alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, John C. Regan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDG Environmental, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report. 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (i) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By                                                   /s/ John C. Regan    John C. Regan    Chief Executive Officer   Date: June 13, 2007
23
#### Richard LARA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 97-10034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 7, 1998.

Richard Lara, Kenedy, TX, pro se.

Idolina Garcia, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REYNALDO G. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing on behalf of Richard Lara, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED-IN-PART as is the Petition for Rehearing of Gary L. Johnson, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, as stated further below. No member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc filed by the Appellant, Richard Lara, the Suggestion for Rehearing En Bane in his behalf is DENIED.

Both the appellant and Appellee have called our attention to an error in the prior opinion with regards to Footnote 3 of the opinion. Footnote 3 is hereby revised from:

> Lara originally alleged that his rights to a speedy trial under the IAD were violated by Texas and California. On appeal, he only alleges this claim against Texas. Failure to brief an issue on appeal constitutes waiver. *Koetting,*995 F.2d at 38 n. 1.

Instead it will read:

> Lara originally alleged that his rights to a speedy trial under the IAD were violated by Texas and California. On appeal, he only alleges this claim against California. Failure to brief an issue on appeal constitutes waiver. *Koetting,*995 F.2d at 38 n. 1.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of FS Investment Corporation II



|                                               |  |                                       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                             |  | State of Incorporation or Organization
|Cobbs Creek LLC                                |  | Delaware                              
|Cooper River LLC                               |  | Delaware                              
|Darby Creek LLC                                |  | Delaware                              
|Del River LLC (formerly IC-II Investments LLC) |  | Delaware                              
|FSIC II Investments, Inc.                      |  | Delaware                              
|IC II American Energy Investments, Inc.        |  | Delaware                              
|Lehigh River LLC                               |  | Delaware                              
|Wissahickon Creek LLC                          |  | Delaware                              
|Dunning Creek LLC                              |  | Delaware                              
|Juniata River LLC                              |  | Delaware                              
|Green Creek LLC                                |  | Delaware                              
|Schuylkill River LLC                           |  | Delaware
News United States Air Force
 AF releases results of CY17A medical, dental central selection boardsPublished Jan. 4, 2018
                        
                        By  Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 556 active-duty officers for promotion to colonel, lieutenant colonel and major during the calendar year 17A Medical and Dental Corps central selection boards.
 
The boards selected 62 lieutenant colonels for promotion to colonel, 138 majors for promotion to lieutenant colonel and 356 captains for promotion to major.
To view the lists, go to myPers from a CAC-enabled computer, select “Active Duty Officer” from the drop down menu, search “Promotions Home” and scroll down to the promotion select lists.

Prior to posting the list on myPers, the Air Force’s Personnel Center provided senior raters with advanced knowledge of their officers’ selection to allow notification through the chain of command.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Eligible individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.medical 



officer 



promotion 



selection 



dental 



captain 



lieutenant colonel 



major 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



AFPC
[No. 24216-8-II.

Division Two.

May 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joaquin Mendez-Carino, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 95-1-00036-2, Kenneth D. Williams, J., entered December 11, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Houghton, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22573]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(515) 564-6638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Tuesday, October 26, 2010, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan 
Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-
1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 
5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22573 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             157                     157
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      148                     148
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (23)                    (23)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,181                   1,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,522                   1,522
<PP&E>                                             890                     890
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (671)                   (671)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,764                   1,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,834                   7,834
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        727                     727
<COMMON>                                        11,406                  11,406
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,209)                (18,209)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,764                   1,764
<SALES>                                            593                   2,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   593                   2,482
<CGS>                                              575                   2,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      575                   2,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   647                   2,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7                      77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (636)                 (2,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (636)                 (2,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (636)                 (2,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)                  (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
[No. 44755-6-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### Charles Thompson, *Appellant,*v. The Boeing Company, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-10695-6, Linda Lau, J., entered April 19, 1999. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Kennedy and Appelwick, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Rosenbarger, a Child, etc.

[No. 19,032.

Filed June 19, 1957.]

*Scott Ging, LaFuse, Ging & Grdber,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Eugene M. Fife, Jr.,*of Indianapolis, for appellee.

