# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AFRL 'x-ray vision' tool to reduce costs, time for 3D part qualification

              - Published  March 11, 2021
              -                             By Mary Pacinda                                                    
              - Air Force Research Laboratory

**WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --  **
The **Air Force Research Laboratory**, in partnership with the Materials Solutions Network at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source of Cornell University, has developed a tool that can look directly inside of and instantaneously inspect the structure of composite components while they are being manufactured. This new technology uses a combination of phase contrast imaging and micro-beam scanning to produce real-time X-ray scattering images of the component during and post production. The process is expected to save the Air Force millions of dollars in qualification and certification of composite parts used in advanced unmanned aerial vehicles and satellite systems.“Imagine having Superman’s X-ray vision,” said Dr. Hilmar Koerner, research lead of the Polymer Matrix Composites, Materials and Processes Research Team of AFRL’s Structural Materials Division. “You could go to a manufacturing floor and be able to see through parts and see defects ‘on the fly,’ while they are being produced. If you could see the defect, you could pull the part out of production before it actually gets in a system and causes the system to fail, or (you can) adjust the processing parameters to correct for it.”In routine manufacturing, a quality control inspector currently has to wait until a part is completely formed to examine it and see if it has defects. This new technology allows the continuous inspection of a critical part while it is being created, looking for voids or inconsistencies in the material as the part takes shape, in particular during an additive manufacturing process.Although still in its infancy, additive manufacturing (or “3D printing”) is expected to change the way machined parts will be made in the near future, a change that is under way even now. Instead of being made by processes like stamping, forging, welding or hand lay-up, parts such as wings for drones will be “printed.” That is, they will be built up layer by layer from molten material forced through nozzles. Those layers eventually stack up and form a pattern that takes the shape of the desired aircraft component. (Think of sugar icing forced from a piping tool to make decorations on a birthday cake—only a bit more exacting and complicated!)“Right now what we can look at is on a small scale,” Koerner said when asked how big an area of a component can currently be inspected with phase contrast imaging (also called radiography). “We have a window of a few millimeters by a few millimeters (in which) we can see defects right away. And it’s not instant yet, but it is a huge step toward instant. It takes us a few minutes to a half an hour to see what’s going on and see how well the carbon fibers are aligned in a 3D-printed composite.“Five to ten years ago when we did these experiments it would take as long as six months to analyze the X-ray image data. Now it takes less than an hour,” he said.For this process, Koerner’s team uses X-rays that cannot be used on the manufacturing floor. “We are using X-rays a million times stronger than what are used in a doctor’s office.”The team is conducting its experiments at a test facility at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source, which produces the high-intensity, high-energy X-ray beams. The experiments are carried out inside a hutch with thick, lead-shielded walls.“You cannot be in the hutch when the experiment is being run,” Koerner said. “The X-rays being used are so strong you could look through someone quite literally within a second. You can watch it happen that fast in real time. It’s not like when a doctor takes an X-ray exposure and spends time developing it. Here we have real-time images on a monitor. The X-ray beam comes in, hits the sample (as it’s being built up layer by layer) and creates an image behind it within fractions of a second.”To take advantage of this kind of intimate inspection, an extrusion-based 3D printer is mounted in the path of the X-ray beam. “As layer by layer (of material) builds up the part, we can watch the structure and any defects in real time as it’s printed,” said Koerner.Once the part has been printed, another inspection technique uses a micro-beam (a very narrow X-ray beam, 1 to 5 microns in diameter) to scan across the sample. This process takes longer, about two to three hours. “You then stitch all the images together into a map,” Koerner explained . “The map of data from more than a quarter million images tells you everything about the sample down to the nanometer scale (a millionth of the thickness of a human hair). So now you know everything about your part, starting from the actual printing to the final part, including nanoparticle alignment.”According to Koerner, one inherent problem in 3D printing is consistency from part to part. “3D printing is basically creating a part with defects,” he said. “We won’t ever reduce the defects to zero.”So, the challenge becomes not to eliminate defects, but to print each part with the same defects all the time. “You want to make sure the defects are always in the same place so the performance (of the part) is predictable,” Koerner said.The X-ray inspection sees those “consistent” defects, but more importantly, it also spots unexpected defects like voids. “That’s one of the goals,” Koerner said. When a new defect suddenly appears, the team knows that something has gone wrong and something needs to be fixed. “The angle of the nozzle may need to be changed to get rid of gaps. Or we may have to change the nozzle design or the printing parameters.”AFRL invested about $7 million to build two X-ray beamlines at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source in 2019. “The goal of these two beamlines,” Koerner said, “is to work with our industrial partners to work to solve Defense Department challenges to create composites faster, stronger and better.”The money invested also supports the staff that runs the two beamlines. Having a staff of experts onsite means the companies that are using the facility don’t have to provide their own expertise.

FSUSAFAFAir ForceAFMCAir Force Materiel CommandAFRLAir Force Research LaboratoryWright-Patterson AFBX-raytechnology