alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4868]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     REPORT ON RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 584, 
 CONVEYANCE OF THE FAIRPORT NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF IOWA

  Mr. McINNIS, from the Committee on Rules, submitted a privileged 
report (Rept. No. 104-117) on the resolution (H. Res. 145) providing 
for consideration of the bill (H.R. 584) to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to convey a fish hatchery to the State of Iowa, which was 
referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed.

                          ____________________
```
No. 87-5958.

#### McKoy *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6846
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY SINCLAIR WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-83) Submitted: March 20, 2006 Decided: May 9, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Sinclair Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael James Elston, Assistant United States Attorney, Owen Matthew Kendler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Sinclair Williams, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. Williams’ motion sought relief from the district court’s 1993 order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
News United States Air Force
 Next F-35 training squadron to be located at Eglin AFBPublished May 9, 2019
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force announced May 9 Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, is the preferred alternative to receive an additional F-35A Lighting II training squadron.
Eglin AFB was the location of the F-35 initial joint training site hosting Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps F-35s. The Marine Corps relocated its F-35Bs in 2014 and the Navy announced its plans to relocate F-35Cs in 2019.
“By basing the next F-35A training squadron at Eglin Air Force Base, we are taking advantage of existing facilities and training air space,” said Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson.
Additional F-35As are expected to begin arriving in the fall of 2021. The new squadron is expected to reach full operational capability by spring 2023.
“The F-35 is a game-changer with its unprecedented combination of lethality, survivability and adaptability,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein. “Bringing this new training squadron to Eglin (AFB) allows us to expand Fifth Generation fighter training so we can dominate in any conflict.”
Eglin AFB will only receive the additional F-35 training unit if the F-22 Raptor formal training unit temporarily operating at Eglin AFB is permanently moved to Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia.
In March, the Air Force acknowledged plans to move the F-22 training unit to JB Langley-Eustis, pending the outcome of the National Environmental Policy Act and other regulatory and planning processes. This F-35 basing action is also dependent on completing the environmental analysis.AFWN 



F-35 



training 



squadron 



Eglin AFB 



Navy 



Marine Corps 



f-35b 



F-22 



Lightning II 



Raptor 



Initial Joint Training Site 



Secretary of the Air Force 



SecAF 



Heather Wilson 



AF 



Air Force 



F-35C
# CERTIFICATION

 

Re:      Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2011-C3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2011-C3 (the “Transaction”), issued pursuant to thePooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the “Pooling andServicing Agreement”), executed in connection with the Transaction (capitalizedterms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Poolingand Servicing Agreement).

 

I, George Kok, certify that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofMorgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2011-C3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances

           under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer(s)  have fulfilled their obligationsunder the 

           servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.        All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this 

           report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation ABand Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described 

           in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties:

 

·        U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

·        Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer

·        Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor

·        CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant

·        National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant

 

 

Date:  April 2, 2018

 

 

By /s/ George Kok

Name: George Kok

Title: President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2985 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2985

To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota 
             as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2014

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Franken) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota 
             as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 133 at Forest 
Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Duluth, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the segment of Interstate Route 35 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4436-H4437]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Waldholtz) laid before the House the 
following communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

                      [[Page H4437]] House of Representatives,

                                   Washington, DC, April 25, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     The Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     clause 5 of rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, the Clerk received the following message 
     from the Secretary of the Senate, on Tuesday, April 25, 1995 
     at 9:40 a.m.: that the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 
     1380.
       With great respect, I am
           Sincerely yours,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
     Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
EX-10.49



 Exhibit 10.49 

                    
    , 2014 
 Virgin America Inc. 

555 Airport Blvd. 
 Burlingame, CA 94010 

Attention: General Counsel 
 Ladies/Gentlemen: 

In consideration of the execution by Virgin America Inc. (the “Company”) of the Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the
undersigned and the other parties thereto and the Recapitalization Agreement among the Company, the undersigned and the other parties thereto, as well as other valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are acknowledged, effective
upon the completion of the Company’s initial public offering of its common stock and at all times thereafter, the undersigned agree that neither the undersigned nor Virgin Group Holdings or any of their respective affiliates (as defined in the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) (collectively, the “Virgin Group”) will acquire additional shares of the Company’s Voting Common Stock if, as a result of such acquisition, the Virgin Group would hold in excess of twenty
(20) percent of the total outstanding shares of the Company’s Voting Common Stock (as defined in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation) without the consent of the Company. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that applicable law is amended to permit persons who are not “citizens of the United
States” to own more than twenty-five (25) percent of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Voting Common Stock, the foregoing shall apply such that the twenty (20) percent threshold shall instead equal (i) the maximum
percentage of voting securities which the amended applicable law allows non-U.S. citizens to own, less (ii) 5%. 
 In determining the
percentage of the Company’s Voting Common Stock outstanding, the parties agree that the Virgin Group shall be entitled to rely conclusively upon the Company’s publicly available reports of its Voting Common Stock as published in
Company’s most-recently filed quarterly report on Form 10-Q or annual report on Form 10-K or on the Company’s investor relations web site, or upon information provided to the Virgin Group by the Company at the Virgin Group’s request.

 Please have an authorized representative of Virgin America Inc. sign below to confirm our mutual agreement on the matters set forth
herein. 
  







 Very truly yours, 
  

			
	VX Holdings, L.P.
		
	By:	 	 
		
	Title: 	 	 
	
	Virgin Management Limited
		
	By:	 	 
		
	Title: 	 	 
	
	VA Holdings (Guernsey) LP
		
	By:	 	 
		
	Title: 	 	 


  

			
	AGREED:
	
	Virgin America Inc.
		
	By:	 	 
		
	Title:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 18, 2015

 

 
|   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5055]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Oregon [Mr. DeFazio] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  [Mr. DeFAZIO addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 34.1






ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH




SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES










REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Members


Entergy Louisiana, LLC


Baton Rouge, Louisiana





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 28, 2014
#### PAUL PETRONE, INC., ETC. v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5663-S5664]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United 
[[Page S5664]] States submitting sundry nominations which were referred 
to the appropriate committees.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
S. 2651 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To repeal certain mandates of the Department of Homeland Security Office of 

Inspector General. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS OIG Mandates Revision 

Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE CARGO INSPECTION TARGETING SYSTEM.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Subsections (g) and (h) of section 809 of the 

Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 (Public 

Law 108–293; 46 U.S.C. 70101 note) are repealed. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 809 of the Coast 

Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 (Public Law 

108–293; 118 Stat. 1085), as amended by paragraph (1), is 

amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and (j)’’ and inserting 

‘‘and (h)’’; and 

(B) by redesignating subsections (i), (j), and (k) as 

subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively. 

(b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL REVIEW

OF COAST GUARD PERFORMANCE.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 888(f) of the Homeland Security Act 

of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 468(f)) is repealed. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 888 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 468), as amended by paragraph (1), is amended by redesignating subsections (g), (h), 

and (i) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively. 

(c) ANNUAL REVIEW OF GRANTS TO STATES AND HIGH-RISK

URBAN AREAS.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 2022(a)(3) of the Homeland Security 

Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 612(a)(3)) is repealed. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2022(a) of the 

Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 612(a)), as amended 

by paragraph (1), is amended— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7) 

as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; 

(B) in paragraph (4), as redesignated— 

(i) by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; and 
S. 2651—2 

(ii) by striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’. 

(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 2015. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.