alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS OF VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BY INTER COUNTY REFUSE SERVICE, INC.

October 4, 1984.

Motion of the State of New Jersey for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Appellate Division order of July 20, 1984 is modified to vacate the stay of the Board of Public Utilities’ revocation proceedings and to defer the application of H & M Disposal Service Co., Inc., until resolution of the revocation proceedings.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4618-H4619]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               MEMORIALS

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, memorials were presented and referred as 
follows:

       68. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Hawaii, relative to urging the U.S. Congress to renew the 
     highly successful U.S. Sugar Program in the 1995 farm bill; 
     to the Committee on Agriculture.
       69. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of Hawaii, 
     relative to urging the U.S. Congress to renew the highly 
     successful U.S. Sugar Program in the 1995 farm bill; to the 
     Committee on Agriculture.
       70. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Washington, relative to requesting the United States to 
     advocate for the admission of Taiwan to the United Nations; 
     to the Committee on International Relations.
       71. Also, memorial of the Senate of the State of 
     Washington, relative to water adjudication; to the Committee 
     on Resources.
       72. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Maine, relative to Federal mandates; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
       73. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Washington, relative to urging Congress to use 
     transportation funds for transportation purposes; to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
       74. Also, memorial of the House of Representatives of the 
     State of Minnesota, relative to memorializing Congress to 
     fund the Amtrak system to enable it to continue to serve 
     Minnesota; to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure.
       [[Page H4619]] 75. Also, memorial of the House of 
     Representatives of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, relative 
     to memorializing the Congress of the United States to enact 
     legislation to allow Federal income tax deductions on medical 
     expenditures and health insurance premiums purchased by the 
     self-employed, and other individuals' to the Committee on 
     Ways and Means.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT
32.1



Certification
of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of PetVivo Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended March 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
John Lai, Principal Financial and Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained
    in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Date:
    December 10, 2018 | By: | /s/
    John Lai                                                                            
|--------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |     | John Lai

President and Director
        (Principal
        Financial and Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. FKA CST
      Entertainment, Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 10QSB for the period ending
      September 30, 1999, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and
      Principle Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
      knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





Dated:
      August 21, 2008





/S/
                Robert MatthewsName:
                Robert MatthewsTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting
                Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 19, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 19, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0061. DEKALB COUNTY v. PAMELA STANLEY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18A68490
News United States Air Force
 Air Force C-130s, Airmen deploy to Portugal for Real Thaw 18Published Feb. 6, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Andrew Park
                        
                        
                        94th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **MONTE REAL AIR BASE, Portugal (AFNS) --**
                Approximately 50 Airmen and two C-130H3 Hercules assigned to the 94th Airlift Wing, Dobbins Air Reserve Base, Georgia, arrived at Monte Real Air Base, Portugal to participate in Real Thaw 18, a Portuguese-led exercise.
The annual two-week exercise includes armed forces from multiple nations participating in training missions aimed at merging and deploying different platforms toward a major objective, covering a vast range of activities including air-to-air and air-to-ground training, tactical air transport operations and close air support.
“It provides a unique training opportunity,” said Maj. Richard Konopczynski, 700th Airlift Squadron deputy mission commander. “We get to work with our coalition partners. We have other C-130 units here from different countries, and we get to not only compare our techniques, but also work in a deployed environment.”
This year’s exercise included 1,500 participants and 35 aircraft from Spain, Denmark, Netherlands, France, Portugal and the U.S.
The exercise also goes beyond the scope of flying missions to include support roles such as communications, security forces, maintenance and intelligence. The scenarios will integrate daily realistic interoperability tasks in the air and on the ground between multinational units.
“We set up a scenario that resembles a very specific situation in the world,” said Lt. Col. Joao Rosa, exercise coordinator and Portuguese air force fighter pilot. “We are simulating that we deployed a NATO force to a country. What we are going to do with all the types of aircraft we have, with all the army forces and navy forces, is to protect that small country.”
“The goal is for participants to know each other on a more personal level to establish rapport and create lasting bonds,” said Rosa. “The exercise brings everyone together as much as possible, whether it be flying, briefing or working together.”
These relationships have real-world consequences with much of the warfighting effort involving a number of allied forces from different countries working together now and in future contingency operations.
“It’s an opportunity to exercise a lot of our skills, tactics and procedures in a coalition environment,” said Konopczynski.
Dobbins ARB is participating for the first time in the exercise, which will last from Jan. 29 to Feb. 9, 2018.exercise 



mission 



C-130 Hercules 



Portugal 



coalition 



Monte Real Air Base 



Dobbins Air Reserve Base 



Real Thaw 18 



C-130H Hercules 



94th Airlift Wing 



Airmen
exhibit10-a.htm


 


Exhibit 10-a














Agreement to Purchase AXN Shares


 


Party A:  Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (AXN)


 


Party B:


 


After consultation, Party A and Party B reached an agreement as follows:  Party B will purchase ___________ AXN common shares at a price of $0.26/share = $____________.


 


This agreement will become effective on the date that this transaction is approved by the NYSE MKT. Within one week after approval, Party B will pay the purchase price to Party A, and Party A will deliver to Party B a certificate for the Shares.


 







 


Signature:


 


Party A:  Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.


 


Its CEO:


 


Party B:


 


October 4, 2014
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ANTONIO TORRES-CORTEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50243

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03499-MMA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Torres-Cortez appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United

States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50243

Torres-Cortez contends that the district court procedurally erred at

sentencing by failing to adequately justify the sentence imposed and to consider all

of the factors set forth under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including the staleness of a prior

conviction which increased the applicable Guidelines range. He further contends

that the resulting sentence is substantively unreasonable. 

The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err, see United

States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), and that, in light of

the totality of the circumstances, the sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range

is substantively reasonable, see id. at 993-94.

AFFIRMED.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2790 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to permit a prevailing party in an action or proceeding brought to enforce the Act 

to be awarded expert witness fees and certain other expenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

to permit a prevailing party in an action or proceeding 

brought to enforce the Act to be awarded expert witness 

fees and certain other expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IDEA Fairness Res5 toration Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2790 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF EXPERT WITNESS FEES AND OTHER 

2 EXPENSES AS ATTORNEYS’ FEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 615(i)(3) of the Individ4 uals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 

5 1415(i)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(H) INCLUSION OF EXPERT WITNESS

7 FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES AS ATTORNEYS’ 

8 FEES.—In this paragraph, the term ‘attorneys’ 

9 fees’ shall include the fees of expert witnesses, 

10 including the reasonable costs of any test or 

11 evaluation necessary for the preparation of the 

12 parent or guardian’s case in the action or pro13 ceeding.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to any action or proceeding 

16 brought under section 615 of the Individuals with Disabil17 ities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1415) that has not been 

18 finally adjudicated as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         242,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,851,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    264,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,196,000
<PP&E>                                       5,539,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,172,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,522,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,476,000
<BONDS>                                      1,253,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,000
<COMMON>                                       169,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,276,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,522,000
<SALES>                                     13,022,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,022,000
<CGS>                                       11,108,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,108,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (348,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (348,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (348,000)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
<FN>
<F1>The three and six months ended July 31, 1999 included a $379,000 charge related
to the settlement of a litigation.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E971]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      ADMINISTRATION RENEGES ON COMMITMENT TO PREVENT CUBAN INFLUX

                                 ______

                             HON. BOB STUMP

                               of arizona

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 9, 1995
  Mr. STUMP. Mr. Speaker, the Attorney General again intends to use her 
parole powers to sidestep immigration law. In a rather abrupt and 
unwise change of policy, the Clinton Administration announced that 
thousands of Cuban refugees held at Guantanamo Bay will be brought to 
the United States.
  The Attorney General defends this latest action as ``another 
important step toward regularizing migration procedures with Cuba.'' I 
am convinced that it will have the opposite effect. In fact, this is 
just another in a long line of imprudent immigration decisions made by 
the Administration. Undoubtedly, it will have a devastating economic 
impact and send a clear message that the United States has no interest 
in controlling its borders.
  Mr. Speaker, we simply cannot continue to allow the Attorney General 
to use her parole authority to exploit immigration laws and expand the 
definition of who is eligible to immigrate to the United States. 
Consequently, I am compelled to once again introduce the Emergency 
Immigration Parole Correction Act. The bill would amend the Attorney 
General's parole authority to prohibit her from carrying out this 
blatant circumvention of our immigration policies. I strongly urge my 
colleagues to put the interests of American citizens first and join me 
in stopping further deterioration of our immigration policies.

                          ____________________
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 1

- 3 346

_____________________________
T E RRY L EE J ACKS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Dedee S. Costello
, Judge

. November 7, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J

. , and R AY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4436]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Mississippi [Mr. 
Montgomery] will lead the membership in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. MONTGOMERY led the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.
     

                          ____________________
```
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6452** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ISAAC LEE WOODS; REGINA BAILEY WOODS , Defendants

– Appellants
.

Appeal from the United States District Co urt for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , Chief District Judge. ( 5:0 5

- cr - 00131

- FL

- 1; 5:05

- cr - 00131

- FL

- 2; 5:09

- cv - 00396

- FL; 5:09

- cv - 00397

- FL)

Submitted : July 29, 2010 Decided: September 14, 2010

Before WILKINS ON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Isaac Lee Woods, Regina Bailey Woods , Appellants Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys , for Appellee.
Unpublished opi nions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Isaac Lee Woods and Regina Bailey Woods seek to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutio nal right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a n appellant satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, an appellant must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural rulin g is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that the Woods ha ve not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we d eny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny the Woods’ motions seeking a copy of a transcript at Government expense, random case assignment to a different panel , recusal of panel3 and to expedite the decision. We deny Isaac Woo ds’ motion for release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED