Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices 54657 

CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives 

notice of its intent to grant an exclusive 

license in the United States to practice 

the inventions described and claimed in 

U.S. Patent Applications corresponding 

to NASA Case Nos. ARC–14744–2 

entitled ‘‘A Versatile Platform for 

Nanotechnology Based on Circular 

Permutations of Chaperonin Protein,’’ 

and ARC–15981–1 entitled 

‘‘Chaperonin-Based Templates for 

Pseudo-Cellulosomes’’ to Conderos, Inc., 

having its principal place of business at 

830 Garland Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94303. 

Patent rights in this invention have been 

assigned to the United States of America 

as represented by the Administrator of 

the National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration. The prospective 

exclusive license will comply with the 

terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 

and 37 CFR 404.7. 

DATES: The prospective exclusive 

license may be granted unless, within 

fifteen (15) days from the date of this 

published notice, NASA receives 

written objections including evidence 

and argument that establish that the 

grant of the license would not be 

consistent with the requirements of 35 

U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 

Competing applications completed and 

received by NASA within fifteen (15) 

days of the date of this published notice 

will also be treated as objections to the 

grant of the contemplated exclusive 

license. 

Objections submitted in response to 

this notice will not be made available to 

the public for inspection and, to the 

extent permitted by law, will not be 

released under the Freedom of 

Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. 

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the 

prospective license may be submitted to 

Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, 

NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 

202A–4, Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000. 

(650) 604–5104; Fax (650) 604–2767. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert M. Padilla, Chief Patent Counsel, 

Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Ames 

Research Center, Mail Stop 202A–4, 

Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000. (650) 

604–5104; Fax (650) 604–2767. 

Information about other NASA 

inventions available for licensing can be 

found online at http:// 

technology.nasa.gov/. 

Dated: September 1, 2010. 

Richard W. Sherman, 

Deputy General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22390 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION 

SAFETY BOARD 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

Agenda 

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, 

September 28, 2010. 

PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429 

L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 

20594. 

STATUS: The ONE item is open to the 

public. 

Matters To Be Considered 

8157A Highway Accident Report— 

Truck-Tractor Semitrailer Rear-End 

Collision Into Passenger Vehicles on 

Interstate 44, Near Miami, Oklahoma, 

June 26, 2009. 

News Media Contact: Telephone: 

(202) 314–6100. 

The press and public may enter the 

NTSB Conference Center one hour prior 

to the meeting for set up and seating. 

Individuals requesting specific 

accommodations should contact 

Rochelle Hall at (202) 314–6305 by 

Friday, September 24, 2010. 

The public may view the meeting via 

a live or archived webcast by accessing 

a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the 

NTSB home page at http:// 

www.ntsb.gov. 

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Candi 

Bing, (202) 314–6403. 

Friday, September 3, 2010. 

Candi R. Bing, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22549 Filed 9–3–10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7533–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–083; NRC–2010–0293] 

University of Florida; University of 

Florida Training Reactor; 

Environmental Assessment and 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC or the Commission) 

is considering issuance of a renewed 

Facility Operating License No. R–56, to 

the University of Florida (the licensee), 

which would authorize continued 

operation of the University of Florida 

Training Reactor (UFTR) located in 

Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida. 

Therefore, as required by Title 10 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 

51.21, the NRC is issuing this 

Environmental Assessment and Finding 

of No Significant Impact. 

Environmental Assessment 

Identification of the Proposed Action: 

The proposed action would renew 

Facility Operating License No. R–56 for 

a period of 20 years from the date of 

issuance of the renewed license. The 

proposed action is in accordance with 

the licensee’s application dated July 18, 

2002, as supplemented by letters dated 

July 25, July 29, and July 31, 2002, 

February 25, 2003, August 8, 2006, 

February 2, 2007, April 7 and November 

26, 2008, September 28 and October 20, 

2009, and February 26, March 11, March 

26, May 3, and June 1, 2010. In 

accordance with 10 CFR 2.109, the 

existing license remains in effect until 

the NRC takes final action on the 

renewal application. 

Need for the Proposed Action: 

The proposed action is needed to 

allow the continued operation of the 

UFTR to routinely provide teaching, 

research, and services to numerous 

institutions for a period of 20 years. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Proposed Action: 

The NRC staff has completed its draft 

safety evaluation of the proposed action 

to issue a renewed Facility Operating 

License No. R–56 to allow continued 

operation of the UFTR for a period of 20 

years and tentatively concludes there is 

reasonable assurance that the UFTR will 

continue to operate safely for the 

additional period of time. The details of 

the NRC staff’s final safety evaluation 

will be provided with the renewed 

license that will be issued as part of the 

letter to the licensee approving its 

license renewal application. This 

document contains the environmental 

assessment of the proposed action. 

The UFTR is located in the Nuclear 

Reactor Building in the northeast 

quadrant of the University of Florida 

campus, approximately 1600 meters (1 

mile) southwest of downtown 

Gainesville, Florida. Gainesville is 

located in the approximate center of 

Alachua County, which covers 975 

square miles in the north-central part of 

Florida about midway between the Gulf 

of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean. The 

reactor is housed in a vault-type 

building which serves as a confinement. 

The Nuclear Reactor Building and its 

annex, the Nuclear Sciences Center, are 

located in an area with laboratory and 

classroom buildings comprising the 

College of Engineering and the College 

of Journalism. The nearest permanent 

residence is the East Hall Housing 

facility, located 190 meters (210 yards) 

due west of the Nuclear Reactor 

Building. The UFTR site is 30 meters 

(33 yards) due south of Reed Laboratory; 

122 meters (134 yards) due north of the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
54658 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices 

J. W. Reitz Union building; 15 meters 

(16 yards) due west of the Journalism 

Building (Weimer Hall) and 76 meters 

(83 yards) due east of the Materials 

Building (Rhines Hall). The J. Hillis 

Miller Health Center complex is 795 

meters (870 yards) southeast of the 

UFTR and most of the University of 

Florida residence halls, fraternity 

houses, and Lake Alice are found within 

850 (930 yards) to 1,220 meters (1,334 

yards) from the UFTR. There are no 

industrial, transportation, or military 

facilities in the immediate vicinity of 

the UFTR. The nearest airport is 

approximately 8 kilometers (5 miles) 

due northeast. 

The UFTR is a modified Argonaut 

type, graphite-moderated, graphitereflected, light water cooled reactor. It is 

currently licensed for 100 kilowatts 

thermal (kW(t)) steady state power with 

a maximum power of 125 kW(t) limited 

by the protection system. The reactor is 

used for instruction and university 

research activities. The reactor is fueled 

with low-enriched uranium-aluminum 

fuel contained in MTR-type plates 

assembled in bundles. Reactivity control 

is provided by 3 safety control blades 

and 1 regulating control blade. A 

detailed description of the reactor can 

be found in the UFTR Safety Analysis 

Report (SAR). The major modification 

since 1981 was the conversion from 

high enriched uranium fuel to lowenriched uranium fuel in 2006. 

The licensee has not requested any 

changes to the facility design or 

operating conditions as part of this 

renewal request. No changes are being 

made in the types or quantities of 

effluents that may be released off site. 

The licensee has systems in place for 

controlling the release of radiological 

effluents and implements a radiation 

protection program to monitor 

personnel exposures and releases of 

radioactive effluents. As discussed in 

the NRC staff’s safety evaluation, the 

systems and radiation protection 

program are appropriate for the types 

and quantities of effluents expected to 

be generated by continued operation of 

the reactor. Accordingly, there would be 

no increase in routine occupational or 

public radiation exposure as a result of 

license renewal. As discussed in the 

NRC staff’s safety evaluation, the 

proposed action will not significantly 

increase the probability or consequences 

of accidents. Therefore, license renewal 

would not change the environmental 

impact of facility operation. The NRC 

staff evaluated information contained in 

the licensee’s application and data 

reported to the NRC by the licensee for 

the last 6 years of operation to 

determine the projected radiological 

impact of the facility on the 

environment during the period of the 

renewed license. The NRC staff found 

that releases of radioactive material and 

personnel exposures were all well 

within applicable regulatory limits. 

