alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 167 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 289 

[Report No. 113–89] 

To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local Development 

Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2013 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. ISAKSON, 

Mr. CARDIN, Mr. COWAN, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. KING, and Mr. JOHNSON of 

South Dakota) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Reported by Ms. LANDRIEU, with an amendment 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the 

Local Development Business Loan Program of the Small 

Business Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 289 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Real Es3 tate and Economic Development Act of 2013’’ or the 

4 ‘‘CREED Act of 2013’’. 

5 SEC. 2. LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING UNDER THE LOCAL 

6 DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS LOAN PROGRAM. 

7 (a) REPEAL.—Section 1122(b) of the Small Business 

8 Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 696 note) is repealed. 

9 (b) RESTORATION OF LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING

10 PROVISION.—Subparagraph (C) of section 502(7) of the 

11 Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 

12 696(7)) (relating to refinancing not involving expansions), 

13 as in effect on September 25, 2012, shall be in effect dur14 ing the period beginning on the date of enactment of this 

15 Act and ending 5 years after that date of enactment. on 

16 and after the date of enactment of this Act, in any fiscal 

17 year during which the cost to the Federal Government of 

18 making guarantees under section 502 of the Small Business 

19 Investment Act of 1958 is zero. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 167 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 289 

[Report No. 113–89] 

A BILL 

To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions 

Program of the Small Business Administration. under the Local Development Business Loan 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Reported with an amendment 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-5677

_____________________________

REGGIE JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

January 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Sharon Traxler, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of
First Rate Staffing Corporation. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:



The
Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   | /s/ Cliff Blake        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 30, 2014 |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00050-CR

The State of Texas

v.

Marlin Derrell York

§

§

§

§

§

§

From the 158th District Court

of Denton County (F-2011-0039-B)

May 9, 2013

Per Curiam

Dissent by Justice Dauphinot

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s 

order granting York’s motion to suppress is reversed and this case is remanded 

to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that the State shall pay all costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-4299SD

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of South Dakota. * Daniel Ross Schaeffer, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: May 13, 1998

Filed: May 21, 1998

_____________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judge.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Dani el Ross Schaeffer was convicted of conspiracy to distribut e methamphetamine. Schaeffer now appeals claiming (1) the district court committe d errorin refusing to suppress incriminating evidence seized during postarrest an d inventor ysearches of his motor vehicle, (2) the district court committed error i n admi tting certain evidence, (3) the district court committed error in refusing to giv e Scha effer's proposed entrapment and mistake of fact instructions, and (4) th e Government produced insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. Schaeffer also raises sev eral arguments about his sentence. After a review of the record and th e parties' submissions and oral argument, we conclude the district court correctly-2-

resolv ed each of Schaeffer's claims. Because the appeal involves the straightforward applic ation of settled principles of law, a discussion of the issues will serve no useful purpose. We are satisfied that no error of law appears and that none of the distric t court's sentence-related findings are clearly erroneous. We thus affirm Schaeffer' s conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### X-Cel Dairy, Inc., Appellant, *v.*City of Akron, Appellee.

(Decided October 9, 1939.)

*148
      *Messrs. Rockwell, Grant, Doolittle, Thomas (& Buckingham,*for appellant.

*Mr. Wade DeWoody,*director of law, and *Mr. Nathan Koplin,*for appellee.

Stevens, J.

This cáse is before this court as an appeal on questions of law. It concerns an attack upon the validity of a municipal ordinance prohibiting the sale of ice cream from any wagon, pushcart, or other vehicle, upon the public streets of the city of Akron.

The petition is in the form of a petition for a declaratory judgment. The trial court, after hearing upon the merits, vacated the interlocutory order of injunction theretofore issued by it and dismissed the plaintiff’s petition.

The record in the case contains no testimony, and incorporates only the very brief, and in some instances doubtful, admissions of counsel for the respective parties.

It is claimed by the plaintiff, appellant here, that the enforcement of the ordinance in question would accomplish an arbitrary and discriminatory classification, in that it forbids the use of the streets for the purpose of selling ice cream from vehicles, while at the same time it permits a like use to vendors of other articles.

The purpose of the council in the passage of the ordinance is asserted to have been the regulation of the streets, by the elimination of traffic hazards incident to citizens, especially children, rushing into the streets to purchase the ice cream offered for sale by plaintiff and others.

It is contended by plaintiff that like hazards pertain from the sale of other articles from vehicles in the streets, and that the singling out of ice cream vendors amounts to an unjust and unreasonably discriminatory classification.

*149The record is entirely silent as to the existence of hazards incident to the sale, from vehicles in the public streets, of articles other than ice cream, and this court cannot take judicial notice of the existence of such other hazards.

Mr. Justice Holmes, in *Central Lumber Co.*v. *State of South Dakota,*226 U. S., 157, 57 L. Ed., 164, 33 S. Ct., 66, stated:

“* * * the Legislature * * * may direct its law against what it deems the evil as it actually exists without covering the whole field of possible abuses, and.it may do so none the less that the forbidden act does not differ in kind from those that are allowed.”

The rule so announced has been stated and followed by the Supreme Court of Ohio, as indicated in the opinion of the trial court.

After an examination of the claims made by counsel for the respective parties, this court, for the reasons set forth and upon the authorities cited in the finding of the trial court, and upon other authorities examined by us, vacates and sets aside the temporary restraining order heretofore issued by this court, and affirms the judgment of the trial court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

"Washburn, P. J., and Doyle, J., concur.
#### LILA KAPLAN v. ELBERT A. KAPLAN.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: March 10Published March 10, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, pilots eject from an A-29A Super Tucano and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein speaks about the importance of the space and cyber mission. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller.
For previous episodes, click here.	
Related stories:
- Pilots eject from A-29A Super TucanoCSAF 



space 



Moody AFB 



cyber 



ACC 



A-29 



ATAF
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1984

RUFUS JULIUS ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. A. PIPER ROOFING CO.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:21-cv-02901-DCC)

Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1984 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Julius Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting Defendant 

summary judgment on Anderson’s employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant to

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; and the 

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, and denying 

Anderson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order denying Anderson Rule 59(e) relief on April 13, 

2023, and mailed a physical copy of the order to Anderson on June 1, 2023. Anderson 

filed the underlying notice of appeal on September 18, 2023. Because Anderson failed to 

file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, 

we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1984 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Melvin Shawn Payne

, * From the 39 th District Court

of Throckmorton County,

Trial Court No. 1230

.

Vs. No. 11

- 17

- 00344

- CR * August 9 , 2018

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed . Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WALTER BRAND, III.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2926 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in the State of Rhode 

Island. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton 

Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in the State of Rhode Island. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this section, the term 

6 ‘‘Map’’ means the map that— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2926 IS

1 (1) is subtitled ‘‘Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, 

2 Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI– 

3 06, Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’; 

4 (2) is included in the set of maps entitled 

5 ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sys6 tem’’ (referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Bar7 rier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) as the set 

8 of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources Sys9 tem’’); and 

10 (3) relates to certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

11 Barrier Resources System units in the State of 

12 Rhode Island. 

13 (b) REPLACEMENT.—The Map is replaced by the 

14 map entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

15 System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit 

16 RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach 

17 Unit RI–07’’ and dated September 30, 2009. 

18 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

19 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

20 (b) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

21 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

22 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Chaplaincy brings VR to Agile Flag 21-1

              - Published  Nov. 4, 2020
              -                             By Senior Airman Andrew Kobialka                                                    
              - 366th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --  **
Living in tents, beaten down by the sun, working long hours and on top of all that, imagine being separated from family. Sometimes that’s the reality for Airmen on deployment.

 

It isn’t all that bad, as long as the chaplains are around.

 

Capt. Brent Little, 366th Fighter Wing chaplain and religious affairs Airman, Tech. Sgt. Anthony Bean, participated in exercise Agile Flag 21-1,Oct. 21-29, at **Tyndall Air Force Base**, where their role is very similar to what it would be deployed.

 

“We offer spiritual care to whoever wants it,” Little said. “We know it’s hot out here and everyone’s working hard, so we want to fill any need we can.”

 

Agile Flag 21-1, the first exercise of its kind, is an experimental exercise that tests a new lead wing command design for deployed environments. Naturally, this comes with stress and frustration. The chaplaincy aims to combat that by strengthening Airmen’s minds, bodies and souls while in that environment.

 

“We got a snack shack, a massage chair, counseling area and coffee,” Little said.

 

They are also using this opportunity to try new ways of taking care of Airmen. The most notable is implementation of virtual reality as a resiliency tool for Airmen.

 

“In VR, Airmen can meditate, go fishing, fly through space, enjoy walking in nature or (have) hundreds of other engaging experiences,” Bean said. “Solo VR experiences build resiliency and provide an intuitive platform for engagement and interaction which is critical to overcoming what our wing chaplain, Lt. Col. Joshua Payne, affectionately calls ‘the tyranny of distance.’”

 

The chapel purchased 30 VR sets to follow Airmen on deployments in a hope to bring some semblance of home.

 

“We had an Airman on deployment who was a father,” Bean said. “He was having a tough time because the timing of the deployment made him miss his annual fishing trip with his son. He put on the VR set to do some virtual fishing. A few moments later he began to tear up ... the fishing hole looked exactly like the one he goes to with his son. He said that gave him the drive to keep going so he can make it home to his son.”

 

The thoughtful and caring work of the 366th FW chaplaincy continually brings genuine connection, smiles and resiliency to the mission, mostly in part because of the personal character of Little and Bean.

 

“I’m called to be a helper,” Little said. “I try to do that by walking with people through this journey of life. Whether it’s high or low, we are fellow Airmen. (Tech.) Sgt. Bean and I try to have that mentality as we walk with people.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir Forceagile flag 21-1chaplainVirtual Reality366th Fighter WingMountain Home Air Force BaseTyndall Air Force Baseresiliency toolAir Combat CommandACC
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force makes additional updates to dress and appearance regulationsPublished Sept. 29, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                As part of the ongoing effort to build a more inclusive Air and **Space Force**, additional revisions were approved Sept. 15 to **Air Force Instruction 36-2903, “Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel,”** which are effective immediately.Following the Department of the Air Force’s initial review, a diverse panel of Total Force Airmen completed a second review of Air Force grooming and appearance guidance in order to enhance inclusiveness while maintaining Department of the Air Force professional standards.The changes are as follows:• Clarification that the authorization to dye hair to natural colors applies to all Airmen regardless of natural born hair color. Examples of natural hair colors are brown, blonde, brunette, natural red, black or grey.• Men’s hair bulk standard was increased from 11⁄4 inches to 2 inches.• Men’s hair may have one (cut, clipped or shaved) front to back, straight-line part, not slanted or curved, on either side of their head, above the temple. Part will not exceed 4 inches length or 1⁄4 inch width.• Women’s hair bulk standard was increased from 31⁄2 inches to 4 inches.For more information, service members should view Air Force Guidance Memorandum 2020-02 and check Air Force Instruction 36-2903 for updates, which are available on the public website of the Air Force’s Personnel Center at **https://www.afpc.af.mil/Career-Management/Dress-and-Appearance/**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFI 36-2903 



Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel 



total force 



personal grooming 



haircut 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



AFPC 



hair color 



hair length
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2979 

To extend eligibility for hospital care, medical services, and nursing home 

and domiciliary care for certain veterans who served in a theater of 

combat operations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2014 

Mr. WALSH (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend eligibility for hospital care, medical services, and 

nursing home and domiciliary care for certain veterans 

who served in a theater of combat operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2979 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR HOSPITAL 

2 CARE, MEDICAL SERVICES, AND NURSING 

3 HOME AND DOMICILIARY CARE FOR CERTAIN 

4 VETERANS WHO SERVED IN A THEATER OF 

5 COMBAT OPERATIONS. 

6 Section 1710(e)(3)(A) of title 38, United States 

7 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘period of five years’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘period of 10 years’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E967]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HONORING DR. PHILIP SEGAN

                                 ______

                          HON. ELIOT L. ENGEL

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, On May 7, 1995 Dr. Philip Segan will be 
honored at the Student Sponsorship Breakfast to be held by the 
Riverdale Temple.
  It has been noted that most of the significant life cycle events in 
Dr. Segan's adult life are connected to the Riverdale Temple. It is 
rare that we find someone so committed to his community and his 
religious ideals.
  Dr. Segan has served as co-president of the Parents' Association and 
then as chairperson of the schools committee. But Dr. Segan's work with 
the temple did not stop when his children grew up. He went on to become 
temple vice president and then in 1990 became the temple's 18th 
president--a number with great significance in Judaism.
  Dr. Segan and his family have also worked with indigent families in 
the surrounding community through the Kingsbridge, Riverdale, Marble 
Hill Food and Hunger Project. Now a former Schools Committee 
chairperson, still an active member, and past president of the temple, 
Dr. Segan remains actively involved in social and educational causes 
both in the temple and the community.
  I join with Dr. Segan's family, friends and fellow temple members in 
congratulating him on this honor.

                          ____________________
```