alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 99.9

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Lopez, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tembec
Inc. (the Company) , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

| | a. | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended September 29, 2012 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | b. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    

Date: December 17, 2012

By:

/s/James
LopezName: James LopezTitle: President and
Chief ExecutiveOfficer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
No. 12,263.

#### The Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company *v.*Indianapolis and Westfield Gravel Road Company.

Filed Dec. 30, 1885.

From the Boone Circuit Court.

*W. Irvin*and *C. S. Wesner,*for appellant.

*R. R. Stephenson*and *T. E. Boyd,*for appellee.

Howk, J.

No question was properly saved by the appellant in the record of this cause, and its counsel have presented no question for our decision. On the 21st day of July, 1885, appellant’s counsel asked and obtained from this court an extension of thirty days in which to file their brief of this cause. Since the expiration of the time allowed more than four months have elapsed, and counsel have not filed their brief. In this state of the case this appeal must be and is dismissed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2355 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2355

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain 
 compensation received by public safety officers and their dependents 
                           from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2014

  Ms. Ayotte introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain 
 compensation received by public safety officers and their dependents 
                           from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Don't Tax Our Fallen Public Safety 
Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of 
paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and 
inserting ``; and'', and by inserting after paragraph (5) the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(6) amounts received pursuant to--
                    ``(A) section 1201 of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
                Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796); or
                    ``(B) a program established under the laws of any 
                State which provides monetary compensation for 
                surviving dependents of a public safety officer who has 
                died as the direct and proximate result of a personal 
                injury sustained in the line of duty.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 TRICARE continues to expand coveragePublished Dec. 6, 2016
                        
                        By TRICARE Staff
                        
                        
                        TRICARE
                **FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Effective in early December, TRICARE will expand coverage to include the care and treatment of beneficiaries requiring an auditory osseointegrated implant (AOI) to non-active-duty family members, and we will also cover the services and supplies needed to diagnose and treat illness or injury of the urinary system.
AOI is a prosthetic device implanted in the skull to transmit sounds to the inner ear. They are used when needed for significant hearing conditions resulting from trauma, birth defects or disease.
Injuries to the urinary system can include blunt force, e.g., most commonly motor vehicle crashes, falls, or sports injuries or a penetrating force, e.g., most commonly gunshot or stab wounds, or surgery. Injuries to the urinary tract often occur together with injuries to other organs, especially abdominal organs. Illnesses can include bladder disease or cancer, urinary tract infections, and chronic kidney disease.
These additions to coverage are on the heels of our recently expanded preventive services and care for congestive heart failure under the TRICARE cardiac rehabilitation benefit.
For questions about all covered services, visit the TRICARE website. To learn how a benefit becomes covered, click here.health care 



coverage 



TRICARE
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

                Inconnection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DigitalAngel Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2002(the "Periodic Report"), I, Randolph K. Geissler, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 8, 2002 |   | /s/ Randolph K. Geissler  |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                  |   | Randolph K. Geissler      |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer   |
|                  |   | Digital Angel Corporation |

 

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 4Published Aug. 4, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, senior leaders release new priorities, F.E. Warren AFB Airmen launch a Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic Missile and the Secretary of the Air Force discusses space funding at an Air Force Association dinner. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler.For previous episodes, click**here**for the Air Force TV page.-Senior Leaders priorities-ICBM launch from Vandenberg AFB- SecAF speaks at AFA dinnerATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



SecAF 



space 



Minuteman III 



ICBM 



missile 



launch 



A1C Cory Kuttler 



Vandenberg AFB 



California 



Senior Leaders
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) of Garrison Capital Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Tansey, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Joseph Tansey Joseph Tansey Chief Executive Officer March 4, 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our reports dated January 22, 2001, in Amendment No. 5 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-49010) and related Prospectus of Chorum
Technologies Inc. for the registration of 8,000,000 shares of its common stock.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
January 31, 2001
#### STATE v. KEEL

No. 134A93-9

Case below: Edgecombe County Superior Court

Motion by Attorney General to lift stay of execution denied 19 July 2001.
News United States Air Force
 AF senior leaders visit ArcticPublished Sept. 8, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force senior leaders from Headquarters Air Force and major commands will visit multiple locations in the Arctic region Sept. 7-13, 2017, to better understand the challenges of operating in the region. 
The visit is especially important due to changes in the Arctic’s climate and environment, which have increased activity in the area. 
“Our job as Air Force leaders is to ensure we’re ready to counter threats when and where they arise, and that means preparing to operate in all environments,” said Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Stephen Wilson. “This is an opportunity for us to gain first-hand understanding of this challenging environment and what we need to be successful.” 
This visit to locations in Alaska, Canada and Greenland is part of the Air Force’s effort to develop an Arctic strategy nested under the Department of Defense objectives. DoD’s objectives are to prevent and deter conflict in the Arctic and prepare to respond to a wide range of challenges and contingencies, with an ultimate goal of a secure and stable region where U.S. national interests are safeguarded and nations work together to address challenges. 
“The Arctic is key strategic terrain...Russia is taking aggressive steps to increase its presence there,” said Secretary of Defense James Mattis in a written statement to Congress. “I believe that our interests and the security of the Arctic would benefit from increasing the focus of the Department of Defense on this region.” 
In Alaska, leaders will observe training, missile defense and cold weather operations as well as domain awareness capabilities and limitations. In Canada, meetings will focus on Canadian partnership, North American Aerospace Defense Command and early warning systems. The trip’s final stop in Greenland will provide leaders with an opportunity to observe airfield and port operations, infrastructure, skiway and ice sheet changes and discuss challenges, strategy and partnerships with the Danish Joint Arctic Command. 
The U.S. has a vital Arctic neighbor and partner in Canada. Other key allies and partners in the Arctic include Norway, Iceland, Denmark, all NATO allies, and NATO’s Enhanced Opportunity Partners, Sweden and Finland. These nations work together in numerous forums to address shared regional concerns (e.g., fisheries management, shipping safety, scientific research).NATO 



Arctic region 



Canada 



Alaska 



Allies 



Danish Joint Arctic Command 



stability 



port operations 



infrastructure 



SecAF 



CSAF 



VCSAF 



SecDEF
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF ELMER'S RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND MARCH 31, 1996, AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR
EACH OF THE THREE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANICIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,519,194
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      192,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        212,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,053,201
<PP&E>                                          11,231,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,422,227)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,080,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,389,421
<BONDS>                                          3,471,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,600,260
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,513,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,080,152
<SALES>                                          7,675,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,007,450
<CGS>                                            4,763,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,524,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    333,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                       113,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                219,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       219,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.15
                                                          

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.5

                         Consent of Proposed Director

     The undersigned hereby consents to serve as a director of Aviation Group,
Inc. if the arrangement contemplated by the Arrangement Agreement dated as of
May 3, 2000 by and among Aviation Group, Inc., Aviation Group Canada Ltd. and
travelbyus.com Ltd. is consummated, and to be named as a potential director of
Aviation Group, Inc. in the Form S-4 Registration Statement for the arrangement
transaction.

                                    By:    /s/ ALAN THOMPSON
                                           -----------------
                                    Name:  Alan Thompson
                                    Date:  May 9, 2000
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5702-S5703]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             SUPREME COURT DECISION STRIKES BIPARTISAN LAW

  Mr. KOHL. Mr. President, I am quite disappointed and even puzzled 
today by the Supreme Court's decision in the United States versus Lopez 
case. Usually, the courts speak with one voice, but today the majority 
of the court spoke for several separate opinions.
  By a slim 5 to 4 margin, the court struck down the bipartisan Gun-
Free School Zones Act, a law that prohibits possession of firearms 
within 1,000 feet of a school.
  In my judgment, this is a classic example of judicial activism, and 
it ignores the safety of our American children.
  I will briefly say something about the facts that the court today 
ignored. Each day in our country more than 100,000 students bring guns 
into our schools. One-fifth of urban high school students have been 
threatened with firearms, and several hundred thousand schoolchildren 
are victims of violent crimes in or near their schools every year. 
Moreover, the problem of youth violence is rapidly escalating. In 1984, 
a total of 1,134 juveniles were arrested for murder; by 1993, that 
figure had more than doubled. According to the Justice Department, the 
vast majority 
[[Page S5703]] of these murders were committed with firearms and many 
with handguns.
  Democrats and Republicans in Congress, together, tried to do 
something about this disturbing trend when we enacted the gun-free 
school zones legislation in 1990. Today, a slim majority of the court 
has shot Congress down, and in so doing, put America's children at 
greater risk.
  Now, because we reenacted and perfected the Gun-Free School Act last 
year as part of the crime bill, the current law may still be 
constitutional. Indeed, we may yet be able to ensure the 
constitutionality of the law with a technical amendment, and I plan to 
introduce a bill to do that next week.
  Broadly interpreted, however, the reasoning of the majority in this 
case could have far-reaching consequences that may undermine a variety 
of crucial Federal laws, like the Drug-Free School Zones Act on which 
the Gun-Free School Zones Act was based, or the bans on cop-killer 
bullets, or our Federal wetlands laws, and many of our civil rights 
statutes.
  Mr. President, I agree with the strong dissent by Judge Souter, 
joined by Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, and Breyer, who labeled this 
ruling today by the Supreme Court a step backward.
  I again want to express my disappointment with today's decision.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on
    Form 10-Q for the
    period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
    periods indicated.                                                                                                          

|                                |  |                                
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                               
|/s/ Paul A. Toback              |  | /s/ Carl J. Landeck            
|                                |  |                                
|Name: Paul A. Toback            |  | Name: Carl J. Landeck          
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer |  | Title:  Chief Financial Officer