alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D523]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
ADMINISTRATION'S DEFENSE BUDGET
Committee on the Budget: Held a hearing on the Administration's Defense 
Budget: Bottom Up or Belly Up? Testimony was heard from William J. 
Perry, Secretary of Defense; and Frank C. Conahan, Special Assistant to 
the Comptroller General, National Security and International Affairs 
Programs, GAO.
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Depot liaison engineers speed up aircraft repair process

              - Published  April 15, 2019
              -                             By Tech. Sgt. Jocelyn A. Ford                                                    
              - 380th AEW/PA

**AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates (AFNS) --  **
The 380th Expeditionary Maintenance Group hosts one of only five Depot Liaison Engineer positions within the Air Force Central Command area of responsibility.“I have a pretty boring job if there are no aircraft broken – which is fine, we accept that.” said 1st Lt. M. Rebecca Kretzer, AFCENT DLE and sustainment engineer.The DLE turns aircraft maintenance-speak into engineer-speak. When a plane breaks beyond what is covered in the technical orders for repair, the maintenance unit reaches out to the DLE. That is when things get busy for whomever is in that position.“I have 24/7 comms with the engineers back stateside,” Kretzer said. “I am here to help speed up the process to get our jets back to the fight as fast as possible.”She reaches back to program engineers who work specifically with whatever aircraft is having the issue. Those engineers design a fix and authorize the unit down range to execute the repair.“The benefit to having me here is, I have personal relationships with a lot of the engineers. I know them from back home.” she said. “I have conversations with them beyond what a maintainer would be able to so I can get answers faster.”Without someone holding DLE positions, the jets would be down a lot longer.Though the primary reason for having a sustainment engineer in the area of responsibility is to serve as a DLE, they do hold a secondary purpose. If there is battle damage to an aircraft elsewhere in the AOR, they forward deploy. Once forward deployed, the DLE then creates from scratch, doing math by hand, to create the structural repairs.“When you look at a technical order it says you need a patch ‘this size and with this many rivets.’ We actually go through and hand calculate everything. How many rivets you will need, how many rows.” Kretzer said.The engineers attend a two-week training course to learn about the nine-step process of Air Battle Damage Repair, along with approximately 300 hours of training to be qualified.“We learn how to make pulleys, we learn how to do hydraulic fixes, patch work, shoot rivets, that kind of stuff,” Kretzer said. “Then we do an assessor course which is aircraft specific. We learn how to actually assess the damage and create the repairs.”Having the expertise and reach back the DLE position holds, maintainers can proceed with repairs in as little as 15 minutes after putting in a request.“The fastest turn I’ve had is about 15 minutes.” Kretzer said. “Usually we can have them within 24 hours, depending on if it has to go through multiple engineers.”

AFWN380th Expeditionary Maintenance GroupDepot Liaison EngineerDLEAir Force Central Commandsustainment engineeraircraft maintenanceAir Battle Damage Repairforward deploymaintainers
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Kirk Blosch, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of OCIS Corp.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: April 14, 2003

By: /s/
   --------------------------------
   Kirk Blosch
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2596 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish Federal criminal penalties 

for interstate child endangerment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2014 

Mr. WALSH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish Federal 

criminal penalties for interstate child endangerment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERSTATE CHILD ENDANGERMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 110A of title 18, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2261A 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘§ 2261B. Interstate child endangerment 

8 ‘‘(a) OFFENSES.— 

9 ‘‘(1) TRAVEL OR CONDUCT OF OFFENDER.—It 

10 shall be unlawful for any person who travels in intermstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2596 IS

1 state or foreign commerce or enters or leaves Indian 

2 country or is present within the special maritime 

3 and territorial jurisdiction of the United States to 

4 purposely, knowingly, or negligently cause substan5 tial risk of death or serious bodily injury to a child 

6 by— 

7 ‘‘(A) placing the child in the physical cus8 tody of another individual who the person 

9 knows has previously purposely or knowingly 

10 caused bodily injury to a child; or 

11 ‘‘(B) operating a motor vehicle under the 

12 influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, in 

13 violation of the law of the State in which the 

14 motor vehicle is being operated, while the child 

15 is in the motor vehicle. 

