alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: September 17, 2007
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS[

We hereby
consent to the use by SandRidge Mississippian Trust I. (the Trust), of our name and to the inclusion of information taken from the reports listed below in the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 26, 2012:

December 31, 2011, SandRidge Mississippian Trust I. Interest in Certain Properties located in the United States
 SEC Price Case



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ C.H. (Scott) Rees IIIC.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

March 22, 2012
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2011-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
|Somsak Chivavibul    

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Senior Securitization Officer)

Navient Funding, LLC
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
QUINTON LEE KNIGHT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3240 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 6, 2019 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher Sabella, Judge. Howard L. Dimming, II, Public Defender, and Deanna K. Marshall, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEROME PERKINS.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer

November 14, 2006
News United States Air Force
 European partnership flight visits Spangdahlem ABPublished June 22, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Preston Cherry
                        
                        
                        52nd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS)-- --**
                Approximately 28 delegates from European air forces toured various facilities at the 52nd Maintenance Group and 52nd Logistics Readiness Squadron during a European partnership flight visit to Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, June 19.
The visit, which happened during an African-European Partnership Flight program at Ramstein AB, was a multilateral, military-to-military engagement and security cooperation event focused on sharing best practices.
“The Europeans are coming here because they are interested in the fighter aircraft and that is why we chose to visit here,” said Noel Fachi, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa theater security cooperation program manager. “We wanted to show them how we develop our Airmen that work on those aircraft and how maintenance and logistics are all centered on that system.”
African partner nations stayed back at Ramstein AB to tour and focus their attention on logistics and maintenance dealing with the mission of transportation and mobility.
European nations that visited included Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria and Croatia and were shown demonstrations and given suggestions to enhance their own capabilities. They were able to interact with personnel and discuss objectives that could be shared across multiple air forces.
“It has been a great tour so far because you manage to see bits and pieces of the overall system and hopefully, by the end of the day, when we see the other pieces, we will be able to build something with these little bricks,” said Croatian air force Lt. Col. Hrvoje Tomsic defense planning officer.
The program is intended to strengthen U.S. strategic partnerships with key countries, share ideas on professional military development and enhance regional cooperation and interoperability.
“It’s an exciting program,” Fachi said. “It benefits both ways. We’re not just trying to tell them how to do things, we are also learning because we work in the same environment. It’s a benefit to the U.S. and it’s a benefit for the partner nations.”Air Force 



USAFE 



AFAFRICA 



Bulgaria 



partnership 



Africa 



cooperation 



AF 



security cooperation 



Croatia 



Spangdahlem AB 



Ramstein AB 



Albania 



Bosnia 



multilateral 



52nd Maintenance Group 



Herzegovina 



European partnership 



AFWN
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILFRED WILLIAMS, JR.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Pilots eject from A-29A Super TucanoPublished March 7, 2017
                        
                        By 23rd Wing Public Affairs
                **MOODY AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS) --**
                Two pilots from the 81st Fighter Squadron ejected safely from an A-29A Super Tucano aircraft during a routine training flight near Homerville, Georgia, at about 2:50 p.m., March 6, 2017.Both pilots were recovered and taken to Clinch Memorial Hospital in Homerville for medical evaluation and have been released.The aircraft crashed in a residential area. There were no reported injuries or damage to nearby structures.The Air Force will perform a thorough investigation into the cause of the mishap, and those findings will be released when the investigation is complete.crash 



ACC 



A-29 



Moody AFB
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0807. BOOKER v. BROWN.

The above-referenced appeal was docketed with this Court on December 22,

2014, and the Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on January 12, 2015. See Court

of Appeals Rule 22 (a). Not having received the Appellant’s brief or a request for an

extension to file same, pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/22/2015

January 22, 2015
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Tech Report: Chem light replacementPublished Feb. 20, 2019
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                Chemical illumination has been a useful tool for military operations for years in the form of chem lights or glow sticks. However, glow sticks could be a hindrance to carry around. The Air Force Research Lab has exponentially lightened the load to allow chemical illumination in the form of a crayon, making light accessible, transferable and useful over and over again.</iframeRelated links:- **Glowing Crayons at AFRL - Wright-Patterson AFB**
 AFTR Tech Report Air Force Glow Stick Chem Light fluid Wand Dependable Source light temporary Chemical Illuminate Illumination Chemiluminescence battlefield Air Force Research Lab AFRL Battle Sight special operations Micro Stick Micro Capsul industry Partner partnership Glowing Crayons
*

 After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.

