alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Newly redesigned TF33 engine tested at Arnold AFBPublished Dec. 5, 2016
                        
                        By Deidre Ortiz
                        
                        
                        Arnold Engineering Development Center Public Affairs
                **ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE, Tenn. (AFNS) --**
                Testing of the TF33 Pratt and Whitney engine is being conducted at Arnold Engineering Development Center to verify and validate newly redesigned components of the engine.The TF33 has powered several different military airframes, including the Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, E-3 Sentry (AWACS) and the E-8 Joint STARS. Second Lt. Karlie Madden, the AEDC project manager for the test, stated that the engine currently being tested is a 17,000-pound thrust variant used aboard the B-52H Stratofortress airframe. “The testing at AEDC is to verify and validate the structural integrity and durability of a redesigned inlet case and turbine exhaust case,” she said. “The test also includes accelerated mission testing which simulates approximately one-half of an overhaul cycle of testing on the engine, running approximately 690 sea-level operating hours. Multiple performance calibrations have been performed to determine if there are any new performance standards that stem from the redesigned components.”The testing took place in one of the AEDC Engine Test Facility sea level test cells during the summer and wrapped up in November. The test was requested by the TF33 Systems Program Office of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Propulsion Directorate (AFLCMC/LPS) at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.Though tested at AEDC before, it was the first installation of the TF33 in this sea level test cell.The last TF33 test was conducted in the ETF C-2 test cell in 1995, during which AEDC characterized cold weather starting techniques between JP4 and JP8 jet fuel.Of the most recent test, James Burt, a TF33 equipment specialist with the AFLCMC/LPS, commented that working with AEDC on the TF33 accelerated mission testing proved to be an “outstanding experience.” “We have had no engine issues and all test cell issues were worked and resolved very quickly with little to no test down time,” he said. “This has resulted in the smoothest TF33 AMT test to date and allowed the test to complete ahead of schedule.”Testing was also completed early and 55 successful air periods were performed in 61 days, making the project successful both technically and financially.AFMC 



B-52 



KC-135 



Arnold AFB 



TF33 engine 



AEDC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             858
<SECURITIES>                                     1,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                      379
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,180
<PP&E>                                           2,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,453
<SALES>                                         10,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,333
<CGS>                                            6,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    483
<INCOME-TAX>                                       249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .064
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .062
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Dec. 2Published Dec. 2, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force the first Japanese F-35 arrives at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona; Edwards AFB in California is testing ways to save fueling cost for the C-17 Globemaster III; and the Air Force band performs at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- Band kicks off holiday season with 4th annual flash mob
- Final phase of C-17 drag reduction testing underwayF-35 



music 



Japan 



C-17 



Luke AFB 



Edwards AFB 



band 



ACC 



flash mob 



ATAF
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 243 

To provide assistance for watersheds adversely affected by qualifying natural 

disasters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To provide assistance for watersheds adversely affected by 

qualifying natural disasters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANCE. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) DISASTER COUNTY.—The term ‘‘disaster 

6 county’’ means— 

7 (A) a county included in the geographical 

8 area covered by a qualifying natural disaster 

9 declaration; and 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 243 IS

1 (B) each county contiguous to a county de2 scribed in subparagraph (A), when appropriate 

3 as determined by the Secretary. 

4 (2) QUALIFYING NATURAL DISASTER DECLARA5 TION.—The term ‘‘qualifying natural disaster dec6 laration’’ means a major disaster or emergency des7 ignated by the President under the Robert T. Staf8 ford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.). 

10 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

12 (b) ASSISTANCE.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Out of any funds in the 

14 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the Secretary 

15 of the Treasury shall transfer to the account used to 

16 carry out the emergency watershed protection pro17 gram established under section 403 of the Agricul18 tural Credit Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2203) 

19 $61,930,257, which the Secretary shall use to pro20 vide financial and technical assistance in disaster 

21 counties to project sponsors to address impaired wa22 tersheds under that program. 

23 (2) RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE.—The account 

24 described in paragraph (1) shall be entitled to re25 ceive, shall accept, and shall be used to carry out 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 243 IS

1 this section the funds transferred under paragraph 

2 (1), without further appropriation. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

wa are in rraalp 

ia whloh you robnit the 

for aa oplntonr 

WoulJ a trJs 3ohool Dlrraid trurtoe 

year ae trurClYil atetuter, 1925, 8# IO trurtea who cannot 

for #lx math8 prior to hlr 

rldl~ no perwn rhall ba purloo unlrro ho lo a proportf taxItttrlat to which ho lo olaotod 

l l q ua lifia d ‘voter in r a id dirIn our opinion No. o-425, wo ruled that it war 

na o ea wr y for l person to hold a poll tax rroript In orbe? 

to qualifT (t8 a sohool 6rartrr of a oornaoa rahool dirtriot. 

Thlr oplnlon 18 supported by numrou8 prior doola~0~8 by 

I thtr drpar6arnt. 
, 

.: 

Hon. B. Y. Whitware, Paga 2 

Thlr department rulrd in an opinion addressed to 

Honorable fin B. Dyer, dated April 20, 1935, Lottar Book, 

Volume 363, pagr 590, that the frllurr to obtain a poll tax 

rsoelpt for subrrqurnt years would not disqualify II trustrr 

who was duly qualified when aleotad to the oitloo of 00-n 

school trueteo. In that opinion it wes statod: 

wA poll tar 1s rssantlal before ons la 

qualified to hold this posltlon. Howover, it 

appoaro that Ylsa Terre11 at the tlmr of her 

l lootlon and at tho time Of quallrlcatlon was 

qasllflad in thlr rtspeot, and wa ars of tho 

opinion that her falling to obtain a poll tax 

for the year 1935 1s lsmatrrlal, and that rho 

1s still a duly quallrled and acting trustee 

insofar as the poll tax phare la concernad. 

Thr reason for this rule 1s apparent. xi euoh 

wsra not tha case, there would br a oonetant 

disorder on thr various boards by one lnadrertantly railing to obtain a poll tax. w 

A similar ruling was madr in an opinion to Honorable 

Wordlow Lena, dated April 18, 1935, Volums 363, page 323. 

i% have aonsldarsd the controlling rtatutes and the 

former opinions by this department, and are of the opinion 

that a school trustaa in a common school Qlstriot, slsctsd 

1~ 1939 and who mat all of ths requirements prasarlbed by 

Artlolo 2745 at ths time of his rlsotlon and qualification 

as such tru8teb, would not be dlsquallflrd and subject to 

repoval, by reason of his failure to pay his poll tax ror 

subsequent years during hla trr;r! of orfios. 

Very truly yourr 

Assls tant 

CCC/or 

APPROVEDMAY 3, 1940 

APPROVED 

OPINION 0 CoMMlrrEC 

Ew- C**r.“*Y
Exhibit 10.134


 





AMENDMENT


 


This Amendment ("Amendment") to the Registration
Rights Agreement dated March 28, 2014 (the "Investment Agreement") and subsequent amendment dated May 9th, 2014 between
Dutchess Opportunity Fund, II, LP ("Dutchess") and VG Life Sciences, Inc., (the "Company") is made this 4th
day of September, 2014.


 


WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of both parties to
facilitate (the "Facilitation") the amendments in connection with the Investment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and
mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and in reliance upon the representations and warranties contained herein, the
parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:


 


		1.	Amendment to the Registration Rights Agreement.



 


		a.	The Registration Rights Agreement is hereby amended to
DELETE in its entirety Section 2 (a) and contemporaneously the Registration Rights Agreement is hereby amended to INSERT the following
paragraph as the amended Section 2 (c):



 


		(a)	Subject to Section 3(g), the Company shall, within thirty
(30) days of the Company's clearing all SEC comments related to the Company's Form I 0 filing, file with the SEC the Registration
Statement or Registration Statements (as is necessary) on Form S-1 (or, if such form is unavailable for such a registration, on
such other form as is available for such registration), covering the resale of all of the Registrable Securities, which Registration
Statement(s) shall state that, in accordance with Rule 416 promulgated under the I 933 Act, such Registration Statement also covers
such indeterminate number of additional shares of Common Stock as may become issuable upon stock splits, stock dividends or similar
transactions. The Company will initially register for resale up to 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock, except to the extent that
the SEC requires the share amount to be reduced as a condition of effectiveness.



 


		2.	No other terms, rights or provisions of the Registration
Rights Agreement are or should be considered to have been modified by the terms of this Amendment and each party retains all other
rights, obligations, privileges and duties contained in Registration Rights Agreement that correspond respectively to the Registration
Rights Agreement including but not limited to the Investment Agreement between the Company and Dutchess.



 


 


Agreed and Accepted, and duly authorized to sign, on this 3rd
day of September. 2014


 


	By Dutchess:	/s/ Douglas H. Leighton
	 	Douglas H. Leighton, Managing Director
	 	 
	By Company:	/s/ John Tynan
	 	John Tynan, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.23


                            [LETTERHEAD OF INSYNQ]



September 22, 2000



     RE:  Extension of the filing by Insynq, Inc. (the "Company") of the
     Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (the "Registration Statement")

To the parties attached on Exhibit A hereto:
                           ---------

     Due to our need for additional financing, we request that you, the
undersigned stockholder of the Company, agree to extend the filing date of the
Registration Statement which is required under your applicable Registration &
Repurchase Agreement to October 3, 2000.

          If you agree to this extension, please sign below and return this
executed letter to Lisa A. Genecov, Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP, 2200 Ross Avenue,
Suite 2200, Dallas, Texas, 75201.

                                         Best Regards,

                                         /s/ John P. Gorst

                                         John P. Gorst
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


The undersigned hereby consents to extend the filing of the Registration
Statement to October 3, 2000.

                              TCA Investments, Inc.
                              -------------------------------
                              By: /s/ F.C. Fisher Jr.
                                 ----------------------------
                              Name: F.C. Fisher, Jr.
                                   --------------------------
                              Title: President
                                    -------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    This is notice that on May 4, 2010, Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 
1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration 
as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opium, raw (9600)..........................  II
Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670).............  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the basic classes of controlled 
substances to manufacture a bulk intermediate which will be distributed 
in bulk to the company's customers.
    As explained in the Correction to Notice of Application pertaining 
to Rhodes Technologies, 72 FR 3417 (2007), comments and requests for 
hearings on applications to import narcotic raw material are not 
appropriate.
    As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal Register on 
September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to 
import a basic class of any controlled substances in schedule I or II 
are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy 
Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), 
(e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: August 2, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-21749 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
----

**ADVANCE          DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**Series          G Preferred Stock**

**SUBSCRIPTION          AGREEMENT**

----

**ADVANCE        DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC**

**Series        G Preferred Stock**

**SUBSCRIPTION        AGREEMENT**

----

----

----

----

----

**SUBSCRIBER:**

|  By:  /s/                  Lawrence F. DeGeorgeName: Lawrence                  F. DeGeorge   | Address                  for Notices:       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Taxpayer                  Identification or Social Security Number of Subscriber:                                | Telephone:                                                      |

**Subscription        Schedule**

| Number                  of Shares subscribed for | Price                  per share | Total                  Subscription Price |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| 13,475                                           | $90                              | $1,212,750                                |

|   | Payments                  of the Total Subscription Price shall be made by Subscriber in                  the amounts                  requested by Company not less than ten (10) business days after                  Subscriber’s receipt from Company of a written demand for                  payment.  No such demand shall be for an amount greater than                  $100,000 without Subscriber’s consent.  No demand may be made                  during the ten (10) business days after a prior demand was                  made.  The Company may request amounts larger than $100,000 or                  upon less than ten (10) business days notice but Subscriber shall                  have no                  obligation to honor any such                  requests. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ADVANCE        DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket <greek-i> EPA-RO4-SFUND-2010-0729, FRL-9196-1]


Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site; Davie, Broward 
County, FL; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for 
reimbursement of past response costs concerning the Florida Petroleum 
Reprocessors Superfund Site located in Davie, Broward County, Florida 
for publication.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
October 1, 2010. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-
SFUND-2010-0729 or Site name Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund 
Site by one of the following methods:
    <bullet> http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm.
    <bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3464555d5a4051461a6455415855745144551a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4515242c2b3120376b1524302924052035246b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at (404) 562-8887.

    Dated: August 18, 2010.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-21834 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 1

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO

                            STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


         Agreement made this 27th day of October, 1999, by and between AHC
ACQUISITION, INC, a Pennsylvania corporation ("Buyer"), and PROVIDENT AMERICAN
CORPORATION ("Seller").

                                   BACKGROUND

         A. Buyer end Seller entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement dated
August 16, 1999 (the "Agreement").

         B. The parties are desirous of amending the Agreement as herein
provided.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00)
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree
as follows:

         1. Section 1.3.l(a) shall be amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

                  "(a) The approva1 of the transactions described herein by the
         boards of directors and lenders of PAMCO, PILIC, and BUYER."

         2. As herein amended, the Agreement is ratified, approved and affirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have placed their hands and
seals as of the day and year above first written.

                                      AHC ACQUISITION, INC.

                                      By: /s/ Alvin H. Clemens
                                          --------------------------
                                          Alvin H. Clemens
                                          President

                                      PROVIDENT AMERICAN CORPORATION

                                      By: /s/ Michael Ashker
                                          --------------------------
                                          Michael Ashker
                                          President
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WALTER SIMON.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.