alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22794]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY


Appointment of Members of Senior Executive Services Performance 
Review Board.

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy [ONDCP].

ACTION: Notice of Appointments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Heading: Appointment of Members of Senior Executive Services 
Performance Review Board.
SUMMARY: The following persons have been appointed to the ONDCP Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board: Dr. Terry Zobeck, Ms. 
Martha Gagne, Ms. Christine Leonard, and Mr. Patrick Ward.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct any questions to Linda 
V. Priebe, Deputy General Counsel (202) 395-6622, Office of National 
Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 
20503.

Linda V. Priebe,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22794 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 23, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60351 Summary Calendar

FARIBA KEIVANI, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95 534 120

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Fariba Keivani, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions this court for review of the BIA’s denial of her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Keivani concedes that she previously filed a motion to reopen and that her instant motion was filed more than 90 days after the BIA completed its administrative review, contrary to the rules in 8 U.S.C. § 1003.2(c)(2). She contends, however, that she is not subject to these rules because her conversion to Christianity resulted in changed country conditions in Iran. The BIA rejected this argument and denied Keivani’sNo. 06-60351 -2- motion to reopen, reasoning that an individual’s religious conversion did not constitute a change in a country’s conditions. An alien is not bound by number or timing requirements for filing a motion to reopen if her request for relief “is based on changed country conditions arising in the country of nationality or the country to which removal has been ordered, if such evidence is material and was not available and would not have been discovered or presented at the previous proceeding.” 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Evidence presented by Keivani establishes that any policy of torturing or persecuting Christians in Iran preceded her initial hearing before the BIA. The fact that Keivani’s conversion made this fact more relevant to her case does not establish a “changed country condition,” as required by § 1229a. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Keivani’s motion to reopen. See Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 547, 550 (5th Cir. 2006). Keivani also argues that the BIA’s failure to consider her requests for nondiscretionary relief, in the forms of withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture, constituted a denial of due process. Because Keivani failed to raise this claim before the BIA, and because the BIA could have corrected any due process problem by granting the motion to reopen, the claim is unexhausted and this court is barred from considering it. Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004); Wang v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2001). Keivani’s petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M. Grier Eliasek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




/s/ M. Grier Eliasek


M. Grier Eliasek


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: September 27, 2019
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4794]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EXTENSION OF REMARKS

  By unanimous consent, permission to revise and extend remarks was 
granted to:
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Pallone) and to include 
extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Ackerman in two instances.
  Mr. Visclosky.
  Mr. Johnson of South Dakota.
  Mr. Hamilton.
  Mr. LaFalce.
  Mr. Poshard.
  Ms. Harman in three instances.
  Mr. Matsui.
  Mr. Foglietta.
  Mr. Coyne in two instances.
  Mr. Clay.
  Mr. Kildee.
  Ms. Kaptur.
  Mr. Manton.
  Mr. Torres.
  Mr. Reed.
  Mr. Richardson.
  Mr. Hall of Texas.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Hayworth) and to 
include extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Bryant of Tennessee.
  Mr. Fawell.
  Mr. Camp.
  Mr. Cooley.
  Mrs. Roukema.
  Mr. Bereuter.
  Mr. Davis in two instances.
  Mr. Wolf.
  Mr. Martini in two instances.
  Mr. Hyde.
  Mr. Radanovich.
  Mr. Walker.
  Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut.

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following 

unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. 

Date:  March 18, 2014 

  /s/ Brian T. Stevens 

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
SCWC-13-0002852

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

COLIN D. GARDNER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0002852; CASE NO. 2DTC-13-004202)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Colin D. Gardner’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on September 29, 2015, 

is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard 

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to 

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 10, 2015.

James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Artemio C. Baxa

for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0002852

10-NOV-2015

08:42 AM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6198]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          COMMONSENSE PRODUCT LIABIL- ITY AND LEGAL REFORM ACT

  The Senate resumed consideration of the bill.

       Pending:
       Gorton Amendment No. 596, in the nature of a substitute.

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The pending question is the Gorton amendment 
numbered 596 to the bill H.R. 956.
  In my capacity as a Senator from Minnesota, I suggest the absence of 
a quorum.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. SIMPSON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: November 19, 2007 

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Alabama AircraftIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(a) the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 19, 2007 

 

/s/ Randall C. Shealy
Randall C. ShealySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.





I, James Darrell Thomas, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:





(i) a review of HDCC’s activities for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and of HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2011 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2011-1, Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and





(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the name of and behalf of HDCC this 25th day of March, 2015.








By:/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryHarley-Davidson Credit Corp.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: September 22, 2016 522039 

________________________________

In the Matter of INJAH UNIQUE

TAFARI, Also Known as 

RICHARDO ORLANDO FOUST,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TINA M. STANFORD, as Chair of

the New York State Board 

of Parole, et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: August 8, 2016

Before: Lynch, J.P., Rose, Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Injah Unique Tafari, Elmira, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura

Etlinger of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Koweek, J.),

entered November 13, 2015 in Columbia County, which, in a

proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, denied petitioner's

motion to amend a prior order.

Petitioner brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging a September 2013 determination denying his request

for parole release and, in June 2014, Supreme Court issued an

order directing a de novo parole hearing. Petitioner was again

denied parole release at the end of that hearing in September

2014. Petitioner sought to challenge this denial via a pro se

motion to enforce the June 2014 order, but Supreme Court issued a

February 2015 order denying that motion. Petitioner appealed the
-2- 522039 

February 2015 order, which this Court dismissed as moot given his 

May 2015 reappearance before the Board of Parole (Matter of

Tafari v Stanford, 133 AD3d 1013 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 917

[2016]).

While his appeal of the February 2015 order was pending,

petitioner made a pro se motion to amend the June 2014 order. 

Before this motion was decided, the May 2015 determination

denying him parole release was administratively reversed and a de

novo parole hearing was conducted in August 2015 resulting in

another denial of parole release. Petitioner supplemented his

pro se motion accordingly. Supreme Court ultimately denied

petitioner's motion to amend and petitioner now appeals.

Based upon our review of the papers submitted by petitioner

in connection with his pro se motion, it is evident that,

although the motion is directed at the June 2014 order,

petitioner is essentially seeking to challenge the September 2014

and August 2015 determinations denying him parole release. 

Petitioner was obliged to pursue such challenges through separate

CPLR article 78 proceedings rather than through a motion to amend

Supreme Court's June 2014 order (see Matter of Tafari v Stanford,

133 AD3d at 1013). Therefore, the motion was properly denied. 

Lynch, J.P., Rose, Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that judgment is affirmed, without costs. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

March 15, 2017

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Enduro Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,

N.A., Trustee for Enduro Royalty Trust

 
| By:    | /s/   SARAH NEWELL                 |       |
|--------|------------------------------------|------------|
|   | **Sarah Newell**                   | ** ** |
|   | *Vice President and Trust Officer* | * *   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the six month period ended  June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         309
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               309
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          309
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       469,203
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,691)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                                  VERITEC, INC.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned, Van Tran, the Chief Executive Officer and Gerald Fors, the
Chief Financial Officer of Veritec, Inc. (the "Company"), individually, has
executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report").

     The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of December 31, 2006 (the last day of the period
          covered by this Report).

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certification as of
the 14th day of February, 2007.


                                        /s/ Van Thuy Tran
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Van Thuy Tran, Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Gerald Fors
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gerald Fors, Chief Financial Officer


                                       36
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2818 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2818

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to add physical 
  therapists to the list of providers allowed to utilize locum tenens 
                      arrangements under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2014

  Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Casey, and Mr. Moran) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to add physical 
  therapists to the list of providers allowed to utilize locum tenens 
                      arrangements under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prevent Interruptions in Physical 
Therapy Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING PHYSICAL THERAPISTS TO UTILIZE LOCUM TENENS 
              ARRANGEMENTS UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--The first sentence of section 1842(b)(6) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u(b)(6)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' before ``(H)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, and (I) in the case of outpatient physical 
        therapy services furnished by physical therapists, subparagraph 
        (D) of this sentence shall apply to such services and 
        therapists in the same manner as such subparagraph applies to 
        physicians' services furnished by physicians''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to services furnished after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```