alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Murphy and Kavanagh *v.*Mooney.

An assistant justice has jurisdiction under the act of 1813, where the plaintiff resides in his district.

Where one defendant resides in the city and the other is a non-resident, they may be sued by a long summons ; and it is no objection to the suit that the summons is served on the non-resident only.

Dec. 30, 1848.

Certiorari to the assistant justice for the district, including the eighth, ninth and fourteenth wards of the city of New York. The suit was commenced before him by Mooney against Murphy and Kavanagh, (by a summons having seven days to run,) for services rendered. The summons was served by copy on K. and personally on M. The defendants below made default, and on proof of Mooney’s demand, the justice rendered a judgment in his favor. The defendants brought a certiorari, and *289assigned for error, that at the time of the commencement of the suit, Mooney was not a resident of either of the wards composing the district of the justice; and that Murphy then resided in the county of Queens, and ICavanagh in the twelfth ward of the city of New York, out of the jurisdiction of the justice. Also, that both onght to have been personally served with process.

To this assignment, Mooney pleaded that at the time of the commencement of the suit below, he resided in the eighth ward of the city. The plaintiffs in error demurred to the plea. They claimed that Mooney’s residence was immaterial; and that the proceedings were void because commenced by a long summons served on a non-resident.

*E. C. Gray,*for the plaintiffs in error.

*Stevens & Hoxie,*for the defendant in error.

By the Court. Vanderpoel, J.

From the plea demurred to, it appears, that the plaintiff below was a resident of the eighth ward, being one of the wards for which the justice was appointed, and it appears too, that one of the defendants resided in Queen’s County, and the other in the twelfth ward of the city.

The plaintiff below residing in the district of the justice, the latter had jurisdiction. (2 R. L. 379, § 103.) One of the defendants residing in the city, it was competent for the plaintiff to proceed by long summons. *(Harriott*v. *Van Cott,*5 Hill, 285 ; *Burghart*v. *Rice,*2 Denio, 95.)

The judgment must be affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports (or incorporated by reference) in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-69235.


                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Dallas, Texas
September 27, 2000
News United States Air Force
 AF seeks nominations for 2019 Brig. Gen. Wilma Vaught AwardPublished Sept. 24, 2018
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Sahara L. Fales
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force officials are seeking nominations for the 2019 Brig. Gen. Wilma Vaught Visionary Leadership Award. The award was created and named in honor of Vaught’s outstanding service and dedication to the Air Force and nation, both during her career and after her retirement.The award is presented to an officer (0-6 and below), enlisted Airman (E-9 and below) and civilian (GS-15 and below) from any career field or occupation who exhibits innovation, commitment and a selfless spirit of service for others and whose personal efforts have improved the integration and opportunities for women in the Air Force. Nominations for the award are based on contributions that occurred Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2018. This does not rule out a project that may have started more than a year ago, but was completed during the current calendar year.Each major command, combatant command, field operating agency and direct reporting unit may submit three nominations (one for each category) to the Air Force’s Personnel Center no later than Oct. 17. Eligibility and application procedures are available via myPers. Select “any” from the dropdown menu and search “Vaught.”innovation 



officer 



spirit 



nominations 



enlisted 



Air Force Personnel Center 



award 



civilian 



women 



Service 



dedication 



commitment 



Brig Gen Wilma Vaught 



selfless 



Air Force 



AFPC 



vaught 



visionary 



leadership
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998, THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                65,981
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        501,312 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         107,536
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     289,274
<PP&E>                                               649,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                       323,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,051,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                390,849
<BONDS>                                              406,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 236
<OTHER-SE>                                           161,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,051,113
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     365,364
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        223,293 <F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      19,692 <F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      61,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    20,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        4,326
<INCOME-TAX>                                             250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    4,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           4,076
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .16
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM INSTALLMENT
CONTRACTS RECEIVABLE LINES ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS NET OF UNEARNED FINANCE CHARGES.
<F2>THIS AMOUNT IS THE SUM OF THE FITNESS CENTER OPERATIONS LINE, THE
ADVERTISING LINE AND THE CHANGE IN DEFERRED MEMBERSHIP ORIGINATION COSTS
LINE ON THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
<F3>THIS AMOUNT IS THE MEMBER PROCESSING AND COLLECTION CENTERS LINE ON THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### CLOVERLEAF GARDENS ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP v. RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARL A. COOK.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>
Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation - Form 10-Q                   Exhibit (i)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 1996
Page 20 of 22

             FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT
             ----------------------------------------------

Pitney Bowes Inc. ("PBI") and Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation ("PBCC")
(collectively the "Parties" or individually the "Party") make this
agreement this 6th day of November, 1996 ("Agreement").

    WHEREAS, the Parties wish to terminate in its entirety the existing
    operating agreement between the Parties dated March 3, 1977, as
    amended, and supersede it with this successor Agreement.

    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
    contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
    Parties agree as follows:

1.  TERM AND TERMINATION:  This Agreement shall take effect upon execution
    by both Parties.  It shall remain in effect until it is canceled by the
    mutual consent of the Parties or it is canceled by one Party giving the
    other Party ninety (90) days prior written notice of termination.

2.  BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PARTIES:  The Parties agree that they
    will regularly review their business relationship and their respective
    policies and procedures so as to continuously improve their
    competitiveness and their service to customers.  The current policies
    and procedures may be amended from time to time by the Parties in a
    writing mutually agreed to by the Parties.  A Party proposing to
    modify, amend, substitute, or delete a policy or procedure, or
    establish a new policy or procedure, shall give written notice to the
    President of the other Party.  The notice shall be accompanied by the
    proposal.  The Parties shall meet as soon as necessary and reasonably
    practicable to discuss the proposal.

3.  GOVERNING LAW; SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:  This Agreement shall be
    governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
    Connecticut.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
    benefit of PBI and PBCC and their respective successors and assigns.
    This Agreement is not intended to, and does not, inure to the benefit
    of any third parties.

4.  INDEPENDENT OBLIGATION:  This Agreement does not amend or modify any
    other agreement between the Parties including, without limitation, the
    Parties' Finance Agreement as amended July 12, 1995, and further this
    Agreement does not constitute a guaranty by one Party of any of the
    obligations of the other Party.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be
    executed by their respective representatives as of the day and year
    first above written.


/s/ Matthew S. Kissner                   /s/ Michael J. Critelli
-----------------------------------      ---------------------------------------
Matthew S. Kissner                       Michael J. Critelli
President & Chief Executive Officer      Vice Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation          Pitney Bowes Inc.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Encompass Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 3, 2006              ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE I. HANDLER
                                 --------------------------
                                 Leslie I. Handler, President
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen D. Bard, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Stephen D. BardName: Stephen D. Bard Date: March 17, 2014
#### Leland MONHOLLON, Appellant, v. Gawinna Owens MONHOLLON and William P. Mulloy, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 29, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 7, 1973.

William P. Hurley, Jr., Edward T. Ewen, Jr., Louisville, for appellant.

William P. Mulloy, F. Larkin Fore, Louisville, for appellees.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner VANCE,

Reversing.*
News United States Air Force
 Air Force introduces new, improved tool to manage civilian benefitsPublished Aug. 23, 2017
                        
                        By Richard Salomon
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force is the first agency in the Department of Defense to roll out a new tool that helps government civilians more effectively manage their benefits and entitlement information. 
The Government Retirement and Benefits Platform is a web-based application that allows employees to make changes and updates to their health insurance, life insurance, Thrift Savings Plan and other personal benefit information. 
The GRB Platform replaces the Employee Benefits Information System, which replaced most paper-based processes in 1996. 
“The GRB Platform includes all the functionality previously offered with EBIS, but in a much more intuitive and user-friendly environment,” said Annette Castro, an Air Force Personnel Center human resource specialist. “It gives employees the ability to easily obtain and request various retirement estimates, complete their retirement packages and review their current benefits coverage.”  
The site also contains informational videos, facts sheets, electronic forms, calculators, retirement courses and links to external websites to help individuals make important decisions regarding their benefits.  
Employees can access the GRB Platform application through **AFPC Secure** by selecting the “GRB Platform” application link. Employees should see a brief video explaining the new system the first time they log in. 
“This is another example of how we are providing smarter and more efficient personnel services to our customers worldwide,” Castro said. “It’s important that we continue to improve and enhance all of our business processes, so our customers can have what they need right at their fingertips.” 
For more information, visit the **myPers** web site and search “GRB Platform.” Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the **Air Force’s Personnel Center** website.Air Force 



