alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         194,940
<SECURITIES>                                    25,798
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,417
<INVENTORY>                                     46,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,438
<PP&E>                                           9,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 507,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,920
<BONDS>                                          1,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     383,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   507,760
<SALES>                                        128,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,760
<CGS>                                           82,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,111
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 65 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5539]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          WAS CONGRESS IRRESPONSIBLE? THE VOTERS HAVE SAID YES

  Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, as of the close of business yesterday, 
Thursday, April 6, the Federal debt stood at $4,872,967,679,626.75. On 
a per capita basis, every man, woman, and child in America owes 
$18,497.87 as his or her share of that debt.

                          ____________________
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2016

t0525

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2016

152558

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152558

COA: 320629 

Wayne CC: 13-005757-FH

LESLIE WAYNE McGINNIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-104257) on Form S-8 of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries
("Platinum") of our report dated March 21, 2003, relating to the combined
statements of underwriting results and identifiable underwriting cash flows of
The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Reinsurance Underwriting Segment (Predecessor) for
the period from January 1, 2002 through November 1, 2002 and for the year ended
December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report
on Form 10-K of Platinum. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the combined statements are not intended to be a complete
presentation of Predecessor's or The St. Paul Companies, Inc.'s results of
operations or cash flows.

                                                     /s/ KPMG LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 11, 2004
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a- 14(a)



I, Scott A. Fenoglio, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the periods covered by this report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 24, 2017



| | /s/ Scott A. Fenoglio                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | Scott A. FenoglioSenior Vice President, Finance & Planning
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                       
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         567,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     63,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               853,319
<PP&E>                                       1,104,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                 727,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,234,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    560,752
<COMMON>                                         8,501
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,308,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (5,005,578) 
<SALES>                                        961,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               983,777
<CGS>                                          264,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  594,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,435 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 171 (Friday, September 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54232-54233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22018]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on September 
14-15, 2010, in Room 250, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1575 Eye 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. On September 14, the session will begin at 
8:30 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. On September 15, the session will begin at 
8 a.m. and end at 12 noon. This meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters 
pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the 
capability of VA health care facilities and programs to meet the 
medical, psychological, and social needs of older Veterans and 
evaluates VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and 
Clinical Centers.

[[Page 54233]]

    The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's 
geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, 
update on VA's geriatric workforce (to include training, recruitment 
and retention approaches), Veterans Health Administration (VHA) 
strategic planning activities in geriatrics and extended care, recent 
VHA efforts regarding dementia and program advances in palliative care, 
and performance and oversight of the VA Geriatric Research, Education, 
and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide 
written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Marcia Holt-
Delaney, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care (114), Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. 
Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. Holt-
Delaney at (202) 461-6769 or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a072b3829232b640225263e670e2f262b242f330a3c2b642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="410c20332228206f092e2d356c05242d202f24380137206f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 30, 2010.

    By Direction of the Secretary:
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-22018 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2274 

To expedite decisions on applications for authorization to export natural 

gas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2014 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself, Mr. BEGICH, and Ms. HEITKAMP) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To expedite decisions on applications for authorization to 

export natural gas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO EXPORT NATURAL GAS. 

4 (a) DECISION DEADLINE.—The Secretary of Energy 

5 shall issue a decision on any application for authorization 

6 to export natural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas 

7 Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) not later than 90 days after the 

8 later of— 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2274 IS

1 (1) the end of the comment period for the deci2 sion as set forth in the applicable notice published 

3 in the Federal Register; or 

4 (2) the date of enactment of this Act. 

5 (b) JUDICIAL ACTION.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The United States Court of 

7 Appeals for the circuit in which the export facility 

8 will be located pursuant to an application described 

9 in subsection (a) shall have original and exclusive ju10 risdiction over any civil action for the review of — 

11 (A) an order issued by the Secretary of 

12 Energy with respect to the application; or 

13 (B) the failure of the Secretary to issue a 

14 decision on the application. 

15 (2) ORDER.—If the Court in a civil action de16 scribed in paragraph (1) finds that the Secretary 

17 has failed to issue a decision on the application as 

18 required under subsection (a), the Court shall order 

19 the Secretary to issue the decision not later than 30 

20 days after the order of the Court. 

21 (3) EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION.—The Court 

22 shall— 

23 (A) set any civil action brought under this 

24 subsection for expedited consideration; and 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2274 IS

1 (B) set the matter on the docket as soon 

2 as practicable after the filing date of the initial 

3 pleading. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF S.J., A JUVENILE.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

This Change of Control Severance Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of May 7, 2001 (the "Effective Date"), by and between
David L. Morash (the "Employee") and REMEC, Inc. (the "Company"). Certain capitalized terms used in this Agreement are defined in Section 1 below.

R E C I T A L S

A. It is expected that the Company from time to time will consider the possibility of a Change of Control. The Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board")
recognizes that such consideration can be a distraction to the Employee and can cause the Employee to consider alternative employment opportunities.

B.
The Board believes that it is in the best interest of the Company and its Shareholders to provide the Employee with an incentive to continue his employment and to maximize the
value of the Company upon a Change of Control for the benefit of it's shareholders.

C.
In order to provide the Employee with enhanced financial security and sufficient encouragement to remain with the Company notwithstanding the possibility of a Change of Control,
the Board believes that it is imperative to provide the Employee with certain severance benefits upon the Employee's termination of the employment following a Change of Control.

AGREEMENT

In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and the continued employment of Employee by the Company, the parties agree as follows:

1.Definition of Terms.The following terms referred to in this Agreement shall have the following
meanings:



1

---



2.Term of Agreement.This Agreement shall terminate upon the date that all obligations of the parties
hereto under this Agreement have been satisfied.

3.At-Will Employment.The Company and the Employee acknowledge that the Employee's employment is and
shall continue to be at-will, as defined under applicable law. If the Employee's employment terminates for any reason, the Employee shall not be entitled to any payments, benefits, damages, awards or
compensation other than as provided by this Agreement, or as may otherwise be established under the company's then existing employee benefit plans or policies at the time of termination.

4.Change of Control and Severance Benefits.



2

---



5.Successors.



6.Notices.



3

---



7.Arbitration.



4

---



8.Miscellaneous Provisions.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | COMPANY: 
| |  | ---------
| |  | By:      
| |  | Title:   
| |  | EMPLOYEE:

5

---

QuickLinks
News United States Air Force
 MacDill AFB KC-135s reposition in wake of Hurricane IrmaPublished Sept. 8, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Erin McClellan
                        
                        
                        22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, Kan. (AFNS) --**
                McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, welcomed 11 KC-135 Stratotankers assigned to MacDill AFB, Florida, Sept. 7-8, 2017, after they evacuated due to the threat posed by Hurricane Irma.
Irma, which is currently a Category 5 hurricane, threatens a large part of the U.S. East Coast. MacDill AFB is evacuating aircraft as a precaution to ensure no damage.
“The safety of our Airmen and aircraft is paramount,” said Col. April Vogel, 6th Air Mobility Wing commander, MacDill AFB. 
The relocation to McConnell AFB ensures aircraft and aircrews from MacDill AFB are out of harm’s way until they can safely return to their home station, protecting millions of taxpayer dollars.
"As the home of air refueling, we are always ready to assist, whether it's by delivering combat air refueling in the Middle East or providing a safe haven to our brothers and sisters in arms who are fleeing adverse weather,” said Col. Joshua Olson, 22nd Air Refueling Wing commander. “In the past two years, (McConnell AFB) has evacuated its own aircraft twice, and we're happy to be able to return the favor."KC-135 



McConnell AFB 



evacuation 



Stratotanker 



relocation 



MacDill AFB 



6th AMW 



22nd ARW 



repositioning 



hurricane irma
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force releases call to industry for directed energy experimentation as part of flight plan 

              - Published  Sept. 26, 2017
              -                             By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs                                                     

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The Strategic Development Planning and Experimentation office recently released a request for information to industry as part of market research analyses in support of an upcoming experimentation demonstration using directed energy technology to counter unmanned aircraft systems.

 

This experimentation campaign comes at the direction of the Air Force Directed Energy Weapons Flight Plan, signed in May 2017 by the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force.

 

“We identified directed energy as a game-changing technology area in our Air Force strategy and pressed forward with developing a flight plan to define what we needed to do to get from the laboratory to operational capability,” said Dr. Greg Zacharias, Chief Scientist of the Air Force. “Experimentation and prototyping are critical tools to help make this happen.”

 

The Air Force is seeking information regarding the industry capability to provide a directed energy weapons system for targeting group 1 and group 2 unmanned aircraft systems during a counter-UAS operation. The SDPE office is planning the experimentation campaign for fiscal year 2018.

 

“Forward base defense was one of the used cases for directed energy outlined in the flight plan,” said Dr. Michael Jirjis, experimentation campaign program manager. “We’re looking to assess capabilities and maturity of directed energy technologies available today and in the near-term.” 

 

Directed energy weapons, which includes high energy lasers and high power microwaves, can provide the ability to precisely engage targets of interest with little to no collateral impacts and provide protection to Air Force assets that must operate in harm’s way.

 

“Experimentation will be key to the deployment of directed energy weapons, but the required critical thinking will come from all corners of the Air Force, not just scientists and engineers,” said Jirjis. “There will be collaboration from warfighters, planners, logisticians and more.”

 

The request for information can be found at the fedbidopps.gov webpage.

USAFAirmanAirmenStrategic Developmentchief of staff of the Air ForceCSAFSecAFdirected energy experimentationFlight PlancapabilityExperimentationSDPE
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD VERRELLI.

September 17, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elmer's  Restaurants,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 11, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Dennis
R. Miller, Secretary and Corporate Controller of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Elmer's  Restaurants,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Elmer's
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Dennis R. Miller
----------------------------------
Dennis R. Miller
Secretary and Corporate Controller
November 18, 2004
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

CAE Inc. (the“Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 2013 (the “Report”).

I, StéphaneLefebvre, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906of the U.S. Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i)                                                  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                                                the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Stéphane Lefebvre                         

Stéphane Lefebvre

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

 

Date: June 28, 2013
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CEVA, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Chester J. Silvestri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christine Russell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



Date: March 30, 2005

| | /s/CHESTERJ. SILVESTRI                      
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Chester J. Silvestri
Chief Executive Officer
|
| |                                             
| |                                             
| | /s/CHRISTINERUSSELL                         
| | Christine Russell
Chief Financial Officer   
|
#### IN THE MATTER OF LT. CHARLES STOWMAN, CORRECTIONS OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LEESBURG STATE PRISON.

June 25, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.