alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force directs commanders to review unit emblems, mottos, nicknames, other official symbologyPublished Jan. 5, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force directed commanders to conduct a comprehensive review of official and unofficial unit emblems, morale patches, mottos, nicknames, coins and other forms of unit recognition and identity to ensure an inclusive and professional environment within 60 days from Dec. 23, 2020.
Commanders, at the squadron level and above, will remove any visual representation, symbols or language derogatory to any race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, age or disability status to ensure an inclusive and professional environment.
The directive came in the form of a memorandum from **Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett**, **Air Force Chief of Staff Charles Q. Brown, Jr.**, and **Chief of Space Operations John W. Raymond**.
“It is critical for the Department of the Air Force to embody an environment of dignity, respect and inclusivity for all Airmen and Guardians,” the memo stated. “Our core values demand we hold ourselves to high standards and maintain a culture of respect and trust in our chain of command.”
According to ***Air Force Instruction 84-105, “Organizational Lineage, Honors and Heraldry,”*** emblem designs and mottos should reflect favorably on the United States Air Force, be original, distinctive, dignified, in good taste and non-controversial.
“Their continued use (of derogatory symbols and language) ostracizes our teammates undermining unit cohesion and impeding our mission readiness and success ... Our diversity of experience, culture, demographics and perspectives is a force multiplier and essential to our success in this dynamic global environment ... We must ensure all our Airmen and Guardians are valued and respected,” the memo emphasized.
Commanders should consider emblem and motto guidance in AFI 84-105 and consult their historians, staff judge advocates and equal opportunity specialists during the review.LOE 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



space force 



CSAF 



Air Force Chief of Staff Charles Q. Brown 



Jr. 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett 



Airmen 



guardians 



core values 



dignity 



respect 



inclusivity 



AFWN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00160-CR

Joseph Lewis White, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 00-6063, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Joseph Lewis White guilty of four counts of sexual assault of

a child. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.011(a)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2004-05). The jury assessed a

seventeen-year term of imprisonment for each count.

Appellant’s attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without

merit. The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); see also Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal isfrivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: October 28, 2004

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Alyson M. Mount, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.








Date:  March 29, 2017





By:  /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


of Entergy Louisiana, LLC as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
News United States Air Force
 U.S. Air Force B-52s deploy to EuropePublished March 15, 2019
                        
                        By 501st Combat Support Wing Public Affairs
                **RAF ALCONBURY, U.K. (AFNS) --**
                A Bomber Task Force deployment of B-52 Stratofortress aircraft, Airmen and support equipment from the 2nd Bomb Wing, Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, have arrived in the U.S. European Command area of operations for a deployment to conduct theater integration and flying training, March 14.
The aircraft will operate out of RAF Fairford, United Kingdom. The deployment of strategic bombers to the U.K. helps exercise RAF Fairford as United States Air Forces in Europe’s forward operating location for bombers.
The deployment also includes joint and allied training in the U.S. European Command theater to improve bomber interoperability. Training with joint partners, allied nations and other U.S. Air Force units contributes to our ready and postured forces and enables us to build enduring and strategic relationships necessary to confront a broad range of global challenges.B-52 



Stratofortress 



2nd Bomb Wing 



Barksdale Air Force Base 



European command 



training 



RAF Fairford 



readiness 



Command Bomber Task Force 



RAF Alconbury Related Links
        U.S. Air Force B-52s deploy to Europe
                                March 14, 2019
                                A Bomber Task Force deployment of B-52 Stratofortress aircraft, Airmen and support equipment have arrived in the U.S. European Command area of operations for a deployment to conduct theater integration and flying training.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force seeks 2018 national public service nominationsPublished June 25, 2018
                        
                        By Richard Salomon
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                
Air Force officials are accepting submissions for the 2018 National Public Service Award.
The American Society for Public Administration and the National Academy of Public Administration established the award to honor individuals whose outstanding contributions and accomplishments serve as models of public service in and out of the work environment. 
This award is open to both military and Defense Department civilian employees. A committee from ASPA and NAPA will review nominations and select up to five award recipients who have spent a significant portion of their career as public service practitioners at the federal, state, local or international levels of government, or in nonprofit organizations that provided direct public service.
NPSA winners are those who have, on a sustained basis, done some or all of the following:
- Made a profound difference to improve service to the public
- Been willing to take risks to achieve change
- Fostered a more democratic society
- Served as champions of social equity
- Changed the way a governmental organization operates so that it better achieves its goals
- Achieved substantial savings in government operations
- Developed a cadre of other government leaders
- Contributed to the communities in which they live
Those considering nomination or nominating another are highly encouraged to review past winners and submit nominees who have similar credentials. For a full description of the award and to review information on previous winners, visit the American Society for Public Administration website.
Organizations and base-level personnel must contact their major commands, combatant commands, field operating agencies, direct reporting units or major command equivalent agency for applicable suspense dates and additional information regarding nomination procedures. Each MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA and DRU may submit one nomination. All nomination packages are due to the Air Force Personnel Center by Aug. 3, 2018.
Specific eligibility and application procedures for the NPSA award are available via myPers. Select “Any” from the dropdown menu and search “NPSA” from a CAC-enabled, .mil computer. For more information about Air Force awards, visit http://www.afpc.af.mil/Recognition/AFPC 



Air Force Personnel Center 



award 



public service 



nomination 



American Society for Public Administration 



National Academy of Public Administration 



ASPA 



NAPA 



career
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55616-55617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22886]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  10 a.m., Thursday, September 16, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Briefing on Dodd-Frank Act Implementation.
    2. Final Rule--Part 701 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Secondary 
Capital Accounts.
    3. Final Rule--Part 701 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Short-
term, Small amount Loans.
    4. Vantage Credit Union's Appeal of Region IV's Denial of its 
Request to Convert to a Federal Community Charter.
    5. Insurance Fund Report.
    6. Adoption of FASAB Standards for Financial Reporting on the 
National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund.
    7. National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund Premium.

RECESS: 11:15 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, September 16, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Delegations of Authority (3). Closed pursuant to some or all of 
the following exemptions: (2), (8), (9)(A)(ii) and (B).

[[Page 55617]]

    2. Consideration of Supervisory Activities. Closed pursuant to 
exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22886 Filed 9-9-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
H 4672 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE May 9, 1995

‘‘(B) CONSULTATION WITH STATES.—In selecting projects to carry out under this section, the Administrator shall consult with

States in which the Administrator is considering carrying out a project.

‘‘(C) ALLOCATION OF AMOUNTS.—In determining an amount to allocate to carry out a

project to restore and recover waters of the

United States from damages described in

paragraph (4), the Administrator shall, in

the case of a priority project under subparagraph (A), take into account the total

amount deposited in the general fund of the

Treasury as a result of enforcement actions

conducted with respect to such violation

pursuant to this section or section 505(a)(1).

‘‘(6) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Administrator

may carry out a project under this subsection either directly or by making grants

to, or entering into contracts with, the Secretary of the Army or any other public or

private entity.

‘‘(7) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1

year after the date of the enactment of this

subsection, and every 2 years thereafter, the

Administrator shall transmit to Congress a

report on implementation of this subsection.’’.

(d) USE OF CIVIL PENALTIES FOR MITIGATION

PROJECTS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 309(d) (33 U.S.C.

1319(d)) is amended by inserting after the

second sentence the following: ‘‘The court

may, in the court’s discretion, order that a

civil penalty be used for carrying out mitigation projects which are consistent with the

purposes of this Act and which enhance the

public health or environment.’’.

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

505(a) (33 U.S.C. 1365(a)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the

last sentence the following: ‘‘, including ordering the use of a civil penalty for carrying

out mitigation projects in accordance with

section 309(d)’’.

H.R. 961

OFFERED BY: MR. WYDEN

AMENDMENT NO. 55: Page 251, after line 2,

insert the following:

‘‘(C) PREVENTION OF REDUCTION IN FAIR

MARKET VALUE OF PRIVATE HOMES.—No compensation shall be made under this section

with respect to an agency action that prevents or restricts any activity that is likely

to result in a total reduction in the fair market value of one or more private homes of

$10,000 or more.

Page 315, after line 15, insert the following:

‘‘(K) PRIVATE HOME.—The term ‘private

home’ means any owner occupied dwelling,

including any multi-family dwelling and any

condominium.

Page 315, line 16, strike ‘‘(K)’’ and insert

‘‘(L)’’.

Page 315, line 19, strike ‘‘(L)’’ and insert

‘‘(M)’’.

Page 315, line 21, strike ‘‘(M)’’ and insert

‘‘(N)’’.

Page 316, line 14, strike ‘‘(N)’’ and insert

‘‘(O)’’.

H.R. 961

OFFERED BY: MR. YOUNG OF ALASKA

AMENDMENT NO. 56: On page 72, after line

10, insert the following:

‘‘(e) SECONDARY TREATMENT STANDARDS.—

Subsection 301(h) (33 U.S.C. 1311(h)) is

amended by striking ‘of the biological oxygen demanding material and’’’.
Exhibit 23.2



LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

We hereby consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement of Memorial Production
Partners LP on Form S-8 (File No. 333-178493) and the 2011 annual report on Form 10-K (the Annual Report) of Memorial Production Partners LP of our report, dated February 8, 2012, with respect to estimates of reserves and future net
revenues of Memorial Production Partners LP, as of December 31, 2011, and to all references to our firm included in the Annual Report. We further consent to the reference to our firm as experts in this Annual Report.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ C.H. (Scott) Rees IIIC.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

March 30, 2012



Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients. The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI. The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations,
and conditions stated in the original document. In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY BRADSHAW.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied. (See 170 *N.J.Super.*527)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNM920000 L13100000 FI0000; OKNM 121969]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
OKNM 121969, Oklahoma

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Class II provisions of Title IV of the Federal Oil 
and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982, the Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease OKNM 
121969 from the lessee(s), Brower Oil & Gas, Inc., for lands in Garvin 
County, Oklahoma. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by 
all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margie Dupre, Bureau of Land 
Management, New Mexico State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New 
Mexico 87502-0115 or at (505) 954-2142.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued that affects 
the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties of $10 per acre or a fraction thereof, per year, and 16 \2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500 administrative 
fee for the reinstatement of the lease and the $166 cost for publishing 
this Notice in the Federal Register. The lessee met all the 
requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) 
and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are 
proposing to reinstate lease OKNM 121969, effective the date of 
termination, May 1, 2010, under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Margie Dupre,
Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.
[FR Doc. 2010-22963 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                           The Schedule contains summary financial  information 
                           extracted   from  the   financial   statements   for
                           Cambridge  Advantaged  Properties  II  L.P.  and  is
                           qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                           financial statements                                
                              
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-25-1998             
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-26-1997       
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-25-1997    
<CASH>                          1,303,486                    
<SECURITIES>                    0                            
<RECEIVABLES>                   0                            
<ALLOWANCES>                    0                            
<INVENTORY>                     0                            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,049,133                    
<PP&E>                          120,889,451                  
<DEPRECIATION>                  43,945,448                   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  83,566,959                   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           14,361,889                   
<BONDS>                         98,147,831                   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                            
<PREFERRED>                     0                            
<COMMON>                        0                            
<OTHER-SE>                      (28,942,761)                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    83,566,959                             
<SALES>                         0                            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,458,837                    
<CGS>                           0                            
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0                            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,420,749                    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0                            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,867,562                    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (829,474)                    
<INCOME-TAX>                    0                            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0                            
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 55,000                       
<CHANGES>                       0                            
<NET-INCOME>                    (774,474)                    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (106)                        
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0                            
                                  
                                



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4598]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Kingston] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. KINGSTON addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Andrew J. Cozby, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Memorial Production Partners LP; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                    
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Andrew J. Cozby                                                                                                                
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Andrew J. Cozby Chief Financial Officer
Memorial Production Partners GP LLC (as general partner of
Memorial Production Partners LP)