alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.1
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


     VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of said corporation, by unanimous
consent in lieu of a meeting pursuant to Section 141(f) of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, duly adopted resolutions setting forth
a proposed amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended,
of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and directing that
said amendment be considered at the next annual meeting of stockholders.  The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

          RESOLVED, that, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the
     Company, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the
     Company be, and the same hereby is, amended by changing paragraph (a) of
     Article FIFTH so that, as amended, said paragraph (a) of Article FIFTH
     shall be and read in its entirety as follows:

               "FIFTH. (a) The total number of shares of all classes of stock
               which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is one
               hundred sixty-five million (165,000,000) shares consisting of one
               hundred sixty million (160,000,000) shares of Common Stock,
               having a par value of One-Half Cent ($.005) per share, and five
               million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, having a par value
               of One Cent ($.01) per share."

     SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
the 2000 annual meeting of stockholders of said corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of said amendment.
<PAGE>

     THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Vintage Petroleum, Inc. has caused this certificate to
be signed by S. Craig George, its President, and attested by William C. Barnes,
its Secretary, this 31st day of May, 2000.

                                 VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INC.


                                 By:/s/ S. Craig George
                                    --------------------------------------------
ATTEST:                             S. Craig George
                                    President

/s/ William C. Barnes
------------------------------
William C. Barnes
Secretary
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D517]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings

  No committee meetings were held.
```
#### Carter *v.*Dallimore and others.

The marine court, although for some purposes a court of record, is not authorized to give a judgment upon a default, without proof of the plaintiff’s demand.

Although the appellate court will not weigh tlie evidence below so as to reverse if it merely preponderates against the judgment; a material defect of proof is fatal to the judgment below.

Nov. 18th;

Dec. 9th, 1848.

Appeal from a judgment rendered against the defendants in the marine court. The matters involved appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

S. *P. Nash,*for the appellants.

O. *W. Sturtevant,*for the respondent.

By the Court. Sandford, J.

The evidence in the court below, was entirely insufficient to warrant a judgment against the defendants. It is however contended by the plaintiff, that the default of the defendants to appear, dispensed with full proof; and that this court will not weigh the evidence.

1. As to the latter point, we are required by the code, to give judgment according to the justice of the case. (Section 317.) The principle laid down in *Stryker*v. *Bergen,*(15 Wend. 490,) is therefore applicable ; and a material defect of proof is fatal to the judgment below.

2. The marine court, although for some purposes a court of record, is not authorized to give a judgment upon a default, without proof of the plaintiff’s demand. The statute creating the court provides, (2 R. L. 386, § 122,) that upon the return of a summons served, the court shall proceed to hear and examine the proofs and allegations of the parties. No distinction is made between cases in which the defendant appears, and those in which he makes default. The court, in all alike, is to hear *223and examine the proofs, and give judgment thereon agreeable to law and equity.

So in the statute relative to courts held by justices of the peace, (2 R. S, 242, § 92,) whenever the defendant neglects to appear, on personal service of the summons, the justice is to proceed and must hear the proofs and allegations of the plaintiff, and determine the same according to law and equity.

The same provision has been embraced in every act for the recovery of small debts from 1787 to the revised statutes, and in the same language, except that in the acts prior to the revised statutes, the justice was directed to hear the proofs, &c., of the *parties.*And under those statutes, while the supreme court exercised a direct appellate jurisdiction, it uniformly reversed, where there was a defect of proof, or where the recovery was for a different cause of action from that declared upon. Some of the prominent cases are cited by Bronson, J. in 15 Wend. 491, and they are very numerous.

It suffices to say that they establish most fully, that the default of the defendant to appear, concedes nothing in favor of the plaintiff’s demand, and that his claim must be sustained by proof.

Judgment set aside and new trial ordered in the court below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT 11

                VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  CALCULATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30       SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
<S> <C>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             1998        1997                 1998           1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Net Income                                                 $ 63,809       $ 74             $  43,080     $    302
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         37,107     40,298                37,474       40,560

Adjustments necessary to reflect weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding on a diluted basis             1,519      2,030                 1,083        1,202
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          

                                                             38,626     42,328                38,557       41,762
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Diluted net income per common share                        $   1.65      $0.00                  1.12     $   0.01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
13.1






906
Certification




Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549




Ladies
and Gentlemen:




The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) for the
purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.




Lai-Juh
(L.J.) Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of AU Optronics Corp., certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:




1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and




2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of AU Optronics
Corp.




Date: May
27, 2009




By:
                  /s/ LAI-JUH
      (L.J.) CHENName:
                  Lai-Juh
      (L.J.) ChenTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to AU Optronics Corp. and will be
retained by AU Optronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E905-E906]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 IN HONOR OF FRANK PERRUCCI AND THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CONCERNED 
                          CITIZENS OF BAYONNE

                                 ______

                          HON. ROBERT MENENDEZ

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate the Concerned 
Citizens Organization of Bayonne on the recent celebration of their 
25th anniversary. The organization was founded by Frank P. Perrucci, a 
concerned citizen who has dedicated most of his life to serving his 
community.
  The Concerned Citizens Organization was founded in 1970 and the 
purpose of this organization is to improve the quality of life for city 
residents. Their motto, ``We Care, Do You,'' symbolizes their 
commitment to community activism and civic involvement. The 
organization recognizes exceptional citizens by granting awards to 
those who have performed heroically.
  Frank Perrucci, as the standard bearer of the Concerned Citizens 
Organization, has been the driving force of this community group. He 
has contributed his time and effort to many worthy causes including a 
voter registration drive, the ``I Love Bayonne'' project and efforts to 
protect the rights of the elderly. Regarding voter registration, Mr. 
Perrucci has participated in various forums aimed at encouraging 
participation in our democratic system.
  While contributing to the community, he has also been a devoted 
husband, married to the former Jean Baccarella for the past 44 years, 
and an exceptional father to his four children. Mr. Perrucci is the 
proud grandfather of seven.
  His contributions to the community have garnered him numerous awards, 
including the Boy Scouts of America Distinguished Citizen Award. He has 
also received awards from the national, State and Hudson County 
Catholic 
[[Page E906]] War Veterans, as well as from the city of Bayonne, the 
New Jersey Assembly, and the New Jersey Senate.
  I would like to take this opportunity to thank Frank P. Perrucci on 
behalf of the city of Bayonne for all his hard work in the community. I 
am truly proud to have such an outstanding citizen living in the 13th 
Congressional District. Please also join me in praising Mr. Perrucci 
and the Concerned Citizens of Bayonne Organization for 25 years of 
dedication and commitment.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0398 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON DANIEL SHEWALTER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 27 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2024

07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0398
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2544

     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
 Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of 
                               Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2014

  Mr. Johanns (for himself and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
 Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of 
                               Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 213 of the Reclamation 
Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within the 
Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska (referred to in 
this section as the ``district'') may repay, at any time, the 
construction costs of project facilities allocated to the land of the 
landowner within the district.
    (b) Applicability of Full-Cost Pricing Limitations.--On discharge, 
in full, of the obligation for repayment of the construction costs that 
are allocated to all land of the landowner in the district, the land 
shall not be subject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations 
under the reclamation laws.
    (c) Certification.--On request of a landowner that has repaid, in 
full, the construction costs described in subsection (a), the Secretary 
of the Interior shall provide to the landowner a certificate described 
in section 213(b)(1) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 
390mm(b)(1)).
    (d) Effect.--Nothing in this section--
            (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or amends or 
        reopens, the reclamation contract between the district and the 
        United States; or
            (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relationships 
        between the district and landowners in the district under 
        Nebraska State law.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4446]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1100

  After recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempo [Mr. Combest].

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5853-S5854]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING HARRY WEINROTH

 Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I rise today to honor Mr. Harry 
Weinroth on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of his liberation from 
concentration camp, April 30, 1995. Mr. Weinroth was born in Sosnowiec, 
Poland. At the age of 13 he voluntarily entered a concentration camp so 
that his father 
[[Page S5854]] would not have to. Throughout the war he was held in 
several different camps including Buchenwald, Gross Rosen, and Dachau.
  Mr. Weinroth lost both parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, three 
brothers, and one sister in the camps. Only he and one sister survived, 
whom he found after the war in Germany. Mr. Weinroth along with his 
sister came to Stamford, CT, in June 1949. He came to this country with 
nothing but his trade, watchmaking, and promptly started a small 
business repairing watches. Over the years Bedford Jewelers has grown 
into a family retail jewelry store--he works there today with his wife, 
daughter, and son.
  He still resides in Stamford, and is an active member in the 
community and his synagogue, Congregation Agudath Sholom. He married 
his wife, Luba, in 1952, whom he met at a displaced persons camp in 
Germany in 1948. They have two sons and a daughter, and three grandsons 
to carry on the family name. A 50th anniversary is worth celebrating, 
yet an anniversary that represents as much as this one should not and 
will not go unrecognized. I salute Mr. Weinroth for his courage and 
perseverance in the face of extreme hardship.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of Reebok International Ltd. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)       the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
         30, 2002 ("10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Company's 10-Q being filed fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Paul Fireman
                                    ------------------
                                    Paul Fireman
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: 13 August 2002
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MELVIN L. JOHNSON.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 116th ACW deploys Airmen to distribute food, water for Hurricane Michael reliefPublished Oct. 15, 2018
                        
                        
                        116th Air Control Wing Public Affairs
                **ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from the 116th Air Control Wing, Georgia Air National Guard, deployed from Robins Air Force Base Oct. 15, to help distribute food and water to citizens affected by Hurricane Michael in Seminole County, Georgia.The team of 11 Airmen join other members of the wing who are already working in Seminole County clearing roadways to allow access for first responders and utility companies to begin caring for victims affected by the storm.“I think it’s important for us to be here to support the people who have been affected by Hurricane Michael,” said 2nd Lt. Justice King, officer in charge of the operation. “A big reason many of us joined the Air National Guard is to help with humanitarian missions when unexpected events like this happen.”The 116th ACW is highly trained and experienced in accomplishing these types of missions. In 2005, Airmen from the wing deployed in support of Hurricane Katrina relief efforts and more recently in support of Hurricane Irma relief in September 2017 and Hurricane Matthew relief in October 2016.“Our Airmen train consistently for these types of situations. This is part of what we do and what the Georgia Air National Guard is all about, to help the citizens of Georgia when something like this occurs,” said Col. Jonathan Cox, 116th Mission Support Group commander. “Citizens in our state are in need and we have the capabilities to help relieve some of that distress.”The 116th ACW’s primary missions include the E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System and domestic operations including route clearance, security, communications, and medical response during domestic emergencies like Hurricane Michael.AF 



Air Force 



hurricane 



Michael 



Robins AFB 



116th ACW 



Deploy 



food 



water 



relief 



disaster 



weather 



Air Force Base 



Georgia ANG 



Air National Guard
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Aaron D. Peck, certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Monroe Capital Corporation; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)

          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)

          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)

          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)

          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 7, 2017 /s/ Aaron D. PeckAaron D. PeckChief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Monroe Capital Corporation