Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices 54377 

PERFORMANCE MEASURES DATA—Continued 

Provide Data on an Annual Basis for the Previous Calendar Year by March 31 of Each Year 

D. No. of Contract Employee DART Injuries/ 

Illnesses***.

1st Qtrllllll 

2nd Qtr llllll 

3rd Qtr llllll 

4th Qtr llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

E. Company Employee Hours Worked ........... 1st Qtrllllll 

2nd Qtr llllll 

3rd Qtr llllll 

4th Qtr llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

F. Contract Employee Hours Worked ............. 1st Qtrllllll 

2nd Qtr llllll 

3rd Qtr llllll 

4th Qtr llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

llllll 

ENVIRONMENT 

G. No. of EPA NPDES Noncompliances ................................................................ lllllllll 

H. For Oil Spills < 1 bbl 

1. No. of Spills ........................................................................................... lllllllll 

2. Total Volume for Spills .......................................................................... lllllll bbl 

* Please list all operator codes that these data represent. 

** Drilling Operations include Drilling, Workover, and Allied Services. 

*** Formerly Lost Time Cases that include Days Away from work, Restricted duty and Transfer situations. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA): The PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires us to inform you that BOEMRE collects this information to 

carry out its responsibilities under the OCS Lands Act, as amended. The BOEMRE will use the information to evaluate the effectiveness of industry’s continued improvement of safety and environmental management in the OCS. Responses are voluntary. No proprietary data are collected. We estimate the public reporting burden, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing 

and reviewing the information to average 10 hours per response. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (0MB) control number. The 0MB 

has approved this collection of information and assigned 0MB control number 1010–0112. You may direct comments regarding the burden 

estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Mail Stop 5438, Bureau of Ocean 

Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. 

COMPANY-SPECIFIC DATA COLLECTED UNDER THIS REQUEST IS INTENDED FOR GOVERNNENT USE ONLY 

BOEMRE Form MMS–131 (Mo/Year Replaces all previous editions that may not be used.) 

[FR Doc. 2010–22186 Filed 9–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Cattle Point Road Relocation; Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement; San 

Juan Island National Historical Park; 

San Juan County, WA; Notice of 

Availability 

Summary: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. 

L. 91–190, as amended), and the 

Council on Environmental Quality 

Regulations (40 CFR part 1500–1508), 

the National Park Service (NPS), and the 

Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA), Department of Transportation, 

co-lead agencies for this project, in 

cooperation with San Juan County, 

Washington and the Washington State 

Department of Natural Resources, have 

prepared a draft environmental impact 

statement (DEIS) for alternatives 

designed to respond to coastal bluff 

erosion which threatens Cattle Point 

Road located in San Juan Island 

National Historical Park (Park), 

Washington. The DEIS identifies and 

analyzes three ‘‘action’’ alternatives for 

road realignment that respond to agency 

planning requirements and to the 

public’s concerns and relevant 

environmental issues, identified during 

the scoping and early public 

involvement process. The potential 

environmental consequences of the 

alternatives, and appropriate measures 

to minimize or avoid harm, are 

identified and analyzed in the DEIS. An 

‘‘environmentally preferred’’ alternative 

is also identified. 

Background: A portion of the Cattle 

Point Road which terminates on the 

southeastern tip of San Juan Island is 

threatened by coastal erosion at the base 

of the slope traversed by the road. This 

road passes through the Park and serves 

residences on a peninsular area of the 

island known as Cattle Point, as well 

provides public access to the Cattle 

Point Natural Resource Conservation 

Area, managed by the Washington 

Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 

If erosion continues unabated, the 

roadway eventually will fail, disrupting 

vehicular access to these areas. The road 

is currently maintained by San Juan 

County (County); the project area of 

potential effect is primarily within the 

Park. The entire Park is listed on the 

National Register of Historic Places as a 

National Historic Landmark. 

A Notice of Intent to begin the 

conservation planning and 

environmental impact analysis for the 

project was published in the Federal 

Register on February 6, 2004. The NPS 

and the FHWA, along with the County 

and the DNR, organized an 

interdisciplinary team consisting of 

members from the four agencies. A 

previous scoping effort begun by the 

County in 2001 was incorporated into 

the current project. Public engagement 

was initiated through a newsletter and 

news release, followed by two public 

meetings held February 18, 2004, on 

San Juan Island. Project team members 

presented information and gathered 

feedback and ideas on preliminary 

alternatives and potential 

environmental issues. Approximately 30 

public comments were received during 

the scoping period ending March 19, 

2004. 

The project team subsequently 

developed a Scoping Report, which 

described the range of potential 

alternatives identified for more detailed 

analysis, as well as alternatives 

dismissed from further consideration 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
54378 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices 

(including armoring the base of the 

slope in lieu of road realignment 

options). The Scoping Report included 

comments and agency responses as 

appendices. On June 17, 2004, a notice 

was sent to the 302-member project 

mailing list regarding release of the 

Scoping Report; additionally, a press 

release was issued and a notice posted 

on the Park website announcing 

availability of the document. In April of 

2005, a newsletter was sent to the 

project mailing list summarizing 

progress on the DEIS to date, including 

the preliminary identification of a 

preferred alternative, completion of a 

Cultural Resource Survey and a Tunnel 

Feasibility Study, and plans for rare 

plant surveys. The project team made a 

presentation summarizing planning to 

date to the San Juan Board of County 

Commissioners in January, 2006; the 

meeting was open to the public. A plant 

survey report was also completed 

during January, 2006. Letters were sent 

to culturally affiliated tribes on March 9, 

2006, with copies of the Cultural 

Resource Survey and inviting their 

comments on the project. The FHWA, 

on behalf of the project team, sent a 

letter to the Washington State Historic 

Preservation Officer (SHPO) on May 28, 

2009, with a recommendation of No 

Adverse Effect and § 4(f) de minimis 

determination. Concurrence was 

received from the SHPO on June 23, 

2009. 

Proposal and Alternatives: Alternative 

A: No Action—The existing use, 

maintenance, and management 

associated with the road would 

continue without change. This 

alternative provides a baseline of 

current conditions to aid comparison 

and analysis of the ‘‘action’’ alternatives. 

Under this alternative, erosion 

eventually could cause the road to fail, 

disrupting vehicular access to 

residential properties in the Cattle Point 

Estates and Cape San Juan 

neighborhoods and to public lands east 

of the eroding bluff. Since 

measurements began in 2002, erosion 

has moved approximately 14 feet closer 

to the guard rail and is currently 32 feet 

from the guard rail at its closest point. 

The continued life span of the road is 

difficult to predict, however large storm 

events could potentially make the road 

unsafe in a few years—life expectancy 

(relative to coastal erosion) is estimated 

at approximately 100 years for each of 

the ‘‘action’’ alternatives. 

Alternative B: Hybrid Mid-Slope 

Realignment—This alternative is the 

‘‘agency preferred’’ alternative. It 

involves mid-slope realignment to the 

north of the existing road, traversing the 

south-facing slope of Mt. Finlayson. At 

its highest point, this alignment curves 

slightly south of the Mt. Finlayson 

summit. The realignment would be 

entirely on the surface (no tunnel), 

approximately 4,950 feet in length, with 

a short slope of 10.5% on the eastern 

end. This also is deemed to be the 

‘‘environmentally preferred’’ course of 

action. 

Alternative C: Long Tunnel on Minor 

Realignment—This alternative involves 

a short realignment (2,830 feet) 

relatively low on the slope of Mt. 

Finlayson. Sixteen hundred feet of the 

realignment would be within a bored 

tunnel. Maximum slope would be 7%. 

Alternative D: Mid-Slope Alignment 

with Short Tunnel—This alternative 

involves mid-slope realignment to the 

north of the existing road, utilizing a 

short tunnel near the ridgeline of Mt. 

Finlayson. Realignment length would be 

4,700 feet, 775 feet of which would be 

within the tunnel. Maximum slope 

would be 8%. 

Public Review and Comment: The 

DEIS is now available for public review. 

Copies may be obtained by contacting 

the Park as noted below. Printed copies 

of the document may also be reviewed 

at these locations in Friday Harbor on 

San Juan Island: San Juan County Public 

Library, San Juan County Office of 

Public Works, and at Park headquarters. 

The document may also be reviewed at 

Federal Highway Administration office 

in Vancouver, Washington. All written 

comments must be postmarked or 

transmitted not later than 60 days from 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of the Environmental 

Protection Agency’s notice of filing of 

the DEIS—as soon as this date is 

confirmed, it will be announced on the 

project website and via local and 

regional media. 

During the review period, several 

options are available for providing 

written comments. Letters can be 

directly mailed to: Superintendent Peter 

Dederich, San Juan Island National 

Historical Park, P.O. Box 429, Friday 

Harbor, WA 98250. In addition, 

comments may be hand-delivered at the 

upcoming public workshop to be 

conducted on San Juan Island. 

Confirmed details on the date, location, 

and time for the workshop will be 

announced in local newspapers, in the 

forthcoming DEIS Alternatives 

newsletter, online at the Park Web site 

(http://www.nps.gov/sajh), or may be 

obtained via telephone at (360) 378– 

2240. Comments may also be 

transmitted electronically on the NPS 

project Web site http// 

parkplanning.nps.gov/sajh. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Following the opportunity to review 

the DEIS, all comments received will be 

duly considered in preparing a Final 

EIS. The Final EIS is expected to be 

completed during the spring of 2011 

and availability of the document will be 

similarly announced in the Federal 

Register and via local and regional press 

media. 

Dated: April 5, 2010. 

Cicely A. Muldoon, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22145 Filed 9–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement; 

Stehekin River Corridor 

Implementation Plan; Lake Chelan 

National Recreation Area; Whatcom, 

Skagit and Chelan Counties, WA; 

Notice of Availability 

Summary: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

of 1969, the National Park Service, in 

cooperation with the Federal Highway 

Administration, has prepared a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement and 

Stehekin River Corridor Implementation 

Plan (Plan/DEIS). The Plan/DEIS 

evaluates four alternatives for 

sustainable management of NPS 

facilities (e.g., roads, maintenance yard, 

trails, bridges) in response to flooding 

and erosion issues on the lower 

Stehekin River between High Bridge and 

Lake Chelan, outside of the Stephen 

Mather Wilderness. When approved, the 

Plan will allow for implementation of 

several actions identified in the 1995 

General Management Plan (GMP), 

including removal of NPS maintenance 

and housing facilities and the primary 

access road to North Cascades National 

Park from the floodplain, construction 

of new recreation facilities, and 

protection of the water quality and 

scenery along the lower Stehekin River. 

The Plan/DEIS also updates the Lake 

Chelan National Recreation Area Land 

Protection Plan. 

Background: Lake Chelan National 

Recreation Area (LACH) encompasses 

62,000 acres of the rugged North 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1