Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7151]

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has imposed statutory debarment pursuant to § 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) (22 CFR parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted of violating or attempting to violate Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (“AECA”), (22 U.S.C. 2778).

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         Date of conviction as specified for each person.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisa Studtmann, Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State (202) 663-2980.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. 2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for “statutory debarment” of any person who has been convicted of violating or conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export of defense articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of defense services for which a license or other approval is required.

                    Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not applicable.                          ( print page 54693)    

The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date of conviction. At the end of the debarment period, export privileges may be reinstated only at the request of the debarred person followed by the necessary interagency consultations, after a thorough review of the circumstances surrounding the conviction, and a finding that appropriate steps have been taken to mitigate any law enforcement concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA. Unless export privileges are reinstated, however, the person remains debarred.

Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been satisfied.

Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to this debarment determination on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an exception would be granted only after a full review of all circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors: Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or national security interests; whether an exception would further law enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States; or whether other compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement.

Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily debarred as of the date of their AECA conviction (Name, Date of Conviction, District, Case No., Date of Birth):

(1) Arick Andre Dube, April 1, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama, Case # 1:09-CR-00187-001, June 10, 1981.

(2) Juan Lopez-Hernandez, April 6, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama, Case # 1:09-CR-00187-002, March 16, 1968.

(3) Charles Michael Cartwright, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CR-08-01197-002, October 13, 1988.

(4) Kasey Ray Davis, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CR-08-01197-010, December 9, 1989.

(5)  Adam Wyatt Fuentes, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CR-08-01197-003, November 23, 1983.

(6) Andrew Allen Wild, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CR-08-01197-013, June 28, 1986.

(7) Ian Alexander Witte, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CR-08-01197-011, November 1, 1990.

(8) Rocky Mountain Instrument Company, August 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 1:10-CR-00139.

(9) Amir Hossein Ardebili (aka Amir Ahkami, Alex Dave, Arash Koren), December 14, 2009, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Case #s 1:07-CR-155-01 and 1:08-CR-73-01, July 3, 1974.

(10) Baktash Fattahi, July 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case # 1:09-20298-CR-SEITZ(s)-3, June 26, 1972.

(11) Desmond Dinesh Frank, August 28, 2008, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, Case # 1:07-CR-10382, December 28, 1977.

(12) Yen Ching Peng (aka Alex Peng, Yen-Yo Peng), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case # 1:07-cr-01214-01, March 15, 1976.

(13) Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc., February 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee, Case # 3:08-CR-69-002.

(14) Roberto Aaron Velasco-Tamez, March 3, 2009, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:08-CR-00892-001, March 29, 1988.

(15) Raul Calvillo-Colunga, February 15, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:08-CR-01415-002, February 18, 1990.

(16) Erick Gerardo Martinez-Martinez, February 16, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:09-CR-00713-001, November 20, 1988.

(17) Aaron De Leon, February 16, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:09-CR-01089-001, November 21, 1988.

(18) Rodolfo Palacios, Jr., February 10, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:09-CR-01249-001, July 25, 1991.

(19) Armando Bazan, May 1, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:09-CR-01316-001, October 4, 1963.

(20) Cesar Canales, May 1, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:09-CR-01316-002, December 14, 1958.

(21) Francisco Reyes-Martinez, March 30, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 1:09-CR-01434-001, February 5, 1971.

(22) Pablo Leyva-Angiano, July 19, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:10-CR-00179-001, March 7, 1983.

(23) Ramon Andrade, Jr., July 14, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Case # 7:10-CR-00346-001, July 24, 1970.

(24) Caro-Dominguez, Jaime Omar, June 23, 2010, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Case # 4:10-cr-004-01, August 30, 1998.

As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the date of conviction, the above named persons/entities remain debarred unless export privileges are reinstated.

                    Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in activity regulated under the ITAR (                    *see e.g.,*                     sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate, directly or indirectly, in any export in which such ineligible person may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein.                

This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number where provided.

      ( print page 54694)    
Dated: August 31, 2010.

Thomas M. Countryman,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-22357 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P