alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.4

ROGERS CABLE INC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(Amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars)

|                                           |      |              |  |                  |  |            |  |             |     |  |  |          |     |  |  |        | 
|------------------------------------------ | ---- | ------------ |  | ---------------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------- | --- |  |  | -------- | --- |  |  | ------ | 
|                                           |      | Balance,     |  |                  |  |            |  |            
|                                           |      | beginning of |  | Charged to costs |  |            |  | Balance,   
|                                           |      | year         |  | and expenses     |  | Deductions |  | end of year
|                                           |      |              |  |                  |  |            |  |            
|Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable |      |              |  |                  |  |            |  |             |     |  |  |          |     |  |  |       
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|Year ended December 31:                    |      |              |  |                  |  |            |  |             |     |  |  |          |     |  |  |       
|                                           | 2001 |              |  | 5,435            |  |            |  | 13,741      | (1) |  |  | (11,711) | (2) |  |  | 7.465  | 
|                                           | 2002 |              |  | 7,465            |  |            |  | 18,626      | (1) |  |  | (15,971) | (2) |  |  | 10,120 | 
|                                           | 2003 |              |  | 10,120           |  |            |  | 20,028      | (1) |  |  | (21,810) | (2) |  |  | 8,338  | 

Notes:



|    |                                                                                                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | Represents increase in allowance for doubtful accounts
    receivable charged to expense.                 
|   
|(2) | Represents the accounts receivable written-off against the
    allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

The schedule contains summary financial information from Trump's Castle Funding,
Inc. This data has been extracted from the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three month period ended
March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Financial Statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000770618
<NAME>                    Trump's Castle Funding, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,056
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,061
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (11,061)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         573,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,546,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,228,603
<PP&E>                                      89,979,358
<DEPRECIATION>                             (49,779,760)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,364,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,151,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,279
<OTHER-SE>                                 (26,898,540)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,364,669
<SALES>                                     12,505,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,505,885
<CGS>                                        6,883,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,442,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               493,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (7,530,474)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,973,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (10,973,789)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-K Annual Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ STEPHANIE D. LEPORI                                                                                          
|                      |  |     |  | Stephanie D. Lepori, Chief Financial Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STANLEY WASHINGTON.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### LOUIS W. ZELTNER v. JOSEPH CANNON.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 21.1



PARTHUSCEVA, INC.



Subsidiaries



The following are the subsidiaries of ParthusCeva, Inc.



|Name                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|-------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|ParthusCeva (NI) Limited               |  | Northern Ireland             
|ParthusCeva (UK) Limited               |  | Northern Ireland             
|ParthusCeva Communications Limited     |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Design Limited             |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Development Inc.           |  | California                   
|ParthusCeva Holdings BV                |  | The Netherlands              
|ParthusCeva Inc.                       |  | Cayman Islands               
|ParthusCeva Ireland Limited            |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Ltd                        |  | Israel                       
|ParthusCeva Research Limited           |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Services Limited           |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Software Limited           |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Systems Inc.               |  | Delaware                     
|ParthusCeva Technologies Japan Limited |  | Japan                        
|ParthusCeva Technologies Limited       |  | Republic of Ireland          
|ParthusCeva Technologies Limited       |  | Hong Kong                    
|ParthusCeva Technologies SARL          |  | France                       
|ParthusCeva SARL                       |  | France                       
|ParthusCeva Technologies, Inc          |  | Delaware
EXHIBIT 10.4

SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

Summit Networks Inc.

Jaunciema gatve 40,

Ziemeļu rajons, Rīga,

LV-1023, Latvia

 

Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, the undersigned (the “Purchaser”) is purchasing

 

_______________________________________________ (___________) shares of Common Stock of Summit Networks Inc. (the “Company”) at a price of $0.04 per Share (the “Subscription Price”).

 

Purchaser hereby confirms the subscription for and purchase of said number of shares and hereby agrees to pay herewith the Subscription price for such Shares.

 

Purchaser further confirms that Andris Berzins, President of Summit Networks Inc. solicited him/her/it to purchase the shares of Common Stock of the Company and no other person participated in such solicitation other than Mr. Berzins.

 

PLEASE MAKE CHECK, BANK DRAFT, MONEY ORDER OR CASHIER’S CHECK PAYABLE TO SUMMIT NETWORKS INC.

 

Executed this ______ day of ___________________________, 201__.

 

_______________________________________________________

(Print Name of Purchaser)

 

_______________________________________________________

(Address of Purchaser)

 

_______________________________________________________

(City, Province or State, Postal Code)

 

_______________________________________________________

(Signature of Purchaser)

 

PLEASE ENSURE FUNDS ARE IN US DOLLARS

 

 

	
 

	
 x

	
$.04 PER SHARE = US$  

	
 

	
 


	
(No of Shares Purchased)

	
 

	
 

	
(Total Subscription Price)

	
 




 

Accepted by:

 

SUMMIT NETWORKS INC.

