alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 CSAF announces CMSAF #18Published Nov. 16, 2016
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON, D.C.  --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein named Chief Master Sgt. Kaleth O. Wright to serve as the 18th Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Nov. 16, 2016. 
Wright will assume his new position in February, following the retirement of Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody.  Cody’s retirement culminates more than 32 years of service to the Air Force. 
“Chief Wright is absolutely the right choice as Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force #18 for our Air Force,” Goldfein said.  “He has experience in squadrons and major commands and in the deployed environment. He served in key leadership positions all along the way, leading our Airmen in almost every region of the world. I am positive he and Tonya will continue to serve tirelessly for our enlisted force as advocates for our Airmen and families. Dawn and I are excited to have them join our team.”
Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James echoed Goldfein's words and reflected on Cody’s time as Chief Master Sergeant. of the Air Force. 
“It was an absolute honor to serve with Chief Cody and Athena. They have shown a remarkable commitment and dedication to taking care of Airmen and their families," James said. "Chief Cody’s steadfast leadership in continuing to develop the enlisted force and fighting for our Airmen has been unrivaled. Over the past four years, he has made monumental changes which will continue to positively impact our enlisted force for years to come. I wish him and Athena the best as they begin the next chapter of their lives.”
Wright joined the Air Force in 1989, and is currently the command chief master sergeant for U.S. Air Forces in Europe and U.S. Air Forces Africa, headquartered at Ramstein Air Base, Germany.   His career includes various assignments in the dental career field and as the command chief master sergeant, 22nd Air Refueling Wing, McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas; 9th Air and Space Expeditionary Task Force-Afghanistan, Kabul; and 3rd Air Force and 17th Air Expeditionary Air Force, Ramstein AB.   
The office of the chief master sergeant of the Air Force represents the highest enlisted level of leadership, provides direction for the enlisted corps and represents their interests to the American public and all levels of government.  The CMSAF serves as a personal advisor to the Air Force Chief of Staff and Secretary of the Air Force on all issues regarding the welfare, readiness, morale, proper utilization, and progress of the enlisted force and their families.CMSAF 



CMSAF Cody 



new 



chief 



master 



sergeant 



air 



force 



new cmsaf 



Goldfein 



Wright 



retirement 



Change 



of 



Command 



18 



#18 Related Links
        CHIEF MASTER SERGEANT OF THE AIR FORCE KALETH O. WRIGHT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,386,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,921,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                   295,683
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,425,279
<PP&E>                                      27,708,888
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,818,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,687,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,120,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,980
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,373,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,687,332
<SALES>                                      2,845,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,845,028
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               (7,784,125)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,704,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,704,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,704,817)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  MachineTalker,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report")
I, Roland F. Bryan,  Chairman,  Chief Executive  Officer,  President,  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 17, 2007


\s\ Roland F. Bryan
-----------------------------------------------------
Roland F. Bryan, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Chief Financial Officer


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2197 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2197

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To repeal certain requirements regarding newspaper advertising of 
                      Senate stationery contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATE STATIONERY PROCEDURES.

    (a) In General.--Sections 65, 66, 67, and 68 of the Revised 
Statutes (2 U.S.C. 6569, 6570, 6571) are repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The fifth paragraph after the paragraph 
under the side heading ``For contingent expenses, namely:'' under the 
subheading ``senate.'' under the heading ``LEGISLATIVE.'' of the Act of 
March 3, 1887 (24 Stat. 596, chapter 392; 2 U.S.C. 6572), is amended by 
striking ``sections, sixty-five, sixty six, sixty-seven, sixty-eight, 
and sixty-nine,'' and inserting ``section 69''.

            Passed the Senate May 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2197

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To repeal certain requirements regarding newspaper advertising of 
                      Senate stationery contracts.
```
#### STATE v. BOWENS

No. 519P00

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 217

Petition by the Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 2001.

Justice Edmunds recused.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2517 

To prohibit bonuses to senior-level IRS executives until all Congressional 

requests for documents, including electronic communications, related to 

the investigation of IRS targeting of taxpayers are complete. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2014 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prohibit bonuses to senior-level IRS executives until all 

Congressional requests for documents, including electronic communications, related to the investigation of 

IRS targeting of taxpayers are complete. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Holding the IRS Lead5 ership Accountable Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2517 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON BONUSES UNTIL IRS COMPLIES 

2 WITH CONGRESSIONAL DOCUMENT RE3 QUESTS. 

4 The Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall not pro5 vide any performance award (including bonuses, step in6 creases, and leave time) to senior-level executives of the 

7 Internal Revenue Service until such time as the Treasury 

8 Inspector General for Tax Administration certifies that 

9 the Internal Revenue Service has provided all documents, 

10 including all electronic communications, requested by the 

11 relevant congressional committees in due course of their 

12 investigation into the targeting of certain taxpayers who 

13 applied for designation as an organization described in 

14 section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I,Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.             the Annual Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

2.             the information contained in the Annual Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Jeffrey P. Jacobs |
|   | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:                 | March 25, 2008 |

 

----
#### Bob BOURLAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46732.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1973.

Joe B. Goodwill, Beaumont, for appellant.

Tom Hanna, Dist. Atty., John R. DeWitt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Beaumont, Jim D. Vod-ers, State’s Atty., and Buddy Stevens, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of exhibiting obscene matter. Punishment was assessed by the court at a fine in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars.

Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. Al*9though no argument was presented under this point, and the appellant’s promised supplemental brief on this point was never filed, we find that under the rule announced by this court in Bryers v. State, 480 S.W.2d 712, the evidence is insufficient and the judgment must be reversed.

The information alleges that appellant did “knowingly exhibit to G. E. LeDoux an obscene motion picture at the Port Arthur, Cinema X, 324 Procter Street, Port Arthur, Jefferson County, Texas.” On a plea of not guilty the case was tried before the court on an agreed statement of facts stipulating that various identified persons would have testified to the matter as set forth. Nine still photographs taken of the film viewed appear in the record. However, the film itself was not introduced into evidence, was not viewed by the fact-finder below, and is not in the record before us. In Bryers, supra, this court said:

> *“ . .*. [W]e hold that the evidence is insufficient to sustain an obscenity conviction unless (1) the alleged obscene matter, in this case a film, is introduced into evidence or (2) the defendant expressly and affirmatively stipulates or admits that the material is obscene under the standards stated in Article 527 § 1 (A).”

The state in its supplemental brief points out that appellant stipulated that the state’s witnesses would testify to a contravention of each of the standards of Article 527, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., and urges that this should suffice as a stipulation that the material is obscene. With such a contention we cannot agree. A stipulation that certain testimony would be given obviously is not a stipulation that such testimony would be true. We find the record contains no express and affirmative stipulation or admission that the film is obscene under the standards in Article 527, Sec. 1(A), supra.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
News United States Air Force
 2-year probationary period now in effect for new civiliansPublished Nov. 21, 2016
                        
                        By Richard Salomon
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                All new federal employees appointed within the Defense Department to permanent positions in the competitive service are now required to serve a two-year probationary period. 
The new requirement took effect Nov. 26, 2015, as part of the fiscal year 2016 National Defense Authorization Act. The change does not apply to employees appointed prior to that date or to those appointed in excepted service. The Office of the Secretary of Defense issued a policy memorandum Sept. 27, 2016, highlighting the change.   
The probationary period is used to determine an employee’s competence for continued employment in the federal government. During that time, supervisors monitor their work and track their overall job performance.  
To ensure all Air Force civilian employees are aware of the change, the Air Force Personnel Center recently sent out more than 8,000 automated emails to Air Force employees who may be affected.
“We want to be proactive in getting the word out to our Air Force employees,” said Robbie Brown, the Civilian Force Management Branch chief. “Our goal is to ensure our civilians have the right information at the right time so they can manage their careers more effectively.” 
As stated in the OASD policy memorandum, the longer probation period is needed because much of an employee’s first year is spent in training, various office rotations and in other project-specific tasks. 
“The longer probation period gives employees more time to demonstrate their skills,” Brown said.  “It also allows supervisors to make proper performance assessments so they can more effectively evaluate job performance and work behaviors over time.” 
The one-year supervisory probationary period is not affected by the new two-year probationary period.  Employees who are newly appointed to a supervisory position who are required to serve both a supervisory probationary period and a two-year probationary period will serve them concurrently. 
The new requirement also applies to those newly appointed to career senior executive service positions.  Probationary periods can also vary when an employee is appointed to a new position outside his or her agency. 
For more information about the new two-year probationary period and Air Force personnel programs, go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.AETC 



civilian 



federal 



probationary period 



Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORDON SCOTT BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 368 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l.
Chartered Accountants
1250 René-Lévesque Boulevard West
Suite 2800
Montréal, Quebec
Canada H3B 2G4
Telephone +1 514 205-5000
Facsimile +1 514 876-1502    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS   We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of CAE Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2010, of our report dated May 13, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-97185) of CAE Inc. of our report dated May 13, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in CAE Inc.s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended March 31, 2010.    Chartered Accountants  Montréal, Quebec June 25, 2010         PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l., anOntariolimited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.


---
#### CENTEX HOMES OF NEW JERSEY, INC., CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EAST WINDSOR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.

February 5, 1985.

The parties to this matter having reached a settlement, and the appeal being therefore moot, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Order of this Court granting certification is hereby vacated.

We express no view on the opinion of the Appellate Division. (See 97 *N.J.*669)
#### KEMP v. KEMP

No. 262P00

Case below: 138 N.C. App. 167

352 N.C. 674

Petition by plaintiff to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 1 February 2001. The Court ex mero motu vacates its order entered 5 October 2000 denying plaintiffs peitition for writ of certiorari *377and allows plaintiffs petition for writ of certiorari for the purpose of reversing the order entered 16 May 2000 by the N.C. Court of Appeals denying plaintiffs petition for writ of certiorari and remanding the case to the Court of Appeals for determination on the merits.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

CAE Inc. (the“Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 2015 (the “Report”).

I, StéphaneLefebvre, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906of the U.S. Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i)                                                  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                                                 the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Stéphane Lefebvre                           

Stéphane Lefebvre

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

 

Date: June26, 2015
#### BERT SWERSKY v. THOMAS DANIEL GALLAGHER AND PTL. MARK MAXWELL.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 24.0
 
   The undersigned directors and officers of PFGI Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the
Corporation) which anticipates filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Corporations fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, hereby
constitute and appoint Susan M. Kinsey, David J. Lucido and Linda K. Erkkila, and each of them,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys or attorney of the undersigned, to
sign in the capacities indicated below, said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments and exhibits
thereto, or other documents to be filed with, or submitted to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission pertaining thereto, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and
things whatsoever required and necessary to be done in the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving the acts
of said attorneys, and any of them, and any such substitute.
  /s/ T. James Berry
    
    DirectorT. James Berry/s/ Jan M. Bone
    
    Director, Vice PresidentJan M. Bone/s/ Linda K. Erkkila
    
    Director, SecretaryLinda K. Erkkila/s/ Dett P. Hunter
    
    DirectorDett P. Hunter/s/ J. Richard Jordan
    
    Director, Vice President and Assistant SecretaryJ. Richard Jordan/s/ Susan M. Kinsey
    
    Director, President (Principal Executive Officer)Susan M. Kinsey/s/ David J. Lucido
    
    Director, Chief Financial Officers and TreasurerDavid J. Lucido
    
    (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ J. David Rosenberg
    
    DirectorJ. David Rosenberg/s/ John E. Rubenbauer
    
    DirectorJohn E. Rubenbauer