alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2166 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify provisions relating 

to determinations of full-time equivalent employees for purposes of the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2014 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. WARNER, 

Mr. BEGICH, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

provisions relating to determinations of full-time equivalent employees for purposes of the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treating Families 

5 Fairly Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2166 IS

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO FULL-TIME 

2 EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(F) EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN EMPLOY7 EES.—In determining the number of full-time 

8 employees of an employer for purposes of this 

9 section, an employee that is covered under mini10 mal essential coverage under an eligible em11 ployer sponsored plan (as defined in section 

12 5000A(f)(2)) as the spouse or child of another 

13 employee who is employed by such employer 

14 shall not be counted.’’. 

15 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

16 shall promulgate regulations necessary to carry out the 

17 amendment made by subsection (a), including providing 

18 guidance on the status of employees that leave their 

19 present employer or have a family member leave their 

20 present employer after an exemption under such amend21 ment has been provided. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
PCP 20140529 10K EX 10.8








Exhibit 10.8


Summary of Terms of Outside Director Deferred Stock Units


Type of Award.  Each Deferred Stock Unit (a “DSU”) gives a director the right to receive one share of Common Stock at a future date.
Stock Incentive Plan.  The DSUs and related shares of Common Stock are granted under the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
Amount of Award.  A dollar value per year as determined by the Compensation Committee; the closing stock price on the date of grant is divided into the dollar value of the award to determine the number of DSUs issued to each outside director.
Timing of Award.  Grants are made annually immediately after the annual meeting. 
Payment of Award.  The award will be paid, to the extent vested, upon cessation of board service unless deferred.
Payment Deferral.  A director can elect to defer payment of the award beyond the scheduled payment date, subject to the requirements of Section 409A.   
Payment Form.  The award will be settled in shares of Common Stock equal to the number of DSUs in a director’s account at the time of payment.  No fractional shares will be issued.  Any fractional shares will be rounded down to a whole number of shares.
Vesting.  A DSU award vests over three years, one-third immediately after each of the next three annual meetings after the grant date.  
Accelerated Vesting.  Vesting would accelerate on:
		
	•
	change of control


		
	•
	retirement at or after normal retirement age, i.e., age 71


		
	•
	death


		
	•
	disability


Dividend Equivalents.  On each date on which the Company pays a dividend on Common Stock, DSUs will receive the benefit of the value of such dividend.  Not less often than annually the value of such dividends will be divided by the closing stock price and the resulting number of additional whole or fractional DSUs will be credited to the directors.
Restrictions on Transfer.  DSUs are not transferable before payment date.
 

August 2013
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-136063, 333-141413, 333-149721 and 333-157852 on
Form S-8 of our report dated March 23, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Techwell Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") and our report
dated March 23, 2010, relating to the effectiveness of Techwell Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the Company's internal control
over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Techwell Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Jose, California
March 23, 2010

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          19,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,779
<PP&E>                                         285,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,958
<BONDS>                                        124,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,385
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,606
<SALES>                                         14,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,165
<CGS>                                            5,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (242)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)


</TABLE>
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT NAS HVILLE

STA TE OF TEN NES SEE v. THEOD ORE F. HOLD EN

Crim inal Cou rt for Davidson Coun ty

No. 2003-B-904

No. M2004- 00570-CCA -R3-C D - F iled April 19, 2005

J OHN E VE R E TT W I L L I AMS , J
., d i s s en t i n g.

I respe ctfully

disag ree with the majority ’s conc lusion that the defendant did not open the door
to c ro ss- e xam in ati on c on c e rn ing oth e r f e lon ie s in vo lvi ng dis ho ne sty . T his de fe nd a nt’ s r e c or d is extensive, and all but one of his thirteen convictions involve ac ts of dishonesty . The de fenda nt’s

cre dibilit y

was a n i s s u e when he chose to testify . For me, it is a close question of whe ther the questions asked by

the defendant’s attorney opened the door for further examination. By this Imean it a pp e ars that de fe ns e cou ns el was c le arl y try ing to c on ve y

the de fe nd a nt’ s r e c or d c on sis te d o nly of misdemeanor

offe nses. I

trust the trial court he ard the inflec tions in defense c ounsel’s voice that he used to e mphasize “misdemeanor ” in his questioning. Althoug h his questions co n t ained true statements, the inflec tions u s ed i n asking the questions by defe nse counse l could surely place an

u n d u e e mp h a s is o n “ mi s d e me a n o r , ” c r e a ti n g a mi s imp r e s s io n o n a ju r y

. I b e li e v e the ca valier

answe rs g iven by

the def endant f urther ope ned the door

when h e answ ere d, “I

g uess, y eah,” and “O.K.” The de fenda nt had an e x tensive criminal recor d. His first arr est was at ag e ninetee n, and he is now thirty -t wo. The recor d reve als that the def endant ha d never

acc umulated more tha n three
y e ars of g oo d c on du c t w ith ou t be ing arres ted

. Hi s ans we rs to the sp e c if ic qu e sti on s b y

de fe ns e counsel we re answer ed in such a way that a jury could m istakenly believe that his brushes with the law we re so infr equent or minor t h at he had dif

ficulty reme mbering them. I

believe this line of questions was designed to convey a fa lse impression to the jury . Tenne ssee Rule of E vidence 609 envisions impeachment by the State of a

criminal def

endant if he or s h e ch o o s es t o testify . Her e, defe nse counse l soug ht to lessen the sting of the state’s impeachme nt or to ste al the state’s thunder
, a pe rm iss ibl e ta c tic . H ow e ve r, thi s p e rm is si bl e tr ia l ta c tic mus t be e mpl oy e d w ith the utm os t caution or the door will be opene d for the State to c ross-examine on his entire r ecor d. Under the fac ts of this c ase, I conclude the trial court was corr ect in ruling that the defe ndant opene d the door to further impeachme nt. Respectfully submitt ed,

______________________________

J OHN EV ERETT WI

L L I A M S, J UDGE
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green, Jr.Walter Reid Green, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:  April 15, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-920-1310-FI; CACA 47609]

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
CACA 47609, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Leases

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease CACA 47609 from Mirada 
Petroleum Inc. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by 
all required rentals and royalties accruing from August 1, 2009, the 
date of termination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Altamira, Land Law Examiner, 
Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy and Minerals, BLM California 
State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1623, Sacramento, California 95825, 
(916) 978-4378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued affecting the 
lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 
administrative fee and has reimbursed the BLM for the cost of this 
Federal Register notice. The Lessee has met all the requirements for 
reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the 
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing 
to reinstate the lease effective August 1, 2009, subject to the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above.

Brenda Kidder,
Land Law Examiner, Acting, Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division 
of Energy & Minerals.
[FR Doc. 2010-21898 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
```
News United States Air Force
 Yesterday's Air Force: Gen. Henry ‘Hap’ ArnoldPublished Dec. 2, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- This episode of Yesterday's Air Force looks at the career of Gen.Henry H. "Hap" Arnold, the only man to ever hold both grades of general of the Army and general of the Air Force.
Yesterday's Air Force is a history and heritage featurette series profiling significant people and missions from the Air Force's past.YAF 



Hap Arnold 



heritage 



WWII
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund V (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                   |  |  |  |                                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner Rancon Realty Fund
V
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 588 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KACEY LEE SECREASE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 14 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2020

09/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0588
Exhibit 99(c)


                          Certificate as to Compliance
                          ----------------------------

         I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation
(the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 15, 2002 among HFC
Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, Household Finance Corporation, the Master
Servicer and Bank One, National Association, as Trustee, that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from March 15
         through December 31, 2002 (the "Period") and of its performance under
         the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
         and

         2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
         Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.


                                       /s/ STEVEN H. SMITH
                                       -------------------
                                       Steven H. Smith
                                       Servicing Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES D. WILLIAMS.

October 3, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 18, 2018

No. 04

- 16

- 00755

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF AMINITA PEREZ

- MUZZA, DECEASED

,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb Co unty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007PB7000089 L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The court ha s considered the appellant ’ s motion for rehearing en banc, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.7 - Director Compensation Summary Q4 F14




Exhibit 10.7


Director Compensation Summary


The members of the Lionsgate’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) who are not employees of Lionsgate (the “Non-Employee Directors”) receive an annual retainer of $50,000, an award of restricted share units with a grant date value of $50,000 granted annually on the date of the Lionsgate’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and a fee of $1,400 for each meeting of a committee on which a Non-Employee Director is a member and attends, in person or via teleconference or videoconference. The restricted share units vest in annual installments over three years following the date of grant and are paid upon vesting in an equivalent number of Lionsgate common shares (the “Shares”).  Additionally, the non-employee Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual retainer of $52,000, the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000, and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, and the Chairman of the Strategic Advisory Committee of the Board each receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. 


The retainers and fees for the Non-Employee Directors are paid, at the director’s election, either 50% in cash and 50% in the form of Shares, or 100% in the form of Shares. Retainers are paid in two installments each year, with the number of Shares to be delivered in payment of any retainer to be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the retainer to be paid in the form of Shares by the average closing price of Shares for the previous five business days prior to payment.


Lionsgate requires that Non-Employee Directors maintain an ownership position in Lionsgate of at least $150,000 of Shares; provided, however, that new directors shall have three years from their initial election to the Board to reach this ownership threshold. Pursuant to Lionsgate’s policies, directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Devon Energy Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference herein of our report dated November 8,
2000, relating to the supplemental consolidated balance sheets of Devon Energy
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related
supplemental consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which report appears in the August 29, 2000 report on Form 8-K of Devon
Energy Corporation and to the related reference to our firm under the heading
"Experts" in the Registration Statement.

KPMG LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
November 14, 2000
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of National Investment Managers Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 16, 2009
                        /s/
      Steven J. RossSteven
      J. RossChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      November 16, 2009
                        /s/
      Christopher W. LarkinChristopher
      W. LarkinChief
      Financial
Officer