Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices 53661 

1The Barden Corporation (UK) Limited/ 

Schaeffler Group (UK) Limited. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–427–801, A–428–801, A–475–801, A–588– 

804, A–412–801] 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the 

United Kingdom: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On April 28, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce published the 

preliminary results of the administrative 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on ball bearings and parts thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the 

United Kingdom. The reviews cover 22 

manufacturers/exporters. The period of 

review is May 1, 2008, through April 30, 

2009. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

changes, including corrections of certain 

programming and other ministerial 

errors, in the margin calculations. 

Therefore, the final results are different 

from the preliminary results for certain 

companies. The final weighted-average 

dumping margins for the reviewed firms 

are listed below in the section entitled 

‘‘Final Results of the Reviews.’’ We have 

also determined that myonic GmbH, a 

firm which is subject to the order on 

ball bearings and parts thereof from 

Germany, is the successor-in-interest to 

the pre-acquisition myonic GmbH. 

Finally, we are announcing our 

revocation of the order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof from the United 

Kingdom in part with respect to subject 

merchandise exported and/or sold by 

Barden/Schaeffler UK 1 to the United 

States. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 1, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Schauer or Richard Rimlinger, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0410 or (202) 482– 

4477, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 28, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the preliminary results of the 

administrative reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from France, 

Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom. See Ball Bearings and Parts 

Thereof From France, et al.: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Preliminary 

Results of Changed-Circumstances 

Review, Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews In Part, and 

Intent To Revoke Order In Part, 75 FR 

22384 (April 28, 2010), and Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, 

Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Preliminary Results of 

Changed-Circumstances Review, 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Part, and 

Intent To Revoke Order In Part, 75 FR 

26920 (May 13, 2010) (collectively, 

Preliminary Results). For these 

administrative reviews, the period of 

review is May 1, 2008, through April 30, 

2009. 

We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

We received case and rebuttal briefs 

from various parties to the proceedings. 

No hearing was requested. 

The Department has conducted these 

administrative reviews in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Orders 

The products covered by the orders 

are ball bearings and parts thereof. 

These products include all antifriction 

bearings that employ balls as the rolling 

element. Imports of these products are 

classified under the following 

categories: antifriction balls, ball 

bearings with integral shafts, ball 

bearings (including radial ball bearings) 

and parts thereof, and housed or 

mounted ball bearing units and parts 

thereof. 

Imports of these products are 

classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

3926.90.45, 4016.93.10, 4016.93.50, 

6909.19.50.10, 8431.20.00, 

8431.39.00.10, 8482.10.10, 8482.10.50, 

8482.80.00, 8482.91.00, 8482.99.05, 

8482.99.35, 8482.99.25.80, 

8482.99.65.95, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 

8483.30.40, 8483.30.80, 8483.50.90, 

8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.70, 

8708.50.50, 8708.60.50, 8708.60.80, 

8708.93.30, 8708.93.60.00, 8708.99.06, 

8708.99.31.00, 8708.99.40.00, 

8708.99.49.60, 8708.99.58, 

8708.99.80.15, 8708.99.80.80, 

8803.10.00, 8803.20.00, 8803.30.00, 

8803.90.30, 8803.90.90, 8708.30.50.90, 

8708.40.75.70, 8708.40.75.80, 

8708.50.79.00, 8708.50.89.00, 

8708.50.91.50, 8708.50.99.00, 

8708.70.60.60, 8708.80.65.90, 

8708.93.75.00, 8708.94.75, 

8708.95.20.00, 8708.99.55.00, 

8708.99.68, and 8708.99.81.80. 

Although the HTSUS item numbers 

above are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes, the written 

descriptions of the scope of the orders 

remain dispositive. 

The size or precision grade of a 

bearing does not influence whether the 

bearing is covered by one of the orders. 

The orders cover all the subject bearings 

and parts thereof (inner race, outer race, 

cage, rollers, balls, seals, shields, etc.) 

outlined above with certain limitations. 

With regard to finished parts, all such 

parts are included in the scope of the 

orders. For unfinished parts, such parts 

are included if they have been heattreated or if heat treatment is not 

required to be performed on the part. 

Thus, the only unfinished parts that are 

not covered by the orders are those that 

will be subject to heat treatment after 

importation. The ultimate application of 

a bearing also does not influence 

whether the bearing is covered by the 

orders. Bearings designed for highly 

specialized applications are not 

excluded. Any of the subject bearings, 

regardless of whether they may 

ultimately be utilized in aircraft, 

automobiles, or other equipment, are 

within the scope of the orders. 

For a list of scope determinations 

which pertain to the orders, see the 

‘‘Memorandum to Laurie Parkhill’’ 

regarding scope determinations for the 

2008/2009 reviews, dated April 21, 

2010, which is on file in the Central 

Records Unit (CRU) of the main 

Department of Commerce building, 

room 1117, in the General Issues record 

(A–100–001). 

Analysis of the Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs by 

parties to these administrative reviews 

of the antidumping duty orders on ball 

bearings and parts thereof are addressed 

in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum’’ (Decision Memorandum) 

from Edward C. Yang, Acting Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

dated concurrently with this notice, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

A list of the issues which parties have 

raised and to which we have responded 

is in the Decision Memorandum and 

attached to this notice as an Appendix. 

The Decision Memorandum, which is a 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
53662 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices 

public document, is on file in the CRU 

of the main Department of Commerce 

building, Room 1117, and is accessible 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Revocation of Order in Part 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

preliminarily determined that Barden/ 

Schaeffler UK qualifies for revocation 

from the order on ball bearings and 

parts thereof from the United Kingdom 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2)(i). 

Accordingly, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.222(b)(2)(ii), we preliminarily 

determined to revoke the order with 

respect to ball bearings and parts thereof 

from the United Kingdom exported and/ 

or sold by Barden/Schaeffler UK to the 

United States. 

We have received comments 

concerning our intent to revoke the 

order on ball bearings and parts thereof 

from the United Kingdom exported and/ 

or sold by Barden/Schaeffler UK to the 

United States. See the Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 4 for further 

discussion of this issue. In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2)(ii), we are 

revoking the order on ball bearings and 

parts thereof from the United Kingdom 

exported and/or sold by Barden/ 

Schaeffler UK to the United States, 

effective May 1, 2009. 

Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

preliminarily determined that myonic 

GmbH is the successor-in-interest to the 

pre-acquisition myonic GmbH and 

invited interested parties to comment. 

We received no comments from 

interested parties. For the reasons we 

stated in the Preliminary Results and 

because we received no comments to 

the contrary from interested parties, we 

continue to determine that the postacquisition myonic GmbH is the 

successor-in-interest to the preacquisition myonic GmbH. 

Consequently, we will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

continue to apply the cash-deposit rate 

in effect for myonic GmbH to all entries 

of the subject merchandise from myonic 

GmbH that were entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of changed-circumstances 

review. 

Rates for Non-Selected Companies 

Based on our analysis of the responses 

and our available resources, we selected 

certain companies for individual 

examination of their sales of the subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the period of review as permitted under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. For a 

detailed discussion on the selection of 

the respondents for individual 

examination, see Preliminary Results, 75 

FR at 22385. For the final results, we 

have not changed the basis of the rate 

we applied to respondents not selected 

for individual examination. With 

respect to the sole company not selected 

in the Germany proceeding, however, 

we have used publicly available ranged 

sales values submitted by myonic GmbH 

and Schaeffler KG to calculate a 

weighted-average margin to assign to 

SKF GmbH instead of assigning the 

simple-average margin calculated using 

the margins we determined for myonic 

GmbH and Schaeffler KG, as announced 

in the Preliminary Results. For a 

discussion of this issue, see the Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 1. See also 

the memorandum to the file, dated 

concurrently with this notice, entitled 

‘‘Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

Germany: Final Calculation of the 

Margin for Respondent Not Selected for 

Individual Examination’’ on the record 

of the Germany proceeding (A–428– 

801). 

Our calculation of the final margin for 

the sole non-selected company in the 

Germany administrative review 

represents a change in our practice 

concerning the margin applicable to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative review 

of an antidumping duty order. In 

situations where we cannot apply our 

normal methodology of calculating a 

weighted-average margin due to 

requests to protect business-proprietary 

information but where use of a simple 

average does not yield the best proxy of 

the weighted-average margin relative to 

publicly available data, normally we 

will use the publicly available figures as 

a matter of practice in future cases. 

With respect to the Japan proceeding, 

one company selected for individual 

examination used the indexing method 

permitted under 19 CFR 351.304(c) in 

the public version of its response to our 

request for information concerning the 

quantity and value of U.S. sales during 

the period of review. Therefore, unlike 

in the Germany proceeding where 

public, ranged data are available for all 

of the companies that were selected for 

individual examination, similar 

information is not available for all such 

companies in the Japan proceeding. 

Accordingly, we cannot calculate a 

weighted-average margin to consider 

applying to the non-selected 

respondents in the Japan proceeding as 

we have calculated for the Germany 

proceeding. Instead, as explained in the 

Preliminary Results, we have 

determined to apply the simple average 

of the margins we calculated for the 

selected companies to the companies 

not selected for individual examination 

in the Japan proceeding. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

received and based on our own analysis 

of the Preliminary Results, we have 

made revisions that have changed the 

results for certain companies. We have 

corrected programming and ministerial 

errors in the margins we included in the 

Preliminary Results, where applicable. 

A detailed discussion of each correction 

we made is in the company-specific 

analysis memoranda dated concurrently 

with this notice, which are on file in the 

CRU of the main Department of 

Commerce building, Room 1117. 

Final Results of the Reviews 

We determine that the following 

percentage weighted-average dumping 

margins on ball bearings and parts 

thereof exist for the period May 1, 2008, 

through April 30, 2009: 

Company Margin 

(percent) 

FRANCE 

SKF France S.A. ...................... 6.86 

Microturbo SAS ........................ 6.86 

GERMANY 

myonic GmbH ........................... 21.72 

Schaeffler KG ........................... 2.16 

SKF GmbH ............................... 6.59 

ITALY 

SKF Industrie S.p.A. ................. 13.04 

Schaeffler Italia S.r.l. ................ 1.98 

JAPAN 

Aisin Seiki Company, Ltd. ........ 10.97 

JTEKT Corporation ................... 10.97 

Makino Milling Machine Company Limited .......................... 10.97 

Mazda Motor Corporation ......... 10.97 

Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation ..... 10.97 

Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. .... 10.97 

NSK Ltd. ................................... 8.48 

NTN Corporation ...................... 13.46 

Sapporo Precision, Inc., and 

Tokyo Precision, Inc. ............ 10.97 

Univance Corporation ............... 10.97 

Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation ................................. 10.97 

UNITED KINGDOM 

The Barden Corporation (UK) 

Limited/Schaeffler Group 

(UK) Limited .......................... 0.00 

NSK Bearings Europe Ltd. ....... 10.04 

SKF (UK) Limited ..................... 10.04 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices 53663 

Company Margin 

(percent) 

Timken UK Ltd. and Timken 

Aerospace UK Ltd. ................ 10.04 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries. In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have 

calculated, whenever possible, an 

exporter/importer- (or customer-) 

specific assessment rate or value for 

merchandise subject to these reviews as 

described below. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review produced by 

companies selected for individual 

examination in the reviews for which 

the reviewed companies did not know 

their merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the country-specific all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to apply the rates 

listed above to all entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by such firms. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of these final results of 

reviews. 

Export Price 

With respect to export-price (EP) 

sales, we divided the total dumping 

margins (calculated as the difference 

between normal value and EP) for each 

exporter’s importer or customer by the 

total number of units the exporter sold 

to that importer or customer. We will 

direct CBP to assess the resulting perunit dollar amount against each unit of 

merchandise in each of that importer’s/ 

customer’s entries under the relevant 

order during the review period. 

