alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          19,543
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,886
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            212,044
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            9,727
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             68,363
<PP&E>                                          15,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 687,534
<SHORT-TERM>                                    23,190
   
<PAYABLES>                                     304,623
    
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   220,083
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              12,896
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,377
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
   
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,003
    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   687,534
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                2,039
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             8,462
<COMMISSIONS>                                   34,317
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,739
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    2,144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,558
   
<COMPENSATION>                                  28,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,508
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,508
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31

    
   
        



    

</TABLE>
#### LAWRENCE JAMES ROSENBERG, ETC. v. MICHAEL J. CAHILL, M.D.

February 28, 1984.

Motion for leave to appeal granted.
Verbal
Agreement for Office Space


 


I, Salvador
Rosillo, agree to allow the company HempAmericana, Inc. to use the office space located at 78 Reade Street, Suite 4FW New
York City, NY 10007 for office space and other business purposes rent free for as long as I feel it is financially plausible
and reasonable for me to do so.


 


Sincerely,





/s/ Salvador Rosillo


May 30, 2014
EXHIBIT 99c

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coronation
Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Miller, in my capacity as Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.


|Date: March 31, 2003 | /s/Harry
    Miller
    
    _______________________
    Harry Miller, C.E.O and C.F.O
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”),I, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                     theAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs |                    |
|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Jeffrey P. Jacobs       |
|   | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:                 | March 29, 2006          |
|        |                       |                         |  |

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BAY IGNACIO MENDIVIL-SILVA,

a.k.a. Bay Ignacio Mendevil-Silva,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10098

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00795-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Bay Ignacio Mendivil-Silva appeals from the 78-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of 

21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1) and 960(b)(1)(A)(ii), and possession with intent to

FILED

DEC 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10098

distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(ii)(II). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Mendivil-Silva contends that remand is required because the district court

did not recognize its discretion to vary from the advisory sentencing Guidelines

range pursuant to Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). The record

belies that contention. The district court understood that had discretion to vary but

concluded that a within-Guidelines sentence was appropriate for Mendivil-Silva.

To the extent that Mendivil-Silva also contends that his sentence was

substantively unreasonable, the contention fails. In light of the totality of the

circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the 78-

month sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007). 

AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects 63 officers, civilians for test pilot schoolPublished Dec. 21, 2017
                        
                        By  Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 63 primary and alternate students to attend training at the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Naval, British and French test pilot schools, with classes starting next summer.
The selection board met in July and considered total force officer and civilian candidates for test pilot, test combat systems officer, test remotely piloted aircraft pilot and flight test engineer. 
“Test pilot school ensures Air Force mission dominance by training highly qualified officers and civilians to lead and conduct full-spectrum testing and evaluation of aerospace weapons systems,” said Maj. Daniel Kimball, assignments officer at the Air Force’s Personnel Center. “Also, by engaging in exchange programs with the Naval Test Pilot School and our allies, we develop stronger joint and international relationships.”
 
The TPS graduates will have a profound strategic impact on the development of future combat capabilities, Kimball added.
The USAF TPS trains pilots, combat systems officers and engineers to develop, test and evaluate the newest aircraft and weapons systems. In addition, the school conducts exchange programs with the U.S. Naval, British and French test pilot schools to train fixed and rotary wing pilots and flight test engineers. 
Program graduates will earn a master of science in flight test engineering through Air University. 

The selection list is available on myPers from a CAC-enabled computer. To view the list, select “Any” from the dropdown menu and search “Test Pilot.”Prior to posting the list on myPers,the Air Force’s Personnel Centerprovided senior raters with advanced knowledge of the selectionlistto allow notificationsthrough the chain of command.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit myPers. Eligible individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.Air University 



officer 



education 



selection 



Air Force Personnel Center 



civilian 



Flight Test Engineering 



Naval Test Pilot School 



TPS 



Test Pilot 



Edwards 



aerospace weapons 



USAFTPS 



Empire 



EPNER 



AFPC 



assignment
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2014 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the ”Report”), I, G. Hunter Haas, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Investment Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the Report.





It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934











February 26, 2015

/s/ G. Hunter Haas, IVG. Hunter Haas, IV

Chief Financial Officer and

Chief Investment Officer
#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN C. TARANTINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 5, 1985.

ORDER

JOHN C. TARANTINO, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1973, of EAST ORANGE having been found guilty of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and unlawful interstate travel, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that, pursuant to *R.*l:20-6(a)(l), JOHN C. TARANTINO is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of the ethics complaint against him, effective immediately, and until the further order of this Court, and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN C. TARANTINO is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
#### Clendenning *v.*State.

Opinion delivered September 25, 1922.

1. Criminal law — failure of record to show that jury was sworn. — Where the record in'a felony case fails to show that the jury was sworn as required by statute, a conviction will be reversed.

2. Criminal law — failure to prove venue. — Where there was no evidence tending to show where the alleged offense was committed, a conviction will be set aside.

3. Criminal law — failure to prove when offense was committed. — Where the State failed to prove that the defendant made mash and possessed an unregistered still subsequent to the enactment of Acts 1921, p. 372, convictions for such offenses will be reversed.

*5974. Criminal law — judicial notice. — The courts will not take judicial notice of the location of property owned by a private corporation.

Appeal from Mississippi Circuit Court, Osceola District; *E. E. L. Johnson,*Judge;

reversed.

*D. F. Taylor*and *Prewitt Semmes,*for appellant.

J. *8. Utley,*Attorney General, *Elbert Godwin*and *W. T. Hammoch,*Assistants, for appellee.

McCulloch, C. J.

Two separate indictments against appellant were returned by tbe grand jury for tbe Osceola District of Mississippi County, one charging the crime of making mash, and the other the crime of keeping an unregistered still. The two cases were consolidated by consent and tried together, and the result was appellant’s conviction under both charges.

The Attorney General confesses error on three grounds; first, that the record fails to show that the trial jury was sworn as required by statute; second, that there was no proof tending to establish the venue; and third, that there was no proof tending to show the commission of either of the offenses after the enactment of the statute creating the offenses, which was approved March 23, 1921, Acts 1921, p. 373.

We are of the opinion that the confession of error is well founded and that the judgment must be reversed on each of the grounds stated above. A careful search of the record discloses nothing which shows that the trial jury was sworn, nor is there any evidence tending to show where the alleged offenses were committed. Witnesses testified that they found the mash and still at the home of appellant, on the property of the Three States Lumber Company, but the record does not show whether that property was in Mississippi County, or elsewhere. The trial court could not take judicial knowledge of the location of individual property, or property owned by a •private corporation.

The State also failed to prove the dates of the alleged offenses, and failed to prove that the time appel*598lant made the mash and had the still in his possession was subsequent to the date of the enactment of the statute creating those offenses.

It is unnecessary to discuss other assignments of error, for upon the grounds stated above the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EAVIN CHAMBERS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 35 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND THE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>             0000771934
<NAME>            Atlantic Gulf Communities Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         4,368
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  6,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                  125,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                        12,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (1,664)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               150,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                      135,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         76,857
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       1,283
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (95,658)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 150,287
<SALES>                                                       20,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              25,024
<CGS>                                                         17,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 22,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               5,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             3,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (13,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (13,950)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (1.13)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-188007 on Form S-3 of our reports datedMarch 9, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Pingtan Marine Enterprise Limited, its subsidiary, and itsvariable interest entities (the “VIEs”) (collectively the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pingtan Marine Enterprise Limitedfor the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015.

 

/s/BDO China Shu Lun Pan Certified Public Accountants LLP

 

Beijing,China

October6, 2016
Exhibit 99.78
 
 News
Release
 Theratechnologies Announces Publication of Second Phase 3 Results in JAIDS
 Montreal, Canada  March 1, 2010  Effects of Tesamorelin, a Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor, in HIV-Infected
Patients With Abdominal Fat Accumulation: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial With a Safety
Extension JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndromes http://journals.lww.com/jaids/pages/default.aspx
  About HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy
  About Theratechnologies
  Contact:      communications@theratech.com
 Theratechnologies Inc.    
News United States Air Force
 C-130 aircrew exercises combat airdrop capabilityPublished Nov. 27, 2018
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Christopher Hubenthal
                        
                        
                        379th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar (AFNS) --**
                From food and water to ammunition and equipment, ground forces in the region receive critical assets thanks to C-130 Hercules aircrews like those from the 746th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron stationed at Al Udeid Air Base.On Nov. 14, 2018, one 746th EAS aircrew used a delivery method known as an “airdrop,” releasing 16 bundles of goods and equipment from an airborne C-130 to ground troops at an undisclosed location in Southwest Asia.“We bring tactical airlift, which is the capability to move equipment, supplies and people downrange to where they need to be to engage in the fight,” said Lt. Col. Frank Wilde, 746th EAS commander. “Airdrop is critical to the ground forces...the ones engaged in combat. It’s critical to resupply them so they can continue (the) mission.”Resupplying service members through airdrop provides a safer way to get vital assets to those who need it.“A capability of airdrop operations is that it reduces risk to ground forces,” said Lt. Col. Robert Coffey, 746th EAS C-130 navigator. “We dropped 32,000 pounds of combat capable supplies and assets. If you had to truck that to an austere location it would put ground forces and equipment at risk. With air drop we can put it precisely where we want it and get it to the ground forces within minutes.”Although this was only the team’s second mission in theater, aircrew members credited mission success to home-station training and the combined expertise of diverse joint support elements.“From our perspective the mission went smoothly,” said Maj. Christopher Clinton, 746th EAS C-130 aircraft commander. “It’s a culmination of a lot of training. A lot of the pieces of the mission happened just as we trained for. For a lot of us it’s no different from what we do at home. Training prepared us for this.”“It was a team effort to get this all done,” added Master Sgt. Jason Harvey, 746th EAS C-130 loadmaster. “From tactics to scheduling to crews to ground support...not just Air Force, we’re talking Army, Navy...it’s a joint effort.”Along with airdrop capabilities, 746th EAS Airmen enable the larger airlift mission, bringing aeromedical evacuation support and cargo transportation capabilities to the region as well.Air Force 



aeromedical evacuation 



AF 



loadmaster 



Hercules 



Tactical Airlift 



746th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron 



746th EAS 



cargo transportation 



C-130
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         209,253
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,360,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                   176,823
<INVENTORY>                                    906,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,492,821
<PP&E>                                       1,054,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 920,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,949,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          666,472
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,165
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,315,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,949,053
<SALES>                                      1,254,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,253,405
<CGS>                                          777,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,207,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,613
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,165)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 18,165
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF A.R., A JUVENILE.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.