Abatement Order filed November 21, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00350

- CR

____________ JASON RAY BOUCHARD , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1374815

ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Ted Doebbler. On October 30, 2013, time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no motion for
extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).
Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) the judge of the 178th District Court shall (1) immediately conduct a hearing, at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, and state’s counsel shall participate, eit her in personor by video teleconference, to determine (a) whether appellant desires to prosecute

his appeal; (b) whether appellant is indigent; (c) if not indigent, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal or whether appellant has failed to make necessa ry arrangements for filing a brief; (d) the reason for the failure to file a brief; (e) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when appellant’s brief will be filed; and (2) prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the h earing. If appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a transcribed record of the hearing, a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video teleconference, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstat ed on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its ow n motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the tr ial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAMR ULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief.
(b) Criminal Cases

. (1) Effect. An appellant = s failure to timely file a brief d oes not authorize either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration of the appeal without briefs.

(2) Notice

. If the appellant = s brief is not timely filed, the appellate clerk must notify counsel for the parties and the trial cou rt of that fact. If the appellate court does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court must order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appella nt is indigent, or, if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations.

(3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any necessary hearings, make appropriate findin gs and recommendations, and have a record of the proceedings prepared, which record

C including any order and findings

C must be sent to the appellate court.

(4) Appellate Court Action

. Based on the trial court = s record, the appellate court may act appropriat ely to ensure that the appellant = s rights are protected, including initiating contempt proceedings against appellant = s counsel. If the trial court has found that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, or that the appellant is not indigent but has not made the necessaryarrangements for filing a brief, the appellate court may consider the appeal without

briefs, as justice may require.