alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of the
Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (collectively, the
"Report"), the undersigned certifies, based on his knowledge that, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    April 15, 2004               By:   /s/ Donald A. Pitcher
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Donald A. Pitcher
                                            EVP /Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Courtney CowgillCourtney CowgillChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer ofSerologicals Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2005(the “Report”) as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and ExchangeCommission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 10, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Harold W. Ingalls                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Harold W. Ingalls                                    |
|   | Vice President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 3, 2016.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00853

- CV

IN RE GUS MENDIZABAL , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15CV0919



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 25, 2016, relator Gus Mendizabal filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable
John D. Kinard
, Galveston County District Clerk, to receive and file all papers in the underlying case, inform relator of all proceedings in the cas e , and notify the
district court that a trial date should be set.2

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the
Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) wri ts against a district court judge or a county court judge in the court of appeals’ district; and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. The district clerk is not a district court or county co urt judge in this court’s district, and relator has not shown that the issuance of a writ compelling the requested relief is necessary to enforce this court’s appellate jurisdiction. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus again st the district clerk.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARC WEBB.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |        June 16, 2008    |   | By:    |        /s/ Brian D. Pflug                                                                                                    |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                        |   |   | Brian      D. PflugSenior      Vice President – Accounting & Finance(Principal      Financial & Accounting Officer) |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40281

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO VENTURA, also known as Moises Ventura,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:09-CR-2192-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ventura has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Ventura has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40281 Document: 00512473191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40281

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40281 Document: 00512473191 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
II 

Calendar No. 106 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 211 

[Report No. 113–52] 

To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project Transfer 

Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Reported by Mr. WYDEN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River 

Project Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain 

property descriptions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 211 RS

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIP2 TIONS IN PROVO RIVER PROJECT TRANSFER 

3 ACT. 

4 (a) PLEASANT GROVE PROPERTY.—Section 2(4)(A) 

5 of the Provo River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108– 

6 382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended by striking ‘‘of enact7 ment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on which the parcel is 

8 conveyed under section 3(a)(2)’’. 

9 (b) PROVO RESERVOIR CANAL.—Section 2(5) of the 

10 Provo River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108–382; 

11 118 Stat. 2212) is amended— 

12 (1) by striking ‘‘canal, and any associated land, 

13 rights-of-way, and facilities’’ and inserting ‘‘water 

14 conveyance facility historically known as the Provo 

15 Reservoir Canal and all associated bridges, fixtures, 

16 structures, facilities, lands, interests in land, and 

17 rights-of-way held,’’; 

18 (2) by inserting ‘‘and forebay’’ after ‘‘Diversion 

19 Dam’’; 

20 (3) by inserting ‘‘near the Jordan Narrows to 

21 the point where water is discharged to the Welby22 Jacob Canal and the Utah Lake Distributing Canal’’ 

23 after ‘‘Penstock’’; and 

24 (4) by striking ‘‘of enactment of this Act’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is 

26 conveyed under section 3(a)(1)’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 106 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 211 

[Report No. 113–52] 

A BILL 

To amend certain definitions contained in the 

other purposes. clarifying certain property descriptions, and for Provo River Project Transfer Act for purposes of 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Reported without amendment 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. GILLEY

No. 228P01

Case below: 135 N.C. App. 519

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 June 2001.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul A. Schmidt, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 17, 2008



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/    Paul A. Schmidt        
|Paul A. Schmidt               
|Acting Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: August 23, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10278
Butte Community Bank
Chico
CA
8/20/2010.10279
Community National Bank at Bartow
Bartow
FL
8/20/2010.10280
Imperial Savings and Loan Association
Martinsville
VA
8/20/2010.10281
Independent National Bank
Ocala
FL
8/20/2010.10282
Los Padres Bank
Solvang
CA
8/20/2010.10283
Pacific State Bank
Stockton
CA
8/20/2010.10284
ShoreBank
Chicago
IL
8/20/2010.10285
Sonoma Valley Bank
Sonoma
CA
8/20/2010.


[FR Doc. 2010-21810 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000768216
<NAME>                        National Air Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,487
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       738
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        



</TABLE>
30.00
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a
pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    137.50
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a
pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    1,000,00050.00
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a
pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    2,000,00062.50
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a
pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    3,000,00075.00
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a
pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    4,000,000
    Sincerely,/s/ Peter Edison


Peter Edison
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53957-53958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21880]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 16 September 2010, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by e-mailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dfef9ecebebcdeeebeca3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b484f5a5d5d7b585d5a155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.


[[Page 53958]]


    Dated 26 August 2010 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21880 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.4





CERTIFICATION



I, Edmund C. King, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment
    No. 1  to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Invisa, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:   April 30, 2015 |  | /s/  Edmund C. King    
|                       |  | Edmund C. King         
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 176 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 176

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used 
              predominantly within an Indian reservation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used 
              predominantly within an Indian reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INDIAN EMPLOYMENT CREDIT AND 
              DEPRECIATION RULES FOR PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

    (a) Employment Credit.--
            (1) In general.--Section 45A of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 (relating to Indian employment credit) is amended by 
        striking subsection (f).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by this subsection 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007.
    (b) Depreciation Rules.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (j) of section 168 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to property on Indian 
        reservations) is amended by striking paragraph (8).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by this subsection 
        shall apply to property placed in service after December 31, 
        2007.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

QSI FY 2015 Director Compensation Plan 
  

																					
	 	  	Tier 0	 	  	Tier 1	 	  	Tier 2	 	  	Tier 3	 	  	Tier 4	 
	 	  	Employee
Director	 	  	Non-Employee
Director	 	  	Nominating &
Governance and
Compensation
Committee
Chairpersons	 	  	Audit
Committee
Chairperson	 	  	Board
Chairperson	 
	 Annual Base Compensation
	  	$	0	  	  	$	80,000	  	  	$	100,000	  	  	$	110,000	  	  	$	120,000	  
	 Value of Restricted Stock
	  	$	0	  	  	$	80,000	  	  	$	100,000	  	  	$	110,000	  	  	$	120,000	  

 2015 Director Compensation Plan Terms: 
  

	1.	Meeting attendance is expected to be at or near a 100% level. 

  

	2.	Pay Tiers: Tier 0 is for directors who are full-time employees of the Company. Tier 1 is for non-employee directors who do not chair a committee. Tier 2 is for Nominating and Governance Committee and Compensation
Committee Chairpersons. Tier 3 is for Audit Committee Chairperson. Tier 4 is for Board Chairperson. A Chairperson of any other committee will be paid at the highest tier otherwise eligible, according to the specifically named functions above. All
directors are only paid at one tier (and not multiple tiers if chairing more than one committee), which is their highest eligible tier. 

  

	3.	Each director is to be awarded restricted shares of the Company’s common stock (“Restricted Stock”) upon the date of his/her election or re-election to the Board equivalent to the value amounts set
forth in the table above. The shares of Restricted Stock will be valued at the price of the Company’s common stock at the close of trading on the date of grant. The Restricted Stock will be issued according to the standard form of the
Company’s approved Amended and Restated Stock Agreement and pursuant to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and will carry a restriction requiring that the Restricted Stock vest in two equal
installments over two consecutive years with the vesting dates being the next two meeting dates of the Company’s annual shareholders’ meeting following the director’s election or re-election to the Board. In the event of an annual
shareholders’ meeting immediately following which a director that previously received Restricted Stock under the 2015 Director Compensation Plan is no longer a member of the Board, then any unvested shares of Restricted Stock held by such
director shall immediately vest and become transferable on the date of such annual shareholders meeting. The Restricted Stock shall be granted on a pro-rata basis for directors appointed to serve less than a full year. 


 

	4.	All directors must own a minimum of 2,000 shares of the Company’s common stock purchased on the open market, which must be retained as long as they are a director. New directors have nine months in which to fulfill
their minimum common stock holding requirements after their election or appointment to the Board. 

  

	5.	Base compensation shall be paid quarterly.