alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7143]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Hakimullah Mehsud, also known as Hakeemullah Mehsud, also known as Zulfiqar, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that “prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,” I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: August 12, 2010.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-21852 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1301
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1685
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2986
<PP&E>                                            669
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8392
<BONDS>                                          1150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             275
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            3
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4192)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       6847
<SALES>                                          2327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2327
<CGS>                                            1623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (134)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (97)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (231)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          543689
<SECURITIES>                                   1424716
<RECEIVABLES>                                   472924      
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       2423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2449613
<PP&E>                                         2045762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1217402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3921359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1004987
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          3587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2678026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3921359
<SALES>                                        8481385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8573005
<CGS>                                          5832333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2606749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               28784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 105139
<INCOME-TAX>                                     54473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              50666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     50666
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .014
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .014
        

</TABLE>
The HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-1914

___________

Cedric Tyrone Jackson, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Timothy Sprickler; Unknown Kemp; *

Moline Acres Police Department, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 21, 1997

 Filed: February 27, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Jackson appeals from the district court's order

1

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice. The docket

sheet entries indicate that the district court held a hearing after

which it dismissed Jackson’s complaint. Jackson argues on appeal

that he was treated unfairly at this hearing; however, he has

neither provided nor requested a transcript. We thus cannot

conduct meaningful review of the issues he raises on appeal. See

Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters &

Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam)

(appellant must provide all parts of proceedings below necessary

for reviewing any claimed error; appellate court unable to review
-2-

certain issues raised by appellant in absence of transcript), cert.

denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

 Based upon the record before us, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROSALIE MARTINEZ.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0032 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CARLOS VALENZUELA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee ’ s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including March 30 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 22 2021

01/22/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0032
EXHIBIT 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ResCon Technology
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Christian Nigohossian, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.




Date: August 1, 2003              By: /S/ Christian Nigohossian
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Christian Nigohossian
                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                  Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELINDA GABRIELLA

VALENZUELA, FKA Enrique Mendez,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-15741

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00158-NVWMHB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se

from the district court’s judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that she

was sexually assaulted by prison staff. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

FILED

NOV 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1291. We reverse and remand.

The district court erred in dismissing Valenzuela’s action because, even in

light of her previous lawsuits, the allegations in Valenzuela’s complaint were not

factually frivolous. See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992)

(explaining that “a court may dismiss a claim as factually frivolous only if the facts

alleged are clearly baseless, a category encompassing allegations that are fanciful,

fantastic, and delusional” and a complaint “may not be dismissed . . . simply

because the court finds the plaintiff’s allegations unlikely”).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

2 15-15741
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ernst Neulaender, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 1, 1957.

*604*Werner Galleshi*for Marvin G. Floraran, petitioner.

*Jaffa $ Silverman*for Freedman & Slater, respondent.

*Stull <& Stull*for Louise Jacobson, as executrix of Gunther Jacobson, deceased, and another, respondents.

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

This is an application by the ancillary administrator *e. t. a.*for the consent of the court to the transfer to this court, pursuant to subdivision 9 of section 40 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, of an action pending in the Supreme Court, New York County.

In May, 1956 the representative of this estate instituted a discovery proceeding against Freedman & Slater, Inc. to recover a fund of some $3,000. This same fund has been the subject of much litigation in the Supreme Court and in the Appellate Division, First Department. (See *Jacobson*v. *Freedman & Slater,*275 App. Div. 631, 286 App. Div. 778, N. Y. L. J., Feb. 4, 1957, p. 6, col. 5.) There are several claimants to the fund in the Supreme Court action, none of whom is a party to the discovery proceeding in this court. The Appellate Division in directing a new trial and the Judge in Special Term on a motion for summary judgment have suggested that the representative of this estate be notified of the trial and invited to assert the estate’s claim to the fund, if any, in the action in the Supreme Court. Notwithstanding these suggestions the representative of this estate has not sought to intervene nor has he been made a party to the Supreme Court action.

It would appear that the title to the fund should be disposed of in the Supreme Court action to which the several claimants to the fund are parties. In these circumstances the motion for the consent of this court to the transfer of the action is denied as a matter of law and in the exercise of the court’s discretion.

Submit order on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from MRI Business
Properties Fund, Ltd. III and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>   1

       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                             7,429,000
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             15,421,000
<DEPRECIATION>                     (4,684,000)                   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     18,526,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0
<BONDS>                            7,673,000
<COMMON>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         10,630,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       18,526,000
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   4,341,000<F1>
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      940,000             
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 108,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    3,130,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                3,130,000
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       3,130,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      23.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                      23.74
<FN>
<F1> Total revenues include a gain on sale of property of $2,699,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements File No. 333-50259; File No. 333-94439; File No.
333-89683; File No. 333-35846; and File No. 333-94453.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP

San Antonio, Texas
August 24, 2000
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2431 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2014 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study of the West Hunter Street Baptist 

Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Hunter Street 

5 Baptist Church Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con8 duct a special resource study of the historic West Hunter 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2431 IS

1 Street Baptist Church, located at 775 Martin Luther King 

2 Jr. Drive, SW., Atlanta, Georgia. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub4 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

5 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

6 site; 

7 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

8 designating the area as a unit of the National Park 

9 System; 

10 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

11 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

12 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

13 nonprofit organizations; 

14 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

15 local governmental entities, private and nonprofit or16 ganizations or any other interested individuals; and 

17 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac18 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

19 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

20 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

21 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec22 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5; commonly 

23 known as the ‘‘National Park Service General Authorities 

24 Act’’). 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2431 IS

1 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

2 on which funds are first made available for the study 

3 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

4 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep5 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

6 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

7 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

8 the Secretary. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[No. 6416.

Decided November 22, 1906.]

#### The State of Washington, *on the Relation of Washington Dredging and Improvement Company, Appellant,*v. E. W. Ross, *Commissioner of Public Lands, Respondent,*George Kinnear *et al.,*Interveners.2

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered February 8, 1906.

Affirmed.

*W. F. Hays (Vance £ Mitchell*and *Shepard £ Flett,*of counsel), for appellant.

*The Attorney General*and *Robert F. Booth, Assistant,*for respondent.

*James M. Epler,*for interveners.

2

Reported in 87 Pac. 1151.

Per Curiam.

The record in this case shows that every material proposition involved was decided adversely to appellant’s contention, by this court, in the case of *State v. Washington Dredging etc. Co.,*43 Wash. 508, 86 Pac. 936. An elaborate and able petition for rehearing was filed in that case, which, after due consideration, was denied. Being satisfied with the decision in that case, the judgment in this case will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                   450,405
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             13,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                              60,387
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         470,069
<PP&E>                                                 4,117,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,477,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,593,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    146,975
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,446,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,593,581
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,185,116
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            840,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          713,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      713,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             713,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13

- 23

- 00 243

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

LOUELLA SADLER,

PARTNERS CAPITAL, L.L.C.,

JR ASSETS, L.L.C., RIEHS

BROTHERS L.P., R BROS L.P.,

AND RIEHS CATTLE CO., Appellant s

,

v.

JONATHAN R. RIEHS,

BRENT R. ROZNER,

AND ROBERT BLEVINS, Appellee s

.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Jackson County, Texas.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Long oria

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Contreras2 This cause is before the Court on appellant s’ motion to withdraw appeal which we

construe as a motion to dismiss appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). According to the

motion, after the trial court granted a Third Amended Temporary Injunction, this appeal is

now moot.

The Court, having considered th e documents on file and the motion to dismiss the

appeal, is of the opinion the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed as moot. Costs

are taxed against appellants. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ( “ Absent agreement of the

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant. ” ). Having dismissed the appeal at

the appellant s’ r equest, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

13th day of July, 202 3

.