alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 March ARB named preferred location for next KC-46A PegasusPublished Jan. 24, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected**March Air Reserve Base**, California, as the preferred location to host the next **KC-46A Pegasus** aircraft.

The decision was made after conducting site surveys that assessed locations based on factors related to mission, infrastructure capacity, community support, environmental considerations and cost.

Twelve KC-46As will replace**KC-135 Stratotankers** at March ARB.

The new tankers will bring many enhanced capabilities, such as boom and drogue refueling on the same sortie, worldwide navigations and communication, cargo capacity on the entire main deck floor, receiver air refueling, improved force protection, and multi-point air refueling capability.

A final basing decision will be made after an environmental impact analysis, which is expected to take place in fall 2023.**Grissom ARB**, Indiana, and **Tinker Air Force Base**, Oklahoma, are considered reasonable alternatives and will also undergo environmental impact analyses.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



March ARB 



Air Force Reserve Command 



KC-46A 



Pegasus 



KC-135 



Stratotanker 



Grissom ARB 



Tinker AFB
News United States Air Force
 US, Italian air forces, NATO work together for exercise Spartan Alliance 18-8Published July 20, 2018
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Rachel Waller
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces in Europe Public Affairs
                **EINSIEDLERHOF, Germany (AFNS) --**
                More than 80 service members, civilians and contractors from U.S. Air Forces in Europe, the Italian air force and NATO participated in exercise Spartan Alliance 18-8, July 17 – 20, 2018, from three locations in Germany and Italy.
 
Spartan Alliance 18-8 is a large command and control weapon system, air and ground simulator training exercise with virtual and constructive aircraft.
 
“[The crews] complete the mission together, but networked from their own bases,” said Lt. Col. Steven Storch,  Warrior Preparation Center special projects officer. “This is important because it offers a much lower cost method of training together, ensuring we can communicate effectively, and successfully, to complete the mission together. In an alliance that speaks many different languages, this is important.”  
 
Since its inception in 2015, Spartan Alliance has continued to grow. This iteration is the first time the IAF has participated in this type of exercise outside of their country.
 
Italy started working in the field of simulations and simulators last year, said Lt. Gen. Settimo Caputo, IAF deputy chief of staff. He stated using the simulators is beneficial to the IAF because they are able to create complex scenarios that aircrews wouldn’t have been able to practice in the past.
 
“This is a very great opportunity to start seeing what we can do in this field," said Caputo. “We are participating with many simulators because we believe in this area and we are planning for the future and next year, we can provide more effort to this field, so thank you for this great opportunity for the Italian air force.”
 
Spartan Alliance will continue with two more iterations this year.AFAFRICA 



Germany 



exercise 



training 



simulator 



NATO 



Command 



Control 



Italy 



air 



ground 



Italian air force 



Spartan Alliance 



weapon system 



USAFE
News United States Air Force
 AF releases 2018 squadron command slection listPublished Dec. 21, 2017
                        
                        By  Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                More than 550 officers from more than 20 career fields, including support, medical, test and others, have been matched to squadron commander positions across the Air Force.
Using the previously published squadron commander candidate lists, wing and group hiring officials selected individuals to fill projected squadron commander vacancies for 2018, including other non-core commands such as training, recruiting, air base squadrons and 365-day extended deployment command opportunities.
Typically, there are more qualified officers on the candidate lists than there are command vacancies to account for any unexpected contingencies during the year. Candidates who were not selected will remain eligible for command vacancies that open during the calendar year.
The selection list is posted on myPers, accessible from a CAC-enabled computer. To view the list, select “Active Duty Officer” from the dropdown menu and search “Consolidated Squadron.” Prior to posting the list on myPers, the Air Force’s Personnel Center provided senior raters with seven days’ advanced knowledge of their officers’ selection to allow notification through the chain of command.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Eligible individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.force management 



AFPC 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



squadron 



squadron command 



command selection 



developing leaders 



JB San Antonio
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00268-CV

In the Interest of J.M.G., J.G. III, and J.X.G., children

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 07-06635-00-0-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant and it is ordered to pay all costs of the appeal from which it is not exempt by 

statute.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 7, 2021
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2004
(the "Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  May 12, 2004                  By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Foreland Corporation, (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce C. Decker,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Bruce C. Decker
------------------------
Bruce C. Decker
Chief Financial Officer
August 23, 2002
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# CMSAF visits heritage museum to see new AFJROTC enlisted legacy display

              - Published  May 27, 2021
              -                             By Christian P. Hodge                                                    
              - Headquarters Air Force Junior ROTC Public Affairs

**MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --  **
**Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass** visited the Air Force Enlisted Heritage Research Institute at the Maxwell-Gunter Annex to view the new Air Force Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps enlisted legacy display, May 12.The display honors the dedication AFJROTC enlisted aerospace science instructors have to the program and the Air Force by continuing to serve the nation past their 20 years on active duty. It also highlights the impact the program can have on a young high school student who decides to enlist after being in AFJROTC.“Our heritage matters,” Bass said. “The EHRI is more than just a collection of artifacts and items from our Air Force history, it is a place where the lessons of the past can help shape the decisions of the future. All of our Airmen can benefit from learning about the journey that helped build our great Air Force.”The mission of AFJROTC is to develop “citizens of character dedicated to serving their nation and community,” and its goals are to instill values of citizenship, service to the United States, personal responsibility and a sense of accomplishment.The staff includes approximately 1,900 retired officers and enlisted Air Force instructors.“Today, we have approximately 1,000 enlisted instructors in AFJROTC,” said Dave Richerson, Headquarters AFJROTC chief of instructor management. “This (EHRI display) highlights an often-unknown part of our enlisted heritage. It recognizes the thousands of enlisted Airmen who, since 1966, continued to wear their uniform after retirement, developing citizens of character for America.”The Enlisted Heritage Research Institute is an enlisted-centric museum. The AFJROTC display consists of current and historical photos, a guidon, antique textbook, unit patches and an accompanying video.A Headquarters AFJROTC staff sergeant spearheaded the whole endeavor.“I think that this project is important to AFJROTC’s legacy because it helps preserve the program’s history,” said Staff Sgt. Tikeya Strong, credit card and logistics technician. “It lets future generations see where the program began and where it is today. I hope that this project will help highlight AFJROTC, its enlisted instructors and all of the people like me who work behind the scenes.”The retired enlisted instructors teach and inspire approximately 110,000 cadets in high schools at almost 900 AFJROTC units across the U.S. and select Department of Defense Education Activity schools in Europe, the Pacific and Puerto Rico.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAETCAir Education and Training CommandMaxwell AFBCMSAFChief Master Sgt. of the Air ForceJoAnne S Bass
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22824]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

22nd Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: 
AIS and MET Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: 
AIS and MET Data Link Services meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: AIS and 
MET Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 5-7, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Eurocontrol, Jupiter Conference 
Room, Brussels, Belgium. Contact Person: Gerard Terrien, Eurocontrol, 
Phone: 32-2-729-3581.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 
Plenary: AIS and MET Data Link Services meeting. The agenda will 
include:

5 October--Tuesday

     9 a.m.--Opening Plenary.
     Chairmen's remarks and Host's comments.
     Introductions, approval of previous meeting minutes, 
review and approve meeting agenda.
     Schedule for this week.
     Action Item Review.
     10 a.m. SPR FRAC Comment Review--Joint AIS and MET 
Subgroup Meetings.

6 October--Wednesday

     9 a.m. SPR FRAC Comment Review--Joint AIS and MET Subgroup 
Meetings.

7 October--Thursday

     9 a.m. SPR FRAC Comment Review--Joint AIS and MET Subgroup 
Meetings.
     10:30 a.m. Plenary Session.
     Approve New Document--SPR for AIS and MET Data Link 
Services.
     Other Business.
     Meeting Plans and Dates.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 7, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-22824 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### Better Taste Popcorn Co., Inc. *v.*Jack et al.

[No. 18,575.

Filed March 25, 1955.

Rehearing denied June 16, 1955.

Transfer denied November 15, 1955.]

*2*Hollowell & Hamill, Robert Hollowell*(of counsel), of Indianapolis, and *O’Neill, Scott & Schrenker,*of Anderson, for appellant.

*Robert L. Shearer,*of Anderson, and *Melville E. Watson,*of Greenfield, for appellees.

Royse, P. J.

This is the fourth appeal by appellant to this court from a judgment against it for the value of popcorn sold to it pursuant to the terms of a series of contracts made in 1948. *Better Taste Popcorn Company, Inc.*v. *Drake et al.*(1952), 122 Ind. App. 696, 107 N. E. 2d 801; *Better Taste Popcorn Co., Inc.*v. *Peters*(1953), 124 Ind. App. 319, 114 N. E. 2d 817 (Transfer denied) ; *Better Taste Popcorn Company, Inc.*v. *Clifford Drake*(1955), 125 Ind. App. 522, 124 N. E. 2d 709.

In this case the pleadings, the evidence, parol and documentary, and the contentions of the parties, with the exceptions hereinafter noted, were substantially the same as in the above cited cases.

Appellant contends the verdict of the j ury on its cross-complaint is contrary to law because the jury, by its answers to interrogatories 13, 14, 15 and 16 found that a contract was entered into by appellee authorizing appellant to process said corn and sell the same when the pyice would net $5.00 per cwt. over the expense of storage, etc.

In the Peters case, *supra,*we held that a contract identical to that referred to herein was not supported by any valid consideration and “must be regarded as *nudum pactum*and therefore constitutes no defense”. Under these circumstances it is not necessary to consider the propriety of submitting such interrogatories to the jury.

*3In our opinion it would serve no good purpose to' restate the reasons which guided our' decision in the Peters and Clifford Drake cases, *supra.*Therefore, on the authority of the last mentioned cases the judgment is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 125 N. E. 2d 256.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

February 28, 2014 Via EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Permian Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL   J. ULRICH                                                                                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Michael   J. Ulrich                                                                                         |
|   |   | *Vice President*   The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,   N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Permian Trust |

 

----
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 20-5019 September Term, 2020 1: 19-c v -017 88-UNA Filed O n: Octob er 5, 20 20 Benjam in Cun ningham ,

App ellant
v . Adm inistrative Of

f ice of the United Sta tes Courts, et a l., App ellees

ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Hend erson an d T ate l, Circuit Jud ges, an d S ent elle, S enio r Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the am end ed brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. App . P. 34 (a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 3 4(j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder f iled Ja nua ry 2, 202 0, be af f irmed . T he not ice of

ap pea l is time ly

on ly as t o th e o rder de nying recon siderat ion. See Fed . R. A pp. P. 4(a)(1)(B), (a)(4)(a). App ellantha s no t sho w n th at t he district cou rt abu sed its discretio n in den y ing his m otion for recon siderat ion o f the orde r dismissing the case as d uplicat ive o f an am end ed com plaintf iled b y ap pellan t in a sep arate lawsuit. See Owens v. Repub lic of Su dan , 86 4 F.3 d 7 51, 81 8 (D.C. Cir. 20 17); see also Zerilli v . Evening News Ass’n, 62 8 F.2 d 2 17, 22 2 (D.C. Cir. 19 80) (“[A] plaint if f ha s no rig ht t o m ainta in two sepa rate action s involv ing the sam e su bject ma tter a t th e sa me time in th e sa me cou rt an d a gainst th e sa me de fend ant .”) (citation and inte rnal quotat ion m arks om itted ).

# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 20-5019 September Term, 2020
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEKTOR AYALA
, Appellant,

v.

JARISEL VEGA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1779

[ July 12, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Mariya Weekes , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE14

- 000918

.

Susan R. Brown of Susan R. Brown, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

G ERBER
, J

.

T he father appeals from the circuit court ’ s final judgment on the

f ather ’ s petition to relocate from Broward County to Palm Coast . The final judgment ratified a magistrate ’ s report which had recommended granting

the father ’ s relocation petition, but chang ing the parties ’ previous ly agreed

- upon 50/50 timesharing arrangement to the mother having majority timesharing in Broward County

.

The father primarily argues the circuit court abused its discretion in modifying the parties’ previously agreed

- upon 50/50 timesharing, because

the mother never filed a p leading seeking modification

, and the father did not try the modification issue by consent , thus violating his due process rights

. See Romero v. Brabham , 300 So. 3d 665, 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“Granting unrequested relief absent proper notice is a viola tion of due process.” ) (citations omitted); Bailey v. Bailey , 227 So. 3d 768, 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“[W] e agree with the former wife that the trial court erred in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation

for timesharin g because that issue was not pled or tried by consent

. ”).

We dis agree with the father ’ s argument . The record indicates the mother’s answer requested that she be given majority timesharing.2 Further, d uring the trial, the mother, like the father

, requested majority timesharing. At no point during or after the trial did the father object on the ground that the mother had not filed a pleading requesting that she be given majority timesharing

. So even if the mother’s answer had not requested that she be given majority timesharing, the father tried that issue by consent.

The father’s remaining arguments lack merit and do not require further

discussion

. Thus, we affirm the circuit court’s final ju dgment. However,

our affirmance is without prejudice to the father filing a nother petition seeking to relocate back to Broward County and resume the parties’ previously agreed

- upon 50/50 timesharing arrangement , as the father had alternatively suggested d uring the final hearing

. We take no position on the merits of such a petition.

Affirmed

.

C IKLIN and K UNTZ
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.