alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CP KELCO US, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, 

JUNGBUNZLAUER AUSTRIA AG,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2015-1209

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of International 

Trade in No. 1:13-cv-00287-RWG, Senior Judge Richard 

W. Goldberg.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

NANCY NOONAN, Arent Fox, LLP, Washington DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KEITH F.

HUFFMAN, MATTHEW L. KANNA, TINA TERMEI.

DAVID ANDREW JACK GOLDFINE, Office of the General 

Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United 

States. Also represented by ANDREA C. CASSON, DOMINIC 

L. BIANCH.
 

FREDERICK PAUL WAITE, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & 

Pease LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee Jungbunzlauer Austria AG. Also represented by 

KIMBERLY YOUNG, WILLIAM MICHAEL RYAN BARRETT.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, TARANTO, Circuit Judges, and 

STARK, District Judge.*).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court 

* The Honorable Leonard P. Stark, Chief District 

Judge, United States District Court for the District of 

Delaware, sitting by designation.
No. 12,224.

#### Sinker *v.*Floyd et al.

Beal *Estate.*— Action *for Breach of Covenants in, Deed.*— Real *Party in Interest.*— An action for a breach of covenants contained in a deed must be brought by the real party in interest, viz., the person entitled to the money recovered as damages.

*Pleahisg.*— Complaint.—Cause *of Action.*— Demurrer.—Where the face of a complaint shows a cause of action in a third person, and not in the ' plaintiff, it is bad on demurrer for want of facts.

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

*J. W. Study*and *A. B. Young,*for appellant.

*J. D. Miller*and *F. E. Gavin,*for appellees.

Elliott, J.

The appellant, Alfred T. Sinker, .avers in his complaint that he sues for the use of Sarah A. Coates, and alleges that Mrs. Coates has sustained damages from a breach of the covenants contained in a deed executed to him by the appellees. It is also alleged that Mrs. Coates received from the appellant a deed, with full covenants, for the same land as that described in the deed executed by the appellees.

The position of the appellees’ counsel is, that the complaint shows on its face that Sarah A. Coates is the real party in interest, and that, as the cause' of action is in her, the hppellant can not recover. The appellant’s counsel contend that *292the action may be prosecuted by the immediate grantor for the benefit of his grantee.

Filed Dec. 19, 1885.

We are satisfied that under our code an action for a breach of covenant must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, and that the real party in interest is the person entitled to the money recovered as damages. It is plain that Mrs. Coates, and not Mr. Sinker, is the person entitled to the damages resulting from a breach of the covenants in the deed executed by the appellees. The latter has suffered no loss, and is entitled to no damages, for he has sustained no injury.

Where the face of the complaint shows a cause of action in a third person, and not in the plaintiff, it is bad, because it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. *Pence*v. *Aughe,*101 Ind. 317. It seems quite clear to us that a plaintiff, who shows by the allegations of his pleading that the right of recovery is in another, can not maintain an action. This is the case here, for it affirmatively appears that Mrs. Coates, and not Mr. Sinker, is the only party entitled to recover, as she is the only person who has sustained a loss or suffered an injury.

We need not discuss the question whether Mrs. Coates, as a remote grantee, can maintain an action for the breach of the covenant of seizin, but it is not improper to refer to our decisions upon that question. *Dehority*v. Wright, 101 Ind. 382; *Wright*v. *Nipple,*92 Ind. 310; *Wilson*v. *Peelle,*78 Ind. 384; *Coleman*v. *Lyman,*42 Ind. 289.

Judgment affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 52nd FW conducts CFE treaty exercisePublished Oct. 28, 2019
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Valerie Seelye
                        
                        
                        52nd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                The 52nd Fighter Wing participated in a Conventional Armed Forces in Europe treaty exercise Oct. 24, to verify readiness in the event of a short-notice CFE inspection.
Airmen escorted an exercise inspection team from Romania, members of the **Defense Threat Reduction Agency** and members of the German Verification Agency for an inspection of facilities throughout the installation.
“The wing is required to conduct a full-scale CFE exercise annually,” said Michael Mench, 52nd FW treaty compliance officer.
During an inspection, the teams must be permitted access to any facility on the installation with an entryway measuring two meters or more in width, to include containers that measure two meters or more along all dimensions. The 52nd FW must account for all treaty-limited equipment, including combat aircraft in transit or equipment on cargo aircraft.
“The CFE Treaty was developed during the later stages of the Cold War in order to ease tension and provide transparency of military operations in the European theater,” Mench said. “The numbers of major warfighting equipment were greatly reduced while still allowing for a robust defense. Ceilings on the numbers of warfighting equipment that can be placed in certain areas were designed to prevent surprise offensive buildup.”
The treaty limits the number of battle tanks, artillery pieces, armored combat vehicles, combat aircraft and attack helicopters each participating state party can have within the European area of application. The 52nd FW’s **F-16 Fighting Falcons** count toward the aircraft limit; therefore, the wing is susceptible to a real-world inspection with as little as 43 hours’ notice.
The annual exercise is an important part of the 52nd FW’s mission.
“Treaties are international law, and as such, the wing must always be prepared to show we are in compliance,” Mench said. “At the same time, we must be prepared to protect operational security while a foreign inspection team is conducting an inspection. The full-scale annual exercise helps make sure the 52nd FW is prepared to demonstrate ‘compliance without compromise.’”LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



52nd Fighter Wing 



52nd FW 



CFE 



Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty 



exercise 



Spangdahlem AB 



Spangdahlem Air Base 



USAFE 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe 



Defense Threat Reduction Agency 



DTRA 



f-16 



Fighting Falcon 



training 



readiness 



Romania 



inspection
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
August 18, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 05-10389 Summary Calendar

BRIDGET PARSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WILMER HUTCHINS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

3:03-CV-492-B

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant challenges the dismissal of her suit as a sanction

for her abusive litigation practice and refusal to comply with the

court’s orders.

After the district court warn ed appellant numerous times to

refrain from abusive litigation tactics and follow the court’s2

orders and plaintiff persisted in refusing to heed those warnings,

the court dismissed plaintiff’s suit. The multiple violations of

the court’s orders and instances of appellant’s abusive litigation

practice are recited in detail in its opinion and order of February
17, 2005, and fully support its dismissal of appellant’s suit.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E972]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        THE YEAR OF THE VETERAN

                                 ______

                            HON. RON PACKARD

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. PACKARD. Mr. Speaker, one thing has remained constant throughout 
our Nation's history: The unquestioned loyalty, dedication, and bravery 
of our military personnel. As we mark the fiftieth anniversary of V-E 
Day, we must never forget the price that our troops paid. The sacrifice 
made by our fighting men and women should never be forgotten.
  Driven by a sense of duty, our troops stormed the beaches of Inchon 
and Iwo Jima, staved off encirclements at Bastogne and Chosan, went 
head-to-head with superior numbers at Guadalcanal and Midway, and came 
away victorious. From the battle at Concord Bridge to the final actions 
in Somalia, American troops have proven to the world that they are the 
best in the world.
  In my home State of California, Governor Pete Wilson, the county of 
San Diego, and the cities of San Marcos and Escondido have already 
proclaimed 1995 as the Year of the Veteran. These proclamations call on 
all to remember those that were so quick to answer the call in 
America's time of need.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in honoring all of the 
brave men and women who have put on the uniform to defend their country 
by proclaiming 1995 the Year of the Veteran.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                         Page 14


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brunswick Bancorp and subsidiaries
(the "company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Roman T. Gumina, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the company.


Date: 07/25/06                          /s/ Roman T. Gumina
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Roman T. Gumina
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6227]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the majority 
leader.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6276]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. INOUYE:
       S. 763. A bill to authorize the Secretary of Transportation 
     to issue a certificate of documentation and coastwise trade 
     endorsement for the vessel Evening Star, and for other 
     purposes; to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
     Transportation.
           By Mr. GLENN:
       S. 764. A bill to amend the Indian Child Welfare Act of 
     1978 to require that determinations concerning the status of 
     a child as an Indian child be prospective the child's date of 
     birth, and that determinations of membership status in an 
     Indian tribe be based on the minority status of a member or 
     written consent of an initial member over the age of 18, and 
     for other purposes; to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
           By Mr. McCAIN:
       S. 765. A bill to amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to 
     require the Administrator of General Services to prioritize 
     construction and alteration projects in accordance with 
     merit-based needs criteria, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Governmental Affairs.
     

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,                         *Telephone:*                         703-518-6304.                    

Mary Rupp,

Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-22886 Filed 9-9-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of BioPharma Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December
31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  April 15, 2015 | /s/ Gary Riccio                                                                         
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Gary Riccio, Chief Executive Officer                                                    
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000


<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     1221
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              3425
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           5131
<PP&E>                                     1632
<DEPRECIATION>                             (193)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             9291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      9926
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      2187
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   3
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               9291
<SALES>                                    11733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           11733
<CGS>                                      13614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              13614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           24286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (27760)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (27760)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (27760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.92)


</TABLE>
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2778 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling 

up to $10,000,000 for information on the kidnapping 

and murder of James Foley and Steven Sotloff. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2778 ES

1 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

3 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

4 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

5 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re6 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

7 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

8 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

9 aiding or abetting in the commission of the kidnapping 

10 and murder of James Foley or Steven Sotloff. 

11 (b) LIMITATION.—The total amount of rewards of12 fered under subsection (a) may not exceed $10,000,000, 

13 and the total amount of rewards offered in connection with 

14 the kidnapping and murder of either one of the individuals 

15 named in such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000. 

Passed the Senate September 18, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2778 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards 

Steven Sotloff. the kidnapping and murder of James Foley and totaling up to $10,000,000 for information on
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Scott Keys, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ SCOTT KEYS
Scott KeysExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
 Date: July 28, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 23-0710

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALLEN MISAEL MARTINEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2024

04/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0710
Order filed, June 29, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00534

- CR

____________
EX PARTE KAMILAH A H AMILTON , Appellant

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 1569096A



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 22, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jill Hanby , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4513]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 THE PRESIDENT'S RELEVANCE AND MEDICARE

  (Mr. DeLAY asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DeLAY. Mr. Speaker, earlier this year, Bill Clinton proclaimed he 
was relevant to the legislative process. Since he is still President of 
the United States, I certainly hope he is relevant, but as time goes 
on, I begin to wonder.
  The debate on Medicare is just one example of the President's 
slipping relevance.
  Republicans in the House and Senate are taking steps now to save 
Medicare in the future.
  Our plan will preserve, improve, and protect Medicare far into the 
next century.
  But comprehensive Medicare reform will take bipartisanship, 
statesmanship, and cooperation.
  Unfortunately, the President has decided to walk away from this 
problem. In fact, he has rejected Republican attempts to get the 
administration involved in solving the Medicare problem.
  I urge the President and his advisers to join Republicans in saving 
Medicare.
  Actions speak louder than words, and if the President wants to be 
relevant, he has to act relevant.

                          ____________________
```