alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. ARTHUR DEIKE.1

January 16, 1920.

No. 21,567.

Bastard — verdict sustained.

1. In an action to determine the paternity of an illegitimate child the evidence is *JieXcl*to sustain the verdict.

Corroboration of mother’s testimony unnecessary.

2. Evidence in corroboration of the mother on the question of paternity in such cases is not necessary.

Action in the municipal court of Redwood Falls to -determine the paternity of an illegitimate child. The case was tried before Converse, J., judge of the First judicial district sitting in place of the judge of the Ninth judicial district, by order of the Governor of the state, and a jury which found defendant guilty as charged in the complaint. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*A. B. A. Laudon, John A. Dalzell*and *Arthur L. II. Street,*for appellant.

*Clifford L. Hilton,*Attorney General, *James E. Markham,*Assistant Attorney General and *Albert H. Enersen,*County Attorney, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 175 N. W. 1000.

Brown, C. J.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the verdict is so clearly and manifestly against the evidence as to call for interference by this court. *We*answer it in the negative.

The issue in the case, the-paternity of complainant’s illegitimate child, was closely contested on the trial below, and the cause is presented in this court by counsel for defendant with much earnestness and eloquence, and in the evident good-faith belief in his innocence. But neither eloquence nor earnestness of counsel can be permitted to supplant the cold fact, disclosed by the record, that complainant gave direct and positive evi*454dence of the guilt of defendant, which if believed by the jury and trial court was sufficient without corroboration to justify the verdict of g'uilty. While it is true that defendant explicitly disputed the evidence of complainant, and presented other evidence by way of an alibi, yet the evidence as a whole presented a question of veracity between complainant and defendant, presenting an issue of fact for the jury. State v. Foster, 141 Minn. 140, 169 N. W. 529.

So far as the record discloses the trial was eminently a fair one, and the criticisms of counsel, aimed at the memorandum of the trial judge appended to the order denying a new trial, are without substantial support.

Order affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 7 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk Febr uary 7 , 2018

15 6 9 06 ( 92 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 6 9 06

v COA: 331466

Jackson CC: 14

- 004531

- FC

WILLIE EDDIE ANDERSON

, II

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice

, the motion of defendant

- appellant for permission to

file a pro per supplement to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The

supplement submitted on February 1, 2018, is accepted for filing.
Exhibit
10.3


 


Labor
Contract


 

This labor contract is based on the People’s Republic China’s labor law and
labor contract law and other related laws and regulations.





 


Employer:
Jilin Huamei Beverage Co. Ltd.


 


Employer’s
address: RM1607 Zhongji Building 1562 Jiefang Great Road, Changchun City, Jilin, China 


 


Legal
Representative: Liu,Changzhen


 


Employee:
Cai, Xiaohua


 


Gender:
Male


 


Employee’s
ID Number: 320626196505180034


 


Employee’s
address: Chaoyang district Beijing city


 


I. Contract Period & Probation Period


 


Both
parties agreed to choose __1__ for the employment terms


		1.	Fixed
                                         contract period:From February 2, 2014 to February 1,2017.
		2.	No
                                         fixed contract period: From__________year_______month_______day
		3.	By
                                         Project : From _______________to completion



 


II
Job Description & Job Location


 


CMO



 


III
Working Hours & Time Off


 


Both
parties agreed to choose _1_as working hours


		1.	Standard
                                         full time
		2.	Non
                                         Standard hours
		3.	Combined
                                         hours



 


IV
Remuneration



By consensus, both parties confirm the wage is __¥10,000.00__ a month. Payment
should be in monetary form and full payment of the monthly wages shall be delivered by the _the last_ day of the month.
Employer shall not unjustifiably deduct or delay in paying the wages. The monthly wage shall not less than the minimum wage implemented
by the city. 







    	 



     

    



V Social Insurance and Labor benefits




In accordance with central government, state, provincial and municipal policies and regulations




VI Labor conditions and labor protection against occupational hazards 



In accordance with central government, state and provincial requirements relating to the
implementation of occupational safety and health 



VII Termination & Renew of the Labor Contract





Both
parties observe the central government, state and provincial regulations regarding the termination of the labor contract. Unless
the violation is expressly stipulated by state, either party in violation of the contract will be subject to the payment of appropriate
compensation for breach of contract.



This contract is effective from the date signed by both parties,




 


Employer:
Jilin Huamei Beverage Co.,Ltd.


 


Legal Representative:
Liu,Changzhen Date: 02-02-2014


 


Employee:
Cai,Xiaohua Date: 02-02-2014


 


Governing
Authority: Changchun City Employment Service (with seal)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6802]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

  At 2:11 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Mr. Hays, one of its reading clerks, announced that pursuant to the 
provisions of section 4355(a) of title 10, United States Code, the 
Speaker appoints the following Members as members of the Board of 
Visitors to the United States Military Academy on the part of the 
House: Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Hefner, and Mr. 
Laughlin.
  The message further announced that pursuant to the provisions of 
section 6968(a) of title 10, United States Code, the Speaker appoints 
the following Members as members of the Board of Visitors to the United 
States Naval Academy on the part of the House: Mr. Skeen, Mr. 
Gilchrest, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Mfume.
  The message also announced that pursuant to the provisions of section 
5(b) of Public Law 93-642, the Speaker appoints the following Members 
as members of the Board of Trustees of the Harry S Truman Scholarship 
Foundation on the part of the House: Mr. Emerson and Mr. Skelton.
  The message further announced that pursuant to the provisions of 
section 1505 of Public Law 99-498, the Speaker appoints the following 
Members as members of the Board of Trustees of the Institute of 
American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development on the 
part of the House: Mr. Young of Alaska and Mr. Kildee.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 4.35


English Translation for Reference


 


Power
of Attorney


 


I, Lai Fulin, a citizen
of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as “China”), with the Chinese ID card number:
[Redacted], am a shareholder of Shenzhen PGW Seeds Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “PGW Seeds”), holding
5% equity interest of PGW Seeds. I hereby irrevocably authorize Mr. GUANGLIN LAI to exercise the following rights within the term
of this Power of Attorney:


 


I authorize Mr. GUANGLIN
LAI (passport number: [Redacted]) to represent me with full power to exercise any shareholder’s rights, including voting
rights, to which I shall be entitled under the laws of China and the Articles of Association of PGW Seeds at shareholders’
meetings of PGW Seeds, including but without limited to execute legal documents in relation to the sale or transfer of all or part
of my equity interest in PGW Seeds, and to act as my authorized representative at shareholders’ meetings of PGW Seeds to
designate and appoint a general manager of PGW Seeds.


 


The above authorization
and designation are conditional upon Mr. GUANGLIN LAI being a director of Agria Brother Biotech (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter
referred to as “Agria Brother”) and Agria Brother granting its consent to the above authorization and designation.
Once Mr. GUANGLIN LAI leaves Agria Brother or Agria Brother notifies me of the termination of the above authorization and designation,
I will immediately withdraw the authorization and designation made herein, and will designate and authorize any other personnel
nominated by Agria Brother to exercise all my shareholder’s rights, including voting rights, to which I shall be entitled
at shareholders’ meetings of PGW Seeds.


 


During the validly
existing period of PGW Seeds, except for the early termination of the Exclusive Call Option Contract jointly signed by me, Agria
Brother and PGW Seeds for any reasons, this Power of Attorney shall remain effective throughout the operating period of PGW Seeds
from the date hereof.


 


	 	/s/ Lai Fulin
	 	 
	 	March 13, 2013
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6509]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

  At 4:18 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Mr. Hays, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
passed the following bill, in which it requests the concurrence of the 
Senate:

       H.R. 1361. An act to authorize appropriations for fiscal 
     year 1996 for the Coast Guard, and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
#### J. F. Kelly et al. v. W. H. Belcher.

(No. 1276, Op. Book No. 2, p. 392.)

Appeal from Coryelle County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1126. *Continuance; nunc pro tunc order; injunction; costs.*Appellants enjoined appellee, tbe sheriff, from collecting certain taxes for the payment of school teachers. After the parties had gone into the trial of the case, appellee discovered that no order had been entered upon the minutes of the commissioners’ court levying the tax. Upon the discovery of this fact the court permitted appellee to withdraw the case from the jury and continue it. Thereafter the commissioners’ court entered the order levying the tax *nunc pro*tunc, and upon trial of the cause by the judge the injunction was dissolved and judgment rendered against the plaintiffs for the costs. *Held,*1. It was within the discretion of the court to permit the withdrawal of the case from the jury and to continue it, and this discretion is not the subject of revision. 2. A very great latitude has been permitted to courts in making entries *nunc pro tunc,*and it has been held that where an execution had issued, and a sale of property had been made thereunder, though there was no judgment to support it, that the entry subsequently of a judgment *nunc pro tunc*validated the proceeding. But generally judgments *nunc pro tunc*will not be entered unless there is something in the record by which it can be known that in fact the judgment was rendered. In this case there seems to have been no entry or minute from which it could be determined in fact that the commissioners’ court had levied the tax. It rested only in the memory of the commissioners and their officers. In a matter of so much importance it is not to be expected that reliance should be placed upon their fallible recollection. Our Revised Statutes permit the amendment of judgments and decrees after the term, but that is only where there is something in the record to amend by. *637The order of the commissioners’ court could only have been legally entered upon like conditions. Entered as it was, it did not have the effect of an amendment or valid *nunc pro tunc*order. It did not relate back so as to make legal proceedings had before it was rendered. [Freeman on Judgments, 67; 18 Maine, 183.] But it was doubtless a valid levy of the tax, and operative from the time when it was in fact entered. At the time of trial it was in full force, and required the sheriff to proceed to collect the tax. It was proper, therefore, to dissolve the injunction. The injunction was properly issued, but the entry of the legal decree for the levy of the tax in the meantime required also that it should be dissolved. 3. The plaintiffs should have recovered their costs, but no complaint is made on that ground; and as this was an equitable proceeding, costs were at the discretion of the court.

May 14, 1881.

Affirmed.
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
[No. 17794-7-III.

Division Three.

April 20, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rodney A. Marcum, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 98-1-00261-5, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered August 21, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Schultheis, J.
Exhibit 32.2

   

   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

   

   

   In connection with the annual report of Energizer Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

   

   Dated:August 31, 2016

   

   /s/ Michael Hawkins

   Michael Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer

   (Principal Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, John A. Ingleman, Chief Financial Officer of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hutchinson TechnologyIncorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date February 3 , 2005                                                        /s/ John A. Ingleman   John A. Ingleman   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[No. 45295-9-I.

Division One.

May 15, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. J.H., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-8-03208-1, Marsha J. Pechman, J., entered September 15, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     276,309
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           280,011   
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             280,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,028
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     6,554
<OTHER-SE>                                 705,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               280,011 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,852
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
                               

</TABLE>
EX-35.5


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent (in such capacities, "Wells Fargo"),
hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2012
(the "reporting period"):


(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule
B.



August 21, 2013


/s/Julie Eichler
Julie Eichler
Vice President


(page)


To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A


List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2011 by and among
DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A
DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Pooled Special Servicer, WELLS
FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Providence Place Mall Loan Special
Servicer, and U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and TRIMONT REAL
ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the Series
DBUBS 2011-LC3 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates


(page)


To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN MAGUIRE.

Jan. 7, 1980.

Petition for certification to Superior Court, Resentencing Panel — Essex County granted.