T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A D I S O N P O W E R , am i nor , bya nd th r o u g h K e llya n d L is aP o w e r , h e rp a r e n ts an d g u ard i an s, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. G IL B E R T P U B L IC S C H O O L S , an A r i z o n ap o l i t i c a l e n t i ty ; CA N D I CE G O N Z A L E S , w i fe and i n h eri nd i vi du al a n d o f f ic ia l c ap a c itya s g ir ls b a s k e tb a ll c o a c h o f M e s q u i t e H i g h Sc h o o l ; J O SH GO NZ AL E S , h u s b a n d ; B R AD L E Y K . B A R R E T T , hu sband and D r. i n h i s off i ci al a nd i ndi vi dua l c apa c i tya s s upe r i nt e nde nt o f Gi l b e rtP u b l i c S c h o o l s ; B R AD L E Y K . B A R R E T T , M rs . , w i fe ; D A V ID A L L I S O N , hus ba nd, i n hi s of f i c i a l a nd i ndi vi dua l c apa c i tya s a s s i s t a nt su p eri n t en d en to f G i l b ertP u b l i c S ch o o l s; D A V ID A L L IS O N , M rs . , w i fe ; D O M IN IC M A R C H I A N D O , h u s b a n d a n d in h is offi ci al and i nd i vi du al capaci ty a s p r in c ip a l o f

M e s q u ite H ig h S c h o o l; D O M IN IC M A R C H IA N D O , M rs . , w i fe , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 15149 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 2 5 8 4 - J AT ME MOR AN DU M * 

# FI LED OC T 14 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he H onor abl e C orm a c J . C a rne y , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f orthe ** C e ntr a l D i s tr i c tof

C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

2 A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a m e s A . T e i l bor g, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 14, 2011 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: T H O M A S and R A W L IN S O N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and C A RN E Y , D i stri ct Judg e. ** P l a i nt i f f - A ppe l l a ntM a di s on P ow e rappe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rgr a nt i ng s um m a ryj udgm e nti n f

a vorof D e f e nda nt s - A ppe l l e e s G i l be rtU ni f i e d S c hool D i s tr i c t( “ G i l be rtP ubl i c S c hool s ” ) , D r . B r a dl e yB a rr e tt , the s upe r i nt e nde ntof G i l b ertP u b l i c S ch o o l s, D r. D av i dA l l i so n , th e assi st an tsu p eri n t en d en t , an dM s. C andi ce G on za l es (c ol l ec t i vel y “ A pp el l ee s” ), i n P ow er ’ s a ct i on for s ex di s c r i m i na t i on. P ow e ra l l e ge s tha tw hi l e s he w a s am e m be rof the M e s qui t e H i gh S c hool va r s i tygi r l s ’ ba s ke tba l l t e a m , he ra s s i s t a ntc oa c h a nd G onz a l e s ’ hus ba nd, M r. Josh G on za l es , m ade i napp ropri at e s exual re m arks t o h erand sever al other g ir ls . P o w e ra lle g e s th a t a f te rs h e r e p o rte dM r . G o n z a le s ’ r e m a rk s to th e M e s q u ite H i g h S ch o o l ad m i n i strat i o n an d th e G i l b ertP u b l i c S ch o o l s ad m i n i strat i o n , M s. G o n z a l e s , M r . G o n z a l e s ’ w i f e a n dth e h e a dc o a c h o f th e v a r s i tyb a s k e tb a l l t e a m, re t al i at ed agai nsther and thatthe other m em bers of the vars i ty bas ketbal l t eam3

h arassed h er. P o w er b ro u g h tcl ai m s o f i n t en t i o n al sex d i scri m i n at i o n ag ai n st G i l be rtP ubl i c S c hool s pur s ua ntt o T i t l e I X of the E duc a t i ona l A m e ndm e nt s of 1972, 20 U . S . C . § 1681( a ) ( 2006) , a nd a ga i ns tthe i ndi vi dua l de f e nda nt s pur s ua nt to 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 . W e r e v ie w th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t de no vo , R a m i rez v. C i t

y o f B u en a P a rk , 5 6 0 F . 3 d1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) , a n dwe m a ya f f i rm the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s gr a ntof s um m a ryj udgm e nton a nygr ound s u p p o rte d b yth e r e c o r d , Cm t y. B a n k o f A ri z. v. G . V . M. T ru st , 366 F . 3d 982, 984 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f

f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm enti n favor of G i l bert P u b lic S c h o o ls o n P o w e r ’s T itle I X c la im f o rs e x d is c r im in a tio n b e c au s e P o w e rd id n o t r a is e ag e n u in e is s u e o f m a te r ia l f

a c t r e g a r d in g w h e th e rG ilb e rt P u b lic S c h o o ls r e s ponde d t o he rc om pl a i nt s aboutM s . G onz a l e s ’ c onduc torhe rpe e r s ’ ha r a s s m e nt w ith d e lib e r a te in d if

f e r e n c e . See D avis N

ex t Fri end L aSho nda D . v. Mon roe Cnt y. B d. of E du c. , 52 6 U . S . 62 9, 63 3 (19 99 ) ( stud ent -on-stud entse xu al hara ss m ent ); G e b s e rv . L a g o V

is ta I n de p . Sc h . D is t. , 524 U . S . 274, 290–91 ( 1998) ( t e a c he r - ons tu d e n t s e x u a l h a r a s s m e n t) . I n o r d e rto s h o w th a t G ilb e rt P u b lic S c h o o ls r e s ponde d t o P ow e r ’ s c om pl a i nt s w i th de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e , P ow e rm us ts how thatthe re spon se w as “ cl earl y unrea sonabl e i n l i gh tof the kn ow n ci rc um st ance s. ” D a v is , 526 U . S . a t648. P ow e rdi d notpr e s e nta nys uc h e vi de nc e . I n f a c t , the4

r e c o r d s h o w s th a t G ilb e rt P u b lic S c h o o ls o f f ic ia ls tim e lya n dth o r o u g h ly i nve s t i ga t e d a nd r e s ponde d t o e a c h of P ow e r ’ s c om pl a i nt s aboutM s . G onz a l e s a nd s e v e r a l m e m b e r s o f

th e v a r s ityg ir ls ’ b a s k e tb a ll te a m . S um m a ryj udgm e nton P ow e r ’ s § 1983 c l a i m ba s e d on the E qua l P r ot e c t i on C l aus e w a s a l s o w a rr a nt e d. A l though r e t a l i a t i ng a ga i ns tape r s on f orr e port i ng s e x u a l h a r a s s m e n t is a r g u ab lyav io la tio n o f th e E q u a l P r o te c tio n C lau s e , se e A la s ka v . EE OC , 564 F . 3d 1062, 1069 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( e n ba nc ) , P ow e rdi d not pres entany e vi dence t o rai se a genui ne i ss ue of m at er i al fa ctre gardi ng w hether M s . G o n z a le s , D r . B a rr e tt, a n d D r . A llis o n r e ta lia te do ro th e rw is e in te n tio n a lly di s c r i m i na t e d a ga i ns the r . P ow e ronl ypr e s e nt e d e vi de nc e tha tM s . G onz a l e s m a de a few sn i d e rem ark s t o h er o r ab o u th er; sh e p resen t ed n o ev i d en ce th atM s. G on za l es t oo k any advers e a ct i on agai nsther or tre at ed her any di ff er ent l y than a n yo th e rme mb e ro f

th e v a r s i tyb a s k e tb a l l t e a m. Se e Ha rda g e v . CB S B roadcast i ng, Inc. , 427 F . 3d 1177, 1189 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha ts ni de re m arks and thi nl y vei l ed threa t s do n otam ou ntt o an adv er se ac t i on for purpo se s o f aT itle V I I r e ta lia tio n c la im ) . P o w e ra ls o d idn o t p r e s e n t s u f f ic ie n t e v id e n c e to c r e a t e atr i abl e i s s ue r e ga r di ng w he the rM s . G onz a l e s e nc our a ge d ordi r e c t e d the m em bers of the vars i ty bas ketbal l t eam t o h ar as s her , or thatD r. B arre ttor D r. A llis o n r e ta lia te d o ro th e rw is e in te n tio n a llyd is c r im in a te da g a in s t h e ro n th e b a s is5

o f s e x . Se e J

ac k s on v . C i t

yof B r e m e r ton , 268 F . 3d 646, 653 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( hol di ng tha tf

oras upe rvi s ort o be l i abl e i n hi s i ndi vi dua l c apa c i tyunde r§ 1983 the pl ai nt i ff

m ustshow thathe “ w as pers on al l y i nv ol ved i n the const i tut i on al d ep riv atio n o r a su ff

icien t cau sa l co n n ec ti o n ex ists b etw ee n th e s u p er v iso r’s u n la w f u l c o n d u c t a n d th e c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n ” ) ; T .E . v . G r in d le , 599 F . 3d 583, 588 ( 7th C i r . 2010) ( c onc l udi ng tha tw he r e unde r l y i ng c ons t i tut i ona l vi ol a t i on re qu i re s s ho w i ng of i nt ent i on al di sc ri m i nat i on , pl ai nt i ff s m ustal so show that s upe rvi s orpos s e s s e d the r e qui s i t e di s c r i m i na t oryi nt e nt ) ( c i t i ng A s hc r of t v . I qbal , 1 2 9 S .C t. 1 9 3 7 , 1 9 4 8

– 4 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) . F i nal l y, the di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm enti n favor of D r. B arrett , D r. A l l i so n , an d M s. G o n zal es o n P o w er’ s § 1 9 8 3 cl ai m b ased o n th e F i rst A m en d m en tb ecau se P o w er w ai v ed h er F i rstA m en d m en tcl ai m b y fai l i n g t o rai se it in o p p o s itio n to th e A p p e lle e s ’ m o tio n f o rs u m m a ryju d g m e n t. Je nki ns v. Cnt y. of R i v e rs i de , 3 9 8 F .3 d 1 0 9 3 , 1 0 9 5 n .4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . A FFI R M ED .