alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 366 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to require the 

Bureau of Land Management to provide a claimant of a small miner 

waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after 

written receipt of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 

to require the Bureau of Land Management to provide 

a claimant of a small miner waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after written receipt 

of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay 

the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 366 IS

1 SECTION 1. SMALL MINER WAIVERS TO CLAIM MAINTE2 NANCE FEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10101(d)(3) of the Omni4 bus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 

5 28f(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘for any reason, the 

6 claimant shall have a period of 60 days after receipt of 

7 written notification of the defect or defects by the Bureau 

8 of Land Management to:’’ and inserting ‘‘for any reason 

9 (including the failure to timely file a small miner’s mainte10 nance fee waiver application or an affidavit of annual labor 

11 associated with the application and required application 

12 fees), the claimant shall have a period of 60 days after 

13 receipt of written notification of the 1 or more defects pro14 vided by the Bureau of Land Management by registered 

15 mail to’’. 

16 (b) TRANSITION RULES.—The claimholder of claims 

17 numbered AA023149, AA023163, AA047913, AA047914, 

18 AA047915, AA047916, AA047917, AA047918, and 

19 AA047919 (as of December 29, 2004) shall be consid20 ered— 

21 (1) to have received a first half final certificate 

22 for application AA072648 (associated with the 

23 claims) before September 30, 1994; and 

24 (2) to qualify for relief under section 

25 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation 

26 Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 28f(d)(3)) and have the opVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:44 Feb 27, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S366.IS S366

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 366 IS

1 portunity to cure under that section for any prior 

2 period for which 1 or more defects existed or there 

3 was a failure to pay claim maintenance fees. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2884 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit tax-exempt status 

to professional sports leagues that promote the use of the term redskins. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mr. REID, and Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

tax-exempt status to professional sports leagues that promote the use of the term redskins. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL 

4 SPORTS LEAGUES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (s) as sub8 section (t), and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2884 IS

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (r) the fol2 lowing new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(s) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL

4 SPORTS LEAGUES.—No professional sports league shall be 

5 treated as described in subsection (c)(6) if such profes6 sional sports league promotes, or allows a member club 

7 or franchise connected with such professional sports 

8 league to promote, the use of the term ‘redskins’ in con9 nection with any team or club connected with such profes10 sional sports league.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>


              NATIONAL DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      EXHIBIT 27 - Financial Statement Data


     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  MARCH  31,  1999  AND  UNAUDITED
STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH  31,  1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                  257,700 
<SECURITIES>                            0       
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,607  
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        260,470
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          260,470     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   5,620     
<BONDS>                                 0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0       
<PREFERRED>                             0       
<COMMON>                                6,554        
<OTHER-SE>                              189,546     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            260,470
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,174
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        4,879   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,705)     
<INCOME-TAX>                            0       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,705)            
<DISCONTINUED>                          0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0       
<CHANGES>                               0       
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,705)            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0       
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0       
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

Cogo Group, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statement (No. 333-164699) on Form S-8 of Cogo Group, Inc. of our reports dated April 2, 2012, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cogo Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries(collectively, the “Group”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements ofincome and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended December 31, 2011 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,which reports appear in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 20-F of Cogo Group, Inc. and to the reference to ourfirm under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in the annual report.

 

Our report dated April 2, 2012 on theconsolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Group completed the redomesticationmerger of the Company, a Cayman Islands corporation, and Cogo Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“CogoMaryland”) and the Company’s predecessor, on August 4, 2011. The consolidated financial position, results ofoperations and cash flows for all periods presented prior to August 4, 2011 relate to those of Cogo Maryland.

 

/s/ **KPMG**

 

Hong Kong, China

April 2, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE EXIDE
ELECTRONICS GROUP, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


       
<CAPTION>


<S>                                     <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2775
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                137613
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                  105073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             270714
<PP&E>                                        49472
<DEPRECIATION>                                44874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               506441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        152432
<BONDS>                                      220678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                   18739
<COMMON>                                        104
<OTHER-SE>                                    93768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 506441
<SALES>                                      328310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             417518
<CGS>                                        290212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                390296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            20656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6807
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3342
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2376
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.15
        


</TABLE>
I, CATHY S. LUSK, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals

District of the State of Texas, do hereby certify that Pither Plumbing Co., Inc., Plaintiff in the

trial court secured an extension of thirty-one (31) days in which to file Appellee’s Brief in the

following numbered and entitled cause:

American Idol, General, LP d/b/a The REO, and Randy Hanson a/k/a Randall Hanson

No. 12-14-00134-CV vs.

Pither Plumbing Co., Inc.

This certificate is made pursuant to Tex. Rev. Civ. State. Ann. art. 5069, 1.05 sec. 3(c)

(Vernon Supp. 1985) to assist the Clerk of the Trial Court in calculating the amount of postjudgment interest accrued.

WITNESS MY HAND and seal of said Court at Tyler, Texas, this 10th day of July 2015

,

A.D.

Respectfully yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

______________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 15.2



LOGO

HAN KUN LAW OFFICES

Suite 906, Office Tower C1, Oriental Plaza, 1 East Chang An Avenue, Beijing 100738, P. R. China

TEL: (86 10) 8525 5500; FAX: (86 10) 8525 5511 / 8525 5522

March 26, 2014

500.COM LIMITED

500.com Building

Shenxianling Sports Center

Longgang District

Shenzhen, 518115

Peoples Republic of China

Ladies and Gentlemen,

We consent to the reference to our firm name and the summary of our opinion under the headings Risk Factors in 500.COM LIMITEDs Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 26, 2014 (the Annual Report). We also consent to the filing with the SEC of this
consent letter as an exhibit to the Annual Reports.

In providing these consents, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the Rules and Regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Han Kun Law Offices

Han Kun Law Offices





CONFIDENTIALITY.This document contains
confidential information which may also be privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not copy, use, or distribute it. If you have received it in error, please advise Han Kun Law Offices
immediately by telephone or facsimile and return it promptly by mail. Thanks.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4554]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            FIXING MEDICARE

  (Mr. GOSS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. GOSS. Mr. Speaker, it takes guts to do what is right instead of 
just doing what is popular. President Clinton's own Medicare Board of 
Trustees, which includes Cabinet Secretaries Donna Shalala, Robert 
Rubin, and Robert Reich, believe that under current law, Medicare will 
be bankrupt by the year 2002, or possibly even earlier. These are the 
President's people telling us. Doing nothing is disaster; doing nothing 
is a formula for bankruptcy. But what solutions have the Clinton 
Democrats proposed to correct this problem? None. I hear rhetoric 
today, but I do not hear solutions.
  Mr. Speaker, the Clinton Democrats are showing a willingness to let 
the system collapse by maintaining the status quo. On the other hand, 
the Republican majority will rise to the challenge of trying to show 
some guts and offer some real solutions to preserve, to protect and to 
improve Medicare. The Republican majority is committed to honor our 
contract with older Americans. I know I am one, and I represent a lot 
of others.
  Mr. Speaker, it is real simple. The program is going broke, and we 
are going to fix it because we care about senior citizens. We want them 
to have good quality, affordable health care options, and we know doing 
nothing is disaster, so we are going to do something.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                  1,697
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             545
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,244
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      22
<BONDS>                                   233
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                              4,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            4,642
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          139
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (127)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (127)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (4.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (4.36)


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTIAGO ABISAI ALVAREZBARRIOS; et al., 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73584 

Agency Nos. A202-002-083 

A202-002-084 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Santiago Abisai Alvarez-Barrios and his minor son, natives and citizens of 

Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order 

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

application for asylum, and denying Alvarez-Barrios’s application for withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73584 

of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 

2014). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that petitioners

failed to establish that the harm they experienced or fear was or would be on 

account of a protected ground. See Ayala v. Holder, 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 

2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant 

must show that “persecution was or will be on account of his membership in such 

group”); Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s 

“desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random 

violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”); Sagaydak v.

