alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Paul A. Toback, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:November 30, 2005 /s/ Paul A. Toback     Paul A. Toback
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: April 28Published April 28, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                
On this look around the Air Force, two F-35As deploy to Estonia for the first time, Global Strike Command Airmen test launch a Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, and the 500,000th person has graduated from the Community College of the Air Force. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller.F-35 



California 



Lightning II 



ICBM 



launch 



graduation 



CCAF 



Estonia 



ATAF 



CMSAF Kaleth Wright 



Around the AirForce 



Minuteman II 



Featured Videos 



Vandenberg AFB
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-Q of Point Capital,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: March 31, 2017



|By:    | /s/ Adam Wasserman                                                | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Adam Wasserman                                                    | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer(principal financial & accounting officer) | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Review Boards Agency Announces Changes to Application ProcessPublished Aug. 24, 2017
                        
                        By Air Force Review Boards Agency Staff
                **JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Review Boards Agency is changing the process by which Airmen, their families and veterans submit some applications for formal board consideration.
For those wishing there were easier ways to submit applications to the AFRBA, your voice is heard. Moving away from the traditional paper-only application method, effective immediately, those seeking to submit applications to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, the Air Force Discharge Review Board and the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review can formally submit applications electronically via email with expanded electronic “drop box” capability expected in September 2017 and additional web-based options available in the future.
“In a technologically-advanced age, when so much of what we accomplish in our lives and careers is done online, we felt that the agency needed to catch up and streamline its processes to make applicants’ lives easier,” said Mark Teskey, the Air Force Review Boards Agency director.
Teskey noted that despite the changes, the agency will still accept paper application packages for those preferring traditional delivery methods. However, he reiterated no matter which method applicants choose, the appropriate DOD form must be signed, either by wet signature or electronically, and the agency may require additional validation of applicant signatures. 
The non-statutory Air Force review boards adjudicate a wide-variety of decisions on behalf of the secretary of the Air Force and are comprised of 10 appellate-level administrative review boards (eight on behalf of the secretary of the Air Force and two on behalf of the secretary of Defense). The AFRBA receives approximately 15,000 cases annually from actively-serving total force Airmen (active duty, Air National Guard, Air Force Reserve and civilian employees), veterans and their families.
For information on application instructions, please visit **http://www.afpc.af.mil/Board-for-Correction-of-Military-Records/**.JB Andrews 



Secretary of the Air Force 



SecAF 



Heather Wilson 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Air Force Review Boards Agency 



AFRBA 



Department of Defense 



DOD 



Air Force Discharge Review Board 



applications 



Air Force 



AF 



joint base 



veterans 



active duty
News United States Air Force
 Paper or Plastic? CSAF returns to Ramstein rootsPublished Aug. 24, 2017
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Sharida Jackson
                        
                        
                        86th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                Beep. Beep. Beep. A cashier scans items and sends them down the conveyor belt to the bagger. ‘Baggers work for tips only’ are the words displayed on signs near the registers.
Baggers can range anywhere from teenagers to retirees. They might even go on to become four-star generals. 
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein recently visited the Ramstein Air Base Commissary, but this was not his first time here. As a teenager, he worked as a bagger in the 1970s while his family was stationed at Ramstein Air Base.
“I remember working here,” said Goldfein. “This was one of my first jobs and I’m thankful to have had the opportunity to work with such great people.”
Goldfein worked for Head Bagger Charlie Searchwell during his youth at Ramstein AB, who has worked at the commissary for nearly 50 years. Searchwell described Goldfein as hard working, friendly, and appreciative. 
“A lot of chiefs, colonels, and leaders come back,” Searchwell said. “They don’t forget their first job.”
Goldfein and Searchwell embraced and chatted briefly upon seeing each other, reminiscing on their time spent working together. 
“He was a great boss,” said Goldfein. “He had high standards and wouldn’t put up with folks not showing up on time.”
Goldfein passed through Ramstein AB on his way back to the states after visiting Airmen at various installations across the Middle East.
During the Ramstein AB visit, Goldfein met with baggers, greeted shoppers, and bagged groceries for customers with his former boss.
Chief Master Sgt. Jackie Harris, the 24th Intelligence Squadron superintendent, was stunned that the Air Force chief of staff was returning to his Ramstein AB roots as a bagger.
“He’s down here bagging groceries, you rarely see that,” said Harris. “This is servant leadership at its best.”Ramstein AB 



U.S. Air Forces Europe 



USAFE 



chief of staff og the Air Force 



CSAF 



David L. Goldfein 



Chief of Staff of the Air Force Deavd L. Goldfein 



commissary 



bagger 



Air Force 



AF 



air base
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2686 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2686

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the extension of 
 the tax collection period merely because the taxpayer is a member of 
    the Armed Forces who is hospitalized as a result of combat zone 
                               injuries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2014

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the extension of 
 the tax collection period merely because the taxpayer is a member of 
    the Armed Forces who is hospitalized as a result of combat zone 
                               injuries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wounded Warrior Tax Equity Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF EXTENSION OF TAX COLLECTION PERIOD FOR MEMBERS OF 
              THE ARMED FORCES WHO ARE HOSPITALIZED AS A RESULT OF 
              COMBAT ZONE INJURIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 7508(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Collection period after assessment not extended as a 
        result of hospitalization.--With respect to any period of 
        continuous qualified hospitalization described in subsection 
        (a) and the next 180 days thereafter, subsection (a) shall not 
        apply in the application of section 6502.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxes assessed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Kopin Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Sneider, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:

August 3, 2010By:

/S/    RICHARD A.
SNEIDERRichard A. SneiderChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6063

CLAYTON WILLIAMS, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

STEVEN RYAN, Physical Therapist; DWAIN M. BREWER, Officer, 

CO II; RODERICK R. SOWER, CCE Warden, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. 

(1:07-cv-03461-JFM) 

Submitted: May 15, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Clayton Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Clayton Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 2007) civil rights 

action. Williams’ notice of appeal was received in the district 

court shortly after the expiration of the thirty-day appeal 

period. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Because Williams is 

incarcerated and proceeding pro se, the notice is considered 

filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison 

officials for mailing to the district court. Fed. R. App. P. 

4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The date on 

which Williams properly delivered his notice of appeal to prison 

officials for mailing to the district court is not fairly 

ascertainable from the current record. 

Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited 

purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this 

information from the parties and to determine whether the filing 

was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston. The 

record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for 

further consideration. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

REMANDED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6063

CLAYTON WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. STEVEN RYAN, Physical Therapist; DWAIN M. BREWER, Officer, CO II; RODERICK R. SOWER, CCE Warden, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07-cv-03461-JFM)

Submitted: May 15, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clayton Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 2007) civil rights action. Williams’ notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after the expiration of the thirty-day appeal period. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Because Williams is incarcerated and proceeding pro se, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the district court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The date on which Williams properly delivered his notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing to the district court is not fairly

ascertainable from the current record. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston . The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 
 **INVISA, INC.**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Invisa, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Benedetti, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 */s/ David J. Benedetti*
 __________________________________
 David J. Benedetti
 Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 February 4, 2005
Order entered July 17, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00211
- CR
WAYNE ALBERT RODGERS , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F06
- 87728
- W 

### O RDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that t he supplemental clerk’s record include adocument explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimm ons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.1

                              FORM OF CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Linda Contreras, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of BRIGHTON OIL & GAS,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's  certifying officer I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and I have:

      (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared; and

      (b) evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
      and procedures and presented my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure  controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
      the report; and

      (c)  disclosed  in this  report any changes in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent  fiscal  quarter (the small  business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
      quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or
      is  reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
      control over financial reporting;

5. As the  registrant's  certifying  officer I have disclosed,  based on my most
recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's  auditors and the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) all material  weaknesses,  as well as significant  deficiencies in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize, and report financial information, have been disclosed;
      and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls.

Date:   August 20, 2007

/s/
----------------------------------
Name: Linda Contreras
Title: Chief Executive Officer