alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 2099

LUIS JANER RULLAN , Creditor

- Appellant , and GEORGE WILLIAM LIEBMANN , Trustee

- Appellant,

v. JILL K. GODEN , Debtor

- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 02887

- CCB; 1:21

- cv - 03170

- CCB; 1:21

- cv - 03171

- CCB )

Submitted : Ju ly 2 5 , 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2099 Doc: 28 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 George W. Liebmann, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Peter C. Choharis, CHOHARIS LAW GROUP, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Ap pellant Luis Janer Rullan.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2099 Doc: 28 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Luis Janer Rullan and George William Liebmann appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing Jill K. Goden’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, denying Rullan’s motion for sanctions, and denying as moot Liebmann’s pending motions. We hav e reviewed the record and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rullan v. Goden , No s . 1:21

- cv - 02887

- CCB ; 1:21

- cv - 03170

- CCB; 1:21

- cv - 03171

- CCB (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2022). W e dispense with ora l argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRM ED USCA4 Appeal: 22-2099 Doc: 28 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Yatra Online, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form
20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 30, 2017



| | By:    |  | /s/ Dhruv Shringi                                    
| | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  |  | Dhruv Shringi                                        
| | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Air Force Chief of Staff General Charles Q. Brown, Jr.Published Aug. 7, 2020
                        
                        By Angel Orozco
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week’s look Around the Air Force highlights the change of responsibility ceremony as Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr. becomes the 22nd Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and Gen. David Goldfein retires from service. (Hosted by Angel Orozco)  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



chief of staff 



CSAF 



chief of staff of the Air Force 



Gen. Charles Brown 



Gen. Charles Q Brown 



Gen. Charles Q Brown Jr 



Gen. David Goldfein 



Gen. David Goldfein Retired 



retired 



Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Brown 



Gen. Brown 



Gen. Goldfein
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Prospect Sustainable Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M. Grier Eliasek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





/s/ M. Grier Eliasek


M. Grier Eliasek


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: September 6, 2022
#### THE GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP REPUBLICAN LEAGUE v. DAVID F. WHITE.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                         Page 14

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brunswick Bancorp and subsidiaries
(the "company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") , I
Thomas Fornale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the company.

                                                             Thomas Fornale
              Date: 04/20/04                             -----------------------
                                                             Thomas Fornale
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6019]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          DISCHARGE PETITIONS

  Under clause 3, rule XXVII the following discharge petitions were 
filed:

       Petition 4, May 3, 1995, by Mr. Bryant of Texas on House 
     Resolution 127 has been signed by the following Member: John 
     Bryant.
Vol. 141           WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 1995            No. 72
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 Senate

                (Legislative day of Monday, May 1, 1995)
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2623 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2623

   To prohibit land management modifications relating to the Lesser 
                            Prairie Chicken.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2014

  Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. 
    Inhofe) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit land management modifications relating to the Lesser 
                            Prairie Chicken.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LAND MANAGEMENT MODIFICATIONS RELATING TO 
              LESSER PRAIRIE CHICKEN.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior shall 
not implement or limit any modification to a public or private land-
related policy or subsurface mineral right-related policy or practice 
that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act relating to the 
listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken as a threatened species or 
endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1531 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Stuart King Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Koons, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 30, 2015  /s/ David Koons David Koons Principal Financial Officer Principal Executive Officer
#### Henderson *v.*Tax Research Bureau, Inc.

[No. 18,863.

Filed May 28, 1957.

Rehearing denied June 28, 1957.

Transfer denied September 17, 1957.]

*Rice & Cheatham, Marion J. Rice, Bert C. Cheatham, Jack N. Van Stone, Charles E. Henderson, pro se,*all of Evansville, for appellant.

*Isidor Kahn, Harry P. Dees, Arthur R. Donovan, Robert Kahn, Willard C. Shrode,*and *Kahn, Dees Donovan •& Kahn, (of counsel),*all of Evansville, for appellee.

Kelley, P. J.

The facts, pleadings, contentions, ruling, judgment and governing principles in this appeal are substantially identical with those in the case of *Charles E. Henderson*v. *Evansville Press, Inc.,*No. 18,864, decided this day, with the exception that the report published by appellee in this case is garbled and a substantial part thereof is unintelligible and the date of publication is alleged to be unknown. The briefs filed by the parties in this case are identical with those filed in said Evansville Press, Inc., case and the same arguments are advanced.

*607For sake of clarity we set forth the published article as it appears in the complaint:

> “REEVES SAYS LAWYER’S PLEA FOR SPECIAL JUDGE ‘SHYSTERISM.’

> “Circuit Judge Ollie C. Reeves today termed a lawyer’s request for a special judge in a case scheduled for trial by jury Monday as ‘one of the lowest forms of shysterism.’ The rebuke, one of the strongest court attaches could 11, was made against attor Charles Henderson, est for a jurist to replace eeves was made in writ and aigned by Alson H. whose trial on a second lary court has ben y.

> -W. Franklin st. discovered only e Reeves would is case, s’ blast, Mr. Hat a contin said that Hender ■to file nd had pre he an important witness hadn’t been summoned through no fault of his. Under Indiana’s change of venue law, a last-, inute request for a special judge must be granted if the defendant only then learns of a judge’s prejudice. Judge Reeves granted Mr. Henderson’s request, and- Attorney William Welborn was selected to hear the case. He did not accept today and the 24 jurors that were to have heard the case Monday .are to be notified that the trial is postponed.”

Upon the authority and for the reasons given in *Charles E. Henderson*v. *Evansville Press, Inc.,*No. 18,864, ante, at-pg. 592, the judgment is reversed with directions to overrule the demurrer to the complaint herein, and for further proceedings.

NOTE. — Reported in 142 N. E. 2d 926.
#### MARY DOROBIS v. ALVIN GLADSTONE.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 AFROTC detachment commander, instructor vacancies available for summer 2019Published June 27, 2018
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have announced 45 projected Air Force Reserve Officers’ Training Corps detachment commander positions and 104 instructor vacancies available for summer 2019.



Line of the Air Force lieutenant colonels and majors selected for lieutenant colonel may apply for detachment commander positions.Officers eligible for instructor slots include first lieutenants, captains and majors in the Line of the Air Force competitive category.



Guard and Reserve officers are eligible to apply for both opportunities under the Voluntary Limited Period of Active Duty program. The application deadlines for detachment commanders and instructors are July 31 and Aug. 1, respectively.



Applicants must meet additional eligibility criteria for these career broadening leadership opportunities. Interested officers can search for eligibility and application procedures on myPers using keyword “AFROTC.” Guard and Reserve officers should use keyword “VLPAD.”



There are still 37 instructor vacancies remaining for this summer, which can be found on myPers under the "Hot Jobs" listing.



For more news and information, visit the **Air Force's Personnel Center** website.training 



officer 



instructor 



Air Force Personnel Center 



AFROTC 



lieutenant colonel 



school 



major 



2019 



detachment commander 



vacancy 



AFPC
#### MARIE BRIJA v. JOHN BRIJA.

July 11, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Oct. 19Published Oct. 19, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force, Air Force Special Operations Command Airmen are awarded the Air Force Cross and Air Medal, and U.S. Air Forces in Europe signs a joint exercise agreement with Nordic Air Chiefs. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- SecAF awards Air Force Cross, 10 medals to Air Commandos
- Nordic Air Chiefs sign letter, develop Arctic ChallengeAround the Air Force 



ATAF 



Featured Videos 



A1C Jasmine Vanderheyden 



AFSOC 



AF 



Africa 



USAFE 



Nordic 



Air Force Special Operations Command 



SecAF 



Heather Wilson 



Gen. Tod Wolters 



Air Force Cross 



Air Medal 



AC-130 



Spooky 



Flag Level Exercise
Exhibit 33.3



MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE



Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A.
(or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:



Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level
reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities
serviced by American Honda Finance Corporation issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying
agent services (the “Platform”).



Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed
by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined
are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).
With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.



Period: Twelve months ended March 31, 2012
(the “Period”).



With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s
management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| | · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122
of Regulation AB.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of and for the Period.



CITIBANK, N.A.



By: /s/ Karen Montbach________________________



Its: Managing Director_________________________



Dated: May 25, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 1995 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         3,101
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     15
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,446
<PP&E>                                        95,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                24,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                76,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,918
<BONDS>                                       96,700
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (28,388)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  76,614
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,775
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2,048)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (46.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (46.73)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)










I, Alyson M. Mount, certify that:






1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);






2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;






4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and






5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.






Date:  March 28, 2013




By:   /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer