alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### National Security Agency

# AGENCY:

National Security Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The National Security Agency hereby gives notice of its intent to grant Doar, Pekuin, Sall Limited Liability Company a revocable, non-assignable, exclusive, license to practice the following Government-Owned invention as described in U.S. Patent No. 6,404,407 entitled “Ridge laser with oxidized strain-compensated superlattice of group III-V semiconductor.” The invention is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the National Security Agency.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has fifteen (15) days from the publication date of this notice to file written objections along with any supporting evidence, if any.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the National Security Agency Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marian T. Roche, Director, Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541, telephone (443) 479-9569.

Dated: August 25, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-21540 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Fidelity  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Richard G. Spencer,
Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa L. Griffith, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Richard G. Spencer                            /s/ Lisa L. Griffith
--------------------------------                  ------------------------------
Richard G. Spencer                                Lisa L. Griffith
Chief Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer




May 17, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1468 

KA 11-00252 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DERRICK WALTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

LEONARD, CURLEY & WALSH, PLLC, ROME (MARK C. CURLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M.

Donalty, J.), rendered October 20, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05),

defendant contends that his plea was not voluntarily, knowingly, and

intelligently entered because he did not recite one of the elements of

that crime, i.e., that he threatened the witness. Defendant’s

contention is actually a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the

plea allocution, and thus that challenge is encompassed by the valid

waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Peters, 59 AD3d 928, 928,

lv denied 12 NY3d 820; People v Branch, 49 AD3d 1206, 1206, lv denied

10 NY3d 932; People v Wilson, 38 AD3d 1348, 1348, lv denied 9 NY3d

927). 

Entered: December 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00167

- CV
Stephen Pruski v. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association
On Appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020DCV

- 2256

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, h aving considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be REVERSED and the cause
REMANDED to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with it s opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 23 , 2023
<PAGE>
Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation - Form 10-Q
Nine Months Ended September 30, 1996
Page 21 of 22

<TABLE>
                                               Exhibit (ii)
                             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             -------------------------------------------------


(Dollars in thousands)
<CAPTION>
                      Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                         September 30,      September 30,               Years Ended December 31,
                       -----------------  -----------------   -------------------------------------------
                           1996     1995      1996     1995      1995     1994     1993     1992     1991
                       --------  -------  --------  -------   -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
<S>                    <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Income before income
 taxes. . . . . . . .  $ 65,157 $ 57,985  $194,925 $165,948  $231,334 $218,913 $189,960 $185,704 $148,746
                        -------  -------   -------  -------   -------  -------  -------  -------  -------

Fixed charges:
 Interest on debt . .    50,394   51,236   149,663  150,703   202,090  151,239  137,372  146,594  167,236
 1/3 rental expense .       393      389     1,190    1,154     1,519    1,463    1,575    1,491    1,389
                        -------  -------   -------  -------   -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
Total fixed charges .    50,787   51,625   150,853  151,857   203,609  152,702  138,947  148,085  168,625
                        -------  -------   -------  -------   -------  -------  -------  -------  -------

Total . . . . . . . .  $115,944 $109,610  $345,778 $317,805  $434,943 $371,615 $328,907 $333,789 $317,371
                        =======  =======   =======  =======   =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges (1). .     2.28X    2.12X     2.29X    2.09X     2.14X    2.43X    2.37X    2.25X    1.88X
                        =======  =======   =======  =======   =======  =======  =======  =======  =======
<FN>
(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing income before income taxes and fixed
    charges by fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental expense as
    representative of the interest portion of rentals.

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 U.S.GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATIONS In connection with the report of U.S. Geothermal Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel J. Kunz, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the business issuer. Date: June 15, 2009 /s/ Daniel J. Kunz________________________
Daniel J. Kunz 
Chief Executive Officer


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000768216
<NAME>                        National Air Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,307
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       738
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,045)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        



</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2140 

To improve the transition between experimental permits and commercial 

licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To improve the transition between experimental permits and 

commercial licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH LICENSING. 

4 Section 50906 of title 51, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘suborbital 

7 rocket design’’ and inserting ‘‘suborbital rocket or 

8 rocket design’’; and 

9 (2) by amending subsection (g) to read as fol10 lows: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2140 IS

1 ‘‘(g) A permit may be issued, and a permit that has 

2 already been issued shall remain valid for the uses de3 scribed in subsection (d), for a particular reusable sub4 orbital rocket or rocket design after a license has been 

5 issued for the launch or reentry of a rocket of that de6 sign.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Polar Programs; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee for Polar Programs (1130).
    Date/Time: November 4, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. November 5, 2008, 8 
a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Stafford 
II-595.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Sue LaFratta, Office of Polar Programs (OPP). 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. (703) 292-8030.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, 
programs, and activities on the polar research community, to provide 
advice to the Director of OPP on issues related to long-range planning.
    Agenda: Staff presentations and discussion on opportunities and 
challenges for polar research, education and infrastructure; planning 
for Arctic and Antarctic Committees of Visitors; discussion on 
renewable and alternative energy technologies; and discussion of NSF's 
IPY activity and how it relates to IPY activity worldwide.

    Dated: October 6, 2008.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-24068 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of P2 Solar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Raj-Mohinder S. GurmChief Executive Officer Date: July 14, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         544,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               544,172
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 631,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,202
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     555,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   631,280
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,283
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,653)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,653)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (3)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (3)
        

</TABLE>
#### IN RE FORECLOSURE OF HOOPER

No. 111P01

Case below: 141 N.C. App. 149

Petition by defendant (Eugene Hooper) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 2001.

Justice Martin recused.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

t1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143745

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143745 COA: 296862 Wayne CC: 09-014023-FC LORING MARTEZ-ORLANDO WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00548

- CR

William Eugene Moore

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 10

o f Ta rrant County (1287405 )

March 27, 2014

O pinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgm ent. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____

_ Justice Sue Walker
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2166 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2166

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify provisions 
   relating to determinations of full-time equivalent employees for 
      purposes of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2014

 Mr. Manchin (for himself, Ms. Heitkamp, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
  Begich, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify provisions 
   relating to determinations of full-time equivalent employees for 
      purposes of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Treating Families Fairly Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Exemption of certain employees.--In 
                determining the number of full-time employees of an 
                employer for purposes of this section, an employee that 
                is covered under minimal essential coverage under an 
                eligible employer sponsored plan (as defined in section 
                5000A(f)(2)) as the spouse or child of another employee 
                who is employed by such employer shall not be 
                counted.''.
    (b) Regulations.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall promulgate 
regulations necessary to carry out the amendment made by subsection 
(a), including providing guidance on the status of employees that leave 
their present employer or have a family member leave their present 
employer after an exemption under such amendment has been provided.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 20

  To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2013

   Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
Johanns, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Flake, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Shelby, Mr. 
 Heller, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Lee, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Alexander, 
  Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Isakson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Takeover Repeal Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
(Public Law 111-203) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended by 
such Act are revived or restored as if such Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```