alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 188th Wing activates UPAD for Hurricane Florence ResponsePublished Sept. 14, 2018
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. John E. Hillier
                        
                        
                        188th Wing Public Affairs
                **EBBING AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Ark. (AFNS) --**
                The Arkansas Air National Guard’s 188th Wing activated its Unclassified Processing, Assessment and Dissemination capability in response to Hurricane Florence September 13, providing imagery, geospatial, and assessment support to incident commanders in affected areas.The 188th Wing’s UPAD allows Airmen to rapidly analyze imagery from a variety of platforms, including satellites as well as manned or unmanned aircraft, and distribute tailored reports to meet mission requirements. It can also produce pre-incident imagery products, graphical overlays, and post-incident damage assessment products.“Disaster response is what we train for,” said Col. Robert Kinney, 188th Wing commander. “This is why America has a National Guard: To save lives at home, to fight our nation’s wars, and to build partnerships at home and abroad.”Because UPAD capabilities provided to state and local authorities are produced remotely, 188th Wing Airmen are not required to be in the areas affected by the storm, freeing up local resources needed for responders on the ground. Kinney said that the wing will activate approximately 15 Airmen for the next three weeks, or as long as they are needed.The 188th Wing’s UPAD is one of 12 such sites across Air National Guard intelligence units and was the first to volunteer in response to the storm. “The skills that our analysts use to support troops on the battlefield are the same skills used responding to Florence today,” said Capt. Lonnie Nicholson, Unclassified Processing, Assessment, and Dissemination officer in charge. “We’ve hit the ground running and are already pushing out products to support North Carolina.”The UPAD previously activated in response to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria in September 2017. Airmen from the 188th Wing supplied more than 2,000 information products including damage and debris assessments, evacuation route assessments, lines of communication assessments, vantage point assessments for air traffic control teams, and flood potential assessments. Those responses were in addition to the mission they perform every day, accomplishing national military objectives around the globe.Air Force 



satellite 



Air National Guard 



AF 



UAV 



support 



unmanned aerial vehicle 



capability 



response 



Florence 



reports 



188th Wing 



imagery 



UPAD 



Ebbing ANG Base 



Arkansas ANG 



Unclassified Processing Assessment and Dissemination 



analyze 



geospatial 



hurricane
II 

Calendar No. 482 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2406 

To amend title XII of the Public Health Service Act to expand the definition 

of trauma to include thermal, electrical, chemical, radioactive, and other 

extrinsic agents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2014 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BURR, Mr. HARKIN, Ms. WARREN, 

and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JULY 23, 2014 

Reported by Mr. HARKIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend title XII of the Public Health Service Act to 

expand the definition of trauma to include thermal, electrical, chemical, radioactive, and other extrinsic agents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Trauma 

5 Care Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2406 RS

1 SEC. 2. TRAUMA DEFINITION. 

2 (a) REVISED DEFINITION UNDER TRAUMA SYSTEMS

3 GRANTS PROGRAMS.—Paragraph (4) of section 1231 of 

4 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d–31) is 

5 amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(4) TRAUMA.—The term ‘trauma’ means an 

7 injury resulting from exposure to— 

8 ‘‘(A) a mechanical force; or 

9 ‘‘(B) another extrinsic agent, including an 

10 extrinsic agent that is thermal, electrical, chem11 ical, or radioactive.’’. 

12 (b) REVISED DEFINITION UNDER INTERAGENCY

13 PROGRAM FOR TRAUMA RESEARCH.—Paragraph (3) of 

14 section 1261(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 300d–61(h)) is amended to read as follows: 

16 ‘‘(3) The term ‘trauma’ means an injury result17 ing from exposure to— 

18 ‘‘(A) a mechanical force; or 

19 ‘‘(B) another extrinsic agent, including an 

20 extrinsic agent that is thermal, electrical, chem21 ical, or radioactive.’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 482 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2406 

A BILL 

To amend title XII of the Public Health Service 

other extrinsic agents. thermal, electrical, chemical, radioactive, and Act to expand the definition of trauma to include 

JULY 23, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 13, 2010. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be held Wednesday, October 13, 2010, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: September 1, 2010. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2010-22576 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Redstone Literary Agents, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mary S. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of May, 2012.


/s/ Mary S. Wolf
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### SHARON L. GRENELL v. MARTIN G. SIMMONS.

June 25, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2011 (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2011-1, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as
Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2013 and ending on February 28, 2014 and of the Servicers performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made
under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing
Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers
Certificate this 23rd day of May, 2014.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. ReedyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 30, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00177

- CR

Alejandro Leal PENA

, Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atasco sa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 090168

- CRA Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On October 2 , 2014, this court abated this appeal to the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2). The t rial court conducted the hearing, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of

fact and conclusions of law has been filed. The trial court determined that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and is indigent. The trial court further determined that appointed counsel has not abandoned this appeal

. The trial court concluded that “effective assistance of counsel will be best accomplished by continuing Mr. Shaughnessy as appellate counsel” and recommended that this court gra nt Mr. Shaughnessy an extension of time to file to November 15, 2014, to file appellant’s brief.

On October 22, 2014, Mr. Shaughnessy filed a motion requesting an extension of time to November 15, 2014. On October 29, 2014, Mr. Shaughnessy filed appel lant’s brief.

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is reinstated on the docket of this court. The

motion for extension of time is MOOT

.

_________________________________ Catherine Sto ne, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of October, 2014

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 23, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 23, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0443. CEDRIC GIBSON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1991C17160
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

CASH DEFERRAL PLAN

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) have previously approved the Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Cash Deferral Plan (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Plan, the Board is empowered to amend the Plan; and

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the engagement of a new third party servicer of the Plan, the Board determined to make certain administrative changes to the Plan as set forth in this Amendment #1 to the Plan (the “Amendment”).

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows effective as of the date hereof:

 

1.              The last sentence Section 4.1.2 is hereby amended and restated, which shall read in its entirety as follows:

 

“The Election of a Participant shall only be operative for the Plan Year with respect to which such Election is made; accordingly any Election filed for the initial Plan Year shall terminate on December 31, 2014.”

 

2.              All reference in the Plan’s adoption agreement (the “Adoption Agreement”) to “Principal Life Insurance Company” shall be changed to “ADP, LLC.”

 

3.              The date on which Participant Deferral Credits are made as provided under Section 2.9 of the Adoption Agreement shall be changed to the last business day of each payroll period during the Plan Year.

 

4.              Except as specifically provided in and modified by this Amendment, the Plan and the Adoption Agreement are in all other respects hereby ratified and confirmed and references to the Plan and the Adoption Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Plan and the Adoption Agreement as modified by this Amendment.

 











 

To record the adoption of this Amendment #1, to the Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Cash Deferral Plan, the Company has caused its authorized officer to affix its corporate name this 15th day of October, 2014.

 

	
 
    	
AMICUS   THERAPEUTICS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   William D. Baird III
    


 

2
EXHIBIT 31.b
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Westwood One, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 /S/ Gary J. YuskoGary J. YuskoChief Financial OfficerAugust 22, 2008
#### CAPITAL TRACTION COMPANY *v.*UNITED STATES.

Appeals; Writs of Error; Interlocutory Orders; Police Court.

A writ of error from this court to the police court does not lie to review an interlocutory order of that eourt, such as an order denying a motion to quash an information where the prosecution is still pending.

No. 2091.

Submitted January 4, 1910.

Decided April 5, 1910.

In error to the Police Court of the District of Columbia.

*Appeal dismissed.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. R. Ross Perry, Mr. R. Ross Perry, Jr.,*and *Mr. G. Thomas Dunlop*for the plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Daniel W. Balcer,*United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and *Mr. F. Sprigg Perry,*Assistant, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Yan Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case was brought here by the Capital Traction Company *592on a writ of error to the police court of the District of Colum-; bia to review an order denying a motion to quash an,information charging the appellant company with unlawfully operating a street railway car within the District of Columbia, “equipped with wheels causing unnecessary noise and unevenness in operation, commonly known as flat wheels.”. No final judgment was entered in this case. The order appealed from is a mere interlocutory order denying a motion to quash a criminal information. The case has not been dismissed in the court below, but stands ready for the plea of the defendant company and for trial. By a uniform line of decision, this court has held that an appeal will not lie from an order such as the one before us. The question here presented is purely a moot one, and the court will not stop to review it. The writ is dismissed, and it is so ordered. *Dismissed.*
News United States Air Force
 Department of the Air Force to consider military family support measures in future basing decisionsPublished Feb. 24, 2020
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force approved criteria Feb. 24 to assess states’ policies for accepting professional, career licenses and a community’s public education system support of military children as part of its strategic basing process.The addition of these criteria aims to ensure locations under consideration have sufficient support for the unique needs of military families who relocate frequently."The communities where service members live and work impact readiness, retention and the satisfaction of families,” said Secretary of the Air Force Barbara M. Barrett. “Future basing decisions made with a consistent framework will ensure optimal conditions for service members and their families."Military members report that local public education aspects and support for their children and the ability of their spouses to sustain careers move after move influence their decisions to remain on active duty.To address these concerns, the Air Force collaborated with policy professionals and subject matter experts to develop two types of analytic frameworks. The public education framework will be used to evaluate public school districts’ educational aspects and ability to support transferring military children in prekindergarten through 12th grade near Air Force installations.The licensure portability framework will be used to assess state laws, governors’ executive orders, state Supreme Court or bar association rules and the ability for an area to accommodate licenses earned from other locations.While mission requirements remain the top priority for where a mission is based, the Air Force has developed a process to include these support of military family considerations. The methodology for these criteria will be used for future basing decisions as the Air Force continues to collaborate with policy professionals and subject matter experts.“We know improving schools and changing licensure regulations take time, but efforts to meet the unique needs of military families are vital,” Barrett said. “States that have improved services for military families should be commended and emulated.”The criteria will be formally incorporated into the basing process in the spring.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



military 



family 



support 



basing 



decision 



professional 



career 



license 



education 



children 



spouse 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Barbara Barrett Related Links
        Support of Military Families - Public Education
            
            Support of Military Families - Licensure
# Supreme Court of Texas

**═══════════════════════** Misc. Docket No. 2 2

- 9080

**═══════════════════════**

T ransfer of C ase From the

First C ourt of A ppeals to the

Fourteenth C ourt of A ppeals

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Pursuant to Tex. Gov ’ t Code § 73.001, the following case is hereby transferred
from th e Cou rt of Appeals for the First District

, Houston , Texas, to the Cou rt of Appeals for the Fourteenth Distric t, Houston , Texas:

Case No. 01

- 22

- 0 0 547

- CV

In the Interest of D.L.C ., A Child v. Texas Department of Family and Protective
Services

The F irst Court of Appeals will make the necessary order s for the transfer of

the case directed hereby and will cause the Clerk of that Court to transfer or transmit all filings in the case, and verify all orders made, to the F ourteenth Court of Appeals. Upon completion of the transfer, the F irst Court of Appeals shall provide notice of the transfer to the Sup reme Court and the State Office of Court Administration.

ORDERED by the Supreme Court of Texas, in Chambers,

With the Seal thereof affixed at the City of Austin, this 20 th day of September , 20 2 2

.

_______________________________________ BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS