alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Bataan Memorial Death March / Expediting contract processesPublished March 22, 2019
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                On this look Around the Air Force, military members gather at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, for the 30th annual Bataan Memorial Death March, and Dr. Will Roper, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, technology, and logistics, talks on expediting contracting processes. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Angelo Rosario. </iframe  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page. Related links:- **Bataan March**- **Contract Processes**ATAF 



Air Force TV 



Around theAir Force 



Featured Videos 



AF Reports 



Dr. Will Roper 



assistant secretary of the Air Force 



acquisition 



technology 



and Logistics 



Bataan Memorial Death March 



White Sands Missile Range 



New Mexico 



Airman 1st  Angelo Rosario
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALEXIS A. RIVERA-NUÑEZ a/k/a )

ALEXIS A. NUÑEZ, DOC #T70839, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3069

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 20, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

Alexis A. Rivera-Nuñez, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Epicor Software Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:


1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 29, 2013By:/s/ Kathleen CruscoKathleen CruscoChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### MORRIS COUNTY FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL AND PUBLIC ADVOCATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 7 , 202 3

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 3

- 00 476

- CV

GERREN

- JARROD BROKENBERRY , Appellant

V.

AIDA IRIS VICTORIA , Appelle e

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1203270

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a n amended final judgment signed July 18 , 2023

. The court reporter indicated on July 12, 2023 that appellant was not requesting the reporter’s record. The clerk’s record was filed August 25 , 202 3

. No brief was filed.

On September 28 , 2023 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant
filed a brief on or before October 30 , 202 3 , the appeal was subject to dismissal
without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P

. 4.1(a), 42.3(b).2 Appellant filed no brief or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 24, 2011 

y0516 

Order 

 

May 24, 2011 

142569 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142569 

 COA: 293968 

Wayne CC: 09-008114-01 

JOHN HENRY SIMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2010, at 11 a.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: September 1, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-22559 Filed 9-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### CAROLE ANN PESKIN (ESLEA) v. ARTHUR ESLEA.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 11,954.

#### Joyce et al. *v.*Dickey.

Filed Nov. 18, 1885.

*Appeal.*— Time *of.*— Dismissal.—Practice.—An appeal not taken within one year from the time the case was finally disposed of on its merits will be .dismissed.

From *the*Jefferson Circuit Court.

*C. E. Walker,*for appellants.

*J. W. Linck, W. T. Friedley*and *C. A. Korbly,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered in February, 1880. On the 11th day of the -following December the appellants moved the court to strike out part of the original complaint then on file, in order to make it the same as a substituted complaint which had been filed by the appellee. This motion was not ruled upon until October 15th, 1883, when it was sustained. In February, 1880, the motion for a new trial was overruled, and this was followed by a judgment for the appellee. On the 15th day of October, 1884, this appeal was taken.

The appellee, in his answer to the appellants’ assignment •of errors and by motion to dismiss, presents the question of the right to appeal. W e think that the motion to dismiss must be sustained. The case was finally disposed of upon its •merits, when the motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment entered in favor of the appellee in February, 1880, •and as the appeal was not taken within a year from that time, it can not be entertained. The appeal is not from the ruling made on the motion in October, 1883, for that ruling was in favor of the appellants, but from the judgment rendered in February, 1880. The decision of the trial court upon the merits of the case was made at the date last mentioned, and not in October, 1883, when the motion of the appellants was sustained.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.b
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael L. Zapf

Michael L. Zapf
May 11, 2009
 *
    
    This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Westwood One, Inc. and will be retained by Westwood One, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS


 


	
OF


	
 


ARKADIA INTERNATIONAL




























The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this 6th day of October, 2014







WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to effectuate a new Board of Directors of the Company;







NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected:







RICHARD COWAN as Director







The Above qualified Director, having been nominated, has accepted his position as DIRECTOR of the Company.







Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.

















Dated:  October 6th, 2014

















__/s/ Richard Cowan_____________


Richard Cowan,


on behalf of the Majority Shareholders
Be cause the notice wa s due Nove mber 28, 2008, the da y -af ter-T hanksg iving holiday , the 1 deadline e x tended to Monday , Dec ember 1, 2008. SeeTex. R. App. P . 4.1. Sanchez orig inally

filed his notice of a

ppeal with the district cler k on Fr iday , Dec ember

5, 2 2008. The notice was filed w ith the county cler k on Monday , Dec ember

8, 2008. 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 757 -CR

M ic hae l Sa nc he z , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1- CR-08 -50 1063 , HO NORAB LE MI KE DENTO N , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
On Octobe r 29, 2008, Michae l Sanchez was c onvicted b as ed o n h is plea of
no lo c on te nd e re a ssa

ult wi th bo dil y inj ur

y (f amil y vio le nc e ) and wa s se nte nc e d to 12 0 d ay s in ja il. The re cord doe s not contain a motion for ne w trial. His notice of appea l was due thirty

day s later on Dec ember

1, 2008. SeeTex R. App. P
. 2 6 .2(a) (1). Sanc hez filed a notice of appe al on

1 Dec ember

5, 2008. Th e re c or d doe s not co nta in a moti on to e xten d ti me to f ile the no tic e of

a pp e a l. 2 Sanchez’s notice of

appea l was filed late
. San ch ez re ci tes in his notice of appe al that sentenc e wa s imposed ag ainst him on November

25, 2008, but the documents in the cle rk’s re cord do not support t h at asser tion.2

Def endant’ s Plea of Guilty , Nolo Conten d er e, W aiver & Stipulation was sig ned and dated October 29, 2008, by

Sanchez and other s. The judg ment and sente nce r ec i t e t h at , “On this the 29th day of Oc tober, 2008, this cause was c alled for trial.” It further rec ites that Sanchez pleade d nolo contender e and the trial cour t found him guilty . Sanchez’s attorne y filed his Request for Pay ment for Ser

vices Rende red a s Court Appointed Counsel on October 29, 2008, rec iting that the “F inal Case Disposition” was a plea. The court’s doc ket shee t entries st at e t h at S anche z pleaded nolo contender e and w as sentenc ed on Oc to b er 2 9 , 2 0 08. The Tr ial Court’s Certification of Def endant’ s Right of Appe al re cit es t h at “the notice of appe al was not timely filed, and th e de fend anthas NO r igh t o f appe al. ” (Empha sis in orig inal.) We conclude that the judg ment was enter ed and se ntence imposed and sig ned on Oc tober 29, 2008. Sanchez filed his notice of appea l on Dec ember

8, 2008, more than thirty day s after

the s en t en ce w as imposed. Acc ording ly , we conclude that Sanchez’s notice of appea l was not timely

filed. SeeTex. R. App. P . 26.2(a) (1). We d ism iss thi s a

pp e a l be c a

us e the no tic e of

a pp e a l w a s n ot t ime ly fi le d a nd be c a us e the re cord la cks a c ertifica tion that shows he has a right of appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 25.2(d), 26.2.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed Filed: Apr il 2, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Hubert E. Seaton, Jr., Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00226

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 001

- 80908

- 17 ). Memorandum Opinion d elivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that th e appellant, Hubert E. Seaton, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 5, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1







Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, John Castillo Eggermont, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Kopjaggers, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |     |                                                            | 
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: March 31, 2014 | By: | /s/ John Castillo Eggermont                                | 
|                     |     | Name: John Castillo Eggermont                              | 
|                     |     | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Aaron D. Peck, certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Monroe Capital Corporation; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)

          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)

          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)

          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)

          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 6, 2015 /s/ Aaron D. PeckAaron D. Peck Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Monroe Capital Corporation
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4513]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, Rev. James David Ford, D.D., offered the following 
prayer:
  With this ardent petition, O gracious God, we pray for the gift of 
wisdom in our hearts and in our actions, that what we ask or think or 
do will advance the good of the Nation and be to the benefit of every 
person. May we have perceptive minds and discerning hearts; may we be 
astute in our judgments and show mercy in our decisions so that the 
gift of wisdom will be our heritage and our legacy. Bless us and all 
Your people this day and every day, we pray. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, David Christie, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Dane Exploration Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.








Date:  January 10, 2012





/s/ David Christie


David Christie


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 87-6523.

#### March *v.*Brewster et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2



|    |  |                    |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|NSA |  | Netherland, Sewell |  | 
|    |  | & Associates, Inc. |  | 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our audit letter as of December 31, 2011, and references thereto, which are included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of WPX Energy, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2011.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ C. H. (Scott) Rees III C. H. (Scott) Rees III, P. E.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

February 25, 2012
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4546]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        DELETIONS OF SPONSORS FROM PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

  Under clause 4 of rule XXII, sponsors were deleted from public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 774: Mrs. Seastrand.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
85-B  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the  period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.
Larson,  Chief  Financial Officer of Net Lease  Management  85-B,
Inc.,  the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                              /s/ Mark E Larson
                                  Mark E. Larson
                                  Chief Financial Officer of
                                  Net Lease Management 85-B, Inc.,
                                  the Managing General Partner
                                  August 6, 2002