alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       51
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,222
<PP&E>                                           8,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              941
<BONDS>                                          2,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,857
<SALES>                                          1,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,729
<CGS>                                            1,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    139
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                123
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
<FN>
<F1>
Net of interest income, $20 million, and capitalized interest, $8 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEVIN NEWTON.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Historical Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, this notice announces a meeting of the Department of 
Defense Historical Advisory Committee. The committee will discuss the 
report and recommendations of the Secretary of the Navy's Advisory 
Subcommittee on Naval History. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held on the 15th Floor, Room 2, 1777 
North Kent Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carolyn Thorne at 703-588-7890 or 
Ms. Pamela Bennett at 703-588-7889 for information or upon arrival at 
the building in order to be admitted.

    Dated: October 7, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E8-24482 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELRAY ROGERS, a/k/a Elray Rodgers,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-95-115, CA-98-633-2)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elray Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Elray Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Rogers, Nos. CR-95-115;

CA-98-633-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, NEI Institutional Training Grant Applications II.
    Date: September 1, 2010.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NEI, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Anne E. Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 
9300, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90f1f5e3d0fef5f9befef9f8bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3828690a38d868acd8d8a8bcd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 23, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-21346 Filed 8-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        Banc One Credit Card Master Trust
                    Trust Performance by Series - April 2001
                             Excess Spread Analysis

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------
Series                                     1996-A
Deal Size                                 $500 MM
Expected Maturity                         5/15/03
--------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>

Yield                                      21.27%
Less    Coupon                              5.08%
        Servicing Fee                       1.50%
        Net Credit Losses                   7.91%
Excess Spread:
        April-01                            6.79%
        March-01                            6.71%
        February-01                         6.47%
Three Month Average Excess Spread           6.66%

Delinquency:
        30 to 59 Days                       1.83%
        60 to 89 Days                       1.25%
        90+ Days                            2.52%
        Total                               5.61%

Payment Rate                               13.07%

--------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
#### MICHELLE BRACKEL v. JAMES R. ISAIA.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 206 *N.J.Super.*50)
#### Marshall Field et al v. Ephraim H. Plummer.

*Judgment*— Service *of process*— Error *in name of defendant.*

A man sued by actual service of process, under a name which he is called by and known, may be held upon a j udgment under that name.

Error to Wayne. (Beilly, J.)

Argued Jane 14, 1889.

Decided June *21,*1889.

Debt on judgment. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Julian G. Dickinson,*for appellant.

*Elliott G. Stevenson,*for plaintiffs.

Campbell, J.

Defendant was sued on a judgment rendered against him in Illinois as Edward H. Plummer. His defenses noticed were the statute of limitations, and the non-service of process on him. He also on the trial claimed that he was a surety, ánd that many years ago plaintiffs agreed not to enforce the judgment.

On the trial in the circuit there was proof that defendant had been known for various purposes by the name of Edward, and proof that the writ was actually served on him, as well as some proof of his knowledge and recognition of the judgment.

There was no plea or notice of the defense set up as arising out of suretyship, and it could not come in unless pleaded. \Ve need not, therefore, consider that matter.

There can be no question that a man sued by actual service of process, under a name which he is called by and known, may be held upon a judgment under that name, and this judgment was so identified. . There was a direct conflict *438of testimony whether service was made on him or not, and we cannot disturb the finding of the jury, who were correctly instructed on that point. The defense under the statute of limitations was not made out.

While there are circumstances which might render the long neglect to inforce the judgment suspicious, and perhaps-unjust, we can only deal with it on legal grounds, and find no error in the record.'

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Champlin and Long, JJ., concurred. Sherwood, C. J., and Morse, J., did not sit.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Resource, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mr. Terry
M. Deru, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

DATE: March 22, 2007



By: /s/ Terry Deru
Terry Deru, Chief Executive Officer
#### FRED SCORDO v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INC.

May 17, 1985.

This matter having been duly considered, and the Court having determined that leave to appeal was improvidently granted;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed. (See 99 *N.J.*201)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2435

 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2014

  Mr. Begich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Firefighter Flexibility and 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A QUALIFIED TRADE-OF-TIME 
              ARRANGEMENT.

    Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any 
hours worked by a firefighter under a qualified trade-of-time 
arrangement shall be disregarded for purposes of any determination 
relating to eligibility for, or the amount of, any overtime pay under 
this section.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `qualified trade-of-time arrangement' means 
        an arrangement under which 2 firefighters who are employed by 
        the same agency agree, solely at the option of the firefighters 
        and with the approval of the agency employing the firefighters, 
        to substitute for one another during scheduled work hours in 
        the performance of work in the same capacity; and
            ``(B) the term `firefighter' means--
                    ``(i) a firefighter, as defined in section 
                8331(21); and
                    ``(ii) a firefighter, as defined in section 
                8401(14).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2136 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2136

 To ensure that oil transported through the Keystone XL pipeline into 
the United States is used to reduce United States dependence on Middle 
                              Eastern oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2014

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that oil transported through the Keystone XL pipeline into 
the United States is used to reduce United States dependence on Middle 
                              Eastern oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy 
shall ensure that any crude oil and bitumen transported into the United 
States by the Keystone XL pipeline, and all refined petroleum fuel 
products originating from that crude oil or bitumen, will be entered 
into domestic commerce in the United States for--
            (1) use as a fuel; or
            (2) the manufacture of another product.
    (b) Waivers Authorized.--The President may waive the requirement 
described in subsection (a) if--
            (1) the President determines that a waiver is in the 
        national interest because it--
                    (A) will not lead to an increase in domestic 
                consumption of crude oil or refined petroleum products 
                obtained from countries hostile to United States 
                interests or with political and economic instability 
                that compromises energy supply security;
                    (B) will not lead to higher costs to refiners who 
                purchase the crude oil than the refiners would pay for 
                crude oil in the absence of the waiver; and
                    (C) will not lead to higher gasoline costs to 
                consumers than consumers would pay in the absence of 
                the waiver;
            (2) an exchange of crude oil or refined product provides 
        for no net loss of crude oil or refined product consumed 
        domestically; or
            (3) a waiver is necessary under the Constitution, a law, or 
        an international agreement.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH H. THOMAS.

July 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Order filed, January 28, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00942

- CV

____________ ALOYSIUS HOANG AKA H OANG DUY HUNG , Appellant

V.
THINH DAT NGUYEN, IN DIVIDUAL; THOI BAO HOUSTON AND THOI BAO , Appellee

On Appe al from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 59665



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due January 20, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

rec ord. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen DeShetler , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the dat e of this order

. PER CURIAM
LLS                  LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP
An affiliate of C Bass.

4828 Loop Central Drive                                                                                         Telephone (713) 960 9676

Houston, Texas 77081                                                                                                        Fax (713) 960 0539

 

 

 

March 12, 2003

 

Asset Backed Securities Trust Services  ABFC 2002 SB1

LaSalle Bank National Association

135 South LaSalle Street

Chicago, IL 60603

RE:	ABFC Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2002 SB1

To Whom It May Concern:

The undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during such preceding fiscal year (or such shorter period in the case of the first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement for 2002.

 

 
***Janice McClure

Janice McClure

 Senior Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

355/356***
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF D.B.

May 6, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 239 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 239

       To extend the frontier extended stay clinic demonstration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the frontier extended stay clinic demonstration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE FRONTIER EXTENDED STAY CLINIC 
              DEMONSTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 434 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (42 U.S.C. 1395x note) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``Three-Year 
                Period'' and inserting ``Duration''; and
                    (B) by striking ``3-year period'' and inserting 
                ``6-year period''; and
            (2) in subsection (f), by striking ``the date that is 1 
        year after the date on which the demonstration project 
        concludes'' and inserting ``April 15, 2014''.
    (b) Funding for the Office of Rural Health Policy to Support 
Frontier Extended Stay Clinics.--Out of funds in the treasury not 
otherwise appropriated, there are appropriated to the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2013, 
2014, and 2015, for Rural Health Research/Policy Development within the 
Office of Rural Health Policy to support frontier extended stay 
clinics. Amounts appropriated pursuant to the preceding sentence shall 
remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```