alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Barry R. Elson certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bally Total Fitness HoldingCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 9, 2006 /s/ Barry R. Elson Barry R. Elson    Acting Chief Executive Officer
EX10.4 Amendment to Suellyn P. Tornay Transition and Separation Agreement






Exhibit 10.4


AMENDMENT TO TRANSITION AND SEPARATION AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Suellyn P. Tornay and Global Payments Inc. are parties to a Transition and Separation Agreement dated December 12, 2013 (the “Agreement”); and 


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend certain of the terms of the Agreement;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto acknowledge that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


1. Section 2(v) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“(v)  For a period of twenty-four (24) months immediately following the Termination Date, the Company shall continue Employee’s Company-provided basic life insurance at least equal to that which would have been provided had Employee remained employed with Company in accordance with the Company’s group plans and the Company shall pay all premiums for such coverage for Employee, provided, however, that the obligation of the Company to provide the coverage referenced in this section (v) shall terminate upon Employee’s obtaining other employment to the extent that such life insurance coverage is provided by the new employer; and”


2.    A new Section 2(xii) shall be added to the Agreement as follows: 


“(xii)   In lieu of providing Employee with disability benefits or long-term disability insurance or other similar benefits, Company shall make a lump sum payment to Employee in the amount of $44,000, less normal withholdings, which amount shall be paid to Employee within 30 days of the Six-Month Pay Date.”


Except as modified hereby, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; provided, however, that if any term or condition of the Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent with any term or condition of this Amendment, such terms and conditions hereof shall prevail and be controlling.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers duly authorized as of the 31st day of July, 2014.




	
			
	GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.
	 
	SUELLYN P. TORNAY

	 
	 
	 

	By: /s/ David L. Green 
	 
	/s/ Suellyn P. Tornay

	Name: David L. Green 
	 
	Suellyn P. Tornay

	Title: EVP and General Counsel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service 

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of members to the Financial Management Service (FMS) Performance Review Board (PRB). 

# DATES:

This notice is effective on September 7, 2010. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wanda J. Rogers, Deputy Commissioner, Financial Management Service, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC; telephone (202) 874-7000. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice is given of the appointment of individuals to serve as members of the FMS PRB. This Board reviews the performance appraisals of career senior executives below the Assistant Commissioner level and makes recommendations regarding ratings, bonuses, and other personnel actions. Four voting members constitute a quorum. The names and titles of the FMS PRB members are as follows: 

## Primary Members 

Wanda J. Rogers, Deputy Commissioner. 

Kristine S. Conrath, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance. 

Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services. 

Linda S. Kimberling, Assistant Commissioner, Management (Chief Financial Officer). 

Alfred J. Kopec, Assistant Commissioner, Business Architecture. 

Sheryl R. Morrow, Assistant Commissioner, Payment Management. 

David Rebich, Assistant Commissioner, Govermentwide Accounting. 

Charles R. Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources. 

Dated: August 30, 2010. 

Wanda J. Rogers, 

Deputy Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 2010-21995 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
July 10, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHRISTOPHER JAMES STARKS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00848-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00848-CR

Christopher James Starks, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appealed from the 174th District Court of 

Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1294911). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

McCally. Justices Frost and Busby also 

participating.

TO THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on July 10, 2012, the cause upon appeal to revise or 

reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these 

words:

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Adele Hedges, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of 

Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, .

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000769503
<NAME>                          Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II - 6, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         6009
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15744
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22233
<PP&E>                                         3539001
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3473209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 88025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28160
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     59865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   88025
<SALES>                                        40694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40694
<CGS>                                          7002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### PRB ENTERPRISES, INC. AND CAPE MAY GREENE, INC. v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF CAPE MAY.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.7



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

The Board of Directors of Pure Resources, Inc.

     We consent to the use of our decommissioning estimates incorporated herein
by reference and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
Proxy Statement/Prospectus.


Twachtman Snyder & Byrd, Inc.

/s/ Robert C. Byrd

Robert C. Byrd
Vice President

Houston, Texas
April 17, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2595 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2595

  To revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic 
Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail into Vermont to 
   connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2014

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
Sanders, Mr. Franken, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Ms. Baldwin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic 
Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail into Vermont to 
   connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Country National Scenic Trail 
Route Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. ROUTE ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``thirty two hundred miles, extending from 
        eastern New York State'' and inserting ``4,600 miles, extending 
        from the Appalachian Trail in Vermont''; and
            (2) by striking ``Proposed North Country Trail'' and all 
        that follows through ``June 1975.'' and inserting ```North 
        Country National Scenic Trail, Authorized Route' dated February 
        2014, and numbered 649/116870.''.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects locations for B-21 aircraftPublished May 2, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force announced that the B-21 Raider will replace B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit aircraft at three existing bomber bases beginning in the mid-2020s.The Air Force selected Dyess Air Force Base, Texas; Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota; and Whiteman AFB, Missouri, as reasonable alternatives to host the new B-21 aircraft. Using the current bomber bases will minimize operational impact, reduce overhead, maximize re-use of facilities, and minimize cost, Air Force officials said."Our current bomber bases are best suited for the B-21," said Secretary of the Air Force Heather A. Wilson. "We expect the first B-21 Raider aircraft to be delivered in the mid-2020s."Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, and Minot AFB, North Dakota, will continue to host the B-52, which is expected to continue conducting operations through 2050."We are designing the B-21 Raider to replace our aging bombers as a long-range, highly-survivable aircraft capable of carrying mixed conventional and nuclear payloads, to strike any target worldwide," said Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein.The Air Force will make its final B-21 basing decision following compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and other regulatory and planning processes. That decision is expected in 2019.Although the first B-21 are expected in the mid-2020s, the Air Force doesn't plan to retire the existing bombers until there are sufficient B-21s to replace them. The Air Force hasn't determined which location will receive the aircraft first.B-21 



Raider 



B-1 



B-2 



Lancer 



spirit 



Dyess AFB 



Ellsworth AFB 



Whiteman AFB 



Barksdale AFB 



Minot AFB 



B-52 



Stratofortress 



SecAF 



SAF
NOTE: 

### This order is nonprecedential. 

# mlntteb**~tate~ ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI~** 

# fortbe jf

# eberaI(!Circuit

ALEXSAM, INC., Plaintiff-CrossAppellant,


### v. IDT CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.
2012-1063, -1064 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District ofTexas in case no. 07-CV-0420, Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham.


### ON MOTION

Before LINN, 

### Circuit Judge. 

### ORDER Alexsam Inc. moves for leave to file a surreply briefto address arguments raised by IDT Corporation ("IDT") for the first time in its reply brief and to strike certain arguments related to demonstrative aids and reexamination materials from IDT's reply brief and fromALEXSAM v. IDT CORP 2 the joint appendix. IDT consents to a surreply limited to the issue ofjudicial estoppel and moves for leave to file a surreply ofits own. Alexam replies. Concerning the motion to strike, IDT states that it requested in its briefthat the court take judicial notice of reexamination materials. The court treats Alexsam's motion to strike as a response to the request for judicial notice and defers that matterto the merits panel. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) Alexsam's motion to file a surreply is granted. Alexsam may file a surreply brieflimited to the issue of judicial estoppel and not to exceed 7 pages. Alexsam's surreply is due within 14 days ofthe date ofthis order. (2) The motion to strike is deferred for consideration by the merits panel. Copies of the document shall be transmitted to the merits panel. (3) IDT's motion to file a surreply is denied.
FOR THE COURT 

## JAN 03 2013 Date

cc: Timothy P. Maloney, Esq. Glen 

### E. Summers, Esq. s25 lsIJan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

FILED 

## us.COURTOFAPPEALSFOR

• THE**FEDEf!~!** """!r,IJIT 

### JAN U32013 JANHORBALY 

### CLERK
#### COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOL. v. DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.

No. 78P01

Case below: 141 N.C. App. 569

Petition by plaintiffs/defendants (Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated and Reidsville Transaction Corporation, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 2001.
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF KOST FORER GABBAY & KASSIERER, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-101553 and 333-107443 pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, and 2003 Director Stock Option Plan of CEVA, Inc. (formerly ParthusCeva, Inc.) of our report
dated January 21, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of CEVA, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.



/S/ KOST FORER GABBAY &
KASSIERERKost Forer Gabbay & Kassierer (formerly Kost Forer & Gabbay)A Member of Ernst & Young Global




Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 9, 2004
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Nov. 8Published Nov. 8, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force enlisted pilots take their first solo flight and a World War II bomber pilot is awarded the Silver Star. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith. 
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- First two enlisted pilots complete solo flights
- WWII bomber pilot awarded Silver StarATAF 



enlisted pilot 



AETC 



RPA 



Silver Star 



WWII
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID SCHMIDT.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the annual report
of Rezolute, Inc. Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith Vendola, Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date:	December 31,
2018 |    
|----------------------- | ---
|                        |    
|                        | By:
|                        |    







A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Rezolute, Inc. and will be retained by Rezolute, Inc. Inc. to be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.