alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS





We hereby consent to the use by SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) of our name and to the inclusion of information taken from the reports listed below in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 201 8 , filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on or about March 14 , 201 9 , including any amendments thereto:





December 31, 201 8 , SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Interest in Certain Properties located in Oklahoma — SEC Price Case


December 31, 201 7 , SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Interest in Certain Properties located in Oklahoma — SEC Price Case


December 31, 201 6 , SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Interest in Certain Properties located in Oklahoma — SEC Price Case








CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:/s/ J. Zane MeekinsJ. Zane MeekinsExecutive Vice President





Fort Worth, Texas


March 14 , 201 9
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthis annual report of Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidF. Brussard, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

·       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.
| /s/ DAVID  F. BRUSSARD                   |     |
|------------------------------------------|----------|
| David F. Brussard                        |     |
| *President, Chief Executive Officer and* | * * |
| *Chairman of the Board*                  | * * |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*          | * * |
| March 1, 2007                       |     |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-1835

___________________________

Apollyon Kennedy-Bey

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Metropolitan Council; Emmanuel Martinez Cruz; John Steele; Matthew Brake;

Timothy Asp, each in his official capacity as a Metro Transit Police Officer

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: March 1, 2018

Filed: April 3, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Apollyon Kennedy-Bey appeals after

the district court adversely granted summary judgment. 1

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in striking Kennedy-Bey’s

untimely amended complaint, see Kmak v. Am. Century Cos., 873 F.3d 1030, 1034

(8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review), and properly granted summary judgment, see

Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary

judgment isreviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant);

see also City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 109, 111 (1983) (plaintiff was

not entitled to injunction where there was no showing of any real or immediate threat

that plaintiff would be wronged again); Monroe v. Ark. State Univ., 495 F.3d 591,

594 (8th Cir. 2007) (Eleventh Amendment bars suits for any kind of relief against

states and state agencies); Murphy v. State of Ark., 127 F.3d 750, 754 (8th Cir. 1997)

(§ 1983 claims for damages against defendants in their official capacities were

barred). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Lawrence E. Hyatt, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cole NationalCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: September 7, 2004 /s/ Lawrence E. Hyatt Lawrence E. Hyatt Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that
(i) the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed by Botetourt Bankshares Corporation (the small business issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2005                               
|                                                   
|/s/ H. Watts Steger, III                           
|H. Watts Steger, III                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES DEBLOIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 117 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ROBERT W. SHANERRobert W. Shaner Interim Chief Executive Officer/s/    WINSTON E.
HICKMANWinston E. Hickman Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




Date: June 9, 2004
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |   |                /s/ PETER DE VISSER |   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Name:    Peter de Visser                                                             |   |   |
|   |   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer                                        |   |   |
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofJacobs Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Stephen R. Roark,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       theAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Stephen R. Roark |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Name:                | Stephen R. Roark |
|   | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:                | March 25, 2005 |

 

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2249 

To amend the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use or Distribution Act to 

extend a certain income tax exemption to the Grand Portage Band 

of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. FRANKEN (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use or Distribution Act to extend a certain income tax exemption 

to the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 

Indians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Portage Band 

5 Per Capita Adjustment Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2249 IS

1 SEC. 2. EQUAL TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER CAPITA IN2 COME FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL ASSIST3 ANCE. 

4 Section 7(4) of the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds 

5 Use or Distribution Act (25 U.S.C. 1407(4)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘pursuant to the agreements of such Band to 

7 voluntarily restrict tribal rights to hunt and fish in terri8 tory cede’’ and inserting ‘‘or the Grand Portage Band of 

9 Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, or both, pursuant to the 

10 agreements of each band to voluntarily restrict tribal 

11 rights to hunt and fish in territory ceded’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2293 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2293

 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2014

 Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Markey, and Mr. Blumenthal) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Scenic Trails Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System'' before the period at the end.

SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third and fourth sentences and 
inserting ``The trail shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Interior as a unit of the National Park System.''.

SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System,'' after ``administer the trail''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7552

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BENJAMIN NELSON HOLMES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00121-CWH-1; 4:05-cv-02953-CWH) Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Nelson Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Benjamin Nelson Holmes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holmes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CONSENT OF EXPERT


Reference is made to the feasibility study entitled “Feasibility Study and Technical Report Update on the Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” with an effective date of June 19, 2014 (the “Report”).
  I, Herbert A. Smith, on behalf ofAMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.(the “Company”), consent to the use of the Company’s name and references to the Report, and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report, in(i) Pretium Resources Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (ii) Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726 and 333-197304) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Very truly yours,
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53980-53981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWYD01000-2009-LL13100000-NB0000-LXSI016K0000]


Notice of Rescheduled Meetings of the Pinedale Anticline Working 
Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(1976) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Pinedale 
Anticline Working Group (PAWG) will conduct meetings in Pinedale, 
Wyoming. These meetings are open to the public.

DATES: The August 26, 2010, September 23, 2010, and October 28, 2010 
meetings have been cancelled. The PAWG will meet on the following 
dates: October 1, 2010, November 4, 2010, February 3, 2011, and May 6, 
2011, beginning at 10 a.m. MST.

ADDRESSES: BLM Pinedale Field Office, 1625 West Pine Street, Pinedale, 
WY.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelley Gregory, Bureau of Land 
Management, Pinedale Field Office, 1625 West Pine Street., P.O. Box 
768, Pinedale, WY 82941; 307-367-5328; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#addec5c8c1c1c8d4f2cadfc8cac2dfd4edcfc1c083cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb88939e97979e82a49c899e9c948982bb999796d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 53981]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PAWG was established by the 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Record of Decision (ROD) for the 
Pinedale Anticline Project Area (PAPA) on July 27, 2000 and carried 
forward with the release of the ROD for the PAPA Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on September 12, 2008.
    The PAWG is a Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) group which 
develops recommendations and provides advice to the BLM on mitigation, 
monitoring, and adaptive management issues as oil and gas development 
in the PAPA proceeds.
    Additional information about the PAWG can be found at: www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/field_offices/pinedale/pawg.html.

    Dated: August 27, 2010.
Donald A. Simpson,
State Director .
[FR Doc. 2010-21912 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Pure Resources, Inc.

     We consent to the inclusion of our report dated February 1, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Titan Exploration, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report is
incorporated by reference in the Form 8-K of Pure Resources, Inc. dated June 9,
2000.


                                            KPMG LLP


Midland, Texas
June 9, 2000
**Exhibit 10.9****AMENDMENT AGREEMENT**     **THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT**(this “Agreement”), dated as of August 6, 2006 by and between BallyTotal Fitness Holding Corporation (the “Company”) and Paul A. Toback (the “Executive”).**RECITALS**     **WHEREAS,**pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement by and between the Executive andthe Company dated as of August 24, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”), the Executive may becomeentitled to certain severance payments in the event his employment is terminated by the Companywithout Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or if the Executive resigns for Good Reason(as defined in the Employment Agreement), in each case, within the two-year period immediatelyfollowing a Change in Control (as defined in the Employment Agreement); and**WHEREAS**, a Change in Control occurred on February 7, 2006; and     **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive agreed to modify the Employment Agreement to eliminatethe Company’s obligation to implement a supplemental retirement plan for the benefit of theExecutive and to eliminate certain claims for legal fees that Executive may have had against theCompany in exchange for an additional payment to the Executive by the Company of $900,000 in theevent his employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or if the Executive resigns forGood Reason, in either case, prior to February 7, 2008.     **NOW THEREFORE**, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company and the Executive hereby agreeas follows:1. Section 4(e) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the Company shallhave no further obligation to the Executive with respect thereto.2. Section 6(e) of the Employment Agreement is amended to add a new subsection (vii) to provide asfollows:(vii) If the termination occurs prior to February 7, 2008, an immediate lump sum payment of$900,000.3. In consideration for the right to receive payment described in Section 2 above, the Executiveagrees that he has no entitlement to legal fees incurred by him prior to the date of thisAgreement.4. In all respects not amended, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forthabove.         BALLY TOTAL FITNESS HOLDING CORPORATION           BY: /s/ Harold Morgan                 TITLE: Senior Vice President, Chief Administration Officer           EXECUTIVE           /s/ Paul A. Toback         PAUL A. TOBACK
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CURTIS CRAWFORD.

March 19, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.