alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

August 2, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-51461 Summary Calendar

WESLEY N. LAING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Texas

( 03-CV-347 )

Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Wesley Laing filed suit against the United States to

challenge the Government’s filing of a federal tax lien against him

for delinquent trust fund recovery penalty assessments. Laing does

not dispute the validity of the underlying tax liabilities, but

rather argues he never received a first notice of assessment and2

demand for payment within 60 days as prescribed by 26 U.S.C. §

6303(a). This alleged notice failure, according to Laing,

precludes the Government’s ability to exercise its administrative

collection r emedies. The Government filed a motion for summary

judgment, which was granted by the district court.

This Cour t has previously determined that Internal Revenue

Service (“IRS”) Forms 4340 (Certificate of Assessments, Payments,

and Other Specified Matters), copies of which were submitted by the

Government as part of its summary judg ment evidence, are “valid

evidence of a taxpayer’s assessed liabilities and the IRS’s notice

thereof.” P erez v. Unite d States , 312 F.3d 191, 195 (5th Cir.

2002) (citing McCarty v. United States

, 929 F.2d 1085, 1089 (5th

Cir. 1991) (observing that Forms 4340 “indicat[e] that [taxpayer]

had received notice of the assess ment and demand for payment”)).

Moreover, whether Laing received notice is not material to whether

the IRS sent the notices. Jones v. Cmm’r , 338 F.3d 463, 467 (5th

Cir. 2003). As the district court observed, Laing’s evidence that

he did not receive such notice is limited to an affidavit submitted

by his accountant, which the district court disrega rded as being

“based on hearsay and not upon any personal knowledge.” The

distric t court determined that, without more, Laing did not come

forward with any competent summary judgment evidence establishing

that notice of assessment was not properly provided.

Having carefully reviewed the entire record of this case, and

having fully considered the parties’ respective briefing, we find3

no reversible error in the district court’s order. We therefore

AFFIRM the final judgment of the district court for the reasons

stated in its order.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Online Internet Network, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeanette Lucas, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: July 2, 2012








/S/ Jeanette Lucas


Jeanette Lucas


President


(Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Financial Officer)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Juan Negrete

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00357

- CR

Trial court case number: 1524468

Trial court: 263rd District Court of Harris County

App ellant ’ s motion fo r extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief

is now due November 13, 2019. No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

________ _ /s/ Julie Countiss

______________________________ Act ing individually

Date:

_ November 19, 2019

________________
#### Archibald G. Lindsay and Patrick M. Gamble v. Robert Huth et al.

*Mechanics’ lien*— Notice—Verification,

Failure to verify a notice of lien filed under section 8 of Act No. 270, Laws of 1887, is fatal to proceedings thereafter had for its enforcement.

Appeal from Wayne. (Brevoort, J.)

Argued April 12, 1889.

Decided April 24, 1889.

Proceedings under mechanics’ lien law of 1887. Defendants appeal.

Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Charles Flowers,*for appellants Huth and Knickrhem.

*William J. Gray,*for appellant Stanton.

*James H. Pound,*for plaintiffs.

Campbell, J.

Plaintiffs brought proceedings under the statute of 188^ to establish a lien on certain property for the value of lumber claimed to have been sold to *713Nnickrhem and put into a building on tne premises. The case presents a number of serious errors, but, as there is a fatal defect underlying the whole action, we meed refer to no more.

The notice of lien filed with the register has no verification of any kind. The statute positively requires the notice to be verified, amd it cannot be held directory.1 When a person can create a cloud on title by *ex parte*action, he must at least comply with every statutory condition, and the verification was designed to secure good faith in the attempt to set up a lien, and to prevent such notices from being filed without being protected against malicious and uhfounded assertion. Such a lien, when once filed, must have the effect of preventing the property from sale or other use until the validity of it is determined, and it might be made a means of serious mischief, unless carefully guarded. As there was no valid notice of lien filed, there was nothing to authorize this action.

The judgment must be reversed, with costs of both courts, as there is no basis for a new trial

Champlin and Morse, JJ., concurred.

1

 Act No. 270, Laws of 1887, section 3.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Puerto Rico Earthquake Relief, SEAC on Leadership Podcast, Hap Arnold Grant InfoPublished Jan. 24, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Today's look Around the Air Force features relief to Puerto Rico after the recent earthquakes, SEAC Ramón Colón-López, senior enlisted advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on the Leadership Podcast with Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright and Hap Arnold Grant information from the Air Force Aid Society. (Hosted by Senior Airman Angelo Rosario)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
-Puerto Rico National Guard helps respond to earthquakes
- Blueprint Leadership with CMSAF Kaleth Wright: Episode 3 featuring SEAC Ramón Colón-López
- AFAS grant program opens for upcoming academic yearAFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Airmen 



eathquake 



Puerto Rico 



ANG 



National Guard 



PRNG 



New York 



SEAC 



CMSAF 



Colon-Lopez 



“CZ” 



chief 



Wright 



Kaleth 



leadership 



podcast 



Air Force Aid Society 



AFAS 



Hap 



Arnoild 



Grant 



academic 



school 



money 



CZ
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force publishes resources to support Airmen & Space Professionals in courageous conversations

              - Published  July 17, 2020
              -                             By   Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs                                                    

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The Department of the Air Force published its first enterprise-wide Diversity & Inclusion **Resource List** July 17 intended to support commanders and other Air Force leaders in conducting challenging conversations about race, unconscious bias, and systemic prejudices that Airmen and Space Professionals face every day.

