alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,709                  13,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,463                 202,463
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             63,156                  63,156
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            8,458                   8,458
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             98,803                  98,803
<PP&E>                                          15,816                  15,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 568,584                 568,584
<SHORT-TERM>                                    21,346                  21,346
<PAYABLES>                                     299,680                 299,680
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    54,833                  54,833
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              57,744                  57,744
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,663                  27,663
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,377                   1,377
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,835                  72,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   568,584                 568,584
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                1,871                   3,910
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             8,346                  16,808
<COMMISSIONS>                                   39,726                  74,043
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,197                   2,936
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    2,245                   4,390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,204                  10,761
<COMPENSATION>                                  33,365                  61,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,756                   8,928
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,756                   5,268
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,807                   4,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46                    0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40                    0.70
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          55,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,374,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    242,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,401,000
<PP&E>                                       5,311,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,059,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,704,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,552,000
<BONDS>                                      1,150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,000
<COMMON>                                       169,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,415,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,704,000
<SALES>                                      5,153,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,153,000
<CGS>                                        4,385,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,385,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (218,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (218,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (218,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
**DM** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0286 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LOGAN RAY GARDNER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including July 4 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 28 2021

05/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0286
Exhibit
      23.1








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      have
      issued our report dated January 26, 2005 accompanying the balance sheet of
      Invisa, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements
      of
      operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended
      contained in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, which report contains
      an
      explanatory paragraph relating to certain significant risks and uncertainties
      which conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue
      as a going concern. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the
      Registration Statement and Prospectus.











/s/
      Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.











Tampa,
      Florida


January
      26, 2006
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS








We hereby consent to the use by SandRidge Permian Trust (the "Trust") of our name and to the inclusion of information taken from the reports listed below in the Trust's Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the year ended December 31, 201 8 , filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on or about March 14 , 201 9 :





December 31, 201 8 , SandRidge Permian Trust Interest in Certain Properties located in Texas – SEC Price Case





December 31, 201 7 , SandRidge Permian Trust Interest in Certain Properties located in Texas – SEC Price Case





December 31, 201 6 , SandRidge Permian Trust Interest in Certain Properties located in Texas – SEC Price Case








NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.





By:  /s/ C.H. (Scott) Rees III


C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer








Dallas, Texas





March 14 , 201 9











Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients.  The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI.  The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the original document.  In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM'S WORK IN OKLAHOMA CITY

  Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I rise today to praise the members of 
the Montgomery County Maryland Search and Rescue Team for their work in 
Oklahoma City. This team worked among the death and destruction of 
Oklahoma City, driven by the hope that they would find another survivor 
within the tons of debris of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.
  I cannot stress the gratitude that I feel as the Senator for Maryland 
to this group of dedicated heros, who worked 12 hours a day, for days 
on end, in their search for survivors. This group concentrated on 
search and rescue, ignoring the danger of falling debris and the mental 
agony of this tragedy.
  Mr. President, I feel the dedication this team and others like it 
displayed in Oklahoma City exemplifies the American spirit, a spirit of 
helping those in need to overcome a crisis. The brave men and women of 
the Montgomery County Search and Rescue Team placed their lives on the 
line for their fellow Americans; this is nothing less than an act of 
heroism.
  The Montgomery County team worked at the center of the blast zone of 
the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building by shoring up and removing giant 
slabs of concrete as members of the Oklahoma City Fire Department 
removed bodies. Working at the center of the blast zone, at ground 
zero, was dangerous duty. I know that I speak for all of my colleagues 
as I recognize this Montgomery County team because they were an example 
of the many dedicated Americans who came from all across the Nation to 
lend a helping hand in the wake of this disaster.
  Mr. President, I conclude my remarks today by passing along to the 
Montgomery County Search and Rescue Team a much deserved thank you for 
a job well done. Thank you for restoring the notion that the American 
spirit is still alive and well. Mr. President, I yield the floor.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date:  January 16, 2013/s/ Andrew J. KandalepasName:  Andrew J. KandalepasTitle: Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and DirectorPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
JUNE 30, 1998 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000770949
<NAME> REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         143,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  591,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,014
<INVENTORY>                                    596,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,423,194
<PP&E>                                         369,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,711,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          566,229
<BONDS>                                        635,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           932
<OTHER-SE>                                     492,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,711,662
<SALES>                                      1,640,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,635,104
<CGS>                                        1,046,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,046,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               557,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL PORCELLO.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 F-16 crashes near Spangdahlem AB, pilot OKPublished Oct. 8, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Reports
                        
                        
                        52nd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon crashed Oct. 8 at about 3 p.m. CEST, near Zemmer, Germany, during a routine training sortie.
The pilot ejected safely and has been recovered with minor injuries. The aircraft is assigned to the 480th Fighter Squadron, 52nd Fighter Wing, Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany.
First responders are responding to the incident at this time.
A board of officers will investigate the crash. Additional details will be provided as they become available. The cause of the crash is under investigation.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Spangdahlem AB 



f-16 



Fighting Falcon 



crash 



pilot 



USAFE 



training 



ejection
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 17, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-61069 Summary Calendar

AMADOU BAMBA CISSE Petitioner

v. JOHN ASHCROFT, US ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72-415-208

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Amadou Bamba Cisse, a native and citizen of Senegal, has petitioned for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing without opinion his appeal from the decision of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying Cisse’s application for asylum and for withholding of deportation. Cisse contends that the BIA’s summary affirmance procedures do not provide a basis for judicial review. This issue is foreclosed by Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 832-33 (5th Cir. 2003).No. 02-61069 -2- Cisse contends that his asylum application should have been granted. He argues that his fear of persecution was reasonable because he had opposed the Senegalese government and because the government knew of his opposition. Because the BIA adopted the IJ’s decision without opinion, this court must review the IJ’s decision. Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). This court will uphold the IJ’s determination that Cisse is not eligible for asylum if it is supported by substantial evidence. Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft , 303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002). The substantial evidence standard requires only that the IJ’s “conclusion be based upon the evidence presented and be substantially reasonable.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). To reverse the IJ’s determination that Cisse is not eligible for asylum, “the evidence must compel a reasonable fact-finder to conclude that [he] suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution because of a protected ground.” Girma v. INS , 283 F.3d 664, 669 (5th Cir. 2002). The BIA has the discretion to determine whether the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a grant of asylum in a particular case. See id. ; see also 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1). After careful review of the briefs and the administrative record, we conclude that the IJ’s finding that Cisse’s testimony was not credible because of inconsistencies between Cisse’s two asylum applications is supported by substantial evidence. The IJ’s conclusion that Cisse had failed to make an adequate showingNo. 02-61069 -3- of past persecution and of fear of future persecution is also supported by substantial evidence. Cisse contends that the BIA should not have cut three months from the voluntary departure period. This court lacks jurisdiction to review claims for discretionary relief, including claims regarding voluntary departure. Eyoum v. INS , 125 F.3d 889, 891 (5th Cir. 1997).
PETITION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Reagent Resource Support Program 
for AIDS Vaccine Development.
    Date: October 12, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
3147, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jane K. Battles, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2744, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8f8c999981889e878cad808c8481c3838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6a4a7b2b2aaa3b5aca786aba7afaae8a8afaee8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 2, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-22533 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>