alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.4 

PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	 $25,000,000.00
	 	October 14, 2014

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned GGT DANIEL SC VENTURE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of SYNOVUS BANK, a Georgia banking corporation (the “Bank”), the aggregate principal amount of the Construction Loan Advances (as defined below)
owing to Bank by Borrower pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement of even date herewith between Borrower and Bank (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”; capitalized terms used
herein as therein defined), together with interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Construction Loan Advances from the date of each such Construction Loan Advance until such principal amount is paid in full, at such interest rates, and payable
at such times, as are specified in the Credit Agreement. 
 This Promissory Note is the Construction Note referred to in, and is entitled to
the benefits of, the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement, among other things, (i) provides for the making of Advances of the Construction Loan (the “Construction Loan Advances”) by Bank in an aggregate amount not to exceed
at any time outstanding the U.S. dollar amount first above mentioned, the indebtedness resulting from such Construction Loan Advances to Borrower being evidenced by this Promissory Note, and (ii) contains provisions for acceleration of the
maturity hereof upon the happening of certain stated events and also for prepayments on account of principal hereof prior to the maturity hereof upon the terms and conditions therein specified. The obligations of Borrower under this Promissory Note
are secured by the Collateral as provided in the Loan Documents. 
 * * * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Promissory Note has been executed by the duly authorized
representative of Borrower as of the date first above written. 
  

							
	GGT DANIEL SC VENTURE, LLC,
	a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	DANIEL HAYWOOD, LLC,
		 	an Alabama limited liability company,
		 	its Operating Member
			
		 	By:	 	DANIEL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
		 		 	an Alabama corporation,
		 		 	its Manager
				
		 		 	By:	 	 R. Scott Pulliam

		 		 		 	R. Scott Pulliam,
		 		 		 	its Senior Vice President



  
 2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5089]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 THE CONTRACT'S CROWN JEWEL--TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH, BROKEN PROMISES TO 
                                SENIORS

  (Ms. DeLAURO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. DeLAURO Mr. Speaker, today the bill comes due for the 
Republican's tax giveaway to the privileged few, and the primary bill 
payers are senior citizens who will be hit with $288 billion in cuts to 
Medicare.
  The Speaker has called the Republican tax plan the crown jewel of the 
Contract With America.
  It is a crown jewel all right--if you are a large corporation that 
may not have to pay any taxes at all--if you are a billionaire 
expatriate who gives up your citizenship to avoid paying taxes--if you 
are making more than $350,000 and you are going to walk away with a 
$20,000 tax break.
  But if you are a senior citizen, get ready to pay up for that crown 
jewel. Your Medicare premiums and copayments are going up, and your 
benefits are being cut. Altogether the average senior should expect to 
pay $1,060 more in out-of-pocket expenses by the year 2002.
  Make no mistake about it, the Republican budget plan robs Medicare to 
pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. To keep their promise to 
the rich, the Republicans must break our most sacred promise to 
America's seniors.

                          ____________________
```
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 473

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV

No. CR-14-678

CALVIN TATUM

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered September 16, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE MONROE

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-2012-82]

HONORABLE RICHARD L.

PROCTOR, JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO

WITHDRAW GRANTED

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge

Appellant Calvin Tatum appeals from the Monroe County Circuit Court’s order

revoking his suspended imposition of sentence (SIS). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k), Tatum’s attorney has filed a

motion to be relieved as counsel on the basis that there is no merit to the appeal. The motion

is accompanied by a brief containing an abstract and addendum of the proceedings below.

The no-merit brief includes all objections and motions decided adversely to Tatum, and

counsel explains in the argument portion of the brief why there is nothing in the record that

would arguably support an appeal. The clerk of this court served Tatum with a copy of his

counsel’s brief and notified him of his right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal.

Tatum filed pro se points, and the State filed a response thereto. 

On October 23, 2012, Tatum pleaded guilty to second-degree battery, and the court
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 473

suspended imposition of his sentence for three years and ordered him to pay $400 in fines

and court costs. The State filed a petition to revoke the SIS on August 20, 2013, alleging that

Tatum had been arrested for, and charged with, sexual assault and rape and that he had failed

to make any payments on his fine. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded that Tatum

had violated at least one of the terms and conditions of his SIS and sentenced him to serve

six years in prison. 

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but

whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Pledger v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 317. From our

review of the record and the brief presented to us, and after having considered Tatum’s pro

se points for reversal, we agree with counsel that an appeal would be wholly without merit.

Because we find compliance with Rule 4-3(k), we affirm the order of revocation and grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. 

GLADWIN, C.J., and BROWN, J., agree. 

Robert M. “Robby” Golden, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of VII Peaks Co-Optivist
Income BDC II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Gurpreet S. Chandhoke, the Chief Executive Officer and President, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated this 16th day of July, 2015 | By: | /s/ Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                                                                            
|--------------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                  |     | Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                                                                                
|                                  |     | Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Air, Space & CyberPublished Sept. 20, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Braden Anderson
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE --**
                On this look around the Air Force, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein shares his outlook at the Air Force Association’s 2019 Air, Space and Cyber Conference. His speech focused on multi-domain operations and the future Air Force. </iframe  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:- 2019 Air, Space & Cyber Conference/Symposium- CSAF stresses multi-domain operationsAFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Airmen 



Air Force We Need 



AFWN 



multi-domain 



Strengthening Joint Leader & Teams 



develop exceptional leaders 



resilience 



Ready for Life 



Build a More Lethal Force 



SAF
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the annual period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) of VII Peaks Co-Optivist Income BDC II,
Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michelle
Kleier, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated this 16th day of July, 2015 | By: | /s/ Michelle Kleier                                           
|--------------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                                  |     | Michelle Kleier                                               
|                                  |     | Chief Financial Officer,                                      
|                                  |     | Treasurer and Secretary                                       
|                                  |     | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002 (the “PeriodicReport”), I, James P. Santelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                    ThePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                    Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company**.**

 
| Dated:  November 12, 2002 | /s/ JAMES P.  SANTELLI     |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                           | James P.  Santelli         |
|                           | Chief  Financial Officer   |
|                           | Digital  Angel Corporation |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Charles Campise, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ZaZa Energy Corporation;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 14, 2012

/s/
Charles Campise
Charles Campise Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
#### GERARD VALERIUS v. CITY OF NEWARK.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification granted. (See 168 *N.J.Super.*529)
[No. 17754-8-III.

Division Three.

May 9, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John S. Richards, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kittitas County, No. 97-1-00162-4, Michael E. Cooper, J., entered July 20, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Sweeney, J.
No. 87-1337.

#### Boersma, Personal Representative of the Estates of Boersma et al. *v.*Karnes, Nebraska State Tax Commissioner, et al. O. N. E. Shipping, Ltd. *v.*Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A., et al.

No. 87-1350.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Neb.; and C. A. 2d Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force improves assignment process for co-parents, considers custody agreementsPublished Aug. 5, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force recently announced great news for parents – the ability to defer an assignment or be stationed near their children with a court-ordered child custody decree.
Assignment authorities will now be able to consider requests for an assignment or deferment to a location near their children, even if the co-parents are not married.
“We recognize family dynamics don’t always look the same and there is not a one-size-fits-all solution to managing people’s careers and assignments,” said **Lt. Gen. Brian T. Kelly**, deputy chief of staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services. “We ask our people to move frequently and we know that can cause additional stress and sacrifices for their families. This change gives us the flexibility needed to better take care of them.”
Service members are still required to fill valid manning requirements, perform the duties in which they are trained, and meet all PCS eligibility requirements without waivers.
“This is one we’ve been working on for a while, and I’m glad we could get it across the finish line,” said **Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright**. “You know, this Air Force life is a family business. As such, we owe it to our teammates to make sure they have every opportunity to keep their family together whenever possible.”
Service members who are named as a parent, either biological or adopted, and have a court-ordered child custody agreement are eligible to apply. Assignment matches will be made when possible, and must meet the best needs of the Department of the Air Force.
Criteria for court-ordered child custody assignments and deferments vary, so consult the new Air Force Guidance Memorandum **AFI 36-2110** for details.
In order to apply, Airmen can submit their application through **myPers** beginning Aug.17. Instructions are outlined in the PSD Guide, Voluntary Assignments: CCCA/CCCD.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Parents 



co-parents 



custody 



agreement 



improve 



assignment 



process 



family 



children 



CMSAF 



Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force 



Kaleth O. Wright 



PCS 



AFWN
[No. 23893-4-II.

Division Two.

March 31, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Samuel Bassett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 94-1-00531-8, Terry D. Sebring, J., entered September 17, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Armstrong, A.C.J., and Morgan, J.
EX-35.6
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA

CMBS Department
MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414

March 28, 2012

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
Attn: Kiernan W. Pusey
1585 Broadway, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10036

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C3

Pursuant to section 13.9 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
October 1, 2011, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., ("Wells Fargo", as Custodian), hereby certifies as follows for the
calendar year 2011:

a. a review of such Custodian activities during the preceding calendar year and
of such Custodian performance under this Agreement, or the applicable sub
servicing agreement or primary servicing agreement in the case of an
Additional Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

b. to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Custodian
has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or the applicable sub
servicing agreement or primary servicing agreement in the case of an
Additional Servicer, in all material respects throughout such year.


Certified By:
/s/ Kathleen Marshall
Kathleen Marshall
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 302 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a Federal 

election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make 

voting in a Federal election by an unlawfully present 

alien an aggravated felony and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voter Integrity Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNLAWFUL VOTING. 

7 (a) AGGRAVATED FELONY.—Paragraph (43) of sec8 tion 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended— 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 302 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (T), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (U), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(V) an offense described in section 611 of 

7 title 18, United States Code, committed by an 

8 alien who is unlawfully present in the United 

9 States.’’. 

10 (b) DEPORTABLE OFFENSE.—Paragraph (2) of sec11 tion 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

12 U.S.C. 1227(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(G) VOTING OFFENSES.—Any alien who 

15 is unlawfully present in the United States and 

16 who knowingly commits a violation of section 

17 611 of title 18, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 AFWERX is smart risk for innovative solutionsPublished Jan. 12, 2018
                        
                        By Master Sgt. Heidi West
                        
                        
                        99th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS)  --**
                Historically, the Air Force has remained the world’s preeminent air and space fighting force by forging innovators from within the ranks, empowering them to problem solve and providing them the resources to do so.Today, the Air Force is formally expanding this call for innovation through the AFWERX program, which encourages partnerships with academic institutions, science and technology communities and private industries with an invested interest in solving complex security issues.According to Air Force leadership, the secretary of the Air Force established the AFWERX program to facilitate the integration and implementation of creative and disruptive technology to ensure today’s Airmen maintain the capability advantage over tomorrow’s adversary.“Airmen are the ones closest to the problems, the people at the tip of the spear, who understand the problems, who understand the enemy, and have the ideas to make us more lethal,” said Capt. Steven Lauver, AFWERX Air Force Technology Accelerator co-director. “It all exists with the people who are there solving the problems on the battlefield. Innovation is important because we are taking the people who understand our problems and enabling them to solve them.”Private industries are moving exponentially faster than the Defense Department in autonomous technology. Recruiting innovative solutions from these outside resources requires the Air Force to take a chance before the technology becomes obsolete, Lauver said.“It’s a higher risk not to act than to act,” Lauver said. “If we don’t begin executing on the innovation conversation then we are going to fall behind on a global scale.”AFWERX is the first step in furthering that conversation. Each AFWERX facility will serve as an innovation hub to bring tools and resources together in physical, open, “first stop” public access points. The goal of the program is to create a mutually-beneficial partnership with innovators and entrepreneurs to generate technology at an accelerated rate, Air Force leadership said.“When people’s lives are on the line, and time is of the essence, you have to be willing to take those smart risks to solve problems quickly,” Lauver said. “Right now, there is an appetite to try new things and implement new technologies and new solutions to make us better on the battlefield.”nellis afb 



AFwerX 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Heather Wilson 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



SecAF 



innovation 



academic institutions 



science 



technology 



partnership 



community 



problem solving 



solutions 



Air Force Technology Accelerator