52982 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on May 18, 2010, applicable 

to workers of BlueScope Buildings 

North America, Laurinburg, North 

Carolina. The notice was published in 

the Federal Register on June 7, 2010 (75 

FR 32224). 

At the request of the State Agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in activities related 

to prefabricated metal building 

components. 

New information shows that some 

workers separated from employment at 

BlueScope Buildings North America 

had their wages reported through a 

separate unemployment insurance (UI) 

tax account under the name Butler 

Manufacturing Company, a division of 

BlueScope Buildings North America. 

Accordingly, the Department is 

amending this certification to properly 

reflect this matter. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

the subject firm who were adversely 

affected by a shift in the production of 

prefabricated metal building 

components to Mexico. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–73,758 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of BlueScope Buildings North 

America, including workers whose 

unemployment insurance (UI) wages are 

reported through Butler Manufacturing 

Company, Laurinburg, North Carolina, who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after March 19, 2009, 

through May 18, 2012, and all workers in the 

group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of 

August, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21399 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,784] 

Chrysler Group LLC, Formally Known 

as Chrysler LLC, Kenosha Engine 

Plant, Including On-Site Leased 

Workers From Caravan Knight 

Facilities Management LLC and 

Syncreon, Kenosha, WI; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on September 2, 2009, 

applicable to workers of Chrysler Group 

LLC, formally known as Chrysler, LLC, 

Kenosha Engine Plant, Kenosha, 

Wisconsin. The notice was published in 

the Federal Register on November 5, 

2009 (74 FR 57340). The notice was 

amended on May 10, 2010 to include 

on-site leased workers from Caravan 

Knight Facilities Management LLC. The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on June 16, 2010 (75 FR 34170– 

34171). 

At the request of the state, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in activities in 

production of V–6 automobile engines. 

The company reports that workers 

leased from Syncreon were employed 

on-site at the Kenosha, Wisconsin 

location of Chrysler Group LLC, 

formally known as Chrysler, LLC, 

Kenosha Engine Plant. 

The Department has determined that 

these workers were sufficiently under 

the control of the subject firm to be 

considered leased workers. Based on 

these findings, the Department is 

amending this certification to include 

workers leased from Sycreon working 

on-site at the Kenosha Engine Plant. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–70,784 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers at Chrysler Group LLC, 

formally known as Chrysler, LLC, Kenosha 

Engine Plant, including on-site leased 

workers from Caravan Knight Facilities 

Management LLC and Syncreon, Kenosha, 

Wisconsin, who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after May 

27, 2008, through September 2, 2011, and all 

workers in the group threatened with total or 

partial separation from employment on the 

date of certification through two years from 

the date of certification, are eligible to apply 

for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of 

August, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21397 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of August 9, 2010 

through August 13, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52983 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) the petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1- year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,956 ............. Jasper Chair Company ........................................... Jasper, IN ................................................................ November 19, 2008. 

73,302 ............. Wolfe Dye & Bleach Works, Inc ............................. Shoemakersville, PA ............................................... January 7, 2009. 

73,587 ............. ArcelorMittal Weirton, Inc., Leased Workers from 

The Hudson Company.

Weirton, WV ............................................................ February 26, 2009. 

74,001 ............. Connextions, Inc., Sprint Operating Unit ................ Concord, NC ........................................................... April 20, 2009. 

74,460 ............. Sing Fei, Inc ............................................................ San Francisco, CA .................................................. July 24, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,734 ............. Nukote International, Inc ......................................... Rochester, NY ......................................................... October 30, 2008. 

72,896 ............. Staffmark, Working On Site at Leach International Buena Park, CA ...................................................... November 18, 2008. 

72,936 ............. Current Medicine Group, LLC, Springs 

Science+Business Media Finance, Inc.

Philadelphia, PA ...................................................... November 19, 2008. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
52984 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,450 ............. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Employee Reporting to Woodland Park, NJ.Woodland Park, NJ ................................................. January 29, 2009. 

73,450A ........... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Winona, MN ............................................................ January 29, 2009. 

73,450B ........... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Greenville, TX ......................................................... January 29, 2009. 

73,450C .......... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc..

Piedmont, SC .......................................................... January 29, 2009. 

73,450D .......... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Anaheim, CA ........................................................... January 29, 2009. 

73,450E ........... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Havre De Grace, MD .............................................. January 29, 2009. 

73,450F ........... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Smyrna, GA ............................................................. January 29, 2009. 

73,450G .......... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Westwego, LA ......................................................... January 29, 2009. 

73,450H .......... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Mount Pleasant, TN ................................................ January 29, 2009. 

73,450I ............ Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Stamford, CT ........................................................... January 29, 2009. 

73,450J ........... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

North Augusta, SC .................................................. January 29, 2009. 

73,450K ........... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, 

etc.

Tempe, AZ .............................................................. January 29, 2009. 

73,513 ............. Farley’s and Sathers Candy Company, Inc., Onsite Leased Workers from Doherty Staffing Solutions.Round Lake, MN ..................................................... February 17, 2009. 

