alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


Pursuant
      To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report Nayna Networks, Inc. (formerly ResCon
      Technology Corp.), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned, Thomas Richtarich, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      herby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*Date:
                August 20, 2007*
            *By:*
            */S/
                Thomas Richtarich**Thomas
                Richtarich,*
              *Principal
                Financial Officer*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1452

JOE LEWIS THOMAS; SARAH A. THOMAS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ENTERPRISE BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RICHARD CREECH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-02793-JMC)

Submitted: September 27, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Lewis Thomas, Sarah A. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Norma Anne Turner Jett, 

NESS & JETT, LLC, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Thomas and Sarah A. Thomas appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing their claim seeking relief under the Home Affordable Modification Program, 

12 U.S.C. §§ 5219, 5219a (2012), and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction 

over their state-law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Enter. 

Bank of S.C., No. 1:16-cv-02793-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7557

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HAROLD SMITH, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-85-166, CA-02-2456-6-13AK)

Submitted: January 8, 2003 Decided: February 3, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Harold Smith, Jr., a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as successive. An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a

§ 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of

appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate

both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether

the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 318

(2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Smith has not made the requisite

showing. See United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-85-166; CA-02-2456-6-

13AK (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN W. DUTHIE.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 200 *N.J.Super.*19)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of C&J Energy Services, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joshua E. Comstock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 17, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Joshua E. Comstock 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Joshua E. Comstock     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Webb *v.*Clark.

Where the affidavit verifying the complaint is defective, the remedy of the party . is by a motion to set it aside, and not by demurrer.

June, 1849.

Demurrer to a complaint, for the reason that it was verified by a book-keeper, and no cause stated why it was not verified by the plaintiff.

G. *Clark,*for the defendant.

G. *W. Morell,*for the plaintiff.

By the Court. Sandford, J.

The defendant has mistaken his remedy. He should have moved to set aside the complaint for irregularity. The verification forms no part of the pleading which can be considered on a demurrer.

Demurrer overruled.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**






I,
      Leslie
      I. Handler, President of Encompass Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March
      31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      May
      14, 2007






/s/
      LESLIE I. HANDLER


Leslie
      I.
      Handler


President
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, DaimlerChrysler Debenture-Backed Series 2002-4 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
         servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
         Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 29, 2004


         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
--------------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President




                                      8
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



This Compliance Certificate
is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of January 27,
2012, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2011-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),
Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned
hereby certifies that:



1)	I am a duly authorized officer of the
Servicer.



2)	A review of the activities of the Servicer
from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance under
the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.



3)	Based on such review, the Servicer has,
to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant
Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed
this Compliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2013.







| | HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA,
as Servicer
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| |                                     
| | By:                                 
| |
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.7
















CONSENT OF PAUL ARCHER







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Paul Archer, participated in the preparation of the technical reports entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance and Trenching Program, Ashuanipi Project, Québec” completed in January 2014 (the “Report”), concerning mineralized material in the Ashuanipi property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.4.4 Geological Setting; 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.4.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,














				
	 
	/S/

Paul Archer

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

Paul Archer, M.Sc., Eng.

	 
	 












May 15, 2014
#### PAUL A. EDGERTON v. ELIZABETH EDGERTON.

June 13, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: RENEE CUELLAR, DIRECTLY

AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF

3 LEGENDARY TIGERS, LLC D/B/A

TIPSY TIGER AND D/B/A EPTX,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 9

- 00035

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Rene e Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC

d/b/a Tipsy Tiger and d/b/a EPTX, has filed a mandamus petition against the Honorable Francisco

X. Dominguez, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Cuellar is challenging

Respondent’s order granting a motion filed by the Receiver, Robert Sandoval, requesting the return

of certain funds. Cuellar also filed a motion to stay the underlying proceedings. The motion for

emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus ar e denied.

Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to

compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by

appeal. In re Reece , 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011) ( orig. proceeding); In re Prudential

Insurance Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The

burden is on relator to show it is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company , 165

S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005) (orig . proceeding); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.- 2

-

1992)(orig. proceeding ). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we co nclude that

Relator ha s failed to show that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Acc ordingly, we deny the

motion for emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus

.

January 30 , 2019

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Tech Report: Thor Weather SystemPublished Oct. 16, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – The latest step in a long-running weather prediction arms race  is a supercomputer created by the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, and used by the 557th Weather Wing to get critical information to warfighters. The Thor Weather System provides accurate weather predictions that save time, resources and potentially, lives.
The Air Force Tech Report is a video series that gives viewers a quick look at current technology the Air Force uses to fly, fight and win.Tech Report 



weather 



THOR 



557th Weather Wing 



AFLCMC 



Air Force 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



Supercomputer 



Thor Weather System 



Air Force TV
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2298-000]


Enserco Energy Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 27, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Enserco Energy Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 16, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35737067767a5b595c5b50664045455a474175535047561b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21966 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### EARL HENDERSON v. MORRISTOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 198 *N.J.Super.*418)
<PAGE>



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uniprop Manufactured Housing
Communities Income Fund (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I Paul M Zlotoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respect, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Paul M Zlotoff
------------------
Principal Executive Officer,
General Partner of P.I. Associates Limited Partnership
President & Director of GP P.I. Associated Corp.

August 11, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 171 (Friday, September 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Biobehavioral and Behavioral 
Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: October 28-29, 2010.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6911, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cea6a1bea3afa0a0a38ea3afa7a2e0a0a7a6e0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c1c6d9c4c8c7c7c4e9c4c8c0c587c7c0c187cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 30, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-22107 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund V (the Partnership)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson             
|                        |  |  |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner
|                        |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund V