alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 436 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 436

  To require that the salaries of Members of Congress be sequestered 
 during any sequester under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
                          Control Act of 1985.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2013

 Mr. Nelson (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require that the salaries of Members of Congress be sequestered 
 during any sequester under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
                          Control Act of 1985.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sequester for Congressional Pay and 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. SEQUESTERING THE PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Member Sequester.--Section 251 of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Congressional Pay.--
            ``(1) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `furlough 
        period' means each period--
                    ``(A) beginning on the effective date of the first 
                furlough of any individual employed by the Federal 
                Government relating to a sequestration order issued 
                under this Act; and
                    ``(B) ending on the last day of the fiscal year to 
                which the sequestration order described in subparagraph 
                (A) applies.
            ``(2) Pay reduction.--During a furlough period, the pay of 
        each Member of Congress shall be reduced by the greatest 
        percentage by which the pay of an individual employed by the 
        Federal Government is reduced as a result of a furlough 
        relating to the sequestration order for that furlough 
        period.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date 
        of enactment of this section.
            (2) 27th amendment.--If the application of the amendment 
        made by subsection (a) to the pay of Members of Congress 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) is held to be unconstitutional under 
        the XXVII Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, 
        the amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect upon the 
        convening of the 114th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,817,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,335,656<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                  8,505,953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,998,171
<PP&E>                                         394,120<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,966,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,254,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     2,917,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,698,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,966,080
<SALES>                                     13,333,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,333,684
<CGS>                                       10,229,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,229,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (229,484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (78,025)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (151,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (151,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE ASSET VALUES FOR RECEIVABLES AND PP&E REPRESENT AMOUNTS NET OF ALLOWANCES
AND DEPRECIATION RESPECTIVELY
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANTTO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection withthe report on Form 10-K of Skajaquoda Group, inc., for theperiod ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, I, Einar Agustsson, do hereby certify, pursuant to18 USC. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in this report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the periodcovered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for theperiod covered by this report.

 

 

Date: May 14, 2012

 

 

/s/Einar Agustsson

Einar Agustsson

Chief ExecutiveOfficer 

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrantand will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5013]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 AUTHORIZING THE CLERK TO MAKE CORRECTIONS IN ENGROSSMENT OF H.R. 961, 
                     CLEAN WATER AMENDMENTS OF 1995

  Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that, in the 
engrossment of the bill, H.R. 961, the Clerk be authorized to correct 
section numbers, punctuation, and cross references and to make such 
other technical and conforming changes as may be necessary to reflect 
the actions of the House in amending the bill, H.R. 961.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Pennsylvania?
  There was no objection.
  

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5681]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       TRIBUTE TO DENNIS GRIFFIN

 Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to 
Dennis Griffin, a resident of Bowling Green, KY, who is being 
recognized as one of the top local developers in the Nation. Mr. 
Griffin is 1 of 10 economic developers who received a leadership award 
from the American Economic Development Council.
  Mr. Griffin has been president of the Bowling Green-Warren County 
Chamber of Commerce since 1986, the same year he moved to Kentucky. 
Since taking over as president of the chamber of commerce the local 
economy has soared. Mr. Griffin is best described by Bowling Green 
Mayor Johnny Webb in a recent article in the Daily News. Mayor Webb 
said,

       Things were not going too well in Bowling Green. It had 
     been some time since we had recruited a new industry. It was 
     almost like a lightbulb coming on when (Griffin) came in and 
     got his feet on the ground. He is the catalyst to 
     development.

  Mr. President, during the last 9 years, Mr. Griffin has worked hard 
to develop the region. He is responsible for starting 56 new companies, 
and establishing 6,000 new jobs; an investment of more than $400 
million in the community. But that's not all, Mr. Griffin also worked 
hard to help 72 existing industries expand, which created an additional 
2,500 jobs, investing another $100 million in the community.
  Mr. Griffin, just like the Energizer Bunny, is still going strong 
even after 9 years of service. In the last year alone, 10 new plants 
have decided to call Bowling Green their home and 9 companies have 
expanded.
  Mr. President, I ask my colleagues to join me in paying tribute to 
this outstanding Kentuckian. I think that all will agree that through 
his hard work and dedication for his community, Mr. Griffin proves that 
he truly deserves the honor of being one of the country's top local 
developers.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E997]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         IN HONOR OF GILBERT HERRERA, OUTSTANDING YOUNG TEXAS-EX

                                 ______

                           HON. RALPH M. HALL

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 10, 1995
  Mr. HALL of Texas. Mr. Speaker, it is my privilege to rise today to 
pay tribute to Gilbert A. Herrera, a recipient of the 1995 Outstanding 
Young Texas-Ex Award. Gilbert was a page in the Texas Senate during the 
time that I was a Texas State Senator, and we have been great friends 
ever since. Gilbert's intelligence, enthusiasm, and commitment to 
excellence have served him well, culminating with this prestigious 
honor.
  The Outstanding Young Texas-Ex Award has been presented annually 
since 1980 by the Ex-Students' Association to four alumni under the age 
of 41 who have excelled in their chosen fields of endeavor and have 
shown loyalty to the University of Texas. The 1995 award will be 
presented during UT's spring commencement ceremonies on Saturday, May 
20.
  Gilbert graduated from UT in 1978 with a B.B.A. degree in finance. He 
is a principal of G.A. Herrera & Co., a private investment banking firm 
with offices in Houston and Austin, and he is also a consultant on 
corporate governance. Gilbert previously served in a variety of 
corporate finance and banking positions. In 1993 he was appointed by 
the Supreme Court of Texas to the Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 
where he serves as chair of its budget committee.
  Gilbert also has been active in community service. He is a member of 
the Board of Advisors for the Texas Product Development Commission. In 
Houston he served on the Houston Parks Board and as trustee of the 
Harris County Mental Health and Mental Retardation Authority, where he 
chaired the Legislative and Employee Benefits Committees. Gilbert is a 
life member of the Ex-Students' Association, a lifetime member of the 
Century Club, a member of the Littlefield Society, the UT Chancellor's 
Council, the MBA Investment Fund, L.L.C., and the Longhorn Associates 
for Women's Athletics.
  Gilbert and his wife, Kari, have been personal friends of mine for 
many years. Today I join their family and many friends in offering my 
sincere congratulations to this outstanding young Texas Ex on his 
selection for this prestigious award. His achievements are a source of 
pride for his family, his friends, and the University of Texas, and I 
know that he will continue to distinguish himself in his profession as 
well as in his service to his community, his State, and his country.

                          ____________________
```
#### Coats et ux. *v.*Clanin et ux.

[No. 18,950.

Filed January 24, 1958.]

*Alva Cox,*of Muncie, for appellants.

*Brady & Watson,*of Muncie, for appellees.

Royse, P. J.

We are informed by appellants’ brief that appellees brought this action against appellants for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate which was being purchased by appellees from appellants. It is stated the issues were formed by appellees’ complaint, appellants’ answer in two paragraphs, the first of admission and denial under the rules and the second alleging repudiation and breach of contract, and appellees’ reply to the second paragraph of answer.

Trial to the court resulted in judgment that appellees were entitled to specific performance of the contract, *196and damages in the sum of $100.00. Appellants’ motion for a new trial on the grounds the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law was overruled. The error assigned here is the overruling of that motion.

Appellants’ brief does not set out the pleadings that were filed in the trial. Under the heading, “Concise Statement of So Much of the Record As Fully Presents Every Error and Objection Relied On,” they set out only the finding and judgment of the court.

Under the heading, “Condensed Recital of the Evidence in Narrative Form,” frequent reference is made to a contract for purchase of real estate between appellants and appellees, and it is stated this contract was introduced in evidence. But nowhere in the brief is the contract set out in whole or in substance. The same is true of other exhibits referred to in the recital of evidence. We have only appellants’ conclusions as to what these exhibits provided.

While we always prefer to decide cases on their merits, this Court and the Supreme Court have repeatedly held that we, as well as the litigants, are bound by the Rules of the Supreme Court. This Court cannot, without searching the record, determine the questions which appellants seek to raise. This we are not required to do.

Because of the failure of appellants to comply with Rule 2-17 (b)-(d), no question is presented. *Mendenhall, Extr., etc.*v. *Mendenhall*(1955), 125 Ind. App. 519, 124 N. E. 2d 873 (Transfer denied) ; *Bennett*v. *James H. Drew Corporation*(1956), 126 Ind. App. 557, 133 N. E. 2d 886; *Waters et al.*v. *Perfect Circle Corporation*(1953), 124 Ind. App. 70, 114 N. E. 2d 436; *Hughes et al.*v. *The State Bank of West Terre Haute*(1954), 124 Ind. App. 511, 117 N. E. 2d 563*197(Transfer denied); *Witte*v. *Witte et al.*(1953), 123 Ind. App. 644, 113 N. E. 2d 166.

The judgment is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 147 N. E. 2d 555.
**Exhibit 15.2**

** **

 

December 4, 2017

 

**iKang Healthcare Group, Inc.**

B-6F Shimao Tower, 92A Jianguo Road

Chaoyang District

Beijing 100022

People’s Republic of China

 

Attention: The Board of Directors

 

Dear Sirs,

 

**Re: iKang Healthcare Group, Inc. (the “Company”)**

 

We, King & Wood Mallesons, consent to the reference to our firm under the captions of “Item 3.D — Risk Factors” in iKang Healthcare Group, Inc.’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended March 31, 2017, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of December 2017.

 

 
| Yours faithfully                     |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| /s/ King & Wood Mallesons   |   |
| **King & Wood   Mallesons** |   |

 

 

----
[No. 23189-1-II.

Division Two.

March 31, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard W. Bennett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 97-1-00449-0, E Mark McCauley and David E. Foscue, JJ., entered April 13, 1998. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Hunt, J., and Tabor, J. Pro Tern.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D555-D556]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
MEDICARE PROGRAM
Committee on Appropriations: Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human 
Services, and Education held hearings to examine waste, fraud, and 
abuse in the Medicare Program, receiving testimony from Frank Reilly, 
Director, Accounting and Information Management Division, IRM-HEHS 
Group, General Accounting Office; Steve Pelovitz, Associate 
Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration, Department of 
Health and Human Services; Nancy Boyer, Equifax Analytical Services, 
Inc., Fairport, New York; John T. Kelly, GMIS Incorporated, Malvern, 
Pennsylvania; and Leroy Henrich, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Oregon, 
Portland.
[[Page D556]]

  Subcommittee will meet again on Thursday, May 11.
AUTHORIZATIONS--DEFENSE
Committee on Armed Services: Subcommittee on Acquisition and Technology 
held hearings on S. 727, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
1996 for military activities of the Department of Defense and to 
prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 1996, focusing 
on the implications of the revolution in military affairs, receiving 
testimony from Adm. William A. Owens, USN, Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs 
of Staff; Andrew W. Marshall, Director, Net Assessment, Department of 
Defense; and Andrew Krepinevich, Defense Budget Project, and Daniel 
Goure, Center for Strategic and International Studies, both of 
Washington, D.C.
  Subcommittee will meet again on Wednesday, May 17.
```
NUMBER 13-14-00231-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE OLD AMERICAN COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Temporary Relief.

ORDER

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus on April 22, 2014, contending that the trial court abused its discretion 

by denying relator’s plea to the jurisdiction. The Court requests that the real parties in 

interest, Melissa Rosales, or any others whose interest might be directly affected by the 

relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the 

expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of April, 2014.
[No. 44205-8-I.

Division One.

April 24, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Estate of*Estella Dearbone. Simon L. Dearbone, *Appellant,*v. Margaret K. Dore, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-4-01931-6, Donald D. Haley, J., entered January 29, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Baker and Kennedy, JJ.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA 18

- 282 Filed: 3 July 2018 Chatham County, Nos. 15

- JT

- 47 , 48 IN THE MATTER OF: L.V., A.V.
Appeal by R espondent

- M other from orders entered 5 December 2017 by Judge Beverly Scarlett in Chatham County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 21 June 2018

. W. Michael Spivey , for respondent

- appellant mother. Holcomb & Stephenson, LLP, by Deana K. Fleming, for petitioner

- appellee Chatham County Department of Social Services. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, by Jessica L. Gorczynski, for guardian ad litem

.
MURPHY , Judge.
Respondent appeals from orders terminating her parental rights to the minor children L.V. and A .V. O n appeal, R espondent’s appellate counsel filed a no

- merit brief pursuant to Rule 3.1(d) stating that, after a conscientious and thorough review of the record on appe al, he has concluded that the record contains no issue of merit on which to base an argument for reli ef

. 1 N.C. R. App. P. 3.1(d)

. Respondent ’s counsel

1 In accordance with Rule 3.1(d), appellate counsel provided R espondent with copies of the no

merit brief, trial transcript, and record on appeal and advised her of her right to file a brief with this Court pro se on 11 April 2018.I N RE : L.V., A.V. Opinion of the Court

- 2

- complied with all requirements of Rule 3.1(d) , and Respondent did not exercise her right under Rule 3.1(d) to file a pro se brief. No issues have been argued or preserved for review in accordance with our Rules of Appellate Procedure

. 2 DISMISSED

. Judge s DIETZ and TYSON concur.

2 “Rule 3.1(d) does not grant indigent parents the right to receive an Anders

- type rev iew of the record by our Court, to consider issues not properly raised.” State v. Velasquez

- Cardenas , __ N.C. App. __, __, __ S.E.2d __, __, slip op. concurrence at 3 (filed 17 April 201 8 ) (Dillon, J. , concurring) (No. COA1 7

- 422 ).
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
58.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2019, as amended by Amendment No.2 thereto (the “Report”), I, Jinbo Yao,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



June 12, 2019



|/s/ Jinbo Yao |                        
|------------- | -----------------------
|Name:         | Jinbo Yao              
|Title:        | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Colombia Resources, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. John Campo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.   New Colombia Resources, Inc.Date: August 14, 2014By:/s/ John CampoJohn CampoChief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LORENZO MOTLEY.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.