail. As has been said, “such a construction ought to be put upon a statute as may best answer the intention which the makers had in view; and that is sometimes to be collected from the cause or necessity for making it, át oilier times from other circumstances. Whenever the intention can be discovered, it ought to be followed with reason and discretion in its construction, although such construction may seem contrary to its *438letter.” This rule would only apply where there is obscurity in the language employed by the legislature. The general rule, which is said to be cardinal and universal, is that, if the statute is plain and unambiguous, there is no room, for construction or interpretation. The legislature having spoken, if their intention is free from doubt, their will must be obeyed. So, when the law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they had plainly expressed, and, consequently, no room is left for construction. [2 Cranch, 358-391; Sedgwick on Stat., & Const. Law, 229 et seq.]

March 23, 1881.

§ 794.' *Tax law of 1871 was not repealed by that of 1876 as to the collection of taxes.*The act of April 22, 1871 [Pas. Dig. 7654 ej; seq.], was not repealed by the act of November 21,1876 [Gen. Laws 1876, p. 242], in so far as remedies for the collection of taxes imposed under the act of 1871 were provided for, but taxes levied under that act could still be collected in the absence of any express provision to the contrary. The act of 1876 only repealed former tax laws in so far as those laws were in conflict with the provisions of that act, and it was not in conflict with any of the provisions of that act to enforce the collection of taxes assessed under former statutes. [Clegg v. The State, 42 Tex. 605.] This was a suit by appellee to recover from appellant money due by him for occupation taxes assessed against him as a liquor dealer under the tax law of 1871. Appellant’s defense was that the act of 1871 had been repealed by subsequent legislation, and that the taxes could not be legally collected. The judgment of the court below was against the appellant for the amount of the taxes claimed.

Affirmed.
#### F. C. J. Leberman v. Tyra Hill & Co.

(Nos. 391-3, Op. Book No. 1, p. 240.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§26. *Judgment, conclusiveness as to recitals in.*Where the judgment recited that “ the court, having fully heard and understood the pleadings and evidence herein, it is considered,” etc., *held,*that the recital will be taken as conclusive against an objection urged, that the judgment was one by default, in the absence of anything appearing *19in the record to support the objection or contradict the judgment recitals.

April 30, 1877.

§ 27. The maxim *de minimis non curat lex*applied to a claim that the judgment was excessive, where the excess was a small amount, viz.: a dollar or so.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11

                    RAMSAY HEALTH CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)



                                                             Quarter Ended
                                                              September 30
                                                       1996          1995 
 
 
PRIMARY
   Weighted average common shares outstanding.......  8,173,731     7,721,142
   Class B convertible preferred stock, Series C....        ---*          --- *
        TOTAL COMMON AND DILUTIVE
        COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES....................  8,173,731     7,721,142

        Net Income (Loss) Available to Common 
         Shareholders............................... $   57,000**  $ (482,000)**

        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE.................      $0.01        $(0.06)

FULLY DILUTED
   Weighted average common shares outstanding.......  8,173,731     7,735,328
   Class B convertible preferred stock, Series C....        ---*         --- *
        TOTAL COMMON AND DILUTIVE
        COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES....................  8,173,731     7,735,328

        Net Income (Loss) Available to Common
         Shareholders............................... $   57,000**  $ (482,000)**


        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE................. $      0.01       $(0.06)





*    The Class B convertible preferred stock, Series C were anti-dilutive in the
     quarters  ended  September  30,  1996 and 1995 and,  accordingly,  were not
     considered in the calculation of earnings per share in these quarters.

**   Net income  (loss)  reported for the period was  decreased  (increased)  by
     dividends  related to the Class B convertible  preferred  stock,  Series C,
     totalling $91,000.
### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T O c t obe r 14, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 11720 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 4 - 0 0 0 6 9 - C R - WS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s T O N Y O 'N E A L L L O Y D , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e So u th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( O c t ob e r 14, 2005) B efo re H U L L , W IL S O N an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: T onyO ’ N e a l L l oy d appe a l s hi s s e nt e nc e of 120 m onths of

i m pr i s onm e nt2

b a s e do n h is c o n v ic tio n f o rp o s s e s s io n o f

af ir e a rm a s af

e lo n . 1 8 U .S .C . § 922( g) ( 1) . L l oy d a r gue s tha tbe c aus e he c om m i tt e d hi s c r i m e a f t e rB l a ke l yv. W a s hi ngt on, 542 U . S . 296, 124 S . C t . 2531 ( 2004) , butbe f or e U ni t e d S t a t e s v. B o o k e r , 5 4 3 U .S . — , 1 2 5 S . C t. 7 3 8 ( 2 0 0 5 ) , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt v io la te dh is r ig h ts u n d e rth e e x p o s t f

a c to p r in c ip le o f

f a irw a rn in g in th e D u e P r o c e s s C lau s e w h e n it e n h a n c e dh is s e n te n c e b a s e do n p o s t- v e r d ic t f in d in g s o f

f a c t a n dr e tr o a c tiv e ly ap p l i e dth e s e n t e n c i n g g u i d e l i n e s a s a d v i s o ry . B e c au s e , a s L l o y dc o n c e d e s , we have rej ec t ed thi s argum ent , U ni t ed S t at es v. D un can, 40 0 F . 3d 12 97 (11th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) , a n d“o n lyth e S up r e m e C o u rt o rth is C o u rt s ittin g e n b a n c c a n ju d ic ia lly o v e rru le ap r io rp a n e l d e c is io n ,” U n ite dS ta te s v . M a rte , 3 5 6 F .3 d1 3 3 6 , 1 3 4 4 ( 1 1 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) , w e a f

f i rm. AF F I RME D.
[No. 43235-4-I.

Division One.

May 1, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Willetta Marie Anderson, *Defendant,*Ricky Lee Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-01541-8, Marilyn R. Sellers, J., entered August 3, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EX-35.4


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of August 1, 2011, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, NA, as a Pooled Special
Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Providence Place Mall Loan
Special Servicer, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian,
and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series DBUBS 2011-LC3 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of
   its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
   throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th
day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
LARRY ALONZO GIBBS, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5574

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 11, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Jud ge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO

, CLARK

, and MARSTILLER

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### PROMONT REALTY CORP. v. TOWN OF WEST ORANGE.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification' denied. '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,348                  42,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,208,594               1,208,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,620,768               9,620,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,569,794               2,569,794
<PP&E>                                       4,322,236               4,322,236
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,604,302               2,604,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,648,933              18,648,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,926,120               7,926,120
<BONDS>                                      7,475,037               7,475,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          700,000                 700,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       128,580                 128,580
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,990,391               1,990,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,648,933              18,648,933
<SALES>                                      4,832,902              14,290,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,832,902              14,290,297
<CGS>                                        5,205,714              12,790,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,205,714              12,790,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,113,314               2,548,776
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324,953                 647,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,811,079)             (1,696,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (647,263)             (2,477,132)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,163,816)                 780,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,163,816)                 780,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)                    0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)                    0.07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2001
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




                                          /s/ MARK S. ZUCKER
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Mark S. Zucker
                                          Chairman of the Board of
                                          Directors


                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          284778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1818210
<ALLOWANCES>                                    109630
<INVENTORY>                                    1650048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4005461
<PP&E>                                         5216300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3627648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7266381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1143058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,089
<OTHER-SE>                                     6061903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7266381
<SALES>                                        3269107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3269107
<CGS>                                          1583745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1583745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1359221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 68000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 256858
<INCOME-TAX>                                     79000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             177858
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    177858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>