alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2323 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that fathers 

of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be included 

with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in 

the civil service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2014 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that fathers of certain permanently disabled or 

deceased veterans shall be included with mothers of such 

veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in the civil 

service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Fathers Act 

5 of 2014’’. 


TJAMES on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2323 IS

1 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS 

2 OF CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR 

3 DECEASED VETERANS. 

4 Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and in6 serting the following: 

7 ‘‘(F) the parent of an individual who lost 

8 his or her life under honorable conditions while 

9 serving in the armed forces during a period 

10 named by paragraph (1)(A) of this section, if— 

11 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to12 tally and permanently disabled; or 

13 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

14 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le15 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

16 ‘‘(G) the parent of a service-connected per17 manently and totally disabled veteran, if— 

18 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to19 tally and permanently disabled; or 

20 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

21 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le22 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

23 and’’. 


TJAMES on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2323 IS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

3 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


TJAMES on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Zuoli Xu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   April 19, 2012 |                             |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                        |                             |
| By:                         | /s/   Alex Zuoli Xu              |   |
|                        | Name:   Alex Zuoli Xu            |   |
|                        | Title:   Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated February 22, 2001 (except for Notes 1, 2, 8, and 18 as
to which the date is March 15, 2001), in the Registration Statement on Form S-4
and related Prospectus of Delco Remy International, Inc. for the registration of
the 11% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
July 17, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Intent To Grant an Exclusive Field of Use License of a U.S. 
Government-Owned Patent Application

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e), and 37 CFR 404.7 
(a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, 
revocable license for the field of use in the research reagent market 
to the invention described in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/252,675 
entitled ``Enhanced Substrates for The Protease Activity of Serotype A 
Botulinum Neurotoxin,'' filed October 18, 2009, to List Biological 
Laboratories, with its principal place of business at 540 Division 
Street, Campbell, California 95008-6906.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, 
Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA), (301) 619-6664. 
For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-
7808, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of 
this license can file written objections along with supporting 
evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication. 
Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (see 
ADDRESSES).

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-22175 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


Pursuant
      To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report Nayna Networks, Inc. (formerly ResCon
      Technology Corp.), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned, William Wong, Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, herby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*Date:
                November 20, 2006*
            *By:*
            */S/
                William Wong**William
                Wong,*
              *Principal
                Financial Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                          18,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,378
<INVENTORY>                                    132,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,525
<PP&E>                                         280,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,656
<BONDS>                                        284,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,291
<SALES>                                        522,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               522,434
<CGS>                                          174,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  512,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,104)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (904)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH PALMER.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6418

TALIB ALNUR SPRUILL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00086-CMH)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Talib Alnur Spruill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Talib Alnur Spruill seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Spruill has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                            GUNDERSON DETTMER STOUGH
                      VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGIAN, LLP
                          2700 VIA FORTUNA, SUITE 300
                              AUSTIN, TEXAS  78746
               TELEPHONE (512) 732-8400 FACSIMILE (512) 732-0081


January 31, 2001

Chorum Technologies Inc.
1303 E. Arapaho Road
Richardson, Texas  75081-2444

   Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-1
        ----------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-
49010) originally filed by Chorum Technologies Inc. (the "Company") with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on October 31, 2000, as
thereafter amended or supplemented (the "Registration Statement"), in connection
with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to
8,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock (the "Shares").  The Shares,
which include an over-allotment option granted by certain stockholders of the
Company to the Underwriters to purchase up to 1,200,000 additional shares of the
Company's Common Stock, are to be sold to the Underwriters by the Company as
described in the Registration Statement for resale to the public.  As your
counsel in connection with this transaction, we have examined the proceedings
taken and are familiar with the proceedings proposed to be taken by you in
connection with the sale and issuance of the Shares.

          It is our opinion that the Shares being sold by the Company, when
issued and sold in the manner described in the Registration Statement and in
accordance with the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company, will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

          We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to said
Registration Statement and further consent to the use of our name wherever
appearing in said Registration Statement, including the prospectus constituting
a part thereof, and in any amendment or supplement thereto.

                         Very truly yours,


                         /s/ Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villenueve
                         Franklin & Hachgian, LLP
                         ----------------------------------------
                         Gunderson Dettmer Stough
                         Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Paul M. Zlotoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
Joel Schwartz, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respect, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Paul M. Zlotoff
-----------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer,
General Partner of P.I. Associates Limited Partnership
President & Director of GP P.I. Associated Corp.

/s/ Joel Schwartz
-----------------------------------
Joel Schwartz
Principal Financial Officer of Uniprop, Inc.

August 11, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1320

VICTOR L. TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

JAGRTI COAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(95-1985-BLA)

Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: November 1, 1996

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor L. Taylor, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Gary K.

Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.;

Konstantine Keian Weld, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST

VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the Benefits Review Board's final decision and order denying his claim for benefits under the Black Lung

Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). We

have reviewed the record and the Benefits Review Board's order

affirming the decision of the administrative law judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Benefits Review Board. Taylor v. Director, Office of Workers'

Compensation Programs, No. 95-1985-BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 18, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-30037

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LAVELL STOVALL, also known as Vell Stovall, also known as Lido Stovall,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:12-CR-309-5

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Lavell Stovall has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Stovall has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-30037 Document: 00513308233 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 15-30037

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-30037 Document: 00513308233 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
#### MICHAEL A. QUERQUES AND RONALD BUONOCORE v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 198 *N.J.Super.*566)
Exhibit 8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CAE Inc. (the "Company") is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

I,
Paul G. Renaud, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CAE Inc. and will be retained by CAE Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/PAUL G. RENAUDPaul G. Renaud
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

Date:
August 11, 2004

---



QuickLinks
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# 182nd CES finishes construction rotation at Crow Reservation

              - Published  Aug. 15, 2017
              -                             By Tech. Sgt. Lealan Buehrer & Tech. Sgt. Dawn Rademaker                                                    
              - 182nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**CROW AGENCY, Mont. (AFNS) --  **
Thirty-five Airmen with the Illinois Air National Guard's 182nd Civil Engineer Squadron completed their two-week annual training constructing homes for Crow Tribe veterans Aug. 6, 2017, in Crow Agency, Montana. 

The Peoria-based squadron provided services including drywall, windows, doors, siding, carpentry, plumbing, electrical and HVAC to four partially completed homes, two new homes and 10 remodels. 

“All the homes we’re building right now are all for veterans, so they’ve all served in one of the military services here for us,” said Master Sgt. Ben Reed, the 182nd CES project operation superintendent. “So, this is just a way for us to give back to the community and take care of our veterans in a new spot, in a new location throughout the country.” 

The squadron was one of several units that participated in the Crow Reservation project made possible by the Department of Defense’s Innovative Readiness Training program, a civil-military relations cooperative. 

According to irt.defense.gov, the training initiative supports military readiness while also providing quality services to U.S. communities. 

“It involves taking a unit and providing a training program to go out to local communities to provide a service to the local community and also quality training to our guys,” said Reed. 

The program not only serves as a way to give back to the community, but as a unique training environment. 

“This trip is a huge benefit in terms of civil engineer training. It’s really difficult to get this level of training on station on a weekend basis,” said Chief Master Sgt. Robert Gunther, the 182nd CES chief enlisted manager. “But what really motivates these guys and what really makes them happy is to actually do their job, and this is where they get to do it.” 

The assignment, what Gunther said he considers a humanitarian operation, paralleled the ANG’s mission to be the first choice in homeland operations. 

“Ultimately what we’re trying to do is provide housing for some of the local citizens of the reservation. Hopefully, it’s going to provide housing for six families, and they’re going to be able to enjoy the new homes,” he said. 

The 182nd CES served on the second-to-last rotation. The IRT’s “Montana Crow Tribe Housing 2017” assignment began in May and is scheduled to conclude in August.For more information on the Innovative Readiness Training program, please visit http://irt.defense.gov.

 

CrowApsaalookeNative AmericanIRTInnovative Readiness TrainingveteranhomeconstructionNational Guardcivil engineer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of Devon Energy Corporation of our report dated January
28, 2000, except for Note 2 which is as of October 30, 2000, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Santa Fe Snyder Corporation, which appears
in the Devon Energy Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13,
2000. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
November 15, 2000