alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force sharpens competitive edge with roadmap to reformPublished March 4, 2019
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **Arlington, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force released its first business operations plan, March 4, establishing a roadmap for reform and improvement in its practices and processes.“This plan clearly articulates how we are getting ready to meet the challenges of an era of great power competition,” said Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew P. Donovan.The two-year plan outlines measureable goals and clear lines of accountability to improve internal operations within the service. Some of the plan’s objectives include boosting aviator retention, adding family support programs, increasing data availability and implementing conditions-based aircraft maintenance.“Sharpening the Air Force’s competitive edge means building a more lethal, ready force for the high-end fight,” Donovan said. “It means reforming everything from organizational structures to outdated policies so our warfighters can increase their effectiveness ... while remaining good stewards of the taxpayer dollar.”The Air Force has nested its business operations under the National Defense Strategy and service strategic focus areas, concentrating on three lines of effort: rebuilding readiness and increasing the lethality of the force, strengthening alliances and attracting new partners and reforming business practices for greater performance and affordability.The plan, which spans fiscal years 2019 – 2021, is designed to be a management tool; specifically, it provides a cross-cutting framework to synchronize business operations across different organizational and functional boundaries and assign offices of primary responsibility.The under secretary of the Air Force, in his role as the department’s chief management officer, will lead the plan’s implementation. He will also oversee updates to the plan on a bi-annual basis and address emerging environmental and strategic factors.On a quarterly basis, leaders responsible for Air Force business operations objectives will report progress through the Air Force Productivity Council for accountability and ongoing metrics.The entire plan is available in the related link section.competitive 



Edge 



business 



operations 



plan 



reform 



roadmap 



improvement 



undersecretary 



aviator 



warfighter 



AF 



Air Force 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Heather Wilson 



Under Secretary of the Air Force 



Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew P. Donovan 



USecAF 



Matthew P. Donovan 



National Defense Strategy 



NDS Related Links
        FY19-21 Air Force Business Operations Plan Summary
            
            FY19-21 Air Force Business Operations Plan
#### GEORGE MANCINI v. BOARD OF REVIEW.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD KOLLING.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Order filed February 12, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00026-CV

____________

FORMOSA MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellant

V.

TRINA WACASEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-30881

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed January 10, 2013. To date, the 

filing fee of $175.00 has not been paid. Therefore, the court issues the following 

order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before February 27, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT



TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund V (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                        |  |  |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner Rancon Realty Fund V
News United States Air Force
 Recovery operations under way at Wright-Patterson AFBPublished May 29, 2019
                        
                        By 88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio  (AFNS) --**
                A total of 12 houses were deemed uninhabitable after a tornado swept through the Prairies at Wright Field housing area late on May 27.
Working with the privatized housing contractor, base officials inspected all units to identify structural damage. Displaced families were directed to temporary lodging facilities to ensure they had a safe place to stay during recovery operations.
Workers, including an army of volunteers, toiled throughout the day to clear downed trees and debris that covered the area. By day’s end, all roads had been cleared for traffic. In addition, electrical service was safely restored, including an inspection for any exposed or downed lines.
A boil advisory remains in effect. Water testing is expected to be complete May 29 followed by full restoration of service. In the meantime, residents are being provided bottled water at the Prairies Chapel Education Center.
The Prairies Child Development Center and Youth Center returned to normal operations on May 29 once power was restored and damage was sufficiently repaired to make the facilities safe for children.
A complete survey of Area A and Area B was completed with minimal damage including downed trees and debris. Airfield operations on Area A were suspended on May 28 until a thorough inspection of the taxiways and runways was completed, including the removal of 331 pounds of debris. Flight operations were declared safe early in the afternoon on May 28.
The Claims Center is being operated by the 88th Air Base Wing Legal Office in the Hope Hotel from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. daily to assist Airmen who suffered personal property damage.Air Force 



tornado 



recovery 



housing 



AF 



weather 



88th ABW 



Wright Patterson AFB 



repair 



damage 



LR
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elmer's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 22, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, William
W. Service, Chief Executive Officer (as Principal Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                 /s/ William W. Service
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 William W. Service
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 September 3, 2002
News United States Air Force
 Air Force orders B-1 safety stand-downPublished June 8, 2018
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                Gen. Robin Rand, the Air Force Global Strike Command commander, ordered a safety stand-down of the B-1B Lancer fleet June 7, 2018.
During the safety investigation process following an emergency landing of a B-1B in Midland, Texas, an issue with ejection seat components was discovered that necessitated the stand-down. As issues are resolved aircraft will return to flight.
The Safety Investigation Board is ongoing. The SIB’s purpose is to prevent future mishaps or losses and is comprised of experts who investigate the incident and recommend corrective actions. The safety of Airmen is the command’s top priority. The Air Force takes safety incidents seriously and works diligently to identify and correct potential causes.AFGSC 



Global 



Strike 



Command 



safety 



Stand Down 



Barksdale AFB 



B-1B 



Lancer 



fleet 



SIB 



investigation
News United States Air Force
 AFIT earns new research classification rankingPublished Jan. 22, 2019
                        
                        By Katie Scott
                        
                        
                        Air Force Institute of Technology
                **Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                The Air University’s Air Force Institute of Technology entered the category of High Research Activity for a doctoral university from the 2018 update of the Carnegie classification. AFIT is the only Department of Defense academic institution to hold this specific categorization.
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education was developed in the 1970s by the Center for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University as a taxonomy to classify colleges and universities in the U.S. to enable a more accurate comparison of institutions. Classifications are determined based on the institution’s level of research activity as measured by expenditures, number of doctorates awarded and number of faculty.
To qualify for the doctoral university High Research Activity classification, an institution must award at least 20 research-based doctoral degrees per year and report at least $5 million in total research expenditures. For the academic year 2016-17, High Research Activity institutions had a mean research expenditure of $43 million and a mean number of science, technology, engineering and math doctorate conferrals of 28 per year.
In fiscal year 2018, AFIT’s Graduate School of Engineering Management executed $24 million of sponsored research funding, for a total of $33 million in expenditures including cost share and equipment purchases. AFIT has granted more than 865 doctor of philosophy degrees since 1972 when the doctoral program received full accreditation.
“AFIT’s research programs are integral to its graduate degree programs, allowing students to develop enhanced understanding of their disciplines’ fundamental principles,” said Dr. Todd Stewart, AFIT director and chancellor. “The research our students and faculty conduct also get after the most pressing unanswered questions related to current or anticipated Air Force and Department of Defense needs.”
AFIT is committed to providing innovative, defense-focused graduate education and related research and operationally-relevant professional continuing education, to sustain the technological supremacy of America’s air, space, and cyber forces.  For more information about AFIT and its programs, please visit **www.afit.edu**.Air Force 



AF 



stem 



AFIT 



Air Force Institute of Technology 



AU 



High Research Activity 



Carnegie classification 



Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education 



Graduate School of Engineering Management 



Air University
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         Oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>            Nov-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>              Jan-31-1999
<CASH>                         228768
<SECURITIES>                   980268
<RECEIVABLES>                  548873
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                     38549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               874344
<PP&E>                        1732366
<DEPRECIATION>                 636187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3338530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          398045
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                        19580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                    2411069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3338530
<SALES>                       1278467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1303352
<CGS>                           53019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1283899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               3026
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (78597)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (78597)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                  (78597)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.02)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Income Fund (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Paul M Zlotoff, General Partner of the Partnership, Joel
Schwartz, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

P.I. Associates Limited Partnership its General Partner

/s/ Paul M. Zlotoff

-----------------------------------
By: Paul M Zlotoff, General Partner

/s/ Joel Schwartz

----------------------------------------------
By: Joel Schwartz, Principal Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR MONTES

- ROBLES,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 73983

Agency No. A095

- 808

- 818

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017 **

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Montes

- Robles, a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal

. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review fo r

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 15 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 73983

substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination.

Gutierrez v. Mukasey , 5 21 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 20 08). We dismiss in part

and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Montes

- Robles’ contentions that the IJ

violated his due process righ ts because he did not raise these claims to the BIA.

See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 67 7

- 7 8 (9th Cir. 2004) ( petitioner must

exhaust claims in administrative proceedings below ).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Montes

Robles failed to establish eligibility for cancellation of removal where the record

indicates that he accepted voluntary departure in lieu of removal proceedings
, breaking his accrual of continuous physical presence

. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229b(b)(1) (A); Gutierrez , 521 F.3d at 1117

- 18 (substantial evidence supported

IJ’s determination that petitioner voluntarily departed in lieu of facing removal

proceedings); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(4)(B) (petitioner bears the burden of

showing eligibility). We reject Montes

- Robles’ contention that the BIA’s analysis

was insufficient.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kopin Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Sneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: May 11, 2006By:

/S/    RICHARD A.
SNEIDERRichard A. Sneider Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,783-01

EX PARTE RAYMOND EARL COOPER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 12-0292X(A) IN THE 71st DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRISON COUNTY

Per curiam. Keller, PJ., Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

online solicitation of a minor. He was sentenced to ten years’ community supervision on count one

and two years’ imprisonment on count two. He did not appeal his conviction. 

This Court, in Ex parte Lo, held unconstitutional the online solicitation of a minor statute for

which Applicant was convicted. Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant,

through counsel, filed this habeas application based on the Lo decision and asks that his conviction
2

be set aside. The State agrees that Applicant’s conviction should be set aside. We agree that

Applicant is entitled to relief. However, this Court has jurisdiction to grant relief only as to count

two of the judgment. The sentence in count one is probated and relief is not available pursuant to

Article 11.07. 

1

Therefore, relief is granted only on count two of the judgment. The judgment in Cause No.

12-0292X(A) in the 71st District Court of Harrison County is set aside as it pertains to count two,

and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harrison County to answer the charges

as set out in the indictment so that the indictment, as it pertains to count two, may be disposed of in

accordance with this Court’s opinion in Ex parte Lo. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

The application as it pertains to count one is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 7, 2014

Do not publish

 Because the Applicant was granted probation on count one, his conviction is not final as 1

to that count. Ex parte Twyman, 716 S.W.2d 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). A writ application

under Article 11.07 may be used to challenge a final conviction only and, as to the probated

count of the judgment, the Applicant must seek relief pursuant to Art. 11.072 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure. Ex parte Hiracheta 307 S.W.3d 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HARRY JENKINS.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elmer's  Restaurants,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 11, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce
N.  Davis,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Elmer's  Restaurants,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Elmer's
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Bruce N. Davis
-------------------------------------
Bruce N. Davis
Chief Executive Officer and President
November 18, 2004