 

	
By:

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(Andris Berzins, President)

	
 

	
Date
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Security and Exchange Act of 1934; Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Troy H. Lowrie, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officerof VCG Holding Corp. (the “Company”), certify, that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VCG Holding Corp.; 

 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I haveindicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: April 14, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2137 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2137

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To ensure that holders of flood insurance policies under the National 
Flood Insurance Program do not receive premium refunds for coverage of 
                             second homes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO REFUNDS UNDER NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR 
              COVERAGE OF SECOND HOMES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``National Flood 
Insurance Program'' means the program established under the National 
Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.).
    (b) No Refunds for Coverage of Second Homes.--Notwithstanding 
section 3(a)(4) of the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 
2014 or any other provision of law, in the case of flood insurance 
coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program for a residential 
property that is not the primary residence of an individual (as that 
term is used in section 1307(a)(2)(A) of the National Flood Insurance 
Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4014(a)(2)(A))), the Administrator of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency may not refund any premium for such 
coverage collected in excess of the rates required under the provisions 
of, and amendments made by, section 3 of the Homeowner Flood Insurance 
Affordability Act of 2014.

            Passed the Senate March 13, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2137

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To ensure that holders of flood insurance policies under the National 
Flood Insurance Program do not receive premium refunds for coverage of 
                             second homes.
```
#### BUELL REALTY NOTE COLLECTION TRUST, Petitioner, v. CENTRAL OAK INVESTMENT COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. B-3527.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1972.

James P. Swift, Dallas, for petitioner.

McKool, McKool, Jones, Shoemaker & Turley, Bill Jones, Dallas, for respondents.

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

This is a controversy between a mortgagee, petitioner, and the landowners, respondents, over the proceeds of an award in an eminent domain proceeding. Part of the land on which petitioner holds a lien to secure its indebtedness was condemned for public use, and the amount of the award was deposited by the condemning authority in the registry of the County Court at Law. Petitioner then brought this suit in district court. The trial court held that respondents are entitled to the entire award, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 483 S.W.2d 24.

Petitioner insists that the entire award should be paid to it and applied on the mortgage debt. We are satisfied that it is not entitled to that relief under the facts of the case. There is no contention that the proceeds of the award should be allocated to the parties on the basis of a mathematical formula that will preserve some established relationship between the indebtedness and the property securing its payment, and we have made no attempt to determine whether such a rule might be appropriate in cases of this nature. The application for writ of error is Refused, No Reversible Error.
News United States Air Force
 AF selects Shaw AFB as the preferred location to host a new RPA unitPublished Jan. 12, 2017
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, as the preferred location to base a new MQ-9 Reaper group, including mission control elements.Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona; Moody AFB, Georgia; Mountain Home AFB, Idaho; and Offutt AFB, Nebraska, were named as reasonable alternatives and will be considered as part of the environmental impact analysis process.“Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance continues to be the number one most requested capability of combatant commanders and I believe adding additional RPA locations will help our efforts to retain experienced RPA operators that contribute to this vital mission,” said Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James.The desire for additional locations for MQ-9 assignments was identified during surveys of officers and enlisted Airmen as part of Air Combat Command’s Culture and Process Improvement Program. CPIP is a series of initiatives designed to address challenges and stressors affecting the MQ-1B Predator and MQ-9 communities. “Shaw AFB was selected because it was the best option to help us diversify assignment opportunities for personnel within the MQ-9 enterprise, provide increased opportunities for leadership from within the community, and provide flexibility to enhance integration with other organizations and capabilities,” James added. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein echoed those sentiments, noting “remotely piloted aircraft and associated intelligence operations are and will remain a vital component for the national security of the United States and our allies. Providing additional RPA basing locations can provide greater development and quality of life opportunities so we can provide combatant commanders with the best trained operators to perform this critical mission.”  The first Airmen assigned to the new group are expected to begin arriving there in fiscal year 2018 although no RPAs will be based at the location as a result of this action.In addition to this action, the Air Force is also considering another location to host an MQ-9 wing that includes up to 24 MQ-9s, launch and recovery elements, a mission control element, a maintenance group and support personnel.MQ-9 



RPA 



ACC 



Shaw AFB
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1
------------

                         Independent Auditors' Consent


Board of Directors
Data Race, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 33-
75800, No. 333-24303, No. 333-24305, No. 333-72505 and No. 333-77713) on Form S-
8 and in the Registration Statements (No. 333-22605, No. 333-42203, No. 333-
53757, No. 333-62147, No. 333-71319 and No. 333-83595) on Form S-3 of DATA RACE,
Inc. of our report dated September 11, 2000, relating to the balance sheets of
DATA RACE, Inc. as of June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended June 30, 2000, which report appears in the June 30, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of DATA RACE, Inc.



                                         KPMG LLP

San Antonio, Texas
September 28, 2000
Exhibit 31.2





BILL BARRETT CORPORATION


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, William M. Crawford, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                           
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017, of Bill Barrett Corporation; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date:March 19, 2018By:/s/ William M. CrawfordWilliam M. CrawfordSenior Vice President-Treasury and Finance(Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SAMUEL PEREZ.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.