alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.30 Long Term Incentive Plan






Exhibit 10.30




Long Term Incentive Plan


On November 7, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Fortegra Financial Corporation (the “Company”) approved a Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) for the Company’s executive officers.  On January 1, 2013, under the LTIP, the Company shall make a share-based award to each executive officer in an amount equal in value to 37.5% of his or her base salary, or, in the case of the Company’s CEO, 50% of his base salary.  Half the value of the award shall be made in options to purchase Company common stock and half in restricted stock. 


The share-based awards will vest, if at all, if the Company achieves three-year performance goals on or before December 31, 2015 for (i) net revenue (Compound Annual Growth Rate), (ii) earnings growth (Net Income) and (iii) profitable growth (Return on Average Equity).  The performance metrics are equally weighted such that achievement of any one target results in vesting of one-third of the total equity award.


The restricted stock and options will be granted pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Company’s restricted stock and option award agreements, as applicable.  The exercise price of the options will be the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.  The options will expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I,Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                     theAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Jeffrey P. Jacobs |
|   | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:                 | March 18, 2009 |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Hill AFB fighter wings bring first F-35A to Red FlagPublished Jan. 23, 2017
                        
                        
                        388th Fighter Wing
                **HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah (AFNS) --**
                Pilots and maintainers from the 388th and 419th Fighter Wings deployed the F-35A Lightning II to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, Jan. 20, 2017 for exercise Red Flag.This is the first deployment to Red Flag for the F-35A and the first large movement since the Air Force declared the jet combat ready in August 2016.Red Flag is the Air Force's premier air-to-air combat training exercise. Participants include both U.S. and allied nations' combat air forces. The exercise provides aircrews the experience of multiple, intensive air combat sorties in the safety of a training environment.“Our Airmen are excited to bring the F-35 to a full-spectrum combat exercise,” said Col. David Lyons, the 388th FW commander. “This battle space is going to be a great place to leverage our stealth and interoperability. It’s a lethal platform and I’m confident we will prove to be an invaluable asset to the commander.”The jets will be at Red Flag through Feb. 10. While deployed, the F-35 will fly alongside fourth-and-fifth generation platforms and provide offensive and defensive counter air, suppression of enemy air defenses, and limited close air support.“Red Flag is hands-down the best training in the world to ensure our Airmen are fully mission ready,” said Col. David Smith, the 419th FW commander. “It’s as close to combat operations as you can get. Our Reserve pilots and maintainers are looking forward to putting the F-35A weapon system to the test alongside our active duty partners to bring an unprecedented combat capability.”The F-35A is a fifth-generation, multi-role stealth fighter designed to gather, fuse and distribute more information than any other fighter in history.The first operational F-35As arrived at Hill AFB in October 2015. The base will eventually be home to three operational F-35 fighter squadrons with a total of 78 aircraft by the end of 2019. The active duty 388th FW and Air Force Reserve 419th FW will fly and maintain the Air Force’s newest fighter aircraft in a Total Force partnership, which capitalizes on the strength of both components.red flag 



nellis afb 



Hill AFB 



419th FW 



388th FW 



F-35A
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 23,
2000 included in North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation's Form 10 for the
Registration of Securities and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

July 21, 2000
Raleigh, North Carolina
Exhibit 99(c)


                          Certificate as to Compliance
                          ----------------------------


         I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation
(the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 4.10 of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 9, 2001 among
Household Automotive Trust 2001-3, as Issuer, Household Auto Receivables
Corporation, as Seller, the Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota,
National Association, as Indenture Trustee (the "Master Sale and Servicing
Agreement"), that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1
         through December 31, 2002 (the "Year") and of its performance under the
         Master Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
         and

         2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Master
         Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.



                                       /s/ STEVEN H. SMITH
                                       -------------------
                                       Steven H. Smith
                                       Servicing Officer
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James Briscoe, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 26, 2007

 

/s/ James Briscoe 

James Briscoe

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

CW1178355.1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7676

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHE JARON DURBIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-99- 440, CA-01-1808) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Che Jaron Durbin, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Che Jaron Durbin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Durbin , Nos. CR-99-440; CA-01-1808 (D. Md. filed July 31, 2001; entered Aug. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD ROLLIS.

December 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Institutional Properties/3 1997 Second Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768890
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/3
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,389
<SECURITIES>                                       105
<RECEIVABLES>                                      458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          62,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,016)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         30,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,407
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.78<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.2**Section 302 Certification****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan D. Horn, Vice President certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Rogers Cable Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date:*March 8, 2006*                 */s/ Alan D. Horn*       Alan D. Horn      Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

               CONSENT OF WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.

     As independent oil and gas consultants, Williamson Petroleum Consultants,
Inc. hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 to be filed by Pure Resources, Inc. on or about the date
hereof, of all references to our firm included in the proxy statement/prospectus
of Pure Resources, Inc. in its registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-
34970), including under the heading of "Experts" in the proxy
statement/prospectus.

                                          WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.

Midland, Texas
October 17, 2000
#### FAUST v. LONG.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [LLWYD01000-2009-LL13100000-NB0000-LXSI016K0000] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (1976) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Pinedale Anticline Working Group (PAWG) will conduct meetings in Pinedale, Wyoming. These meetings are open to the public. 

# DATES:

The August 26, 2010, September 23, 2010, and October 28, 2010 meetings have been cancelled. The PAWG will meet on the following dates: October 1, 2010, November 4, 2010, February 3, 2011, and May 6, 2011, beginning at 10 a.m. MST. 

# ADDRESSES:

BLM Pinedale Field Office, 1625 West Pine Street, Pinedale, WY. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Shelley Gregory, Bureau of Land Management, Pinedale Field Office, 1625 West Pine Street., P.O. Box 768, Pinedale, WY 82941; 307-367-5328;                         *shelley_gregory@blm.gov.*

      ( print page 53981)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The PAWG was established by the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Record of Decision (ROD) for the Pinedale Anticline Project Area (PAPA) on July 27, 2000 and carried forward with the release of the ROD for the PAPA Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on September 12, 2008. 

The PAWG is a Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) group which develops recommendations and provides advice to the BLM on mitigation, monitoring, and adaptive management issues as oil and gas development in the PAPA proceeds. 

                    Additional information about the PAWG can be found at:                     *www.blm.gov/​wy/​st/​en/​field_​offices/​pinedale/​pawg.html.*

Dated: August 27, 2010. 

Donald A. Simpson, 

State Director .

[FR Doc. 2010-21912 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John M. Carradine, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ John M. CarradineJohn M. Carradine
Chief Financial Officer
December 11, 2002
#### Nicholas NADING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46578.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1973.

Ted L. Potter, Belton, C. Gordon Met-calf, Temple, for appellant.

Stanley Kacir, Joe Carroll, Dist. Attys., R. C. Joe Mikeska, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Belton, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty. and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of robbery by firearms with the punishment being assessed at seven years.

On May 3, 1972, the appellant waived his right to a trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty to the offense before the court.

On appeal his sole contention is that “The trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s application for probation.”

*130Such contention is overruled. It rests within the sound discretion of the trial court as to whether probation should be granted and such decision is not appeala-ble. E. g. Trautschold v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 466 S.W.2d 586.

No motion for rehearing will be filed by the Clerk except by leave of this Court upon a showing of good cause.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Davis, Appellee, *v.*Baltimore *&*Ohio Rd. Co., Appellant.

(Decided November 2, 1938.)

*246*Messrs. Young & Young,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Maple S Maple,*for appellant.

By the Court.

An examination of this record discloses that there is abundant evidence that the appellant, the Baltimore *&*Ohio Railroad Company, failed to perform the statutory duty to maintain a' fence sufficient to turn stock, imposed upon it by Section 8913, General Code of Ohio.

While, by Section 8858, General Code, the appellant was obliged to construct a crossing for the convenience of the abutting landowner, that did not relieve it from the duty of constructing and maintaining a fence sufficient to turn stock. It imposed upon the railroad company the additional duty of providing some means, by gate or otherwise, whereby the farmer could pass through the fence and adequately close the passageway behind him. This it failed to do. The witness testified that “when they built the new fence they took the old boards and made the gate and when that rotted away, I put a wire across the opening.”

There is no evidence in the record that an adequate gate had been furnished or maintained at this crossing where appellee’s horse got onto the appellant’s right of way. This failure to comply with its statutory duty continued to the time of this incident, and was the proximate cause of the appellee’s damage.

This being the situation shown by the record, any technical error that might appear would not be prejudicial.

For these reasons, the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Ross, P. J., Hamilton and Matthews, JJ., concur.