alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 AETC reflects on the value of duty within the First CommandPublished March 15, 2017
                        
                        By Christa D’Andrea
                        
                        
                        Profession of Arms Center of Excellence
                
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS)**-- “Every Airman bears a responsibility – not to self, but to our fellow Airmen, to our country. To ensure that when we hang up our uniform at the end of the day, the world’s greatest Air Force is even greater than before.”
These opening lines come from the Profession of Arms Center of Excellence’s newest Heritage Today video unveiled March 7, 2017, during the Air Education and Training Command’s Senior Leadership Conference at Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas. 
The video exemplifies the importance of serving in the First Command.
“Airpower starts here in AETC,” said Lt. Gen. Darryl Roberson, the AETC commander. “Serving as a recruiter, instructor or in a duty within the command is a valuable and necessary step in any Airman’s career.”
More than 300,000 students flow through AETC annually and are taught, led and supported by more than 60,000 Airmen and civilians.
“This is the command where you have the opportunity to forge innovative and agile Airmen and help them develop the necessary skills to excel in their profession,” Roberson said.
The Heritage Today series is designed to inspire Airmen through stories of Air Force heritage linked to current real-world Air Force operations. “The First Command – An Endless Legacy” is the second video to be produced featuring a major command.
Tech. Sgt. Raymond Santiago, a basic military training instructor, auditioned and was selected to voice the video.
“I have been a part of AETC for the last eight years and it has given me an opportunity to grow as an NCO and a person,” he said. “AETC provides Airmen the opportunity to develop and become better than you were yesterday.”
Santiago added that he has seen the impact transitioning civilians into Airmen makes and “this video captures the essence of who we are and what we can achieve.”
PACE is the Air Force’s formal commitment to institutionalizing professionalism to help develop Airmen who embody the core values. PACE initiatives include infusing professionalism into existing training venues such as First Term Airmen’s Centers and Squadron Officer Course; and delivering the affective instructional seminar “Enhancing Human Capital,” to ensure Airmen receive a continuum of professionalism development training at the appropriate touch points throughout their careers.AETC 



BMT 



MTL 



MTI 



JB San Antonio-Lackland 



PACE 



recruiter
#### Ex parte Paul J. HERNANDEZ.

No. 46057.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1972.

Robert L. Thomas, Goodwin & Matheny by Michael D. Matheny, Beaumont, for appellant.

Tom Hanna, Dist. Atty., John R. De Witt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Beaumont, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding, remanding appellant to custody for extradition to the State of Louisiana.

At the hearing, the State introduced the Extradition Warrant of the Governor of this State directing the arrest of the appellant and his delivery to the agents of the State of Louisiana for return to that State. The Extradition Warrant appears regular on its face and makes out a prima facie case authorizing the remand of the appellant to custody for extradition. Ex parte Browder, Tex.Cr.App., 373 S.W.2d 751.

The appellant introduced the Demand of the Governor of Florida requesting appellant’s extradition and its supporting papers.

Appellant’s sole contention is that there is no showing appellant is substantially charged with a crime under the laws of Texas.

The record reflects petitioner stands charged in Louisiana by information for the crime of theft. The record also contains a supporting affidavit and a warrant issued thereon. Petitioner claims that, in *300an absence of a showing of Louisiana law, he may not be extradited on the basis of these documents since Texas does not permit a felony prosecution upon an information. In Ex parte Beckham, Tex.Cr.App., 468 S.W.2d 446, we said:

> “[Article 51.13, Section 3, V.A.C.C.P.] provides that the Governor may not issue his warrant unless there are sufficient papers to support the issuance of the warrant. An ‘information supported by affidavit’ is sufficient to support the warrant. The Governor’s warrant, which is regular on its face, states that appellant is charged by ‘information, supporting affidavit, warrant.’ ”

Appellant’s contention is without merit. Ex parte Posey, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 833; Ex parte Clubb, Tex.Cr.App., 447 S.W.2d 185; Ex parte Kallie, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 784.

The order is affirmed.

No motion for rehearing will be filed or entertained by the Clerk except by leave of this Court after good cause has been shown.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 06-30494

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus VANCE ROOKS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport Div.

USDC No. 5:04-CR-50067-ALL

_________________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * We AFFIRM Rooks’s convictions. The jury instruction properly stated the jury could find Rooks guilty of either receiving or distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) because the statute is unambiguous and because “a disjunctive statute may be pleaded conjunctively and proved disjunctively.” See United States v. Harrelson , 705 F.2d 733, 736 (5th Cir. 1983). Furthermore, Rooks’s receiving conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) and his possession conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2 252A(a)(5) are neither multiplicitous nor violate the2

Fifth Amendment because they are different crimes: a person can possess child pornography he manufactured , and a person might no longer possess child pornography he once received. We also note that the two convictions were for different images of child pornography. AFFIRMED.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000420 18-OCT-2013 08:32 AM
216 La. 759

#### PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. STATE MINERAL BOARD et al.

No. 39652.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1950.

R. K. Batten, Houston, Tex., Charles F. Bailey, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., Carroll Buck, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., John L. Madden, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant-appel-lee.

McCALEB, Justice.

This case was consolidated for al-1 purposes with the suit of The Texas Company v. State Mineral Board et al., 216 La. 742, 44 So.2d 841. The decision in that matter controls here.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 
  

	[*]	indicates that a confidential portion of the text of this agreement has been omitted. The non-public information has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 


TVA Tract No. XENC-3L 

AMENDMENT TWO TO LEASE 

This Amendment Two to Lease (“Amendment”) is effective as of August 30, 2012, by and between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
acting herein by and through its legal agent, the Tennessee Valley Authority, a corporation created and existing under an Act of Congress known as the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, as amended (sometimes herein referred to as
“TVA”), and Ruger Coal Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “Lessee”). 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the parties hereby agree to amend certain terms and conditions of the Illinois Coal Lease dated July 1, 2002, and amended
as of April 17, 2012, between the Lessor and Illinois Fuel Company, LLC, later assigned to Ruger Coal Company LLC, as Lessee, said Coal Lease being duly identified in TVA’s land records as TVA Tract No. XENC-3L (the “Lease”);

 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and other provisions recited herein, the Lessor and Lessee hereby modify
and amend Section 4, Production Royalty, of the Lease by inserting the following language at the end of the first paragraph of said Section: 

The Lessor hereby agrees that if within two years of August 30, 2012, Lessee or its designee: (1) begins material northward
development for a second longwall mining section located partially on the leased premises as depicted on the project map attached to this Amendment Two as Exhibit A and made a part hereof, and (2) Lessee or its designee executes a
definitive purchase agreement for a second long wall system to be installed in the area designated as A or B on Exhibit A, then, through April 16, 2027, Lessee shall pay Lessor a reduced basic tonnage








 
royalty as follows: (1) the sum of [*] on each ton of 2,000 pounds on all coal mined and removed by Lessee from the area designated as “Area B” as set forth on Exhibit A; and (2) the
sum of [*] on each ton of 2,000 pounds on all coal mined and removed by Lessee from the area designated as “Area A” on Exhibit A. 

All other terms and conditions set forth in the Lease which are not specifically amended hereby are to continue in full force and effect as
currently written. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF: 
  

			
	LESSOR:
	
	TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert M. Deacy, Sr.

	
	Name (Printed): Robert M. Deacy, Sr.
		
	Title:	 	 Senior VP–Gen. Construction

		
	Date:	 	 8/29/2012

	
	LESSEE:
	
	RUGER COAL COMPANY, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Donald R. Holcomb

	
	Name (printed):
		
	Title:	 	 Authorized Person

		
	DateL	 	 8-29-12
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

I, Stephen Purcell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form
40-F of Novadaq Technologies Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuers
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 19, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen Purcell    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Stephen Purcell        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                        Washington, D.C.  20549

                             FORM 10 - QSB

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER REGULATION SB OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
                                 1934

For the Quarter Ended                           Commission File Number:
  September 30, 1996                                    2-96976-D

DCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.  (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in
                             its charter)

        COLORADO                                     84-1155041
(State or other jurisdiction             (IRS Employer Identification
of incorporation or organization)         Number)


           303 Linwood Avenue, Fairfield, Connecticut  06430
         (Address and zip code of principal executive offices)


  (203) 259-7713 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required by Regulation SB of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the
filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.

                     YES__X__              NO_____

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer/s
classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:

                                        Number of Shares Outstanding
      Class                                  November 5, 1996

Common Stock, $.0001 par value                  4,396,948

                                   
<PAGE>

                     DCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                               Exhibit Index


              Exhibit 27              Financial Data Schedule

                               

<PAGE>

                              SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                   DCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                   (Registrant)



Dated: December 12, 1996          By: Joseph J. Murphy
                                    Joseph J. Murphy
                                    President

                                  By: Larry Shatsoff
                                      Larry Shatsoff
                                      Acting Secretary

                                  12
Order entered October 12, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00681
- CV RAUL NANEZ RAMIREZ, Appellant

V. EZRA CLIFTON WELCH, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 01851



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS appellant’s October 10, 2016 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.
We ORDER appellant to file the brief within THIRTY DAYS from the da te of this
order.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 192

[Docket No. PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854; Amdt. 192-113]
RIN 2137-AE15


Pipeline Safety: Integrity Management Program for Gas 
Distribution Pipelines; Correction

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 
DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal 
Register on December 4, 2009. That final rule amended the Federal 
Pipeline Safety Regulations to require operators of gas distribution 
pipelines to develop and implement integrity management programs. In 
addition to a minor correction in terminology, this document corrects 
an erroneous effective date given in the December 4 publication.

DATES: The effective date for the final rule published December 4, 2009 
(74 FR 63906), is correctly revised from February 2, 2010, to February 
12, 2010. The correction to Sec.  192.383 is effective February 12, 
2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Israni by phone at (202) 366-4571 
or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#682501030d46211b1a090601280c071c460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eaa783818fc4a399988b8483aa8e859ec48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. E9-28467 appearing on page 63906 
in the Federal Register of Friday, December 4, 2009 the following 
corrections are made:

0
1. On page 63906, in the first column, the effective date is corrected 
to read ``Effective Date: This Final Rule takes effect on February 12, 
2010.''


Sec.  192.383  [Corrected]

0
2. On page 63934, in the first column, in Sec.  192.383:
0
a. In paragraph (a), ``natural gas'' is corrected to read ``gas'' in 
both places it appears; and
0
b. In paragraph (b), ``February 2, 2010'' is corrected to read 
``February 12, 2010.''

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 28, 2010.
Cynthia L. Quarterman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-2186 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### GERALD J. RYANS v. EDWARD LOWELL.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul A. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: April 5, 2017    
|                       
|/s/ Paul A. Schmidt    
|Paul A. Schmidt        
|Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofLancer Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher D. Hughes, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 12, 2004 | /s/ CHRISTOPHER D. HUGHES |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                 | Christopher D. Hughes,    |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Pure Resources, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No's.
333-48346, 333-34970, 333-37868 and 333-37870 on Form S-8 of Pure Resources,
Inc. of our report dated April 4, 2001, relating to the statements of  revenue
and direct operating expenses of the oil and gas properties acquired by Pure
Resources, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, which
report is included herein.



                                              KPMG LLP

Midland, Texas
April 13, 2001
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HECTOR RIVERA.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.