alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Arne Dunhem, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MobilePro Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

November 19,  2003

/s/  Arne Dunhem
Arne Dunhem
Chief  Executive  Officer
Principal Financial  and Principal Accounting Officer
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 

DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. EXECUTIVE CASH BONUS PLAN 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. EXECUTIVE CASH BONUS PLAN has been adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board’)
of Dorman Products, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), subject to approval of the Company’s shareholders. 

WHEREAS, the Company’s Executive Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company and
subsequently approved by the shareholders of the Company at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9
of the Plan, the Board has approved the amendment set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, subject to approval of the
Company’s shareholders, as follows: 
 1. Amendment. The Plan is hereby amended by replacing the first paragraph under the
heading Performance Measurement under Section 3 with the following: 
 “Performance measures to be used by the Committee shall be chosen from
among the following factors, or any combination of the following, as the Committee deems appropriate: (a) total shareholder return; (b) growth in revenues, sales, market share, gross income, net income, pre-tax income, pre-tax pre-bonus
income, stock price, and/or earnings per share; (c) return on assets, net assets, and/or capital; (d) working capital, free cash flow and/or after tax cash flow; (e) return on shareholders’ equity; (f) economic or
shareholder value added; (g) acquisition of assets, acquisition of companies, creation of new joint ventures; (h) growth in new products; or (i) lower product acquisition costs and/or improvements in costs and/or expenses. The
Committee may select among the performance measures specified above from Plan Year to Plan Year which need not be the same for each Participant in a given year. 

Such performance measures may incorporate, if and only to the extent permitted under Code Section 162(m), provisions so as to eliminate the effects of
(a) non-recurring items generally excluded from earnings per share and earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and by institutional investors or analysts when evaluating the Company’s performance, such as one-time gains from asset
sales, dispute or litigation charges or recoveries, impairment charges, acts of God, and restructuring charges, but including normal provisions for slow moving and obsolete inventory and accounts receivable, (b) any acquisitions, divestitures,
discontinuance of business operations, or restructuring, (c) the cumulative effect of any accounting changes, and (d) any “extraordinary items” as determined under generally accepted accounting principles.” 

2. No Other Changes. Except as set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending August 14, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0215.
    Date Filed: August 13, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 3, 2010.
    Description: Application of National Air Cargo Group, Inc. d/b/a 
National Airlines requesting it's certificate of public convenience and 
necessity is amended to include authority for foreign charter air 
transportation of persons, property and mail.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-21943 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2435 

To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 

any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-oftime arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations relating to overtime pay. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2014 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that any hours worked by Federal firefighters 

under a qualified trade-of-time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations relating to overtime pay. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Firefighter 

5 Flexibility and Fairness Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2435 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A QUALI2 FIED TRADE-OF-TIME ARRANGEMENT. 

3 Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

6 section, any hours worked by a firefighter under a quali7 fied trade-of-time arrangement shall be disregarded for 

8 purposes of any determination relating to eligibility for, 

9 or the amount of, any overtime pay under this section. 

10 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection— 

11 ‘‘(A) the term ‘qualified trade-of-time arrange12 ment’ means an arrangement under which 2 fire13 fighters who are employed by the same agency 

14 agree, solely at the option of the firefighters and 

15 with the approval of the agency employing the fire16 fighters, to substitute for one another during sched17 uled work hours in the performance of work in the 

18 same capacity; and 

19 ‘‘(B) the term ‘firefighter’ means— 

20 ‘‘(i) a firefighter, as defined in section 

21 8331(21); and 

22 ‘‘(ii) a firefighter, as defined in section 

23 8401(14).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# McConnell tankers enable first F-35 European deployment 

              - Published  April 21, 2017
              -                             By Ashley M. Wright                                                          
              - 22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs

**MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, Kan. (AFNS)  --  **
When the F-35A Lightning II deployed to Europe for the first time April 15, it was made possible by the backbone of the aerial refueling fleet, the KC-135 Stratotanker. “The mission of the 22nd Air Refueling Wing is to refuel the fight,” said Col. Albert Miller, the 22nd Air Refueling Wing commander. “This particular flight was a significant milestone of the F-35 program, and demonstrates the U.S. Air Force's global reach, something our total force team at McConnell (AFB) enables every day, making rapid, global mobility a reality.” The F-35 deployed to Europe for the first time from the 388th and 419th Fighter Wings at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. The multi-role fighter is deployed to maximize training opportunities, affirm enduring commitments to NATO allies and deter any actions that destabilize regional security. The KC-135 from McConnell AFB was just a first step in building an air bridge to deploy the Air Force’s newest weapon’s platform for a training exercise with U.S. allies in Europe. Multiple refueling aircraft from four different bases provided more than 400,000 pounds of fuel for the fighters’ flight from the U.S. to Europe. “It was exciting being able to contribute to the mission directly,” said Capt. Ben Hessney, a 349th Air Refueling Squadron aircraft commander for the flight. Hessney added that a large amount of effort went into planning the success of the mission. While this effort was a historic one, Miller stressed the value aerial refueling adds to all joint flying missions. “The tip of the spear is not thrown, but carried by a tanker,” he said. “The might of our Air Force is in our ability to deliver effects anywhere in the world in a matter of hours. It's the KC-135, and soon to be the KC-46 [Pegasus], which allows the United States to carry aid to our allies or deliver kinetic power to our enemies in a short amount of time."

F-35USAFEdeploymenttrainingLightning IIKC-135McConnell AFBRAF LakenheathStratotankerrefuelAMC

#             Related Links        

-  F-35A Lightning II joint strike fighter aircraft arrive in EuropeApril 16, 2017                                    Combat-ready F-35A Lightning II multi-role fighter aircraft arrived April 15, 2017, at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, demonstrating U.S. commitment to NATO allies and European territorial integrity.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Security and Exchange Act of 1934; Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Donald W. Prosser, Director, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of VCG Holding Corp. (the “Company”), certify, that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VCG Holding Corp.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I haveindicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: April 14, 2004
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 30, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00937-CR

RAYMOND FIELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1310214

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to arson. In accordance with the terms of a plea 

bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on July 11, 2012, to 

confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice. No motion for new trial was filed. On July 24, 2012, appellant filed a 

pro se notice of appeal.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which 

the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of 
2

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the 

record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s 

certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

On September 6, 2012, a written request to withdraw the notice of appeal, 

personally signed by appellant, was filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. This 

court granted the request, and on September 18, 2012, this court issued a memorandum 

opinion dismissing the appeal. See Field v. State, No. 14-12-00712-CR (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 18, 2012, no pet.) (not designated for publication). 

On October 1, 2012, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in the trial court in an 

attempt to appeal the same judgment of conviction. The new appeal was assigned to this 

court. In his notice of appeal, appellant states that the trial court granted permission to 

appeal. The judgment recites, however, that no permission to appeal was granted. In 

addition, the trial court certified that appellant has no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(a)(2).

The notice of appeal filed October 1, 2012, is untimely to appeal from the July 11, 

2012, judgment and sentence. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which 

complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with 

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is 

not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits 

of the appeal, and under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss 

the appeal. Id.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: May 5Published May 5, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, female Airmen have 12 months after childbirth to decide if they will separate from service, Course 15 is replaced by a new NCO distance learning course, and the Air Force sponsors a cyber security hacking contest. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller. 
For previous episodes, click here.
Related stories:
- Female Airmen gain time to make separation decision when pregnant
- Do you have what it takes to ‘Hack the Air Force’?PME 



education 



phishing 



hacking 



distance learning 



Course 15 



contest 



childbirth 



pregnant 



ATAF
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated March 16, 2010, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 24, 2010, (75 FR 14189), Archimica, Inc., 2460 W. Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807-1229, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Amphetamine (1100), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to acquire the listed controlled substance in bulk from a domestic source in order to manufacture other controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Archimica, Inc., to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Archimica, Inc., to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: August 13, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-21780 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDDIE GUADALUPE.

February 26, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.