alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Nov. 29Published Nov. 29, 2017
                        
                        By Hosted by Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) – On this look around the Air Force combined forces bomb Taliban drug labs, the investigation of 2015 MQ-1B crash has concluded, and SMART scholarship opportunities for students are available. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- MQ-18 accident investigation released
- Strikes target Taliban drug labs: 455th AEW plays key role
- SMART Scholarship Program looks to attract future scientists, engineersATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



air strikes 



Crash Investigation 



SMART Scholarships 



SSgt Anastasia Tompkins 



Taliban 



Drug Labs 



stem 



455th AEW
News United States Air Force
 AFMC releases updated strategic planPublished July 15, 2020
                        
                        By Marisa Alia-Novobilski
                        
                        
                        Air Force Materiel Command
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The **Air Force Materiel Command** has released an updated strategic plan identifying four key focus areas as the organization continues to ensure the Air and Space Forces remain ready to fly, fight and win today and into the future.
“AFMC built the most powerful Air Force in the world and our nation still depends on us to build and power the Air Force of the future,” states **Gen. Arnold W. Bunch Jr.**, AFMC Commander, in the foreword. “Our adversaries have eroded our technological advantage and have presented us with new challenges and opportunities. We must operate at the speed of relevance to counter these threats and develop, deliver, support and sustain the most lethal and ready Air Force in the world.”
In addition to identifying a refreshed command mission and vision statement, the plan identifies four key lines of effort aimed at ensuring the command can meet the needs of the National Defense Strategy today and into the future. These four LOEs focus on: readiness and lethality; delivery with disciplined speed; strengthening the AFMC team; and fostering trusted connections. Each LOE contains specific objectives designed to guide AFMC teams to meet the shared vision identified in the strategy.
The new plan also includes a specific objective to address diversity, equality and inclusion under AFMC’s LOE 3: Strengthen Our Team, aimed at ensuring the command attracts, develops and retains diverse Airmen and maintains a culture and climate where all can thrive.
To view the complete strategic plan, visit: **AFMC Strategic Plan**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



space force 



AFMC 



Air Force Materiel Command 



update 



Strategic Plan 



NDS 



National Defense Strategy
No. 12,519.

#### Webb et al. *v.*Simpson et al.

Filed Feb. 13, 1886.

*Appeal.*— Time.—Decedents’ *Estates.*— Proceeding *to Set Aside Final Report of Administrator.*— An appeal from the judgment in a proceeding to set aside the final report of an administrator is governed by sections 2454 and 2455, R. S. 1881, relating to decedents’ estates, and must be taken •within the time there provided.

From the Orange Circuit Court.

*J. H. Stotsenburg*and *W. Farrell,*for appellants.

*J. W. Bushirk, H. C. Duncan*and *J. F. Pittman,*for appellees.

Elliott, J. —

The appellants petitioned the court below to set aside a final report made by the administratrix of the estate of Mary Lane, deceased, but, upon a hearing, that court ruled against them. The judgment was rendered on the 5th day of June, 1885, but the transcript was not filed in this court until the 17th day of August. On the 11th day of October, the appellees appeared and moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that as the case is governed by sections 2454 and 2455, R. S. 1881, the appeal was not taken in time. This motion must be sustained. The case is not governed by the general rule regulating appeals, but is governed by the provisions of the statute referred to. *Yearley*v. *Sharp,*96 Ind. *469; Browning*v. *McCracken,*97 Ind. 279; *Miller*v. *Carmichael,*98 Ind. 236; *Rinehart*v. *Vail,*103 Ind. 159, and authorities cited.

Whether the appellants can have an appeal granted upon a proper showing is not the question before us, and we give no opinion upon it, but confine our decision to the motion to dismiss the appeal, as that must, at all events, be sustained.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1005-E1006]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      PASSAIC HIGH SCHOOL INDIANS

                                 ______

                        HON. WILLIAM J. MARTINI

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 11, 1995
  Mr. MARTINI. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to 
commemorate one of the greatest high school basketball teams of all 
time, the 1919-25 Passaic High School Indians. Over that 6-year 
stretch, the Indians enjoyed the longest winning streak ever for a high 
school, college, or professional team. They won an incredible 159 games 
in a row.
  From December 17, 1919, to February 6, 1925, Passaic High was 
unbeatable. In an era of low-scoring basketball, they outscored their 
opponents by an average of 39 points, topping 100 points a dozen times. 
They once crushed an opponent 145 to 5.
  While these teams were blessed with great players, such dominance 
transcends individual stars and usually begins with the coach. It was 
Prof. Ernest Blood that led the charge for these young men for so many 
years. Blood began playing basketball just a year after it was 
invented, and soon after he stopped playing he was coaching. In 
Potsdam, NY, his high school team did not lose to another high school 
team from 1906 to 1915.
  A move to Passaic. NJ, in 1918 brought him to the job that would make 
him famous. Although his first season was marred by a defeat in the 
State championship, the streak began on the first day of the 1919 
season. Win after win turned into State championship after State 
championship. As the streak progressed, the team became the center of 
attention for this industrial city: A factory whistle would indicate 
the results of the game, two loud blasts for a win, one long blast for 
a loss. Blood's foresight and desire kept the team ahead of its time, 
and he eventually led them [[Page E1006]] to five consecutive 
undefeated seasons, 147 games in all.
  Blood left after the 1923-24 season, but the streak continued well 
into the next season, finally coming to an end in a 39 to 35 defeat at 
the hands of Hackensack High on February 6, 1925. It had been 159 games 
since the Indians had experienced a defeat, and the magnitude of their 
accomplishments did not go unnoticed. Coach Blood was the third coach 
ever elected to the Basketball Hall of Fame, and one of the team's 
greatest stars, Johnny Roosma, was also accorded that honor.
  And to this day, the wonder teams of Passaic High are enjoying much-
deserved accolades. On May 18 of this year, they will be inducted into 
the Sports Hall of Fame of New Jersey. Congratulations to the families 
and friends of all of those connected with these special athletes. 
Their accomplishments are rightly being enshrined into the memory of 
our great State, and memorialized for basketball fans across the 
country.

                          ____________________
```
#### DORIS MEAD T/A PARK TERRACE APARTMENTS v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied. (See 170 *N.J.Super.*167)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Phillip Frost, M.D., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IVAX Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2951 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs is informed of the interment of deceased veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs is informed of the interment of deceased veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Dignified 

5 Burial Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2951 IS

1 SEC. 2. INFORMATION CONCERNING SCHEDULED INTER2 MENTS OF VETERANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 24 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section: 

6 ‘‘§ 2415. Information concerning scheduled inter7 ments 

8 ‘‘(a) SCHEDULED INTERMENT.—(1) At the same 

9 time that the Secretary confirms to a covered entity the 

10 veteran status of a deceased veteran in the custody of the 

11 covered entity, the Secretary shall request from the cov12 ered entity the specific date of the scheduled interment 

13 of the deceased veteran. 

14 ‘‘(2) During each 30-day period following the date of 

15 a request made under paragraph (1) concerning a de16 ceased veteran, the Secretary shall repeat such request 

17 until the date on which the covered entity confirms to the 

18 Secretary that the deceased veteran has been interred. 

19 ‘‘(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—(1) Not later than January 

20 31 of each year, the Secretary shall submit to the Com21 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Com22 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representa23 tives a report on deceased veterans who were interred after 

24 the 30-day period following the date on which the Sec25 retary made a request under subsection (a). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2951 IS

1 ‘‘(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) 

2 shall include the following: 

3 ‘‘(A) During the year prior to the year in which 

4 the report is submitted, the number of deceased vet5 erans who were not interred during the period de6 scribed in paragraph (1), including the covered enti7 ty that had custody of each deceased veteran. 

8 ‘‘(B) The number of such deceased veterans 

9 who, as of the date of the report, are not yet in10 terred, including the covered entity that has custody 

11 of each deceased veteran. 

12 ‘‘(c) COVERED ENTITY DEFINED.—In this section, 

13 the term ‘covered entity’ means a local medical examiner, 

14 funeral director, county service group, or other similar en15 tity.’’. 

16 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

17 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

18 after the item relating to section 2414 the following new 

19 item: 

‘‘2415. Information concerning scheduled interments.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2011-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
   
  
 /s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 146 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6509]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United States submitting a treaty 
and sundry nominations which were referred to the appropriate 
committees.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             557                     557
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,118                   1,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (265)                   (265)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,569                   3,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,015                   6,015
<PP&E>                                           1,611                   1,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,018)                 (1,018)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,632                   6,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,605                   6,605
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,344                   2,344
<COMMON>                                        10,325                  10,325
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,664)                (12,664)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,632                   6,632
<SALES>                                          (521)                   6,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 (521)                   6,060
<CGS>                                              328                   4,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      328                   4,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,590                   6,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 182                     190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,621)                 (4,813)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,621)                 (4,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,621)                 (4,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)                  (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)                  (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States to Congress.

Time and Place: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. The 
meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 
811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

Agenda: Agenda items include a legislative update and Bank response to 
the recommendations made by the Advisory Committee to the 
Competitiveness Report to Congress.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation, 
and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or 
comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) 
before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be 
presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the 
building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be placed on an attendee 
list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language 
interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to 
September 14, 2010, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3232 or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b080e081a155513140e081e093b1e031216551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88fbfdfbe9e6a6e0e7fdfbedfac8edf0e1e5a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Susan 
Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 
565-3232.

Jonathan Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22383 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>