alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-3.htm










Exhibit 10.3


 


This Agreement is entered into as of May 20, 2014 by and between Gerald Modesitt Trust U/A/D 12/9/83 (“Trust”) and Generation Zero Group, Inc. (“GNZR”).







RECITALS:








	
A.  

	
 GNZR executed that certain promissory note (“NOTE”) on November 4, 2010 in the original principal amount of $250,000 with Gerald Modesitt (“GM”) as the Holder.








	
B.  

	
GM assigned his interest in the Note as Holder to Trust upon receipt of the Note.








	
C.  

	
GNZR is in default of its obligations of the Note for the failure to make all required payments under the Note.








	
D.  

	
Trust and GNZR desire to amend the Note and enter into certain agreements in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement.












NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:








	
1.  

	
All past defaults under the Note shall be waived by Trust, but the amount of principal and accrued interest up through January 13, 2014 shall not be forgiven.








	
2.  

	
Payments on the Note shall be deferred and interest under the Note shall stop accruing beginning January 13, 2014 until GNZR commences making payments and accruing interest under the senior secured notes (“Senior Notes”) which are secured by the URL www.find.com, mirroring all deferral and waivers by the holders of the Senior Notes.








	
3.  

	
Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the Note shall be in default if GNZR is in default of the Senior Notes the holder(s) of said obligations pursue default remedies and obtain a judgment and/or foreclose or take possession of collateral if applicable.








	
4.  

	
Except as modified by this Agreement, the Note shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, including without limitation all default remedies.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.














	GERALD MODESITT TRUST U/A/D 12/9/83     	
Generation Zero Group, Inc.


	  	
 


	  	  
	


/s/ Gerald Modesitt, Trustee



	
By /s/ Richard M. Morrell


	
Gerald Modesitt, Trustee    

	
       Richard M. Morrell, CEO







 









Please return via fax to 704-631-4541 or to Tina Cheney, CFO @ tina.cheney@gmail.com.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2373 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety 

or gun violence prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Ms. WARREN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIRE4 ARMS SAFETY OR GUN VIOLENCE PREVEN5 TION. 

6 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers 

7 for Disease Control and Prevention $10,000,000 for each 

8 of fiscal years 2015 through 2020 for the purpose of conVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:53 May 27, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2373.IS S2373

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2373 IS

1 ducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun 

2 violence prevention under the Public Health Service Act 

3 (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be ap4 propriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any 

5 other amounts authorized to be appropriated for such pur6 pose. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VCG Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Troy H. Lowrie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: | March 31, 2006
|------ | --------------



/s/ Troy H. LowrieTroy H. LowrieChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ISM AEL M ENDOSA-HER NANDEZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-71594 Age n c y No. A091-009-873 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 15, 2013 * * B e fore : FISHER , GOULD, a nd B YB EE, C irc uit Judge s. Ism a e l M e n dosa -He rnande z , a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o , pe t itions for re vie w of a

n orde r of the B oa

rd of Im m igrat ion Appe a ls (“ B IA” ) dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for c anc e lla tion of re m ova l . Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e 

# FIL ED OCT 25 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w de novo que stions of la w. Banue los-Ay o n v . Holde r , 611 F.3d 1080, 1082 (9th C ir. 2010). W e d e ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA c orre c t ly

c onc lude d tha

t e a c h of M e ndosa -He rnande z ’ s 2007 a nd 2010 c onvic tions unde r C a lifornia Pe n a l C ode § 273.5(a), whic h re sulte d in 5- a nd 3-y e ar prison se n te nc e s, re spe c tive ly , c onstitute s a n a ggravate d-fe lony

c rim e of viole nc e unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1101(a)(43)(F) that re nde rs him sta tutorily ine ligibleto se e k c anc e l lation of re m ova l. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1229b(a)(3); se e also Banue los-Ay on , 611 F.3d a

t 1083 (“ [A] c onvic t ion unde r C a lifornia Pe n a l C ode § 273.5(a) is c ate goric a lly

a c rim e of viole nc e . . . .” ). W e m u st re je c t M e ndosa -He rnande z ’ s c ha lle n ge to this c ourt’ s de c ision in Banue los-Ay on . Se e Aragy an v . Holde r , 646 F.3d 672, 677 (9th C i r. 2011) (“ A thre e -judge pa

ne l [ge n e ra l ly ] c a

nnot re c onside r or ove rrule c irc uit pre c e de nt . . . .” ); se e also BMW of N . Am., Inc . v . Gore , 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (“ [O] nly sta te c ourts m ay

a uthorita tive ly c onstrue sta

te sta tute s.” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 2 - 7 1 5 9 4 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 20-2009]

                    Based on a request from Dow Corning Corporation (Dow Corning), the rebuttal period on the preliminary recommendation for the application for                           ( print page 52928)                        subzone status at the Dow Corning facilities in Carrollton, Elizabethtown and Shepherdsville, Kentucky (75 FR 31763, 6/3/2010) is being extended to October 1, 2010 to allow additional time for the submission of rebuttal comments. Original submissions shall be sent to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230. An electronic copy shall be submitted to                     *ftz@trade.gov.*

                    For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at                     *Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-0473.                

Dated: August 24, 2010.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-21571 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
News United States Air Force
 Yesterday's Air Force: Hickam 75 years after Pearl HarborPublished Dec. 12, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- 75 years ago, the world changed as U.S. military installations across Hawaii were devastated in an attack by the Japanese military. Look back at how the events of the Pearl Harbor attack changed Hickam Air Force Base.
Yesterday's Air Force is a history and heritage featurette series profiling significant people and missions from the Air Force's past.heritage 



 



Pearl Harbor 



Hickam AFB 



YAF
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-784V Filed: August 4, 2015 (Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * KRISTIN LINTZ, *
* Petitioner, * v. * Stipulation; Attorneys’ Fees & Costs
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
* Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Carol Gallagher, Esq., Carol L. Gallagher, Esquire, LL C, Linwood, NJ for petitioner.
Debra A. Filteau Begley, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORN EY FEES AND COSTS 1

Gowen , Special Master:

In this case under the National V accine Injury Compensation Program, 2 I issued a decision adopting the parties’ stipulation on July 28, 2015, and awarded compensation to petitioner. On July 30, 2015, th e parties filed a Stipulation of Fact concerning attorneys’ fees and costs. Additionally, pursuant to Ge neral Order #9, petitioner’s counsel asserted that petitioner incurred no personal litigation co sts in this matter. Id. at para. 3.

The parties’ stipulation indicates that re spondent does not object to the amended

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explana tion for the action in this case, I intend to post this
decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' we bsite, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In
accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree
that the identified material fits w ithin this definition, I will delete such material from public access.

2 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq . (2012).amount of $38,481.68 in attorneys’ fees and cost that petitioner is requesting.

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(b) and (e )(1). Further, the pr oposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award:

 A lump sum of $38,481.68 in the fo rm of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel of record, Carol L. Gallagher, Esq., for petitioner’s attorney fees and costs.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. See
Vaccine Rule 11(a).
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2469 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2469

      To amend title 40, United States Code, to require that the 
 Administrator of General Services verify that a building to be leased 
  to accommodate a Federal agency is located a certain distance from 
    public transportation before entering into the lease agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2014

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Franken) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 40, United States Code, to require that the 
 Administrator of General Services verify that a building to be leased 
  to accommodate a Federal agency is located a certain distance from 
    public transportation before entering into the lease agreement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Services Accessibility 
Act'' or the ``GSA Act''.

SEC. 2. LEASE AGREEMENTS.

    Section 585(a) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Distance to public transportation.--
                    ``(A) Definition of public transportation.--In this 
                paragraph, the term `public transportation' has the 
                meaning given the term in section 5302 of title 49.
                    ``(B) Determination.--The Administrator of General 
                Services shall not enter into a lease agreement under 
                paragraph (1) unless the Administrator determines 
                that--
                            ``(i) the building (or improvement) to be 
                        leased would satisfy any requirement concerning 
                        access to public transportation listed in a 
                        proposed short form lease or solicitation for 
                        offers provided to each prospective offeror in 
                        accordance with section 570.203-3 of the 
                        Federal Acquisition Regulation (or successor 
                        regulations); and
                            ``(ii) if the short form lease or 
                        solicitation for offers contains a requirement 
                        concerning access to public transportation, the 
                        building (or improvement) is located not 
                        greater than a certain distance from public 
                        transportation that operates regularly 
                        throughout the normal business hours of the 
                        building (or improvement).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Matthew W. Shankle, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advance Display
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and I have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
          business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
          known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
          period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
          disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my
          conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
          procedures, as of the end the period covered by this report based on
          such evaluation;

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
          business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
          information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the small business
          issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005


/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                         Consent Of Independent Auditors


       We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-60134) and
related Prospectus of CSX Corporation for the registration of $1 billion of
securities and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated
January 23, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Conrail Inc. and subsidiaries included in CSX Corporation's Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2000 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
Richmond, Virginia                                             Norfolk, Virginia
May 14, 2001                                                   May 14, 2001
Exhibit 4

GRAPHIC

---

| |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants1250 René-Lévesque Boulevard West
Suite 2800
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H3B 2G4
Telephone +1 (514) 205 5000
Facsimile +1 (514) 205-5675
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of CAE Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2004, of our auditors' report dated May 11, 2004 on the
consolidated balance sheets of CAE Inc. as at March 31, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated statements of earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2004, and our related Comments by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference dated May 11, 2004.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-97185) of CAE Inc., relating to common shares to be
offered to employees under employee benefit plans, of our auditors' report dated May 11, 2004 relating to the above-mentioned financial statements and of our related Comments by Auditors for
U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences dated May 11, 2004.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants

Montreal,
Quebec
August 11, 2004

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and other members of the worldwide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organization.

---