alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.24



 Exhibit 10.24 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE 

LICENSE AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE 04/15/2001 

BETWEEN 
 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 

AND 
 HISTOGENICS CORPORATION 

Effective as of May 1, 2009, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (“Stanford”), an institution of higher education
having powers under the laws of the State of California, and Histogenics Corporation a Delaware company having a primary place of business at 830 Winter Street, Waltham MA 02451, agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	BACKGROUND 

 Stanford and Histogenics are parties to a License Agreement effective
April 15, 2001 (“Original Agreement”) covering Restoration of Articular Cartilage Matrix disclosed in Stanford Docket S98-181. 

Stanford and Histogenics wish to amend the Original Agreement to change the date in section 2.6(A) ****. 

 

	 	2.	AMENDMENT 

 Section 2.6(A) of the Second Amendment dated January 15, 2006 shall
be amended as follows: 
 Replace the third bullet under Section 2.6(A) to read as follows: **** 

 

	 	3.	OTHER TERMS 

  

	 	3.1	All other terms of the Original Agreement, First and Second amendments remain in full force and effect. 

  

	 	3.2	The parties to this document agree that a copy of the original signature (including an electronic copy) may be used for any and all purposes for which the original signature may have been used. The parties further waive
any right to challenge the admissibility or authenticity of this 

 ****CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS
BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS
BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS. 








 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

 


	 	    	document in a court of law based solely on the absence of an original signature. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 in duplicate originals by their duly authorized officers or representatives. 
  

			
	THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
		
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Katharine Ku

	Name:	 	 Katharine Ku

	Title:	 	 Director Technology Licensing

	Date:	 	 May 8, 2009

	
	Histogenics Corporation
		
	Signature:	 	 /s/ F. Ken Andrew

	Name:	 	 F. Ken Andrew

	Title:	 	 CEO & President

	Date:	 	 May 6, 2009
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: December 14, 2007
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Theodore L. Koenig, certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Monroe Capital Corporation; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)

          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)

          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)

          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)

          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 4, 2016 /s/ Theodore L. KoenigTheodore L. KoenigChairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Monroe Capital Corporation
News United States Air Force
 Officials announce 2017 AFA Aerospace Award winnersPublished Sept. 26, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alexx Pons
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Association awards committee announced the final recipients of the 2017 National Aerospace and Specialty Awards. 
The AFA is an independent, nonprofit, civilian education organization that promotes understanding of aerospace power and the pivotal role it plays in the security of this nation.

This award program recognizes the most outstanding contribution to national defense in the fields of science and engineering relating to aerospace activity; flight in the atmosphere or space; arts and letters, covering a wide range of activities including writing, speaking, media relations, sculpting or painting; and for significantly exceeding standard performance.

***The specific category and respective winners are as follows:***
**
Theodore Von Karman Award (most outstanding performance in the field of science and engineering):  Capt. Eric J. Robinson, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.

David C. Schilling Award (most outstanding contribution to national defense in the field of manned flight):  492nd Fighter Squadron, RAF Lakenheath, England.

Gill Robb Wilson Award (most outstanding performance in the field of arts and letters): 1st Combat Camera Squadron, JB Charleston, South Carolina.

Citation of Honor (most outstanding contribution by an individual or organization to the development of aerospace power for the betterment of mankind): 17th Special Tactics Squadron, Fort Benning, Georgia; 75th Aircraft Maintenance Unit, Moody Air Force Base, Georgia; and the Information Exploitation Squadron, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.

The winners are authorized wear of the Air Force Recognition Ribbon.

Specific eligibility and application procedures are available via myPers. Select “any” from the dropdown menu and search “Aerospace.”

For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to **myPers**. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by**following these instructions**.AFA 



Aerospace Awards 



Karman 



Schilling 



Wilson 



Citation of Honor 



recognition 



AFPC
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5857]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  MEASURE READ THE SECOND TIME--S. 735

  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I understand there is a bill at the desk 
that is due to be read for a second time.
  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will read the bill for the 
second time.
  The bill was read for the second time.
  Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I object to any further proceedings on this 
matter at this time.
  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The bill will be placed on the calendar.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Annual Report of
Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hongyi Zhou, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 19, 2013 |                                            
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                     |                                            
|By:                  | /s/ Hongyi Zhou                            
|                     | Name: Hongyi Zhou                          
|                     | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### ABRAHAM S. EFFRON, M.D. v. ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0326]

                    Notice is hereby given that Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP, 1300 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern,                           ( print page 54662)                        has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730 of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730), Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest. Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP provided a debt/equity financing to National Trench Safety, LLC, 15955 West Hardy Road, Houston, TX 77060. The financing was made to support the growth and development of the company.                

The financing is brought within the purview of section 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Main Street Equity Interests, Inc. an Associate of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP, owns more than ten percent of National Trench Safety, LLC.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator of Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2010-22293 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Great Basin Scientific, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2015, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 27, 2016 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ryan Ashton        
|                    |  |     |  | Ryan Ashton            
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Three Decades of B-2 flight / Special Duty Tour Length Changes / GI Bill Benefits UpdatePublished July 19, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Greg Cerny
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this edition of Around the Air Force, Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, commemorates three decades of B-2 flight, Air Force releases changes to special duty tour length and announces GI Bill education benefits updates. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Greg Cerny) </iframe  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:- 30th anniversary of the B-2 Spirit's inaugural test flight- Air Force is reducing targeted special duty and instructor tour lengths- Changes to the Post-9/11 GI Bill will be taking effect January 2020ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



B-2 



434th Air Refueling Wing 



434th ARW 



AF 



AFRC 



AFWN 



Air Force Reserve Command 



air reserve base 



benefits 



changes 



Department of Defense 



DOD 



education 



families 



family members 



GI Bill 



Grissom ARB 



post 9/11 



Purple Heart 



USAF 



wounded warrior 



AETC 



Air Force instructor 



Keesler AFB 



MTI 



MTL 



PME instructor 



Second Air Force 



2nd Air Force 



special duty technical training instructors 



30th anniversary advancing avionics systems 



Air Force’s Global Strike Command 



Aircraft 



longest combat mission 



LR 



Missouri Air National Guard Unit 



National Defense 



Plane 



spirit 



Stealth Bomber 



stealth enterprise 



Whiteman Air Force Base
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LANCE ADRIAN COFFEY

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 107

- CR

Appeal from the

C ounty Criminal Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20150C07007 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until August 26 , 2017

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Mary Ann Marin

, Official Court Reporter for County Criminal

Court No. 1

, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before August 26 , 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of July , 2017

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox

, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Investors First-Staged Equity L.P. 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768834
<NAME> INVESTORS FIRST-STAGED EQUITY L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      816
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          48,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,458   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,710   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         43,149     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,859)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,710    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,333    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,501    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        89     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.41<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
#### Caldwell, Appellant, *v.*Maupin, d. b. a. Herley Athletic Club, Appellee.

(Decided January 23, 1939.)

*Mr. Lionel Levy,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Fraser, Effler, Shumaker & Winn,*for appellee.

Lloyd, J.

Walter ,S. Caldwell appeals to this court on questions of law from a judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas on the sustaining of a demurrer to his amended petition filed therein.

The facts as narrated in the amended petition, in so far as important, are that on November 25, 1937, Clifford C. Maupin, the appellee herein, defendant in the Court of Common Pleas, was engaged in promoting and exhibiting a wrestling match in the Civic Audito: rium in Toledo and that the wrestlers engaged therein were employed by appellee for that'purpose; “that for the purpose of exhibiting said wrestling match, defendant provided and maintained a so-called ‘ring’ in said auditorium, which ring was an elevated square platform with ropes attached to posts on the four corners thereof, and making the boundaries of said ‘ring’ within which boundaries said wrestling match was to be held”; that 'Caldwell, a spectator, “was sitting in a chair in the first row of seats in said auditorium while said wrestling match was in progress, and the two *162wrestlers in said ring employed by said defendant, and each wrestler weighing about two hundred pounds were wrestling when one of said wrestlers wantonly, wilfully, recklessly, carelessly and negligently threw the other wrestler over the ropes of said ring and onto the plaintiff, crushing him to the concrete floor of said auditorium,” as a direct result of which, and of the defendant failing to confine the wrestling match to the ring provided by him therefor, the appellant sustained certain alleged injuries for which he seeks to recover damages in the sum of $1500.

The facts- as alleged show the wrestlers to have been employees of appellee and to have been engaged in doing what they were employed to do at the time of the commission of the act complained of, and that injury to the appellant, who had a right to be where he was, was proximately caused thereby. What the evidence in support of these allegations may show is another question.

It is apparent that the appellee could not be guilty of all that is alleged. Wilfulness and wantonness are unlike, and neither is consistent with negligence and carelessness, which are synonymous terms. It is not essential to use any of these words to describe the cause of action. It is sufficient to state the .acts of commission and omission. The law applicable thereto will then determine whether a cause of action has been stated and the nature thereof.-

The amended petition states a-cause of action and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded thereto for further proceedings according to law.

*Judgment reversed and cause remanded.*

Carpenter and Overmyer,. JJ., concur.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Tech Report: Ground Based Radar Early Warning SystemPublished April 25, 2018
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – The U.S. Air Force maintains seven ground based early warning radar systems capable of detecting attacks and conducting general space surveillance and satellite tracking, located in seven separate locations around the globe, helping U.S. forces stand ready to respond in a moments notice.
Related links:
- Ballistic Missile Early Warning System
- PAVE PAWS Radar Systemspace 



surveillance 



Ready 



antenna 



globe 



targets 



signals 



U.S 



Ground Based Radar Early Warning System 



attacks 



satellite tracking 



locations 



Tech Report