alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian D. Cockerill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  |                                                                                                                                                     

|Date: October 24, 2007                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                                                             |  | 
|/s/ Ian D. CockerillIan D. Cockerill
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2458 

To provide student loan forgiveness for American Indian educators teaching 

in local educational agencies with a high percentage of American Indian 

students. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2014 

Mr. WALSH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide student loan forgiveness for American Indian 

educators teaching in local educational agencies with a 

high percentage of American Indian students. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Indian 

5 Teacher Loan Forgiveness Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2458 IS

1 SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR AMERICAN IN2 DIAN EDUCATORS TEACHING IN LOCAL EDU3 CATIONAL AGENCIES WITH A HIGH PERCENT4 AGE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS. 

5 (a) PART B LOANS.—Section 428J(c) of the Higher 

6 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078–10(c)) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) AMERICAN INDIAN TEACHERS IN LOCAL

9 EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE

10 OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS.—Notwithstanding 

11 the amount specified in paragraph (1) and the re12 quirements under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 

13 subsection (b)(1), the aggregate amount that the 

14 Secretary shall repay under this section shall be not 

15 more than $17,500 in the case of a borrower who— 

16 ‘‘(A) has been employed as a full-time 

17 teacher for 5 consecutive complete school years 

18 as a teacher in a local educational agency de19 scribed in section 7112(b) of the Elementary 

20 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 or in a 

21 school overseen by the Bureau of Indian Edu22 cation of the Department; and 

23 ‘‘(B) is a member of an Indian tribe (as 

24 defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Deter25 mination and Education Assistance Act (25 

26 U.S.C. 450b)).’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2458 IS

1 (b) PART D LOANS.—Section 460(c) of the Higher 

2 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087j(c)) is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(4) AMERICAN INDIAN TEACHERS IN LOCAL

5 EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE

6 OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS.—Notwithstanding 

7 the amount specified in paragraph (1) and the re8 quirements under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 

9 subsection (b)(1), the aggregate amount that the 

10 Secretary shall cancel under this section shall be not 

11 more than $17,500 in the case of a borrower who— 

12 ‘‘(A) has been employed as a full-time 

13 teacher for 5 consecutive complete school years 

14 as a teacher in a local educational agency de15 scribed in section 7112(b) of the Elementary 

16 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 or in a 

17 school overseen by the Bureau of Indian Edu18 cation of the Department; and 

19 ‘‘(B) is a member of an Indian tribe (as 

20 defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Deter21 mination and Education Assistance Act (25 

22 U.S.C. 450b)).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAMMY MELANSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3001

[May 21, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 562018CF000875A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin,

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended October 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                                             225
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   14,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      (502)
<INVENTORY>                                                      2,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                24,014
<PP&E>                                                           6,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (3,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  30,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           15,753
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               28
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      12,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    30,944
<SALES>                                                         38,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                38,124
<CGS>                                                           23,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   23,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                13,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               1,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     59
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 59
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        59
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PRICE DANIEL

ATTORNEY

GENERAL -,. R-556

; OPPICE OF 

# THE &PTORNEY 

# GENERAL

_

Ausmrv. TWXAS June 28, 1947
Hono~rableJohnH. Winters ,‘~ Executive Director State Depa~rtmentof, Public Welfare Austin, Texas Opinion Ro. V-273 Re: Court costs in a proceeding to appoint guardians to collect old age assistance where such a grant exceeds forty dollars per month. Dear Siri Werefer to your letter of June 4, 1947, in which you request answers to the following:

1. Mayprobate courts order that no costs or fees shall be charged in a proceeding to appoint aguardia~nto receive Old Age Assistance compensation from the State and/or Federal Government in excess of Forty Dollars per month? 2. If the ,Courts maynot waive the court costs if the grant exceeds Forty Dollars per month does this meanthat ,the department must, in each instance, establish the amountof the grant before the Co,urt can decide whether or not the court costs meybewaived? Probate Courts are not authorized to order ,that no costs or fees, shall be charged in probate proceedings in the absence of a law authorizing such an order. The law pertinent to your inquiry is Article 4123a-1 of Vernon’s Civil Statutes, which reads:

“Whenever a guardian is appointed for the purposes of enabling a person to receive not more than Forty ($40.00) Dollars am( era1 Government, the Court may, in its discretion, order that no costs orfees ‘.~ h 11 be charged in connection with the ir%eeding.”

..C

Honorable JohnH. Winters, Page 2

Thestatute is a grant of power to the probate court to order that no costs shall be charged in such proceedings. Thelanguage of the law is plain and unequivocal and such power maynot be enlarged by construction. It is limited to cases where the grant is under Forty Dollars per month.

Weare of the opinion that probate courts are not authorized to order that nocosts shall be charged in a proceeding to appoint a guardian to receive Old Age Assistance payments from the State and/or Federal Government in excess of Forty Dollars per month.

We donot construe the lawto permit a county court to decide whether the court costs maybe waived until it is ascertained, by such court that the compensation from the State and/or Federal Government does not exceed Forty Dollars per month. In order for the court to have the power to order that nofees need be paid, it mustbe established that less than $40.00 to be received. It is immaterial whether established byyour department or someone hearing of the case. per monthis this fact is else, on the
SUMMARY Probate courts are not authorized to order that no costs shall be charged in aproceeding to appoint a guardian to receive OldAgeAssistance payments from the State and/or Federal Government until it hasbeen ascertained that the grant of such payments does not exceed Forty Dollars per month. Art. 4123a-1, V.C.S. Yours very truly APPROVED

xkisR& RALOFTEXAS

Yy

. ‘I’

. r811iiams Assistant WTW: jrb
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN WASHINGTON.

June 13, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, D. Grant Macdonald, Chief Executive and FinancialOfficer of Online Consortium Corp (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that tothe best of my knowledge: 

| (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for    the year ended July 31, 2003  (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15    U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |
| (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                 |

> 
 

/s/ D. Grant Macdonald

D. Grant Macdonald

Chief Executive Officer 

January 5, 2004
Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------




                                       13
<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWMBS, INC.
                     CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THORUGH TRUST 2002-J2
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-J2

         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (a
"Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

         (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
         preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
         under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

         (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.


/s/ Joseph M. Candelario               Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER


/s/ Mark Wong                          Dated: March 27, 2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT


                                       14
#### UNION TOWNSHIP PBA LOCAL # 69 v. TOWNSHIP OF UNION.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /S/ Courtney CowgillCourtney CowgillChief Financial Officer
#### IN RE THOMPSON

No. 511P00

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 386

Petition by respondent (Gregory Thompson) for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 February 2001.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Form 10-K of Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:June 13, 2011By:/s/ Adam M. MizelAdam M. MizelChief Financial Officer and Chief Strategy Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Donald Houston DUKE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 17, 1974.

Donald Houston Duke, pro se.

Anthony M. Wilhoit, Public Defender, David E. Murrel, Deputy Public Defender, Frankfort, for appellant.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Alfred J. Welsh, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for ap-pellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner GARDNER,

Affirming.*

*

 Opinion ordered not to be published.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GARY BIANCO.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification granted. (See 205 *N.J.Super.*462)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                         [Letterhead of Arthur Andersen Appear Here]



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To BANK ONE CORPORATION:

We have examined the accompanying management's assertion about Bank One,
National Association's (as successor by merger to Bank One, Texas National
Association) (the "Servicer"), compliance with the covenants and conditions of
the Banc One Auto Grantor Trust 1997 - B Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of December 1, 1997 (the "Agreement") between the Servicer and The Bankers
Trust Company (as Trustee for the various Certficateholders and Enhancement
Providers) during the year ended December 31, 2000.  Management is responsible
for the Servicer's compliance with the Agreement.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Servicer's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Servicer's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Servicer complied with the
covenants and conditions of the Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2000
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 15, 2001
<PAGE>

                          Assertion by Bank One, N.A.


Bank One, N.A., as successor by merger to Bank One, Texas, N.A., services the
motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts for the Banc One Auto Grantor
Trust 1997-B.  As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, Bank One, N.A.
had complied, in all material respects, with the Banc One Auto Grantor Trust
1997-B Pooling and Servicing Agreement.



/s/ Tracie H. Klein                  /s/ James K. Kendrick
------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------
Tracie H. Klein                      James K. Kendrick
Vice President                       Retail Controller and Senior Vice President
Bank One, N.A.                       Bank One, N.A.
(Subsidiary of BANK ONE CORPORATION) (Subsidiary of BANK ONE CORPORATION)
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 231 

To reauthorize the Multinational Species Conservation Funds Semipostal 

Stamp. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Multinational Species Conservation Funds 

Semipostal Stamp. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multinational Species 

5 Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Reauthorization 

6 Act of 2013’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

8 Section 2(c)(2) of the Multinational Species Con9 servation Funds Semipostal Stamp Act of 2010 (39 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 231 IS

1 U.S.C. 416 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘6 years’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         199,942
<SECURITIES>                                   594,160
<RECEIVABLES>                                  453,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    243,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,585,775
<PP&E>                                       6,106,140
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,981,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,132,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          392,032
<BONDS>                                      2,229,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,739
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,505,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,132,804
<SALES>                                      1,260,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,638,024
<CGS>                                          817,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,677,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,982)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.005)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Matthew W.
Shankle


Matthew
W. Shankle


President,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer





May 20,
2009