alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                         176,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,980
<PP&E>                                       1,083,695
<DEPRECIATION>                               (579,505)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 790,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          303,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          560,752
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   790,222
<SALES>                                      1,597,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,624,609
<CGS>                                          389,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  885,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               298,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,597
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    STEPHEN J.
FANNING            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Stephen J. Fanning                   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

I, John F. Glenn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-K,
as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended,
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 13, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    JOHN F.
GLENN   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | John F. Glenn          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### THOMAS F. HENNESSY, JR. v. DONALD J. SHUTELLO.

June 13, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT II

Reliv' International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                                  EXHIBIT 11
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                -----------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months Ended March 31
                                       ------------------------------------
                                        1997                          1996
                                       (in thousands, except per share data)

<S>                                    <C>                          <C>
Primary:
 Average shares outstanding              9,621                       10,186
 Net effect of warrants and options        760                          133
                                       -------                      -------
Totals                                  10,381                       10,319
                                       =======                      =======
Net Income                             $   819                      $   278
                                       =======                      =======
Per share amount                       $  0.08                      $  0.03
                                       =======                      =======
Fully Diluted:
 Average shares outstanding              9,621                       10,186
 Net effect of warrants and options        780                          133
                                       -------                      -------
Totals                                  10,401                       10,319
                                       =======                      =======
Net Income                             $   819                      $   278
                                       =======                      =======
Per share amount                       $  0.08                      $  0.03
                                       =======                      =======
</TABLE>

Note: Per share data reflects the effect of the Company's 10 percent stock
dividend declared on January 31, 1997 and distributed on February 28, 1997.  The
1996 data reflects the pro forma effect of the dividend.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: May 4Published May 4, 2018
                        
                        By Senior Airman Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)**– On this look around the Air Force, a C-130 Hercules crash is being investigated, medical Airmen get real-world experience in Panama, and Air Mobility Command holds their biannual Phoenix Rally Summit. Hosted by Senior Airman Jasmine Vanderheyden.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- AMC, civic leaders discuss education initiatives at Phoenix Rally
- New Horizons Embedded Health Engagement provides unparalleled training
- C-130 crashes in Georgiamedical 



Air Mobility Command 



Air Force TV 



C-130 



AMC 



Georgia 



Panama 



Hercules 



Around the Air Force 



Senior Airman Jasmine Vanderheyden 



New Horizon 



ATAF
News United States Air Force
 Arctic Challenge exercise aims to increase interoperabilityPublished May 26, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Abby L. Finkel
                        
                        
                        DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **ROVANIEMI AIR BASE, Finland (AFNS) --**
                Twelve F-15C Eagles and about 200 personnel from the 493rd Fighter Squadron at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, and two KC-135 Stratotankers and over 30 personnel from the 351st Air Refueling Squadron at RAF Mildenhall, England, deployed to bases in Finland and Sweden for exercise Arctic Challenge 2017.**Multinational exercise**
Arctic Challenge, a multinational training exercise, began May 19, 2017, and runs until June 2.
The exercise aims at building relationships and increasing interoperability, and includes participants from the U.S., Finland, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada and the Netherlands, as well as representatives from NATO.**Increase interoperability**
"The primary objective for us is to work together with our partner nations and allies to increase our interoperability capabilities as a force," said Lt. Col. Jason Zumwalt, the 493rd FS commander.
Zumwalt added, "These practice opportunities and experiences allow our pilots and maintainers to work together side-by-side with our partners and allies to plan, execute and debrief some very complex missions. That allows us to see how we can better work together in the future."
Over the next two weeks, Arctic Challenge participants will conduct live-flying events to train on offensive and defensive air combat operations. They will practice evaluating aircraft, personnel and weapons capabilities, as well as mobilizing and training in multinational operations.**Working together**
"Being able to work closely, face to face, side by side, and coordinate our actions together to achieve a common goal provides excellent training for everyone involved,” Zumwalt said.
Through training exercises like Arctic Challenge, the U.S., allies and partner nations can build on their expertise in the air, creating a credible force prepared to effectively respond to any crisis together.USAFE 



exercise 



joint 



Arctic Challenge 



England 



KC-135 



RAF Mildenhall 



Stratotanker 



F-15 



eagle 



Sweden 



Finland 



RAF Lakenheath
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1051

In re: MICHAEL GRAYLEN WHEELER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:04-cr-00066-RLV-CH-1)

Submitted: May 31, 2018 Decided: June 21, 2018

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Graylen Wheeler, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Graylen Wheeler petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district 

court has not adjudicated his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion that he filed on June 

11, 2012. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The pro se 

motion requested a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750. However, the district 

court had already denied his counseled § 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 750, 

and we affirmed the district court’s order denying the motion. Moreover, Wheeler is no 

longer serving the prison sentence that was based on a Sentencing Guidelines range that 

was subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission. Instead, he is now serving a 

revocation sentence based on his violation of supervised release conditions. 

“[M]andamus has traditionally been used in the federal courts only to confine an 

inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise 

its authority when it is its duty to do so.” Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95 (1967) 

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and 

should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 

394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). The 

party seeking issuance of the writ bears the burden of showing that his right to the writ is 

clear and indisputable. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d at 517 (citations omitted). We conclude 

that Wheeler fails to make this showing. Accordingly, although we grant him leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense
3

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-114134, 333-139574 and 333-148141) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-124830 and 333-131517), of ourreports dated February 21, 2008, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Santarus,Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Santarus, Inc. includedin this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Diego, California
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1659

In re: TONY ERVIN LOPEZ, a/k/a Pullulo, a/k/a Peludo , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 1:07

- cr
- 00137

- TSE

- 1 )

Submitted : August 23, 2018 Decided: August 27, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tony Ervin Lopez , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tony Ervin Lopez p etitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this court directing the district court to order the Government to file a promised motion

. We conclude that Lopez is not entitled to mandamus relie f. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available

o nly when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &
Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Lopez is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
ad equately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,073,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,007,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                10,738,200
<INVENTORY>                                    320,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,261,200
<PP&E>                                     101,038,200
<DEPRECIATION>                              69,654,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             185,242,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,855,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               185,242,300
<SALES>                                     97,755,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            98,978,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,914,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,880,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,654,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,957,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,696,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,696,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HENRY LEE JONES.

March 18, 1985..

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Jon W. Gacek, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                       
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: September 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JON W. GACEK                                                                                                                      
|                         |  |  |  | Jon W. Gacek, Chief Financial Officer andExecutive Vice President, Finance and Operations (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a separate disclosure document.
---

VIA EDGAR

|To: | United States Securities and Exchange
|--- | -------------------------------------
|    | Commission                           
|    |                                      
|Re: | Tahoe Resources Inc. (the Company) 
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F           
|    | Consent of
      Expert              

This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the Annual
Report). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things,
the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the
Annual Information Form).

I, Paul Tietz, C.P.G. of Mine Development Associates, Reno,
Nevada, hereby consent to:

- the use of my name in connection with my involvement in the preparation of
  the technical report entitledEscobal Guatemala Project NI 43-101
  Preliminary Economic Assessmentand dated May 7, 2012
  (theTechnical Report);
- references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual
  Information Form; and
- the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived
  from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Dated the 7th day of March, 2013

/s/ Paul
TietzPaul Tietz, C.P.G.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   
  We hereby consent to (i) the inclusion in Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (ii) the incorporation by reference in Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726) of our Auditor’s Report dated March 6, 2012 relating to the Pretium Resources Inc.’s Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the period from the date of incorporation on October 22, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
  signed “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”
 Chartered Accountants
  March 12, 2012
tnib_ex105.htm


Exhibit 10.5


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 




  





13











  






 


 


14
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION





I, Brian Pflug, certify that:





1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Cinema Destinations, Corp.;





2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading, with respect to the periods covered by this report;





3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)[Omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-15(a).]





(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: September 24, 2012
/s/ Brian Pflug

Brian Pflug, Chief Financial Officer