alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E939]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  A TRIBUTE TO THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES WHO LOST THEIR LIVES IN OKLAHOMA 
                                  CITY

                                 ______

                       HON. CONSTANCE A. MORELLA

                              of maryland

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 3, 1995
  Mrs. MORELLA. Mr. Speaker, it is with great sadness that I rise to 
honor the dedicated Federal employees who lost their lives in bomb 
blast at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. We 
will long remember these civil servants who paid the highest price for 
their commitment to public service.
  One such dedicated public servant killed in the bomb blast was Secret 
Service agent Alan Whicher. Agent Whicher was a native of Maryland and 
lived in the town of Rockville, MD, until last October when he was 
transferred to Oklahoma City. While he was in Washington, Alan Whicher 
was assigned to protect the President. The transfer to America's 
heartland was viewed as a safer and less hectic assignment.
  Alan Whicher was brought back home to Maryland to be buried. A wake 
was held at St. Patrick's Catholic Church in Rockville, where he 
stopped each morning before he went to work. Former neighbors, 
relatives, and colleagues poured into the church to pay their last 
respects.
  President Clinton and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton attended the 
funeral. Alan Whicher was described by his former neighbors and friends 
as a man who cared deeply about his community. He was a loving husband 
to his wife, Pamela, and he was a devoted father to his three children. 
One of his last acts was to call his wife, who was about to give a 
speech at their new church, to offer encouragement and to wish her 
well.
  Alan Whicher was a hero. All of the Federal employees who died in the 
ugly bomb blast in Oklahoma City were heroes. They were Americans who 
worked hard in unglamorous jobs to improve the quality of life for 
others. They were men and women who upheld the virtues of thrift and 
hard work to achieve economic independence. Their lives will not have 
been in vain if we can translate what happened in Oklahoma City into 
something that brings the whole country together.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.a
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ Roderick M. Sherwood III

Roderick M. Sherwood IIIAugust 19, 2010
 *
    
    This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3895

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Christopher McFarlane, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 13, 2004

Filed: September 20, 2004 

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BRIGHT, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Christopher McFarlane pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute more than five hundred grams of cocaine, and possession of firearms during

a drug-trafficking offense. The district court*

 sentenced McFarlane to 110 months in

prison. We affirmed McFarlane’s sentence. United States v. McFarlane, 309 F.3d

510 (8th Cir. 2002). The Government later filed a motion to reduce McFarlane’s

sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) based on McFarlane’s
-2-

“significant and substantial cooperation” after his sentencing. The district court

reduced McFarlane’s sentence to 100 months in prison. 

On appeal, McFarlane’s attorney filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), asserting the court should have granted a greater reduction, and

moving to withdraw as appointed counsel. We lack jurisdiction to review the extent

of the district court’s departure, however. United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598,

599 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (challenge to extent of district court’s departure on

Government’s Rule 35(b) motion is unreviewable). 

Having reviewed the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus dismiss McFarlane’s appeal for lack of

jurisdiction, and grant his attorney’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4549]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of 
January 4, 1995, the Chair will now recognize Members from lists 
submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour 
debates. The Chair will alternate recognition between the parties, with 
each party limited to not to exceed 30 minutes, and each Member except 
the majority and minority leader limited to not to exceed 5 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Goss] for 5 
minutes.

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the  annual report of FLINT INT’L SERVICES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the yearended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.

 

 

Dated:  December 23, 2013

 

/s/ Russell Hiebert

 

Name: Russell Hiebert

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Dated:  December 23, 2013

 

/s/ Russell Hiebert

 

Name: Russell Hiebert

Title: Chief Financial Officer
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 6, 2014

No. 04-13-00637-CR

Jeffrey THEISEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR2446

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed on May 5, 2014. The State’s first motion 

for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to June 4, 2014. On 

June 5, 2014, the State filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief 

until July 3, 2014, for a total extension of sixty days. The motion is GRANTED. THIS IS THE 

FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE STATE WILL BE GRANTED. The State’s 

brief must be filed by July 3, 2014

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 33.1
 REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA
 FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
 Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:
 (1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);
 (2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;
 (3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2019, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and
 (4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.
 
 
 Date:  March 27, 2020
 Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer
 By  /s/ Steven C. McNeal
 
 Name:  Steven C. McNeal
 Title:   Vice President and Treasurer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2624 

To provide additional visas for the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2014 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide additional visas for the Afghan Special Immigrant 

Visa Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Afghan Allies Protec5 tion Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Section 602(b)(3)(D) of the Afghan Allies Protection 

9 Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended to read as 

10 follows: 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2624 IS

1 ‘‘(D) ADDITIONAL FISCAL YEAR.—The 

2 total number of principal aliens who may be 

3 provided special immigrant status under this 

4 section in fiscal year 2014 may not exceed 

5 4,000, except that, notwithstanding any other 

6 provision of this section— 

7 ‘‘(i) any unused balance of the total 

8 number of principal aliens who may be 

9 provided special immigrant status under 

10 this section in fiscal year 2014 may be car11 ried forward and provided through Decem12 ber 31, 2016; 

13 ‘‘(ii) the 1-year period during which 

14 an alien must have been employed in ac15 cordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) shall be 

16 the period beginning on October 7, 2001, 

17 and ending on December 31, 2014; and 

18 ‘‘(iii) the principal alien seeking spe19 cial immigrant status under this subpara20 graph shall apply to the Chief of Mission 

21 in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not 

22 later than December 31, 2014.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Dec. 20Published Dec. 20, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Samantha Ducker
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look Around the Air Force, the Silver Star Medal is awarded to a special tactics chief master sergeant, the Pacific Air Forces commander visits the Philippines and MQ-9 Reapers are used to track wildfires in southern California. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Samantha Ducker.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- Finding the way: Special tactics chief awarded Silver Star
- Strength of U.S./Philippine alliance showcased during PACAF commander visit
- National Guardsmen on firewatch in California skiesATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



Pacific Air Forces 



PACAF 



Philippines 



MQ-9 Reaper 



wildfires 



California 



Silver Star 



Air Force Special Operations Command 



AFSOC 



combat control 



Air Force 



AF 



Air Force TV
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2793 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

AN ACT 

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to Henry 

Johnson. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2793 RFH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

2 OF HONOR TO HENRY JOHNSON FOR ACTS OF 

3 VALOR DURING WORLD WAR I. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith5 standing the time limitations specified in section 3744 of 

6 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

7 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

8 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

9 the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to 

10 Henry Johnson for the acts of valor during World War 

11 I described in subsection (b). 

12 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

13 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Henry 

14 Johnson while serving as a member of Company C, 369th 

15 Infantry Regiment, 93rd Division, American Expedi16 tionary Forces, during combat operations against the 

17 enemy on the front lines of the Western Front in France 

18 on May 15, 1918, during World War I for which he was 

19 previously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. 

Passed the Senate September 18, 2014. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6015]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      RECESS UNTIL 9 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I now ask unanimous consent that the Senate stand in 
recess under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 9:08 p.m., recessed until 
Wednesday, May 3, 1995, at 9 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997, THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                  9,924
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         300,140<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                           73,529
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      191,820
<PP&E>                                                633,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                        312,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        794,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 185,861
<BONDS>                                               357,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  125
<OTHER-SE>                                            218,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          794,823
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      177,321
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         109,136<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        9,661<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       25,537
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     11,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         2,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                              100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED IN THE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM INSTALLMENT
CONTRACTS RECEIVABLE LINES IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS NET OF UNEARNED FINANCE CHARGES.
<F2>THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED IN THE FITNESS CENTER OPERATIONS LINE AND THE
ADVERTISING LINE IN THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
<F3>THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED IN THE MEMBER PROCESSING AND COLLECTION CENTERS
LINE ON THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4792]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Norwood). Under a previous order of the 
House, the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Menendez] is recognized for 5 
minutes.

  [Mr. MENENDEZ addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extension of Remarks.]
                              {time}  2230

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Hilliard] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. HILLIARD. Mr. Speaker, today, I rise to discuss what occurred in 
my congressional district 30 years ago this week. During that time in 
Selma, AL, a young black man named Jimmy Lee Jackson was murdered 
because he dared to stand up against the multitudes of racial 
injustices, from white-only water fountains to the States-rights stand 
which would not allow blacks to vote.
  Fortunately, Jimmy Lee Jackson's murder in 1965 was not in vain. It 
prompted the historic 54 mile Selma to Montgomery voting rights march, 
which was the catalyst for the 1965 Voting Rights Act. This act secured 
the rights of all Americans to participate, without harassment, in the 
political system.
  Today, we again have challenges before us which threaten the basic 
rights of many Americans. The so-called Republican Contract With 
America threatens to take away many rights which we, as Americans, hold 
dear.
  I am speaking of the right to have proper medical care, the right to 
proper nutrition, the right to a good education, and the right to be 
treated equally and fairly under the law.
  Mr. Speaker, I hope and pray that it does not take a murder like 
Jimmy Lee Jackson's, which occurred over 30 years ago in Selma, to wake 
up America to action.

                          ____________________
```
#### Isaac Murphy v. Moses Myre et al.

*Log lien.*

This case is ruled by the decision in *Appleman v. Myre, ante,*359.

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.)

Argued February 7, 1889.

Decided April 12, 1889.

Proceedings for enforcement of log lien. Defendant log-owners bring error.

Reversed as to lien.

The facts are stated in *Appleman v. Myre, ante,*359.

*De Long & O’Hara,*for appellants.

*Chamberlain & Sessions,*for plaintiff.

Long, J.

This case was heard in this Court with that of Charles Appleman against the same parties as defendants, *ante,*359, and involves the same questions which are disposed of in that case.

The judgment in this case of the circuit and justice’s court, so far as it attempts to fix or enforce a lien upon the logs described therein, is set aside and held for naught. The log-owners will recover costs of all the courts.

Morse, Champlin, and Campbell, JJ., concurred.
News United States Air Force
 AFLCMC delivers final F-15SA to Royal Saudi Air ForcePublished Dec. 11, 2020
                        
                        By Daryl Mayer
                        
                        
                        Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The final F-15SA advanced fighter aircraft were delivered Dec. 10 to the Royal Saudi Air Force – a key milestone supporting the National Defense Strategy imperative to strengthen alliances and attract new partners.
As the organization responsible for delivering new capabilities to the warfighter, the **Air Force Life Cycle Management Center** manages nearly all Foreign Military Sales cases for the Air Force. These cases enhance the defense capabilities of, and improve interoperability with, international partners to strengthen future coalition operations and act as a force multiplier for the Air Force.
The production ferry flight marks the final deliveries of the Boeing-produced aircraft included in the terms of a $29 billion foreign military sales agreement reached in 2010.
The F-15SA is an advanced version of the F-15S currently operated by the Royal Saudi Air Force.
“The **F-15 Strike Eagle** is a world-renowned dual role fighter with an already exemplary reputation. These dramatically advanced versions of that battle-tested platform provide a strong deterrent capability to potential aggressors and strengthen our long and important relationship with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” said Col. Ronald E. Dunlap III, AFLCMC F-15SA Security Assistance program manager. “I’m extremely proud of our AFLCMC team working with Boeing and alongside the Royal Saudi Air Force over the past several years to deliver this vital capability.”
The new aircraft sports a digital electronic warfare suite, fly-by-wire flight control system, an infrared search-and-track system, Active Electronically Scanned Array radar, advanced cockpit displays and Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing Systems among many other advancements.
In addition to the new aircraft, the FMS case also includes associated spares, stores, simulators, training, technical documentation, base construction and other related logistical and program support.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFLCMC 



Wright-Patterson AFB 



Royal Saudi Air Force 



NDS 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



F-15SA 



Aircraft 



One Air Force 



foreign military sales 



Strike Eagle 



force multiplier
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALI BADI MUHAMMED.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.