alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Starflick.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Zoltan Nagy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 25th day of February, 2013.








ZOLTAN NAGYZoltan NagyChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

RENTECH NITROGEN PARTNERS, L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rentech Nitrogen Partners, L.P., (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dan J. Cohrs, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: December 14, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Dan J. Cohrs       
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Dan J. Cohrs           
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 99.1




                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.



                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  February 11, 2003             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

                                      -1-
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1022]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           TRIBUTE TO PANAMAX

                                 ______

                          HON. LYNN C. WOOLSEY

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Friday, May 12, 1995

  Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and celebrate the 
20th anniversary of Panamax of San Rafael. Panamax, the country's 
foremost designer and manufacturer of power protection equipment, is 
deserving of special congressional recognition. What started out as a 
one-room, single-employee operation has become a multimillion-dollar 
enterprise that provides employment opportunities to over 100 
individuals. Panamax has been a strong supporter of small business and 
has a record of hiring employees from the Sixth Congressional District.
  Panamax has earned a reputation for innovation and service to 
producers and users of a wide variety of high-technology equipment. The 
company has developed an important niche in the area of devices that 
provide protection from power surges and spikes. It also provides a 
complete guaranty on every unit produced.
  Panamax has strongly supported international trade and has 
substantially expanded its trade with Canada, Mexico, and other Latin 
America countries. The company is currently preparing to expand further 
to the Pacific Rim countries.
  Mr. Speaker, it is my great pleasure to pay tribute and congratulate 
Panamax as they mark two decades of service. I am very proud to be 
representing such a fine company in Congress. I extend my best wishes 
to Henry Moody, and the Panamax family, for continued success in the 
years to come.

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Louisa Sanfratello, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Amplitech Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report"):

 

|   | (1)    | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

Dated: December 6, 2018 

|   |                                                                                                         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:    | */s/ Louisa Sanfratello*                                                                                     |   |
|   | Louisa Sanfratello, CPA

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

(principal financial and accounting officer) |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7364

BERNARD BAGLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director of the South Carolina

Department of Corrections; CHARLES MOLONY

CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-95-1786-2-23)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Bagley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Bagley v. Moore, No. CA-95-1786-2-23 (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 1996). See

Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23,

1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EX-35.1
(logo) FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
It's a privilege to serve you

Feb 28, 2013

Servicer Compliance Statement
For SEMT 2011-2


(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the immediately preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement and the Reconstitution
Agreement from the above referenced trust during such period has been made
under such officer's supervision, and
(ii) To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Reconstitution
Agreement for the above referenced trust in all material respects throughout
such calendar year.

First Republic Bank

/s/ Lionel Antunes
Lionel Antunes
Vice President of Residential Lending
February 28, 2013

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego
Portland  Boston  Greenwich  New York


111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR
(800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413

CONVENIENT INTERNET BANKING AT www.firstrepublic.com * MEMBER FDIC
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 301 

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 

those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals 

and citizens of the United States at birth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. LEE, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the 

United States who are nationals and citizens of the 

United States at birth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Birthright Citizenship 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 301 IS

1 SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CERTAIN PERSONS 

2 BORN IN THE UNITED STATES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 301 of the Immigration 

4 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

6 ‘‘The following’’; 

7 (2) by redesignating subsections (a) through (h) 

8 as paragraphs (1) through (8), respectively, and in9 denting such paragraphs, as redesignated, an addi10 tional 2 ems to the right; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—Acknowledging the right of birth13 right citizenship established by section 1 of the 14th 

14 Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, a 

15 person born in the United States shall be considered ‘sub16 ject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States for purposes 

17 of subsection (a)(1) only if the person is born in the 

18 United States and at least 1 of the person’s parents is— 

19 ‘‘(1) a citizen or national of the United States; 

20 ‘‘(2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

21 residence in the United States whose residence is in 

22 the United States; or 

23 ‘‘(3) an alien performing active service in the 

24 armed forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, 

25 United States Code).’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 301 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a)(3) may not be construed to affect the citizen3 ship or nationality status of any person born before the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-35.1


(logo) Bank of America




ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE




OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION




Re: DBUBS 2011-LC3


Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates




In connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a review of the Servicing activities, for the period ending December 31, 2011 and of its performance under the Primary Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2011 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, National Association has fulfilled all of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.




Bank of America, National Association




/s/ Janice M. Smith


Janice M. Smith


Managing Director




/s/ H. Michael Lumadue


H. Michael Lumadue


Director
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EDAC Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended April 3, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Dominick A. Pagano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:      May 4, 2004              /s/ Dominick A. Pagano
                                     -----------------------------------
                                         Dominick A. Pagano
                                         Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EDAC Technologies Corporation and will be retained by EDAC
Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request
Order entered October ~)- , 2012

In The

No. 05-12-01139-CR

THOMAS VINCIE BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR09-1565

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEx. R. A~,~,. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever 1s earlier.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARIANELLA GUADAMUD, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellant,

vs. ELIZABETH GALANTUOMINI, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 83266 

# FILED
OCT 2 8 2021
ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OttUPREME COURT BY S DEPUTY CLE1 13- K

SUPREME COURT OP NEVRDA

i.0) 1447A aget. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing a complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nadia Krall, Judge. On October 12, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Within that order, this court deferred ruling on the parties' stipulation to remand this matter to the district court pursuant to Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79, 575 P.2d 585 (1978), and dismiss this appeal. Appellant has now filed a copy of an October 18, 2021, district court order certifying the district court's intent to grant relief from the order challenged on appeal under Huneycutt.

As stated in the October 12, 2021, order, it appears that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after the filing of a timely tolling motion in the district court but before entry of a written order finally resolving that tolling motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4); NRAP 4(a)(6). It thus appears no remand is necessary because the prematurely filed notice of appeal did not divest the district court of jurisdiction in this matter. NRAP 4(a)(6) (A premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction."). Nevertheless, given the entry of the district court's October

i -31 

### '8 718, 2021, order, the parties stipulation is approved insofar as it is seeks

dismissal of this appeal, and this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

C.J.

cc: Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge Michael H. Singer, Settlement Judge Law Office of Karen H. Ross Anderton & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

1Given this dismissal, appellant need not file a response to this court's October 12, 2021, order to show cause. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A 4119. 2
Abatement Order filed March 5, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00974-CV

____________

COOPER INDUSTRIES, LLC, ET AL, Appellant

V.

PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING CO., INC., ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-77606

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 18, 2018. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The record was not filed. On December 19, 2018, this court ordered 

official court reporter Gina Jackson to file the record within 30 days. When Jackson 

failed to file the record as ordered, on January 23, 2019 this court ordered her to file 

the record within 30 days. We cautioned her that if the record was not filed, the court 
2

would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for failure 

to file the record. The record has not been filed. 

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s 

record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the 80th District Court to conduct a hearing at which 

Gina Jackson, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to 

determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when 

the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether the court 

reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record 

timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s 

record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law 

and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental 

clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court by April 4, 2019. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the 

record before the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated, and the 

trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant
No. 87-1502.

#### Gordon *v.*Gordon.

Ct. App. Mo., Southern Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned is the CEO and President (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer) of Online Redefined, Inc.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Online Redefined, Inc. for the year ended December  31, 2012.  The undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Online Redefined, Inc. as of December 31, 2012.  This Certification is executed as of April 16, 20132.  /s/ Dan Faiman Dan Faiman CEO and President