IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02745-BNB

WILLIAM L. GLADNEY,

Applicant,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents.

ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATION

Applicant, Wiliam L. Gladney, is a prisoner in the custody of the United States

Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and currently is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary

in Atwater, California. Mr. Gladney, acting pro se, filed an Application for a Writ of

Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction in the Adams

County District Court of Colorado in Case No. 08CR396. He has been granted leave to

proceed in form pauperis.

The Court must construe the Application liberally because Mr. Gladney is a pro

se litigant. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v. Bellmon, 935

F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). The Court, however, should not act as a pro se

litigant’s advocate. See Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110. For the reasons stated below, Mr.

Gladney will be ordered to file an Amended Application.

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District

Courts requires that Mr. Gladney go beyond notice pleading. See Blackledge v. Allison,

Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 14 Filed 03/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
2

431 U.S. 63, 75 n.7 (1977). Naked allegations of constitutional violations devoid of

factual support are not cognizable in a federal habeas action. See Ruark v. Gunter, 958

F.2d 318, 319 (10th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). Mr. Gladney must allege on the Courtapproved form both the claims he seeks to raise and the specific facts to support each

asserted claim. The Court has reviewed the Application submitted to the Court on

November 21, 2011, and finds that it is deficient. Mr. Gladney fails to assert on Pages

Four through Five a statement of the claims he intends to raise in this Court. Instead,

Mr. Gladney refers the Court to a memorandum he filed on October 21, 2011.

However, the Court is not responsible for reviewing any attached documents

submitted by Mr. Gladney to determine what claims and specific facts he intends to

raise in the instant action. Therefore, Mr. Gladney will be ordered to file an Amended

Application in which he identifies, on the Court-approved form, all the specific claims for

relief that he is asserting and the specific facts in support of each asserted claim. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order Mr. Gladney

file an Amended Application that complies with the Order. It is

 FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Gladney shall obtain the court-approved habeas

corpus form (with the assistance of his case manager or the facility’s legal assistant),

along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. It is

Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 14 Filed 03/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
3

FURTHER ORDERED that if Mr. Gladney fails within the time allowed to file an

Amended Application, as directed above, the action will be dismissed without further

notice.

DATED March 1, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 14 Filed 03/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3