alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 MacDill AFB awards contracts to small businessesPublished Jan. 27, 2020
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Shannon Bowman
                        
                        
                        6th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS)   --**
                The willingness to implement innovative thinking has kept the Air Force ahead of near-peer competitors for more than 70 years. Innovation is often driven by necessity. The Air Force often finds solutions to some of its challenges by partnering with and employing the ideas of small businesses.
Keeping with the innovation initiatives set by the Air Force, the 6th Contracting Squadron at MacDill Air Force Base hosted its second pitch-day event Jan. 22, in Tampa.
At MacDill AFB Pitch Day, small-business vendors presented proposals to help fulfill requirements, close capability gaps or provide potential technology advancements at the 6th Air Refueling Wing.
“We set up the pitch-day events to expedite the process of securing solutions to some of the difficulties we face at MacDill (AFB),” said Jace Anders, the 6th CONS flight chief. “We cut down on the time of the acquisition significantly because payments are made to small-business owners immediately, and in turn, we are able to obtain goods and services much faster.”
During the pitch day, MacDill AFB leadership selected proposals for signed contracts and received a 50% initial payment on the spot, with the remaining balance to be paid upon contract fulfillment.
Dan Rini, Rini Technologies president, was awarded a contract for his personal cooling system.
“It’s always exciting to get a contract award, but what’s most exciting about this process was the speed,” Rini said. “Usually these deals can take a year, but today, the deal was completed in under an hour.”
The 6th CONS has remained at the forefront of Air Force contracting, and has prioritized Air Force initiatives to bridge the gap for small businesses to enter the world of Department of Defense contract work.
According to the Air Force’s posture statement for fiscal year 2020, “We want to make partnering with the Air Force easy and energizing. We created a new mechanism to get dollars into the hands of small businesses faster than before.”
The pitch-day event resulted in $325,000 worth of contracts awarded to small-business owners.
“It is really important for the government to interact with small businesses,” Anders said. “We want to make sure that small-business owners get a fair opportunity to get on board with government acquisitions.”FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



MacDill Air Force Base 



innovation 



contract 



Contract Award 



small business 



Pitch Day 



6th Air Refueling Wing 



6th Contracting Squadron 



acquisition 



AMC 



Air Mobility Command 



contracting 



proposals
EXHIBIT 32.a
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Roderick M. Sherwood III

Roderick M. Sherwood IIIMay 17, 2010
 *
    
    This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7664

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN ANTHONY CAPERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CR-92-446, CA-98-2111-2-18)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Anthony Capers, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Anthony Capers seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §

5K2.0 (1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss this

appeal. We note that, because Capers’ motion did not challenge the

validity of his original sentence, the motion should not have been

docketed as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We therefore deny Capers’ motion for a certificate of

appealability as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 73 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6131]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Ogilvie, offered the following prayer:
  Let us pray:
  Almighty God, on this National Day of Prayer, we join with millions 
across our land in intercession and supplication to You, the Sovereign 
Lord of the United States of America. As we sound that sacred word 
Sovereign, we echo Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Lincoln along 
with other leaders through the years, in declaring that You are our 
ultimate ruler. We make a new commitment to be one Nation under You, 
God, and we place our trust in You.
  You have promised that if Your people will humble themselves, seek 
Your face and pray, You will answer and heal our land. Lord, as 
believers in You, we are Your people. You have called us to be salt in 
any bland neglect of our spiritual heritage and light in the darkness 
of what contradicts Your vision for our Nation. Give us courage to be 
accountable to You and Your Commandments. We repent for the pride, 
selfishness, and prejustice that often contradict Your justice and 
righteousness in our society.
  Lord of new beginnings, our Nation needs a great spiritual awakening. 
May this day of prayer be the beginning of that awakening with each of 
us in this Senate. We urgently ask that our honesty about the needs of 
our Nation and our humble confession of our spiritual hunger for You 
may sweep across this Nation. Hear the prayers of Your people and 
continue to bless America. In Your holy name. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
#### Stone *v.*Carlan and others.

*Ah*Appeal from an Aider granting an injunction, does nAtetay tie ópAratióá Af thii injunction; and if the defendant Violate it pénding thé appeSl, An attachment kill issue against him.

October, 1850.

An injunction was granted in this casé, restraining the defendants from using certain names and designations on their1 *739carriages. They appealed to the general term from the order of the justice granting the injunction, and pending the appeal, continued to use the prohibited names. An order was thereupon made, requiring them to show cause why an attachment should not issue.

*R. D. Holmes,*for the defendants,

*H. A. Mott,*for the plaintiff.

Paine, J.

The defendants claim that by their appeal proceedings are stayed, and that this suspends the effect of the injunction. This is an entire mistake. The sections of the code cited, (§ 334, 342 and 348,) do not apply to such appeals as this, which is from an order, not from a judgment; and on which no security is given. The injunction must be obeyed so long as it is in force, and as it appears to have been violated, an attachment must issue.
News United States Air Force
 ANG general to lead UPE Integration TeamPublished Sept. 4, 2018
                        
                        By Capt. Matthew Murphy
                        
                        
                        National Guard Bureau Public Affairs
                **PENTAGON (AFNS) --**
                What do unexplained physiological events and a recent promotion have in common? The answer is Edward Vaughan who recently promoted to brigadier general and was named to lead a UPE integration team. 
Previously, Vaughan served as the director for integration in the Office of Reserve Integration for the Secretary of Defense. He is also the former commander of the 156th Airlift Wing in Puerto Rico.
Vaughan’s new assignment is an example of Total Force Integration.
“The Air National Guard has a vast resource of leaders whose military and industry expertise can enhance problem solving and mission readiness for the Total Air Force as well as the joint force. We are proud to have Brig. Gen. Vaughan represent us in this venture,” said Maj. Gen. Marc Sasseville, Air National Guard deputy director.
Under Vaughan’s lead, the UPE Integration Team, will serve as Headquarters Air Force’s focal point for identifying solutions to optimize human performance in tactical and training aviation and eliminate or minimize the impact of UPEs.
UPEs sometimes manifest when aircrew experience symptoms that can result from a variety of factors, including loss of oxygen, headaches or disorientation. Potentially, these symptoms can hinder flight safety and effectiveness.
“This team can’t share information and data fast enough,” Vaughan said. “The Air Force and Navy, as well as our partners in other parts of government, academia, and industry, are working together to address this serious safety concern. While UPEs are as unique as the people that fly the planes, there are common elements among many of the events that our two services are working to solve.”
Historically, rates for UPEs are low. However, heightened awareness, and aging aircraft fleets, has increased aircrew reporting of in-flight physiologic symptoms. This drives aggressive response actions from the Air Force and joint partners to address these events and implement recommendations to make operations safer.Pentagon 



unexplained 



physiogical 



Events 



promotion 



UPE 



intergration 



team 



156th Airlift Wing 



156th AW 



total force 



Air National Guard 



ANG 



Joint Force 



Air Force 



AF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-522
In Re: JABARI ZAKIYA, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-170, CA-95-756-JFM) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jabari Zakiya, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jabari Zakiya has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this court directing the district court toorder preparation of a transcript of jury instructions in a criminal proceeding. We deny the petition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Zakiya has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Zakiya's application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
News United States Air Force
 AFCEC unveils 2018 Air Force Design Awards winnersPublished Oct. 26, 2018
                        
                        By AFIMSC Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force Civil Engineer Center has announced the winners of the 2018 Air Force Design Awards, recognizing eight innovative projects for excellence in design and efficiency.
“These award-winning projects exemplify the Air Force’s commitment to partnering with industry to deliver quality, mission ready facilities,” said Col. Scott Matthews, AFCEC Facility Engineering director. “These designers optimized and balanced functionality, cost-efficiency, sustainability and aesthetics.”
Two award levels were given this year: the Honor Award, which is the highest achievement, followed by the Merit Award.
This year’s recipients are:**2018 Honor Awards**
Facility Design: KC-46A Three-Bay General Maintenance Hangar, McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas
Facility Renovations and Additions: Foreign Materiel Exploitation Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio
Facility Design: Medical/Dental Clinic, Cannon AFB, New Mexico**2018 Merit Awards**
Facility Design: B-52 Squadron Operations/Aircraft Maintenance Unit Facility, Minot AFB, North Dakota
Facility Design: Craig R. McKinley Hall, Tennessee Air National Guard, McGhee-Tyson Air National Guard Base, Tennessee
Facility Renovations and Additions: F-22 Jet Engine Shop Renovation, Hawaii Air National Guard, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii
Facility Renovations and Additions: Historic Building 49 Renovation, Offutt AFB, Nebraska
Facility Design: Variable Height Tower, Eglin AFB, Florida
A 3-person juror team analyzed the design entries, compared them against the predetermined judging criteria, and selected for awards those projects that excelled in all aspects of the criteria, said David Duncan, AFCEC Senior Architect and Air Force Design Awards program manager.
“When assessing a project, we ask jurors to emphasize cost control, energy efficiency, functionality and sustainability,” Duncan said. “These outstanding designs set the bar high and help inspire future innovation, leading to continual design improvement and success.” Awards will be formally presented to the winners Nov. 14 during the AFCEC Design and Construction Partnering Symposium in San Antonio.KC-46A 



2018 Air Force Design Awards 



AFCEC Facility Engineering 



Foreign Materiel Exploitation Laboratory 



AFCEC Design and Construction Partnering Symposium 



Design Awards 



Air Force Design Awards 



design and construction 



facility 



military construction 



Air Force Civil Engineer Center
#### CURTIS T. BEDWELL & SONS, INC. v. ATLANTIC COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Executive Order 13552

# 2010 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1.** Parts II and IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in the Annex attached and made a part of this order.

**Sec. 2.** These amendments shall take effect 30 days from the date of this order.

(a)  Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the effective date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b)  Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceedings, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the effective date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial, or other action may proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if these amendments had not been prescribed.

Billing code 3195-W9-P

[FR Doc. 2010-22279

Billing code 5000-04-C
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00073-CR

HOLLY MICHELLE MESSICK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21F0879-005

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Holly Michelle Messick has filed an untimely notice of appeal from the trial court’s

judgment revoking her community supervision and sentencing her to two years’ incarceration for 

possession of a controlled substance. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence was imposed in this matter on September 19, 2022, and Messick did not file a 

motion for new trial. As a result, Messick’s notice of appeal was due on or before October 19, 

2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Messick did not file her notice of appeal until March 24,

2023, well past the deadline for filing such notice. Consequently, Messick’s attempt to appeal 

her revocation judgment in this matter was untimely. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has 

expressly held that, without a timely filed notice of appeal, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over 

an appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton v. 

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209 n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam).

By letter dated April 17, 2023, we notified Messick that her notice of appeal appeared to 

be untimely and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. We gave 

Messick twenty days to respond to our letter and to demonstrate how we have jurisdiction over 

the appeal notwithstanding the noted defect. Messick did not respond to our letter.

Because Messick did not timely file her notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want 

of jurisdiction.

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: May 15, 2023

Date Decided: May 16, 2023

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.2

Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Bankrate, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Barnhart, Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, (a) this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

|                |   |                                                                    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                                    |
| Date: June 19, 2015 |   | /s/ Steven D. Barnhart                                                  |
|                |   | Steven D. Barnhart

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

 

 

----
Name
   Registered Office and Agent
  Purpose and Business
  Capital Stock
 Classes and Number of Shares
 Powers and Rights of Common Stock and Class B Stock
 Voting Rights and Powers
 1




---



##### 



Dividends and Distributions
 Cash Dividends
 Other Dividends and Distributions
 2




---



##### 



Other Rights
 Transfer of Class B Stock
     3




---



##### 



Pledge of Class B Stock
 4




---



##### 



Certain Definitions
       Non-Permitted Transfers
 Automatic Conversion of Class B Stock
 5




---



##### 



Street or Nominee Registration of Class B Stock
 Conversion of Class B Stock
 6




---



##### 



Issuance of the Class B Stock
 a.
    
    Initial Issuance. The Board of Directors may authorize by resolution the manner
in which shares of the Class B Stock shall initially be issued and may set such terms
and conditions as it deems appropriate or advisable with respect thereto, without any
vote or other action by the stockholders, except as otherwise required by law.
Such initial issuance shall only be to the then holders of the Common Stock.
 Preferred Stock
 Issuance of the Common Stock and the Preferred Stock; Subsequent Issuance of Class B
Stock
 7




---



##### 



Cumulative Voting
 Adoption of Bylaws
  Shareholder Amendment of Bylaws
  Board of Directors
 8




---



##### 



Classification of Board of Directors
   Vacancies on Board of Directors
  9




---



##### 



Removal of Directors
  Stockholder Action
  Special Stockholder Meetings
  Location of Stockholder Meetings
 10




---



##### 



Amendments to Articles Fourth through Sixteenth
  Other Amendments
  Term of Existence
  Name and Address of Incorporator
 11




---



##### 



Liability of Directors
  th
 WESTWOOD ONE, INC.By:
    /s/ David HillmanName:
    David HillmanTitle:
    Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel     /s/ Melissa GarzaMelissa GarzaNotary Public   12