alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Reserved;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design of operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely effect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|           |  |                        
|---------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:      |  | March 26, 2004         
|Signature: |  | /s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs  
|           |  | Jeffrey P. Jacobs      
|Title:     |  | Chief Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

‘3 

,mLD c. nmn 

.-•-- J 

Han. Lea Presnel.3. 

COUty Attorney 

Upehur County 

Oilmer, Texaai 

Bar sirs 

of thi8 daptwb 

yea .is aQ-YfcaDwQ: 

pasaengsr ae.sv 

al8 other thsn 8 atotor 

&Mxw Bus* 8hal.X inolude every vehlcle exoept taose operate4 by xutl*ular power 

or exclu.uaively OD otatlonary rails% oz traoke, 

whhiah is used in tm~rt~ pereons bet-en or through tW@ ,a% :*ZO inCOrpaZ%tteQ 
Hon. Leo Prean~ll, 

oities and/or 

peneation (or 

fIxed route6 or osnerwlees exoept euoh or 

soid vehiolee aa are operated exoluslv~ly 

within the limits of inoorpoiated oitles and/ 

or towns or suburban additiona to 8uoh towna." 

. . . 

~Your letter atfr+ that the vehiole lqulr- _ - ed amu'T; le operatea rer hire in the tranaportatlon 

of aohool pupll.8. However, your letter does not give 

us the route of the vehiolo or 5nform ua whether it ~II 

operated between or tbrougb two ok more lnoorporated 

oltlea and or towna and/or villages or operated uslualrely wit 6 In the llmlts of inooriorated oities 

towna or suburban addltione to muah town& under 

wording oithe statute ii the bum $8 operated between 

two or through two or more lnoorporated eitles and/Or 

towna ar villagea then it must ne6ea&lybe 0&@8- 

iSled as a nytor L. 

If the buis i6 aperatod wer ruralroad@ 

and is not operated between or through two or more inoorporated oitles, town8 or rlllage8;thaol it may properly be regietersd an a passenger ear. 

We bsllwethat if youha~ethe~tactts tit 

hand to dotoralne the muto &f the vehiblo, you will 

than be able to dotemd$ne whether it is olaeaifled aa 

a paesengsr ear or as a motor bur* 

Your8 very truly 

APPROVED 

OPINION 

0 

COMMn-rEE 

?&f&F
----

----

|   | Subsidiary                                                                                                                                                                                          | Jurisdiction                  ofIncorporation |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |  Platinum                  Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. ............................(100%                  owned by Platinum Holdings)                  |  Bermuda                                 |
|   | Platinum                  Regency Holdings .......................................(100%                  owned by Platinum Holdings)           | Ireland                                       |
|   | Platinum                  Underwriters Finance, Inc. ..............................(100%                  owned by Platinum Regency Holdings)              | Delaware                                      |
|   | Platinum                  Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc. ........................(100%                  owned by Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc.)          | Maryland                                      |
|   | Platinum                  Administrative Services, Inc. ..........................(100%                  owned by Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc.)         | Delaware                                      |
|   | Platinum                  Re (UK) Limited .........................................(100%                  owned by Platinum Regency Holdings)  | United                  Kingdom               |
|   | Platinum                  UK Services Company Limited ......................(100%                  owned by Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.)                        | United                  Kingdom               |
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2776

___________

Florida Ewings, Administratrix of *

Estate of Hazel Tatum Bowers with *

will annexed, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Cleveland Robert Ellis, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Appellant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

v. *

*

Bank of America, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 29, 2008

Filed: January 23, 2009

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

-2-

Cleveland Robert Ellis appeals the district court’s1

 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) order

remanding this unlawful detainer action against him to state court. We first note that

the remand order is unreviewable to the extent it was based on the district court’s lack

of subject matter jurisdiction, but it is reviewable to the extent Ellis attempted to

remove the action from state court based on 28 U.S.C. § 1443. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1447(d) (remand order is not reviewable on appeal, except that remand of case that

was removed pursuant to § 1443 is reviewable). Upon careful review of Ellis’s

assertions to support removal under section 1443, we conclude that removal was not

warranted under that provision. See Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 800 (1966)

(removal under § 1443(1) is warranted “only if it can be predicted by reference to a

law of general application that the defendant will be denied or cannot enforce the

specified federal rights in the state courts”); City of Greenwood, Miss. v. Peacock, 384

U.S. 808, 814-15 (1966) (§ 1443(2) is available only to federal officers and persons

assisting such officers in performance of official duties); see also Bizzle v. McKesson

Corp., 961 F.2d 719, 721 (8th Cir. 1992) (in reviewing case on appeal, court may

affirm on any ground supported by record, even though that ground was not addressed

in court below).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 DELAWARE SEAL MOBILEIRON, INC. CORPORATE July 23, 2007 Fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock,
$0.0001 par value, OF MobileIron, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: This certifies that is the record holder of Incorporated under the laws of the stat e of
delaware CUSIP 60739U 10 5 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS Countersigned and Registered: American Stock transfer & trust company, LLC (New York, NY) Transfer Agent and Registrar By: Authorized signature President & Secretary Chief
Executive Officer MI 








 



 
 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the powers, designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the
Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations: Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants
in common COM PROP – as community property UNIF GIFT MIN ACT –Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT – Custodian (until age) (Cust) under Uniform Transfers (Minor) to Minors Act (State) FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE shares of the capital stock represented by within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of the substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. By THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS
WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED. Signature(s) Guaranteed: (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE
NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) X X
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated May 1,
2000 included in Ashford.com, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2000 and to all references to our firm included in this Registration Statement.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Houston, Texas

March 21, 2001
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of Titan Global Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott
      Hensell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act
              of
                1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result
              of
                operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to Titan Global Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Global
      Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.





Date:
                July 16, 2007
            By:
            */s/*Scott
              Hensell**Scott
                HensellChief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by CapSource Financial,
Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Fred C. Boethling, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CapSource
Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: September 16, 2003                  By:  /s/ Fred C. Boethling
                                               ------------------------------
                                          Name: Fred C. Boethling
                                          Chief Executive Officer
ESSX-2014.05.16-EX10.2


Exhibit 10.2


ESSEX RENTAL CORP.
1110 Lake Cook Road, Suite 220
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089




May 13, 2014




To: The "Holders" identified on Annex A hereto


Re: Amended and Restated Promissory Notes, dated December 31, 2013, between Essex Rental Corp. ("Essex") and the Holders identified on Annex A hereto, in the respective principal amounts identified on Annex A hereto (each a "Note"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed in each Note.


Gentlemen:


Essex Crane Rental Corp. and the other parties to the Loan Agreement contemplate amending and restating the Loan Agreement in accordance with the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among such parties (the "Amendment"), a copy of which has been made available to the Holders.


Essex hereby requests that each Holder waive the mandatory prepayment required pursuant to Section 5 of each Note to the extent that the Amendment constitutes a Senior Debt Refinancing; provided, however, that the waiver requested hereby of each Holder shall only be effective upon receipt by such Holder of the prepayment amount specified on Annex A hereto opposite such Holder's name plus interest accrued thereon through the date of payment.


This waiver shall be limited to a Senior Debt Refinancing resulting from the Amendment, and this waiver shall not be deemed a waiver of the required prepayment provisions of Section 5 of the Notes with respect to any other Senior Debt Refinancing.


Very truly yours,


ESSEX RENTAL CORP.


	
			
	By:
	/s/ Kory M. Glen
	 

	Name:
	Kory M. Glen
	 

	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer
	 








This waiver requested by this letter is granted subject to the terms hereof.





Exhibit 10.2






KNOTT PARTNERS, L.P.


	
			
	 
	/s/ David M. Knott
	 

	Name:
	David M. Knott
	 

	Title:
	Portfolio Manager
	 






SHOSHONE PARTNERS, L.P.


	
			
	 
	/s/ David M. Knott
	 

	Name:
	David M. Knott
	 

	Title:
	Portfolio Manager
	 






MULSANNE PARTNERS, L.P.


	
			
	 
	/s/ David M. Knott
	 

	Name:
	David M. Knott
	 

	Title:
	Portfolio Manager
	 






KNOTT PARTNERS OFFSHORE FUND, L.P.


	
			
	 
	/s/ David M. Knott
	 

	Name:
	David M. Knott
	 

	Title:
	Portfolio Manager
	 






KNOTT PARTNERS OFFSHORE (SRI) FUND LIMITED


	
			
	 
	/s/ David M. Knott
	 

	Name:
	David M. Knott
	 

	Title:
	Portfolio Manager
	 











Exhibit 10.2


Annex A




	
			
	Holder
	Principal Amount of Note
	Prepayment Amount (1)

	Knott Partners, L.P.
	$1,682,252.80
	$920,467.73

	Shoshone Partners, L.P.
	$561,182.12
	$307,058.51

	Mulsanne Partners, L.P.
	$168,247.69
	$92,059.03

	Knott Partners Offshore Fund, L.P.
	$1,211,099.99
	$662,669.99

	Knott Partners Offshore (SRI) Fund Limited
	$32,430.40
	$17,744.74






























































































_______________________
(1) Principal amount only. Excludes interest.
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 577P00

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 790

Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 5 April 2001. Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 2001.
uhln_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





1











  






 






 




  





2











  








 






 




  





3











  








 






 


 

4
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7701
JACOB MUHAMMAD FARRAKHAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; MUHAMMAD SALAAM, Islamic Chaplain; CAPTAIN HARNE; RICHARD LANHAM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1081-AM) Submitted: January 6, 1998 Decided: March 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacob Muhammad Farrakhan, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* See City of Boerne v. Flores , ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4612 (U.S. June 25, 1997) (No. 95-2074). 2 PER CURIAM:Jacob Muhammad Farrakhan, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Farrakhan's claim that the confiscation of his religious cassette tape violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ismoot in light of the Supreme Court's finding that the Act is unconstitutional. * We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions granting summary judgment on Farrakhan's remaining claimsand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farrakhan v. Moats, No. CA-95-1081-AM (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1995 and Oct. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,402,978
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         141,868
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                119,464,542
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      35,577,617
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        34,861,629
<LOANS>                                    157,887,278
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,677,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             327,896,431
<DEPOSITS>                                 234,661,489
<SHORT-TERM>                                54,056,317
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,355,935
<LONG-TERM>                                 13,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,006
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,808,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             327,896,431
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,396,995
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,881,429
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,914
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,283,338
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,672,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,346,528
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,936,810
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  235,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              20,523
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,156,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,953,343
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,953,343
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,260,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.23
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,118,877
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,530,257
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                (104,606)
<RECOVERIES>                                    16,707
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,677,358
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,677,358
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CALHOUN, BLAIR & ASSOCIATES

PETROLEUM
CONSULTANTS

4625 GREENVILLE AVENUE, SUITE 102

DALLAS, TEXAS 75206

214-522-4925

RGBLAIR@SWBELL.NET

March 1, 2006

Dorchester Minerals, L.P.

3838 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 300

Dallas, TX 75219

Gentlemen:

As independent petroleum consultants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-124544) of Dorchester Minerals, L.P. of our estimates of reserves, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to all references to our firm included in this Annual Report.



CALHOUN, BLAIR & ASSOCIATES/S/ ROBERT G. BLAIR, P.E.Robert G. Blair, P.E.President