“Our Chief of Staff, Gen. Goldfein, shared how two things happened with the brutal killing of George Floyd,” said **Brig. Gen. Troy Dunn**, Air Force director of military force policy and director of the Department of the Air Force’s **Diversity & Inclusion Task Force**. “One, something broke on the streets of America, and America responded as Americans do, which is to gather together and protest a wrong. Two, something broke loose in the Department of the Air Force. This is the opportunity for us to make long-term, meaningful, and lasting change. We start by having courageous conversations.”

To equip leaders in leading those necessary conversations, the Department of the Air Force developed a resource list on race-specific issues, unconscious bias, diversity and inclusion, among others. The list provides impactful information to facilitate listening sessions and build a foundation about diversity in organizations and American society, since both diversity and inclusion are important to mission success. 

 “We must arm our forces with the insights and perspectives of how they can first and foremost be empathetic leaders, and then through the use of that foundational leadership trait, leverage diverse personnel and an inclusive culture to innovate and be ready to combat our adversaries wherever they challenge us,” said Lt. Col. Angel Lugo, education and training chief, of the Air Force Diversity and Inclusion Division. 

The Department leadership and the Task Force received feedback from the field requesting additional resources for follow-on listening and sensing sessions. This resource list is the first of several tools being developed about diversity and inclusion for use by commanders, first sergeants, instructors, recruiters, and other Airmen and Space Professionals.

“This is only one step in what we intend to offer to leaders so they become more comfortable when discussing issues about race, diversity, inclusion, and any other topic that may arise,” Dunn said. “These conversations help to build trust across the force.”

Click **here**to download the resource list. It is also available on the Air Force’s diversity webpage **here**.

AFWNUSAFAFAir Forcediversityinclusionresource listRaceBIASprejudicesmission successone teamlisteningunderstanding
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22165]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 174 / Thursday, September 9, 2010 / 
Notices

[[Page 54846]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Hood/Willamette Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Action of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Hood/Willamette Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet on Thursday, September 30, 2010. The meeting and field trip is 
scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. and will conclude at approximately 3 p.m. 
The meeting will be held at McKenzie River Ranger District Office; 
57600 McKenzie Highway; McKenzie Bridge, Oregon; (541) 822-3381. The 
tentative agenda includes: (1) Public forum; (2) Recommended changes 
for 2011 projects; and (3) Field Trip to review Title II Projects. The 
Public Forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10:05 a.m. Time 
allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3-4 minutes. 
Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material cannot be 
presented within the time limits for the Public Forum. Written comments 
may be submitted prior to the September 30th meeting by sending them to 
Connie Athman at the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Connie Athman; Mt. Hood National Forest; 16400 
Champion Way; Sandy, Oregon 97055; (503) 668-1672.

    Dated: August 31, 2010.
Gary L. Larsen,
Forest Supervisor
[FR Doc. 2010-22165 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. FKA CST
      Entertainment, Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 10QSB for the period ending
      September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and
      Principle Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
      knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





Dated: August
      21, 2008





/S/
                Robert MatthewsName:
                Robert MatthewsTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting
                Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Solido Ventures Inc. 

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Solido Ventures Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Michael Burns, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|  

Solido Ventures Inc. 

Dated: March 31, 2012

By:

  */s/Michael Burns*

 

 

Michael Burns

 

 

President & Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00905-CR

Cesar Daniel RODRIGUEZ-CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 12, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 527406

Honorable Scott Roberts, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial.

SIGNED August 28, 2019.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
EXHIBIT 34.1





ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





To the Board of Directors and Members


Entergy Louisiana, LLC


Jefferson, Louisiana





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1) (ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 29, 2017
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aleris Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Sean M. Stack, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric M. Rychel, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:November 3, 2015/s/ Sean M. StackSean M. StackPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:November 3, 2015/s/ Eric M. RychelEric M. RychelExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### ANCHOR HOCKING CORPORATION v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Learn to Fly: An AFROTC cadet's journey to becoming a pilotPublished Feb. 28, 2020
                        
                        By Robert Dantzler
                        
                        
                        Air University Public Affairs
                
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**Torius Moore, an Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps cadet at Tuskegee University, tells his story of becoming a pilot and the lessons he's learned through AFROTC and how he hopes to use those moving forward.AFWN 



Air Education and Training and Command 



AETC 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



cadet 



Tuskegee University 



pilot 



Maxwell Air Force Base 



Maxwell AFB 



Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps 



AFROTC
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5635]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               VOLUNTEERS HELP KEEP CALIFORNIA BEAUTIFUL

  Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, I rise today in support of thousands of 
California volunteers who have contributed their time and hard work 
this month to ensure California remains the Golden State that its 
people, the rest of the country, and the world have come to treasure.
  April is Keep California Beautiful Month, and the nonprofit Keep 
California Beautiful, Inc., supported by thousands of individuals and 
businesses, as well as county, State and Federal agencies, have 
organized more than a hundred community-based projects to improve and 
maintain our publicly owned lands and facilities, from parks in inner 
cities to the wide-open spaces we all love. The specific objectives are 
to reduce litter, remove graffiti, expand recycling, and enhance 
natural resources in urban and rural areas.
  This year, 1995, is the beginning of what we all hope will be an 
ever-increasing annual event in the years to come. As we tighten our 
belts and streamline government at all levels, volunteer efforts like 
Keep California Beautiful become even more important. In fact, the 
synergy created by the private-public partnership of this effort will, 
I believe, actually multiply our capability to do the hands-on work 
needed in all parts of the State.
  This year's success will be the first of an ongoing annual event for 
years and years to come. That way, not only are we improving California 
for our children, but hopefully our children will improve it for their 
children. It is that kind of spirit that makes California special.
  I commend my fellow Californians for their efforts and encourage 
everyone to get involved in Keep California Beautiful Month next year.

                          ____________________
```