alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.46


 






 




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







TO THE DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF INTEGRAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(A Development Stage Company)







We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Integral Technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.







We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.







In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at June 30, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.







The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has no revenues and limited capital, which together raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in note 3. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


 





Chartered Accountants







Vancouver, Canada


September 27, 2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE DANIELLE RENEE FORGET SHIELD

______________________ 

2013-1562

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 

10/799,826.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 Danielle Renee Forget Shield moves without opposition to reinstate this appeal, to recall the mandate, and 

for an extension of time, until November 1, 2013, to file 

her formal opening brief.

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motion to reinstate the appeal and to recall the mandate is granted. The court’s September 27, 

2013 order is vacated, the court’s mandate is recalled and 

the appeal is reinstated. 

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted. 

The appellant’s opening brief is due on or before November 1, 2013. 

Case: 13-1562 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 10/28/2013
2 IN RE SHIELD

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk 

s21

Case: 13-1562 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 10/28/2013
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned President of Ironton Iron, Inc. (the "Company") and Vice President
of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of INTERMET Corporation, which is the
owner of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company, hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert E. Belts
-------------------
Robert E. Belts
November 13, 2002






                                       17
# FILED

March 12, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE JANUARY 1999 SESSION

BRANDON A. MILLER, ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9803-C R-00102 ) Defendant/Appellant ) ) McMINN CO UNTY v. ) ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) HON. R. STEVEN BEBB, JUDG E ) Appellee ) (Post- convic tion re lief)

FOR THE APPELLANT : FOR THE APPELLEE : Brandon A. Miller John Knox Walkup P.O. Box 1000 Attorney General & Repor ter Petros, TN 37845 Michael J. Fahey, II Assistant Attorney Gener al 425 Fifth Avenue North Second Floor, Cordell H ull Building Nashville, TN 37243

OPINION FILED

AFFIRMED JOHN K. BYERS SENIOR JUDGE-2- O P I N I O N The trial court dismissed the defendant’s petition for post-conv iction relief because it was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The defendant pled guilty to sev eral offenses in July and Nov ember of 1993. On June 2 0, 1996, the defen dant fil ed a peti tion for post-c onvict ion rel ief. At the time of the defendant’s convic tions, the applicable statute of limitations was three years. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-102 (Repealed 1995). In 1995, the applicable statute of limitati ons was reduced to one y ear. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30- 202(a). At the time of the adoption of Tenn. Code Ann. § 40- 30-202(a), the defendant’s right to file a peti tion for post-conviction relief had not expired. Therefore, his right to file a petition was not terminat ed by the reduction of the limitation period from three y ears to one year. Under the holding in the case of Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2d 417 (Tenn. 1997), the defendant had one year from the date of the adoption of the statute fixing the limitation at one year to file a petition. That would allow him to file a timely petition on or before May 10, 1996. The defendant filed his petition on June 20, 1996. This was beyond the on e year period and the defendant did no t show there was any

exception for not applying the one year

limitation in this case. The trial judge properly dismissed the petition. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It ap pearing that the defendant is indigent, costs of the appeal ar e taxed to the State.

John K. Byers, Sen ior Judge-3-

CONCUR:

James Curwood W itt, Jr., Judge

Norma McGee Ogle, Judge
#### BARBARA LUKAS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5683]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The guest Chaplain, the Reverend Dr. T. Warren Moorhead, offered the 
following prayer:
  May we pray:
  Holy God, You are almighty, You alone are holy. As Lord of the 
universe, Sovereign Ruler of nations and men, and Holy Redeemer of the 
unborn, the living, and the dead, we join this Senate today confessing 
our unworthiness in Your presence. You are total love. Through the 
example of Your son, You taught us to love one another and to reach out 
to our neighbor, as well as our enemy. But too often we have been 
consumed by our own selfish concerns. Why must it take, O God, a 
tragedy as occurred last week to shock our Nation into realizing the 
potential evil inherent in every man's heart and our ultimate 
hopelessness without the manifestation of Your love in each of us 
through Your son, Jesus Christ.
  You are God and we are but persons of clay. We begin this 
congressional day by acknowledging Your power and requesting Your 
guidance in all deliberations. Holy Father, give the Members of this 
body not only the wisdom to know right but also the courage to do what 
is right. The Members of this Chamber are accountable to the people of 
these United States but ultimately to You. Psalms 72 reminds us that 
You, God, give rulers Your justice that they may judge Your people with 
righteousness, Your poor with compassion, that they may defend the 
cause of the destitute, give deliverance to the needy, and crush the 
oppressor. Lord, may You give to the esteemed men and women of this 
sacred Chamber the willingness to cooperate with You in promoting 
justice and righteousness, establishing peace and tranquility across 
our troubled land. May we strive for the day when peace covers the 
Earth as water covers the sea.
  Holy God, today, great pressures will be brought to bear on the men 
and women of this room. Remind them now that You allowed the people to 
elect them because of their inner strengths that will protect them from 
outside pressures. May the words of their mouths, the meditations of 
their hearts, and the actions of their hands be acceptable in Your 
sight this day. In Jesus' name I ask this. Amen.
  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The distinguished Senator from Georgia is 
recognized.
  Mr. COVERDELL. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Santorum). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 27, 2016

No. 04-15-00436-CV

Bryan SMITH d/b/a Vision Design and Build,

Appellant

v.

Robert OVERBY and Teresa Overby,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-02799

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s reply brief was due on April 5, 2016; we granted Appellant’s first motion for 

extension of time to file the reply brief until April 25, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c), (d). On 

April 22, 2016, Appellant filed an unopposed second motion for extension of time to file the 

reply brief until May 9, 2016. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief must be filed not later than 

May 9, 2016. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE REPLY BRIEF 

WILL BE GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on April 27, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS and Board of Claims of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Doris GIBSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Henry Gibson, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 7, 1973.

Carl T. Miller, Jr., Director, Don Duff, General Counsel, Department of Highways, Frankfort, Jerry Roger Grigsby, Elizabeth-town, for appellants.

Larry D. Raikes, Hodgenville, for appel-lee.

Memorandum Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Affirming.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**OCEANUS ACQUISITION CORP.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofOceanus Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, German Rivero-Zerpa, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to German Rivero-Zerpa and willbe retained by Oceanus Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

Dated: May 27, 2014

 

By: /s/ German Rivero-Zerpa

German Rivero-Zerpa

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: (10-104)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Education and Public Outreach Committee of the NASA Advisory Council. 

# DATES:

Monday, September 20, 2010, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Local Time.

# ADDRESSES:

NASA Johnson Space Center, Gilruth Center—Longhorn Room, Houston, TX 77058.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

This meeting will also take place telephonically and via WebEx. Any interested person should contact Ms. Erika G. Vick, Executive Secretary for the Education and Public Outreach Committee, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, at *Erika.vick-1@nasa.gov*, no later than 4 p.m. EDT September 17, 2010, to get further information about participating via teleconference and/or WebEx.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:
    - Regulations that Constrain Public Engagement.
    - NASA and Social Media.
    - Education Design Team.
    - Action Item Status.
    - Johnson Space Center Presentations.

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Dated: August 31, 2010.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-22200 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                     |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 16, 2003 |  | PETER H. VAN OPPEN                                      
|                     |  |                                                         
|                     |  | Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer

23
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

     Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Chevis C. Swetman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples
Financial Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying
report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully
complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material aspects, the financial operations and results of operations of
the Company.


                 By:   /s/ Chevis C. Swetman
                       ---------------------------------------------------------
                       Chevis C. Swetman,
                       Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

                       August 8, 2002
                       ---------------------------------------------------------
                       Date


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Lauri A. Wood, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Peoples Financial
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form
10- Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully complies
with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material aspects, the financial operations and results of operations of
the Company.

                          By /s/ Lauri A. Wood
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                             Lauri A. Wood
                             Chief Financial Officer and Controller

                             August 7, 2002
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                             Date
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Title:

Jason Kulas Chief Financial
OfficerDate:

March 30, 2012
News United States Air Force
 First operational F-35A squadron receives final aircraftPublished June 29, 2017
                        
                        By Donovan K. Potter
                        
                        
                        388th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                The 34th Fighter Squadron and 34th Aircraft Maintenance Unit at Hill Air Force Base accepted its final two combat-coded F-35A Lightning lls June 21, 2017.
The addition of the 24th and final aircraft means the units have their full component of operational jets.
“Gaining the 24th F-35A here is another outstanding milestone for the 388th and 419th wings,” said Col. Jason Rueschhoff, the 388th Operations Group commander. “This allows both operations and maintenance to fine-tune our tactics, techniques and procedures with a focus on maximizing our combat lethality.”
This is a pivotal point for combat-capability development said Col. Michael Miles, the 388th Maintenance Group commander.
"Having the full number of aircraft in one FS/AMU means we'll soon receive our full personnel and equipment,” Miles said. “This allows us to meet all potential combat taskings."
The 388th Fighter Wing received its first F-35A in November 2015. Since that time, the unit has developed the best tactics, techniques and procedures, shaping how the F-35A operates in the Air Force, said Capt. Christina Merritt, the 34th AMU officer in charge.
Merritt said receiving the 24th aircraft pushes the threshold and helps Airmen further test the limits of the F-35A.
The 4th FS and 4th AMU are expected to receive the next F-35A this summer. A total of 78 jets will be delivered to two additional F-35A squadrons in the 388th FW through 2019.F-35 



Air Force 



 



Air Combat Command 



Lightning II 



AF 



388th Fighter Wing 



combat 



ACC 



capabilities 



Air Force Base 



388th FW 



34th Fighter Squadron 



34th FS 



34th Aircraft Maintenance Unit 



34th AMU 



Hill AFB