alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IVAX
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          15,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,246<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    314,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               708,199
<PP&E>                                         406,740<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,357,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,292
<BONDS>                                        415,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,147
<OTHER-SE>                                     659,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,357,167
<SALES>                                        222,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,720
<CGS>                                          191,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (218,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (40,553)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (178,669)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (178,669)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.47)
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT SHOWN IS NET OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AMOUNT SHOWN IS NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[No. 42838-1-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. R.J.L., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-8-00011-2, Anita L. Farris, J., entered May 11, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group; Subcommittee F—Manpower & Training.                    

*Date:*                         September 21-22, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lynn M. Amende, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 8105, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-4759,                         *amendel@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 10, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23144 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 200 Harry S. Truman Pkwy, Suite 300 OF MARYLAND Annapolis, MD 21401

Petitioner V. Jennifer Vetter Landeo Misc. Docket AG No.94 September Term, 2015 Respondent ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent admits she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 1.9tbday of May ,2036, ORDERED, that Respondent, Jennifer Vetter Landeo, be and she is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Jennifer Vetter Landeo from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule I 6-772(d). 

## /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 476 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 476

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK 
              COMMISSION.

    The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission 
(referred to in this Act as the ``Commission'') is authorized in 
accordance with the provisions of section 6 of the Chesapeake and Ohio 
Canal Development Act (16 U.S.C. 410y-4), except that the Commission 
shall terminate 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate July 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 476

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Annual Report of NuZee, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2019 (the "Report"), the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Masateru Higashida, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report, as amended by the Amendment, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report, as amended by the Amendment, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 300 

To prohibit the implementation of any program that grants temporary legal 

status to, or adjusts the status of, any individual who is unlawfully 

present in the United States until the Secretary of Homeland Security 

certifies that the US–VISIT system has been fully implemented at every 

land, sea, and air port of entry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the implementation of any program that grants 

temporary legal status to, or adjusts the status of, any 

individual who is unlawfully present in the United States 

until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that 

the US–VISIT system has been fully implemented at 

every land, sea, and air port of entry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. US–VISIT SYSTEM. 

4 Any program that authorizes granting temporary 

5 legal status to individuals who are unlawfully present in 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 300 IS

1 the United States or adjusting the status of such individ2 uals to that of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent resi3 dence may not be implemented until the Secretary of 

4 Homeland Security certifies in writing to the President 

5 and Congress that the integrated entry and exit data sys6 tem required under section 110 of the Illegal Immigration 

7 Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 

8 U.S.C. 1365a), which was required to be implemented by 

9 December 21, 2005, has been fully implemented and is 

10 functioning at every land, sea, and air port of entry. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 US B-52s bring region together through Middle East presence patrolPublished April 2, 2022
                        
                        
                        Ninth Air Force (Air Forces Central) Public Affairs
                **SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFNS)  --**
                Coalition and regional partner air forces joined a U.S. Air Force**B-52 Stratofortress**and two**F-22 Raptors**on a presence patrol mission across the**U.S. Central Command**area of responsibility March 29.

The bomber’s flight originated atRAF Fairford, United Kingdom, and flew over the East Mediterranean, Arabian Peninsula, and Red Sea before departing the region.

“With each bomber task force mission, (**U.S. Air Forces Central**)and partner air forces demonstrate the strength of regional airpower,” said **Lt. Gen. Greg Guillot**, Ninth Air Force (AFCENT) commander. “An unprecedented nine countries flew with our B-52 today, so this mission clearly signaled our ability to quickly bring forces to the theater and operate seamlessly with our partners during a training event that signals our combined commitment to regional stability and defense.”

The non-stop B-52 mission included fighter escorts from the Royal Air Force and regional partner nations, enhancing regional stability and security through a show of combined strength and capability.

The flow of airpower throughout theater during this presence patrol was significant due to the addition of F-22s, which entered the USCENTCOM area of responsibility in February.

The B-52 and its aircrew are assigned to 5th Bomb Wing,**Minot Air Force Base**, North Dakota and flew the mission under**Air Force Global Strike Command**’s bomber task force mission-set.

USCENTCOM, through Ninth Air Force (AFCENT), has facilitated two bomber task force missions in 2022 as a demonstration of the U.S.-led coalition’s commitment to promoting regional stability. The last bomber-led mission across the Central Region involved one B-52 and occurred Feb. 14.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFCENT 



U.S. Central Command 



air forces central 



B-52 



Stratofortress 



Middle East 



ninth air force 



F-22 



Raptor 



RAF Fairford 



minot air force base 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



AFGSC
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BENGA AKANNI OYENIRAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50357

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00844-JAK-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Benga Akanni Oyeniran appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to

commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

DEC 2 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Oyeniran contends that his guilty plea is invalid because it was not knowing

and voluntary. We review de novo whether a plea was voluntary, and we treat the

question of whether a plea was knowing as a factual matter to be reviewed for clear

error. United States v. Sharp, 941 F.2d 811, 815-16 (9th Cir. 1991), superseded by

statute on other grounds, 18 U.S.C. § 3663. In both the signed plea agreement and

at the plea colloquy, Oyeniran certified that he understood his plea, had carefully

and thoroughly discussed it with his counsel, and had voluntarily agreed to its

terms. Those certifications “carry a strong presumption of truth,” Muth v.

Fondren, 676 F.3d 815, 821 (9th Cir. 2012), and Oyeniran’s claim that this

presumption is overcome here because he did not understand the nature of the

conspiracy charge is belied by the record.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-50357
Exhibit 21.1  Wellness Center USA, Inc. List of Subsidiaries  Name of Subsidiary or Consolidated EntityPlace of Formation/Incorporation (Jurisdiction)Date of Incorporation
(Date of Acquisition, if Applicable)Attributable InterestPsoria-Shield Inc.The State of FloridaJune 17, 2012
(August 24, 2012)100%National Pain Centers, Inc.The State of Nevada FloridaJanuary 24, 2014
(February 28, 2014)100%Stealthco, Inc.The State of IllinoisMarch 18, 2014
(April 4, 2014)100%Psoria Shield Development, LLCThe State of IllinoisJanuary 12, 201550%
[No. 24379-2-II.

Division Two.

May 5, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Marlin L. Ayers, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 98-1-04440-5, Grant L. Anderson, J., entered February 10, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      2,573,600
<SECURITIES>                                1,093,900         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 500,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,167,900 
<PP&E>                                     48,556,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             16,493,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             36,399,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,790,600
<BONDS>                                    34,505,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (903,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               36,399,500
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,485,500
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,181,400 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              122,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,358,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                85,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            85,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   85,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 5, 2017

t0928 

# Order

Clerk October 5, 2017

155116

TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT and TAYLOR

FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFT LOCAL

1085,

Respondents

- Appellants,

v SC: 155116

COA: 326128

MERC: 13

- 000133, 13

- 000029

NANCY RHATIGAN, REBECCA METZ, and

ANGELA STEFFKE,

Charging Parties

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Febru ary 9, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

B ERNSTEIN

, J., would grant leave to appeal.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the "Servicer"). 

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing com p liance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229 .1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations ( the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2( ii ), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6275]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           COMMONSENSE PRODUCT LIABILITY AND LEGAL REFORM ACT

  The Senate continued with the consideration of the bill.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The pending business is H.R. 956.

                          ____________________
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1448. NATHANIEL HARPER, JR. v. THE STATE.

Nathaniel Harper, Jr. was convicted of felony drug offenses in 1993. In

January 2017, Harper filed a pro se motion to set aside his convictions, contesting the

sufficiency of the underlying indictment. The trial court denied the motion, and

Harper filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, Harper’s motion essentially challenged his judgment of conviction. See

Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 494 (2) (659 SE2d 875) (2008) (challenge to

validity of indictment is challenge to conviction). See generally Rubiani v. State, 279

Ga. 299, n.1 (612 SE2d 798) (2005) (the substance of a motion, rather than its

nomenclature, controls). A petition or motion to vacate or modify a conviction is not

one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a

criminal case. See Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper v.

State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). An appeal from an order denying

or dismissing such a petition or motion must be dismissed. See Williams v. State, 287

Ga. 192, 194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010); Roberts, supra; Harper, supra at 218 (2).

Second, Harper’s appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within

30 days after entry of the appealable order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and

timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on

this Court. Jaheni v. State, 281 Ga. App. 213, 214 (635 SE2d 821) (2006). Here, the

trial court’s order was entered on January 12, 2017, but Harper did not file his notice

of appeal until 35 days later, on February 16, 2017.

May 10, 2017
For the foregoing reasons, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/10/2017