alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 15

November 13, 1995

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that Cyprus Amax Minerals Company has included our report dated 
November 13, 1995, (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing 
Standards Nos. 71 and 42) in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending 
September 30, 1995, which is incorporated in the Prospectuses constituting a 
part of each of the following Registration Statements:

  (a) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-1600, 33-22939 and 33-53792) 
      with respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Savings Plan and Trust.

  (b) Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-1603, 33-21501 and 33-53794) 
      with respect to the Management Incentive Program of Cyprus Amax Minerals 
      Company and its participating subsidiaries.

  (c) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-52812) with respect to the 
      Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.

  (d) Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-36413) with respect to the 
      Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Savings Plan and Trust.

  (e) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-51011) with respect to the 1988
      Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.

  (f) Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-54097), as amended, with 
      respect to Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and Cyprus Amax Finance 
      Corporation.

  (g) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-61141) with respect to the 
      Cyprus Amax Minerals Company Thrift Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees.

We are also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.

Yours very truly,

/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




I,
      Jay O.
      Wright, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of MobilePro Corp. for the quarter ended December 31, 2007
      (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MobilePro Corp.
      for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.





Dated:
                February 11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Jay O. WrightJay
                O. Wright, Chief Executive Officer




I,
      Donald
      L. Paliwoda, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MobilePro Corp. for the quarter ended December
      31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      MobilePro Corp. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.





Dated:
                February 11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Donald L. PaliwodaDonald
                L. Paliwoda, Chief Accounting
                Officer
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 4.5


 



Greenpro, Inc.


9/F., Kam Chung Commercial Building, 19-21 Hennessy Road


Wanchai, Hong Kong


 




	 	May 6, 2014
	 	 





 




VIA EMAIL



Loke Che Chan, Gilbert


 




Re:    Amendment to the Greenpro, Inc. Note


 


Dear Mr. Loke:








Greenpro, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby seeks your consent to make certain amendments to the Promissory Note of the Company in the principal amount of $41,250 originally issued on August 12, 2013 (the “Note”) in the name of Loke Che Chan, Gilbert (“Loke”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.







1.           Amendment to the Note.  This Agreement amends and restates the first paragraph of the Note as follows:








“FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Greenpro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to Loke Che Chan, Gilbert (together with its registered assigns, the “Holder”) on August 12, 2014 (the “Maturity Date”) the principal sum of Forty-one Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty UNITED STATES DOLLARS (U.S.$41,250) (the “Principal”), and to pay to the Holder interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note as provided in Article I hereof. ”







2.           Waiver of Defaults. Loke hereby (i) waives the Defaults as define in Section 5.1 of the Note in connection with the extension of the Maturity Date of the Note, and (ii) to release the Company from the obligations of such Defaults and to waive any claims against the Company in connection with such Defaults or the transactions contemplated hereby.







3.           No Other Changes.  Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, all other provisions of the Note (as amended) shall remain in full force and effect.







4.           Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original agreement, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Execution and delivery of this Agreement by facsimile transmission (including the delivery of documents in Adobe PDF format) shall constitute execution and delivery of this Agreement for all purposes, with the same force and effect as execution and delivery of an original manually signed copy hereof.


 




  





  











  











5.           Governing Law.  This Agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder of each of the parties hereto shall be governed by, and interpreted and determined in accordance with, the law of the State of Nevada without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles.







6.           Conflicts.  To the extent that any term or provision of this Agreement conflicts with any term or provision of the Note, as amended, the term or provision of this Agreement shall control.


 






	 	
Very truly yours,


 



Greenpro, Inc.



	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	
/s/ Lee Chong Kuang

	 
	 	Name:	Lee Chong Kuang	 
	 	Title:	

 
Chief Executive Officer



	 







 



TERMS AGREED TO:




 








	/s/ Loke Che Chan, Gilbert	 
	
Name: Loke Che Chan, Gilbert
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Troy H. Lowrie, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VCG Holding Corp. for
the fiscal period ended December 31, 2004;



2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuers auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuers internal controls.



|                   |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 27, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Troy H. Lowrie      |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | Troy H Lowrie           |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2017 WY 51

 April Term, A.D. 2017

May 10, 2017

KEITH E. MATTERI,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-16-0257

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification 

that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant 

to a plea agreement, Appellant entered unconditional pleas of “nolo contendere” to two 

counts: possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and aggravated assault and 

battery. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(a)(i) and § 6-2-502(a)(i). The district court 

imposed consecutive sentences of 8 to 12 years and 41⁄2 to 6 years. Appellant filed this 

appeal to challenge the district court’s June 20, 2016, “Judgment Upon Pleas of Nolo 

Contendere” and its September 8, 2016, “Sentence.”

