alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMZN-2014.09.30.EX10.1




Exhibit 10.1
Conformed page to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2014, among Amazon.com, Inc., Bank of
America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto






respect of the most recent Revaluation Date) for the purchase of such Alternative Currency with Dollars.
“Alternative Currency Sublimit” means an amount equal to the lesser of the Aggregate Commitments and $1,000,000,000.  The Alternative Currency Sublimit is part of, and not in addition to, the Aggregate Commitments.
“Applicable Percentage” means with respect to any Lender at any time, the percentage (carried out to the ninth decimal place) of the Aggregate Commitments represented by such Lender’s Commitment at such time, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.13.  If the commitment of each Lender to make Loans has been terminated pursuant to Section 8.02 or if the Aggregate Commitments have expired, then the Applicable Percentage of each Lender shall be determined based on the Applicable Percentage of such Lender most recently in effect, giving effect to any subsequent assignments.  The initial Applicable Percentage of each Lender is set forth opposite the name of such Lender on Schedule 2.01 or in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which such Lender becomes a party hereto, as applicable.
“Applicable Rate” means, from time to time, the following percentages per annum, based upon the Debt Rating as set forth below:
	
					
	Applicable Rate

	Pricing Level
	Debt Ratings 
S&P/Moody’s
	Commitment Fee
	Eurocurrency Rate +
	Base 
Rate +

	1
	A+/A1 or better
	0.060%
	0.625%
	0.000%

	2
	A/A2
	0.080%
	0.750%
	0.000%

	3
	A-/A3 or worse
	0.100%
	1.000%
	0.000%






“Debt Rating” means, as of any date of determination, the rating as determined by either S&P or Moody’s of the Borrower’s non-credit-enhanced, senior unsecured long-term debt; provided that (a) if the respective Debt Ratings issued by the foregoing rating agencies differ by one level, then the Pricing Level for the higher of such Debt Ratings shall apply (with the Debt Rating for Pricing Level 1 being the highest and the Debt Rating for Pricing Level 3 being the lowest); (b) if there is a split in Debt Ratings of more than one level, the Debt Rating used to determine the Pricing Level shall be one Debt Rating level lower than the higher Debt Rating; (c) if the Borrower has only one Debt Rating, the Pricing Level of such Debt Rating shall apply; and (d) if the Borrower does not have any Debt Rating, Pricing Level 3 shall apply.
Initially, the Applicable Rate shall be determined based upon the Debt Rating specified in the certificate delivered pursuant to Section 4.01(a)(vi).  Thereafter, each change in the Applicable Rate resulting from a publicly announced change in the Debt Rating shall be effective during the period commencing on the date of the public announcement thereof and ending on the date immediately preceding the effective date of the next such change.
“Applicable Time” means, with respect to any borrowings and payments in any Alternative Currency, the local time in the place of settlement for such Alternative Currency as may be



2
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Aristocrat Group Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cindy Morrissey, Sole Director, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  November 14, 2012  /s/ Cindy MorrisseyCindy MorrisseySole Director and CEO(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2980 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify payment under 

the Medicare program for outpatient department procedures that utilize 

drugs as supplies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2014 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. BURR) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify 

payment under the Medicare program for outpatient department procedures that utilize drugs as supplies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Equal Access 

5 to Treatments Act of 2014’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2980 IS

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM FOR 

2 OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES 

3 THAT UTILIZE DRUGS AS SUPPLIES. 

4 Section 1833(t)(2)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(2)(G)) is amended by striking ‘‘shall’’ and 

6 all that follows and inserting the following: ‘‘shall— 

7 ‘‘(i) create additional groups of cov8 ered OPD services that classify separately 

9 those procedures that utilize contrast 

10 agents from those that do not; 

11 ‘‘(ii) create and implement, for serv12 ices furnished after the date of the enact13 ment of this clause and in a budget neutral 

14 manner, additional groups of covered OPD 

15 services that classify separately those pro16 cedures that utilize a drug (other than con17 trast agents and diagnostic radiopharma18 ceuticals) that both— 

19 ‘‘(I) has a cost above the drug 

20 packaging threshold; and 

21 ‘‘(II) functions as a supply when 

22 used in a diagnostic test or procedure; 

23 from those that do not; and’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE SUBMISSION OF THE ALLEGED RECALL PETITIONS ON DECEMBER 19, 1977 BY ANTHONY DI VINCENT.

February 28, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0633

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

NICHOLAS RYAN MCGUIRE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2023

09/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0633
#### I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. John L. Malone.

(No. 1303, R. Book No. *4,*p. 196.)

Appeal from Hays County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 232. *Petition; damages to land.*Where it appears from the petition that plaintiff’s claim for damages is based upon injuries done to his land by the railroad, the crops growing upon the land, and a system of drainage constructed and operated by plaintiff, were part of the land, and injuries to these would be injuries to the land itself.

§ 233. *Evidence of non-experts.*It was error to admit the testimony of non-experts as to the necessity for the erection of more culverts and sluices, and as to the character and location of same. Questions of science and skill should be elucidated by witnesses who, by their education and experience, are shown to be competent to judge of the matter. [Norman v. Wells, 17 Wend. 137; 1 Greenl. Ev. sec. 440, note 4.]

§ 234. *Boad-bed; culverts and sluices.*It is expressly provided by statute that “ in no case shall any railroad construct a road-bed without first constructing the necessary culverts or sluices, as the natural lay of the land requires, for the necessary drainage thereof. ” [Rev. Stats, art. 4171.] The duty thus required is imperative, and should damage occur from its non-performance, the rail*93road company would unquestionably be liable therefor to the extent of the injury; but the remedy afforded the injured party is a legal one of a suit for damages, which the law regards as adequate, and there can be no further resort to equity to compel the company to construct the necessary culverts and sluices of a kind, and at such places on its road, as the party injured may demand or a court may order.

November 24, 1882.

Eeversed and remanded.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 392 

To support and encourage the health and well-being of elementary school 

and secondary school students by enhancing school physical education 

and health education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To support and encourage the health and well-being of elementary school and secondary school students by enhancing school physical education and health education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Health as 

5 Youth Skills In Classrooms And Life Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTH EDUCATION AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION AS 

7 CORE ACADEMIC SUBJECTS. 

8 Section 9101(11) of the Elementary and Secondary 

9 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(11)) is amended 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 392 IS

1 by striking ‘‘and geography’’ and inserting ‘‘geography, 

2 physical education, and health education’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[No. 43613-9-I.

Division One.

May 15, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. J.J., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-8-03640-2, Michael J. Trickey and Patricia Hall Clark, JJ., entered October 21, 1998. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

Attn: Mortgage Backed Securities

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series 2011-C3

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and 

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EX-33.2


(logo) CoreLogic (R)




1 CoreLogic Dr.


Westlake, TX 76262




REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE




CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the “Asserting Party”), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2011, and for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). The servicing activities covered by this report include all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the commercial tax service provider (the “Platform”).




The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2011, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2011, and for the Reporting Period.




CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.




/s/ Vicki Chenault


Vicki Chenault,


Senior Vice President


February 8, 2012




Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.4

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



I, William H. Bethell, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Ballast, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 27, 2012

|/s/ William H. Bethell                     
|-------------------------------------------
|William H. Bethell, Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS J. MILANO.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied:
News United States Air Force
 DAF COVID-19 Statistics - July 2022Published Aug. 10, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Below are current **coronavirus disease 2019** statistics for Department of the Air Force personnel. July 12, 2022Current as of 2 p.m., July 11, 2022 **DAF TOTAL STATS****CASES*** **HOSPITALIZED** **RECOVERED*** **DEATHS***Military** 105,709 10 103,396 16Civilian 22,512 1 21,728 109Dependents 18,990 1 18,838 8Contractors 6,018 1 5,850 32**Total** **153,229** **13** **149,812** **165***These numbers include all of the cases that were reported since our last update on June 28.**Military includes Active and Reserve components.  **DAF TOTAL VACCINATED****ACTIVE DUTY** **GUARD** **RESERVE** **TOTAL FORCE**% Partially Vaccinated 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%% Fully Vaccinated 98.3% 94.1% 95.3% 97.1% **DAF APPROVED EXEMPTIONS****ACTIVE DUTY** **GUARD** **RESERVE** **TOTAL FORCE**Medical 286 193 145 624Administrative 22 712 83 817 **RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION REQUESTS****MAJCOM/FLDCOM** **DAF/APPEALS**Pending 2,847 575Approved 104 31Disapproved 6,803 3,685As of July 11, the Department of the Air Force has administratively separated 834 service members. *Civilian statistics are unaccounted for.**These numbers are subject to change. **Unvaccinated:**All those who have verbally refused, have not started the vaccination process or are erroneously coded. Does not include those who have approved exemptions. **Medical:** Medical exemptions are determined individually by the member’s medical provider. **Administrative:** Administrative exemptions are determined individually. For example, if a member obtained a commander-approved submission for separation or retirement by Nov. 1, they are administratively exempt. **Religious Accommodation:**Religious accommodations are a subset of administrative exemptions and are determined by the MAJCOM/FLDCOM commanders. The DAF has 30 business days (active component in CONUS) to process requests. Members who receive a denial of the accommodation request have five calendar days from the denial to 1) begin a COVID-19 vaccination regimen, 2) submit an appeal to the final appeal authority or 3) request to separate or retire. Appeals are determined by the DAF’s Surgeon General with inputs from the chaplain and staff judge advocate. Individuals do not have to get immunized as long as their request is in the process of being decided. Members who continue refusing to obey a lawful order to receive the COVID-19 vaccine after their accommodation request has been denied or retirement/separation has not been approved will be subject to initiation of administrative discharge proceedings. **Personnel Numbers (approximates):** 326,000 Active Component (U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force) 105,000 Air National Guard 66,000 Air Force Reserve 497,000 Total Force (Active Duty, Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve)COVID 



update 



COVID-19 



numbers 



metrics 



statistics
News United States Air Force
 Air University hosts AFITC Education and Training Event on multi-domain operationsPublished July 21, 2019
                        
                        By Phil Berube
                        
                        
                        Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                Senior Air Force leaders and notable industry experts headline the 2019 Air Force Information Technology and Cyberpower Education and Training Event, Aug. 26-28, in Montgomery, Alabama.
Hosted by Air University and themed “Cyberpower: Critical to Multi-Domain Operations,” the emphasis of this year’s AFITC will be on education and training in the realm of multi-domain command and control.
“As the home of Air Force professional military and continuing education, Air University, through this event, will be placing special emphasis on one of the chief of staff of the Air Force’s three focus areas: multi-domain operations,” said Col. David Bosko, AFITC director and cyber chair for Air University. “The quantity and speed of data flowing to the warfighter is growing at unbelievable rates. Learning how to harness this data and then making quick decisions on its potential across several different domains is critical if the Air Force is to win in a peer-to-peer conflict. ”
The event will highlight the importance of the continuing need for industry partners, decision makers, academia and government professionals to collaborate on joint ventures in the IT and cyber domains.
Among the senior military leaders speaking are Acting Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan; Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Stephen Wilson; Gen. James Holmes, commander of Air Combat Command; and Maj. Gen. Robert Skinner, 24th Air Force and Air Forces Cyber commander and Joint Force Headquarters-Cyber director.
Industry leaders delivering lectures include Sheila Jordan, senior vice president and chief information officer for Symantec; Andrew Moore, vice president of engineering for Google Cloud AI; and Jim Whitehurst, president and chief executive officer for Red Hat.
Through an aggressive schedule of cyber and IT breakouts, plenary sessions and panel discussions, attendees will gain insight and understanding of many aspects of Department of Defense and Air Force cyberspace and IT, including enterprise architecture, data transformation, agile development and emerging cyber threats.
More than 150 vendors have signed up for the conference, eager to demo cutting-edge IT and cyber software and hardware.
To register and learn more about the event, **visit www.afitc-event.com**.FS 



AF 



Air Force 



USAF 



2019 Air Force IT and Cyberpower 



Education and Training Event 



Montgomery 



Alabama 



AFITC 



multi-domain command and control 



MDC2 



education 



Air University 



information technology 



Maxwell AFB 



Air Force Base 



Air Education and Training Command 



AETC 



Department of Defense 



DOD
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6198]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ORDER OF PROCEDURE

  Mr. SIMPSON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I might 
proceed for 15 minutes as if in morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. SIMPSON. Mr. President, I thank the Chair.

                          ____________________
```
#### Thomas Booth v. J. I. Case & Co.

(No. 1515, Op. Book No. 2, p. 253.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

March 9, 1881.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1029. *Verdict against evidence; neiv trial.*In cases of conflicting evidence or the impeachment of witnesses, it is the peculiar duty and special province of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to the testimony of each witness, and the determination of the jury in such cases will rarely, if ever, be revised by an appellate court. If the verdict is sustained by the evidence, it will not be set aside because the court might or would have come to a different conclusion. In this case the defendants, who were sued upon a note given for a machine, pleaded a failure of consideration, — that the machine was worthless, etc. The testimony of five or six unimpeached and uncontradicted witnesses concurred in support of the defendants’ plea, but the jury found for the plaintiff. Held, that the verdict wras contrary to the evidence; that the jury were not warranted in arbitrarily disregarding the testimony •of these wdtnesses, and that a new trial should have been granted the defendants.

Reversed and remanded.