alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 BLUE: The AI AdvantagePublished June 22, 2020
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force aims to harness and wield the most optimal forms of artificial intelligence to accomplish all mission-sets of the service with greater speed and accuracy. One way to accomplish this effort is by embedding innovative Airmen of all ranks and backgrounds into academia and industry across the nation.





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.artificial intelligence 



AI 



OODA Loop 



OODALOOP 



OODA 



drive innovation 



AFBlue 



USAF 



acquisition 



Drive Inn 



Command & Control 



Multi Domain Operations 



Air Force Materiel Command 



MIT AF Tech Accelerator 



AITech Accelerator 



AFwerX 



Air Force Television 



DIU 



KesselRun 



Kessel Run 



Faster/Smarter 



contracts
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IVAX
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             269,703
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      135,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21,451
<INVENTORY>                                        172,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   591,113
<PP&E>                                             384,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                     158,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     943,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              206,841
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15,838
<OTHER-SE>                                         451,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       943,278
<SALES>                                            322,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   366,543
<CGS>                                              185,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      185,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     64,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6,186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 57,979
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (2,254)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        55,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .34



</TABLE>
** **

Exhibit 34.3** **

** **

**Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Boardof Directors

Citibank,N.A.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank,N.A. (or “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by American Honda Finance Corporation issued on or after January1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), whichthe Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelvemonths ended March 31, 2012. With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relatesto remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended March 31,2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

May 25, 2012
VI 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 449 

For the relief of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and Kristjan 

Dodaj. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2013 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, 

and Kristjan Dodaj. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Anton Dodaj, 

7 Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and Kristjan Dodaj shall 

8 be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, and re9 mained in, the United States, and shall be eligible for ad10 justment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 449 IS

1 for permanent residence under section 245 of the Immi2 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing 

3 an application for such adjustment of status. 

4 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub5 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust6 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

7 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

9 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Anton 

10 Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and Kristjan Dodaj 

11 the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 

12 reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal 

13 year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

14 available to natives of the country of the birth of Anton 

15 Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and Kristjan Dodaj 

16 under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nation17 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# 2023 Air Force Learning Professionals’ Consortium call for topics now open

              - Published  Aug. 18, 2022
              -                             By Larisa Langley                                                    

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **
The call for topics for the 2023 Learning Professionals’ Consortium has been released by **Air Education and Training Command’s**Learning Professionals Branch.  The theme of the 2023 event is, “Imagine – Create – Innovate,” with a focus on development of the community of knowledgeable and committed learning professionals.  “As planning gets underway for the virtual event scheduled for March 22-23, 2023, it’s important that potential presenters have time to develop quality submissions,” said Dr. Angela Canada, AETC’s Learning Professionals’ and **Force Development Credentialing Division** chief. “In past years we have had presenters from not only the Department of the Air Force, but sister services, academia and industry as well. Our attendees expect high-caliber sessions.”  Learning professionals are those personnel who analyze, design, develop, deliver, support, administer, manage, or evaluate education and training. The Learning Professionals’ Consortium gives attendees an opportunity to learn best practices, hear successful collaboration stories, and gain solutions to learning issues. The two-day event will feature keynote speakers, presentations, panels, and discussion forums, focusing on topics relevant to learning professionals.  Those interested in presenting at the LPC-23 can submit their topic **here**. Topics should support development of the learning professionals’ community. Presenters are welcome to submit more than one topic. Topic submission forms are due no later than Sept. 30.  “We are excited to continue to offer the opportunity to enhance learning development for the women and men we serve,” said Col. Shelly Mendieta, deputy director for Force Development for AETC’s Operations and Communications Directorate. “Through this virtual conference, we offer the ability for anyone who supports or works in a learning environment to interact, collaborate, and grow, no matter where their physical location.”  The Learning Professionals’ Consortium is designed for learning professionals across the Air Force to meet, interact, and ultimately collaborate on innovations that will enhance learning and development. The division’s goal is to build a community of learning professionals who work together to accelerate the transformation of the military learning paradigm.  For more information on Air Force Learning Professionals, visit their **website** or **Facebook page**.  

FSUSAFAFAir ForceLearning Professionals’ ConsortiumLPC-23AETCAir Education and Training CommandLearning Professionals Brancheducationcollaborationdevelopmenttraining
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Scott Keys, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ SCOTT KEYSScott KeysExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
 Date: April 27, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at

Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:01-cr-00221-M-1; 

5:20-cv-00436-M) 

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael Antrantrino Lee, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6097 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Michael Antrantrino Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lee has not made the 

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6097 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000-LXSITRST0000]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Wisconsin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management-Eastern 
States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: 
Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin

T. 34 N., R 16 E.

    The plat of survey represents the survey of the North and South 
center line of Section 16, in Township 30 North, Range 16 East, of 
the Fourth Principal Meridian, in the State of Wisconsin, and was 
accepted August 5, 2010.

    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against the survey, as shown on the plat, 
prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: September 2, 2010.
Dominica Van Koten,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 2010-22454 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
News United States Air Force
 Rated Preparatory Program now accepting applications for FY21 Fall classPublished April 16, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Active duty Air Force officers and enlisted personnel interested in becoming rated officers have until May 25 to apply for the Fall 2021 Rated Preparatory Program.
As the program continues to expand, the fall class will partner and train with the **Civil Air Patrol** wing in Columbus, Indiana.
“We recently completed the third iteration of RPP, with 40 officers and 20 enlisted personnel in attendance,” said Maj. Sean Stumpf, Aircrew Task Force branch chief. “The inclusion of enlisted personnel in the program marked a significant milestone and helps cast a wide net to attract the best the Air Force has to offer and is another step toward expanding the program. We plan to continue to grow in FY22 and FY23, ultimately peaking at 240 students per year.”
Officers who complete the program are required to apply to the next available Undergraduate Flying Training selection board. Enlisted participants are required to apply to at least one of the three Air Force commissioning sources: **U.S. Air Force Academy**, Reserve Officer Training Corps or Officer Training School.
Applicants selected for RPP will first complete a self-paced, online ground course followed by a one-week, in-resident course to introduce them to aviation fundamentals. Program participants will garner approximately seven to 10 flight hours, ground instruction and additional training time in a **Federal Aviation Administration**-approved flight simulator.
“The Rated Preparatory Program is a unique opportunity for officers and enlisted,” said Col. John O’Dell, Aircrew Task Force deputy director. “For anyone who is considering pursuing a career as a rated officer, and wants to gain basic aviation skills to become more competitive, RPP can make a significant difference. The experiences gained in RPP will help members compete at Undergraduate Flying Training boards.”
Senior Airman Dell Fonda, radar airfield and weather systems technician, who recently participated in the Spring 2021 class agreed.
“The opportunity to participate in this program reaffirmed my desire to be a rated officer and what I need to do to achieve it,” Fonda said. “The Rated Preparatory Program has been intense but has given me the insight on how to prepare a successful OTS package, as well as what to expect in Undergraduate Pilot Training if I get selected to be a pilot.”
Interested applicants can find additional information on how to apply through PSDM 21-31 on the MyPers **website**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Rated Preparatory Program 



FY21 



CAP 



Civil Air Patrol 



RPP 



ROTC 



OTS 



applications 



inclusion 



rated officer 



One Air Force
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 23

- 1839

_____________________________
T IMOTHY G. M ALONE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. December 7, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Timothy G. Malone, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda Uwaibi, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEPHEN S. ZIEGLER.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 43375-0-I.

Division One.

April 3, 2000.]

#### Tahir Bawazir, *Appellant,*v. The Boeing Company, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-14646-0, Jim Bates, J., entered August 28, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J, concurred in by Grosse and Kennedy, JJ.
#### ROSLYN WITT v. COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE CO.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 48th FW conducts ACE exercisePublished Jan. 17, 2021
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jessi Monte
                        
                        
                        RAF Lakenheath Public Affairs
                **RAF LAKENHEATH, United Kingdom (AFNS) --**
                The 492nd Fighter Squadron completed a three-day Agile Combat Employment exercise at **RAF Lakenheath**, Jan. 13.
Four **F-15E Strike Eagles** and a 14-Airmen maintenance team with limited support equipment participated in a simulated deployment to a forward-operating base on the north side of the RAF Lakenheath airfield. Airmen and aircrew underwent cross-discipline training, learning new skill sets from their peers in other career fields.
“We had a subject matter expert from each career field, and we were all learning and executing each other's duties,” said Capt. David Spieker, 492nd Fighter Squadron F-15E pilot. “It helps everyone gain an appreciation of each other's jobs and makes cooperation more successful in the future.”
The ACE concept aims to develop Airmen who are adept in disciplines outside of their normal day-to-day duties. Exercises like this contribute to the evolution of a force of multi-capable Airmen and aircrew, improving mission readiness and increasing capabilities in less than optimal environments.
As part of the training to accomplish the mission at a forward-operating base, two of the aircraft landed at RAF Leuchars Airfield, Scotland, Jan. 11 for refueling.
“The visit of two 48th Fighter Wing F-15’s was a great example of a well-planned and proficiently executed mission,” said Squadron Leader Barry Flynn, Leuchars Diversion Airfield officer commanding. “The USAF planners did an exceptional job of keeping Leuchars informed of requirements and timings, which ensured a smooth-running operation. This visit is hopefully the first step of a friendship between the 48th Fighter Wing and Leuchars Airfield.”
Agile Combat Employment reduces the personnel footprint required to deploy forces on short-notice or no-notice operations, ensuring RAF Lakenheath Airmen and aircrews are postured to respond across the spectrum of military operations. Utilizing these concepts improves mobility and interoperability with partners and allies, and ensures **U.S. Air Forces in Europe** are ready to deliver combat airpower when called upon.L/R 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



USAFE 



USAFE-AFAFRICA 



RAF Lakenheath 



48th FW 



readiness 



training 



Ace 



Agile Combat Employment 



F-15E
[No. 23671-1-II.

Division Two.

May 19, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Charles Ray Kinkaid, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 97-1-02194-8, Gary Tabor, J., entered August 14, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.