alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, September 2, 2010 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 2, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: August 26, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-21798 Filed 8-27-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

I N RE

JOHN RAMON OGAZ

,

Relator. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00 308

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator John Ramon Ogaz, pro se, is seeking a writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Laura Strathmann, judge of the 388th District Court. Relator alleges that Judge Strathmann

improperly transferred his declaratory judgment action to Probate Court No. 2. The petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to

compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by

appeal. In re Reece , 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011) (orig. proceeding). The burden is on the

relator to show he is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company , 165 S.W.3d

315, 317 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we

conclude that Relator has failed to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we2

deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 1

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

January 23, 2020

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

1 All pending motions are denied as moot.
#### MARGARET A. BRADLEY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEACHERS’ PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Cor bin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

d0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

143950

- 1(82)

IGOR BERGER, a/k/a GERALD BERGER,

Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 143950

- 1

COA: 291663, 293880

Wayne CC: 07

- 707413

- CZ

ALLA KATZ and PAUL KATZ,

Defendants/Counter

- Plaintiffs

- Appellants.

_________ ________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 26,

2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS
OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      3,103,247
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 896,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                    6,200
<INVENTORY>                                 2,968,380
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            7,754,268
<PP&E>                                     13,056,437
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,026,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             17,786,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3,979,797
<BONDS>                                     5,433,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    9,179,764
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,216,588)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               17,786,607
<SALES>                                    24,271,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           24,271,319
<CGS>                                       4,423,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,423,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           17,732,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            240,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,875,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                  730,162 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,145,252 
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,145,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .11
        




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fast Eddie Racing Stables,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 1998 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A. Little,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 4, 2004                            By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                               ----------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc. and will be retained by Fast Eddie
Racing Stables, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HENRY DAVIS.

January 28, 1986.

Leave to appeal granted.
#### IN THE MATTER OF FRANK BASTO, ET AL.

January 28, 1986.

Leave to appeal granted. (See 205 *N.J.Super.*233)
Exhibit 31.1

The undersigned, in his capacity as the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Online
Consortium Corp rovides the following certifications required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and 17 C.F.R
240.13a-14.

Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer:

I, D. Grant Macdonald, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Online Consortium Corp,
certify that:

|1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB
    of Online Consortium Corp.;         2.   
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
    material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
    respect to the period covered by this annual report; and
    3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
    financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
    for, the periods presented in this annual report.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Date: November __, 2003

|/s/ D. Grant MacdonaldD. Grant Macdonald
    Chief Executive and Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.9

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors of Novadaq Technologies Inc. 

We consent to the use of: 

 

| • |   | our Independent Auditors’ Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 28, 2017 on the consolidated financial statements of Novadaq Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and |
|---------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| • |   | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 28, 2017 on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, |
|---------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

each of which is included in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the Registration Statements (No. 333-181836 and No. 333-204136) on Form S-8 of the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants 

March 22, 2017 

Toronto, Canada
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        20848
<SECURITIES>                                 922309
<RECEIVABLES>                                187574
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                  192378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1332118
<PP&E>                                      1580245
<DEPRECIATION>                              1460741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1686536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        180400
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                       3350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1686536
<SALES>                                      203016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             229522
<CGS>                                        143030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                221847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7675
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7675
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .01


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-14168

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JEROME (NMN) ALLEN, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondents-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01623-CEM-DCI

USCA11 Case: 22-14168 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 04/30/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 22-14168

____________________

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Allen, a Florida state prisoner proceeding with counsel, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for lack of jurisdiction as untimely and successive. Instead of 

addressing the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, Allen’s retained counsel argues only the merits and underlying constitutional claims in his case, failing to address the jurisdictional issue.1 

Issues not raised on appeal are deemed forfeited. United 

States v. Campbell, 26 F.4th 860, 872–73 (11th Cir. 2022) (en banc). 

An appellant fails to adequately brief a claim when he does not 

“plainly and prominently raise it.” Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Ins. 

Co., 739 F.3d 678, 680–81 (11th Cir. 2014) (quotation marks omitted). Here, Allen has forfeited any claim that the district court 

erred in dismissing his Section 2254 petition as successive, as he 

does not raise any arguments on appeal challenging this determination. See id. 

A barred attorney retained by a prisoner seeking relief from 

a state court judgment is expected to understand and adhere to 

1 Although not required to file a reply brief, Allen’s counsel did not do so despite that being an opportunity to address the specific jurisdictional arguments 

that Florida brought up in its response brief. 

USCA11 Case: 22-14168 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 04/30/2024 Page: 2 of 3
22-14168 Opinion of the Court 3

state2 and federal habeas requirements. This court is troubled by 

the failure of Allen’s counsel to do so. As explained by the district 

court, Allen’s 2019 resentencing was imposed nunc pro tunc, so his 

amended sentence was not a “new judgment” for the purposes of 

Section 2244. See Osbourne v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 968 F.3d 1261, 

1266 (11th Cir. 2020). Accordingly, his 2021 Section 2254 petition 

was successive to his 1998 and 2001 Section 2254 petitions concerning the same judgment. And as Allen’s counsel should know, a petitioner must receive authorization from this court prior to filing a 

successive habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Allen’s 

counsel filed this successive habeas petition without authorization, 

thus requiring the district court to dismiss it. 

AFFIRMED.

2 Allen may have filed a successive motion for postconviction relief in Florida 

state court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(h).

USCA11 Case: 22-14168 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 04/30/2024 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing by CDEX Inc. (the "Company") of its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2010 (the "Report") I, Jeffrey K. Brumfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:


(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer of CDEX Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDEX Inc. and will be retained by CDEX Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/  Jeffrey K. BrumfieldJeffrey K. BrumfieldChief Executive OfficerDate: June 30, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


[PricewaterhouseCooper LOGO]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                     1177 Avenue of the Americas
                                                     New York NY 10036
                                                     Telephone (646) 471 4000
                                                     Facsimile (646) 471 4100


                        Report of Independent Accountants

CIT Financial USA, Inc.


We have examined management's assertion about CIT Financial USA, Inc.'s (the
"Company's"), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc., compliance with the
minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, to the extent
the procedures in such are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in
the Servicing Agreements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, as
included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I) for CIT
Equipment Collateral 2002-VT1. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards, to the extent the procedures in such
are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Servicing
Agreements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, except as noted in
Exhibit I, is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, NY
March 26, 2003