**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6628** 

CHRISTOPHER WEST , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kerhsaw State Prison; WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS, in her individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JERRY WASHINGTON, in his individual and offi cial capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; MAJOR DARREN SEWARD, in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; CAPTAIN DANIEL DUBOSE, in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kerhsaw State Prison; LIEUTENANT CLAUDE POWELL, in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; SERGEANT KRISTOPHER SWEET, in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; CORPORAL JEREMY TARLTON, in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; OFFICER LAWRENCE TAYLOR, in his individual and official capacity as corrections employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; NURSE LUANNE MUNGO, in her individual and official capacity as correct ions employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison , Defendants

- Appellees

.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 5:13

- cv - 00981

- DCN )

Submitted : December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Christopher West, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Christopher West appeals the district court ’ s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( 2012 ). The magistrate judge recommended
that relief be denied and advised West that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation

. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v.
Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see Massey v. Ojaniit , 759 F.3d 343, 352 (4th Cir. 2014)

. West has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED