alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BTU_2014.03.31_EX.10.4






Exhibit 10.4


AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
2004 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




 WHEREAS, Peabody Energy Corporation (the “Company”) adopted and maintains the Peabody Energy Corporation 2004 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), and all capitalized terms used but not defined herein are defined in the Plan;
 
     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan, (i) the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the right to amend the Plan and (ii) the Administrator may amend the terms of outstanding Awards under the Plan without the Participant’s consent, so long as such amendment does not adversely affect the Participant’s rights under the Award; and 


     WHEREAS, the Board has authorized and directed that the Plan be amended to provide that neither the Board nor the Administrator may take actions to re-price stock options granted under the Plan. 
  
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of March 12, 2014, as follows: 


 1.  The last paragraph of Section 16 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, but subject to the provisions of Section 12, neither the Board nor the Administrator shall be permitted to (i) amend a stock option granted under the Plan to reduce its exercise price; (ii) cancel a stock option granted under the Plan and re-grant a stock option with a lower exercise price than the original exercise price of the cancelled stock option; (iii) cancel a stock option or SAR granted under the Plan in exchange for cash or another equity award; or (iv) take any other action (whether in the form of an amendment, cancellation or replacement grant) that has the effect of re-pricing a stock option granted under the Plan.


 2.  In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  


	
		
	 
	PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION

	 
	 

	 
	By: /s/ Sharon D. Fiehler                                         

	 
	Sharon D. Fiehler

	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAUL RODRIGUEZ.

December 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 relating to the stock
incentive plans of The Wiser Oil Company (Nos. 33-44171, 33-62441, 33-44172,
333-22525 and 333-15083) of our report dated February 24, 2000 appearing on page
F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas,
February 24, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's
Form 10-QSB for the six months ended September 30, 1997, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         263,205
<SECURITIES>                                    86,840
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                    411,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,149,754
<PP&E>                                       6,320,767
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,088,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,583,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          379,831
<BONDS>                                      1,581,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,648
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,617,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,583,907
<SALES>                                      1,189,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,513,570
<CGS>                                          765,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,530,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,869)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00351-CV

Joshua M. HINSON and Louise Hinson,

Appellants

v.

Don LEESEBURG and Carla M. Leeseburg,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-16610

Honorable Solomon Casseb III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

this appeal are taxed against Appellants. 

SIGNED October 8, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL LA PEIRA.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2290 

To increase the maximum penalty for unfair and deceptive practices relating 

to advertising of the costs of air transportation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 5, 2014 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To increase the maximum penalty for unfair and deceptive 

practices relating to advertising of the costs of air transportation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Real Transparency in 

5 Airfares Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR UNFAIR AND DECEP7 TIVE AIRFARE ADVERTISING PRACTICES. 

8 Section 46301(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2290 IS

1 ‘‘(7) PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS OF UNFAIR AND DE2 CEPTIVE AIRFARE ADVERTISING PRACTICES.—Notwith3 standing paragraph (1), the maximum civil penalty as4 sessed on a person for an unfair or deceptive practice in 

5 violation of section 41712 and described in section 399.84 

6 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any cor7 responding similar regulation or ruling), shall be— 

8 ‘‘(A) $55,000; or 

9 ‘‘(B) if the person is an individual or small 

10 business concern, $2,500.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Statement of Computation of Earnings per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     For the Three Months         For the Nine Months
                                         Ended Sept. 30             Ended Sept. 30
                                   ------------------------     ------------------------

                                       2000        1999             2000        1999
                                   -----------  -----------     -----------  -----------
<S>                                <C>          <C>             <C>          <C>

Net Earnings                       $ 1,158,000  $ 3,279,000     $ 6,870,000  $ 9,750,000
                                   ===========  ===========     ===========  ===========

Weighted average common
   shares outstanding               15,005,000   15,005,000      15,005,000   15,005,000
                                   ===========  ===========     ===========  ===========

Basic and diluted earnings
   per share of common stock       $       .08  $       .22     $       .46  $       .65
                                   ===========  ===========     ===========  ===========
</TABLE>
# OitiuL1AL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0575
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. KELLY FRANK,

Defendant and Appellant. 

## ; OCT 3 1 2022 Bowen Greenwood Ckak of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Kelly Frank moves this Court for appointment ofcounsel. He states that this is a "step in the criminal case" pursuant to a 1954 decision from the United States Supreme Court. Frank provides that he filed a "Motion in theNature ofWrit ofError Coram Nobis Including Brief' in the Teton County District Court. He states that he appeals the court's decision. Frank appeals a September 14, 2022 Order, denying his Motion, after deeming it a petition for postconviction relief, pursuant to § 46-21-102(a), MCA. There is no right to the appointment ofcounsel in a postconviction proceeding for relief, although a court may order the assignment ofcounsel under the circumstances outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA. Frank represented himselfin his postconviction proceeding before the District Court. He has not demonstrated the existence ofextraordinary circumstances tojustify appointment ofcounsel, pursuant to §46-8-104(3), MCA. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Frank'sMotion for Appointment ofCounsel is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Kelly Frank along with a copy ofthis Court's Appellate Handbook. DATEDthis t day ofOctober, 2022. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 10/31/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0575
#### EDGAR v. EDGAR.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied .without opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12268 and #12269]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Texas (FEMA-1931-DR), dated 08/03/2010.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Alex.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/30/2010 through 08/14/2010.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         08/14/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/04/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/03/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of TEXAS, dated 08/03/2010, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/30/2010 and continuing through 08/14/2010.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Lisa Lopez-Suarez,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-21417 Filed 8-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  RS INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
  DELAWARE CUSIP 76658B 10 0 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS this certifies that is the record holder of FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF
  COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF RIGHTSIDE GROUP, LTD. transferable on the books of the
  Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
  Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until
  countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. AUTHORIZED
  SIGNATURE WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
  signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: By: TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR (NEW YORK, NY)
  COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN
  STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
  SEAL JULY 11, 2013 SECRETARY & GENERAL COUNSEL 

  






 


 












	
  

  	
  The Corporation
  shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement
  of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
  optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or
  series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such
  preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s
  Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT – as
  tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of
  survivorship and not as tenants in common COM PROP – as community property
  UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors
  Act (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT – Custodian (until age ) (Cust) under Uniform
  Transfers (Minor) to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be
  used though not in the above list. FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell(s),
  assign(s) and transfer(s) unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS,
  INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) shares of the capital stock represented by
  within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
  attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
  Corporation with full power of the substitution in the premises. Dated X X
  NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
  WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
  ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. Signature(s) Guaranteed: By
  THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION,
  (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
  MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO
  S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
  SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.203 Net Interbank Transactions** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE WASHINGTON.

September 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. McLane, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James W. McLane

James W. McLane
Chief Executive Officer
December 11, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1866 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1866

    To amend title 49, United States Code, to exempt certain local 
restrictions from review under the airport noise and access restriction 
                            review program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2007

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, to exempt certain local 
restrictions from review under the airport noise and access restriction 
                            review program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AIRPORT NOISE AND ACCESS RESTRICTION REVIEW PROGRAM.

    Section 47524(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (5)(B);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) a local restriction limiting the hours of operation 
        of a publicly-owned airport maintained by the owner of the 
        airport, if the owner had previously maintained a local 
        restriction limiting the hours of operation of the airport that 
        was disallowed by a court before 1985, and the owner has--
                    ``(A) without interruption since 1985, maintained a 
                policy of encouraging voluntary limitation of the hours 
                of operation of the airport;
                    ``(B) without interruption since 1985, imposed 
                restrictions limiting the capacity of the airport 
                terminal; and
                    ``(C) developed and implemented an environmental 
                management system that is certified as conforming to 
                the International Standards Organization 14001 
                Environmental Management System Standard.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          44,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,010,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,219,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,676,777
<PP&E>                                      18,573,341
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,779,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,333,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,004,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,660
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,495,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,333,945
<SALES>                                     26,582,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,582,020
<CGS>                                       20,416,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,416,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,518,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             382,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                264,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            264,369
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   264,369
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
#### LYNN v. BURNETTE

No. 418PA99-2

Case below: 353 N.C. 266

134 N.C. App. 731

Joint motion to withdraw case allowed 18 April 2001.
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.5
















CONSENT OF MATHIEU SAVARD







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Mathieu Savard, participated in the preparation of the technical entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, 2013 Exploration Program, Coulon Project, Quebec Mines Virginia Inc., December 2013” concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.1.4 Geological Setting; 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.1.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,














				
	 
	/S/

Mathieu Savard

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

Mathieu Savard, B.Sc., P.Geo.

	 
	 












May 15, 2014
#### REVELL v. FAIRCLOTH.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.