alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Leroy HICKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46043.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1972.

Dan J. Anderson, Richardson, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., W. T. West-moreland, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

The offense is rape, the punishment forty years’ confinement. Appellant pled *138guilty to the charge and punishment was assessed by the court.

Appellant cites one broad ground of error for this Court to consider. He contends that the trial court “erred in not allowing appellant sufficient time in which to consult with counsel and in which to prepare for trial in this matter.” Appellant does not point out any specific portion of the record which would substantiate such an allegation, nor does he cite any authorities.

The record reflects that appellant entered a plea of guilty, and was properly admonished by the court. Before the judge accepted the guilty plea, the following colloquy occurred:

> “THE COURT: Now, I appointed Mr. Steve Halsey to talk to you and to represent you on this case. Has he talked to you about it?

> “THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

> “THE COURT: Have you discussed the case with him?

> “THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

> “THE COURT: Has he explained all of your rights to you?

> “THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.”

Subsequently, appellant took the stand and when questioned by the prosecutor, stated:

> “Q Now, Mr. Hicks, you understand that you have a right to a jury trial in this case if you want one?

> “A Yes, sir.

> “Q And, Mr. Halsey was appointed today and he has done exafly what you desired in this case. Is that right ?

> “A Yes, sir.

> ‡ ‡ 1⁄8 1⁄8 H< ‡

> “Q You understand you have ten days that you can delay this trial if you wanted to. Are you waiving that right and do you want to be tried today ?

> “A Yes, sir.

> “Q Okay. Now, you informed the District Attorney’s office of this yesterday, I believe. Is that right?

> “A Yes, sir.

> “Q That you wanted a quick and speedy trial in this case?

> “A Yes, sir.”

Further, appellant and his counsel filed a waiver of the ten day period in which to prepare for trial.

Appellant cannot now be heard to complain that he did not have adequate time to prepare a defense. See Wright v. State, 388 S.W.2d 194 (Tex.Cr.App.1965).

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       24
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3229
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3229
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    58
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (84)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (84)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (84)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
13.1






906
Certification




Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549




Ladies and
Gentlemen:




The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) for the
purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.




Hsuan Bin
(H.B.) Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of AU Optronics Corp., certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:




1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and




2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of AU Optronics
Corp.




Date: June
3, 2008


By:
            /s/   HSUAN
      BIN (H.B.) CHENName:
            Hsuan
      Bin (H.B.) ChenTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to AU Optronics Corp. and will be
retained by AU Optronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2078 

To prohibit Federal funding for motorcycle checkpoints, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2014 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, and 

Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding for motorcycle checkpoints, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Motorcycle 

5 Checkpoint Funding Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT RESTRICTION. 

7 Notwithstanding section 153 of title 23, United 

8 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may not pro9 vide a grant or any funds to a State, county, town, townVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:34 Mar 06, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2078.IS S2078

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2078 IS

1 ship, Indian tribe, municipality, or other local government 

2 that may be used for any program— 

3 (1) to check helmet usage; or 

4 (2) to create checkpoints that specifically target 

5 motorcycle operators or motorcycle passengers. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 22 2010 |   |   |   | /s/      William Casey McManemin |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                        |   |   |   | William      Casey McManemin     |
|                        |   |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer     |
|                        |   |   |   |                             |
| Date:      February 22 2010 |   |   |   | /s/      H.C. Allen, Jr.         |
|                        |   |   |   | H.C.      Allen, Jr.             |
|                        |   |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer     |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthAxis Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. McLane,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ James W. McLane

James W. McLane
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003
Exhibit 4.8

FORM 51-102F3

 

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT

 

Item 1.                                                         Name and Address of Company

 

Neovasc Inc. (the “Company”)

13700 Mayfield Place, Suite 2135

Richmond, BC,

V6V 2E4

 

Item 2.                                                         Date of Material Change

 

May 8, 2014

 

Item 3.                                                         News Release

 

A news release announcing this material change was issued May 8, 2014 and a copy has been filed on SEDAR.

 

Item 4.                                                         Summary of Material Changes

 

On May 8, 2014, the Company announced that Vicki Bebeau joined the Company in the role of Vice President, Clinical Affairs.

 

Item 5.                                                         5.1 — Full Description of Material Change

 

On May 8, 2014, the Company announced that Vicki Bebeau joined the Company in the role of Vice President, Clinical Affairs. The position of Vice President, Clinical Affairs is a newly created position with the Company.

 

Ms. Bebeau joins the Company as it begins to prepare formal clinical feasibility studies for its Tiara device for the transcatheter treatment of mitral valve disease and the design of a US-IDE study to support an application for FDA approval of the Reducer. The Company anticipates beginning the Tiara device study towards the end of the 2014 calendar year with the Reducer study expected to begin in 2015.

 

5.2 — Disclosure for Restructuring Transactions

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 6.                                                         Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 7.                                                         Omitted Information

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 8.                                                         Executive Officer

 

For further information, please contact Chris Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, at 604-270-4344.

 

Item 9.                                                         Date of Report

 

May 9, 2014.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 5.1

                           GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY
                          A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
TELEPHONE: (972) 419-8300                                2200 ONE GALLERIA TOWER
FAX: (972) 419-8329        ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS     13355 NOEL ROAD, L.B. 48
                                                       DALLAS, TEXAS  75240-6657

                                August 9, 2000

Inland Resources Inc.
410 17th Street
Suite 700
Denver, Colorado 80202

     Re:  Form S-8 Registration Statement relating to the registration of 29,200
          shares of common stock, $.001 par value, of Inland Resources Inc.
          pursuant to the  Stock Option Agreement dated October 1, 1999 with
          Michael J. Stevens

Gentlemen:

     We are acting as counsel for Inland Resources Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, of a Registration Statement for the Company on Form S-8
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") (the "Registration
Statement"), covering an aggregate of 29,200 shares (the "Shares") of common
stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company which will
be issued pursuant to the Stock Option Agreement dated October 1, 1999 with
Michael J. Stevens.

     In that connection, we have examined the Form S-8 Registration Statement in
the form to be filed with the SEC.  We have also examined and are familiar with
the originals or authenticated copies of all corporate or other documents,
records and instruments that we have deemed necessary or appropriate to enable
us to render the opinion expressed below.

     We have assumed that all signatures on all documents presented to us are
genuine, that all documents submitted to us as originals are accurate and
complete, that all documents submitted to us as copies are true and correct
copies of the originals thereof, that all information submitted to us was
accurate and complete and that all persons executing and delivering originals or
copies of documents examined by us were competent to execute and deliver such
documents.  In addition, we have assumed that the Shares will not be issued for
consideration equal to less than the par value thereof and that the form of
consideration to be received by the Company for the Shares will be lawful
consideration under the Washington Business Corporation Act.

     Based on the foregoing and having due regard for the legal considerations
we deem relevant, we are of the opinion that the Shares, or any portion thereof,
when issued as described in the Registration Statement, will be validly issued
by the Company, fully paid and nonassessable.

     This opinion is limited in all respects to the laws of the United States of
America and the Washington Business Corporation Act.

     This opinion may be filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C.

                                    GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY, P.C.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Triple-S Management Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: March 23, 2005   By: /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas               Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas       *President and*       *Chief Executive Officer*
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Income RealEstate, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officerof the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chieffinancial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Peggy Joyce Ruth

, * From the 35 th District

Court of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV1002049

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00087

- CV * May 23, 2013

Arma Lee Crow, James Albert Crow, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
and Sandra Kay Ford, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has considered Arma Lee Crow, James Albert Crow, and Sandra

Kay Ford’s motion for jurisdictional determination and concludes that the motion

should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is

dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Peggy

Joyce Ruth.
#### OLIVER UNITED FILTERS, Incorporated, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 8211.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1938.

Earl & Hall & Gerdes, Robert H. Gerdes, Wm. L. Oliver, and Chaffee E. Hall, all of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Allen E. Throop, Gen. Counsel, and Thomas J. Lynch, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered petition to review herein dismissed, tiiat a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate issued forthwith.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. ("Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Foss, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Diana S. Tone, Chief
Financial Officer and Compliance Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


March 25, 2005                    /s/ Richard A. Foss
--------------                    ----------------------------------------------
Date                              Richard A. Foss
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer


March 25, 2005                    /s/ Diana S. Tone
--------------                    ----------------------------------------------
Date                              Diana S. Tone
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Compliance Officer