alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 8, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.8 Saving and Investment by Sector 1** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
       PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jon Young, Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Star Gold
  Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
        the Company, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and to which
        this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report)
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:
      Name:
      Title:
      Date: | /s/ Jon Young
        JON YOUNG
      Chief Financial Officer
      March 30, 2004
| | ---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
  by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
  its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18

- 0328

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. JUAN ANASTASIO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant, through counsel, has filed a motion for extension of time within which to file his reply brief. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’s reply brief shall be filed on or before October 9 , 2020. No furt her extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2020

09/09/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0328
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1856 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1856

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to make technical corrections to 
              the new border tunnels and passages offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFENSE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 27 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by redesignating section 554 added by section 551(a) of the 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 
109-295; 120 Stat. 1389) (relating to border tunnels and passages) as 
section 555.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections for chapter 27 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 554, ``Border tunnels and passages'', and inserting the 
following:

``555. Border tunnels and passages.''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL FORFEITURE.

    Section 982(a)(6)of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``554'' and inserting ``555''.

SEC. 3. DIRECTIVE TO THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION.

    Section 551(d) of the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295; 120 Stat. 1390) is 
amended in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) by striking ``554'' and inserting 
``555''.

            Passed the Senate July 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1856

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make technical corrections to 
              the new border tunnels and passages offense.
```
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of                1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of                operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                   |                            |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                             |                              |                       |
| Date:                January 29, 2007 | By:                          | */s/*Scott              Hensell |
|                                  | Scott                Hensell           |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

                        MONTHLY SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                             FIRST USA BANK, N.A.


                       BANC ONE CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
                                 SERIES 1996-A



     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First USA Bank, N.A.,
as Servicer ("First USA"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of November 1, 1994 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"), as
supplemented by the Series 1996-A Supplement dated as of March 27, 1996 (as
amended and supplemented, the"Series Supplement"), between First USA, as Seller
and Servicer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, does hereby certify as
follows:

     1.   Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
meanings as set forth in the Agreement or Series Supplement, as applicable.

     2.   First USA is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.

     3.   The undersigned is a Servicing Officer.

     4.   This Certificate relates to the Distribution Date occuring on 15-Feb-
                                                                        -------
01.
--

     5.   As of the date hereof, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, the
Servicer has performed in all material respects all its obligations under the
Agreement through the Monthly Period preceding such Distribution Date.

     6.   As of the date hereof, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, no
Pay Out Event has been deemed to have occurred on or prior to such Distribution
Date.

     7.   As of the date hereof, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, no
Lien has been placed on any of the Receivables other than pursuant to the
Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this
Certificate this 9th day of Feb-01.
                 ---        ------


     FIRST USA BANK, N.A.
     as Servicer

     By: /s/ Tracie H. Klein
         --------------------------
         TRACIE H. KLEIN
         First Vice President
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Appellant, v. Paul NELSON and Kathleen Nelson, wife, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 31, 1974.

Paul Hunley, Department of Highways, Perry M. Lewis, Frankfort, Harvey G. Ershig, Dorsey & Sullivan, Henderson, for appellant.

Charles J. Kamuf, Beard, Rummage, Kamuf & Yewell, Owensboro, for appellees.

Memorandum Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Affirming.*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

 

No. 02-20316

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

LATRENDA SHENAN DRIVER,

 DefendantAppellant.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-711-1

-----------------------------------------------------------

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After the perpetration of an extensive credit and mail fraud scheme, Latrenda Shenan Driver

pled guilty to fraud in connection with an access device in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2).

Driver appeals the amount of restitution ordered.
-2-

Though Driver’s limited waiver of the right to appeal does permit this appeal of the ordered

restitution as a violation of the statutory limits on restitution, it is clear that the district court ordered

restitution in accordance with the amount stipulated to by the partiesin the plea agreement -- exactly

as permitted by 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3). The motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED. The sentence

imposed, including the amount of restitution, is AFFIRMED.
#### In re PENNSYLVANIA CENTRAL BREWING CO. FIDELITY-PHILADELPHIA TRUST CO., Trustee for Bondholders under Mortgage, etc., Appellant, v. George P. WEAVER, Paul G. Collins, and John Memolo, Trustees of the Pennsylvania Central Brewing Co., Debtor, Appellees.

No. 6414.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Nov. 26, 1937.

Roland C. Heisler and Drinker, Biddle & Reath, all of Philadelphia, Pa.,, and Walter L. Hill and O’Malley, Hill, Harris & Harris, all of Scranton, Pa., for appellant.

John H. Bigelow, of Hazleton, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and WATSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This matter having come on for hearing and it being conceded by counsel of the trustee that in view of certain decisions rendered since the entry by the court below, 18 F.Supp. 458, of its order of July 16, 1936, the said order cannot now -be sustained. Now therefore, the said order is hereby vacated.
|                                        | Exhibit 99(a) 
|--------------------------------------- | --------------
|Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-1 |               
|                                        |               
|                                        |               
|Original Principal Class A              | 900,771,000.00
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)         | 900,771.00    
|Original Principal Class M              | 112,596,000.00
|Number of Class M Bonds (000's)         | 112,596.00    
|                                        |               
|Distribution Date                       |               
|                                        |               
|                                        |               
|CLASS A                                 |               
|Class A Principal Distribution          |               
|Class A Interest Distribution           |               
|                                        |               
|CLASS M                                 |               
|Class M Principal Distribution          | 41,876,201.90 
|Class M Interest Distribution           |               
|                                        |
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 10, 2011*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.116 Property-Casualty Insurance Companies** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         293,455
<SECURITIES>                                   285,715
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               700,558
<PP&E>                                         762,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                (277,457)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,733,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,619,965
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       295,219
<OTHER-SE>                                     818,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,733,413
<SALES>                                        270,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  653,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               952,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,345,432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,345,432)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,345,432)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. McDONALD

No. 451P00

Case below: 136 N.C. App. 849

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 20 December 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Investors
First Staged Equity L.P. 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768834
<NAME> INVESTORS FIRST STAGED EQUITY L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      157
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (85)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          51,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,733)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         46,837
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,517)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,983
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (96.45)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
RANDY D. CHAMBERS and MARTHA CHAMBERS, et al

. ,

Petitioner s ,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
LLC

,

Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REH EARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5156

Opinion filed December 9, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Ran d y D. Chambers and Martha Chambers, pro se , Petitioner s

.

Joseph Troendle and Justin E. Hekkanen of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville; Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; and William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort
Lauderdale , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                          1,561
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                     661
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  137
<PP&E>                         49,659
<DEPRECIATION>                (29,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 20,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,725
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                      1,399 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   22,899
<SALES>                         4,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,415
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (105)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     (105)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (0.088)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.088)<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Partner equity - 1,190 Partnership units
outstanding.
<F2> Per Partnership Unit in thousands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7252

JAMES POLING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center; CARL LEGURSKY, Former Warden

W.V.P.; GEORGE TRENT, Warden W.V.P./Mt. Olive

Correctional Complex; NICHOLAS J. HUN, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-96-562-2)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Poling, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant

that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to

the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We

accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**





**INVISA, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In connection with the Annual Report of Invisa, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Herbert M. Lustig, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














*/s/*  *Herbert M. Lustig*


________________________________


Herbert M. Lustig


President and Chief Executive Officer


February 4, 2005
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEONARD CLARK.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.