alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 24397-1-II.

Division Two.

May 19, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Wiley Allen Wheeler, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 98-1-00998-2, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered February 25, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Morgan and Bridgewater, JJ.
---

Exhibit 99.10

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michel Dumas, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of Tembec Inc. (the Company) , hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | a. | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended September 28, 2013 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | b. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    

Date: December 16, 2013

By: (s) Michel
DumasName: Michel DumasTitle: Executive Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Exhibit 32.1
Correspondence Filing

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

     In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission of National Diversified Services, Inc.'s (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that (i) in our capacities as officers of
the Company, (ii) to each of our own respective actual knowledge, and (iii)
solely for the purpose of compliance with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     The above certification is given as of the date of the Report and is
limited to the periods covered by the Report.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on
November 11, 2003.

                                                    By:        /s/Morry F. Rubin
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                                    By:       /s/ Morry F. Rubin
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                       14
#### Ft. Worth & Denver City R’y Co. v. J. Y. Hogsett et al.

(No. 2641, Op. Book No. 4, p. —.)

Appeal from Wise County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ *Mi. Condemnation of land for right of ivay of railroad.*On the 20th day of February, 1882, appellant filed a petition with the county judge of Wise county against J. Y. Hogsett and Smith county, alleging that the line of appellant’s road had been laid out and located over and through a tract of land in Wise county described as follows: “ Being survey or headlight in the name of Smith county for seventy-one million seven hundred and ninety-five thousand nine hundred and fifty-three square varas, and situated about nine miles southeast from the town of Decatur, and patented to Smith county school commissioners February 23, A. D. 1873, No. 372, vol. 22, abstract *7ii,*and said line as located and to be constructed enters said tract of land on its southern boundary, and running in a northerly direction passes out of said tract of land on the northern boundary line of the same, and *201embraces a width as shown by plat hereto attached, marked Exhibit A on each side of the center line of said railway as located.” Attached to the petition was a plat, but it did not give any boundaries of the land nor show where the line of road entered the land or ran out of it, nor the courses it ran.

June 2, 1883.

Amongst other matters defendant Hogsett filed an exception or demurrer to the award and the petition, “Because neither the petition or the award contained sufficient description of the land sought to be condemned, on account of which he asked that the proceeding be dismissed. ”

This exception was overruled by the court, and is assigned as error. *Held,*under article 4182, Eev. Stats., and the case of the G. H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. Mud Creek and I. A. & M. Co., *ante,*p. 169, the exception was well taken and should have been sustained.

Eeversed and dismissed.
Exhibit 10.10

 

Summary of Fluor Corporation Non-Management Director Compensation

 

Cash Compensation

 

	
Annual Retainer:
    	
 
    	
$
    	
 
    	
115,000
    	
 
    
	
Annual Committee Chair Retainer:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Audit Committee Chair:
    	
 
    	
$
    	
 
    	
20,000
    	
 
    
	
Organization and Compensation Committee Chair:
    	
 
    	
$
    	
 
    	
15,000
    	
 
    
	
Governance Committee Chair:
    	
 
    	
$
    	
 
    	
15,000
    	
 
    
	
Lead Independent Director Retainer:
    	
 
    	
$
    	
 
    	
30,000
    	
 
    


 

Retainers are paid quarterly in cash and can be deferred at the director’s election under the Fluor Corporation 409A Deferred Directors’ Fees Program (the “Deferred Fees Program”). Effective January 1, 2013, directors no longer receive a 25% premium on the deferred amount deemed invested in company stock via the deferred compensation program.

 

Equity Compensation

 

Each non-management director receives an annual grant of restricted stock and restricted units with a total market value of $135,000. The grant is made on the date of the annual meeting of shareholders. Restrictions on annual grants vest immediately on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Beginning at the annual meeting in 2015, directors will receive their stock grant entirely in restricted units and will be able to defer such units at their election under the Deferred Fees Program.

 

Other Information

 

Fluor Corporation reimburses non-management directors for their travel and related expenses in connection with attending Board meetings and Board-related activities. Directors also receive life insurance ($75,000 in coverage) and business travel accident insurance ($250,000 in coverage). Directors’ charitable contributions that meet the guidelines of the Company’s employee charitable matching gift program are eligible for matching funds from the Company in an amount up to $5,000 per year.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [NRC-2010-0002]

# DATE:

 Week of September 13, 2010.

# PLACE:

 Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

# STATUS:

 Public and Closed.

# ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED:

      ( print page 55618)    

## Week of September 13, 2010

### Wednesday, September 15, 2010

8:45 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).

a. Final Update of the Commission's Waste Confidence Decision (Tentative).

* * * * *

*The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)—(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415-1651.

* * * * *

                    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at:                     *http://www.nrc.gov/​about-nrc/​policy-making/​schedule.html.*

* * * * *

                    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (                    *e.g.*                     braille, large print), please notify Angela Bolduc, Chief, Employee/Labor Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301-492-2230, TDD: 301-415-2100, or by e-mail at                     *angela.bolduc@nrc.gov.  mailto:dlc@nrc.gov.mailto:aks@nrc.gov*                     Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.                

* * * * *

                    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an e-mail to                     *darlene.wright@nrc.gov.*

Dated: September 8, 2010.

