alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Neonatal Research Network.                    

*Date:*                         October 5-6, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-148,                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 2, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-22499 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD PAWLUK.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Nebraska. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3486

___________ George L. Shepard; Karan L. * Shepard, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the Unite d States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Harold W. Clarke; John Dahm; * Barb Hoagland; Jack Falconer, * [ UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 17 , 1997 Filed: September 22 , 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nebraska prisoner George L. Shepard and his wif e Karan L. Shepard appeal the district court & s grant o f 1 summary ju dgment to Nebraska prison officials in this 42 U.S.C. § 1 983 action against Lincoln Correctional Center corre ctional officers and supervisory officials. Th e-2-

Shepards alleged that the correctional officer s retaliated-3-

against George for filing grievances by refusing to le t Ka ran use padded chairs during visits and by denyin g vis itation on occasions when Karan did not wear a bras siere. The Shepards also alleged that th e supervisory officials cond oned the correctional officers & actions by denying George & s grievances.
Follow ing our de novo review, see Yowell v. Combs , 89 F.3d 542, 544 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review), we find that summary judgment was proper. See 8th Cir. R
. 47B. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the distric t court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4436]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1400
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker at 2 p.m.

                          ____________________
```
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to March 3, 2020)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-19-489 In re Interest of Nevail A.

A-19-836,

A-19-837 State v. Wright

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael T. MoeName: Michael T. Moe Date:March 17, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22345]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Friday, September 
10, 2010 at 10 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Friday, 
September 10, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Adjudicatory matters; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 2, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22345 Filed 9-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark W. DeFoor, Chief Financial Officer of SECURE NetCheckIn Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The report of the Company on Form 10-K for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

Dated: June 21, 2013

By:

  /s/ *Mark W. DeFoor*

 

 

Mark W. DeFoor

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40555 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EDWARD HENRY BELUNEK, JR.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

(1:90-CR-25-1)

January 18, 1996 Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the distr ict court’s denial of his

motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He

contends that the district court abused its discretion by

concluding that U.S.S.G. § 2D1. 1, comment. (n.1), amendment 484,

was not applicable.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and2

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm essentially on

the reasoning of the district court. S e e also United States v.

Allison, 63 F.3d 350 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Taylor

, No.

94-40438 (5th Cir. Sept. 16, 1994) (unpublished).

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

F.T. JAMES CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

HOTEL SANCHO PANZA, LLC, and

JORDAN FOSTER CONSTRUCTION,

LLC,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00096

- CV

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019

- DCV

- 0505)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to compel arbitration. We therefore affirm the trial

court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to compel arbitration. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant all costs in this Court. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDER ED THIS 2 8 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 20 22

.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FIRST QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,256,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,396,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      7,348,155
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,015,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,396,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             240,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (214,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (214,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,727,260
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,512,779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   113.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   113.81
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00234-CV 

IN RE MIKE SMITH AND VAN 

SHAW

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and 

request for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and request for emergency 

relief are denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: July 8, 2013

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
# United States Cou rt of Appeals For the S eventh Circuit Chicago, Illin ois 60604 January 9, 2003 Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER , Circuit Ju dge Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBR OOK , Circuit Ju dge Hon. DANIEL A. M

ANION , Circuit Ju dge No. 02-1599 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee , v. CARLAN D. HODGES ,

Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. No. 99-CR-40009 Richard Mills , Judge

. O R D E R The opinion of this court issued this date is hereby corr ected. The district court number in th e caption incorre ctly indic ated a civil c ase and s hould have been 99-CR -40009.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00146-CV

______________________________

RUTH BARTLETT, Appellant

V.

ALEXANDER THERIOT, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 76th Judicial District Court

Titus County, Texas

Trial Court No. 32,023

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ruth Bartlett has filed her pro se notice of appeal from the trial court's judgment of

November 16, 2007. No clerk's record has been received by this Court.

The district clerk of Titus County has now notified this Court that Bartlett's motion for new

trial was granted by the trial court on February 29, 2008, and this cause has been set for a jury trial.

Because Bartlett's motion for new trial was granted, her appeal is now moot. See, e.g.,

Garcia-Udall v. Udall, 141 S.W.3d 323, 332 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, no pet.); Zapata v.

Rosenfeld, 811 S.W.2d 182, 183 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, writ denied).

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: March 31, 2008

Date Decided: April 1, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
Registrant is not a Bank or Savings and Loan Holding Comany.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000770975
<NAME> FIRST REPUBLIC BANCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,940
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    102,622
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          83,365
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            83,084
<LOANS>                                      1,939,153
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,183,453
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,377,882
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,676
<LONG-TERM>                                    621,564
<COMMON>                                       110,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,183,453
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 38,080
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,375
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                41,455
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,991
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,446
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,009
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,872
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,872
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.36
<LOANS-NON>                                     22,916
<LOANS-PAST>                                       631
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,142
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,520
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      215
<RECOVERIES>                                       546
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,351
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            18,351
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         17,692
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted



Pursuant to Section 906 of the



Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Transition Report of Geltology Inc.
(the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the transition period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.



|                  | /s/ Xingping Hou        | 
|----------------- | ----------------------- | 
|Name:             | Xingping Hou            | 
|Title:            | Chief Executive Officer | 
|                  |                         | 
|December 28, 2012 |                        
|                  |                        
|                  | /s/ Shaokang Zeng       | 
|Name:             | Shaokang Zeng           | 
|Title:            | Chief Financial Officer | 
|                  |                         | 
|December 28, 2012 |                        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.