alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.5

 

Second Amendment to Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.

Amended and Restated 2006 Omnibus Plan

 

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO OSIRIS THERAPEUTICS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 OMNIBUS PLAN, of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), amends the Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Omnibus Plan (as previously existing or as amended, or amended and restated, from time to time, as the context dictates, the “Plan”), as hereinafter set forth.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Plan.

 

1.                                      The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued at any time pursuant to awards granted under the Plan has been increased by 750,000, from 2,250,000 to 3,000,000, subject to further adjustment from time to time provided under the terms of the Plan, and to that end, the first sentence of Section 3.3 of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:

 

“Subject to the provisions of Section 4.1(e) (relating to adjustment for changes in Common Stock), the maximum number of shares that may be issued under this Plan shall not exceed in the aggregate 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock.”

 

2.                                      The termination date of the Plan has been extended from June 11, 2022 to May 6, 2024, and to that end, the last sentence of Section 10.2 of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:

 

“Unless sooner terminated by the Committee, this Plan will terminate on May 6, 2024; it being acknowledged, however, for the avoidance of doubt, that any awards granted or made prior to any termination will not be affected thereby.”

 

3.                                      The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that any individual may receive during any calendar year under the Plan has been increased from 125,000 to 150,000, and to that end the last sentence of Section 3.3 of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:

 

“Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, in no event shall any Eligible Person receive in any calendar year Benefits under this Plan involving more than 150,000 shares of Common Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.1(e)).”

 

The foregoing amendments to the Plan were approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and the stockholders of the Company in accordance with applicable law effective as of May 6, 2014, and by order of the Board of Directors of the Company, this Second Amendment to Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Omnibus Plan shall be appended to and become part of the Plan.
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, D.C. 20549



                                   FORM 8-K


                                CURRENT REPORT

    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  May 15, 2001



                           CROSS TIMBERS OIL COMPANY
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



           Delaware                     1-10662                  75-2347769
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)       (IRS Employer
       of incorporation)                                     Identification No.)



     810 Houston Street, Suite 2000, Fort Worth, Texas              76102
          (Address of principal executive offices)               (Zip Code)



                                (817) 870-2800
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
<PAGE>

Item 5.   Other Events.

Company Name Change

On May 15, 2001, Cross Timbers announced that it will adopt a new name, XTO
Energy Inc., effective June 1, 2001.  The Company will continue to be listed on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "XTO".

Three-for-Two Common Stock Split

At the May 15, 2001 annual meeting, stockholders of Cross Timbers approved an
increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock to 250 million. As a
result, the Company's previously announced three-for-two stock split will
proceed as scheduled. The Board of Directors declared the three-for-two split of
its outstanding common stock for stockholders of record at the close of business
on May 23, 2001. The stock split will be effected in the form of a stock
dividend, which will be mailed on June 5, 2001. Cash will be paid in lieu of
fractional shares based on the New York Stock Exchange closing price of the
Company's common stock on May 23, 2001. The Company will have approximately 122
million shares outstanding after the stock split.

Increased Common Stock Dividend

On May 15, 2001, Cross Timbers also announced that its Board of Directors
increased the Company's regular quarterly common stock cash dividend by 50% to
one cent per share on the post-split outstanding common stock. This cash
dividend will be paid on July 13, 2001 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on June 29, 2001.

                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                                  SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                    CROSS TIMBERS OIL COMPANY


Date: May 24, 2001                  By: /s/ Bennie G. Kniffen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Bennie G. Kniffen
                                            Senior Vice President and Controller

                                      -3-
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LARRY SMITH.

March 19, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### LONG ISLAND TRUST COMPANY v. TONY TALARICO.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 AF Sports seeks softball players for training camps, championshipsPublished June 27, 2017
                        
                        
                        Air Force Services Activity
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force is looking for men and women softball players to attend trial camps Aug. 31-Sept. 17, 2017, with the potential to compete in the Armed Forces Championships Sept. 18-24 and USA Nationals Softball Championships Sept. 29-Oct. 1. 
Those interested can download an **Air Force Form 303** at and submit it via **myPERS** no later than July 22.  Athletes must have their leadership’s approval to apply.
The trial camps and Armed Forces Championships are at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, and the nationals are in Oklahoma City.
Continued support of the Air Force Fitness and Sports Program enables the Air Force to build strong, competitive teams who showcase the service at Armed Forces Championships and tournaments, said John Kundinger, Air Force Services Activity acting director of operations. 
For more information, email marcus.darnell@us.af.mil or Trymond.rubin@us.af.mil.fitness 



recreation 



softball 



Armed Forces championship 



AFSVA 



AF Sports 



JB San Antionio 



atheletics 



sports
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

The schedule contains summary financial information from Trump's Castle Funding,
Inc. This data has been extracted from the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine month period ended
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Financial Statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000770618
<NAME>                    Trump's Castle Funding, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,985
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,242
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (32,242)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-040-CV

DEBRA A. WILKERSON	APPELLANT

	V.

KAREN HOUSTON	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On February 8, 2007, we notified Appellant that we were concerned this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared that the notice of appeal was not timely filed.  We stated that the appeal might be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.  Appellant has not responded to our notification.

	The trial court granted a final summary judgment on October 5, 2006.  Appellant filed a motion for new trial on October 31, 2006.  Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due January 3, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1).  However, Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until January 30, 2007.	

	The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely-filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (holding that once extension period has passed, a party can no longer invoke an appellate court’s jurisdiction).

	Therefore, it is the opinion of the court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  March 22, 2007
TITN-2014-4-30 10Q EX 10.4 Description of LTIP






Exhibit 10.4
TITAN MACHINERY INC.
Description of Long-Term Incentive Plan


The Compensation Committee of Titan Machinery Inc. (the “Company”) approved a long-term incentive plan, the “Plan”, in which the each of the chief executive officer and president are entitled to receive a Performance Award for a number of shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the award value, which is one half of a Participant’s base salary at the date of grant, by the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant (the “Performance Awards”).  
The Performance Awards will vest in relation to achievement of threshold and target average after-tax return on equity (“ROE”) levels for the specified three-year performance period, as follows:
	
		
	Level of 
Performance
	Percentage of 
Performance Award Vested

	Below Threshold ROE
	0%

	Threshold ROE 
	25%

	Target ROE 
	100%




ROE performance between the Threshold and Target levels will result in vesting of a pro rata portion of the Performance Award.
Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company’s chief executive officer and president were each granted a Performance Award with a maximum value of 13,797 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 2, 2014.  The Performance Awards will have a performance period beginning with the Company's 2015 fiscal year and ending with the Company's 2017 fiscal year.
Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed May 29, 

2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00628-CR

JASMINE MONIQUE STELLY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1312109

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND

Appellant Jasmine Monique Stelly appeals her conviction for assault of a 

public servant. On original submission, appellant argued that there was insufficient 

evidence in the record to support the court’s costs of $249 reflected in the 

judgment. We agreed and modified the trial court’s judgment to delete the specific 

amount of costs assessed. Stelly v. State, No. 14-12-00628-CR; 2013 WL 645196

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 21, 2013) vacated and remanded, No. PD-
2

385-13; 2014 WL 1512924 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 16, 2014). The Court of 

Criminal Appeals vacated our judgment and remanded in light of its opinion in 

Johnson v. State, 423 S.W.3d 385 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

The judgment includes an assessment of $249 in court costs. The record 

contains a certified, signed bill of costs listing $249 in court costs. We review the 

assessment of court costs on appeal to determine if there is a basis for the costs, not 

to determine whether there was sufficient evidence offered at trial to prove each 

cost. Johnson v. State, 423 S.W.3d at 390. Traditional sufficiency-of-the-evidence 

standards of review do not apply. Id.

Generally, a bill of costs must (1) contain the items of cost, (2) be signed by 

the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment 

for the cost, and (3) be certified. Id. at 392–93; see Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. 

arts. 103.001, 103.006. The record supports the assessment of costs in this case 

because the record contains a bill of costs that contains each item of cost, is signed 

by a representative of the district clerk’s office who is entitled to receive payment 

of the costs, and is certified. See Johnson, 423 S.W.3d at 393. 

The trial court assessed $249 in costs against appellant. The sum of the 

itemized costs in the cost bill is $249. There being no challenge to any specific cost 

or the basis for the assessment of such cost, the bill of costs supports the costs 

assessed in the judgment. Id. at 396. The fact that the bill of costs was not prepared 

until after the court signed the judgment does not defeat the lawfulness of the bill 

of costs. Id. at 394. (“[M]atters pertaining to the imposition of court costs need not 

be brought to the attention of the trial court, including a bill of costs prepared after 

a criminal trial.”).

Pursuant to the disposition on original submission, we modify the trial 

court’s judgment to strike the language reciting “APPEAL WAIVED. NO 
3

PERMISSION TO APPEAL GRANTED.”

On remand, we affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
News United States Air Force
 BLUE: Generation STEMPublished Dec. 23, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                        
                        
                        Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – Air Force TV has released the latest episode of the Air Force's flagship television program, BLUE.
Maintaining a technological edge in defense requires snagging the best and brightest minds for research and development. In this episode, we introduce you to some of the innovative minds working to make the Air Force's technology better, stronger and more efficient today while developing the next generation of innovators for tomorrow.innovation 



stem 



BLUE
No. 87-1117.

#### City of Manassas, Virginia, et al. *v.*United States.

Affirmed on appeal from C. A. .4th Cir.
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 11, 2014. 

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 25) entitled 

‘‘An Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain Federal features of the electric distribution system to the 

South Utah Valley Electric Service District, and for other 

purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DIRECT SPENDING REDUCTION 

2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

3 Paragraph (6)(B) of section 251A of the Balanced 

4 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 

5 U.S.C. 901a) is amended by striking ‘‘and for fiscal year 

6 2023’’ and by inserting ‘‘, for fiscal year 2023, and for fis7 cal year 2024’’. 
2 

•S 25 EAH 

1 SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF REDUCED ANNUAL ADJUST2 MENT OF RETIRED PAY FOR MEMBERS OF 

3 THE ARMED FORCES UNDER THE AGE OF 62 

4 UNDER THE BIPARTISAN BUDGET ACT OF 

5 2013 WHO FIRST BECAME MEMBERS PRIOR TO 

6 JANUARY 1, 2014. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1401a(b)(4) of title 10, 

8 United States Code, as added by section 403(a) of the Bi9 partisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67) and 

10 amended by section 10001 of the Department of Defense Ap11 propriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76), is amended 

12 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(G) MEMBERS COVERED.—This paragraph 

14 applies to a member or former member of an 

15 armed force who first became a member of a uni16 formed service on or after January 1, 2014.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by sub18 section (a) shall take effect on December 1, 2015, imme19 diately after the coming into effect of section 403 of the Bi20 partisan Budget Act of 2013 and the amendments made by 

21 that section. 

22 SEC. 3. TRANSITIONAL FUND FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH 

23 RATE (SGR) REFORM. 

24 Section 1898 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

25 1395iii) is amended— 
3 

•S 25 EAH 

1 (1) by amending the heading to read as follows: 

2 ‘‘TRANSITIONAL FUND FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

3 RATE (SGR) REFORM’’; 

4 (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol5 lows: 

6 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall establish 

7 under this title a Transitional Fund for Sustainable 

8 Growth Rate (SGR) Reform (in this section referred to as 

9 the ‘Fund’) which shall be available to the Secretary to pro10 vide funds to pay for physicians’ services under part B to 

11 supplement the conversion factor under section 1848(d) for 

12 2017 if the conversion factor for 2017 is less than conversion 

13 factor for 2013.’’; 

14 (3) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘during—’’ 

15 and all that follows and inserting ‘‘during or after 

16 2017, $2,300,000,000.’’; and 

17 (4) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘from the 

18 Federal’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘from the 

19 Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust 

20 Fund.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 25 

AMENDMENT
News United States Air Force
 Protect the Power to Enhance Readiness and Resilience During Energy Action MonthPublished Oct. 2, 2018
                        
                        By Melissa Tiedeman
                        
                        
                        Air Force Installation Energy
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                October is Energy Action Month and to Air Force Energy it represents an opportunity to highlight the mission critical importance of energy and water resources and to encourage the smart energy and water use and management for our installations, ground vehicles, and aircraft.
The Air Force theme, “Protect the Power,” calls on Airmen and the larger Air Force community to practice smarter, more efficient energy and water consumption behaviors to enhance readiness and resilience.
“Resilient bases require a reliable, uninterrupted supply of energy to assure mission success for our wings,” said John Henderson, Air Force for Installations, Environment and Energy assistant secretary. “Energy Action Month is a time for us to focus on our responsibility to make the most effective use of our energy and water resources to support our warfighting mission and to enhance readiness.”
“Reducing demand increases resilience and increased resilience leads to enhanced lethality,” added Mark Correll, Air Force for Environment, Safety and Infrastructure deputy assistant secretary. “Airmen and their families can contribute by using energy and water resources efficiently.”
"Being smart about the way we consume aviation fuel is not just about saving money - it's about increasing our combat capability, enabling more training, and decreasing maintenance hours," said Roberto Guerrero, Air Force for Operational Energy deputy assistant secretary. "There are limitless ways to optimize the Air Force, whether it's uncovering inefficiencies through fuel data collection and analysis, introducing new technology, or becoming a more energy focused culture through Airmen education and training."
Whether you implement an aviation fuel efficiency project or implement an energy project at your installation, every effort taken by our dedicated Air Force community contributes to protecting our energy and water resources and helps us to increase resilience and readiness. No matter the size, every Airman can take action to “Protect the Power.”
For more information and downloadable materials for Energy Action Month, visit: www.safie.hq.af.mil/EnergyActionMonth and follow Air Force Energy on Facebook @AirForceEnergy and Twitter @AFEnergy.Aircraft 



Air Force 



Airmen 



energy 



AF 



resources 



readiness 



water 



resilience 



Protect the Power 



installations 



Air Force Energy 



smart energy 



ground vehicles 



efficient energy 



Energy Action Month
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Jan. 26Published Jan. 26, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force NASA and the German Aerospace Center conduct bio-fuels testing and the Air Force has begun the rollout of Tier 2 physical fitness training standards. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith.For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.Related links:- NASA’s flying laboratory comes to Ramstein- Air Force to enhance physical fitness test, standards for select career fieldsATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



Tier 2 PFT 



physical fitness 



NASA 



DRL 



SSgt Jevon Smith 



German Aerospace Center
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MILLS BOONE.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.