alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. (the
Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Reserved.](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: April 14, 2006
    /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Chief Financial Officer Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this registration statement on Form S-4 filed by
Pure Resources, Inc. and this merger proxy statement filed by Titan Exploration,
Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2000, relating to the financial statements of
Union Oil's Permian Basin business unit, which appears in such registration
statement and merger proxy statement.  We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading  "Experts" in such registration statement and merger proxy
statement.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
April 17, 2000
**EXHIBT
      21**




**SUBSIDIARIES**




1.
      Sino
      Trade - Intelligent Development Corp. Limited., a corporation formed under
      the
      laws of Hong Kong.




2.
      Wah
      Mau Corporate Planning Development (Shenzhen) Company Limited (this is an
      English translation of the official Chinese name) - a corporation formed under
      the laws The People's Republic of China.





3.
      Idea
      Asia Limited, a corporation formed under the laws of Hong Kong.





4.
      China
      Media Power Limited, a corporation formed under the laws of Hong
      Kong.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,326
<SECURITIES>                                    19,334
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (574)
<INVENTORY>                                        258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,023
<PP&E>                                          16,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8,195)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,361
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,010)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,571
<SALES>                                         45,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,479
<CGS>                                            8,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,449)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.35)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000769333
<NAME> COLUMBIA LEASE INCOME FUND II-B FDS 9/30/97
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,547
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,408
<PP&E>                                       1,092,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                 907,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,773
<BONDS>                                        193,146
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,845,937
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,895,848)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,008
<SALES>                                        208,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,333
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               177,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (25,444)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,581
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Earnings Per Share Computations
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the Three Months Ended              For the Six Months Ended
                                           ------------------------------        --------------------------------
                                            August 24,         August 25,         August 24,           August 25,
                                               1997              1996               1997                 1996
                                           -----------       ------------        -----------         ------------
<S>                                        <C>               <C>                 <C>                 <C>
PRIMARY EPS:
Net loss                                   $(6,776,215)      $(47,646,753)       $(9,817,402)        $(49,501,196)
Accretion of discount and dividends
  on preferred stocks                          154,533            119,032            312,153              342,160
                                           -----------       ------------        -----------         ------------ 
Loss attributable to common
  stockholders                             $(6,930,748)      $(47,765,785)      $(10,129,555)        $(49,843,356)
                                           ===========       ============        ===========         ============
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                        26,348,574         25,706,935         26,306,219           25,012,072
Weighted shares issued
  from exercise and 
  assumed execise of:
  warrants                                          --                 --                 --                   --
  options                                           --                 --                 --                   --
                                           -----------       ------------        -----------         ------------ 
Shares for EPS
  calculation                               26,348,574         25,706,935         26,306,219           25,012,072
                                           ===========       ============        ===========         ============
REPORTED EPS:
Net loss                                        $(0.25)            $(1.85)            $(0.37)              $(1.98)
Accretion of discount and dividends
  on preferred stocks                            (0.01)             (0.01)             (0.01)               (0.01)
                                           -----------       ------------        -----------         ------------ 
Loss per common share                           $(0.26)            $(1.86)            $(0.38)              $(1.99)
                                           ===========       ============        ===========         ============
FULLY DILUTED EPS:

For the periods presented in this exhibit, there is no dilution from Primary
EPS.
</TABLE>


              This exhibit should be reviewed in conjunction with
             Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000505 

17-OCT-2013 

09:06 AM 

SCWC-12-0000505
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, LOCAL 636, AFL-CIO,


Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

NEIL ABERCROMBIE,1 Governor, State of Hawai'i; Kalbert K. Young,


Director, Department of Budget and Finance, State of Hawai'i;


Barbara A. Krieg, Director, Department of Human Resources


Development, State of Hawai'i; Ted Sakai, Director, Department of


Public Safety, State of Hawai'i;2 DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10 (2009-045),


Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. 


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000505; CIV. NO. 09-1-2145-09 PWB)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant United Public Workers,
 

AFSCME, LOCAL 636, AFL-CIO’s application for writ of certiorari
 

1
 During the pendency of this appeal, Neil Abercrombie, Governor of the 

State of Hawai'i, succeeded Linda Lingle. Thus, pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of 

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 43(c), Abercrombie has been substituted

automatically for Lingle in this case. 

2
 Kalbert K. Young, Director, Department of Budget and Finance, State 

of Hawai'i; Barbara A. Krieg, Director, Department of Human Resources

Development, State of Hawai'i; and Ted Sakai, Director, Department of Public 

Safety, State of Hawai'i have been substituted as parties to this appeal

pursuant to HRAP Rule 43(c). UPW also listed Linda Lingle’s Chief Policy

Advisor, Linda Smith, as a Defendant. This title does not exist in Governor 

Abercrombie’s current cabinet. 
filed on September 13, 2013, is hereby accepted and will be 


scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the
 

appellate clerk regarding scheduling.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 17, 2013. 

Herbert Takahashi,


Rebecca Covert, and


Davina Lam,


for petitioner
 

James Halvorson and
 

Richard Thomason,


for respondents
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40938 Summary Calendar

RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BOB GREEN, in his official capacity as Sheriff, Harrison County, TX., Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-32

- - - - - - - - - - May 19, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion filed by Raymond Williams, Texas prisoner #745695, to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is GRANTED. Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), we assess Williams an initial partial filing fee of $4.89. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the remainder will be deducted from Williams’s prisonNo. 96-40938 - 2 - trust-fund account until the entire filing fee of $105 is paid. § 1915(b)(2). IT IS ORDERED that Williams authorize the appropriate prison authorities having custody of Williams to forward the initial partial filing fee to the Clerk of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Thereafter, the agency shall forward, in accordance with § 1915(b)(2), to the Clerk of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income each time the amount in Williams’s account exceeds $10, until the appellate filing fee of $105 is paid. Regarding Williams’s challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous, we have reviewed Williams’s brief and the record and conclude that no abuse of discretion occurred. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). Williams’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). We caution Williams that future frivolous civil appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Williams is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.7

                      CONSENT OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS CORP.

        We hereby consent to the inclusion of our opinion letter dated May 3,
2000 to the Board of Directors of Aviation Group, Inc. ("Aviation") as Appendix
H to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus which forms a part of Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement")
relating to the proposed business combination between Aviation and
travelbyus.com ltd. and to the references to us and to such opinion in the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we come
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), nor do we admit that
we are experts with respect to any part of such Registration Statement within
the meaning of the term "expert" as used in the Securities Act.

/s/ CIBC World Markets Corp.

CIBC WORLD MARKETS CORP.
October 5, 2000
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2168 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition 

of large employer for purposes of applying the employer mandate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2014 

Ms. HEITKAMP (for herself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. 

MANCHIN, and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the definition of large employer for purposes of applying 

the employer mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Sta5 bility Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2168 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF LARGE EMPLOYER DEFINITION 

2 FOR PURPOSES OF THE EMPLOYER MAN3 DATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 

5 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘50 full-time employees’’ each 

8 place it appears in subparagraphs (A) and (B)(i) 

9 and inserting ‘‘100 full-time employees’’, and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘in excess of 50’’ in subpara11 graph (B)(i)(II) and inserting ‘‘in excess of 100’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem14 ber 31, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

 

**AMENDEDLIST OF**

**SIGNIFICANTSUBSIDIARIES OF GOLD FIELDS LIMITED**

(AS OF JUNE 30, 2005)

 

GFIMining South Africa (Proprietary) Limited, incorporated in South Africa.

 

GFLMining Services Limited, incorporated in South Africa

 

OrogenHoldings (BVI) Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

 

GoldFields Guernsey Limited, incorporated in the Isle of Guernsey

 

GoldFields Ghana Holdings Limited, incorporated in the Isle of Guernsey

 

GoldFields Ghana Limited, incorporated in Ghana

 

AbossoGoldfields Limited, incorporated in Ghana

 

GoldFields Australasia Limited, incorporated in the Isle of Man

 

GoldFields Australia Pty Limited, incorporated in Australia

 

St.Ives Gold Mining Company (Pty) Limited, incorporated in Australia

 

AgnewGold Mining Company (Pty) Limited, incorporated in Australia

 

GoldFields Corona BVI Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

 

GoldFields Exploration B.V., incorporated in the Netherlands

 

GoldFields Finland O.Y., incorporated in Finland

 

GoldFields Artic Platinum O.Y., incorporated in Finland

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reliv' International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
G. Kreher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                       RELIV' INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                 By:       /s/ David G. Kreher
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       David G. Kreher, Chief Financial Officer
#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES v. JOSEPH E. EGAN.

November 12, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2498

___________ Carlo Piccinino, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the Unite d States * District Court for the International United Auto, Aerospace * Eastern District of Missouri. and Agricultural Implement Workers of * America; General Motors Corporation, * G.M. Wentzville Assembly Center, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 6, 1997 Filed: October 14, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Carl Piccinino appeal s the district court & s grant of 1 summary ju dgment to International United Auto, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America-2-

(UAW) and General Motors Corporation (GM) in his hybri d § 30 1/fair representation suit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 185 et seq. , and DelCostello v. International Bhd. o f Teamsters , 462 U.S. 151 (1983). We affirm. Afte r de novo review of the record, see Carnes v . Unit ed Parcel Serv. Inc. , 51 F.3d 112, 116 (8th Cir
. 1995), we conclude that Piccinino failed to establish GM breached the Memoranda of Understanding. Both Piccinino & s sect ion 301 and fair representation claims thus fail
. See DelCostello , 462 U.S. at 164-65; Schiltz v
. Burlington N. R.R. , 115 F.3d 1407, 1415 (8th Cir. 1997).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the distric t co urt and deny plaintiff & s motion for appointment o f counsel. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.