alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549




FORM
10-Q/A




(Mark
One)




x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT
OF 1934




For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 OR




 ̈
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934




For the
transition period from _______ to ________




Commission file number
000-51252





NATIONAL
INVESTMENT MANAGERS INC.


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Florida
            59-2091510(State
      or other jurisdiction of
            (I.R.S.Employerincorporation
      or organization)
            identification
      No.)





485 Metro
Place South, Suite 275, Dublin, Ohio 43017


(Address
of principal executive offices)





(614)
923-8822


(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.




Yes
x
No
o




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer or smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):




Large
accelerated filer o
Accelerated
filer o
Non-accelerated
filer o
Smaller
Reporting Company x




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)




Yes
o
No
x




As of
August 11, 2008, 37,158,748 shares of $.001 par value common stock of the
registrant were outstanding.




Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes  o No x














EXPLANATORY NOTE: The sole purpose of this filing is to
amend the first sentence of paragraph 4 of the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer certifications included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2
attached hereto as required pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation
S-K.













SIGNATURES




Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.




NATIONAL
INVESTMENT MANAGERS INC.




Registrant





Dated:
      March 17, 2009
                    /s/
      Steven RossSteven
      RossChief
      Executive Officer and DirectorDated:
      March 17, 2009
                    /s/
      Christopher W. LarkinChristopher
      W. LarkinChief
      Financial
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 2002-B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of June 1, 2002 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by and
between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2002-B, as issuer (the
"Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

      1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June
         1, 2002 until December 31, 2002 was conducted under my supervision.

      2. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
         fully performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the
         Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material
         default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is
         continuing except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

      3. None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2003.


                                                     /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                                     ______________________
                                                     Richard J. Naeder
                                                     Authorized Signatory
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Jose Miranda-Ramos, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Julio Rodriguez, III, J.), rendered July 30, 2014, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the third degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Julio Rodriguez, III, J.), rendered July 30, 2014, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1979]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: March 24, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Health Resource,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Chen, Jiang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:




* the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




* the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




CHINA HEALTH RESOURCE, INC.
                          (Registrant)Date: April
      13, 2009
                        By:
                        /s/ Chen, JiangChen,
      Jiang
                          Chief
      Executive
Officer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136963 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### LARRY GREGORY ALTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136963 COA: 267802 Genesee CC: 03-250096-DO RITA LYNN ALTON, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ ___________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 53264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21746]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

33 CFR Part 334


Restricted Area in Cape Fear River and Tributaries at Sunny Point 
Army Terminal, Brunswick County, NC

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army requested that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
(Corps) revise the regulation for the restricted area in the Cape Fear 
River and its tributaries at Sunny Point Army Terminal, Brunswick 
County, North Carolina, by renaming the marker buoys and specifying the 
latitude and longitude for those buoys. There are no other changes 
proposed for this restricted area regulation. The purpose of the 
proposed rule is to correct the buoys designating the boundary of the 
restricted area which provide security for the facility, and prevent 
acts of terrorism, sabotage, or other criminal acts against the 
facility, including vessels loading and offloading at the Sunny Point 
Army Terminal. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of the Federal 
Register, we are publishing this change to the restricted area 
regulation as a direct final rule without prior proposal because we 
view this as a non-controversial adjustment to our restricted area 
regulations and anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained our 
reasons for this approval in the preamble to the direct final rule. If 
we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action on this 
rule and it will go into effect. If we receive adverse comment, we will 
withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We will 
address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this 
proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this 
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received by September 30, 2010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document concerns the ``Restricted Area 
in Cape Fear River and tributaries at Sunny Point Army Terminal, 
Brunswick County, NC'' rule. For further information, including 
instructions on how to submit comments, please see the information 
provided in the direct final rule that is located in the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register publication.

    Dated: August 13, 2010.
Michael G. Ensch,
Chief, Operations, Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2010-21746 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1900 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1900

    To authorize appropriations for the United States Institute for 
                   Environmental Conflict Resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2007

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize appropriations for the United States Institute for 
                   Environmental Conflict Resolution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 13 of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in 
National Environmental and Native American Public Policy Act of 1992 
(20 U.S.C. 5609) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting 
the following:
    ``(b) Environmental Dispute Resolution Fund.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated to the Environmental Dispute Resolution Fund 
established by section 10, such sums as may be necessary for the 
operating costs of the Institute for each of the fiscal years 2008 
through 2012.''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3576

_____________________________

TAYLOR AMARI MCLEOD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

May 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of HBL, LLC (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Schmitt,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Thomas E. Schmitt

Thomas E. Schmitt
Secretary and Treasurer

April 11, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1632

JAMES KISSEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-01-58-4) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Kissee, Appellant Pro Se. James J. Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia; Mark H. Reynolds, BUTSAVAGE & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Kissee appeals the district court’s order denying reliefon his employment discrimination action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e2(c) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kissee v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union , No. CA-01-58-4 (W.D. Va. May 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,261,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,699,191
<PP&E>                                      30,580,048
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,738,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,540,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,822,796
<BONDS>                                     32,785,269
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,067,484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,540,581
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,266,386
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,709,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               216,820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             690,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                318,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            318,303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   318,303
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .91<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50
<FN>
<F1>EPS PRIMARY - INCOME PER CLASS A UNIT
EPS DILUTED - INCOME PER CLASS B UNIT
</FN>


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20827

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MACIEJ RODZIEWICZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No.4:07-CR-140-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Maciej Rodziewicz presents

arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264

F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to

the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s

motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 2, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-20827

2
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2446 

To require the Congressional Budget Office to annually report changes in 

direct spending and revenue associated with the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2014 

Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To require the Congressional Budget Office to annually report changes in direct spending and revenue associated 

with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Obamacare 

5 Accounting Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2446 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE REPORTING ON 

2 THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORD3 ABLE CARE ACT. 

4 The Congressional Budget Office shall include in 

5 each annual report on the budget and economic outlook, 

6 and each revision of such a report, prepared under section 

7 202(e) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 

8 602(e)), information on the net effect that the enactment 

9 and implementation of the Patient Protection and Afford10 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and the Health Care 

11 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 

12 111–152) had on direct spending and revenue, including 

13 the net impact that such enactment and implementation 

14 had on deficit, both on-budget and off-budget. Such infor15 mation shall be disclosed in a manner similar to that pro16 vided for in table 2 of the Congressional Budget Office’s 

17 March 20, 2010, estimate of the budgetary effects of the 

18 Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 

19 and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TYRONE PAYNE.

July 23, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,139
<PP&E>                                           6,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              822
<BONDS>                                          1,638
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,945
<SALES>                                          2,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,468
<CGS>                                            2,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    22
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 28
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        28
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
<FN>
<F1>Net of interest income, $18 million, and capitalized interest, $26 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>