alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Cinemas Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), each hereby
certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |  | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2003              



QuickLinks
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases annual sexual assault reportPublished May 1, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force reports of sexual assault increased slightly in fiscal year 2016, according to the service’s annual report on sexual assault released May 1.
The Air Force received 1,355 reports of sexual assault in fiscal 2016, compared to 1,312 in fiscal 2015.
Expressed as a percentage of the total Air Force population, including active duty, Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard, and appropriated fund civilian employees, 0.21% of Airmen reported a sexual assault in fiscal 2016 compared to 0.20% in fiscal 2015 and 0.21% in fiscal 2014, illustrating a flat trend for annual reports over the last three years.
"We must continue to drive a culture of prevention while ensuring victims readily come forward and report sexual assault,” said Acting Secretary of the Air Force Lisa Disbrow. “We must also be an Air Force that provides the care and support victims need while holding offenders accountable."
Prevention of sexual assault is the responsibility of every Airman, said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein.
"It's about trust,” said Goldfein. “The crime of sexual assault shatters trust and has a direct and negative impact on our capabilities as a warfighting force. In my opinion, there is no such thing as a bystander in this fight. We are all in. From the newest Airman to the most senior leader, every one of us has a responsibility to step forward and help stop sexual assault before it happens."
The results of the fiscal 2016 sexual assault report will be compared to data from the Defense Manpower Data Center’s 2016 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey, which is conducted every other year for the active duty service branches. The Air Force uses the Workplace and Gender Relations Survey to measure the prevalence of sexual assault in the force.
The Air Force compares prevalence rates to reporting rates to evaluate Airmen’s confidence in coming forward to report sexual assault and receive support. Ideally, the service wants to eliminate the gap between prevalence of the crime and the number of reports received, then see both numbers come down to zero, said Col. Mark Ramsey, the Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Operations Director.
“Our goal is to eliminate sexual assault from the Air Force, period,” said Ramsey. “We have leadership engaged at every echelon. We have provided our Airmen with both an awareness of this scourge in our ranks and the bystander intervention tools to engage. Our best chance of eradicating this crime from our Total Force is through strong leadership, being good wingmen, exercising the tools we’ve been given, and keeping true to our core values.”sexual assault 



 



sexual assault prevention 



Workplace and Gender relations survey 



SAF
Opinion filed March 7, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00038-CR

__________

RONALD JEROME CURTIS, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21001-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In 2003, Ronald Jerome Curtis pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of cocaine and 

was placed on community supervision. On January 20, 2012, the trial court revoked Curtis’s 

community supervision upon his plea of true to a motion to revoke and assessed his punishment 

at confinement for five years. We dismiss the appeal.

The clerk’s record indicates that Curtis’s sentence was imposed on January 20, 2012, and 

that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk’s office on February 8, 2013, more 

than one year after the date sentence was imposed. When the appeal was filed in this court, we

notified Curtis by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. We requested that 
2

Curtis respond and show grounds to continue this appeal. We also informed him that the appeal 

may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Curtis filed a response in which he asserts that the notice of appeal was timely. Curtis

states that he filed his notice of appeal with the trial court judge directly after his conviction and 

that he also filed his appeal on the same date with the district clerk. Curtis asserts that the court 

did not respond to his notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, however, does not support Curtis’s 

contention.

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, a notice of appeal is due to be filed within thirty days 

after the date that sentence is imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and 

filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The clerk’s record in this case 

reflects that Curtis’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court 385 days after 

sentence was imposed and was, therefore, untimely. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court 

lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1993). Because we have no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal.

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

March 7, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
News United States Air Force
 Razor Talon provides joint training for air, ground componentsPublished April 11, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Kenneth Boyton
                        
                        
                        4th Fighter Wing
                **SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, N.C. (AFNS) --**
                The opposing force scurried around the arid airfield to prepare for an oncoming attack. Without warning, a pair of A-10C Thunderbolt IIs screamed toward the airfield and simulated multiple strafing runs decimating a radar jammer.
A Tactical Air Control Party specialist embedded with the 82nd Airborne Division out of Fort Bragg, North Carolina, confirmed the target was destroyed from a hideout in the woods nearby.
A C-17 Globemaster III out of Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina, flew out of the clouds overhead and delivered simulated support of 82nd Airborne Division members who would parachute to the ground and take over the airfield by any means necessary.
Within a short amount of time, American forces gained control of the airfield and exercise Razor Talon continued.
“Razor Talon is an integral part of training,” said Capt. Dan Lusardi, a 75th Fighter Squadron A-10C pilot. “As an A-10 pilot, we rarely have a chance to practice with other branches and have our capabilities fully utilized. It’s rare that we practice both air-to-ground and air-to-air procedures, especially at the same time.”
Lusardi added this type of training not only sharpens pilots’ tactics, techniques and procedures, but also allows them to work better with other military branches during real world operations.
Maj. Mike Malone, the chief officer in charge for Razor Talon, said one of the main objectives of the exercise is to help Airmen better integrate with other branches and other aircraft.
“We want to integrate all military personnel so we can synchronize our effects and continue to dominate our adversaries as a unified fighting force,” said Malone.
Twenty-one aircraft supported this Razor Talon. Each aircraft played a pivotal role in the success of the exercise.
Fourteen of the aircraft were Seymour Johnson AFB F-15E Strike Eagles, which were tasked to simulate the destruction of ground targets. Four F-22 Raptors from Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia, fought simulated opposing forces in the air and on the ground, and two A-10s from Moody AFB, Georgia, provided close air support for ground forces.
“In a real world environment, there are a lot of moving parts,” Malone said. “Razor Talon allows us to join forces and use those moving parts at a good pace in a safer environment.”A-10 



Seymour Johnson AFB 



ACC 



Razor Talon 



F-15E 



Strike Eagle 



JTAC 



exercise 



LFE 



Charleston AFB 



Fort Bragg 



Langley AFB 



C-17 



Thunderbolt II 



Globemaster III 



Joint Training
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                       861
<INVENTORY>                                     22,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,627
<PP&E>                                         265,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,124
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,269
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (24,477)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,490
<CGS>                                          183,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,728)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,733)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR ACCOMPANYING
NOTES THERETO.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1930-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 23, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 29, 2010.

Calhoun, Clarke, Dallas, Keokuk, and Washington Counties for Public Assistance.

Hamilton and Ida Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-21603 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HAROLD VAUGHN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 11

- 00036

- CR

Appeal from the

371st District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1186711D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This dec ision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
814 A.2d 625

#### IN THE MATTER OF THADEUS A. TANSKI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

January 29, 2003.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court pursuant to *Rule*l:20-10(b), following a motion for discipline by consent of THADEUS A. TANSKI, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.3(diligence), *RPC*1.7(b) (a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client or to a third person, or by the lawyer’s own interests), *RPC*1.16(d) (upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated *RPC*1.1(a), *RPC*1.3, *RPC*1.7(b) and *RPC*1.16(d); and that such conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics violations and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

*154And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with *Rule*1:20 — 16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is Ordered that THADEUS A. TANSKI of GARFIELD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further;

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
September 19, 1996


VIA FACSIMILE MAIL

Lakeville Investors           The Balcor Company       Daniel J. Perlman, Esq.
c/o The Balcor Company        2355 Waukegan Road       Katten Muchin & Zavis
2355 Waukegan Road            Suite A200               Suite 2100
Suite A200                    Bannockburn, IL  60015   525 W. Monroe Street
Bannockburn, IL  60015        Attn:  Al Lieberman      Chicago, IL  60661
Attn:  Ilona Adams

     Re:  Agreement of Sale, dated as of the 23rd day of April, 1996 (the 
          "Agreement") between Lakeville Investors, as Seller, and ERP 
          Operating Limited Partnership, as Purchaser, for the purchase of 
          Lakeville Apartments, Petaluma, California (the "Property").

Dear Ms. Adams and Messrs. Lieberman and Perlman:

     Purchaser hereby requests that the Agreement be modified to change
"September 19, 1996" on the seventh line of Section 9 thereof to "October 1,
1996".  Please acknowledge Seller's acceptance of this modification to the
Agreement by executing this letter in the space provided below and returning it
via facsimile mail to Purchaser.


                                   ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
                                   an Illinois limited partnership

                                   By:  Equity Residential Properties Trust,
                                        a Maryland Real Estate Investment 
                                        Trust, its general partner

                                        By:  /s/ Shelley L. Dunck
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                 Shelley L. Dunck
                                                 Vice President
<PAGE>
Approved and Accepted this    day of October, 1996

LAKEVILLE INVESTORS

By:  Balcor Realty Investors 85-Series III A Real
     Estate Limited Partnership, a partner

     By:  Balcor Partners-XVIII, an Illinois
          general partnership, its general partner

          By:  The Balcor Company, a Delaware
               corporation, a general partner

          By:   /s/ John K. Powell, Jr.
               ------------------------------
          Name:  
          Title:    


By:  Lakeville Partners, an Illinois limited partnership,
     a partner

     By:  Balcor Partners-XIX, an Illinois general partnership,
          its general partner

          By:  The Balcor Company, a Delaware
               corporation, a general partner

          By:   /s/ John K. Powell, Jr.
               ------------------------------
          Name: 
          Title:      
<PAGE>
SHLDEX106Q12014




EXHIBIT 10.6


SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION 

ADDENDUM TO 
OFFER LETTER DATED MARCH 18, 2013




April 21, 2014
                
Edward S. Lampert 




As of April 4, 2014 (the “Distribution”), Sears Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) distributed, for each whole share of Sears Holdings common stock outstanding as of the close of business on March 24, 2014 (i.e., the “Record Date” for the Distribution), to the holder 0.300795 common shares of Lands’ End, Inc. (the “Lands’ End Shares”).
In accordance with the terms of your offer letter dated March 18, 2013, you are entitled to an annual stock award in the amount of $4.5 million, which annual award is paid in equal monthly installments of fully vested shares rather than a single, up-front award of restricted shares vesting in equal monthly installments. The total number of shares to be issued to you pursuant to the annual award through January 31, 2015 (i.e., 123,728), was calculated by dividing $4.5 million by the value of the Company’s common stock on January 31, 2014, a total of 113,418 shares of which are scheduled to be issued under the 2013 Plan subsequent to the Record Date (“Post-Record Date Shares”), subject to your continued service as Chief Executive Officer.  
Pursuant to action taken by the Company under the Sears Holdings Corporation 2013 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), a “Make-Whole Award” has been approved by which you will be awarded, in lieu of any and all rights to Lands’ End Shares with respect to the Post-Record Date Shares, additional shares of the Company’s common stock based on the value of the Lands’ End Shares that you would have received in the Distribution had the Post-Record Date Shares been issued on or before the Record Date.  The Make-Whole Award shall be issued in equal monthly installments on the last business day of each month through January 31, 2015, except that the monthly installment for March 2014 shall be issued on or about April 21, 2014, subject to the same terms that govern the issuance of the Post Record Date Shares.  The monthly installments are set forth in Annex A attached hereto.
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
/s/ Dean Carter
By:    Dean Carter
		
	Title: 
	VP, Talent and Human Capital Services










Annex A 
To Addendum To 
Offer Letter Dated March 18, 2013




	
				
	Date of Grant
	Post-Record Date Shares
	Make-Whole Award Shares
	Total Shares

	March 31, 2014
	10,311
	--
	10,311

	April 21, 2014
	--
	2,313
	2,313

	April 30, 2014
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	May 30, 2014
	10,310
	2,314
	12,624

	June 30, 2014
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	July 31, 2014
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	August 29, 2014
	10,310
	2,314
	12,624

	September 30, 2014
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	October 31, 2014
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	November 28, 2014
	10,310
	2,314
	12,624

	December 31, 2014
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	January 30, 2015
	10,311
	2,313
	12,624

	Total
	113,418
	25,446
	138,864