34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This

order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 3, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

BOB ALLEN CUSTARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARLEY LAPPIN; HARRELL

WATTS; R. WILEY; K. REAR; M.

MONTGOMERY; J. T. SHARTLE;

BENJAMIN BRIESCHKE;

CHRISTOPHER B. SYNSVOLL;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

MARK COLLINS; W. HAYGOOD; R.

MADISON, “Dolly”; B. HAYS; I.

GARCIA; A. FENLON,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-1371

(D.C. No. 07-cv-844-ZLW-BNB)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Based on our independent review of the record in this case, and for

substantially the same reasons set forth by the district court, we affirm that

court’s judgment. With the dismissal of his complaint as malicious under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), Mr. Custard has now earned at least three strikes under

§ 1915(g); accordingly, he may bring no more civil actions or appeals under

§ 1915 unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). We warn Mr. Custard that any future frivolous, malicious, or

abusive filings will put him at the risk of sanctions, including possible filing

restrictions.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch

Circuit Judge
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11817 Summary Calendar

VIRGINIA T. DUNN,
Plaintiff - Appellee

v. BRADLEY B. MILLER,
Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CV- 3213

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In 2013, Virginia Dunn filed a petition for divorce from Bradley Miller. An agreed judgment was entered in 2014, but thereafter, Dunn filed an application in state court seeking to modify child custo d y arrangements. After a 2016 trial regarding same, Miller filed a notice of removal to a federal district court citing, among other statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 1443 in support. The district

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 17, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11817 Document: 00514120021 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2017No. 16- 11817

2 court concluded that it lacked removal jurisdiction and remanded the case to state court. Miller appeals. At the outset, we must limit our decision to the only matter over which we have appellate jurisdiction: whether 28 U.S.C. § 1443 provides removal jurisdiction over this case. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). We lack jurisdiction over any other potential grounds for federal jurisdiction, including any potential jurisdiction over a lawsuit filed under a federal statute; to the extent the appeal relates to any such grounds, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has construed the “equal civil rights” language of 28 U.S.C. § 1443 to be limited to those rights grounded in racial equality. Georgia
v. Rachel , 384 U.S. 780, 792 (1966) ; see also Peltier v. Peltier , 548 F.2d 1083 , 1084 (1st Cir. 1977); Wilkins v. Rogers , 5 81 F.2d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 1978);
Robertson v. Ball , 534 F.2d 63, 66 (5th Cir. 1976); Hunt v. Lamb , 427 F.3d 725, 727 (10th Cir. 2005); Jimenez v. Wizel , 6 44 F. App’x 868, 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 203 (2016)

. Miller makes no such claim. Accordingly, the district court lacked jurisdiction over this removed action under § 1443. AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part. Case: 16-11817 Document: 00514120021 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2017
EXHIBIT 11.1


                          GLASGAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                            FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



                                      January 31, 1998      January 31, 1997
                                      ----------------      ----------------


Earnings (loss) per share

Income (loss) from continuing           $     (245)            $  2,889
operations

Discontinued operations                       (443)             (3,733)
                                         ---------            ---------



Net income                              $     (688)            $  (844)
                                        ----------             --------



Weighted average number of shares           25,693               20,738
  outstanding



Assumed issuances under exercise of              0                    0
                                        ----------              -------
stock options and warrants


Weighted average and common stock
  equivalents                               25,693               20,738
                                        ----------             --------




Income (loss) from continuing                (0.01)               $0.14
operations

Discontinued operations per share            (0.02)              (0.18)



Net income (loss) per share             $    (0.03)            $  (0.04)
EX-10.24



 Exhibit 10.24 

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF 

AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY 

THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (this “Assignment”) is made and
entered into as of the 24th day of September, 2014, by RREEF AMERICA L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”) and RPT TERRA NOVA PLAZA, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”). 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 WHEREAS, VLD Sweetwater, L.P., a California limited partnership and Assignor entered into that certain Agreement for Purchase
and Sale and Escrow Instructions dated as of September 15, 2014 (the “Agreement”) with respect to certain real property located at 390 and 394 East H Street, Chula Vista, San Diego County, California; and 

WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign all of its right, title and interest in and to the Agreement to Assignee, and Assignee desires to
accept such assignment from Assignor. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, Ten
and No/100 U.S. Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by Assignor and Assignee, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows: 

1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to and under the
Agreement, excluding, however, Assignor’s right to the return of the Buyer’s Letter of Credit (as such capitalized term is defined in the Agreement). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, Assignor shall not be relieved
of any of its obligations under the Agreement but shall remain jointly and severally liable with Assignee therefor. 
 2.
Assumption. Assignee hereby assumes all of Assignor’s obligations, duties and liability under the Agreement. 
 3.
Governing Law. This Assignment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. 

4. Binding Effect. This Assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns. 
 5. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have caused this Assignment to be executed under
seal, all the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	ASSIGNOR:
	
	 RREEF AMERICA L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /S/ PETER METTE

	Name:	 	 Peter Mette

	Title:	 	 Director



  

			
	ASSIGNEE:
	
	 RPT TERRA NOVA PLAZA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/ PETER METTE

	Name:	 	 Peter Mette

	Title:	 	 Vice President
News United States Air Force
 I-WEPTAC 2020 registration opensPublished Jan. 15, 2020
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Registration for the fourth annual Installation and Mission Support Weapons and Tactics Conference opened Jan. 14.
Hosted by the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center, the annual conference is the Air Force’s only innovation forum for members of the installation and mission support community. It draws experts from the various Air Force combat support core functions to address I&MS shortfalls and help shape and propose solutions. This year’s conference is scheduled for March 30 through April 8 at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland.
“We’re gathering the brightest minds from across the force to help us develop innovative solutions for today’s warfighter challenges,” said Brig. Gen. Stewart Hammons, director of expeditionary support and innovation at AFIMSC.
I-WEPTAC leverages the expertise of Airmen on cross-functional teams called Mission Area Working Groups. The MAWGs study, develop and recommend courses of action for specific mission topics. The teams will present their findings at the I-WEPTAC out-brief April 8.
The theme for the 2020 I-WEPTAC conference is Targeted Agile Combat Support ... Offsetting Risk. This year’s topics are:
• Installation air base air defense
• Passive defense tactics, techniques and procedures
• Right size the foundation: Optimize base operating support for the Air Force we need
• Leveraging contracting and logistics to enable agile operations
U.S. service members and Defense Department civilians with a secret clearance can attend the I-WEPTAC out-brief on April 8 by registering at https://org2.eis.af.mil/sites/13946/I-WEPTAC/SitePages/Home.aspx#/home.
I-WEPTAC was established a year after more than 150 I&MS capabilities centralized at AFIMSC. Because of the center’s mission execution across the entire Agile Combat Support enterprise, I-WEPTAC was a natural extension of that mission in support of commanders and Airmen in the field. The conference has delivered more than 30 recommendations to the Air Force as a result of the three previous I-WEPTACs, such as the combat support wing concept and development of multi-function Airmen.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFIMSC 



Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center 



I-WEPTAC 



AFMC 



Air Force Materiel Command 



JB San Antonio-Lackland 



I&MS 



MAWGs 



Mission Area Working Groups 



Targeted Agile Combat Support 



ACS Related Links
        I-WEPTAC 2020 Promo
                                
                                Promotional video for 2020 I-WEPTAC.
Exhibit 31.1 

MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION 

I, Marvin S. Edwards, Jr., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of CommScope Holding Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

| Dated: April 26, 2019      |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
| /s/ Marvin S. Edwards, Jr. |
| Name:                      |   | Marvin S. Edwards, Jr. |
| Title:                     |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SHAWN T. BAZEMORE.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.