alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force to launch Airman Leadership Qualities-based feedback in myEvalPublished March 31, 2022
                        
                        
                        Air Force's Personnel Center
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Airman Leadership Qualities-based feedback will replace the existing Airman Comprehensive Assessment for all ranks of Total Force Airmen beginning March 31.

Supervisors and Airmen will no longer be able to accomplish ACA feedback via the AF Forms 931, 932, 724, or 724-A. All ACAs that are not completed and signed by March 30 will automatically convert to include ALQ feedback ratings in the myEval system, located within myFSS.

ALQs represent the performance characteristics the Air Force wants to define, develop, incentivize, and measure in Airmen. They include job proficiency, initiative, adaptability, inclusion and teamwork, emotional intelligence, communication, stewardship, accountability, decision making, and innovation.

The next phase of the Air Force evaluation system transformation focuses on transitioning to competency-based standards for Air Force evaluations in late-2022/early-2023.

Supervisors must complete ALQ feedback with their Airmen to access enlisted evaluations closing September 30, 2022, or later, and officer evaluations closing October 31, 2022, or later.

This change to performance evaluations only affects Airmen; the United States Space Force will continue using current feedback and evaluation program policies for Guardians.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



ALQs 



Airman Leadership Qualities 



total force 



feedback 



update 



AFPC 



Air Force Personnel Center 



myEval 



myFSS 



performance Related Links
        Air Force announces Airmen leadership qualities
            
            Effective March 31, 2022 Airman Leadership Qualities will be integrated into feedback
#### IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS UNIVERSITY v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 275 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 

a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2013 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Little 

Wood River Ranch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH. 

6 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

7 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

8 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com9 mission project numbered 12063, the Federal Energy 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 275 IS

1 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li2 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

3 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

4 that section— 

5 (1) extend the time period during which the li6 censee is required to commence the construction of 

7 project works to the end of the 3-year period begin8 ning on the date of enactment of this Act; or 

9 (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has 

10 been terminated, reinstate the license and extend the 

11 time period during which the licensee is required to 

12 commence the construction of project works to the 

13 end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of en14 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Newell Bracket versus Joseph Simonds.

August Term, 1828.

Iri this Court,-no copy of a declaration or other pleading can be served upon the opposite party, until after the original has been filed with the clerk, ’ and an ap- • propriate rule entered in the rule book.

*Mr. Hawes,*in behalf of the plaintiff, moved to set aside a default, which had been entered against him for not declaring, pursuant to a rule duly entered for that purpose, in the book of common rules.

It appeared, that the plaintiff’s attorney had delayed the drawing of his declaration until the last day limited by the rule; , that on the evening of that day, he served a copy of the declaration upon the defendant’s attorney, at *Ms own house,*but did hot *file*the declaration, nor enter the rule to plead, until the succeeding day. On the day after the service of a copy of the declaration, the defendant’s attorney went to the clerk’s office, and there ascertained, that, at the time when the copy of the declaration was served upon him, the declaration itself had not been filed. He thereupon entered a default against the plaintiff, for not declaring in due season.

The -motion now was, -to set aside this default. And it was contended, in behalf of the plaintiff that by the settled practice of the Supreme Court, a service of a copy of any pleading upon the opposite party, is conclusive evidence as *to him,*that the original has been duly filed. [ *Smith v.*Wells, 6 *Johns. Rep.*286.]

The Court,

in accordance with the practice of the Supreme Court, set aside" the default in this case without costs, but observed, that in the city of New-York, there could be no good reason, why the pleading should not in all cases be filed, before a ■copy is served upon the opposite party.' In the country, where many attorneys reside ata distance from"’the clerk’s office, it might be productive of inconvenience, to compel the attorney to put the original paper on file in all cases, before the copy is *77served. And hence the reasonableness of the practice of the Supreme Court. But no" such inconvenience can arise with respect to this court. They therefore directed the following rule to be entered by the reporter.

*Regula generalis.*

“No copy of a declaration or other pleading shall be served “ upon the opposite party, until after the original shall have been “ regularly filed with the clerk of this court, and the appropriate “ rule entered in the rule book.”
Exhibit 10.1


 





General
Release.


 


For
and in consideration of US$14,200 paid by Songbird Development Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),
the undersigned, individually and in his capacity as a former officer, director, shareholder, creditor, or employee of or consultant
to the Seller, on behalf of himself, or anyone claiming through him, irrevocably and unconditionally releases, acquits, and forever
discharges the Company, its parent corporation, subsidiaries, divisions, predecessors, successors, affiliates, and assigns, as
well as their past and present officers, directors, employees, shareholders, trustees, joint venturers, partners, and anyone claiming
through them (collectively referred to as “Releasees”), in their individual and/or corporate capacities, from
any and all claims, liabilities, promises, actions, damages, debts, and the like, known or unknown, which the undersigned ever
had against any of the Releasees arising out of or relating to the undersigned’s employment the Company, service as an officer
or director of the Company, creditor of the Company, as a shareholder of the Company, or otherwise, and hereby covenants not to
assert such claims against any Releasee through a lawsuit, an administrative proceeding or otherwise.


 


Prior to executing this
General Release, the undersigned has consulted with, or has been advised by the Company to consult with, legal counsel.


 


In
witness whereof, the undersigned has executed this General Release of his own free will, this 22th day of October
2014.


 


 


	 	/s/ Igor Kaspruk
	 	Igor Kaspruk
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Scott Keys, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Scott Keys
---------------------------
Scott Keys
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2003
DISMISS; Opinion issued February 13, 2013 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01036

- CV
COLETTE WOODARDS , Appellant V. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CO. , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 03324

- D

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang

- Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The $175 filing fee in this case is ov erdue. By letter dated July 30, 2012, we notified appellant the filing fee was due. We directed appellant to pay the fee within ten days and cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal. Also by postcard dated J uly 30, 2012, we notified appellant the time for filing a docketing statement had expired. We directed appellant to file a docketing statement within ten days and cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed a docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.2 Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b),(c).

121036F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE3 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
COLETTE WOODARDS, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 01036

- CV V. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CO., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 03324

- D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang

- Miers and Lewis participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CO. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant COLETTE WOODARDS.

Judgment entered February 13, 2013.

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Hypersonic Test, Alaska's F-35s, Barrett Portrait UnveiledPublished May 27, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Mikayla Daly
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, a successful launch of a hypersonic weapon off the California Coast, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska marks the completion of their F-35A fleet, and former Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett is recognized for her accomplishments as her official portrait is unveiled at the Pentagon. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Benjamin Cooper)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Air Force conducts successful hypersonic weapon test****- Eielson AFB celebrates F-35 beddown completion****- 25th SecAF portrait unveiled during ceremony at Pentagon**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



B-52H Stratofortress 



hypersonic weapon test 



AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon 



354th FW 



F-35A Lightning II 



PACAF 



modernization 



Portrait 



Barbara Barrett 



Frank Kendall
EX-35.1
(logo) Bank of America

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION

Re: DBUBS 2011-LC3
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

In connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a
review of the Servicing activities, for the period ending December 31, 2012 and
of its performance under the Primary Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1,
2011 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, Bank of America, National Association has fulfilled all
of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the
aforementioned period.

Bank of America, National Association

/s/ Dean B. Roberson
Dean B Roberson
Director
---

VIA EDGAR

To:
    United States Securities and ExchangeCommissionRe:
    Tahoe Resources Inc. (the Company)Annual Report on Form 40-FConsent of Expert


This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the Annual
Report). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things,
the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the
Annual Information Form).

I, Jack Caldwell, P.E. of Robertson GeoConsultants Inc.,
Vancouver, British Columbia, hereby consent to:

| |  | the use of my name in connection with my
      involvement in the preparation of the technical report entitled Escobal
      Guatemala Project NI 43-101 Feasibility Studyissued on November 5,
      2014, with effective dates of January 23, 2014 for the Escobal Mineral
      Resource Estimate and July 1, 2014 for the Escobal Mineral Reserve
      Estimate (the Technical Report);
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| |  | references to the Technical Report, or portions
      thereof, in the Annual Information Form; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| |  | the inclusion and incorporation by reference of
  the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Dated the 12thday of
March, 2015



|                   
|-------------------
|Jack Caldwell, P.E.





---
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: MyEVAL Launch, NATO Air Policing, New Mobile Culture CoursesPublished Jan. 14, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Benjamin Cooper
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force highlights the new MyEval platform that’s replacing the existing VPC platform, the NATO Air Policing mission in the Baltic region and the launch of the Air Force Culture and Language Center’s new courses on Chinese and Russian culture. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Brittain Crolley)





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- DAF to launch myEval in 2022****- US F-16s strengthen air policing mission with long-planned Poland deployment****- AFCLC launches new introduction to China, Russia courses with certificates on Culture Guide app**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
#### The People v. Arthur Machen et al.

*Criminal law*— Attempt *to commit larceny*— Evidence.

In this case the evidence is held to have been insufficient to warrant a conviction.

Error to recorder’s court of Detroit. (Swift, J.)

Argued October 17, 1888.

Decided November 28, 1888.

Respondents were convicted of attempting to steal from an office in tbe day-time.

Reversed and prisoners discharged.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*George A. Chase,*for respondents.

*Moses Taggart,*Attorney General, for the people.

Sherwood, C. J.

The defendants in this case were tried' and convicted in the recorder’s court in the city of Detroit, of the crime of attempting to steal property from the lumber-office of Heck, Hemel & Eckhardt, in said city, in the day-time. The conviction was had under section 9423, How. Stat.

Hpon the hearing in this Court the Attorney General conceded there was error in the record. An inspection of the record shows there was no sufficient evidence given upon the trial upon which a conviction can be sustained, and the judgment must be reversed, and the prisoners discharged.

The other Justices concurred.
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME Page 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA-24-0062 

IN RE THE PARENTING OF E.C.F. AND E.H.F.

ELIZABETH FARNHAM, 

 Petitioner and Appellee,

v. 

ERIK FARNHAM, 

Respondent and Appellant.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County

Cause No. DR-32-2017-712

Before the Hon. Robert Deschamps and Standing Master Gail Bourguignon

Bradley J. Jones

BULMAN JONES & COOK PLLC

P.O. Box 8202

Missoula, MT 59807-8202

Attorney for Respondent/Appellant

Emily A. Lucas

Brandi R. Ries

RIES LAW GROUP, P.C.

P.O. Box 8364

Missoula, MT 59807

Attorney for Petitioner/Appellee

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time pursuant to 

Rule 26 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, and good cause appearing 

therefrom, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including May 10, 2024 to prepare, file and serve his opening brief. 

Electronically Signed Below

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 11 2024

04/11/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0062
[No. 43656-2-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### Gloria Peterson, et al., *Appellants,*v. Dale Bloomquist, DDS, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-19791-1, LeRoy McCullough, J., entered October 16, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Hanover Portfolio Acquisitions, Inc.****(the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:   April 16, 2013

/s/ Alan Collier

  

Chief Executive Officer , Interim Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director

 

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4902]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         REPUBLICAN PLAN UNFAIR TO MOST VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

  (Mr. WATT of North Carolina asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WATT of North Carolina. Mr. Speaker, as we approach the budget 
debate next week, I think it is important for the American people to 
put this in perspective.
  We have cut taxes now $600 to $700 billion over the next 10 years to 
benefit the wealthy peoples. Now we have got to come up with some cuts 
in the budget to offset that lost revenue, $600 to $700 billion, to 
offset cuts in taxes for rich people.
  Well, we started by trying to do that on the backs of poor people, 
and we realized that there was not enough money in poor people's 
programs to do that. So now, next week, we are turning our attention to 
our senior citizens, and we will try to finish this job under the 
Republican plan by balancing the budget on the backs of our senior 
citizens, poor people, senior citizens, balance the budget on their 
backs, my colleagues say. Unfair to our most vulnerable populations.

                          ____________________
```