alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Postmedia Network Canada Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas Lamb,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                                     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                     
| | 
| |  | /s/ Douglas Lamb                                    
| |  | Douglas Lamb                                        
| |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 28, 2011.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6649

CONRAD R. GAINES, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3964-AW) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Conrad R. Gaines, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). The district court dismissed Appellant’s § 2254 petition as untimely pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West Supp. 1998). We need not decide whether the district court properly found that Appellant’s second state habeas petition did not constitute a proper filing under § 2244(d). Even assuming Appellant’s state habeas petition was properly filed, his federal habeas petition is still untimely. After Appellant filed his second state habeas petition on February 26, 1997, he had at most fifty-seven days remaining in theone-year statute of limitations period under § 2244(d). Consequently, when the state court denied his state habeas petition onSeptember 5, 1997, Appellant had until November 3, 1997 (fiftyseven days), to file his federal habeas petition. Because Appellant did not seek federal habeas review until November 24, 1997, we find his § 2254 petition untimely.Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 75 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6254-S6255]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE SENATE ON 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF V-E DAY

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, today is a very important day for a number 
of people on this Senate floor. It is V-E Day. May 8, 1945, was a very 
important day. We have a V-E Day resolution that I think deserves a 
rollcall. I hope my colleagues would agree that, immediately after the 
cloture vote, we would have a vote on the V-E Day resolution.
  I send that resolution to the desk and ask that it be read.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       A resolution (S. Res. 115) expressing the sense of the 
     Senate that America's World War II veterans and their 
     families are deserving of this nation's respect and 
     appreciation on the 50th anniversary of V-E Day.
  The resolution is as follows:

       Whereas on May 7, 1945 in Reims, France, the German High 
     Command signed the document of surrender, surrendering all 
     air, land and sea forces unconditionally to the Allies;
       Whereas President Harry S Truman proclaimed May 8, 1945 to 
     be V-E Day:
       Whereas May 8, 1995 is the 50th Anniversary of that 
     proclamation:
       Whereas, the courage and sacrifice of the American fighting 
     men and women who served with distinction to save the world 
     from tyranny and aggression should always be remembered; Now, 
     therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the United States Senate joins with a 
     grateful nation in expressing our respect and appreciation to 
     the men and women who served in World War II, and their 
     families. Further, we remember and pay tribute to those 
     Americans who made the ultimate sacrifice and gave their life 
     for their country.

  The Senate proceeded to consider the resolution.
  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, it is a very brief resolution. I have taken 
the liberty of adding World War II veterans as cosponsors. If some do 
not want to--I have Senator Exon, Senator Hollings, Senator Glenn, 
Senator Inouye, Senator Stevens, Senator Helms--I think there are a 
couple of others--Senator Heflin.
  Mr. HOLLINGS. Senator Thurmond.
  Mr. DOLE. Senator Thurmond. I will furnish those names at the desk.
  So I hope, unless there is some objection on the other side, that 
that vote could follow immediately the vote on cloture.
[[Page S6255]]

  Mr. HOLLINGS. We have no objection.
  Mr. DOLE. So, Mr. President, the yeas and nays are automatic on the 
cloture vote. Let me ask for the yeas and nays on the V-E Day 
resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
  There is a sufficient second.
  The yeas and nays were ordered.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55406-55407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income 
Tax Credit Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be Wednesday, October 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7978.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Project Committee will be held Wednesday, October 27, 2010, at 
1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information, please contact 
Ms. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 
South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or

[[Page 55407]]

contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22577 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
CONSENT OF EXPERT


Reference is made to the feasibility study entitled “Feasibility Study and Technical Report Update on the Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” with an effective date of June 19, 2014 (the “Report”).
  I, Pierre Pelletier, on behalf ofERM Rescan(the “Company”), consent to the use of the Company’s name and references to the Report, and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report, in(i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (ii) Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726 and 333-197304) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Very truly yours,
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on August 14, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”), I,Randolph K. Geissler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                    ThePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                    Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 14, 2003 | /s/ RANDOLPH  K. GEISSLER  |   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                         | Randolph K.  Geissler      |
|                         | Chief  Executive Officer   |
|                         | Digital  Angel Corporation |

 

----
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing

Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO LOAN ENHANCED TRUST 2011-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW
Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 30, 2011 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by
and among Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2011-1, as Issuer, Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC as Seller, VW Credit, Inc., as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from March 30, 2011 through December 31, 2011, and of its performance under the Sale and
Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this
twenty-seventh day of March, 2012.



| |  |  |  |  |  |                     
| |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Bruce Harris    
| |  |  |  |  |  | Bruce Harris        
| |  |  |  |  |  | Vice President & CFO
News United States Air Force
 39th Airlift Squadron hits west coast skies, drops 200 MarinesPublished Aug. 22, 2019
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class River Bruce
                        
                        
                        7th Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **RENO, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                Members of the 317th Airlift Wing at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, trained in airspace over Nevada and California, August 8–16.
This training was designed to prepare 39th Airlift Squadron aircrew for future deployed operations in mountainous terrains.
Pilots experience higher atmospheric pressure at high altitudes which change the way landings feel, said Capt. Matthew Rounds, 39th AS C-130J Super Hercules pilot. Newer pilots were able to train on operating in these conditions for the first time.
“We operated out of Reno-Tahoe International Airport, which has similar elevations to areas we operate overseas,” Rounds said .
Aircrews worked on various airlift procedures such as the combat offload.
The combat offload is a method used by C-130 aircrew to deliver cargo in hazardous environments. It involves a fast landing and is followed by an abrupt takeoff that allows for cargo to roll out of the back of the aircraft to support missions on the ground.
“One of the biggest wins of this training was building rapport within the units involved in our deployments,” Rounds said. “Our loadmasters were in sync with pilots and our maintainers kept our aircraft good to go. Deployers were able to work side-by-side with the same people they’ll work with overseas.”
The 39th AS also built relationships with Marines assigned to Camp Pendleton, California.
“We had the pleasure of working with over 200 Marines, for high-altitude, low-opening (HALO) and static-line parachute drops,” Rounds said.
The HALO drops consisted of  five to 10 Marines jumping out of the rear of the C-130J at altitudes higher than 3,500 feet. Static-line drops were conducted at 1,250 feet. For each static-line pass, approximately 20 Marines jumped one-by-one with parachutes deploying immediately upon their departure.
Marines were able to make multiple jumps during the week and became up-to-date on their requirements for deployment readiness, said Staff Sgt. Carlos Camacho, 1st Transportation Support Battalion jump master.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



39th Airlift Squadron 



Dyess Air Force Base 



Texas 



Reno 



Joint service training 



HALO drops 



High-altitude low-opening 



Combat offload 



USMC 



Marine Corps
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4482]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 FURTHER APPOINTMENT OF CONFEREE ON H.R. 1158, EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL 
     APPROPRIATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE AND MAKING 
                    RESCISSIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the authority of the Speaker 
under clause 6-F of rule 10, without objection, the Chair appoints the 
gentleman from California [Mr. Packard] as a manager on the part of the 
House in the committee of conference on H.R. 1158.
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will notify the Senate of the 
change in conferee.

                          ____________________
```
Motion Granted; Continuing Abatement Order filed November 16, 2017. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00549-CV

____________

RONETTA PRICE, Appellant

V.

EDGAR GARCIA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-CV-0067

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

The court abated this appeal on September 7, 2017 to allow the parties to 

mediate this case. On November 13, 2017, appellant filed an unopposed motion to 

extend the abatement period to allow the parties to finalize a settlement. The 

motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket until December 13, 2017. The appeal will be reinstated on this 

court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the 
appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate 

motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the 

appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-108)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: September 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward K. Fein, Patent Counsel, 
Johnson Space Center, Mail Code AL, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 
77058, (281) 483-4871; (281) 483-6936 [Facsimile].
    NASA Case No. MSC-24238-1: Microwave Tissue Welding for Wound 
Closure.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22389 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number 0-14691
 WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
  Delaware
    
    95-3980449(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)40 West
57thStreet,
5thFloor, New York, NY
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    10019
(Zip Code)
 (212) 641-2000
 
 þ o
  Large Accelerated Filer o
    
    Accelerated Filer þ
    
    Non-Accelerated Filer o
    
    Smaller Reporting Company o
 o þ
  
 Explanatory Note




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXExhibit 3.1Exhibit 31.aExhibit 31.b    Table of Contents  
 
 SIGNATURES
  WESTWOOD ONE, INC.By:

    /S/ Thomas F.X. BeusseName: Thomas F.X. BeusseTitle: Chief Executive OfficerBy:

    /S/ Gary J. YuskoName: Gary J. YuskoTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 22, 2008




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit3.1*
    
    Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.31.a*
    
    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.b*
    
    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 *
    
    Filed herewith.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2775 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt aircraft management 

services from the ticket tax. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2014 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

aircraft management services from the ticket tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TICKET TAX FOR AIRCRAFT 

4 MANAGEMENT SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4261 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 

7 (k) as subsection (l) and by inserting after subsection (j) 

8 the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(k) EXEMPTION FOR AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT

10 SERVICES.— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2775 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The tax imposed by this 

2 section or section 4271 shall not apply to the provi3 sion of aircraft management services for flights 

4 under the aviation safety regulations of part 91 of 

5 title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. 

6 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not ex7 empt flights for the transportation of persons under 

8 the aviation safety regulations of part 135 of title 

9 14, Code of Federal Regulations. 

10 ‘‘(3) AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT SERVICES.—For 

11 purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘aircraft man12 agement services’ means scheduling, flight planning, 

13 weather forecasting, and operation of flights; obtain14 ing insurance; maintenance, storage and fueling of 

15 aircraft; hiring, training and provision of pilots and 

16 crew; establishing and complying with safety stand17 ards; and such other services necessary to support 

18 flights.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to transportation beginning after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40973

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE GREGORIO ESTRADA,

also known as Jose,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-95-CR-307-7

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Gregorio Estrada challenges his sentence for possession

with the intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Estrada contends

that the United States Sentencing Commission violated his Fifth

Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection rights when it

promulgated Sentencing Guidelines that permit the leader of a

conspiracy to receive a sentence less severe than that received

by a minor participant in the conspiracy.
No. 97-40973 

-2-

Estrada’s argument is unavailing because he was not

sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines. Rather, he was

sentenced pursuant to the terms of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). A

sentence imposed in accordance with § 841 violates neither the

defendant’s rights under the Due Process or Equal Protection

Clauses. See United States v. Rojas-Martinez, 968 F.2d 415,

419-20 (5th Cir. 1992). Estrada’s claim is also unavailing

because a defendant cannot attack his sentence solely on the

ground that a codefendant received a lesser one. See United

States v. Boyd, 885 F.2d 246, 249 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly,

Estrada’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID JOHN VITALE.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.