alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 “I Have a Dream” still inspiringPublished Jan. 20, 2020
                        
                        By L. Cunningham
                        
                        
                        55th Wing Public Affairs
                **OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AFNS) --**
                “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’ ... I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”These words were spoken by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in his “I Have a Dream” speech in August, 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C.Dr. King Jr. was a Baptist minister, turned social activist and civil rights leader who called for civil and economic rights and an end to racism. In 1964, King was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize at the age of 35 for his work for civil rights and social justice. When first selected, he said the $54,123 prize would be given to further continue the civil rights movement.“All that I have said boils down to the point of affirming that mankind’s survival is dependent upon man’s ability to solve the problems of racial injustice, poverty and war: the solution of these problems is in turn dependent upon man squaring his moral progress with his scientific progress, and learning the practical art of living in harmony,” King said as part of his acceptance speech in Oslo, Norway.Dr. King Jr. was assassinated April 4, 1968 in Memphis, Tennessee, at the age of 39. He was to have led a protest march the next day in sympathy with garbage workers on strike.Twenty three years later in January 1986, this nation commenced the celebration of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a man who strove for freedom, justice and equality amongst all the people of this nation.In August 2011, a monument inspired by his “I Have a Dream” speech was unveiled in West Potomac Park, Washington, D.C. Dr. King Jr. was the first African American to be honored at the National Mall.King had a pivotal role in ending legal segregation of African-American citizens and prompting the creation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.Martin Luther King Jr. Day is a day to remember and commemorate a man who inspired this country to be a better nation.We continue this struggle to be better people every day. Some of us are still inspired by Dr. King’s message, his speeches, books and dreams; that one day, no matter the color of your skin, the fight for justice and equality will succeed.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Martin Luther King Jr. 



I have a dream 



Offutt AFB 



history 



civil rights leader 



MLK Day 



Freedom 



Unity 



one nation 



equality
News United States Air Force
 SecAF visits Pope Army AirfieldPublished July 20, 2020
                        
                        By James Bove
                        
                        
                        Air Mobility Command Public Affairs
                **POPE ARMY AIRFIELD, N.C. (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Barbara M. Barrett met with Pope Army Airfield Airmen July 16 to discuss joint operations and the integral part the Air Force plays during global responses.



Barrett met with the 43rd Air Mobility Squadron, 43rd Operations Support Squadron, 60th Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, 18th Air Support Operations Group and the 352nd Special Warfare Training Squadron. She recognized star performers and discussed diversity and inclusion with enlisted members and officers.



“U.S. Air andSpace Forces must be prepared to deter adversaries and defend our nation at a moment’s notice,” Barrett said. “The Airmen at Pope Army Airfield embrace a forward-looking mindset to achieve this goal.”



Pope Army Airfield is made up of squadrons spanning four different Air Force major commands:Air Mobility Command, **Air Combat Command**, **Air Education and Training Command** and Air Force Special Operations Command. Combined, they train, support, deliver and execute the Army Special Operations Forces’ mission worldwide at a moment’s notice. The Immediate Response Force relies heavily on interoperability to deploy within 18 hours of notification.



“Whether training with our Army partners and Special Forces units or refining aeromedical evacuation procedures to deliver world-class care in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, Pope Army Airfield is ready to operate anywhere, anytime,” Barrett said. “There is great comfort in knowing you’re on watch and ever-ready.”



In January, the first-ever IRF activated to combat Iranian aggression in what was the quickest deployment in 30 years. Last month, another IRF was ordered to Washington, D.C. as a precaution following multiple days of protests.



“We are thankful to Secretary Barrett for visiting Pope Army Airfield and recognizing the significant mission we deliver along with our mission partners across Fort Bragg,” said Col. Joe Vanoni, 43rd Air Mobility Operations Group commander. “It truly is a team effort and we remain willing, able and ready to execute our mission when called upon.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Barbara M. Barrett 



Pope Field 



ACC 



Air Combat Command 



joint operations 



global response 



diversity 



inclusion 



AMC 



Air Mobility Command 



AETC 



AFSOC 



Air Education and Training Command 



Air Force Special Operations Command 



IRF 



Immediate Response Force
Exhibit 31.2

CFO Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Karl J. Schmidt, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this special financial report on Form 10-K of Atkore International Holdings Inc.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this special financial report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this special financial report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: December 16, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Karl J. Schmidt                                                                                
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Karl J. Schmidt                                                                                       
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)
#### EMMANUEL C. MOTOMAL v. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE & DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
#### 800 KINGS HIGHWAY NORTH ASSOCIATES v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
condensed  consolidated  balance  sheet  at  March 31, 2000  and  condensed
consolidated  statement of  income for  the six months ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000771790
<NAME>                        Steel Technologies Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            9,787
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    71,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (1,238)
<INVENTORY>                                     105,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                189,125
<PP&E>                                          191,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (75,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  347,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            77,973
<BONDS>                                         134,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         17,258
<OTHER-SE>                                      108,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    347,471
<SALES>                                         120,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                120,910
<CGS>                                           106,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   106,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5,359
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,294
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .30




</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Jolly Green II, Apache complete joint test missionPublished June 3, 2020
                        
                        By  Samuel King Jr.
                        
