alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                  FORM 8-K/A

                                CURRENT REPORT


                      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


     Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)          May 10, 1999
                                                               ------------

                     FIRST USA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         (As Servicer on behalf of FIRST USA CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST)
<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>                             <C>
  Laws of the United States                         33-99362                       51-0269396
  -------------------------                         --------                       ----------
(State or other jurisdiction                (Commission File Number)       (IRS Employer Identification
 of incorporation or                                                                 Number)
   organization)
</TABLE>
201 North Walnut Street, Wilmington, Delaware                           19801
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                              (Zip Code)

                302/594-4117
--------------------------------------------------
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

                                      N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
                         if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events.

     The Registrant hereby amends and restates in its entirety Exhibit 99.05 as
previously filed on May 19, 1999 on a Form 8-K dated as of May 10, 1999.

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits

     (99.05)   Monthly Certificateholders' Statement of the Trust which contains
               information relating to the Series 1995-2 Certificates.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                FIRST USA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                As Servicer


                                By:   /s/ Tracie H.Klein
                                    --------------------
                                Name:  Tracie H. Klein
                                Title: First Vice President



Date:  May 16, 2000
       ------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7231

JAMES ALFRED BROWN, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Wallens Ridge State Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-792-7)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Alfred Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Alfred Brown, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Warden, No. CA-00-792-7 (W.D.

Va. filed July 3, 2001; entered July 5, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 97-40769 Summary Calendar

_______________________ RONALD T. CALDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROY L. BRACKENS, ET AL, Defendants, ROY L. BRACKENS, Correctional Officer, Michael Unit; TIM R.

HUFFMAN, Correctional Officer, Michael Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:96-CV-581)

_________________________________________________________________ July 13, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

The appe llant alleges that his injuries from an altercation with prison guards were more than de minimis and that2

he has therefore stated a claim for unconstitutional use of excessive force. We disagree.

A few bruises and 1-cm. scratch are not injuries of constitutional dimension. Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 1997). The magistrate judge correctly dismissed Caldwell’s claim as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

AFFIRMED .
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61441-61442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24566]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2007-0042]


Canadian Standards Association; Reinstated Recognition for 
Product Test Standard

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Reinstating recognition for product test standard.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration's continued recognition of the Canadian Standards 
Association for a test standard.

DATES: Recognition for the reinstated standard is effective July 3, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryAnn Garrahan, Director, Office of 
Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, 
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210, 
or phone (202) 693-2110. Our Web page includes information about the 
NRTL Program

[[Page 61442]]

(see http://www.osha.gov and select ``N'' in the site index).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice of Correction

    The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) was recognized by OSHA as 
a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory on December 24, 1992 (57 FR 
61452). The notice which announced this recognition included a list of 
test standards that became part of CSA's scope of recognition. In 
general, NRTLs use such test standards to test and certify products 
that OSHA requires to be approved before use in the workplace. One of 
the test standards included in CSA's initial scope was UL 1563, which 
is now titled Electric Spas, Equipment Assemblies, and Associated 
Equipment. At the time, its title was Electric Hot Tubs, Spas, and 
Associated Equipment. In compliance with its regulations, OSHA renewed 
CSA's recognition on July 3, 2001 (66 FR 35271). OSHA, however, 
inadvertently omitted UL 1563 from the Federal Register notice 
published for the CSA renewal. As a result, OSHA is reinstating UL 1563 
to CSA's scope of recognition. CSA's capability to test and certify 
products to this standard has existed since the time of its recognition 
in December 1992.
    This reinstatement is the only change that OSHA is making to CSA's 
recognition through this notice. All other terms and conditions of its 
recognition remain the same.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of October 2008.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E8-24566 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
#### Ex parte John Charles WILLIAMS.

No. 47181.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 3, 1973.

Kerry P. Fitzgerald, Dallas, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is a post conviction habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Appellant contends that he was not properly admonished under the provisions of Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P.

The record reflects that appellant entered pleas of guilty before Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County, on January 14, 1972, in Cause No. C-71-8943-LK for the offense of embezzlement of money over the value of $50, in Cause No. C-71-5558IK for the offense of being an exconvict *173carrying a pistol and in Cause No. C-71-9693-LK for the offense of robbery by assault and was assessed punishment at five, ten and twenty-five years, respectively.

The convicting court, in compliance with Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P., has held a hearing and entered findings: “The Record does not show that the court made any determination that Petitioner’s pleas of guilty were ‘uninfluenced by any consideration of fear, or by any persuasion — prompting him to confess his guilt,’ ” and concluded that appellant’s allegations (in his application for writ of habeas corpus) are supported by the record.

The record reflects that, after appellant was admonished by the court as to the range of punishment in each of the three cases, the following occurred:

> “The Court: You’re not pleading guilty in any of these cases in the hope that you will be pardoned or paroled, are you?

> “The Defendant: No.”

The transcription of the court reporter’s notes fails to reflect that the trial court made a determination of whether appellant’s pleas of guilty were uninfluenced by any consideration of fear or by any persuasion prompting him to confess his guilt before accepting the pleas of guilty. We conclude that the convicting court’s findings, at the writ hearing, are supported by the record. The terms of Article 26.13, V. A.C.C.P., dictate that appellant is entitled to the relief he seeks. See the cases collated under Article 26.13, supra.

The appellant is ordered released from further confinement by virtue of his convictions in Causes numbered C-71-8943LK, C-71-5558-IK and C-71-9693-LK and surrendered to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County to answer the indictments in said causes.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                     FIRST USA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                       BANC ONE CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST


The undersigned, duly authorized representatives of First USA Bank, National
Association ("First USA"), as Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 1, 1994 (as may be amended and supplemented, the
"Agreement"), between First USA, as Seller and Servicer, and Bankers Trust
Company, as Trustee, do hereby certify as follows:

1.   First USA is, as of the date hereof, Servicer under the Agreement.
     Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings
     as set forth in the Agreement.

2.   The undersigned are Servicing Officers who are duly authorized pursuant to
     the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

3.   A review of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2000, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted
     under our supervision.

4.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of our knowledge,
     performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations
     has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5.

5.   The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
     Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to us to
     have been made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, which sets
     forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken
     by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current
     status of each such default: None

6.   The report required to be delivered to the Servicer by the independent
     certified public accountants pursuant to subsection 3.06(b) of the Pooling
     and Servicing Agreement has been delivered to the Servicer, and such report
     contains no exceptions, except for such exceptions as the independent
     certified public accountants believe to be immaterial and as set forth in
     paragraph 7 below.

7.   The following is each exception set forth in the report required to be
     delivered to the Servicer by the independent certified public accountants
     pursuant to subsection 3.06(b) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement: None

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate this
23rd day of March, 2001.
--------    -----------

FIRST USA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 as Servicer




By: /s/Tracie H. Klein               By: /s/Jeffrey Rigg
    ----------------------------         --------------------------------------
    Name:  Tracie H. Klein               Name:  Jeffrey Rigg
    Title: First Vice President          Title: Senior Vice President-Accounting
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

August 7, 2020

Order 

Clerk

August 7, 2020

161753(44)

PRIORITIES USA and RISE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

SC: 161753

v COA: 354096

Ct of Claims: 19-000191-MZ 

SECRETARY OF STATE, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and SENATE,

Intervening Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions for the temporary admission of out-ofstate attorneys Jacki Anderson, Amanda J. Beane, Marc Elias, Kevin Hamilton, and Jyoti 

Jasrasaria to appear and practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A) are GRANTED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD FINE, M.D.

September 5, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 4.2

            FORM OF STOCK CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK

                                    [FRONT]

Number                                                                    Shares

------                                                                    ------


                 Organized under the law of the State of Texas


                             ENB BANKSHARES, INC.

                              Voting Common Stock

             Authorized Shares 1,000,000 Par Value $5.00 Per Share

          THIS CERTIFIES THAT _________________________________ is the
registered holder of ______________________________________ Shares of the fully
paid and nonassessible capital stock of ENB Bankshares, Inc. transferable only
on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney
upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. In Witness Whereof, the
said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed, this ________ day of
_________________, A.D. 20________.

___________________________________       ________________________________
Patrick Adams, Secretary                  Harold Campbell, President

                             [Seal of Corporation]

                                    [BACK]

NOTICE:  THE  SIGNATURE  OF THIS  ASSIGNMENT
MUST  CORRESPOND  WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


For value received _______________________________ hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto___________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________ shares of the
capital stock represented by the within certificate and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint ________________________________________________________
Attorney, to transfer said stock on the books of the within named corporation
with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated ________________________


                                      __________________________________

In presence of

__________________________________
#### Edwin C. IPOCK, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Albert H. Handley, Bankrupt, and Frank F. Fagan, Receiver of Wayne National Bank, Appellants, v. Albert H. HANDLEY, Bankrupt, Appellee.

No. 4244.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 11, 1937.

Ehringhaus, Royall, Gosney & Smith, of Raleigh, N. G, for appellants.

J. Faison Thomson, of Goldsboro, N. G, and Rivers D. Johnson, of Warsaw, N. G, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Order dismissing appeal in accordance with stipulation and agreement of the parties filed.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                               September 6, 2000

     Efficient Networks, Inc.
     4849 Alpha Road
     Dallas, TX 75244

          Re:    Registration Statement on Form S-8

     Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed by
     you with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about September 6,
     2000 (the "Registration Statement") in connection with your assumption of
     the Network Telesystems, Inc. 1993 Stock Plan (the "NTS Plan") and the
     registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of 125,773
     shares of your Common Stock reserved for issuance thereunder.  As your
     legal counsel, we have examined the proceedings taken and are familiar with
     the proceedings proposed to be taken by you in connection with the sale and
     issuance of such Common Stock under the NTS Plan.

          It is our opinion that, when issued and sold in the respective manners
     referred to in the Plan and pursuant to the agreements which accompany the
     Plan, the Common Stock issued and sold thereby will be legally and validly
     issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

          We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
     Registration Statement and further consent to the use of our name wherever
     appearing in the Registration Statement, including any amendments thereto.

                              Sincerely,

                              WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
                              Professional Corporation

                              /s/ Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 11, 2010*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.3 Credit Market Debt Owed by Financial Sectors** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 10.2

               AMENDMENT TWELVE TO INSURANCE PROCESSING AGREEMENT

This document is Amendment Twelve to the Insurance Processing Agreement made and
entered into effective June 1, 1993, and amended by Amendment One to Insurance
Processing Agreement dated June 4, 1998; Amendment Two to Insurance Processing
Agreement dated September 25, 1998; Amendment Three to Insurance Processing
Agreement dated October 19, 1998; Amendment Four to Insurance Processing
Agreement dated December 15, 1998, Amendment Five to Insurance Processing
Agreement dated March 25, 1999, Amendment Six to Insurance Processing Agreement
dated May 10, 1999, Amendment Seven to Insurance Processing Agreement dated June
24, 1999, Amendment Eight to Insurance Processing Agreement dated August 5,
1999, Amendment Nine to Insurance Processing Agreement dated October 1, 1999,
Amendment Ten to Insurance Processing Agreement dated January 31, 2000, and
Amendment Eleven to Insurance Processing Agreement dated March 1, 2000 (the
"Agreement"), by and between American National Insurance Company ("American
National") a Texas corporation, and Legacy Insurance Processing Group ("LMG"), a
California corporation.

In consideration of mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:

1.     Section 6.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the
       following new Section 6.1 shall be substituted therefore:

       "6.1 Subject to termination as hereinafter provided, this Agreement shall
       remain in force and effect until the close of business on July 31, 2000,
       the term of this Agreement. This Agreement may be renewed by mutual
       agreement for additional successive terms of one (1) year unless
       terminated by either party by prior written notice to the other at least
       one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the end of the initial term or the
       renewal term."

2.     Except as specifically amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the
       Insurance Processing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


       <TABLE>
       <CAPTION>
       LEGACY MARKETING GROUP                            AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE
                                                         COMPANY
       <S>                                         <C>
       By:         /s/ David A. Skup               By:         /s/ David A. Behrens
                   -----------------                           --------------------

       Title:      Chief Financial Officer         Title:      Executive V. P. of Independent Marketing
                   -----------------------                     ----------------------------------------

       Witness:    /s/ Galina Coleman              Witness:    /s/ Lori Hererra
                   ------------------                          ----------------

       Date:       April 19, 2000                  Date:       April 27, 2000
                   --------------                              --------------
       </TABLE>
MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS PCAOB REGISTERED      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-SB/A of Natco International Inc., of our report dated August 22, 2008 on our audit of the financial statements of Natco International Inc. as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended and from inception through March 31, 2007, and the reference to us under the caption Experts.         /s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered Moore & Associates Chartered Las Vegas, Nevada August 22, 2008                    2675 S. Jones Blvd. Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501