alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

54449 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 172 

Tuesday, September 7, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8550 of August 31, 2010 

National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Each day brings new opportunities for personal growth, renewal, and transformation to millions of Americans who have chosen to forge a path toward 

recovery from addiction to drugs or alcohol. While addiction can destroy 

self-confidence, family ties, and friendships, recovery can restore the promise 

of a brighter tomorrow. During National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, we express support for those living healthy and productive 

lives in long-term recovery, we applaud those working to help struggling 

Americans break the cycle of abuse, and we encourage those in need to 

seek help. 

This year’s theme, ‘‘Join the Voices for Recovery: Now More Than Ever!,’’ 

calls us to an urgent mission—to save lives from the hazards of addiction. 

As we make quality and affordable health care more accessible to all Americans, we also resolve to build a healthier Nation by increasing access to 

treatment and recovery programs in our health care system. To help achieve 

this goal, the Affordable Care Act supports services available to address 

addiction. Together, we can reduce the harmful consequences of untreated 

addiction, such as violence, failure in school, job loss, child abuse, crimes, 

and death. I encourage all Americans to visit RecoveryMonth.gov for more 

resources and information. 

The journey to recovery requires great fortitude and a supportive network. 

As we celebrate National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 

we also express our appreciation for the family members, mutual aid groups, 

peer support programs, health professionals, and community leaders that 

provide compassion, care, and hope. Across America, we must spread the 

word that substance abuse is preventable, that addiction is treatable, and 

that recovery is possible. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2010 

as National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month. I call upon all 

Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs, ceremonies, 

and activities, and to celebrate the lives freed from addiction to illicit 

drugs, alcohol, or prescription medications. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCS
54450 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day 

of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22426 

Filed 9–3–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W0–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 26, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 26, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A23I0015. WILLIAM RIDLEY v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18CR1781 18CR1783
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No.1 to Annual Report of AmpliTech Group, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louisa Sanfratello, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: May 24, 2013
By:
/s/ Louisa SanfratelloLouisa Sanfratello

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 28, 2014



| | By: | /s/ Min Sok Randy Park                                       
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Min Sok Randy Park                                     
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the
depositor)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Michael W. Perry, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael W. Perry
---------------------------------
Michael W. Perry
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
August 1, 2003
**Subsidiaries of China United Services,Inc.**

 

ZLI Holdings Limited - Hong Kong

Zhengzhou Lian Hengfu Consulting Co.,Ltd. – PRC

Henan Law Anhou Insurance Agency Co., Ltd.(consolidated affiliate) - PRC

Sichuan Kangzhuang Insurance Agency Co. Ltd.- (conolidated affiliate) - PRC

Jiangsu Law Insruance Broker Co., Ltd. - (consolidatedaffliliate) - PRC

 

Action Holdings Financial Limited -BVI

Law Enterprise Co., Ltd. -Taiwan

Law Insurance Broker Co., Ltd. -Taiwan

Law Risk Management & Consultant Co.,Ltd. -Taiwan

Law Insurance Agent Co., Ltd. -Taiwan
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r 136221 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PHILLIP E. JONES, J ustices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136221 COA: 279712 Wayne CC: 06-634117-AH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22605]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Dates: All meetings are held at 2:30 p.m.
    Wednesday, September 1; Thursday, September 2; Tuesday, September 
7; Wednesday, September 8; Thursday, September 9; Tuesday, September 
14; Wednesday, September 15; Thursday, September 16; Tuesday, September 
21; Wednesday, September 22; Thursday, September 23; Tuesday, September 
28; Wednesday, September 29; Thursday, September 30, 2010.

PLACE:  Board Agenda Room, No. 11820,1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 
20570.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Pursuant to Sec.  102.139(a) of the Board's 
Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider ``the 
issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or 
proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or 
disposition * * * of particular representation or unfair labor practice 
proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] 
Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.'' See 
also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

    Dated: September 3, 2010.
Lester A. Heltzer,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22605 Filed 9-7-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
```
#### Mary B. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard H. SNYDER and Marion J. Snyder, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 79-3459.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued Dec. 17, 1980.

Decided Jan. 23, 1981.

*317Robert J. Potter, Bowman & Potter, Toledo, Ohio, for defendants-appellants.

Joseph R. Tafelski, James M. Klein, Toledo, Ohio, Avery Friedman, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Mary B. Johnson, sued Richard H. and Marion J. Snyder for damages and injunctive relief under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et *seq.,*and under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and § 1982, alleging that the defendants, owners of an apartment building, had refused to show her an apartment for rent because she is black. After a temporary restraining order was issued, Johnson withdrew her application for a temporary injunction when the defendants agreed to show her the apartment. The case ultimately went to trial, and the jury awarded damages in the amount of $1.00.

Thereafter plaintiff, whose complaint prayed for attorney’s fees, filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. At the time this motion for attorney’s fees was filed, the judgment on the jury verdict had become final. Plaintiff had not, pursuant to Rule 59(e), Fed.R.Civ. Proc., moved to alter or amend the judgment within ten days after her motion for a new trial had been denied and had not, pursuant to Rule 4, Fed.R.App.Proc., within thirty days thereafter, filed a notice of appeal.

Defendants contended that the district court had no authority to entertain the motion for attorney’s fees. The district court disagreed, and after a hearing, awarded such fees in the amount of $8,600.00 and costs of $118.06. 470 F.Supp. 972 (N.D. Ohio, W.D.1979). Defendants have appealed, contending, again, that the motion for attorney’s fees came too late and that, in any event, the amount awarded constituted an abuse of discretion.

We conclude that, as to the amount of the fees, such did not amount to an abuse of discretion; the award was based upon compensation at the rate of $50.00 per hour for the time consumed by the attorneys.

Defendants contend that the motion for attorney’s fees came too late because plaintiff did not timely file motion to alter or amend judgment or a notice of appeal.

On this issue, we agree with the holdings of the Fifth Circuit in *Knighton v. Watkins,*616 F.2d 795 (1980), and *Van Ooteghem*v. *Gray,*628 F.2d 488 (1980), that attorney’s fees awarded under § 1988 are awarded as costs and are not controlled by the time limitations that defendants here assert. We recognize that the First Circuit in *White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security,*629 F.2d 697 (1980), refused to follow *Knighton, supra,*but we conclude that *Knighton*is the better reasoned opinion.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Youth Programs releases applications for summer Space Camp and Aviation CampPublished March 21, 2020
                        
                        By Rachel Kersey
                        
                        
                        502nd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Applications are now available for theAir Force Youth Programs’ residential aviation camp and residential space camp, offered to Department of Defense dependents with valid identification. Applications are due April 6.
The Air Force Teen Aviation Camp will be held from June 15-21, at the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado. Space Camp will offer two sessions at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama--the first from July 19- 24 and the other from July 26-31.
Youth who will complete their freshman or sophomore year of high school this school year are eligible for Aviation Camp, which will afford them an opportunity to explore careers in the Air Force as aviators. While spending money is the responsibility of the participants, all expenses related to transportation, lodging, meals and the program itself are centrally funded.Air Force Space Camp is open to children ages 12-18 who have not graduated from high school and who wish to explore careers as astronauts. Lodging, meals, and program expenses are fully funded centrally, but transportation and spending money must be supplied by the participants.
Space Camp offers various programs for children in different age groups. Ages 12-14 will be able to participate in either the Space Academy which will give students the chance to train like astronauts, Robotics Academy which includes designing, programming and piloting robots amongst other things, or Mach II which provides hands-on activities in aeronautics, propulsion and aviation history. For a complete description of the activities see here.
For ages 15-18, Space Camp offers an Advanced Space Academy which gives students the chance to design, build and launch a rocket and scuba dive in an Underwater Astronaut Trainer, Mach III which includes participating in space training simulators, learning wilderness survival techniques and planning and executing three missions and U.S. Cyber Camp which includes a tour of Redstone Arsenal, building a Raspberry Pi computer, that students can take home, and learning coding and programming. For a complete description of the activities see here.
The PDF application can be found here. It should be completed and submitted by a parent or guardian via email to AFSVC.SVPY.Camps@us.af.mil by April 6.
For more information on the Air Force Teen Aviation & Space Camps visit https://jbsatoday.com/events/2811AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



air force youth programs 



Depart of Defense 



DOD 



Air Force Teen Aviation Camp 



United States Air Force Academy 



space camp 



Joint Base San Antonio- Lackland 



JBSA 



Aviation
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

d0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140499 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140499 

 COA: 279338 

Wayne CC: 06-013758-01 

SIRVAN RAYSHA MARTIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 15, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[No. 43551-5-I.

Division One.

May 8, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Devon Lee Kiss, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-8-03659-3, Joan E. DuBuque, J., entered October 1, 1998. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E933]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            TRIBUTE TO THE FEDERAL WORKERS IN OKLAHOMA CITY

                                 ______

                          HON. CARDISS COLLINS

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 3, 1995

  Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I rise to pay tribute to the 
Federal workers who are among the bombing victims in Oklahoma City. 
Their great sacrifice deserves our respect. Their public service 
deserves our gratitude. Their memory deserves our reflection.
  We have just begun the annual commemoration of Public Service 
Recognition Week, an occasion where Federal agencies and employee 
organizations recognize the contributions made by public servants at 
all levels of Government. The Oklahoma bombing victims are truly the 
most deserving of recognition this year. Those who were killed or 
injured while working for America, shall forever remain among our 
Nation's most honored.
  The loss of these workers reminds us that Federal service does have 
its risks, as well as its rewards. The blast hit the Alfred P. Murrah 
Federal Building just as the employees inside began another workday. 
Now many of them are gone, but they have left behind a legacy of 
service to the public that is warmly remembered by the people of 
Oklahoma City.
  Since the bombing, the Nation has witnessed the fine work of other 
Federal employees working tirelessly in Oklahoma City. During each day 
that has passed, we have seen Federal law enforcement officers 
effectively pursuing suspects and witnesses, the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency responding to the needs of Oklahoma citizens affected 
by the tragedy, and the General Services Administration's Emergency 
Operations Center coordinating the restoration of Federal agency 
operations in the area. This is Government service at its best.
  This terrible event has caused many Americans to learn more about 
Federal workers--who they are, where they live, and what they do. Let's 
remember with pride those who served and are still serving today in 
Oklahoma City. Let's also recognize that there are many more like them 
serving Americans across this land.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date:  January 14, 2015/s/ Andrew J. KandalepasName:  Andrew J. KandalepasTitle: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Investment Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 between Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date:  March 27, 2015





Entergy Louisiana, LLC, as servicer





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount





Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer