alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(c)

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to

Household Finance Corporation ("HSBC" Finance")

HFC REVOLVING CORPORATION

HOUSEHOLD HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-1

 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of HSBC Finance (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2001 among HFC Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, Master Servicer and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.  (as Successor in Interest to Bank One, National Association ), as Trustee, (the "Agreement") that:

A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through 

December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement throughout such Year.  Based on such review, the Master Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth below.

			NONE

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 1st day of March, 2005.                              

					HSBC Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith			
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

P.N.,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 307 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Fast Eddie Racing Stables, Inc.
File No. 0-19276

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fast Eddie Racing Stables,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 1999 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Glenn A. Little,  Chief  Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 4, 2004                          By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ---------------                             ------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fast Eddie Racing  Stables,  Inc. and will be retained by Fast Eddie
Racing Stables,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### VAN WINKLE & LIGGETT, ETC. v. G.B.R. FABRICS, INC.

October 3, 1985.

Petition for certification granted.
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10852

(Summary Calendar)

JIMMY ROY DAVIDSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LONA CHEAIRS; PAULETTE GOODMAN; OFFICER MCCLOUD;

WHYSHOSISKY, Officer; HEARSED, Officer; NUMELEY, Officer;

BROWN, Officer; AMEER, Officer; D GRAVES, Officer; DAVIS, 

Sergeant; WILSON, Lieutenant; C RAINES, Warden; 

HERKOLOTZS, Deputy Director, Texas Department of Criminal

Justice; CLAYTON R HIGGINS, JR; WILLIAM K SUTER; F ROMO; 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; CANTRAIL, Officer; TEXAS 

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Regional Grievance Director,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-335

March 25, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jimmy Roy Davidson, Texas prisoner # 612588, has appealed the district court’s dismissal

of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. We AFFIRM.

Davidson failed to state a claim of denial of accessto the courts, based on prison authorities’
2

failure to mail timely his certiorari petition to the Supreme Court. See Lewis v. Casey, 116 S. Ct.

2174, 2178-82 (1996). He also failed to state a claim for damages based on the alleged loss of part

of the record of his criminal trial. See Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 328 (1986). This dismissal

of Davidson’s action with prejudice was appropriate because he does not contend, and it does not

appear, that he could state a claim in another amended complaint. See Jacquez v. Procunier, 801

F.2d 789, 793 (5th Cir. 1986). 

Davidson contends that he should be permitted to withdraw his 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) consent

to proceed before the magistrate judge in the district court, because it was wrongfully induced. The

court will not consider this claim, because the district court could have resolved its factual issues if

Davidson had raised it there. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000768216
<NAME>                        National Air Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,477
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       738
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (736)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2195 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2195

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
  To deny admission to the United States to any representative to the 
  United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage 
activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses a 
          threat to United States national security interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. VISA LIMITATION FOR CERTAIN REPRESENTATIVES TO THE UNITED 
NATIONS.
    Section 407(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1990 and 1991 (8 U.S.C. 1102 note) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``such individual has been found to have been 
    engaged in espionage activities'' and inserting the following: 
    ``such individual--
        ``(1) has been found to have been engaged in espionage 
    activities or a terrorist activity (as defined in section 
    212(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
    1182(a)(3)(B)(iii)))''; and
        (2) by striking ``allies and may pose'' and inserting the 
    following: ``allies; and
        ``(2) may pose''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthis annual report of Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William J. Begley, Jr., Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andSecretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

·                     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.
| /s/ WILLIAM  J. BEGLEY, JR.              |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| William J. Begley, Jr.                   |
| *Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and* |
| *Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)*     |
| March 1, 2007                            |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Investors
First Staged  Equity,  L.P. 2000 Second  Quarter  10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000768834
<NAME>                              Investors First-Staged Equity L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 2,536
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            570
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                36,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (22,089)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        18,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               30,090
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                           (13,429)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          18,340
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       3,073
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       2,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             134
<EPS-BASIC>                                             8.18 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

**‘ 3**  **,mLD c.**  **nmn**

**.- •**  **-- J** 

Han. Lea Presnel.3. COUty Attorney Upehur County Oilmer, Texaai Bar sirs

of 

### thi8 daptwb yea .is aQ-YfcaDwQ:

pasaengsr ae.sv al8 other 

### thsn 8 atotor

&Mxw Bus* 8hal.X inolude every vehlcle exoept taose operate4 by xutl*ular power or exclu.uaively

OD otatlonaryrails% oz traoke, whhiah is used in tm~rt~ pereonsbet-en or through tW@ ,a%:*ZO inCOrpaZ%tteQHon. Leo Prean~ll,
oities and/or peneation (or fIxed route6 or osnerwlees exoept euoh or soid vehiolee aa are operated exoluslv~ly within the limits of inoorpoiated oitles and/ or towns or suburbanadditiona to 8uoh towna."

. . .~Yourletter atfr+ that the vehiole lqulr-

_ - ed amu'T;

le operatearer hire in the tranaportatlon of aohool pupll.8.However, your letter does not give us the route of the vehiolo or 5nform ua whether it ~II operatedbetweenor tbrougb two ok more lnoorporated oltlea and or towna and/or villages or operateduslualrelywit

6In the llmlts of inooriorated oities towna or suburbanaddltione to muah town& under wording oithe statute ii the bum $8 operatedbetween two or through two or more lnoorporated eitles and/Or towna ar villagea then it must ne6ea&lybe 0&@8- iSled as a nytor L.

If the buis

i6 aperatodwer ruralroad@ and is not operatedbetween 

### or through two or more inoorporatedoitles, town8 or rlllage8;thaol it may 

### properly be regietersdan 

### a passenger ear.

We bsllwethat if youha~ethe~tactts tit hand to dotoralnethe muto &f the vehiblo, you will than be able to dotemd$ne whether it is olaeaifled aa a paesengsrear or as a motor bur* Your8 very truly

APPROVED **OPINION** 

# 0 COMMn-rEE ?&f&F
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Minority Programs Review Committee, Minority Programs Review Subcommittee B.                     

*Date:*                         November 14, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 a.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hilton-Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca H. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2771,                         *johnsonrhnigms.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

 [FR Doc. E8-24447 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### George Augustus DUNHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46014.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1973.

John K. DeLay, Jr., Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., and Michael P. Gibson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of robbery. Punishment was assessed at 25 years’ confinement.

Only one ground of error is alleged on appeal. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged; the facts in this cause are set out in the companion case of Overton v. State, 490 S.W.2d 556 (1973).

Appellant challenges the legality of the warrantless search of the automobile. As stated in Overton v. State, supra, the search of the vehicle was made only after consent to make the search had been given by a Mr. Suedkamp. The automobile had been leased to Suedkamp and police officers were present when employees of the automobile rental agency came to pick up the car. Suedkamp voluntarily turned over the keys to the automobile to an employee of *182the leasing company. Then the car was searched to determine if any personal property had been left inside. Among the items recovered were a money bag, two loaded guns, and cash.

Appellant is in no position to challenge the legality of the search. Possession of the automobile had been returned to the automobile rental agency when the search occurred. Suedkamp himself testified that he “did consent to [the rental agency] taking the car and I did give [them] the car keys.” We overrule appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7838

EDWIN LEE JURY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LOU DIXON, R.N., Buckingham Correctional Center; CHARLENE STEWART; LARRY THOMAS, Chief

Pharmacist, Virginia Department of Corrections

Central Pharmacy,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CENTRAL

PHARMACY; BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER

MEDICAL DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-92-R)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Edwin Lee Jury, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner,

WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jury

v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections Central Pharmacy, No. CA-96-92-R

(W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00117-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1269829D

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

KEVIN DUANE TALKINGTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Kevin Duane Talkington attempts to appeal from the trial court’s 

order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel to assist him in obtaining

postconviction, forensic DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c). 

We notified Talkington of our belief that we do not have jurisdiction over his appeal 

because such an order is not immediately appealable and gave him an opportunity to 

respond showing grounds to continue his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3; Gutierrez v. 

State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); see also Whitfield v. State, 430 S.W.3d 

405, 408 n.11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Although we granted Talkington an extension 

to respond, he has failed to do so. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Gutierrez, 307 S.W.3d at 323.

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: November 24, 2021