alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 11317 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DANIEL LEIJA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 53

- 2

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Leija has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Leija h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11317 Document: 00512751448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 11317

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-11317 Document: 00512751448 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Emerald Bioscience, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Cesario, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, that, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                |
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Emerald Bioscience, Inc., and will be retained by Emerald Bioscience, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

| */s/ Doug Cesario*                                                                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Doug Cesario

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

May 29, 2019 |        |
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. FKA CST
      Entertainment, Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 10QSB for the period ending December
      31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and Principle
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





Dated:
      August 21, 2008





/S/
                Robert MatthewsName:
                Robert MatthewsTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KENNETH L. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3045

[April 19, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Peter M. Evans, Judge; L.T. Case No. 1998CF008086.

Kenneth Lee Jones, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables
LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Pacific Drilling S.A.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-180485) on Form S-8 of Pacific Drilling S.A. of our reports datedFebruary 28, 2013 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Drilling S.A. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pacific Drilling S.A., as amended. We did not audit the financial statements of Transocean Pacific Drilling Inc. (TPDI – a 50% owned unconsolidated investee company). The Company’sinvestment in TPDI at December 31, 2011 was $0, and its equity in earnings of TPDI was $18,955,000 and $56,307,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The financial statements of TPDI were audited by otherauditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for TPDI, is based solely on the report of other auditors. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas

December 20, 2013
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2778 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling up to $10,000,000 

for information on the kidnapping and murder of James Foley and 

Steven Sotloff. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. 

NELSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling 

up to $10,000,000 for information on the kidnapping 

and murder of James Foley and Steven Sotloff. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

5 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

6 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

7 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re8 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

9 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2778 IS

1 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

2 aiding or abetting in the commission of the kidnapping 

3 and murder of James Foley or Steven Sotloff. 

4 (b) LIMITATION.—The total amount of rewards of5 fered under subsection (a) may not exceed $10,000,000, 

6 and the total amount of rewards offered in connection with 

7 the kidnapping and murder of either one of the individuals 

8 named in such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00189

- CR

E X PARTE A USTIN M ICHAELIS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal Cour t No. 4

of Denton County ( CR

- 2021

- 00513

- D

- WHC )

April 21, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order

. It is order ed t hat the trial court ’ s order is

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabe th Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4519-H4520]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        CIVIL LIBERTIES FOR ALL

  (Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, I am fascinated with the 
process by which right-wingers have become devotees of civil liberties. 
A few years ago, when a lot of them were getting indicted, they became 
great supporters of such procedural protections as due possess and the 
fifth amendment.
  Now we have seen a great rightwing rush, late in life, but I always 
like conversions, to embrace the principles of free speech. They have 
now decided that people who say crazy, irresponsible, dangerous things 
under the first amendment should be allowed to say them. I agree with 
them. I have always felt that way.
  The problem is that they only imperfectly understand that. Because 
the fact is that the right to say these kinds of things--irresponsible 
and obnoxious and in some cases threatening--cannot only go to their 
rightwing caricatures. It goes to the left as well.
  I am particularly struck by the fact that many of those who wanted 
the rapper Ice-T to be shut up and taken off the air, because he talked 
about killing policemen--and he certainly was, in my judgment, 
obnoxious and irresponsible--turn around and want to honor G. Gordon 
Liddy.
  Now, they got a little embarrassed after the Oklahoma bombing, so 
they backed away from Liddy a little bit. But the fact is, there is 
very little difference morally or in the nature of the rhetoric between 
Ice-T and G. Gordon 
[[Page H4520]] Liddy. I suppose at a future Republican senatorial 
dinner, we will see both of them doing a duet.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Special Tactics Airman killed in training incidentPublished Oct. 10, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Rachel Yates
                        
                        
                        24th Special Operations Wing Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Tech. Sgt. Peter Kraines, 33, a 24th Special Operations Wing special tactics pararescueman, died from injuries sustained in a training incident while performing mountain rescue techniques in Boise, Idaho, Oct. 8. The incident is currently under investigation.
Kraines enlisted in the United States Air Force in March 2011. He immediately entered the two-year pararescue training program. Upon completion of the program, he was assigned to the 347th Rescue Group, Moody Air Force Base, Georgia. In March 2017, Kraines was assessed and selected to join the ranks within special tactics and then assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
“This is a tragic loss to the special tactics community,” said Col. Matthew Allen, 24th SOW commander. “We are grateful for the support from our community and our (Air Force Special Operations Command) teammates. Our thoughts are with his family, friends and teammates at this time.”
Kraines was a military static-line jumper, free fall jumper, an Air Force combat scuba diver and certified as an emergency medical technician. As a special tactics pararescueman, Kraines was specially trained and equipped for immediate deployment into combat operations to conduct combat search and rescue and personnel recovery operations.
His awards and decorations include an Air Medal with one oak leaf cluster, Aerial Achievement Medal, Air Force Commendation Medal, Air Force Achievement Medal, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Meritorious Unit Award, Air Force Longevity Service Award, Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with gold border, Small Arms Expert Ribbon, Air Force Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon, Air Force Training Ribbon and NATO Medal.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Hurlburt Field 



fla. 



24th Operations Wing 



Special Tactics Community 



Special Tactics 



pararescueman 



PJ 



training incident 



personnel recovery 



mountain rescue 



AFSOC 



Air Force Special Operations Command
#### Henry R. and Dorothy F. BALLARD, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 79-7008.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 6, 1980.

Decided Dec. 16, 1980.

Henry R. and Dorothy F. Ballard, pro se.

Gilbert E. Andrews, Chief, Appellate Sec., Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.

Before KENNEDY and TANG, Circuit Judges, and LARSON,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Earl R. Larson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The instant case is an attempt to appeal from a decision rendered under the small claims procedure of the tax court. 26 U.S.C. § 7463. The statute quite specifically denies us any jurisdiction in such matters. 26 U.S.C. § 7463(b). The Sixth Circuit is in agreement with our conclusion. *Kahle v. Commissioner,*566 F.2d 581, 582 (6th Cir. 1977). Any constitutional objections to the procedure are not set forth with specificity, and our review of such considerations, therefore, is not justified in this case.

The appeal is DISMISSED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report of Sprout Social, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe Del Preto, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 SPROUT SOCIAL, INC.By:/s/ Joe Del PretoName:Joe Del PretoTitle:Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 Date: February 27, 2020
 
 
 
 II-1
EXHIBIT 35.1














SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION (“THE SERVICER”)








I, Wei Shi, certify that:





(a)   A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable Sale and Servicing Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2012 has been made under my supervision.




(b)   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








March 21, 2013








By:  /S/ WEI SHI





Wei Shi


Vice President - Treasury, Finance & Analytics


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of the


Toyota Auto Receivables 2011-A Owner Trust


- 22 -
EXHIBIT 32.1   SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF MASSIVE DYNAMICS, INC.  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Massive Dynamics, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2013, the undersigned, Jonathan Jay Howard, CEO of Massive Dynamics, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Massive Dynamics, Inc.


|                      |                                                                                
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2013 | /s/ Jonathan Jay Howard                                                        
|                      | Jonathan Jay Howard                                                            
|                      | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             774
<SECURITIES>                                     1,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                      543
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,097
<PP&E>                                           2,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,335
<SALES>                                         10,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,100
<CGS>                                            6,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    480
<INCOME-TAX>                                       249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES MARTIN.

Dec. 10, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the Company) on for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arun Menawat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Arun Menawat                     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Arun Menawat                         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
FREDERICK BARRETT,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0160

Opinion filed September 14, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Frederick Barrett, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida 

Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.