Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices 56055 

7A party named or added to temporary denial 

order as a related person may appeal its inclusion 

as a related person, but not the underlying basis for 

the issuance of the TDO. See Section 766.23(c). 

8A party named or added as a related person may 

not oppose the issuance or renewal of a temporary 

denial order, but may file an appeal in accordance 

with Section 766.23(c). See also note 7, supra. 

Kosarian Fard’s written testimony in 

the U.K. litigation included the 

following concerning his ‘‘close 

relationship’’ with Mahan Airways and 

some of the acts he took at its direction: 

As I have said, I was majority shareholder 

of Blue [Airways] but in the summer of 2007, 

I agreed to sell a 51% stake in Blue to Skyco 

(UK) Ltd. I did this at the request of Mahan. 

Given my close relationship with Mahan, I 

did not ask questions but, again, acted on the 

basis of the trust I had in Mr. Arabnejad and 

Mr. Mahmoudi [two Mahan Airways’ 

directors]. 

Kosarian Fard Written Statement to U.K. 

Court (signed and dated May 27, 2009 

by hand), at page 7, paragraph 12. 

The record also shows that Gatewick 

is located at the same G#22 Dubai 

Airport Free Zone location formerly 

used by the Blue Airways FZE and Blue 

Airways UAE. 

Based on the information provided by 

OEE and Gatewick’s submission, I find 

that Gatewick’s significant and on-going 

business relationship and/or 

connections with Mahan Airways 

satisfies the requirements of Section 

766.23, and that Gatewick’s addition to 

the TDO as a related person is necessary 

to prevent evasion. This is demonstrated 

not only by the nature and significance 

of Gatewick’s relationship with Mahan 

Airways and its stated role as Mahan 

Airways’ sole booking agent in the UAE 

for Mahan’s cargo and freight 

forwarding services, but also by 

Gatewick’s participation with Mahan 

Airways in the 2009 transaction 

involving the export of computer 

motherboards to Iran, via the UAE, in 

violation of the outstanding TDO against 

Mahan. It is further demonstrated by 

Kosarian Fard’s central role at Gatewick, 

as Managing Director and owner, his 

admitted close relationship with Mahan 

Airways, and the prominent role he 

played in the unlawful re-export of 

Aircraft 1–3 to Mahan. 

IV. Order 

It is therefore ordered: 

First, that MAHAN AIRWAYS, Mahan 

Tower, No. 21, Azadegan St., M.A. 

Jenah Exp.Way, Tehran, Iran, and 

GATEWICK LLC, A/K/A GATEWICK 

FREIGHT & CARGO SERVICES, A/K/A 

GATEWICK AVIATION SERVICE, G#22 

Dubai Airport Free Zone, P.O. Box 

393754, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 

and P.O. Box 52404, Dubai, United Arab 

Emirates, and Mohamed Abdulla Alqaz 

Building, Al Maktoum Street, Al Rigga, 

Dubai, United Arab Emirates (each a 

‘‘Denied Person’’ and collectively the 

‘‘Denied Persons’’), may not, directly or 

indirectly, participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(‘‘EAR’’), or in any other activity subject 

to the EAR including, but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the EAR, or in any other 

activity subject to the EAR; or 

C. Benefiting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the EAR, or in any 

other activity subject to the EAR. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of a Denied Person any item subject to 

the EAR; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

a Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States, 

including financing or other support 

activities related to a transaction 

whereby a Denied Person acquires or 

attempts to acquire such ownership, 

possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from a Denied Person of any 

item subject to the EAR that has been 

exported from the United States; 

D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the 

United States any item subject to the 

EAR with knowledge or reason to know 

that the item will be, or is intended to 

be, exported from the United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by a Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by a Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States. For 

purposes of this paragraph, servicing 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to a Denied Person 

by affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of this 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the EAR where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the EAR are the foreign-produced direct 

product of U.S.-origin technology. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Sections 766.24(e) and 766.23(c)(2) of 

the EAR, Mahan Airways and/or 

Gatewick LLC may, at any time, appeal 

this Order by filing a full written 

statement in support of the appeal with 

the Office of the Administrative Law 

Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing 

Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21202–4022.7

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed as provided in 

Section 766.24(d), by filing a written 

submission with the Assistant Secretary 

of Commerce for Export Enforcement, 

which must be received not later than 

seven days before the expiration date of 

the Order.8

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to Mahan Airways and Gatewick LLC 

and shall be published in the Federal 

Register. This Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

for 180 days. 

Issued this 3rd day of September 2010. 

David W. Mills, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23011 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XY91 

Advisory Committee and Species 

Working Group Technical Advisor 

Appointments 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
56056 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices 

ACTION: Nominations. 

SUMMARY: NMFS is soliciting 

nominations to the Advisory Committee 

to the U.S. Section to the International 

Commission for the Conservation of 

Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) as established 

by the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 

1975 (ATCA). NMFS is also soliciting 

nominations for technical advisors to 

the Advisory Committee’s species 

working groups. 

DATES: Nominations must be received 

by October 15, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Nominations to the 

Advisory Committee or for technical 

advisors to a species working group 

should be sent to Ms. Rachel O’Malley, 

Office of International Affairs, National 

Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Room 

9540, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 

Spring, MD 20910. A copy should also 

be sent to Keith Cialino, Office of 

International Affairs, National Marine 

Fisheries Service, Room 12641, 1315 

East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 

20910. Nominations can also be 

provided via fax (301–713–2313) or email (Rachel.O’Malley@noaa.gov and 

Keith.Cialino@noaa.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keith Cialino, 301–713–9090. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

971b of ATCA (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.) 

requires that an advisory committee be 

established that shall be composed of: 

(1) Not less than five nor more than 20 

individuals appointed by the U.S. 

Commissioners to ICCAT who shall 

select such individuals from the various 

groups concerned with the fisheries 

covered by the ICCAT Convention; and 

(2) the chairs (or their designees) of the 

New England, Mid-Atlantic, South 

Atlantic, Caribbean, and Gulf Fishery 

Management Councils. Each member of 

the Advisory Committee appointed 

under paragraph (1) shall serve for a 

term of 2 years and shall be eligible for 

reappointment. Members of the 

Advisory Committee may attend all 

public meetings of the ICCAT 

Commission, Council, or any Panel and 

any other meetings to which they are 

invited by the ICCAT Commission, 

Council, or any Panel. The Advisory 

Committee shall be invited to attend all 

nonexecutive meetings of the U.S. 

Commissioners to ICCAT and, at such 

meetings, shall be given the opportunity 

to examine and be heard on all 

proposed programs of investigation, 

reports, recommendations, and 

regulations of the ICCAT Commission. 

Members of the Advisory Committee 

shall receive no compensation for such 

services. The Secretary of Commerce 

and the Secretary of State may pay the 

necessary travel expenses of members of 

the Advisory Committee. There are 

currently 19 appointed Advisory 

Committee members. The terms of these 

members expire on December 31, 2010. 

New appointments will be made as soon 

as possible, but will not take effect until 

January 1, 2011. 

Section 971b–1 of ATCA specifies 

that the U.S. Commissioners may 

establish species working groups for the 

purpose of providing advice and 

recommendations to the U.S. 

Commissioners and to the Advisory 

Committee on matters relating to the 

conservation and management of any 

highly migratory species covered by the 

ICCAT Convention. Any species 

working group shall consist of no more 

than seven members of the Advisory 

Committee and no more than four 

scientific or technical advisors, as 

considered necessary by the 

Commissioners. Currently, there are 

four species working groups advising 

the Committee and the U.S. 

Commissioners: a Bluefin Tuna Working 

Group, a Swordfish and Sharks Working 

Group, a Billfish Working Group, and a 

BAYS (Bigeye, Albacore, Yellowfin, and 

Skipjack) Tunas Working Group. 

Technical Advisors to the species 

working groups serve at the request of 

the U.S. Commissioners; therefore, the 

Commissioners can choose to alter 

appointments at any time. 

Nominations to the Advisory 

Committee or to a species working 

group should include a letter of interest 

and a resume or curriculum vitae. 

Letters of recommendation are useful 

but not required. Self-nominations are 

acceptable. When making a nomination, 

please clearly specify which 

appointment (Advisory Committee 

member or technical advisor to a species 

working group) is being sought. 

Requesting consideration for placement 

on both the Advisory Committee and a 

species working group is acceptable. 

Those interested in a species working 

group technical advisor appointment 

should indicate which of the four 

working groups is preferred. Placement 

on the requested species working group, 

however, is not guaranteed. 

Dated: September 7, 2010. 

Rebecca Lent, 

Director, Office of International Affairs, 

National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23015 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Census Bureau 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; Manufacturers’ 

Shipments, Inventories, and Orders 

Benchmark Supplement 

AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

Respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). 

DATES: To ensure consideration written 

comments must be submitted on or 

before November 15, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Diana Hynek, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at DHynek@doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument(s) and instructions should 

be directed to Chris Savage, U.S. Census 

Bureau, Room 7K071, Washington, DC 

20233–6900, (301) 763–4832, or via the 

internet at John.C.Savage@census.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

The Manufacturers’ Shipments, 

Inventories, and Orders (M3) survey 

collects monthly data on shipments, 

inventories, and orders from domestic 

manufacturing companies. The purpose 

of the M3 survey is to provide early 

broad-based monthly statistical data on 

current economic conditions and 

indications of future production 

commitments in the manufacturing 

sector. The orders, as well as the 

shipments and inventory data, are used 

widely and are valuable tools for 

analysis of business cycle conditions. 

Major data users include: Members of 

the Council of Economic Advisers, 

Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal 

Reserve Board, Conference Board, 

Treasury Department, and the business 

community. 

The monthly M3 Survey data reflect 

primarily the month-to-month changes 

of companies within the survey. The M3 

survey collects data for 89 industry 

categories of which 13 provide nonVerDate Mar<15>2010 18:57 Sep 14, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES