alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33.4


(logo) NTS


NATIONAL TAX


SEARCH, LLC.




REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA




For the calendar year ending December 31, 2011, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Servicer”).




National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2011 and for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report included all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).




NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.




Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.




National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer




/s/ Lori D. Eshoo


Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO


January 16, 2012




303 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1040


Chicago, IL 60601


Telephone: (312) 233-6440


Facsimile: (312) 540-3770




(logo) Certified


WBENC


Women’s Business Enterprise
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

We hereby
consent to the use by SandRidge Permian Trust. (the Trust), of our name and to the inclusion of information taken from the reports listed below in the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 26, 2012:

December 31,
2011, SandRidge Permian Trust. Interest in Certain Properties located in the United States  SEC Price Case



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ C.H. (Scott) Rees IIIC.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

March 22, 2012
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6202]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. DASCHLE (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Kohl, Mrs. 
             Feinstein, and Mr. Dodd):
       S. 761. A bill to improve the ability of the United States 
     to respond to the international terrorist threat; read the 
     first time.
           By Mr. HARKIN:
       S. 762. A bill to implement General Accounting Office 
     recommendations regarding the use of commercial software to 
     detect billing code abuse in Medicare claims processing, and 
     for other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sports Resorts International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory T. Strzynski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gregory T. Strzynski
-------------------------
Gregory T. Strzynski
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4546]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          ADDITIONAL SPONSORS

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 28: Mr. McCollum and Mr. Traficant.
       H.R. 38: Mr. Tucker, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Matsui, 
     Mr. Stearns, Mr. Scarborough, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Bliley, Ms. 
     Woolsey, Mr. Wamp, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Leach, Mr. 
     McInnis, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Dunn of Washington, Mr. Emerson, Mr. 
     Ensign, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Heineman, Mr. Young of 
     Alaska, Mr. Bryant of Texas, Mr. Brewster, Mr. Camp, Mr. 
     Bishop, Mr. Condit, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. 
     Young of Florida, Mr. Peterson of Florida, and Mr. Bonilla.
       H.R. 315: Mr. Gutierrez.
       H.R. 359: Ms. Roybal-Allard and Mr. Smith of Texas.
       H.R. 438: Mr. Cooley.
       H.R. 553: Mr. Wynn.
       H.R. 713: Mr. Hefner, Mr. Holden, Mr. Luther, Ms. Norton, 
     Mr. Stupak, and Mr. Torkildsen.
       H.R. 752: Mr. Hayes, Mr. Mascara, Mr. Burr, Mr. Chapman, 
     Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Funderburk, and Mr. Houghton.
       H.R. 783: Mr. Ward, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, and Mr. 
     Chambliss.
       H.R. 820: Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Clinger, Mr. Hefner, Mr. 
     Coble, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Clement, Mr. Hoekstra, 
     Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Petri, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Parker, 
     Mr. Jones, Mr. Holden, and Mr. Latham.
       H.R. 893: Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Berman, Mr. Borski, and Mr. 
     Frost.
       H.R. 985: Mr. McCrery.
       H.R. 997: Mr. Bevill, Mr. Canady, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Deutsch, 
     Mr. Everett, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Horn, Mr. Martinez, 
     Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Smith of New 
     Jersey, and Mr. DeFazio.
       H.R. 1018: Mr. Shays.
       H.R. 1023: Mr. LaFalce.
       H.R. 1085: Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 1242: Mr. Bryant of Tennessee and Mrs. Myrick.
       H.R. 1252: Mr. Fattah and Mr. Smith of New Jersey.
       H.R. 1272: Mrs. Clayton.
       H.R. 1329: Ms. Lowey, Mr. Clyburn, and Mr. Lipinski.
       H.R. 1330: Mr. Pickett, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Smith of Texas, 
     Mr. McCrery, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Condit, Mr. 
     Tanner, Mr. Cremeans, Mr. Scarborough, and Mr. Radanovich.
       H.R. 1400: Mr. Conyers and Mr. Lewis of Georgia.
       H.R. 1422: Mr. Gutierrez.
       H.R. 1504: Mr. Ewing, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
     Rahall, and Mr. Martinez.
       H.R. 1512: Mr. Hancock.
       H.J. Res. 79: Mr. Chapman, Mr. Condit, Mr. Gekas, Mr. Smith 
     of Texas, and Mr. Mollohan.
       H.J. Res. 84: Mr. Owens, Mr. Rangel, and Ms. Norton.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Displaying "Old Glory" with honorPublished July 3, 2019
                        
                        By USAN H. LAWSON
                        
                        
                        Defense News
                **TYSONS, Va. (AFNS) --**
                This week, American flags will be displayed across the nation in celebration of the Independence Day holiday. Following a few guidelines can ensure we are displaying Old Glory properly.In 1923, the U.S. National Flag Code was created and distributed nationwide. The code became Public Law in 1942 and became the U.S. Flag Code we know today. The U.S. Flag Code lays out the ways to display and respect the flag of the United States.For example:The flag should not be on display outdoors during bad weather.The flag should not be used for advertising purposes, or embroidered on cushions, handkerchiefs, napkins or boxes.The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding or drapery.It should never be displayed upside down unless trying to convey a sign of distress or great danger.When displayed either horizontally or vertically against a wall, the union should be uppermost and to the flag's own right, that is, to the observer's left. When displayed in a window, the flag should be displayed in the same way, with the union or blue field to the left of the observer in the street.Clean and damage-free flags should always be used. Dirty, ripped, wrinkled or frayed flags should not be used. Also, when flags are damaged, they should be destroyed in a dignified manner.The U.S. flag should flow freely in the wind or in a lobby with a passing breeze as people walk past. Stretching a flag is a lot like walking around with your arms held out straight. It is not to be held captive by metal arm spreaders as if to say, "Look at me!"Staffs and finials should always be upright and not leaning.Clamping a U.S. flag to a vehicle's antenna is acceptable, or the flagstaff clamped to the right fender, as long as the flag displays in the proper direction.Service flags are displayed in order of service precedence, not the host service where they are displayed. The order of precedence is Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard.Army music unit wearing 18th-century style uniforms participates in parade.When displaying the U.S. flag with other flags, the U.S. flag comes first and is centered in the middle of a flag display. In addition, the U.S. flag must be placed higher than the other flags, unless other national flags are present. In that case the U.S. flag would be the same height.Buntings are a good way to display the national colors and decorate for Independence Day without discrediting the U.S. flag.AFWN 



old glory 



honor 



Independence Day 



July 4th 



U.S. National Flag Code 



respect 



display rules 



etiquette 



ACC 



U.S. Flag
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         726,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,863,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                   665,919
<INVENTORY>                                 17,818,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,228,576
<PP&E>                                      28,842,356
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,211,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,687,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,213,554
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,462,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,687,349
<SALES>                                    100,444,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           100,444,533
<CGS>                                       84,763,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               98,370,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,967,588)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,008
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,547,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,364,016
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,300,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Air Force engineer wins national recognitionPublished Feb. 20, 2020
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Robert Barnett
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Civil Engineer Tim Sullivan was named the 2020 Federal Engineer of the Year during a ceremony, Feb. 14, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.The award recognizes federal, licensed engineers worldwide for their professional service, engineering achievements, professional and technical society activities, education, awards and honors, as well as civic and humanitarian activities. The recipient is determined by a panel of judges established by the National Society of Professional Engineers.Utilizing his background in nuclear, mechanical, environmental and civil engineering, Sullivan, who currently serves as the chief of the technical services division at the Air Force Civil Engineer Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, developed a comprehensive execution guide to support a three-year series of construction projects nationwide, totaling $604 million. These projects included a risk-management process to identify vulnerabilities of construction projects that cost the government more than $5 million.“I am humbled to receive this prestigious award,” Sullivan said. “I appreciate the support of my amazing wife, Dr. Vicky Sullivan, as well as the Air Force Civil Engineer community. They have helped me immeasurably throughout my career.”His accomplishments also include implementing changes to the national defense building codes, which ultimately protected Air Force facilities from storms. Sullivan also supervised a $300 million environmental engineering budget that helped model and predict the environmental stability of military installations. He also mentored young engineers in their research regarding aquifer protection, water quality assessment and water source vulnerability.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Civil Engineer 



Federal Engineer of the Year 



nuclear engineering 



mechanical engineering 



environmental engineering 



civil engineering 



risk management 



Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland 



National Society of Professional Engineers
Exhibit 32.1

March 26, 2012

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Permian Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document.



The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,N.A., Trustee for SandRidge Permian TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICHMike UlrichVice President and Trust Officer
#### Johnson *v.*State.

Opinion delivered October 30, 1922.

Criminal law — harmless error. — Evidence tending to show that a State’s witness whose testimony was relied upon for conviction was prejudiced against accused, admitted as hearing upon the weight to he given such witness’ testimony, was favorable to defendant and is not ground for reversal on defendant’s appeal.

*401Appeal from Garland Circuit Court; Scott Wood, Judge,

affirmed.

*Randolph & Cobb,*for appellant.

*J. 8.*Utley, Attorney General, *Elbert Godivin*and *Wm. T. Hammock,*Assistant®, for appellee.

Wood, J.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of keeping a gambling-house under section 2632, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. A judgment was entered sentencing bim to two years’ imprisonment in the State Penitentiary, from which he appeals.

Jeff Jones, a witness on behalf of the State, testified to facts which fully justified the jury in returning a verdict of guilty. The appellant does not contend that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict, but complains because the witness, Jones, was permitted, over the objection of appellant, to testify that one time the appellant cursed him and threatened his life because he (Jones) requested that the appellant return a dollar to him which Jones claimed he had given to 'appellant for the purpose of inducing the appellant to sign an appearance bond for Jones. The specific testimony of Jones to which the appellant objected was as-follows: “I went to Dave and I asked Dave to give me my dollar and Dave said, ‘I ain’t going to’give you a damn thing— I will blow your G — • damn brains out if you don’t get out of here.’ I said, ‘Well, that is all you can do is to blow my brains out.’ He said, ‘G— damn you, if I thought you had a pocket-knife I would blow you down right here,’ and my wife and another girl was together with me.”

The court permitted this evidence on the ground that it tended to show the interest and feeling of the witness and might be considered by the jury in weighing the witness ’ testimony. It was certainly not prejudicial to appellant to permit testimony tending to prove that the witness, upon whose testimony the State relied for conviction, was strongly prejudiced against the appellant. *402Such, testimony was favorable to the appellant, and be is in no attitude to complain of the ruling of the court. *Fort*v. *State,*52 Ark. 180; *National Produce Co.*v. *Garrett,*121 Ark. 570.

Since the ruling of the court was not prejudicial to appellant, the judgment is correct and it is affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Meaningful Military Capability, First Europe-Based F-35s, A New AF.MilPublished Oct. 8, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force features Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall talking about getting meaningful military capabilities into the hands of Airmen and Guardians, RAF Lakenheath activates the first Europe-based F-35A Squadron, and the official website of the United States Air Force gets a redesign that offers new user experiences. (Hosted by Tech Sgt. Eric Mann)  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:**- Kendall presents unsparing blueprint for confronting China, other threats** **- U.S. Air Force activates first Europe-based F-35A Squadron****- Air Force to launch official website redesign, temporarily pause new content for updates**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50454 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JOSE MUNOZ-MONREAL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-94-CR-261-DB
- - - - - - - - - - February 2, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Munoz-Monreal appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. He argues that the district court abused its discretion by admitting hearsay evidence and that the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of a government witness. Given the fact that Munoz-Monreal first introduced the challenged hearsay testimony upon his redirect examination of Agent Martinez, the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the testimony.No. 95-50454 -2- See United States v. Deisch , 20 F.3d 139, 154 (5th Cir. 1994). In any event, any error from the admission of the testimony was harmless. See United States v. Sanchez-Sotelo , 8 F.3d 202, 210 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 1410 (1994). Further, because the prosecutor's comment was "invited" by defense counsel's implication that a government witness had violated the terms of his plea agreement and "did no more than respond substantially in order to `right the scale,'" reversal on this issue is not warranted. See United States v. Arce , 997 F.2d 1123, 1130 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
#### ALEX GOTTDIENER v. TOWNSHIP OF ROXBURY.

March 14, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Verastem, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Robert Forrester, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | /s/ Robert Forrester    |
|------------------------|-------------------------|
|                   | Robert Forrester        |
|                   | Chief Operating Officer |
|                   |                    |
| Date:   March 30, 2012 |                    |

 

----