73,577 ............. Aigis Mechtronics, Inc., A Subsidiary of Nortek, 

Inc., Leased Workers of Adecco Employment 

Services.

Winston-Salem, NC ................................................. February 22, 2009. 

73,635 ............. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations, 

etc., Off-Site Workers Reporting to St. Louis, 

MO.

St. Louis, MO .......................................................... February 24, 2009. 

73,635A ........... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

St. Charles, MO ...................................................... February 24, 2009. 

73,635B ........... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Hazelwood, MO ....................................................... February 24, 2009. 

73,753 ............. Lodging by Liberty, Inc., Brown Jordan International, Inc.; BJI Employee Services; etc.Liberty, NC .............................................................. March 15, 2009. 

73,775 ............. Eli Lilly and Company, Chemical Process Research and Development Pilot Plant.Indianapolis, IN ....................................................... March 22, 2009. 

73,796 ............. Keane, Inc., Teachers Insurance Annuity Association—College Retirement Equities Fund.Denver, CO ............................................................. March 26, 2009. 

73,806 ............. Multina, USA ........................................................... Plattsburgh, NY ....................................................... March 18, 2009. 

73,849 ............. LTX–Credence Corporation, Leased Workers from 

ATR International, Inc.

Hillsboro, OR ........................................................... March 16, 2009. 

73,878 ............. HNTB Corporation, HNTB Holding, LTD., Accounting Department.Kansas City, MO ..................................................... April 1, 2009. 

73,917 ............. Stanadyne Corporation, Pencil Nozzel Injector Division, Leased Workers from Pro-Type.Jacksonville, NC ...................................................... April 13, 2009. 

74,012 ............. GM Powertrain Defiance CET, General Motors ..... Defiance, OH ........................................................... April 14, 2009. 

74,058 ............. Pentel of America, Ltd., Manufacturing Division ..... Torrance, CA ........................................................... May 6, 2009. 

74,112 ............. Edwards Vacuum, Inc., Leased Workers from 

Manpower and Kforce.

Tewksbury, MA ....................................................... May 17, 2009. 

74,140 ............. Sweater Project Corp .............................................. North Bergen, NJ .................................................... May 11, 2009. 

74,223 ............. White’s Metal Works, Inc ........................................ Bassett, VA ............................................................. June 10, 2009. 

74,293 ............. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Long Beach, CA ...................................................... June 7, 2009. 

74,293A ........... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Anaheim, CA ........................................................... June 7, 2009. 

74,293B ........... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

El Segundo, CA ...................................................... June 7, 2009. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52985 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,293C .......... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Huntington Beach, CA ............................................ June 7, 2009. 

74,293D .......... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Irvine, CA ................................................................ June 7, 2009. 

74,293E ........... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Lemoore, CA ........................................................... June 7, 2009. 

74,293F ........... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & 

Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

Seal Beach, CA ....................................................... June 7, 2009. 

74,348 ............. The TriZetto Group, Inc., Leased Workers from 

Syntel Limited, Inforonics, LLC, etc.

Greenwood Village, CO .......................................... July 1, 2009. 

74,354 ............. HSBC Card Services, Inc., HSBC North American 

Holdings, Security and Fraud Dept., etc.

Tulsa, OK ................................................................ June 18, 2009. 

74,381 ............. Quiksilver Americas, Quiksliver Screenprint Operations, Leased Workers from Rainmaker Staffing.Huntington Beach, CA ............................................ May 8, 2010. 

74,391 ............. Travelers Indemnity Company, Claims Services, 

Workers’ Compensation Subrogation.

Wyomissing, PA ...................................................... July 13, 2009. 

74,394 ............. Laserwords U.S., Inc., Laserwords Private LTD, 

Leased Workers from Kelly Services.

Lewiston, ME ........................................................... June 11, 2009. 

74,433 ............. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement.Hartford, CT ............................................................ July 26, 2009. 

74,441 ............. Hagemeyer North America, El Paso Branch .......... El Paso, TX ............................................................. July 19, 2009. 

74,442 ............. Hagemeyer North America, Mcallen Branch .......... McAllen, TX ............................................................. July 19, 2009. 

74,443 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department, Off-Site Teleworker Bryan Martin.Denver, CO ............................................................. July 19, 2009. 

74,443A ........... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Collinsville, VA ........................................................ July 19, 2009. 

74,443B ........... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Decatur, IL ............................................................... July 19, 2009. 

74,443C .......... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Jonesboro, AR ........................................................ July 19, 2009. 

74,443D .......... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Mansfield, OH ......................................................... July 19, 2009. 

74,443E ........... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Lynchburg, VA ......................................................... July 19, 2009. 

74,443F ........... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Enid, OK .................................................................. July 19, 2009. 

74,443G .......... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Grand Junction, CO ................................................ July 19, 2009. 

74,457 ............. Leach International, Esterline Technologies, 

Leased Workers from Ultimate Staffing Service, 

etc.

Buena Park, CA ...................................................... July 22, 2009. 

74,461 ............. Providence Chain Company, Leased Workers 

from Microtech Staffing Group and Occupations 

Unlimited.

Providence, RI ......................................................... July 30, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,886 ............. Turner Techtronics, Inc ........................................... Burbank, CA ............................................................ November 17, 2008. 

