alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00747-CV

Marcelo GALVAN Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan,

Appellants

v.

Cledson Macedo de CARVALHO and Kristina Carvalho,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH001835-D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellants have 

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and that the 

appellants are not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We, therefore, ORDER the appellants to provide written proof to this court within ten 

days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have 

been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the 

clerk’s fee. If appellants fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on May 3, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”), I, James P.Santelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               ThePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 3, 2004 | /s/ JAMES P.  SANTELLI     |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                     | James P.  Santelli         |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer   |
|                     | Digital  Angel Corporation |

 

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FREDERICK S. MANN.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied. (See 171 *N.J.Super.*173)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 24-0213

_________________

JARED SUNDOWN HENDRICKSON,

 Petitioner,

 v.

JAMES SALMONSEN, WARDEN, 

Montana State Prison,

 Respondent.

O R D E R

_________________

Jared Sundown Hendrickson, via counsel, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus, alleging he is entitled to additional credit for time served. Upon review of his 

Petition and attachments, we deem it appropriate to require a response.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that that the Attorney General or counsel for the 

Department of Corrections is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this Order in which 

to prepare, file, and serve a written response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 

together with appropriate documentary exhibits.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

Jared Sundown Hendrickson personally.

Electronically signed by:

Ingrid Gustafson

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2024

04/29/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0213
S. 2921 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard in Galesburg, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lane A. 

Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANE A. EVANS VA COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT 

CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The community based outpatient clinic of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 310 Home Boulevard 

in Galesburg, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lane 

A. Evans VA Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lane A. Evans VA Community 

Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6367]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      SUBMISSION OF MOTION ADOPTED IN THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET

 Mr. DOMENICI. Mr. President, pursuant to paragraph 2 of rule 
XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I submit for printing in the 
Congressional Record a motion adopted in the Committee on the Budget on 
May 6, 1995, governing consideration of amendments during deliberations 
on the fiscal year 1996 budget resolution.
  The motion follows:

   Pay-As-You-Go Motion Making Out of Order Amendments That Are Not 
                            Deficit Neutral

       Motion that, during deliberations on the fiscal year 1996 
     budget resolution, it not be in order for the committee to 
     consider any perfecting amendment to the Chairman's Mark that 
     is not deficit neutral in each year as measured against that 
     Mark or any complete substitute amendment that fails to 
     achieve and sustain balance by fiscal year 2002 under a 
     Unified budget; provided that the President Clinton's fiscal 
     year 1996 budget shall be in order as a complete 
     substitute.
     

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 15.3

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the use in this annual report on Form 20-F of our report dated November 29, 2019, except for the effects of the restatement as discussed in Note 2 and Gold Bullion Loans as discussed in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is August 10, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation for the years ended August 31, 2019, 2018  and 2017, which appears in Tanzanian Gold Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2019, as amended, and which is incorporated by reference to Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-213604; 333-213834 and 333-226949) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-234078) and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus of such Registration Statements.

 

/s/ DMCL LLP

 

DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

 

 

Vancouver, Canada

 

August 10, 2020
Presidential Documents

1015 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 5 

Friday, January 8, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of December 15, 2009 

Directing Certain Actions with Respect to Acquisition and 

Use of Thomson Correctional Center to Facilitate Closure of 

Detention Facilities at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the Attorney General 

By the authority vested in me as President and as Commander in Chief 

of the Armed Forces of the United States by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including the Authorization for Use 

of Military Force (Public Law 107–40, 115 Stat. 224), and in order to facilitate 

the closure of detention facilities at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, I 

hereby direct that the following actions be taken as expeditiously as possible 

with respect to the facility known as the Thomson Correctional Center 

(TCC) in Thomson, Illinois: 

1. The Attorney General shall acquire and activate the TCC as a United 

States Penitentiary, which the Attorney General has determined would reduce 

the Bureau of Prisons’ shortage of high security, maximum custody cell 

space and could be used for other appropriate inmate or detainee management 

purposes. The Attorney General shall also provide to the Department of 

Defense a sufficient portion of the TCC to serve as a detention facility 

to be operated by the Department of Defense in order to accommodate 

the relocation of detainees by the Secretary of Defense in accordance with 

paragraph 2 of this memorandum. 

2. The Secretary of Defense, working in consultation with the Attorney 

General, shall prepare the TCC for secure housing of detainees currently 

held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base who have been or will be designated 

for relocation, and shall relocate such detainees to the TCC, consistent 

with laws related to Guantanamo detainees and the findings in, and interagency Review established by, Executive Order 13492 of January 22, 2009. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES2
1016 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any 

party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its 

officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 

The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 15, 2009 

[FR Doc. 2010–227 

Filed 1–7–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 5001–06–M 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES2OB#1.EPS</GPH>
[Cite as State ex rel. Davis v. Walker, 2011-Ohio-5282.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 97341

STATE OF OHIO EX REL. 

KENNETH DAVIS, JR.

RELATOR

vs. 

HONORABLE SANDRA WALKER, JUDGE

RESPONDENT 

JUDGMENT: 

DISMISSED

Writ of Procedendo 

Order No. 448219 

RELEASE DATE: October 12, 2011 

-i-
2

FOR RELATOR:

Kenneth Davis, Jr., Pro Se 

Inmate #A-564-782 

Lake Erie Correctional Institution 

P.O. Box 8000 

Conneaut, Ohio 44030 

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT:

Ronald K. Riley 

Director of Law 

City of East Cleveland 

14340 Euclid Avenue 

East Cleveland, Ohio 44112 

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J.: 

{¶ 1} Relator, Kenneth Davis, Jr., avers that he is the defendant in E. Cleveland v. 

Davis, E. Cleveland Municipal Court Case No. 08TRD04307. Davis requests that this 

court compel respondent to rule on his motion to withdraw plea. 

{¶ 2} In Hazel v. Knab, ___ Ohio St.3d ___ , 2011-Ohio-4608, ___ N.E.2d ___ 

, petitioner Hazel was incarcerated and filed an action in habeas corpus. “* * * 

[A]lthough he filed an affidavit of indigency and sought waiver of prepayment of the 

court’s filing fees, he failed to include in his affidavit of indigency a statement setting 
3

forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified 

by the institutional cashier, in violation of R.C. 2969.25(C). “The requirements of R.C. 

2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to 

dismissal.’ State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 

634, ¶5. Hazel’s subsequent filing of the statement did not cure the defect. See R.C. 

2969.25(C); see also Fuqua v. Williams, 100 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-Ohio-5533, 797 

N.E.2d 982, ¶9.” Id. ¶1. The supreme court affirmed the judgment of the court of 

appeals dismissing Hazel’s petition in habeas corpus. 

{¶ 3} Davis is currently incarcerated. He states that the “Certificate of the 

Institutional Cashier” is attached to his affidavit seeking waiver of prepayment of the 

court’s filing fees and affidavit of indigency pursuant to R.C. 2969.25(C). A thorough 

review of the original affidavit and the copies filed with the court, however, reflects that 

Davis has not filed the R.C. 2969.25(C) cashier’s statement. As noted in Hazel, this 

defect requires dismissal of this action and cannot be cured by supplementing the 

complaint with the cashier’s statement later. 

{¶ 4} Accordingly, we dismiss this action sua sponte. Relator to pay costs. The 

clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry 

upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B). 

Complaint dismissed.
4

_______________________________ 

KENNETH A. ROCCO, JUDGE 

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, P.J., and 

MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR
#### ROCHELLE PARK P.B.A. LOCAL 102 v. TOWNSHIP OF ROCHELLE PARK.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6225-S6226]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             CLOTURE MOTION

  Mr. COVERDELL. Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under 
rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

                             Cloture Motion

       We the undersigned Senators in accordance with the 
     provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate 
     do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the pending 
     substitute amendment to H.R. 956, the product liability bill:
         Slade Gorton, Dan Coats, Richard G. Lugar, John Ashcroft, 
           Rod Grams, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Judd Gregg, Strom 
           Thurmond, Jay Rockefeller, Trent Lott, Rick Santorum, 
           Larry E. Craig, [[Page S6226]] Bob Smith, Don Nickles, 
           R.F. Bennett, John McCain, Connie Mack.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E910]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNIZING JOHN LINDL AND MICHAEL CAMBELL

                                 ______

                            HON. BILL BAKER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. BAKER of California. Mr. Speaker, for decades, Lawrence Livermore 
National Laboratory [LLNL] has made a decisive contribution to 
America's technological leadership. Our national security has been 
enhanced and our energy future made more promising because of the lab's 
remarkable efforts.
  Recently two of LLNL's most outstanding scientists, John Lindl and 
Michael Campbell, have been selected to receive the Department of 
Energy's prestigious E.O. Lawrence Award for their work in inertial 
confinement fusion. John Lindl is from my home town of Danville, while 
Michael Campbell hails from Livermore, also in the 10th Congressional 
District I am honored to represent.
  The Lindl-Campbell research may eventually lead to creation of a 
miniature star in the laboratory, and help in the development of fusion 
energy. Their research also may well lead to gains in nuclear 
nonproliferation efforts and in the monitoring of America's nuclear 
weapons stockpiles.
  The E.O. Lawrence Award is given for work in eight categories; Lindl 
and Campbell's was for work in the national security arena. I am 
pleased to recognize the superb work these scientists are doing on 
behalf of our security and our energy future, and would emphasize that 
the Lawrence Award once again proves the value of our national 
laboratories to our country.

                          ____________________
```
#### METZGER *v.*KELLY.

Appeals; Appealable Obdebs.

An order sustaining a demurrer to a petition, but not dismissing the petition, is interlocutory and therefore not appealable; and an appeal from such an order will be dismissed by this court on its own motion.

No. 2079.

Submitted February 15, 1910.

Decided March 1, 1910.

Hearing on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, of the District of Columbia sustaining a demurrer to an amended petition in a proceeding for an award of damages for the condemnation of certain buildings.

*Appeal dismissed.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. Victor H. Wallace*for the appellant.

*Mr. Edward II. Thomas,*Corporation Counsel, *Mr. William Henry White*for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from an order of the supreme court of the District of Columbia sustaining appellees’ demurrer to appellant’s second amended petition in a proceeding for' an award *549of damages for the condemnation of insanitary buildings in the District of Columbia. The order appealed from is as follows: “This cause coming on to he heard on demurrer to the second amended petition filed herein, and after argument by counsel and being considered by the court, it is, by the court, this 27th day of August, a. d. 1909, adjudged, ordered, and decreed that the said demurrer be and the same is hereby sustained. * * * From the foregoing decree, the complainant, in open court, notes an appeal to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, and the bond for costs is hereby fixed in the sum of one hundred ($100) dollars.”

This is a mere interlocutory order, sustaining a demurrer. No final judgment was entered in the court below; hence, the appeal is fatally defective. The practice is so uniform that an appeal will not lie from such an order, that discussion or citation of authority is unnecessary. No objection on this point was made by counsel, but the court, on its own motion, will notice such a patent defect in the record, and govern it? action accordingly. The appeal is dismissed, with costs, and it is so ordered. *Dismissed.*
Order entered October 14, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00519
- CV ESTER WILLIAMS, A HO LEE BAIL BONDS, Appellant
V. JOANN SEMPLE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 16
- 06177
- C



### O RDER On August 30, 2019, appellant filed a motion to extend time to file her brief asserting, in part, that the parties were attempting to settle their dispute. By order dated September 6, 2019, we directed appellant to file, no later than October 1, 2019, her opening brief, a status report concerning the parties’ settlement efforts, or a motion to dismiss the appeal

. To date, appellant has not complied

. Accordingl y, to ensure this appeal moves forward, we ORDER appellant’s opening brief be filed no later than November 1, 2019. We caution appellant that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARMELLO SANTIAGO.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40938

Summary Calendar

 

RAYMOND WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOB GREEN, in his official capacity as

Sheriff, Harrison County, TX.,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-32

- - - - - - - - - -

May 19, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The motion filed by Raymond Williams, Texas prisoner 

#745695, to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is GRANTED. 

Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), we

assess Williams an initial partial filing fee of $4.89. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Following payment of the initial partial

filing fee, the remainder will be deducted from Williams’s prison
No. 96-40938

- 2 -

trust-fund account until the entire filing fee of $105 is paid. 

§ 1915(b)(2). 

IT IS ORDERED that Williams authorize the appropriate prison

authorities having custody of Williams to forward the initial

partial filing fee to the Clerk of the District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas. Thereafter, the agency shall forward,

in accordance with § 1915(b)(2), to the Clerk of the District

Court for the Eastern District of Texas monthly payments of 20

percent of the preceding month’s income each time the amount in

Williams’s account exceeds $10, until the appellate filing fee of

$105 is paid. 

Regarding Williams’s challenge to the district court’s

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous, we have

reviewed Williams’s brief and the record and conclude that no

abuse of discretion occurred. See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9

(5th Cir. 1994). 

Williams’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED

as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). We caution Williams that future frivolous civil appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. Williams is cautioned further to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.b
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael L. Zapf

Michael L. ZapfAugust 14, 2009
 *
    
    This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.