# Patent

## Title
Offloading the processing of a network protocol stack

## Abstract

A computer system is partitioned during a pre-boot phase of the computer system between a first partition and a second partition, wherein the first partition to include a first processing unit and the second partition to include a second processing unit. An Input/Output (I/O) operating system is booted on the first partition. A general purpose operating system is booted on the second partition. Network transactions are issued by the general purpose operating system to be performed by the I/O operating system. The network transactions are performed by the I/O operating system.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/253,637, filed Oct. 5, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,862,862, which is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,362, filed Aug. 27, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,046,576, which is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/173,069, filed Jun. 30, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,441,112. Each of these prior U.S. Patent Applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


BACKGROUND
1. Field
Embodiments of the invention relate to the field of computer systems and more specifically, but not exclusively, to offloading the processing of a network protocol stack.
2. Background Information
In typical computer architecture, the initialization and configuration of the computer system by firmware, such as the system Basic Input/Output System (BIOS), is commonly referred to as the pre-boot phase. The pre-boot phase is generally defined as the time between a processor reset and loading of an Operating System (OS). At the start of pre-boot, it is up to the code in the firmware to initialize the platform to the point that an operating system may be loaded off of media, such as a hard disk.
The start of the OS load begins the period commonly referred to as OS runtime. During OS runtime, the firmware may act as an interface between software and hardware components of a computer system as well as handle system-related tasks. As computer systems have become more sophisticated, the operational environment between the OS level and the hardware level is generally referred to as the system firmware.
The processing of a network protocol stack, such as a TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) stack, may consume much of the processing power of a Central Processing Unit (CPU). The processing of the network protocol stack by the CPU reduces the processing speed of other applications by the CPU. This situation can be exasperated in a server system that may have to process numerous network transactions concurrently.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2A is a diagram illustrating a multi-processor system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2B is a block diagram illustrating a multi-core processor in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a network protocol stack in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the logic and operations to initialize a system during pre-boot in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the logic and operations to initialize a system during pre-boot in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the logic and operations to initialize a system during pre-boot in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the logic and operations to process an I/O request during OS runtime
FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating the logic and operations to process an I/O request during OS runtime.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that embodiments of the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring understanding of this description.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
In the following description and claims, the term “coupled” and its derivatives may be used. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct contact (physically, electrically, magnetically, optically, etc.). “Coupled” may also mean two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but still cooperate or interact with each other.
Referring to FIG. 1, an architecture of a computer system 100 in accordance with embodiments of the invention is shown. It will be appreciated that embodiments of the invention are not limited to the architecture as shown in FIG. 1. Further details regarding computer system 100 are discussed at the end of this specification.
Computer system 100 includes processing units 101,102,103 and 104. Processing units 101-104 are coupled by links. For example, processing unit 101 is coupled to processing unit 104 by link 170. Links are shown in FIG. 1 by a heavy dotted-line.
The links provide a point-to-point interconnection between two endpoints, also referred to as nodes. In one embodiment, a link includes two uni-directional physical connections that transmit information serially. In another embodiment, commands and/or data are transported across a link in the form of packets. Embodiments of a link architecture include, but are not limited to, a HyperTransportTM Technology as promulgated by the HyperTransport Consortium and a Common System Interface (CSI) as promulgated by the Intel® Corporation. Embodiments of link architecture will be discussed further below.
In one embodiment, each processing unit 101-104 is coupled to a corresponding memory 105-108, respectively. In one embodiment, each memory 105-108 is coupled to processing units 101-104, respectively, by a link. In one embodiment, each processing unit 101-104 includes a memory controller.
In one embodiment, each processing unit 101-104 has access to the memory 105-108 of all the other processing units. In this particular embodiment, memory is presented to an operating system as a single virtual block. However, this single virtual block may map to various physical memory 105-108.
Memory 107 is divided into an I/O OS memory 107A and a shared memory 107B. As will be described in further detail below, shared memory 107B is shared by processing units 101-104 for conducting network transactions. Shared memory 107B may serve as a “mailbox” for passing commands and data between a General Purpose (GP) OS and an Input/Output (I/O) OS. I/O OS memory 107A is hidden from the General Purpose OS and is sequestered for use only by processing unit 104 or other processing units partitioned for network protocol stack processing. Similarly, memory 105, 106 and 108 are partitioned for use by the GP OS.
In an alternative embodiment, a hardware storage 150, such as buffers or registers, may serve as the “mailbox” between partitions instead of shared system memory. The GP OS and I/O OS may make read and write calls to the hardware storage for passing network activity, where the hardware storage is mapped as memory mapped I/O. In one embodiment, this hardware storage is part of a chipset that is mounted to a board, where the board includes sockets for the processing units and system memory.
In one embodiment, this hardware storage may be referred to as a hardware FIFO (First-In First-Out). In one embodiment, the chipset may include hardware FIFOs where each one may store up to several hundreds of bytes. Thus, a single Ethernet frame (maximum of approximately 1500 bytes) may be passed using hardware FIFOs. In another embodiment, hardware FIFOs may be interrupt driven such that an interrupt is issued to a processing unit when data is available to be read in the hardware FIFO or there is space in the FIFO to post or send data. As such, the GP OS and I/O OS may be able to act in a high-performance, reactive fashion.
Processing units 101 and 102 are coupled to an Input/Output Hub (IOH) 110 by links, and processing units 103 and 104 are each coupled to an IOH 112 by links. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, IOH 110 serves as the master IOH.
Various devices may be coupled to IOH 110 and 112. In computer system 100, a non-volatile storage (NVS) 114, such as Flash memory, may be coupled to IOH 110. NVS 114 may have stored system firmware 116.
Embodiments of the system firmware 116 described herein may be implemented substantially in compliance with the Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) (Extensible Firmware Interface Specification, Version 1.10, Dec. 1, 2002, available at http://developer.intel.com/technology/efi.) EFI enables firmware, in the form of firmware modules, such as drivers, to be loaded from a variety of different resources, including flash memory devices, option ROMs (Read-Only Memory), other storage devices, such as hard disks, CD-ROM (Compact Disk-Read Only Memory), or from one or more computer systems over a computer network. One embodiment of an implementation of the EFI specification is described in the Intel® Platform Innovation Framework for EFI Architecture Specification—Draft for Review, Version 0.9, Sep. 16, 2003,” (available at www.intel.com/technology/framework). It will be understood that embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the “Framework” or implementations in compliance with the EFI specification.
A storage device 118, such as a hard disk drive, is also coupled to IOH 110 and has stored instructions for a General Purpose operating system 120 and an I/O operating system 122. As shown in FIG. 1, processing units 101-103 are designated to execute General Purpose OS 120 in one partition and processing unit 104 is designated to execute I/O OS 122 in another partition. Embodiments of general purpose OS 120 include Microsoft® Windows, Unix, Linux, Apple® Mac OS, or the like. Embodiments of I/O OS 122 may include a “lightweight” OS to support I/O tasking. Embodiments of I/O OS 122 may include a real-time operating system (RTOS), such as VxWorks. In other embodiments, I/O OS 122 may include a Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) Unix OS, or the like.
IOH 112 is coupled to Universal Serial Bus (USB) ports 124 and one or more network interfaces 126. Network interfaces 126 may send and receive communications over network 128.
Embodiments of the invention provide for designating a processing unit of a system to handle network protocol processing of a system. In one embodiment, the system is partitioned so that one or more processing units support General Purpose OS 120 and one or more processing units support I/O OS 122. While embodiments herein are discussed in conjunction with a system having four processing units, it will be appreciated that embodiments herein may be used on a system having greater or fewer than four processing units. In one embodiment, a processing unit may support multi-threading.
As shown in FIG. 2A, embodiments of the invention may be implemented on a multi-processor system 200, where a processing unit includes a processor. In one embodiment, multi-processor system 200 is a Symmetric Multiprocessor system wherein one copy of a particular OS resides in memory, but any processor may run the OS. In another embodiment, system 200 includes a server deployed to handle high amounts of network traffic.
As shown in FIG. 2B, embodiments of the invention may be implemented on a multi-core processor 250, where a processing unit includes a processor core. Embodiments of multi-core processor 250 include a processor having symmetric cores or asymmetric cores.
Turning to FIG. 3, an embodiment an I/O OS 310 processing a network protocol stack is shown. In FIG. 3, a conventional system design is shown at 302 and an embodiment of the present invention is shown at 304. In FIG. 3, the network protocol stack is a TCP/IP stack. However, it will be appreciated that embodiments of the invention may be implemented with other network protocol stacks such as Novell Netware, AppleTalk, or the like.
In conventional design 302, an application 306, such as an Internet browser, is layered on General Purpose OS 308 which is layered on hardware 312. Hardware 312 includes a Network Interface Card (NIC) 320 for connecting the system to network 128. The TCP/IP stack includes a TCP layer 313, an IP layer 314, a Media Access Control (MAC) layer 315, and a Physical (PHY) layer 316.
In conventional design 302, the TCP and IP layers are processed by General Purpose OS 308 and the MAC and PHY layers are handled by NIC 320. In a system handling a lot of network traffic, processing network protocol stack tasking wastes processing resources. As a general rule in industry, in an Ethernet connection, for every one bit per second (bps) of network data processed, one hertz of processing is needed.
An embodiment of the invention, shown at 304, processing of the network protocol stack is moved out of General Purpose OS 308 and to I/O OS 310. As shown, the TCP and IP layers are processed by I/O OS 310 which interacts with NIC 320 for handling network transactions. In another embodiment, I/O OS 310 works in conjunction with an application supported by I/O OS 310 for processing the network protocol stack. Thus, General Purpose OS 308 is freed to handle other activity. In one embodiment, I/O OS 310 processes all phases of the network protocol stack including opening and closing sockets, connection management, and error handling.
In one embodiment, an OS device driver of General Purpose OS 308 may post a network transaction to shared memory 107B. In one embodiment, this is similar to the operation of memory mapped I/O. I/O OS 310 completes the network transaction and signals General Purpose OS 308 when the transaction is completed. General Purpose OS 308 may then retrieve the completed network transaction from a designated memory address in shared memory 107B.
In one embodiment, the General Purpose OS 308 is unaware of the partition handling the network protocol stack. From the perspective of the GP OS, it is interacting with a hardware device via the OS device driver. As discussed further below, the General Purpose OS only has knowledge of the system resources as passed to the GP OS by the firmware.
Network transactions include activity between a system and a network. Network transactions may involve one-way or two-way communications. Network transactions support such user functions as email, Internet browsing, and uploading/downloading files.
Embodiments of the present invention enhance network protocol stack processing without the expense of a specialized TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE). A TOE offloads the processing of the TCP/IP protocol stack from a main processor to specialized hardware. The TOE may be embodied in a NIC, a Host Bus Adapter, or other I/O card. TOE's may be implemented as a network processor executing instructions or an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC).
TOE's usually only work for large, sequential block transfers, so it is hard for customers to amortize thousands of dollars per TOE card for random, small network transactions. With embodiments described herein, TOE behavior may be called upon from a spare processing unit. However, if extra protocol stack processing power is not needed, then the I/O processing units may be reconfigured for General Purpose OS use.
Also, specialized I/O cards, such as TOE cards, take up a slot on the I/O bus, wherein embodiments herein do not. Further, the I/O bus connection to the slot may form a bottleneck for activity between the I/O card and memory. Embodiments of the invention put the I/O processing unit(s) within a high-speed interconnect topology with memory and other processing units supporting the General Purpose OS.
Turning to FIG. 4, a flowchart 400 to initialize a system during pre-boot in accordance with embodiments herein is shown. In one embodiment, at least a portion of the logic of flowchart 400 is implemented by I/O OS 122 executing on at least one processing unit of computer system 100.
Starting in a block 402, the system is reset. The system reset marks the beginning of the pre-boot phase. In one embodiment, at least a portion of the instructions of system firmware 116 are loaded from NVS storage 114 and executed. In one embodiment, at least one processing unit is designated as the pre-boot processor.
Proceeding to a block 404, the system is initialized. System initialization may include a Power-On Self Test (POST). During system initialization, system firmware 116 may interrogate the system to discover what hardware is present and the hardware capabilities.
Continuing to a decision block 406, the logic determines if any processing units are designated as an I/O processing unit. In one embodiment, the designating of which processing units are to be I/O processing units is coded into the system firmware 116. Since this is part of system firmware 116, the division of processing units between the GP OS and the I/O OS may be changed by revising the system firmware. If the answer to decision block 406 is no, then the logic continues to a block 416 to boot the General Purpose OS on the non-I/O processing units.
If the answer to decision block 406 is yes, then the logic proceeds to a block 408 to partition the system. Partitioning separates the system into different portions that may act as individual systems. As will be described, each partition has its own OS, processing units, memory resources, and link topology. A common memory mapping, such as shared memory 107B, will serve to pass network transactions between the partitions.
In one embodiment, the system is partitioned according to a soft partition 410. In soft partition 410, the amount of system resources are under-reported to the General Purpose OS by system firmware 116. For example, the number of processing units and amount of memory is under-reported. The non-reported resources are reserved for use by the I/O OS. In soft partitioning, system firmware 116 “fools” the General Purpose OS as to the actual configuration of the system. In soft partitioning, the partitions are separated as viewed by the respective operating systems, but are not necessarily separated at the hardware level.
In another embodiment, the system is partitioned according to a hard partition 412. In hard partition 412, system resources are configured such that some of the system resources are inaccessible to the General Purpose OS and the I/O OS. In hard partitioning, processing units and memory is partitioned at the hardware level, such as by the setting of registers, such that the partitions are physically separated.
After block 408, the logic proceeds to a block 414 to boot the I/O OS on the processing unit(s) designated for I/O processing. The logic then continues to block 416 to boot the General Purpose OS on the non-I/O processing units.
Turning to FIG. 5, an embodiment of a soft partitioning scheme 500 is shown. Starting in a block 502, the processing units designated for the I/O OS are omitted from system configuration tables that are referenced by the General Purpose OS and the I/O OS. In one embodiment, system firmware 116 constructs such configuration tables during pre-boot.
In one embodiment, a multiprocessor system, such as shown in FIG. 2A, is in compliance with the Multiprocessor Specification, Intel® Corporation, version 1.4, May 1997 (hereafter referred to as the “MPS”). The MPS delineates an MP Configuration Table 510 that is used by the General Purpose OS and the I/O OS. During the pre-boot phase, system firmware 116 fills in entries in Table 510 after discovering the system configuration. MP Configuration Table 510 includes entries regarding system processors, buses, Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controllers (APICs), and Interrupts.
In accordance with embodiments herein, the system firmware 116 may construct an MP Configuration Table for use by the General Purpose OS. This MP Configuration Table reports the processors designated for use by the General Purpose OS. Similarly, system firmware 116 reports different processing units for use by the I/O OS. Since system firmware 116 reports the memory location to the respective OS's for the MP Configuration Table, the system firmware 116 may report locations of the MP Configuration Table to the General Purpose OS and I/O OS, accordingly.
In another embodiment of soft partitioning, system firmware 116 constructs Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) tables in accordance with the Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification, revision 2.0b, Oct. 11, 2002. FIG. 5 shows ACPI System Description Tables 512. These tables list devices of the system, such as processing units, and their power management capabilities. Tables 512 enable an OS to control devices without having to know how the controls are implemented. Tables 512 also indicate system power states supported by the system, a description of system power planes, clock capabilities, and battery resources. For example, the ACPI Multiple APIC Description Table (MADT) may be set so that only certain processing units are marked present as referenced by the General Purpose OS. The remaining processing units are marked present as referenced by the I/O OS.
At least a portion of Tables 512 are setup in memory by system firmware 116 during pre-boot. The General Purpose OS and I/O OS refer to the ACPI tables during OS boot and OS runtime. Since system firmware 116 constructs the ACPI System Description Tables 512, system firmware 116 reports system resources, such as processing units, to the General Purpose and I/O OS's.
In a block 504, system firmware 116 partitions system memory 519 between GP OS memory 520 and I/O OS memory 524. An overlapping shared portion is designated shared memory 522. The GP OS and I/O OS are also made aware that shared memory 522 is not for general use, but is reserved for network transactions. In one embodiment, the GP OS may “see” the shared memory 522 as memory mapped I/O for a network interface.
System firmware 116 may under-report the total amount of memory to the General Purpose OS excluding the memory allocated as only for the I/O OS memory. Similarly, system firmware 116 may under-report the total amount of memory to the I/O OS excluding memory allocated as only for the General Purpose OS. The General Purpose OS and the I/O OS construct their memory pages according to the amount of memory reported by system firmware 116. In various embodiments, system firmware 116 may report the amount of available memory by the Intl 5h E820 system call for conventional BIOS or the GetMemoryMap( ) call for an EFI compliant system.
Referring to FIG. 6, an embodiment of a hard partitioning scheme 600 is shown. In a block 602, the links between processing units are configured during pre-boot. At startup, system firmware 116 may interrogate all the links, establish link widths (e.g., 2 bits, 4 bits, etc.), and link frequencies. Link configuration information may be stored in system registers. In the HyperTransport Technology, these registers are referred to as the Link Configuration registers and the Link Frequency registers (see, HyperTransport I/O Link Specification, HyperTransport Technology Consortium, revision 1.10, Aug. 25, 2003).
Also, each end of a link may be referred to as a node and have an associated node identification (node id), such as node id 101A corresponding to processing unit (i.e., node) 101.
Also, in FIG. 6, link 606 between processing units 101 and 102, and link 608 between processing units 102 and 104 are not reported by system firmware 116 to the General Purpose OS 120 and I/O OS 122. Thus, packets may not be transferred between processing unit 101 and processing unit 102 along link 606. Even though link 606 may be physically present, system firmware 116 sets system registers accordingly so that link 606 is not functional.
