alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Update: Air Force puts future basing plans for Davis-Monthan AFB, Nellis AFB on hold pending NDAA outcomePublished July 23, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Department of the Air Force announced today it is pausing plans related to aircraft basing decisions at **Davis-Monthan Air Force Base**, Arizona and **Nellis AFB**, Nevada that are dependent upon the requirement to retire 42 **A-10 Thunderbolt II**s.
The announcement comes as the department awaits congressional action that will be reflected in fiscal year 2022’s National Defense Authorization Act.
In support of modernization efforts, the Air Force announced June 30 for its plans to establish a center of excellence for close air support and rescue missions at Davis-Monthan AFB by transferring the A-10 Thunderbolt II and **HH-60 Pave Hawk** weapons schools and test squadrons to the Arizona base beginning in fiscal year 2022 – a move contingent on congressional approval of the President Biden’s budget request to retire 42 older A-10 aircraft.
In addition, the movement of these squadrons and personnel from Nellis AFB would free additional range and base capacity necessary to test and train warfighters in fifth-generation aircraft and establish Nellis AFB as a fifth-generation center of excellence.
According to Air Force officials, however, these plans are on hold pending the outcome of congressional decisions in the FY-22 NDAA.
The Department of the Air Force’s fiscal year 2022 budget request is seeking the retirement of 42 A-10 aircraft, 35 of which are at Davis-Monthan AFB. Pending congressional approval, the funds made available from retiring these older A-10s would create the fiscal and manpower flexibility required to design and field the future force needed to meet combatant commander requirements.
Although the Air Force is seeking to retire 42 A-10s, the service plans to modernize and keep 218 combat-capable A-10s within the fighter fleet into the 2030s. The A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced Continuation Kitting wing replacement contract, which was awarded in August 2019, included the purchase of wings for 218 aircraft. The Air Force has invested $880 million in A-10 re-winging and avionics modernization efforts.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



basing plans 



Davis-Monthan AFB 



nellis afb 



National Defense Authorization Act 



A-10 Thunderbolt II 



HH-60 Pave Hawk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4555]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        REPUBLICANS AND MEDICARE

  (Mr. RICHARDSON asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. RICHARDSON. Mr. Speaker, the Republicans are having a hard time 
explaining to 35 million Americans who rely on Medicare that their 
benefits will be cut to pay for a $350 billion tax break for the 
wealthy.
  Now, Republican leaders are attacking the President because he 
refuses to join them in slashing Medicare to pay for their unjust tax 
break. Republicans also fail to mention that the President has in fact 
extended the life of the Medicare fund in legislation that Republicans 
voted against last year.
  The truth is that Republican cuts to Medicare would make the average 
Medicare recipient cough up $900 more each year out of their own 
pockets.
  In my State of New Mexico alone, 200,000 Americans will be forced to 
reduce their food budget or their heating costs to pay for this unfair 
tax cut.
  Mr. Speaker, the President is right. We should favor Medicare reform 
that protects benefits for Americans, but cuts in Medicare should not 
pay for a tax break for the wealthy. The American people will not be 
fooled.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5558]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    ORDER FOR RECORD TO REMAIN OPEN

  Mr. GORTON. I ask unanimous consent that the Record remain open until 
2 p.m. today for the introduction of bills and statements.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
#### TOWNSHIP OF DOVER v. LAURENCE HECKER.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Cross-Petition for certification denied.
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE CRIMINAL DIST RICT COURT, MAGISTRA TE COURT OF BEXAR CO UNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 10, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Ex parte Antwaun Deon Robinson, Appellant(s)

V.

No. 04

- 14

- 00512

- CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014W0146

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

WH EREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the C ourt of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on February 9, 2015

. KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Cardinal Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kevin JonesKevin JonesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





May 21, 2014





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cardinal Resources Inc. and will be retained by Cardinal Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1827

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Dustin Wayne Rogers

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

 Submitted: April 12, 2017 

Filed: April 17, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Dustin Wayne Rogers pled guilty plea to child-pornography charges. On

appeal, he challenges the sentence that the district court imposed. Rogers’s counsel

1

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the

1

Southern District of Iowa.
movesto withdraw, and in a brief submitted under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), he argues that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. Having

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The district court imposed a sentence below the applicable advisoryGuidelines

range after discussing, in some detail, the nature and seriousness of the offenses,

Rogers’s personal characteristics, difficult childhood, and admirable military service,

and considered other appropriate sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). This

court finds that the sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See United States

v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (discussing abuse of discretion);

United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681, 684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (“[W]here a

district court has sentenced a defendant below the advisory guidelines range, it is

nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in not varying downward

still.”). An independent review of the record reveals no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988). 

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-2-
#### MAYO S. SISLER AND MAYO S. SISLER AND APT-TO-ACRES, INC. v. COURIER-NEWS CO.

May 30, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 199 *N.J.Super.*307)
News United States Air Force
 Cyber career field discusses new training baselinePublished July 29, 2021
                        
                        By Senior Airman Kimberly L. Mueller
                        
                        
                        81st Training Wing Public Affairs
                **KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE, Miss. (AFNS) --**
                The 81st Training Support Squadron hosted the Cyber Operations Specialty Training and Requirements Team conference at **Keesler Air Force Base**, July 19-23.
“The conference was held to ensure the upcoming evolution from cyberspace support to cyberspace operations is a smooth transition, eliminate training deficiencies and maintain the health and welfare of the entire career field at the highest standard,” said Staff Sgt. Matthew Storer, 81st TRSS cyberspace support force development noncommissioned officer in charge. “It impacts the entirety of the cyberspace support career field by creating baseline requirements for training.”
The conference included cyberspace support career field managers, functional managers from each of the 10 major commands, including Guard and Reserve, representation from **Space Force** Cyber, technical training school houses and qualifications flight to determine the training requirements for the most elite cyber operations troops going forward.
“The STRT and Training Planning Team meetings are an essential part of the Air Force, and encompasses each career field, major command and learning program’s representatives,” said Chief Master Sgt. Victor Cordero Jr., Air Force cyberspace support career field manager. “This is a historic conference, advancing the **Career Field Education and Training Plan**, future training requirements and establishing formal training requirements for **Air Education and Training Command** aligned to the new transition.”
As a result of the conference, a partnership was formed between **Air Combat Command** and AETC to reimagine training that works the way Airmen work in order to develop the 30,000 total force cyber Airman capable of conducting the build, secure, protect and defend mission on the Air Force network enterprise.
“Future conflicts will be fought and won in cyber, and we need to develop and deliver a mission-ready cyber force armed for tomorrow’s fight,” said Chief Master Sgt. Patricia Ford, ACC support functional manager. “The capability of our cyber Airmen will be the deciding factor between mission success and mission failure.”FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Education and Training Command 



AETC 



Air Combat Command 



ACC 



Keesler AFB 



81st Training Support Squadron 



81st TRSS 



Specialty Training and Requirements Team 



STRT 



cyberspace 



support 



operations 



new training
No. D-699.

#### In re Disbarment of Hopkins.

It is ordered that Richard J. Hopkins, of Silver Spring, Md., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michelle Rico, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Yanex Group, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2016 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Yanex Group, Inc.  Dated:  November 4, 2016/s/ Michelle RicoMichelle RicoPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6386

HAMMEL J. CLARK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DENISE GELSINGER; LIEUTENANT LARRY C. BENNETT; CO II ALICIA A. CARTWRIGHT; SERGEANT JASON A. DADDYSMAN; WARDEN RICHARD J. GRAHAM; SERGEANT THOMAS MENGES , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv
- 00921

- TDC )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Hammel J. Clark , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Hammel J. Clark seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not
al l , of Clark’s claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Clark seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or co llateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proc ess.
DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1804

MARY TUCKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY,

INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-95-426-3-MU)

Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Evans Johnson, Brian

Christian Lambert, KILPATRICK STOCKTON, L.L.P., Charlotte, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's civil

suit arising under § 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act,

29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. American

Telephone & Telegraph, Co., No. CA-95-426-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 9,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Document Security Systems, inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip Jones,
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: May
14, 2009
 
 
 /s/Philip
Jones
 Philip
Jones
 Acting
Chief Financial Officer
 (Vice
President of Finance)
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Document Security Systems, Inc and will be retained by Document Security
Systems, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 BLUE: Cyber in Contested DomainPublished May 26, 2020
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                As America's adversaries evolve, the Air Force has to be ready to withstand a digital 'sucker punch'. To mitigate this threat, cybersecurity is being integrated into the development of all new programs from the start.





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Air Force We Need (AFWN) 



AFBlue 



USAF 



Drive Innovation(DI) 



Cyber Resiliency 



Contested Domain 



CROWS 



Cyber Resiliency Office For Weapon Systems 



F35 



F15 



weapon systems 



Air Force 



United States Air Force 



Domain Dominance 



cyber
[DO N OT PUBLISH]

IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 12 43 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock et No. 9 :1 1- cr-8 01 95 -KLR-1
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,
Plai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,

ve rs us ROBERT DENMARK, a.k .a. Mark Ant ho ny W hi te , a.k .a. Darri ck Maynard Scru b, a.k .a. Bry an Ju ni or

Ro bi ns on , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Dece m be r 14 , 20 12 )
Befo re TJ OFLAT, PRYOR an d M ARTIN, Cir cu it Ju dg es
. PER CURI AM:

Case: 12-12430 Date Filed: 12/14/2012 Page: 1 of 2Pet er Bi rch , ap po in te d co un se l fo r Ro be rt Den m ark in th is di rect cri mi na l

ap pe al , ha s m ov ed to wit hd raw fro m fu rth er rep res en ta ti on of th e ap pe ll an t an d fil ed

a br ie f pu rs ua nt to And er

s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8, 87 S.Ct

. 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 49 3 (1 96 7)

. Our in de pe nd en t rev ie w of th e en ti re reco rd rev eal s th at co un se l’s

as se ss m en t of th e rel at iv e m eri t of th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t

ex am in at io n of th e en ti re reco rd rev eal s no arg ua bl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n
to wit hd raw is GRANTED , an d Den mar k ’s co nv ic ti on an d se nt en ce are AFFIRMED

.

2

Case: 12-12430 Date Filed: 12/14/2012 Page: 2 of 2
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A68 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|     |
|-----|
|     |  |
| Re: | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the “Issuer”) |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the  Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |

|                           |
|---------------------------|
|                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Dated: March 6, 2017 |   |   |   | BY |   | /s/ Seth Taube |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   | Seth Taube |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

|                    |
|--------------------|
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|               |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| March 6, 2017 |   |   |   | By |   | /s/ Christopher M. Mathieu |
|               |   |   |   |   |   | Christopher M. Mathieu |
|               |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |