alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 SecAF, CSAF direct review of all Air Force programsPublished Dec. 6, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alyssa C. Gibson
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force senior leaders have directed a Zero-Based Review of all Air Force programs, budget accounts and associated manpower authorizations in preparation for assembling the Fiscal Year 2020 Program Objective Memorandum and Future Years Defense Plan. 
The review will examine whether the right services are being provided the right way across the Air Force.
"We must optimally posture the United States Air Force to align with the new National Defense Strategy and Support Secretary [of Defense Jim] Mattis’ expressed lines of effort for the Department of Defense,” said Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein in a memo sent to the service Dec. 4, 2017. 
The purpose of the 2020 review is to maximize the application of the Air Force’s limited resources in order to increase the lethality of the force. 
“While the Air Force has updated its vision on strategy over the years, we have not conducted a zero-based program and budget review in over two decades,” the leaders said.
The memorandum also addressed the last 25 years of continuous Air Force combat operations, declining annual defense budgets and expectations for a more peaceful global environment. 
Wilson and Goldfein stressed that everything done during the review will be “on the table,” and that senior leaders will be expected to question the relevance of not only every requirement and program, but also how taxpayer dollars are spent. 
The Zero-Based Review will begin January 2018; results and recommendations are scheduled to be reported by March 15, 2018. Detailed guidance on the conduct of the review is forthcoming.SecAF 



CSAF 



Senior Leaders 



review 



programs 



budget 



Fiscal Year 2020 



National Defense Strategy 



resources 



strategy 



taxpayer dollars
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Exhibit 31.3



Certification of Chief Executive
Officer

of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)



I, Craig J. Faggen, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to the annual report on Form 10-K of Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”);



2) Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



Date: April 30, 2018



|/s/ Craig J. Faggen                                                                   | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Craig J. Faggen
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E934]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RECOGNITION OF JUDITH PISAR

                                 ______

                        HON. CHARLES E. SCHUMER

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 3, 1995
  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. Speaker, one of the pleasures of serving in this 
legislative body is the opportunity we occasionally get to acknowledge 
publicly the outstanding citizens of our Nation. I rise today to honor 
Judith Pisar in her installment as a Chevalier of the Legion of Honor 
in France, an honor she received on May 26, 1994. Ms. Pisar's 
contributions have led to building of a widely-admired cultural bridge 
between the United States and France and to Franco-American cultural 
relations in general.
  A native of New York, Ms. Pisar has spent the last two decades in 
Paris working for the American Center in Paris, a cultural center that 
houses contemporary American art. Founded 63 years ago, the American 
Center has helped bridge the gap of cultural differences between the 
United States and France. Under Ms. Pisar's direction, the American 
Center has expanded with a new building that was dedicated on June 4, 
1994. The new building will house a 420-seat theater, studios, a 
gallery, classrooms, and apartments for visiting artists and writers 
and will have space for an American restaurant.
  Ms. Pisar has also organized cultural, educational and charitable 
events for artists in France and the United States. She has put 
together exhibitions of young painters and a variety of multi-media 
events on both sides of the Atlantic.
  Mr. Speaker, it is no surprise that France has bestowed this high 
achievement to Ms. Pisar, a person dedicated to the cultural and 
intellectual education of our countries.
  Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this moment to ask my colleagues in 
the U.S. House of Representatives to join me in commending Ms. Judith 
Pisar for her valuable work. She is an inspiration to us all.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1995 and
condensed conolidated statement of income for the three months ended
December 31, 1995 and related footnotes and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000771790
<NAME> STEEL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (824)
<INVENTORY>                                     51,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,969
<PP&E>                                         133,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,346
<BONDS>                                         70,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,644
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,337
<SALES>                                         65,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,708
<CGS>                                           57,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.18
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Hill AFB fighter wings continue flying operations amid COVID-19 crisisPublished March 26, 2020
                        
                        By Todd Cromar
                        
                        
                        388th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                The active-duty 388th Fighter Wing and Reserve 419th Fighter Wing are continuing to train and fly the F-35A Lightning II despite the current global coronavirus outbreak.
There has been one confirmed case of COVID-19 on Hill Air Force base as of March 25.
As cases continue to spread in the U.S. and more guidelines and restrictions are put in place to prevent the spread of the disease, the wings implemented their own measures two weeks ago. The largest was segmented flying operations.
During segmented operations, the 421st Fighter Squadron, 4th Fighter Squadron and aircraft maintenance units are being rotated on a weekly basis. When not flying, Airmen are asked to stay at home to the maximum extent possible only going out for essentials: grocery shopping, medical appointments, physical-fitness activities with social distancing.
With the 34th Fighter Squadron already deployed, the work/restricted-movement schedule allows separation between groups of Airmen who may be needed to deploy at any time.
Common areas and shared equipment are also being routinely disinfected and new plane-side preparation procedures between pilots and crew chiefs have been implemented to follow social distancing guidelines.
The 388th FW and 419th FW are the Air Force's first combat-capable F-35A units. They fly and maintain the jet in a Total Force partnership, which capitalizes on the strength of both components.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Hill AFB 



COVID-19 



coronavirus 



Fighter Wing 



readiness 



flying 



operations 



ACC 



Air Combat Command 



F-35A 



Lightning II 



total force
#### Virginia M. Woolsey, respondent, *v.*Eugene Woolsey, appellant.

[Argued March 21st, 1911.

Decided June 19th, 1911.]

On appeal from a decree of the prerogative court made by the ordinary.

*Mr. Charles L.*Carrick, for the appellant.

Mr. *Sherrerd Depue,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the ordinary, reported *ante p. 517.*

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, VredenBURGH, CONGDON, SULLIVAN — 11.

*For reversal*— None.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD H. FORT.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 197 *N.J.Super.*113)
**EXHIBIT   13.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the  annual report of FLINT INT’L SERVICES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the yearended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.

 

 

Dated: December 23, 2013

 

/s/ Russell Hiebert

 

Name: Russell Hiebert

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Dated:  December 23, 2013

 

/s/ Russell Hiebert

 

Name: Russell Hiebert

Title: Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40174 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FRANK RIVERA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 886

- 1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Frank Rivera has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rivera h a s not filed a response. We ha ve reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 28, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40174 Document: 00513696664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2016No. 16

- 40174

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40174 Document: 00513696664 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2016
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7221** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:03

- cr - 00010

- RBS

- 1; 2:13

- cv - 00360

- RBS )

Submitted : September 10, 2013 Decided: October 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Terrence Cross seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard b y demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the dist rict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We h ave independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cross has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             395
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               739,985
<PP&E>                                          25,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 791,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,591,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,496
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   791,842
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,898
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  353,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (316,896)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (317,696)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the  annual report of FLINT INT’L SERVICES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the yearended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.

 

 

Dated:   May 15, 2014

 

/s/ Russell Hiebert

 

Name: Russell Hiebert

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Dated:  May    152014

 

/s/ Russell Hiebert

 

Name: Russell Hiebert

Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CALVIN CLAYTON.

Nov. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Mary J. Pettit v. The Muskegon Booming Company, Garnishee of William Squiers, Principal Defendant.

*Garnishment*— Corporations—Service—Exemption,

1. A book-keeper is not an officer or agent within the meaning of' Act No. 175, Laws of 1885, authorizing garnishee proceedings-against corporations, and has no power to appear for or bind such corporations in such proceedings,

2. The garnishee statute, exempting the wages of a “householder having a family” to the amount of §25, applies to a husband residing in this State, and who is supporting his family in Canada from his wages.

Error to Muskegon. (.Dickerman, J.)

Argued February 7, 1889.

Decided February 15, 1889.

Garnishment. Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

The-facts are stated in the opinion.

*Chaddock &*Sullivan, for appellant.

*DeLong & O’Hara,*for defendant.

Campbell, J.

This is a garnishee proceeding. Plaint*215iff sued "William Squiers as principal defendant before a justice, and got judgment for $1.35 damages, and $6.54 costs. Pending this suit an affidavit in garnishment was filed against defendant garnishee as owing Squiers. The sheriff returned that he had served this process on William Foster, assistant treasurer of defendant. . Foster appeared, and as book-keeper undertook to make a disclosure that defendant owed Squiers $13.04. After judgment in the principal cause, a process to show cause was directed to Foster as book-keeper. Defendant appeared, and attempted to show that it owed nothing to Squiers except for labor, and that he was head of a family, and. resided in Muskegon, where his family had been with, him, but whom he was supporting in Canada, out of his. wages. The justice held that the wages were not exempt, and also treated the disclosure as not open to amendment.

The statute does not provide that such an employé as-a book-keeper can represent the company so as to make it responsible. He is not an officer or agent, and has no power to appear for it, or to bind it. This would, dispose of the case alone, but we prefer to decide it on the more important ground that the statute exempts the wages of a “householder having a family” to the amount of $25. Squiers resided in Muskegon, and was head of a, family, whom he supported. We need not consider the case of persons who, with their families, are all non-resident. The term “householder” sometimes covers the case of a man without a family of wife or children who> keeps up a house, but it also embraces usually the head of an actual family dependent on him, whether housekeeping or not. No doubt many legal phrases may be construed differently, according to context and subject-matter. But the purpose of the exemption in the garnishee law is so plainly to enable husbands or other heads *216of families to support the family, as well as in case of house occupancy to meet its expenses, that no reasoning can make it plainer. The circuit court so held in reversing the justice’s judgment, and the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed, with costs. The record is peculiar in some other respects, but they need not be referred to.

The other Justices concurred.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: April 4Published April 4, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, the CMSAF addresses sexual assault awareness, an F-16 Fighting Falcon pilot reaches 1,000 combat flight hours, and a 380th Air Expeditionary Wing EQ-4 Global Hawk completes 1,000 continuous sorties without maintenance cancellations. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related stories:
- Stopping Sexual Assault – Not Just in April
- Pilot reaches milestone 1,000th combat hour
- 1000 and counting: deployed maintainers fight ISIS with Global Hawk consistencyATAF 



A1C Jasmine Vanderheyden 



Around the Air Force 



CMSAF 



Sexual Assault Awareness 



f-16 



Fighting Falcon 



EQ-4 Global Hawk 



380th AEW 



CMSAF Kaleth Wright