alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Home System Group (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Li Wei Qiu, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                  Li Wei QiuLi
                Wei QiuChief
                Executive Officer




__________________




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
**EXHIBIT      21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF REGISTRANT**

| **Subsidiary**                                                                                   |   | **Jurisdiction                of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                             |   |                                             |
| **Direct                Subsidiaries of Mobilepro Corp.**                                        |   |                                             |
| CloseCall                America, Inc.                                                           |   | Delaware                                         |
| Affinity                Telecom, Inc.                                                            |   | Delaware                                         |
| Davel                Acquisition Corp.                                                           |   | Delaware                                         |
| Davel                Communications, Inc. (subsidiary of Davel Acquisition                Corp.) |   | Delaware                                         |
| American                Fiber Network, Inc.                                                      |   | Delaware                                         |
| ProGames                Network, Inc.                                                            |   | Delaware                                         |
|                                                                                             |   |                                             |
| **Direct                and Indirect Subsidiaries of Davel Communications,                Inc.** |   |                                             |
| Davel                Financing Company, LLC                                                      |   | Delaware                                         |
| Davel                Communications Group, Inc.                                                  |   | Illinois                                         |
| Davel                Mexico, Ltd.                                                                |   | Illinois                                         |
| Telaleasing                Enterprises, Inc.                                                     |   | Illinois                                         |
| Peoples                Telephone Company, Inc.                                                   |   | New                York                          |
| PhoneTel                Technologies, Inc.                                                       |   | Ohio                                             |
| Davel                de Mexico, S. de RL (subsidiary of Davel Mexico, Ltd.)                      |   | Mexico                                           |
| Telefonos                Publico (subsidiary of Davel Mexico, Ltd.)                              |   | Mexico                                           |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2038

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00019-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 20, 2023

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2038 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint 

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hairston v. R.R. Ret. Bd., No. 

3:22-cv-00019-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2038 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent, v. Tyrone MATTHEWS, Appellant.

No. 34984.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One.

April 23, 1974.

Brady, Brady & Devereaux, Daniel R. Devereaux, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor, Raymond J. Issa, St. Louis, for respondent.

KELLY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the City Court of the City of St. Louis of a violation of Sec. 772.010, Revised Code of the City of St. Louis, 1960, Ordinance No. 50549, of selling or offering for sale a sex inciting device and he appealed to the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. Sec. 479.110 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. Thereafter on September 12, 1972, after a trial to the court without a jury, he was again convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $100.00 and court costs, and allowed ten days to file a motion for new trial. On the tenth day following the finding of guilt, a motion for new trial was filed, and thereafter, on the 29th day of September, 1972, his motion for new trial was overruled and he was given ten days to file an appeal. On October 11, 1972, a notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Correction.

Appeals from judgments in cases appealed to the St. Louis Court of Criminal *195Correction from city police courts are taken to the St. Louis court of appeals (now the Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District) and must be applied for within ten days after judgment. Sec. 479.250 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. However, although not presented to this court by appellant, we have determined that there has been no judgment from which an appeal might be taken in this case and the submission of the cause on appeal must be set aside and the cause remanded to the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction with directions to properly sentence the appellant and render a final judgment. State v. Summers, 477 S.W.2d 721, 722[1, 2] (Mo.App.1972).

The record in this court shows that after the City rested its case the appellant’s counsel announced that he had no evidence. The trial court thereupon overruled appellant’s motion to dismiss and announced:

> “BY THE COURT: Tyrone Matthews the Court finds you guilty as charged in the information of ‘Selling of Sex Inciting Devices.’

The Court now sentences you to pay a fine of $100.00 and costs.” The appellant was then granted ten days to file a motion for new trial. Within the time allowed appellant did file his motion for new trial which was, as stated supra, overruled. The record fails to evidence that the appellant was ever sentenced or that a final judgment of conviction was entered after the motion for new trial was overruled. The attempt of the trial court to sentence appellant prior to disposing of the motion for new trial was a nullity, does not constitute a final judgment, and we have no jurisdiction to hear an appeal in the absence of a final judgment in the trial court. State v. Summers, *supra.*

Accordingly we remand the cause to the trial court with directions to properly sentence the defendant and render a final judgment; the defendant may thereafter have a right to appeal from that judgment.

DOWD, C. J., and SIMEONE and WEIER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                                     OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of National Investment Managers Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2006                  /s/ Steven Ross
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Steven Ross
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 14, 2006                  /s/ Leonard Neuhaus
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Leonard Neuhaus
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, AT EL PASO

No. 08-13-00156-CV

Sanders Oil & Gas, Ltd.

v.

Big Lake Kay Construction, Inc.

(No. 1555 IN 112TH DISTRICT COURT OF REAGAN COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

FILING $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$1,250.00

$61.00

$10.00

$10.00

$175.00 E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

PAID

PAID TAMMY COLE

STEVEN L. WOOLARD

STEVEN L. WOOLARD

JOHNSON LAW FIRM

SANDERS OIL & GAS, LTD.

BROOME LAW OFFICE

STANLEY BROOME

BROOME LAW FIRM

BROOME LAW FIRM

Balance of costs owing to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DENISE PACHECO

, CLERK OF THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and

correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and

styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Eighth District of Texas, this May 24, 2018.

Denise Pacheco, Clerk
#### STATE v. HOLLOWAY

No. 294P00

Case below: 138 N.C. App. 554

Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000. Second petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.
#### RAND v. SANKIN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 19-0372 

 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

 

MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Defendant/Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion 

within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response must be 

served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the 

County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender Division. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the 

Defendant/Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 19 2020

08/19/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0372
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2338 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2338 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Anti3 Doping Agency Reauthorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBIT PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING METHODS. 

5 Section 701 of title VII of the Office of National 

6 Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (21 

7 U.S.C. 2001) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (4); 

9 and 

10 (2) in subsection (b)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and be 

12 recognized worldwide as the independent na13 tional anti-doping organization for the United 

14 States’’ after ‘‘Committee’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, or per16 formance-enhancing genetic modifications ac17 complished through gene-doping’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘or prohibited performance-enhancing methods 

19 adopted by the Agency’’; 

20 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘, or per21 formance-enhancing genetic modifications ac22 complished through gene-doping’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘or prohibited performance-enhancing methods 

24 adopted by the Agency’’; 

25 (D) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and the 

26 prevention of use of performance-enhancing 
3 

†S 2338 ES

1 drugs, or performance-enhancing genetic modi2 fications accomplished through gene-doping by 

3 United States amateur athletes; and’’ and in4 serting ‘‘, and the prevention of use by United 

5 States amateur athletes of performance-enhanc6 ing drugs or prohibited performance-enhancing 

7 methods adopted by the Agency.’’; and 

8 (E) by striking paragraph (5). 

9 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

10 Section 703 of title VII of the Office of National 

11 Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (21 

12 U.S.C. 2003) is amended to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘SEC. 703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

14 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the 

15 United States Anti-Doping Agency— 

16 ‘‘(1) for fiscal year 2014, $11,300,000; 

17 ‘‘(2) for fiscal year 2015, $11,700,000; 

18 ‘‘(3) for fiscal year 2016, $12,300,000; 

19 ‘‘(4) for fiscal year 2017, $12,900,000; 

20 ‘‘(5) for fiscal year 2018, $13,500,000; 

21 ‘‘(6) for fiscal year 2019, $14,100,000; and 
4 

†S 2338 ES

1 ‘‘(7) for fiscal year 2020, $14,800,000.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 11, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2338 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping 

Agency, and for other purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XY67


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (MAFMC) Spiny 
Dogfish Monitoring Committee will hold a meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, September 24, 2010, from 10 
a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn Providence 
Airport/Warwick, One Thurber Street/Jefferson Blvd., Warwick, RI 02886; 
telephone: (401) 734-9600.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, 
Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331, extension 255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting will be to 
discuss quota recommendations and associated management measures for 
spiny dogfish for fishing years 2011-15.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 
those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this 
meeting. Actions will be restricted to those issues specifically 
identified in this notice and any issues arising after publication of 
this notice that require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the 
MAFMC's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to M. Jan Saunders at the Mid-Atlantic Council 
Office, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 27, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21881 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Troy H. Lowrie, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of VCG Holding Corp. for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2005; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuer’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls. 

Date:    March 31, 2006
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.0
 
 PFGI Capital Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Unaudited)
 
 Inception toFor the Year Ended
    
    December 31,(Dollars in Thousands)
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003
    
    2002Income before income tax expense
    
    $
    19,186
    
    
    $
    18,894
    
    
    $
    15,948
    
    
    $
    16,869
    
    
    $
    9,617Fixed charges
    
    
    7,654
    
    
    
    10,333
    
    
    
    12,788
    
    
    
    12,788
    
    
    
    5,541Total income for computation
    
    
    26,840
    
    
    
    29,227
    
    
    
    28,736
    
    
    
    29,657
    
    
    
    15,158Total fixed charges
    
    
    7,654
    
    
    
    10,333
    
    
    
    12,788
    
    
    
    12,788
    
    
    
    5,541Ratio of Earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.51
    x
    
    
    2.83
    x
    
    
    2.25
    x
    
    
    2.32
    x
    
    
    2.74
    xComponents of Fixed ChargesPreferred stock dividends
    
    
    7,654
    
    
    
    10,333
    
    
    
    12,788
    
    
    
    12,788
    
    
    
    5,541