16 ‘‘(2) CAUSING TRAVEL OF VICTIM.—It shall be 

17 unlawful for any person to cause a child to travel in 

18 interstate or foreign commerce or to enter or leave 

19 Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud 

20 and in the course of, as a result of, or to facilitate 

21 such conduct or travel, to commit or attempt to 

22 commit an offense under paragraph (1). 

23 ‘‘(b) PENALTIES.—A person who commits an offense 

24 under subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $50,000, 

25 imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 2596 IS

1 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

2 ‘‘(1) the term ‘child’ means an individual who 

3 has not attained 14 years of age; and 

4 ‘‘(2) the term ‘controlled substances’ has the 

5 meaning given the term in section 102 of the Con6 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802).’’. 

7 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of section for 

8 chapter 110A of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

9 by inserting after the item relating to section 2261A the 

10 following: 

‘‘2261B. Interstate child endangerment.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 83093 

FILE 

No. 83267 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF 

DARREL D. SMITH, DECEASED. 

SUN H. HOLDEN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

GERRARD COX LARSEN, 

Respondent. 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF 

DARREL D. SMITH, DECEASED. 

SUN H. HOLDEN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

GERRARD COX LARSEN, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 83267 AND 

REINSTATING BRIEFING 

Docket No. 83093 is an appeal from an order adjudicating and 

enforcing an attorney's lien and compelling partial distribution of the 

estate. Docket No. 83267 is an appeal from a postjudgment order denying a 

motion for rehearing and reconsideration of that same order. Eighth 

Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge. 

Because this court has consistently held that no appeal lies 

from an order denying a motion for reconsideration, this court entered an 

order directing appellant to show cause why the appeal in Docket No. 83267 

should not be dismissed. Appellant has responded and argues that under 

this court's decision in AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 

245 P.3d 1190 (2010), this court should consider the motion to be appealable 

as a tolling motion. This court does consider the motion to be a timely filed 

1---34 338 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0ilLl7A.95/46m, 

3 . - - „ 

- ::" 
tolling motion, and therefore, the notice of appeal in Docket No. 83093 from 

the original order adjudicating and enforcing the attorney lien and 

compelling partial distribution of estate, filed after the filing of the motion 

for reconsideration but before this court dismissed the appeal as premature, 

is timely pursuant to NRAP 4(a)(6). However, that does not equate to the 

order denying reconsideration being independently appealable. See Arnold 

v. Kip, 123 Nev. 410, 417, 168 P.3d 1050, 1054 (2007) ([A]n order denying 

reconsideration is not appealable."), disapproved of on other grounds by AA 

Primo Builders). The appeal in Docket No. 83267 is dismissed. This appeal 

will proceed as to Docket No. 83093, and the briefing schedule is reinstated 

as follows. 

Appellant shall have 60 days from the date of this order to file 

and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed 

in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 

It is so ORDERED. 

914001baa ll.."71 J. 

arraguirre 

 J. 

Stiglich 

cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge 

Eleissa C. Lavelle, Settlement Judge 

Law Office of George E. Cromer 

Gerrard Cox Larsen 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

J. 

Silver 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) POO?. aggro 

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E927]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      NATIONAL PROPANE SAFETY WEEK

                                 ______

                        HON. W.J. (BILLY) TAUZIN

                              of louisiana

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. TAUZIN. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to bring to the attention of my 
colleagues the fact that for over 70 years, the propane gas industry 
has been making significant contributions to American life with 
remarkable degrees of dependability, efficiency, and above all safety.
  To highlight the industry's sincere concern with safety, the National 
Propane Gas Association sponsors National Propane Safety Week, which is 
being held this year from May 1-5. The Safety Awareness Week will 
include safety demonstrations and anti-tampering messages as well as 
helpful tips on using gas grills, handling cylinders for recreational 
vehicles, what to do if a homeowner smells gas, and how to handle a 
pilot light that won't light.
  All across the country, manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors 
regularly help in educating the over 60 million consumers of propane on 
the sage use of this gas. Consumers use this common fuel to heat their 
homes, and barns, dry their crops, and fuel their vehicles and 
machinery. National Propane Safety Week will play an important role in 
reinforcing the safety education of those who already have access to 
this pertinent information, as well as in making it available to those 
who do not.
  A home safety audit, called Gas Check, is another initiative strongly 
recommended by the National Propane Gas Association throughout Safety 
Week. Celebrating its 10th anniversary this year, Gas Check 
stresses consumer education, and after a thorough examination of 
operation of propane appliances. This kind of attention to the safety 
needs of consumers should not go unrecognized or unappreciated.
  Mr. Speaker, I would like to stress my support for all of the propane 
dealers in my district who put safety first, and I encourage my 
colleagues to do the same. I would also like to personally commend the 
National Propane Gas Association and its constituent dealers for their 
efforts to promote public awareness about propane safety issues through 
their sponsorship of and participation in National Propane Safety Week.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 276 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 276

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12423, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section, reinstate the 
license and extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of project works to the end of 
the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate June 19, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 276

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Technologies to Reduce Health Disparities SBIR 2011/01.                    

*Date:*                         November 3, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ruixia Zhou, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Democracy Two Building, Suite 957, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-4773,                         *zhour@mail.nih.gov*.                    

                        Dated:                        **                         September 1, 2010.                    

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-22329 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of the registrant on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  March 29, 2004                 By:       /s/ Stephen H. Wacknitz
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stephen H. Wacknitz
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Temecula Valley
Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Corlies *v.*Delaplaine.

A motion to strike irrelevant or redundant matter out of a pleading, will not be granted, where the party before moving, answers or replies to such pleading.

January 15, 1850.

Motion to strike irrelevant matter out of an answer. It appeared that before moving, the plaintiff had replied to the answer.

*M. Porter,*for the plaintiff.

*J. F. Delaplaine, Jr.,*for the defendant.

Sandford, J.,

after advising with Oakley, Ch. J., and Paine, J., denied the motion, because the plaintiff had put in a reply *681before he gave notice of his application. He said it was deemed best to require the party to object promptly, to matter alleged to be redundant or irrelevant; and answering the pleading should be considered as a waiver of such objection.

Motion denied.
**Exhibit 99.9**

**LETTER OF CONSENT**

Reference is made to the technical report dated December 6, 2013with an effective date of October 23, 2013, entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Pre-Feasibility of the Strange Lake Property, Quebec, Canada”(the “**Technical Report**”) which the undersigned has prepared in part for Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. (the “**Corporation**”). 

I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and the extracts from, or summaries of, the Technical Report, in the Corporation’s Annual Information Form datedJanuary 24, 2014 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, which is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F, including all exhibits, of the Corporation, which is being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission. 

Yours very truly, 

*(signed) William J. Lewis*

William J. Lewis, B. Sc., P.Eng. 

Senior Geologist 

Micon International Limited

Dated: January 29, 2014
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4516]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          TRIBUTE TO JOHN JOSEPH NOVABILSKI, AN AMERICAN HERO

  (Mr. WYNN asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WYNN. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize a fallen hero. On Monday, 
May 1, in Prince Georges County, MD, we buried Police Corporal John 
Joseph Novabilski, known as ``Nova.''
  Corporal Novabilski was killed in uniform while sitting in his 
cruiser working as an off-duty security guard. Allegedly, following an 
earlier argument, his assailant walked up from behind and shot 
Novabilski 11 times.
  Officer Novabilski first joined the Prince Georges police force in 
1988. He took his job as an officer of the law seriously, and sought 
duty in high crime areas. He was also compassionate, using his own 
money to buy toys for poor youngsters in the neighborhood. His fellow 
officers knew him for his big, warm smile and good humored griping.
  At the funeral, a friend, Kirk Mullings, described Corporal 
Novabilski as a good man who wanted nothing more than to fall in love 
with a good woman, have many good friends, and do the job he loved.
  On behalf of the citizens of Prince Georges County and the State of 
Maryland, I want to say to his wife, Karen, and his family that we 
appreciate what John did to help our community and we'll long remember 
his efforts. May God rest his soul. John Joseph Novabilski, American 
hero.

                          ____________________
```