alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 USAFE-UK host RAF leaders, sign interoperability charterPublished Dec. 7, 2018
                        
                        By Capt. Jhanelle Haag
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces Europe-United Kingdom Public Affairs
                **ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH, U.K. (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Air Force and Royal Air Force leaders met to discuss bilateral relations and sign the Combat Air Interoperability Working Group Charter at RAF Lakenheath, U.K., Nov. 27. 
Brig. Gen. Andrew Hansen, U.S. Air Forces Europe-United Kingdom director, hosted Air Vice-Marshal Harv Smyth, Air Officer Commanding No. 1 Group, last week to strengthen host nation ties and sign the CAIWG charter. The agreement outlines operational integration of advanced fighters and training infrastructure. 
“Anytime we can come together as allies and improve our readiness states is a victory,” Smyth said. “I’m happy to have this opportunity to sign the charter and continue our special relationship.”
The CAIWG is a working group composed of U.S. and Royal Air Force leaders who discuss issues related to airspace and training ranges for fourth and fifth-generation aircraft.
“Today both nations took a step together to ensure readiness and interoperability for our fifth-generation aircraft,” said Hansen. “The charter gives us an opportunity to quantify our roles and responsibilities and further solidifies the strong alliance we have with the United Kingdom.”
The timing of the charter is critical due to the arrival of the F-35B Lighting II to RAF Marham, U.K., June 7, 2018 and the projected arrival of the F-35A Lighting II to RAF Lakenheath in 2021.RAF Lakenheath 



Royal Air Force 



bilateral 



Combat Air Interoperability Working Group Charter 



CAIWG 



U.S. Air Forces Europe 



USAFE 



United Kingdom 



U.K. 



fifth-generation 



f-35b 



Lighting II 



RAF Marham 



Air Force 



AF
Exhibit 32.1

March 15, 2013

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



By:

/s/    MICHAEL J. ULRICHMichael J. UlrichVice President The Bank of
New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2630 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require disclosure to 

States of the basis of determinations under such Act, to ensure use 

of information provided by State, tribal, and county governments in 

decisionmaking under such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2014 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require 

disclosure to States of the basis of determinations under 

such Act, to ensure use of information provided by State, 

tribal, and county governments in decisionmaking under 

such Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State, Tribal, and 

5 Local Species Transparency and Recovery Act’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2630 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING DECISIONAL TRANSPARENCY WITH AF2 FECTED STATES. 

3 Section 6(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

4 (16 U.S.C. 1535(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before the first sentence; 

6 and 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘Such cooperation shall include’’ 

8 and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) Such cooperation shall include— 

10 ‘‘(A) before making a determination under sec11 tion 4(a), providing to States affected by such deter12 mination all data that is the basis of the determina13 tion; and 

14 ‘‘(B)’’. 

15 SEC. 3. ENSURING USE OF STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL IN16 FORMATION. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3 of the Endangered Spe18 cies Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1532) is amended— 

19 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through 

20 (21) as paragraphs (3) through (22), respectively; 

21 and 

22 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol23 lowing: 

24 ‘‘(2) The term ‘best scientific and commercial data 

25 available’ includes all such data submitted by a State, trib26 al, or county government.’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2630 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 7(n) of 

2 such Act (16 U.S.C. 1536(n)) is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘section 3(13)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 3(14)’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Smith, Torrey & Co. *v.*Greenin and Vine.

The plaintiff can demur to an answer, only for defects in respect of the new matter set up therein by way of avoidance.

Irrelevant or redundant matter in an answer, may be stricken out on motion, and in like manner uncertain or indefinite matter may be made more definite.

Immaterial matter cannot be demurred to.

The defendant’s omission to answer ah alldghtion Of the complaiht, id no ground of demurrer.

March, 1850.

The points presented appear in the decision;

Mason, J.

The code has enacted some new rules with regard to insufficient and irrelevant pleadings, which have not been attended to in these demurrers.

In the first place, a plaintiff can demur for insufficiency, only to new matter which is set up by way of defence. (Section 153 in connection with section 149.) If irrelevant or redundant matter is inserted, he may move to strike it out; or if an allegation is so indefinite or uncertain; that the precise nature of the defence is not apparent, he may move that it be made more definite. (§ 160.)

The first demurrer taken, falls under the provisions of this last section. If the statement of the agreement between the defendants is immaterial, it may upon application be stricken out; and if the allegation of the defective execution by the plaintiffs of the articles, is too indefinite or uncertain, it may be made more definite or certain by amendment; or it may be stricken out as irrelevant. This last matter, if well pleaded, would be in the nature of a demurrer to the plaintiff's claim. It amounts to this, that upon the plaintiff’s own showing, the defendants were not bound by the agreement, and no demurrer can be taken to a demurrer, whether the issue in law be well or ill tendered. (Steph. on Plead. 256.) The first demurrer must therefore be overruled.

The fifth demurrer is liable to one of the same objections ; it *703is taken on the ground of the immateriality of the matter demurred to, and must therefore be overruled.

Nor is it a ground of demurrer, that the defendant has not denied any allegation of the complaint in the form and manner prescribed by section 149. The 168th section provides, that every material allegation of the complaint not specifically controverted by the answer, as prescribed by section 149, shall be taken as true. If, therefore, the plaintiff is right in supposing that the defendants’ denial of knowledge of any fact other than from the complaint, is not such a denial as is required by the code, he is saved from the necessity of proving such fact on the trial. This remark applies to the third, fourth and sixth demurrers, which must therefore be overruled, ,
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50115 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GENARO NAVARRETE-ZAVALA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1745-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Genaro NavarreteZavala raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20046 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR HUGO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-405-2

-------------------- July 10, 2001 Before JOLLY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Victor Hugo Martinez on appeal has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez filed a response. Pursuant to this court’s order, counsel filed a supplemental brief. Martinez did not file a response to counsel’s supplemental brief. Our independent review of the original and supplemental briefs, Martinez’s response to the original brief, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, the motion forNo. 00-20046 -2- leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
```

EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
--------------------------------------------

We  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Amendment  No. 2 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-88446) of PFGI Capital Corporation
and in the  related  prospectus  of our report  dated  April 11,  2003,  with
respect to the financial  statements of PFGI Capital Corporation  included in
this Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the period from June 12, 2002 to December
31, 2002.

                                                    /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
April 11, 2003
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements (File No. 333-50259; File No. 333-94439 and File No.
333-89683).


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
-------------------------
Arthur Andersen LLP

San Antonio, Texas
April 13, 2000
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2577 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling up to $5,000,000 

for information on the kidnapping and murder of Naftali Fraenkel, 

a dual United States-Israeli citizen, that began on June 12, 2014. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling 

up to $5,000,000 for information on the kidnapping and 

murder of Naftali Fraenkel, a dual United States-Israeli 

citizen, that began on June 12, 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

5 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

6 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

7 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re8 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2577 IS

1 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

2 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

3 aiding or abetting in the commission of the kidnapping 

4 and murder of Naftali Fraenkel. 

5 (b) LIMIT ON TOTAL REWARDS.—The total amount 

6 of rewards offered under subsection (a) may not exceed 

7 $5,000,000. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William Tanona, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William TanonaName: William Tanona Date:  March 15, 2016
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549

                                ______________

                                   FORM 8-K
                                CURRENT REPORT

                        PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED): NOVEMBER 1, 2000

                                ______________

                        CONCENTRA OPERATING CORPORATION
            (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


            Nevada                         001-15699            75-2822620
       (State or other          (Commission File Number)     (I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of incorporation)                            Identification Number)

      5080 Spectrum Drive
     Suite 400 - West Tower                                        75001
        Addison, Texas                                           (Zip code)
     (Address of principal
       executive offices)



      Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (972) 364-8000

                                Not Applicable
                 (former address if changed since last report)

                                    -MORE-
<PAGE>

Concentra Reports Third Quarter Results
Page 2
November 1, 2000


Item 5. Other Events

See the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 dated November 1, 2000,
announcing financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, for
Concentra Operating Corporation.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits

(c) Exhibits

99.1    Press Release of the Registrant dated November 1, 2000


                                    -MORE-
<PAGE>

Concentra Reports Third Quarter Results
Page 3
November 1, 2000



                                  SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                           CONCENTRA OPERATING CORPORATION
                                           (Registrant)


                                           By:     /s/ Richard A. Parr II
                                                   -----------------------------
                                           Name:   Richard A. Parr II
                                           Title:  Executive Vice President,
                                                   General Counsel & Secretary

Date:  November 6,  2000

                                    -MORE-
<PAGE>

Concentra Reports Third Quarter Results
Page 5
November 1, 2000


                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

99.1     Press Release of Registrant dated November 1, 2000

                                    -MORE-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
*This financial data schedule has been restated to reflect the acquisition of
ASBI Holdings, Inc. on April 28, 2000, accounted for under the
pooling-of-interests method.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1998
<CASH>                                          17,372
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,014,099
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             71,213
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        2,229,587
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             32,144
<PP&E>                                          11,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,490,621
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   3,014,544
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          2,227,874
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               1,662
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,329
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,490,621
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               12,576
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           173,464
<COMMISSIONS>                                   59,401
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   29,451
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   26,607
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             113,795
<COMPENSATION>                                  96,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,472
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      42,472
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,023
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.96


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM PATTERSON.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force directs one-day operational safety reviewPublished May 8, 2018
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein directed all Air Force wings with flying and maintenance functions to execute a one-day operational safety review by May 21, 2018.
“I am directing this operational safety review to allow our commanders to assess and discuss the safety of our operations and to gather feedback from our Airmen who are doing the mission every day,” said Goldfein.
After a series of recent aviation mishaps and fatalities, including a WC-130 Hercules crash May 2, the Air Force is taking swift action to ensure the safety of its force. Although safety statistics over the past decade show Air Force Class A and B aviation mishaps trended downward, the Air Force's manned aviation mishap rate increased since the beginning of fiscal year 2018.
During the safety review, commander-led forums will gather feedback from Airmen who execute the Air Force's flying operations and challenge Airmen to identify issues that may cause a future mishap.
“We cannot afford to lose a single Airman or weapons system due to a mishap that could have been prevented,” said Goldfein. “Our men and women have volunteered to give their last full measure for America's security. My intent is to have commanders lead focused forums with their Airmen to help identify gaps and seams that exist or are developing, which could lead to future mishaps or unsafe conditions.”
Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright's video message about the important role every Airmen plays in identifying gaps and seams that can lead to future mishaps or unsafe conditions.safety 



review 



CSAF 



SecAF 



flying 



maintenance 



mission 



Aviation 



mishaps 



WC-130 



crash
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Daniel Lozinsky, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MobilePro Corp.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantasof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controlsover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
January 23, 2004
/s/ Daniel Lozinsky