alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/       Jiang      Chen                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| JIANG      CHEN                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|  Date:  July      15, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
Order entered July 2 , 2013 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00105-CR 

DARRYL JACKSON, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. MB11-35023-F 

ORDER 

The Court REINSTATES the appeal. 

On May 13, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record has not been filed. On June 26, 2013, we received appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, signed by appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Therefore, 

we conclude findings are no longer necessary and we VACATE the May 13, 2013 order 

requiring findings. We are issuing the opinion dismissing the appeal contemporaneously wit this 

order. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  the  undersigned  officer of Goldman
Sachs Hedge Fund Strategies LLC, hereby  certifies that Goldman Sachs Hedge
Fund  Partners,  LLC's (the  "Company's")  Form 10-K for the  period  ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


                                             /s/ George H. Walker
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Name:   George H. Walker
                                             Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  March 31, 2006


     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.  1350  and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a
separate disclosure document.
News United States Air Force
 VCSAF: Potential yearlong CR forces $1.3B cutsPublished March 23, 2017
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jannelle McRae
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Stephen Wilson discussed readiness, force structure and modernization of the Air Force at the McAleese/Credit Suisse “Defense Programs” Conference in Washington, D.C., March 22, 2017.“We need congressional support to prevent a year-long continuing resolution,” he said. “A year-long CR forces me ... to solve a $1.3 billion math problem in late April ... and that will force us into actions similar to what was taken in 2013 for sequestration.”Wilson explained a potential year-long CR would affect readiness, result in halting civilian hiring, limit flying hours and prevent the start of 60 new programs.“The demand for airpower is insatiable and I predict it will only increase, so being there, being always there, comes at a cost,” Wilson said. “To ensure we remain ready to defeat both the high and low-end threats to our national security, we are making significant investments in our people, nukes, space, cyber, combat air forces and infrastructure.”In addition, he stressed the need for technological investments as rapid global technological advancements continue.“Artificial intelligence can help us by being able to go through volumes and volumes of data,” he said. “So, we have pilots that are in fact quarterbacks of a command and control apparatus that are able to sense and understand the situation and take the fight to the enemy. That’s where big data and artificial intelligence, coupled with our technology, is going to take our Air Force in a decade or so.”Wilson also discussed multi-domain command and control, and the Air Force’s key role in that future.“Winning in future high-end conflicts depends on which side can command and control forces in a degraded and contested environment, while denying the enemy the ability to do the same,” he explained. “We are going to put the enemy in the horns of multi-dilemmas so if he is able to affect one area, then I can bring effects across any of the other domains: air, land, sea, space, cyberspace and undersea.”Enhancing multi-domain command and control is Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein’s third focus area, which he outlined in a paper released in March. According to the paper, evolving command and control capabilities will require “new thinking, new training and perhaps new technologies or new ways to use older technology.” “We must be prepared to win decisively,” Wilson said. “We owe that to our nation, joint teammates and our allies.”VCSAF 



defense programs conference 



readiness 



force structure 



modernization 



Washington D.C. 



continuing resolution 



airpower 



technology 



national security
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11075 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus AUGUSTIN DURAN PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:93-CR-021-1-E

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Augustin Duran Perez appeals his sentence in a guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Relying on Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), he argues that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). Perez’s reliance on Bailey is misplaced; Bailey does not apply to § 2D1.1(b)(1). See United States v. Castillo , 77 F.3d 1480, 1499 n.34 (5th Cir.), petitionNo. 95-11075 - 2 - for cert. filed , (U.S. July 26, 1996) (No. 96-5357). The connection between the weapon and the cocaine was not clearly improbable; therefore, the findings of the district court were not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Mitchell , 31 F.3d 271, 277 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 455 (1994). AFFIRMED.
**CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BY PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

CAE Inc. (the“Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 2013 (the “Report”).

I, MarcParent, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)                                                  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                                                the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Marc Parent                                    

Marc Parent

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: June 28, 2013
NUMBER 13-07-00724-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

PDLR INVESTMENTS, LTD., ASSIGNEE 

IN INTEREST OF LA MANSION DEL PASEO, LTD., APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 357th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Independent Contractors, Inc., appealed a judgment rendered against

it in the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On February 6, 2008, the Clerk

of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due

on December 31, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this
2

Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The

Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct

the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was

advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this

notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On February 14, 2008, the

Clerk sent appellant a similar notice regarding appellant’s failure to make arrangements

for payment of the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has failed to respond to the Court’s

notices. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

respond to the Court’s notices, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See

id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered 

and filed this the 17thday of April, 2008.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCEREPORT**

** **

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. BankTrust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate BackedTrust Certificates, Kinder Morgan Debenture-Backed Series 2002-6 Trust****(the “Trust”), certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kin respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporationin respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of theTrust;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, the information in thosereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the distribution informationrequired to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by theTrustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion insuch distribution reports is included in such reports; and

 

4.     I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreementand based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee hasfulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

 
| Date: July 20,  2009            |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
|                                 |   |
| /s/ David Kolibachuk                 |   |
| David J. Kolibachuk,  Vice President |   |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00191-CR

Cecil Charles Gillis

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1139398W)

July 3, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Senrick Wilkerson v. Ramsey 1 Unit

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00790

- CV

Trial court case number: 78470

- I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

In response to the C ourt's order that plaintiff file additional materials required to

pursue his civil suit as an indigent under Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code,

plaintiff has filed a letter requesting access to legal authoriti es or, alternatively, an extension of

time to respond to the court's order. The court GRANTS the request for an extension of time in

part. The plaintiff must fulfill the missing Chapter 14 requirements by filing the appropriate

materials with the Court n o later than March 31, 2015. I f the requirements for establishing

indigency are not met at time, or the filing fee paid, the Court will dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individual ly

Date: March 3, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN: 0648-XY69

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of a public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Scallop Plan Team will meet September 28th, 2010 at the Anchorage Hilton Hotel.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 28, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Anchorage Hilton Hotel, 500 West 3rd Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99501.

*Council address*: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diana Stram, Council staff; telephone: (907) 271-2809.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Agenda: Review final Scallop Annual Catch Limit (ACL) analysis and recommend a preferred approach.

The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at *http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/​npfmc/​*

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: August 30, 2010.

Tracey L.Thompson,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-22010 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRED PAINTER.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 

### 131968 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131968 COA: 267630 Calhoun CC: 02-004122-FH WILLIAM DENNIS NOBLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

s0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147471

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147471

COA: 296256

Oakland CC: 2009

- 224545

- FC

THOMAS JAY McCLOUD, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Eliason (Docket No. 147428) and People v Davis (Docket No. 146819)

are pen ding on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve

an issue present in this case, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE

pending the decisions in those cases.
#### CITY OF ELIZABETH v. DAVID V. NAHAMA.

June 25, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 27, 2010, Archimica, Inc., 2460 W. Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807-1229, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleLisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IIMethadone Intermediate (9254)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than November 1, 2010. Dated: August 2, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-21775 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
News United States Air Force
 Focus on fall prevention can reduce serious injuriesPublished May 8, 2017
                        
                        By Darlene Y. Cowsert
                        
                        
                        Air Force Safety Center Public Affairs
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                Hundreds of fall mishaps occur across the Air Force every year that result in thousands of lost work days. From 2012-2016, Air Force personnel were involved in almost 3,500 non-sports related falls, resulting in more than 42,000 lost days of work. More significantly, there were 13 fatalities during this same timeAir Force Occupational Safety will focus on the importance of life-saving fall prevention measures during Fall Prevention Focus, May 8 – 19, 2017, marking the fourth year the Air Force has partnered with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Institute of Occupation Safety and Health to draw attention to fall prevention. During this time, Air Force organizations are encouraged to conduct activities that raise awareness of fall prevention in the workplace, and at home.“Most falls from heights result from non-compliance or inadequate training,” said Bill Parsons, the chief of Air Force Occupational Safety. “It’s incumbent upon every Airman, supervisor, and senior leader to ensure our workforce is aware of all mishap prevention requirements, have the proper equipment to prevent falls, and know how to use that equipment properly,” Parsons said. Supervisors are responsible for ensuring Airmen are trained in accordance with AFI 91-203, Air Force Consolidated Safety Instruction. Fall prevention awareness and training are generally focused on falls from heights due to the greater potential for serious injury or death. However, falls on even surfaces are much more common, according to Mike Eckert, the chief of Air Force Traffic Safety and Outreach. “Fall-related injuries are more common on wet surfaces or stumbles in walkways,” Eckert said. “Most falls are preventable if we follow basic safety practices and maintain situational awareness.” While not all Air Force organizations can set aside May 8 – 19 for Fall Prevention Focus, Parsons said it’s a good time to look at organizational safety programs and plan some time throughout the year to discuss fall prevention in the workplace and to draw attention to the need for compliance, training and awareness. “We need to remind everyone that appropriate risk management and a little common sense can drastically reduce the number of injuries from slips, trips and falls,” Parsons said.Air Force 



 



AF 



Air Force Safety Center 



prevention 



Kirtland AFB 



injury 



AFSEC 



OSHA 



Air Force Base 



Air Force Occupational Safety 



Fall Prevention Focus 



National Institute of Occupation Safety and Health 



Air Force Traffic Safety and Outreach 



Fall