T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CARL OS ENRI QU E GON ZALE ZE R AZ O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71240 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 938- 508 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a r l os E nr i que G onz a l e z - E r a z o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons p r o s e f o rr e v ie w o f

th e d e c is io n o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls , d e n y in g h is



# FI LED MA Y03 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71240 2 appl i c a t i ons f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A gai nstT orture. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e a n dw ill up h o ldth e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in a tio n u n le s s th e e v id e n c e c o m p e ls ac o n tr a ryc o n c lu s io n . Se e I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 5 0 2 U .S . 4 7 8 , 4 8 1 ( 1 9 9 2 ) . W e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. G on za l ez -E ra zo cont ends thathe suff er ed pastpers ec ut i on w hen g uerr i l l as threa t ened hi m , and h e f ears future pers ec ut i on fr om gang s. P et i t i on ert es t i fi ed that h e w as n o t h arm ed b y th e g u er il las. S ub stan ti al ev id en ce su p p o rts th e a g en cy ’s de t e rm i na t i on tha tpe t i t i one rf a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h pa s tpe r s e c ut i on. Se e Li m v . I NS , 224 F . 3d 929, 936 ( 9th C i r . 2000) . I n a ddi t i on, pe t i t i one r ’ s s pe c ul a t i ve f e arof future gang act i vi ty and pers ec ut i on do es no tse rve a s abasi s f or as ylum re l i ef

. See Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 54 2 F . 3d 73 8, 74 5-46 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). B e c aus e G onz a l e z - E r a z o f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um , he n e c e s s a r ilyf

a ile dto m e e t th e m o r e s tr in g e n t s tan d ar df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se pet i t i on erdi d n otes t abl i sh thati tw as m ore l i kel y than n otthathe w i l l be t ortured b yo rw ith th e a c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e G u a te m a lan g o v e rn m e n t. See Si laya v.10- 71240 3 Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 6 6 , 1 0 7 3 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 8 ). C o n trary to G o n za lez- E ra zo ’s cont ent i on , the B IA prov i ded a suff i ci entexpl anat i on for denyi ng C A T re l i ef . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rG onz a l e z - E r a z o’ s c l a i m tha the s houl d be gr a nt e d a s y l um ba s e d on hum a ni t ar i an r e a s ons be c aus e he f a i l e d t o r a i s e tha ti s s ue b efo re th e B IA , an dth ereb y fai l edt o ex h au sth i s ad m i n i strat i v e rem ed i es. See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o

ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.