alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Aviano's own Olympian

              - Published  Feb. 2, 2022
              -                             By Senior Airman Noah Sudolcan                                                     
              - 31st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**AVIANO AIR BASE, Italy (AFNS) --  **
Pulling five gravities is just a normal part of Airman 1st Class Kelly Curtis’s day. Racing head-first down icy slopes, reaching upwards of 80 mph, Curtis is a member of the USA Skeleton team headed to compete in the 2022 Winter Olympics.Curtis, U.S. Air Force world class athlete, has been performing Skeleton for seven seasons and competing for five. Curtis says her favorite part is getting to include family and friends who have been supportive of her endeavor for years.“The monotony of the day-in/day-out grind with just my teammates might be starting to pay off,” Curtis said. “Now my family and friends can see what it is I actually do in a high-quality broadcast.”Curtis started out as a heptathlete, a combination of seven different track and field events.“During driving school, I saw and slid Skeleton for the first time and was intrigued right away,” Curtis said. “After completing graduate school, I joined the USA Bobsled team for a season before switching to Skeleton full time.”Curtis recently found out the years of hard work paid off, when she received the news that she made the Olympic team.“I couldn’t believe it, I was such a long shot with this being my rookie season on the World Cup level and competing on all foreign tracks, some for my first time,” Curtis said. “I knew everything had to go right in my final race to qualify me; it’s still surreal that it did.”The World Cup usually consists of eight races spread between North America and Europe but was limited to solely Europe this season.“I had to win the final race to be named to my first World Cup team and was able to deliver on the day,” Curtis said.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAviano ABUSAFE-AFAFRICAU.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa2022 Winter OlympicsBeijing
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six month period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 15, 2010By:/s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkChief Executive Officer
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 6, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00651-CR

ANTONIO MENDOZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 04-CR-1155

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of 

a child. The trial court placed him on deferred adjudication community 

supervision for ten (10) years. Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt, 

alleging appellant had violated certain conditions of his community supervision. 

Following a hearing, the trial court found five of the allegations true. The trial 

court adjudicated appellant guilty of the offense and on June 15, 2012, sentenced 

appellant to confinement for five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas 
2

Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. 

One of the allegations the trial court found true was that appellant failed to 

perform his court-ordered community service. In his third issue, appellant claims 

that it was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion to revoke his community 

supervision on this ground because “the trial court failed to consider his substantial 

past efforts to fulfill his obligation and the fact that there was no evidence of his 

willful refusal to perform community service.” However, appellant concedes he 

did not satisfy this requirement of his community supervision.1 

A single violation of a probation condition is sufficient to support the trial 

court’s decision to revoke probation. Moore v. State, 605 S.W.2d 924, 926 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1980). To revoke probation, the State need prove the violation by only 

a preponderance of the evidence. Hacker v. State, 389 S.W.3d 860, 864-65 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2013). The record contains evidence sufficient to create a reasonable 

belief appellant violated a condition of his community supervision. Rodriguez v. 

State, 2 S.W.3d 744, 746 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Appellant’s third 

issue is overruled.

We need not address appellant’s other contentions because one sufficient 

ground for revocation will support the trial court’s judgment. The judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Busby.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 Appellant makes no argument it was impossible for him to perform the courtordered community service.
Order entered October 9 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01068
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF G .D.P., JR., A CHILD On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 30053
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion fo r an extension of time to file her brief on the merits . We GRANT the motion and extend the time to Monday, October 28, 2019 . We caution appellant t hat further extension requests in this accelerated appeal involving the termination of parental rights will be disfavored.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jon W. Howie, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K/A of Chuy’s Holdings, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date: April 28, 2014


/s/ Jon W. HowieJon W. HowieVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
News United States Air Force
 Senior leader announcement: Week of May 16Published May 16, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                **General officer nominations:**

The President has nominated to the Senate the following general officers for appointment to the grade of lieutenant general with assignment as indicated:

Lt. Gen. Gregory M. Guillot 
From: Commander, United States Air Forces Central Command, Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina; Commander, Ninth Air Expeditionary Task Force, Air Combat Command; and Combined Forces Air Component Commander, United States Central Command, Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar  
To: Deputy Commander, United States Central Command, MacDill AFB, Florida

