alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Schneiderman, Chief Financial Officer of Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. (the Corporation), hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | a. | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 29, 2013

(signed) Mark SchneidermanName: Mark Schneiderman
Title: Chief Financial Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the
Corporations Annual Report on Form 40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00036-CV

Style: In the Interest of R.N.W.

Date motion filed*: February 22, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to extend time for filing brief on appeal

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time:

Deadline to file document:

Number of previous extensions granted:

Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the brief is DISMISSED as moot. Because the record is 

not complete in this appeal, the brief is not yet due.

Appellant is presumed indigent. The Harris County District Clerk is ORDERED to file the 

complete clerk’s record in this appeal within 5 days of the date of this order. No extensions will 

be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

Because this is a termination case, the Court is required to bring this appeal to final disposition 

within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See Tex. 

R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West Supp. 2012). 

For this reason, appellant’s attorney is informed that the brief will be due 20 days after the clerk’s 

record is filed, and no extensions of time to file the brief will be granted absent extraordinary 

circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). 

Judge's signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: February 27, 2013
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2021

No. 04-21-00301-CR

Robert Michael Eugene WILKINS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B20-175

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After this court’s granted Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file the 

brief, Appellant’s brief was due on December 22, 2021. On the once-extended due date, 

Appellant moved for an additional thirty days to file the brief. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on January 21, 2022. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
|Exhibit 4.76
|------------
|            
|            
|            
|            

This is an English Translation



Spousal Consent
Letter



I, Chunxia He (ID No:    ), as the legal
spouse of Jianming Dong (ID No:    ), hereby unconditionally agree that the equity interests of Beijing Star World Technology Company
Limited, owned by and registered under name of my spouse, is disposed in accordance with the arrangements under Loan Agreement,
Equity, Equity Disposition Agreement and Equity Pledge Agreement dated as of April 26, 2012 and other supplementary agreements
to be signed from time to time.



I further guarantee not to take any
action at any time with an intention conflicting against the above-identified arrangements, including making a claim to court or
other competent authorities that such equity interests constitute the property or community property between my spouse and me.
I, unconditionally and irrevocably, hereby waive any and all rights or benefits granted to me with relation to such equity interests
under applicable laws and confirm that in no event such equity interests constitute any community property between my spouse and
me.



| |                     |               
| | ------------------- | --------------
| | Name of the Spouse: | /s/ Chunxia He
| |                     | Chunxia He    
| | ID No:              |               
| | Date                | April 26, 2012



Witness:





/s/ Mingzhe Zhou

_______________________

Mingzhe Zhou









/s/ Qiuhua Xu

_______________________

Qiuhua Xu
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4438]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      SENATE ENROLLED BILLS SIGNED

  The SPEAKER announced his signature to enrolled bills of the Senate 
of the following titles:

       S. 178. An act to amend the Commodity Exchange Act to 
     extend the authorization for the Commodity Futures Trading 
     Commission, and for other purposes; and
       S. 244. An act to further the goals of the Paperwork 
     Reduction Act to have Federal agencies become more 
     responsible and publicly accountable for reducing the burden 
     of Federal paperwork on the public, and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Zhang Yue, certify, as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations at the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date: December 16, 2015  By:/s/   Zhang YueZhang YueChief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I,  Jay P. Shepard, certify that: 

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Versartis, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: April 9, 2018 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Jay P. Shepard                                                    |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   |   | Jay P. Shepard                                                        |
|                |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |
#### MITCHELL *v.*LAMBERT.

This case is governed by the decision *of*the court in *Waters*v. *Kopp,*ante, 575.

No. 2055.

Submitted February 4, 1910.

Decided .March 8, 1910.

Hearing on an appeal from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sitting as a court of equity, vacating an assignment of a life insurance policy and directing distribution of the proceeds thereof.

*Appeal dismissed.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr.-John Ridout*for the appellant.

*Mr. W. J. Lambert*and *Mr. Rudolph II. Yeatma/n*for the appellee.

Mr. Associate Justice Gould,

of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, who sat with the Court in the hearing and determination of the case in the place of Mr., Justice Van Obsdel, delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal taken by John Mitchell, Jr., guardian *ad litem,*on behalf of John Edward Waters [an infant] from so much of the decree in the case of *Waters*v. *Kopp,*ante, 575, as directs the payment of said infant’s share of the fund to the administratrix of his deceased father instead of to the infant itself. As the general decree has heen reversed in the appeal in No. 2054 [ante, 575] which determined the rights of all the parties, including the appellant in this case, which was submit*584ted and heard with the other, it is ordered for the reasons given in the opinion in that case that this appeal be, and it ia hereby, dismissed, with costs. *Dismissed**
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Russell Aaron Hester v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00764

- CR

Trial court case number: 17

- CR

- 2105

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

The State’s brief was originally due on November 26, 2018. The Court granted two

extensions until February 27, 2019. When the Court granted the last extension, the Court warned

that no further extensions would be granted.

On February 27, 2019, the State requested a third extension. The motion for extension is

denied . The State’s brief is due on or before March 8, 2019 . No extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Justice Richard Hightower

_______________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _ March 5, 2019

__
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Westwood  One,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Joel  Hollander,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   the report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/S/ JOEL HOLLANDER
------------------
Joel Hollander
May 14, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BACHE, HALSEY, STUART, SHIELDS, INC. v. MYUNG GOOK JANG.

March 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000-LXSITRST0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey; Minnesota, stayed.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Friday, July 9, 2010, there was published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , Volume 75, Number 131, on page 39579 a notice entitled “Eastern States: Filing of Plats of Survey”. In said notice was a plat depicting the dependent resurvey of a portion of the South and West boundaries, a portion of the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of Sections 28-33, and the survey of a tract of land in Section 31 and adjusted record meanders in Sections 31 and 32, in Township 114 North, Range 15 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota. These were accepted June 22, 2010.                    

The official filing of the plat is hereby stayed, pending consideration of all protests.

Dated: August 30, 2010.

Dominica Van Koten,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 2010-22459 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
News United States Air Force
 AF Week in PhotosPublished June 22, 2018
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week's photos feature Airmen from around the globe involved in activities supporting expeditionary operations and defending America. This weekly feature showcases the men and women of the Air Force.air 



force 



Week 



In 



Photos 



photography 



Aircraft 



Thunderbirds 



B-1 



B-52 



bomber 



martial arts 



refuel 



cargo 



joint 



Service 



aircrew 



honor 



guard 



CSAF 



Air Force 



chief 



of 



staff 



F-22 



f-16 



F-15 



aeromedical 



evacuation 



F-35 Lightning II 



F-35 Related Links
        Air Force Week in Photos Archive
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6375

DERRICK A. EDWARDS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

K. KING, River North Investigator; T. PHIFER, River North Counselor; H. 

COLNA, River North Lieutenant; S. PEEPLES, River North Sergeant,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

MURRAY,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:21-cv-00047-MFU-JCH)

Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6375 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Derrick A. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6375 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Derrick A. Edwards appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment 

in Appellees’ favor on his claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized 

Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Edwards v. King, No. 7:21-cv-00047-MFU-JCH 

(W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6375 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1



March 13, 2020

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re: Certification pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with
the Annual Report of SandRidge Permian Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its
individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



The above certification
is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



| | By: | /s/ SARAH NEWELL                                                                                                     
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Sarah Newell                                                                                                         
| |     | Vice President
        The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee
        of SandRidge Permian Trust
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6386

HAMMEL J. CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DENISE GELSINGER; LIEUTENANT LARRY C. BENNETT; CO II ALICIA A. 

CARTWRIGHT; SERGEANT JASON A. DADDYSMAN; WARDEN RICHARD 

J. GRAHAM; SERGEANT THOMAS MENGES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00921-TDC)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hammel J. Clark, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hammel J. Clark seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not 

all, of Clark’s claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Clark seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of WireCo WorldGroup Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Keith McKinnish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ J. Keith McKinnish                                                   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | J. Keith McKinnish, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)