alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1014]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HOME FOR GUIDING HANDS

                                 ______

                           HON. DUNCAN HUNTER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 11, 1995
  Mr. HUNTER. Mr. Speaker, mentally and physically disabled people are 
being helped by computers in two homes for the disabled because of 
techniques developed by Lloyd Hartvigsen. He credits part of the 
success for the lab he established at the Home for Guiding Hands at 
Lakeside, CA, to Lorraine Barrack, now 36 years of age, who has had 
cerebral palsy since birth.
  ``It just made sense that people who can't speak might find their 
voice with the aid of a computer,'' said Mr. Hartvigsen, a retired 
printer who established a 10-terminal lab for residents of the Home for 
Guiding Hands. The mother of Lorraine Barrack, Mrs. Elaine Barrack, 
said ``It's the first time my daughter has been able to write us a note 
that says `I love you.' This was the first year she's been able to send 
out Christmas cards. You just can't know how precious these notes and 
letters are to me.''
  Mr. Hartvigsen, working with Lorraine's family, decided that the wand 
and touch screen would be perfect, since she had control of her head 
movements. ``With a touch screen, everything you do with a keyboard can 
be done just by touching the screen,'' he explained. ``To use the 
computer, Lorraine puts on a cap with a foot-long wand attached. By 
leaning forward and tapping the wand on certain parts of the computer 
screen, she can write a note or play a game.''
  Lorraine and 14 classmates at the Home for Guiding Hands use the 
computer system to do schoolwork, to paint and draw, and also to learn 
to type and send letters to relatives and friends. Mr. Hartvigsen is 
also employed part-time as a computer instructor at St. Madeleine 
Sophie's Center for the Handicapped in El Cajon, CA. He began volunteer 
work at the Home for Guiding Hands in 1988, but it was in the past 4 
years that he realized how helpful computers could be as communication 
tools for the developmentally handicapped. Originally a volunteer at 
the Home for Guiding Hands, he was hired several months ago by the Home 
to operate the computer lab that he had set up. He now instructs 
residents of the Home in the use of computers, as well as residents of 
the St. Madeleine Sophie's Center.
  Mr. Hartvigsen is the son of Austin Hartvigsen of Santee and the late 
Mrs. Austin Hartvigsen, both of whom were volunteers for several years 
at the naturalization ceremonies in San Diego. They welcomed the new 
citizens, answered any questions they might have, and helped them 
register to vote. The family is an outstanding example of the best in 
volunteerism in America.

                          ____________________
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2011-C3

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer’sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 49 

Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the Military Order of the Purple Heart 

and commending recipients of the Purple Heart for their courageous 

demonstrations of gallantry and heroism on behalf of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2007 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the Military Order of 

the Purple Heart and commending recipients of the Purple Heart for their courageous demonstrations of gallantry and heroism on behalf of the United States. 

Whereas the Purple Heart is a combat decoration awarded to 

members of the Armed Forces who are wounded by an 

instrument of war wielded by the enemy and posthumously to the next of kin in the name of members who 

are killed in action or die of wounds received in action; 

Whereas the Purple Heart was originally conceived as the 

Badge of Military Merit by General George Washington 

on August 7, 1782; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 49 IH 

Whereas 2007 marks the 225th anniversary of the Badge of 

Military Merit, the predecessor of the Purple Heart 

Medal; 

Whereas the practice of awarding the Purple Heart was revived in 1932, the 200th anniversary of George Washington’s birth, out of respect for his memory and military 

achievements; 

Whereas over 1.5 million Purple Heart Medals have been 

awarded to members of the Armed Forces fighting in defense of freedom and democracy in World War I, World 

War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Operation 

Desert Storm, Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation 

Iraqi Freedom, and other expeditionary conflicts; 

Whereas more than 500,000 recipients of the Purple Heart 

are still living today; 

