alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 CSAF releases Action Orders to Accelerate Change Across Air ForcePublished Dec. 10, 2020
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr.** released the *CSAF Action Orders to Accelerate Change Across the Air Force* Dec. 4. In August, Brown released his strategic approach entitled**Accelerate Change or Lose**, in which he described his view of the strategic landscape as Air Force chief of staff and, from that, his emphasis on why change is necessary. The newly-released action orders now represent his call to Airmen to move forward aggressively in the push toward change; the “what” to the first document’s “why.”The document outlines four Action Orders:

**Action Order A: Airmen**describes a people-first approach. This means identifying attributes of Airmen the Air Force needs and reviewing personnel and talent management systems to meet the identified needs.

**Action Order B: Bureaucracy** says the Air Force needs to speed up its decision-making process. Changing design processes will improve effectiveness and efficiency, allowing more space for innovation.

**Action Order C: Competition** explains that Airmen need to understand their role in the long-term strategic power competitions between the U.S., Russia and China. The Air Force must improve its understanding of competitors’ ambitions and ways of war to inform how it organizes, trains and equips Airmen.

**Action Order D: Design** Implementation says the Air Force needs to know how to adapt to changes. The service must be ready for future budget constraints by developing an affordable, analytically defensible and Congressionally-supported force structure.

While the Action Orders provide the “what,” the “how” represents the answers to these problems, according to the document. Airmen will provide these answers, cutting through bureaucracy with global competition in mind, to reshape the design of the future.

View the full document at******https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/csaf/CSAF_Action_Orders_Letter_to_the_Force.pdf
*Editor's note:** The Action Orders have been **updated** as of Feb. 18, 2022. Visit **here** to view the revised document.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



CSAF 



Air Force Chief of Staff 



Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. 



Accelerate Change or Lose 



Action Orders to Accelerate Change Across the Air Force
[No. 16385-7-III.

Division Three.

May 2, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Nathan J. Kerr, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Chelan County, No. 96-1-00305-1, Carol A. Wardell, J., entered January 8, 1997. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kato, J., and Munson, J. Pro Tern.
News United States Air Force
 F-22 crashes on Eglin AFB rangePublished May 15, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                An **F-22 Raptor** assigned to the 43rd Fighter Squadron, and part of the 325th Fighter Wing currently based at **Eglin Air Force Base**, crashed at approximately 9:15 a.m. May 15. The location of the crash was approximately 12 miles northeast of Eglin AFB’s main base on the test and training range.
The pilot ejected safely from the aircraft and was transported to the 96th Medical Group hospital on Eglin AFB for evaluation and observation. He was listed in stable condition. The name of the pilot has not been released.
There were no other individuals in the aircraft. There was no loss of life or civilian property damage related to the crash.
First responders from the 96th Test Wing are on the scene. The crash site has been secured.
The mission was a routine training flight with the 33rd Fighter Wing. A board of officers will investigate the crash.
For more information, please contact the Eglin AFB public affairs office at 850-882-3931.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Eglin AFB 



F-22 



Raptor 



crash 



325th Fighter Wing 



96th Medical Group 



43rd Fighter Squadron 



AETC 



Air Education and Training Command 



Tyndall AFB 



LR
This document contains some pages that are ofpoor quality at the time of imaging.



### 7 7&L JTT^^i

T^,'C CLcfe^ 

### RECEIVED IN COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS FEB 06 2015 

# ^Ll^$-az *&P,JsZ:' ^/r "*?*))&$;J A^g»*/ CAST/ll* £ ^k^T JAsz^T c'tf*& I*J/ft-$•'/: 7&»ff-@J~ 0<^*b, *JM (PflOC f£as* fa 

### ff$£-C4fM$S'ft -**•/.' 

### $-sj Jti€ fjy* .9 *•- ZtA&vGM :\?®tty._T•/£.i.j?,f#' /% f/^/t ^tsy/f JfJlj /!• c % ff?y ., of•'-? 'f?1? i 

### @ij. 7Af ,Cf/;>s .,^)f@j~ .-o St &<*/'* vSr&f *xj e&^X 

### ,^/f ^A*€" p&^k/zf ^A(^£f",^'U^/T^''^/%^^r^ s?£ 

### fAj^f^/Wy ^6'^/V j&'^r . ajfljy £>/?/?st& &dJ

frl£t'i & f^0^b UjW" €>r^ L&^S SJAtJ /IfZ%vStST;J r -/- ^s af% A ft/£ rj£



### '~?'Af? ftA?4>u7*'&t ^ s**U?s/ ' <fc2 jj> T' ~Tj? jJ3 ' s 4 4~
-^llJ T'hS • flin^l CA f£Q^ p. -VtWT 

### c&mj fj7 &7fh **^Lys 

## $}fiT$ AH/fs/ .jrf/jw^<y J 9m 1Z .^ry-t&n £\>?y /'/\p/c LA ^ 

## -/i^^ffiv/ t^s-f'/iio^ C/J%k7f •JTK\h,;ft* u»*%*7 17¥f^Zf7Xx>Jr

>7
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AETC commander talks developing leaders at AFA '21

