alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Pemco Aviation Group,
Inc. (the company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Ronald A. Aramini  
|                      |  |  |  | Ronald A. Aramini      
|                      |  |  |  | President and          
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Pemco Aviation Group, Inc. (the company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ John R. Lee        
|                      |  |  |  | John R. Lee            
|                      |  |  |  | Sr. Vice President and 
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Military Housing Privatization Initiative Tenant Bill of Rights signedPublished Feb. 27, 2020
                
                Secretary of Defense Dr. Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army Ryan D. McCarthy, Acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas B. Modly and Secretary of the Air Force Barbara M. Barrett signed the Military Housing Privatization Initiative Tenant Bill of Rights Feb. 25.
The Bill of Rights commits the Department of Defense to ensuring privatized housing tenants receive quality housing and fair treatment from the Military Housing Privatization Initiative project owners that operate and maintain privatized housing.
View the **Military Housing Privatization Initiative Tenant Bill of Rights here**.defense secretary 



housing privatization 



Tenant Bill of Rights 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Secretary of the Army 



acting secretary of the Navy
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. REGINO MIRANDA.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Amos Johnson v. Alfred Onsted.

*Divorce*— Support *of child*— Stability *of father.*

"Where a divorced -woman, to whom the care, management, and maintenance of a daughter was decreed, remarried, and her second husband took the child to his home and cared for it as his own, with full knowledge of the provisions of the decree, and never demanded pay of the first husband, who resided in the immediate neighborhood, for the keeping, or had any talk or agreement with him regarding the same, he cannot be held liable for such support, nor could the wife make any contract with her second husband which would bind its father for the child’s support without his consent. *Husband v. Husband,*67 Ind. 583.

Error to Lenawee. (Watts, J.)

Argued February 15, 1889.

Decided April 12, 1889.

*Assumpsit.*Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

The facts ■ are stated in the opinion.

*J. C. Winne,*for appellant.

*Seth*Bean, for defendant.

Sherwood, C. J.

In this case Ida B. Onsted was divorced from her husband, the defendant, on February 13, 1874, and by the decree she obtained was given the ■care, management, and maintenance of their child, a little girl then about three years old. Ida married the plaintiff in September, 1874 ,who immediately took her and the ■child to his home, and has cared for the child as he would his own ever since, with a full knowledge of the provisions of the decree between his wife and the defendant. It does not appear that in her suit for divorce .Mrs. Onsted either asked for or obtained any order for •cither temporary or permanent alimony. Mr. Onsted *438lives about four miles from the plaintiff. He never demanded the custody of this child; neither has plaintiff ever demanded any pay for keeping her, or ever had any talk or agreement with defendant regarding it, or about, her care or support. Under the foregoing facts the plaintiff brought suit in *assumpsit*against the defendant for the care, support, and maintenance of defendant's child while she lived in his family. The cause was tried in the Lenawee circuit, before Judge Watts, with a jury. At the close of the testimony the learned circuit judges directed a verdict for the defendant.

We think this direction was right, and the judgment, must be affirmed. There was no contract, either express, or implied, under the testimony given, made by the-defendant, under which he could be held liable for the child's support to the plaintiff; neither could the wife, under the facts stated, make any contract with the husband, Johnson, which would bind Onsted fór the child's support without his consent. *Husband v. Husband,*67 Ind. 583; Schouler, Dom. Rel. 322.

The other Justices concurred.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 66 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5602-S5603]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United 
[[Page S5603]] States submitting sundry nominations and two treaties 
which were referred to the appropriate committees.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E936]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     A TRIBUTE TO DR. JAMES WILLIS

