alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Heritage Flight honors D-DayPublished June 7, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Tristan Biese
                        
                        
                        633rd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The U.S. Air Force Heritage Flightteam conducted a flyover in honor of the 75th anniversary of D-Day and the last celebration at the National D-Day Memorial in Bedford, Virginia, June 6, 2019.
The four-ship formation included Maj. Paul Lopez, F-22 Raptor Demonstration Team pilot, Maj. Garret Schmitz, F-16 Viper Demonstration Team pilot, Capt. Andrew Olson, F-35 Lightning II Demonstration Team pilot and Andrew McKenna, Air Force Heritage Flight Foundation P-51 Mustang pilot.
“The Heritage Flight team gives people the chance to see a visual representation of Air Force air power,” Lopez said. “It shows the past, present and future in the aircraft that we fly. Flying in formation with the P-51 over Bedford is an honor to those who came before us and it’s truly humbling.”
During the flyover the team performed the missing man formation. This formation is an aerial salute performed by aircraft at funerals or memorial events, typically in memory of a fallen pilot, a well-known military service member or veteran, or a well-known political figure.
“To be able to represent the Air Force and all the men and women of the Air Force is an incredible honor,” Olson said. “Thank you to all those that gave their lives on D-Day 75 years ago and the surviving members who are still out there. We hope to make you proud.”
By showcasing the Airmen and combat advances made by the United States Air Force, the Heritage Flight team aims to educate and inform the American public on what the Air Force of tomorrow has to offer.ACC 



Air Combat Command 



Heritage Flight 



D-Day 



JB Langley-Eustis 



memorial 



Flyover 



AF 



Air Force 



F-22 Raptor Demonstration Team 



pilot 



F-16 Viper Demonstration Team 



F-35 Lightning II Demonstration Team 



Air Force Heritage Flight Foundation 



P-51 



Mustang
News United States Air Force
 Base Defense Airmen secure Tyndall AFBPublished Nov. 5, 2018
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Kelly Walker
                        
                        
                        1st Combat Camera Squadron
                **TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from the 822nd Base Defense Squadron, Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, are always primed to deploy at a moment’s notice to secure and defend bases around the world. On Oct. 11, that moment came.
However, they weren’t traveling to faraway lands to set up security in foreign territory. They were driving to Tyndall AFB, Florida, to protect a base that had been ravaged by a category four hurricane one day prior. 
“Our sole purpose is to be a global response force,” said Staff Sgt. Christopher Beil, 822nd BDS base defender. “We have to be prepared to deploy anywhere in the world, anytime, just like that, and secure an entire base.”
Tyndall is only a three and a half hour drive from Moody, but what the 822nd BDS defenders found when they arrived was outside of the expectations many had when setting out.
“Our group commander told us before we left to keep a sympathetic and empathetic mindset,” Beil said. “I tried to keep that in my head, but nothing could have prepared me for the damage that was done. The first thing that went through my head was that they definitely needed all the help they could get.”
For Airmen accustomed to rapid global response, the call to action so close to home brought a whole new set of experiences.
“For them to have us come down here, this was definitely something new,” Beil said. “We’ve never done anything like this before. Once we took over, we had new procedures for making sure the right people were getting access to the base.”
The many Airmen who have joined the recovery team at Tyndall AFB have undertaken a demanding task and produced real results that lend hope to the future of the base.
“The key here has been adaptability,”Beil said. “That’s always been ingrained in us at the squadron, but coming out here to do this has been a true test of that.”
Among the experiences unique to securing a base within the United States, Beil has found comfort in lending a hand while at home.
“For me, it’s heartwarming,” Beil said. “These are Americans I’m surrounded by. They appreciate the work that we do for them. They appreciate how we’re here trying to represent the Air Force and making sure everyone is safe. We’re the first faces that they see when they come through the gate.”security forces 



Florida 



Tyndall Air Force Base 



Moody AFB 



Moody Air Force Base 



Tyndall AFB 



hurricane 



Hurricane Relief 



822nd Base Defense Squadron 



822nd BDS 



hurricane cleanup 



Hurricane Michael
Exhibit 10.39



CONFIDENTIAL



CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT.
PORTIONS FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED HAVE BEEN MARKED WITH THREE ASTERISKS [***] AND A FOOTNOTE INDICATING "CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT REQUESTED". MATERIAL OMITTED HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.



FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT #1



This Amendment #1 (this “Amendment”)
is entered into by and between New Skies Satellites B.V. (“SES”), and Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. (“Customer”),
and amends the Framework Agreement dated 28 October 2014 between SES and Customer (the “Agreement”). Defined terms
used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.



WHEREAS, the Parties desire to revise the
prepayment requirements under the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:



Effective Date: The effective date of this
Amendment shall be 5 January 2015 (the “Effective Date”)



Section 2 Prepayment and Security: Subsection
(a) (Pre-Payment) of Section 2 (Pre Payment and Security) is modified to include the following sentence at the end of the subsection:



***



In Witness Whereof, the Parties
have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date of last signature below.



|GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC. | NEW SKIES SATELLITES B.V.
|------------------------------- | -------------------------
|                                |                          
|By: /s/ Michael Pigott          | By: U. Bowsma            
|                                |                          
|Name:Michael Pigott             | Name: U. Bowsma          
|                                |                          
|Title:  VP Legal                | Title: Director          
|                                |                          
|Date:2/10/2015                  | Date: 2/11/2015          








*** Confidential treatment requested.











CONFIDENTIAL



[INSERT W9 FORM]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2808 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2808

  To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale 
current group health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum 
    essential health insurance coverage requirement, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2014

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale 
current group health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum 
    essential health insurance coverage requirement, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Employee Health Care Protection Act 
of 2014''.

SEC. 2. IF YOU LIKE YOUR GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN, YOU CAN KEEP IT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (including any amendment made by 
such Act or by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 
2010), a health insurance issuer that has in effect health insurance 
coverage in the group market on any date during 2013 may continue after 
such date to offer such coverage for sale during and after 2014 in such 
market outside of an Exchange established under section 1311 or 1321 of 
such Act (42 U.S.C. 18031, 18041).
    (b) Treatment as Grandfathered Health Plan in Satisfaction of 
Minimum Essential Coverage.--Health insurance coverage described in 
subsection (a) shall be treated as a grandfathered health plan for 
purposes of the amendment made by section 1501(b) of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 FARP: Land, refuel, leavePublished Feb. 19, 2019
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Kristine Legate
                        
                        
                        355th Wing Public Affairs
                **DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz.(AFNS) --**
                In the darkness of night, forward area refueling point team members wait for a HC-130J Combat King II to land – marking the start of training.
FARP, a specialty within the petroleum, oils and lubrication career field, trains Airmen to effectively refuel aircraft in remote locations when air-to-air refueling is not possible or when fueling stations are not accessible.
Davis-Monthan is one of seven bases which can provide FARP capabilities. Of the entire U.S. Air Force, there are a total of 63 qualified FARP team members – nine for each base.
“We come in with everything we need to deliver fuel from one aircraft to another,” said Staff Sgt. Drake Burch, 355th Logistics Readiness Squadron FARP operator. “So that others have enough fuel to complete their missions and make it back home safe.”
FARP plays a role in the U.S. military’s adaptive basing abilities to deliver airpower lethality more effectively and efficiently anywhere in the world by being able to provide a mobile refueling point anywhere an aircraft can land.
“With the ability to set up a refueling site with both minimal equipment and personnel, we are able to provide versatility while leaving a low footprint” Burch said.
To maintain readiness in adverse conditions, FARP training can take place anytime, day or night, and consists of members wearing roughly 60 pounds of gear, to include: a rifle, vest, magazines, night-vision goggles, a helmet and survival gear, while performing refueling tasks to simulate encounters they may face downrange.
“We practice how we play,” said Staff Sgt. Matthew Lara, 355th LRS FARP operator. “It helps us prepare for real-world situations. Downrange we could have scenarios where we have to land, refuel and leave in under an hour.”
Training can be strenuous and demanding. To even qualify for FARP, Airmen must pass Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) school and go through an altitude chamber. In training situations, which can sometimes take place in pitch black darkness, FARP members must show they can refuel aircraft even in the most austere environments. Training in less-than-ideal conditions allow Airmen to hone their skills which will, in turn, allow them to support the mission in any situation.
“It’s demanding – both physically and mentally. On the job, exhaustion can easily creep up on you and thoughts of wanting to quit start to cross your mind, but you don’t quit,” Lara said. “In a real-world situation you can’t just stop, you have to keep going to complete the mission.”HC-130J Combat King II 



forward area refueling point 



FARP 



355th Logistics Readiness Squadron 



355th LRS 



Petroleum 



Oils 



lubrication 



career field 



rifle 



vest 



magazines 



Night Vision Goggles 



helmet 



survival gear
lsb_8k0603ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 




VOTING AGREEMENT




 


Each of the undersigned directors of LSB Financial Corp. (“LSB”) hereby agrees in his or her individual capacity as a shareholder to vote his or her shares of LSB Common Stock that are registered in his or her personal name (and agrees to use his or her reasonable efforts to cause all additional shares of LSB Common Stock owned jointly by him or her with any other person or by his or her spouse or over which he or she has voting influence or control to be voted) in favor of the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Old National Bancorp and LSB, dated June 3, 2014 (the “Agreement”).  In addition, each of the undersigned directors hereby agrees not to make any transfers of shares of LSB with the purpose of avoiding his or her agreements set forth in the preceding sentence and agrees to cause any transferee of such shares to abide by the terms of this Voting Agreement.  Each of the undersigned is entering into this Voting Agreement solely in his or her capacity as an individual shareholder and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Voting Agreement, nothing in this Voting Agreement is intended or shall be construed to require any of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director of LSB, to act or fail to act in accordance with his or her fiduciary duties in such director capacity. Furthermore, none of the undersigned makes any agreement or understanding herein in his or her capacity as a director of LSB.  Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, this Voting Agreement shall be effective from the date hereof and shall terminate and be of no further force and effect upon the earliest of (a) the consummation of the Merger (as defined in the Agreement); (b) the termination of the Agreement in accordance with its terms; or (c) the taking of such action whereby a majority of LSB’s Board of Directors, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 5.06 of the Agreement, withdraws its favorable recommendation of the Agreement to its shareholders.  This Voting Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.


 


Dated this 3rd day of June, 2014.







 



	
s/ James A. Andrew

	  	
/s/ Mariellen M. Neudeck


	
/James A. Andrew

	  	
Mariellen M. Neudeck


	  	  	  
	
/s/ Stephen E. Belter

	  	
/s/ Thomas B. Parent


	
Stephen E. Belter

	  	
Thomas B. Parent


	  	  	  
	
s/ Kenneth P. Burns

	  	
/s/ Jeffrey A. Poxon


	
/Kenneth P. Burns

	  	
Jeffrey A. Poxon


	  	  	  
	
/s/ Sarah R. Byrn

	  	
/s/ Charles W. Shook


	
Sarah R. Byrn

	  	
Charles W. Shook


	  	  	  
	
/s/ Mary Jo David

	  	
/s/ Randolph F. Williams


	
Mary Jo David

	  	
Randolph F. Williams


	  	  	  
	
/s/ Philip W. Kemmer

	  	  
	
Philip W. Kemmer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellant,

v.

LOUIS MANUEL VALLE
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1310

[ April 19, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Roth s child , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 13011CF10A

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Michael Hursey, Esq., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C

. J., D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Smith and another *v.*Norval.

A bond as security for costs, conditioned that the plaintiffs shall pay to the defendants the costs which he might recover in the suit, is a sufficient compliance with the statute which requires a bond conditioned to pay, oil demand, all costs that may be awarded to the defendant in such suit.

July, 1849.

Appeal from an order at chambers, denying a motion made by the defendant to take from the files as irregular, a bond given as security for costs under an order of the court for that purpose. The plaintiffs were non-resident. The condition of the bond filed was, that if the plaintiffs should pay to the defendant the costs which he might recover in the suit, the bond should be void.

*654
      *C. S.*Roe, for the defendant.

*A. Child,*for the plaintiffs.

By the Court. Oakley, Ch. J.

The statute prescribes that security for costs shall be given in the form of a bond in the penalty of at least $250, <fcc., “ conditioned to pay, on demand, all costs that may be awarded to the defendant in such suit.” (2 R. S. 620, § 4.) This bond, it is true, does not pursue the language of the statute, but so far as it differs, it is more favorable to the defendant than the form prescribed. The obligors will be liable immediately, if the defendant’s costs are not paid as soon as he obtains a judgment. The spirit of the statute is fully carried out by this condition, and we think it a sufficient compliance.

Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5739]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME

  Mrs. HUTCHISON. Under the previous order, leadership time is 
reserved.

                          ____________________
```
1 All of the appellants are enumerated in the judgment.



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00341-CV

Robert Loiseau, Special Deputy Receiver for American Benefit Plans, et al., Appellants 1

v. Team Link Corp., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN304388, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal was abated to allow the parties to conduct settlement negotiations. The parties have informed us that they have now settled their dispute and move to dis miss the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed on Joint Motion Filed: November 4, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Executive Officer of Reebok International Ltd. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:



|                         |  | /s/PAUL FIREMANPaul Fireman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  |                                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reebok International Ltd. and will be retained by Reebok
International Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### Edward J. HARTUNG, Jr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 2, 1973.

Edward J. Hartung, Jr., pro se.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Frankfort, M. Curran Clem, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner VANCE,

Reversing.*
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E899]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     TRIBUTE TO RICHARD OLIVER WARD

                                 ______

                          HON. EDOLPHUS TOWNS

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. TOWNS. Mr. Speaker, I want to commend Richard Oliver Ward for his 
vast contributions to the community. Richard was born in Kingston, 
Jamaica, on February 24 to Evaney and Joseph. His family consists of 
five sisters and three brothers. When Richard was 12 years old, the 
family moved to Brooklyn, NY.
  Richard is a product of the New York City public school system. After 
arriving in Brooklyn, he attended P.S. 94 and later graduated from 
Charles E. Hughes High School. After high school, Richard enrolled in 
the Cooking Food of Marathon School.
  But Richard's first love was always music. He started by playing 
drums in the church choir, but soon put them aside and began spinning 
records as a disc jockey. Richard worked at clubs throughout Brooklyn, 
singlehandedly moving his equipment from engagement to engagement. Word 
quickly spread that this young man from Jamaica possessed an unusual 
talent for spinning records. From salsa to calypso to the electric 
slide Richie Rich mixed it all effortlessly.
  Richard has been employed since 1983 with the Police Athletic League 
[PAL]. He enjoys all sports and is an amateur body builder. He 
especially loves working with children.
  Richard resides in the East Flatbush edition of Brooklyn and is the 
proud father of two children; Amanda, who is 12 years old, and Richard, 
Jr., who is 1 year old.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD ORR.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.