alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
525 A.2d 863

#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, Appellant *v.*Thomas John Didyoung, Appellee.

Submitted on briefs October 30, 1986,

to President Judge Crumlish, Jr., Judge Colins, and Senior Judge Blatt, sitting as a panel of three.

*119*Harold H.*Cramer, Assistant Counsel, with him, *Spencer A. Manthorpe,*Chief Counsel, and *Jay C. Waldman,*General Counsel, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

May 13, 1987:

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT), appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court), which amended and reduced DOTs twelve-month suspension of the drivers license of Thomas John Didyoung (appellee). The suspension was ordered because of his conviction1 for driving under the influence, pursuant to Section 1532(b)(3) of the Vehicle Code (Code).2

The sole issue before us is whether or not the trial court possessed the authority to reduce the legislatively-mandated period of suspension set forth in Section 1532(b)(3).

*120Judicial review of an administrative suspension of a. drivers license is limited to determining whether or not the motorist has been convicted and whether or not DOT has faithfully observed the provisions of the Code in issuing the suspension. *Kuzar v. Department of Transportation,*96 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 626, 508 A.2d 397 (1986). The record here clearly demonstrates that the appellee was convicted as charged and that DOT has properly applied the relevant provisions of the Code.3 Under such circumstances, we must conclude that the trial court erred in reducing the statutorily prescribed sentence.4

Accordingly, we will reverse the order of the trial court and we will reinstate the twelve-month suspension imposed by DOT.

Order

And Now, this 13th day of May, 1987, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County, in the above-captioned matter, is reversed and the suspension of Thomas John Didyoungs drivers license, as imposed by the Department of Transportation, is reinstated.

1

 Under the criminal provisions of 75 Pa. C.S.A. §3731, a conviction includes a suspension of operator privileges for not less than one month but not more than twelve months. As a result of a plea bargain, the appellee pled guilty to the underlying criminal charge and received, *inter alia,*a six-month suspension of his operators privileges. The trial court, *in the civil matter from, which this appeal arose,*reasoned that, inasmuch as the criminal charges resulted in a six-month suspension, the civil suspension was required to be coextensive.

2

 Section 1532(b)(3), 75 Pa. C. S. § 1532(b)(3), pertinently provides that “[t]he department *shall*suspend the operating privilege of any driver for 12 months upon receiving a certified record of the drivers conviction of section 3731 (relating to driving under influence of alcohol or controlled substance). . . .” (Emphasis added.)

3

*See*footnote 2.

4

 Our review here includes, *inter alia,*errors of law. *In Re: Appeal of Finkelstein, 73*Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 417, 458 A.2d 326 (1983).
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis R. Miller, certify that:

1.       I  have  reviewed  this  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Elmer's
Restaurants, Inc.;

2.       Based  on my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

/s/ Dennis R. Miller
----------------------------------
Dennis R. Miller
Secretary and Corporate Controller
November 18, 2004
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HENRY THOMAS LITTLE.

July 11, 1985.

Petitions for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: July 19Published July 19, 2017
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Robbie Arp
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) -- On this look around the Air Force a Wounded Warrior receives the Pat Tillman award at the ESPYs, a medical exercise in Minnesota provides free healthcare for local residents, and Red Flag 17-3 features F-35s from both the Air Force and the Marine Corps. Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Robbie Arp.
For previous episodes, click **here**.
Related stories:
- **Red Flag 17-3 kicking up summer heat with Air force, Marine F-35s**
- **SEAC visits with Nevada Airmen**
- **MSgt Del Toro wins Pat Tillman Award at 2017 ESPYs**
- **148th Fighter Wing**wounded warrior 



Lightning II 



F-35A 



Marine Corps 



Minnesota 



ESPN 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



f-35b 



Red Flag 17-3 



Cass Lake 



MSgt Israel Del Toro 



Tech. Sgt. Robbie Arp 



Pat Tillman Award 



ESPY Awards 



ATAF
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1


                                   REMEC, Inc.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE


                                             Three months ended
                                             ------------------
                                         May 4, 1997    May 5, 1996
                                         -----------    -----------
Net income per common share:
  Net income                             $ 2,472,885     $1,007,849

Weighted average shares outstanding:
  Common stock                            12,176,289      9,438,752
  Effect of common stock equivalents         434,634        113,785
                                         -----------     ----------
                                          12,610,923      9,552,537
                                         -----------     ----------
Net income per common share              $      0.20     $     0.11
                                         ===========     ==========


                                     - 16 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000771677
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85B LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         374,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               378,920
<PP&E>                                       4,161,116
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,422,166)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,117,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          296,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,821,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,117,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.93
        

</TABLE>
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 196TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th 

day of September, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Christopher Anthony Davidson, 

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-15-00065-CR

Trial Court No. 29922

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Christopher Anthony Davidson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 17th day of November, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 I, A. Dale Mayo, certify that:
 
 1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Cinema Destinations, Corp.;
 
 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading, with respect to the periods covered by this report;
 
 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)[Omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-15(a).]
 
 (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: September 24, 2012
/s/ A. Dale Mayo

A. Dale Mayo, Chief Executive Officerand Chairman
EXHIBIT 99(B)



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE







I, John Weisickle, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President/Finance of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of May 1, 2002 among the Servicer, American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Delaware), as Owner Trustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2002-2 Owner Trust and Citibank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee as follows:



(i)

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve month period ended March 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;



(ii)

To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period; and



(iii)

To the best of my knowledge and information, no Event of Default nor any event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, would become an Event of Default under the Agreement, has occurred or is continuing.



This certificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section 3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective May 1, 2002, which terms and conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of June, 2004.





/s/ John Weisickle

Name: John Weisickle

Title:   Vice President/Finance
#### GRAND LAND COMPANY v. TOWNSHIP OF BETHLEHEM AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC.

May 6, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification denied. (See 196 *N.J.Super.*547)
| | KPMG LLP                       | Telephone | (306) 934-6200
| | ------------------------------ | --------- | --------------
| | Chartered Accountants          | Fax       | (306) 934-6233
| | 600-128 4th Avenue South       | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca   
| | Saskatoon Saskatchewan S7K 1M8 |           |               
| | Canada                         |           |               



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors of Claude Resources
Inc.



We consent to the use in this annual
report on Form 40-F of:



| | ─ | our report dated March 30, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Claude
Resources Inc. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31,
2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity
and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes comprising a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information, and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ─ | our report dated March 30, 2012 with respect to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



each of which is included in this annual
report on Form 40-F.







Chartered Accountants



March 30, 2012



Saskatoon, Canada



KPMG LLP, is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a
member firm of the KPMG

network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International
Cooperative

(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
News United States Air Force
 AF senior leaders, international visitors observe Light Attack ExperimentPublished Aug. 9, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force senior leaders and international visitors gathered at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, to observe the ongoing Light Attack Experiment Aug. 9, 2017.
During the first week of the experiment, Air Force pilots flew basic surface attack missions in Textron Aviation’s AT-6 Wolverine turboprop, as well as in Sierra Nevada Corp. and Embraer’s A-29 Super Tucano.
“We’re experimenting and innovating, and we’re doing it in new and faster ways,” said Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson. “Experiments like these help drive innovation and play a key role in enhancing the lethality of our force.” 
Air Force pilots also completed familiarization flights in Textron Aviation’s Scorpion jet, as well as in Air Tractor Inc. and L3 Platform Integration Division’s AT-802L Longsword. 
Pilots will continue to fly the four aircraft through a range of combat mission scenarios during the live-fly experiment to evaluate each platform’s military utility. The live-fly experiment is part of a broader Air Force effort to explore cost-effective attack platform options under the Light Attack Experimentation Campaign run by the Air Force Strategic Development Planning and Experimentation Office at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.  
 
“This experiment is about looking at new ways to improve readiness and lethality,” said Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David Goldfein. “Working with industry, and building on the Combat Dragon series of tests, we are determining whether a commercial off-the-shelf aircraft and sensor package can contribute to the coalition fight against violent extremism. I appreciate industry's willingness to show us what they have to offer.”
The Air Force established vendor parameters in the initial invitation-to-participate earlier this year. Industry members were asked to propose aircraft that could potentially meet an Air Force need for a low-cost capability that is supportable and sustainable. 
Scenarios during the experiment are designed to highlight aspects of various combat missions, such as close air support, air interdiction, combat search and rescue and strike coordination and reconnaissance. The experiment includes the use of weapons generally used on fighter and attack aircraft to evaluate the participating aircraft’s ability to execute traditional counter-land missions.Holloman AFB 



Light Attack 



CSAF 



SecAF 



coalition 



industry 



commercial aircraft 



budget 



cost-cutting 



AF Strategic Development Planning and Experimentation 



Wright-Patterson AFB 



Aviation Related Links
        Light Attack Experiment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000771677
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-B PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         401,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               401,476
<PP&E>                                       4,110,288
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,405,178)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,106,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          292,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,813,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,106,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                210,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            210,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   210,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    31.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    31.01
        


</TABLE>