alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Services Center launches online food ordering pilot program at NAF operationsPublished Sept. 9, 2020
                        
                        By Julie Tinseth
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                As part of the**Air Force Services Center**’s enterprise-wide e-commerce initiative, the Nonappropriated Fund, or NAF, Food and Beverage Branch is launching a pilot program bringing online food ordering and pickup to NAF food operations.



“Online ordering is one of several e-commerce solutions AFSVC is working to solve challenges force support squadron operations are facing in the new COVID-19 environment,” said Jonathon Boyd, AFSVC chief of NAF food and beverage operations. "We’re doing all that we can to serve our community at a time when delivery and pickup have become lifelines for customers to access a meal safely and affordably.”



“The new system gives NAF operations a streamlined, transparent ordering process through the current point-of-sale system,” said Jeffery Yager, NAF food and beverage project manager. “From the moment you press ‘place order’ to the moment you pick up your order, the experience is seamless to the customer.”



The new initiative launched in July 2020, with**Air Force Global Strike Command** installations being the first to test the online food-ordering system. Installations taking part in the pilot program began with **Dyess Air Force Base** followed by **Ellsworth AFB**, South Dakota; **Minot AFB**, North Dakota; **F.E. Warren AFB**, Wyoming; **Whiteman AFB**, Missouri; **Kirtland AFB**, New Mexico; **Barksdale AFB**, Louisiana; and **Malmstrom AFB**, Montana.



When will this new online food ordering system be available Air Force-wide? According to Mr. Boyd, “We expect to move quickly to other AFGSC bases and, eventually, bring this capability to the entire NAF food and beverage enterprise.” Following the pilot, there will be some time to allow for an assessment on the best way forward to deploy Air Force-wide.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Services Center 



AFSVC 



Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center 



AFIMSC 



NAF 



nonappropriated fund 



pilot program 



online food ordering 



e-commerce 



JB San Antonio-Lackland 



Food and Beverage
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E996]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          HONORING DR. MARIO SALVADORI, DISTINGUISHED EDUCATOR

                                 ______

                         HON. GARY L. ACKERMAN

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 10, 1995
  Mr. ACKERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I join today with my constituents in the 
Fifth Congressional District of New York City recognizing Dr. Mario 
Salvadori.
  For more than two decades, Dr. Salvadori has distinguished himself 
with effective efforts to help his students discover and understand 
mathematics and science through the wonders of architechure and 
engineering.
  Mr. Speaker, in April 1975, Dr. Salvadori boldly accepted the 
challenge issued by the New York Academy of Science to ``do something 
to improve mathematics and science education'' in the public schools of 
New York City by volunteering to teach an innovative course, ``Why 
Buildings Stand Up.'' to 30 disadvantaged seventh-grade students.
  Throughout the years, Dr. Salvadori has continued to teach and write 
books of children and instructional manual for teachers. At the same 
time, he has developed an exciting, innovative, and effective program 
of hands-on activities base upon the familiar urban built environment. 
Eight years ago, he founded the Salvadori Education Center on the Built 
Environment [SECBE] to expand the reach of his innovative pedagogy and 
instructional materials. SECBE has now grown into a nationally known 
influence for the improvement of science and mathematics education.
  In the 20 years since Dr. Salvadori began this noble cause, more than 
600 teachers have incorporated the Salvadori methodology into their 
classroom practice. More than 100,000 students in New York City alone 
have benefited from their involvement in SECBE programs, demonstrating 
significant improvement in their mathematics and science studies, and 
increased motivation to remain in school.
  In addition to the effective impact Dr. Salvadori has made upon our 
educational system, he has emerged as a major force in the field of 
architecture and engineer. As a partner and chairman of the board of 
Weidlinger Associates, Consulting Engineers, he has had a role in 
developing and constructing buildings all over the world. He was served 
on the staffs of Columbia, Princeton and the University of Rome. His 
publications in the fields of applied mathematics and architecture have 
been distributed world wide in over a dozen languages. Dr. Salvadori's 
colleagues have long recognized his brilliance, and he has received 
numerous medals and awards in architecture and engineering.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask all my colleagues in the House of Representatives 
to join with me this day in recognizing Dr. Mario Salvadori, a 
dedicated educator, a leading architect, and a person who unselfishly 
gives of his many talents.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2933 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2933

    To prohibit the unauthorized use of electronic tracking devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2014

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the unauthorized use of electronic tracking devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNAUTHORIZED USE OF ELECTRONIC TRACKING 
              DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Part 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting after chapter 119 the following:

                   ``CHAPTER 120--ELECTRONIC TRACKING

``SEC. 2601. PROHIBITION ON UNAUTHORIZED ELECTRONIC TRACKING.

