alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-Q of H. F. Ahmanson & Company for the nine months ended
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                   <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     758,312
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           623,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              9,619,094
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   5,255,648
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     5,275,624
<LOANS>                                 31,854,104
<ALLOWANCE>                                398,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          50,588,224
<DEPOSITS>                              35,399,443
<SHORT-TERM>                             1,755,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                      1,460,265
<LONG-TERM>                              9,500,882
<COMMON>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                               2,472,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          50,588,224
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          1,700,934
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          929,147
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         2,630,081
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       1,137,181
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,695,289
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      934,792
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              115,626
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             284
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            954,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             38,298
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  38,298
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                54,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                2.64
<LOANS-NON>                                620,006
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           187,256
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            161,109
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           380,886
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              143,255
<RECOVERIES>                                30,323
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          398,290
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       398,290
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 US builds intermilitary relationship with RSAFPublished June 17, 2019
                        
                        
                        US Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs
                **SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFNS)  --**
                Royal Saudi Air Force F-15C Eagles fly in formation with U.S. Air Force F-15Cs in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, June 2, 2019. The flight was conducted as part of a larger effort to continue building military-to-military relationships and interoperability.U.S. Air Forces Central Command 



AFCENT 



intermilitary 



relationship 



Royal Saudi Air Force 



RSAF 



AF 



Air Force 



F-15 



Eagles 



LR 



KC-135 



Stratotanker Related Links
        U.S. builds intermilitary relationship with RSAF
            
            94th Airlift Wing: U.S. builds intermilitary relationship with RSAF
#### IN RE GOLD.

Patents.

This case is governed by the decision of the court in *Gold*v. *Gold*(3) ante, page 229.

No. 584.

Patent Appeals.

Submitted November 17, 1909.

Denied December 16, 1909.

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commisioner of Patents rejecting an application for the reissue of a patent.

*Affirmed.*

*240The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. Otto li. Barnett*for the appellant.

*Mr. Webster 8. Buchman*for the Commissioner of Patents.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Egbert H. Gold received patent No. 771,628, October 4th, 1904, for an adjustable low pressure heating system, on an application filed June 27th, 1904. On April 2d, 1906, he filed an application for reissue on the ground that the claims of the patent are insufficient to cover his invention broadly, owing to inadvertence and mistake, and partly to a misapprehension, at the time, of the true scope of the invention he had described. Before filing this application, namely on February 11, 1905, he had filed a new application for a patent for the same invention, that is sought in the reissue application. Edward E. Gold had filed an application for a patent for the same invention substantially, on July 16th, 1904, and an interference was declared between the two. The present application was prosecuted *ex parte*pending the interference proceeding between the others, and was ended by a final decision of the Commissioner rejecting the same on February 24, 1909. The reason given for rejection was that the invention was different from that disclosed in his patent. This appeal is from that final decision.

The interference case above mentioned was brought to an end on June 26, 1909, by a decision of the Commissioner awarding priority to Edward E. Gold. That case turned also on the question whether the patent application of Egbert H. Gold contained a disclosure of the invention of the issue. An appeal from that decision was also prosecuted by Egbert H. Gold, and is numbered 615 on the docket of this court. Both appeals, involving substantially the same question, were submitted together. We have affirmed the decision in No. 615, *241delivering an opinion in which the claims .in controversy are set ont in full. They need not be repeated here. Having held that the invention of that issue, which is the same as here claimed, was not disclosed in the patent application, it follows that the decision in this case must also be affirmed. It is so ordered, and the clerk will certify this decision to the Commissioner of Patents. *Affirmed.*

A petition for a rehearing was denied January 5, 1910.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                  CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES

                                 -------------

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                      (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                             Three Months       Six Months
                                            Ended June 30,    Ended June 30, 
                                           ---------------   ---------------
                                            1998     1997     1998     1997 
                                           ------   ------   ------   ------
Net Income (Loss)                          $  (36)  $   66   $  (32)  $  123   
Preferred Stock Dividends                      (5)      (5)      (9)      (9) 
                                           ------   ------   ------   ------
Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Shares  $  (41)  $   61   $  (41)  $  114
                                           ======   ======   ======   ======
Basic:
Average Common Shares Outstanding            93.7     93.4     93.7     93.4  
                                           ======   ======   ======   ======
Diluted:
Average Common Shares Outstanding            93.7     93.4     93.7     93.4   
Common Stock Equivalents - Options              -       .1        -       .1   
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock        9.6      9.6      9.6      9.6
                                           ------   ------   ------   ------
Diluted Average Common 
  Shares Outstanding                        103.3    103.1    103.3    103.1  
                                           ======   ======   ======   ======
Basic Earnings per Common Share            $ (.44)  $  .65   $ (.44)  $ 1.21  

Diluted Earnings per Share                 $ (.35)  $  .64   $ (.31)  $ 1.19
News United States Air Force
 Yokota AB Airman Earns Bronze Star DownrangePublished May 28, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Gabrielle Spalding
                        
                        
                        374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                Master Sgt. James Charles, 374th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron production superintendent, was presented the Bronze Star at Yokota Air Base, May 22, for his meritorious achievement as Maintenance Training Advisor in support of Operation Freedom’s Sentinel while at Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan.
“This isn’t a result of my actions, but those realized by the team of people I was lucky enough to be part of,” Charles said. “While in Afghanistan, I was fortunate enough to be assigned to an amazing team of diverse and talented folks.”
From Sept. 27, 2017 to Sept. 26, 2018, Charles was assigned to the 438th Air Expeditionary Wing. During this time, he operated outside of the coalition-controlled airfield, where he endured 19 indirect fire rocket attacks and was exposed to a persistent threat of insider attacks.
While facing these pressures, Charles led a team of Afghan maintenance personnel, dedicating over 900 hours advising on Afghan aircraft fleets located in Kandahar.
Additionally, he took control as the program manager for the Defense Language Institute’s English as a second language training program, successfully training 79 Afghan students, to include skill level upgrade of 48 Afghan maintainers.
His leadership and mentorship proved crucial, enabling the generation of tactical airlift and strike-capable aircraft for more than 1,800 combat sorties, over 2,300 casualty evacuations, the recovery of over 880 human remains and contributing to the sustainability and capability of a fleet with a combined value of over $249 million.
“It was a long year full of frustration and fulfillment,” Charles said. “Because of the team and our shared mission, I was able to walk away with an experience that opened my eyes as to why we’re still in Afghanistan and how we’re moving forward.”
Since after Dec. 6, 1941, men and women who served in any capacity in or with the U.S. military, have been awarded Bronze Star Medal; distinguishing themselves by their heroic or meritorious achievements or service. Charles is now amongst those brave men and women who have been recognized for their honorable contributions to the missions of the U.S. military.
“Receiving this decoration is both an honor and a privilege,” Charles said.AFWN 



Yokota AB 



Bronze Star Medal 



374th Airlift Wing 



374th AW 



374th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron 



374th AMXS 



374th Maintenance Group 



374th MXG 



438th Air Expeditionary Advisory Squadron 



438th AEAS 



442nd Air Expeditionary Squadron 



442nd AES 



738th Air Expeditionary Advisory Group 



738th AEAG 



INDO PACOM 



Maintenance Training Advisor 



Operation Freedom’s Sentinel 



PACAF 



Pacific Air Forces
#### Newton, Doing Business as Newton Gravel Company *v.*Hunt, Doing Business as Hunt Furniture Company.

[No. 18,951.

Filed May 28, 1957.]

Robert S. Webb, Irene T. Webb, and Paul G. Smith, all of Noblesville, for appellant.

(No appearance for appellee).

Cooper, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a complaint on account.

The appellee has not filed a brief in support of the judgment of the trial court. Both the Supreme Court of Indiana and our court have adopted a rule that the failure of an appellee to file a brief controverting the errors by the appellant, where the appellant’s brief makes a *prima facie*showing of reversible error, may be taken as a confession of such errors. In such cases, the judgment may accordingly be reversed and the cause remanded without prejudice to either pa,rty. This rule is not to be invoked nor has it been established for the benefit of the appellant, but for the protection of the court, and it has been repeatedly held that whether it is invoked is discretionary with the court. *Luns*
      *457
      *ford*v. *Maida*(1957) 127 Ind. App. 236, 140 N. E. 2d 762; *Associates Investment Co.*v. *Snyder*(1949) 119 Ind. App. 20, 83 N. E. 2d 622; *Miller*v. *Julian*(1904) 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588; *Meadows*v. *Hickman*(1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. 2d 343; *Huffman*v. *Huffman*(1947), 117 Ind. App. 601, 75 N. E. 2d 172; *Whallon*V. *Wood*(1948), 188 Ind. App. 163, 77 N. E. 2d 913; *Pittsburgh etc. R. Co.*v. *Linder*(1925), 195 Ind. 569, 145 N. E. 885; *Bryant*v. *School Town of Oakland City*(1930), 202 Ind. 254, 171 N. E. 378; 173 N. E. 268; *Reed, Admr.,*v. *Brown*(1939) 215 Ind. 417, 19 N. E. 2d 1015.

The appellant herein in support of its appeal from the judgment has filed a brief which, in our opinion, makes a prima facie showing of reversible error.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Note. — Reported in 142 N. E. 2d 643.
---

VIA EDGAR

|To: | United States Securities and Exchange
|--- | -------------------------------------
|    | Commission                           
|    |                                      
|Re: | Tahoe Resources Inc. (the Company) 
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F           
|    | Consent of
      Expert              

This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the Annual
Report). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things,
the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the
Annual Information Form).

I, Thomas Drielick, P.E. of M3 Engineering & Technical
Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, hereby consent to:

- the use of my name in connection with my involvement in the preparation of
  the technical report entitledEscobal Guatemala Project NI 43-101
  Preliminary Economic Assessmentissued on July 24, 2013 and dated
  effective May 7, 2012 (the Technical Report);
- references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual
  Information Form; and
- the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived
  from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Dated the 13thday of March, 2014

/s/ Thomas
DrielickThomas Drielick, P.E.

---
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









SERVICER CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-A Trust (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.




Date:                      June 27, 2013




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Wounded Warrior Trials postponed due to COVID-19Published March 13, 2020
                        
                        By Brian Anderson
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The seventh annual Air Force Wounded Warrior trials, set to begin March 20 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada was postponed March 12 due the COVID-19 public health threat.
The eight-day paralympic-style competition was scheduled for March 20-28 at facilities throughout the Las Vegas area. The competition, hosted by the Air Force Wounded Warrior Program, is designed to promote the mental and physical well-being of the wounded, ill and injured service members that make up the group and select the team that represents the U.S. Air Force at the 2020 Department of Defense Warrior Games and the 2020 Invictus Games.
Like many other large events that have been postponed or cancelled, the program’s leadership said they felt canceling the games was in the best interest of the people who could be put at risk of contracting the disease.
“We take the coronavirus outbreak very seriously and are confident that by making this difficult and important decision, the Air Force Wounded Warrior Program will continue to do our part to prevent the further spread of the infection while putting the safety and well-being of our warriors, caregivers, families and our staff first,” said Col. Michael Flatten, Air Force Wounded Warrior Program director.
The program offered advice for athletes, caregivers, family and staff planning to be a part of the care event. “If you were scheduled to attend, please do not travel. You will be notified regarding travel information,” Flatten said. Active duty service members were instructed to cancel their flights in the Defense Travel System. The Air Force Wounded Warrior Program staff will cancel all other DTS flights.
The Air Force Wounded Warrior Program is a congressionally mandated and federally funded organization administered by the Air Force’s Personnel Center in San Antonio. The adaptive-sports trials, made up of active duty, Air National Guard and Reserve and veterans, including their caregivers, is a competitive event that showcases the resiliency of wounded warriors and highlights the effectiveness of adaptive sports as part of their recovery.
While suspended, the trials are not over. The future of this year’s games will be decided based on the health and safety of its members, family and faculty.
“We will continue to monitor the situation and look to make a decision on a date and location for a future Air Force Trials in the coming months,” Flatten said.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



CONVID-19 



Air Force Wounded Warrior program 



AFW2 



AFPC 



resilience 



games 



warriors 



trials 



postponed 



sports 



recreation 



Air Force’s Personnel Center Related Links
        COVID-19 Resources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements in the Registrant's Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                 5,286
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         59,300
<ALLOWANCES>                           5,345
<INVENTORY>                           15,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      83,775
<PP&E>                               509,678
<DEPRECIATION>                       141,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       801,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 73,411
<BONDS>                              199,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 403
<OTHER-SE>                            17,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         801,094
<SALES>                              163,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     174,463
<CGS>                                 15,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         33,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     114,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    26,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (7,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                          (8,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                             302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.10


 


 





Certificate of Amendment


of

Certificate of Incorporation


of

Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.


 


Under Section 242 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law


 


Advanced Cell Technology,
Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”) hereby certifies
as follows:


 


1. The Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation is hereby amended by changing Article V, Section 1 so that, as amended, said Article V, Section 1 shall be and
read as follows:


 


	 	Section 1. Number of Authorized Shares. The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue shall be One Hundred Ten Million (110,000,000) shares. The Corporation shall be authorized to issue two classes of shares of stock, designated “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.”  The Corporation shall be authorized to issue Sixty Million (60,000,000) shares of Common Stock, each share to have a par value of $.001 per share, and Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, each share to have a par value of $.001 per share.


 


2. The foregoing amendment has been duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation law of the State of Delaware by the vote of
a majority of each class of outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon.