alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Curtis v. Bridget Crowe.

*Husband and wife*— Contract *for erection of building on land held jointly*— Inability *of wife.*

A wife cannot make a valid contract for the erection of a building upon land owned by herself and husband jointly *(Speier v. Opfer,*73 Mich. 35), but is liable for labor done thereon, at her request, *after*the husband’s death.

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.)

Submitted on briefs February 6, 1889.

Decided February 8, 1889.

*Assumpsit.*Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Charles Flowers (Edwin F. Conely,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Chamberlain & Guise,*for plaintiff.

Chahplin, J.

Prior to January *20, 1886,*William J. Fowler contracted to sell and convey to Thomas Crowe and Bridget Crowe, his wife, lots 1 and 2 of Woodbridge’s subdivison of outlot 109, Woodbridge farm, on Trumbull avenue, in the city of Detroit.

Plaintiff, being a carpenter and builder, on January 20, 1886, entered into a written agreement with Bridget Crowe, in which her husband did not join, to erect a *100building upon said lots according to certain plans and specifications furnished by A. E. French, architect. Bridget Crowe was to furnish all the materials. Curtis' went on and performed labor. Before the house was completed, Thomas Crowe died. Plaintiff claims that, at defendant’s request, he went on after the death of Thomas Crowe, and performed further labor. This was denied by defendant, who claims that she was obliged to and did procure the house to be finished by another person.

Plaintiff brings this suit to recover for labor performed both before and after the death of Thomas Crowe. The court charged the jury that defendant was liable on her contract with plaintiff for labor performed before the death of Thomas Crowe. In this the court erred. Bridget Crowe at the time was a married woman, and could only make a legal and binding contract at law in respect to her separate property. The lots upon which the building was to be erected were not her sole or separate property, but were the joint property of the husband and wife. We think the case is ruled by *Speier v. Opfer,*73 Mich. 35 (40 N. W. Rep. 909). If plaintiff performed labor at her request after the death of Thomas Crowe, he would be entitled to recover for that. This fact should have been submitted to the jury.

The judgment must be reversed, ana a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.
EX-10.32



 Exhibit 10.32 

EXECUTIVE RELOCATION AGREEMENT 
 This
Relocation Agreement is entered into by and between Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. (“Exagen”) and Wendy Swedick (“Employee”) as of the 1st day of April 2014. 

In connection with the Employee’s relocation, Exagen shall provide Employee with the following assistance in relocating to the San Diego, California
area. 
 Reimbursement of Expenses: 
 Exagen will
reimburse Employee for normal expenses listed below. Evidence of expenses must be provided and must be verifiable. 
  

	 	I.	Home Selling Expenses up to a maximum of $30,000. 

  

	 	a.	Title Insurance 


	 	b.	Property Transfer Fees 


	 	c.	Attorney Fees 


	 	d.	Recording Fees 


	 	e.	Realty Fees/Commissions 


	 	f.	Legally required inspection fees 


	 	g.	Required repairs 

  

	 	II.	Household/Vehicle Move up to a maximum of $20,000. 

  

	 	a.	Exagen will pay the cost of packing, shipping and insurance of household goods to the Employee’s new location (either by reimbursing the Employee for the cost to rent a moving truck/van, or through arrangement of
professional movers by Exagen). 


	 	b.	Exagen will also pay the cost of the shipment of one vehicle, owned by the Employee to the new location or driving expenses to the new location at the currently established IRS mileage allowance, at the Employee’s
discretion. 

 Recognizing the Exagen’s desire to relocate the Employee as soon as possible, Exagen will make the Employee whole for the
discount below fair market value, if any, necessary to sell her home in an expedited manner as follows (the Make Whole Payment): 
  

	 	c.	If the Employee has to sell her home for less than the estimated fair market value of $326,000, Exagen till pay the Employee an amount equal to $326,000 less the final closing price of the Employee’s home.


 Tax Adjustments to Reimbursements: 

Exagen will pay a tax adjustment allowance, or gross-up, on any moving expenses or Make Whole Payment that are deemed taxable to the Employee. This allowance
will be based on an estimated incremental tax rate for the Employee. 
  

					
			
	 /s/ Ron Rocca
	 		 	 /s/ Wendy Swedick

	Ron Rocca — CEO, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.	 		 	Wendy Swedick — Employee
		 		 	
			
	 04/04/14
	 		 	 04/04/14

	Signature Date	 		 	Signature Date
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000427

22-DEC-2017

09:33 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0499 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ESANDRO ROMAN RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 24, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 7 2022

09/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0499
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 20, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. Daniel L. Tanner, Canon City, Colorado,*                     to acquire control of Canon Bank Corporation, parent of Canon National Bank, both of Canon City, Colorado.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 30, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-21951 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by CapSource Financial,
Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Fred C. Boethling, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CapSource
Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: September 26, 2003                  By:  /s/ Fred C. Boethling
                                               ------------------------------
                                          Name: Fred C. Boethling
                                          Chief Executive Officer
#### LODI INDUSTRIES CORP. v. KAUFMAN CARPET CO., INC.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>




PROVIDENT AMERICAN CORPORATION                                       EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE


(In thousands except per share data)                 Three Months Ended March 31
                                                         2000           1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary Earnings (Loss) Per Share

NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK:          ($27,697)      ($3,031)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
   Common stock                                          13,051        11,614
   Common stock equivalents applicable to stock
      options and warrants
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Total                                              13,051        11,614
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:                        (2.12)     $  (0.26)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK:           (27,697)     $ (3,031)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
   Common stock                                          13,051        11,614
   Common stock equivalents applicable to stock
       options and warrants                                   *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Total                                              13,051        11,614
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:                  (2.12)     $  (0.26)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 * Anti-dilutive; therefore effects have been excluded.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables
Trust 2011-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 28, 2013





| | By: | /s/
    Min Sok Randy Park                                                                                             
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: President and Secretary

(senior officer in charge of securitization
of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CDEX Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Griffin,
President and Chief Executive Officer (and Chief Accounting and Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 30, 2006                  By:/s/ James Griffin
                                            ------------------
                                            James Griffin
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                            and Chief Accounting and Financial
                                            Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

                Inconnection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DigitalAngel Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2002(the "Periodic Report"), I, James P. Santelli, Vice President -Finance, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 8, 2002 |   | /s/ James. P. Santelli                             |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | James. P. Santelli                                 |
|                  |   | Vice President - Finance,  Chief Financial Officer |
|                  |   | Digital Angel Corporation                          |

 

 

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAULETTE TIEBOUT.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE v. McNEILL

No. 484A95-3

Case below: Cumberland County Superior Court

Application by defendant for writ of habeas corpus denied 20 December 2000.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2733 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2733

 To establish a certification process for opting out of the individual 
                       health insurance mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2014

  Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a certification process for opting out of the individual 
                       health insurance mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Obamacare Opt-Out Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE OPT-OUT.

    (a) Obtaining Exemption.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, an applicable individual (as defined in subsection (d) of section 
5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) desiring an exemption from 
the requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage under section 
5000A(a) of such Code may--
            (1) request a certification from the Secretary of the 
        Treasury, through the State Exchange or Federal Exchange, as 
        applicable, that such individual is exempt from the 
        requirements of section 5000A(a) of such Code, which such 
        secretary shall grant upon request; or
            (2) indicate on the Federal income tax return of such 
        individual that such individual elects an exemption from the 
        requirements of section 5000A(a) of such Code.
    (b) Exemption From Penalty.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (e) of section 5000A of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 
        the following:
            ``(6) Certification of exemption; exemption claims.--
                    ``(A) Certification of exemption.--An applicable 
                individual for any month during the taxable year in 
                which such individual receives a certification of 
                exemption under section 2(a)(1) of the Obamacare Opt-
                Out Act of 2014, and for any month during any 
                subsequent taxable year.
                    ``(B) Exemption claim.--An applicable individual, 
                for any month in a taxable year for which an election 
                for an exemption under section 2(a)(2) of the Obamacare 
                Opt-Out Act of 2014 is made.''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 89th Airlift Wing to fly tribute honoring former presidentPublished Dec. 4, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The 89th Airlift Wing, based at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, will conduct a tribute flight in honor of former President George H. W. Bush with an Air Force VC-25A, over the interment site at College Station, Texas, at 3:55 p.m. CST on Wednesday, Dec. 5.
The Boeing 747 aircraft is one of two VC-25As assigned to the Presidential Airlift Group, 89th Airlift Wing. When the President of the United States is onboard the VC-25A, it is commonly referred to as "Air Force One." For the mission supporting the state funeral, the aircraft call sign is Special Airlift Mission 41, in honor of the former president of the United States.
The 89th Airlift Wing provides global Special Air Mission airlift, logistics, aerial port and communications for the president, vice president, members of Congress, cabinet members, combatant commanders and other senior military leaders.AMC 



SecAF 



SAF 



89th Airlift Wing 



air 



mobility 



Command 



Flyover 



honor 



President 



George HW Bush 



JB Andrews 



VC-25A 



AF 



Air Force 



presidential airlift group Related Links
        Official U.S. State Funeral page
            
            Air Force One feature page