alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2000
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




                                          /s/ MARK S. ZUCKER
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Mark S. Zucker
                                          Chairman of the Board of
                                          Directors


                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
[No. 44229-5-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. P.P., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-8-07554-8, Julie Spector, J., entered February 11, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### RICHARD GASIOR v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPT. OF CIVIL SERVICE, STATE AWARDS PROGRAM.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 154

*N. J. Super.*568).
Exhibit 33.12

ASSURANT

|                   |  |                                                                                                      
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Specialty
Property |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA
30339-2210 T 770.763.1000 F 770.859.4000
www.assurant.com

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2013 TO DECEMBER 31, 2013

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.

/s/ John Frobose

By: John
Frobose

President of American Security Insurance Company

and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and

Sr. Vice President
of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date: February 14, 2014
News United States Air Force
 First Air Force designated as air component to US Space CommandPublished March 11, 2021
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The U.S. Air Force has named**First Air Force** as the future air component to **U.S. Space Command**.Following this reorganization, First Air Force will continue to provide uninterrupted air component support to**North American Aerospace Defense Command** and **U.S. Northern Command** while also exercising command and control over Air Force forces supporting U.S. Space Command.“The U.S. Air Force is a critical contributor to the U.S. Space Command mission as evidenced by their support to Human Space Flight,” said U.S. Army**Gen. James Dickinson**, USSPACECOM commander. “We welcome First Air Force to our joint team.”First Air Force is responsible for ensuring the aerospace control and air defense of the continental United States, U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. Given the pivotal role space capabilities play in this critical mission.
“First Air Force was the natural choice to serve as Air Force component to U.S. Space Command,” said Air Force Chief of Staff**Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr****.** “In this new role, First Air Force will be better able to identify and address gaps and seams when integrating spacepower into the support of the homeland defense mission. This will also inform efforts to better fuse space operations into air operations centers around the globe.”Implementation is still in the early development phases as**Air Combat Command** plans how to organize, train, and equip First Air Force for this new role. The new air component is currently expected to achieve initial operating capability by the end of calendar year 2021.“It’s an honor for this command to be named as the Air Force’s component command to U.S. Space Command,” said**Lt. Gen. Kirk Pierce**, First Air Force commander. “We have a staff of seasoned professionals with decades of proven success in protecting the air domain in defense of the homeland. We look forward to supporting USSPACECOM in their efforts to defend against threats to the space domain.”More information will be released as it becomes available.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



1st Air Force 



U.S. Space Command 



NORAD 



USNORTHCOM 



Human Space Flight 



Gen. Dickinson 



aerospace 



Control 



air defense 



Gen. Brown Jr. 



CSAF 



component command 



modernization 



USSF 



ACC 



Air Combat Command
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 15, 2010By:/s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkChief Executive Officer
**                                                                                                                                                                   **Exhibit 32.1                                                   

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2013 of Bookedbyus Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Fred Person, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 29, 2013

/s/ *Fred Person*

Fred Person

President and Director

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.2


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT
TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made effective as of the 7th day of July, 2014, by and between
ERB PROPCO SAV LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Seller"), and SENTIO STAY LANDLORD, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company ("Buyer").


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Seller and
Buyer are parties to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated May 22, 2014, as amended by that certain First Amendment to
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 6, 2014 (as amended, the "Purchase and Sale Agreement"), pursuant to which
Seller agreed to sell, and Buyer agreed to purchase, certain real property located at 13801 East Yale Avenue, Aurora, Colorado,
as more particularly described in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, Seller and
Buyer desire to make certain amendments to the Purchase and Sale Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Seller and Buyer hereby agree as follows:


 


1.          Capitalized
Terms. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the
Purchase and Sale Agreement.


 


2.          Due
Diligence Period. The defined term "Due Diligence Period" in Section 1.1 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:


 


Due Diligence
Period: The period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on 6:00 P.M. Eastern Time on July 14, 2014.


 


3.          Force
and Effect. Except as hereby amended and modified, the Purchase and Sale Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms. To the extent any provisions contained herein conflict with the Purchase and Sale Agreement or any
other agreements between Seller and Buyer, then the provisions contained herein shall supersede such conflicting provisions contained
in the Purchase and Sale Agreement or other agreements.


 


4.          Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same instrument.
Delivery of signature by e-mail or facsimile shall be valid and binding.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Seller and Buyer have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first written above.


 


	 	BUYER:
	 	 
	 	SENTIO STAV LANDLORD, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ John Mark Ramsey
	 	Name: John Mark Ramsey
	 	Its:  Authorized Signatory
	 	 
	 	SELLER:
	 	 
	 	ERB PROPCO SAV LLC
	 	 
	 	By: ERB PROPCO HOLDCO I LLC
	 	Its: Sole Member
	 	 
	 	By: ERB SENIOR LIVING, L.L.C.
	 	Its: Sole Member
	 	 
	 	By: EVERGREENSLP, LLC
	 	Its: Manager
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brian E. Dowd
	 	Name: Brian E. Dowd
	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 377 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 377

To add the 9/11 Health and Compensation Programs to the list of exempt 
                         programs under PAYGO.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2013

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To add the 9/11 Health and Compensation Programs to the list of exempt 
                         programs under PAYGO.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Never Forget 9/11 Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO EXEMPT PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 255(g)(1)(B) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 905(g)(1)(B)) is 
amended by--
            (1) inserting after the item relating to Retirement Pay and 
        Medical Benefits for Commissioned Officers, Public Health 
        Service the following:
                    ``September 11th Victim Compensation Fund (15-0340-
                0-1-754).''; and
            (2) inserting after the item relating to the Voluntary 
        Separation Incentive Fund the following:
                    ``World Trade Center Health Program Fund (75-0946-
                0-1-551).''.
    (b) Fiscal Year 2014.--If the amendment made by subsection (a) 
takes effect after the date the President has issued the final 
sequester order for fiscal year 2014, the President shall revise the 
order to account for the amendment and issue a new order.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011      |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |   |   |   |
| /s/ Patrick White       |   |   |   |   |
| Patrick White           |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables
Trust 2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 24, 2015



| | By: | /s/ Min Sok Randy Park                                       
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Min Sok Randy Park                                     
| |     | Title: President and Secretary                               
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>

                                     Exhibit 27.1

                                FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the Balance
Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statement  of Cash  Flows and Notes  thereto
incorporated  in Part I,  Item 2 of this Form  10-QSB  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                  254,421
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        256,240
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          256,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   7,503
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                6,554
<OTHER-SE>                              189,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            256,240
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,696
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        7,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,304)
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.00



</TABLE>
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the
undersigned individuals, in his or her capacity as a director of WPX Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (WPX Energy), does hereby constitute and appoint each of James J. Bender and Stephen E. Brilz as his or her true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority to sign WPX Energys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and any and all amendments thereto or any and all instruments necessary or incidental in
connection therewith. Each said attorney-in-fact shall have full power of substitution, and each said attorney-in-fact shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of each of the undersigned, in any and all
capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in or about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as each of the undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said
attorney-in-fact.

This power of attorney has been duly executed below by the following persons as of the
20thday of February, 2012.



|                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Kimberly S. Bowers   |  |  |  | /s/ John A. Carrig   
|Kimberly S. Bowers       |  |  |  | John A. Carrig       
|                         |  | 
|/s/ William R. Granberry |  |  |  | /s/ Don J. Gunther   
|William R. Granberry     |  |  |  | Don J. Gunther       
|                         |  | 
|/s/ Robert K. Herdman    |  |  |  | /s/ Henry E. Lentz   
|Robert K. Herdman        |  |  |  | Henry E. Lentz       
|                         |  | 
|/s/ George A. Lorch      |  |  |  | /s/ William G. Lowrie
|George A. Lorch          |  |  |  | William G. Lowrie    
|                         |  | 
|/s/ David F. Work        |  |  |  |                      
|David F. Work            |  |  |  |
#### James R. Hines v. John Dean.

(No. 362, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 303.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 690. *Partnership debt; right of one partner to*sue, *as survivor, to recover upon, for his individual benefit.*Where a note is given to a firm of three partners, and one of them dies, and the second is insolvent and ceases to pay any attention to the affairs of the firm, and with*380draws from all connection with it, and the third partner is solvent and gives his active attention to the business of the firm, without any assignment or transfer from the second partner, the solvent partner does not become entitled to sue on the note in his own name and style himself surviving partner of the firm. It is a well settled general rule that all the partners must join in an action upon a contract made with the firm or to recover a debt due the firm (a dormant partner not privy to the contract need not be joined). Sandford was also a partner and payee of the note, and Hines was not required to litigate with Dean the question of his being the only solvent member of the firm, and one who, having paid the debts, thereby equitably acquired title to the assets. Defendant cannot know the equities between Dean and Sandford, or between Dean, Sandford and the executor of Randle, the deceased partner.

§ 691. *An adjustment is necessary to ascertain the individual interest of a partner.*-An adjustment of the accounts of a partnership is necessary to a determination of the rights of the partners in the property of the firm. The interest of a partner consists in his proportion of whatever balance may ultimately be left after payment of the partnership debts and settlement of account between the partners, and neither partner has any exclu1 sive right to any part of the joint effects for any sum due him until a balance of account be struck. [Parsons on Partnerships, 329, 331; Speake v. Prewitt, 6 Tex. 252; Carter v. Bradley, 58 Ill. 101.]

§ 692. *Bight of the maker who has executed a note to a partnership.*It is the right of a maker of a note to joint partners to have all the partners bound by the judgment; and if one or two surviving partners refuse to join in the action to recover a debt due the firm, he might be made a party defendant, and be thus concluded by the judgment.

§ 693. *Statute of*limitations,‘ *new suit.*Where the plaintiff, by amendment, sets forth the same cause of *381action more correctly or specifically than in his original petition, it is not a new suit, and the statute of limitations will not avail for the period between the orignal and amended petition.

March 23, 1878.

Reversed and remanded.