[¶2] On March 9, 2017, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a 

“Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 

87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court entered an “Order Granting 

Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief.” This Court ordered that, on or 

before April 24, 2017, Appellant “may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the 

issues he would like this Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided 

notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its 

ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this 

appeal.” The Court notes that Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the 

time allotted.
[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by 

appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be 

granted and the district court’s “Judgment Upon Pleas of Nolo Contendere” and its 

“Sentence” should be affirmed. It is, therefore, 

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel 

for Appellant, Keith E. Matteri, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for 

Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the district court’s June 20, 2016, “Judgment Upon Pleas of Nolo 

Contendere” and its September 8, 2016, “Sentence,” which were entered in district court 

criminal cases 7097 and 7516, be, and the same hereby are, affirmed.

DATED this 10th day of May, 2017.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

E. JAMES BURKE

Chief Justice
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20332 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES RAY LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR H 95-191

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Ray Lewis appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment on double jeopardy grounds. Lewis contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss his indictment because he was prosecuted previously by the State of Texas for the same offense, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. A double jeopardy violation does not occur when a defendant is prosecuted first inNo. 96-20332 - 2 - state court and later in federal court on similar charges. See Heath v. Alabama , 474 U.S. 82, 89 (1985); United States v. Moore , 958 F.2d 646, 650 (5th Cir. 1992). Lewis does not argue that the federal and state governments colluded to prosecute him twice for the same offense. The district court did not err in dismissing Lewis’ motion to dismiss his indictment on double jeopardy grounds.
AFFIRMED.
State of Vermont Superior Court—Environmental Division

=================================================== ======================= E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N

=================================================== =======================
In re Losier Variance Application Docket No. 7 9-4-08 Vtec (Appeal from ZBA decision)

Title: Motion for Writ of Attachment (Filing No. 10 ) Filed: April 6, 2011 Filed By: William P. Neylon, Attorney for Appellee Town of Maidstone Response in Opposition filed on 5/9/11 by Oliver L. Twombly, Attorney for Appellants/Applicants John and Paulette Losier

__ Granted _X_ Denied ___ Other

For the same reasons as those contained in our Ent ry Oder issued today denying the Town of Maidstone’s (“Town”) motion to enforce judgment, we also DENY the Town’s motion seeking a writ of attachment against the real property owned by John and Paulette Losier.

There is no pending matter before the Court in rega rds to which the Town is likely to “recover judgment.” See V.R.C.P. 4.1(b)(2) (authorizing a c ourt to approve a request for a writ of attachment upon finding “that there is a reasonable likelihood that the plaintiff will recover judgment”). Consequent ly, this motion can be DENIED without a hearing.

_________________________________________ August 1, 2011_ _____ Thomas S. Durkin, Judge Date

=================================================== ======================== Date copies sent to: ____________ Clerk's Initials _______ Copies sent to: Oliver L. Twombly, Attorney for Appellants/Appl icants John and Paulette Losier William P. Neylon, Attorney for Appellee Town o f Maidstone
Interested Person Brenda J. Tilton
Interested Person Norman A. Vashaw
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 229 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.229

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the 
 ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
                                Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Act of 
2013''.
SEC. 2. CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
MEDICAL CENTER.
    (a) Designation.--The medical center of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans 
Affairs Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans 
Affairs Medical Center.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LESTER SMALL.

October 3, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

                      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                               November 1, 2000
                               -----------------
                       (Date of Earliest Event Reported)



                              SOLV-EX CORPORATION
                              -------------------
            (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



                                  New Mexico
                                  ----------
                (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)



            0-9897                                 85-0283729
            ------                                 ----------
    (Commission File Number)             (IRS Employer Identification Number)



                2127 Menaul NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico   87107
                -----------------------------------------------
          (Address of principal executive offices including zip code)



                                (505) 883-0331
                                --------------
              (Registrant's telephone number including area code)


                                Not Applicable
                                --------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

Item 5.   Other Items
          -----------

          See press release dated November 2, 2000 attached as an Exhibit.


Item 7.   Financial Statements and Exhibits
          ---------------------------------

(c)  Exhibits

     99.  Press Release dated November 2, 2000 - John S. Rendall Resigns as
          Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of
          Solv-Ex Corporation -Solv-Ex Suspends All Research and Development.

                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                                  SIGNATURES
                                  ----------

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Date:  November 3, 2000                SOLV-EX CORPORATION
                                       (Registrant)



                                       By /s/ Frank Ciotti
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Frank Ciotti
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                      -3-
SUBSIDIARIES OF NEW ENGLAND COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

                                                                      Percent
                                                                     Owned By
                                                                    New England
                                          Incorporated In            Community
Subsidiary                                the State of:            Bancorp, Inc.
----------                                -------------            -------------

New England Bank and Trust Company        Connecticut                    100%

The Equity Bank                           Connecticut                    100%

Community Bank                            Connecticut                    100%

Olde Port Bank and Trust                  New Hampshire                  100%

New England Community Mortgage Corp.      Connecticut                    100%
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of VCG Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W. Prosser, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: April 18, 2005 |  | /s/ Donald W. Prosser                 
|                      |  | Donald W. Prosser                     
|                      |  | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JAMES D. LEWIS, JR. AND JAMES P. 

RYAN, JR.,

Petitioners

v.

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF 

ELECTIONS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 383 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.