alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert
G. Crockett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Ecology Coatings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on
Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Ecology Coatings, Inc.





By:
            
            /s/Robert
      G. CrockettRobert
      G. CrockettChief
      Executive Officer
              (Authorized
      Officer)
              May
      21, 2010




I, Kevin
P. Stolz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Ecology Coatings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on
Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Ecology Coatings, Inc.





By:
            
            /s/Kevin
      P. StolzKevin
      P. StolzChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
              May
      21, 2010
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Aurelia Energy N.V. (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kees Voormolen, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

Date
March 30, 2005

| |  | By: | /s/KEES VOORMOLEN                                                                     
| |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     | Kees Voormolen Vice President, Finance & Administration
Bluewater Energy Services B.V.

1

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Kinder Morgan Debenture-Backed Series 2002-6 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in such
distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 19, 2014



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ David J. Kolibachuk            
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000389 04-JUN-2015 11:02 AM
News United States Air Force
 Mobility Guardian draws to an endPublished Aug. 14, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Erin McClellan
                **JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, Wash. (AFNS)  --**
                Crews flew approximately 1,200 hours in eight days, executing almost 650 sorties during Exercise Mobility Guardian, July 31 to Aug. 12, 2017.During those missions, refueling aircraft offloaded roughly 1.2 million pounds of fuel, aerial port personnel processed 3,676 passengers and 4,911 tons of equipment and crews airdropped 356 paratroopers, 33 heavy platforms and approximately 300 Container Delivery System bundles.“I think (Mobility Guardian) was very beneficial because it was the first exercise in a long time where the sole focus was on the desired learning objectives of the mobility forces across the spectrum: contingency response, aeromedical evacuation, air mobility liaison officers, air refueling, airlift, airdrop and much more,” said Col. Johnny Lamontagne, the Mobility Guardian combined forces air component commander. Mobility Guardian included 54 aircraft from 11 nations and enabled personnel from 25 nations to enhance interoperability. “It was great for them to be able to see how we operate and for us to see how they operate,” said Lamontagne. “When the United States goes into combat, we go with our international partners, but we rarely get to train together. This was a great opportunity to integrate, so when we go into combat, it’s not the first time we’ve worked together. We already have some experience and understand each other’s capabilities.”The exercise included more than 3,500 U.S. service members and international partners who worked to measure the effectiveness of the Mobility Air Forces in contingency and humanitarian response operations.“Mobility Guardian was about learning, discovery and the opportunity to work as a part of a joint and coalition team,” said Gen. Carlton D. Everhart II, the commander of Air Mobility Command. “This exercise was an investment in ensuring our Airmen are prepared to succeed in the most challenging environments and deliver desired results across the globe.”Air Force 



exercise 



training 



Air Mobility Command 



AMC 



AF 



KC-135 



readiness 



coalition 



integration 



mobility 



F-15E 



Stratotanker 



Strike Eagle 



Mobility Guardian 



joint base 



JB Lewis-Mcchord
News United States Air Force
 AF announces medical squadron commanders for 2017Published Dec. 19, 2016
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force officials have selected 84 health professions officers for medical squadron command assignments worldwide in 2017.
Assignment bids were coordinated among medical group and wing commanders, senior raters and command surgeons.
“Squadron commanders are key to shaping our service culture and traditions as they develop, train and build Airmen,” said Lt. Col. Matthew Krauchunas, the Air Force Personnel Center Medical Service Corps Utilization and Education section chief. “These commanders will be leading the beating heart of our Air Force—squadrons.”
Typically, there are more qualified officers on the candidate lists than there are command vacancies to account for any unexpected contingencies during the year. Candidates who were not selected will remain eligible for command vacancies that open during the calendar year.
The selection list is posted to myPers. To view the list, select “Any” from the dropdown menu and search “Medical Squadron.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to the myPerswebsite. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.commander 



medical 



AFPC 



AETC 



Randolph AFB
#### FED-MART OF TEXAS, INC, Appellant, v. Robert S. CALVERT, Comptroller of Public Accounts, State of Texas, Appellee.

No. 11885.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Nov. 24, 1971.

*298Flahive & Ogden, T. P. Flahive, Austin, for appellant.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., John R. Grace and Camm Lary, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, for appellee.

SHANNON, Justice.

This is a tax refund suit filed by appellant, Fed-Mart of Texas, Inc. in Travis County to recover $10,993.76 paid under protest by appellant to appellee, Robert S. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts. Upon trial to the court, judgment was entered that appellant take nothing. We affirm that judgment.

The sum in controversy represents a penalty assessed against appellant for the late filing of the quarterly sales tax return. According to Article 20.05, Title 122A, Taxation-General, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, the law then controlling, the return should have been filed on January 31, 1965, but appellant mailed the return on February 1, 1965. January 31 was Sunday, and February 1 was the following Monday.

In 1967, the Legislature enacted Article 1.13 of Title 122A, Taxation-General, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, which ■ provides the Comptroller a measure of discretion theretofore unavailable.

