alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


               [Letterhead of Arthur Andersen LLP Appears Here]




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 8-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-37505, No. 333-88297 and No.
333-53652) and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-77619).



                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
 May 18, 2001
Exhibit
      23.2








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      have
      issued our report dated April 9, 2004, accompanying the consolidated balance
      sheet of Invisa, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and the related consolidated
      statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then
      ended contained in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, which report
      contains an explanatory paragraph relating to certain significant risks and
      uncertainties which conditions raise to substantial doubt about the Company’s
      ability to continue as a going concern. We consent to the use of the
      aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus.





/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP











Tampa,
      Florida


February
      3, 2006
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Resource, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Mr. Terry Deru, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
Andrew Limpert, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of our knowledge and belief:

         (1) The accompanying report on form 10 -KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the
period ending December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Prime
Resource, Inc.




Date:    January 5, 2006                     /s/ Terry M. Deru
                                            Mr. Terry M. Deru
                                            President, Director



Date:    January 5, 2006                    /s/ Andrew W. Limpert
                                            Mr. Andrew W. Limpert
                                            CFO, Director


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00266-CR

IN RE CHARLES ROBERT BLAKE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Charles Robert Blake, petitioned this Court to order the trial court to rule 

on relator’s “Request for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to Article 64, Code of 

Criminal Procedure.” We requested a response from the real party in interest, but also 

noted that if a ruling on relator’s motion had been made before the due date of the 

response, a copy of the ruling may be provided in lieu of a response.

The Court was provided a copy of the trial court’s ruling on relator’s motion. 

Accordingly, since a ruling has been made, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is 

dismissed as moot.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
In re Blake Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Petition dismissed as moot

Opinion delivered and filed August 28, 2019

Do not publish 

[OT06]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2610

_____________________________
W ILLIAM P RIVETT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.
May 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm i n part and reverse in part for further proceedings.

In 2011, following a jury trial, the appellant was convicted of lewd and lascivious battery and contributing to the delinquency of a minor and sentenced to prison. The appellant filed a timely motion f or postconviction relief alleging five claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affi rm the denial of grounds one, three
, four

, and five without further discussion. However, for the reasons discussed below
, we reverse and remand the denial of
groun d two for further proceedings.2 In ground two, the appellant alleged that counsel was ineffective for failing to call an expert to testify that the appellant did not writ e certain notes to the victim. The victim testified that she saw the appellant writ e the notes in which he allegedly professed his love for the victim and specified a certain sexual act he wanted to engage in with her

. He alleges that he did not write the letters and that an expert would be able to confirm as much. He alleges that if a n expert had established that he did not write the notes, the victim’s credibility would have been harmed

, and her testimony was the only evidence against him. There is nothing i n the record before this Court that conclusively refutes the appellant’s clai ms. Thus, we reverse and remand for the trial court to hold a hearing on the appellant’s claim.

A FFIRMED in part, R EVERSED in part
, and R EMANDED with directions.

R AY , B ILBR E Y , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until dis position of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William Privett, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                Subsidiaries                           Incorporated
                                                          (TEXAS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.D. Vest Investment Securities,                            1983
Inc. "HDVIS"

H.D. Vest Advisory Services,                                1987
Inc. "HDVAS"

H.D. Vest Technology Services,                              1999
Inc. "HDVTI"

H.D. Vest Mortgage Services,                                1989
Inc. "HDVMS"

H.D. Vest Collateral Management                             1988
Compaany "HDVCMC"

H.D. Vest Business Valuation                                1987
Services, Inc. "HDVBVS"

H.D. Vest Corporate Finance,                                1990
Inc. "HDVCF"
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12290 and #12291]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1935-DR), dated 08/19/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/22/2010 through 08/07/2010.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         08/19/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/18/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/19/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/19/2010, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed 
                    ( print page 52789)
                    above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Carroll, Cook, Dupage, Jo Daviess, Ogle, Stephenson, Winnebago. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Illinois: Boone, Dekalb, Kane, Kendall, Lake, Lee, Mchenry, Whiteside, Will. Iowa: Clinton, Dubuque, Jackson. Indiana: Lake. Wisconsin: Grant, Green, Lafayette, Rock. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 122906 and for economic injury is 122910. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-21420 Filed 8-26-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventures-National Incorporation d/b/a Titan General Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Curtis Okumara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ventures-National Incorporation and will be retained by Ventures-National Incorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/ Curtis OkumuraDate: January 14, 2005Curtis OkumuraChief Executive OfficerVentures-National Incorporated
Alimera-Exhibit




Exhibit 4.11


IRREVOCABLE WAIVER  
OF  
RIGHT TO DESIGNATE SERIES A DIRECTOR
 
May 16, 2014
Reference is hereby made to Section (5)(b) of Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 1, 2012 (the “Certificate”) of Alimera Sciences, Inc., a Delaware company (the “Company”), pursuant to which the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting as single class, are entitled to elect the Series A Director designated by the Second Lead Purchaser at any election of the Company’s Class II Directors so long as the Second Lead Purchaser continues to hold at least 50% of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock originally issued to such Second Lead Purchaser at the closing under the Purchase Agreement (or shares of Common Stock issued upon conversion thereof).  Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings attributed to such terms under the Certificate.
The undersigned holders of Series A Preferred Stock hereby irrevocably waive the right of Sofinnova Venture Partners VIII, L.P. as Second Lead Purchaser under the Certificate to designate the Series A Director. Such waiver is limited to the right to designate the Series A Director and the undersigned holders of Series A Preferred Stock do not waive any other right such holders have under the Certificate.
[Signature pages follow.]







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Irrevocable Waiver of Right to Designate Series A Director as of the date first above written. 
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.




By:      /s/ Richard S. Eiswirth, Jr.        
Name: Richard S. Eiswirth, Jr. 
Title:   COO and CFO





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Irrevocable Waiver of Right to Designate Series A Director as of the date first above written. 
PALO ALTO HEALTHCARE MASTER FUND, L.P.


By:  Palo Alto Investors, LLC
Its General Partner




By:    /s/ Patrick Lee                
Name: Patrick Lee
Title: Member of the General Partner






PALO ALTO HEALTHCARE MASTER FUND II, L.P.


By:  Palo Alto Investors, LLC
Its General Partner




By:    /s/ Patrick Lee                
Name: Patrick Lee
Title: Member of the General Partner






MICRO CAP PARTNERS, L.P.


By:  Palo Alto Investors, LLC
Its General Partner




By:    /s/ Patrick Lee                
Name: Patrick Lee
Title: Member of the General Partner





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Irrevocable Waiver of Right to Designate Series A Director as of the date first above written.


SOFINNOVA VENTURE PARTNERS VIII, L.P.


By:    Sofinnova Management VIII, L.L.C. 
    its General Partner




By:      /s/ James Healy             
    




Name:     James Healy                


Title: Managing Member
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      13
<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                       OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
              ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                            CWMBS, INC.
              CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2002-5
         MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-5


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                               Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER


/s/ Mark Wong                                          Dated: March 27,  2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT



                                      14
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00167-CV

Stephen Pruski

v.

Texas Windstorm Insurance Association

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020DCV-2256-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be REVERSED and the cause 

REMANDED to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 23, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2298

 To provide for a lifetime National Recreational Pass for any veteran 
      with a service-connected disability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2014

  Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a lifetime National Recreational Pass for any veteran 
      with a service-connected disability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wounded Veterans Recreation Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL PASSES FOR DISABLED VETERANS.

    Section 805(b)(2) of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 
(16 U.S.C. 6804(b)(2)) is amended as follows:
            (1) By inserting ``and for the lifetime of the passholder'' 
        after ``without charge''.
            (2) By striking ``charge, to'' and inserting ``charge, to 
        the following:''.
            (3) By striking ``any United States'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) Any United States''.
            (4) By inserting after ``residency.'' the following:
                    ``(B) Any veteran with a service-connected 
                disability, as defined in section 101 of title 38, 
                United States Code.''.
            (5) By striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                             39
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,209
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,313
<PP&E>                         49,659
<DEPRECIATION>                (30,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 18,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,272
<BONDS>                             0 
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                        919 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   19,981
<SALES>                         2,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,754
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (42)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      (42)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (0.035)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.035)<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Partner equity - 1,190 Partnership units
outstanding.
<F2> Per Partnership Unit in thousands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2776

___________ Florida Ewings, Administratrix of * Estate of Hazel Tatum Bowers with * will annexed, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Cleveland Robert Ellis, * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Appellant, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Bank of America, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 29, 2008 Filed: January 23, 2009

___________ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Cleveland Robert Ellis app eals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) order remanding this unlawful detainer action agains t him to state court. We first note that the remand order is unreviewable to the exte nt it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but it is re viewable to the extent Ellis attempted to remove the action from state cour t based on 28 U.S.C. § 1443. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (remand order is not reviewable on appeal, except that remand of case that was removed pursuant to § 1443 is reviewab le). Upon careful review of Ellis’s assertions to support removal under secti on 1443, we conclude that removal was not warranted under that provision. See Georgia v. Rachel , 384 U.S. 780, 800 (1966) (removal under § 1443(1) is warranted “only if it can be predicte d by reference to a law of general application th at the defendant will be denied or cannot enforce the specified federal rights in the state courts”); City of Greenwood, Miss. v. Peacock , 384 U.S. 808, 814-15 (1966) (§ 1443(2) is available only to federal officers and persons assisting such officers in perform ance of official duties); see also Bizzle v. McKesson Corp. , 961 F.2d 719, 721 (8th Cir. 1992) (in reviewing case on appeal, court may affirm on any ground supported by record, ev en though that ground was not addressed in court below). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________