alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of
Dorchester Minerals, L.P., (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Dorchester Minerals Management GP LLC, General Partner of Dorchester
Minerals Management LP, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                            
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                    |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ William Casey McManemin
|                    |  |  |  | William Casey McManemin    
|Date: March 6, 2008 |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ H.C. Allen, Jr.        
|                    |  |  |  | H.C. Allen, Jr.            
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ,

 a/k/a “The Big Guy,”, a/k/a “Santa Claus,”

2. ABEL SANCHEZ-LEON,

 a/k/a Joel Lopez,

 A/k/a Raul Marez-Ortiez,

3. OCTAVIO QUEZADA-PEREZ,

 a/k/a “Tavi,”

4. FLODINA BELETSO GALLEGOS,

5. GUADALUPE RUIZ-GUARDADO,

 a/k/a “Lupe,”

6. JULIO MARES-RUIZ,

 a/k/a “Mariano,”

7. LUIS JORGE MARTINEZ-VALDIVA, and

8. ROBERT MASON BYAS,

 a/k/a “Robin,”

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#424) on November 15, 2012, by Defendant Guadalupe Ruiz-Guardado. The Court construes

this Notice as a motion to change his/her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the

parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 439 Filed 11/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for February 13, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for May 20, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for November 30, 2012, and the

December 10, 2012, trial date are VACATED as to Defendant Ruiz-Guardado.

Dated this 26th day of November, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 439 Filed 11/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF H. JEROME SISSELMAN, DECEASED.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: March 5, 2013

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02595-RPM

CHRISTINE DOCKSEY and James H. Chalat

ROSS DOCKSEY, Russell R. Hatten

Steve McWhirter

Plaintiffs,

v.

TAYLOR JANDA, Karen R. Wasson

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Trial Preparation Conference

10:55 a.m. Court in session.

Discussion regarding witnesses that will testify by videotape deposition.

Counsel state only witnesses by videotape are Dr. Brian Donahue and Dr. Luz Feldman.

Counsel agree, if called, Janice Todd will testify by read deposition.

Discussion regarding objections to exhibits.

Court states it will rule on the objections to the video depositions designations by indicating “O” for

overruled and “S” for sustained on the combined objection lists submitted.

ORDERED: Motion to Strike Untimely Disclosed Medical Records and Medical Bills for

Christine Docksey [30], is denied, as stated on record.

Ms. Wasson informs the Court that defendant will be present at trial with her mother and father.

Discussion regarding jury instructions (damages).

Mr. Chalat submits a copy of a recent Colorado Court of Appeals opinion regarding apportionment with

respect to a pre-existing condition.

Mr. Chalat agrees to permit defendant to call Dr. Messenbaugh out of order.

Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

March 5, 2013

11-cv-02595-RPM

Further discussion regarding jury instructions (statutory).

ORDERED: Proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions and joint statement of the case are to

be submitted on March 7, 2013.

Court informs counsel of its advisement to jurors regarding social media.

Discussion regarding verdict form.

Court states its practice regarding verdict forms.

Discussion regarding case facts (skiing /boarding elevation).

Discussion regarding admissibility of statements.

Court states its preliminary view regarding the admissibility of statements between defendant and claims

representative/adjuster and between Mr. Docksey and the Segaloffs pre-litigation.

11:35 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 40 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD JACKSON.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION**




The
      undersigned, Michael Mak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, A#2, for the period ended December
      31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                April 10, 2007
            
            /s/ Michael
                MakMichael
                Mak, Chief Executive Officer
#### James PRYOR v. STATE.

7 Div. 115.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

BEICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### RAYMOND GERALD v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification granted. (See 201 *N.J.Super.*438)
#### Julia D. KIRK, Widow, et al., Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 18, 1973.

Charles J. Kamuf, Owensboro, Truett DeMoisey, Walton, for appellants.

Carl T. Miller, Gen. Counsel, Dept, of Highways, Frankfort, Joseph R. Flaherty, Owensboro, for appellee.

STEINFELD, Justice.

For highway purposes the Commonwealth condemned 4.19 acres from a 38.70 acre tract owned by appellants. The jury found that the before-taking value was $39,000 and the after-taking value was $29,000. From a judgment awarding the owners $10,000, they have appealed claiming only that the trial court erred in allowing, over their objection, testimony that the remaining land was sold for $29,000 fifty days after the taking date.

The proof showed that the sale was at “arm’s length”, although the purchasers bought the property in order to acquire the dirt. The two valuation experts who testified for the Commonwealth each fixed the after-taking value at $29,000. Two witnesses for the owners testified that the after-taking value was $29,000 and one said it was $28,750.

Prior to the trial the court ruled that it would permit the price at which the property sold to he introduced in evidence but would allow the landowners to explain why they accepted that amount of money for the property. That explanation was made, but the landowners say that the admission of the evidence of the sale price forced its witnesses to fix $29,000 as the after value. They had an opportunity to explain to the jury all factors properly used in making their evaluation.

“Where the value of the property is material, any competent evidence which will aid the jury in fixing the fair market value is admissible.” 30 C.J.S. Eminent Domain § 430, p. 565. It is our opinion that the price received in the sale, which took place so soon after the taking date, was evidence of aid to the jury. Cf. Commonwealth, Dept. of Highways v. Whitledge, Ky., 406 S.W.2d 833 (1966).

The judgment is affirmed.

PALMORE, C. J., and MILLIKEN, OSBORNE, REED, STEINFELD and STEPHENSON, JJ., sitting.

All concur.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2075 

To prohibit a reduction in funding for the defense commissary system in 

fiscal year 2015 pending the report of the Military Compensation and 

Retirement Modernization Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2014 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit a reduction in funding for the defense commissary system in fiscal year 2015 pending the report 

of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Commissary 

5 Sustainment Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2075 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REDUCTION IN FUNDING FOR THE 

2 DEFENSE COMMISSARY SYSTEM IN FISCAL 

3 YEAR 2015 PENDING THE REPORT OF THE 

4 MILITARY COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT 

5 MODERNIZATION COMMISSION. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

7 monthly amount of funds made available by the Depart8 ment of Defense for the defense commissary system dur9 ing fiscal year 2015 may not be reduced below the average 

10 monthly amount of funds made available for that system 

11 during fiscal year 2014 until the date of the report of the 

12 Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization 

13 Commission under section 674(f) of the National Defense 

14 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

15 239; 126 Stat. 1792). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: RENEE CUELLAR, DIRECTLY

AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF

3 LEGENDARY TIGERS, LLC D/B/A

TIPSY TIGER AND D/B/A EPTX,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-19-00035-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC 

d/b/a Tipsy Tiger and d/b/a EPTX, has filed a mandamus petition against the Honorable Francisco 

X. Dominguez, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Cuellar is challenging

Respondent’s order granting a motion filed by the Receiver, Robert Sandoval, requesting the return 

of certain funds. Cuellar also filed a motion to stay the underlying proceedings. The motion for 

emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus are denied. 

Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to 

compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by 

appeal. In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011)(orig. proceeding); In re Prudential 

Insurance Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004)(orig. proceeding). The 

burden is on relator to show it is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company, 165 

S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005)(orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 
- 2 -

1992)(orig. proceeding). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that 

Relator has failed to show that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the

motion for emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus.

January 30, 2019

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ERIC JACKSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF FLORENCE JACKSON, DECEASED,

Petitioner

v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND FAIRMOUNT LONG TERM CARE,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 440 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 11, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”) Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Harmonic Inc., Santa Clara, CA, MAGIX AG, Berlin, Germany; Red Bee Media Limited, London, United Kingdom, SeaChange International, Acton, MA; and Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara, CA, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, JW Hannay Co., Ltd., Glasgow, United Kingdom, has withdrawn as a party to venture.                

                    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned                           ( print page 63021)                        activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.                

                    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 27, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 31, 2008 (73 FR 44773).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

 [FR Doc. E8-24286 Filed 10-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5289-5290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Ultratrace 
Detection, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Ultratrace Detection, LLC a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license to practice the field of use of a Pre-concentrator 
Device for sampling, collecting, analyzing, and detecting chemicals, 
warfare agents, or drugs in the United States, the Government-owned 
inventions described in U.S. Patent Application No. 11/542,453 entitled 
``Micro Scale Flow Through Sorbent Plate Collection Device'', Navy Case 
No. 100,203 and U.S. Patent Application No. 12/406,756 entitled 
``Actively Cooled Vapor

[[Page 5290]]

Preconcentrator'', Navy Case No. 99,832 and any continuations, 
divisionals or re-issues thereof. The inventions are jointly owned with 
the University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. and the 
University of Louisville will jointly execute the license.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than February 17, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Research 
Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-
5320.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Manak, Head, Technology Transfer 
Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-
5320, telephone 202-767-3083. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please fax 
202-404-7920, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96e4ffe2f7b8fbf7f8f7fdd6f8e4fab8f8f7e0efb8fbfffa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6d4cfd2c788cbc7c8c7cde6c8d4ca88c8c7d0df88cbcfca">[email protected]</span></a> or use courier delivery 
to expedite response.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.

    Dated: January 26, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-2119 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50900

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTHONY DAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CR-35-2

-------------------- April 4, 2000 Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Anthony Dailey appeals the district court’s denial of the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Carr , 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992). Dailey’s notice of appeal was filed more than ten days after the district court denied the motion and is thus untimely. Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(b). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and it is DISMISSED.
----

**Exhibit 23.2**

|   | **GeothermEx, Inc.**
3260    BLUME DR., SUITE 220    RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA 94806TELEPHONE: (510) 527-9876    FAX: (510) 527- 8164    E-MAIL: mw@geothermex.com  
**Consent of GeothermEx Inc.**

In connection with U.S. Geothermal Inc'sregistration statement on Form 10K, S-3, S-8 and related filings under theUnited States Securities Act of 1933, I, Subir Sanyal, on behalf of GeothermExInc. ("GeothermEx"), hereby consent to the use of GeothermEx's name and to theuse of the "Technical Report On The Taft River Geothermal Resource, CassiaCounty Idaho" dated August 2002, and the "Results From The short-Term WellTesting Program At the Raft River Geothermal Field, Cassia County, Idaho" datedOctober 2004 (together with the "Technical Reports", references to the TechnicalReports, or portions thereof, or information derived from the Technical Reports,in the Registration Statement. 

Dated at Richmond, California, this 10thday of August, 2009.

/s/ Subir K. Sanyal                             Name: Subir K.SanyalTitle: President |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|