alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      
                              The Schedule contains summary financial 
                              information extracted from the financial 
                              statements for Cambridge Advantaged Properties II
                              L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by 
                              reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000771996
<NAME>                        Cambridge Advantaged Properties II L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                MAR-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-25-1996
<CASH>                        1,339,826
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              5,805,305
<PP&E>                        118,798,514
<DEPRECIATION>                42,265,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                83,677,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         14,094,410
<BONDS>                       98,540,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                    (28,956,989)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  83,677,650
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              19,301,234
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              11,905,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            6,193,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,202,014
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               5,161,583
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  6,363,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 788
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reliv' International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Montgomery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                       RELIV' INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                  By:     /s/ Robert L. Montgomery
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Robert L. Montgomery,
                                       Chief Executive Officer
Opinion filed May 19, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-22-00074-CV

___________

JANET BIEREG, Appellant

V.

LAUREL HERNANDEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court

Howard County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-6212

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Janet Biereg, has filed in this court a motion to withdraw her 

appeal. In the motion, Appellant states that she has voluntarily vacated the premises 

that was at issue. She also states that Appellee is not opposed to the motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Appellant’s motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

May 19, 2022 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4800-H4801]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           CLEAN WATER ACT PROTECTIONS THREATENED BY H.R. 961

  (Mr. FLAKE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. FLAKE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to H.R. 961 
because I know that rolling back essential protections of the Clean 
Water Act will not contribute to the health and welfare of my 
constituents. In communities such as mine, water quality problems still 
persist. In addition to New York City-wide problems with giardia, a 
bacteria that causes stomach ailments, the families in my district 
[[Page H4801]] have had to depend on aggressive water quality 
standards, challenging the water company in court when health is 
endangered by substandard water quality. This right to appeal is 
predicated on the existence of strong enforcement water quality 
standards. Standards that H.R. 961 would roll back to erase 23 years of 
progress.
  In addition, the Sixth Congressional District of New York borders on 
Jamaica Bay, a fragile area of marshland and islands that is widely 
used for fishing and recreation. Jamaica Bay is regularly contaminated 
by raw sewage and toxins that result from combined sewer overflow 
problems and storm water. And we are not alone, a 1992 study showed 
that 14 large cities, including New York City, Atlanta, and Minneapolis 
have deposited more than 165 billion gallons of raw sewage and 
pollution into surface waters each year. For my constituents, H.R. 961 
seriously impedes any attempt to control this problem by postponing 
action to correct problems with combined sewer systems for at least 15 
years. While we wait, the health concerns about fishing grow. Jamaica 
Bay cannot wait until year 2010 for this problem to be addressed. Can 
the waters in my colleagues district wait? Oppose H.R. 961.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.a
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Roderick M. Sherwood III

Roderick M. Sherwood IIINovember 15, 2010
 *
    
    This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 473



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV No. CR-14-678
CALVIN TATUM APPELLANT V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered September 16, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2012-82] HONORABLE RICHARD L. PROCTOR, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge Appellant Calvin Tatum appeals from the Monroe County Circuit Court’s order revoking his suspended imposition of sentence (SIS). Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k), Tatum’s attorney has filed a motion to be relieved as counsel on the basis that there is no merit to the appeal. The motion is accompanied by a brief containing an abstract and addendum of the proceedings below. The no-merit brief includes all objections and motions decided adversely to Tatum, and counsel explains in the argument portion of the brief why there is nothing in the record that would arguably support an appeal. The clerk of this court served Tatum with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified him of his right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal. Tatum filed pro se points, and the State filed a response thereto. On October 23, 2012, Tatum pleaded guilty to second-degree battery, and the courtCite as 2015 Ark. App. 473

suspended imposition of his sentence for three years and ordered him to pay $400 in fines and court costs. The State filed a petition to revoke the SIS on August 20, 2013, alleging that Tatum had been arrested for, and charged with, sexual assault and rape and that he had failed to make any payments on his fine. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded that Tatum had violated at least one of the terms and conditions of his SIS and sentenced him to serve six years in prison. The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Pledger v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 317. From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, and after having considered Tatum’s pro se points for reversal, we agree with counsel that an appeal would be wholly without merit. Because we find compliance with Rule 4-3(k), we affirm the order of revocation and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. G LADWIN , C.J., and B ROWN , J., agree. Robert M. “Robby” Golden , for appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 
| March 10,   2016                |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| Via   EDGAR                          |
|                                 |
| Securities   and Exchange Commission |
| 100   F Street, N.E.                 |
| Washington,   D.C. 20549             |

 

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Enduro Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, |                               |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| N.A., Trustee for Enduro Royalty Trust     |                               |
|                                       |                               |   |
| By:                                        | /s/   SARAH NEWELL                 |   |
|                                       | **Sarah Newell**                   | ** ** |
|                                       | *Vice President and Trust Officer* | * * |
|                                            |                                    |  |  |

 

----
[No. 24322-9-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### Charboneau Excavating, Inc., *Appellant,*v. Robert Cleveland, et al., *Respondents.*Robert Cleveland, et al., *Respondents,*v. Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 97-2-02955-6, Karen B. Conoley, J., entered January 15, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J, concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Hunt, J.
Order filed July 26, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00984-CR

____________

LEANDREW RAY, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1318262

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire 

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 228th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant within 15 days of the date of this 

ordert; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the 
record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within 

thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00155-CV

ROBERT FIELDS AND JOHN FIELDS, CO-INDEPENDENT EXECUTORS OF 

THE ESTATE OF JAMES R. FIELDS, DECEASED, Appellants

V.

MARY ELIZABETH LEE FIELDS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-52159

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 17, 2011. The clerk’s record 

was filed March 22, 2012. On April 12, 2012, this court abated this case for mediation. 

On June 26, 2012, the mediator reported that the case had settled in mediation. On 

September 13, 2012, this court sent correspondence to the parties requesting a dispositive 

motion or motion to dismiss. No dispositive motion was filed.
2

On October 18, 2012, this court issued an order stating that unless appellants

submitted a brief on or before November 15, 2012, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellants filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Juan Negrete

Appellate case number: 01-19-00357-CR

Trial court case number: 1524468

Trial court: 263rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief 

is now due November 13, 2019. No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _________/s/ Julie Countiss______________________________

Acting individually

Date: _November 19, 2019________________
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I,
Solin Hoem, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Glorywin Entertainment Group
Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Glorywin Entertainment Group Inc.



|Date: June 15, 2022 |  | /s/ Solin Hoem          | 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|                    |  | Solin Hoem              | 
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1


March 12, 2015


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:


(1)    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Sarah C. NewellSarah C. NewellVice President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4516]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              UNITED STATES-JAPAN AUTO PARTS NEGOTIATIONS

  (Mr. REGULA asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. REGULA. Mr. Speaker, the meetings that begin today in Canada 
between the world's four economic powers mark another critical juncture 
in this country's ongoing effort to level the playing field for 
Japanese-American automotive trade. Although progress has been made in 
this area since talks began 4 years ago, much remains to be done.
  This is not a question of demanding one-sided concessions: an 
improved trade situation is in the interest of both countries. Motor 
vehicle and equipment manufacturing is the largest U.S. manufacturing 
industry, and a cornerstone of America's industrial base. The ``Big 
Three'' alone--Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors--employ almost 
700,000 Americans, and are among the largest employers of research 
engineers and scientists in the country. Thus the health of the U.S. 
auto industry has far-reaching implications for the larger U.S. economy 
and its competitiveness. Japan stands to gain, as well, including 
Japanese consumers, who currently pay prices for auto parts that are on 
average 340 percent higher than for identical parts in the United 
States.
  Resolution of this crucial imbalance can set an important precedent, 
not only for anyone seeking access to Japan's markets, but also for 
American access to and competitiveness in other critical markets 
overseas. I strongly urge Ambassador Kantor to continue his effective 
leadership on this issue. I am confident that with a healthy balance of 
trade, this important relationship can flourish rather than flounder.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dial Global, Inc. (formerly Westwood One, Inc.) (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Spencer Brown Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/S/ Spencer Brown         
|Spencer Brown             
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|March 28, 2012            



|* | This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dial Global, Inc. and will be retained by Dial Global, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
News United States Air Force
 America Strong: Blue Angels, Thunderbirds to conduct multi-city flyovers championing National Unity Behind Frontline RespondersPublished April 25, 2020
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS)  --**
                In a show of national solidarity, the Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron, theBlue Angels, and the Air Force Air Demonstration Squadron, the **Thunderbirds**, will conduct a series of multi-city flyovers over the next two weeks.

America Strong is a collaborative salute from the Navy and Air Force to recognize healthcare workers, first responders, and other essential personnel while standing in solidarity with all Americans during the**COVID-19** pandemic.

“We’re excited to fly over cities across America as our way of saying thanks to the healthcare workers, first responders, and all the people who selflessly run into the breach working to keep America strong,” said **Air Force Chief of Staff****Gen. David L. Goldfein**, and **Chief of Naval OperationsAdm. Michael Gilday**. “This is also our way of showing that we are all in this together and that America’s spirit will prevail.”

The two demonstration teams will fly over areas of the country hardest hit by COVID-19, starting next week as both joint and individual team flights occurring every one-to-two days until mid-May.

The Air Force and Navy have partnered with local governments and media outlets to help ensure spectators followCenters for Disease Control and Prevention social distancing guidelines. Both teams are also implementing various measures to maintain personnel and community safety. This includes air-to-air refueling during transit and no scheduled stops en route to reduce potential exposure to the virus.

The Blue Angels, based atNaval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, and Thunderbirds, based atNellis Air Force Base, typically fly at more than 30 air shows each year to demonstrate American military aviation. This year, both teams have been forced to cancel many performances in response to Department of Defense direction resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak.

While America Strong will showcase theDepartment of Defense support to healthcare workers, first responders, military, essential employees, and aims to unite all Americans in the fight against COVID-19, it also fulfills critical training requirements for both teams. Pilots must execute a minimum number of flight hours to maintain proficiency. These flyovers will incur no additional cost to taxpayers.

In order to reach the maximum number of Americans, some portions of America Strong will feature only the Blue Angels or the Thunderbirds, while others will include both teams flying in their signature Delta formations simultaneously.

More information will be provided on dates and locations.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Thunderbirds 



blue angels 



America 



strong 



COVID-19 



Department of Defense 



Aerial Demonstrations 



flyovers 



Navy