alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### L. V. Lacroix v. D. J. Evans.

(No. 550, Op. Book No. 2, p. 260.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§ 749. *Trial by jury; right of, upon compliance with laxo, cannot be denied; waiver of, mere absence is not.*Upon compliance by a party to a civil action with the regulations prescribed by law, he is entitled to withdraw from the consideration of the court the issues of fact arising on the case, and to have them determined by a jury of the country. This right is guarantied him by the constitution, and cannot be defeated in the absence of unmistakable waiver. Mere absence from the court room of himself or his attorney, when the case is reached and called for trial, cannot, standing alone, be construed as such waiver, for this often happens through inadvertence, accident or misfortune, which ought not to work a forfeiture of jury trial. Upon the election of a party, and his compliance wit'h the law, the case is transferred from the docket, the cases upon which may be tried by the judge alone, to a separate docket kept exclusively for those cases upon which a jury must pass, and when the case is regularly reached, neither the judge nor the opposite party have authority to dispense with a jury without the assent of the party originally demanding it. The trial may proceed without delay, but it must be in the mode prescribed by law, after the election of the other party, and his absence cannot affect the procedure. *412The reasons which may prompt him to demand a jury lie within his own bosom, and may apply to the case as well in his absence as in his presence, for aught the court may know. Having paid for the privilege, it cannot be denied him. It being made to appear in this case, by bill of exception, that this cause was tried by the judge below without a jury, after a jury had been demanded by the appellant and the fee therefor paid into court, the judgment is reversed.

March 17, 1880.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1  Section 1350 Certification   STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned is the CEO and President of ONLINE-REDEFINED, INC.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ONLINE-REDEFINED, INC. for the year ended December 31, 2011.   The undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ONLINE-REDEFINED, INC. as of December 31, 2011.   This Certification is executed as of May 2, 2012.   /s/ Dan Faiman Dan Faiman CEO and President
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                     |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: August 5, 2010 | By: /s/ Kyle Gotshalk  
|                     | Kyle Gotshalk          
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 304th Rescue Squadron supports Mount Hood search, rescuePublished March 14, 2022
                        
                        By 920th Rescue Wing Public Affairs
                        
                        
                        920th Rescue Wing
                **PORTLAND, Ore. (AFNS) --**
                An 11-member **Guardian Angel** team from the **304th Rescue Squadron** battled high winds and deep snow to assist with the rescue efforts of two injured climbers on Mount Hood March 7.
A multi-team search-and-rescue mission was conducted in challenging conditions after two climbers fell approximately 200 feet in the Leuthold Couloir area.
The **Air Force Rescue Coordination Center** received a request from the Clackamas County Sherriff’s office for the 304th RQS to assist with ground recovery in coordination with the **Oregon Army Air National Guard** and **U.S. Army Reserve**. Rescuers faced deep snow and other rough conditions including avalanche conditions with winds blowing between 50-70 mph.
“We had the entire squadron training in Portland when the call came in, so we had the best qualified and experienced Airmen ready for this search and rescue mission,” said the 304th RQS team lead. “Our special mission personnel have the high altitude, cold weather and medical training we perform daily that prepared us to assist.”
All pararescue Airmen are nationally certified paramedics. They participate in mountain and industrial rescue courses with a focus on learning to rig systems to safely handle rescue loads, personnel and equipment.
“Austere environments are where PJs are trained to operate,” said a pararescueman assisting with the recovery. “High altitude, jungle, desert; we train for every scenario possible, but in the end, it is all about getting help to those who need it.”
Under the **Defense Support for Civilian Authorities** guidelines, United States military assets and personnel, in specific circumstances, can be used to assist civil authorities during emergencies and other specific events when a situation requires the skill set a military unit has, such as in this case with the pararescue team.
The 304th RQS is part of the **943rd Rescue Group** at **Davis-Monthan Air Force Base**, Arizona, a geographically separated unit within the **920th Rescue Wing** at **Patrick Space Force Base**, Florida.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



943rd Rescue Group 



920th Rescue Wing 



reserves 



304th Rescue Squadron 



Air Force Rescue Coordination Center 



search and rescue 



Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 



patrick space force base 



pararescueman 



PJs 



Air Combat Command 



ACC 



Guardian Angel 



Mount Hood
ex101.htm










 





 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 




  





5











  









 


 


 


 




  





6
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

            RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC. ANNOUNCES REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, JANUARY 13, 1999 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) today announced that its Board of Directors has approved a
one-for-three reverse stock split of the Company's common stock. The reverse
stock split is expected to become effective in late February.

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading provider and manager of education and
treatment services for at-risk and troubled youth. The Company, through its
youth care division, operates and manages residential treatment facilities,
group homes and service contracts in 8 states and Puerto Rico. Ramsay's
educational division manages Charter/Contract Schools serving over 500 students
in five counties throughout the State of Florida.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities Exchange Commission for additional information.

Contact:   Isa Diaz
           Vice President Corporate Relations
           (305) 569-4626
EX-10.6.2



 Exhibit 10.6(2) 

DIREXION SHARES ETF TRUST II 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CUSTODY AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, dated as of July 7, 2014, to the Custody Agreement dated as of January 28, 2014, as amended
March 31, 2014 (the “Agreement”), is entered into by and among DIREXION SHARES ETF TRUST II, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Trust”), DIREXION ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (the “Sponsor”) and U.S. BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (the “Custodian”). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into the Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the preamble of the Agreement to delete the listing of each series under the Trust; and 

WHEREAS, Article XV, Section 15.02 of the Agreement allows for its amendment by a written instrument executed by all parties. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that Exhibit A is hereby deleted from the Agreement and the first paragraph of the Agreement is
hereby superseded and replaced as follows: 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this 28th day of January, 2014, by and among DIREXION SHARES ETF TRUST II, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Trust”) acting for and on behalf of each series as are currently authorized and
issued by the Trust or may be authorized and issued by the Trust subsequent to the date of this Agreement (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”), DIREXION ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, the sponsor of the Funds
(“Sponsor”) and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America (the “Custodian”). 

Except to the extent amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer on one or more
counterparts as of the day and year first written above. 
  

									
	DIREXION SHARES ETF TRUST II	 		 	U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick Rudnick
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Michael R. McVoy

	Name: Patrick Rudnick	 		 	Name: Michael R. McVoy
	Title: Chief Financial Officer	 		 	Title: Senior Vice President

 (signatures continued on the following page) 

  

					
	7/2014 – Direxion Shares ETF Trust II	  	1	  	










			
	DIREXION ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick Rudnick

	Name: Patrick Rudnick
	Title: Chief Financial Officer


  

					
	7/2014 – Direxion Shares ETF Trust II	  	2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4957]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            LEAVE OF ABSENCE

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to:
  Mrs. Collins of Illinois (at the request of Mr. Gephardt), on May 15 
and 16, on account of personal business.

                          ____________________
```
#### Mack & Co. v. H. James.

(No. 940, Op. Book No. 2, p. 637.)

Error from Harrison County.

December 11, 1880.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 547. *Attachment sued out upon a debt not due.*A creditor, under the laws in force when these proceedings’ wrere had, was not required to wait the maturity of his ’ debt before suing out an attachment to secure him in its payment. But final judgment could not be rendered until the maturity of the debt. [Pas. Dig. art. 154.] The affidavit for attachment was sufficient. [Pas. Dig. art. 142, subd. 7.] An amended petition was filed after the debt became due. The judgment of the county court’ sustaining the motion to quash was error.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patrick Gosselin hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of B-Maven, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2016 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of B-Maven, Inc.  Dated: October 13, 2016/s/ Patrick GosselinPatrick GosselinPresident, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)PureSnax International, Inc.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to B-Maven, Inc. and will be retained by B-Maven, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 Morgan Stanley Capital IInc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention:  StephenHolmes

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, and Midland Loan Services, A Divisionof PNC Bank, NA, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, asTrustee, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, and  WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Certificate Administrator,Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-C3 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 10.38

                     AMENDMENT TO SECOND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

      THIS AMENDMENT TO SECOND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), is dated
as of July 31, 2003 and amends the Second Exchange Agreement, dated as April 22,
2003, entered into by and among Diomed Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
with headquarters located at One Dundee Park, Andover, MA 01810 (the "Company"),
Diomed, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company ("Diomed"), each entity named on the signature page hereto as a Note
Purchaser (each, a "Note Purchaser") and Gibralt US, Inc., a Colorado
corporation (the "Designated Note Purchaser"). Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have their respective meanings set forth in the Second
Exchange Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

      In consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Second Exchange
Agreement as follows:

      1. Clause (ii) of Section 1(b) of the Second Exchange Agreement is hereby
amended by deleting the phase "July 31, 2003" therein and inserting in lieu of
such phrase "November 15, 2003."

      2. Clause (i) of Section 4(d) of the Second Exchange Agreement is hereby
amended by deleting the phase "July 31, 2003" therein and inserting in lieu of
such phrase "November 15, 2003."

      3. All other terms and conditions of the Second Exchange Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

                            [Signature page follows.]

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the Note
Purchasers, Diomed and the Company as of the date set forth above.

                                        COMPANY:

                                        Diomed Holdings, Inc.

                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                        Name:  James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                        DIOMED:

                                        Diomed, Inc.

                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                        Name:  James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                        LENDER

                                        Gibralt US, Inc.

                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                        Name:  Johnny Ciampi
                                        Title: Authorized Person
#### J. G. Whitlow v. R. R. Moore.

(No. 1512, Op. Book No. 2, p. 289.)

Appeal from Parker County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1052. *Verdict; manner of receiving.*The jury returned their verdict to the judge at his residence, and not in open court. This occurred in the night, and he excused one of the jurors from being present at court next morning. On the lygxt morning, five of the jurors being present in- open court, the verdict was read by the clerk *590and assented to by the jurors present, and the judge told the parties that if either of them desired the absent juror to be present, he would have him sent for, but neither party requested this to be done. The manner in which the verdict was returned and received was excepted to by the appellant. *Held:*There can be but little doubt that the objection to the verdict is fatal to its validity. Rev. Stats., arts. 1322 and 1325, direct the manner of receiving the verdict of the jury, and the proceedings to be had thereon. It must be returned in open court by the jury. It must be read to them in open court, and inquiry made of them whether it is their verdict, and either party has the right to “poll the jury.” A verdict delivered to the judge at his private residence is not a compliance with these requirements of the law. It is not a proceeding conducted in open court and in the face of the public. How much of the requirements of the statute may be considered as merely directory, and such as may be waived, it is not necessary to consider, for in this case the parties consented to nothing. So, though the dispersal of the jury, after the delivery of the verdict to the judge, might not be fatal to the validity of their verdict, but could be cured if they afterwards appeared in open court and returned their verdict there, yet that was not done in this case. In truth, thex’e was no verdict rendered ixx opsxx court by the jury. But five men of those impaneled appeared, axxd these did not constitute a jury. The offer of the county judge to the parties that, if they x-equested it, he would send for the absent juror, did not require of them acceptance or rejection. It was axx offer he had a right to make, and no-power to exiforce the acceptance óf. He had excused the juror from attendance. What process could he issue to bring him back, and how punish him if he failed to obey his request? To tolerate such a loose and irregular procedure in x-espect to trial by jury, while seriously interfering with the conduct of business ixi the coxxrts, would jeopardize the rights of parties, and destroy the respect *591and confidence which ought to attend the trial by jury and the administration of justice. [19 Ind. 126; 6 Minn. 239.]

February 23, 1881.

§ 1053. *Verdict; affidavits of jurors to impeach.*The practice of permitting jurors to make affidavit of facts which transpired in the jury room, and to state how they made up their verdict, in order to show that their verdict was erroneous and ought to be set aside, is wholly irregular, and such practice cannot be too severely reprobated.

Reversed and remanded.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3352

_____________________________

RUSSELL TIMOTHY GASKIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Bruce Anderson, Judge.

July 26, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Greg Caracci, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
News United States Air Force
 FYSA: Agility PrimePublished Nov. 8, 2021
                        
                        By Angel Orozco and Tech Sgt. Deana Heitzman
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                FYSA: Agility Prime. For your situational awareness, flying cars are real and the Air Force is helping to rapidly get them in the air. Our guest, AFWERX director Col. Nathan Diller, prefers to call these flying cars eVTOLs, or electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing vehicles. We’ll defer to his expertise. Plug in and join us for more insight on Agility Prime, the revolutionary initiative that partners the military with eVTOL industry leaders to accelerate the development of this amazing new technology.



(U.S. Air Force Graphic)



If audio does not start, it is not supported in your browser. Click here to listen to the podcast on DVIDS.

Related links:**- Agility Prime: The Third Revolution in Aerospace****- AFWERX Agility Prime announces “flying car” military airworthiness, infrastructure milestones****- Air Force awards first airworthiness approval for human flight in electric aircraft program****- AFWERX Agility Prime partners with Kitty Hawk in first medevac exercise with electric aircraft**podcast 



AFTV 



AFwerX 



Agility Prime 



innovation 



eVTOL 



flying cars