alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 66 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5615]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   ORDERS FOR TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995

  Mr. KYL. Finally, Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when 
the Senate completes its business today it stand in recess until the 
hour of 9:30 a.m., on Tuesday, April 25, 1995; that following the 
prayer the Journal of proceedings be deemed approved to date, the time 
for the two leaders be reserved for their use later in the day, there 
then be a period for the transaction of routine morning business not to 
extend beyond the hour of 12 noon with Senators permitted to speak for 
up to 5 minutes each with the exception of the following: Senator 
Domenici, 60 minutes; Senator Thomas, 30 minutes; Senator Baucus, 15 
minutes.
  I further ask that at 12 noon, Tuesday, the Senate proceed to a vote 
on the adoption of Senate Resolution 110, regarding the bombing in 
Oklahoma City; further that the Senate recess between the hours of 
12:30 and 2:15 tomorrow for the weekly policy luncheons to meet.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
Order filed April 24, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00775-CR

____________

JOHN WOODS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1331540

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed October 12, 2012. Our review has determined 

that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain a certified bill of costs.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before May 22, 2014, containing a certified bill of costs.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4440]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          TIME LIMITATION ON REFERRED BILL PURSUANT TO RULE X

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1323. Referral to the Committee on Commerce continued 
     for a period ending not later than June 1, 1995.

                          ____________________
```
#### Warner *v.*Wigers.

Where there are issues of law and fact, and the cause is brought on for trial of the latter, the court will then determine whether it shall be tried before the issue of law is disposed of.

Ilf tried without objection, it will be deemed to have been first tried by the order of the court.

February 9, 1849.

There were issues of law and of fact in this case. Both parties noticed the cause for trial at the trial term, and it was tried on the issue of fact, without objection. It was now contended that this was irregular, and that the verdict should be set aside, because the issue of law was not first disposed of, pursuant to section 206 of the cede of procedure. (Laws of 1848.)

Vanderpoel, J.,

after advisement with his associates, held that both parties having concurred in bringing on the trial of the issue of fact, thus consenting to that course; it must be deemed to have been tried first by the order of the court, within the meaning of the code.

He said that it was the opinion of all the justices of the court, and such will be the practice in future, that whenever a cause was moved on the trial calendar, in which there was an issue of law pending, the court will then determine whether the issue of fact shall be first tried or not. And it is not necessary to obtain a previous order on the subject.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1804
MARY TUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-426-3-MU) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. C harles Evans Johnson, Brian Christian Lambert, KILPATRICK STOCKTON, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's civil suit arising under § 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act,29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. American Telephone & Telegraph, Co. , No. CA-95-426-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit3.1

** **

**CERTIFICATEOF FORMATION**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERICAN HONDARECEIVABLES LLC**

 

ThisCertificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC(the“**Company**”), dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordancewith the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.       Name.The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.       RegisteredOffice.   The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street,in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.       RegisteredAgent.   The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is The Corporation TrustCompany, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

** **

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16thday of March, 2011.

** **
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Michael T. Moe, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-K of GSV Capital Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this
report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.



Dated this 13th day of March
2012.



|By: |  | /s/Michael T. Moe                              | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- | 
|    |  | Michael T. Moe
        Chief Executive Officer |
**Exhibit32.1**

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

       Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Champions Biotechnology, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification isan exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.

Date: September 15, 2008

/s/ Douglas D. Burkett

  

Douglas D. Burkett

  

Principal Executive Officer
    
  

/s/ Durwood C. Settles

  

Durwood C. Settles

  

Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY IMPERIALE, JR.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 AF signs Automated Remediation, Asset Discovery memoPublished Feb. 24, 2017
                        
                        By Air Force Chief Information Security Officer
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force took definitive steps Feb. 24, 2017, to secure the full range of Air Force networked systems with the mandate of the Automated Remediation and Asset Discovery(ARAD) capability.
Designed to give real-time visibility into the lowest level of computing across any system which has the tool installed, ARAD is a game-changer, allowing Air Force cyberspace defenders the ability to immediately identify and respond to threats across all network reliant tools including weapons systems and Industrial Control Systems.cyber Related Links
        ARAD memo
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE LEE McGEE )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-249

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 29, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Brian Iten, Judge.

Willie Lee McGee, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and CRENSHAW and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Order entered November 16, 2012 / /

- ,/J In The 

## QCourt oftpptat jTiftj ttrfttofcxaat

# afta No. 05-12-01 284-CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.T, A CHILD ________

— On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-1 1-00657-Z 

### ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s November 13, 2012 unopposed verified motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brieE The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to file herbriefby December 14, 2012. I MOLLY JUSTICE CIS
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Lorraine M. Breece, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted);  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         /s/ Lorraine M. Breece   Lorraine M. Breece   Acting Chief Financial Officer   Dated:August 10, 2007
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5558]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   ORDERS FOR MONDAY, APRIL 24, 1995

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, when the Senate completes its business 
today, I ask unanimous consent that it stand in adjournment, and on 
Monday April 24, 1995, at 12 noon, following the prayer, the Journal of 
proceedings be deemed approved to date, no resolutions come over under 
the rule, the call of the calendar be waived, the morning hour be 
deemed to have expired, and the time for the two leaders be reserved 
for their use later in the day; that there then be a period of morning 
business until 1 p.m., with Senators permitted to speak for up to 5 
minutes each.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the amended Annual Report of Technologies Scan Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ghislaine St-Hilaire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






March 17, 2014
By:
/s/ Ghislaine St-HilaireGhislaine St-HilaireChief Executive Officer, President(Principal Executive Officer)
EX-33.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

The Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is responsible for assessing
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has
determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the
servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment for the Period, the Company has complied, in all
material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance for
the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari Gillund
    Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 23, 2012
---

EXHIBIT 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, C. Kevin McArthur, Chief Executive Officer of Tahoe
Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

By:/s/
      Kevin McArthurName:
    C. Kevin McArthurTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    March 12, 2015


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                       327
<INVENTORY>                                     15,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,667
<PP&E>                                           4,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,746
<SALES>                                         42,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,142
<CGS>                                           29,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,896
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 31, 2006 Before Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge Hon. Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge Hon. Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge No. 05-4744 WATERLOO F URNITURE C OMPONENTS , L TD ., Plaintiff-Appellant , v. H AWORTH , I NC ., Defendant-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 05 C 0507 Elaine E. Bucklo, Judge

. O R D E R The slip opinion of this court issued on October 30, 2006, is amended as follows: Page 1, caption, for Waterloo Furnitur e Components, Ltd., change “PlaintiffAppellee” to “Plaintiff-Appellant”. Page 1, caption, for Haworth, Inc., chan ge “Defendant-Appellant” to “DefendantAppellee”.