AFPC 



DOD 



AETC 



AF 



TSP 



Thrift Savings Plan 



Air Force Personnel Center 



Department of Defense 



Air Education and Training Command 



civilian 



joint base 



Government Retirement and Benefits Platform 



GRB 



Employment Benefits Information System 



EBIS 



JB San Antonio-Randolph
Exhibit 4.1 Agreement with Legal Councel


EXHIBIT 4.1




May 30, 2014




Richardson & Patel, LLP

The Chrysler Building

405 Lexington Avenue, 49th Floor

New York, NY 10174

Attn: David N. Feldman




Re:

Issuance of Shares for Legal Services




Dear Mr. Feldman:




This letter confirms our plan to issue to certain attorneys of Richardson & Patel LLP (the “Firm”), 85,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”), to be registered on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in payment of $55,250 (the “Payment Amount”) due to the Firm by APT Systems, Inc. for legal services.  The legal services were not in connection with any capital raising transaction or with directly or indirectly promoting or maintaining a market for the securities of APT Systems, Inc.




Your signature below indicates the Firm’s acceptance of the Shares in full satisfaction of the Payment Amount.




Regards,




APT Systems, Inc.










/s/Glenda Dowie

Glenda Dowie

Chief Executive Officer







ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:




RICHARDSON & PATEL, LLP







By:

/s/ David N. Feldman

David N. Feldman

Partner
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group, Pediatrics Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         March 18, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division Of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1487,                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 27, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2199 Filed 2-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### EDWARD SAUNDERLIN v. E.I. DUPONT COMPANY.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification granted. (See 199 *N.J.Super.*145)
News United States Air Force
 USAF announces Hack the Air Force 3.0Published Nov. 5, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force and HackerOne have teamed up for Hack the Air Force 3.0, the military service’s third and most inclusive bug bounty program.
HtAF, which stems from the Department of Defense’s “Hack the Pentagon,” allows computer experts to uncover vulnerabilities in Air Force websites, ultimately strengthening the service’s cyber posture. This year’s four-week-long program ends Nov. 22, and will focus on DoD applications that were recently migrated to an Air Force-owned cloud environment. 
The program is open to 191 countries, making it the government’s largest bug bounty to date. 
"Hack the AF 3.0 demonstrates the Air Forces willingness to fix vulnerabilities that present critical risks to the network,” said Wanda Jones-Heath, Air Force chief information security officer.
Hack the Air Force 3.0 offers competitive bounty awards dependent on the severity of the finding. A critical severity vulnerability nets a minimum of $5,000, with potential increase based on overall system impact. The largest single payout to date in the Hack the Pentagon public program was $10,000.
The program’s initiative was launched by the Defense Digital Service in April 2016 as the first bug bounty program employed by the federal government. More than 1,400 hackers registered to participate in the program. Nearly 200 reports were received within the first six hours of its launch and $75,000 in total bounties were paid out to participating hackers.Air Force 



DOD 



AF 



Department of Defense 



cyber security 



bug bounty 



Hack the Pentagon 



HtAF 



HtAF 3.0 



Hack the Air Force
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

** OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxisInc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), John M. Carradine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and RonaldK. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

                (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

                (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| By: /s/ John M. Carradine |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
| John M. Carradine         |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
| November 9, 2007          |
|                      |
|                      |
|                      |
| By: /s/ Ronald K. Herbert |
|                      |
| Ronald K. Herbert         |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| November 9, 2007          |

 

 

----