alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LEONORA R. GOTTFRIED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AND THE PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued February 20, 1980 —

Decided March 28, 1980.

*481
      *Richard H. Thiele, Jr.,*argued the cause for appellant.

*William L. Dill, Jr.,*argued the cause for respondents *(Stryker, Tams & Dill,*attorneys; *James D. Ferrucci*and *Charles H. Friederich*on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kole in the Appellate Division, reported at 173 *N.J.Super.*381 (1979).

*For reversal*—Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHRIEBER and HANDLER — 5.

*For affirmance*— None.
[No. 43847-6-I.

Division One.

April 3, 2000.]

#### Donna Benson, et al., *Appellants,*v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Island County, No. 98-2-00038-9, Alan R. Hancock, J., entered November 20, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Agid, C.J., and Baker, J.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

p0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

137390(45)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137390 COA: 277291 Wayne CC: 06-100037 ELIZABETH ANN EDENSTROM, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s February 4, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating. Justice Ha thaway recuses herself and will not participate in this case as sh e was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4556]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            TRADE WITH JAPAN

  (Mr. LEVIN asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. LEVIN. Mr. Speaker, in this box is a part. It is a universal 
joint. I bought it on Main Street America yesterday, Main Street, Royal 
Oak, MI. It costs $11.47. In Japan, this part would cost over $100.
  What does it mean, this differential? It means fewer jobs here in the 
United States because our products are locked out in Japan. It means 
fewer jobs and smaller profits for our industry which could be 
invested.
  It also means the Japanese consumers are overcharged, and it also 
means that Japanese companies use profits from their sheltered markets 
to gain market share here to invest in the rest of Asia and elsewhere 
with an unfair advantage.
  It is long overdue that Japan open up their automotive sector to 
parts and to cars. Talk has not worked. Action is necessary. We support 
the administration's efforts.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.2

   

   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

   

   

   In connection with the annual report of Energizer Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles B. Mathews, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

   

   Dated:August 31, 2015

   

   /s/ Charles B. Mathews

   Charles B. Mathews, Chief Financial Officer

   (Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1


March 13, 2014


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:


(1)    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Michael J. UlrichMichael J. UlrichVice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         11,714
<SECURITIES>                                   3,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                   840
<INVENTORY>                                    4,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24,520
<PP&E>                                         5,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,747
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       37
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,801
<SALES>                                        6,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,364
<CGS>                                          3,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                   414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            735
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.19
        

</TABLE>
#### Jane E. Derbyshire v. Sarah A. Strickland.

*Exchange of lands*— Bill *to enforce agreement for security.*

Complainant filed her bill to compel defendant to secure the payment of part of the consideration of an exchange of lands, and the decree granting such relief is affirmed. The case involves questions of fact purely.

Appeal from Eaton. (Hooker, J.)

Argued April 4, 1889.

Decided April 19,1889.

Bill to compel specific performance of an oral agreement to give security, bn exchange of lands. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*557
      *MePeek & Clarke,*for complainant.

*H. J. Patterson,*for defendant.

Campbell, J.

This suit in equity was brought to procure relief for the omission, either by fraud or mistake, to provide security for complainant for part of the consideration of an exchange of lands. As the case depends chiefly on facts, an extended reference to the conflicting testimony is not needed.

In November, 1886, complainant, who' owned a hotel property at Grand Ledge worth about $4,000, and subject to a mortgage of about $650, made a bargain to exchange it for a farm owned by defendant, which was subject to a mortgage of $1,800 in form, but reduced by payment •to not far from $1,500. The exchange was made on the assumption that each piece of property, unincumbered, was of the same value as the other, so that a balance of not far from $900 was to be made good to complainant for the difference between the mortgages. When the papers were completed, complainant, who seems to have been in some trouble from a recent bereavement, did not scrutinize the papers drawn, and put the deed made by defendant in the hands of defendant’s husband for record, and did not actually find out that defendant had not secured her against the excess in the farm mortgage until some time had elapsed. Defendant then refused to give security, and this bill was filed to compel it. Complainant’s claim is that the security was to have the operation of a purchase-money lien on the hotel property.

Defendant in her answer denied that she agreed to pay or secure the difference, and claims that by reason of certain deficiencies in the hotel the arrangement was made to exchange the two parcels as incumbered, and not as unincumbered. This claim, however, is not sustained by *558her testimony, although she does not admit that the difference was to be secured.

The testimony on complainant’s part is positive in favor of the claim that security was to be given, and, as there is no probability that in such a transaction any one of good sense would leave so considerable a part of the consideration without security, we have no doubt that the court below found correctly that such was the agreement. The decree appears to be in accordance with the equities, and we are not prepared to hold that the circumstances would not have justified the recognition of a vendor’s lien. But we need not decide this, because, in our .opinion, the facts justify the requirement of an express security.