IN THE MATTER OF LARRY EDWIN ROSENBARGER, a child under the age of 18 years.

No. 19,032

Comes now the appellant and shows the court that it appears on the face of the record in this appeal that the petition to have the said Larry Edwin Rosenbarger made a ward of the Juvenile Court of Marion County, Indiana, was not signed by the probation officer of said court and thus the formal jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action was not acquired by the Juvenile Court of Marion County. This court said in *Shupe*v. *Bell*(1957), 127 Ind. App. 292, 141 N. E. 2d 351: “Under the acts of 1954 the legislative intent that to acquire formal jurisdiction of the subject matter it is necessary for the petition to be filed by the probation officer under the order of the said Juvenile Court.” This was said in connection with a petition to make a minor child a ward of the Juvenile Court, Elkhart *498County, Indiana, and under the authority of that case the judgment herein is reversed and the trial court is directed to set aside its judgment making said Larry Edwin Rosenbarger a ward of that court.

H. L. Crumpacker Chief Judge

Note. — See Supreme Court opinion transferring cause reported in 141 N. E. 853.

(Not unofficially reported)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting cancellation.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces cancellation of an open meeting of the Ultra Deepwater Advisory Committee. The Committee was organized pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) (the Act). This notice is provided in accordance with the Act.

# DATES:

This notice is to cancel the meeting that was to be held on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting being cancelled was to be held at: Sugar Land Marriott Town Square, 16090 City Walk, Sugar Land, Texas 77479-6539.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Oil and Gas, Washington, DC 20585; telephone (202) 586-5600. Additional information will be available at                         *http://fossil.energy.gov/​programs/​oilgas/​advisorycommittees/​UltraDeepwater.html.*

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 3, 2010.

Carol A. Matthews,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-22540 Filed 9-3-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BERNARD BROWN.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2965 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2965

   To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing hazardous 
 humanitarian services in West Africa to combat the spread of the 2014 
  Ebola virus outbreak shall be entitled to tax benefits in the same 
      manner as if such services were performed in a combat zone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2014

   Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing hazardous 
 humanitarian services in West Africa to combat the spread of the 2014 
  Ebola virus outbreak shall be entitled to tax benefits in the same 
      manner as if such services were performed in a combat zone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Operation United Assistance Tax 
Exclusion Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HAZARDOUS HUMANITARIAN SERVICE AS COMBAT 
              ZONE SERVICE FOR PURPOSES OF THE COMBAT ZONE COMPENSATION 
              EXCLUSION.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 112 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, service by a qualified member of the Armed Forces 
during Operation United Assistance shall be treated as service in a 
combat zone in the same manner as if the President of the United States 
had by Executive order designated the Ebola virus disease outbreak area 
as an area of combat under section 112(c)(2) of such Code.
    (b) Definitions.--
            (1) Qualified member of the armed forces.--The term 
        ``qualified member of the Armed Forces'' means a member of the 
        Armed Forces serving in Operation United Assistance who is 
        required to undergo a program of not less than 21 days of 
        controlled monitoring in a controlled monitoring area upon the 
        individual's return from the Ebola virus disease outbreak area.
            (2) Operation united assistance.--The term ``Operation 
        United Assistance'' means the mission beginning in September 
        2014 in the Ebola virus disease outbreak area.
            (3) Ebola virus disease outbreak area.--The term ``Ebola 
        virus disease outbreak area'' means Liberia, Sierra Leone, and 
        Guinea, and any other region designated by the Centers for 
        Disease Control and Prevention as experiencing a widespread 
        Ebola virus disease outbreak as of the date of the enactment of 
        this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



March 16, 2020



Via EDGAR



Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Annual Report of
Permianville Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely
as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The above certification is furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.



|The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Trustee for Permianville Royalty
    Trust |                                 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|                                                                                            |                                 
|By:                                                                                         | /s/ SARAH NEWELL                
|                                                                                            | Sarah Newell                    
|                                                                                            | Vice President and Trust Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 73 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6189]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    ORDER FOR RECESS UNTIL TOMORROW

  Mr. DOLE. If there is no further business to come before the Senate, 
I now ask unanimous consent that the Senate stand in recess under the 
previous order following the remarks of Senator Specter, who I 
understand is on the way to the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. DOLE. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```