alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of M.D.C.
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010, accompanying this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 23, 2010 |  | /s/ Larry A. Mizel     
|                     |  | Larry A. Mizel         
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Section 1350 of Title 18, United States Code, and is not being filed as part of the report or as a separate disclosure document.
News United States Air Force
 US B-52H trains with Colombian Air Force, Ecuadorian NavyPublished Nov. 24, 2020
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Angela Ruiz
                        
                        
                        12th Air Force (Air Forces Southern)
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                Two U.S. Air Force **B-52H Stratofortress** aircraft participated in “Brother’s Shield,” a Colombian Air Force led exercise, and in “UNITAS LXI,” an Ecuadorian Navy led exercise, in the **U.S. Southern Command**’s area of responsibility Nov. 8.This twofold mission began well before the B-52H crews took off that morning. There had been countless teleconferences and planning meetings to coordinate the combined training exercises between the U.S. Air Force and our partner nation’s militaries.Brother’s Shield was the first mission to be completed celebrating the Colombian Air Forces 101st anniversary. The B-52H crews supported the Colombian Air Force Kfir fighter aircraft pilots in air-to-air interception training while developing interoperability capabilities in order to increase hemispheric security and regional stability under NATO standards between the U.S. and Colombia.U.S. Air Force Maj. Angel Serna, **12th Air Force (Air Force Southern)** Colombia desk officer, explained that the name of the exercise “Brother’s Shield” developed from the close relationship between the U.S. Air Force and the Colombian Air Force. During this training mission, the Colombian Kfirs flew in a formation with the U.S. Air Force B-52Hs in order to shield them from enemy combatants.“Anytime we have the privilege to integrate with our allies in a fighter integration or naval exercise, we are excited,” said U.S. Air Force Capt. Joshua Henry, 96th Bomb Squadron B-52H pilot and mission lead. “We identified a lot of similarities in the way that the Colombian’s conduct their intercept training, and working with the UNITAS exercise proved to be very beneficial as well. Further developing our tactics, techniques and procedures with the navy is always beneficial for us as an air player since this is not something we have the opportunity to train on a consistent basis with real time naval assets.”UNITAS is an annual naval exercise conducted in the Atlantic and Pacific waters around Central and South America. The Ecuadorian Navy hosted this year’s exercise Nov. 2-11, with participants from eleven countries. The B-52 crews integrated and trained with joint forces for UNITAS to include the Ecuadorian Navy to provide a simulated dynamic targeting capability for naval forces.“I haven’t worked with the Colombian or Ecuadorian militaries before, but anytime that we as a community have an opportunity to work with partner nations, we always learn a lot,” Henry said. “Colombia and Ecuador were very professional, and a lot of our lessons learned were developed from the planning stages.”LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



12th Air Force 



Colombia 



UNITAS LXI 



Brother’s Shield 



B-52H Stratofortress 



Kfir 



96th Bomb Squadron 



Ecuador
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 28, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. David H. Duey Revocable Trust, David H. Duey, trustee*, Scottsbluff, Nebraska; Diana Duey Strokan Trust, Diana Duey Strokan, trustee, Plattsmouth, Nebraska; Ann Duey Revocable Trust, Ann Duey, trustee, Scottsbluff, Nebraska; Sara Lierman, Gretna, Nebraska; Laura Strickland, Brentwood, Tennessee; Dan Duey, Lincoln, Nebraska; Natasha Duran, Santa Fe, New Mexico; and Nathan Strokan, Plattsmouth, Nebraska; all members of the Duey Family Group, to retain control of Cass County State Company, and thereby indirectly retain control of Cass County Bank, Inc., both of Plattsmouth, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 8, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-22724 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 of Fleetmatics Group PLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James M. Travers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen Lifshatz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ James M. Travers                    
|    |  | James M. Travers Chief Executive
Officer
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Stephen Lifshatz                    
|    |  | Stephen Lifshatz Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

I, Daniel J. Gardetto, certify that:



|(a) | A review of the Servicers activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from July 1, 2011 to December 31,
2011 has been made under my supervision.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects
throughout the aforementioned period.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated March 19, 2012



/s/ Daniel J. GardettoDaniel J. GardettoAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto OwnerTrust 2011-B
No. 11,842.

#### Wallace *v.*Brooker.

Pleading. — *Complaint. '-*— Motion *to Make*Specific.— *Occupying*Claimant.— Where a complaint, under the occupying claimant law, seeks a recovery for improvements, described merely as “ clearing and fencing, removing stones and putting the land in a state of cultivation,” of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars, it is error to overrule a motion to make such complaint more specific.

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

*J. Rowley*and *H. Corbin,*for appellant.

*E. Myers,*for appellee.

Elliott, J. —

The appellee’s complaint *seeks to recover*the value of improvements placed by him on land from which he was evicted by the appellant, and 'is founded on the occupying claimants’ law. The improvements are thus described: *“*Clearing and fencing, removing stones and putting the land in a state of cultivation,” and it is averred that the improvements were of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars-The appellant moved to make the complaint more specific, but this motion was overruled, and that ruling is assigned for error.

The court erred in overruling this motion. The appellant was entitled to a statement of the character and value of the clearing, and of the kind and amount of fencing, as well as a specific statement of what was done in the way of putting the land in a state of cultivation. We do not think it is necessary that the appellee should state the number of days he was engaged in the work, but we do think that it is necessary that he should separate his claim into items, and state the character of each item in general terms and give the value of it. A defendant has a right to a definite statement of the claim asserted against him. A great degree of particularity is not required, but the particulars of a claim composed of *599several items must be separately stated, so that the character and amount of each can be known.

Filed Feb. 20, 1886.

Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 35.6



|     |  |  |  |                                                                          
|---- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis
Road Columbia, Maryland 21045

Citibank N.A.

17g-5 Information
Provider

ratingagencynotice@citi.com

RE: Annual Statement
as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), as Securities
Administrator and Paying Agent1, hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) a review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement
listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Schedule B hereto.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|February 27, 2014                                       
|                                                        
|/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin                                  
|Kristen Ann Cronin Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



|1 | Effective January 1, 2014, Wells Fargo resigned as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent, and Citibank N.A. was appointed as successor Securities Administrator and successor Paying Agent. See the Form 8-K filed
on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO



---

Schedule A

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011, for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2, by and among Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.2



|2 | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 to reflect the resignation of Wells Fargo as the Securities Administrator and Paying Agent (among other roles). See the Form
8-K filed on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

Schedule B

None



3
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEPHEN OLITSKY.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4798]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 ZERO DEFICIT BUDGET RESOLUTION PASSED

  (Mr. HOKE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. HOKE. Mr. Speaker, Rome burns and Nero fiddles. Since yesterday 
at this time, the national debt has increased $548 million. That is 
almost $23 million every single hour, $383,000 every single minute, 
$9,000 every second. Every newborn baby enters the world owing $17,300 
of his or her share of the national debt. That means that between 
yesterday morning at this time and today, we have on a per capita basis 
increased the debt about $2.10 each.
  Thomas Jefferson said that ``We should consider ourselves 
unauthorized to saddle posterity with our debts, and morally bound to 
pay them ourselves.'' Yesterday the Republican members of the Committee 
on the Budget, joined by one of the Democrat members of the committee, 
passed what will be a zero, goose egg, nothing, no deficit in the year 
2002, balanced budget resolution.

                          ____________________
```
#### DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA *v.*GREGORY.

Gift Enterprises ; Criminal Law.

A trading stamp company which sells its stamps to merchants, whose names it prints in its directory of merchants, for $3.50 for 1,000, *272which stamps the merchants deliver to their customers, who have the right to redeem them of the company in articles of merchandise only when presented in'books containing 990 stamps, and also to redeem a single stamp for a pen, and ten or more for cash at the rate of $1 per 1,000, violates sees. 1176 and 1177, District of Columbia, Rev. Stat., making it a criminal offense to engage in the business of conducting a gift enterprise as defined in the act of the late legislative assembly of this District of August 23, 1871. Mr. Justice Van Orsdel dissenting. (Following *Lansburgh v. District of Columbia,*11 App. D. O. 512, and *District of Columbia*v. *Kraft,*ante, 253.)

No. 2119.

Submitted April 11, 1910.

Decided May 10, 1910.

In error to the Police Court of the District of Columbia.

. *Judgment reversed.*

The facts are stated iu the opinion.

*Mr. Edward II. Thomas,*Corporation Counsel, and *Mr. William Henry White,*Assistant, for the plaintiff in error.

*Mr. A. 8. Worthington*and *Mr. J ohn Hall J ones*for the defendant in error.

Mr. *Chief Justice*Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case is before us on a writ of error granted to review the judgment of the police court, quashing the information. The charge is that of engaging in a gift enterprise as defined in secs. *1176*and *1177.*D. C. *Her.*Stat.

The case was heard at the same time with that of *District of Columbia*v. *Kraft,*which has been first decided. [Ante, 253].

The defendant in error is the representative of the Sperry *&*Hutchinson Company, which is the same that was involved in the case of *Lansburgh*v. *District of Columbia,*11 App. D. C. 512. The business carried on is substantially the same as there. The only differences are that the stamps are now sold *273at $3.50 per thousand to contracting merchants. They are still redeemable in articles of merchandise only when presented in books containing 990 stamps.

A single stamp is redeemable with a single “Falcon pen.” Ten or more are redeemable in cash at the rate of $1 per thousand. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company has not the so-called co-operative feature of the Economy Company, which is involved in *Kraft’s Case.*Receivers of its stamps are not required to become members, and pay nothing to the company to bo entitled to receive them. It will be noticed that the terms of redemption differ slightly from those of Kraft’s concern.

The fundamental question involved in each case is the same. Having discussed it fully in *Kraft’s Case,*it is unnecessary to do more than refer to the opinion in that case as decisive of this.

The judgment will be reversed with costs, and the cause remanded to the Police Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion in *Kraft’s Case. Reversed.*

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel,

dissenting.

An application by the defendant in error to the Supreme Court of the United States for the allowance of the writ of certiorari, was denied by that court October *24,*1910.
News United States Air Force
 Explore "Next Gen Debrief" and innovation on new "The Air Force Starts Here" podcastPublished Feb. 11, 2021
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                A deep dive into innovation through the lens of a Spark Tank submission called “Next Gen Debrief” is the focus of the latest episode of "The Air Force Starts Here," released Feb. 9.
Dan Hawkins from the **Air Education and Training Command** public affairs team spoke virtually with Maj. Kevin Hawkins and 1st Lt. Adam Treece from the 56th Operational Support Squadron at **Luke Air Force Base**, Arizona, who along with Dylan Kerr, a student at Arizona State University, created a 3-D augmented reality system that will revolutionize the way pilots conduct mission debriefs.
Modernizing the Air and Space Forces is a priority for the Air Force and aggressively and cost-effectively modernizing education and training to transform the way Airmen learn is one of AETC’s top priorities. As part of AETC’s team that will represent the command at Spark Tank 2021 coming Feb. 24-26 during the virtual Air Force Association Aerospace Warfare Symposium, Maj. Hawkins and Treece talk about how they adapted Microsoft HoloLens2 smart-glasses into a tool aircrews can use to conduct detailed mission debriefs from an interactive, three-dimensional perspective.
Treece also talks about how the Spark Tank competition is a huge part of how the command values innovation and operationalizing Airmen’s best ideas to improve operations.
The professional development podcasts are designed to help communicate and inform Total Force Airmen across the globe on relevant, timely topics related to the recruiting, training, education and development fields and can be listened to on the government network on the AETC website, **DVIDS**, or via mobile application as well as on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Play. Future episodes are set to cover a wide range of topics, including force development, and much more.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AETC 



Air Education and Training Command 



innovation 



Spark Tank 



Next Gen Debrief 



podcast
News United States Air Force
 JTF-Bravo facilitates repatriation of US citizens from HondurasPublished March 26, 2020
                        
                        By Joint Task Force-Bravo public affairs
                        
                        
                        U.S. Southern Command
                **SOTO CANO AIR BASE, Honduras (AFNS)  --**
                At the request of the U.S. Department of State and at the direction of U.S. Southern Command, a U.S. Air Force C-130J Super Hercules is transporting 78 U.S. citizens from Soto Cano Air Base, Honduras, who were previously unable to return home, to Naval Air Station Norfolk, Virginia.
The mission is part of an ongoing interagency effort led by the U.S. Department of State to assist American citizens unable to return home from countries around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Our team has been working closely with the U.S. Embassy in Honduras to ensure we are able to fully leverage opportunities to bring American citizens home,” said Col. Steven Barry, Joint Task Force-Bravo commander. “We continue to support these ongoing efforts while maintaining our posture as a ready force for U.S. Southern Command.”
The C-130J is part of a regular resupply mission to Soto Cano AB. The return flight will also include mission-critical U.S. service members.
Through its active, Reserve and Air National Guard components, Air Mobility Command has been supporting the U.S. government’s ongoing COVID-19 mitigation response efforts and executing rapid global mobility operations in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency-led, whole-of-government effort to combat the coronavirus outbreak.
For information about the arrival at NAS Norfolk, contact Kelly Wirfel via email at kelly.wirfel@navy.mil or by phone at (757) 322-2576.
U.S. citizens affected by COVID-19 travel restrictions should visit www.travel.state.gov or call (202) 501-4444 for assistance.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Joint Task Force-Bravo 



JTF-Bravo 



COVID-19 



coronavirus 



U.S. Southern Command 



Air Mobility Command 



AMC 



C-130J Super Hercules 



Soto Cano Air Base 



honduras 



U.S. Department of State