alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 912 ’

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Konorablo D. ElOhard Pogetrr County Attornrr Mlroll aoullty Plorortills, Tens **n64r** sir;

In

### 7our lotter 

### OPTopinion in msponm

ml Co& read8 **4s** followa: 0 Stat6 or any ottiosr aity, prooinet sohool **hpal subdlriolor:**  **of**

rlnitp or ulthin the third degree by oonaxngulnlty to the **person** 60 **appointing or**  **EO rot**  **lng,** or **to 44**  otherrsrilbar OS any such board,Honorable D. BfohardVOgeS, F464 2

the Legial4ture, 

### or **OOUZ% Or**  whloh mUOh psrson so appointing or 

### voting may be 4mmber, when the 8414ry, reoa, or oonipensatioa 0r euoh appointee is to be pal& ror, direotly 

### or lnafreotly, out **0r** or frompubm **funds 0r**  **ms 0r**  0rri00 0r any kind or oheraotsrwhatsoever.- Article8 2603 and 2750, Revlard Cloil 

### Statutes, provfde for the approval of teaohers' oontraoteby the county. 8uperlntendent. For the 

### reaeoM given below, it 18 uunrcessary her UB to daterdne rrhetbftr the approval oi teaohbra' oontraot8by the superlntendsat constitutes 4 Ooeilrnation of the appofntnent 

### or employmnt OS suoh teaohrrr. **From** 4 

### oareful reqdlng of raid Art1010 4SZ, it appears that the prohibition of the statute 1snot against the employauent0r pareons related to the orricerwho oonfirm the 

### l

mploymeat butmsrely prohibits the appolntumt or oonflrmation of 

### prrtsona relatedwlthln certain degrees to the Ofilcbra appointing orVoting for the appointniant or unploynmnt:

In 4 latter opinion, dated Ootober 8, 1935, to J. E. Frle8trri44CountyAttorney, Joe 5. Alsup, Aeslstant Attornrx con& 

### l

xp remwl

4 oontrery flew. i:e a&r44 with the lottar opinlom Or Scott Oblnbs,AEslst4ntAttorney General, 

### to zoo Eocasland, 

### CountyAttorney, dated Deotimber 15, 193l, and Fi.8. AndtJrBon,Asalrtant Attorney &metal, to Pona J. Jaobon, Goantp Attornq, dated Catober 15, 193s. holding that nlatlonehlps suoh an Is involved ln the 

### present lrutanor do not fall within the nepotism rtatutse.

In our opinion Art1018 432, Fen41 Code does not apply to .thlrultuatlon andyour queatlon is theretore an4mma Im the 4rrwatiy0. Yours 

### very truly ATME??BY GE3JEiAL OF TEXAS 

# BY kg@-+

Glenn E. L4wls 

# GRLtr Assistant

APPROVEDbfAY2, 1940

ATTORNEYGENERALOr' TEXA3
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1377V

UNPUBLISHED

KIM BOYER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 22, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On September 10, 2019, Kim Boyer filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

October 12, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of 

the Office of Special Masters.

On February 19, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent stated that Petitioner “is entitled to compensation for a left 

[SIRVA] due to the flu vaccine she received on October 12, 2017.” Id. at 1. Respondent 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

further agrees that Petitioner satisfied the statutory requirements for compensation. Id. at 

4.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                         975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.13

 

This is a translation of the original text in Chinese

 

Power of Attorney

 

Wang Fang, as a shareholder of Shenzhen Xunlei Networking Technologies Co., Ltd. (“Shenzhen Xunlei”), holds 0.7% equity interest in Shenzhen Xunlei in total. I, Wang Fang, agree to assign all of the rights I have as the shareholder of 0.7% equity interests in Shenzhen Xunlei to Giganology (Shenzhen) Ltd. (“Giganology”), and hereby irrevocably grant the following rights to the authorized person for its performance during the term of this Power of Attorney:

 

I hereby authorize the authorized person to perform, on my behalf, all the rights I originally have as the shareholder of 0.7% equity interests in Shenzhen Xunlei in accordance with laws and the articles of association of Shenzhen Xunlei, including without limitation, the right to convene a shareholders meeting, to accept any notice regarding convening a shareholders meeting and the agenda, to attend the shareholders meeting of Shenzhen Xunlei and exercise all the voting rights as a shareholder of 0.7% equity interest (including, as my authorized representative, to nominate and appoint the directors, general manager, financial director and other senior management of Shenzhen Xunlei at the shareholders meeting of Shenzhen Xunlei, as well as making decision regarding the distribution of dividends), and to sell or assign the 0.7% equity interests held by me in Shenzhen Xunlei, and so forth.

 

The authorized person has the right to appoint any individual nominated by its board of directors (or executive directors) to perform the rights granted by me hereunder.

 

Unless the Business Operation Agreement entered into by Giganology, Shenzhen Xunlei, Zou Shenglong, Cheng Hao, Wang Fang, Shi Jianming, and Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd. is terminated early for any reason, the term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10) years commencing from the date hereof. As of the expiry of this Power of Attorney, I will extend the term of this Power of Attorney at the request of Giganology.

 

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]

 

1











 

	
[Execution   page of the Power of Attorney]
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Authorizer:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Wang Fang
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Wang   Fang
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
May 10, 2011
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Authorized Person:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Giganology   (Shenzhen) Ltd.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Legal   Representative/Authorized Representative
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
(Affixed with   common seal of the company)
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
May 10, 2011
    	
 
    


 

2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the  Amendment to Annual  Report of  MachineTalker,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KA for the period ending December 31, 2008 (the
"Report") I, Roland Bryan, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: November 10, 2009




By:  /s/ Roland Bryan
     --------------------------------------------------
     Roland Bryan, Chief Executive Officer and
     President (Principal Executive Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to 1,150,000 shares of Dial-Thru International
Corporation common stock issuable pursuant to common stock purchase warrants for
certain employees and consultants of Dial-Thru International Corporation, of our
report dated January 7, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Dial-Thru International Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1999.


                                 /s/  KING GRIFFIN & ADAMSON P.C.


Dallas, Texas
April 24, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Income Real Estate, L.P. 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768598
<NAME> DAVIDSON INCOME REAL ESTATE, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          24,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,919)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         12,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,529
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (34)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2012*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.220 Commercial Mortgages** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Reliv’ International, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert L.
Montgomery, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D. Albright,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert L.
      MontgomeryRobert
      L. MontgomeryChief
      Executive Officer





Date: May
11, 2009





/s/ Steven D.
      AlbrightSteven
      D. AlbrightChief
      Financial Officer





Date: May
11, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STEVEN SADDLER v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, CHRISTOPHER DIETZ, CHAIRMAN.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 7, 2009/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw-----------------------------------Kirk M. WarshawChief Financial Officer

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31176

Summary Calendar

CAROL U. TRAHAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

CITY NATIONAL BANK OF BATON ROUGE, PAUL R. NOWACKI, and KOREEN H.

WALKER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(96-CV-504-B-M2)

April 20, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carol U. Trahan appeals the judgment of the district court

granting defendants City National Bank of Baton Rouge, Paul R.

Nowacki, and Koreen H. Walker summary judgment in this case under

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) case. Finding no

error, we affirm.
2

It is undisputed that Trahan can state a prima facie case of

age discrimination. In support of their summary judgment motion,

the defendants offered as a legitimate non-discriminatory reason

for Trahan’s discharge that she was insubordinate. Because Trahan

failed to provide sufficient summary judgment evidence to show that

her age was a determinative factor in the decision to fire her, her

claim must fail. See Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, 75 F.3d 989,

993-94 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). Although we may not agree that

Trahan’s conduct amounted to insubordination, Trahan nonetheless

failed to show that her age played any factor in the decision to

discharge her.

Moreover, Trahan’s case against defendants Walker and Nowacki

must also be dismissed because they were merely supervisory

employees, not her employer. See Stults v. Conoco, Inc., 76 F.3d

651, 655 (5th Cir. 1996) (holding that the ADEA provides no basis

for individual liability for supervisory employees).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form-20-F of Aurelia Energy N.V. (the “Company”)for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kees Voormolen,certify that to the best of my knowledge:

**1****                   **TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Act of 1934; and

**2****                   **Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: March 31, 2006 | By:      | /s/ KEES VOORMOLEN                                                                                 |
|----------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | * * | Kees Voormolen*Vice President, Finance & Administration   Bluewater Energy Services B.V.* |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 12.4 Rogers Cable Inc.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule of Valuation Account  -  Allowance For Doubtful Accounts Receivable
(in thousands of Canadian dollars) Year ended December 31, Balance,
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Balance,Beginning of
    
    
    

Additions
    
    
    

Deductions
    
    
    
    EndYear
    
    
    Year
    
    
    
    (1)
    
    
    
    

(2)
    
    
    of Year2002
    
    
    
    7,465
    
    
    
    
    18,626
    
    
    
    
    (15,971
    )
    
    
    
    10,1202003
    
    
    
    10,120
    
    
    
    
    20,028
    
    
    
    
    (21,810
    )
    
    
    
    8,3382004
    
    
    
    8,338
    
    
    
    
    20,067
    
    
    
    
    (21,302
    )
    
    
    
    7,103
   (1)
    
    Represents the increase in allowance for doubtful accounts receivable charged to
expense.(2)
    
    Represents the accounts receivable written-off against the allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable. 36
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancer Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|June 28, 2004 |  | /s/ CHRISTOPHER D. HUGHESChristopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### McCollum *v.*City of Cincinnati.

(No. 25536

Decided October 2, 1935.)

*Messrs. Ratterman, Cowell & Fletcher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, *Mr. Marry J. Wernke*and *Mr. Francis T. Bartlett,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Williams, Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.