alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KAREN MORTON AND LINDA YOUNG.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John W. Dwyer, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARLOS OLAYA.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied’
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1610
LES B. MARTIN; MILLIE A. MARTIN, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 93-21214) Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: July 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Les B. Martin, Millie A. Martin, Appellants Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Annette Marie Wietecha, Carol Ann Barthel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Les and Millie Martin appeal from the tax court’s order determining deficiencies and penalties with respect to their 1989 and 1990 federal income tax liability. Our review of the record and the tax court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Martin v. Commissioner , Tax Ct. No. 93-21214 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00189-CR

EX PARTE AUSTIN MICHAELIS §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 4

of Denton County (CR-2021-00513-D-WHC)

April 21, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
EXHIBIT 10.1

                     AMENDMENT TO 1994 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



         Amendment, dated as of April 19, 1999, to the Reebok International
Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan").

         The Plan shall be amended as follows:

         1. Section 7(c) of the Plan shall be amended by deleting such provision
in its entirety and substituting the following:

                  DURATION OF OPTIONS. The duration of any Option granted
                  hereunder shall be determined by the Committee at the time the
                  Option is granted, except that in the case of an ISO, the
                  duration shall be no more than ten years from the date the
                  Option was granted (five years in the case of an ISO granted
                  to a "ten-percent shareholder" as defined in (b) above).

         2. Section 11 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following
language at the end of such Section:

                  ; PROVIDED, however, that the Committee may, at the time of
                  the grant of an Award, permit the transfer of the Award by the
                  Participant through a gift to any or all of the following: any
                  child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent,
                  mother-in-law, father-in-law or spouse of the Participant, any
                  trust in which these persons have more than a fifty percent
                  (50%) beneficial interest or a foundation in which these
                  persons (or the Participant) control the management of assets,
                  and permit the retransfer of the Award by any of these
                  permitted transferees back to the Participant.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2726 

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the Nonadmitted and 

Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the 

Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Captive Insurers Clari5 fication Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPTIVE INSURERS. 

7 Section 527 of the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Re8 form Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 8206) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2726 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through 

2 (16) as paragraphs (5) through (17), respectively; 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(4) CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY.—The 

6 term ‘captive insurance company’ includes any insur7 ance company— 

8 ‘‘(A) that is wholly owned, directly or indi9 rectly, by a single parent company, and whose 

10 primary purpose is to provide insurance to 

11 cover the risks of such single parent company 

12 or any affiliates of such single parent company; 

13 ‘‘(B) that is wholly owned, directly or indi14 rectly, by a group of companies, and whose pri15 mary purpose is to provide insurance to cover 

16 the risks of such group of companies or any af17 filiates of such group of companies; and 

18 ‘‘(C) that is wholly owned, directly or indi19 rectly, by an industry, trade, or service group or 

20 association, and whose primary purpose is to 

21 provide insurance to cover the risks to any 

22 member in such group or association or any af23 filiate of such member.’’; and 

24 (3) in paragraph (12)(B), as so redesignated— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2726 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘ (B) does not include a 

2 risk retention group’’ and inserting the fol3 lowing: 

4 ‘‘(B) does not include— 

5 ‘‘(i) a risk retention group’’; 

6 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

7 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(ii) a captive insurance company.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Ralph A. Hill, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of WPX Energy, Inc.;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 20, 2012



/s/ Ralph A. HillRalph A. Hill
President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4673]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, Rev. James David Ford, D.D., offered the following 
prayer:
  We are reminded by the Psalmist that Your Word, O God, is a lamp to 
our feet and a light to our path. In these times when there are many 
options available to people in their lives and diverse opinions and 
ideas, we pray for lamps to lighten our way and show us the course to 
follow. We recognize that we can communicate with all the authorities 
from every background and attempt to gain all knowledge, and yet we 
know that to be touched by Your spirit is the beginning of wisdom. May 
that spirit, O God, that is new every morning, encourage and lighten 
our path, now and evermore. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
No. 07-14-00433-CR

Ex parte Thomas Michael Dixon §

§

§

§ From the 140 th District Court

Of Lubbock County

March 6, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 6, 2015

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the order of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
EXHIBIT 33.1




REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA




FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES






Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:




(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);




(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;




(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and




(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.






Date:  March 28, 2014






Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer






By:/s/ Alyson M. Mount




Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
[No. 23765-2-II.

Division Two.

May 19, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jerome L. Shumate, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 98-8-00195-9, Paula Casey, J., entered August 24, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,738,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,781)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,823,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,042,355
<BONDS>                                        332,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           473
<OTHER-SE>                                     423,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,823,255
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,973
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00353

- CV
IN THE MATTER OF J.M.S M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County , Texas , sitting as a Juvenile Court

Trial Cause No. 2011

- 05

- 364

- JE

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant although he is exempt from payment due to h is inability to pay costs

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 2 , 2014
EXHIBIT 31.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 9, 2005

/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force announces 12 Outstanding Airmen of 2020

              - Published  July 20, 2020
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Sahara L. Fales                                                    
              - Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **
Air Force officials have selected the service’s top enlisted members, naming the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year for 2020.An Air Force selection board at the **Air Force’s Personnel Center** considered 36 nominees who represented major commands, direct reporting units, field operating agencies and Headquarters Air Force. The board selected the 12 Airmen based on superior leadership, job performance and personal achievements.

 

Twelve Outstanding Airmen of the Year (alphabetically, by command of assignment when selected):
            - Senior Airman Cassidy B. Basney, United States Space Force
            - Master Sgt. Douglas K. Brock, Air National Guard
            - Tech. Sgt. Jeremiah C. Camper, Air Education and Training Command
            - Senior Master Sgt. Verna L. Cannon-Golemboski, Air Force Special Operations Command
            - Senior Airman Roxanne Y. Darien, Air Force Materiel Command
            - Tech. Sgt. Yvonne N. Febles-Rosario, Air Mobility Command
            - Tech. Sgt. Nicole A. Gansert, Air Force Reserve Command
            - Senior Master Sgt. Christopher A. Haney, USAFE-AFAFRICA
            - Senior Master Sgt. Wilfred A. Morgan, Air Force Global Strike Command
            - Tech. Sgt. Matthew M. O’Neill, Air Combat Command
            - Senior Master Sgt. Christopher M. Ricks, Pacific Air Forces
            - Senior Airman Portia L. Short, Air Force District of Washington    

The winners are authorized to wear the **Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon** with the bronze service star device on the ribbon. They are also authorized to wear the Outstanding Airman of the Year badge for one year from the date of formal presentation.

The MAJCOM nominee list is available on **myPers**> Recognition >Special Trophies and Awards or select the active-duty enlisted category from the dropdown menu and search “12 OAY.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceOutstanding Airmen of the Yearawards12 OAY2020Air Force Personnel CenterrecognitionTomorrow’s Air ForceExceptional Leaders
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Sierra County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Downieville, California. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss projects submitted for funding and the expenditure of Title II funds benefiting National Forest System lands in Sierra County.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 6, 2010 at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Downieville Community Hall, 327 Main St, Downieville, CA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ann Westling, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Tahoe National Forest, 631 Coyote St, Nevada City, CA, 95959, (530) 478-6205, e-mail:                         *awestling@fs.fed.us.*

Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Welcome and Introductions; (2) Review of RAC Operating Guidelines; (3) Discussion of Proposed Projects; (4) Vote on Proposed Projects; and (5) Comments from the Public. The meeting is open to the public and the public will have an opportunity to comment at the meeting.

Dated: September 7, 2010.

Judie L. Tartaglia,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-22875 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M