alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force sports seeks male, female softball playersPublished May 2, 2019
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force is looking for men and women for 2019 Air Force Softball Trial Camps. The men’s camp is at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, and the women’s is at Hurlburt Field, Florida. Both camps are July 25 – Aug. 11.
Armed Forces Softball Championships are Aug. 12-18 at Pensacola Naval Air Station, Florida.
Applications are due no later than June 3 for coaching staffs and June 10 for athletes. Active-duty, guard and reserve members can apply through the APPTRAC system. Access the application site at **https://cloud.mwr.army.mil/apptrac/atwsc/apptrac.wsc/wb1000.html?wbp=5**. Commanders, supervisors, athletes, coaches and trainers must create an account to complete the application process using APPTRAC.
Continued support of the Air Force Fitness and Sports Program enables the Air Force to build strong, competitive teams who showcase the service at Armed Forces Championships and tournaments, said Air Force Services Activity officials.JB San Antonio-Lackland 



Air Education and Training Command 



AETC 



joint base 



Air Force 



AF 



armed forces 



softball 



male 



female 



Air Force Fitness and Sports Program 



Armed Forces Championships 



Air Force Services Activity 



Eglin AFB 



Air Force Base 



Hurlburt Field 



Pensacola NAS 



Naval Air Station
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35141]


U. S. Rail Corporation--Construction and Operation Exemption--
Brookhaven Rail Terminal

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of Board Action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Subject to environmental mitigation conditions, the Board is 
granting an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10901 for U. S. Rail Corporation (U. S. Rail) 
to construct and operate a line of railroad at a 28-acre site to be 
known as the Brookhaven Rail Terminal (BRT), in Brookhaven, Suffolk 
County, N.Y. According to U. S. Rail, the total length of the track to 
be constructed is about 18,000 feet. The purpose of the proposed 
construction is to enable U. S. Rail to serve the BRT as a common 
carrier and to deliver up to 500,000 tons of aggregate annually from 
sources in upstate New York to Sills Road Realty, LLC (Sills), the 
owner of the underlying property, and its affiliates and related 
companies on Long Island. The project is intended to reduce Sills' 
reliance on truck transport of aggregate through the New York City 
metropolitan region.

DATES: The exemption will be effective on September 20, 2010. Petitions 
to reconsider must be filed on September 20, 2010.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to FD 
35141, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of all 
pleadings must be served on petitioner's representative: James Savage, 
John D. Heffner, PLLC, 1750 K Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 
20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Dettmar, (202) 245-0395. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at: (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web 
site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: September 8, 2010.

    By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Nottingham.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-22756 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Converted by EDGARwiz








	
	










October 14, 2014




Kam Mahdi

Chief Executive Officer

Probe Manufacturing, Incorporated




RE:

Letter of Intent




Dear Kam:




Please allow this Letter of Intent to memorialize our discussions regarding a strategic, long term partnership between Probe and S-Ray.




1.

All Probe shareholders of record as of October 31, 2014 will be issued shares from a pool of 1,000,000 shares of S-Ray common stock on a pro rata basis in exchange for 75,000,000 shares of Probe common stock.

2.

With respect to existing Probe shareholders holding preferred convertible positions, I am prepared to accommodate their goals, including payment of existing notes, at closing.

3.

I would be honored to be invited to join the Probe board of directors and would accept the position of Chairman if offered.

4.

This transaction is conditioned upon approval of a majority of Probe shareholders.

5.

Both parties agree to make best efforts to close this proposed transaction within 60 days or sooner.

6.

S-Ray is prepared to sign a manufacturing and distribution rights agreement with Probe for our ClearScan LAB product.

a.

Probe would book the revenue from the product sales, regardless if it was to dental laboratories  or individual dentists.

b.

The agreement would allow Probe to control manufacturing costs and profits.

c.

S-Ray would be paid an annual royalty of 6% of total ClearView LAB revenue.

d.

The agreement would be a minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 5 years in term.

e.

Probe would have the right to sell or assign the agreement to another suitable manufacturing partner.

7.

S-Ray is currently accepting investment for ultrasound product development, including manufacturing equipment.  S-Ray believes it would be efficient to assist Probe with both capital and equipment to prepare for the manufacturing, testing and fulfillment of the ClearView LAB product.

8.

I would make personal efforts to assist in the capitalization of Probe using my relationships with the 150 S-Ray investors as well as our new investors.

9.

I am prepared to assist Probe in establishing commercial banking services including credit lines and debt, as needed, using my personal relationships and assets, including a personal guarantee if required.









50 West Liberty Street    Suite 880    Reno   Nevada   89501   USA
























In closing, if your board of directors agrees with the points of this Letter of Intent, I am prepared to move forward immediately and close this transaction in a matter of weeks.  I look forward to our next conversation, Kam.  




Sincerely,




/s/ Steve Baird

Steve Baird

Chief Executive Officer







Acceptance:










/s/ Kam Mahdi________

10/20/14_______

Kam Mahdi, CEO

Date

Probe Manufacturing, Inc.















Page 2 of 2
News United States Air Force
 Public health Airmen engage civilian partners during readiness trainingPublished June 20, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Jonathan Padish
                        
                        
                        175th Wing, Maryland Air National Guard
                **SIKESTON, Mo. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen deployed in support of Delta Area Economic Opportunity Corporation Tri-State Innovative Readiness Training 2019 coordinated with civilian agency partners to promote agency interoperability during public health site visits to multiple locations, June 18.The service members met with representatives from the Cape Girardeau County Public Health Commission to view operations at a livestock auction facility and a dairy farm.One of the goals of the visit was to better understand multi-agency involvement in the process that delivers food from producers to consumers.“Several agencies are involved in farm-to-table,” said Amy Morris, a Cape Girardeau County Public Health Commission, public health specialist supervisor. “In the beginning, the department of agriculture is involved. Once the animal is slaughtered, that’s when public health takes over.”Because of the nature of public health inspections, interagency cooperation is key.According to Morris, different agencies have different perspectives. If one agency sees something that warrants action by another agency, the agencies can communicate to ensure all issues are addressed correctly.Military public health specialists assigned to DAEOC Tri-State IRT 2019 agreed with the emphasis on interagency collaboration.Tech. Sgt. Erika Dolinsek, a 176th Wing, Alaska Air National Guard public health specialist, said proactive engagement with civilian agencies ensures open lines of communication between points of contact in the event of an emergency or natural disaster.Moreover, proactive public health education means a healthy community.Morris said the main goal of public health is to reduce the overall number of illnesses. For the military, the goal of public health is the same.“For us, the main thing is preventative care,” said Dolinsek. “Our goal is to make sure people are better educated about public health.”DAEOC Tri-State IRT 2019 is a joint service training exercise that leverages military and community resources to provide military training to service members, including engagement with community partners to promote interagency operability and share organizational best practices.Air National Guard 



Air Force Reserve 



ANG 



Joint Training 



readiness 



public health 



bioenvironmental 



IRT 



community partners 



Delta Area Economic Opportunity Corporation Tri-State Innovative Readiness Training 2019 



DAEOC Tri-State IRT 2019 



livestock processes 



AFWN
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
85-B  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of Net Lease Management
85-B, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of Net Lease Management
85-B,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              Net Lease Management 85-B, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 11, 2004



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              Net Lease Management 85-B, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 11, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Executive Panel will deliberate on the findings and proposed recommendations of the Technical Diversity Subcommittee to the CNO. The meeting will consist of discussions of current and future Navy strategy, plans, and policies regarding the utilization of technically diverse systems, primarily associated with information management systems.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 30, 2010, from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in CNA conference room, located at 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Bree Hartlage, CNO Executive Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846, 703-681-4907.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Individuals or interested groups may submit written statements for consideration by the CNO Executive Panel at any time or in response to the agenda of a scheduled meeting. All requests must be submitted to the Designated Federal Officer at the address detailed below.

If the written statement is in response to the agenda mentioned in this meeting notice then the statement, if it is to be considered by the Panel for this meeting, must be received at least five days prior to the meeting in question.

The Designated Federal Officer will review all timely submissions with the CNO Executive Panel Chairperson, and ensure they are provided to members of the CNO Executive Panel before the meeting that is the subject of this notice.

To contact the Designated Federal Officer, write to Executive Director, CNO Executive Panel (N00K), 4825 Mark Center Drive, 2nd Floor, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846.

Dated: September 1, 2010.

D.J. Werner

Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-22453 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10649 Conference Calendar

TOMMY L. PARKER, Rabbi, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RON McLAURIN; JESSE MENDEZ, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CV-115-C

- - - - - - - - - - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Tommy L. Parker, a Texas resident, appeals from the district court’s order granting the defendants’ F ED . R. C IV . P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss his complaint, purportedly filed pursuant to the civil rights provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Parker sought damages from the defendants, McLaurin and Mendez, who are attorneys in private practice, for violations of his due process rights. Parker made the following allegations: After he hired McLaurin to represent him in a state-law matter, McLaurin effectively abandoned him. Parker then sued McLaurin, United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-10649 -2- who hired Mendez as his own attorney. During this second proceeding, McLaurin perjured himself, and both McLaurin and Mendez engaged in improper ex parte communications with the trial judge. The district court granted the defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion on the ground that Parker’s allegations failed to establish that either defendant had acted under “color of state law.” See Morris v. Dearborne , 181 F.3d 657, 666 n.6 (5th Cir. 1999). In his pro se appellate brief, Parker has failed to challenge the legal basis upon which the district court dismissed his complaint. Failure to identify an error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if Parker had not appealed the judgment. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, Parker’s appeal is without arguable merit, Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983), and we DISMISS the appeal as frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Parker’s motion to amend his reply brief is DENIED as

unnecessary. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO AMEND DENIED.
#### Leonard Jones *versus*Jewett Archer.

Where a justice, having decided in favor of the defendant, upon the merits, taxes his costs, but includes in them a part of the costs of the *plaintiff,*and gives judgment for the whole amount, the judgment may be *reversed*as to the costs, and *affirmed*as to the residue.

Certiorari to review a judgment of one of the assistant justices, in and for the 12th Ward of the city of New-York.

The plaintiff, in error, brought an action of assumpsit in the court below, against the defendant, in error, and declared for work, labor, and materials. At the trial of the cause, several witnesses were introduced by each party, and the evidence upon the merits was contradictory. The justice, after weighing the testimony, decided in favor of the defendant; and upon taxing the costs, he included therein several items of the plaintiff’s costs, amounting in the whole to $4.14. The plaintiff, thereupon, brought the cause before this court by a *certiorari,*and *Mr. W. H. Elting,*in his behalf, insisted that the judgment was erroneous, both on account of the error as to the costs, and as being against the weight of evidence. [He cited *Dennison v. Collins,*1 *Cowen’s R. 111. Field v. MeVickar,*9 *John. R.*130.]

*Mr. Cannon, contra,*

contended that the judgment was according to the evidence; but if it was not, that this court would not undertake to reverse it, where the testimony wp contradictory. He insisted that *all*the costs were to be taxed against the losing party, as a matter of course.

*Per Curiam.*

The justice having given judgment for the defendant below, on the merits, taxed his costs, and included in them the costs of the plaintiff, or a part of them, and rendered judgment for those costs in favor of the defendant. This was erroneous, on the authority of the case of *Dennison v. Collins,*[1 *Cowen’s Rep.*111.] In that case, the judgment was affirmed as to the damages, and *350reversed as to the *costs,*on the ground that one item in the bill was illegally charged.

Upon the merits, in this case, the justice decided that the plaintiff ought not to recover. There was evidence to support that view of the case, and we do not reverse a justice’s judgment, upon the ground that he has decided against evidence, unless the mistake is very clear.

*Judgment reversed as to the costs, and affirmed as to the residue.*

[W. H. Elting, *Att'y for the plff.*J. M. Cannon, *Att'y for the deft.]*
EXHIBIT 32.a

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Westwood  One,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Shane Coppola,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/S/ Shane Coppola
-----------------
Shane Coppola
November 14, 2003

This statement is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission as
an exhibit to this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         463,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,823,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    199,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,901,000
<PP&E>                                       3,935,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,242,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,634,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,935,000
<BONDS>                                        216,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    444,000
<COMMON>                                       118,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (127,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,634,000
<SALES>                                     11,548,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,548,000
<CGS>                                        9,996,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,996,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             230,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (463,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (463,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (302,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (765,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 

RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Vinay Shah, certify that: 

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Aravive, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: April 29, 2019

 

| By:    |    | /s/ Vinay Shah                                                           |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |         | Name: Vinay Shah                                                    |
|   |         | Title:  Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |