alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PFGI CAPITAL CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of PFGI Capital Corporation
(PFGI Capital) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
Report), I, Anthony M. Stollings, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) of PFGI Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PFGI Capital.

/s/ Anthony M. Stollings
Anthony M. Stollings
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

March 9, 2004

[A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PFGI Capital Corporation and will
be retained by PFGI Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Naveen S. Bisht, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nayna Networks, Inc.
(the "Company");

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's period
covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting; and

(5) The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2005                   By: /s/ Naveen S. Bisht
                                            -----------------------
                                            Naveen S. Bisht,
                                            Principal Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 24, 2010 

p1117 

Order 

 

November 24, 2010 

141298 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141298 

 COA: 295570 

Oakland CC: 2007-218331-FH 

JOSEPH ALBERTO GENTILE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development
Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

March 30, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MTC Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    March 2, 2004



/s/    DAVID S. GUTRIDGEDavid S. Gutridge Chief Executive Officer




/s/    MICHAEL GEARHARDTMichael Gearhardt Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1921 

To amend the American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996 to extend the 

authorization for that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Mr. WEBB (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. LOTT, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. WARNER, Mrs. 

LINCOLN, Mr. BURR, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mrs. MCCASKILL, and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996 

to extend the authorization for that Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil War Battlefield 

5 Preservation Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1921 IS

1 (1) Civil War battlefields provide a means for 

2 the people of the United States to understand a 

3 tragic period in the history of the United States. 

4 (2) According to the Report on the Nation’s 

5 Civil War Battlefields, prepared by the Civil War 

6 Sites Advisory Commission, and dated July 1993, of 

7 the 384 principal Civil War battlefields— 

8 (A) almost 20 percent are lost or frag9 mented; 

10 (B) 17 percent are in poor condition; and 

11 (C) 60 percent have been lost or are in im12 minent danger of being fragmented by develop13 ment and lost as coherent historic sites. 

14 (b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act are— 

15 (1) to act quickly and proactively to preserve 

16 and protect nationally significant Civil War battle17 fields through conservation easements and fee-simple 

18 purchases of those battlefields from willing sellers at 

19 fair market value; 

20 (2) to create partnerships among State and 

21 local governments, regional entities, and the private 

22 sector to preserve, conserve, and enhance nationally 

23 significant Civil War battlefields; and 

24 (3) to prepare our Nation for the upcoming ses25 quicentennial commemoration of the Civil War, 2011 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•S 1921 IS

1 through 2015, which is expected to stimulate re2 newed interest in the conflict and generate unprece3 dented visitation to preserved Civil War battle4 grounds. 

5 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION EXTENDED. 

6 The American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996 (16 

7 U.S.C. 469k) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (d)(7)(A), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

9 years 2004 through 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 

10 years 2009 through 2013’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘September 

12 30, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2013’’. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
#### PATEL v. STONE

No. 400P00

Case below: 138 N.C. App. 693

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.
| (1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of MegaWest Energy Corp. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MegaWest Energy Corp. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  September 24, 2009 |   |                                  |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |                                  |
|                                 |   |                                  |
|                                 |   |   //S/ William Thornton     |   |   |
|                                 |   | R. William Thornton                   |
|                                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |   | MegaWest Energy Corp.                 |
|                                 |   |                                  |
|                                 |   |                                  |
|                                 |   |   //s/ Farid Naghiyev            |   |   |
|                                 |   | Farid Naghiyev                        |
|                                 |   | Finance Manager and Controller        |
|                                 |   | MegaWest Energy Corp.                 |
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 9, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.211 Municipal Securities and Loans** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
sbid_ex1014.htm


EXHIBIT 10.14


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


 


SUBSCRIPTION ESCROW AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment to the Subscription Escrow Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of February 6, 2014, by and among the Issuer, Depositor and Escrow Agent.  This Amendment amends the Subscription Escrow Agreement by and among the Issuer, Depositor and Escrow Agent, dated as of September 9, 2013, as amended November 15, 2013 (collectively referred to as the “Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 


The fourth recital of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


WHEREAS, Units will be offered through March 31, 2014 (the “Offering Period”);


 


This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which may be executed by less than all of the parties and shall be deemed to be an original instrument which shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The exchange of copies of this Amendment and of signature pages by facsimile transmission or in pdf format shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Amendment as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Amendment for all purposes. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile or in pdf format shall be deemed to be their original signatures for all purposes.


 


This Amendment is hereby made part of and incorporated into the Subscription Escrow Agreement, with all the terms and conditions of the Agreement remaining in full force and effect, except to the extent modified hereby.  The Parties agree for and on behalf of their respective party this 6th day of February, 2014.


 


SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW


 




  





1











  






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


CSC Trust Company of Delaware


as Escrow Agent


 


By: /s/ Alan R. Halpern                                           


Name:  Alan R. Halpern


Title:  Vice President


 


SYMBID CORP.


 


By: /s/ Korstiaan Zandvliet                                                      


 


Name:  Korstiaan Zandvliet


Title:  Chief Executive Officer


 


DEPOSITOR


 


Gottbetter Capital Markets, LLC


 


By: /s/ Julio A. Marquez                                                      


Name:  Julio A. Marquez


Title:  President







 


2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 70-7015-ML; ASLBP No. 10-899-02-ML-BD01]


Areva Enrichment Services, LLC (Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility); 
Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board (Board) in the above-captioned Areva Enrichment 
Services proceeding is hereby reconstituted by appointing 
Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III, to serve as Board Chair in 
place of Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin, whose other assignments 
have rendered him unavailable to participate in this proceeding.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue 
to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302 
et seq.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of August 2010.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-21515 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 30, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00937

- CR

RAYMOND FIELD , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1310214



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant entered a guilty plea to arson . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on July 11, 2012 , to confinement for three years in the Institutional Di vision of the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice. No motion for new trial was filed. On July 24, 2012, appellant filed a

pro se notice of appeal. The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which
the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of2

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is inc luded in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s
certification. S ee Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
On September 6, 2012, a written request to withdraw the notice of appeal, personally signed by appellant, w as filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. This court granted the request
, an d on September 18, 2012, this court issued a memorandum opinion dismissing the appeal

. See Field v. State, No. 14

- 12

- 00712

- CR (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 18, 2012, no pet. ) (not designated for publication).
On October 1, 2012, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in the trial court in an attempt to appeal the same judgment of conviction. The new appeal was assigned to this court. In his notice of appeal, appellant states that the trial court granted permission to appeal. The judgment recites
, however, that no permission to appeal was granted. In addition, the trial court certified that appellant has no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

T he notice of appeal filed October 1, 2012, is untimely to appeal from the July 11, 2012, jud gment and sentence. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal i s not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal , and u nder those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIA M

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fast Eddie Racing Stables,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 1997 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A. Little,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 4, 2004                       By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                          ---------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fast Eddie Racing  Stables,  Inc. and will be retained by Fast Eddie
Racing Stables,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate Distric t of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 21

- 00 117

- CR

_____________

______________

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1269 829D

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.

M emorandu m Opinion by Justice Walker 

### K EVIN 

### D UANE 

### T ALKINGTON



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Kevin Du ane Talkington attem pts to appeal from the trial court ’ s

order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel to assist him in o btaining

postconvi ction , forensic DNA testing. See Tex. Co de Crim. Proc. An n. art. 64 .01(c).

W e noti fied Talking ton of our b elief th at we d o not have jurisdiction over his appeal

because such an order is not immediately appealable and gave him an opportu nity to

respond s howing grounds to continue his appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3; Gutierrez v.

S t ate

, 307 S.W.3d 318, 323 (Tex. Cri m . App. 2010) ; see also Whitfield v. State

, 430 S.W.3d

405, 408 n.11 (Tex. Crim. App . 2014)

. Al though we granted T a lking ton an extension

to respond, he has failed to do so

. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdictio n. See

Tex. R. A p p. P. 43.2(f); Guti errez , 307 S.W.3d at 323.

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker
Justice

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered : November 24 , 2021