alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         100,798
<SECURITIES>                                   110,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                  690,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               993,690
<PP&E>                                      23,897,431
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,698,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,462,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,289,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        576
<COMMON>                                         1,027
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,949,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,462,883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,261,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  971,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               912,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             381,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,006,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,006,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,006,330)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 2, 2014 between Communications
Infrastructure Investments, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CII”) and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Zayo” and collectively with CII, the “Company”) and Daniel P.
Caruso (the “Executive”) (each of the foregoing individually a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”). 

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Executive’s Employment Agreement dated February 15, 2014
(“Agreement”) consistent with the terms contained herein. The Company’s Compensation Committee has reviewed and approved the terms and conditions contained herein. 

1. Cash Compensation. 
 Cash
Compensation. Contingent upon the completion of the Company’s IPO, and effective November 1, 2014, the Executive’s base salary shall be changed from a rate of $400,000.00 per annum to a rate of $17,500.00 per annum, which shall be
paid in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company (the “Base Salary”). 
 2. Equity Compensation Awards. 

Grant of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). Contingent upon the completion of the Company’s IPO, and effective
November 1, 2014, the Company shall grant to Executive a quantity of RSUs that equates to an aggregate value of $2,750,000.00 on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment, the Executive’s Employment Agreement dated
February 15, 2014, and consistent with the Company’s Part A RSU program. Such RSUs shall be subject to a four (4) quarter vesting term and shall vest on December 31, 2015 (provided the subject IPO occurs on or before
December 31, 2014). 
  

			
	Executive
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Daniel P. Caruso

		 	Daniel P. Caruso
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Ken desGarennes

	Name:	 	Ken desGarennes
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE OF THE WILL OF BERNARD NASSANO, DECEASED.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Wright-Patterson AFB opens cyber defense facilityPublished July 15, 2019
                        
                        By Brian Brackens
                        
                        
                        Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                During a ribbon cutting ceremony at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, July 9, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Fighters and Bombers Directorate officially opened a new $1.5 million facility essential to protecting weapon systems from cyber threats and mitigating cyber vulnerabilities across the Air Force fighters and bombers fleet.
One of the Air Force’s ongoing challenges is to create processes, infrastructure and capabilities to counter threats to its weapon systems. To address this, organizations are looking at creative ways to forge partnerships and alliances to advance the cyber resiliency of weapon systems by protecting information and eliminating communications barriers.
The facility is the result of a partnership with the Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapons Systems or CROWS, which provided funding and expertise for the project.
The new work area will provide a collaborative space for acquisition professionals to learn about current and emerging threats and better protect against them.
“Construction of this facility is a key component of the CROWS mission to increase the cyber resiliency of Air Force weapon systems and maintain mission effective capability,” said Joseph Bradley, CROWS director. “It will improve communication, collaboration and allow us to better resolve problems.”
“We are in an age where we have a very sophisticated threat and an adversary that is really trying to get into all of our systems,” said Brig. Gen. Heath Collins, Fighters and Bombers, program executive officer. “This facility is absolutely going to be at the core of how we protect our systems moving forward.”
Over the next five years, CROWS anticipates establishing similar facilities across development, acquisition and sustainment centers, which will serve to underscore the organization’s commitment to its overarching mission of increasing the cyber resiliency of weapon systems.FS 



Wright-Patterson AFB 



Air Force Base 



Air Force Materiel Command 



AFMC 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



AFLCMC 



Fighters and Bombers Directorate 



cyber 



threats 



Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapons Systems 



CROWS 



AF 



Air Force
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan of Occupational Health + Rehabilitation
Inc of our report dated March 27, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
April 24, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2541

 To allow additional appointing authorities to select individuals from 
                   competitive service certificates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2014

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow additional appointing authorities to select individuals from 
                   competitive service certificates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Competitive Service Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL APPOINTING AUTHORITIES FOR COMPETITIVE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 3317 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at end the following:
    ``(c) Other Appointing Authorities.--
            ``(1) In general.--During the 240-day period beginning on 
        the date of issuance of a certificate of eligibles under 
        subsection (a), an appointing authority other than the 
        appointing authority requesting the certificate may select an 
        individual from that certificate in accordance with paragraph 
        (2) for an appointment to a position that is--
                    ``(A) in the same occupational series as the 
                position for which the certification of eligibles was 
                issued (in this subsection referred to as the `original 
                position'); and
                    ``(B) at a similar grade level as the original 
                position.
            ``(2) Requirements.--The selection of an individual under 
        paragraph (1)--
                    ``(A) shall be made in accordance with this 
                subchapter; and
                    ``(B) may be made without any additional posting 
                under section 3327.
            ``(3) Applicability.--An appointing authority requesting a 
        certificate of eligibles may share the certificate with another 
        appointing authority only if the announcement of the original 
        position provided notice that the resulting list of eligible 
        candidates may be used by another appointing authority.
            ``(4) Collective bargaining obligations.--Nothing in this 
        subsection limits any collective bargaining obligation of an 
        agency under chapter 71.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall 
issue regulations to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### STANLEY YOKA v. HAZEL MCGLORY.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### John W. YOUNG, Commissioner of Labor, etc., Appellant, v. Cecil BARTLEY et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 22, 1971.

