alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG10-39-000]


Hatchet Ridge Wind, LLC; Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt 
Wholesale Generator Status

August 23, 2010.
    Take notice that during the month of July 2010, the status of the 
above-captioned entity as an Exempt Wholesale Generator became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 
366.7(a).

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21649 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the annual report of Quality Exchange, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December  31,
2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Andrew D. Owens,  acting  in  the
capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew D. Owens
---------------------
     Andrew D. Owens
     Chief Executive Officer
     March 25, 2004
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAURA WINTER.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53296-53297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21652]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2198-000 ]


Lakefield Wind Project, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 20, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Lakefield Wind Project, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is September 9, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail

[[Page 53297]]

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bef8fbecfdf1d0d2d7d0dbedcbceced1cccafed8dbccdd90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a3a0b7a6aa8b898c8b80b69095958a9791a583809786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21652 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4



                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Board of Directors
Miller Exploration Company
Traverse City, Michigan



     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the Miller and
Lents, Ltd. estimates of proved reserves contained in Miller Exploration
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, into
Miller Exploration Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on or
about June 16, 2000.

                                    MILLER AND LENTS, LTD

                                    /s/ Larry M. Gring

                                    Larry M. Gring
                                    Senior Vice President


Houston, Texas
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4171

_____________________________
T IMOTHY C LARENCE M ILLER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. June 20, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and David A. Henson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Ge neral, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000770470
<NAME> PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          49,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,500
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,010)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,347)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 30, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Troy LowrieTroy LowrieChairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, Acting Principal Financial Officer and
Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal
Financial Officer)
#### STATE v. WARD

No. 158A92-5

Case below: Pitt County Superior Court

Motion by Attorney General to lift stay of execution denied 25 October 2000. Defendant must file any subsequent motion for appropriate relief on or before 18 December 2000.
#### STATE v. SCANLON

No. 480A99-2

Case below: Durham County Superior Court

Motion by defendant for temporary stay allowed 4 May 2001.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDDIE C. RASBERRY, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-76, CA-00-76-2) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 19, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie C. Rasberry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eddie C. Rasberry, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Rasberry , Nos. CR-00-76; CA-00-76-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2001; entered Aug. 1, 2001).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 27, 2004 (the "Report") as filed on the date hereof with the securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
August 6, 2004

| |  | /s/DAVID A. DODDDavid A. Dodd
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 20, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 20, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0050. JOHN ARTHUR GULD et al. v. GAIL RUSS VICKERS, AS SURVIVING 

SPOUSE OF IRA WENDELL VICKERS, DECEASED.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV036
#### In re NATIONAL DEPARTMENT STORES, Inc. LAMPORT v. NATIONAL DEPARTMENT STORES, Inc., et al.

No. 5931.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Oct. 27, 1937.

Reuben Satterwaite, Jr., of Wilmington, Del., and Louis E. Levinthal, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Richards, Layton & Finger, of Wilmington, Del., and White & Case and Stein ,& Salant, all of New York City (Joseph M. Hartfield, Morton Stein, and Milton Kramer, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and WATSON and FORMAN, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order allowing the appellant the sum of $12,500 for his services as one of three trustees appointed under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. § 207). After full consideration we are of the opinion that the court below made adequate provision for appellant, and its order is affirmed.
[No. 6294.

Decided December 12, 1906.]

#### Standard Ice Company, *Respondent,*v. A. W. Pratt *et al., Appellants.*
      *1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered February 14, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff.

Affirmed.

*Ira Bronson*and *D. B. Trefethen,*for appellants.

*Horace A. Wilson,*for respondent.

Reported in 87 Pac. 936

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover on account of a quantity of ice sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. A trial was had before the court without a jury, and a judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $605.90, from which the defendants have appealed.

The sole controversy is in reference to what price the appellants are obligated to pay for the ice. We find the evidence very conflicting and confusing as to what was the agreement and understanding between the parties. It appears that, prior to June 2, 1905, ice was being furnished at $2 per ton at the ice plant. Appellants contend that they had a written contract for $3 per ton delivered, afterwards modified orally calling for its delivery at the ice plant at $2 per ton, for a period of three years. But respondent disputes this, and the evidence is not clear that the minds of the parties ever actually met upon such agreement. In any event, however, on June 2, the respondent gave appellants written notice that, thereafter, the price would be $3.25 per ton, and that they could get ice at the plant of the Washington Cold Storage Company, where respondent had arranged for them to get it until further notice. Appellants objected to the price, but proceeded to take the ice at the place mentioned in respondent’s notice, knowing that the price fixed in the notice was $3.25 per ton. By reason of such facts the court found as follows: “That between the 1st and 24th days of June, 1905, the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendants, sold and furnished to the defendants certain quantities of ice, to wit, 15.8 tons at $2 per ton, and 176.7 tons at $3.25 per ton.”

We think the finding is sustained by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-K/A, for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2006 |  | /s/    Evan H. Zucker                
|                     |  | Evan H. Zucker                       
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 21 - List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant



   The following is a list of subsidiaries meeting the requirements of Exhibit
21.

   a) The Grant County Bank (incorporated in West Virginia), doing business as
The Grant County Bank.

   b)  Capon Valley Bank (incorporated in West Virginia), doing business as the
Capon Valley Bank.

   c)  HBI Life Insurance Company, Inc. (incorporated in the state of Arizona),
doing business as HBI Life.

                                                                   Exhibit 21
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans
owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-1 (the loans) has been conducted
by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the
terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated March 15, 2002
(the Agreement) for the period of March 15, 2002 to December 31, 2002.
Management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about Household Finance Corporation's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in
compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the
procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set
forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about Household Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the loans has been
conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance
with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated March
15, 2002 for the period of March 15, 2002 to December 31, 2002 is fairly stated,
in all material respects.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


For the period of March 15, 2002 to December 31, 2002, the servicing of home
equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-1 has been conducted
by Household Consumer Lending, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in
its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master
Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated March 15, 2002.




/s/ JOE VOZAR                               /s/ JORGE CORDON
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Joe Vozar                                   Jorge Cordon
Chief Financial Officer-                    Managing Director- Operations-
Household Consumer Lending                  Household Consumer Lending


February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
EXHIBIT 31.1

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Dixon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Knight Fuller, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: April 14, 2004                /s/ Robert E. Dixon
                                    ---------------------
                                    Robert E. Dixon
                                    Co-chairman, Co-chief Executive Officer and
                                    President