alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force announces change to deploymentsPublished Dec. 12, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **Washington (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force announced another milestone under the chief of staff’s number two focus area: Strengthening Joint Leaders and Teams.

Airmen deploying on individual taskings will now deploy in teams of three or more. This move will provide mutual support during the entire deployment continuum. This directive, effectiveNov. 30, 2017,is referred to as “Deployed Teaming.”
****
“Deployed Teaming places a higher value on mutual support and improves our warfighting capability,” said Maj. Gen. Brian Killough, director of Air Force Strategic Plans. “It allows us to be more effective, while increasing resiliency.”

This concept will be comprised of Airmen from the same duty location, deploying to the same location, during the same cycle. Members will accomplish pre-deployment training, travel to and from the area of responsibility and perform reintegration together.

“Our Air Force is working hard to provide Airmen the support structures they need to be successful and resilient for the duration of their deployments,” said Killough.

Team leaders will be appointed to guide and lead their teams during the deployment process. Although Airmen deploying as a part of a team may not be assigned to the same work center, the leads will ensure there is crosstalk and mutual support.

Additional information will be available through Installation Deployment Readiness Cells.deployment 



SecAF 



CSAF 



deployed teaming 



resilience 



strengthening joint leaders and teams 



CSAF Focus Areas 



installation deployment readiness cells 



team
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 135****0,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Digital AngelCorporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2004 (the“Periodic Report”), I, Kevin N. McGrath, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.          The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.          The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 2, 2004 | /s/ Kevin N. McGrath                  |   |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | Kevin N. McGrath                      |
|                               | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               | Digital Angel Corporation             |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 213 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 213

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2013

  Mr. Heller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telephone Excise Tax Elimination Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 33 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking subchapter B.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4293 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
        amended by striking ``chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed 
        by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of chapter 33,'' 
        and inserting ``and chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by 
        sections 4064 and 4121),''.
            (2) Subsection (e) of section 6302 of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 
                ``Communications Services and'',
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``section 4251 
                or'', and
                    (C) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) by striking ``imposed by--'' and all 
                        that follows through ``with respect to'' and 
                        inserting ``imposed by section 4261 or 4271 
                        with respect to'', and
                            (ii) by striking ``bills rendered or''.
            (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``4251, 4261, or 4271'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``4261 or 4271''.
            (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``or'' at the 
                end,
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (C), and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 
                subparagraph (C).
            (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of such Code is 
        amended by striking the item relating to subchapter B.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills first rendered more than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         677,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               949,659
<PP&E>                                       1,101,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                (713,924)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,350,294  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          364,683 
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          560,752      
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,501
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,916,330)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,350,294 
<SALES>                                        541,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               555,443
<CGS>                                          148,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  442,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,767
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,767 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,767
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Digital Angel Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 3, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Kevin N. McGrath, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Periodic Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 3, 2006 |   | /s/ Kevin N. McGrath                  |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Kevin N. McGrath                      |
|                  |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |   | Digital Angel Corporation             |

 

----
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
85-B  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the  period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of Net Lease Management
85-B, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of Net Lease Management
85-B,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              Net Lease Management 85-B, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 10, 2004



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              Net Lease Management 85-B, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 10, 2004
#### RAGAN v. WHEAT FIRST SEC., INC.

No. 478P00

Case below: 138 N.C. App. 453

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.
News United States Air Force
 Celebrating 50 years of the CMSAFPublished April 3, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                In April 1967, Chief Master Sgt. Paul Airey set on a path untraveled by any other Airman in the U.S. Air Force. 
“It was 50 years ago that [Airey] became the first Airman bestowed the honor of being called chief master sergeant of the Air Force,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein during the CMSAF transition ceremony Feb. 17, 2017. “This position would shape how the Air Force grew as the newest service.”
In the early 1960s, Congressman Mendel Rivers issued a bill that mandated the appointment of senior enlisted advisers for all services. Though the bill wasn’t passed, Air Force senior leaders decided to create the CMSAF position.
Then-CSAF Gen. John P. McConnell announced the position in 1967 and explained its criteria and duties, “The man selected to fill this job will be used as a representative of the Airman force when and where this is appropriate, and will serve as a sounding board for ideas and proposals affecting Airman matters.” 
According to the Airmen Memorial Museum, Airey knew the position was not to be taken lightly. 
“I ran into a lot of people who said it was going to be a phony position – there were people who thought that,” Airey said. “There were people who said it was something to placate the enlisted force. There were people who said they wouldn’t have it because it wasn’t going to do what they advertised it as. I couldn’t believe this. I had enough faith in the system ... it was going to be set up in all good faith to do something for the enlisted force, to make it an avenue of communication, to try and make it a better Air Force, which I, to this day, believe the job has accomplished.”  
Since then, only 17 other men have followed in Airey’s esteemed path, yet the impact of these Airmen continuously ricocheted across the force. Over the last five decades, CMSAFs have tackled low retention rates, enhanced professional military education, improved the enlisted promotion system, advocated quality of life initiatives, reinforced the importance of higher education, fought for budget increases and supported joint and coalition operations.
Those improvements may not have been made without Airey taking that first step 50 years ago.
“He was absolutely the right choice to become our first chief master sergeant of the Air Force,” Goldfein said. “He fought for a standardized promotion system and laid the foundation for what would become the professional military education that we know today ... creating American Airmen – our most powerful weapon.”CSAF 



history 



e-9 



chief 



Goldfein 



Wright 



Airey 



CMSAF
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |        June 25, 2008    |   | By:    |        /s/ Brian D. Pflug                                                                                                    |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                        |   |   | Brian      D. PflugSenior      Vice President – Accounting & Finance(Principal      Financial & Accounting Officer) |   |
Exhibit 10.19

 

Amendment to the M30 Contract - DCF HM/SM integrated

 

Amendment to the M30 CDISCOUNT pick-up contract

 

Between

 

The company CDISCOUNT SA, the head office of which is at 120-126 Quai de Bacalan, 33000 Bordeaux, registered under the number 424 059 822 of the commerce and companies register of Bordeaux,

 

Duly represented by Mr. Anil BENARD-DENDE, Director of the BtoB development

 

Hereafter “CDISCOUNT”;

 

And

 

The company DISTRIBUTION CASINO FRANCE SAS, the head office of which is at 1 Esplanade de France, 42000 Saint-Etienne, registered under the number 428 268 023 in the Commerce and Companies Register of Saint Etienne,

 

Duly represented by Mr. [handwritten] Gerald Walter

 

Hereafter the “DCF”;

 

PREAMBLE

 

The Parties concluded a contract for services dated the 1st January 2013 (hereafter the “Contract”).

 

The Parties intend with this amendment to modify certain terms of the Contract under the conditions detailed below.

 

ARTICLE ONE

 

The Parties have decided to modify article 7.1 of the Contract as follows:

 

7.1  PRICING

 

CDISCOUNT shall remunerate DCF €0.45 excl. tax per parcel physically handed over to the recipient client and correctly entered into the parcel tracking IT application.

 

This amount constitutes a unit fee covering a global and definitive character: it covers all the services of DCF and its shops under the title of the Contract. No additional payment shall be made by CDISCOUNT.

 

ARTICLE TWO

 

These modifications take effect as from the 1st January 2013

 

*

 

* *

 

All the other conditions in the Contract remain unchanged and apply in full.

 

Established on the 1st January 2013

 

	
For Cdiscount
    	
For DCF
    
	
[signature]
    	
[signature]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2065

WESLEY LEON BETHEA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DETECTIVE DAVID CHAD ELLIS; DETECTIVE JASON CORPREW; 

OFFICER JESSE EMORY; SERGEANT REGINALD BRANCH; OFFICER 

NORMA RUIZ; DETECTIVE DAVID STANCIL; OFFICER DAVID 

SEAGROVES; OFFICER RUSSELL WINSTEAD; SERGEANT STEVE 

STROUD; WILSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF WILSON; C. BRUCE 

ROSE, Mayor of the City of Wilson; THOMAS P. HOPKINS, Police Chief, City 

of Wilson,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-cv-00178-D)

Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wesley Leon Bethea, Appellant Pro Se. James P. Cauley III, Gabriel Du Sablon, 

CAULEY PRIDGEN, PA, Wilson, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wesley Leon Bethea appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment 

in favor of Defendants on his claim for malicious prosecution. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because 

Bethea’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,

namely that the false statements at issue were not material to the determination of 

probable cause, Bethea has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams 

v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

           AWARENESS LETTER--UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
Dallas, Texas

   We are aware that our report dated May 2, 2001, which was included in the
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2001, is being incorporated by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3.


   We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Regulation C
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of that Act.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas

June 21, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1048666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      76613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1136979
<PP&E>                                          888099
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4549970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           424628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3142243
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3904877
<SALES>                                         924357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                924543
<CGS>                                           314903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   314903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                516759
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  92881
<INCOME-TAX>                                     27967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     64914
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2467

 To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from altering available 
health care and wait times for appointments for health care for certain 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2014

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from altering available 
health care and wait times for appointments for health care for certain 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Care for Veterans Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ALTERING AVAILABLE HEALTH CARE AND WAIT TIMES 
              FOR APPOINTMENTS FOR HEALTH CARE FOR CERTAIN VETERANS.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not alter the hospital care, 
medical services, or other health care available to a veteran who is 
enrolled in the patient enrollment system of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs under section 1705 of title 38, United States Code, or the 
amount of time such veteran is required to wait for an appointment for 
such care or services based solely on the length of time since such 
veteran has last received such care or services from the Department.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OTTAVIO NOVEMBRINO.

July 10, 1985.

Leave to appeal is granted.