alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Reliv’ International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert L. Montgomery, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D. Albright, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert L. MontgomeryRobert L. MontgomeryChief Executive OfficerDate: May 13, 2011/s/ Steven D. AlbrightSteven D. AlbrightChief Financial Officer





Date: May 13, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: March 7Published March 7, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, acting Air Force Secretary Lisa S. Disbrow talks about the Air Force review and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright answers a question about the possibility of enlisted Airmen flying MQ-9 Reapers. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jevon Smith.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related stories:
- Disbrow delivers State of the AF
- Wright: Airmen need to be ‘well trained, well led, resilient'ATAF 



AFA 



CMSAF 



SecAF 



MQ-9
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1843** 

KATHLEEN DEWEESE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , Chief District Judge. ( 3:15

- cv - 16210 )

Submitted : December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Hoyt Eric Glazer, LAW OFFICE OF HOYT GLAZER, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellant. Carol A. Casto, United States Attorney, Jennifer M. Mankins, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kathleen DeWeese appeals the district court’s order granting Carolyn W. Colvin’s motion to dismiss DeWeese’s claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 ( West 2008 & Supp. 2016 ) ; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 6 21 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 201 6) ; and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s judgment

. See DeWeese v. Colvin , No. 3:15

- cv 16210 ( S.D.W. Va. June 24, 2016 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL NEGER.

May 24, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EX-10.74



 Exhibit 10.74 

STOCK CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 

This STOCK CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of April 1, 2013, by and between GE
Consumer Finance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“GECFI”), and GE Capital Retail Finance Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“RF HoldCo”). 

WHEREAS, GECFI and RF HoldCo agree and intend that GECFI will transfer to RF HoldCo certain Retail Finance assets (including stock of one or
more subsidiaries) owned by GECFI in a series of transfers; 
 WHEREAS, GECFI owns all of the issued and outstanding stock of GE Capital
Retail Bank, a federal savings bank (the “Interests”); 
 WHEREAS, GECFI desires, as an initial transfer by GECFI, to
contribute to the capital of RF HoldCo by transferring all of its rights, title and interests in, to and under the Interests, and RF HoldCo desires to accept the rights, title and interests in, to and under the Interests from GECFI; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Contribution of the Interests. GECFI hereby transfers to RF
HoldCo, as a contribution to the capital of RF HoldCo, all of its rights, title and interests in, to and under the Interests (the “Contribution”). RF HoldCo hereby acknowledges receipt of and accepts the Contribution. 

2. Tax Matters. The parties intend that the Contribution contemplated by this Agreement constitutes a tax-free contribution pursuant to
section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and a tax-free reorganization described in Code section 368(a)(1)(B). 

3. Further Assurances. From time to time after the date hereof, upon reasonable notice and without further consideration, each party
shall execute, acknowledge and deliver all such other documents and shall take all such other action as may be necessary or appropriate, in the reasonable judgment of the other party, to carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. 
 4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof. 
 5. Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, which together shall be deemed to constitute one original, and shall become effective when one or more counterparts shall have been signed by each party and delivered to the other party. 

[Signature page follows] 

GECFI-GECRFC Contribution Agreement 
 (GECRB Stock) – April
1, 2013 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date
first above written. 
  

			
	GE CONSUMER FINANCE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Margaret Keane

	Name:	 	Margaret Keane
	Title:	 	Chairman, President & CEO
	
	GE CAPITAL RETAIL FINANCE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian Doubles

	Name:	 	Brian Doubles
	Title:	 	Vice President, CFO & Treasurer


 GECFI-GECRFC Contribution Agreement 

(GECRB Stock) – April 1, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Intent to Terminate (Withdraw) EIS.

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process for a proposed highway project examining both new highway alignments and infrastructure improvements to enhance transportation mobility and accessibility through and around Skowhegan in the Towns of Skowhegan and Madison, Maine is terminated (withdrawn). The original Notice of Intent for this EIS process was published in the **Federal Register** on November 29, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Hasselmann, Right of Way and Environmental Programs Manager, Federal Highway Administration, Maine Division, 40 Western Avenue, Augusta, Maine 04330, Telephone (207) 622-8350, extension 103; or Judy Lindsey, Project Manager, Maine Department of Transportation, State House Station 16, Augusta, Maine 04333-0016, Telephone (207) 624-3291.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FHWA, in cooperation with the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), has terminated the EIS process begun in 2005 to address mobility and accessibility needs through and around Skowhegan, Somerset County, Maine. Work on the EIS is being discontinued due to adverse economic and environmental impacts, lack of community support, and a lack of design and construction funds. Therefore, the EIS for this project has been terminated. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations       ( print page 54221)    implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

Authority:23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48

Issued on: August 25, 2010.

Cheryl B. Martin,

Assistant Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Augusta, Maine.

[FR Doc. 2010-21811 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK S. MUSZYNSKI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. L. RUNNELS; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15808

D.C. No. 2:04-cv-00082-JAMGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Mark S. Muszynski, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration following a settlement

agreement in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a

FILED

JUL 1 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15808

motion to reconsider. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5

F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Muszynski’s

motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 because Muszynski did not

present any newly discovered evidence, nor did he advance any other viable

ground for relief. See id. at 1263; Coastal Transfer Co. v. Toyota Motor Sales,

U.S.A., 833 F.2d 208, 212 (9th Cir. 1987) (evidence is not “newly discovered” if it

was in the moving party’s possession prior to judgment).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Muszynski’s contentions concerning the

underlying merits of this action because it was voluntarily dismissed without

prejudice. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1507 (9th Cir. 1995) (voluntary

dismissal without prejudice is not appealable).

We deny Muszynski’s request in his reply brief for appointment of counsel.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




I,
      Jay O.
      Wright, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of MobilePro Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
      (the
“Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MobilePro Corp.
      for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.


Dated:August
                  14, 2008
              By:/s/
                  Jay O. WrightJay
                  O. Wright, Chief Executive
                  Officer




I,
      Donald
      L. Paliwoda, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MobilePro Corp. for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2008 (the “Form 10-Q”), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      MobilePro Corp. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.




Dated:August
                  14, 2008
              By:/s/
                  Donald L. PaliwodaDonald
                  L. Paliwoda, Chief Accounting
                  Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,793
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,421
<INVENTORY>                                    133,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,421
<PP&E>                                         273,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 611,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,362
<BONDS>                                        284,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   611,998
<SALES>                                        791,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               791,752
<CGS>                                          263,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  766,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,231
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James W. McLane, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Jimmy D. Taylor, Chief Financial Officer,
do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. By: /s/ James W. McLane  James W. McLane
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004 By: /s/ Jimmy D. Taylor  Jimmy D. Taylor
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004 Page 27 of 27
Exhibit 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by CapSource Financial,
Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Fred C. Boethling, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CapSource
Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: September 16, 2003                   By: /s/ Steven J. Kutcher
                                               ------------------------------
                                           Name: Steven J. Kutcher
                                           Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41485

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES ANTHONY FANTOZZI,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC Nos. C-03-CV-223

and C-01-CR-135-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Anthony Fantozzi, federal prisoner # 45227-083,

requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as timebarred. He argues that the district court erred in using the date

of the finality of his conviction as the starting date for the oneyear time limit for filing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, rather than

the later date on which he discovered that his trial counsel had
2

failed to perfect his appeal. He seeks a COA to present his claim

that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his

trial counsel failed to perfect his direct appeal, among other

claims.

However, the record shows that on March 15, 2002, Fantozzi

filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal

following the entry of the judgment of conviction and within the

10-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal, which clearly

evinced his intent to file a direct appeal. See Mosley v. Cozby,

813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Consequently, Fantozzi’s motion

to proceed IFP should be construed as a timely notice of direct

appeal from the judgment of conviction, and we will not consider

the arguments raised in Fantozzi’s COA application because “[a]

motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 will not be

entertained during the pendency of a direct appeal, inasmuch as the

disposition of the appeal may render the motion moot.” Welsh v.

United States, 404 F.2d 333, 333 (5th Cir. 1968), abrogated on

other grounds, United States v. Ortega, 859 F.2d 327, 334 (5th Cir.

1988).

Accordingly, we grant COA and vacate the district court’s

order denying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief and judgment entered on

September 24, 2003, and its order denying Fantozzi’s motion for

reconsideration entered on October 31, 2003. On remand, the

district court is instructed to (1) dismiss Fantozzi’s 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion without prejudice; (2) construe Fantozzi’s motion for
3

leave to proceed IFP on appeal filed on March 15, 2002, as a timely

notice of direct appeal of its judgment entered on March 14, 2002;

and (3) direct its clerk to file Fantozzi’s motion for leave to

proceed IFP on appeal filed on March 15, 2002, as a notice of

direct appeal from the district court’s judgment entered on

March 14, 2002. 

APPLICATION FOR COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.