IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT

BRUCE W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARK KELLAR, Individually and in his official capacity as the Health Service Administrator

at FCI-Florence;

LISA MCDERMOTT, Individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Health Services

Adminstrator at FCI-Florence;

PETER BLUDWORTH, Individually and in his official capacity as Associate Warden at FCIFlorence;

MIKE GOODIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Pharmacist at FCI-Florence;

DR. DAVID ALLRED, Individually and in his official capacity as Clinical Director of FCIFlorence;

DR. GEORGE SANTINI, Individually and in his official capacity as Staff Physician at FCIFlorence;

CARI RITTER, Individually and in her official capacity as Mid-Level Provder at FCI-Florence;

MRS. A. VINYARD, Individually and in her official capacity as Physician Assistant at FCIFlorence;

GILBERTA TRUJILLO, Individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of Medical at

FCI-Florence;

MR. GRIFFIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Correctional Officer at FCI-Florence;

JOHN DOE, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Health Programs at North Central

Region, Leavenworth, Kansas; and

DR. JAMES PELTON, Individually and in his official capacity as Region Medical Director at

North Central Region, Leavenworth, Kansas,

Defendants.

 

TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER 

-CIVIL

 

This Order sets deadlines, imposes requirements that supplement the Scheduling Order

and imposes trial preparation requirements.

A. Applicable Rules 

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
This proceeding is subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of

Evidence, the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of

Colorado and the MSK Civ. Practice Standards. A copy of the Practice Standards is available

from the Clerk’s office or can be downloaded from the Court’s website at 

http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx under Judicial Officers' Procedures. Parties who are

not represented by counsel (pro se) are responsible for knowledge of and compliance with all

applicable rules and provisions of this Order. References in this Order to “counsel” apply to

parties appearing pro se. 

If a party to this case is incarcerated, it is the responsibility of that party to provide a copy

of this Order and all other orders issued in this case to his or her Case Manager. For purposes of

attending a scheduled hearing by telephone, the Case Manager should contact the Courtroom

Deputy Clerk, Patricia Glover at (303)335-2185 at least two business days prior to the hearing to

make the necessary arrangements for the inmate to participate. 

B. Dispositive and Rule 702 Motions

The deadline in the Scheduling Order for the filing of dispositive motions shall also be

the deadline for parties to file motions challenging the foundational requirements of opinion

testimony under Fed. R. Evid. 702. If the dispositive motion deadline is changed, the Rule 702

motion deadline automatically changes to match it. 

The format for dispositive motions is set out in MSK Civ. Practice Standard V.H, found

at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx under Judicial Officers' Procedures. The format for

Rule 702 motions is found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx under Judicial Officers'

Procedures. Failure to use the appropriate format may result in a delayed ruling on the motion. 

If determination of a Rule 702 motion is required for determination of a dispositive motion,

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
please so state in the title of the Rule 702 motion.

Requests for modification of deadlines set by the Scheduling Order will be referred

to the Magistrate Judge for resolution. However, any request to extend the dispositive

motion deadline more than 30 days beyond the deadline originally set in the initial

Scheduling Order must show exceptional circumstances warranting the extension. 

 If the dispositive motion deadline passes without dispositive motions being filed, the

parties shall contact Chambers within 10 days of the dispositive motion deadline to request the

setting of a Final Pretrial Conference. Failure to contact Chambers within this time may result in

the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

C. Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Setting

The Court will not set a Final Pretrial Conference at this time. A Final Pretrial

Conference will be scheduled once dispositive motions are determined, or upon the request of

the parties should no dispositive motions be filed. 

The Court will set a date for trial at the conclusion of the Final Pretrial Conference. It is

the Court’s intention that the trial date will be as soon as 30 days after the Final Pretrial

Conference, or as quickly thereafter as the Court’s calendar makes possible. The parties should

be prepared to advise the Court as to the minimum number of days needed for trial. 

 Trial counsel shall appear at the Final Pretrial Conference and shall be prepared to

address their own availability and the availability of necessary witnesses. If two or more counsel

represent one party, please be prepared to proceed with one counsel if the other has a conflict, or

to explain why the available counsel cannot proceed alone. All parties to the action shall be

physically present at the Final Pretrial Conference; failure of a party to appear will result in a

order that that party obtain a full, expedited transcript of the Conference at that party’s expense. 

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
Where a party is an organization, the client representative who will appear at trial on behalf of

that organization shall be present. 

Jury trials usually begin on Monday afternoons at 1:00 p.m. and bench trials usually

begin on Tuesday mornings at 9:00 a.m. With approximately six hours available per trial day, 

one week jury trials usually allow for 22 hours of in-court time, which includes presentation of

evidence, opening and closing statements, and argument on evidentiary objections and trial

motions. (This calculation excludes time for jury selection, charging conference and initial and

concluding instructions for the jury.) One week bench trials usually allow for 24 hours for

presentation of all evidence, opening and closing statements, objections, and arguments. Absent

objections made at the Final Pre-Trial Conference, a chess clock will be used to divide trial time

equally between Plaintiff(s) and Defendant(s). Parties can use their time as they choose, and are

free to restructure time between themselves.

Any problems in the trial setting or special needs for witness scheduling should be

addressed at the Final Pretrial Conference. Designated witnesses should be available during the

entire trial period. Their unavailability may not constitute a basis for delay in or continuance of

the trial. Counsel should always have a sufficient number of witnesses available to testify such

that recesses or early adjournments of the trial day will not be necessary. If witnesses are not

available, lost time may be counted against the party whose case is being presented.

At the time fixed for trial, all parties shall be present and ready to proceed. If any party is

absent or unprepared to proceed, judgment may be entered forthwith in favor of the opposing

party or the time of unavailability credited against the party’s share of the trial time. If both

parties are absent or unprepared, the case may be dismissed, and costs, fees, or sanctions may be

imposed against either or both parties and/or their counsel. 

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
D. Proposed Final Pretrial Order

Counsel shall meet and confer sufficiently in advance of the Final Pretrial Conference to

jointly prepare a Proposed Final Pretrial Order. The parties shall file the Proposed Final Pretrial

Order, proposed jury instructions, and proposed voir dire questions at least 7 days before the

conference.

Except as follows, parties should use the format of Appendix G of this Court’s Local

Civil Rules for the Proposed Pretrial Order, available at the Court’s website. See

http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx (Forms). 

Please make the following modifications: 

Section 3: Claims and Defenses – (Parties are encouraged to omit a narrative summary

of the claims, defenses, facts, and legal theories. If a party includes a narrative summary, such

summary should not exceed one page in length.) 

Separately enumerate each claim and affirmative defense (i.e. a defense on which the

Defendant bears the burden of proof) to be tried. For each claim and affirmative defense for

which a party has the burden of proof, such party shall designate:

1) the party that has the burden of proof;

2) the standard of proof;

3) if the claim is governed by state law, the state whose law controls the claim; and

4) each element that must be proved. For each element, state whether the necessary facts

are stipulated. If not, the party with the burden of proof shall, separately for each

element, state the particular fact(s) it intends to prove to satisfy that element. For each

fact, list the witness or exhibit that will establish that fact. An example is attached to this

Order. Any claims or affirmative defenses not specifically identified may be deemed

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
1

FED.R.CIV.P. 11(b)(4) provides guidance as to when a matter is in dispute.

waived. 

Section 4: Stipulations - One of the purposes of a trial is to determine the facts upon

which the parties cannot agree. However, it is not necessary to present evidence of facts which

are not it dispute. Indeed, it saves the parties time and expense and focuses the trial when parties

identify relevant facts that are not disputed. 1 To assist the jury in understanding the opening

statement and in considering the evidence, such stipulated facts will be included in a jury

instruction given to the jury prior to opening statements. 

Please be cognizant of the difference between disputing the existence of a fact and

disputing the significance of that fact. For example, a stipulation to the existence of fact (e.g.

that the sun set at 7:00 p.m. on the day in question) does not prevent the party from arguing as to

the significance of that fact (e.g. that there was or was not adequate daylight at 7:00 p.m.). 

Section 5: Pending motions – In addition to the information required in Appendix G, 

identify all motions either party anticipates making prior to trial, including the specific relief to

be requested. 

Section 6: Witnesses – In lieu of the designations required in Appendix G, the parties

should attach a single, joint list of all witnesses. The form is found at:

http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx. Please designate the total time needed for the

testimony of each witness (or the time necessary to present deposition testimony). It does not

matter what type of examination will be used to elicit the testimony, nor who will call the

witness. The time calculation is not a limitation on the amount of time that a witness may be

examined at trial; parties may allocate their allotted trial time as they see fit. The estimated

duration of testimony in the Witness List is used solely to ensure that the time set aside for trial

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
is sufficient to receive the testimony of all expected witnesses. 

Section 7: Exhibits – Exhibits should be listed on a single, joint exhibit list using the

form available at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx. Exhibits should be numbered

without designation as Plaintiff’s or Defendant’s exhibits. Parties may use the same exhibit

numbers as used in pretrial discovery. The provisions of subsection (b) of Appendix G regarding

the filing of objections to exhibits are waived. All objections are reserved for trial. 

 Hard copies of the exhibits to be used at trial should be put in two notebooks (original

for the witness; copy for the Court). Please only put exhibits you are certain to admit in the

notebooks; exhibits that you might use ( such as those anticipated for impeachment or rebuttal)

can be added to the notebooks during the trial if they are admitted. Exhibit notebooks shall be

given to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk on the first day of trial.

E. Modification of Order

This Order may not be modified by agreement of the parties. However, upon timely,

written application, any party may seek modification as may be necessary to meet a bona fide

emergency, to avoid irreparable injury or harm, or as may otherwise be necessary to do

substantial justice. Extensions of time and continuances will not normally be granted for “press

of other business” or for circumstances that could reasonably have been anticipated.

Failure to comply with the provisions of this Order or the applicable procedural

rules may result in imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, vacation of the

trial, barring the presentation of evidence, dismissal of claims or defenses, entry of default

or awards of fees and costs in accordance with FED.R.CIV.P. 16 and 37.

DATED this 11th day of July, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
Attachment to Trial Preparation Order

Example:

Claim 1: Breach of contract under Colorado law

Plaintiff has burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence

Elements: (1)-(3) offer, acceptance, consideration

(a) the parties stipulate that these elements are satisfied

(4) performance by the plaintiff

(a) On March 3, 2004, Peter Plaintiff delivered one crate of

widgets to Widget Packers, Inc. (Testimony of Peter Plaintiff;

Don Defendant; Exhibits 1, 4)

(b) The widgets conformed to the specifications in the contract. 

(Testimony of Peter Plaintiff; Exhibit 2)

(c) The widgets were delivered on the date set by the contract.

(Exhibit 2)

(5) non-performance by the defendant

(a) Widget Packers, Inc. failed to remit payment on the terms set

by the contract. (Testimony of Barry Bookkeeper; Exhibit 2)

(b) Peter Plaintiff has made several written demands for payment. 

(Peter Plaintiff; Exhibits 3, 5, 7)

(6) damages

(a) Peter Plaintiff has been damaged in the contract amount

of $10,000. (Testimony of Peter Plaintiff; Exhibit 2).

Claim 2: Unjust Enrichment under Colorado law

Plaintiff has burden of proof on all elements by a preponderance of the evidence

Elements: (1) Defendant has received a benefit

(a) On March 3, 2004, Peter Plaintiff delivered one crate of

widgets to Widget Packers, Inc. pursuant to a contractual

agreement. (Testimony of Peter Plaintiff; Don Defendant; Exhibits

1, 2, 4).

(2) the benefit is at the Plaintiff’s expense

(a) Widget Packers, Inc. failed to remit payment on the terms set

by the contract. (Testimony of Barry Bookkeeper, Exhibit 2)

(3) justice requires that Defendant reimburse the Plaintiff for the

benefit received

(a) The widgets have a market value of $15,000. (Testimony of

Peter Plaintiff)

(b) Don Defendant is in breach of the contract. (Testimony of

Peter Plaintiff)

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
Affirmative Defense to Claim 2: Failure to mitigate under Colorado law

Defendant has burden of proof on all elements by a preponderance of the

evidence

Elements: (1) Plaintiff had a reasonable opportunity to avoid injury

(a) On March 5, 2004, Don Defendant left a message on

Peter Plaintiff’s voice mail offering to return the crate of

widgets unopened. (Testimony of Don Defendant; Peter

Plaintiff)

(b) On March 8, 2004, Don Defendant wrote to Peter

Plaintiff, offering to assign the contract for the purchase of

widgets to WidgetCo. (Don Defendant; Warren Widget;

Exhibit 6)

(2) Plaintiff unreasonably failed to avail itself of opportunities

to avoid injury

(a) Peter Plaintiff did not respond to the March 5, 2004

message. (Don Defendant)

(b) Peter Plaintiff did not respond to the March 8, 2004

letter. (Don Defendant)

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 71 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10