alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### YATES *v.*YATES.

Appeal and Error; Motion to Dismiss.

1. Where the appellee moves to dismiss an appeal because of the omission of some of the proceedings below from the transcript of the record On appeal, and it appears from the transcript that the appellant in the court below, in designating the parts of the record below to be incorporated in the transcript, directed that the parts in question be omitted therefrom, and the appellee failed to object to such omission or himself make any designation, it is probable that a suggestion of diminution of the record made in this court would be made too late; but in any event such a suggestion would have to be supported by affidavit accounting for the appellee’s failure to demand a complete record. Under such circumstances, therefore, the motion will be denied.

2. The fact that a defective record has been brought up is ordinarily not ground for dismissing an appeal.

No. 2227.

Submitted December 9, 1910.

Decided December 9, 1910.

Hearing on a motion to dismiss an appeal.

*Denied.*

The appellee, Rebecca Tates, moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript of record did not contain all of the evidence which was submitted to the court below, and considered by it in passing the decree appealed from, — six depositions for the plaintiff and eight depositions for the defendant having been omitted from the transcript. The motion was supported by affidavit of counsel for the appellee, which was to the effect that he had examined the transcript of the record in the court below, and found that the depositions mentioned had been omitted from the transcript.

*133
      *Mr. John Ridoui*and *Mr. Thomas O. Taylor*for tbe motion.

*Messrs. Leckie,*Fulton, *& Oox*opposed.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of thp Court:

It appearing from the record that there was a designation of the parts of the record below to be included in the tram script, directing the omissions referred to in this motion, aud no objection thereto, or further designation by the other side, it is probable that a suggestion of diminution of the record would now be too late. At any rate, it would require an affidavit accounting for failure to demand a complete record. The fact that a defective record has been brought up is ordinarily no ground for dismissing the appeal. The motion to dismiss is *denied.*
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2921 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home 

Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lane A. Evans 

VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANE A. EVANS VA COMMUNITY BASED OUT4 PATIENT CLINIC. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community based outpatient 

6 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 

7 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, shall be 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2921 IS

1 known and designated as the ‘‘Lane A. Evans VA Commu2 nity Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

4 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the community based outpatient clinic referred 

6 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

7 the ‘‘Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient 

8 Clinic’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3013 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3013

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prevent manipulation of physical 
              commodities prices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2014

 Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prevent manipulation of physical 
              commodities prices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Insider Trading in 
Commodities Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING MANIPULATION AND USE OF NONPUBLIC 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--In section 6(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 
U.S.C. 9), strike paragraph (3) and insert the following:
            ``(3) Other manipulation.--In addition to the prohibition 
        under paragraph (1), it shall be unlawful--
                    ``(A) for any person, directly or indirectly, to 
                manipulate or attempt to manipulate the price of any 
                swap, or of any commodity in interstate commerce, or of 
                any contract for future delivery on or subject to the 
                rules of any registered entity; and
                    ``(B) for any large financial institution, directly 
                or indirectly, to purchase or sell any swap, or any 
                commodity in interstate commerce, or any contract for 
                future delivery of any commodity, while in possession 
                of material, nonpublic information related to the 
                storage, shipment, or use of the commodity arising from 
                the ownership or interest of the person in a business 
                or facility used to store, ship, or use the 
                commodity.''.
    (b) Effectiveness.--The amendment made by subsection (a)--
            (1) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act; and
            (2) is not conditioned on the adoption of any rule or 
        regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6225]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   APPOINTMENT BY THE VICE PRESIDENT

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Chair, on behalf of the Vice President, 
pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 276d-276g, as amended, appoints the following 
Senators as Members of the Senate Delegation to the Canada-United 
States Interparliamentary Group during the first session of the 104th 
Congress, to be held in Huntsville, ON, Canada, May 18-22, 1995:
  The Senator from Iowa [Mr. Grassley], and the Senator from Texas 
[Mrs. Hutchison].

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E970]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       TRIBUTE TO FORMER-SPEAKER FLORENCIO (LARRY) TORRES RAMIREZ

                                 ______

                        HON. ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD

                                of guam

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. UNDERWOOD. Mr. Speaker, the island of Guam lost one of its 
premier citizens and public servants on April 12 of this year. The Hon. 
Florencio Torres Ramirez, a former speaker of the Guam Legislature, was 
called to his eternal rest at the age of 79.
  The passing of former-Speaker Ramirez marks the end of an era. 
Considered nothing short of legendary by Guam's politicians, Larry 
Ramirez dedicated more than 63 years in public service. His government 
service dated back to 1931 when, during his teenage years, he worked 
for the Naval Governor of Guam.
  Long considered as one of Guam's most popular lawmakers, Larry went 
on to hold public office longer than any other elected official in the 
island's history. He first got into politics in 1949 when he was 
elected as councilman from the village of Yigo. He later went on to 
serve as a senator in the first 12 Guam Legislatures. After having been 
elected as Speaker in 1971, he chose to retire after the 12th Guam 
Legislature.
  Having been one of Guam's premier political pioneers, he is 
considered by many of today's leaders as a fitting role model and a 
major influence. He is remembered as a man of integrity. Despite 
countless years of political involvement, not once did he compromise 
his principles. Never pretentious, he did not let his political 
successes take the better of him. Amid all the changes that he had been 
forced to live through, he remained a true islander and an exceptional 
leader.
  The late Hon. Florencio Torres Ramirez left a legacy of service and 
devotion to the island of Guam, to its people and to the United States 
as a whole. His distinguished career served as an inspiration to many 
of us who serve as elected officials of today. His passing is a great 
loss and his presence will surely be missed. On behalf of the people of 
Guam, I offer my condolences and join his bereaved children, and 
grandchildren in mourning the loss of a father, and a fellow servant to 
the people of Guam.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2846 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2846

 To express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State should 
  use his existing authority to revoke the passports of United States 
citizens who have provided material support to ISIS and to require the 
 Secretary to submit a quarterly report to Congress on the use of such 
                               authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 17 (legislative day, September 16), 2014

  Ms. Ayotte introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State should 
  use his existing authority to revoke the passports of United States 
citizens who have provided material support to ISIS and to require the 
 Secretary to submit a quarterly report to Congress on the use of such 
                               authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State--
            (1) is authorized to revoke the passport of any United 
        States citizen whose activities abroad are likely to cause 
        serious damage to United States national security or foreign 
        policy; and
            (2) should use the authority described in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) to revoke the passports of United States 
                citizens who are fighting with, or otherwise providing 
                material support to, the Islamic State of Iraq and al-
                Sham; and
                    (B) to prevent such individuals from returning to 
                the United States to plan, coordinate, or carry out a 
                terrorist attack.

SEC. 2. QUARTERLY REPORTS.

    The Secretary of State shall submit a quarterly report, in 
classified and unclassified form, on the use of the authority described 
in section 1 to--
            (1) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
            (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
            (3) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
        Affairs of the Senate;
            (4) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate;
            (5) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
        Representatives;
            (6) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives;
            (7) the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
        Representatives; and
            (8) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
        House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
#### VINCENT R. KREMER v. ANGELA BUCCISANO.

April 18, 1978.

Motion for leave to_appeal is granted.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Women celebrate a rich history of resiliency

              - Published  Aug. 26, 2021
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Savannah Slaughter, 75th Comptroller Squadron                                                    

**HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --  **
For 100 years, women and their allies worked to obtain equal rights. They deployed radical campaigns, hunger strikes and picketing at the White House.On Aug. 26, 1920, they achieved a major victory. The **19th Amendment** was signed, prohibiting the government from denying the right to vote based on sex, giving women the right to vote.Over eight million women across this nation were able to vote for the first time. Throughout history, women have continued to persevere and speak out for those whose voices have been stifled.Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony organized the first women’s rights convention in 1869. Tired of being denied their ability to participate in the American political process, they would spark the fight for a universal suffrage amendment to the U.S. Constitution.One hundred twenty-five years later, President Richard Nixon issued Proclamation 4147 designating August 26, 1972, as Women’s Rights Day.The rapid progression of women’s rights in the 20th century can be attributed to the many brave and dedicated women, who risked it all to guarantee the rights they deserved.Lucy Stone, an anti-slavery activist, was the first to sign the Universal Suffrage Petition, which started it all.Adelina Otero Warren, a Mexican-American activist, insisted New Mexico ratify the 19th Amendment and organized support from the Spanish-speaking community.Frances Willard, president of the Women’s Christian Temperance Union, organized for women to sign their petition to fight for women’s right to vote.Ida B. Wells, a civil rights activist, refused to allow segregation to keep her from marching in the main procession with her state during the 1913 Women's Suffrage Parade.Although Native Americans were not granted citizenship and voting rights until 1924, Marie Louise Bottineau Baldwin, a Native American activist, fought for women’s right to vote.Similarly, Mabel Lee, a Chinese activist, led marches in New York to have the Exclusion Act repealed to allow Chinese immigrants to become naturalized citizens so they could have the right to vote.Women’s Equality Day doesn’t just commemorate the passing of the 19th Amendment, but calls attention to the efforts toward full equality that continue to this day.Women have made many important contributions to the quality of American life over the years. There is still much that can be done, but we are moving to a prosperous future.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceWomen’s Rights Dayobservancesdiversityequality19th AmendmentAFMCAir Force Materiel Command
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          103,666
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,045,645
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,274,494
<PP&E>                          411,284
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,532,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           15,804,374
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10,335
<OTHER-SE>                      (7,754,414)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,532,009
<SALES>                         54,211,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                54,391,559
<CGS>                           51,824,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   51,824,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,932,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              207,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,114,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,114,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,114,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.11)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-16-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2001
<CASH>                                          1,046,140
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     442,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       322,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,021,424
<PP&E>                                          8,809,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,189,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,119,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,248,151
<BONDS>                                         2,235,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        4,746,520
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,479,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,119,188
<SALES>                                        12,271,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,689,513
<CGS>                                           7,520,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,570,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                300,945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   897,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                      309,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               587,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      587,706
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.31


</TABLE>
[No. 18130-8-III.

Division Three.

April 6, 2000.]

#### Daniel E. Rennick, *Respondent,*v. GTE Directories Sales Corporation, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 93-2-05641-3, Linda G. Tompkins, J., entered December 17, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Brown, J.
Exhibit 23.1     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   To the Board of Directors Mobile Vault, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Cameron Park, California   We hereby consent to the inclusion in this form 10-K, Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of our report dated June 22, 2012 relating to the financial statements of Mobile Vault, Inc. as of and for the year ended May 31, 2012.   /s/ ZS Consulting Group LLP Melville, New York February 27, 2013   115 Broad Hollow Road, Suite 350     Melville, New York 11747 Tel: (516) 394-3344     Fax:  (516) 908-7867 www.zmscpas.com
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XY41


Marine Mammals; File No. 15014

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Sea World, LLC, 9205 South Park 
Center Loop, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32819 [Brad Andrews, Responsible 
Party] has been issued a permit to import one pilot whale (Globicephala 
macrorhynchus) for public display.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Skidmore or Laura Morse, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 2, 2009, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (74 FR 63119) that a request for a public display 
permit to import one male pilot whale, from the Kamogawa SeaWorld, 
Chiba, Japan to Sea World of California, had been submitted by the 
above-named organization. The requested permit has been issued under 
the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the regulations governing the taking and 
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-22518 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S