alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1
of Fleetmatics Group PLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James M. Travers, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Stephen Lifshatz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 22, 2015



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ James M. Travers                    
|    |  | James M. Travers Chief
Executive Officer

|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Stephen Lifshatz                    
|    |  | Stephen Lifshatz Chief
Financial Officer
Order filed January 11, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00200

- CR

____________ CEDRIC MAURICE JACKS ON , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 1190293



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T ex as R ule of App ellate P rocedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit #2

.

The clerk of the 185th District Court is directed to deliver to the Cler k of this court the original of State's Exhibit #2 , on or before January 19, 2012

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon c ompletion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit #2 , to the clerk of the 185th District Court.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E916]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             75TH ANNIVERSARY OF EMMANUEL COLLEGE OF BOSTON

                                 ______

                       HON. JOSEPH P. KENNEDY II

                            of massachusetts

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this 
moment to recognize Emmanuel College of Boston on its 75th anniversary. 
Emmanuel College was founded in 1919 by Sister Helen Madeleine Ingraham 
and the Sisters of Notre Dame.
  As the oldest women's Catholic college in New England, Emmanuel 
College's mission has been one of providing women with an outstanding 
liberal arts education rooted in Catholic heritage.
  Mr. Speaker, I wish the students, administrators, faculty, and 
alumnae of Emmanuel College a happy 75th anniversary and continued 
success in the future.

                          ____________________
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

p0129 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139839

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139839 COA: 293293 Bay CC: 06-010508-FH; 08-010998-FH TIMOTHY ALAN LEACH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 9, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 73 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6183]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       NOTICES OF HEARING CHANGE

               committee on energy and natural resources

  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the 
information of the Senate and the public that the nomination of Charles 
William Burton to be a member of the Board of Directors of the U.S. 
Enrichment Corporation will not be considered on Wednesday, May 10, 
1995, as previously announced.
  For further information, please call Camille Heninger at (202) 224-
5070.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4553]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, Rev. James David Ford, D.D., offered the following 
prayer:
  We are reminded during these days of the momentous occasion of the 
ending of conflict in Europe 50 years ago. As our thoughts go out in 
thanksgiving for the blessings of peace, we remember specially those 
members of our Armed Forces whose dedication and sacrifice brought new 
hope to so many people who had known destitution and suffering and 
death. We laud all those who labored for freedom and recall with praise 
their commitment and their allegiance to liberty. O gracious God, whose 
power created the Heavens and the Earth and whose grace is all about, 
may Your blessing be upon those who gave of themselves that others 
might live. In Your name, we pray. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

erry 

to demonstrate that the imposition of his original sentence was grossly 

disproportionate to the crime, Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-

01 (1991) (plurality opinion), or that the statute fixing punishment is 

unconstitutional, Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 

(1996). We also note that Law's sentence falls within the statutory limits. 

See NRS 193.330; NRS 205.220; NRS 205.222. Accordingly, we conclude 

that the sentence imposed does not constitute cruel and unusual 

punishment. 

Having considered Law's contentions and concluded that they 

are without merit, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

/ J. 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 273 

To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income 

Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock ownership 

plans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2013 

Ms. AYOTTE (for herself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mr. BLUNT) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock ownership plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIDUCIARY EXCLUSION. 

4 Section 3(21)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income 

5 and Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(21)(A)) is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘and except to the extent a person 

7 is providing an appraisal or fairness opinion with respect 

8 to qualifying employer securities (as defined in section 

9 407(d)(5)) included in an employee stock ownership plan 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 273 IS

1 (as defined in section 407(d)(6)),’’ after ‘‘subparagraph 

2 (B),’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 46 3- CR Antonio A. M AT A , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 38th J udicial District Court, Uvalde County , Texas

Trial Court No. 07-03-10,898- CR-A Honora ble Mark L

uitjen, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 29, 2008 DI SMI SSED Pursuant to a plea- barg ain ag ree ment, Antonio A
. Mata pled nolo c ontender e to murder and
wa s se nte nced to twe nty

y e ars of imp ri so nme nt i n a c c or da nc e wi th t

he te rm s o f h is p le a -b a rg a in
a g re e me nt. Th e tr ia l c ou

rt sig ne d a ce rt if

ic a tio n of de fe nd ant’ s rig ht to ap pe a l sta tin g that this “i s a plea- barg ain case , and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appe al.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)( 2). Afte r Mata filed a

notice of a

ppeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appea l04
- 08
- 00 46 3- CR

- 2- to this court. See id. 25.2(e) . The c lerk’s r ecor d, which includes the trial court’ s rule 25.2 (a)(2)
cer tification, has bee n filed. See id. 25.2(d). “In a plea barg ain case ... a defenda nt may appea l only : (A) those matters that wer e ra ised by wri tt en mo ti on fi le d a

nd ru le d o n b e fo re tr ia l, o r ( B ) a ft e r g e tti ngthe tr ia l c ourt ’s pe rm iss ion to appea l.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)( 2). The c lerk’s r ecor d, which co n tains a written plea barg ain, establishes the punishment assesse d by the court does not exceed the punishment recommende d by the prosec utor and ag ree d to by the def endant. See id. 25.2(a) (2). The cler k’s re cord doe s not include
a wr itt e n mo tio n f

ile d a nd ru le d u po n b e fo re tr ia l; n or

do e s it ind ic a te that th e tr ial co ur t g a ve its pe rm iss ion to a

pp e a l. Th e tr ia l c ourt ’s c e rt if ic a tio n, the re fo re , a

pp e ars to a c c ur a te ly

re fl e c t th a t th is is a ple a -b arg a in c a se and

tha t Mata do e s no t have a

ri g ht t o a pp e a l. We mus t di smi ss a n a pp e a l “ if
a cer tification that shows the defe ndant has the rig ht of appea l ha s not be en made part of the re cord.” Id. 25.2(d). We, theref

ore, w arne d Mata that this appea l would be dis missed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 25.2(d), unless a n amende d trial court c ertification sh o w in g that he had the rig ht to appea l was made part of the appellate rec ord. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( d) , 3 7. 1; Da nie ls v . S tat e , 110 S.W .3d 174 (Tex. A

pp.—San Antonio 2003, order ). No such ame nded trial c ourt ce rtification has bee n filed. This appe al is, theref ore, dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d).

PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
News United States Air Force
 Offutt AFB battling flood watersPublished March 18, 2019
                        
                        
                        55th Wing Public Affairs
                **OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AFNS) --**
                Like large portions of Nebraska, Offutt Air Force Base personnel are battling flood waters which started to creep onto the installation March 15.
An increase in water levels upstream due to a record-setting snowfall this winter, in addition to a huge drop in air pressure earlier in the week, has overwhelmed the southeastern side of the base with water from the Missouri River and Papio Creek.
“Team Offutt has done an incredible job working together to battle this historic flood as best we can,” said Col. Michael Manion, 55th Wing commander. “We can’t thank our on-base mission partners enough for their support through this as well as officials from the City of Bellevue, the city of LaVista, Sarpy County, the state of Nebraska and the Omaha Public Power District.”
Base officials evacuated the base lake early Friday and personnel worked around the clock to fortify facilities with more than 235,000 sandbags and 460 flood barriers to minimize damage as much as possible.
All streets south and east of the Offutt Field House are impassible with water reaching approximately 30 buildings including the headquarters facilities of the 55th Wing, 55th Security Forces Squadron, 97th Intelligence Squadron, 343rd Reconnaissance Squadron as well as the Bennie L. Davis maintenance facility among others.
“Our team worked as rapidly as possible to improve water defenses around critical infrastructure,” Manion said.
In addition, portions of the flightline are covered with water and multiple aircraft have been evacuated to other locations.
The STRATCOM Gate is also closed at this time due to water crossing the road. In response, the 55th SFS is utilizing the Meyer Gate for cargo and construction traffic and is expected to open the Bellevue Gate full time on March 18.
“We’re requesting everyone’s patience as we work through this together,” Manion said. “Our defenders are working hard to keep everyone safe, so please obey all traffic control point personnel.”Air Force 



flood 



AF 



weather 



STRATCOM 



water 



Strategic Command 



Missouri River 



Papio Creek 



Offutt AFB 



flooding 



2019 Flood 



55th Wing 



Offutt Air Force Base
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEROY LEWIS.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
FREDERICK BARRETT

,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON

OFFENDER REVIEW

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPO SITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0160

Opinion filed September 14, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Frederick Barrett, pro se

, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counse l, Florida

Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T Dec . 09, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
N o

. 0 8

- 1 6 2 0 7 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 9 2

- 0 0 1 0 4

- C R

- O R L

- 1 9 K R S

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

K I R K W H I T T A K E R ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( D e c e m b e r 9 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e D U B I N A , C h i e f J u d g e , P R Y O R a n d F A Y , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.

P E R C U R I A M :

T h o m a s H

. D a l e , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r K i r k W h i t t a k e r i n t h i s a p p e a l f r o mt h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e n i a l o f W h i t t a k e r ’ s m o t i o n t o v a c a t e h i s s e n t e n c e f o r l a c k o f
j u r i s d i c t i o n , h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e a p p e l l a n t

a n d f i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8

L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e

i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t ,

c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e n i a l o f

W h i t t a k e r ’ s m o t i o n i s A F F I R M E D

.

2
WHEREAS Precision Standard, Inc., 1225 17th Street, Suite 1800, Denver,
Colorado 80202, USA owns all shares in Pemco World Air Services A/S (reg.
no. 215.372),

WHEREAS, there exists a current account between Precision Standard, Inc.
and Pemco World Air Services which at present shows that Pemco World Air
Services A/S is indebted to Precision Standard, Inc. in the amount of
approximately USD 1.4 mio,

WHEREAS the paid-up share capital of Pemco World Air Services A/S is DKK
600.000,00,

WHEREAS Precision Standard, Inc. has extended the above mentioned credit
to Pemco World Air Services A/S in order that it should be able to
continue its operations,

IT HAS BEEN AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

                                    1.

In respect of the account current between Precision Standard, Inc. (incl.
affiliated companies) and Pemco World Air Services A/S, Precision
Standard, Inc. hereby agrees that the account current outstanding in
Precision Standard, Inc.'s favour at anyone time shall be subordinated to
all other creditors of Pemco World Air Services A/S.

                                    2.

Precision Standard, Inc. hereby guarantees a capitalization of Pemco World
Air Services A/S up to, but not exceeding the registered share capital of
DKK 600.000,00.

                                    3.

Precision Standard, Inc. hereby undertakes to provide Pemco World Air
Services A/S with sufficient funds to enable Pemco World Air Services A/S
to conduct its business.

                                    4.

This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
Danish Law.  Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this
agreement shall be referred to the Maritime and Commercial Court in
Copenhagen.


Date:  29/5  1997


/s/Matthew L. Gold
Precision Standard, Inc.
Matthew L. Gold
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1017]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      COMMEMORATING THE 80TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

                                 ______

                               speech of

                           HON. STEPHEN HORN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. HORN. Mr. speaker, eighty years ago the world watched in horror 
as one of the most tragic, savage periods in modern history--the 
destruction of the Armenian culture by the Ottoman Empire in what later 
became the Republic of Turkey--unfolded. Between 1915 and 1923, over 
1.5 million Armenian men, women, and children were systematically 
murdered by Ottoman leaders. Millions more were driven from lands that 
they and their ancestors had occupied for centuries. By 1923, the 
Armenian culture had been almost completely eradicated within the 
confines of what is now modern-day Turkey. hat had once been a thriving 
Armenian populace of more than 2.5 million human beings in 1915, 
numbers around 80,000 today.
  Racial/ethnic hatred was the reason for this brutal genocide--as it 
was in the Nazi death camps of Auschwitz and Dachau whose 50th 
liberation anniversary we are honoring this year. And therein lies one 
of the most important reasons that the world must never forget this 
shameful event. As we watch in horror at today's racial and ethnic 
atrocities in Bosnia and Rwanda, and as we remember the all too recent 
slaughter of one million Cambodians under the evil rule of Pol Pot, and 
as we listen in disgust to the racial hatred being preached by 
Americans of various racial and ethnic backgrounds, we must use this 
tragic anniversary of the Armenian Genocide to renew our efforts to 
make sure that any and all genocide atrocities never again occur. This 
is our memorial to those one and a half million human beings who were 
lost in the Armenian Genocide.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4788]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California [Mr. Becerra] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. BECERRA addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IVAX
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              96,280
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      119,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21,370
<INVENTORY>                                        151,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   372,047
<PP&E>                                             397,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                     172,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     665,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              253,704
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15,578
<OTHER-SE>                                         360,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       665,844
<SALES>                                            160,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   181,889
<CGS>                                               93,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       93,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     31,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 25,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        25,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .16


</TABLE>