alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 23, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (the Act”), Sensory System for Critical Infrastructure Defect Recognition, Visualization and Failure Prediction ('Sensory System”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its members. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Louisiana Tech University Research Foundation, Ruston, LA, has been added as a party to this venture. Also, UltraScan, LLC, Ruston, LA, has withdrawn as a member to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Sensory Systems intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 14, 2009, Sensory System filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 15, 2009 (74 FR 28277).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-22217 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer **

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|                                     |                                                |                                             |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                           |                                        |
| Date: October              10, 2006 | By:                                       | /s/ Jay              O.              Wright |
|                                     | Jay              O. Wright, Chief Executive Officer |

|                                     |                                                                                   |                                   |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                                              |                              |
| Date: October              10, 2006 | By:                                                                          | /s/ Richard              H. Deily |
|                                     | Richard              H. Deily, Principal Financial and Accounting              Officer |
EX-10.71



 Exhibit 10.71 
  

					
		 		 	April 3, 2014

 Ms. Jodie Simon Friedman 

c/o Kid Brands, Inc. 
 Dear Jodie: 

As approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Kid Brands, Inc. (the “Company”), and as discussed, this
letter serves to confirm the following: 
 Equity Award: On March 21, 2014, you were awarded 25,000 stock appreciation rights (SARs) under the
Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, with a five-year vest and a ten-year life. 
 Severance: The
Severance provision of our letter dated March 26, 2013 (and executed by you on April 20, 2013) pursuant to which Kid Brands, Inc. extended an offer of employment to you as Vice President and General Counsel has been modified to replace
“three months” with “six months”. 
 Thank you for your ongoing contributions to the success of our Company. 

 

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ Raphael Benaroya
	
	Raphael Benaroya
	Chairman, President and CEO
	Kid Brands, Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.3

**EXECUTION VERSION**

****AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO****
****SERIES 2001-1 SUPPLEMENT****

        This AMENDMENT NO. 3 dated as of July 23, 2003 (this“Amendment”), is by and among H&T RECEIVABLE FUNDINGCORPORATION, as Transferor (the “Transferor”), BALLY TOTALFITNESS CORPORATION, as Servicer (the “Servicer”) and JP MORGANCHASE BANK (the “Trustee”). 

W I T N E SS E T H

        **WHEREAS**, the entities party hereto are parties to that certain Series2001-1 Supplement to Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 16,1996 (as amended, amended and restated and otherwise modified from time to time,the “Series 2001-1 Supplement”); and 

        **WHEREAS**, the parties hereto desire to amend the Series 2001-1 Supplement.

        **NOW THEREFORE**, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt andsufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree asfollows: 

        A.       *Definitions*. As used herein, capitalizedterms used herein and not otherwise defined are used as defined in (or byreference in) the Series 2001-1 Supplement or, if not defined therein, in theCertificate Purchase Agreement (as defined in the Series 2001-1Supplement).

        B.      *Amendment to Series 2001-1 Supplement*.The definitions of “Commitment Amount”and “Partial AmortizationPeriod Commencement Date” as set forth in Section 2 of the Series2001-1 Supplement are hereby amended and restated in their entirety to read asfollows:
News United States Air Force
 McConnell AFB innovation saves $40K, increases safetyPublished Sept. 13, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Erin McClellan
                        
                        
                        22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                
                The 22nd Logistics Readiness Squadron’s vehicle management flight recently constructed and installed a modification on a vehicle to enhance the safety of McConnell Air Force Base Airmen while saving the Air Force thousands of dollars.
The nine-ton high-lift truck is used for loading cargo into the KC-135 Stratotanker, and will also be used with the KC-46 Pegasus after its arrival. Until now, the tailgate of the trucks, where Airmen stand while moving the cargo, posed a fall risk. 
“The 22nd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron came to us, and they wanted railings added to make the nine-ton high-lift safer,” said 1st Lt. Claryn Stewart, 22nd LRS vehicle management flight commander.
To solve the problem, railings were welded to the sides of the tailgate. To ensure the aircraft wouldn’t be damaged, rubber bumpers were also added. 
“We have three of them here, and we’ll be getting three more with the new KC-46 coming in, so we’ll do a total of six trucks for them,” said Stewart. “The number one priority is safety and taking care of our people.”
In the end, 22nd LRS personnel will save the base approximately $40,000 by building the railings instead of purchasing them. Each truck will cost $300 to fix, versus the projected $7,000 each.
“The Occupational Safety and Health Administration-approved railings that we could buy downtown were thin and flimsy,” said Jerry Gentry, 22nd LRS vehicle management technician, who helped design and produce the railings. “(We used) the same material they use to make roll cages for racecars. They’re built to exceed OSHA standards.”McConnell AFB 



innovations 



safety 



AMC 



22nd LRS 



KC-135 



KC-46 



Trucks 



cargo 



OSHA
- 132 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

297 Nebraska Reports

FARMERS CO-OP v. STATE

Cite as 297 Neb. 132

Farmers Cooperative, a cooperative corporation

organized under the laws of the State of

Nebraska, appellant, v. State of

Nebraska et al., appellees.

Frontier Cooperative Company, a cooperative

corporation organized under the laws of the

State of Nebraska, appellant, v. State of

Nebraska et al., appellees.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed July 7, 2017. Nos. S-16-312, S-16-313.

supplemental opinion

Appeals from the District Court for Lancaster County: 

Andrew R. Jacobsen, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former 

opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Thomas E. Jeffers and Andrew C. Pease, of Crosby Guenzel, 

L.L.P., for appellants.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and L. Jay Bartel for 

appellees.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller‐Lerman, Cassel, Kelch, 

and Funke, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Cases Nos. S-16-312 and S-16-313 are before this court on 

the appellees’ motion for rehearing concerning our opinion 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

08/11/2017 12:09 AM CDT
- 133 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

297 Nebraska Reports

FARMERS CO-OP v. STATE

Cite as 297 Neb. 132

in Farmers Co‐op v. State.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we 

modify the original opinion as follows:

(1) We withdraw the last two sentences in the paragraph 

preceding the subheading “(b) Frontier’s Refund Claims” 

and substitute the following: “Farmers appealed the Tax 

Commissioner’s decision to the district court for Lancaster 

County.”2

(2) We withdraw the last two sentences in the paragraph 

preceding the subheading “(c) District Court’s Decisions” 

and substitute the following: “Frontier appealed the Tax 

Commissioner’s decision to the district court for Lancaster 

County.”3

(3) We withdraw the second to the last sentence in the 

second paragraph under the subheading “3. The Cooperatives

Failed to Establish They Were Entitled to Refund of Taxes

Denied by Tax Commissioner” and substitute the following: 

“Neither of the Cooperatives requested a formal hearing from 

the Department prior to the Tax Commissioner taking action 

on their refund claims, so no additional evidence was developed on the record regarding the denied claims.”4

 And we 

withdraw the last sentence of that same paragraph, which 

stated, “Further, the Cooperatives did not submit any additional evidence to the district court on its appeal.”5

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

 Motion for rehearing overruled.

Stacy, J., not participating.

1 Farmers Co‐op v. State, 296 Neb. 347, 893 N.W.2d 728 (2017).

2 Id. at 351, 893 N.W.2d at 733.

3 Id. at 352, 893 N.W.2d at 734.

4 Id. at 364, 893 N.W.2d at 740.

5 Id.
#### GREEN BROOK, INC. v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GREEN BROOK.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Charles Edward BASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia Ann BASS, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 34509.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District.

March 6, 1973.

Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied April 6, 1973.

Shaw & Howlett, Keith W. Hazelwood, Terry I. Flanagan, Clayton, for plaintiff-appellant.

Daniel W. Brown, Daniel P. Reardon, Jr., St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.

*26DOWD, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of plaintiff’s motion to modify a divorce decree which asked that the custody of a four year old child be transferred to plaintiff. The court denied the motion and plaintiff appealed.

On August 24, 1970 plaintiff was granted a decree of divorce and the defendant-mother was awarded custody of their child. Plaintiff was granted reasonable rights of visitation including custody of the child for one month during the summer vacation each year. At the time of the divorce decree, defendant and the child resided in Florida, and the order included a provision that defendant pay for the child’s trip to Missouri each year.

This court stated in Smith v. Smith, 435 S.W.2d 684 (Mo.App.1968), at 685:

> “ * * * The decision of a trial court in custody matters, when tested by appeal, comes weighted with the inference that the court has properly exercised its judicial discretion in determining the best interests of the child, and unless such discretion has been abused, or unless we can point to some reason for not deferring to the findings of the trial court or, of course, unless this court is convinced that the welfare of the child requires some other disposition, the decree should not be disturbed.”

The movant must plead and prove such a change of conditions that the welfare and best interests of the child will be served by granting a modification. Wood v. Wood, 378 S.W.2d 237, 239 (Mo.App.1964).

From our examination of the record, we are convinced that there is no evidence of any change of circumstances since the divorce decree. Nor do we feel that plaintiff proved his allegation that defendant is an unfit mother. Though there was some discrepancy in the testimony, we must give due deference to the decision of the trial judge who had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses. We cannot say that his judgment was clearly erroneous.

We feel the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining the best interests of this child and can find no reason not to defer to its findings. An extensive opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed.

WEIER, CLEMENS and McMILLIAN, JJ., concur.
|Exhibit 4.75
|------------
|            
|            
|            



This is an English
Translation



Spousal Consent
Letter



I, Jianxin Gao He (ID No:    ), as the
legal spouse of Xiangdong Qi (ID No: ), hereby unconditionally agree that the equity interests of Beijing Qihu Technology Company
Limited, owned by and registered under name of my spouse, is disposed in accordance with the arrangements under Loan Agreement,
Equity, Equity Disposition Agreement and Equity Pledge Agreement dated as of October 18, 2010 and other supplementary agreements
to be signed from time to time.



I further guarantee not to take any
action at any time with an intention conflicting against the above-identified arrangements, including making a claim to court or
other competent authorities that such equity interests constitute the property or community property between my spouse and me.
I, unconditionally and irrevocably, hereby waive any and all rights or benefits granted to me with relation to such equity interests
under applicable laws and confirm that in no event such equity interests constitute any community property between my spouse and
me.



| |                     |                 
| | ------------------- | ----------------
| | Name of the Spouse: | /s/ Jianxin Gao 
| |                     | Jianxin Gao     
| | ID No:              |                 
| | Date                | October 18, 2010



Witness:





/s/ Mingzhe Zhou

_______________________

Mingzhe Zhou









/s/ Qiuhua Xu

_______________________

Qiuhua Xu
Exhibit 10.49


 





GUARANTY


 


Principal Amount: $85,000.00

Date: July 31,2014


 


WHEREAS,
Epazz, Inc., by Shaun Passley, President, executed for the benefit of Epazz, Inc. (hereinafter called "Guarantor"),
is now indebted to Timothy Beerup (hereinafter called "Lender"), as evidenced by that certain promissory note dated the
31th of July, 2014, executed by Telecorp Products, Inc., by Shaun Passley, President ("Borrower"), payable
to the order of Timothy Beerup, Inc. in the principal amount of Eighty Five Thousand and no 00/100 Dollars ($85,000.00) (hereinafter,
the "Guaranteed Indebtedness").


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for a valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, the undersigned
(hereinafter, called "Guarantor"), unconditionally guarantees to Lender the prompt payment of monthly installment payments
to Lender and at maturity of the note by July 31, 2015, by acceleration or otherwise, of any and all of the Guaranteed Indebtedness,
together with interest as provided in the Promissory Note, which monthly payment shall be made to Lender's address of 2101 West
Broadway, Suite 168, Columbia, Missouri 65203, or at such other place as the Lender may designate in writing with notice of such
designation to Guarantor.


 


Guarantor
hereby agrees that this Guaranty is given solely in consideration of the value received by the Borrower from the Lender. Guarantor
hereby agrees that this Guaranty is a guarantee of payment and performance.


 


Should the
status of the Borrower change, this Guaranty shall continue and also cover the Guaranteed Indebtedness of the Borrower under the
status of Guarantor, according to the terms hereof guaranteeing the Guaranteed Indebtedness of the original Borrower.


 


This is
a continuing Guaranty, and shall apply to and cover Guaranteed Indebtedness and renewals, extensions and modifications thereof
without regard to form or amount which Borrower may incur, create, renew, extend or alter, in whole or in part.


 


In the event
of the dissolution of the Borrower, the obligation of the Guarantor shall continue in full force and effect against Guarantor as
to all indebtedness, which shall have been created or incurred by the Borrower.


 


Guarantor
agrees that this Guaranty shall be binding upon Guarantor, Guarantors' heirs, devisees, executors, administrators, personal representatives,
successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by Lender and Lender's successors and assigns. Guarantor
shall not assign Guarantor's obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of Lender.


 


GUARANTOR:


 


/s/ Shaun Passley                                     


Epazz, Inc., an Illinois Corporation


Shaun Passley, President of Epazz, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2468 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2468

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
 reimbursement for emergency medical treatment and to require that the 
 Department of Veterans Affairs be treated as a participating provider 
 for the recovery of the costs of certain medical care, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2014

 Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
 reimbursement for emergency medical treatment and to require that the 
 Department of Veterans Affairs be treated as a participating provider 
 for the recovery of the costs of certain medical care, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Emergency Health Care 
Safety Net Expansion Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT REIMBURSEMENT FOR 
              CERTAIN VETERANS.

    Section 1725(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``an active Department 
        health-care participant'' and inserting ``enrolled in the 
        health care system established under section 1705(a) of this 
        title'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS PARTICIPATING 
              PROVIDER FOR RECOVERY OF COSTS OF CERTAIN MEDICAL CARE.

    Section 1729(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``(f) No law'' and inserting the following:
    ``(f)(1) In the case of a veteran who is entitled to care (or 
payment of the expenses of care) under a health-plan contract, for 
purposes of reimbursement for providing care or services under this 
chapter to that veteran for a non-service-connected disability 
described in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (a)(2), the 
Department shall be treated as a participating provider under that 
health-plan contract.
    ``(2) No law''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 15

                       To Cyprus Amax Minerals Company's
                         Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                      For the Quarter Ended June 30, 1999
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 15

August 4, 1999

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

We are aware that Cyprus Amax Minerals Company has included our report dated
August 4, 1999 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 71) in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1999, which is incorporated by reference in each of the following:

  (a) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-1600, 33-22939 and 33-53792)
      with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Savings Plan and Trust.

  (b) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-1603, 33-21501 and 33-53794)
      with respect to the Management Incentive Program of Cyprus Amax Minerals
      Company and its participating subsidiaries.

  (c) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-52812) with respect to the
      Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.

  (d) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-51011) with respect to the 1988
      Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.

  (e) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-61141) with respect to the
      Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Thrift Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees.

  (f) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-36413) with respect to the Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Savings
      Plan and Trust.

  (g) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-54097), as amended,  with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
      and Cyprus Amax Finance Corporation.

  (h) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-54097) with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company $250 million 7
      percent Notes due May 15, 2007.

  (i) Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
      (No. 33-62145) with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and Cyprus
      Amax Finance Corporation $600 million Shelf Registration.

We are also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.

Yours very truly,



/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP