alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      13.1**

**906      Certification**

|   |   |                                                                                                                   |                                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/                  KUEN-YAO (K.Y.) LEE              |
|   |   | Name:                                                                                                                  | Kuen-Yao                  (K.Y.) Lee     |
|   |   | Title:                                                                                                                 | Chief                  Executive Officer |

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |                                         |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/                    MAX                    CHENG                                 |
|   |   | Name:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | Max                      Cheng               |
|   |   | Title:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | Chief                      Financial Officer |

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature      that      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement      required by Section 906, has been provided to AU Optronics Corp. and will be      retained by AU Optronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange      Commission or its staff upon request.**

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00806-CV

John L. Wiley and Randi Wiley, Appellants

v.

William H. Carmean and Linda D. Carmean; Thomas R. Page; Edward J. Mitschke, Jr.;

Texas Country Title Co.; and Chicago Title Insurance Company, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 13,761, HONORABLE REVA TOWSLEE CORBETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July 12, 2011, we abated this appeal to give appellants John L. Wiley and

Randi Wiley 60 days to take action to cure a jurisdictional defect. On August 10, 2011, appellants

filed an unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. Appellants certify that the parties have reached an

agreement to settle all pending claims and that appellants have agreed to dismiss this appeal as part

of the agreement. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant appellants’ motion, and dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).1

Chicago Title Insurance Company previously filed a motion to dismiss for lack of

1

jurisdiction, which we dismiss as moot.
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: August 17, 2011

2
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 12

- 00 516

- CV



### _________________

IN RE COMMITMENT OF CLARENCE DEWAYNE BROWN

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10

- 03

- 02609

- CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Clarence Dewayne Brown filed a notice of appeal from an order denying a motion

.

After conducting an inquiry regarding our jurisdiction, we conclude t he order is not

presently appealable. See generally Lehma n n v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3 d 191, 195

(Tex. 2001) (Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment.). T he appeal

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

__________________________ ______ DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice

Opinion Delivered January 17, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**LASTASHA SERRANO,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 253 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 26th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   FEB-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                                  824
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                             325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        229
<PP&E>                                                  667
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        7,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4,190
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 91
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          7,623
<SALES>                                               2,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                   991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (533)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GERMAN GONZALEZ.

December 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of Asia Interactive Media Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ken Ng, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  April 1, 2013





By:        /s/ Ken Ng


Ken Ng


President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Director
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40957

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES ALTON WEST,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CR-161-2

- - - - - - - - - -

August 1, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Alton West appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with

intent to distribute marijuana. West contends that the evidence

was insufficient to support his conviction and that the district

court erred in denying his motion and amended motion to dismiss

the indictment on grounds of prosecutorial vindictiveness. 

The evidence was sufficient to support West’s conviction. 

See United States v. Maltos, 985 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir. 1992);
No. 96-40957

-2-

United States v. Diaz-Carreon, 915 F.2d 951, 953-54 (5th Cir.

1990). The district court did not err in denying West’s motion

and amended motion to dismiss the indictment because West did not

demonstrate that circumstances warranted a presumption of

vindictiveness or actual vindictiveness. See United States v.

Johnson, 91 F.3d 695, 697-99 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.

Aggarwal, 17 F.3d 737, 744 (5th Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                           CANAAN ENERGY CORPORATION
               Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            Three months ended
                                                              Years ended December 31,                            March 31,
                                           ------------------------------------------------------------    --------------------
                                              1995        1996         1997         1998         1999        1999        2000
                                           ---------    --------     --------     --------     --------    --------    --------
<S>                                        <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings
--------
Pre-tax income                             $  37,884      23,351      223,428      150,339      126,844      66,781      42,268
Add:  interest expense                         2,645          --           --           --           --          --          --
                                           ---------    --------     --------     --------     --------    --------    --------
                                              40,529      23,351      223,428      150,339      126,844      66,781      42,268
                                           ---------    --------     --------     --------     --------    --------    --------

Fixed charges
-------------
Interest expense                               2,645          --           --           --           --          --          --
                                           ---------    --------     --------     --------     --------    --------    --------


Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges                                15.3          (1)          (1)          (1)          (1)         (1)         (1)
                                           =========
</TABLE>

(1) Not applicable since Canaan incurred no interest expense or other fixed
charges.
Exhibit
        32.1
  
 **CERTIFICATION
        BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**
 **THE
        MIDDLEBY CORPORATION**
 **PURSUANT
        TO RULE 13A-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**
 
 This
        certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and 18 U.S.C. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 I,
        Selim
        A. Bassoul, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
        officer) of The Middleby Corporation (the “Registrant”), certify, to the best of
        my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
        the
        period ended March 31, 2007 of the Registrant (the “Report”), that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Exchange Act; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  aspects, the financial `condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant.
 
 Date:
        May
        10, 2007
 
 /s/
        Selim A. Bassoul
 Selim
        A.
        Bassoul
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date & Time:

 Tuesday, August 24, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. 

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Date & Time:

 Thursday, August 26, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor)

# Status:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2010-14: Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee by its counsel, Marc E. Elias, Esq., and Jonathan S. Berkon, Esq., of Perkins Coie, LLP.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2010-15: Pike for Congress by its counsel, Brian G. Svoboda, Esq., and Jonathan S. Berkon, Esq., of Perkins Coie, LLP.

Explanation and Justification and Final Rules on Coordinated Communications.

Explanation and Justification and Final Rules on Federal Election Activity.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# Person to Contact for Information:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-21408 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GEORGE ALBERTO BELTRAN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 50232

D.C. No. 3: 12

- cr

- 00002

- MMA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

George Alberto Beltran appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bel tran contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not pr ecedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 50232

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a

defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582(c)(2). See United

States v. Paulk , 569 F.3d 1094, 10 95 (9th Cir. 2009). Beltran is not eligible for a

sentence reduction because his sentence was not “based on a sentencing range that

has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) . Rather, his sentence was based on the statutory mandatory minimum

under 21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(1)(B) . Thus, t he district court properly denied relief.

See Paulk , 569 F.3d at 1095.

Beltran’s additional claims are not cognizable under section 3582(c)(2). See

Dillon v. United States , 560 U.S. 817, 831 (2010) ( alleged sentencing errors are

“outside the scope of the proceeding authorized by § 3582(c)(2) ” ).

AFFIRMED

.
IN THE S UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22

- 0509

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ROBERT WINKOWITSCH

Appellee

,

- vs

GLACIER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, IN C

. ,

Appellant

.
::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER GRANTING
UNOPPOSED MOTION OF
APPELLANT GLACIER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,
INC

. FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE ITS OPENING
BRIEF

Appell ant Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc. having moved in accordance

wit h Rule 26(1), M.R.App.P., for a n extension of t ime of thirty (30) days , up to

and including April 26

, 2023, within which to file and serve its opening brief , and

the mot ion being unopposed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted; Appellant ’ s ope ning

brief in this matter is now due on A pril 26, 2023

.

Dated this

__ d ay o f March, 2023

.

_________________________________ B owen Greenwood
Cl e rk of the Montana Supreme Court

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 23 2023

03/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0509
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          36,983
<SECURITIES>                                    57,996
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,555
<INVENTORY>                                      3,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,906
<PP&E>                                          45,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,588
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,289
<SALES>                                         35,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,954
<CGS>                                           18,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,546
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,955
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
#### Donald HAMPTON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 17, 1974.

Anthony M. Wilhoit, Public Defender, Anna H. Isaacs, Asst. Public Defender, Frankfort, for appellant.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., G. Edward James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for ap-pellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice STEPHENSON.*

*

 Opinion ordered not to be published.