alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22408]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Notice Changing the Date 
of the Country Practices Review Hearing

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of change of hearing date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 11, 2010, a public notice was published in the 
Federal Register on pages 48737-48738 announcing a public hearing to 
consider country practices petitions received in the 2009 Annual Review 
under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program. This notice 
announces a change in the hearing date and location, from September 24, 
2010, to September 28, 2010. The hearing will now be held at 1724 F 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9:30 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tameka Cooper, GSP Program, Office of 
the United States Trade Representative, 1724 F Street, NW., Room 601, 
Washington, DC 20508. The telephone number is (202) 395-6971, the fax 
number is (202) 395-2961, and the e-mail address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0155606c646a605e426e6e71647341747275732f646e712f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="782c19151d1319273b1717081d0a380d0b0c0a561d1708561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

Elena Bryan,
Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade and Development; 
Interim Chairman, GSP Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff Committee; 
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2010-22408 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W0-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered August 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00004-CR

JAQUALYN JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-41279-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On June 19, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the 

appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; 

(3) Kathleen Walsh explained that the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload and also 

stated she would be attending the Advanced Criminal Law Seminar July 22 through 25, 2013; 

and (4) Ms. Walsh requested thirty days from July 10, 2013 to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file her brief by MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 2013. We note the 

brief is already more than two months overdue and appellant has previously been granted a 

thirty-day extension of time to file the brief. Therefore, if appellant’s brief is not filed by the date 
specified, the Court will order Kathleen Walsh and the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office 

removed as counsel and will order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in 

this appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Gracie Lewis, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3; Katherine Drew, 

Appellate-Chief, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; Kathleen Walsh, Dallas County Public 

Defender’s Office; and Michael Casillas, Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

d0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146796

KENNETH UNCAPHER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146796

COA: 310630

Ingham CC: 11-001064-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
One Belvedere Place, Suite 330
Mill Valley, California 94941


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master
Servicer and Securities Administrator (in such capacity, "Wells Fargo"), hereby
certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2012 (the
"reporting period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.


October 30, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
JULIE EICHLER
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011, by and among
SEQUOIA RESIDENTIAL FUNDING, INC., as Depositor and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as Trustee relating to the Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2 Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2011-2

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not applicable

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### JOSEPH FILOS v. GROUP FINANCIAL INVESTORS.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Public Announcement Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., September 9, 2010.

PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The following matters have been placed on the 
agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:
    1. Approval of Minutes May 6, 2010 Quarterly Business Meeting.
    2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners and Section 
Administrators.
    3. Consideration of proposed rule regarding rating of crack cocaine 
offenses.
    4. Conditions for sex offenders.

AGENCY CONTACT: Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, 
United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

    Dated: September 3, 2010.
Rockne J. Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-22690 Filed 9-8-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
financial statements in the Registrant's Form 10-Q and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financail statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000                         
       
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS           
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   21,732   
<SECURITIES>                                                  0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                            66,625   
<ALLOWANCES>                                             10,365   
<INVENTORY>                                              18,094   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        161,608   
<PP&E>                                                  543,774   
<DEPRECIATION>                                          184,141   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          820,586   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    74,964   
<BONDS>                                                 199,846   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0   
<PREFERRED>                                                   0   
<COMMON>                                                    367   
<OTHER-SE>                                               15,730   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            820,586   
<SALES>                                                 191,364   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        210,152   
<CGS>                                                    16,231   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            39,951   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        138,142   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       31,806   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          88,490   
<INCOME-TAX>                                             41,439   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0   
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          (3,971)  
<CHANGES>                                                     0   
<NET-INCOME>                                             43,080   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              1.15   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              1.12   
                                                        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2












ADDENDUM NO 6


to


MASTER MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT dated February 7th, 2008 between Euroseas Ltd and Eurobulk Ltd







This Addendum is made as of February 4th 2014 between Euroseas Ltd. (the "Company"), in its own capacity and as agent for each of its vessel owning subsidiaries identified in Schedule A hereto together with any additional subsidiaries that may acquire vessels in the future (the "Subsidiaries") and Eurobulk Ltd. (the "Manager").







REMUNERATION







Daily management fees were kept at Euro 685/day/vessel (including the 5% discount applied when the numbers of vessels wholly of partly owned by Euroseas and managed by Eurobulk exceeds 20; else the daily management fee per vessel is Euro 720); while executive services fees increases to US$ 2,000,000. As previously agreed, daily management fees for vessels in lay-up are set at 50% of the fees when vessel is in operation, i.e. Euro 342.50 /day/vessel (or, Euro 360 /day/vessel in absence of the 5% discount); daily management fees for vessels under construction start being paid from the later of the day that vessel construction commences (i.e. steel cutting), or the moment the newbuilding contract is acquired (in case of contract re-sales).







Master Management Agreement was renewed for a five year term starting January 1, 2014. The term of the individual vessel management agreements will coincide with the term of the Master Management Agreement as set herein.







For the avoidance of doubt, it is mentioned that whilst this agreement is in place, management fees of all subsidiary shipowning companies are as specified in the Master Management Agreement as hereby amended.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum to the Management Agreement as of the date first written above.

















	
 

	
Euroseas Ltd.


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Name:

	
Aristides J. Pittas

	
 


	
 

	
Title:

	
CEO

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Eurobulk Ltd.


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Name:

	
Nikolaos Pittas

	
 


	
 

	
Title:

	
Director
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00686-CV

Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellant

v.

City of Dallas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GV-10-000836, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

I respectfully dissent.

I agree with the well-reasoned opinion of the Amarillo Court of Appeals in City

of Dallas v. Abbott, 279 S.W.3d 806 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2007), rev’d on other grounds,

304 S.W.3d 380 (Tex. 2010). There, the court held that the mere fact that requested materials

constitute attorney-client communication is not enough, by itself, to demonstrate a “compelling

reason” to withhold disclosure under section 552.302 of the Government Code. Id. at 810-12. In

the present case, the City presented no evidence whatsoever that a disclosure of the materials would

harm third parties and only vague, speculative evidence that the City itself could be harmed. For all

intents and purposes, the City relied exclusively on the fact that the materials arguably fell within

the attorney-client privilege. I do not believe that is enough. Accordingly, I do not believe the City

met its burden of conclusively showing a “compelling reason” for nondisclosure.
The majorityrelies on a statement contained in a footnote in City of Garland v. Dallas

Morning News, 22 S.W.3d 351, 360 n.5 (Tex. 2000). But not only was the referenced statement

dictum (as the majority concedes), it was dictum in a plurality opinion. Plurality opinions have

virtually no precedential value. See University of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston v. York,

871 S.W.2d 175, 176-77 (Tex. 1994).

I would reverse the trial court’s judgment.

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Filed: December 23, 2014

2
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of VII Peaks Co-Optivist Income
BDC II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Gurpreet S. Chandhoke, the Chief Executive Officer and President, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated this 5th Day of November, 2018. | By: | /s/ Gurpreet S. Chandhoke            
|------------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                                      |     | Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                
|                                      |     | Chairman of the Board of Directors,  
|                                      |     | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                      |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 404 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 404

 To preserve the Green Mountain Lookout in the Glacier Peak Wilderness 
             of the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2013

  Mrs. Murray (for herself and Ms. Cantwell) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To preserve the Green Mountain Lookout in the Glacier Peak Wilderness 
             of the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Green Mountain Lookout Heritage 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF LEGAL AUTHORITY OF GREEN MOUNTAIN LOOKOUT.

    (a) Legal Authority of Lookout.--Section 4(b) of the Washington 
State Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-339; 98 Stat. 300; 16 
U.S.C. 1131 note) is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting the following: ``, and except that with respect to the lands 
described in section 3(5), the designation of such lands as a 
wilderness area shall not preclude the operation and maintenance of 
Green Mountain Lookout.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Washington State 
Wilderness Act of 1984.

SEC. 3. PRESERVATION OF GREEN MOUNTAIN LOOKOUT LOCATION.

    The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the 
Forest Service, may not move Green Mountain Lookout from its current 
location on Green Mountain in the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National 
Forest unless the Secretary determines that moving Green Mountain 
Lookout is necessary to preserve the Lookout or to ensure the safety of 
individuals on or around Green Mountain. If the Secretary makes such a 
determination, the Secretary shall move the Green Mountain Lookout to a 
location outside of the lands described in section 3(5) of the 
Washington State Wilderness Act of 1984 and designated as a wilderness 
area in section 4(b) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force announces second set of new scholarships for HBCU studentsPublished Aug. 11, 2020
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force announced this week it has extended more than 100 scholarship offers to new students attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the fall of 2020, as part of its efforts to increase diversity in its officer ranks.The Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps coordinated with leadership within Junior ROTC and its aviation program, the AFJROTC Flight Academy, to find rising college freshmen that had demonstrated leadership ability, aviation competencies, a propensity to serve in the U.S. military and an interest in attending an HBCU.“Air Force senior leadership wants to drive opportunities for both our Department, in how we embrace a more inclusive culture, and for our ROTC students to rise to an academic challenge,” said Brig. Gen. Leslie A. Maher, commander of the Jeanne M. Holm Center for Officer Accessions and Citizen Development. “Thus, in coordination with the Diversity & Inclusion Task Force, the leadership requested something new and bold from ROTC in order to pursue increasing the diversity of accessions through the ROTC program.”As part of this program, students who remain in good standing with ROTC at HBCUs will receive four-year, Type 1 scholarships that cover full tuition and fees, and provide an annual book stipend. Students offered the scholarships come from a full spectrum of racial, ethnic and gender categories, as required by law, however Air Force leadership have highlighted the benefits of targeting particular institutions.“Although HBCUs make up a small percentage of our nation’s colleges and universities, they have historically graduated a large percentage of Black/African-Americans with STEM degrees,” said Col. Christopher Bennett, Air Force ROTC commander. “Additionally, because the student bodies of HBCUs tend to have a higher percentage of racial and ethnic diversity, students at those schools have more opportunities to learn from the valuable insights of their peers that should help them be better leaders to all the diverse Airmen they will be responsible to lead.”Some of the students chosen to receive these scholarships had been vetted through the competitive Flight Academy selection process, and had been assessed by program commanders to have demonstrated leadership traits the Air Force is looking for in its officer corps. All the scholarship students will meet the standards of ROTC scholarship recipients to keep the scholarship through their school tenure and commission upon graduation.To learn more about the AFROTC program to include scholarships, check out the website here.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp 



AFJROTC Flight Academy 



AFROTC 



ROTC 



Diversity & Inclusion Task Force 



historically black college 



HBC 



HBCU 



AFJROTC 



Flight Academy 



stem