alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 310 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2062 

To authorize Members of Congress to bring an action for declaratory and 

injunctive relief in response to a written statement by the President 

or any other official in the executive branch directing officials of the 

executive branch to not enforce a provision of law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

MARCH 3, 2014 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To authorize Members of Congress to bring an action for 

declaratory and injunctive relief in response to a written 

statement by the President or any other official in the 

executive branch directing officials of the executive 

branch to not enforce a provision of law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Constitutional Check 

5 and Balance Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2062 PCS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING CAUSE OF ACTION BY MEMBERS OF 

2 CONGRESS IN RESPONSE TO WRITTEN STATE3 MENT BY THE PRESIDENT OR OTHER EXECU4 TIVE BRANCH OFFICIAL DIRECTING EXECU5 TIVE BRANCH OFFICIALS TO NOT ENFORCE A 

6 LAW. 

7 (a) CAUSE OF ACTION AUTHORIZED.—If the Presi8 dent or any other official in the executive branch of the 

9 Federal Government issues a memorandum or other writ10 ten statement directing any official in the executive branch 

11 to not enforce a provision of law, a Member of Congress 

12 who meets the requirement described in subsection (b) 

13 may bring an action for declaratory or injunctive relief in 

14 an appropriate United States district court to compel such 

15 official to enforce the provision of law. 

16 (b) REQUIREMENT FOR ELIGIBILITY.—The require17 ment described in this subsection with respect to a provi18 sion of law is that the Member of Congress cast a recorded 

19 vote on final passage of the version of the bill or joint 

20 resolution that enacted the provision into law. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 310 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2062 

A BILL 

To authorize Members of Congress to bring an acforce a provision of law. ing officials of the executive branch to not en- any other official in the executive branch direct- sponse to a written statement by the President or tion for declaratory and injunctive relief in reMARCH 3, 2014 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Charles
        A.
        Fust, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April
              13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Charles
              A. FustCharles
              A. FustChairman
              and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1


UHF
INCORPORATED


CERTIFICATE
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. ss.1350











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of UHF
Incorporated, (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the period ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Ronald C. Schmeiser, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify that to my
knowledge:





(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date: 
      September
      19, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/ Ronald C.
      SchmeiserRonald
      C. SchmeiserPresident,
      Chief ExecutiveOfficer
      and Chief Financial Officer
---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual report of Titan Global Holdings Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott
        Hensell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities and Exchange Act
                of
                  1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result
                of
                  operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to Titan Global Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Global
        Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
        its
        staff upon request.
  Date:
                  January 16, 2007
              
              
              By:*/s/*Scott
                  Hensell**Scott
                  Hensell
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
  34
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1703

TIFFANY RICKS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DR. MICHAEL Q. HUYNH , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:20

- cv - 00292

- RGD

- DEM )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. William G. Shields, SHIELDS LAW FIRM PLLC, North Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellant. Sandra M. Douglas, HANCOCK, DANIEL & JOHNSON, P.C., Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellee.

Un published opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1703 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Tiffany Ricks appeals the district court’s entry of judgment in Defendant’s favor after the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Rick’s motion to per mit a late expert witness identification and then granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Ricks’ malpractice claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. W e therefore defer to the district court’s “broad discretion in deter mining whether [Ricks’] . . . untimely disclosure of evidence [wa]s substantially justified or harmless , ” Hill v. Coggins , 867 F.3d 499, 507 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted) , and affirm the district court ’s judgment , s ee Ricks v. Huynh , N o
. 2:20

- cv - 00292

- RGD

- DEM ( E .D. Va

. May 20 , 202 1 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1703 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

COREY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 635 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JON WAYNE REYNOLDS.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDING  MARCH 31,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFRENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      1,179,531
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,852,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                  429,000
<INVENTORY>                                 4,042,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            8,074,140
<PP&E>                                     15,404,079
<DEPRECIATION>                              4,815,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             20,282,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,898,220
<BONDS>                                     4,867,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    9,082,382
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,204,146)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               20,282,401
<SALES>                                    15,088,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           15,088,373
<CGS>                                       6,131,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              14,649,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            154,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               267,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                  104,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           163,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  163,138
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02





</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1916 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to modify the program for the sanctuary system for surplus chimpanzees 

by terminating the authority for the removal of chimpanzees from the system for research purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

S 1916 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chimp Haven is Home 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SANCTUARY SYSTEM FOR SURPLUS CHIMPANZEES; 

5 TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY FOR REMOVAL 

6 FROM SYSTEM FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section 481C of the 

8 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 287a–3a) (added by 

9 section 2 of Public Law 106–551) is amended in sub10 section (d)— 

11 (1) in paragraph (2), in subparagraph (J), by 

12 striking ‘‘If any chimpanzee is removed’’ and all that 

13 follows; and 

14 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

15 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

16 (i) by striking clause (ii); and 

17 (ii) by striking ‘‘except as provided’’ 

18 in the matter preceding clause (i) and all 

19 that follows through ‘‘behavioral studies’’ 

20 and inserting the following: ‘‘except that 

21 the chimpanzee may be used for 

22 noninvasive behavioral studies’’; 

23 (B) by striking subparagraph (B); 

24 (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 

25 subparagraph (B); and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

S 1916 RFH

1 (D) in subparagraph (B) (as so redesig2 nated), by striking ‘‘under subparagraphs (A) 

3 and (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘under subparagraph 

4 (A)’’. 

5 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Part E of title IV of 

6 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is 

7 amended by redesignating the second section 481C (added 

8 by section 204(a) of Public Law 106–505) as section 

9 481D. 

Passed the Senate December 13, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        90,960
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,608
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              110,836
<PP&E>                        6,501,297
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                6,612,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         179,509
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    6,432,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  6,612,133
<SALES>                       638,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              677,387
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 376,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              60,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               241,002
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           241,002
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  241,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 7.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                 7.89
        

</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JOHN MADIN/LORDLAND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL FOR PINELANDS DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. PLANNING BOARD OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, ATLANTIC COUNTY v. NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
#### Dinwiddie LAMPTON, Jr., Appellant, v. FISCAL COURT OF OLDHAM COUNTY et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 1, 1974.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1974.

Gerald Kirven, Middleton, Reutlinger & Baird, Louisville, for appellant.

James W. Pike, Thomas F. Manby, Jr., LaGrange, for appellees.

CATINNA, Commissioner.

Dinwiddie Lampton, Jr., filed a proceeding in the Oldham Circuit Court alleging that the Oldham Fiscal Court, the Planning and Zoning Commission, Patrick Calhoun, Jr., and the Lantz Company had, in effecting a change in zoning on property adjoining Lampion’s, acted in an unreasonable, capricious, and arbitrary manner.

Calhoun and Lantz Company moved that the complaint be dismissed because Lamp-ton had failed to perfect his appeal from the order of the fiscal court ■ as was required by CR 72.01, in that he had not filed a certified copy of the order or executed a bond.

Lampton, by response, stated that the proceeding was not an appeal but a direct attack upon the order of the court.

The trial court dismissed the complaint upon the ground that Lampton had failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of CR 72.01 in perfecting an appeal. This court has consistently recognized that a direct attack for unreasonableness or arbitrary actions was available in zoning proceedings to the party aggrieved. Johnson v. Lagrew, Ky., 447 S.W.2d 98 (1969). Cf. Pierson Trapp Company v. Peak, Ky., 340 S.W.2d 456 (1960). It was error on *38the part of the trial court to dismiss Lamp-ton’s complaint.

The judgment is reversed for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

All concur.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00199-CV

TEXAS HEALTH HARRIS METHODIST 

HOSPITAL FORT WORTH, Appellant

and Appellee

V.

STEPHEN FEATHERLY, Appellee and 

Appellant

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2016-003319-3)

April 14, 2022

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

Dissenting Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent 

with this opinion.

It is further ordered that Steven Featherly shall pay all costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2154

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2014

 Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Reauthorization Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and inserting ``each 
of fiscal years 2015 through 2019''.
                                 <all>
```
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 16, 2009 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Stephen J. Sperco        |   |
| Stephen      J. Sperco       |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00728

- CV

IN RE LINK NEW TECH INC

. , and Granitize of San Anto nio, Inc.,

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On November 4, 2016, R elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emerg ency motion to stay. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency

motion to Stay are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a

later date.

It is so ORDERED on November 7, 2016

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Ju stice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI17911, styled Link New Tech Inc., Granitize of San Antonio, Inc.

v. MaxxMark a Inc., MaxxMarka International, LLC, Rasha Youssef, Clinique Hoskin, and Roxanne Salazar v. Adam

Awad, Regavita Thomas, and Demetrice Thomas , pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas,

the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.
July 30, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROBERT VILLARREAL, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00311-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court 

orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.