alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Christopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of Lancer Corporation, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 of LancerCorporation;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a.               All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Date:  August 12, 2004

 

 
| /s/  CHRISTOPHER D. HUGHES                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher  D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Joe Edward BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46571.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1973.

Bob Heath, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Tom Dunn, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, upon a plea of guilty, ten (10) years.

The record reflects that appellant waived his right to trial by jury and entered into a sworn written stipulation of evidence in which he stated:

> “. . . I judicially confess to the following facts and agree and stipulate that these facts are true and correct and constitute the evidence in this case: That I did shoot and kill my wife Bobbie Jean Brown on June 30 1971 without any cause that would excuse or justify my act.”

Appellant’s two grounds of error contend that his guilty plea was involuntary because his retained counsel misled him and did not fully advise him of his rights.

At the hearing on the motion for new trial, appellant testified that his counsel did not fully explain the consequences of his plea to him and led him to believe he would receive a stiffer sentence from a jury. He also testified that despite the fact that two assault with intent to murder cases were dismissed and he received a ten (10) year sentence in this case, he expected to receive either probation in the case at bar or a dismissal of the charges.

In our recent case of Gaither v. State (Tex.Cr.App.), 479 S.W.2d 50, we quoted *125Schnautz v. Beto (5 Cir.), 416 F.2d 214, where the court concluded, as we do here that:

> “All pleas of guilty are the result of some pressures or influences on the mind of the defendant . . . . This is a good time, too, to reiterate the principle that a plea is not rendered involuntary solely because it was induced as a result of a plea bargaining situation . . . . The crucial issue is whether, under all the facts and circumstances, the plea was truly voluntary. The plea must be a genuine one by a defendant who understands the situation, his rights, and the consequences of his plea and is neither deceived nor coerced.”

Appellant has failed to show that his plea was anything but voluntary. See also Ex parte Thomas (Tex.Cr.App.), 474 S.W.2d 238.

The judgment is affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2318 

To reauthorize the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2014 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Erie Canalway National Heritage 

Corridor Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ERIE CANALWAY NATIONAL HERITAGE COR4 RIDOR. 

5 Section 804(j) of the Erie Canalway National Herit6 age Corridor Act (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106– 

7 554) is amended by striking ‘‘15’’ and inserting ‘‘30’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

      I certify that the periodic report on Form 10-Q containing the financial
statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information
contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated: August 12, 2003

                                            RELIV' INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                        By:       /s/ Robert L. Montgomery
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert L. Montgomery,
                                            Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS INCLUDED
HEREIN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,919
<INVENTORY>                                     67,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,169
<PP&E>                                         371,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 501,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,498
<BONDS>                                        161,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                     204,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   501,361
<SALES>                                        433,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,279
<CGS>                                          370,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00181-CR

JOSHUA ALLEN ZIMMERER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 235th District Court

of Cooke County (CR19-00334)

September 21, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated March 6, 2007,accompanying the financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Dorchester Minerals, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Dorchester Minerals L.P., on Form S-4 (File No. 333-124544, effective May 2, 2005). 

Grant Thornton LLP 

Dallas, Texas

March 6, 2007
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 222 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 

clarify that uncertified States and Indian tribes have the authority to 

use certain payments for certain noncoal reclamation projects and acid 

mine remediation programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 

of 1977 to clarify that uncertified States and Indian 

tribes have the authority to use certain payments for 

certain noncoal reclamation projects and acid mine remediation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION. 

4 (a) RECLAMATION FEE.—Section 402(g)(6)(A) of 

5 the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 

6 (30 U.S.C. 1232(g)(6)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

7 section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (5)’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 222 IS

1 (b) FILLING VOIDS AND SEALING TUNNELS.—Sec2 tion 409(b) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclama3 tion Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1239(b)) is amended by in4 serting ‘‘and section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘section 402(g)’’. 

5 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—Section 411(h)(1)(D)(ii) of the 

6 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 

7 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(1)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘sec8 tion 403’’ and inserting ‘‘section 402(g)(6), 403, or 409’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Growth Hotel
Investors 1997 Third Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000769129
<NAME> GROWTH HOTEL INVESTORS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,857
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,212
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   508.42<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Michael Kelly Walker, * From the 350th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 13703-D.

Vs. No. 11-19-00353-CR * December 12, 2019

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal 

is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-115833; 333-89642 and 333-89640 on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-139908 and 333-147877 on Form
S-3 of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiary of our reports dated March
17, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statement of Temecula Valley
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiary, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.











Crowe
Chizek and Company LLP





Oak
Brook, Illinois


March 17,
2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,744,490
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    537,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (139,514)
<INVENTORY>                                      502,219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,826,188
<PP&E>                                         1,784,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (981,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,450,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            748,776
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        3,134
<COMMON>                                          38,346
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,537,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,450,196
<SALES>                                          784,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 826,405
<CGS>                                            453,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (1,250,609)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (424,204)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (424,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (424,204)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (424,204)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.00)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1896 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

:\SENENR\s1896--enr.xml [file 1 of 1]

        S.1896

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ``Officer 
                   Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OFFICER JEREMY TODD CHARRON POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Officer Jeremy Todd Charron Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Institute of Standards and Technology

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Institute of Standards and Technology announces a                               ( print page 53278)                            Workshop on Polymers for Photovoltaic Systems.                    

# DATES:

The workshop will be held over two days, Thursday, September 23, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Friday, September 24, 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at NIST's Gaithersburg campus, 100 Bureau Drive, Employee Lounge, Building 101, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Please note admittance instructions under the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section of this notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Joannie Chin, Polymeric Materials Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, (301) 975-6815,                         *joannie.chin@nist.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    All attendees must contact Joannie Chin,                     *joannie.chin@nist.gov*, (301) 975-6815, by September 9 to pre-register and have appropriate government-issued photo ID to gain entry to NIST. Agenda items for the meeting include: presentations on polymeric materials used in photovoltaic systems; testing, performance, and reliability of polymers in photovoltaic systems; impact of polymers on safety standards and codes; breakout sessions to obtain stakeholder perspectives on the above mentioned topics; presentation of a NIST-developed accelerated aging and service life prediction methodology to polymers used in photovoltaic systems.                

Dated: August 26, 2010.

Harry S. Hertz,

Director, Baldrige National Quality Program.

[FR Doc. 2010-21700 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-13-P