alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           53038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1234
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 54761
<PP&E>                                           61212
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  113976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      113406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    113976
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 27121
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18617
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              18617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     18617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    26.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    26.12
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William F. Brusso, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Niagara County,

July 29, 1957.

*JoJm E. Palmer*for petitioner.

*W: Alfred Brim*for Almina S. Larsen.

*William H, Earl*for Odd Fellows Home.

Frank J. Kronenberg, S.

Decedent William F. Brusso was the owner of an account in a Lockport savings bank. Shortly before his death he signed a signature card transferring said account from his sole name into a joint account with himself and Almina S. Larsen, an acquaintance of many years. Subsequent to his death, his administrator instituted this proceeding to have the transfer of the savings account into a joint one set aside, so that said account would be a part of decedent’s estate. The basis of the application is that the transfer was made through fraud and undue influence exercised by the transferee and at a time when decedent lacked competency to know what he was doing.

The circumstances of the transfer distinguish this case from the *Fenelon*case *(Matter of Fenelon,*262 N. Y. 57, 308) in that (.he signature card which was signed by decedent specifically and lucidly stated that it created a joint account with right of survivorship.

*1000The *Creekmore*case *(Matter of Creekmore,*1 N Y 2d 284) holds that the burden of showing fraud and undue influence is on the person attempting to impeach the transfer. Here, such burden was not met, and there is no evidence which would justify the court in finding that the transferee exercised any undue influence or committed any fraud.

The *Creekmore*case *(supra)*seems to indicate that the burden of showing that the transferor was competent and realized what was being done is on the transferee. In this case the burden as to competency was met, the testimony of Dr. Macaluse being very helpful to the transferee.

As to the decedent’s being aware of what he was doing, it appears that he or any other competent person could scarcely fail to see that the card which he was signing opened a joint account. In the *Creekmore*case *(supra)*the evidence showed that the decedent wanted a power of attorney, but certain banks strongly discouraged this proposed *modus operandi,*and the decedent’s funds were transferred into the joint account as a substitute for the use of a power of attorney. There were no such circumstances in the instant case. While it appears there was some discussion between the transferee and a representative of the bank concerning use of the funds to pay medical bills of the then ailing decedent, it was also testified by the same witness that the transferee stated that a purpose of the joint deposit was to benefit the transferee personally.

Under the evidence and the applicable law, this court finds that respondent Almina S. Larsen is entitled to said deposit, and the petition of the administrator with regard thereto is dismissed.
#### Newland, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

(Decided April 25, 1938.)

*105
      *Mr. Nathaniel H. Maxwell*and *Mr. Ervin L. Bramlage,*for appellant.

*Mr. Earl T. Wagner,*for appellee.

Hamilton, J.

This case is here on motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The motion to dismiss presents a novel situation, to say the least.

In the motion it is claimed by the Industrial Commission that the Court of Common Pleas was without jurisdiction to render a judgment in its favor, and, therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to review that judgment.

As the record discloses, the Industrial Commission did not at any time contest the appeal to the Court of Common Pleas on the ground that the plaintiff had no right of appeal, but answered to the merits. The case Was submitted to the trial court on the pleadings and the record taken by the Industrial Commission. The trial court, upon consideration thereof, rendered a judgment against the appellant and in favor of the Industrial Commission, the movant here.

It is true that jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent, but that is not the question here.

The Court of Common Pleas had jurisdiction to hear the claimant on appeal. The question goes to the right of the claimant to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas. If the Industrial Commission had moved to dismiss the appeal, and the court had overruled that motion, the Industrial Commission might have made that question a point of error, but it did not do so. The court, on the motion of the Industrial Commission, heard the case on the merits, on the pleadings and the record, and decided the case in favor *106of the commission. If there was any error in the proceeding, how can the commission now claim any prejudicial error intervened? The claimant appealed from that decision to this court and the only objection of the commission is, in substance, that it did not get its favorable judgment in the manner now suggested to this court, and bases its motion to dismiss this appeal on that ground.

If there was any error in the proceeding in the Common Pleas Court, that error was waived by the commission; and further, it cannot be heard to complain against the judgment in its favor. That judgment affords no ground for a dismissal of the review in this court on the jurisdictional question in the Common Pleas Court, which was not raised in that court.

The motion to dismiss is overruled.

*Motion overruled.*

Ross, P. J., and Matthews, J., concur.
U.S. TRUST MORTGAGE 190 CONGRESS PARK DRIVE
STANLEY MATUSZEWSKI
President
1 SERVICE COMPANY SUITE 100
DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445
TELEPHONE: 561 330-2001
FAX: 561 330-2019/2020
E-MAIL: smatuszewski@ustrust.com

March 27, 2003

Ms. Kristen Driscoll
Citibank, N.A.
111 Wall Street, 14th Floor
New York, NY 10043

RE: Officer's Certificate-Statement as to Compliance

Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities VII, Inc. and U.S. Trust
Mortgage Service Company

Dear Ms. Driscoll:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for U.S. Trust
Mortgage Service Company for the 2002 calendar year. To the best
of our knowledge:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
preceding year and of performance under the Pooling and Servicing
agreement dated as of April 1, 2002 has been made under such
officers' supervision.

(ii) To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such
review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Pooling and Servicing agreement dated April 1, 2002
throughout such year.

Certified by:

/s/ S. Matuszewski
--------------------------
Officer- Stanley Matuszewski
President-U.S. Trust Mortgage Service Company
EXHIBIT 23.1

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-150661), Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-150661), Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-150661), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-153467), Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-153467), Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-153467), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-136998), Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-136998), Form S-3 (Registration 333-140231), Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-140231), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-142411), Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-142411), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-144927), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-146335), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-124290), and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-139091) of our report dated June 11, 2010 on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of  Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. as of March 31, 2009 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the years then ended. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-150661), Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-150661), Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-150661), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-153467), Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-153467), Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-153467), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-136998), Form S-3 (Registration 333-140231), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-142411), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-144927), and Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-146335).











Florham Park, New Jersey


June 11, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 2 TO 4 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                       397
<INVENTORY>                                     38,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,077
<PP&E>                                          66,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,754
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,419
<SALES>                                         59,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,280
<CGS>                                           44,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (153)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                       872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,121
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.20

 

Rider to Agreement M30 — DCF Integrated

 

Rider no.2 to the Agreement Includes M30 CDISCOUNT

 

Between

 

The company CDISCOUNT SA, whose registered office is located at 120-126 Quai de Bacalan, 33000 Bordeaux, registered with the trade and companies register of Bordeaux under number 424 059 822,

 

Duly represented by Mr Anil BENARD-DENDE, Director of BtoB Development,

 

                Hereinafter referred to as “CDISCOUNT”;

 

And

 

The company DISTRIBUTION CASINO FRANCE SAS, whose registered office is located at 1 Esplanade de France, 420000 SAINT ETIENNE, registered in the register of trade and companies of SAINT ETIENNE under number 428 268 023,

 

Duly represented by Mr. Gérard WALTER.

 

                Hereinafter referred to as “DCF”;

 

PREAMBLE

 

The Parties have signed an agreement for provision of services (hereinafter the “Agreement”) as well as a rider concerning price revision. Both the Agreement and the rider were signed on 1 January 2013.

 

The Parties intend, by this rider, to amend certain terms of the Agreement in the conditions presented here below.

 

ARTICLE ONE

 

The Agreement took effect retroactively on 1 July 2010.  It was signed for a first duration of two (2) years, automatically renewable for periods of the same length of time, and each party is free to terminate the agreement subject to one (1) month’s advanced notice, delivered by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt.

 

The Parties have decided to extend its duration for ten (10) years starting from 1 June 2014.

 

This agreement will be automatically renewable for periods of the same length of time and each party is free to terminate it subject to two (2) years’ advance notice, delivered by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt.

 

ARTICLE TWO

 

These amendments take effect starting from 1 June 2014.

 

*

 

*     *

 

All other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged and fully applicable.

 

16 May 2014

 

	
For Cdiscount
    	
For DCF
    
	
[Signature]
    	
[Signature]
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") by CapSource Financial,
Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Fred C. Boethling, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CapSource
Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


       DATE: May 4, 2004                By:  /s/ Fred C. Boethling
                                             ------------------------------
                                        Name: Fred C. Boethling
                                        Chief Executive Officer
#### **Exhibit 32.5**

#### ** **

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Golden Cycle GoldCorporation, (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the amendedAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof

         operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: April 28, 2005

 
|   |   /s/ R. Herbert  Hampton  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                 |
|   |   R. Herbert  Hampton      |
|   |                                 |
|   |   Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer

February 21, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. McLane, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|By: /s/ James W. McLane
|                       
|James W. McLane        
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 14, 2003           

Page 24 of 25
EXHIBIT 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew W. Shankle, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advance Display
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and I have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
          business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
          known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
          period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
          disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my
          conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
          procedures, as of the end the period covered by this report based on
          such evaluation;

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
          business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
          information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the small business
          issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2006


/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer