alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.4





CERTIFICATION



I, Edmund C. King, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Uniroyal Global Engineered Products, Inc.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                           |  |                        
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:   April 29,
    2016 |  | /s/
     Edmund C. King
|                           |  | Edmund C. King         
|                           |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 8.1

List of Findexa II AS Significant Subsidiaries

Our significant subsidiaries as at December 31, 2002 were as follows:

|Subsidiary                |  | Country of Incorporation |  | % Ownership at
December 31, 2002
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------
|Findexa I AS              |  | Norway                   |  | 100%                            
|Findexa Belgium SCA       |  | Belgium                  |  | 100%                            
|Findexa AS                |  | Norway                   |  | 100%                            
|Findexa France Holding SA |  | France                   |  | 100%                            

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

March 26, 2012

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document.



The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Trustee for SandRidge Mississippian Trust IBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICHMike Ulrich Vice President and Trust Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

NANO CHEMICAL SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Shannon Norwood, the undersigned Interim Chief Financial Officer of Nano Chemical
Systems Holdings, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof:



|1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|/s/ Shannon Norwood                                                          
|Shannon Norwood Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director October 25, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40957 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES ALTON WEST, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CR-161-2

- - - - - - - - - - August 1, 1997 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Alton West appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. West contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the district court erred in denying his motion and amended motion to dismiss the indictment on grounds of prosecutorial vindictiveness. The evidence was sufficient to support West’s conviction.
See United States v. Maltos , 985 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir. 1992);No. 96-40957 -2- United States v. Diaz-Carreon , 915 F.2d 951, 953-54 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court did not err in denying West’s motion and amended motion to dismiss the indictment because West did not demonstrate that circumstances warranted a presumption of vindictiveness or actual vindictiveness. See United States v. Johnson , 91 F.3d 695, 697-99 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Aggarwal , 17 F.3d 737, 744 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE v. BITTING

No. 393P00

Case below: 132 N.C. App. 823

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 20 December 2000.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

This is notice that on May 25, 2010, Noramco, Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an importer of Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to import the listed controlled substance in bulk to manufacture other controlled substances solely in bulk for distribution to the company's customers.

As explained in the Correction to Notice of Application pertaining to Rhodes Technologies, 72 FR 3417 (2007), comments and requests for hearings on applications to import narcotic raw material are not appropriate.

                    As noted in a previous notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substances in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.                

Dated: August 13, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-21750 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: June 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.4


EXPERT CONSENT
  I hereby consent to the use of my name and reference to my name and my “Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated as of February 20, 2012 evaluating Pretium Resources Inc.’s Brucejack Project, and the information contained in my Report as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (ii) the incorporation by reference in Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Very truly yours,
  Fred H. Brown, Pr.Sc.Nat.
 
 Fred H. Brown, Pr.Sc.Nat.
  March 12, 2012
              1
  EXPERT CONSENT
  I hereby consent to the use of my name and reference to my name and my “Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated as of February 20, 2012 evaluating Pretium Resources Inc.’s Brucejack Project, and the information contained in my Report as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (ii) the incorporation by reference in Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Very truly yours,
   Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo.
 Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo.
  March 12, 2012
                 
  2






EXPERT CONSENT
  
  I, Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., on behalf of P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (the “Company”) hereby consent to the use of the Company’s name and to references to the Company’s name and the “Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated as of February 20, 2012 evaluating Pretium Resources Inc.’s Brucejack Project, and the information contained in the Report as described or incorporated by reference in (i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on  Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (ii) the incorporation by reference in Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Very truly yours,
  /s/ Eugene Puritch, P.Eng.
 
 Eugene Puritch, P.Eng.
 President
      3
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Donald W. Prosser, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-KSB of VCG Holding Corp. for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2005; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors: 

(a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuer’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls. 

Date:    March 31,2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1, 2016

t0525 

# Order

Clerk June 1, 2016

152558

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152558

COA: 320629

Wayne CC: 13

- 005757

- FH

LESLIE WAYNE McGINNIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|     |                                                                                                                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |
| ​/s/ Mark D. Klein |
| Name: Mark D. Klein      |
| Date: March 13, 2020     |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



April 11, 2000

The Wiser Oil Company
8115 Preston Road, Suite 400
Dallas, Texas 75225

Gentlemen:

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-44171, 33-62441, 33-44172, 333-22525, and
333-15083) relating to the stock incentive plans of The Wiser Oil Company (the
Company) of our reserves estimates included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
(the Annual Report) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1999, and to
the references to our firm included in the Annual Report. Our estimates of the
oil, condensate, natural gas liquids (shown collectively as "Oil and NGL"), and
natural gas reserves of certain properties owned by the Company are contained in
our reports entitled "Appraisal Report as of December 31, 1999 on Certain
Properties owned by the Wiser Oil Company-Proved Reserves". Reserves estimates
from our reports are included in the sections "Principal Oil and Gas
Properties," "Oil and Gas Reserves," and "Supplemental Financial Information for
the years ending December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 (unaudited)-Oil and Gas
Reserves." Also included in the third section mentioned above are reserves
estimates from our "Appraisal Report as of December 31, 1999 on Certain
Properties owned by the Wiser Oil Company-Proved Reserves." In the sections
"Summary Reserve and Operating Data" and "Oil and Gas Reserves," estimates of
reserves, revenue, and discounted present worth set forth in our above mentioned
reports have been combined with estimates of reserves, revenue, and discounted
present worth prepared by another petroleum consultant. We are necessarily
unable to verify the accuracy of the reserves, revenue, and present worth values
contained in the Annual Report when our estimates have been combined with those
of another firm.

                      Very truly yours,


                      /S/ DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON

                      DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
##### 



EXHIBIT 6 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a), PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alain Raquepas, Vice-President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of CAE Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of CAE Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date: June 28, 2005/s/ Alain RaquepasName: Alain RaquepasTitle: Vice-President Finance andChief
Financial Officer
 2