alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C.  20549

               FORM 10-QSB -- QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT
                (Added by 34-30968, eff. 8/13/93 as amended)

(Mark One)

[  x  ]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES 
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

[     ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to

Commission file number 0-17032

                           PROTEIN DATABASES, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

    DELAWARE                                        13-3186604
-------------------------------                    --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                    (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization                       Identification No.)

405 OAKWOOD ROAD, HUNTINGTON STATION, NEW YORK      11746
----------------------------------------------     --------------------------
 (Address of principle executive offices)          (Zip Code)

  (516)-673-3939
-------------------------
Issuer's telephone number

_______________________________________________________________________
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
                             last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by 
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months
 (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports) , and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements 
for the past 90 days.  Yes    No.
                        x
                       ---   ---

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issue's classes
of common equity, as fo the latest practicable date.

          Class                            Outstanding at September 30, 1996
----------------------------               ---------------------------------
Common Stock $.01 par value                             1,459,724

<PAGE>

  PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports of Form 8-K

    ( a )  Exhibits: EX-27
  
    ( b )  Reports on Form 8-K: There were no reports on Form 8-K
           filed by the Company during the three months ended
           September 30, 1996    
<PAGE>

          INDEX TO EXHIBITS

27  - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE 


    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE     EXHIBIT 27
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                         PETROLEUM CONSULTANT'S CONSENT
                         ------------------------------

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of Devon Energy Corporation, the reference to our appraisal report for
Devon Energy Corporation as of December 31, 1999, which appears in the December
31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Devon Energy Corporation.

     We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in
the Registration Statement.


     PADDOCK LINDSTROM & ASSOCIATES LTD.
     October 12, 2000
#### STATE v. BERRY

No. 298P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 187

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 July 2001.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Tanzanian RoyaltyExploration Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form20-F for the year ended August 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

(1) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 29, 2018

 

 

/s/ James E. Sinclair

James E. Sinclair,

Executive Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

/s/ Marco Guidi

Marco Guidi,

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending January 3, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Peter A. Edison, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and I, Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President - Finance, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:   March 21, 2005                 /s/ Peter A. Edison
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Peter A. Edison
                                       Chairman of the Board and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.


Date:   March 21, 2005                 /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.
                                       Chief Financial Officer, Vice President -
                                       Finance, Treasurer and Secretary
                                       Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.




         A signed original of this written statement or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bakers Footwear
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1



Contacts:  Daniel J. Thomas               Thomas E. Kiraly
           President and                  Executive Vice President and
           Chief Executive Officer        Chief Financial Officer
           (617) 367-2163                 (617) 619-5101


                        CONCENTRA OPERATING CORPORATION
                     CLOSES EXCHANGE OFFER FOR $190,000,000
                13% SERIES A SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2009


     BOSTON, Mass. (March 16, 2000) - Concentra Operating Corporation
("Concentra") today announced that it has closed its offer to exchange the
outstanding, unregistered 13% senior subordinated notes of Concentra for new,
substantially identical 13% senior subordinated notes that will be free of the
transfer restrictions that apply to the old notes.  Concentra accepted
$175,000,000 in principal amount of old notes tendered for exchange.

     Concentra Operating Corporation is the successor to and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Concentra Managed Care, Inc.  Concentra is the leading provider
and comprehensive outsource solution for cost containment and fully integrated
care management in the occupational, auto, and group healthcare markets.
Concentra offers prospective and retrospective services to employers and
insurers of all sizes, providing pre-employment testing, loss prevention
services, first report of loss, injury care, specialist networks and specialized
cost containment to the disability and automobile injury markets.  Currently,
the Company operates the nation's largest network of occupational healthcare
facilities, with 210 centers located in 63 markets in 32 states. The Company has
approximately 1,050 field case managers who provide medical management and
return to work services in 49 states, the District of Columbia, and Canada.  The
Company also has 86 service locations that provide specialized cost containment
services including utilization management, telephonic case management, first
notice of loss reporting, and retrospective bill review.


                                     -END-
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2197 

AN ACT 

To repeal certain requirements regarding newspaper 

advertising of Senate stationery contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2197 ES

1 SECTION 1. SENATE STATIONERY PROCEDURES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 65, 66, 67, and 68 of 

3 the Revised Statutes (2 U.S.C. 6569, 6570, 6571) are re4 pealed. 

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The fifth para6 graph after the paragraph under the side heading ‘‘FOR

7 CONTINGENT EXPENSES, NAMELY:’’ under the subheading 

8 ‘‘SENATE.’’ under the heading ‘‘LEGISLATIVE.’’ of the 

9 Act of March 3, 1887 (24 Stat. 596, chapter 392; 2 

10 U.S.C. 6572), is amended by striking ‘‘sections, sixty-five, 

11 sixty six, sixty-seven, sixty-eight, and sixty-nine,’’ and in12 serting ‘‘section 69’’. 

Passed the Senate May 8, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2197 

AN ACT 

To repeal certain requirements regarding newspaper advertising of Senate stationery contracts.
#### ANTHONY TAMBURRO AND ELISA TAMBURRO v. RAYMOND HAYDUCKA AND RUTH HAYDUCKA, HUSBAND AND WIFE.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ANGELICA BUDANKOV v. CARL S. AMATO.

January 2, 1985.

This matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed. (See 97 *N.J.*657)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SECOND QUARTER 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,939,503
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,818,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      8,464,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,708,468)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,818,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               148,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             446,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (407,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (407,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (407,739)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (18.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18.47)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTNATS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-25701 and 333-60611) on Form S-8 and registration statement (No. 333-70045)
on Form S-3 of Digital Generation Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 23,
2001, except as to the last two paragraphs of Note 15, which are as of March 23,
2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of StarGuide Digital Networks,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report
appears in the March 26, 2001 current report on Form 8-K/A of Digital Generation
Systems, Inc.



                                        KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 29, 2001
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN H. LEE.

May 7, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 244 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 53
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 244

                          [Report No. 113-22]

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project 
       offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             April 22, 2013

                Reported by Mr. Wyden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project 
       offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PILOT PROJECT OFFICES OF FEDERAL PERMIT STREAMLINING PILOT 
              PROJECT.

    Section 365 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15924) is 
amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Pilot Project Offices.--The following Bureau of Land 
Management Offices shall serve as the Pilot Project offices:
            ``(1) Rawlins Field Office, Wyoming.
            ``(2) Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming.
            ``(3) Montana/Dakotas State Office, Montana.
            ``(4) Farmington Field Office, New Mexico.
            ``(5) Carlsbad Field Office, New Mexico.
            ``(6) Grand Junction/Glenwood Springs Field Office, 
        Colorado.
            ``(7) Vernal Field Office, Utah.''.
                                                        Calendar No. 53

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 244

                          [Report No. 113-22]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project 
       offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 22, 2013

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### MONA W. ELLIOT v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP AND SZUCH.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40136 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HARRY GUILLORY, JR., DefendantAppellant.

---------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-25-ALL

----------------------------------------------------------

July 11, 2002 Before JOLLY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harry Guillo ry, Jr., on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guillory has not respo nded to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave t o wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is dismissed from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. S ee 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2.No. 01-40136 -2- MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Bar Docket No. 13335

#### In the Matter of Walter John Badke II, *Respondent.*

(968 P.2d 670)

In a letter dated June 26, 1998, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Walter John Badke II, of Wichita, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 232).

At the time respondent surrendered his license, there was a six-count complaint scheduled for a hearing before a panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys. The complaint contained allegations of not acting within the scope of representation, in violation of MRPC 1.2 (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 273); lack of diligence in handling a matter for clients, in violation of MRPC 1.3 (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 276); lack of communication with clients, in violation of MRPC 1.4 (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 282); and misconduct involving deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of MRPC 8.4(c) (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 366).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of respondent’s license should be accepted and that respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Walter John Badke II be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Walter John Badke II from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to respondent, and that respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 235).

Dated this 1st day of July, 1998.
##### 



EXHIBIT 24.0
 
   The undersigned directors and officers of PFGI Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the
Corporation) which anticipates filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Corporations fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, hereby
constitute and appoint Susan M. Kinsey, David J. Lucido and Linda K. Erkkila, and each of them,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys or attorney of the undersigned, to
sign in the capacities indicated below, said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments and exhibits
thereto, or other documents to be filed with, or submitted to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission pertaining thereto, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and
things whatsoever required and necessary to be done in the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving the acts
of said attorneys, and any of them, and any such substitute.
  /s/ James T. Berry
    
    DirectorJames T. Berry/s/ Jan M. Bone
    
    Director, Vice PresidentJan M. Bone/s/ Linda K. Erkkila
    
    Director, SecretaryLinda K. Erkkila/s/ Dett P. Hunter
    
    DirectorDett P. Hunter/s/ J. Richard Jordan
    
    Director, Vice President and Assistant SecretaryJ. Richard Jordan/s/ Susan M. Kinsey
    
    Director, President (Principal Executive Officer)Susan M. Kinsey/s/ David J. Lucido
    
    Director, Chief
Financial Officers and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)David J. Lucido/s/ J. David Rosenberg
    
    DirectorJ. David Rosenberg/s/ John E. Rubenbauer
    
    DirectorJohn E. Rubenbauer
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M ELINDA GAB R IELLA VALENZUELA, FKA Enrique M e nde z , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. C HARLES L. R

YAN; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 15-15741 D.C . No. 2:15-c v-00158-NVW M HB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Ne il V. W ake , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. M e linda Ga brie lla Va le nz ue la , a

n Ariz ona sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt in he r 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging tha t she wa s se xua lly

a ssa u lte d by prison sta ff. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED N OV 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§ 1291. W e re ve rse and re m and.

The distric t c ourt e rre d in dismissing Va le nz ue la ’ s a c tion be c a use , e ve n in light of he r pre vious la

wsuits, the

a lle gations in Vale nz ue la ’ s c om pla int we re not fa c t ua lly frivolous. Se e De nton v . He rnande z , 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992) (e xpla ining tha

t “ a c ourt m ay

dism iss a c la im a s fa c tua lly

frivolous only if the fa c ts a lle ge d a re c le arly ba s e le ss, a

c ate gory e n c om pa ssing a lle gations tha

t a re fanc iful, fanta stic , a

nd de lusiona l” and a

c om pla int “ m a

y not be dism i sse d

. . . sim p ly be c a use the c o urt finds thepla intiff’ s a lle gations unlike ly ” ). RE V E RSE D and RE M ANDE D.

1 5 - 1 5 7 4 1 2