alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-259

_____________________________

MONTRELL D. GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James O. Shelfer, Judge.

August 1, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Montrell D. Green, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Elizabeth M. van den Berg, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### McLAWHORN v. R.B.R. & S.T.

No. 294P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 347

Petition by third party defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 July 2001.
Order filed, March 1, 2018.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-18-00081-CV

AES VALVES, LLC AND IES INTERNATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES, LTD., 

Appellant

V.

KOBI INTERNATIONAL, INC. DBA KOBI GROUP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2016-61999

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 02/26/2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal, 

if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3274

___________ Brenda Crawford, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Boone County, Missouri; O.J. Stone, * Western District of Missouri individually & in his capacity as an * employee of the Boone Cty. Sheriff & s * [UNPUBLISHED] Dep't., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 4, 1999 Filed: March 26, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
BrendaCrawford appeals from the final judgment entered in the United States DistrictCourt 1 for the Western District of Missouri. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants in Crawford & s employment discrimination action,-2-

in which Crawford claimed that defendants sexually harassed and subjected her to disparate treatment based on her sex and age, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.

After de novo review, see Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. , 88 F.3d 672, 674 (8th Cir. 1996), we conclude summary judgment was proper because Crawford failed to file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 300 days of any alleged discriminatory employment practice, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e); Hanenburg v. Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co. , 118 F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir. 1997) (plaintiff may not assert Title VII claim unless she has filed timely EEOC charge); cf. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co. , 130 F.3d 1287, 1302- 03 (8th Cir. 1997) (alleged violation may be deemed continuing where plaintiff challen ges ongoing pattern or practice of discrimination, but plaintiff must establish violation existed during statutory period), cer t. denied , 118 S. Ct. 2370 (1998). We agree with the district court that Crawford failed to show circumstances that warranted equitable tolling of the 300-day filing period. See Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown , 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984) (per curiam) (listing four ci rcumstances that warrant equitable tolling); Millerv. Runyon , 32 F.3d 386, 390 (8th Cir. 1994) (reviewing for clear error district court’s findings of facts underlying equitable tolling claim). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We deny plaintiff & s and defendants’ pending motions on appeal. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.-3-
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of CenterStaging Corp. on Form 10-KSB/A for
      the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Howard
      Livingston, the Chief Financial Officer of CenterStaging, Inc., does hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section .1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of
      and
      for the periods covered by the Report.




Dated:
      October 27, 2006





/s/
      Howard Livingston


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of Reebok International Ltd. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:



|                   |  | /s/PAUL FIREMANPaul Fireman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 3, 2005 |  |                                                                 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reebok International Ltd. and will be retained by Reebok International Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TAMMY MELANSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3001

[ May 21, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 562018CF000875A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin

, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Matthew W.
Shankle


Matthew
W. Shankle


President,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer





November
18, 2008
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549


                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

                      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 22, 2000


                                   AROC Inc.
            ------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


          Delaware                  000-28463                    74-2932492
----------------------------       ------------              -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction       (Commission                 (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)             File Number)              Identification No.)

4200 East Skelly Drive, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma                  74135
---------------------------------------------------                ----------
     (Address of principal executive offices)                      (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (918) 491-1100
                                                    ----------------------------


     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure
         ------------------------

     The registrant previously announced that its senior management had proposed
to the board of directors that the board consider a transaction to acquire for
cash, in an amount to be determined by the board of directors, all of the shares
of its common stock held by persons other than AROC's largest stockholders.
After discussions with the independent members of the registrant's board of
directors and the registrant's largest shareholder following that announcement,
management determined that  it would not be practical to complete such a
transaction.  Therefore, management has withdrawn the proposal.

     In addition,  Messrs. Phillip Douglas, William J.A. Kennedy and John R.
Martinson resigned as directors of the registrant and three directors were
elected to fill the vacancies created by the resignations.  The three directors
elected are Robert L. Zorich, Gary R. Petersen and D. Martin Phillips.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated December 22, 2000.

                                  AROC Inc.

                                  By:   /s/ John A. Keenan
                                      -------------------------
                                        John A. Keenan,
                                        Chief Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 F-35As deploy to Estonia for the first timePublished April 25, 2017
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa
                **ÄMARI AIR BASE, Estonia (AFNS)   --**
                Two F-35A Lightning II aircraft and about 20 supporting Airmen arrived at Ämari Air Base April 25, 2017, from Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England.
The F-35As are participating in their first training deployment to Europe. The aircraft and total force Airmen are from the 34th Fighter Squadron and the Air Force Reserve’s 466th Fighter Squadron at Hill Air Force Base, Utah.
The deployment has been planned for some time, has no relations to current events, and was conducted in close coordination with Estonian allies. It allows the F-35A to engage in familiarization training within the European theater while reassuring allies and partners of U.S. dedication to the enduring peace and stability of the region.
This deployment maximizes training opportunities with our allies and partners and serves as a visible demonstration of the United States’ resolve to support NATO assurance measures.
This is the first overseas flying training deployment for the F-35A, signifying an important milestone and natural progression of the Joint Strike Fighter Program. It is the perfect opportunity for the combat-ready aircraft to train alongside U.S. and allied aircraft in a realistic training environment while demonstrating its operational capabilities. Also, it helps to integrate with NATO’s infrastructure and enhance fifth-generation aircraft interoperability.
The aircraft and Airmen began arriving in Europe on April 15, and are scheduled to remain in Estonia for a brief period of time before returning to RAF Lakenheath to continue their training deployment.
To see photos and videos of the deployment, click **here**.Ämari Air Base 



Estonia 



RAF Lakenheath 



England 



USAFE 



AFAFRICA 



F-35 



joint 



Allies 



training 



stability 



ACC 



KC-135 



RAF Mildenhall Related Links
        F-35A Lightning II joint strike fighter aircraft arrive in Europe
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Breaking silence: Shattering the taboo of mental health 

              - Published  May 15, 2023
              -                             By Capt. Nicholas Choy                                                    
              - 42nd Operational Medical Readiness Squadron

**MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS)  --  **

May is Mental Health Awareness Month, a time to raise awareness about the importance of mental health and to reduce the stigma that surrounds mental illness.As members of the Air Force community, it’s important that we prioritize our mental health and encourage others to do the same. 

Mental health is just as critical to overall well-being as physical health. It’s common for people to focus on physical health and neglect their mental health but this can have serious consequences. Untreated mental illness can lead to problems such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse and suicide. The Air Force community faces unique challenges that can affect mental health. Deployment, long hours and high-stress situations can take a toll on our mental well-being. It’s crucial to recognize when we’re struggling and to seek help when we need it. There are many resources available to help maintain mental health in the Air Force.******Military OneSource******is a free resource that offers confidential counseling and support to service members and their families. The Air Force also offers mental health services through the chaplain,******Military and Family Life Counselors**, Outpatient Behavioral Health and the installation mental health clinic. 

In addition to seeking professional help, there are steps we can take to maintain our mental health. Exercise, healthy eating and getting adequate sleep are all important for both physical and mental health. Practicing mindfulness and stress-management techniques can also help us cope with stress and anxiety. 

It’s essential to remember that mental health is a key component of overall readiness. By taking care of our mental health, we are better equipped to meet the challenges we face as members of the Air Force family. 

This Mental Health Awareness Month. Let’s prioritize our mental health and encourage others to do the same. Together, we can reduce the stigma surrounding mental illness and ensure that everyone has access to the resources they need to maintain their mental well-being. 

*Capt. Nicholas Choy is a Board-Certified Psychiatrist and Medical Director of Mental Health Clinic at the 42nd Medical Group, Maxwell Air Force Base. *U.S. Air Force Logo

LRUSAFAFAir ForceMental healthMental health awareness monthreadinessresilienceMaxwell AFBstigmaMilitary OneSourceMFLCmindfulness
News United States Air Force
 USSTRATCOM, German air force sign liaison officer agreementPublished June 6, 2017
                        
                        
                        U.S. Strategic Command Public Affairs
                **OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) and the German air force (Luftwaffe) signed a memorandum of agreement June 1, 2017, to assign a German liaison officer (LNO) to Joint Functional Component Command for Space.
The agreement builds on the arrangement the two countries formalized in 2015 to enable and enhance each nation’s awareness within the space domain and increase the safety of spaceflight. 
U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Clinton E. Crosier, the USSTRATCOM director of plans and policy, and German air force Brig. Gen. Burkhard Pototzky, the department head and head of the Luftwaffe Operations Center, signed the memorandum in Uedem, Germany.
“The liaison officer, in collaboration with JFCC Space and other sharing partners as appropriate, will provide Germany’s perspective on sharing and collaboration requirements,” said Crosier. “This partnership, the first of hopefully many, will inform the development of the Multinational Space Collaboration effort at Vandenberg AFB, California.”
The German officer will be the first international liaison officer assigned to JFCC Space under the new Multinational Space Collaboration effort, announced April 5. The effort will explore mutual capabilities and identify opportunities for greater integration by colocating additional allies and partners with U.S. space operators. 
The LNO will be colocated with the 18th Space Control Squadron, providing direct input on space situational awareness sharing with Germany. The LNO will also be included in general planning and mutual training opportunities.
“While not expected to participate in Joint Space Operations Center operations or other combined operations directly, the German LNO, and others who follow, will share insight and recommendations to improve bilateral and multilateral relationships,” said Rear Adm. Brian Brown, the JFCC Space deputy commander. “We are optimistic that increased collaboration with ally and partner nations could lead to appropriate levels of combined space operations in the future.”
One of nine Defense Department unified combatant commands, USSTRATCOM has global strategic missions assigned through the Unified Command Plan that include strategic deterrence, space operations, cyberspace operations, joint electronic warfare, global strike, missile defense, intelligence, and analysis and targeting.DOD 



Department of Defense 



Vandenberg AFB 



Offutt AFB 



USSTRATCOM 



JFCC Space 



Allies 



German air force 



Joint Functional Component Command for Space 



Multinational Space Collaboration effort 



18th Space Control Squadron 



18th SCS 



unified combatant commands 



unified command plan 



U.S. Strategic Command
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 9, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.8 Saving and Investment by Sector 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Selection Board Secretariat releases 2018 board schedulePublished May 31, 2017
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Selection Board Secretariat has released the calendar year 2018 selection board schedule.
The schedule includes dates for master, senior master and chief master sergeant evaluation boards, senior NCO supplemental boards, officer selection boards and the command screening board.
Board timing can be impacted by changes in year group sizes and the need to stay within statutory limits for eligibility and grade in each rank. This adjustment ensures all officers in the year groups being considered will have the legally required three years' time-in-grade when meeting their primary zone promotion board.
To see the schedule, go to the Air Force Personnel Center Selection Board page of the AFPC public website and scroll down to the selection board records section. The schedule is also posted to myPers. Select “Any” from the dropdown menu and search “CY18 Board Schedule.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.selection 



schedule 



selection board 



AFPC 



master 



senior master 



chief master 



evaluation board 



Senior NCO 



officer 



promotion
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (809)
<INVENTORY>                                     17,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,461
<PP&E>                                         157,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,223)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,516
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,660
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,912
<SALES>                                        101,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,117
<CGS>                                           85,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                       493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,414)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE HAGOPIAN.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.