alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 57 1 . COURTNEY J AMAL CLI N TON v . THE STATE.

Fo l l owi n g a ben ch t ri al

, t h e co u rt en t ered a v e r d i c t f in d i ng Co u rt n ey J am al

Cl i n t o n g u i l t y o f h ab i t u al l y i m p ai red d ri v i n g an d t h ree o t h er o ffen s es t o wh i ch

Cl i n t o n s t i p u l at ed g u i l t

. H o w ev er, t h e t ri al co u rt ex p res s l y wi th hel d sen t en ci n g u n t i l

a l at er t i m e. Cl i n to n t h en fi l ed t h i s di r e c t ap p eal

. W e l ack ju ri s di ct i o n b ecau s e t h e

ch al l en g ed o rd er i s i nt erl o cu t o ry

.

Al t h ou g h t h e t ri al co u rt fo u n d Cl i n t o n gu i l t y

, i t h as n o t en t ered a ju d g m en t o f

co n vi ct i o n an d h as n o t i m p o s ed a s en t en ce. Acco rd i n gl y

, t he cas e rem ai n s p en d i n g

b el o w, an d Cl in t o n was req u i red t o fo l l o w t he i n t erl o cu t ory ap p eal p r o c e d u r es o f

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ) t o o b t ai n ap p el l at e rev i ew at t h i s t i m e. See Kel l er v. S ta t e

, 2 7 5

Ga. 6 80 (5 7 1 SE2 d 8 0 6) (2 0 0 2 ) (a cri m i n al cas e rem ai n s p e n d i n g un t i l t h e co u rt

en t ers a wri t t en ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct i o n an d s en t en ce); Cr o ll ey v. S t a t e

, 1 82 Ga. Ap p.

2 (1 ) (3 5 4 SE2 d 8 6 4 ) (1 9 8 7 ) (a cri m i n al p ro ceed i n g is p en d in g u n t i l t h e co u rt en t ers

a wri t t en s en t en ce). Cl i n t on ’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t he req u i s it e p ro ced u res d ep ri v es u s

o f ju ri s d ict i o n t o co n s i d er h i s ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/23/2015 December 23, 2015
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CAE Inc. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report).

I, Alain Raquepas, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(i)  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|    

|/s/ Alain Raquepas                                 
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|Alain Raquepas                                     
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 29, 2007

---
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, AT EL PASO

No. 08-13-00156-CV

Sanders Oil & Gas, Ltd.

v.

Big Lake Kay Construction, Inc.

(No. 1555 IN 112TH DISTRICT COURT OF REAGAN COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$1,250.00

$61.00

$10.00

$10.00

$175.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

TAMMY COLE

STEVEN L. WOOLARD

STEVEN L. WOOLARD

JOHNSON LAW FIRM

SANDERS OIL & GAS, LTD.

BROOME LAW OFFICE

STANLEY BROOME

BROOME LAW FIRM

BROOME LAW FIRM

Balance of costs owing to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DENISE PACHECO, CLERK OF THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and

correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and

styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Eighth District of Texas, this May 24, 2018.

Denise Pacheco, Clerk

FILE COPY
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10007 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. BALDEMAR GONZALEZ

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-130-2

-------------------- November 13, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Proceeding pro se , Baldemar Gonzalez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Gonzalez has filed a motion to supplement the record and a motion for leave to file an out-of-time reply to the Government’s opposition to his motion to supplement the record. These motions are DENIED. Gonzalez has also filed a motion to extend the time for filing a reply briefand a motion to have the reply brief considered timely filed due

to mitigating circumstances. These motions are GRANTED. Gonzalez argues that the district court erred in attributing 3.5 kilograms of cocaine to him because the negotiated sale of that amount was never consummated. The district court did not clearly err in finding that the negotiated, but unconsummated, sale of 3.5 kilograms of cocaine by Gonzalez to an undercover officer was a separate transaction from the transaction which led to Gonzalez’s arrest. See United States v. Morris , 46 F.3d 410, 422 (5th Cir. 1995). Moreover, a de novo review of the record reveals no error in the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines to the facts of Gonzalez’s case. See United States v. Cothran , 302 F.3d 279, 286 (5th Cir. 2002). Gonzalez also asserts, for the first time on appeal, that the Government breached the plea agreement in his case by advocating that he be held accountable for a drug quantity higher than that stipulated to in the factual resume which formed the basis for the guilty plea. Gonzalez has not shown that his interpretation of the plea agreement was reasonable; thus he has not shown plain error with respect to this claim. See United
States v. Reeves , 255 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 2001). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 12, 2010
    
    / s / Troy LowrieTroy LowrieChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit31.2

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Income RealEstate, L.P.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
**EXHIBIT 31.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





I, David J. Benedetti, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Invisa, Inc. (Invisa);





2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Invisa as of and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.  Invisas other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Invisa and have:





a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Invisa, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of Invisas disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and





c.  Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.  Invisas other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Invisas auditors and the audit committee of Invisas board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Invisas ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Invisas auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Invisas internal controls; and





6.  Invisas other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




****Date: February 4, 2005

/s/*David J. Benedetti*Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN GAIN.

May 14, 1985.

Certification is granted solely as to defendant’s sentence; and it is further

ORDERED that the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County, for a resentencing of defendant, and an articulation of the reasons therefor, in the light of the requirements of *State v. Roth,*95 *N.J.*334 (1984), and *State v. Hodge,*95 *N.J.*369, 374 (1984). *See also State v. Morgan,*196 *N.J.Super.*1, 4 (App.Div.1984).

Jurisdiction is not retained.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2404 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2404

  To make permanent the extended period of protections for members of 
  uniformed services relating to mortgages, mortgage foreclosure, and 
                   eviction, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2014

Mr. Whitehouse introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make permanent the extended period of protections for members of 
  uniformed services relating to mortgages, mortgage foreclosure, and 
                   eviction, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreclosure Relief and Extension for 
Servicemembers Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT EXTENDED PERIOD OF PROTECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              UNIFORMED SERVICES RELATING TO MORTGAGES, MORTGAGE 
              FORECLOSURE, AND EVICTION.

    Section 710(d) of the Honoring America's Veterans and Caring for 
Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-154; 126 Stat. 1208) 
is amended by striking paragraphs (1) and (3).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1** **Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer****Exhibit 32.1****Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer.**In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Kensington Bankshares, Inc. for the periodending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gerald K. Archibald, President and Chief Executive Officer of KensingtonBankshares, Inc., (the “Company”), certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The annual report of the Company as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.       /s/ Gerald K. Archibald Gerald K. Archibald    President and Chief Executive Officer    July 7, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53376-53377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

August 25, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be

[[Page 53377]]

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before September 30, 
2010 to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0005.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Letterhead applications and notices filed by brewers TTB REC 
5130/2.
    Form: TTB F 5130.10.
    Abstract: The Internal Revenue Code requires brewers to file a 
notice of intent to operate a brewery. TTB F 5130.10 is similar to a 
permit and, when approved by TTB, is a brewer's authorization to 
operate. Letterhead applications and notices are necessary to identify 
brewery activities so that TTB may ensure that proposed operations do 
not jeopardize Federal revenues.
    Respondents: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 10,593 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Gerald Isenberg, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 
Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005; 
(202) 453-2097
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Celina M. Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-21669 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
Atossa Genetics Inc.


 


November 12, 2012


 


Christopher S. Destro


 


Re: Employment Offer


 


Dear Chris:


 


I would like to formally extend to you an offer of employment
as Vice President of Sales and Marketing with Atossa Genetics. Atossa Genetics has an exciting future and we believe that you will
bring great value to our organization.


 


Below are the key terms of our offer of employment to you:


 


Responsibilities: As the Vice President of Sales & Marketing,
you will be responsible for, but not limited to establishing a marketing and sales plan, in conjunction with the CEO and for the
launch of Atossa’s products and for the implementation of the plan, including but not limited to hiring, coaching, developing
and managing the sales departments and our independent sales reps.


 


Reporting: You will report directly to Dr. Steven Quay until
further notice.


 


Start Date: Your employment shall commence December 10, 2012.


 


Salary: Your initial base salary shall be $180,000 paid bi-weekly.
Your status will be a regular, full-time, exempt employee.


 


Bonus: You will receive a bonus of up to 35% of base salary
based on goals and objectives mutually set following hiring.


 


Other costs: You will be reimbursed for all office and business
related expenses to perform your function.


 


Benefits: Atossa Genetics will provide Medical, Dental and Optical
Insurance Benefits per company policy.


 


Vacation and Holidays: During your employment with Atossa Genetics,
you are entitled to 15 days of PTO accrued at 1.25 days per month. Furthermore, you will receive 8 paid company holidays.


 


Stock Options: You will receive a grant of options to 200,000
shares of Atossa common stock with a strike price set at the fair market value on your date of employment. These vest over four
years, with 25% after one year and then the remainder vesting as 1/12th per quarter until they are fully vested. If
there is a change in control of the company all shares will be vested.


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


By signing this offer of employment, you agree to abide by the
rules, regulations, ethics and policies of Atossa. This offer of employment is contingent upon successful completion of our reference
checking process, which includes a post-offer drug test and background screening.


 


For purposes of federal immigration law, you will be required
to provide to Atossa Genetics documentary evidence of your identity and eligibility for employment in the United States. Such documentation
must be provided to Atossa Genetics within three (3) business days of your date of hire.


 


I look forward to you joining Atossa and being an integral part
of helping us build a company that will change the paradigm of breast cancer for women.


 


Regards,


 


/s/ Steven Quay


 


Steven Quay, MD, PhD, FCAP


CEO & President, Atossa Genetics, Inc.


 


Accepted.


 


	/s/ Christopher S. Destro
	 
	Christopher Destro


 


Addendum:


2014 Salary: $205,000