53376 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices 

In addressing the specific content 

requirements of 543.6, Chrysler 

provided information on the reliability 

and durability of the device. Chrysler 

conducted tests based on its own 

specified standards and stated its belief 

that the device meets the stringent 

performance standards prescribed. 

Specifically, Chrysler stated that its 

device must demonstrate a minimum of 

95 percent reliability with 90 percent 

confidence. In addition to the design 

and production validation test criteria, 

Chrysler stated that the SKIS device also 

undergoes a daily short term durability 

test and 100 percent of its systems 

undergo a series of three functional tests 

for durability prior to being shipped 

from the supplier to the vehicle 

assembly plant for installation in its 

vehicles. 

Chrysler also stated that each ignition 

key used in the SKIS device has an 

integral transponder chip included on 

the circuit board beneath the cover of 

the integral Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) 

transmitter. Chrysler further stated that 

in addition to having to be cut to match 

the mechanical coding of the ignition 

lock cylinder and programmed for 

operation of the RKE system, each new 

Sentry Key has a unique transponder 

identification code that is permanently 

programmed into it by the 

manufacturer, and must be programmed 

into the SKREEM to be recognized by 

the SKIS device as a valid key. Chrysler 

stated that once a transponder key has 

been programmed to a particular 

vehicle, it cannot be used on any other 

vehicle. 

Chrysler stated that while there is no 

theft data available for the Fiat 500 

because it is a new vehicle line 

introduction, the theft rate experience of 

the Jeep Grand Cherokee which has 

been installed with the SKIS 

immobilizer device since MY 1999 

indicates that it is projected to have a 

theft rate lower than the median theft 

rate. Chrysler stated that NHTSA’s theft 

rate data for the Jeep Grand Cherokee 

indicates that the inclusion of a 

standard immobilizer system has 

resulted in a 52.3 percent net average 

reduction in vehicle thefts for the Jeep 

Grand Cherokee vehicle line. The 

average theft rate for the Jeep Grand 

Cherokee vehicle for four model years 

prior to installation of an immobilizer 

device as standard equipment (1995– 

1998) was 5.3574, which is significantly 

higher than the 1990/1991 median theft 

rate of 3.5826. However, the average 

theft rate for the six model years after 

installation of the standard immobilizer 

device (1999–2005) was 2.5492, which 

is significantly lower than the median. 

The Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicle line 

was granted an exemption from the 

parts-marking requirements beginning 

with MY 2004. Chrysler stated that it 

expects Fiat 500 vehicles equipped with 

standard ignition immobilizer systems 

to mirror the results achieved by the 

Jeep Cherokee vehicles when ignition 

immobilizer devices were included as 

standard equipment. 

Based on the supporting evidence 

submitted by Chrysler on the Jeep Grand 

Cherokee, the agency believes that the 

antitheft device for the Fiat 500 vehicle 

line is likely to be as effective in 

reducing and deterring motor vehicle 

theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft 

Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). The 

agency concludes that the device will 

provide four of the five types of 

performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3): 

Promoting activation; preventing defeat 

or circumvention of the device by 

unauthorized persons; preventing 

operation of the vehicle by 

unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the 

reliability and durability of the device. 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 

CFR 543.7 (b), the agency grants a 

petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either 

in whole or in part, if it determines that, 

based upon supporting evidence, the 

standard equipment antitheft device is 

likely to be as effective in reducing and 

deterring motor vehicle theft as 

compliance with the parts-marking 

requirements of Part 541. The agency 

finds that Chrysler has provided 

adequate reasons for its belief that the 

antitheft device for the Fiat 500 vehicle 

line is likely to be as effective in 

reducing and deterring motor vehicle 

theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft 

Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541). 

This conclusion is based on the 

information Chrysler provided about its 

device. 

For the foregoing reasons, the agency 

hereby grants in full Chrysler’s petition 

for an exemption for the MY 2012 Fiat 

500 vehicle line from the parts-marking 

requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The 

agency notes that 49 CFR Part 541, 

Appendix A–1, identifies those lines 

that are exempted from the Theft 

Prevention Standard for a given model 

year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains 

publication requirements with respect 

to the disposition of all Part 543 

petitions. Advanced listing, including 

the release of future product 

nameplates, the beginning model year 

for which the petition is granted and a 

general description of the antitheft 

device is necessary in order to notify 

law enforcement agencies of new 

vehicle lines exempted from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft 

Prevention Standard. 

If Chrysler decides not to use the 

exemption for this vehicle line, it must 

formally notify the agency. If such a 

decision is made, the vehicle line must 

be fully marked as required by 49 CFR 

Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major 

component parts and replacement 

parts). 

NHTSA notes that if Chrysler wishes 

in the future to modify the device on 

which this exemption is based, the 

company may have to submit a petition 

to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) 

states that a Part 543 exemption applies 

only to vehicles that belong to a line 

exempted under this part and equipped 

with the anti-theft device on which the 

line’s exemption is based. Further, 

§ 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission 

of petitions to modify an exemption to 

permit the use of an antitheft device 

similar to but differing from the one 

specified in that exemption. 

The agency wishes to minimize the 

administrative burden that Part 

543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted 

vehicle manufacturers and itself. The 

agency did not intend Part 543 to 

require the submission of a modification 

petition for every change to the 

components or design of an antitheft 

device. The significance of many such 

changes could be de minimis. Therefore, 

NHTSA suggests that if the 

manufacturer contemplates making any 

changes the effects of which might be 

characterized as de minimis, it should 

consult the agency before preparing and 

submitting a petition to modify. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of 

authority at 49 CFR 1.50. 

Issued on: August 26, 2010. 

Joseph S. Carra, 

Acting Associate Administrator for 

Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21758 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

August 25, 2010. 

The Department of the Treasury will 

submit the following public information 

collection requirement(s) to OMB for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 on or after the date 

of publication of this notice. Copies of 

the submission(s) may be obtained by 

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 

Officer listed. Comments regarding this 

information collection should be 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices 53377 

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed 

and to the Treasury Department 

Clearance Officer, Department of the 

Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20220. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before September 30, 

2010 to be assured of consideration. 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau (TTB) 

OMB Number: 1513–0005. 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of a currently approved 

collection. 

Title: Letterhead applications and 

notices filed by brewers TTB REC 5130/ 

2. 

Form: TTB F 5130.10. 

Abstract: The Internal Revenue Code 

requires brewers to file a notice of intent 

to operate a brewery. TTB F 5130.10 is 

similar to a permit and, when approved 

by TTB, is a brewer’s authorization to 

operate. Letterhead applications and 

notices are necessary to identify 

brewery activities so that TTB may 

ensure that proposed operations do not 

jeopardize Federal revenues. 

Respondents: Private Sector: 

Businesses or other for-profits. 

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 10,593 

hours. 

Clearance Officer: Gerald Isenberg, 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20005; (202) 453– 

2097 

OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, 

Office of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395–7873. 

Celina M. Elphage, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21669 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Designation of One Individual 

Pursuant to Executive Order 13224 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

(‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the names of one 

newly-designated individual whose 

property and interests in property are 

blocked pursuant to Executive Order 

13224 of September 23, 2001, ‘‘Blocking 

Property and Prohibiting Transactions 

With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To 

Commit, or Support Terrorism.’’ 

DATES: The designation by the Director 

of OFAC of the individual identified in 

this notice, pursuant to Executive Order 

13224, is effective on August 24, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Assistant Director, Compliance 

Outreach & Implementation, Office of 

Foreign Assets Control, Department of 

the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220, 

tel.: 202/622–2490. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic and Facsimile Availability 

This document and additional 

information concerning OFAC are 

available from OFAC’s Web site (http:// 

www.treas.gov/ofac) or via facsimile 

through a 24-hour fax-on-demand 

service, tel.: 202/622–0077. 

Background 

On September 23, 2001, the President 

issued Executive Order 13224 (the 

‘‘Order’’) pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 

U.S.C. 1701–1706, and the United 

Nations Participation Act of 1945, 22 

U.S.C. 287c. In the Order, the President 

declared a national emergency to 

address grave acts of terrorism and 

threats of terrorism committed by 

foreign terrorists, including the 

September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in 

New York, Pennsylvania, and at the 

Pentagon. The Order imposes economic 

sanctions on persons who have 

committed, pose a significant risk of 

committing, or support acts of terrorism. 

The President identified in the Annex to 

the Order, as amended by Executive 

Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, 13 

individuals and 16 entities as subject to 

the economic sanctions. The Order was 

further amended by Executive Order 

13284 of January 23, 2003, to reflect the 

creation of the Department of Homeland 

Security. 

Section 1 of the Order blocks, with 

certain exceptions, all property and 

interests in property that are in or 

hereafter come within the United States 

or the possession or control of United 

States persons, of: (1) Foreign persons 

listed in the Annex to the Order; (2) 

foreign persons determined by the 

Secretary of State, in consultation with 

the Secretary of the Treasury, the 

Secretary of the Department of 

Homeland Security and the Attorney 

General, to have committed, or to pose 

a significant risk of committing, acts of 

terrorism that threaten the security of 

U.S. nationals or the national security, 

foreign policy, or economy of the United 

States; (3) persons determined by the 

Director of OFAC, in consultation with 

the Departments of State, Homeland 

Security and Justice, to be owned or 

controlled by, or to act for or on behalf 

of those persons listed in the Annex to 

the Order or those persons determined 

to be subject to subsection 1(b), 1(c), or 

1(d)(i) of the Order; and (4) except as 

provided in section 5 of the Order and 

after such consultation, if any, with 

foreign authorities as the Secretary of 

State, in consultation with the Secretary 

of the Treasury, the Secretary of the 

Department of Homeland Security and 

the Attorney General, deems 

appropriate in the exercise of his 

discretion, persons determined by the 

Director of OFAC, in consultation with 

the Departments of State, Homeland 

Security and Justice, to assist in, 

sponsor, or provide financial, material, 

or technological support for, or financial 

or other services to or in support of, 

such acts of terrorism or those persons 

listed in the Annex to the Order or 

determined to be subject to the Order or 

to be otherwise associated with those 

persons listed in the Annex to the Order 

or those persons determined to be 

subject to subsection 1(b), 1(c), or 1(d)(i) 

of the Order. 

On August 24, 2010 the Director of 

OFAC, in consultation with the 

Departments of State, Homeland 

Security, Justice and other relevant 

agencies, designated, pursuant to one or 

more of the criteria set forth in 

subsections 1(b), 1(c) or 1(d) of the 

Order, one individual whose property 

and interests in property are blocked 

pursuant to Executive Order 13224. 

The designee is as follows: 

1. ABU–AL–KHAYR, Muhammad 

Abdallah Hasan (a.k.a. ABU–AL– 

KHAYR, Muhammad Bin-’Abdullah 

Bin-Hamd; a.k.a. ABUL–KHAIR, 

Mohammed Abdullah Hassan; a.k.a. 

AL–HALABI, Abdallah; a.k.a. AL– 

HALABI, Abdullah; a.k.a. AL–HALABI, 

Abu ’Abdallah; a.k.a. AL–JADDAWI, 

Muhannad; a.k.a. AL–MADANI, 

’Abdallah al-Halabi; a.k.a. AL– 

MADANI, Abu Abdallah; a.k.a. AL– 

MAKKI, Abdallah; a.k.a. EL HALABI, 

Abdallah); DOB 19 Jun 1975; alt. DOB 

18 Jun 1975; POB Al-Madinah alMunawwarah, (Medina) Saudi Arabia; 

National ID No. 1006010555 (Saudi 

Arabia); Passport A741097 (Saudi 

Arabia) issued 14 Nov 1995 expires 19 

Sep 2000 (individual) [SDGT]. 

Dated: August 24, 2010. 

Barbara C. Hammerle, 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21670 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES