alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Chief of Staff visits Hill Air Force BasePublished March 4, 2021
                        
                        By 2nd Lt. Taylor Ferry
                        
                        
                        75th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr**. and his wife, Sharene, visited **Hill Air Force Base** March 2.
During his first visit to Hill AFB as CSAF, he met with Airmen and immersed himself with Hill AFB’s Ground Based Strategic Deterrent and **F-35 Lightning II** mission sets.
“Airmen are our most valuable resource, and the Airmen and their families at Hill (AFB) are no exception,” Brown said. “I’m grateful for the opportunity to hear from really talented Airmen, who are working hard on important areas of our national defense here like the F-35 and GBSD.”
A key stop on his visit was the GBSD Systems Directorate, which is responsible for modernizing and replacing **Minuteman III** flight systems, weapon system command and control, and launch systems, including missile silos, control centers and other ground infrastructure.
“Our nuclear weapons are a critical aspect of the strategic deterrence that safeguards our nation, and our allies and partners everyday” Brown said. “Modernization is a must to ensure that safety, security and reliability don’t erode and put our strategic deterrence at risk.”
In addition, Brown visited the **75th Air Base Wing**, Ogden Air Logistics Complex, **388th Fighter Wing**, **Reserve 419th Fighter Wing** and the Northrop Grumman Kemp Facility.
He was initially scheduled to visit Hill AFB for the first time last November, but the trip was postponed due to COVID-19 restrictions.
While the general met with leaders, Sharene had the chance to discuss quality-of-life issues with Hill AFB’s junior Airmen and spouses. She also visited with family readiness and other helping agencies to preview some of the resiliency programs available to Airmen, including the base’s all-abilities playground, the first one in the Department of Defense.
“This was a fantastic opportunity to host Gen. and Mrs. Brown in person to show them the amazing work being done by our Airmen across Team Hill,” said Col. Jenise Carroll, 75th Air Base Wing commander. “We look forward to their next visit so they can see how rapidly Hill is growing.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Chief of Staff 



Gen. Charles Q. Brown 



Jr. 



CSAF 



visit 



Hill AFB 



Ground Based Strategic Deterrent 



F-35 Lightning II 



75th Air Base Wing 



Ogden Air Logistics Complex 



388th Fighter Wing 



Reserve 419th Fighter Wing 



Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent Systems Directorate
[No. 24312-1-II.

Division Two.

April 28, 2000.]

#### Damon Mitten, *Appellant,*v. Rodney L. Jacques, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 97-2-11765-3, Frederick W Fleming, J., entered January 8, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Morgan, J.
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 30, 2014

No. 04-14-00177-CR

Alejandro Leal PENA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-090168-CRA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On October 2, 2014, this court abated this appeal to the trial court to hold a hearing to 

determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and 

whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The trial court 

conducted the hearing, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of 

fact and conclusions of law has been filed. The trial court determined that appellant desires to 

prosecute the appeal and is indigent. The trial court further determined that appointed counsel 

has not abandoned this appeal. The trial court concluded that “effective assistance of counsel will 

be best accomplished by continuing Mr. Shaughnessy as appellate counsel” and recommended 

that this court grant Mr. Shaughnessy an extension of time to file to November 15, 2014, to file 

appellant’s brief. 

On October 22, 2014, Mr. Shaughnessy filed a motion requesting an extension of time to 

November 15, 2014. On October 29, 2014, Mr. Shaughnessy filed appellant’s brief.

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is reinstated on the docket of this court. The 

motion for extension of time is MOOT.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of October, 2014.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Steven P. Wyandt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nitches, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended  May 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nitches, Inc.

|   | By:    | /s/ STEVEN P. WYANDT                                |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                     |   |
|   | Name:  | Steven P. Wyandt                                    |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual
Report of Mojo Data Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Spiteri, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
    2017, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2017, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.





|Date: September 6, 2018 | By: | /s/ Joseph Spiteri                                
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Joseph Spiteri                                    
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer, Mojo Data Solutions, Inc.

| |  | 
| |  |
[No. 18078-6-III.

Division Three.

April 18, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Julia Ann Schultz, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 98-1-00516-9, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered November 25, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, A.C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Schultheis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 273 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 273

  To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement 
  Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock 
                            ownership plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2013

 Ms. Ayotte (for herself, Mr. McConnell, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. Blunt) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement 
  Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock 
                            ownership plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIDUCIARY EXCLUSION.

    Section 3(21)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act 
of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(21)(A)) is amended by inserting ``and except to 
the extent a person is providing an appraisal or fairness opinion with 
respect to qualifying employer securities (as defined in section 
407(d)(5)) included in an employee stock ownership plan (as defined in 
section 407(d)(6)),'' after ``subparagraph (B),''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) FOR COMMERCE NATIONAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY DATED MARCH 31, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,149,131
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             6,750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,505,376
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      15,505,376
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,505,376
<LOANS>                                     97,641,639
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,070,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             131,478,501
<DEPOSITS>                                 112,838,485
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,172,234
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            441,296
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,179,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,772,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             131,478,501
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,264,095
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              242,255
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                61,283
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,567,633
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,051,246
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,122,465
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,445,168
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   62,253
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                920,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                462,009
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     462,009
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   293,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.048
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,125,103
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                86,778
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,848,053
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,013,081
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   41,600
<RECOVERIES>                                    36,781
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,070,515
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,070,515
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        694,723
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.46

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$17,310,000                                          May 9, 2000


     For value received, Paul B. Fireman (the "EXECUTIVE") promises to pay to
the order of Reebok International Ltd., a Massachusetts corporation (the
"COMPANY"), at 1895 J.W. Foster Boulevard, Canton, Massachusetts 02021, or such
other place as designated in writing by the holder hereof, the aggregate
principal sum of $17,310,000, together with all accrued but unpaid interest
thereon, on or before May 8, 2001. From the date hereof until the entire
principal amount of this promissory note has been paid in full, interest shall
accrue at a rate of 6.2% per annum, compounding annually, on the unpaid
principal amount outstanding from time to time, or (if less) at the highest rate
then permitted by applicable law.

     The indebtedness evidenced hereby may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at
any time without premium or penalty.

     The Executive, on behalf of himself and his assigns, hereby waives
diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand,
dishonor and non-payment of this Note, and expressly agrees that this Note, or
any payment hereunder, may be extended from time to time and that the holder
hereof may accept security for this Note or release security for this Note, all
without in any way affecting the liability of the Executive hereunder.

     This Note shall be governed by the internal laws, not the laws of
conflicts, of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.


                                        /s/ Paul Fireman
                                        --------------------------------
                                        PAUL B. FIREMAN
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSCOE CHAMBERS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

TIM LASKE; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 55946

D.C. No. 2:18

- cv

- 03470

- MWF

- KES

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Roscoe Chambers, a federal pri soner, appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dism issing his action alleging due process claims under the Federal Tort

Claims Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 42 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

. Barren v. Harrington , 152 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 55946

1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Chamber s ’s action because Chambers

failed to allege facts sufficient to state any cognizable claim for relief

. See Hebbe

v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are to be

liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to

state a pla usible claim for relief) ; Portman v. County of Santa Clara , 995 F.2d 898,

904 (9th Cir. 1993) (elements o f procedural due process claim).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.2


 




	
  

  	
  COMMON NEVRO
  CORP. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE
  FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 64157F 10 3 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of
  FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF NEVRO CORP.
  transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
  or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This
  certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer
  Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this
  certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized
  officers. Dated: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER & ASSISTANT SECRETARY CHIEF
  EXECUTIVE OFFICER & CHAIRMAN COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: WELLS FARGO
  BANK, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AMERICAN
  FINANCIAL PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS 

  






 


 










 




	
  

  	
  The Corporation
  shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement
  of the power, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional
  or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series
  thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such
  preferences and/or rights, if any. Such requests shall be made to the
  Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The
  following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
  certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
  according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common
  UTMA – ____________ Custodian ____________ (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as
  tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as joint
  tenants with right of survivorship Act ________________________________ and
  not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used
  though not in the above list. For value received _____ hereby sell, assign,
  and transfer unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING
  POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the
  within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney
  to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with
  full power of substitution in the premises. Dated ________________ NOTICE:
  THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
  UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
  ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST
  BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A
  PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”),
  THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE
  STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES
  BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the financial statements for Cambridge Advantaged Proper-
ties II Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by refer-
ence to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0000771996
<NAME> Cambridge Advantaged Properties II Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                     1

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                MAR-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   MAR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                           1,612,622
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,923,186
<PP&E>                           114,829,809
<DEPRECIATION>                   (49,050,442)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   73,227,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            17,912,753
<BONDS>                          89,507,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                       (34,192,622)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     73,227,679
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 13,376,240
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 10,508,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               5,573,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,705,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              0
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,683,305)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (372)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0



</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2918 

To designate Federal election day as a public holiday. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To designate Federal election day as a public holiday. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Democracy Day Act 

5 of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL ELECTION DAY AS A PUBLIC HOLIDAY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6103(a) of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after the matter re9 lating to Columbus Day, the following undesignated para10 graph: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2918 IS

1 ‘‘Federal Election Day, the Tuesday next after 

2 the first Monday in November in each even-num3 bered year.’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 241(b) of 

5 the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 20981(b)) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking paragraph (10); and 

8 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (11) through 

9 (19) as paragraphs (10) through (18), respectively. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS