alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James R. YOCOM, Commissioner of Labor, etc. v. Fox HOBSON and Levisa Coal Corporation et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 2, 1973.

Gemma M. Harding, Louisville, Atty. for Special Fund, Department of Labor, for appellant.

Lowe & Lowe, Pikeville, for appellees.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice OSBORNE,

Reversing.*

*

 Opinion ordered not to be published.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of Solar3D,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2010 (the "Report") I, James B.
Nelson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: March 31, 2011




By:  /s/ James B. Nelson
     --------------------------------------------------
     James B. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### A. D. TYSON, Appellant, v. Daisy D. TYSON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

July 13, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.8

                           CONSENT OF NAMED DIRECTOR


          The undersigned does hereby consent to being named as a person about
to become a director in the Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 registration statement
filed by Canaan Energy Corporation relating to 3,830,000 shares of its common
stock.


Dated:  5/16/2000                             /s/ Randy Harp
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Randy Harp
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ramesh Kapur, dba AIC Management Company v. Cassandra Pleasant

Appellate case number: 01-14-00236-CV

Trial court case number: 1013763

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No 2 of Harris County

By notice of November 6, 2014, the Clerk of this Court informed the parties it would 

move forward to resolution of this appeal on issues or points that do not require a reporter’s 

record unless the reporter’s record was filed within 30 days. To date, no response to that notice 

has been received, and no reporter’s record has been filed.

The clerk’s record has previously been filed. We are now considering the record 

complete, and appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c); 38.6(a). Due to the age of this appeal, no extensions of this deadline will be 

considered absent extraordinary circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/_Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 19, 2015
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

Allied Motion Technologies Inc.
 Non-Employee Director
 Stock in Lieu of Cash Retainer Plan
 Adopted November 3, 2010
 Amended and Restated May 13, 2014

 

Election Procedure.  Each non-employee director may elect to forego receipt of all or a portion of any Board, Committee or special retainer otherwise payable in cash under the Company’s non-employee director compensation program in exchange for Common Stock issued under this Plan.  The number of shares of Common Stock received by any non-employee director with respect to a payment date shall equal the amount of foregone cash retainer divided by the Fair Market Value (as defined below) of a share of Common Stock on the relevant payment date, rounded down to the nearest whole share, with the dollar amount of any fractional share paid in cash on the payment date.  If the cash retainer would be paid during a blackout period as defined in the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, then the payment date as used herein for the purchase of shares will be the first day of the next Trading Window as defined in the Insider Trading Policy.  For the purpose of this Plan, the Fair Market Value of a share of common stock on a given date shall be the consolidated closing bid price on that date as reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market.  If there are no common stock transactions on such date, the Fair Market Value shall be determined as of the immediately preceding date on which there were common stock transactions.

 

Election.  A non-employee director may elect Common Stock in place of cash by submitting a written or electronic election to the Company’s Secretary, in such form as the Company determines, by the date established by the Company prior to such payment date.

 

Number of Authorized Shares.  There are 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to this Plan.

 

Adjustments in Authorized Shares.  If a dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, forward or reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange, liquidation, dissolution, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects the Company’s Common Stock, then the Company shall, in such manner as it may determine equitable, substitute or adjust any or all of the remaining limits on the number and kind of shares available under the Plan.

 

Share Shortfalls.  If any election under this Plan would cause the number of shares of Common Stock required to be issued under this Plan to exceed the authorized shares, then any then current elections of non-employee directors shall be reduced or disregarded to the extent necessary, as determined by the Compensation Committee in an equitable manner, to avoid exceeding the authorized shares.  No further elections shall be made or shall be valid until such time, if any, as additional shares of Common Stock become available for purchase under this Plan.

 

Inside Information.  All purchases of Company stock are subject to compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Company’s Insider Trading policy including the defined Trading Window.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALFONSO LEAKE.

September 17, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.10

              [LETTERHEAD OF FRIDUSS, LUKEE, SCHIFF & CO., P.C.]


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                         -----------------------------


We consent to the use in the Form S-4 Registration Statement and Prospectus of
Aviation Group, Inc. of our report dated April 26, 2000 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements of Muffin Communications, Ltd. contained in
such Registration Statement, and to the use of our name and the statements with
respect to us, as appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.



/s/ Friduss, Lukee, Schiff & Co., P.C.

FRIDUSS, LUKEE, SCHIFF & CO., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants


October 23, 2000
Chicago, Illinois
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, Fuying Wang and Jianming Xu, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of HOME SYSTEM GROUP (the "Company"), DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that:




1.    
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.    
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th
day of April, 2009.




/s/
      Fuying WangFuying
      WangChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/
      Jianming XuJianming
      XuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer and Accounting
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Home System Group and will be retained by Home System Group and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10KSB for the Year
ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") by PaperFree Medical Solutions, Inc.,,
the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: July 15, 2006                         /s/ William L Sklar
                                            -----------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       37
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO REGALADO ZAVALA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

Nos. 16-73794 

17-71776 

Agency No. A041-861-417 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2023**

Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Jose Antonio Regalado Zavala, a 

native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying 

his application for cancellation of removal (petition No. 16-73794), and the BIA’s 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 10 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73794 

order denying his motion to reopen (petition No. 17-71776). Our jurisdiction is 

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a 

motion to reopen. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). In petition 

16-73794, we dismiss the petition for review. In petition 17-71776, we deny the 

petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of 

cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Patel v. Garland, 142 S. 

Ct. 1614, 1622-23 (2022) (where the agency denies a form of relief listed in 

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), federal courts have jurisdiction to review 

constitutional claims and questions of law, but not factual findings and 

discretionary decisions). Regalado Zavala’s challenge to the agency’s adverse 

credibility determination does not raise a colorable legal or constitutional claim 

over which we retain jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). Thus, we dismiss 

petition 16-73794.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to 

reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel where petitioner failed to show 

prejudice from the performance of former counsel. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 

339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (petitioner failed to establish prejudice where he 

presented no plausible grounds for relief). Regalado Zavala’s contention that he is 

eligible for asylum and withholding of removal based on an imputed political 
3 16-73794 

opinion is not properly before the court because he failed to raise it before the BIA. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (exhaustion of administrative remedies required); see 

also Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 143 S. Ct. 1103, 1113-14 (2023) (section 

1252(d)(1) is a non-jurisdictional claim-processing rule). Thus, we deny petition 

17-71776.

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

NO. 16-73794: PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

NO. 17-71776: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             653                     614
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,377                  18,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (458)                   (925)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,629                  18,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,994                  38,401
<PP&E>                                          34,823                  33,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,443                  25,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,929                  47,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,860                  15,227
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           377                     377
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,018                   8,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,929                  47,336
<SALES>                                         56,150                  66,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,150                  66,730
<CGS>                                           35,058                  44,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,966                  62,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   790                     889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,484                   2,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    910                   1,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                910                   1,130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       910                   1,130
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24                     .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24                     .30


</TABLE>
#### Richard MYERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44095.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Sept. 16, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1971.

Davis Bragg, of Duncan & Bragg, Kil-leen, for appellant.

Stanley Kicar, Dist. Atty., and Robert B. Wilson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Belton, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is sale of marihuana; the punishment five (5) years.

This is a companion case to our No. 44,-338, Burns v. State, 473 S.W.2d 19. Both appellants were tried together.

This appellant challenges only the failure of the court to suppress the evidence based upon the posse comitatus question plus the court’s failure to charge thereon.

What we have said in the companion opinion disposes of these contentions.

Finding the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

OPINION

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

DALLY, Commissioner.

The appellant’s motion for rehearing was identical to that filed in the companion case of Burns v. State, 473 S.W.2d 19.

What we have said in that companion case disposes of appellant’s contentions.

Remaining convinced that this case was properly decided on original submission, the appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1626 
New York Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                 9,126,000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,008,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            (675,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                               263,845,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      (129,392,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       158,520,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                              268,048,000<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                          (118,329,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         158,520,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      32,715,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         28,331,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    15,989,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (12,943,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (12,943,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       13,688,000
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             745,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             135.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                             135.07
<FN>
<F1> Cash includes $8,792,000 of restricted cash.
<F2> Includes $247,893,000 to a related party.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the “**Company**”) for the period ended June 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Ian D. Cockerill, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

**1****                                     **TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

**2****                                     **Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:November 24, 2006

 
| /s/ Ian D. Cockerill    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Ian D. Cockerill        |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.3






















CONSENT OF EUGENE PURITCH







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of an independent technical study, completed in 2009 (the “Technical Study”) concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading “Item III – Description of the Business – Coulon Property – 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,














				
	 
	/S/

Eugene Puritch

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

Eugene Puritch, P. Eng.

	 
	 












May 15, 2014
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.6
















CONSENT OF PASCAL SIMARD







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Pascal Simard, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Winter 2013 Exploration Program – Wabamisk Project” completed in November 2013; and




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance and Trenching Program, Ashuanipi Project, Québec,” completed in January 2014”,




concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau-Wabamisk and Ashuanipi properties for the Company (collectively the “Reports”). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for the Anatacau-Wabamisk property, under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.2.4 Geological Setting; 3.2.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.2.6 Mineralization” and for the Ashuanipi property, under headings “3.4.4 Geological Setting, 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling, and 3.4.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,














				
	 
	/S/

Pascal Simard

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

Pascal Simard, Jr. Eng.

	 
	 












May 15, 2014