alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40281 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARIO VENTURA, also known as Moises Ventura , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09

- CR

- 2192

- 1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ventura has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ventura h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40281 Document: 00512473191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13

- 40281

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40281 Document: 00512473191 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

VINCENT J. CANTERA,

Petitioner

v.

WORLEY & OBETZ (WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 475 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Order filed September 3, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00549-CV

____________

ABDUL ZAVERI, Appellant

V.

FONDREN SOUTHWEST TEMPOS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-57726

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed June 24, 2015. To date, the filing 

fee of $195.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established 

indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before September 18, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2523 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2523

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14 3rd Avenue, NW., in Chisholm, Minnesota, as the ``James L. 
               Oberstar Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES L. OBERSTAR MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14 3rd Avenue, NW., in Chisholm, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James L. 
Oberstar Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate December 3, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2523

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14 3rd Avenue, NW., in Chisholm, Minnesota, as the ``James L. 
               Oberstar Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of C&J Energy Services, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall C. McMullen, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Randall C. McMullen, Jr.
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Randall C. McMullen, Jr.    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Joseph Tansey, Chief Executive Officer of Garrison Capital Inc., certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Garrison Capital Inc.; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a)

          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)

          [Omitted]; c)

          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)

          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)

          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)

          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 12, 2014 By:

          /s/ Joseph Tansey Joseph Tansey Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002






I,
      Arthur
      N. Robins, Chief Executive Officer of Encompass Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended December
      31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      March 21, 2007




/s/
      Arthur N. Robins


Arthur
      N.
      Robins


Chief
      Executive Officer
827 A.2d 292

#### DISCOVER BANK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES B. SHEA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Submitted May 28, 2003

Decided June 11, 2003.

Before Judges STERN, COBURN and COLLESTER.

*Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll,*and *Mark J. Levin*of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellant *0Glenn*A *Harris,*of counsel and on the brief).

*Strange & Carpenter,*and *Samuel C. Inglese,*of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent *{Brian R. Strange,*on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Law Division dismissing its complaint on the grounds that defendant’s agreement to arbitrate disputes with plaintiff, prohibiting participation in a class action, was not enforceable in New Jersey. Defendant, a New Jersey resident, instituted an action against plaintiff in California, on behalf of a class of Discover Card credit holders, seeking relief for allegedly improper fees and charges.

While plaintiffs appeal was pending before us, we conducted a telephone conference with counsel as a result of communications requesting an adjournment of this action by virtue of a possible settlement in California. The matter was adjourned with the understanding that if the California trial judge approved the settlement, the appeal would be dismissed without prejudice to reinstatement if the trial judge subsequently rejected the settlement after hearing from members of the aggrieved class.

*91We have now been advised that on April 10, 2003, the Superior Court of California, *County of*Orange, granted a motion preliminarily approving settlement of the class action. Plaintiff was directed to mail or cause to be mailed the settlement notice to members of plaintiffs class, and a “Formal Fairness Hearing to determine whether there exists any reasonable basis why the settlement should not be approved as being fair, reasonable, adequate, lawful, and in the best interests of the Plaintiff Class” was scheduled for September 18, 2003. Accordingly, consistent with the parties’ agreement, confirmed by letter of April 25, 2003, we dismiss the appeal, without costs, subject to reinstatement in the event that, after the “Formal Fairness Hearing” in the Superi- or Court of California, the trial judge does not approve the settlement or for any other reason the settlement does not become final.

So ordered.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 20.9

                                                              ------------------
[LOGO]    LETTERHEAD LML Payment Systems                         news release
                                                              ------------------

                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AMENDS DISMISSAL

VANCOUVER, BC, February 23, 2001 - Further to a news release dated January 2,
2001, LML PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. (the "Corporation") (Nasdaq: LMLP), reports that
the United States District Court, Western District of Washington, on the basis
of a motion by Todd H. Moore, amended its original judgment of June 5, 2000 from
a dismissal with prejudice to a dismissal without prejudice. As a result of the
court's action, Todd H. Moore is no longer precluded from bringing the suit he
initiated in the 150th District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Corporation
continues to believe this lawsuit is without merit and it intends to vigorously
defend these claims.

Statements contained in this news release which are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements, subject to uncertainties and risks. For a discussion
of the risks associated with the Corporation's business, please see the
documents filed by the Corporation with the SEC.

                                     -30-

CONTACTS:      Patrick H. Gaines
               President and CEO             Investor Relations
               LML Payment Systems Inc.      LML Payment Systems Inc.
               (604) 689-4440                (800) 888-2260
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133517 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133517 

 COA: 273477 

Genesee CC: 04-013795-FC 

EDWARD DONALD BURLEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02050-BNB

MICHAEL KEITH TIVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MS. JOANN STOCK (Physician Assistant),

MR. KEVIN MILYARD (Warden), and

MS. BEVERLY DOWIS (Medical Administrator),

Defendants.

ORDER ASSIGNING CASE

On completion of the court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, it

appears that this case is not appropriate for summary dismissal and that the case

should be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR

8.2D. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., the case will be assigned to Judge Philip

A. Brimmer and to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer pursuant

to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya.

DATED November 1, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB Document 4 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Christopher Douglas Cornett, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR23048.

Vs. No. 11-16-00124-CR * May 31, 2018

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41053

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ ANTONIO REVILLA-MORENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-98-CR-369-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for José Antonio Revilla-Moreno has

moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel has also

filed a supplemental brief. Revilla-Moreno has filed three pro

se motions in response, seeking appointment of substitute

counsel. Our independent review of the briefs, Revilla-Moreno’s

motions, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. The

record has not been adequately developed for us to consider 
No. 98-41053

-2-

Revilla-Moreno’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on

direct appeal. See United States v. Haese, 162 F. 3d 359, 363-64

(5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1795 (1999). 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

all pro se motions are DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fast Eddie Racing Stables,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 1998 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A. Little,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 4, 2004                           By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                              -----------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fast Eddie Racing  Stables,  Inc. and will be retained by Fast Eddie
Racing Stables,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT      31.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

| 1.     |   | I                have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CEVA, Inc. (the                “Company”); and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     |   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |

|                                |                                   |                                    |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                           |                              |                               |
| Date:                April 28, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Gideon              Wertheizer |
|                                | Gideon                Wertheizer       |
|                                | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

s1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147200

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147200

COA: 314075

Macomb CC: 2011-000373-FC

JIMMY LEE SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 15, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0475 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSEPH ALTON HAFLICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including December 22 , 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 15 2021

11/15/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0475
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DIMOKRITOS G. DIMOPLON.

March 19, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.