alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Danielle Olsen, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K /A Amendment No. 1 of Mobile Vault, Inc.;  2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.          The small business issuer’s sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5.          The small business issuer’s sole officer, I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: February 27, 2013  /s/ Danielle Olsen Chief Executive Officer, President
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates







NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION






OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE






The undersigned, Jeffrey L. Edwards, Vice-President, Operations of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as an Authorized Officer of the Company:






(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of:  i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement, of the Company during the period July 25, 2011 through March 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”); and






(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, i) the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period; and ii) no Servicer Default has occurred.






This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to (i) Section 3.01(c) of the Servicing Agreement, as amended, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust, as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer; and (ii) Section 8.11(b) of the 2011-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of July 25, 2011, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as Titling Trust, NILT Trust, as Grantor and UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer (the “Agreement”).






Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2012.




/s/ Jeffrey L. Edwards


Jeffrey L. Edwards


Vice President, Operations
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         569,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,822,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    201,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,783,000
<PP&E>                                       4,620,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,632,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,247,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,482,000
<BONDS>                                      1,137,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    400,000
<COMMON>                                       132,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,515,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,247,000
<SALES>                                     13,351,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,351,000
<CGS>                                       11,602,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,602,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                581,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            561,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   561,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 BROADWAY

Attn: Mortgage BackedSecurities

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C3

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

  

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# 4th CMS hydraulics Airmen design, use apparatus to test stabilator actuators

              - Published  Jan. 27, 2021
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Kimberly Barrera                                                    

**SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, N.C. (AFNS) --  **
The **F-15E Strike Eagle** depends on many parts to maintain operational status. One mission critical part is the stabilator actuator. Without this part, the F-15E cannot fly. The hydraulic actuator, which moves the stabilator of an F-15E, defects collectively for pitch control and differentially to add roll control power to the jet ailerons.“All over the world, this is the number one non-mission capable driver component for the F-15E,” said Tech. Sgt. Jeremy Fannin, 4th Component Maintenance Squadron centralized repair facility NCO in charge. “When these components break down, depot is not able to push them out fast enough.”To help alleviate this problem, Airmen from the 4th CMS hydraulics shop at **Seymour Johnson Air Force Base** designed an apparatus that would enable them to test stabilator actuators.“The new apparatus tests the electrical output of the physical dimensions of where the actuator is at in the aircraft,” said Staff Sgt. Steven Hall, 4th CMS centralized repair facility expeditor. “With this new process, we are pushing out stabilator actuators in about eight hours instead of 72 days, which is what depot is turning.”Fannin added the team has produced 12 serviceable assets out of the 14 or 15 that were tested. Four of these have already successfully flown on F-15Es assigned to Seymour Johnson AFB.Having the test apparatus on base results in quicker turnaround times for stabilator actuators, which in turn means more training for air crew members, more F-15Es in the air and more aircraft ready for the next mission.Right now, Seymour Johnson AFB is the only base apart from the depot facility at **Hill AFB**, Utah, that can overhaul the hydraulics side of stabilator actuators.“In the future, we will have more of these made and test apparatus will be deployable,” Hall said. “If our Airmen get a stabilator down range, it can be quickly returned to working conditions while in a deployed location instead of being sent back to our home station. Having this test apparatus allows us to maintain our aircraft and provide combat air power for America.”

SUSAFAFAir ForceACCAir Combat CommandHydraulicsstabilator actuatorinnovationdesignF-15EStrike EagleSeymour Johnson AFBHill AFB
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4794]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 10 o'clock and 43 minutes 
p.m.), the House adjourned until tomorrow, Thursday, May 11, 1995, at 
10 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.1




                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2000
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




                                          /s/ MARK S. ZUCKER
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Mark S. Zucker
                                          Chairman of the Board of
                                          Directors


                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  December 23, 2002             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
[No. 44884-6-I.

Division One.

April 17, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Earl Lee Ford, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-02619-1, Ronald Kessler, J. Pro Tem., entered June 21, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**List of Subsidiaries of WPX Energy, Inc.**

(all Delaware entities unlessotherwise indicated) 

1. Barrett Resources International Corporation – a Delaware corporation 

2. Bison Royalty, LLC 

3. Diamond Elk, LLC– a Colorado limited liability company 

4. Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC 

5. Mockingbird Pipeline, LP – a Delaware limited partnership 

6. Northwest ArgentinaCorporation – a Utah corporation 

7. RW Gathering, LLC 

8. WPX Energy Appalachia, LLC 

9. WPX Energy Arkoma Gathering, LLC 

10. WPX Energy Enterprises, Inc. – a Delaware corporation 

11. WPX Energy Gulf Coast, LP 

12. WPX Energy Holdings, LLC 

13. WPX Energy Keystone, LLC 

14. WPX EnergyMarcellus Gathering, LLC 

15. WPX Energy Mid-Continent Company, an Oklahoma corporation 

16. WPX Energy Production, LLC 

17. WPX EnergyRocky Mountain, LLC 

18. WPX Energy RM Company, a Delaware corporation 

19. WPX Energy Ryan Gulch, LLC 

20. WPX Energy Marketing, LLC 

21. WPX Energy Marketing Services Company, LLC 

22. WPX Energy Services Company, LLC 

23. WPXEnergy Van Hook Gathering Services, LLC 

24. WPX Energy Williston, LLC 

25. WPX Gas Resources Company, a Delaware corporation 

International subsidiaries:

1. WPX Energy International Oil and Gas (Venezuela), Ltd. – a Cayman Islands corporation 

2. Apco Oil and Gas International Inc. – a Cayman Islands corporation 

3. Apco Argentina S.A – an Argentina entity 

4. Apco Austral, S.A. – an Argentina entity

5. Apco Properties Ltd. – a Cayman Islands corporation
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 359 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 

the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. MCCONNELL, and Mr. MERKLEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Industrial Hemp 

5 Farming Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINI7 TION OF MARIHUANA. 

8 Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

9 U.S.C. 802) is amended— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 359 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (16)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘(16) The’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘(16)(A) The’’; and 

4 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include in6 dustrial hemp.’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(57) The term ‘industrial hemp’ means the 

9 plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, 

10 whether growing or not, with a delta-9 

11 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 

12 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION BY STATES. 

14 Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

15 U.S.C. 811) is amended by adding at the end the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(i) INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION.—If a per18 son grows or processes Cannabis sativa L. for purposes 

19 of making industrial hemp in accordance with State law, 

20 the Cannabis sativa L. shall be deemed to meet the con21 centration limitation under section 102(57), unless the At22 torney General determines that the State law is not rea23 sonably calculated to comply with section 102(57).’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SCWC-19-0000261

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

LOYALTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD.,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

WALLACE S.J. CHING, individually and in his capacity

as a Director of Loyalty Development Company, Ltd.,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000261; CIVIL NO. 16-1-1580)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Wallace S.J. Ching’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 13, 2024, is 

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding 

scheduling. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 3, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins 

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000261

03-OCT-2024

03:22 PM

Dkt. 15 OGAC
consultingagreement.htm


Exhibit 10.3   Consulting Agreement with Douglas Turnbull


 


CONSULTING CONTRACT


 







 


This Agreement is made effective as of September 1, 2014, by and between Rosewood Resources, Inc. and Douglas Turnbull, Professional Geologist of Lakehead Geological Services Inc., 300 – 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 2E9.


 


In this Agreement, the party who is contracting to receive services shall be referred to as “Rosewood Resources, Inc.” and the party who will be providing the services shall be referred to as Douglas Turnbull.


 


Douglas Turnbull has a background in geology and the exploring for minerals and is willing to provide services to Rosewood Resources, Inc. based on this background.


 


Rosewood Resources, Inc. is desires to have services provided by Douglas Turnbull.


 



	
1.  

	
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES.







 


Beginning on September 15, 1014, Douglas Turnbull will provide the following services (collectively, the “Services”):


 


To review and analyse the geological information relating to the Knott Lake Property (“Knott Lake”) located in Cairo Township in the Larder Mining District, Ontario;


 


To discuss the merits of the Knott Lake with the Board of Directors and make recommendation as to future development plans:


 


To review the proposed geological exploration program to be undertaken during the fall of 2014 and make any constructive recommendations; and


 


To advise the Board of Directors as to any impairments or litigation which might be pending relating to Knott Lake.


 







 




  





-1-











  











 


 



	
2.  

	
PERFORMANCE OF SERVICE







 


    The manner in which the Services are to be performed and the specific hours to be worked by Douglas Turnbull shall be determined the Board of Directors will rely on Douglas Turnbull to work as many hours as may be reasonably necessary to fulfill Douglas Turnbull’s obligation under this Agreement.


 



	
3.  

	
PAYMENT







 


Rosewood Resources, Inc. will pay a fee to Douglas Turnbull for theServices inthe amount of one thousand United States dollars(USD$1,000.00) eachmonth to a maximum of 24 months or until theDirectors decided thatthe Services of Douglas Turnbull are no longer required.  This fee will be paid by the middle of each month starting with September 15, 2014.


 



	
4.  

	
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT







 


           Rosewood Resources, Inc. will pay all “out-of-pocket” expenses, and shallnot be entitled to reimbursement from Douglas Turnbull.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


 


“Douglas Turnbull”                                                                


           Douglas Turnbull












ROSEWOOD RESOURCES, INC.


 


“B. Gordon Brooke”                                                                


Name:   B. Gordon Brooke


Title.     Chief Financial Officer and Director


 


 


 




  





-2-
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Physician performs Air Force’s first airway stent procedure

              - Published  Dec. 28, 2021
              -                             By Senior Airman Seth Haddix                                                    
              - 81st Training Wing Public Affairs

**KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE (AFNS) --  **
Two patients with metastatic lung cancer were rushed to an operating room at **Keesler Air Force Base’s****81st Medical Group**, struggling to breathe as tumors constricted their airways.

Maj. Derrell Nettlow, 81st Healthcare Operations Squadron pulmonary critical care physician, was called to perform the Air Force’s first **airway stent** procedure to give both patients the ability to breathe.

“I spent hours preparing for the operation,” Nettlow said. “I prepared the equipment and ran through the process in the operating room. I knew this was something I was capable of accomplishing.”With help from the pulmonary critical care clinic, Nettlow was able to successfully burn the tumors and open the patients’ airways with palliative airway stents, a tube placed into the throat that prevents it from closing.

“Nettlow’s advanced pulmonary skill set was critical for this procedure and the timing was perfect,” said Maj. John Untisz, 81st Healthcare Operations Squadron pulmonary critical care physician. “He was not only able to give the patients the ability to breathe but also gifted them the best quality of life.”

This procedure marks another successful adoption by the Air Force of a **medical advancement**, which will enable the service to work faster and smarter in life-saving situations.    

After the intense procedure, Nettlow recognized the positive impact of the situation, using this experience as an example of adapting to any life-saving situations for the medical field.

“The more complex procedures we offer and the more patients we see, the more prepared we are down range,” Nettlow said. “Developing procedural skill sets will prepare us for any operations overseas and advance our capabilities.”

Nettlow believes this procedure can set a precedent for new medical capabilities going forward.

“Airway stenting will become more common,” Nettlow said. “I see an increase in demand for this operation, and we will be able to treat more patients. This opportunity can set a precedent for our future and reach new medical possibilities across the country.”

FSUSAFAFAir ForceAirway StentcancermedicalpulmonaryKeesler AFBtechnologyOperationAETCAir Education and Training Commandreadinessinnovation