Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 5495 

• Retention of records should only be 

in cases were there is a reasonable 

suspicion of criminal or terrorist 

activity; 

• The retention period should be 

shortened; 

• Records should only be maintained 

on non-U.S. Citizens; and 

• Records should only be shared 

pursuant to a court order. 

Responses to all these 

recommendations have been provided 

elsewhere within this document. 

Upon careful review of the submitted 

public comments, having taken into 

consideration public comments 

resulting from this NPRM and SORN, as 

well as the Department’s position on 

these public comments, DHS has 

determined that for the reasons stated, 

it is important that the exemptions 

remain in place. DHS will implement 

the rulemaking as proposed. 

List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5 

Freedom of information; Privacy. 

■ For the reasons stated in the preamble, 

DHS amends Chapter I of Title 6, Code 

of Federal Regulations, as follows: 

PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS 

AND INFORMATION 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 5 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 

2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. 

Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. 

Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a. 

■ 2. Add at the end of Appendix C to 

Part 5, Exemption of Record Systems 

under the Privacy Act, the following 

new paragraph ‘‘46’’: 

Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of 

Records Exempt From the Privacy Act 

* * * * * 

46. The DHS/CBP—007 Border Crossing 

Information system of records will maintain 

border crossing information on travelers who 

are admitted or paroled into the United 

States. This information includes: certain 

biographical information; a photograph (if 

available); certain itinerary information 

provided by air and sea carriers and any 

other forms of passenger transportation, 

including rail, which is or may subsequently 

be mandated, or is or may be provided on a 

voluntary basis; and the time and location of 

the border crossing. This system may contain 

records or information pertaining to the 

accounting of disclosures made from DHS/ 

CBP—007 Border Crossing Information 

system of records to agencies (Federal, State, 

Local, Tribal, Foreign, or International), in 

accordance with the published routine uses. 

For the accounting of these disclosures only, 

the Secretary of Homeland Security has 

exempted this system from the following 

provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the 

limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(c)(3); 

(e)(8); and (g) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). 

Additionally, for the accounting of these 

disclosures only, the Secretary of Homeland 

Security has exempted this system from the 

following provisions of the Privacy Act, 

subject to the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 

552(c)(3); (e)(8); and (g) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

552a(k)(2). Further, no exemption shall be 

asserted with respect to biographical or travel 

information submitted by, and collected 

from, a person’s travel documents or 

submitted from a government computer 

system to support or to validate those travel 

documents. After conferring with the 

appropriate component or agency, DHS may 

waive applicable exemptions in appropriate 

circumstances and where it would not appear 

to interfere with or adversely affect the law 

enforcement purposes of the systems from 

which the information is recompiled or in 

which it is contained. Exemptions from the 

above particular subsections are justified, on 

a case-by-case basis to be determined at the 

time a request is made, when information in 

this system or records is recompiled or is 

created from information contained in other 

systems of records subject to exemptions for 

the following reasons: 

(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for 

Disclosures) because making available to a 

record subject to the accounting of 

disclosures from records concerning him or 

her would specifically reveal any 

investigative interest in the individual. 

Revealing this information could reasonably 

be expect to compromise ongoing efforts to 

investigate a violation of U.S. law, including 

investigations of a known or suspected 

terrorist or criminal, or other person of 

interest, by notifying the record subject that 

he or she is under investigation. This 

information could also permit the record’s 

subject to take measures to impede the 

investigation, e.g., destroy evidence, 

intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the 

area to avoid or impede the investigation. 

(b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice to 

Individuals) because to require individual 

notice of disclosure of information due to 

compulsory legal process would pose an 

impossible administrative burden on DHS 

and other agencies and could alert the 

subjects of counterterrorism or law 

enforcement investigations to the fact of 

those investigations when not previously 

known. 

(c) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to 

the extent that the system is exempt from 

other specific subsections of the Privacy Act. 

Dated: January 21, 2010. 

