alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000771998
<NAME>                        OUTLOOK INCOME/GROWTH FUND VIII
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,178
<PP&E>                                          20,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              207
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,540
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,840
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,262)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (100.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (100.58)
        


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6768

NATHANIEL R. WEBB , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TROOPER HUNDLEY; TROOPER CLAYTON; SERGEANT GARDNER; SERGEANT GASKINS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:20

- ct

- 03326

- BO )

Submitted : October 31, 2023 Decided: December 28, 2023

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Nathaniel R. Webb , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6768 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel R. Webb appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as barred by the statute of limitations and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order s
. Webb v. Hundley , No. 5:20

- ct

- 03326

- BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2023 & July 19, 2023 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this co urt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6768 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.32
 MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT
Regulation 51-102 Respecting Continuous Disclosure Obligations
Form 51-102F3
 1.
    
    NAME AND ADDRESS OF COMPANY:THERATECHNOLOGIES INC.
2310 Alfred-Nobel Boulevard
Montreal, Québec
Canada H4S 2B42.
    
    DATE OF MATERIAL CHANGE:June 2, 20113.
    
    NEWS RELEASE:A news release describing this material change was issued on June 2, 2011 on Marketwire.
A copy of the news release is available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.4.
    
    SUMMARY OF MATERIAL CHANGE:On June 2, 2011, Theratechnologies Inc. (the Corporation) announced that it had
re-evaluated its research and development business model (the R&D Model). The review of
the R&D Model resulted in the collective dismissal of 24 employees and the Corporation
estimates a reduction in payroll expenses of approximately $300,000 for the remainder of
fiscal 2011 and approximately $2.5 million for fiscal 2012.5.
    
    FULL DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CHANGE:On June 2, 2011, the Corporation announced that it had re-evaluated its R&D Model. The
Corporation intends to call upon partners in the public and private arena to help it bring
its research and development project forward. The review of the R&D Model resulted in the
collective dismissal of 24 employees and the Corporation estimates a reduction in payroll
expenses of approximately $300,000 for the remainder of fiscal 2011 and approximately $2.5
million for fiscal 2012.6.
    
    RELIANCE ON SUBSECTION 7.1(2) OR (3) OF NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-102:Not applicable.7.
    
    OMITTED INFORMATION:Not applicable.




---



##### 



8.
    
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER:For further information, contact Jocelyn Lafond, Vice President, Legal Affairs, and
Corporate Secretary of the Company at (514) 336-4804, ext. 288.9.
    
    DATE OF REPORT:June 3, 2011
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License
                             No.
Name/Address
Date
                             reissued018694F
Global Parcel System LLC, 8304 Northwest 30th Terrace, Miami, FL 33122
Aug. 13, 2010.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2010-22553 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan Norcross, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: February 8, 2010By: /s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6749]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

  The following reports of committees were submitted:

       By Mrs. KASSEBAUM, from the Committee on Labor and Human 
     Resources, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute:
       S. 454. A bill to reform the health care liability system 
     and improve health care quality through the establishment of 
     quality assurance programs, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 
     104-83).
     

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 385 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 385

 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2013

Mr. Begich (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Tester, and Mr. 
    Baucus) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIMELY SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim submitted to an 
Indian Health Service contracting officer pursuant to the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) on 
or before October 31, 2005, involving a claim that accrued after 
October 1, 1995, and on or before September 30, 1999, shall be deemed 
to be timely submitted.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 8.1 

**Subsidiaries of Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.**

The following chart lists each of our subsidiaries which we owned, directly or indirectly, as of December 31, 2013, and April 29, 2014: 

1. Concesionaria Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.P.I. de C.V., a variable capital investment promotion stock corporation organized underthe laws of Mexico 

2. Comercializadora Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

3. Servicios Administrativos Volaris, S.A. de C.V. a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

4. Servicios Corporativos Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 485 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 485

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain a 
hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a 
  fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 
                                 fuel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2013

  Mr. Roberts (for himself, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Johanns) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain a 
hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a 
  fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 
                                 fuel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ENDORSEMENT EXEMPTION.

    (a) Exclusion.--Section 5117(d)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel in 
                quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less that 
                is--
                            ``(i) driven by a class A commercial 
                        driver's license holder who is a custom 
                        harvester, an agricultural retailer, an 
                        agricultural business employee, an agricultural 
                        cooperative employee, or an agricultural 
                        producer; and
                            ``(ii) clearly marked with a placard 
                        reading `Diesel Fuel'.''.
    (b) Exemption.--Section 31315(b) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Hazardous materials endorsement exemption.--The 
        Secretary shall exempt all class A commercial driver's license 
        holders who are custom harvesters, agricultural retailers, 
        agricultural business employees, agricultural cooperative 
        employees, or agricultural producers from the requirement to 
        obtain a hazardous material endorsement under part 383 of title 
        49, Code of Federal Regulations, while operating a service 
        vehicle carrying diesel fuel in quantities of 3,785 liters 
        (1,000 gallons) or less if the tank containing such fuel is 
        clearly marked with a placard reading `Diesel Fuel'.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 13 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01342
- CV
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ME DICAL CENTER, Appellant
V. MARY GREESON, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 07506 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellee’s March 12, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellee shall file a brief by APRIL 6, 2015 . We caution appellee that no further extension of time will be granted in t his accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                                  VERITEC, INC.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned, Van Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Gerald Fors, the
Chief Financial Officer of Veritec, Inc. (the "Company"), individually, has
executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report").

     The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of December 31, 2005 (the last day of the period
          covered by this Report).

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certification as of
the 14 day of November, 2006.


                                        /s/ Van Thuy Tran
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Van Thuy Tran, Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Gerald Fors
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gerald Fors, Chief Financial Officer


                                       20
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERTHA SOTO-DE TAPIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71429

Agency No. A077-077-629

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

Bertha Soto-De Tapia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to remand

based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

SEP 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71429

remand. Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008). We

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Soto-De Tapia’s contention that her

statements taken at the border violated 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c) because she failed to

exhaust this issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th

Cir. 2004). 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Soto-De Tapia’s motion to

remand due to ineffective assistance of counsel because she failed to adequately

comply with the requirements set forth in Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637

(BIA 1988), and the ineffective assistance she alleges is not plain on the face of the

record. See Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592, 597-99 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Pararescue Trains at Sea, PJ Rodeo 2021, Prime Beef Builds CapabilityPublished Nov. 26, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force highlights joint training off the coast of Japan with pararescuers and the Army, the PJ Rodeo tests skills of pararescuers from around the world, and Prime Base Engineer Emergency Forces (Prime BEEF) Airmen test their skills at a range of jobs needed to set up a base from scratch as part of an Agile Combat Employment (ACE) exercise at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. (Hosted by Airman 1st Class Garrett Hess)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Army Vessels and Air Force Helicopters Conduct Joint Training off Okinawa Coast****- It's back, the 2021 PJ Rodeo and Reunion****- Prime BEEF exercise develops agile, multi-capable Airmen at Nellis AFB**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 13, 2014

Decided February 13, 2014

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS

, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON

, Circuit Judge

No. 13

‐ 2773

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

DANNY A. SORIA

, Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

No. 12

‐ CR

‐ 00164

Rudolph T. Randa,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Danny Soria used a peer

‐ to

‐ peer network to download child pornography. FBI

agents executed a search warrant at his home and found 134 videos and 1,073 images of

child pornography on his computers and storage media. After the district court denied

Soria’s motion to suppress the evidence from the search, he pleaded guilty

unconditionally to one count of receiving child pornography. 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2).

He was sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment—the statutory minimum for the offense,

id. § 2252A(b)(1)—and 10 years’ supervised release. His plea agreement includes a

waiver of his right to appeal any sentence within the statutory maximum except on NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 13

‐ 2773 Page 2

grounds that the sentencing judge considered constitutionally impermissible factors or

that his appointed lawyer was ineffective.

Soria filed a notice of appeal despite the waiver, but his lawyer believes that the

appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw under Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967). Soria has not responded to his lawyer’s motion, see C IR

. R. 51(b), and we confine

our review to the matters discussed in counsel’s facially adequate brief, see United States

v. Schuh

, 289 F.3d 968, 973–74 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel advises that Soria does not want his guilty plea set aside, so the lawyer

appropriately omits discussion about the adequacy of the plea colloquy or the

voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Konczak

, 683 F.3d 348, 349 (7th Cir.2012);

United States v. Knox

, 287 F.3d 667, 671–72 (7th Cir. 2002). It follows, says counsel, that

Soria’s appeal waiver makes this case frivolous. We agree. An appeal waiver stands or

falls with the guilty plea. United States v. Zitt

, 714 F.3d 511, 515 (7th Cir. 2013); United

States v. Sakellarion

, 649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir. 2011); United States v. Cole

, 569 F.3d 774,

776 (7th Cir. 2009). And, as counsel notes, the exceptions to Soria’s waiver are not

applicable. Accordingly, we must enforce Soria’s appeal waiver.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED

, and the appeal is DISMISSED

.
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of the activities of Deere Credit Services, Inc. for the period from November 1, 2011 through October 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 20, 2011 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2011 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 
| Date:   January 11, 2013 | Deere   Credit Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          | By                            | */s/   James A. Israel* |   |
|                          |                               |   |
|                          |                               | James   A. Israel |
|                          |                               |   |
|                          |                               | President |

 

----