alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2947 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2947

To amend the Federal Power Act to clarify the authority of the Federal 
  Energy Regulatory Commission to prescribe just, reasonable, and not 
     unduly discriminatory or preferential terms, conditions, and 
     compensation applicable to wholesale demand response resource 
 participation in organized wholesale energy, capacity, and ancillary 
                            service markets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2014

 Mr. Heinrich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Power Act to clarify the authority of the Federal 
  Energy Regulatory Commission to prescribe just, reasonable, and not 
     unduly discriminatory or preferential terms, conditions, and 
     compensation applicable to wholesale demand response resource 
 participation in organized wholesale energy, capacity, and ancillary 
                            service markets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF WHOLESALE DEMAND RESPONSE RESOURCES.

    Section 206(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824e(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by designating the first through third sentences as 
        paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Treatment of wholesale demand response resources.--
                    ``(A) Definitions.--In this paragraph:
                            ``(i) Demand response.--The term `demand 
                        response' means a reduction in the consumption 
                        of electric energy by customers from their 
                        expected consumption in response to an increase 
                        in the price of electric energy or to incentive 
                        payments designed to induce lower consumption 
                        of electric energy.
                            ``(ii) Demand response resource.--The term 
                        `demand response resource' means a resource 
                        capable of providing demand response.
                    ``(B) Authority.--The Commission may prescribe 
                just, reasonable, and not unduly discriminatory or 
                preferential terms, conditions, and compensation 
                applicable to wholesale demand response resource 
                participation in organized wholesale energy, capacity, 
                and ancillary service markets.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1028]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              DANVILLE ROTARY HONORED ON 75TH ANNIVERSARY

                                 ______

                         HON. PAUL E. KANJORKSI

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                          Friday, May 12, 1995
  Mr. KANJORSKI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to the Rotary 
Club of Danville, PA which is celebrating the 75th anniversary of its 
founding. I am pleased to have been invited to participate in the 
anniversary dinner on May 13 and to have this opportunity to bring the 
history of the club to the attention of my colleagues.
  Founded in 1905, by Paul Harris in Chicago, the Rotary has been an 
institution in America ever since. The first Rotary meeting consisted 
of Paul Harris and three other businessmen. Out of that meeting came 
the idea to form a men's club representing local business and the 
professions. Weekly meetings were held, in turn, at each member's place 
of business. This is how the organization came to be called Rotary.
  The purpose as defined by its founder was to undertake civic 
functions of value to the community. Mr. Harris was successful in his 
endeavor. Now known as Rotary International, the organization has grown 
to more than 25,000 clubs, in 172 countries, with membership well over 
a million and a quarter. In 1988, Rotary opened its membership to 
women.
  Fifteen years after Paul Harris founded Rotary, the Danville Rotary 
Club was organized and given its charter, No. 651. This club has served 
the community with dedication ever since. The club boasts three 
District Governors from its ranks from 1938 to 1993. The club joined 
with Bloomsburg and Berwick to found the Columbia-Montour Boy Scout 
Council in 1924. Boy Scout Camp Lavigne was named in honor of Jack 
Lavigne, a charter member of the Danville Rotary.
  Over the years, the club has sponsored a children's clinic, the 
student exchange program, Cub Pack 36, Crop Walk, Danville Community 
Center, Thomas Beaver Library, Edith Buckley Brown A.L.S. Foundation at 
Geisinger Medical Center, to name just a few of the club's 
beneficiaries. ``Service Above Self'', the motto of Rotary 
International, is the tradition of the Danville Club.
  Mr. Speaker, I am extremely proud of the strong and active influence 
of the Danville Rotary throughout my District. I am especially pleased 
to join with the Danville community in congratulating Danville Rotary 
on its 75th anniversary. We thank you for your dedication to your 
community, and for helping make Rotary synonymous with service.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 10.3



	 
	
1








	





 



 

	 
	
2








	





 



 

	 
	
3








	





 



 

	 
	
4








	





 



 

	 
	
5








	





 



 

	 
	
6








	





 



 

	 
	
7








	





 



 

	 
	
8








	





 



 

	 
	
9








	





 



 

	 
	
10








	





 



 

	 
	
11








	





 



 

	 
	
12








	





 



 

	 
	
13








	





 



 

	 
	
14








	





 



 

	 
	
15








	





 



 

	 
	
16








	





 



 

	 
	
17








	





 



 

	 
	
18








	





 



 

	 
	
19








	





 



 

	 
	
20








	





 



 

	 
	
21








	





 



 

	 
	
22








	





 



 

	 
	
23








	





 



 

	 
	
24








	





 



 

 

25
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Department of the Air Force stands up Task Force to combat interpersonal violence

              - Published  July 31, 2020
              -                             By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs                                                     

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The Department of the Air Force launched a task force to address concerns regarding interpersonal violence among service members.**Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett** appointed **Brig. Gen. April Vogel**, the director for manpower, personnel, recruiting and services at the **National Guard Bureau**, to lead the task force, which will support members of the Air Force and Space Force.“Interpersonal violence describes a wide spectrum of behaviors ranging from stalking and bullying to sexual assault, abuse and domestic violence,” Vogel said. “We know these types of violence exist in our communities and we are working hard to prevent them from happening. But recognizing prevention is not yet foolproof, we must ensure our Airmen and Space Professionals feel protected and have the resources and leadership necessary to keep them safe.”As Vogel stands up the task force, her initial focus will be developing a research-based plan of action that leverages existing data on violence among and against Airmen and Space Professionals.In support of the task force’s efforts, the secretary of the Air Force and service chiefs, **Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein** and **Chief of Space Operations Gen. John "Jay" Raymond**, directed the staff to review past cases involving interpersonal violence to identify any themes or areas for improvement.“We’ll also be asking our service members for their input to help shape our task force’s efforts,” Vogel said. “We know our Airmen and Space Professionals in the squadrons, particularly our young members, are the ones most affected by interpersonal violence. We need to hear their stories.”In a memo to the force, senior leaders from the Department denounced interpersonal violence and urged affected service members to ask for assistance.“Most importantly, if you are being threatened, harassed, stalked or bullied, please come forward and report it. As your leaders, we condemn any type of interpersonal violence in our force, and we will not tolerate it," the memo states. “If you feel uncomfortable reaching out to your commander or first sergeant, please reach out to another leader, mentor or person you trust ... You have options, and you do not have to do this alone.”Helping resources include the equal opportunity office, the chaplain, the inspector general, judge advocate office, family advocacy, violence prevention integrator and sexual assault response coordinator.The task force will ultimately be developing recommendations for senior leadership review focused on improving Department policies, processes and actions in this area.

 

 

AFWNUSAFAFAir Forcetask forceinterpersonal violenceharassmentbullyingsafetyreadinessTomorrow’s Air ForceSAFSecAFSecretary of the Air ForceNational Guard Bureau
[Cite as In re O.B. , 2022
- Ohio
- 2914.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

IN RE: O.B., et al. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO S

. CA20 22

- 04

- 0 19 CA2022

- 04

- 0 21 CA2022

- 04

- 02 2 D E C I S I O N 8/22/2022

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No s

. 21

- D000060; 21

- D000061; 21

- D000062

Tibbs Law Office, LL C , and Sarah E. Michel, for appellant. Ostrowski Law Firm, Co., L.P.A., and Andre a G. Ostrowski, for Mother

. Aaron Aldridge, for custodians.
Andrew J. Brenner, guardian ad litem. David Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michelle Belknap, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Warren County Children Services.

Per Curiam

. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the tran script of proceedings andWarren CA2022

- 04

- 0 19 CA2022

- 04

- 02 1 CA2022

- 04

- 02 2 original papers from the Warren C ounty Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Appellant's c ou nsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) , which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independ ently t o determine whether the proceed ings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicia l to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

M. POWELL , P.J., S. POWELL and BYRNE , JJ., concur.
[No. 1560.]

#### R. Thompson v. The State.

Opinion delivered November 28, 1883.

Constitutional Law—Indictment.—The Constitution of the State requires that indictments or informations shall conclude “against the peace and dignity of the State.” The omission of the word *the*before the word State is fatal to an indictment or information.

Appeal from the County Court of Delta. Tried below before the Hon. D. H. Lane, County Judge.

The information charged appellant and Wallace Thompson jointly with an aggravated assault upon W. T. McKinney. The appellant, being alone upon trial, was convicted and fined in the sum of twenty-five dollars.

*E. B. Perkins,*for the appellant.

*J. IT. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

ON MOTION POR RE-HEARING.

Willson, Judge.

In affirming the judgment in this case, on a former day of the term, a fatal defect in the information was overlooked. The information concludes “ against the peace and dignity of State,” instead of “against the peace and dignity of *the*State.” In *Wallace Thompson*v. *The State,*decided by this court at its present term *(ante,*p. 39), a precisely similar information was held to be bad. We therefore grant the motion for re-hearing; and, because the information is substantially and fatally defective, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*
<PAGE>   1


(11)--STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

EDAC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                                Three months ended             Six months ended
                              -------------------------     ------------------------
                                 July 4     June 30            July 4    June 30
                                  1998       1997               1998       1997     
                              ----------  -------------     ----------  ------------

<S>                          <C>            <C>            <C>          <C>
Basic:
  Weighted average
    shares outstanding (A)     4,233,845    4,175,096       4,225,925    4,156,763


    Net income                $  656,969   $  262,418      $1,322,655   $  518,379
                              ==========   ===========     ==========   ==========

    Basic earnings
    per common share          $     0.16   $     0.06       $    0.31   $     0.12
                              ===========  ===========      =========   ==========



Diluted:
  Weighted average
    shares outstanding (A)     4,233,845    4,175,096       4,225,925    4,156,763
  Net effect of dilutive
    stock options based on
    the treasury stock method
    using average market price   296,028      230,856         286,042      212,212
                              ----------   ----------       ---------   ----------

    Totals                     4,529,873    4,405,952       4,511,967    4,368,975
                               =========   ==========       =========   ==========

    Net income                $  656,969   $  262,418      $1,322,655   $  518,379
                              ==========   ==========      ==========   ==========

    Diluted earnings
    per common share          $     0.15  $     0.06       $     0.29   $     0.12
                              =========== ===========      ==========   ==========
</TABLE>




(A) Retroactively restated for the effect of the 10% stock dividend paid on July
1, 1998 to holders of record on June 16, 1998.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID MALDONADO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1200

[ September 28, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 14543CF10A

.

David Maldonado, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### J. Peak v. E. A. Blythe.

(No. 31, Op. Book No. 1, p. 168.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 7. *Parol evidence to vary written contract.*The general rule of. law is, that such evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary the terms of a valid written instrument. [1 Greenl. Ev. §§ 275, 276; Heatherly v. Record, 12 Tex. 50; Keith v. Garrett, 29 Tex. 52; Self v. King, 28 Tex. 553; Reid v. Allen, 18 Tex. 243; Rockmore v. Davenport, 14 Tex. 602.]

*13April 17, 1877.

§8. *Parol evidence, when admissible.*The written contract may be contradicted when fraud or mistake is alleged and proven. Or when the written contract is of doubtful meaning, it may be explained by parol evidence. [Roberts v. Short, 1 Tex. 373; Epperson v. Young, 8 Tex. 135; Mead v. Rutledge, 11 Tex. 50.]

Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54652-54653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Warheads and Energetics Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 16, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the National Warheads and 
Energetics Consortium (``NWEC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Cornerstone Research Group, Inc., Dayton, 
OH; Cyalume Technologies, Inc., West Springfield, MA; Fibertek, Inc., 
Herndon, VA; GG Greene Enterprises Inc., Warren, PA; Hittite Microwave 
Corporation,

[[Page 54653]]

Chelmsford, MA; Manufacturing Techniques, Inc., Kilmarnock, VA; QorTek, 
Inc., Williamsport, PA; Resodyn Acoustic Mixers, Butte, MT; Rockwell 
Collins, Cedar Rapids, IA; Sabre Consulting and Training, LLC, Wharton, 
NJ; and UTRON, Inc., Manassas, VA, have been added as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NWEC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 29, 2000, NWEC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 30, 
2000 (65 FR 40693).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 16, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on May 22, 2009 (74 FR 24035).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-22221 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 181 (Monday, September 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-552-801]


Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam: Correction of Date for the Extension of Time Limit for 
Preliminary Results of the Seventh Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES:  Effective Date: September 20, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Ray, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5403.

Correction of the Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    On August 9, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published in the Federal Register a notice of extension of time limit 
for preliminary results of the seventh antidumping duty new shipper 
reviews for certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam covering the period August 1, 2009, through February 15, 2010. 
See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New 
Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 74441 (August 9, 2010). The Federal Register 
notice incorrectly stated that the preliminary results are currently 
due on January 17, 2010. The correct due date for the preliminary 
results is actually January 17, 2011.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act.

     Dated: September 10, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-23351 Filed 9-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 10.2





 


CONSENT TO ACT
AS DIRECTOR 


 


I, Charles Andrew
McCartney, do hereby consent to be nominated for election as a director of Viatar CTC Solutions Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”) and agree to serve if elected as a director upon the effectiveness of the Company’s registration
statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 27, 2014 (the “Registration Statement”).
Further, I consent to being named as a director nominee in the Registration Statement.


 


DATED: October 16, 2014


 


	/s/ Charles Andrew McCartney	 
	Charles Andrew McCartney
#### Dan F. Price v. Simpson McCoy.

(No. 1695, Op. Book No. 3, p. 723.)

Appeal from Frio County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 181. *Tender; money must be paid into court.*When a party offers to pay a named amount in satisfaction of a debt, he need not count the money out and offer it to the creditor, when the creditor informs him that he will not accept the amount named in payment of the debt. But a party who pleads a tender must produce and pay into court at the time of the trial the amount tendered, or his plea will not avail him.

§ 182. *Attorney’s employment; statute of frauds.*If the proof showed an engagement of the plaintiff by the defendant to represent the defendant’s son as local counsel on the trial, and in preparing the case for trial, or if the defendant received and enjoyed the benefit of plaintiff’s services during the preparation of the case for trial, the plaintiff would be entitled either to compensation agreeably to the contract, or to the reasonable value of his services. The undertaking of the defendant, if he did employ the plaintiff, was the defendant’s own undertaking, and not an agreement to answer for the debt or default of another, and hence was not such a contract as *73was required to be in writing by tbe provisions of tbe statute of frauds.

Reversed and remanded.