alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 980 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 980

Authorizing the Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in 
           judicial proceedings to enforce certain subpoenas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

 Mr. Conyers submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in 
           judicial proceedings to enforce certain subpoenas.

    Resolved, That the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary is 
authorized to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings in any 
Federal court of competent jurisdiction, on behalf of the Committee on 
the Judiciary, to seek declaratory judgments affirming the duty of any 
individual to comply with any subpoena that is a subject of House 
Resolution 979 issued to such individual by the Committee as part of 
its investigation into the firing of certain United States Attorneys 
and related matters, and to seek appropriate ancillary relief, 
including injunctive relief.
    Sec. 2.  The Committee on the Judiciary shall report as soon as 
practicable to the House with respect to any judicial proceedings which 
it initiates or in which it intervenes pursuant to this resolution.
    Sec. 3.  The Office of General Counsel of the House of 
Representatives shall, at the authorization of the Speaker, represent 
the Committee on the Judiciary in any litigation pursuant to this 
resolution. In giving that authorization, the Speaker shall consult 
with the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group established pursuant to clause 
8 of Rule II.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         113,852                 112,341
<SECURITIES>                                     5,061                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,530                  18,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,968                   1,523
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,584                 137,208
<PP&E>                                          17,664                  12,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,546                   2,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,878                 147,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,542                  28,291
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           179                     172
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,957                 118,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,878                 147,216
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,073                  73,007
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,266                  26,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,483                  42,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,798                   1,750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15                     153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,928                   4,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,918                   1,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,010                   2,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,010                   2,645
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.31                    0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27                    0.08


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-121642, 333-130787, and 333-152187 on Form S-8 and Registration No. 333-158778 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 23, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Bill BarrettCorporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of new accounting guidance), and the effectiveness of Bill Barrett Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bill Barrett Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Denver, Colorado 

February 23, 2010
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Pieter A Van der Vorst, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sybase, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004      /s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORST       Pieter A. Van der Vorst   Senior Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer  
41
Exhibit 12.1**Section 302 Certification****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Edward S. Rogers, Vice Chairman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Rogers Cable Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date:*March 8, 2006*                 */s/ Edward S. Rogers*       Edward S. Rogers      Vice Chairman
#### Ex parte’s Betty Davis McWILLIAMS and Vernice R. McWilliams.

No. 47727.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1973.

Byron Chappell and Joel T. Howard, Lubbock, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Buddy Stevens, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

GREEN, Commissioner.

This is a joint application for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioners were convicted of robbery by firearms in the 134th District Court of Lamb County, with a punishment of 20 years being assessed against each. Sentence was pronounced against each petitioner on February 25, 1972. They appealed, and this Court affirmed their convictions on June 27, 1973.1 Petitioners were continuously confined in the county jail of Lamb County from Feburary 25, 1972 to June 29, 1973, on which date they escaped, and were at liberty for approximately five hours before they were recaptured and again placed in custody.

Petitioners sought to have the trial court give them credit from the date of their sentencing on February 25, 1972 to July 27, 1973, the date that the mandate of ths Court was filed in the trial court. A hearing was had in the trial court, at which the above facts were established. The trial court denied the application, and refused to give credit for such period of time, and ordered the record of the proceedings forwarded to this Court.

For the reasons stated in Vessels v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 259, Ex parte Washburn, Tex.Cr.App., 459 S.W.2d 637, and Ex Parte Griffith, Tex.Cr.App., 457 S.W.2d 60, petitioners are constitutionally entitled to credit for time spent in jail *16from the date of the sentences, February 25, 1972, until the date the mandate was issued by this Court. See, also, North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656; Robinson v. Beto (5th Cir.), 426 F.2d 797. The fact that petitioners escaped from jail, and for a few hours on June 29, 1973, after this Court had affirmed the judgments were at liberty, is not sufficient cause to deny them their constitutional rights to such jail credit which they had earned by virtue of their confinement.

The trial court will take such action as is necessary and proper to give petitioners credit for jail time in accordance with the provisions of this opinion. See Ex parte Griffith, supra.

Opinion approved by the Court.

1

. McWilliams v. State, 436 S.W.2d 630.
#### John RENEER v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 31, 1974.

John Reneer, pro se.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Thomas R. Emerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Affirming.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Alan F. Krock herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc.(“PMC”), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 3, 2005, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.

 
| Date:  |    May 3, 2005 |   | By: | /s/ Alan F. Krock |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|-----|-------------------|--------|
|   | Alan F. Krock                      |
|   | Vice President, Finance            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and       |
|   | Principal Accounting  Officer      |

 

----
Exhibit 10.11

 

This is a translation of the original text in Chinese

 

Power of Attorney

 

Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd., as a shareholder of Shenzhen Xunlei Networking Technologies Co., Ltd. (“Shenzhen Xunlei”), holds 6.7% equity interest in Shenzhen Xunlei in total. We, Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd., agree to assign all of the rights we have as the shareholder of 6.7% equity interests in Shenzhen Xunlei to Giganology (Shenzhen) Ltd. (“Giganology”), and hereby irrevocably grant the following rights to the authorized person for its performance during the term of this Power of Attorney:

 

We hereby authorize the authorized person to perform, on our behalf, all the rights we originally have as the shareholder of 6.7% equity interests in Shenzhen Xunlei in accordance with laws and the articles of association of Shenzhen Xunlei, including without limitation, the right to convene a shareholders meeting, to accept any notice regarding convening a shareholders meeting and the agenda, to attend the shareholders meeting of Shenzhen Xunlei and exercise all the voting rights as a shareholder of 6.7% equity interest (including, as our authorized representative, to nominate and appoint the directors, general manager, financial director and other senior management of Shenzhen Xunlei at the shareholders meeting of Shenzhen Xunlei, as well as making decision regarding the distribution of dividends), and to sell or assign the 6.7% equity interests held by us in Shenzhen Xunlei, and so forth.

 

The authorized person has the right to appoint any individual nominated by its board of directors (or executive directors) to perform the rights granted by us hereunder.

 

Unless the Business Operation Agreement entered into by Giganology, Shenzhen Xunlei, Zou Shenglong, Cheng Hao, Wang Fang, Shi Jianming, and Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd. is terminated early for any reason, the term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10) years commencing from the date hereof. As of the expiry of this Power of Attorney, we will extend the term of this Power of Attorney at the request of Giganology.

 

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]

 

1











 

[Execution page of the Power of Attorney]

 

 

	
Authorizer:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Guangzhou Shulian   Information Investment Co., Ltd.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
May 10,   2011
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Authorized Person:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Giganology   (Shenzhen) Ltd.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Legal   Representative/Authorized Representative
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
(Affixed with common seal of the company)
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
May 10,   2011
    	
 
    


 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Annual Report of MTC Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: March 19, 2003


                                                     /s/  DAVID S. GUTRIDGE
                                                  -----------------------
                                            Name        David S. Gutridge
                                          Title:     Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21156]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f6b6d7e7b7a7e717e73666c766c5f79727c31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="681c1a090c0d09060904111b011b280e050b460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201207-001.
    Title: Terminal 6 Lease Agreement Between the Port of Portland and 
ICTSI Oregon, Inc.
    Parties: Port of Portland and ICTSI Oregon, Inc.
    Filing Party: Paul D. Coleman, Esq.; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman; 1050 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., 10th Floor; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment changes the commencement date of the 
agreement to February 12, 2011, updates terminal contracts, and updates 
the list of terminal assets to be transferred to the Lessee under the 
agreement.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: August 20, 2010.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21156 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 185 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 185

   To restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR THOSE DETAINED BY THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Title 10.--Section 950j of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Limited Review of Military Commission Procedures and 
Actions.--Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or in section 
2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision, and 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court, justice, or judge 
shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of 
action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the 
date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating 
to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under 
this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of 
military commissions under this chapter.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by this Act shall--
            (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; 
        and
            (2) apply to any case that is pending on or after the date 
        of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```