alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 19, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, October 19, 2010, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: September 1, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2010-22565 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly  during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

(Date)                          December 15, 2003


BY(Signature)                   /s/ Peter Porath
(Name and Title)                Peter Porath
                                President, Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEKTOR AYALA,

Appellant,

v.

JARISEL VEGA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1779

[July 12, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mariya Weekes, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE14-000918.

Susan R. Brown of Susan R. Brown, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

GERBER, J.

The father appeals from the circuit court’s final judgment on the 

father’s petition to relocate from Broward County to Palm Coast. The final 

judgment ratified a magistrate’s report which had recommended granting 

the father’s relocation petition, but changing the parties’ previously 

agreed-upon 50/50 timesharing arrangement to the mother having 

majority timesharing in Broward County.

The father primarily argues the circuit court abused its discretion in 

modifying the parties’ previously agreed-upon 50/50 timesharing, because 

the mother never filed a pleading seeking modification, and the father did 

not try the modification issue by consent, thus violating his due process 

rights. See Romero v. Brabham, 300 So. 3d 665, 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) 

(“Granting unrequested relief absent proper notice is a violation of due 

process.”) (citations omitted); Bailey v. Bailey, 227 So. 3d 768, 768 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2017) (“[W]e agree with the former wife that the trial court erred 

in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation 

for timesharing because that issue was not pled or tried by consent.”).

We disagree with the father’s argument. The record indicates the 

mother’s answer requested that she be given majority timesharing. 
2

Further, during the trial, the mother, like the father, requested majority 

timesharing. At no point during or after the trial did the father object on 

the ground that the mother had not filed a pleading requesting that she be 

given majority timesharing. So even if the mother’s answer had not 

requested that she be given majority timesharing, the father tried that 

issue by consent.

The father’s remaining arguments lack merit and do not require further 

discussion. Thus, we affirm the circuit court’s final judgment. However, 

our affirmance is without prejudice to the father filing another petition 

seeking to relocate back to Broward County and resume the parties’ 

previously agreed-upon 50/50 timesharing arrangement, as the father had 

alternatively suggested during the final hearing. We take no position on 

the merits of such a petition.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

CAE Inc. (the “Company”) isfiling with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, itsannual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the“Report”).

I, Stéphane Lefebvre, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of theU.S. Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i)                the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)              the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ StéphaneLefebvre                         

Stéphane Lefebvre

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

 

Date: June 27, 2011

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes
     $ in thousands, except per share data
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-26-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         21777
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27807
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    16735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100820
<PP&E>                                         63909
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49302
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       248
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170670
<SALES>                                        68172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          40555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (55)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4944
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3214
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .42



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6079]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Zaroff, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit34.2

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

U.S.Bank National Association

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, including the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria,that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the Platform) as of March 31,2013, and for the period from April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)–(iv),1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)–(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)–(xv), which the Companyhas determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examinationwas conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determiningwhether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicingcriteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Companyduring the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination providesa reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of March 31, 2013, andfor the period from April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

 

May 28, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 175 (Friday, September 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self Employed Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 28, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 28, 2010, at 
9 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. 
Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd 
Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22571 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         894,710                 894,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  603,470                 603,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,166,025               8,166,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,968,251               9,968,251
<PP&E>                                       2,338,682               2,338,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,470,153              20,470,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,345,763               1,345,763
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        36,603                  36,603
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,313,150              14,313,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,470,153              20,470,153
<SALES>                                      6,497,386              20,921,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,470,903              23,880,058
<CGS>                                        4,047,732              13,002,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,075,198              31,002,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,296                (25,806)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,704                 368,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,736,295)             (7,465,129)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,800                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,865,095)             (7,465,129)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.88)                  (2.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.88)                  (2.04)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>                                                                        
							

Exhibit 11

Boston Technology, Inc.
Statement of Weighted Shares used in Computation of Earnings Per Share
(in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

					    Three months ended October 31,            Nine months ended October 31, 
							  1997            1996                      1997             1996
						------------     -------------            --------------     -----------
<S>                             <C>             <C>                         <C>            <C>
Common stock outstanding, 
beginning of  period            27,296          25,033                      25,502         24,732

Weighted average common 
stock issued                        69              56                       1,135            193


Weighted average common 
stock equivalents                6,309           8,145                       6,582          7,991



Weighted average treasury 
shares acquired using 
the treasury stock method       (4,071)         (5,090)                     (4,846)        (5,093)          
					      -----------     -------------               ------------  ------------
Weighted average shares of 
common stock outstanding        29,603          28,144                      28,373         27,823
						   ===========     ==============              ============  ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDG Environmental, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, John C. Regan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ John C. ReganJohn C. Regan
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
        ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly Report of Legacy Holdings, Inc. FKA CST
        Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10QSB for the period ending December
        31, 1999, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Matthews, Chief Executive Officer and Principle
        Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
        pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company. 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
        the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
   Dated: August
        21, 2008
 
 /S/Robert
        Matthews
 Name:
        Robert Matthews
 Title: Chief
        Executive Officer and Principle Accounting Officer