UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549  _________________________  FORM 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1) _________________________  q REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12 (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014  q TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to  q SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report   Commission File Number 001-32500  TANZANIAN ROYALTY EXPLORATION CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)  ALBERTA, CANADA (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)  44th Floor, Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 3Y4 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)  James Sinclair Chief Executive Officer Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation 44th Floor, Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 3Y4 Telephone:  1.844.364.1830 Fax: 860.799.0350 (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)  Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Shares, without Par Value NYSE MKT LLC (Title of Class) Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered  Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE  Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:  NONE    Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:  101,325,880.  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. qYes xNo  If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  q  Yes   x  No  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. xYes qNo  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). qYes qNo  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one): Large accelerated filer q Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer q  Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP  q International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board  x Other  q   If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Company has elected to follow. Item 17  q Item 18  q  If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  q Yes  x No      EXPLANATORY NOTE Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation (the Company) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F/A (Amendment) to the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2014 (Form 20-F), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 11, 2014 (Original Filing Date) to respond to certain comments raise by the staff of the SEC.  The Amendment is amending Item 4 of the Form 20-F to clarify mineral pricing and cost assumptions associated with respect to certain cut-off grade for mineral resources, and that it is an exploration stage company.  This Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Form 20-F, speaks as of the Original Filing Date, does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the Original Filing Date, and does not modify or update any disclosure made in the Form 20-F unless otherwise amended in this Amendment. Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Mineral Resources  As an Alberta corporation, the Company is subject to certain rules and regulations issued by Canadian Securities Administrators.  The Company files its Annual Report on Form 20-F as its Annual Information Form (AIF) with the British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario Securities Commissions via the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR).  Under the filing requirements for an AIF, the Company is required to provide detailed information regarding its properties including mineralization, drilling, sampling and analysis, security of samples, and mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, if any.  Further, the Company may describe its properties utilizing terminology such as measured mineral resources, indicated mineral resources and inferred mineral resources that are permitted by Canadian securities regulations, but are not recognized by the SEC.  (see Glossary of Technical Terms  Canadian Terminology herein)  The Company advises U.S. investors that while the terms measured mineral resources, indicated mineral resources and inferred mineral resources are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, the SEC and its regulations do not recognize them.  U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral resources in these categories will ever be converted into mineral reserves.  Further, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are not recognized in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC.  In addition, National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, as adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators (NI 43-101) permits disclosure of contained ounces of mineralization. In contrast, the SEC only permits issuers to report mineralization as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.  For clarification, the Company has no properties that contain mineral reserves as defined by either the SEC or Canadian securities regulations.      1


Part I    Item 4. Information on the Company   A. History and Development of the Company  The Company was originally incorporated under the name 424547 Alberta Ltd. in the Province of Alberta on July 5, 1990, under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta).  The name was changed to Tan Range Exploration Corporation on August 13, 1991.  The name of the Company was again changed to Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporationon February 28, 2006.  The Company is also registered in the Province of British Columbia as an extra-provincial company under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and in the Province of Ontario as an extra-provincial company under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario).  The principal executive office of the Company is located at 44th Floor, Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3Y4, Canada, and its telephone number is (604) 696-4236.      For the year ended August 31, 2014, the Company reported a net loss of $2,416,265.  Included in the net loss is $1,209,640 of mineral properties and deferred exploration expenses that was written off relating to abandoned mineral properties.  The Company incurred deferred exploration expenditures of 2,329,901 during the year ended August 31, 2014.  In connection with our disclosure of mineral resources and the cut-off grade associated with each mineral resource, we have made certain assupmtions for mineral pricing and cost associated with each cut-off grade to determine the reasonable prospects for economic extraction as discussed below.  Significant Acquisitions and Significant Dispositions  The Companys principal capital expenditures and divestitures (including interests in other companies and amounts invested) for the last three fiscal years are described as follows:  On December 21, 2010, the Company announced it was the successful bidder for the Buckreef Gold Mine Re-development Project in northern Tanzania (the Buckreef Project).  Pursuant to the terms of the heads of agreement dated December 16, 2010, the Company paid U.S. $3,000,000 to Stamico in consideration of the transaction.  On October 25, 2011, a Definitive Joint Venture Agreement was entered into with Stamico for the development of the Buckreef Project.  Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Tanzam, the Company holds a 55% interest in the joint venture company, Buckreef Gold Company Limited, with Stamico holding the remaining 45%.       On August 12, 2011, the Company completed a US$30 million bought deal offering and 5,263,158 Units at a price of US$5.70 per Unit were issued.  Each Unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at a price of US$6.25 per warrant expiring on August 12, 2013.  The Underwriter received a cash commission of 7% of the gross proceeds and 368,421 compensation warrants exercisable at a price of US$5.91 per share expiring on August 12, 2013. Effective December 7, 2011, the exercise price of 5,263,158 common share purchase warrants was reduced from US$6.25 to US$4.00 and the term of the warrants was extended one year to expire August 12, 2014, which warrants have now expired.  On March 27, 2012, the Company received US$1,000,000 from the exercise of 250,000 compensation warrants.  The balance of the compensation options expired.  On November 28, 2012 the Company announced the formation of a new company, NWBM to explore the Kabanga nickel, cobalt and platinum group metals belt.  NWBM is owned 75% by the Company, 15% by Stamico, and 10% by Songshan.    The Company awarded a contract to Venmyn Independent Projects (Pty) Limited, a subsidiary of Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited, to undertake an update of the21 August 2012National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Buckreef Project in Tanzania.  The updatedreport is dated February 24, 2014 (the


2


Updated Buckreef Technical Project) and it was filed on SEDAR on February 24, 2014.  See Mineral Properties.  The Company completed the heap leach pad construction at its Buckreef redevelopment gold project, located in the Lake Victoria Goldfields of Tanzania for a total cost of $1,682,355.  Construction began in April 2014 and was completed as of September 2, 2014, and was overseen by civil contractor Yale-Constech Company Limited.  Four heap leach cells with dimensions of 100 metres by 30 metres each are complete. This will support the processing of stacked ore delivered from the Buckreef South Pit. The Company has also completed a significant portion of the Buckreef South Pit preparation, including grade control drilling, maps and roads.   B. Business Overview  The Company is a mineral resource company with exploration stage properties, which engages in the acquisition of interests in and the exploration of natural resource properties and the development of those properties where warranted. The Company commits its own resources to the initial evaluation of mineral properties and in select situations, if and when warranted, the Company enters into joint venture agreements with other corporations to further the exploration of such properties, in exchange for annual rental/option payments and post-production royalty payments or with a view to direct development of a mine for the purpose of earning income from the sale of gold and other mined materials. At present, the Companys natural resource activities do not generate any income from production.  The Companys main area of interest has been in the exploration and development of gold properties, with a primary focus on exploring for and developing gold properties in Tanzania.  Tanzania remains the focus of the Companys exploration and development activities.  In the Companys view, its use of a joint venture and royalty strategy in addition to direct exploration and development offers investors leverage to precious and base metal prices with lower risk and shareholder dilution. Future production royalties from any producing properties discovered by joint venture partners would provide the Company with a direct interest in the mines cash flow, with exposure to any benefits from new discoveries and production growth, but without the capital obligations, and environmental and social liabilities, associated with direct ownership.   Plan of Operations  Exploration Activities  All of the properties in which the Company holds an interest are in the exploration, preliminary economic assessment or extration stages of mining.  Mineral exploration and extraction involves a high degree of risk and few properties, which are explored, are ultimately developed into producing mines.  There is no assurance that the Companys mineral exploration activities will result in any discoveries of commercial bodies of ore.  The long-term profitability of the Companys operations will be in part directly related to the cost and success of its exploration programs, which may be affected by a number of factors beyond the control of the Company.  By way of general description of the Companys operating activities, the Companys business operations involve using known or published geological and geophysical data to locate mineral resource properties meriting further exploration or development.  Once identified, the Company must stake and apply for registration to title of the mineral properties, or negotiate the acquisition of such properties from any third party owners.  Upon registration or acquisition of title, the Company then designs a program of preliminary exploration which can involve grid mapping, geophysical and magnetic surveying, geochemical surveying, geological sampling, grab sampling, assaying and other forms of prospecting as circumstances may require.  Based on the preliminary results, mineral properties are ranked according to merit for further exploration work, which may involve further mapping, more detailed geophysical and geochemical surveying, and trenching to identify potential drill targets.  If mineralization is indicated which merits further investigation, drill targets are selected and a preliminary RC drilling program commences for underground sampling and


3


assaying.  If the results are positive, then a diamond drilling program will commence mainly to check, verify and confirm the mineralization potential of the prospect.  Based on the drilling program results, the Company will develop models of the underlying geology and mineralized zones for more detailed testing.  After further drilling, some mineralized zones will then be modeled using relevant geological software and ultimately be classified as inferred or indicated mineral resources.  With sufficient infill drilling, these inferred or indicated mineral resources can be confirmed as a measured mineral resource, upon which a pre-feasibility study can be prepared by a qualified, independent mining engineer or geologist to determine whether mining activities are economic in the circumstances of the particular property.  A pre-feasibility study must be completed under the requirements of NI 43-101 in Canada in order for mineral reserves to be designated and to confirm the appropriate mining and mineral processing method based on the geological and metallurgical studies of the ore.  A final or bankable feasibility study must be completed for the designation of reserves under the SECs Industry Guide 7.  If the bankable feasibility study is favorable, the Company can then use the feasibility study to seek out the necessary financing from a merchant banker or other financial institution for mine construction and development.  The Company continued its efforts for the farming-out of identified properties for royalty agreements with other mining companies, and continues to examine and review other exploration opportunities in Tanzania.  Highlights  for the year ended August 31, 2014  · Construction of the Heap Leach Plant for the Buckreef Project Gold Minelocated in the Lake Victoria Goldfields of Tanzania was initiated.Among significant progress made during the reported period include completion ofheap leachpads, four 100m by 30m heap leach.This will support the processing of stacked ore delivered from the Buckreef South Pit.  · Grade control drilling was initiated over the Buckreef South Block.  Results from 250 drill holes provided detailed data required for mapping and identifying the highest ore grade material to supply the heap leach extraction plant.  · Over 70% of the total holes drilled into Buckreef South Block intercepted ore material grading greater than 0.5g/t Au.  This high-density drilling program confirmed two distinct mineralized zones termed as Buckreef South Zone One (BSZO) and Buckreef South Zone Two (BSZT) with an average grade of 3.16g/t Au and 5.31g/t Au respectively.  · Construction of resource models for Buckreef prospects (Buckreef Main, Eastern Porphyry, Bingwa and Tembo) was carried out during the period.  This process was preceded by the construction of geological and mineralization wireframes for the four Buckreef Prospects.  · Positive Metallurgical Test results for Buckreef Bingwa Deposit confirmed potential or low cost mining for Buckreef Bingwa Deposit.  · The Company announced a 121% increase in gold resource for the Buckreef Main Prospect and a 39.2% increase for the entire Buckreef Project.  These results show gold ounces contained in measured and indicated categories containing approximately 2.4 million ounces.  On February 24, 2014 the Company filed on SEDAR a NI 43-101 independent technical report for the updated mineral resource estimate.  · Two key permits granted for blasting and chemical processing at the Companys Buckreef open cut area.  · On February 24, 2014, the Company and Allied Gold Corp. (AGC) of United Arab Emirates announced it had signed a letter of intent to develop a commercially producing mine Buziba-


4


Busolwa area, Tanzania.  This will be a stand-alone development that will encompass the Buziba site within the Companys Buckreef Gold Project.  · Buckreef Gold Company Limited (BGCL), a joint venture company owned by the Company and the State Mining Corporation (STAMICO) was awarded an Environmental Impact Assessment Certificate for the Buckreef Gold Project.  · The official signing ceremony of the Kigosi Mining Licence was held in October 2013.  Company a Ministry for Energy and Minerals representatives attended the ceremony.  · Biogeochemical (BGC) field sampling was carried out in the Kabanga Nickel belt.  Buckreef Project  During the 2014 fiscal year, the Companys main activities focused on the Buckreef Project.  Mine Development and Operations  Progress  The project successfully completed a critical year with the completion of construction of four heap leach cells with dimensions of 100 metres by 30 metres each, as scheduled. The completion of heap leach pad and preparing the Buckreef South Pit for ore mining were two of the major objectives in the Companys march to production.  Throughout the year, significant improvements were made to the surrounding infrastructure, especially demolishment of the old Buckreef processing plant, and upgrading of approximately 30 kilometres of Buckreef - Katoro road.  Water Use Permit from Lake Tanganyika Basin Water Board and Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) Compliance registration certificate were in the acquisition process after payment for water permit and given Provisional Water Use Permit while other steps for processing the final permits are underway according to the WRMA No. 11 of 2009.  Tanesco electric power line (33Kv) connection to Buckreef camp 100kVA, 33/0.4/0.23kV sub-station was completed.  The construction of the 500m overhead power line from the nearby Tanesco main line was contracted to Agape Enterprises Ltd electric contractors. The activities completed by the contractor included bush clearing of the 500m root way from the Tanesco line to Buckreef substation, erection of 7 wooden electric poles on the line, and the installation of the conductor wire string and a power drop down transformer.  Construction and reinforcement of the fence around the Buckreef camp to enclose all houses at the camp including the main office, power substation and power house was undertaken. The work involved construction and erection of concrete fence poles, and installation of security razor wire and wire mesh.  An updated costing and mining study was completed based on a revised Heap Leach Processing Recovery Method which incorporated the combination of crushing ore to the required size fraction and stacking the ore to the pads for irrigation. This was then integrated into a final mining plan including multi open pit schedules. Optimisation of the mining and processing rates, capital estimate scheduling, and the final design was approved by the Companys Technical Committee.  The revised open pit mining designs and schedules support a 360,000tpa operation, planned for commissioning in the last quarter of 2014 and extending to 2019.  A Memorandum of Agreement of Sale was made and entered into by DMO Technological Services Ltd. of


5


Zimbabwe and Buckreef Gold Company for the purchase of a carbon in column (CIC) plant for the proposed 1000 tpd heap leach operations at Buckreef. The CIC heap leach process plant fabrication which includes carbon adsorption unit, carbon elusion unit, electrowinning unit and gold room unit designs has been completed and fabrication works are expected to be completed before the end of calendar year 2014.  Grade Control drilling program was completed at the South Pit where a total of 6727m were drilled from 282 holes using a 5m x 10m x 24m grid to define & confirm Buckreef south ore zone as defined from the Buckreef block model. The drilling confirmed two distinct mineralized zones termed as Buckreef South Zone One and Zone Two with an average grade of 3.16g/t Au and 5.31g/t Au respectively over average mineralized intersection widths of 7.65m and 10.5m respectively.  Significant intercepts reported include:  Buckreef South Zone One  Drill hole BMGC00120 returned interval of 5 metres grading 4.77g/t Au from 19m  24m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00134 returned interval of 7 metres grading 1.68g/t Au from 12m - 19m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00162 returned interval of 4 metres grading 4.43g/t Au from 18m - 22m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00163 returned interval of 8 metres grading 3.40g/t Au from 9m  17m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00164 returned interval of 4 metres grading 2.75g/t Au from 4m  8m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00176 returned interval of 4 metres grading 6.12g/t Au from 20m  24m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00177 returned interval of 8 metres grading 7.27g/t Au from 13m  21m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00178 returned interval of 8 metres grading 7.18g/t Au from 5m  13m depth.  Buckreef South Zone Two  Drill hole BMGC00128 returned interval of 4 metres grading 3.76g/t Au from 11m  15m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00129 returned interval of 5 metres grading 9.68g/t Au from 10m  15m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00130 returned interval of 4 metres grading 3.07g/t Au from 2m  6m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00156 returned interval of 16 metres grading 4.10g/t Au from 0m  6m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00157 returned interval of 6 metres grading 3.01g/t Au from 4m  8m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00172 returned interval of 12 metres grading 8.25g/t Au from 12m  24m depth.  Drill hole BMGC00175 returned interval of 17 metres grading 12.93g/t Au from 5m  22m depth.  Buckreef Project environmental impact assessment study was completed and a certificate of environmental impact Assessment was awarded to the Buckreef project.  Buckreef enlarged Mining Licence (SML04/92) land valuation work was completed and the valuation and resettlement report was approved by the Chief Government Valuer for compensation.  Management is currently reviewing the valuation to determine what, if any, resettlement will be required for mining the various deposits.  The BZMA Project entered a development pipeline after BGCL, a project subsidiary of the Company, (55% by Tanzanian Royalty and 45% by Stamico, signed a letter of intent in February 2014 with ARL Gold Tanzania Limited, a subsidiary of Allied Gold Company of United Arab Emirates, to conclude a Definitive Joint Venture Agreement for the standalone mine development of the Buziba-Busolwa resource.  Itetemia Project  The Itetemia gold deposit includes the Mineral Resources of the Golden Horseshoe Reef (GHR), and is an advanced stage exploration project focusing on the development of the GHR. Significant metres of drilling and sampling so frar completed over the GHR and surrounding areas has culminated in the estimation of the following Mineral Resources, by CSA Australia Pty (Ltd) (CSA).  The gold resource numbers for the GHR are as at 8th March 2011 using a cut-off grade of 1.0g/t:-


6


DOMAINCLASSIFICATIONVOLUME
(m3)TONNES
(t)GRADE
(g/t)OUNCES
ozMain LodeIndicated816,0002,390,0003.14241,000Inferred355,0001,053,0003.68125,000TOTAL MAIN LODE1,171,0003,443,0003.31366,000Footwall LodeIndicated141,000409,0001.9225,000Inferred128,000380,0002.5731,000TOTAL FOOTWALL LODE269,000789,0002.2357,000TOTAL INDICATED957,0002,799,0002.96266,000TOTAL INFERRED483,0001,433,0003.39156,000 Rounding results in computational discrepancies.  The main activity completed for the Itetemia project were the studies (final metallurgical testwork, process engineering designs, etc.) undertaken by MaSS Resources company. The Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) studies, contracted to Efficient Consultants environmental experts, are near completion and the report has been submitted to NEMC for approval in connection with an applicaton for a certificate of environmental impact assessment.  Kigosi Project  Kigosi Mining Licence (ML/13) and Environmental impact assessment certificate were both granted to the Kigosi Project in the period. We considered a number of potential production scenarios for the Kigosi Project. One scenario is the potential for a modest low-capital start-up operation based on extracting gold from extensive surface rubble and gravel mineralization which has been the subject of a NI 43-101 Technical Report. The Kigosi gravel Coarse Gravity Recovery testwork final report using a Python Gekko gravity recovery process system was completed.  The testwork indicates positive results as the overall gold recovery, based on pre-concentration by gravity and flotation, followed by intensive cyanide leaching at a grind size of 80% passing 0.106mm size, is 95.2%. This is based on a sample with a calculated head grade of 3.93 g/t Au; leach residue grade is 0.05 g/t and flotation tailings grade is 0.25g/t. The overall gold recovery achievable at the different leach conditions was determined using the average calculated head grade. The Table below summarises the testwork results for the Kigosi gravel ore.


|                                    |                          |                                  |                      |                         |                 
|----------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------------------- | -------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------
|Test ID                             | Calc Au Head Grade (g/t) | Pre-concentration Recoveries (%) | Leach Recoveries (%) | Overall Au Recovery
(%) | Residue Au (g/t)
|LBUC 01
( Concentrate @ P80 As-is)  | 3.93                     | 95.3                             | 99.1                 | 94.2                    | 0.51            
|LBUC 02
( Concentrate @ P80 106 μm) | 3.93                     | 95.3                             | 99.9                 | 95.2                    | 0.05            

Kigosi Project area remains subject to a Game Reserve Declaration Order.Upon repeal or amendment of that order by the Tanzanian Government, the Kigosi Mining Company will be legally entitled to exercise its rights under the Mineral Rights and Mining Licence. The procedures for degazzetting the Kigosi mining licence project area from a game reserve area to a mining area on the government gazette have not yet been completed by the government of Tanzania.  Luhala Project  The Luhala Project is an advanced stage exploration project focusing on the development of the Luhala gold deposit which consists of five anomalous hilltops. The mineralisation is stratabound shear-zone hosted gold mineralisation (stratigraphic and structural control) within a distinct unit of felsic rocks with associated ferruginised mafics and felsics.


7


Varying amounts of drilling and sampling have been conducted over the various deposits at Luhala, which has to-date resulted in the estimation, by CSA, of the following Mineral Resources for Luhala as at 8th March 2011 using a cut-off grade of 1.0g/t:-  DOMAIN / ZONECLASSIFICATIONVOLUME
(m3)TONNES
(t)GRADE
(g/t)OUNCES
ozKisunge CentralInferred410,000870,0001.7648,900Kisunge East110,000240,0002.1516,800Kisunge South60,000120,0001.686,300Shilalo South100,000200,0002.4715,900Shilalo West200,000430,0001.7323,900TOTAL LUHALA PROJECT880,0001,860,0001.87112,000TOTAL INFERRED880,0001,860,0001.87112,000GRAND TOTAL880,0001,860,0001.87112,000 Rounding results in computational discrepancies.  The Company is currently seeking bids to prepare the study required in connection with an application for a mining licence for the Luhala Project.  Lunguya Project  The Lunguya gold project is situated on a major NW-SE regional shear zone which extend north into Barricks Bulyanhulu gold mine (>10M oz).  Gold in these shear zones occur in narrow shear-foliated quartz veins in sheared contacts between basalts and granites. Potential for the discovery of an economic resource from Luhala can be inferred from active small scale mining activities which are contiguous with Luhala.  Work so far completed at Luhaha has identified bulls eye gold in soil anomalies and RAB-drilled contact along the granite-greenstone contacts.  Reassessment is ongoing to determine whether additional work is required to upgrade the resource.  Kabanga Nickel Project  There were no exploration activities on the Kabanga Project licences in fiscal 2014 due to the Companys strategy to concentrate on projects with potential to generate near term cash flow, more specifically gold production start up. The Kabanga nickel and base metals project remain as the most potential mineral fields in the country for base metal mineralization (Nickel, PGM, tin, wolfram, coltan etc.).  For example, previous test work that was carried out on BGC on the Ni anomalies in the Kabirizi and Buhamila licences demonstrate potential for future ground follow up exploration.  The Company will continue to explore opportunities to maximise shareholder value and closely follow development of the adjacent Barrick/Xstrata Project Nickel Project.  However, the Company has taken a conservative approach to deferred carry values and conservation of cash.  Exploration Projects  Following the Companys decision to include mine development in its strategy of working toward generating maximum revenue from its extensive portfolio of properties, and with the rising costs of maintaining prospecting and other licences in Tanzania, management decided to drop some licences.  A technical team was formed to review the prospectivity of the entire licence portfolio in Tanzania and propose to management licences to be dropped. Thirty-nine (39) licences were proposed to be dropped by the technical team and the licences were approved for relinquishment by the Companys Technical Committee.


