alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.8**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the use in theAnnual Report on Form 40-F of **Quest Rare Minerals Ltd.** [the “Corporation”] of our report dated January 24, 2013 with respect to the financial statements of the Corporation as at October 31, 2012 and 2011, andNovember 1, 2010, and for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, and our report dated January 24, 2013 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012, included as Exhibit99.1 to, and incorporated by reference in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F. 

*(Signed)**Ernst & YoungLLP*

Ernst & Young LLP 

Chartered Professional Accountants 

Montréal, Canada 

January 24, 2013
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 11 63

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Edwar d L. Garl oc k, J r.
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Virg in iaLock ey , RN, Forres t Ci ty Medi um FCI; Mel is sa Lov ed ay , RN, Forres t Ci ty Medi um

FCI; Kari n C un ni ng ha m , RN, Forres t Ci ty Medi um FCI; San dr a Fu tre ll , RN, Forres t Ci ty Medi um FCI; USA
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Hel en a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Feb ru ary 22 , 20 19 Fi le d: Marc h 8 , 20 19 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BOW MAN, an d S TRAS, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In th is act io n un de r Bi ve ns v. Si x Unk no wn Nam ed Age nt s of Fed eral Bu reau of Narco ti cs , 40 3 U.S. 38 8 (1 97 1) , an d th e Fed eral Tort Cl ai m s Act (FTCA), fed eralin m at e Edwar d L. G a r lo ck , Jr ., ap pe al s fro m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t 1

di sm is si ng th e Bi ve ns cl ai m s wit ho ut pr ejud ic e an d g ran ti ng su m m ary jud gm en t t o th e Uni te d St at es on th e FTCA cl ai m. We co nc lu de th ere is no va li d ba si s fo r
rev ers al

. W e affi rm th e jud gm en t an d de ny Garl oc k’s pe nd in g m o t i o n fo r co un se l.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Bri an S. Mi ll er, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco mm e n d a t i on s of th e Hon or ab le Jo e J. Vol pe , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te J u d g e f o r th e East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. -2

-
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5739]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, there will now be a 
period for the transaction of morning business for not to extend beyond 
the hour of 10:30, with Senators permitted to speak therein for up to 5 
minutes each.
  The Senator from Missouri is recognized.
  Mr. ASHCROFT. Thank you, Madam President.

                          ____________________
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10870 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. VICTOR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15 -CR- 275 -1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Victor Martinez -Ramirez pleaded guilty to one count of being illegally present in the United States following deportation. The district court sentenced Martinez

- Ramirez within the applicable guidelines range to 46 months of imprisonment, to be followed by a three

- year term of su pervised release. In his only argument on appeal, Martinez

- Ramirez asserts that because the indictment did not allege his prior aggravated felony conviction,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 17, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10870 Document: 00513915851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2017No. 16

- 10870

2 his sentence, which exceeded the two

- year statutory maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), cons tituted a violation of his due process rights. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he maintains that the reasoning of this case has been called into question by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). The Government has filed a motion for a summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a merits brief. Summary affirmance is proper when, among other instances, “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). As Martinez

- Ramirez concedes, his due process argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres . Although Apprendi and Alleyne require that facts increasing the statutory maximum or minimum sentence must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt, they have preserved an exception for prior convictions. Alleyne , 133 S. Ct. at 2160

- 64 & n.1; Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489

- 90. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. Case: 16-10870 Document: 00513915851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2017
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4514]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               CONTINUING TO WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

  (Mr. JONES asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. JONES. Mr. Speaker, while home during the 3-week recess, I 
traveled 17 of 21 days, visited 15 of 19 counties that I have the 
privilege to represent, appeared on several radio talk shows, and held 
numerous town meetings.
  Overall, people are optimistic about the direction the new Congress 
is going. People believe Congress is starting to represent the working 
man and woman and passing commonsense legislation. I sincerely believe 
we are in the process of rebuilding the public's trust in Congress 
which was lost after previous Congresses neglected to listen to the 
people.
  In the next few months we will all have to make difficult choices. 
But we, as elected officials, must continue to use common sense when 
drafting, discussing, and voting on legislation. We must continue to 
work for the American people.
  Ultimately, we need to stay focused to the commitment we made with 
the American people--to again make America a great country.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22297]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/06-0332]

Main Street Capital II, LP; Notice of Exemption Under Section 312 
of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Main Street Capital II, LP, 1300 Post 
Oak Blvd, Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730 of the Small 
Business Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.730), Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest. Main 
Street Capital II, LP provided a debt/equity financing to National 
Trench Safety, LLC, 15955 West Hardy Road, Houston, TX 77060. The 
financing was made to support the growth and development of the 
company.
    The financing is brought within the purview of section 
107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Main Street Equity Interests, 
Inc., an Associate of Main Street Capital II, LP, owns more than ten 
percent of National Trench Safety, LLC.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2010-22297 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Postmedia Network Canada Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Godfrey,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Godfrey                     
|Paul Godfrey                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 27, 2013.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 9, 2003

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

No. 02-1599

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CARLAN D. HODGES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States 

District Court for the

Southern District of Illinois.

No. 99-CR-40009

Richard Mills, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued this date is hereby corrected. The district

court number in the caption incorrectly indicated a civil case and should have

been 99-CR-40009.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00325-CV

CITY OF ARLINGTON, Appellant

V.

CRAIG TAYLOR, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 96th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (096-329704-21)

October 12, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Walker

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After considering appellant’s motion for rehearing en banc of our opinion 

dated May 18, 2023, we deny the motion, but we withdraw our prior opinion and

judgment dated May 18, 2023, and substitute the following judgment.

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the
trial court is reversed, and we render a judgment dismissing Craig Taylor’s claims 

against the City.

It is further ordered that Craig Taylor shall pay all costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brain Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS  SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31,
                    1997   (UNAUDITED)   AND  THE   CONSOLIDATED   STATEMENT  OF
                    OPERATIONS  FOR  THE  THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH  31,  1997
                    (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                    SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                         0000771934
<NAME>                        Gulf Atlantic Communities Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         8,462
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 63,943 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  146,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0 <F2>
<PP&E>                                         2,802 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               246,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0 <F2>
<BONDS>                                      169,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         981
<OTHER-SE>                                    48,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 246,845
<SALES>                                       16,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              18,249
<CGS>                                         13,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (7,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (7,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (7,276)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.75)

<FN>
<F1> The values for Receivables and PP&E Represent Net Amounts.

<F2> The Company does not prepare a Classified Balance Sheet. Therefore, Current
     Assets and Current Liabilities are not applicable.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Order entered January 31, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00749
- CV
WAL
- MART STORES TEXAS, L LC, Appellant

V. DAWN BISHOP, Appellee On Appeal from the 162n d Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 00763



### O RDER
T he Court has before it appellee’s January 30, 2017 unopposed third motion for an
extension of time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee’s brief filed on or before March 1, 2017.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to set this case at issue

.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JACK ROSENMAN.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

Calendar No. 574 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2778 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling up to $10,000,000 

for information on the kidnapping and murder of James Foley and 

Steven Sotloff. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. 

NELSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling 

up to $10,000,000 for information on the kidnapping 

and murder of James Foley and Steven Sotloff. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

5 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

6 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2778 RS

1 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re2 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

3 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

4 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

5 aiding or abetting in the commission of the kidnapping 

6 and murder of James Foley or Steven Sotloff. 

7 (b) LIMITATION.—The total amount of rewards of8 fered under subsection (a) may not exceed $10,000,000, 

9 and the total amount of rewards offered in connection with 

10 the kidnapping and murder of either one of the individuals 

11 named in such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 574 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2778 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards 

Steven Sotloff. the kidnapping and murder of James Foley and totaling up to $10,000,000 for information on 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-4217
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JARON REEVEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:02-cr-00146-WDQ) Submitted: October 25, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. G. Godwin Oyewole, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Christine Manuelian, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jaron Reevey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on a witness’s affidavit purporting to recant her trial testimony. Reevey argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reevey , No. 1:02-cr-00146-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Civilian Service seeks skilled employeesPublished April 30, 2019
                        
                        By Angelina Casarez
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT-BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Civilian Service held a job fair concentrated on skilled-trade candidates April 22-23.
The event focused on filling more than 300 skilled-labored Air Force positions in the San Antonio and surrounding areas, including Altus and Laughlin Air Force Bases, Texas.
“Without a coordinated team effort with our mission partners, these job fairs wouldn’t be possible,” said Mike Brosnan, Air Force’s Personnel Center Talent Acquisition chief. “When we prepare for a job fair of this magnitude, it’s important to have AFPC talent acquisition consultants, staffing and classification teams, unit human resources liaisons, servicing civilian personnel staff and hiring managers working together.”
The event was open to the public and pre-screened more than 50 candidates who were invited to interview for positions. Overall, the event garnered more than 250 applicants with tentative job offers given to more than 80 candidates on the spot.
The Joint Base San Antonio area still has more than 1,000 open positions to fill across various occupations, with skilled trades such as aircraft maintenance and civil engineering having the most.
AFCS plans on hosting more than 80 job fairs across the United States during fiscal year 2019 and anticipates adding more than 3,000 qualified civilians to the Air Force workforce.
“Civilian employees are critical to continuity and leadership, building a lethal and ready Air Force,” Brosnan said. “The AFCS team is ready to support installation hiring requirements in order to help achieve the Air Force mission.”
To learn more about the Air Force Civilian Service, career opportunities and future events, visit https://www.afciviliancareers.com/.AFWN 



AFPC 



Air Forces Personnel Center 



civilian 



Air Force Civilian Service 



skilled 



employee 



hiring 



hire 



employment 



AF 



Air Force 



skilled trade 



job fair
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1418

HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

IMMUNEX CORPORATION

and AMGEN, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 07-

CV-780, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

2009-1182

HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GENENTECH, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-

CV-166, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN Circuit Judge.

ORDER
Genentech Inc. moves the court to treat appeal nos. 2008-1418 and 2009-1182

as companion cases. Genetech states that Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and

Immunex Corporation et al. consent.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The above-captioned appeals will be treated as

companion cases, i.e., the cases will be briefed separately and submitted to the same

merits panel.

A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to

hear these cases.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 0 6 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Robert M. Galvin, Esq.

Richard L. DeLucia, Esq.

James Galbraith, Esq.

Vernon Michael Winters, Esq.

s17

MAR 0 6 2009

All nth-16W

CLERK

2008-1418, 2009-1182	2