alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54656-54657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-105)]


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to grant exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 
37

[[Page 54657]]

CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant an 
exclusive license in the United States to practice the inventions 
described and claimed in U.S. Patent Applications corresponding to NASA 
Case Nos. ARC-14744-2 entitled ``A Versatile Platform for 
Nanotechnology Based on Circular Permutations of Chaperonin Protein,'' 
and ARC-15981-1 entitled ``Chaperonin-Based Templates for Pseudo-
Cellulosomes'' to Conderos, Inc., having its principal place of 
business at 830 Garland Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Patent rights in 
this invention have been assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. The prospective exclusive license will comply with the 
terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice, NASA receives 
written objections including evidence and argument that establish that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. Competing applications completed and 
received by NASA within fifteen (15) days of the date of this published 
notice will also be treated as objections to the grant of the 
contemplated exclusive license.
    Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by 
law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective license may be 
submitted to Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Ames 
Research Center, Mail Stop 202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000. (650) 
604-5104; Fax (650) 604-2767.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert M. Padilla, Chief Patent 
Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 
202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000. (650) 604-5104; Fax (650) 604-
2767. Information about other NASA inventions available for licensing 
can be found online at http://technology.nasa.gov/.

    Dated: September 1, 2010.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22390 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Faust, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10–K/A for the period ended December 31, 2019 of SAExploration Holdings, Inc.; and

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

| Date: May 12, 2020 |   | /s/ Michael Faust                     |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|               |   | Michael Faust                         |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|               |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MSO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, for the period ending March 31, 2006 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1)              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas M. Mason   Thomas M.
MasonChief Financial Officer

Date: May 22, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1737

JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE; CHARLES JORDAN, City of Hampton 

Police Chief,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,

Chief District Judge. (4:12-cv-00070-RBS-DEM)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John M. Dickson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. Doe, No. 4:12-

cv-00070-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. May 15, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
      31.1






CERTIFICATION




I,
      Leslie
      I. Handler, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Encompass Holdings, Inc.




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings, Inc.
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      I are
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:




a.
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b.
      Evaluated the effectiveness of Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation.




Date:
      March 14, 2007




/s/
      LESLIE I. HANDLER


Leslie
      I.
      Handler


President
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 52-040-COL and 52-041-COL; ASLBP No. 10-903-02-COL-BD01]


Florida Power and Light Company; Establishment of Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the 
following proceeding:

Florida Power & Light Company (Turkey Point Units 6 and 7)

    This proceeding concerns petitions to intervene submitted (1) by 
the Village of Pinecrest, Florida, (2) by Citizens for Safe Energy, 
Inc., and (3) jointly by Mark Oncavage, Dan Kipnis, Southern Alliance 
for Clean Energy, and National Parks Conservation Association. These 
petitions were submitted in response to a June 18, 2010 Notice of 
Hearing and Opportunity to Petition for Leave to Intervene (75 FR 
34,777). Petitioners challenge the application filed by Florida Power & 
Light Company pursuant to Subpart C of 10 CFR Part 52 for a combined 
license for Turkey Point Units 6 and 7, to be located in Homestead, 
Florida.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

E. Roy Hawkens, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Dr. Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Dr. William C. Burnett, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of August 2010.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22178 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES R. JENNINGS.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### IN RE DULA

No. 266A01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 16

Motion by respondent for temporary stay denied 7 June 2000. Petition by respondent for writ of supersedeas denied 7 June 2001.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders        Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Asset, Consulting Experts, LLC and 

Michael C. Evans, Appellants

No. 06-15-00048-CV v.

Jonathan Sistrunk, Appellee

Appeal from the 170th District Court of 

McLennan County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2015-

321-4). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellants to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the costs of this appeal be borne by the party incurring them.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 10, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6005]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   REPORT ON RESCISSION PROPOSALS--MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT--PM 43

  The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before the Senate the following message 
from the President of the United States, together with an accompanying 
report; which was referred jointly, pursuant to the order of January 
30, 1975, as modified by the order of April 11, 1986, to the Committee 
on Appropriations, to the Committee on the Budget, to the Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and to the Committee on the 
Judiciary.

To the Congress of the United States:
  In accordance with the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974, I herewith report three rescission proposals, totaling 
$132.0 million.
  The proposed rescissions affect the Departments of Justice and 
Transportation, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
                                                  William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, May 2, 1995.
  

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2011-1Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed bythe servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements requiredin this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: DealerTrack Collateral Management Servicesand U.S. Bank National Association.

 

 

 

Date: June 26, 2012

 

 

 

  /s/ Paul C. Honda                                     

Paul C. Honda
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-10110

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ROZELL WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-311-A

_________________________________________________________________

December 3, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have considered the claims of the petitioner-appellant.

Our review of the record and the papers before us make it clear

that the district court did not err in concluding that Williams has

failed to demonstrate that his plea of guilty was involuntary.
 

1Williams’s motions for an investigator, for exhibits, etc.,

and of objection to transcripts, etc., are DENIED.

-2-

Furthermore, none of the allegations relating to his counsel

ultimately demonstrate deficiency and, thus, Williams has failed to

to raise a cognizable constitutional claim of ineffective counsel.

Finally, Williams’s argument that he was denied due process because

the state failed to provide favorable evidence consisting of the

results of the blood test, the polygraph test, and the firearm’s

test is not properly before this court, because it was not raised

in the court below. In any event, this claim presents no basis

upon which to grant habeas relief to Williams.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court dismissing

Williams’s complaint is

A F F I R M E D.1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.i.2


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       THE COLONEL'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.


     Pursuant to the provisions of Act 284, Public Acts of 1972 (the "Act"), the
undersigned executes the following Certificate:

     1.     The present name of the corporation is: The Colonel's International,
Inc.

     2.     The identification number assigned by the Michigan Department of
Consumer & Industry Services Bureau of Commercial Services is: 344-630.

     3.     Article 1 of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended to read
as follows:

            "The name of the corporation is Sports Resorts International, Inc."

     4.     The foregoing amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was duly
adopted on the 6th day of March, 2001 by written consent of the shareholders
having not less than the minimum number of votes required by statute in
accordance with Section 450.1407(1) of the Act. Written notice to shareholders
who have not consented in writing shall be given promptly.


Signed this 6th day of March, 2001        By: Donald J. Williamson
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  Donald J. Williamson
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffery W. Clark, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Poage Bankshares, Inc.;

2) Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 17, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jeffery W. Clark   
|Jeffery W. Clark,      
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  Encompass  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 30, 2006               ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ ARTHUR N. ROBINS
                                 --------------------------
                                 Arthur N. Robins
                                 Chief Executive Officer