Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Notices 60239 

been or will be exported from the 

United States. For purposes of this 

paragraph, servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for coniment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to any of the 

Denied Persons by affiliation, 

ownership, control, or position of 

responsibility in the conduct of trade or 

related services may also be made 

subject to the provisions of this Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the EAR where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the EAR are the foreign produced direct 

product of U.S.-origin technology. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the 

Respondents may, at any time, appeal 

this Order by filing a full written 

statement in support of the appeal with 

the Office of the Administrative Law 

Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing 

Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21202–4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request with the Assistant 

Secretary not later than 20 days before 

the expiration date and serving the 

request on the Respondents. The 

Respondents may oppose a request to 

renew this Order by filing a written 

submission with the Assistant Secretary 

of Commerce for Export Enforcement, 

which must be received not later than 

seven days before the expiration date of 

the Order. 

A copy of this Order shall be served 

on the Respondents and shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

This Order is effective as of the date 

that it is signed and shall remain in 

effect for 180 days. 

Entered this 1st day of October 2008. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. E8–23806 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Stanford University; Notice of Decision 

on Application for Duty-Free Entry of 

Electron Microscopes 

This is a decision pursuant to section 

6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and 

Cultural Materials Importation Act of 

1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by 

Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 

part 301). Related records can be viewed 

between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 

2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

14th and Constitution Avenue., NW., 

Washington, DC. 

Docket Number: 08–047. Applicant: 

Stanford University, Stanford, CA 

943005–5126. Instrument: Electron 

Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 F20 

TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

73 FR 54560, September 22, 2008. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: The foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Dated: October 6, 2008. 

Faye Robinson, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, 

Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–24202 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–475–818) 

Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of 

Extension of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 10, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

B. Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 

4014, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., 

NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 

(202) 482–6071. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 19, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published its notice of 

initiation of antidumping duty (AD) 

changed circumstances review (CCR). 

See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 72 FR 65010 

(November 19, 2007). On February 22, 

2008, the Department published its 

notice of preliminary results of AD CCR 

and intent to reinstate the AD order. See 

Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review 

and Intent to Reinstate the Antidumping 

Duty Order, 73 FR 9769 (February 22, 

2008). On August 12, 2008, the 

Department extended the due date of 

the final results of the AD CCR until 

October 6, 2008. See Certain Pasta from 

Italy: Notice of Extension of Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 73 FR 46871 

(August 12, 2008). On September 17, 

2008, Pasta Lensi S.r.L. (Lensi) and the 

American Italian Pasta Company (AIPC) 

requested to meet with officials from the 

Department regarding the AD CCR. That 

meeting is currently scheduled for 

October 8, 2008, after the current due 

date of the final results. On September 

29, 2008, the Department placed on the 

record of the AD CCR press releases 

from the United States Attorney for the 

Western District of Missouri and the 

Securities and Exchange Administration 

(SEC) regarding the AIPC. See the 

Memorandum to the File from Eric B. 

Greynolds, Program Manager, ‘‘Press 

Release from Office of the United States 

Attorney for the Western District of 

Missouri and the Securities and 

Exchange Commission Regarding the 

American Italian Pasta Company’’ 

(September 29, 2008), a public 

document on file in the Central Records 

Unit (CRU), room 1117 of the main 

Department building. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Under 19 CFR 351.216(e), the 

Department will issue the final results 

of a CCR within 270 days after the date 

on which the Department initiates the 

changed circumstances review. 

Currently, the final results of the AD 

CCR, which cover Lensi, a producer/ 

exporter of pasta from Italy, and AIPC, 

Lensi’s corporate parent and importer of 

subject merchandise produced by Lensi, 

are due by October 6, 2008. As 

explained above, the Department has 

placed certain information regarding 

Lensi on the record of the AD CCR. In 

addition, Lensi and AIPC have 

requested to meet with officials from the 

Department regarding the AD CCR. See 

Memorandum to the File from Eric B. 

Greynolds, Program Manager, ‘‘Request 

by Pasta Lensi S.r.L. for Meeting with 

Assistant Secretary’’ (September 30, 

2008), a public document on file in the 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES