alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2730
<SECURITIES>                                        44
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9353
<PP&E>                                           16652
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   25269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7283
<BONDS>                                           1493
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             2510
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       13981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     25269
<SALES>                                          15921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15921
<CGS>                                            14242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1657)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E905]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  TRIBUTE TO THE FRIENDS OF THE ROSEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ON THEIR 20TH 
                              ANNIVERSARY

                                 ______

                          HON. DAVID E. BONIOR

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the Friends of the 
Roseville Public Library. This Saturday, the Friends are celebrating 
their 20th anniversary.
  In 1975, Rosalie Perry and Carol Windorf, along with a handful of 
supporters, founded the group. Today, over 1,300 members provide 
services and support to the people of Roseville and surrounding 
communities through their public library.
  In the past 20 years, the group has taken tremendous pride in their 
library. Without the Friends, many of the services provided would 
simply be nonexistent. Computerized data bases, videos, Books on Tape, 
projectors, and compact discs are all available because of the work of 
the Friends of the Roseville Library. Currently, the group is in the 
process of raising funds to establish a computer center for children. 
In 1995, the Roseville library continues to house a large selection of 
books, magazines, and other reading materials, and because of the 
Friends' efforts, it is also preparing for the 21st century.
  The people of Roseville are fortunate to have the Friends working to 
improve their library and I am looking forward to celebrating their 
20th anniversary when I return to Michigan this weekend. I urge my 
colleagues to join me in wishing the Friends of the Roseville Public 
Library many more years of success.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2169 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2169

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax 
              regarding the taxation of distilled spirits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2014

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax 
              regarding the taxation of distilled spirits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Distillery Excise Tax Reform Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. REDUCED RATE OF TAX ON CERTAIN DISTILLED SPIRITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5001 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to imposition, rate, and attachment of tax on distilled 
spirits) is amended by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d) 
and by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Reduced Rate.--In the case of a distilled spirits producer, 
the otherwise applicable tax rate under subsection (a)(1) on the first 
100,000 of proof gallons of distilled spirits produced by such producer 
during the calendar year in the United States shall be $2.70 per proof 
gallon.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 7652(f)(2) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``section 5001(a)'' and 
inserting ``sections 5001(a)(1) and 5001(c)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to distilled spirits produced in calendar years beginning after 
December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
#### IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY F. DEMARCO, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

September 9, 1985.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Office of Attorney Ethics having petitioned the Supreme Court for an order temporarily suspending Anthony F. DeMar-co of Little Falls from the practice of law pursuant to *R.*1:20 — 5(b), for appropriate protective action on said attorney’s files, records, practice and trust assets pursuant to *R.*1:20-11(c) and for restraints on the disbursal of funds from all bank accounts maintained pursuant to *R.*1:21-6, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Anthony F. DeMarco be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such emergent protective action as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets wherever situate pursuant to *R.*1:20-11(c); and it is further

ORDERED that all funds presently existing in any New Jersey banking institution including but not limited to the Broadway Bank and Trust Company, 68 Main Street, Little Falls, New Jersey 07424, trust account numbers 03-09836-5 and 3093548 and business account number 3093521, maintained by Anthony F. DeMarco, pursuant to *R.*1:21-6, relating to his law practice shall not be disbursed except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Anthony F. DeMarco show cause before this Court on September 24th, 1985 at 2:00 P.M. in the Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey why the temporary suspension and restraints herein should *484not continue pending final disposition of any complaints against him and until further order of the Court and further (1) why the Office of Attorney Ethics should not be directed to take further protective action pursuant to *R.*l:20-ll(c) to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets wherever situate and (2) why the funds restrained from disbursement by this Order should not be transmitted by the banks which are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust fund pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent may move prior to the return date of this Order to Show Cause on an application for good cause shown for modification of this order or the restraints contained herein; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his desig-nee, shall present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Anthony F. DeMarco be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600281

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

ANTHONY D. DELAGARZA

Lance Corporal (E-3), United States Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Michael D. Zimmerman, USMC.

For Appellant: Major Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 29 September 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, RUGH and HUTCHISON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
## 1995 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
8-16-1995 

# I n Re: Leon M o se r
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 95-9005

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1995

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1995 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" I n Re: L e on M os e r " (1995). 1995 D e cisio n s . P ape r 226. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1995/226

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 95-9005

___________
In Re: Leon Moser

___________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

August 15, 1995 Before: MANSMANN, COWEN and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges . (E.D.PA Civil 95-cv-05175)

___________ (Filed: August 16, l995) OPINION OF THE COURT

__________

Per Curiam
. We have before us an appeal purporting to challenge the August 16, 1995 order of the district court "granting `next friend' status and a competency hearing and finding no deliberate delay." Respondents' Memorandum of Appeal. The State does not offer a basis for the exercise of our appellate jurisdiction to hear this interlocutory matter nor does it ask us to exercise our mandamus authority under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). Unlike the appeal from the grant of a stay of execution on which we had alternate grounds of jurisdiction, specifically 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) and mandamus jurisdiction under the All Writs Act given the extraordinary circumstances of the grant of a

## stay, we find that we do not have jurisdiction in the absence of

a certification by the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1292(b). It is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5732]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS

                                 ______

                   A CHANCE FOR JUSTICE IN EAST TIMOR

 Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, on January 12 of this year, the 
Indonesian military tortured and murdered six unarmed civilians in 
Liquisa, near Dili, in East Timor.
  The Indonesian Army Chief of Staff, while reportedly admitting 
``procedural violations,'' claimed the victims were supporters of the 
guerrillas. However, the National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia, 
which released a scathing report on March 2, accused the military of 
``unlawful'' killings of innocent civilians.
  As anyone who follows events in East Timor knows, the Liquisa 
shootings were not an isolated incident. They were part of a pattern of 
political violence on the island in which Indonesian troops have been 
implicated for decades.
  However, the fact that the National Human Rights Commission published 
such a conscientious report is encouraging. The Indonesian Government 
now has two choices.
  One choice is to repeat its mistakes after the November 1991 Dili 
massacre. Many here will recall how back then, the unarmed 
demonstrators were sentenced to long prison terms, while a handful of 
lower ranking soldiers who fired the deadly shots went to jail for a 
few months and the officers who gave the orders and tried to cover up 
the crime went scot free.
  The other choice is to take responsibility, and use this opportunity 
to punish severely all those implicated in these crimes, and by doing 
so deter others from committing such atrocities in the future. Only 
when the impunity ends will the abuse of human rights end.
  Let us hope that the Indonesian Government seizes this opportunity to 
demonstrate that no one is above the law, because it is long overdue in 
a country that seeks to be accepted as a respectable world 
power.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000771677
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-B LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         427,858
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               428,258
<PP&E>                                       4,110,288
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,526,110)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,012,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,862
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,723,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,012,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,197
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                141,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            141,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   141,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                      21.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    21.24


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  Encompass  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 30, 2006               ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE I. HANDLER
                                 --------------------------
                                 Leslie I. Handler, President
Order entered November 20 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00856
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C .S.B AND R.D.B, CHILDREN On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 11
- 15158



### O RDER In an order dated October 8, 2014, we ordered Shantel Beheler, Official Court Reporter for the 255th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to file by October 24, 2014, either the reporter’s record or written verification that ap pellant has not paid for the record. As of today’s date, Shantel Beheler has not responded. Accordingly, we again ORDER Shantel Beheler to file, by DECEMBER 5, 2014 , either the reporter’s record or written verification that appellant has not paid for th e record. If the Court does not receive either the reporter’s record or the required written verification of no payment, we will utilize the remedies available to obtain the reporter’s record, which may include ordering Shantel Beheler not sit as a court reporter until she complies with this order. We caution appellant that if the Court receives written verification of no payment, we will order the appeal submitted with out the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).We DIRECT the Clerk of this Cou rt to send a copy of this order by electronic

transmission to T he Honorable Lori Hockett, Presiding Judge of the 255th Judicial District Court, Shantel Beheler, and counsel for all parties.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
No. 87-1205.

#### Fleisher *v.*City of Signal Hill, California, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 30, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 30, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0253. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al v. CHARVETTE E. MONROE, AS 

EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARGIE G. EVANS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2018RCSC01222
News United States Air Force
 AF selects 534 for promotion to colonel, lieutenant colonel, majorPublished Jan. 27, 2017
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 534 active-duty officers for promotion as a result the 2016A Medical and Dental Corps central selection boards for colonel, lieutenant colonel and major.
The boards selected 76 lieutenant colonels for promotion to colonel, 159 majors for promotion to lieutenant colonel and 299 captains for promotion to major.
To view the lists, go to the Air Force Portal and selection the promotion link. Promotion lists have also posted to myPers. To view the lists, select “Active Duty Officer” from the drop down menu, search “Promotions Home” and scroll down to the promotion select lists.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.AFPC 



promotion 



officers 



force management 



JB San Antonio-Randolph
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (256)
<INVENTORY>                                     17,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,079
<PP&E>                                         164,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,660
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,017
<SALES>                                         31,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,275
<CGS>                                           26,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    275
<INCOME-TAX>                                        87
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,414)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
</FN>
        

</TABLE>