alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1998
<CASH>                                      80,702,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,413,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                   654,986
<INVENTORY>                                 35,077,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           147,517,716
<PP&E>                                      78,450,034
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,827,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             205,361,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,555,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       231,203
<OTHER-SE>                                 185,748,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               205,361,391
<SALES>                                    120,551,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           120,551,662
<CGS>                                       85,972,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               85,972,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,320,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,525,643
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,246,819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,278,824
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,278,824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 383 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 383

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of 
   Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the 
                National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SEGMENTS.

    Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(208) Illabot creek, washington.--
                    ``(A) The 14.3-mile segment from the headwaters of 
                Illabot Creek to the northern terminus as generally 
                depicted on the map titled `Illabot Creek Proposed WSR-
                Northern Terminus', dated September 15, 2009, to be 
                administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 
                follows:
                            ``(i) The 4.3-mile segment from the 
                        headwaters of Illabot Creek to the boundary of 
                        Glacier Peak Wilderness Area as a wild river.
                            ``(ii) The 10-mile segment from the 
                        boundary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to the 
                        northern terminus as generally depicted on the 
                        map titled `Illabot Creek Proposed WSR-Northern 
                        Terminus', dated September 15, 2009, as a 
                        recreational river.
                    ``(B) Action required to be taken under subsection 
                (d)(1) for the river segments designated under this 
                paragraph shall be completed through revision of the 
                Skagit Wild and Scenic River comprehensive management 
                plan.''.

            Passed the Senate June 19, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 383

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of 
   Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the 
                National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9201-5]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of Charter Renewal.

The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC) will be renewed for an additional two-year period. This is a committee of public interest and acts in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 9(c). The purpose of the NEJAC is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator on issues associated with integrating environmental justice concerns into EPA's programs, policies, and activities. Particular areas of focus may include community engagement, science, regulatory development, and enforcement and compliance.

Inquiries may be directed to Victoria Robinson, NEJAC Designated Federal Officer, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., (Mail Code 2201A), Washington, DC 20460.

Dated: September 8, 2010.

Charles Lee,

Director, Office of Environmental Justice, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.

[FR Doc. 2010-22858 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### DANIEL REID v. TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 198 *N.J.Super.*229)
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

I, Dennis M. Mulroy, ChiefFinancial Officer of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006
News United States Air Force
 2020 nuclear deterrence, missile operations awards announcedPublished May 19, 2021
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Nicolas Z. Erwin
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force recently announced the winners of the 2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations and the Nuclear and Missile Operations Award.
These awards recognize the accomplishments of Airmen contributing to nuclear deterrence operations across the Department of the Air Force and the achievements of officers within the nuclear and missile operations career field.
“The Nuclear Deterrence Operations Award Program enhances the visibility of the many Airmen who support these operations and recognizes outstanding achievement across the nuclear enterprise,” said**Lt. Gen. James C. Dawkins, Jr.**, Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration deputy chief of staff. “These outstanding nuclear professionals have shown themselves to be the best of the best.”These nuclear professionals were selected from all major commands, unified combatant commands and agencies, which includes the**Air Force Reserve** and **Air National Guard**. These individuals are authorized to wear the **Air Force Recognition Ribbon**.**Nuclear Deterrence Operations Award winners:**

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Airman of the Year: Senior Airman Jenny L. Rose

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Noncommissioned Officer of the Year: Tech. Sgt. John M. Rasband

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Senior Noncommissioned Officer of the Year: Senior Master Sgt. Andrew J. Rapsavage

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Company Grade Officer of the Year: Capt. Samuel T. Darnell

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Field Grade Officer of the Year:  Maj. Mason W. Kehs

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Civilian Category I: Mr. Jason A. Aven

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Civilian Category II: Mr. Jerald L. Rogers

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Civilian Category III: Dr. Gretchen R. Phelps

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Guard or Reservist of the Year: Master Sgt. Frances D. Christian

2020 Nuclear Deterrence Operations Professional Team of the Year: Global Strike Munitions Division, Air Force Global Strike Command

**Nuclear and Missile Operations Award winners:**

2020 Nuclear & Missile Operations Operator of the Year: Capt. David M. Barnhart

2020 Nuclear & Missile Operations Company Grade Officer of the Year: Capt. Jeffrey M. Mattheis

2020 Nuclear & Missile Operations Field Grade Officer of the Year: Maj. Alex S. Rich
This award program has been administered and overseen by the Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration deputy chief of staff since 2014.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



awards 



One Air Force 



announcement 



DAF 



recognition 



accomplishment 



nuclear 



missile operations 



nuclear professionals 



AF Awards 



Air Force Recognition Ribbon
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SEBASTIAN GOMEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CR-96-806)

Submitted: June 9, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sebastian Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sebastian Gomez appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for clarification and for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Gomez, No. CR-96-806 (D.S.C. filed

Dec. 17, 2003 & entered Dec. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CLARENCE A. MUNGER, DECEASED.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                    3,616,800
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               551,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          4,168,300
<PP&E>                                   48,726,400
<DEPRECIATION>                           16,842,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           36,352,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,135,900
<BONDS>                                  34,224,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                              (1,040,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             36,352,000
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          6,619,600
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             3,356,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            147,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,057,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (51,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (51,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (51,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
CHEDRICK LECHARLES
TOLBERT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1277

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark J. Borello , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BERNARD LAUFGAS.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
[No. 23918-3-II.

Division Two.

April 7, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lori G. Harsila, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 98-1-00749-2, Leonard W. Kruse, J., entered October 26, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Bridge-water, J.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES SCOTT, JR.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

t1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143784

PAULA PASCHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 143784 COA: 302636 WCAC: 09-000065 CITY OF LANSING, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 23, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

## , J., would grant leave to appeal.
News United States Air Force
 Dover AFB reservists support nation’s counterdrug effortPublished April 13, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Zachary Cacicia
                        
                        
                        512th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **DOVER AIR FORCE BASE, Del. (AFNS) --**
                Amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, a512th Airlift Wing aircrew composed of Reserve Airmen airlifted counterdrug equipment out of Panama during the week of April 6.

The mission fromDover Air Force Base, supporting the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, involved hauling more than 100,000 pounds of cargo from Panama Pacifico International Airport, Panama, to San Angelo Regional Airport, Texas.

“It was a difficult mission because of all the moving parts and the constantly changing dynamics,” said Capt. Scott McCoy, 709th Airlift Squadron pilot and aircraft commander. “It was successful, because we had a crew of highly experienced people who went above and beyond to make sure the job got done.”

Loadmasters and DHS personnel filled the cargo compartment with 12 pallets and 11 rolling stock items that included mobile generators, trailers and surveillance equipment used to counter illicit drug trafficking throughout the region.

The 512th AW regularly participates in these operations with both itsC-5M Super Galaxyand C-17 Globemaster IIIaircraft to deliver personnel and material for other government agencies, while receiving readiness training for its aircrew.

In addition to the primary mission of transporting cargo, three loadmasters and a flight engineer received and passed evaluation check-rides, ensuring their updated qualifications and readiness.

“With minimal on-ground support in Panama, these loadmasters successfully accomplished a difficult load in an efficient manner,” said Master Sgt. David Finfinger, 709th AS evaluator loadmaster.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFRC 



Air Force Reserve Command 



Dover AFB 



DHS 



Department of Homeland Security 



reservist 



counterdrug 



512th Airlift Wing 



airlift 



Panama 



C-17 



Globemaster III 



C-5M 



Super Galaxy
2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-19-2010

Fatai Oladejo v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 08-3043

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Fatai Oladejo v. Atty Gen USA" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 1691.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/1691
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3043

___________

FATAI OLADEJO, 

a/k/a Faith Oladejo,

 Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES

____________________________________

On Petition for Review of an Order 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

 Agency No. A70 893 108

Immigration Judge: Alberto J. Riefkohl

____________________________________

ORDER SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before: FUENTES, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges

The judges who participated in the decision of this Court having considered the petition

for rehearing filed by Fatai Oladejo in the above-entitled case, panel rehearing is hereby

GRANTED for the reasons stated. The not precedential opinion and judgment filed on

December 18, 2009 are hereby VACATED and the attached opinion is filed forthwith.

By the Court,

/s/ Julio M. Fuentes,

Circuit Judge

Dated: March 19, 2010

ARL/cc: AWH; SMC; FO; TCU
[No. 18165-1-III.

Division Three.

May 30, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Parentage*of B.B., Randall G. Bostrom, *Appellant,*and Jean Elizabeth Romero, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 97-5-00155-2, Michael W Leavitt, J., entered November 20, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Munson, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Sweeney and Kato, JJ.
iii 

### of NiandamLiS i)ismisscd, ()pinion issued November 14, 2012

In The 

## uurt uf \ppra1 Fift1! Iiitrirt uf Eixa at at1as No. 05-12-01508-CV IN RE LESLIE EARL VOLLMER, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court

### No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court CauseNo. F07-73954-H 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before

### Justices Bridges, Lang. and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ ofmandamus naming the district clerk. Gary Fitzsimmons, as respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not 

### recountthem herein. 

### This Court does not have mandamusjurisdiction overthe districtclerk. See TEN. (by T CoDE ANN. 

## § 22.221 (West 2004). Accordingly. 

### we DISMISS 

### relator’s petitionfora writ of

### mandamus for want ofjurisdiction.

• DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE 121 508F.P05