alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         685,828
<SECURITIES>                                 1,509,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                  601,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,016,756
<PP&E>                                       1,803,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                 971,742
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,213,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,244,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,587
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,846,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,213,885
<SALES>                                      9,446,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,529,497
<CGS>                                        6,024,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,116,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                361,803
<INCOME-TAX>                                   176,801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .051
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .049
        

</TABLE>
#### JUDY COLEMAN v. CYCLE TRANSFORMER CORPORATION.

January 23, 1986.

Petition for certification granted.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Aurelia Energy N.V. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugo Heerema, Managing Director of Bluewater Holding B.V., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|Dated: April 15, 2003 |  | By: | /s/HUGO HEEREMAHugo Heerema Managing Director
Bluewater Holding B.V.
|--------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PEDRO SAUBERER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1290

[ August 19, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Daliah H. Weiss

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502009CF009171

.

Pedro Sauberer, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and K LINGENSM ITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The New York Central Rd. Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio et al.

(No. 25660

Decided March 18, 1936.)

*551
      *Mr. W. N. King*and *Mr. G. T. Lewis, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. Bricher,*attorney general, and *Mr. Donald G. Power,*for defendant in error, the Public Utilities Commission.

*Mr. James W. Huffman,*for defendants in error, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al.

*552Stephenson, J.

In this opinion the plaintiff in error will be referred to as the railroad company and the defendant in error as the commission.

The power and jurisdiction of the commission is delegated by Section 614-3, General Code:

“The public utilities commission of Ohio is hereby vested with the power and jurisdiction to supervise and regulate ‘public utilities’ and ‘railroads’ as herein defined and provided and to require all public utilities to furnish their products and render all services exacted by the commission, or by law, and also to promulgate and enforce all orders relating to the protection, welfare and safety of railroad employees and the traveling public.”

It must be conceded that under the authority granted by this section the commission had plenary power to make the order complained of, providing, of course, there was evidence to support the findings upon which the order was based.

An examination of the record in this case reveals substantial evidence to support the findings of the commission.

This court will not substitute its judgment for that of the commission, and will disturb its findings only when they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. In view of the evidence, the order made by the commission was neither unlawful nor unreasonable, as there was an element of danger in placing the pusher engine behind occupied cabooses. Such danger is detailed in the testimony to the effect that the engine in the rear caused the caboose in front to buckle.

The expense in money and time will not be considered, when such expenditure is being made in the interest of safety to life and limb.

The order of the commission applies only to pusher engines within the state of Ohio and in no wise interferes with interstate commerce.

The cases of *Penna. Rd. Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*109 Ohio St., 69, 141 N. E., 839, and *New Torh*
      *553
      *Central Rd. Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*123 Ohio St., 370, 175 N. E., 596, dispose of this contention.

The railroad company was not denied dne process of law. It had its day in conrt. We find no error in the findings and order of the commission in this proceeding, and its order is affirmed.

*Order affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR REVIEW OF OPINION NO. 569 OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for review of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion Number 569 entitled, *Conflict of*Interest— *Former Deputy Attorney General Representing Licensee Before Professional Board For Which He Formerly Served,*is granted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE NACACIO AMU,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. James C. Cacheris,

Senior District Judge. (CR-97-40; CA-03-601)

Submitted: September 9, 2004 Decided: September 16, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Nacacio Amu, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Marie Hoefling,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jose Nacacio Amu seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his

motion to amend his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Amu seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Amu’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,619]


Chrysler, LLC; Twinsburg Stamping Plant, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC, Wackenhut 
Security, CR Associates, and Syncreon, Twinsburg, OH; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on February 4, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping Plant, Twinsburg, Ohio. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74 FR 9282). 
The certification was amended on June 29, 2009 and August 28, 2009 to 
include on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities 
Management LLC, Wackenhut Security, and CR Associates. The notices were 
published in the Federal Register on July 14, 2009 (74 FR 34042) and 
September 22, 2009 (74 FR 48297-48298), respectively.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of metal automotive stampings, a substantial 
proportion of which are shipped to an affiliated plant where they are 
used in the assembly of automotive vehicles.
    New information shows that workers leased from Syncreon were 
employed on-site at the Twinsburg, Ohio location of Chrysler, LLC, 
Twinsburg Stamping Plant. The Department has determined that these 
workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be 
considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is 
amending this certification to include workers leased from Syncreon 
working on-site at the Twinsburg, Ohio location of Chrysler, LLC, 
Twinsburg Stamping Plant.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,619 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping Plant, 
including on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities 
Management LLC, Wackenhut Security, CR Associates, and Syncreon, 
Twinsburg, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after December 2, 2007, through February 4, 2011, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-21395 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James Briscoe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Star Gold Corp., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Liberty Star Gold Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 17, 2006

 

/s/ James Briscoe 

James Briscoe

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 229 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 229

 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the 
 ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

 Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the 
 ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The medical center of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans 
Affairs Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans 
Affairs Medical Center.
                                 <all>
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2228 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to consider projects involving rural communities in the selection of alternative water source 

projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2014 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to direct 

the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to consider projects involving rural communities in 

the selection of alternative water source projects, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Water En5 hancement Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2228 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVE WATER SOURCE PROJECTS. 

2 Section 220 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

3 Act (33 U.S.C. 1300) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(4) PARTICIPATION OF RURAL COMMU7 NITIES.—In making grants under this section, the 

8 Administrator shall consider whether the project— 

9 ‘‘(A) is located in an unincorporated rural 

10 community; 

11 ‘‘(B) is located in an area that— 

12 ‘‘(i) is served by a public water system 

13 with fewer than 3,000 connections; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) does not have a public water sys15 tem; 

16 ‘‘(C) is located in an agricultural area with 

17 rural residences served by a public water sys18 tem or by private wells; or 

19 ‘‘(D) is not only a benefit to the rural com20 munity served by the project, but also a benefit 

21 to additional regional partners.’’; 

22 (2) in subsection (i)(1)— 

23 (A) in the first sentence— 

24 (i) by striking ‘‘wastewater or’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘wastewater,’’; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2228 IS

1 (ii) by inserting before the period at 

2 the end the following: ‘‘, or through con3 junctively managing groundwater supplies 

4 by delivering surface water instead of 

5 groundwater’’; and 

6 (B) in the second sentence by inserting 

7 ‘‘unless the project requires those facilities to 

8 deliver the alternative water supply’’ before the 

9 period; and 

10 (3) in subsection (j), in the first sentence, by 

11 striking ‘‘2004’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventures-National Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.

Dated:  January 16, 2003            By:     /s/ Louis J. George
                                          -------------------------------------
                                            Louis J. George, President and Chief
                                            Executive Officer and Interim Chief
                                            Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  of  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Crescent  Communications, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.C.  63.
----------

I,  Mike McDonald, the Chief Financial Officer of Crescent Communications, Inc.,
hereby  certify  that  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10-QSB,  for  the  period  ending  September  30,  2003, fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and  that  information  contained  in  the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents,  in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations  of  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.



Date: November 14, 2003          /s/ Mike McDonald
                                 -------------------
                                 Mike McDonald,
                                 Chief Financial Officer


                                      II-5
<PAGE>
#### PORCHER v. GLOBE INDEMNITY CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.