alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Samuel Rose v. John H. Palmer, Newaygo Circuit Judge.

*Attachment*— Default—Judgment—Mandamus.

Where judgment is rendered in an attachment suit for want of an appearance and plea, it cannot exceed the sum sworn as due in the affidavit (with interest), and if taken for a greater amount *mandamus*will lie to compel the granting of a new trial if the plaintiff fails to remit the excess.

*Mandamus.*

Submitted January 15, 1889.

Granted April 12, 1889.

Application for *mandamus*to require respondent to grant a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

*William D. Fuller,*for relator.

*George Luton*and *Edgar L. Gray,*for respondent.

Sherwood, C. J.

The petition in this case is for *mandamus*to require the circuit judge to grant a new trial in the case of *Luton v. Rose,*tried in the Newaygo circuit, wherein a judgment was obtained by default for $1,525.25.

The suit was commenced by attachment, which was levied upon land, and the writ was also personally served upon the defendant.

13381

*333The declaration was upon the common counts, the *ad damnum*being stated at $1,000. The plaintiff, against the objection of defendant, was allowed to remit the excess above the *ad damnum.*It was then ascertained that a draft of an affidavit of non-appearance of defendant had been filed before entering the default, which was not sworn to, and contained no jurat. The plaintiff, upon motion, was allowed to file an affidavit of nonappearance, properly sworn to, *nunc pro tunc.*The affidavit upon which the writ issued stated the amount of plaintiff’s claim at $640.25, and the relator, on the argument of Ms motion for a new trial, offered to allow judgment to stand against him for that amount.

The circuit judge denied the motion for a new trial, and we think he committed error in so doing. The grounds relied upon to obtain from this Court the order prayed for by relator are—

> 1. That Luton failed to file a proper affidavit of nonappearance of the defendant.

> 2. That, the judgment being taken by default, the recovery upon the assessment of damages should have been limited to' the amount stated in the affidavit.

It must be recollected there was no appearance in the case by the defendant, and the default entered was for not appearing and pleading. The defendant would not be likely to expect that the plaintiff would take judgment for more than the balance defendant owed him, which plaintiff had already sworn to, and we do not think the circuit judge should have allowed him to do so without a trial. It does not appear that plaintiff ever served the defendant with a copy of the declaration, or gave him any notice of assessment of damages, and, under the circumstances, we think justice requires that the judgment taken by plaintiff should be reduced to the amount sworn to in the affidavit for the writ of attach*334ment, and, if the plaintiff fails to consent to this reduction, a new trial should be granted, and *mandamus*must be granted as prayed.

Champlin, Morse, and Campbell, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases FY17 Air Force acquisition reportPublished March 13, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson released the fiscal year 2017 Air Force Acquisition Annual Report March 13, 2018. 
The report reviews the overall management of the Air Force's 465 programs of record. It also outlines where Air Force acquisition is headed in fiscal years 2018 and 2019. 
“The Air Force will cost-effectively modernize to increase the lethality of the force,” said Wilson. “That means we have to get great value for every dollar we spend.”
The report cites $13 billion in cost-savings since 2011, and highlights a number of initiatives the Air Force is taking to speed up the acquisition timeline, including streamlined decision-making authorities, increased prototyping and improved software acquisition. 
“Our acquisition workforce is strong, technically-skilled, and motivated to build and sustain the world's most lethal Air Force,” said Dr. William Roper, assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition technology and logistics. “Empowering people, not processes, will make Air Force acquisition a powerhouse of innovation and agility.” 
The Air Force identified acquisition excellence as a critical area of emphasis in addressing a 10-year bow wave of required modernization to address future threats. 
“We work closely with our industry partners to develop game-changing technology and capabilities which, when put in the hands of our Airmen, give us the combat edge to fly, fight and win," said Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein. 
A copy of the FY17 Air Force Acquisition report is available at http://www.af.mil/FY2017_AQReportFY17 



Air Force Acquisition Annual Report 



acquisition 



cost effective 



modernize 



innovation 



agility 



SAF 



SecAF 



decision making 



prototyping 



software Related Links
        FY 2017 Aquisition Annual Report
August 1 8, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GEORGE CASTILLO , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00019

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****EcologyCoatings, Inc..**CERTIFICATIONSI, **Richard D. Stromback**, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007 of EcologyCoatings, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:December 19, 2007   /s/ Richard D. Stromback   **Richard D. Stromback**  Chief Executive Officer
#### CHESTER FINDERS KEEPERS, INC. v. CHESTER SPRINGS ASSOCIATES AND COMMONWEALTH TRADING CO.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 17, 2010, Cambridge Isotope Lab, 50 Frontage Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Morphine (9300), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II. 

The company plans to utilize small quantities of the listed controlled substance in the preparation of analytical standards.

Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).

Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than November 1, 2010.

Dated: August 3, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-21739 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     011794-014.                

*Title:*                     COSCON/KL/YMUK/Hanjin Worldwide Slot Allocation & Sailing Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     COSCO Container Lines Company, Limited; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; and Yangming (UK) Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Robert B. Yoshitomi, Esq.; Nixon Peabody LLP; 555 West Fifth Street, 46th Floor; Los Angeles, CA 90013.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment updates references to EU law and permits less than the full membership to discuss and agree on matters authorized by the Agreement.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: August 27, 2010.

Rachel Dickon, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-21883 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT
JAM IE KIRKP AT RICK , individually , and as the natur al fathe r and le g al guar dian of B .W ., a m inor , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. CO U NT Y O F W ASH O E ; AM Y RE YNO L DS, W CDSS soc ial w or ke r ; E L L E N W IL CO X , W CDSS soc ial w or ke r ; L INDA K

E NNE D Y, W CDSS soc ial w or ke r , De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-15080 D.C . No. 3:09-c v-00600-EC R
VPC O R DE R

T H O M A S , C hie f Judge : Upon thevote of a

m a jority of nonre c use d

a c tive judge s, it is ordere d tha t this c a s e be re he ard e n ba n c pursua nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 35(a )
and C irc u it R

ule 35-3. The thre e -judge pa ne l opinion sha

ll not be c ite d a s pre c e de nt by

or to a ny c ourt of theNinth C irc uit. 

# FIL ED
FEB 17 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
News United States Air Force
 Stealth Guardian: FARP increases Air Force capabilitiesPublished Aug. 16, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Isaiah J. Soliz
                        
                        
                        325th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **MOODY AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS)  --**
                Airmen from the 325th Fighter Wing and the 23rd Wing were put to the test in a simulated deployed environment at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, as part of exercise Stealth Guardian, Aug. 10, 2017. Two F-22 Raptors from the 95th Fighter Squadron, at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, were rearmed and refueled by way of a forward air refueling point, or FARP,  from an HC-130J Combat King II. 
Stealth Guardian, a fusion of Rapid Raptor and Rapid Rescue, is designed to integrate and test Air Force assets through real-world exercise scenarios similar to those found in deployed settings or contingency environments. 
Rapid Raptor tests the ability of the Air Force to quickly deploy F-22 assets into a combat or contingency environment. 
“A FARP increases our ability to respond to any situation at a moment's notice,” said Capt. Josef ‘Hawg’, a 95th FS F-22 Raptor pilot. “It gives us the ability to operate out of austere locations which might otherwise be out of reach, thereby making us a much more efficient and flexible deployed force.”
In support of the exercise, Airmen, munitions and supplies were transported from Tyndall AFB via the HC-130J to the staging grounds at Moody AFB. Two F-22 landed, received fuel, were armed with munitions, and sent back on their way fully mission capable. 
“Rapid Raptor allows us to integrate with other platforms which we don't normally get the opportunity to train with,” Josef said. “This is important not only for learning about other platforms and teaching them about the Raptor, but it also teaches us as pilots how to handle unique challenges presented by taking the F-22 off station where support assets may be limited.”
Integrating Rapid Raptor and Rapid Rescue showcases the interoperability of both the 23rd and 325th Wings while allowing Airmen the opportunity to train in real-world scenarios that are out of routine. 
“This training is important because it allows us to practice and perfect a new skill set that will allow us to provide air dominance anywhere in the world on short notice, and with limited assets,” Josef said. “It increases flexibility and ultimately makes us a more capable and lethal fighting force.”**Editor’s note: Full names have been left out for operational security purposes.*Stealth Guardian 



Rapid Raptor 



Rapid Rescue 



95th Fighter Squadron 



F-22 Raptor 



Moody Air Force Base 



325th Fighter Wing 



23d Wing
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           NATIONAL SUPERSTARS, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Superstars, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter Porath, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
May 18, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5737]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    RECESS UNTIL 9:30 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I now ask unanimous consent that, in further respect 
of the passing of the Senator from Mississippi, Senator John Stennis, 
the Senate stand in recess under the provision of Senate Resolution 
111.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 9:10 p.m, recessed until 
Thursday, April 27, 1995, at 9:30 a.m.
```
News United States Air Force
 Sustaining Global SupremacyPublished April 24, 2019
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson talks about adaptation and innovation in the Air Force throughout its history and how both play a key role in sustaining global supremacy. The speech was given Feb 28, 2019, at the Air Warfare Symposium in Orlando, Florida.

</iframe

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **Air Force SBIR\STTR / Air Force Pitch Day**
- **AFWERX**SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



military 



innovation 



national security 



science 



air power 



innovate 



rapid 



drive innovation 



faster smarter 



Supremacy
News United States Air Force
 Changes to Post-9/11 GI Bill transfers effective July 2019Published May 11, 2019
                        
                        
                        445th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The transferability option under the Post-9/11 GI Bill allows service members to transfer all or some unused benefits to their spouse or dependent children. The request to transfer unused GI Bill benefits to eligible dependents must be completed while serving as an active member of the Armed Forces. The Department of Defense determines whether or not you can transfer benefits to your family. Once the DoD approves benefits for transfer, the new beneficiaries apply for them at Veterans Affairs.
The option to transfer is open to any member of the armed forces active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and meets the following criteria:
• Has at least six years of service in the armed forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of approval and agrees to serve four additional years in the armed forces from the date of election.
• Has at least 10 years of service in the armed forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of approval, is precluded by either standard policy (by service branch or DoD) or statute from committing to four additional years and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute.
• Transfer requests are submitted and approved while the member is in the armed forces.
• Effective 7/12/2019, eligibility to transfer benefits will be limited to service members with at least 6 years but not more than 16 years of active duty or selected reserve service. So service members with more than 16 years of service should transfer benefits before 7/12/2019.
For more information, go to **https://www.benefits.va.gov/gibill/post911_transfer.asp**.AFWN 



Post-9/11 GI Bill 



service members 



transfer 



eligible 



dependents 



Department of Defense 



DOD 



veterans affairs 



armed forces 



active duty 



Selected Reserve 



officer 



enlisted 



AF 



Air Force 



education 



college 



benefits
STEVEN EARL KIMMONS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0963

Opinion filed May 2, 2017. 

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Steven Earl Kimmons, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is granted. Case 

numbers 1D16-0204 and 1D16-0206 are hereby reinstated. Within 30 days of the date 

of the issuance of this opinion, the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional 

Counsel shall file either the initial briefs or notices of designation of the Public 

Defender in the appeals. 

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Heavy Airlift Wing Service Medal / Guardsman saves lifePublished Feb. 19, 2019
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Greg Cerny
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                On this look Around the Air Force, U.S. Air Forces in Europe has approved the Heavy Airlift Wing Service Medal, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base brings back Integrated Combat Turns, and a Guardsman is awarded the Airman’s Medal for saving a life. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Greg Cerny.</iframeFor previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:- **Foreign award can now be presented to Airmen in Hungary**- **Air Force ICTs make a comeback**- **MacDill Guardsman saves life, receives Airman’s Medal**
 ATAF Air Force TV Around the Air Force Featured Videos AF Reports Staff Sgt Greg Cerny Heavy Airlift Wing Service Medal USAFE Hungary Davis-MonthanAFB Arizona A-10 ICT Integrated Combat Turns guardsman lifesaver Airman’s Medal