alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5857]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          ADDITIONAL SPONSORS

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 44: Mr. Traficant, Mr. Jefferson, Mrs. Cubin, Mr. 
     Ehrlich, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Sabo, Mr. 
     Pickett, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Peterson of Florida, Mr. Quinn, 
     Mr. Wamp, and Mr. Laughlin.
       H.R. 46: Mr. Kleczka.
       H.R. 393: Mrs. Kennelly and Mr. Torricelli.
       H.R. 408: Mr. Burton of Indiana.
       H.R. 580: Mr. Clinger, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Smith of 
     Texas, Mr. Manton, Ms. Furse, Mr. Shaw, Mrs. Fowler, and Mr. 
     Sisisky.
       H.R. 656 : Ms. Molinari and Ms. Lowey.
       H.R. 858: Mr. McDermott, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Martinez, Ms. 
     Lofgren, Mr. Studds, Mr. Berman, Mr. Clement, Mr. Manton, Mr. 
     Leach, and Mr. Foglietta.
       H.R. 863: Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 922: Mr. Engel and Mr. Romero-Barcelo.
       H.R. 961: Mr. McDade, Mr. Gekas, and Mr. Linder.
       H.R. 967: Mr. Bishop, Mr. Manton, Mr. Gordon, and Ms. 
     Furse.
       H.R. 972: Mr. Stump.
       H.R. 991: Ms. Lowey and Mr. Engel.
       H.R. 1005: Mr. Porter.
       H.R. 1021: Mr. DeFazio, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Borski, and Mr. 
     Shays.
       H.R. 1023: Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. 
     Pelosi, Mr. Fox, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Solomon, 
     Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Barcia of Michigan, Mr. King, 
     Mr. Borski, Mr. Moakley, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Coyne, Mr. Holden, 
     Ms. Norton, and Mr. Foglietta.
       H.R. 1024: Mr. Ganske, Mr. Cooley, and Mr. Smith of Texas.
       H.R. 1026: Mr. Allard, Mr. McInnis, Mr. Schaefer, Mrs. 
     Schroeder, and Mr. Skaggs.
       H.R. 1033: Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Zimmer, Ms. Lowey, and Mr. 
     Baker of California.
       H.R. 1120: Mr. Portman and Mr. Hostettler.
       H.R. 1232: Mr. Lewis of California and Mr. Dooley.
       H.R. 1235: Mr. Meehan, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, and Mr. 
     Barrett of Wisconsin.
       H.R. 1248:  Mr. Yates.
       H.R. 1272:  Mr. Gene Green of Texas.
       H.R. 1274: Mr. Porter, Mr. Reed, Mr. Brown of Ohio, and Mr. 
     Visclosky.
       H.R. 1448: Mr. Bunning of Kentucky.
       H.R. 1469: Mr. Rangel.
       H.R. 1496: Mr. Solomon, Mr. Dellums, and Mr. Ehlers.
       H.R. 1506: Mr. Bono.
       H.J. Res. 41: Mr. Luther.
       H.J. Res. 72: Mr. Livingston.
       H. Res. 21: Mr. Mascara, Mr. Lazio of New York, and Ms. 
     Lofgren.
       H. Res. 118: Mr. Klug, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Dooley, Mr. 
     Gejdenson, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. Hilliard, Ms. Rivers, Mr. 
     Thompson, Mr. Ward, Mr. Evans, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Miller of 
     California, Mr. Abercrombie, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Kolbe, Mrs. 
     Kelly, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Ackerman, and Ms. 
     Furse.
Vol. 141            WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 1, 1995              No. 70
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 Senate
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,349
<SECURITIES>                                   860,977
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,781,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (40,390)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,606,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,777
<BONDS>                                      5,641,969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           746
<OTHER-SE>                                     925,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,606,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,425<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 102,981 OF INTEREST EXPENSE RELATED TO MORTGAGE LOAN ACTIVITIES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 29, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 29, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0035. QUINTUS CORPORATION et al. v. RHETT G. DELANEY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20A707
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11-12945

_____________

D. C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-01375-SCB-TBM

COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION,

PlaintiffCounter-DefendantThird Party DefendantAppellant,

versus

JERRY KATZMAN,

DefendantCounter-ClaimantAppellee,

JARED KATZMAN,

LEE KATZMAN,

MICHELLE KATZMAN,

Third Party PlaintiffsAppellees.

Case: 11-12945 Date Filed: 02/14/2013 Page: 1 of 4 
2

_______________

No. 11-13603

______________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-01375-SCB-TBM

COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION,

PlaintiffCounter-DefendantThird Party DefendantAppellant,

versus

JERRY KATZMAN,

DefendantCounter ClaimantCounter DefendantAppellee,

JOHN DOE I, et al.,

Defendants,

JARED KATZMAN, et al.,

Third Party PlaintiffsCounter Claimants.

Case: 11-12945 Date Filed: 02/14/2013 Page: 2 of 4 
3

____________

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Florida

______________

(February 14, 2013)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BLACK and ALARCÓN,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case involves an employment dispute that went to verdict. The facts 

are simple, but exorbitant motions practice, an inadequate verdict form, sparse jury 

instructions, and perplexing post-trial procedures have led this simple dispute into 

disarray. We in no way credit these deficiencies to the manner in which the district 

court handled this case, but rather to the counsel involved. Plaintiff/Counter 

Defendant/Appellant Comprehensive Care (“CompCare”) appeals the district 

court’s order granting Defendant/Counter Claimant/Appellee Dr. Jerry Katzman’s 

(“Katzman”) renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 50(b) and increasing the jury’s damages verdict from zero to 

$1,306,456.00. CompCare also appeals the district court’s motion for 

reconsideration, as well as the attorneys’ fee award to Katzman. The appeals have 

been consolidated. 

 

*

Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting 

by designation.

Case: 11-12945 Date Filed: 02/14/2013 Page: 3 of 4 
4

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit 

of oral argument, we conclude a new trial for liability and damages is necessary 

given the circumstances of this case. Therefore, we reverse the Rule 50(b) 

judgment and order awarding attorneys’ fees and remand this case for a new trial 

on liability and damages. 

REVERSED and REMANDED. 

Case: 11-12945 Date Filed: 02/14/2013 Page: 4 of 4
10-K


Exhibit 32.1


April 1, 2024


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:


(1)    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document. In giving the foregoing certifications, the undersigned has relied to the extent she considers reasonable on information provided to her by Diversified Energy Company PLC.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Sarah NewellSarah NewellVice President
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00188-CV

____________________

CHARLOTTE PATTY MCKINLEY, Appellant

V.

OPTIMIST VILLAGE INC., Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 23510A 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Charlotte Patty McKinley appealed the denial of her motion to dismiss. See 

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(12) (West Supp. 2015). Counsel 

for the appellant filed a suggestion of death and motion to withdraw as counsel

because it has not agreed to represent the estate. The appellee, Optimist Village 

Inc., filed a motion to lift the stay in this accelerated appeal and to dismiss this 

interlocutory appeal as moot.
2

The motion to lift the stay of further proceedings in the trial court is granted. 

The appeal is abated for thirty days, and the case is remanded to the trial court so 

that the trial court may decide whether to sign an order of non-suit and determine 

whether the entire case is moot. A supplemental record containing any orders 

signed by the trial court and any documents filed with the trial court in connection 

with this matter, together with a reporter’s record of any hearing conducted 

pursuant to this Order, shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by September 29, 

2016. The appeal will be reinstated without further order on that date.

ORDER ENTERED August 30, 2016.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2793 

AN ACT 

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to Henry 

Johnson. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2793 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

2 OF HONOR TO HENRY JOHNSON FOR ACTS OF 

3 VALOR DURING WORLD WAR I. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith5 standing the time limitations specified in section 3744 of 

6 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

7 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

8 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

9 the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to 

10 Henry Johnson for the acts of valor during World War 

11 I described in subsection (b). 

12 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

13 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Henry 

14 Johnson while serving as a member of Company C, 369th 

15 Infantry Regiment, 93rd Division, American Expedi16 tionary Forces, during combat operations against the 

17 enemy on the front lines of the Western Front in France 

18 on May 15, 1918, during World War I for which he was 

19 previously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. 

Passed the Senate September 18, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2793 

AN ACT 

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to 

Henry Johnson.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6368]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              NOMINATIONS

  Executive nominations received by the Senate May 9, 1995:
                         department of defense

       John P. White, of Massachusetts, to be Deputy Secretary of 
     Defense, vice John M. Deutch.
     

                          ____________________
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2987 

To expand the boundary of Fort Frederica National Monument in the State 

of Georgia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To expand the boundary of Fort Frederica National 

Monument in the State of Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Frederica Na5 tional Monument Boundary Expansion Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORT FREDERICA NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA. 

7 (a) MAXIMUM ACREAGE.—The first section of the 

8 Act of May 26, 1936 (16 U.S.C. 433g) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘two hundred and fifty acres’’ and inserting ‘‘525 

10 acres’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2987 IS

1 (b) BOUNDARY EXPANSION.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Fort 

3 Frederica National Monument in the State of Geor4 gia is modified to include the land generally depicted 

5 as ‘‘Proposed Acquisition Areas’’ on the map enti6 tled ‘‘Fort Frederica National Monument Proposed 

7 Boundary Expansion’’, numbered 369/127,249, and 

8 dated November 2014. 

9 (2) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map described 

10 in paragraph (1) shall be on file and available for 

11 public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 

12 National Park Service. 

13 (3) ACQUISITION OF LAND.—The Secretary of 

14 the Interior may acquire the land and interests in 

15 land described in paragraph (1) by donation or pur16 chase with donated or appropriated funds from will17 ing sellers only. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip Jones,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 16, 2009





/s/Philip
      JonesPhilip
      JonesChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4673]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER. Will the gentlewoman from North Carolina [Mrs. Clayton] 
come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mrs. CLAYTON led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.

                          ____________________
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00122-CV

Northpoint Jaguar, Inc. d/b/a Chase Motor Credit

v.

Billy Alkabouni

On Appeal from the

157th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-52534A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 12, 2021
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4454]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 PERMISSION FOR CERTAIN COMMITTEES TO SIT ON TODAY DURING THE 5-MINUTE 
                                  RULE

  Mr. LIVINGSTON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the 
following committees and their subcommittees be permitted to sit today 
while the House is meeting in the Committee of the Whole House under 
the 5-minute rule:
  The Committee on Banking and Financial Services;
  The Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities;
  The Committee on Government Reform and Oversight; and
  The Committee on International Relations.
  It is my understanding that the minority has been consulted and that 
there is no objection to these requests.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Louisiana?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, inc. (the *“Company* ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”* ),
      I,
      Philip Jones, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2007


/s/Philip JonesPhilip
                      Jones
                    Acting
                      Chief Financial Officer
                    (Vice
                      President of Finance)


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
      Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
#### CHANNEL COMPANIES, INC. v. CINNAMINSON SHIPPING CENTER, INC.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
RESIGNATION OF


	
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


	
OF


	
ARKADIA INTERNATIONAL















The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held on this 6th day of October, 2014

















The Board of Directors who were present for this meeting & took active part therein were:







Vladimir Shekhtman







WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to formally RESIGN and renounce all further corporate designation or affiliation with ARKADIA INTERNATIONAL












NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the corporation having considered this matter, has opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue, has decided unanimously and RESOLVED that: I do hereby formally RESIGN, and sever any and all officials ties, duties, obligations or liabilities regarding ARKADIA INTERNATIONAL, and do hereby, by affixing, my signatures hereto, officially as my last corporate act, DO HEREBY RESIGN.







The Director of the corporation, by affixing her signature hereto, does hereby formally resign, and shall allow the new Board to choose its Directors at a time and place of its choosing.

















DATED:      6th October, 2014












_/s/ Vladmir Shekhtman____________


VLADMIR SHEKHTMAN, Director,


Arkadia International
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of First Rate Staffing Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



| | /s/ Cliff Blake        
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | Chief Executive Officer



Date: April 11, 2013
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 299 

To prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section 

642(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 

Act of 1996. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mrs. FISCHER, and Mr. SESSIONS) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section 642(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform 

and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION OF COPS FUNDING FOR SANC4 TUARY CITIES. 

5 None of the amounts appropriated in any Act for the 

6 Community Oriented Policing Services Program may be 

7 used in contravention of section 642(a) of the Illegal ImVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:52 Feb 23, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S299.IS S299

PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 299 IS

1 migration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 

2 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1373(a)). 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS