alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2011-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
|Somsak Chivavibul    

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Senior Securitization Officer)

Navient Funding, LLC
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mobile Vault, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A Amendment No. 1 for the year ending May 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Danielle Olsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mobile Vault, Inc., and will be retained by Mobile Vault, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ Danielle Olsen Danielle Olsen Chief Executive Officer February 27, 2013
#### NORTH PLAINFIELD STATE BANK v. BARA INDUSTRIES, INC.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CHANDANA BASU,

 Debtor,

CHANDANA BASU,

 Appellant,

 v.

LEONARD SOLONIUK, M.D.,

 Appellee.

No. 10-60043

BAP No. 10-1062

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Hollowell, Kirscher, and Markell, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Chandana Basu appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”)

FILED

JAN 03 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-60043

order denying reconsideration of its order dismissing her appeal for failure to

prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for an

abuse of discretion, Nat’l Bank of Long Beach v. Donovan (In re Donovan), 871

F.2d 807, 808 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The BAP did not abuse its discretion in denying Basu’s motion for

reconsideration because Basu failed to establish grounds for such relief, and

instead, merely repeated arguments previously presented to and considered by the

BAP. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (listing grounds for relief from judgment); Fed. R.

Bankr. P. 9024 (applying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 to bankruptcy proceedings with

limited exceptions).

We do not address arguments raised for the first time on appeal, including

Basu’s contentions regarding the merits of the bankruptcy court’s judgment in the

underlying Chapter 7 adversary proceeding against her. See Padgett v. Wright, 587

F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

Basu’s motion to augment the record with documents not relevant to the sole

issue properly on appeal is denied.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4516]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        REPUBLICAN MEDICARE CUTS

  (Mr. WARD asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. WARD. Mr. speaker, I must rise today to speak out against the 
proposed reductions in Medicare spending which I feel will devastate 
our Nation's elderly.
  Under the guise of protecting and strengthening the Medicare trust 
fund, Republicans have proposed billions in reductions in future 
spending over the next 7 years. Republicans have pledged not to cut 
Social Security, interest on the debt, or defense in order to pay for 
their tax cuts, therefore, the only remaining source from which to cut 
is Medicare.
  The Medicare trust fund should be addressed appropriately as a long-
term problem and should take into careful consideration the needs of 
our Nation's seniors. This debate should take place apart from the 
budget debate and apart from efforts to salvage the cynical, public 
opinion poll-driven Contract for American campaign promises.
  Mr. Speaker, I call once again for compassion for the elderly of our 
society, another vulnerable, defenseless group which must be protected.

                          ____________________
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11016 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
VICENTE ALEJANDRO PEREZ

- MOLINA, also known as Vi n cente Perez, also known as Alex Molina , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 6

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vicente Alejandro
Perez

- Molina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flor es , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez

- Molina has filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 17, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11016 Document: 00514476297 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2018No. 17

- 11016

2 reflected therein , as well as Perez

- Molina ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-11016 Document: 00514476297 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2018
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22842]



[[Page 55805]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training Review Subcommittee A.
    Date: November 4-5, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Carole H. Latker, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 
Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-2848. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2beb3a6b9b7a0b192bcbbb5bfa1fcbcbbbafcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c707d6877796e7f5c72757b716f32727574327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 8, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-22842 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          9,845
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 123,939 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              145,102
<PP&E>                                         54,172<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,293,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         131,517
<BONDS>                                       125,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,291<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,011,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,293,286
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              122,102<F4>
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  92,344<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,511<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,956
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,956
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .03
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>REFLECTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F3>COMPRISED OF COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B STOCK.
<F4>COMPRISED OF NET REVENUES.
<F5>COMPRISED OF OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION AND
          AMORTIZATION.
<F6>COMPRISED OF DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION, AND CORPORATE GENERAL AND
          ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.
</FN>



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5739]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING MAJORITY LEADER

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The able acting majority leader is 
recognized.

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, this morning at 10:30, following morning 
business, the Senate will resume consideration of H.R. 956, the product 
liability bill.
  All Members should be aware that amendments are expected throughout 
the day. Therefore, Senators should be on notice that there will be 
rollcall votes during today's session which probably will go into the 
evening.
  I yield the floor.
  Mr. ASHCROFT addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Hutchison). The Senator from Missouri is 
recognized.

                          ____________________
```
SHLM-2014.08.31-EX-10.10






Exhibit 10.10


Director Compensation 
  
Each director of A. Schulman, Inc. (the “Corporation”) who is not an employee of the Corporation shall receive an annual retainer fee of $160,000 for attending up to 24 meetings per fiscal year.  For each meeting attended in excess of 24 meetings in a calendar year, each director shall receive an additional per meeting fee of $1,500.  Directors with significant additional duties shall receive the following additional retainers: (i) $20,000 for the lead independent director; (ii) $17,500 for the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chairperson; and (iii) $10,000 for all other committee chairpersons.  Non-employee directors are also eligible for grants under the Corporation’s equity award plans.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Force Protection Video Equipment Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, I, Paul Feldman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Force Protection Video Equipment Corp., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Force Protection Video Equipment Corp.   December 23, 2016By:/s/ Paul FeldmanPaul FeldmanChief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### STANBON *v.*FURBER.

This case is governed by the decision of the Court in *Stanbon*v. *Howe,*ante, 418.

No. 609.

Patent Appeals.

Submitted January 13, 1910.

Decided February 1, 1910.

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case.

*Reversed.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. Frederick L. Fmery*and *Mr. Laurence A. Janney*for the appellant.

*Mr. A. D. Salinger*and *Mr. Horace A. Dodge*for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Robb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Counsel stipulated that this case involved the same question *427and the same testimony as was involved in case No. 607 [ante, 418], and that the decision in that case should be binding in this. The decision will therefore be reversed and priority awarded Stanbon.

The clerk will certify the same as by law required.

*jReversed.*
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2651 

To repeal certain mandates of the Department of Homeland Security Office 

of Inspector General. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2014 

Mr. COBURN (for himself and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal certain mandates of the Department of Homeland 

Security Office of Inspector General. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS OIG Mandates 

5 Revision Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AN AN8 NUAL EVALUATION OF THE CARGO INSPECTION TAR9 GETING SYSTEM.— 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2651 IS

1 (1) REPEAL.—Subsections (g) and (h) of sec2 tion 809 of the Coast Guard and Maritime Trans3 portation Act of 2004 (46 U.S.C. 70101 note) are 

4 repealed. 

5 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 809 

6 of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation 

7 Act of 2004 (46 U.S.C. 70101 note), as amended by 

8 paragraph (1), is amended— 

9 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and (j)’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘and (h)’’; and 

11 (B) by redesignating subsections (i), (j), 

12 and (k) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respec13 tively. 

14 (b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AN AN15 NUAL REVIEW OF COAST GUARD PERFORMANCE.— 

16 (1) REPEAL.—Section 888(f) of the Homeland 

17 Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 468(f)) is repealed. 

18 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 888 

19 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 

20 468), as amended by paragraph (1), is amended by 

21 redesignating subsections (g), (h), and (i) as sub22 sections (f), (g), and (h), respectively. 

23 (c) ACCOUNTING OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL

24 POLICY FUNDS.—Section 705(d)(A) of the Office of Na25 tional Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2651 IS

1 (21 U.S.C. 1704(d)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘, and re2 quire such accounting to be authenticated by the Inspector 

3 General for each agency prior to submission to the Direc4 tor’’. 

5 (d) ANNUAL REVIEW OF GRANTS TO STATES AND

6 HIGH-RISK URBAN AREAS.— 

7 (1) REPEAL.—Section 2022(a)(3) of the Home8 land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 612(a)(3)) is 

9 repealed. 

10 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 

11 2022(a) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 

12 U.S.C. 612(a)), as amended by paragraph (1), is 

13 amended— 

14 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), 

15 (6), and (7) as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and 

16 (6), respectively; 

17 (B) in paragraph (4), as redesignated— 

18 (i) by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and 

19 (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; and 

20 (ii) by striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and 

21 inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’. 

22 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

23 by this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 

24 2015. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of Completion of Panel Review of the International Trade Administration's final determination of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico (Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2008-1904-03).

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order of the Binational Panel dated July 20, 2010, affirming the determination described above, the panel review was completed on September 2, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Valerie Dees, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On July 20, 2010, the Binational Panel issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order affirming the International Trade Administration's final determination concerning Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico. The Secretariat was instructed to issue a Notice of Completion of Panel Review on the 31st day following the issuance of the Notice of Final Panel Action, if no request for an Extraordinary Challenge Committee was filed. No such request was filed. Therefore, on the basis of the Panel Order and Rule 80 of the                     *Article 1904 Panel Rules,*                     the Panel Review was completed and the panelists were discharged from their duties effective                 

Dated: September 2, 2010.

Valerie Dees,

United States Secretary, AFTA Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2010-22371 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4556]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            DON'T MAKE SENIORS PAY FOR TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH

  (Mr. LEWIS of Georgia asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to say to my 
colleagues on the other side of the aisle: Do not cut Medicare to pay 
for tax cuts for the rich.
  Under some Republican plans, seniors--37 million seniors--will pay an 
additional $900 each year for health care. These cuts will be used to 
pay for tax cuts for the rich. For people who earn more than $230,000.
  That is not right. That is not fair.
  Medicare is the lifeline for many of our seniors.
  It is time to be frank and honest with the American people. Tell them 
what you are doing and why. Lay all your cards on the table, face up.
  Do not take health care from our senior citizens to pay for tax cuts 
for the rich. That is not Medicare reform. And our senior citizens will 
not be fooled.

                          ____________________
```