Constructed Export Price 

For constructed export-price (CEP) 

sales, we divided the total dumping 

margins for the reviewed sales by the 

total entered value of those reviewed 

sales for each importer. We will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting percentage 

margin against the entered customs 

values for the subject merchandise on 

each of that importer’s entries under the 

relevant order during the review period. 

See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

To calculate the cash-deposit rate for 

each respondent, i.e., each exporter and/ 

or manufacturer included in these 

reviews, we divided the total dumping 

margins for each company by the total 

net value of that company’s sales of 

merchandise during the period of 

review subject to each order. 

To derive a single deposit rate for 

each respondent, we weight-averaged 

the EP and CEP deposit rates (using the 

EP and CEP, respectively, as the 

weighting factors). To accomplish this 

when we sampled CEP sales (see 

Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 22385), we 

first calculated the total dumping 

margins for all CEP sales during the 

period of review by multiplying the 

sample CEP margins by the ratio of total 

days in the period of review to days in 

the sample weeks. We then calculated a 

total net value for all CEP sales during 

the period of review by multiplying the 

sample CEP total net value by the same 

ratio. Finally, we divided the combined 

total dumping margins for both EP and 

CEP sales by the combined total value 

of both EP and CEP sales to obtain the 

deposit rate. 

We will direct CBP to collect the 

resulting percentage deposit rate against 

the entered customs value of each of the 

exporter’s entries of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Entries of parts incorporated into 

finished bearings before sales to an 

unaffiliated customer in the United 

States will receive the respondent’s 

deposit rate applicable to the order. 

Furthermore, the following deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of this notice of final results 

of administrative reviews for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cashdeposit rates for the reviewed 

companies will be the rates shown 

above; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash-deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in these 

reviews, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigations but the 

manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be the allothers rate for the relevant order made 

effective by the final results of reviews 

published on July 26, 1993. See Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Revocation 

in Part of an Antidumping Duty Order, 

58 FR 39729 (July 26, 1993). For ball 

bearings and parts thereof from Italy, see 

Antifriction Bearings (Other Than 

Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts 

Thereof From France, et al.; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Partial 

Termination of Administrative Reviews, 

61 FR 66472, 66521 (December 17, 

1996). These rates are the all-others 

rates from the relevant less-than-fairvalue investigations. These deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notifications 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: August 26, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix 

1. Rate Selection for SKF Germany. 

2. SKF’s Bearing Kits. 

3. Short-Term U.S. Interest Rate for 

Inventory-Carrying Costs. 

4. Barden’s Request for Revocation. 

5. Deduction of CEP Profit. 

6. Freight and Packing Revenue Offset 

Caps. 

7. Importer-Specific Assessment Rates. 

8. 15–Day Issuance of Liquidation 

Instructions. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
53664 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests to 

extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing 

of good cause. 

9. Zeroing of Negative Margins. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21839 Filed 8–31–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating a five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping duty orders listed below. 

The International Trade Commission 

(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 1, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 

13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 

62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3 

—Policies Regarding the Conduct of 

Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 

(April 16, 1998). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset 

Review of the following antidumping 

duty orders: 

DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department conctact 

A–580–807 ....... 731–TA–459 ..... South Korea ..... Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film (3rd 

Review).

Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

A–588–702 ....... 731–TA–376 ..... Japan ................ Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (3rd 

Review).

Dana Mermelstein, (202) 492–1391. 

A–580–813 ....... 731–TA–563 ..... South Korea ..... Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (3rd 

Review).

Dana Mermelstein, (202) 492–1391. 

A–583–816 ....... 731–TA–564 ..... Taiwan .............. Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings (3rd 

Review).

Dana Mermelstein, (202) 492–1391. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to Sunset Review 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Department’s 

regulations, the Department schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Internet 

Web site at the following address: 

http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/. All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, service, and 

certification of documents. These rules 

can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The Department’s regulations on 

submission of proprietary information 

and eligibility to receive access to 

business proprietary information under 

APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304– 

306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties defined in 

section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing 

to participate in a Sunset Review must 

respond not later than 15 days after the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The 

required contents of the notice of intent 

to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, the 

Department will automatically revoke 

the order without further review. See 19 

CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES