alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000333

15-JAN-2014

08:50 AM
#### PEARSON v. C.P. BUCKNER STEEL ERECTION

No. 452P97-2

Case below: 139 N.C. App. 394

Petition by intervenor (Cary Health Care Center, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 2001.
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**













The
      Board
      of Directors




Asia
      Global Holdings Corp.:




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 of Asia Global Holdings Corp. of our report dated April 19, 2006, except
      for
      Notes 1, 2, and 11, which are dated as of February 6, 2007, relating to the
      consolidated financial statements of Asia Global Holdings Corp. (formerly known
      as BonusAmerica Worldwide Corp.) and subsidiaries for the year ended December
      31, 2005, which report appears in the annual report to stockholders and
      incorporated in this annual report on Form 10-KSB.






/s/
      Clancy and Co., P.L.L.C.




Scottsdale,
      Arizona




April
      16,
      2007
Exhibit 23.3

LOGO

1 HOUSTON CENTER

1221 MCKINNEY, SUITE 3700

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77010





PHONE
(713) 209-1100        FAX (713) 752-0828

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM
CONSULTANTS

Huddleston & Co., Inc. does hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No.
333-124544) of Dorchester Minerals, L.P. of our estimates of reserves, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to all references to our firm included in this Annual Report.



HUDDLESTON & CO., INC./s/ Gregory S. Floyd, P.E.By:

Gregory S. Floyd, P.E.Vice President


Houston, Texas

February 26, 2008
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 244 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project offices 

of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the 

Pilot Project offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining 

Pilot Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PILOT PROJECT OFFICES OF FEDERAL PERMIT 

4 STREAMLINING PILOT PROJECT. 

5 Section 365 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

6 U.S.C. 15924) is amended by striking subsection (d) and 

7 inserting the following: 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 244 IS

1 ‘‘(d) PILOT PROJECT OFFICES.—The following Bu2 reau of Land Management Offices shall serve as the Pilot 

3 Project offices: 

4 ‘‘(1) Rawlins Field Office, Wyoming. 

5 ‘‘(2) Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming. 

6 ‘‘(3) Montana/Dakotas State Office, Montana. 

7 ‘‘(4) Farmington Field Office, New Mexico. 

8 ‘‘(5) Carlsbad Field Office, New Mexico. 

9 ‘‘(6) Grand Junction/Glenwood Springs Field 

10 Office, Colorado. 

11 ‘‘(7) Vernal Field Office, Utah.’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Kirk Blosch, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of OCIS Corp.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: March 29, 2005

By:/s/
   --------------------------------
   Kirk Blosch
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[No. 6315.

Decided November 9, 1906.]

#### R. F. Coates *et al., Respondents,*v. C. K. McCoy, *Appellants.**3*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered March 26, 1906.

Affirmed.

*E. A. Yinsonhaler,*for appellant.

*Higgins & Hall,*for respondents.

3

Reported in 87 Pac. 1150.

*698Per Curiam.

This case, being in equity, was tried by the court, who found in favor of the plaintiff, and awarded judgment accordingly.

We have examined the record in detail, and have concluded that the findings of the court are amply justified by the testimony, and that the conclusions of law were justified by the findings. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
#### STATE v. MONTFORD

No. 414P00

Case below: 137 N.C. App. 495

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 20 December 2000.
SCWC

- 1 9

- 0000 439

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

THEO PEDRO, Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 1 9

- 0000 439 ; CASE NO. 2FFC

- 18

- 0000252(4) )

ORDER OF CORRECTION (B y : Eddins , J .)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That the Opi nion of the Court,
filed on June 4, 2021, is corrected as follows:
On page 43, footnote 29, line 1, the word “undivided”

is corrected to read “divided.”

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all
necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this
change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, June 8, 2021.

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Associate Justice Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000439 08-JUN-2021 10:33 AM Dkt. 19 OCOR
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chester J. Silvestri, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CEVA, Inc. (the Company);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 30, 2005

| | /s/CHESTERJ. SILVESTRI 
| | -----------------------
| | Chester J. Silvestri   
| | Chief Executive Officer
#### GORDON’S TRANSPORTS, INC., Respondent, v. BEST TRUCK LINES, INC., Appellant.

No. KCD 26456.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District.

June 2, 1975.

*44Charles W. Hess, Kansas City, for appellant; Linde, Thomson, Van Dyke, Fairchild & Langworthy, Kansas City, of counsel.

William P. Whitaker, Kansas City, for respondent; Reeder, Griffin, Dysart & Taylor, P. C., Kansas City, of counsel.

Before SOMERVILLE, P. J., PRITCH-ARD, C. J., and TURNAGE, J.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by Gordon’s Transports, Inc., a corporation, for interline charges due it against defendant Best Truck Lines, Inc., which charges were incurred while defendant’s charter was forfeited in the state of Kansas. Defendant appeals from the judgment of the circuit court in favor of plaintiff in the amount of one thousand four hundred and forty-three dollars and thirty-three cents ($1,443.33), plus costs.

Defendant Best’s position on this appeal is, *first,*the trial court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of the litigation and to render judgment against a corporation which was nonexistent at the time the interline freight bills were incurred; that the former officer and owner, Isham, acted as statutory trustee under Section 351.525, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., during the period of forfeiture ; and that the corporation was not “recreated retroactively” when its charter was reinstated December 9, 1969; and *second,*neither the nonexistent corporation nor anyone acting in its place assumed the debts created by the former officer and owner, Isham, for interline service used by him.

These precise issues were decided adversely to defendant in Riley v. Best Truck Lines, Inc., 510 S.W.2d 229 (Mo.App.1974) (suit to recover insurance premiums); and Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. Best Truck Lines, Inc., 518 S.W.2d 469 (Mo.App.1974).

No error of law appears, and therefore the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. An extended opinion in this cause would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.
News United States Air Force
 AF selects Holloman AFB as preferred location for interim F-16 training squadronsPublished Nov. 17, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force selected Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, as the preferred alternative for the interim home for two F-16 Fighting Falcon training squadrons created to increase fighter pilot production as the service faces a growing pilot shortage.Holloman AFB was selected as the preferred location because site survey analysis concluded it has the capacity and existing command structure to begin producing pilots faster than other proposed locations.  Kelly Field in Texas will also be analyzed as a reasonable alternative.The two training squadrons will allow the service to increase fighter pilot production as part of an effort to address a critical fighter pilot shortage. As the Air Force increases undergraduate pilot training, corresponding increases need to be made to flying training units.  These new flying training units will be used to absorb new pilots for continued training.Driven by the urgent need for additional fighter pilot production and the time it will take to establish permanent FTUs, the Air Force announced plans to stand up an interim FTU in August.Pending a positive Environmental Impact Analysis Process for the interim action, the Air Force will relocate 45 F-16s from Hill AFB, Utah, to Holloman AFB while augmenting Holloman’s current manning with additional instructor pilots and contractor logistics support maintainers.The F-16s are expected to arrive at Holloman AFB in the summer of 2017, after the Environmental Impact Analysis Process is complete.Holloman AFB is expected to serve as the interim home while the Air Force continues its strategic basing process to determine the location of the enduring Formal Training Unit.As part of that effort, the Air Force continues to evaluate 34 installations to determine candidate bases for the permanent location.  The installations being evaluated for the permanent location have an existing fighter mission, a runway that is greater than or equal to 8,000 feet, and are located in the continental United States.The basing criteria for the permanent solution include mission requirements (weather, airspace and training range availability), capacity (sufficient hanger and ramp space, and facility considerations), environmental requirements, and cost factors.The Air Force plans to identify candidate installations for the permanent location early next year and will use its Environmental Impact Analysis Process to analyze reasonable alternatives.“The Air Force is committed to a deliberate and open process to address relocating the F-16s,” said Jennifer A. Miller, the deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations. “As we progress through the basing process, we will share information so interested communities are aware of what to expect.”Holloman AFB 



f-16 



pilot 



Kelly Field
Exhibit 8.1

















LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES





|Name of Subsidiary                                                   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Percentage &Type of Securities Owned or Controlled by Company
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Voting Securities Held                                               | Non-Voting Securities        
|Itetemia Mining Company Limited                                      | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 90%  (1)
common shares                                       
|Lunguya Mining Company Ltd.                                          | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 60% (2)
common shares                                        
|Tancan Mining Company Limited                                        | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 100% 
common shares                                          
|Tanzania American International Development Corporation 2000 Limited | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 100% 
common shares                                          
|Buckreef Gold Company Limited (BGCL)                                 | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 55% (3)
common shares                                        
|Northwest Basemetals Company Limited                                 | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 75% (4)
common shares                                        
|BGCL/AGC Joint Venture (6)                                           | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 40% (5)
common shares                                        



| | (1) | The remaining 10% interest is held by State Mining Corporation.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The remaining 40% interest is held by Northern Mining and Consultancy Company Ltd.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | The remaining 45% interest is held by State Mining Corporation.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

| | (4) | The remaining interest is held 15% by State Mining Corporation and 10% by Songshan.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (5) | The remaining interest is held 60% by Allied Gold Corp. of United Arab Emirates.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (6) | Joint venture letter of intent signed and subject to final approval.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Services 
Subcommittee of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), 
September 13, 2010, 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., National Institute of Mental 
Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Conference Room 
A1/A2, Rockville, MD 20852, which was published in the Federal Register 
on August 19, 2010, 75 FR 51276.
    The meeting will not be Webcast as originally advertised. The 
meeting is open to the public and will still be accessible through a 
conference call phone number. The meeting will be held in the same 
place and same time.

    Dated: August 25, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-21817 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Dec. 23Published Dec. 23, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --** On this look around the Air Force Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James speaks on the Air Force’s role in transatlantic security at the Atlantic Council Conference in Washington D.C.; and the North American Aerospace Defense Command helps spread holiday cheer by tracking Santa’s journey across the globe. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller.
For previous episodes, click here.	Related links:- Band kicks off holiday season with 4th annual flash mobNORAD 



SecAF 



James 



Trans 



Atlantic 



security 



training 



calendar 



equipment 



ammunition 



infastructure 



Aircraft 



assets 



PARTNER CAPACITY 



Deploy 



air 



dominance 



F-22 



Romania 



spring 



F-15 



Florida National Guard 



Europe 



F-35 



Santa 



satellite 



track santa 



follow santa 



Norad Santa
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1925-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1925-DR), dated July 23, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 19, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Terry L. Quarles, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Douglas G. Mayne as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-21901 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### STATE v. MOSS

No. 343P00

Case below: 139 N.C. App. 106

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.