Gemma M. Harding, Dept, of Labor, Louisville, for appellant.

Harry R. Stamper, Kelsey E. Friend Law Firm, Pikeville, for Cecil Bartley.

Fred G. Francis, Prestonsburg, for Island Creek Coal Co.

NEIKIRK, Judge.

Cecil Bartley, a 51-year-old coal miner, sustained an injury to the lower region of his back as he was lifting a heavy timber while employed by Island Creek Coal Company. Some three months after the injury he returned to work in the mine but was unable to perform the heavy work that his job entailed. Bartley filed a claim with the Workmen’s Compensation Board seeking compensation for his injury. The Special Fund was made a party.

The Board awarded Bartley compensation for a three-month period of temporary total disability and for 50% permanent partial disability, to be paid by the employer. The Board dismissed the claim against the Special Fund.

The employer, Island Creek Coal Company, appealed to the Floyd Circuit Court, which reversed the Board and remanded the case with directions to enter an order holding the employer liable for compensation only for temporary total disability, and holding the Special Fund liable for compensation for permanent total disability. The Special Fund appeals.

There was medical evidence that Bart-ley’s injury had aroused a pre-existing dormant arthritic condition into disabling reality. The circuit court imposed liability on the Special Fund on the theory that the arthritic condition was a dormant, nondis-abling “disease.” The Board found from all the evidence that Bartley had a condition pre-existing the accident which was nondisabling and that the condition was degenerative arthritis. Degenerative arthritis is a degenerative process brought on by the normal aging process and normal wear and tear. Degenerative arthritis is defined in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary as: “arthritis of middle age characterized by degenerative and sometimes hy-pertrophic changes in the bone and cartilage of one or more joints and a progressive wearing down of apposing joint surfaces with consequent distortion of joint posi*263tion.” Degenerative arthritis is not a disease within the meaning of KRS 342.120. Such condition falls within the same category as the degenerative disc condition encountered in Young v. City Bus Company, Ky., 450 S.W.2d 510. See Central Uniform Rentals v. Richburg, Ky., 468 S.W. 2d 268; Young v. SouthEast Coal Company, Inc., Ky., 468 S.W.2d 316.

The judgment is reversed, with directions that the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board be affirmed.

All concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5559]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              NOMINATIONS

  Executive nominations received by the Senate April 7, 1995:
                              in the army

       The following named officer for reappointment to the grade 
     of general while assigned to a position of importance and 
     responsibility under title 10, United States Code, sections 
     601(a) and 3033:

                       chief of staff of the army

                             To be general

Gen. Dennis J. Reimer, 000-00-0000

                          ____________________
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 29, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00299

- CV

IN RE Douglas C. GLENEWINKEL and Ward A. Glenewinkel , Relator(s)

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On July 26, 2021, r elators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief, which this court granted on July 29, 2021. The real parties in interest filed a response to which relators replied. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators did not show they are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus

is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

The stay issued on July 29, 2021 is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on September 29, 2021

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of September, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21

- 0921

- CV

- E , styled Douglas C. Glenewinkel and Ward. A. Glenewinkel v. Marvin W. Kraft, Jr., Jeffrey Marvin Kraft and Craig W. Hall , pending in the 456th District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Heather H. Wright presiding.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. IN09-9-000]

On January 15, 2009, the Commission issued an order in the above-captioned docket designating, with certain listed exceptions, the staff of the Office of Enforcement's Division of Investigations (DOI) as non-decisional staff in deliberations by the Commission in this docket.

By this order, the Commission amends the January 15, 2009 notice to add Larry Gasteiger, Deputy Director, Office of Enforcement to the non-decisional staff in this docket. The Commission also adds Norman Bay, Director, Office of Enforcement, Larry Parkinson, Director, DOI, and Geof Hobday of DOI to the January 15, 2009 list of staff excepted from the DOI non-decisional staff designation.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010-22513 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 18, 2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 18, 2011 through
December 31, 2011, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ James
Fehleison             |  |  |  | Dated: March 29, 2012
|                                     |  | James Fehleison                 |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Kevin N. McGrath, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; b. (Intentionally omitted); c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         /s/ Kevin N. McGrath   Kevin N. McGrath   President and Chief Executive  Officer   Dated: May 14, 2007