alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Matthew W. Shankle, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advance Display
Technologies, Inc.;

   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and I have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
      is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
      business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
      or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

   5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting.

   Date:  May 24, 2004


   /S/ MATTHEW W. SHANKLE
   ------------------------------------------------
   Matthew W. Shankle
   President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Fidelity  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Richard G. Spencer,
Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa L. Griffith, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Richard G. Spencer                       /s/ Lisa L. Griffith
---------------------------------            ---------------------------------
Richard G. Spencer                           Lisa L. Griffith
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer




May 15, 2007
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2533 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

include in any proposed rule that limits greenhouse gas emissions and 

imposes increased costs on other Federal agencies an offset from funds 

available to the Administrator for all projected increased costs that 

the proposed rule would impose on other Federal agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2014 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. JOHNSON

of Wisconsin, Mr. COATS, Mr. JOHANNS, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to include in any proposed rule that limits 

greenhouse gas emissions and imposes increased costs 

on other Federal agencies an offset from funds available 

to the Administrator for all projected increased costs 

that the proposed rule would impose on other Federal 

agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2533 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agency PAYGO for 

3 Greenhouse Gases Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. OFFSETS FOR INCREASED COSTS TO FEDERAL 

5 AGENCIES FOR REGULATIONS LIMITING 

6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the Administrator of the Envi8 ronmental Protection Agency proposes a rule that limits 

9 greenhouse gas emissions and imposes increased costs on 

10 one or more other Federal agencies, the Administrator 

11 shall include in the proposed rule an offset from funds 

12 available to the Administrator for all projected increased 

13 costs that the proposed rule would impose on other Fed14 eral agencies. 

15 (b) NO OFFSETS.—If the Administrator proposes a 

16 rule that limits greenhouse gas emissions and imposes in17 creased costs on one or more other Federal agencies but 

18 does not provide an offset in accordance with paragraph 

19 (1), the Administrator may not finalize the rule until the 

20 promulgation of the final rule is approved by law. 

21 (c) RESTRICTION.—Notwithstanding any other provi22 sion of law, if the Administrator of the Environmental 

23 Protection Agency proposes a rule described in subsection 

24 (a)— 

25 (1) a Federal agency on which the rule imposes 

26 increased costs may not pass the costs imposed by 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2533 IS

1 the rule on to any rate payer of the Federal agency; 

2 and 

3 (2) the proposed rule— 

4 (A) shall be considered to be a rule that 

5 imposes increased costs on a Federal agency; 

6 and 

7 (B) shall be subject to this section. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54385-54386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Announcement of National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) will meet on 
September 22-23, 2010 at the American Institute of Architects Building, 
1735 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20006. The meeting will be 
held in the Gallery Room. The NGAC, which is composed of 
representatives from governmental, private sector, non-profit, and 
academic organizations, was established to advise the Chair of the 
Federal Geographic Data Committee on management of Federal geospatial 
programs, the development of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, 
and the implementation of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
Circular A-16. Topics to be addressed at the meeting include:

--Geospatial Platform.
--Place-Based Policies Initiative.
--Geospatial Metrics.
--FGDC Update.
--Geospatial Program Updates.
--NGAC Subcommittee Reports.

The meeting will include an opportunity for public comment on September 
23. Comments may also be

[[Page 54386]]

submitted to the NGAC in writing. Members of the public who wish to 
attend the meeting must register in advance. Please register by 
contacting Arista Maher at the U.S. Geological Survey (703-648-6283, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33525e525b564173464054401d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f0e020e070a1d2f1a1c081c41080019">[email protected]</span></a>). Registrations are due by September 17, 2010. While 
the meeting will be open to the public, seating may be limited due to 
room capacity.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on September 
22 and from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on September 23.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mahoney, U.S. Geological Survey 
(206-220-4621).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the National Geospatial Advisory 
Committee are open to the public. Additional information about the NGAC 
and the meeting is available at http://www.fgdc.gov/ngac.

    Dated: August 30, 2010.
Ken Shaffer,
Deputy Executive Director, Federal Geographic Data Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-22153 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         689,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    60,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               998,649
<PP&E>                                         1,105,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 741,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,376,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          503,271
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          560,752
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,501
<OTHER-SE>                                     282,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   851,522
<SALES>                                        1,607,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,639,302
<CGS>                                          256,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,339,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               278,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,751)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,751)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
99.3





CONSENT OF EXPERT








Reference is made to the feasibility study entitled
“Feasibility Study and Technical Report Update on the
Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” with an effective date of
June 19, 2014 (the “Report”).





I, Lynn Olssen, on behalf ofSnowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc.
(the
“Company”), consent to the use of the Company’s
name and references to the Report, and to the inclusion or
incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report,
in (i) Pretium Resources
Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December
31, 2016 and (ii) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Registration
Statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-211073) and Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-203409 and 333-213450) filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.








Very truly yours,








/s/
Lynn Olssen





March
30, 2017
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of CenterStaging Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
      the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Roger Paglia,
      Chief Executive Officer of CenterStaging, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section .1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of
      and
      for the periods covered by the Report.







Dated:
      September 28, 2006





/s/
      Roger Paglia


Chief
      Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEON KING.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 13.2






906 Certification




Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549




Ladies and Gentlemen:




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Andy Yang, the Chief Financial Officer of AU Optronics Corp., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AU Optronics Corp.




Date: May 3, 2011


By:
/s/           ANDY YANGName:
Andy YangTitle:
Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AU Optronics Corp. and will be retained by AU Optronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 22Published Aug. 23, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) -- On this look Around the Air Force the new Space Operations Directorate has achieved operating capability, the Pathfinder Initiative protects cyberspace assets, and starting Sept. 1st, 2017, the Express Scripts Tricare pharmacy home delivery program begins. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **New Air Force Space Operations Directorate achieves operating capability**
- **Annual Consent for Automatic Prescription Refills begins Sept. 1**
- **The Cyber Shield**Air Force 



TRICARE 



TV 



AF 



cyber security 



BLUE 



Pharmacy 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



prescriptions 



Express Scripts 



Staff Sgt. Anastasia Tompkins 



Space Directorate 



Pathfinder Initiative 



ATAF
Exhibit 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") by CapSource Financial,
Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Steven J. Kutcher, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CapSource
Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE:  June 14, 2004                   By: /s/ Steven J. Kutcher
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name: Steven J. Kutcher
                                           Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RANDY JOHNSON,

Petitioner

v.

LT. HARRY REED, PA STATE POLICE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 52 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief 

is DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of New Media Lottery Services, Inc., (the
“Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350),
Jeffrey Sternberg, the Director, principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.




Date:
      September 2, 2010
            
            By:
            /s/
      Jeffrey SternbergJeffrey
      SternbergPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
              and
      Principal Financial Officer)




* This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of New Media Lottery Services, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan (as amended), 2000 Director Option Plan,
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Stock Plan and options to purchase
Series E Preferred Stock of our report dated March 24, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Microtune, Inc. included in its
Registration Statement (Form S-1, No. 333-36340) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP


Dallas, Texas
October 6, 2000
NO. 07-04-00405-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

OCTOBER 18, 2004

______________________________

IN RE DAVID L. JONES AND ALICE REDEKER, RELATORS

_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

The Court sua sponte withdraws its opinion of October 11, 2004, and in lieu thereof

substitutes this opinion. Relators David Lee Jones and Alice Redeker seek a writ of mandamus

requesting that we order the Honorable Felix Klein, Judge of the 154th District Court of Lamb

County, to vacate his order of April 23, 2004, denying their motion to compel discovery. In

response, among other things, real party in interest, William B. Jones, Jr. contends that relators

have not demonstrated that the denial of their motion to compel discovery constituted a clear

abuse of discretion by the trial court. For the reasons set forth, we deny the requested relief.

Although the discovery rules encourage trial courts to limit discovery to avoid undue

burdens in production, real party had the burden in the trial court to produce some evidence to

support his request for protection. In re Alford Chevrolet-Geo, 997 S.W.2d 173, 181 (Tex.
2

1999). Here, relators are entitled to mandamus relief “only to correct a trial court’s clear abuse

of discretion when no adequate remedy at law exists.” In Re Alford Chevrolet-Geo, 997 S.W.2d

at 176. In our review, regarding factual matters, as an appellate court we may not substitute our

judgment for that of the trial court. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837-39 (Tex. 1992); In

re Energas Co., 63 S.W.3d 50, 51 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Therefore, in

determining whether mandamus should issue, we must focus on the record that was before the

trial court and decide whether the decision was not only arbitrary but also amounted to a clear

and prejudicial error of law. In re Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 975 S.W.2d 601, 605 (Tex. 1998).

An original proceeding filed in this Court must comply with the requirements of Rule 52

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although a reporter’s record of the hearing is

included, relators’ fact statement in their petition is not supported by a verified affidavit as

required by Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Consequently, relator’s

petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Campbell, J., concurring.
3

NO. 07-04-0405-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

OCTOBER 18, 2004

______________________________

IN RE DAVID L. JONES AND ALICE REDEKER, RELATORS

_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the court’s denial of relators’ petition. In my opinion, relators have not

demonstrated the trial court’s order reflects a clear abuse of its discretion based on the record

presented. In re Alford Chevrolet-Geo, 997 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1999); Walker v. Packer, 827

S.W.2d 833 (Tex. 1992). 

James T. Campbell

 Justice