Based on this evaluation, the NRC staff 

concludes that continued operation of 

the reactor would not have a significant 

environmental impact. 

I. Radiological Impact 

Environmental Effects of Reactor 

Operations: 

Gaseous effluents from the UFTR are 

discharged through the reactor stack 

which is 9 meters (30 feet) high and has 

a volumetric flow rate of approximately 

7.4 cubic meters (261 cubic feet) per 

second. Other release pathways do exist; 

however, they are normally secured 

during reactor operation and they have 

insignificant flow rates compared to the 

facility stack exhaust system. The only 

significant nuclide found in the gaseous 

effluent stream is argon-41 (Ar-41). The 

licensee performed measurements of Ar41 production during reactor operation. 

Licensee calculations, based on those 

measurements, indicate that the annual 

Ar-41 releases resulted in an offsite 

concentration of 8.81 E–10 microcuries 

per milliliter (μCi/ml) of air, which is 

below the limit of 1.0 E–8 μCi/ml 

specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix 

B, for Ar-41 effluent releases in air. The 

NRC staff performed an independent 

calculation and found the licensee’s 

calculation to be reasonable. The 

potential radiation dose to a member of 

the general public resulting from this 

concentration is approximately 0.044 

milliSieverts (mSv) (4.4 millirem) per 

year and this demonstrates compliance 

with the annual dose limit of 1 mSv 

(100 millirem) set by 10 CFR 20.1301. 

Additionally, this potential radiation 

dose demonstrates compliance with the 

air emissions dose constraint of 0.1 mSv 

(10 millirem) per year specified in 10 

CFR 20.1101(d). 

The licensee disposes of liquid 

radioactive wastes from the UFTR by 

discharge into an outside above-ground 

Waste Water Holdup Tank. Liquid from 

the tanks is analyzed for radioactivity to 

verify activity levels are within 10 CFR 

20.2003 limits prior to disposal to the 

sanitary sewer. The licensee also 

disposes of liquids by transfer to a 

radioactive waste disposal facility, in 

the infrequent event that the liquid 

waste would not meet the requirements 

for discharge to the sanitary sewer. 

During the past 6 years, the licensee 

reported only routine releases of liquid 

radioactive waste once or twice each 

year to the sanitary sewerage system. 

The maximum concentration was less 

than 5.0 E–9 μCi/ml, which is well 

within the 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, 

limit for monthly average concentration 

of 1 E–7 μCi/ml for beta/gamma emitters 

released to the sewer. 

The licensee may transfer solid lowlevel radioactive waste from the UFTR 

to the University of Florida Radiation 

Control Office for appropriate disposal, 

or may transfer solid low-level waste 

directly to an authorized carrier or 

waste processor. The waste consists of 

irradiated samples, packaging materials, 

contaminated gloves and clothing, 

demineralizer resins, filters, and other 

similar items. The licensee did transfer 

spent nuclear fuel to the U.S. 

Department of Energy (DOE) from the 

site following the conversion to lowenriched uranium fuel. To comply with 

the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, 

the University of Florida has entered 

into a contract with the DOE that 

provides that DOE retains title to the 

fuel utilized at the UFTR and that DOE 

is obligated to take the fuel from the site 

for final disposition. 

As described in Chapter 11 of the 

UFTR SAR, personnel exposures are 

well within the limits set by 10 CFR 

20.1201 and are as low as is reasonably 

achievable (ALARA). The licensee 

tracks personnel exposures which are 

usually less than 0.5 mSv (50 millirem) 

per year. The University of Florida 

ALARA program requires the Radiation 

Control Officer to investigate any annual 

personnel exposures greater than 1.25 

mSv (125 millirem) in a calendar 

quarter for UFTR Operations Personnel 

and greater than 0.5 mSv (50 millirem) 

in a calendar quarter for Non-Operations 

personnel. No changes in reactor 

operation that would lead to an increase 

in occupational dose are expected as a 

result of the proposed action. 

The licensee conducts an 

environmental monitoring program to 

record and track the radiological impact 

of UFTR operation on the surrounding 

unrestricted area. The program consists 

of quarterly exposure measurements at 

twenty monitoring stations immediately 

surrounding the UFTR and 6 monitoring 

stations within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of 

the UFTR. In addition, samples are 

collected of water, soil, and vegetation 

at twenty-two locations within 300 

meters (328 yards) of the UFTR. The 

Radiation Control Officer administers 

the program and maintains the 

appropriate records. Over the past 6 

years, the survey program indicated that 

radiation exposures and sample results 

at the monitoring locations were not 

significantly higher than those 

measured at the control locations. Yearto-year trends in exposures and sample 

results are consistent between 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices 54659 

monitoring locations. Also, no 

correlation exists between total annual 

reactor operation and annual exposures 

and sample results at the monitoring 

locations. Based on the NRC staff’s 

review of the past 6 years of data, the 

NRC staff concludes that operation of 

the UFTR does not have any significant 

radiological impact on the surrounding 

environment. No changes in reactor 

operation that would affect off-site 

radiation levels are expected as a result 

of license renewal. 

Environmental Effects of Accidents: 

Accident scenarios are discussed in 

Chapter 13 of the UFTR SAR. The 

maximum hypothetical accident (MHA) 

is a core-crushing accident which would 

result in the uncontrolled release of the 

gaseous fission products from exposed 

fuel surfaces to the reactor building and 

into the environment. The licensee 

conservatively calculated doses to 

facility personnel and the maximum 

potential dose to a member of the 

public. NRC staff performed 

independent calculations to verify that 

the doses represent conservative 

estimates for the MHA. Occupational 

doses resulting from this accident 

would be well below 10 CFR 20.1201 

limit of 50 mSv (5000 millirem). 

Maximum doses for members of the 

public resulting from this accident 

would be well below 10 CFR 20.1301 

limit of 1 mSv (100 millirem). The 

proposed action will not increase the 

probability or consequences of 

accidents. 

II. Non-Radiological Impact 

The UFTR core is cooled by a light 

water primary system consisting of a 

200-gallon coolant storage tank, a heat 

removal system, and a processing 

system. Primary coolant water from the 

reactor core flows by gravity into the 

primary storage tank where the primary 

pump circulates water from the primary 

storage tank through the heat exchanger 

and returns it into the fuel boxes of the 

core. Heat is removed by the secondary 

coolant system, which uses well water. 

The secondary coolant water is 

discharged into the storm sewer with no 

mixing of water between the two 

systems. The secondary system water 

pressure is maintained slightly higher 

than the primary system to minimize 

the likelihood of primary system 

contamination entering the secondary 

system if a heat exchanger leak were to 

develop. The licensee conducts periodic 

tests of the heat exchanger to further 

reduce the likelihood of secondary 

system contamination. 

Release of thermal effluents from the 

UFTR will not have a significant effect 

on the environment. Given that the 

proposed action does not involve any 

change in the operation of the reactor 

and the heat load dissipated to the 

environment, the NRC staff concludes 

that the proposed action will not have 

a significant impact on the local water 

supply. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) and Other Considerations: 

NRC has responsibilities that are 

derived from NEPA and from other 

environmental laws, which include the 

Endangered Species Act (ESA), Coastal 

Zone Management Act (CZMA), 

National Historic Preservation Act 

(NHPA), Fish and Wildlife Coordination 

Act (FWCA) and Executive Order (EO) 

12898 Environmental Justice. Preparing 

this EA satisfies the agency’s obligations 

under NEPA. The NRC also uses this EA 

to address the requirements of the laws 

and EO mentioned above. The following 

presents a brief discussion of impacts 

associated with these laws and other 

requirements: 

I. Endangered Species Act 

Federally- or State-listed protected 

species have not been found in the 

vicinity of the UFTR. Effluents and 

emissions from the UFTR have not had 

an impact on critical habitat. 

II. Coastal Zone Management Act 

The UFTR is not located within any 

managed coastal zones nor would UFTR 

effluents and emissions impact any 

managed coastal zones. 

III. National Historical Preservation 

Act 

The NHPA requires Federal agencies 

to consider the effects of their 

undertakings on historic properties. The 

National Register of Historic Places 

(NRHP) lists several historical sites 

located on or near the University of 

Florida campus. The nearest historical 

site is the College Hill West Historical 

District, located 0.8 km (0.5 miles) from 

the UFTR site boundary. Given the 

distance between the facility and the 

College Hill West Historical District, 

continued operation of the UFTR will 

not impact any historical sites. Based on 

this information, the NRC finds that the 

potential impacts of license renewal 

would have no adverse effect on historic 

and archaeological resources. 

IV. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 

The licensee is not planning any 

water resource development projects, 

including any of the modifications 

relating to impounding a body of water, 

damming, diverting a stream or river, 

deepening a channel, irrigation, or 

altering a body of water for navigation 

or drainage. 

V. Executive Order 12898— 

Environmental Justice 

The environmental justice impact 

analysis evaluates the potential for 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health and environmental effects 

on minority and low-income 

populations that could result from the 

relicensing and the continued operation 

of the UFTR. Such effects may include 

human health, ecological, cultural, 

economic, or social impacts. Minority 

and low-income populations are subsets 

of the general public residing around 

the UFTR and all are exposed to the 

same health and environmental effects 

generated from activities at the UFTR. 

Minority populations in the vicinity 

of the UFTR—According to 2000 census 

data, 21.4 percent of the population 

(approximately 855,000 individuals) 

residing within a 80 kilometer (50-mile) 

radius of UFTR identified themselves as 

minority individuals. The largest 

minority was Black or African American 

(120,000 persons or 14.1 percent), 

followed by Hispanic or Latino (41,000 

or 4.8 percent). According to the U.S. 

Census Bureau, about 30.3 percent of 

the Alachua County population 

identified themselves as minorities with 

persons of Black or African American 

origin comprising the largest minority 

group (19.3 percent). According to the 

census data 3-year average estimates for 

2006–2008, the minority population of 

Alachua County, as a percent of the total 

population, had increased to 32.9 

percent. 

Low-income Populations in the 

Vicinity of the UFTR—According to 

2000 Census data, approximately 23,000 

families and 128,000 individuals 

(approximately 10.3 and 14.9 percent, 

respectively) residing within a 50-mile 

radius of the UFTR were identified as 

living below the Federal poverty 

threshold in 1999. The 1999 Federal 

poverty threshold was $17,029 for a 

family of four. 

According to Census data in the 

2006–2008 American Community 

Survey 3–Year Estimates, the median 

household income for Florida was 

$48,637, while 12.6 percent of the state 

population and 9.0 percent of families 

were determined to be living below the 

Federal poverty threshold. Alachua 

County had a lower median household 

income average ($40,987) and higher 

percentages (22.3 percent) of 

individuals and families (10.3 percent) 

living below the poverty level, 

respectively. 

Impact Analysis—Potential impacts to 

minority and low-income populations 

would mostly consist of radiological 

effects; however radiation doses from 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
54660 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices 

continued operations associated with 

this license renewal are expected to 

continue at current levels, and would be 

well below regulatory limits. 

Based on this information and the 

analysis of human health and 

environmental impacts presented in this 

environmental assessment, the proposed 

relicensing would not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health and environmental effects 

on minority and low-income 

populations residing in the vicinity of 

UFTR. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action: 

As an alternative to license renewal, 

the NRC considered denying the 

proposed action. If the NRC denied the 

request for license renewal, reactor 

operations would cease and 

decommissioning would be required. 

The NRC notes that, even with a 

renewed license, the UFTR will 

eventually be decommissioned, at 

which time the environmental effects of 

decommissioning would occur. 

Decommissioning would be conducted 

in accordance with an NRC-approved 

decommissioning plan which would 

require a separate environmental review 

under 10 CFR 51.21. Cessation of 

facility operations would reduce or 

eliminate radioactive effluents and 

emissions. However, as previously 

discussed in this environmental 

assessment, radioactive effluents and 

emissions from reactor operations 

constitute a small fraction of the 

applicable regulatory limits. Therefore, 

the environmental impacts of license 

renewal and the denial of the request for 

license renewal would be similar. In 

addition, denying the request for license 

renewal would eliminate the benefits of 

teaching, research, and services 

provided by the UFTR. 

Alternative Use of Resources: 

The proposed action does not involve 

the use of any different resources or 

significant quantities of resources 

beyond those previously considered in 

the issuance of Amendment No. 13 to 

Facility Operating License No. R–56 for 

the University of Florida Training 

Reactor dated August 30, 1982, which 

renewed the Facility Operating License 

for a period of 20 years. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted: 

In accordance with the Agency’s 

stated policy, on March 15, 2010, the 

staff consulted with the State Liaison 

Officer, regarding the environmental 

impact of the proposed action. The 

consultation involved a thorough 

explanation of the environmental 

review, the details of this environmental 

assessment, and the NRC staff’s 

findings. The State official stated that he 

understood the NRC review and had no 

comments regarding the proposed 

action. 

The NRC staff also provided 

information about the proposed activity 

to the State Office of Historical 

Preservation on March 16, 2010. The 

Office of Historical Preservation agreed 

with the NRC regarding the conclusions 

of the historical assessment. 

Finding of No Significant Impact: 

On the basis of the environmental 

assessment, the NRC concludes that the 

proposed action will not have a 

significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment. Accordingly, the 

NRC has determined not to prepare an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action. 

For further details with respect to the 

proposed action, see the licensee’s 

application dated July 18, 2002 

[ML022130145 and ML022130185]; as 

supplemented by letters dated July 25, 

2002 [ML022130230 and 

ML022130244]; July 29, 2002 

[ML022130140]; July 31, 2002 

[ML081340724]; February 25, 2003 

[ML102240048]; August 8, 2006 

[ML062230078]; February 2, 2007 

[ML102240038]; April 7, 2008 

[ML081350571]; November 26, 2008 

[ML083450718]; September 28, 2009 

[ML093620300]; October 20, 2009 

[ML100430693]; February 26, 2010 

[ML100610445]; March 11, 2010 

[ML100710497]; March 26, 2010 

[ML100880334]; May 3, 2010 

[ML101250177]; and June 1, 2010 

[ML101590221] and annual progress 

reports [ML090500396, ML092390117, 

ML092390039, ML092440258, 

ML092440257 and ML060190085]. 

Documents may be examined, and/or 

copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR), located at One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike 

(first floor), Rockville, Maryland. 

Publicly available records will be 

accessible electronically from the 

Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS) Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the NRC 

Web site http://www.nrc.gov/readingroom/adams.html. Persons who do not 

have access to ADAMS or who 

encounter problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS should 

contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737, or 

send an e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day 

of August 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jessie F. Quichocho, 

Chief, Research and Test Reactors Licensing 

Branch, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22392 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2010–0002] 

Sunshine Act; Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission. 

DATES: Weeks of September 6, 13, 20, 

27, October 4, 11, 2010. 

PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

STATUS: Public and Closed. 

Week of September 6, 2010 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of September 6, 2010. 

Week of September 13, 2010—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of September 13, 2010. 

Week of September 20, 2010—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of September 20, 2010. 

Week of September 27, 2010—Tentative 

Wednesday, September 29, 2010 

1 p.m. Briefing on Resolution of Generic 

Safety Issue (GSI)—191, Assessment 

of Debris Accumulation on 

Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) 

Sump Performance (Public 

Meeting). (Contact: Michael Scott, 

301–415–0565). 

This meeting will be Webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov. 

Week of October 4, 2010—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of October 4, 2010. 

Week of October 11, 2010—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of October 11, 2010. 

* * * * * 

* The schedule for Commission 

meetings is subject to change on short 

notice. To verify the status of meetings, 

call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. 

Contact person for more information: 

Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651. 

* * * * * 

The NRC Commission Meeting 

Schedule can be found on the Internet 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html. 

* * * * * 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES