alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 21 - 0546

_________________ PATRICK STEVEN BRYAN, II,

Petitioner, v. JESSE SLAUGHTER, Cas cade County Sheriff,

Respondent. O R D E R

_________________ Patrick Steven Bryan II petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to relieve him from what he contends is an unlawful order of the Eighth Judicial District Court holding him on $10,000 bail in Cascade County Cause No. CDC - 21 - 660 . As Bryan is being held pre -trial in the Cas cade C ounty Detention Center, we have revised the caption of the case to name only the person having custody. See § 46 - 22 - 205 (1), MCA. Bryan argues that the State did not present sufficient evidence to justify the imposition of bai l , that he is indigent, and that the failure to release him under the circumstances presented unlawfully restrains him of liberty in violation of his constitutional rights . Having reviewed the petition and attachments, the C ourt deems it advisable to obtain a response. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Attorney General, the Cas cade County Attorney, or both, are granted twenty days from the date of this Order within which to file a response to the petition. The C l erk of this Court is directed to give notic e of this Order to the Attorney General, to all counsel of record in Cas cade County Cause No. CDC - 21 - 0660, and to the Hon. John Kutzman, presiding judge .

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0546
News United States Air Force
 AF promotes 2,001 via September in-system supplemental processPublished Sept. 14, 2017
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force selected 2,001 enlisted Airmen for promotionSept. 14, 2017, via the in-system supplemental promotion process. 
The full list is available on the Enlisted Promotions page of the Air Force Personnel Center’s public website. Click the “Supplemental Promotion Selects” button on the right side of the page.

For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.force management 



promotion 



AFPC 



AETC 



Supplemental promotion 



enlisted promotion 



JB San Antonio 



Air Force 



USAF
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,898
<INVENTORY>                                    151,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,370
<PP&E>                                         266,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,275
<BONDS>                                        276,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   663,145
<SALES>                                        796,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               796,093
<CGS>                                          264,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  739,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
        

</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS OF JOSEPH GUARINO.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2723 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify homeless youth 

and veterans who are full-time students for purposes of the low income 

housing tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. FRANKEN (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mrs. MURRAY, and Ms. COLLINS) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify 

homeless youth and veterans who are full-time students 

for purposes of the low income housing tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing for Homeless 

5 Students Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2723 IS

1 SEC. 2. HOMELESS YOUTH AND VETERANS WHO ARE FULL2 TIME STUDENTS QUALIFIED FOR PURPOSES 

3 OF THE LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 42(i)(3)(D) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by re6 designating subclauses (II) and (III) as subclauses (IV) 

7 and (V), respectively, and by inserting after subclause (I) 

8 the following new subclauses: 

9 ‘‘(II) a full-time student who, 

10 during any portion of the 5-year pe11 riod ending with the commencement 

12 of such individual’s continuous occu13 pation of any low-income unit or 

14 units, was an individual described in 

15 section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento 

16 Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 11434a), 

18 ‘‘(III) a full-time student who, 

19 during any portion of the 5-year pe20 riod ending with the commencement 

21 of such individual’s continuous occu22 pation of any low-income unit or 

23 units, was an individual described in 

24 section 2002(1) of title 38, United 

25 States Code,’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2723 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to determinations made before, 

3 on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SCWC-14-0000787 and SCWC-14-0000848 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STEVEN L. FISHER, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs. STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000787 and CAAP-14-0000848; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0002 (CR. NO. 6561)) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Perkins, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Steven L. Fisher’s, application for writ of certiorari filed on September 14, 2015, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 27, 2015. Steven L. Fisher petitioner pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Richard K. Perkins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000787 27-OCT-2015 11:56 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,304,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,623,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (415,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,852,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,452,397
<PP&E>                                      16,144,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,572,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,864,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,585,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,710
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,277,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,864,139
<SALES>                                     21,204,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,204,467
<CGS>                                        9,813,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,813,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,285,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,009,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (342,992)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (666,228)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)


</TABLE>
EX-35.1
Servicer Compliance Statement
For SEMT 2011-1

(i)  a review of the Seller's activities during the immediately preceding
     calendar year and of its performance under the applicable Agreement or any
     applicable Reconstitution Agreement during such period has been made under
     such officer's supervision, and
(ii) to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the Seller
     has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Agreement and any
     applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout
     such calendar year.


First Republic Bank
By:    /s/ Chris Zweifel 3/3/12
Name:  Chris Zweifel
Title: Director
#### Morton, Appellant, *v.*City of Cincinnati et al., Appellees.

(Decided January 16, 1939.)

*Mr. Jos. T. Harrison,*for appellant.

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*for appellees.'

Matthews, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law' and fact from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

The action is to enjoin a street assessment. There is no claim that any procedural requirement was omitted by the city officials. The ground alleged for enjoining the collection of the assessment is that it is confiscatory and in violation of (1) the Constitution of the United States, (2) the laws of Ohio limiting special assessments to the benefits conferred and (3) the law limiting the assessment to one-third of the value of the property so assessed.

It is admitted that the plaintiff failed to file objee*330tions to the assessment under the provisions of Section 3848, General Code. This failure precludes him from raising the issue that the assessment exceeds one-third of the value of the property. *Morton*v. *City of Cincinnati,*55 Ohio App., 474, 9 N. E. (2d), 993; *Oker Sons Co.*v. *City of Cincinnati,*45 Ohio App., 466, 187 N. E., 314; 28 Ohio Jurisprudence, 837 *et seq.,*Section 519; *Cuyahoga Falls*v. *Beck,*110 Ohio St., 82, 143 N. E., 661.

This leaves the one question of whether the city has attempted confiscation of the plaintiff’s property in violation of the due process clause of the state Constitution and the 14th Amendment of the federal Constitution. In deciding this question, we are required to presume that the actions of administrative officers were free from wrong, illegality, collusion, and fraud. 28 Ohio Jurisprudence, 841, Section 519. And the court would not he justified in setting aside the administrative finding of the amount of the benefit “unless the amount of such excess is substantial and material, nor unless the fact of such excess is clearly and convincingly shown.” 28 Ohio Jurisprudence, 835, Section 519.

Two witnesses equally credible testified to the amount of the benefits resulting from this improvement. One, the witness for the city, placed the increased value of the lot at $427.50; the other, the witness for the plaintiff, on cross-examination, placed it at $225. The assessment was $221.66.

It is clear that the plaintiff has presented no case for judicial intervention.

For these reasons, the court finds for the defendants and dismisses the plaintiff’s petition.

*Petition dismissed.*

Ross, P. J., and Hamilton, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999, THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                           13,020
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   595,809<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                    132,297
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                266,409
<PP&E>                          763,110
<DEPRECIATION>                  361,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,181,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           424,693
<BONDS>                         487,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            241
<OTHER-SE>                      178,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,181,964
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                418,529
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   249,110<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 20,348<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 71,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               24,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  16,116
<INCOME-TAX>                        330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              15,786
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                         (262)
<NET-INCOME>                     15,524
<EPS-BASIC>                       .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .58
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM INSTALLMENT CONTRACTS
RECEIVABLE LINES ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS NET OF UNEARNED FINANCE CHARGES.
<F2>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE FITNESS CENTER OPERATIONS LINE, THE
ADVERTISING LINE AND THE CHANGE IN DEFERRED MEMBERSHIP ORIGINATION COSTS LINE ON
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
<F3>THIS AMOUNT IS THE MEMBER PROCESSING AND COLLECTION CENTERS LINE ON THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARCH 31, 1998 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000770949
<NAME> REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         143,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  736,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,859
<INVENTORY>                                    531,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,507,057
<PP&E>                                         358,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                 202,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,796,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          632,922
<BONDS>                                        661,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           930
<OTHER-SE>                                     484,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,796,017
<SALES>                                        880,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               879,927
<CGS>                                          566,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  566,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               299,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,358)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of January 27,2011, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2011-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersignedhereby certifies that:

 

1)	I am a duly authorized officer of theServicer.

 

2)	A review of the activities of the Servicerfrom January 27, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance underthe Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)	Based on such review, the Servicer has,to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the RelevantPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executedthis Compliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2012.

 

 

 

HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, as Servicer

 

 

By:  /s/ MIN SOK RANDY PARK          

Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: Chief Financial Officer
REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)


Exhibit 11  -  Statement RE:  Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                            September 30,        September 30,
                                         __________________   _________________

                                          1996      1995        1996      1995   
                                          ____      ____        ____      ____       
<S>                                    <C>        <C>         <C>       <C>
Primary
________________________________

Average shares outstanding               66,431    77,618      70,962    79,264      

Net effect of dilutive stock options      1,360     1,686       1,038     1,338      
                                        _______   _______     _______   _______
    
Total                                    67,791    79,304      72,000    80,602      

                                        =======   =======     =======   =======

Net income                              $50,612   $76,202    $118,840  $163,523

                                        =======   =======     =======   =======

Per share amount                        $  0.75   $  0.96    $   1.65  $   2.03     

                                        =======   =======     =======   ======= 

Fully Diluted
________________________________

Average shares outstanding               66,431    77,618      70,962    79,264      

Net effect of dilutive stock options      1,408     1,686       1,460     1,338      
                                        _______   _______     _______   _______  

Total                                    67,839    79,304      72,422    80,602      

                                        =======   =======     =======   =======  

Net income                              $50,612   $76,202    $118,840  $163,523

                                        =======   =======     =======   =======  

Per share amount                        $  0.75   $  0.96     $  1.64  $   2.03     

                                        =======   =======     =======   =======

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
News United States Air Force
 Registration open for Air University’s 4th LREC SymposiumPublished Feb. 15, 2019
                        
                        
                        Air Force Culture and Language Center
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                Registration is now open for Air University’s 4th annual Language, Regional Expertise and Culture Symposium.
The Air Force Culture and Language Center at Air University hosts the symposium each year providing a platform for academic exchange on topics specific to language, region and culture education in the military. The symposium is March 27-29 and the theme is “Intercultural operability.”
“Military personnel regularly face hurdles of a cultural nature when coordinating efforts at tactical, operational and strategic levels. Therefore, this year’s symposium asks participants to focus on how culture, regional expertise and language are at the heart of interoperability,” said Dr. Patricia Fogarty, AFCLC and symposium co-founder.
Scheduled speakers include Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Robert Sofge Jr., deputy commander, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Pacific; and Matthew Bogdanos, assistant district attorney for New York County and chief of U.S. Antiquities Trafficking Unit.
“The symposium brings together scholars and practitioners from across the DoD and the LREC enterprise to explore issues and initiatives that are designed to equip and prepare our Airmen for success in diverse and uncertain situations,” said Gregory Day, AFCLC director of staff.
To register and for more symposium information, visit the AFCLC website at **www.airuniversity.af.edu/AFCLC/AU-LREC**.
Registration deadline for attendees without a U.S. Department of Defense identification is March 1, 2019. Registration deadline for DoD-affiliated attendees is March 12, 2019.Air Force 



military 



Air University 



Maxwell 



AFCLC 



Language 



culture 



interoperability 



Air Force Culture and Language Center 



Multicultural 



AU 



LREC 



language regional expertise and culture 



AF