alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mahlon Pitney, Ordinary.

Edwin Bobert Walker, Yice-Ordinary.

#### Henry Huston, administrator, &c., of Catharine A. Roe, deceased, appellant, *v.*Minnie Roe, respondent.

[Decided November 1st, 1910.]

An administrator having adopted loose methods in dealing with the affairs of his estate, and having delayed his accounting for more than fifteen years after the time when it ought to have been filed, doubts arising upon the evidence -taken on exceptions to his account were resolved against him.

*216On appeal from a decree of Sussex county orphans court.

*Mr. Henry Huston, pro se,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Charles M. Woodruff,*for the respondent.

Pitney, Ordinary.

This controversy arises over the final accounting of the appellant as administrator of Catharine A. Boe, deceased. The respondent filed numerous exceptions, and tire orphans court, after a hearing, sustained these exceptions in part and disallowed them in part. The administrator appealed to this court. The respondent, in her answer to his petition of appeal, specified (as permitted ly the rules) certain items in the account with respect to which she claims the decree to be erroneous as against her and in favor of the appellant.

The disputable questions are almost wholly questions of fact; the matters are somewhat complicated; the evidence, oral and documentary, is voluminous, and the oral evidence not altogether lucid or satisfactory.

Judge Coult, who heard and decided the case in the orphans court, filed a carefully-prepared statement of his conclusions, containing a clear presentation of the controversy, the character of the evidence and the results reached by him.

After repeatedly examining the ease, I have come to the conclusion that the resulting decree must be affirmed, substantially for the reasons given by him.

If there be doubt whether this decree is precisely correct, any error in it must be attributed to the appellants loose mode of dealing with the affairs of the estate, and his failure to file his accounting until nearly twenty jrnars had elapsed since his appointment as administrator; whereas the orphans court held, and I think correctly, that at the latest the final account ought to have been filed within four years after such appointment.

The costs of the respondent should be paid by the appellant out of his own estate.
#### STATE v. McQUAIG

No. 120P01

Case below: 142 N.C. App. 214

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas denied and temporary stay dissolved 19 July 2001. Notice of appeal by Attorney General pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 19 July 2001. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 19 July 2001 for limited purpose to remand to the North Carolina Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of *State v. Lucas.*Conditional petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 19 July 2001.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2868 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2868

   To establish a statute of limitations for certain actions of the 
      Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2014

  Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Shaheen, and Ms. 
    Warren) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish a statute of limitations for certain actions of the 
      Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR COMMISSION ACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78u) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Statute of Limitations.--
            ``(1) Civil monetary penalties.--
                    ``(A) In general.--An action or proceeding brought 
                or instituted by the Commission under any provision of 
                the securities laws for a civil monetary penalty may be 
                brought not later than 10 years after the violation.
                    ``(B) Exclusion.--The period of limitations in 
                subparagraph (A) does not run during any time when an 
                alleged violator is absent from the United States or 
                has no reasonably ascertainable place of abode or work 
                within the United States.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        term `civil monetary penalty' means relief sought by the 
        Commission under--
                    ``(A) section 20(d) of the Securities Act of 1933 
                (15 U.S.C. 77t(d));
                    ``(B) section 21(d)(3), 21A(a), subsections (a) 
                through (d) of section 21B, section 32(b), 32(c)(1)(B), 
                or 32(c)(2)(B) of this title (15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3), 15 
                U.S.C. 78u-1(a), 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(a)-(d), 15 U.S.C. 
                78ff(b), 15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(1)(B), 15 U.S.C. 
                78ff(c)(2)(B));
                    ``(C) section 9(d) or 42(e) of the Investment 
                Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-9(d), 15 U.S.C. 80a-
                41(e)); or
                    ``(D) section 203(i) or 209(e) of the Investment 
                Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(i), 15 U.S.C. 
                80b-9(e)).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 21A(d) of the Securities Act of 
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78u-1(d)) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
                                 <all>
```
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00149-CV

__________________

CARNELLIA SAMMONS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

V.

KATHY ARLENE SAMMONS SERWINEK, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 21-01-00505-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Carnellia Sammons, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and Kathy Arlene Sammons 

Serwinek, Appellee/Cross-Appellant jointly filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and 

cross-appeal with prejudice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The parties to the appeal 

filed the motion before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 25, 2023

Opinion Delivered October 26, 2023

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: January 29, 2016/s/ Andrew J. KandalepasName: Andrew J. KandalepasTitle: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
No. 84053 

FL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

RESIGNATION OF JOHN P. SKALAK, 

BAR NO. 4385. 

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION 

This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney 

John P. Skalak for his resignation from the Nevada bar. 

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively 

practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain 

conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff 

confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security 

fund matters are pending against Skalak.; and that he is current on all 

membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his 

practice of law in this state. See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2). 

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be 

approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for 

resignation. See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Skalak acknowledges that his resignation 

is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction with 

respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior to resignation. 

See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Skalak has submitted an affidavit of 

compliance with SCR 115. See SCR 98(5)(e). 

SUPREME COURT 

Of 

NEVADA 

(CH I947A der. 

• • 11-.7? "- ,..

-fe.•,: 7: 
The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). 

Accordingly, we approve attorney John P. Skalak's resignation. SCR 

98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

C.J. 

cc: State Bar of Nevada/Las Vegas 

John P. Skalak 

Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A AB*. 

* 

, bV•
News United States Air Force
 AF implements changes to improve law enforcement database reportingPublished Nov. 28, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force's review of its reporting processes to civilian law enforcement in the Devin P. Kelley case has prompted immediate actions to correct reporting deficiencies and prevent future occurrences. 
The Air Force’s review and corrective actions will continue over the next several months as the broader Department of Defense review proceeds.
Preliminary findings by the Air Force Inspector General confirmed the Air Force Office of Special Investigations and Security Forces personnel then assigned at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, did not report required information to civilian law enforcement in the Kelley case. The review also found the error in the Kelley case was not an isolated incident and similar reporting lapses occurred at other locations. Although policies and procedures requiring reporting were in place, training and compliance measures were lacking.
The Air Force OSI has already implemented corrective measures to ensure compliance with reporting requirements to civilian law enforcement. In addition, Air Force Security Forces have also implemented several corrective measures and remaining actions will be completed in the next few weeks.
Among the new procedures is a leadership requirement at the field, regional and headquarters levels to verify that information from applicable cases is registered with the FBI's National Crime Information Center's Interstate Identification Index. Additionally, supporting software, checklist and training changes were made to support the new procedures.  
Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein directed OSI and Security Forces to review all Air Force records with reportable offenses across the Air Force back to 2002. In order to complete the review and implement corrective measures, two task forces comprised of 30 members from each organization are aggressively working to ensure 100 percent compliance.
Air Force officials are correcting all identified deficiencies as they are discovered and reporting them to civilian law enforcement. The full review will be completed over the next several months.
The Air Force will continue to take steps to identify and remedy shortfalls as the review continues. The Air Force IG is closely monitoring all corrective actions and the ongoing review of records to assess progress and report to Air Force leadership.SecAF 



CSAF 



security forces 



review 



OSI 



Law Enforcement 



FBI 



task force 



reporting process 



Devin P. Kelley
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 of Bayview Acquisition Corp. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Scott R. ChichesterScott R. ChichesterChief Executive Officer/s/ Scott R. ChichesterScott R. ChichesterChief Financial OfficerDated: April 13, 2012   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Bayview Acquisition Corp and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                   AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany American Business Financial
Services, Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three
months ending March 31, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying
the requirements of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, I, Anthony J.
Santilli, hereby certify in my capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


                                                     Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Anthony J. Santilli
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 13, 2003
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District

1

Judge for the District of South Dakota.

___________

No. 95-3454

___________

Elroy Wabasha, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Joe Class, Warden, South Dakota *

State Penitentiary, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 1, 1996

 Filed: May 3, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Elroy Wabasha, a South Dakota prisoner, pleaded guilty to firstdegree robbery, and was sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment. The

South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed the denial of his application for

postconviction relief. Wabasha v. Leapley, 492 N.W.2d 610 (S.D. 1992).

Wabasha then filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) petition for writ of habeas

corpus in the District Court. The District Court denied the petition

1

without an evidentiary hearing, and Wabasha appeals.

After careful review of the record before us and the parties' briefs,

we conclude the District Court correctly denied Wabasha's petition.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E937-E938]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO EDWARD FELDMAN

                                 ______

                         HON. HOWARD L. BERMAN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 3, 1995
  Mr. BERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I am honored to pay tribute to Edward 
Feldman, who is completing a 2-year term as chair of the UCLA 
Governmental Relations Steering Committee. I had the pleasure of 
working with Ed on nursing home issues when I served in the California 
Legislature in the 1970's, and can attest to his zeal and dedication in 
fighting for those causes in which he believes.
  A fellow UCLA alumnus, Ed has spent 21 of the past 27 years 
specializing in the investigation and prosecution of white collar 
crimes for the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office. His areas of 
responsibility included the major fraud 
[[Page E938]] division, where he served for more than 11 years, the 
Nursing Home Abuse Section and the Special Investigations Division. In 
August 1993, Ed was appointed acting head deputy of the newly formed 
Workers' Compensation Fraud Division of the Los Angeles County District 
Attorney's Office.
  Ed recently supplanted his busy professional life with his role as 
chair of the Governmental Relations Steering Committee, which assists 
UCLA by providing alumni support for issues coming before Federal, 
State, and local elected officials. UCLA was lucky to have him.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in saluting Ed Feldman, a 
public servant who works tirelessly to promote social justice. He is a 
shining example to us all.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Investment Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 between Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.








Date:  March 28, 2019





Entergy Louisiana, LLC, as servicer





By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
News United States Air Force
 Munitions complex coming to Eglin AFBPublished May 8, 2019
                        
                        By Jennifer Vollmer
                        
                        
                        Eglin Air Force Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                A groundbreaking ceremony was held at Eglin Air Force Base, May 7, for a new $75 million munitions research complex.The Air Force Research Laboratory facility, officially designated as the Advanced Munitions Technology Complex, will provide increased munitions research and test capabilities for the warfighter.“The Advanced Munitions Technology Complex is not just a series of buildings. It’s a center that brings minds together to conceive of next generation sophisticated ordnance technologies in an efficient way,” said Dr. Michael Lindsay, AFRL core technical competency lead for ordnance sciences.Technologies developed at the AMTC aim to reduce the size of munitions without sacrificing weapon effects. The lighter munitions will allow next generation aircraft, such as the F-22 and F-35, to carry more weapons in order to increase mission effectiveness.The 52,625 square-foot complex will be designed as a modern, collaborative research space providing scientists and engineers the ability to experiment with new explosive materials and integrate them into complex munition designs much more efficiently.According to Lindsay, the facility will allow AFRL to develop an entire ordnance system simultaneously for the first time. Currently, ordnance systems are developed as individual components.Integrating the process allows scientists and engineers to understand how each technology enhances the other, resulting in increased precision delivery while minimizing collateral damage.  “We need facilities that attract the best research talent and enable us to be agile and work efficiently and concurrently. That is why this groundbreaking is so important,” Lindsay explained.The facility is scheduled to be completed by 2021.Air Force Research Laboratory 



AFRL 



Advanced Munitions Technology Complex 



AMTC 



test capabilities 



warfighter 



Next Generation 



sophisticated 



ordnance 



technologies 



F-22 



Raptor 



F-35 



Lightning II 



groundbreaking 



Eglin AFB 



Air Combat Command 



ACC 



Air Force Base 



AFWN 



LR
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MANUEL BELLO.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.