UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q

                   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999


      For Quarter Ended                             Commission File Number
       June 30, 1999                                      0-15532


                        MLH INCOME REALTY PARTNERSHIP VI
       (Exact name of registrant as specified in its governing instrument)


                 New York                              13-3272339
          (State of Organization)          (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

                       World Financial Center, South Tower
                225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10080-6112
               (Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

     Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (800) 288-3694.

     Indicate  by check mark  whether the  registrant  (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X   No __.



<PAGE>





                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Item 1.  Financial Statements:


Consolidated Balance Sheets
  June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998.

Consolidated Statements of Operations
 for the three and six months Ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 for the six months Ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
         and Results of Operations


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                         MLH INCOME REALTY PARTNERSHIP VI
                                                          AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
                                                            CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                                                              (Dollars in Thousands)



                                                                                       (Unaudited)
                                                                                          June 30,              December 31,
                                                                                           1999                    1998
                                                                                       ------------            -------------
       <S>                                                                             <C>                     <C>

       ASSETS:
       REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS HELD FOR SALE (Note 1):
       Land                                                                            $     26,716            $      26,716
       Other real estate assets                                                               9,068                    8,617
                                                                                       ------------            -------------
                Total real estate investments                                                35,784                   35,333
                                                                                       ------------            -------------

       OTHER ASSETS:
       Cash and equivalents (Note 1)                                                          4,321                    4,749
       Interest and other receivables, net                                                       75                      122
       Prepaid expenses and other                                                                15                        4
                                                                                       ------------            -------------
                Total other assets                                                            4,411                    4,875
                                                                                       ------------            -------------

                TOTAL                                                                  $     40,195            $      40,208
                                                                                       ============            =============

       LIABILITIES:
       Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                           $        237            $         161
       Other liabilities                                                                        514                      514
                                                                                       ------------            -------------
                Total liabilities                                                               751                      675
                                                                                       ------------            -------------

       PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
       General Partners:
         Capital contributions                                                                   25                       25
         Cumulative income                                                                   20,405                   20,405
         Cumulative distributions                                                           (20,430)                 (20,430)
                                                                                      -------------            -------------
                                                                                                  -                        -
                                                                                      -------------            -------------
       Limited Partners (322,275 Units):
         Capital contributions, net of offering expenses                                    294,968                  294,968
         Cumulative income                                                                  103,757                  103,846
         Cumulative distributions                                                          (359,281)                (359,281)
                                                                                      -------------           --------------
                                                                                             39,444                   39,533
                                                                                      -------------           --------------
                Total Partners' capital                                                      39,444                   39,533
                                                                                      -------------           --------------

                TOTAL                                                                 $      40,195           $       40,208
                                                                                      =============           ==============

</TABLE>

                See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                   MLH INCOME REALTY PARTNERSHIP VI
                                                   AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
                                                CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                             (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Unit Data)
                                                              (Unaudited)


                                                                  For the Three Months Ended            For the Six Months Ended
                                                                 -----------------------------      -------------------------------
                                                                   June 30,          June 30,         June 30,            June 30,
                                                                    1999              1998              1999                1998
                                                                 ------------      -----------      -----------         -----------
<S>                                                              <C>               <C>              <C>                 <C>

OPERATING REVENUES:
Rental and management fees                                       $        174      $       110      $       351         $       159
Interest                                                                   50               78              107                 161
                                                                 ------------      -----------      -----------         -----------
             Total operating revenues                                     224              188              458                 320
                                                                 ------------      -----------      -----------         -----------

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Property operating                                                        188              359              388                 639
General and administrative                                                 90               67              159                 135
                                                                 ------------      -----------      -----------         -----------
             Total operating expenses                                     278              426              547                 774
                                                                 ------------      -----------      -----------         -----------

NET LOSS                                                         $         54      $       238      $        89         $       454
                                                                 ============      ===========      ===========         ===========

NET LOSS ALLOCATED TO
  GENERAL PARTNERS                                               $          -      $         -      $         -         $         -
                                                                 ============      ===========      ===========         ===========

NET LOSS ALLOCATED TO
  LIMITED PARTNERS                                               $         54      $       238      $        89         $       454
                                                                 ============      ===========      ===========         ===========

NET LOSS PER UNIT OF LIMITED
  PARTNERSHIP INTEREST                                           $       0.17      $      0.74      $      0.28         $      1.41
                                                                 ============      ===========      ===========         ===========

UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST                                 322,275          322,275          322,275             322,275
                                                                 ============      ===========      ===========         ===========

</TABLE>

                 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               MLH INCOME REALTY PARTNERSHIP VI
                                                AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
                                             CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                                    (Dollars in Thousands)
                                                           (Unaudited)

                                                                                         For the Six Months Ended
                                                                                 -----------------------------------------
                                                                                    June 30,                   June 30,
                                                                                     1999                       1998
                                                                                 -------------             ---------------
    <S>                                                                          <C>                       <C>
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
        Net loss                                                                 $         (89)            $          (454)
        Items reconciling net loss to net cash
          used in operating activities:
              Bad debt expense                                                               -                         (15)
              Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                 Interest and other receivables                                             47                         (57)
                 Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                      76                         (37)
                 Other assets and other liabilities, net                                   (11)                         (8)
                                                                                 -------------             ---------------
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities                                     23                        (571)
                                                                                 -------------             ---------------

    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
        Property improvements                                                             (451)                       (791)
                                                                                 -------------             ---------------
    Net cash used in investing activities                                                 (451)                       (791)
                                                                                 -------------             ---------------


    NET DECREASE IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS                                                  (428)                     (1,362)

    CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD                                            4,749                       6,434
                                                                                 -------------             ---------------

    CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD                                          $       4,321             $         5,072
                                                                                 =============             ===============

</TABLE>
                 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


<PAGE>
                        MLH INCOME REALTY PARTNERSHIP VI
                         AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

1.   ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     MLH Income Realty  Partnership VI (the  "Partnership") was formed under the
New York Uniform  Limited  Partnership  Act on December 4, 1984. The Partnership
made  equity  investments  in  nineteen   income-producing   properties  located
throughout the United States.

     The  Partnership's  remaining  real estate  investment is the land formerly
known as  Treasure  Island  (the  "property"),  a  scenic,  oceanfront  property
situated on approximately 27 acres,  including 3,000 feet of coastline along the
Pacific Ocean, in Laguna Beach, California. As previously reported, the property
was  officially  closed as a mobile  home park on March 15,  1996 and all former
tenants have vacated the property. Also as previously reported,  Treasure Island
Associates   ("TIA"),   the  joint  venture   between  the  Partnership  and  an
unaffiliated  entity  through  which the  Partnership  owns an  interest  in the
property,  was  involved in lawsuits  concerning  certain  tenants.  See Note 2,
Litigation, for a discussion of local legislation,  administrative  requirements
and litigation affecting this property.

Future Developments of the Property

     As  previously  reported,  TIA has entered into a contract and an amendment
thereto  ("Contract") with  Vestar-Athens  Resorts,  L.L.C., a Phoenix,  Arizona
based real estate  developer  ("Athens"),  for the sale of the property.  Athens
plans to purchase the property and develop it as an oceanfront resort community.

     A Second Amendment to the Contract, dated as of July 27, 1999, provides for
(i) an additional down payment of $800,000 in the form of a promissory note that
must be replaced with cash in that amount by no later than August 10, 1999,  and
(ii) the  closing  date to be extended  from July 27,  1999 to August 31,  1999.
Athens  satisfied the terms of the promissory  note by depositing the additional
down payment with the escrow agent.

     The purchase price under the Contract,  as amended, is $37,000,000 and will
be  increased by an amount equal to an  annualized  10% of this stated  purchase
price  beginning June 1, 1999 until the closing date.  There can be no assurance
that a sale will be consummated.

     The Partnership  wishes to ensure that  statements made regarding  expected
future  developments  regarding  the  property  are  accompanied  by  meaningful
cautionary  statements  pursuant to the safe harbor  established  in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These  forward-looking  statements are
based upon current  available  data and reflect the  Partnership's  expectations
that the property will be sold to Athens in accordance  with the terms set forth
in the  Contract,  as  amended.  There can be no  assurance  that a sale will be
consummated.  Actual  closing  of the  sale is  subject  to  future  events  and
uncertainties,  which could materially  affect the ability of the Partnership to
consummate the sale to Athens.

     Since this is the last property investment of the Partnership,  pursuant to
Section 8.1 (ii) of the Partnership's  Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership,  the  sale of this  property  will  cause  the  dissolution  of the
Partnership. The Partnership will not be liquidated, however, until payment of a
final   liquidating   distribution   to  the   Partnership's   partners  of  the
Partnership's remaining assets.

     The following is a summary of significant  accounting  policies followed by
the Partnership in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

Basis of Presentation

     The financial  statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion
of management,  necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and
results of operations  for the periods  presented.  Such  adjustments  were of a
normal, recurring nature. Footnote disclosure which substantially duplicates the
disclosure  contained in the  Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1998,  which is hereby  incorporated  by reference,  has
been omitted.

Cash Equivalents

     The Partnership  classifies its investments in debt  securities,  including
those  considered to be cash  equivalents,  as securities  held-to-maturity  and
carries them at amortized cost on the accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet.
The purchase cost of such securities is included in "cash and equivalents".  All
such  securities  mature within one year, and any unrealized  gains or losses on
these securities for the six months ended June 30, 1999 are immaterial.

Income Taxes

     No provision for income taxes has been made since all income and losses are
allocated to the partners for inclusion in their tax returns.
<PAGE>
     Allocations Among Partners

     Pursuant to the Partnership  Agreement,  Distributable Cash from operations
if any,  will be  allocated  90.16%  to the  Limited  Partners  and 9.84% to the
Managing  General  Partners.  In  addition  to the  distribution  of  cash  from
operations,  the Partnership  Agreement provides for the General Partners,  as a
class,  to  receive  2%  of  Sale  or  Financing  Proceeds  to  be  distributed,
representing their residual carried interest.

     Net income or loss is  allocated  to the  Partners in  accordance  with the
Partnership Agreeement.

     Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement,  the General Partner will not
retain  any of the sale  proceeds  resulting  from the  anticipated  sale of the
property to Athens under the pending contract between Athens and TIA.

2.   LITIGATION

TREASURE ISLAND ASSOCIATES LITIGATION

     The Partnership owns a joint venture  Partnership  interest in the property
formerly  known as  Treasure  Island (the  "property"),  which was a mobile home
community  located in Laguna  Beach,  California.  The property was purchased by
Treasure Island  Associates  ("TIA"),  a joint venture  Partnership  between the
Partnership and an unaffiliated entity, on August 1, 1989.

     In 1992, in compliance with an ordinance  requiring mobile home park owners
to apply for a  conditional  use permit  ("CUP")  prior to a park  closure,  TIA
applied to the City of Laguna  Beach (the  "City") for a CUP. In 1994,  the City
adopted a  resolution  that  approved the CUP but imposed  conditions  on TIA to
mitigate  the  alleged  adverse  impact of the  closure on  tenants.  Litigation
between TIA, the City,  various tenants and former tenants of the property,  and
the  tenant  association   Treasure  Island  Residents  and  Owners  Association
("TIROA")  ensued  concerning  the  mitigation  conditions  imposed by the City,
possession of the property and related  damages.  This  litigation  was resolved
through  separate  settlements  among  the  parties.

     On May 2, 1996,  George Posey, a nonresident  tenant,  filed an action with
the Court against TIA for trespass, constructive eviction, breach of covenant of
quiet  enjoyment,   declaratory  relief,  and  unfair  business  practices.  TIA
successfully  demurred to the complaint and a first amended  complaint was filed
July 19, 1996, seeking to set aside  warehouseman's  lien sale,  cancellation of
instrument,  declaratory relief,  malicious prosecution,  constructive eviction,
breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment,  trespass, and unfair business practices.
Mr. Posey claims that TIA  wrongfully  sold his  mobilehome at a  warehouseman's
lien sale and thereafter  denied him entry to the  mobilehome.  He seeks special
damages  of  $50,000,  general  damages of  $250,000,  and  punitive  damages of
$500,000. A jury trial is set for October 25, 1999.

     In February 1996, the Partnership  submitted a development  proposal to the
City for the redevelopment of the property.  The initial application  included a
combination of detached  single-family  residences,  multi-family  housing and a
resort hotel complex  including  meeting rooms and restaurants.  The application
consisted of a local coastal program ("LCP") and a specific plan reflecting such
uses.  An LCP is required by  California  law because the City has not  obtained
approval from the California  Coastal Commission for a Local Coastal Program for
the property as required by the California Coastal Act.

     The Planning  Commission  approved a development  proposal for the property
consisting  of up to 275 hotel rooms and 37  residences  on April 15, 1998.  The
City Council approved the master plan (the "Plan") on June 2, 1998.  Because the
property  is on the  oceanfront,  the Plan was also  subject to  approval by the
Coastal  Commission.  On August  13,  1998 and  November  6, 1998,  the  Coastal
Commission approved the Plan subject to certain modifications and conditions. On
November 17, 1998, the City Council approved such  modifications and conditions.
The Executive Director of the Coastal Commission reported the acceptance of such
modifications and conditions to the Coastal  Commission and, as a result of such
report, the Plan became final on January 13, 1999.

     The Planning  Commission and City Council may now consider  further permits
and approvals to implement the Plan, such as a subdivision map, site development
plan and design review.

     On July 6, 1998,  Eugene R.  Atherton,  M.D.  filed a Petition  for Writ of
Mandate (the  "Petition")  in the Orange County  Superior Court against the City
Council Members and others (Atherton v. City of Laguna Beach, et al., Action No.
796478).  The Petition  challenged  the City's  compliance  with the  California
Environmental  Quality Act in its consideration of the Plan and sought a Writ of
Mandate  vacating the City Council's  approval of the Plan. TIA,  Merrill Lynch,
Hubbard Inc. (an affiliate of the Managing General Partner) and The Athens Group
(an  affiliate  of the party  that  executed  the  Contract  for the sale of the
property) are named in the Petition as real parties in interest.  The Court held
a hearing on the merits of the Petition on April 28,  1999,  and  announced  its
decision  upholding  the City  Council's  approval  of the  Plan.  Atherton  has
appealed the decision.
<PAGE>
Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
              and Results of Operations

     Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Because the land formerly known as Treasure Island ("the  property") is the
last remaining property  investment of the Partnership,  pursuant to Section 8.1
(ii) of the Partnership's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership,
the sale of this last property will cause the  dissolution  of the  Partnership.
The  Partnership  will not be  liquidated,  however,  until  payment  of a final
liquidating   distribution  to  the   Partnership's   partners  of  all  of  the
Partnership's  remaining assets. See Part II, Item 1, Legal  Proceedings,  for a
discussion of local  legislation,  administrative  requirements  and  litigation
affecting the potential disposition and value of this property.

     At June 30, 1999, the  Partnership and its  consolidated  joint venture had
cash and equivalents of approximately  $4.3 million.  Such funds are expected to
be utilized for reserve  requirements,  redevelopment  of the property,  working
capital  requirements  and, to the extent available,  cash  distributions to the
Partners.  In total, cash and equivalents  decreased  $428,000 from December 31,
1998 to June 30, 1999 primarily due to  disbursements  for certain costs related
to the  redevelopment  of the  property,  net of interest  income  earned on the
Partnership's portfolio of cash equivalents.

     Cash flows are  affected  by  disbursements  for the  redevelopment  of the
property.

     Cumulative  Limited Partners'  distributions paid through November 30, 1996
have been  allocated  to the Limited  Partners  based upon the dates they became
Unit Holders and are  summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                    <C>                <C>                 <C>                   <C>
                                                                                        Percentage
                                                                                         Return of
                                                                  Cumulative             Original
   Date Became                              Cumulative           Distributions            Capital
   Unit Holder             Units           Distributions          Per Unit             Contribution
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 6, 1986               204,786        $229,684,000            $1,121.58                  112%
August 7, 1986              64,730          72,050,000             1,113.08                  111%
November 25, 1986           25,200          27,670,000             1,098.01                  110%
January 20, 1987             7,477           8,153,000             1,090.41                  109%
March 11, 1987              15,500          16,795,000             1,083.56                  108%
April 23, 1987                 253             272,000             1,075.10                  108%
May 7, 1987                  4,329           4,657,000             1,075.75                  108%

</TABLE>

     Such cumulative Limited Partners' distributions included sales proceeds and
related  interest  totalling  $211,670,000,  or $656.80 per Unit. For income tax
purposes all cash  distributions are a tax-free return of capital until the cash
received exceeds the tax basis of his/her Partnership investment. Taxable income
or losses of the Partnership are passed through to the Partners for inclusion in
their  respective  tax  returns,  as  reflected  on the  Federal  Schedules  K-1
distributed to the Partners each year.

