alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Central  Jersey  Bancorp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004 (the  "Report"),
I, Anthony Giordano, III, Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Dated: March 30, 2005                         /s/ Anthony Giordano, III
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Anthony Giordano, III
                                              Executive Vice President,
                                              Chief Financial Officer,
                                              Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
#### MEDFORD CONVALESCENT AND NURSING CENTER v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES.

December 23, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
#### BRANDON v. BRANDON

No. 279P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 185

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 July 2001.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,571-02

EX PARTE REGINALD D. FIELDS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1490015-A IN THE 208 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

felon in possession of a firearm and sentenced to imprisonment for 8 years.

On July 6, 2016, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court. On Oct. 29, 2019,

observing that no further orders had been received within the time allotted by Tex. R. App. P. Rule

73.4, the district clerk correctly forwarded the application to this Court. However, the record before

this Court indicates that the designated issues have still not been resolved. We remand this

application to the 208 District Court of Harris County to allow the trial judge to complete an th
evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: December 11, 2019

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund V (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Rancon Realty Fund V
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEON WOODSON.

November 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Titan Global Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Scott Hensell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Actof
                1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and resultof
                operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to Titan Global Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Global
      Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.





Date:
                April 14, 2008
            By:
            */s/*Scott
                Hensell**Scott
                HensellChief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1








Exhibit 10.1


Employment Arrangements with Richard R. House, Jr.


On February 21, 2014, Richard R. House, Jr. announced his resignation as President and a member of the Board of Directors of Atlanticus Holdings Corporation, effective March 31, 2014. The Company intends to continue paying Mr. House his current base salary ($83,333 per month) and providing his existing insurance coverage through August 31, 2014 in exchange for his completion of ongoing projects during this time.
No. 87-6247.

#### Haas *v.*Wilcox et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fast Eddie Racing Stables,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A. Little,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 4, 2004                        By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                           -------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fast Eddie Racing  Stables,  Inc. and will be retained by Fast Eddie
Racing Stables,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1 

Certifications Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 14, 2016

 

| By:    |   | /s/ Bohn H. Crain              |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Bohn H. Crain                  |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer        |
|   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)  |
|   |   |                           |
| By:    |   | /s/ Todd E. Macomber           |
|   |   | Todd E. Macomber               |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|   |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard GANT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 35426.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Two.

March 19, 1974.

Motion for Rehearing or Transfer to Court En Banc or to Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 8, 1974.

*15Brady, Brady & Devereaux, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Thomas W. Shannon, Robert Hoffman, Stephen A. Moore, Dennis F. Kay, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction, in a court tried case, of a violation of Sec. 563.280, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., selling obscene matter. He was fined $300.

Defendant raises three points. His contention that no specific finding of obscenity was made by the trial court was ruled by us recently in State v. Richardson, 488 S.W.2d 506 (Mo.App.1974) contrary to defendant’s position. His attack on the “seizure” of the magazine is misplaced— there was no seizure, the policeman bought the magazine from defendant.

Defendant also contends scienter was not established. In State v. Richardson, supra, we outlined the rules of law respecting scienter in a case of selling obscene matter. Here the police officer selected from a rack a copy of the magazine “Ball Busters” which was encased in a clear plastic cover. He had inquired of defendant before selecting the magazine “Where the better magazines were and where the ones depicting males and females in the act of intercourse were.” Defendant stated “Our best magazines are on that rack” indicating the one from which the officer selected the magazine. After making the selection the officer showed the front cover of the magazine to defendant and inquired “if the pictures inside the book were as good as the pictures on the front.” Defendant stated “I don’t know if all of them are as good as that picture.”

The front cover depicted in color and close-up a woman successfully completing an act of fellatio. The pictures inside were of a similar nature. Defendant’s examination of the front cover and his statements to the officer are sufficient to establish scienter.

Judgment affirmed.

CLEMENS and GUNN, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4911

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

VICTOR JOSEPH SANGUEDOLCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief

District Judge. (CR-94-144-V)

Submitted: August 5, 1997 Decided: August 27, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Gronquist, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T.

Calloway, United States Attorney, David C. Keesler, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Victor Joseph Sanguedolce, Jr., appeals from the district

court judgment revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four months of imprisonment. We affirm.

Sanguedolce was charged with seven separate violations of the

terms of his supervised release. Following a revocation hearing the

district court found sufficient evidence to demonstrate commission

of all alleged violations save an allegation that Sanguedolce had

failed to pay a fifty dollar special assessment. Sanguedolce argues

on appeal that there was insufficient evidence to support the district court's findings.

Notwithstanding Sanguedolce's contentions, we note that

Sanguedolce himself admitted to violating his supervised release by

using both marijuana and cocaine. The evidence presented before the

district court also revealed that Sanguedolce tested positive for

cocaine use on three separate occasions. We find that this evidence

alone is not only sufficient to justify revocation of Sanguedolce's

supervised release, but compels it. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), (g)

(1994); United States v. Clark, 30 F.3d 23, 25 (4th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joan Caroline ALBERT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harry DECLUE and Georgia Declue, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 35548.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Two.

June 17, 1975.

Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied Aug. 7, 1975.

Samuel Richeson, Nicholas G. Gasaway, Dearing, Richeson, Roberts <& Wegmann, Hillsboro, for defendants-appellants.

Joseph Hewlett, Shaw & Hewlett, Clayton, for plaintiff-respondent.

*40STEWART, Judge.

Defendants appeal from the judgment in this court tried case in which the court quieted title to a triangular piece of land in plaintiff and further found that defendants had not carried the burden of proving that they had obtained title to that land by adverse possession.

Plaintiff is the record owner of a 40 acre tract of land in Washington County which adjoins a 40 acre tract owned by defendants. Defendants’ property lies to the south of that of plaintiff. Defendants sought to establish title to a triangular tract to the north of the common record boundary line of the parties.1 The portion of plaintiff’s property claimed by defendants was fenced with barbed wire primarily set in trees. While fencing is one of the strongest indications of adverse possession the primary issue here was whether the defendants had held adversely for the necessary prescriptive time. The evidence on this point was conflicting, we must therefore give great deference to the finding of the trial court who was in better position to judge the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence. *Marshall v. Marshall,*484 S.W.2d 208 (Mo.1972). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous; no errors of law appear. A full opinion would have no precedential value we thus affirm in accord with Rule 84.16(b), Y.A.M.R.

CLEMENS, P. J. and KELLY, J., concur.

1

. It would serve no useful purpose to recite the lengthy legal description in this opinion.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2179 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive the minimum period of 

continuous active duty in the Armed Forces for receipt of benefits for 

homeless veterans, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

furnish benefits for homeless veterans to homeless veterans with discharges or releases from service in the Armed Forces under other than 

honorable conditions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2014 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive the minimum period of continuous active duty in the Armed 

Forces for receipt of benefits for homeless veterans, to 

authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish 

benefits for homeless veterans to homeless veterans with 

discharges or releases from service in the Armed Forces 

under other than honorable conditions, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2179 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Veterans 

3 Services Protection Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MINIMUM PERIOD OF CONTINUOUS AC5 TIVE DUTY IN ARMED FORCES FOR BENEFITS 

6 FOR HOMELESS VETERANS. 

7 Section 5303A(b)(3) of title 38, United States Code, 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) and 

10 (G) as subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively; and 

11 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol12 lowing new subparagraph (F): 

13 ‘‘(F) to benefits under chapter 20 of this title;’’. 

14 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION TO FURNISH BENEFITS FOR 

15 HOMELESS VETERANS TO HOMELESS VET16 ERANS WITH DISCHARGES OR RELEASES 

17 UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDI18 TIONS. 

19 Section 5303(d) of title 38, United States Code, is 

20 amended— 

21 (1) by striking ‘‘not apply to any war-risk in22 surance’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘not apply to 

23 the following: 

24 ‘‘(1) Any war-risk insurance’’; and 

25 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

26 paragraph: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2179 IS

1 ‘‘(2) Benefits under chapter 20 of this title.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHRISTINE CAMERON.

October 29, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000769131
<NAME>                        RANCON REALTY FUND V
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         11,146
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,360
<PP&E>                                         31,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 51,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          331
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   51,212
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,783
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (216
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (216)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (2.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.22)



</TABLE>
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN ROBERTO ALBINO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LEE BACA, Los Angeles County

Sheriff; LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-55702

D.C. No.

2:08-cv-03790-

GAF-MLG

ORDER

Filed March 12, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,

it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule

35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1934 

To extend the existing provisions regarding the eligibility for essential air 

service subsidies through fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2007 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To extend the existing provisions regarding the eligibility 

for essential air service subsidies through fiscal year 

2012, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT 

4 CERTAIN LOCATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 409(d) of the Vision 

6 100—Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (Public 

7 Law 108–176; 49 U.S.C. 41731 note) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘September 

9 30, 2012’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1934 IS

1 (b) REQUIREMENT FOR CONTINUATION OF ESSEN2 TIAL AIR SERVICE BY CERTAIN AIR CARRIERS FOR 90 

3 DAYS AFTER TERMINATION OF CONTRACT.—Any air car4 rier that provides essential air service to a place described 

5 in section 409(a) of the Vision 100—Century of Aviation 

6 Reauthorization Act (Public Law 108–176; 49 U.S.C. 

7 41731 note) and has a contract for the provision of such 

8 essential air service that expires on September 30, 2007, 

9 shall continue to provide such essential air service to such 

10 place until at least the earlier of— 

11 (1) January 1, 2008; or 

12 (2) the date on which the Secretary of Trans13 portation identifies a new air carrier to provide such 

14 essential air service. 

15 (c) AIR CARRIER DEFINED.—In this section, the 

16 term ‘‘air carrier’’ has the meaning provided such term 

17 in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS