alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 30 , 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 00164

- CV

BILLY LLOYD MILLER AND MELODY MILLER , Appellant s
V.

ESTATE OF DON FLESHE R SR., TIMOTHY JAMES BUBEL , AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR FOR ESTATE OF DON FLESHER, SR., DON FLESHER, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A FLESHER FUNERA L HOME, CLAY FLESHER , INDIVIDUALLY, KRISTE N BOYD , AS HEIR OF CLAY FLESHER , AND FLESHER FUNERAL HO ME, INC. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 090918



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Murphy

, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Murphy

The parties have filed a j oint m otion to d ismiss this appeal in which appellants inform the

Court they no longer wish to pursue their action against appellees. Accordingly, w e grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal as requested by the parties. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a) (2)(A).

120164F.P05 /Mary Murphy/ MARY MURPHY JUSTICE2 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BILLY LLOYD MILLER AND MELODY MILLER, Appellants

No. 05

- 12

- 00164

- CV V.

ESTATE OF DON FLESHER SR., TIMOTHY JAMES BUBEL, AS
INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR FOR ESTATE OF DON FLESHER, SR., DON FLESHER, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A FLESHER FUNERAL HOME, CLAY FLESHER, INDIVIDUALLY, KRISTEN BOYD, AS HEIR OF CLAY FLESHER, AND FLESHER FUNERAL HOME, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 090918. Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy. Justices FitzGerald and Lewis participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. Pursuant to the parties’ request, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered this 30th day of April, 2013.

/Mary Murphy/ MARY MURPHY JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  Encompass  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 14, 2006          ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE J. HANDLER
                                 --------------------------
                                 Leslie J. Handler, President and
                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6267

GARRY DARNELL SAUNDERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL, Sheriff,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District

Judge. (CA-04-175)

Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: July 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Garry Darnell Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Garry Darnell Saunders, a Virginia inmate, seeks to

appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition and his subsequent motion to reconsider. We conclude

Saunders’ notice of appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal in a

civil case must be filed within thirty days of the entry of the

judgment being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The district

court, upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause, may

extend the time period for filing a notice of appeal an additional

thirty days. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The appeal periods

established by Rule 4 are mandatory and jurisdictional. Browder v.

Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978); United States v.

Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 1991). 

The district court denied Saunders’ § 2254 petition by

order entered on July 7, 2004. His subsequent motion for

reconsideration was denied by order entered on September 30, 2004.

He did not file a notice of appeal until February 2005, over four

months later, and never sought an extension of time in the district

court. Thus, Saunders’ notice of appeal is clearly untimely.

Accordingly, we deny Saunders’ motion for appointment of counsel

and dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -

DISMISSED
News United States Air Force
 B-1Bs conduct flyover during Seoul ADEX 17Published Oct. 23, 2017
                        
                        
                        Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii (AFNS) --**
                Two U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers conducted a flyover during the 2017 Seoul International Aerospace and Defense Exhibition, also known as Seoul ADEX 17, at Seoul Airport, South Korea, Oct. 21, 2017.
The B-1B flyover is part of the U.S. presence at Seoul ADEX 17, the largest, most comprehensive event of its kind in Northeast Asia. Approximately 200 U.S. personnel and a cross-section of U.S. military aircraft are represented at the event.
“The U.S. is honored to participate in this year’s Seoul ADEX,” said Gen. Terrence J. O’Shaughnessy, Pacific Air Forces commander. “Our steadfast relationship with (South) Korea, deeply rooted in our common principles and shared values, stems from working together every day across the full spectrum of operations and will continue to prosper as we further integrate our efforts through positive events such as this.”
Supporting Seoul ADEX 17 provides the U.S. with an opportunity to deepen ties with its South Korean partners and enhance regional security through expanded military-to-military cooperation. 
The two Lancers took off from Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, and flew north where they integrated with two Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-2 Mitsubishi’s south of Korea before conducting the flyover with two South Korean Air Force F-15K Eagles and then continuing west.
The sequenced flights with Japan and South Korea are a demonstration of the strength of the bilateral alliances between U.S. partners and allies.
The bombers were operating as part of the U.S. Pacific Command’s continuous bomber presence missions, which have been routinely employed since March 2004 and are in accordance with international law.JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam 



Pacific Air Forces 



PACAF 



2017 Seoul International Aerospace and Defense Exhibition 



Seoul ADEX 17 



South Korea 



B-1B 



Lancer 



Andersen AFB 



Japan Air Self-Defense Force 



F-2 



Mitsubishi 



F-15K 



eagle 



South Korean Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



Air Force Base 



joint base
News United States Air Force
 Crushing ISIS: Air power operations in a complex battle spacePublished Sept. 19, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Megan Friedl
                        
                        
                        Defense Media Activity
                **NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Lt. Gen. Jeffrey L. Harrigian, commander of U.S. Air Forces Central Command, discussed the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria during the 2017 Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference, Sept. 18, 2017. Since assuming command in July 2016, Harrigian has directed operations to defeat ISIS, to include the liberation of Mosul and the ongoing fight to liberate Raqqa and the remaining ISIS held territory within Iraq and Syria. “Crushing ISIS,” he said. “Let there be no doubt in anybody’s mind that’s what we are doing and that’s what this is about.” According to Harrigian, part of the AFCENT mission is distributing, with precision, 150 to 175 weapons a day with support from a targeting teams across the U.S. “We got to have action that moves us forward, solves our problems and ultimately, at the end of the day, it’s about winning,” said Harrigian. “That’s what our Airmen provide for us.” He detailed the operational complexities of the environment that coalition forces deal with on the ground every day. Harrigian emphasized a leader’s role in every mission is to provide guidance and intent, then Airmen execute the mission on the tactical side. “It gets back to empowering our team. When I talk about empowering, there’s a trust factor,” he said. “You’re going to make a decision and I’ll back you up.” For the last 20 years Airmen resorted to using a seven foot wide whiteboard to monitor airspace. As technology progressed, Airmen on the ground developed the Tanker Planning Tool. “[This tool] allowed them to focus on good quality mission planning,” Lt. Col Enrique Oti, Defense Innovation Unit Experimental director said. “It allowed for changes in the plan...they could run through multiple different options and try different scenarios.” Harrigian imparted how his team is providing air superiority, and failure to achieve that mission endangers the joint force while increasing the cost of achieving victory against ISIS . “At the end of the day, this is all about providing security and stability for those that have to live in this part of the world,” Harrigian said. “I’m privileged to be a part of this team. It’s been an experience, personally for me unlike anything I’ve ever had a chance to be a part of, and I’m just a small part of a great team that’s winning.”AFA 



2017 national events 



air 



space 



cyber 



Air Force Association 



AFCENT 



ISIS 



Air Force 



Expeditionary Operations
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,769
<SECURITIES>                                        49
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                       478
<INVENTORY>                                     37,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,011
<PP&E>                                           7,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,290
<BONDS>                                          6,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,758
<SALES>                                        103,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,189
<CGS>                                           68,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,720
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,597
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2428 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2428

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the Department of 
  Veterans Affairs provides temporary care in the most cost effective 
manner when patients are relocated during medical facility construction 
            and renovation projects, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2014

   Mr. Leahy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the Department of 
  Veterans Affairs provides temporary care in the most cost effective 
manner when patients are relocated during medical facility construction 
            and renovation projects, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Cost of Veterans 
Care Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVED ACCOUNTING OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY CONSTRUCTION 
              PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8104(b) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following 
        new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Additional costs of providing hospital care 
                or medical services resulting from temporary 
                displacement of clinical space required by such 
                construction, alteration, lease, or acquisition.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) In the case of a project that results in temporary 
        displacement of clinical space, an analysis of any additional 
        costs of providing hospital care or medical services resulting 
        from such displacement, including additional costs associated 
        with--
                    ``(A) contracting with a non-Department facility in 
                order to furnish hospital care or medical services;
                    ``(B) beneficiary travel; and
                    ``(C) the lease or purchase of a temporary or 
                mobile medical facility.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to requests for funding of major medical facility 
projects and major medical facility leases submitted to Congress 
pursuant to section 8104(b) of such title on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 15.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


AU Optronics Corp.





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.333-188283) on Form F-3 of AU Optronics Corp. of our reports dated March 17, 2015 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of AU Optronics Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, which reports appear in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 20-F of AU Optronics Corp.











/s/ KPMG


Hsinchu, Taiwan (the Republic of China)





March 24, 2015
exh103.htm


 










Exhibit 10.3


 


 



AMENDMENT TO THE


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


    This Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 20th day of May 2014, by and between Home Bank (the “Bank”) and Darren E. Guidry (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


    WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2011 (the “Agreement”); and


 


    WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


    NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 



    1.   The last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on June 22, 2016, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”




 



          2.   Except to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in


     full force and effect.




 


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.




 




	 	  	
HOME BANK

	  
	 	 	 	 
	 	  	  	  
	 	By:	/s/John W. Bordelon	  
	 	
 

	
John W. Bordelon

	  
	 	  	
President and Chief Executive Officer

	  
	 	  	  	  
	 	 	 	 
	 	  	  	  
	 	  	
EXECUTIVE

	  
	 	 	 	 
	 	  	  	  
	 	  	/s/Darren E. Guidry	  
	 	  	
Darren E. Guidry
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# 5W-/S"
COA # 05-13-00546-CR OFFENSE: 22.02 EdgarAlberto Romo v. The State 

### STYLE: 0fTexas COUNTY: Collin COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 199th Judicial District Court DATE: 04/17/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 199-82866-2012



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### EdgarAlberto Romo v. The Stateof 

### STYLE: Texas 

# APPELL^NT^S Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# ~Rcf/^</9&l) 

# DATE: /pj/l/wEJUDGE: 

### U±. CCA #: 

# 5*i-/r CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.11(a)

Amendment to Statement of Policy Regarding Executive Severance Pay Bonus Program

     On November 14, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the
following amendment to the Statement of Policy Regarding Executive Severance Pay
Bonus Program to increase from $75,000 to $125,000 the maximum Amount of
Severance Bonus Pay in section 7 of the Statement of Policy Regarding Executive
Severance Pay Bonus Program by removing the phrase "lesser of (i) $75,000" from
section 7 of the Program and substituting the phrase "lesser of (i) $125,000".
Exhibit 99.2



PARTHUSCEVA, INC.



Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of
ParthusCeva, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Elaine Coughlan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | By: |  | /s/    ELAINE
COUGHLAN                                               
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    April 30, 2003 |  |     |  | Elaine Coughlan Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ParthusCeva, Inc. and will be retained by ParthusCeva, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### JERRY MILLS, JR., and wife, TERRIE SUTHERLAND MILLS v. JOSEPH WAYNE THOMAS and ANDREA WEST THOMAS

No. 345PA00

(Filed 6 April 2001)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of an unpublished, unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 138 N.C. App. 553, 536 S.E.2d 366 (2000), reversing and remanding an order for summary judgment entered 16 October 1998, *nunc pro tunc*16 September 1998, by Morgan (Melzer A., Jr.), in Superior Court, Randolph County, and a judgment entered 6 January 1999 by Balog, J., in Superior Court, Randolph County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2001.

*Dees, Giles, Tedder, Tate & Gaylord, L.L.P., by T.M. Gaylord, Jr., and Jeffrey T. Workman, for plaintiff-appellants.*

*Stephen E. Lawing for defendant-appellees.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
News United States Air Force
 TRICARE changes to Nexium coveragePublished May 5, 2017
                        
                        By DHA Communications
                **FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Starting June 28, the drug Nexium will no longer be a TRICARE preferred, or formulary, drug. This means it will no longer be available in military pharmacies, and you will pay more if you get it through TRICARE Pharmacy Home Delivery or a retail network pharmacy. 
Nexium is a brand name prescription drug often prescribed to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease. To prepare for the change, patients can switch to one of three preferred drugs for the treatment of GERD.
•	Omeprazole
•	Pantoprazole
•	Rabeprazole
Your doctor may determine that the preferred drugs are not right for you and Nexium is medically necessary. In that case, TRICARE will cover the cost of Nexium. The normal copays for brand name formulary drugs through home delivery and retail network pharmacies will apply.
To get medical necessity, your doctor must submit a prior authorization request to Express Scripts that includes a reason why Nexium is deemed medically necessary for you. If you already have a prior authorization for Nexium, your doctor must submit an additional medical necessity determination, or you will have to pay the non-formulary copay.
What is GERD and how is it treated?GERD is a chronic digestive condition, which occurs when stomach acid flows back into the esophagus. This acid irritates the lining of the esophagus, which over time can lead to GERD.
Many people can make lifestyle changes and take over-the-counter drugs to manage their GERD symptoms. Sometimes, people need prescription drugs to reduce their symptoms.
The National Institutes of Health has more information about GERD and drug choices to treat it. For more information regarding brand and generic drugs, and which drugs are on TRICARE’s formulary, please visit the TRICARE website.military 



home delivery 



AF 



National Institutes of Health 



Nexium 



prescription drug 



pharmacies 



gastroesophageal reflux disease 



GERD 



normal copays 



TRICARE