Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 174 / Thursday, September 9, 2010 / Notices 54911 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled In Re Certain Ground Fault 

Circuit Interrupters and Products 

Containing Same DN 2754; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the 

Commission, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. The public version of the 

complaint can be accessed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

filed on behalf of Leviton Manufacturing 

Co., Inc. on September 3, 2010. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1337) in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain ground fault 

circuit interrupters and products 

containing same. The complaint names 

as respondents Fujian Hongan Electric 

Co., Ltd. of Fujian 355106, China; 

General Protecht Group, Inc. of 

Zhejiangm 325604, China; Shanghai 

ELE Manufacturing Corporation of 

Shanghai 201703, China; Zhejiang 

Trimone Co. Ltd. of Zhejiang 314200, 

China; Zhejiang Easting House Electric 

Co. of Zhejiang 314100, China; Frontier 

Lighting, Inc. of Clearwater, FL; The 

Designers Edge, Inc. of Bellevue, WA; 

Orbit Industries, Inc. of Los Angeles, 

CA; Ready Wholesale Electric and 

Lighting, Inc., d/b/a Ready Wholesale 

Electric Supply of Reseda, CA; 

Sutherland Lumber Company of Kansas 

City, LLC, d/b/a Sutherlands of Kansas 

City, MO; W. E. Aubuchon Co., Inc., 

d/b/a Aubuchon Hardware of 

Westminister, MA; Westside Wholesale 

Electric & Lighting, Inc., Westside 

Electric Wholesale, Inc. and Westside 

Wholesale, Inc. of Los Angeles, CA and/ 

or Bell, CA; Contractor Lighting & 

Supply, Inc. of Columbus, OH; Interline 

Brands, Inc., d/b/a Lighting of Pompano 

Beach, FL; Royal Pacific Ltd. of 

Albuquerque, NM; Littman Bros. Energy 

Supplies, Inc. of Schaumburg, IL; 

Norcross Electric Supply Company of 

Duluth, GA; Menard, Inc. of Eau Claire, 

WI; Garvin Industries, Inc. of Franklin 

Park, IL; Central Purchasing, LLC of 

Camarillo, CA; Harbor Freight Tools 

USA, Inc. of Camarillo, CA; WarehouseLighting.com LLC of Muskego, WI; 

SecurElectric Corporation of Atlanta, 

GA; G–Techt Global Corporation of 

Atlanta, GA; Deerso, Inc. of Cape Coral, 

FL; New Aspen Devices Corporation of 

Brooklyn, NY; American Ace Supply 

Inc. of San Francisco, CA; Safety Plus 

Products, Inc. of McFarland, WI; Ingram 

Products, Inc. of Jacksonville, FL; and 

American Electric Depot, Inc. of Fresh 

Meadows, NY. 

The complainant, proposed 

respondents, other interested parties, 

and members of the public are invited 

to file comments, not to exceed five 

pages in length, on any public interest 

issues raised by the complaint. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of an exclusion order and/or a 

cease and desist order in this 

investigation would negatively affect the 

public health and welfare in the United 

States, competitive conditions in the 

United States economy, the production 

of like or directly competitive articles in 

the United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the orders are used 

in the United States; 

(ii) Identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the potential orders; 

(iii) Indicate the extent to which like 

or directly competitive articles are 

produced in the United States or are 

otherwise available in the United States, 

with respect to the articles potentially 

subject to the orders; and 

(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, 

Complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to an exclusion order 

and a cease and desist order within a 

commercially reasonable time. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, five 

business days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2754’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf ). 

Persons with questions regarding 

electronic filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

Issued: September 3, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22486 Filed 9–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–734] 

Certain Adjustable-Height Beds and 

Components Thereof; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

54912 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 174 / Thursday, September 9, 2010 / Notices 

1For purposes of these investigations, the 

Department of Commerce has defined the subject 

International Trade Commission on 

August 5, 2010, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Invacare 

Corporation of Elyria, Ohio. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain adjustableheight beds and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent No. 6,983,495 (‘‘the ’495 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,997,082 (‘‘the 

’082 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,302,716 

(‘‘the ’716 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

7,441,289 (‘‘the ’289 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal at 202–205–1810. Persons with 

mobility impairments who will need 

special assistance in gaining access to 

the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey T. Hsu, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2579. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 1, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain adjustable-height 

beds and components thereof that 

infringe one or more of claims 1–8, 12– 

14, 26, and 27 of the ’495 patent; claims 

1, 2, 5, 10–12, 14, and 18–23 of the ’082 

patent; claims 1–3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 

14, and 18 of the ’716 patent; and claims 

8 and 9 of the ’289 patent, and whether 

an industry in the United States exists 

as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact on 

this issue; (3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Invacare Corporation, One Invacare 

Way, Elyria, OH 44035. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Medical Depot, Inc., d/b/a Drive 

Medical Design and Manufacturing, 

99 Seaview Boulevard, Port 

Washington, NY 11050. 

Shanghai Shunlong Physical Therapy 

Equipment Co., Ltd., No. 259 Jiugan 

Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, 

China 201601. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Jeffrey T. Hsu, Esq., Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 

20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: September 2, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22402 Filed 9–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–474 (Final) and 

731–TA–1176 (Final)] 

Drill Pipe and Drill Collars From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of the final phase of 

countervailing duty and antidumping 

investigations. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of the final 

phase of countervailing duty 

investigation No. 701–TA–474 (Final) 

under section 705(b) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)) (the Act) and 

the final phase of antidumping 

investigation No. 731–TA–1176 (Final) 

under section 735(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1673d(b)) to determine whether 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured or threatened with 

material injury, or the establishment of 

an industry in the United States is 

materially retarded, by reason of 

subsidized and less-than-fair-value 

imports from China of drill pipe and 

drill collars, primarily provided for in 

subheadings 7304.22, 7304.23, and 

8431.43 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States.1

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES