alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shore *v.*Shore.

Under the code, a married woman may sue for a limited divorce, without the intervention of a next friend.

April, 1850.

The material facts appear in the judgment pronounced.

Campbell, J.

The complaint was in the name of the wife, against the husband, asking for a limited divorce. An order was made allowing alimony. A motion is now made to vacate that order, and to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that the wife cannot sue without a next friend. Section 114 of the code *716provides that when a married woman is a party, her husband must be joined with her, except, 1. that she may sue alone when the action concerns her separate property; and *2.*she may sue or be sued alone, when the action is between herself and her husband.

It would seem as if the mere reading of the last subdivision of this section was 'all that was requisite. She may sue or be sued alone. If the word “ alone ” has any meaning, it cannot refer to her husband. We cannot construe it, when the action is between herself and her husband, that she may sue or be sued without her husband. The law only means that she may sue or be sued without the intervention of any other party. Under the former law, the wife might sue in her own name alone, where she sued for an absolute divorce. It was held, however, that where she sued for a separation from bed and board, she could do so only by her next friend. The language of the statute Was however different in respect to the two proceedings.

It is unnecessary here to refer to the provisions of the revised statutes on the subject, but it may be remarked that in the leading case of *Wood*v. *Wood,*8 Wen. 357, it was held, by Chief Justice Savage and a very considerable minority of the court for the correction of errors, that even under those provisions, the wife could sue for a separation without a next friend. If under the code, a wife cannot sue for a separation without a next friend, neither can she, it would seem, sue alone for an absolute divorce. Her right to sue for one or the other, is now given together in the same section, and without any distinction. She may sue or be sued alone when the action is between herself and her husband. She may sue him, or he may sue her, for a divorce absolute, without any intervening party. No one doubts this, and yet the same language is applied to all cases between husband and wife. I cannot see how the distinction can be taken, and I must hold that where the action is for a limited divorce, the wife may sue in her own name alone. The motion ‘ must be denied without costs. My associates, Judges Duer and Mason, to whom this opinion has been submitted, concur with me.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-219]



[[Page 1384]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 5, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. United Community Bancorp, Inc., Chatham, Illinois; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Marine Bank & Trust, Carthage, 
Illinois, and Brown County State Bank, Mount Sterling, Illinois. 
Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
January 26, 2010.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. First National Management Group, LLC, Greenwood Village, 
Colorado; to become a bank holding company by acquiring at least 93 
percent of the voting shares of Amoret Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of BC National Banks, both in Butler, 
Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-219 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### ANTONIS C. ANTONIOU v. SARAH MARTINEZ.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20130 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus AUBREY LEON BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-556-ALL

-------------------- October 25, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Aubrey Leon Bailey appeals from his conviction of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that the factual basis tendered was insufficient to support his conviction on the federal firearms charge because the interstate commerce nexus required by 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) was not established. “This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” United States v. De
Leon , 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 863 (1999). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter H. van Oppen, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                                                      
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 10, 2004 |  | /s/ PETER H. VAN OPPEN                               
|                          |  | Peter H. van Oppen, Chair and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE-MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                840,905
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         364,178
<ALLOWANCES>                          5,000
<INVENTORY>                           325,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,633,222
<PP&E>                                6,089,259
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,917,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        4,265,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   523,842
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              5,739
<OTHER-SE>                            1,497,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          4,265,224
<SALES>                                 570,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        751,364
<CGS>                                   384,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           496,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        298,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (35,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (35,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (35,921)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.006)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: W.A.C., A MINOR 

PETITION OF: S.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 72 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: W.A.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 73 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.M.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.M.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 75 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.C.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 76 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.C.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 77 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[72 EAL 2023, 73 EAL 2023, 74 EAL 2023, 75 EAL 2023, 76 EAL 2023 and 77 EAL 

2023] - 2

AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Barrier Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anne M. VanLent, Executive Vice president, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. ANNE M. VANLENTAnne M. VanLentExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer(Principal financial officer)March
25, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

               [LETTERHEAD OF WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI]



                               October 10, 2000



Microtune, Inc.
2201 10th Street
Plano, TX 75074

        Re: Registration Statement on Form S-8

Gentlemen:

        We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed by
you with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about October 10, 2000
(the "Registration Statement") in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of an aggregate of 13,962,210 shares of your
Common Stock (the "Shares") under your 1996 Stock Plan (as amended), 2000
Director Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Stock Plan and
options to purchase Series E Preferred Stock (collectively, the "Option
Programs"). As your counsel in connection with this transaction, we have
examined the proceedings taken and are familiar with the proceedings proposed to
be taken by you in connection with the issuance and sale of the Shares pursuant
to the Option Programs.