Those sections of Article 1.13 applicable here follow:

> “Section (b) The postmark or receipt mark (if received by a common or contract carrier) will be prima facie evidence of the date that such report was deposited with the post office or the carrier. The'person making the report or the Comptroller may show by competent evidence that the actual date of posting was to the contrary.”

> “Section (e) If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the next business day thereafter will be considered to be the due date.”

> “Section (g) The Comptroller is hereby authorized to refund or issue credits for penalties and interest paid *solely*as a result of returns timely mailed but postmarked after the required filing date; provided, however, that no refund or credit shall be allowed for such penalties incurred prior to September 1, 1961 . .” (Emphasis added)

Appellant claims that the retroactive effect of section (g) applies to section (e) so that its mailing on February 1, 1965 entitles it to a return of the penalty.

Statutes are held to operate prospectively, unless a contrary construction is required by the plain and unequivocal language used. Piedmont and Arlington Life Insurance Co. v. Ray, 50 Tex. 511 (1878); Government Personnel Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wear, 151 Tex. 454, 251 S.W.2d 525 (1952). Section (g) limits its application solely to that situation wherein a taxpayer timely mails his report, but for some reason the post office incorrectly postmarks that report. Had the Legislature intended that section (e) be retroactive, it would have said so.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7145]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “The Roman Mosaic from Lod, Israel,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about September 28, 2010, until on or about April 3, 2011, the Legion of Honor Museum, San Francisco, California, from on or about April 23, 2011, until on or about July 24, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: August 25, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-21848 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES DE LISA.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STANLEY KRYZWONOS.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       74
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,151
<PP&E>                                           8,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              824
<BONDS>                                          2,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,709
<SALES>                                          2,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,589
<CGS>                                            2,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 118<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    183
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                167
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
<FN>
<F1>Net of interest income, $30 million, and capitalized interest, $9 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of EAU Technologies, Inc.
 1890 Cobb
International Blvd, Ste. A
 Kennesaw,
GA 30152
 
 
 As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 30, 2010 (which includes an
emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern), relating to the financial statements of EAU
Technologies, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and to all
references to our Firm, included in or made part of this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos.
333-148222 and 333-148223).
 
 
 /s/ HJ
& Associates, LLC.
 
 HJ &
Associates, LLC
 Salt Lake
City, Utah
 March 30,
2010
Order entered July 2 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-13-00105-CR DARRYL JACKSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB11-35023-F



### ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On May 13, 2013, we ordered the trial cour t to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record has not been filed. On Ju ne 26, 2013, we received appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal, signed by appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Therefore, we conclude findings are no longer necessary and we VACATE the May 13, 2013 order requiring findings. We are issuing the opinion di smissing the appeal contemporaneously wit this

order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Charles Lee BRUMFIELD, Appellant, v. Ernestine BRUMFIELD, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 16, 1973.

C. B. Creech, Creech, Hogg & Johnson, Ashland, for appellant.

Calvin R. Gearhart, Catlettsburg, for ap-pellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice STEINFELD,

Affirming.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of JacobsEntertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Quarterly Report”), I, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                     theAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                     theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Jeffrey P. Jacobs |
|   | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:                 | March 27, 2007 |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Malmstrom tests Minuteman III missile with launch from VandenbergPublished May 3, 2017
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Command
                **Air Force Global Strike Command  --**
                A team of Air Force Global Strike Command Airmen from the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, launched an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile equipped with a single test reentry vehicle May 3, 2017, at 12:02 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time from Vandenberg AFB, California.
The ICBM's reentry vehicle, which contained a telemetry package used for operational testing, traveled approximately 4,200 miles to the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. These test launches verify the accuracy and reliability of the ICBM weapon system, providing valuable data to ensure a continued safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent.
“The men and women from the 341st Missile Wing Task Force, the Airmen from my squadron, and our host unit here at Vandenberg (AFB) worked tirelessly to pull this launch off — it was awesome to see everyone’s hard work pay off!” said Col. Craig Ramsey, the 576th Flight Test Squadron commander. “It’s efforts like these that make nuclear deterrence effective.”
Malmstrom AFB is one of three missile bases with crew members standing alert 24 hours a day, year-round, overseeing the nation’s ICBM alert forces.
“I am exceedingly proud of the maintainers and operators from the 341st Missile Wing, including those that supported this mission from the onset. This Task Force worked flawlessly alongside the absolute professionals from the 576 FLTS to make this mission a success,” Lt. Col. Tony Rhoades, the GT222 Task Force commander, said. “Promoting the deterrence, assurance and strike capability of the Minuteman III, along with the insight it provides to force readiness, could not be done without the dedication, professionalism and teamwork of the men and women throughout the 341st Missile Wing."
The ICBM community, including the Defense Department, the Department of Energy, and U.S. Strategic Command uses data collected from test launches for continuing force development evaluation. The ICBM test launch program demonstrates the operational capability of the Minuteman III and ensures the United States’ ability to maintain a strong, credible nuclear deterrent as a key element of national security and the security of U.S. allies and partners.Air Force Global Strike Command 



Vandenberg AFB 



ICBM 



Malmstrom AFB 



Minuteman III 



test 



intercontinental ballistic missile 



341st Missile Wing 



AFGSC