              - Published  Sept. 25, 2021
              -                             By Capt. Allison Kirk and C. Blanes Arce                                                    
              - Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs

**NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. (AFNS) --  **
**Lt. Gen. Brad Webb**, commander of **Air Education and Training Command**, spoke at the Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference, sharing his personal perspective on developing the next generation of Airmen and Guardians, Sept. 22 in National Harbor.As the AETC commander, Webb is dual-hatted as the force development commander for the Air Force and focused on a competency-based approach to developing the Airmen and Guardians the services need.The difference between the United States Air Force and its adversaries, Webb emphasized, is the trust placed in Airmen and noncommissioned officers, empowering them to adapt in an environment of strategic competition.“You can’t draw a picture of a multi-capable Airman, but it’s an Airman who understands commander’s intent, has an agile mindset, has harnessed foundational competencies, and therefore earns empowerment,” Webb said.Over the past 18 months, AETC has made strides in accelerating change amid adapting to the pandemic, but Webb insists there’s more work to be done. His focus remains on cultivating an environment of excellence through valuing and increasing diversity in the force.“The Airmen and Guardians who are in our force should be a reflection of America...all of which develop a force into the lethal weapon that we need it to be,” Webb said.Webb has held “Real Talks” over the last year, hosting live personal conversations with Airmen of various backgrounds online. What started in response to the initial racial disparity review for African-American males in service, has expanded as a platform for Webb and all Airmen to join in open conversations about diverse backgrounds, including race, gender and religion.While Webb is grateful for the Airmen who have been willing to share their experiences on such a public forum, he continues to encourage all leaders to hold small-group conversations, in a safe space and most importantly, to listen.“Are you really listening? Are your ears really open? And are you really being vulnerable to what Airmen are saying?” Webb stressed. “Because I can tell you, your Airmen are.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAir Education and Training CommandAFAAir Force Associationair space and cyber conferencedevelopingleaders
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/       Jiang      Chen                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| JIANG      CHEN                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|  Date:  April      14, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN NORRIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 215 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN NORRIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 216 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2011-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2013.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2014.

 

1

----

 

March 27, 2014

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman     |
|   | Title: | President               |

 

2

----
#### RAYMOND DELANEY v. AMERICAN TRANS CO.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 18448-0-III.

Division Three.

April 20, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Chadine R. Taylor, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 98-1-00080-2, Robert Leigh Zagelow, J., entered April 28, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Kato, J.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Public Announcement Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

DATE AND TIME: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, September 9, 2010.

PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS CONSIDERED: The following matter will be considered during the 
closed meeting:
    Consideration of four original jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 
CFR 2.27 Final recommendation on probationary period for hearing 
examiner.

AGENCY CONTACT: Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, 
United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

DATES: September 3, 2010.

Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-22689 Filed 9-8-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of VII Peaks Co-Optivist Income
BDC II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Gurpreet S. Chandhoke, the Chief Executive Officer and President, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated this 14thday
    of April, 2016 | By: | /s/ Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                                                                                              
|------------------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                      |     | Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                                                                                                  
|                                      |     | Chairman of the Board of Directors,
        Chief Executive Officer and President
        (Principal Executive Officer)
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 1 CAUSE NO. DC-13-14961

TXU ENERGY RETAIL COMPANY LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

FORT BEND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

116TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiff TXU Energy Retail Company L.L.C. (TXU) desires to appeal from the Order

g ranting Defendant Fort Bend Independent School District’s Second Plea to the Jurisdiction and

Motion for Summary Judgment dated November 24, 2015.

TXU appeals to the Fifth District Court of Appeals. FILED DALLAS COUNTY 12/14/2015 2:38:22 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK Bridgette VationPLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 2 Respectfully submitted,

GRUBER HURST JOHANSEN HAIL SHANK LLP

By: /s/ John Franklin Guild Michael K. Hurst State Bar No. 10316310 mhurst@ghjhlaw.com A. Shonn Brown State Bar No. 24007164 sbrown@ghjhlaw.com John Franklin Guild State Bar No. 24041022 jguild@ghjhlaw.com Jonathan R. Childers State Bar No. 24050411 jchilders@ghjhlaw.com

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone No. (214) 855-6800 Facsimile No. (214) 855-6808

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TXU ENERGY RETAIL COMPANY LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct co py of the above and for egoing has been served upon all counsel of record via eservice on this 14th day of December, 2015 as set forth below:

Richard A. Morris rmorris@rmgllp.com Jonathan G. Brush jbrust@rmgllp.com Stephanie E. Maher smaher@rmgllp.com Robers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P. 5718 Westheimer, Suite 1200 Houston, Texas 77057

/s/ John Franklin Guild John Franklin Guild
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7161]

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State under section 7046(b) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), which incorporates by reference and amends, in part, section 7046(d) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-8) (FY 2009 SFOAA), I hereby determine and certify that the Government of Colombia is meeting the conditions described in section 7046(d)(2) of the FY 2009 SFOAA, and that I have consulted with Congress as consistent with section 7046(d)(1) of the FY 2009 SFOAA, as amended.

Dated: August 31, 2010. 

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-22758 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 304 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the 

State of Mississippi 2 parcels of surplus land within 

the boundary of the Natchez Trace Parkway, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 304 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natchez Trace Park3 way Land Conveyance Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en7 titled ‘‘Natchez Trace Parkway, Proposed Boundary 

8 Change’’, numbered 604/105392, and dated Novem9 ber 2010. 

10 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of the Interior. 

12 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

13 of Mississippi. 

14 SEC. 3. LAND CONVEYANCE. 

15 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

17 the Secretary shall convey to the State, by quitclaim 

18 deed and without consideration, all right, title, and 

19 interest of the United States in and to the parcels 

20 of land described in subsection (b). 

21 (2) COMPATIBLE USE.—The deed of conveyance 

22 to the parcel of land that is located southeast of 

23 U.S. Route 61/84 and which is commonly known as 

24 the ‘‘bean field property’’ shall reserve an easement 

25 to the United States restricting the use of the parcel 
3 

†S 304 ES

1 to only those uses which are compatible with the 

2 Natchez Trace Parkway. 

3 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcels of land re4 ferred to in subsection (a) are the 2 parcels totaling ap5 proximately 67 acres generally depicted as ‘‘Proposed 

6 Conveyance’’ on the map. 

7 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file 

8 and available for public inspection in the appropriate of9 fices of the National Park Service. 

10 SEC. 4. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS. 

11 (a) EXCLUSION OF CONVEYED LAND.—On comple12 tion of the conveyance to the State of the land described 

13 in section 3(b), the boundary of the Natchez Trace Park14 way shall be adjusted to exclude the conveyed land. 

15 (b) INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL LAND.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Effective on the date of en17 actment of this Act, the boundary of the Natchez 

18 Trace Parkway is adjusted to include the approxi19 mately 10 acres of land that is generally depicted as 

20 ‘‘Proposed Addition’’ on the map. 
4 

†S 304 ES

1 (2) ADMINISTRATION.—The land added under 

2 paragraph (1) shall be administered by the Secretary 

3 as part of the Natchez Trace Parkway. 

Passed the Senate June 19, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 304 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to 

way, and for other purposes. within the boundary of the Natchez Trace Parkthe State of Mississippi 2 parcels of surplus land
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: BRUCE LEE ALLEN, DBA Bruce

Allen Construction,

 Debtor,

BRUCE LEE ALLEN,

 Appellant,

 v.

GARY L. RAINSDON, Chapter 7 Trustee;

ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK,

 Appellees.

No. 14-60001

BAP No. 13-1107

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Jury, Kirscher, and Kurtz, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

FILED

AUG 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Bruce Lee Allen, a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order

approving the Chapter 7 trustee’s settlement of claims that Allen asserted in state

court against Zions First National Bank. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of

review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. Boyajian v. New

Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian), 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by approving the

settlement agreement because the record supports the bankruptcy court’s

conclusion that the settlement was fair and equitable. See Martin v. Kane (In re

A&C Props.), 784 F.2d 1377, 1380-83 (9th Cir. 1986) (approval of a compromise

is not an abuse of discretion where the record contains a factual foundation

establishing that the compromise was fair and equitable). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in Allen’s opening brief to the BAP. See Burnett v. Resurgent Capital Servs. (In re

Burnett), 435 F.3d 971, 976-77 (9th Cir. 2006) (issues not presented to BAP are

waived unless there are “exceptional circumstances”).

All pending requests are denied as moot. 

AFFIRMED.

2 14-60001