The decree must be affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force sports recruiting online gaming Airmen for EVO 2020Published April 21, 2020
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force is recruiting Airmen – active duty and Reserve (on orders) – now through May 17 for the 2020 Air Force Esports team for the 2020 Evolution Championship Series, in Las Vegas, July 21 – Aug. 2.
EVO 2020 is an annual fighting game tournament. This year’s championship games include: Street Fighter V: Champion Edition, Tekken 7, Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, Dragonball FighterZ and Soulcalibur VI.
Selected Airmen will attend a virtual trial and selection camp May 26–June 5, and a training camp July 20–29.
Applications must be submitted via the **sports application tracking system**. APPTRAC replaced the Air Force Form 303 request for specialized sports training for all-Air Force sports and Headquarters Air Command programs.
The APPTRAC application process requires commanders, supervisors and athletes to create an account to be able to complete submission and approval. Training slides and instructions are posted in the Air Force Services Center Portal at the Fitness and Sports “What's New” **webpage**.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center 



AFIMSC 



Air Force Esports Team 



EVO 2020 



Evolution Championship Series 



recruitment 



gaming 



AFMC 



Air Force Materiel Command
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Acting SecAF visits USAFA, focuses on AF priorities, academy importance

              - Published  March 11, 2021
              -                             By Master Sgt. Benjamin Stratton                                                    
              - U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs

**U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --  **
Acting Secretary of the Air Force **John P. Roth** emphasized the importance of staying true to the Air Force priorities, supporting and defending the Constitution, serving the American people, and protecting the nation during his March 10 visit to the **Air Force Academy**.“The nation expects us to be ready to go when called upon,” Roth said. “So, making sure we have the best (new second lieutenants) from the academy, ROTC and OTS is vital for us to be able to do our job.”The best advice Roth said he could give to senior cadets preparing to graduate in May is to stay focused on those priorities when they become second lieutenants in the Air or Space Forces, and start leading Airmen.“We need to ask ourselves, ‘What do I need to do and what do I bring to the table?”’ he said. ‘“What value can I bring to help defend our nation tomorrow, five years from now or 10 years from now?’”Roth said the Department of the Air Force’s success hinges on the efforts of Total Force Airmen and Guardians who execute the service’s mission and the academy’s mission, and their constant strive towards innovation and continual improvement. He said the academy is a model for the Defense Department for its inroads in curtailing the effects of the coronavirus across its campus, and commended the school for always putting the health and safety of cadets, faculty and staff first.“Your analytically-based and novel-based approach to this has been fabulous,” he said. “My hats off to your leadership team who've kept cadets safe, and have still been able to maintain (the academy’s graduation commitment).”Roth also praised the academy as a model for the Air Force’s workforce in successfully balancing remote working and online learning for cadets while the school wrestled with the pandemic.“That kind of thinking is what I hope academy graduates bring to us — they've lived this hybrid life over the last year and know how to cope with it,” he said. “They can bring their best practices to the rest of the force.”

Roth said all Total Force Airmen, including faculty and staff at the academy, should continue to strive for these types of improvements.“We need to make sure that the education people are getting here prepares the academy's graduates to help us navigate as we go into the future,” he said. “The hope will be that someone coming out of the academy will have new, creative thoughts and might tell us old guys a better way to perform our mission.”During his visit to Colorado, Roth also visited the **Peterson-Schriever Garrison**in Colorado Springs, and **Buckley Air Force Base** in Denver.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceaSecAFJohn RothUSAFAU.S. Air Force AcademyprioritiesDistinguished VisitortourOne Air Forcetotal forceAirmenBuckley AFBpeterson-schriever garrison
EXHIBIT 35.1






SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT






I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:




(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Investment Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 between Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.




(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.











Date: March 29, 2012






Entergy Louisiana, LLC, as servicer




By:   /s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Name:   Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Title:     Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
#### CARAVELLE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. SOUTHERN UNIFORM RENTAL COMPANY.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000771677
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-B LTD PARTNERHSIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         386,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               387,009
<PP&E>                                       4,161,116
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,440,154)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,107,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,819,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,107,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                140,254
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   140,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    20.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    20.69
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Barrier Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis P Reilly, Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DENNIS P.
REILLY*                                               
|Dennis P. Reilly Vice President, Finance (Principal Accounting Officer)
|                                                                       
|March 12, 2008                                                         



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E931]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING A VISIT BY THE PRESIDENT OF 
                    THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON TAIWAN

                                 ______

                               speech of

                         HON. HOWARD L. BERMAN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995

  Mr. BERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 2 minutes.
  I just want to make 3 points: one to my colleagues, one to the 
Chinese Government, and one to the administration.
  I simply would remind my colleagues that this administration has 
actually done more than any of the previous administrations with 
respect to elevating its relationship with Taiwan. This is the first 
administration which has allowed high-level members of its Government 
to visit Taiwan. This is the administration that signed legislation 
last year passed by this Congress to allow Taiwanese-Americans to list 
Taiwan as their place of birth on passports, and in a whole variety of 
levels it has enhanced that cooperation.
  To the Chinese Government, I simply remind that Government, we have 
many differences. Both the gentlewoman from California and the 
gentleman from California have spoken to those differences.
  However, in and of itself the passage of this resolution does not 
speak to the question of whether our policy should be a one-China 
policy or a two-China policy or one China and one Taiwan policy. It 
deals very specifically with the question of President Lee making an 
informal visit, and it should not be construed in any other fashion.
  The third point is to the administration. I think you will see, by 
virtue of the unanimity of feeling on this subject in the Congress, 
that this issue will not simply go away, that it will not end with a 
passage of a sense of Congress resolution, and that legislation will be 
coming that will seek to mandate this visit if the administration's 
policy does not change. I urge them to reconsider this aspect of their 
policy.

                          ____________________
```