alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henry GILES, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46309.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1973.

Malcolm Dade, Dallas, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for assault with intent to murder without malice; the punishment, three years imprisonment.

The appellant’s only ground of error is that “the evidence is insufficient to sustain the jury’s findings of assault to murder without malice.”

The indictment charged the appellant with assault with intent to murder Johnny L. Taylor.

Rosemary Giles, the ex-wife of the appellant, lived with their two children in a house they had formerly owned and which had been awarded to her in the divorce decree. Following their divorce, she had become acquainted with Taylor, the victim of the attack, and on the night in question, Taylor was visiting her at her house and both were on the bed watching television.

At about 1:20 a. m. Mrs. Giles received a telephone call from the appellant, in which he told her, “Rose, I’m going to kill you.” She came back to the bed after the telephone call and within a short period of time a shotgun blast was fired through a window of the bedroom and the appellant “yelled, T am going to kill you both.’ ” Two more shotgun blasts were fired into the bedroom, but they did not strike either Taylor, Mrs. Giles or her young son, who was also in the room. The third shot was fired into the mattress in the bed. Appellant broke into the house and, while still holding the shotgun, told Taylor, “Now, I’m going to kill you.”

The appellant then dropped the single-shot shotgun and attacked Taylor with a long butcher knife, which Mrs. Giles said had been on the drainboard in the kitchen. The appellant repeated, “I’ve got you now. I’m going to kill you.” In the fight which followed, the victim was “stabbed” in the side and in the arm with the knife. The appellant was not subdued until after two police officers who had been summoned arrived and placed handcuffs on him.

The stab wound in Taylor’s midsection resulted in injury to the “spleen and the bowels” which required surgery and that the victim remain in the hospital for over eight days. The wounds left a four or five inch scar on his arm and after surgery, an eight to ten inch scar on his abdomen.

*287Some days before the night of the attack, the appellant had told Taylor that if he, Taylor, “messed around, that (he) was going to get killed.”

We find the evidence amply sufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21863]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of 
the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on September 8, 
2010, from 1:30 p.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 
883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Closed Sesson

    <bullet> Report on System Performance.

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> June 10, 2010 (Open and Closed).

B. Business Reports

    <bullet> Quarterly Financial Reports.
    <bullet> Report on Insured and Other Obligations.
    <bullet> Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan.

C. New Business

    <bullet> Annual Performance Plan FY 2011-2012.
    <bullet> Proposed 2011 and 2012 Budgets.
    <bullet> Insurance Fund Progress Review and Setting of Premium 
Range Guidance for 2011.

    Dated: August 26, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-21863 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), John M. Carradine, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany and Ronald K. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer, do each hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| By: /s/ John M. Carradine |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
| John M. Carradine         |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
| August 10, 2007           |
|                      |
|                      |
| By: /s/ Ronald K. Herbert |   |
|                      |
| Ronald K. Herbert         |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| August 10, 2007           |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52931-52932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1703]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 126 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; Reno, NV

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in 
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) 
as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose 
zones;
    Whereas, the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 126, submitted an application to the 
Board (FTZ Docket 26-2010, filed 4/19/2010) for authority to reorganize 
under the ASF with a service area of Carson City, Douglas and Storey 
Counties as well as portions of Churchill, Lyon and Washoe Counties, 
Nevada, in and adjacent to the Reno Customs and Border Protection port 
of entry, FTZ 126's existing Sites 1, 4-14 and 17 would be categorized 
as magnet sites, existing Sites 2, 3, 15 and 16 would be categorized as 
usage-driven sites, and the grantee proposes two additional usage-
driven sites (Sites 18 and 19);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 21594-21595, 4/26/10) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the

[[Page 52932]]

requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and 
that the proposal is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 126 under the alternative site 
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to 
a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate 
authority for Sites 1, 4, 5, 7-14 and 17 if not activated by August 31, 
2015, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites 
that would terminate authority for Sites 2, 3, 15-16 and 18-19 if no 
foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose 
by August 31, 2013.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of August 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21573 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
News United States Air Force
 Embracing diversity by leading from the frontPublished June 9, 2016
                        
                        By Col. Greg Gilmour
                        
                        
                        315th Airlift Wing commander
                **JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, S.C. (AFNS) --**
                Often times when we hear terms like diversity and inclusion, we think of them more as buzz words or a way to hold someone accountable for not doing the right thing.But what does diversity actually mean to us in the Air Force? To me, it’s simple: place the right people in the right positions to execute our mission.I recently had the opportunity to reflect on this after I selected the incoming 315th Maintenance Group commander, who just happens to be a woman. Looking over our organization I realized that in a male-dominated community, we are certainly unique. Soon, all three group commanders in the 315th Airlift Wing will be females as well as our vice wing commander and one O-6 squadron commander. In the Air Force, women comprise 29 percent of the total force and, according to a recent study by Diversity Central, in the civilian sector women only hold 6 percent of chief executive roles in America. So, this may leave a person to wonder, why do women hold two-thirds of the senior leader positions in the 315th AW? I think that answer is also simple. We placed the right people in the right positions to move our mission, regardless of the visible or invisible attributes that contribute to diversity within our ranks. These attributes include things like gender, race, and age as well as education, religion or sexual orientation, just to name a few.So, does this mean that the days of inequality are over and the glass ceiling has been shattered? Certainly not, and we have a long way to go. But, if we recognize that there are cultural and stereotypical biases in each one of us, and fight to overcome those biases, we will be well on our way to leveling the playing field for all Airmen. As I think about how, as an Air Force, we can continue this trend of promoting the best and brightest by leveraging the best talent we have and capitalize on opportunities. I can tell you that the process does not start at the wing commander level; it starts with every Airman and every supervisor. I charge every one of you to personally evaluate your internal biases, regardless of how small, set them aside and always continue to push our Air Force forward. I would love to see a day when statistics are no longer needed and the best individual is always pushed to the top, regardless of gender. We have the world’s most powerful Air Force and the reason for that is not because of our weapon systems, it is because of our Airmen. So, take care of each other, embrace your core value of integrity first, and always recognize your best and brightest no matter what.diversity 



commentary
#### STATE v. BARNETT

No. 64A01

Case below: 141 N.C. App. 378

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 June 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 7 June 2001.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: April 7Published April 7, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, a team of communication specialists travel to Kodiak Island, Alaska, to provide communication assistance and Air Force Global Strike Command stands up a nuclear command, control and communications center. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith.
For previous episodes, click here.ATAF 



nuclear 



Command and Control 



communications 



AFGSC 



Alaska 



PACAF 



Kodiak Island
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2002-B
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       OF
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2002-B and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of June 1,
2002 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and covenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2004.

                          CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2002-B
                          BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                          capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                          /s/ Mary Kay Pupillo
                          ---------------------------------------
                          Name: Mary Kay Pupillo
                          Title: Senior Financial Services Officer


         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                          CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                          NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer


                          /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                          --------------------------------------
                          Richard J. Naeder
                          Authorized Signatory
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 18 35

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Apo ll y on Kenn ed y -Bey

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Met ro po li ta n C ou nc il ; Emm an ue l M art in ez Cruz ; J oh n S te el e; Mat th ew Brak e; Tim ot hy Asp, ea ch in hi s o ffi ci al cap aci ty as a Me tro Tran si t Po li ce Offi cer

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta - Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Marc h 1 , 20 18 Fi le d: Apri l 3 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, MURPHY, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.In th is pr o se 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n, Apo ll y on Ken ne dy-Bey ap pe al s aft er

th e d is tri ct co ur t ad ve rs el y gra nt ed su m

m ary jud gm en t. 1

Hav in g care fu ll y rev ie wed th e reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we
co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in st rik in g Ken ne dy-Bey ’s

un ti m el y am en de d com

pl ai nt , se e Km ak v. Am

. Cen tu ry Co s., 873 F.3 d 10 30 , 10 34 (8 th Ci r. 20 17 ) ( s t a n d a r d of rev ie w), an d pr op erl y gr an te d su m m ary jud gm en t, se e Bea ul ie u v. Lud em an , 69 0 F.3 d 10 17 , 10 24 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (g ran t o f s umm ary jud gm en t is rev ie wed de no vo , vi ewin g reco rd in li gh t m os t fav or ab le to no nm ov an t);

se e al so Ci ty o f Los Ang el es v. Ly on s, 46 1 U.S. 9 5, 10 9, 11 1 ( 1 9 8 3 ) ( p l a in ti ff was
no t en ti tl ed to in

jun ct io n whe re th ere was no sh owi ng of an y real or im m ed ia te th reat th at pl ai nt iff wou ld be wro ng ed a g ai n) ; Mo nr oe v. Ark

. St at e Uni v., 49 5 F.3 d 59 1, 59 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) (Ele ve nt h Am en dm en t b a r s s u i t s fo r an y ki nd of rel ie f ag ai ns t st at es an d st at e ag en ci es ); Mu rp hy v. St at e of Ark ., 12 7 F.3 d 75 0, 75 4 (8 th Ci r. 19 97 ) (§ 19 83 cl ai m s fo r da m ag es ag ai ns t de fen da nt s in th ei r of fic ia l cap aci t i e s were ba rred ). Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Don ov an W

. Fran k, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju d g e f or th e 1 Dis tri ct of Mi nn es ot a, ad op ti ng th e r e p o r t an d reco m m en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab le Leo I. Bri sb oi s, Un it edSta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

. -2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consoli dated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations found
on pages 3 and 4 of the  Company`s Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended
December 31, 1996, and is qualified in  its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768914
<NAME>                        TECHNOLOGY GENERAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         335,410
<SECURITIES>                                   165,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  411,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,000
<INVENTORY>                                    610,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,603,656
<PP&E>                                         6,347,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,301,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,903,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          457,198
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,648
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,826,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,903,166
<SALES>                                        1,902,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,316,608
<CGS>                                          1,228,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,458,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (423,734)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                281,466
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            281,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   281,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .005
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
        BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**
 **THE
        MIDDLEBY CORPORATION**
 **PURSUANT
        TO RULE 13A-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**
 
 This
        certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and 18 U.S.C. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 I,
        Selim
        A. Bassoul, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
        officer) of The Middleby Corporation (the “Registrant”), certify, to the best of
        my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
        for the
        period ended March 29, 2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”), that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Exchange Act; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  aspects, the financial `condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant.
 
 Date:
        August 6, 2008
 
 /s/
        Selim A. Bassoul
 Selim
        A.
        Bassoul