alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Breaking barriers: Miller nominated as AF Reserve's first 4-starPublished Aug. 21, 2018
                        
                        
                        Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command Public Affairs
                **ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS) --**
                Lt. Gen. Maryanne Miller was nominated by President Donald Trump and confirmed by the U.S. Senate for promotion to the rank of general Aug. 20. Miller will become the first Airman in the history of the Air Force Reserve to pin on a fourth star while actively serving. In 2016, she became the first female chief of the Air Force Reserve and commander of the Air Force Reserve Command.
She joined the Air Force in 1981, a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Ohio State University. She is a command pilot with more than 4,800 flying hours in numerous aircraft. Prior to her current assignment, she was the deputy to the chief of the Air Force Reserve in Washington, D.C., commanded two wings and held numerous staff positions at the unit, Air Staff and Joint Staff levels.
Miller will become the first reservist to lead Air Mobility Command, a total force mission supported by the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve.AFRC 



Air Force Reserve Command 



general 



4-star 



women 



nomination 



confirmation 



senate 



ROTC 



Robins AFB 



AMC 



Air Mobility Command Related Links
        Lt. Gen. Maryanne Miller
News United States Air Force
 Aircraft accident on Nevada Test and Training RangePublished April 4, 2018
                        
                        
                        Nellis Air Force Base Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                An Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon assigned to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, crashed at approximately 10:30 a.m. during routine training on the Nevada Test and Training Range.
The condition of the pilot is unknown at this time.
Emergency responders are on the scene. As soon as additional details become available, they will be provided. The accident is under investigation.f-16 



Air Force 



accident 



investigation 



Fighting Falcon 



pilot 



nellis afb 



Nevada Test and Training Range 



emergency responders 



Aircraft
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the use of our reports herein and to the reference of our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus/proxy statement with respect
to the financial statements of Coral Reserves Natural Gas Income Fund 1990
Limited Partnership, Coral Reserves Natural Gas Income Fund 1991 Limited
Partnership, Coral Reserves Natural Gas Income Fund 1992 Limited Partnership,
Coral Reserves Natural Gas Income Fund 1993 Limited Partnership, Coral Reserves
1993 Institutional Limited Partnership, Coral Reserves Income Fund 1995 Limited
Partnership, Coral Reserves Energy Income Fund 1996 Limited Partnership, Coral
Reserves 1996 Institutional Limited Partnership, Coral Reserves, Inc. and Coral
Reserves Energy Corporation.



                              William T. Zumwalt, CPA, Inc.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
August 11, 2000
#### The People, Ex rel. Rumsey, *v.*Woods and others.

Where after a default, the plaintiff amends his complaint, (not in mere matter of form,) he must serve the same on the defendant. A judgment entered thereon without such service, is irregular.

June, 1849.

Motion by Woods to set aside the judgment entered against him in this suit, as irregular. The plaintiff served a summons and complaint on three defendants. Woods suffered the matter to go by default. The other two defendants demurred to the *653complaint. Some months afterwards, the plaintiffs amended their complaint, in a substantial matter, and not in mere form. No copy was served on Woods, or notice given to him. Subsequently the plaintiffs proceeded to assess their damages against Woods and the others, and perfected judgment.

*J.*Cook, for Woods.

*C. C.*Egan, for the plaintiffs.

Sandford, J.,

after advising with Oakley, Ch. J., and Yanderpoel, J., said, the judgment is irregular and must be set aside. The practice contended for on behalf of the plaintiff, would be very unjust. It by no means follows, that because Woods did not defend the original complaint, that he was not desirous to answer to the complaint as amended. He should have been served with notice of the amendment so as to give him an opportunity to answer, if he were so advised.

Rule accordingly.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAMIAN ESPINOSA.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report") of Garrison Capital Inc. (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian Chase, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |   |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

 

 

|                         |        |
|-------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Brian Chase         |   |
| Brian Chase             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 6, 2018           |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORDON SCOTT BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 368 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Nov. 25Published Nov. 25, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Javon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, NASA launches a new weather satellite, Airmen train with Marines during Vigilant Ace 17-1, and Serbian support during World War II is commemorated. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith.
Related links:
- 45th SW supports successful Atlas V GOES-R launch
- Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni Ready Group takes part in Vigilant Ace 17-1
- US commemorates Serbian support during WWIIsatellite 



NASA 



WWII 



Atlas V 



Marines 



ATAF 



Featured Videos 



Serbia 



Vigilant Ace 17-1 



Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith 



Around the Air Force
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 48P01

Case below: 139 N.C. App. 636

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari denied 1 March 2001.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard A. Sackett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of REMEC, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |     |  |                       
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------
|Date: June 18, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard A. Sackett
|                    |  |     |  | Richard A. Sackett    
|                    |  |     |  | President
Opinion filed February 7 , 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _

_____ 

### No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 121

- CR

____ _ ______ 

### DANIEL OLIVARES EQUINIONES , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 385 th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

. CR48578

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Based upon an open plea of guilty, the trial court convicted Appellant, Daniel Olivares Equiniones
, of the offense of credit card or debit card abuse

. After finding the enhancement allegations to be true, t he trial court assessed Appellant’s punishment at confinement for tw o years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

. We affirm

. Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously2 examines the record and applicable law and conclude s that this appeal is frivolous
and without merit . Counsel has provided A ppellant wi th a copy of the brief
, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the c lerk’s record and the reporter’s
record . Counsel advised A ppellant of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to file a petition for discretionary review in order to seek review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 48.4 , 68

. Court

- appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
A ppellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief

. Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous and without merit

. 1
We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial

court

.

PER CURIAM February 7 , 201 9 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J. 2
Willson, J., not participating.

1 We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.

2 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Ea stland, sitting by assignment.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F.
R. Saunders, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operation of the Company.


/s/ F. R. Saunders, Jr.
-----------------------------------
F. R. Saunders, Jr.
President / Chief Executive Officer

                                      *****

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey A. Paolucci, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (3)  To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (4)  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey A. Paolucci
-----------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Paolucci
Chief Financial Officer

                                       50
#### RIX v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VCG Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W. Prosser, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: | March 31, 2006
|------ | --------------



/s/ Donald W. ProsserDonald W. ProsserChief Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00365

- CR

DARREL WAYNE WASHING TON A/K/A

DARRELL WAYNE WASHIN GTON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- 1691

- C1

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due on December 9, 2013. On

motion by the reporter, an extension to file the reporter’s record was granted. The

reporter has now requested a 60 day extension to file the reporter’s record.

The report er’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. The reporter is

granted a 30 day extension to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s request for a 60Washington v. State Page 2

day extension is denied without prejudice of requesting another extension if

circumstances requir e.

The reporter’s record due date is extended to June 20, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted in part and denied in part

Order issued and filed June 1 9 , 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,114
<PP&E>                                          21,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,730,997
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,216
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,361,318)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   384,895
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (95,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (96,430)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (96,430)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.11


KPMG logo


KPMG LLP
Telephone
(306) 934-6200Chartered Accountants
Fax
(306) 934-6233600-128 4th Avenue South
Internet
www.kpmg.caSaskatoon Saskatchewan S7K 1M8Canada


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 To the Shareholders and Board Directors of Claude Resources Inc.
 
 We have audited the accompanying consolidatedbalance sheets of Claude Resources Inc. as at December 31, 2010and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
 We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Claude Resources Inc. as of December 31, 2010and December 31, 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 in conformity with Canadiangenerally accepted accounting principles.
 
 Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidatedfinancial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in Exhibit 99.12 of Form 40-F entitled "Reconciliation to United States GAAP" is presented for purposes of additional analysis and requirements under securities legislation. Such supplementary information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
 
 We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Claude Resources Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 25, 2011expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Claude Resources Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
 KPMG sig
  Chartered Accountants
 
 Saskatoon, Canada
 March 25, 2011