alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22697]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences 
(<greek-i>1110).
    Date and Time: October 6, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    October 7, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Hotel Boulderado, 2115 13th Street, Boulder, CO 80302.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Chuck Liarakos, National Science Foundation, 
Room 605, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Tel No.: (703) 
292-8400.
    Purpose of Meeting: The Advisory Committee for BIO provides 
advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program 
emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities 
of the divisions that make up BIO.

AGENDA

October 6, 2010

    AM: Introductions and Updates; Presentation and Discussion--
Innovation Experiments; Research Resources.
    PM: Presentation and Discussion--Science, Arts and Humanities 
Symposium; COV Reports; COV Updates; New Ideas; Recognition of 
Departing BIO AC Members.

October 7, 2010

    National Ecological Observatory Network, Inc.: NEON Overview and 
Status, Discussion and Presentation; Tours of NEON Technical 
Facility and Table Mountain Prototype Site.


     Dated: September 8, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-22697 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
T HE S TATE EX REL
. G ONZALES , A PPELLANT , v. I NDUSTRIAL C OMMISSION OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , ET AL
. [Cite as State ex rel. Gonzales v. Indus. Comm. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Workers’ compensation – Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-1097 – Submitted October 27, 1998 – Decided December 30, 1998.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD02-216.

__________________ Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A. , and William R. Menacher , for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery , Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

__________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
M OYER , C.J., D OUGLAS , R ESNICK , F.E. S WEENEY , P FEIFER , C OOK and
L UNDBERG S TRATTON , JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

National Defense University, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

      ( print page 55576)    

# SUMMARY:

The National Defense University (NDU), Designated Federal Officer, has scheduled a meeting of the Board of Visitors for November 4 and 5, 2010, in Washington, DC. The National Defense University Board of Visitors is a Federal Advisory Board. The Board meets twice a year in proceedings that are open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 4 (from 11:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.) and November 5, 2010 (from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.).

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Marshall Hall, Building 62, Room 155, the National Defense University, 300 5th Avenue, SW., Fort McNair, Washington, DC 20319-5066.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The point of contact for this notice is Ms. Dolores Hodge at (202) 685-0082, Fax (202) 685-7707 or                         *HodgeD@ndu.edu.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The future agenda will include discussion on Defense transformation, faculty development, facilities, information technology, curriculum development, post 9/11 initiatives as well as other operational issues and areas of interest affecting the day-to-day operations of the National Defense University and its components. The meeting is open to the public; limited space made available for observers will be allocated on a first come, first served basis. Written statements to the committee may be submitted to the committee at any time or in response to a stated planned meeting agenda by fax or e-mail to the point of contact person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    . Include in the Subject Line: “Comment/Statement to the NDU BOV.”                

Dated: September 8, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-22754 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
September 1 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDA WHITE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00458

- CV V.

PRIMOSE AT HERITAGE PARK , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 11, 2015. Having considered the
motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Freda White.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Shumaker *v.*Stultz

[No. 18,712.

Filed January 10, 1956.]

*152
      *Richard S. Hilmer,*of Albion, for appellant.

*George L. Rulison,-*of Ligonier, and *Harry E. Vernon,*of Goshen, for appellee.

Crumpacker, J.

The appellant brought this suit to recover the value of certain work and labor he claims to have performed for the appellee at his special instance and request. At the close of the appellant’s case the court directed a verdict for the appellee upon which judgment was duly entered. The appellant charges that this was error but his brief contains no recital of the evidence in any form or place and we have no way of judging whether or not he made a case which was entitled to go to the jury without resort to the record. This we are not required to do for the purpose of discovering grounds for reversal. *Getto*v. *Getto*(1947), 117 Ind. App. 623, 73 N. E. 2d 350. As all assigned error in this appeal requires a consideration of the evidence for determination, the appellant’s brief presents no question.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 153.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**INVISA,
      INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Invisa, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edmund C. King, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      my
      knowledge:





1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














*/s/
      Edmund C. King*





Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      9,
      2006
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL WASHINGTON.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Airman to swim in 2019 World Military Games

              - Published  Sept. 28, 2019
              -                             By  Airman 1st Class Andrew Kobialka                                                    
              - 366th Fightewr Wing Public Affairs

**MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE, Idaho (AFNS) --  **
The saying goes, “When you aren’t training, someone else is.” So when it comes to being the best at anything, it requires consistent dedication and sacrifice to maintain a competitive advantage. That hard work is starting to pay off for one Airman.The 15 best swimmers in the Department of Defense have earned the opportunity to compete in the swimming component of the 2019 World Military Games. The youngest team member is Airman 1st Class Michael Yoo, 366th Maintenance Squadron avionics backshop technician, from Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho.“I’ve been swimming since I was a kid and kept swimming competitively through college,” Yoo said. “When I heard about the World Military Games, I was immediately interested.”Yoo explained that he talked to his supervisor, 2nd Lt. Brittany Diaz, 366th MXS avionics backshop flight commander, and worked out a plan to reach his goal.“I’m thankful for my supervisor,” Yoo said. “She has supported me throughout this journey and allowed me to make it this far.”With all the support he needed, Yoo dedicated a large portion of his time to training.“Every day I get up at 3 a.m. each morning and drive 50 minutes to Boise to swim in a regulation-sized pool,” Yoo said. “From there I drive back, work, then I'll either swim again or workout in the afternoon.”In June 2019, Yoo received the news that he was selected to be on the U.S. military swim team.“It was a mix of emotions,” Yoo said. “I was excited and nervous at the same time.”Representing the United States is a once in a lifetime opportunity for most people.“To be selected as one of the 15 service members in the entire DoD to compete at the World Military Games is not only a representation of the determination, confidence and diligence that Airman 1st Class Yoo possesses, but a reminder to all Airmen that with these characteristics, there are no boundaries when it comes to your dreams and goals,” Diaz said.The next step for Yoo is to travel to San Diego to meet and train with the rest of the swim team. From there, Yoo and his team will be competing on the world stage in Wuhan, China, this October.Yoo stands as a great example of what all Airmen are capable of accomplishing.“I instilled the lesson into Airman Yoo early on that if you work hard and grow wherever you’re planted, you will do amazing things and that I’ll be cheering him on as it all unfolds,” Diaz said. “It has been an honor to be part of Airman Yoo’s journey and to serve as his commander. Go U.S.A. and go Air Force!”

LRUSAFAFAir ForceMountain Home AFB2019 World Military GamesDODDefense Departmentswimmingsportsathletefitnessavionics backshop technicianACCAir Combat CommandWuhanChina
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AFLCMC personnel recognized at AFCEA International Conference

              - Published  May 29, 2019
              -                             By Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association                                                    

**HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, Mass.(AFNS) --  **
Three Air Force Life Cycle Management Center personnel were award recipients during the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association International Conference held earlier this month in Baltimore.Senior Executive Service member Joe Bradley, director of the Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapons Systems and associate director of Engineering and Technical Management at Hanscom Air Force Base, won an Excellence in Engineering award.Maj. Kate Stow, a command, control, communications, intelligence and networks special program division program manager, received the 2018 Medal of Merit Award. Pat Marr, director of Acquisition Excellence at operating location Hanscom AFB, received the 2018 Meritorious Service Award.Stowe received the award for “demonstrating outstanding dedication to the AFCEA mission and spearheading several endeavors to raise funds supporting current as well as new science, technology, engineering and math initiatives.”“Through her involvement with AFCEA and Hanscom Air Force Base events, Kate Stowe has demonstrated to young Air Force officers, Airmen and government civilians how AFCEA can positively affect professional development,” said Marr, the AFCEA Lexington-Concord chapter president.Stowe has previously received the AFCEA Regional Distinguished Young AFCEAN in 2009, Young AFCEAN Emerging Leader in 2011 and the Meritorious Service Award in 2015.Marr received his award for “incomparable dedication and exceptional record of extraordinary achievement to the Lexington-Concord chapter.”“Over the past five years, Pat Marr has been a true visionary, enthusiastic motivator and exceptional leader who has significantly bolstered our chapter’s success and enhanced our strategic partnerships,” said Pat Dagle, Lexington-Concord chapter chairman of the board.Dagle added that Marr dramatically enhanced chapter membership by 200 and fortified industry and government partnerships within the Hanscom AFB acquisition community.“Over the past five years, Marr was an indispensable chapter proponent spearheading numerous events and raising thousands of dollars to sustain chapter scholarships,” Dagle said.

