alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Exercise Southern Beach, ROTC Enlisted Instructors, Humanitarian AssistancePublished Nov. 12, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force highlights Airmen from Kadena and Yokota Air Bases working with the Japan Air Self-Defense Force during exercise Southern Beach, new assignments are available for enlisted cadre with Air Force Reserve Officer Training units, and Travis Air Force Base Airmen train and deliver humanitarian aid to the Dominican Republic. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Britt Crolley)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Southern Beach boosts lethality, strengthens partnerships****- Air Force opens enlisted DSD assignments at AFROTC detachments****- Airmen train while delivering humanitarian aid to Dominican Republic**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                        5,715,200
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 2,113,509
<ALLOWANCES>                  516,124
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        54,712,905
<DEPRECIATION>                13,095,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                53,211,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,582,886
<BONDS>                       51,000,000
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    1,214,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  53,211,489
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              9,370,131
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,336,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,672,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3,038,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  1,199,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 259.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                 259.58
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Latest OCP guidance OKs current subdued patchesPublished Dec. 19, 2018
                        
                        By Senior Master Sgt. Andrew Biscoe
                        
                        
                        439th Airlift Wing
                **WESTOVER AIR RESERVE BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --**
                Latest Operational Camouflage Pattern uniform guidance OKs current subdued patches Airmen wearing OCP uniforms are authorized to add their former Battle Dress Uniform subdued patches until the mandatory brown subdued ones go into effect. Highlights from Air Force Instruction 36-2903, which will be mandatory wear April 1, 2021: The U.S. flag patch is mandatory and will be subdued using the spice brown color criteria (cloth) centered at the top of velcro and worn while in–garrison and deployed. 
Notes: 
Current subdued black and green (cloth) U.S. flags may be worn until June 1, 2020, then spice brown will be the only accepted version. Infra-red U.S. flags are not authorized. -- The higher headquarters patch is mandatory and will be subdued using the spice brown color criteria (cloth) centered under the U.S. flag patch.
  
Current subdued version of HHQ patch may be worn until the patch color conversion has been completed or until April 1, 2021, whichever is sooner. -- right sleeve. A maximum of two patches may be worn.Air Force 



AF 



guidance 



Battle Dress Uniform 



BDU 



operational camouflage pattern uniform 



OCP
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10517

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

UBALDO RABAGO-VAZQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-388-1-P

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ubaldo Rabago-Vazquez appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. RabagoVazquez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the

aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

that should have been alleged in his indictment and included in

the factual basis of his guilty plea. Rabago-Vazquez maintains
No. 02-10517

-2-

that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be

imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Rabago-Vazquez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

In lieu of filing an appellee’s brief, the Government has

filed a motion asking this court to dismiss this appeal or, in

the alternative, to summarily affirm the district court’s

judgment. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. The

motion for a summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government need

not file an appellee’s brief. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY

AFFIRMANCE GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 28, 2010, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. A permit was issued on September 9, 2010 to: Sam 
Feola, Permit No. 2011-008.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-22925 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF l’EXA8 AUSTIN CRQVCR SLLLIRI rtyr*rrGc;L”K‘ Honorabls

Ton F. C01eJnan,

Jr. CountyAttorney Angelbla

oolmty Lorkln.Texas Dear Sir:
. Attantfonr F&r. E. 2-J. Cenn

on

aem .'.-.- ; ,l

and 89useB&U. No. 20, Aots OS 1927, Fortieth L@sbtWs, pas*-32J+,

Obapter220 any law or parts of laws to the oontrary

notwitbetandin&" -A31 laws arA parts of lawa in oonfliot htm&wlth

ead rsqulring

the Asm@ssora-Oolleotors OS the mrioua oountiem of the~pltbate to oollaot Stats oooumtion taxes letiedby Artiule

7047, RerlasdCivil Statutea qf Texas of 1925, aud lieu80 BillNo. 514, Aste of 1931, FortyWeoond h&Sl6tWe, page 447, Ch6pter 367, and Eouao gillNo. 20, hota of 1927, Forthth Legislature, we 324, CLurptes

220, are hereby ; exprommly

repealed.
. . .*

. .
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 12, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1396 Lower Tribunal No. F16-9295

________________ 

### Elisha Baxter, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge. Elisha Baxter, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

Order 

February 24, 2017

155227-8 

DORICE M. BOYD,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155227

COA: 333414

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE Wayne CC: 15-011731-CZ

INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff- Appellee,

v

ORLANDO PEAY,

Third Party Defendant-Appellant,

v

STATE TREASURER,

Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

STATE TREASURER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155228

COA: 333415

ORLANDO PEAY, Wayne CC: 15-013864-CZ

Defendant-Appellant,

and

DORICE M. BOYD and AMERICAN EQUITY

INVESTMENT LIFE INSURANCE CO.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________/
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 24, 2017

2

Clerk

 On order of the Chief Justice, third party defendant-appellant having failed to pay 

the partial filing fee as required by the order of February 1, 2017, the Clerk of the Court 

is hereby directed to close this file.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 6974** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RICHARD DWAYNE ALLISON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the West ern District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. Glen M. Williams , Senior District Judge. ( 1:04

- cr - 00093

- gmw - pms - 1 )

Submitted : July 27, 2010 Decided: August 10 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curia m opinion
. Richard Dwayne Allison, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Dwayne Allison appeal s the district court ’ s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Allison , No. 1:04

- cr - 00093

- gmw - pms - 1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2009) . We deny the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LYNN TILTON, §

§ No. 161, 2017

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below—Court of Chancery of

§ the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 12946

ZOHAR II 2005–1, LIMITED and §

ZOHAR III, LIMITED, §

§

Plaintiffs Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: April 18, 2017

Decided: April 19, 2017

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 19

th day of April 2017, having considered the appellant’s notice and 

supplemental notice of appeal from interlocutory order and related motions for stay 

and to expedite, and the appellees’ motion to strike, it appears to the Court that:

(1) In a pending action filed under 8 Del. C. §§ 225 and 221, the 

defendant-appellant, Lynn Tilton, has petitioned this Court, under Supreme Court 

Rule 42, to accept an interlocutory appeal and to stay the proceedings in the Court 

of Chancery. The interlocutory order on appeal is an April 4, 2017 bench ruling 

that denied Tilton’s motion to sever or stay certain equity ownership issues from 
2

the issues to be tried in the summary proceeding. Tilton contends that the issues 

are complex and beyond the bounds of such a proceeding. 

(2) The plaintiffs-appellees filed an opposition to Tilton’s application for 

certification and for a stay of the proceeding. By order dated April 17, 2017 and 

docketed on April 18, 2017, the Court of Chancery denied Tilton's application for 

certification and motion for stay. 

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 

discretion of the Court1and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.2 In this 

case, the Court agrees with the Court of Chancery’s denial of Tilton’s application 

for certification of an interlocutory appeal. The principles and criteria of Rule 42 

do not weigh in favor of interlocutory review of the April 4 bench ruling denying 

Tilton’s motion to stay or sever.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory 

appeal is REFUSED. The motion to stay and motion to strike are moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

 

1 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).

2

Id. (b)(i)–(iii).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERICK ANDRE NUNN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4007

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 13, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Thomas P. 

Barber, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public 

Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: New Deadline for RPP, EOD Training, Recruiting VR GamePublished Dec. 3, 2021
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Garrett Hess
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force has details on the extended deadline for Airmen to apply to the Rated Preparatory Program, which helps with qualification for aviator positions; Explosive ordnance disposal experts train with multinational forces on handling dangerous situations; and what started as a commercial has become a hit virtual reality game for Air Force Recruiting. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Update: Airmen interested in learning aviation fundamentals, becoming rated officer can apply for Rated Prep Program until Dec. 31****- ASAB EOD Host Multi-National FTX****- How an Air Force Recruiting commercial became a popular VR game**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the nine month period ended  September 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         453
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               435
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       469,203
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,565)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   435
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 
PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                   932,482
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            363,290  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               74,827  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,367,752
<PP&E>                                11,990,755 
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,825,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         9,687,419 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    537,608
<BONDS>                                  765,575
<COMMON>                                   7,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                  818
<OTHER-SE>                             8,375,912 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           9,687,419
<SALES>                                1,296,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,326,959
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            498,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,360,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (60,860)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (532,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (532,981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (532,981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
#### SHELTON COLLEGE v. CITY OF CAPE MAY.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Population Sciences Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         November 8-9, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6898,                         *wallsc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 10, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23155 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P