alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

# AGENCY:

Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    The Trucking Industry Mobility & Technology Coalition (TIMTC) Annual                           ( print page 56652)                        Meeting will be held October 18-19, 2010 in conjunction with ATA's Management Conference & Exhibition in Phoenix, providing TIMTC members with the opportunity to participate in both events simultaneously. TIMTC is a U.S. DOT-sponsored forum for public and private sector stakeholders that are focused on the latest in truck technology and productivity initiatives. TIMTC members will convene in Phoenix this October for business and educational meetings focused on today's top issues including: Truck IntelliDrive: Beating Gridlock with a Smart Grid; U.S. DOT Truck Technology Initiatives; and State and Federal Reauthorization Objectives.                

*Confirmed speakers include:*                     Anne Ferro, FMCSA Administrator; Jeff Lindley, FHWA Associate Administrator for Operations; Allen Biehler, Secretary of Transportation, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; David Parker, Senior Legal Counsel, Great West Casualty; and other top industry executives.                

                    For more information and your free registration for the TIMTC Annual Meeting, please contact Carla Schulz at 770-432-0628 or                     *TIMTC@trucking.org.*                     Not yet a member of TIMTC? Membership is free and provides the latest information and updates on trucking industry initiatives that improve the industry's safety and mobility. Send your contact information to                     *TIMTC@trucking.org*                     to receive your free membership.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on the 9th day of September 2010.

John Augustine,

Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-22962 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
News United States Air Force
 Special leave accrual for service membersPublished April 17, 2020
                        
                        By DoD News
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Today, Matthew Donovan, under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness, signed a department-wide authorization for service members to accrue and retain an additional leave balance of up to 120 days. The department's actions to stem the spread of **COVID-19** has significantly limited the ability of service members to take leave during this national emergency, and we know that leave is vital to the health and welfare of our force.
The memo can be found **here**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



DOD 



Defense Department 



special leave accrual 



COVID-19 



coronavirus 



health 



welfare 



SAF 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness 



Matthew Donovan
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHN O. RILEY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4037

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County,

Randell H. Rowe, lll, Judge.

William Douglas Stanford, Jr., St.

Augustine, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. 

Hagan, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

COHEN, C.J.

Appellant John Riley appeals an order summarily denying his motion for return of 

personal property. Appellant sought the return of a vehicle and other personal property 

seized upon his arrest. We reverse. 

Motions for return of personal property are “governed by procedures similar to 

those used in postconviction proceedings.” Shade v. State, 55 So. 3d 722, 723 (Fla. 5th 
2

DCA 2011) (quoting Bolden v. State, 875 So. 2d 780, 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)). A facially 

sufficient motion alleges that: (1) the movant owns the property; (2) the property is not the

fruit of criminal activity; and (3) the State is not holding the property as evidence. Scott v. 

State, 922 So. 2d 1024, 1026 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). It also specifically identifies the 

property. Id. Appellant’s motion was facially sufficient in this case; thus, the trial court was 

required to hold an evidentiary hearing or attach records conclusively demonstrating that 

Appellant was entitled to no relief. Bolden, 875 So. 2d at 782–83.

The State disputes that Appellant owns the subject property, namely the vehicle 

listed in Appellant’s motion. However, the records submitted by the State, and relied on 

by the trial court, do not conclusively demonstrate that Appellant has no ownership or 

possessory interest in the property. Therefore, the trial court erred in summarily denying 

the motion. On remand, the trial court must attach records conclusively refuting 

Appellant’s claim to the property or hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion. “[I]f the 

State is ‘unable to connect the items to specific criminal activity, and no one else can be 

identified who can demonstrate a superior possessory interest in the property, it should 

be returned to [Appellant] or to such person(s) as he may designate.’” Id. at 783 (quoting 

Stone v. State, 630 So. 2d 660, 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)). 

REVERSED AND REMANDED. 

TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Order filed January 11, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00200-CR

____________

CEDRIC MAURICE JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1190293

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 

34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit #2 .

The clerk of the 185th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the 

original of State's Exhibit #2 , on or before January 19, 2012. The Clerk of this court is directed 

to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court 

for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 

#2 , to the clerk of the 185th District Court.

PER CURIAM
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-60349

KATHY DOOLEY, Individually and as Administratrix of the 

Estate of Bruce A. Dooley, and as Next Friend of

Issac Dooley and Dawn Dooley,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

INTERNATIONAL SAFETY INSTRUMENTS, INC.

Defendant-Appellee,

and 

TEAM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; ABC CORPORATION, BRAND SCAFFOLD

SERVICES, INC.; SCAFFOLDING RENTAL AND ERECTION SERVICES, INC., 

also known as Brand Scaffold Services, Inc.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

(1:93-CV-562-GR)

April 8, 1996

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Bruce Dooley was killed while performing his work at Chevron’s

Biloxi, Mississippi refinery and his widow and children brought

this action claiming defective design against the manufacturer of
2

the safety breathing equipment he was using. The district court

granted summary judgment for defendant and plaintiffs appeal. We

affirm.

Plaintiffs contend the district court erred by weighing the

credibility of plaintiff’s expert witness and in granting summary

judgment for defendant. We have carefully considered the parties’

briefs, their oral argument, and have studied the record; in

particular, the district court’s reasons for its ruling. We are

convinced that the district court did not weigh the credibility of

plaintiff’s expert nor did the district court rule that evidence

inadmissible. Careful reading of the district court’s

pronouncements shows that, considering the expert evidence, the

district court found that plaintiffs have not shown an issue of

material fact as to defect in the design of the safety equipment or

any causal connection between its design and the tragic death of

Mr. Dooley. We see no error in this ruling.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Scott Keys, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IndyMacBancorp, Inc. (“IndyMac Bancorp”), certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IndyMac Bancorp; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: October 28, 2004    /s/ Scott KeysScott Keys
Exhibit
10.4


 


		September 30, 2014




 


DT Asia Investments
Limited

Room 1102, 11/F.,

Beautiful Group Tower,

77 Connaught Road Central,

Hong Kong


 


DeTiger Holdings Limited

Room 1102, 11/F.,

Beautiful Group Tower,

77 Connaught Road Central,

Hong Kong


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of DT Asia Investments Limited (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of
(i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as
described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
DeTiger Holdings Limited (“DeTiger Holdings”) shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative
and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at Room 1102, 11/F., Beautiful Group Tower,
77 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong (or any successor location).  In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay DeTiger
Holdings the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.  DeTiger
Holdings hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set
aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO
(the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of,
any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason
whatsoever.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	DT ASIA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Stephen N. Cannon
	 	Name:	Stephen N. Cannon
	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer















 





	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	DETIGER HOLDINGS LIMITED	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/Winnie NG	 
	Name:	Winnie NG	 
	Title:	Director
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 351 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. COATS, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. WICKER, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. 

COBURN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. THUNE, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BURR, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. PAUL, 

Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BLUNT, 

Mrs. FISCHER, Ms. AYOTTE, and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors’ 

5 Access to Medicare Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 351 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVI2 SORY BOARD. 

3 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec4 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec5 tions 3403 and 10320 of such Act (including the amend6 ments made by such sections) are repealed, and any provi7 sion of law amended by such sections is hereby restored 

8 as if such sections had not been enacted into law. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          221,868
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   785,963
<ALLOWANCES>                    101,866
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,608,156
<PP&E>                          583,685
<DEPRECIATION>                  216,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,757,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           5,740,136
<BONDS>                         6,343,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     100
<COMMON>                        10,334
<OTHER-SE>                      (4,336,606)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,757,199
<SALES>                         55,781,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                55,781,752
<CGS>                           53,368,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   53,368,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,826,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              224,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (637,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (637,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (637,723)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.03)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-36]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date: September 17, 2010.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: September 9, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-22918 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
News United States Air Force
 B-1 crew trains with Japan, USS Ronald Reagan in Indo-PacificPublished Aug. 11, 2020
                        
                        By 1st Lt. Joshua Sinclair
                        
                        
                        28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (AFNS) --**
                AB-1B Lancer launching from Andersen Air Force Base conducted a bilateral mission with Japan and a joint mission with the USS Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group (CSG) Aug. 7 in the Indo-Pacific region.



The B-1, from the 37th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron, integrated with the eight F-2s and six F-15s from the Koku-Jieitai, or Japanese Air Self-Defense Force, in the vicinity of Japan, to improve interoperability and readiness between the two nations’ forces.



“Opportunities to train alongside our joint partners and allies in the region are an invaluable experience for our Airmen,” said Lt. Col. Lincoln Coleman, 37th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron commander. “Not only are we able to highlight our continued commitment to our allies, but it also increases our ability to integrate with one another and strengthen our combined capabilities.”



The B-1 also conducted joint war training at sea with the Reagan CSG in the East Sea.



"Integration with our joint partners is essential to ensuring joint force responsiveness and lethality, and maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific," said U.S. Navy Cmdr. Joshua Fagan, Task Force 70 air operations officer. "The recent integrated training between our carrier strike group and Air Force B-1s is the latest example of how we are continually working to stay synched with all of our joint partners and ready to respond to any contingencies throughout the region."



B-1s are deployed to Guam fromEllsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, to conduct long-range, long-duration Bomber Task Force missions, which give aircrews opportunities to train alongside allies and partners in a joint environment and build interoperability to bolster their ability to support a free and open Indo-Pacific.



The continual interoperability training is designed to promote stability, security and seamless integration throughout the Indo-Pacific for the U.S. Air Force and joint and partner forces.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



B-1 



Japan 



USS Ronald Reagan 



Indo-Pacific 



28th Bomb Wing 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



AFGSC 



37th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron 



Japanese Air Self-Defense Force 



JASDF 



Joint Training