alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT 11
                  Computation of Earnings per Common Share


                                 Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                       June 30,                 June 30,
                              ------------------------  -----------------------
                                  1996         1995         1996        1995
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
Primary Earnings
 Net income (loss)            $(1,126,000)  $  493,000  $(1,028,000) $1,400,000
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------

Shares
 Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding    10,104,974   5,697,527    9,309,447   4,234,980

Assumed exercise of options
 and warrants (as determined
  by the application of the 
   treasury stock method)              --           --           --     655,514
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding
  as adjusted                  10,104,974   5,697,527    9,309,447   4,890,494
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------

Primary earnings per common
 share:
  Net income (loss)           $     (0.11)  $     0.09  $     (0.11) $     0.29
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
                                       
Fully Diluted Earnings
 Net income (loss)            $(1,126,000)  $  493,000  $(1,028,000) $1,400,000
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------

Shares
 Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding    10,104,974   5,697,527    9,309,447   4,890,494

Assuming conversion of 
 convertible  preferred stock          --           --      252,121     252,121
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------

Weighted average number of 
 common shares outstanding 
  as adjusted                  10,104,974   5,697,527     9,561,568   5,142,615
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------

Fully diluted earnings per 
 common share:
  Net income (loss)           $    (0.11)   $     0.09  $     (0.11) $     0.27
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------
                              -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------






                                       20
EXHIBIT 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ResCon Technology
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Christian Nigohossian, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
          (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.



Date: January 13, 2003   By: /S/ Christian Nigohossian
                         ------------------------------------
                         Christian Nigohossian
                         Chief Executive Officer and
                         Chief Financial Officer
#### GLORIA A. NADOLNY v. JOHN C. SABIA.

March 12, 1985.

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on the merits. See *Parks v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co.,*98 *N.J.*42 (1984).
Exhibit 10.48


 





BILL OF SALE


 






 


 






 


Seller, Strand, Inc.,
an Illinois corporation, of 2101 West Broadway, Suite 168, Columbia, Missouri 65203, in consideration of One Hundred Eighty-Five
Thousand & 00/100 DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby sell,
assign, transfer and set over to the Buyer, Telecorp Products, Inc., of 205 West Wacker Drive, Suite 1320, Chicago, Illinois 60606,
all property and other assets of Strand, Inc. pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated July 11, 2014 between Buyer
and Seller.


 


Seller hereby represents
and warrants to Buyer that Seller is the absolute owner of said property, that said property is free and clear of all liens, charges
and encumbrances, and that Seller has full right, power and authority to sell said property and to make this Bill of Sale.


 


If this Bill of Sale
is signed by more than one person, all persons so signing shall be jointly and severally bound hereby.


 


This Bill of Sale is effective end of business,
5:00 PM, CST, July 31, 2014.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Seller has signed and sealed this Bill of Sale this 31th day of July, 2014.


 


Strand, Inc.


By:  /s/ Timothy Beerup                 


Its:  President                                 


 


I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said County, in the State aforesaid, CERTIFY THAT Timothy Beerup             ,
personally known to me to be the same person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me
this day in person, and acknowledged that they signed, sealed and delivered the instrument as their free and voluntary act, for
the uses and purposes therein set forth.


 


Given under my hand and notarial seal this   31  st
day of July          ,2014.


 


	 	/s/ KRISTEN NICOLE CZERWONKA
	 	Notary Public
	 	 
	 	 
	 	KRISTEN NICOLE CZERWONKA
	 	Notary Public - Notary Seal
	 	State of Missouri
	 	County of Boone
	 	My Commission Expires June 3,2017
	 	Commission# 13489693
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 510
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0002]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor's name from Alpharma, Inc., to Alpharma LLC. The sponsor's mailing address will also be changed.
 DATES: This rule is effective September 3, 2010.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Newkirk, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-100), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-8307, email: *david.newkirk@fda.hhs.gov*.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alpharma, Inc., 440 Rte. 22, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 has informed FDA that it has changed its name and address to Alpharma LLC, 400 Crossing Blvd., Bridgewater, NJ 08807. Accordingly, the agency is amending the regulations in 21 CFR 510.600(c) to reflect this change. This rule does not meet the definition of “rule” in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of “particular applicability.” Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801-808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510 Administrative practice and procedure
Animal drugs
Labeling
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
 Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is amended as follows: PART 510—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
 1.The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as follows: Authority:
            21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e. 2.In § 510.600, in the table in paragraph (c)(1), revise the entry for “Alpharma Inc.”; and in the table in paragraph (c)(2), revise the entry for “046573” to read as follows: § 510.600
 (c) * * * (1) * * * Firm name and address
Drug labeler code*    *    *    *    *Alpharma LLC, 400 Crossing Blvd., Bridgewater, NJ 08807.
046573*    *    *    *    *
 (2) * * * Drug labeler code
Firm name and address*    *    *    *    *046573
Alpharma LLC, 400 Crossing Blvd., Bridgewater, NJ 08807.*    *    *    *    *
 Dated: August 31, 2010. Elizabeth Rettie, Deputy Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.


[FR Doc. 2010-22044 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0244 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 1 0, 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2023

01/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0244
#### Williams *v.*Cunningham.

An appellant from a justice’s court, must in his affidavit, point out specifically, on what point or ground, he alleges the judgment to be erroneous.

January 20, 1849.

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an assistant justice. The affidavit of the appellant stated the proceedings and the testimony in the court below, but did not specify any particular ground on which he appealed.

The Court

said, the code requires this expressly. (Code of 1848, § 303.) The appellant must put his finger on the point relied upon, or distinctly inform his adversary on what ground he alleges that there is error in the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.(a)

(a)

**In a subsequent case, *Sullivan*v. *McDonald,*April 28,1849, the affidavit set forth Various objections as having been taken at the trial and overruled, but did not'state the grounds on which the party appealed.

The bouRT dismissed the appeal because of this omission.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2606 

To require the termination of any employee of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs who is found to have retaliated against a whistleblower. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2014 

Mrs. MCCASKILL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the termination of any employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs who is found to have retaliated 

against a whistleblower. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES OF THE DE4 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WHO RE5 TALIATE AGAINST WHISTLEBLOWERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to chapter 12 of title 5, 

7 United States Code, including the right of an employee 

8 to obtain judicial review under section 1215(a)(4) of that 

9 title, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

10 employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs who is 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2606 IS

1 determined under section 1215 of that title to have vio2 lated paragraph (8), (9), or (13) of section 2302(b) of that 

3 title shall be terminated. 

4 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply to an 

5 act committed before, on, or after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                       433
<INVENTORY>                                     36,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,892
<PP&E>                                          16,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,474
<BONDS>                                         40,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,633
<SALES>                                        189,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,098
<CGS>                                          153,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,985)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,290)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,821
<EPS-BASIC>                                       $.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.23


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            30,842
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                         278
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  31,933
<CASH>                                          15,643
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              36,513
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,624
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 42,815
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  32,936
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,835
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        557
<COMMON>                                         1,179
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,623
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,713
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                924
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     296
<BENEFITS>                                       2,141
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        322
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2488 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2488

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exception to 
    the exclusive use requirement for home offices if the other use 
  involves care of a qualifying child of the taxpayer, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2014

 Mr. McConnell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exception to 
    the exclusive use requirement for home offices if the other use 
  involves care of a qualifying child of the taxpayer, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Working Parents Home Office Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIVE USE REQUIREMENT FOR HOME OFFICES FOR 
              CARE OF CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Section 280A(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Exception to exclusivity requirement for business use 
        of a dwelling unit.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A taxpayer shall not be treated 
                as failing to meet the exclusive use requirement of 
                paragraph (1) with respect to a portion of a dwelling 
                unit if the only other use of that portion is to care 
                for a qualifying child of the taxpayer while the 
                taxpayer is conducting the trade or business described 
                in paragraph (1).
                    ``(B) Qualifying child.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, the term `qualifying child' has the meaning 
                given to such term by section 152(c)(1), except that 
                only individuals bearing a relationship to the taxpayer 
                described in section 152(c)(2)(A) shall be taken into 
                account under section 152(c)(1)(A).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 66 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S5571]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

 Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, I rise today to commemorate the 
80th anniversary of the Armenian genocide.
  The Armenian genocide marks an ignominious chapter in world history. 
It reminds us how low unchecked hatred can drag the human spirit, 
unleashing cruelty and brutality. As we memorialize the Armenians who 
died needlessly in the genocide, we must resolve never to forget how 
they suffered at the hands of the Ottoman Empire.
  Nor can we forget how the Armenian people continue suffering today as 
the country struggles to cope with the devastating impact of 
Azerbaijan's blockade. The blockade has put a strangle-hold on the 
Armenian people. Necessities--like food and heating oil--are in scarce 
supply. Such shortages endanger the lives of many in Armenia, 
especially during the harsh winter months.
  While humanitarian assistance provided by the United States can help 
alleviate the suffering, it cannot lift the blockade. Only the 
Government of Azerbaijan can do that. That is why we must continue to 
apply pressure. We should not provide United States foreign assistance 
to Azerbaijan as long as it maintains its blockade of Armenia. The 
blockade should be lifted without delay.
  Mr. President, I hope my colleagues will join me in commemorating 
this anniversary. It is important that we remember the atrocities of 
the past, and support efforts to allow the Armenian people an 
opportunity to live in peace in the future.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 F-16CM ACCIDENT REPORT RELEASEDPublished Nov. 17, 2016
                        
                        By Headquarters ACC
                        
                        
                        Headquarters Air Combat Command, Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS) --**
                An Accident Investigation Board found that an F-16CM Fighting Falcon suffered an engine hardware malfunction resulting in its crash into a rural area in the U.S. Central Command Area of Responsibility on March 29.
The pilot sustained only minor injuries and has been released back to full duty status.  Owners of a field of crops damaged in the mishap, were compensated for their losses.  There were no other injuries or damages to other government or private property as a result of the crash.
The mishap occurred on an alert scramble two-ship night flight.
The AIB president identified a hardware malfunction in the engine as the cause of the aircraft mishap. 
According to the investigation report, the material failure of at least one turbine blade rendered the engine incapable of providing the necessary thrust to maintain continued flight, which triggered an unrecoverable stall.  Evaluation of the recovered engine by structural materials evaluation teams, engine overhaul experts and aerospace engineers concluded that the failure was caused by a turbine blade breaking loose, which subsequently damaged the other blades within the engine. 
The aircraft and crew were assigned to the 421st Fighter Squadron of the 388th Fighter Wing, Hill Air Force Base, Utah.
The total loss to the U.S. Government is estimated at $29.07 million.accident 



centcom 



ACC 



Hill AFB 



news release 



Accident Report 



investigation report 



f-16