alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.28(ii)



 [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and
filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 
  

Exhibit 10.28(ii) 
  

			
		  	 





		
	Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG • 88397 Biberach an der Rise	  	
		
		  	 26 June 2008

	 FibroGen Inc.
 225 Gateway Boulevard

South San Francisco, CA 94080
 U. S. A.
	  	
	  
 Re: Postponement of exercise date for “BI Pharma Option Part
1” granted under the Process Development and Clinical Supply Agreement effective as of November 29, 2007 (the “Definitive Agreement”)
  

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
  

Under the Definitive Agreement FibroGen, Inc. (“FibroGen”) granted to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (“BI”, and
together with FibroGen, the “Parties”) a first option to manufacture and supply [ * ] Product (the “Option”), which must be exercised no later than [ * ].

 
 As described in the Definitive Agreement, the Parties have been engaged in negotiations
for a [ * ] supply agreement (the “Supply Agreement”) which, if BI exercises the Option, shall be finalized no later than [ * ].
  

As the negotiations require further discussion between the Parties, the purpose of this letter agreement (this “Letter Agreement”) is to set forth
the mutual agreement of FibroGen and BI with respect to an extension of the date by which the BI Pharma Option Part 1 as described in the Definitive Agreement must be exercised. Accordingly, FibroGen and BI agree that the Definitive Agreement shall
be amended as follows:
	  	









			
	  
 1. The second sentence of Section 6.1.1 of the Definitive Agreement
shall be amended to read as follows:
	  	
	  
 “Such option must be exercised by BI Pharma no later than [ *
], and such option will lapse if not exercised by BI Pharma by such date.”
	  	
	  
 2. The second sentence of Section 6.2 shall be deleted.
	  	
	  
 Except as expressly set forth in this Letter Agreement, all other terms
and conditions of the Definitive Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Letter Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute together the same document.
	  	
	  
 Please indicate your agreement with the matters set forth herein by
executing this Letter Agreement in the space provided below.
	  	
	  
 Very truly yours,
	  	


							
	  
 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma

            ppa.
	 	  
 GmbH & Co. KG

     i. V.
	  	
	  
 By:
     [ * ]                                
                                   
	 		  	  

[ * ]                      
                                         
              
	  	
	Name: [ * ]	 		  	[ * ]	  	
	Title:   VP Supply Chain	 		  	Corporate Lawyer	  	

 Acknowledged and Agreed: 

FibroGen, Inc. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Thomas B. Neff

	 Name:
	 	Thomas B. Neff
	 Title:
	 	Chairman & CEO

  
 [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in
this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO.	2-01-237-CR

GLENEDITH JEWELL MITCHELL 	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	ON PERMANENT ABATEMENT OF APPEAL

	----------

	We have considered the appellant’s and the State’s motions to permanently abate the appeal due to the death of the appellant.  A copy of the certificate of death states that appellant died on November 2, 2002.

	The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction.  Molitor v. State, 862 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).  Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the permanent abatement of the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2).

	No decision of this court having been delivered prior to the receipt of these motions, the court finds the motions to permanently abate the appeal should be granted.  It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal is permanently abated.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

		DO NOT PUBLISH

		TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

[DELIVERED JANUARY 30, 2003]
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4554-H4555]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HOW NOT TO CUT THE BUDGET

  (Mr. BROWN of Ohio asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, first there was school lunches. 
Republicans voted to cut school lunches to pay for tax cuts for 
American's wealthiest citizens. Then Republicans proposed cuts in 
student loans to pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest special interests. 
Now Republicans want to cut Medicare services. They want to increase 
premiums, and copayments and deductibles.
  Mr. Speaker, I am a deficit hawk. I want to balance the budget. But 
we cannot balance the budget, we should not balance the budget, by 
cutting taxes for the rich, by building star wars, and increasing 
military spending, 
[[Page H4555]] and by cuts in Medicare, in school lunches, and in 
student loans.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6508

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-1)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for correction or modification of the 

record. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 

(E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FS Investment Corporation II (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), Michael C. Forman, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and William Goebel, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 15, 2017



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL C. FORMAN
|Michael C. Forman       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|                        
|/s/    WILLIAM GOEBEL   
|William Goebel          
|Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22876]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

DATES AND TIMES: Tuesday, September 21, 2010, at 10 a.m.; and 
Wednesday, September 22, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Tuesday, September 21, at 10 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Pricing.
    3. Financial Matters.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Wednesday, September 22, at 8:30 a.m. (Closed)--if needed

    Continuation of Tuesday's agenda.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22876 Filed 9-9-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
ex_42.htm


EX.4.2


 


AMENDMENT


TO THE $250,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED October 10, 2014


 


The parties agree that the $250,000 Promissory Note by and between AnythingIT, Inc. and Vista Capital Investments, LLC is hereby amended to replace Section 4 “SECTION 3(A)(9) or 3(A)(10) TRANSACTION” with the following:







(4)           3(A)(10) TRANSACTION.  So long as this Note is outstanding, the Company shall not enter into any transaction or arrangement structured in accordance with, based upon, or related or pursuant to, in whole or in part, Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act (a “3(a)(10) Transaction”). In the event that the Company does enter into, or makes any issuance of Common Stock related to a 3(a)(10) Transaction while this note is outstanding, a liquidated damages charge of 25% of the outstanding principal balance of this Note, but not less than $25,000, will be assessed and will become immediately due and payable to the Holder at its election in the form of cash payment or addition to the balance of this Note.


