S6560 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE May 11, 1995 

Symphony Orchestra Hall and cochair 

of the Greater Detroit Inter-faith 

Roundtable of the National Conference 

of Christians and Jews. An EnglishAmerican who also has Cornish, Irish, 

Dutch, and Scottish heritage, she is 

the widow of Richard VanDusen, 

former chairman of the Greater Detroit 

Chamber of Commerce. Holder of a 1949 

bachelor’s degree from Smith College, 

she has also been involved in numerous 

community organizations as a trustee 

of the Community Foundation for 

Southeastern Michigan and as a member of the governing boards of the 

Michigan Nature Conservancy and the 

World Wildlife Fund. 

I know my Senate colleagues and the 

people of Michigan join me in congratulating these distinguished members of the metropolitan Detroit community. Their commitment to their 

communities and to public service is an 

example to us all. We thank them for 

their extraordinary efforts.

f 

∑ 

TRIBUTE TO THE VOLUNTEERS OF 

HOSPICE CARE, INC. 

∑ Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I 

rise today to acknowledge the volunteers of Hospice Care and their longtime commitment to care for people 

with life-threatening illnesses. Founded in 1981, Hospice Care, Inc., of Connecticut has been providing patients 

and their families with medical care 

and other support services that are 

crucial during difficult times. For over 

a decade these highly trained volunteers, along with the organization’s 

professionals, have provided more than 

2,000 patients and their loved ones with 

home care, inpatient care, and assistance whenever needed. Volunteers are 

also involved in administrative work, 

public awareness, fundraising, and act 

on the board of directors. 

Many of the volunteers have been 

dedicated to the organization since its 

founding and will continue to give 

their time and energy to help their fellow residents of Connecticut. With 

their hard work and dedication they 

have provided important medical and 

moral support to those who are ill or 

suffer from the loss of a loved one. 

Through their selfless behavior the volunteers of Hospice Care Inc. have positively influenced the lives of many 

members of their communities. 

I am proud to acknowledge the success and commitment of Hospice Care’s 

volunteers. They have shown what can 

be achieved with private initiative and 

have thereby contributed to the welfare of Connecticut.

f 

∑ 

COMMENDING REBECCA S. FINLEY 

∑ Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I am 

delighted today to bring to the attention of my colleagues the installation 

next month of Rebecca S. Finley, 

Pharm.D, M.S., as the president of the 

American Society of Health-System 

Pharmacists at the society’s 52d annual meeting in Philadelphia. 

ASHP is the 30,000-member national 

professional association that represents pharmacists who practice in 

hospitals, health maintenance organizations, long-term facilities, home care 

agencies, and other components of 

health care systems. 

Early in her career, Dr. Finley made 

the professional commitment to practice, research, write, and teach pharmacy in the challenging field of clinical oncology. She currently directs 

the section of pharmacy services and is 

associate professor of oncology at the 

University of Maryland Cancer Center 

in Baltimore. She holds an appointment as associate professor in the department of clinical pharmacy at the 

university’s school of pharmacy. 

Dr. Finley received her bachelor of 

science and doctor of pharmacy degrees 

from the University of Cincinnati and a 

master of science in institutional pharmacy from the University of Maryland. 

On behalf of my colleagues, Mr. 

President, I want to extend my best 

wishes to Dr. Finlay in her tenure as 

president of ASHP. I look forward to 

working with her and the society on 

health care issues in the years to 

come.∑ 

f 

NOMINATION OF JOHN M. DEUTCH, 

OF MASSACHUSETTS, TO BE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 

∑ Mr. MOYNIHAN. Mr. President, I 

thank my gallant friend from Nebraska. I rise in support of the position 

he has taken and also that of the distinguished chairman of the committee, 

the Senator from Pennsylvania. 

In the 103d Congress and then the 

104th, I offered legislation that would 

basically break up the existing Central 

Intelligence Agency and return its 

component parts to the Department of 

Defense and the Department of State. 

This in the manner that the Office of 

Strategic Services was divided and parceled out at the end of World War II. 

I had hoped to encourage a debate on 

the role of intelligence and of secrecy 

in American society. That debate has 

taken place. Some of the results, I 

think, can be seen in the nomination of 

a distinguished scientist and public 

servant, John Deutch, to this position. 

This could not have been more clear 

in his testimony. He made a point, selfevident we would suppose, but not frequently to be encountered in a pronouncement of a potential DCI. He 

said: 

Espionage does not rest comfortably in a 

democracy. Secrecy, which is essential to 

protect sources and methods, is not welcome 

in an open society. If our democracy is to 

support intelligence activities, the people 

must be confident that our law and rules will 

be respected. 

It may have come as a surprise—although it ought not to have—in recent 

months and weeks, to find how many 

persons there are in this country who 

do not have confidence that our laws 

and rules will be respected; who see the 

Government in conspiratorial modes, 

directed against the people in ways 

that could be of huge consequence to 

Americans. 

Richard Hofstadter referred to this 

disposition when he spoke of ‘‘The 

Paranoid Style in American Politics.’’

Thus, for example, the widespread belief that the CIA was somehow involved 

in the assassination of President Kennedy. 

It is important to understand how 

deep this disposition is in our society. 

In 1956, even before Hofstadter spoke of 

it, Edward A. Shils of the University of 

Chicago—a great, great, social scientist, who has just passed away—published his book, ‘‘The Torment of Secrecy,’’ in which he wrote: 

The exfoliation and intertwinement of the 

various patterns of belief that the world is 

dominated by unseen circles of conspirators, 

operating behind our backs, is one of the 

characteristic features of modern society. 

Such a belief was very much a feature of the Bolshevik regime that took 

shape in Russia in 1917 and 1918. Hence 

the decision to help found and fund in 

the United States a Communist Party, 

part of which would be clandestine. 

The recent discovery in the archives in 

Moscow that John Reed received a payment of 1,008,000 rubles in 1920. As soft 

money, that would be a very considerable sum today. 

It is said that organizations in conflict become like one other. There is a 

degree to which we have emulated the 

Soviet model in our own intelligence 

services. A very powerful essay on this 

matter has just been written by Jefferson Morley in the Washington Post 

under the headline ‘‘Understanding 

Oklahoma’’ in an article entitled ‘‘Department of Secrecy: The Invisible Bureaucracy That Unites Alienated 

America in Suspicion.’’

I would refer also to Douglas Turner 

this weekend in the Buffalo News. I 

spoke of these concerns in an earlier 

statement on the Senate floor entitled 

‘‘The Paranoid Style in American Politics,’’ which I ask unanimous consent 

be printed in the RECORD. 

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without 

objection, it is so ordered. 

(See exhibit 1.) 

Mr. MOYNIHAN. Mr. President, what 

we have today is so much at variance 

with what was thought we would get. 

Allen Dulles was very much part of the 

foundation of postwar intelligence, 

having been in the OSS, serving with 

great distinction in Switzerland during 

World War II. Peter Grose, in his new 

biography, ‘‘Gentleman Spy: The Life 

of Allen Dulles,’’ recounts the testimony Dulles gave before the Senate 

Armed Services Committee on April 25, 

1947, as we were about to enact the National Security Act of 1947 which created a small coordinating body, the 

Central Intelligence Agency. 

Personnel for a central intelligence agency, he argued, ‘‘need not be very numerous 

* * *. The operation of the service must be 

neither flamboyant nor overshrouded with 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS