alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 3, 2010 

s0526 

Order 

 

June 3, 2010 

140400 

CHERYL DEBANO-GRIFFIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140400 

 COA: 282921 

Lake CC: 05-006469-CZ 

LAKE COUNTY and LAKE COUNTY BOARD 

OF COMMISSIONERS, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issue raised by 

the defendants but not addressed by that court during its initial review of the case. The 

Court of Appeals erred in holding that the plaintiff was not engaged in protected activity 

under the Whistleblowers Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq. Reporting a 

“suspected violation of a law” is protected activity. MCL 15.362. MCL 211.24f(2)(d) 

requires the ballot to include “[a] clear statement of the purpose for the millage.” In City 

of South Haven v Van Buren Co Bd of Comm’rs, 478 Mich 518, 533 n 23, 534 (2007), 

this Court, relying on this statutory language, held that “funds derived from levies must 

be used for the purpose stated in the ballot,” and that using such funds for another 

purpose would “violate the law.” See also, MCL 750.489; MCL 750.490; MCL 

141.439. Accordingly, when the plaintiff reported her concerns that the ambulance 

funds were being used for purposes other than those stated in the ballot, the plaintiff was 

reporting a “suspected violation of a law,” and, thus, was engaged in protected activity. 

Because the plaintiff reported a suspected violation of an actual law, it is unnecessary to 

address whether the reporting of a suspected violation of a suspected law constitutes 

protected activity. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
** **** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March31, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from_________to _________

 

Commission file number0-14187

 

CONSOLIDATED CAPITALINSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/3, LP

(Exact name of registrant asspecified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executiveoffices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number,including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) hasfiled all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subjectto such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  [X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant hassubmitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, everyInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (orfor such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post suchfiles). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smallerreporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X]No
fs12014a1ex4iv_greenpro.htm


Exhibit 4.4


 



Greenpro, Inc.


9/F., Kam Chung Commercial Building, 19-21 Hennessy Road


Wanchai, Hong Kong


 




	 	May 6, 2014
	 	 





 




VIA EMAIL


Lee Chong Kuang


 


Re:    Amendment to the Greenpro, Inc. Note


 


Dear Mr. Lee:







Greenpro, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby seeks your consent to make certain amendments to the Promissory Note of the Company in the principal amount of $41,250 originally issued on August 12, 2013 (the “Note”) in the name of Lee Chong Kuang (“Lee”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.







1.           Amendment to the Note.  This Agreement amends and restates the first paragraph of the Note as follows:







“FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Greenpro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to Lee Chong Kuang (together with its registered assigns, the “Holder”) on August 12, 2014 (the “Maturity Date”) the principal sum of Forty-one Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty UNITED STATES DOLLARS (U.S.$41,250) (the “Principal”), and to pay to the Holder interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note as provided in Article I hereof. ”







2.           Waiver of Defaults. Lee hereby (i) waives the Defaults as define in Section 5.1 of the Note in connection with the extension of the Maturity Date of the Note, and (ii) to release the Company from the obligations of such Defaults and to waive any claims against the Company in connection with such Defaults or the transactions contemplated hereby.







3.           No Other Changes.  Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, all other provisions of the Note (as amended) shall remain in full force and effect.







4.           Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original agreement, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Execution and delivery of this Agreement by facsimile transmission (including the delivery of documents in Adobe PDF format) shall constitute execution and delivery of this Agreement for all purposes, with the same force and effect as execution and delivery of an original manually signed copy hereof.


 




  





  











  











5.           Governing Law.  This Agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder of each of the parties hereto shall be governed by, and interpreted and determined in accordance with, the law of the State of Nevada without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles.







6.           Conflicts.  To the extent that any term or provision of this Agreement conflicts with any term or provision of the Note, as amended, the term or provision of this Agreement shall control.


 






	 	
Very truly yours,


 



Greenpro, Inc.



	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Loke Che Chan, Gilbert	 
	 	Name:	Loke Che Chan, Gilbert	 
	 	Title:	
Chief Financial Officer

	 







 



TERMS AGREED TO:




 








	/s/ Lee Chong Kuang 	 
	
Name: Lee Chong Kuang
#### ROBERT AYERS v. TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON.

September 5, 1985.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 202 *N.J.Super.*106)
#### Hunter LIGHTFOOT et al., Appellants, v. W. E. UPTON, Exec. of the Estate of Zula L. Upton, etc., et al., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1974.

Chester I. Bays, Bowling Green, for appellants.

B. G. Davidson, Bowling Green, for ap-pellees.

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court; Thomas W. Hines, Judge.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by Special Commissioner E. SKILES JONES, Affirming.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (10-098)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Commercial Space Committee of the NASA Advisory Council.

# DATES:

Tuesday September 14, 8 a.m. to 12 noon CDT.

# ADDRESSES:

NASA Johnson Space Center, Building 1, Room 966.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. John Emond, Innovative Partnerships Program, Office of the Chief Technologist, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546. Phone 202-358-1686,                         *fax:*                         202-358-3878,                         *john.l.emond@nasa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The intent of this meeting is to brief the Space Operations Committee of the NASA Advisory Council on recent                           ( print page 53350)                        deliberations by the Commercial Space Committee, and to exchange information on matters of mutual interest regarding commercial cargo and crew planning efforts. The Commercial Space Committee will also attend a briefing by NASA officials to the Space Operations Committee following the joint discussion. The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Please e-mail Mr. John Emond at                     *john.l.emond@nasa.gov,*                     if you plan to attend.                

August 25, 2010.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010-21689 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
I N TH E SUPREM E COURT O F THE STAT E O F MONTANA Cas e No
. DA 21 - 0533 STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non - profit Corporation; CLINTON DECKER; JESSICA DECKER; MARTIN NORUNNER; APRIL MARIE DAVIS; MORGEN HUNT; GABRIEL EARLE; ERICK PRATHER; BRADFORD CAMPBELL; MEAGAN CAMPBELL; AMY ORR and JARED ORR ,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ELEMENTARY DISTRICT NO. 1, HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, MISSOULA COUNTY, STATE OF MONTANA; TARGET RANGE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23; and HELLGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 4,

Defendants and Appellees, STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non - profit corporation; JASMINE ALBERINO, TIMOTHY ALBERINO, VICTORIA BENTLEY, DAVID DICKEY, WESLEY GILBERT, KATIE GILBERT, KIERSTEN GLOVER, RICHARD JORGENSON, STEPHEN PRUIETT, LINDSEY PRUIETT, ANGELA MARSHALL, SEAN LITTLEJOHN, and KENTON SAWDY,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. 01/28/20222

B OZEMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7, MONFORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 27, and BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 72, Defendants and Appellees. On Appeal from the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court Missoula County, Cause No. DV

-21

- 1031 Before Hon. Jason Marks On Appeal from the Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court

Gallatin County, Cause No. DV

-21

- 975B Before Hon. Rienne H. McElyea
ORDER GRANTING M ONTANA STATE LEGISLATORSMOTION FOR LEAVETO FILE AMICUS CURIAE Quentin M. Rhoades RHOADES & ERICKSEN, PLLC 430 Ryman Street Missoula, Montana 59802 Telephone: 406 - 721 - 9700 qmr@montanalawyer.com courtdocs@montanalawyer.com For Appellants Elizabeth A. Kaleva Kevin A. Twidwell Elizabeth A. O’Halloran KALEVA LAW OFFICES 1911 S. Higgins Ave. P.O. Box 9312 Missoula, MT 59807 eakaleva@kalevalaw.com ktwidwell@kalevalaw.com boholloran@kalevalaw.com For Appellees Abby Jane Moscatel BLACKTAIL LAW GROUP, PLLC P.O. Box 931 Lakeside, MT 59922 Telephone: 406 - 318 - 7223 amoscatel@blacktaillaw.com3

For Montana Legislators Moving to File Amicus Curiae

Upon motion of Montana State Legislators Sen. Theresa Manzella , SD 44 (Sponsor); Sen. David Howard, SD 29; Sen. Carl Glimm, SD 02; Sen. Greg Hertz, SD 06; Sen. Steve Hinebauch, SD 18; Sen. Keith Regier, SD 03; Sen. Bob Keenan, SD 05; Sen. Cary Smith, SD 27; Rep. Matt Regier, HD 04; Rep. John Fuller, HD 08; Rep. Steve n Galloway, HD 24; Rep. Steve Gunderson, HD 01; Rep. Jedediah Hinkle, HD 67; Rep. Mark Noland, HD 10; Rep. Ron Marshall, HD 87; Rep. Bob Phalen, HD 36; Rep. Amy Regier, HD 06; Rep. Kerri Seekins - Crowe, HD 43; Rep. Lola Sheldon - Galloway, HD 22; Rep. Derek S kees, HD 11; Rep. Brad Tschida, HD 97; Rep. Barry Usher, HD 40; Rep. Sue Vinton, HD 56; Rep. Paul Fielder, HD 13; Rep. Becky Beard, HD 80; and Rep. Jerry Schillinger, HD 37, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Montana State Legislators’

m otion is GRANTED. The Montana State Legislators shall have up to February 7, 2022, in which to file their Friend of the Court Brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2022
#### LITTLE v. STOGNER

No. 571P00

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 380

Petition by defendant (Jack Douglas Stogner individually, and Jack Douglas Stogner, as Administrator of the Estate of Peggy W. Stogner) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 2001.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Jon Young, Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Star Gold Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Liberty Star Gold Corp. for the year ended January 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Liberty Star Gold Corp. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: May 12, 2005

/s/ Jon Young__________________

Jon Young

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities and Exchange Actof                  1934; and |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and resultof                  operations of the Company. |   |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  January 16, 2007 |   |   | By:                  */s/                  Bryan                  Chance             * |
|                                         |   |   | Bryan                  Chance Chief                    Executive Officer                                                                                |

----
#### Wilson-Western Sporting Goods Co. *v.*Shaffer, Trustee.

(No. 25457

Decided June 26, 1935.)

*Mr. Willis Bacon*and *Mr. Paul Ware,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George J. Carson*and *Mr. C. T. Moore,*for defendant in error.

*127It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error he, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Day, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the  Amendment to Annual  Report of  MachineTalker,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KA for the period ending December 31, 2008 (the
"Report") I, Roland Bryan, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: December 7, 2009




By:  /s/ Roland Bryan
     --------------------------------------------------
     Roland Bryan, Chief Executive Officer and
     President (Principal Executive Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Actof                1934; and |   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and resultof                operations of the Company. |   |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| Date:                July 15, 2008 | By:                */s/                Bryan                Chance             * |   |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |                                                                                                                                              |   |
|                               | Bryan                Chance                                                                                                                       |   |
|                               | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                            |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee
 for the Hugoton Royalty Trust:

We are aware that Cross Timbers Oil Company has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statement No. 333-81849 on Form S-8, Hugoton Royalty Trust's Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, which includes our report dated May
2, 2001, covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein.
Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not
considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by our
firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Fort Worth, Texas
May 10, 2001

                                                                              18
No. 07-15-00091-CR

Ex parte Daniel Lee Ainsworth §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No. 1

of Potter County

July 15, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 15, 2015

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the County Court

at Law No. 1 of Potter County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this

Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O oNo. 07-15-00106-CR

Ex parte Daniel Lee Ainsworth §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No. 1

of Potter County

July 15, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 15, 2015

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the County Court

at Law No. 1 of Potter County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this

Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O oNo. 07-15-00107-CR

Ex parte Daniel Lee Ainsworth §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No. 1

of Potter County

July 15, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 15, 2015

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the County Court

at Law No. 1 of Potter County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this

Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O o