alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|Name of Subsidiary                                                   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Percentage &Type of Securities Owned or Controlled by Company
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Voting Securities Held                                               | Non-Voting Securities        
|Itetemia Mining Company Limited(1)                                   | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 90% (common)                                                 
|Lunguya Mining Company Ltd.(2)                                       | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 60% (common)                                                 
|Tancan Mining Company Limited                                        | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 100% (common)                                                
|Tanzania American International Development Corporation 2000 Limited | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 100% (common)                                                
|Buckreef Gold Company Limited(3)                                     | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 55% (common)                                                 
|Northwest Base Metals Company Limited(4)                             | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 75% (common)                                                 

(1)	The remaining 10% interest is held by
State Mining Corporation.

(2)	The remaining 40% interest is held by Northern
Mining and Consultancy Company Ltd.

(3)The remaining 45% interest is held by State
Mining Corporation.

| | (4) | The remaining interest is held 15% by State Mining Corporation and 10% by Beijing Songshanheli Mining Investment Co.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Juan J. Román, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Triple-S Management Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 11, 2008 By:  /s/ Juan J. Román   Juan J. Román
#### STATE v. OVERTON

No. 465P00

Case below: 138 N.C. App. 555

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 20 December 2000.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 8Published Aug. 8, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) -- On this look around the Air Force, Phase Two of Mobility Guardian begins, and Ellsworth Airmen provide Pacific bomber support. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **Mobility Guardian Phase 2 begins**
- **Ellsworth Airmen take on Pacific bomber mission as Dyess completes milestone deployment**
- **Airmen in developmental special duties epitomize leadership, core values**Ellsworth AFB 



Airmen 



PACAF 



Dyess AFB 



Around the Air Force 



Mobility Guardian 



Featured Videos 



DSD 



developmental special duty 



Bomber Presence 



Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins 



ATAF
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





In
connection with the Annual Report of New Media Lottery Services, Inc., (the
“Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350),
John T. Carson, the President, principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my
knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.





Date:
      August 13, 2009
              
              By:
              /s/ John T. CarsonJohn
      T. CarsonPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
                and
      Principal Financial Officer)





* This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of New Media Lottery Services, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### STATE v. ALLEN

No. 23P01

Case below: 141 N.C. App. 610

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 April 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CA-920-1310-FI; CACA 47609]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Leases

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease CACA 47609 from Mirada Petroleum Inc. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all required rentals and royalties accruing from August 1, 2009, the date of termination.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rita Altamira, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy and Minerals, BLM California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1623, Sacramento, California 95825, (916) 978-4378.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed the BLM for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The Lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate the lease effective August 1, 2009, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Brenda Kidder,

Land Law Examiner, Acting, Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals. 

[FR Doc. 2010-21898 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             211,730
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      572,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                        49,547
<INVENTORY>                                        381,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,232,299
<PP&E>                                             351,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                     208,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,496,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              580,360
<BONDS>                                            304,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               958
<OTHER-SE>                                         579,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,496,715
<SALES>                                          2,242,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,240,034
<CGS>                                            1,391,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,391,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   697,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    120,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45,376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 74,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        74,706
<EPS-BASIC>                                           1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.30


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 18.1

The Notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements of Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
included in its Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 describe a change
in the method of accounting related to the recognition of recoveries of unpaid
dues under inactive membership contracts from accrual-based estimations to a
cash basis of recognition. We conclude that such change in the method of
accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your business
judgment to make this change and for the stated reason, is preferable in your
circumstances. We have not conducted an audit in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards of any financial statements of the Company as of any
date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2002, and therefore we do not
express any opinion on any financial statements of Bally Total Fitness Holding
Corporation subsequent to that date.

| | Very truly yours,
| | -----------------

| | Ernst & Young LLP
| | -----------------
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 244 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 244

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project 
       offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project 
       offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PILOT PROJECT OFFICES OF FEDERAL PERMIT STREAMLINING PILOT 
              PROJECT.

    Section 365 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15924) is 
amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Pilot Project Offices.--The following Bureau of Land 
Management Offices shall serve as the Pilot Project offices:
            ``(1) Rawlins Field Office, Wyoming.
            ``(2) Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming.
            ``(3) Montana/Dakotas State Office, Montana.
            ``(4) Farmington Field Office, New Mexico.
            ``(5) Carlsbad Field Office, New Mexico.
            ``(6) Grand Junction/Glenwood Springs Field Office, 
        Colorado.
            ``(7) Vernal Field Office, Utah.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           986,249
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     83,041
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,107,944
<PP&E>                         7,736,364
<DEPRECIATION>                 2,531,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 6,414,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          4,832,997
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                     1,462,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   6,414,399
<SALES>                          290,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 309,469
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 345,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (36,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     (36,264)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (5.52)             
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (5.52)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on April 29, 2010, Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) (2010), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule I.

The company plans to manufacture Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) (2010) in bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) form for distribution to the company's customers.

                    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with                           ( print page 53720)                        DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).                

Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than November 1, 2010.

Dated: August 13, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-21745 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41457 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARIO BARAJAS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 236

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Barajas has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 63 2 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Barajas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant p arts of the record reflected therein , as well as Barajas ’ s response

. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41457 Document: 00514123982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2017No. 16

- 41457

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Barajas’ s motions to vacate his
sentence and remand the case to the district court, incorporated in his
response, are DENIED ; counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 4 2.2. Case: 16-41457 Document: 00514123982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2017
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




I,
      Jay O.
      Wright, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of MobilePro Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      (the
“Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MobilePro Corp.
      for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.


Dated:
              August
              9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Jay
              O.
              WrightJay
                O. Wright, Chief Executive Officer




I,
      Richard H. Deily, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MobilePro Corp. for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2007 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      MobilePro Corp. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.


Dated:
              August
              9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Richard
              H. DeilyRichard
                  H. Deily, Principal Financial and
                Accounting
                  Officer