alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 18399-8-III.

Division Three.

May 11, 2000.]

#### Kathleen Barbara Richeson, et al., *Appellants,*v. The Washington State Patrol, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 96-2-03105-3, Robert N. Hackett, Jr., J., entered April 9, 1999. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Kato, J.
#### Peoples Brewing Company of Trenton, respondent, *v.*Harris Levin and Samuel Levin, appellants.

[Argued March 9th, 1911.

Decided June 19th, 1911.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Walker.

*Mr. Franklin W. Fort,*for the appellants.

*Mr. John H. Backes,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for" the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Walker.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Sullivan — 11.

*For reversal*— -None.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period
ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael Fishman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John Viola, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ MICHAEL FISHMANName:

Michael FishmanTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 15, 2013



/S/ JOHN E. VIOLAName:

John E. ViolaTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 15, 2013

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Axim Biotechnologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), I, Robert Malasek, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

|   | (1)    | the Report, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.                      |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                         |

  

| Dated: April 15, 2022 | By:    | /s/ *Robert Malasek*                                                               |   |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | **Robert Malasek**

**Chief Financial Officer**

**(Principal Financial Officer)** |   |
**Exhibit 32.2**

   **CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

   **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

   **(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

   ****

   In connection with the annual report of mCig, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

   

   Dated: August 28, 2017

   

   /s/ Michael Hawkins

   Michael Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer

   (Principal Accounting Officer)


---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0105 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JEB EUGENE MARQUIS Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 13 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2023

09/06/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0105
#### HUNTLEY v. PANDYA

No. 441P00

Case below: 136 N.C. App. 848

Petition by defendants (Elkins, Cartee and Housing) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.
[No. 23596-0-II.

Division Two.

March 24, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Colin H. Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 97-8-01086-1, Richard D. Hicks, J., entered July 17, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, A.C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
CERTIFICATE OF KARA INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

                            A NEVADA CORPORATION,

                      PURSUANT TO SECTION 78.207 (4) OF THE

                            NEVADA REVISED STATUTES

     FIRST:     The name of the corporation is Kara International, Inc. (the 
"Company").

     SECOND:  On April 9, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company and the 
majority stockholder unanimously consented to a reverse split of the Company's 
outstanding common stock in the ratio of one new share for every five shares 
outstanding as of the date of filing of this Certificate, with fractional 
shares being rounded up to the next whole share, while retaining the current 
authorized shares and par value, with appropriate adjustments to the 
additional paid in capital and stated capital accounts of the Company.

     THIRD: The number of authorized shares and the par value of the Company's 
common stock immediately before the above-referenced resolutions were 
50,000,000 shares at one mill ($0.001), respectively.

     FOURTH: The number of authorized shares and the par value of the 
Company's common stock immediately after the above-referenced resolutions were 
50,000,000 shares and one mill ($0.001), respectively.

     FIFTH: The number of shares of the Company's common stock to be issued 
after the reverse split in exchange for each pre-split share of common stock 
is 1/5 of one share.

     SIXTH: No fractional shares will be issued as a result of the reverse 
split.  There is no provision for the payment of money or the issuance of scrip 
to stockholders otherwise entitled to a fraction of a share as a result of the 
reverse split.

     SEVENTH: The approval of the affected stockholders is not required and 
has not been sought; however, persons who own a majority of the outstanding 
voting securities of the Company have adopted, ratified and approved the 
reverse split.

     EIGHTH: The above-referenced resolutions will be effective as of the date 
of filing of this Certificate with the Secretary of State of the State of 
Nevada.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executive officers of the Company 
hereby execute this Certificate on the 10th day of April, 1997.

                                 /s/ David C. Merrell,
                                      President

                                /s/ Michael C. Brown,
                                      Secretary/Treasurer

STATE OF UTAH                 }
                               } ss
COUNTY of SALT LAKE           }

     David C. Merrell and Michael C. Brown, hereby acknowledge that they are 
the President and Secretary/Treasurer, respectively, of Kara International, 
Inc., that they have read the foregoing information, and of their personal 
knowledge, represent and warrant that such information is true and correct in 
every material respect.

                                        11
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22780]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, September 15, 2010, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Decisional Matter: Final Interpretative Rule: 
Interpretation of Children's Product.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: September 7, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22780 Filed 9-8-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 311 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 311

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating sites in the Lower Mississippi River Area in 
 the State of Louisiana as a unit of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2013

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating sites in the Lower Mississippi River Area in 
 the State of Louisiana as a unit of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Mississippi River Area Study 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (2) Study area.--The term ``study area'' includes Fort St. 
        Philip, Fort Jackson, the Head of Passes, and any related and 
        supporting historical, cultural, and recreational resources 
        located in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

SEC. 3. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which 
funds are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary, in 
consultation with the State of Louisiana and other interested 
organizations, shall complete a special resource study that evaluates--
            (1) the national significance of the study area; and
            (2) the suitability and feasibility of designating the 
        study area as a unit of the National Park System.
    (b) Criteria.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for potential 
inclusion in the National Park System in section 8(c) of National Park 
System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)).
    (c) Content.--The study described in subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include cost estimates for the potential acquisition, 
        development, operation, and maintenance of the study area; and
            (2) identify alternatives for the management, 
        administration, and protection of the study area.

SEC. 4. DONATIONS.

    The Secretary may accept the donation of funds to carry out this 
Act.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 
to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32 

Certification Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /S/ JOSHUA EASTERLY  |
|---------------------------|
| Name:                     | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:                    | Chief Executive Officer |

Date: February 19, 2020

 

| /S/ IAN SIMMONDS  |
|------------------------|
| Name:                  | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer |

Date: February 19, 2020

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1732

MR. LESTER D. FLETCHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ASHTON BALDWIN CARTER; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; DEFENSE 

COMMISSARY AGENCY DeCA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03897-PX)

Submitted: October 24, 2017 Decided: November 2, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester D. Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Anderson, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lester D. Fletcher appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 

complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 

U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017); the Rehabilitation Act of

1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2017); the 

Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012); and the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2012 & Supp. 

2017). Seven days after the district court issued its memorandum opinion dismissing the 

complaint, Fletcher filed a “response,” arguing that he was entitled to equitable tolling. 

The district court returned the pleading without consideration, explaining that the case 

was now closed. “[I]f a post-judgment motion is filed within ten days of the entry of 

judgment and calls into question the correctness of that judgment it should be treated as a 

motion under Rule 59(e), however it may be formally styled.” MLC Auto., LLC v. Town

of So. Pines, 532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008). Thus, Fletcher’s postjudgment motion is 

properly construed as a timely-filed Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.

Accordingly, we order a limited remand directing the district court to promptly 

docket Fletcher’s response as a Rule 59(e) motion and to consider the motion on its 

merits. If either party is dissatisfied after the district court disposes of the Rule 59(e) 

motion and timely files a notice of appeal or amends its current notice, Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(4)(B)(ii), any appeal from the district court’s final order will be consolidated with 

this appeal. Regardless of the outcome of the Rule 59(e) motion, the record, as 

supplemented, will be returned to this court for further consideration. 
3

In ordering this limited remand, we express no opinion as to the merits of the 

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

REMANDED
News United States Air Force
 Simulators prepare Airmen for real-world scenariosPublished July 27, 2019
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Alexandra Singer
                        
                        
                        633rd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS) --**
                A patient lies on the ground, bleeding, breathing weaker, and heart rate dropping low. It’s up to medical personnel to stabilize him before it’s too late.
And cut! The simulation is over and a briefing is given on what went right and wrong. Luckily, the patient wasn’t human but a simulator “dummy” used to prepare the 633rd Medical Group Airmen on real-world scenarios.
“They blink, they breathe,” said Raymond Jernigan, 633rd MDG simulator operator. “Even the baby simulators have motion. They cry. I can program it to talk. They can be programmed to have physiological responses – I’ll set the vital signs.”
The training with simulators usually begins with a pre-brief from Jernigan, going over how to use the simulators and what they can do.
A lot of the simulators can be used as part of the certification training, such as the Laerdal SimNewB. These are the neonatal baby simulators that prepare the labor and delivery section on the neonatal resuscitation program. They can simulate breathing and be given vitals based on the specified training for which they are used.
The 633rd MDG education and training office also uses the simulators regularly for training.
“This allows us to do things that we couldn’t really do with humans,” said Tech. Sgt. Brandon Broadbent, 633rd MDG education and training noncommissioned officer in charge. “These really allow us to simulate injuries that we couldn’t otherwise do, so that’s a significant advantage when you’re talking about prepping people for combat situations.”
Based on the training, the simulators can be programmed to have specific vital signs. Jernigan can set the heart rate, blood pressure, pulse, etc. According to the numbers set, the students will do what they need to in order to stabilize the patient.
“They’re (the simulators) used to help bring realism to training,” Jernigan said. “From my understanding, they used to have animal testing or people testing on each other. This provides a body that you can use and get a reaction from in a less stressful environment. One thing about a simulator – you can’t kill it.”
The simulator can be used for a wide range of scenarios. It can be something as simple as treating a bee sting to a mock code blue, meaning the patient is having cardiac issues. With the training on the simulators, Airmen can better prepare themselves for real-world scenarios involving trauma, illness or administering life-saving skills.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



simulators 



MDG 



Medical Group 



readiness 



technology 



certification 



neonatal 



baby 



medicine 



Patient Care 



preogram 



monitoring vitals 



Joint Base Langley-Eustis 



633 MDG 



633rd Medical Group 



innovation
[No. 23699-1-II.

Division Two.

March 31, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Miguel Perez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 95-1-00311-7, James B. Sawyer II, J., entered August 31, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Houghton, JJ.