alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40057 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
SHANE JUDE ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-105-2

- - - - - - - - - - July 21, 1998 Before KING, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Shane Jude Romero appeals his sentence from his guilty-plea conviction for carjacking. He argues that the district court clearly erred in failing to reduce his offense level for acceptance of responsibility. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. We conclude that, in light of the standard of review which accords great deference to the sentencing court’s § 3E1.1 determination, no error ensued. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120-212

(5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Siebe , 58 F.3d 161, 163 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Watkins , 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). AFFIRMED.
[No. 23321-5-II.

Division Two.

May 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kelly M. Bischof, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 98-8-00019-2, William Knebes, J. Pro Tern., entered May 13, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Annual Report of NuZee, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2019 (the "Report"), the Company's Chief Financial Officer, Shanoop Kothari, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report, as amended by the Amendment, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report, as amended by the Amendment, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32



IVAX Corporation

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,

United
States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of IVAX Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 73 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6168]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Thomas, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 35.1














SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT













I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:






(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Investment Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 between Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.






(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.













Date: March 28, 2013






Entergy Louisiana, LLC, as servicer




By:   /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

a.m. (Eastern Time) September 20, 2010.

# PLACE: 

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# STATUS: 

All parts will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. Approval of the minutes of the August 16, 2010 Board Member Meeting

2. Thrift Savings Plan Activity Report by the Executive Director

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report

b. Monthly Investment Performance Review

c. Legislative Report

3. Annual Budget Reports

a. Fiscal Year 2010 Expenditures

b. Fiscal Year 2011 Budget

c. Fiscal Year 2012 Estimates

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: September 10, 2010.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-23003 Filed 9-10-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.a
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ Thomas F.X. BeusseThomas F.X. BeusseMay 8, 2008 *
    
    This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                                      $     798,799
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  24,365,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      421,829
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               25,851,290
<PP&E>                                                          2,048,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    945,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 40,225,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          23,144,057
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                            2,353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      2,806,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   40,225,594
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                6,429,532
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   5,100,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  305,634
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              1,748,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 1,023,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      358,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               665,357
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      665,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         .29




</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LESTER N. CASLOW.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 372

- C R



### ____________________

IN RE BRETT W. LIGON,

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brett W . Ligon, Montgomery County District Attorney, filed a petition for

writ of mandamus to compel the J udge of the 9th District Court of Montgom ery

County, Texas, to vacate the court’s discovery order signed on August 29, 2014.

We stayed the order pending the resolution of the mandamus proceeding and

requested a response form the real party in interest, Michael Burl Massen gill.

On September 8 , 2014, Relator filed a motion to dismiss this mandamus

proceeding as moot because the trial court has granted the State’s motion to set

aside the challenged discovery order. We dissolve our temporary order and grant2 the motion to dismiss. The original proceeding is dismissed wit hout reference to

the merits.

PETITION DISMISS ED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 23, 2014

Opinion Delivered September 24, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LLOYD G. JACKSON.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 34.1










ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH




SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES











REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Members


Entergy Louisiana, LLC


Baton Rouge, Louisiana





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of December 31, 2011, and for the period September 22, 2011 through December 31, 2011, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2011, and for the period September 22, 2011 through December 31, 2011 for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 29, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 289 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 289

   To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local 
Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2013

 Ms. Landrieu (for herself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 
                     Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local 
Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Real Estate and Economic 
Development Act of 2013'' or the ``CREED Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING UNDER THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS 
              LOAN PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 1122(b) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 
(15 U.S.C. 696 note) is repealed.
    (b) Restoration of Low-Interest Refinancing Provision.--
Subparagraph (C) of section 502(7) of the Small Business Investment Act 
of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(7)) (relating to refinancing not involving 
expansions), as in effect on September 25, 2012, shall be in effect 
during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and 
ending 5 years after that date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

** **

**DBUBS 2011-LC3**

InaccordancewithItem1123ofRegulationABandwiththerequirementsdetailedin§10.11ofthePoolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBSpool, CWCapitalAssetManagementLLC(“CWCAM”),initscapacityasSpecialServicer,isproviding thisOfficer’s Certificate with respect to thefollowing:

 

(A)             areviewofCWCAM’sactivitiesduringtheprecedingcalendaryearorportionthereof(the “ReportingPeriod”) and of CWCAM’s performance underthe Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervisionand;

 

(B)              that,tothebestofsuchofficer’sknowledge,basedonsuchreview,CWCAMhasfulfilled all its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

 

/s/James P. Shevlin 

JamesP. Shevlin  

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            NATIONAL SUPERSTARS, INC.
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Superstars, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Peter Porath, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
February 9, 2005
EX-34.1


(logo) pwc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Bank of America, National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assessment
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Compliance
Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB in connection with the asset-backed
securities transactions listed in Appendix B to the Compliance Statement,
involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that involved an offer or sale
of asset-backed securities that were required to be registered on or after
January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of the dates listed in Appendix B to
the Compliance Statement and for the periods then ended (the "Reporting
Period"), excluding the criteria which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform, as indicated in Appendix A to the Compliance Statement. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed securities transactions that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National
Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as
of and for the Reporting Period for the Platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 28, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 214 N. Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
T: (704) 344 7500, F: (704) 344 4100, www.pwc.com/us