alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004
of Cinemark, Inc. (the Issuer). I, Lee Roy Mitchell, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to the best of my
knowledge:  (i)
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. Dated: March 29, 2005 /s/Lee Roy MitchellLee Roy MitchellChief Executive Officer Subscribed and sworn to
before me this 29th day of March 2005. /s/ Carol WaldmanName:
    Carol WaldmanTitle:
    Notary Public My commission expires: 06/07/08 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      956
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,922
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### AUSTIN v. CONTINENTAL GEN. TIRE

No. 73A01

Case below: 141 N.C. App. 397

Motion by plaintiff to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 April 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 5 April 2001.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

131487 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MURRAY AVIATION, INC., TRAVELERS Stephen J. Markman, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, and Justices TRAVELERS LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 131487 COA: 257298 Wayne CC: 02-231493-NI GRINNELL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2528 

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshals Service to assist 

other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the investigation of cases involving missing children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2014 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshals Service to assist other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the investigation of cases involving 

missing children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Inves5 tigations of Missing Children Act of 2014’’. 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2528 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED 

2 STATES MARSHALS SERVICE. 

3 Section 566(e)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

6 the end; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

8 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C), the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(D) assist State, local, and other Federal 

12 law enforcement agencies, upon the request of 

13 such an agency, in locating and recovering 

14 missing children.’’. 

Æ 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40346 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DENNIS RAY STARNES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CR-10-2

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dennis Ray Starnes appeals his sentence after pleading

guilty to possession with intent to distribute marijuana. 

Starnes argues that the district court erred in failing to grant

a downward departure on the basis of his cooperation with the

Government. Starnes acknowledges this court’s holding in United

States v. Solis, 169 F.3d 224, 227 (5th Cir. 1999) that a

district court has no authority to depart for substantial

assistance under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 if the Government does not file
No. 02-40346

-2-

a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion. He attempts to distinguish his case

by arguing that the Government had bargained away its discretion

not to file a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion. He contends that the

Government reneged on its assurances to him that a U.S.S.G.

§ 5K1.1 motion would be filed.

The Government retained its discretion to decide whether to

file a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion in the plea agreement. Starnes

does not allege that Tonda Curry’s communications to Starnes’

lawyer that the committee had approved the filing of the U.S.S.G.

§ 5K1.1 motion occurred during plea negotiations or were an

inducement to his plea. The Government in this case clearly and

unequivocally retained complete discretion to file or not to file

a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion in the plea agreement. The Government

exercised its discretion not to file the motion, and the district

court had no power to grant Starnes’ motion.

Starnes argues that the district court erred in adding three

points to his offense level for his role in the offense. All

that was required to be shown in order for Starnes to be a

manager or supervisor was that he managed or supervised one or

more other participants. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment. (n.2). 

Starnes provided travel money, transportation, and instructions

to John Charles Baggett, a courier participating in the

conspiracy. Starnes managed or supervised Baggett, directing

where and to whom Baggett should deliver the marijuana on three

separate occasions. The district court did not clearly err in
No. 02-40346

-3-

finding that Starnes played a managerial or supervisory role. 

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b); United States v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929,

944 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                          671,208
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                         200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,000
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  16,044
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,044
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    1,600,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          1,600,052
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                     9,758,935
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       15,216,264
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       15,216,264
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                     (32,336)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (10,584,951)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (471,208)
<NET-ASSETS>                               (1,282,008)
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                                    0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  51,309
<EXPENSES-NET>                                  83,645
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       (32,336)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                             0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                         (32,336)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    300,000
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                        (32,336)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                   (10,552,615)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    (471,208)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 678
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 83,645
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       (1,265,690)
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            (.08)
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                      0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              (.08)
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                  (.06)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CEDRIC MCRAE.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Richard G. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa L. Griffith, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Spencer  |  |  |  | /s/ Lisa L. Griffith   
|Richard G. Spencer      |  |  |  | Lisa L. Griffith       
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2009
News United States Air Force
 JBLE Command and Control establishes AMC C2Published Oct. 19, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Carlin Leslie
                        
                        
                        633rd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY- EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Normally, while serving as Joint Base Langley-Eustis command and control specialists, Airmen in the JBLE Command Post focus on the varied missions of JBLE and its tenant wings. However, on Sept. 28, 2017, one critical mission called on these Airmen to support a global response mission. 
Overnight the JBLE Command Post became a command and control focal point for Puerto Rico hurricane relief efforts, coordinating with Air Mobility Command, U.S Transportation Command and the Tanker Airlift Control Center, becoming a fully operational air mobility asset.
“I am proud of our young Airmen for stepping up to the plate (and) having the drive, knowing they are directly impacting a global humanitarian relief effort and saving human beings’ lives,” said Kevin Castro, 633rd Air Base Wing Command Post chief.
The command and control team is supporting and coordinating efforts for the Global Response Medical Force from Langley Air Force Base, and Fort Eustis’ 597th Rapid Port Opening Element and 119th Inland Cargo Transfer Company. So far, they’ve supported a total of 23 missions, which included more than 500 tons of cargo and more than 123 personnel.
“With the significance of this mission and knowing we could support it, our Airmen very quickly trained and became the command and control focal point in support of the hurricane relief operations, changing gears and becoming AMC controllers seamlessly,” said Master Sgt. Jennifer Riter, 633rd ABW Command Post command and control noncommissioned officer in charge. “In that first shift, after notification, myself and another Airman had to create continuity consisting of checklists for each shift, contact lists for all the airfield agencies, daily flying schedules, and quick reference guides (while) creating everything in the mindset of an Air Mobility Command controller.”
According to Master Sgt. Stephanie Schwartz, 633rd ABW Command Post superintendent, the checklists were valuable to making the mission a success.
“The next morning after Master Sgt. Riter and Airman Stephen Grana created all the continuity, we were able to step in with no problems at 50 percent manning,” said Schwartz. “Imagine what our team could accomplish if we were fully manned, being the command and control node for JBLE, making sure that we are here for every unit in the local area and help out at any time through the process of rapid deployments.”
The 633rd ABW Command Post is always up to the challenge, ensuring JBLE’s joint mission partners are always prepared to support any contingencies that may come their way.Humanitarian 



Air Mobility Command 



relief 



hurricane 



633rd Air Base Wing 



Joint Base Langley Eustis 



global response 



AMC C2 



Global Response Medical Force 



JBLE
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: March 9Published March 9, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson talks about improving the quality of life for Air Force families, and the Air Force has announced the creation of a new information operations technical training school. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **Air Force officials announce creation of Info Ops tech school**SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



families 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



Information Operations 



Heather Wilson 



Tech School 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



ATAF
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FERNANDO MORALES.

November 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7712

DARRICK M. ALEXANDER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-00728-HEH)

Submitted: March 23, 2021 Decided: March 29, 2021

Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrick M. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darrick M. Alexander seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his action, which the court docketed as one under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, for failure 

to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Alexander v. Virginia, No. 3:20-cv00728-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AVTAR HEERA, AKA Avtar Singh Heera,

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-70545

A 077-819-102

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review from the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 8, 2021**

Portland, Oregon

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,*** District 

Judge.

Avtar Heera petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order of an immigration judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the 

District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

(“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief 

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and deny the petition. 

1. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Heera lacked 

credibility. See Bassene v. Holder, 737 F.3d 530, 536 (9th Cir. 2013). The IJ 

identified “specific, cogent reasons” for the adverse credibility finding that go to 

the heart of Heera’s claims for relief, including inconsistencies concerning Heera’s 

membership in a political party and his persecution at the hands of Indian police.

See Jie Cui v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1332, 1336 (9th Cir. 2013). Heera points to no 

evidence that would compel us to conclude he was credible. See I.N.S. v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992).

2. The adverse credibility determination provides sufficient support for 

denying Heera’s claims for asylum and withholding of removal. See Jie Cui, 712 

F.3d at 1338 & n.3; Mukulumbutu v. Barr, 977 F.3d 924, 927 (9th Cir. 2020). And 

although an “adverse credibility determination is not necessarily a death knell to 

CAT protection,” when Heera’s CAT claim is stripped of his incredible testimony, 

“all that remains is the background material he provided concerning conditions” in 

India, which do not compel us to conclude he was eligible for CAT relief. See 

Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1048–49 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Feb. 3Published Feb. 3, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** - On this look around the Air Force, three B-2 Spirit bombers return to Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, after a deployment, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, has begun construction of a next generation 9-1-1 call center, U. S. Air Force in Europe and Air Forces Africa has a new command chief, and February is American Heart Month. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler.
For previous episodes, click **here**.ATAF 



B-2 



Whiteman AFB 



Tinker AFB 



USAFE-AFAFRICA 



American Heart Month 



heart disease
S. 1896

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 11 Central 

Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Officer Jeremy Todd Charron 

Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. OFFICER JEREMY TODD CHARRON POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Officer Jeremy Todd 

Charron Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Officer Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.