alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, James A. Israel, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2011 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 
|                          | JOHN   DEERE OWNER TRUST 2011 |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                          |                          |   |   |
|                          |                          | By:   John Deere Capital Corporation |   |
|                          |                          | (Servicer) |   |
|                          |                          |   |   |   |
|                          |                          |   |   |   |
|                          |                          |   |   |   |
| Date:   January 24, 2014 |                          | By: | */s/ James A. Israel* |   |
|                          |                          |   | James   A. Israel |
|                          |                          |   | President |
|                               |                               |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E892]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   PI KAPPA DELTA NATIONAL TOURNAMENT

                                 ______

                            HON. IKE SKELTON

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                          Monday, May 1, 1995
  Mr. SKELTON. Mr. Speaker, today I wish to recognize an outstanding 
group of students from Central Missouri State University's forensics 
team. The forensics team recently won the national 39th biannual Pi 
Kappa Delta National Tournament. The tournament was held from March 22-
25, 1995 at Louisiana State University in Shreveport.
  Pi Kappa Delta is a national honorary fraternity that symbolizes the 
benefits of a forensics education. Twenty-three students represented 
Central Missouri State University in the competition. The team placed 
first in debate and second in individual events, winning 32 individual 
event awards. This is the first national championship in the team's 73-
year history.
  I know that the Members of this body join me in congratulating the 
Central Missouri State University forensics team for their 
accomplishment. The students on the forensics team should be applauded 
for all the hard work, dedication, and perseverance it took to win the 
tournament.

                          ____________________
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 26, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 26, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A23I0015. WILLIAM RIDLEY v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18CR1781 18CR1783
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from the Wah Chang facility, Albany, Oregon, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Wah Chang.                    

*Location:*                         Albany, Oregon.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All employees who worked in any buildings.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         Operational period from January 1, 1971 through December 31, 1972, and the residual radioactivity period from January 1, 1973 through October 31, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV*.                    

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-22846 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of the meeting on October 19-21, 2010, is to review new start research and development projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 19 (from 9 a.m. to 5                               ( print page 55779)                            p.m.), Wednesday, October 20 (from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Thursday, October 21, 2010 (from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.).                    

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the SERDP Office Conference Center, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 804, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Jonathan Bunger, SERDP Office, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA, or by telephone at (703) 696-2126.

Dated: September 8, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-22800 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Rolando Escajeda, Jr., * From the 161st District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. B-21-0424-CR

Vs. No. 11-21-00282-CR * August 4, 2022

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4514]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          REPUBLICANS HAVE PROMISED MORE THAN THEY CAN DELIVER

  (Mr. MILLER of California asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. MILLER of California. Mr. Speaker, Members of the House, the 
senior citizens of this country should be deeply concerned about the 
rumblings that they hear on the Republican side of the aisle.
  The Republicans have now come to face the fact that they cannot give 
tax cuts to the wealthy, balance the budget, and preserve Medicare, so 
now they are devising a plan by which they can make the cuts in 
Medicare to provide for the tax cuts for the wealthy.
  I think we have to ask ourselves, is this really what America 
expected at the time of election, that we would pass on massive tax 
cuts to the wealthiest people in this country and we would do it at the 
expense of the Medicare plan, the health safety net for millions of 
seniors who have nowhere other to turn for health care in this country? 
I am saying to the senior citizens of this country, keep your eyes open 
and your ears tuned to the news waves because what the Republicans have 
in store is nothing but bad for the Medicare system of this country.
  If they do not do that, what they have in store is to add another 
$150 billion in budget cuts to $1 out of every $3 that the Federal 
Government now spends, so they have run up against the cruel facts that 
they have promised more than they can deliver, and it looks like the 
beneficiaries of that will be the wealthy of the Nation, and the 
victims will be the health care of the senior citizens.

                          ____________________
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 128037(76) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128037 COA: 250140 Wayne CC: 02-011058-01 FREDDY KATO-HARRIS LOVE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of August 30, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
#### VERA McMILLON v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KEAN COLLEGE.

Dec. 10, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 33.2




Indenture Trustee’s Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria




MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE




Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:





Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)





Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).





Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the “Period”).





With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:


·
The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




·
The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.









CITIBANK, N.A.



/s/ Karen Montbach

By:  Karen Montbach

Its:  Managing Director



Dated: February 28, 2012
<PAGE>

                                August 14, 2000



Mr. Karl E. Elers
8911 Limerick
Houston, Texas  77024

     Re:     Agreement for Consulting Services dated May 1, 1999,
             as amended effective January 1, 2000

Dear Mr. Elers:

This letter will serve as our mutual consent to amend the above-referenced
agreement regarding services as Acting Chief Executive Officer such that the
amount payable monthly thereunder effective July 1, 2000 shall be $12,000 per
month.  Please sign below in the space provided and return the original of
this letter to Greg Etter.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD COMPANY

                                       /s/ John A. Keyes

                                       John A. Keyes
                                       President and Chief Operating Officer



AGREED:



/s/ Karl E. Elers
---------------------------------------
Karl E. Elers
Date:   August 30, 2000
      ---------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-14-00136-CR

 04-14-00137-CR

 04-14-00138-CR

 04-14-00139-CR

Billy Edward GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 12-CR-611, 12-CR-615, 12-CR-613 & 12-CR-609

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 7, 2014

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed the sentences in Appeal Nos. 04-14-00136-CR, 04-14-00138-CR, 

and 04-14-00139-CR on October 30, 2013, and signed the order being appealed in Appeal No. 04-

14-00137-CR on October 31, 2013. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Because 

appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was 

November 29, 2013, for Appeal Nos. 04-14-00136-CR, 04-14-00138-CR, and 04-14-00139-CR, 

and December 2, 2013, for Appeal No. 04-14-00137-CR. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice 
04-14-00136-CR, 04-14-00137-CR, 04-14-00138-CR & 04-14-00139-CR

of appeal was not filed until February 25, 2014, and the record shows the notice of appeal was not 

mailed until February 18, 2014. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the 

notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. 

On March 18, 2014, we ordered appellant to file a written response on or before April 17, 

2014, showing cause why the appeals should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant 

did not file a response. Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, and no timely motion 

for extension of time was filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeals. See Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 

S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions). 

Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

- 2 -
Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_01.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_02.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_03.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_04.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_05.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_06.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_07.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_08.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_09.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_10.jpg  Rick Howard Employ Agree_final_signed_Page_11.jpg
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         792,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,357,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    169,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,690,000
<PP&E>                                       4,201,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,425,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,513,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,623,000
<BONDS>                                      1,675,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    444,000
<COMMON>                                       120,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     651,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,513,000
<SALES>                                      9,799,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,799,000
<CGS>                                        8,069,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,069,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                434,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            424,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   424,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT GILMORE.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.