FSAir Force Life Cycle Management CenterAFLCMCHanscom AFBExcellence in Engineering awardcommand control communications intelligence and networksC3I&NArmed Forces Communications and Electronics AssociationAFCEAMedal of Merit Awardmeritorious service award
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CYRUS HATAMI.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 73 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6147]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO TRACY CROWLEY

  Mr. BUMPERS. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to a member 
of my staff who is leaving Washington to return to her home State of 
Connecticut, Tracy Crowley. Tracy came to Washington 12 years ago to 
work for the Small Business Committee, which at the time was chaired by 
Senator Lowell Weicker. I was fortunate that Tracy remained with the 
committee when I became chairman in 1987. In 1991 she joined my 
personal staff and has been a valuable member of the office for the 
last 4 years.
  Mr. President, those of us fortunate to serve in the Senate are often 
blessed with loyal and dedicated staff that make us look good. However, 
very rarely do we show the gratitude that these staffers deserve. The 
hours are long, the pay, in comparison to the private sector, is not 
very good and the working conditions can be difficult.
  There is no one on my staff that has been more dedicated or worked 
longer and harder than Tracy Crowley. Although she is not a native of 
Arkansas, she treated each and every appropriations project with great 
tenacity, fighting to make sure that the interests of Arkansans were 
preserved. There is not a fish farmer, park superintendent, forest 
ranger or environmentalist in the State of Arkansas that does not owe 
Tracy Crowley a great debt for her work on the annual Interior 
appropriations bills.
  Twelve years is a long time for anybody to work in one place. For a 
congressional staff person, 12 years of service is above and beyond the 
call of duty. Mr. President, while I am sorry Tracy is leaving the 
office, I know that she will have great success in her future endeavors 
and I wish her the best. All of those who have worked with Tracy, and 
those she has so ably served in Arkansas and throughout the Nation, 
will miss Tracy greatly.
  Mr. President, I know that you and the entire body wishes Tracy well.
  

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects Kirtland AFB for AC-130J FTUPublished Nov. 20, 2020
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force selected **Kirtland Air Force Base**, New Mexico as the preferred location for the relocation of the **AC-130J Ghostrider** Formal Training Unit from **Hurlburt Field**, Florida.This action allows for **Air Force Special Operations Command** to realign its training mission under **Air Education and Training Command** and consolidate AC-130 initial and mission qualification training at Kirtland AFB.This realignment includes seven aircraft and 372 positions.The Air Force will complete a required environmental impact analysis before a final decision is made, the start of relocating the Formal Training Unit is expected to begin in the summer of 2022.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Kirtland Air Force Base 



Kirtland AFB 



Hurlburt Field 



AC-130J Ghostrider 



Formal Training Unit 



FTU 



Air Force Special Operations Command 



AFSOC
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2429 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion for 

employer-provided educational assistance to employer payment of interest 

on certain refinanced student loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2014 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance to employer payment of interest on certain refinanced student loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employer Participation 

5 in Refinancing Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2429 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER PAYMENT OF INTER2 EST ON CERTAIN REFINANCED STUDENT 

3 LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 127(c) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (A), by redesig7 nating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C), and by in8 serting after subparagraph (A) the following new subpara9 graph: 

10 ‘‘(B) the payment by an employer, whether 

11 paid to the employee or to a lender, of any in12 debtedness of the employee under a qualified 

13 education refinance loan or any interest relating 

14 to such a loan, and’’. 

15 (b) QUALIFIED EDUCATION REFINANCE LOAN.— 

16 Subsection (c) of section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code 

17 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

18 new paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(8) QUALIFIED EDUCATION REFINANCE

20 LOAN.—The term ‘qualified education refinance 

21 loan’ means any indebtedness used solely to refi22 nance a qualified education loan (within the meaning 

23 of section 221(d)(1)) with respect to which the lend24 er offers the borrower protection in the event of un25 employment or financial hardship (as reasonably deVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:39 Jun 06, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2429.IS S2429

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2429 IS

1 termined by the lender, including periods of forbear2 ance or career assistance).’’. 

3 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT; DENIAL OF DOUBLE

4 BENEFIT.—Paragraph (1) of section 221(e) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before 

6 the period the following: ‘‘, or for which an exclusion is 

7 allowable under section 127 to the taxpayer’s employer by 

8 reason of the payment by such employer of any indebted9 ness on a qualified education loan of the taxpayer’’. 

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to expenses paid after December 

12 31, 2014. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Lunsford *v.*Maida.

[No. 18,917.

Filed March 6, 1957.]

*Sylvan W. Tackitt,*of Bloomington, for appellant.

*George Earl Huntington,*of Bloomington, for appellee.

Bowen, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in *237an action to determine the parentage of a child born out of wedlock.

The appellee has not filed a brief in support of the judgment of the trial court. The rule is well established that the failure of an appellee to file a brief controverting the errors asserted, where the appellant’s brief makes a prima facie showing of reversible error, may be taken as a confession of such errors. This rule has not been established for the benefit of the appellant, but for the protection of the court, and it has been repeatedly held that whether it is invoked is discretionary with the court. *Associates Inv. Co.*v. *Snyder*(1949), 119 Ind. App. 20, 83 N. E. 2d 622; *Miller*v. *Julian*(1904), 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588; *Meadows*v. *Hickman*(1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. 2d 343; *Huffman v*. *Huffman*(1947), 117 Ind. App. 601, 75 N. E. 2d 172; *Whallon*v. *Wood*(1948), 118 Ind. App. 163, 77 N. E. 2d 913; *Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co.*v. *Linder*(1925), 195 Ind. 569, 145 N. E. 885; *Bryant*v. *School Town of Oakland City*(1930), 202 Ind. 254, 171 N. E. 378, 173 N. E. 268; *Reed, Adm’r.*v. *Brown*(1939), 215 Ind. 417, 19 N. E. 2d 1015.

In the instant case, the appellant’s brief sets forth evidence in the record which shows admissions of appellee that he had intercourse with the appellant, and an admission that he could be the father of the child. The matter of the determination of paternity is, in any case, a matter of grave concern to society, and to the life and rights of the infant child.

From an examination of the appellant’s contentions set forth in the briefs, this court is of the opinion that a prima facie showing of error has been made, and this cause is therefore reversed and remanded without prejudice to either party, and with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Note. — Reported in 140 N. E. 2d 762.
News United States Air Force
 Tech Report: New Tech for Boom OperatorsPublished Jan. 24, 2019
                        
                        By : Staff Sgt. Braden Anderson
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                As the new KC-46 Pegasus tanker aircraft comes on line, boom operators will have a whole new way of getting the job done.</iframe

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **KC-46A Pegasus**
- **AF Fact Sheet: KC-46A Pegasus**
- **KC-46 Tanker 'On Cost, On Schedule,' Acting SecAF Says**
- **First KC-46 Assembly Begins**
- **New Tanker Design Finalized Ahead of Schedule**
- **Boeing**
 AFTR Air Force Tech Report technology Air Force Airmen KC-46 boom operator modernizations air-to-air refueling AF KC-46 Pegasus
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 8, 2013

No. 04-13-00014-CV

James E. WALLACE Sr.,

Appellant

v.

Letitia Ann WALLACE,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-10056

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant James E. Wallace 

Sr.

It is so ORDERED on May 8, 2013.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of May, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk