[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55604-55605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22667]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-735]


In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products 
Containing the Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 6, 2010, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Spansion LLC of Sunnyvale, California. Letters supplementing the 
complaint were filed on August 17 and August 20, 2010. The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain flash memory chips and products 
containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent No. 7,018,922 (``the `922 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,900,124 
(``the `124 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,459,625 (``the `625 patent''); 
U.S. Patent No. 6,369,416 (``the `416 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and a cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2746.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010).


[[Page 55605]]


    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on September 7, 2010, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain flash memory 
chips and products containing the same that infringe one or more of 
claims 1-7 of the `922 patent; claims 1-10 of the `124 patent; claims 
1-14 of the `625 patent; and claims 1-4 of the `416 patent, and whether 
an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection 
(a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Spansion LLC, 915 DeGuigne Drive, P.O. Box 
3453, Sunnyvale, CA 94088.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 250, Taepyeongno 2-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 
100-742, South Korea.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 Challenger Road, Ridgefield 
Park, NJ 07660.
Samsung International, Inc., 10220 Sorrento Valley Road, San Diego, CA 
92121.
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., 3655 North First Street, San Jose, CA 
95134.
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, 1301 E. Lookout Drive, 
Richardson, TX 75082.
Apple, Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014.
Nokia Corp., Keilalahdentie 4, FIN 0045 Espoo, Finland.
Nokia Inc., 6000 Connection Drive, Irving, TX 75039.
PNY Technologies, Inc., 299 Webro Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054.
Research In Motion Ltd., 295 Phillip Street, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
N2L 3W8.
Research In Motion Corporation, 122 W. John Carpenter Parkway, Suite 
430, Irving, TX 75039.
Transcend Information Inc., No. 70, XingZhong Rd., NeiHu District, 
Taipei, Taiwan.
Transcend Information, Inc. (US), 1645 North Brian Street, Orange, CA 
92867.
Transcend Information Inc. (Shanghai Factory), 4F, Kaixuan City 
Industrial Park, No. 1010, Kaixuan Road, Shanghai, China 200052.

    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-22667 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P