alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Finis S. RANKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 26665.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District.

Feb. 4, 1974.

Bruce W. Simon, Kansas City, for appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Robert Presson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DIXON, C. J., and SHANGLEK and WASSERSTROM, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order entered in a 27.26, V.A.M.R., proceeding overruling the motion and denying the movant an evidentiary hearing. The sole point on appeal asserts that petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed, after an unsuccessful direct appeal, to proceed by certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. This ground was not set forth in the 27.26 motion, although appointed counsel had advised movant that his motion could be amended to include this claim. The issue presented is governed by the holding in Fritz v. State, 449 S.W.2d 174 (Mo.1970). An opinion in this case would have no precedential value.

The trial court judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16.
EXHIBIT 32.1



UHF INCORPORATED

CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. ss.1350



CERTIFICATION



As required by 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, the undersigned
certify that this Report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in this Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: January 7, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald C. Schmeiser
|                      |  |     |  | Ronald C. Schmeiser    
|                      |  |     |  | President
No. 12,319.

#### The State, ex rel. Howard, Prosecuting Attorney, *v.*The Crawfordsville and Darlington Turnpike Company.

Filed June 10, 1885.

From the Montgomery Circuit Court..

*J. M. Thompson, W. B. Herod, J. H. Burford, W. H. Thompson*and *F. M. Howard,*for appellant.

P. *S. Kennedy, S. C. Kennedy, E. C. Snyder, G. W. Paul*and *J. E. Humphries,*for appellee.

Howk, J.

this case, the same questions are presented for decision,, and in the same manner, as those which were considered and decided by this court in *Stale, ex rel., etc.,*v. *Crawfordsville and Shannondale Tp. Co., ante,*p. 283. For the reasons given in the case cited, this cause must be-decided as that was decided.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/3 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 13, 2007
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 13, 2007





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated March 8, 2006,accompanying the financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statements of Dorchester Minerals L.P., Inc. on Form S-4 (File No. 333-124544, effective May 2, 2005). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

GrantThornton LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 8, 2006
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Fields Limited (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul A. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 4 April 2018



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Paul A. Schmidt    
|Paul A. Schmidt        
|Chief Financial Officer
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and 

Dissenting Opinions filed April 18, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00797-CV

IN RE DENA HALL AND DE’VON BANKETT, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Court at Law No. 5

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21-CCV-069075

MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION

Persisting in my view that our duty as judges is to reach a decision on the 

merits based on a proper record and that due process and due course of law require 

that this court give notice when the original-proceeding record does not comply with 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I would give relators ten-days’ notice of 

involuntary dismissal for failure to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

52.3 and 52.7. See Tex. R. App. Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1) (necessary contents of 
2

petition); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a) (requiring (1) a certified or sworn copy of every 

document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any 

underlying proceeding and (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant 

testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in 

evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter 

complained); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 132.001 (authorizing unsworn 

declarations); In re Kholaif, 624 S.W.3d 228, 231 (order), mand. dism’d, 615 S.W.3d 

369 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020) (orig. proceeding).

This court has not been consistent with its handling of original proceedings in 

which the relators did not comply with Rule 52. Compare In re Hawkins, 

No. 14-22-00474-CR, 2022 WL 3973867, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

Sept. 1, 2022, no pet.) with In re Hinton, No. 14-22-00543-CR, 2022 WL 16571199, 

at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 1, 2022, no pet.) and In re Catt, 

No. 14-22-00583-CV, 2022 WL 11551248, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

Oct. 20, 2022, no pet.) (Spain, J., concurring). Kholaif is this court’s controlling 

precedent, but even if the court ignores that, the potential appearance of subjective 

decision-making in the absence of an improper original-proceeding record is 

unfortunate.1

1 A positive step forward is the checklist for original proceedings that has been posted on 

the court’s website to assist parties filing an original proceeding.
3

I dissent from the court’s failure to provide notice and an opportunity to cure.

I express no opinion on the merits of the petition for a writ of mandamus.

/s/ Charles A. Spain

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson (Spain, J., dissenting).
#### KANSAS CITY, Missouri, Respondent, v. Maurice L. TROUTNER, Appellant.

No. KCD 27002.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District.

June 2, 1975.

*64Roy W. Brown, Larry C. Larson, Kansas City, for appellant.

Aaron A. Wilson, City Atty., Louis W. Benecke, Walter J. O’Toole, Jr., Asst. City Attys., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before WASSERSTROM, P. J., and SHANGLER and DIXON, JJ.

