alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 13, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40690 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO REYES, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-735-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Reyes, Sr., appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute a quantity exceeding 50 kilograms of marihuana. Reyes argues that the record is insufficient to establish that he was competent to plead guilty in light of his having suffered severe depression and attempted suicide in 1998. He asserts that when the district court received notice of these facts, which were contained in the PSR, the court should have sua sponte invalidated his guilty pleaNo. 03-40690 -2- and ordered a competency hearing. He also notes that he experienced pain from a prior surgical procedure involving his neck and back and that he took pain medication to relieve his symptoms. Additionally, Reyes contends that his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to inquire prior to rearraignment whether Reyes had any history of mental illness. At rearraignment, Reyes responded negatively to the district court’s question regarding whether he had any mental health problems. The district court raised the issue sua sponte at sentencing, noting that the PSR stated that Reyes had attempted suicide. Reyes stated that he had been released from medical treatment. Although Reyes had pain medication to help him treat symptoms from neck and back surgery, he stated that he was not taking this medication at the time of sentencing, and he did not challenge the voluntariness of his guilty plea. Reyes’ counsel stated that, based on his conversations with Reyes, he had no reason to doubt Reyes’ competency. There is no evidence in the record that Reyes had a history of irrational behavior, nor is there evidence of prior medical opinions regarding competency. Under these circumstances, the district court’s determination to proceed with sentencing was not clearly arbitrary or unwarranted.
See United States v. Davis , 61 F.3d 291, 304 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Birdsell , 775 F.2d 645, 648 (5th Cir. 1985). The evidence does not show that Reyes was unable to understandNo. 03-40690 -3- the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to properly assist in his own defense. See Godinez v. Moran , 509 U.S. 389, 396 (1993). Because the record regarding ineffective assistance is not adequately developed, we dismiss this issue without prejudice to Reyes’ ability to raise it in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See United States v. Brewster , 137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
Order filed July 12, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00362-CV

____________

JOHN EMMANUEL D/B/A FIRST AMERICO AUTO SALE & REPAIR, 

Appellant

V.

ABIGAIL IZOUKUMOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 98th District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-17-006205

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due June 14, 2019. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before July 17, 2019, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 35.1




SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





For the period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, the servicing of consumer finance receivables owned by BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2011-1 has been conducted by BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, in its capacity as servicer, in compliance with the servicing standards in all material respects, set forth in Article II of the Servicing Supplement dated April 21, 2011.  To the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Dated:  March 20, 2013




BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
/s/ Joachim HenselName:
Joachim HenselTitle:
Vice President – Finance & CFO
#### Lionel C. Simpson Plumbing and Heating Company, respondent, v. Edward Geschke, appellant.

[Submitted December 5th, 1910.

Decided March 6th, 1911.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in *76 N. J. Eq. (6 Buch.) 475.*

*Mr. Howard L. Miller,*for the respondent.

*Mr. Ralph W. E. Dongas,*for the appellant.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning.

*For affirmance*— Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze. Reed, Trenciiakd, Parker, Bergen, ARioehees, Mjnturn, Bogert, ATjedenburgh, Vroom, Congdon — 13.

*For reversal*— None.

*307CASES ADJUDGED IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY or THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, FEBRUARY TERM, 1911.
News United States Air Force
 AFMETCAL updates NextGenPublished April 24, 2019
                        
                        By Brian Brackens
                        
                        
                        Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs
                **HEATH, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Metrology and Calibration Division recently released an update to its in-house developed NextGen software program.
The updates included fixes to software bugs and automated support capability for pieces of old and new Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment.
NextGen calibrates or verifies that measurement tools Airmen use in a variety of career fields are accurate and working properly.
For example, the software certifies the accuracy of devices in aircraft that measures the distance of the plane from the ground and that radar and communications systems work correctly.
NextGen is used worldwide at all Air Force Precision Measurement Laboratories along with the Air Force Primary Standards Lab and supports more than 25,000 calibrations each year.
One of the benefits of NextGen is that it has helped eliminate human error and standardized processes in calibration.
“NextGen has made procedures more repeatable so every person who runs the calibration will do the exact same thing because the software is driving it,” said Rob Eberts, NextGen program lead. “It also helps save time.”
With the software, calibration times have been reduced by up to 90 percent, and calibrations that previously would have taken three days to complete are now being done in three hours, added Barry Mancz, lead electronics engineer for AFMETCAL.
“It is absolutely vital to have TMDE calibrated,” Mancz said. “It ensures that missiles land where they are supposed to, planes take off and land correctly, that planes have enough fuel and are going in the right direction while in the air. Calibration ensures the safety and precision of the warfighter.”
AFMETCAL is organized under the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Agile Combat Support Directorate and is responsible for the development and sustainment of the Air Force’s precision measurement capabilities, ensuring the accuracy of air and space system performance.LR 



AFMETCAL 



NextGen 



Air Force Metrology and Calibration Division 



software update 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



Agile Combat Support 



TMDE 



Test Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment 



innovation 



readiness 



Lethality 



AF 



AFLCMC 



Air Force Precision Measurement Laboratories 



Air Force Primary Standards Lab
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Rolando Escajeda, Jr.

, * From the 161st District Court

o f Ector County,

Trial Court No

. B

- 21

- 0424

- CR

Vs. No. 11

- 21

- 00 2 82

- CR * August 4, 2022

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### KONSTANTINOS VELMOHOS v. MAREN ENGINEERING CORPORATION.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification granted. (See 168 *N.J.Super.*520)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

407 

CA 12-01500 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

JAMES P. ZETES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KELLY A. STEPHENS AND LUCAS A. STEPHENS, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, 

COUNTY OF NIAGARA, JAMES VOUTOUR, IN HIS 

CAPACITY AS NIAGARA COUNTY SHERIFF, AND GUY 

FRATELLO, ALSO KNOWN AS G. FRATELLO, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS NIAGARA 

COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF, DEFENDANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (EARL K. CANTWELL, II, OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

JOHN J. DELMONTE, NIAGARA FALLS, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County

(Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered April 4, 2012. The order

denied the motion of defendants Kelly A. Stephens and Lucas A.

Stephens for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by granting those parts of the motion

of defendants Kelly A. Stephens and Lucas A. Stephens for summary

judgment dismissing the second, third, fourth, and ninth causes of

action and so much of the tenth cause of action as alleges tortious

interference with contractual relations and as modified the order is

affirmed without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in Zetes v Stephens ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [July 5, 2013]).

Entered: July 5, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2917 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2917

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To expand the program of priority review to encourage treatments for 
                           tropical diseases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority 
Review Voucher Program Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY REVIEW TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS FOR TROPICAL DISEASES.

    Section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360n) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraph (Q) as 
                subparagraph (R);
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (P) the 
                following:
                    ``(Q) Filoviruses.''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (R), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``regulation by'' and inserting ``order of''; 
                and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by adding ``There is no limit 
                on the number of times a priority review voucher may be 
                transferred before such voucher is used.'' after the 
                period at the end; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ``365 days'' and 
                inserting ``90 days''.

            Passed the Senate December 2, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2917

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To expand the program of priority review to encourage treatments for 
                           tropical diseases.
```
News United States Air Force
 Arctic Challenge Exercise 21: Strengthening Nordic RelationshipsPublished June 2, 2021
                        
                        By U.S. Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa Public Affairs
                **ROVANIEMI AIR BASE, Finland (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Air Force Reserve **KC-135 Stratotankers** and Airmen assigned to the **459th Air Refueling Wing**,**Joint Base Andrews**, Maryland, arrived at Rovaniemi Air Base June 2 to support Arctic Challenge Exercise 21, a Royal Norwegian Air Force-led exercise, scheduled to take place in the Nordic countries of Sweden, Finland, and Norway.
In addition, U.S. Air Force KC-135s and Airmen assigned to the **100th Air Refueling Wing**, **Royal Air Force Mildenhall**, United Kingdom, will support the exercise from their home station. U.S. Air Force F-16C and F-16D **Fighting Falcons** and Airmen assigned to the **52nd Fighter Wing**, **Spangdahlem Air Base**, Germany will also participate from Kallax, Sweden. Airmen assigned to the 435th Contingency Response Group, **Ramstein AB**, Germany, and the Multinational Aircrew Live-synthetic-blended Training System, assigned to U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa Warrior Preparation Center, 19th Electronic Warfare Squadron, are also scheduled to support from Kallax, Sweden.
Exercises like ACE 21 build interoperability with allies and partners to demonstrate capability and convey a strong deterrent message. During the exercise, U.S., allied and partner nations will exercise the ability to plan, execute and evaluate large force employments in a multinational air operation.
“Arctic Challenge is a premiere exercise that strengthens relationships and builds security as we train with our Nordic partners,” said **Gen. Jeff Harrigian**, **U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa** commander.
ACE 21 provides participating units the ability to train with allies and partners in all possible aspects of air operations. Units will focus on offensive and defensive scenarios consisting of air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. Along with Norway and the U.S., Swedish, Finnish, Danish, Dutch, German, NATO and U.K. aircraft are scheduled to participate in the exercise.
This exercise has been conducted every other year since 2013 and is not associated with any current events.
Ensuring coordination with Arctic allies, regional partners and the joint force is critical. Seven out of eight Arctic nations are NATO members or Enhanced Opportunity Partners and hold a wealth of experience operating in the High North.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Arctic Challenge 



KC-135 Stratotanker 



459th ARW 



USAFE-AFAFRICA 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa 



mission 



training 



joint 



JB Andrews 



Rovaniemi Air Base 



Reserve 



Norway 



Sweden 



Finland 



ACE21 



RAF Mildenhall 



52nd FW
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201202-003.                

*Title:*                     Oakland MTO Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Eagle Marine Services, Ltd.; Ports of America Outer Harbor Terminal, LLC; Seaside Transportation Service LLC; SSA Terminals, LLC; SSA Terminals (Oakland), LLC; Total Terminals International, LLC; and Trapac, Inc.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street, NW.; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment deletes Transbay Container Terminal, LLC as a party to the agreement.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: September 10, 2010.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-22996 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
News United States Air Force
 Multinational JTACs integrate in Red Flag-AlaskaPublished June 20, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Isaac Johnson
                        
                        
                        354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AFNS) --**
                During exercise Red Flag-Alaska 19-2, U.S. Air Force tactical air control party joint terminal attack controllers assigned to the 116th Air Support Operations Squadron partnered with JTACs from the British Army and the South Korean air force.
Throughout the exercise, they shared tactics, techniques and procedures regarding close air support, enabling them to work together more efficiently in the future if the need arises.
“One of the biggest differences between us and the United Kingdom JTACs is that theirs are in the Army,” said U.S. Air Force Senior Master Sgt. Cory Welton, 116th ASOS JTAC. “Having them here allows us to learn more about how they do things in the British Army as well as teach them how U.S. Air Force JTACs accomplish the same job.”
Close air support involves aircraft pilots in the air providing direct support to JTACs on the ground and requires precise communication between the two to be successful. Although the basic concept of close air support is the same for members of all three nations’ armed forces, sharing specific tactics, practicing with multiple airframes and observing each other’s procedures allow all personnel involved to incorporate new strategies and learn to work together more effectively.
“Here at (Red Flag-Alaska) we’ve gotten a lot of good experience working with our coalition partners,” said British Army Staff Sgt. Robert Leonard, British Army Headquarters 1st Artillery Brigade JTAC. “Being able to observe and participate in the coordination of CAS with coalition aircraft allows us to get very realistic training.”
During the two-week exercise, JTACs from all three countries had opportunities to coordinate with pilots operating several different aircraft such as U.S. A-10s and F-16s, as well as Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-2s. The close air support training served as an integral part of exercising multi-domain operations, where members of the U.S. Air Force, British Army and South Korean air force enhanced their ability to work together in future contingencies.Air Force 



close air support 



exercise 



training 



AF 



JTAC 



Eielson AFB 



Red Flag-Alaska 



joint terminal attack controllers 



Japan Air Self-Defense Force 



South Korean Air Force 



British Army 



LR
Created on: July 14, 2020 

# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 19

- 00626

- CR

Vance Lee MASTERS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19

- 89

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 5, 2020.

_________________________ ____ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
# Directing Certain Actions with Respect to Acquisition and Use of Thomson Correctional Center to Facilitate Closure of Detention Facilities at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the Attorney General 

By the authority vested in me as President and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40, 115 Stat. 224), and in order to facilitate the closure of detention facilities at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, I hereby direct that the following actions be taken as expeditiously as possible with respect to the facility known as the Thomson Correctional Center (TCC) in Thomson, Illinois:

1. The Attorney General shall acquire and activate the TCC as a United States Penitentiary, which the Attorney General has determined would reduce the Bureau of Prisons' shortage of high security, maximum custody cell space and could be used for other appropriate inmate or detainee management purposes. The Attorney General shall also provide to the Department of Defense a sufficient portion of the TCC to serve as a detention facility to be operated by the Department of Defense in order to accommodate the relocation of detainees by the Secretary of Defense in accordance with paragraph 2 of this memorandum.

2. The Secretary of Defense, working in consultation with the Attorney General, shall prepare the TCC for secure housing of detainees currently held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base who have been or will be designated for relocation, and shall relocate such detainees to the TCC, consistent with laws related to Guantanamo detainees and the findings in, and interagency Review established by, Executive Order 13492 of January 22, 2009.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                    The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2010-227

Billing code 5001-06-M