                        
                        Eglin Air Force Base Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Those common, vibrating “thwip” helicopter sounds arrived well before they showed up, as 413th Flight Test Squadron personnel turned to look to the north at **Eglin Air Force Base**, May 19.
Seconds later, two helicopters appeared and the sounds and vibrations intensified. The Air Force’s newest combat search and rescue helicopter, the **HH-60W Jolly Green II**, led the way down the Duke Field runway. It was followed by the Army’s multi-role combat helicopter, the **AH-64 Apache**.
The two aircraft landed at Eglin AFB completing their first flight and combined test mission together.
The Apache, from Redstone Army Test Center, Alabama, flew in for system testing with the HH-60W.
“The unique configuration of the AH-64 Apache gave our team the opportunity to test capabilities of the HH-60W in ways normally not possible here,” said Christopher Martin, 413th FLTS HH-60W lead test engineer “Tests like these will ensure the Jolly Green II will be able to perform its critical combat search and rescue mission when fielded in the joint warfighting environment.”
The joint service test-effort marks another milestone in Jolly Green II's development. This year, the new helicopter has completed **extreme environment**, c**ommunications and defense system testing** just to name a few.
The 413th FLTS leads the HH-60W integrated test team along with members of Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 88th Test and Evaluation Squadron, Detachment 2, and **Air Force Operational Test Center**.
“We are very proud of the work our integrated test team accomplished in 2020 despite a myriad of operational restrictions due to **COVID-19**,” said Shawn Hammond, HH-60W test program manager. “The team’s success is due to a mission-focused mindset to ensure the crews flying the Jolly Green II into combat have the most reliable and capable helicopter for the job.”L/R 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Eglin AFB 



test flight 



AFTC 



Jolly green 



hh60w 



413th Flight Test Squadron 



duke field 



AH64 



Apache 



helicopter
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, inc. (the *“Company* ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”* ),
      I,
      Philip Jones, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
      respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 14, 2006








/s/Philip
      Jones


Philip
      Jones


Controller/Principal
      Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LYNN TILTON, §

§ No. 1 6 1 , 2017

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Court of Chancery of

§ the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 12946

ZOHAR II 2005

– 1, LIMITED and §

ZOHAR III, LIMITED, §

§

Plaintiffs Below

, §

Appellee s

. §

Submitted: April 18 , 201 7

Decided: April 1 9 , 201 7

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, and SEITZ

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 1 9 th day of April 2017

, having considered the appellant’s notice and

supplemental notice of appeal from interlocutory order and related motion s for stay

and to expedite, and the appellees’ motion to strike, it appears to the Court that:

(1) In a pending action filed under 8 Del. C. §§ 225 and 221, t he

defendant

- a

ppellant

, Lynn Tilton

, has petitioned this Court, under Supreme Court

Rule 42, to accept an interlocutory appeal and to stay the proceedings in the Court

of Chancery. The interlocutory order on appeal is an April 4, 2017 bench ruling

that denied Tilton’s motion to sever or stay certain equity ownership issues from2

the issues to be tried in the summary proceeding. Tilton contend s that the issues

are complex and beyond the bounds of such a proceeding

.

(2) The plaintiffs

- appellees filed an opposit ion to Tilton’s application for

certification and for a stay of the proceeding. By order dated April 17, 2017 and

docketed on April 18, 2 0 17, the Court of Chancery denied Tilton' s application for

certification and motion for stay.

( 3 ) A pplications for i nterlocutory review are addressed to the sound

discretion of th e Court 1 and are granted only in exceptional circumstances. 2 In this

case, the Court agrees with the Court of Chancery’s denial of Tilton’s application

for certification of an interlocutory ap peal

. The principles and criteria of Rule 42

do not weigh in favor of interlocutory review of the April 4 bench ruling denying

Tilton’s motion to stay or sever.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory

appeal is REFUSED. The motion to stay and motion to strike are moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

1 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).

2 Id. (b)(i)

– (iii).
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-218498) pertaining to the 2006 Share Plan and 2016 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Yatra Online,Inc. of our report dated June 30, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Yatra Online, Inc. included inthis Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended March 31, 2017.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young Associates LLP

Gurgaon, India

 

June 30, 2017
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                   AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany American Business Financial
Services, Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ending March 31, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying
the requirements of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I, Anthony J.
Santilli, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


                                                     Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 14, 2003
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ARTHUR SCOTT.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4553]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has examined the Journal of the 
last day's proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.
  Mr. JONES. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to clause 1, rule I, I demand a vote 
on agreeing to the Chair's approval of the Journal.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the Chair's approval of 
the Journal.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the ayes appeared to have it.
  Mr. JONES. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a 
quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum is not 
present.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 5, rule I, further 
proceedings on this vote will be postponed and the vote will be taken 
later today.
  The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.

                          ____________________
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 3, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50630

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURICIO JOE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-94-CR-73-ALL)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mauricio Joe Hernandez appeals the 24-month sentence imposed

upon revocation of supervised release, which stemmed from his 1994

conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. (The

revocation was based upon Hernandez’ drug use and withdrawal from

a drug treatment facility against the advice of the staff.)

Hernandez contends that the district court violated FED. R. CRIM.

P. 32(i)(3)(B) by failing to resolve a contested issue at

sentencing: whether Hernandez would be eligible for intensive drug
2

treatment in prison in the light of his former gang affiliation,

which could require his segregation from the regular prison

population.

The parties dispute: whether FED. R. CRIM. P. 32 required the

district court to make a finding on the availability of drug

treatment; and whether Hernandez preserved this issue by objecting

at sentencing. We need not resolve these contentions; even

deciding them in the light most favorable to Hernandez, the

sentence was proper. The sentencing transcript reflects that the

district court implicitly determined that this issue would not

affect sentencing. Hernandez has not demonstrated that the court

imposed a sentence in violation of law or that the sentence was

plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Stiefel, 207 F.3d 256,

259 (5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LUTHER F. ALSTON.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks 

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2010.  Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency that was declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat. 

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                        and transmitted to the Congress.                     

[FR Doc. 2010-22988

Billing code 3195-W0-P