Whereas the organization known as the Military Order of the 

Purple Heart was formed on October 19, 1932, for the 

protection and mutual interest of members of the Armed 

Forces who have received the Purple Heart; and 

Whereas the Military Order of the Purple Heart is composed 

exclusively of recipients of the Purple Heart and is the 

only veterans’ service organization comprised strictly of 

combat veterans: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) congratulates the Military Order of the Pur4 ple Heart on its 75th anniversary as a national or5 ganization whose goals are to preserve and sustain 

6 the honor of the Armed Forces; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 49 IH 

1 (2) commends all recipients of the Purple Heart 

2 for their courageous demonstrations of gallantry and 

3 heroism on behalf of the United States; and 

4 (3) encourages all Americans to take time to 

5 learn about the Purple Heart and the honor, cour6 age, and bravery it symbolizes. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<PAGE>

JPMorgan
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Global Trade Services

                                                 March 28, 2003
                                                 L/C NO.: D-233079
                                            AMENDMENT NO: 3


Advising Bank



       ********* DIRECT *********                      APPLICANT:

                                        AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL
                                        SERVICES, INC.
                                        111 PRESIDENTIAL BLVD., STE 215
                                        BALA CYNWYD, PA 19004


              Beneficiary



WANAMAKER, L.L.C.   C/O AMERIMAR
WANAMAKER MANAGEMENT CO.
210 W. RITTENHOUSE SQUARE, STE 1900
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103



IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED, THE ABOVE-REFERENCED LETTER OF CREDIT
HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

     1 - LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT IS INCREASED BY USD 2,000,000.00 (TWO MILLION
         AND 00/100 UNITED STATES DOLLARS).

     2 - THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOW AVAILABLE UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS USD
         8,000,000.00 (EIGHT MILLION AND 00/100 UNITED STATES DOLLARS).

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CREDIT REMAIN UNCHANGED.





                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Authorized Signature
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Digital Angel Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5,2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Kevin N. McGrath, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Periodic Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 4, 2005 | /s/ Kevin N. McGrath                  |   |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Kevin N. McGrath                      |
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                       | Digital Angel Corporation             |

 

----
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# C-5M Super Galaxy visits Eglin AFB for countermeasures testing

              - Published  May 29, 2021
              -                             By  Samuel King Jr.                                                    

**EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --  **
Engineers, testers and support staff working on the **Eglin Air Force Base** range enjoyed a fireworks display the last two weeks courtesy of the Air Force’s largest aircraft, the **C-5M Super Galaxy**.The 436th Airlift Wing’s 247-foot long, 65-foot tall giant and aircrew from **Dover AFB**, Delaware, visited the Florida panhandle for defensive countermeasures testing. Each night the aircraft flew into an area of the range and released more than 15 flares. This process was repeated several times from different range entry points and angles throughout the night.The goal of **Air Mobility Command** Test and Evaluation Squadron’s testing was to increase aircraft and crew combat survivability by evaluating and fielding improved defensive systems capabilities. Eglin AFB was the prime site for this testing due to its one-stop shopping location for this test type according to Jim Bonn, AMCTES test director.“AMC brings aircraft and crew and everything else is ready for us,” he said.For the 9th Airlift Squadron’s operational aircrew, the chance to participate in countermeasures testing and to release flares going 300 knots at 1,500 feet was a unique opportunity not to be missed.“There are rare situations when the aircraft does pop flares,” said Capt. Bryan Chanson, 9th AS pilot. “The crew is usually focused primarily on flying out or away from the potential threat and hoping flares do their intended jobs. The testing allowed us to gain the situational awareness to concentrate on flare dispense in a safe environment.”The 46th Test Squadron was responsible for the Eglin-based test planning, resource coordination and execution for the entirety of the Super Galaxy’s test. Flare testing requires support from many Eglin units and external organizations.“Countermeasure testing like this is a Team Eglin event,” said Capt. Daniel Clarke, 46th TS Defensive Systems Flight commander. “Our test engineers work hand in hand with the 96th Range Group to ensure resources are ready to test and collect data and the 96th Maintenance Group ensures every flare tested is loaded onto each aircraft.”The C-5 testing was just the start of a two-month test program. Through the end of June, the 96th Cyberspace Test Group will execute flare testing on four more aircraft from **Air Force Special Operations Command**,**Air National Guard**, **Air Force Reserve Command** Test Center and AMC.AMCTES test directors will provide AMC headquarters with a detailed analysis of results once they complete their assessment of the data gained from the Eglin AFB testing.

LRUSAFAFAir ForceAircraftAMCAir Mobility CommandC-5MSuper GalaxyEglin AFBCountermeasurestestingDover AFB
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FINANCING AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


   


    This Amendment No. 2 to Financing and Security Agreement (this “Amendment”) shall be entered into on October 15, 2014, by and between HIPCRICKET, INC. (“Client”), a Delaware corporation, and FAST PAY PARTNERS LLC (“FPP”), a Delaware limited liability company.







RECITALS


 


    WHEREAS, the Client and FPP entered into that certain Financing and Security Agreement (the “FPP Factoring Agreement”) dated on or around June 2, 2014, as amended from time to time;









    WHEREAS, the Client and FPP deem it desirable and necessary to supplement and modify certain terms and provisions to the FPP Factoring Agreement by this Amendment;









    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual representations, warranties and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:










    1.   All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have their respective meanings as set forth in the FPP Factoring Agreement. This Amendment and the terms and provisions hereof, are incorporated in their entirety into both the FPP Factoring Agreement by reference.  In the event of any conflict between this Amendment and the FPP Factoring Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail.




 


    2.   Amendment to the FPP Factoring Agreement.


 



       a.   Clause (b) in the General Rates and Fees box on the first page of the FPP Factoring Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such clause and replacing it with the following:









          “(b)            Advance Rate: Eighty Percent (80%) of gross value of Invoices.”


 


    3.   Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Amendment.


 


       a.   The FPP Factoring Agreement must be in effect, without termination;


 



      b.   No Default or Event of Default shall have occurred or be continuing under the FPP Factoring Agreement; and




 



       c. Client shall pay all of FPP's reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses in connection with this Amendment.










   4.   Sections 28, 29, and 30 of the FPP Factoring Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference mutatis mutandis.








  





  











  






 


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties here have executed this Amendment as of the day, month, and year first above written.




 



	CLIENT:	HIPCRICKET, INC. 
Signature: /s/Todd E. Wilson 


  


Todd E. Wilson


	 	 
	FPP:	FAST PAY PARTNERS LLC 
  


Signature: /s/Jed Simon 


  


Jed Simon
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# CBM+ redefines aircraft maintenance

              - Published  Dec. 12, 2020
              -                             By Daryl Mayer                                                    
              - Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs

**WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, Ohio (AFNS) --  **
About five years ago, the Air Force embarked on a journey with Condition Based Maintenance Plus, to shift the sustainment enterprise from “flying to failure” to a “flying to forecast” mindset.In a recent episode of **Air Force Life Cycle Management Center**’s Leadership Log podcast, Chris Damani, CBM+ Program Office chief, described CBM+ as a new sustainment paradigm that is transforming the way the Air Force sustains its fleet. The central element is leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to turn sustainment data into valuable knowledge that puts the Air Force in control of their sustainment and logistics operations.“Overall the future of CBM+, as I see it, is that CBM+ model or that CBM+ paradigm just being ingrained into the way we sustain our fleet and that it’s just not just another gimmick or buzzword, it’s just the way,” Damani said.Avoiding unscheduled downtime, being able to plan maintenance actions, forecast supply needs to avoid rush ordering parts, decreasing mission aborts and decreasing troubleshooting time are all benefits that ultimately lead to increasing fleet readiness, he said.The program showed results from the beginning, he said. Prototype projects from CBM+ in the 2018/2019 time frame showed sufficient progress to warrant the Rapid Sustainment Office’s board of directors to order CBM+ to scale.“Meaning that the technology had proven the benefit and we were approved to go implement the project across the Air Force,” Damani said. “Based on that decision in December 2019, less than a year ago, we were challenged to scale CBM+ to 12 weapons systems in Fiscal Year 2020.The successful results of that effort, he said, show CBM+ as a scalable, repeatable process that can be applied to different platforms across the Air Force.To hear the full conversation, watch the Leadership Log on YouTube at **https://youtu.be/W_Tl7svaYW8**. The podcast is also available by searching “Leadership Log” on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify, Overcast, Radio Public or Breaker.

 

FSUSAFAFAir ForceAFMCAir Force Materiel CommandAFLCMCAir Force Life Cycle Management CenterCBM+Condition Based Maintenance Plus
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         517,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,171,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                   106,991
<INVENTORY>                                 35,890,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,768,447
<PP&E>                                      43,428,778
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,798,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,664,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,465,123
<BONDS>                                      8,416,041
<COMMON>                                        75,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,048,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,664,163
<SALES>                                    106,834,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           106,834,049
<CGS>                                       85,276,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               85,276,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,621,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (48,169)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,578,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,405,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,358,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,047,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,047,792
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis 

DEBRA (WALKER) SCOTT 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2830-02-2 PER CURIAM 

 FEBRUARY 11, 2003 

TONY SCOTT 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF POWHATAN COUNTY 

Thomas V. Warren, Judge 

 (William Mills Krieger, on brief), for 

appellant. Appellant submitting on brief. 

 No brief for appellee. 

 Debra (Walker) Scott (wife) appeals the decision of the 

circuit court dismissing her bill of complaint seeking a divorce 

from Tony Scott (husband). On appeal, wife contends the trial 

court erred by finding husband, a prisoner, could not waive the 

appointment of a guardian ad litem. Wife asks that we reverse the 

trial court's order dismissing the case and remand for 

consideration upon the merits. Upon reviewing the record and 

opening brief, we agree with wife and reverse. 

Background

 Wife filed a bill of complaint seeking a divorce from husband 

on January 20, 2002. She asserted they had been separated for 

over one year. Husband was incarcerated at the time and submitted 

 

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not 

designated for publication.
to the court a waiver of right to guardian ad litem on February 4, 

2002, waiving his rights to be represented in the divorce and 

requesting the court not appoint a guardian ad litem. The trial 

court dismissed the action, holding that the appointment of a 

guardian ad litem cannot be waived. 

Analysis

 "Convicts are not civilly dead in Virginia, and . . . [are] 

not legally incompetent to transact business either before or 

after [a] conviction in the criminal case." Dunn v. Terry, 216 

Va. 234, 239, 217 S.E.2d 849, 854 (1975). "[T]he appointment of 

a [guardian ad litem is] a procedural provision which [can] be 

waived by a prisoner." Cross v. Sundin, 222 Va. 37, 38, 278 

S.E.2d 805, 806 (1981); see also Pigg v. Commonwealth, 17 

Va. App. 756, 760, 441 S.E.2d 216, 219 (1994) (en banc). 

 Husband permissibly waived his right to the appointment of 

a guardian ad litem, and the trial court erred by dismissing the 

action. Accordingly, we reverse and remand. 

Reversed and remanded.

- 2 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NORMAN EARL GREGORY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 97 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of December, 2019, the “Petition for Leave to File Nunc 

Pro Tunc Allowance of Appeal” is DENIED.
[No. 45139-1-I.

Division One.

May 15, 2000.]

#### Alvin M. Mycon, *Appellant,*v. Safeco National Insurance Company, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-13363-7, Robert S. Lasnik, J., entered September 11, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Becker, A.C.J.; Coleman, J., dissenting.