alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of China
United Insurance Service, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  September 28, 2012 | /s/ Lo Chung Mei              | 
|------------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|                          | Lo Chung Mei                  | 
|                          | Chief Executive Officer       | 
|                          | (Principal Executive Officer) |
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**




**CERTIFICATION**






I,
      Arthur
      N. Robins, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Encompass Holdings, Inc.




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings, Inc.
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:




a.
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b.
      Evaluated the effectiveness of Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation.






Date:
      March 14, 2007






/s/
      Arthur N. Robins


Arthur
      N.
      Robins


Chief
      Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAD01000 L12200000.AL 0000]


Meeting of the California Desert District Advisory Council

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Laws 92-463 
and 94-579, that the California Desert District Advisory Council to the 
Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, will 
participate in a field tour of BLM-administered public lands on Friday, 
October 1, 2010, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and will meet in formal 
session on Saturday, October 2, 2010, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the 
BLM Needles Field Office, 1303 S Highway 95, Needles, CA 92363.
    Agenda topics will include updates by Council members and reports 
from the BLM District Manager and five field office managers. Final 
agenda items, including details of the field tour, will be posted on 
the BLM California state Web site at http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/rac/dac.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All Desert District Advisory Council 
meetings are open to the public. Public comment for items not on the 
agenda will be scheduled at the beginning of the meeting Saturday 
morning. Time for public comment may be made available by the Council 
Chairman during the presentation of various agenda items, and is 
scheduled at the end of the meeting for topics not on the agenda.
    While the Saturday meeting is tentatively scheduled from 8 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., the meeting could conclude prior to 4:30 p.m. should the 
Council conclude its presentations and discussions. Therefore, members 
of the public interested in a particular agenda item or discussion 
should schedule their arrival accordingly.
    Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the 
California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, External Affairs, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, Moreno 
Valley, CA 92553. Written comments also are accepted at the time of the 
meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, will be 
incorporated into the minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Briery, BLM California Desert 
District External Affairs (951) 697-5220.

    Dated: August 31, 2010.
Teresa A. Raml,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010-22678 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidus Investment
Corporation (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 3, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ROSS                          
|                    |  |  |  | Edward H. Ross                              
|                    |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                    |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD                       
|                    |  |  |  | Shelby E. Sherard                           
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
News United States Air Force
 8th MDG hosts physical therapy class for South Korean AF pilotsPublished Aug. 16, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Stefan Alvarze
                        
                        
                        8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **KUNSAN AIR BASE, South Korea (AFNS) --**
                The 8th Medical Group held a special pilot-oriented physical therapy class for the South Korean air force’s 111th Fighter Squadron, Aug. 9.
Pilots from the 111th FS participated in the class and learned about exercises that focus on aches and pains associated with flying fighter jets.
“Pilots experience a lot of issues in the neck and back areas from wearing their helmets for long periods of time and putting themselves under a high amount of gravitational forces on a pretty regular basis,” said Tech. Sgt. Nicholas Ramirez, 8th Medical Operations Squadron physical therapy flight chief.
The PT staff went through a variety of stretches, mostly targeting the upper body, to help relieve pain and discomfort the pilots may experience after flying. Many of the pilots began to notice immediate results after being taught and practicing the stretching exercises.
“This is the start of a very valuable and beneficial friendship with the physical therapy team,” said Lt. Col. Choong-Won Oh, 111th Fighter Squadron commander. “We want to invite the 8th MDG physical therapy team to come to our squadron so they can help all of our pilots and continue to teach us how to better care and treat our aches and pains. Everything they taught us was excellent and very beneficial.”
The clinic has the ability to tailor specific classes for whatever their patient needs or requests. If a unit requests a class focusing on running techniques, the PT clinic can customize a program focusing on that. Topics range from proper lifting techniques, exercises to target specific muscles and even exercises specific to bones instead of muscles.
“We’re here to make sure our patients get what they need, whether its information or hands-on training, we can accommodate them,” said Capt. Bridgette Griffiths, 8th Medical Operations Squadron physical therapy flight commander. “Some of our lessons are more informational and hands off, but it’s just as beneficial to the members since we use real world studies and data to support our content.”
The physical therapy class paved the way for more opportunities to present themselves and further strengthen their partnership.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Kunsan AB 



8th MDG 



South Korean Air Force 



pilot 



Physical Therapy 



medical 



healthcare 



PACAF 



pain 



stretch 



exercise 



11th Fighter Squadron 



8th Medical Operations Squadron 



LR
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Todd B. Fortier, certify that:5. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of PDG Environmental, Inc; 6. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 7. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report. 8. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (ii) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and; 5. I have disclosed, based upon my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (iii) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (iv) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By         /s/ Todd B. Fortier         Todd B. Fortier         Chief Financial Officer   Date: January 18, 2007
28
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BENNIE LEE DUMAS.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Thomas J. Barrow *versus*Paul A. Sabbaton.

Double pleas must be signed by counsel,—and if a default be entered against a defendant, who has served double pleas, without the signature of counsel^ the court will not set it aside, except upon an affidavit of merits.

*Mr. Mulock,*in behalf of the defendant,

moved to set aside a default entered against him in this cause. He read an affidavit, showing that the default had been entered after the defendant’s pleas had been received by the plaintiff’s attorney. It appeared that the pleas served were double, a special plea being added to the general issue; but they were not signed by *counsel.*The attorney for the plaintiff had, therefore, treated them as a nullity, and entered a default for want of a plea.

*Mr. D. B. Talmadge,*for the plaintiff,

offered *to*waive the default, if the defendant would file an affidavit of *merits;*but this was declined by the defendant, *Mr. Talmadge*then contended that the pleas should have been signed by counsel to be regular, and that the court would not set aside the default, except upon proper terms. [He cited *Dubois v. Philips, 5 J. R.*236, *Satterlee v. Satterlee,*8 *J. R.*327. *Steward v. Hotchkiss,*2 *Cowen’s R.*634. *Brewster v. Hall,*6 *Ib.*34.]

*Per Curiam.*

By the practice of the Supreme Court, double pleas must be signed by counsel, and those filed by the defendant, are irregular for the want of such signature. The court, in the exercise of its discretion, may, however, set such defaults aside, and will generally do so upon proper cause shown. If these pleas are interposed for delay merely, they are not entitled to favor, and that they are so, the court are compelled to infer, from the fact, that the defendant’s counsel refuses to accept the terms proffered by the plaintiff, and file an affidavit of merits. If he is not willing to give this test of the sincerity of his defence, the court will not interpose to correct an irregularity, for his benefit.

*Motion denied, with costs.*

[E. Curtis, *Att'y for the plff.*W. Mulock, *Att'y for the*deft.]
exh_101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 



Fiscal Year 2015 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Plan of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated


 


Our board of directors has adopted, upon the recommendation of its compensation committee, an annual cash incentive plan for fiscal year 2015 for company executives, including its named executive officers.  The plan is designed to create an incentive for these executives to achieve goals that our board of directors believes align with the short- and long-term interests of our shareholders.  The plan incorporates company financial and operational measures.


 


Each participant in the plan is eligible for a target cash incentive opportunity equal to a specified percentage of his or her respective base salary.  Achievement of the threshold performance level for a particular goal is required before a participant is eligible to receive a payout for that goal.  Performance at the threshold level results in a payout of 50% of the applicable target amount, performance at or above the maximum level results in a payout of 200% of the target amount, and performance between threshold and target levels or between target and maximum levels will result in a pro rata payout.


 


For fiscal year 2015, a portion of each participant’s annual cash incentive opportunity is based on achievement of two company financial goals: annual revenue and the level of the company’s profitability (measured by annual operating income) during the course of fiscal year 2015.


 


The remaining portion of each participants annual cash incentive opportunity for fiscal year 2015 is based on achievement of two company operational goals: one involving the market adoption of the companys optical image stabilization (OIS) actuator product and one involving average cost per suspension assembly produced.


 


The total payout under the plan to any participant will be capped at the target level payout if the company does not report positive earnings before taxes for the full fiscal year.


 


The decisions to make cash incentive payments and on payment amounts are made annually, and payments are made in cash in the first quarter of the following fiscal year.  The compensation committee retains authority to adjust performance goals to exclude the impact of charges, gains or other factors that the compensation committee believes are not representative of the underlying financial or operational performance of our company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         292,609
<SECURITIES>                                    20,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,194,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,677,055
<PP&E>                                      31,483,571
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,882,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,819,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,024,880
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        199
<COMMON>                                         1,760
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,349,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,819,894
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,964,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,829,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,801,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,090,836
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,123,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,123,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,123,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41093

GARY CHAFFIN
Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
ROWAN COMPANIES, INCORPORATED Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

(No. 1:00-CV-206) July 22, 2002

Before Judges WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
EXHIBIT 32.2

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  the  undersigned  officer of Goldman
Sachs Hedge Fund Strategies LLC, hereby  certifies that Goldman Sachs Hedge
Fund  Partners,  LLC's (the  "Company's")  Form 10-K for the  period  ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

                                            /s/ Tobin V. Levy
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Name:    Tobin V. Levy
                                           Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 29, 2005


     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.  1350  and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### JOHN W. TRAYNHAM v. SIDNEY HICKS.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Petition for certification denied.
### SCPW-15-0000964 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
CHRISTOPHER GRINDLING, Petitioner,

vs. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

and STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NOS. 15-1-0347(2), 15-1-0564(4), and 15-1-0968(3)) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )



### Upon consideration of Petitioner Christopher Grindling’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on December 30, 2015, and the record, it appears that Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief or that he lacks alternative means to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-15-0000964 20-JAN-2016 12:49 PM

### means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the

requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 20, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2