alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Monroe Capital Corporation (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore L. Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Aaron D. Peck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 4, 2016 /s/ Theodore L. KoenigTheodore L. KoenigChairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Monroe Capital Corporation /s/ Aaron D. PeckAaron D. PeckChief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Monroe Capital Corporation
News United States Air Force
 JB Charleston C-17s arrive at Scott AFB following hurricane evacuationPublished Sept. 13, 2018
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Jonathan Lovelady
                        
                        
                        Joint Base Charleston
                **SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill (AFNS) --**Aircraft 



Air Force 



C-17 



Globemaster III 



Air Mobility Command 



natural disaster 



Scott AFB 



AF 



environmental 



evacuation 



JB Charleston 



Air Force Base 



joint base 



437th AMXS 



437th Aircraft maintenance Squadron 



ACM 



hurricane florence
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5546]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United States submitting sundry 
nominations which were referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
#### CARLOTTA D’ONOFRIO v. STEPHEN G. D’ONOFRIO.

November 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: September 13, 2006
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F/A of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger Deck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 10, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Roger Deck         
|                    |  |  |  | Roger Deck             
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31157

Summary Calendar

CRAIG SAMOUR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOUISIANA CASINO CRUISES, INC.; GREG S BROWN; JOSEPH JAMISON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(96-CV-3154)

September 30, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have examined the record in this case and are not

persuaded that the district court has committed reversible error. 

We AFFIRM.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 6 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00651

- CR

ANTONIO MENDOZA , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 04

- CR

- 1155

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of
a child. The trial court placed him on deferred adjudication community supervision for ten (10) years. Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant had violated certain conditions of his community supervision. Following a hearing, the trial court found five of the allegations true. T he trial court adjudicated appellant gui lty of the offense and o n June 15, 2012, sentenced appellant to confinement for five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas2

Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
One of the allegations the trial court found true w as that appellant failed to perform his court

- ordered community service. In his third issue, a ppellant claims

t hat it was an abuse of the trial court ’ s discretion to revoke his community supervision on this ground because “the trial court failed to consid er his substantial past efforts to fulfill his obligation and the fact that there was no evidence of his willful refusal to perform community service.” However, a ppellant concedes he did not satisfy this requirement of his community supervision. 1

A sing le violation of a probation condition is sufficient to support the trial

court ’ s decision to revoke probation

. Moore v. State, 605 S.W.2d 924, 926 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). To revoke probation, the State need prove the violation by only a preponderance of t he evidence. Hacker v. State , 389 S.W.3d 860, 864

- 65 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) . The record contains evidence sufficient to create a reasonable belief appellant violated a condition of his community supervision. Rodriguez v.
State , 2 S.W.3d 744, 746 (Tex. A pp.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1999 , no pet. )

. Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Appellant ’ s third
issue is overruled.
We need not address appellant ’ s other contentions because one sufficient ground for revocation will support the trial court ’ s judgment. T he judgment of the
trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Busby. Do Not Publish

C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

1 Appellant makes no argument it was impossible for him to perform the court

ordered community service

.
News United States Air Force
 Airmen support Q-West airfield alongside IraqisPublished Aug. 6, 2018
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Caleb Pierce
                        
                        
                        386th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **QAYYARAH AIRFIELD WEST, Iraq (AFNS) --**
                The average day for air traffic controllers involves a lot of moving parts and Airmen working constantly to ensure safe and secure air flow. For Qayyarah Airfield West, Iraq, this rests solely on the shoulders of just a few people.
Not only do those Airmen control the airspace, at the airfield commonly called ‘Q-West’, they also work side-by side with the Iraqi Air Force controllers.
Senior Airman Brennan Gettinger, a 447th Air Expeditionary Group air traffic controller, supports the critical airfield for strategic airlift along with the IqAF.
“Friendship is key,” said Gettinger, who is deployed from the 319th Operations Support Squadron at Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota. “Our mission is to train and advise the [Iraqis] because they don’t get the training most people do back in the States.”
The U.S. air traffic controllers interact and build relationships with their counterparts by assisting with Iraqi aircraft movement from the IqAF facility located at a separate area.
Senior Master Sgt. Adam Schill, 447th AEG Detachment 1 superintendent, said the mission is different here than that of home station locations as Q-West has a landing zone versus a runway. He added, working directly with Iraqi controllers adds a unique and beneficial element to their mission because the relationship with the IqAF controllers is key, not only to the growth of the Iraqis, but also the Airmen doing the training.
“It’s a very rewarding experience for the [Airmen] because they really get to reap the reward of building a good relationship with the Iraqi Air Force and see the fruits of their labor come to play when the Iraqis are controlling [their] aircraft,” said Schill. “They are very proud of what they do and we are very proud of them too.”
Schill went on to explain how the success of past rotations helped train the Iraqis to the point where they are directing different types of aircraft onto the airfield, and control it now with little to no assistance from U.S. forces.
Along with the air advisor role, Schill sais his team performed extremely well during this deployment.
“Knowing those of us here are supporting the whole airfield is simply amazing,” said Schill. “To watch everyone come together while simultaneously training the Iraqis – it’s amazing. I have never worked with a better group then this.”Qayyarah Airfield West 



Iraq 



air traffic controller 



Airmen 



Q-West 



airspace 



Iraqi air force 



447th Air Expeditionary Group 



447th AEG 



319th Operations Support Squadron 



319th OSS 



Grand Forks AFB 



Detachment 1 



landing zone 



runway 



deployment 



Air Force 



AF 



Air Force Base
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1307
<SECURITIES>                                        44
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4110
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5645
<PP&E>                                           12325
<DEPRECIATION>                                     738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   17232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6594
<BONDS>                                           1317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1760
<PREFERRED>                                        305
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                        7255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     17232
<SALES>                                           4302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4494
<CGS>                                             3648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (785)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)
        

</TABLE>
FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


DIGIPATH, INC.


2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This First Amendment (this “Amendment”)
to the DigiPath, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of May 30, 2014.


		1.	Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



 


“3. Shares Subject to the Plan.


(a) Aggregate Limits. Subject to the provisions
of Section 10 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan
is Thirty Million (30,000,000) Shares (the “Fungible Pool Limit”). The Shares subject to the Plan may
be either Shares reacquired by the Company, including Shares purchased in the open market, or authorized but unissued Shares. Any
Shares subject to an Award which for any reason expires or terminates unexercised or is not earned in full shall be added back
to the Fungible Pool Limit and may again be made subject to an Award under the Plan. The following Shares shall not be added back
to the Fungible Pool Limit and shall not again be made available for issuance as Awards under the Plan: (i) Shares not issued or
delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding Stock Appreciation Right, (ii) Shares used to pay the exercise price
or withholding taxes related to an outstanding Award, or (iii) Shares repurchased on the open market with the exercise price proceeds
received by the Company upon the exercise of an Award.”


 


		2.	Except as expressly set forth above, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain unchanged
by this Amendment and the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.



 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DigiPath, Inc.
has caused the undersigned to execute this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


DigiPath, Inc.


 


 


__/s/ Todd Denkin___________________


Todd Denkin


President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          900
<SECURITIES>                                 808417
<RECEIVABLES>                                140143
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                  196774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1154794
<PP&E>                                      1507114
<DEPRECIATION>                              1463993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1486513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        145312
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                       3350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1486513
<SALES>                                      154080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             157861
<CGS>                                        172435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                263606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (105745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (105410)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.03)


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of CAE Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2008, of our report dated May 13, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-97185) of CAE Inc. of our report dated May 13, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in CAE Inc.s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended March 31, 2008.

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l. and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent
legal entity.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Barry M. Edelstein, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted);  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         /s/ Barry M. Edelstein   Barry M. Edelstein   President and Chief Executive  Officer   Dated:August 10, 2007
#### THOMAS ZEIDELL v. NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. JOHN DELANEY AND VINCENT TORO v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force’s F-35A Lightning II arrives for first Middle East deploymentPublished April 15, 2019
                        
                        By Maj. Holly Brauer
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs
                **AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force’s fifth generation multi-role aircraft arrived for its first deployment to the Middle East on April 15. The F-35A Lightning IIs are from active duty 388th and reserve 419th Fighter Wings at Hill Air Force Base, Utah.
As the first deployment to the U.S. Air Forces Central Command area of responsibility, crews are prepared and trained for the AFCENT mission. The F-35A, the conventional takeoff and landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, provides greater operational capability by combining advanced stealth capabilities with the latest weapons technology.
“We are adding a cutting edge weapons system to our arsenal that significantly enhances the capability of the coalition,” said Lt. Gen. Joseph T. Guastella, U.S. Air Forces Central Command commander. “The sensor fusion and survivability this aircraft provides to the joint force will enhance security and stability across the theater and deter aggressors.”
The F-35A is designed with the entire battlespace in mind, and is intended to fuse, integrate and share data with other battlefield assets. It has one of the most powerful and comprehensive integrated sensor packages. It improves lethality, survivability and adaptability against emerging threats in order to maintain air superiority.
“The F-35A provides our nation air dominance in any threat,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein. “When it comes to having a ‘quarterback’ for the coalition joint force, the inter-operable F-35A is clearly the aircraft for the leadership role,” he stated.
The F-35A previously deployed to RAF Lakenheath in April 2017, as well as the U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility in the fall of 2017.
“We look forward to demonstrating the full range of the F-35A’s capabilities while it increases the interoperability of our forces throughout the region,” Guastella said.LR 



Al Dhafra Air Base 



UAE 



fifthgen 



F-35A 



388th Fighter Wing 



429th Fighter Wing 



Hill Air Force Base 



Joint Strike Fighter 



centcom 



Chief of Staff of the Air Force David L. Goldfein 



coalition joint force 



interoperability
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY TWINE.

June 25, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.