alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1593
PATRICIA D. BAKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-822-5-CV-BO) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia D. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baker v. Runyon , No. CA-95-822-5-CV-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5857]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING MAJORITY LEADER

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The acting majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 SAF/IE releases Installation Energy Strategic Plan for energy assurancePublished Jan. 19, 2021
                        
                        By Melissa Tiedeman
                        
                        
                        Air Force Energy
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The assistant secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment, and Energy announced the release of the Installation Energy Strategic Plan. The Plan, which replaces the 2017 Air Force Energy Flight Plan, seeks to better align installation energy efforts with mission needs.
“This plan captures major shifts in the department’s approach to installation energy,” said Mark Correll, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for Environment, Safety, and Infrastructure. “By placing a greater focus on resilience and mission, the strategic plan will create an enterprise that is ultimately more prepared to deliver energy and water when and where it is needed to protect the nation, its values, and its interests.”
The Department of the Air Force is facing an increasingly interconnected world. One with growing threats and unprecedented changes to the operating environment. This plan identifies three goals aimed to enhance mission assurance through energy assurance: Identify Enabling System Vulnerabilities, Improve Resilience Planning, and Ensure Resilience Results.
“When disaster strikes, those who have planned and incorporated end-to-end resilience into their missions will be best positioned for the fight,” Correll said.To view the complete strategic plan, visit**Installation Energy Strategic Plan**.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Installation Energy Strategic Plan 



Energy Assurance 



energy 



water 



Installation Energy 



environment 



safety 



infrastructure 



SAF/IE 



The Plan
[No. 23687-7-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Jerry E. Harris, *Appellant,*and Vicki L. Harris, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 97-2-00800-9, Frederick W Fleming, J., entered May 22, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, A.C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Houghton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,127
<SECURITIES>                                   109,753
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,086
<PP&E>                                         874,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                (324,691)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,445,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,619,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       499,365
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,505,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,445,677
<SALES>                                        916,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               919,527
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,132,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,379,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,379,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,379,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)


</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2750 

To encourage investments in airports through public-private partnerships, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To encourage investments in airports through public-private 

partnerships, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airport Public-Private 

5 Partnership Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTIONS ON NUMBER OF 

7 AIRPORTS IN THE PILOT PROGRAM ON AIR8 PORT PRIVATIZATION. 

9 Section 47134 of title 49, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2750 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, with respect to not 

3 more than 10 airports,’’; and 

4 (2) by striking subsection (d). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4440-H4441]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

  Under clause 5 of rule X and clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and 
resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

           [[Page H4441]] By Mr. YOUNG of Alaska:
       H.R. 1527. A bill to amend the National Forest Ski Area 
     Permit Act of 1986 to clarify the authorities and duties of 
     the Secretary of Agriculture in issuing ski area permits on 
     National Forest System lands and to withdraw lands within ski 
     area permit boundaries from the operation of the mining and 
     mineral leasing laws; to the Committee on Resources, and in 
     addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be 
     subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
     consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
           By Mr. GILCHREST:
       H. Con. Res. 64. Concurrent resolution authorizing the 1995 
     Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the Capitol 
     Grounds; to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
           By Mr. LUCAS (for himself, Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Armey, Mr. 
             Gephardt, Mr. Brewster, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Istook, Mr. 
             Largent, and Mr. Watts of Oklahoma):
       H. Res. 135. Resolution condemning the bombing in Oklahoma 
     City; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
     

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Andersen AFB provides COVID-19 relief to VietnamPublished Aug. 9, 2021
                        
                        By Airman Breanna Gossett
                        
                        
                        36th Wing Public Affairs
                **ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (AFNS) --**
                The 36th Contracting Squadron at **Andersen Air Force Base** recently partnered with the government of Vietnam to help bring **COVID-19** relief by purchasing and sending 77 ultra-low temperature freezers at a total value of $691,000.
The purchase of the freezers fulfills an official request from the government of Vietnam and the Vietnamese Ministry of Health to the U.S. due to their acquisition of 31 million Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines set to arrive in Vietnam by August 30, 2021.
This assistance will provide one unit to each of the 63 provinces in Vietnam and 14 larger units at the national level for COVID-19 vaccine storage.
“This acquisition shows the commitment of the U.S. to the health and safety of Vietnamese by providing humanitarian relief to them during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Staff Sgt. Christian Luevano, 36th Contracting Squadron contracting officer.
A purchase like this usually takes anywhere from 45-120 days to coordinate and process but Luevano and his team worked late nights and weekends to get this contract finalized in just under two weeks.
“The main challenge for the team was the shortened timeline and coordination due to all parties being in different time zones,” Luevano said.
The 36th Contracting Squadron worked closely with partners in Vietnam such as Major Wei Yuan, chief of defense cooperation at the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi. As chief of defense cooperation, Yuan’s role is to identify capability gaps in partner countries then find ways to fill those gaps that would bring mutual benefits to both the U.S. and Vietnam.
“Not only will it enhance Vietnam’s capability to distribute vaccines with special storage requirements, it demonstrates the United States’ commitment on working with partners across the globe to end the devastating public health and economic effects of this pandemic,” Yuan said.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



COVID-19 



Humanitarian 



vaccines 



vaccine storage 



COVID-19 relief efforts 



Vietnam 



Andersen AFB 



Guam 



36th Contracting Squadron 



PACAF 



Pacific Air Forces
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6566, styled State of Texas v. Jason Miears, pending

in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00452-CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Mandamus Proceeding

1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 23, 2010

PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION DENIED

On June 7, 2010, relator Jason Miears filed (1) thirty-nine petitions for writ of mandamus,

(2) one petition for writ of prohibition, and (3) an emergency motion to stay all trial court

proceedings. The court has considered relator’s petitions and motion and is of the opinion that

relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petitions and emergency motion to stay

are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
April 8, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-50998

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

HOMERO BAUTISTA-FAUSTINO
Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-149)

--------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

the sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to remand the case to th e United States District Court for the

Western Distri ct of Texas, Austin Division for resentencing is

granted.

________________

*Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4.IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed

alternative motion to extend time to file the Appellee’s brief

u ntil fourteen (14) days from the Court’s denial of the

Appellee’s motion to vacate and motion to remand is denied as

unnecessary.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

LOUIS MANUEL VALLE,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1310

[April 19, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-

13011CF10A.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. 

Melear, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

Michael Hursey, Esq., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Anon.

On an appeal from chambers, the court decided that on a motion to strike matter out of a pleading'as irrelevant, redundant or frivolous, it would be governed by the consideration whether it was in any way questionable as to the matter being good in point of law. If there were any reasonable doubt as to the *683matter being pertinent, the court should put the party to his demurrer. In respect of matter palpably redundant or frivolous, the court will strike it out of course,

January 26, 1850.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-0812

LT Case No. 2013-CF-6715-A

_____________________________

DETARSHA C. BRADLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

R. Anthony Salem, Judge.

Detarsha Castro Bradley, Miami, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Michael McDermott, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, C.J., and LAMBERT and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects 4,733 in 19E7/master sergeant promotion cycle; list posts May 22Published May 10, 2019
                        
                        By  Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected 4,733 technical sergeants for promotion to master sergeant out of 19,442 eligible for a selection rate of 24.34%.The 19E7/master sergeant promotion list will be available on the Air Force’s Personnel Center website **Enlisted Promotions** page, the Air Force Portal and myPers May 22 at 8 a.m. CST. Airmen will also be able to access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight via the AFPC secure applications page.Those selected for master sergeant will be promoted beginning Aug. 1, according to their promotion sequence number.Commanders will receive notice of their selects from their senior rater's agent starting May 15, with the intent to notify their selects no earlier than one day before the public release.For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.enlisted promotion 



selection 



MSgt 



AFWN 



master sergeant 



promotion cycle 



19E7 



Air Force 



AF 



4 



733 



promotion list 



technical sergeants 



selection rate 



24.34 percent 



sequence number 



senior rater's agent 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



AFPC
[No. 24450-1-II.

Division Two.

April 28, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Bryan Anthony Rash, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 98-1-01325-9, Bryan Edward Chushcoff, J., entered February 22, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, J.; Hunt, A.C.J., dissenting.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PHILIP RIVERS.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Todd B. Fortier, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDG Environmental, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report. 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and; 5. I have disclosed, based upon my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (i) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       By      /s/ Todd B. Fortier                   Todd B. Fortier              Chief Financial OfficerDate: June 14, 2006
23
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            SAVING MEDICARE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Fox] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I rise tonight to give a brief 
review of how this Congress is fighting for our senior citizens across 
the country. First, we rolled back the Social Security tax increase of 
1993. Second, we have raised the income eligibility level above $11,200 
for those under 70. Over the next 5 years, Mr. Speaker, seniors will be 
able to earn income up to $30,000 without ever having a deduction from 
their Social Security. Third, Social Security is off the table, Mr. 
Speaker, when it comes to this budget. And fourth, now House 
Republicans are determined to save Medicare by using new approaches, 
new managements, and new technologies to improve it, preserve it, 
protect it, and eliminate the fraud and abuse.
  The Clinton Administration's Trustees Report on Medicare warns that 
the Medicare trust fund starts to go broke in 1996 and could be 
bankrupt by 2002. The current Government-controlled Health Care Finance 
Administration system has much waste and fraud. The General Accounting 
Office estimates $44 billion a year in Medicare and Medicaid fraud.
  Our legislation will obviously make sure that these changes are made 
so that a strong Medicare system is what we have restored.
  We also want to give senior citizens an incentive to fight waste and 
fraud by paying them 25 percent of any waste or fraud that they find on 
their bills. We want to strengthen and empower our senior citizens.
  Republicans will also increase Medicare spending from $4,700 per 
retiree today to $6,300 per retiree in 2002. That is a 34-percent 
increase in Medicare spending per retiree. There is absolutely no cut 
in Medicare spending.
  We will preserve the current Medicare system for seniors who want it, 
but no one will of course be forced into a system they do not want. We 
will create a series of new choices so senior citizens can control 
their own future, Mr. Speaker. Any good ideas citizens have would be 
appreciated by their Representative on Commerce and Ways and Means 
Committees as they develop a new and improved Medicare system.
  As for me, Mr. Speaker, I will be heading a Medicare preservation 
task force for the purpose of preserving, improving, and protecting our 
Medicare system for our seniors.
  Together we can create a Medicare system that offers the best care at 
the lowest cost with the senior citizens having the greatest control 
over their own health care. We will improve Medicare so it can be 
protected and saved.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES EARL TUTT.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.