alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4447]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING

  (Ms. DeLAURO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, when a terrorist's bomb tore a hole in the 
Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, its impact was felt across 
the country. We all grieved with the families and we prayed that the 
rescue workers would find more survivors.
  Their grief leads us to want to affirm our country as both free and 
tolerant. Here is Congress, we must call on people of good will from 
both parties to repudiate extremist, paramilitary forces and 
provocative rhetoric that pushes people to violence and terrorism. By 
doing so, we do not politicize a tragedy, we live up to our 
responsibilities to respond to this tragedy.
  The images of bloodied babies being carried from the smoking rubble 
of the Murrah Building and the grieving families will stay with us for 
a long time. But, we should also remember the heroes of the Oklahoma 
City. Remember the rescue workers and the volunteers. And, remember the 
indominable spirit of the people of Oklahoma City. Our thoughts and 
prayers remain with them, today. And, we owe it to them, to both the 
victims and the heroes of Oklahoma City, to stand up to the forces that 
seek to divide us with words of hate.

                          ____________________
```
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 30, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 1 3
- 0 1384
- CR
CHARLES EDWARD PHINI SEE , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Distri ct Court No. 1 D allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 13
- 70249
- H



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion b y Justice Fillmore Charles Edward Phinisee waived a jury and pleaded not guilty to failure to register as a sex offender

. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 62.102(a) (West Supp. 2013 ). After the trial court found Phinisee guilty, he pleaded true to one enhancement paragraph. T he trial court assessed punishment at two years’ imprisonment

. On appeal, Phinisee ’s attorney filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a- 2

- copy of the brief to Phinisee

. We advised Phinisee of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se respon se. See Kelly v. State , 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief

. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,
82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases)

. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Although not an arguable issue, we note the trial court’s judgment incor rectly states Phinisee entered a guilty plea to the offense. We modify the trial court’s judgment to show the plea to the offense was not guilty. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State , 865 S.W.2d 26,
27

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State , 813 S.W.2d 526, 529

– 30 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d). As modified, w e affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 131384F.U05- 3

- 

## Court of Appea **ls Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** 

JUDGMENT

CHARLES EDWARD PHINI SEE , Appellant
No. 05

- 13

- 01384

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 70249

- H). Opinion deli vered by Justice Fillmore, Justices Evans and Lewis participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled “Plea to Offense” is modified to show “Not Guilty.” As modified, we AF FIRM the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment entered July 30, 2014.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2932

___________

Fred Miller, Jr., *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

American States Insurance Company, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 8, 1999

Filed: April 13, 1999

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jacquelyn O. Brinkley commenced this action claiming that her former

employer, American States Insurance Company, wrongfully terminated her

employment as a claims adjuster on account of her race and gender. Brinkley

committed suicide, and her husband, Fred Miller, Jr., was substituted as plaintiff.
1The HONORABLE MARY ANN L. MEDLER, United States Magistrate

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was assigned with the

consent of the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

Miller now appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment dismissing the

Title VII race discrimination claim. 

After careful review of the record, we agree with the district court that

American States presented evidence of a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for

Brinkley’s discharge -- her repeated submission of travel expense reports containing

false odometer readings from the personal automobile she used for reimbursable

business travel. We further agree with the district court that, although Miller

presented evidence that Brinkley’s false readings reflected mistaken estimates, rather

than an attempt to cheat American States, Miller presented no evidence that Brinkley

was treated more harshly than similarly situated white employees, and no other

evidence that American States’s asserted reason for the termination was a pretext for

race discrimination. Finally, like the district court, we are not persuaded that

American States’s inability to produce contemporaneous odometer reading records

for other employees warranted the denial of summary judgment dismissing this Title

VII claim. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. Rule

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
July 3, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THOMAS DEWAYNE MORELAND, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00035-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[No. 43715-1-I.

Division One.

April 17, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Patrick J. Trice, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-00887-0, Jay V White, J., entered October 26, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# CMSAF Bass tours Travis AFB

              - Published  March 29, 2021
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Alexander Merchak                                                    
              - 60 Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs

**TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --  **
**Travis Air Force Base** welcomed **Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass** during a base visit March 24-26.During the visit, Bass met with Airmen from multiple units across the base learning firsthand how Travis AFB accelerates change and demonstrates a culture of trust.Bass met the Airmen who deployed in February to transport humanitarian goods in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relief efforts in Texas as well as Airmen assigned to the 921st Contingency Response Squadron who showed her combat equipment and suited her up in body armor.“We never know when we are going to be called upon to protect, defend or support our amazing country,” Bass said. “I know by having conversations with the Airmen from Travis (AFB) that we are ready for any phone call that will require us to respond.”During Bass’ time meeting with the 60th Medical Group, Airmen explained how their roles have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.Among the many other things Travis AFB Airmen showed Bass during her visit was the modernization of operations in the 60th Maintenance Group and the 60th Security Forces Squadron.Airmen from the 60th Maintenance Group spoke to her about the modernization of processes in the 60th Aerial Port Squadron. The unit is working towards implementing Wi-Fi on the flight line and a virtual reality troubleshooting course to enhance mission effectiveness in real time.While visiting with the 60th Security Forces Squadron, Bass learned about the mission defense team, acquisition process simplification and small unmanned aerial system.“Dedication to accelerate change in modernizing our Air Force to what it needs to be in 10, 15, 20 years is important,” Bass said. “This is what I see happening at Travis.”At the conclusion of her visit, Bass shared she felt inspired by the Airmen at Travis AFB.“There’s a special feeling that’s hard to describe when talking to Travis Airmen,” Bass said. “I know I can trust each and every one of you to see the mission through. You all have shown me what it means to ‘Trust Travis,’ and trust is the foundation of leadership in our Air Force. Thank you for what you do day in and day out.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAMCAir Mobility CommandTravis AFBChief Master Sgt. of the Air ForceJoAnne S. BassHumanitarianFEMA
News United States Air Force
 AF travelers reminded of flat rate per diem policyPublished Nov. 19, 2017
                        
                        By Ed Shannon
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs
                **Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Some Air Force travelers may not be aware of a flat rate per diem policy established a few years ago that focused on extended temporary duty travel.
Congress instituted the flat rate in November 2014. The new policy reduced per diem from 100 percent to 75 percent for TDYs from 31 to 180 days and to 50 percent for TDYs over 180 days.
Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center finance officials encourage Air Force travelers whose temporary duty travel exceeds 30 days and their approving officials to be knowledgeable of the policy.
“We want to make sure Air Force travelers and approving officials understand the policy when creating travel authorizations and filing vouchers so that payments can be made timely and accurately,” said Col. Burke Beaumont, deputy director of AFIMSC’s Resource Management Directorate.
Flat rate per diem information is available at the Defense Travel Management Office website at http://www.defensetravel.dod.mil.flat rate 



Travel Pay 



AFIMSC 



per diem 



finance 



TDY 



temporary duty
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>                   

THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
IVAX CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                       161,564
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                102,679  <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                  145,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             468,410
<PP&E>                                                       193,777  <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               753,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        210,335
<BONDS>                                                       94,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      11,984
<OTHER-SE>                                                   408,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 753,043
<SALES>                                                      149,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             149,055
<CGS>                                                         99,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 99,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               1,266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   2,630
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (3,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (3,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0  <F3>
<FN>
<F1>  AMOUNT SHOWN IS NET OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2>  AMOUNT SHOWN IS NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F3>  AMOUNT IS ANTI-DILUTIVE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
cc: First Judicial District Court, Dept. 1 Keith David Houston Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(01 1947A cre 

# :44,11111111fla :fro 

# VW - ":,`;
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. FKA CST
      Entertainment, Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 10QSB for the period ending December
      31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and Principle
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





Dated: August
      21, 2008





/S/
                Robert MatthewsName:
                Robert MatthewsTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting
                Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARY WILLIAMS.

Nov. 26, 1979.

Petition for certification granted. (See 168 *N.J.Super.*359)
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ULTRATEC, INC., Appellant

v.

CAPTIONCALL, LLC, Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF
COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y
AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

, Intervenor

______________________

2019

- 2000, 2019

- 2005, 2019

- 2006

______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and App eal Board in No s . IPR2013

- 00542, IPR2013

- 00543, IPR2013

- 00550.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K RISTIN G RAHAM N OEL , Quarles & Brady, LLP, Madison, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by M ARTHA J AHN S NYDER

, A NTHONY A LLEN T OMASELLI

. Case: 19-2000 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 10/14/2020P RATIK A. S HAH , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Z.W. J ULIUS C HEN

, R ACHEL J. E LSBY ; M ICHAEL P.
K

AHN

, C AITLIN E LIZABETH O LWELL

, M ICHAEL N ASSER P ETEGORSKY , New York, NY; R UBEN H. M UNOZ , Philadelphia, PA.

F RANCES L YNCH , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED

, M OLLY R. S ILFEN

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge

, L OURIE and

M OORE

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 14, 2020
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 19-2000 Document: 72 Page: 2 Filed: 10/14/2020
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the *“Company* ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”* ),
      I,
      Patrick White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 14, 2006








/s/Patrick
      White


Patrick
      White


Chief
      Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4680]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    NOTICE OF CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE FEDERAL 
REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA BEYOND MAY 30, 1995--MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT 
               OF THE UNITED STATES (H. DOC. NO. 104-73)

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following message 
from the President of the United States; which was read and, together 
with the accompanying papers, without objection, referred to the 
Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed:

To the Congress of the United States:
  Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) 
provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, 
prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President 
publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a 
notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the 
anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent the 
enclosed notice to the Federal Register for publication, stating that 
the emergency declared with respect to the Federal Republic of 
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), as expanded to address the actions 
and policies of the Bosnian Serb forces and the authorities in the 
territory that they control within the Republic of Bosnia and 
Herzegovina, is to continue in effect beyond May 30, 1995.
  The circumstances that led to the declaration on May 30, 1992, of a 
national emergency have not been resolved. The Government of the 
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) continues to 
support groups seizing and attempting to seize territory in the 
Republics of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina by force and violence. 
In addition, on October 25, 1994, I expanded the scope of the national 
emergency to address the actions and policies of the Bosnian Serb 
forces and the authorities in the territory that they control, 
including their refusal to accept the proposed territorial settlement 
of the conflict in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The actions 
and policies of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and 
Montenegro) and the Bosnian Serb forces and the authorities in the 
territory that they control pose a continuing unusual and extraordinary 
threat to the national security, foreign policy interests, and the 
economy of the United States. For these reasons, I have determined that 
it is necessary to maintain in force the broad authorities necessary to 
apply economic pressure to the Government of the Federal Republic of 
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) and to the Bosnian Serb forces and 
the authorities in the territory that they control to reduce their 
ability to support the continuing civil strife in the former 
Yugoslavia.
                                                  William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, May 10, 1995.

  

                          ____________________
```