alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3020
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               97
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    77
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (55)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (55)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (55)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. McKENZIE

No. 209P01

Case below: 142 N.C. App. 392

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 May 2001.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 17, 2017

p05 1 0 

# Order

Clerk May 17, 2017

154527

COALITION PROTECTING AUTO NO

- FAULT,

MARTHA E. LEVANDOWSKI, GERALD E.

CLARK, MARY ELLEN CLARK, A. MICHAEL

DELLER, PAULINA M. DELLER, and M.

THOMAS DELLER,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF

MICHIGAN, ILENE IKENS, RICHARD IKENS,

KENNETH WISSER, SUSAN WISSER,

GREGORY WOLFE, and KAREN WOLFE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 154527

COA: 314310

Ingham CC: 12

- 000068

- CZ

MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2016

judgment of the Court of App eals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

B ERNSTEIN , J., would grant leave to appeal.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-60880

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ZORAN MATIC,

Petitioner,

versus

JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney

General,

Respondent.

_________________________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A72 446 565

_________________________________________________________________

October 6, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Zoran Matic has filed a petition for review of an order of

removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The

respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of

jurisdiction is GRANTED. Lopez-Elias v. Reno, 209 F.3d 788, 790

n.1 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. July 28, 2000)

(No. 00-164); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). Matic’s motions for bail

pending appeal and to adduce additional evidence are DENIED.

PETITION DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





INVISA,
INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Invisa, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edmund C. King, Acting
President and Acting Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/Edmund C.
King


________________________________


Edmund C.
King


Acting
President


March 31,
2010
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

October 6, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 03-30449

Summary Calendar

_____________________ IN RE: COSSETTA WARD; DERRICK WARD,

Debtors.

COSSETTA WARD; DERRICK WARD,

Appellants,

versus

BATON ROUGE NEONATAL ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No.: 03-CV-188-A

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cosetta and Derrick Ward appeal the judgment of the district

court affirming judgment of the bankruptcy court, which denied the

Wards a d ischarge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2) and (5), and

held that, as to Cosetta Wa rd, the debt to Baton Rouge Neonatal

Associates was non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). The

district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s judgment because it

was impossible for the court to determine whether the bankruptcy

court’s factual findings we re clearly erroneous, inasmuch as theWards failed to include a transcript of the trial in the bankruptcy

court in the record on appeal. The Wards argue that the district

court’s judgment was biased because it gave no weight to the their

trial testimony, and that the district court violated their rights

to due process and equal protection because it did not ascertain

why a trial transcript was not ordered

-- they claim, for the first

time on appeal, that they lacked financial resources to pay for a

transcript.

Because a trial transcript was not made a part of the record

on appeal, it was impossible for the district court to give weight

to the Wards’ trial testimony. The district court’s failure to

inquire about the reason why the transcri pt was not part of the

record did not violate the Wards’ due process and equal protection

rights. The Wards did not seek leave to proceed i n forma pauperis

or request a transcript at public expense.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court

is A FFIRMED, essentially for the reasons stated by the district

court.

A F F I R M E D.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 2146-126]


Alabama Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

August 24, 2010.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed an application submitted by Alabama 
Power Company (licensee) for non-project use of project lands and 
waters at the Coosa River Project (FERC No. 2146). An environmental 
assessment (EA) has been prepared as part of staff's review of the 
proposal. The proposed use would be located on Logan Martin Lake in 
Talladega County, Alabama.
    In the application, the licensee proposes to issue all Shoreline 
Real Estate, LLC, to install recreational facilities for use by 
residents of the Lincoln Harbor development. The proposed facilities 
would consist of 15 floating, cluster docks accommodating a total of 
176 watercraft, one concrete boat ramp, 2 wooden boardwalks, 2 asphalt-
paved walking trails, and 2 wooden bridges. The applicant would also 
construct a paved parking lot and concrete loading pier, the majority 
of both to be located outside the project boundary. The loading pier 
will service a dry storage facility located outside of the project 
boundary. The EA contains Commission staff's analysis of the probable 
environmental impacts of the proposed action and concludes that 
approval of the proposal would not constitute a major federal action 
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order Modifying 
and Approving Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters,'' which was 
issued August 24, 2010, and is available for review and reproduction at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, 
NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``elibrary'' 
link. Enter the docket number (P-2146) in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="490f0c1b0a06272520272c1a3c3939263b3d092f2c3b2a672e263f">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, or for TTY, 
(202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21623 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 16-2444

JWAINUS PERRY,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

LUIS S. SPENCER, Commissioner; THOMAS DICKHAUT, Former 

Superintendent; ANTHONY M. MENDONSA, Former Deputy of 

Classification; JAMES J. SABA, Superintendent; ABBE NELLIGAN, 

Deputy of Classification; PATRICK TOOLIN, Correctional Program 

Officer; KRISTIE LADOUCEUR; CAROL MICI; THOMAS NEVILLE,

Defendants, Appellees,

JENS SWANSON, Property Officer,

Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on February 21, 2024, 

is amended as follows:

On page 3, line 9, change "Corrections" to "Correction"

On page 40, last line of note 15, change "at 25." to "at 

note 25."
#### FOREIGN AUTO PREPARATION SERVICE, INC. v. NEW JERSEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2006 of Rurban Financial Corp.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2006/s/ Duane L. Sinn
Duane L. SinnExecutive Vice President &Chief Financial Officer
 41
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of National Investment Managers Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2009
                    /s/
      Steven J. RossSteven
      J. RossChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      May 15, 2009
                    /s/
      Christopher W. LarkinChristopher
      W. LarkinChief
      Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2205 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2205

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small 
businesses from the employer health insurance mandate and to modify the 
     definition of full-time employee for purposes of such mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 2014

Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Portman, Mr. Risch, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Scott, 
and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small 
businesses from the employer health insurance mandate and to modify the 
     definition of full-time employee for purposes of such mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Fairness in Health 
Care Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON APPLICATION OF EMPLOYER HEALTH INSURANCE 
              MANDATE.

    (a) Exception for Small Business Concerns.--Section 4980H(c)(2) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Exception for small business concerns.--The 
                term `applicable large employer' shall not include any 
                employer which is a small business concern (within the 
                meaning of section 3 of the Small Business Act).''.
    (b) Definition of Full-Time Employee.--Section 4980H(c) of such 
Code is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(E), by striking ``by 120'' and 
        inserting ``by 174'', and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``30 hours'' and 
        inserting ``40 hours''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PABLO SMITH.

November 22, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         000770471
<NAME>                        VENTURES-NATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       590,222
<OTHER-SE>                                    (590,338)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (116)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7139]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Pre-Raphaelite Lens: British Photography and Painting, 1848-1875,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about October 31, 2010, until on or about January 30, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: August 23, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-21581 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0273

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ROBERT KINGSLEY TAYLOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 20, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2023

02/08/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0273