alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-24-00125-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

NATALIE AGUILAR, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 28TH DISTRICT COURT

OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final 

appealable order. On February 16, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to 

appeal a conviction in trial court cause number 17FC-1495A. In response to a late brief 

notice, appellant filed a response informing that the trial court granted a new trial on April 
2

3, 2024, and included a copy of the trial court’s order with the response. Therefore, the 

Court is now without jurisdiction, as there is no final judgment of conviction before it.

Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a 

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. 

State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 

161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: 

(1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 

942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to 

reduce bond, TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals 

from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—

Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.

Our review of the documents before the Court shows that appellant’s case is still 

pending in the trial court. Moreover, the notice of appeal cannot be construed as 

premature because it was filed before the trial court made a finding of guilt or received a 

jury verdict. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.1(b). Therefore, this cause is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed on the

28th day of August, 2024.
#### SHERMAN VIRDEN v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

Jan. 14, 1980.

This matter having been submitted to the Court as a petition for certification, and the Court having considered the same and having determined that the matter is interlocutory and should be considered as an application for leave to appeal; it is hereupon ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is denied. (See 167 *N.J.Super.*209)
News United States Air Force
 Eielson AFB exercises rapid combat readiness, demonstrates arctic abilityPublished Dec. 23, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Keith Holcomb
                        
                        
                        354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AFNS) --**
                The 354th Fighter Wing and the 168th Wing Air National Guard completed a readiness exercise Dec. 18, verifying the wing’s ability to rapidly generate combat airpower at **Eielson Air Force Base**. More than 30 fighters and two refueling aircraft participated in the exercise.
The formation executed on the runway is known as an “elephant walk.” This formation tested the rapid readiness of every flying unit on Eielson AFB and displayed the combined airpower of the 354th FW and the 168th Wing.
"The elephant walk isn’t only to practice our abilities to respond quickly," said Col. David Skalicky, 354th Operations Group commander. "This is to show our Airmen who work behind the scenes what Eielson AFB is about, it’s about showing our strength in the arctic arena."
Skalicky continued, reminding the Airmen in a pre-exercise briefing, “We are executing this despite coronavirus, despite the extreme weather conditions, and despite that it’s one of the shortest days of the year.”
With great amounts of planning, preparation and communication, 18 **F-35A Lightning II**s, 12 **F-16 Fighting Falcon**s, and two **KC-135 Stratotankers** arrived on the flightline ready for a takeoff.
“Every Airman across the (354th) Fighter Wing contributed to today’s event, and we proved what our team is capable of ... supporting, defending, or delivering fifth-generation airpower and advanced training. Stay tuned, because our combat capability will continue to grow, and I’m incredibly proud of the disciplined, professional, combat-focused approach our team displayed today,” said Col. David Berkland, the 354th FW commander.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Eielson AFB 



Alaska 



F-35 Lightning II 



F-16 Fighting Falcon 



356th FS 



355th FS 



18th Aggressor Squadron 



354th FW 



168th Wing 



readiness 



mobility 



combat 



airpower 



elephant walk 



arctic
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          2,631
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 121,533<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              134,567
<PP&E>                                         53,172<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,265,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         146,247
<BONDS>                                       122,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,297<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                    967,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,265,830
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              397,617<F4>
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 280,635<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               53,061<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              7,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                56,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                   32,375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            24,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   24,470
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .21
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>REFLECTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.
<F3>COMPRISED OF COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B STOCK.
<F4>COMPRISED OF NET REVENUES.
<F5>COMPRISED OF OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION AND
          AMORTIZATION.
<F6>COMPRISED OF DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION, AND CORPORATE GENERAL AND
          ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.
</FN>



</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ISAAC GILMORE
, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 968

[ November 24, 2021 ]

Administrative a ppeal from the Department of Business and Professional Regulation ; L.T. Case No. 2020

- 022885 CILB

.

Isaac Gilmore, Hollywood, pro se.

Austin Kirtley, Assistant General Counsel, Unlicensed Activity, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for

ap pellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, G ERBER and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: 2021 Air Force Budget Proposal, Space Force names, Child Care AppPublished Feb. 21, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force features info on the 2021 Air Force Budget proposal, Space Force search for naming conventions and a new child care mobile app. (Hosted by Senior Airman Angelo Rosario)

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:

-2021 Air Force Budget Proposal: Great Power Competition, Readiness and Space Force
- US Space Force looking for feedback on naming conventions
- IdeaScale website for name submissions
- Childcare app idea wins at 2020 Innovation RodeoFeatured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Airmen 



budget 



2021 



Air Force budget 



space force 



childcare 



app 



Innovation Rodeo
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Jon W. Gacek, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                     |  |                                                                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 16, 2003 |  | JON W. GACEK                                                                                                
|                     |  |                                                                                                             
|                     |  | Jon W. Gacek, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

24
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41366

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAMIRO BASALDUA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-856-3

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ramiro Basaldua pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess five

kilograms or more of cocaine with intent to distribute. After determining that

Basaldua was subject to the career offender provisions of § 4B1.1 of the United

States Sentencing Guidelines, the district court sentenced him to 292 months in

prison, at the bottom of the advisory guidelines range. Basaldua appeals,

arguing that neither his current conviction nor his prior federal drug conspiracy

conviction constitutes a controlled substance offense for purposes of § 4B1.1.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 10, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41366 Document: 00512268070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2013
No. 12-41366

Specifically, Basaldua contends that because a federal conspiracy under 21

U.S.C. § 846 does not require proof of an overt act, it does not meet the generic

definition of conspiracy. However, he asserts that his argument is foreclosed by

United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 754 (5th Cir. 2012), cert.

denied, 2013 WL 1313840 (Apr. 29, 2013), and he has filed an unopposed motion

seeking summary disposition.

As Basaldua concedes, we rejected materially indistinguishable arguments

in Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d at 753-54. Although that case involved the

definition of a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2 of the Guidelines, we

discern no reason that its analysis should not apply to the nearly identical

definition of a controlled substance offense for purposes of § 4B1.1. See, e.g.,

United States v. Henao-Melo, 591 F.3d 798, 803 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2009) (comparing

the two definitions and noting that, given their similarities, this court cites

decisions interpreting them interchangeably). 

In light of the foregoing, Basaldua’s motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

2

 Case: 12-41366 Document: 00512268070 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2013
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    REPUBLICANS IN THE MEDICARE BOX

  (Mr. RICHARDSON asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. RICHARDSON. Mr. Speaker, Republicans are in a box. They are 
trying to divert attention from what they are trying to do to Medicare. 
They are cutting Medicare by $300 billion, and they do not know how to 
explain it.
  The reason is that they have to find a way to pay for their tax cuts 
for a tax cut that benefits 1 percent of the population making over 
$230,000 per year. That is not class warfare. Those are the facts.
  Here are the Medicare excuses: Another commission to study the 
problem, slow the growth of Medicare, tinker with the Medicare trust 
fund.
  Mr. Speaker, the facts are clear. They are cutting Medicare to pay 
for a tax cut for America's wealthy, the crown jewel of the Contract 
With America.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 44487-5-I.

Division One.

April 24, 2000.]

#### Robert E. Guy, Jr., et al., *Appellants,*v. Mark F. Reekie, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kang County, No. 97-2-30957-3, Donald D. Haley, J., entered March 18, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Cox and Appelwick, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4674]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              BALANCING THE BUDGET ON THE BACKS OF SENIORS

  (Ms. JACKSON-LEE asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. JACKSON-LEE. Mr. Speaker, I rise this morning, as the Committee 
on the Budget is meeting and deliberating. But more importantly, as we 
are instructed to keep close to our constituents, I have come back 
recently from interacting with the constituents of the 18th 
Congressional District in Texas, and what I have heard most of all is 
that we should work together, that we should focus our issues not as 
Democratic or Republican, but as American issues, and yet, as the 
Committee on the Budget deliberates, they now talk about cutting 
Medicare spending between $270 and $280 billion over the next 7 years 
and $184 billion for Medicaid.
  Mr. Speaker, these are not working-class/middle-class issues. These 
are issues of the American working people who want to confront better 
health care for their citizens.
  My seniors have said to me, ``Don't cut Medicare, make it more 
efficient. Cut the waste, but don't cut Medicare.''
  Now we find that the new budget plan is on the backs of seniors in 
America. But it is not only on the backs of seniors. It is on our 
medical facilities, our community hospitals. It is on our physicians 
who dedicate their lives to serving American working people.
  We must confront this as an American issue, and we must not turn our 
backs on our seniors. I will not let Texas down. I will not let the 
citizens of the 18th Congressional District down by recklessly cutting 
Medicare and Medicaid for an ill-conceived budget.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 34.1








ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES








To the Board of Directors and Members


Entergy Louisiana, LLC


Jefferson, Louisiana





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding I, L.L.C.’s Senior Secured Investment Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 29, 2016
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |
| 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |
| 5. | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Recruiting Diversity, Airmen Aid Flood Victims and Record-Breaking SatellitePublished July 23, 2021
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Eric Mann
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                Today’s look around the Air Force highlights Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. CQ Brown, Jr.’s recruiting message that emphasizes diversity, civil engineering Airmen from Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, aid local communities before and after area floods, and the Air Force Research Lab’s DSX Satellite completes its record-breaking mission. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Benjamin Cooper)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- CSAF delivers powerful message in new Air Force commercial****- 52nd CES volunteers answer call to aid local communities****- AFRL conducts 1,300 experiments on record-breaking satellite**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



AFRL 



CES 



CSAF 



diversity