alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7855

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS JERECKI, a/k/a Tommy Jerecki, a/k/a

Thomas Robert Jerecki,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-98-111, CA-00-1092-6)

Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 26, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Jerecki, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Jerecki seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). Jerecki’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Jerecki that failure to

file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite this warning, Jerecki failed to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. The district court adopted the magistrate

judge’s findings and recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jerecki has waived appellate review by

failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Jerecki’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We also deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Stephen R. Head, certify that:

 

|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc.; |
|--|----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|--|----|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | 3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Stephen R. Head

Stephen R. Head

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration,

Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

March 4, 2015

 

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Air Force accepts KC-46APublished Jan. 10, 2019
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force accepted the first KC-46A Pegasus tanker from The Boeing Company Jan. 10. 
This is a major milestone for the next generation tanker and will allow Airmen to begin operational testing and flight training.
The Air Force has identified, and Boeing has agreed to fix at its expense, deficiencies discovered in developmental testing of the remote vision system. The Air Force has mechanisms in place to ensure Boeing meets its contractual obligations while initial operational testing and evaluation continues.
The formal delivery ceremony at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, will occur as early as late January.SecAF 



CSAF 



KC-46A 



Pegasus 



tanker 



Boeing 



operational testing 



flight training 



developmental testing 



repair 



remote vision system 



AF 



Air Force 



McConnell AFB 



AMC
**EXHIBIT      31.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     |   | I                have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CEVA, Inc. (the                “Company”); and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     |   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |

|                                |                                 |                               |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                           |                            |                          |
| Date:                April 28, 2006 | By:                        | /s/ Yaniv              Arieli |
|                                | Yaniv                Arieli          |
|                                | Chief              Financial Officer |

----
News United States Air Force
 Commander provides update brief to Air Force leadershipPublished Oct. 28, 2018
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Rachelle Blake
                        
                        
                        325th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright visited Tyndall Air Force Base Oct. 27, for the second time since Hurricane Michael caused catastrophic damage.
Since Vice President Mike Pence announced plans to rebuild Tyndall AFB earlier this week, the base has been actively strategizing a way forward.
After taking time to recognize Airmen from around the base for their efforts to support the post-storm recovery, Goldfein and Wright received an update brief from Col. Brain Laidlaw, 325th Fighter Wing commander.
Laidlaw led with information on Task Force Harp, which is focused on the base's most important asset, its people.
"We are now leaning forward and squadron commanders are looking down their rosters, person by person, trying to figure out what works best for each situation," he said.
The status of Task Force Phoenix came next, which is responsible for infrastructure.
Laidlaw said their job is to save what they can and, from there, build the base that is needed.
To support that mission, 1,200 people have been brought in so far.
"Every single one of these people were sent here for a reason and they have been doing amazing work," said Laidlaw. "We are taking people in as fast as we can feed them and as fast as we can find a place for them to live and every single one of them is doing exactly what we asked them to do."
In addition, he announced the base now has power and they are carefully and systematically turning on various circuits. The sewer is fully operational to include the waste water and treatment plant.
Of the 704 buildings, not including housing, more than 300 have been inspected and at least 37 percent are fixable.
"If you would have asked me two weeks ago how many of our buildings we thought would be operational, I would not have told you 37 percent," Laidlaw said. "That is a good news story."
His said he is in awe of what his team has been accomplishing.
"This has been a proud two weeks to be in the Air Force," said Laidlaw. "As traumatic as this has been for our community, the 1,200 people we have on this base are getting the opportunity to do exactly what we have trained them to do. We have the right people, right here."
Goldfein said he was impressed with the actions taken before the storm to ensure the safety of the Airmen and families there.
"You all saved lives," he said. "In 48 hours you evacuated 11,000 people off the base and 100 miles away and not a single injury. That is a record. I don't think that has happened in the history of this kind of storm."Air Force Chief of Staff 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force 



Vice President of the United States 



325th Fighter Wing 



Task Force Harp 



Task Force Phoenix
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES J. CASHIN.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Point Capital,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Eric Weisblum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: March 31, 2017



|By:    | /s/ Eric Weisblum                                                           | 
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Eric Weisblum                                                               | 
|Title: | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer) | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Exercise Tonnerre Lightning exhibits trust, teamwork, trainingPublished Nov. 10, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Micaiah Anthony
                        
                        
                        100th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **RAF MILDENHALL, England (AFNS) --**
                Around-the-clock, whether for combat operations or humanitarian aid, Airmen are ready to respond anywhere. Until they get that call, however, Airmen hone their skills through exercises and realistic training.
During exercise Tonnerre Lightning, the U.S. Air Force worked with United Kingdom and French forces to prepare and conduct realistic training Oct. 31-Nov. 9, at Royal Air Force Waddington, England.
“It was a compilation of U.K., French and U.S. fighters and tankers from both sides,” said Maj. Ashley Haney, the 100th Operations Group chief of exercises. “We went through the overall plan to figure out how the other countries work, what minute differences exist and how we can operate effectively together both on the tanker side and on the fighter side. The planning portion was excellent. They thought through a lot of different contingencies, understood the plan exactly, and executed the plan very well.”
Once the planning portion was complete, several airframes such as RAF Typhoons, French Mirages, U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons and KC-135 Stratotankers participated in the exercise.
“Leading a crew of three Airmen, we flew a mission down to the Mediterranean where the second portion of the exercise was held,” said Capt. Robert Allen, a 351st Air Refueling Squadron KC-135 aircraft commander. “We refueled U.S. fighter aircraft that were training and practicing in the area.”
During real-world operations, trust plays a vital role, from showing up at the right place at the right time to performing the mission effectively and efficiently. 
“Any time you get on a plane you’re trusting the crew and the receivers,” Haney said. “The receivers are trusting that we know what we’re doing and how to do it. Exercises like this help build our reliability to support our allies. That trust increases every time we operate together.”
With an exercise of this magnitude, the importance of having trust in each other assists with enabling effective communication and helps foster teamwork.
“Enhancing communication with our NATO allies makes us more efficient as one fighting unit,” Allen said. “Each country does things a little bit differently, but with exercises like this we can get on the same page and come together as one unit and one fighting force which makes us more efficient. Through training, we get to see where we are, how we work together and we can increase interoperability.”USAFE 



exercise 



joint 



England 



France 



RAF Mildenhall
Opinion issued April 1 4 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 20 - 00 166 - C R NO. 01 - 20 - 00167 - CR

——————————— IN RE DANIEL LEE HARRISON , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Daniel Lee Harrison , incarcerated and proceeding pro se , has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the Harris County District Clerk to transmit his application for writ of habeas corpus and other d ocuments to the Court2

of Criminal Appeals. 1 Rel a tor asserts that the district clerk has not complied with the clerk’s duties under article s 2.21 and 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
. 2 T his Court ’s mandamus jurisdiction is limited to writs of mandamus against certain judges within its district and all writs necessary to enforce the Court’s jurisdiction. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221 . Thus, we have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See id. ; In re Wilkerson , No. 05

- 16

- 00322

- CV, 2016 WL 1320815 , at *1 (Tex. App.

—

Dallas Apr. 5, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Washi ngton , 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding)
. Because relator’s petition does not reflect that issuance of a writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk. See In re Washington , 7 S.W.3d at 182. Accordingly, w e d ismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction
. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kell y and Goodman
. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2( b).

1 The underlying case is State of Texas v. Daniel Lee Harrison , cause number s 1369904 & 1370009 , pending in the 1 78 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Kelli Johnson , presiding.
2 See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . art. 2.21(a)(1), (6).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Repository for Mouse Models for Cytogenetic Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         February 16, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To provide concept review of proposed concept review.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 27, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2197 Filed 2-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT LEON KELLEY, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 438 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
[Cite as State ex rel. Davis v. Walker , 2011-Ohio-5282.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97341



## STATE OF OHIO EX REL. KENNETH DAVIS, JR.

RELATOR
vs. 

## HONORABLE SANDRA WALKER, JUDGE

RESPONDENT



### JUDGMENT:

DISMISSED

Writ of Procedendo

Order No. 448219

RELEASE DATE: October 12, 2011

-i- 2



FOR RELATOR:
Kenneth Davis, Jr., Pro Se Inmate #A-564-782 Lake Erie Correctional Institution P.O. Box 8000 Conneaut, Ohio 44030

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Ronald K. Riley Director of Law City of East Cleveland 14340 Euclid Avenue East Cleveland, Ohio 44112

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J.:
{¶ 1} Relator, Kenneth Davis, Jr., avers that he is the defendant in E. Cleveland v.

Davis , E. Cleveland Municipal Court Case No. 08TRD04307. Davis requests that this
court compel respondent to rule on his motion to withdraw plea.
{¶ 2} In Hazel v. Knab , ___ Ohio St.3d ___ , 2011-Ohio-4608, ___ N.E.2d ___
, petitioner Hazel was incarcerated and filed an action in habeas corpus. “* * *
[A]lthough he filed an affidavit of indigency and sought waiver of prepayment of the
court’s filing fees, he failed to include in his affidavit of indigency a statement setting 3

 forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified
by the institutional cashier, in violation of R.C. 2969.25(C). “The requirements of R.C.
2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to

dismissal.’ State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d
634, ¶5. Hazel’s subsequent filing of the statement did not cure the defect. See R.C.
2969.25(C); see also Fuqua v. Williams , 100 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-Ohio-5533, 797
N.E.2d 982, ¶9.” Id. ¶1. The supreme court affirmed the judgment of the court of
appeals dismissing Hazel’s petition in habeas corpus.
{¶ 3} Davis is currently incarcerated. He states that the “Certificate of the
Institutional Cashier” is attached to his affidavit seeking waiver of prepayment of the
court’s filing fees and affidavit of indigency pursuant to R.C. 2969.25(C). A thorough
review of the original affidavit and the copies filed with the court, however, reflects that
Davis has not filed the R.C. 2969.25(C) cashier’s statement. As noted in Hazel , this
defect requires dismissal of this action and cannot be cured by supplementing the
complaint with the cashier’s statement later.
{¶ 4} Accordingly, we dismiss this action sua sponte. Relator to pay costs. The
clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry
upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Complaint dismissed. 4



_______________________________ KENNETH A. ROCCO, JUDGE
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, P.J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR