alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Roth to serve as acting Secretary of the Air ForcePublished Jan. 20, 2021
                        
                        By   Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                **John P. Roth** will serve as the Acting Secretary of the Air Force as of Jan. 20, until the president nominates and the Senate confirms a permanent replacement.
Roth succeeds **Barbara Barrett**, who served as the 25th Secretary of the Air Force from Oct. 18, 2019, until Jan. 20.
Roth has served as the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Financial Management and Comptroller since January 2018. From May 2019 to December 2020, he also performed the duties of Under Secretary of the Air Force, a role he held from June to October 2019.
“It is a privilege to serve Airmen and Guardians as the Acting Secretary of the Air Force,” Roth said. “Protecting the nation is a solemn responsibility; one that the U.S. Air and Space Forces execute daily without fail. I look forward to working side-by-side with **Gen. (Charles Q. Brown, Jr.)** and **Gen. (John W.) Raymond** to ensure our Airmen and Guardians have the training and resources required to meet national security requirements and keep America safe.
“I’m eager to continue the momentum Secretary Barrett and these two great military leaders put into motion as we work together to accelerate change for our Air Force and continue building America’s Space Force,” he said.
As acting secretary, Roth leads the Department of the Air Force, comprised of the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force. He is responsible for organizing, training and equipping Air and Space Forces and for the welfare of 697,000 active duty, Guard, Reserve, and civilian Airmen and Guardians and their families.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



John P. Roth 



Roth 



Acting Secretary of the Air Force 



Acting SecAF 



space force 



guardians 



guard 



Reserve 



civilian Airmen 



Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. 



Gen. John W. Raymond
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Jca Z. 2isbrr, 

District &tcIn*y 

hl hl@6tin4, %X46 

.be4il 6UbEittPd $0 U6. 

ttw that the pcpulat it *OUl& 666¶5 to, 

fX&S6iOn4r6' COUXt 

010 oulary In ad&ition to 

In addition to the raer ot 

hs Com~l66~onar6* court 

8 salary ths tea per omt of 

$ 88 this amaunt does not 

anaea under Artiole 

r oent frou. the 

you that the Co~rdsoionera’ Court night 

pay the 4ount 

t446 O? OfflO 

6y OD CS-OitiCiO 6&ihl'y ill M48itiOn t0 th4 

4~ 

sot exaee6 the %axtm.u&. 

a&i aalarp ia aaaltion~to tha f6tr a006 

The county attorney oould ?&em hlra hi8 

OWE 6tUnoqIlrpher,and pay,b4r kiim6eif, but -6 ik not b41iW4 that 

tbors atatutac ref6b4d to iuthorizo the Cozmlcsionar8* Court to 

86t Mid6 ton per oeat of tbe adinpu4nt t&ix46 or say otbar amount 

to ?aao the odary of a 6tsrOtrapber for tba county attornsy. 
Eon. Jos. 2. r'isber, ?a,-t 8 

-e are *able to asa how a oounty 00~16 enter into r 

contract cr agroemsnt to aet 46lda ten per sent of the delinquent 

tax66 to pay the sclary of a etrnographer rcr the oounty attorney 

w:thout oaid agreement being incorporated in, and becoming 4 part 

Of, a au&tract entered into betweea the oouty and scmoone to 

otrlleot dslinquent taxas. is stated in an ophiion, by tbe EGX. 

Giem R**i:tWiS, sddrsoso4 to you CC =une 12, 1939, wblob ~4 quote. 

13 part as ~ollow6: 

"Articla 7XXia, Revlscd Civil Xstutu6, places at)rtaln llnAtatl.:ns upon such po*:car ic contract,. A6 said 

Sy the Coztrds6ion of kppsais in the caac cf asterwo:rd 

vs. f",cnderson County, 62 -. i.. (2d) 66, *The power to 

provic;e for tba coll4otlor of delinquent tare6 and preecrlba the ocxpancatloc to be pald for servlasa rend4r6d 

In tLat respect resides erolusivcly in the Legislature 

exoept as given by statute a 'acmdssioner61 oourt 

ia'&eriens to contract in tho respsats mxitionsd.~w 

It 13, tb.eretore, cur oplnlon thet the Coxz5sslonorsq 

Court ;rf jasper County doe6 not have tts autborlty to set saida 354~ 

per cent of the d4linCuont tax46 belonging to the oountp to pay 

the salary oi a etenographer for the oounty attorney to 6s6i6t 

In the tiling of dellngtent tax 8tit6. 

~;e trust that this anrmora your inquiry, vi6 ac4 

Very truly your6 

grTDIzL:::.Y GF.rfRAL 03 TSXAE i, 

By 3&Ccib@ * 

4issiatent 

FCC : s 

COMMOTEE
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Date:  March 29, 2017





Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer





By:  /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4800]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         KEEP PRESSURE ON JAPAN

  (Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, recently the United States 
and Japan resumed automobile trade talks and these talks have 
collapsed. The talks were aimed at opening the Japanese market to autos 
and auto parts.
  The United States presented new proposals in the two priority areas--
improved foreign access to Japan's auto markets and increase sales of 
auto parts in both the United States and Japan. Japan's auto market 
remains closed. It has been stated Japan sells as many cars in a week 
in the United States as United States automakers sell a whole year in 
Japan.
  Japan continues to maintain a closed economy which discriminates 
against United States auto exports and effects international economics. 
Japanese officials have expressed dismay over what they termed new 
demands at a late stage of talks.
  Currently, there is a $36.7 billion United States-Japan gap in trade 
in autos and auto parts. This gap has to be decreased. Japan's market 
share of auto imports is only 4 percent. In addition, Japan's market 
share of auto imports is only 2.4 percent.
  Nearly 2 years of negotiations have failed to produce an agreement in 
the United States-Japan auto trade talks. The administration announced 
tough trade sanctions against Japan. These sanctions will probably 
entail higher tariffs on Japanese imports worth billions of dollars a 
year.
  I urge USTR and the administration to remain tough on Japan. The 
United States-Japan gap in trade is not reflective of the 
competitiveness of United States autos and auto parts. The United 
States is manufacturing auto and auto parts that are capable of 
competing in the Japanese market. The quality of United States products 
would gradually bring about a reduction of the deficit, if Japan would 
only begin to open their market.
  We need to send Japan a clear message that we will not back down on 
the opening of their markets to auto and auto parts. If they refuse to 
negotiate, we should promptly enact tough sanctions.

                          ____________________
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2981 

To prohibit Federal agencies from mandating the deployment of vulnerabilities 

in data security technologies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2014 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal agencies from mandating the deployment 

of vulnerabilities in data security technologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Data Act of 

5 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DATA SECURITY VULNERABILITY 

7 MANDATES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

9 (b), no agency may mandate that a manufacturer, devel10 oper, or seller of covered products design or alter the secuVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:59 Dec 06, 2014 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 \\ALPHA3\E\BILLS\S2981.IS S2981

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2981 IS

1 rity functions in its product or service to allow the surveil2 lance of any user of such product or service, or to allow 

3 the physical search of such product, by any agency. 

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

5 mandates authorized under the Communications Assist6 ance for Law Enforcement Act (47 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). 

7 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

8 (1) the term ‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given 

9 the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States 

10 Code; and 

11 (2) the term ‘‘covered product’’ means any com12 puter hardware, computer software, or electronic de13 vice that is made available to the general public. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Air and Space Force’s acquisition chief appoints Rapid Capabilities Office as integrating PEO for ABMS, expanding from startup toward rapidly scaling delivery phasesPublished Nov. 24, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                **Dr. Will Roper**, Air Force and **Space Force** acquisition chief, signed a memorandum directive Nov. 24 assigning the Advanced Battle Management System delivery phases to the Department of the **Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office** as the integrating Program Executive Office.
Internet of military things, or “IoT.mil,” demonstrations, called Onramps, will remain under the chief architect, Preston Dunlap.
This move will place one of the Department of the Air Force’s top modernization priorities under an office with demonstrated ability to mature, integrate and field complex capabilities rapidly, such as the **X-37B spaceplane**, B-21 bomber and classified systems. The RCO will add its execution expertise to the chief architect’s accomplishments in rapid development and demonstration.
“We have worked earnestly for a year and half to demonstrate data-centric, internet-enabled warfighting constructs. I have witnessed the birth of ‘IoT.mil’ capabilities in ABMS demonstrations,” Roper said. “We are no longer asking if we can build an ‘IoT.mil.’ We have graduated to how and when, to warfighters ready to field and train. Consequently, ABMS is graduating to its next phase with demonstrations run by our chief architect and fielding by our integrating PEO.”
The reorganization takes place immediately. The RCO will be responsible for the ABMS acquisition strategy and integrating all ABMS capabilities for delivery to operational users.
“It’s time to move from start-up to scale-up on ABMS. Given the rapid nature of development and the span across the Air Force and Space Force, the RCO is the right place to integrate the development of ABMS products at scale,” Dunlap said. “This is a necessary move to allow one high-performance team to focus on setting the architecture while another focuses on execution and fielding.”
The RCO has routinely been the department’s “go-to” for top-priority acquisitions; it is designed to expedite development and fielding of capabilities and leverages defense-wide technology development and existing operational capabilities to support immediate and near-term warfighter needs.
“ABMS is a challenge unlike any other in the Department of Defense. Both cross-cutting and continually-adapting capabilities challenge the stove-piped acquisition system: an ‘IoT.mil’ must be both,” Roper said. “Working with our chief architect, I am confident the RCO will take our present software momentum to the next level.”USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



ABMS 



Advanced Battle Management System 



Dr. Will Roper 



acquisition 



Rapid Capabilities Office 



Iot.mil 



internet of military things 



Onramps 



Program Executive Office 



PEO 



AFWN
News United States Air Force
 Air Force provides WAPS testing guidancePublished March 23, 2020
                        
                        By Air Force's Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials announced that the Weighted Airman Promotion System testing is postponed through May 11 to help reduce the spread of COVID-19.
Installation commanders have the authority to determine testing center availability to maintain health and safety. As a result of some centers not being available for testing due to the COVID-19 outbreak, current WAPS testing is postponed through May 11.
Airmen can voluntarily elect to test before May 11 pending testing center availability. Additionally, Airmen who have already tested will not retest.
Any Airman who is unable to test within the extended testing cycle window will be automatically considered for in-system supplemental promotion once they are able to test.
Air Force officials will continue assessing the situation and make adjustments as necessary.
Airmen should contact their testing control office and chain of command for additional information.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



AETC 



Air Education and Training Command 



COVID-19 



coronavirus 



WAPS Testing 



guidance 



Weighted Airman Promotion System 



testing 



promotion 



postponement
[No. 23940-0-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ernest Alvin Carter, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 97-1-04547-1, Thomas Felnagle, J., entered September 23, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, A.C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Houghton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<CIK>                                            0000771296
<NAME>                                         INTERSTATE-JOHNSON LANE
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,672
<RECEIVABLES>                                  315,334
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             41,625
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           19,761
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            115,656
<PP&E>                                          11,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 642,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                    21,066
<PAYABLES>                                     353,615
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    74,177
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                               0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              33,576
<LONG-TERM>                                     24,054
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,433
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   642,663
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                1,670
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             9,132
<COMMISSIONS>                                   45,785
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    2,237
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    4,358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,319
<COMPENSATION>                                  40,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,678
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,678
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .44
        




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D604-D605]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
APPROPRIATIONS--LOC/CBO/CAPITOL POLICE
Committee on Appropriations: Subcommittee on Legislative Branch held 
hearings on proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 1996, receiving 
testimony in behalf of funds for their respective activities from James 
H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; June E. O'Neill, Director, and 
James L. Blum, Deputy Director, both of the Congressional Budget 
Office; and Gary L. Abrecht, Chief, United States Capitol Police.
  Subcommittee will meet again on Monday, May 22.
AUTHORIZATIONS--DEFENSE
Committee on Armed Services: Subcommittee on Readiness and Subcommittee 
on Personnel concluded joint hearings on S. 727, authorizing funds for 
fiscal year 1996 for military activities of the Department of Defense 
and the future years defense program, focusing on military family 
housing issues, after receiving testimony from Joshua Gotbaum, 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Economic Security; Paul Johnson, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations and Housing; 
Robert B. Pirie, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations 
and Environment; and Rodney A. Coleman, Assistant Secretary 
[[Page D605]] of the Air Force for Manpower, Reserve Affairs, 
Installation and Environment.
CARIBBEAN BASIN INITIATIVE
Committee on Finance: Subcommittee on International Trade held hearings 
on S. 529, to provide, temporarily, tariff and quota treatment 
equivalent to that accorded to members of the North American Free Trade 
Agreement (NAFTA) to Caribbean Basin beneficiary countries, receiving 
testimony from Charlene Barshefsky, Deputy United States Trade 
Representative; Alexander F. Watson, Assistant Secretary of State for 
Inter-American Affairs; Noel Beasley, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile 
Workers Union, Chicago, Illinois; Fred O. Braswell, III, Russell 
Corporation, Alexander City, Alabama, on behalf of the American Textile 
Manufacturers Institute; Jeffrey J. Schott, Institute for International 
Economics, Washington, D.C.; and William Woltz, Jr., Perry 
Manufacturing Company, Mt. Airy, North Carolina, on behalf of the 
American Apparel Manufacturers Association.
  Hearings were recessed subject to call.
CONGRESSIONAL PENSION REFORM
Committee on Governmental Affairs: Subcommittee on Post Office and 
Civil Service held hearings on S. 228, to amend certain provisions of 
title 5, United States Code, relating to the treatment of Members of 
Congress and Congressional employees for retirement purposes, focusing 
on a comparison of congressional and Federal retirement benefit 
programs, receiving testimony from Senator Bryan; Representative Moran; 
William E. Flynn, III, Associate Director, Retirement and Insurance 
Service, Office of Personnel Management; and Johnny C. Finch, Assistant 
Comptroller General for General Government Division, General Accounting 
Office.
  Subcommittee will meet again on Monday, May 22.
```
[Nos. 44182-5-I; 44115-9-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry W. Johnson, *Petitioner.*The State of Washington, *Petitioner,*v. Mary A. Laurent, *Respondent.*

The opinion in the above captioned case, which appeared in the advance sheets at 100 Wn. App. 917-25, has been omitted from this permanent bound volume pursuant to an order of the Court of Appeals dated January 29, 2001 directing that the opinion not be published.
[No. 23320-7-II.

Division Two.

March 31, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Wilburen Carl Boggs, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 98-1-00203-1, Stephen M. Warning, J., entered May 15, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Armstrong, A.C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
[No. 23681-8-II.

Division Two.

March 24, 2000.]

#### Jeffrey Call, *Respondent,*v. Milgard Manufacturing, Inc., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-2-09237-7, Nile E. Aubrey, J., entered August 7, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton and Hunt, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4676]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                PASS BOTH A BUDGET BILL AND A FARM BILL

  (Mrs. CLAYTON asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Mrs. CLAYTON. Mr. Speaker, we are now in the process of shaping a 
budget for America for the next fiscal year. Soon, we will consider 
reauthorization of a farm bill for the next several years. It is my 
hope that we will pass a budget bill and pass a farm bill. The two 
bills should not be mixed.
  None will dispute that cuts in the budget are inevitable; all will 
agree that farm programs should bear a share of the cuts. But, $15 
billion in reductions is not a cut, Mr. Speaker, it is a severance. $15 
billion in reductions will gut the farm programs, will disrupt vital 
revenue sources in rural communities, and will affect the economy in 
severe and unintended ways. This issue transcends party and region. It 
is a direct hit on rural America, and it also strikes a blow against 
urban America.
  Let us pass a budget bill. Then, let us pass a farm bill, but, in our 
effort to stabilize the budget, we must be careful not to destabilize 
food production for working families who are America's consumers.

                          ____________________
```