alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      ( print page 55803)    
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory  Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease  Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

## Time and Date

8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 8, 2010 (Closed).

*Place:*                         Sheraton Gateway Hotel Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30337, Telephone: (770) 997-1100.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Epi-Centers for the Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infectious, Antimicrobial Resistance and Adverse Events, FOA CI11-001.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-22759 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              6,515,100
<SECURITIES>                                          630,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                          78,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    7,223,400
<PP&E>                                             19,239,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                      8,187,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     18,285,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,620,900
<BONDS>                                             9,433,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                          7,118,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       18,285,500
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,136,700
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         674,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       23,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       288,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                           14,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   273,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          273,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                              4.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            4.70



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mobile Vault, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A Amendment No. 1 for the year ending May 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Danielle Olsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mobile Vault, Inc., and will be retained by Mobile Vault, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ Danielle Olsen Danielle Olsen Chief Financial Officer February 27, 2013
___________

No. 95-3278

___________

David S. Cohen, as trustee for *

the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy *

estate of Norman E. Dyer, *

* Appeal from the United States 

Appellant, * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

v. *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Michael Snow, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 11, 1996

 Filed: October 17, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, LAY, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David S. Cohen, trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Norman E. Dyer,

appeals from the District Court's grant of summary judgment to defendant

Michael Snow. The court found that plaintiff failed to provide sufficient

evidence to establish the "but for" causation requirement of a legal

malpractice claim under Minnesota law. We have read all of the materials

submitted by the parties and have considered their arguments. We conclude

that the judgment of the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
condensed  consolidated  balance  sheet  at  December  31,  1999  and  condensed
consolidated  statement of  income for  the three months ended December 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000771790
<NAME>                        Steel Technologies Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           13,952
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    60,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (1,119)
<INVENTORY>                                      83,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                159,609
<PP&E>                                          184,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (73,890)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  301,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            60,729
<BONDS>                                         108,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         17,156
<OTHER-SE>                                      107,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    301,012
<SALES>                                         104,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                104,890
<CGS>                                            91,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    91,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,651
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .33




</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00491-CV

Frederick Barcase, Appellant

v.

Iriaquez Ironworks, LLC a/k/a Lakeway Ironworks, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY 

NO. 24-0068-C395, THE HONORABLE RYAN D. LARSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Frederick Barcase has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal without 

prejudice and requests that this Court reimburse him for the cost of the filing fee. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We deny his request for reimbursement but otherwise grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal without prejudice. See id.

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 29, 2024
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EARL RUBERTI, SR.

Dec. 10, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (10-019)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

# DATES:

Thursday, February 18, 2010, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. EST; Friday, February 19, 2010, 9 a.m.-1 p.m., EST.

# ADDRESSES:

NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20456, James E. Webb Auditorium.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Marla King, NAC Administrative Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, 202-358-1148.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

—NASA FY 2011 President's Budget Request.

—Reports from the Council Committees.

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Dated: January 29, 2010.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-2276 Filed 2-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00259-CR

James Arthur ANTHONY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR-2235

Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2009

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, James Arthur Anthony pled nolo contendere to

aggravated sexual assault and true to an enhancement offense and was sentenced to forty years

imprisonment in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On April 1, 2009, the trial

court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and
04-09-00259-CR

-2-

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Anthony filed a notice

of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See

id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been

filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by

written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by Anthony. See id. The

clerk’srecord does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate

that the trial court gave Anthony permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification,

therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Anthony does not have

a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right

of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d). 

We, therefore, warned Anthony that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that Anthony

had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1;

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended

trial court certification has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2913 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Wesley 

G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain 

Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL WESLEY G. DAVIDS AND 

4 CAPTAIN NICHOLAS J. ROZANSKI MEMORIAL 

5 POST OFFICE. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

7 Postal Service located at 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dub8 lin, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2913 IS

1 Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. 

2 Rozanski Memorial Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Wes7 ley G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial 

8 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

t0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

143193 

JOSEPH DUPRAS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143193 

 COA: 295130 

Marquette CC: 2008-046232-NO 

TIM LLOYD-LEE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: CONDEMNATION OF THE 

TOWNSHIP OF ROBINSON OF CERTAIN 

LANDS OWNED NOW OR FORMERLY 

OF: E&R PARTNERS, L.P., 82 FOREST 

GROVE ROAD CORAOPOLIS, PA 15108 

JAMES ESPOSITO 5852 STEUBENVILLE 

PIKE MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15136 (LOT & 

BLOCK 266-G-51) HUNTLEY AND 

HUNTLEY 2660 MONROEVILLE BLVD. 

MONROEVILLE, PA 15146 HERMAN 

EDWARDS 5852 STEUBENVILLE PIKE 

MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15136

PETITION OF: TOWNSHIP OF ROBINSON

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 190 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force to conduct focus groups on interpersonal violencePublished Oct. 21, 2020
                        
                        By   Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force will soon conduct focus groups with Total Force Airmen and Space Professionals about their experiences surrounding interpersonal violence.The focus groups are scheduled to begin the week of Oct. 26 and consist of interpersonal violence survey participants who volunteered to take part in small-group discussions.Interpersonal violence ranges from stalking and bullying to domestic violence, sexual assault and abuse.“Within the interpersonal violence survey, members could opt-in to take part in a limited amount of focus groups. These groups will help us understand our members’ perspectives surrounding interpersonal violence,” said **Brig. Gen. April Vogel**, director for manpower, personnel, recruiting and services at the National Guard Bureau, and the interpersonal violence task force lead. “Their voices are an imperative piece to determine if we are keeping our Airmen and Space Professionals safe when they face interpersonal violence.”The focus groups are part of an approach in which the focus-group data, survey data and data gathered from reviewing past cases involving interpersonal violence will be used to identify any themes or proposed areas for improvement.The survey portion concluded Oct. 9, and approximately 68,000 Total Force Airmen and Space Professionals participated, including civilians.“Thank you to everyone who took part in the survey. We know your time is very valuable. We explored multiple avenues to gather data and this survey was the most comprehensive way to initially reach the Total Force,” Vogel said. “Currently, the collected survey data is being analyzed by our experts, and we will begin to compile our findings.”A comprehensive review of the findings, to include both the focus group and survey data, is scheduled for early 2021.The task force stood up in July with the goal of exploring processes, programs and leadership actions associated with keeping Airmen and Space Professionals safe when faced with interpersonal violence situations. The task force will ultimately be developing recommendations for senior leadership review focused on improving Department of the Air Force policies, processes and actions in this area.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



DAF 



focus group 



interpersonal violence 



awareness 



survey 



review 



small group 



discussions 



readiness 



safety 



One Air Force 



bullying 



domestic violence 



total force
#### Jewell *v.*Floyd.

[No. 18,845.

Filed May 7, 1956.

Rehearing denied June 26, 1956.

Transfer denied January 25, 1957.]

*Edward A. Myerson*and *Alfred M. Loeser,*both of Chicago, Illinois, for appellant.

*Crumpaelcer, Gemberling & Enslen, Owen W. Crumpacker, Theodore M. Gemberling,*and *Lowell E. Enslen,*all of Hammond, for appellee.

Royse, C. J.

Appellant here seeks to appeal from a judgment of the Lake Superior Court against him in favor of appellee.

After appellant’s brief was filed in this court appellee filed his motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, affirm the judgment on the grounds that appellant’s brief does not comply with the Eules of the Supreme Court. This motion contains numerous specifications. In view of the conclusion we have reached, it is not necessary to discuss each specification.

Appellee’s motion asserted appellant had failed to cause notations to be made on the margin of each page of the transcript, as required by Eule 2-5. It further *192asserted appellant’s brief failed to comply with Rule 2-17 in five particulars.

Thereafter appellant filed his objections to the motion of appellee and sought our permission to make the marginal notes on the transcript. However, he did not offer or seek permission to amend appellant’s brief to overcome the failure to comply with Rule 2-17. Therefore, it would avail appellant nothing to grant his request to place marginal notes on the transcript.

Appellant’s brief does not disclose the nature of the action, what the issues were, and does not set out a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form, all as required by the last-mentioned Rule.

Under the heading “Statement of Fact” in about five pages of his brief, appellant gives his comment on the evidence with occasional quotes of such evidence.

Conceding without deciding that the Bill of Exceptions containing the evidence is properly in the record, appellant has failed to comply with the Rule in setting out the evidence in his brief.

While we always prefer to decide cases on their merits, we may not do so when an appellant fails to comply with the Rules, because the Rules of the Supreme Court are binding on the courts as well as the litigants. *Mendenhall v. Mendenhall*(1955), 125 Ind. App. 519, 124 N. E. 2d 873; *Witte*v. *Witte et al.*(1953), 123 Ind. App. 644, 113 N. E. 2d 166.

Since the only questions presented require a consideration of the evidence, the judgment must be affirmed.

Crumpacker, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 134 N. E. 2d 52.