alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 First Sergeant Academy to increase course length, improve skillsPublished Oct. 25, 2018
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Charles Welty
                        
                        
                        Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force’s First Sergeant Academy is increasing resident class length to four weeks to help fuel the chief of staff of the Air Force’s initiative to revitalize squadrons.
The updated curriculum, which began Oct. 22, focuses more on hands-on, scenario-based training to better prepare first sergeants for their role in the squadron command team, an issue identified by the chief master sergeant of the Air Force and other senior enlisted leaders.
“Revitalizing the squadron is a pulse of our Air Force,” said Chief Master Sgt. Manny Pineiro, first sergeant special duty manager. “When it comes to taking care of our Airmen, there is no better way to do it than having a first sergeant, so the improved course is something that is way overdue.”
The FSA discontinued the distance learning course for first sergeants because of the increased focus on hands-on and immersive learning.
“Prior to the four-week course, we had a distance learning course,” said Senior Master Sgt. Candice Fitzmaurice, FSA director of resources. “First sergeants really weren’t getting what they needed from that course, so not only will they be going through the lessons, but they will now get more hands-on training.”
By discontinuing the distance learning portion of the curriculum, the FSA will now focus on enhancing invaluable skills such as alternate dispute resolution, resiliency, advanced counseling, Uniform Code of Military Justice/Article 15 training as well as increased engagement with former commanders.
“We are preparing the first sergeants for an opportunity to have a little bit more (situational awareness) as an advisor in the command leadership team,” Pineiro said. “Prior to this new four-week course, two weeks just wasn’t enough time to actually train them correctly. What we did now is give them an opportunity to get more comfortable and more confident so they can be prepared to get out there and take care of their business.”
With the course enhancements in place, the FSA team said they hope this will help offset the decrease in average first sergeant experience, prepare first sergeants to handle current and emerging issues in complex environments, and to enhance performance as part of the command team.
The FSA serves the Total Force, and is a component of Air University’s Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education.CSAF 



CMSAF 



training 



first sergeant 



Air Education and Training Command 



senior 



leader 



update 



squadrons 



initiative 



revitalize 



First Sergeant Academy 



AETC
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2965 

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing hazardous humanitarian services in West Africa to combat the spread of the 2014 Ebola 

virus outbreak shall be entitled to tax benefits in the same manner 

as if such services were performed in a combat zone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2014 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing 

hazardous humanitarian services in West Africa to combat the spread of the 2014 Ebola virus outbreak shall 

be entitled to tax benefits in the same manner as if 

such services were performed in a combat zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Operation United As5 sistance Tax Exclusion Act of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2965 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HAZARDOUS HUMANI2 TARIAN SERVICE AS COMBAT ZONE SERVICE 

3 FOR PURPOSES OF THE COMBAT ZONE COM4 PENSATION EXCLUSION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 112 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, service by a qualified 

7 member of the Armed Forces during Operation United As8 sistance shall be treated as service in a combat zone in 

9 the same manner as if the President of the United States 

10 had by Executive order designated the Ebola virus disease 

11 outbreak area as an area of combat under section 

12 112(c)(2) of such Code. 

13 (b) DEFINITIONS.— 

14 (1) QUALIFIED MEMBER OF THE ARMED

15 FORCES.—The term ‘‘qualified member of the 

16 Armed Forces’’ means a member of the Armed 

17 Forces serving in Operation United Assistance who 

18 is required to undergo a program of not less than 

19 21 days of controlled monitoring in a controlled 

20 monitoring area upon the individual’s return from 

21 the Ebola virus disease outbreak area. 

22 (2) OPERATION UNITED ASSISTANCE.—The 

23 term ‘‘Operation United Assistance’’ means the mis24 sion beginning in September 2014 in the Ebola virus 

25 disease outbreak area. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2965 IS

1 (3) EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE OUTBREAK AREA.— 

2 The term ‘‘Ebola virus disease outbreak area’’ 

3 means Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea, and any 

4 other region designated by the Centers for Disease 

5 Control and Prevention as experiencing a widespread 

6 Ebola virus disease outbreak as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4541]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  APPOINTMENT AS MEMBERS OF UNITED STATES DELEGATION OF MEXICO-UNITED 
                    STATES INTER-PARLIAMENTARY GROUP

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Regula). Without objection, and pursuant 
to the provisions of 22 U.S.C. 276h, the Chair announces the Speaker's 
appointment of the following Members of the House as members of the 
United States delegation of the Mexico-United States Interparliamentary 
Group for the first session of the 104th Congress: Mr. Ballenger of 
North Carolina, vice chairman; Mr. Gilman of New York; Mr. Dreier of 
California; Mr. Salmon of Arizona; Mr. Hayworth of Arizona; Mr. 
Brownback of Kansas; Mr. de la Garza of Texas; Mr. Gejdenson of 
Connecticut; Mr. Coleman of Texas; Mr. Miller of California; and Mr. 
Rangel of New York.
  There was no objection.
  

                          ____________________
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judg es Elder, Felton an d Senior Judge Willis

DEBRA (WALKE R) SCOTT MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 28 30-02-2 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 11, 2003 TONY SCOTT

FROM THE CIRCUIT COUR T OF POWHATAN COUNTY Thomas V. Wa rren, Judge (William Mills Krieger, on brief), for appellant. Appellant submitting on brief. No brief for appellee.

Debra (Walker) Scott (wife) appeals the deci sion of the circuit court dism issing her bill of comp laint seekin g a divorce from Tony Scott (husband). On appeal, wife contends the trial court erred by findin g husband, a prisoner , could not waive the appointment of a guardian ad litem . Wife asks that we reverse the trial court's or der dismissing the ca se and remand for consideration upon the merits. Upon reviewing the record and opening brief, we agree with wife and reverse. Background Wife filed a bill of complaint seek ing a divorce from husband on January 20, 2002. She asserted they ha d been separated for over one year. Husban d was incarcerat ed at the time and submitted

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.to the court a waiver of right to guardian ad litem on February 4, 2002, waiving his rights to be represen ted in the divorce and requesting the court no t appoint a guardian ad litem . The trial court dismissed the action, hold ing that the ap pointment of a guardian ad litem cannot be waived. Analysis "Convicts are not civilly dead in Virginia, and . . . [are] not legally incompetent to transact business either before or after [a] conviction in the criminal case." Dunn v. Terry , 216 Va. 234, 239, 217 S.E.2d 849, 854 (1975). "[T]he appointment of a [guardian ad litem is] a procedural provision which [can] be waived by a prisoner." Cross v. Sundin , 222 Va. 37, 38, 278 S.E.2d 805, 806 (1981); see also Pigg v. Commonwealth , 17 Va. App. 756, 760, 441 S.E.2d 216, 219 (1994) (en banc). Husband permissibly waived his right to the appointment of a guardian ad litem , and the trial court erred by dismissing the action. Accordingly, we reverse and remand. Reversed and remanded.

- 2 -
News United States Air Force
 Air Force senior leaders update OCP uniform guidancePublished April 23, 2019
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force announced April 23 new rules on Operational Camouflage Pattern uniforms that aim to better fit the needs of Airmen and the jobs they do while also holding fast to tradition. The changes highlighted include authorization of the two-piece Flight Duty Uniform in garrison and updated patch guidance for the OCP uniform. “During the initial rollout of the OCP, we originally matched our sister services regarding patch configurations as we sought to emphasize our role as a joint warfighting force,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein. “In response to overwhelming feedback received from Airmen, we will make an easy ‘sleeve swap’ of the patch configuration to further elevate our focus on honoring the heritage of squadrons as the war-fighting units of the world’s greatest Air Force. We will now place the squadron patch on the right sleeve along with the U.S. flag and move the higher headquarters patch to the left sleeve of the OCP.” Additionally, to provide commanders with expanded uniform options to fit myriad missions, on April 15, the two-piece flight suit, otherwise known as the 2PFDU, will be authorized to be worn in both garrison and deployed locations. The 2PFDU continues an effort to provide Airmen with improved form, fit and function to perform their duties in any environment. The traditional flight duty uniform will also continue to be an option. Squadron commanders will now have the flexibility to make combat uniform decisions based on what is best for their Airmen to meet mission requirements. “The new unit patch configuration of the OCP and 2PFDU also aligns with the traditional FDU, elevating the significance of squadron focus and identity, which supports CSAF’s intent to revitalize squadrons,” said Lt. Gen. Mark D. Kelly, Headquarters Air Force deputy chief of staff for Air Force operations. In May 2018, Air Force leaders decided to transition to the OCP following feedback from Airmen that it is the best, battle-tested utility uniform available. It will also eliminate the need to maintain two separate uniforms – one for in-garrison and one for deployments. The service expects to fully transition to OCPs by April 1, 2021. For more information, Airmen should view Air Force Guidance Memorandum 2019-01 and check Air Force Instruction 36-2903 for updates, which are available on the public website of the Air Force’s Personnel Center at **https://www.afpc.af.mil/Career-Management/Dress-and-Appearance/**.SAF 



SecAF 



AF 



Air Force OCP 



uniform 



guidance 



Operational Camouflage Pattern 



flight duty uniform 



LR 



rules 



2PFDU
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anonima bursatil de capital variable under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officers
knowledge:



|1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 29, 2014



By:

/s/ Enrique BeltranenaEnrique BeltranenaChief Executive Officer


April 29, 2014



By:

/s/ Fernando SuárezFernando SuárezChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Controladora Vuela
Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. and will be retained by Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 15

August 13, 1998

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

We are aware that Cyprus Amax Minerals Company has included our report dated
August 13, 1998 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 71) in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1998, which is incorporated by reference in each of the following:

  (a) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-1600, 33-22939 and 33-53792)
      with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Savings Plan and Trust.

  (b) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-1603, 33-21501 and 33-53794)
      with respect to the Management Incentive Program of Cyprus Amax Minerals
      Company and its participating subsidiaries.

  (c) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-52812) with respect to the
      Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.

  (d) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-51011) with respect to the 1988
      Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.

  (e) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-61141) with respect to the
      Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Thrift Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees.

  (f) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-36413) with respect to the Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Savings
      Plan and Trust.

  (g) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-54097), as amended,  with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
      and Cyprus Amax Finance Corporation.

  (h) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-54097) with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company $250 million
      7( percent Notes due May 15, 2007.

  (i) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-62145) with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and Cyprus
      Amax Finance Corporation $600 million Shelf Registration.

We are also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.

Yours very truly,



/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EXHIBIT
      31.1




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Leslie
      I. Handler, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Encompass Holdings, Inc.




2.  Based
      on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
      or
      omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
      of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
      respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on my
      knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in
      this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings, Inc. as of, and
      for,
      the periods presented in this report;




4.  I
      are
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:




a.  Designed
      such
      disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
      to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this report is being prepared;




b.  Evaluated
      the
      effectiveness of Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation.




Date:
      November 15, 2006


/s/
      LESLIE I. HANDLER


Leslie
      I.
      Handler


President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4563]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           REMOVAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 743

  Mr. FATTAH. Mr. Speaker, I rise to ask unanimous consent to remove my 
name as cosponsor of H.R. 743, the Teamwork for Employees and 
Management Act.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Pennsylvania?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN JOHNSON, JR.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 F-35 multilateral conference sets stage for operational integration in Indo-PacificPublished March 18, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Hailey Haux
                        
                        
                        Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii (AFNS) --**
                F-35 Lightning II subject matter experts from the United States, Australia, Japan and South Korea met to improve 4th and 5th generation aircraft theater interoperability during the second Pacific F-35 User Group Conference at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, March 12 -14.More than 80 personnel from the four nations discussed bed down and strategic concepts, operations, logistics and sustainment topics, all building on the success of the March 2017 F-35 Symposium.“This conference provides a great opportunity to work with our allies to strengthen our interoperability with 5th and 4th generation aircraft as these airframes start to become more prominent in the region,” said Gen. CQ Brown Jr., Pacific Air Forces commander. “Improving interoperability between our forces and helping allies increase their capabilities works to deter aggression, maintain stability and ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific.”This year’s theme “operational integration in the Indo-Pacific” focused on security, interoperability, training, simulators and logistics information systems.As the presence of the F-35 increases in the Indo-Pacific, future multilateral exercises will enhance 5th generation aircraft interoperability and integration, as well as agile command and control across the full spectrum of combined warfighter operations.“It’s how we take advantage of all the capabilities we have in the region,” Brown said. “The F-35 will bring a full spectrum of capabilities to us and will be a critical part of joint and coalition efforts.”The Marine Corps currently has F-35Bs based at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan, and Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, is projected to house future F-35A squadrons starting in 2020. The Air Force last deployed F-35As to the region in 2017, with the 34th Fighter Squadron from Hill AFB, Utah, going to Kadena Air Base, Japan, for a six-month deployment.The F-35’s advanced technologies and sensors, in conjunction with other multi-domain systems to collect, fuse and distribute information will lead to unprecedented battlespace awareness, survivability, and lethality in future highly contested environments.“Right now we have all the right people in the right place at the right time,” Brown said. “With that we can address change, identify areas that require additional work, and initiate measurable progress to close gaps. As we posture for the future, remember that we’re stronger and more effective when we work together.”PACAF 



F-35 



multilateral 



Conference 



operational 



integration 



Indo-Pacific 



JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam 



Australia 



Japan 



South Korea 



Lightning II 



logistics 



sustainment 



AF 



Air Force
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: JIMMY LEE SWEED,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 17

- 00051

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jimmy Lee Sweed

, ha s filed a mandamus petition asking that we issue the writ of

mandamus against the Honorable Gonzalo Garcia, Judge of the 210 th District Court in El Paso

County, Texas. Relator requests that we order Responde nt to file his motion seeking permission

to file a civil suit against several parties. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator generally must meet two requirements. First,

the relator must show that the tri al court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id . at 136.

On February 20, 2008, the 210th District Court determined that Relator is a vexatious

litigant and entered a pre

- filing order pursuant to Section 11.101 of the Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code. See T EX .C IV .P RAC .&R EM .C ODE A NN

. § 1 1.101 (West 2016 ) ; s ee also Sweed v.

Nye , 319 S.W.3d 791 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 2010, pet. denied)(affirming vexatious litigant order).- 2

-

Under Section 11.102, a vexatious litigant is prohibited from filing, pro se, new litigation in a court

to which the order applies without seek ing the permission of the local administrative judge of the

type of court in which the vexatious litigant intends to file. See T EX .C IV .P RAC .&R EM .C ODE A NN

.

§ 11.102 (West 2016 ). Additionally, the pre

- filing order required Relator to deposit $5,000 into

th e registry of the court as a pre

- condition to filing any new suit . Sweed’s petition reflects that he

sought permission from Respondent rather than the local administrative judge as required by

Section 11.102. Finding that R elator ha s failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus re lief , we

deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

March 1 4 , 2017

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.