alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2260

___________________________

Alex Anil George

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Benjamin M. Belmont

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

 ____________

 Submitted: December 9, 2021

Filed: December 14, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Alex George appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se diversity

action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See

1The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.
Wallace v. Wallace, 736 F.3d 764, 766-67 (8th Cir. 2013) (existence of subject matter

jurisdiction is reviewed de novo; federal suit is inextricably intertwined with state

domestic proceeding where effect of remedy in federal suit is to modify, nullify, or

predetermine ruling of state proceeding); Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861-62 (8th Cir.

1994) (when cause of action closely relates to but does not precisely fit into the

contours of an action for divorce, federal courts will generally abstain from exercising

jurisdiction). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CLARENCE DAVIS.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                      48,885,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,458,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (698,006)
<INVENTORY>                                 28,142,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           103,250,952
<PP&E>                                      57,936,394
<DEPRECIATION>                            (31,094,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,741,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,849,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       210,810
<OTHER-SE>                                 122,783,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,994,594
<SALES>                                    111,850,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,850,276
<CGS>                                       77,861,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,861,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,871,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,833,624)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,784,763
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,993,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,790,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,790,951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2406 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 482
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2406

   To amend title XII of the Public Health Service Act to expand the 
    definition of trauma to include thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                radioactive, and other extrinsic agents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2014

 Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Portman, Mr. Burr, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Warren, 
and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

                             July 23, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Harkin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XII of the Public Health Service Act to expand the 
    definition of trauma to include thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                radioactive, and other extrinsic agents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Trauma Care Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. TRAUMA DEFINITION.

    (a) Revised Definition Under Trauma Systems Grants Programs.--
Paragraph (4) of section 1231 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300d-31) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Trauma.--The term `trauma' means an injury resulting 
        from exposure to--
                    ``(A) a mechanical force; or
                    ``(B) another extrinsic agent, including an 
                extrinsic agent that is thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                or radioactive.''.
    (b) Revised Definition Under Interagency Program for Trauma 
Research.--Paragraph (3) of section 1261(h) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-61(h)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) The term `trauma' means an injury resulting from 
        exposure to--
                    ``(A) a mechanical force; or
                    ``(B) another extrinsic agent, including an 
                extrinsic agent that is thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                or radioactive.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 482

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend title XII of the Public Health Service Act to expand the 
    definition of trauma to include thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                radioactive, and other extrinsic agents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Removal of Listed Property

    Pursuant to Sec.  60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, comments are being 
accepted on the following properties being considered for removal from 
the National Register of Historic Places. Comments may be forwarded by 
United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic 
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 
20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, 
National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 
20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be 
submitted by September 16, 2010.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

    Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resources:

ARKANSAS

Howard County

First Christian Church, N. Main St., Nashville, 82000831

Montgomery County

Lee Hall Depot, 114 US 270, Mount Ida, 01001231

[FR Doc. 2010-21770 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F/A of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the Company) on for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arun Menawat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: July 17, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Arun Menawat                     
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Arun Menawat                         
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The New York and Erie Rail Road Company v. Cook.

Upon a case made, a party cannot move to enter a non-suit, or for a new trial, on a ground not distinctly taken at the trial, if it be such as might have been obviated by proof, had it been presented at the trial.

A stockholder of a stock corporation, is a competent witness for the corporation under the recent statutes.

(Before Oakley, Ch. J., and Paíne, J.)

May *24;*

June 8, 1850.

This was an action against a stockholder, to recover calls on his shares made by order of the board of directors.

On the trial, Morris Ketchum was called as a witness for the plaintiffs, and it being admitted that he was then a stockholder of the company, the defendant objected to his competency, the objection was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

After the plaintiffs rested, the defendant moved for a non-suit, which was denied, and an exception taken. The plaintiffs had a verdict, and the defendants on a case, moved, for a new trial. The opinion of the court states all that is material to the *points*reported,

S. *Sanxay,*for the defendant,

*H. E.*Davies, for the plaintiffs.

By the Court.—Oakley, Ch. J.

We have no doubt that Mr. Ketchum was a competent witness, under the recent provisions of law on that subject.

At the trial, the defendant moved for a non-suit, without specifying any *ground for it.*He now states, as a ground for a non-suit, that some material allegations were not made in the declaration, and that others were *not*proved. As for example, that there was no proof of the organization of the company, and none that the defendant had received notice of the calls made on the stock, or that any notice was given as required by the charter. The others are of the same description.

It is a well established rule, that a party Cannot move for at *733new trial, or for leave to enter a non-suit, on a point not distinctly taken at the trial, if it be such a point as might have been obviated by proof, if it had been then raised. In this case, every ground now presented to us, is of that character. All might, as we cannot fail to see, have been obviated, either by amending the declaration or by evidence.

If the objections were in their nature such that they could not have been obviated if made at the trial, probably a different rule would be applied.

New trial denied.
News United States Air Force
 Edwards AFB members win top DoD maintenance awardPublished Dec. 18, 2017
                        
                        By Kenji Thuloweit
                        
                        
                        412th Test Wing Public Affairs
                **EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                Members of the 412th Test Wing’s Emerging Technologies Combined Test Force and the 412th Maintenance Group won the Department of Defense 2017 Maintenance Innovation Challenge People's Choice Award for using small unmanned aircraft systems to conduct exterior maintenance inspections on large aircraft.
Top DoD maintenance leaders handed out the award during the DoD Maintenance Symposium held at the Calvin L. Rampton Salt Palace Convention Center in Salt Lake City, Dec. 4-7, 2017.
The Edwards Air Force Base team competed against five other finalists from the armed forces in the DoD Maintenance Innovation Challenge. Each team presented their available technologies, best business practices and innovative maintenance processes to the maintenance community.
Senior leaders from the DoD’s Maintenance Executive Steering Committee, the Joint Group on Depot Maintenance and the Industrial Base Commanders Peer to Peer Group, selected the Maintenance Innovation Challenge winner during the maintenance symposium plenary session and presented them with the 2017 Maintenance Innovation Challenge trophy. Attendees then voted to select the Peoples’ Choice Award, which went to the Edwards AFB team. 
According to the DoD, the objective of the innovation challenge is to raise awareness in the maintenance community to available technologies, best business practices and innovative maintenance processes, while engaging senior maintenance leaders in assessing and prioritizing promising technology to deliver innovative, agile and affordable maintenance capabilities.
Team Edwards’ 2017 DOD Maintenance Innovation Challenge People's Choice Award Winners
Timothy Morris, 912nd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron
Christopher Nagel, 412th MXG
Charles Ivory, 412th MXG
Danilo Dijamco, 412th MXG
Cherisse Lawson, 412th MXG
Maj. Dan Riley II, Emerging Technologies CTF director
David Freeman, Emerging Technologies CTF
Chris Eaton, Emerging Technologies CTF
Maj. William Niblack, Emerging Technologies CTF
Capt. Justin Merrick, Emerging Technologies CTFEdwards AFB 



Salt Lake City 



412th Test Wing 



412th Maintenance Group 



DOD 



2017 Maintenance Innovation Challenge People’ s Choice Award 



Aircraft 



maintenance 



DoD Maintenance Innovation Challenge
EXHIBIT 10.2

                        AMENDMENT TO EQUITY AND DEFERRED
                         COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS


         Amendment, dated as of April 19, 1999, to the Reebok International Ltd.
Equity and Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the "Plan").

         The Plan shall be amended as follows:

         1. Section 7(d)(1) shall be deleted in its entirety and the following
language shall be substituted therefor:

            (i)      Each option shall become exercisable at such time or
                     times, and subject to such conditions, as the
                     Committee may specify. The Committee may at any time
                     and from time to time accelerate the time at which
                     all or any part of the option may be exercised.

         2. A new Section 7A shall be added to the Plan as follows:

         7A.      TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DISCRETIONARY OPTION GRANTS

                  In addition to the award of options pursuant to Section 7
                  above, the Committee may from time to time award options to
                  any Eligible Director in such amount and subject to such terms
                  and conditions as the Committee may specify. The award of any
                  such options pursuant to this Section 7A shall be subject to
                  the provisions of clauses (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h)
                  of Section 7.
#### Esther SWEETWINE, Joined by Her Husband, Theodore Sweetwine, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Rudolph TOWNSEND, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name of The Anglers Hotel, Miami Beach, Florida, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

M. S. Salomon and Weissbuch & Silver-man, all of Miami,- for plaintiffs in error.

Mitchell D. Price & Charles W. Zaring and Robert S. Florence, all of Miami, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for the respective parties.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PROTEIN DATABASES, INC'S JUNE 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<NAME> PROTEIN DATABASES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         280,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     44,758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               740,303
<PP&E>                                         991,345
<DEPRECIATION>                               (708,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,036,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,597
<OTHER-SE>                                     863,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,036,570
<SALES>                                        909,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               909,349
<CGS>                                          349,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,361,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (451,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (451,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (451,887)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NEELAM UPPAL,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO,

Appellee.

No. 2D20-964

September 15, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Linda R. Allan, 

Judge.

Bradley E Essman of Bradley E Essman JD, LL.M, St. Petersburg, 

for Appellant. 

Mary J. Walter of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 5




           [LETTERHEAD OF AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P.]


                                 April 5, 2001

Tut Systems, Inc.
5964 W. Las Positas Blvd.
Pleasanton, California 94588

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel to Tut Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the proposed registration of 65,000 shares of the
Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Common Stock"), as
described in a registration statement on Form S-8 relating to the Common Stock
to be issued under the Company's Orga Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), which
registration statement is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Registration Statement").

     We have, as counsel, examined such corporate records, certificates and
other documents and reviewed such questions of law as we have deemed necessary,
relevant or appropriate to enable us to render the opinions listed below. In
rendering such opinions, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures and
the authenticity of all documents examined by us. As to various questions of
fact material to such opinions, we have relied upon representations of the
Company.

     Based upon such examination and representations, we advise you that, in our
opinion:

     A.   The shares of Common Stock to be issued under the Plan that are to be
registered pursuant to the Registration Statement have been duly and validly
authorized by the Company.

     B.   The shares of Common Stock to be issued under the Plan that are to be
registered pursuant to the Registration Statement, when issued and delivered in
accordance with the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
<PAGE>

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.

Tut Systems, Inc.
April 5, 2001
Page 2

     We consent to the reference to this firm in the Registration Statement and
to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5 to the Registration Statement.


                                   Sincerely,


                                   /s/ AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P.

                                   AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  About Us
  The Book
  Duty Badges
 Awards and Ranks: Duty Badges Search
 Search
 All Images All DocumentsTesttest 2Test 3
 Upload Date Upload DateDocument DateTitle
  Full Size (2.38 MB)
 
 MTL 81st Training Support Squadron 81st Training Wing
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit