alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2340 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the Secretary to 

provide for the use of data from the second preceding tax year to 

carry out the simplification of applications for the estimation and determination of financial aid eligibility, to increase the income threshold 

to qualify for zero expected family contribution, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2014 

Mr. BOOKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

the Secretary to provide for the use of data from the 

second preceding tax year to carry out the simplification 

of applications for the estimation and determination of 

financial aid eligibility, to increase the income threshold 

to qualify for zero expected family contribution, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simplifying Financial 

5 Aid for Students Act of 2014’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2340 IS

1 SEC. 2. USING DATA FOR SECOND PRECEDING YEAR. 

2 Section 480(a)(1)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 

3 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(a)(1)(B)) is amended to read as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding section 478(a) and 

6 beginning not later than 180 days after the 

7 date of enactment of the Simplifying Financial 

8 Aid for Students Act of 2014, the Secretary 

9 shall provide for the use of data from the sec10 ond preceding tax year when and to the extent 

11 necessary to carry out the simplification of ap12 plications (including simplification for a subset 

13 of applications) used for the estimation and de14 termination of financial aid eligibility. Such 

15 simplification shall include the sharing of data 

16 between the Internal Revenue Service and the 

17 Department, pursuant to the consent of the 

18 taxpayer.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. ZERO EXPECTED FAMILY CONTRIBUTION. 

20 Section 479(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

21 (20 U.S.C. 1087ss(c)) is amended— 

22 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘$23,000’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘$30,000’’; and 

24 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘$23,000’’ 

25 and inserting ‘‘$30,000’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Investors
First-Staged Equity L.P. 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768834
<NAME> INVESTORS FIRST-STAGED EQUITY L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           8,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         46,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,292
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,667
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,348)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (529)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    32.20<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SECOND QUARTER 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,479,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,328,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      9,602,021
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,402,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,328,093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               531,639
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               172,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             572,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (214,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (214,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                               6,123,739
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,909,699
<EPS-BASIC>                                   268.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   268.14


</TABLE>
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of K.D.P . and * From the 132 nd District Court

K.R.P ., children, of Scurry County,

Trial Court No. 26594

.

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 36 7

- CV * January 9 , 20 20

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court h a s con sidered Kelissa Hill ’s motion to dismiss this appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance

with this court’s opinion, the appe al is dismissed . The costs incurred by reason

of this appeal are taxed against Kelissa Hill

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CONSOLIDATED
CAPITAL  INSTITUTIONAL  PROPERTIES/3 2000 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                            0000768890
<NAME>                           CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/3
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 3,696
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            905
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                54,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (18,648)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        41,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               27,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            11,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          41,175
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       6,864
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       5,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             9
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,450
<EPS-BASIC>                                             3.75 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Matthew W. Shankle, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advance Display
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and I have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
     is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
     business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
     or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005


/s/ Matthew W. Shankle
----------------------
Matthew W. Shankle
President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
#### MADGE MALANDRA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIARY.

December 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                       EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ResCon Technology Corp., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Henrik Klausgaard, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.



Date: January 24, 2005       /S/ Henrik Klausgaard
                             ---------------------------------------
                             Henrik Klausgaard
                             Principal Executive Officer
#### Lonnie Eugene TENNISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. KCD 26326.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District.

March 4, 1974.

*94Cullen Cline, Public Defender, 13th Judicial Circuit, Columbia, for appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., G. Michael O’Neal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before PRITCHARD, P. J, and SWOFFORD and SOMERVILLE, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Appeal following an evidentiary hearing in Boone County Circuit Court, before Phil H. Cook, Special Judge, from a judgment denying relief on appellant’s Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion.

Upon a plea of guilty, appellant was sentenced, in September, 1970, to imprisonment for 15 years, on a charge of robbery in the first degree. By his Rule 27.26 motion, appellant challenged the voluntariness of the plea. Two arguments were advanced challenging the plea. First, the plea was coerced by threats, physical abuse and mistreatment. Second, the plea was entered as a result of promises, by law enforcement officials, of leniency.

In this court, appellant has challenged the sufficiency of the findings made by the court below regarding the voluntariness of the plea. Additionally, appellant has challenged on appeal the adequacy of the sentencing court’s compliance with Rule 25.04.

This latter contention not having been raised in appellant’s Rule 27.26 motion or at the hearing on the motion, is not properly before this court. Kimble v. State, 487 S.W.2d 544 (Mo.1972); Shoemake v. State, 462 S.W.2d 772 (Mo. banc 1971).

Having examined the record of the Rule 27.26 hearing and the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered below, the judgment denying relief on the grounds of an involuntary plea is not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and an extended opinion would be without preceden-tial value. Rule 84.16.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN v. THE GUTWEIN-GUENTHER PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, HENRY D. DAGITT, P.C. AND OLIVER & BECICA, AIA, P.A.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
389 A.2d 174

#### Commonwealth v. Mason, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1974.

Richard Farber, Assistant Defender, and Vincent J. Ziccardi, Defender, for appellant;

Harry M. Spaeth, Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 229 

AN ACT 

To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. 

Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 229 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. 

3 Crescenz Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ DEPARTMENT 

5 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The medical center of the De7 partment of Veterans Affairs located at 3900 Woodland 

8 Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as 

10 the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Vet11 erans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

12 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula13 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

14 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

15 shall be considered to be a reference to the Corporal Mi16 chael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

17 Center. 

Passed the Senate December 3, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 229 

AN ACT 

To designate the medical center of the Department 

Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. ‘‘Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the of Veterans Affairs located at 3900 Woodland
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20812 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-92-CR-184

- - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and D E MOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Richard Cruz contends that the district court erred in denying

his motion to be transferred from state to federal custody pursuant

to Fed. R. App. P. 23(a), and that he is entitled to credit for

time served on his federal sentence.

The denial of Cruz's motion, insofar as he is seeking relief

under Rule 23(a), is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Insofar as Cruz is challenging the manner in which his

sentence is being executed, his motion is construed as a petitionNo. 95-20812

-2-

for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. United States v.

Brown

, 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir. 1985) . The district court's

dismissal of Cruz's § 2241 petition, based on Cruz's failure to

demonstrate that he has exhausted his administrative remedies with

respect t o the calculation of his federal sentence, is affirmed.

See United States v. Dowling , 962 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir. 1992).

Cruz asserts for the first time on appeal that he is entitled

to have his federal and state sentences run concurrently, and that,

as a result of the federal detainer lodged against him, he is being

deprived of the right to serve as a trusty, the right to earn

additional good-time credits, and the right to advance his parole

date. Because these issues were not raised before the district

court, they are reviewable only for plain error. H ighlands Ins. v.

National Union Fire Ins.

, 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994),

cert. denied

, 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). Cruz has failed to show that

error, plain or otherwise, occurred in connection with the denial

of these claims. S ee United States v. Dovalina

, 711 F.2d 737, 739

(5th Cir. 1983).

Cruz's motion to file a reply brief out-of-time is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
#### Carter D. KINCAID, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 1, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 7, 1973.

Charles William Arnold, Lexington, for appellant.

Ed. Hancock, Atty. Gen. Douglas E. Johnson, Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice OSBORNE,

Affirming.*
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CRAIG EAST.

January 28, 1986.

Leave to appeal granted.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code), the undersignedofficer of TeliaSonera AB, a Swedish company (the “*Company*”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1)     the AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “*Report*”)  fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

2)     the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ KIM IGNATIUS |
|--------|--------|------------------|
|   |   | Name:            |   | Kim Ignatius |
|   |   | Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | Date:            |   | April 6, 2006 |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Java Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lance Musicant,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


Dated: June 27, 2005            /s/ Lance Musicant
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Lance Musicant,
                                Chief Executive and Financial Officer