    ``(a) Definition.--In this section, the term `electronic tracking 
device' means a device attached to a motor vehicle or other vehicle 
that reveals the location or movement of the device through the 
transmission of electronic signals.
    ``(b) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (c), it shall 
be unlawful to knowingly use an electronic tracking device--
            ``(1) to determine the location or movement of an 
        individual; and
            ``(2) with the intent to place the individual under 
        surveillance without the consent of the individual.
    ``(c) Exceptions.--The prohibition under subsection (b) shall not 
apply to the use of an electronic tracking device--
            ``(1) on a motor vehicle or other vehicle if the registered 
        owner, lessor, or lessee of the vehicle has consented to the 
        use of the electronic tracking device on the vehicle;
            ``(2) by a law enforcement agency if the use is not 
        otherwise prohibited by law;
            ``(3) by an individual to track a dependent of the 
        individual; or
            ``(4) to reasonably protect the health or safety of the 
        individual being tracked.
    ``(d) Penalty.--Any person who violates subsection (b) shall be 
fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of chapters for 
part 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to chapter 119 the following:

``120.  Electronic tracking.................................    2601''.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7441** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL ANTONIO GALLOWAY, a/k/a Yoda , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Cour t for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00309

- WO

- 1; 1:09

- cv - 00298

- WO

- PTS )

Submitted : January 31, 2011 Decided: February 2 4, 2011

Before SHEDD , DUNCAN , and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Antonio Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Antonio Galloway seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circui t justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the distr ict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (20 00); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Galloway has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK DANIEWICZ.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (#1110).                    

*Date and Time:*                         October 6, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

October 7, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

*Place:*                         Hotel Boulderado, 2115 13th Street, Boulder, CO 80302.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Chuck Liarakos, National Science Foundation, Room 605, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Tel No.: (703) 292-8400.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         The Advisory Committee for BIO provides advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities of the divisions that make up BIO.                    

## AGENDA

### October 6, 2010

*AM:*                         Introductions and Updates; Presentation and Discussion—Innovation Experiments; Research Resources.                    

*PM:*                         Presentation and Discussion—Science, Arts and Humanities Symposium; COV Reports; COV Updates; New Ideas; Recognition of Departing BIO AC Members.                    

### October 7, 2010

National Ecological Observatory Network, Inc.: NEON Overview and Status, Discussion and Presentation; Tours of NEON Technical Facility and Table Mountain Prototype Site.

 Dated: September 8, 2010.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-22697 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
NBL-2014.10.21_EXH 10.1






Exhibit 10.1
TERMINATION OF
CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT




THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between NOBLE ENERGY, INC. (“Employer”), a Delaware corporation, and DAVID L. STOVER (“Executive”),
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, Employer and Executive entered into a Change of Control Agreement dated July 27, 2004, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008, and as subsequently amended thereafter (the “Change of Control Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Employer has established the Noble Energy, Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan for Executives (the “Plan”) to provide for the payment of severance benefits to eligible employees of Employer and its participating affiliates upon certain terminations of employment following a change in the control of Employer; and
WHEREAS, Executive presently is ineligible to participate in the Plan because Executive is a party to the Change of Control Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Employer and Executive now desire to terminate the Change of Control Agreement effective as of October 21, 2014 so that upon such termination Executive will become a Covered Employee (within the meaning of the Plan) who is eligible to participate in the Plan; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties hereto do hereby agree and acknowledge as follows:
1.    Executive and Employer hereby agree that the Change of Control Agreement is hereby terminated and canceled in its entirety effective as of October 21, 2014, and effective immediately upon such termination Executive will become a Covered Employee (within the meaning of the Plan) who is eligible to participate in the Plan in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan.
2.    Executive hereby acknowledges that Executive has received and reviewed a copy of the Plan, and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions of the Plan.



























IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties on this 21st day of October, 2014.
        


EMPLOYER:


NOBLE ENERGY, INC.




By: /s/ A. Lee Robison            
		
	A.
	LEE ROBISON


Senior Vice President




EXECUTIVE:




/s/ David L. Stover                
DAVID L. STOVER
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDG Environmental, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John C.
Regan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John C. Regan



John C. Regan
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

September 14, 2002





                                       16
News United States Air Force
 ACC commander discusses the warfighter's edgePublished Feb. 23, 2018
                        
                        By Senior Airman Jordan Garner
                        
                        
                        Air Combat Command Public Affairs
                **ORLANDO, Fla. (AFNS)  --**
                The commander of Air Combat Command, Gen. Mike Holmes, discussed the importance of taking the lead in warfighting through innovation at the 2018 Air Force Association Air Warfare Symposium in Orlando, Florida, Feb. 23, 2018.
Holmes said rising near-peer threats, combined with aging infrastructure and new global challenges, means the gap between the Air Force and its competitors is closing. He described war as infinite, with the staying power of the service required to keep its advantage.
“We need to ask ourselves how we stay committed in an infinite game,” he said. “The winner will be determined by who gives up first.”
Adversaries are using conventional, unconventional and irregular means to gain the edge in the fight, he said.
Holmes explained that innovation in our Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance enterprise such as Project Maven, which uses computer algorithms and artificial intelligence to sort the vast amounts of data the Air Force collects, will be key to keeping the warfighting edge.
Specifically in the Air Force, Holmes pointed to light attack experimentation as an innovative way to prepare for the long term.
“The light attack experiment isn’t just for today’s fight, it’s about helping us free up other weapon systems to regain conventional forces readiness in the future,” he said.
Ultimately, he said, the Air Force must adopt a culture where ideas aren’t bogged down in bureaucracy and Airmen are provided opportunities to innovate.
“We’re committed to creating an environment where Airmen and families thrive, not just survive,” he said. “If we are going to stay in this fight and win, the warfighter’s edge is you.”Air Combat Command 



ACC 



COMACC 



AFA 



Air Force Association 



innovation 



Project Maven 



Light Attack Experiment 



Air Force 



Warfighting
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force delays mandatory wear-date for OCP items, 2PFDU

              - Published  May 27, 2020
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Sahara L. Fales                                                    
              - Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **
In an effort to reduce unnecessary stress on Airmen and Space professionals during **COVID-19** restrictions, several uniform changes scheduled to become mandatory for the Operational Camouflage Pattern and Two-Piece Flight Duty Uniform (2PFDU) on June 1, have been delayed to Sept. 1.The changes for each uniform are detailed in *Air Force Instruction 36-2903*, “*Dress and Appearance of Air Force Personnel*.” Mandatory wear of the Operational Camouflage Pattern Uniform remains April 2021.The changes that become mandatory on Sept. 1 for the OCP include:
            - Officer rank insignia will be spice brown (exception: first lieutenant and lieutenant colonel rank insignia will be black).    
            - The U.S. flag patch will be mandatory and the only authorized color is spice brown (cloth). Airmen will wear the flag while in garrison and deployed. Infrared U.S. flags are not authorized.    
            - The authorized T-shirt color will be coyote brown (listed as Tan 499 per AAFES nomenclature) only. If purchasing coyote brown shirts from outside retailers, uniformed members should ensure the color matches the authorized coyote brown color (Tan 499).    
            - The authorized socks will be DLA-issued green socks or coyote brown only.    
            - The authorized boot color will be coyote brown only. The two exceptions are for Airmen with a medical condition as determined by medical authorities at a civilian or military treatment facility and approved by the commander, and those who must wear black combat boots in industrial areas.

The changes that become mandatory on Sept. 1 for the 2PFDU include:
            - All mandatory wear badges must be in place.    
            - The cloth U.S. flag will be the spice brown color only.    
            - The authorized socks will be DLA-issued green socks or coyote brown only.    
            - The authorized boot color will be coyote brown only.    
            - The only authorized color for thermal undergarments will be coyote brown.

For more information, please review *Air Force Instruction 36-2903*, “*Dress and Appearance of Air Force Personnel*,” or visit **https://www.afpc.af.mil/Career-Management/Dress-and-Appearance/**.

LRUSAFAFAir ForceAir Force’s Personnel CenterAFPCOperational Camouflage PatternOCPAFI 36-2903Dress and Appearance of Air Force PersonnelTwo-Piece Flight Duty Uniform2PFDUmandatory wear dateofficer rank insigniacoyote brownTan 499aafesDLAshirtssocksU.S. insignia patchspice brown
[No. 44572-3-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stephen M. Simmons, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-00450-5, Brian D. Gain, J., entered April 1, 1999. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven P.
Wyandt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Nitches, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended November 30, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Nitches, Inc.

|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: January 24,
      2008 
|                             
|/s/ Paul M. Wyandt           
|                             
|Paul M.
      Wyandt         
|Chief Financial
      Officer

This certification is furnished pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Nitches, Inc. for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in to any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Nitches, Inc.
specifically incorporates it by reference.

25

---