alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN: 0648-XY68

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of a public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Observer Advisory Committee (OAC) will meet at the Anchorage Hilton Hotel, September 28-29, 2010.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 28-29, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Hilton Hotel, 500 W. 3rd Avenue, Anchorage, AK.

*Council address*: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicole Kimball, Council staff; telephone: (907) 271-2809.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The primary purpose of the meeting is to review the public review draft analysis to establish a new program for observer procurement and deployment in the North Pacific Groundfish Observer Program (i.e., restructuring). The committee will also receive a report on an electronic monitoring study in the commercial halibut fishery. The agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at *http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/​npfmc/​*

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: August 30, 2010.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-22009 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                           12,170 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                      0    
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 12,170 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   12,170 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         2,328,737 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                   (6,347,261)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     12,170 
<SALES>                            0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   0    
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                123,823 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              109,990 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (233,813)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (133,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (133,124)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (128)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (128)

        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a), PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, MarcParent, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-Fof CAE Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The issuer’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

(a)               designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)              designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsfor external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;

(c)               evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)              disclosed in this report any change in theissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.     The issuer’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

                                                                                                        

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5558]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, at the hour of 1 p.m., it will be the 
intention of the majority leader to proceed to the consideration of 
H.R. 956, the product liability bill. For the further information of 
all Senators, the Senate will begin the product liability bill at that 
point but no votes will occur before 3 p.m. on Monday.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that:



|                        |  | /s/RONALD E. RAGLANDRonald E. Ragland
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/DAVID L. MORASHDavid L. Morash
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer  
|Date: November 12, 2002 |  |                                                                           

---

QuickLinks
#### G.P.M. v. S.M.R.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 19, 2014

s1112 

# Order

Clerk November 19, 2014

149370

BRUCE WHITMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 149370

COA: 294703

Genesee CC: 08

- 087993

- CL

CITY OF BURTON and CHARLES SMILEY,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A pril 24, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Wurtz v

Beecher Metropolitan District , 495 Mich 242 (2014). We also take this opportunity, as

suggested by the Court of Appeals dissent, Whitman v City of Burton , 305 Mich App 16,

45 n 2 (2014), to clarify that reports given because the employee is req uested to

participate in an investigation by a public body are still considered protected activity.

See MCL 15.362; Chandler v Dowell Schlumberger Inc , 456 Mich 395, 399 (1998). Any

contrary suggestion in our earlier opinion in this case, Whitman v City of Burton , 493

Mich 303, 313 (2013), is VACATED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         734,789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,105,812
<PP&E>                                      29,926,084
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,012,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,019,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,804,578
<BONDS>                                     33,288,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,785,477)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,019,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,081,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,761,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               207,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             724,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,085
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>5.03(b)(20)

EPS PRIMARY - INCOME PER CLASS A UNIT
EPS DILUTED - INCOME PER CLASS B UNIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Laser Guided Bombs enhance Afghan Air Force Strike CapabilityPublished May 21, 2018
                        
                        By 1st Lt. Erin Recanzone
                        
                        
                        Train Advise Assist Command
                **KABUL AIR WING, Afghanistan --**
                Since March 22, 2018, the Afghan Air Force has both introduced and increased the use of precision guided munitions in southern Afghanistan.“The recent addition of laser-guided bomb strike capability is huge for the Afghan Air Force,” said Lt. Col. Justin Williams, 438th Air Expeditionary Advisor Squadron commander. “Afghanistan did not have it last fighting season, and we are already seeing the crippling psychological effect it is having on the enemies of Afghanistan this season.”Since the implementation of Laser Guided Bombs, nearly 96 percent of strikes have been successful and have led to a 30 percent increase in ground force commander desired effects on the battlefield and a greater overall mission success.The capability, which consists of conventional bombs enabled with laser guidance kits, is almost entirely Afghan.“The bombs are built by Afghan ammunitions specialists and loaded onto Afghan planes by Afghan maintainers,” Williams said. “This is one example of how the Afghan Air Force is assuming ownership across the board.” As of May 11, 2018, A-29 Super Tucano pilots have supported approximately 30 Afghan ground missions with this technology, successfully dropping over 50 laser guided bombs on enemy targets.“The Taliban like to hide in towns and places where civilians are,” said an Afghan Air Force A-29 pilot. “The Laser Guided Bomb lets me strike those places without hurting the local people.”   Williams echoed the Afghan pilot’s comments.“Using laser-guided technology, the Afghan Air Force pilots are able to strike with extreme precision, limiting civilian casualties while still having a greater, more profound effect on the battlefield,” Williamss aid.Afghan Air Force members are constantly working with their train, advise and assist coalition partners to develop new capabilities that create a more professional, capable and sustainable Afghan Air Force.The implementation of laser-guided bombs comes just two years after the Afghan Air Force gained air strike capabilities in the A-29 and is part of an overall effort to modernize the Afghan Air Force and give it a lethal advantage over the enemy.Air Force 



technology 



AF 



Afghan air force 



A-29 Super Tucano 



air superiority 



Kabul Air Wing 



Kabul AW 



sustainable 



laser guided bombs 



438th Air Expeditionary Advisor Squadron 



438th AEAS 



air wing 



TAAC-Air 



AAF 



A-29 



LGB 



GBU 



Laser Guided Bomb 



Precision strike 



Resolute Support 



438 AEW 



438 Air Expeditionary Wing 



Train Advice Assist 



AFCENT 



centcom 



Afghanistan
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# SecAF selects AFCENT Airman for commissioning program

              - Published  Dec. 21, 2017
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Trevor Rhynes                                                    
              - AFCENT Public Affairs

**AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar (AFNS) --  **
Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson notified a U.S. Air Forces Central Command Airman of his selection for the Senior Leader Enlisted Commissioning Program-Active Duty Scholarship, Dec. 20, 2017.

The commissioning program allows Air Force senior leadership to select exceptionally performing enlisted members for commissioning through Officer Training School. Staff Sgt. Anthony Segarra, AFCENT innovations solutions manager, was Wilson’s selection.

Segarra said Wilson told him he had outstanding recommendations and wanted to personally notify him of his selection.

“I am not at all surprised that Segarra was selected by the SecAF for SLECP-A,” said Lt. Col. Susan Loveland, AFCENT chief of innovations and integrations. “He's smart, hard working and dedicated; a core driver of AFCENT process improvement and agile development. His experience and personality are exactly right for leading tomorrow's Airmen to build the culture necessary for ‘New-New’ innovations.”

This was Segarra’s second time applying for this commissioning program. He plans to attend the University of South Carolina and complete his degree in physics.  

“It's overwhelming right now thinking about going back to school full time after seven years, but I'm ecstatic, relieved and honored to be afforded the opportunity by Secretary Wilson,” Segarra said. “An eighth grade teacher told me once I was the epitome of an all-or-nothing type person, and this has proven to hold true. Since joining, I've given everything to the Air Force and haven't been able to focus on my schooling as a result. This program will really allow me to shift my full focus toward schooling, and then back to the Air Force afterwards. It's really a dream scenario come true.”

officereducationNCOCommissionOfficer Training SchoolUniversity of South CarolinaUS Air Forces Central CommandSenior Leader Enlisted Commissioning Program Active DutySLECP-Ainnovations solutionsAFCENT
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Joseph F. Fisher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.


February 26, 2006           /s/  JOSEPH F. FISHER
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            By: Joseph F. Fisher
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### GEORGE HENRY v. WALTER SCIBEK.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SAMUEL R. CONE, II

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2585

LT Case No. 2 013

- CF

- 00 0767

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed December 1 3, 2022

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Marion County

, Anthony M. Tatti , Judge.

Samuel R. Cone, I I , Lake City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS

, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 Nos.333-111532 and 333-126186) of Natural Resource Partners L.P. and in the related Prospectus of ourreports dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NaturalResource Partners L.P., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofNatural Resource Partners L.P., and the consolidated balance sheet of NRP (GP) LP (Exhibit 99.1)included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.ERNST & YOUNG LLPHouston, Texas
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of Garrison Capital Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian Chase, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Brian Chase



Brian ChaseChief Financial OfficerMarch 2, 2016
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

March 16, 2017 Via EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ SARAH   NEWELL                               |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Sarah   Newell                                        |
|   |   | Vice   President                                      |
|   |   | The   Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,          |
|   |   | N.A.,   as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I |

 

----