alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 5, 2019 t0225

Order 

Clerk

March 5, 2019

157829

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157829

COA: 340555

Kent CC: 10-002817-FH

ABSOLEM STEVEN-JAMAR THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2018 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 276 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 276

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2013

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12423, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section, reinstate the 
license and extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of project works to the end of 
the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E977]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      TRIBUTE TO CPL BRUCE BARDELL

                                 ______

                          HON. JOHN D. DINGELL

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to a 
distinguished police officer who is retiring as a hero from the Allen 
Park, MI, Police Department. Cpl. Bruce Bardell was honored last month 
by the city he has served with bravery and skill for 29 years.
  Since being wounded by a gunshot fired by a fleeing felon in 1978, 
Corporal Bardell has undergone four major surgeries, the most recent of 
which was in January of this year. I would like to share with my 
colleagues a little about the incident that led to this injury because 
it reveals much about the character of this officer, and the other 
officers on the Allen Park police force.
  On June 3, 1978, Corporal Bardell was among the officers dispatched 
when a larceny was reported in the north end of the city. The suspects 
fled in a car. After the police gave chase, the suspects abandoned 
their vehicle and escaped through back yards on foot in the dark. When 
a resident reported a prowler, Officer Bardell responded. Upon arriving 
to the area of the report, he viewed a shadowy figure darting in a 
nearby yard, and gave chase on foot. Officer Bardell was surprised by a 
second suspect hiding behind a garage, who fired two shots at point 
blank range, striking Officer Bardell in the abdomen. He managed to 
return fire, striking the suspect, who was immobilized until other 
officers arrived on the scene.
  Officer Bardell returned to duty following his recovery from his 
injuries, and I am pleased to be able to report that his assailant is 
still imprisoned, serving a 60- to 100-year term. However, I must also 
note that Corporal Bardell has suffered continuing health problems as a 
result of this craven criminal act. Despite these problems, he has 
continued to serve with distinction and honor.
  For his years of dedicated service to the people of Allen Park, for 
his bravery in the face of great danger, and for his record as a good 
and faithful citizen, I call upon my colleagues in the House to join me 
in saluting this great American.

                          ____________________
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11102 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE HERNANDEZ-JASSO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-67-Y

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Hernandez-Jasso appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). He argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to simple reentry under § 1326(a) but that he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a felony conviction pursuant to § 1326(b)(1). His argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. VasquezOlvera , 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).No. -2-
AFFIRMED.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Change through diversity, inclusion: Little Rock AFB establishes Airmen’s forum

              - Published  Dec. 13, 2020
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Isaiah Miller                                                    
              - 19th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, Ark. (AFNS) --  **
**Little Rock Air Force Base** is committed to delivering a diverse workforce that embraces a variety of perspectives and recognizes the talents of all of its Airmen. In direct support of this, the base has established a Diversity and Inclusion Airmen’s Forum.The mission of the forum is to assemble a council of Airmen from diverse ranks, backgrounds and communities, focused on forging organizational cultures in which trust, empowerment and accountability is melded with the warrior ethos; where diversity is valued as a personnel readiness multiplier and each individual has the opportunity to exert their maximum potential to help one another.“The Diversity and Inclusion Airmen’s Forum is an awesome initiative that gives folks the opportunity to have some hard-hitting and sometimes difficult conversations in a safe and controlled environment,” said Tech. Sgt. Langston Anthony, the forum’s co-chairperson. “The forum removes any barriers or obstacles from Airmen having the opportunity to weigh in on decisions made at the base level with relation to diversity and inclusion.”The 19th and 314th Airlift Wing command chiefs assisted the forum by providing guidance and mentorship, as well as helping facilitate the forum’s goals as they move forward.“This is about leveraging unique strengths, perspectives and experiences to help solve complex issues,: said Chief Master Sgt. Steven Hart, 19th AW command chief. “The collective intelligence of these professionals of varying backgrounds will inherently bring out new and innovative ideas, which is vitally important to our mission.”This forum is currently composed of Airmen between the ranks of E-2 to E-9, O-1 to O-4, and various levels of Defense Department civilians to provide a well-rounded and full-spectrum of experience, both personally and professionally.“In order to create change, our first step is to look at ourselves to see where we can change our own mindset and perspective,” said Airman 1st Class Hajjii Frederick, Diversity and Inclusion Forum co-chairperson. “The challenge is a great one, but I believe no matter what my rank is, I bring a lot of personal experience to the table.”The vision of the forum is to foster an inclusive environment where individuals are respected and valued for their differences and abilities, that is not hindered by prejudicial barriers, stereotypes or restrictions.“It is an honor to be a part of this,” said Chief Master Sgt. John Chilcote, 314th AW command chief. “We have an opportunity to make meaningful changes through the recommendations provided to us from the forum.”

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceAMCAir Mobility CommandLittle Rock AFBdiversityinclusionforumculture
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4798]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               TIME WARP

  (Mr. CHRYSLER asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. CHRYSLER. Mr. Speaker, my colleagues on the other side of the 
aisle are caught in a time warp.
  They are still thinking like the Congress of old, where through the 
magic of baseline budgeting, Democrats could claim they were cutting 
spending when actually they were spending more than ever.
  Now they come to the floor and claim that Republicans are cutting 
Medicare, when the cold, hard facts are just the opposite.
  As you can see by this chart, the per capita expenditure in Medicare 
will increase from $4,700 to $6,300 over the next 7 years.
  In Democrat parlance, that is a cut, but to most Americans that is a 
significant increase.
  Coupled with our reforms, which will weed out waste and fraud, we 
will protect, improve, and preserve Medicare far into the next century.
  Mr. Speaker, House Democrats who come to the floor today will 
continue to attack Republicans for cutting Medicare. But as this chart 
shows, the truth is far different from the Democrat version of reality.

                          ____________________
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3726

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Mario Deshawn Stevenson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo

____________

 Submitted: April 26, 2017

Filed: May 1, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mario Stevenson directly appeals the below-Guidelines-range sentence the

district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug charge. His counsel has

1

The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the Northern District of Iowa.
moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable and that the

district court should have varied downward even further. Stevenson has not filed a

pro se brief.

We conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable

sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc)

(describing appellate review of sentencing decisions); see also United States v.

McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that when district court has

varied below Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that court abused its

discretion in not varying downward further). In addition, we have independently

reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1500

ROBIN GOMES; CECILIA GOMES; Y.G.,

Petitioners,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A70-529-717)

Submitted: November 17, 2006 Decided: December 19, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Parker Waggaman, GELL & GELL, New York, New York, for Petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt,

Senior Litigation Counsel, Tracy Greer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
*

Gomes’s wife, Cecilia, and child are derivative petitioners.

Both are natives and citizens of India.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robin Gomes, a native and citizen of Bangladesh,*

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s

denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for asylum , an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Gomes fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. The standard for withholding of removal is more

stringent than that for asylum eligibility; having failed to

qualify for asylum, Gomes also cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430

(1987); Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). 

Gomes also asserts on appeal that public policy, as

reflected in the International Religious Freedom Act, contravenes

return of a Christian to a non-Christian country. Our review

discloses that this claim was not raised before the Board and was

therefore not properly exhausted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d) (2000).
- 3 -

As a result, we lack jurisdiction to review it. Asika v. Ashcroft,

362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1049

(2005). Likewise, Gomes failed to raise a CAT claim before the

Board. And given that Gomes failed to set forth any argument in

his brief before this court with regard to the denial of CAT

relief, we find that he has abandoned that claim on appeal. See

Yousefi v. INS, 260 F.3d 318, 326 (4th Cir. 2001); Edwards v. City

of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. P.B.

June 25, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
RedactedNantongAmendment EX 10.1






Exhibit 10.1


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
Redacted portions are indicated by [***]1 
 
AMENDMENT TO


CHEMICAL CELLULOSE AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT is effective as of December 31, 2014, and is entered into by and between Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co., Ltd., (“Buyer”) and Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC (“Seller”), collectively, the “Parties.”


WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Chemical Cellulose Agreement with the effective date of January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement and revise certain terms contained therein.


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


		
	1.
	Article 1 of the Agreement is revised to extend the term through December 31, 2015.




		
	2.
	Article 3(a) of the Agreement is amended to add the following annual requirement:




[***]


3.  Article 4(a) of the Agreement shall be amended by adding the following sentence to the end:


“For calendar year 2015, the payment terms shall be [***].”


4.    Article 4(b) shall be deleted effective January 1, 2015 and replaced in its entirety with the following:


“The price for Product purchased during calendar year 2015 shall be [***].”


5.    Article 5 of the Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:


(5)    [***]:  


[***].


[***].



	
			
	 
	 
	 




1 [***] Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.






Except as amended above, all remaining provisions the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and year first above written.




	
		
	NANTONG CELLULOSE FIBERS
CO., LTD.






By:   _/s/ Liu Jingru______________
Name: Liu Jingru
Title: Chairman, Board of Directors
	RAYONIER PERFORMANCE FIBERS, LLC








By:   _/s/ Paul Boynton__________
Name: Paul Boynton
Title:  President
News United States Air Force
 Grey Wolf begins testingPublished Feb. 19, 2020
                        
                        By Samuel King Jr.
                        
                        
                        Air Force Materiel Command Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force’s newest helicopter, the MH-139A Grey Wolf, completed its first combined test flight, Feb. 11.
With a Boeing pilot in command, this test flight allowed the Air Force its first in-flight look at the capabilities of the aircraft. The flight also made Maj. Zach Roycroft, 413th Flight Test Squadron lead test pilot for the program, the first Air Force pilot to fly Grey Wolf.
“This first flight with Boeing was a critical step for the MH-139A program and allows us to establish a foundation for government testing,” Roycroft said.
Boeing completed extensive flight-testing on Grey Wolf to satisfy Federal Aviation Administration requirements before the introduction of mixed contractor and Air Force crews. The MH-139A program should complete initial military ground testing later this month.
“This flight represents a tremendous amount of work and we are all very excited to see it happen,” said Andrew Whitten, MH-139A flight chief, who was also on the flight.
The MH-139A is set to replace the Air Force’s UH-1N Huey fleet. The new helicopter closes the capability gaps of the UH-1N in the areas of speed, range, endurance, payload and survivability in support of the command’s intercontinental ballistic missile missions. Other mission capabilities include civil search and rescue, airlift support, National Capital Region missions, as well as survival school and test support.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Material Command 



AFMC 



Eglin Air Force Base 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



Eglin AFB 



413th Flight Test Squadron 



MH-139A Grey Wolf 



UH-1N Huey
Exhibit 35.1





AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance Officer of American Honda Finance Corporation,
a California corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the
"Servicer" and "Sponsor") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of May
25, 2011 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2011-2 Owner Trust,
as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2012, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                            

| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 1stday of June, 2012.



| |                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | _/s/ Paul C. Honda_________________________                
| | Paul C. Honda                                              
| | Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and Compliance Officer
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6127]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      ORDER FOR STAR PRINT--S. 735

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that S. 735 be 
star printed to reflect the following changes which I send to the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 43309-1-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### Rosalie Stevenson, et al., *Appellants,*v. King County, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-09351-0, Donald D. Haley, J., entered June 12, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Cox and Ellington, JJ.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PIERSON SPRINGSTEAD.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.