alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    CALCULATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<S>                          <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>
                              THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,     SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  1997        1996               1997           1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income                    $     74      $ 4,772           $    302        $  7,393
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding     40,298       41,332             40,560          41,317

Adjustments necessary to
  reflect weighted average
  number of common shares
  outstanding on a fully
  diluted basis                  2,030          730               1,202            674
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                42,328       42,303              41,762         42,231
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fully diluted earnings
  per share                    $  0.00      $  0.11             $  0.01        $  0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), I, William J. Restrepo, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 20, 2013



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ William J. Restrepo
|Name:  |  | William J. Restrepo    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
v390807_ex10-28 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


Exhibit 10.28




PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN
OMITTED AND ARE BEING FILED SEPARATELY

WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IN A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

REQUEST UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.

THE SYMBOL “[***]” IN THIS EXHIBIT INDICATES THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED.
#### Carpenter *v.*Spooner.

This court will not sanction any attempt by fraud or misrepresentation, to bring a party within its jurisdiction.

Where a party having been induced by a false statement, to come within the jurisdiction of the court, for the purpose, was then served with a summons and complaint in an action in this court, the service was, on motion, set aside.

May 25, 1850.

Appeal from an order made at chambers, setting aside the service of a summons, with costs. The facts appear in the decision.

*A. Crist,*for the plaintiff.

*Spooner,*for the defendant.

By the Court.

This was an action for libel. Both parties reside in Brooklyn, and out of the jurisdiction of this court. The plaintiff, however, was desirous of having the cause tried in this court. In order to bring the cause within its jurisdiction, it was necessary that the summons should be served within this city. A clerk of the plaintiff’s attorney, therefore, procured a person to write to the defendant, requesting him to call on the writer next day, in this city. The defendant came, in order to comply with the request in the letter, and when he was leaving the ferry boat, was met by the person who had written the letter, and was then served with the summons in this action. The whole proceeding was a trick, for the purpose of giving this court jurisdiction.

The excuse alleged by the plaintiff is, that he had been so libelled by the defendant and others in Brooklyn, as to raise the public feeling there against him, and he could not hope for a fair trial in the County of Kings. If so, there is a sufficient remedy by moving the supreme court; and we have no doubt, it will, on application, be properly applied. An application was made to set aside the service of this summons, and we *718think it was' well founded. This court will not sanction anj attempt to bring a party within its jurisdiction by fraud anG misrepresentation. And where by a false statement or frauda-lent pretence, a party is brought within the jurisdiction, and. there served with process, the service will be set aside. We recollect a case where a party was entrapped into this state out' of another state, and then served with process, and there the service was set aside.

If a party who is not within the jurisdiction voluntarily come within it, he thereby becomes amenable to the process of the court, but not unless he comes voluntarily. The court will not countenance any proceeding of the nature adopted in this case.

Appeal dismissed with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6606
DAVID H. SUTTLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus M. HUGHES; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-29-MU) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David H. Suttle, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Suttle v. Hughes , No. CA-95-29-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit23.2**

** **

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Amendment no. 2 to Registration Statement Form S-3 (file No. 333-188007)and appearing on Form 8K/A (amendment #1) of our reports dated March 7, 2014, except for Note 1, Note 2, Note 3, Note 9, Note13 and Note 23, as to which the date is November 10, 2014, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, comprehensiveincome, stockholders equity and cash flows of Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. as of December 31, 2013.

 

/s/UHY VOCATION HK CPA LIMITED

 

HongKong, the People’s Republic of China

October 6, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1998
<CASH>                                           1,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                       124
<INVENTORY>                                     25,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,497
<PP&E>                                          86,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,665
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,059
<SALES>                                         31,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,310
<CGS>                                           17,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2782 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to improve the Federal charter 

for the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Mr. SANDERS (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to improve the 

Federal charter for the Veterans of Foreign Wars of 

the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO FEDERAL CHARTER OF 

4 VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS. 

5 (a) FEDERAL CHARTER.—Section 230101(a) of title 

6 36, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘men’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘veterans’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2782 IS

1 (b) PURPOSES.—Section 230102(3) of such title is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘widows’’ and inserting ‘‘surviving 

3 spouses’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Allen *v.*Johnson.

On an appeal from an order made by a justice at chambers, it is not necessary to execute an undertaking under the code of procedure.

January 20, 1849.

On an appeal from an order made by one of the justices at chambers, the respondent insisted that the appeal was irregular and should be dismissed, because no undertaking had been filed. The order appealed from, struck out parts of the answer in the cause, as redundant and immaterial.

*630
      *N. B. Blunt,*for the respondent.

*L. R. Marsh,*for the appellant.

By the Court.

If it be necessary in appeals under the 299th section of the code of procedure, to give the security prescribed on appeals from judgments, it is quite apparent that it will be extremely inconvenient, and greatly embarrass the business of the court. The orders made by a justice at chambers, are often necessarily made without much discussion or time for deliberation, and we have been in the habit of reviewing them very freely before the whole court.

We have come to the conclusion, on examining the code, that it is not necessary to give security on such appeals. The section says these appeals may be taken *“ in like manner'''*as those from final judgments. This language has full effect, if we apply it to the appeal itself, as distinguished from giving the security. The section regulating appeals from judgments, (s 297,) plainly recognises this distinction. *So*the 275th section declares how appeals in general shall be made, and the giving of security is no part of the requisition. That is required in certain classes of appeals, by distinct sections.

We think there is no occasion for extending the giving of security to appeals from orders made by a single justice, and that a true interpretation of the code does not require it.
Opinion issued March 26 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 19 - 00851 - CV

——————————— ALEX EDUARDO LECHIN , Appella nt

V. CARMEN MONTIEL , Appell e e On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2017 - 68138

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Alex Eduardo Lechin , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041; Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial2

Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made ar rangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). After being notified on November 25, 2019 and January 9, 2020 that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
**Exhibit 99.12**

**LETTER OF CONSENT**

Reference is made to the technical report dated December 6, 2013with an effective date of October 23, 2013, entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Pre-Feasibility of the Strange Lake Property, Quebec, Canada”(the “**Technical Report**”) which the undersigned has prepared in part for Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. (the “**Corporation**”). 

I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and the extracts from, or summaries of, the Technical Report, in the Corporation’s Annual Information Form datedJanuary 24, 2014 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, which is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F, including all exhibits, of the Corporation, which is being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission. 

Yours very truly, 

*(signed) Ian Hutchison*

Ian Hutchison, Ph.D., P.Eng 

Director 

SLR International Corporation

Dated: January 29, 2014
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Development Capital Group, Inc.., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andriy Korobkin, the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2.                          | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 6, 2012         |                                                                                                                                                     
|                            |                                                                                                                                                     
|/s/                         |                                                                                                                                                     
|Andriy Korobkin             |                                                                                                                                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and |                                                                                                                                                     
|                            |
**E****XHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification by CEO and CFO  pursuant to Section 1350, as adapted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with Grupo Supervielle S.A.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”) solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adapted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Patricio Supervielle, the Chief Executive Officer and Alejandra Naughton, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Supervielle S.A. each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.             the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grupo Supervielle S.A.

 

 
|                      | By:    | /s/   Patricio Supervielle |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                      |   | Name:                      | Patricio Supervielle |
|                      |   | Title:                     | Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   |                       |   |
|                      |   |                       |   |
|                      | By:    | /s/ Alejandra Naughton     |
|                      |   | Name:                      | Alejandra Naughton |
|                      |   | Title:                     | Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |   |                       |   |
| Date: May 1st, 2017. |   |                       |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                       364
<INVENTORY>                                     21,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,201
<PP&E>                                           5,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,111
<SALES>                                         22,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,866
<CGS>                                           15,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1




AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION
 ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE
 SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND
 ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB
 
 
 I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance Officer of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of February 24, 2011 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as successor to American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2011-1 Owner Trust, as follows:
 
 (i)
A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2011, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.
  (ii)
To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14thday of June, 2011.
 
 
 /s/ Paul C. Honda
 Paul C. Honda
 Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and Compliance Officer
 (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)