alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         124,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,072
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,991
<COMMON>                                         3,834
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,556
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  319,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (316,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (316,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (316,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 30, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 30, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0253. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al v. CHARVETTE E. MONROE, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARGIE G. EVANS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2018RCSC01222
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Central  Jersey  Bancorp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"),  I,
James S.  Vaccaro,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  do
hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated: March 14, 2007                        /s/ James S. Vaccaro
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James S. Vaccaro
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Kaiser, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

(Decided June 27, 1938.)

*Messrs. Davies, Hoover S Beall,*for appellee.

*Mr. Herbert 8. Duffy,*attorney general, *Mr. Eugene Carlin*and *Mr. C. L. Hawthorne,*for appellant.

Ross, P. J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county. The plaintiff, an employee of The A. Nash Tailoring Company, was employed as' a pants presser, operating a power machine equipped with a steaming device and controlled by a pedal which plaintiff operated with his right foot. A considerable pressure was required to trip the pedal.

The evidence develops, that the constant operation of the machine by pressure upon the pedal produced a callous upon the right foot of the plaintiff; that later a blister appeared about the callous, which broke one day while he was operating the machine.

The number of garments pressed during a week or day varied, sometimes reaching the number of 3000 in one week.

Upon going to his home on the day the blister broke *421and examining his foot, plaintiff found a considerable quantity of liquid in his shoe, and, also, that there was quite an amount of separation.

He was attended by a physician. The testimony of the doctors is that a cancerous condition has followed the injury to the foot.

There is no question that the present condition of the plaintiff’s foot is due to his employment, grew out of it, and was caused by an injury incurred in the course of his employment, and by reason thereof. It was not self-inflicted, as that expression is used in the law.

The Constitution of Ohio, Section 35 of Article II, provides in part:

> “For the purpose of providing compensation to workmen and their dependents, for death, injuries or occupational disease, occasioned in the course of such workmen’s employment, laws may be passed establishing a state fund to be created by compulsory contribution thereto by employers, and administered by the state, determining the terms and conditions upon which payment shall be made therefrom.”

Section 1465-68, General Code, provides in part:

> “Every employee mentioned in Section 1465-61, who is injured, and the dependents of such as are killed in the course of employment, wheresoever such injury has occurred, provided the same was not purposely self-inflicted, on or after January 1st, 1914, shall be paid such compensation out of the state insurance fund for loss sustained on account of such injury or death as is provided in the case of other injured or killed employees, and shall be entitled to receive such medical, nurse and hospital services and medicines, and such amount of funeral expenses' as are payable in the case of other injured or killed em: ployees.”

This law defines the substituted rights of the employee,

*422We consider that the facts stated justify the verdict of the jury awarding participation in the State Insurance Fund.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Hamilton and Matthews, JJ., concur.
#### James R. YOCOM, Commissioner of Labor, etc., Appellant, v. Edward FLEMING et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 23, 1973.

Gemma M. Harding, Ky. Dept, of Labor, Louisville, for appellant.

John N. Cornett, Whitesburg, William A. Rice, Harlan, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The only authorized basis for an award against the Special Fund in this case would be a supportable finding that the claimant had a dormant nondisabling *disease*condition that was aroused or brought into disabling reality by reason of a subsequent compensable injury. Cf. KRS 342.120(1) (b), (3), (4). On the strength of its finding that he had “hysterical neurosis of a conservative type, which was dormant and nondisabling — arisen into disabling reality as a result of his injury,” the board apportioned 50% of the claimant’s 100% disability against the Special Fund, which has appealed from a judgment sustaining that action.

It is readily apparent from the context of the award that the board avoided the question of whether the preexisting condition was a disease. Moreover, in view of such opinions as Cabe v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation, Ky,, 412 S.W.2d 250 (1967), and City of Pikeville v. Maynard, Ky., 428 S.W.2d 202 (1968), there is no substantial evidence in the record from which it would have been justified in finding that it *was.*

The judgment is reversed for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

PALMORE, C. J., and MILLIKEN, OSBORNE, REED, STEINFELD and STEPHENSON, JJ., sitting.

All concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 35.2

                          SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
                     PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB
                     FIRST NATIONAL CREDIT CARD CENTER, INC.

                                                            Date: March 27, 2009

     The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First National Bank Credit
Card Center, Inc. ("FNCCC"), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Section
3.05(a) of the Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of October 24, 2002, among First National Funding LLC, as Transferor, First
National Bank of Omaha, as Servicer, and The Bank of New York Trust Company,
N.A., as successor trustee to The Bank of New York, as Trustee, as amended (the
"Pooling and Servicing Agreement")(2) and the Transfer and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of October 24, 2002, among First National Funding LLC, as Transferor,
First National Bank of Omaha, as Servicer, and First National Master Note Trust,
as Issuer, as amended (the "Transfer and Servicing Agreement"), does hereby
certify that:

     1. A review of the activities of FNCCC from January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008 (the "Reporting Period") and of its performance under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Transfer and Servicing Agreement has
been made under my supervision; and

     2. To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, FNCCC has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Transfer
and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.

----------
(2)  On December 18, 2008 (the "Certificate Trust Termination Date"), the
     Transferor exercised its option to terminate First Bankcard Master Credit
     Card Trust and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. On and after the
     Certificate Trust Termination Date, the Receivables are serviced by the
     Servicer as provided in the Transfer and Servicing Agreement.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Servicer Compliance Statement the
day and year first written above.

                                        FIRST NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD CENTER,
                                        INC.


                                        By /s/ Stephen F. Eulie
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stephen F. Eulie
                                           President


                                        FIRST NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD CENTER,
                                        INC.


                                        By /s/ Patrick J. Burns, Sr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick J. Burns, Sr.
                                           Chief Financial Officer
|ABN AMRO Series 2002 4Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders
for 200201 to 200212
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Class                                                                                                                       
|R 1                                                                                                                         
|A 1                                                                                                                         
|A 10                                                                                                                        
|A 11                                                                                                                        
|A 12                                                                                                                        
|A 2                                                                                                                         
|A 3                                                                                                                         
|A 4                                                                                                                         
|A 5                                                                                                                         
|A 6                                                                                                                         
|A 7                                                                                                                         
|A 8                                                                                                                         
|A 9                                                                                                                         
|A P                                                                                                                         
|A X                                                                                                                         
|B 1                                                                                                                         
|B 2                                                                                                                         
|B 3                                                                                                                         
|B 4                                                                                                                         
|B 5                                                                                                                         
|GF 2                                                                                                                        
|M                                                                                                                           
|R 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

Triad Hospitals, Inc
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                             2000      1999        1998        1997       1996
<S>                                                        <C>       <C>         <C>         <C>       <C>
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before
  minority interests and income taxes                      $  26.3   $ (112.4)   $ (113.9)   $ (14.7)   $ 127.3
Fixed charges, exclusive of capitalized interest              72.5       78.9        82.4       73.6       64.5
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
Income as adjusted                                         $  98.8   $  (33.5)   $  (31.5)   $  58.9    $ 191.8
                                                           =====================================================

Fixed Charges:
Interest charged to expense                                $  62.2   $   67.7    $   68.9    $  60.5    $  52.0
Portion of rents representative of interest                   10.3       11.2        13.5       13.1       12.5
                                                              72.5       78.9        82.4       73.6       64.5
Interest expense included in cost of plant construction        1.7         -          1.7        0.4        0.6
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                                           $  74.2   $   78.9    $   84.1    $  74.0    $  65.1
                                                           =====================================================

Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges                            1.3     (A)         (A)         (A)          3.0
                                                           =====================================================
</TABLE>

(A)  Triad's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $112.4
     million, $115.6 million and $15.1 million for the year ended December 31,
     1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.A

- L.H., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.W., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 332 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2117]



[[Page 5333]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Safety and Occupational Health Study Section (SOHSS), National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:
    Times and Dates:
8 a.m.-5 p.m., February 17, 2010. (Closed)
8 a.m.-5 p.m., February 18, 2010. (Closed)

    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, 
Virginia 22314, Telephone (703) 684-5900, Fax (703) 684-1403.
    Status: These portions of the meeting will be closed to the public 
in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, pursuant to Section 10(d) Public Law 92-463.
    Purpose: The Safety and Occupational Health Study Section will 
review, discuss, and evaluate grant application(s) received in response 
to the Institute's standard grants review and funding cycles pertaining 
to research issues in occupational safety and health, and allied areas.
    It is the intent of NIOSH to support broad-based research endeavors 
in keeping with the Institute's program goals. This will lead to 
improved understanding and appreciation for the magnitude of the 
aggregate health burden associated with occupational injuries and 
illnesses, as well as to support more focused research projects, which 
will lead to improvements in the delivery of occupational safety and 
health services, and the prevention of work-related injury and illness. 
It is anticipated that research funded will promote these program 
goals.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will convene to address 
matters related to the conduct of Study Section business and for the 
study section to consider safety and occupational health-related grant 
applications.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    For More Information Contact: Price Connor, PhD, NIOSH Health 
Scientist, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-20, Atlanta, Georgia 
30333, Telephone (404) 498-2511, Fax (404) 498-2571.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: January 25, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-2117 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-5164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versusALBERTO PARRA-MONTALVO, a/k/a Alberto ParraServantes, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-05-151) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael E. Archenbronn, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alberto Parra-Montalvo appeals his conviction and seventy-two month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) (2000). Parra-Montalvo’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 739 (1967), raising the argument that the sentence was not reasonable, but stating that he finds no meritorious grounds for appeal. The Government did not file an answering brief, and although advised of his right to do so, Parra-Montalvo did not file a pro se supplemental brief. As required by Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. The district court sentenced Parra-Montalvo within the properly calculated sentencing guidelines range, United States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449, 455-56 (4th Cir. 2006), and considered the factors provided in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). We find Parra-Montalvo’s sentence of seventy-two months to be reasonable. We therefore affirm his conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Parra-Montalvo, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Parra-Montalvo requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition- 3 - would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Parra-Montalvo. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**INVISA,
      INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Invisa, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen A. Michael,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:





1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













*/s/* Carl A.
      Parks


Carl
      A.
      Parks


President
      & Chief Operating Officer


August
      9,
      2006