alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/96
INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,762,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                    95,282
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,198,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,289,474
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     901,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,198,072
<SALES>                                            421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               548,742
<CGS>                                              283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                48,117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             149,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                194,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                    64,206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of 500.com Limited (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2013 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zhengming Pan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 26, 2014



|    |  |                   |  |                        
|--- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Zhengming Pan
|    |  | Name:             |  | Zhengming Pan          
|    |  | Title:            |  | Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.                I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2011-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 

March 28, 2013

 
|   |   |                                                             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Bierman                                            |
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman                                              |
|   | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Senior leaders visit B-21 design, development headquartersPublished March 9, 2020
                        
                        By   Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **MELBOURNE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force senior leaders met with industry partners Feb. 28 at Northrop Grumman’s Melbourne B-21 Raider design and development headquarters.Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett was joined by Dr. Richard Joseph, Air Force chief scientist, and Dr. Will Roper, assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, technology and logistics, in touring on-site facilities to observe B-21 engineering and manufacturing developments.Northrop Grumman scientists offered updates on the progress of both software development and the build of the initial test aircraft, currently underway in Palmdale, California. The evolution of the next-generation stealth bomber is made possible by the Department of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office in partnership with Northrop Grumman.“The Raider workforce demonstrates the highest level of commitment to modernizing the nuclear force,” Barrett said. “The B-21 will be a visible, flexible component of the nuclear triad that assures allies and partners.”These focused efforts align with the fiscal year 2021 President’s Budget Request direction for the Department of Defense to ensure modernization of nuclear forces is its number one priority.“The B-21 is one of our top modernization programs to maintain both a nuclear and conventional warfighting advantage. In addition to pushing boundaries in hardware technologies, like stealth, the B-21 is blazing new trails in agile software development,” Roper said.The industry visit comes on the heels of Barrett’s attendance at the Air Force Association Air Warfare Symposium in Orlando, Florida, in February, and only six months after former Acting Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan announced the B-21 production location at AFA’s 2019 Air, Space and Cyber Conference.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



B-21 



Raider 



design 



development 



chief scientist 



Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition 



technology and logistics 



engineering 



manufacturing 



Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office 



partnership 



budget 



request 



Air Force Association 



Air Warfare Symposium 



air 



Space and Cyber conference 



nuclear 



modernization
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 

Summary of Executive Officer Compensation 

The following executive officers of ABIOMED, Inc. are at will employees of ABIOMED, Inc. and have not entered into a formal employment
agreement with ABIOMED, Inc. The current understanding between each employee and ABIOMED, Inc. with respect to the employee’s compensation is as follows: 
  

									
	 Name
	  	Base Salary	 	  	Target
Fiscal 2015
Bonus
(Percentage
of Salary)	 
	 William J. Bolt
	  	$	294,565	  	  	 	60	% 
			
	 Andrew J. Greenfield
	  	$	271,737	  	  	 	55	% 
			
	 Michael G. Howley
	  	$	306,696	  	  	 	65	% 

 These officers are also eligible to receive grants of stock options and other awards at the discretion of
ABIOMED’s Compensation Committee. 
 We have an employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Michael R. Minogue, which sets
forth the terms of his employment. Mr. Minogue’s current salary is $537,876 and his target bonus for fiscal 2015 is 120% of salary. We have an offer letter with our Chief Financial Officer, Robert L. Bowen, which sets forth the terms of
his employment. Mr. Bowen’s current salary is $323,322 and his target bonus for fiscal 2015 is 60% of salary. We also have an offer letter with our Chief Operating Officer, David M. Weber, which sets forth the terms of his employment.
Mr. Weber’s current salary is $350,381 and his target bonus for fiscal 2015 is 70% of salary.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PHILLIP POLITE.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 AFSPC assumes COMSATCOM procurement responsibility for DoDPublished Dec. 12, 2018
                        
                        
                        Air Force Space Command Public Affairs
                **PETERSON AFB, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Space Command commander assumed responsibility for procurement of commercial satellite communications services for the Department of Defense from the Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency December 12. The move is in accordance with Section 1601(a) of the Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act. 
This transfer means AFSPC will oversee procurement of nearly all military and commercial SATCOM for the DoD, and will allow it to manage SATCOM as an enterprise, integrating delivery of all SATCOM services in the future and increasing efficiency and effectiveness for the joint force. 
“The SATCOM mission is critical to the success of our joint warfighters on the battlefield and requirements for this capability continue to increase,” said Gen. Jay Raymond, AFSPC and Joint Force Space Component commander. “The new acquisition authority better integrates our military and private SATCOM sectors, ensuring our warfighters have the communications capabilities they need to fight and win.” 
AFSPC and DISA have been working closely together over the last year to ensure a smooth transfer of responsibilities, while maintaining timely and effective provision of COMSATCOM services for the joint force during and after transition. 
“Our vision is for users to be able to connect quickly among different satellite constellations or service providers,” Raymond said. 
Initially, the 36 civilian and military members and 70 support contractors executing the COMSATCOM procurement mission will be under operational control of AFSPC, while DISA retains administrative control of those personnel. Formal transfer of the personnel to AFSPC will occur by October 2019. 
The phased approach from initial to full operational capability maintains the expertise of the personnel in DISA’s SATCOM organizations today and limits impact to personnel and operations during the transition. 
AFSPC is scheduled to achieve full operational capability by October 2020.SecAF 



Air Force 



satellite 



communications 



joint 



AF 



DISA 



AFSPC 



SATCOM 



Peterson 



SAF 



NDAA 



FY18 



procurement 



space
News United States Air Force
 Little Rock AFB hosts Arkansas’ largest STEM FestPublished Nov. 1, 2018
                        
                        
                        19th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, Ark. (AFNS)  --**
                Little Rock Air Force Base hosted Arkansas’ largest Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics festival in conjunction with the Thunder Over the Rock Air and Space Show, with a field trip day Oct. 26 that drew more than 20,000 attendees, over 13,000 of whom were students.
The students, teachers and chaperones in attendance experienced exhibits focused on science, technology, engineering and mathematics with the goal of building interest in STEM-oriented careers.
“We all felt a lot of responsibility to live up to the expectations of 13,000 students and their teachers, but seeing the amazed looks on their faces drove home how important this experience was for our young people,” said Maj. Kyle Sanders, STEM Fest director. “It was our chance to bring their textbooks to life and connect with science professionals from the entire region.”
The exhibits included a robotics competition, drone races, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration high-altitude weather balloon launch, and NASA’s Journey to Tomorrow, a traveling exhibit that immerses visitors in a fun-filled interactive experience.
The festival offered a chance for Arkansas institutions and professionals to interact with a variety of students from across the state.
“This amount of student engagement you cannot put a price on; it’s unprecedented in Arkansas,” said Chris Lynch, Arkansas Department of Career Education STEM coordinator.
STEM careers are projected to be the fastest growing sector in the next few decades. In partnering with the state of Arkansas, Little Rock AFB hoped to expose attendees to STEM careers by connecting them with professionals in a variety of fields.
“Both our nation and our local economy depend on technology to thrive,” Sanders said. “We hope that this event helped inspire the next generation of scientists and engineers.”
The STEM Fest also ran throughout the Thunder Over the Rock Air and Space Show Oct. 27-28, and was open to the public. The festival exhibits complemented the air and space show by highlighting the vital role STEM plays in aviation technology and the Air Force.
"STEM is important because it's what makes the world go ‘round,” said Capt. Ian Bergstrom, STEM Fest augmentee. “It's important to get that into a child's perspective at a young age."education 



engineering 



mathematics 



science 



stem 



STEM Fest 



technology 



Thunder Over the Rock Air and Space Show 



AF 



Air Force 



Little Rock AFB 



AMC 



Air Mobility Command 



Air Force Base
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5851-S5852]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                GAMBLING

 Mr. SIMON. Mr. President, the Washington Monthly recently, in 
an editorial, had a column by Roman Genn and a comment about gambling 
in the United States and its spread.
  This has been a growing phenomenon in our country, and we have not 
examined what its impact will be on the future of our country.
  The article points out some of the problems.
  I introduced a bill in the last session of Congress, and I have 
introduced a bill also in this session to set up a commission to look 
at this matter.
  Obviously, we are not going to eliminate legal gambling in our 
society. But 
[[Page S5852]] I believe we should know what we are doing in terms of 
its total impact.
  I ask that the Washington Monthly item be printed in the Record.
  The article follows:

       Guess what the fastest growing business in America is? 
     Gambling. About $330 billion was legally bet last year, 
     reports NBC's Roger O'Neil, which is more than the defense 
     budget and about what Social Security costs. Thirty-seven 
     states and the District of Columbia have legalized lotteries; 
     20 states have casinos that are owned by Native Americans; 
     and 10 states have licensed either casinos or riverboats. In 
     Iowa, every man, women, and child is within a two-hour drive 
     of a casino. Here in the District of Columbia, the lottery is 
     pushed by hard-sell television commercials designed to 
     encourage gambling. This is crazy. It's also evil. Why not 
     have state-sponsored opium dens with TV commercials promoting 
     blissful oblivion? There is a reasonable argument for the 
     state to offer gambling and dope to those who are determined 
     to partake of those dubious pleasures, but it is outrageous 
     to advertise them in a way that could tempt those who might 
     otherwise choose to say no. . . .
     

                          ____________________
```
NUMBER 13-23-00243-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

LOUELLA SADLER,

PARTNERS CAPITAL, L.L.C.,

JR ASSETS, L.L.C., RIEHS

BROTHERS L.P., R BROS L.P.,

AND RIEHS CATTLE CO., Appellants,

v.

JONATHAN R. RIEHS,

BRENT R. ROZNER,

AND ROBERT BLEVINS, Appellees.

 

On appeal from the 24th District Court 

of Jackson County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Contreras
2

This cause is before the Court on appellants’ motion to withdraw appeal which we 

construe as a motion to dismiss appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). According to the 

motion, after the trial court granted a Third Amended Temporary Injunction, this appeal is 

now moot.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the motion to dismiss the 

appeal, is of the opinion the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed as moot. Costs 

are taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the 

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at 

the appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

13th day of July, 2023.
EXHIBIT 32.b

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Westwood  One,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Jacques  Tortoroli,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/S/ Jacques Tortoroli
---------------------
Jacques Tortoroli
November 14, 2003

This statement is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission as
an exhibit to this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:






We have examined the accompanying management’s assertion, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Nissan Auto Receivables 2008-B Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction and the Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-A Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2013.  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based on our examination.






Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.






In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2013, is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ KPMG LLP




Chicago, Illinois


May 24, 2013
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

 

We hereby consent to the use by SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) of our name and to the inclusion of information taken from the reports listed below in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 14, 2014, as well as to the incorporation by reference thereof into the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-184561):

 

December 31, 2012, SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Interest in Certain Properties located in Oklahoma — SEC Price Case

 

December 31, 2011, SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Interest in Certain Properties located in Oklahoma — SEC Price Case

 

 
|   | **NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                              |
|   | By:                                                               | /s/   C.H. (Scott) Rees III |
|   |                                                              | C.H.   (Scott) Rees III, P.E. |
|   |                                                              | Chairman   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Dallas, Texas

March 14, 2014

 

----