alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14
                                 CODE OF CONDUCT


<PAGE>


          EXHIBIT 14.1 MACHINETALKER, INC. - CORPORATE CODE OF CONDUCT

MachineTalker,  Inc. is a corporate  entity that is responsible for the physical
and financial well-being of its community,  its employees, its customers and its
shareholders.  Each individual  person involved in the operation of this company
is called upon to maintain this obligation.

This  Corporate  Code of Conduct has been  adopted by the Board of  Directors to
provide a guideline for conducting  company  business in a manner to support our
collective  responsibility  and to maintain  our  reputation  for holding to the
highest standards of honesty and integrity.


RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

All individuals who represent this Company must:

A.   Conduct  themselves  and  company  business  with  honesty  and  integrity,
     avoiding  both actual and apparent  conflicts  of personal or  professional
     interests.

B.   Promote ethical behavior in the work  environment as a responsible  partner
     among peers.

C.   Comply  with  laws,  rules  and  regulations  of  federal,  state and local
     governments,  and other appropriate  private and public regulatory agencies
     that  govern our  business.  While it is  difficult  to know the details of
     these laws, it is important to know enough to determine when to seek advice
     from work team leaders or other appropriate management personnel.

D.   Promptly  report  dishonest,  unethical  or  illegal  activities  by  other
     employees to appropriate parties within the Human Resources, Legal or other
     appropriate departments.

E.   Provide  full,  fair,  accurate,  timely and  understandable  reporting and
     disclosure in documents  prepared for shareholders or filed with the SEC or
     in any other public communication.

F.   Responsibly  use  and  control  all  tangible  and  intangible  assets  and
     resources employed or entrusted from the company. We are obliged to respect
     the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of our work.

G.   Comply with this Code of Conduct  knowing  that failure to do so may result
     in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.


REPORTING AND ENFORCEMENT

Any person  involved in the  operation  of this  Company who  suspects  possible
violations  of this  Code of  Conduct  or  other  corporate  policies  or  laws,
including those pertaining to government contracting,  has the responsibility to
disclose  such  violation  to the  Management  or the Board of  Directors.  Such
reporting will be handled  confidentially  and there will be no form of reprisal
for doing so. The Company will investigate  fully all matters related to alleged
violations and take appropriate action.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         License No.               Name/address         Date reissued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
019460NF.....................  USCA Forwarding--     July 10, 2008.
                                Seabell Express
                                Inc., 50 Harrison
                                Street, Ste. 309,
                                Hoboken, NJ 07030.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. E8-24620 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 10.9
  OMEPRAZOLE SUPPLY AGREEMENT
 AMENDMENT NO. 4
 This Amendment Amendment SANTARUS INTERCHEM UQUIFA Effective Date
 Whereas Agreement
 Whereas * * * * * *
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore
 1.
 SCHEDULE C
  Freight Terms: *  *  *
 Shipping Method:
 Price: * * *
 * * *  * * *
 
 ***
    
    Certain information on this page has been omitted
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential
treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.




---



##### 



2.
 3.
 4.
 In Witness Whereof
 Santarus, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
    
    Interchem Trading Corporationd/b/a Interchem Corporation,
a New Jersey corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Warren HallName:
    
    Warren Hall
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joseph PizzaTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President, Product
    
    Name:
    
    Joseph PizzaDevelopment and Manufacturing
    
    Title:
    
    PresidentUnion Quimico Farmaceutica, S.A.,
a corporation of SpainBy:
    
    /s/ Mark RobbinsName:
    
    Mark RobbinsTitle:
    
    Chief Executive
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Investors
First-Staged Equity L.P. 1999 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768834
<NAME> INVESTORS FIRST-STAGED EQUITY L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      872
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          48,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         41,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,360
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,720
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,479
<EPS-BASIC>                                      90.00<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT MEDINA.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      The undersigned, Michael Mak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
      December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Date:  April 16, 2006
                                /s/ Michael Mak
                                ---------------
                                Michael Mak, Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 11.2

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rogers Cable Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of Ontario (the Company) for the period
ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                    |  |                                                                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ John H. ToryJohn H. Tory
Chairman and co-Chief Executive Officer   
|                   
|Dated: May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Edward RogersEdward Rogers
President and co-Chief Executive Officer
|                   
|Dated: May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Donald W. HuffDonald W. Huff
Senior Vice President, Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's
Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         804,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    258,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,444,732
<PP&E>                                       6,184,106
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,030,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,106,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          314,647
<BONDS>                                      2,218,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,739
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,477,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,016,654
<SALES>                                      1,777,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,340,467
<CGS>                                        1,145,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,418,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.009)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 JAVA EXPRESS, Inc. Certification Of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Java Express, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, Mark Burdge hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. Date: June 26, 2009 /s/ Mark Burdge Mark Burdge Principal Executive Officer
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 24, 2009    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Stephen J. Sperco        |   |
| Stephen      J. Sperco       |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6141

REGINALD HARDY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:14-cv-00748-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: June 15, 2015 Decided: June 26, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Hardy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Hardy seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Hardy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

the motions for a certificate of appealability and appointment 

of counsel, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 
3

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133517 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133517 COA: 273477 Genesee CC: 04-013795-FC EDWARD DONALD BURLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 10.3


 








NTN BUZZTIME, INC.


2014 INCENTIVE BONUS


CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER
(“EXECUTIVE”)


 


The amount of the Executive’s incentive bonus for the
2014 calendar year shall be earned by the Executive as follows:


 


		·	A bonus up to $28,125 if NTN Buzztime, Inc. (the “Company”), achieves certain revenue
goals that are determined and approved by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”).



 


		·	A bonus up to $28,125 if operational cost budgets that are determined ad approved by the Board
are met.



 


		·	A bonus up to $45,000 if the Company is able to significantly improve consumer engagement. Criteria
will be established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance/Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board.



 


		·	A bonus up to $11,250 if the Company achieves certain cost reduction goals related to the delivery
of its product and platform as determined and approved by the Committee.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2144 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2144

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply Medicare 
   competitive bidding to vacuum erection systems and to require the 
  Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement a national mail 
                    order program for such devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2014

Mrs. McCaskill introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply Medicare 
   competitive bidding to vacuum erection systems and to require the 
  Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement a national mail 
                    order program for such devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Unnecessary Medicare 
Payments (PUMP) Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF MEDICARE COMPETITIVE BIDDING TO VACUUM ERECTION 
              SYSTEMS AND REQUIRING A NATIONAL MAIL ORDER PROGRAM FOR 
              SUCH DEVICES.

    (a) Inclusion in Program.--Section 1847(a)(2) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-3(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Vacuum erection systems.--Vacuum erection 
                systems covered as prosthetic devices described in 
                section 1861(s)(8) for which payment would otherwise be 
                made under section 1834(h).''.
    (b) National Mail Order Program.--Section 1847(a)(1)(D) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-3(a)(1)(D)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iv) National mail order program for 
                        vacuum erection systems.--The Secretary shall 
                        phase in a national mail order program under 
                        this section for vacuum erection systems 
                        described in paragraph (2)(D). The first round 
                        of competition for such program shall occur in 
                        2016, with contracts taking effect after the 
                        competition is completed. Chapter 35 of title 
                        44, United States Code (commonly referred to as 
                        the `Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995') shall 
                        not apply to the first round competition for 
                        such program.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANKLIN MINCEY.

September 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1855

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide relief to 
  individuals from the penalty for failure to pay estimated taxes on 
amounts attributable to the alternative minimum tax in cases where the 
    taxpayer was not subject to the alternative minimum tax in the 
                        preceding taxable year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2007

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Allard, 
and Mr. Brownback) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide relief to 
  individuals from the penalty for failure to pay estimated taxes on 
amounts attributable to the alternative minimum tax in cases where the 
    taxpayer was not subject to the alternative minimum tax in the 
                        preceding taxable year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``AMT Penalty Protection Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. ESTIMATED TAX SAFE HARBOR FOR ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX 
              LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 6654 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to failure by individual to pay estimated income tax) is 
amended by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n) and by 
inserting after subsection (l) the following new subsection:
    ``(m) Safe Harbor for Certain Alternative Minimum Tax Payers.--In 
the case of any individual with respect to whom there was no liability 
for the tax imposed under section 55 for the preceding taxable year--
            ``(1) any required payment calculated under subsection 
        (d)(1)(B)(i) shall be determined without regard to any tax 
        imposed under section 55,
            ``(2) any annualized income installment calculated under 
        subsection (d)(2)(B) shall be determined without regard to 
        alternative minimum taxable income, and
            ``(3) the determination of the amount of the tax for the 
        taxable year for purposes of subsection (e)(1) shall not 
        include the amount of any tax imposed under section 55.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```