alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Engle *v.*Bonneau.

An execution may be returned in less than sixty days, and whenever returned unsatisfied, the creditor may proceed under section 292 of the code, without regard to the period it was in the sheriff’s hands.

If the debtor show any fraud or collusion in omitting to levy on property, the court will take care the fraud is not effectuated.

The execution must be actually returned by the sheriff, before the supplementary proceeding can be commenced.

No costs to a defendant on this proceeding, on his procuring it to be dismissed, without an examination.

Dec. 27, 1849.

The defendant appeared pursuant to an order of one of the justices of the court, issued upon a proceeding supplementary to the return of an execution unsatisfied. The affidavit on which the order was obtained, stated that the sheriff had returned the execution. It was shown, however, that it had not been filed when the order was made. On this and several other grounds, the defendant moved to dismiss the proceedings with costs.

*Western*and Coren, for the plaintiff.

*B. L. Billinge,*for the defendant.

Sandford, J.

It is objected that a party cannot proceed under section *292*of the code, until after the expiration of the sixty days during which an execution may run; although the execution be in fact returned unsatisfied and filed. This is insisted in analogy to the established practice on creditor’s bills in the late court of chancery. (3 Paige, 311.)

The code is consistent with the course pursued by the plaintiff here, who had his execution returned in thirty days after it was issued. I have advised with my associates, and my conclusion, I am authorized to say, is theirs also. We desire to establish a uniform practice on the subject, and we find that this course is sanctioned, both in the supreme court and the common pleas in this city. For the decisions in the supreme court we refer to 1 Code Reporter, 107, note.

*680It may, therefore, be deemed the established practice in this court, that whenever an execution has been regularly issued and returned unsatisfied, the creditor may proceed against the judgment debtor’s things in action, under section 292 of the code; without regard to the time during which the execution was in the hands of the sheriff. If collusion or fraud in making the return, or in omitting to levy upon property, be shown, the court will take care that the proceeding shall not be made an instrument to carry the fraud into effect.

The averment as to things in action, &c., expected to be reached by this examination, is one required by the practice of the court. It is not a statutory provision, and it may now be supplied by a supplementary affidavit.

There is, however, a fatal defect in the plaintiff’s proceedings, in the fact that the execution was not actually returned, until several days after the order for the defendant’s examination was made.

The order must be discharged, but without costs. The 301st section does not give the defendant costs in these cases, unless he has been examined.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: First
    Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian
    and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities
    Administrator .

    Dated:   March 29, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of NOVAGOLD
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended November 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Ottewell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 25, 2019 |  | By: /s/ David A. Ottewell
|------------------- |  | -------------------------
|                    |  | David A. Ottewell        
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
BRIAN QUINN
Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG
Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

June 22, 2017

Kathryn H. Gurley
District Attorney
287th Judicial District
P.O. Box 729 Friona, TX 79035

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Julie Goen Panger
THE KIECHLER LAW FIRM PLLC
619 Broadway Lubbock, TX 79401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Numbers: 07-16-00465-CR, 07-16-00466-CR, 07-16-00467-CR,
07-16-00468-CR
Trial Court Case Number: 2900

Style: Alexander Eli Martinez v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The State's brief was filed on Wednesday, June 21, 2017.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
Order filed, February 20, 2018

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 17

- 00915

- CV
JORY ODOM AND SECURATECH SOLUTIONS, INC. , Appellant

V.

SOUTHCROSS SECURIT Y, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 2015

- 14026



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due January 2, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.1. On January 10, 2018 , this court ordered the cou rt reporter to file the record within 30 days . The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order

.No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The

trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. Se e Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If the reporter does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Non-deployable review / Energy Action MonthPublished Oct. 5, 2018
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Angelo Rosario
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)**– On this look Around the Air Force, the Air Force is finalizing details on how to determine retention for non-deployable Airmen, October is Energy Action Month, and the Air Force expands use of express licensing. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Angelo Rosario. 
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **Air Force to finalize review process for non-deployable Airmen**
- **Retention determinations for non-deployable service members**
- **Protect the power to enhance readiness and resilience during Energy Action Month**
- **Air Force expands use of express licensing**
- **Jordanian officer aces aircraft fuel systems course**Texas 



retention 



Jordan 



Sheppard AFB 



Energy Action Month 



Deploy 



Tech 



Around the Air Force 



Technical Training 



Featured Videos 



AF Reports 



AirForce TV 



A1C Angelo Rosario 



Express Licensing 



ATAF 



deployment 



Tech School
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1175

In re: RONALD ONEAL VALENTINE.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:08-hc-02003-FL) Submitted: March 19, 2008 Decided: May 5, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Oneal Valentine, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronald Oneal Valentine petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2008 

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Alabama AircraftIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(a) the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2008 

 

/s/ Randall C. Shealy
Randall C. ShealySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             794
<SECURITIES>                                     1,423
<RECEIVABLES>                                      458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,292
<PP&E>                                           1,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                     866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,018
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,679
<SALES>                                          3,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,984
<CGS>                                            2,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    246
<INCOME-TAX>                                       118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                128
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       126
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .035
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .034
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1
       
<S>                        <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1995                     
<CASH>                                          654
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                245172
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                  348838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             625828    
<PP&E>                                      1544053
<DEPRECIATION>                              1148354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1335381    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        228832
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                       3350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0                    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1335381
<SALES>                                      256323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             256323 
<CGS>                                        175091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                308336  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (52013)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                (19000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (33013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.01)                              
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Air Force seeks 2017 NPSA nomineesPublished May 16, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alexx Pons
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force officials are currently accepting submissions for the 2017 National Public Service Award.
The American Society for Public Administration and the National Academy of Public Administration established the award to honor individuals whose outstanding contributions and accomplishments allow them to be viewed as models of public service in and out of the work environment. 
This award is open to both military and Department of Defense civilian employees. A committee from ASPA and NAPA will review nominations and select up to five award recipients who have spent a significant portion of their career as public service practitioners at the federal, state, local or international levels of government, or in nonprofit organizations that provided direct public service. NPSA winners will be those who have, on a sustained basis, done some or all of the following:
-Made a profound difference to improve service to the public
-Been willing to take risks to achieve change
-Fostered a more democratic society
-Served as a champion of social equity
-Changed the way a governmental organization operates so that it better achieves its goals
-Achieved substantial savings in government operations
-Developed a cadre of other government leaders
-Contributed to the communities in which they live
Those considering nomination or nominating another are highly encouraged to review past winners and submit nominees who have similar credentials. For a full description of the award or to review information on previous winners visit the **American Society for Public Administration** website.
Organizations and base-level personnel must contact their major commands, combatant commands, field operating agencies, direct reporting units or MAJCOM-equivalent agency for applicable suspense date and additional information regarding nomination procedures. Each MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA and DRU may submit one nomination. All nomination packages are due to the Air Force Personnel Center by Aug. 4, 2017.
Specific eligibility and application procedures are available via myPers. Select “any” from the dropdown menu and search “NPSA.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to **myPers**. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instruction on the **Air Force Personnel Center** website.Air Force 



AETC 



AF 



Air Force Personnel Center 



award 



Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph 



public service 



National Public Service Award 



Air Force Base 



government 



JB San Antonio-Randolph 



Air Education and Training Center 



NPSA 



American Society for Public Administration 



National Academy of Public Administration 



AFPC
#### BUDD LEPMAN v. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION.

July 23, 1985.

Motions to dismiss appeals granted.
#### MARIA SEGALL v. EST, AN EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41093

GARY CHAFFIN

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROWAN COMPANIES, INCORPORATED

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(No. 1:00-CV-206)

July 22, 2002

Before Judges WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (10-108)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

September 8, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward K. Fein, Patent Counsel, Johnson Space Center, Mail Code AL, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058, (281) 483-4871; (281) 483-6936 [Facsimile].

NASA Case No. MSC-24238-1: Microwave Tissue Welding for Wound Closure.

Dated: September 1, 2010.

Richard W. Sherman,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-22389 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P