alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 18484-6-III.

Division Three.

May 11, 2000.]

#### Don Groat, et al., *Appellants,*v. Baker Boyer Bancorp, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 98-2-00159-4, Robert Leigh Zagelow, J., entered May 3, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Schultheis, J.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
USG1, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Kimi Royer, CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|March 30, 2012 |  | /s/ Kimi Royer  
|-------------- |  | ----------------
|               |  | Name: Kimi Royer
|               |  | Title: CEO
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LUIS A. SANTANA.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 44521-9-I.

Division One.

May 8, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Beau Currier, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-00355-3, Anthony E Wartnik, J., entered May 26, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  May 9, 2005                   By:  ________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

                                          /s/ MARK S. ZUCKER
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Mark S. Zucker
                                          Chairman of the Board of
                                          Directors


                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, John J. Patrick, Chief Executive Officer and President of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), certify in my capacity as an officer of the Company that I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) and that to the best of their knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2012

/s/ John J. PatrickJohn J. Patrick, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 12 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a separate disclosure.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ALONZO DORSEY, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 255 MAL 2012 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 8th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
News United States Air Force
 F.E. Warren AFB defenders take on Crow Creek ChallengePublished Sept. 12, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Nicole Reed
                        
                        
                        90th Missile Wing
                **F. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, Wyo. (AFNS) --**
                The sun rises over hilly fields casting warm rays on groups of Airmen gearing up to start their ruck march. Camelbaks slosh as team leaders remind everyone to hydrate in preparation for the competition.
The 90th Security Forces Group find themselves at the beginning of their annual Crow Creek Challenge, Sept. 6, at F. E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming. Over the course of the day, defenders would challenge themselves and each other, competing through physically strenuous and mentally-tasking obstacles.
The individual obstacles include fireman and litter carries, calisthenic exercises while wearing gas masks, a Humvee push, mock improvised explosive device searches and several more physical challenges.
“Each of the 14 stations (comprises) events that are exclusive to defenders and the mission we do. The knowledge and skill-set among the members will vary based on experience,” said Tech. Sgt. Heather Griffin, 90th Security Forces Group plans and programs noncommissioned officer in charge. “We have subject matter experts who run the stations and determine the difficulty (and) severity of the agility drill being conducted.”
F.E. Warren AFB members began the competition with high expectations, giving each other high fives and filling the air with excitement prior to the start of their first station.
“Our team is pretty strong and we are definitely the best out here,” said Staff Sgt. Jesse Koritar, 90th Ground Combat Training Squadron instructor.
Friendly competition between security forces squadrons is not the only intended outcome of the Crow Creek Challenge. Reflection, remembrance and honor given toward fallen defenders are frequently emphasized with each step taken.
At the beginning of each station, team leaders called everyone to gather around. All present fell silent as a tribute was read about one of their fallen brothers or sisters.
“Tech. Sgt. Joseph Lemm was killed Dec. 21, 2015, when a suicide bomber rammed an explosive-laden motorcycle into a joint patrol with Afghan security forces outside of Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan,” Staff Sgt. Kerrya Jones, 890th Security Forces Squadron security controller, read to his team members at the 13th obstacle.
The small group listened respectfully before jumping into the challenge dedicated to Lemm and the other Airmen who sacrificed their lives for their country.
The teams were ranked based on the best times and completion of each obstacle of the challenge.
As the event came to a close, competitors and onlookers cheered as the 90th Security Forces Squadron was announced as the winner of the Crow Creek Challenge.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



FE Warren AFB 



defenders 



security forces 



training 



ruck march 



Crow Creek Challenge 



90th Missile Wing
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4447]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  THE PEOPLE WANT WASHINGTON TO CHANGE

  (Mr. BALLENGER asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, last month I went back to my district and 
returned to a place far different from Washington. In my district, 
there are families who work hard and play by the rules. And, they are 
careful not to spend more than they take in. If they do not, they run 
afoul of the law.
  In Washington, however, things are different.
  In Washington, it's OK to waste other people's money.
  In Washington, it's OK to spend lavishly on ineffective programs.
  In Washington, it's OK to disrespect the values that ordinary 
Americans live by every day.
  When I returned home over the recess, I listened to my constituents. 
I can tell you one thing, Mr. Speaker, they want Washington to change. 
They want a government that will respect simple virtues, not one that 
creates deficits and debts to be passed on to our children and 
grandchildren.
  Mr. Speaker, in the first 100 days, we Republicans proved that 
promises can be made and kept. In the next, we will show that 
Washington truly can be changed.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND THE NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                             0000771934
<NAME>                 Atlantic Gulf Communities Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000
<CURRENCY>                                               USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                                 2,542
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          7,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          125,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0
<PP&E>                                                12,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1,739)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       148,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0
<BONDS>                                              130,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 81,145
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               1,281
<OTHER-SE>                                          (104,131)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         148,546
<SALES>                                               29,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      35,541
<CGS>                                                 26,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         33,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       8,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     4,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (10,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (10,118)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (1.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (1.81)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven P. Wyandt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nitches, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended May 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nitches, Inc.

|Date: July 23, 2007        
|---------------------------
|                           
|/s/ Steven P. Wyandt       
|                           
|Steven P. Wyandt           
|Chief Executive Officer and
|Chief Financial Officer    

This certification is furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Nitches, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in to any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Nitches, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
EX-34.3
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2011 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland Loan Services complied with
the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2011 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2012


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-10-027]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

September 20, 2010 at 1 p.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-125 (Third Review) (Potassium Permanganate from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 30, 2010.)

5. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1082 and 1083 (Review)(Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China and Spain)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 30, 2010.)

6. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 10, 2010.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 2010-23055 Filed 9-10-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2921 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2921

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, 
     as the ``Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2014

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, 
     as the ``Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE A. EVANS VA COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in 
Galesburg, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``Lane A. 
Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community 
based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``Lane A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient 
Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
1

 The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1546

___________

Sharon K. Boothe, *

*

 Plaintiff - Appellant, *

*

* Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western 

* District of Arkansas.

v. *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner *

of Social Security Administration, *

*

 Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 18, 2009

Filed: January 15, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BENTON, Circuit Judge, and VIKEN,1

 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2

 The Honorable James M. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas, sitting with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

Sharon K. Boothe appeals the district court’s2

 order affirming the denial of

disability insurance benefits for the period from July 15, 2000 until December 31,

2002. See Boothe v. Astrue, No. 08-5007, 2009 WL 117565 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 16,

2009). Having conducted a de novo review of the relevant record and considered

Boothe’s arguments for reversal, see Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 838, 841-42 (8th

Cir. 2009) (standard of review), the court agrees with the district court that substantial

evidence in the whole record supports the administrative law judge’s decision, and no

error of law appears. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________
[No. 17430-1-III.

Division Three.

April 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lawrence Raymond Senesac, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 97-1-00546-0, Richard J. Schroeder, J., entered March 31, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Kato, JJ.