alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.1
(logo) pwc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Bank of America, National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Assessment Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the
"Compliance Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed
securities transactions involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that
involved an offer or sale of asset-backed securities that were required to be
registered on or after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of
December 31, 2011 and for the year then ended, excluding the criteria which
the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities
performed by them with respect to the Platform, as indicated in Appendix A of
the Compliance Statement. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise
the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National
Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 for the Platform is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 27, 2012

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3600, Charlotte, NC 28202
T: (704) 344 7500, F: (704) 344 4100, www.pwc.com/us
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Cecil Ray King , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00193

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F15400 ). Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Rambin

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for
further proceedings.
We further order that the appell ee, t he State of Texas

, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 31 , 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD PATRIGNANI.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Rudd, Appellee, *v.*City of Reading, Appellant. Rudd et al., Appellants, *v.*City of Reading, Appellee.

(Decided February 19, 1940.)

*Mr. Wm. D. Schaeffer,*for the Rudds.

*Messrs. Barnhorn & Barnhorn,*for the city of Reading.

Hamilton, P. J.

These two cases are here on questions of law. They involve like questions and are presented and considered together.

*309The plaintiffs’ separate petitions claim damage to their property by the defendant, city of Beading, in the construction by the city of certain street improvements.

To the petitions, the defendant addressed motions to make definite and certain, which motions, in substance, were to require the plaintiffs to make their petitions definite and certain by setting forth the locations of their property with relation to the lines of the improvement, the date on which they became the owners of their specific pieces of property and the dimensions thereof, the width and location of the improvement, the date of the legislation to improve, and the construction of the improvement, which allegedly appropriates the property, and plaintiffs’ title and interest therein.

The trial court sustained the motions and amended petitions were filed, which did not comply with the court’s ruling and order. The plaintiffs refused to plead further, whereupon, the court entered final judgment in each case, dismissing the actions.

Plaintiffs argue that the court abused its discretion in entering final judgments against them.

The court, under authority > of Section 11336, General Code, may require the pleadings to be made definite and certain by amendment. This it did, and unless abuse of discretion is shown in its rulings on the motions and in the dismissal of the actions, the judgments must be sustained. Abuse of discretion by the court must be clearly shown. The greater part of the requirements under the motions were well within the knowledge of the plaintiffs, and would become pertinent in the cases, and no reason appears why plaintiffs refused to comply. In passing, it may be stated that the plaintiffs had recovered damages to the same property in other prior actions, which judgments for damages were sustained by this court.

Some authorities hold that the rulings of the trial *310court on such motions are conclusively presumed to be correct. It is not necessary to go that far in these cases, since we find that the rulings of the court are proper and reasonable and would place the plaintiffs at no disadvantage in their suits. See 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 860 *et seq.,*Section 275 *et seq.*

In dismissing the actions, the court took the only means possible to enforce its rulings. This power is inherent in the court as well as suggested in paragraph 5 of Section 11586, General Code. See also, *N.*Y., *C. & St. L. Rd. Co.*v. *Kistler,*66 Ohio St., 326, 64 N. E., 130; *Cincinnati, L. & N. Ry. Co.*v. *Shurts,*10 Ohio App., 226; 14 Ohio Jurisprudence, 333, Section 18.

The judgments are affirmed.

*Judgments affirmed.*

Matthews and Ross, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         180,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  777,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,435,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,606,000
<PP&E>                                          94,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,750,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,133,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,308,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,617,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,750,000
<SALES>                                     15,749,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,749,000
<CGS>                                       11,776,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,776,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (68,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                669,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   261,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            408,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       30<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       30
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes Of This Exhibit, Primary Means Basic
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 367 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the Medicare 

outpatient rehabilitation therapy caps. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal 

the Medicare outpatient rehabilitation therapy caps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Access to 

5 Rehabilitation Services Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OUTPATIENT THERAPY CAP REPEAL. 

7 Section 1833 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395(l)) is amended by striking subsection (g). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6109]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SENATE RESOLUTION 114--TO REFER S. 740 TO THE U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL 
                                 CLAIMS

  Mr. GORTON (for Mr. Hatch) submitted the following resolution; which 
was agreed to:

                              S. Res. 114

       Resolved, That the bill S. 740 entitled ``A bill for the 
     relief of Inslaw, Inc., and William A. Hamilton and Nancy 
     Burke Hamilton'' now pending in the Senate, together with all 
     the accompanying papers, is referred to the chief judge of 
     the United States Court of Federal Claims. The chief judge 
     shall proceed with the same in accordance with the provisions 
     of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code, 
     and report thereon to the Senate, at the earliest practicable 
     date, giving such findings of fact and conclusions thereon as 
     shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature and 
     character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable, 
     against the United States or a gratuity and the amount, if 
     any, legally or equitably due to the claimants from the 
     United States.
     

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

of Periodic Report
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Richard T. Allorto, Jr., certify that:

1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sierra Income Corporation (the Company);

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The Companys other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The Companys other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 14, 2013



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.                 
|Richard T. Allorto, Jr.                     
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### JERRY PATRIZIO v. NEW JERSEY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 CMSAF tours ICBM mission at Malmstrom AFBPublished Feb. 16, 2021
                        
                        By Senior Airman Tristan Truesdell & Lana O’Connor
                        
                        
                        341st Missile Wing Public Affairs
                **MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. (AFNS)  --**
                Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force **JoAnne S. Bass** visited the **341st Missile Wing** Feb. 9-10.
Selected as the 19th CMSAF, Bass made history as the first woman to serve as the highest-ranking noncommissioned member of a U.S. military service branch.
Bass met with the 341st MW Airmen during an all-call to discuss her priorities, Air Force administrative changes and to answer any questions they had for her. She emphasized the need for the Air Force to **accelerate change, or lose**. To achieve that, according to Bass, the Air Force must modernize to better compete, deter and win.
She also visited a missile alert facility to learn more about the intercontinental ballistic missile mission and to meet with the missileers, defenders, maintainers and missile chefs.
“When it comes to our nuclear mission and how it impacts our national defense, our **Air Force Global Strike Command** Airmen has a direct impact,” Bass said. “Our ICBM arsenal is critical in making sure adversaries think twice when it comes to considering any attack on our homeland, our allies and partners.
“It is an absolutely critical mission set for the United States Air Force,” she concluded.
As CMSAF, Bass is responsible for providing direction for the enlisted force while also serving as the personal adviser to the **chief of staff** and the **secretary** of the Air Force on all issues regarding the welfare, readiness, morale, proper utilization and progress of more than 600,000 Total Force Airmen.
Bass leads the enlisted side of the Air Force and is promoting the importance of people, readiness and culture.
In less than a year, Bass has accomplished significant changes within the Air Force with the latest change allowing women in the service to **wear their hair** in longer braids, ponytails and bangs; and **removing waist measurements** from composite scores in physical fitness assessments.
“It was an honor having Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Bass meet our Airmen,” said **Col. Anita Feugate-Opperman**, 341st Missile Wing commander. “We were excited to have her learn about the intercontinental ballistic missile mission and the people who make it happen every day and we’re grateful for her continued leadership.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



DV visit 



CMSAF 



JoAnne Bass 



Malmstrom AFB 



missileers 



One Air Force 



ICBM 



mission 



tour 



341st MW 



priorities 



accelerate change 



modernize 



readiness
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARY LOU NAVA, as next friend of §

ANGELA NAVA, a person with total No. 08-20-00049-CV

mental incapacity, §

Appeal from the

Appellant, §

41st District Court

v. §

of El Paso County, Texas

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. §

(TC# 2019-DCV-0910)

Appellee. §

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes 

no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4674]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      WE ARE NOT CUTTING MEDICARE

  (Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland. Mr. Speaker, I feel compelled to respond to 
the allegations that this budget cuts Medicare and cuts Medicaid; that 
just is not true. Just look at the budget, and look at the figures in 
the budget. Today every Medicare recipient, the average across the 
country, gets $4,700. At the end of this budget process that will have 
risen to $6,300. That is not a cut.
  What we are going to do is to preserve the Medicare system. It is now 
doomed unless one does something about it going bankrupt by 2002. We 
are not cutting Medicare. It will increase from $4,700 to $6,300 per 
every recipient; that is not a cut.
  Let me say it again: When you go from $4,700 to $6,300, that's not a 
cut.
  Please be productive. Please join us in this process to perfecting a 
budget that is going to save our country for our children. Do not 
continue with these misstatements of fact.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing by Aries Ventures Inc. (the "Company") of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
(the "Quarterly Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert
N. Weingarten, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  August 8, 2005                By:  ________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                                  VERITEC INC.
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned,  Van Thuy Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Veritec Inc.  (the  "Company")  has executed  this  Certification  in
connection  with the filing with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2003 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

the  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 20
day of May 2003.
                                        /s/ Van Thuy Tran
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Van Thuy Tran
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4934]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

  Mr. HANCOCK. Mr. Speaker, for the first time in over 6 years, I was 
out of town on personal business last Thursday and Friday, and missed a 
portion of the rollcall votes on H.R. 961. I ask that the Record 
reflect that had I been present, I would have voted in the following 
manner: ``No'' on rollcall votes 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, and 328; and 
``aye'' on rollcall votes 326, 327, and 329.

                          ____________________
```