alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00198-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ANTHONY DORSETT PURVIS

, } APPEALED FROM 3RD DISTRICT COURT

APPELLANT

V. } IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, } ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

ORDER

Appellant is represented by Mr. William M. House, appointed counsel. On December 31, 2014,

the time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief or a motion for extension of time. T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 38.6(a). Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b), counsel was notified on January 7, 2015, that his brief

was past due and was given until January 19, 2015, to file a brief or otherwise explain the delay. No

satisfactory response has been received.

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(3), it is ORDERED that Honorable Mark A. Calhoon, Judge

of the 3rd District Court of Anderson County, Texas, shall immediately conduct a hearing to determine

(1) whether the appellant still desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) whether the appellant is indigent and

either needs counsel appointed, or appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal; or (3) if the appellant

is not indigent, whether a brief has not been completed because retained counsel has either abandoned

the appeal or because appellant has failed to make necessary arrangements for filing a brief; and (4)

when appellant’s counsel anticipates that the appellant’s brief, if a brief is to be filed, will be completed.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the judge shall (1) make appropriate findings as to the above

set forth issues and (2) cause a record of the proceedings to be prepared.It is ADDITIONALLY ORDERED that once findings are made as to the above set forth issues,

if appellant is indigent, the judge shall (1) take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant’s

effective representation, which may include the appointment of new counsel and (2) make

recommendations to this Court regarding a proper filing date for the appellant’s brief.

It is FINALLY ORDERED that the supplemental clerk’s record (including any orders and

findings) and the reporter’s record of said hearing be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before

February 27, 2015

.

WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals, 12 th Court of

Appeals District, Tyler, Texas.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas this 28th day of January

2015

, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

CATHY S. LUSK

, CLERK

By:

______________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         Oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>            May-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>              Jul-31-1999
<CASH>                        1239944
<SECURITIES>                  3116731
<RECEIVABLES>                  424006
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                     38204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1761181
<PP&E>                        1623537
<DEPRECIATION>                 664967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                6224220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          308069
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                      2722676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                    3061941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  6224220
<SALES>                       4346201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4726176
<CGS>                          179380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4213746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              4034366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              64696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                512430
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            512430
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                   512430
<EPS-BASIC>                     .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .12


</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 50381 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Jessica Marie Reyes Garcia,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 454

- 1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

The attorney appointed to represent Jessica Marie Reyes Garcia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2021

L yle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50381 Document: 00516138338 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2021No. 21

- 50381

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Reyes Garcia ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal pr esents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED

. See
5th Cir. R

. 42. 2. Case: 21-50381 Document: 00516138338 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2021
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KING, G ASTON , and , COGLEY , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Michael S. LIBBY Fire Controlman First Class (E

- 6 ), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900 270
Decided: 19 March 2020 Appeal from the Unit ed States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Michael J. Luken Sentence adjudged 2 9 May 2019 by a general court

- martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, V irginia , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence approved by the convening authority : r eduction to E

- 3 , confinement for 2 years, and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: C

aptain B rian L. Farrell, USMCR For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but may be cited as persuasive authority under

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2.United States v. Libby , No. 201 9 00 270

2 _________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determine d that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, U niform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866

. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Cle rk of Court
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 295 

To allow certain Indonesian citizens to file a motion to reopen their asylum 

claims. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To allow certain Indonesian citizens to file a motion to 

reopen their asylum claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indonesian Family 

5 Refugee Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOTION TO REOPEN ASYLUM CLAIMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subparagraphs 

8 (B) and (C) of section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)) and section 

10 240(c)(7) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(7)), and notVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:33 Feb 23, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S295.IS S295

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 295 IS

1 withstanding any other provision of law on motions to re2 open removal or deportation proceedings, an alien may file 

3 1 motion to reopen an asylum claim during the 2-year pe4 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act 

5 if the alien— 

6 (1) is a citizen of Indonesia; 

7 (2) entered the United States after January 1, 

8 1997, and before November 30, 2002; 

9 (3) filed an application for asylum that was de10 nied asylum based solely upon a failure to meet the 

11 1-year application filing deadline; 

12 (4) is not subject to the safe third country ex13 ception under section 208(a)(2)(A) of the Immigra14 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)); 

15 and 

16 (5) is not subject to a bar from seeking asylum 

17 under section 208(b)(2) of the Immigration and Na18 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(2)). 

19 (b) APPLICATION FROM ABROAD.—The motion to re20 open referred to in subsection (a) may be filed in the 

21 United States or from outside the United States. 

22 (c) RETURN OF APPLICANTS ABROAD.—An alien who 

23 meets the requirements under subsection (a) may be ad24 mitted or otherwise authorized to enter the United States 

25 solely to prosecute a motion to reopen under this section 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 295 IS

1 or otherwise to pursue relief under this section. Hearings 

2 pursuant to this section may be held in the United States 

3 or outside the United States, with the alien appearing in 

4 person or by video phone or similar device. 

5 (d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act, the 

6 terms used in this Act have the meanings given such terms 

7 in section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

8 (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

(Date)                          December 15, 2003


BY(Signature)                   /s/ Peter Porath
(Name and Title)                Peter Porath
                                President, Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNEST P. ROBERTS.

Dec. 10, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Tactical Leadership Programme / Tyndall rebuildsPublished Nov. 30, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Braden Anderson
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                On this look Around the Air Force, the Tactical Leadership Programme trains NATO allied Airmen, about 600 Airmen participate in a readiness exercise at Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, and an update on the recovery of Tyndall Air Force Base after Hurricane Michael. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Braden Anderson.</iframe

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **493rd FS trains during Tactical Leadership Programme 18-4**
- **JB Charleston executes full-spectrum readiness exercise**
- **Tyndall AFB rebuilds after Hurricane Michael**
 exercise Florida Air Force TV NATO Italy readiness Tyndall AFB South Carolina Around the Air Force Featured Videos Tactical Leadership Programme AF Reports SSgt Braden Anderson Hurricane Michael Amendola ATAF JB Charleston F-15
EXHIBIT 33.1









REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES






Entergy Louisiana, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:




(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);




(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;




(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2011 and for the period September 22, 2011 through December 31, 2011, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and




(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the period September 22, 2011 through December 31, 2011, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.













Date:  March 29, 2012






Entergy Louisiana, LLC as servicer




By:   /s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Name:    Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Title:      Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6201]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Thomas, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Uniform Office seeks feedback on maternity uniformsPublished July 25, 2019
                        
                        By Brian Brackens
                        
                        
                        Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Uniform Office has begun surveying female Airmen to collect feedback on Air Force maternity uniform items.
All Air Force women will receive an email message from the Air Force Survey Office with a unique link inviting them to take the survey. To determine who should take the full survey, the Uniform Office is asking participants to respond to the first survey question.
“Getting feedback on maternity uniform items is important,” Tracy Roan, Uniform Office chief said. “Our goal is to make uniforms more comfortable and provide a uniform that will sustain Airmen through their entire pregnancy.”
Roan went on to add that due to privacy rules, Airmen who have worn maternity items or are currently wearing them are a difficult population to reach and the survey is a great avenue to reach them.
Feedback from the survey will help determine how well maternity uniforms are meeting the needs of pregnant Airmen, and guide the design and development of the uniforms.
The survey, which is open to active duty, Reserve and Guard, ends Sept. 23.
For questions about the survey or maternity uniforms, send an email message to AFLCMC.WNUV.TAC.AF.UniformOffice@us.af.mil.JBSA 



JB San Antonio 



Air Force Uniform Office 



AF 



Air Force 



Wright-Patterson AFB 



maternity 



uniform 



feedback 



survey 



LR 



Air Force Survey Office
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of the activities of Deere Credit Services, Inc. for the period from April 20, 2011 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2011 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 20, 2011 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2011 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 
| Date:   January 13, 2012 | Deere   Credit Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |   |
|                          |                               |   |
|                          | By                                 | */s/   James A. Israel* |   |
|                          |                               | James   A. Israel |
|                          |                               | President |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kopin Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. C. Fan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: May 11, 2006By:

/S/    JOHN C. C.
FANJohn C. C. Fan President and Chief Executive Officer
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0243

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v.

BRANDON LEE CRAFT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including January 2, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 22 2022

11/22/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0243