alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

Section 1350 Certification as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Mascot Properties, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 24, 2012

             

By: /s/ David Dreslin

                                           

        David Dreslin

        Principal Executive Officer

        Principal Financial Officer
#### SALVATORE PERILLO v. THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS.

Dec. 4, 1979.

Petition for review of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion Number 423, entitled *Conflict of Interest*— Municipal *Prosecutor Prosecuting Municipal Employees at Hearings and on Appeals,*is granted.
News United States Air Force
 AF releases new guidance on civilian hiring freezePublished Feb. 9, 2017
                        
                        By Richard Salomon
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has released additional guidance in regard to the federal civilian hiring freeze implemented Jan. 23. 
According to the official memorandum, the hiring freeze applies to all executive departments and agencies regardless of their operation and program funding. Military personnel are excluded. Some exemptions are permitted to meet national security mission and public safety responsibilities or to prevent essential services from interruption.  
The Air Force recently released additional implementation procedures in support of a follow-on Feb. 1 memorandum outlining the implementation of the freeze. According to the guidance, all requests for personnel action received by the Air Force Personnel Center by Feb 7, 2017, will continue to be announced, and referral certificates will continue to be issued.  
If tentative job offers were given to selectees before Jan. 22, but with entry dates after Feb. 22, they will be notified of their pending status. Also, as of Feb. 7, AFPC will not be accepting recruit/fill actions without an approved hiring freeze exemption signed by the Secretary of the Air Force. 
Official guidance also calls for the implementation of a long-term plan to reduce the size of the federal workforce through attrition. The Office of Management and Budget, in coordination with the Office of Personnel Management, has been tasked to submit a plan by early May. 
“The Air Force is dependent on a strong civilian workforce to carry out its global mission,” said Christine Armstrong, the Civilian Sustainment and Transition Programs Division chief. “We will continue to work closely with Air Staff to ensure the entire Air Force team receives up-to-date guidance as it becomes available.”
For information concerning non-appropriated fund positions, contact: afpc.svirf.humanresources@us.af.mil
Local civilian personnel offices can also provide additional information. Search “Hiring Freeze” on **myPers** for more information about the freeze and how organizations can submit exemption requests. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the **Air Force Retiree Services** website.JB San Antonio-Randolph 



hiring freeze 



civilian 



force management
## NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 231

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E OLD AMERICAN COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Temporary Relief

.



## ORDER

Before Justices Garza , Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, fi led a petition for

writ of mandamus on April 22, 2014, contending that the trial court abused its discretion

by denying relator’s plea to the jurisdiction. T he Court requests that the real part ies in

interest, Melissa Rosales, or any others whose interest might be directly affected by the

reli ef sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the

expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

21st day of Ap ril, 2014

.
1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3436

___________

Lori M. Metzsch, an individual, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Nebraska.

*

Avaya, Inc., a corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 23, 2005

Filed: December 9, 2005

___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lori M. Metzsch appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in her employment-discrimination action brought under the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), Title VII, and state law. Having

carefully reviewed the record, see Sallis v. Univ. of Minn., 408 F.3d 470, 474 (8th Cir.

2005) (de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court that Metzsch

failed to produce anything showing that the reason for terminating her--her perceived

bad attitude--was a pretext for age or gender discrimination, see Cerutti v. BASF
-2-

Corp., 349 F.3d 1055, 1062 (7th Cir. 2003) (ADEA was not enacted to immunize

older workers from being terminated for legitimate reasons such as bad attitude);

Rose-Maston v. NME Hosps., Inc., 133 F.3d 1104, 1109 (8th Cir. 1998) (Title VII

does not prohibit employment decisions based on, inter alia, personality conflicts).

While instances of disparate treatment can support finding of pretext, see Wheeler v.

Aventis Pharm., 360 F.3d 853, 858 (8th Cir. 2004), Metzsch offered nothing showing

that two younger males--hired at the same time as she for the same position that she

held--complained about their work assignments as Metzsch had done, see id.

(employees are similarly situated when they are involved in or are accused of same

conduct, and are disciplined differently). 

Similarly, we agree with the district court that the conduct Metzsch cited as a

basis for her harassment or hostile-work-environment claim was insufficient to create

trialworthy issues. See Burkett v. Glickman, 327 F.3d 658, 662 (8th Cir. 2003) (for

hostile-work-environment claim to succeed, alleged conduct must be so extreme as

to change terms or conditions of employment). The district court also properly

rejected Metzsch’s contention that an employment contract had been created. See

Ambroz v. Cornhusker Square Ltd., 416 N.W.2d 510, 515 (Neb. 1987) (right to

terminate employee at will should be restricted to exceptions created by statute or

instances where clear public-policy mandate has been violated). Metzsch’s repeated

references on appeal to her unverified complaint are unavailing, because only a

verified complaint is the equivalent of an affidavit for purposes of summary judgment.

See Ward v. Moore, 414 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 2005). 

Metzsch’s remaining arguments, and her numerous challenges to various other

rulings made by the district court, provide no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny as moot her pending motions. 

______________________________
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2801 

To provide for conditions on the renewal of health insurance plans purchased 

through Exchanges. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide for conditions on the renewal of health insurance 

plans purchased through Exchanges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Heath Care Consumer 

5 Choices Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS ON RENEWAL OF HEALTH PLANS PUR7 CHASED THROUGH EXCHANGES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, a qualified health plan purchased by an indi10 vidual through an American Health Benefit Exchange for 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2801 IS

1 plan year 2014 shall not be automatically renewed with 

2 respect to such individual for plan year 2015 unless— 

3 (1) the plan premium for plan year 2015 is the 

4 same as the plan premium for plan year 2014; or 

5 (2) the individual requests such automatic re6 newal of the plan. 

7 (b) DETERMINATION OF PREMIUM.—A plan may be 

8 automatically renewed as described in subsection (a)(1) 

9 only if the cost of the premium to the individual would 

10 be the same for plan year 2015 as for plan year 2014, 

11 before and after application of a premium assistance cred12 it under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 

13 1986, as applicable. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4513-H4514]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        TIME TO BRING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE INTO THE BUDGET DEBATE

  (Mr. BENTSEN asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. BENTSEN. Mr. Speaker, the Republican majority is getting ready to 
make dramatic changes in the Medicare program. I am concerned that the 
American people will not be included in this debate.
  The Republican majority has already missed the deadline to submit a 
budget. To balance the budget and save $1 trillion over 7 years will be 
a difficult task, I admit. However, the Republican majority should 
submit a plan which we all can review. The Republican majority makes 
promises without making the tough choices on how to achieve their 
goals.
  The Republican majority plans to cut Medicare by $300 billion over 7 
years. These cuts will hurt seniors and result in higher costs. It is 
estimated that this will add $900 in out-of-pocket expenses for seniors 
in 2002.
  Democrats have been responsible in reforming Medicare. In the 1993 
OBRA bill, Democrats voted to strengthen the trust fund and made it 
solvent for an additional 3 years. No Republican Members supported 
these important reforms.
  I am also concerned that any Medicare cuts will affect the health 
care industry. In my district, reduction in indirect medical education 
and direct medical education will have devastating consequences. I 
represent the Texas Medical Center which has two medical schools. Any 
medicare reductions in these payments will negatively impact the 
Houston area, and I will work vigorously to oppose these reductions.
  If we are going to balance the budget, the American people should be 
involved and we should all contribute fairly to the solution. Without a 
plan, 
[[Page H4514]] I cannot judge whether this goal will be met.
  The American people deserve to know the details of a plan and we have 
the responsibility to ensure that they are included in this debate.

                          ____________________
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2639 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the number of graduate 

medical education residency positions at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2014 

Ms. BALDWIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

number of graduate medical education residency positions at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Affairs 

5 Health Workforce Enhancement Act of 2014’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2639 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION 

2 RESIDENCY POSITIONS AT MEDICAL FACILI3 TIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7302 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(e)(1) In carrying out this section, the Secretary 

9 shall establish medical residency programs, or ensure a 

10 sufficient number of residency positions in medical resi11 dency programs, at any medical facility of the Department 

12 that the Secretary determines is experiencing a shortage 

13 of physicians. 

14 ‘‘(2) In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary 

15 shall— 

16 ‘‘(A) determine the specialty of health care pro17 fessionals with respect to which each medical facility 

18 of the Department for which the Secretary has made 

19 a determination under paragraph (1) is experiencing 

20 a shortage of physicians, including with respect to 

21 primary care and mental health; 

22 ‘‘(B) allocate the residency programs and resi23 dency positions under paragraph (1) based on the 

24 determination required by subparagraph (A); and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2639 IS

1 ‘‘(C) notify Congress of the information used by 

2 the Secretary to make the determination required by 

3 subparagraph (A).’’. 

4 (b) FIVE-YEAR INCREASE.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out section 

6 7302(e) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 

7 subsection (a), during the five-year period beginning 

8 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec9 retary of Veterans Affairs shall increase the number 

10 of graduate medical education residency positions at 

11 medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Af12 fairs by not less than 2,000 positions. 

13 (2) PRIORITY.—In increasing the number of 

14 graduate medical education residency positions at 

15 medical facilities of the Department under para16 graph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to med17 ical facilities that— 

18 (A) as of the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act, do not have a medical residency program; 

20 and 

21 (B) are located in a community in which 

22 there is a high need for health care for vet23 erans. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54297-54298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Tri-County Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act

[[Page 54298]]

(Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Beaverhead-Deerlodge 
National Forest's Tri-County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on 
Thursday September 23, 2010, from 5 p.m. until 8:30 p.m., in Deer 
Lodge, Montana. The purpose of the meeting is to review proposals for 
Title II funding and accomplishments for projects previously funded 
under Title II.

DATES: Thursday, September 23, 2010, from 5 p.m. until 8:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA building located 1002 
Hollenback Road, Deer Lodge, Montana (MT 59722).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patty Bates, Tri County Resource 
Advisory Committee Coordinator, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 
420 Barrett Road, Dillon, MT 59725, (406) 683-3979; E-MAIL 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda for this meeting include discussion 
about (1) accomplishments during 2010; (2) introduction and orientation 
for new Resource Advisory Committee members; and (3) budget, priorities 
and funding for new project proposals. The meeting is open to the 
public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will 
have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: August 24, 2010.
David R. Myers,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2010-22113 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
Exhibit 33.2



MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE



Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or
“Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d)
of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:



Platform:   Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level
reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities
serviced by American Honda Finance Corporation issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying
agent services; or owner trustee services (the “Platform”).



Applicable Servicing Criteria:   All servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by
the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined
are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).
With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.



Period:  Twelve months ended March 31, 2013 (the
“Period”).



With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the
Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

| | · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | · | The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122
of Regulation AB.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of and for the Period.





| | CITIBANK, N.A.
| | --------------
| |               
| | By:           
| |               
| | Its:          



Dated: May 31, 2013
News United States Air Force
 X-60A program conducts integrated vehicle propulsion system verification testPublished Jan. 15, 2020
                        
                        By Holly Jordan
                        
                        
                        Air Force Research Laboratory Aerospace Systems Directorate
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Research Laboratory’s X-60A program recently achieved a key developmental milestone with the completion of integrated vehicle propulsion system verification ground testing.The X-60A is an air-launched rocket designed for hypersonic flight research. It is being developed by Generation Orbit Launch Services under an AFRL Small Business Innovation Research contract. The goal of the X-60A program is to provide affordable and routine access to relevant hypersonic flight conditions for technology maturation. This test included both cold-flow and hot-fire testing with the Hadley liquid rocket engine developed by Ursa Major Technologies. Flight-like hardware was tested using flight-like operational procedures. The test runs covered full-duration burns, engine gimbaling for thrust vector control, and system throttling.“This test series was a critical step in reducing risk and gathering necessary system integration data in preparation for our upcoming flight tests,” said Barry Hellman, AFRL X-60A program manager. “When we go to flight later this year, we hope to demonstrate the capability of the X-60A to provide affordable access to hypersonic flight conditions, which will position AFRL to deliver an innovative test capability for the Air Force and other DoD organizations.”X-60A is a single-stage liquid rocket primarily designed for hypersonic flight research and is launched from a modified business jet carrier aircraft. It is capable of testing a wide range of hypersonic technologies including airbreathing propulsion, advanced materials and hypersonic vehicle subsystems. The vehicle propulsion system utilizes liquid oxygen and kerosene propellants. The system is designed to provide affordable and regular access to high dynamic pressure flight conditions above Mach 5.During the upcoming flight tests based out of Cecil Spaceport in Jacksonville, Florida, the X-60A will fly at relevant conditions necessary for technology maturation. Data will be collected to validate the overall vehicle design functionality as well as performance predictions.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Wright-Patterson Air Force Base 



Air Force Material Command 



AFMC 



X-60A 



integrated vehicle propulsion system verification test 



hot fire 



Cecil Spaceport 



Air Force Research Laboratory 



AFRL 



air-launched rocket 



hyperspeed 



Generation Orbit Launch Services 



Small Business Innovation 



Ursa Major Technologies