alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1
       
<S>                         <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1998                     
<CASH>                                         10551
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 246587
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   198238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1411553    
<PP&E>                                       1543935
<DEPRECIATION>                               1253133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1906510   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          95254
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                        3350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                         0                    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1906510
<SALES>                                       346694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              351851  
<CGS>                                         275607            
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 382483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (56)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (30632) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (18750) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (11882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)            
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
         

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/Alan W. StockAlan W. StockChief Executive Officer  /s/ Carol WaldmanName:
    Carol WaldmanTitle:
    Notary Public
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 127995 & (14) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127995 COA: 255527 Wayne CC: 97-007435 ROGER A. DOWDY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 16, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is DENIED.

K ELLY
, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
#### LEE R. BYRD v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Digital Information Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 11, 2004 |  | /s/ PETER H. VAN OPPEN                                  
|                     |  | Peter H. van Oppen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
China Health Resource, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Health Resource, Inc.. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Health Resource, Inc.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    |  | /s/   Jiayin Wang          
|------ |  | ---------------------------
|Name:  |  | Jiayin Wang                
|Title: |  | Principal Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | March 31, 2011             
|By:    |  | /s/   Weihai Liu           
|Name:  |  | Weihai Liu                 
|Title: |  | Principal Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | March 31, 2011
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 229 

To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs located 

at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. 

Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. 

5 Crescenz Act of 2013’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 229 IS

1 SEC. 2. CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ DEPARTMENT 

2 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The medical center of the De4 partment of Veterans Affairs located at 3900 Woodland 

5 Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Vet8 erans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

12 shall be considered to be a reference to the Corporal Mi13 chael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

14 Center. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1210 

CA 11-00673 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

 

JAMES SQUARE ASSOCIATES LP, MOHAWK GLEN 

ASSOCIATES, LLC, PIONEER FULTON SHOPPING 

CENTER, LLC, PIONEER MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, 

AND WATERFRONT ASSOCIATES, LLC,

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

 

V ORDER

DENNIS MULLEN, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND JAMIE 

WOODWARD, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (OWEN DEMUTH OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JONATHAN B. FELLOWS OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme

Court, Onondaga County (John C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered June 22,

2010. The order and judgment granted the motion of plaintiffs for

summary judgment, denied the cross motion of defendants for summary

judgment, declared that Section 3 of the 2009 Amendments to the Empire

Zones Program is prospective only and declared that the June 29, 2009

decertification of plaintiffs, to the extent it was applied

retroactively to January 1, 2008, is null and void. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d

985). 

Entered: November 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 21.1
 CEVA, INC.
   Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationCEVA Limited
    
    Northern IrelandCEVA Development, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaCEVA Inc.
    
    Cayman IslandsCEVA Ireland Limited
    
    Republic of IrelandCEVA D.S.P. Limited
    
    IsraelCEVA Services Limited
    
    Republic of IrelandCEVA Systems LLC
    
    DelawareNihon CEVA K.K.
    
    JapanCEVA Technologies Limited
    
    Republic of IrelandCEVA SARL (*)
    
    FranceCEVA Technologies, Inc.
    
    Delaware
 (*)
    
    Currently in a liquidation process
#### IN RE PAROLE APPLICATION OF GEORGE M. MARX.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 30, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 30, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0051. MELISSA KAY SMITH v. JOHN BLAKE PEARCE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2012CV223785
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH BADAMO.

May 14, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CLIFFORD A. WILLIAMS AND ALLISON T. WILLIAMS.

May 24, 1985.

Leave to appeal is granted and the Appellate Division order of May 1, 1985, is summarily reversed. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, Burlington County, for further proceedings.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CAE Inc. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report).

I, Alain Raquepas, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(i)  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|    

/s/ Alain Raquepas Alain RaquepasVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 25, 2008

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40828

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERICK OCHOA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1824-1

Before ELROD, HAYNES, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Erick Ochoa-Rodriguez, federal prisoner # 26617-379, was convicted of 

two marijuana-related charges and was sentenced to serve 115 months in 

prison and a four-year term of supervised release. Now, he moves this court 

for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district 

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. We will not grant the motion 

unless he shows that he has an arguable claim and that his appeal is thus 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 30, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40828 Document: 00514576869 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2018
No. 17-40828

2

taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); 

United States v. Boutwell, 896 F.2d 884, 889-90 (5th Cir. 1990) (one-judge 

order); Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Our review of the record shows no abuse of discretion in connection with 

the district court’s denial of Ochoa-Rodriguez’s motion. See United States v. 

Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). Instead, this review shows that 

the district court acted properly by first determining that Ochoa-Rodriguez

qualified for a reduction and then weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to 

decide whether to exercise its discretion to grant this adjustment. See Dillon 

v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826-27 (2010). Ochoa-Rodriguez has not shown 

that this appeal is taken in good faith. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 201-02; 

Boutwell, 896 F.2d at 889-90; Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, his IFP 

motion is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 

 Case: 17-40828 Document: 00514576869 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/30/2018
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21043

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SULAIMAN MUSTAPHA FARAWE, also known

as Michael Ajibola Farawe,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-01-CR-303-2)

-------------------- November 7, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellee Sulaiman Mustapha Farawe appeals the

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to possess and traffic in 15 or more counterfeit or

unauthorized access devices and aiding and abetting in the

possession of more than 15 counterfeit or unauthorized access

devices. He first argues that the district court erred in basing

its loss calculation on the intended loss from his credit card

fraud rather than the actual loss. We have reviewed the record and2

conclude that the district court did not plainly err by calculating

Farawe’s se ntence on the basis of the intended loss. S ee United

States v. Saacks

, 131 F.3d 540, 542-43 (5th Cir. 1997); United

States v. Ismoila , 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5 th Cir. 1996).

We also reject Farawe’s argument that the district court

improperly denied him c redit for acceptance of responsibility.

Throughout the rearraignment and sentencing, Farawe attempted to

minimize his participation in the offense of convicti on and

attempted to downplay his fraudulent intent. See U.S.S.G.

§ 3E1.1(a); United States v. Wilder , 15 F.3d 1292, 1299 (5th Cir.

1994).

Faraw e contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to

“protect” his opportunity to receive a two-level adjus tment for

acceptance of responsibility and f or failing to investigate and

object to the loss and restitution calculations. We decline to

review Sixth Amendment claims of ineffective assistance of counsel

on direct appeal when, as here, the record is not sufficiently

developed to allow us to evaluate fairly the merits of the claims.

See United States v. Gibson

, 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995);

United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PHILIP HERNANDEZ.

July 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.32


 


KINEMED, INC.


 


Non-Employee
Director Compensation Policy


 


Each non-employee director serving on the
Board of Directors (the “Board”) of KineMed, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive an annual
base fee for his or her services of $35,000, and a one-time initial award of options to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock, which will vest quarterly over a three-year period, subject to the director’s continued service on the Board.
Thereafter, each director will receive an annual award of options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock,
which will vest upon the earlier to occur of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the stockholder meeting in the year
following the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service on the Board. The vice chairperson of the Board
will also receive an annual cash retainer of $20,000 for his or her service in such role. In addition, each non-employee director,
other than the chairperson of such committee, who serves on the audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees
will receive an annual cash retainer of $7,500, $5,000, and $5,000, respectively, for each committee on which he or she serves.
Each chairperson of the audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees will receive an additional annual
cash retainer of $15,000, $10,000 and $8,000, respectively. The Company will also reimburse each of the directors for their travel
expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and committee meetings. All cash retainers will be paid in equal
quarterly installments.


 


Approved: 


Effective:
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY WILLIAMS.

March 4, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 171 (Friday, September 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54220-54221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Skowhegan and Madison, Somerset 
County, ME

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Terminate (Withdraw) EIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process for a proposed highway 
project examining both new highway alignments and infrastructure 
improvements to enhance transportation mobility and accessibility 
through and around Skowhegan in the Towns of Skowhegan and Madison, 
Maine is terminated (withdrawn). The original Notice of Intent for this 
EIS process was published in the Federal Register on November 29, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hasselmann, Right of Way and 
Environmental Programs Manager, Federal Highway Administration, Maine 
Division, 40 Western Avenue, Augusta, Maine 04330, Telephone (207) 622-
8350, extension 103; or Judy Lindsey, Project Manager, Maine Department 
of Transportation, State House Station 16, Augusta, Maine 04333-0016, 
Telephone (207) 624-3291.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Maine 
Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), has terminated the EIS process 
begun in 2005 to address mobility and accessibility needs through and 
around Skowhegan, Somerset County, Maine. Work on the EIS is being 
discontinued due to adverse economic and environmental impacts, lack of 
community support, and a lack of design and construction funds. 
Therefore, the EIS for this project has been terminated. (Catalog of 
Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and 
Construction. The regulations

[[Page 54221]]

implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental 
consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Authority:  23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48

    Issued on: August 25, 2010.
Cheryl B. Martin,
Assistant Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 
Augusta, Maine.
[FR Doc. 2010-21811 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M