Mary Ellen Callahan, 

Chief Privacy Officer, Department of 

Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2200 Filed 2–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–06–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

10 CFR Part 50 

RIN 3150–AI01 

[NRC–2007–0008] 

Alternate Fracture Toughness 

Requirements for Protection Against 

Pressurized Thermal Shock Events; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects a rule 

that appeared in the Federal Register on 

January 4, 2010 (75 FR 13), that amends 

the NRC’s regulations to provide 

alternate fracture toughness 

requirements for protection against 

pressurized thermal shock (PTS) events 

for pressurized water reactor (PWR) 

pressure vessels. This document is 

necessary to correct formatting and 

typographical errors in paragraph (g). 

DATES: The correction is effective 

February 3, 2010, the date the original 

rule becomes effective. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking 

and Directives Branch, Office of 

Administration, Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001, telephone 301–492–3663, e-mail 

Michael.Lesar@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR doc. 

E9–31146, published on January 4, 

2010, make the following correction: 

§ 50.61a [Corrected] 

■ 1. On page 27, paragraph (g) of 

§ 50.61a is corrected to read as follows: 

(g) Equations and variables used in 

this section. 

Equation 1: RT = MAX RT + T MAX AW NDT(U) plate 30 pla − −− Δ te NDT(U) axial weld 30 axial weld ⎡ RT + T ⎣ ⎤

⎦ ⎡⎣ ⎤ { } − − ⎦ , Δ

Equation 2: RT = RT + T MAX PL NDT(U) plate 30 plate − −− Δ


WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULESER03FE10.000</MATH> ER03FE10.001</MATH>
5496 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

Equation 3: RT = RT + T MAX FO NDT(U) forging 30 forgi − −− Δ ng

Equation 4: RT = MAX RT + T MAX CW NDT(U) plate 30 pla − −− Δ te NDT(U) circweld 30 circweld

NDT

, RT + T 

RT

⎡

⎣ ⎤⎦ ⎡⎣ ⎤ { − − ⎦ Δ ,

(U) forging 30 forging ⎡ − − + T ⎣ ⎤ Δ ⎦}

Equation 5: T = MD + CRP Δ 30

Equation 6: MD = A 1 0.001718 T 1 6.13 ×− × ( ) C ×+ × ( ) P × × 2.471 Mn t φ e

0 5.

 Equation 7: CRP = B 1 + 3.77 Ni f Cu g 1.191 × × ( ) × ( ) e ,P C ×ue , , Ni t ( ) φ e

where: 

P [wt-&%] = phosphorus content 

Mn [wt-%] = manganese content 

Ni [wt-%] = nickel content 

Cu [wt-%] = copper content 

A = 1.140 × 10¥7 for forgings 

A = 1.451 × 10¥7 for plates 

A = 1.417 × 10¥7 for welds 

B = 102.3 for forgings 

B = 102.5 for plates in non-Combustion 

Engineering manufactured vessels 

B = 135.2 for plates in Combustion 

Engineering vessels 

B = 155.0 for welds 

jte = jt for j ≥ 4.39 × 1010 n/cm2/sec 

jte = jt × (4.39 × 1010/j)0.2595 for j < 

4.39 × 1010 n/cm2/sec 

where: 

j [n/cm2/sec] = average neutron flux 

t [sec] = time that the reactor has been in full 

power operation 

jt [n/cm2] = j × t 

f(Cue,P) = 0 for Cu ≤ 0.072 

f(Cue,P) = [Cue¥0.072]0.668 for Cu > 

0.072 and P ≤ 0.008 

f(Cue,P) = [Cue¥0.072 + 1.359 × 

(P¥0.008)]0.668 for Cu > 0.072 and 

P > 0.008 

where: 

Cue = 0 for Cu ≤ 0.072 

Cue = MIN (Cu, maximum Cue) for Cu > 0.072 

maximum Cue = 0.243 for Linde 80 welds 

maximum Cue = 0.301 for all other materials 

g(Cue,Ni,jte) = 0.5 + (0.5 × tanh 

{[log10(jte) + (1.1390 × Cue)¥(0.448 

× Ni)¥18.120]/0.629} 

Equation 8: Residual (r) = measured 

DT30¥predicted DT30 (by Equations 

5, 6 and 7) 

Equation 9: Mean deviation for a data set of n data points = (1/n) ×

=

∑ ri

i

n

1

Equation 10: Maximum credible heataverage residual = 2.33s/n0.5

where: 

n = number of surveillance data points 

(sample size) in the specific data set 

s = standard deviation of the residuals about 

the model for a relevant material group 

given in Table 5. 

Equation 11: = T m

se(m) SURV

where: 

m is the slope of a plot of all of the r values 

(estimated using Equation 8) versus the 

base 10 logarithm of the neutron fluence 

for each r value. The slope shall be 

estimated using the method of least 

squares. 

se(m) is the least squares estimate of the 

standard-error associated with the 

estimated slope value m. 

Equation 12: * = r r

σ

where: 

r is defined using Equation 8 and s is given 

in Table 5 

TABLE 1—PTS SCREENING CRITERIA

Product form and RTMAX–X

values 

RTMAX–X limits [°F] for different vessel wall thicknesses 6

(TWALL) 

TWALL ≤ 9.5 in. 9.5 in. < TWALL

≤ 10.5 in. 

10.5 in. < TWALL

≤ 11.5 in. 

Axial Weld—RTMAX–AW ............................................................................................. 269 230 222 

Plate—RTMAX–PL ....................................................................................................... 356 305 293 

Forging without underclad cracks—RTMAX–FO 7 ........................................................ 356 305 293 

Axial Weld and Plate—RTMAX–AW + RTMAX–PL ........................................................ 538 476 445 

Circumferential Weld—RTMAX–CW 8 .......................................................................... 312 277 269 

Forging with underclad cracks—RTMAX–FO 9 ............................................................. 246 241 239 

6Wall thickness is the beltline wall thickness including the clad thickness. 

7Forgings without underclad cracks apply to forgings for which no underclad cracks have been detected and that were fabricated in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.43. 8 RTPTS limits contribute 1×10¥8 per reactor year to the reactor vessel TWCF. 


ER03FE10.002</MATH> ER03FE10.003</MATH> ER03FE10.004</MATH> ER03FE10.005</MATH> ER03FE10.006</MATH> ER03FE10.007</MATH> ER03FE10.008</MATH> ER03FE10.009</MATH>WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 5497 

9Forgings with underclad cracks apply to forgings that have detected underclad cracking or were not fabricated in accordance with Regulatory 

Guide 1.43. 

TABLE 2—ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF FLAWS IN WELDS

Through-wall extent, TWE [in.] Maximum number of flaws per 1,000-inches 

of weld length in the inspection volume that 

are greater than or equal to TWEMIN and less 

than TWEMAX TWEMIN TWEMAX

0 .......................................................................... 0.075 ................................................................ No Limit. 

0.075 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 166.70. 

0.125 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 90.80. 

0.175 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 22.82. 

0.225 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 8.66. 

0.275 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 4.01. 

0.325 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 3.01. 

0.375 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 1.49. 

0.425 ................................................................... 0.475 ................................................................ 1.00. 

0.475 ................................................................... Infinite ............................................................... 0.00. 

TABLE 3—ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF FLAWS IN PLATES AND FORGINGS

Through-wall extent, TWE [in.] Maximum number of flaws per 1,000 squareinches of inside surface area in the inspection 

volume that are greater than or equal to 

TWEMIN and less than TWEMAX. This flaw 

density does not include underclad cracks in 

forgings 

TWEMIN TWEMAX

0 .......................................................................... 0.075 ................................................................ No Limit. 

0.075 ................................................................... 0.375 ................................................................ 8.05. 

0.125 ................................................................... 0.375 ................................................................ 3.15. 

0.175 ................................................................... 0.375 ................................................................ 0.85. 

0.225 ................................................................... 0.375 ................................................................ 0.29. 

0.275 ................................................................... 0.375 ................................................................ 0.08. 

0.325 ................................................................... 0.375 ................................................................ 0.01. 

0.375 ................................................................... Infinite ............................................................... 0.00. 

TABLE 4—CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES FOR CHEMICAL ELEMENT WEIGHT PERCENTAGES

Materials P Mn 

Plates ....................................................................................................................................................................... 0.014 1.45 

Forgings ................................................................................................................................................................... 0.016 1.11 

Welds ....................................................................................................................................................................... 0.019 1.63 

TABLE 5—MAXIMUM HEAT-AVERAGE RESIDUAL [°F] FOR RELEVANT MATERIAL GROUPS BY NUMBER OF AVAILABLE DATA

POINTS (SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL = 1%) 

Material group s [°F] 

Number of available data points 

3 4 5 6 7 8 

Welds, for Cu > 0.072 .......................................................... 26.4 35.5 30.8 27.5 25.1 23.2 21.7 

Plates, for Cu > 0.072 ......................................................... 21.2 28.5 24.7 22.1 20.2 18.7 17.5 

Forgings, for Cu > 0.072 ...................................................... 19.6 26.4 22.8 20.4 18.6 17.3 16.1 

Weld, Plate or Forging, for Cu ≤ 0.072 ............................... 18.6 25.0 21.7 19.4 17.7 16.4 15.3 

TABLE 6—TMAX VALUES FOR THE

SLOPE DEVIATION TEST (SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL = 1%) 

Number of available 

data points (n) TMAX

3 ............................................ 31.82 

4 ............................................ 6.96 

5 ............................................ 4.54 

6 ............................................ 3.75 

7 ............................................ 3.36 

8 ............................................ 3.14 

TABLE 6—TMAX VALUES FOR THE

SLOPE DEVIATION TEST (SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL = 1%)—Continued 

Number of available 

data points (n) TMAX

9 ............................................ 3.00 

10 .......................................... 2.90 

11 .......................................... 2.82 

12 .......................................... 2.76 

13 .......................................... 2.72 

14 .......................................... 2.68 

TABLE 6—TMAX VALUES FOR THE

SLOPE DEVIATION TEST (SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL = 1%)—Continued 

Number of available 

data points (n) TMAX

15 .......................................... 2.65 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day 

of January 2010. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES

5498 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael T. Lesar, 

Chief, Rulemaking and Directives Branch, 

Division of Administrative Services, Office 

of Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2283 Filed 2–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

15 CFR Part 902 

50 CFR Part 648 

[Docket No. 0907281181–0040–03] 

RIN 0648–AX93 

Fisheries of the Northeastern United 

States; Reporting Requirement for 

Midwater Trawl Vessels Fishing in 

Closed Area I 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule; effectiveness of a 

collection-of-information requirement. 

SUMMARY: NMFS announces approval by 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) of a collection-of-information 

requirement contained in Northeast 

(NE) Multispecies regulations for 

midwater trawl herring vessels that fish 

in groundfish Closed Area I (CA I). The 

intent of this final rule is to implement 

these additional reporting requirements. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 5, 

2010. The amendments to 50 CFR 

648.14(r)(2)(vii) and 648.80(d)(7)(iii)(B), 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 2, 2009 (74 FR 56562), will 

become effective on March 5, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments 

regarding the burden-hour estimates or 

other aspects of the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in 

this final rule may be submitted to the 

Regional Administrator, NMFS 

Northeast Region, 55 Great Republic 

Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930 and by email to DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, 

or fax to (202) 395–7285. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Douglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst, 

(978) 281–9341, fax (978) 281–9135. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final 

rule implementing modifications to the 

Gulf of Maine/Georges Bank (GOM/GB) 

Herring Midwater Trawl Gear Letter of 

Authorization (LOA) published in the 

Federal Register on November 2, 2009 

(74 FR 56562). The measures contained 

in the rule were effective upon 

publication, with the exception of new 

requirements for vessel operators to 

complete and submit a CA I Midwater 

Trawl Released Codend Affidavit. 

Because OMB approval of the CA I 

Midwater Trawl Released Codend 

Affidavit had not been received by the 

date the final rule was published, NMFS 

delayed the effective date of the 

associated reporting requirements. 

These reporting requirements were 

detailed in the proposed rule 

(September 4, 2009; 74 FR 45798), with 

public comment accepted through 

September 27, 2009. All comments 

received on the proposed measures were 

addressed in the November 2, 2009, 

final rule and are not repeated here. 

On January 4, 2010, OMB approved, 

without change, the collection-ofinformation contained in the CA I 

Midwater Trawl Released Codend 

Affidavit. Accordingly, effective March 

5, 2010, if a vessel issued an All Areas 

and/or an Areas 2 and 3 Limited Access 

Herring Permit releases a net in CA I 

before the fish can be sampled by the 

observer, the vessel operator must 

complete and sign a CA I Midwater 

Trawl Released Codend Affidavit, as 

specified in §§ 648.14(r)(2)(vii) and 

648.80(d)(7)(iii)(B). The CA I Midwater 

Trawl Released Codend Affidavit form 

includes details of where, when, and 

why the net was released as well as a 

good-faith estimate of both the total 

weight of fish caught on that tow and 

the weight of fish released (if the tow 

had been partially pumped). The 

completed affidavit form must be 

submitted to NMFS within 48 hr of the 

completion of the trip. 

Under NOAA Administrative Order 

205–11, 7.01, dated December 17, 1990, 

the Under Secretary of Oceans and 

Atmosphere has delegated to the 

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, 

NOAA, the authority to sign material for 

publication in the Federal Register. 

Classification 

There is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 

§ 553(b)(B) to waive prior notice and an 

opportunity for public comment on this 

action, as notice and comment would be 

unnecessary and contrary to the public 

interest. This reporting requirement was 

detailed in the September 4, 2009, 

proposed rule, with public comments 

accepted through September 27, 2009. 

This reporting requirement was also 

detailed in the November 2, 2009, final 

rule, which also explained that 

implementation of the requirement was 

delayed pending OMB approval of the 

form. Therefore, the public has 

previously been provided with notice of 

this measure and opportunity to 

comment. Providing additional notice 

and comment would further delay the 

collection of bycatch discard 

information. The time required for 

additional notice and public comment 

would likely delay the implementation 

of this reporting requirement past the 

period in early spring when midwater 

trawl vessels have historically fished in 

Closed Area I. If this reporting 

requirement were not in place by that 

time, valuable information on bycatch 

discard would not be collected. The 

New England Fishery Management 

Council has expressed an interest in 

using data collected under this program 

in the current development of 

Amendment 5 to the FMP. 

This final rule has been determined to 

be not significant for purposes of 

Executive Order 12866. 

This final rule contains a new 

collection-of-information requirement 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(PRA). The new collection-ofinformation requirement pertaining to 

the CA I Midwater Trawl Released 

Codend Affidavit has been approved by 

OMB under OMB control number 0648– 

0602. Public reporting burden for these 

requirements is estimated to average 5 

min per response, including the time for 

reviewing instructions, searching 

existing data sources, gathering and 

maintaining the data needed, and 

completing and reviewing the collection 

of information. 

Send comments regarding these 

burden estimates or any other aspect of 

this data collection, including 

suggestions for reducing the burden, to 

NMFS at the ADDRESSES above, and email to DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, 

or fax to (202) 395–7285. 

Notwithstanding any other provision 

of the law, no person is required to 

respond to, and no person shall be 

subject to penalty for failure to comply 

with, a collection of information subject 

to the requirements of the PRA, unless 

that collection of information displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 902 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 28, 2010. 

Samuel D. Rauch III, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator for 

Regulatory Programs, National Marine 

Fisheries Service. 

■ For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, 15 CFR part 902 is amended 

as follows: 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES