alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pinafore Holdings B.V.





Exhibit 8.1

Principal trading subsidiaries of the Company as at December 31, 2013

Details of the Companys principal trading subsidiaries as at December 31, 2013 are set out below. Each entity is 100% owned by the Group unless otherwise stated.



Aquatic Co.

(USA)Conexiones Hidraulics, S.A. de C.V.

(Mexico)Eifeler Maschinenbau GmbH

(Germany)Gates (U.K.) Limited

(Scotland)Gates Argentina SA

(Argentina)Gates Australia Pty Ltd

(Australia)Gates Canada Inc.

(Canada)Gates CIS LLC

(Russia)Gates de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

(Mexico)Gates do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda

(Brazil)Gates E & S North America, Inc.

(USA)Gates Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

(China)Gates Engineering & Services Australia Pte. Ltd.

(Australia)Gates Engineering & Services FZCO

(UAE)Gates Engineering & Services Hamriyah FZE

(UAE)Gates Engineering & Services Pte. Ltd.

(Singapore)Gates Europe BVBA

(Belgium)Gates Fluid Power Technologies (Changzhou) Co. Ltd.

(China)Gates France S.a.r.l

(France)Gates GmbH

(Germany)Gates Hydraulics Limited

(England)Gates Hydraulics s.r.o.

(Czech Republic)Gates India Private Limited

(India)Gates Mectrol GmbH

(Germany)Gates Mectrol, Inc.

(USA)Gates Polska Sp.zo.o.

(Poland)


Gates PT Spain SA

(Spain)Gates Rubber Company (S) Pte. Ltd

(Singapore)Gates S.A.S

(France)Gates S.r.l.

(Italy)The Gates Corporation

(USA)Gates Güç Aktarim Sistemleri Dagitim Sanayi Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi

(Turkey)Gates Powertrain Plastik Metal ve Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi(50% owned)

(Turkey)Gates Korea Company, Ltd.(51% owned)

KoreaGates Unitta (Thailand) Co. Ltd.(51% owned)

(Thailand)Gates Unitta Asia Kabushikikaisha(51% owned)

(JapanGates Unitta Asia Trading Company Pte. Ltd.(51% owned)

(Singapore)Gates Unitta India Company Private Limited(51% owned)

(India)Gates Unitta Korea Co. Ltd.(51% owned)

(Korea)Gates Unitta Power Transmission (Shanghai) Ltd(51% owned)

(China)Gates Unitta Power Transmission (Suzhou) Ltd.(51% owned)

(China)Gates Winhere Automotive Pump Products (Yantai) Co. Ltd.(60% owned)

(China)
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Agility Prime, a New Way to Monitor COVID-19 and Colin Powell Talks LeadershipPublished May 8, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Timmethy James and Senior Airman Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force highlights the Air Force’s virtual launch of Agility Prime, the Air Force Research Laboratory adopts a new way to monitor COVID-19, and Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Kaleth Wright interviews retired Gen. Colin Powell. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Timmethy James and Senior Airman Angelo Rosario)





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- AFRL adapts pararescue tactics for COVID-19 monitoring
- Agility Prime to hold virtual launch eventFeatured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Agility Prime 



COVID-19 



BATDOK 



Gen. Colin Powell 



Colin Powell 



CMSAF 



Chief Wright 



Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         11,230
<SECURITIES>                                   1,550
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,826
<INVENTORY>                                    3,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,897
<PP&E>                                         5,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,267)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,885
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       33
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,076
<SALES>                                        20,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,216
<CGS>                                          10,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.71
        


</TABLE>
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3274

___________

Brenda Crawford, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Boone County, Missouri; O.J. Stone, * Western District of Missouri 

individually & in his capacity as an *

employee of the Boone Cty. Sheriff&s * [UNPUBLISHED]

Dep't., *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 4, 1999

 Filed: March 26, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Crawford appeals from the final judgment entered in the United States

District Court1 for the Western District of Missouri. The district court granted

summary judgment to defendants in Crawford&s employment discrimination action,
-2-

in which Crawford claimed that defendants sexually harassed and subjected her to

disparate treatment based on her sex and age, in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. 

After de novo review, see Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 88 F.3d 672,

674 (8th Cir. 1996), we conclude summary judgment was proper because Crawford

failed to file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) within 300 days of any alleged discriminatory employment

practice, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e); Hanenburg v. Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co., 118

F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir. 1997) (plaintiff may not assert Title VII claim unless she has

filed timely EEOC charge); cf.Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 130 F.3d 1287, 1302-

03 (8th Cir. 1997) (alleged violation may be deemed continuing where plaintiff

challenges ongoing pattern or practice of discrimination, but plaintiff must establish

violation existed during statutory period), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 2370 (1998). We

agree with the district court that Crawford failed to show circumstances that

warranted equitable tolling of the 300-day filing period. See Baldwin County

Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984) (per curiam) (listing four

circumstances that warrant equitable tolling); Miller v. Runyon, 32 F.3d 386, 390 (8th

Cir. 1994) (reviewing for clear error district court’s findings of facts underlying

equitable tolling claim). 

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We deny plaintiff&s and defendants’

pending motions on appeal.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-3-
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  Encompass  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ended  September  30, 2004 as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report")
the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 30, 2006               ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE I. HANDLER
                                 --------------------------
                                 Leslie I. Handler, President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4542]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED

  By unanimous consent, permission to address the House, following the 
legislative program and any special orders heretofore entered, was 
granted to:
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Durbin) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous matter:)
  Ms. Kaptur, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. LaFalce, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Owens, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Hoyer, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mrs. Schroeder, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Miller of California, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Durbin, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Duncan) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Fields of Texas, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Duncan, for 5 minutes, today.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Air Expeditionary Wings, Data Sharing, ALS Online, and Energy AwarenessPublished Oct. 23, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Timmethy James
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force highlights the Air Force’s testing of lead Air Expeditionary Wings, an historic data sharing agreement between the Department of Defense and Academia, online Airman Leadership School and Energy Awareness Month. (Produced by Staff Sgt. Timmethy James)
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:-AGILE FLAG 21-1
-Historic agreement opens defense data to academia
- Air University’s Barnes Center begins beta-testing for ALS DLC
- Department of the Air Force Recognizes Energy Awareness MonthFeatured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Lead Wings 



Air Expeditionary Wings 



data 



data sharing 



DOD 



industry 



academia 



AI 



artificial intelligence 



Future Warfare 



ALS 



Airman Leadership School 



online 



Air University 



Energy Awareness 



Energy Awareness Month 



October
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

#  Travis AFB firefighters help community battle Solano wildfires

              - Published  Aug. 26, 2020
              -                             By Nicholas Pilch                                                    
              - 60th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs

**TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --  **
Airmen from **Travis Air Force Base**’s 60th Civil Engineer Squadron responded to the LNU Lightning Complex fire to support the Vacaville Fire Protection District’s firefighting effort, Aug. 19.The fire started in Napa, California as the result of a lightning storm, and quickly spread through the area to Vacaville and Fairfield ­­– both of which border Travis AFB. Tens of thousands of people were forced to evacuate their homes in Napa and Solano counties through the duration of the day.In the early hours of Aug. 19th, Travis AFB initially dispatched a four-person crew to the Cherry Glenn area to safeguard homes. Over the course of the next 48 hours, the base dispatched 28 firefighters with **Beale AFB** contributing an additional eight firefighters, four from a specialty wildfire unit. The 36 firefighters were dispatched to 10 locations.“A lot of the fire was not directly near the road,” said Kevin Bouillon, 60th CES battalion chief. “The crews had to connect hoses together that reached as long as a thousand feet because the fire needed to be extinguished.”The 60th CES dispatched five trucks in total, one normally being a specialty truck used to put out fires on aircraft.“Containing the fire is difficult because winds shifted later in the day,” said Staff Sgt. James Muncy, 60th CES crew chief. “Trees were falling, and various fires were reigniting.”Muncy also said the fire needed as much containment as possible, so more crews dispatched from Travis AFB.Ricardo Campos, 60th CES captain, and his crew were initially dispatched near Interstate 80; however, they were re-routed to prevent the destruction of a neighborhood near Sales Lane in Fairfield.“If the fire broke through, there it would’ve been possible for that fire to take out acres of land passing through those residences and would destroy possibly hundreds of acres of residential homes past it,” Campos said.As of Aug. 21, firefighters from across the county are actively trying to contain the fire in Napa and Solano counties.“A fire this size, there is no way you can contain it in a day,” said Bouillon. “The ongoing relationship with the local stations allows us to assist in working a fire like this.”

LRUSAFAFAir Forcewildfiresfirefightingemergency responseFire DepartmentfirefighterTravis AFBAMCAir Mobility Command
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,259]


Dupont Teijin Films Including On-Site Leased Workers From 
Schenkers Logistics, Inc., Florence, SC; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 22, 2009, applicable to workers of DuPont Teijin Films, 
including on-site leased workers from Schenkers Logistics, Inc., 
Florence, South Carolina (subject firm). The Department's notice was 
published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2009 (74 FR 59255). 
Workers are engaged in employment related to the production of 
polyester (PET) film.
    On our own motion, the Department reviewed the certification 
applicable to the workers of the subject firm.
    The Department's review shows that the subject firm was publicly 
identified by name by the International Trade Commission in an 
investigation resulting in a category of determination that is listed 
in Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(f). That determination was 
published in the Federal Register on November 6, 2008 and is within one 
year of the date of the TAA petition. Therefore, the Department is 
amending the impact date to read November 6, 2007 and the expiration 
date to read November 6, 2009.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,259 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of DuPont Teijin Films, including on-site leased 
workers of Schenkers Logistics, Inc., Florence, South Carolina, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
November 6, 2007, through November 6, 2009, are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade 
Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 30th day of August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-22720 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[No. 24217-6-II.

Division Two.

May 19, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Paul B. Ponischil, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 98-1-00297-5, David E. Foscue, J., entered December 7, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J, concurred in by Seinfeld and Bridgewater, JJ.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3007 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend the application 

of the Medicare payment rate floor to primary care services furnished 

under Medicaid and to apply the rate floor to additional providers of 

primary care services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend 

the application of the Medicare payment rate floor to 

primary care services furnished under Medicaid and to 

apply the rate floor to additional providers of primary 

care services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Enhanced 

5 Access to Primary Care Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3007 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF APPLICATION OF MEDICARE PAY2 MENT RATE FLOOR TO PRIMARY CARE SERV3 ICES FURNISHED UNDER MEDICAID AND AP4 PLICATION TO ADDITIONAL PROVIDERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(13)(C) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(13)(C)) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘in 2013 and 2014’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘on or after January 1, 2013, and before Janu10 ary 1, 2017,’’; and 

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘neurology, psychiatry, obstet12 rics and gynecology,’’ after ‘‘general internal medi13 cine,’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1905(dd) 

15 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(dd)) is 

16 amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2015’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘January 1, 2017’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to items and services furnished on 

20 or after the first day of the first calendar quarter that 

21 begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDG Environmental, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd B.
Fortier Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Todd B. Fortier


Todd B. Fortier
Chief Financial Officer

December 14, 2005



                                       32
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas E. Beier, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IVAX Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003