alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             589                     457
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,200                  11,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                       551                     512
<INVENTORY>                                     11,277                  13,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,723                  27,027
<PP&E>                                          34,849                  33,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,609                  25,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,221                  35,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,693                   9,397
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           377                     377
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,578                   9,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,221                  35,994
<SALES>                                         73,209                  89,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,209                  89,753
<CGS>                                           45,310                  59,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,660                  84,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   135                      31
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,891                   2,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,523                   2,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (950)                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,473                   2,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,473                   2,109
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66                     .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66                     .56


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FLOYD HATCHER.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
----

**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use of our audit report dated June 10,2009, on the consolidated financial statements of U.S. Geothermal Inc. as ofMarch 31, 2009 and 2008, as filed with the Form 10-K and by reference to theoutstanding Forms S-3 (333-158355), S-3A (333-151858) and S-8 (141262) aspreviously filed. 

/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S. *     *Williams & Webster, P.S. *Certified Public Accountants*Spokane, Washington 

June 15, 2009 

----
#### Robert Edward STANSBURY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 98-99004.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1998.

Paul M. Roadarmel, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California for respondent-appellant.

Harry Simon, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California for petitioner-appellee.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, FARRIS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Prisoner Robert Stansbury moves to dismiss the Warden’s appeal of the Order of the district court dated February 26,1998. That order denied the Warden’s Motion to Dismiss Stanbury’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Warden’s Motion to Dismiss was based on alleged deficiencies in the verification of the petition. After denying the motion to dismiss, the district judge declined the Warden’s request to certify the Order for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).

The district court’s Order denying the motion to dismiss is not a final decision of the district court. It is an interlocutory order and therefore, not subject to immediate appellate review. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. No exception to the final judgment rule, such as the collateral order doctrine, applies. *Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.,*485 U.S. 271, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction.

Stansbury’s Motion to Dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation, and Burdines, Inc., a Florida corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. MIAMI PARKING GARAGE, Inc., a Florida corporation, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

July 9, 1954.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1954.

J. W. Watson, Jr., Olavi M. Hendrickson and John H. Smith, Miami, for petitioner City of Miami.

Senerchia, Givens, Palmer, Quigg, Wol-farth, Evans & Correll, Evans, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston & Simmons, Thomas McE. Johnston and Thomas S. Trantham, Jr., Miami, for petitioner Burdines, Inc.

Paty, Downey & Paty, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

*844Morehead, Forrest, Gotthardt & Orr, Miami, for intervenors.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, SEB-RING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.

TERRELL, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Annual Report of Dorchester Minerals, L.P., (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Dorchester Minerals Management GP LLC,
General Partner of Dorchester Minerals Management LP, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                            
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                    |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ William Casey McManemin
|                    |  |  |  | William Casey McManemin    
|Date: March 8, 2006 |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 8, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ H.C. Allen, Jr.        
|                    |  |  |  | H.C. Allen, Jr.            
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00111-CR

NO. 03-06-00112-CR

Ex parte Reymundo Moreno

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 06-022-K26 & 06-060-C26,

HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismissthese companion appeals is granted. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2(a). The appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 31, 2006

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sbarro, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas McGrane, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2010                                                                     
|                                                                                            
|/s/ Nicholas McGrane                                                                        
|Nicholas McGrane Interim
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAY 18 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

JAMES COVINGTON,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 98-7131

(D.C. No. 97-CR-58-S)

(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, KELLY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Covington entered a plea of guilty to interstate domestic violence, 18

U.S.C. § 2261(a)(2), and was sentenced to 97 months imprisonment and three

years supervised release. With an offense level of 27 and a criminal history

category of II, Mr. Covington was sentenced at the top of the guideline range of

78-97 months. See USSG ch. 5, part A (Sentencing Table). He now appeals,
- 2 -

contending that the district courts improperly sentenced him at the top of the

guideline range. We lack jurisdiction to interfere with the district court’s

discretion to sentence within the guideline range; no exceptional conditions have

been shown. See Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 97 (1996); United States v.

Smith, 81 F.3d 915, 920 (10th Cir. 1996).

Counsel, having filed an Anders brief, has moved to withdraw as attorney

of record. The motion is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00139-CV

ARBOR E&T, LLC, D/B/A RESCARE WORKFORCE SYSTEMS

v.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD, INC., D/B/A 

WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, INC.

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-2213-11-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2013
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES ROES.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
PFGI CAPITAL CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of PFGI Capital Corporation
(PFGI Capital) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
Report), I, Christopher J. Carey, President (Principal Executive Officer) of
PFGI Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PFGI Capital.

/s/ Christopher J. Carey
Christopher J. Carey President (Principal Executive Officer)

March 9, 2004

[A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PFGI Capital Corporation and will
be retained by PFGI Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7934

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLTON ALBERT BROADNAX,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CR-93-171, CA-95-186)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Albert Broadnax, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge

Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Broadnax, Nos. CR-93-171; CA-95-186 (W.D. Va. Nov. 15, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James W. McLane, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and John M. Carradine, Chief Financial
officer, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. By: /s/ James W. McLaneJames W. McLaneChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2004By: /s/ John M. CarradineJohn M. CarradineChief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2004
 Page 25 of 25
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Robert G. Crockett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Ecology Coatings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Ecology Coatings, Inc.
 
 By:

/s/Robert G. CrockettRobert G. CrockettChief Executive Officer

(Authorized Officer)

January 14, 2011
  I, Kevin P. Stolz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Ecology Coatings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Ecology Coatings, Inc.
 
 By:

/s/Kevin P. StolzKevin P. StolzChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

January 14, 2011
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

February 11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00081-CV

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-36379

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 8, 2022, relator State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 

Company filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief

in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In 

the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding 

judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate its January 11, 2022 

order granting plaintiff’s motion to compel deposition, deny plaintiff’s motion to 
2

compel, and require plaintiff to pay the professional fees associated with plaintiff’s 

deposition of Rex Marco, M.D. 

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s request for temporary relief and relator’s petition 

for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Advance Display Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Advance Display Technologies, Inc. and funished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



/S/ MATTHEW W. SHANKLE
-------------------------------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial
Officer

May 13, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.21


                            [LETTERHEAD OF INSYNQ]
                       Your Internet Utility Company(TM)


September 22, 2000


     RE: Extension of the filing by Insynq, Inc. (the "Company") of the
     Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (the "Registration Statement")

To the parties attached on Exhibit A hereto:
                           ---------

     Due to our need for additional financing, we request that you, the
undersigned stockholder of the Company, agree to extend the filing date of the
Registration Statement which is required under your applicable Registration &
Repurchase Agreement to October 3, 2000.

          If you agree to this extension, please sign below and return this
executed letter to Lisa A. Genecov, Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP, 2200 Ross Avenue,
Suite 2200, Dallas, Texas, 75201.

                                        Best Regards,

                                        //s// John P. Grost

                                        John P. Gorst
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


The undersigned hereby consents to extend the filing of the Registration
Statement to October 3, 2000.


                                             /s/ Anthony Heller
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        By: ____________________________________
                                        Name: Anthony Heller
                                              ----------------------------------
                                        Title: President
                                              ----------------------------------