alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Latin American air force cadets tour US, build partnerships throughout the hemispherePublished Nov. 5, 2019
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Angela Ruiz
                        
                        
                        Twelfth Air Force (Air Forces Southern)
                **DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                Future leaders of 11 Latin American Air Forces visited 12th Air Force (Air Forces Southern) on the tail-end of their visit through the United States as part of the Latin American Cadet Initiative, Oct. 30.
The Latin American Cadet Initiative offers the top two cadets from each Latin American air force academy the opportunity to participate in the 3 1/2-week program. The Secretary of the Air Force International Affairs office has been operating this program for the last 13 years.
“These cadets are very likely to become colonels and generals in their Air Forces,” said Toya Brown, Secretary of the Air Force International Affairs country director for the Western Hemisphere. “So if they are able to see and understand now how we operate in the United States Air Force, it makes it that much easier to do those cooperative agreements in the future.”
The 22 cadets represented air forces from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay.
All of the countries that participated except Mexico fall under U.S. Southern Command’s Area of Responsibility. Air Forces Southern is responsible for all U.S. Air Force assets and engagements within U.S. Southern Command.
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base was the last stop for the cadets before returning home. While there, they received a hands-on tour of a HH-60 Pave Hawk and an A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft. They also visited and learned about the missions at the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group, System of Cooperation Among the American Air Forces and Air Forces Southern.
“It’s been an amazing trip. We met people from all around the world, all of the Latin cadets and also from international week at the (U.S. Air Force) Academy, (where) we made very good friends,” said Ivo Santilli, Argentine Air Force cadet. “All the people that we met here we know are going to be future officers in their air force, so it’s good to create these relationships.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



12th Air Force 



Twelfth Air Force 



Air Forces Southern 



Latin American Cadet Initiative 



Latin American air force academy 



U.S. Southern Command 



Davis-Monthan AFB 



Argentina 



Brazil 



Colombia 



Dominican Republic 



Ecuador 



El Salvador 



honduras 



Mexico 



Paraguay 



Peru 



Uruguay 



HH-60 



Pave Hawk 



A-10 



Thunderbolt II 



ACC 



Air Combat Command
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. YUNIS A. SALEH.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Edward Kayhart, executor, &c., of Wilbur Kayhart, deceased, respondent, *v.*Adeline Whitehead et al., appellants.

[Argued December 1st, 1910.

Decided June 19th, 1911.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in *77 N. J. Eq. (7 Buch.) 12.*

*Mr. Harrison P. Lindabury,*for the appellants.

*Mr. Charles A.*Rathbun, for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons statod in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery.

*For affirmance*— The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, -Voorhees, Minturn, Vredenburgh, Congdon — 10.

*For reversal*— None.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

ALICE ANNE PELLEGRINO,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2409 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 130 DB 2017

Attorney Registration No. 67489

(Delaware County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of October, 2017, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint 

Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Alice Anne Pellegrino is 

suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of six months. 

Respondent shall comply with all provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and shall pay the costs 

incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2013.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Stella D. Carlos Salmeron v. Felipe De Jesus Garcia Santacruz

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00087

- CV

Trial court case number: 1117543

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2 of Harris County

On May 7, 2020, this Court issued an order, advising appellant that her brief did not comply
with Rule 38.1. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1. The Court ordered appellant to file an amended brief in
accordance with Rul e 38.1 and advised appellant that if another non

- compliant brief was filed, it
would be treated as if no brief had been filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.9. The amended brief was due to be filed on July 6, 2020. No amended brief was filed.

Accordingly, the Court orders appellant to file an amended brief within 10 days of the
date of this order , or the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1; 42.3.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Peter Kelly

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _ September 10, 2020

____
Exhibit 8.1 

**Subsidiaries of Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.**

The following chart lists each of our subsidiaries which we owned, directly or indirectly, as of December 31, 2014, and April 29, 2015: 

1. Concesionaria Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.P.I. de C.V., a variable capital investment promotion stock corporation organized underthe laws of Mexico 

2. Comercializadora Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

3. Servicios Administrativos Volaris, S.A. de C.V. a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

4. Servicios Corporativos Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico 

5. Servicios Operativos Terrestres Volaris, S.A. de C.V., a variable capital stock corporation organized under the laws of Mexico
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2917 

To expand the program of priority review to encourage treatments for tropical 

diseases. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. BURR, Mr. CASEY, Mr. ISAKSON, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. 

HATCH, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BENNET, Mr. KIRK, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, Mr. SCOTT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. MURPHY, Ms. WARREN, 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

COBURN, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To expand the program of priority review to encourage 

treatments for tropical diseases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adding Ebola to the 

5 FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2917 IS

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITY REVIEW TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS 

2 FOR TROPICAL DISEASES. 

3 Section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

4 Act (21 U.S.C. 360n) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(3)— 

6 (A) by redesignating subparagraph (Q) as 

7 subparagraph (R); 

8 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (P) 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(Q) Filoviruses.’’; and 

11 (C) in subparagraph (R), as so redesig12 nated, by striking ‘‘regulation by’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘order of’’; and 

14 (2) in subsection (b)— 

15 (A) in paragraph (2), by adding ‘‘There is 

16 no limit on the number of times a priority re17 view voucher may be transferred before such 

18 voucher is used.’’ after the period at the end; 

19 and 

20 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘365 

21 days’’ and inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6225]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             CLOTURE MOTION

  Mr. COVERDELL. Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under 
rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

                             Cloture Motion

       We the undersigned Senators in accordance with the 
     provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate 
     do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the pending 
     substitute amendment to H.R. 956, the product liability bill:
         Slade Gorton, Dan Coats, Richard G. Lugar, John Ashcroft, 
           Rod Grams, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Judd Gregg, Strom 
           Thurmond, Jay Rockefeller, Trent Lott, Rick Santorum, 
           Larry E. Craig, Bob Smith, Don Nickles, R.F. Bennett, 
           John McCain, Connie Mack.

  Mr. COVERDELL. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call.
  Mr. COVERDELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRED VARLESE.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied. (See 171 *N.J.Super.*347)
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, John C. Regan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDG Environmental, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report. 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (i) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By         /s/ John C. Regan    John C. Regan   Chief Executive Officer   Date: September 14, 2007
26
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2018, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Craig J. Faggen and Michael
L. Carroll, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |    |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2019 |  |  |  | By |  | /s/ Craig J. Faggen                                        
|                      |  |  |  |    |  | Craig J. Faggen
        
        Chief Executive Officer   
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | By |  | /s/ Michael L. Carroll                                     
|                      |  |  |  |    |  | Michael L. Carroll
        
        Chief Financial Officer
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00514-CR

AARON CHARLES BURTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 351st District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1330899).

TO THE 351ST DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 9th day of April 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on June 6, 2014. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered April 9, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

October 2, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
#### ALAN M. LANDS v. STEPHEN J. BASEMAN.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 200 *N.J.Super.*247)
News United States Air Force
 AFRC plans to stand up new wing at Davis-Monthan AFBPublished Dec. 18, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force is planning to stand up a new wing at **Davis-Monthan Air Force Base**, Arizona, to provide administrative support to 1,300 Reserve personnel working there. These personnel are currently supported by three different command components at **Luke AFB**, Arizona, **Patrick AFB**, Florida, and Tucson Airport, Arizona.Creating a local wing structure at Davis-Monthan AFB will provide unity of command and allow for more efficient and effective support of personnel.
With the establishment of the new wing, the Air Force expects a total of 69 full and part-time positions.
The units in need of local administrative support are:  the 943rd Rescue Group, which conducts day and night combat rescue missions; the 924th Fighter Group, an**A-10 Thunderbolt II** Formal Training Unit; the 610th Command and Control Squadron, which provides communications support to combatant commanders worldwide; and the 720th Security Forces Squadron.The Air Force will now complete the required environmental analysis before a final basing decision is made with personnel beginning to arrive in spring 2021.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFRC 



Davis-Monthan AFB 



Air Force Reserve Command 



local wing structure 



reorg 



reorganization 



readiness 



943rd Rescue Group 



924th Fighter Group 



610th CCS 



720th SFS 



Luke AFB 



Patrick AFB 



Tucson Airport
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of American Business Financial Services, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2000 and the three months then ended and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          68,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,596
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,802
<PP&E>                                          32,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,740
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                       902
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,354
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM:
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         766,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,364,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    175,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,498,000
<PP&E>                                       4,084,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,359,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,225,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,983,000
<BONDS>                                        353,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    444,000
<COMMON>                                       118,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     357,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,225,000
<SALES>                                      4,489,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,489,000
<CGS>                                        3,660,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,660,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>