alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-13-0052-CR 

________________________

Patrick Davis, Appellant 

 

v. 

 

The State of Texas, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court 

Oldham County, Texas 

Trial Court No. OCR-12B-011, Honorable Roland Saul, Presiding 

 

March 25, 2013 

 

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant Patrick Davis appeals from his conviction of intentionally or knowingly 

possessing a usable quantity of marijuana in an amount of fifty pounds or less but more 

than five pounds. The district clerk has requested an extension of time to file the record, 

stating that appellant has not submitted a request to prepare the record, nor has he paid 

or made arrangements to pay for the record. 
2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 222nd District 

Court of Oldham County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial 

court shall determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

 2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,

3. whether appellant is entitled to a free record or appointed counsel.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters 

(including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to 

represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental record and cause that record to be 

filed with this court by April 24, 2013. Should further time be needed to perform these 

tasks, then same must be requested before April 24, 2013. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
#### Harry M. LONG, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky ex rel. John B. BRECKINRIDGE, Attorney General, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 31, 1974.

Marion Rider, Frankfort, for appellant.

Joseph A. Biagi, Walter B. Smith, Shelbyville, Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner VANCE,

Affirming.*
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000135

03-JUN-2015

08:10 AM
Ohr Pharmaceutical, Inc. 10-K/A



Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jason Slakter, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Ohr Pharmaceutical, Inc; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: December
7, 2016



|/s/ Jason Slakter                                     | 
|----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Jason Slakter                                         | 
|Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00195-CV

No. 10-10-00196-CV

GERARDO BAZALDUA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 1997-662-C2 and 1999-420-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 13, 2010, the trial court signed orders in the underlying criminal 

cases for the payment of court costs out of Appellant Gerardo Bazaldua’s inmate 

account pursuant to Texas Government Code section 501.014. On April 28, Appellant 

filed a motion to rescind and dismiss those orders, and the trial court denied the 

motions on May 7.1 Appellant filed notices of appeal on May 24.

 

1 The motions asserted, among other things, that the costs had already been collected and paid out of 

Appellant’s inmate account.
Bazaldua v. State Page 2

A trial court retains plenary power to grant a new trial or to vacate, modify, 

correct, or reform a judgment (or an otherwise appealable final order) within thirty 

days after the judgment or order is signed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(d). Appellant’s 

April 28 motions were filed after the trial court’s plenary power as to the January 13 

orders had expired.

The notices of appeal must have been filed within 30 days after the January 13 

orders were signed, (see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)), or a motion for extension of time to file 

notice of appeal must have been filed within 15 days after the deadline for filing the 

notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

We notified Appellant in a letter dated June 8, 2010 that his appeals might be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he filed a response within 21 days showing 

grounds for continuing the appeals. Appellant has not responded. Nor has he alleged 

here or in the trial court that he did not receive notice of the January 13 orders. See TEX.

R. CIV. P. 306a(4). Appellant’s notices of appeal were untimely to invoke our 

jurisdiction in a direct appeal, and these appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

(Chief Justice Gray dissenting)

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 1, 2010

[CV06]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                        Washington, D.C.  20549

                             FORM 10 - QSB

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER REGULATION SB OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
                                 1934

For the Quarter Ended                           Commission File Number:
    June 30, 1996                                    2-96976-D

DCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.  (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in
                             its charter)

        COLORADO                                     84-1155041
(State or other jurisdiction             (IRS Employer Identification
of incorporation or organization)         Number)


           303 Linwood Avenue, Fairfield, Connecticut  06430
         (Address and zip code of principal executive offices)


  (203) 259-7713 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required by Regulation SB of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the
filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.

                     YES__X__              NO_____

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer/s
classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:

                                        Number of Shares Outstanding
      Class                                  August 2, 1996

Common Stock, $.0001 par value                  4,041,040

                                   
<PAGE>

                     DCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                               Exhibit Index


              Exhibit 27              Financial Data Schedule

                               

<PAGE>

                              SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                   DCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                   (Registrant)



Dated: December 3, 1996          By: Joseph J. Murphy
                                    Joseph J. Murphy
                                    President

                                  By: Larry Shatsoff
                                      Larry Shatsoff
                                      Acting Secretary

                                  12
# Fire Prevention Week, 2008

Fire Prevention Week is an opportunity to call attention to the importance of fire safety, especially in the home, and to honor our Nation's firefighters for their heroism.

Americans can help reduce home fires by taking simple steps such as regularly inspecting furnaces and fireplaces, keeping space heaters at least 3 feet from flammable materials, and checking the condition of electrical cords.  Making sure that smoke alarms and fire extinguishers work can also help minimize the impact of home and building fires.  I encourage all Americans to remember this year's theme—“It’s Fire Prevention Week:  Prevent Home Fires!”—and to check their homes for fire hazards to help prevent disasters.

Across our Nation, firefighters put themselves at risk to protect our communities, and their selfless dedication has saved countless lives.  America's Bravest hold a cherished place in our hearts, and we honor those who have paid the ultimate price to protect citizens in harm's way.  The sacrifice of these men and women is an inspiration to all and epitomizes the true meaning of heroism.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 5 through October 11, 2008, as Fire Prevention Week.  On Sunday, October 5, 2008, in accordance with Public Law 107-51, the flag of the United States will be flown at half staff on all Federal office buildings in honor of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service.  I call on all Americans to participate in this observance through appropriate programs and activities and by renewing their efforts to prevent fires and their tragic consequences.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this  third day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E8-24016

Billing code 3195-W9-P
EXHIBIT 10.4





SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE


BPO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.


2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN







WHEREAS, the BPO Management Services, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”) has been established by BPO Management Services, Inc. (the “Company”), effective upon its approval by the shareholders of the Company; and
 
 WHEREAS, the shareholders of the Company approved the Plan in June 2007; and
 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of Board of Directors of the Company have approved this Second Amendment to the Plan to be effective as of May 13, 2009;
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
 
 Section 5.6 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
 
 “ 5.6Termination of Employment or Service.    In the event of the termination of employment of an Optionee or the separation from service
of a Director or consultant (who is an Optionee) for any reason (other than death or Disability as provided below), any Option(s) held by such Optionee (or his Permitted Assignee) under the Plan and not previously exercised or expired shall be deemed canceled and terminated on the day of such termination or separation, unless the Committee decides, in its sole discretion, to extend the term of the Option for a period not to exceed twenty-four (24) months after the date of such termination or separation, provided, however,
that in no instance may the term of the Option, as so extended, exceed the maximum term set forth in Section 4.1(b)(ii) or 5.4, above.”
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BPO Management Services, Inc., acting by and through its officer hereunto duly authorized, has executed this instrument to be effective May 13, 2009.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BPO Management Services, Inc., acting by and through its officer hereunto duly authorized, has executed this instrument to be effective May 13, 2009.







BPO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.By:
/s/  J. Brent WebbName:  J. Brent WebbTitle:    SVP, General Counsel & Asst. Secretary
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7712

DARRICK M. ALEXANDER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 00728

- HEH )

Submitted : March 23, 2021 Decided: March 29, 2021

Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Darrick M. Alexander , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Darrick M. Alexander seeks to appeal the district court’s or der dismissing without prejudice his action, which the court docketed as one under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, for failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a ce rtificate of appealability and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Alexander v. Virginia , No. 3:20

- cv 00728

- HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

D ISMISSED
#### Monroe Evans v. George E. Collar et al.

*Sheriff*— Indemnity *bond*— Levy *on exempt property.*

1. A sheriff cannot demand indemnity for levying on exempt property, and is bound to know what his duty is in regard to any claim of exemption by the judgment debtor.1

3. A bond reciting a levy on property claimed by other persons than the execution defendant, and conditioned to indemnify the officer for taking and selling goods and chattels which he or his assistant “shall judge to belong to the said adverse parties,” is not ambiguous, and cannot be applied to anything beyond its terms.

Error to St. Joseph. (Pealer, J.)

Argued June 12, 1889.

Decided June 21, 1889.

Assumpsit on indemnity bond. Defendants bring error.

Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*C. W. W. Clarice*and *T. C. Carpenter,*for appellants.

*B. B. & L. F. Andrews,*for plaintiff.

1

 How. Stat. § 7711, provides that in case of *reasonable*doubt as to the *ownership*by a judgment debtor of any goods or chattels, or as to their *liability*to be taken upon an execution, the officer may require indemnity, etc. This section applies to writs of attachment, and, in case of a seizure under a promise to furnish the bond, the officer may release his levy on its non delivery. *Smith v. Cicotte,*11 Mich. 383.

Campbell, J.

This suit was brought on an indemnity *434bond given to plaintiff to indemnify him for the service of a writ of execution on a judgment in favor of George E. Collar against Julia Hirschfield. Plaintiff levied on personal property which belonged to her, but which was exempt, and Bhe sued him, and recovered damages for its conversion.

The bond recited the judgment, and that plaintiff had levied on property claimed by other persons than the defendant in the writ. The condition was to save harmless and indemnify plaintiff for taking and selling goods and chattels which he or his assistants *“*shall judge to belong to the said adverse parties.”

The property here belonged to the defendant in execution, and not to third parties. The sheriff could not demand indemnity for such property, and was bound to know what his duty was in regard to any claim of exemption. He did not procure indemnity against any such claim on behalf of Mrs. Hirschfield. The bond is in no way ambiguous, and cannot be applied to anything beyond its terms.

The judgment below, holding to the contrary, was erroneous, and must be reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted, inasmuch as the bond is not so set out in the declaration as to show the variance.

Sherwood, ü. J., Champlin and Long, JJ., concurred. Morse, J., did not sit.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 I, Lauri A. Wood, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Peoples Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements
of that section. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial operations and
results of operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ Lauri A. WoodLauri A. WoodChief Financial Officer and ControllerNovember 10, 2004Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         959,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,548,110
<PP&E>                                      30,639,192
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,955,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,231,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,600,266
<BONDS>                                     32,720,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,089,330)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,231,823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,510,366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,133,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               433,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,396,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                546,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            546,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   546,270
<EPS-BASIC>                                       8.25<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.64<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS Primary - Income Per Class A Unit
    EPS Diluted - Income Per Class B Unit
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of inventions available for license.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Energy hereby announces that the following invention is available for license, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207-209: U.S. Patent Application No. 12/401,033, entitled “Ground Potential Rise Monitor.”

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Annette R. Reimers, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property, U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 6F-067, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585; Telephone (202) 586-3815.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

35 U.S.C. 207 authorizes licensing of government owned inventions. Implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR 404.

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 27, 2010.

Paul A. Gottlieb,

Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property.

[FR Doc. 2010-2173 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)
                       AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


         I, John Weisickle, do hereby certify that I am the Vice
President/Finance of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California
corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its
capacity as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") dated as of May 1, 2002 among the Servicer, American Honda
Receivables Corp., as Seller, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware, as Owner
Trustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2002-2 Owner Trust and Citibank, N.A. as
Indenture Trustee as follows:

                  (i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
         eleven month period ended March 31, 2003, and of its performance under
         the Agreement has been made under my supervision;

                  (ii) To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon
         such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
         Agreement throughout such period; and

                  (iii) To the best of my knowledge and information, no Event of
         Default nor any event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time,
         or both, would become an Event of Default under the Agreement, has
         occurred or is continuing.

         This certificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section
3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective May 1, 2002, which terms and
conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of May,
2003.



/s/ John I. Weisickle
---------------------
Name:    J. I. Weisickle
Title:   Vice President/Finance
#### MIDDLE MOTOR COURT, INC. v. HARRY GIBSON AND CAROL BUCKMUSE.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.