56556 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2The Commission also finds that imports subject 

to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances 

determination are not likely to undermine seriously 

the remedial effect of the antidumping duty order 

on China. 

3Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, and 

Commissioners Daniel R. Pearson and Shara L. 

Aranoff determine that an industry in the United 

States is threatened with material injury by reason 

of imports of certain magnesia carbon bricks from 

China and determine that an industry in the United 

States is not materially injured or threatened with 

material injury, or that the establishment of an 

industry in the United States is materially retarded, 

by reason of imports from Mexico of certain 

magnesia carbon bricks. 

National Register of Historic Places. 

Comments may be forwarded by United 

States Postal Service, to the National 

Register of Historic Places, National 

Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, 

Washington, DC 20240; by all other 

carriers, National Register of Historic 

Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye 

St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 

20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written 

or faxed comments should be submitted 

by October 1, 2010. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

J. Paul Loether, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

Request for REMOVAL has been made 

for the following resource: 

INDIANA 

Brown County 

Grandview Church, Grandview Ridge Rd. SE 

of New Bellsville, New Bellsville, 

91001160 

[FR Doc. 2010–23174 Filed 9–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–468 and 731– 

TA–1166–1167 (Final)] 

Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

China and Mexico 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(Commission) determines, pursuant to 

section 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)) and 19 

U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an 

industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

from China and Mexico of certain 

magnesia carbon bricks, provided for in 

subheadings 6902.10.10, 6902.10.50, 

6815.91.99, and 6815.99.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States, that have been found by 

the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) to be subsidized by the 

Government of China and to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(LTFV).2 3

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective July 29, 2009, 

following receipt of a petition filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by 

Resco Products Inc., Pittsburgh, PA. The 

final phase of the investigations was 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of certain magnesia carbon 

bricks from China were being 

subsidized within the meaning of 

section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(b)) and that imports of certain 

magnesia carbon bricks from China and 

Mexico were being sold at LTFV within 

the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act 

(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the 

scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register of April 23, 2010 (75 FR 

21346). The hearing was held in 

Washington, DC, on July 27, 2010, and 

all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigations to 

the Secretary of Commerce on 

September 8, 2010. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 4182 (September 2010), 

entitled Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks 

from China and Mexico: Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–468 and 731–TA–1166– 

1167 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 10, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23062 Filed 9–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–678] 

In the Matter of Certain Energy Drink 

Products; Notice of Issuance of a 

General Exclusion; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has issued a general 

exclusion order in the above-captioned 

investigation and has terminated the 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia 

Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

708–3747. Copies of all nonconfidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

trademark and copyright-based 

investigation was instituted by the 

Commission on June 17, 2009, based on 

a complaint filed by Red Bull GmbH of 

Fuschl am See, Austria, and Red Bull 

North America, Inc. of Santa Monica, 

California (collectively, ‘‘Red Bull’’). 74 

FR 28725 (Jun. 17, 2009). The 

respondents named in the notice of 

investigation were: Chicago Import Inc. 

of Chicago, Illinois (‘‘Chicago Import’’); 

Lamont Distr., Inc., a/k/a Lamont 

Distributors Inc., of Brooklyn, New York 

(‘‘Lamont’’); India Imports, Inc., a/k/a 

International Wholesale Club, of 

Metairie, Louisiana (‘‘India Imports’’); 

Washington Food and Supply of D.C., 

Inc., a/k/a Washington Cash & Carry, of 

Washington, DC (‘‘Washington Food’’); 

Vending Plus, Inc. d/b/a Baltimore 

Beverage Co., of Glen Burnie, Maryland 

(‘‘Vending Plus’’); Posh Nosh Imports 

(USA), Inc. of South Kearny, New Jersey 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Notices 56557 

(‘‘Posh Nosh’’); Greenwich, Inc. of 

Florham Park, New Jersey 

(‘‘Greenwich’’); Advantage Food 

Distributors Ltd. of Suffolk, UK 

(‘‘Advantage Food’’); Wheeler Trading, 

Inc. of Miramar, Florida (‘‘Wheeler 

Trading’’); Avalon International General 

Trading, LLC of Dubai, United Arab 

Emirates (‘‘Avalon’’); and Central 

Supply, Inc. of Brooklyn, New York 

(‘‘Central Supply’’). The complaint 

further alleged that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The 

asserted trademarks are U.S. Trademark 

Reg. Nos. 3,092,197; 2,946,045; 

2,994,429; and 3,479,607. The asserted 

copyright is U.S. Copyright Registration 

No. VA0001410959. 

On January 5, 2010, the Commission 

determined not to review two initial 

determinations (‘‘IDs’’) (Order Nos. 21 

and 22) finding Lamont and Avalon in 

default pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.16. On January 28, 2010, the 

Commission determined not to review 

two additional IDs (Order Nos. 29 and 

30) finding respondents Posh Nosh, 

Greenwich, Advantage Food, and 

Chicago Imports in default pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.16. On February 

16, 2010, the Commission determined 

not to review an ID (Order No. 32) 

finding respondent Central Supply in 

default pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.16. 

Wheeler Trading, Washington Food, 

India Imports, and Vending Plus were 

the only respondents that responded to 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. On January 20, 2010, the 

Commission determined not to review 

four IDs (Order Nos. 24, 25, 26, and 27) 

terminating the investigation as to those 

respondents on the basis of settlement 

agreements. Thus, defaulting 

respondents Posh Nosh, Greenwich, 

Advantage Food, Chicago Imports, 

Avalon, Central Supply, and Lamont 

were the only respondents remaining in 

the investigation. 

On December 2, 2009, Red Bull 

moved for summary determination on 

the issues of domestic industry, 

importation, and violation of Section 

337. Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.16(c)(2), 19 CFR 216(c)(2), Red Bull 

also stated that it was seeking a general 

exclusion order. On March 31, 2010, the 

presiding ALJ issued the subject ID, 

Order No. 34, granting Red Bull’s 

motion for summary determination of 

violation with respect to respondents 

Avalon, Posh Nosh, Greenwich, 

Advantage Food, Central Supply, and 

Chicago Import, but not with respect to 

Lamont. He also issued his 

recommendations on remedy and 

bonding in Order No. 34. Specifically, 

the ALJ recommended issuance of a 

general exclusion order and a bond of 

100 percent. No petitions for review 

were filed. 

On May 14, 2010, the Commission 

issued notice of its determination not to 

review the ID granting summary 

determination of violation in part, and 

requesting briefing on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. On May 

28, 2010, Red Bull submitted briefing on 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding. Specifically, Red Bull 

requested a general exclusion order. The 

IA also submitted briefing on May 28, 

2010, in support of a general exclusion 

order. No other submissions were 

received. 

Having reviewed the record in this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s 

recommended determination, the 

Commission has determined that the 

appropriate relief is a general exclusion 

order prohibiting the unlicensed entry 

of certain energy drink products that (i) 

infringe U.S. Trademark Registration 

Nos. 3,092,197; 2,946,045; 2,994,429; or 

3,479,607 or any marks confusingly 

similar thereto or that are otherwise 

misleading as to source, origin, or 

sponsorship, or (ii) bear Red Bull’s U.S. 

Copyright Registration No. 

VA0001410959 or a design confusingly 

similar thereto or that are otherwise 

misleading as to source, origin or 

sponsorship. 

The Commission has further 

determined that the public interest 

factors listed in section 337(d)(1) do not 

preclude issuance of the general 

exclusion order. Finally, the 

Commission has determined that the 

amount of bond to permit temporary 

importation during the period of 

Presidential review shall be in the 

amount of 100 percent of the value of 

the infringing products that are subject 

to the general exclusion order. The 

Commission’s order and opinion were 

delivered to the President and to the 

United States Trade Representative on 

the day they were issued. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.49–50 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 

210.49–50. 

Issued: September 8, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23045 Filed 9–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OJP (OJP) Docket No. 1528] 

Meeting of the Department of Justice’s 

(DOJ’s) Global Justice Information 

Sharing Initiative Federal Advisory 

Committee 

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs 

(OJP), Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: This is an announcement of a 

meeting of DOJ’s Global Justice 

Information Sharing Initiative (Global) 

Federal Advisory Committee (GAC) to 

discuss the Global Initiative, as 

described at http://www.it.ojp.gov/ 

global. 

DATES: The meeting will take place on 

Thursday, October 7, 2010, from 8:30 

a.m. to 12:30 p.m. ET. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place 

at the Embassy Suites Washington, DC 

Convention Center Hotel, 900 10th 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001, 

Phone: (202) 739–2001. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

J. Patrick McCreary, Global Designated 

Federal Employee (DFE), Bureau of 

Justice Assistance, Office of Justice 

Programs, 810 7th Street, Washington, 

DC 20531; Phone: (202) 616–0532 [Note: 

This is not a toll-free number]; E-mail: 

James.P.McCreary@usdoj.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting is open to the public. Due to 

security measures, however, members of 

the public who wish to attend this 

meeting must register with Mr. J. Patrick 

McCreary at the above address at least 

seven (7) days in advance of the 

meeting. Registrations will be accepted 

on a space available basis. Access to the 

meeting will not be allowed without 

registration. All attendees will be 

required to sign in at the meeting 

registration desk. Please bring photo 

identification and allow extra time prior 

to the meeting. 

Anyone requiring special 

accommodations should notify Mr. 

McCreary at least seven (7) days in 

advance of the meeting. 

Purpose 

The GAC will act as the focal point for 

justice information systems integration 

activities in order to facilitate the 

coordination of technical, funding, and 

legislative strategies in support of the 

Administration’s justice priorities. 

The GAC will guide and monitor the 

development of the Global information 

sharing concept. It will advise the 

Assistant Attorney General, OJP; the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES