alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Veritec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Van Tran, Chief Executive Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

·        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

·        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ *Van Tran*
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 256

    To amend Public Law 93-435 with respect to the Northern Mariana 
 Islands, providing parity with Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American 
                                 Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

 Mr. Wyden (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) (by request) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend Public Law 93-435 with respect to the Northern Mariana 
 Islands, providing parity with Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American 
                                 Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    (a) In General.--The first section and section 2 of Public Law 93-
435 (48 U.S.C. 1705, 1706) are amended by inserting ``the Commonwealth 
of the Northern Mariana Islands,'' after ``Guam,'' each place it 
appears.
    (b) References to Date of Enactment.--For the purposes of the 
amendment made by subsection (a), each reference in Public Law 93-435 
to the ``date of enactment'' shall be considered to be a reference to 
the date of the enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00083-CR

IN RE RAYMOND CHARLES LIGHTS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Raymond Charles Lights, a prison inmate, seeks a mandamus from this 

Court to compel a trial court judge from Harris County to hear and rule on Lights’s 

petition for writ of habeas corpus, mailed to the Harris County district court in January. 

We have no jurisdiction over Harris County district judges. See TEX. GOV'T CODE 

ANN. § 22.201(k) (West Supp. 2013).

Lights’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
In re Lights Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 3, 2014

Do not publish 

[OT06]
[No. 44917-6-I.

Division One.

March 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Travis Savoy, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-8-00146-1, John M. Darrah, J, entered June 14, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: December 13, 2006
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2017, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Date:  March 22, 2018





Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer





By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:   Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, S. Blair Abernathy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. ("IndyMac Bancorp"), certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IndyMac Bancorp;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | /s/ S.BLAIR ABERNATHYS. Blair Abernathy Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
May 12, 2008

---



QuickLinks
News United States Air Force
 AFGSC begins retirement of B-1 aircraft, paving way for B-21Published Feb. 18, 2021
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                In support of its efforts to modernize America’s bomber fleet, the Air Force will begin divesting 17 **B-1B Lancers** from its current fleet as authorized by the National Defense Authorization Act.
This action will not affect the service’s lethality or any associated maintenance manpower. It will allow officials to focus maintenance and depot-level manpower on the remaining aircraft, increasing readiness and paving the way for the bomber fleet modernization ready to meet future challenges.
“Beginning to retire legacy bombers, to make way for the B-21 Raider, is something we have been working toward for some time,” said **Gen. Timothy Ray**, commander of **Air Force Global Strike Command**. “Due to the wear and tear placed on the B-1 fleet over the past two decades, maintaining these bombers would cost tens of millions of dollars per aircraft to get back to status quo. And that’s just to fix the problems we know about. We’re just accelerating planned retirements.”
The 17 B-1B aircraft will be retired from the current fleet of 62 B-1s, leaving 45 in the active fleet. Of the 17 B-1 aircraft, four will be required to remain in a reclaimable condition that is consistent with Type 2000 recallable storage.
Continuous combat operations over the last 20 years have taken a toll on the airframe’s structure. Currently, a small portion of the B-1Bs are in a state that will require approximately ten to thirty million dollars per aircraft to get back to a status quo fleet in the short term until the B-21 comes online.
“Retiring aircraft with the least amount of usable life allows us to prioritize the health of the fleet and crew training,” Ray said. “Our ability to balance these priorities will make us more capable and lethal overall.”
With fewer aircraft in the B-1 fleet, maintainers will be able to give more time and attention to each aircraft.
“The divestiture of the B-1 is necessary in order for the Air Force to create an even more lethal, agile and sustainable force with a greater competitive edge for tomorrow’s fight,” Ray said.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFGSC 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



modernization 



B-21 



Raider 



B-1B 



Lancer 



NDAA 



National Defense Authorization Act
[No. 44494-8-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Edgar Cleveland, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-04274-5, Michael J. Fox, J., entered April 8, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
News United States Air Force
 AETC cultivates community culture of innovation with new APAN online toolPublished Aug. 4, 2020
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Innovators across Air Education and Training Command now have an online collaboration tool designed to help them discover, learn and promote a culture of innovation.
Airmen are encouraged to check out the AETC Innovation Community on the All Partner Access Network at https://community.apan.org/wg/aetc. The site is designed to connect Airmen in AETC, and across the Air Force, with information and resources about innovation projects happening across the command.
“This truly is exciting and will help all Airmen get after AETC’s priorities of advancing force development and transforming the way Airmen learn,” said Col. William Mamourieh, AETC’s director of analysis and innovation directorate. “With all the amazing things our Airmen are doing to improve mission capability, our goal is to provide a resource that helps them share ideas and lessons learned, connect, and collaborate with others to turn their ideas into innovations."
The tool’s main feature is the AETC Innovation Dashboard, which provides insights into innovation efforts across AETC.
Users will be able to see who is innovating across the command, and to explore innovation activities across AETC, by base or technology,” Mamourieh said. “This allows Airmen who might have questions about a project they are working on, or considering, to find other innovators to collaborate with, potentially avoiding duplication of effort and also saving money in the process.”
The AETC Innovation Community on APAN is available through government or commercial network connections, and a common access card is not required for access.
Airmen’s feedback on this resource can submit via the website, email to the Innovation Advancement Division members at aetc.a9a.workflow.2@us.af.mil, or call 210-652-8413.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Education and Training Command 



AETC 



All Partner Access Network 



APAN 



innovation community 



app 



application 



innovation dashboard
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11151

Conference Calendar

 

MICHAEL JOSEPH FUHRMAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY CROW, Warden, Bridgeport Unit; NFN BROWN,

Major, Bridgeport Unit; NFN DENNY, Captain,

Bridgeport Unit; NFN HART, Chief of Unit Classification,

Bridgeport Unit; NFN COX, Sergeant, Bridgeport Unit;

PATRICIA OUTLAW, Unit Health Administrator, Bridgeport

Unit; JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; GEORGE WACKENHUT,

President and Owner of Wackenhut Security Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CV-742-A

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Joseph Fuhrman, Texas prisoner # 531212, has

appealed the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights

complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(1)

& 1915A(b)(1). Fuhrman contends that the district court erred in
No. 02-11151

-2-

holding that he could not assert his constitutional claims in a

civil rights action. 

Fuhrman contended that he had been detained beyond his

mandatory release date because of the loss of his good time

credits. He demanded an award of monetary damages and immediate

release from confinement. Injunctive relief is not available to

Fuhrman under Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973), and

the claim for damages is premature under Heck v. Humphrey, 512

U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R.

42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the district

court’s dismissal of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)

both count as strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). We

caution Fuhrman that, once he accumulates three strikes, he will

not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action

or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any

facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
USG_EX10.1 9.30.2014 10Q






SECOND AMENDMENT
OF
USG CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


(Effective as of April 1, 2007)




WHEREAS, USG Corporation maintains the USG Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"); and
WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan now is considered desirable;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the amending power reserved to USG Corporation as the "Company" under Section 9 of the Plan, as amended, the Plan be and is further amended, effective September 5, 2012, by adding the new section 5.6 to the Plan immediately following section 5.5 thereof:


"5.6 Domestic Relations Order


     In accordance with Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ii), distributions shall be made to an individual (other than to the participant) pursuant to the terms of a "domestic relations order" (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 414(p)(1)(B)), as determined and administered by the Committee or its delegate, provided, that such order (a) does not require the Plan to provide any type or form of benefit, or any option, not otherwise provided under the Plan, (b) does not require the Plan to provide increased benefits (determined on an actuarial basis), and (c) does not require the payment of benefits to an alternate payee which are required to be paid to another alternate payee under another order."




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to be signed on its behalf by an officer thereunto duly authorized this 5th day of September, 2012.




	
		
	                     USG CORPORATION 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	                                             By:
	/s/Jeffrey P. Rodewald

	 
	Jeffrey P. Rodewald

	 
	Vice President

	 
	Compensation, Benefits and Corporate Services
[No. 43508-6-I.

Division One.

May 1, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Walter John King, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-05167-8, Marsha J. Pechman, J., entered October 12, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR CAMBRIDGE ADVANTAGED PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000771996
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ADVANTAGE PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-25-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                       1,401,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,596,935
<PP&E>                                      87,803,324
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,342,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,820,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,344,332
<BONDS>                                     66,172,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,696,771)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,820,507
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,614,715
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,525,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,415,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,673,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,660,428
<EPS-BASIC>                                        368
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5663]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ORDER OF PROCEDURE

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, for the information of all Senators, 
Members should be aware that there will be two rollcall votes at 
approximately 6 p.m. on Wednesday. Senators interested in speaking on 
any of these issues or other issues related to product liability or 
legal reform should be prepared to speak throughout the day on 
Wednesday.

                 Amendment No. 599 to Amendment No. 596

(Purpose: To restore to rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 
the restrictions on frivolous legal actions that existed prior to 1994)

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I send the Brown amendment to the desk and 
ask for its immediate consideration.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       The Senator from Washington [Mr. Gorton], for Mr. Brown, 
     proposes an amendment numbered 599 to amendment No. 596.

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that reading of 
the amendment be dispensed with.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The amendment is as follows:

       At the appropriate place, insert the following new section:

     SEC.   . REPRESENTATIONS AND SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 11 FEDERAL 
                   RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

       (a) In General.--Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil 
     Procedure is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(3) by striking out ``or, if 
     specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary 
     support after a reasonable opportunity for further 
     investigation or discovery'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
     ``or are well grounded in fact''; and
       (2) in subsection (c)--
       (A) in the first sentence by striking out ``may, subject to 
     the conditions stated below,'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
     ``shall'';
       (B) in paragraph (2) by striking out the first and second 
     sentences and inserting in lieu thereof the following: ``A 
     sanction imposed for violation of this rule may consist of 
     reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred as a 
     result of the violation, directives of a nonmonetary nature, 
     or an order to pay penalty into court or to a party.''; and
       (C) in paragraph (2)(A) by inserting before the period ``, 
     although such sanctions may be awarded against a party's 
     attorneys''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall 
     take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act.
     

                          ____________________
```