                                 ______

                            HON. JERRY LEWIS

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 3, 1995
  Mr. LEWIS of California. Mr. Speaker, I would like to bring to your 
attention the fine work and outstanding public service of Dr. James 
Willis of Apple Valley, CA. Jim, a dedicated professional and longtime 
community activist, is retiring after a 33-year career in private 
dental practice.
  Jim began his career as a private practitioner in San Bernardino 
following his graduation from the University of Southern California 
School of Dentistry in 1962. After 5 years of success, he joined three 
other dentists in founding Wildwood Dental Group, one of the first 
group dental practices on the west coast. Working with his partners, 
Jim oversaw the general management of the practice and developed a 
national inventory tracking system which revolutionized the dental 
profession. He was also instrumental in establishing professional 
guidelines and the development of nationally recognized group practice 
standards. In 1979, Jim sold his group practice share and purchased a 
solo practice in Apple Valley.
  Complementing his professional success, Jim has also been actively 
involved in a number of civil and community-based organizations over 
the years. He is a member of the Tri-County Dental Society, the founder 
and co-chairman of its political action committee, and chairman of the 
public relations committee. Jim is also a founding member and former 3-
year president of the Inland Empire USC Trojan Club, a member of the 
San Bernardino Chamber of Commerce, and a former member of the Lions 
Club. Over the years, Jim has been extremely active in the Youth 
Baseball Program and has served as the volunteer director of the 
Redlands Assistant League for Children for whom he has provided needed 
dental care.
  Jim Willis and I have been friends most of our lives. As youths, we 
spent much time together with family but particularly I remember the 
summers at the local swimming pool and time at the YMCA. All of his 
contemporaries from San Bernardino High School watched with admiration 
as he returned from the Navy to San Bernardino Valley College and, 
after a short stay, went directly to dental school at USC. Now as he 
retires from dentistry we all watch with wonder as he contemplates his 
next career.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask that you join me, our colleagues, and Jim's many 
friends in recognizing his many fine achievements and selfless 
contributions. Jim's professionalism and dedication is deeply 
appreciated and greatly admired by those who know him. He has touched 
the lives of many people in southern California and it is only fitting 
that the House recognize Jim Willis upon his retirement.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      439
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (56)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,869
<PP&E>                                             891
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,689
<COMMON>                                        11,195
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,790)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,216
<SALES>                                            915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   915
<CGS>                                              911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (44)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,012)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,013)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Maxwell AFB opens for Hurricane Dorian supportPublished Sept. 3, 2019
                        
                        By Maj. Brian McGuire
                        
                        
                        Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                At the request of the Department of Homeland Security, through U.S. Northern Command, Maxwell Air Force Base opened Aug. 29 as an Incident Support Base in advance of Hurricane Dorian.
Personnel from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Defense Logistics Agency arrived Aug. 29 to begin preparations for receiving trailers of food, water and other necessary supplies FEMA may use after the hurricane passes.
“As we have for the last several hurricane seasons, the 42nd Air Base Wing and Maxwell Air Force Base are ready to support whole-of-government efforts to provide Americans emergency relief,” said Col. Patrick Carley, 42nd Air Base Wing commander. “While we don’t know what will happen when Dorian makes landfall, we can be ready to provide assistance.”
In addition to more than a hundred trailers currently on base, Maxwell AFB also received helicopters from Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida, that evacuated in advance of the storm.
“Maxwell (AFB) is a prime location to provide emergency relief support and a safe haven location during severe weather,” Carley said. “With increased activity and equipment on base, I ask that people stay away from the work sites out of safety concerns.”
Maxwell AFB has provided a staging location for supplies and response teams during Hurricanes Irma, Florence and Michael in 2017 and 2018 respectively. Several hundred more trailers are expected to arrive at Maxwell AFB before Dorian makes landfall in the United States.
“We hope that the storm isn’t as damaging as predicted, but we’re ready to support the staging and movement of relief supplies as part of FEMA’s effort,” Carley said.Hurricane Dorian 



Maxwell AFB 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force Hurricane Dorian 



Maxwell Air Force Base 



Department of Homeland Security 



incident support base 



Federal Emergency Management Agency 



U.S. Northern Command 



Defense Logistics Agency 



hurricane dorian update 



HURCON
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 21, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-198473) of Smart Trust,
Dynamic Sector Income Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


October 21, 2014
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: September 15, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ANTHONY DWIGHT YELVERTON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 434 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 31.2 

MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION 

I, Alexander W. Pease, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of CommScope Holding Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

| Dated: April 26, 2019  |
|------------------------|
| /s/ Alexander W. Pease |
|                   |
| Name:                  |   | Alexander W. Pease |
| Title:                 |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
EXHIBIT 4.2

**FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE**

                    FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE (this “Supplemental Indenture”), dated asof July 22, 2003, among BALLY TOTAL FITNESS HOLDING CORPORATION, a Delawarecorporation (as more fully defined below, the “Company”), theGUARANTORS (as more fully defined below, the “Guarantors”) listed onSchedule A hereto and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national bankingassociation, as trustee under the Indenture referred to below (the“Trustee”). 

**W I T N E S S E T H**

                    WHEREAS, the Company and the Guarantors have heretofore executed and deliveredto the Trustee an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated as of July 2,2003 providing for the issuance of an initial aggregate principal amount of$200,000,000 of 10-1/2% Senior Notes due 2011 (the “Initial Notes”);

                    WHEREAS, the Company and the Guarantors have authorized the issuance of (i) anadditional $35,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s Series A10-1/2% Senior Notes due 2011 (the “Additional Series A Notes”);(ii) an additional $35,000,000 aggregate principal amount of theCompany’s Series B 10-1/2% Senior Notes due 2011 to be issued in exchangefor the Additional Series A Notes if and when an Exchange Offer is consummated(the “Additional Exchange Notes,” and together with the AdditionalSeries A Notes, the “Additional Notes”) and (iii) the relatedguarantees by the Guarantors of the Additional Notes; 

                    WHEREAS, the Company desires to issue the Additional Series A Notes inaccordance with Section 3.1 and Article X of the Indenture and the AdditionalExchange Notes in accordance with Section 3.1 of the Indenture, and theGuarantors desire to guarantee the Additional Series A Notes and the AdditionalExchange Notes in accordance with Article XIII of the Indenture; 

                    WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.3 of the Indenture, the Trustee is authorized toexecute and deliver this Supplemental Indenture. 

                    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties heretodo hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows: 

                    1.   CAPITALIZED TERMS. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shallhave the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture. The term "Notes" shall havethe meaning set forth in the Indenture and shall include the Initial Notes, theAdditional Notes (as defined herein) and any other Additional Notes (as definedin the Indenture) that may be issued under the Indenture.

                    2.   ADDITIONAL NOTES.

          (a)   *Issuance of Additional Notes*. $35,000,000 aggregate principalamount of Additional Series A Notes shall be issued hereunder on the datehereof. The Additional
News United States Air Force
 Missile Security Operations Concept creates 341st Missile Security Operations SquadronPublished March 10, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Tristan Day
                        
                        
                        341st Missile Wing Public Affairs
                **MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. (AFNS) --**
                The 341st Security Forces Support Squadron adopted new mission sets over time since implementation of the Missile Security Operations Concept nearly three years ago and is now officially known as the 341st Missile Security Operations Squadron.In October 2017, Twentieth Air Force restructured how missile wing’s security forces groups operated, initiating the MSOC. This new objective created new squadrons and altered current ones.“The MSOC combined site and maintenance support functions of each Missile Security Forces Squadron into three separate squadrons working on rotating schedules, but doing the same tasks,” said Senior Master Sgt. Gregory Cotton, 341st MSOS security forces manager.Before MSOC was implemented, the 341st Security Support Squadron was a 70-person unit responsible for various support functions, which allowed the MSFS units to focus on operational matters.“Now, all the MSFS units do everything and we took on the tactical response force and convoy response force on top of maintaining our mission set of support,” said Maj. Tito Ruiz, 341st MSOS commander. “We took on more missions and ended up becoming more than just a support squadron. We became operational.”Originally, the TRF and CRF sections belonged to the 741st MSFS. By having the SSPTS take on these duties, all three were able to focus on the same thing altogether.“TRF and CRF have unique mission sets and were absorbed into the SSPTS unit, increasing SSPTS from a 70-person to 220-person unit, with the majority of the personnel now operationally-oriented in TRF and CRF,” Cotton said. “Transitioning to the MSOS name better suited the overall new unit.”With the 341st Missile Wing operating the largest missile complex in the Air Force, spanning 13,800 square miles, and the new mission bestowed upon the former support squadron, a name change was due.“The re-designating from the 341st SSPTS to 341st MSOS recognizes the operational importance of this squadron,” said Col. Frank Reyes, 341st Security Forces Group commander.“With the re-designation to MSOS, that name captures the essence of their operational mission, not just one of support,” he continued. “Since its inception, SSPTS served in the role of supporting, but in its new designation, on some days it’s the one supported.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Malmstrom AFB 



341st SSPTS 



revitalize squadrons 



MSOC 



missile security operations concept 



AFGSC 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



341st Missile Security Operations Squadron