alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 USAF Stratotankers provide air refueling capabilities for exercise Cold Response 20Published March 11, 2020
                        
                        By U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Europe and Africa
                **ØRLAND AIR STATION, NORWAY --**
                The air refueling capabilities for exercise Cold Response 20 are fully operational at Ørland Air Station, Norway, with the arrival of KC-135R Stratotankers assigned to Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom, and Tinker AFB, Oklahoma.Cold Response is a Norwegian national readiness and defense exercise, with participation from each of Norway’s military services, as well as eight additional NATO allied nations and regional partners. The U.S. Air Force’s KC-135R Stratotankers extend missions by providing aerial refueling for U.S., ally and partner aircraft.Maj. Jared Alden, chief of plans and programs for the 100th Operations Group at RAF Mildenhall, is the acting air-to-air refueling detachment commander for Cold Response 20. He said his excitement grew steadily through his involvement in planning the exercise.“It’s a great opportunity to work with the Norwegians and a few of our other NATO allies and partners, and an opportunity to test our capabilities up this far north in a European country without the home station support we’re used to,” Alden said. “The integration between the Air National Guard, Air Force Reserve Command and active duty forces is going to be second to none.”The majority of the aircraft maintenance team assigned to the exercise is being provided by the 168th Wing of the Alaska Air National Guard, with Chief Master Sgt. Philip Newton, 168th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron superintendent, acting as the production superintendent.Working with 30% less manning than what is normal for a mission, the support from the Norwegian Armed Forces has been phenomenal, Newton said. He added the 16th Wing gaining valuable experience deploying their jets to an air base with limited support capability, standing up a mission there, and operating out of it.“It’s just cool to come here, work with our NATO ally, and generate missions at a Forward Operating Base with minimum support,” Newton said. “The idea wasn’t for us to gain experience on cold weather operations, but to teach other ... By coming here, with (Tinker AFB) and (RAF) Mildenhall integrating with us, it’s an opportunity to show them how this is done in an exercise environment.”Alden praised the 168th Wing’s maintenance package because it brings invaluable teamwork and knowledge to the table.“These guys bringing in their maintenance team, with their experience and ease of operating in the cold and snowy conditions is absolutely a huge value,” Alden said.The Cold Response 20 air refueling mission is expected to offload 12 million pounds of fuel to U.S. Air Force, NATO ally and regional partner aircraft.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe & Air Forces Africa 



USAFE 



USAFE-AFAFRICA 



KC-135R 



Stratotanker 



Cold Response 



Norway 



NATO
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6358]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   SENATE RESOLUTION 119--AUTHORIZING REPRESENTATION BY LEGAL COUNSEL

  Mr. GORTON (for Mr. Dole, for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the 
following resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

                              S. Res. 119

       Whereas, in the case of United States v. George C. 
     Matthews, Case No. 95-CR-11, pending in the United States 
     District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, a 
     subpoena for testimony has been issued to Darin Schroeder, an 
     employee of the Senate on the staff of Senator Feingold;
       Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United 
     States and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no 
     evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate 
     may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or 
     possession but by permission of the Senate;
       Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 
     in the possession of the Senate may promote the 
     administration of justice, the Senate will take such action 
     as will promote the ends of justice consistently with the 
     privileges of the Senate;
       Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 
     Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) 
     and 288c(a)(2) (1994), the Senate may direct its counsel to 
     represent committees, Members, officers and employees of the 
     Senate with respect to subpoenas or orders issued to them in 
     their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved, That Darin Schroeder and any other employees in 
     Senator Feingold's office from whom testimony may be 
     necessary are authorized to testify and to produce records in 
     the case of United States v. George C. Matthews, except 
     concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
       Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to 
     represent Darin Schroeder and any other employee in 
     connection with the testimony authorized under section 1.
     

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Cambridge Advantaged Properties II Limited Partnership and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-25-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-2000
<CASH>                                       1,766,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,528,181
<PP&E>                                      87,840,228
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,813,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,652,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,780,423
<BONDS>                                     66,052,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (23,180,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,652,346
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,223,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,173,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,770,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,279,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,271,057
<EPS-BASIC>                                        314
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[No. 17320-8-III.

Division Three.

May 30, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Detention of*Abraham W. Dean, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 96-2-02973-3, Michael W. Leavitt, J., entered March 3, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kato, JJ.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2822 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct 

a study on matters relating to the burial of unclaimed 

remains of veterans in national cemeteries, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2822 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dignified Interment 

3 of Our Veterans Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS STUDY ON 

5 MATTERS RELATING TO BURIAL OF UN6 CLAIMED REMAINS OF VETERANS IN NA7 TIONAL CEMETERIES. 

8 (a) STUDY AND REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 

9 one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

10 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— 

11 (1) complete a study on matters relating to the 

12 interring of unclaimed remains of veterans in na13 tional cemeteries under the control of the National 

14 Cemetery Administration; and 

15 (2) submit to Congress a report on the findings 

16 of the Secretary with respect to the study required 

17 under paragraph (1). 

18 (b) MATTERS STUDIED.—The matters studied under 

19 subsection (a)(1) shall include the following: 

20 (1) Determining the scope of issues relating to 

21 unclaimed remains of veterans, including an esti22 mate of the number of unclaimed remains of vet23 erans. 

24 (2) Assessing the effectiveness of the proce25 dures of the Department of Veterans Affairs for 

26 working with persons or entities having custody of 
3 

†S 2822 ES

1 unclaimed remains to facilitate interment of un2 claimed remains of veterans in national cemeteries 

3 under the control of the National Cemetery Adminis4 tration. 

5 (3) Assessing State and local laws that affect 

6 the ability of the Secretary to inter unclaimed re7 mains of veterans in national cemeteries under the 

8 control of the National Cemetery Administration. 

9 (4) Developing recommendations for such legis10 lative or administrative action as the Secretary con11 siders appropriate. 

12 (c) METHODOLOGY.— 

13 (1) NUMBER OF UNCLAIMED REMAINS.—In es14 timating the number of unclaimed remains of vet15 erans under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary may re16 view such subset of applicable entities as the Sec17 retary considers appropriate, including a subset of 

18 funeral homes and coroner offices that possess un19 claimed veterans remains. 

20 (2) ASSESSMENT OF STATE AND LOCAL

21 LAWS.—In assessing State and local laws under sub22 section (b)(3), the Secretary may assess such sample 

23 of applicable State and local laws as the Secretary 
4 

†S 2822 ES

1 considers appropriate in lieu of reviewing all applica2 ble State and local laws. 

Passed the Senate December 10, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2822 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conteries, and for other purposes. unclaimed remains of veterans in national ceme- duct a study on matters relating to the burial of
[No. 43264-8-I.

Division One.

April 3, 2000.]

#### Cimarron Enterprises, Inc., et al., *Appellants,*v. Mortgage Exchange Investments, Inc., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 95-2-01056-6, Susan K. Cook, J., entered July 31, 1998. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 Respite Care available for EFMP familiesPublished Feb. 21, 2022
                        
                        By Lauren Russell
                        
                        
                        66th Air Base Group Public Affairs
                **HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --**
                Families enrolled in the **Exceptional Family Member Program** are eligible for additional support through the **Air Force Respite Care** program.
The program provides active duty Air Force families with short-term, specialized childcare to reduce the stressors associated with caring for a child with exceptional needs. It is exclusively connected to EFMP families coded for moderate and severe needs.
“For anyone in the position of being a caregiver, being able to step away to run errands, go to the gym, or just take a break is a huge help and benefit for their family,” said Robin Morris, 66th Force Support Squadron community childcare coordinator.
Morris emphasized that the Respite Care program is not a replacement for everyday childcare. The program allows up to 40 hours of care per month for both EFMP children and their siblings up to 13 years old at no cost to families.
“It can be so difficult to find, retain and afford reliable care for your children, especially when there are special needs and you’re working around deployments and permanent change of station moves,” said Kristy Anderson, an EFMP family member with two children. “The respite program does a lot of good for so many military families.”
While the Air Force runs the Respite Care program, providers are not Department of Defense employees, rather, independent caregivers.
“This program gives providers the option to work around other jobs, as long as the schedules don’t overlap,” Morris said. “You could be a DoD employee and offer this care to families on nights and weekends. There’s so much flexibility, and it can be so rewarding.”
Providers must be 18 or older and certified in first aid and CPR, as well as trained in special needs inclusion and child abuse prevention. Additional training may be required based on the exceptional needs of the family, including physical, mental, developmental or sensory needs.
Additional information on EFMP Respite Care can be found **here**.L/R 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



EFMP 



Exceptional Family Member Program 



AFMC 



Air Force Materiel Command 



Respite Care 



families 



Hanscom AFB 



childcare
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 8, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 00014

- CV

James E. WALLACE Sr.

, Appellant

v.

Letitia Ann WALLACE

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 10056 Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant James E. Wallace Sr.

It is so ORDERED on May 8, 2013

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of May, 2013

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
[No. 43031-9-I.

Division One.

April 17, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Detention of*Randy Pedersen, *Appellant,*and The State of Washington, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-2-09933-9, Sharon S. Armstrong, J., entered March 7, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, J., concurred in by Baker and Cox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1997
<CASH>                                          43,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,386,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                    77,733
<INVENTORY>                                  8,748,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,082,712
<PP&E>                                      13,252,818
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,790,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,936,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,137,416
<BONDS>                                      4,504,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,447
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,752,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,936,816
<SALES>                                      9,554,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,554,326
<CGS>                                        8,449,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,112,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             205,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                255,961
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            255,961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   255,961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FS Investment Corporation II (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), Michael C. Forman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Lawson, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 18, 2015



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL C. FORMAN
|Michael C. Forman       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|                        
|/s/    MICHAEL LAWSON   
|Michael Lawson          
|Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22388]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-106)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: September 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James J. McGroary, Patent Counsel, 
Marshall Space Flight Center, Mail Code LS01, Huntsville, AL 35812; 
telephone (256) 544-0013; fax (256) 544-0258.

NASA Case No. MFS-32715-1: Method of Promoting Single Crystal Growth 
During Melt Growth of Semiconductors;
NASA Case No. MFS-32642-1: Liquid Level Sensing System;
NASA Case No. MFS-32638-1: Force Sensor Using Changes in Magnetic Flux;
NASA Case No. MFS-32614-1: Magnetostrictive Pressure Regulating System.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22388 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
    NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
   OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
   The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period April 25, 2011 through March 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as Seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-A Owner Trust, as Issuer, to be conducted under his supervision; and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2012.
   /s/ Mark Kaczynski
 Mark Kaczynski
 President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 449 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 449

    For the relief of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and 
                            Kristjan Dodaj.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2013

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    For the relief of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and 
                            Kristjan Dodaj.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, and Kristjan Dodaj 
shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the 
United States, and shall be eligible for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence under section 245 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing an 
application for such adjustment of status.
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the application for adjustment of status is filed with 
appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
permanent resident status to Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, 
and Kristjan Dodaj the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal 
year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to 
natives of the country of the birth of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, 
Franc Dodaj, and Kristjan Dodaj under section 202(a)(2) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)).
                                 <all>
```