alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4674]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        WASHINGTON PHILANTHROPY

  (Ms. PRYCE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. PRYCE. Mr. Speaker, in the early 1990's, a study was completed by 
political scientist James L. Payne. Mr. Payne tabulated the witnesses 
who appeared before congressional hearings. The findings are 
astonishing. He found that 95.7 percent of those who appeared came to 
urge more spending. Only 0.7 percent came to urge against more 
spending.
  Washington has created a culture of spending. People come to 
Washington, perhaps with good intentions, and are sucked into this 
philanthropic swirl, where problems somehow go away if more tax dollars 
are spent.
  Well, the game is up. Last November, the American people said 
``enough'' and put Republicans in charge of Congress to put an end to 
the 40-year-long philanthropic tendencies of our friends on the other 
side.
  If spending tax money truly solves problems, America would be the 
most trouble free society in the world. But we're not. Today, America 
is facing a $4 trillion national debt in the face of some of the worst 
societal conditions we have ever witnessed. It's time to break 
Washington's spending culture. Philanthropy is a wonderful thing, but 
not with tax dollars.

                          ____________________
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air University Press soliciting for DoD, DAF Arctic Strategy journal articles

              - Published  April 13, 2021
              -                             By Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs                                                    

**MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS)  --  **
In support of the Department of Defense and Department of the Air Force’s Arctic Strategy, Air University Press is soliciting journal articles to support the growing national security interests and requirements for operating in the Arctic region.Products could be historical cases with applied lessons for the future, lessons-learned from ongoing initiatives, or suggestions for future constructs. Length may vary and specific submission requirements can be found on the **Air and Space Power Journal** and **Strategic Studies Quarterly**webpages.Any questions or proposals for larger projects may be submitted to the Director, Air University Press via email at **AirUniversityPress@au.af.edu**.The DoD’s desired end-state for the Arctic is a secure and stable region in which U.S. national security interests are safeguarded, the U.S. homeland is defended, and nations work cooperatively to address shared challenges. For more information on the DoD’s Arctic Strategy, click **here**.The DAF Arctic Strategy fully supports the 2018 National Defense Strategy and implements the 2019 DoD Arctic Strategy embracing the DoD’s desired Arctic end-state and outlines the department's unique role and optimizes Air Force and Space Force capabilities for the region. For more information on the Air Force’s Arctic Strategy, click **here**.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAETCAir Education and Training CommandAUAir UniversityArctic Strategyjournalarticle
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., September 9, 2010.

# PLACE:

5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:

1. Approval of Minutes May 6, 2010 Quarterly Business Meeting.

2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners and Section Administrators.

3. Consideration of proposed rule regarding rating of crack cocaine offenses.

4. Conditions for sex offenders.

# AGENCY CONTACT:

Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

Dated: September 3, 2010.

Rockne J. Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-22690 Filed 9-8-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
#### STATE v. SARTORI

No. 215P01

Case below: 142 N.C. App. 523

Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 June 2001.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2015

p1019 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2015

148809

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148809

COA: 319277

Muskegon CC: 12

- 062535

- FH

DETRICK ANTIONE WILLIAMS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 29, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v

Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on

July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questio ns presented should be reviewed

by this Court.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30039

Conference Calendar

__________________

DANNY McCRAY MATHERLY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DONNIE R. SEAL AND ED C. DAY,

 Defendants,

DONNIE SEAL,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

____________________

No. 95-30040

Conference Calendar

____________________

DANNY McCRAY MATHERLY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DONNIE R. SEAL AND ED C. DAY,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-1168 F

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
Nos. 95-30039 & 95-30040

-2-

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

Danny M. Matherly, a prisoner in the Washington Correctional

Institute, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that

prison guard Donnie R. Seal searched Matherly's foot locker and

rifled his files. The dismissal of this suit is the subject of

case number 95-30039. The parties agreed to proceed before a

magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The district court's

findings of fact are reviewed for clear error; matters of law are

reviewed de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 52; Valencia v. Wiggins,

981 F.2d 1440, 1449 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 2998

(1993). 

The district court was correct in concluding that Matherly

has no Fourth Amendment protection against an unreasonable search

of his prison cell. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 526 (1984). 

Matherly did not specifically allege that anything had been

removed from the files or that the inspection of the files had

hampered his legal activities. As such, Matherly has failed to

state "a cognizable constitutional claim either for a denial of

access to the courts or for denial of [his] right to free speech

by alleging that [his] . . . legal mail was opened and inspected

for contraband outside [his] presence." Brewer v. Wilkinson, 3

F.3d 816, 825 (5th Cir. 1993) (case addressed incoming legal

mail), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1081 (1994). 

The district court's denial of his motion to proceed on IFP

is the subject of Matherly's appeal in case number 95-30040. The
Nos. 95-30039 & 95-30040

-3-

district court was correct in denying IFP as moot because

Matherly had already been granted IFP status. 

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HENRY F. SMITH, JR.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force releases staff sergeant/21E5 promotion cycle statisticsPublished Aug. 24, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kiana Pearson
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Department of the Air Force officials selected 15,660 Air Force senior airmen for promotion to staff sergeant out of 44,663 eligible for a selection rate of 35.06% in the 21E5 promotion cycle, which includes supplemental promotion opportunities.
The average overall score for those selected was 345.35. Selectees’ average time in grade was 1.73 years and time in service was 4.24 years
The staff sergeant promotion list is available on the **Enlisted Promotions** page of the Air Force’s Personnel Center website, the Air Force Portal and myPers. Members can access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight via the AFPC secure applications page.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force Personnel Center 



staff sergeant 



SSgt 



enlisted 



promotion 



statistics
November 18 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AZUBUINE ESIABA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00357

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______ _________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this de cision certified below for observance.
News United States Air Force
 Total Force Integration team assesses Joint Base San Antonio-RandolphPublished Feb. 10, 2020
                        
                        By Sabrina Fine
                        
                        
                        502nd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force active-duty, Reserve and Air National Guard members all wear the same uniform, salute the same flag and support the same mission. Improving this collaboration is the Total Force Integration team. TFI officials visited Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph to learn from the successes and improve the challenges of JB San Antonio-Randolph Airmen Feb. 4-6. “We're here...to understand the unique organization with training units, the Reserve and the active-duty flying training squadrons, and how they interact and provide combat-ready pilots for the Air Force in a TFI structure,” said Brig. Gen. Thomas Grabowski, Air National Guard special assistant to the director for Total Force Integration. The TFI directorate, under Headquarters Air Force, was congressionally mandated in 2014 to integrate active duty, Reserve and Air National Guard and assess association effectiveness, conduct analysis and better connect the Air Force. “We want to improve total force integration through our lines of effort by driving the policy and resourcing changes necessary to really break those barriers to integration,” said Col. Robin Bowman, TFI director. Through focus groups, data collection and meetings with leadership, TFI collects information on total force associations. Associations are agreements between two or more organizations that share resources and perform a common mission. “We are truly here as facilitators, to explore and gather the data that works and doesn't work so that information can be shared abroad,” said Brig. Gen. Scheid Hodges, Air Force Reserve Command special assistant to commander for Total Force Integration. Since the base plays a critical role in the training and development of Airmen, which resonates throughout their whole career, assessing how JB San Antonio-Randolph functions as an association is valuable to TFI. “Right now, JBSA-Randolph is trailblazing for what total force is going to look like in the future,” Grabowski said. “We're excited about being here for the next couple of days to learn from total force partners and figure out what we can do to bottle the magic that happens here at Randolph, and replicate that in other areas of the Air Force portfolio.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Joint Base San Antonio Randolph 



JBSA 



Air Education Command 



AETC 



Air National Guard 



ANG 



Total Force Integration 



TFI 



502nd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

March 3, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50630 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURICIO JOE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-94-CR-73-ALL)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mauricio Joe Hernandez appeals the 24-month sentence imposed

upon revocation of supervised release, which stemmed from his 1994

conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. (The

revocation was based upon Hernandez’ drug use and withdrawal from

a drug treatment facility against the advice of the staff.)

Hernandez contends that the district court violated F E D

. R. C RI M

.

P. 32(i)(3)(B) by failing to resolve a contested issue at

sentencing: whether Hernandez would be eligible for intensive drug2

treatment in prison in the light of his former gang affiliation,

which could require his segregation f rom the regular prison

population.

The parties dispute: whether F E D

. R. C RIM

. P. 32 required the

district court to make a finding on the availability of drug

treatment; and whether Hernandez preserved this issue by objecting

at sentencing. We need not resolve these contentions; even

deciding them in the light most favorable to Hernandez, the

sentence was proper. The sentencing transcript reflects that the

district court implicitly determined that t his issue would not

affect sentencing. Hernandez has not demonstrated that the court

imposed a sentence in violation of law or that the sentence was

plainly unreasonable. S ee United States v. Stiefel
, 207 F.3d 256,

259 (5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11102

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE HERNANDEZ-JASSO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-67-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Hernandez-Jasso appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1). He argues that he was charged with and pleaded

guilty to simple reentry under § 1326(a) but that he was

sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a

felony conviction pursuant to § 1326(b)(1). His argument is

foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. VasquezOlvera, 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).
No. 

-2-

AFFIRMED.
#### WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 97-70033 to 97-70035.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 10, 1998.

Decided July 28, 1998.

Charles P. Duffy, Philip N. Jones, and Peter J. Duffy, Duffy, Kekel, Jones & Bernard, Portland, Oregon, for petitioner-appellant.

Loretta C. Argett, Richard Farber, and John A. Dudeck, Jr., United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee.

Before: ALARCON, FERGUSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Commissioner determined deficiencies in income taxes for Willamette Industries, Inc. (“Willamette”) for the years 1978-1983. Willamette challenges the tax court’s rulings on two separate issues in connection with these deficiencies: (1) whether, for purposes of 26 U.S.C. § 631(a)1, the fair market value of timber logged by Willamette and its subsidiaries on United States Forest Service lands includes the price of building the logging roads required by the Forest Service as part of its contract; and (2) whether Willamette properly deducted $20 million pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 461(f) on its 1981 tax return because it procured an unsecured letter of credit in that amount for purposes of satisfying its estimated liability in an anti-trust class action lawsuit.

Both issues were originally assigned to Special Trial Judge Vandervort for trial and were subsequently reassigned to Special Trial Judge Powell for a decision. On May 23, 1989, Tax Court Judge Scott entered an opinion adopting Special Trial Judge Powell’s opinion on the contested liability issue. *See Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner,*92 T.C. 1116, 1989 WL 53301 (1989). This *1058opinion held that Willamette could not deduct the contested liability because the letter of credit was not a transfer of money or property within the meaning of Section 461(f)(2).

On July 16, 1992, Tax Court Judge Dren-nen issued a memorandum opinion on the fair market value issue adopting Special Trial Judge Powell’s opinion on the issue. *See Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner,*64 T.C.M. (CCH) 202 (1992). The tax court held that road construction costs were not to be taken into account in determining the fair market value of timber under Section 631(a). The tax court relied on a previous opinion on a previous case litigated by Willamette regarding tax years 1974-77. *See Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner,*54 T.C.M. (CCH) 616, 628-29 (1987), *supplemented by,*60 T.C.M. (CCH) 48, 51-52, 1990 WL 91249 (1990), *supplemented further by,*62 T.C.M. (CCH) 451, 452-58, 1991 WL 151413 (1991).

We determine that the tax court’s decisions on both the fair market value and contested liability issues are correct and are therefore affirmed.

1

. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Van Ovost Nomination, CJADC2 Demo, and PT Test ChangesPublished March 12, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force highlights the nomination of Gen. Jacqueline Van Ovost to be commander of U.S. Transportation Command, a CJADC2 demonstration with USAFE, joint, and allied partners, and a new start date for updated PT tests. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Eric Mann)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Gen. Van Ovost nominated to lead USTRANSCOM****- CJADC2 demonstration with USAFE, joint and allied partners****- A new start date for updated PT tests**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



CJADC2 



Command and Control 



PT tests 



fitness assessments 



Jacqueline Van Ovost 



US Transportation Command
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

(Date)                          December 15, 2003


BY(Signature)                   /s/ Peter Porath
(Name and Title)                Peter Porath
                                President, Chief Executive Officer