73,165 ............. James Hamilton Construction Company, Tyrone 

Mine.

Silver City, NM ........................................................ December 23, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,431 ............. Milliken & Company, Apparel Division .................... Barnwell, SC ........................................................... January 19, 2009. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,283 ............. International Business Machines (IBM), Global 

Technology Services Delivery Division, Massachusetts Teleworkers.

Endicott, NY.


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
52986 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,283A ........... International Business Machines (IBM), Domino 

Server Application Development Team, etc., 

Massachusetts Teleworkers.

Endicott, NY.

74,256 ............. Ferragon Corporation, Ferrous Metal Processing 

Company.

Brooklyn, OH ...........................................................

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,842 ............. Nabors Well Services, Ltd., Nabors Industries, Ltd San Angelo, TX.

72,971 ............. ASC Machine Tools, Inc ......................................... Spokane Valley, WA.

73,101 ............. Tyler Pipe Company, Soil/Plumbing Division, North 

Plant.

Tyler, TX.

73,110 ............. Robin Industries, Inc., Cleveland Manufacturing .... Cleveland, OH.

73,374 ............. Marshalltown Company ........................................... Marshalltown, IA.

73,413 ............. Unit Structures, LLC ................................................ Magnolia, AR.

73,717 ............. Aperto Networks, Inc., Operations Department ...... Milpitas, CA.

73,723 ............. FirstSolutions, Claims Processing Center .............. Two Harbors, MN.

73,863 ............. SuperMedia, LLC, FKA Idearc Media, LLC, 

Supermedia Information Services, LLC 

Bensalem, PA.

73,950 ............. Auto Builders, Inc .................................................... Ladson, SC.

74,021 ............. Diagnostic Staffing Services, LLC .......................... Pittsburgh, PA.

74,281 ............. Humana Insurance Company, Carenetwork, Inc .... Green Bay, WI.

74,321 ............. Beloit Health Systems/Beloit Clinic, The Health Information Management Transcription Department.Beloit, WI.

74,362 ............. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Operations, Inc York, PA.

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

72,463 ............. Draexlmaier Automotive of America, LLC .............. Duncan, SC.

72,771 ............. HMC Technologies .................................................. New Albany, MS.

73,827 ............. Architectural Glazing Technologies, On-site 

Leased Workers Bonney Staffing.

Sanford, ME.

74,273 ............. Doyle and Roth Manufacturing Company, Inc ........ Simpson, PA.

74,383 ............. Blen-Col, Inc., DBA L&A Molding (Hudson Color 

Concentrates).

Leominster, MA.

74,451 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Off-Site Worker ........................ Denver, CO.

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,589 ............. DuPont Performance Coatings, E.I. Dupont De 

Nemours Company OEM.

Fenton, MO.

74,092 ............. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Employees.Winona, MN.

74,093 ............. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division.Greenville, TX.

74,094 ............. Cytec Carbon Fibers, LLC, Corporate Service Division.Piedmont, SC.

74,095 ............. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division.Anaheim, CA.

74,096 ............. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division.Havre de Grace, MD.

74,097 ............. Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service 

Division.

Smyrna, GA.


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52987 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,098 ............. Building Block Chemicals, Corporate Service Division.Westwego, LA.

74,099 ............. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division Mount Pleasant, TN.

74,100 ............. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division Stamford, CT.

74,101 ............. Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service 

Division.

North Augusta, SC.

74,102 ............. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division.Tempe, AZ.

74,216 ............. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement.Moosic, PA.

74,444 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Collinsville, VA.

74,445 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Decatur, IL.

74,446 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Jonesboro, AR.

74,447 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Mansfield, OH.

74,448 ............. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Lynchburg, VA.

74,449 ............. StarTek USA, Inc .................................................... Enid, OK.

74,450 ............. StarTek USA, Inc .................................................... Grand Junction, CO.

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the Department issued a 

negative determination on petitions 

related to the relevant investigation 

period applicable to the same worker 

group. The duplicative petitions did not 

present new information or a change in 

circumstances that would result in a 

reversal of the Department’s previous 

negative determination, and therefore, 

further investigation would duplicate 

efforts and serve no purpose. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,844 ............. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. .................................... Waterford, MI ..........................................................

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of August 9, 

2010 through August 13, 2010. Copies of 

these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA 

Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: August 19, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21394 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221 (a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than September 9, 2010. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, at the address 

shown below, not later than September 

9, 2010. 

Copies of these petitions may be 

requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act. Requests may be 

submitted by fax, courier services, or 

mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office 

of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of 

August 2010. 

Michael Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

APPENDIX—TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 8/9/10 AND 8/13/10 

TA–W Subject firm 

(petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of 

petition 

74496 ................ Hallmark Cards, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ................................ Kansas City, MO ................... 08/09/10 08/02/10 

74497 ................ Deluxe Digital Studios, Inc. (Workers) ................................. Moosic, PA ............................ 08/09/10 06/28/10 

74498 ................ Detroit Terminal (State/One-Stop) ........................................ Detroit, MI ............................. 08/11/10 07/08/10 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES