alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Native warrior culturePublished Nov. 22, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Valentina Lopez
                        
                        
                        11th Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) --**
                November has been designated as National American Indian Heritage Month since 1990. This is a time to celebrate the cultures, traditions, histories and acknowledge the contributions of Native Americans.
Capt. Travis Trueblood, 11th Wing assistant staff judge advocate assigned to Joint Base Andrews, is a Native American service member.
Trueblood is half Choctaw, a tribe tracing its ancestry to the Mississippi River Valley area, including parts of present-day Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama and Florida.
His father, William, a Choctaw Indian and Vietnam War veteran, made a big impact on Trueblood’s life and his call to serve.
“My father put a high emphasis and encouragement on my service,” Trueblood said. “He has been a great supporter and [has] given me a lot of advice along the way, and I appreciate that. I want to have the same legacy of service that he had and continue that contribution to the nation.”
Trueblood’s grandfather was in the Army Air Corps, and his great-grandfather was a World War I veteran. Trueblood has someone who has served in his family going all the way back to the American Revolution.
“All of the U.S. indigenous tribes have a warrior culture,” Trueblood said. “The reason for that call to serve goes back to that. This tradition of service is still very strong and when we choose to join the military, it is held in very high regards.” 
Today, Trueblood’s call to serve consists of military crime prosecutions, wetland issues and legal assistance. He works along with Capt. Brian Critz, 11th WG JA reserve coordinator.
“His desire to serve is displayed through his work because he shows a clear interest in his job, stays connected with the unit, and wants to be as supportive as he can be by volunteering for additional projects,” Critz said. “He’s been a very productive and valued member.”
The Air Force's productivity depends upon our nation’s greatest strength—our remarkably diverse people.
“Diversity in the Air Force strengthens the community,” Trueblood said. “It aids in accomplishing the mission to respond, honor, defend, support and care not only for Native Americans, but for all Americans of different backgrounds, ethnicities, cultures and lifestyles.”diversity 



staff judge advocate 



veteran 



11th Wing 



culture 



Army Air Corps 



National American Indian Heritage Month 



JB Andrews 



Choctaw 



American Indian 



Native American
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1996, THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               11,662
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       406,160<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        105,474
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    191,129
<PP&E>                                              637,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                      300,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      909,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               419,048
<BONDS>                                             337,920
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                125
<OTHER-SE>                                           18,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        909,982
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    322,844
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       215,090<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     21,318<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     44,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   23,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (19,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (19,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (19,894)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM INSTALLMENT
CONTRACTS RECEIVABLE LINES ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS NET OF UNEARNED FINANCE CHARGES.
<F2>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE FITNESS CENTER OPERATIONS LINE, THE
ADVERTISING LINE AND THE CHANGE IN DEFERRED MEMBERSHIP ORIGINATION COSTS
LINE ON THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1996.
<F3>THIS AMOUNT IS THE MEMBER PROCESSING AND COLLECTION CENTERS LINE ON THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LINWOOD BREWSTER.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Maples and Calder

April 20,
2015

Dear Sirs

We have acted as legal advisers as to the
laws of the Cayman Islands to Xunlei Limited, an exempted limited liability company incorporated in the Cayman Islands (the Company), in connection with the filing by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) of an annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014 (Form 20-F).

We
hereby consent to the reference of our name under the heading Item 10. Additional Information  E. Taxation  Cayman Islands Taxation in the Form 20-F, and further consent to the incorporation by reference of the summary of our
opinion under this heading into Xunlei Limiteds registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333200633) that was filed on November 28, 2014.



|                     
|---------------------
|Yours faithfully     
|                     
|/s/ Maples and Calder
|Maples and Calder
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD

<CIK>                         0000771296
<NAME>   INTERSTATE-JOHNSON LANE

       
<S>                             <C>            <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS          9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998    SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-1-1998     OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                           48,366         48,366
<RECEIVABLES>                   402,504        402,504
<SECURITIES-RESALE>              29,530         29,530
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>            10,764         10,764
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>             106,890        106,890
<PP&E>                           12,248         12,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  676,785        676,785
<SHORT-TERM>                     19,313         19,313
<PAYABLES>                      358,345        358,345
<REPOS-SOLD>                     78,191         78,191
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                   0              0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>               24,350         24,350
<LONG-TERM>                      34,338         34,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0              0
<PREFERRED>                           0              0
<COMMON>                          1,433          1,433
<OTHER-SE>                       97,923         97,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    676,785        676,785
<TRADING-REVENUE>                 1,616          5,203
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>              9,859         28,811
<COMMISSIONS>                    49,498        145,040
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>     2,264          6,549
<FEE-REVENUE>                     6,084         15,148 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                5,385         16,479
<COMPENSATION>                   46,044        132,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   5,973         16,933
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>        3,763         10,668
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0              0
<CHANGES>                             0              0
<NET-INCOME>                      3,763         10,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.63           1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.54           1.59
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-03-215-CV

IN RE JEROME D. BROWN	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:	HOLMAN, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DELIVERED: July 29, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) of ROI Land
Investments Ltd. (the “Company”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacities as Principal Executive
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigned’s knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 21, 2015                                 | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                     | 
|/s/ Sebastien Cliche                                 | 
|Sebastien Cliche
        Principal Executive Officer | 



The foregoing certification
is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
---

VIA EDGAR

To:
    United States Securities and ExchangeCommissionRe:
    Tahoe Resources Inc. (the Company)Annual Report on Form 40-FConsent of Expert


This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the Annual
Report). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things,
the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the
Annual Information Form).

I, Thomas L. Drielick, P.E. of M3 Engineering & Technical
Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, hereby consent to:

| |  | the use of my name in connection with my
      involvement in the preparation of the technical report entitled Escobal
      Guatemala Project NI 43-101 Feasibility Studyissued on November 5,
      2014, with effective dates of January 23, 2014 for the Escobal Mineral
      Resource Estimate and July 1, 2014 for the Escobal Mineral Reserve
      Estimate (the Technical Report);
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| |  | references to the Technical Report, or portions
      thereof, in the Annual Information Form; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| |  | the inclusion and incorporation by reference of
  the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Dated the 12th day of  March, 2015/s/Thomas L. DrielickThomas L. Drielick, P.E.


---
News United States Air Force
 2019 Red Flag-Alaska season concludesPublished Aug. 19, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Eric M. Fisher
                        
                        
                        354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AFNS) --**
                Exercise Red Flag-Alaska 19-3, a Pacific Air Forces-sponsored exercise designed to provide realistic training in a simulated combat environment, concluded Aug. 16, 2019.
“For Red Flag-Alaska 19-3, we have participating units from the U.K., U.S., Canada and Australia,” said Capt. Loren Keisling, Red Flag-Alaska 19-3 team chief.
More than 1,500 service members and 100 aircraft participated from more than 12 different units stationed around the world.
The exercise enabled each unit to exchange tactics, techniques and procedures while also providing the opportunity to improve interoperability with joint and combined forces.
Red Flag-Alaska 19-3 was the first iteration of the exercise to include agile combat employment scenarios, which involve landing an aircraft in an austere environment with a maintenance team to refuel and rearm without typical base infrastructure.
“Red Flag-Alaska is our National Defense Strategy in action,” said Col. Benjamin Bishop, 354th Fighter Wing commander. “Being able to exercise capabilities like agile combat employment in a deliberately challenging exercise environment enables our team to build a more lethal force with joint and international partners.”
Red Flag-Alaska has provided U.S. and international partners the opportunity to integrate their forces in a realistic threat environment since its inception as exercise Cope Thunder in 1975.
The next season of Red Flag-Alaska kicks off in the spring of 2020.USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Red Flag 2019 



multinational exercise 



Eielson Air Force Base 



United Kingdom 



U.K. 



Canada 



Australia 



combined forces 



joint forces 



international partners 



LR
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert G. Crockett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Ecology Coatings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended September  30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Ecology Coatings, Inc.





By:

/s/Robert G. CrockettRobert G. CrockettChief Executive Officer

(Authorized Officer)

December 16, 2011




I, Kevin P. Stolz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Ecology Coatings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended September 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Ecology Coatings, Inc.





By:

/s/Kevin P. StolzKevin P. StolzChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

December 16, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 52-040-COL and 52-041-COL; ASLBP No. 10-903-02-COL-BD01] 

                    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the Commission's regulations,                     *see*10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the following proceeding:                 

## Florida Power & Light Company (Turkey Point Units 6 and 7) 

This proceeding concerns petitions to intervene submitted (1) by the Village of Pinecrest, Florida, (2) by Citizens for Safe Energy, Inc., and (3) jointly by Mark Oncavage, Dan Kipnis, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, and National Parks Conservation Association. These petitions were submitted in response to a June 18, 2010 Notice of Hearing and Opportunity to Petition for Leave to Intervene (75 FR 34,777). Petitioners challenge the application filed by Florida Power & Light Company pursuant to Subpart C of 10 CFR Part 52 for a combined license for Turkey Point Units 6 and 7, to be located in Homestead, Florida. 

The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

E. Roy Hawkens, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

Dr. Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

Dr. William C. Burnett, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in August 2007 (72 FR 49,139). 

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of August 2010. 

E. Roy Hawkens, 

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-22178 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-540

In Re: PETER C. SMITH,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-1447-PJM)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter C. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Peter C. Smith, a federal prisoner, brought this petition for

writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on a matter pending before it. Smith had filed a

mandamus petition in district court seeking to compel the United

States Parole Commission ("USPC") to perform a duty allegedly owed

to Smith. The USPC responded and on November 1, 1995, Smith filed

his reply. The USPC moved for summary judgment, dismissal, or

transfer in April 1996; Smith responded in opposition.

Smith brought the current petition seeking an order directing

the district court to act in the USPC mandamus action. Because

there has been recent, significant action in the case below, we

find there has been no undue delay in district court. Consequently,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the

petition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: June 15Published June 15, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look Around the Air Force, AWACS aircraft support an exercise in the Baltics, an Airman’s invention saves the Air Force money and JTACs train with partner nations during Saber Strike 18. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
-Exercise BALTOPS
- Spline Insert Extract
- Saber Strike 18ATAF 



Air Force TV 



Around the Air Force 



AWACS 



Baltops 



Saber Strike 18 



JTAC 



Latvia 



Spline