alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2815 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to require the Secretary of Agriculture 

to extend the term of marketing assistance loans in cases in which 

a purchaser has bought the loan commodity subject to the loan and 

declared bankruptcy prior to paying for the loan commodity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to require the Secretary of Agriculture to extend the term of marketing 

assistance loans in cases in which a purchaser has 

bought the loan commodity subject to the loan and declared bankruptcy prior to paying for the loan commodity. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmer Flexibility Act 

5 of 2014’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2815 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION IN CERTAIN CASES OF BANKRUPTCY. 

2 Section 1203 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

3 U.S.C. 9033) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para7 graph (2), the Secretary’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) EXTENSION IN CERTAIN CASES OF BANK10 RUPTCY.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—This paragraph ap12 plies in any case in which— 

13 ‘‘(i) the producers on a farm have a 

14 marketing assistance loan under section 

15 1201 for a loan commodity; 

16 ‘‘(ii) the producers have sold, trans17 ferred, or delivered the loan commodity 

18 subject to the loan to a purchaser; and 

19 ‘‘(iii) prior to the purchaser paying 

20 the producers full payment for the loan 

21 commodity, a case under any chapter of 

22 title 11, United States Code, has been 

23 commenced in which the purchaser is the 

24 debtor. 

25 ‘‘(B) EXTENSION.—In a case described in 

26 subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall— 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2815 IS

1 ‘‘(i)(I) extend the term of the mar2 keting assistance loan until the date on 

3 which the case under title 11, United 

4 States Code, is closed or dismissed to a 

5 date that is at least 180 days following the 

6 final resolution of the bankruptcy case; 

7 and 

8 ‘‘(II) extend the deadline for repay9 ment of any installment of an ownership, 

10 operating, or emergency loan made under 

11 the Consolidated Farm and Rural Develop12 ment Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 et seq.) until the 

13 date on which the case under title 11, 

14 United States Code, is closed or dismissed 

15 to a date that is at least 180 days fol16 lowing the final resolution of the bank17 ruptcy case; and 

18 ‘‘(ii) if the purchaser has taken pos19 session of the loan commodity, suspend the 

20 accruing of interest during the period of 

21 any extension under clause (i).’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Air Force NC3 Center deactivates as missions realign under AFGSCPublished June 10, 2021
                        
                        By Carla Pampe
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                In 2017, **Air Force Global Strike Command** stood up a new organization here to oversee the Air Force’s nuclear command, control and communications systems - the U.S. Air Force Nuclear Command, Control and Communications Center. After making significant strides to normalize the way in which our service handles NC3, the Air Force NC3 Center was formally deactivated June 4.Over the past four years, center personnel worked to streamline the management of approximately 62 different systems into a codified weapon system. This transition was made possible by the men and women of the NC3 Center, who tackled some daunting tasks across the nuclear enterprise, according to Col. Craig Ramsey, AFNC3 Center commander.“In the last four years, we made a lot of progress across the Air Force that was needed to increase the focus area of NC3,” Ramsey said. “Now it has the attention it deserves across the enterprise, and we’re in a better position for NC3 overall.”Ramsey said the deactivation of the center is a step in normalizing the NC3 weapon system by moving its different mission sets such as bombers, launch control centers, wing command posts, unified command centers, etc., under their respective directorates within AFGSC.“For instance, sustainment and logistics for the NC3 systems will move back under the A4 directorate, which manages the same type of issues for every other weapon system,” Ramsey said. “Planning and programming for the various mission sets will move back to the A5/8 directorate, which manages plans and programs for all things in the command.”During the transfer of roles and responsibilities back to AFGSC, no manpower will be lost.“There will be a net zero change in personnel assigned to the base,” Ramsey said. “We will still have all the people that were doing the work at the NC3 Center; they’re just in a different chain of command.”Ramsey said there has been a very deliberate turnover of roles and responsibilities over the last few months to ensure continuity of mission. He also added he is very proud of the work NC3 Center personnel accomplished over the last several years.“At a time when we really needed it, we were able to provide a one-stop shop for NC3 across the Air Force,” Ramsey said. “That paired us nicely with some of our partners, and gave this mission the focus it needed at a critical time.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFGSC 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



modernization 



innovation 



Accelerate Change or Lose 



Air Force NC3 Center 



NC3 



bombers 



launch control centers 



wing command posts 



unified command centers 



A4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         7,007
<SECURITIES>                                   14,882
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (830)
<INVENTORY>                                    5,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,962
<PP&E>                                         6,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,807)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,267
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       54
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,295
<SALES>                                        26,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,710
<CGS>                                          12,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,724
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,286
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,438
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,438
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.78



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

                               SERVICES AGREEMENT

THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE:

The Company:  "Amber Group Inc" 2360  Corporate  Circle Suite 400,  Henderson NV
8907 ,USA The Marketing service provider: "Strendzers" Marijas 1, Riga, Latvija,
LV-1050

THE MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER WISHES TO DISTRIBUTE THE COMPANY DISCOUNTED
VOUCHERS THROUGH MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK.

TRHE COMPANY AND MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER AGREE TO FOLLOW AND BE BOUND BY
THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

1. COMPENSATION FOR DISTRIBUTING THE VOUCHERS FOR MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER
ACCORDING THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE: The Marketing service provider will retain
Commission which is 10% of proceed of the Vouchers sales. Voucher means
discounted coupons for Company discounted products or services to be offered on
company web site.

2. COMPANY RESPONSIBILITIES: The Company will issue a numbered voucher and
provide it for Marketing service provider. The Company will remit compensation
commission within sixty days after the voucher was used and paid.

3. MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER RESPONSIBILITIES: Marketing service provider will
distribute company vouchers via Marketing service provider network.

4. TERM AND TERMINATION: This Agreement shall continue in effect for the longer
of one (1) year following the Effective Date. Company may terminate this
Agreement at any time for any reason by giving the MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER
notice of such termination. The expiration of the Term shall not in any way
affect the purchaser's usage of the product or service, or Company's obligation
to honor the terms of the sale.

5. The Parties are independent contractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall be
construed to create a joint venture, partnership, franchise, or an agency
relationship between the Parties. Neither Party has the authority, without the
other Party's prior written approval, to bind or commit the other Party in any
way.

This agreement constitutes the whole agreement between the parties and any
alteration must be in writing and signed by both parties. This Agreement (the
"Agreement") is entered into effect this 8th day October 2014


/s/ Vadims Furss
-------------------------------------------
"Amber Group Inc" ("Company")/ VADIMS FURSS

/s/ Gennady Katichev
-------------------------------------------
"Strendzers"  ("Marketing service provider") GENNADY KATICHEV
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      3,222,300 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 487,400 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,834,700       
<PP&E>                                     48,046,100      
<DEPRECIATION>                             15,457,900    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             36,840,100      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,591,700    
<BONDS>                                    35,244,400  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                (1,006,900)       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               36,840,100         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            8,559,500          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,590,200          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              133,700       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,433,200       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,263,300       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,263,300      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                1,263,300 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00 
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E981]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 AN AMENDMENT ADDRESSING THE DEFINITION OF A SMALL BUSINESS IN SECTION 
                                  322

                                 ______

                          HON. SPENCER BACHUS

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. BACHUS. Mr. Speaker, under Chairman Shuster's bill, H.R. 961--
Clean Water Act Amendments of 1995, general and site-specific permits 
are required unless the entity can prove that its activities do not 
pose a significant risk to health and the environment, in which case, a 
permit would be required. However, an exemption is provided for small 
businesses that meet the definition of ``small business'' as 
promulgated by the EPA. Under the provisions of the committee bill, a 
small business is exempt from general and site-specific permits unless 
the State finds that, without permits, stormwater discharges would have 
a significant adverse effect on water quality. In this case, a permit 
would be required regardless of whether the entity was a small business 
or not.
  While the reformed permitting process is a tremendous positive step 
in the right direction, the bill leaves it to the discretion of the EPA 
to define ``small business.'' We fear that EPA will attempt to 
circumvent the clear intent of the bill and define ``small business'' 
so narrowly that it has no practical application.
  The amendment which I plan to offer, a copy of which follows, uses 
similar language from section 507 of the Clean Air Act as it relates to 
defining ``small business'' based on number of employees. Under the 
Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environment Compliance 
Assistance Program, small business is defined as having 100 or fewer 
employees. Our amendment as written would still allow EPA to define 
``small business,'' but any definition would have to include language 
to define ``small business'' as having 100 or fewer employees.
  Even if this amendment is adopted, a State would still maintain 
authority to require permits by certain small businesses if it found 
that the stormwater discharges from the business would have a 
significant adverse effect on water quality. The amendment is intended 
to reduce the cost and paper-work that literally thousands of small 
business would be burdened with if they were not initially excluded 
from the permitting process.
  Amendment to H.R. 961, as Reported Offered by Mr. Bachus of Alabama

       Page 146, line 21, after the period insert the following:
       At a minimum, the term ``small business'' shall include a 
     corporation, partnership, unincorporated business, and sole 
     proprietorship employing 100 or fewer full time employees.
     

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2932

___________ Fred Miller, Jr., * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. American States Insurance Company, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 8, 1999 Filed: April 13, 1999

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jacquelyn O. Brinkley commenced this action claiming that her former employer, American States Insurance Company, wrongfully terminated her employment as a claims adjuster on account of her race and gender. Brinkley committedsuicide, and her husband, Fred Miller, Jr., was substituted as plaintiff.1 The HONORABLE MARY ANN L. MEDLER, United States Magistrate

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was assigned with the consent of the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2- Millernow appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment dismissing the Title VII race discrimination claim. After careful review of the record, we agree with the district court that American States presented evidence of a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for Brinkley’s discharge -- her repeated submission of travel expense reports containing false odometer readings from the personal automobile she used for reimbursable business travel. We further agree with the district court that, although Miller presentedevidence that Brinkley’s false readings reflected mistaken estimates, rather than an attempt to cheat American States, Miller presented no evidence that Brinkley was treated more harshly than similarly situated white employees, and no other evidence that American States’s asserted reason for the termination was a pretext for race discrimination. Finally, like the district court, we are not persuaded that American States’s inability to produce contemporaneous odometer reading records for other employees warranted the denial of summary judgment dismissing this Title VII claim. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kirk Blosch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of OCIS Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of OCIS Corp.

By:       /s/
   -----------------------------
Name: Kirk Blosch
Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN WILLIAMS.

Nov. 13, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4517]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             DON SODERQUIST

  (Mr. HUTCHINSON asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. HUTCHINSON. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased today to recognize a 
personal friend and distinguished businessman from my district, Don 
Soderquist. Don is the chairman of the board of the International Mass 
Retail Association [IMRA], and vice chairman and chief operating 
officer of Wal-Mart Stores, and in both capacities has shown a tireless 
commitment to this country and the principles on which it was built.
  This month, Don is ending his term as chairman of the IMRA, the trade 
association that represents the vibrant mass-retailing industry. Don 
has been involved with discount and mass retailing since 1964, when he 
began his retailing career with Ben Franklin Stores. He joined Wal-Mart 
in 1980 as senior vice president. Throughout his career, he has 
exemplified the work ethic and entrepreneurial spirit.
  Don is characterized by the depth of his personal commitments to his 
family, his church, and his community.
  I ask all my colleagues to join me in saluting Don Soderquist as a 
devoted family man and dedicated business leader. While his leadership 
at IMRA will be missed, we wish him the best of luck at Wal-Mart and in 
his other endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No 333-178388) pertaining to the WPX Energy, Inc. 2011 Incentive Plan and WPX Energy, Inc. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated February 28, 2012, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of WPX Energy, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2011.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|Tulsa, Oklahoma      
|February 28, 2012