alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Barlow *versus*The Eagle Fire Ins. Co. of the City of New-York.

Oct. Term, 1828.

Taxation of costs. Preliminary proofs, in an insurance cause, are not to be taxed in the plaintiff’s bill of costs.

The plaintiff cannot charge for *drafting fas*many’suipceitos as he has witnesses : but must prepare one draft, and from that engross the others.

The attorney for the plaintiff in this cause, in preparing his bill of costs, charged for drafts and copies of the affidavits of five different persons, whose testimony was necessary to establish the preliminary proofs of the plaintiff, and also for administering the oaths. He likewise charged for the notarial certificate, copy and Seal, together with inventories to be annexed thereto, and copies to be served: and also for the draft of a separate *subpoena*for each witness summoned, and for engrossing copies for each *subpaena*These items being contested on the taxation, it was submitted to the court to decide, whether they were taxable, and to what extent.

*154* *Mr. Anthon,*for the plaintiff, contended,

j That the preliminary proofs were *necessary proceedings*in the cause, and therefore taxable. In *Corlies v. Cummings*[7 *Co*we*n,*157.] the Supreme Court considered the words of the fee bill as entitled to a more liberal interpretation than was given to them in the case of *Kenny v. Van Horn,*[2 *John. R.*107.] the statute being broader than the act on which that decision was founded. That the preliminary proofs are proceedings in the cause, within the meaning of the act, was evident from the fact, that they are to be produced at the trial, and the judge is to pass his opinion upon their sufficiency.

II. That each *subpoena*under the seal of the court is a new writ, and taxable as such. It was not the mere engrossing of a prior writ: for each *subpoena*requires anew *praecipe,*and a new seal, and all the power over the witnesses named therein was derived from the *indentical writ,*and not from any prior writ, of which it is supposed to be an engrossed copy. That Iherefore every new *subpoena,*required in the cause, was taxable as a new writ.

The *Court,*

however, disallowed all the items relative to the preliminary proofs ; but permitted the plaintiff to charge for drafting and engrossing one *subpoena,*and for *engrossing*one copy, to he sealed for every four witnesses.

[Edward Anthon, *Atty. for*J. O. Grim, *Atty. for deft.]*
NUMBER	Viatar CTC Solutions Inc.	SHARES
	CERT.9999	 	*****9,000,000*****


 





	 	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE	 
	 	$0.001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK	COMMON STOCK







  


	THIS CERTIFIES THAT	GEI GLOBAL ENERGY CORP.


 


	Is The Owner of	*NINE MILLION*


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK OF


Viator CTC Solutions Inc.


 


Transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or
by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned
by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.


 


Dated:        JANUARY 01, 2009


 


	COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:	 	 
	VSTOCK TRANSFER, LLC	 	 
	Transfer Agent and Register	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 
	 	AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE	 	PRESIDENT
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JESSE L. YOUNGB LOOD, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. 5 UNKNOW

N C IM C ORRE C TIONAL OFFIC E R S, De fe nda

nts-Appe lle e s. No. 14-55098 D.C . No. 5:11-c v-01625-JAK-E M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia John A. Kronstadt, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, a

nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. Je sse L. Youngblood, a

C a lifornia

sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging c rue l a nd unusua l punishm e nt. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w for 

# FIL ED MAR 03 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).an a

b use of disc re tion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th C ir. 2002) (dism i ssa l for fa ilure to c om ply with a c ourt orde r); He rnande

z v . C ity of El Monte , 138 F.3d 393, 398 (9th C ir. 1998) (dismissa l for fa ilure to prose c ute ). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

dism i ssing Youngblood’ s a c tion without pre

judic e be c a

use Youngblood wa s give n le ave to c onduc t disc ove ry in orde r to e ffe c t se rvic e , but he fa ile d to c om ply with a c ourt orde r to provide the Unite d State s M arsha ls Se rvic e with suffic ie nt inform ation to serve the de fe nda n ts in this ac tion. Se e Pagtalunan , 291 F.3d a t 642 (se tting forth fa c tors for a distric t c ourt to c onside r in de te rm ining whe the r to dismi ss for fa ilure to c om ply with a c o urt orde r or fa ilure to prose c ute ); se e also Ash v . C v e tk ov , 739 F.2d 493, 497 (9th C i r. 1984) (“ [D] ism issa l without pre j udic e is a

m o re e a sily

justifie d sa nc tion for fa i lure to prose c ute .” ). AFFIRM E D .

1 4 - 5 5 0 9 8 2
News United States Air Force
 Vice Chief of Staff reinforces Air Force’s commitment to Airmen, families at MCEC seminarPublished July 25, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Rusty Frank
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Stephen W. Wilson and his wife, Nancy Wilson, reinforced the Air Force’s commitment to Airmen and their families at the Military Child Education Coalition National Training Seminar, Washington, D.C., July 24, 2018.
“I tell people there is not a more touchstone issue for military families than the education of their children,” the general said. 
The vast majority of Air Force children are educated through state or local public education systems and districts. As such, the quality of local public education supporting Air Force installations directly affects family choices concerning retention.
Recognizing that choice, the Air Force has placed an emphasis on school-age dependent education, recommending that the quality of local public schools be considered in future basing decisions.
“[One of the areas that is] really important to our secretary, is the education of our kids,” VCSAF Wilson said.
The Air Force is committed to building and nurturing strong community partnerships to support military-connected children’s education.
Mrs. Wilson said, just as it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a community to make the education of military children a priority.
As part of that community, MCEC aims to empower parents and other supporting adults with the knowledge needed to ensure military-connected children are college, workforce and life-ready.
The general emphasized the workforce of the future will need STEM expertise, innovative mindsets and strong character.
“We are in competition,” he said. “What is going to help us win is our education system and our young people going forward. We want an education system that challenges our young folks to think differently and to understand the why behind the how, and then to implement those tools and make our nation great.”Air Force vice chief of staff 



education 



Military Child Coalition National Training Seminar 



VCSAF 



children 



community partnerships 



Military children 



stem 



innovation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                     262,027
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           266,293   
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             266,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,579 
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     6,554
<OTHER-SE>                                 195,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               266,293 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,991
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,591) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                             (11,591)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,591) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
                               

</TABLE>
Air Force stands up new division to enhance customer service for EFMP families By Toni Whaley,   Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs / Published July 01, 2020  Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas (AFNS) -- Air Force’s Personnel Center
  
 TagAFWN TagUSAF TagAF TagAir Force Tagnew division TagAFPC TagAir Force Personnel Center TagEFMP TagExceptional Family Member Program TagOne Air Force Tagintegration Tagcommunication Tagscreening requests Tagmedical Tagfamily Tagsupport Tagassignments
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Stella D. Carlos Salmeron v. Felipe De Jesus Garcia Santacruz

Appellate case number: 01-19-00087-CV

Trial court case number: 1117543

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

On May 7, 2020, this Court issued an order, advising appellant that her brief did not comply 

with Rule 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. The Court ordered appellant to file an amended brief in 

accordance with Rule 38.1 and advised appellant that if another non-compliant brief was filed, it 

would be treated as if no brief had been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9. The amended brief was 

due to be filed on July 6, 2020. No amended brief was filed.

Accordingly, the Court orders appellant to file an amended brief within 10 days of the 

date of this order, or the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.1; 42.3. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _September 10, 2020____
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Notices 56665 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Advisory Committee on Disability 

Compensation; Notice of Meeting 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

(VA) gives notice under Public Law 92– 

463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) 

that the Advisory Committee on 

Disability Compensation will meet on 

September 27, 2010, in the Astor 

Ballroom at the St. Regis Hotel, 923 16th 

Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 

7:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting is open 

to the public. 

The purpose of the Committee is to 

advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

on the maintenance and periodic 

readjustment of the VA Schedule for 

Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to 

assemble and review relevant 

information relating to the nature and 

character of disabilities arising from 

service in the Armed Forces, provide an 

ongoing assessment of the effectiveness 

of the rating schedule, and give advice 

on the most appropriate means of 

responding to the needs of Veterans 

relating to disability compensation. 

The Committee will receive briefings 

on issues related to compensation for 

Veterans with service-connected 

disabilities and other VA benefits 

programs. Time will be allocated for 

receiving public comments in the 

afternoon. Public comments will be 

limited to three minutes each. 

Individuals wishing to make oral 

statements before the Committee will be 

accommodated on a first-come, firstserved basis. Individuals who speak are 

invited to submit 1–2 page summaries of 

their comments at the time of the 

meeting for inclusion in the official 

meeting record. 

The public may submit written 

statements for the Committee’s review 

to Robert Watkins, Designated Federal 

Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs, 

Veterans Benefits Administration, 

Compensation and Pension Service, 

Regulation Staff (211D), 810 Vermont 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420 or 

e-mail at Robert.Watkins2@va.gov. Any 

member of the public wishing to attend 

the meeting or seeking additional 

information should contact Mr. Watkins 

at (202) 461–9214. 

Dated: September 10, 2010. 

By Direction of the Secretary. 

Vivian Drake, 

Acting Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23060 Filed 9–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4800]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          SHRINKING THE BUDGET

  (Mr. WISE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. WISE. Mr. Speaker, if they are making a movie this summer of the 
Republican budget, I think it can be titled ``Honey, I Shrunk the 
Budget and I Blew Up the Economy.'' I blew it up by gutting Medicare, 
cutting it up to 25 percent. And who will pay for that? Senior 
citizens, by not getting care; businesses and young people, by having 
to pay more insurance premiums; hospitals that have to close because 
they cannot absorb these kinds of losses.
  Blew up the economy by cutting programs that bring growth. Student 
loans cut by $33 billion. Student loans that affect almost every person 
in this country. The Economic Development Administration, the linchpin 
for so much industrial develop, the Appalachian Regional Commission 
terminated. These grow the economy; the Republican budget shrinks it. 
Balancing the budget, Mr. Speaker, is important for a strong economy. 
But not with this budget and not one that bankrupts the economy.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-2 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2011-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of WireCo WorldGroup Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ira L. Glazer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Ira L. Glazer                                                                 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Ira L. Glazer, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects next C-130J locationsPublished Nov. 25, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force has selected Louisville Air National Guard Base, Kentucky; McLaughlin ANGB, West Virginia; **Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base**, Texas; and **Savannah ANGB**, Georgia as the preferred locations to receive **C-130J Super Hercules** aircraft to replace their aging C-130Hs, pending the outcome of environmental assessments.The Air Force evaluated all C-130J candidate locations against objective criteria based on mission requirements. The preferred alternatives were the highest scoring locations based on that criteria.The C-130J reduces manpower requirements, lowers operating and support costs, and provides life-cycle cost savings over earlier C-130 models. Compared to older C-130s, the “J” model climbs faster and higher, flies farther at a higher cruise speed, and takes off and lands in a shorter distance.C-130J major system improvements include advanced two-pilot flight station with fully integrated digital avionics, color multifunctional liquid crystal and head-up displays, and state-of-the-art navigation that includes a dual inertial navigation system and GPS. The aircraft also features fully integrated defensive systems, low-power color radar, digital moving map display, new turboprop engines with six-bladed all-composite propellers and a digital autopilot. The C-130J also includes improved fuel, environmental and ice-protection and an enhanced cargo-handling system.Kentucky, West Virginia and Texas will begin receiving eight aircraft, each in 2021. Georgia will receive new aircraft if they become available in the future.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Louisville ANGB 



McLaughlin ANGB 



C-130J Super Hercules 



C-130H 



Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base 



Savannah ANGB 



Air National Guard 



ANG
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Cambridge Advantaged Properties II L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000771996
<NAME>                        CAMBRIDGE ADVANTAGED PROPERTIES II L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-25-1997
<CASH>                                           1,164,151
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,286,343
<PP&E>                                         120,948,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,594,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,989,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,421,894
<BONDS>                                         97,748,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (31,181,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,989,015
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,286,786
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,559,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,725,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,997,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     55,000
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,942,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (401)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID GLENN.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.