alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-in-Error, v. Jesse HAAG and Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Treasurer of the State of Tennessee, etc., Defendants-in-Error.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

Feb. 20, 1973.

Wheeler A. Rosenbalm, Knoxville, for plaintiff in error.

O. D. Bridges, Jefferson City, David M. Pack, Atty. Gen., State of Tennessee, C. Hayes Cooney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for defendant in error.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which the sole issue is whether or not the defendant-in-error Haag, who is admittedly, at this time, totally and permanently disabled, is in this condition as the result of an accidental injury which aggravated a preexisting condition or as the result of a progressive degeneration of his back from causes not related to an accident. Ignoring the medical evidence on this issue the trial court held on the basis of the testimony of the defendant-in-error Haag and lay witnesses that Haag had, by his accident, aggravated his preexisting injury, and had been totally and permanently disabled thereby. The medical evidence was not evaluated by the trial judge, and no consideration was given to it in arriving at the judgment.

Since it is the settled rule that, although lay testimony, including that of the claimant, is of probative value in compensation proceedings, as to the existence of pain, capacity to work, etc., Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Treadwell, 212 Tenn. 1, 367 S.W.2d 470 (1963), it is the settled rule that the question whether or not an industrial accident aggravated an employee’s previously existing condition to the point of producing a permanent disability is a complicated medical question carrying the finder of fact into a realm properly within the province of medical experts. Tibbals Floor Co. v. Stanfill, 219 Tenn. 498, 410 S.W.2d 892, and cases cited therein.

Being of opinion the Haag suit should not be dismissed under this rule just *85mentioned, but, that the medical evidence should be evaluated to determine this issue, and being of the further opinion that this is an issue which must first be decided by the trial court, the evidence thereon not presenting simply a question of law as to its sufficiency, the case is remanded to the trial court with the hope and expectation that the medical evidence, together with that of the defendant-in-error and his lay witnesses will be fairly and lawfully weighed and examined, both with respect to its admissibility and probative value, and judgment entered accordingly.

The case is remanded for further consideration in accordance with this Memorandum.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventures-National Incorporation d/b/a Titan General Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Guimond, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ventures-National Incorporation and will be retained by Ventures-National Incorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/ Daniel GuimondDate: January 14, 2005Daniel GuimondChief Financial OfficerVentures-National Incorporated
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 60156 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ADAN REYES

- MARTINEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 143

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Adan Reyes

- Martinez pleaded guilty to failure to depart the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a)(1), and he was sentenced above the advisory guidelines range to 48 months of imprisonment. Reyes

- Martinez waived his right to appeal , but he reserved the right to appeal a claim of in effective assistance of counsel

. On appeal, Reyes

- Martinez argues that his above

- guidelines sentence was

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-60156 Document: 00515148117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2019No. 19

- 60156

2 substantively unreasonable. In lieu of filing a brief, t he Government filed a motion for summary dismissal, seeking enforcement of the appeal waiver

. A defendant may waive the statutory right to appeal in a valid plea agreement

. United States v. McKinney , 406 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 2005 ). “This court reviews de novo whether an appeal waiver bars an appeal.” United States v. Keele , 755 F.3d 752, 75 4 (5th Cir. 2014). In so doing , “we conduct a two

- step inquiry: (1) whether the waiver was knowing and voluntary and (2) whether the waiver applies to the circumstances at hand, based on the pl ain language of the agreement.” United States v. Bond , 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005) . In thi s case, the record demonstrates that Reyes

- Martinez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal, and the appellate waiver applies in this circumstance. See McKinney , 406 F.3d at 746; United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994) ; Un ited States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 567

- 68 (5th Cir. 1992)

. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary dismissal is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. Case: 19-60156 Document: 00515148117 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/07/2019
#### GEORGE CRAWFORD v. B & F AUTO, INC.

March 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00441-CV

Abel R. VASQUEZ and Amelia M. Vasquez,

Appellants

v.

Jesus 

Jesus E. ZAMARIPPA and Yolanda P. Zamarippa,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-09427

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Jesus Zamarippa, recover his costs of this appeal 

from appellant, Abel R. Vasquez.

SIGNED July 31, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          6346
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 129060
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   159855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1152640
<PP&E>                                       1601725
<DEPRECIATION>                               1448844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1551414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          57095
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                        3350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1551414
<SALES>                                       140315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              141998
<CGS>                                         164327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 264478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (122480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (122480)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEROY NAPPER.

March 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western 2

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3285

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Troy L. Gill, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 12, 1999

Filed: February 1, 1999 

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, MURPHY, Circuit Judge, and ALSOP, District

1

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Troy L. Gill, convicted after trial by jury of bank robbery and a related firearm

offense, appeals the denial by the District Court of his motion for a judgment of 2
-2-

acquittal. His appeal thus challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support he

jury's verdict.

Having carefully reviewed the case, we are satisfied the evidence is sufficient

to support the jury's verdict on each of the two counts of conviction. The District

Court therefore did not err in denying Gill's motion for a judgment of acquittal.

By means of a pro se supplemental brief, Gill has attempted to raise a Singleton

"bribery" issue. Because that issue was not raised in the District Court, it is not

properly before us, and we do not address it.

The judgment of conviction entered on the jury's verdict is affirmed. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2018 (the "Report") of Garrison Capital Inc. (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |   |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

 

 

|                         |        |
|-------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Daniel Hahn         |   |
| Daniel Hahn             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 5, 2019           |   |
News United States Air Force
 Spark Tank competition announcedPublished Sept. 21, 2017
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **NATIONAL HARBOR (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson kicked off the Air Force’s Spark Tank competition during the Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference Sept. 18, 2017.
The competition calls for Airmen to pitch their innovative ideas to the Air Force’s senior leaders through the Airmen Powered by Innovation portal and culminates in a showcase of those ideas in Orlando, Fla. early next year at the Air Force Association Air Warfare Symposium.
“Airmen will be able to compete and pitch their ideas to increase the lethality of the force, and to reduce the cost of bringing power to the fight,” Wilson said.
The Spark Tank competition, which is co-hosted between the API program and the newly-announced AFwerX innovation ecosystem, will be conducted in a multi-step approach starting with participants submitting their idea through the API website. Each major command will select two innovative ideas from within their commands to compete at the headquarters level. 
Enlisted, officer and government employees will be eligible to compete in the Spark Tank competition. Additional submission details will be released soon.Secretary of the Air Force 



SecAF 



Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson 



Heather Wilson 



Spark Tank 



Air Force Association 



AFA 



Air Space and Cyberspace conference 



Airmen 



Senior Leaders 



Air Force 



AF 



National Harbor
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

ESTATE OF ELAINE MURRAY 

PETITION OF: BRUCE MURRAY 

:

:

:

:

No. 73 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CEVA, Inc. (the “Company”) for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Chester J.
Silvestri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christine Russell, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, that, to the best of
his or her knowledge:



(1)

The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This
certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.



Date: April
26, 2005

/s/CHESTERJ.
      SILVESTRIChester
      J. SilvestriChief Executive Officer/s/CHRISTINERUSSELLChristine
      RussellChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,636
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             240
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    170,032
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,296
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,478
<LOANS>                                        242,548
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 456,798
<DEPOSITS>                                     264,573
<SHORT-TERM>                                    35,094
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,593
<LONG-TERM>                                    123,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 456,798
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,291
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,536
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    20
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,847
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,593
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      205
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  74
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,074
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,074
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.85
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,342
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,243
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      113
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,337
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,337
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 AF pilot selected for NASA astronaut trainingPublished June 7, 2017
                        
                        
                        412th Test Wing Public Affairs
                **EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                Lt. Col. Raja Chari has been selected by NASA to join the 2017 Astronaut Candidate Class.
Chari relinquishes command of the 461st Flight Test Squadron June 9 where he oversaw developmental testing of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter for the past couple of years. Simultaneously, he served as director of the F-35 Integrated Test Force.
Chari will leave Edwards AFB as a colonel select. He has flown more than 2,000 flight hours in the F-35 Lightning II, F-15 Strike Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, and F-18 Hornet including F-15E combat missions in Operation Iraqi Freedom and deployments in support of the Korean peninsula.
The Iowa native graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1999 with a bachelor’s degrees in astronautical engineering and engineering science. He continued on to earn a master’s degree in aeronautics and astronautics from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and graduated from the U.S. Naval Test Pilot School.
Chari is one of 12 new astronauts introduced on Wednesday who will train for missions into Earth’s orbit and into deep space.
The seven men and five women comprise the 22nd class of American spaceflight trainees since 1959. According to a NASA release, the group is the largest NASA has selected in almost two decades.
The 12 new candidates include six military officers, three scientists, two medical doctors, a lead engineer at SpaceX and a NASA research pilot.
Chari will report for duty in August to begin two years of training as an astronaut candidate. Upon completion, he will be assigned technical duties in the Astronaut Office while he awaits a flight assignment, according to NASA.F-35 



f-16 



training 



U.S. Air Force Academy 



NASA 



astronaut 



F-15 



F-18 



Operation Iraqi Freedom 



461st Flight Test Squadron 



spaceflight 



Edwards AFB
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**ALTERA CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Altera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, John P. Daane, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated. 

Date: April 27, 2009 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained byAltera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1081
<SECURITIES>                                        44
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6281
<PP&E>                                           12954
<DEPRECIATION>                                     787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7163
<BONDS>                                           1567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1302
<PREFERRED>                                        305
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                        8110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18448
<SALES>                                           3254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3254
<CGS>                                             2082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    160
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>