alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION*





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Rurban Financial Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Duane
      L. Sinn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Duane
              L.
              SinnPrint
                Name: Duane L. SinnTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)Date:
                August 13, 2008




*
      This
      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section
      1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be
      deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed
      to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
      specifically incorporates it by reference into any such filing.
#### Fred F. Emden, Plaintiff, v. Martin Automatic Fishing Reel Company, Inc., Defendant.

County Court, Herkimer County,

June 24, 1957.

*John Bergin*for plaintiff.

*Kernan S Kernan*for defendant.

Edmund A. McCarthy, J.

The plaintiff moves to strike from the amended answer under rule 103 of the Civil Practice Act, certain paragraphs numbered six, seven, eight, and nine.

The defendant presents a cross motion for summary judgment, asking for a dismissal of the complaint of the plaintiff.

The facts are set out in the pleadings, and examination before trial and moving papers, so far as the record in this case now shows.

The complaint alleges specific services, which are denied upon information and belief in the amended answer, so an issue of fact is presented to be heard by a jury.

*349Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.

Section 10.2 (Y) of Treasury Department Circular Number 230, governs an “enrolled person” practicing before the Treasury Department.

Plaintiff is not such an “ enrolled person.”

Nothing in the record shows that the plaintiff represented the defendant before a Treasury Department hearing.

Reference is made to conferences with a “ Treasury Agent ” or field representative. Surely this does not require “ enrollment.”

The conclusory allegations of paragraphs eight and nine of the amended answer are not borne out by the record, as a matter of law.

This case is distinguishable from *Matter of New York County Lawyers Assn. (Bercu)*(273 App. Div. 524, affd. 299 N. Y. 728). Here the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, to post their bookkeeping books, and in 1953, rendered accounting of services on the books of the defendant for some 11 months. And in 1954, from the rendition of these services in accounting, a refund of some tax money resulted.

The application of legal knowledge in such work, however, is only incidental to the accounting functions. *(Matter of New York County Lawyers Assn. [Bercu],*273 App. Div. 524, 532.)

Accordingly, the defendant’s cross motion is hereby denied and the plaintiff’s motion is granted, with $10 motion costs to abide the event.

Order accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2195 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2195

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2014

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To deny admission to the United States to any representative to the 
  United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage 
activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses 
         a threat to United States national security interests.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VISA LIMITATION FOR CERTAIN REPRESENTATIVES TO THE UNITED 
              NATIONS.

    Section 407(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1990 and 1991 (8 U.S.C. 1102 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``such individual has been found to have 
        been engaged in espionage activities'' and inserting the 
        following: ``such individual--
            ``(1) has been found to have been engaged in espionage 
        activities or a terrorist activity (as defined in section 
        212(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
        U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(iii)))''; and
            (2) by striking ``allies and may pose'' and inserting the 
        following: ``allies; and
            ``(2) may pose''.

            Passed the Senate April 7, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Having considered appellant's brief, appellant's pro se appeal 

statement, the record on appeal, and appellant's appendix, we conclude 

that the district court abused its discretion in awarding the maternal 

grandmother custody of the two children. See Wallace v. Wallace, 112 

Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996) (providing that this court 

reviews a child custody decision for an abuse of discretion). First, the 

district court could not award custody to her because she never moved to 

intervene in the action, and thus, she was not a party to the action. See 

Young v. Nev. Title Co., 103 Nev. 436, 442, 744 P.2d 902, 905 (1987) 

(providing that "[a] court does not have jurisdiction to enter judgment for 

or against one who is not a party to the action"); Landry v. Nauls, 831 

S.W.2d 603, 605-06 (Tex. App. 1992) (explaining that a court cannot award 

custody to a nonparent unless that nonparent has brought an action for 

custody or has sought to intervene in the custody action). Second, the 

district court violated appellant's procedural due process rights by 

awarding custody to the maternal grandmother when appellant had no 

notice that the grandmother was going to testify at the hearing or was 

going to be considered as a custodial placement option, and when 

appellant did not have an opportunity to present evidence concerning 

whether placement with the grandmother was in the children's best 

interest. See Gonzales-Alpizar v. Griffith, 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 2, 317 P.3d 

820, 827 (2014) (providing that due process requires reasonable notice and 

an opportunity to present objections). 

Lastly, the district court did not make specific findings that 

awarding custody to either parent would be detrimental to the children 

and the award of custody to the maternal grandmother was in the 

children's best interest. See NRS 125.500(1) (requiring that before a court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A ea 
Saitta 

Gibbons 

awards custody to a nonparent, the court must find that "an award of 

custody to a parent would be detrimental to the child and the award to a 

nonparent is required to serve the best interest of the child"). Accordingly, 

we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with 

this order. 2 

Pickering 

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court 

Hon. Gerald W. Hardcastle, Senior Judge 

Pecos Law Group 

Lisa Rochelle Smith 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2To the extent appellant's additional arguments are not addressed 

by this order, we conclude they lack merit. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A e
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 171 (Friday, September 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 54092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21574]



[[Page 54092]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1700]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status: CNH America, LLC 
(Agricultural Equipment Manufacturing); Grand Island, Nebraska

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Lincoln Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 59, 
has made application to the Board for authority to establish a special-
purpose subzone at the agricultural combine and hay tools manufacturing 
and distribution facilities of CNH America, LLC (CNH), located in Grand 
Island, Nebraska (FTZ Docket 11-2010, filed 2/16/2010);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 8652, 2/25/2010) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest.
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to the manufacturing and distribution of 
agricultural combines and hay tools at the facilities of CNH America, 
LLC, located in Grand Island, Nebraska (Subzone 59B), as described in 
the application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of August 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21574 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JONATHAN RIVERA,

Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 494 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of February, 2022
, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED

. The issue as stated by petitioner is :

Whether prejudice is presumed from the improper use at trial of post

- arrest, post

Miranda silence, requiring the Commonwealth to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the verdict

— or whether, as the Superior Court held, the standard that governs the use of pre

- arrest silence, from which prejudice is not presumed, also gov erns constitutional harmless error from the improper use of post

- arrest, post

- Miranda silence?
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cosi, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2003, of the
Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Kevin Armstrong
    -------------------------
Kevin Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Investors
First Staged Equity L.P. 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768834
<NAME> INVESTORS FIRST STAGED EQUITY L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       99
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          51,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         46,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,529)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,934
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,913
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (29.14)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                        MONTHLY SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                             FIRST USA BANK, N.A.


                       BANC ONE CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
                                 SERIES 1996-A



     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First USA Bank, N.A.,
as Servicer ("First USA"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of November 1, 1994 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"), as
supplemented by the Series 1996-A Supplement dated as of March 27, 1996 (as
amended and supplemented, the"Series Supplement"), between First USA, as Seller
and Servicer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, does hereby certify as
follows:

     1. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
meanings as set forth in the Agreement or Series Supplement, as applicable.

     2. First USA is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.

     3. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer.

     4. This Certificate relates to the Distribution Date occuring on
15-Mar-01.
---------

     5. As of the date hereof, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, the
Servicer has performed in all material respects all its obligations under the
Agreement through the Monthly Period preceding such Distribution Date.

     6. As of the date hereof, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, no Pay
Out Event has been deemed to have occurred on or prior to such Distribution
Date.

     7. As of the date hereof, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, no Lien
has been placed on any of the Receivables other than pursuant to the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this
Certificate this 9th day of Mar-01.
                 ---        ------


     FIRST USA BANK, N.A.
     as Servicer

     By:       /s/ Tracie H. Klein
               -----------------------
               Tracie H. Klein
               First Vice President
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October      23, 2008 |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |
|                             |   |
| /s/ Stephen J. Sperco            |   |
| Stephen      J. Sperco           |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer     |   |
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SAM MOORE.

January 13, 1986.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 211 

To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project Transfer 

Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River 

Project Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain 

property descriptions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIP4 TIONS IN PROVO RIVER PROJECT TRANSFER 

5 ACT. 

6 (a) PLEASANT GROVE PROPERTY.—Section 2(4)(A) 

7 of the Provo River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108– 

8 382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended by striking ‘‘of enactVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:13 Feb 09, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S211.IS S211

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 211 IS

1 ment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on which the parcel is 

2 conveyed under section 3(a)(2)’’. 

3 (b) PROVO RESERVOIR CANAL.—Section 2(5) of the 

4 Provo River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108–382; 

5 118 Stat. 2212) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘canal, and any associated land, 

7 rights-of-way, and facilities’’ and inserting ‘‘water 

8 conveyance facility historically known as the Provo 

9 Reservoir Canal and all associated bridges, fixtures, 

10 structures, facilities, lands, interests in land, and 

11 rights-of-way held,’’; 

12 (2) by inserting ‘‘and forebay’’ after ‘‘Diversion 

13 Dam’’; 

14 (3) by inserting ‘‘near the Jordan Narrows to 

15 the point where water is discharged to the Welby16 Jacob Canal and the Utah Lake Distributing Canal’’ 

17 after ‘‘Penstock’’; and 

18 (4) by striking ‘‘of enactment of this Act’’ and 

19 inserting ‘‘on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is 

20 conveyed under section 3(a)(1)’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Resource for Biopreservation.
    Date: September 14, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: William J Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0725, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f454047415c4041586f4147434d460141464701484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b2b7b0b6abb7b6af98b6b0b4bab1f6b6b1b0f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Cardiovascular Computational Model.
    Date: September 17, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Youngsuk Oh, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 7182, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0277, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#49302621092428202567272021672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85fceaedc5e8e4ece9abebecedabe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 24, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-21526 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>