alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Franklin v. Henry Hurlbert.

(No. 1281, Op. Book No. 2, p. 628.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§816. *Landlord and tenant; the latter cannot dispute the title of the former; exceptions to this rule stated.*It is a well settled general rule that a lessee cannot deny the title of his landlord, and this rule applies whether the tenant was in possession before the lease was made *467or not. So long as he remains in undisturbed possession he is estopped from attacking the title under which he entered, unless his entry was induced by the fraud of the landlord or by a mistake in the execution of the lease, or unless the lease was made for purposes in violation of law. The estoppel only exists during his tenancy, express or implied; after that is ended, whether by surrender or otherwise, he may set up title in himself or in a third person. A tenant for years, holding over after his term lias expired, is treated as holding as tenant upon the terms of the former lease, and he remains subject to the estoppel. [Wood’s Landlord and Tenant, § 236 et seq. j Among exceptions to the general rule as stated above are the following: When the estate which the landlord held vests in the lessee, whether by purchase from the lessor or by a purchase under valid legal proceedings, the tenant may set up this title in defense to any action brought against him by the lessor, either to recover possession of the premises or to' recover after accruing rent, and, indeed, in all cases it is competent for the tenant to show that the landlord’s title has terminated, as that the premises have been sold under foreclosure proceedings, under execution or for taxes, or, indeed, that the title of the landlord has, from any cause, expired. So a tenant is not estopped.when he has been induced to take a lease from the landlord by his fraud or misrepresentation, or under a misapprehension or mistake. Neither is he estopped from setting up a paramount title in another, when he has been evicted or a judgment of eviction has been obtained against him, nor when the payment of rent by him was merely gratuitous. The foregoing rules not having been observed in the trial of the case in the-court below, the judgment was erroneous.

March 22, 1882.

Eeversed and remanded.

Note. — A motion for rehearing in the foregoing case was determined at the Galveston Term, 1883, of the court. [See *ante,*§ 203.] Opinion delivered by Willson, J.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS E. PARSON.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Space Force Base Preferences, Legacy Aviation Bonus, Malicious EMailPublished June 16, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the Space Force announces preferred locations for units, some pilots can apply now for special bonus pay, and a fake email is circulating that servicemembers need to be aware of. (Hosted by****Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



STARCOM HQ 



Space Training and Readiness Command 



Aviation Bonus Program 



retention 



Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency 



phishing Related Links
        Department of the Air Force announces preferred locations for STARCOM HQ, 3 Deltas
            
            Air Force announces FY23 Legacy Aviation Bonus Program
            
            CYBER HYGIENE | Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency sends alert about phishing attempt
#### Samuel Doughty and Napoleon Burton v. E. H. & H. H. Hale.

(No. 915, Op. Book No. 2, p. 600.)

Appeal from Coryelle County.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., R J.

§1251. *Certiorari; requisites of petition for.*Where a petition for *certiorari*is based upon the ground that the court decided unjustly upon the merits, it should contain a statement of what are alleged to be *all*the facts that were in evidence on the trial. [Phillips v. Parr, 19 Tex. 91; Givens v. Blocker, 23 Tex. 634; Jones v. Nold, 22 Tex. 379.] The petition in this case alleged as follows: *722“Petitioners further represent that the following are the material facts proved on the trial of said cause in said justice’s court, to wit,” then proceeding to set out the facts proved, which, in the judgment of petitioners, were material. This was *held*to be insufficient. It should have set forth all the evidence, or at least all the material evidence, and should have so alleged. It must also appear in a petition for *certiorari*that the complainant has suffered wrong by the judgment rendered against him. The judgment of the county court dismissing the *certiorari*was

March 30, 1881.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5053]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   APPOINTMENT AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF VISITORS TO THE U.S. NAVAL 
                                ACADEMY

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, and pursuant to the 
provisions of section 6968(a) of title 10, United States Code, the 
Chair announces the Speaker's appointment as members of the Board of 
Visitors to the U.S. Naval Academy the following Members of the House: 
Mr. Skeen, of New Mexico; Mr. Gilchrest, of Maryland; Mr. Hoyer, of 
Maryland; and Mr. Mfume, of Maryland.
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 375 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 148
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 375

  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2013

  Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
   Durbin, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Merkley, Mr. 
Begich, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Leahy, Mr. King, Ms. Warren, 
Mr. Franken, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, 
  Mr. Cardin, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Graham, Mr. Reed, Mr. Baucus, Mrs. 
Shaheen, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Rockefeller, Ms. Klobuchar, 
 Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Warner, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Boxer, and 
 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

                             July 24, 2013

               Reported by Mr. Schumer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FILING BY SENATE CANDIDATES WITH COMMISSION.

    Section 302(g) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 432(g)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(g) Filing With the Commission.--All designations, 
        statements, and reports required to be filed under this Act 
        shall be filed with the Commission.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 148

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 375

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 24, 2013

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4957]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New York [Mr. Owens] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. OWENS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 442 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 442

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3001, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 201(1), strike ``$11,045,052,000'' and 
        insert ``$10,943,840,000''.
            (2) In section 202(a), strike ``$11,799,660'' and insert 
        ``$11,799,660,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 442

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to correct the enrollment of the 
                             bill S. 3001.
```
EX-35.2
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2011-C5

March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
EXHIBIT 13.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Thomas Degnan, the Chief Executive Officer of Reynolds Group Holdings Limited (the "Company"), certify that:





(a)    The annual report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)    The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ THOMAS DEGNANThomas DegnanChief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2015
EXHIBIT 33.2




MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE




Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:





Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)





Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).





Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the “Period”).





With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:




·
The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




·
The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.





CITIBANK, N.A.





By: /s/ Karen Montback


Its:  Managing Director





Dated: February 28, 2012
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6274-S6275]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           EXECUTIVE SESSION

                                 ______

                           EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

  Mrs. HUTCHISON. As in executive session, I ask unanimous consent that 
the Senate immediately proceed to the consideration of the following 
nominations on the Executive Calendar en bloc: calendar Nos. 107, 108, 
109, 110, 111, and 112; further, that the nominations be confirmed en 
bloc, the motions to reconsider be laid upon the table en bloc; that 
any statements relating to the nominations appear at the appropriate 
place in the Record, the President be immediately notified of the 
Senate's action, and that the Senate then return to legislative 
session.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The nominations considered and confirmed en bloc are as follows:

                             The Judiciary

       Maxine M. Chesney, of California, to be United States 
     District Judge for the Northern District of California.
       Eldon E. Fallon, of Louisiana, to be United States District 
     Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
       Curtis L. Collier, of Tennessee, to be United States 
     District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
       Joseph Robert Goodwin, of West Virginia, to be United 
     States District Judge for the Southern District of West 
     Virginia.
     [[Page S6275]]
     
                         Department of Justice

       Joe Bradley Pigott, of Mississippi, to be United States 
     Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi for the 
     term of four years.

                    United States Institute of Peace

       Harriet M. Zimmerman, of Florida, to be a Member of the 
     Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace 
     for a term expiring January 19, 1999.
     

                          ____________________
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WATEKA N. THOMASON, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Case No. 5D22-607 

LT Case Nos. 2017-300011-CFDB 

 2017-300025-CFDB

 2017-300027-CFDB 

 2017-300036-CFDB 

 2017-300050-CFDB 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 28, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County, 

Elizabeth A. Blackburn, Judge. 

Wateka N. Thomason, Ocala, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 4, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Kendall L. Combs and Patricia A. Combs, both of Hollister, 
Missouri; to retain control of Branson Bancshares, Inc., Branson, 
Missouri, and thereby indirectly retain control of Branson Bank, 
Branson, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Sepetmber 14, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-23229 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Peter Ballingall *versus*James Burnie.

Oct. Term, 1828.

Where a defendant, in an action of assault and battery, has been held to bail without affidavit, and without an order of a judge for that purpose, to an amount exceeding $500, the court upon application will order the bail to be reduced to that sum.

The defendant was arrested and held to bail in the sum of $10,000, in an action of assault and battery, without any order for that purpose, and without any affidavit on the part, of the plaintiff upon which such order could be granted.

*Mr. E. Wilkes,*on the part of the defendant,

nowmoved, that the bail-bond should be set aside and cancelled, or that the bail should be reduced to $500, the amount fixed by the rules of the court in ordinary arrests of the kind. He said, that in cases where there was no affidavit, or where the affidavit was defective, or not duly filed, or where the sum sworn to is not endorsed on the writ, the court would discharge the defendant on common bail. [ *Tidd’s Prac.*165.]

*Mr. Hugh Maxwell, contra*

insisted, that the affidavit to hold to bail might *now*be made, and all irregularities of proceeding cured by a subsequent compliance with the rules of the court. He proposed to file such an affidavit, and to show the court that this was a proper case for heavy bail, and for the exercise of its discretion. The ordinary sum of $500 would leave the plaintiff almost without a remedy, and if the irregularities of the first step could not be cured, serious injury would result to the plaintiff.

*Mr. Wilkes,*in reply,

contended, that the proceedings were oppressive in themselves, and a contempt of court. That the affidavit to hold to bail would now come too late, or at all events, would only justify the holding to bail in the ordinary sum of $500, *[Bunting v. Brown,*13 *John. R.*425.]

*238The Court,

on a subsequent day, ordered the bail to be reduced to *$500,*and that the bail should be discharged as to the excess beyond that sum.

[H. and E. Wilkes, *Att'ys for the deft.*W. P. Hawes, *Att'y for the plff.]*
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 25, 2016 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00977-CV 

LORI SCHMIDT AND JOSEPH HUEY, Appellants 

V. 

PARK ROYAL HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AND PARK ROYAL 

CONDOMINIUMS, INC. DBA PARK ROYAL HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, 

Appellees 

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-07881 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

By letter dated September 27, 2016, we notified appellants the Court received notice 

from the Dallas County District Clerk that appellants did not pay for or make arrangements to 

pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellants to file written verification of payment or 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification that appellants have been found 

to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellants that failure to do so 

would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, we have not received 

the requested verification or communication from appellants, and the clerk’s record has not been 

filed. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

160977F.P05 

 

/CarolynWright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

LORI SCHMIDT AND JOSEPH HUEY, 

Appellants 

No. 05-16-00977-CV V. 

PARK ROYAL HOMEOWNER'S 

ASSOCIATION AND PARK ROYAL 

CONDOMINIUMS, INC. DBA PARK 

ROYAL HOMEOWNER'S 

ASSOCIATION, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-07881. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellees Park Royal Homeowner’s Association and Park Royal 

Condominiums, Inc. dba Park Royal Homeowner’s Association recover their costs, if any, of this 

appeal from appellants Lori Schmidt and Joseph Huey. 

Judgment entered this 25th day of October, 2016.