alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E961]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    A TRIBUTE TO JESSE J. LEWIS, JR.

                                 ______

                         HON. EARL F. HILLIARD

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. HILLIARD. Mr. Speaker, Jesse J. Lewis, Jr., was a graduate of 
Miles College, where he obtained a bachelor of science degree in 
business administration. He continued his concern for education 
throughout his life, attending numerous executive continuing education 
programs at colleges and universities around the country.
  Mr. Lewis began his illustrious advertising and communications career 
in 1979 with Jesse J. Lewis and Associates, where he held several 
important positions. Under his direction, clients won numerous 
prestigious awards for advertising, including a Telly which is awarded 
for regional and local television advertising. His unrelenting 
dedication and leadership enabled his clients to grow and succeed.
  In addition to marketing and communications expertise, Jesse worked 
extensively in the production field. He was chief engineer at the New 
London Record Studios, where he supervised the production of radio 
spots, jingles, and custom music for local and national clients.
  As a member of the board of directors for the police athletic team, 
the Alabama Ballet Theater and the Magic City Art Connection, Jesse was 
actively involved in civic and social work throughout Alabama. He was a 
member of the National Association of Marketing Developers, the Urban 
League, the Birmingham Area Musicians Association, and the Metropolitan 
Business Association. He was also chairman of special projects for Toys 
for Tots, and chairman of the Birmingham Crime Commission.
  Jesse passed away suddenly due to a tragic car accident on February 
26, 1995. He is survived by his loving mother, Helen; his devoted 
father, Jesse Lewis, Sr., former President of Lawson State Community 
College and Publisher of the Birmingham Times newspaper, and his 
brother, James Lewis.
  Jesse Lewis, Jr., contributed immeasurably to the communications and 
business area of the African-American community of Birmingham, as well 
as to the constructive relationships with diverse business entities for 
the State of Alabama. Jesse will be greatly missed by family and 
friends. However, the legacy he leaves behind shall preserve an 
indelible impression for all of us who came to know and love him.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TIMOTHY MADDOX.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5357]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New York [Mr. Owens] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. OWENS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### Samuel Penny and others *versus*Isaac Van Cleef.

Oct. Term, 1828.

An application to amend the declaration, will at all times be granted upon payment of costs, where such amendments .do not operate as a surprise upon the defendant, nor subject him to injury. But the defendant, in such a case, will be permitted to withdraw his pleas, and plead again, *de novo.*

*Mr. C. C. King,*in behalf of the plaintiffs, at the last August term of this court, moved for leave to amend the declaration in this cause by inserting special counts therein.

*Mr. G. W. Strong,*for the defendant,

opposed the motion; and contended, that if the application were granted, that the plaintiffs ought to stipulate to accept a common notice of set-off, instead of special pleas, if such pleas should finally be required for the defence. But the court ruled, that the plaintiffs had a right to amend their declaration, as a matter of course, before plea pleaded, upon payment of costs ; and they therefore granted the motion.

And now, at this term, after the defendant had put in his pleas, *Mr. King*again moved for leave to amend the declaration a second time, stating as a reason, that a mistake had been made in setting out the quantities of certain goods specified in the special *166counts, for which promissory notes had been promised, but never . * i i furnished. -*

*Mr. G.*Griffin, for the defendant,

stated, that he had a judgment against the plaintiffs for an amount equal^to^their claim : that the promise to give a promissory note was denied, and that the real object of the plaintiffs was to avoid the set-off.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiffs are entitled to the effect of their motion, as a matter of course: an application to amend never being refused where it does not operate as a surprise upon the defendant, nor subject him to injury. The plaintiffs, however, must pay the costs of the motion; and *the*defendant has leave to withdraw his pleas, and plead again *de novo.*He cannot be subjected to any injury by the amendments, because he will have every opportunity to shape his defence according to the exigency of the case.

*Motion granted on payment of costs.*

[C. C. King, *atty. for the plffs. G.*W. Strong, *atty. for the deft.]*
[No. 1514.]

#### John Ruston *v.*The State.

Practice—Statement oe Pacts—Case Stated.—An order allowing ten days after adjournment of court in which to prepare and file a statement of facts having been entered of record, the appellant’s counsel prepared a statement, and on the day before the expiration of the time allowed he presented the same to the prosecuting attorney for his action. The prosecuting attorney declined to sign it, or to aid in making up a correct statement, whereupon the appellant’s counsel presented the statement to the trial judge, who likewise declined to act upon it, or to make out and certify any statement of facts. Held, error, inasmuch as by such action the trial court deprived the appellant of a right he was legally entitled to. • • '

Appeal from the County Court of De Witt. Tried below before the Hon. J. D. Terry, County Judge.

*337Opinion delivered January 26, 1884

The information charged the appellant and George Ruston, jointly, with the theft of property under the value of twenty dollars. A severance being had, the appellant was alone placed' upon trial, convicted, and his punishment affixed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of fifty dollars.

Eo brief for appellant has reached the Reporters.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

By an order of the court, entered of record, after the conviction of defendant, and upon his notice of appeal to this court, the parties were allowed ten days from the adjournment of the court to make up, sign and file in the record a statement of facts. One day before the time thus allowed had expired, counsel for defendant presented to the county attorney a statement of facts made up by them for the action of said county attorney, but he declined to sign the same, or to take any action in relation thereto, or to aid in any manner in making up a statement of facts. Defendant’s counsel on the same day presented their statement to the county judge who had tried the case, and he likewise declined to act upon the same, and declined to make up and certify any statement of facts, and the record is before us without any statement of facts, but with the foregoing showing accounting for its absence.

It appears from, this statement that the defendant, without any fault or neglect on his part, or on the part of his counsel, has been deprived of a most important legal right, and such being the case, the judgment of conviction will be reversed and the cause remanded. *(Trammel*v. *The*State, 1 Texas Ct. App., 121; *Longley*v. *The State,*3 Texas Ct. App., 611; *Babb*v. *The State,*8 Texas Ct. App., 173.)

*Reversed and remanded.*
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Typhoon Aftermath in Guam, Assignment Swap, Reaper UpgradePublished June 9, 2023
                        
                        By Senior Airman Saomy Sabournin
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, recovery efforts after Typhoon Mawar hits Guam, a new assignment swap program begins, and the MQ-9 Reaper gets a satellite communication upgrade. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



recovery efforts 



Typhoon Mawar 



Guam 



assignment swap program 



MQ-9 Reaper 



upgrade Related Links
        AATC tests enhanced intelligence gathering capabilities with MQ-9 Reaper upgrade
            
            Air Force’s Enlisted Swap Assignment Program starts June 1
            
            AFIMSC disaster response team deploys to help recover Guam after Typhoon Mawar
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 44-2010]

Notice is hereby given of termination of a sourcing change review related to certain chemical ingredients at the manufacturing facility of Baxter Healthcare of Puerto Rico located in Guayama, Puerto Rico (75 FR 40795-40796, 7/14/2010). The termination is based on an analysis of the record and resulting determination that no further action is warranted.

Dated: September 3, 2010.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

[FR Doc. 2010-23308 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 13, 2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection
with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors
Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further
certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|    |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50948 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN JOSE MOLINA-BARRAZA, also known as Juan Quesada, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-797-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Jose Molina-Barraza appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Molina argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Molina acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 00-50948 - 2 - Molina’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             HONORING JOHN VINCENT FIORE ON HIS RETIREMENT

                                 ______

                       HON. ESTEBAN EDWARD TORRES

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Mr. TORRES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize, John Vincent 
Fiore, vice president, trade relations of Pepsi-Cola West. Mr. Fiore is 
retiring from Pepsi-Cola after 41 years of service.
  Mr. Fiore attended Northwestern University and specialized in 
business management and advertising. Prior to joining Pepsi-Cola, he 
served in the U.S. Army.
  He has been an active member of the Mexican-American Grocers 
Association, California State Package Store and Tavern Owners 
Association, Korean Grocers Association, Chinese Grocers Association, 
and the National Conference of Christians and Jews. He is the past 
president of RecyCal and a member of the political affairs committee 
for the California Nevada Soft Drink Association.
  In addition, under Mr. Fiore's direction, Pepsi-Cola has become 
actively involved with community youth programs in an effort to guide 
young people in the right direction. Pepsi-Cola has participated in 
public awareness programs such as Just Say No To Drugs and Don't Drop 
Out Of School. In his community and company, he has made contributions 
to the minority community so that it may grow and prosper.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with pride that I rise to recognize my friend, 
John V. Fiore, and I ask my colleagues to join me in saluting him for 
his outstanding commitment to his community.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 44594-4-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### Jeffrey Cole, *Respondent,*v. Sandra Lynn Garross, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 99-2-01709-7, Charles S. French, J., entered April 6, 1999. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### J. N. Lerrick v. N. D. Wright.

(No. 1958, Op. Book No. 3, p. 536.)

Appeal from Bexar County.

April 16, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 165. *Appeal bond to court of appeals; conditions of.*An appeal bond from the county court to the court of appeals was conditioned as'follows: “ The said J. N. Lerrick shall prosecute his appeal to effect, and shall pay and satisfy the judgment or decree that may be rendered against him and the obligors in this bond by the court of appeals.” *Held,*that the bond was not conditioned as the law requires. If it is intended as a bond for costs, it is defective in not binding the obligors for the payment of all the costs which have accrued in the court below, or which may accrue in the appellate court. If intended as a *supersedeas*bond, it is defective for omitting to stipulate for the payment of all such damages as the appellate court may award against the appellant. [R. S. arts. 1400-1404; Reid v. Fernandez, 52 Tex. 379.] The appeal was dismissed.
DENIED and Opinion Filed October 30, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-01054-CV

IN RE NFI INTERACTIVE LOGISTICS, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-10872

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Molberg

In its October 20, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from 

part of a trial court order denying its motion for leave to conduct additional 

discovery. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude 

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. 
–2–

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a).

231054f.p05

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
DENIED and Opinion Filed October 30, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 23

- 01054

- CV
IN RE NFI INTERACTIV E LOGISTICS, LLC , Relator Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 10872

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Molberg In its October 20, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from
part of a trial court order denying its motion for leave to conduct additional
discovery.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequ ate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding)

. After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.– 2

–

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a).

231054 f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ / KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors




The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:









We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Assertion of Compliance, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-A Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction (the "Platform"), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2014.  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion management's assertion about on the Company’s compliance based on our examination.






Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.






In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2014, is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ KPMG LLP




Chicago, Illinois


May 30, 2014
[No. 45227-4-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### Laboratory Corporation of America, *Respondent,*v. Biomed Comm, Incorporated, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-24932-3, Richard A. Jones, J., entered August 16 and September 7, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.