alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2398 

To amend a provision of title 49, United States Code, relating to motor 

vehicle safety civil penalties. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2014 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. NELSON) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend a provision of title 49, United States Code, 

relating to motor vehicle safety civil penalties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Automaker Account5 ability Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOTOR VEHICLE CIVIL PENALTIES. 

7 Section 30165(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

10 (A) in the first sentence— 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2398 IS

1 (i) by inserting ‘‘or causes the viola2 tion of’’ after ‘‘violates’’; and 

3 (ii) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘$25,000’’; and 

5 (B) by striking the third sentence; 

6 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

7 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

8 ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000’’; and 

9 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

10 second sentence; and 

11 (3) in paragraph (3)— 

12 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘or 

13 causes the violation of’’ after ‘‘violates’’; 

14 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

15 ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$25,000’’; and 

16 (C) by striking the third sentence. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### EMANUEL RABIN v. HY RABIN.

October 3, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10007

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

BALDEMAR GONZALEZ

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CR-130-2

--------------------

November 13, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se, Baldemar Gonzalez appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute

cocaine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Gonzalez has filed a

motion to supplement the record and a motion for leave to file an

out-of-time reply to the Government’s opposition to his motion to

supplement the record. These motions are DENIED. Gonzalez has

also filed a motion to extend the time for filing a reply brief
and a motion to have the reply brief considered timely filed due

to mitigating circumstances. These motions are GRANTED.

Gonzalez argues that the district court erred in attributing

3.5 kilograms of cocaine to him because the negotiated sale of

that amount was never consummated. The district court did not

clearly err in finding that the negotiated, but unconsummated,

sale of 3.5 kilograms of cocaine by Gonzalez to an undercover

officer was a separate transaction from the transaction which led

to Gonzalez’s arrest. See United States v. Morris, 46 F.3d 410,

422 (5th Cir. 1995). Moreover, a de novo review of the record

reveals no error in the district court’s application of the

sentencing guidelines to the facts of Gonzalez’s case. See

United States v. Cothran, 302 F.3d 279, 286 (5th Cir. 2002).

Gonzalez also asserts, for the first time on appeal, that

the Government breached the plea agreement in his case by

advocating that he be held accountable for a drug quantity higher

than that stipulated to in the factual resume which formed the

basis for the guilty plea. Gonzalez has not shown that his

interpretation of the plea agreement was reasonable; thus he has

not shown plain error with respect to this claim. See United

States v. Reeves, 255 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 2001). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 232 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 232

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

 Mr. Hatch (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Donnelly, Mr. 
 Burr, Mr. Franken, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Casey, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Ayotte, 
  Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coburn, Ms. 
 Collins, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Moran, 
  Mr. Portman, Mr. Risch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Thune, and Mr. 
    Wicker) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Device Access and Innovation 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking subchapter E.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (a) of section 4221 of such Code is amended 
        by striking the last sentence.
            (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6416(b) of such Code is 
        amended by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of subchapter for chapter 32 of 
such Code is amended by striking the item related to subchapter E.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5


               CONSENT OF WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.


     We consent to all references to our firm, including any references to our
firm as experts, in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Pure Resources,
Inc., which includes the Proxy Statement/Prospectus relating to the proposed
merger of Titan Exploration, Inc. with and into TRH, Inc.


                                        WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.


Midland, Texas
April ___, 2000
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I,Brett A. Kramer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      the Annual Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                     the information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Brett A. Kramer |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | Brett A. Kramer |
|   | Title:              | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:               | March 30, 2010 |

 

----
MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS
PCAOB REGISTERED





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10KSB of Natco
International Inc, of our report dated June 21, 2007 on our audit of the
financial statements of Natco International Inc as of March 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the years then ended, and the reference to us under the
caption "Experts."








/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered
Moore & Associates Chartered
Las Vegas, Nevada
July 16, 2007



















2675 S Jones Blvd Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 702-253-7499
Fax 702-253-7501
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 3.1(b)
                                                                  --------------
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY

               Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation
                          Law of the State of Delaware

     Miller Exploration Company, a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies:

     FIRST, that the board of directors of the Corporation duly adopted
resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware and directing that such amendment be submitted to the stockholders of
the Corporation for their approval:

     "RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems and
declares advisable and approves an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation to amend the first paragraph of Article IV to read in its
entirety as follows:

     The total authorized capital stock of the corporation is 40 million
(40,000,000) shares of common stock, $.01 per value per share, and 2 million
(2,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share.

     SECOND, that the previously stated amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation was duly adopted by the stockholders of the
Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 and of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

                                       1
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate this 25th
day of June, 1999.

                              MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY



                              By:     /s/ Wm. J. Bumgartner
                                      ------------------------------
                              Name:   Wm. J. Bumgartner
                                      ------------------------------
                              Title:  VP Finance
                                      ----------------------------

                                       2
#### Charles WHITNEY, Appellant, v. L & L REALTY CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 17904.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

June 29, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1972.

Wm. Andress, Jr., Andress & Woodgate, Dallas, for appellant.

Richard L. Jackson, Johnson, Bromberg, Leeds & Riggs, Dallas, for appellee.

GUITTARD, Justice.

This is a companion case to No. 17,905, 482 S.W.2d 944, Parnass v. L & L Realty Corporation, today decided. The record is exactly the same except for one difference in the petition. Here the jurisdictional allegations are as follows:

> “At the time this cause of action arose, the Defendant was a resident of Dallas County, Texas, and the indebtedness alleged in this petition against Defendant arose out of business in which the Defendant engaged in this state. Defendant now is a resident of the State of Colorado and resides at 2927 Mesa Road, Apartment A, Camelback Village, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80904. *The Defendant has neither maintained a regular place of business in this state nor has appointed an agent upon whom service may be made upon causes of action arising out of such business’’*(Emphasis added.)

The difference is in the language underlined, which does not appear in *Par-nass.*Since this language is equivalent to an allegation that defendant “does not maintain a place of regular business in this State or a designated agent upon whom service may be made,” it.is not subject to criticism based on the omission of this language, as in McKanna v. Edgar, 388 S.W.2d 927 (Tex.Sup.1965). Defendant does not suggest any reason why the above alie-*121gat i on in this case is not sufficient, and we hold that it is sufficient.

For the reasons given in the *Par-nass*opinion we also hold that no proof of the jurisdictional allegations is necessary and that proof of mailing by the Secretary of State is not required.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the “**Company**”) for the period ended June 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Nicholas J. Holland, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

**1****                                     **TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

**2****                                     **Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:November 24, 2006

 
| /s/ Nicholas J. Holland |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Nicholas J. Holland     |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, AT&T Wireless Services
          Note-Backed Series 2002-7 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on
          Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust
          filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
          annual report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 28, 2005


      /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
---------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Vice President
Annual Certification   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Findexa II and Findexa I (together, the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2002 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: May 1, 2003 |                                                               
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                  | /s/PETER DARPÖName: Peter Darpö
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 1, 2003 |                                                               
|                  | /s/ERIK DAHLName: Erik Dahl
Title: Chief Financial Officer    

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Jacobs
Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Brett A. Kramer, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Brett A. KramerName:

Brett A. KramerTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2011
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

February 11 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00081

- CV

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th Distr i ct Court Harris C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 36379



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 8, 2022 , relator State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed a petition for writ of m andamus and a motion for temporary relief
in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also T ex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate its January 11, 2022 order granting plaintiff’s mo t ion to compel deposition, deny plaintiff’s motion to2

compel, an d require plaintiff to pay the professional fees associated with plaintiff’s deposition of Rex Marco, M.D.

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, w e deny relator’s request for temporary relief and relator’s petition
for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists o f Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           6,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,254)
<INVENTORY>                                     68,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,509
<PP&E>                                         109,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                (67,929)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              116
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,986
<SALES>                                        155,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,160
<CGS>                                          110,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,414)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)
        

</TABLE>