8


Exploration  The Companys principal exploration properties are currently all located in the United Republic of Tanzania, Africa.  The government of Tanzania is a stable, multi-party democracy.  Mineral exploration in Tanzania is affected by local climatic, political, and economic conditions.  The Companys properties have year round access, although seasonal summer rains from December to March may result in flooding in low lying areas, which are dominated by mbuga (black organic rich laustrine flood soils).  Further, most lowland areas are under active cultivation for corn, rice, beans and mixed crops by subsistence farmers.  As a result, the area has been deforested by local agricultural practices for many years.  The seasonal rains and deforested areas can create a muddy bog in some areas, which can make access more difficult, and could impede or even prevent the transport of heavy equipment to the Companys mineral properties at certain times of the year between December and March.  Competition  The mining industry in which the Company is engaged is in general, highly competitive.  Competitors include well-capitalized mining companies, independent mining companies and other companies having financial and other resources far greater than those of the Company.  The Company competes with other mining companies in connection with the acquisition of gold and other precious metal properties.  In general, properties with a higher grade of recoverable mineral and/or which are more readily mineable afford the owners a competitive advantage in that the cost of production of the final mineral product is lower.  Thus, a degree of competition exists between those engaged in the mining industry to acquire the most valuable properties.  As a result, the Company may eventually be unable to acquire attractive gold mining properties.  Dependence on Customers and Suppliers  The Company is not dependent upon a single or few customers or supplier for revenues or its operations.   Governmental Regulations  As of November 1, 2010, the Tanzania Mining Act, 2010 (Mining Act, 2010) came into effect.  The Tanzania Ministry of Energy and Minerals announced changes to fees effective July 27, 2012.  The Companys mineral interests in Tanzania are initially held under prospecting licenses granted pursuant to the Mining Act, 2010 for a period of up to four years, and are renewable two times for a period of up to two years each.  The Company must pay annual rental fees for its prospecting licenses based on the total area of the license measured in square kilometres, multiplied by US$100/sq.km for the initial period, $150/sq.km for the first renewal and $200/sq.km for the second renewal.  There is also an initial one-time preparation fee of US$500 per license.  Upon renewal, the Company must pay a renewal fee of US$300 per license.  Renewals of its prospecting licenses can take many months and even years to process by the regulatory authority in Tanzania.  All prospecting licenses in Tanzania also require the holder to expend funds which are set out in the Mining Act, 2010.  At each renewal, at least 50% of the Companys licensed area must be relinquished on prospecting licences in excess of 20 square kilometres.  On relinquishing the ground, the area is automatically returned to the Mining Commissoners jurisdiction for a period of 4 months after which it will be declared vacant or otherwise by the Commissioner.  If the Company still has an interest in the relinquished one-half portion, it must then file a new application in competition with other interested companies for the relinquished portion 4 months after the relinquishment date.  If more than one application is lodged on the same day at the Mining Commissioners office, then the Commissioner may award the ground by tender.  There is no guarantee on the timing for processing the new application and whether it will be successful.  The Company must hold a mining license or special mining licence to carry on mining activities.  Pursuant to the Mining Act, 2010 a mining license is granted for a maximum initial period of 10 years.  It is


9


renewable 6 months prior to expiry for a period the applicant will state but not exceeding 10 years.  A special mining licence is granted for the estimated life of the ore body indicated in the feasibility study report, or such period as the applicant may request whichever period is shorter.  It is renewable for a period not exceeding the estimated life of the remaining ore body.  Prospecting and special mining and mining license holders must submit regular reports in accordance with mining regulations.  Upon commercial production, the government of Tanzania imposes a royalty on the gross value of all production at the rate of 4% of all gold produced.  The applicable regulatory body in Tanzania is the Ministry of Energy and Minerals.  An environmental impact statement and an environmental management plan must accompany special mining license, mining license and gemstone mining license applications for mineral rights.  In addition to the establishment of environmental regulations, the Tanzanian Government has improved management procedures for effective monitoring and enforcement of these regulations by strengthening the institutional capacity, especially in the field offices.  The Government has provided rules for the creation of reclamation funds to reinstate land to alternative uses after mining and it has developed guidelines for mining in restricted areas, such as forest reserves, national parks, sources of water and other designated areas.   C. Organizational Structure  The Company has the following seven subsidiaries:


|                                                                     |                               |                                                               |    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | ---
|Name of Subsidiary                                                   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Percentage &Type of Securities Owned or Controlled by Company
|Voting Securities Held                                               | Non-Voting Securities        
|Itetemia Mining Company Limited                                      | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 90%  (1)common shares                                         | N/A
|Lunguya Mining Company Ltd.                                          | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 60% (2)common shares                                          | N/A
|Tancan Mining Company Limited                                        | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 100% 
common shares                                           | N/A
|Tanzania American International Development Corporation 2000 Limited | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 100% 
common shares                                           | N/A




|                                     |                               |                                                               |    
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | ---
|Name of Subsidiary                   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Percentage &Type of Securities Owned or Controlled by Company
|Voting Securities Held               | Non-Voting Securities        
|Buckreef Gold Company Limited (BGCL) | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 55% (3)common shares                                          | N/A
|Northwest Basemetals Company Limited | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 75% (4)common shares                                          | N/A
|BGCL/AGC Joint Venture (6)           | Republic of Tanzania, Africa  | 40% (5)common shares                                          | N/A

(1) The remaining 10% interest is held by State Mining Corporation.  (2) The remaining 40% interest is held by Northern Mining and Consultancy Company Ltd.  (3) The remaining 45% interest is held by State Mining Corporation.  (4) The remaining interest is held 15% by State Mining Corporation and 10% by Songshan.


10


(5) The remaining interest is held 60% by Allied Gold Corp. of United Arab Emirates.  (6) Joint venture letter of intent signed and subject to final approval.   D. Property, Plant and Equipment  The Companys business is the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties, with a primary focus on exploring for gold properties in Tanzania.  Historically, the Company has funded its activities by way of the sale and issuance of its securities.  The Company also obtains operating funds through sales of and options to sell its various mineral property interests to other parties, retaining a royalty interest.  The Companys properties are without a known body of commercial ore, with no established mineral reserves, and the Companys activities to date on such properties have been exploratory and developmental in nature.  Mineral Properties   Buckreef Project  History  The Lake Victoria Goldfields (LVG) was discovered in 1894 by German explorers and significant exploitation began in the 1930s at the Geita Gold Mine. Several small gold mines exploiting near surface reefs, operated throughout the Rwamagaza Greenstone Belt (RGB), particularly near the village of Rwamagaza.  By 1940, Tanzania was producing 4.5tpa of gold (Au).  Gold bearing quartz veins were reported from the current Buckreef Mine area in 1945 and reports from the 1950s attest to ongoing production at a number of localities near Rwamagaza, including the Buckreef area. The extent of the small scale local and colonial mining activities is evident from the numerous pits and adits covering the entire Buckreef tenement; however, no production figures are available.  An airborne geophysical survey was flown during 1959 over the RGB, in a joint effort between the United Nations and the Tanzanian Mineral Resources Division, with a ground magnetic survey follow-up between 1965 to 1968. The Buckreef quartz vein hosted deposit was rediscovered in 1965 and followed-up by drilling by the Tanzanian Mineral Resources Division.  The Buckreef Mine was an underground mine exploited in the name of the Buckreef Gold Mining Company (BGMC) approved by Stamico in 1982 and the exploration and mining activities during this period are summarised in the table below. The mining ceased in 1990 due to a number of operational reasons and the mine flooded. Approximately 100,000t of Run of Mine (RoM) ore was mined at a diluted grade of approximately 3g/t Au to 4g/t Au. In 1994, the Buckreef Redevelopment Agreement was signed between the State of Tanzania and East Africa Mines Limited (EAM) and additional surface and subsurface gold resources were identified.  Post 1990, a new phase of modern exploration focused on potential Archaean deposits in the Lake Victoria region and the LVG developed after significant gold discoveries.  EAM explored 40km of contiguous strike length of the RGB. During that time (2003) Spinifex Gold, the original parent company to EAM, merged with Gallery Gold Limited of Australia (Gallery Gold). Gallery Gold then became the parent company of EAM. Iamgold Corporation (Iamgold) acquired Gallery Gold in March 2006 and held the Buckreef Project until July 2009.


11


Summary of Buckreef Exploration and Mining between 1960 and 2003  DATEEXPLORATION UNDERTAKEN***196013 diamond drill holes by UNDP (12 in current database, UNBR01-12) identified a possible ore zone 107m long, 8m wide and extending to 122m depth196813 diamond drill holes by Tanzanian Mineral Resources Division (MRD01-13)1970sEarly 1970s Underground development on 30m and 61m levels by Williamson Diamonds Ltd. Indicated ore reserve of 106,000t @ 8.7g/t Au between 23m and 76m levels using minimum mining width of 1.5m***1972Tanzanian government approved investment decision and BGMC1973-1979Further underground development and 3 diamond drill holes (BGMDD01-03) by BGMC.1978-1981Treatment plant and other facilities established with financial assistance from Swedish International Development Agency1982-1988Gold production commenced but reached only 25-40% of forecast targets.
Production figure unavailable.1988Review of operations by British Mining Consultants Ltd. who found Buckreef assay laboratory assays 65% higher than overseas check assays1990Mining ceased and workings flooded. Total ore extracted estimated at approximately 100,000t @3-4g/t Au***1992Aircore, RC and diamond drilling by East African Mining Corporation (now East Africa Gold Mines Ltd.)Source: Hellman and Schofield 2007.*** This historical estimate is derived from an unpublished report prepared by Hellman and Schofield (Pty.) Ltd. In 2007. This historical estimate presented above is relevant to the further exploration of the project, which the Company is undertaking. Further drilling would be required to upgrade or verify the historical resource estimate as current mineral resources or reserves. A qualified person, as such term is defined under NI 43-101, has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resource or mineral reserve estimate and the historical estimate should not be relied upon. Please refer to the Buckreef Technical Report.  The technical content of the following discussion regarding the Buckreef Project in Tanzania is summarized from the Buckreef Property technical report dated February 24, 2014 entitled Update National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Buckreef Project in Tanzania for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation prepared by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited and compiled by Fiona Harper, D. Richards and Andrew Neil Clay (the Updated Buckreef Technical Report).  The Updated Buckreef Technical Report was filed on SEDAR on February 24, 2014.  Ownership  Prior Ownership  Originally, the Buckreef Project was an advanced exploration project held by Iamgold Tanzania (IAGT) prior to July 2009. The Agreement to Redevelop the Buckreef Gold Mine (ARBGM) between IAGT and the Ministry for Energy and Minerals included at that point, a single Mining Licence and 12 Prospecting Licences covering 98.19km2.  In July 2009, IAGT applied to surrender all licenses relating to the ARBGM, effective October 25, 2009 and the Commissioner for Minerals withdraw all license applications relating to the ARBGM.  Current Ownership, Property  and Location  In December 2010, the Company signed a binding heads of agreement with Stamico for the Buckreef Project and on October 25, 2011 entered into a Definitive Joint Venture Agreement with Stamico for the development of the project.  Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Tanzam, the Company will hold a 55%


12


interest in the joint venture company, Buckreef Gold Company Limited, with Stamico holding the remaining 45%. The agreement provided for the formation and establishment of a joint venture company, Buckreef Gold Company Limited (BGC Ltd.). On 24th of October 2011, BGC Ltd. was formed and incorporated under certificate of incorporation number 86681.  The Buckreef Project is located in north central Tanzania immediately to the south of Lake Victoria, in the Mwanza Provincial District. The Buckreef Project is situated 110km southwest of Mwanza, in the Geita District and is accessed by ferry across Smiths Sound and then via unpaved roads and an airstrip. The Buckreef Project comprises five gold deposits located within two geographically separated areas approximately 25km apart, termed the Buckreef Mining Area (BRMA) and the Buziba-Busolwa Mining Area (BZMA) and the individual gold deposits within these mining areas have been termed Prospects, as summarized below:-  · BRMA: includes the Buckreef Prospect, the Bingwa Prospect, Eastern Porphyry Prospect and the Tembo Prospect; and  · BZMA: includes the Buziba Prospect and the Busolwa Prospect  An extended mining right was granted to Tanzam (Special Mining Licence 04/1992) encompassing the Buckreef, Bingwa, Eastern Porphyry and Tembo Prospect areas.  The Buziba and Busolwa Prospects are held under a prospecting licence and a retention licence, respectively, and within the BZMA small-scale miners operate under numerous primary mining licences.  Geology and Mineralisation  The BRMA and BZMA gold deposits are classified as low to medium grade orogenic gold deposits hosted by mafic volcanic sequences of the eastwest trending Archaean RGB within the L of the Tanzanian Craton. The BRMA gold deposits are hosted by a major steeply dipping, northeast-southwest trending brittle-ductile shear zone and subsidiary shears, with an early phase of iron rich carbonate alteration, re-brecciation, felsite intrusion and a later phase of auriferous quartz veining.  The BZMA deposit is located 25km east of the Buckreef Prospect in the RGB.  The principal host lithologies include magnesium rich basalt, co-magmatic dolerite and a suite of quartz-albite felsic porphyries that have intruded the mafic sequence. Gold mineralisation is associated with quartz vein arrays that occur in altered shear zones in mafic lithologies and as extensive stock works in the felsic porphyries.  Regional Geological Setting  The Buckreef Project is situated within the LVG of northern Tanzania, which consists of a number of eastwest trending, linear, Archaean greenstone belts, which are separate granite-gneiss terrains within the Tanzanian Craton of east Africa. The LVG is the third largest gold producing region of Africa, surpassed only by the Witwatersrand Basin in South Africa and the Tarkwa region of Ghana.  Numerous gold occurrences have been identified in the LVG, and new discoveries continue to be made. Since 1998, when the first mine, Golden Pride was commissioned, four additional large scale mines namely, Geita, Bulyanhulu, North Mara, and Tuluwaka have come into production.  The greenstone belts comprise mafic volcanics, pyritic sediments, tuffs, iron formation, chert, and felsic volcanics, collectively known as the Nyanzian Group. The metamorphic grade of the Nyanzian Group is lower to middle greenschist facies, and two major deformational episodes have been identified. Amphibolite facies metamorphic rocks are exposed in the western portions of the belt near Tulawaka Mine, but in general higher grade metamorphic complexes are rare.  The greenstone belt sequences have geological and structural similarities to major gold districts in the Canadian Shield (Val d ́Or, Kirkland Lake) and the Yilgarn Craton in Western Australia (Kalgoorlie, Laverton, Leonora, Kambalda and Southern Cross).


