alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 A New WSINT: Win any fight nowPublished Nov. 30, 2020
                        
                        By 2nd Lt. Nicolle E. Mathison
                        
                        
                        57th Wing Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                While the U.S. Air Force Weapons School Integration, or WSINT, has not deviated much from its original training model, today’s training approach has taken a new form.WSINT is not only the capstone event students must pass to complete the **U.S. Air Force Weapons School** Weapons Instructor Course, but it is perhaps the most multi-faceted. WSINT generates capable leaders who can not only plan, integrate and dominate in any tactical setting but can also lead any spectrum of teams, who are ready to deliver strategic transformational change.WSINT’s focus has shifted from simulating conflict with fictitious countries to simulating conflict with great power competitors.In the past, instructors led student-devised oppositional forces during warfare exercises. But from Nov. 19 to Dec. 9, students will go head-to-head against one another simulating near-peer adversaries such as Russia and China, imbedding themselves in each other’s skirmishes. Instructors will rate and evaluate the engagements from the planning phases all the way to execution.“Weapons School Integration is the capstone event for our Weapons School students before they graduate,” said **Brig. Gen. Michael Drowley**, 57th Wing commander. “We still want to present to them challenging problem sets that force them to integrate, critically think and lead, but now we are trying to create an even stronger connection to the Great Power Competition, so they are armed and ready for any potential conflict or adversary.”The U.S. Air Force Weapons School’s mission is to train tactical experts and leaders to control and exploit air, space and cyber on behalf of the joint force. The mission of the 57th Wing is to train, instruct and lead the Air Force by ensuring it can win any conflict now.WSINT is an educational event that exposes students to a series of practical examinations. All examinations must be completed with a passing grade. The examinations test and refine each student’s ability to plan simulated conflict scenarios that will then be executed and evaluated immediately upon its completion.“We’ve learned over time that our adversaries model their training after our own tactics as executed in theater. So, if we are training to win, we must learn how to defeat ourselves. We are our greatest competition,” said Col. Jack Arthaud, U.S. Air Force Weapons School commandant.“Weapons School Integration prepares you for leadership and command in a number of ways,” Drowley said. “You’re presented with an incredibly challenging problem set. The only way to be successful is to harness the capabilities of your team and integrate them successfully.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



modernize 



WSINT 



Weapons School Integration 



nellis afb 



training 



great power competitors 



ACC 



Air Combat Command
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of FS Investment Corporation II



|                                               |  |                                        |          | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | -------- | 
|Name of Subsidiary                             |  | State of Incorporation or Organization |         
|Cobbs Creek LLC                                |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|Cooper River LLC                               |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|Darby Creek LLC                                |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|Del River LLC (formerly IC-II Investments LLC) |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|FSIC II Investments, Inc.                      |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|IC II American Energy Investments, Inc.        |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|Lehigh River LLC                               |  |                                        | Delaware | 
|Wissahickon Creek LLC                          |  |                                        | Delaware |
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF JOSE JONES.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied. (See 170 *N.J.Super.*478)
#### PHILIP MANDELBAUM v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sports Resorts International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory T. Strzynski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Gregory T. Strzynski


Gregory T. Strzynski
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2002
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES DAVIS.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Career Assistance Advisor renamed, recoded to synchronize responsibilities with resourcesPublished July 8, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                Beginning this fall, the Air Force’s 92 enlisted Career Assistance Advisors will be converted to Airmen Development Advisors, complete with a new corresponding Air Force specialty code and bolstered foundational support.
The change is designed to align the broad spectrum of CAA responsibilities with deliberate development of the enlisted force, as recently outlined in the **Enlisted Force Development Action Plan.**
The portfolio of daily CAA responsibilities includes guiding Airmen in making informed decisions about their military careers, such as career path counseling, reenlistments, retraining, and specialty job opportunities. They also advise commanders and supervisors on enlisted force management and professional development opportunities and manage the administration of key training programs such as the First Term Airmen Course.
Though these roles and responsibilities will not be altered as a result of the transition from CAA to ADA, the new AFSC will make ADAs part of the professional military education instructor community. This will align them with **Air Education and Training Command**’s **Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education**, allowing for a more cohesive level of baseline professional support.
“Right now, CAAs perform their duties without any formal training, standardized resources or instruction on how to build curriculum,” said Senior Master Sgt. Wes Lawrence, CAA special duty manager. “The change reinforces the importance of what Airmen Development Advisors will execute in their daily mission. We must provide tailored, professional resources and support that will benefit all Airmen.”
The transition exemplifies the “Force Development Ecosystem” focus area of the Enlisted Force Development Action Plan, which calls for building greater connections between initial skills, technical and on-the-job training, education and experiences.
"Connecting Airmen Development Advisors with the professional military education community makes sense as we strive for more deliberate development of tomorrow's enlisted force," said **Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass**.
ADAs will continue to support all mission partners, to include: active duty, Guard, and Reserve Airmen; **Guardians** and civilians. The change will be official once the Air Force Enlisted Classification document is published, which is scheduled for Oct. 31.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Career Assistance Advisor 



recode 



rename 



AFSC 



Air Force Specialty Code 



Airmen Development Advisor 



CAA 



Enlisted Force Development Action Plan 



Air Education and Training Command 



AETC 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dean W. Danner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Electronic
Tele-Communications, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Electronic
Tele-Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2003



/s/ Dean W. Danner
------------------
Dean W. Danner
President and
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual
Report of Mojo Data Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Spiteri, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
    2016, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.





|Date: September 6, 2018 | By: | /s/ Joseph Spiteri                                
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Joseph Spiteri                                    
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer, Mojo Data Solutions, Inc.

| |  | 
| |  |
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases staff sergeant/22E5 promotion cycle statisticsPublished Aug. 25, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kiana Pearson
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected9,706 senior airmen for promotion to staff sergeant, out of 45,991 eligible, for a selection rate of 21.1% in the 22E5 promotion cycle, which includes supplemental promotion opportunities.The average overall score for those selected was 372.45. Selectees’ average time in grade was 2.10 years and time in service was 4.57 years.
The promotion list is available on the**Enlisted Promotions**page of the Air Force’s Personnel Center website, the Air Force Portal andmyPers. Airmen can access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight application via the AFPC secure page.For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the**AFPC public website**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



staff sergeant 



promotion 



Cycle 



statistics
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 31 

To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 

discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Ms. AYOTTE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce 

permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 

5 Tax Freedom Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 

7 TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 

8 TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 

10 Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 31 IS

1 striking ‘‘taxes during the period beginning November 1, 

2 2003, and ending November 1, 2014:’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘taxes:’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2927 

To strengthen Inspector General audits and investigations by streamlining 

computer matching agreements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Mr. COBURN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To strengthen Inspector General audits and investigations 

by streamlining computer matching agreements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspectors General 

5 Streamlining Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPUTER MATCHING AGREEMENTS. 

7 Section 6 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 

8 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2927 IS

1 ‘‘(g)(1) In this subsection, the terms ‘agency’, 

2 ‘matching program’, and ‘record’ have the meanings given 

3 those terms in section 552a(a) of title 5, United States 

4 Code. 

5 ‘‘(2) In addition to the authority otherwise provided 

6 by this Act, each Inspector General, in conducting an 

7 audit, investigation, inspection, evaluation, or other review 

8 authorized under this Act, may compare any records with 

9 other records or non-Federal records. 

10 ‘‘(3) For purposes of section 552a of title 5, United 

11 States Code, or any other provision of law, a comparison 

12 of records with other records or non-Federal records per13 formed by an Inspector General or by an agency partici14 pating with an Inspector General under the authority de15 scribed in paragraph (2) shall not be considered a ‘match16 ing program’.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-34.4


(logo) plante moran




Plante & Moran, PLLC


Suite 2700


225 W. Washington St.


Chicago, IL 60606


Tel: 312.899.4460


Fax: 312.726.3262


plantemoran.com




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




To the Board of Directors


National Tax Search, LLC




We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC (the “Company”) complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.




Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December. 31, 2011 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.




/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC




Chicago,IL


January 16, 2012




(logo) Praxity


MEMBER


GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF


INDEPENDENT FIRMS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 305 

To authorize the acquisition of core battlefield land at Champion Hill, Port 

Gibson, and Raymond for addition to Vicksburg National Military Park. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the acquisition of core battlefield land at Champion Hill, Port Gibson, and Raymond for addition to 

Vicksburg National Military Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Champion Hill, Port 

5 Gibson, and Raymond Battlefields Addition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK. 

7 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte9 rior (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 305 IS

1 acquire the land or any interests in land within the 

2 area identified as ‘‘Modified Core Battlefield’’ for 

3 the Port Gibson Unit, the Champion Hill Unit, and 

4 the Raymond Unit as generally depicted on the map 

5 entitled ‘‘Vicksburg National Military Park—Pro6 posed Battlefield Additions’’, numbered 306/100986, 

7 and dated October 2010. 

8 (2) METHODS OF ACQUISITION.—Land may be 

9 acquired under paragraph (1) by donation, purchase 

10 with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, ex11 cept that land owned by the State of Mississippi or 

12 any political subdivisions of the State may be ac13 quired only by donation. 

14 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map described in 

15 subsection (a)(1) shall be on file and available for public 

16 inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 

17 Service. 

18 (c) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—On the acquisition of 

19 land by the Secretary under this Act— 

20 (1) the acquired land shall be added to Vicks21 burg National Military Park; 

22 (2) the boundary of the Vicksburg National 

23 Military Park shall be adjusted to reflect the acquisi24 tion of the land; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 305 IS

1 (3) the acquired land shall be administered as 

2 part of the Vicksburg National Military Park in ac3 cordance with applicable laws (including regula4 tions). 

5 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

6 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec7 essary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS