alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 AF removes uniform barrier for women, authorizes pants option for mess dressPublished Aug. 4, 2020
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Based on overwhelming feedback from the field, Department of the Air Force officials announced today women may elect to wear pants or a skirt with their mess dress uniform.The changes, which are effective immediately, are outlined in an exception-to-policy memorandum addressed to all Air Force personnel.“It’s our responsibility to provide flexible uniform options that are functional and comfortable for all Air and Space Professionals,” said Lt. Gen. Brian Kelly, deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel and services. “We have a lot of people working really hard to review our existing policies to make sure there are no unintended barriers or unfair practices that may be impacting specific groups of people on our team. We still have our work cut out for us, but this is a step in the right direction in creating an inclusive culture.”Previously, women were required to wear a floor-length skirt with the mess dress uniform. As an interim solution, until women’s mess dress slacks are available for purchase in approximately 18-24 months, women are authorized to immediately purchase and alter men’s mess dress trousers.Alterations for women opting to wear the men’s mess dress trousers will be provided by the Army and Air Force Exchange Service at no cost to the member.“We hear you,” said Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Kaleth Wright. “This is a bit of good news for some of our teammates who’ve wanted this change for a while now. A small thing, but one that I hope can go a long way to helping Airmen realize that we listen, we hear and we care.”Changes will be incorporated in the next update of Air Force Instruction 36-2903, *Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel*. In the interim, for more information, the exception to policy memorandum and frequently asked questions are available on the public website of the Air Force’s Personnel Center at https://www.afpc.af.mil/Career-Management/Dress-and-Appearance/.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



diversity 



women 



Mess Dress 



uniform 



skirt 



pants 



Breaking Barriers 



barriers 



exception to policy 



SAF 



SecAF 



Lt. Gen. Brian Kelly 



CMSAF 



Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright
News United States Air Force
 Air Force announces the 12 Outstanding Airmen of 2019Published July 24, 2019
                        
                        By  Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected the service’s top enlisted members, naming the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year for 2019.
An Air Force selection board at the Air Force’s Personnel Center considered 36 nominees who represented major commands, direct reporting units, field operating agencies and Headquarters Air Force. The board selected the 12 Airmen based on superior leadership, job performance and personal achievements.
Twelve Outstanding Airmen of the Year (alphabetically, by command of assignment when selected):
Master Sgt. Jahara A. Brown, Air Force Materiel Command
Staff Sgt. Caryn N. Frederick, Air Force Reserve Command
Senior Master Sgt. Sylvetris S. Hlongwane, Pacific Air Forces
Senior Airman Gary G. Jeffrey III, Air Education and Training Command
Senior Master Sgt. Andrew J. Kehl, Air Combat Command
Technical Sgt. Inna A. Lvova, Air Force Space Command
Senior Master Sgt. Philip B. McAlpin Jr, Air Force Global Strike Command
Technical Sgt. Andrew C. Merrylees, Air National Guard
Technical Sgt. Kenneth T. O'Brien, Air Force Special Operations Command
Senior Airman Misty A. Richmond, U.S. Air Forces in Europe
Senior Airman Justin A. Starks, Air Force District of Washington
Staff Sgt. Christopher M. Stuebbe, Air Mobility Command
The winners are authorized to wear the Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon with the bronze service star device on the ribbon. They are also authorized to wear the Outstanding Airman of the Year badge for one year from the date of formal presentation.
The MAJCOM nominee list is available on myPers > Recognition >Special Trophies and Awards or select the active-duty enlisted category from the dropdown menu and search “12 OAY.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit AFPC’s public website at **http://www.afpc.af.mil/**.SecAF 



Air Force 



USAFE 



AFRC 



AFPC 



ANG 



PACAF 



AFMC 



AMC 



AETC 



AF 



AFSOC 



AFGSC 



award 



12 OAY 



Outstanding Airmen of the Year 



Outstanding airmen 



JB San Antonio-Randolph 



AF District of Washington 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



ACC. AFSPC 



OAY 



LR
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2697 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2697

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to clarify the application of the 
   qualified mortgage rule to rural lenders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2014

 Mr. King (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to clarify the application of the 
   qualified mortgage rule to rural lenders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUALIFIED MORTGAGES FOR RURAL LENDERS.

    Section 129C(b)(2) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 
1639c(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (E)(vi)(II), by striking ``a limit set 
        by the Board'' and inserting ``1,000 per year''; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following:
                    ``(F) Rural.--The term `rural' means any area other 
                than--
                            ``(i) a city or town that has a population 
                        of greater than 50,000 inhabitants; and
                            ``(ii) any urbanized area contiguous and 
                        adjacent to a city or town described in clause 
                        (i).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### George Bloomingdale v. Leonard Chittenden.

*Infants*— Transfer *of property*— Replevin.

An infant cannot be bound by a transfer of Ms property wMch cannot possibly be for his benefit, and an action lies at once, in his name by a next friend, to recover the property from the unauthorized holder.

Case made from Ionia. (Smith, J.)

Argued April 11, 1889.

Decided April 24, 1889.

Eeplevin. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Clark H. Gleason,*for appellant.

*Frank A. Rodgers,*for plaintiff.

Campbell, J.

Eeplevin was brought against defendant for a colt belonging to the infant plaintiff. It appears by the special finding that the colt belonged to the boy, and was included in a bill of sale signed by him *699with his father and mother, made to defendant, without consideration, and with no intention of passing title. The purpose of the parties was to keep it from being seized by the father’s creditors. There could be no fraud in preventing creditors from seizing what they had no-right to seize. But this infant could not be bound by a transfer of his property which could not possibly be for his benefit, and still less by a formality which no one supposed was meant to divest his title. Such a transfer is not presumed to be binding for any purpose, and an action lies' at once to resume the property from the unauthorized holder, and it is properly brought in the infant’s name by his next friend. There is nothing in the finding to invalidate the proceeding as brought, and the objections urged on the argument are of no account.

It may be remarked that the printed record ■ shows neither exceptions nor assignments of error. If none was filed, there is nothing to review. But we see no error which could have been relied on.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MSO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report). I, Albert Henry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
for the period ending June 30, 2005, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Albert HenryAlbert Henry Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------

Date: August 5, 2005

25
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Greater NY Medical Care, P.C., as Assignee of Owoeye, Princess, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Offices of Peter C. Merani, P.C. (Eric M. Wahrburg, Esq.), for appellant.Lana Sukhman, Esq., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Mary Kim Dollard, J.), entered December 2, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,119.44.</p><p>ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from a decision of that court dated June 28, 2013 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered December 2, 2014 (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial. </p><p>Following a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court determined that defendant had demonstrated, prima facie, through the presentation of credible expert witness testimony, that the medical services at issue had not been medically necessary and that plaintiff had not rebutted defendant's case. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $3,119.44. In light of the contradiction between the Civil Court's findings and its award, a new trial is warranted.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 22, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
News United States Air Force
 US Air Force aircraft crashes in western IraqPublished March 19, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Reports
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                At approximately 6:45 p.m. GMT March 15, 2018, an Air Force HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopter crashed in western Iraq. The crash does not appear to be a result of enemy activity. This incident is under investigation.The seven Airmen aboard the helicopter were lost in the crash: Capt. Mark K. Weber, 29, of Colorado Springs, Colorado; Capt. Andreas B. O'Keeffe, 37, of Center Moriches, New York; Capt. Christopher T. Zanetis, 37, of Long Island City, New York; Master Sgt. Christopher J. Raguso, 39, of Commack, New York; Master Sgt. William Posch, 36, of Indialanic, Florida; Staff Sgt. Carl Enis, 31, of Tallahassee, Florida; Staff Sgt. Dashan J. Briggs, 30, of Port Jefferson Station, New York."I send my sincere condolences to the families, loved ones and service members who served beside the Airmen who were lost in this tragic accident. My prayers are with all those affected as we honor their lives and service together," said Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson in a statement on Twitter.An accompanying U.S. helicopter immediately reported the crash and a quick reaction force comprised of Iraqi Security Forces and coalition members secured the scene."Our hearts go out to the families and squadron teammates of our fallen," said Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein. "The motto of the rescue community is, 'these things we do that others may live.' I am alive today and serving as CSAF because of them.""We are grateful to the Iraqi Security Forces for their immediate assistance in response to this tragic incident," said Brig. Gen. Jonathan P. Braga, Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve director of operations. "Iraqi Security Forces continue to demonstrate their professionalism, capabilities and flexibility as we continue the fight towards a lasting defeat of (the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria)."SAF 



SecAF 



centcom 



HH-60 



Pave Hawk 



helicopter 



crash 



Iraq 



coalition 



Iraqi security forces 



CSAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Heather Wilson 



chief of staff of the Air Force 



Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein 



Gen. David L. Goldfein 



Central Command 



U.S. Air Force Central Command 



Air Force 



AF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WILLIAM BROWNING, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-344

LT Case No. 16-2007-CF-13721A

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed January 24, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Jeb Branham, Judge. 

William Browning, Wewahitchka, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and David Welch, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., JAY and SOUD, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Derrick Lefcoe, certify, as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations at the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date:  May 19, 2016/s/ Derrick LefcoeDerrick LefcoePresident and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Celebrating generations of military servicePublished May 30, 2017
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Darnell T. Cannady
                        
                        
                        480th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                Three generations of Lundins gathered at the National World War II Memorial May 24, 2017, to celebrate the military service of family members, past and present.It all began when 1st Lt. Nicholas Lundin, the 480th Intelligence, Reconnaissance and Surveillance Wing chief of current operations, was planning his promotion ceremony. He learned early in the process that his grandfather was going to be in Washington, D.C. as part of an honor flight at the same time as his promotion.“Luckily, the timing matched up so that instead of just getting up and knocking out a ceremony, it was something worthwhile,” the younger Lundin said. “It was a great overall experience for everybody involved.”Nicholas’ grandfather served in the Pacific in the U.S. Navy during World War II and was selected to travel to the nation’s Capitol through an honor flight program in Northeast Indiana. The program affords WWII veterans the opportunity to fly for free to visit and reflect at their respective memorial.This was the elder Lundin’s first time visiting the WWII monument, and he said it was the perfect backdrop for his grandson’s promotion ceremony. “I’m happy to be here and help pin on his bars,” said Ray Lundin, Nicholas’ grandfather. “I really felt honored to be here and proud of his accomplishments.”During the honor flight, veterans are accompanied by "Guardian" volunteers who fly with them and escort them throughout the trip, which is a role Nicholas’ dad was honored to fulfill.“I really have been looking forward to this, both my dad and I have really been talking about this for the last month and a half,” said Michael Lundin, Nicholas’ father. “I’ve learned more about what his military career entailed of, and this opportunity helped draw all of that out. To come here and see my son ... I’m certainly proud of him and what he’s accomplished, along with my dad.”The officer presiding over Lundin’s promotion ceremony was honored to be a part of the significant family event.“When someone asks you to be a part of this and recognize the transition in service ... it is a huge honor,” said Lt. Col. Brian Webster, noting the significance of being at the WWII memorial in conjunction with Lundin’s grandfather’s honor flight.“I’m really honored that Nick asked me to be a part of this,” he said.Underneath the Pacific portion of the WWII monument, 1st Lt. Lundin’s new rank was pinned on by his father and grandfather. A crowd of veterans and guardians watched the ceremony and came up afterward to congratulation the new captain.World War II 



promotion 



honor flight 



U.S. Navy 



generations 



480th IRS 



military service 



ACC
Order filed, May 11, 2022

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 22

- 00287

- CR

STEPHEN CHARLES HERNANDEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On App eal from the 207th District Court

Comal County, Texas Trial Court Case CR2016

- 726



### ORDER The reporter’s record in this case was due May 2, 2022

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Frances Janezic , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal , if any, within 30 d ays of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
#### The Atlantic Refining Company, appellant, *v.*Josiah Stokes et al., respondents.

[Submitted December 5th, 1910.

Decided March 6th, 1911.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in *77 N. J. Eq. (7 Buck.) 119.*

*Messrs. French & Richards,*for the appellant.

*Messrs. Wilson & Carr,*for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning.

*For affirmance*— -The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon — 13.

*For reversal*— None.
#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. BRUCE WUNNENBURG AND VIRGINIA WUNNENBURG.

Dec. 10, 1979.

Petition for certification denied. (See 169 *N.J.Super.*417)
News United States Air Force
 BLUE: Blueprint to BattlefieldPublished April 18, 2019
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Getting new technology from the lab bench to the warfighter has taken on new urgency as the Air Force explores innovative ways to move ideas quickly from blueprint to battlefield. Those efforts are already paying off with advancements that are having a direct effect on missions around the world.

</iframe

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.

Related links:
- **The Air Force Research Laboratory: Team AFRL**
- **New Air Force Science & Technology Strategy puts focus on speed**BLUE 



AFBlue 



AFB 



Air Force Blue 



AFTV 



Air Force TV 



AFRL 



Air Force Research Laboratories 



science 



technology 



acquisition
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2649 

To provide certain legal relief from politically motivated charges by the 

Government of Egypt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2014 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. KAINE, and Mr. 

MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide certain legal relief from politically motivated 

charges by the Government of Egypt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM POLITICALLY MOTIVATED 

4 CHARGES BY GOVERNMENT OF EGYPT. 

5 (a) TREATMENT OF CHARGES UNDER UNITED

6 STATES LAW.—For purposes of United States law, and 

7 for activities undertaken within the jurisdiction of the 

8 United States, no verdict, order, warrant, or writ issued 

9 by the Government of Egypt or any court, administrative 

10 tribunal, or other authority of the Government of Egypt 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2649 IS

1 in any instance relating to the legal charges, trial pro2 ceedings, and convictions issued by the Cairo Criminal 

3 Court on June 4, 2013, in ‘‘Public Prosecution Case No. 

4 1110 for the Year 2012’’ against 43 staff of five inter5 national nongovernmental organizations shall be consid6 ered a conviction and no person named in such verdict, 

7 order, warrant, or writ shall be considered to have been 

8 charged, accused, found guilty, or convicted. 

9 (b) RECOGNITION OF CHARGES AS POLITICALLY MO10 TIVATED.—It is the policy of the United States to recog11 nize any legal charges, trial proceedings, and convictions 

12 issued by the Cairo Criminal Court on June 4, 2013, in 

13 ‘‘Public Prosecution Case No. 1110 for the Year 2012’’ 

14 as being politically motivated in origin and invalid. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS