alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4146

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PETER RIBERHOLT BROCK, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-3-A) Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Riberholt Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald J. Smagala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked “filed” on February 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on February 10, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 & 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Peter Riberholt Brock appeals the district court’s order affirming Brock’s conviction for a violation of the Child Support Recovery Act and sentencing him to sixty days imprisonment and $62,368 in restitution. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 228 (West Supp. 1998).We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion affirming the magistrate judge’s judgment and find no reversible error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 58(g)(2). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brock , No. CR-98-3-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-2 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto
Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my
supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
#### BELTON R. BLAKNEY v. FIRST NATIONAL FIDELITY CORPORATION.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,586
<SECURITIES>                                   912,520
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,058,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (36,353)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,939,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,359
<BONDS>                                      6,060,038
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           703
<OTHER-SE>                                     845,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,939,447
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,181<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,357
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 93,879 OF INTEREST EXPENSE RELATED TO MORTGAGE LOAN ACTIVITIES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
                                  VERITEC INC.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned, Van Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of  Veritec  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  individually,  has  executed  this
Certification  in connection  with the filing with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  of the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB  for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

      The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Certification as of
the 17th day of May, 2004.



                                              /s/    Van Tran
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Van Tran
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer






A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4798-H4799]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               MEDICARE CUTS PAY FOR TAX CUTS FOR WEALTHY

  (Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
   [[Page H4799]] Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO. Mr. Speaker, the Republicans have 
finally unveiled their budget proposal. And as expected, the news is 
not good for our senior citizens.
  House Republicans returned from their party conference last week 
united by a plan to cut Medicare in order to pay for their $345 billion 
tax cut for the wealthiest Americans. Under this proposal, 37 million 
seniors will lose $900 a year while a very lucky 1.1 million 
taxpayers--those making more than $230,000 a year--will enjoy a $20,000 
bonus.
  When President Clinton came to office, the Medicare Trust Fund was 
due to run out of funds in 1999. Through tough actions that this 
administration passed, and every Republican opposed, the trust fund was 
strengthened for an additional 3 years. The President then proposed a 
highly detailed health care reform proposal that would have 
significantly strengthened the Medicare Trust Fund, and again was 
opposed by most Republicans.
  Since last year's election, the President has made clear that he 
still wants to work on Medicare cost issues with the Republicans, but 
that it has to be in the context of real health care reform that 
protects the integrity of the program, expands coverage, and protects 
choice as well as quality and affordability. No responsible person 
should stand by and allow Medicare to be used as a cover to pay for tax 
cuts for the wealthy and, in doing so, break our historic contract with 
the senior citizens.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 44476-0-I.

Division One.

May 8, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Randy John Doick, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-06918-6, Carol A. Schapira, J., entered March 29, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[No. 42446-7-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Raul Martinez Ilerna, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-1-08992-8, James Bryan Street, J., entered March 16, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per. curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6291]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the Senate will 
now proceed to a period of morning business.
  The Democratic leader, or his designee, is recognized to speak for up 
to 20 minutes.
  Under the previous order, the Senator from Wyoming [Mr. Thomas] is 
recognized to speak for up to 20 minutes.
  Under the previous order, the Senator from Michigan [Mr. Levin] is 
recognized to speak for up to 20 minutes.
  Under the previous order, the Senator from Pennsylvania [Mr. 
Santorum] is recognized to speak for up to 10 minutes.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00365-CR

DARREL WAYNE WASHINGTON A/K/A 

DARRELL WAYNE WASHINGTON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-1691-C1

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due on December 9, 2013. On 

motion by the reporter, an extension to file the reporter’s record was granted. The 

reporter has now requested a 60 day extension to file the reporter’s record. 

The reporter’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. The reporter is 

granted a 30 day extension to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s request for a 60 
Washington v. State Page 2

day extension is denied without prejudice of requesting another extension if 

circumstances require.

The reporter’s record due date is extended to June 20, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted in part and denied in part

Order issued and filed June 19, 2014
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

y1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

140888 (87)

DR. SAMMIE E. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140888 COA: 283472 Wayne CC: 04-419599-CZ DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s September 9, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
Exhibit 3.1
 
  Name
  Registered Office and Agent
  Purpose and Business
  Capital Stock
 Classes and Number of Shares




---



##### 



Powers and Rights of Common Stock and Class B Stock
 Voting Rights and Powers
 Dividends and Distributions
 Cash Dividends
  2




---



##### 



Other Dividends and Distributions
 Other Rights
 Transfer of Class B Stock
      3




---



##### 



Pledge of Class B Stock
  4




---



##### 



Certain Definitions
       Non-Permitted Transfers
 Automatic Conversion of Class B Stock
  5




---



##### 



Street or Nominee Registration of Class B Stock
 Conversion of Class B Stock
  6




---



##### 



Issuance of the Class B Stock
 a.
    
    Initial Issuance. The Board of Directors may authorize by resolution the manner
in which shares of the Class B Stock shall initially be issued and may set such terms
and conditions as it deems appropriate or advisable with respect thereto, without any
vote or other action by the stockholders, except as otherwise required by law.
Such initial issuance shall only be to the then holders of the Common Stock.
 Preferred Stock
  7




---



##### 



Issuance of the Common Stock and the Preferred Stock; Subsequent Issuance of Class B
Stock
 Cumulative Voting
 Certificate of Designations of 7.50% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is filed and
attached as Exhibit A.
 Adoption of Bylaws
  Shareholder Amendment of Bylaws
   8




---



##### 



Board of Directors
  Classification of Board of Directors
    9




---



##### 



Vacancies on Board of Directors
  Removal of Directors
  Stockholder Action
   10




---



##### 



Special Stockholder Meetings
  Location of Stockholder Meetings
    Amendments to Articles Fourth through Sixteenth
  Other Amendments
   11




---



##### 



Term of Existence
  Name and Address of Incorporator
  
 Liability of Directors
   WESTWOOD ONE, INC.By:
    /s/ David HillmanName:
    David HillmanTitle:
    Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel State of New York
    
    
    ))
    ss:County of New York
    
    
    )
  /s/ Melissa GarzaMelissa GarzaNotary Public 
  12
CONSENT OF EXPERT






Reference is made to the feasibility study entitled “Feasibility Study and Technical Report Update on the Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” with an effective date of June 19, 2014 (the “Report”).




I, Samuel Richard Fougere, on behalf ofBGC Engineering Inc.(the “Company”), consent to the use of the Company’s name and references to the Report, and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report, in(i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (ii) Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726 and 333-197304) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.




Very truly yours,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,931<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,180
<PP&E>                                          15,433<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,431
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           350<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,951<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,462<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,993<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<FN>
<F1> REFLECTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2> REFLECTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F3> COMPRISED OF COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B STOCK.
<F4> COMPRISED OF NET REVENUES.
<F5> COMPRISED OF OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES EXCLUDING
        DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F6> COMPRISED OF: (A) DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION, AND (B)
        CORPORATE GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force names 19th Security Forces career field manager

              - Published  July 6, 2020
              -                             By Headquarters U.S. Air Force A4S Security Forces                                                    

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **
Chief Master Sgt. Brian L. Lewis has been selected to become the 19th Security Forces career field manager, becoming the top enlisted advisor to the Air Force director of Security Forces.

In this role, Lewis will advise on Security Forces policy, organizing, training, equipping and maintaining mission readiness.

In selecting Lewis, **Brig. Gen. Roy W. Collins**, Security Forces director, said “Chief Lewis has an impressive background and skillset needed in an environment where we are making huge changes in the career field.”

Collins went on to say “I look forward to working with Chief Lewis. His background is perfect for the Defenders we serve.”

Lewis will take over in September. “I’m honored to be selected as the inbound Security Forces career field manager,” Lewis said.

Lewis is clearly prepared for the new assignment.

Prior to assuming his current position, Lewis served as the **Air Force Global Strike Command** Security Forces manager. He served as the command’s primary Security Forces advisor on enlisted issues and interpreted and ensured enforcement of nuclear and nonnuclear policy directives to execute combatant command wartime taskings.

Lewis has held a variety of positions in the Security Forces career field, to include antiterrorism officer, air base defense instructor and major command inspector general inspector.

In addition to his other duties, Lewis will advise on the management and development of all enlisted Security Forces personnel.

“Even though personnel are changing, one thing that will remain constant is our commitment to investing in our Defenders” said Collins. “We must continue to raise our Defenders to a level where they are trained and equipped to be successful. We can only accomplish this level of performance by setting high expectations and investing in them, both personally and professionally.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir Forcesecurity forcesCareer Field Managerdirector of Security Forcesantiterrorism officerair base defense instructormajor command inspector general inspectorHeadquarters U.S. Air Force
Exhibit 32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Veritec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Van Tran, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  ·
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  ·
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  /s/Van Tran
 Van Tran, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: November 3, 2010