alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1999
<CASH>                                      59,534,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,741,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                   914,271
<INVENTORY>                                 40,247,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           137,165,666
<PP&E>                                     106,000,687
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,985,890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             223,318,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,251,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       251,937
<OTHER-SE>                                 186,572,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               223,318,497
<SALES>                                     90,492,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,492,257
<CGS>                                       69,893,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               69,893,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,236,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,388,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,131,318)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,257,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,257,284)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          14,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,100
<INVENTORY>                                    836,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,261,500
<PP&E>                                       1,613,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 561,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,317,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,300
<BONDS>                                      1,498,900
<COMMON>                                       471,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     740,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,317,000
<SALES>                                      1,894,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,894,300
<CGS>                                        1,330,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,330,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    72,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan highlights budget, readinessPublished Jan. 19, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Rusty Frank
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The ability to adapt and stay ahead of potential adversaries is one of the greatest challenges the Air Force faces, Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan said during an Air Force Association breakfast in Washington, D.C., Jan. 18, 2018.
To help meet this challenge, the Air Force is focusing on a budget that will further the service down its path to improving readiness. The service has initiated a zero-base budget review program for the first time in more than two decades.
“The idea here is to get after the relevancy of what we’re doing,” said Donovan. “We’ll look at each and every program and requirement to see if it’s increasing our lethality for the future threat environment as we prepare for (fiscal year 2020) and the Future Years Defense Plan, and ensure we’re getting the best use of every taxpayer dollar.”
Fiscal 2018’s budget keeps with the previous year’s focus on readiness and capacity by keeping funding on track for the F-35 Lightning II, KC-46 Pegasus, B-21 Raider and other important programs. However, Donovan warned that a continuing resolution would have a negative effect on manpower and on these programs.
“The further along you go into the fiscal year, with the short term CR’s, the more likely a full term CR becomes and that’s not a good thing for us,” said Donovan. “It will have damaging impacts (with) readiness and modernization taking the biggest hits.”
Looking toward the future, Donovan highlighted the fiscal 2019 President’s Budget request – a strategy-driven budget that aligns with the direction of the new National Security Strategy and with the objectives of the new National Defense Strategy. For the Air Force, the fiscal 2019 request builds the size and mix of capabilities the service needs to compete, deter and win in the joint environment by focusing on people, readiness, modernization, nuclear deterrence and space.
Despite future budget uncertainties, the military and the Air Force is ready to support any military options that may be required and the Air Force will prevail.
“We are still the greatest air and space force on the planet,” said Donovan.Matthew Donovan 



budget 



readiness 



Air Force Association 



AFA 



breakfast 



Future Years Defense Plans 



fiscal year 



F-35 



Lightning II 



KC-46 



Pegasus 



B-21 



Raider 



programs 



contiuning resolution 



CR 



National Security Strategy 



National Defense Strategy 



Under Secretary of the Air Force 



Under Secretary of the Air Force Matthew P. Donovan
Abatement Order filed October 23 , 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00710

- CV

____________ NATHANIEL SHELTON AN D MARCIA SHELTON , Appellant s
V. ALFRED KALBOW, AS TR USTEE OF ALFRED MART IAL TRUST, ET

. AL

. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 335th District Court Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 35589



### ABATEMENT ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 29, 2014

. Appellee Alfred Kalbow, trustee of the Alfred Kalbow Marital Trust, filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. It appears from the record that the judgment may not be final. See McNally v. Guevara , 52 S.W.3d 195, 196 (Tex. 2001) (judgment that did not dispose of attorney’s fees was not an appealable judgment, and party’s omission of attorney’s fees in motion for summary judgment did not waive the claim).The Texas Supreme Court has advised that if an appellate court is uncertain

about the intent of an order to fin ally dispose of all claims and parties, it can abate the appeal to permit clarification by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides
as follows:
The appellate court may al low an appealed order that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record. Tex. R. App. P. 27.2. Accordingly, we order the case abated and rema nded to the trial court for a period of thirty days so that the trial court may clarify whether the partial summary judgment became final when the severance order was signed, and to permit the parties to obtain an order or orders disposing of attorneys’ fe es , if necessary. A supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the trial court ’ s clarifying order(s) shall be
filed with the c lerk of this court on or before December 1, 2014

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court ’ s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may
reins tate the appeal on its own motion.
It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CDEX Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy Shriver,
President and Chief Executive Officer (and Chief Accounting and Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 1, 2007            /s/ Timothy Shriver
                                   -------------------
                                   Timothy Shriver
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief
                                   Accounting and Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 ANG rescue teams save 19 civilians following Hurricane FlorencePublished Sept. 18, 2018
                        
                        By Capt. Matt Murphy
                        
                        
                        Air National Guard Public Affairs
                **SAMPSON COUNTY, N.C. (AFNS) --**
                Air National Guard Search and Rescue teams from Alaska and New York conducted operations Sept. 17, in North Carolina's Sampson and Clinton Counties, resulting in 19 lives saved.Staged in Ocean, Virginia, Alaska ANG Master Sgt. Cody Inman, pararescue team lead, 212th Rescue Squadron, said his team was notified of a mission around 12:30 p.m. from the North Carolina Emergency Operations Center."The [rescue] force launched in two HH-60 Pavehawks with a couple of C-130s to go rescue and recover isolated civilians," said Inman. "It was a cool thing to witness all the state Guard teams coming together to help those in need."Inman added the team worked with local firefighters and other federal authorities to coordinate the operations and deliver the rescued citizens to a nearby medical center.hurricane florence 



resuce 



Humanitarian 



search and rescue 



176th Wing 



211th Rescue Squadron 



Air National Guard 



ANG 



Alaska ANG 



NY ANG 



pararescue 



HH-60 



recovery Related Links
        Alaska Guardsmen Conduct Rescue Operations in North Carolina
                                
                                Alaska Air National Guardsmen from the 176th Wing conduct rescue operations near Sampson, N.C., Sept. 17, 2018. The Guardsmen conducted site surveys and performed aerial refueling with a 211th Rescue Squadron HC-130J Combat King II aircraft and transported 212th RQS personnel to assist with recovering isolated flood survivors via a California ANG’s 129th Wing HH-60 Pavehawk helicopter crewed by members of the 210th RQS. Guardsmen from the 176th Operations Support Squadron and 176th Maintenance Squadron conducted behind the scenes tasks at Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., making rescue operations possible. Run Time: 05:13.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROSEMARY HELFRICHT.

June 13, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                       202
<INVENTORY>                                      1,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,072
<PP&E>                                          33,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,366)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,242
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,772)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,533
<SALES>                                         44,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,479
<CGS>                                           44,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,317)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF INVISA, INC.
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 and in connection with the annual report
of Invisa, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Stephen
A. Michael, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

1.       The Company's 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Company's 10-KSB for the year ended
         December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company for said
         period.


/s/  Stephen A. Michael
-------------------------------------------
Stephen A. Michael, Chief Executive Officer

Date:  June 23, 2003

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Invisa, Inc.
and will be retained by Invisa, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

R. CEASAR, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1564 (UNA)

) 

SCOTT HARRIS, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter, brought pro se, is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s motion for leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), ECF No. 2, and the Complaint and Motion to Compel, ECF 

No. 1. The IFP motion will be granted, and this case will be dismissed. 

Plaintiff has sued the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court in his official capacity. 

In addition to injunctive relief, plaintiff seeks monetary damages. See Compl. at 3. The 

Supreme Court “has inherent [and exclusive] supervisory authority over its Clerk.” In re Marin, 

956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (per curiam). Therefore, “a lower court may [not] compel 

the Clerk of the Supreme Court to take any action.” Id.; see Panko v. Rodak, 606 F.2d 168, 171 

n.6 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1081 (1980) (“It seems axiomatic that a lower court

may not order the judges or officers of a higher court to take an action.”). 

In addition, “the Supreme Court Clerk and Clerk’s office staff enjoy absolute immunity 

from a lawsuit for money damages based upon decisions falling within the scope of their official 

duties.” Miller v. Harris, 599 Fed. App’x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (citing Sindram v. 

Suda, 986 F.2d 1459 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (per curiam)); see Reddy v. O’Connor, 520 F. Supp. 2d 

JUN 22 2020
2 

124, 130 (D.D.C. 2007) (actions consisting of the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari and 

the Deputy Clerk’s refusal to file documents concerning a subsequent petition “are 

quintessentially ‘judicial’ in nature because they are ‘an integral part of the judicial process’”) 

(quoting Sindram, 986 F.2d at 1460-61). Therefore, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. 

See Fletcher v. Harris, 790 Fed. App’x 220 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (“The district court correctly denied 

appellant’s motion for injunction and dismissed the case with prejudice, because appellant’s 

claim for money damages against the Clerk of the Supreme Court was barred by absolute 

immunity.”). A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATE: June 22, 2020
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 2
to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) by CapSource
Financial, Inc. (Registrant), I, Fred C. Boethling, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and                      
| |    |                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

|                         |     |                        
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|DATE:    August 6 , 2007 | By: | /s/   Fred C. Boethling
|                         |     |                        
|                         |     | Name: Fred C. Boethling
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                   REMEC, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Three months ended                        Nine months ended
                                        -------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
                                        October 31, 1997     November 3, 1996    October 31, 1997     November 3, 1996
                                        ----------------     ----------------    ----------------     ----------------
<S>                                     <C>                  <C>                 <C>                   <C>    
Net income per common share:
     Net income                           $ 4,933,154           $ 1,376,224        $10,790,951           $ 3,976,656
Weighted average shares outstanding:
     Common Stock                          20,881,171            16,465,853         20,747,233            16,366,006
     Effect of common stock 
         equivalents                          995,377               245,220            785,146               253,388
                                          -----------           -----------        -----------           -----------
                                           21,876,548            16,711,073         21,532,379            16,619,394
                                          -----------           -----------        -----------           -----------
Net income per common share               $      0.23           $      0.08        $      0.50           $      0.24
                                          ===========           ===========        ===========           ===========
</TABLE>


                                     - 17 -
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5694-S5695]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         RECESS UNTIL 2:30 P.M.

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I am advised by staff and the manager of the 
bill on this side, Senator Gorton, that it will be about an hour before 
there will be speakers available. They are 
[[Page S5695]] now in a private session, as I understand it, discussing 
this measure.
  I move that the Senate stand in recess until the hour of 2:30 p.m.
  The motion was agreed to.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 1:22 p.m. recessed until 2:29 p.m.; 
whereupon, the Senate reassembled when called to order by the Presiding 
Officer (Mr. Abraham).
  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I understand there are speakers on the way 
to the floor. In the meantime, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```