alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:
1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee.
Date:  March 26, 2012
/s/ Brian T. Stevens

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven P.
Wyandt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Nitches, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended February 29, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Nitches, Inc.

|Date: April 24,
      2008
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ Steven P. Wyandt      

Steven P. Wyandt Chief Executive
Officer

This certification is furnished pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Nitches, Inc. for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in to any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Nitches, Inc.
specifically incorporates it by reference.

27

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4901]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                REPUBLICAN BUDGET DOES NOT CUT MEDICARE

  (Mr. HASTERT asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. HASTERT. Mr. Speaker, for the last few days, liberal Democrats 
have taken to the floor to denounce so-called Medicare cuts.
  What cuts?
  Where are they?
  This chart clearly shows that under the House Republican budget, 
Medicare funding will increase.
  This year, we will spend over $150 billion on Medicare.
  This will not decrease.
  Let me be absolutely clear about this--Medicare funding will not 
decrease.
  Under the House Republican plan, Medicare spending will have 
increased to about $230 billion by the year 2002.
  Let me say that again--Medicare spending will be $230 billion in the 
year 2002. Now, if Medicare spending is $150 billion this year and $230 
billion seven years from now, that is an increase in Medicare spending. 
Where's the cut?
  Only in Washington could an increase be a cut.
  Well, the American people are tired of the old Washington accounting 
methods. Those methods are the very reason we have a $5 trillion debt.
  Republicans are committed to scrapping the old Washington accounting 
methods and replacing them with the truth, something not often seen 
around here.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 18085-9-III.

Division Three.

May 23, 2000.]

#### Ronald Dicus, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Natural Resources, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 97-2-00286-3, Linda G. Tompkins, J., entered November 13, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Brown, JJ.
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2921 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2014 

Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home 

Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lane A. Evans 

VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2921 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. LANE A. EVANS VA COMMUNITY BASED OUT2 PATIENT CLINIC. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community based outpatient 

4 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 

5 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Lane A. Evans VA Commu7 nity Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

9 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the community based outpatient clinic referred 

11 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

12 the ‘‘Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient 

13 Clinic’’. 

Passed the Senate December 3, 2014. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[No. 44126-4-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Timothy Wade McCracken, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Island County, No. 98-1-00015-6, Alan R. Hancock, J., entered February 9, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[No. 44985-1-I.

Division One.

April 3, 2000.]

#### Northwest Health Services, *Respondent,*v. Great Republic Life Insurance Company, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-06092-1, Suzanne Marie Barnett, J., entered May 28 and June 7, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Grosse and Cox, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 07, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A1649. RAI INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, LLC v. CONCEPT STEEL, INC..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 10.7

 

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

 

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) dated as of October 14, 2014, by and among First Line Capital, LLC (“Consultant”) and DarkStar Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

W I T N E S S E T H

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto are parties to a Consulting Agreement dated as of September 2011 (the “Consulting Agreement”; capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Consulting Agreement); and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend certain terms of the Consulting Agreement as provided for in this Amendment;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1. Extension. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Consulting Agreement to the contrary, the Company and the Consultant hereby agree and acknowledge that the Consulting Agreement shall terminate and have no further force and effect on July 31, 2015.

 

2. Services. Given the status of the Company as a shell company, the Consultant agrees to use its best efforts to locate a suitable acquisition candidate for the Company.

 

3. Reference. On and after the date hereof, each reference in the Consulting Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of like import, and each reference to the Consulting Agreement in any other agreement, document or other instrument, shall mean, and be a reference to the Consulting Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.

 

5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and by facsimile or other electronic transmission, and all of said counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

 

6. Captions. The captions used in this Amendment are intended for convenience of reference only, shall not constitute any part of this Amendment and shall not modify or affect in any manner the meaning or interpretation of any of the provisions of this Amendment.

 

7. Governing Law. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties under this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflict of laws rules applied in such state.

 

 

	1
	







	





 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their respective hands to be set hereto with the intention of being bound effective in all respects as of the date and year first hereinabove written.

  

	DARKSTAR VENTURES, INC.	 	FIRST LINE CAPITAL, LLC	 
						
	By: 	/s/ Chizkyau Lapin 	 	By:	/s/ Daniel Hirsch	 
	Name:	Chizkyau Lapin 	 	Name:	Daniel Hirsch	 
	Title: 	President, CEO and CFO	 	Title:	Managing Partner	 


  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2
[No. 43772-1-I.

Division One.

April 3, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kimberley Ann Talley, *Defendant,*Steven Eckman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-1-07220-8, Ann Schindler, J., entered November 23, 1998. *Affirmed,*by unpublished opinion per Agid, C.J., concurred in by Webster and Cox, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS E. FARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,

District Judge. (CR-03-212)

Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: July 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne,

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENER, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Stephanie L.

Haines, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

In February 2004, Thomas E. Farris pled guilty to mail

theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708 (2000), and was sentenced

to twelve months in prison followed by three years of supervised

release. On September 23, 2004, Farris was released from prison

and began serving his term of supervised release. On December 20,

2004, Farris appeared before the district court on a motion for

revocation filed by his probation officer citing commission of a

crime, failing to inform probation of an arrest, and excessively

using alcohol. Farris disputed the claim that he committed a

crime. The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence

that Farris had, in fact, stolen a wallet. The court revoked

Farris’ supervised release and sentenced him to eighteen months in

prison followed by six months of supervised release. We affirm.

We review a district court’s decision to revoke a

defendant’s supervised release for an abuse of discretion. United

States v. Copley, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). The district

court need only find a violation of a condition of supervised

release by a preponderance of the evidence. 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 3583(e)(3) (West 2000 & Supp. 2004). This Court reviews factual

determinations informing the conclusion that a violation occurred

for clear error. United States v. Carothers, 337 F.3d 1017, 1019

(8th Cir. 2003); United States v. Whalen, 82 F.3d 528, 532 (1st

Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
- 3 -

error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decision process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,536,548               2,536,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,083,516               2,083,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (226,094)               (226,094)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,019,958               3,019,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,567,023               7,567,023
<PP&E>                                       1,248,690               1,248,690
<DEPRECIATION>                               (671,061)               (671,061)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,167,035               8,167,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,917,370               1,917,370
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,341,623               2,341,623
<COMMON>                                     9,387,718               9,387,718
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,504,672)             (5,504,672)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,167,035               8,167,035
<SALES>                                      2,750,342               7,643,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,750,342               7,643,554
<CGS>                                        1,722,843               5,057,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,722,843               5,057,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,635,203               4,929,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (10,019)                (27,471)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (597,685)             (2,315,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (597,685)             (2,315,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (597,685)             (2,315,904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.06)                 $(0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.06)                 $(0.27)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  VERITEC INC.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned, Van Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Veritec Inc. (the "Company"), individually, has executed this
Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarterly ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      The undersigned hereby certifies that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of
the 19th day of November, 2003.

                                                  /s/    Van Tran
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Van Tran
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                       16
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Luke Edward Badura

, * From the 26 6th District

Court of Erath County,

Trial Court No. CR13447

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 001 66

- CR * June 1 3, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[No. 23845-4-II.

Division Two.

April 28, 2000.]

#### Betty A. Mallory, *Respondent,*v. J.B. Trucking, Inc., et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 95-2-00965-1, Richard D. Hicks, J., entered September 18, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, A.C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Houghton, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55617-55618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22821]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2010-0002]

Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

DATE:  Week of September 13, 2010.

PLACE:  Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.

STATUS:  Public and Closed.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

[[Page 55618]]

Week of September 13, 2010

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

8:45 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).
    a. Final Update of the Commission's Waste Confidence Decision 
(Tentative).
* * * * *
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--
(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, 
(301) 415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Angela Bolduc, Chief, 
Employee/Labor Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301-492-2230, TDD: 
301-415-2100, or by e-mail at [email protected]. 
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an e-mail to [email protected].

    Dated: September 8, 2010.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22821 Filed 9-9-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
[No. 1581.]

#### Henry Mangum *v.*The State.

Carrying Pistol—Evidence.—See the opinion *in extenso*for facts *held*insufficient to establish the carrying of deadly weapons, as that offense is defined by statute.

Appeal from the District Court of Trinity. Tried below before the Hon. J. E. Kennard.

The opinion discloses the case.

*Robb & Stevenson*and *Denson*<& *Burnett,*for the appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

*363Opinion delivered February 2, 1884.

Hurt, Judge.

Henry Mangum was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and was fined twenty-five dollars.

Defendant and others were on their way to church, when defendant found-the pistol in the road, got down, picked it up and knocked the dirt from it, put it in his pocket and went on to church, but did not go into the church building. After church, defendant, accompanied by Charlie Hodge, went to Mr. Fussel’s, who lived about one-half mile from the church. While there the State’s witness (Fussel being the only witness for the State) says that on a Sunday in March or April, 1883, defendant was at his house, sitting in a chair; witness heard something fall, looked and saw a pistol under the chair of the defendant. Defendant put his hat over the pistol. Witness went into another room, and upon returning the pistol was gone.

Do the above facts show a violation of the law? Does the penal law of this State prohibit and punish a citizen for finding a pistol and carrying it to his house? We think not. A party may so carry a found pistol as to be guilty of a. violation of the Code, but certainly the facts of this case are not such as to warrant such a conclusion.

The facts do not support the judgment, and for this reason it must be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed! and remanded.*