Maj. Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich 
From: Director of Operations, J-3, United States Central Command, MacDill AFB, Florida 
To: Commander, United States Air Forces Central Command, Shaw AFB, SC; Commander, Ninth Air Expeditionary Task Force, Air Combat Command; and Combined Forces Air Component Commander, United States Central Command, Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar

Maj. Gen. Richard G. Moore, Jr. 
From: Director of Programs, Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans and Programs, Headquarters United States Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington 
To: Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans and Programs, Headquarters United States Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington

Maj. Gen. Charles L. Plummer 
From: Deputy Judge Advocate General of the Air Force, Headquarters United States Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington 
To: Judge Advocate General of the Air Force, Headquarters United States Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington

Maj. Gen. Michael J. Schmidt 
From: Program Executive Officer for Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence and Networks, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Air Force Materiel Command, Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts 
To: Director, Joint Strike Fighter Program, Office of the Secretary of Defense, ArlingtonFS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



presidential nomination 



SAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



ACC 



centcom 



AFMC 



Air Combat Command 



Air Force Materiel Command
#### The Thayer Lumber Company v. James Dean.

[See *ante,*4S9.]

*Taxes*— Collection.

This case is ruled by the decision in *Lumber Co, v. Dean, ante,*459.

Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.)

Argued January 11, 1889.

Decided January 25, 1889.

Eeplevin. Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*464
      *Smith, Dims, Hoyt & Erwin,*for appellant.

*George Luton,*for defendant.

Champlin, J.

The facts of this case are the same as those in *Lumber Co. v. Dean, ante,*459.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons stated in that opinion.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,287,393
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      32,890,959
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        33,105,977
<LOANS>                                     52,393,306
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,024,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,127,868
<DEPOSITS>                                  82,501,611
<SHORT-TERM>                                   328,098
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            593,647
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,729,064
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,975,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             107,127,868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,712,871
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,133,076
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,317,319
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,163,266
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,466,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,480,081
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,683,185
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  225,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,357,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,957,676
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,046,816
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,046,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    232,068
<LOANS-PAST>                                   762,095
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               800,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      455
<RECOVERIES>                                         9
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,024,554
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,024,554
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD JOSEPH RYAN.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification granted. (See 171 *N.J.Super.*427)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of BENACO, INC. (the "Company")  on Form 10-K/A for the period  ended  February 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and



2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and   results of operations  of the Company.



Date: August 30, 2012





/s/ Natalia Belykh

__________________________

Natalia Belykh, President,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D515-D516]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
APPROPRIATIONS--ENERGY
Committee on Appropriations: Subcommittee on Interior held hearings on 
proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 1996 for the Department of 
Energy, focusing on energy conservation programs, receiving testimony 
from Christine A. Irvin, Assistant Secretary of Energy for Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
  Subcommittee will meet again tomorrow.
FEDERAL FOREST MANAGEMENT
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Subcommittee on Forests and 
Public Land Management resumed oversight hearings to review Federal 
forest management issues, focusing on the coordination of and conflicts 
between Federal forest management and general environmental statutes, 
receiving testimony [[Page D516]] from Jack Ward Thomas, Chief, and 
Gray Reynolds, Deputy Chief, both of the Forest Service, Department of 
Agriculture; George T. Frampton, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the 
Interior for Fish, Wildlife, and Parks; Rolland Schmitten, Director, 
National Marine Fisheries Service; Dinah Bear, General Counsel, Council 
on Environmental Quality; Robert H. Wayland, III, Director, Office of 
Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Environmental Protection Agency; 
William R. Murray, American Forest and Paper Association, and Mike 
Pieti, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, both of 
Washington, D.C.; Tom Geary, Idaho Farm Bureau Federation, Burley, on 
behalf of the American Farm Bureau Federation; Nathaniel Lawrence, 
Natural Resources Defense Council, San Francisco, California; Douglas 
L. Honnold, Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc., Bozeman, Montana; 
Glen Spain, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, 
Eugene, Oregon; Olivia Falconer James, The River Company, Sun Valley, 
Idaho; Sue Kupillas, Jackson County, Oregon; and Jerry Rust, Lane 
County, Oregon.
  Hearings were recessed subject to call.
CHILD WELFARE SYSTEM
Committee on Finance: Committee held hearings on the implementation of 
the Child Welfare and Adoption Assistance Act (P.L. 96-272), and 
related provisions of H.R. 4, Personal Responsibility Act of 1995, 
receiving testimony from Peter M. DiBari, Child and Family Services of 
Newport County, Newport, Rhode Island; Peter Digre, Los Angeles County 
Department of Children and Family Services, Los Angeles, California; 
Wade F. Horn, National Fatherhood Initiative, Gaithersburg, Maryland; 
and Ernestine Moore, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  Committee will meet again tomorrow.
NOMINATION
Select Committee on Intelligence: Committee concluded hearings, in open 
and closed session, on the nomination of John M. Deutch, of 
Massachusetts, to be Director of Central Intelligence, after the 
nominee, who was introduced by Senators Domenici, Kerry, and Kennedy, 
testified and answered questions in his own behalf.
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  September-30-1997
<CASH>                        8,170,202
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,031,844
<ALLOWANCES>                  193,274
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        41,985,737
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                54,915,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,598,317
<BONDS>                       51,000,000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    2,693,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  54,915,170
<SALES>                       000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              9,788,779
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,501,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,081,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3,063,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           000
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  1,889,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 408.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                 408.96
        

</TABLE>
[No. 43021-1-I.

Division One.

April 24, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John David Leesburg, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-8-02064-6, Carlos Y. Velategui, J. Pro Tern., entered June 23, 1998. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 99.1



GARRISON CAPITAL INC.



PRIVACY POLICY



To Garrison Capital Investors:



We take precautions to maintain the privacy
of personal information concerning our investors. These precautions include the adoption of certain procedures designed to maintain
and secure your nonpublic personal information from inappropriate disclosure to unaffiliated third parties. We are sending this
notice in accordance with applicable federal regulations. This notice applies to investors in Garrison Capital LLC (together with
any successor thereto, including Garrison Capital Inc., “we” or the “ Company ”).



What kind of personal information do we have about you
and where did we get it?



We collect nonpublic personal information
about you from the following sources:



| | · | Information we may receive from you in subscription agreements or other related documents or forms; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Information about your transactions with our affiliates and us.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------



How do we protect your personal information?



We do not disclose any nonpublic personal
information about our investors or former investors to anyone, except as required or permitted by law.



We restrict access to nonpublic personal
information about you to those employees and agents of Garrison Capital Advisers LLC its affiliates and unaffiliated third party
service providers (which may include a custodian, transfer agent or financial printer) who need to know that information in order
to provide services to you or to the Company. In that regard, we note that we maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards
that comply with federal standards to safeguard your nonpublic personal information and which we believe is adequate to prevent
unauthorized disclosure of such information.



What do we do with personal information about our former
investors?



If an investor decides to no longer do business
with us, we will continue to follow this privacy policy with respect to the information we have in our possession about such investor
and his/her account.



If you have any questions concerning our
privacy policies, please contact our Chief Financial Officer, Brian Chase, at (212) 372-9500.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4794]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED

  By unanimous consent, permission to address the House, following the 
legislative program and any special orders heretofore entered, was 
granted to:
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Pallone) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Owens, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Becerra, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. DeFazio, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, for 5 minutes, today.
  Ms. Jackson-Lee, for 5 minutes, today.
  Ms. Kaptur, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Reed, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Pallone, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Rahall, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Menendez, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Hilliard, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Hayworth) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mrs. Seastrand, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Hunter, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, for 5 minutes, today.
  Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, for 5 minutes, on May 17.
  Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania, for 5 minutes, today.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Veritec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Van Tran, Chief
Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




·
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




·
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









/s/Van
Tran




Van Tran,
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board




Date:
February 19, 2010
#### JOHN S. VIEHE v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.