alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10130

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSVALDO SANCHEZ GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:00-CR-83-11-H)

_________________________________________________________________

October 15, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Osvaldo Sanchez Garcia appeals his convictions for conspiracy

to possess, and possession, with intent to distribute narcotics,

see 18 U.S.C. § 2, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846,

asserting that the evidence was insufficient.

Because Garcia did not renew his motion for judgment of

acquittal at the close of all the evidence, we need only determine

whether there was a “manifest miscarriage of justice”, which “would

exist only if the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt”.

United States v. Hinojosa, 958 F.2d 624, 628 (5th Cir. 1992)
(quoting United States v. Robles-Pantoja, 887 F.2d 1250, 1254 (5th

Cir. 1989)).

The trial testimony indicated that Garcia’s coconspirators

left him alone in a hotel room with a large quantity of cocaine.

See United States v. Garcia-Flores, 246 F.3d 451, 455 (5th Cir.

2001); United States v. Arzola-Amaya, 867 F.2d 1504, 1512-13 (5th

Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 933 (1989). He was present in

the hotel room and witnessed his coconspirators test the cocaine

supply and turn it into crack. Garcia was present during

negotiations for a drug deal. Moreover, a jury reasonably could

have concluded from the testimony of Leopoldo Camacho Perez that

Garcia participated in the negotiation process. See United States

v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1488-89 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516

U.S. 1064 (1996), and cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 (1996). Finally,

an Agent from the Drug Enforcement Agency testified that secretly

recorded telephone conversations indicated that Garcia was the

source of the cocaine supply. 

In short, the record is not devoid of evidence pointing to

guilt; far from it. In fact, the evidence was adequate to support

Garcia’s conviction. See United States v. Gonzales, 121 F.3d 928,

935-36 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1063 (1998), and

cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1131 (1998); United States v. PenaRodriguez, 110 F.3d 1120, 1123-24 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied,

522 U.S. 819 (1997). 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 3.1.1
 
 
   Classes and Number of Shares
  Reverse Stock Split




---



##### 



1.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]2.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]3.
    
    For the purpose of this Certificate of Incorporation,
Continuing Directors means directors elected to the Board of the
Corporation as of April 24, 2009 and any new directors whose election by
the Corporations Board of Directors or whose nomination for election by
the stockholders of the Corporation was approved by a vote of a majority
of the directors then still in office.




---



##### 



WESTWOOD ONE, INC.By:

/s/
David HillmanName:
    David HillmanTitle:
    CAO and GC
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Westwood  One,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Jacques Tortoroli,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/S/ Jacques Tortoroli
---------------------
Jacques Tortoroli
August  6, 2003

This statement is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission as
an exhibit to this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         747,362
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  873
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    33,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,011,286
<PP&E>                                         1,116,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (767,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,471,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          513,038
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    533,250
<COMMON>                                       8,504
<OTHER-SE>                                     383,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,471,457
<SALES>                                        1,581,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,610,887
<CGS>                                          422,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  914,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               241,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                93,684
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   38,564
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00



</TABLE>
#### SINKERS, INC. v. LEWIS C. STANLEY AND GEORGE T. MCMAHON.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 18, 2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2827

 To amend section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 
             Federal student aid from taxable gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2014

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Murphy) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 
             Federal student aid from taxable gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Make Student Grants Truly Tax-Free 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 117(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``received by an individual as a 
        scholarship'' and inserting ``received by an individual--
                    ``(A) as a scholarship'',
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
        comma, and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
                    ``(B) through a scholarship or fellowship grant 
                program administered by the Secretary of Education that 
                is based on financial need, including a Federal Pell 
                Grant under section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 
                1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a), or
                    ``(C) as an Iraq and Afghanistan Service Grant 
                under section 420R of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
                (20 U.S.C. 1070h).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4520]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                NEW DEREGULATION FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS

  (Mr. STEARNS asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. STEARNS. Mr. Speaker, I just wanted to advise and introduce to 
the Members that we had a telecommunications press conference today 
offered through the Committee on Commerce a new deregulatory bill which 
will allow mass communications to change dramatically, and I had the 
honor to offer as an amendment to this bill new broadcast ownership 
changes to allow many new forms of ownership for video broadcasting. It 
is bipartisan bill.
  Basically it reduces restrictions on ownership of broadcasting 
stations and other media mass communications. As I mentioned, it 
repeals antiquated rules and regulations and brings broadcasting up to 
date with technology. The bill states that the FCC does not provide or 
enforce any regulations concerning cross ownership. The details of this 
will be in a statement that I will put in the extension of my remarks 
today.

                          ____________________
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1655

_____________________________

JEFFERY L. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

June 27, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jeffery L. Williams, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6147** 

TOMMY J. GRAHAM, JR. , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00922

- CMH

- IDD )

Submitted : September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tommy J. Graham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tommy J. Graham, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the meri ts, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Graham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becaus e the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 DE L AWA RE SEAL VIROBAY, INC. CORPORATE May 18, 2006 Fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock,
$0.001 par value, OF ViroBay, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent
and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: This certifies that is the record holder of Incorporat ed under the law s of the stat e of delawar e
CUSIP 92823J 100 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS Countersigned and Registered: American Stock transfer & trust company, LLC (New York, NY) Transfer Agent and Registrar By: Authorized signat ure PRESIDENT & Chief Executive Officer Chief
Financial & Accounting Officer VB ViroBay 








 



 
 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the powers, designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the
Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations: Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants
in common COM PROP – as community property UNIF GIFT MIN ACT –Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT –Custodian (until age) (Cust) under Uniform Transfers (Minor) to Minors Act (State) FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE shares of the capital stock represented by within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of the substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. By THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS
WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED. Signature(s) Guaranteed: (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE
NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) X X
EXHIBIT 3.8


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                               WESTWOOD ONE, INC.

Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

                          ____________________________


     THE  UNDERSIGNED,  being an  authorized  officer of Westwood One, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:

     FIRST: The name of the Company is Westwood One, Inc.

     SECOND:  The  original  Certificate  of  Incorporation  was filed  with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 21, 1985.

     THIRD: The fifth sentence of Article Eighth,  "Directors elected by holders
of Common Stock  pursuant to paragraph (a) of Section 2 of Article  Fourth shall
be members of Class III.", shall be deleted in its entirety.

     FOURTH:  The foregoing  amendment of Article Eighth has been authorized and
approved by  stockholders  of the Company,  entitled to vote and  representing a
majority of the voting power,  in accordance  with the provisions of Section 242
of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State of  Delaware  and the  Company's
amended Certificate of Incorporation.

     FIFTH:  This  Certificate  of Amendment  shall be effective upon its filing
with the Sectary of State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Westwood One, Inc. has caused this  certificate to be
signed by Gary J. Yusko, its Secretary, this 23rd day of July 2002.

                                                  WESTWOOD ONE, INC.



                                                  By: /S/ Gary J. Yusko
                                                      -----------------
                                                  Name:    Gary J. Yusko
                                                  Title:   Senior Vice President
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: JADC-2 Emergence, Space Force Civilian Jobs, Tyndall AFB UpdatePublished Feb. 7, 2020
                        
                        By Senior Airman Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                Today’s look Around the Air Force features an update on Joint All Domain Command and Control, or JADC-2, Space Force civlilian employment information and a Tyndall Air Force Base update. (Hosted by Senior Airman Angelo Rosario)  For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:-Goldfein offers optimistic update on Air Force’s evolution and future- U.S. Space Force seeks civilians to join staff- Tyndall AFB leadership share "Installation of the Future" visionAFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



USAF 



Airmen 



Featured Videos 



JADC2 



CSAF 



Joint Domain Operations 



space force 



employment 



hiring 



civilians 



Tyndall Air Force Base 



Tyndall 



update 



hurricane
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, February 8, 2010.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 29, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-2226 Filed 1ndash;29-10; 11:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S