 

















ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE $250,000 PROMISSORY NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.







Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated October 17, 2014 by signing below:






















/s/ David Bernstein__________                                                                                                /s/ David Clark_____________


David Bernstein                                                                                                David Clark


AnythingIT, Inc.                                                                                                                             Vista Capital Investments, LLC


Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                   Principal
EXHIBIT 34.1





ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Members


Entergy Louisiana, LLC


Jefferson, Louisiana





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 22, 2018
Exhibit 23.1     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   To the Board of Directors ShopEye, Inc.    We hereby consent to the inclusion in this form 10-K, pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of our report dated September 3, 2013 relating to the financial statements of ShopEye, Inc. as of and for the years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012.    /s/ ZBS Group LLP Melville, New York September 3, 2013   115 Broad Hollow Road, Suite 350     Melville, New York 11747 Tel: (516) 394-3344     Fax:  (516) 908-7867 www.zbcpas.com
#### LARRY S. LOIGMAN v. IRWIN I. KIMMELMAN.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5546]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

  At 12:18 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Hays, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has passed 
the following bills, in which it requests the concurrence of the 
Senate:

       H.R. 483. An act to amend title XVIII of the Social 
     Security Act to permit medicare select policies to be offered 
     in all States, and for other purposes;
       H.R. 660. An act to amend the Fair Housing Act to modify 
     the exemption from certain familial status discrimination 
     prohibitions granted to housing for older persons; and
       H.R. 1421. An act to provide that references in the 
     statutes of the United States to any committee or officer of 
     the House of Representatives the name or jurisdiction of 
     which was changed as part of the reorganization of the House 
     of Representatives at the beginning of the One Hundred Fourth 
     Congress shall be treated as referring to the currently 
     applicable committee or officer of the House of 
     Representatives.

  The message also announced that the House agrees to the amendments of 
the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1345) to eliminate budget deficits and 
management inefficiencies in the government of the District of Columbia 
through the establishment of the District of Columbia Financial 
Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority, and for other 
purposes.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6125-S6126]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           NOTICE OF HEARINGS

               COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the 
information of the Senate and the public that a hearing has been 
scheduled before the full Committee on Energy and Natural Resources to 
consider the nominations of Charles William Burton to be a member of 
the Board of Directors of the U.S. Enrichment Corporation, and James J. 
Hoecker to be a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
  The hearing will take place Wednesday, May 10, 1995, at 9:30 a.m. in 
room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC.
  For further information, please call Camille Heninger at (202) 224-
5070.

               committee on energy and natural resources

  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the public 
that a hearing has been scheduled before the Committee on Energy and 
Natural Resources.
  The hearing will take place Wednesday, May 10, 1995, at 2 p.m. in 
room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC.
  The purpose of this hearing is to receive testimony on the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and 
Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Promoting Wholesale 
Competition Through Open-Access Non-discriminatory Transmission 
Services by Public Utilities (Docket No. RM95-8-000), and Recovery 
Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities (Docket 
No. RM94-7-001).
  [[Page S6126]] Those who wish to submit written statements should 
write to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, 
Washington, DC 20510. For further information, please call Judy Brown 
or Howard Useem at (202) 224-6567.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4677]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             MEDICARE CUTS

  (Mr. SANDERS asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. SANDERS. Mr. Speaker, on behalf of 80,000 Vermont senior citizens 
who receive Medicare, I rise today in vehement opposition to the 
proposed 7-year, $400 billion cut in Medicare funding proposed by the 
Republican leadership.
  Today under present funding, many Vermont seniors are hard-pressed to 
pay the high cost of Medicare premiums, and many others cannot afford 
the expensive prescription drugs that they desperately need. Any cuts 
which will raise premiums or cut benefits or raise deductible will 
cause terrible pain for some of the most hard-pressed citizens in 
America and in Vermont.
  It is unconscionable to cut back on Medicare when we are giving huge 
tax breaks to the wealthiest people in this country. It is 
unconscionable to cut back on Medicare when we spend $100 billion a 
year on corporate welfare.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         3016079
<SECURITIES>                                   1011003
<RECEIVABLES>                                   227555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     478495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4753853
<PP&E>                                        20725377
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3034085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22455389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4875022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                   21041599
<COMMON>                                       9743126
<OTHER-SE>                                  (13204358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22455389
<SALES>                                        2872764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2872764
<CGS>                                          2135377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2135377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1110975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1110975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1110975)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
<FN>
<F1>FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, NET LOSS OF $1,110,975, LESS
DIVIDENDS ON THE PREFERRED STOCK OF $741,175, LESS AMORTIZATION OF DISCOUNT ON
THE PREFERRED STOCK OF $809,907, LESS THE PREFERRED STOCK PENALTY OF $4,445,263,
RESULTS IN A NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS OF $7,107,320.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6200]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ORDER OF PROCEDURE

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I say for the benefit of my colleagues and 
others who would probably like to get out of here, we are waiting for 
an amendment to be drafted. It is almost complete. Upon completion, it 
will be sent to the desk. Then there will be a cloture petition filed, 
and we will be able to leave for the day.
  It should not be long. I am told 15 or 20 minutes.

                          ____________________
```