13


Gold mineralisation within the LVG occurs in a number of styles including:-  · quartz veins within minor brittle lineaments, most commonly worked on a small scale by artisanal workers, due to their limited extent and erratic gold distribution;  · mineralisation within major ductile shear zones;  · mineralisation associated with replacement of iron formation and ferruginous sediments; and  · felsic (porphyry) hosted mineralisation, such as within the RGB.  Regardless of the geological environment, it is accepted that structural control on the emplacement of the mineralisation is critical. The following structural features have proven to be important foci of gold mineralisation:  · structural lineaments trending at 120o;  · flexures and splays to the 120o trend (such as at Golden Pride);  · structural lineaments at 70o (such as at Golden Ridge); and  · granite-greenstone contacts (such as at the Ushirombo and RGB).  Local Geological Setting  The Buckreef Project area covers the eastern portion of the eastwest trending RGB, which forms part of the Sukumaland Greenstone Belt. The Sukumaland Greenstone Belt is oval shaped and is defined by two intermittently exposed belts of meta-volcanic and meta-sedimentary rocks that surround a core of granitoids and gneisses. The inner belt comprises an older, Lower Nyanzian sequence characterised by basaltic and andesitic lavas and tuffs, whilst the outer, younger, Upper Nyanzian succession consists of iron formation and tuffs. The understanding of the geology in the region has been hampered by the lack of outcrop (less than 2%). Isotopic dating suggests that the sequences are approximately 2.6Ga in age and although no contact between the outer and inner belts is exposed, a general trend of younging outwards is considered valid.  Within the Sukumaland Greenstone Belt, the RGB consists of a sequence of eastwest trending, poorly outcropping basaltic flows and overall the RGB varies in width from 5km to 10km. The mafic sequences consist of komatiitic basalts to the south and tholeitic basalts in the north, separated by the Rwamagaza Shear Zone. The basalts display well preserved volcanic features such as varioles, pillows, and flow top breccias Aeromagnetic data and minor outcrop, indicate the presence of a number of elongate discontinuous, serpentinised, sheared ultramafic bodies which parallel the flow stratigraphy and which could represent either intrusive bodies or the cumulate portions of thick, magnesium rich basaltic lava flows.  Two main clusters of felsic intrusions occur throughout the region and comprise large batholithic granites and porphyry intrusions. The RBG could possibly form part of a much larger mafic belt that has been dissected by the intrusion of large batholithic granites. Aeromagnetic surveys over the Project area indicate the presence of granites at depth. The RBG mafic-ultramafic sequence is strained to varying degrees, with the highest strain occurring in the central area of the Buckreef Prospect tenements, where the belt is thinnest. In this area, the dominant rock type is mafic schist. Toward the thicker (less attenuated) eastern and western parts, the schists form thinner more discrete zones of high strain separating areas of relatively unstrained ultramafic lithologies. The granitoids are generally unstrained and hence assumed to be post


14


peak deformation. A large portion of the basalts to the southeast of Nyarugusu are hornfelsed, suggesting the presence of granite at shallow depths beneath them.  The tectonic evolution of the RGB is very poorly understood. Aeromagnetic data reveals several generations of crosscutting, late stage, brittle-ductile faults and shears, which offset flow stratigraphy and have locally been intruded by the felsic porphyries and by a late stage dolerite dykes. Early formed ductile structures are not easily defined in aeromagnetic data and there is evidence of shear zones that parallel the stratigraphy.  The Project host rocks comprise meta-basalt, which is generally un-deformed but metamorphosed to lower greenschist facies grades. At Buckreef Prospect interflow units of predominantly pelitic and cherty sediments occur, as well as a variety of porphyritic textured, dyke and vein like felsic intrusions along crosscutting structures or sub-parallel to flow stratigraphy.  The RGB has been subjected to a phase of laterite development, with formation of predominantly iron rich ferricrete caps, which were subsequently extensively eroded and only isolated remnants of laterite remain in situ. The high rainfall and sub-tropical climate has resulted in deep laterisation and although there is evidence of localised gold enrichment in the shallow oxidation profiles in both BRMA or BZMA areas, major zones of supergene gold enrichment are not developed in either area. The RGB in general is covered by a thin layer of elluvial regolith, which is amenable to standard soil sampling techniques.  A non-penetrative deformation fabric is developed at Buziba, which dips steeply to the south, sub-parallel to the stratigraphy. Individual zones in which this fabric is well developed cannot be traced for distances of more than a few hundred metres on drill sections, but a number of such zones occur throughout the 200m of thickness of stratigraphy, which hosts the mineralisation.  Exploration Status  The Buckreef Gold Mine was an underground mine operated by the Tanzanian State during the late 1980s.  Apart from the state, several previous owners of the project undertook numerous exploration programmes including aeromagnetic, helicopter borne IP, ground magnetic and soil geochemistry surveys, as well as extensive RC, Air Circulation (AC) and diamond drilling programmes. Iamgold, the most recent historic owner of the project, verified the historic drilling data, undertook additional exploration and defined JORC compliant Mineral Resources in 2006. In total, the exploration programme included approximately 30,000 soil samples, 202,000m of RC drilling, 124,000m of AC drilling and 28,000m of diamond core drilling.  The Company acquired the rights to the Buckreef Project early in 2011 and results of the current metallurgical and geotechnical diamond drilling programs, as well as detailed RC and diamond mineral resource drilling programs, are incorporated in the Updated Buckreef Technical Report. To date, additional mineralisation has been intersected on Buckreef Prospect Main Zone in a wide zone between 150m and 250m vertical depth with assay results of 4.5g/t Au over 26m and 10.58g/t Au over 19m. Additional near surface mineralisation at less than 200m depth, from Buckreef North includes a mineralised zone 46m wide at 2.31g/t Au. Gold mineralisation has also been identified in the Eastern Porphyry deposit 800m east of Buckreef Main Zone, over 500m of strike length with near surface mineralisation ranging between 1.25g/tAu to 6.3g/tAu over widths of 2.25m to 10.5m.  Historic metallurgical testwork programs were undertaken on both the BRMA and BZMA mineralisation types. The testwork on BMRA material indicated that oxide and transitional material are amenable to treatment using typical carbon-in-leach (CIL) processing techniques and fresh material may benefit from flotation and a finer grind with recoveries anticipated to be in the low 90%s.  The testwork results for BZMA mineralisation indicated that it is amenable to treatment using gravity and CIL processing techniques.  Metallurgical recoveries for BZMA mineralisation were anticipated to be in the low to mid 90%s. Heap leaching testwork indicated that, at a 25mm to 50mm crushing size fraction in oxide mineralisation, a 75% recovery could be anticipated, whilst transitional and fresh mineralisation recoveries were lower, at 35% to 50%.


15


Current heap leach metallurgical testwork indicate positive results from column leach test for the oxide ore resources, at a 6mm crushing size fraction in oxide mineralization, a 71% recovery was achieved. Testwork on the sulphide and transition resource indicate a recovery of 58% using a 12.5mm crush size and agglomeration using 4kg/t of lime and 3kg/t of cement.  Previous Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates  Hellman & Schofield (Pty) Ltd (Hellman and Schofield) was retained by the Company to undertake the Mineral Resource estimation for the Buckreef Project reported in the technical report effective June 30, 2011 entitled National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporations Buckreef Gold Project in Tanzania prepared by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited and compiled by Fiona Harper, Andrew Neil Clay and Nicholas J. Johnson (the Buckreef Technical Report).  The Mineral Resource estimates were based partially on a historic dataset that has been verified and deemed suitable for Mineral Resource estimation (Hellman and Schofield 2007), as well as Iamgold exploration data, which is similarly of a standard compliant with National Instrument and JORC reporting requirements. The Mineral Resources were estimated using Multiple Indicator Kriging techniques in GS3 software produced by Hellman and Schofield. The model estimates resources into panels, which approximate the drillhole sample spacing throughout the majority of the study area. The Mineral Resource estimates within each panel were classified according to the distribution of sampling in the kriging neighbourhood and took into account the uncertainty in the estimates related to the proximity and distribution of the informing composites.  Summary of Mineral Resources of the Buckreef Project (Cut-Off 0.5g/t Au) - Dec 2011  DEPOSITMEASUREDINDICATEDINFERREDMEASURED & INDICATEDTonnes (Mt)Au Grade (g/t)Contained Au (Mcz)Tonnes (Mt)Au Grade (g/t)Contained Au (Moz)Tonnes (Mt)Au Grade (g/t)Contained Au (Moz)Tonnes (Mt)Au Grade (g/t)Contained Au (Moz)Buckreef5.1762.050.3413.7061.860.2227.1581.890.4358.8821.970.563Buziba-Busolwa35.2701.041.17914.3500.900.41535.271.041.179Bingwa1.1202.40.086Tembo0.7252.180.051TOTAL5.172.050.3438.971.121.4023.351.320.9844.151.231.74  Source: Hellman and Schofield 2007, 2011; Venmyn 2011. Mineral Resources inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability Estimates over variable widths of 3m to 40m Bulk Density ranges from 2.0g/cm3 to 2.8g/cm3 Inconsistencies in totals are due to rounding down 55% attributable to the Company Cut-off grade 0.5g/t Au  New Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates  A Mineral Resource estimate was completed on the BRMA based on the geological models supplied by CAE Mining. The Mineral Resource estimate was informed by both the diamond drilling and reverse circulation drilling results and a Mineral Resource block model was confined by wireframed interpretations of the volumes of the individual prospects as developed by CAE Mining using Datamine Studio 3 (version 3.21.7164). Venmyn Deloitte carried out the grade estimation using Ordinary Kriging (OK), using Datamine Studio 3 (version 3.20.5321).  The Buckreef Project was modelled for gold grade only using the shell of the wireframe models as hard boundaries. Only data within the wireframes were used in the estimate. The variograms ranges were used to define the search ellipse and each domain was estimated separately. The definition of narrow mineralised stringers which frequently change strike direction posed a difficulty to the estimation process but this issue


16


was solved by the use of local anisotropy Kriging (LAK) for the stringers implemented through Datamine's dynamic anisotropy functions. Specific Gravity values from all prospects and the three alteration zones namely; fresh, transitional and oxide are sufficient for the estimation purposes. Topographic surface models were provided by the Company.  NI 43-101 Compliant Mineral Resource Estimate for BRMA as at 29 November 2013


|                  |          |             |             |                                    |              |       |             |             |                        |              |       |             |             |                        |              |       |             |             |                        |        
|----------------- | -------- | ----------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------ | ----- | ----------- | ----------- | ---------------------- | ------------ | ----- | ----------- | ----------- | ---------------------- | ------------ | ----- | ----------- | ----------- | ---------------------- | -------
|PROSPECT          | MEASURED | INDICATED   | INFERRED    | EXPLORATION TARGETS - Unclassified
|Volume
(Mm3)      | SG       | Tonnes
(Mt) | Grade
(g/t) | Contained
Gold
(oz Au)             | Volume
(Mm3) | SG    | Tonnes
(Mt) | Grade
(g/t) | Contained
Gold
(oz Au) | Volume
(Mm3) | SG    | Tonnes
(Mt) | Grade
(g/t) | Contained
Gold
(oz Au) | Volume
(Mm3) | SG    | Tonnes
(Mt) | Grade
(g/t) | Contained
Gold
(oz Au)
|Buckreef Prospect
|Sub-total         | 3.260    | 2.73        | 8.902       | 1.72                               | 491,529      | 4.764 | 2.75        | 13.100      | 1.41                   | 594,456      | 2.710 | 2.78        | 7.528       | 1.33                   | 322,902      | 1.577 | 2.78        | 4.385       | 1.10                   | 155,321
|Eastern Porphyry 
|Sub-total         | 0.032    | 2.69        | 0.087       | 1.20                               | 3,366        | 0.381 | 2.66        | 1.016       | 1.17                   | 38,355       | 0.474 | 2.61        | 1.239       | 1.39                   | 55,476       | 0.508 | 2.61        | 1.324       | 1.14                   | 48,664 
|Tembo Prospect   
|Sub-total         | 0.006    | 2.70        | 0.017       | 0.99                               | 531          | 0.074 | 2.50        | 0.185       | 1.77                   | 10,518       | 0.109 | 2.45        | 0.267       | 1.93                   | 16,521       | 0.042 | 2.28        | 0.095       | 1.12                   | 3,429  
|Bingwa Prospect  
|Sub-total         | 0.387    | 2.34        | 0.906       | 2.83                               | 82,387       | 0.232 | 2.45        | 0.569       | 1.38                   | 25,274       | 0.122 | 2.57        | 0.312       | 1.29                   | 12,922       | 0.019 | 2.56        | 0.049       | 1.25                   | 1.982  
|Total             | 3.685    | 2.69        | 9.912       | 1.81                               | 577,813      | 5.452 | 2.73        | 14.870      | 1.40                   | 668,602      | 3.416 | 2.74        | 9.345       | 1.36                   | 407,821      | 2.146 | 2.73        | 5.853       | 1.11                   | 209,397
|TOTAL             | 3.68     | 2.69        | 9.91        | 1.81                               | 578,000      | 5.45  | 2.73        | 14.87       | 1.40                   | 669,000      | 3.42  | 2.74        | 9.35        | 1.36                   | 408,000      | 2.15  | 2.73        | 5.85        | 1.11                   | 209,000

Source:  Venmyn Deloitte 2013, CAE Mining 2013 and TRX 2013 Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability Mineral Resources reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves (although no Mineral Reserves are reported) Cut-off Grade 0.5 g/t Au Estimates over variable widths to 1m to 40m Specific Gravity ranges 2.0 to 2.8 Inconsistencies in totals are due to rounding 55% attributable to TRX  The Company has incurred total net costs (after recoveries, if any) of $1,750,582 on the Buckreef Project for the year ended August 31, 2014.   The cut-off grade calculations for the Buckreef Project were based on costs from the Buckreef Project PEA and at the June 2011 gold spot price of approximately USD1,500/oz and a three year trailing average of USD1,024/oz. The economic cut-off grade thus calculated ranges from 0.39g/t Au to 0.6g/t Au which shows that reasonable prospects for economic extraction are possible from grade of 0.39g/t and above. TRX made a strategic decision to publish the Mineral Resource estimate at an average of 0.5g/t Au cut-off as a reasonably conservative position.  The Exploration Target estimate column contained in the foregoing chart was prepared in accordance to the NI 43-101 guidelines of the Canadian securities administrators.  It should be noted that Exploration Targets are conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define them as Mineral Resources, and, while reasonable potential may exist, it is uncertain whether further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource under NI 43-101.  The Exploration Target stated above is not being reported as part of any Mineral Resource or Mineral Reserve.  The Buckreef Project is without known mineral reserves and any exploration program is an exploratory search for ore.   Kigosi Project  Property Description and Location  The Kigosi Project area is principally located within the Kigosi Game Reserve controlled area.  Through prospecting and mining option agreements, the Company has options to acquire interests in several Kigosi prospecting licenses.  A comprehensive report summarizing exploration work done and results to date was submitted to the Director of Wildlife and Nature Conservation as part of the requisite and mandatory requirements for an application to renew the Kigosi game reserve access permit.  It is a statutory requirement to have an access permit to conduct any exploration activities in an area designated as a forest and/or game reserve. On May 31st, 2012 the Company was granted a two year permit from the Ministry of Wildlife and Nature Conservation to enter the Kigosi Game Reserve and continue with exploration activities.  The Company is evaluating various alternatives for advancing the Kigosi Project by focusing on an area of near surface mineralization.


17


In December 2012, the Kigosi Access Agreement between the Company (through its subsidiary Tanzam)  and the Director of Wildlife, Wildlife Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism was signed, and in February 23, 2013, the Company (through Tanzam), was awarded the Environmental Impact Assessment Certificate for the Kigosi gold project.  Stamico has a 15% carried interest in the Kigosi Project.  On May 30, 2013 the Company announced it had been granted a Mineral Rights and Mining Licence through its wholly owned subsidiary, Tanzam.  The Mineral Rights and Mining Licence covers the entire area applied for of 9.91 square kilometres of the Kigosi Project.  The area remains subject to a Game Reserve Declaration Order.  Upon repeal or amendment of that order by the Tanzanian government, the Company will be legally entitled to exercise its rights under the Mineral Rights and Mining Licence.  Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography  The property is accessed via air from the city of Dar Es Salaam on the Indian Ocean coast to the city of Mwanza on the southern shoreline of Lake Victoria.  From Mwanza, a moderately maintained tar road accesses the town of Ushirombo, via the towns of Shinyanga and Kahama, around the southern part of the Lake, referred to as Smith Sound.  This trip is approximately 400 km and takes some 5 hours.  From the town of Ushirombo one keeps heading east along the main Burundi tar road for approximately 6 km, where a dirt track allows access into the Kigosi Game Reserve.  The southern bulk of the Kigosi Project area is wholly located within the northern sector of the Kigosi game reserve with a third of the licenses being located in the adjacent Nikonga-Ushirombo Forestry reserves further north.  As per legal and mandatory requirements, the Company acquired respective renewable permits from the Departments of Game Reserves and Forestry Reserves of the Ministry of Wildlife and Tourism to conduct exploration activities in both the game and forestry reservation areas throughout the year.  Access to the main Kigosi exploration camp via the dirt track has been substantially improved by the Company to allow access by four wheel drive vehicles during the rainy season.  The exploration camp at Kigosi is predominantly a tented facility with larger semi-permanent structures employed for offices and storage facilities. Recent construction included the installation of metal containers which will be utilized as living and office quarters. Communications at the camp are via satellite, internet and telephone.  The access track passes over the Shiperenge River, a tributary to the Nikonga River and both are perennial rivers, typically dry in the winter months and overflowing during the October-May rainy season.  Three (3) large ponds located on the Nikonga River were the only close source of water until recently when the company drilled a highly productive water borehole located some 5km northwest of the camp.  Drinking water for the camp is pumped via pipeline from the borehole to the camp.  The Nikonga and Shiperenge rivers have played a major part in structuring the physiographic landscape in the area.  These rivers drain southwards into the Moyowosi and Njingwe Swamps.  Small undulating granite hills form the topographic highs, and generally trend northwest.  These hills make up approximately 5% of the project area.  The climate is typical of an African tropical climate, being hot during the day and cooling down in the evenings.  Winters are very mild, but a blanket is needed in the early hours of the mornings.  Kigosi falls within a malaria area, and precautions are necessary. Tsetse flies are also present in some parts of the project area.  The region is heavily forested, but has only limited wildlife, chiefly small gazelle and baboons.  Geology and Mineralization  The Kigosi-Miyabi granite-greenstone belt and the Ushirombo greenstone belt, form part of two of the greenstone belts within the Nyanzian Archaean greenstone terrain in northwestern Tanzania.  These belts host small-scale artisanal workings at Luhwaika and Igunda within the core project area at Kigosi and further to the southeast. The Ushirombo Greenstone Belt has been extensively explored by geologists and small scale miners over the past decade. It consists predominantly of mafic volcanics with lesser meta-sedimentary rocks across an east-west trending belt some 50 kilometres in strike. Gold mineralization generally occurs in narrow quartz veins.  The Kigosi-Miyabi Greenstone Belt has been less explored, mainly because of the location within the Kigosi Game Reserve.


18


Several prominent regional scale NW trending structural lineaments, interpreted as regional shear zones, appear to be the major conduits and controls for the localization of gold mineralization in the Kigosi area.  There is also a prominent NNW trending set of regional scale lineaments that are believed to be deep seated sources of the gold bearing fluids.  The Company previously discovered three previously undocumented shear-zone hosted gold mineralized targets and it has also established the presence of a surface to sub-surface horizon of unconsolidated residual in-situ auriferous vein quartz rubble on the Kigosi Property, forming a part of the Companys Lake Victoria Goldfield Properties held through its subsidiary, Tanzam.  The Company received an updated NI 43-101 technical report dated September 1, 2011 from Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited of South Africa (the Kigosi Technical Report). A quartz rubble area of mineralization has been identified which is of particular interest due to its tabular extent and unconsolidated nature.  The 43-101 Technical Report has defined a surface area of 3.36km2 and an average thickness of 1.15m which contains an Indicated Mineral Resource of 3.89 million tons at an in-situ grade of 0.83g/t Au and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 6.30 million tons at a grade of 0.34g/t Au.  The Kigosi Mineral Resource estimate September 2009 includes Mineral Resources from several prospects each with primary mineralisation in shears and secondary mineralisation in alluvial gravels. No cut-off grade was applied to the shear hosted mineralisation and a cut-off of 0.1g/t Au was applied in the case of the gravels just as nominal indicator of the presence of mineralisation. The Kigosi prospect is an early exploration project and no specific costing exercises have been yet been conducted that could be used in an economic cut-off grade calculation. Nonetheless, the effect of introducing and changing cut-off grades was provided in the document as an indicative exercise. The parameters pertaining to prospects for economic extraction in the Victoria Goldfields are well known, and the grades and style of mineralisation reported for the Kigosi prospect were considered relative to this benchmark.  For additional information regarding the Kigosi Property see the Technical Report entitled National Instrument 43-101F Technical Report on the Kigosi Project in the Lake Victoria Greenstone Belt, Tanzania prepared for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited and compiled by C.A. Telfer, N. McKenna, J. Glanvill and R.M. Tayelor dated September 1, 2011 and filed on SEDAR December 13, 2011.  Luhwaika Quartz Rubble Deposit  A brief summary of the work done on the Luhwaika Quartz Rubble Deposit and the Msonga Prospect during the year are briefly summarized. Historical summaries for Luhwaika and Igunda Prospects are also briefly described.  During a previous detailed vertical RC-drilling program on the Luhwaika Prospect, the company established the presence of a consistent and sizeable near-surface quartz-rubble bed with a potentially significant economic potential. The Luhwaika Prospect is host to a potentially economic quartz rubble deposit which is likely a direct result of surface collapse and erosion of the Luhwaika Main and West reefs. Artisanal mining activity has concentrated on this loose quartz rubble deposit which is easily accessible for mining. High grade quartz rubble has so far been identified in three areas: the Luhwaika West reef, the Luhwaika Main reef and the Luhwaika East area.  The Company completed a detailed bulk sampling program on this potentially economic quartz rubble bed.  Bulk Sampling Program  The Company initiated a pit bulk sampling campaign between September 2010 and February 2011. The nature of this exploration was the collection of composite channel sampling from the pit side walls as a way of providing an indication of the in-situ grade. The bulk sample itself was fed through a mobile modular


19


gravity separation plant located at the main camp. The extent of the exploration was on a small scale and included 43 excavated and channel sampled pit bulk samples. Only 18 of these pit bulk samples underwent the full excavation, channel sampling and pilot plant testing within the four month period. The objective of the pit bulk sampling campaign was to provide confidence in the gold grades for the already finalised resource model for the quartz rubble deposit and to ascertain the free gold recoverability using a rudimentary pilot plant as a low cost exercise.  The Company utilised an in-house geologist and field assistants to carry out the pit bulk sampling. Excavation was conducted with a small excavator and a single dump truck. Excavation was monitored by the geologist to ensure uniformity of the excavation and to stop the hole once the mottled zone had been reached. The mottled zone was also dug out as part of the bulk sample to a further depth of ~0.5m below the quartz rubble.  The location of the bulk sampling pits was defined by the then Senior VP, Mr. R. Van Der Westhuizen, based on the earlier RAB drilling and various other requirements. The pit co-ordinates were emailed to the field geologist who then located the pit using a hand-held GPS and staked the limits on an east-west orientation.  A 5.0m x 2.5m x 2.5m pit was measured out with tape and staked. The sizing of each pit was targeted to yield approximately 80t of bulk sample. No specific grid size or spacing was used for the pit location.  Luhwaika Prospect  Gold mineralization at the Luhwaika Prospect occurs in a series of sub-parallel and variably auriferous shear zones. The geological setting of the Luhwaika Gold Prospect shows many characteristics that are typical of classic mesothermal lode gold deposits.  At Luhwaika, two principal shear zones have been identified: the Luhwaika Main and Luhwaika West reefs. These reefs carry significant gold mineralization as evidenced by strike extensive small-scale mining and exploration shafts, and more recent drill results. The gold mineralization in the Luhwaika Main reef is structurally controlled, consisting mostly of lodes of laminated quartz veins impregnated in strongly sheared and altered quartz sericite schist with occasional massive tabular whitish-grey quartz vein blow-outs. These veins are shear hosted, with lesser extensional veins noted in outcrop in the granite host rock.  The Luhwaika West reef, located 100-200 metres in the hanging-wall and sub-parallel to the Luhwaika Main reef, consists mainly of shear-zone hosted tabular quartz veins that often contain irregular hematite filled fracture surfaces.  Igunda Prospect  The structural setting of the Igunda Gold Prospect is similar to that of the Luhwaika Prospect with the exception that the former is hosted in mafic greenstone rocks intruded by lenses of felsic granitoids including quartz-feldspar porphyry. At Igunda, two principal shear zones have been identified: the Igunda A and B reefs.Closely associated with the reefs are sub parallel quartz feldspar porphyry units.  Gold mineralization is structurally controlled and the Igunda Reefs are localized in two sub-vertical dipping northwest striking shear zones, dipping steeply (75o  85o) to the northeast. Gold mineralization also occurs in the host wall rock up to over a meter and is not confined to the veins.  Msonga Prospect  Drilling  The Msonga Prospect is situated in the far northeast of the Kigosi license area.  The earlier geochemical and structural studies covering this area had identified the presence of a substantial (7 km long) Au-in-soil anomaly hosted in mafic greenstone rocks. Dominant regional structures in the area (Ushirombo greenstone


20


belt) generally trend east-west and are associated with the development of swarms of auriferous quartz veins such as those being currently mined by small-scale miners in the Katente area at Ushirombo. The Msonga Prospect is located between 3-5km along strike from these artisanal workings, and as such it was considered conceivable that the Msonga Prospect represented a similar setting to the Igunda Prospect (i.e., a greenstone and shear zone hosted gold deposit).  During the period mid-2009 to early-2011, the Company conducted a single phase of widely spaced RAB drilling covering the 7km-long Au-in-soil anomaly outline. From early 2010 to June 2011, the Company conducted two phases of RC drilling. The first phase of RC drilling comprised short vertical RC drill-holes mainly investigating the areas potential for gold mineralization in a distinctive auriferous surficial lateritic quartz rubble deposit. The second phase of RC drilling comprised inclined RC drill-holes to mainly investigate the east-west strike extension of the auriferous quartz veins associated with the nearby Katente Prospect. A total of 148 inclined RC holes were drilled on the Msonga Prospect.  Subsequent modelling and krigging was conducted on the deposit. However, no mineral resources could be declared for Msonga Prospect due to the very low average grade, the paucity of sampling and a lack of geological control for mineralisation. The current targets at Msonga prospect are therefore, classified as minor gold occurrences only.  Kigosi Exploration History  From 1998 to 2007, the Company and AngloGold-Ashanti conducted regional and detailed exploration work on the Kigosi Project Area including airborne magnetics, soil sampling, mapping and trenching. The aeromagnetic survey flown in 1999 covered the entire Ushirombo greenstone belt and parts of the Miyabi-Kigosi greenstone belt. Limited field work was conducted by the Company during this initial period including a helicopter visit to the Luhwaika artisanal site which included grab sampling and mapping.  In June 2002, the Company sent a team to investigate the Luhwaika and Igunda showings at which time a more thorough grab sampling program was conducted. Positive results from this sampling led to further sampling and a small mapping program was initiated. A Landsat and radiometric investigation was also conducted on the Kigosi Project Area in 2003.  AngloGold-Ashanti conducted a detailed airborne survey in 2003 that covered the eastern Kigosi licenses. A soil sampling program was also conducted as part of initial follow-up work on prospective aeromagnetic anomalies which were later classified as the Msonga, Bungoni, Luhwaika and Igunda prospect areas. AngloGold-Ashanti conducted limited trenching at both Luhwaika and Igunda.  The Company has incurred total net costs (after recoveries, if any) of $301,890 on the Kigosi Project for the year ended August 31, 2014.  The Kigosi Project is without known mineral reserves and any exploration program is an exploratory search for ore.   Lunguya Project Area  Property Description and Location  The Lunguya Property is located in the Kahama District of Tanzania. The Lunguya Property is situated in the Lake Victoria Greenstone Belts, approximately 100 kms by air to the southwest of Mwanza and about 15 kms south of Bulyanhulu.  With respect to Lunguya PL 1766/01 in January, 2003, a Shareholders Agreement was entered into wherein a new company, Lunguya Mining Company Limited (LMC), was created to form a joint venture between Northern Mining and Consultancy Company Limited (NMCCL), Tanzam and LMC.  Tanzam has a 60% shareholding and NMCCL has the remaining 40% shareholding in LMC.


21


In February 2010, the Company entered into an Option and Royalty Agreement with Joseph Magunila and Partners (JMP) over an area in the Kahama District of the Shinyanga Region in Tanzania 100% owned by JMP.  The agreement grants the Company an option to acquire up to 90% of JMPs interest and/or, at the sole discretion of the Company, to enter into a mining and exploration services agreement.  The Company paid US$90,000 for this option.  Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography  The Lunguya Property can be reached by plane from Mwanza to an airstrip accommodating Bulyanhulu or by road via Geita up to the Bulyanhulu/Kahama road intersection. From Kahama, the property is located approximately 8 kms to the south, toward Lunguya village. Secondary roads and trails traverse the property. The Nyamakwenge Reef, located in the northeastern part of the property, can be accessed using a 12 kms dirt tract passing to the north of the property.  Climate and elevation are similar to the Luhala Property.  Very little outcrop (less than 1%) has been identified at Lunguya.  The entire property is flat and covered largely by granitic sands and grey orange laterities derived from granitic sources.  Like Luhala, Lunguya is actively cultivated, but also is being actively mined by a few score artisanal miners along the trend of the Nyamakwenge Reefs.  No significant infrastructure, power or water is available on site.  However, the entire infrastructure of the region including electricity, air transport, health clinics, schools, and improved road networks, have been greatly improved due to the proximity to Barricks Bulyanhulu mine, some 20 kms to the north.  History  The project was acquired by the Company in 2001 and a program of BLEG sampling, geological mapping, rock sampling, RC and diamond drilling was initiated.  Geology  The very limited outcrop exposures on the Lunguya concession necessitate development of a geological and interpretive environment largely based on geophysical interpretations.  Regionally, Lunguya is located near the eastern terminus of the inner volcanic arc, lower Nyanzian, of the Sukumaland Greenstone belt.  The succession is dominated by tholeiitic volcanic rocks containing lesser felsic tuffaceous rocks and argillaceous horizons cut by thin quartz porphyry dykes and sills.  The thick, banded iron formation and felsic flows characteristic of the outer arc Upper Nyanzian sequence are absent. Most of the map scale granite  greenstone contacts strike north-south.  No information is available with respect to the orientation of sub-surface contacts.  At Lunguya, all currently known, auriferous structural zones track at an oblique angle, the eastern granodiorite-mafic volcanic contact.  Auriferous veins strike at 020° to 030° with the dominant intrusive volcanic contact trending at approximately 360°.  On the property scale, two 330° trending fault  structures are interpreted to offset the Lunguya vein into two fault repeated vein segments, having strike lengths of  approximately 180 and 300 m.  A few score artisanal miners have exploited these veins to a depth not exceeding 30 vertical metres subsurface. A second set of auriferous reefs, the Nyikoboko Reefs, are located 12 kilometres to the south. This area is associated with a smaller set of largely inactive artisanal dumps and workings.  Based on the aeromagnetic data a model has been proposed whereby a large NS trending shear zone is believed to exist below a thick black cotton soil (mbuga) cover. The thin veins associated with the Nyikoboko and Nyamakwengwe reefs probably represent secondary structures from the main shear. This idea has been tested using biogeochemistry.


22


Mineralization  Lunguya is a mineralized brittle ductile strain zone, developing internal to a major granite-greenstone contact. Gold is associated with one fault offset vein which is likely broken into two segments, the Western and Eastern reefs.  Lesser veins are also present.  Initial sampling of artisanal vein waste dumps indicated the presence of well mineralized dump samples.  The site contained greater than 200 of these small pits-shafts ranging from 1 to 20 metres deep.  Diamond drill and RC programs at Lunguya have demonstrated geological continuity of the Nyamakwenge West and East Reefs but weaker continuity of grade.  The difficulty in obtaining representative gold grades from small core samples of vein material containing coarse particulate gold is a well documented phenomenon. Widths in these boreholes are approximately true widths and the boreholes have been collared roughly perpendicular to the strike and dip of the mineralized structural zones.  Exploration  In November 2010, the Company announced positive results from laboratory test work on surface quartz rubble collected from its Lunguya Primary Mining Licenses (PMLs) in northern Tanzania.  The laboratory test work was intended to establish the mineralogical (physical) characteristics of gold contained within an extensive auriferous (gold bearing) quartz rubble bed identified at Lunguya, along with suitable gravity-based recovery methods to extract gold from the quartz rubble which is essentially broken and fractured surface rock.  Chemical analysis of sample material returned values of 3.58g/t, 5.75g/t, 2.33g/t and 3.31g/t, giving an average "head grade" for gold of 3.74g/t. (The "head grade" refers to the average grade of the material submitted for processing and analysis).  Bulk samples were collected from random pits within the Lunguya PML in February 2010.  RC drilling began at Lunguya in June 2011. The program was intended to confirm evidence of reef mineralization identified during the 2002 RC and diamond drilling program in the area.  A total of 14 drill holes consisting of 1,247m were completed during the month. A number of narrow, parallel, moderate dipping shear structures hosted in granite were intersected.  The shears are possibly related to those hosting gold mineralization in the area.  The RC drilling program continued at Lunguya in August 2011, demonstrating the continuity of Nyamakwenge reefs to the southwest of the prospect. Two sets of quartz vein in sheared granite were identified during the drilling program in 2002, with their thickness ranging from 1  8m thick. During 2011 RC program another two sets of quartz reefs were identified, with their thickness ranging from 2 to 20m. These two new sets of quartz reef have similar characteristics with the first sets of quartz veins identified.  A study was completed for the Lunguya project. For additional information regarding the Lunguya Property the reader is referred to the complete text of a technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 dated February 8, 2010, entitled, Report on the Lunguya Mineral Exploration Property of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation in the Kahama District, Shinyanga Region of the United Republic of Tanzania, East Africa by Martin J. Taylor, P.Geo.  The Preliminary Lunguya Report is available online at www.sedar.com, filed on February 16, 2010 under the heading, Technical Report (NI 43-101).  During the period ended August 31, 2014, no direct property work was conducted on the Lunguya property.  The Company has deferred total net costs (after any recoveries and write offs) of $3,811 on the Lungua Property for the year ended August 31, 2014.  The Lunguya Property is without known mineral reserves and any exploration program is an exploratory search for ore..


23


Itetemia Property  Property Description and Location  The Itetemia Property is located in the Mwanza Region of the Lake Victoria Greenstone Region, Tanzania, approximately 90 kilometres by air southwest of the city of Mwanza, situated on the south shore of Lake Victoria.  Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography  The property is accessed via local roads from Geita or by plane from Mwanza to an airstrip accommodating the neighbouring Bulyanhulu Mine, owned by Barrick.  The Barrick airstrip is 3.75 km west of the western boundary of the Itetemia prospecting license, and approximately 4 km northeast of the Nyamykonze village. Local resources are available at Mwanza, located on the southern shore of Lake Victoria.  The topography in the region and on the property consists of large flat-lying areas surrounded by numerous small hills. The hills have elevations of up to 100 m above local terrain.  The hills are thickly vegetated and access is only possible along cut lines.  Little outcrop exists on the property. The climate is similar to the rest of the region.  The rainy season starts in November and lasts to the middle of April, but precipitation is irregular from one season to another. The dry seasons are usually hot. Mwanza, located along the southern shore of Lake Victoria, can, and has, provided limited supplies for mining and exploration operations in the area.  Dwellers in the area of the Itetemia Project, such as the neighbouring Nyamykonze village, are traditionally subsistence farmers and ranchers, and have limited mining experience from the Bulyanhulu operation and numerous small scale activities.  Water for the purpose of mining and processing is not readily available in the region; however, a pipeline from Lake Victoria built by Barrick for its Bulyanhulu Mine, provides an adequate supply.  The large, relatively flat terrain surrounding the known gold mineralization may be suitable for potential tailings and waste rock storage and for heap leach pads and a potential processing plant. Electric power is available via the national grid within 5 km; due to the unreliability of such power, alternative forms of residual or back-up power would be necessary for mining or processing operations, such as diesel power generation used by Barrick at its Bulyanhulu mine.  Ownership  Prior Ownership  With respect to one Itetemia prospecting license, the interest of the Company was acquired from Stamico pursuant to a joint venture agreement dated July 12, 1994 (the Stamico Venture Agreement).  The Stamico Venture Agreement obligated the Company to make two initial payments of TSh$1,000,000 and US$7,200 to Stamico, both of which were satisfied.  The Companys Interest  Through prospecting and mining option agreements, the Company has options to acquire interests in several Itetemia Property prospecting licenses.  The prospecting licenses comprising the Itetemia Property are indirectly held by the Company through the Companys subsidiaries, Tancan or Tanzam. In the case of one prospecting license, Tancan acquired its interest pursuant to the Stamico Venture Agreement, as amended June 18, 2001 and July 2005, which provides, among other things, that:  1. Tancan had to pay Stamico, on execution of the Stamico Venture Agreement, the sum of US$7,200 (as an advance against the 2% gross revenue royalty) and TSh1,000,000.


24


2. Tancan and Stamico were to form a joint venture company for the purpose of holding the prospecting license that shall be held 10% by Stamico (with no obligation to contribute) and 90% by Tancan, which was effected through the formation of Itetemia Mining Co.  3. Stamico is entitled to acquire an additional 20% interest in the joint venture company by paying a sum equal to 20% of the cost of placing the property into commercial production based on the feasibility study, if and when submitted to the Government of Tanzania for such purpose.  4. Tancan shall assist Stamico in raising the required capital to exercise the right referred to in (3) above.  5. Tancan was to expend the sum of US$25,000 in the first year and US$50,000 annually thereafter in relation to the training of Tanzanian personnel.  6. Upon commencement of commercial production, Stamico shall receive a 2% gross revenue royalty, which shall be increased to a 2.5% gross revenue royalty should a mine on the Itetemia prospecting license produce recoverable gold in excess of 12 grams per tonne.  7. Tancan shall pay to Stamico, as an advance against the 2% gross revenue royalty, the sum of US$7,200 on or before every anniversary of the Stamico Venture Agreement up until the development phase, upon and after which the annual sum of US$10,000 shall be paid as an advance against such royalty.  8. Tancan shall show preference to Stamico for the provision of local materials and services during the period of mining operations.  9. As amended July 2005, Tancan had to pay to Stamico the sum of US$15,000 on or before July 12 of 2006 and 2007,and ending upon commercial production, provided that commercial production commences by December 31, 2007, failing which the aforementioned payment shall be revisited.  As expected, commercial production did not commence by December 31, 2007.  In 2008, the annual option fee was renegotiated to US$25,000 per annum until commercial production.  10. Tancan may assign its rights under the agreement, subject to the prior written consent of Stamico.  The Itetemia prospecting licences are adjacent to Barricks Bulyanhulu gold mine.  History  The exploration history of the Itetemia Property from 2006 to 2014 is summarized as follows:


25


Itetemia Exploration History Synopsis


|          |                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|--------- | ----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Year      | Operator          | Work Performed                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2006      | Tancan            | In-house evaluation. 4-hole diamond drill program                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2007      | Sloane            | Planned 2000 m RC drill program and 3000 m infill diamond drilling program.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2008      | Sloane            | First phase drill program consisted of 10 Reverse Circulation (RC) aggregating 1,489 metres.  Eight diamond drill holes were drilled totalling 2,286.5 metres.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2009      | Sloane            | Data analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2010      | Sloane            | Data analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2011-2012 | Company           | NI 43-101 report prepared by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2013      | Company           | In-house evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2014      | Tanzanian Royalty | Digital Terrain Model (DTM) survey pickups using GPS to create topographical survey over the resource area for resource modelling, completion of study, which was contracted to MaSS Resources Company Ltd., submission of the Final Itetemia Gold Project (IGP) Study by MaSS Resources company, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study on the Itetemia Gold Project (IGP), which was contracted to Efficient Consultants environmental experts. The EIA study is ongoing and completed activities include - Visit to site, conducting consultative meetings with stake holders, consultation with OSHA officials & Lake zone mines officer, project registration with NEMC, submission of brief project report to NEMC for project screening, preparation of Scoping Project Report and Terms of Reference (ToR) for management approval before submission and the submission of the Scoping Report to NEMC for approval.

Geology  The Lake Victoria area contains 12 Archean Nyanzian greenstone belts which are surrounded by and have been interrupted by numerous granitic intrusions.  The Nyanzian belts comprise a volcano-sedimentary sequence composed of mafic to felsic volcanics (lavas and tuffs), BIF and shales. The greenstone belts have been grouped into locally distinct geographic regions.  One of these regions is the Southwest Mwanza Region which includes a large area south of the town of Mwanza, located on the south shore of Lake Victoria.  There are five greenstone belts in the Southwest Mwanza Region, one of which is the Ushirombo belt. The Ushirombo belt is an east-west trending belt, the eastern end of which is located approximately 25 km west of the southern end of Smith Sound on Lake Victoria. The eastern end of the belt is arcuate in shape and trends northerly tangential to the northwestern flank of the Siga Hills.  The Itetemia Property is underlain by the northerly trending eastern portion of the Ushirombo Nyanzian greenstone belt.  Granite underlies the eastern and northern portions of the property.  The greenstone/granite contact trends northerly through the east-central portion of the Itetemia prospecting license and through the central portion of the Itetemia East prospecting license onto the Itetemia Village license; at which point, the contract tends westerly through the Mwingilo license cutting the northeast corner of the Ngula license. Sixty percent of the Itetemia, Itetemia North and Ngula licenses are underlain by the Nyanzian greenstone belt.  The remaining 40% is underlain by granite.  Granite variably underlies 90 to 100% of the Itetemia East, Itetemia Village and Mwingilo prospecting licenses. The Mbuga soil covers 10 to 40% of the property.


26


Mineralization  The sulphide mineralization encountered on the Itetemia Property comprises massive to semi-massive, stringers, veins and veinlets, disseminated and nodular mineralization.  The types of mineralization are (i) sulphides associated with volcanism activity; (ii) remobilized sulphides associated with deformation (shear hosted); and (iii) sulphides associated with sedimentation.  The gold and metallic contents associated with this mineralization are variable and the relation between the grades and the mineralized type is not well known at this stage.  The massive to semi-massive sulphide mineralization seems to be related to volcanism.  It occurs in two areas on the Property.  One area is located in the northern part of the licenses and has been intersected by the hole ITDD-06.  More than 30 m. of sulphides were intersected at the contact between a QFP and an argillite horizon separating two pillowed basalts.  The sulphide content ranges from 10 to 90% pyrrhotite, 2 to 5% pyrite, trace to 5% sphalerite, trace to 1% copper.  The Golden Horseshoe Reef mineralization occurs as massive sulphide veins locally ranging from 15-30 cm wide.  Sulphides dominantly appear in veins/veinlets less than 5 cm wide in felsic volcanic rocks.  Five to thirty percent pyrite-pyrrhotite is common over sections of 1 to 15 m along the holes.  They are sub-concordant and parallel to the schistosity.  The strong shearing at the Golden Horseshoe Reef probably represents a remobilization of the sulphides.  Exploration  The majority of the exploration work in 2007 consisted of RC and diamond drilling, along with limited ground geophysics.  Exploration crews were mobilized to the Itetemia Project in August 2007 and drilling commenced in mid-September.  The first phase drill program completed 10 RC holes aggregating 1,489 metres and eight diamond drill holes totaling 2,286.5 metres.  The drill program targeted the shallowest part of the previously established Golden Horseshoe Reef with a view to developing an open pit resource with a notional floor level of 200 metres below surface.  In support of preparation of a resource estimate, drill holes were sited to provide data at grid points at or below 50 x 50 metres spacing.  A number of deeper holes were also sited to test the extent of the mineralized body at depth and along strike.  The Company is reviewing various alternatives for advancing its Itetemia project. Previous studies have indicated that the Golden Horseshoe Reef (GHR) represents a small, yet robust, medium-grade, near surface gold deposit that warrants further feasibility investigations. A Technical Report dated January 31, 2012 (the Itetemia and Luhala Technical Report) shows the potential of a small opencast operation, at high gold prices. At lower gold prices, studies show some potential for toll treating the GHR material at the neighbouring Bulyanhulu Mine.  The Itetemia and Luhala Technical Report also includes a Resource Summary for the GHR. Based on a 1.0g/t Au cut-off grade, Itetemia has an Indicated Mineral Resource of 2.80  million tons  grading 2.96g/t Au containing 266,000 ounces of gold.  The Itetemia Project concept study positively demonstrated that the chosen cut-off grade of 0.5g/t Au supports not just reasonable but actual, prospects for economic extraction. The original Mineral Resource estimate was published at 1.0g/t Au but this included areas of lower grade which had to be mined in order to access the entire orebody. By lowering the cut-off grade to 0.5g/t Au, it has become possible to incorporate this material into both the Indicated and Inferred categories, effectively making the orebody more continuous and practical to mine. Comparison with the previous Mineral Resource statement indicates a 5% increase in the total tonnage at a 4% reduction in mean grade, resulting in an overall 1% increase in the contained gold. The prospects for economic extraction at 1.0g/t Au and 0.5g/t Au were clearly demonstrated by the concept study.  For additional information regarding the Itetemia Property see the Technical Report entitled National Instrument 43-101F on the Itetemia and Luhala Gold Projects in the Lake Victoria Greenstone Belt,


27


Tanzania prepared for the Company by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited and compiled by A.N. Clay, N. McKenna, and R.M. Tayelor dated January 31, 2012 and filed on SEDAR February 1, 2012.  During the period ended August 31, 2014, no direct property work was conducted on the Itetemia property.  The Company has incurred total net costs (after any recoveries and write offs) of $69,568 on the Itetemia Property for the year ended August 31, 2014.  The Itetemia Property is without known mineral reserves and any exploration program is an exploratory search for ore.   Luhala Property  Property Description and Location  The Luhala property is located in Misungwi District of Mwanza Region of Tanzania.  It lies approximately 70 kilometres south of the city of Mwanza.  The Luhala prospecting licenses are in good standing with respect to required filings and payments with the Government of Tanzania.  The target on the Luhala property is gold stockwork mineralization associated with felsic rock units in dilatational structures.  Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography  Access to the Luhala Property is via the main Mwanza  Shinyanga road, which is a single lane, good to excellent quality, asphalt highway.  Approximately 45 kms south of Mwanza, a dirt road from a junction at the settlement of Manawa, leads southwest to the town of Misasi.  The property has year round access, although seasonal winter rains, December to March, may result in flooding in low lying areas which are dominated by mbuga (black organic rich laustrine flood soils).  Most lowland areas are under active cultivation, corn, rice, beans and mixed crops, by subsistence farmers.  Low scrub and thorn bushes cover the small hills.  The area has been, for many years, deforested by local agricultural practices.  At Luhala, the mean elevation is approximately 1,200 m above sea level, with a series of small sub-rounded hills, rising up to one hundred metres above the surrounding plain.  These hills are typically formed by either resistive iron formations or felsic volcanic rocks.  Mafic volcanic rocks weather recessively and are typically only exposed in trenches through well formed laterite profiles.  Laterite development is extensive with brick-red laterites overlying weak mottled zones and saprolites at a depth of approximately 3-5 metres.  Deep weathering penetrates 45 - 60 metres vertically within the subsurface.  An enthusiastic and competent labor force is available through the surrounding villages, and local people have been routinely hired during the trenching, drilling and soil sampling programs conducted on this property.  However, no other significant infrastructure is available.  History  Luhala has had a significantly more protracted exploration history than Lunguya, beginning with the initial exploration by the then Tanganyikan Geological Survey in 1947.  The exploration history of Luhala since 2006 to 2014 is summarized as:


28


LUHALA EXPLORATION HISTORY SYNOPSIS  YearOperatorWork Performed2006TancanDiamond drilling, RC drilling2007SloaneFollow-up exploration planning2008SloaneData analysis2009SloaneData analysis2010SloaneData analysis2011-2012CompanyNI 43-101 report prepared by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd.2013CompanyIn-house evaluation2014CompanyContinued in-house evaluation  Geology  Luhala is found within the eastern portion of the Buhungukira Belt, a local place name assigned to one of the eight greenstone belts in the Lake Victoria District.  These rocks are believed to be the eastern continuation of the Geita Greenstone Belt and consist of dominantly Upper Nyanzian rock sequences.  In the Luhala area, the predominant structural grain is dominated by an early deformational event which has deformed all supracrustal rocks into tight, south to southwest plunging, west overturned, synforms and antiforms.  The short limbs of these folds may have east-west strikes and modest, 40 degree south dips. The long limbs of these folds have north to northeast strikes and generally much steeper, 60  80 degree, and east dips.  At Luhala, three principal mineralized zones have been identified. These include Kisunge Hill, Shilalo South, and Shilalo West.  All of the three principal mineralized areas are linked by a common southwest plunging antiform, the limbs of which are separated by 500 to 800 metres and converge just south of Line 6200 E and 3800 N.  Mineralization to Kisunge Hill is associated with a chert  felsic volcanic contact.  As Shilalo South, structurally controlled gold mineralization closely tracks the position of a massive to locally well-bedded chert or cherty iron formation.  The results of diamond drilling in Shilalo West strongly outline the importance of the felsic volcanic - chert  structural sites and gold association.  For example, borehole LSD  08A is collared in the hangingwall to the Shilalo West mineralized zone, traverses the host rhyolite-chert lithology, and terminates in the footwall.  This borehole intersected significant gold mineralization of 3.55 g/t Au over 5 m near the hangingwall contact of the felsic volcanic rocks, and is mineralized repeatedly at over one gram ranges throughout much of the felsic host interval, which in this borehole is over 35 metres thick.  The felsic volcanic rock package at Shilalo West once again presents an excellent structural site for the development of dilatant sites and gold mineralization.  As of Shilalo South, a well defined planar, brittle-ductile structural zone was not identified at Shilalo West.  Gold distribution is likely related to the presence of extensional and shear extensional veinlets, which are developed within the felsic volcanic rocks at or near, the felsic volcanic red tuff contact.  Exploration  During the period ended August 31, 2014, no site-based exploration work was conducted on the Luhala Property.


29


At Luhala, three principal mineralized zones have been identified: Kisunge Hill, Shilalo South, and Shilalo West.  Gold mineralization is associated with zones of diffuse silicification, localized around small scale fractures within competent chert and felsic volcanic rock units.  Mineralization  At Luhala, gold mineralization is associated with zones of diffuse silicification, localized around small cm and mm scale fractures within competent chert and felsic volcanic rock units.  Major discordant vein structures are not identified and planar high strain zones are absent.  No specific gravity data have been calculated for any of the rocks cored in these intervals and without strong cross sectional control, no reliable resource estimates for any of the principal mineralized zones at Kisunge, Shilalo South and Shilalo West may be calculated.  Historical Drilling  The Phase 7 drill program at Luhala was completed in August 2006 and consisted of nine diamond drill holes aggregating 991 metres.  All the holes tested the eastern limb of the Kisunge Main Zone. Among the better intercepts reported from this program was 3.07 metres grading 6.87 g/t. Within this intercept was a 1.44 metres interval averaging 10.95 g/t. Invaluable structural information was obtained from the Phase 7 diamond drilling program which will be utilized in the planning process for follow-up exploration.  For additional information regarding the Luhala Property see the Technical Report entitled National Instrument 43-101F on the Itetemia and Luhala Gold Projects in the Lake Victoria Greenstone Belt, Tanzania prepared for the Company by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Limited and compiled by A.N. Clay, N. McKenna, and R.M. Tayelor dated January 31, 2012 and filed on SEDAR February 1, 2012 (the Itetemia and Luhala Technical Report).  The Company has incurred total net costs of $9,368 and written off $377,511 of expenditures on the Luhala Property for the year ended August 31, 2014.  The Luhala Property is without known mineral reserves and any exploration program is an exploratory search for ore.   Kabanga Project  Property Description and Location  The Kabanga project is located in north western Tanzania, south of Lake Victoria and near the Burundi and Rwanda borders within the Mesoproterozoic Karagwe-Ankolean sequence within the Kibaran Fold Belt of NW Tanzania and is owned 75% Northwestern Basemetals Company Limited, 15% by Stamico and 10% by Songshan.  Northwestern Basemetals Company Limited, a subsidiary company of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation is engaged in the exploration and development of the Kagera Nickel project, adjacent to the Barrick/Xstrata Kabanga Nickel Project within the Kabanga-Musongati mafic-ultramafic belt, which contains Ni sulphide ores at Kabanga deposit and reef-type PGE concentrations at Musongati. The project portfolio consists of 32 granted prospective licenses (PLs) totalling 2350.45 square kilometres in area. In addition, the Company holds 18 applications for PLs covering 1563.14 square kilometres.  History  From1992 to 1993 BHP Billiton conducted regional and detailed exploration work on the Kabanga Project Area including airborne magnetics; soil sampling, mapping and stream sediment sampling which covered a broad north-northeast trending strip of ground some 220km long and up to 60km wide.


30


From 1993 to 1997 BHP Billiton conducted a follow-up with considerable exploration on targeted aeromagnetic anomalies.  In 2000, an interpretation of the regional aeromagnetic survey of the greater Kabanga Ni belt was carried out as part of the Companys regional exploration programme.  In 2004, with a Nickel price rise forecast, the Company applied for open ground on the stratigraphy that favours these magnetic anomalies  Geology  Weakly metamorphosed sedimentary formations of the mid-Proterozoic Karagwe  Ankolean Supergroup underlie this region in extreme northwestern Tanzania, and forms part of the northerly trending Kibaran Orogenic Belt. This orogenic belt extends from Zambia in the south, through the DRC, Burundi, Rwanda and NW Tanzania, into Uganda in the north. To the east this belt is in structural contact with the late-Proterozoic Bukoban Supergroup, a sequence of younger, essentially unmetamorphosed sediments.  The thick (+10 km) sedimentary sequence of the Karagwe  Ankolean Supergroup consists of massive to well-bedded sandstones and interbedded laminated shales and siltstones, now metamorphosed to quartzites, phyllites and mica schists. The K-A strata are moderately folded and can be mapped out for many kilometres, and are divided into Upper, Middle and Lower Divisions, each with characteristic marker units referred to as the q1, q2 and q3 quartzites. Later quartz reefs (veins) of metamorphic segregation origin are common.  The belt is characterised by early intrusions of mafic sill-like bodies at ~1400 Ma that are the host rocks to the nickel mineralisation, and are interbedded within the folded meta-sediments. These mafic-ultramafic intrusions form the complex Kabanga  Musongati  Kapalagulu igneous belt, reflected in the Kagera region as an elongate zone of airborne magnetic anomalies. Extensive bodies (sheets) of gabbroic magma were intruded later, towards the end of the main period of folding. A-type granitoids were intruded at a ~1250 Ma and post-orogenic Sn granites around 1000 Ma, which have developed contact aureoles. There is a range of much younger deposits including old land-surface terrace deposits, laterite, mbuga, alluvium and seasonal swamp. In the northeast a considerable area is blanketed by recent surface deposits; similar deposits overlie low ground along the Lake Ihema shoreline in the west.  Exploration  6,791 biogeochemistry (BGC) samples have been collected. A total of 4490 samples were sent to the BGC Preparation Laboratory at Buckreef exploration camp for preparation by drying at 70 degree celcius for 12 hours, sieving and grinding. 3476 samples were shipped at 100g of the pulps to ACME Analytical Laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for Mult Element analysis using Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP  MS) to detect a 53 elements suite within the collected tissue samples after proper laboratory preparation by controlled ashing and then placing the sample material on an aqua regia digestion.  The Buhamila area was initially targeted because of both its relative proximity to the Companys Exploration camp at Buckreef in the Geita Destrict, making it an ideal test case for long range intermediate duration prospecting surveys. Furthermore, the Company conducted an aeromagnetic survey of the entire Kabanga corridor in northwestern Tanzania in the 1990s, and such data would act as a validation check on some of our large-scale findings due to the ferromagnetic characteristics of Ni and Co. Lastly, because of the nearly complete lack of other (non-Ni) geochemical exploration data for the region, our rapid mineral exploration capabilities inherent in BGC surveys (Woolman, Yi 2013) would provide excellent exploratory value on a cost-per-observation metric relative to other large-scale prospecting methods.  Mineralization  In summary the Kabanga nickel deposit is hosted within sill-like ultramafic to mafic intrusions and pipe-


31


like bodies and breccias that form part of the complex Kabanga  Musongati  Kapalagulu igneous belt. Various reports indicate that individual igneous bodies are up to 1 km thick and 4 km long, and formed from several distinct primary magmas pulses (picritic to basaltic in composition) into sulphide-bearing phyllitic sediments. In the Kabanga area the intrusions contain abundant sulphides which form massive layers and lenses in places. Local remobilisation of sulphides occurred late during the Kibaran Orogeny and formed rich sulphide-hornfels breccias. In part these intrusions are considered to be chonolithic  pipe-like mafic/ultramafic intrusions that were emplaced by early structural controls, and which may host significant ore. The concept of an early structural control at the Kabanga Ni and other deposits deserves to be investigated further.  The main Kabanga mineralisation is located between the Upper Division and Middle Divisions and is associated with a marked aeromagnetic low more than 1000 m long and over 300 m wide, and is coincident with a strong Ni geochemical anomaly. This anomaly lies at the southern end of a 200 km-long, north-trending zone of aeromagnetic anomalies  interpreted as the prime zone of exploration interest  and provides a focus for on-going Ni exploration. The Upper, Middle and Lower Divisions of the Supergroup are reported to have definitive aeromagnetic signatures which makes regional stratigraphic correlation relatively easy.  The Company has written off all costs incurred to date for Kabanga nickel and management will review all remaining licences for future continuity or abandonment as they come due.  The Kabanga Property is without known mineral reserves and any exploration program is an exploratory search for ore.


32


SIGNATURE  The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F/A and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.   Date March 31, 2015  TANZANIAN ROYALTY EXPLORATION CORPORATION    By:/s/ James E. SinclairJames E. Sinclair,President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


33