alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident


Date: June 14, 2010

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date:
June 14, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to REMEC, Inc., and will be retained by REMEC, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50115

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENARO NAVARRETE-ZAVALA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-1745-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Genaro NavarreteZavala raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 Firefighter training goes virtualPublished April 1, 2019
                        
                        By Charles J. Haymond
                        
                        
                        55th Wing Public Affairs
                **OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AFNS) --**
                Firefighters train weekly to maintain readiness, so when the call comes to put their lives at risk for the people they serve, they are prepared.
Whether in training or on a live fire, they are susceptible to various carcinogenic toxins - until now.
To help reduce the inhalation of toxins, more and more fire departments are purchasing virtual reality equipment to provide a safer way to train their members. Offutt Air Force Base is one of them.
The 55th Civil Engineer Squadron fire department recently used innovation funds to purchase a simulator that provides real world scenarios to enhance their skills without being in an unsafe environment.
“This trainer allows firefighters to fight fires in a virtual controlled environment that detects whether agent is applied correctly to extinguish fires,” said David Eblin, 55th CES installation fire chief. “The trainer mimics the heat a firefighter feels and presents a multitude of fire scenarios, to include building and aircraft fires.”
Not only is the simulator safer, but it is also more cost effective and easier to use.
Now firefighters do not have to load up their rigs with equipment, water, gas and wear heavy equipment when training. They are able to train in their training rooms without leaving the facility.
“With the cost of firefighter personal protective exceeding $3,000 and the high cost of specialized firefighting vehicles - $500,000 to $800,000 - this trainer saves wear and tear, fuel and operational costs on these high dollar assets as they are not used as often,” Eblin said.
The simulator consists of a head monitor display, nozzle and protective clothing.
The computer central processing unit is in the simulated firefighter air tank system that the individual places on their back. This simulated tank is much lighter than what the firefighters would normally wear during a call.
“Lightweight means less physical stress on our bodies,” said Carlos Ruffin, 55th CES firefighter driver operator. “Our vehicles, and equipment would also stay in-service, allowing for faster responses to real world emergencies that occur while we’re training.”
While the simulator allows skill sharpening in a safe environment, the department recognizes the authenticity of a real fire is the best way to learn.
“There’s no substitute for fighting real fires,” Ruffin said. “In order to do what we do, we have to know how fire is going to react when you introduce something new to that environment - water, foam, ventilation, etc. If you apply any of those examples in the wrong way, you could end up hurting yourself and others.”LR 



innovation 



Offutt AFB 



firefighter 



training 



virtual 



readiness 



Fire Department 



toxins 



carcinogen 



AF 



Air Force 



simulator
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
JUNE 30, 1997 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000770949
<NAME> REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         122,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  708,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,419
<INVENTORY>                                    580,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,470,817
<PP&E>                                         370,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                 187,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,785,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          578,788
<BONDS>                                        768,228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           929
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,785,378
<SALES>                                      1,771,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,771,413
<CGS>                                        1,091,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,091,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               554,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

HEALTHAXIS INC.                                                       EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands except per share data)                                       Three Months Ended June 30      Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                                             2000              1999          2000             1999
<S>                                                                          <C>               <C>            <C>              <C>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Earnings (Loss) Per Share

NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK:                             ($13,388)         ($10,539)      $(25,061)       $(13,440)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
   Common stock                                                             13,098            12,039         13,072          11,797
   Common stock equivalents applicable to stock options and warrants                                               *               *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total                                                                 13,098            12,039         13,072          11,797
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:                                           (1.02)        $   (0.88)      $  (1.92)       $  (1.14)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK:                              (13,388)         $(10,539)      $(25,061)       $(13,440)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
   Common stock                                                             13,098            12,039         13,072          11,797
   Common stock equivalents applicable to stock options and warrants              *                 *              *               *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total                                                                 13,098            12,039         13,072          11,797
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:                                     (1.02)        $   (0.88)      $  (1.92)       $  (1.14)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   * Anti-dilutive; therefore effects have been excluded.
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8147

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL EUGENE FARMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:02-cr-00131-BO-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, 

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Farmer appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Farmer, No. 5:02-cr-00131-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 

20, 2009, entered Nov. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing by CDEX, Inc. (the "Company") of its Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 (the "Report") I,
Stephen A. McCommon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:


     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Financial Officer of CDEX, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CDEX, Inc. and will be retained by CDEX, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


 /s/ Stephen A. McCommon
------------------------
Stephen A. McCommon
Chief Financial Officer



Date: March 12, 2009
#### Hartwell *v.*Kingsley.

Where a defendant moves to dissolve an injunction on his answer only, without replying upon affidavits in addition thereto; the plaintiff cannot read in opposition to* the motion, his reply Verified, or any affidavits other than those upon which the-injunction was granted.

December, 1849.

Motion to dissolve an injunction, made upon1 the sworn answer of the defendants.

*E. W. Stoughton,*for the defendant,

*L. S. Ashley,*for the plaintiff.

Sandford, J.

The plaintiff seeks to read Ms reply duly verified, and sundry affidavits recently made, in opposition to- the-motion to dissolve the injunction which is founded upon the answer only. It is true the answer must be sworn, in order to1 move upon it; but it is nevertheless *the answer,*and the application to dissolve, is not made upon *affidavits*on the part of the-defendant, within the meaning of section 226 of the amended) code. The previous section shows clearly, that the answer is a document entirely distinct from the affidavits, upon which with) or without the answer, the motion to dissolve the injunction may be made. The answer cannot be used at all in support of the motion, unless it be verified; so that when the code here speaks of an answer, it means a sworn answer. The plaintiff therefore, by the express terms of the 226th section; is precluded from opposing the motion by affidavits or proofs in addition to those on which the injunction was granted.(a)

(a)

**This point was so ruled by the whole court in March 1849, on an appeal froms an order at chambers, in the case of v. *Barker.*See to the same effect, ruled in the supreme court in this district by Hurlbut and Edwards, J. J., *Servoss*v. *Stannard, 2*Code Reporter, 56.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT MITCHNER.

February 26, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,327
<SECURITIES>                                       427
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                       402
<INVENTORY>                                     21,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,362
<PP&E>                                           6,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,693
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,078
<SALES>                                         47,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,672
<CGS>                                           33,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,998
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

                           FORM 10-QSB/A CERTIFICATION

         I, Leslie I. Handler, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Encompass
Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ending March 31, 2005;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Encompass Holdings,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Encompass Holdings, Inc., including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b. Not Required

         c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Encompass Holdings, Inc.'s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d. Not Required

         5. Not Required

March 3, 2006                    Encompass Holdings, Inc.

                                 By: /s/ LESLIE I. HANDLER
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Leslie I. Handler, President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0509

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ROBERT WINKOWITSCH

Appellee,

-vsGLACIER ELECTRIC 

COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Appellant.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ORDER GRANTING 

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF 

APPELLANT GLACIER 

ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, 

INC. FOR AN EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE ITS OPENING 

BRIEF

Appellant Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc. having moved in accordance 

with Rule 26(1), M.R.App.P., for an extension of time of thirty (30) days, up to 

and including April 26, 2023, within which to file and serve its opening brief, and 

the motion being unopposed, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted; Appellant’s opening 

brief in this matter is now due on April 26, 2023.

Dated this __ day of March, 2023.

_________________________________

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 23 2023

03/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0509
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of China Health Resource, Inc., f/k/a Voice Diary Inc. (“CHRI”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhou, Yi, Chief Financial Officer****of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 12, 2008

 

/s/ Zhou, Yi

Zhou, Yi

Chief Financial Officer****

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CHRI and will be retained by CHRI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.