alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2376 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2376

To designate the buildings occupied by the Department of Transportation 
  located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast, and 1201 4th Street, 
   Southeast, in the District of Columbia as the ``James L. Oberstar 
     United States Department of Transportation Building Complex''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2014

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Franken) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the buildings occupied by the Department of Transportation 
  located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast, and 1201 4th Street, 
   Southeast, in the District of Columbia as the ``James L. Oberstar 
     United States Department of Transportation Building Complex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The buildings occupied by the Department of Transportation located 
at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast, and 1201 4th Street, Southeast, 
in the District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the 
``James L. Oberstar United States Department of Transportation Building 
Complex'' during the period in which the buildings are occupied by the 
Department of Transportation.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    With respect to the period in which the buildings referred to in 
section 1 are occupied by the Department of Transportation, any 
reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other paper 
of the United States to those buildings shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``James L. Oberstar United States Department of 
Transportation Building Complex''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 I, Lauri A. Wood, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Peoples Financial
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies
with the requirements of that section. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material aspects, the financial operations and results of
operations of the Company. By:
    /s/ Lauri A. WoodLauri A. WoodChief Financial Officer and ControllerDate: May 13, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Emory University, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on 
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 
P.M. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue., NW, Washington, D.C.
Docket Number: 10-038. Applicant: Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. 
Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. 
Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR 46912, August 4, 2010.
Docket Number: 10-049. Applicant: Health Research Inc., New York State 
Department of Health, Menands, NY 12204-2719. Instrument: Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 
75 FR 46912, August 4, 2010.
Docket Number: 10-051. Applicant: Regents of the University of 
California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0651. Instrument: Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: 
See notice at 75 FR 46912, August 4, 2010.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

    Dated: August 24, 2010.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-21557 Filed 8-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2184 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2184

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
   Veterans Affairs located in The Dalles, Oregon, as the ``Loren R. 
                  Kaufman Memorial Veterans' Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 31, 2014

Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Merkley) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
   Veterans Affairs located in The Dalles, Oregon, as the ``Loren R. 
                  Kaufman Memorial Veterans' Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOREN R. KAUFMAN MEMORIAL VETERANS' CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 704 Veterans Drive, The 
Dalles, Oregon, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be 
known and designated as the ``Loren R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans' 
Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the community 
based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Loren R. Kaufman Memorial 
Veterans' Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549




FORM
10-Q/A




(Mark
One)




x  QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT
OF 1934




For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 OR




o  TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934




For the
transition period from _______ to ________




Commission file number
000-51252




NATIONAL
INVESTMENT MANAGERS INC.


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Florida
            59-2091510(State
      or other jurisdiction of
            (I.R.S.Employerincorporation
      or organization)
            identification
      No.)





485 Metro
Place South, Suite 275, Dublin, Ohio 43017


(Address
of principal executive offices)





(614)
923-8822


(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.




YesxNoo




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer or smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):




Large accelerated
fileroAccelerated
fileroNon-accelerated
fileroSmaller Reporting
Companyx




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)




YesoNox




As of May
9, 2008, 36,789,620 shares of $.001 par value common stock of the registrant
were outstanding.




Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes  o No x

















EXPLANATORY
NOTE: The sole purpose of this filing is to amend the first sentence of
paragraph 4 of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
certifications included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 attached hereto as required
pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K.













SIGNATURES




Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.




NATIONAL
INVESTMENT MANAGERS INC.




Registrant


Date:
      March 17, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Steven RossSTEVEN
      ROSSChief
      Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
      March 17, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Christopher W. LarkinChristopher
      W. LarkinChief
      Financial Officer
#### Leroy BUTLER, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 19, 1971.

Dixie R. Satterfield and John M. Milli-ken, Milliken & Milliken, Bowling Green, for appellant.

• John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., George F. Rabe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Butler was indicted for the crime of armed robbery denounced by KRS 433.140. His court-appointed attorney bargained for a plea and, on recommendation of the Commonwealth Attorney, the charge was amended to robbery. Butler pleaded guilty and on January 31, 1969, was sentenced to serve 10 years in the penitentiary, the minimum sentence permitted for armed robbery.1 A few months later Butler sought post-conviction relief under RCr 11.42, which was denied without a hearing. On September 1, 1970, a second application was made under that rule. He charged that the guilty plea was gained by threats and coercion and that he did not have effective assistance of counsel. After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court ruled that these claims were without merit and denied the relief. Butler appeals. We affirm.

The testimony adduced at the RCr 11.42 hearing supports the decision reached by the court. The testimony does not establish that the assistance of Butler’s counsel was inadequate. Com. v. Campbell, Ky., 415 S.W.2d 614 (1967). Butler was indicted under a statute which provides that the punishment shall be “confinement in the penitentiary for not less than ten years or for life, or by death.” Plea bargaining does not cause a constitutional infirmity. Harris v. Com., Ky., 456 S.W.2d 690 (1970); Davis v. Com., Ky., 471 S.W.2d 740 (decided October 8, 1971).

The record shows that there was evidence that Butler had placed a knife at the throat of a cabdriver and that he was later apprehended in another cab with the knife. Counsel testified that Butler sent him word from the jail that he wanted to plead guilty. A recommendation to plead guilty under the circumstances is not inadequate *109representation. Messer v. Com., Ky., 454 S.W.2d 694 (1970); Harris v. Com., Ky., 456 S.W.2d 690 (1970).

Furthermore, the complaints here asserted could have been raised in the first application for post-conviction relief. Butler was not entitled to another opportunity in these circumstances. RCr 11.42(3); Burton v. Tartar, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 168 (1964); Kinmon v. Com., Ky., 396 S.W.2d 331 (1965).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The record does not indicate whether there was or was not compliance with RCr 8.08 requiring the court not to “ **** * accept the plea without first determining that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge.”
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated March 26, 1999 with respect to the
financial statements of The Scottish Annuity Company (Cayman) Ltd. for the years
ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 included in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A
dated December 31, 1999 of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG
                                            -----------------
                                              Ernst & Young
George Town, Grand Cayman
British West Indies
March 20, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the Treasury by General Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:

1. Christopher Meade, Principal Deputy General Counsel (Department of Treasury)

2. Richard Byrd, Commissioner (Wage & Investment)

3. Christopher Wagner, Commissioner (Small Business/Self Employed)

This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

Dated: August 23, 2010.

William J. Wilkins,

Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-21327 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Consent of Independent Auditor We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended March 31, 2016 of CAE Inc. of our report dated May 19, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333 97185 and 333-155366) of CAE Inc. of our report dated May 19, 2016 referred to above.   1CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy Permit No. A123498 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 1250, Rene-Levesque Boulevard West, Suite 2500, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3B 4Y1 T: +1 514 205 5000, F: +1 514 205 5675, www.pwc.com/ca “PwC”refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership.
[No. 6155.

Decided September 28, 1906.]

#### *In the Matter of the Estate of*Henry P. Sinclaire, *Deceased.*Charles Watson, *Appellant,*v. Henry P. Sinclaire, Junior, *et al.,*Respondents.1

Appeal — Pinal Obdebs — Vacation of Ex Paste Obdeb. Upon an application to reappoint a trustee, who alleged that he had been induced to resign through fraud, the vacation of an *ex parte*order of reappointment, which could only be made on notice, is not appealable as a final order, since it does not dispose of the application.

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered September 13, 1905, after a hearing upon affidavits, vacating an order appointing a trustee.

Granted.

*E. H. Guie, J. J. McCafferty,*and *W. A. Keene,*for appellant.

*Peters & Powell,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 86 Pac. 1117.

Mount, C. J.

This appeal is taken from an order vacating an order appointing the appellant trustee of certain real estate in King county. It appears that Henry P. Sinclaire died in New York state, leaving a will by which the deceased devised certain real property in Seattle to Henry P. Sinclaire, *120Junior, William Sinclaire and Charles Watson, in trust for a stated purpose. The will was probated in New York and subsequently in this state. Thereafter the trustees accepted the trust and entered upon their duties. Thereupon the said Charles Watson resigned his trust and subsequently filed a petition in the superior court of King county, alleging, among other things, that he had been induced by fraud to resign his trust, and prayed to be"reappointed as a trustee of the estate. This petition was not served upon any person. The court made an order appointing the said Charles Watson trustee, as prayed. Thereafter the other trustees appeared and moved the court to vacate the order appointing said Watson trustee, “upon the ground that said prior order was made without any summons, process or notice of any kind upon these moving parties or either of them, or upon any person or persons interested in the estate of Henry P. Sinclaire, deceased, and that this court has no jurisdiction to make said order.” Upon a hearing based upon affidavits, the court granted the motion and vacated the order of appointment.

Respondents move to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the order appealed from is not a final order and therefore not appealable. This motion must be sustained. The order appealed from did not dismiss the appellant’s application and thereby finally dispose of the same. It simply set aside an order made *ex parte*and without notice, in a case where notice should have been given because of allegations of fraud. It left the application still pending and the truth of the allegations thereof undetermined. The effect was the same as where a judgment is vacated. We have held such orders not final and not appealable. *Nelson v. Denny,*26 Wash. 327, 67 Pac. 78; *Metler v. Metler,*28 Wash. 734, 69 Pac. 9; *State ex rel. Harris v. Superior Court,*34 Wash. 248, 75 Pac. 809.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Root, Crow, Dunbar, Hadley, and Rudkin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2377 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2377

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain 
 compensation received by public safety officers and their dependents 
                           from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2014

  Ms. Ayotte introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain 
 compensation received by public safety officers and their dependents 
                           from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Don't Tax Our Fallen Public Safety 
Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of 
paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and 
inserting ``; and'', and by inserting after paragraph (5) the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(6) amounts received pursuant to--
                    ``(A) section 1201 of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
                Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796); or
                    ``(B) a program established under the laws of any 
                State which provides monetary compensation for 
                surviving dependents of a public safety officer who has 
                died as the direct and proximate result of a personal 
                injury sustained in the line of duty.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received after December 31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7142]


In the Matter of the Designation of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan 
(TTP) Also Known as Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan Also Known as Tehrik-e-
Taliban Also Known as Pakistani Taliban Also Known as Tehreek-e-Taliban 
as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the organization known as Tehrik-e 
Taliban Pakistan (TTP), also known as Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan, also 
known as Tehrik-e-Taliban, also known as Pakistani Taliban, also known 
as Tehreek-e-Taliban, committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 12, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-21853 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports dated February 22, 2001 (except for the matters discussed in Notes 2, 3,
and 17, as to which the date is May 1, 2000), included in this Form 10-K/A, into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 File No. 333-
2914 and on Form S-3 File No. 333-57281.

                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 7, 2001