Gonzales, 405 F.3d 1035, 1042 (9th Cir. 2005) (“To establish a nexus to the

political opinion ground, the [petitioners] must show (1) that [they] had either an

affirmative or imputed political opinion, and (2) that they were targeted on account

of that opinion.”). Thus, petitioners’ asylum and Alvarez-Barrios’s withholding of 

removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Alvarez-Barrios failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. 
3 16-73584 

See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LUIS GONZALEZ.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AFWERX to host JADC2 demo event for government users, tech scouts

              - Published  June 5, 2020
              - AFWERX Public Affairs

**LAS VEGAS (AFNS)  --  **
**AFWERX** is scheduled to host a digital Joint All-Domain Command and Control prototyping demonstration event during the weeks of June 15 and 22.

 

The event, stemming from the aforenamed “Multi-Domain Operations Challenge,” will bring together 24 of the 30 invited companies with Air Force and government tech scouts, end users, contracting officers and leadership.

 

“Following this extensive market-research process, we’re excited to be presenting this opportunity for defense stakeholders to discover top-tier, fully vetted solution providers that may meet their mission needs,” said Mark Rowland, AFWERX Las Vegas lead. “Ensuring the interoperability of every element of the (Defense Department’s) operations is crucial, and we’re excited to be playing a part in making that happen.”

 

To tackle **Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Stephen W. Wilson’s** MDO priority, AFWERX initially hosted a problem-definition workshop on the topic in April 2019, which attracted more than 130 participants from across the DoD, allied forces, the private sector and academia. 

 

The workshop led to an AFWERX Challenge, which advertised a defined problem statement globally and resulted in a record 317 solutions submitted.

 

Following a review by 80 DoD subject matter experts, 102 were selected to attend the MDO Showcase at AFWERX Fusion 2019 in Las Vegas, where the top 30 teams were announced to proceed to the next phase: the demonstration event.

 

The event will be broken up over two weeks on Monday, Wednesday and Friday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. Pacific Standard Time with three-hour sessions per team and one hour for each presentation.

 

Technology categories for the selected solutions include:
            - Access to disparate data sources, application programming interfaces and integration    
            - Prepare, analyze and validate information    
            - Data visualization/presentation, decision support and artificial intelligence/machine learning/software enabled automation    
            - Real time communication, multi-level security, data caching and storage    
            - Complete MDO Solution

Government personnel can register until June 15 and schedules will be distributed to registered attendees via email: **https://www.eventbrite.com/e/jadc2-virtual-demonstration-event-tickets-105303545740**

USAFAFAir ForceinnovationAFwerXJADC2Joint All-Domain Command and Controlprototypingdemonstrationmulti-domain operationsAir Force vice chief of staffGen. Steven WilsonMDOinteroperabilityFS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                MEDICARE

  (Ms. VELAZQUEZ asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I rise to take strong exception to the 
Republicans' proposed massive Medicare and Medicaid cuts. These cuts 
will hurt the most vulnerable of Americans, our children, our seniors, 
the poor and the disabled.
  Large reductions in Medicare payments will mean increased out-of-
pocket costs for seniors. On average seniors will have to come up with 
another $3,000 for medical expenses once the Republican plan goes into 
full effect.
  The Republican plan also puts the squeeze on urban and rural health 
centers, institutions that rely heavily upon Medicare reimbursement.
  The end result would be hospital closures and declining health among 
poor and working families. Why are they cutting this program? In order 
to fund corporate welfare programs and tax cuts for the 1 percent of 
the families who control 40 percent of the assets in this country. That 
is right, for the wealthiest Americans.
  Let us stop this charade and consider real health care reform.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 18449-8-III.

Division Three.

March 23, 2000.]

#### Arlene Wiggins, *Respondent,*v. The Okanogan School District, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Okanogan County, No. 98-2-00100-5, Jack Burchard, J., entered April 19, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Sweeney and Kato, JJ.