alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of Titan Global Holdings, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis
        Okumura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Titan Global Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Global Holdings,
        Inc.
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
  Date:
                July 14, 2006
              
              /s/ Curtis
                OkumuraCurtis
                OkumuraChief
                Executive Officer
#### MARIKA VON VICZAY v. SELINE THOMS

No. 572A00

(Filed 4 May 2001)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 140 N.C. App.-, 538 S.E.2d 629 (2000), affirming an order for summary judgment entered orally in open court on 12 July 1999 and entered in writing in an undated order signed by Noble, J., in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 April 2001.

*JohnE. Tate, Jr., for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Frank J. Contrivo and Rick S. Queen for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-62688A; File Nos. SR-BATS-2010-018; SR-BX-2010-044; SR-CBOE-2010-065; SR-CHX-2010-14; SR-EDGA-2010-05; SR-EDGX-2010-05; SR-FINRA-2010-033; SR-ISE-2010-66; SR-NYSE-2010-49; SR-NYSEAmex-2010-63; SR-NYSEArca-2010-61; SR-NASDAQ-2010-079; SR-NSX-2010-08]

      ( print page 52558)    
                    The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 18, 2010, concerning a Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule Changes Relating to Trading Pauses Due to Extraordinary Market Volatility by BATS Exchange, Inc.; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; International Securities Exchange LLC; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; National Stock Exchange, Inc.; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE Amex LLC; and NYSE Arca, Inc. The document contained a typographical error in the signature block.                

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 18, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-20366, on page 51138, in the 3rd column, correct the signature block to read “By the Commission” and remove footnote 7.                

Florence E. Harmon,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-21176 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-097)]

Notice of Information Collection

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: All comments should be submitted within 60 calendar days from 
the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed Lori Parker, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, Mail Suite 2S65, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions 
should be directed to Lori Parker, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer, NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., Mail Suite 2S65, 
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-1351, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Abstract:
    The purpose of this survey is to assimilate lunar regolith 
stimulant requirements as well as Apollo sample requests for the ETDP 
and Constellation projects and test facilities.

II. Method of Collection

    Electronic.

III. Data

    Title: Lunar Regolith & Stimulant Users' Survey for the In Situ 
Resource Utilization Web site.
    OMB Number: 2700--XXXX).
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Affected Public: Individuals and household.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 31.
    Estimated Time per Response: 10 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0.

IV. Requests for Comments

    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
NASA, including whether the information collected has practical 
utility; (2) the accuracy of NASA's estimate of the burden (including 
hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including automated collection techniques 
or the use of other forms of information technology.

Lori Parker,
NASA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-21690 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEROY BUNTING.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification deniéd.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00806- CV

John L . Wiley and Ran di Wil ey, Appellants

v. William H. Car m ean and L ind a D. Carm ean; Thom as R. P age; Edward J. Mitschke, Jr.; Texas Country Title Co.; and Chicago Title Insu rance C om pany, Ap pellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F LEE CO UNTY, 335 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 13,7 61, H ONO RAB LE REVA TOW SLEE CO RB ETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On J uly 12, 2011, we abate d this appea l t o gi v e appellants J ohn L
. Wil ey and Randi Wil ey 60 day s to take action to c ure a jurisdictional de fec t. On Aug ust 10, 2011, appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss appea l. Appellants ce rt ify that the parties have rea ched an ag ree ment to settle all pending claims and that appellants have ag ree d to dismiss this appea l as part of the a g ree ment. Acc ording ly , we r einstate the appea l, g rant appellants’ m otion, and dis miss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1). 1

Chicag o Title I nsuranc e Company previously filed a motion to dismiss for lack o f 1 jurisdiction, which we dismiss as moot.__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: Aug ust 17, 2011

2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated October 5, 1999
included in American TeleSource International, Inc.'s amended Form 10-K for the
year ended July 31, 1999 and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.


     /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
     Arthur Andersen LLP


     San Antonio, Texas
     August 24, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James W. McLane, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Healthaxis Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 12, 2004 By:
    /s/ James W. McLaneJames W. McLaneChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Reliance Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), F.R. Saunders, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey A. Paolucci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|                                      | 
|F. R.   Saunders, Jr.                 | 
|President /   Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 
|                                      | 
|                                      | 
|Jeffrey A.   Paolucci                 | 
|Chief   Financial Officer             | 

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                               43,383
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                   0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                     0
<EQUITIES>                                             22
<MORTGAGE>                                            287
<REAL-ESTATE>                                           0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                     44,477
<CASH>                                              6,995
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 15,948
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              4,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    100,735
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                    41,271
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                   761
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     32,848
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                               5,175
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     3,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                           580
<COMMON>                                            1,024
<OTHER-SE>                                         19,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      100,735
<PREMIUMS>                                         52,870
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                 2,853
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  4,264
<OTHER-INCOME>                                         24
<BENEFITS>                                         35,309
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         1,148
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               27,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (3,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (949)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.31)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                          0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                     0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                       0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                      0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                        0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                         0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                 0
                                  

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advance Display Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer

February 22, 2005
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2121 

To repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2014 

Mr. WALSH (for himself, Mr. BEGICH, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal REAL ID 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TITLE II OF THE REAL ID ACT OF 2005. 

7 Title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (division B of 

8 Public Law 109–13; 49 U.S.C. 30301 note) is repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of John C. Hehn, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

March 19, 1957.

*802*S chilling er <& Per chick*for proponent.

John D. Bennett, S.

In this uncontested prohate proceeding, the propounded instrument bears the date of January 5, 1924. One witness is dead; the other, whose present address is unknown, “ possibly now resides in Ireland ”.

The quantum of proof ordinarily required seems to be modified (according to the authorities) where the will proffered is more than 30 years old. Such a document is denominated an *‘ ‘*ancient will ’ ’ and is treated in the same manner as other “ ancient documents ” (see *Matter of Barney,*185 App. Div. 782, 798, 799; 2 Jessup Redfield on Surrogates Law and Practice [rev. ed., 1947], § 1127; McCormick on Evidence [1954], p. 401 *et seq.).*The application of the ancient document rule to wills may be found in cases dating back to the early 19th century *(Northrop*v. *Wright,*24 Wend. 221, revd. 7 Hill 476 [1840]; *Staring*v. *Bowen,*6 Barb. 109 [1849]; *Jackson ex dem. Lewis*v. *Laroway,*3 Johns. Cas. 283 [1803]; *Jackson ex dem. Burhans*v. *Blanshan,*3 Johns. 292 [1808]; *Jackson ex dem. Hunt*v. *Luquere,*5 Cow. 221 [1825]; *Jackson ex dem. Henry*v. *Thompson,*6 Cow. 178 [1826]; *Jackson ex dem. Bowman*v. *Christman,*4 Wend. 277 [1830]; *Fetherly*v. *Waggoner,*11 Wend. 599 [1834]; *Rider*v. *Legg,*51 Barb. 260 [1868]; *Matter of Hall,*90 Misc. 216 [1915]).

Wigmore asserts: ‘ For three centuries the rule has existed, unquestioned in its general validity, that an ancient document, under certain conditions, is to be taken as sufficiently evidenced, in regard to its genuineness of execution, to be submitted to the jury.

*“*The reasons for this specific and simple rule are twofold. First, after a long lapse of time, ordinary testimonial evidence from those who saw the document’s execution or knew the style of handwriting or heard the party admit the execution, is practically unavailable, and a necessity always exists for resorting to circumstantial evidence. Secondly, the circumstance of age — or long existence — of the document, together *803with its place of custody,, its unsuspicious appearance, and perhaps other circumstances, suffice, in combination, as evidence to be submitted to the jury.” (7 Wigmore on Evidence [3d ed.], § 2137.) Wigmore further states that it is universally conceded that the rule applies to all sorts of documents ‘ ‘ in particular, to wills ” (§ 2145).

The genuineness of the signatures, the unsuspicious appearance of the instrument, its production from a natural place of custody and the recitals of the attestation clause having all been shown, the propounded instrument will be admitted to probate as the will of the decedent and the testimony of the dead and absent witnesses is dispensed with (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 142).

Submit decree.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH L. MESSINGER.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

906 Certification



Securities and
Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report)
for the purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Kuen-Yao (K.Y.) Lee, the Chief Executive Officer and Max Cheng, the Chief Financial
Officer of AU Optronics Corp., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AU Optronics Corp.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 7, 2004



/s/  KUEN-YAO (K.Y.) LEEName: Kuen-Yao (K.Y.) LeeTitle:    Chief Executive Officer/s/  MAX
CHENGName: Max ChengTitle:    Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
AU Optronics Corp. and will be retained by AU Optronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.