        It is our opinion that, when issued and sold in the manner described in
the Option Programs and pursuant to the agreements which accompany each grant
under the Option Programs, the Shares will be legally and validly issued,
fully-paid and non-assessable.

        We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the
Registration Statement and any amendments thereto.

                                Very truly yours,

                                WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
                                Professional Corporation

                                /s/ Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
#### BROOKS v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.

No. 6244.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 4, 1941.

Lloyd L. Hendrick, of Shreveport, and Carl N. Davie, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Blanchard, Goldstein, Walker & O’Quin, of Shreveport, for appellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

Presumably the appeal perfected in this cause, which is an action sounding in tort, has been abandoned; for appellant has made no appearance whatever in this court in its behalf. Under circumstances of this nature, the proper decree is one dismissing the appeal. Bridges v. Gantt, La.App., 187 So. 829, Calhoun v. Hodges, La.App., 174 So. 209, and cases therein cited.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed at appellant’s costs.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JAMES T. ROBERTS, III, ) DOC #H39350 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4305 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William Sites, Judge. Henry G. Gyden, Esq., of Gyden Law Group, Tampa, for Appellant. James T. Roberts, III, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Blain A. Goff, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
News United States Air Force
 Female Airmen gain time to make separation decision when pregnantPublished April 27, 2017
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                Female Airmen now have up to 12 months after having a baby to request separation from the service under the Air Force’s new Diversity and Inclusion initiative.
This policy change, effective April 26, 2017, gives female Airmen more time to better understand and assess how they can balance a military career and family needs, ensuring they have the opportunity to contribute to mission success.
“To succeed in meeting current and future mission requirements, the Air Force relies on access to the best talent our nation has to offer,” said Daniel Sitterly, the acting Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. “To compete for that talent in the future, we must place consistent emphasis on diversity and inclusion in order to attract and retain talent.”
The previous policy only gave pregnant Airmen the option to leave the service before childbirth if they made the choice to separate. 
The change in policy allows female Airmen to apply for separation within the 12-month period after delivery via the virtual Military Personnel Flight, with the date of separation set for no more than 12 months after the date of application. This policy is not retroactive. However, female Airmen who delivered a child on or after April 26, 2016, are also eligible to apply for separation up to 12 months after childbirth under this provision. This policy does not apply to adoptive parents. 
Pregnant Airmen can still separate before the baby is born by submitting an application with a requested separation date between 30-90 days prior to their projected delivery date. 
In addition, new parents may find other Airmen who have successfully balanced work and family demands via the MyVector online mentoring system in order to provide further support and guidance.
“Our country has a natural advantage in our incredibly diverse population – we just need to maximize it,” Sitterly said. “This is another initiative which allows Airmen flexibility in making decisions for their careers, their families and their futures.”
Stay informed on the most current separation information on the Separation page on **myPers**. Click the Separation link on the far left from the active duty, Reserve or Guard landing pages or select “Any” from the dropdown menu and search “Separation.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to **myPers**. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by **following these instructions**.pregnancy 



separation 



AFPC 



SAF 



diversity 



inclusion 



Diversity and Inclusion Initiative 



military personnel flight 



MyVector
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 4, 2010, Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IILisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IICodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk
II(non-dosage forms) (9273)Morphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIRaw Opium (9600)
IIOpium extracts (9610)
IIOpium, powdered (9639)
IIOpium, granulated (9640)
IIPoppy Straw (9650)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IIConcentrate of Poppy Straw (9670)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than November 1, 2010. Dated: August 2, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-21772 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
      2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 12, 2003                   PETER H. VAN OPPEN
                                         --------------------------------------
                                            Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman
                                            and Chief Executive Officer