alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6301]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                RECOGNIZING BILLINGS, MT, POSTAL SERVICE

  Mr. BAUCUS. Madam President, today I would like to recognize the 
outstanding achievement of the Postal Service in Billings, MT. As is 
the case most of the time, we know how to do it right in Montana.
  Billings' delivery of overnight first-class mail is first in the 
Nation, No. 1. The lucky residents of Billings received their mail 94 
percent on time, the country's highest performance level this year. The 
score also ties for the highest mark achieved by any city since the 
measurement began. In an era when public and private mail volume 
continues to increase, I am proud of the ability of the Billings Postal 
Service to rise above the rest and top the Nation.
  I would like to congratulate and thank everyone involved in the mail 
process in Billings for serving Montana and our Nation with such 
capability.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANN DEL GUIDICE.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond

L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3303

___________

Brad Bigalke, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

State of Minnesota Department of *

Veterans Affairs; and AFSCME * [UNPUBLISHED]

Council 5 AFL-CIO, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: February 8, 2011

Filed: February 11, 2011

___________

Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Brad Bigalke appeals the district court’s1

 final judgment dismissing with

prejudice his claims of Americans With Disabilities Act violations by the State of

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs and breach of the duty of fair

representation by AFSCME Counsel 5, AFL-CIO, and dismissing without prejudice
-2-

his remaining state law claims. Upon careful review, see Gibson v. Weber, 433 F.3d

642, 647 (8th Cir. 2006) (abuse-of-discretion review of decision not to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction); Luney v. SGS Auto. Servs., Inc., 432 F.3d 866, 867 (8th

Cir. 2005) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss), we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
News United States Air Force
 2019 Air Force Photo Contest opens soonPublished April 30, 2019
                        
                        By Debbie Aragon
                        
                        
                        AFIMSC Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Shutterbugs of all ages and experience get ready! The 2019 Air Force Photo Contest opens May 1.
The annual contest, managed by the Air Force Services Activity, highlights and celebrates photography created by Airmen and their families.
This year’s event features five categories:
Adult categories, for those 18 and older at the time of entry: Novice for new photographers and accomplished for those with knowledge based on training or experience, or those who operate as professional photographers.
Youth categories, based on the age of the photographer at the time of submission: Children for ages 6-8, pre-teens for ages 9-12 and teens for ages 13-17.
With a theme of “Life in Motion,” the program managers at AFSVA hope to top last year’s 1,300 entries.
“This year’s theme gives our photographers great opportunity to be creative,” said Darlene Johnson, AFSVA Community Programs Branch chief. “For example, it can be physically moving like running, walking or riding a bike, or it can be emotionally moving, like when an Airman retires or a child is born. Life is one continual motion of moments and we’re excited to see what’s submitted!”
Once the contest is completed, photo experts will evaluate each entry based on impact, creativity and technical characteristics.
The contest, part of the Air Force’s Arts and Crafts program, runs May 1 – 31 and is open to all authorized patrons of Air Force morale, welfare and recreation programs. Photographers can submit up to two original images in JPEG format at http://www.myairforcelife.com/Arts/Photo-Contest.aspx. Images must be between three and eight MB.
Winners will be announced mid-summer with the top three photographers in each category winning prizes.AFIMSC 



AFSVA 



Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center 



Air Force Services Activity 



photo 



contest 



photography 



AF 



Air Force 



LR
**Exhibit 10.2**The following is an excerpt of the Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of CWMMortgage Holdings, Inc. (now known as IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.) held on July 18, 1995.     Director Emeritus Program     [ ... ] RESOLVED, That the position of Director Emeritus shall be created for all retiringDirectors who have attained at least the age of 65, have served as Directors of the Company for atleast five years, and are in good standing (as determined by the Board of Directors) upon andduring retirement. The conditions applicable to any Director Emeritus shall be set forth in anagreement to be executed by the Company and such Director Emeritus, and shall include thefollowing: (i) the Director shall agree that, for such time as he or she is serving asDirector Emeritus, he or she will not compete in any manner with the Company and willrefrain from becoming affiliated with or from supplying any information or materials toany competitor of the Company; and  (ii) the Director shall agree that, for such time as he or she is serving asDirector Emeritus, he or she shall be available to the Company on a consulting basisand shall attend meetings as requested by the Company at mutually convenient times andplaces to advise the Company on various matters.     RESOLVED FURTHER, That the compensation for serving as Director Emeritus will be based on theDirector’s years of service as a Director, and the amount of the Directors’ fees earned during thetwelve month period preceding such Director’s retirement, according to the following schedule:   Years of Service Compensation as Director Emeritus5 years 45% of preceding twelve months’ Directors’ fees10 years 70% of preceding twelve months’ Directors’ fees15 or more years 95% of preceding twelve months’ Directors’ fees     RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Director Emeritus program shall be effective as of July 1, 1995,and any years of service accumulated by a Director prior to such date shall count for purposes ofdetermining the compensation payable according to the schedule set forth above;     RESOLVED FURTHER, That no amount of compensation for a Director Emeritus will be eligible fordeferral under any compensation deferral plan adopted by the Company or any affiliate;     RESOLVED FURTHER, That so long as he or she is in compliance with the terms of any agreementwith the Company, and remains in good standing with the
 

 
Company (as determined by the Board ofDirectors), a Director Emeritus will receive compensation for life, with a death benefit payable tosuch Director’s estate in the maximum amount of one year’s compensation in the event that suchDirector dies before receiving five years’ compensation, provided that the amount of the deathbenefit will be reduced by one-fifth for each year that compensation as a Director Emeritus wasreceived.     [ ... ]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MIGUEL ANGEL MASSAS-ROSA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-933

[June 27, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; James W. McCann, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF002799A.

Miguel Angel Massas-Rosa, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Brockway *v.*Stanton.

A party residing out of the state may be examined as a witness, on a commission, at the instance of the adverse party.

March 17, 1849.

Motion by the defendant, for a commission to examine the plaintiff as a witness; the latter residing in the state of Pennsylvania, more than one hundred miles from this city. It was contended that the code does not authorise such a commission.

Oakley, Ch. J.,

after advising with his associates, decided, that as the code provides for the examination of a party as a witness, and that he may be compelled to testify in the same manner as any other witness, either at the trial, or conditionally or on a commission; there is no doubt that the commission ought to issue in this case.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D529]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action
Bills Introduced: One public bill, H.R. 1527; and two resolutions, H. 
Con. Res. 64 and H. Res. 135, were introduced.
  Pages H4440-41
Reports Filed: Reports were filed as follows:
  H.R. 1139, to amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, 
amended (H. Rept. 104-105);
  H.R. 1361, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for the 
Coast Guard, amended (H. Rept. 104-106);
  H.R. 1141, to amend the Act popularly known as the ``Sikes Act,'' to 
enhance fish and wildlife conservation and natural resources management 
programs, amended (H. Rept. 104-107, Pt. 1);
  H. Res. 136, providing for the consideration of H.R. 655, to 
authorize the hydrogen research, development, and demonstration 
programs of the Department of Energy (H. Rept. 104-108);
  H.R. 541, to reauthorize the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975, 
amended (H. Rept. 104-109, Pt. 1); and
  H.R. 1323, to reduce risk to public safety and the environment 
associated with pipeline transportation of natural gas and hazardous 
liquids, amended (H. Rept. 104-110, Pt. 1).
Page H4440
Speaker Pro Tempore: Read a message from the Speaker wherein he 
designates Representative Waldholtz as Speaker pro tempore for today.
  Page H4435
Recess: House recessed at 12:37 p.m. and reconvened at 2:00 p.m.
  Page H4436
Late Report: Committee on Rules received permission to have until 
midnight tonight to file a report on H.R. 655, Hydrogen Future Act of 
1995.
  Page H4437
Recess: House recessed at 2:11 p.m. and reconvened at 2:19 p.m.
  Page H4437
Quorum Calls--Votes: No quorum calls or votes developed during the 
proceedings of the House today.
Adjournment: Met at 12:30 p.m. and adjourned at 2:20 p.m.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6200]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         TRIBUTE TO NAOMI NOVER

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, on April 22, the Washington journalism 
community lost one of its most enduring figures. For decades, Naomi 
Nover was a distinctive presence on Capitol Hill and at the White 
House, often claiming a front-row seat at Presidential news 
conferences. Known for her perseverance and her determination to 
continue her passion for journalism, Naomi fell ill last month while 
renewing her Senate press credentials. It was the first day for gallery 
members to renew their press cards, and as usual, Naomi was one of the 
first in line.
  A native of Buffalo, NY, she and her husband Barney moved to 
Washington in 1936. After receiving a masters degree from George 
Washington University, she worked with her husband for the Denver Post, 
wrote a column called ``Washington Dateline,'' produced a radio program 
called ``Views and Interviews,'' and when Barney Nover retired from the 
Denver Post in 1971, Naomi cofounded the Nover News Bureau. After her 
husband passed away in 1973, Naomi established a journalism prize in 
his memory, the Barnet Nover Memorial Award, given for journalistic 
excellence at the annual White House Correspondents Association dinner.
  Naomi's perseverance was legendary. Sam Donaldson tells an admiring 
story about the time Naomi was hit by a truck while crossing 
Pennsylvania Avenue. ``The vehicle was almost totalled,'' Donaldson 
says. ``She walked away without a scratch.'' President Clinton called 
her ``years of dedication to her craft and her efforts to cover events 
* * * a lesson to us all in hard work and the persistence of the human 
spirit.''
  Mr. President, I know all my colleagues join me in sending our 
warmest condolences to Naomi's friends and family.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BATTLE
MOUNTAIN GOLD COMPANY QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,500                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,400                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,000                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,800                       0
<PP&E>                                         832,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 549,100                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 457,900                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,600                       0
<BONDS>                                        157,500                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    110,600                       0
<COMMON>                                        13,300                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,100)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   457,900                       0
<SALES>                                        121,700                 107,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,700                 107,200
<CGS>                                          108,300                 101,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,300                 101,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,400                   9,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,500                   7,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,100)                (29,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (100)                 (1,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,000)                (28,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,700)                (31,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)                  (0.14)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-3-1996
<CASH>                                       6,513,399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,185,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (232,376)
<INVENTORY>                                 16,473,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,281,038
<PP&E>                                      31,987,540
<DEPRECIATION>                            (20,099,734)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,015,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,258,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,143
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,429,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,015,796
<SALES>                                     62,461,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,461,159
<CGS>                                       46,805,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,521,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (247,983)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,382,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,166,816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,215,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6768

NATHANIEL R. WEBB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TROOPER HUNDLEY; TROOPER CLAYTON; SERGEANT GARDNER; 

SERGEANT GASKINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03326-BO)

Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: December 28, 2023

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel R. Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6768 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel R. Webb appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint as barred by the statute of limitations and denying his subsequent Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Webb v. Hundley, No. 5:20-ct-03326-

BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2023 & July 19, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6768 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto ReceivablesTrust 2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.

 

Date: March 28, 2013

 

 

By:/s/ Min Sok Randy Park                           

Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: Presidentand Secretary

(senior officerin charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of MariMed Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Jon R. Levine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and result of operations.



|                         | MARIMED
    INC.
|------------------------ | ----------------
|                         | (Registrant)    
|                         |                 
|Date:
    April 29, 2020 | By:             
|                         |                 
|                         |                 
|                         |