alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

   

   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

   

   

   In connection with the annual report of mCig, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

   

   Dated: November25, 2016

   

   /s/ Michael W. Hawkins

   Michael W. Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer

   (Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E960]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   TRIBUTE TO MEDICAL GROUP MISSIONS

                                 ______

                            HON. BILL BAKER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. BAKER of California. Mr. Speaker, recently a physician from my 
district, Dr. Neil Wilson of Orinda, traveled to Ecuador for 2 weeks to 
help Indians in three Andean villages. He went with a group called 
Medical Group Missions, a nondenominational association designed to 
provide assistance to needy people worldwide.
  The trip was put together by nurse Diana Bennett, with whom Dr. 
Wilson had served on the staff of Mt. Diablo Hospital.
  As related by Dorothy Bowen in an article in ``The Contra Costa 
Sun,'' Dr. Wilson in 1993 journeyed to Zimbabwe, treating AIDS 
patients, living in cement block houses and working with serious ill 
patients.
  This year he traveled to South America. In describing his trip to 
Ecuador, Dr. Wilson said:

       We represent Jesus and His teaching and also our country * 
     * *. The greatest gift was from them to us. They are 
     beautiful people who have the courage to carry on day after 
     day. It's hard to complain about my life after I get home.

  It's an honor for me to recognize Dr. Wilson, Diana Bennett and the 
team that traveled to Ecuador. The work of these outstanding 
Californians reminds each of us the value of selfless service. I am 
pleased to recognize them today in the Congressional Record.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6752-S6753]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED

                                 ______

                  THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT OF 1995

                                 ______

                 MURRAY (AND GORTON) AMENDMENT NO. 1079

  Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mr. Gorton) proposed an amendment to the 
bill (S. 534) to amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide 
authority for States to limit the interstate transportation of 
municipal solid waste, and for other purposes; as follows:

       Title II, following section (f) State Solid Waste District 
     Authority, add the following section (g) and reletter all the 
     following subsections accordingly:
       ``(g) State Mandated Solid Waste Management Planning.--A 
     political subdivision of a state may exercise flow control 
     authority for municipal solid waste, and for voluntarily 
     relinquished recyclable material that is generated within its 
     jurisdiction, if State legislation enacted prior to January 
     1, 1990 mandated the political subdivision to plan for the 
     management of solid waste generated within its jurisdiction, 
     and if prior to January 1, 1990 the State delegated to its 
     political subdivisions the authority to establish a system of 
     solid waste handling, and if prior to May 15, 1994:
       ``(1) the political subdivision had, in accordance with the 
     plan adopted pursuant to such State mandate, obligated itself 
     through contract (including a contract to repay a debt) to 
     utilize existing solid waste facilities or an existing system 
     of solid waste facilities; and
       ``(2) the political subdivision is currently undertaking a 
     recycling program in accordance with its adopted waste 
     management plan to meet the State's solid waste reduction 
     goal of fifty percent; and
       ``(3) significant financial commitments have been made, or 
     bonds have been issued, a major portion of which, were used 
     for the construction of solid waste management facilities.''
       [[Page S6753]] On page 65, line 10, strike ``or (e)'' and 
     insert ``(e) or (f).''
     

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5174]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New York [Mr. Owens] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. OWENS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 4.9

(incorporated  by reference from  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2003)









                                       21




<PAGE>
#### C. M. Holden v. Meyer & Buete.

(No. 1413, Op. Book No. 2, p. 702.)

Appeal from Aransas County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 829. *Attachment; petition in, need not contain prayer for.*In an attachment suit it is not nécessary that the pleadings of the plaintiff should contain a prayer asking for the issuance of the writ. When the proper affidavit is made and the bond given, it is the duty of the clerk to issue the writ, whether the writ is prayed for in terms or not.

§ 830. *Same; bond signed in name of firm by'agent.*The attachment bond was signed ‘ ‘ Meyer & Buete, *per G.*Tandy,” omitting to state that Tandy executed the same as agent for plaintiffs in attachment. *Held,*that this was sufficient. This precise point was determined in Messner v. Lewis, 20 Tex. 221.

§ 831. *Same; petition in, need not be sworn to.*Article 138, Pas. Dig., requiring the petition in an attachment suit, etc., to he sworn to, is no longer in force, having been repealed by the Revised Statutes. Hence, if the facts which authorize the issuance of the writ be properly stated in an affidavit, it is no objection to the validity of the proceeding that the petition has not been sworn to.

§ 832. *Verdict; sufficiently certain when, etc.*The plaintiffs sued upon two accepted drafts. The defendant pleaded in reconvention for damages. The verdict of the jury was: “ We, the jury, find for the plaintiff for the full amount of the notes, with lawful interest thereon, and we, the jury, further find no damages for the defendant.” *Held,*that this verdict was sufficiently certain. That is certain which can be reduced to a certainty. The evident intention of the jury was to find for the plaintiffs the full amount of principal and interest due on the drafts sued upon, and this amount could be certainly as*476certained by reference to the drafts themselves. The verdict also disposed of the defendant’s plea in reconvention.

February 10, 1883.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         177,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,026,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                   316,272
<INVENTORY>                                 60,345,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            96,900,345
<PP&E>                                      77,274,320
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,320,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             236,365,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       83,825,347
<BONDS>                                     76,356,825
<COMMON>                                        75,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,030,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               236,365,513
<SALES>                                     86,526,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,526,480
<CGS>                                       70,467,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,467,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,290,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,253
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,458,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,290,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,716,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,574,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,574,169
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36



</TABLE>
#### Isa Smith v. E. G. Chiles.

(No. 1172, Op. Book No. 3, p. 473.)

Appeal from Grayson County.

January 29, 1881.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 124. *Handwriting; proof of, hy comparison.*Handwriting may be proved by comparison, that is, by comparing the handwriting of a signature or document admitted to be genuine, and already in the case, with the signature or document in dispute. Thus, the disputed signature of the alleged maker of a note sued upon may be proved by comparing it with the admitted signature of the maker to a deposition in evidence in the case. [1 Greenl. Ev. § 578.] See, also, a full discussion of proof of handwriting by comparison in Phillips v. The State, 6 Ct. App. 364; Hatch v. State, id. 384; Heard v. State, 9 Ct. App. 1.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patrick Gosselin hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of B-Maven, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of B-Maven, Inc.  Dated:/s/ Patrick GosselinPatrick GosselinPresident, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)B-Maven, Inc.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to B-Maven, Inc. and will be retained by B-Maven, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification**

 

In connection with the annual report of Acquity Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)                                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 8, 2013

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Paul Weinewuth      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Paul Weinewuth          |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4800]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                REPUBLICAN BUDGET AND NATION'S CHILDREN

  (Mr. POMEROY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. POMEROY. Mr. Speaker, we had a long day in the House Committee on 
the Budget yesterday. I am here to tell Members about one aspect of the 
Republican plan to balance the budget that they do not want to talk 
much about. That is about the deep cuts in Medicare, $184 billion over 
the next 7 years. And the impact of these would take health insurance 
away from 5 million kids that now have it. It is taking a health care 
problem in this country and making it much worse by depriving 5 million 
kids of health insurance coverage.
  The plan does not stop there, because it also assaults the elderly 
that depend upon Medicaid to help them defray the cost of nursing home 
expenses when they have exhausted their personal accounts. What will 
happen to some in a nursing home that has exhausted their life savings? 
Will they be put out on the street when the Republican Medicaid cuts 
begin to hit and there are no more funds available? Will they be forced 
to move in with their children who are already struggling to make it 
and provide for the college education of their children?
  These are questions that need to be answered as we flesh out the 
Republican budget. Disaster for kids; disaster for seniors.

                          ____________________
```
January 31, 2013.

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

YOLANDA MARIE WILLIAMS, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00508-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
News United States Air Force
 CSAF Leadership Library: November 2021Published Nov. 17, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                *"It takes humility to reconsider our past commitments, doubt to question our present decisions, and curiosity to reimagine our future plans." – Adam Grant*

**Airmen,**

When was the last time you changed your mind? In **Think Again**, Dr. Adam Grant offers prescriptions for our Airmen to "rethink" by seeking out information that goes against our entrenched or bureaucratic views. With time, facts and assumptions change that inform a new decision. As a result, individual and collective rethinking should be done on a recurring basis to maintain our competitive advantage against our pacing challenge.

To inform our rethinking, Dr. Rush Doshi provides a masterclass on rethinking our blind spots regarding China's strategic ambitions. In **The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order**, Dr. Doshi unpacks the complex tapestry of China's grand strategy.

One rethinking pitfall, "hindsight bias," clouds how we view the past in the retrospect of the present. **Katy Milkman's**Choiceology Podcast "Knew It All Along" shows us how to avoid selectively choosing details to make sense of the past.

Finally, I invite you to watch the Air Force Public Affairs Emmy® Award-winning documentary **Red Tail Angels – The Story of The Tuskegee Airmen**. Nearly 75 years ago, the Tuskegee Airmen pioneered a new paradigm of diversity within military aviation. Today, **Action Order A** challenges us to rethink the standards of our **pilot selection process** to identify and remove potential barriers.

I encourage you to think about these insightful topics and share your thoughts and ideas with your fellow Airmen.


Sincerely,**CHARLES Q. BROWN, JR.
General, U.S. Air Force
Chief of Staff**



*Editor's note: The **CSAF Leadership Library** is a fluid set of media selected by Gen. Brown that evolves as novel ideas are published, recorded, and debated. New entries will be added periodically throughout the year.*



****Recommendations:****





**Books**
   **Podcasts**
   **Documentaries****Think Again** 
   Adam Grant
   **Choiceology podcast "Knew it All Along"**
   Katy Milkman
   **Red Tail Angels: The Story and Legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen**
   Produced by Air Force Television Pentagon (SAF/PAI)**The Long Game**
   Rush DoshiCSAF 



Leadership Library 



USAF 



Chief  of Staff Air Force 



General Brown
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 47 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 47

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Medal of Honor Day to 
       celebrate and honor the recipients of the Medal of Honor.

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest award that can be bestowed to a member 
        of the Armed Forces for valor in action against an enemy force;
Whereas the Medal of Honor is awarded by the President, in the name of the 
        Congress, to members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished 
        themselves

              

conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of their lives above 
and beyond the call of duty;

Whereas the United States will forever be in debt to the recipients of the Medal 
        of Honor for their bravery and sacrifice in times of war or other armed 
        conflict;
Whereas the Medal of Honor was first awarded on March 25, 1863, during the Civil 
        War;
Whereas, of the millions of men and women who have served in the Armed Forces in 
        war, military operations, or other armed conflicts, only 3,443 members 
        have thus far been awarded the Medal of Honor;
Whereas 111 Medal of Honor recipients are still living as of January 1, 2007;
Whereas it is appropriate to commemorate and honor the recipients of the Medal 
        of Honor and to recognize their bravery and sacrifice for the United 
        States;
Whereas the designation of a National Medal of Honor Day would raise the 
        awareness of the American people regarding the significance and meaning 
        of the Medal of Honor and help focus the efforts of national, State, and 
        local organizations striving to foster public appreciation and 
        recognition of Medal of Honor recipients; and
Whereas March 25 would be an appropriate date to observe National Medal of Honor 
        Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the heroism and sacrifice of Medal of Honor 
        recipients for the United States;
            (2) recognizes the educational opportunity that a National 
        Medal of Honor Day would present to the American public; and
            (3) supports the goals and ideals of a National Medal of 
        Honor Day to celebrate and honor the contributions of Medal of 
        Honor recipients.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 27, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 375 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 375

  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2013

  Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
   Durbin, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Merkley, Mr. 
Begich, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Leahy, Mr. King, Ms. Warren, 
Mr. Franken, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, 
Mr. Cardin, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Graham, Mr. Reed, Mr. Baucus, and Mrs. 
   Shaheen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FILING BY SENATE CANDIDATES WITH COMMISSION.

    Section 302(g) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 432(g)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(g) Filing With the Commission.--All designations, 
        statements, and reports required to be filed under this Act 
        shall be filed with the Commission.''.
                                 <all>
```