alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Advance assignments now available to Airmen deploying for 365-day Extended DeploymentsPublished Nov. 7, 2018
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Effective Nov. 1, active duty Airmen selected for an extended deployment may apply to receive an advance assignment up to 16 months prior to the projected Report Not Later Than Date of the assignment.This means Airmen can have permanent change of station orders in hand immediately after completing all required PCS actions and before departing on their deployment, providing their dependents the option to move early to their next assignment location.  “This change recognizes the need for us to increase stability and predictability for our Airmen and their families and helps our Airmen focus on their mission while deployed,” said Lt. Gen. Brian Kelly, Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services. “The ability to receive an assignment prior to departing for an extended deployment allows Airmen to make decisions that are good for them and their families.”Previously, Airmen on extended deployments were required to be deployed for at least 60 days before being notified about potential assignments, and orders were not published earlier than 120 days prior to the new reporting date, making it difficult for Airmen and their families to plan.In 2017, the Air Force’s Personnel Center chartered a 365-Day Extended Deployments Working Group to look at initiatives to find better ways to accommodate and incentivize year-long deployments. Approximately 400 Airmen per year are selected for 365-day extended deployment.The 365-day deployment policy change allows Airmen time to out-process from their losing base, provides the option to move their dependents to the new assignment location, and gives Airmen the option to request movement from their deployed location directly to their new assignment without having to return to their currently assigned unit first.Airmen selected for an extended deployments should contact their local Military Personnel Section for more information.assignment 



Airmen 



extended deployments 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Heather Wilson 



SecAF 



Report Not Later Than Date 



RNLTD 



PCS 



Permanent Change of Station 



Air Force Personnel Center 



AFPC 



Military Personnel Section 



MPS 



Air Force 



AF
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) of ROI Land Investments Ltd.
and Subsidiaries (the “Company”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacities as Principal Executive
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigned’s knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 29, 2017



/s/ Martin Sholz

Martin Scholz

Principal Executive Officer



The foregoing certification
is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDG Environmental, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Todd B. Fortier Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Todd B. FortierTodd B. Fortier
Ex 10.1listofproject600awards




Exhibit 10.1
List of Project 600 Awards to Executive Officers
	
		
	Executive Officer
	Base Number

	Lance C. Balk
	45,000

	John M. Duffey
	120,000

	Walter S. Hawrylak
	40,000

	Brett Petit
	40,000

	James Reid-Anderson
	500,000

	Leonard A. Russ
	22,500
#### ROCKY LEE STEPHENSON v. R.A. JONES & CO., INC. v. SUNSHINE BISCUIT, INC.

March 19, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Todd B. Fortier, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDG Environmental, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report. 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (iii) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and; 5. I have disclosed, based upon my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (i) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By         /s/Todd B. Fortier    Todd B. Fortier    Chief Financial Officer   Date: September 14, 2006
26
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2732 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2732

   To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the threshold 
figure at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct 
   examination and reporting requirements of the Bureau of Consumer 
             Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2014

  Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Donnelly) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the threshold 
figure at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct 
   examination and reporting requirements of the Bureau of Consumer 
             Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 
Examination and Reporting Threshold Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE EXAMINATION THRESHOLD.

    Section 1025(a) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5515(a)) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000,000'' each 
place that term appears and inserting ``$50,000,000,000''.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN THE REPORTING THRESHOLD.

    Section 1026(a) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5516(a)) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000,000'' each 
place that term appears and inserting ``$50,000,000,000''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date that is 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: SPOC, Grey Wolf, Air Force 75th B-Day ThemePublished Jan. 10, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Today's look Around the Air Force features the redesignation of the 14th Air Force as Space Operations Command, the newest Grey Wolf helicopter, and the Air Force announces its 75th birthday theme competition. (Hosted by Senior Airman Angelo Rosario)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
-14th Air Force redesignated as Space Operations Command
- Air Force names newest helicopter Grey Wolf
- Air Force to solicit 75th birthday theme ideasAFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Airmen 



SPOC 



Space Operations Command 



14th 



2020 



NDAA 



space force 



space 



M-H-193-A 



Grey 



Wolf 



helicopter 



faster 



smarter 



Global Strike 



ICBM 



Air Force We Need 



Huey 



birthday 



75 



75th 



2022 



competition 



theme 



AFA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Battle Mountain Gold Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999<F1>
<CASH>                                          21,500                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,800                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     32,400                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,400                       0
<PP&E>                                         829,900                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 541,200                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 465,600                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,800                       0
<BONDS>                                        161,900                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    110,600                       0
<COMMON>                                        13,300                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,400)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   465,600                       0
<SALES>                                         62,500                  53,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,500                  53,800
<CGS>                                           56,900                  50,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,900                  50,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,600                   3,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,800                   3,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,200)                (14,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,600)                 (1,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,600)                (12,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,500)                (14,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)                  (0.06)
<FN>
<F1>AS RESTATED
</FN>


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135138(25) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, SHELLY ANNE STRUCK and ELOY STRUCK, Justices 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 135138 

 COA: 276219 
 Bay CC: 04-003607-NO

MICHAEL KUSMIERZ and AUTOZONE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 6, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

MARKMAN, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would remand 

this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted for that court to determine whether a 

person suffering from a post-traumatic stress disorder is suffering from an “objectively 

manifested” impairment of an important bodily function under MCL 500.3135(7). 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.2

           AWARENESS LETTER--UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

XTO Energy Inc.

Fort Worth, Texas

   We are aware that our report dated April 23, 2001, which was included in the
Cross Timbers Oil Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001, is being incorporated by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3.


   We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Regulation C
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of that Act.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas

June 21, 2001
Exhibit 99.8

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the reference to
our firm under the caption Experts and to the use in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. (the Corporation) of our report dated January 21, 2014 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of the Corporation as of and for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, included herein and our report dated January 21, 2014 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2013, included as Exhibit 99.1 to, and incorporated by reference in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 40-F.

(Signed) Ernst & Young LLP1

Montréal, Canada

January 29, 2014







|1 | CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit no A122227
|- | -----------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned in their respective capacities as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, each hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of thier knowledge:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Registrant.x



|Date:
    October  6, 2016 | /s/
    Xinrong Zhuo                                                                          
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           | Xinrong
        Zhuo
        Chairman of the Board and
        Chief
        Executive Officer
|                           |                                                                                               
|Date:
    October  6, 2016 | /s/
Roy Yu                                                                                    
|                           | Roy
    Yu
    Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-005-113193    -3-054-CV

THE CADLE COMPANY ANDVeErRnNoOnN WhHiIpPpPlLeE WeEsStTeErRnN ReEsSeEaArRcChH & MaAnNaAgGeEmMeEnNtT, LLC AND Colby L. Harlow and Harlow Capital Management, LLC	APPELLANTSS

AND CoOlLbByY L. HaArRlLoOwW aAnNdD HaArRlLoOwW Capital Management, LLC

CaApPiItTaAlL MaAnNaAgGeEmMeEnNtT, LLC

DANIEL C. CADLEVernon Whipple

	V.

DAVID B. LOBINGIER AND THER2 EeEnNtTeErRpPrRiIsSeEsS, IiInNcC. aAnNdD TtTeEdD RrReEeEvVeEsS CoOlLbByY L. HaArRlLoOwW aAnNdD HaArRlLoOwW CaApPiItTaAlL Management, LLC AND Western Research & Management, LLC	APPELLEESS

MaAnNaAgGeEmMeEnNtT, LLC AND WeEsStTeErRnN Research & Management, LLC

ReEsSeEaArRcChH & MaAnNaAgGeEmMeEnNtT, LLC

STATE OF TEXAS

	----------

	FROM THE 348TH348TH DISTRICT  48TH 158TH       158TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT           DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the THE the parties’ “aap“Joint Appellant’s Joint Motion tTo Dismiss for Mootness Appeal anAnd Cross Appaeal.”  Appeal Due To Settlement.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal fo of WWEeSsTtEeRrNn RREeSsEeAaRrCcHh & MMAaNnAaGgEeMmEeNnTt, LLC,  an d the cross appeal fof CCOoLlBbYy LL. HHAaRrLlOoWw AaNnDd HHAaRrLlOoWw 

CCAaPpIiTtAaLl MMAaNnAaGgEeMmEeNnTt,  LLC.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(21), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

2

PANEL DMDF:	  HOLAMMAN, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.m

MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2430, 2005December 31, 2003  SOctober 13, 2005