alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Scott Keys, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

       /s/ SCOTT KEYS
------------------------------------
Scott Keys
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
October 31, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D556]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings

  No committee meetings were held.

Joint Meetings
EMPLOYMENT SITUATION
Joint Economic Committee: Committee held hearings to examine the 
employment-unemployment situation for April, receiving testimony from 
Katherine G. Abraham, Commissioner, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 
Department of Labor.
  Committee recessed subject to call.
```
News United States Air Force
 421st Fighter Squadron and AMU receive first F-35APublished Dec. 13, 2018
                        
                        By 388th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                The 421st Fighter Squadron received its first F-35A Lightning II Dec. 12. The squadron is the last of three squadrons in Hill Air Force Base’s 388th Fighter Wing to take possession of combat-ready aircraft, bringing the 388th Fighter Wing closer to full strength. 
The Air Force’s first operational F-35As landed at Hill AFB in October 2015. Since then, the 34th and 4th Fighter Squadrons and Aircraft Maintenance Units stood up and generated nearly 10,000 sorties with more than 15,000 flying hours.
The arrival of the first jets in the 421st FS brings the total number of F-35As at Hill AFB to 52 and is a big step toward the 388th Fighter Wing having a full complement of 78 F-35A Lightning IIs by the end of 2019. 
The 421st Aircraft Maintenance Unit, which will support the 421st Fighter Squadron, has been preparing to receive the aircraft for some time by maintaining and launching jets loaned from the wings two other squadrons. 
“The 421st has a proud history in the 388th Fighter Wing and we’re all excited to receive our first aircraft,” said Lt. Col. Richard Orzechowski, 421st Fighter Squadron commander. “Our pilots and maintainers have been working hard and we’re ready to fill the squadron out and fulfill the wing’s mission: to rapidly employ combat power.” 
The active duty 388th FW and Air Force Reserve 419th FW fly and maintain the F-35A in a Total Force partnership, which capitalizes on the strength of both components.ACC 



Air Combat Command 



421st Fighter Squadron 



421st FS 



AMU 



F-35A 



Lightning II 



Hill AFB 



AF 



Air Force 



388th FW 



388th Fighter Wing
Douglas

Saitta The findings and recommendations of a disciplinary hearing panel, though persuasive, are not binding on this court. In re Discipline of Stuhff, 108 Nev. 629, 633, 837 P.2d 853, 855 (1992). The automatic review of a panel decision recommending a suspension is conducted de novo, requiring the exercise of independent judgment by this court. Id.; see SCR 105(3)(b). Based on our review of the record, the suspension recommendation is insufficient in relation to Sipan's admitted conduct. Accordingly, we reject the conditional guilty plea agreement and remand this matter to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for further proceedings.

It is so ORDERED.

, C.J.

Hardesty

4:29tial " ' Parraguirre t r ) k41 ,

Gibbons

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947 A 

### er .cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Richard C. Sipan Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 

### e
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2801 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2801

  To provide for conditions on the renewal of health insurance plans 
                      purchased through Exchanges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2014

  Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for conditions on the renewal of health insurance plans 
                      purchased through Exchanges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Heath Care Consumer Choices 
Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS ON RENEWAL OF HEALTH PLANS PURCHASED THROUGH 
              EXCHANGES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 
qualified health plan purchased by an individual through an American 
Health Benefit Exchange for plan year 2014 shall not be automatically 
renewed with respect to such individual for plan year 2015 unless--
            (1) the plan premium for plan year 2015 is the same as the 
        plan premium for plan year 2014; or
            (2) the individual requests such automatic renewal of the 
        plan.
    (b) Determination of Premium.--A plan may be automatically renewed 
as described in subsection (a)(1) only if the cost of the premium to 
the individual would be the same for plan year 2015 as for plan year 
2014, before and after application of a premium assistance credit under 
section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as applicable.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 of Cardium
Therapeutics, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher J. Reinhard                     
|                   |  |  |  | Christopher J. Reinhard, Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Dennis M. Mulroy                            
|                   |  |  |  | Dennis M. Mulroy, Chief Financial Officer       

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30511

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES CARDEC,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ED C. DAY, Warden; RICHARD IEYOUB,

Attorney General, State of Louisiana,

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1572-N

- - - - - - - - - -

March 10, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Cardec, a Louisiana prisoner (# 109107), appeals the

district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas

corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Cardec argues that

his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause were violated when he

was convicted of manslaughter and an underlying felony,

aggravated burglary, when he had initially been charged with

first-degree murder. 
No. 98-30511 

-2-

Whether different statutes punish the same offense is

determined by the standard announced in Blockburger v. United

States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166

(1977). The Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits prosecution for

both a felony-murder and the underlying felony. Harris v.

Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 682, 682-83 (1977). 

Because Cardec pleaded guilty to manslaughter and aggravated

burglary, and because he does not challenge the voluntariness of

that plea, he may prevail only if the face of the indictments or

state-court record establishes that his convictions violate

double jeopardy. Broce v. United States, 488 U.S. 563, 574-75

(1989). The state trial court rejected Cardec’s double-jeopardy

challenge because “the evidence necessary to prove the additional

charge of aggravated burglary was not the same evidence needed to

convict [Cardec] of manslaughter.” Neither the indictments nor

the record on appeal affirmatively show that Cardec was subjected

to a double-jeopardy violation. Cardec cannot show that the

state-court decision “was contrary to, or involved an

unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as

determined by the Supreme Court of the United States[.]” See 28

U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment

is AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 Limited professional gear allowed during PCSPublished April 30, 2019
                        
                        By Master Sgt. Dan DeCook
                        
                        
                        Air Force Public Affairs Agency
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                As the permanent change of station peak season approaches, Air Force officials are reminding Airmen to review the Department of Defense policy on transportation of professional gear to avoid costly charges.
“We highly encourage Airmen get one-on-one counseling with their personal property processing office to learn exactly what is and what isn’t considered professional gear,” said Kevin Kennedy, Personal Property Activity deputy director. “Travelers should also carefully read through the Joint Federal Travel Regulation.”
As of May 1, 2014, the amount of professional books, papers and equipment, or PBP&E, shipped in household goods during a PCS move is limited to a maximum of 2,000 pounds and is not charged against the authorized household goods weight allowances.
This includes items such as instruments, tools and equipment unique to technicians, mechanics, medical professionals, musicians and members of the professions; and specialized clothing, such as diving suits, astronauts' suits, flying suits and helmets, band uniforms, chaplains' vestments; and other specialized apparel and unusual uniforms or clothing for the performance of official duties at the next duty assignment.
Issues arise when Airmen claim items as PBP&E that are not, which could cost them.
“An article which loses its identity as PBP&E continues as household goods, which can lead to excess weight charges for which an Airman is still financially responsible,” Kennedy said.
Policy excludes items of a professional nature that will not be necessary at the next duty station, such as text books from schools and personal books, even if used as part of a previous professional reading program, and some previously allowed categories such as personal computer equipment and memorabilia.
To view the JFTR and changes, see **Joint Federal Travel Regulation change 327** and **Joint Travel Regulation change 581**.SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Air Force 



policy 



DOD 



AF 



Department of Defense 



Air Force Public Affairs Agency 



PBP&E 



transportation 



Personal Property 



Permanent Change of Station 



Household Goods 



Heather Wilson 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Professional Books 



Papers & Equipment 



professional gear 



Personal Property Activity 



PCS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                IVAX CORPORATION

         The Articles of Incorporation of IVAX CORPORATION, a Florida
corporation (the "Corporation"), are amended effective as of May 18, 2001
pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.1006 of the Florida Statutes, as
follows:

                  Article III of the Articles of Incorporation of the
                  Corporation is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
                  with the following:

                           ARTICLE III - CAPITAL STOCK

                  The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall
                  have authority to issue is Four Hundred Thirty Seven and One
                  Half Million (437,500,000) shares of Common Stock, par value
                  $0.10 per share.

         This amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation at a meeting held on April 20, 2001 and does not require Shareholder
approval as such increase is in connection with a 5 for 4 Stock Split, also
approved on April 20, 2001, to be effective as of the payment date for the
Split, which is May 18, 2001.

                                           IVAX CORPORATION



                                           By: /s/ Neil Flanzraich
                                               -----------------------------
                                              Neil Flanzraich,
                                              Vice Chairman, President and
                                              Director




                                           By: /s/ Carol J. Gillespie
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Carol J. Gillespie,
                                               Secretary
[No. 23558-7-II.

Division Two.

April 7, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Isaac Tosh, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 98-8-00004-7, Terry D. Sebring, J., entered June 23, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Seinfeld, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55575-55576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22754]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary: Notification of an Open Meeting of the 
National Defense University Board of Visitors (BOV)

AGENCY: National Defense University, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 55576]]

SUMMARY: The National Defense University (NDU), Designated Federal 
Officer, has scheduled a meeting of the Board of Visitors for November 
4 and 5, 2010, in Washington, DC. The National Defense University Board 
of Visitors is a Federal Advisory Board. The Board meets twice a year 
in proceedings that are open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 4 (from 11:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m.) and November 5, 2010 (from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Marshall Hall, Building 62, Room 
155, the National Defense University, 300 5th Avenue, SW., Fort McNair, 
Washington, DC 20319-5066.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The point of contact for this notice 
is Ms. Dolores Hodge at (202) 685-0082, Fax (202) 685-7707 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1f9ded5d6d4f5f1dfd5c49fd4d5c4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="21694e45464465614f45540f444554">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The future agenda will include discussion on 
Defense transformation, faculty development, facilities, information 
technology, curriculum development, post 9/11 initiatives as well as 
other operational issues and areas of interest affecting the day-to-day 
operations of the National Defense University and its components. The 
meeting is open to the public; limited space made available for 
observers will be allocated on a first come, first served basis. 
Written statements to the committee may be submitted to the committee 
at any time or in response to a stated planned meeting agenda by fax or 
e-mail to the point of contact person listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT. Include in the Subject Line: ``Comment/Statement 
to the NDU BOV.''

    Dated: September 8, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-22754 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-10110

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ROZELL WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-311-A

_________________________________________________________________

December 3, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We have considered the claims of the petiti oner-appellant.

Our review of the record and the papers before us make it clear

that the district court did not err in concluding that Williams has

failed to demonstrate that his plea of guilty was involuntary.1 Williams’s motions for an investigator, for exhibits, etc.,

and of objection to transcripts, etc., are DENIED.

-2- Furthermore, none of the allegations re lating to his counsel

ultimately demonstrate deficiency and, thus, Williams has failed to

to raise a cognizable constitutional claim of ineffective counsel.

Finally, Williams’s argument that he was denied due process because

the state failed to provide favorable e vidence consisting of the

results of the blood test, the polygraph test, and the firearm’s

test is not properly before this court, because it was not raised

in the court below. In any event, this claim presents no basis

upon which to grant habeas relief to Williams.

Accordingly, the judgment o f the district court dismissing

Williams’s complaint is

A F F I R M E D. 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee for Geosciences (1755).

# DATES:

October 6, 2010-October 7, 2010; 8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m.

*Place:*                         Stafford I, Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Melissa Lane, National Science Foundation, Suite 705, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. Phone 703-292-8500.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning support for environmental research and education.                    

## Agenda

### October 6, 2010

      - Directorate activities and plans
      - Division Subcommittee Meetings
      - Briefing on GEO MREFC Project
      - Meeting with the Director

### October 7, 2010

      - Topical Subcommittee Meetings
      - Divisional and Topical Subcommittee Reports
      - Action Items/Planning for Fall Meeting

Dated: September 7, 2010.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-22606 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P