alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 CMSAF visits with 445th AW, 655th ISRWPublished Oct. 7, 2021
                        
                        
                        445th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                **Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass** visited with Reserve Airmen from the 445th Airlift Wing and 655th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Wing during her visit to **Wright-Patterson Air Force Base**, Ohio, Oct. 2.
During her first stop, Bass met with Airmen from the 655th ISR Wing. There, she received a wing mission brief and participated in an enlisted call.
Her next stop she met with Airmen from the 445th Civil Engineer, 445th Logistics Readiness and 87th Aerial Port Squadrons and toured their areas.
From there, Bass stopped at Hangar 4024, where she was given a tour of the metal technologies shop. Her visit concluded with an enlisted call.
During her visit to both wings, Bass coined one 655th ISR Wing Airman and three 445th AW Airmen who were chosen as outstanding performers for the wing; Tech. Sgt. Jana Palant, 655th ISR Group noncommissioned officer in charge of readiness and training, Tech. Sgt. Ryan Lucas, 445th Logistics Readiness Squadron NCOIC of ground transportation support, Staff Sgt. Leslie Smith, 445th Maintenance Squadron non-destructive inspection journeyman, and Tech. Sgt. Marcela Itah, 89th Airlift Squadron squadron aviation resource management technician. Lucas and Smith were coined in their respective units while Palant and Itah were coined during their enlisted calls.
In addition to the outstanding performers, Bass coined Master Sgt. Sean Sullivan, 445th Civil Engineer Squadron firefighter, for his role in securing first place in the over-40 age category at the FireFit Europe Championships held in Hannover, Germany, June 20. In return, he gave her a City of Frankfort, Kentucky, coin from his civilian job as a firefighter with the Frankfort Fire Department.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



CMSAF 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force 



JoAnne S. Bass 



AFRC 



Air Force Reserve Command 



Wright-Patterson AFB
#### HOWARD LONSK v. EDWIN PENNEFATHER.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied. (See 168 *N.J.Super.*178)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2878 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2878

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
  income for student loan forgiveness for students in certain income-
   based or income-contingent repayment programs who have completed 
              payment obligations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
  income for student loan forgiveness for students in certain income-
   based or income-contingent repayment programs who have completed 
              payment obligations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN STUDENT LOANS THE REPAYMENT OF WHICH IS INCOME 
              CONTINGENT OR INCOME-BASED.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``any student loan if'' and 
all that follows and inserting ``any student loan if--
                    ``(A) such discharge was pursuant to a provision of 
                such loan under which all or part of the indebtedness 
                of the individual would be discharged if the individual 
                worked for a certain period of time in certain 
                professions for any of a broad class of employers, or
                    ``(B) such discharge was pursuant to section 455(e) 
                or section 493C(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act of 
                1965 (relating to income contingent and income-based 
                repayment).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to discharges of loans after December 31, 2014.

SEC. 3. STUDENT LOANS DISCHARGED ON ACCOUNT OF DEATH OR DISABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 2, is amended by striking 
``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the 
end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the 
end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) such discharge was on account of the death or 
                total and permanent disability of the student.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to discharges of loans after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 12 CINEMARK, INC.
CALCULATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES Year Ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Computation of Earnings:Registrants pretax income
(loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative
effect of an accounting change
    
    $
    40,342,713
    
    
    $
    72,430,697
    
    
    $
    69,499,323
    
    
    $
    (18,135,897
    )
    
    $
    (10,171,364
    )Capitalized interest
    
    
    52,805
    
    
    
    220,143
    
    
    
    432,992
    
    
    
    217,288
    
    
    
    (180,622
    )Total earnings
    
    $
    40,395,518
    
    
    $
    72,650,840
    
    
    $
    69,932,315
    
    
    $
    (17,918,609
    )
    
    $
    (10,351,986
    )Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    69,470,459
    
    
    $
    51,852,977
    
    
    $
    55,428,317
    
    
    $
    68,542,792
    
    
    $
    73,151,772Capitalized interest
    
    
    406,760
    
    
    
    233,582
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    215,704
    
    
    
    613,614Amortization of debt issue costs
    
    
    3,472,406
    
    
    
    2,310,372
    
    
    
    2,364,680
    
    
    
    2,387,828
    
    
    
    885,449Interest factor on rent expense
    
    
    37,713,119
    
    
    
    36,231,505
    
    
    
    34,944,927
    
    
    
    38,245,508
    
    
    
    36,162,868Total fixed charges
    
    
    111,062,744
    
    
    
    90,628,436
    
    
    
    92,737,924
    
    
    
    109,391,832
    
    
    
    110,813,703Total Earnings and Fixed Charges
    
    $
    151,458,262
    
    
    $
    163,279,276
    
    
    $
    162,670,239
    
    
    $
    91,473,223
    
    
    $
    100,461,717Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges
    
    
    1.36
    
    
    
    1.80
    
    
    
    1.75
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4801]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           WHERE IS THE CUT?

  (Mr. HOBSON asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. HOBSON. Mr. Speaker, where is the cut?
  House Democrats have come to the floor, claiming that Republicans are 
cutting Medicare.
  But I have to ask my colleagues, where is the cut?
  If you look at this simple chart, you will see that Republicans are 
not cutting Medicare at all. In fact, we are increasing Medicare 
spending per person from $4,700 to $6,300.
  So, where is the cut?
  In a liberal Democrat's mind, whenever you slow the growth of 
spending, whenever you weed out waste and fraud, whenever you give a 
bureaucrat his walking papers, that is a cut.
  But to the American taxpayers, these are not cuts. To senior 
citizens, these are not cuts. To people possessed of common sense, 
these are not cuts.
  These are reforms that preserve, protect and improve Medicare far 
into the next century.
  Mr. Speaker, I have to ask my colleagues, where is the cut?

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                         Page 14
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brunswick Bancorp and subsidiaries
(the "company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") ,
I Carmen Gumina, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the company.

            Date:   10/23/03                /s/ Carmen J. Gumina
                  --------------        -----------------------------------
                                                Carmen J. Gumina
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) of ROI Land
Investments Ltd. (the “Company”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacities as Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigned’s knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 21, 2015                                 | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                     | 
|/s/ Sebastien Cliche                                 | 
|Sebastien Cliche
        Principal Financial Officer | 



The foregoing certification is furnished as an exhibit to
the Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4675]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                MEDICARE: THE REAL CONTRACT WITH AMERICA

  (Mr. FARR asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. FARR. Mr. Speaker, there is a lot of talk these days about 
contracts.
  There is the Republican Contract With America.
  There is the contract with America's veterans.
  There is the contract with Federal retirees.
  And there is the contract with senior citizens.
  So far this year, the spotlight has been on the Republican Contract 
With America. The Republicans are quite boastful about moving their 
contract through the House in 100 days.
  But what about the other contracts? What about the promises made to 
veterans, Federal retirees, and senior citizens?
  I am particularly concerned about breaking America's contract with 
our senior citizens.
  For years we have promised reasonable health care through the 
Medicare system. Now the Republicans are willing to sacrifice 
Medicare--and the seniors who depend on it--in order to pay for tax 
cuts for the wealthy.
  If the Republicans want to meet the terms of this country's contract 
with senior citizens, then they should look elsewhere for their budget 
and tax fixes than the pocketbooks of our senior citizens.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Nicola Battaglia, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDG Environmental, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report. 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (i) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By         /s/ Nicola Battaglia    Nicola Battaglia    Chief Financial Officer   Date: September 14, 2007
27
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Pivotal Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Robert Ritch
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2012
News United States Air Force
 AFSOC History Office wins 2021 Air Force Excellence in Command History Program AwardPublished Jan. 6, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Brandon Esau
                        
                        
                        Air Force Special Operations Command Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                The******Air Force Special Operations Command** History and Heritage Office received the Department of the Air Force’s Excellence in Command History Program Management Award for 2021 from **Lt. Gen. Jim Slife**, AFSOC commander, Jan. 4, at Hurlburt Field.

The award recognizes the best primary or field command history office for outstanding history and heritage programs leadership that provided exemplary historical services to improve organizational effectiveness, esprit de corps, and combat capability.

“The command’s team of outstanding historians prepared a comprehensive, well-written, and thoroughly documented history,” said Walter A. Grudzinskas, director of Air Force History and Museums. “Their team displayed unwavering professionalism and commitment to preserving our history, inspiring special operations Airmen, and improving Air Force combat capability.”

The primary roles of a history office is gathering and submitting annual histories, which detail the significant events of the unit. The AFSOC History Office also documents the actions of air commandos of the past, focusing on the insight of their operations to reinvest important information into the command’s decision-making process.

The history office’s contributions included creating and publishing a 30th AFSOC anniversary pamphlet, developing heritage displays that illustrate current operations and humanitarian assistance provided by the command, and arranged an oral history collection on the development of a special operations forces following the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986.

“I’m extremely proud of the team and all of the hard work they put in every single day,” said Mr. Eric Witt, deputy command historian of AFSOC. “With our multi-faceted approach to documenting the history and the command’s constant churn of events, our team is always pulled in different directions to make sure we get everything right. And this award is evidence that we always hit our mark.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFSOC 



Air Force Special Operations Command 



history 



excellence 



historian 



award 



recognition
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0060 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL LEE CAMERON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 16 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 10 2020

09/10/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0060
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN09-10-000]


National Fuel Marketing Company, LLC; NFM Midstream, LLC; NFM 
Texas Pipeline, LLC; NFM Texas Gathering, LLC; Notice of Amended 
Designation of Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

September 2, 2010.
    On January 15, 2009, the Commission issued an order in the above-
captioned docket designating, with certain listed exceptions, the staff 
of the Office of Enforcement's Division of Investigations (DOI) as non-
decisional staff in deliberations by the Commission in this docket.
    By this order, the Commission amends the January 15, 2009 notice to 
add Larry Gasteiger, Deputy Director, Office of Enforcement to the non-
decisional staff in this docket. The Commission also adds Norman Bay, 
Director, Office of Enforcement, Larry Parkinson, Director, DOI, and 
Geof Hobday of DOI to the January 15, 2009 list of staff excepted from 
the DOI non-decisional staff designation.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22514 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brunswick Bancorp and subsidiaries
(the "company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") ,
I Thomas Fornale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the company.

            Date: 10/21/04                      Thomas Fornale
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Thomas Fornale
                                                Chief Financial Officer