alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Darryl E. Akers, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Poage Bankshares, Inc.;

2) Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 17, 2012



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Darryl E. Akers                                                       
|Darryl E. Akers Vice
Chairman, Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20332

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES RAY LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR H 95-191

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Ray Lewis appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion to dismiss his indictment on double jeopardy grounds. 

Lewis contends that the district court erred in denying his

motion to dismiss his indictment because he was prosecuted

previously by the State of Texas for the same offense, possession

of cocaine with intent to distribute. A double jeopardy

violation does not occur when a defendant is prosecuted first in
No. 96-20332

- 2 -

state court and later in federal court on similar charges. See

Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82, 89 (1985); United States v. Moore,

958 F.2d 646, 650 (5th Cir. 1992). Lewis does not argue that the

federal and state governments colluded to prosecute him twice for

the same offense. The district court did not err in dismissing

Lewis’ motion to dismiss his indictment on double jeopardy

grounds. 

AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force selects 2,311 BSC, LAF officers for promotionPublished July 19, 2017
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 2,311 active-duty officers for promotion to colonel, lieutenant colonel and major during the 2017B Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel Biomedical Sciences Corps and Major Line of the Air Force and Biomedical Sciences Corps central selection boards.

The boards selected 14 lieutenant colonels for promotion to colonel, 53 majors for promotion to lieutenant colonel and 2,244 captains for promotion to major.

To view the lists, go to myPers, select “Active Duty Officer” from the drop down menu, search “Promotions Home” and scroll down to the promotion select lists.

For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.AFPC 



AETC 



officer promotions 



LAF 



Maj 



Col 



BSC 



CY17B 



LtCol 



medical corps 



line officer 



force management
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1932 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1932

   To amend the Small Business Act to increase SBIR and STTR program 
                             expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2007

  Mr. Bayh (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Snowe, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. 
    Vitter) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to increase SBIR and STTR program 
                             expenditures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SBIR AND STTR PROGRAM EXPENDITURES.

    (a) SBIR Program Expenditures.--Section 9(f)(1) of the Small 
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(f)(1)) is amended by striking subparagraphs 
(A) through (C) and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) not less than 2.5 percent of such budget in 
                fiscal year 2008;
                    ``(B) not less than 3.0 percent of such budget in 
                fiscal year 2009;
                    ``(C) not less than 3.5 percent of such budget in 
                fiscal year 2010;
                    ``(D) not less than 4.0 percent of such budget in 
                fiscal year 2011;
                    ``(E) not less than 4.5 percent of such budget in 
                fiscal year 2012; and
                    ``(F) not less than 5.0 percent of such budget in 
                fiscal year 2013 and each fiscal year thereafter,''.
    (b) STTR Program Expenditures.--Section 9(n)(1)(B) of the Small 
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(n)(1)(B)) is amended by striking clauses 
(i) and (ii) and inserting the following:
                            ``(i) not less than 0.3 percent in fiscal 
                        year 2008;
                            ``(ii) not less than 0.36 percent in fiscal 
                        year 2009;
                            ``(iii) not less than 0.42 percent in 
                        fiscal year 2010;
                            ``(iv) not less than 0.48 percent in fiscal 
                        year 2011;
                            ``(v) not less than 0.54 percent in fiscal 
                        year 2012;
                            ``(vi) not less than 0.6 percent in fiscal 
                        year 2013 and each fiscal year thereafter.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter H. van Oppen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Advanced Digital Information Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 11, 2005 |  | /s/ PETER H. VAN OPPEN                                                             
|                      |  | Peter H. van Oppen, Chair and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### RHODA EPSTEIN v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**728 CAF 13-00019**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ZACHARY R.

------------------------------------------ ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
DUANE R., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

EVELYNE A. O’SULLIVAN, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL).

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.) entered December 19, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, terminated the parental rights of respondent.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights with respect to his son on the ground of mental illness. We conclude that petitioner met its burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that the father is “presently and for the foreseeable future unable, by reason of mental illness . . . , to provide proper and adequate care for [the] child” (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; see Matter of Christopher B., Jr. [Christopher B., Sr.] , 104 AD3d 1188, 1188; Matter of Alberto C. [Tibet H.] , 96 AD3d 1487, 1488, lv denied 19 NY3d 813). Contrary to the father’s contention, petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence establishing that he is presently suffering from a mental illness that “is manifested by a disorder or disturbance in behavior, feeling, thinking or judgment to such an extent that if such child were placed in . . . the custody of the [father], the child would be in danger of becoming a neglected child” (§ 384-b [6] [a]; see Matter of Destiny V. [Lynette V.] , 106 AD3d 1495, 1495). The father’s contention that petitioner undermined his relationship with the child by limiting his visitation time and thus failed to establish that it made diligent efforts to strengthen and encourage his relationship with his child is of no moment. “[U]nlike [a] case where parental rights are terminated due to permanent neglect**-2- 728 CAF 13-00019**  . . . , no such showing is required when the ground for termination is mental illness” ( Matter of Demetrius F ., 176 AD2d 940, 941; see Matter of Michael D. , 306 AD2d 938, 938; see generally Matter of Michael F. , 16 AD3d 1116, 1116).

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT
      31.2




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Arthur
      N. Robins, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Encompass Holdings, Inc.




2.  Based
      on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
      or
      omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
      of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
      respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on my
      knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in
      this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings, Inc. as of, and
      for,
      the periods presented in this report;




4.  I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:




a.  Designed
      such
      disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
      to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this report is being prepared;




b.  Evaluated
      the
      effectiveness of Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation.




Date:
      November 15, 2006


/s/
      Arthur N. Robins


Arthur
      N.
      Robins


Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Phoenix New Media Limited (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Qianli Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: April 27, 2012



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Qianli Liu         
|Name:  |  | Qianli Liu             
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Jonathan
C. Clark, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in
respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2011-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of
Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included
as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by ACS Education Services, Inc., as subservicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.  Date: March 23, 2012/s/ Jonathan C. ClarkJonathan C. Clark President
and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer) SLM Funding LLC
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Guild.com, Inc.

   We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated January 31, 2001, with respect to the financial
statements of Guild.com, Inc. included in the Registration Statement (Form S-4)
and related Prospectus of Ashford.com for the registration of 8,724,600 shares
of its common stock.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 28, 2001
Exhibit 32 

Certification Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /S/ JOSHUA EASTERLY  |
|---------------------------|
| Name:                     | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:                    | Chief Executive Officer |

Date: February 17, 2022

 

| /S/ IAN SIMMONDS  |
|------------------------|
| Name:                  | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer |

Date: February 17, 2022

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION


PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





This
certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





I, Selim
A. Bassoul, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of The Middleby Corporation (the “Registrant”), certify, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period  ended April 4, 2009 of the Registrant (the “Report”),
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      aspects, the financial `condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Date:  May
14, 2009





/s/ Selim A. BassoulSelim
      A. Bassoul