alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter H. van Oppen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Advanced Digital Information Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |  |  |                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: June 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ PETER H. VAN OPPEN       
|                    |  |  |  | Peter H. van Oppen, Chair    
|                    |  |  |  | and Chief Executive Officer  
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Ironton Iron, Inc. (the Company) and Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of INTERMET Corporation, which is the owner of all
of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company, hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert E. Belts
Robert E. Belts
May 14, 2003

13
#### Bennett *v.*James H. Drew Corporation

[No. 18,826.

Filed May 1, 1956.

Rehearing denied June 5, 1956.]

*Walter C. Reese,*of Shelbyville, for appellant.

*E. J. Bunny, William B. Weisell*and *Locke, Reynolds, Boyd & Weisell,*of Indianapolis, for appellee.

Royse, C. J.

Appellant has attempted to appeal from an award of the Full Industrial Board of Indiana denying him compensation.

Appellant’s brief was filed in this court on February 29, 1956. Appellee, on April 2, 1956, filed its motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, affirm for the reason appellant’s brief does not comply with Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court in each of the following particulars :

> *5581. The date of the filing of appellant’s application, the designation of a party defendant and the issues created thereby have been omitted; the substance of the appellant’s application for an award is not set out.

> 2. The findings and award of the Hearing Member have been omitted but for the ultimate result in the award.

> 3. It cannot be determined whether the prayer for review by the full Board was filed timely.

> 4. There is no record of the filing in the Appellate Court of an assignment of errors and whether or not it was timely filed.

> 5. There is no showing that a bill of exceptions was approved and made a part of the record. No reference is made to the filing of a bill of exceptions.

An examination of appellant’s brief discloses it does not conform to the Rules. Since the filing of appellee’s motion appellant has not sought permission to cure the defects therein pointed out. Therefore, no question is presented. *Waters et al. v. Perfect Circle Corporation*(1953), 124 Ind. App. 70, 114 N. E. 2d 436.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 133 N. E. 2d 886.
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132366 & (65)(69) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

GUST PAPADELIS, NIKI PAPADELIS, 

TELLY’S GREENHOUSE AND GARDEN 

CENTER, INC., and TELLY’S NURSERY LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees/

Cross-Appellants, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132366 

 COA: 268920 

Oakland CC: 2005-067029-CZ 

CITY OF TROY, MARK STIMAC, and

MARLENE STRUCKMAN, 

Defendants-Appellants/ 

Cross-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REVERSE in part the judgments of the Oakland Circuit Court and the Court of Appeals 

to the extent that they hold that the Right to Farm Act, MCL 286.471 et seq. (RTFA), and 

the State Construction Code, MCL 125.1502a(f), exempt the plaintiffs from the defendant 

city’s ordinances governing the permitting, size, height, bulk, floor area, construction, 

and location of structures used in the plaintiffs’ greenhouse operations. Assuming that 

the plaintiffs’ acquisition of additional land entitled them under the city’s zoning 

ordinance to make agricultural use of the north parcel (a point on which we express no 

opinion, in light of the defendant city’s failure to exhaust all available avenues of appeal 

from that ruling after the remand to the Oakland Circuit Court in the prior action, see City 

of Troy v Papadelis (On Remand), 226 Mich App 90 (1997)), the plaintiffs’ structures 

remain subject to applicable building permit, size, height, bulk, floor area, construction, 

and location requirements under the defendant city’s ordinances. The plaintiffs’ 

greenhouses and pole barn are not “incidental to the use for agricultural purposes of the 

land” on which they are located within the meaning of MCL 125.1502a(f). As no 

provisions of the RTFA or any published generally accepted agricultural and 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

management practice address the permitting, size, height, bulk, floor area, construction, 

and location of buildings used for greenhouse or related agricultural purposes, no conflict 

exists between the RTFA and the defendant city’s ordinances regulating such matters that 

would preclude their enforcement under the facts of this case. We REMAND this case to 

the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. In all 

other respects, the applications are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0626 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Order filed, May 11, 2022.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-22-00287-CR

STEPHEN CHARLES HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 207th District Court

Comal County, Texas

Trial Court Case CR2016-726

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 2, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order Frances Janezic, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
News United States Air Force
 CCAF no longer required for promotionPublished Oct. 24, 2018
                        
                        By Senior Airman Grace Nichols
                        
                        
                        19th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, Ark. (AFNS) --**
                Due to an update to the enlisted personnel handbook, an associate’s degree from the Community College of the Air Force is no longer required for promotions, however, master sergeants still have to keep education in mind for their enlisted performance reports.
While the CCAF itself is no longer required, an associate’s degree or higher is mandatory for promotion to senior master sergeant, according to the revised Air Force Handbook 36-2618, The Enlisted Force Structure.
For master sergeant EPR’s, the CCAF block will now be marked "yes" if an Airman has been conferred for an associate or higher degree from a regionally or nationally accredited institution prior to the static closeout date. Revisions will be made to AFI 36-2406 Officer and Enlisted Evaluation System, and AF Form 911.
The change in degree requirements may help enlistees coming into the service with credits or completed degrees from the civilian world receive proper education recognition. It may also help those who want to pursue degree programs outside the Air Force during their time in the service.MPF 



military personnel flight 



Air Force Handbook 36-2618 



The Enlisted Force Structure 



AFI 36-2406 Officer and Enlisted Evaluation System 



AF Form 911 



CCAF 



SMSgt 



promotion 



EPR 



Community College of the Air Force
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                        96
<INVENTORY>                                      2,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,246
<PP&E>                                          34,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,402
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,808
<SALES>                                         12,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,506
<CGS>                                           13,824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Canbiola, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley L. Teeple,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                   
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:
    April 16, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Stanley L. Teeple  
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------
|                         |     | Stanley
    L. Teeple      
|                         |     | Chief
    Financial Officer



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6193

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEMONT CHRISTOPHER BLUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:97-cr-00131-JRS; 3:06-cv-00012-JRS)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 31, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demont Christopher Blue, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell

Wallace, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Demont C. Blue seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of his constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Blue has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 2 for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of China Health Resource, Inc., f/k/a Voice
Diary Inc. (“CHRI”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chen, Jiang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date:
March 5, 2009
 
 
 
 /s/ Chen,
Jiang
 Chen,
Jiang
 Chief
Executive Officer
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
CHRI and will be retained by CHRI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing by CDEX, Inc. (the "Company") of its Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended October 31, 2008 (the "Report") I, Malcolm
H. Philips, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:


     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of CDEX, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CDEX, Inc. and will be retained by CDEX, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


 /s/ Malcolm H. Philips, Jr.
----------------------------
Malcolm H. Philips, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer



Date: March 12, 2009
Exhibit 35.3



|     |  |                           
|---- |  | --------------------------
|LOGO |  | ACS is now a Xerox company

Subservicer Compliance Statement

Sallie Mae, Inc.

11100 USA Parkway

Fishers, IN 46037

ATTN: Theresa Ouellette

Sallie Mae, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190

ATTN: Trust
Administration

As an officer of ACS Education Services, Inc., a Subservicer of Sallie Mae, Inc hereby certify that:



| | a) | a review of the activities of the Subservicer during the preceding calendar year ending December 31, 2011, and its performance under the FFEL Program Omnibus
Subservicing Agreement (the Servicing Agreement) dated April 9, 2010 between ACS Education Services, Inc., and Sallie Mae, Inc. has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such a review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the annual period ended December 31, 2011, and there have been no known material defaults in the fulfillment of such obligations.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                  |  |      |  |  |  |       |  |        
|--------------------------------- |  | ---- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -------
|ACS Education Services, Inc.      |  |      |  |  |  |      
|                                  |  |      |  | 
|By:                               |  | LOGO |  |  |  | Date: |  | 2-24-12
|                                  |  |      | 
|Name:  Meta Gonzalez              |  |      |  |  |  |      
|Title:    Chief Operating Officer |  |      |  |  |  |      

ACS Education Services, Inc., A Xerox Company

2277 East 220thStreet Long Beach, CA 90810-1690