alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5089]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   WHY ARE REPUBLICANS GOUGING MEDICARE TO PAY FOR TAX CUTS FOR THE 
                            PRIVILEGED FEW?

  (Mr. WISE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WISE. Mr. Speaker, why are Republicans gouging Medicare to pay 
for tax breaks for the privileged few? Why do they cut almost $300 
billion in Medicare to senior citizens for tax breaks, of which only 
1\1/2\ percent of those tax breaks go to families under $20,000? 
Incidentally, 50 percent goes to families over $100,000. Yet the 
Medicare cuts go to 100 percent of all senior citizens.
  Why are Republicans cutting the student loan program to pay for tax 
breaks for the privileged few? Here are petitions signed by thousands 
of West Virginia high school and college students and parents asking 
Congress not to cut the student loan program, not to cut their future. 
We do not have to be Phi Beta Kappas to know that giving already 
wealthy Americans a tax break while denying students a chance just to 
be middle income simply is not fair.
  Mr. Speaker, budgets reflect values. Slashing Medicare, cutting 
student loans, Americans want the budget balanced, but not on the backs 
of American values.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     466,100
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,232
<PP&E>                                   7,763,173
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,601,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,922,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      206,775
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,449,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             5,922,786
<SALES>                                    306,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           329,354
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              290,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            51,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (12,979)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (12,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0    
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (12,979)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (1.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.98)   
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Masateru Higashida, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of NuZee, Inc.;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.    Date:April 29, 2018NUZEE, INC.By:/s/ Masateru HigashidaMasateru Higashida, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  61605-00002/3169910.3
SCWC

- 19

- 0000 261

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

LOYALTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD.

, Respondent / Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

vs.

WALLACE S.J. CHING

, individually and in his capacity

as a Director of Loyalty Development Company, Ltd.,

Petitioner / Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 19

- 0000 261 ; C IVIL NO. 16

- 1

- 1580 )

ORDE R ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appellant Wallace S.J. Ching ’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 13 , 2024

, is

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. T he

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding

scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, October 3 , 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000261

03-OCT-2024

03:22 PM

Dkt. 15 OGAC
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUIS A. PERRETTA, JR.; FRANK 

PERRETTA, No. 06-15526

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

v. CV-05-02987-WHA  Northern District of PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT

California, COMPANY, INC.; SANFORD N.

San Francisco DILLER; JOHN J. MURPHY; VICKI R.

MULLINS, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees. 

Filed May 23, 2008

Before: David R. Thompson and Milan D. Smith, Jr.,

Circuit Judges, and William Q. Hayes,* District Judge.

ORDER

The Defendants-Appellees’ motion to file a reply is

GRANTED.

The Defendants-Appellees’ Petition for Panel Rehearing is

GRANTED. The opinion dated March 27, 2008, is withdrawn. 

The court requests supplemental briefing by the parties

regarding the applicability of the ratification provision of Cal.

Corp. Code § 16103(b)(3) to the issue of whether the vote in

this case was sufficient to ratify the transaction. The simulta-

*The Honorable William Q. Hayes, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of California, sitting by designation. 

6091
neous briefs may not exceed twenty (20) pages, and shall be

due no later than June 13, 2008.

6092 PERRETTA v. PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Exhibit 15.2



漢 坤 律 師
事 務 所



Han Kun Law Offices
Suite 906, Office Tower C1, Oriental Plaza, 1 East Chang An Avenue, Beijing 100738, P. R. China
Tel : (86 10) 8525 5500; Fax : (86 10) 8525 5511 / 8525 5522



Date: April 19, 2019



58.com Inc.



Building 105, 10 Jiuxianqiao North Road
Jia|
Chaoyang District
Beijing 100015
People’s Republic of China



Dear Sir/Madam:



We hereby consent to the use of our name
and the summary of our opinion under the captions, “Risk Factors” in Item 3 and “Organizational Structure”
in Item 4, included in the annual report of 58.com Inc. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual
Report”), which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of April 2019, and further consent
to the incorporation by reference of the summaries of our opinions under these captions into Registration Statements on Form S-8
(File No. 333-194873, File No. 333-205011 and File No. 333-229098) of 58.com Inc. We also consent to the filing with the SEC of
this consent letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report.



Yours Sincerely,



|/s/ Han Kun Law Offices | 
|----------------------- | 
|Han Kun Law Offices     |
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 1 

CAUSE NO. DC-13-14961 

TXU ENERGY RETAIL COMPANY LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

FORT BEND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

116TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiff TXU Energy Retail Company L.L.C. (TXU) desires to appeal from the Order 

granting Defendant Fort Bend Independent School District’s Second Plea to the Jurisdiction and 

Motion for Summary Judgment dated November 24, 2015.

TXU appeals to the Fifth District Court of Appeals. 

FILED

DALLAS COUNTY

12/14/2015 2:38:22 PM

FELICIA PITRE

DISTRICT CLERK

Bridgette Vation

05-15-01520-CV

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/15/2015 9:17:05 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

 GRUBER HURST JOHANSEN HAIL SHANK LLP

 By: /s/ John Franklin Guild 

 Michael K. Hurst 

 State Bar No. 10316310 

 mhurst@ghjhlaw.com 

 A. Shonn Brown 

 State Bar No. 24007164 

 sbrown@ghjhlaw.com 

 John Franklin Guild 

 State Bar No. 24041022 

 jguild@ghjhlaw.com 

Jonathan R. Childers 

 State Bar No. 24050411 

 jchilders@ghjhlaw.com 

 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 

 Dallas, Texas 75202 

 Telephone No. (214) 855-6800 

 Facsimile No. (214) 855-6808 

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TXU ENERGY 

 RETAIL COMPANY LLC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been served 

upon all counsel of record via eservice on this 14th day of December, 2015 as set forth below: 

Richard A. Morris 

rmorris@rmgllp.com 

Jonathan G. Brush 

jbrust@rmgllp.com

Stephanie E. Maher 

smaher@rmgllp.com

Robers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P. 

5718 Westheimer, Suite 1200 

Houston, Texas 77057 

/s/ John Franklin Guild 

John Franklin Guild
[No. 43854-9-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Allan Wesley Parmelee, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-03026-3, Nicole Maclnnes, J., entered November 19, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 SecAF visits Nellis AFB Airmen, experiences Red Flag exercisePublished July 26, 2017
                        
                        By Senior Airman Kevin Tanenbaum
                        
                        
                        99th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev.(AFNS) --**
                
Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson visited Nellis and Creech Air Force Bases, Nevada from July 17-21, 2017 to meet with Airmen and witness Red Flag, the U.S. Air Force‘s premiere multi-domain integration training exercise.
 
Wilson’s priorities of readiness and innovation were bolstered through the experiences she had during her week in southern Nevada.
 
“Nellis [AFB] is where we bring readiness together,” said Wilson. “Not only is it where we test new things, but it’s where Airmen have a chance to come together and practice the high-end fight.”
 
Not only was Wilson able to see how Red Flag readies the Air Force for future threats, but she also saw firsthand how Nellis AFB remains at the forefront of modernization.
 
“I spent three days here at Nellis [AFB], and test and evaluation is a big part of the mission,” said Wilson. “This is where we test the newest things we’ve developed, and we push the envelope on innovation. We’re seeing innovation by Airmen every day here, and it’s great to witness.”
 
Wilson came to Nellis AFB at the peak of its training exercises, giving her the opportunity to see how the Airmen and joint partners at Red Flag are training through innovation.
 
“Multi-domain command and control is one of the areas in which we need to innovate,” said Wilson. “It starts to come together here first. Those are the things that were most evident to me witnessing Red Flag, the complexity of it, integrating all kinds of air, space and cyber power in order to prevail in very difficult high-end fights.”
 
Training the warfighter in all aspects of air, space and cyber was just part of the experience of watching the exercise. Wilson also took time to talk about how fascinated she was by Airmen.
 
“The amount of responsibility and the amount of training that we give to young Airmen, and then the responsibility we put on their shoulders for decision-making is impressive to me,” she said. “They shoulder the burden, and they protect the country.”SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Heather Wilson 



nellis afb 



Creech AFB 



red flag 



innovation 



F-35 



ACC 



multi-domain C2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4675]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          REPUBLICANS MEAN TO PRE- SERVE AND IMPROVE MEDICARE

  (Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, the Clinton administration's 
Trustees Report on Medicare warns that the Medicare trust fund starts 
to go broke in 1996 and is bankrupt by 2002. House Republicans are 
determined to save Medicare by using new approaches, new management, 
and new technologies to improve it, preserve it, and protect it. The 
current Government-controlled Health Care Financing Administration 
system has a lot of waste and fraud. The General Accounting Office 
estimates $44 billion a year in Medicare and Medicaid fraud.
  We want to give senior citizens an incentive to fight waste and fraud 
by paying them 25 percent of any waste or fraud they find in their own 
bills. House Republicans want to strengthen and empower senior 
citizens.
  House Republicans will increase Medicare spending from $4,700 per 
retiree today to $6,300 per retiree in 2002. That is a 34-percent 
increase in Medicare spending per retiree. There is no proposed cut in 
Medicare spending.
  House Republicans will preserve the current Medicare system. We will 
create a series of new choices so senior citizens can control their own 
future.
  Mr. Speaker, together we can create a Medicare system that offers the 
best care at the lowest cost, with senior citizens having the greatest 
control over their own health care.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<RESTATED>
<CIK>  0000772320
<NAME>  CASMYN CORP.



<PAGE>

<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 	6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>           OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>			                      1,056
<SECURITIES>                      25
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,742
<ALLOWANCES>	                   (795)
<INVENTORY> 	                    890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               2,912
<PP&E>				                    17,594
<DEPRECIATION>	                 (533)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	               23,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>   		     7,308
<BONDS>		                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>			                      514
<OTHER-SE>                    11,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  23,837
<SALES>					                   1,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,497
<CGS>				                      1,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  3,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                432
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                15
<INCOME-PRETAX>		             (2,596)
<INCOME-TAX>			                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,596)
<DISCONTINUED>		                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	                   0
<CHANGES>		                        0
<NET-INCOME>		                (2,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>	                 (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0

        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,244<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,856
<PP&E>                                          15,764<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,324
<BONDS>                                        130,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           322<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,711<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,918
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,801<F5>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,798<F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,169<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                       730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<FN>
<F1> REFLECTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2> REFLECTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F3> COMPRISED OF COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B STOCK.
<F4> REFLECTED NET OF TREASURY STOCK.
<F5> COMPRISED OF NET REVENUES.
<F6> COMPRISED OF OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES EXCLUDING
        DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F7> COMPRISED OF: (A) DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION, AND (B) 
        CORPORATE GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

Promissory Note

 

Contracting party: Success Holding Group Corp. USA._

(hereinafter referred to as Party A)

 

Celebritv Enterorise Co. Ltd

(hereinafter referred to as Party B)

 

WHEREAS both parties issue the Promissory Note follow by the loan’s terms & condition:

 

I. Party A is agree to loan One Million dollars to Party B a t the time to issue this covenant.

 

II. The covenant is Interest-free from August 18th, 2014 to August 17th, 2016 end.

 

III. Part B shall start the payment of 90,000 dollars from 2015 on the 30th of every month until paid off the loan.

 

IIII. The period fails to repay, Party B will pay an annual interest rate of 3% .

 

Contracting Party A: Success Holding Group Corp. USA

 

Loaner Signature:

Date: August 18th, 2014

 

Contracting Party B: Celebrity Enterprise Co. Ltd.

 

Borrower Signature:

Date: August 18th, 2014
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2019

No. 04-18-00974-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.G., J.G., AND J.G., CHILDREN,

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-1222-CV-D

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this parental rights termination suit initiated by the children’s grandparents, the court 

reporter advised this court that Appellant has not paid for the record and Appellant is not entitled 

to a free record. 

On January 18, 2019, we ordered Appellant to timely provide written proof to this court 

that (1) the reporter’s record has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s 

fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. 

In her response, Appellant makes no mention of any arrangement to pay the reporter’s fee 

or her right to a free record. Instead, she asserts that the trial court erred in denying her motion 

for continuance, the error was harmful, and she prays that her response be accepted and for other 

relief consistent with her response.

Given Appellant’s response, we conclude Appellant is not entitled to a free reporter’s 

record and she has chosen to proceed without a reporter’s record.

We ORDER Appellant to file an appellate brief with this court within TWENTY DAYS 

of the date of this order. The brief must fully comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See, e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 9, 38. If the brief fails to comply with the applicable rules, 

Appellant’s brief may be stricken and Appellant ordered to file an amended brief. 

The court will only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellant’s 

brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Justyn Howard, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sprout Social, Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 SPROUT SOCIAL, INC.By:/s/ Justyn HowardName:Justyn HowardTitle:President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
 Date: February 27, 2020