Rochelle C. Bavol,

Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-22821 Filed 9-9-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN MELVIN FOSTER, JR.,

 

 Appellant.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00181-CR

Appeal from

112th District Court

of Reagan County, Texas 

(TC# 02013)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

December 2, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Engineered Support
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30,
2005 (the "Report"), I, Gary C. Gerhardt, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1) The Report complies with Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
             Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

Date: June 9, 2005
      ------------

By: /s/ Gary C. Gerhardt
   ------------------------
   Gary C. Gerhardt
   Vice Chairman and Chief
   Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and will be retained by
Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4905]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Oregon [Mr. DeFazio] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. DeFAZIO addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### David Ashworth *et al. versus J.*M. Wrigley.

Oct. Term, 1828.

Where the defendant has obtained a discharge under the act “ to abolish imprisonment for debt,” after the commencement of the suit, the plaintiff will be permitted to discontinue without costs,though the defendant, relying upon a defence to the/onn of the plaintiff’s action, offers to waive Ins discharge.

*Mr. D. Graham,*for the plaintiffs in this cause, moved for leave to discontinue without costs, thé defendant having since the commencement of the suit, obtained a discharge under the insolvent act. [Laws N. *Y.vol. 5. sess.*42. p. 115.]

The motion was opposed by *Mr. Ketcham,*for the defendant, upon the ground that the motive for discontinuing, was not founded upon the discharge, but upon the fact, that the action had been commenced in such a way, that it could not be sustained. The plaintiffs’ true remedy, he said, was by an action of account; but they had brought assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered, which could not be maintained.

The defendant, relying upon the defence presented by the form of action, was ready to waive the discharge altogether, and would stipulate not, to interpose it as a defence in any shape.

*Per Curiam.*

The motion must prevail as a matter of course, and is always granted by the Supreme Court in like cases. The only doubt originates in the defendant’s offer, to waive Ms discharge : but it does not appear, that he has any defence to the action, except as to its form. The court will not,' therefore, drive the plaintiff to the expense of a litigation, which can never draw in question the real merits between the parties. - ’

*Motion granted****

[D. Graham, Jun, *atty for the plffs.*Ketcham & Fessenden, *attys. for the*defts.]

*

*Vide Honeywell v. Burns,*8 *Cow.*121. *Merritt ads. Arden,*1 *Wm.*91.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 355 

To require the United States Trade Representative to notify the World Trade 

Organization if any member of the World Trade Organization fails during 

2 consecutive years to disclose subsidies under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the United States Trade Representative to notify 

the World Trade Organization if any member of the 

World Trade Organization fails during 2 consecutive 

years to disclose subsidies under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 355 IS

1 SECTION 1. MANDATORY DISCLOSURE BY THE UNITED 

2 STATES IF MEMBERS OF THE WORLD TRADE 

3 ORGANIZATION FAIL TO DISCLOSE SUB4 SIDIES UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON SUB5 SIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Trade Rep7 resentative shall— 

8 (1) review each notification of subsidies sub9 mitted under Article 25 of the Agreement on Sub10 sidies and Countervailing Measures by a member of 

11 the World Trade Organization with which the 

12 United States maintains a material and persistent 

13 trade deficit; 

14 (2) identify any such member that, for 2 con15 secutive years— 

16 (A) fails to submit such a notification; or 

17 (B) omits information or includes inac18 curate information in such a notification that is 

19 material with respect to the totality of the sub20 sidies of the member; and 

21 (3) notify the Committee on Subsidies and 

22 Countervailing Measures under such Article 25 of 

23 the subsidies of a member identified under para24 graph (2) not later than 180 days after— 

25 (A) in the case of a member identified 

26 under paragraph (2)(A), the date on which the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 355 IS

1 second notification not submitted by the mem2 ber was required to be submitted; or 

3 (B) in the case of a member identified 

4 under paragraph (2)(B), the date of the sub5 mission of the second notification in which the 

6 information was omitted or the inaccurate in7 formation was included, as the case may be. 

8 (b) AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND COUNTER9 VAILING MEASURES DEFINED.—The term ‘‘Agreement on 

10 Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’’ means the Agree11 ment on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures referred 

12 to in section 101(d)(12) of the Uruguay Round Agree13 ments Act (19 U.S.C. 3511(d)(12)). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5085]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has examined the Journal of the 
last day's proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.
  Mr. HOKE. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to clause 1, rule I, I demand a vote 
on agreeing to the Speaker's approval of the Journal.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the Chair's approval of 
the Journal.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the ayes appeared to have it.
  Mr. HOKE. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a 
quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum is not 
present.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, further 
proceedings on this motion will be postponed until later this 
afternoon.
  The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.
  

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 10.5_Dickey






Exhibit 10.5




October 27, 2014


Mr. Robert Dickey IV
320 West Mermaid Lane
Philadelphia, PA  19118
Dear Rob:
This letter agreement when fully executed shall serve as an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the employment agreement dated as of August 16, 2013 and entered into between you and the “Company” (the “Original Agreement”) with respect to your service to the Company as its Chief Financial Officer.  This Amendment shall become effective (the “Effective Date”) upon its full execution and shall modify the Original Agreement as follows:  
		
	1.
	The amount of your relocation and housing expenses for the Term as provided in Section 4(c) of the Original Agreement shall be increased from $40,000 to up to $64,000 and such $24,000 incremental amount shall be paid during the remainder of the Term upon presentment of invoices.


Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.  Except as set forth herein the terms of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.                                                  
NeoStem, Inc.
By:/s/ Robin Smith
Name:Robin Smith
Title:CEO
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
/s/ Robert Dickey IV
Robert Dickey IV
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6645]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The able majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
No. 87-6313.

#### Griffin *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.