alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53703-53704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 53704]]


    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: September 14, 2010.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 
4069, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 
9306, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-402-0838.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 26, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-21819 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          66,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,830
<PP&E>                                         140,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,844
<COMMON>                                        23,774
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,822,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (361,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (361,714)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (361,714)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        




</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN E. NICHADOWICZ.

February 11, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Kirk Blosch certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of OCIS CORP.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors, any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 26, 2007                  /s/ Kirk Blosch
                                        --------------------------------
                                         Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1336
<SECURITIES>                                        44
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14662
<PP&E>                                            7864
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6684
<BONDS>                                           1316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1760
<PREFERRED>                                        305
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       11328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21394
<SALES>                                           3387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4617
<CGS>                                             3850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (785)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   3078
<CHANGES>                                         1318
<NET-INCOME>                                      1318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
#### RAYMOND GERALD v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

October 29, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 201 *N.J.Super.*438)
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Odell NELSON, a/k/a Kenneth W. Finley, Defendant-Appellant.

No. KCD 27194.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District.

July 7, 1975.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied Aug. 5, 1975.

*57Willard B. Bunch, Public Defender, Robert A. Simons, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for defendant-appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before WASSERSTROM, P. J., and SHANGLER and DIXON, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

On May 11, 1973, a grand jury returned an indictment against Odell Nelson, charging him with robbery, first degree. More specifically, it was charged that Nelson did, on April 24, 1973, make an assault on one Ronald McDonald with a loaded .38 caliber revolver and, by putting McDonald in fear of immediate injury to his person, robbed, stole, took and carried away $100 which was in the care and custody of McDonald. On September 20, 1973, the State was granted leave to file an amended information in lieu of this indictment. The amended information charged Kenneth W. Finley, a/k/a Odell Nelson, under the Second Offender Act with robbery, first degree in the aforementioned particulars. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the court, after overruling the motion for new trial and duly granting allocution, sentenced the defendant to seven years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. The defendant has appealed claiming that (1) certain evidence was inadmissible, and that (2) he was unduly prejudiced when the jury was made aware that he had an alias. We rule that these issues have not been preserved for appellate review.

Rule 27.20(a), V.A.M.R. requires that a motion for a new trial in a criminal case be filed within ten days after the verdict is returned. That rule also provides that the trial court may, upon application, extend the time a maximum of thirty additional days. The record of this case reveals that the jury verdict was returned September 24, 1973, and on the same date defendant was given thirty days in which to file a motion for new trial. No application for a further extension was made. The motion for new trial was filed on October 30, 1973, the 36th day after the verdict and order.

Compliance with Rule 27.20(a) is mandatory, and a motion for new trial not filed within the time fixed by the trial court is a nullity and preserves nothing for review. The motion for new trial in this case was not filed within the time fixed by the trial court, was not timely and, hence, preserved nothing for review. *State v. Clark,*432 S.W.2d 279 (Mo.1968); *State v. Hamilton,*391 S.W.2d 872 (Mo.1965); *State v. Howard,*476 S.W.2d 587 (Mo.1972).

Pursuant to Rule 28.02, we have reviewed the sufficiency of the information, verdict, and judgment and sentence — matters of record which require no assignment of error.

The information is sufficient and the verdict is responsive to the offense charged. The sentence was within the statutory limits, allocution was granted, and the judgment is in proper form.

*58The judgment is affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 First Japanese F-35A arrives at LukePublished Dec. 2, 2016
                        
                        By Maj. Elizabeth Magnusson
                        
                        
                        944th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The F-35 program hit another milestone Nov. 28 with the arrival of the first foreign military sales F-35 here.The arrival marked the next step for the international F-35 training program as Japan took ownership of the first FMS aircraft to arrive at Luke Air Force Base.“Today is a great day for the U.S. Air Force Reserve Command, Luke AFB, the 944th Fighter Wing, and the Japanese Air Self-Defense (Force),” said Col. Kurt J. Gallegos, the 944th FW commander. “We have a great team of Airmen who have worked hard to set up an outstanding training program and are ready to train our FMS counterparts.”The aircraft was welcomed by a joint delegation from the 944th and 56th Fighter Wings, Lockheed Martin, and Japanese staff.“Today I am thrilled for the Japan Air Self-Defense Force and (Luke AFB),” said Lt. Col. Sean Holahan, the commander of Detachment 2, 944th Operations Group. “The arrival of Japan’s first F-35A marks another important milestone in the steadfast relationship between our two nations, and the beginning of training for an elite cadre of JASDF fighter pilots and maintainers. We put an incredible amount of thought and effort into building the world’s first F-35 foreign military sales training program from the ground up. To see Japan’s first jet on our flightline, surrounded by the men and women who have made this mission possible, is humbling.”The arrival of the first FMS aircraft is the culmination of years of planning and hard work.“The jet arrival marks the beginning of a new and exciting mission at Luke AFB to train our allies to fly the F-35A,” explained Lt. Col. Joe Bemis, the executive officer and resource advisor for Det. 2, 944th OG. “We have been preparing for this program for years. We have remodeled buildings, built a huge team of professional pilots, maintainers, and administration staff, and created specialized syllabus. We are hopeful that this mission will strengthen relationships between the US and nations that participate in the training.”Over the next several years, Luke AFB will be training FMS pilots from Japan, Israel and South Korea along with partner nations including Australia, Italy, Norway, Turkey, Netherlands, Denmark and Canada.“This is such an important time in our wing’s history as we pick up the mission to train all FMS F-35 pilots,” Gallegos said. “It’s been almost 10 years since our wing has seen aircraft on our flightline. It is an amazing feeling to look outside and see the F-35s out there and know that we are playing such an important and critical role as we build relationships that will enhance our future partnership.” In addition to the Luke AFB is scheduled to have six fighter squadrons and 144 F-35s.Japan 



PACAF 



Luke AFB 



F-35
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 70-7015-ML; ASLBP No. 10-899-02-ML-BD01]

                    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) in the above-captioned                     *Areva Enrichment Services*                     proceeding is hereby reconstituted by appointing Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III, to serve as Board Chair in place of Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin, whose other assignments have rendered him unavailable to participate in this proceeding.                

                    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule.                     *See*10 CFR 2.302*et seq.*

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of August 2010.

E. Roy Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-21515 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
      
<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1
       
<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                   226,292
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          1,757,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             144,540
<INVENTORY>                                                            1,326,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       3,343,496
<PP&E>                                                                 1,433,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         1,151,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         4,820,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  1,408,520
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                                   3,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             5,564,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           4,820,160
<SALES>                                                                1,964,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       1,964,727
<CGS>                                                                  1,075,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          1,882,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          10,274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        15,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           66,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              14,854
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       51,640
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              118
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              51,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .01
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. GEORGE

No. 324P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 717

Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 July 2001.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-110676) of our report dated March 16, 2006 relating tothe financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, of SafetyInsurance Group, Inc., which appears in Safety Insurance Group, Inc.’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 16, 2006

----