alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: 

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# DATE AND TIME: 

11:30 a.m., Thursday, September 9, 2010.

# PLACE: 

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS CONSIDERED: 

The following matter will be considered during the closed meeting:

Consideration of four original jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27 Final recommendation on probationary period for hearing examiner.

# AGENCY CONTACT: 

Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

# DATES:

September 3, 2010.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-22689 Filed 9-8-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Exhibit 31.2

                            FORM 10-QSB CERTIFICATION

         I, Leslie I. Handler, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Encompass
Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ending December 31, 2005;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b. Disclosed in this report any change in Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during Encompass
Holdings, Inc.'s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s internal
control over financial reporting.


May 30, 2006                     ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE I. HANDLER
                                 --------------------------
                                 Leslie I. Handler, President
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
        ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. FKA CST
        Entertainment, Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 10QSB for the period ending
        September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        on the
        date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and
        Principle Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
        knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company. 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
        the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
 
 Dated:
        August 27, 2008
 
 /S/
                  _________________________________Name:
                  Robert MatthewsTitle:
                  Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting
                  Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of CohBar, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | To our knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 10-K”) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|March 31, 2015 |  | By: | /s/ Jon L. Stern                            
|-------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------
|Date           |  |     | Jon L. Stern                                
|               |  |     | Chief Executive Officer                     
|               |  |     | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|               |  |     |                                             
|March 31, 2015 |  | By: | /s/ Jeffrey F. Biunno                       
|Date           |  |     | Jeffrey F. Biunno                           
|               |  |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|               |  |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN J. KELLEHER, DECEASED.

Dec. 10, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Pilot Height, Fitness Tests Suspended and Keesler AFB Basic TrainingPublished May 29, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Trevor Zens
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force highlights the historic SpaceX launch, as two American astronauts launched from U.S. soil for the first time in 10 years. Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi begins basic military training as a secondary location for COVID-19 surge operations, and the Air Force suspends physical fitness testing force-wide. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Trevor Zens)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:













Air Force removes initial height requirement for officer aviators
- Fitness testing suspended until Oct. 1
- Feasibility of secondary Air Force BMT location proven; COVID-19 surge operations to begin June 2Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



PT 



physical fitness 



test 



testing 



BMT 



basic military training 



suspended 



height 



pilot
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARINO LUIS GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 20

- 71497
Agency No. A208

- 825

- 023

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 8, 2021 * *

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Marino Luis Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigr ation Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 71497

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C § 1252. We rev iew de novo claims of due
process violations in immigration proceedings. Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d
532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We also review de novo the legal question of whether a
particular social group is cognizable, except to the extent that defe rence is owed to
the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations. Conde Quevedo

v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241

- 42 (9th Cir. 2020). We review for substantial
evidence the agency’s factual findings. Id. at 1241. We deny the petition for

review.
Luis Garcia’s contentions that the agency violated his right to due process , deprived him of the right to counsel, or otherwise erred in its handling and analysis

of his case fail. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring

error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).
The agency did not err in concluding that Luis Garcia did not establi sh
membership in a cognizable particular social group. See Reyes v. Lynch , 842 F.3d
1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular
group, “[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members

who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and
(3) socially distinct within the society in question’” (quoting Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014)) )

. Thus, Luis Garcia’s asylum and
withholding of removal claims fail.3 20

- 71497

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Luis Garcia failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with
the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Aden v.

Holder , 58 9 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).
The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE, INC.

 

Summary of Director Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Directors of Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (the “Company”) for services as Directors, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Directors.

 

·                  Each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $35,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of our quality of care committee, audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and governance committee receive an additional annual fee of $17,500, $17,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Director receives a grant of 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of stockholders (or, for Directors who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force PEAT lead visits Joint Base Langley-EustisPublished April 5, 2019
                        
                        
                        Air Combat Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va.(AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Physiological Episodes Action team lead visited the NASA Langley Research Center March 28, to discuss the importance of an ongoing pilot breathing assessment with senior Air Combat Command health officials and NASA engineers.
Brig. Gen. Edward Vaughan and his team met at the NASA Engineering and Safety Center to analyze F/A-18 and F-15 liquid-oxygen-configured NASA aircraft to better understand the causes of physiological episodes in the Navy and Air Force.
An unexplained physiological episode may include hypoxia, which is when someone’s bloodstream or tissue does not have enough oxygen supply. This can lead to shortness of breath, disorientation, faintness or fatigue – all of which can be deadly for a pilot.
That’s why the Air Force charged a team of experts to develop a process to measure the pilot respiratory rates, tidal volumes and air compositions that is standardized, systematic and easy to read. Understanding physiological episodes and reducing their frequency is not uniquely an Air Force problem, so the partnership among the Navy, Air Force and NASA is proving beneficial.
“Thanks to NASA's pilot breathing assessment, and their willingness to partner with the Navy and Air Force, we are breaking new ground in the science of manned flight physiology,” Vaughan said. “Our colleagues at NASA prove why ‘rocket scientists’ are so highly regarded in America. They bring an amazing intellectual and experimental capability to the challenge of physiological episodes.”
After his meeting at NASA, Vaughan visited the 1st Fighter Wing’s Aerospace and Operational Physiology Training Flight to see first-hand how physiological training is being accomplished using a reduced oxygen breathing device. These devices simulate the effects of hypoxia for the pilots to gain an appreciation for the mental and physical effects of the episode.LR 



JB Langley-Eustis 



ACC 



Air Combat Command 



Air Force Physiological Episodes Action Team 



AF PEAT 



NASA 



NASA Engineering and Safety Center 



physiological episodes 



hypoxia 



pilot breathing assessment 



AF 



Air Force 



joint base
#### PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. DAVID PRASHKER AND MICHAEL PRASHKER.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 201 *N.J.Super.*553)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D562]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action

  The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held at 
12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 9.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7157]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Mir[oacute]: The Dutch Interiors''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 11, 2010, notice was published on page 48736 of the 
Federal Register (volume 75, number 154) of determination made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibit ''Mir[oacute]: The Dutch 
Interiors.'' The reference notice is corrected to accommodate an 
additional object to be included in the exhibition. Pursuant to the 
authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 
U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign 
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 
22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of 
October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, I hereby determine that the additional object to be included in 
the exhibition ``Mir[oacute]: The Dutch Interiors,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The additional object is imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the additional exhibit object at The 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about October 4, 
2010, until on or about January 17, 2011, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-22358 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40133 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES RAY POLK, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CR-38-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Charles Ray Polk appeals the sentence he received after his case was remanded for resentencing. He contends that the district court erred when it resentenced him because it used U.S.S.G. § 2A1.5, the “murder” guideline, to determine his base offense level. Polk’s challenge to the district court’s application of that guideline is barred by the law-of-the-case doctrine and is beyond the scope of remand. See United States v. Marmolejo , 139 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir. 1998), petition forNo. 98-40133 -2- cert. filed , (U.S. Jul. 20, 1998)(No. 98-5372); Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Traillour Oil Co. , 987 F.2d 1138, 1150 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
No. 11,762.

#### Shafer *v.*Ferguson.

Filed Sept. 23, 1885.

Supreme *Court.—Practice.—Record.—Objections to*Testimony.—The record must set forth the objections to testimony that were stated to the trial court, and only these objections can be urged in the Supreme Court. *Same.—Objections Must be Specifically*Stated.—Objections must be specifically stated, to be available.

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

*A. W. Reynolds, J. II Wallace*and *E. B. Sellers,*for appellant.

*R. Gregory,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The only question argued by the appellant is that arising upon the ruling of the trial court in admitting the testimony of Alexander Conklin.

It is settled that the record must set forth the objections to the testimony that,were stated to the trial court, and that no objection's can be urged here except those stated to the court upon the trial. It is also settled that objections must be specifically stated, or they will be of no avail. *Bottenberg*v. *Nixon,*97 Ind. 106; *Jones*v. *Angell,*95. Ind. 376; *Lake Erie, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Parker,*94 Ind. 91; *Harvey*v. *Huston,*94 Ind. 527; *McClellan*v. *Bond,*92 Ind. 424; *Stanley*v. *Sutherland, 5*4 Ind. 339. The objections stated to the trial court in this cause are not sufficiently specific.

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-30688

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TROY LYNN FORD, also known as White Boy,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:03-CR-10014-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Troy Lynn Ford has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Ford has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-30688 Document: 00512540349 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-30688

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-30688 Document: 00512540349 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHELE CAMERON.

March 29, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification granted.