alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21566]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Final Environmental Impact Statement; Prisoners Harbor Wetland 
Restoration, Santa Cruz Island, Channel Islands National Park, Santa 
Barbara County, CA; Notice of Approval of Record of Decision

    Summary: Pursuant to Sec.  102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended) and the regulations 
promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR 1505.2), 
the Department of the Interior, National Park Service (NPS) has 
prepared and approved a Record of Decision for the Final Environmental 
Impact Statement for restoration of approximately 3 acres of coastal 
wetland on Santa Cruz Island, Channel Islands National Park. The 
requisite no-action ``wait period'' was initiated April 16, 2010, with 
the Environmental Protection Agency's Federal Register notification of 
the filing of the Final EIS.
    Decision: As soon as practical the NPS will begin to implement 
restoration of palustrine wetlands and deepwater habitat at Prisoners 
Harbor, as well as remove a berm constricting natural flows in lower 
Canada del Puerto Creek, in order to reconnect the creek to its 
floodplain. Other project elements include removing cattle corrals and 
relocating a scale house to its pre-1960s location, removing eucalyptus 
and controlling other non-native species, and protecting archeological 
resources. This alternative was identified and analyzed as the agency-
preferred Alternative B in the Final EIS (and includes no substantive 
modifications to the course of action which was described in the Draft 
EIS). The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences were 
assessed, and appropriate mitigation measures (developed in 
consultation with Tribal representatives and other agencies) are 
included in the approved plan. Both a No Action alternative and one 
additional ``action'' alternative (Alternative C, which would have 
restored approximately a third less wetland habitat) were also 
identified and analyzed. As documented in the Draft and Final EIS, the 
selected alternative was deemed to be the ``environmentally preferred'' 
course of action.
    Copies: Interested parties desiring to review the Record of 
Decision may obtain a copy by contacting the Superintendent, Channel 
Islands National Park, 1901 Spinnaker Drive, Ventura, CA 93001 or via 
telephone request at (805) 658-5700.

     Dated: July 13, 2010.
Patricia L. Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-21566 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-F6-P
```
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Claude Resources (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mike Sylvestre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify
that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                                                                and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:  April 30, 2014

| | By: | / s / Mike Sylvestre                 
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

October 31, 2006

Before

Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge

Hon. Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge

Hon. Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge

No. 05-4744

WATERLOO FURNITURE COMPONENTS,

LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HAWORTH, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District

of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 05 C 0507

Elaine E. Bucklo, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The slip opinion of this court issued on October 30, 2006, is amended as follows:

Page 1, caption, for Waterloo Furniture Components, Ltd., change “PlaintiffAppellee” to “Plaintiff-Appellant”.

Page 1, caption, for Haworth, Inc., change “Defendant-Appellant” to “DefendantAppellee”.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kopin Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Sneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:

March 17, 2008By:

/S/ RICHARD A. SNEIDERRichard A. Sneider Chief Financial
Officer
News United States Air Force
 Airmen invited to comment on safety publicationPublished June 12, 2017
                        
                        By John Wooden
                        
                        
                        Air Force Safety Center
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                To gain insight and perspective from all Air Force stakeholders, the Air Force Safety Center requests informal comments on the draft revision of Air Force Instruction 91-203, *Air Force Consolidated Occupational Safety Instruction*.  
The AFI is the Air Force’s Occupational Safety and Health instruction and defines the Air Force’s minimum safety, fire prevention and occupational health standards.  The current version, published in 2012, is among the top five publications viewed every week on the Air Force e-Publishing website.  
The solicitation of comments from active-duty Airmen and civilian employees is similar to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration practice of public announcement on safety standards.
“Openness is very important to the Air Force Chief of Safety,” said Bill Parsons, the chief of Air Force Occupational Safety. “We’re conducting this review and comment period in order to ensure that openness.  The objective is to reduce the current instruction and allow greater access and utilization of OSHA’s federal standards.”
Phase I of the process, Chapters 1 – 11, is available on the AFI 91-203 comments site for review and comment.  The comment period will remain open until Aug. 1, 2017.  Phase II, Chapters 12 – 22, and Phase III, Chapters 23 – 31 will follow.  All comments will be considered during the revision process. Comments deemed to have merit will be added to the publication for official adjudication by the Air Force Occupational Safety and major command chiefs of safety.Air Force 



 



safety 



AF 



AFSC 



review 



Kirtland AFB 



MAJCOM 



OSHA 



Fire Prevention 



Air Force Base 



Major Command 



Occupational Safety and Health Administration 



occupational health standards 



comments 



Air Force Chief of Safety 



Air Force Safety Center
Exhibit 34.2
  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:







We have examined the accompanying management’s assertion, that theTrust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Nissan Auto Receivables 2008-B Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction, the Nissan Auto Receivables 2008-C Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction and the Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-A Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction  (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2012.  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2012, is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/ KPMG LLP




Chicago, Illinois


May 25, 2012
Exhibit 32.1​


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) of GSV Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark D. Klein, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

​


|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

​/s/ Mark D. KleinName: Mark D. KleinDate: April 18, 2019
#### IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION NO. 544.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for review of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion Number 544, entitled, *Conflict of*Interest— *Client Information to Funding Sources of Non-Profit Legal Services Project,*is denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6240]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF VICTORY IN EUROPE

  Mr. DODD. Mr. President, today marks the anniversary of one of the 
most important moments in modern Western history. Fifty years ago 
today, the Allied Powers accepted the unconditional surrender of Nazi 
Germany, ending the most devastating war in world history. It was a 
great victory for freedom and for civilization.
  The Allied victory was one of courage, valor and enormous sacrifice. 
Of the hundreds of major battles fought during the war, 15 resulted in 
casualties numbering no less than 5,000. From the beaches at Omaha to 
the great campaigns in Europe, American lives were sacrificed in the 
name of freedom.
  The victory in Europe marked the end of unparalleled human horror and 
of catastrophic human loss on that continent. It signified the end of 
one of civilization's darkest moments. In essence, V-E Day marked the 
very rebirth of life in Europe's scarred, and war-torn landscape. But 
that rebirth did not come without a price.
  We must never forget the sacrifices made to ensure our final victory. 
Of the 400,000 American soldiers who died in this horrible war, most 
lost their lives on the ground, in the trenches--literally clawing for 
victory inch by inch. The magnitude of the human price of this effort 
should command our deepest personal respect. We can never adequately 
thank our veterans for their supreme sacrifice.
  Yet, through the images of fire and the remnants of ashes rises the 
hope that never again will we face such darkness. Never again will we 
face the prospect of such global sacrifice. Never again will the forces 
of freedom be asked to lay down their lives en masse in the name of 
peace and order.
  Today marks the seminal moment in the American chapter of the War in 
Europe. It reminds us of our absolute resolve to maintain and preserve 
what is right and just. I join my colleagues in what is perhaps one of 
our most solemn moments in recognition of those who sacrificed so much 
for our freedom.
  Mr. President, in honor of our fallen veterans, I rise in humble 
tribute.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2011-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Xerox Education Services, LLC, as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RODNEY HENDERSON.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 74 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6199-S6200]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         RECESS UNTIL 1:50 P.M.

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, and my colleagues who are not on the floor 
but are probably in their offices, we are waiting for an amendment to 
be drafted. It may be another 15 to 30 minutes. Rather than have the 
Senate in session, I will move in a second that we recess for 30 
minutes.
  It is our hope to have an amendment prepared on which we will vote 
Monday, followed by a cloture vote on Tuesday. We are trying to reach 
that agreement, and right now they are in the process of drafting the 
amendment.
  I move that we stand in recess until 1:50.
  The motion was agreed to.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 1:16 p.m., recessed until 1:51 p.m.; 
whereupon, the [[Page S6200]] Senate reassembled when called to order 
by the Presiding Officer (Mr. Coverdell).
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Chair, in his capacity as a Senator from 
the State of Georgia, suggests the absence of a quorum. The clerk will 
call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. DeWine). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Kopin Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Sneider, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: May 4, 2010By:

/S/ RICHARD A.
SNEIDERRichard A. SneiderChief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 SecAF visits RAF MildenhallPublished Feb. 24, 2020
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Luke Milano
                        
                        
                        100th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **RAF MILDENHALL, United Kingdom (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Barbara M. Barrett met with RAF Mildenhall Airmen and families and toured the installation for the first time, Feb. 13.The 25th Secretary of the Air Force visited the air traffic control tower, fire station and various units within the 352 Special Operations Wing.Barrett spoke to members of RAF Mildenhall about the team’s mission, Air Force modernization and listened to their innovative ideas on how to improve the installation.“This is a key base for the United States, and a key opportunity for us to work well with our allies and partners,” Barrett said. “It’s terrific to see the joint work that our Airmen are doing with the leadership from the United Kingdom and working from here on missions from many geographical locations.”Being the first Secretary of the Space Force and a trained astronaut, she emphasized the importance of developing the Defense Department’s newest military branch.“It is very exciting to be a part of the stand-up for the Space Force,” Barrett said. “We all use space, but many people don’t think about how much space plays a role in their lives. It’s important for us to defend those assets that make our way of life possible. We need to be prepared to deter belligerent action in space.”Barrett also expressed her admiration for the people at RAF Mildenhall.“I’d like to add my great appreciation for the men and women I’ve had the privilege to interact with,” Barrett said. “From the extraordinarily innovative training, to the maintenance teams who have done great things, to the selfless operators who are flying in the aircraft. It’s wonderful to see how well this base is operating.”FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



USAFE 



U.S. Air Forces in Europe 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force Barbara M. Barrett 



RAF Mildenhall 



modernization 



innovation 



space force 



Secretary of the Space Force 



Distinguished Visitor 



DV 



tour 



Base tour