alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| ·   | a      $100,000 annual retainer to be paid to each Nonemployee Director in cash,      quarterly in arrears; |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | a      $75,000 additional annual retainer to be paid to Dan R. Carmichael in      cash, quarterly in arrears, for his service as the Chairman of the Board      and the Chairman of the GovernanceCommittee; |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | a      $45,000 additional annual retainer to be paid to the Chairman of the Audit      Committee in cash, quarterly inarrears; |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | a      $25,000 additional annual retainer to be paid to the Chairman of the      Compensation Committee in cash, quarterly in arrears;  and |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | an      annual grant under the Company’s 2006 Share Incentive Plan to each      Nonemployee Director of restricted share units with a fair market value of      $50,000 to be made at each Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of      the Company, with the terms set forth in the Form of Nonemployee Director      Share Unit Award Agreement previously filed with the Securities and      Exchange Commission. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 66 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5568]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      THE DEATH OF RICHARD E. CURL

  Mr. SPECTER. Mr. President, our Nation lost a valuable member of its 
national security team recently, when Richard E. Curl died at the age 
of 77. Dick Curl was Director of the Office of Intelligence Resources 
in the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research. He was 
not the former Director, not the retiring Director, but very much the 
active Director of that office, even at the age of 77.
  Dick Curl devoted his life to intelligence. He served as a naval 
intelligence officer in both World War II and the Korean war, and with 
the State Department between those wars. And Dick began his work for 
INR in 1952. Overall, he gave his country over half a century of 
service.
  Mr. Curl's obituary states that his work ``involved contact with 
various foreign intelligence services as well as U.S. intelligence 
agencies.'' Suffice it to say that his role was often that of a 
mediator between the two different cultures, explaining the uses of 
intelligence to policymakers and Foreign Service officers while also 
ensuring that the risks and benefits of intelligence operations were 
weighed in light of broader U.S. policy interests that might be 
affected if something went wrong. Much of Dick Curl's career was spent 
teaching the policy and intelligence communities to listen to each 
other.
  The staff of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence knew Mr. 
Curl since at least the early 1980's. They found him a valuable source 
of information and good counsel. Dick Curl will be missed by both the 
committee and his country.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 AF upgrades to Windows 10Published Feb. 13, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                In accordance with the Department of Defense mandate, the Air Force must complete the Microsoft Windows 10 migration by March 31, 2018. Any operating system not upgraded by the deadline will be denied access to the network.
Windows 10 is not compatible with many systems currently in the Air Force inventory, resulting in the need to replace a significant number of computer hardware. 
To minimize downtime during the migration, users should take the following steps:
1)	Manually back up their data to a shared drive or DVD discs
2)	Make a list of any special computer software or hardware the technician will need to install
3)	Be patient, the upgrade will take 1-2 hours to complete
“The Windows 10 migration is critical to Air Force readiness,” said Lt. Col. Brian Snyder, Windows 10 lead action officer, cyberspace strategy and policy. 
“It introduces a number of new security features; making it the most secure Windows version to date. Additionally, base and organizational leadership must ensure communication/cyber squadrons are provided all the support and availability necessary to guarantee success.”
The security features allow software patches to install faster, making it less obtrusive to Airmen while its ability to counter emerging cyber intrusion makes the networks safer. This will have a positive security impact on the protection of DoD and special access programs, mission systems, as well as strategic, tactical, and research, development, testing and evaluation systems.
“In cyberspace...every Airman is an operator. They need to be aware of cyber threat and do their part by being prepared for the Win10 migration,” said Bill Marion, deputy chief, information dominance and deputy chief information officer. “The long term benefit is not just about defending the Air Force against the cyber threat, but having a reliable and capable computer to accomplish the mission.”
Airmen can access Microsoft Windows 10 training, tips and features here. 
View the DoD CIO Migration Memo here.Windows 10 



upgrade 



technology 



software 



SecAF 



SAF 



computer 



migration 



network 



security 



communications 



cyber
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         131,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    105,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               265,686
<PP&E>                                         142,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          683,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,844
<COMMON>                                        25,176
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881,569
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  688,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (658,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (658,389)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        



</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Application window open for 14th Annual DoD David O. Cooke AwardPublished Nov. 22, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alexx Pons
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials are seeking nominations for the 14th annual Department of Defense David O. Cooke Excellence in Public Administration Award.
This award was created to promote, perpetuate and recognize the type of exceptional contributions David O. Cooke made to the federal service.
Cooke had a career that spanned more than 55 years, 45 of which were with the DoD. He was widely recognized as a public official promoting a cooperative spirit among leadership and improving operations.
This award recognizes non-managerial career civilian employees with three to 10 years of civilian federal career service as of Dec. 31, 2017. Nominees can be serving in any functional area and will be evaluated on their commitment to public service and demonstration to personal and professional integrity.
Organizations and base-level personnel must contact their major command, combatant command, field operating agency or direct reporting unit for applicable suspense dates and additional information regarding nomination procedures.
Each MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA and DRU may submit one nomination. Completed nomination packages are due to the Air Force’s Personnel Center by Feb. 9, 2018. Specific eligibility and application procedures are available via myPers on a common access card-enabled computer. Select “any” from the dropdown menu and search “Cooke.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions.AFPC 



Air Force Personnel Center 



award 



David Cooke 



Excellence in Public Administration 



federal service 



leadership 



integrity 



civilian 



nomination
**EXHIBIT
      31**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





I,
      Matthew W. Shankle, certify that:





1.  I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advance Display
      Technologies, Inc.;





2.  Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  I
      am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      small business issuer and I have:





(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation;





(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and





5.  I
      have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business
      issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
      financial reporting.





Date:  May
      14, 2007





/s/
      Matthew W.
      Shankle


Matthew
      W. Shankle


President,
      Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 30688 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
TROY LYNN FORD, also known as White Boy , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:03

- CR

- 10014

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Troy Lynn Ford has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ford h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-30688 Document: 00512540349 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 30688

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-30688 Document: 00512540349 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
EXHIBIT
99.5





CONSENT OF EXPERT








Reference is made to the feasibility study entitled
“Feasibility Study and Technical Report Update on the
Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” with an effective date of
June 19, 2014 (the “Report”).





I, Harold Rolf Schmitt, P. Geo, on behalf
ofERM Rescan
(the
“Company”), consent to the use of the Company’s
name and references to the Report, and to the inclusion or
incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report,
in (i) Pretium Resources
Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December
31, 2016 and (ii) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Registration
Statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-211073) and Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-203409 and 333-213450) filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.








Very truly yours,








/s/
Harold Rolf Schmitt, P. Geo





March
30, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7291

STEVEN LAMONT JOEL SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DR. MOORE, Assistant Warden; DEBORAH G. WOODSON, Sec/Supervisor; V. JONES; VIRGINIA B.

THEISEN; B. HARRIS; D. GRAHAM; ALTON BASKERVILLE; CAPTAIN ROWLETT; R. BEDWELL; SGT. COLEMAN; LIEUTENANT THOMAS; W. P. ROGERS; RONALD

J. ANGELONE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden; SERGEANT MILLING;

LIEUTENANT GREGORY; SGT. RICHARDSON; CAPTAIN

JONES; CAPTAIN ARTIS; MARK L. EARLEY, Attorney

General of Virginia,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-00-272-AM)

Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
* To the extent that the district court held that Scott failed

to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101 - 12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 2000), we affirm.

We do not express an opinion concerning the constitutionality of

the ADA as applied to state prisons.

2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Lamont Joel Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lamont Joel Scott appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.* Scott v. Moore, No. CA-00-272-AM

(E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2000; entered Aug. 2, 2000). We deny

Scott’s motion for general relief and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued January 19, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00749-CV

———————————

MICHAEL P. HOLLAND, Appellant

V.

ROBERT TORRES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2020-44198

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael P. Holland, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, 

Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and 
2

Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 

(Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On November 7, 2022, appellant was notified that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not 

established, by December 7, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did 

not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Countiss and Rivas-Molloy.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OBIE LEE DICKEY.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD HIGHTOWER.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
       
<CAPTION>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                  313
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                            27
<ALLOWANCES>                              5
<INVENTORY>                             494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,120
<PP&E>                                8,000
<DEPRECIATION>                        2,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   765
<BONDS>                               2,549
<COMMON>                                  1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               5
<OTHER-SE>                            2,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,839
<SALES>                                 740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        888
<CGS>                                   757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       36  <F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          57
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      57
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                             57
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .55
<FN>
<F1> Net of interest income, $9 million, and capitalized interest, $6 million
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.7

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rick Mangat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: March 22, 2017 |   | /s/ Rick Mangat                       |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Rick Mangat                           |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 99.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the Company) on for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Purcell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen Purcell                    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Stephen Purcell Chief
Financial Officer