alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1



CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.



|                                     |  | PETROLEUM
    CONSULTANTS          |  |                                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                                     |  |                                   
|13640 BRIARWICK DRIVE,
    SUITE 100 |  | 306 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 302 |  | 1000 LOUISIANA STREET, SUITE
    1900
|AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729-1707             |  | FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987       |  | HOUSTON,
    TEXAS 77002-5008        
|512-249-7000                         |  | 817-
    336-2461                  |  | 713-651-9944                         
|                                     |  | www.cgaus.com                      |  |                                      



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND
GEOLOGISTS



We hereby consent to the
use of the oil and gas reserve information in the Permianville Royalty Trust Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2023, based on the reserve report dated January 30, 2024. We also consent to the inclusion of our report
dated January 30, 2024 as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and to the incorporation by reference of such report in Permianville Royalty
Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-265777).



| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| |                                        
| | W. Todd Brooker, P.E.                  
| | Senior Vice President                  
| | Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.   
| | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693



Fort Worth, Texas

March 22, 2024
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Victor A. De Jesus,
do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,
and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Exchange
Note Servicing Supplement 2011-A to the Closed-End Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2011 (the “Exchange Note Servicing
Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp. as Closed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as
follows:



(i)          A review of
the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and covered by
the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange Note
Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement), has been made
under my supervision.



(ii)         To the best
of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange Note
Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.



| |  | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of March 14, 2014.
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.                          
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | By:                                                 
| | Name:  Victor A. De Jesus                           
| | Title:  Vice President, Finance and Administration /
| | Chief Financial Officer
#### AURORA HONIG v. JERSEY AREA FOOD TRANSPORT, INC.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40133

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES RAY POLK,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CR-38-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Ray Polk appeals the sentence he received after his

case was remanded for resentencing. He contends that the

district court erred when it resentenced him because it used

U.S.S.G. § 2A1.5, the “murder” guideline, to determine his base

offense level. Polk’s challenge to the district court’s

application of that guideline is barred by the law-of-the-case

doctrine and is beyond the scope of remand. See United States v.

Marmolejo, 139 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir. 1998), petition for 
No. 98-40133

-2-

cert. filed, (U.S. Jul. 20, 1998)(No. 98-5372); Chevron U.S.A.,

Inc. v. Traillour Oil Co., 987 F.2d 1138, 1150 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD J. TRAMMEL.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22759]



[[Page 55803]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Epi-Centers for the Prevention of Healthcare-
Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Adverse Events, 
Funding Opportunity Announcement, CI11-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

Time and Date

    8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 8, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: Sheraton Gateway Hotel Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan 
Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30337, Telephone: (770) 997-1100.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Epi-Centers for the Prevention of Healthcare-
Associated Infectious, Antimicrobial Resistance and Adverse Events, 
FOA CI11-001.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-22759 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2610 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the John P. 

Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2014 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of establishing the John P. Parker House in Ripley, 

Ohio, as a unit of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John P. Parker House 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2610 IS

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

4 means the John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, 

5 which was recognized as a National Historic Land6 mark in 1997. 

7 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF JOHN P. PARKER 

8 HOUSE. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

10 resource study of the study area to determine the suit11 ability and feasibility of establishing the John P. Parker 

12 House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park Sys13 tem. 

14 (b) STUDY REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall 

15 conduct the study in accordance with section 8 of the Na16 tional Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 

17 1a–5). 

18 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

19 on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, 

20 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

21 Resources of the House of Representatives and the Com22 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

23 a report that describes— 

24 (1) the results of the study; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2610 IS

1 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Oct. 11Published Oct. 11, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force the Air Force hurricane cleanup efforts continue and the Pacific Air Forces Commander discusses PACAF’s mission. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- Keesler AFB sustains no major damage from Hurricane Nate
- A view from the PacificKorea 



PACAF 



Keesler AFB 



Mississippi 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



Gen O’Shaughnessy 



ATAF 



cleanup
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Operation Christmas Drop 2020Published Dec. 25, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Eric Mann
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                This week’s look around the Air Force highlights the long standing tradition of Operation Christmas Drop. (Hosted by Senior Airman Angelo Rosario)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**-Operation Christmas Drop**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



AFWN 



holiday 



christmas 



airdrop 



tradition 



C-130J 



374th AW 



Yokota AB 



734th ams 



Andersen AFB 



Guam 



515th AMW 



JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam 



University of Guam 



Operation Christmas Drop 



Humanitarian 



supplies
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Homeland Security Construction Corporation ) ASBCA No. 57985 

) 

Under Contract No. W912KC-D-10-0014 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Victor G. Klingelhofer, Esq. 

Andrew K. Wible, Esq 

Cohen Mohr LLP 

Washington, DC 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

CPT Anthony V. Lenze, JA 

CPT Evan C. Williams, JA 

Trial Attorneys 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

This appeal has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 20 August 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 57985, Appeal of Homeland Security 

Construction Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41943

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

DEREK W. LEWIS ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 686

Filed: August 21, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Melissa Moody , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion to correct an illegal sentence, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon . Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Mark W. Olson, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent

.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Derek W. Lewis pled guilty to second degree murde r , Idaho Code § § 18

- 4001, 18

- 4002,

18

- 4003 . The district court imposed a unified life sentence with a minimum period of
confinement of twenty years . Lewis filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for correction of an
illegal sentence, which the district court denied. Lewis a ppeals.
Pursuant to Rule 35, the district court may correct an illegal sentence at any time. In an
appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 35 to correct an illegal sentence, the question of
whether the sentence imposed is illegal is a question of la w freely reviewable by the appellate

court. State v. Josephson , 124 Idaho 286, 287, 858 P.2d 825, 826 (Ct. App. 1993); State v.
Rodriguez , 119 Idaho 895, 897, 811 P.2d 505, 507 (Ct. App. 1991).2 Idaho Code § 18

- 4004 sets the outer limits of the permissible sentence for second degree
murder (ten years to life). Idaho Code § 18

- 107 gave the district court the authority to impose a
sentence anywhere within those outer limits, and Idaho Code § 19

- 2513(1) gave the district court

the discretion to determine what portion of the sentence would be determinate or indeterminate.
Lewis’s unified life sentence with twenty years determinate for second degree murder was
consistent with each of these provisions.
Having reviewed the record in this case, we conclude that Le wis has failed to
demonstrate that his sentence is illegal. Thus, the district court did not err in denying his Rule 35
motion. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Lewis’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Arthur P. TRANAKOS, Esq., Respondent.

No. 79-1754.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1981.

Arthur P. Tranakos, Atlanta, Ga., pro se.

Deborah A. Bail, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for respondent.

Before CHOY, FERGUSON, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Upon due consideration, Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq. is hereby suspended indefinitely from practice before this court.

*493After a reasonable length of time has expired, if Mr. Tranakos can demonstrate to this court that he is knowledgeable regarding the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the rules of this court, and that he will abide by the orders of this court promptly and diligently, this court will consider lifting the suspension; Provided, That, as to the five (5) cases pending in this court in which he is counsel for the appellants, he may present oral argument and participate in auxiliary matters, such as motions for rehearing, so that his clients in those cases may not be prejudiced.

Further, Mr. Tranakos is assessed as a sanction the sum of five hundred dollars, ($500.00), payable within thirty (30) days from the date hereof to the Clerk of this Court, and he shall not seek reimbursement of that sum from his client herein.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN R. FLICK, DECEASED.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air University’s Barnes Center begins beta-testing for ALS DLC

              - Published  Oct. 21, 2020
              -                             By Air University Public Affairs                                                     

**MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --  **
The **Thomas N. Barnes Center** for Enlisted Education has begun a beta-test of its completely updated Airman Leadership School Distance Learning Course, ALS DLC 1.0. The course is scheduled for release to **Air National Guard** and **Air Force Reserve** Airmen in November.

 

The Noncommissioned Officer Distance Learning Course (NCO DLC 2.0), released in July, received high praise from ANG and Reserve technical sergeants for being more relevant to the way noncommissioned officers work and learn. The positive feedback about the curriculum, interactive media, and course delivery was taken into account while creating the new ALS DLC in order to create a meaningful and engaging course.

 

The ALS DLC curriculum focuses on four outcome-based, multimedia modules; leadership, culture, problem-solving and mission. The modules contain 22 lessons, each based on national strategic documents, which prepare front-line Guard and Reserve enlisted leaders with the most pertinent information, critical to their development as leaders. Each lesson consists of reading assignments, videos, audio clips and knowledge checks.

 

The course is designed to be device agnostic, ensuring ease of operation and compatibility across various devices. Videos are housed on YouTube and are accessible any place, any time, anywhere. The student readings and audio files are also downloadable, which allows students to continue to study, even when internet service is unavailable. Additionally, students can take their assessments at home on their own devices, saving them a trip to the education office.

 

“Our citizen-Airmen have multiple demands for their time and cannot always leave their civilian job to attend professional military education courses. This Airman Leadership Course allows all Airmen to have the same education as those attending in-residence,” said Chief Master Sgt. Sherry Marnell, Barnes Center ANG advisor. “The feedback I’ve received from the students thus far has been very positive.”

 

ALS DLC is open to all Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve senior Airmen and staff sergeants. Students may self-enroll at any time, and they will have four months to complete the course. Similar to the NCO DLC 2.0, students are not restricted to a specific class start date, so they can fit the course into their schedules when it is most convenient.

For more information on the ALS DL course, visit **https://auportal.sso.cce.af.mil/SIS/app/** (CAC required).

FSUSAFAFAir ForceThomas N. Barnes CenterALSAirman Leadership SchoolALS DLCAirman Leadership School Distance Learning CourseinnovationAETCAir Education Training Command
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Date:  March 27, 2015





Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount





Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6126-S6127]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          TO AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATION BY SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
proceed to the immediate consideration of Senate Resolution 113, 
submitted earlier today by Senators Dole and Daschle, authorizing 
representation by Senate legal counsel.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk 
will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       A resolution (S. Res. 113) to authorize representation by 
     Senate Legal Counsel.

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
resolution be considered and agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and 
the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, and that any 
statements relating to the resolution appear at the appropriate place 
in the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  [[Page S6127]] So the resolution (S. Res. 113) was considered and 
agreed to.
  The preamble was agreed to.
  The resolution, with its preamble, is as follows:
                              S. Res. 113

       Whereas, in the case of Committee for Judicial Review v. 
     The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Senator 
     Orrin Hatch, No. 1:95CV0770, pending in the United States 
     District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff 
     has filed a complaint, seeking, among other relief, to 
     restrain the Committee on the Judiciary from conducting 
     confirmation hearings on the nomination of Peter C. Economus, 
     who has been nominated to be a United States District Judge 
     for the Northern District of Ohio;
       Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the 
     Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) 
     and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the Senate may direct its counsel to 
     defend committees and Members of the Senate in civil actions 
     relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, 
     be it
       Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 
     represent the Committee on the Judiciary, its chairman, 
     Senator Orrin G. Hatch, and the other members of the 
     Committee on the Judiciary in the case of Committee for 
     Judicial Review v. the United States Senate Committee on the 
     Judiciary, Senator Orrin Hatch.
     

                          ____________________
```