alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo– Sabesp (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Jerson Kelman, Chief Executive Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theU.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  

      (i)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii)           the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April26,****2018

By:         /s/JersonKelman         

Name:    JersonKelman

Title:     Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2369 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2369

   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
   consider Brunswick County, North Carolina to be part of the same 
      metropolitan statistical area as Wilmington, North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2014

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
   consider Brunswick County, North Carolina to be part of the same 
      metropolitan statistical area as Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRUNSWICK COUNTY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
the purpose of the delineation of metropolitan statistical areas, the 
Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall consider 
Brunswick County, North Carolina to be part of the same metropolitan 
statistical area that contains Wilmington, North Carolina.
    (b) Sunset.--Subsection (a) shall cease to be effective on January 
1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Larry Pollock, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cole NationalCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: September 7, 2004 /s/ Larry Pollock
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, D.C.

*Docket Number: 10-038*. Applicant: Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR 46912, August 4, 2010.                 

*Docket Number: 10-049*. Applicant: Health Research Inc., New York State Department of Health, Menands, NY 12204-2719. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR 46912, August 4, 2010.                 

*Docket Number: 10-051*. Applicant: Regents of the University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0651. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR 46912, August 4, 2010.                

Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

Dated: August 24, 2010.

Gregory W. Campbell,

Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-21557 Filed 8-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
**Exhibit32.2**

CertificationPursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As AdoptedPursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Maris,Vice President – Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1)                                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

2)                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | February 20,  2007                                  |   | /s/ | William R. Maris |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|-----|------------------|--------|
|   | William R. Maris                                    |
|   | Vice President – Finance & Administration, |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                             |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        |

 

----
#### STATE v. ALDRIDGE

No. 469P00

Case below: 139 N.C. App. 706

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 20 December 2000. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.
#### The State, ex rel. Roshon, *v.*Auble et al., Board of Aid for Aged of Medina County.

(No. 25720

Decided March 4, 1936.)

*Mr. L. Ashley Pelton*and *Mr. Harold L. Williams,*for relator.

*Mr. R. E. Snedden,*prosecuting attorney, for respondents.

This cause came on to be heard upon the motion of the relator for judgment on the pleadings, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the petition be dismissed at the costs of the respondents, it appearing from the pleadings and statement of counsel that the relator is entitled to the office, has been appointed to the office since this proceeding was instituted, is now in office, and the respondents are not contesting his incumbency.

*Petition dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F/A of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the Company) on for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Purcell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: July 17, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen Purcell    
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Stephen Purcell        
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-21043

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SULAIMAN MUSTAPHA FARAWE, also known

as Michael Ajibola Farawe,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-01-CR-303-2)

--------------------

November 7, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellee Sulaiman Mustapha Farawe appeals the

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to possess and traffic in 15 or more counterfeit or

unauthorized access devices and aiding and abetting in the

possession of more than 15 counterfeit or unauthorized access

devices. He first argues that the district court erred in basing

its loss calculation on the intended loss from his credit card

fraud rather than the actual loss. We have reviewed the record and
2

conclude that the district court did not plainly err by calculating

Farawe’s sentence on the basis of the intended loss. See United

States v. Saacks, 131 F.3d 540, 542-43 (5th Cir. 1997); United

States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir. 1996). 

We also reject Farawe’s argument that the district court

improperly denied him credit for acceptance of responsibility.

Throughout the rearraignment and sentencing, Farawe attempted to

minimize his participation in the offense of conviction and

attempted to downplay his fraudulent intent. See U.S.S.G. 

§ 3E1.1(a); United States v. Wilder, 15 F.3d 1292, 1299 (5th Cir.

1994). 

Farawe contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to

“protect” his opportunity to receive a two-level adjustment for

acceptance of responsibility and for failing to investigate and

object to the loss and restitution calculations. We decline to

review Sixth Amendment claims of ineffective assistance of counsel

on direct appeal when, as here, the record is not sufficiently

developed to allow us to evaluate fairly the merits of the claims.

See United States v. Gibson, 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995);

United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 4 (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants

1250 René-Lévesque Boulevard West

Suite 2800

Montreal, Quebec

Canada H3B 2G4

Telephone +1 (514) 205 5000

Facsimile +1 (514) 205-5675 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of CAE Inc. for the year ended
March 31, 2005, of our auditors report dated May 10, 2005 on the consolidated balance sheets of
CAE Inc. as at March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated statements of earnings, retained
earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005, and
our related Comments by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference dated May 10,
2005. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-97185) of CAE Inc., relating to common shares to be offered to employees under employee benefit
plans, of our auditors report dated May 10, 2005 relating to the above-mentioned financial
statements and of our related Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting
Differences dated May 10, 2005. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants Montréal, Québec
June 28, 2005 PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and other
members of the worldwide PricewaterhouseCoopers organization.
Filed 5/17/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 96

W.J. Wilson, Jr., Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

Nos. 20110362 & 20110363

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Bobbi Brown Weiler, 418 E. Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant.

Kelly Ann Dillon, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee.

Wilson v. State

Nos. 20110362 & 20110363

Per Curiam.

[¶1]W.J. Wilson, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.  On appeal, Wilson argues he was denied due process of law because the court did not view an allegedly altered videotape at the hearing on his post-conviction relief application.  Wilson also contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to call and question a certain witness.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James Briscoe, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Liberty Star Uranium
      & Metals Corp. for the period ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Liberty Star Uranium & Metals
Corp.                                                                

Dated: May 15, 2009

/s/ James Briscoe James BriscoePresident, Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) and (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberty Star
Uranium & Metals Corp. and will be retained by Liberty Star Uranium &
Metals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 2
to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) by CapSource
Financial, Inc. (Registrant), I, Steven J. Kutcher, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and                  
| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Registrant.

|                         |     |                                                 
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------
|DATE:    August 6 , 2007 | By: | /s/   Steven J. Kutcher                         
|                         |     |                                                 
|                         |     | Name: Steven J. Kutcher                         
|                         |     | Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0273 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT KINGSLEY TAYLOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 20 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2023

02/08/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0273
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00199

- CV

T EXAS H EALTH H ARRIS M ETHODIST

H OSPITAL F ORT W ORTH

, Appellant and Appellee

V

.

S TEPHEN F EATHERLY

, Appellee and Appellant §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Coun ty Court at

Law No. 3

of Tarrant County ( 2016

- 003319

- 3 )

April 14, 2022

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

Dissenting Opinion b y Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed

, and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent

with this opinion

.

It is further ordered that Steven Featherly shall pay all costs of this appeal, for

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell Justice Wade Birdwell
EXHIBIT
13.2






906
Certification




Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549




Ladies and
Gentlemen:




The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) for the
purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.




Max Cheng,
the Chief Financial Officer of AU Optronics Corp., certifies that, to the best
of his knowledge:




1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and




2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of AU Optronics
Corp.




Date: June
3, 2008


By:
            /s/           MAX
      CHENGName:
            Max
      ChengTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer







A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to AU Optronics Corp. and will be
retained by AU Optronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.