alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Massachusetts State 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that briefing and planning meetings of the 
Massachusetts State Advisory Committee will convene on September 23, 
2010, at 10 a.m. in the Council Room at City Hall, 536 Dwight Street, 
Holyoke, MA 01040. The purpose of the briefing meeting is for the 
Advisory Committee to continue its work on English Language Learners. 
The purpose of the planning meeting is to discuss future activities of 
the Committee.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 23, 2010. 
Written comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, 
Washington, DC 20425. They may be faxed to 202-376-7748, or e-mailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4124332e0134322222336f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2d7c0ddf2c7c1d1d1c09cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who desire additional information may contact 
the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meetings and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-22149 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Reg. Nos. 333-183170 and 333-173188) and Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-182203) of our reports dated February 27, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of C&JEnergy Services, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, and to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2012, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

/s/ UHYLLP 

Houston, Texas 

May 17,2013
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 CINEMARK, INC.
CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Year Ended December 31,Period
fromOctober 5, 2006to
December 31, 2006
    
Period fromJanuary 1, 2006toOctober 4, 2006


    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003
    
    2002Computation of Earnings:Registrants pretax income (loss)
from continuing operations before
adjustment for minority interests in
consolidated subsidiaries or income
or loss from equity investees
$
    (17,695
    )
    
$
41,354


    $
    37,277
    
    
    $
    44,522
    
    
    $
    75,699
    
    
    $
    69,848Add:Fixed charges
    
    56,378
    
    

101,491


    
    127,278
    
    
    
    111,063
    
    
    
    90,629
    
    
    
    92,738Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    117
    
    

354


    
    470
    
    
    
    460
    
    
    
    454
    
    
    
    433Distributed income (loss) of equity
investees
    
    154
    
    

(1,800
    )

    
    227
    
    
    
    173
    
    
    
    141
    
    
    
    250Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    

    (86
)
    
    
    (74
    )
    
    
    (407
    )
    
    
    (234
    )
    
    
    Minority interest in pretax income
(loss) of subs that have not
incurred fixed charges
    
    321
    
    

(1,790
    )

    
    (924
    )
    
    
    (4,353
    )
    
    
    (3,410
    )
    
    
    (599
    )Total earnings
    $
    39,275
    
    
$
139,523


    $
    164,254
    
    
    $
    151,458
    
    
    $
    163,279
    
    
    $
    162,670Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    $
    41,037
    
    
$
66,109


    $
    82,883
    
    
    $
    69,470
    
    
    $
    51,853
    
    
    $
    55,428Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    

86


    
    74
    
    
    
    407
    
    
    
    234
    
    
    
    Amortization of debt issue costs
    
    1,183
    
    

3,082


    
    3,984
    
    
    
    3,473
    
    
    
    2,310
    
    
    
    2,365Interest factor on rent expense
    
    14,158
    
    

32,214


    
    40,337
    
    
    
    37,713
    
    
    
    36,232
    
    
    
    34,945Total fixed charges
    $
    56,378
    
    
$
101,491


    $
    127,278
    
    
    $
    111,063
    
    
    $
    90,629
    
    
    $
    92,738Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
0.70
    
    

1.37


    
    1.29
    
    
    
    1.36
    
    
    
    1.80
    
    
    
    1.75
#### Droz *v.*Lakey and Pine.

A party obtaining a verdict, is not bound to wait four days before entering and perfecting his judgment.

The four days mentioned in the code, after which judgment becomes final, are intended to enable the losing party to obtain a stay of proceedings, in reference to a case.

If he obtain an order staying proceedings within the four days, he may move to set aside the verdict as against evidence, notwithstanding the entry of the judgment,

Jan. 19, 1850.

Appeal from an order of a justice at chambers, denying a motion to set aside a judgment.

In two days after a verdict for the defendants, they proceeded to enter and perfect judgment. The plaintiff desiring to move to set aside the verdict as against evidence, obtained an order to stay proceedings on the second day, but after the entry of judgment, and subsequently prepared a case.

Insisting that judgment could not be perfected until the expiration of four days from the entry of the verdict, and of the direction of the court for judgment thereon, he moved to set aside the judgment as irregular. He contended that unless it were set aside, he could not make his motion for a new trial.

*B. F. Winslow,*for the appellant,

cited Amended Code, sections 264, 265, 269, 280,1281, 323; Graham’s Pr. 296, 336 to 338; 1 Wend. 31.

*W. E. Curtis,*for the defendants,

referred to section 220 of *682the original code, section 08-1 of the amended code, and 1 ©ode Reporter, 125;

By the Court.

Upon the rendition of a verdict, the justice who tries the cause directs an entry of the judgment to he rendered thereon, unless he desires to consider the matter further. And judgment shall be entered by the clerk, in conformity to the verdict, which shall be final after the expiration of four days, unless there be an order reserving the case or staying the' proceedings-. (Amended Code, § 264, 265.). The clerk is to make up the- judgment roll immediately after entering the judgment. (Ib. § 281.) This is restricted in effect by the two days-previous notice required for the adjustment of the costs.

We think the intent of section 265, was not to delay the entry ■of the judgment, or its completion in form, until after the expiration of four days; but that a judgment so entered and completed, will become absolute and final, unless before the end of four days, the losing party shall obtain from the court or a justice, a stay of proceedings. If he desire to move for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against evidence, he may obtain a stay for that purpose within the four days, and then move at special term on a case. If his motion be granted, the judgment never becomes final, and will be vacated of course. The defendants have been regular, and the plaintiff must be content with the order at chambers which preserves all his rights.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1





March 12, 2020


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re: Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.








By:/s/ SARAH NEWELLSarah NewellVice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KURT D. GIBBONS.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2594 

To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, as the 

‘‘William H. Gray 30th Street Station’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2014 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market 

Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known 

as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, as the ‘‘William H. Gray 30th 

Street Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The railroad station located at 2955 Market Street 

5 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (commonly known as ‘‘30th 

6 Street Station’’), shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘William H. Gray 30th Street Station’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2594 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the railroad 

4 station referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 

5 reference to the ‘‘William H. Gray 30th Street Station’’. 

6 SEC. 3. FUNDING RESTRICTION. 

7 No Federal funding may be used to modify signage 

8 at the railroad station referred to in section 1 or for re9 lated activities necessitated by the redesignation of such 

10 station. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 35th FW relocates for Vigilant Ace 18Published Dec. 6, 2017
                        
                        
                        35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **OSAN AIR BASE, South Korea (AFNS)  --**
                The 35th Fighter Wing relocated 18 F-16 Fighting Falcons and more than 280 personnel to participate in Vigilant Ace 18, an annual flying exercise at Osan Air Base, South Korea, occurring Dec. 4 - 8, 2017. 
The exercise tests the readiness of 35th FW Airmen to rapidly respond within the Indo-Asia-Pacific region and enhance interoperability with allies and sister services across the Korean Peninsula, while sustaining operations away from home station. 
“Overall, this exercise will help identify shortfalls our fighter squadron would endure if we had to relocate to [South Korea] during a real-world scenario,” said 1st Lt. Michael Mayclin, 13th Fighter Squadron F-16 pilot. “We want to safely execute our ‘Wild Weasel’ mission set during our time here, while further learning about our role within the Pacific.”
During the relocation, both pilots and maintainers focused on a seamless operational transition from Misawa AB to Osan AB.
“Our number one priority ensures bed-down procedures, or getting equipment and personnel in the right location, are completed and will sufficiently support the mission for immediate operational use,” said Capt. Gabriel Byrd, 13th Aircraft Maintenance Unit officer in charge. “It is important to find and correct errors during a simulated exercise versus a real-world wartime contingency.”
Alongside the 35th FW, Airmen with the 51st FW at Osan AB received realistic training in-processing Airmen from another unit. 
“There are very few differences between receiving forces and cargo during Vigilant Ace 18 and during a wartime environment,” said Staff Sgt. David Mayo, 51st Maintenance Group unit reception monitor. “If we are flying by the seat of our pants when a real-world scenario occurs, a lot of time and effort will be wasted, potentially costing lives. This exercise forces us to be flexible and accommodate the needs of incoming units.”
Vigilant Ace 18 encompasses more than 12,000 U.S. personnel at eight South Korea and U.S. military installations across the Korean Peninsula.Vigilant Ace 



Panthers 



Samurais 



Osan Air Base 



35th Fighter Wing 



f-16 



Fighting Falcon 



South Korea 



13th Fighter Squadron 



Misawa AB
##### 



Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
AFTER THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT OF CAPITAL
  TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION CERTIFY
 FIRST: TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
 RESOLVED
 TENTH:
 A.
    
    The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed under the
direction of a Board of Directors consisting of not less that nine (9), nor
more than nineteen (19) Directors.
 SECOND:
 THIRD:
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, d
 TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-ComasRamón M. Ruiz-ComasAuthorized Officer
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 04-1192 JANE ANN RUSSELL, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. JO ANNE BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Torruella and Lynch, Circuit Judges .
Raymond J. Kellyon brief for appellant. Thomas P. Colantuono , United State s A ttorney, David L. Broderick , Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Lisa G. Smoller , Assistant Regional Couns el, S ocial Security Administration, on brief for appellee.

October 7, 2004-2- Per Curiam . Claimant Jane Russell has appealed a district court judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services which deniedRussell's application for supplemental security income payments. We affirm.

Russell first claims that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") failed to properly assess he r credibility and lacked an adequate foundation for finding her subjective complaints of pain "not entirely credible." One of the reasons the ALJ partially dis countedRussell's testimony was because "she failed to foll o w prescribedtreatment on a regular basis." We have examined the record and find substantial evidence to support the ALJ's finding of "sporadic adherence to prescribed therapy." A cl aimant's failure to follow prescribed medical treatment contradicts subjective complaints of disabling conditions and supports an ALJ's decision to deny benefits. See Tsarelka v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 842 F.2d 529, 534 (1st Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (affirming denial of benefits where claimant did not follow through with securing medical treatment); Duma s v. Schweiker , 712 F.2d 1545, 1553 (2d Cir. 19 83) (a ffirming denial of benefits where claimant failed to heed doctor's diet recommenda tion which would have helped hypertension and headaches).

Russell next claims that the ALJ erred in determining that she had the residual functional capacity to perform light work. The ALJ's residual functional capacity determination has-3-

substa ntial support in the record. We have considered Russell's various arguments and find them without merit.

Finally, Russell claims that the ALJ erred in using the Medical-Vocational Guidelines to determine the range of work that she could perform because her migraine headaches cause nonexertional limitations that called for testimony froma vocational expert. There is substantial support for the ALJ's finding that Russell's migraines had no non -exertional impact on her residual functional capacity. Accordingly, the ALJ did not err in applying the Guidelines. Cf. Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 890 F.2d 520, 524 (1st Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (noting thatGuidelines are not applicable where claimant has significant nonexertional impairments).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed . See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VANESSA BRINSON.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40576 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JORGE A DUARTE, also known as El Hondureno Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-926-14
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge A. Duarte pleaded guilty and was convicted ofconspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana. The district court sentenced him to 70 months of imprisonment, four years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. Duarte argues that hewaswrongly denied a downward adjustment for his minor or minimal role in the offense. The advisory Sentencing Guidelines provide for a reduction in the base offense level of a “minor” or a “minimal” United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 16, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40576

2 participant. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. To merit a reduction under § 3B1.2, the defendant must have been “substanti ally less culpable” than the average participant. § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(A)). “The defendant bears the burden of establishing that he is eligible for the adjustment.” U nited Statesv. Partida, 385 F.3d 546, 566 (5th Cir. 2004). The presentence report indicates that Duartewas one ofmany lower-level participants in a drug trafficking organization. He participated for an extended period of time in activities such as conducting counter-surveillance to monitor law enforcement activity, driving loads of marijuana, and general loading and unloading of marijuana. Duarte has not shown that he is substantially less culpable than the average participant in the conspiracy, given that there were many lower-level participants such as himself. See § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(A)). H e hasalso not shown that his participation was “peripheral tothe advancement of the illicit activity” or that his participation was not “critical to the offense.” United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Tremelling, 43 F.3d 148, 153 (5th Cir. 1995). We find no reversible error in the district court’s denial of a reduction under § 3B1.2. AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 DoD celebrates Month of the Military ChildPublished April 21, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Nathan Byrnes
                        
                        
                        99th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS)  --**
                April is designated as the Month of the Military Child by the Department of Defense Education Activity. This awareness month was established to underscore the important role children play in the Armed Forces community.
Military children face unique challenges such as extended family separations, frequent moves and the stress of deployments.
The MOMC is a way to celebrate the unique aspects of being a military child that most other children outside the military may never have to face. Special events for MOMC have been taking place all month throughout the military to recognize these children. 
One of the ways the DODEA is recognizing military children this year is through “Purple Up! For Military Kids” day April 21, 2017. They are encouraging military families and local communities to wear purple in support of military children’s strength and sacrifices.
“MOMC is designed to highlight our kids and their unique experiences in life,” said Keana Sullivan, the Nellis Air Force Base Child Development Center director. “We do something every day, usually something fun. We have activities such as crazy hair day, sports day, trike-a-thon, our annual spaghetti dinner and we finish up the month with an ice cream social which is always a big hit.”
According to Sullivan, some people might look at what military children go through as negatives, but she prefers to look at all the positives that come along with it.
“There is a significant difference in their life experience in the world and we really just need to celebrate that,” said Sullivan. “It’s not a bad thing. It’s just different, but we are all different together and this month is just a celebration of that. It gives them something to be happy about and we try to celebrate the positives of being a military child. We are still unique and valued and there is something to be joyous about in their experiences as military children.”
While this month is meant to acknowledge the adjustments that each child is required to make, it also highlights the importance of the support systems in place for these children, especially when their parents are away.
“I’m honored that I’m able to be here and be an advocate to help out these families,” said Ciera Jones, a Nellis AFB Child Development Center pre-school teacher. “We go through a lot here. From deployments, temporary (assignments), permanent change of station...There is constantly something going on and it can be hard on the child. It just means a lot to me that I get to be a part of this journey of assuring families that their children will be taken care of no matter what.”resiliency 



deployments 



families 



children 



seperations 



MOMC 



Celebration 



journey 



Purple Up 



ACC