alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Darryl E. Akers, Vice Chairman,
Co-President, and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Robert S. Curtis, Vice Chairman, Co-President, and Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery W. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Poage Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) each certify in their
capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2011 and that to the best of their knowledge:



|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                          
|---------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|January 17, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Darryl E. Akers                                      
|Date:            |  |  |  | Darryl E. Akers                                          
|                 |  |  |  | Vice Chairman, Co-President, & Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                 |  |  |  | (Duly Authorized Representative)                         



|                 |  |  |  |                                                          
|---------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|January 17, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert S. Curtis                                     
|Date:            |  |  |  | Robert S. Curtis,                                        
|                 |  |  |  | Vice Chairman, Co-President, & Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                 |  |  |  | (Duly Authorized Representative)                         



|                 |  |  |  |                                 
|---------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|January 17, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffery W. Clark            
|Date:            |  |  |  | Jeffery W. Clark,               
|                 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer         
|                 |  |  |  | (Duly Authorized Representative)

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Poage Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Poage Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elmer's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 5, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce
N. Davis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Elmer's Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by Elmer's
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Bruce N. Davis
-------------------------------------
Bruce N. Davis
Chief Executive Officer and President
February 18, 2004




























                                       23
EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF GARRISON CAPITAL INC.  Name

          

          JurisdictionGarrison Capital Equity Holdings I LLC

          

          DelawareGarrison Capital Equity Holdings II LLC

          

          DelawareGarrison Capital Equity Holdings III LLC

          

          DelawareGarrison Capital Equity Holdings IV LLC

          

          DelawareGarrison Funding 2013-2 Ltd.

          

          Cayman IslandsGarrison Funding 2013-2 Manager LLC

          

          DelawareGLC Trust 2013-2

          

          DelawareWalnut Hill II LLC

          

          DelawareForest Park II LLC

          

          DelawareGarrison Capital SBIC LP

          

          DelawareGarrison Capital SBIC General Partner LLC

          

          Delaware
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Continental Alloy Wheel Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Andrew J. Befumo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 5th day of April, 2012.
  /s/ Andrew J. BefumoAndrew J. Befumo, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                       478
<INVENTORY>                                     20,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,686
<PP&E>                                          32,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,102
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,758
<SALES>                                         45,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,891
<CGS>                                           36,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,787
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MUSAJ SHIHADEH.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
---

VIA EDGAR

To:
    United States Securities and ExchangeCommissionRe:
    Tahoe Resources Inc. (the Company)Annual Report on Form 40-FConsent of Expert


This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the Annual
Report). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things,
the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the
Annual Information Form).

I, Charles Muerhoff, Vice President Technical Services of the
Company, Reno, Nevada, hereby consent to:

| |  | the use of my name in connection with my
      involvement in the verification of post Feasibility Study technical
      information included the Annual Information Form;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                           
| |  | the disclosure of such post Feasibility Study
      technical information in the Annual Information Form; and                                                             
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                           
| |  | the inclusion and incorporation by reference of
  such post Feasibility Study technical information in the Annual Report.                                                 

Dated the 12thday of March,
      2015/s/Charles
      MuerhoffCharles Muerhoff, SME RM


---
#### TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH v. ALFRED AND ARLENE KRYSPIN.

March 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### HARTER v. VERNON

No. 433P00

Case below: 139 N.C. App. 85

Motion by defendant to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 20 December 2000. Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-32 denied 20 December 2000.
##### 



COLE NATIONAL CORPORATION

Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors (the Board) of Cole National Corporation
(the Corporation) has determined that it is in the
best interests of the
Corporation to amend the Cole National Corporation Amended and Restated
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the
Plan);

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.     The
definition of  Nonemployee Director set forth in Section 2
of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

Nonemployee
Director means a member of the Board who is not an
employee of the Corporation, any Subsidiary, or any person or entity beneficially
owning more than 10 percent of the Common Stock or having a contractual right to
designate a nominee for director.

2.     Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended to include the following
definition, to be inserted after the definition of Pre-Existing Options:

Subsidiary means a corporation, company or other entity (i) more than
50 percent of whose outstanding shares or securities (representing the right to vote
for the election of directors or other managing authority) are, or (ii) which
does not have outstanding shares or securities (as the case may be in a
partnership, joint venture or unincorporated association), but more than 50
percent of whose ownership interests representing the right generally to make
decisions for such other entity is, now or hereafter, owned or controlled,
directory or indirectly, by the Corporation.

3.      This Amendment shall be deemed effective as of November 28, 2001.

4.     Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Plan
remains unchanged and continues in full force and effect.



---



##### 



This Amendment No. 1 to the Cole National Corporation Amended and
Restated Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors has been
executed at Cleveland, Ohio.

| |  |                                
| |  | -------------------------------
| |  | COLE NATIONAL CORPORATION      
|
| |  | /s/  Jeffrey A. ColeName:Title:
|
| |  |
#### McCafferty *v.*Kelly.

On an appeal from a justice’s court, the court below must make a return of all the testimony and proceedings, where a return is ordered. It is not sufficient to make a return as to the particulars in which the affidavits are conflicting.

February 24, 1849.

This was an appeal from the marine court. On moving the *638cause for argument, it appeared that the affidavits were conflicting in some particulars, and a return had been ordered. The return made by the court below, set forth only the testimony in respect of which the parties differed in their affidavits.

*P. Mulvey,*for the appellant.

*Nash & Donohue,*for the respondent.

By the Court. Oakley, Ch. J.

The court below must make a return of all the testimony and proceedings, when a return is ordered, although the affidavits conflict only in a few particulars. Such is the provision of the code. When a return is made, we look solely to that. We cannot look into the affidavits also. If the return here, be insufficient to present the whole case, the parties must call for a further return.

A further return was ordered.
CONSENT OF EXPERT
  
 Reference is made to the feasibility study entitled “Feasibility Study and Technical Report Update on the Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” with an effective date of June 19, 2014 (the “Report”).
  I, David Cormack, on behalf ofSnowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc.(the “Company”), consent to the use of the Company’s name and references to the Report, and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report, in(i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (ii) Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726 and 333-197304) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Very truly yours,
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

June 2, 2014

 

Peter Cohen

 

At the address on record with Cowen Group

 

Dear Peter:

 

This letter amendment (this “June 2014 Amendment”) sets forth the mutual agreement between you and Cowen Group, Inc. to amend your employment agreement, dated June 3, 2009 (your “Employment Agreement”).  Specifically, your Employment Agreement is amended as follows:

 

·                              The third sentence of Section 3(b) is deleted and replaced with the following: “Your Annual Bonus shall be determined by the Compensation Committee consistently with and on the same basis as, and shall have terms and conditions no less favorable than those that apply to, other similarly situates executives of the Company.”

 

You acknowledge that this June 2014 Amendment does not qualify as, and does not entitle you to terminate your employment for, Good Reason under your Employment Agreement. This June 2014 Amendment does not amend any other terms of your Employment Agreement, which remains in full force and effect.  Please sign below to indicate your acceptance of this June 2014 Amendment.

 

 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Cowen   Group, Inc.
    


 

 

	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Jane Gerhard
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Jane   Gerhard
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Head   of Human Resources
    


 

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

 

	
Signed:
    	
/s/ Peter Cohen
    	
 
    	
June 2, 2014
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Peter   Cohen
    	
 
    	
Date
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10101 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. SCOTT MAT T HEW GOSS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 156

- 2

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Scott Mat t hew Goss pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, and the district court sentenced him to a below

- guidelines sentence of 144 months of imprisonment. On appeal, Goss argues that the district court’s finding that he

wa s accountable for over six kilograms of methamphetamine was erroneous. He also contends that the district court’s imposition of a two

- level firearm

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 18, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10101 Document: 00514802101 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2019No. 18

- 10101

2 enhancement to his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) was

erroneous and violated his due proce ss rights

. We review the district court’s determination of drug quantity for clear error and will affirm the finding as long as it is “plausible in light of the record as a whole.” United States v. Betancourt , 422 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir. 2005) (interna l quotation marks and citation omitted)

. Given that the district court’s drug

- quantity finding was based on sufficiently reliable evidence that Goss failed to rebut , he fails to show clear error

. See United States v. Harris , 702 F.3d 226, 230 (5th Cir. 2012); Betancourt , 422 F.3d at 246 ; s ee also United States v. Clark , 389 F.3d 141, 142 (5th Cir. 2004)

. We also review t he district court’s determination that Goss possessed a firearm for purposes of § 2D1.1(b)(1) for clear er ror. United States v. King , 773 F.3d 48, 52 (5th Cir. 2014). The Government submitted evidence at sentencing establishing that a “temporal and spatial relation existed between” a firearm, drug trafficking activity, and Goss. See United States v. Cisnero s - Gutierrez , 517 F.3d 751, 764

- 65 (5th Cir. 2008). Given that Goss failed to submit any competent rebuttal evidence, he cannot show that the district court’s application of the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement was clear error. See King , 773 F.3d at 52. Additio nally, we hold that Goss’s argument that the district court ’s imposition of the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement violated his due process rights has no merit. See United States v. Hebert , 813 F.3d 551, 564

- 65 (5th Cir. 2015) ; United States v. Andaverde

- Ti ñ oco , 7 41 F.3d 509, 525 (5th Cir. 2013)

. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10101 Document: 00514802101 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/18/2019
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E885]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    SALUTE TO THE GLENS FALLS ARMORY

                                 ______

                        HON. GERALD B.H. SOLOMON

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                          Monday, May 1, 1995
  Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, for 100 years, the Glens Falls Armory has 
been a conspicuous landmark on Warren Street and a source of pride for 
the people of this small city I call home.
  During those 100 years, units headquartered at the armory have served 
in both world wars. At the outbreak of World War I, Company K, 105th 
Infantry, 27th Division was activated from August 8, 1917, through 
April 1, 1919. In World War II, Company K of the 108th Infantry, 27th 
Division was activated from October 15, 1940, through December 31, 
1945.
  The armory was designed by the famous architect Isaac G. Perry, who 
helped design and construct the State Capital in Albany. The armory 
consists of 24,055 square feet, including a garage added in 1959.
  First opened in 1895 to house a company of the New York National 
Guard, the armory presently serves as headquarters for two NYNG units, 
the 646th Medical Company and Detachment 1, Company C, 3d Battalion, 
108th Infantry.
  That first unit, the 18th Separate Company, was also known as the 
Rockwell Corps or the Citizens Corp. And that, Mr. Speaker, reminds me 
why the armory is so special.
  It's a symbol of the citizen soldier who has fought in all our wars, 
from Concord and Lexington to the arid plains of Iraq.
  The backbone of our Armed Forces for 200 years has been the National 
Guard and Reserves, men and women from every walk of life who proudly 
devote several hours a month to the defense of their country.
  The response of this country to crises has always been speeded by the 
high state of readiness of our guardsmen and reservists. I can't tell 
you how proud I am of them.
  The men and women who serve in these units are all-around outstanding 
citizens, contributing to their communities in more ways than one. The 
armory itself has long been a focus of community life in the Glens 
Falls area.
  Mr. Speaker, on May 6, the scene will be the scene of a centennial 
celebration, complete with tours, displays, and speeches.
  I ask all Members to join me in a salute to the Glens Falls Armory 
and to all the patriotic Americans who have served there over the last 
100 years.

                          ____________________
```
#### LARRY B. FRANKLIN v. LEROY SIMON.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 ACC announces 24th and 25th NAF mergerPublished April 5, 2019
                        
                        
                        Air Combat Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS)–  --**
                Air Combat Command is merging 24th and 24th numbered Air Forces at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, this summer to better integrate cyber effects, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations, electronic warfare operations and information operations.
The synergy between cyber, ISR, EW and IO will increase unity of effort across these capabilities, resulting in new and improved options for combatant commanders. The integration also better aligns these units with priorities outlined in the 2018 National Defense Strategy and delivers the first “Information Warfare” NAF for the Air Force.
“The merger of 24th and 25th is the next step in leveraging and integrating new ideas and technologies to both improve the quality and speed of decision-making and deliver improved effects for commanders,” said Gen. Mike Holmes, ACC commander. “This formalizes the existing collaborations between cyber and ISR while expanding our competitive space in EW and IO, ultimately improving readiness and increasing lethality across the range of military operations – all vital to the success of multi-domain warfighting in the 21st century.”
The new IW NAF bolsters the Air Force’s ability to present electromagnetic spectrum forces and capabilities to execute missions alongside joint and interagency partners.
While the final organizational structure has not yet been determined, ACC anticipates an activation ceremony at JB San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, in late summer of 2019.JB Langley-Eustis 



Air Combat Command 



ACC 



24th Air Force 



25th Air Force 



Numbered Air Force 



NAF 



JB San Antonio-Lackland 



Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance 



ISR 



cyber 



electronic warfare 



Information Operations 



EW 



IO 



AFWN 



National Defense Strategy 



NDS 



Information Warfare 



IW