     Considering  reserve   requirements  for  the  costs  associated  with  the
redevelopment  and  eventual  sale  of  the  property,  the  Partnership's  last
property,  the Partnership does not expect to make future cash  distributions to
Limited  Partners until the sale of this last property.  Distributions of future
sales  proceeds will be made in accordance  with the  Partnership's  Amended and
Restated  Agreement  of Limited  Partnership.  Buyers and  sellers of Units will
receive such  distributions  in accordance  with the terms of the  Partnership's
transfer documents. The level and timing of distributions of sales proceeds will
be dependent on the timing of the future sale of the remaining  property and the
ultimate sale price achieved, as well as on reserve requirements.

     Results of Operations

     Fluctuations  in the  Partnership's  operating  results  for the six months
ended June 30,  1999,  as compared to the six months  ended June 30,  1998,  are
primarily  attributable to a decrease in total operating expenses as a result of
declined activities at the Partnership's last remaining property.
<PAGE>
Year 2000 Compliance Initiative

     The year 2000  ("Y2K")  problem is the result of a  widespread  programming
technique that causes computer  systems to identify a date based on the last two
numbers of a year,  with the  assumption  that the first two numbers of the year
are "19". As a result,  the year 2000 would be stored as "00", causing computers
to incorrectly interpret the year as 1900. Left uncorrected, the Y2K problem may
cause   information   technology   systems   (e.g.,   computer   databases)  and
non-information  technology systems (e.g.,  elevators) to produce incorrect data
or cease operating completely.

     The Managing  General Partner is responsible  for providing  administrative
and  accounting  services  necessary  to support the  Partnership's  operations,
including  maintenance  of the books and  records,  maintenance  of the  partner
database,  issuance of  financial  reports and tax  information  to partners and
processing distribution payments to partners. In 1995, Merrill Lynch established
the Year  2000  Compliance  Initiative,  which is an  enterprisewide  effort  to
address the risks  associated with the Y2K problem,  both internal and external.
The  Partnership  utilizes  systems  provided by Merrill Lynch and these systems
have completed Y2K renovation and testing. Merrill Lynch continues to survey and
communicate  with third  parties  whose Year 2000  readiness is important to the
company.  Based on the nature of the response and the  importance of the product
or service involved,  Merrill Lynch determines if additional  testing is needed.
Merrill Lynch is also refining its contingency plans and expects to complete the
testing of these plans at the end of the third quarter of 1999.

     Although the  Partnership  has not finally  determined the cost  associated
with its Year 2000 readiness  efforts,  the Partnership  does not anticipate the
cost of the Y2K problem to be material to its business,  financial  condition or
results of operations in any given year. However, there can be no guarantee that
the systems of other companies on which the  Partnership's  systems rely will be
timely  converted,  or  that a  failure  to  convert  by  another  company  or a
conversion that is incompatible with the Partnership's  systems would not have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's  business,  financial  condition or
results of operations.



<PAGE>
                                    PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

TREASURE ISLAND ASSOCIATES LITIGATION

     The Partnership owns a joint venture  Partnership  interest in the property
formerly  known as  Treasure  Island (the  "property"),  which was a mobile home
community  located in Laguna  Beach,  California.  The property was purchased by
Treasure Island  Associates  ("TIA"),  a joint venture  Partnership  between the
Partnership and an unaffiliated entity, on August 1, 1989.

     In 1992, in compliance with an ordinance  requiring mobile home park owners
to apply for a  conditional  use permit  ("CUP")  prior to a park  closure,  TIA
applied to the City of Laguna  Beach (the  "City") for a CUP. In 1994,  the City
adopted a  resolution  that  approved the CUP but imposed  conditions  on TIA to
mitigate  the  alleged  adverse  impact of the  closure on  tenants.  Litigation
between TIA, the City,  various tenants and former tenants of the property,  and
the tenant association  Treasure Island Residents and Owners Association (TIROA)
ensued concerning the mitigation  conditions imposed by the City,  possession of
the property and related damages.  This litigation was resolved through separate
settlements  among the parties.

     On May 2, 1996,  George Posey, a nonresident  tenant,  filed an action with
the Court against TIA for trespass, constructive eviction, breach of covenant of
quiet  enjoyment,   declaratory  relief,  and  unfair  business  practices.  TIA
successfully  demurred to the complaint and a first amended  complaint was filed
July 19, 1996, seeking to set aside  warehouseman's  lien sale,  cancellation of
instrument,  declaratory relief,  malicious prosecution,  constructive eviction,
breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment,  trespass, and unfair business practices.
Mr. Posey claims that TIA  wrongfully  sold his  mobilehome at a  warehouseman's
lien sale and thereafter  denied him entry to the  mobilehome.  He seeks special
damages  of  $50,000,  general  damages of  $250,000,  and  punitive  damages of
$500,000. A trial is set for October 25, 1999.

     In February 1996, the Partnership  submitted a development  proposal to the
City for the redevelopment of the property.  The initial application  included a
combination of detached  single-family  residences,  multi-family  housing and a
resort hotel complex  including  meeting rooms and restaurants.  The application
consisted of a local coastal program ("LCP") and a specific plan reflecting such
uses.  An LCP is required by  California  law because the City has not  obtained
approval from the California  Coastal Commission for a Local Coastal Program for
the property as required by the California Coastal Act.

     The Planning  Commission  approved a development  proposal for the property
consisting  of up to 275 hotel rooms and 37  residences  on April 15, 1998.  The
City Council approved the master plan (the "Plan") on June 2, 1998.  Because the
property  is on the  oceanfront,  the Plan was also  subject to  approval by the
Coastal  Commission.  On August  13,  1998 and  November  6, 1998,  the  Coastal
Commission approved the Plan subject to certain modifications and conditions. On
November 17, 1998, the City Council approved such  modifications and conditions.
The Executive Director of the Coastal Commission reported the acceptance of such
Modifications and conditions to the Coastal  Commission and, as a result of such
report, the Plan became final on January 13, 1999.

     The Planning  Commission and City Council may now consider  further permits
and approvals to implement the Plan, such as a subdivision map, site development
plan and  design  review.

     On July 6, 1998,  Eugene R.  Atherton,  M.D.  filed a Petition  for Writ of
Mandate (the  "Petition")  in the Orange County  Superior Court against the City
Council Members and others (Atherton v. City of Laguna Beach, et al., Action No.
796478).  The Petition  challenged  the City's  compliance  with the  California
Environmental  Quality Act in its consideration of the Plan and sought a Writ of
Mandate  vacating the City Council's  approval of the Plan. TIA,  Merrill Lynch,
Hubbard Inc. (an affiliate of the Managing General Partner) and The Athens Group
(an  affiliate of the party that executed the June 2, 1998 contract for the sale
of the  property)  are named in the Petition as real  parties in  interest.  The
Court  held a hearing  on the  merits of the  Petition  on April 28,  1999,  and
announced  its  decision  upholding  the City  Council's  approval  of the Plan.
Atherton has appealed the decision.

     Items 2-5 are herewith  omitted as the response to all items is either none
or not applicable.


Item 6.      Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

Responses:

a) Exhibits: Exhibit 27 Financial Data Schedule
             For the period ending June 30, 1999.

b) Reports on Form 8-K:

     Report filed on April 30, 1999 disclosing  under Item 5, Other Events,  the
execution of an amendment to the contract of sale of the land formerly  known as
Treasure Island.



     Pursuant  to the  requirements  of  Section  13 or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the  Partnership  has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                        MLH INCOME REALTY PARTNERSHIP VI

                        By:      MLH Property Managers Inc.
                                 Managing General Partner



                        By:      /s/ Sharon McKenzie
                                 Sharon McKenzie
                                 Vice President and
                                 Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 1999