# Patent

## Title
System and method for reconstructable all-in-one content stream

## Abstract

One embodiment provides a system for assembling a reconstructable content stream. The system obtains a content collection that includes a plurality of content components and generates a manifest. An entry in the manifest corresponds to a content component. The system obtains a set of stream-construction rules, generates a stream-construction manifest by attaching the set of stream-construction rules to the manifest, and constructs a set of stream objects based on the stream-construction rules. A respective stream object may include an embedded chunk of a content component. The system signs the set of stream objects and assembles the reconstructable content stream by including the stream-construction manifest followed by the set of stream objects, thereby enabling an intermediate node to extract and store one or more content components and to reconstruct, at a later time, stream objects for the one or more content components based on the stream-construction manifest and the stored components.

## Background
RELATED APPLICATIONS
The subject matter of this application is related to the subject matter in the following applications:

    
    
        U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/334,386, entitled “RECONSTRUCTABLE CONTENT OBJECTS,” by inventor Marc E. Mosko, filed 17 Jul. 2014; and
        U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/463,450, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALL-IN-ONE CONTENT STREAM IN CONTENT-CENTRIC NETWORKS,” by inventors Marc E. Mosko and Ignacio Solis, filed 19 Aug. 2014;

the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

    
    


BACKGROUND
1. Field
The present disclosure relates generally to a content-centric network (CCN). More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a system and method for downloading a set of Content Objects using a single named stream in content-centric networks (CCNs).
2. Related Art
The proliferation of the Internet and e-commerce continues to fuel revolutionary changes in the network industry. Today, a significant number of information exchanges, from online movie viewing to daily news delivery, retail sales, and instant messaging, are conducted online. An increasing number of Internet applications are also becoming mobile. However, the current Internet operates on a largely location-based addressing scheme. The two most ubiquitous protocols, Internet Protocol (IP) and Ethernet protocol, are both based on end-host addresses. That is, a consumer of content can only receive the content by explicitly requesting the content from an address (e.g., IP address or Ethernet media access control (MAC) address) that is typically associated with a physical object or location. This restrictive addressing scheme is becoming progressively more inadequate for meeting the ever-changing network demands.
Recently, information-centric network (ICN) architectures have been proposed in the industry where content is directly named and addressed. Content-Centric networking (CCN), an exemplary ICN architecture, brings a new approach to content transport. Instead of viewing network traffic at the application level as end-to-end conversations over which content travels, content is requested or returned based on its unique name, and the network is responsible for routing content from the provider to the consumer. Note that content includes data that can be transported in the communication system, including any form of data such as text, images, video, and/or audio. A consumer and a provider can be a person at a computer or an automated process inside or outside the CCN. A piece of content can refer to the entire content or a respective portion of the content. For example, a newspaper article might be represented by multiple pieces of content embodied as data packets. A piece of content can also be associated with metadata describing or augmenting the piece of content with information such as authentication data, creation date, content owner, etc.
In CCN, names play an important role. More specifically, Content Objects and Interests are identified by their name, which is typically a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI). Interests and Content Objects flow through the network based on their names. When downloading named content, which can be a file library or a web page, the requester often needs to issue an initial set of Interest messages to obtain the catalog of the library or the markup document of the web page. In the case of a web page, upon receiving the markup document, the requester needs to parse the markup document, and then start downloading embedded objects referenced by the markup document. Such a process often requires more than one round-trip time (RTT), thus adding significant latency to the content download process. This problem is similar to the download-latency problem experienced by IP networks.
In the IP world, people have not been satisfied with the performance of Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), because although very efficient at transferring individual files, HTTP cannot efficiently transfer a large number of small files. However, today's web destinations often include pages with tens of, or more, embedded objects, such as images, cascading style sheet (CSS) files, and external JavaScript files. Loading all these individual files takes time because of all the overhead of separately requesting them and waiting for the TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) sessions to probe the network capacity and ramp up their transmission speed. For example, when requesting web content using HTTP over TCP, the requester typically has to wait for a three-way TCP handshake to be completed to send a GET request before beginning to download the desired HTTP and HTML markup document. Then, after parsing the markup document, the requester can request the individual embedded objects. To reduce such download latency, certain “zero round-trip time” protocols have been developed in the IP setting, such as SPTYTM (registered trademark of Google Inc. of Menlo Park, Calif.) developed by Google. However, no such solutions exist in CCN settings.
SUMMARY
One embodiment of the present invention provides a system for assembling a reconstructable content stream and delivering the reconstructable content stream over a network. During operation, the system obtains a content collection that includes a plurality of content components and generates a manifest for the content collection. A respective entry in the manifest corresponds to a content component. The system obtains a set of stream-construction rules, generates a stream-construction manifest by attaching the set of stream-construction rules to the manifest, and constructs a set of stream objects for the content collection based on the set of stream-construction rules. A respective stream object may include an embedded chunk of a content component. The system further cryptographically signs the set of stream objects and assembles the reconstructable content stream by including the stream-construction manifest followed by the set of stream objects, thereby enabling an intermediate node in the network to extract and store embedded chunks of one or more content components and to reconstruct, at a later time, stream objects for the one or more content components based on the stream-construction manifest and the stored embedded chunks.
In a variation on this embodiment, the set of stream-construction rules includes one or more of: a rule that defines a naming convention for the set of stream objects, a rule that specifies a signing key, and a rule that specifies whether to include cryptographic signatures for the set of stream objects in the stream-construction manifest.
In a variation on this embodiment, a respective content component includes multiple chunks spanning multiple stream objects, and a corresponding entry in the manifest lists hash values of the multiple chunks embedded in the multiple stream objects.
In a further variation, the stream-construction manifest further comprises a cryptographic signature generated over the stream-construction manifest, thereby enabling a recipient of a stream object to authenticate the set of stream objects based on the cryptographic signature.
In a variation on this embodiment, the network is a content-centric network, and the stream objects are standard CCN Content Objects.
One embodiment of the present invention provides a system for reconstructing one or more stream objects that belong to a content stream for downloading a content collection. During operation, the system receives, from a provider of the content collection, an initial set of stream objects of the content stream. The initial set of stream objects includes a stream-construction manifest, and the stream-construction manifest includes a set of stream-construction rules and a set of entries corresponding to content components in the content collection. In response to determining that a content component included in the content collection exists in a local cache, the system reconstructs one or more stream objects for the content component based on the set of stream-construction rules, and inserts the reconstructed one or more stream objects into the content stream.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture of a network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 presents a diagram illustrating the format of a conventional manifest.
FIG. 3A presents a diagram illustrating the various components included in a web page.
FIG. 3B presents a diagram illustrating a conventional process of downloading a web page with embedded objects.
FIG. 4 presents a diagram illustrating the format of an exemplary all-in-one manifest, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 presents a diagram illustrating the format of exemplary Content Objects in the all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary process of downloading a content collection using an all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary recursive all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary all-in-one stream with a multiple-section manifest, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 9 presents a diagram illustrating a process of constructing an all-in-one stream that can be used to download a content collection, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary stream-construction manifest, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11 presents a diagram illustrating how to construct a stream Content Object, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 12 presents a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process of constructing a reconstructable all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 13 presents a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process of reconstructing an all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary system that enables a reconstructable all-in-one stream for content download, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Overview
Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and method for downloading a set of embedded objects (content component) using a reconstructable all-in-one stream. The reconstructable all-in-one stream allows a forwarder that has an embedded object in its cache to construct a set reconstructable Content Objects from its cached embedded object based on information carried in a special manifest, also known as a stream-construction manifest. The stream-construction manifest includes a normal all-in-one manifest plus stream-construction rules, metadata, and cryptographic signatures. This allows the forwarder to skip the process of obtaining the stream wrapper for cached embedded objects. In addition, the stream-construction manifest can serve as a secure catalog and carry all signatures for the entire stream.
In general, CCN uses two types of messages: Interests and Content Objects. An Interest carries the hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI), also called the “name” or the “CCN name” of a Content Object and serves as a request for that object. If a network element (e.g., router) receives multiple Interests for the same name, it may aggregate those Interests. A network element along the path of the Interest with a matching Content Object may cache and return that object, satisfying the Interest. The Content Object follows the reverse path of the Interest to the origin(s) of the Interest. A Content Object contains, among other information, the same HSVLI, the object's payload, and cryptographic information used to bind the HSVLI to the payload.
The terms used in the present disclosure are generally defined as follows (but their interpretation is not limited to such):

    
    
        “HSVLI:” Hierarchically structured variable-length identifier, also called a “name.” It is an ordered list of name components, which may be variable length octet strings. In human-readable form, it can be represented in a format such as ccnx:/path/part. Also the HSVLI may not be human-readable. As mentioned above, HSVLIs refer to content, and it is desirable that they be able to represent organizational structures for content and be at least partially meaningful to humans. An individual component of an HSVLI may have an arbitrary length. Furthermore, HSVLIs can have explicitly delimited components, can include any sequence of bytes, and are not limited to human-readable characters. A longest-prefix-match lookup is important in forwarding packets with HSVLIs. For example, an HSVLI indicating an Interest in “/parc/home/bob” will match both “/parc/home/bob/test.txt” and “/parc/home/bob/bar.txt.” The longest match, in terms of the number of name components, is considered the best because it is the most specific. Detailed descriptions of HSVLIs can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,069, entitled “SYSTEM FOR FORWARDING A PACKET WITH A HIERARCHICALLY STRUCTURED VARIABLE-LENGTH IDENTIFIER,” by inventors Van L. Jacobson and James D. Thornton, filed 23 Sep. 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        “Interest:” A request for a Content Object. The Interest specifies an HSVLI name prefix and other optional selectors that can be used to choose among multiple objects with the same name prefix. Any Content Object whose name matches the Interest name prefix (and, optionally, other requested parameters such as publisher key-ID match) satisfies the Interest.
        “Content Object:” A data object sent in response to an Interest. It has an HSVLI name and a content payload that are bound together via a cryptographic signature. Optionally, all Content Objects have an implicit terminal name component made up of the SHA-256 digest of the Content Object. In one embodiment, the implicit digest is not transferred on the wire, but is computed at each hop, if needed. Note that the Content Object is not the same as a content component. A Content Object has a specifically defined structure under the CCN protocol and its size is normally the size of a network packet (around 1500 bytes for wide area networks and 8000 bytes for local area networks and with fragmentation), whereas a content component is a general term used to refer to a file of any type, which can be an embedded object of a web page. For example, a web page may include a number of embedded objects, such as image, video files, or interactive components. Each embedded object is a content component and may span multiple Content Objects.
    
    


As mentioned before, an HSVLI indicates a piece of content, is hierarchically structured, and includes contiguous components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level. The length of a respective HSVLI is not fixed. In content-centric networks, unlike a conventional IP network, a packet may be identified by an HSVLI. For example, “abcd/bob/papers/ccn/news” could be the name of the content and identifies the corresponding packet(s), i.e., the “news” article from the “ccn” collection of papers for a user named “Bob” at the organization named “ABCD.” To request a piece of content, a node expresses (e.g., broadcasts) an Interest in that content by the content's name. An Interest in a piece of content can be a query for the content according to the content's name or identifier. The content, if available in the network, is sent back from any node that stores the content to the requesting node. The routing infrastructure intelligently propagates the Interest to the prospective nodes that are likely to have the information and then carries available content back along the reverse path traversed by the Interest message. Essentially the Content Object follows the breadcrumbs left by the Interest message and thus reaches the requesting node.
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture of a network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, a network 180 comprises nodes 100-145. Each node in the network is coupled to one or more other nodes. Network connection 185 is an example of such a connection. The network connection is shown as a solid line, but each line could also represent sub-networks or super-networks, which can couple one node to another node. Network 180 can be content-centric, a local network, a super-network, or a sub-network. Each of these networks can be interconnected so that a node in one network can reach a node in other networks. The network connection can be broadband, wireless, telephonic, satellite, or any type of network connection. A node can be a computer system, an endpoint representing users, and/or a device that can generate Interest or originate content.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a consumer can generate an Interest for a piece of content and forward that Interest to a node in network 180. The piece of content can be stored at a node in network 180 by a publisher or content provider, who can be located inside or outside the network. For example, in FIG. 1, the Interest in a piece of content originates at node 105. If the content is not available at the node, the Interest flows to one or more nodes coupled to the first node. For example, in FIG. 1, the Interest flows (Interest flow 150) to node 115, which does not have the content available. Next, the Interest flows (Interest flow 155) from node 115 to node 125, which again does not have the content. The Interest then flows (Interest flow 160) to node 130, which does have the content available. The flow of the Content Object then retraces its path in reverse (content flows 165, 170, and 175) until it reaches node 105, where the content is delivered. Other processes such as authentication can be involved in the flow of content.
In network 180, any number of intermediate nodes (nodes 100-145) in the path between a content holder (node 130) and the Interest generation node (node 105) can participate in caching local copies of the content as it travels across the network. Caching reduces the network load for a second subscriber located in proximity to other subscribers by implicitly sharing access to the locally cached content.
The Manifest
In CCN, a manifest (also known as a catalog) is used to represent a collection of data. For example, a CCN node may contain a video collection that includes a large number of video files, and the manifest of the video collection can be an ordered list identifying the Content Objects corresponding to the video files. Note that, due to the size limit of a Content Object, a video file may span multiple Content Objects. Moreover, a CCN node may store content for a web page, and the manifest for the web page identifies the different components of the web page, such as the markup document and embedded objects (including Java scripts, image files, audio files, video files, etc.).
In the manifest, each Content Object is identified by its name and corresponding digest, where the digest is the hash value (often computed using a cryptographic hash function, such as hash function SHA-256) of the Content Object. In some embodiments, each Content Object is also identified by a modified time indicating the time that the content was modified. FIG. 2 presents a diagram illustrating the format of a conventional manifest (prior art).
In FIG. 2, manifest 200 includes an ordered list of Content Objects identified by a collection name 204 and one or more of the following: a Content Object name 230.1-230.n; a digest 232.1-232.n; and a modified time 234.1-234.n. The digests 232.1-232.n include a hash value of the Content Object identified respectively by names 230.1-230.n. Manifest 200 also includes a root hash 202, which is an additive hash value based on the hash values 232.1-232.n of the individual Content Objects in the collection. Root hash 202 of manifest 200 is a unique identifier for manifest 200.
As shown in FIG. 2, manifest 200 can indicate a name and corresponding digest for each Content Object represented in the collection. Optionally, manifest 200 can also include a modified time for each Content Object represented in the collection. The use of the modified time field depends on the underlying application or service being performed. In addition to an ordered list, the manifest may also be structured as a synchronization tree, which contains Content Objects as well as nested collections of Content Objects.
In conventional CCNs, when a content requester requests a content collection, such as a web page, the requester needs to issue an initial set of Interest messages to read a piece of the content. FIG. 3A presents a diagram illustrating the various components included in a web page. In FIG. 3A, a web page 300 includes a markup document 302 and a number of objects referenced by markup document 302, such as JavaScript files 304 (File1.js) and 306 (File2.js) and embedded images 308 (image 1) and 310 (image N). In order to download entire web page 300, a requester first needs to request markup document 302, and then it needs to parse markup document 302 to get information about the embedded objects in order to request those objects, such as JavaScript files 304 and 306 or images 308 and 310.
FIG. 3B presents a diagram illustrating a conventional process of downloading a web page with embedded objects. In FIG. 3B, a requester 312 is downloading a web page that includes multiple embedded objects from one or more responders 314. During operation, requester 312 starts the downloading process by issuing a set of Interest messages 316 to responder 314 to request the markup document. Upon retrieving the markup document, requester 312 parses the markup document, and then requests the embedded objects (which can be a JavaScript file or an image) one by one. This results in the staggered requesting and downloading of the embedded objects, thus increasing latency. Moreover, because requester 312 does not know a priori how many chunks to request for an embedded object, it may send an estimated number of Interests to request the object, which may be too few or too many. For example, in FIG. 3B, Interest set 316 for the markup document includes four Interests, each with the same name prefix but different chunk numbers (such as /foo/page/s0, /foo/page/s1, . . . , /foo/page/s3). However, the number of issued Interests is less than the number of segments (chunks) included in markup document 302. Upon receiving the initial segments, requester 312 issues additional Interests for the rest of markup document 302. Upon receiving all segments (including a Content Object set 318 and a Content Object set 320) of markup document 302, requester 312 reads the markup document and requests the embedded objects (operation 322).
To request JavaScript file 304 (File1.js), requester 312 sends a set of Interest messages 324. Without a priori knowledge of the size of File1.js, requester 312 may open too large a window by issuing too many Interests. In FIG. 3B, requester 312 issues four Interests for File1.js, each with the same name prefix but different chunk numbers (such as /foo/File1.js/s0, /foo/File1.js/s1, . . . , /foo/File1.js/s3). However, File1.js contains only two segments, and returns a Content Object set 326 that includes only two Content Objects. Therefore, the extra two Interests sent from requester 312 for File1.js are wasted, and could have been used to request useful content, such as being used to start downloading JavaScript file 306 (File2.js). Similarly, requester 312 may again issue four Interests for JavaScript file 306 (File2.js), which has only one segment, meaning that three Interests are wasted. For content collections that include many small objects, this over-requesting can significantly reduce the overall throughput of the network.
In order to reduce the download latency and to improve throughput, in some embodiments, the system aggregates all the necessary content (including the markup document and all embedded objects) into a single named stream, and allows a requester to download all the necessary content using the single named stream, also known as an all-in-one stream. In some embodiments, this single named stream (the all-in-one stream) for a content collection includes an all-in-one manifest followed by the embedded objects. Note that, in order to facilitate downloading with the all-in-one stream, changes need to be made to a conventional manifest (as shown in FIG. 2) to obtain an all-in-one manifest. More specifically, the all-in-one manifest needs to specify the number of segments contained in each embedded object.
FIG. 4 presents a diagram illustrating the format of an exemplary all-in-one manifest, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 4, a content collection (which can include all content of a web page) 400 includes a manifest 402, a markup document 404, a JavaScript file (File1.js) 406, a JavaScript file (File2.ls) 408, and other components. Manifest 402 includes an ordered list of content components, with each entry corresponding to one content component, which can be a markup document or an embedded object. Each entry includes an object name field that specifies the CCN name of the content component, a chunk-number field that lists the sequence of the chunks of the content component within the all-in-one stream, and a chunk-hash field that lists the hash values of all the chunks.
For example, in FIG. 4, entry 410 included in manifest 402 corresponds to markup document 404. More specifically, entry 410 includes an object name field 412.1, a chunk-number field 414.1, and a chunk-hash field 416.1. Object name field 412.1 specifies the CCN base name (/foo/markup) of markup document 404. Chunk-number field 414.1 specifies that markup document 404 (identified by the CCN name 412.1) occupies chunks s3-s9 (seven chunks in total with each chunk being an individual Content Object) of the all-in-one stream. Note that, in some embodiments, the CCN name of each chunk (or each Content Object) can be constructed as the CCN base name of the content component plus the chunk number. For example, the first chunk of markup document 404 can have a CCN name /foo/markup/s0, and the last chunk can have a CCN name /foo/markup/s6, given that markup document 404 has seven chunks. Chunk-hash field 416.1 lists the Content Object hash values (such as 0x12AB, 0x7798, etc.) of all seven chunks. Note that in the example shown in FIG. 4, the Content Object hash values are shown as 2-byte hashes for viewing simplicity. In practice, the Content Object hash of a Content Object can be a 16-byte hash value calculated using a SHA-256 function or its equivalent.
Also shown in FIG. 4, entry 420 included in manifest 402 corresponds to JavaScript file 406 (File1.js). Similar to entry 410, entry 420 includes an object name field 412.2, a chunk-number field 414.2, and a chunk-hash field 416.2. More specifically, object name field 412.2 specifies that the CCN name for JavaScript file 406 is /foo/file1.js, chunk-number field 414.2 specifies that JavaScript file 406 has two chunks (s10 and s11), and chunk-hash field 416.2 lists the Content Object hash values for those two chunks (0xD2A0, 0x3333).
Note that unlike conventional manifests, manifest 402 enumerates the chunk ranges (or offset) of each embedded object in the all-in-one stream. This allows the requester of the content to determine whether the object (content component) is already covered by the outstanding Interest window. For example, if 10 Interests have been issued, then the 10th chunk has been covered by the issued Interests. In addition, including the Content Object hash of each chunk in the manifest 402 allows the requester to determine whether it already has an object or a segment of the object in its cache by comparing the Content Object hash values. If an object is not yet covered by an outstanding request and the requestor already has the object in its cache, the requester can skip the download of that embedded object. For example, embedded JavaScript file 406 ranges from s10 to s11 in the all-in-one stream, and if an initial request issues Interests up to chunk 9, then JavaScript file 406 is not covered by the initial request. In addition, based on the Content Object hashes of JavaScript file 406, the requester may determine that it already has JavaScript file 406 in its cache. Hence, the requester can then skip the download of JavaScript file 406 while continuing to download subsequent content components within content collection 400.
Moreover, listing the Content Object hashes of each content component allows a requester to open up separate Interest windows for each individual content component and request them by their hashes. More specifically, the requester can request a particular embedded object under its own name, using a self-certified Content Object hash name. For example, the requester may request JavaScript file 406 by the hashes of its two segments, 0xD2A0 and 0x3333. In other words, in addition to enabling content download using a single all-in-one stream, the all-in-one manifest also enables a requester to download content components using a set of parallel streams that are independent of each other. Hence, instead of waiting to parse the markup document before downloading the embedded objects, the requester can download the markup document and the embedded documents in parallel. Each stream request can be based on the hash name of the embedded object. Downloading an embedded object using its own hash name also allows the download to come from some well-positioned caches, whereas downloading the embedded objects along with the markup document may result in their coming from a less optimal source. For example, image files may have very long cache lifetimes, so they can be cached in many places, while the frequently updated web page (the markup) might have a short cache lifetime and is cached in few locations. In such situations, it is desirable to download the images from a nearby cache location, instead of downloading them from the same location of the markup document, which can be far away.
The All-in-One Stream
FIG. 5 presents a diagram illustrating the format of exemplary Content Objects in the all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. More specifically, FIG. 5 shows how a content collection (such as content collection 400) can be assembled into a single all-in-one stream that includes many chunks under the same namespace, with each chunk being a standard CCN Content Object. In FIG. 5, an all-in-one stream 500 includes a plurality of chunks, such as chunks 502, 504, 506, and 508. Each chunk is a standard CCN Content Object conforming to the standard CCN Content Object format. Each Content Object includes at least a name component 512.x, a key-ID component 514.x, a payload component 516.x, and a signature component 518.x, with x corresponding to the sequence number of the chunk.
The name component specifies the CCN name of each chunk/Content Object. In some embodiments, all Content Objects within the all-in-one stream have the same name prefix, and the CCN name of a Content Object is the name prefix plus its chunk number. In the example shown in FIG. 5, the name prefix of all Content Objects in all-in-one stream 500 is /foo/page/all-in-one, and the CCN name for Content Object 502 (which is the first chunk, chunk 0, in all-in-one stream 500) is /foo/page/all-in-one/s0, as indicated by name component 512.1. Similarly, the CCN name for Content Object 504 (which is the second chunk, chunk 1, in all-in-one stream 500) is /foo/page/all-in-one/s1, as shown by name component 512.2.
The key-ID component (514.x) within each Content Object identifies the public key used by the publisher to sign the Content Object. The signature component (518.x) can be obtained by signing, using the corresponding private key, the remaining portions of the Content Object. In some embodiments, the signature can be obtained by signing over the hash of the remaining portions of the Content Object. For example, one can obtain signature 518.1 by signing a hash value computed over name component 512.1, key-ID component 514.1, and payload component 516.1. Note that, in some embodiments, not all Content Objects within the all-in-one stream contain the key-ID. At a minimum, the first Content Object in the all-in-one stream should include the key-ID, or optionally carry the public key, so that intermediate nodes and end systems can verify signatures.
The payload component (516.x) for each Content Object or chunk includes either a portion of the manifest or a portion of an embedded content component, such as the markup document or a JavaScript file. The first few chunks (Content Objects) of the all-in-one stream often are wrapping objects that represent the manifest of the stream, and the payload of these wrapping objects is the manifest itself. Depending on the size of the manifest, the wrapping objects may include fewer or more Content Objects. In the example shown in FIG. 5, the manifest extends over three Content Objects (chunks s0-s2), with each Object containing a chunk of the manifest. For example, payloads 516.1 and 516.2 include the first and second chunks of the manifest, respectively.
The payloads of subsequent Content Objects include portions of the content components. For example, the payloads of Content Objects 506 and 508 include embedded Content Objects /foo/markup/s0 and /foo/markup/s1, which are the first and second chunks of the markup document. Note that, although each embedded content component chunk itself may be a CCN Content Object that has its own name (such as /foo/markup/s0 in the case of the chunk being part of the markup document), the corresponding Content Object assembled in the all-in-one stream is assigned its own stream name, as indicated by name component 512.x. All Content Objects within the same all-in-one stream are assigned the same name prefix. Note that assigning the same name prefix to all Content Objects in the all-in-one stream allows a requester to open a large-enough window to download all embedded content components continuously without the need to parse the markup document. For example, the requester can construct an initial set of Interests by sequentially adding the chunk number to the name prefix, and using the initial set of Interests to request the embedded content components without needing to know the numbers, names, or sizes of those embedded content components within a content collection. For example, a requester can issue a set of Interests (/foo/page/all-in-one/s0, /foo/page/all-in-one/s1, . . . , /foo/page/all-in-one/s19) to request the first 20 chunks of the all-in-one stream. Note that while downloading the chunks, the requester can read the manifest (which is usually downloaded first) to determine whether it needs to issue more Interests and whether it can skip the download of certain components because it already has them in its cache.
FIG. 6 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary process of downloading a content collection using an all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 6, a requester 602 is downloading a web page that includes multiple embedded objects from one or more responders 604. To enable the all-in-one download, an all-in-one manifest has been created as a wrapper for the content of the web page.
During operation, requester 602 starts the downloading process by issuing an initial set of Interest messages 606 to responder 604. The number of Interests included in initial set of Interest messages 606 can be arbitrary. In some embodiments, this initial window (as defined by initial Interest set 606) can be sufficiently large to cover all wrapper objects, i.e., the manifest, but not larger than the entire content collection. In the example shown in FIG. 6, initial Interest set 606 includes four Interests (/foo/page/all-in-one/s0 to /foo/page/all-in-one/s3), creating a download window large enough for the retrieval of the manifest. Note that requester 602 can continue to issue new Interests (while reading the manifest) to request other content components, such as the markup document and the JavaScript files, using the same name prefix (/foo/page/all-in-one). The new Interests can be created by sequentially adding the chunk numbers. In some embodiments, while downloading, requester 602 reads the manifest, determines the total number of chunks included in the content collection, and issues a suitable number of Interests accordingly. For example, from reading the manifest, requester 602 may determine that there are 20 total chunks in the all-in-one stream, and ensure that it issues 20 Interests in total.
In addition, the requester can determine whether it already has one or more content components or chunks in its cache based on the Content Object hashes listed in the manifest, and if so, skip the download of these chunks. For example, by comparing the Content Object hashes, the requester may find that it already has JavaScript file File1.js, which occupies chunks s10 and s11 in the all-in-one stream. To improve the download efficiency, the requester can issue an Interest set that excludes Interests foo/page/all-in-one/s10 and /foo/page/all-in-one/s11. By doing so, the requester provides parameters to the responder so that the responder can configure which embedded objects to be included in the download stream. In this example, because the Interest set does not have Interests for chunks s10 and s11, these two chunks are excluded from the download stream.
Comparing FIG. 6 to FIG. 3, one can see that there is no longer a need to stagger the download of the multiple embedded content components. Instead, in embodiments of the present invention, the download of the content collection can be accomplished using a single stream, thus potentially significantly reducing the download latency. Moreover, because the manifest lists the total number of chunks included in the download stream, there is no need for the requester to over-request, and no Interests will be wasted, thus increasing the system throughput.
In some embodiments, an object embedded in the payload of a stream chunk may also be an all-in-one stream itself. For example, an HTML file may reference frames of other HTML files or other objects, which could themselves be organized as an all-in-one stream. FIG. 7 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary recursive all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 7, all-in-one stream 700 includes a manifest 702 and a number of content components, such as a markup document 704, embedded objects 706 and 708, etc. More specifically, embedded object 708 itself is an all-in-one stream, which includes a manifest 712 and other content components, such as an embedded object 714. Note that, in such a situation, the parent manifest (manifest 702) treats embedded all-in-one stream 708 the same way as any other embedded objects by listing its stream name, range of chunks, and hash values of its chunks. Note that the corresponding Content Objects included in all-in-one stream 700, including the Content Objects carrying embedded all-in-one stream 708, are given the name prefix of all-in-one stream 700.
A content collection may include many embedded objects and each embedded object may span many Content Objects, such as a web page that contains a large number of high-resolution images. In such a situation, listing all embedded objects in a single manifest may result in the manifest being too big itself for efficient download. To improve manifest-download efficiency, in some embodiments, a large manifest that lists many embedded objects may be reorganized into a number of smaller manifests scattered at different locations within the all-in-one stream. FIG. 8 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary all-in-one stream with a multiple-section manifest, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 8, all-in-one stream 800 includes a number of manifest sections, such as an initial manifest section 802 and manifest sections 804 and 806; and a number of content components, such as a markup document 808, image files 810 and 812, etc. Instead of listing all embedded objects in initial manifest section 802, initial manifest section 802 may only contain information of markup document 808 and a pointer to a subsequent manifest, manifest section 804. This allows the requester to download, using an initial Interest window, initial manifest 802 and markup document 808, which include important web page information. The pointer included in initial manifest 802 enables the requester to request the subsequent manifest section. Organizing the manifest into multiple sections allows the requester to download portions of a web page while determining whether it has certain embedded objects in its cache already, and to skip downloading such objects if they are in the local cache.
In situations where large content components (such as high-resolution images) exist, instead of listing Content Object hash values of all Content Objects in the manifest, the manifest may list only a few initial Content Object hashes of each embedded object. For example, an embedded image may span a few hundred Content Objects; instead of listing the hash values of these hundreds of Content Objects, the manifest may only list the initial few (such as 10%) hash values. These few hash values should provide enough information to allow a requester to determine whether it already has the image in its cache or to begin downloading the image, maybe from a nearby location, under its own name space.
In some embodiments, the Interest messages can include a “modified since” parameter. Therefore, when such Interests are received, the responder includes, in the all-in-one stream and/or its manifest, only embedded objects that are modified after the “modified since” parameter. This allows a requester to skip the downloading of old files, such as old photos, while downloading a web page. In a variation, the all-in-one stream can include older objects that are newly referenced. For example, if an old photo has not been included in the web page manifest in a long time, it may be included in the all-in-one stream even though it has not been modified since the “modified since” parameter specified in the Interests.
In some embodiments, the all-in-one stream can be compressed.
FIG. 9 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary process of constructing an all-in-one stream that can be used to download a content collection, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. During operation, the content provider, such as a publisher, constructs an all-in-one manifest for the content collection (operation 902). In some embodiments, the manifest includes an ordered list of content components within the collection. Each entry in the ordered list includes an object name field that specifies the CCN name of a corresponding content component, a chunk-number field that lists the chunk numbers occupied by the content component within the all-in-one stream, and a chunk-hash field that lists the hash values of the first few or all chunks of the content component.
The content provider further packages the constructed manifest along with the content components into standard Content Objects (operation 904). In some embodiments, the Content Objects conform to CCN standards. Note that each Content Object is assigned a stream name, and all Content Objects in the stream have the same name prefix. Subsequently, the content provider receives a set of initial Interest requests under the name space of the stream (operation 906), and in response, the content provider constructs a stream of Content Objects, starting with the manifest, based on the received Interests and parameters included in the initial Interest requests (operation 908). In some embodiments, the parameters included in the Interest requests may include a “modified since” parameter. Note that once the requester receives the manifest, it may include, in subsequent Interests, parameters that are determined based on information included in the manifest. For example, the requester may skip one or more content components based on the hashes listed in the manifest, which may indicate that those components are in the requester's cache already.
The content provider continues to receive Interests from the requester (operation 910), determines the content components to be included in the stream based on the received Interests (operation 912), and continuously constructs the stream by including the appropriate components (operation 914).
The Reconstructable All-in-One Stream
In some embodiments of the present invention, the all-in-one stream can include reconstructable Content Objects. A reconstructable Content Object is constructed from a content piece based on a set of rules stored in a metadata file, and may include a cryptographic signature provided by the original publisher. To enable a recipient to reconstruct the Content Object, the reconstructable Content Object is transferred over the network along with the metadata file. The recipient extracts and saves the payload (in the form of a user file) and the signature, and discards the received Content Object. When needed, the recipient can reconstruct the original Content Object from the saved user file using the signature and information included in the metadata file. A detailed description of the reconstructable Content Object can be found in U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 14/334,386, entitled “RECONSTRUCTABLE CONTENT OBJECTS,” by inventor Marc E. Mosko, filed 17 Jul. 2014, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
As disclosed in the previous section, when a content requester requests a web page that contains multiple embedded objects, the content requester may open an initial window (by issuing an initial set of Interests) to download the web page along with the embedded objects in a single all-in-one stream. As shown in FIG. 5, the payload of the initial one or more stream Content Objects may include chunks of the all-in-one manifest, which enumerates the stream chunks for each embedded object and the hash values of all the chunks. Starting from the responder, the single all-in-one stream (and, thus, the stream Content Objects) may pass through multiple network nodes, such as routers, before they reach the requester. In CCN, it is desirable to have the intermediate nodes cache the all-in-one stream in its local content store such that it can respond to future requests to the web page. However, storing the all-in-one stream means storing stream Content Objects in a format shown in FIG. 5, such as Content Objects 502-508. Note that, as one can see from FIG. 5, Content Objects representing a content component, such as a markup document or an image file, are wrapped around by the stream wrapper, the name and the signature field. Hence, if a different requester attempts to request an individual embedded object, such as an image file, the router caching the all-in-one stream cannot respond because it is not aware of the embedded object in the stream Content Objects, unless the router removes the stream wrapper and extracts the payload, which is the embedded Content Objects. Therefore, in order to be able to respond to requests for the entire content piece that has embedded objects, as well as requests for individual embedded objects, the router may need to store the content piece in both forms, one as an all-in-one stream that includes a plurality of stream Content Objects, and one as individual embedded objects. For example, the router can extract payloads from the all-in-one stream, and store each individual embedded object, such as a JavaScript file or an image file, separately. Similarly, if the end node receiving the content piece (such as a web page) wants to respond to future requests, both the web page and any individual components may need to store the content piece in both forms.
However, storing the same content piece in two forms can result in undesired redundancy in data storage on the intermediate node, especially for a content piece that includes many embedded objects. To avoid such redundancy, in some embodiments of the present invention, the system generates and delivers reconstructable all-in-one streams, which allow an intermediate node to store the content piece as individual embedded objects and reconstruct the all-in-one stream when it receives a future request for the content piece. Note that each individual embedded object may span multiple standard CCN Content Objects that have the same CCN base name.
In order to enable an intermediate node to reconstruct the all-in-one stream, in some embodiments, the original node that initiates the all-in-one stream includes stream-construction information in the all-in-one manifest. Such a manifest is also known as a stream-construction manifest. In some embodiments, the stream-construction manifest includes everything in the normal all-in-one manifest (as shown in FIG. 4), plus a set of rules for constructing the all-in-one stream and a set of stream signatures.
FIG. 10 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary stream-construction manifest, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 10, stream-construction manifest 1000 includes an all-in-one manifest 1010, stream-construction metadata 1020, and a set of stream signatures 1030. More specifically, all-in-one manifest 1010 is similar to all-in-one manifest 402 shown in FIG. 4, and includes an ordered list of the embedded objects. Stream-construction metadata 1020 includes wrapper information for the stream Content Objects. In some embodiments, stream-construction metadata 1020 may include a set of rules that is used to construct the all-in-one stream. For example, the metadata 1020 can include a naming rule specifying how to name each stream chunk. In some embodiments, the naming rule may specify a CCN base name. Additional rules may include a rule that specifies a signing key (such as a key-ID identifying the public key), a rule that specifies whether to include a corresponding public key in one or more stream chunks, a rule that specifies whether to insert the stream signature in each stream chunk or to keep the stream signatures in metadata 1020, etc. In some embodiments, stream signatures 1030 include the stream signatures of all chunks in the stream. In some embodiments, stream-construction manifest 1000 serves as a secure catalog, and stream signatures 1030 includes a signature generated over stream-construction manifest 1000. In situations where stream-construction manifest serves as a secure catalog, the subsequent stream Content Objects no longer need to carry their own signatures, because all-in-one manifest 1010 contains the hash value of each stream chunk and a chain of trust can be formed. The chain of trust contains the manifest signature plus the hash chain to the embedded Content Objects.
Upon receiving the reconstructable all-in-one stream, the intermediate node or the end node can store the stream-construction manifest, extracts and stores the embedded objects, and may discard the received all-in-one stream. If it receives a future Interest for a particular embedded object, such as an image, it can directly return the corresponding embedded object. If it receives a future Interest for the entire content piece, it may reconstruct the all-in-one stream using the stored stream-construction manifest and the individual embedded objects. Moreover, if the content piece has been partially updated by the content publisher, the intermediate node may only fetch the updated portion (in the form of an all-in-one) stream from the content publisher, and then reconstruct stream Content Objects for the unchanged embedded objects from its cache based on the stream-construction manifest. The Intermediate node can then plug the reconstructed stream Content Objects into the all-in-one stream sent out from the publisher.
FIG. 11 presents a diagram illustrating how to construct a stream Content Object, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example shown in FIG. 11, a device or a node is reconstructing a stream Content Object from an embedded Content Object 1102 and a stream-construction manifest 1104. More specifically, embedded Content Object 1102 includes the first chunk of the markup document, hence the CCN name “/foo/markup/s0.” As disclosed previously, stream-construction manifest 1104 includes a set of rules for constructing a stream Content Object. These rules allow the device or node to generate the appropriate stream wrapper, which can include the name, the key information, and signatures. Note that the stream signature is generated by the originator of the all-in-one stream, and is different from the signature included in each embedded Content Object.
In the example shown in FIG. 11, reconstructed stream Content Object 1110 is nearly identical to original stream Content Object 506 shown in FIG. 5, and includes a name field 1112, a key-ID field 1114, a payload field 1116, and a signature field 1118. However, in the example shown in FIG. 11, unlike the signature field in original stream Content Object 506, signature field 1118 does not include the stream signature; instead, it may include a reference (as an implicit signature) to construct manifest 1104, which serves as a secure catalog and carries a signature for the secure catalog. Optionally, if aggregated signing is not performed and stream-construction manifest 1104 does not act as a secure catalog, the device can extract an individual stream signature contained in construct manifest 1104 and insert it into reconstructed stream Content Object 1110.
In some embodiments, a device or a node may reconstruct the entire all-in-one stream, or it may reconstruct a number of stream Content Objects and then insert them into a corresponding all-in-one stream.
In some embodiments, a device, such as a router or a forwarder, can proactively fetch embedded objects before a user requests them, and then use the reconstructable all-in-one stream to pass them to the user. For example, one or more popular images may be referenced by different web pages. To reduce future download latency, a router in the network may proactively obtain those images even before a web page containing such images is being requested by a user. When a user requests such a web page from the publisher of the web page, it may send Interests to the publisher, which in turn constructs and returns an all-in-one stream. On the other hand, the router situated between the publisher and the requester, may detect, based on the stream-construction manifest included in the returned all-in-one stream, that it already has one or more embedded images in its local cache and no longer needs to download those images. Instead, the router can construct a number of stream Content Objects using the cached Content Objects that represent the embedded images. More specifically, the router can generate an appropriate stream wrapper for each embedded Content Object based on the set of stream-construction rules included in the stream-construction manifest, and then apply the wrapper to the embedded Content Object. After constructing the stream Content Objects, the router then inserts the reconstructed stream Content Objects into the all-in-one stream sent out by the publisher of the web page.
In some embodiments, the stream-construction manifest may carry a globally unique identifier (GUID) in its first Content Object that can be used to uniquely identify the reconstructable all-in-one stream. In further embodiments, the GUID can be a hash value (such as a SHA-256 hash) of the stream-construction manifest itself. This GUID allows a node in the network to determine whether the node has seen the same stream. If so, most likely the node already has all content components of the stream in its local cache, and can immediately satisfy all Interests in the all-in-one stream by reconstructing the entire stream. Note that the intermediate node can only do that if it can verify the signature in the first Content Object.
FIG. 12 presents a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process of constructing a reconstructable all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. During operation, a publisher of a content collection that included multiple embedded objects constructs an all-in-one manifest (operation 1202). In some embodiments, the all-in-one manifest includes an ordered list of content components within the collection. Each entry in the ordered list includes an object name field that specifies the CCN name of a corresponding content component, a chunk-number field that lists the chunk numbers occupied by the content component within the all-in-one stream, and a chunk-hash field that lists the hash values of the first few or all chunks of the content component.
The publisher then obtains a set of stream-construction rules (operation 1204). Note that the set of rules can either be default or defined by the publisher. In some embodiments, the set of rules may specify how to generate the stream wrapper for each embedded Content Object. Based on the set of rules, the publisher generates a set of stream Content Objects for the content collection (operation 1206), and creates a cryptographic signature for each stream Content Object (operation 1208). The publisher can then generate a stream-construction manifest by including the all-in-one manifest, the set of stream-construction rules, and optionally the signatures (operation 1210), and place the stream-construction manifest at the beginning of the reconstructable all-in-one stream (operation 1212).
FIG. 13 presents a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process of reconstructing an all-in-one stream, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. During operation, an intermediate node receives, from a provider of an all-in-one stream, an initial set of stream Content Objects (operation 1302). The intermediate node reads the first stream Content Object to extract a GUID (operation 1304), and authenticates the first Content Object based on the stream signature (operation 1306). The intermediate node then determines whether the extracted GUID matched a GUID of a stream-construction manifest stored in its local cache (operation 1308). If so, the intermediate node accesses the stored stream-construction manifest (operation 1310), and reconstructs the stream Content Objects using a set of cached content components (operation 1312). Subsequently, the intermediate node assembles an all-in-one stream by including the cached stream-reconstruction manifest and the reconstructed stream Content Objects (operation 1314), forwards the all-in-one stream to the stream requester (operation 1316), and marks all Interests for the all-in-one stream as having been satisfied (operation 1318). If no GUID match is found, the intermediate node continues to receive and forward the remaining stream Content Objects (operation 1320), and marks the Interests as satisfied when all stream Content Objects have been forwarded to the stream requester (operation 1318).
Computer and Communication System
FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary system that enables a reconstructable all-in-one stream for content download, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A system 1400 that implements a reconstructable all-in-one stream comprises a processor 1410, a memory 1420, and a storage 1430. Storage 1430 typically stores instructions that can be loaded into memory 1420 and executed by processor 1410 to perform the methods mentioned above. In one embodiment, the instructions in storage 1430 can implement a construction manifest generation module 1432, a stream Content Object generation module 1434, and a reconstructable all-in-one stream assembly module 1436, all of which can be in communication with each other through various means.
In some embodiments, modules 1432, 1434, and 1436 can be partially or entirely implemented in hardware and can be part of processor 1410. Further, in some embodiments, the system may not include a separate processor and memory. Instead, in addition to performing their specific tasks, modules 1432, 1434, and 1436, either separately or in concert, may be part of general- or special-purpose computation engines.
Storage 1430 stores programs to be executed by processor 1410. Specifically, storage 1430 stores a program that implements a system (application) for enabling all-in-one content download. During operation, the application program can be loaded from storage 1430 into memory 1420 and executed by processor 1410. As a result, system 1400 can perform the functions described above. System 1400 can be coupled to an optional display 1480 (which can be a touch screen display), keyboard 1460, and pointing device 1470, and can also be coupled via one or more network interfaces to network 1482.
The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.
The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.
Furthermore, methods and processes described herein can be included in hardware modules or apparatus. These modules or apparatus may include, but are not limited to, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a dedicated or shared processor that executes a particular software module or a piece of code at a particular time, and/or other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules or apparatus are activated, they perform the methods and processes included within them.
The above description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.

## Claims

1. A computer-executable method for assembling a reconstructable content stream and delivering the reconstructable content stream over a content centric network (CCN), comprising:
generating, by a computer, a content manifest for a content collection comprising a plurality of content components, wherein a respective entry in the content manifest corresponds to a content component;
generating a stream-construction manifest by attaching a set of stream-construction rules to the content manifest;
constructing a first set of stream content objects based on the set of stream-construction rules, wherein a respective stream content object from the first set of stream content objects includes a chunk of the stream-construction manifest;
constructing a second set of stream content objects for the content collection based on the set of stream-construction rules, wherein a respective stream content object from the second set of stream content objects includes a chunk of a content component, and wherein the first set of stream content objects and the second set of stream content objects have a same name prefix;
assembling the reconstructable content stream by appending the second set of stream content objects to the first set of stream content objects, thereby enabling an intermediate node in the network to extract and store chunks of one or more content components and to reconstruct, at a later time, stream content objects for the one or more content components based on the stream-construction manifest and the stored chunks.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of stream-construction rules includes one or more of:
a rule that defines a naming convention for the set of stream content objects;
a rule that specifies a signing key; and
a rule that specifies whether to include cryptographic signatures for the set of stream content objects in the stream-construction manifest.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein a respective content component includes multiple chunks spanning multiple stream content objects, and a corresponding entry in the content manifest lists hash values of the multiple chunks included in the multiple stream content objects.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the stream-construction manifest further comprises a cryptographic signature generated over the stream-construction manifest, thereby enabling a recipient of a stream content object to authenticate the set of stream content objects based on the cryptographic signature.

5. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that when executed by a computing device cause the computing device to perform a method for assembling a reconstructable content stream and delivering the reconstructable content stream over a content-centric network (CCN), the method comprising:
generating a content manifest for a content collection comprising a plurality of content components, wherein a respective entry in the content manifest corresponds to a content component;
generating a stream-construction manifest by attaching a set of stream-construction rules to the content manifest;
constructing a first set of stream content objects based on the set of stream-construction rules, wherein a respective stream content object from the first set of stream content objects includes a chunk of the stream-construction manifest;
constructing a second set of stream content objects for the content collection based on the set of stream-construction rules, wherein a respective stream content object from the second set of stream content objects includes a chunk of a content component, and wherein the first set of stream content objects and the second set of stream content objects have a same name prefix; and
assembling the reconstructable content stream by appending the second set of stream content objects to the first set of stream content objects, thereby enabling an intermediate node in the network to extract and store chunks of one or more content components and to reconstruct, at a later time, stream content objects for the one or more content components based on the stream-construction manifest and the stored chunks.

6. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, wherein the set of stream-construction rules includes one or more of:
a rule that defines a naming convention for the set of stream content objects;
a rule that specifies a signing key; and
a rule that specifies whether to include cryptographic signatures for the set of stream content objects in the stream-construction manifest.

7. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, wherein a respective content component includes multiple chunks spanning multiple stream content objects, and a corresponding entry in the content manifest lists hash values of the multiple chunks included in the multiple stream content objects.

8. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the stream-construction manifest further comprises a cryptographic signature generated over the stream-construction manifest, thereby enabling a recipient of a stream content object to authenticate the set of stream content objects based on the cryptographic signature.

9. A computer-implemented method for reconstructing one or more stream content objects that belong to a content stream for downloading a content collection, comprising:
receiving, by a computer, from a provider of the content collection, an initial set of stream content objects belonging to the content stream, wherein a respective stream content object from the initial set of stream content objects includes a chunk of a stream-construction manifest, wherein the stream-construction manifest includes a set of stream-construction rules and a set of entries corresponding to content components in the content collection;
in response to determining that a content component included in the content collection exists in a local cache, reconstructing one or more stream content objects for the content component based on the set of stream-construction rules, wherein a respective stream content object from the one or more reconstructed stream content objects includes a chunk of the content component, and wherein the initial set of stream content objects and the one or more reconstructed stream content objects have a same name prefix; and
inserting the one or more reconstructed stream content objects into the content stream.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the set of stream-construction rules includes one or more of:
a rule that defines a naming convention for the set of stream content objects;
a rule that specifies a signing key; and
a rule that specifies whether to include cryptographic signatures for the set of stream content objects in the stream-construction manifest.

11. The method of claim 9, further comprising:
extracting a global unique identifier (GUID) for the content stream from a foremost stream content object in the initial set of stream content objects;
in response to determining that the local cache stores a copy of the stream-construction manifest based on the extracted GUID, reconstructing a copy of the entire content stream using content components stored in the local cache; and
delivering the copy of the entire content stream to a requester of the content stream.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein a respective entry in the stream-construction manifest corresponds to a content component spanning multiple stream content objects, wherein the entry lists hash values of multiple chunks embedded in the multiple stream content objects.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the stream-construction manifest further comprises a cryptographic signature generated over the stream-construction manifest, thereby enabling a recipient of a stream content object to authenticate the set of stream content objects based on the cryptographic signature.

14. A computer system for reconstructing one or more stream content objects that belong to a content stream for downloading a content collection, the system comprising:
a processor; and
a storage device coupled to the processor and storing instructions which when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform a method, the method comprising:
receiving, by a computer, from a provider of the content collection, an initial set of stream content objects belonging to the content stream, wherein a respective stream content object from the initial set of stream content objects includes a chunk of a stream-construction manifest, wherein the stream-construction manifest includes a set of stream-construction rules and a set of entries corresponding to content components in the content collection;
in response to determining that a content component included in the content collection exists in a local cache, reconstructing one or more stream content objects for the content component based on the set of stream-construction rules, wherein a respective stream content object from the one or more reconstructed stream content objects includes a chunk of the content component, and wherein the initial set of stream content objects and the one or more reconstructed stream content objects have a same name prefix; and
inserting the one or more reconstructed stream content objects into the content stream.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the set of stream-construction rules includes one or more of:
a rule that defines a naming convention for the set of stream content objects;
a rule that specifies a signing key; and
a rule that specifies whether to include cryptographic signatures for the set of stream content objects in the stream-construction manifest.

16. The system of claim 14, wherein the method further comprises:
extracting a global unique identifier (GUID) for the content stream from a foremost stream content object in the initial set of stream content objects;
in response to determining that the local cache stores a copy of the stream-construction manifest based on the extracted GUID, reconstructing a copy of the entire content stream using content components stored in the local cache; and
delivering the copy of the entire content stream to a requester of the content stream.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein a respective entry in the stream-construction manifest corresponds to a content component spanning multiple stream content objects, wherein the entry lists hash values of multiple chunks embedded in the multiple stream content objects.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the stream-construction manifest further comprises a cryptographic signature generated over the stream-construction manifest, thereby enabling a recipient of a stream content object to authenticate the set of stream content objects based on the cryptographic signature.