alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Aaron D. Peck,
Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Annual Report of Monroe Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 8, 2013



/s/ Aaron D. PeckAaron D. Peck Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)Monroe Capital Corporation
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: First
    Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian
    and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities
    Administrator.

    Dated:   March 5, 2012


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997, THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 9,565
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        405,781<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                          88,630
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     203,712
<PP&E>                                               626,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                       308,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       910,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                414,936
<BONDS>                                              376,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 125
<OTHER-SE>                                            13,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         910,213
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     330,487
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        214,786<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      18,194<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      47,565
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    22,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (12,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (12,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (12,980)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM INSTALLMENT
CONTRACTS RECEIVABLE LINES ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS NET OF UNEARNED FINANCE CHARGES.
<F2>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE FITNESS CENTER OPERATIONS LINE, THE
ADVERTISING LINE AND THE CHANGE IN DEFERRED MEMBERSHIP ORIGINATION COSTS
LINE ON THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
<F3>THIS AMOUNT IS THE MEMBER PROCESSING AND COLLECTION CENTERS LINE ON THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.15
 
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
    AMENDED MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
 For the three-month and six-month periods ended May 31, 2010
  Financial Overview
    Theratechnologies Inc.    




---



##### 



Revenues
   R&D Activities
  Selling and Market Development Expenses
  General and Administrative Expenses
  2




---



##### 



Net Financial Income
  Net Loss
  Quarterly Financial Information
   2010
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008 (1)Q2
    
    
    Q1
    
    
    Q4
    
    
    Q3
    
    
    Q2
    
    
    Q1amended
    
    
    amended
    
    
    amended
    
    
    amended
    
    
    amended
    
    
    amended
    
    
    Q4
    
    
    Q3Revenues
    
    $
    1,717
    
    
    $
    1,717
    
    
    $
    1,718
    
    
    $
    12,601
    
    
    $
    1,717
    
    
    $
    1,432
    
    
    $
    616
    
    
    $
    710Net (loss) earnings
    
    $
    (4,771
    )
    
    $
    (4,241
    )
    
    $
    (4,654
    )
    
    $
    5,779
    
    
    $
    (5,454
    )
    
    $
    (10,827
    )
    
    $
    (15,145
    )
    
    $
    (11,220
    )Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share
    
    $
    (0.08
    )
    
    $
    (0.07
    )
    
    $
    (0.08
    )
    
    $
    0.10
    
    
    $
    (0.09
    )
    
    $
    (0.18
    )
    
    $
    (0.26
    )
    
    $
    (0.19
    )
 
 (1)
    
    Theratechnologies adopted IFRS in fiscal 2010 with a transition date of
December 1, 2008. Consequently, the selected financial information for the year ended
November 30, 2008, as presented in our 2009 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which were
presented in conformity with Canadian GAAP, was not restated in accordance with IFRS and
accordingly, is not comparable with the information for fiscal 2010 and 2009.  Financial Position
   Subsequent events
  3




---



##### 



Transition to IFRS
    (i)
    
    Share-based payment transaction exemption:The Company has elected to apply the share-based payment exemption. It applied IFRS 2 from
December 1, 2008 to those stock options that were issued after November 7, 2002 but that had
not vested by December 1, 2008. The application of the exemption is detailed below.(ii)
    
    Designation of financial assets and financial liabilities exemption:The Company elected to re-designate cash from the held for trading category to loans and
receivables.
    Outstanding Share Data
  Contractual Obligations
  Economic and Industry Factors
  Forward-Looking Information
  4




---



##### 



5
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elmer's  Restaurants,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  January 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Dennis
R. Miller, Secretary and Corporate Controller of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Elmer's  Restaurants,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Elmer's
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ DENNIS R. MILLER
----------------------------------
Dennis R. Miller
Secretary and Corporate Controller
February 22, 2005
Opinion issued March 26, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00851-CV

———————————

ALEX EDUARDO LECHIN, Appellant

V.

CARMEN MONTIEL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-68138

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Alex Eduardo Lechin, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041; Fees Charged in the 

Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial 
2

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). 

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing 

the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified on November 

25, 2019 and January 9, 2020 that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did 

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and 

for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: March 20Published March 20, 2018
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Marqus Williams
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson testifies before the U.S. House of Representatives about the fiscal year 2019 budget and Air Forces Central Command hosts an innovation summit. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Marqus Williams. 
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
 Related links:
- **National Defense Strategy drives Air Force budget**
- **AFCENT Innovation Summit fuels thoughtful debate on future Air Force and DOD operations**ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



A1C MarqusWilliams 



Heather Wilson 



SecAF 



House of Representatives 



Air Forces CentralCommand 



innovation summit 



budget 



Qatar
Exhibit 10.1

DESCRIPTION OF DMITRI KAPSAMUN VERBAL AGREEMENT WITH ALLAZIO ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

Dmitri Kapsamun, the sole officer and director of Allazio Entertainment Corp.
(the "Company") has verbally agreed to loan the Company funds necessary to
complete the registration process on Form S-1. The loan is unsecured and does
not bear interest nor have a maturity date or a repayment provision or other
terms and conditions.


/s/ Dmitri Kapsamun
-----------------------------
Dmitri Kapsamun
EXHIBIT 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Claude Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Skanderbeg,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:	March 26, 2015

| | /s/ Brian Skanderbeg
| | --------------------
| | Name:               
| | Title:
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK V. KENNEDY.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS CHASMER.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002






I,
      Leslie
      I. Handler, President of Encompass Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      March 14, 2007




/s/
      LESLIE I. HANDLER


Leslie
      I.
      Handler


President
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARY JO RUSSILLO.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANIES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 21, 1985

Decided November 14, 1985.

*25*James T. O’Halloran*argued the cause for appellant *{Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld,*attorneys; *William L’E. Wertheimer,*of counsel).

*Lawrence D. Smith*argued the cause for respondent *{Hein, Smith & Berezin,*attorneys).

*26PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 194 *N.J.Super.*69, is reversed and the judgment of the trial court reinstated substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Brody, reported at 194 *N.J.Super.*80.

*For reversal*— Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

*For affirmance*— None.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# USecAF talks modernization during aviation week symposium 

              - Published  Oct. 25, 2017
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Rusty Frank                                                    
              - Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

**WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --  **
Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan discussed the importance of rapid modernization and innovation during the 2017 Aviation Week Program Excellence Symposium in Washington, D.C., Oct. 23, 2017.

“The range of global threats we face calls for a far more innovative, dynamic and cost-effective Department of Defense,” Donovan said. “Speed is one of the most important attributes of a system designed to win. That is certainly true with air power.” 

When it comes to innovation, the Air Force is looking for new ways to do business, accelerating the transfer of ideas from the lab to the field, and putting the latest capabilities in Airmen’s toolkits as quickly as possible. 

“We must get faster in developing counter-options, at achieving a common operating picture of the battle space, networking it altogether and achieving overwhelming decision speed,” he said.

Donovan warned that America’s potential adversaries are gaining ground, investing in capabilities and innovating at a much faster pace than before. In order to stop their efforts the Air Force is looking at government and industry programs for new ideas. 

“Our ability to adapt and respond faster than our potential adversaries is the greatest challenge we face,” Donovan said to the audience of programmers and engineers. “We need your assistance — your partnership, ideas and innovation. It is going to take our combined efforts and partnerships to build a more lethal force with the inherent flexibility and responsiveness our Nation needs to maintain our competitive edge.”

USecAFinnovationSecAFSAFAviation Weekcomputerspublic partnershipsAir ForceMcLeanmodernization
Order filed April 30, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01031-CV

____________

ARSENIO CANTU, Appellant

V.

VERONICA PENA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1017967

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due April 22, 2013. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant submits a brief to the clerk of this court on or before May 

30, 2013, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
### NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1418 HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. IMMUNEX CORPORATION and AMGEN, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 07- CV-780, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

2009-1182 HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. GENENTECH, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08- CV-166, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

ON MOTION Before NEWMAN Circuit Judge. ORDERGenentech Inc. moves the court to treat appeal nos. 2008-1418 and 2009-1182

as companion cases. Genetech states that Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and Immunex Corporation et al. consent. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The above-captioned appeals will be treated as companion cases, i.e., the cases will be briefed separately and submitted to the same merits panel. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear these cases. FOR THE COURT 

# MAR 0 62009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Robert M. Galvin, Esq. Richard L. DeLucia, Esq. James Galbraith, Esq. Vernon Michael Winters, Esq. s17 MAR 0 6 2009 All nth-16W CLERK

2008-1418, 2009-1182 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         435,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               706,836
<PP&E>                                       7,930,733
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,056,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,753,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,399,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,753,200
<SALES>                                        345,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               359,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               345,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.17
        	

</TABLE>