alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 DoD CI, HUMINT awards showcase OSI excellencePublished Aug. 6, 2019
                        
                        By Wayne Amann
                        
                        
                        AFOSI Public Affairs
                **QUANTICO, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Office of Special Investigations earned eight awards out of 18 categories during the Department of Defense Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Awards held at separate DoD and national ceremonies in the National Capital Region July 30 and 31.
“That’s an amazing testament to the caliber of effort our teammates contributed to AFOSI’s counterintelligence mission, the Air Force and the DoD at large throughout the year,” wrote Brig. Gen. Terry L. Bullard, AFOSI commander, in announcing the news to the OSI team. “Performance STILL matters! We are proud of your well-deserved recognition and thankful for your dedication.”
OSI earned awards in these DoD CI and HUMINT Enterprise categories:
CI Investigation (Team)
CI Individual Countering Technical & Cyber Threats (Individual)
CI Individual Countering Technical & Cyber Threats (Team)
CI Analysis and Production (Individual)
Training and Education (Individual)
CI Collections (Individual)
CI Supply Chain Risk Protect (Team)
CI Credibility Assessment (Individual)
Meanwhile, OSI garnered five more awards during the Intelligence Community National Counterintelligence and Security Professional Awards competition.
OSI won in these categories:
CI Analysis (Team)
CI Collection (Individual)
CI Operations (Team)
Countering Technical and Cyber Threats (Individual)
Education and Training (Team)
The competitions were judged by selection panels consisting of senior subject matter experts from across the DoD and National CI, HUMINT and security communities respectively, representing decades of experience.DOD 



OSI 



Air Force Office of Special Investigations 



HUMINT 



CI 



AFOSI 



DoD Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Awards 



AF 



Air Force 



award 



recognition 



competition 



AFWN
#### HENRY MAH, JR. v. FRANCIS PERILLO.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Dec. 9Published Dec. 9, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James speaks at the Reagan National Defense Forum, the Air Force releases F-35A Lightning II candidate bases, and Operation Christmas Drop is underway. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- Air Force releases candidate installations for next F-35A bases
- Operation Christmas Drop begins at GuamF-35 



SecAF 



Guam 



PACAF 



Operation Christmas Drop 



Andersen AFB 



James 



ATAF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED W ILLIAM BROWNING , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 344 LT Case No. 16

- 2007

- CF

- 13721A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed January 24 , 20 23 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County , Jeb Branham , Judge. William Browning, Wewahitchka, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorne y G ener al, and Davi d Welch, Assistan t Attorney Ge neral, Tallahassee, for A ppellee.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J., JAY and SOUD , JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3RD QUARTER
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997             APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0               8,738,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0             116,878,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0              20,151,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0             149,478,551
<PP&E>                                               0             114,846,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0             518,566,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0             186,674,088
<BONDS>                                              0             110,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0               3,322,175
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0             201,214,036
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0             518,566,777
<SALES>                                    109,431,604             297,574,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           109,431,604             297,574,404
<CGS>                                       26,477,895              77,090,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,477,895              77,090,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            66,059,191             176,054,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,649,048               9,214,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,245,470              35,214,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,979,163              13,321,666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,266,307              21,893,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,266,307              21,893,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.31                   $0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.30                   $0.81
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2601 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2601

   To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to ensure futures commission 
                          merchant compliance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2014

  Mr. Roberts (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to ensure futures commission 
                          merchant compliance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Risk Hedging Protection Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANT COMPLIANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 4d(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 
U.S.C. 6d(a)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and indenting 
        appropriately;
            (2) by striking ``Sec. 4d'' and all that follows through 
        ``It shall be unlawful'' and inserting the following:
    ``Sec. 4d. Dealing by Unregistered Futures Commission Merchants or 
Introducing Merchants Prohibited.
    ``(a) Registration Requirements and Duties.--
            ``(1) In general.--It shall be unlawful''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Residual interest requirement.--Any rules or 
        regulations requiring a futures commission merchant to maintain 
        a residual interest in accounts held for the benefit of 
        customers in amounts at least sufficient to exceed the sum of 
        all uncollected margin deficits of the customers shall provide 
        that a futures commission merchant shall meet the residual 
        interest requirement as of the end of each business day 
        calculated as of the close of business on the previous business 
        day.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4d of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6d) 
        is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b), by striking ``paragraph (2) 
                of this section'' and inserting ``subsection 
                (a)(1)(B)''; and
                    (B) in subsection (h), by striking 
                ``Notwithstanding subsection (a)(2)'' and inserting 
                ``Notwithstanding subsection (a)(1)(B)''.
            (2) Section 15(c)(3)(C) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(c)(3)(C)) is amended by striking 
        ``4d(a)(2)'' and inserting ``4d(a)(1)(B)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### McGehee *v.*Road Improvement District No. 2.

Opinion delivered July 10, 1922.

Highways — abandonment of plans — effect on pending appeal.— Where, under Road Laws 1919, No. 202, establishing a road improvement district, the county court approved the commissioners’ plans over the protest of a property owner, who appealed, and subsequently those plans were abandoned, and new plans were filed and approved without objection, the property owner could not object to the new plans on his appeal.

Appeal.from Desha Circuit Court; *W. B. Sorrels,*Judge;

affirmed.

*Abner McGehee,*for appellant.

*Coleman, Robinson & House,*for appellee.

McCulloch, C. J.

Road Improvement District No. 2 of Desha County was created by act No. 202 of the General Assembly of 1919 for the purpose of improving certain roads in Desha County, the roads being designated numerically, and subdistricts, or sections, being created for the purpose of improving each of the roads. The commissioners filed plans with the county court for the improvements in accordance with the directions of the statute, and appellant, who is the owner of real property in the district, appeared before that court for *443the purpose of protesting against the approval of the plans with respect to section No. 5. There was a hearing before the county court and the plans were approved, and appellant prosecuted an appeal to the circuit court.

The order of approval was entered by the county court on February 26,1920, but the General Assembly, at the extraordinary session in February, 1920, enacted a special statute, which was approved February 20, 1920, amending the former statute with regard to section or subdistrict No. 5, and the order of the county court was not in conformity with the amendatory statute. While the matter was pending in the circuit court on the appeal of this appellant, the county court and the commissioners took cognizance of the change in the law, and the commissioners abandoned the former plans which had been approved by the county court and filed new plans in, regard to the road in section 5. The county court approved these plans, and there was no appeal prosecuted from the order of approval. Thereafter, the circuit court heard the cause upon the appeal and decided that the plans then before that court had been abandoned, and for that reason the litigation inaugurated on appellant’s protest was at an end.

The court was correct in this conclusion for the reason that the plans about which the controversy arose in the county court had been abandoned, and there was nothing to litigate concerning those plans. If appellant had any objection to the adoption of the new plans, his remedy was to appear in the county court and make his objection there. He seeks now to make objection to the approval of the new plans, but he cannot do so in this proceeding.

Affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH L. RANSOME.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Order filed November 29, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00603

- CV

____________ WILLIAM H. POFF AND JULIA A. POFF , Appellant s
V.
CYPRESS FOUR PROPERT Y VENTURES LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C16

- 049



### ORDER
This appeal is from a judgment signed May 23, 2016 . Appellant s filed a notice of appeal on May 31, 2016

. On September 28, 2016, a ppellant s filed a motion for enforcement of their affidavit of indigence filed in the trial court

. On October 12 , 2016, the trial court filed a partial clerk’s record which
demonstrated appellants filed an affidavit of indigence and were found indigent after a hearing

. On November 1, 2016, this court granted appellants’ motio n for2

enforcement

. Therefore, appellants are deemed indigent and may proceed without payment of costs on appeal

. Accordingly, the Waller County Clerk is directed to file the clerk ’s record within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Academy awarded accreditation until 2028-2029Published Aug. 9, 2019
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Charles Rivezzo
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs
                **U.S. Air Force Academy, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Academy officials recently announced the results of the institution’s academic accreditation from the Higher Learning Commission.
The final report from the HLC found the university met all of the criteria for accreditation and federal compliance requirements without comments, reaffirming its accredited status until the 2028-2029 academic year.
“This is the best possible outcome for an academic institution and is exactly what we wanted out of this review,” said Lt. Gen. Jay Silveria, Air Force Academy superintendent. “This is the result of great work and strong partnerships over the years leading into this evaluation.”
According to Col. Daniel Uribe, the Foreign Languages department head and lead for the Academy’s accreditation effort, the accreditation process is intended to address four main areas: verify that the institution meets higher education standards; promote institutional self-knowledge and continual advancement in the quality of higher education; provide assurance to the public regarding the quality of higher education; and build and maintain confidence in higher education across the nation.
Traditionally, there are three different paths an academic institution can follow for accreditation or affirmation of accredited status. The Academy chose what’s known as the Open Pathway, which requires an on-site visit by the HLC every 10 years.
Uribe noted that only institutions that meet all standards without comment during the evaluation may choose the Open Pathway route.
The Academy also received multiple accolades about the quality of the institution from the Peer Review Team during the visit and in the final report.
“I was fortunate to lead a team of professionals from across the institution to include the Dean of Faculty, Athletic Department, Cadet Wing and Headquarters, in preparing for this important event,” Uribe said. “Their hard work clearly paid off with the results we received.”
Silveria echoed Uribe’s sentiment, but extended distinct praise to the efforts from those within the Dean of Faculty.
“While this accreditation represents the work of the entire institution, it is clear the faculty played the largest role in achieving this outcome,” he said. “I am exceptionally proud of our faculty for this work and what they do every day.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Higher Learning Commission 



HLC 



Accreditation 



federal compliance requirements 



Air Force Academy 



accredited status 



higher education standards 



promote institutional self-knowledge 



continual advancement
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2542 

To clarify the effect of State statutes of repose on the required commencement 

date for actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2014 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To clarify the effect of State statutes of repose on the 

required commencement date for actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act of 1980. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACTIONS UNDER STATE LAW FOR DAMAGES 

4 FROM EXPOSURE TO HAZARDOUS SUB5 STANCES. 

6 Section 309 of the Comprehensive Environmental Re7 sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 

8 U.S.C. 9658) is amended— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2542 IS

1 (1) in the subsection heading of subsection (a), 

2 by inserting ‘‘AND REPOSE’’ after ‘‘STATUTES OF

3 LIMITATIONS’’; and 

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘or repose’’ after ‘‘limitations’’ 

5 each of the other places it appears. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SCWC-11-0000802
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

_________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. RUBIN IKOA CASUGAY-BADIANG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000802; CR. NO. 11-1-0523)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Acob a, McKenn a, and Po llack, JJ ., with R ecktenwal d, C.J., dissentin g separat ely, with whom Nak ayama, J. joins) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, filed on June 19, 2013, is corrected as follows:

On page 31, the attorney caption shall read: “Ronette M. Kawakami (Summer M. M. Kupau with her on the briefs) for petitioner”
The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

An amended opinion of the court will be filed contemporaneously with this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 28, 2013. /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000802 28-JUN-2013 10:12 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000771677
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-B LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         390,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,803
<PP&E>                                       4,110,288
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,474,282)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,027,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,291
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,737,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,027,809
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               341,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            201,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,808
<EPS-BASIC>                                      30.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    30.10



</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Nominations sought for 2018 AFA Verne Orr AwardPublished Oct. 23, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alexx Pons
                        
                        
                        Air Force's Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials are currently accepting nominations for the 2018 Air Force Association Verne Orr Award. 
The AFA established this award in honor of former Secretary of the Air Force Verne Orr to recognize mission-oriented accomplishments and achievements by units that made the most effective use of human resources.
The nomination window is open through Jan. 5, 2018, to all Air Force units regardless of size. The accomplishments should be mission-oriented and focus on how the unit excelled in its use of personnel to achieve full potential and accomplish its mission. 
Organizations and base-level personnel should contact their major command, combatant command, field operating agency or direct reporting unit for local suspense dates. 
Specific eligibility and application procedures are available via myPers. Select “any” from the dropdown menu and search “Verne.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to **myPers**. Individuals who do not have a **myPers** account can request one by following the instructions on the **Air Forces Personnel Center** website.Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force Association 



AFA 



AETC 



AF 



Air Education and Training Command 



joint base 



Air Forces Personnel Center 



2018 Air Force Association Verne Orr Award 



Berne Orr Award 



JB San Antonio-Randolph
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEITH ADAMS.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.