alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Yesterday’s Air Force: Operation SantaPublished Dec. 20, 2017
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – What started as a simple typo, turned into yearly tradition where every year the North American Aerospace Defense Command helps children all over the world track Santa. Track Santa this year at www.noradsanta.org.
Yesterday's Air Force is a history and heritage featurette series profiling significant people and missions from the Air Force's past.NORAD 



Santa tracker 



Peterson AFB 



AFSPC 



history 



Air Force family 



holidays 



Santa Claus
<PAGE>

[LETTERHEAD AND LOGO OF DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS]

                                                                      Exhibit 16

December 11, 2000

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sir/Madam:

We have read the statements made by LML Payment Systems Inc. (the
"Company")(copy attached), which we understand will be filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Item 4 of Form 8-K, as part of
the Registrant's Form 8-K dated December 4, 2000. We agree with the statements
concerning our firm in such Form 8-K. We have no basis to agree or disagree with
the Company's statements regarding Arthur Andersen LLP in the third paragraph of
the company's disclosure.


Yours truly,


/s/  Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton

DALE, MATHESON, CARR-HILTON


AFD:nk


c.c.  British Columbia Securities Commission
      P.O. Box 10142
      Pacific Centre 701
      West Georgia Street
      Vancouver, B.C.
      V7Y 1L2

      Richard Roberts
      Government of Yukon
      Corporate Affairs
      Registrar of Securities
      P.O. Box 2703, J-9
      Whitehorse, Yukon
      Y1A 2CH
STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Health Resource,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Zhou, Yi, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify that:




* the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




* the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




CHINA HEALTH RESOURCE, INC.
                  (Registrant)Date: April
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Zhou, YiZhou,
      Yi
                  Chief
      FinancialOfficer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. McLane, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James W. McLane

James W. McLane
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 4, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard A. SackettRichard A. SackettPresident/s/ David F. WilkinsonDavid F. WilkinsonChief Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: June 18, 2007
Order filed, February 20, 2018.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-17-00915-CV

JORY ODOM AND SECURATECH SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellant

V.

SOUTHCROSS SECURITY, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2015-14026

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 2, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. On January 10, 2018, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within

30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has 

not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal, 

if any, within 30 days of the date of this order. 
No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The 

trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is 

timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If the reporter does not timely file the record 

as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 99.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   
  We hereby consent to (i) the inclusion in Pretium Resources Inc.’s Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (ii) the incorporation by reference in Pretium Resources Inc.’s registration statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-179726) of our Auditor’s Report dated March 6 , 2012 relating to the Pretium Resources Inc.’s Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the period from the date of incorporation on October 22, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
  signed “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”
 Chartered Accountants
  March 14 , 2012
Supreme Court of Texas

═══════════════════════

Misc. Docket No. 22-9080

═══════════════════════

Transfer of Case From the

First Court of Appeals to the 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code § 73.001, the following case is hereby transferred 

from the Court of Appeals for the First District, Houston, Texas, to the Court of 

Appeals for the Fourteenth District, Houston, Texas:

Case No. 01-22-00547-CV

In the Interest of D.L.C., A Child v. Texas Department of Family and Protective 

Services

The First Court of Appeals will make the necessary orders for the transfer of 

the case directed hereby and will cause the Clerk of that Court to transfer or transmit 

all filings in the case, and verify all orders made, to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.

Upon completion of the transfer, the First Court of Appeals shall provide notice of the 

transfer to the Supreme Court and the State Office of Court Administration.

ORDERED by the Supreme Court of Texas, in Chambers,

With the Seal thereof affixed at the City of 

Austin, this 20th day of September, 2022.

_______________________________________

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            1171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5225
<PP&E>                                            4444
<DEPRECIATION>                                     465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3314
<BONDS>                                            167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        305
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                        5417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9204
<SALES>                                            901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   901
<CGS>                                              467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (374)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                                          , 2001

Ashford.com, Inc.
3800 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77098

   Re: Registration Statement on Form S-4

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-4 originally filed by
Ashford.com, Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Commission") on     , 2001, as thereafter amended or supplemented (the
"Registration Statement"), in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to     shares of the Company's Common
Stock (the "Shares"). As your counsel in connection with this transaction, we
have examined the proceedings taken and are familiar with the proceedings
proposed to be taken by you in connection with the issuance of the Shares.

   It is our opinion that, upon completion of the proceedings being taken or
contemplated by us, as your counsel, to be taken prior to the issuance of the
Shares and upon completion of the proceedings being taken in order to permit
such transactions to be carried out in accordance with the securities laws of
the various states where required, the Shares, when issued in the manner
described in the Registration Statement and in accordance with the resolutions
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, will be legally and validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

   We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to said Registration
Statement, and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in
said Registration Statement, including the joint proxy statement/prospectus
constituting a part thereof, and in any amendment or supplement thereto.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          GUNDERSON DETTMER STOUGH
                                          VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGAN, LLP
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Lease Amendment 
 This lease amendment
dated the 6 day of June, 2014, amends that certain lease entered into May 26th, 2010 by and between Manitex International, Inc (‘Tenant”) and KB Building LLC.
(“Landlord”). 
 WHEREAS Tenant wishes to extend the term of the Lease and Landlord is willing to do so, 

NOW THEREFORE landlord and Tenant agree as follows: 

1. Paragraph 2.01 is hereby amended to read: 

The term of this Lease (the “Term”) shall commence May 26, 2010 on the date hereof (the “Commencement Date”) and shall
end on the last day of the one hundred and twentieth (120th) full calendar month after the Commencement Date, or if one or more extension options is/are exercised by Tenant as provided
herein, the date for expiration of the last such extension to be exercised (the “Expiration Date”). 
 2. Paragraph 27.01 is hereby
amended to read: 
 Tenant shall have the option to extend the term of this Lease for six additional one year periods, the first such
extension period beginning on the first day of the one hundred and twenty first (121st) full calendar month after the Commencement Date and ending on the last day of the one hundred and
thirty second (132nd) full calendar month after the Commencement Date (such extension period hereinafter referred to as the “First Extension Term”). Similarly, each additional
successive extension period (from time to time referred to herein as the “Extension Terms”) shall commence on the first day immediately following the expiration of the preceding term, and terminate at the end of twelve months thereafter.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, Tenant shall not be entitled to so extend the Term of the Lease if Tenant is in default under this Lease at the time for exercise of any such extension beyond applicable notice and cure periods provided
herein. The option to extend the Term granted to Tenant shall be automatic for each successive Extension Term, and each successive Extension Term shall commence automatically upon the expiration of the then current Term unless, Tenant gives written
notice to Landlord, not less than six (6) months prior to the Expiration Date of the First, or any 







 subsequent Extension Term, that it wishes not to extend the Term beyond the then current
Expiration Date. 
  

			
	LANDLORD:	  	TENANT:
		
	KB Building, LLC ,	  	MANITEX, INTERNATIONAL INC.,
	An Illinois limited liability company	  	a Michigan corporation

  

									
	 By
	 	/s/ David J. Langevin	 		 	By	 	/s/ Andrew M. Rooke
		 	David J. Langevin	 		 		 	Andrew Rooke, President
					
		 		 		 		 	 /s/ Dody A. Lesniak

		 		 		 		 	 Notary Public

		 		 		 		 	 Cook County, Illinois

					
		 		 		 		 	 My Commission Expires: 12/14/17


  

  
 (2)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Francisco Ramirez, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E224, Washington, DC 20202-6200. Telephone: (202) 260-1541 or by e-mail:                         *francisco.ramirez@ed.gov.*

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

## VIII. Other Information

*Accessible Format:*                         Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (                        *e.g.,*                         braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         in section VII of this notice.                    

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister.*                         To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site.                    

# Note:

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register**                            . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.*

Dated: August 27, 2010.

Thelma Meléndez de Santa Ana,

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.

[FR Doc. 2010-21877 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
#### John Michael WATSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46539.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1973.

R. H. Stauffacher, Jr., Houston, for appellant.

Carol Vance, Dist. Atty., Phyllis Bell and Warren White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from an order revoking probation.

On August 22, 1969, appellant entered a plea of guilty and was convicted for the offense of burglary and his punishment was assessed at five years. Imposition of sentence was suspended and he was placed on probation, one of the terms and conditions being that he commit no offense against the laws of this state or any other state, or of the United States.

On November 3, 1971, appellant was indicted for the offense of robbery by assault.1 On October 27, 1971, a motion to revoke appellant’s probation was filed alleging that he did in fact violate the terms and conditions of his probation by committing the aforementioned offense of robbery by assault.

On January 21, 1972, appellant, in open court, made both written and oral stipulation of evidence under oath, which stipulation includes a judicial confession of the robbery by assault offense and he further made both written and oral admission of his having violated the terms of his probation as set out by the motion in the instant cause. The court revoked the probation and sentence was pronounced from which this appeal is taken.

Counsel on appeal asserts that he has made a careful and diligent examination of the record in this cause and is of the opinion that the appeal is non-meritorious and therefore wholly frivolous. The brief does, however, set out contentions that might show an abuse of discretion of the trial court in revoking the probation. The record reflects that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant. No pro se brief has been filed.

The record has been reviewed and it is concluded that the appeal is frivolous and *152wholly without merit. The contentions set out in the brief are overruled.

No abuse of discretion has been shown by entering the order revoking probation.

No motion for rehearing will be filed by the clerk except by leave of this court upon a showing of good cause.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. See Watson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 150 (this day decided).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,455
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,455)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0016

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 24, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 16 2023

06/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0016