alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEVIN ALEXANDER SCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00581-GLR-1; 1:16-cv-01930-GLR)

Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 23, 2022

Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Alexander Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6525 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Alexander Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion and his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan 

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it 

has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) 

(internal quotation marks omitted).

Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the 

claims raised in the motion. Id. at 696-97. Specifically, the court failed to address whether 

Scott’s designation as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines remains valid 

following Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015).1

 We conclude that the order 

Scott seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral 

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district 

court for consideration of the unresolved claim.2

 Id. at 699. 

1 The district court denied Scott’s motion for appointment of counsel (after his 

appointed counsel moved to withdraw) on the basis that Scott had “failed to articulate 

specific facts” to support his career offender claim that he referenced in his motion for

appointment of counsel. However, the record shows that this claim was specifically and 

thoroughly raised in his § 2255 motion. 

2 We express no opinion on the merits of the claim. 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6525 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6525 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RASHAUN LEATHERBERY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 296 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 99.4









|KPMG LLP                       | Telephone (306) 934-6200
|------------------------------ | ------------------------
|Chartered Accountants          | Fax  (306) 934-6233     
|600-128 4th Avenue South       | Internet www.kpmg.ca    
|Saskatoon Saskatchewan S7K 1M8 |                         
|Canada                         |                         



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors of Claude Resources
Inc.



We consent to the use in this annual
report on Form 40-F/A (Amendment No. 1) of:



| | ─ | our report dated March 30, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Claude
Resources Inc. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31,
2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity
and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes comprising a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information, and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ─ | our report dated March 30, 2012 with respect to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



each of which is included or incorporated
by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F/A (Amendment No. 1).











Chartered Accountants

May 4, 2012

Saskatoon, Canada







KPMG LLP, is a Canadian limited liability partnership
and a member firm of the KPMG

network of independent member firms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative

(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         000770471
<NAME>                        VENTURES-NATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,543
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       590,222
<OTHER-SE>                                    (591,765)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,427)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2010-N-0389]


Medical Device User Fee Act; Public Meeting; Request for 
Comments; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
amendment to the notice of a public meeting on the reauthorization of 
the medical device user fee program. This meeting was announced in the 
Federal Register of August 13, 2010 (75 FR 49502). The amendment is 
being made to include the exact meeting location, previously identified 
only as the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. There are no other 
changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  James Swink, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 1609, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6313, FAX: 
301-847-8121, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#206a414d45530e7357494e4b604644410e4848530e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="511b303c34227f0226383f3a113735307f3939227f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  In the Federal Register of August 13, 2010 
(75 FR 49502), FDA announced that a public meeting on the 
reauthorization of the medical device user fee program would be held on 
September 14, 2010. On page 49503, in the first column, the Location 
portion of the document is changed to read as follows:
    Location: The meeting will be held at the Marriott Inn and 
Conference Center, University of Maryland University College (UMUC), 
3501 University Blvd. East, Hyattsville, MD 20783, www.marriott.com/wasum.

    Dated: August 27, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010-21800 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-41393

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO JAVIER GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CR-484-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Javier Gonzalez has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 16, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-41393 Document: 00512021218 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2012
No. 11-41393

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-41393 Document: 00512021218 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2012
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JULIUS MOORE.

May 14, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of REMEC, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies that:



|1. |  | The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RONALD E.
RAGLANDRonald E. Ragland Chairman and Chief Executive Officer






/s/    DAVID L.
MORASHDavid L. Morash Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




Date: June 16, 2003
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of Titan Global Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Curtis Okumura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Titan Global Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Global Holdings,
      Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Date: May
              16,
              2006
            By:
            /s/ *Curtis
              Okumura*Curtis
              OkumuraChief
              Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES A. BURNETT.

May 14, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 198 *N.J.Super.*53)
#### GARY F. FOX v. THE TOWNSHIP OF PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS.

May 30, 1985.

Petition for certification denied. (See 199 *N.J.Super.*82)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM K. 

MCALEER, DECEASED

PETITION OF: WILLIAM MCALEER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 345 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Do the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrines protect 

communications between a trustee and counsel from discovery by beneficiaries 

when the communications arose in the context of adversarial proceedings between 

the trustees and beneficiaries?
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND
(b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify
with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Form 20-F”) that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | (1) | the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:	November 12, 2013









“James E. Sinclair”

James E. Sinclair,

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)







“Steven Van Tongeren”

Steven Van Tongeren

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEFFREY COLLINS.

July 10, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EX-4.01



 Exhibit 4.01 
  






 
 DELAWARE _ SEAL GOPRO, INC. CORPORATE August 24, 2011 Fully paid and nonassessable shares of Class A common
stock, $0.0001 par value, OF GoPro, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: This certifies that is the record holder of Incorporated under the laws of the state of
delaware CUSIP 38268T 10 3 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS Countersigned and Registered: American Stock transfer & trust company, LLC (New York, NY) Transfer Agent and Registrar By: Authorized signature General Counsel & Corporate
Secretary President & Chief Executive Officer GP NUMBER Be a Hero GOPRO shares 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants
with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common COM PROP – as community property UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act.............................................................................. (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT – ................. Custodian (until age ..................) (Cust) ..................................... under Uniform Transfers (Minor)
to Minors Act............................................................ (State) FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee shares of the capital stock
represented by within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of the substitution in the premises. Dated Notice: The
signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change what so ever . By The signature(s) should be guaranteed by an eligible
guarantor institution, (Banks, stockbrokers, savings and loan associations and credit unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee medalion program ), pursuant to s.e.c. rule 17ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED. Signature(s) Guaranteed: (Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code, of assignee) X X
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CAE Inc. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the
Report).

I, Robert E. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(i)  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|    

/s/ Robert E. BrownRobert E. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 28, 2005

---
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: July 12Published July 14, 2017
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) -- On this look around the Air Force, Air National Guard Airmen battle California wildfires, F-16s arrive in England for a flying training deployment, and fiscal year 2018 first-term Airmen retraining quotas are released. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden.
For previous episodes, click **here**.
Related stories:
- Liberty wing welcomes Warhawks
- Liberty wing welcomes Warhawks
- Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System
- MAFFS 6 battles Whittier Fire blazing in Southern California
- Air Force releases first-term Airman retraining quotas for FY18Air National Guard 



ANG 



England 



United Kingdom 



UK 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



A1C JasmineVanderheyden 



Fighting Wildfires 



Flying Training Deployment 



Retraining Quotas 



RAFLakenheath 



ATAF 



California
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0502

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NICHOLAS LEE WINZENBURG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 14, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2021

05/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0502