alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2173
QING TUAN ZHENG, Petitioner, versus PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-227-112) Submitted: August 31, 2007 Decided: September 27, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fengling Liu, LAW OFFICE OF FENGLING LIU, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Debora Gerads, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Qing Tuan Zheng, a native and citizen of The People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the ruling that Zheng failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. See8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that the burden of proof is onthe alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). Moreover, as Zheng cannot sustain his burden on the asylum claim, he cannot establish his entitlement to withholding of removal. See Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004) (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”). We also find that Zheng’s due process rights were not violated by the immigration judge’s decision to disallow Zheng’s wife’s testimony. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the immigration judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately- 3 - presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 10.4

 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Third Amendment (the “Third Amendment”), is made and entered into as of this 19th day of June, 2014, and is an amendment to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of April 29, 2011, between SHFL entertainment, Inc. formerly known as Shuffle Master, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“SHFL”), and Kathryn S. Lever (“Executive”), amended by that certain Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 25, 2013, between Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), as successor in interest by merger to SHFL, and amended by that certain Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 13, 2014 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”).  All capitalized terms used in this Third Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement.

 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:

 

1.         Article I of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following Article 1:

 

Employment.  The term of Executive’s employment under this Agreement shall begin on the Agreement Date and continue until such time as either the Company or the Executive terminates Executive’s employment (the “Employment Period”).  Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Company may terminate Executive’s employment at any time for any reason or for no reason.  Executive may terminate her employment upon not less than forty-five (45) days’ prior written notice to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”).  Company and Executive understand that Executive is employed at will, subject to discharge at any time, with or without notice, for any reason or for no reason whatsoever.  Where this Agreement provides for the provision of a perquisite or benefit that is subject to or governed by Company’s plans or policies, Executive agrees that Company may alter, amend, limit or otherwise eliminate such plans or policies at will.

 

2.         Article V(C) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

 

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is hereby confirmed and ratified by the parties as being and remaining in full force and effect, according to its terms and conditions, and without any further amendments or modifications.

 

	
Company:
    	
 
    	
Executive:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Bally   Technologies, Inc.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Neil Davidson
    	
 
    	
/s/ Kathryn Lever
    
	
Name:
    	
Neil   Davidson
    	
 
    	
Kathryn S.   Lever
    
	
Its:
    	
Senior   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    	
 
    	
 
    
					


 

Page 1 of 2











 

	
APPROVED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Bally   Technologies, Inc.

Compensation   Committee
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Josephine Linden
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Josephine Linden
    	
 
    
	
Its:
    	
Chairman
    	
 
    


 

Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2896 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2896

  To amend title 31, United States Code, to adjust for inflation the 
amount that is exempt from administrative offsets by the Department of 
                 Education for defaulted student loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2014

Ms. Collins (for herself and Mr. Nelson) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 31, United States Code, to adjust for inflation the 
amount that is exempt from administrative offsets by the Department of 
                 Education for defaulted student loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Garnishment 
Modernization Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 3716(c)(3)(A) of title 31, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``An amount'' and inserting 
        ``Except as provided in clause (iii), an amount''; and
            (2) by inserting after the matter following clause (ii)(II) 
        the following:
                    ``(iii) For a claim that may be collected under 
                this section by the Department of Education relating to 
                a defaulted student loan under part B, D, or E of title 
                IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1071 
                et seq., 1087a et seq., and 1087aa et seq.), the amount 
                of payments due to an individual under the Social 
                Security Act that is exempt from offset under this 
                subsection shall be equal to the exemption amount under 
                clause (ii), as adjusted annually to reflect increases 
                in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and 
                Clerical Workers published by the Bureau of Labor 
                Statistics of the Department of Labor.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall--
            (1) take effect as if included in the enactment of the 
        Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 
        (Public Law 104-134; 110 Stat. 1321); and
            (2) only apply with respect to a claim described in section 
        3716(c)(3)(A)(iii) of title 31, United States Code, as added by 
        subsection (a)(2), that may be collected by administrative 
        offset by the Department of Education under section 3716 of 
        such title after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


              Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of American Business Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report")
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: November 12, 2004                     /s/ Anthony J. Santilli
                                            -----------------------
                                            Anthony J. Santilli
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 12, 2004                    /s/ Albert W. Mandia
                                           ------------------------
                                           Chief Financial Officer

              The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1022]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______

                             HON. RON LEWIS

                              of kentucky

                    in the house of representatives

                          Friday, May 12, 1995
  Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky. Mr. Speaker, on May 10, 1995, I attended the 
funeral for the wife of my esteemed colleague, Mr. Hal Rogers. 
Consequently, I was not available to vote on a number of measures 
pertaining to H.R. 961, the Clean Water Act. Had I been available, I 
would have cast the following votes:
Rollcall No.:                                                      Vote
    311.............................................................Yes
    312..............................................................No
    313..............................................................No
    314..............................................................No

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 CMSAF Leadership Library: September 2021Published Sept. 20, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                **Teammates,**

It is no secret that we are at an inflection point in our Air Force. As Air Force Chief of Staff, Gen. Charles Q. Brown, says, “good enough today will fail tomorrow.”

We need leaders at all levels who can think strategically, and execute tactically. To that end, I’m bringing you a reading list that will flex and evolve as we build the Air Force we need to compete, deter and win across all domains.

As a lifelong learner, I am constantly adding to my reading list - looking for new ideas that can challenge my assumptions and help me grow beyond my own limitations. As your 19th Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force, I am committed to sharing this information with you, in the hope that you will apply it and eventually grow beyond us all.

We are the best Air Force in the world because of our people. I encourage each of you to take up the mantle of a learning leader, who continues to challenge the status quo and take us to new heights.

I am honored to serve alongside you, and I look forward to seeing you all out in our Air Force.

Aim High -

**JOANNE S. BASS
Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force**



**Recommendations**



**Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know - Adam Grant**

As we move toward building Multi-Capable Airmen, we need to encourage the ability to think, adapt, take risks and ultimately win across all domains. Think Again speaks to the foundational shift we need to make when building the Airmen of 2030 and beyond.

**The Hundred-Year Marathon - Michael Pillsbury**

I often talk about playing the long game. Our adversaries have been engaged in a long game that spans a century. We need our Airmen to fundamentally understand what is at stake, and what our world could look like if we simply stay the course and don’t accelerate the change our Air Force needs.

**LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media - P.W. Singer and Emerson T. Brooking**

The digital domain is a battlefield, and our adversaries have weaponized social media. As more Airmen join our Air Force as digital natives, we need them to see this environment for what it is - a high-stakes terrain that is rapidly evolving and constantly bombarding our people with corrosive influences.Leadership Library 



CMSAF 



Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force 



reading list
BIOS-EX10.25--2013.12.31-10K/A




Exhibit 10.25





July 30, 2012




Brian Stiver
471 San Gabriel Court
Sierra Madre, CA  91024




Dear Brian, 


This letter is to confirm our offer to you for the Senior Vice President, Infusion Sales position reporting to Rick Smith, Chief Executive Officer.  We are delighted to offer you this promotion, Brian!


Your salary will be increased to $10,576.93 bi-weekly, subject to applicable taxes and other withholdings.  Your promotion and salary increase will be effective July 30, 2012.


Additionally, you would be eligible to participate in BioScrip’s Management Incentive Bonus Program as long as you remain continuously employed with BioScrip through the date that the bonus is paid.  You would be eligible for a bonus of up to 40% of your base salary with the pool determined by the Company and the Board of Directors and subject to corporate, departmental and individual objectives being met.  Your participation in this plan would be prorated based on your promotion date. This plan is subject to change.


For clarification and the protection of both you and the Company, your acceptance of this offer represents the sole agreement between you and the Company.  No prior promises, representations, and/or understandings relating to the offer of employment as set forth in this letter are to be considered part of this letter.  This offer supersedes all prior offers, both verbal and written.


If you have any questions regarding this offer, please don’t hesitate to call me at 513-458-4848.
Congratulations!  We look forward to your success in this important role.




Sincerely,


/s/ Erinn Wainscott


Erinn Wainscott                Agreed and Accepted:
Manager, Human Resources
BioScrip, Inc.
513-458-4848                  /s/Brian Stiver
Fax 952-674-5672                Brian Stiver                    Date
EXHIBIT 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-186228) on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2012 Share Incentive Plan of Era Group Inc. and registration statement (No 333-187116) on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2013 Employee Purchase Plan of Era Group Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Dart Holding Company Ltd. as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and retained earnings, and cash flows for the period from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, not included herein, which report appears in Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Era Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012.








/s/ KPMG LLP





Calgary, Canada


April 26, 2013
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jon W. Howie, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K/A of Chuy’s Holdings, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date: April 17, 2015


/s/ Jon W. HowieJon W. HowieVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[wiei_ex232001.jpg]      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation in this Registration Statement on Form 20-F of our report dated February 24, 2012 except for Note 12 which is dated as of May 7, 2012 with respect to the audited consolidated balance sheets of Rampart Detection Systems, Ltd as of July 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2011 and 2010 and the period from January 9, 2009 (inception) through July 31, 2011.  We also consent to the references to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.  /s/ MaloneBailey, LLP MaloneBailey, LLP www.malone−bailey.com Houston, Texas  May 7, 2012     [wiei_ex232002.jpg]
#### THOMAS LYONS v. PREMO PHARMACEUTICAL LABS, INC.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied. (See 170 *N.J.Super.*183)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of SkyWolf Wind Turbine Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April 1, 2019 | By: | /s/ Gerald Brock                                     
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Gerald Brock                                         
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                     |    
|Dated: April 1, 2019 | By: | /s/ Amy Brock                                        
|                     |     | Amy Brock                                            
|                     |     | Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)              



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Moosewood Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2012
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Luke Edward Badura, * From the 266th District

 Court of Erath County,

 Trial Court No. CR13447.

Vs. No. 11-11-00166-CR * June 13, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 16, 2024

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 24

- 00966

- CV

MIG TECH SOLUTIONS L LC, MICROINFO INC., MICROINFO IT INC.,

MICROINFO TECH INC., ADGLOBAL 360 INC., ZODIAN SOLUTIONS INC ., AND IMRAN MEMON, INDIVIDUAL , Appellants V. ORIGIN BANK, A FOREI GN FINANCIAL INSTITU TION , Appellee

On Appeal from the 493rd District C ourt

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 493

- 04371

- 2024

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Partida

- Kipness, Goldstein, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel Before the Court is appellants’ September 10, 2024 motion to dismiss the

appeal because the p arties have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a)(1).

240966f.p05 /Emily Miskel/ EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MIG TECH SOLUTIONS LLC, MICROINFO INC., MICROINFO IT INC., MICROINFO TECH INC., ADGLOBAL 360 INC., ZODIAN SOLUTIONS INC., AND IMRAN MEMON, INDIVIDUAL, Appellants

No. 05

- 24

- 00966

- CV V.

ORIGIN BANK, A FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, Appellee On Appeal from the 493rd District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 493

- 04371

- 2024. Opinion delivered by Justi ce Miskel. Justices Partida

- Kipness and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee ORIGIN BANK, A FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION recover its costs of this appeal from appellants MIG TECH SOLUTIONS LLC, MICROINFO INC., MICROINFO IT INC., MICROINFO TECH INC., ADGLOBAL 360 INC., ZODIAN SOLUTIONS INC., AND IMRAN MEMON, INDIVIDU AL.

Judgment entered this 16 th day of September

, 2024

.