alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5725]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            APOLOGY TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

  Mr. MOYNIHAN. Mr. President, as the senior senator from the State of 
New York, and as a Democrat, I rise to offer an apology to our 
Governor, George E. Pataki, for the inexcusable conduct of the national 
chair of the Democratic National Committee yesterday in Albany.
  As has now been reported, and not disputed, Mr. Donald L. Fowler 
referred to our Governor as a ``quasi-Governor''. This, he said, is 
self-defining. ``It means almost a governor, a governor who's not quite 
there, a governor who doesn't quite have it together * * *'' Later he 
volunteered to reporters, ``You know what `quasi' means. It means half-
assed.''
  In the annals of political invective, there has been yet more vulgar 
calumny, but in this already sufficiently raucus time, this will serve. 
But will not be allowed to stand.
  Mr. Pataki is our duly elected Governor; a person of manifest ability 
and quiet dignity. It defies reason that the national chair of the 
Democratic Party should journey to the State capital for the purpose of 
summoning New Yorkers to support President Clinton in the next 
election, whilst simultaneously insulting the person New Yorkers chose 
to be Governor in the last election.
  I am sure Mr. Fowler regrets his remarks. I await his apology. And, 
to say again, tender my own on behalf of the great majority of 
Democrats who would not wish to be associated with what has now taken 
place, and who will insist that it not occur again. The President's 
task in New York will be difficult enough; that would make it 
impossible.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 35.1






SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:




(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Investment Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 between Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.




(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.




Date:  March  28, 2014




Entergy Louisiana, LLC, as servicer




By:/s/ Alyson M. Mount




Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4901]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HOUR OF MEETING ON THURSDAY, MAY 18, 1995

  Mr. ARMEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that when the House 
adjourns on Wednesday, May 17, 1995, it adjourn to meet at 9 a.m. on 
Thursday, May 18, 1995, for the purpose of receiving in this Chamber 
former Members of Congress.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2011 of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc.



|                   |  |                                                 
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2011 |  | /s/ Christopher J. Reinhard                     
|                   |  | Christopher J. Reinhard, Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Date: May 16, 2011 |  | /s/ Dennis M. Mulroy                            
|                   |  | Dennis M. Mulroy, Chief Financial Officer       

The foregoing
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or
as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Starflick.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Zoltan Nagy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 24th day of April, 2014.








ZOLTAN NAGYZoltan NagyChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23004]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, September 17, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The BBG will be considering BBG 
Governance Committee recommendations, paying a tribute to OCB Director 
Pedro Roig, and discussing the BBG's research program and matters 
concerning the BBG's draft FY 2012 annual budget. The meeting is open--
via webcast--to the public, but the portion of the meeting concerning 
the BBG's draft FY 2012 annual budget will be closed to the public 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B). The open portion of the meeting is 
available for the public to observe via streaming on the BBG's Web site 
at http://www.bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-23004 Filed 9-10-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. (the ”Company”) on
Form 10QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31,2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
Matthews, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (i)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (ii)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
 
 
 
 Dated:  August
6, 2008
 
 
 /s/ Robert Matthews
 Name:
Robert Matthews
 Title:   Chief
Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 312 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 312

   To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2013

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself and Mr. Heinrich) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Carson National Forest Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. CARSON NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Carson National Forest in the 
State of New Mexico is adjusted to incorporate the approximately 4,990 
acres of land generally depicted as ``Miranda Canyon Boundary'' on the 
map entitled ``Carson National Forest Boundary Adjustment'' and dated 
September 21, 2010.
    (b) Land and Water Conservation Fund.--For purposes of section 7 of 
the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601-9), 
the boundaries of the Carson National Forest, as modified under 
subsection (a), shall be considered to be the boundaries of the Carson 
National Forest as in existence on January 1, 1965.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE 
SHEET STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             446                     446
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,194                   3,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (577)                   (577)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,305                   3,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,520                   6,520
<PP&E>                                           1,604                   1,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (926)                   (926)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,222                   7,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,154                   4,154
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        940                     940
<COMMON>                                        12,111                  12,111
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,007)                (10,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,222                   7,222
<SALES>                                          2,122                   6,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,122                   6,581
<CGS>                                            1,301                   4,157
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,301                   4,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,477                   4,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14                       8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,670)                 (2,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,670)                 (2,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,670)                 (2,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)                  (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)                  (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22996]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9febedfefbfafef1fef3e6ecf6ecdff9f2fcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bfff9eaefeeeae5eae7f2f8e2f8cbede6e8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201202-003.
    Title: Oakland MTO Agreement.
    Parties: Eagle Marine Services, Ltd.; Ports of America Outer Harbor 
Terminal, LLC; Seaside Transportation Service LLC; SSA Terminals, LLC; 
SSA Terminals (Oakland), LLC; Total Terminals International, LLC; and 
Trapac, Inc.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street, 
NW.; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes Transbay Container Terminal, LLC as 
a party to the agreement.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: September 10, 2010.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22996 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto
Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
Exhibit 10.2

 

Letter Agreement Counter Party

 

	
Name
    	
 
    	
Title
    
	
Heilmann,   P.
    	
 
    	
SVP,   Chief Legal Officer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2947 

To amend the Federal Power Act to clarify the authority of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission to prescribe just, reasonable, and not 

unduly discriminatory or preferential terms, conditions, and compensation 

applicable to wholesale demand response resource participation in organized wholesale energy, capacity, and ancillary service markets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. HEINRICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to clarify the authority 

of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to prescribe just, reasonable, and not unduly discriminatory 

or preferential terms, conditions, and compensation applicable to wholesale demand response resource participation in organized wholesale energy, capacity, and ancillary service markets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2947 IS

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF WHOLESALE DEMAND RE2 SPONSE RESOURCES. 

3 Section 206(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

4 824e(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) by designating the first through third sen6 tences as paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively; 

7 and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(4) TREATMENT OF WHOLESALE DEMAND RE10 SPONSE RESOURCES.— 

11 ‘‘(A) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(i) DEMAND RESPONSE.—The term 

13 ‘demand response’ means a reduction in 

14 the consumption of electric energy by cus15 tomers from their expected consumption in 

16 response to an increase in the price of elec17 tric energy or to incentive payments de18 signed to induce lower consumption of elec19 tric energy. 

20 ‘‘(ii) DEMAND RESPONSE RE21 SOURCE.—The term ‘demand response re22 source’ means a resource capable of pro23 viding demand response. 

24 ‘‘(B) AUTHORITY.—The Commission may 

25 prescribe just, reasonable, and not unduly dis26 criminatory or preferential terms, conditions, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2947 IS

1 and compensation applicable to wholesale de2 mand response resource participation in orga3 nized wholesale energy, capacity, and ancillary 

4 service markets.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 13, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40580 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE SALBADOR LIRA-LOPEZ, also known as Jose Juan Uscanga-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-38-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Salbador Lira-Lopez, also known as Jose Juan Uscanga-Hernandez, appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation pursuant to an aggravated-felony conviction. He first argues, and the Government concedes, that the district court erred in calculating his criminal history score, which affected his criminal history category. Lira-Lopez admits that this error is reviewed only for plain error because he failed to challenge thatNo. 04-40580 -2- calculation in district court. When reviewing for plain error in the sentencing context, “this court has concluded that if the trial judge, on remand, could reinstate the same sentence, it will uphold the sentence imposed despite the trial court’s
error.” United States v. Leonard , 157 F.3d 343, 346 (5th Cir. 1998)(citations omitted). Despite Lira-Lopez’s arguments to the contrary, Leonard is controlling precedent and may not be overruled by this panel without en banc consideration or an intervening Supreme Court opinion. See Hogue v. Johnson , 131 F.3d 466, 491 (5th Cir. 1997). Lira-Lopez admits that, even if his criminal history score were corrected, the district court could impose the same 46-month sentence on remand. Accordingly, Lira-Lopez has not shown plain error. See id. Also for the first time on appeal, Lira-Lopez argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. He thus contends that his sentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Lira-Lopez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve hisNo. 04-40580 -3- argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.