alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### _July 21, 2@15 

# 6I1'<S
_JOSE AMILPAS 1908295 Robertson Unit 12071 FM 3522 Abilene, Texas 796®S-3799

H@a. Abel Aeosta, Clark 

### Q&wzi @£ Criminal Appeals P.O. Bos 123©$9 Capitol Station Aastira, Texas 7§711-230i IE: Court ©f Crisis®1 Appeals Ho. PDCourt of Appeals Gase N®. ©1-14~0©@53-C1 Trial Court Case No. 1334791 

### FILED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

### JUL 27 2015 AbelAcosta, Clerk

Bear Mr. Acosta: 

### Please find encl®@©$ ay PETITI®IE1*S M0TIM'-.REQUESTING A SECl ®m EXTENSI6H @F TIME ©UIIUG WHICH TIKE F®K FILING HIS PETITION 

### F©R DISCRETIONARY- REVIEW, that I ask y@u to please promptly pre sent to the Court. 

### Be advised that I have forwarded carb@o copies ©f saa®. under 

### cover of.;a?.copy ©f, this letter9 to the State Pr®secuting Attorney, and to ' Msr. jJess&ca Caird, Esq., Assistant District Attorney,:&at the District Attorney's ©ffic© in Houston. I ©nee ssg&i© thank y@u s® very ssuch., in advance, for your ve ry kind and generous assistance with this matter. Very respectfully,, I resai®, Hour raost obedient servant.



### ec:: Ms^Jessies Caird,Esq. •'' Ms.Lisa UfeMinn,Esq." Mr. GeB&m 1. Siammis . ftenonal Legal File
- TM Euc: As stated! absve *L AMILPAS, pro se 

# .1ECE1VE0 ^lAcoSta,Cterk1 1
IN THE COURT ©F CRIMINAL APPEALS © F TEXAS

I®. JOSE AMXLPAS, Petiti®®gr~Appellan£
THE STATE ©F TEIAS, Respondent-Appellee ®n Petiti@n For ©iscretionary Review ©f Appeal No. ©l-14-0@©53-CR In The Appellate Court For The First Appellate District At Houst@n 

### PETITIONER'S MOTION REQUESTING A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME DURING WHICH TIME FOR FILING HIS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW TO THE HONORABLEJEDOGES ©F THE COURT: 

### IBJTQ C«ST eeaes^Jose Ami2pas ("Aoilpas"), PetitionerB&JS. *» this actl<mt®s^ggseetfeBliy rave this.Court to grant hits an additional enlargement of tte in ^dssk m file.his petition f©r disssetierary wsm.&s (^f) ®f she de cision and jssigaesit ©f Shs First C®urt ©f ^sf@als eater®! m <&pril 23, 2®15, in 

### Kb. 0i-M-®®§53-Cl, affiKnfag.£» trial court's .jafepja* in Cause No. 1334791 in. fche 174th^Judicial Mstrict Court of Harris County, Teaas. In support ©f this 

### motion, Aailg&as rmsMabsv.-flfae C©ao:t ftfes f®ll©wing: I. The judgment ®f She Csurt ®f appeals vm ®m£®s®i in this ©tfcion on Agcil 

### 23, 2015; andtaaferRule 68.2(a) ®£ the Texas Rules ofAppellate Keocedasre Amilpas hai Shirty (3®)(lays ffrem thatdate during «Mdh to file his HR,•BakingMs petition dae on @rfefim Saturday, May 23, 2015. However, counsel that repceseated JaUpor m appeal E@alig©i fifcafcJsarasuld n®s£iD©r@ tisaetiban Sfee.thirty 

### days nrantfl^/.allftttai f®rpreparing and sutaitt&ag.his-MR, s® counselprovid-

-1-
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2856 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2856

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the credit for 
  production of electricity from renewable resources for certain open-
loop biomass and trash facilities placed in service before the date of 
                       the enactment of this Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2014

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Cardin, and Ms. Collins) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the credit for 
  production of electricity from renewable resources for certain open-
loop biomass and trash facilities placed in service before the date of 
                       the enactment of this Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 45(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Special rule for certain qualified facilities.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of electricity 
                produced at a qualified facility described in paragraph 
                (3) or (7) of subsection (d) and placed in service 
                before the date of the enactment of this paragraph, a 
                taxpayer may elect to apply subsection (a)(2)(A)(ii) by 
                substituting `the period beginning after December 31, 
                2013, and ending before January 1, 2016' for `the 10-
                year period beginning on the date the facility was 
                originally placed in service'.
                    ``(B) Limitation.--No credit shall be allowed under 
                subsection (a) to any taxpayer making an election under 
                this paragraph with respect to electricity produced and 
                sold at a facility during any period which, when 
                aggregated with all other periods for which a credit is 
                allowed under this section with respect to electricity 
                produced and sold at such facility, is in excess of 10 
                years.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2259]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  9:30 a.m., Thursday, February 18, 2010.

Place:  NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status:  The One item is open to the public.

Matter to be Considered: 
5300J Most Wanted List Transportation Safety Improvements, February 
2010 Progress Report and Update on Federal Issues.

News Media Contact:  Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour 
prior to the meeting for set up and seating.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Rochelle Hall at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, February 12, 2010.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candi Bing, (202) 314-6403.

    Dated: January 29, 2010.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-2259 Filed 1-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4557]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

PERMISSION FOR CERTAIN COMMITTEES TO SIT TODAY DURING THE 5-MINUTE RULE

  Mr. SAXTON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the following 
committees and their subcommittees be permitted to sit today while the 
House is meeting in the Committee on the Whole House under the 5-minute 
rule:
  The Committee on Agriculture; the Committee on Banking and Financial 
Services; the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities; the 
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight; the Committee on House 
Oversight; the Committee on International Relations; the Committee on 
the Judiciary; the Committee on Resources; and the Select Committee on 
Intelligence.
  Mr. Speaker, it is my understanding that the minority has been 
consulted, and that there is no objection to these requests.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from New Jersey?
  Mr. WISE. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to object, the gentleman 
is correct. The Democrat side has been consulted, and we have no 
objections.
  Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my reservation of objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Ewing). Is there objection to the 
request of the gentleman from New Jersey?
  There was no objection.
  

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 XQ-58A Valkyrie demonstrator completes inaugural flightPublished March 7, 2019
                        
                        
                        88 Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio  (AFNS) --**
                The XQ-58A Valkyrie demonstrator, a long-range, high subsonic unmanned air vehicle completed its inaugural flight March 5, 2019, at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona. The Air Force Research Laboratory partnered with Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems to develop the XQ-58A.This joint effort falls within the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Low Cost Attritable Aircraft Technology, or LCAAT, portfolio, which has the objective to break the escalating cost trajectory of tactically relevant aircraft. The objectives of the LCAAT initiative include designing and building UAS faster by developing better design tools and maturing and leveraging commercial manufacturing processes to reduce build time and cost.Developed for runway independence, the aircraft behaved as expected and completed 76 minutes of flight time. The time to first flight took a little over 2.5 years from contract award. The XQ-58A has a total of five planned test flights in two phases with objectives that include evaluating system functionality, aerodynamic performance and launch and recovery systems.“XQ-58A is the first example of a class of UAV that is defined by low procurement and operating costs while providing game changing combat capability,” said Doug Szczublewski, AFRL’s XQ-58A Program Manager.launch 



Air Force Research Laboratory 



XQ-58A 



Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems 



Low Cost Attritable Aircraft Technology 



LCAAT 



runway independence 



evaluating system functionality 



aerodynamic performance 



recovery systems 



XQ-58A Valkyrie demonstrator Related Links
        XQ-58A First Flight
                                
                                The XQ-58A Valkyrie demonstrator, a long-range, high subsonic unmanned air vehicle, completed its inaugural flight March 5, 2019 at Yuma Proving Grounds, Arizona. The Air Force Research Laboratory partnered with Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems to develop the XQ-58A.  (US Air Force video)
Order entered August 13, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00483 - CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V. NANCY BEGGS, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. DC - 11 - 14997 - M



### O RDER W e GRANT appellee’s August 11, 2015 first unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 14, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ CAROL ANN VASKO, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5014

______________________ Ap peal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:12

- cv

- 00370

- MBH, Judge Marian Blank Horn.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

The United States moves without opposition for an
exten sion of time to file its pri ncipal brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 14-5014 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 01/10/2014VASKO v. US 2

The motion is granted to the extent that the brief due date for the United States' brief is suspended, pending disposition of the appellant's motion to withdraw her previous brief and to subs titute another brief

.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s27 Case: 14-5014 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 01/10/2014
News United States Air Force
 Air Reserve TFSC call center agents take on 24-hour operationsPublished Aug. 3, 2018
                        
                        By Air Reserve Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Effective Aug. 1, the Air Reserve Personnel Center’s call center will centralize at the Air Force's Personnel Center call center at Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas. With this centralization, ARPC’s more than 1.3 million customers will now have access to Total Force Service Center call agents 24/7, 361 days a year by calling 1-800-525-0102, 210-565-0102 or DSN 665-0102. 
Centralization of the call center is expected to reduce call wait times and allow ARPC technicians to focus on executing personnel programs, including evaluations and retirements. The Center’s mission is to provide exceptional personnel services for the customer.
This centralization not only offers Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard and retired Airmen of all components extended hours of access, but also shorter wait times, quicker responses and a better customer service experience.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.personnel 



Reserve 



retiree 



guard 



evaluations 



ARPC 



center 



retirements 



call 



centralize 



wait times 



customer service 



Total Force Service Center 



AFPC
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-19-00160-CR 

________________________

RAYMOND JOSEPH JARAMILLO, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 320th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 56,256-D; Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon, Presiding 

 

August 19, 2019 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Pending before this court is the Motion for Voluntary Dismissal in Criminal Case of 

Appellant, Raymond Joseph Jaramillo, in which he moves to have his notice of appeal 

withdrawn and this appeal dismissed. In 2008, Appellant was convicted of aggravated 

assault with a deadly weapon,

1 sentenced to fifteen years confinement, and assessed a 

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2019).
2

$10,000 fine. We affirmed his conviction in Jaramillo v. State, No. 07-08-00148-CR, 2009 

Tex. App. LEXIS 1781, at *16 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Mar. 13, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., 

not designated for publication). In 2019, Appellant filed a Chapter 64 Motion for 

Comparison Testing and a motion for appointment of counsel in the trial court pursuant 

to Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On April 3, 2019, the trial court signed 

an Order Denying Defendant’s Motions for Comparison Testing and Appointment of 

Counsel. Appellant appealed from the trial court’s order, proceeding pro se.

As required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), the motion to dismiss is signed 

by Appellant.2 No decision of this court having been delivered, the motion is granted, and 

the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will 

issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

 

Do not publish.

2

In his motion to dismiss, Appellant requests leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus concerning 

the same subject matter as his appeal. He has filed the petition with this court. As leave of court is not 

required to commence an original proceeding under Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, his petition for writ of 

mandamus has been filed and is pending in cause number 07-19-00287-CV, In re Raymond Joseph 

Jamarillo, Relator.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Fits My Style Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nickolay, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Fits My Style Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Nickolay Kukekov |  | DATE:  November 5, 2012
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------



Nickolay Kukekov, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Fits My Style Inc. and will be retained by Fits My Style Inc. to be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick White,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 12, 2010/s/Patrick WhitePatrick
      WhiteChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5578-5579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Federal Advisory Committee; Quadrennial Defense Review 
Independent Panel

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Disestablishment of Federal advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense announced on October 1, 2009 (74 FR 
50781) that the Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel (hereafter 
referred to as the Panel), which was established by 10 U.S.C. 118f, 
would operate under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act of 1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b). The Department has determined that the Panel is a 
legislative advisory committee that works for and reports to the 
Legislative Branch; therefore, the Department is withdrawing the 
Panel's charter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Freeman, Deputy Committee 
Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-601-6128.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: After further consideration the Office of 
the Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, in 
consultation with the Office of the General Counsel for the Department 
of Defense, has determined that the Panel is in fact a legislative 
advisory committee; that is, it works for and reports to the 
Legislative Branch.
    Therefore, the Panel is not subject to the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 or the Government in the 
Sunshine Act of 1976. Accordingly, the Department of Defense is 
withdrawing the Panel's charter that was filed with the Committee 
Management Secretariat for the General Services Administration, the 
congressional oversight committees and the Library of Congress.
    The removal of the Panel's charter and its status under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act of 1972 has no

[[Page 5579]]

impact on the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 118f, as amended, that require 
the establishment of the Panel and its subsequent recommendations to 
Congress.

    Dated: January 29, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-2258 Filed 2-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 10.2


 


Section 11.4(a) of The
Valspar Corporation 2009 Omnibus Equity Plan is amended and restated as follows:”


 




	11.4	Effect of Retirement or Other
                                         Termination 
	 	 	 
		(a)	In the event of a Participant’s Retirement (as defined below),
if and to the extent provided in the agreement evidencing any Incentive described in this sentence, (1) all outstanding Restricted
Stock Awards, Stock Options, SARs and Restricted Stock Units previously granted to the Participant will become 100% vested, (2)
the Participant shall be entitled to exercise any outstanding Stock Options and SARs for the remainder of the original term of
the Stock Option or SAR, provided that if the Participant violates his/her Non-Compete Agreement (as defined below), all of his/her
unexercised Stock Options and SARs shall terminate immediately and be forfeited to the Company and (3) the Participant will become
entitled to a distribution of any Performance Award as described in Section 10.9. For purposes of this Plan, commencing with Awards
granted on or after September 30, 2014, “Retirement” means the termination of employment with the Company or a Subsidiary
for any reason other than death, Disability or Termination for Cause (as defined below) at any time after the Participant has attained
the age of fifty-five years (or a different age specified for a Participant for any Incentive), provided, that (i) the Participant
has executed a Non-Compete Agreement (as defined below), (ii) the Participant has signed and delivered the Company’s standard
release of claims, and the period in which it may be revoked expired not later than thirty days after the date of termination,
(iii) the Participant has been in the employ of the Company or a Subsidiary continuously for a period of at least three years on
the date of termination, and (iv) Participant has provided written notice to the Company that Participant is considering retirement,
in accordance with any policies for such notices that the Committee may develop from time to time, at least one year prior to the
date of termination. “Non-Compete Agreement” means an agreement not to directly or indirectly render services (including
consulting or research) for a period of three years to any person or business organization that is engaged in the development,
manufacture and sale of any product, process or service (including any component thereof or research to develop information useful
in connection with a product or service) that is being designed, developed, assembled, manufactured, marketed or sold by anyone
other than the Company and which is of the same general type, performs similar functions, competes with or is used for the same
purposes as a product of the Company or a Subsidiary. “Termination for Cause” means the termination of employment with
the Company or a Subsidiary as a result of an illegal act, gross insubordination or willful violation of a policy of the Company
or a Subsidiary by a Participant.