alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Project NEXUS tests developing technologically ready Airmen

              - Published  July 18, 2019
              -                             By 2nd Lt. Robert Guest                                                    
              - Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs

**AUSTIN, Texas (AFNS) --  **
Air Education and Training Command officials began a beta test aimed at learning the best ways to introduce more technologically ready Airmen into units July 9, in Austin, Texas. The program, Project NEXUS, is expected to fuel organic technology problem solving efforts for Airmen in their day-to-day workplaces.From July to November 2019, 18 Airmen will study data science, software development, or UI/UX design in Project NEXUS, an Air Force beta program created by AETC’s Technology Integration Detachment and hosted by AFWERX-Austin.“Project NEXUS will drive internal AETC expertise in modern data science and mobile design and development,” said Capt. Kyle Palko, Project NEXUS project manager. “It will empower Airmen to become elite digital professionals who deliver strategic data and development capabilities.”The three cohorts of six Airmen, who come from various Air Force specialties and backgrounds, will either specialize in data science, software development or application design.“After the 120-day training at Project NEXUS, participants will return to their home units armed with the skills to more effectively solve their career field’s operational problems,” Palko said. “If the Project NEXUS prototype ends up delivering outsized output and capable personnel and can scale cost effectively, then we could look at scaling up Air Force-wide. If not, it would still be a success because we'll take lessons learned and roll them into other Air Force initiatives.”A technology boot camp-style of training was chosen for Project NEXUS because its learn-by-doing focus has already proven viable in the open market. It also allowed Project NEXUS to source training from existing technology boot camp companies.“Each cohort will train and study but also build a final, real-world capstone project that solves a data science or software development problem in AETC,” said Lt. Col. Eric Frahm, director for AETC’s Technology Integration Detachment. “These technology boot camps are the backbone of the modern industry and we’re bringing those tools into the Air Force.”Project NEXUS is another way that AETC and Air Force officials are looking at further empowering the Air Force’s greatest resource: the Airmen, Frahm said.

FSProject NexusAETCAir Education and Training Commandtechnologyproblem solvingAFAir Forcedata sciencesoftware developmentUI/UX designprofessional developmenttrainingeducation
[No. 44747-5-I.

Division One.

May 8, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Bradley John Tarrant, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-1-00684-1, George N. Bowden, J., entered May 12, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 16 - 00266 - CR NO. 02 - 16 - 00267 - CR

JOHN JOSEPH JORDAN APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 78TH DISTRI CT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO S . 56,639

- B, 57,450

- B

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant John Joseph Jo rdan attempts to appeal from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, Oxycodone, and his conviction for the theft of property worth less than $2,500, enhanced by two prior convictions. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (West 20 1 0 ), Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03 (West Supp. 2016)

. Appellant pleaded guilty in both cases pursuant to

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

plea bargains, and in accordance with the plea bargains, Appellant was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for the possession conviction and 18 months’ imprison ment for the theft conviction. The trial court’s certification of his right to appeal in each case states that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the d efendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Te x. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). By letter dated July 11, 2016, we notifie d Appellant his appeals could be
dismissed based on the trial court’s certification unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before July 21, 2016, s howing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. No response has been filed. In accordance with the trial court’s certifications, we therefore dismiss Appellant’s appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE S UDDERTH JUSTICE
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 18, 2016
#### E. L. & R. R. R. Co. v. O. S. Davis.

(No. 1180, Op. Book No. 3, p. 146.)

Error from Hopkins County.

November 23, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 563. *Appeal bond in justice’s court; approval of.*Appellant appealed from a judgment of a justice of the peace to the county court, where the appeal was dismissed because it did not appear that the appeal bond had been approved by the justice. The bond, though not appearing to have been approved, was marked filed by the justice. *Held,*the bond having been marked filed by the justice, and appearing in the record as an appeal bond, it will be presumed that it was approved by him, and the court erred in dismissing the appeal. [McLane v. Russell, 29 Tex. 128.]

Eeversed and remanded.
#### J. H. Brent and Sureties v. Hohorst, Traufels & Co.

(No. 205, Op. Book No. 1, p. 647.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

June 15, 1878.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 848. *Sureties on sheriff’s bond; liability of .*By their undertaking and obligation, the sureties upon the sheriff’s bond were only liable for his acts done in his official capacity. When the parties, by their agreement, took the property attached out of the custody of the law and authorized the sheriff to sell it without reference to the legal proceedings pending, he simply became, in making the sale, their trustee and agent, as any other private individual would have been who might have been selected by them for that purpose. When he appropriated the funds arising from the sale, it was a breach of this private trust, and not an act of official misconduct for which he and his sureties could be held liable upon his official bond. There was no cause of action against the sureties.

Beversed and remanded.
[No. 43444-6-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### Robert S. Lint, II, *Respondent,*v. Virginia Schloredt, et al., *Intervenors,*Gary W. East, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 97-2-03298-7, John M. Meyer, J., entered August 26, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, J., concurred in by Coleman and Kennedy, JJ.
#### BIELANSKI CORP. v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 44523-5-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### Michael Rowley, *Appellant,*v. David L. Barnard, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-24343-2, Ann Schindler, J., entered February 11, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Interpersonal Violence Survey, Disparity Review Addendum, New PT Test OptionsPublished Nov. 19, 2021
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force highlights the results of the interpersonal violence survey and task force, an addendum that adds clarity to the recent disparity reviews and new alternative components to the fitness assessment that take effect in January 2022. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann)  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:**- Department of the Air Force releases findings on Interpersonal Violence survey****- Department of the Air Force releases addendum to Disparity Review****- Air Force releases alternate component fitness score charts**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
## NO S . 12

- 1 1

- 00 2 11

- CR

12

- 11

- 00212

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

KATHRYN LYNNE GREEN

, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § S MITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM
Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver

(methamphetamine in the amount of four grams or more but less than two hundred grams) and

unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain

agreement w ith the State, the trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for twenty years and

seven years, respectively. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

We have received the trial court's certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and

Appellant has no right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). The certification is signed by

Appellant and her trial counsel. The clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification. See

Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accor dingly, we dismiss the

appeal.

Opinion delivered July 20 , 2011.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5090]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             A HISTORIC VOTE TO BALANCE THE FEDERAL DEFICIT

  (Mr. GOSS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. GOSS. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the distinguished gentleman from 
Lakewood, OH [Mr. Hoke].
  Mr. HOKE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding to me.
  Mr. Speaker, tomorrow we are going to do something that is so 
historic, that is so extraordinary, that is so unique, that has not 
been done in 26 years. Tomorrow we are going to take a vote, and in 
fact, we will balance the Federal budget for the first time in 26 
years.
  What does it mean? What does it mean back in Cleveland? It means 
safer streets. It means more hope. It means greater opportunity. It 
means better education. It means more prosperity for our children, for 
our grandchildren. It means preserving this Nation for the next 
generation.
  Mr. Speaker, we are going to hear so much bitterness from the other 
side, and it is a great tragedy of this period in American history that 
there is so much talent and there is so much intelligence and there is 
so much good feeling and belief, and yet all that can be offered is so 
much bitterness and defense of the status quo.
  Tomorrow will be the most historic vote of this 104th Congress.

                          ____________________
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00022-CV

Kathie Grustein

v.

Steve R. Overton

On Appeal from the

198th Judicial District Court of Bandera County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV-15-0000094

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant, Kathie Grustein.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 28, 2019
Order filed, June 29, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00534-CR

____________

EX PARTE KAMILAH A HAMILTON, Appellant

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1569096A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 22, 2018. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jill Hanby, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kings Road Entertainment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin
DeFrank, President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kings Road
Entertainment, Inc., and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                               /s/ Geraldine Blecker
Dated:  July 15, 2004                          _________________________________
                                               By:  Geraldine Blecker
                                               Its:  Chief Executive Officer



                                               /s/ H. Martin DeFrank
Dated:  July 15, 2004                          _________________________________
                                               By:  H. Martin DeFrank
                                               Its:  Chief Financial Officer
#### H. Lyon & Sons v. A. Kempinski.

(No. 1173, Op. Book No. 3, p. 429.)

Appeal from Tarrant County.

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§ 79. *Suit upon notes; notes need not be attached to petition.*Where a petition describes a note sued upon by its date, amount, time when payable, name of maker and payee, rate of interest, and indorsement to plaintiff, it is unnecessary to attach or file the note as a part of the petition; and when the petition alleges that the note is attached and filed as a part thereof, but in fact the note *35was not so attached and filed, the allegation may be treated as surplusage, and the note may be read in evidence the same as if no such allegation had been made.

June 12, 1880.

§ 80. *Promissory note; indorsement and delivery; proof of.*A note made payable to the maker thereof, and indorsed by him in blank, can be recovered upon by the holder without proof of indorsement and delivery. The production of the note by the holder, with the indorsement thereon, *prima facie*entitles him to recover. [Greneaux v. Wheeler, 6 Tex. 515.]

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Operation Christmas Drop 2022Published Dec. 23, 2022
                        
                        By Tech Sgt. Eric Mann
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                This week’s look around the Air Force, highlights the 71st annual Operation Christmas Drop, a humanitarian event that brings U.S. and partner nations together to provide food, tools and clothing to more than 56 remote islands in the South-Eastern Pacific. (Hosted by Tech Sgt. Eric Mann)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related link:**- US Pacific Air Forces’ multinational mission Operation Christmas Drop delivers humanitarian supplies to 20k islanders.**Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



OCD22 



Operation Christmas Drop 



HADR 



Humanitarian
Order entered June 24 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01497
- CV
IN RE J.H. WALKER, INC. D/ B/A J.H. WALKER TRUC KING, Relator Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 00661



### O RDER By order dated November 25, 2014 we abated this proceeding pursuant to rule 7.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the successor judge to reconsider the ruling of the trial court. The parties have advise d the Court that the successor judge has determined that the order of her predecessor in office that is the subject of this mandamus proceeding shall remain in effect . Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1006-E1007]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        TRIBUTE TO MORTON GOULD: COMPOSER, CONDUCTOR, AND FRIEND

                                 ______

                            HON. BART GORDON

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 11, 1995
  Mr. GORDON. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to highlight merely a few of 
the countless accomplishments in my dear friend Morton Gould's 
distinguished career, recently capped off by his receipt of the 
Pulitzer Prize for music composition.
  A New York native, Gould began this career at the early age of six, 
when his first composition was published. His tutelage in piano and 
composition continued, and by age 21, he was conducting and arranging 
weekly orchestra radio programs for the WOR Mutual Network.
  Perhaps Gould's most performed instrumental piece is his ``Pavanne,'' 
from his ``Second Symphonette.'' Other works familiar to all of us 
include ``Latin-American Symphonette,'' ``Spirituals for Orchestra,'' 
``Tap Dance Concerto,'' ``Jekyll and Hyde Variations,'' and ``American 
Salute.''
  The Library of Congress has commissioned his work, as well as the 
Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center, The New York City Ballet, and 
the American Ballet Theater. He has composed scores for Broadway 
musicals, films, and both television movies and series.
  Conductors worldwide have had the pleasure of directing performances 
of his compositions, and, as conductor, Gould has appeared with major 
orchestras in the United States, Japan, Australia, and Israel.
  Some of Gould's other awards include a Grammy Award, several Grammy 
nominations, the 1983 Gold Baton Award, the 1985 Medal of Honor for 
Music from the National Arts Club, and the Kennedy Center Honors in 
1994. He received the Pulitzer Prize this year for ``Stringmusic,'' 
which was composed at the [[Page E1007]] request of Director 
Rostropovich, to commemorate his last season as director of the 
Washington, DC, National Symphony Orchestra.
  Gould served as president of ASCAP [American Society of Composers, 
Authors and Publishers] from 1986 to 1994. He has been an ASCAP member 
since 1935 and a board member since 1959.
  Certainly we have all benefited over the years from his work and know 
that future generations will benefit as well. Please join me today in 
honoring one of America's truest virtuosos.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                         REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

                                                               Kingman, Arizona,
                                                              September 16, 2001

SELLER(S):

HR INVESTMENTS, a Nevada Partnership and CTR Trust, Thomas R. Reingruber, as
Trustee.

BUYER(S):

MICHAEL A. PATTERSON, a married man as his sole and separate property, and JEFF
CIACHURSKI, a married man as his sole and separate property, AND/OR NOMINEES.

TERMS:

Received from Michael Patterson and Jeff Ciachurski the sum of $2,500.00,
evidenced by a personal check as deposit, in escrow with Chigago Title Insurance
Co., Kingman AZ, said check deposited on account towards the purchase price of
$110,000.00 for the purchase of property situated in Mojave County, Arizona,
described as follows:

The North half (N1/2) of Section 3 and the North half of the Southwest quarter
(N1/2 SW1/4) of Section 3. Township 25 North, Range 16 West of the Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, Mojave County, Arizona. Total 400 +- acres.

The balance of the Terms of the Purchase Agreement are as follows:

Close of Escrow will be on or before January 2,2002. Possession shall be
delivered to Buyer upon Close of Escrow.

Buyer will pay $60,000 on or before January 2,2002. Seller will carry back an
interest free note in the amount $50,000, all payable in full on or before March
31, 2002. In the event Buyer fails to meet the March 31,2002 due date, Buyer and
Seller agree that interest on $50,000 will begin to accrue at the rate of Ten
percent (10%) per annum until paid in full.

Seller guarantees property to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances at
the close of Escrow.

Buyer agrees to pay 100% of Escrow Fees and Title Insurance.

Seller to pay all pro-rated property taxes and assessments until the date of
the Close of Escrow.

<PAGE>

This agreement is subject to buyers approval of a Title Report upon the subject
property(ies).

The undersign acknowledge receipt of a copy hereof, and authorize a copy to be
delivered to Chicago Title Company, Kingman AZ, for escrow to be opened.

BUYER: -s- Michael A. Patterson
       -------------------------------------------------------
       For Michael A. Patterson and Jeff Ciachurski

SELLER -s- Thomas R. Reingruber
       -------------------------------------------------------
       For HR Investments and CTR Trust

<PAGE>

This agreement is subject to buyers approval of a Title Report upon the subject
property(ies).

The undersign acknowledge receipt of a copy hereof, and authorize a copy to be
delivered to Chicago Title Company, Kingman AZ, for escrow to be opened.

BUYER: -s- Michael A. Patterson
       -------------------------------------------------------
       For Michael A. Patterson and Jeff Ciachurski

SELLER -s- Thomas R. Reingruber
       -------------------------------------------------------
       For HR Investments and CTR Trust