Proceeding to a block 604, the route tables for the links in each partition are configured. Route tables may also be referred to as “address decoders.” When a packet is received at a node, the node refers to a route table, such as route table 610. The node uses the route table to determine the next node to forward the packet to in order for the packet to reach its destination node. Route tables may be constructed for each partition to describe the routing within each partition. In one embodiment, the General Purpose OS and I/O OS do not have to be aware of the link topology and routing in their respective partitions because this is handled at the firmware and/or hardware level.
Referring again to link 606, the route tables at the nodes would not include information for sending packets between processing units 101 and 102 since link 606 has been hard partitioned out of the system.
Also, the route tables may be constructed such that I/O OS memory 107A is not accessible to the General Purpose OS, but shared memory 107B is accessible to the General Purpose OS for conveying network transactions to the I/O OS. Route tables in each partition and the associated routing logic comprehend this partitioning of memory 107.
In some situations, hard partitioning may be more reliable than soft partitioning. For example, in soft partitioning, even though memory 107 is partitioned, a memory overrun of shared memory 107B could overwrite data in I/O OS memory 107A since memory 107A and 107B are only partitioned because the firmware under-reported available memory to the General Purpose OS.
In contrast, in a hard partitioning, a memory overrun may be avoided because I/O OS memory 107A is inaccessible by the General Purpose OS due to hard partitioning. In one embodiment using route tables, access to I/O OS memory by the General Purpose is prohibited because of a lack of routing information to reach the memory of the I/O OS by the GP OS.
It will be appreciated that a partitioning scheme (hard or soft) may be programmed into the system firmware by a system vendor. The system vendor may receive “generic” system boards having multiple processing units. The system vendor may then affect embodiments herein by programming the system firmware as desired.
Also, in accordance with embodiments herein, the General Purpose OS has no knowledge of the partitioning of the system by the firmware. Thus, a General Purpose OS does not have to be modified when used with embodiments herein. A system vendor may load the same General Purpose OS on systems that utilize the offloading of network protocol processing or that do not. Also, the General Purpose OS does not have to be modified to work with different embodiments of the partitioning as described herein.
Further, a customer may change their partitioning setup by revising the system firmware. For example, if a server board is re-deployed to a place in an enterprise network where more processing units are to be sequestered for network protocol stack processing, then system firmware may be revised accordingly. Alternatively, the firmware may be updated to remove the partitioning of a processing unit for network protocol stack processing. Further, the General Purpose OS does not have to be modified to support a firmware revision of the partitioning. Thus, embodiments herein provide a system with a flexible reconfiguration capability.
Turning to FIG. 7, a flowchart 700 for processing a network protocol stack during OS runtime in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown. In one embodiment, at least a portion of the logic of flowchart 700 is conducted by I/O OS 122 executing on one or more processing units of computer system 100.
Starting in a decision block 702, the logic determines if a network transaction has been received from the General Purpose OS. If the answer is no, the I/O OS continues waiting. If the answer is yes, then the logic proceeds to a block 704 to retrieve the network transaction from shared memory. The network transaction may be a non-blocking request such that General Purpose OS and its associated processing units may continue with other activity while the I/O OS completes the network transaction.
For example, an application, such as an email application or an Internet browser, running on the General Purpose OS may issue a network transaction. Referring to FIG. 8, a network transaction 802 has been issued at General Purpose OS 120. Network transaction 802 is posted to a memory address ‘X’ in shared memory 107B that is monitored by I/O OS 122. Memory address ‘X’ may serve as a mailbox between General Purpose OS 120 and I/O OS 122. Network transaction 802 may include a payload 806. Payload 806 may include commands and/or data.
Returning to flowchart 700, the logic proceeds to a decision block 706 where the logic determines if an adjustment to I/O OS resources is needed. In one embodiment, the logic determines if processing units designated for the I/O OS are to be brought up or put into a sleep state. In one embodiment, the I/O OS may reference a threshold number of network transactions that are queued for processing in determining if additional processing units are needed. Putting unneeded processing units into a sleep state saves power consumed by computer system 100 as well as reducing the cooling needs of computer system 100.
If the answer to decision block 706 is yes, then the logic proceeds to a block 708 to enable or disable one or more processing units. In one embodiment, management of I/O processing units is conducted by the I/O OS or agent running on the I/O OS. After block 708, then logic continues to a block 710 to perform the network transaction.
If the answer to decision block 706 is no, then the logic proceeds to block 710 to perform the network transaction. As shown in FIG. 8, I/O OS 122 manages interaction with network 128 to perform network transaction 802. I/O OS 122 manages the network protocol stack for the system. If appropriate for network transaction 802, a completed network transaction 812 may be placed in shared memory 107B at address ‘Y’. Completed network transaction 812 may include a payload 814.
Returning to FIG. 7, after block 710, the logic proceeds to a block 712 to signal to the General Purpose OS 120 that the network transaction is completed. After block 712, the logic continues to decision block 702. In FIG. 8, processing unit 104 issues an InterProcessor Interrupt (IPI) to processing unit 103 to indicate network transaction 802 has been completed. In an alternative embodiment, General Purpose OS 120 may periodically poll I/O OS 122 asking if network transaction 802 has been completed. When the General Purpose OS receives the completion signal, the General Purpose OS may “pickup” the completed network transaction 812 at memory address ‘Y’ of shared memory 107B.
Further embodiments of computer system 100 in FIG. 1 will now be discussed. Processing units 101-104 may include, but are not limited to, an Intel® Corporation Pentium®, Xeon®, or Itanium® family processor, or the like. Memory 105-108 may include, but is not limited to, Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Synchronized Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Rambus Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM), or the like. In one embodiment, memory 105-108 may include one or more memory units that do not have to be refreshed.
Computer system 100 may include a memory controller, such as a Memory Controller Hub (MCH), an input/output controller, such as an Input/Output Controller Hub (ICH). In one embodiment, one or more memory controllers for memory 105-108 may reside in the same chip(s) as processing units 101-104. Computer system 100 may also include system clock support, power management support, audio support, graphics support, or the like. Computer system 100 may include an I/O device such as a keyboard, a mouse, a display, a printer, a scanner, or the like.
Components of computer system 100 may be connected by various interconnects. In one embodiment, an interconnect may be point-to-point between two components, while in other embodiments, an interconnect may connect more than two components. Such interconnects may include a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), such as PCI Express, a System Management bus (SMBUS), a Low Pin Count (LPC) bus, a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus, an Accelerated Graphics Port (AGP) interface, or the like.
Computer system 100 may interface to external systems through network interface(s) 126. Network interface(s) 126 may include, but is not limited to, a modem, a Network Interface Card (NIC), or other interfaces for coupling a computer system to other computer systems. A carrier wave signal may be received/transmitted by network interface(s) 126. In one embodiment, the carrier wave signal may used to interface computer system 100 with network 128. Network 128 may include a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), the Internet, or any combination thereof. In one embodiment, network 128 is further coupled to another computer system (not shown) such that computer system 100 may communicate with this other computer system over network 128.
Computer system 100 also includes non-volatile storage 114 on which firmware and/or data may be stored. Non-volatile storage devices include, but are not limited to, Read-Only Memory (ROM), Flash memory, Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM), Electronically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), Non-Volatile Random Access Memory (NVRAM), or the like.
Storage 118 includes, but is not limited to, a magnetic disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, or the like. It is appreciated that instructions executable by processing units 101-104 may reside in storage 118, memory 105-108, non-volatile storage 114, or may be transmitted or received via network interface(s) 126.
Embodiments of General Purpose OS 120 include the Microsoft Windows® family of operating systems. Other operating systems that may also be used with computer system 100 include, but are not limited to, the Apple Macintosh operating system, the Linux operating system, the Unix operating system, or the like.
For the purposes of the specification, a machine-accessible medium includes any mechanism that provides (i.e., stores and/or transmits) information in a form readable or accessible by a machine (e.g., a computer, network device, personal digital assistant, manufacturing tool, any device with a set of one or more processors, etc.). For example, a machine-accessible medium includes, but is not limited to, recordable/non-recordable media (e.g., Read-Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, a flash memory device, etc.). In addition, a machine-accessible medium may include propagated signals such as electrical, optical, acoustical or other forms of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.).
Various operations of embodiments of the present invention are described herein. These operations may be implemented by a machine using a processor, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or the like. In one embodiment, one or more of the operations described may constitute instructions stored on a machine-accessible medium, that when executed by a machine will cause the machine to perform the operations described. The order in which some or all of the operations are described should not be construed as to imply that these operations are necessarily order dependent. Alternative ordering will be appreciated by one skilled in the art having the benefit of this description. Further, it will be understood that not all operations are necessarily present in each embodiment of the invention.
The above description of illustrated embodiments of the invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. These modifications can be made to embodiments of the invention in light of the above detailed description. The terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification. Rather, the following claims are to be construed in accordance with established doctrines of claim interpretation.

## Claims

1. An apparatus comprising:
means for receiving and handling an input/output (I/O) request of a Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system to be executed by a multi-core processor of a computer, the Microsoft Windows operating system being different from a first operating system with which the means for receiving and handling is associated;
means for reporting a number of processing units of the computer to the Microsoft Windows operating system as being available that is different from a total actual number of processing units of the computer, each processing unit of the computer comprising a processor core, the number of the processing units of the computer to be reported to the Microsoft Windows operating system being user changeable;
the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system, wherein a portion of memory allocated to the first operating system is hidden from the Microsoft Windows operating system.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with network transaction processing.

3. An apparatus comprising:
means for receiving and handling an input/output (I/O) request of a Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system to be executed by a multi-core processor of a computer, the Microsoft Windows operating system being different from a first operating system with which the means is associated;
means for allocating an amount of memory of the computer and a number of processing units of the computer, in respective allocations, to the Microsoft Windows operating system that are different from a total actual amount of memory of the computer and a total actual number of processing units of the computer, the respective allocations being user changeable, wherein a portion of memory allocated to the first operating system is hidden from the Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
and also wherein:
the amount of memory of the computer and the number of processing units of the computer to be different from a reported amount of memory of the computer and a reported number of processing units of the computer, as reported to the Microsoft Windows operating system.

4. Non-transitory machine-accessible memory storing instructions that when executed by a machine result in performance of operations comprising:
executing by a multi-core processor of a computer an agent associated with a first operating system, the agent to handle an input/output (I/O) request of a second operating system in such a way as to enhance I/O performance of the second operating system;
the second operating system being a Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system and the second operating system to be executed by the multi-core processor;
the computer comprising memory to be partitioned so as to be respectively allocated, in respective partitions, to the first operating system and the second operating system, the respective partitions being user reconfigurable, the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system; and
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
wherein the first operating system is capable of interacting with network interface hardware of the computer to handle, at least in part, processing of a network transaction associated with the Microsoft Windows operating system, the processing of the network transaction to be carried out in such a way that, from the perspective of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system is to interact with a hardware device to process the network transaction.

5. The machine-accessible memory of claim 4, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with processing of the network transaction.

6. The machine-accessible memory of claim 4, wherein:
the processing comprises transmission control protocol (TCP)/internet protocol (IP) processing.

7. An apparatus comprising:
a multi-core processor of a computer to execute an agent associated with a first operating system, the agent to handle an input/output (I/O) request of a second operating system in such a way as to enhance I/O performance of the second operating system;
the second operating system being a Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system and the second operating system to be executed by the multi-core processor;
the computer comprising memory to be partitioned so as to be respectively allocated, in respective partitions, to the first operating system and the second operating system, the respective partitions being user reconfigurable, the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system; and
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
wherein the first operating system is capable of interacting with network interface hardware of the computer to handle, at least in part, processing of a network transaction associated with the Microsoft Windows operating system, the processing of the network transaction to be carried out in such a way that, from the perspective of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system is to interact with a hardware device to process the network transaction.

8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with processing of the network transaction.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein:
the processing comprises transmission control protocol (TCP)/internet protocol (IP) processing.

10. A method comprising:
executing by a multi-core processor of a computer an agent associated with a first operating system, the agent to handle an input/output (I/O) request of a second operating system in such a way as to enhance I/O performance of the second operating system;
the second operating system being a Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system and the second operating system to be executed by the multi-core processor;
the computer comprising memory to be partitioned so as to be respectively allocated, in respective partitions, to the first operating system and the second operating system, the respective partitions being user reconfigurable, the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system; and
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
wherein the first operating system is capable of interacting with network interface hardware of the computer to handle, at least in part, processing of a network transaction associated with the Microsoft Windows operating system, the processing of the network transaction to be carried out in such a way that, from the perspective of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system is to interact with a hardware device to process the network transaction.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with processing of the network transaction.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein:
the processing comprises transmission control protocol (TCP)/internet protocol (IP) processing.

13. Non-transitory machine-accessible memory storing instructions that when executed by a machine result in performance of operations comprising:
executing, by a multi-core processor of a computer, an agent associated with a first operating system;
the agent to handle an input/output (I/O) request of a Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system to be executed by the processor, the Microsoft Windows operating system being different from the first operating system; and
an amount of memory of the computer and a number of processing units of the computer to be allocated in respective allocations to the Microsoft Windows operating system that are different from a total actual amount of memory of the computer and a total actual number of processing units of the computer, the respective allocations being user changeable, the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
wherein the first operating system is capable of interacting with network interface hardware of the computer to handle, at least in part, processing of a network transaction associated with the Microsoft Windows operating system, the processing of the network transaction to be carried out in such a way that, from the perspective of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system is to interact with a hardware device to process the network transaction.

14. The machine-accessible memory of claim 13, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with network transaction processing.

15. The machine-accessible memory of claim 13, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with transmission control protocol (TCP)/internet protocol (IP) processing.

16. An apparatus comprising:
a multi-core processor of a computer, the processor to execute an agent associated with a first operating system;
the agent to handle an input/output (I/O) request of a Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system to be executed by the processor, the Microsoft Windows operating system being different from the first operating system; and
an amount of memory of the computer and a number of processing units of the computer to be allocated in respective allocations to the Microsoft Windows operating system that are different from a total actual amount of memory of the computer and a total actual number of processing units of the computer, the respective allocations being user changeable, the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
wherein the first operating system is capable of interacting with network interface hardware of the computer to handle, at least in part, processing of a network transaction associated with the Microsoft Windows operating system, the processing of the network transaction to be carried out in such a way that, from the perspective of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system is to interact with a hardware device to process the network transaction.

17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with network transaction processing.

18. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with transmission control protocol (TCP)/internet protocol (IP) processing.

19. A method comprising:
executing, by a multi-core processor of a computer, an agent associated with a first operating system;
the agent to handle an input/output (I/O) request of a Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system to be executed by the processor, the Microsoft Windows operating system being different from the first operating system; and
an amount of memory of the computer and a number of processing units of the computer to be allocated in respective allocations to the Microsoft Windows operating system that are different from a total actual amount of memory of the computer and a total actual number of processing units of the computer, the respective allocations being user changeable, the first operating system to share data of the first operating system with the Microsoft Windows operating system;
the first operating system comprising a Unix operating system;
wherein the first operating system is capable of interacting with network interface hardware of the computer to handle, at least in part, processing of a network transaction associated with the Microsoft Windows operating system, the processing of the network transaction to be carried out in such a way that, from the perspective of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Microsoft Windows operating system is to interact with a hardware device to process the network transaction.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with network transaction processing.

21. The method of claim 19, wherein:
the I/O request is associated with transmission control protocol (TCP)/internet protocol (IP) processing.