alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Matthew W. Shankle, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advance Display
Technologies, Inc.;

   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and I have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
      is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
      business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
      or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

   5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 19, 2004


/s/ MATTHEW W. SHANKLE
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 26, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 26, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0174. LORIE BENTLEY v. JAKE EDGEWORTH et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2017000555
Exhibit 21.1
 VCG Holding Corp.
List of Subsidiaries
December 31, 2009
 State ofName
    
DBA
    
OrganizationVCG Phoenix Corp. (inactive)
    
    
    
    ArizonaVCG-IS, LLC
    
    Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club
    
    CaliforniaBradshaw Hotel, Inc.
    
    
    
    ColoradoDenver Restaurant Concepts LP
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    ColoradoGlenarm Restaurant LLC
    
    Diamond Cabaret®
    
    ColoradoGlendale Restaurant Concepts LP
    
    The Penthouse® Club
    
    ColoradoInternational Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
    
    IEC
    
    ColoradoStout Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
    
    La Boheme Gentlemens Club
    
    ColoradoVCG CO Springs, Inc.
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    ColoradoVCG Licensing, Inc. (inactive)
    
    
    
    ColoradoVCGH Properties, Inc.
    
    
    
    ColoradoVCG Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
    
    VCG Real Estate
    
    ColoradoVCG Restaurants Denver, Inc.
    
    PTs® All Nude
    
    ColoradoKenja II, Inc.
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    FloridaKenja Venture, Inc.
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    FloridaCardinal Management LP
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    IllinoisIRC LP
    
    The Penthouse® Club
    
    IllinoisMRC LP
    
    PTs® Sports Cabaret
    
    IllinoisPlatinum of Illinois, Incorporated
    
    PTs® Brooklyn
    
    IllinoisRCC LP
    
    Roxys
    
    IllinoisIndy Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    IndianaKentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    KentuckyKenkev II, Inc.
    
    PTs® Showclub
    
    Maine4th Street Partnership LP
    
    
    
    MinnesotaClassic Affairs, Inc.
    
    Schieks Palace Royal
    
    MinnesotaGood Cheer, Inc.
    
    
    
    North CarolinaRaleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
    
    The Mens Club®
    
    North CarolinaVCG-FL, LLC (in process of being dissolved)
    
    
    
    Rhode IslandKenkev, Inc.
    
    
    
    South CarolinaGolden Productions JGC Fort Worth, LLC
    
    Jaguars Gold Club
    
    TexasManana Entertainment, Inc.
    
    Jaguars Gold Club
    
    Texas
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000769131
<NAME>                        Rancon Realty Fund V
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,331
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    6,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,433
<PP&E>                                         35,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          458
<BONDS>                                        13,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,058
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,414
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (6.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (6.67)
        


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

728 

CAF 13-00019 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ZACHARY R. 

------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

DUANE R., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

EVELYNE A. O’SULLIVAN, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL). 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret

O. Szczur, J.) entered December 19, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things,

terminated the parental rights of respondent. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order terminating

his parental rights with respect to his son on the ground of mental

illness. We conclude that petitioner met its burden of demonstrating

by clear and convincing evidence that the father is “presently and for

the foreseeable future unable, by reason of mental illness . . . , to

provide proper and adequate care for [the] child” (Social Services Law

§ 384-b [4] [c]; see Matter of Christopher B., Jr. [Christopher B.,

Sr.], 104 AD3d 1188, 1188; Matter of Alberto C. [Tibet H.], 96 AD3d

1487, 1488, lv denied 19 NY3d 813). Contrary to the father’s

contention, petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence

establishing that he is presently suffering from a mental illness that

“is manifested by a disorder or disturbance in behavior, feeling,

thinking or judgment to such an extent that if such child were placed

in . . . the custody of the [father], the child would be in danger of

becoming a neglected child” (§ 384-b [6] [a]; see Matter of Destiny V.

[Lynette V.], 106 AD3d 1495, 1495). 

The father’s contention that petitioner undermined his

relationship with the child by limiting his visitation time and thus

failed to establish that it made diligent efforts to strengthen and

encourage his relationship with his child is of no moment. “[U]nlike

[a] case where parental rights are terminated due to permanent neglect
-2- 728 

CAF 13-00019 

. . . , no such showing is required when the ground for termination is

mental illness” (Matter of Demetrius F., 176 AD2d 940, 941; see Matter

of Michael D., 306 AD2d 938, 938; see generally Matter of Michael F.,

16 AD3d 1116, 1116).

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated August 3, 2000 relating to the
financial statements, which appears in the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated by reference in AmeriCredit Corp.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated August 3, 2000 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to
the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


Fort Worth, Texas
January 29, 2001
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TYRONE THOMAS.

September 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

s0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148232

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148232

COA: 318691

Wayne CC: 87

- 006776

- FC;

87

- 006777

- FC

RICKY TYRONE CROWDER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Giga-tronics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending March 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, George H. Bruns, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ GEORGE H. BRUNS, JRGeorge H. Bruns, Jr.Chief Executive Officer6/13/05Date
 50
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1051

In re: MICHAEL GRAYLEN WHEELER , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:04

- cr - 00066

- RLV

- CH

- 1 )

Submitted : May 31, 2018 Decided: June 21, 2018

Before MOTZ and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Graylen Wheeler, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Graylen Wheeler petitions for a w rit of mandamus, alleging the district court has not adjudicated his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion that he filed on June 11, 2012. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The pro se motion requested a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750. However, the district court had already denied his counseled § 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 750, and we affirmed the district court’s order denying the motion. Moreover, Wheeler is no longer serving the prison sentence that was based on a Sentencing Guidelines range that was subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission. Instead, he is now serving a revocation sentence based on his violation of supervised release conditions. “[M]andamus has traditionally been used in the federal courts only to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.” Will v. United States , 389 U.S . 90, 95 (1967) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3 d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). The party seeking issuance of the writ bears the burden of showing that his right to the writ is clear and indisputable. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d at 517 (citations omitted). We conclude that Wheeler fails to make this showing. According ly, although we grant him leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense3 with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Meyer, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nayna Networks,
Inc., (the "Company");

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting; and

(5) The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2005           By: /s/ Michael Meyer
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                        Michael Meyer,
                                        Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

s0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

147471

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147471

COA: 296256

Oakland CC: 2009-224545-FC

THOMAS JAY McCLOUD, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

cases of People v Eliason (Docket No. 147428) and People v Davis (Docket No. 146819) 

are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve 

an issue present in this case, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decisions in those cases.
<PAGE>

EX 11.1

  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE


                        IMAGINON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three months ended March 31,
                                                  2001          2000
                                               -----------   -----------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>
Net loss                                       $(1,486,613)  $(2,029,341)

Series F preferred stock dividend                  (37,522)      (36,667)
Series F preferred stock redemption premium        (37,500)     (200,000)
Amortization of discount on preferred stock
Series G preferred stock dividend
                                               -----------   -----------
Net loss applicable to common shareholders     $(1,561,635)  $(2,266,008)
                                               ===========   ===========

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                            56,415,860    44,543,439

Common equivalent shares representing
  shares issuable upon exercise of
  outstanding options and warrants and
  conversion of preferred stock                        -*-           -*-
                                               -----------   -----------

Basic and diluted loss per common share              $(.03)  $     (0.05)
                                               ===========   ===========
</TABLE>

* No impact to weighted average number of shares as the inclusion of additional
shares assuming the exercise of outstanding options and warrants and conversion
of preferred stock would have been antidilutive.

Diluted and supplementary net loss per share are not presented as the amounts
are not dilutively or incrementally different from basic net loss per share
amounts.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.6

                          CONSENT OF RESERVE ENGINEER

The Board of Directors of
Pure Resources, Inc.

     I hereby consent to the use of my name in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus
included in this Registration Statement on Form S-4, including under the heading
"Experts" in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

     /s/ Gary Dupriest
----------------------------
Gary Dupriest
Vice President - Pure Resources, Inc.


April 17, 2000