alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23







**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-112420) of our report dated March 3, 2007, included in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December
      31, 2006.




/s/ **BKD,** **LLP**




Decatur,
      Illinois


March
      3,
      2007














**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-112420) of our report dated January 21, 2005, included in the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2004.







Champaign,
      Illinois


March
      21,
      2007
Exhibit 99.2


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, AT&T Wireless Services Note-Backed Series 2002-7 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
         servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
         Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 29, 2004



         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
-----------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President



                                      8
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40188

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARY LEWIS MALONSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(4:97-CR-64-1)

November 24, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Malonson appeals his sentence entered after he pled guilty to

violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). In

particular, Mal onson contends that the district court erred in

calculating h is offense level by relying upon information he

divulged, after executing a plea agreement, about the quantity of

drugs involved in the conspiracy. According to Malonson, the

district court’s use of this information violated U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8.

Malonson’s claim that the terms of his plea agreement were not

honored distills down to an objection about the district court’s2

determination of the quantity of drugs implicated in the crime, a

finding of fact we review under the clea rly erroneous standard.

See United States v. Gibson , 48 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 1995),

cert. denied

, 516 U.S. 852 (1995). Though Malonson argues that he

provided the probation officer with all the details concerning the

amount of drugs involved in his illegal activities, the probation

officer stated in the presentence report that he only relied upon

the statements given by Malonson’s co-conspirators in making his

drug qu antity calculation. In addition, the probation officer

averred that Malonson refused to discuss the quantity of drugs

involved in his operation. Since Malonson points to no evidence

demon strating its inaccuracy, the district court was entitled to

rely upon the PSR. S ee United States v. Franklin , 148 F.3d 451,

460 (5th Cir. 1998) (“Absent rebuttal evidence demonstrating

inaccuracy, which evidence the defendant bears the bu rden of

producing, district courts are entitled to rely on PSRs.”). Because

none of the drug-quantity information used to calculate t he base

offense level came fromMalonson, “the district court’s

determination that § 1B1.8 was not violated will not be disturbed.”

Gibson , 48 F.3d at 879.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                       680
<INVENTORY>                                     24,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,457
<PP&E>                                         270,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               455,630
<CGS>                                          370,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  424,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,509
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 17, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00394

- CV

Valerie E. Steele, Appellant

v.

Victor Biles, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO OD WIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on May 28, 2015. Having reviewed

the record , the Court holds that Valerie E. Steele has not prosecuted her appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for

want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court

and in the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2121

             To repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2014

  Mr. Walsh (for himself, Mr. Begich, and Mr. Tester) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repeal REAL ID Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TITLE II OF THE REAL ID ACT OF 2005.

    Title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (division B of Public Law 109-
13; 49 U.S.C. 30301 note) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

CALHOUN, BLAIR & ASSOCIATES

PETROLEUM
CONSULTANTS

4625 GREENVILLE AVENUE, SUITE 102

DALLAS, TEXAS 75206

(214)-522-4925

FACSIMILE: (214) 346-0310

RGBLAIR@SWBELL.NET

February 28, 2008

Dorchester Minerals, L.P.

3838 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 300

Dallas, TX 75219

Gentlemen:

As independent petroleum consultants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-124544) of
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. of our estimates of reserves, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to all references to our firm included in this Annual Report.



CALHOUN, BLAIR & ASSOCIATES/S/ ROBERT G. BLAIR, P.E.Robert G. Blair, P.E.President
EXHIBIT 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report



The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by HSBC Automotive Trust, Series 2001-3has been conductedby HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated October 9, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,management's assertion thatthe servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation,successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation,as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated October 9, 2001, as supplemented,as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.



/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005



Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust Series 2001-3 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated October 9, 2001, as supplemented.







|/s/ Steve Smith 
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 



|/s/ Joan Coppenrath
Joan Coppenrath
Controller
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2005
Date | /s/ Craig Peters
Craig Peters
Group Director - Asset Management
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2005
Date
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2323 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Fathers Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS OF CERTAIN 
              PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR DECEASED VETERANS.

    Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and inserting the following:
                    ``(F) the parent of an individual who lost his or 
                her life under honorable conditions while serving in 
                the armed forces during a period named by paragraph 
                (1)(A) of this section, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse;
                    ``(G) the parent of a service-connected permanently 
                and totally disabled veteran, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse; and''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate September 10, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.
```
##### 



Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:
    
    March 16, 2006/s/ Peter Munk

Peter MunkChairman and Chief Executive OfficerTrizec Canada Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 231

To reauthorize the Multinational Species Conservation Funds Semipostal 
                                 Stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2013

 Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Multinational Species Conservation Funds Semipostal 
                                 Stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Multinational Species Conservation 
Funds Semipostal Stamp Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2(c)(2) of the Multinational Species Conservation Funds 
Semipostal Stamp Act of 2010 (39 U.S.C. 416 note) is amended by 
striking ``2 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------


                CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 22, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Scottish
Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Second Amended and
Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plan, and the Harbourton
Employee Options.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG

Ernst & Young
George Town, Grand Cayman
British West Indies
December 6, 2000
#### Thomas S. SWEENEY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

July 31, 1973.

Anthony M. Wilhoit, David E. Murrell, Frankfort, for appellant.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Robert L. Chenoweth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Affirming.*
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                                    OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of National Investment Managers Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2007                        /s/ Steven Ross
                                          --------------------------
                                          Steven Ross
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ John M. Davis
Dated: May 15, 2007                       ----------------------------
                                          John M. Davis
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21511]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, September 1, 2010; 11 a.m.-12 Noon.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance Status Report.
    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: August 24, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21511 Filed 8-25-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE COX.

November 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of National Investment Managers Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 15, 2010
              /s/ Steven J. RossSteven
      J. RossChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      November 15, 2010
              /s/ Christopher W.
LarkinChristopher
      W. LarkinChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-KSB) of Botetourt Bankshares,
Inc. (the Company), we, H. Watts Steger, III, Chief Executive Officer and Michelle A. Alexander, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



| | (a) | the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Form 10-KSB.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ H. Watts Steger, III

Date: December 29, 2005H. Watts Steger, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/ Michelle A. AlexanderMichelle A. AlexanderChief Financial Officer