alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.35
 MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT
Regulation 51-102 Respecting Continuous Disclosure Obligations
Form 51-102F3
 1.
    
    NAME AND ADDRESS OF COMPANY:THERATECHNOLOGIES INC.
2310 Alfred-Nobel Boulevard
Montreal, Québec
Canada H4S 2B42.
    
    DATE OF MATERIAL CHANGE:February 3, 20113.
    
    NEWS RELEASE:A news release describing this material change was issued on February 3, 2011 on
Marketwire. A copy of the news release is available on the SEDAR website at
www.sedar.com.4.
    
    SUMMARY OF MATERIAL CHANGE:On February 3, 2011, Theratechnologies Inc. (the Company) announced the execution of a
distribution and licensing agreement (the Agreement) with Ferrer Internacional S.A.
(Ferrer) for the commercialization rights to tesamorelin in Europe, Russia, South
Korea, Taiwan and certain central Asian countries for the treatment of excess abdominal
fat in HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy.5.
    
    FULL DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CHANGE:On February 3, 2011, the Company announced the execution of the Agreement with Ferrer for
the commercialization rights to tesamorelin in Europe, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan and
certain central Asian countries for the treatment of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected
patients with lipodystrophy.Under the terms of the Agreement, Ferrer will be responsible for conducting all
regulatory and commercialization activities in connection with tesamorelin for the
treatment of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy in the
territories subject to the Agreement. Theratechnologies will be responsible for the
manufacture and supply of tesamorelin to Ferrer. Ferrer will purchase tesamorelin at a
transfer price equal to the higher of a significant percentage of the net selling price
and a predetermined floor price. Theratechnologies has the option to co-promote
tesamorelin for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected patients with
lipodystrophy in the territories. Theratechnologies has kept all development rights to
tesamorelin for other indications and will be responsible for conducting research and




---



##### 



development for any additional programs. Ferrer has the option to enter into a
codevelopment and commercialization agreement using tesamorelin relating to any such new
indications. The terms and conditions of such a co-development and commercialization
agreement will be negotiated based on any additional program chosen for development.6.
    
    RELIANCE ON SUBSECTION 7.1(2) OR (3) OF NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-102:Not applicable.7.
    
    OMITTED INFORMATION:Not applicable.8.
    
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER:For further information, contact Jocelyn Lafond, Vice President, Legal Affairs, and
Corporate Secretary of the Company at (514) 336-4804, ext. 288.9.
    
    DATE OF REPORT:February 10, 2011
 - 2 -
News United States Air Force
 Helping F-35A pilots operate, survive at Red FlagPublished Feb. 6, 2019
                        
                        By 388th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                        
                        
                        388th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                The F-35 Lightning II is lethal and survivable in almost any environment, but it’s just a machine, unable to do anything without a skilled pilot. Those pilots need gear to interface with the jet, operate and survive. 
Outfitting the pilots is the job of the Airmen in the 388th Operations Support Squadron Aircrew Flight Equipment shop. A handful are currently deployed to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, for Red Flag 19-1. 
Red Flag is the Air Force’s premier combat training exercise where units from across the Air Force join with allied nations in a “blue force” to combat a “red force” in a variety of challenging scenarios over three weeks. 
“I love it,” Tech. Sgt. Anthony Farnsworth said. “We like Red Flag because we get to focus entirely on the job here just like we would if we were actually deployed.”
Farnsworth and his team show up hours before the mission begins and work on checking and preparing anything and everything pilots need to fly the jet or survive in case of an emergency – jackets, harnesses, G-suits, oxygen masks, helmets, survival kits and parachutes.
“I love being part of the F-35 program, because it’s new and advanced” Airman 1st Class Ryan Joplin said. “The helmet is really integrated with the jet and the pilot. We’re responsible for keeping up the helmet and we’re the first one they come to for help.” 
As Joplin inspects helmets, Airman 1st Class Henri Steel uses a compressor to pump air into a G-suit to ensure it can withstand the pressure.
“They need this G-Suit to work. These bladders fill up with air and compress around their legs to keep their blood circulating so they don’t lose consciousness when they’re pulling Gs,” Steel said “I know what I’m doing is important.” 
All of the Airmen say that while the job is rewarding and they know they have a direct impact on the mission, the thing they enjoy most is their relationship with the pilots. 
“We get to see them on a day to day basis, communicate with them,” Joplin said. “It’s nice to relate to them as humans rather than just as uniforms.”F-35 Lightning II 



F-35 



388th Operations Support Squadron Aircrew Flight Equipment 



388th AFE 



Red Flag 19-1 



Nellis Air Force Base 



Nevada 



allied nations 



red force 



blue force 



jackets 



harnesses 



G-suits 



oxygen masks 



helmets 



survival kits 



Parachutes
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CURTIS WILLIAMS.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Ketchikan, Alaska, September 30, 2010. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2008.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 30, 2010 at 6 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Ketchikan—Misty Fiords Ranger District, 3031 Tongass Avenue, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send written comments to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, c/o District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK 99901, or electronically to Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator at                         *ddaniels@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator Ketchikan—Misty Fiords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 228-4105.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: August 31, 2010.

Jeff DeFreest,

District Ranger. 

[FR Doc. 2010-22320 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Central Jersey Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, James S. Vaccaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 30, 2010
/s/ James S. VaccaroJames S. VaccaroChairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
News United States Air Force
 Airfield systems Airmen prepare for AFSC mergePublished Oct. 25, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Kathryn R.C. Reaves
                        
                        
                        20th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. (AFNS)  --**
                Airmen assigned to the 20th Operations Support Squadron at Shaw Air Force Base are getting ahead of the curve by preparing for an Air Force specialty code merger scheduled for November 2017.
Currently separated into two shops, ground radar systems and airfield systems Airmen have begun working together to meet training milestones and increase their understanding of the work their coworkers do.
The Airmen will also be aligned with their industry counterparts who perform all ground radar and airfield systems tasks under one career field. 
“We’re still learning how the merger will impact us,” said Staff Sgt. Anthony Marple, 20th OSS airfield systems noncommissioned officer in charge. “But, we know what worked and what didn’t work in the last two mergers, so we’re using those tools to get ahead of it.”
Once the merger is complete, all technicians will be expected to have a working knowledge of how to maintain the equipment each section was previously responsible for. This includes all ground-to-air communications, navigations and weather systems, as well as the radars air traffic controllers use to guide aircraft.
Staff Sgt. Rajiv Shetty, 20th OSS ground radar systems NCO in charge, said the Airmen developed a training strategy by learning from past experiences such as the merge of the ground radio and meteorological navigation career fields. The plan outlined milestones and deadlines each team member should reach, as well as solutions for potential issues.
If a technician from either shop is called out to perform a task, their counterpart will accompany for on-the-job training, said Airman 1st Class Darricka Sides, 20th OSS airfield systems technician. This process of teaching others also helps Sides learn more and become more proficient in her job. 
However, airfield systems Airmen may not have the chance to obtain hands-on training with the equipment due to the limited time radars are down for maintenance, therefore, formal training is available at Keesler AFB, Mississippi.
As they achieve their training, the 20th OSS Airmen also improve their teamwork skills.
“Each shop was used to doing things their own way, but working to help train each other has led to more togetherness,” said Shetty. “It may be a challenge to consolidate, but we welcome the challenge of this merger.”20th Fighter Wing 



team shaw 



Shaw AFB 



20th Operations Group 



merge 



AFSC 



Airmen 



airfield systems 



ACC 



20th operations support squadron 



Air Force Specialty Code 



ground radar systems 



training 



Teamwork 



skills 



Merger
#### MAYO S. SISLER AND MAYO S. SISLER AND APT-TO-ACRES, INC. v. COURIER-NEWS CO.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification granted. (See 199 *N.J.Super.*307)
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Brian Chase, Chief Financial Officer of Garrison Capital Inc., certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Garrison Capital Inc.; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a)

          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)

          [Omitted]; c)

          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)

          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)

          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)

          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 12, 2014 By:

          /s/ Brian Chase Brian Chase Chief Financial Officer
#### PARISH *v.*HEDGES. (1)

Appeals; Citation; Waives.

1. Qucere,—whether the rule of court requiring the issuance and service upon the successful party of a citation on an appeal to this court applies to an interlocutory order from which an appeal has been specially allowed by this court, as well as to final judgments and decrees.

2. The acceptance of service by the appellee of the designation by the appellant of the parts of the record to be included in the transcript of the record on appeal is a waiver by the appellee of citation. (Following *Leonard*v. *Rodda,*5 App. D. C. 256, and *Dowling*v. *Buclcey,*26 App. D. C. 266.)

No. 2050.

Submitted October 15, 1909.

Decided October 15, 1909.

Hearing on a motion by the appellee to dismiss an appeal.

*Denied.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. Henry E. Davis*and *Mr. John E. Laskey*for the motion.

*Mr. Holmes Conrad*and *Mr. Leigh Robinson*opposed.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Appellee, Henry C. Hedges, has moved to dismiss this appeal because of the failure to issue and serve a citation upon the allowance of the same. It is a special appeal from an interlocutory order entered in a probate proceeding, that was allowed by order of this court in the exercise of the discretion committed to it by law in such cases. It has been argued by appellant, Emily E. Parish, that the rule requiring citation in case of appeals applies only to final judgments and decrees, and not to *21appeals from interlocutory orders in a pending cause, because tbe parties are in court, and bound to take notice of all proceedings until tbe final termination of tbe suit. Certainly, the reason for requiring notice in tbe latter class of appeals is not so strong as in the first, but we deem it unnecessary to determine tbe question raised. Assuming tbe rule applies equally to both,, tbe motion, we think, is not well taken.

The object of tbe citation on appeal is to give notice to tbe appellee that an appeal has been taken. This notice be received when be accepted the service of the designation of tbe parts of the record to be included in tbe transcript. This acceptance of notice was bad without condition or objection, and therefore amounted to a waiver of tbe regular citation. *Dowling*v. Buckey, 26 App. D. C. 266; *Leonard*v. Rodda, 5 App. D. C. 256, 262.

The motion is *denied.*
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DR. ARNOLD FUSCO.

March 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Elson *v.*The New York Equitable Insurance Co.

Where the defendant appears in the cause, though he omit to answer, he is entitled to notice of the adjustment of the costs; and a judgment entered without such notice, is irregular.

Aug. 1st, 1849.

Motion to set aside a judgment entered by default. The defendant served notice of his appearance, with an order extending the time to answer. The latter being irregularly served, was disregarded, and the plaintiff immediately entered judgment, without giving any notice of the adjustment of the costs.

Duer, J. (The Chief Justice concurring.)

Notice of the adjustment of the costs must be served in all cases where, the defendant has given notice of his appearance in the action. (Amended Code, § 311, 414.) The statute requires this, and the court cannot dispense with it. The former mode of taxing costs without notice, and then giving notice of re-taxing, is no longer *655possible, for the judgment itself is irregular, if notice be omitted after the defendant appears in the action. The judgment must be vacated.
News United States Air Force
 C-130 crashes in GeorgiaPublished May 2, 2018
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                While performing a training mission, a U.S. C-130 Hercules cargo plane from the Puerto Rico Air National Guard crashed about 11:30 a.m. May 2, 2018, near the Savannah Hilton Head International Airport in Savannah, Georgia, with five people on board. Personnel are on the scene responding. A board of officers will investigate the accident.crash 



C-130 



Savannah 



Hercules
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 24, 2010

p1117 

# Order

November 24, 2010

141298

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141298 COA: 295570 Oakland CC: 2007-218331-FH JOSEPH ALBERTO GENTILE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

K ELLY



### , C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases chief master sergeant 18E9 promotion cycle statisticsPublished Dec. 6, 2018
                        
                        By  Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 479 senior master sergeants for promotion to chief master sergeant out of 2,241 eligible for a selection rate of 21.37 percent in the 18E9 promotion cycle.
The average overall score for those selected was 494.05. Selectees’ average time in grade was 2.92 years and time in service was 20.91 years. The average decorations score was 24.19 and the average U.S. Air Force Supervisory Exam score was 74.11. The average board score was 395.75.
The chief master sergeant promotion list is available on the **Enlisted Promotions** page of the Air Force’s Personnel Center website, the Air Force Portal and myPers. Airmen can access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight via the AFPC secure applications page.
Those selected will be promoted beginning in January 2019 according to their promotion sequence number. Prior to posting the list, AFPC provided commanders, senior raters and trusted agents with advanced knowledge of their Airmen’s selection with the intention that selects be notified no earlier than one day before the public release.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.Air Force 



promotion 



AETC 



AF 



Air Force Personnel Center 



Air Education and Training Command 



senior master sergeant 



SMSgt 



joint base 



eligible 



Enlisted Promotion Release 



selection 



chief 



chief master sergeant 



CMSGT 



18E9 



18E9 promotion cycle 



AFPC 



JB San Antonio-Randolph
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               CWO-2 PETER A. DAVIS, AN AMERICAN PATRIOT

  Mr. SMITH. Mr. President, I rise today to salute CWO-2 Peter A. 
Davis, who died April 24, 1995, in a helicopter crash in Williamson 
County, TX. The accident that took the life of this fine man was a 
terrible tragedy for his family and for all those who knew him.
  Mr. Davis, born in Kittery, ME and educated in Laconia, NH, was on 
active duty and has served in the U.S. Army for 21 years. He is the son 
of Phillip and Maria Davis of Laconia. He is also survived by his wife, 
Bonnee Davis and son Nicholas Davis, both of Fort Hood, TX.
  Peter died in service to his country in the U.S. Army. I extend my 
deepest sympathies to Peter's family and friends. As a member of the 
Senate Armed Services Committee, I am honored to represent Peter's 
family in the U.S. Senate. CWO-2 Peter Davis joins a distinguished list 
of American patriots who have given their lives in service to their 
country.

                          ____________________
```