alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph RICHARDS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 50069.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1975.

*68Jack W. Manning and Barry P. Helft, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Steve Wilensky and John Ovard, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery; punishment was assessed at seventeen years’ confinement.

In his sole ground of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting an oral statement made by appellant shortly after his arrest, in violation of Article 38.22, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Article 38.22 (1) (f) provides in part:

> “Nothing contained herein shall preclude the admissibility ... of any statement that is the res gestae of the arrest or of the offense.”

The record reflects that appellant was arrested at an apartment, handcuffed, given his Miranda warnings, and taken to the patrol car. On approaching the patrol car, appellant observed that his brother was in the car. The arresting officer testified, “He [appellant] asked me why I had his brother in the car, and I said he was under arrest for armed robbery, he said, ‘He didn’t do it, I did.’ ”

We find the admission of the statement was not in violation of Article 38.22, supra, on the basis of the above quoted provision of that article.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 27, 2004 (the "Report") as filed on the date hereof with the securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
August 6, 2004

| |  | /s/HAROLD W. INGALLSHarold W. Ingalls
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT B. TAYLOR.

November 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IN RE: THE NAME CHANGE OF RONALD RUSSELL JOHNSON.

No. 4D18-695

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Merrilee Ehrlich, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 17-11266 

(40).

Jason H. Haber of Haber | Blank, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner appeals the circuit court’s order denying his petition for 

a name change. The petitioner argues the circuit court erred in two 

respects: (1) by denying his facially sufficient petition without setting forth 

a factual basis for what appears, from the face of the order, to have been 

the circuit court’s conclusion that he sought the name change for an 

ulterior or illegal purpose; and (2) by denying his request to have a court 

reporter record the hearing.

We agree with both arguments. See In re Zimmer, 207 So. 3d 1006, 

1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Where a trial court denies a facially sufficient 

petition [for name change], the factual basis for doing so must be set forth 

in its order.”); Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.535(b) (“Any proceeding shall be 

reported on the request of any party.”).

We reverse and remand for a new hearing before a different judge, as 

the prior judge has since left the bench.

Reversed and remanded for new hearing.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                       741
<INVENTORY>                                      3,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,728
<PP&E>                                         153,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,705
<BONDS>                                        110,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,378
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,624
<SALES>                                         17,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,207
<CGS>                                           17,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,111
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,549
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,549
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share



         The following summarizes the weighted average common shares issued and
outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001:

                                                      2002             2001
                                                  ------------     ------------
         Common and common equivalent
           shares outstanding:
              Historical common equivalent
                shares outstanding                   7,832,895        6,776,962
              Weighted average common shares
                issued during period                    20,358          180,919
                                                  ------------     ------------
         Weighted average common shares
           outstanding - basic and diluted           7,853,253        6,957,881
                                                  ============     ============

               Net Loss                              1,260,220        1,922,477
                                                  ============     ============

         Net loss per basic and diluted share            (0.16)           (0.28)
                                                  ============     ============


         Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed
by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
increased for potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.
The dilutive effect of equity instruments is calculated using the treasury stock
method.

         Warrants to purchase 715,000 and 565,000 common shares as of December
31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were excluded from the treasury stock
calculation because they were anti-dilutive due to the Company's net losses.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7050

GLENN A. FROEMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Baltimore County Detention Center,Towson; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General of the State of Maryland; LILA NOBEL, Division of Parole and Probation; W. ROLAND KNAPP, Director, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 559-L) Submitted: August 13, 1996 Decided: August 30, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Glenn A. Froeman, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Froeman appeals from the district court's marginal order denying his motion for injunctive relief. We dismiss. The district court properly denied injunctive relief. Federal courts may not award declaratory or injunctive relief that would affect pending state criminal proceedings absent extraordinary circumstances involving federally protected rights. Younger v. Harris , 401 U.S. 37, 41 (1971). The record shows that Froeman wasstill seeking relief in the state appellate courts when the district court denied his motions for injunctive relief. See Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd. , 420 U.S. 592, 608 (1975). Furthermore, there are no extenuating circumstances in this case entitling Froeman to injunctive relief. We deny a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2319 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to require the public disclosure 

by trusts established under section 524(g) of such title, of quarterly 

reports that contain detailed information regarding the receipt and disposition of claims for injuries based on exposure to asbestos, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2014 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to require 

the public disclosure by trusts established under section 

524(g) of such title, of quarterly reports that contain 

detailed information regarding the receipt and disposition 

of claims for injuries based on exposure to asbestos, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Furthering Asbestos 

5 Claim Transparency Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘FACT Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2319 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 524(g) of title 11, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(8) A trust described in paragraph (2) shall, subject 

5 to section 107— 

6 ‘‘(A) not later than 60 days after the end of 

7 every quarter, file with the bankruptcy court a re8 port that— 

9 ‘‘(i) shall be made available on the court’s 

10 public docket; and 

11 ‘‘(ii) with respect to such quarter— 

12 ‘‘(I) shall describe each demand the 

13 trust received from, including the name 

14 and exposure history of, a claimant and 

15 the basis for any payment from the trust 

16 made to such claimant; and 

17 ‘‘(II) shall not include any confiden18 tial medical record or the claimant’s full 

19 social security number; and 

20 ‘‘(B) upon written request, and subject to pay21 ment (demanded at the option of the trust) for any 

22 reasonable cost incurred by the trust to comply with 

23 such request, provide in a timely manner any infor24 mation related to payment from, and demands for 

25 payment from, such trust, subject to appropriate 

26 protective orders, to any party to any action in law 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2319 IS

1 or equity if the subject of such action concerns li2 ability for asbestos exposure.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

4 This Act and the amendments made by this Act 

5 shall— 

6 (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of 

7 this Act; and 

8 (2) apply with respect to any case commenced 

9 under title 11 of the United States Code before, on, 

10 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-92,513-01, WR- 92,513-02, WR-92,513- 03, AND WR- 92,513-04

EX P ARTE MAX P ATRICK SADLER, App licant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS W02-74193-M(A ), W02-74191- M(A ), W02-74192- M(A )

AND W02- 74194-M( A) IN THE 194T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R Y , J., fi led a dis senting opi nion in w hich S L A U G H T E R , J., joined. K E L L E R , P .J., dissented. O P I N I O N Applicant enter ed open pleas of g uilty in these four case s to two char g es of ag g rava ted sexual assault of a child and two char g es of indece ncy with a child. Applicant was sentenc ed to fifty y ear s' imprisonment, thirty -five y ear s' imprisonment, twenty y ear s ’ i m p ri sonment and ten y ear s' imprisonment, to run concur rently

. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his convictions. Sadler v. State , Nos. 05-04-01814- CR, 05-04-01815- CR, 05-04-01816- CR and 05-04-01817- CR (Tex. App.

— Dallas Dec ember 14, 2005) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed these applications for writs of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded them to this2

Court. See T E X
. C O D E C R I M
. P R O C
. art. 11.07. Applicant co n t en d s , among other things, that appellate counsel failed to timely inform 1 Applicant of his rig ht to file a pro se petition for discretionar y revie w. Ba sed on the rec ord, the trial
court has deter

mined that appellate counsel' s perf ormanc e wa s deficie nt and that Applicant would have timely

filed a pe tition for discretionar y revie w but for c ounsel' s deficie nt perfor mance . Relief is g rante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S

. W

. 3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nts of the Fifth Court of Appea ls in cause numbers 05-04-01814- CR, 05-04-01815- CR, 05-04-01816- CR an d 0 5 -04-01817- CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition f or discretionar

y revie w, he must file it with this C ourt within thirty day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this op in io n s h a ll b e s e n t to th e Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: Fe bruar

y 2, 2022 Do not publish

This Court has review ed Applica nt’s other c laims and finds them to be without merit. 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANGEL COLON.

September 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


I, William G. Knuff, III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Knight Fuller, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: April 14, 2004         /s/ William G. Knuff, III
                             -------------------------
                             William G. Knuff, III
                             Co-chairman, Co-chief executive officer and
                             Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





_______________________________________





FORM 8-K





_______________________________________





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)


of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  November 21, 2018





_______________________________________





Kforce Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





_______________________________________





Florida000-2605859-3264661(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)(CommissionFile Number)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)





1001 East Palm Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33605


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (813) 552-5000





N/A


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


_______________________________________





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2). Emerging growth company. o


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o








---







Item 8.01Other Events.


On November 21, 2018, the Firm entered into a corporate stock repurchase plan (the “Plan”), which allows the Firm to repurchase outstanding common stock under a share repurchase program authorized by the Firm’s Board of Directors. The Plan is in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and effective on November 28, 2018. Purchases of common stock under the Plan are subject to certain price, market, volume and timing constraints specified in the Plan.








---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





KFORCE INC.(Registrant)November 26, 2018By:/s/ DAVID M. KELLYDavid M. Kelly,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)KFORCE INC.(Registrant)November 26, 2018By:/s/ JEFFREY B. HACKMANJeffrey B. Hackman,Senior Vice President, Finance & Accounting(Principal Accounting Officer)