alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-41366 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAMIRO BASALDUA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-856-3

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ramiro Basaldua pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy t o possess five kilograms or more of cocaine with intent to distribute. After determining that Basaldua was subject to the c areer o ffender provisions o f § 4 B1.1 of the United States S entencing Guidelines, the district court sentenced him to 292 m onths in prison, at t h e b o t t o m of the advisory guidelines r ange. B asaldua appeals, arguing that neither h is current c onviction nor his p r ior federal drug conspiracy conviction constitutes a controlled s ubstance offense for purposes of § 4B1.1. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 10, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-41366 Document: 00512268070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2013No. 12-41366

Specifically, Basaldua contends that b ecause a fede r al conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 846 does n ot require proof of a n overt act, it does not meet the generic definition of conspiracy. However, he asserts that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno , 7 00 F.3d 75 1 , 7 5 4 (5th C ir. 2 012), cert. denied, 2013 WL 1313840 (Apr. 29, 2013), and he has filed an u nopposed motion seeking summary disposition. A s B a s a ldua concedes, w e r e j e c t e d m a t e r i a l l y i n d i s t i n gu i s h ab l e a r gu m e n t s in Rodriguez-Escareno , 700 F .3d at 753-54. A l t h o u gh that case involved the definition of a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1. 2 o f the Guidelines, we discern no reason t h a t its analysis should not apply to the nearly i dentical definition of a control l e d substance offense for purposes of § 4 B1.1. See, e.g., United States v . Henao-Melo , 591 F.3d 798, 803 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2009) (comparing the two defini t ions and n oting t hat, given their similarities, this court cites decisions interpreting them interchangeably). In light of the foregoing, Basaldua’s motio n f o r summary disposition is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-41366 Document: 00512268070 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information from Trump's Castle
Associates, L.P.  This data has been extracted from the Consolidated Balance
Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911534
<NAME> TRUMP'S CASTLE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          33,663        33,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,910<F1>    15,910<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0             0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,183         3,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,698        55,698
<PP&E>                                         542,762       542,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,374        67,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545,428       545,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,311        62,311
<BONDS>                                        400,584       400,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0             0
<PREFERRED>                                          0             0
<COMMON>                                             0             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545,428       545,428
<SALES>                                              0             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,097       227,980
<CGS>                                                0             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,702       186,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,372<F2>    13,034<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,267        42,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0             0
<CHANGES>                                            0             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,033       (13,243)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0             0
<FN>
<F1>Asset values represent net amounts.
<F2>Represents depreciation and amortization expenses.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6971

JIMMY ALLRED, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHIEF OF SECURITY (STG); ROBERT SMITH; CHARLES RAYNOR, Captain, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-285-5-BR) Submitted: August 14, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Lee Allred, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Lee Allred appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allred v. Chief of Security , No. CA-01-285-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  Matthew W.
      ShankleMatthew
      W. ShanklePresident,
      Chief Executive and Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer and Prinipal Financial
  Officer)





February
16, 2010
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods
included  in the year  covered  by this  annual  report,  of  WASHINGTON  MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-MS3;

     2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information  in these  reports,  taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  servicer  under the pooling and
servicing, or similar,  agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicer
under the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement  and based  upon my
knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and
except as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its  obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The  reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating  to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting  a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:

First Chicago NBD Mortgage,  First Nationwide Mortgage Corp, Flagstar Bank, FSB,
Greenpoint  Mortgage  Company,   Guaranty  Residential  Lending,  National  City
Mortgage, Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 021 4 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSHUA GLEN REID,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court Reporter Cindy Prindiville is granted an extension of time to and including September 22, 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2021

08/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0214
#### Ellouise WADDELL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 17, 1974.

John Chris Cornett, Cordell H. Martin, Hindman, for appellant.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Thomas R. Emerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Affirming.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

EMMETT M. LOCKHART, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 8 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John M. Carradine, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company and Ronald K. Herbert, Chief FinancialOfficer, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By: /s/ John M. Carradine  |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
| John  M. Carradine         |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer   |   |
| August 8,  2008       |   |
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
| By:  /s/ Ronald K. Herbert |   |
|                       |   |
| Ronald  K. Herbert         |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer   |   |
| August 8,  2008       |   |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Mobility Airmen support Peru relief missionPublished April 5, 2017
                        
                        
                        U.S. Southern Command Public Affairs
                **LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, Ark. (AFNS) --**
                At the request of the government of Peru, two U.S. Air Force C-130 Hercules aircraft from Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, flew to Lima, Peru, April 4, 2017, to support ongoing U.S. disaster assistance to communities devastated by floods resulting from torrential rainfall in the country’s northern region.
The aircraft will support the transport of aid and personnel to areas impacted by the floods and will join the ongoing U.S. relief mission led by the U.S. Agency for International Development to help alleviate human suffering there.
The Defense Department has also donated $270,000 for the purchase of water purification systems, portable solar generators and water pumps distributed to affected areas.
As part of its partnership with Peru, U.S. Southern Command previously provided disaster preparedness assistance to the South American nation, including the construction of 13 regional emergency operation centers used by Peruvian relief personnel supporting victims of the recent floods.C-130 



AMC 



Peru 



Hercules 



Little Rock AFB 



SOUTHCOM 



USAID 



floods 



disaster relief
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000769592
<NAME>                        Tecon, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,165
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,200
<OTHER-SE>                                    (5,365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (2,023)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,023)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)
        



</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 10, 2011*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.123 Closed-End and Exchange-Traded Funds** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
News United States Air Force
 Airmen perform bodywork, ensure capable aircraftPublished Jan. 18, 2017
                        
                        By Senior Airman Emily Kenney
                        
                        
                        49th Wing Public Affairs
                **HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS)  --**
                Sandpaper scrapes along the wing of an MQ-9 Reaper, as debris drifts to the ground and the smell of chemical agents saturate the air. Squeals from an F-16 Fighting Falcon engine fill the temperature-controlled back shop. The Airmen are focused; there’s a job to be done, and it has to be done right.This is a normal day in the 49th Maintenance Squadron’s sheet metal shop.“Aircraft structural maintenance is basically performing bodywork on aircraft,” said Senior Airman Devon Guillory, a 49th Maintenance Squadron aircraft structural maintenance technician. “We re-manufacture parts that are no longer available for the Air Force to buy. We do a lot of back shop repairs and flightline jobs with both the F-16s and the MQ-9s.”  These Airmen are responsible for keeping MQ-9s and F-16s structurally sound and mission ready. This requires technicians to think on their feet and be prepared for any odd-job that comes their way.“My favorite part of my job is being able to work on different aircraft,” Guillory said. “We aren’t specific to one aircraft. We can work on anything from heavies, to fighters, to bombers. The most challenging part is thinking about what specific repairs need to be done. The [technical order] doesn’t specify exactly what needs to be done, so you have to think for yourself and come up with an idea to make that repair work.” Jobs vary greatly, ranging from structural to cosmetic repairs.“A regular day usually consists of stuck screws and standoffs on the flightline,” said Airman 1st Class Joshua Guthrie, a 49th MXS aircraft structural maintenance technician. “Back shop jobs usually consist of regular structural repairs on different types of panels. That’s my favorite part of the job -- the different repairs we get to do. On a daily basis you never know what you’re going to get -- a scarf repair on the MQ-9, or a doubler and filler on an F-16.”Most recently, the Airmen have been working on an MQ-1 Predator static aircraft.“The MQ-1 is retiring in a couple months, and the 49th Wing is putting a static display in Heritage Park,” said Guthrie. “We are doing a lot of work to make sure it looks good and is ready for display.”The technicians in the sheet metal shop also work within the fabrication flight to ensure aircraft are capable to accomplish the mission.“If there are any cracks, anywhere, non-destructive inspection will discover it, then we go out and make a repair for it,” Guthrie said. “Metals tech then makes different parts if we can’t order them. We all work together to make sure we can keep the birds in the air.”f-16 



MQ-9 



ACC 



repair 



MQ-1 



Heritage Park 



49th MXS 



Holloman AFB
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


Pursuant
      To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report Nayna Networks, Inc. (formerly ResCon
      Technology Corp.), on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended September 30, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned, William Wong, Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, herby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*Date:
                December 22, 2006*
            *By:*
            */S/
                William Wong**William
                Wong,*
              *Principal
                Financial Officer*
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22137]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Committee of Chairs of the Industry 
Trade Advisory Committees (ITACs)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Opened Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee of Chairs of the Industry Trade Advisory 
Committees (ITACs) will hold a meeting on Friday, September 17, 2010, 
from 10 a.m. to 12 noon. The meeting will be closed to the public from 
10 a.m. to 10:45 a.m. and opened to the public from 11 a.m. to 12 noon.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for September 17, 2010, unless 
otherwise notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Room 4830, located at 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ingrid Mitchem, DFO (202) 482-3268, 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agenda topics to be discussed are:

--National Export Initiative (NEI).
--Report of the Chairs on ITACs' Trade Priority Issues and Concerns.

Isaac Faz,
Acting Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Intergovernmental 
Affairs and Public Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2010-22137 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W0-P