alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of First
National Master Note Trust (the "Trust") for the year ended December 31, 2004,
I, Matthew W. Lawver, President of First National Funding Corporation as
managing member of First National Funding LLC as transferor and co-registrant,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust.

Dated: March 30, 2005          FIRST NATIONAL MASTER NOTE TRUST

                               By: First National Funding LLC, as Transferor and
                                   Co-Registrant

                               By: First National Funding Corporation,
                                   Managing Member

                               By: /s/ Matthew W. Lawver
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Matthew W. Lawver, President

                                       20
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00212-CV 

Charles Fred Meshell 

v. 

Katherine Antoinette Lippi 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 415th District Court 

of Parker County (CV14-1368) 

May 12, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

 It is further ordered that Appellant Charles Fred Meshell shall pay all of the 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 20, 2011    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Stephen J. Sperco   |   |
| Stephen J. Sperco       |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 5.1

                       WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
                           Professional Corporation
                   8911 CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY, SUITE 3350
                              AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
               TELEPHONE: 512-338-5400   FACSIMILE 512-338-5499
                                 WWW.WSGR.COM
                                  May 4, 2000


Microtune, Inc.
2540 East Plano Parkway, Suite 188
Plano, Texas 75074

     RE: REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-1 to be filed by you
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2000 (the "Registration
Statement") in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, of up to $57,500,000 worth of common stock (including shares
issuable upon exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option) of Microtune,
Inc. (the "Shares"). As your counsel in connection with this transaction, we
have examined the proceedings proposed to be taken in connection with such sale
and issuance of the Shares.

     It is our opinion that, upon completion of the proceedings being taken or
contemplated by us, as your counsel, to be taken prior to the issuance of the
Shares, the Shares when issued and sold in the manner referred to in the
Registration Statement will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

     We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the
Registration Statement, including the prospectus constituting a part thereof,
and any amendment thereto.

                              Very truly yours,

                              WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI
                              Professional Corporation
                              /s/   Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEROY BLACK.

September 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
                         -----------------------------

We consent to the use in the Form S-4 Registration Statement and Prospectus of
Aviation Group, Inc. of our reports dated September 11, 1999 and April 19, 2000,
respectively, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Aviation
Group, Inc. and the financial statements of Epoch Technology, Inc. contained in
such Registration Statement, and to the use of our name and the statements with
respect to us, as appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.


/s/  Hein + Associates LLP

Hein + Associates LLP
Certified Public Accountants

October 26, 2000
Dallas, Texas
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of P2 Solar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Raj-Mohinder S. GurmChief Executive Officer Date: July 14, 2010
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1220 

To increase the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile for business, 

medical, and moving deduction purposes for 2007 and permanently increase such rate for charitable deduction purposes under the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 and to temporarily increase the reimbursement 

rate for use of an automobile by Federal employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To increase the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile for business, medical, and moving deduction purposes for 2007 and permanently increase such rate for 

charitable deduction purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to temporarily increase the reimbursement rate for use of an automobile by Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reimbursing Our 

5 American Drivers (ROAD) Act of 2007’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1220 IS

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MILEAGE RATE DEDUC2 TION. 

3 (a) RATE FOR BUSINESS, MEDICAL, AND MOVING

4 USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE.—For purposes of sections 

5 162(a), 213(d)(1)(B), and 217 of the Internal Revenue 

6 Code of 1986, the standard mileage rate for use of an 

7 automobile shall be 60 cents per mile for any use after 

8 December 31, 2006, and before January 1, 2008. 

9 (b) RATE FOR CHARITABLE USE OF AN AUTO10 MOBILE.—Section 170(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

11 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘14 cents’’ and inserting ‘‘30 

12 cents’’. 

13 SEC. 3. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN REIMBURSEMENT RATE 

14 FOR USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE FOR FEDERAL 

15 EMPLOYEES. 

16 For purposes of section 5704 of title 5, United States 

17 Code, the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile 

18 for an employee who is engaged on official business for 

19 the Government shall be 60 cents per mile for any use 

20 after December 31, 2006, and before January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2154 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Emergency Medical Services for Children Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2154 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical 

3 Services for Children Reauthorization Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

5 Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 300w–9(d)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and $30,387,656’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘$30,387,656’’; and 

9 (2) by inserting before the period ‘‘, and 

10 $20,213,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 

11 2019’’. 

Passed the Senate September 10, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2154 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reaudren Program. thorize the Emergency Medical Services for Chil-
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 8, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.111 Foreign Banking Offices in U.S. 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1347

In Re: JOHN D. HORTON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(MC-04-13)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Horton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John D. Horton petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for

expungement of records. He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act. Although we find that

mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not

unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to

the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does

not act expeditiously. We grant Horton’s motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Charles Edward FRANKLIN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 34811.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Two.

Oct. 16, 1973.

Armstrong, Teasdale, Kramer & Vaughan, Larry B. Luber, St. Louis, for mov-ant-appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Gene E. Voigts, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, James Darst, Asst. Circuit Atty., St. Louis, for respondent.

McMillian, judge.

This is an appeal from an Order overruling an Amended Motion to withdraw two pleas of guilty, Rule 27.25, V.A.M.R., and to vacate judgment and sentence entered thereon, Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., following an evidentiary hearing before the trial court.

Movant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree with a dangerous and deadly weapon, and to murder in the second de*69gree on 30 January 1969. Thereafter, the court sentenced movant to two concurrent sentences of 15 years each in the custody of the Department of Corrections.

Movant’s Amended Motion alleged that (1) the court erred in denying his writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, and (2) the court erred in overruling his motion because assigned counsel ineffectively represented him at the time his pleas of guilty were entered. At the evidentiary hearing movant candidly testified that at the time of his pleas he acknowledged his guilt, that both pleas were made voluntarily, and that he received neither promises nor threats as an inducement for either plea. He further testified that at the time his pleas were entered he knew that the prosecutors would recommend the concurrent fifteen year sentences.

Movant filed a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to have the custodian of the Department of Corrections to produce Kenneth Rayford. He claimed that Ray-ford would testify that on the day of the robbery and murder, he, movant, was in Kansas City, Missouri. He also claimed that prior to the entry of his pleas of guilty he had given the name of Rayford to his attorney. After the hearing the court made extensive findings of facts. It found that the Public Defender’s office not only adequately represented movant, but also that movant never gave the name of Rayford or any other witnesses to his attorney. The trial court concluded that movant failed to sustain the burden of proof necessary to entitle him to any affirmative relief, State v. Brown, 449 S.W. 2d 664 (Mo.1970), and quite properly denied movant’s petition.

We have examined the transcript of the evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., and believe that (1) this case has no precedential value and (2) there is evidence to support the findings and conclusion of the trial court and they are clearly not erroneous, Rule 27.26(j), V.A. M.R.

The judgment is affirmed.

SMITH, P. J., and CLEMENS, J., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-152-178; 333-115833; 333-89642 and 333-89640 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-139908, 333-147877 and 333-148640 on Form S-3 of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiary of our report datedMarch 16, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiary, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report is incorporated by reference in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

Oak Brook, Illinois 

March 16, 2009
EXHIBIT
          32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BLUEGATE CORPORATION PURSUANT
          TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C.
          63.
 
 I,
          Stephen J. Sperco, the Chief Executive Officer of Bluegate Corporation, hereby
          certify that Bluegate Corporation 's periodic report on Form 10-QSB, for the
          period ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information
          contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
          of Bluegate
          Corporation.


Date:
                  August 23, 2007
              /s/
              Stephen
                  J. SpercoStephen
                  J. SpercoChief
                  Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John S. Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Sybase, Inc.

| |  |                                                                  
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ JOHN S. CHEN                                             
| |  |                                                                  
| |  | Name: John S. Chen
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President

I, Pieter A. Van der Vorst, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Sybase, Inc.

| |  |                                                                                                     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORST                                                                     
| |  |                                                                                                     
| |  | Name: Pieter A. Van der Vorst
Title:   Senior Vice President and
            Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 4020F.
    Name: Southern Cross Shipping, Inc.
    Address: 6440 NW 2nd Street, Miami, FL 33126.
    Date Revoked: August 4, 2010.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 002148N.
    Name: Jagremar Marine, Inc.
    Address: 15600 Morales Road, Houston, TX 77032.
    Date Revoked: August 4, 2010.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-21158 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Date,Total,Households,Business,State and local govts.,Federal
1999,6.4,8.4,10.7,3.3,-1.9
2000,5.0,9.1,9.3,1.4,-8.0
2001,6.3,9.6,5.8,8.8,-0.2
2002,7.3,10.8,2.6,11.1,7.6
2003,8.1,11.7,2.3,8.3,10.9
2004,8.9,11.1,6.3,7.4,9.0
2005,9.5,11.1,8.8,10.2,7.0
2006,9.0,10.0,10.5,8.2,3.9
2007,8.7,6.7,13.4,9.3,4.9
2008,5.9,0.3,5.2,2.0,24.2
2008Q1,5.5,3.1,7.8,3.6,8.1
2008Q2,3.3,0.2,6.4,1.1,5.9
2008Q3,8.2,-0.4,5.2,3.3,39.2
2008Q4,6.1,-1.8,1.0,-0.2,37.0
2009Q1,4.3,-1.2,0.5,4.4,22.6
2008Q2,4.5,-1.6,-2.2,3.6,28.2
2008Q3,2.8,-2.6,-2.6,5.1,20.6
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 10, 2010*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.124 Government-Sponsored Enterprises1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILFREDO RODRIGUEZ.

September 5, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification denied, (see 202 *N.J.Super.*233)
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2111 

To reauthorize the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2014 

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yuma Crossing Na5 tional Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF YUMA CROSSING NATIONAL 

7 HERITAGE AREA. 

8 Section 7 of the Yuma Crossing National Heritage 

9 Area Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106– 

10 319; 114 Stat. 1284) is amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1922 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1922

    To apply basic contracting laws to the Transportation Security 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2007

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To apply basic contracting laws to the Transportation Security 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Acquisition Reform Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 114 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by repealing subsection (o).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.51


                                 CONTRACT EXTENSION


This is to confirm the closing date for closing the acquisition contract
between ColorSmart.com, Inc., and Magnum Digital Services, has hereby been
extended until such time as ColorSmart completes its IPO. It is our
understanding that ColorSmart.com has filed its SB2 registration with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and completion of the IPO should be
conducted on or about May 15, 2000. We hereby consent to the extension as
stated.



/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
-------------------------------------
Seller's Signature



-------------------------------------
Seller's Signature


Date: 4/5/00
-------------------------------------