alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4673]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            A FAILURE TO ACT

  (Mr. DeLAY asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DeLAY. Mr. Speaker, as we start the budget process today, we will 
hear many doomsday predictions from liberal Democrats about the 
Republican approach to balancing the budget.
  Sadly, we will not hear a thing about the Democrat approach because 
there is no Democrat approach to balancing the budget. That failure to 
act is a monumental decision.
  A failure to act on the budget means higher interest rates, slower 
economic growth, and less job opportunity for working Americans.
  A failure to act means higher taxes and more wasteful government 
spending. A failure to act means less buying power for American 
families, a heavier burden on our middle class, less stability for our 
senior citizens.
  A failure to act means a bankrupt Medicare system. A failure to act 
means a less secure future for our children.
  Mr. Speaker, the Democrats have failed to act, and that failure is 
completely irresponsible. I urge the American people to keep that in 
mind as House Democrats come to the floor with their hysterical 
charges.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases the ‘Purple Book’Published Sept. 22, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force added another guide, titled The Joint Team, or the “Purple Book,” to its arsenal of foundational documents dedicated to developing Total Force Airmen.
The “Purple Book” educates Airmen on how airpower fits into the Joint Force construct and identifies the joint doctrine, values, capabilities, and warfighting concepts that capture how the Air Force effectively partners with other services to protect America’s interests across the globe.
“Today, we find ourselves in an era of strategic competition against adversaries who seek to outpace and eventually overtake us," said Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass. "Every Airman must know what is at stake and understand the critical importance of synchronizing our capabilities with our joint partners to amplify our collective strength and power."
The new book provides a baseline for understanding the value each service contributes to the Joint Force and outlines the essential framework to work with other branches to compete, deter, and win the high-end fight.
The new “Purple Book” explains all service members are part of a Profession of Arms. This holds them to a strong set of Joint Core Values and supports a foundational strategy to defeat any threat, anytime and anywhere.
Additionally, it clarifies the fundamental questions all Airmen must answer: “How do I fit into the Joint Force;” and “How can I ensure I hone and deliver my unique capabilities to assure its success?” This guide helps Airmen internalize what it means to fight jointly, understand the missions of the joint force, appreciate the joint organizations that are leading the fight, comprehend how to integrate into a joint warfighting environment, and identify how the Air Force fits into the joint construct.
"Airmen of tomorrow will be required to collaborate and communicate with our joint teammates to win in future complex and contested environments," said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. CQ Brown, Jr. "We owe our Airmen a solid foundation on jointness much earlier in their careers."
Developing and updating these guides was part of the 28 Enlisted Force Development Action Plan objectives focused on developing the future enlisted force. The new "Purple Book" can be found here. The revised “Brown Book” can be found here. The revised “Blue Book” can be found here.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



CSAF 



CQ Brown Jr. 



CMSAF 



JoAnne S. Bass 



the Purple Book 



the Blue Book 



the Brown Book 



Enlisted Force Development Action Plan 



Joint Force 



collaboration 



total force 



joint doctrine 



future fight 



professional development Related Links
        CMSAF announces ‘Purple Book,’ talks people, readiness, culture at AFA
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1063]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     FINDING SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES; 
   INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE INCENTIVES FOR NON-PROFIT 
                         ORGANIZATION OUTREACH

                                 ______

                        HON. FORTNEY PETE STARK

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 17, 1995
  Mr. STARK. Mr. Speaker, the Supplemental Security Income [SSI] 
Program was begun to provide a safety net for our country's elderly, 
blind, and disabled persons with limited income and resources.
  Over the years I have followed the outreach efforts of the Social 
Security Administration to inform potential eligible people about the 
SSI Program. In 1989 a Health and Human Services study indicated that 
that 35 percent of potentially eligible recipients were not 
participating in the SSI Program. Congress mandated funds to the SSA in 
fiscal year 1990 and 1991 for outreach projects in an effort to enroll 
these potential recipients.
  Many outreach programs designed and carried out by local government 
and nonprofit organizations have been funded by these appropriated 
funds. Outreach programs inform the SSA staff of the most effective 
means of reaching potentially eligible recipients of the SSI Program 
and assist recipients through the complicated application process.
  Alameda County in California has been very effective in reaching 
Southeast Asian potential recipients through an outreach program that 
reaches into the community through mutual assistance groups.
  In Arizona third parties using a variety of outreach techniques, 
including language groups, successfully funded eligible recipients and 
streamlined their application process by completing the many necessary 
forms for them.
  These examples point to what maybe the most effective way of 
contacting these hard to reach people. The use of existing private 
nonprofit community groups. I suppose that one of the quickest and most 
economical ways of finding and signing up eligible people for the SSI 
Program would be to use the staffs of nonprofit organizations who 
already work with the poor. Many of these people are very knowledgeable 
about the program and have the trust of potential recipients. Help in 
filing out the forms and collection of the necessary documentation 
would greatly assist the overworked SSA staff.
  In return the nonprofit organizations would receive a fixed amount of 
money for each person they ``sign up'' that was actually eligible for 
the SSI Program.
  This idea is the basis for the legislation I am introducing today. My 
bill creates two demonstration projects, one in a poor urban area and 
one in a poor rural area, to test this idea of providing an award for 
successful outreach.

                          ____________________
```
#### CAROL SMOLINSKI v. DENNIS SMOLINSKI.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification is dismissed as

moot.
#### Joseph Viviola v. Edward Kuezek.

(No. 52, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 83.)

Appeal from Fayette County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 634. *New trial; conflict in evidence; practice on ap*peal, *with regard to.*The principles which would authorize the appellate court in setting aside the verdict, upon the ground that the finding is contrary to the evidence, in cases where there is a conflict in the evidence, are wrnll settled. Where the court below in a civil case has exercised its discretion, and refused to set aside the verdict and judgment, this court will not interfere, unless it appear that the judgment is *clearly wrong.*The presiding judge, being an eye and ear witness at the trial, cognizant of all the circumstances attending it, observing *340the appearance of the witnesses, their attitudes, intonations of voice, consistency or contradictions, must he infinitely better qualified to judge of the propriety of granting a new trial than we can be, who see the case only as it appears upon the record. “The jury are the exclusive judges of the weight and credibility of testimony, and especially is this the case where the testimony is conflicting. Under such circumstances it is well settled in the adjudications of this court that a verdict will not be disturbed because the jury may have erred. In order to justify this court in setting aside a verdict, it is not sufficient that it does not appear clearly to be right; it must appear to be clearly wrong.” [Stroud v. Springfield, 28 Tex. 649; Ables v. Donley, 8 Tex. 363.]

§ 635. *Attachment; remedy by, and consequences of resorting to.*The remedy by attachment is a hard one, as has been often said. A party, on his own affidavit, may seize the goods of another, take them from his possession, stop his business, put him to great inconvenience, and injure his business and credit. The only security that the citizen can have against this most summary remedy is that the defendant has a right to require the plaintiff to comply strictly with the conditions on which this remedy is granted. It is intended to aid honest men, and assist them in collecting their debts whenever they can comply strictly with the conditions of the statute with regard to attachments. But it was never intended that it should be used wrongfully or maliciously. A party who resorts to an attachment process does so at his peril. No belief, however firm and sincere, that the grounds set out in his affidavit for an attachment are true, if they are untrue, can affect the defendant’s right to recover the actual damages sustained by reason of the wrongful suing out of this process. [Drake on Attach'ments, ll4.] And if it was not only wrongfully sued out, but was also maliciously done, and without probable cause for believing the ground of the attachment to be true, he is liable, in addition, for vindictive or exemplary *341damages, as a punishment upon him for his wrongful and oppressive use of this process. [See an able discussion of the subject in Culberson v. Cabeen, 29 Tex. 255.]

February 8, 1877.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                           RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
                   NAMES JORGE L. RICO CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA, AUGUST 2, 2002 . . . RAMSAY YOUTH SERVICES, INC.
(NASDAQ:RYOU) today announced that Jorge L. Rico has been promoted to the
position of Chief Operating Officer after serving as acting Chief Operating
Officer for the past seven months.

Mr. Rico is a seasoned management professional with 15 years of healthcare
industry experience. Mr. Rico has held senior management positions in
operations, administration and technology support services and most recently was
vice president of operations for Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. Prior to joining
Ramsay, Mr. Rico was vice president of administration and information technology
for United HealthCare of Florida, Inc.

In announcing the executive appointment, Luis E. Lamela, President and CEO of
Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. said, "We would like to congratulate Jorge L. Rico
on his promotion. Mr. Rico has been an important contributor to the success of
the Company since he joined the firm in 1997. He has outstanding leadership
qualities and the ability to execute our business plan. I have confidence that
Mr. Rico will lead our operations team in continuing to deliver quality
behavioral healthcare programs and services to those we serve."

Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. is a leading provider and manager of mental health,
substance abuse and behavioral healthcare programs and services in residential
and non-residential settings in ten states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in
this news release are forward-looking statements as defined under the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Actual operations and results may differ materially from those expected in the
forward-looking statements made by the Company. Please refer to Ramsay's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional information,
specifically the Risk Factors section in the Company's form 10K for the year
ended December 31, 2001.




Contact: Isa Diaz
         Executive Vice President
         Corporate Relations
         (305) 569-4626
[No. 23956-6-II.

Division Two.

April 21, 2000.]

#### Salvador Villanueva, *Appellant,*v. Gary Moore, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 97-2-01083-4, Richard A. Strophy, J., entered October 16, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 179 (Thursday, September 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces meetings of scientific peer 
review groups. The subcommittees listed below are part of the Agency's 
Health Services Research Initial Review Group Committee.
    The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. These discussions are 
likely to involve information concerning individuals associated with 
the applications, including assessments of their personal 
qualifications to conduct their proposed projects. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    1. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Research Training.
    Date: October 14-15, 2010 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on 
October 14 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott Gaithersburg Hotel, 9751 Washingtonian 
Boulevard, Conference Room TBD, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.

    2. Name of Subcommittee: Health Systems Research.
    Date: October 19-20, 2010 (Open from 8:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on 
October 19 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott Gaithersburg Hotel, 9751 Washingtonian 
Boulevard, Conference Room TBD, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.

    3. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Quality and Effectiveness 
Research.
    Date: October 19-20, 2010 (Open from 8:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on 
October 19 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott Gaithersburg Hotel, 9751 Washingtonian 
Boulevard, Conference Room TBD, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.

    4. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Technology and Decision 
Sciences.
    Date: October 27-28, 2010 (Open from 8:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on 
October 27 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: The Legacy Hotel & Meeting Centre, 1775 Rockville Pike, 
Conference Room TBD, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of the meetings 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 2000, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: September 7, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-23112 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
Order entered November 7, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01068-CR

No. 05-13-01069-CR

MATTHEW JAMES AYERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F03-01252-K, F03-01253-K

ORDER

The clerk’s record has been filed in cause no. 05-13-01069-CR, but has not been filed in 

cause no. 05-13-01068-CR. Moreover, the reporter’s record is overdue.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in 

cause no. 05-13-01068-CR (trial court no. F03-01252-K) within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of 

this order.

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.
 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### J. H. Calloway v. B. M. Baldwin.

(No. 1397, Op. Book No. 3, p. 589.)

Error from Harrison County.

November 18, 1882.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 591. *Limitation; verbal promise to pay a barred debt will not defeat the statute of.*A verbal promise to pay a debt barred by the statute of limitation will not defeat a plea of the statute of limitation. To have this effect, such a promise must be in writing. [R. S. 3219.]

§ 593. *Bankruptcy; verbal promise to pay debt discharged by, is valid.*A verbal promise to pay a debt which has been discharged in bankruptcy, made by the bankrupt after his discharge, is a valid promise, and can be enforced. [4 Rawle, 452; 14 Johnson, 178; 12 N. Y. 637; 3 Am. Rep. 135-138; 3 Am. Dec. 45; 27 Am. Dec. 454; 13 Am. Rep. 543; 61 Mass. 482; 8 Humph. 510; 28 Miss. 702; 16 Ala. 261.]

§ 593. *Bankruptcy ivill suspend limitation, when, etc.*If a creditor filed his claim with the register in bankruptcy, this would suspend limitation during the pend-ency of the bankruptcy, but where he did not so file his claim, the bankrupt proceeding did not interrupt the running of limitation. [Wofford v. Unger, 53 Tex. 634.]

Reversed and remanded.
Order filed October 9, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00715-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF H.P.J., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-27477

ORDER

Appellant’s brief discloses the name of a person who was a minor when the 

underlying suit was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9(a)(3). Accordingly, the brief is 

STRICKEN. 

Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.9 on or before October 19, 2018.

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 26, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Tuesday, October 26, 2010, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: September 1, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2010-22573 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P