alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IVAX
     CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997,
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                         74,812
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 207,912<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                   271,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              690,427
<PP&E>                                                        423,538<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              1,338,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         217,177
<BONDS>                                                       411,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       12,148
<OTHER-SE>                                                    665,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,338,433
<SALES>                                                       284,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              284,550
<CGS>                                                         182,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 182,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              110,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                3,234
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              7,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (9,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (3,221)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (7,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (7,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0<F3>
<FN>
<F1> AMOUNT SHOWN IS NET OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2> AMOUNT SHOWN IS NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F3> AMOUNT IS ANTIDILUTIVE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as AdoptedPursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onMay 3, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, James P. Santelli, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Periodic Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 3, 2006 | /s/ JAMES P. SANTELLI     |
|--------------------|---------------------------|
|               | James P. Santelli         |
|               | Chief Financial Officer   |
|               | Digital Angel Corporation |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


       Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906
            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Income Properties,
Ltd - Series XI (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of Douglas Crocker, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the General Partner of the
Partnership (the "General Partner"), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice President -
Finance of the General Partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Douglas Crocker
------------------------
Douglas Crocker
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002


/s/ Philip Tinkler
------------------------
Philip Tinkler
Vice President - Finance
August 12, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MSO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, for the period ending June 30, 2006 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1)            The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas M. Mason    Thomas
M. Mason    Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 14, 2006
#### THOMAS REGIONO v. ADAMS, HOPKINS & ASSOCIATES.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See — *N.J.Super.*—)
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases “Red Tailed Angels” docuseriesPublished Nov. 11, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jeremy L. Mosier
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                In commemoration of the 75th anniversary of World War II, the U.S. Air Force video production team produced a video series to highlight the Tuskegee Airmen and their impact on the war, and society as a whole.
“The Red Tailed Angels” documentary series showcases the hardships, struggles and ultimately the successes of the Tuskegee Airmen.
“The Tuskegee Airmen represent a part of American history, which for far too many years languished in obscurity after WWII,” said Anthony Young, Air Force Television senior producer. “This documentary is an attempt to tell their story through the words of those who lived it, highlighting not only the obstacles they faced, but the perseverance they exhibited in overcoming it. Though they have been revered for their exploits during the war, I think their legacy is evident not only throughout the U.S. armed forces, but within society as a whole, given the many doors their success has led to the opening of.”
The first of the three-part series is available on the Air Force Blue Tube Channel at **www.youtube.com/c/AFBlueTube**. The second and third segments will soon follow.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



docuseries 



Red Tailed Angels 



World War II 



Air Force Television 



Tuskegee Airmen
News United States Air Force
 Tyndall AFB selected to host three F-35 squadronsPublished March 30, 2021
                        
                        By 325th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                        
                        
                        325th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                A Record of Decision was issued by the U.S. Air Force making **Tyndall Air Force Base** the official location to host three new squadrons of the **F-35A Lightning II**.
Air Force officials selected Tyndall AFB based on numerous attributes, including infrastructure capability, quality of life for Airmen, and airspace. The selection process included a thorough environmental impact analysis, in accordance with the **National Environmental Policy Act**.
The decision followed a **2018 proposal** by the Air Force to base F-35s at Tyndall AFB after extensive damage from Hurricane Michael prompted the base’s redesign to become the Department of Defense’s first **Installation of the Future**. This has allowed the Air Force to rebuild the base to accommodate the unique needs of the F-35A.
"Adding F-35 squadrons at Tyndall (AFB) ensures Airmen will continue to have a strategic advantage as the **325th Fighter Wing** enhances fighter training and combat readiness,” said **Col. Greg Moseley**, 325th FW commander.
The **F-35**s will be delivered to three fighter squadrons in multiple phases, with the first aircraft planned to arrive in September 2023. Each of the squadrons will have 24 Joint Strike Fighters assigned; totaling 72 aircraft assigned to Tyndall AFB’s 325th FW once full mission capability is achieved.
The installation adjoins the Gulf Range Complex, comprising 130,000 square miles of training airspace over the Gulf of Mexico, and is one of the few ranges in the U.S. capable of supporting large-scale air combat training. Direct access to this range is essential for fifth-generation fighter readiness and for live-fire testing and training.
“The airspace surrounding Tyndall (AFB) is a national treasure,” Moseley said. “The type of training conducted here integrates the DoD’s most advanced aircraft and builds a dynamic force.”
As threats evolve and change around the world, the 325th FW and **Air Combat Command** must train daily to deter and defend against any threat.
“Air dominance is critical to the **National Defense Strategy** and basing F-35s at Tyndall (AFB) will only further our service’s air superiority goals for 2030 and beyond,” Moseley said.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Record of Decision 



Tyndall AFB 



F-35 A 



Lightning II 



Installation of the Future 



Aircraft 



air dominance 



NDS 



ACC 



Air Combat Command 



Gulf Range Complex 



fifth-generation 



fighter 



new squadrons
1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Ch ief United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3667

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Christopher Randal Manning, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 9, 2008 Filed: July 11, 2008

___________ Before MELLOY, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges

___________ PER CURIAM. Christopher Randal Manning, having previ ously been sentenced for violating supervised release, stipulated to a second vi olation of supervised release. The district court 1 revoked his supervised release and imposed the maximum sentence of 24 months imprisonment, under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Manning appeals, asserting procedural unreasonableness. Having juri sdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This court reviews for abuse of di scretion a sentence within the bounds of section 3583(e)(3). United States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008).-2- This court reviews procedural sentencing errors for plain error when, as here, the defendant fails to object inthe district court. See United States v. Burnette , 518 F.3d 942, 946 (8th Cir. 2008), petition for cert. filed (U.S. June 4, 2008) (No. 07-11317). Manning argues the district court did not adequately consider and articulate the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and Chapter 7 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. A sentence is procedurally unreasonable if the court fails to consider the § 3553(a) factors or fails to adequately explain the chosen sentence. Gall v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). The district court does not have to make specific findings, and all that is normally required is evidence that the c ourt was aware of the relevant § 3553(a) factors. Perkins , 526 F.3d at 1110

. The court is not required to categorically rehearse each § 3553(a) factor as long as they wereclearly considered. United States v. Austad , 519 F.3d 431, 436 (8th Cir. 2008).
Here, the record reveals the court’s awar eness of the relevant § 3553(a) factors. The court was familiar with Manning’s hist ory, characteristics, and conduct because it imposed Manning’s initial sentence fo r bank fraud and revoke d his supervised release for the first violation. See Perkins , 526 F.3d at 1111. Further, Manning’s counsel informed the court that the “Chapter 7 range is twelve to eighteen months” while the government recommended the maximum of 24 months. See United States v. Franklin , 397 F.3d 604, 607 (8th Cir. 2005) (findi ng sufficient consideration of the Chapter 7 policy statements where “the di strict court was made aware of both the suggested range under Chapter 7 of the Guidelines and the statutory maximum sentence” through counsel’s arguments). Th e court concluded “g iven the conduct of this defendant, that an extreme sentence w ould be appropriate.” The court adequately explained the chosen sentence. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JULIUS D. BOWDEN.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2908 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand eligibility for the 

refundable credit for coverage under a qualified health plan, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

eligibility for the refundable credit for coverage under 

a qualified health plan, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Affordable Health In5 surance for the Middle Class Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2908 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING ELIGIBILITY FOR REFUNDABLE CRED2 IT FOR COVERAGE UNDER A QUALIFIED 

3 HEALTH PLAN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 36B(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘400 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘600 percent’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

8 (1) The table contained in clause (i) of section 

9 36B(b)(3)(A) of such Code is amended in the first 

10 column of the last row by striking ‘‘400%’’ and in11 serting ‘‘600%’’. 

12 (2) Clause (i) of section 36B(f)(2)(B) of such 

13 Code is amended— 

14 (A) by striking ‘‘400 percent’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘600 percent’’, and 

16 (B) in the first column of the last row of 

17 the table contained in such clause, by striking 

18 ‘‘400%’’ and inserting ‘‘600%’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De21 cember 31, 2014. 

22 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN EXCISE TAX RATE FOR SMALL CIGARS 

23 AND CIGARETTES. 

24 (a) IN GENERAL.— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2908 IS

1 (1) SMALL CIGARS.—Section 5701(a)(1) of the 

2 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik3 ing ‘‘$50.33’’ and inserting ‘‘$52.83’’. 

4 (2) SMALL CIGARETTES.—Section 5701(b)(1) 

5 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘$50.33’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘$52.83’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to articles removed (as defined in 

9 section 5702(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) 

10 after December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   CALCULATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<S> <C>

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

                                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               1998                1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income (Loss)                                                          $   (20,729)     $        228
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                            37,844            40,824

Adjustments necessary to reflect weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding on a diluted basis                                  647                57
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                38,491            40,881
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted net income (loss) per common share                                $      (0.54)     $       0.01
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


March 10, 2016


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:


(1)    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Sarah C. NewellSarah C. NewellVice President
----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending June 30, 004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick  White, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2004

| /s/ Patrick White                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                         |
| Patrick White        Principal Executive Officer and        Acting Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer |
News United States Air Force
 Air Force announces artificial intelligence research with MITPublished May 20, 2019
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson announced a contract with Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 20, focused on accelerating artificial intelligence technologies through fundamental research in computational intelligence, reasoning, decision-making, autonomy and relevant societal implications. The agreement includes selecting eleven Airmen for a research and development collaboration team designed to field practical AI solutions for real-world, national security challenges.
Beginning this summer, the combined officer and enlisted team representing various Air Force career fields, is expected to work with researchers at MIT to harness the university’s student talent, renowned faculty and state-of-the art facilities and laboratories.
“MIT is a leading institution for AI research, education and application, making this a huge opportunity for the Air Force as we deepen and expand our scientific and technical enterprise. Drawing from one of the best of American research universities is vital,” Wilson said.
The partnership will address a broad range of AI projects such as decision support, maintenance and logistics, talent management, medical readiness, situational awareness, business operations and disaster relief.
“This collaboration is very much in line with MIT’s core value of service to the nation,” said Maria Zuber, MIT’s vice president for research and the E.A. Griswold professor of geophysics. “MIT researchers who choose to participate will bring state-of-the-art expertise in AI to advance Air Force mission areas and help train Air Force personnel in applications of AI.”
As part of its Science and Technology Strategy, the Air Force launched a number of similar partnerships with higher education institutions around the U.S., each with a different focus area underscoring the Air Force’s emphasis on driving innovation through government, academic and private sector partnerships.
The Air Force plans to invest approximately $15 million per year as it builds upon its five-decade long relationship with MIT.FS 



Air Force 



AF 



innovation 



research 



MIT 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Heather Wilson 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Massachusetts Institute of Technology 



research and development 



collaboration 



artificial intelligence 



computational intelligence 



reasoning 



decision making 



autonomy 



officer 



enlisted 



education 



student 



university