alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Presidential honor bestowed on AF officerPublished Feb. 13, 2017
                        
                        By Lori A. Bultman
                        
                        
                        25th Air Force
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO–LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                When the President of the United States travels, stateside or abroad, there is an advance team who arrives weeks ahead to handle airport logistics. These team members, or agents, volunteer for the job and are the “best of the best” at what they do. That is why Maj. Francisco "Cisco" Leach, the 25th Air Force deputy chief of safety, felt honored when he was recently selected from 96 agents as the 2016 Presidential Advance Agent of the Year.“Winning the award was a very humbling experience,” Leach said. “The Presidential Advance Agency is composed of some of the sharpest officers in the Air Force; it’s an honor and a privilege to be part of a very special mission.”Being a Presidential Advance Agent is considered an additional duty, which Leach eagerly volunteered to take on.“I applied for the Presidential Advance Agent program shortly after I moved to 25th Air Force in the summer of 2015. I then successfully interviewed and was hired in September 2015,” he said. “This additional duty requires me to go on five to 10 presidential or vice-presidential trips per year,” he said. “Last year, I supported 10 POTUS/VPOTUS trips.”Leach considers his agent assignments a special way to serve his country.“This was a unique opportunity, working for an agency with a ‘no-fail’ mission directly supporting POTUS/VPOTUS travels,” Leach said. “We show up one or two weeks prior to the arrival of the president or vice-president at a destination and coordinate all Air Force One logistics at the airport to ensure a safe arrival and departure.”Leach, a Puerto Rico native, also likes that advance agent assignments allow him to work with numerous embassies and consulates.One of the most important trips Leach made was to Cuba.“It was the first time in 88 years a U.S. president had visited Cuba,” he said. “It was definitely the toughest and most rewarding trip I’ve been to.”In a letter to Leach’s commander, Col. R. Bruce Ybarra, the Presidential Airlift Group commander, expressed his appreciation for Leach’s work on the trip.“He flawlessly coordinated and de-conflicted the arrival and departure of U.S. support aircraft and personnel,” Ybarra wrote. “Maj. Leach and his team battled language barriers, complex security issues, diplomatic clearance concerns and a host of other problems that are associated with nearly a 90-year U.S. absence.“His superior Spanish-language skills proved invaluable, helping multiple White House agencies bridge the wide communication gap and get the mission accomplished. His distinctive performance, positive attitude, and flexibility led to a successful mission and significantly contributed to the safety and security of Air Force One.”25th Air Force 



JB San Antonio-Lackland 



Presidential Advance Agent of the Year award
Exhibit 35.3



LOGO

Subservicer Compliance Statement

Sallie Mae, Inc.

11100 USA Parkway

Fishers, IN 46037

ATTN: Theresa Ouellette

Sallie Mae, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190

ATTN: Trust
Administration

As an officer of ACS Education Services, Inc., a Subservicer of Sallie Mae, Inc hereby certify that:



| | a) | a review of the activities of the Subservicer during the preceding calendar year ending December 31, 2011, and its performance under the FFEL Program Omnibus
Subservicing Agreement (the Servicing Agreement) dated April 9, 2010 between ACS Education Services, Inc., and Sallie Mae, Inc. has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such a review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the annual period ended December 31, 2011, and there have been no known material defaults in the fulfillment of such obligations.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             |  |                         |  |  |  |              
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------
|ACS Education Services, Inc. |  |                         |  | 
|                             |  |                         | 
|By:                          |  | /s/ Meta Gonzalez       |  |  |  | Date: 2-24-12
|Name:                        |  | Meta Gonzalez           |  |  |  |              
|Title:                       |  | Chief Operating Officer |  |  |  |              

ACS Education Services, Inc., A Xerox Company

2277 East 220thStreet Long Beach, CA 90810-1690
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130107 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver (22) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, MARK ALLEN MURDOCK, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 130107 

 COA: 264482 

Wayne CC: 03-320706-CZ 

v 

WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of 

December 28, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the 

order was entered erroneously. 

l0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of
Reebok International Ltd. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:



| |  | /s/KENNETH WATCHMAKERKenneth Watchmaker
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 9, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reebok International Ltd. and will be retained by Reebok International Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information from Trump's Castle Funding,
Inc.  This data has been extracted from the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three month period ended March 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000770618
<NAME> TRUMP'S CASTLE FUNDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             381,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               381,908
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,531
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 515P00

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 385

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 171 (Friday, September 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN: 0648-XY68


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Observer Advisory Committee (OAC) will meet at the Anchorage Hilton 
Hotel, September 28-29, 2010.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 28-29, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Hotel, 500 W. 3rd 
Avenue, Anchorage, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Kimball, Council staff; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
review the public review draft analysis to establish a new program for 
observer procurement and deployment in the North Pacific Groundfish 
Observer Program (i.e., restructuring). The committee will also receive 
a report on an electronic monitoring study in the commercial halibut 
fishery. The agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will 
be posted at http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 
working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 30, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-22009 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 

VYRIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY 

The purpose of this Director Compensation Policy of Vyrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), is to provide a total compensation package
that enables the Company to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high-caliber directors who are not employees or officers of the Company or its subsidiaries. In furtherance of the purpose stated above, all non-employee directors shall be paid
compensation for services provided to the Company as set forth below: 
 Cash Retainers 

 

					
	Annual Retainer for Board Membership:	  			
		
	 Each Non-employee Director:
	  	$	10,000	  
		
	Committee Annual Retainer:	  			
		
	 Chairperson of Audit Committee:
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Chairperson of Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Each Non-chair Member of Audit Committee:
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Each Non-chair Member of Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
	  	$	5,000	  
		
	Meeting Fees:	  			
		
	 Each Meeting Attended In-person:
	  	$	1,500	  
	 Each Meeting Attended Telephonically:
	  	$	500	  

 Equity Awards 

Upon initial election to the Board: An initial, one-time equity grant (the “Initial Grant”) of options to purchase 150,000 shares of common
stock (subject to adjustment based on stock splits, recapitalizations and the like), issued at the market price on the date of the grant to each new non-employee director, that vests annually over three years, provided, however, that all vesting
ceases if the board member resigns from our Board of Directors or otherwise ceases to serve as a director, unless the Board of Directors determines that the circumstances warrant continuation of vesting. This initial equity grant applies only to
non-employee directors who are first elected to the Board effective as of or subsequent to the Company’s initial public offering. Non-employee directors who are first elected as of the Company’s initial public offering will have their
grants issued at the IPO price to the public. 







 Annual equity grants: On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee
member of the Board will receive an annual equity grant (the “Annual Grant”) of common equity options with an aggregate fair market value of $10,000, issued at the market price of the date of the grant that vests on the one year
anniversary of the grant, provided, however, that all vesting ceases if the director resigns from our Board of Directors or otherwise ceases to serve as a director, unless the Board of Directors determines that the circumstances warrant continuation
of vesting. 
 All equity awards will vest in full upon a Sale Event (as defined in the Company’s stock option and grant plan). 

Expenses 
 The Company will reimburse all
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by non-employee directors in attending meetings of the Board or any Committee. 
 Approved April 28,
2014, subject to effectiveness of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 69 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5803]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       EULOGIES FOR THE LATE SENATOR JOHN STENNIS OF MISSISSIPPI

  Mr. KYL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that all Senators 
have until the close of business on May 10, 1995, to submit eulogies 
for our former colleague, the Senator from Mississippi, Mr. Stennis, 
and that at that time eulogies be printed as a Senate document.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
-----------------------------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial
Officer

February 19, 2003
#### Schacht et al. *v.*Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Indianapolis, et al.

[No. 18,795.

Filed March 23, 1956.

Rehearing denied April 17, 1956.

Transferred denied June 5, 1956.]

*Coates & Hatfield,*of Indianapolis, for appellants.

*Tony Foster, James C. Courtney*and *John C. Christ,*of Indianapolis, for appellees.

*544Royse, C. J.

Appellants brought this action for a writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Indianapolis, granting a variance from a Zoning Ordinance of the City of Indianapolis to permit the construction of a drive-in restaurant and sign in the center of a district restricted by ordinance to the construction of single and two-story family dwellings.

The trial court affirmed the decision of the Board granting the variance. From that judgment appellants have appealed to this court.

Appellees have filed their verified motion to dismiss this appeal on the grounds that the question sought to be presented herein became moot. Their motion avers, in part:

> “Since the decision of the lower court, the Common Council of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, has rezoned the specific area in question and the area adjacent thereto for business use through General Ordinance No. 40, passed on the 5th day of December, 1955 and signed by the Mayor of the City of Indianapolis December 6, 1955.

> The appellants have not instituted any proceedings concerning the rezoning of this area by the Common Council of the City of Indianapolis but have by their silence and inaction accepted the effect of the Ordinance.

> The present zoning now includes the business use atttacked by this appeal, therefore, there is no actual controversy for this court to decide.”

Appellants have not filed any answer or response to this motion.

It seems to us under the averments of appellees’ motion the question has become moot. Therefore, appellees’ motion must be sustained. *Buck, et al.*v. *K. G.*
      *545
      *Schmidt Brewing Co., Inc., et al.*(1952), 123 Ind. App. 217, 105 N. E. 2d 823, (Transfer denied); *Mikels*v. *Seligman & Latz of Indianapolis*(1955), 126 Ind. App. 17, 127 N. E. 2d 107 (Transfer denied).

Appeal dismissed.

NOTE. — Reported in 132 N. E. 2d 924.
**EXHIBIT
      10.4**





**PROMISSORY
      NOTE AMENDMENT**





**Dated
      as of June 30, 2006**





**Reference
      is made to that certain promissory note dated August 31, 2000 (the “Promissory
      Note”), as amended, between CenterStaging Musical Productions, Inc., a
      California corporation, (the “Issuer”), promising to pay to Paul Router, Trustee
      under the PREMIER CAREER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
      for
      the Interests of John Guthrie Caswell (“Payee”) with respect to the loan of
      $75,000 at 10% interest per annum. All terms defined in the Promissory Note
      shall have the same meaning in this Amendment, except as otherwise provided
      herein.**





**NOW,
      THEREFORE, Borrower and Holders hereby agree to amend the Promissory Note as
      follows:**





**1)**  **The
      maturity date of the Promissory Note is hereby revised** ***ab
      initio*** **to May 31, 2007. Furthermore, the Payee agrees that the Issuer is not, and
      shall
      not be deemed to be, in default with respect to the original maturity date
      of
      the Promissory Note and the Payee hereby waive any right to demand immediate
      payment of the Promissory Note or any remedies in respect
      thereof.**





**2)**  **Payee
      acknowledges that various payments have been made against the original principal
      amount of $75,000 and that the outstanding balance at June 30, 2006 is
      $50,194.28.**





**2)**  **Except
      as expressly modified herein, the Promissory Note is hereby ratified and shall
      remain in full force and effect.**





**If
      Holders agree with the foregoing, please execute this amendment in the space
      below.**





**/s/
      Howard Livingston**


**Howard
      Livingston**


**CFO
      CenterStaging Musical Productions, Inc.**








**/s/
      John Guthrie Caswell**


**John
      Guthrie Caswell**


**Promissory
      Note Payee, an individual**
#### HAROLD MICKLE v. SELECTED RISKS INSURANCE CO.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL MILLER.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Nov. 13Published Nov. 13, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Robert Kingery
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force Nellis Air Force Base Airmen paint an F-15 Eagle in tribute to Las Vegas, and the secretary of the Air Force and chief of staff of the Air Force interview a NASA astronaut. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Robert Kingery.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- Nellis shows it is Vegas strongSecAF 



CSAF 



NASA 



paint 



astronaut 



Featured Videos 



Las Vegas mass shooting 



F-15Eagle 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force
#### ALFRED N. AREZZO v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### WILBERT LEVINE AND DORIS LEVINE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. AND SUBURBAN CABLEVISION.

May 14, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Order entered October 9, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 20 - 00333 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N .K.C., A CHILD On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 18 - 21825 ORDER Before the Court are appellee’s September 28, 2020 and October 1, 2020 motions for sanctions for omissions and misrepresentation of facts and failure to

serve . Appellee asserts appellant failed to serve her a copy of a motion he filed in August 2020 seeking to extend the time to file his brief and misrepresented and omitted facts in the brief . She ass erts that, as a result, app ellant’s appeal is frivolous. We DENY the motions without prejudice to raising the arguments concerning appellant’s brief in appellee’s brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38

. 2 (a)(B). /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE