alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-03-0541-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

FEBRUARY 4, 2004

______________________________

BRUCE D. CARRINGTON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2003-402,456; HONORABLE BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following his plea of not guilty, appellant Bruce D. Carrington was convicted by a

jury of aggravated robbery and punishment was assessed at 30 years confinement. Based

upon the rationale expressed herein, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 
2

Appellant was sentenced in open court on November 10, 2003, and no motion for

new trial was filed. Thus, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was December 10,

2003. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). The 15-day window extended the deadline to file the

notice and motion for extension of time to December 25, 2003 (extended to December 29,

2003, due to Christmas holidays).

On December 23, 2003, appellant timely filed in this Court a motion for extension

of time in which to file the notice of appeal; however, the notice of appeal was not actually

filed with the Lubbock County District Clerk until January 6, 2004, well outside the 15-day

extension period. By letter dated January 13, 2004, this Court requested that appellant

show cause within ten days why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond.

In a criminal case, when no motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal must

be filed within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). The

time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within 15 days after the deadline for

filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. 

A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke our jurisdiction if

the notice and a motion for extension of time are filed within 15 days of the deadline and

the motion is granted. See Pickens v. State, 105 S.W.3d 746, 748 (Tex.App.–Austin 2003,

no pet.), citing Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.3d 519, 522 (Tex.Cr.App. 1999). Rule 2 of the
3

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which authorizes this Court to suspend the operation

of a rule for good cause, does not permit the suspension of the time limit for perfecting an

appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.3d 208, 209-10 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998). Thus, we cannot

create jurisdiction where none exists. Id.

Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of

habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2004); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240

(Tex.Cr.App. 1999).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Our disposition of this

matter renders appellant’s motion for extension of time in which to file his notice of appeal

moot. 

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
News United States Air Force
 563rd RQG realigns to the 355th FWPublished Oct. 11, 2018
                        
                        By Airman Frankie D. Moore
                        
                        
                        355th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The 563rd Rescue Group, a geographically-separated unit out of Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, was realigned from the 23rd Wing to Davis-Monthan AFB’s 355th Fighter Wing Oct. 1, 2018.
The realignment brought all rescue squadrons and maintenance units that fall under the 563rd RQG, to include other geographically-separated assets located at Nellis AFB, Nevada, under the supervision of the 355th FW.
“This realignment gives us unity of command over a team that we’ve been working with for years,” said Col. Mike Drowley, 355th FW commander. “This brings us closer to a ‘One base, One boss’ concept which better helps us take care of assets on the installation.”
Thanks to this consolidation, the Air Force now has two installations with mirroring and equal capabilities. Both bases are now home to HC-130, HH-60 Pave Hawk, pararescue squadrons that provide combat search and rescue support and A-10 Thunderbolt II fighter squadrons that provide close air support.
“This increase provides a strategic advantage for CSAR operations in the future.” said Col. Jason Pifer, 563rd Rescue Group commander.
Since its activation at Davis-Monthan AFB in 2003, the 563rd RQG has worked diligently with the 355th FW do, in part, to their closely related operations.
“The rescue community and the A-10 community have a very synergistic mission,” Drowley said. “Having them as part of our family now allows us to better care for them as an Airman team and provide them with whatever they need to get their job done more efficiently.”
As a result of their previous and ongoing working relationship, the 355th FW and 563rd RQG realignment will have very little affect on missions here.
“Because the 563rd has been a mission partner for so long, their incorporation will not have a tremendous impact on our day-to-day activities,” Drowley said. “This just helps give us better insight on how to help prioritize resources in order to provide a greater benefit to their operations.”
With this realignment, the 355th FW has increased its capabilities by integrating with a team that possesses a like mission set and can now provide greater support to troops downrange.
“Now that this transition is official, everyone is looking forward to moving out and executing future operations together,” Drowley said. “We’ve always had a close relationship with this group and this consolidation is going to take everything to the next level.”Davis-Monthan AFB 



563rd Rescue Group 



355th Fighter Wing 



563rd RQG 



355th FW 



realignment 



nellis afb 



HC-130 



HH-60 



Pave Hawk 



pararescue 



A-10 



Thunderbolt II 



Air Force 



AF 



Air Force Base
News United States Air Force
 Trials for wounded warriors to begin Feb. 24Published Feb. 17, 2017
                        
                        By Richard Salomon
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas  --**
                For months, about 100 Air Force wounded, ill and injured service members and veterans have honed their skills in their chosen sport, with many overcoming significant hardships, in preparation for the Air Force Trials Feb. 24 to March 2 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.
The Air Force Trials is an adaptive and rehabilitative sports event designed to promote the mental and physical well-being of participants. The trials’ events include wheelchair basketball, sitting volleyball, swimming, track and field, air pistol and rifle shooting, rowing, archery and cycling.
An additional 37 wounded warriors from the U.S. Army, U.S. Marines, Great Britain and Australia will also be among the mix of competitors at Nellis AFB. The Air Force athletes will be vying for a spot on the Air Force team that will compete at the 2017 Department of Defense Warrior Games in Chicago in June.
“It’s an honor to be part of this event and to work with these courageous men and women who everyday demonstrate resiliency and strength,” said Marsha Gonzales, Warrior Care Support Branch chief. “For many of the athletes, this competition is more about maximizing their abilities and striving for their personal best – not so much about winning or losing. Adaptive sports helps our wounded warriors get back into the game of life and physical activity.”
The Air Force Wounded Warrior Program is administered by the Air Force Personnel Center. Visitwww.woundedwarrior.af.milfor more information about the AFW2 and how to enroll.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go tomyPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one byfollowing these instructions.JB San Antonio-Randolph 



Air Force Wounded Warrior program 



nellis afb 



ACC 



AETC 



AFPC 



veterans 



Army 



Marines 



raf 



RAAF
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of GSV Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen D. Bard, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |       |  | /s/ Stephen D. Bard
| | ----- |  | -------------------
| | Name: |  | Stephen D. Bard    
| | Date: |  | March 13, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Anderson Energy Ltd. (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian H. Dau, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
   Date:
March 21, 2012
 /s/ Brian H. Dau
News United States Air Force
 AF leadership provides update on the Air Force Publication Reduction InitiativePublished Aug. 29, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                A year ago, Air Force leadership directed a 24-month review of every Air Force directive publication,and today they announced the elimination of more than 226 publications and almost 4,795 compliance items.
In the letter delivered to Airmen,Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson, Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright said they owed the force an update.
“We view this as a warfighting imperative, empowering commanders to use good judgement to accomplish the mission,” Air Force senior leaders said in the letter.
The publications in the initiative are organized into three categories—Air Force Policy Directives, Air Force Instructions and Air Force Manuals.
In addition to eliminating more than 226 publications, Air Force senior leaders updated 212 publications, with another 309 in formal coordination.
Functional communities supporting the review considered whether publications add value, set policy, describe best practices and delegate authority to the lowest practical level.
The initiative has been a priority for Air Force leadership as they continue to provide Airmen and their local leadership more flexibility to accomplish the mission in a way that makes sense.
“We trust you to make the right decisions for your Airmen,” they said. “That’s what we want commanders to know.”
To read the letter, click here.SecAF 



CSAF 



Senior Leaders 



CMSAF 



review 



update 



Air Force instructions 



compliance 



directive 



publication 



Air Force Policy Directives 



Air Force Manuals 



SAF
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the period
covered by this report, of MS Structured Asset Corp. on behalf of SATURNS Trust
No. 2002-5;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                           By:      /s/ John Kehoe
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Name:    John Kehoe
                                           Title:   Vice President
                                           Date:    March 30, 2004
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Richard G. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa L. Griffith, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Spencer  |  |  |  | /s/ Lisa L. Griffith   
|Richard G. Spencer      |  |  |  | Lisa L. Griffith       
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-80175) of drkoop.com, Inc. of our report dated
February 15, 2000 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Austin, Texas
March 30, 2000
News United States Air Force
 Falcons undergo faceliftPublished Nov. 13, 2018
                        
                        By Senior Airman Christopher Maldonado
                        
                        
                        20th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. (AFNS) --**
                Upon entering a room lined with panels and LED lights, described solely as something out of a science fiction movie, people in polar white suits are ready to re-skin a new beast. 
The Airmen working across two shifts in the work center, paint and renovate the aircraft and equipment assigned to the Air Force’s largest combat F-16 Fighting Falcon wing. 
The work being performed on the aircraft is intended to provide a protective finish that prevents damage to the structure and enhance the aircraft’s overall lifespan. 
“Our mission here is to remove defective aircraft coatings,” said Tech. Sgt. Ryan Tinsley, 20th Equipment Maintenance Squadron corrosion control noncommissioned officer in charge. “We also inspect for corrosion and reapply coats should the aircraft need it.”
Tinsley went on to say the flight helps identify and troubleshoot paint fatigue that may be caused by consistent flights.
Within the facility, a locker room houses the protective gear of the Airmen assigned to the 20th EMS aircraft structural maintenance flight. 
“When we paint, no matter what we are working on that day, we keep safety in mind at all times,” said Tech. Sgt. Joseph Harris, 20th EMS corrosion control shift lead. 
Each job requires the Airmen to gear up from top to bottom to prevent any damage or poisoning that could be caused by the exposure to paint fumes. 
During the painting process, corrosion control Airmen inspect the aircraft for any cracks or wear that may have been caused through various aerial missions. 
“Our Airmen are the ones out there doing the hard work,” said Tinsley. “They are either sanding or painting anything that may come into the paint barn ... they’re the real work horses, they’re killing it.” 
With the continued support of these technicians the mission of the 20th Fighter Wing can thrive and allow the pilots to accomplish the suppression of enemy air defenses mission anytime, anywhere.f-16 



Air Force 



AF 



Shaw Air Force Base 



20th FW 



20th EMS 



F-16CM Fighting Falcon 



20th Equipment Maintenance Squadron 



20th Fighter Wing
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3576

_____________________________
T AYLOR A MARI M C L EOD , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. William E. Davis , Judge

. May 30, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ETHERELL , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
No. 87-6447.

#### Thacker *v.*Bumgarner, Superintendent, North Carolina Southern Correctional Center.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Atlantic City Railroad Company, respondent, *v.*R. Francis Wood, appellant.

[Argued December 1st and 2d, 1910.

Decided March 6th, 1911.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Reed.

*Mr. Gilbert Collins,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Robert H.*McCarter, for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed.

*For affirmance*— Ti-ie Chiei?-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vroom, CONGDON — 10.

*For reversal*— Parker, Vredenburgh — 2.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50837 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus $69,530.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant, DANIEL IFY IWEGBU, Claimant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-97-CV-4

-------------------- December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Daniel Ify Iwegbu, federal prisoner #22600-077, appeals from the forfeiture of $69,530 to the Government in a civil forfeiture action. Iwegbu lists as issues whether the Government’s forfeiture complaint was time-barred; whether the complaint was barred by laches; whether the violation of the Vienna Convention resulted in violations of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments; and whether the district court abused its discretionNo. 98-50837 -2- by failing to suppress his alleged confession. Iwegbu provides no legal arguments to support the contentions he lists for appeal; he effectively has abandoned his issues for appeal. Justiss Oil Co. v. Kerr-McGee Ref. Corp. , 75 F.3d 1057, 1067 (5th Cir. 1996). Because Iwegbu has abandoned his issues by failing to brief them, his appeal is dismissed as frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                            3,339 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                      0    
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,339 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,339 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,355,211 
<BONDS>                         557,134 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                   (5,739,681)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,339 
<SALES>                            0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   0    
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                135,996 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               30,800 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (133,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (133,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (133,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (128.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (128.00)

        

</TABLE>