alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund V (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 16, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson             
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund V
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY BROWN.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### A.J. TENWOOD ASSOCIATES v. ORANGE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING CO.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 200 *N.J.Super.*515)
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis R. Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Elmer's  Restaurants,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

/s/ Dennis R. Miller
----------------------------------
Dennis R. Miller
Secretary and Corporate Controller
September 2, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
annual report on Form 10-K of Point Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Eric Weisblum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: June 14, 2016





|By:    | /s/ Eric Weisblum                                                             | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Eric Weisblum                                                                 | 
|Title: | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
(principal executive officer) | 





A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 5th Bomb Wing awarded 2016 Omaha TrophyPublished June 8, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Austin M. Thomas
                        
                        
                        Minot Air Force Base Public Affairs
                **MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, N.D. (AFNS) --**
                Gen. John E. Hyten, the U.S. Strategic Command commander, presented the 2016 Omaha Trophy to the 5th Bomb Wing at Minot Air Force Base, June 6, 2017.The 5th BW was named the 2016 Omaha Trophy recipient in February 2017, making it the fifth time the unit has been recognized, as the command’s premier strategic bomber wing, in the Strategic Bomber category.“These awards are a direct reflection of the hard work and tireless effort demonstrated by the men and women, in and out of uniform, who support the command,” said Hyten in an article published earlier this year. “USSTRATCOM is a powerful, dominant warfighting command whose ultimate strength is its people, joint and allied warfighters—officers, enlisted and civilians.”The Omaha Trophy, which dates back to the U.S. Air Force’s Strategic Air Command, was originally created in 1971, by the Strategic Command Consultation Committee. At the time, a single trophy was presented annually as a token of appreciation to the command’s best wing.Now the Omaha Trophy is awarded annually to five units that represent USSTRATCOM's mission areas, their role in global operations and USSTRATCOM's continued emphasis on strategic deterrence. Selections are based on formal evaluations, meritorious achievement, safety and other factors such as community involvement and humanitarian actions.During the trophy presentation, Hyten stressed the importance of the deterrence mission to more than 200 5th BW Airmen. He commended the excellence 5th BW Airmen show every day in aiding global deterrence and other missions, and how their support provided around the world is critical to those missions.Air Force 



safety 



AF 



U.S. Strategic Command 



5th Bomb Wing 



USSTRATCOM 



community involvement 



Air Force Base 



appreciation 



global operations 



5th BW 



The Omaha Trophy 



achievement 



humanitarian actions 



strategic bomber 



Minot AFB
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JUAN RIVERA.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Air University wraps-up “mega” NCOA course for Tyndall AFB studentsPublished Dec. 29, 2018
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Charles Welty
                        
                        
                        Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                Air University’s Barnes Center for Enlisted Education graduated Noncommissioned Officer Academy “mega” class 19 Alpha One on Dec. 20, 2018, showcasing total force coordination and support in the aftermath of Hurricane Michael.
In the wake of the hurricane, the Air Force’s educational and professional development of NCOs was going to be severely impacted, according to Col. James Dryjanski, Barnes Center commander. Through coordination across multiple installations and institutions, students scheduled to attend Airey NCOA at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, were still able to get their professional military education experience.
The Barnes Center’s Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy at Gunter Annex, Alabama, hosted two classes combined.
“It was a great class,” said Senior Master Sgt. Jason Keys, SNCOA instructor. “I think one of the things we brought to the table, which you’re not going to get at any other NCO academy, is that in addition to going through the NCOA curriculum we were able to sprinkle in some of that senior NCO perspective. For these guys to be able to have that strategic-level perspective on any of the topics, it was incredibly value added.”
According to Keys, NCOA classes are commonly taught by a peer who may not even have the same amount or even less experience in the Air Force as the students. For them to be able to learn from the SNCOA instructors, who each usually have around 15 to 20 years of Air Force experience, made for an invaluable PME opportunity.
In order to properly train this amount of students, the SNCOA brought in five NCOA instructors from various schools around the Air Force to assist with the teaching of the curriculum.
“We are trained up on the SNCOA curriculum, which is just different than the NCOA curriculum,” Keys said. “They would come here and we would meet with them every day and would really help us through any road bumps we would come across and clarify anything we would see in the lesson plan. I think they were instrumental in helping us out. For me, it was really great to see that, as a PME community, we were able to band together and help these students out.”
At the moment, plans for Tyndall AFB to once again receive these students is uncertain. AU’s SNCOA has said that they are prepared to host NCOA students again if necessary.Noncommissioned Officer Academy 



“mega” class 19 Alpha One 



Air University 



AU 



Barnes Center 



Maxwell AFB 



Gunter 



Air Force 



AF 



AETC 



Air Education and Training Command 



Noncommisioned Officer Academy 



NCOA 



Hurricane Michael 



total force 



Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy 



SNCOA 



Air University’s Barnes Center for Enlisted Education
Agreement with Robert J. Angerer



 Exhibit 10(n) 

Agreement to Capitalize Coastal 

Robert J. Angerer, Sr. (Angerer) purposes to see CCO and CPC debt free, meet all their obligations and perform further work on the gas
prospect. He would agree to provide $1 Million in capital funding to Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (CCO), and for the agreed purposes, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Angerer agrees to pay invoices in the total amount $250,000 to be used for the following purposes: 

  

	 	A.	Perform a new nitrogen frac on the Federal 1-19A well, in the Phillips formation to establish natural gas production from the well. In the even this frac on the Phillips formation is unsuccessful, Angerer may proceed to
plug off the Phillips formation, perforate the Eagle formation and have a nitrogen frac performed on that formation to establish natural gas production. 

  

	 	B.	Abandon the two wells on the State lease. 

  

	 	C.	Any balance from these operations less than the $250,000 total shall be paid to CCO at the conclusion of the operations to be used to complete the SEC filings of CCO. 


 

	 	2.	Angerer will by October 15, 2012, wire to CCP $750,000 to be used for the following purposes: 

  

	 	A.	Payoff all outstanding obligations to parties involved with the oil and gas operations of the company. ($250,000 estimated.) 

  

	 	B.	Keep filings in compliance and hold an annual meeting. ($194,200 estimated.) 

  

	 	C.	Lease remaining private acreage within the Star Buck East Prospect if completions are successful, and for pursuing a Federal Exploratory Unit before lease expiration. ($100,000 estimated.) 


 

	 	D.	Pay Phillip Ware $205,800 to settle all accounts, with no further accruals for him for salary or other items. Phillip Ware would also be granted the option to purchase 1 Million shares of CCO stock at the purchase price
of $0.03 per share up to December 31, 2017. In exchange, Phillip Ware would resign as an officer and director in CCO and Coastal Petroleum Company and mutual releases would be executed. The Directors remaining shall appoint successors as
needed. 









	 	3.	CCO will issue CCO common stock to Angerer for each of his capital investments at the conversion of $0.03 per share. 

  

	 	4.	CCO accepts Angerer’s partial performance under the earlier October 2011 Agreement between the parties as complete and that Angerer is due his prorated shares of stock that will be issued as soon as possible.


  

	 	5.	Prior to providing any of the funding, CCO shall assure Angerer that each of the expected purposes have been accepted by the Companies, including the agreement by Phillip Ware to item 2. D. above. 


 

									
		 		 		 	Coastal Caribbean Oils and Minerals, Ltd.
				
	 Date:
	 	 September 12, 2012
	 		 	 /s/    Herbert D.
Haughton        

		 		 		 	By:	 	Herbert D. Haughton, Director
				
		 		 		 	Coastal Petroleum Company
				
	 Date:
	 	 September 12, 2012
	 		 	 /s/    Herbert D.
Haughton        

		 		 		 	By:	 	Herbert D. Haughton, Director
				
	 Date:
	 	 September 12, 2012
	 		 	 /s/    Robert J. Angerer,
Sr.      

		 		 		 	Robert J. Angerer, Sr.
Exhibit 99.1

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplemental Information

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors 

Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.:

We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements of Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and our report dated February 17, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

We have also previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the consolidated balance sheets of the Company, including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012 (none of which is presented herein), and we expressed unqualified opinions on those consolidated financial statements.

The senior securities table included in Part II, Item 5 of the Annual Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021, under the caption “Senior Securities” (the Senior Securities Table) has been subjected to audit procedures performed in conjunction with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Senior Securities Table is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our audit procedures included determining whether the Senior Securities Table reconciles to the respective consolidated financial statements or the underlying accounting and other records, as applicable, and performing procedures to test the completeness and accuracy of the information presented in the Senior Securities Table. In forming our opinion on the Senior Securities Table, we evaluated whether the Senior Securities Table, including its form and content, is presented in conformity with the instructions to Form N-2. In our opinion, the Senior Securities Table is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated financial statements as a whole. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York

February 17, 2022
Exhibit 31.2

                            FORM 10-QSB CERTIFICATION

         I, Leslie I. Handler, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Encompass
Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30, 2004;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


May 30, 2006                     ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE I. HANDLER
                                 --------------------------
                                 Leslie I. Handler, President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

Order 

May 29, 2009 

138168 

138179 

138182 

BRIGGS TAX SERVICE, L.L.C., 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 138168 

 COA: 278865 

MTT: 00-319592 

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, and DETROIT 

BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

Respondents-Appellants, 

and 

CITY OF DETROIT and WAYNE COUNTY 

TREASURER, 

 Respondents. 

_________________________________________/ 

BRIGGS TAX SERVICE, L.L.C., 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 138179 

 COA: 278865 

MTT: 00-319592 

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DETROIT 

BOARD OF EDUCATION, and WAYNE 

COUNTY TREASURER, 

 Respondents, 

and 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 29, 2009 

0526 

 

2

BRIGGS TAX SERVICE, L.L.C., 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 138182 

 COA: 278865 

MTT: 00-319592 

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DETROIT 

BOARD OF EDUCATION, and CITY OF 

DETROIT, 

 Respondents, 

and 

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the December 23, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are GRANTED, limited to the 

issue of whether the petitioner’s dispute regarding the collection of property taxes for tax 

years 2002, 2003, and 2004 involved a mutual mistake of fact made by the assessing 

officer and the taxpayer such that the three-year limitation period of MCL 211.53a 

applies to the petitioner’s claims. 

 Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case 

may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2570 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 

governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 

whether a child has special needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Ms. HEITKAMP, 

and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize 

Indian tribal governments for purposes of determining 

under the adoption credit whether a child has special 

needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Adoption Parity 

5 Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2570 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR 

2 PURPOSES OF DETERMINING UNDER THE 

3 ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 

4 SPECIAL NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining child with 

7 special needs) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or In9 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘a State’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or In12 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘such 

13 State’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: CMSAF Talks Promotion Changes / C-17 Humanitarian MissionPublished Feb. 8, 2019
                        
                        By Senior Airman Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                On this look Around the Air Force, Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth Wright discusses the upcoming changes to senior noncommissioned officer promotions and C-17 Globemaster IIIs bring aid to three different countries. Hosted by Senior Airman Jasmine Vanderheyden.</iframe

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **CMSAF official Facebook page**
- **One weekend, three countries, helps nearly 130,000 people**
 CMSAF testing Humanitarian C-17 Air Force TV promotion honduras Haiti e-9 Guatemala WAPS E-8 Featured Videos AF Reports SrA Jasmine Vanderheyden E-7 ATAF Around the Air Force Kaleth Wright