alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of
REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RONALD E. RAGLANDRonald E. Ragland Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/    DAVID L. MORASHDavid L. Morash Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




Date: September 15, 2003



26
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2320 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal 

Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2014 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL DANIEL NATHAN DEYARMIN, 

4 JR., POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

6 States Postal Service located at 162 Northeast Avenue in 

7 Tallmadge, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2320 IS

1 ‘‘Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Of2 fice Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Daniel 

7 Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 146 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

          I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, AT&T Wireless Services Note-Backed Series 2002-7 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
          servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
          in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
          based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
          Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 28, 2005


      /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
#### UNITED STATES EX REL. TURNER *v.*GARFIELD.

This case is governed by the decision of the court in *Garfield*v. *United States,*31 App. D. C. 332.

No. 1926.

Submitted March 2, 1909.

Decided April 6, 1909.

*196Appeal by tbe relators from a judgment of tbe Supreme Court of the District of Columbia sustaining a demurrer to and dismissing a petition for the writ of mandamus.

*Affirmed.*

*Messrs. Kappler & Merillat*and *Mr. James K. J ones*for the appellants.

*Mr. George W. Woodruff,*Assistant Attorney General, *Mr. Daniel W. Baher,*United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, *Mr. G. Edward Wright,*Assistant Attorney, Interior Department, and *Mr. F. W. Clements,*First Assistant Attorney, Interior Department, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case, on the same facts and pleadings presented by this appeal, was considered by this court at the April term, 1908, 31 App. D. C. 332.

In the former appeal, the case came here on petition and answer, and demurrer to the answer.. On hearing in the supreme court of the District of Columbia, the demurrer was overruled, and from that ruling a special appeal was taken. We reversed the ruling and remanded- the case for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in our opinion. "When the mandate was filed in the court below, appellants refused to plead over, and elected to stand on their demurrer. Accordingly, a judgment was entered dismissing the action and assessing costs against the petitioner. From this judgment the present appeal is prosecuted.

We find no reason to change or modify our views as expressed in our former opinion. The judgment is therefore affirmed with costs, and it is so ordered. *Affirmed.*

A writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States applied for by the appellant, was allowed May 11, 1909.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MALEAKE THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-93-36, CA-95-131-4-CV-H)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maleake Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. David Paul Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's denial of his motion to

file an out-of-time appeal, which the district court denied on the

ground that Appellant failed to demonstrate good cause for allowing

the late appeal. We dismiss this appeal on an alternate ground.

The district court entered its final order denying Appellant's

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the district

court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997), on March 28, 1997; Appellant's motion to

file a late appeal was filed on November 26, 1997. Pursuant to Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(5), Appellant had thirty days beyond the expiration

of his sixty-day appeal period to file a motion for extension of

time to file his notice of appeal. Appellant's failure to file with

the district court a timely motion for leave to file a late appeal

was fatal to his motion. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal on the ground that Appellant's

motion to file an out-of-time appeal was untimely pursuant to Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(5). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE NINE-MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         590,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  437,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    262,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,354,228
<PP&E>                                       6,339,102
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,117,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,920,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          353,172
<BONDS>                                      2,080,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,739
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,481,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,920,959
<SALES>                                      1,848,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,393,590
<CGS>                                        1,163,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,537,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (44,314)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,930)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,930)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,930)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-12T03:47:59Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-12T03:48:00Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-12T03:48:00Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="18486">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-12T03:47:59Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION t O-6791 - - 
WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. 
</p>
<p>. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


President's Advisory Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood 
Partnerships

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the President's Advisory Council for 
Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: President's Advisory Council for Faith-Based and 
Neighborhood Partnerships Council Meeting.
    Time and Date: Tuesday, February 9th, Times TBD.
    Place: Meeting will be held in person at the White House 
Conference Center, The White House, Washington, DC. Please contact 
Mara Vanderslice for information on times and to RSVP to attend at 
meeting: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d405b4c4349485f5e41444e486d5a45420348425d034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b5aeb9b6bcbdaaabb4b1bbbd98afb0b7f6bdb7a8f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
Conference call line will be available.
    Purpose: The Council brings together leaders and experts in 
fields related to the work of faith-based and neighborhood 
organizations in order to: Identify best practices and successful 
modes of delivering social services; evaluate the need for 
improvements in the implementation and coordination of public 
policies relating to faith-based and other neighborhood 
organizations; and make recommendations for changes in policies, 
programs, and practices.
    Contact Person for Additional Information: Mara Vanderslice at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69b809798929384859a9f9593b6819e99d8939986d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b766d7a757f7e69687772787e5b6c7374357e746b357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Supplementary Information: Please contact Mara Vanderslice for 
more information about how to attend the meeting.
    Agenda: Topics to be discussed include presentation of final 
Council report.

    Dated: January 24, 2010.
Jamison Citron,
Special Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2010-2187 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-103)]


NASA Advisory Council; Science Committee; Meeting.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Science Committee of 
the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Committee reports to the NAC. The 
Meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting from the scientific 
community and other persons scientific and technical information 
relevant to program planning.

DATES: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m., Local Time.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will take place telephonically and by WebEx. 
Any interested person may call the USA toll free conference call number 
888-566-6137, pass code SC2010, to participate in this meeting by 
telephone. International callers may contact Ms. Marian Norris for 
country-specific conference call numbers. The WebEx link is https://nasa.webex.com/, meeting number 998 561 086, and password $CSept28.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4452, 
fax (202) 358-4118, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a272425383823390a242b392b642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="214c4f4e53534852614f4052400f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--Astronomy & Astrophysics Decadal Survey report.
--Cost Containment.
--Program & Subcommittee Updates.
--Open domain publishing pilot program.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate 
the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: August 31, 2010.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration and Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-22117 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 15.7**

 

**CONSENT OF EXPERT**

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name contained in the technical reportentitled Amended National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mineral Reserves Estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study onthe Buckreef Gold Mine Project, Tanzania, East Africa with an effective date June 26, 2018, and reference as an expert containedin the Annual Report of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2018 and incorporatedby reference to the Company’s registration statements on Form F-3 ( SEC File Nos.: 333-213604; 333-213834; and 333-226949).

 

Virimai Projects (Virimai)

 

 /s/Wenceslaus Kuteksatekwa 

 

Dated: November 29, 2018
News United States Air Force
 Air Force hosts military, civilian Workforce SummitPublished Aug. 28, 2017
                        
                        By   Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Manpower, Personnel and Services is hosting the first Workforce Summit at the General Jacob E. Smart Conference Center on Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, Aug. 29-30, 2017.The two-day event is intended for Air Force subject matter experts to examine, discuss and propose solutions to challenges facing the Air Force when it comes to recruiting, developing, retaining and transitioning both military and civilian Airmen. "In order to produce ready, capable and lethal Airmen, our corporate human resources systems must be agile, efficient, consistent and transparent across the talent management life cycle," said Lt. Gen. Gina Grosso, the Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services at Headquarters U.S. Air Force.Attendees will participate in group presentations, discussion panels with subject matter experts and individual breakout sessions. Participants, such as Gen. Stephen Wilson, Air Force vice chief of staff and other senior Air Force leaders, are anticipated to focus on human resources programs and policy challenges pertaining to information technology, civilian hiring, officer performance management and Air Force manpower requirements, among other topics.“Our vision is to create an agile and inclusive talent management enterprise that more deliberately develops people, makes the right decisions at the right time, and helps inform budget and planning decisions,” said Grosso. “This Workforce Summit is an opportunity to focus on a few major gaps in the talent management lifecycle and make decisions for reform with input from senior Air Force leadership.”Air Force 



personnel 



Air Force Senior Leaders 



Airmen 



AF 



recruit 



summit 



services 



civilian 



VCSAF 



workforce 



JB Andrews 



Develop 



retain 



Stephen Wilson 



joint base 



vice chief of staff of the Air Force 



Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Stephen Wilson 



manpower
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7516

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY L. HILL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-39-A, CA-97-695-AM) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Peter Buda, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rodney L. Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hill , Nos. CR-95-39-A; CA-97-695-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED