alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
Cogo Group, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|              | COGO GROUP, INC.
|------------- | ----------------
|              |                 
|April 2, 2012 | By:             
|              |                 
|              |                 
|              |                 
|              |                 
|April 2, 2012 | By:             
|              |                 
|              |                 
|              |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2825

   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to treat as dispensing the 
  delivery of a controlled substance by a pharmacy to a practitioner, 
pursuant to a patient-specific prescription of the practitioner, under 
                         certain circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2014

 Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to treat as dispensing the 
  delivery of a controlled substance by a pharmacy to a practitioner, 
pursuant to a patient-specific prescription of the practitioner, under 
                         certain circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Safe Access to Prescription 
Medication Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. DELIVERY OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES BY A PHARMACY TO A 
              PRACTITIONER PURSUANT TO A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PRESCRIPTION.

    Section 102(10) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
802(10)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(10) The term `dispense' means to 
        deliver'' and inserting the following:
    ``(10)(A) The term `dispense' means--
            ``(i) to deliver'';
            (2) by striking ``The term `dispenser' means a 
        practitioner'' and inserting the following:
    ``(B) The term `dispenser' means a practitioner'';
            (3) in subparagraph (A), as so designated--
                    (A) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; or''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(ii) to deliver a controlled substance by a pharmacy to a 
        practitioner, including the packaging, labeling, or compounding 
        necessary to prepare the substance for such delivery, if--
                    ``(I) such delivery is pursuant to a patient-
                specific prescription of the practitioner; and
                    ``(II) the practitioner has deemed that it is 
                medically necessary, acting in the usual course of 
                professional practice, for the controlled substance to 
                be administered by the practitioner to the patient.''; 
                and
            (4) in subparagraph (B), as so designated, by striking ``to 
        an ultimate user or research subject''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed July 12, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00362

- CV

____________ JOHN EMMANUEL D/B/A FIRST AMERICO AUTO S ALE & REPAIR , Appellant

V. ABIGAIL IZOUKUMOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 98th District Court Trav is County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D

- 1

- GN

- 17

- 006205



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due June 14, 2019

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before July 17, 2019 , the
court wil l dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors of Performance Sports Group Ltd.

 

We consent to the inclusion in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014 of our report dated August 12, 2014, relating to the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2014 and 2013, the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

 

 
| /s/   KPMG LLP         |
|------------------------|
| Boston,   MA           |
| August 27,   2014 |

 

----
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of January 27,2011, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2011-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersignedhereby certifies that:

 

1)        Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)        Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)        Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2014.
#### WHITE *v.*CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (1)

Appeals; Appeal Bonds.

1. Where two defendants appeal from a judgment and the appeal bond is executed by one of them only and his surety, the appeal will not be dismissed.

2. The execution of a judgment appealed from is not superseded by the giving of an appeal bond reciting that the principal and surety shall “answer all damages and costs,”- where the lower court fixed the amount of the appeal bond for costs at $100, and the bond given is in that penalty,' it being apparent that the insertion of the word “damages” in the bond is a clerical error.

No. 2024.

Submitted October 12, 1909.

Decided. October 15, 1910.

Hearing on a motion to dismiss an appeal. *Denied.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. 8. R. Bond*for the motion.

*Messrs. McNeill & McNeill*and *Mr. M. J. Colbert*opposed.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Judgment in this case was rendered against the appellants, *459Jane M. White et al., as executors of Charles White, for the sum of $5,500, on January 29th, 1909. On the same day and in open court the said defendants entered notice of appeal, and the court fixed the amount of the bond for costs at $100. A bond for said amount executed by one of the appellants with surety was approved February 15th, 1909.

, This bond recites that the principal and surety shall “answer all damages and costs.”

The appellee, the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that only one of the appellants has appealed the case, without severance from the others.

The record reciting appeal by all. of the defendants in the judgment, the bond for costs executed by one of them is sufficient. *Brockett*v. *Brockett,*2 How. 238, 240, 11 L. ed. 251, 252; *Scrugqs*v. *Memphis & C. R. Co.*131 U. S. CCIV. Appx. and 26 L. ed. 741.

The contention that this bond shall be regarded as a supersedeas bond, by reason of the recital to answer for damages as well as for costs, is without merit. The bond fixed by the court was to secure the costs of the appeal, for which the sum of $100 was ample.

The insertion of the word “damages” in the bond was a clerical error, produced, doubtless, by the careless use of a printed blank. The execution of the judgment was not superseded by it, and could not havé been.

The motion is overruled, with costs.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20012

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO RIOJAS, JR.; DAVID CANTU; PEDRO MORENO; RAMIRO RIOJAS;

LUIS MORENO; LAZARO MORENO; IRELA YVETTE RIOJAS GONZALEZ;

MELBA RIOJAS MORENO; ROSANNA RIOJAS GUERRERO; JOSE LUIS CANTU;

EDUARDO MORENO; RENE GONZALEZ; CESAR MORENO, SR.; RENATO RIOJAS,

a/k/a Renato Riojas-Sandoval,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-142

- - - - - - - - - -

July 11, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eduardo Moreno, Lazaro Moreno, and Luis Moreno appeal from

the district court’s order revoking the magistrate judge’s order

of release pending trial. The district court’s decision rests on

its conclusion that these appellants present a danger to the
No. 97-20012

- 2 -

community and no conditions will reasonably assure safety, and

that they present a risk of flight and no conditions will 

reasonably assure their appearance as required. We have reviewed

the appellants’ and Government’s briefs and arguments, the

record, and the district court’s order, and find that the

district court’s conclusion that no conditions of release will

assure the appearance of Eduardo Moreno, Lazaro Moreno, or Luis

Moreno is supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben,

974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court’s

detention order as to Eduardo Moreno, Lazaro Moreno, and Luis

Moreno is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 12, 2010
    
    / s / Courtney CowgillCourtney CowgillChief Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          30,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  267,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,100
<INVENTORY>                                    644,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               974,800
<PP&E>                                       1,076,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 742,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,043,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          919,400
<BONDS>                                        600,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     71,700
<COMMON>                                       255,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   (993,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,043,800
<SALES>                                        601,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601,100
<CGS>                                          607,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  607,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,900)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (106,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (107,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,600)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 419th Fighter Wing hosts F-35 virtual field tripPublished April 6, 2020
                        
                        
                        419th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                With closures at schools across the nation due to **COVID-19,** the **419th Fighter Wing** invited students to use their computers or cellphones to “visit” for a virtual field trip to see the Air Force’s newest fighter, the **F-35 Lightning II**.
Col. Brian Silkey, the wing’s vice commander and longtime fighter pilot, recorded a video for the wing’s **Facebook page** and **YouTube channel**.
“We wanted to do a little something for America’s students during this difficult and uncertain time,” Silkey said. “We thought it would be fun to use the technology we have at our fingertips to bring the F-35 to them. Ultimately, we want them to know we’re all in this together and we hope that some are inspired to follow their dreams to serve in the U.S. military.”
During the virtual field trip, Silkey provided an overview of the aircraft’s capabilities to his online audience to include details on its stealth technology and how it gives pilots a significant advantage on the battlefield. He also showed off his G-suit and futuristic helmet.
Members of the 419th FW and their active-duty counterparts in the 388th FW are currently the only combat-capable F-35 units in the Air Force.
Even amid the coronavirus pandemic, the wings are sustaining mission-essential flying operations with limited manning to maintain readiness. Several hundred personnel from the wings are deployed to the Middle East.
In addition to its F-35 mission, the 419th FW also has a full-spectrum mission support group to include civil engineering, security forces, medial, logistics, aerial port, firefighting, supply and transportation. The unit is made up of about 1,300 Reserve Airmen who serve part-time in the military, but are full-time members of the local community.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



innovation 



Hill Air Force Base 



Hill AFB 



F-35 Lightning II 



virtual 



COVID-19 



419th Fighter Wing 



388th Fighter Wing 



fighter jet
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q
    for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
    periods indicated.                                                                                                      

|                                |  |                                
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                               
|/s/ Paul A. Toback              |  | /s/ Carl J. Landeck            
|                                |  |                                
|Name: Paul A. Toback            |  | Name: Carl J. Landeck          
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer |  | Title:  Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 FEDVIP is coming: Get to know dental and vision plans todayPublished Nov. 9, 2018
                        
                        
                        TRICARE Communications
                **FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The TRICARE Retiree Dental Program ends on Dec. 31, 2018. Beginning in 2019, dental and vision plans will be available through the **Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program**. Now is a good time to become familiar with FEDVIP options. FEDVIP 2019 plans and rates will be online in the fall, but you can look at **2018 plans and rates** now.
FEDVIP offers a choice between 10 dental and 4 vision options. This fall will be your first chance to enroll in a FEDVIP dental or vision plan for 2019 coverage. If you’re eligible, you can enroll in FEDVIP during the 2018 Federal Benefits Open Season. It runs from Nov. 12 to Dec. 10.**Who is eligible?**
-Retired service members and their families who were eligible for TRDP are eligible for FEDVIP dental coverage. They’re  also eligible for FEDVIP vision coverage if enrolled in a **TRICARE health plan**.
-Family members of active duty service members who are enrolled in a TRICARE health plan are eligible for FEDVIP vision coverage.
-Children enrolled in or eligible for TRICARE Young Adult aren’t eligible to enroll in FEDVIP.**When do you enroll?**
-You can enroll in FEDVIP during the Federal Benefits Open Season. This year’s open season runs from Nov. 12 through Dec. 10, 2018. Your coverage will begin on Jan. 1, 2019.
-If you currently have TRDP, you must enroll in a FEDVIP plan during the Federal Benefits Open Season to continue dental coverage for 2019.
-The Federal Benefits Open Season is your annual opportunity to enroll in, change, or cancel a FEDVIP dental or vision plan.
For more information, visit the FEDVIP website at **https://tricare.benefeds.com/**. You can see if you’re **eligible for FEDVIP in 2019**. You can also compare FEDVIP plans, look up frequently asked questions, and sign up for updates.FEDVIP 



dental 



vision 



take command 



TRICARE 



TRICARE Dental Plan 



TRICARE Retiree Dental Program 



Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2574 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2574

To make the United States Preventive Services Task Force subject to the 
                    Federal Advisory Committee Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2014

 Mrs. Fischer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make the United States Preventive Services Task Force subject to the 
                    Federal Advisory Committee Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthy Families Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES PREVENTIVE SERVICES TASK FORCE.

    Section 915(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 299b-
4(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
            ``(5) Applicability of faca.--The Federal Advisory 
        Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to the Task Force.''.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects 686 for promotion to captainPublished March 26, 2018
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force selected 686 first lieutenants for promotion to the rank of captain during the calendar year 2017D Captain Line of the Air Force, Chaplain, Line of the Air Force – Judge Advocate, Nurse Corps, Medical Service Corps and Biomedical Sciences Corps quarterly selection process.  
The list is available by clicking the “Captains Quarterly Selection” button on the right side of the Officer Promotions page of the AFPC public website.
Prior to posting the list on myPers, the Air Force’s Personnel Center provided senior raters with advanced knowledge of their officers’ selection to allow notification through the chain of command.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the AFPC public website.Air Force 



officer 



chaplain 



judge advocate 



Nurse Corps 



medical service corps 



Biomedical sciences corp 



Air Force Personnel Center 



first lieutenant 



captain