alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 8

- BG

- 2 8 6

IN RE JAMES B. RUDOLPH

201 8 D DN 19

A M ember of the Bar of the

Distri ct of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg istration No. 3 84848

BEFORE: Thompson and Beckwith

, Associate Judge s

, and Farrell

, Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED

– May 3, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of California

suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of

six months , stayed in favor of a one

- year probationary period ; this court’s April 3,

2018, order directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be

imposed; and the joint response consenting to reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that James B. Rudolph i s hereby suspended from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months

, stayed in favor of a one

year period of probation

.

PER CURIAM
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 6, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00023

- CV

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellant

v.

Express Limousines, Inc. n/k/a Groovy Automotive I, Inc., and Charles Delmonico, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND TRIANA

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on December 13, 2018.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the

motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be gra nted. Therefore, the Court grants the

motion and dismisses the appeal

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in

this Court and in the court below.
### The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00504

- CR

Roberto ROSAS, JR., Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. 13

- CRS

- 256 Marisela Saldana, Judge Presiding

ORDER The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on January 10, 2014 . Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on February 10, 2014

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(1). Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until July 18, 2014.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal m ay be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allo wed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id

. Having review ed the record, appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no motion for extension of time was filed . It is therefor e ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within two weeks from the date of this order why th i s appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 1 See id .; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out

- of

- time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

1 We also note t he tria l court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification tha t shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHESTER DAVIS.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 83093 

# FILE

No. 83267 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DARREL D. SMITH, DECEASED. SUN H. HOLDEN, Appellant,

vs. GERRARD COX LARSEN, Respondent. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DARREL D. SMITH, DECEASED. SUN H. HOLDEN, Appellant,

vs. GERRARD COX LARSEN, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 83267 AND

REINSTATING BRIEFING Docket No. 83093 is an appeal from an order adjudicating and enforcing an attorney's lien and compelling partial distribution of the estate. Docket No. 83267 is an appeal from a postjudgment order denying a motion for rehearing and reconsideration of that same order. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge.

Because this court has consistently held that no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reconsideration, this court entered an order directing appellant to show cause why the appeal in Docket No. 83267 should not be dismissed. Appellant has responded and argues that under this court's decision in AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010), this court should consider the motion to be appealable as a tolling motion. This court does consider the motion to be a timely filed



## 1--

- 34 33 8 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0ilLl7A.95/46m

, 3 . - - „ - ::"tolling motion, and therefore, the notice of appeal in Docket No. 83093 from

the original order adjudicating and enforcing the attorney lien and compelling partial distribution of estate, filed after the filing of the motion for reconsideration but before this court dismissed the appeal as premature, is timely pursuant to NRAP 4(a)(6). However, that does not equate to the order denying reconsideration being independently appealable. See Arnold v. Kip, 123 Nev. 410, 417, 168 P.3d 1050, 1054 (2007) ([A]n order denying reconsideration is not appealable."), disapproved of on other grounds by AA Primo Builders). The appeal in Docket No. 83267 is dismissed. This appeal will proceed as to Docket No. 83093, and the briefing schedule is reinstated as follows. Appellant shall have 60 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1).

It is so ORDERED. 

# 9
1400 1 baa ll.. "7

1 J. arraguirre

J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Eleissa C. Lavelle, Settlement Judge Law Office of George E. Cromer Gerrard Cox Larsen Eighth District Court Clerk J. Silver

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) POO?. aggro 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT KNIGHT.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elmer's  Restaurants,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  January 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce
N.  Davis,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Elmer's  Restaurants,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Elmer's
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ BRUCE N. DAVIS
-------------------------------------
Bruce N. Davis
Chief Executive Officer and President
February 22, 2005
News United States Air Force
 AF extends Health Professions Loan Repayment ProgramPublished July 27, 2017
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Application packages for the Air Force’s Health Professions Loan Repayment Program will now be accepted until Sept. 1, 2017. Active-duty Biomedical Sciences Corps and Nurse Corps officers are eligible to apply. 
  
HPLRP provides an incentive for current active-duty medical personnel to extend their active duty commitment through the repayment of professional educational loans, provided they are in the selected career fields and otherwise eligible.
 
“We want our people to be able to balance their commitment to serve their country and support their families,” said Maj. Connie Converse, a Biomedical Sciences Corps utilization officer at the Air Force Personnel Center. “This initiative helps alleviate some of the financial burden of student loans, instilling greater confidence about their futures and allowing greater flexibility for families.”
 
The maximum loan repayment is $40,000 per year for up to two years, minus about 28 percent in federal income taxes, which are taken out prior to lender repayment. 
“The loan repayment counts as income,” Converse said. “We encourage officers with questions about the tax effects to consult with their tax expert prior to applying for the program.” 
Repayment may consist of loan amounts for principal, interest and reasonable educational and living expenses, and are sent directly to the lending institution on behalf of the HPLRP participant. 
Officers may use HPLRP to repay any qualified loans obtained for their qualifying degree that allows them to hold their Air Force Specialty Code. 
“The Air Force Officer Classification Directory on myPers is the source document that provides the type of qualifying degree the member requires in order to obtain their commission,” Converse said. “The expense to obtain that degree is what the Air Force considers eligible debt for this program.” 
The service commitment for HPLRP is a minimum of two years, Converse said. 
Find additional information about the application requirements and process on myPers. Select “Active Duty Officer” from the dropdown menu and search “HPLRP.”
 
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.AFPC 



MyPers 



science 



Biomedical 



taking care of people 



MDG 



JB San Antonio-Randolph 



loan repayment 



health professionals
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**




Certifications





I,
      Zhong,
      Ying, Chief Financial Officer certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Voice Diary, Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and





Date:
      April 11, 2007








/s/
      Zhong, Ying


Zhong,
      Ying
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1295
<SECURITIES>                                      8067
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14128
<PP&E>                                            5971
<DEPRECIATION>                                     228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4883
<BONDS>                                           1011
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1743
<PREFERRED>                                        305
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       11928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19871
<SALES>                                           6190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6190
<CGS>                                             4937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (883)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   3078
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements No. 333-174444 on Form S-8, of our reports dated April 19, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd., and its subsidiaries, variable interest entities and variableinterest entities’ subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, and for the yearsended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regardingthe Group’s adoption of the authoritative guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income), and the effectiveness ofthe Group’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Qihoo 360 TechnologyCo. Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China

April 19, 2013
Order entered October 12, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00681-CV

RAUL NANEZ RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

EZRA CLIFTON WELCH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-01851

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s October 10, 2016 motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this 

order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
News United States Air Force
 ANG provides aerial imagery support for Southern California firesPublished Dec. 14, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Tristan D. Viglianco
                        
                        
                        9th Reconnaissance Wing Public Affairs
                **BEALE AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS)  --**
                Air National Guard members from the 195th Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Group at Beale Air Force Base are providing aerial imagery support to fire departments battling fires in Southern California.
The 163rd Air Attack Wing is providing video of the Thomas Fire to the 195th ISRG by utilizing an MQ-9 Reaper.
“We are using full-motion video from the MQ-9 to map the fire lines and look at fire expansion and progression,” said Maj. Nicholas Edwards, 222nd Intelligence Support Squadron director of incident awareness and assessment. “We have a liaison in place with all of the fire chiefs so we can provide them with up to date information.”
The imagery they are analyzing allows fire crews to be more efficient in combating and staying ahead of the fire.
“Having an asset in the air providing persistent observation is key to fulfilling the incident commanders needs and crucial in identifying emerging active fire behavior,” said Master Sgt. Jason Tyler, 234th Intelligence Squadron chief of incident awareness and assessment. “It allows fire departments to get ahead of it and take appropriate actions such as evacuating areas which the fire may effect.”
The analysts at Beale AFB are able to watch the video from the MQ-9 thanks to a team deployed to the affected region.
“Right now, we have a communication team down there who set up antennas and are relaying the signal back to us,” Edwards said. “The signal travels from the aircraft to the ground station and they send it to us via satellite dish.”
In addition to the observation and ground support, the analysts are also performing damage assessment.
“We help out with damage assessment by getting the number of destroyed structures out quickly using satellite imagery and comparing it to imagery from the sensored aircraft,” Tyler said. “Getting the numbers allows affected counties to get aid they need whether it's from a federal source or state agencies.”
According to the California department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the Thomas Fire has destroyed more than 950 structures and burned approximately 242,000 acres.
“We have been working this fire since last Tuesday (Dec. 5, 2017) and have been working 24-hour operations since then,” Edwards said. “We want to do everything we can. This is why we join the Guard to help out our community and our state.”fire 



wildfire 



MQ-9 



Beale AFB 



195th ISRG 



195th Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance Group 



Thomas fire 



222nd Intelligence Support Squadron 



163rd Air Attack Wing 



Air National Guard
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

                  Computation of Net (Loss) Income per Share
                  Years Ended August 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
                     (In thousands, except per-share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         2000           1999          1998
                                                         ----           ----          ----
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>           <C>
Average common shares outstanding..................        6,046         5,714          5,614
Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
   treasury stock method...........................           --           218            364
                                                        --------       -------       --------
       Total common and common equivalent shares...        6,046         5,932          5,978
                                                        ========       =======       ========
Net (loss) income..................................     $ (7,608)      $   729       $  4,760
                                                        ========       =======       ========
Net (loss) income per share........................     $  (1.26)      $  0.12       $   0.80
                                                        ========       =======       ========
</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Thunderbirds pilot identifiedPublished April 6, 2018
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Air Force Air Demonstration Squadron Slot Pilot Thunderbird 4, Maj. Stephen Del Bagno, was killed when his F-16 Fighting Falcon crashed over the Nevada Test and Training Range April 4, 2018, at approximately 10:30 a.m. during a routine aerial demonstration training flight.
“We are mourning the loss of Major Del Bagno,” said Brig. Gen. Jeannie Leavitt, 57th Wing commander. “He was an integral part of our team and our hearts are heavy with his loss. We ask everyone to provide his family and friends the space to heal during this difficult time.”
An investigation is being conducted into the cause of the mishap.
The team’s participation at the March Air Reserve Base “The March Field Air & Space Expo” has been cancelled. It is unknown how this accident will impact the remainder of the 2018 Thunderbirds Season.f-16 



crash 



Fighting Falcon 



pilot 



Thunderbirds 



Nevada Test and Training Range 



57TH WING 



identified 



nellis afb