DIXON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction of the defendant involving a violation of an ordinance of the City of Kansas City, Missouri relating to the control of a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Upon conviction in the Municipal Court, the defendant appealed to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, and, on the 29th day of June, 1973, an appeal was heard by the court sitting without a jury. At the close of the evidence, the court said, “The defendant is found guilty and fined $100.00 and costs.” Defense counsel indicated an appeal would be taken and the bond was continued. On July 5, 1973, the defendant filed a motion for a new trial. No ruling on that motion for a new trial appears, but, by operation of law, it was overruled in ninety days or on or about October 5, 1973; and, on October 9, 1973, the defendant filed a notice of appeal to this court. The record is completely lacking of any final judgment, and the appeal must be dismissed. State v. Nichols, 474 S.W.2d 54 (Mo.App.1971); State v. Chase, 415 S.W.2d 731 (Mo.1967); State v. Grant, 380 S.W.2d 799, 803 (Mo.1964). Rule 27.20, V.A.M.R.

Appeal dismissed.

All concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green, Jr.Walter Reid Green, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:  April 15, 2010








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Annual Report of Monmouth Community Bancorp on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Anthony
Giordano, III, Chief Financial Officer of Monmouth Community Bancorp, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


         (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or
               78o(d), and,


         (2)   the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Monmouth Community Bancorp.





Dated:  March 27, 2003                            /s/ Anthony Giordano, III
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Anthony Giordano, III
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         506,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               506,015
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     526,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,123
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,891
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (5)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (5)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /S/ Troy LowrieTroy LowrieChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONI, Duane L. Sinn, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2007 of Rurban Financial Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.      Date: May 10, 2007 /s/ Duane L. Sinn Duane L. Sinn
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date: March 18, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Juan J. RománJuan J. RománVice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2241 

To enhance the safety of drug-free playgrounds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To enhance the safety of drug-free playgrounds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug-Free Play5 grounds Safety Enhancement Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DRUG-FREE PLAYGROUNDS. 

7 Section 419 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

8 U.S.C. 860) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘video arcade 

10 facility’’ and inserting ‘‘video amusement game facil11 ity’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (e)— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2241 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

2 (i) by striking ‘‘outdoor facility’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘outdoor area’’; 

4 (ii) by striking ‘‘three or more sepa5 rate’’ and inserting ‘‘1 or more’’; 

6 (iii) by inserting ‘‘play structures,’’ 

7 after ‘‘not limited to,’’; and 

8 (iv) by striking ‘‘and teeterboards’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘seesaw, merry-go-round, 

10 slides, jungle gym, chin-up bars, sandbox, 

11 spring rider, monkey bars, overhead lad12 ders, trapeze rings, playhouses, rope 

13 bridges, and mazes’’; and 

14 (B) by amending paragraph (3) to read as 

15 follows: 

16 ‘‘(3) The term ‘video amusement game facility’ 

17 means any facility, legally accessible to persons 

18 under 18 years of age, intended primarily for amuse19 ment, which contains video game machines or other 

20 similar youth games.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 8, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.125 Agency- and GSE-Backed Mortgage Pools 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WAYNE N. LONG,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 472 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of February, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Employment Agreement dated this 20th
day of May 2014 by and between Union Center National Bank (“Bank”) and Mr. James W. Sorge (“Executive”).


WHEREAS, Bank and Executive entered into an
agreement dated April 12, 2013 with respect to Executive’s employment with Bank (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, Bank and Executive are desirous of
entering into an Amendment to the Agreement to clarify the payments, if any, to be made to Executive under certain circumstances.


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


1) Notwithstanding anything in
Paragraphs 8 or 9 of the Agreement to the contrary, with respect to any payments due Executive under Paragraph 8 or 9, which relate
to “two (2) times the annual salary” paid to Executive, such payment shall be calculated on the annual base salary
in effect on December 31, 2013. For purposes of clarification, an Executive may receive a salary increase effective in calendar
year 2014, but such increase shall not be included for purposes of calculating payments due Executive under the Agreement.


2) In all other respects the Agreement
is hereby ratified and affirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have set their
hands and seals on the date and year first above written.


 


	UNION CENTER NATIONAL BANK	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By: /s/Anthony C. Weagley	 	/s/James W. Sorge
	Anthony C. Weagley	 	Name: James W.  Sorge
	Its:  President and CEO	 	46 McCurdy Lane
	 	 	Jackson, NJ 08527
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2 - Certification of the Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent
               thereof) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
               to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Pamela M. Reci, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with
the Quarterly Report of Comtrex Systems Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") being filed pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that:

1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)       the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Comtrex Systems Corporation.




                                   By:       /s/ Pamela M. Reci
                                             -----------------------------------

                                             Pamela M. Reci
                                             Chief Accounting Officer
                                             August 13, 2002