alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-85 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|                 |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-85 LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                   
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                               
|                 |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                     
|                 |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                              
|October 28, 2003 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                           
|DATE             |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)
|October 28, 2003 |  | by:  /s/ Michael J. Tuszka                                                                                                                            
|DATE             |  | Michael J. Tuszka,
                  Vice President
                  and Chief Accounting Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer)    

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fast Eddie Racing Stables,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2000 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Glenn A. Little,  Chief  Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 4, 2004                          By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                             ------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fast Eddie Racing  Stables,  Inc. and will be retained by Fast Eddie
Racing Stables,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Millicent S. VEENEMAN, Individually, etc., Appellant, v. CITIZENS FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, etc., et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 31, 1974.

Fielden Woodward, Alvin L. Prichard, Sr., Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, Louisville, Charles F. Mills, Quarles & Mills, South Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Martin Roach, Tarrant, Combs, Blackwell & Bullitt, Louisville, for appellee, Citizens Fidelity Bank and Trust Company.

Squire R. Ogden, James S. Welch, Ogden, Robertson & Marshall, Louisville, for appellees, Robert L. Veeneman, Jr., and Mary K. Veeneman.

John E. Wise, Louisville, for appellees, Carol W. Veeneman and Richard H. Venneman, Infants.

A. Scott Hamilton, Jr., Louisville, for appellee, William J. Graham.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner GARDNER,

Affirming.*
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2265

      To prohibit certain assistance to the Palestinian Authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 2014

     Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
 McConnell, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Coats, Mr. Graham, Mr. Burr, Mr. Roberts, 
Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Toomey, and Mr. Lee) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit certain assistance to the Palestinian Authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stand with Israel Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided under subsection (b) and 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amounts may be obligated 
or expended to provide any direct United States assistance, loan 
guarantee, or debt relief to the Palestinian Authority, or any 
affiliated governing entity or leadership organization.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall have no 
effect for a fiscal year if the President certifies to Congress during 
that fiscal year that the Palestinian Authority has--
            (1) formally recognized the right of Israel to exist as a 
        Jewish state;
            (2) publicly recognized the state of Israel;
            (3) renounced terrorism;
            (4) purged all individuals with terrorist ties from 
        security services;
            (5) terminated funding of anti-American and anti-Israel 
        incitement;
            (6) publicly pledged to not engage in war with Israel; and
            (7) honored previous diplomatic agreements.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The prohibition under section 2 shall take effect on the later of--
            (1) June 1, 2014; or
            (2) the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### JAMES KING, JR. v. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION.

October 3, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on April 15, 2010, American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc., 101 Arc Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63146, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
IIbogaine (7260)
ILysergic acid diethylamide (7315)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IDimethyltryptamine (7435)
I1-[1-(2-Thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine (7470)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
INormorphine (9313)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIAmobarbital (2125)
IIPhencyclidine (7471)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMetazocine (9240)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms) (9273)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IIPhenazocine (9715)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances as radiolabeled compounds for biochemical research. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than November 1, 2010. Dated: August 3, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-21784 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - Order No. 1648

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas*, Georgia Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 26, has requested manufacturing authority on behalf of Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia, Inc., within FTZ 26 Site 11, West Point, Georgia (FTZ Docket 72-2008, filed 12-16-2008);                

*Whereas*, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 79048, 12-24-2008) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                 

*Whereas*, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the                           ( print page 5282)                        examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore*, the Board hereby orders:                

                    The application for manufacturing authority under zone procedures within FTZ 26 on behalf of Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia, Inc., as described in the application and                     **Federal Register**                     notice, is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of January 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-2176 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7376

SUNDARI K. PRASAD, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv
- 00897

- MHL

- RCY )

Submitted : February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous Prasad’s civil rights action against Delta Sigma Theta Sorority , Inc., because the claims raised therein were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. * On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Prasad does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in her informal brief. Thus, Prasad has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v.
Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* The district court dismissed this action after conducting frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


       We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-61034) and
related Prospectus of CSX Corporation and subsidiaries (CSX) for the
registration of $1 billion of securities and to the incorporation by reference
therein of the following:

       (1) our report dated February 9, 2000, except for Note 21 for which the
       date is January 24, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
       statements of CSX as of December 31, 1999 and December 25, 1998, and for
       each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 1999,
       included in its Current Report on Form 8-K, and

       (2) our report dated February 14, 2001, with respect to the consolidated
       financial statements of CSX incorporated by reference in its Annual
       Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2000, and Note 20 to
       CSX's consolidated financial statements included therein,

each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia
May 14, 2001
**Exhibit
      23.1**





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
      333-115833; 333-89642 and 333-89640 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
      No.
      333-139908 on Form S-3 of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiary of our
      reports dated March 13, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial
      statement of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiary, and management's
      assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      and
      the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report
      appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc.
      and
      Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2006.











Crowe
      Chizek and Company LLP





Oak
      Brook, Illinois


March
      13,
      2007
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DOMINICK J. CICALA.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Stanley Singer, Plaintiff, *v.*Slatex, Inc., Defendant.

City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County,

February 1, 1957.

*636
      *Abraham Kaplan*for defendant.

*Frederick Nack*for plaintiff.

James E. Mulcahy, J.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted. The complaint is dismissed. Judgment may be entered accordingly in favor of the defendant. Execution of judgment for costs is stayed for 10 days after service upon the attorney for the plaintiff of notice of entry of judgment.

The agreement between the parties provided: *“*In the event that the Employee shall remain in the employ of the Employer on and after March 1, 1955 without a written agreement between the parties to cover a definite extended period, then and in such event, the employment shall be on the same terms and conditions as herein provided, but terminable, at will, by either party hereto on two (2) weeks’ notice in writing, served upon the other.” And it also provided: “ No provision of this Agreement shall be, changed or modified, nor shall this Agreement be discharged in whole or in part, except by an agreement in writing, signed by the party against whom such change, modification or discharge is claimed or sought to be enforced.” Hence, the alleged oral agreement or understanding upon which the plaintiff relies is not provable (Personal Property Law, § 33-c). It is true that to the extent that it has already been executed by the payments of larger sums ($300 per week instead of $250) the court will leave the parties where it finds them (also in this connection, cf. *McKenzie*v. *Harrison,*120 N. Y. 260), but to the extent that it remains unexecuted it is not enforcible.

Nor has the plaintiff a remedy in *quantum meruit,*the point being that he is firmly bound by the original written agreement and may prove nothing at variance therefrom. He is not in the same position as one who is *bound by no written agreement*but seeks to prove an oral arrangement which is not enforcible. To such a case but not to that in hand the rule of *Elsfelder*v. *Cournand*(270 App. Div. 162) applies. Here there is a binding written agreement.

*637I find here no accord and satisfaction. Indeed, section 33-c of the Personal Property Law would have little meaning or effect if it could be circumvented by executory arrangements such as that which is claimed here. To characterize such an arrangement as an accord and satisfaction is merely an exercise in nomenclature in disregard of the realities. In the face of the written agreement specifically covering his continued employment beyond the period originally specified therein, the plaintiff could not effect a binding change having executory force without another writing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3802748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2645583
<ALLOWANCES>                                    157923
<INVENTORY>                                    5874331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13007226
<PP&E>                                         2909426
<DEPRECIATION>                                  478906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                17652404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         14584029
<BONDS>                                       13631093
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         27282
<OTHER-SE>                                   (10590000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17652404
<SALES>                                       19718732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19718732
<CGS>                                         14223498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5157753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 337481
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             338981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    338981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUAN**
**T      TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 1, 2006 | /s/                Thomas Elliott                                  |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Thomas                ElliotChief                Executive Officer |
|                               |                                                               |
|                               | /s/                Jean LeRoy                                      |
|                               | Jean                LeRoyChief                Financial Officer    |

----