alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 26, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Zions Bancorporation*, Salt Lake City, Utah; to acquire indirectly through NetDeposit, LLC, Salt Lake City, Utah, all of the assets of Creative Cash Flow Solutions, Ltd., Lindenhurst, New York, and thereby engage data processing services under section 225.28(b)(14) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-221 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              63
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                       375
<INVENTORY>                                      3,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,698
<PP&E>                                          36,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,448
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,332
<SALES>                                         27,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,935
<CGS>                                           29,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          290
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,963)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 87-6307.

#### Henderson *v.*Internal Revenue Service.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 33.2



|                                                 |  |                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO  3000 Leadenhall Road
 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 |  | Glen A. Messina President and CEO
 Tel: (856) 917-6847
Fax: (856) 917-6145 glen.messina@phh.com www.phh.com





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from
January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in
Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the
Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party;
however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well
as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the Platform).

The
Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage
Corporation

Date: February 26, 2015



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Glen A. Messina                   
|Glen A. Messina                       
|President                             
|                                      
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
#### SHIRLEY ALPER v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNION COUNTY COLLEGE.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2496 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2496

To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with respect to waters 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2014

 Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Risch, Mr. 
Rubio, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Johanns, Mr. 
Enzi, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Boozman, 
Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Paul, Mr. Thune, Mr. Isakson, 
  Mr. Heller, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. 
 Cruz, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Burr) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with respect to waters 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Water and Property Rights 
Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. IDENTIFICATION OF WATERS PROTECTED BY THE CLEAN WATER ACT.

    (a) In General.--Neither the Secretary of the Army nor the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall--
            (1) finalize the proposed rule entitled ``Definition of 
        `Waters of the United States' Under the Clean Water Act'' (79 
        Fed. Reg. 22188 (April 21, 2014)); or
            (2) use the proposed rule described in paragraph (1), or 
        any substantially similar proposed rule or guidance, as the 
        basis for any rulemaking or any decision regarding the scope or 
        enforcement of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
        U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
    (b) Rules.--The use of the proposed rule described in subsection 
(a)(1), or any substantially similar proposed rule or guidance, as the 
basis for any rulemaking or any decision regarding the scope or 
enforcement of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 
et seq.) shall be grounds for vacation of the final rule, decision, or 
enforcement action.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5638]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         RECESS UNTIL 2:15 P.M.

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will now 
stand in recess until the hour of 2:15 p.m.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 12:37 p.m., recessed until 2:16 p.m., 
whereupon, the Senate reassembled when called to order by the Presiding 
Officer [Mr. Kyl].

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5851]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS

                                 ______

                PRESIDENTIAL SERVICE AWARD FOR SAFEHAVEN

 Mr. HATFIELD. Mr. President, today, Ms. Nellie Bradwell and 
Ms. Joyce Adams are in Washington, DC, on behalf of SAFEHAVEN of 
Portland, OR, to accept a 1995 Presidential Service Award which will be 
presented by President Clinton. I would like to take a moment of the 
Senate's time to congratulate the volunteers of SAFEHAVEN, a latchkey 
program serving at-risk youth ages 5 to 12 in Portland's inner-city.
  The Points of Light Foundation, which selects annual award winners, 
is dedicated to promoting voluntarism, increasing the activity of local 
volunteer centers and assuring the public knows that volunteers are key 
components of a healthy and happy community. This year, 18 individuals 
and organizations have been selected to receive the prestigious 
President's Service Award out of over 3,000 nominations.
  Ms. Bradwell, Ms. Adams and all of SAFEHAVEN's volunteers provide a 
safe and nurturing environment for at-risk youth after school and on 
Saturdays. The area they serve in the inner-northeast part of Portland 
has one of the city's highest juvenile crime rates, and SAFEHAVEN is 
attempting to make a positive change. While helping to meet the 
material needs of its participants, their program offers recreational 
activities, educational development and church services.
  SAFEHAVEN is already making plans to continue their services through 
participants' high school years and provide a summer youth camp. I am 
deeply grateful to all of SAFEHAVEN's volunteers. Serving as teachers, 
mentors and friends they are having a positive impact on Portland's 
youth and community; an impact which is sure to be lasting.

                          ____________________
```
Abatement Order filed October 23, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00710-CV

____________

NATHANIEL SHELTON AND MARCIA SHELTON, Appellants

V.

ALFRED KALBOW, AS TRUSTEE OF ALFRED MARTIAL TRUST, ET.

AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 335th District Court

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 35589

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 29, 2014. Appellee Alfred 

Kalbow, trustee of the Alfred Kalbow Marital Trust, filed a motion to dismiss for 

want of jurisdiction. It appears from the record that the judgment may not be final. 

See McNally v. Guevara, 52 S.W.3d 195, 196 (Tex. 2001) (judgment that did not 

dispose of attorney’s fees was not an appealable judgment, and party’s omission of 

attorney’s fees in motion for summary judgment did not waive the claim).
The Texas Supreme Court has advised that if an appellate court is uncertain 

about the intent of an order to finally dispose of all claims and parties, it can abate 

the appeal to permit clarification by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 

39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides 

as follows:

The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not final to be 

modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and 

all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.

Tex. R. App. P. 27.2. 

Accordingly, we order the case abated and remanded to the trial court for a 

period of thirty days so that the trial court may clarify whether the partial summary 

judgment became final when the severance order was signed, and to permit the 

parties to obtain an order or orders disposing of attorneys’ fees, if necessary. A 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s clarifying order(s) shall be 

filed with the clerk of this court on or before December 1, 2014. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may 

reinstate the appeal on its own motion. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2571 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park 

to include the Wallis House and Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National 

Battlefield Park to include the Wallis House and 

Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain 

5 National Battlefield Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 

6 2014’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 Congress finds that— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2571 IS

1 (1) Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

2 Park was authorized as a unit of the National Park 

3 System on June 26, 1935, prior to which year, parts 

4 of the Park had been acquired and protected by Civil 

5 War veterans and the War Department; 

6 (2) Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 

7 Park protects Kennesaw Mountain and Kolb’s 

8 Farm, which are battle sites along the route of Gen9 eral Sherman’s 1864 campaign to take Atlanta; 

10 (3) most of the Kennesaw Mountain National 

11 Battlefield Park protects Confederate positions and 

12 strategy; 

13 (4) the Wallis House is one of the few original 

14 structures remaining from the Battle of Kennesaw 

15 Mountain associated with Union positions and strat16 egy; and 

17 (5) the Wallis House is strategically located 

18 next to a Union signal station at Harriston Hill. 

19 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT; LAND ACQUISITION; AD20 MINISTRATION. 

21 (a) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Ken23 nesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park is modi24 fied to include the approximately 8 acres identified 

25 as ‘‘Wallis House and Harriston Hill’’ and generally 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2571 IS

1 depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain 

2 National Battlefield Park, Proposed Boundary Ad3 justment’’, numbered 325/80,020, and dated Feb4 ruary 2010. 

5 (2) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map referred 

6 to in paragraph (1) shall be on file and available for 

7 inspection in the appropriate offices of the National 

8 Park Service. 

9 (b) LAND ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Inte10 rior may acquire, from willing owners only, land or inter11 ests in land described in subsection (a) by donation or ex12 change. 

13 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary of the Interior 

14 shall administer land and interests in land acquired under 

15 this section as part of the Kennesaw Mountain National 

16 Battlefield Park in accordance with applicable law (includ17 ing regulations). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5747]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    KOREAN AGREED NUCLEAR FRAMEWORK

  Mr. THOMAS. Mr. President, I find myself in the unfortunate position 
of once more coming to the floor to briefly discuss the lack of 
progress being made in the implementation of the United States-North 
Korea Agreed Nuclear Framework.
  During the recent recess, talks in Berlin between us and the North 
Koreans broke down. The point of contention continues to be the DPRK's 
obstinate refusal to accept two light-water reactors of South Korea 
manufacture as called for in the agreement. Mr. President I--and, I am 
sure, our negotiators headed by Ambassador Galucci--have grown weary of 
the North's negotiating tactics. Last-minute brinkmanship has failed to 
work for them in the past; I am unsure why they think if they continue 
to pursue that course we will eventually relent.
  Korean's have a saying about the futility of trying to influence 
someone too stubborn to listen: ``reading into an ox's ear.'' At the 
risk of reading into the ``Pyongyang ox's'' ear, let me say it one more 
time. As I have said before as the chairman of the Subcommittee on East 
Asian and Pacific Affairs, we should not accept any deviation from the 
agreed framework on the part of the DPRK. As called for in the 
agreement, North Korea must accept the two light-water reactors from 
South Korea. It must not refire its Yongbyon reactor. It must cease its 
attempts to produce fissile material. It must take steps toward 
initiating and maintaining a bilateral relationship with the South. The 
consequence for their failure to live up to the agreement is very 
straight-forward: a return to the Security Council and the imposition 
of tough sanctions.
  Mr. President, this is their choice--in black and white. There is no 
subtlety, no innuendo, no hidden message. Our negotiators have done an 
admirable job in continuing to press the North Koreans; I urge them to 
stick to their guns.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                      |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/ PETER H. VAN OPPEN                                  
|                      |  | Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer