alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.10
















CONSENT OF JÉRÔME LAVOIE







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Jérôme Lavoie, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2013 Exploration Program, Wabamisk Project, Quebec” completed in March 2014; and




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Winter 2013 Drilling Program, Lac Pau Project, Québec” completed in September 2013; 




concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau-Wabamisk and Lac Pau properties for the Company (collectively the “Reports”). Portions of the Reports are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.2.4 Geological Settings; 3.2.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.2.6 Mineralization as for the Anatacau-Wabamisk property and under headings Description of the Business – 3.3.4 Geological Setting; 3.3.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.3.6 Mineralization” for the Lac Pau property, in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,














				
	 
	/S/

Jérôme Lavoie

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

Jérôme Lavoie, M.Sc.A., Eng.

	 
	 












May 15, 2014
Opinion filed February 7, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-18-00121-CR

___________

DANIEL OLIVARES EQUINIONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 385th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR48578

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Based upon an open plea of guilty, the trial court convicted Appellant, Daniel 

Olivares Equiniones, of the offense of credit card or debit card abuse. After finding 

the enhancement allegations to be true, the trial court assessed Appellant’s

punishment at confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The 

motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously 
2

examines the record and applicable law and concludes that this appeal is frivolous 

and without merit. Counsel has provided Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy 

of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s

record. Counsel advised Appellant of his right to review the record and file a 

response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to file a 

petition for discretionary review in order to seek review by the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4, 68. Court-appointed counsel has 

complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967);

Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 

403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1991). 

Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the 

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.

1

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial 

court.

PER CURIAM

February 7, 2019

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.2

Willson, J., not participating.

 1

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 68.

2

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00059-CR

Gregg Wesley Macintosh

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1280735D)

March 20, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas J. Holland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 2, 2010



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ N.J. Holland                           
|Nicholas J. Holland Chief
Executive Officer
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of                1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of                operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 14, 2008 | By:    | */s/                Bryan                Chance             * |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Bryan                Chance                                                                                                    |
|                                |   | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                         |

----
Exhibit 99.4

Managements Annual Report

on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. With our participation, an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was conducted as of December 31, 2007, based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    TROY H.
LOWRIE                                           
|Troy H. Lowrie Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2008



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    DONALD W. PROSSER                                        
|Donald W. Prosser Interim Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

April 15, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1.

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Kirk Blosch, Chief Executive Officer of OCIS Corp. (the "Registrant") do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period December 31, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                            By: /s/ Kirk Blosch
                                             -------------------------------
                                            Kirk Blosch
                                              Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 2007

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to OCIS Corp. and will be retained by OCIS Corp. and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM HOUTH.

September 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS



I, Herbert M. Lustig, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Invisa, Inc. ("Invisa");

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Invisa
as of and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. Invisa's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for Invisa and have:

         a.  Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
material   information   relating   to  Invisa,   including   its   consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b.  Evaluated the  effectiveness  of Invisa's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c.  Presented  in  this  annual  report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. Invisa's other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most
recent  evaluation,  to Invisa's  auditors  and the audit  committee of Invisa's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a. All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which could  adversely  affect  Invisa's  ability to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for Invisa's  auditors
any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in Invisa's internal controls; and

6. Invisa's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most  recent  evaluation,  including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 12 , 2004                            /s/ Herbert M. Lustig
                                                 ---------------------
                                                     Herbert M. Lustig
                                                     President
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/3 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date:  May 14, 2008    
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date:  May 14, 2008    





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132405(21)(22)(23) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, RANDAZZO MECHANI CAL HEATING Justices & COOLING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132405 COA: 269438 Macomb CC: 05-004843-AV VINCENT DILORENZO and ANGELA 41-A Dist Ct: US-03-81304-GC TINERVIA, d/b/a D & T CONSTRUCTION, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

The motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of January 4, 2007 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not ap pear that the order was ent ered erroneously. The motion for continuation of stay is DENIED as moot.

l0306 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2007

Clerk
D ORIGINA1 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

HELENA, MONTANA 59620-3003 

Supreme Court No. 

DA 22-0585 

TIMOTHY J. WHALEN, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

and ELIZABETH BRIDGES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BEARTOOTH ELECTRIC CO-OP, INC., 

Defendant and Appellee. 

FILED 

DEC 2 9 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

GRANT OF EXTENSION 

Pursuant to authority granted under M. R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension of time 

until January 30, 2023, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's brief. 

DATED this December 29, 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of the Supreme Court 

c: Timothy Joseph Whalen, Maxon R. Davis, Geoffrey R. Keller 

PO BOX 203003 • HELENA MT • 59620-3003 • TELEPHONE: (406) 444-3858 • FAX: (406) 444-5705 

12/29/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0585
#### The State, ex rel. Newcomer, *v.*Board of Education of Williams County School District. The State, ex rel. Adsmond, *v.*Board of Education of Williams County School District.

(Decided April 18, 1938.)

*Messrs. Newcomer & Parker,*for relators.

*Mr. Lorin L. Hogue*and *Messrs. Knepper, White S Dempsey,*for respondents.

Carpenter, J.

These are original actions in mandamus in this court. They involve the same questions and will, so far as this opinion is concerned, be treated as one.

On the afternoon of February 21, 1938, under authority of Section 4696, General Code, the relators filed separate petitions with the County Board of Education of Williams county, asking that certain territory in Center and in Pulaski Township Rural School Districts be transferred to the Village of Bryan School District, a district exempted from the county district. The relators claimed their petitions contained the sig*38natures of more than seventy-five per cent of the electors residing in the respective territories sought to be transferred. With these petitions there were filed certified copies of resolutions of the Board of Education of the village of Bryan indicating its willingness to accept the transfers of territory to it. On receipt of the petitions, the county board ordered “that a poll of the electors' of the territory in each of the said petitions” be taken, and adjourned to February 26, 1938, at which meeting a committee for each of the two township districts was appointed to take the poll.

When the petitions were not granted by the county board instanter, the relators, in behalf of thems'elves and other petitioners, on the same afternoon, February 21, 1938, filed these actions and obtained alternative writs of mandamus'.

At the next meeting of the county board, March 8, 1938, after receiving reports of the polls taken in the territories, and the withdrawal petitions of signers on relators’ petitions, it found, among other things, that there were not left on the petitions valid signatures in number equal to seventy-five per cent of the resident electors of the respective territories, and rejected the petitions.

When this cause came on for hearing before this court, various reasons were urged by the county board why peremptory writs should not issue. Without deciding all of the questions thus raised, the court finds one of them well taken, to wit, that these actions w'ere prematurely brought.

After the petitions in question had been filed with the county board, it had the right and the duty to determine the validity and sufficiency of them. To do this, some time for examination and investigation was necessary, and until it had such opportunity, the *39board was' not subject or liable to actions in mandamus. .

For the reasons that these actions were prematurely brought, peremptory writs are denied.

*Writs denied.*

Lloyd and Overmyer, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2431 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2431

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2014

 Mr. Isakson (for himself and Mr. Chambliss) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Hunter Street Baptist Church 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of the historic West Hunter Street Baptist Church, 
located at 775 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, SW., Atlanta, Georgia.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the area as a unit of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, State, 
        or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit 
        organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 8 of Public Law 91-383 (16 
U.S.C. 1a-5; commonly known as the ``National Park Service General 
Authorities Act'').
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```