alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 39 0- CR EX P AR TE L ay

mon SNY DE R Fr om the 290th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CR-5401 Honora ble Andre w Carr

uthers, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 5, 2009 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON Appellant filed a pretria l a pplication for writ of habe as cor pus seeking a bond re duction. On May 14, 2009, the trial cour

t sig ned an order

deny ing a

ppellant re lief. B ased on the May 14, 2009 order , appellant’ s notice of appeal was due by J une 15, 2009, see T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a) (1), a nd a motion for extension of tim e to file the notice of appea l w as due no later tha n J une 30, 2009. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appe al on J une 29, 2009, and did not file a motion for e x tension of time. Although a

ppellant’s June 29, 2009 notice of appe al was filed within the fifteen- day period provided by

rule 26.3, appellant failed to f ile an extension motion. Be cause it a ppear ed to this court04
- 09
- 00 39 0- CR

- 2- that we did not have ju risdiction over this appea l, se e Sla ton v . S tat e , 9 8 1 S. W. 2 d

2 0 8 , 2 1 0 ( T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ) ( pe r c ur ia m) ; Ol iv o v . S tat e , 918 S.W
. 2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), we order ed appe llant to show ca u s e wh y this appeal should not be dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction. On J uly 27, 2009, appellant’ s attorney responde d by

letter a cknowledg ing tha t the notice of a ppeal was untim e ly f

il e d a n d s tati n g a

p p e ll a n t is u n a

b le to s h o w c a

u s e w h y th is a

p p e a l s h o u ld not be dismiss ed for

lack of jurisdiction. Accor dingly , the appe al is dismis sed for lack of jurisdiction. PER C URI AM

Do No t Pu

bli sh
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Kathleen P. Iverson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey A.
Bertelsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                          | 
| | ------------------------ | 
| | /s/ Kathleen
 P. Iverson | 
| | Kathleen P.
 Iverson    
| | Chief
 Executive Officer
| | August 12,
 2009        

| |                           | 
| | ------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Jeffrey
 A. Bertelsen | 
| | Jeffrey A.
 Bertelsen    
| | Chief
 Financial Officer 
| | August 12,
 2009         

END OF FILING

32

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6231

ALFONSO WARE, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,
v. WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee, and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:07-cv-03799-PMD) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfonso Ware, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alfonso Ware, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Ware that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Ware failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 ( 1985). Ware has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                                    CONSENT
                                      OF
               NISHBALL, CARP, NIEDERMEIER, PACOWTA & CO., P.C.


     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 and related Prospectus Proxy Statement of
Canaan Energy Corporation for registration of 3,830,000 shares of its common
stock and to the use therein of our report dated January 26, 2000, with respect
to the financial statements of Canaan Securities, Inc. included therein.

                    /S/ NISHBALL, CARP, NIEDERMEIER, PACOWTA & CO., P.C.

                    NISHBALL, CARP, NIEDERMEIER, PACOWTA & CO., P.C.


Bridgeport, Connecticut

May 26, 2000
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeAbout UsBiographiesDisplay      BRIGADIER GENERAL PAUL W. NORTONEngage On
        
        BRIGADIER GENERAL PAUL W. NORTONBRIGADIER GENERAL PAUL W. NORTONPaul Weddell Norton was born in Boston, Pa., on February 25, 1909.Following his graduation from the College of William and Mary in 1930, he attended the University of Pittsburgh, graduating in 1933 with a degree in law.Commissioned as a second lieutenant May 7, 1942, he came on active duty with the Air Force 11 days later and has been on continuous service since that date.From 1942 until 1947, General Norton was a personnel staff officer.In September 1947, he was assigned to Hickam AFB, Hawaii, as judge advocate-air depot. He returned to the United States in June 1950, to Westover AFB, Mass., as division judge advocate, a position he held until his reassignment to Washington, D.C., in September 1952.In Washington, he served as chairman, board of review, for five months, and from February 1953 to June 1956, was acting director of civil law.Following a two-year assignment to Langley AFB, Va., as staff judge advocate for Tactical Air Command, General Norton was reassigned to HQ USAFE in September 1958, where he served three years as staff judge advocate for that command.He returned to the United States in November 1961 and in December was assigned as SAC’s staff judge advocate.General Norton’s medals include the Legion of Merit and the Army Commendation Ribbon.(Current as of Dec 1961)
  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 13.2




906 Certification






Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549




Ladies and Gentlemen:




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Andy Yang, the Chief Financial Officer of AU Optronics Corp., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AU Optronics Corp.




Date: March 21, 2014





By:
/s/ Andy YangName:
Andy YangTitle:
Chief Financial Officer








The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Serologicals Corporation and
subsidiaries for the quarter ended March 28, 1999, as set forth in its
Form 10-Q for such quarter and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                           8,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,781
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,164
<PP&E>                                          38,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           246
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,558
<SALES>                                         39,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,532
<CGS>                                           27,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (51)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,551
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE BID OF LAD CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HADDONFIELD-BERLIN ROAD, CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, CAMDEN COUNTY, FEDERAL PROJECT NO. M-4072 (103).

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2290 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2290

  To increase the maximum penalty for unfair and deceptive practices 
      relating to advertising of the costs of air transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2014

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To increase the maximum penalty for unfair and deceptive practices 
      relating to advertising of the costs of air transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Real Transparency in Airfares Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE AIRFARE 
              ADVERTISING PRACTICES.

    Section 46301(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(7) Penalty for Violations of Unfair and Deceptive Airfare 
Advertising Practices.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the maximum 
civil penalty assessed on a person for an unfair or deceptive practice 
in violation of section 41712 and described in section 399.84 of title 
14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar 
regulation or ruling), shall be--
            ``(A) $55,000; or
            ``(B) if the person is an individual or small business 
        concern, $2,500.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2184 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs located in The Dalles, Oregon, as the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans’ Clinic’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 31, 2014 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs located in The Dalles, 

Oregon, as the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans’ 

Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOREN R. KAUFMAN MEMORIAL VETERANS’ 

4 CLINIC. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community based outpatient 

6 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 

7 704 Veterans Drive, The Dalles, Oregon, shall after the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2184 IS

1 date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

2 as the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans’ Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the community based outpatient clinic referred 

6 to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference 

7 to the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman Memorial Veterans’ Clinic’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 16

- 2444

JWAINUS PERRY , Plaintiff, Appellant ,

v.

LUIS S. SPENCER , Commissioner; THOMAS DICKHAUT, Former Superintendent; ANTHONY M. MENDONSA, Former Deputy of Classification; JAMES J. SABA, Superintendent; ABBE NELLIGAN, Deputy of Classification; PATRICK TOOLIN, Correctional Program Officer; KRISTIE LADOUCEUR; CAROL MICI ; THOMAS NEVILLE,

Defendants, Appellees,
JENS SWANSON, Property Officer,

Defendant

.

ERRAT A SHEET
The opinion of this Court, issued on February 21 , 202 4 ,
is amended as follows:

On page 3 , line 9 , change " Corrections " to " Correction "
On page 40, last line of note 15, change "at 25." to "at

note 25."
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00184- CV

Heather A. Stier, A ppellan t

v. Gar y Richard Stier, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 274 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 07- 0874 , H ONO RAB LE R. B RUCE B OY ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Hea ther A. Stier filed a notice of appea l on Marc h 26, 2014, challeng ing an order in
a suit to modify a pare nt-child rela tionship. The rec ord was filed with this Court on May 19, 2014. The Court g rante d motions for ext ensions of time for A ppellant to file her brief, and her brief w as due in this Court on September 17, 2014. On October 2, 2014, afte r Appellant failed to timely file her brief, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter advising her that her brief was overdue and that if she did not file a brief by October 13, 2014, her appea l would be subject to dismiss al for want of prosec ution. The October 13 deadline has passed, and Appellant h as n ei t h er filed a brief nor responde d to the notice. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3( b)._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: De cembe r 2, 2014

2
---

Exhibit 32.2

U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kerry D. Hawkley, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Geothermal
  Inc. (the Company) certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for
        the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (report), which this
        certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                       

Date: June 28, 2006

/s/ Kerry D. Hawkley
  Kerry D. Hawkley 
  Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDING  JUNE 30,  1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFRENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      2,058,494
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,107,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,600
<INVENTORY>                                 6,066,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           11,212,385
<PP&E>                                     15,180,924
<DEPRECIATION>                              4,005,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,802,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,933,247
<BONDS>                                     5,225,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    9,178,645
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,103,483)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               23,802,565
<SALES>                                    36,657,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           36,657,474
<CGS>                                      18,987,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              27,178,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            9,693,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            270,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (484,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (184,667)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (300,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (300,117)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of P2 Solar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Raj-Mohinder S. GurmChief Financial Officer  Date:  August 13, 2012
#### Laurich et al. *v.*Smolic.

(No. 25047

Decided December 19, 1934.)

*Messrs. Hoye, Copperman é De Bard,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. 0., F. Goudy,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Garver, Hart, Stephenson, Williams, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.