alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   837
<PP&E>                                           6,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              584
<BONDS>                                          1,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,191
<SALES>                                            443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   449
<CGS>                                              418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (4)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (26)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (26)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
<FN>
<F1>NET OF INTEREST INCOME, $4 MILLION, AND CAPITALIZED INTEREST, $1 MILLION
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 100 White Clay Center, Suite 102 |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Newark, DE  19711 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 12th Floor, MC 482-B12-C24 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|     |
|-----|
|     |  |
| Re: | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the “Issuer”) |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D513]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings

  No committee meetings were held.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000771677
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-B LTD PATNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         404,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               404,834
<PP&E>                                       4,110,288
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,439,730)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,075,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          328,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,747,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,075,392
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.06
        

</TABLE>
Saitta 

a 

s 

Pickering 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SHAUN MICHAEL HERZOG, 

Appellant, 

No. 69521 

FILED 

JAN 2.8 2016 

vs. 

KELLIE HERZOG, 

Respondent. 

TRACE K LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

sr 

DEPUTY CLER 

This is an appeal from a divorce decree. Second Judicial 

District Court, Family Court Division, Washoe County; Frances Doherty, 

Judge. 

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant 

to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of 

appeal was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, 

and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School 

District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that an oral 

pronouncement from the bench or a minute order is ineffective for any 

purpose). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Hardesty 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

14 - ozqY7 
cc: Hon. Frances Doherty, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Shaun Michael Herzog 

Woodburn & Wedge 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) / 947A e 2
Exhibit 12.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James Ratcliffe, Chairman of Ineos Group Holdings plc, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ineos Group Holdings plc; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant, as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of theend of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this annual report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarise and report financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
**Date: April 29, 2005**
/s/ James Ratcliffe
James Ratcliffe
Exhibit 10(a)(3)

                         VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


      AMENDMENT, made and entered into as of the 21st day of September, 1998 to
Employment Agreement dated as of the 1st day of March, 1995 (the "Original
Agreement"), by and between Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc., a North Carolina
corporation (the "Company"), and L. Richardson Preyer, Jr. (the "Employee").

      WHEREAS, the Original Agreement contains a noncompetition covenant
generally providing that the Employee will not for a term of one year following
termination of his employment with the Company compete with the Company; and

      WHEREAS, since 1995 the telecommunications industry has dramatically
changed such that the language of the noncompetition agreement is now overly
broad;

      WHEREAS, the parties wish to revise the noncompetition in a manner that
will protect the Company while not inappropriately limiting the activities of
the Employee;

      NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

      1. Section 9(a)(i) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

            "(i) He will not, directly or indirectly, own any interest in,
      manage, operate, control, be employed by, render consulting or advisory
      services to, or participate in or be connected with the management or
      control of any business that is then engaged in the operation of a
      cellular telephone or paging system (or any competitive communication
      system then operated by the Company) in substantial competition with the
      Company in the Territory if the involvement or services of the Employee
      with such business relates to its operations located within the
      Territory;"

      2. Except as amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day
and year first above written.

                              VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC.



                              By:  /s/ Stephen R. Leeolou                 
                                 -------------------------
                                   Stephen R. Leeolou
                                   President


                                   /s/ L. Richardson Preyer, Jr.          
                                 -------------------------------
                                   L. Richardson Preyer, Jr.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1984

RUFUS JULIUS ANDERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. J. A. PIPER ROOFING CO. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr. , District Judge. ( 6:21

- cv - 02901

- DCC )

Submitted : January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1984 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Rufus Julius Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s orde rs granting Defendant summary judgment on Anderson’s employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 ; and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 , and denying Anderson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We dismiss th is appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[ T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order denying Anderson Rule 59(e) relief on April 13, 2023, and mailed a physical copy of the order to Anderson on June 1, 2023

. Anderson
filed the underlying notice of appeal on September 18, 2023 . Because Anderson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1984 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2617 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2617

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2014

 Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Scott, Mr. Sessions, 
 Mr. Coburn, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. 
  Alexander) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law to a wage requirement of 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall 
after the date of the enactment of this Act be null and void.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act but shall not affect any contract in 
existence on such date of enactment or made pursuant to invitation for 
bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
No. 87-6498.

#### Elliott *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
News United States Air Force
 Medal of Honor recipient passes away at 85Published May 3, 2017
                        
                        
                        Congressional Medal of Honor Society
                **MOUNT PLEASANT, S.C. (AFNS)  --**
                Col. Leo K. Thorsness, Medal of Honor recipient, passed away May 2, 2017, in St. Augustine, Florida, at the age of 85, according to the Congressional Medal of Honor Society. 
Thorsness was born Feb. 14, 1932, in Walnut Grove, Minnesota, where he attended school and earned the rank of Eagle Scout, the highest rank attainable in the Boy Scouts. He attended South Dakota State College in 1950. A year later, he enlisted in the Air Force and went on to graduate from the Aviation Cadet Program with a commission earning his wings. 
He served as a fighter pilot with Strategic Air Command and Tactical Air Command before being assigned to Vietnam with the 357th Tactical Fighter Squadron. While flying a mission in April 1967, his wingman was shot down. Thorsness, critically low on fuel, circled their parachutes and engaged four MIG-17 aircraft in a dogfight damaging one and driving the others away. Eleven days after this dramatic mission he was shot down over North Vietnam and subsequently captured and interned by the North Vietnamese at the Hoa Lo Prison, nicknamed the Hanoi Hilton. He was released March 4, 1973, almost six years after he was shot down. 
He was awarded the MOH by President Richard M. Nixon at a White House ceremony October 15, 1973. Thorsness retired from the Air Force in 1973 at the rank of colonel. 
He is survived by his wife Gaylee and family. Funeral services are pending. There are 74 MOH recipients alive today. 
The Congressional Medal of Honor Society was chartered by Congress in 1958 and consists exclusively of the living recipients of our nation’s highest award for bravery in combat, the Medal of Honor. Those who wear this light blue ribbon and medal around their neck are recipients of this prestigious award; they are not winners. Although it is common to refer to the medal as the Congressional Medal of Honor, it is simply named the Medal of Honor, although, as stated, Congress did establish the society as the Congressional Medal of Honor Society.family 



POW 



Vietnam 



Wingman 



cadet 



fighter pilot 



SAC 



Eagle Scout 



TAC 



Medal of Honor
News United States Air Force
 The ‘Airmen We Need’: Air Force personnel updatePublished Sept. 17, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Victoria H. Taylor
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Lt. Gen. Brian T. Kelly, Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services, outlined the Air Force’s strategy for the “Airmen We Need” campaign at the Air, Space, Cyber Conference, Sept. 17, 2018, in National Harbor.
To further their development, Kelly said total force Airmen must have proper manning, be trained to combat future adversaries, remain joint-minded and mission focused, set clear expectations and mentorship and empower their subordinates to lead and make decisions. 
“We are at the epicenter of our opportunity to impact our most important weapon system—our Airmen,” said Kelly. 
Additionally, in order to maintain fighting forces, Kelly said a talent management system outlining the Air Force values, rewards and incentives needs implementing to empower performance. 
Kelly said the Air Force is working diligently to grow Airmen into qualified leaders throughout their careers.AFA 



Air Force 



air 



space 



cyber 



AFPC 



personnel 



growing the force 



readiness
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period
ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Joshua Easterly, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and Alan Kirshenbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ MICHAEL FISHMANName:

Michael FishmanTitle:

Co-Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 14, 2014



/S/ JOSHUA EASTERLYName:

Joshua EasterlyTitle:

Co-Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 14, 2014



/S/ ALAN KIRSHENBAUMName:

Alan KirshenbaumTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 14, 2014

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 4-F of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the Company) on for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Purcell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 19, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen Purcell    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Stephen Purcell        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer