alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1917 

To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes of making 

claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 

note) based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. BAUCUS, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes 

of making claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) based on exposure 

to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF IDAHO AND MONTANA IN RADI4 ATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION. 

5 Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Com6 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

8 after the semicolon; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1917 IS

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

2 after the semicolon; and 

3 (3) by adding after subparagraph (C) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(D) the State of Idaho; and 

6 ‘‘(E) the State of Montana; and’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with  the Quarterly Report  of The Heritage Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB  for the period  ending February 29, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Vickie Walker, Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.




/s/ Vickie Walker
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

April 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2
      Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
          Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Howard Abrams, Chief Financial Officer of Java Express, Inc. certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Java Express,
Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

           a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared.

           b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

           c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

           a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

           b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date: July 13, 2006


/s/ Howard Abrams
______________________________________
Howard Abrams
Chief Financial Officer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2084 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require the Secretary 

of the Interior to publish and make available for public comment a 

draft economic analysis at the time a proposed rule to designate critical 

habitat is published. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2014 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Ms. LANDRIEU) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require 

the Secretary of the Interior to publish and make available for public comment a draft economic analysis at 

the time a proposed rule to designate critical habitat 

is published. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Protection 

5 Act of 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2084 IS

1 SEC. 2. DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR CRITICAL HABI2 TAT DESIGNATION. 

3 Section 4(b)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 

4 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘(2) The 

6 Secretary shall’’ and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(2) CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall’’; 

9 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘The 

10 Secretary may’’ and inserting the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The Secretary shall’’; 

12 and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(C) DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS.—At the 

15 time a proposed rule to designate critical habi16 tat is published, the Secretary shall publish and 

17 make available for public comment a draft anal18 ysis that— 

19 ‘‘(i) examines the public and private 

20 economic effects of the proposed designa21 tion, including any effects on— 

22 ‘‘(I) possible uses of land and 

23 property values; 

24 ‘‘(II) employment; and 

25 ‘‘(III) revenues available for 

26 State and local governments; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2084 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) is quantitative.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 09, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 09, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0006. PHILLIP T. ALDREDGE v. ERICA BYRD.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2013SV0037
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6166

JOHN MARK BERRILL, Petitioner - Appellant, versusPATRICK KEOHANE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1191-AM) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: July 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Mark Berrill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on December 15, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on December 18, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: John Mark Berrill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Berrill v. Keohane , No. CA-98-1191-AM (Dec. 18, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| (1)   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                                                        |                                          |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                                        |
|                         |                                                                   |                                     |
| DATE:              March 30, 2007 |                                                                        | /s/              Wade              R. Bradley |
|                              | Wade              R. Bradley                                                |
|                              | Chief                Executive OfficerEAU                Technologies, Inc. |

----
#### STATE v. FERGUSON

No. 27P01

Case below: 140 N.C. App. 699

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 February 2001.

Justice Edmunds recused.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2130 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to temporarily waive certain vehicle 

weight limits for covered logging vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to temporarily 

waive certain vehicle weight limits for covered logging 

vehicles, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Winter Roads Safety 

5 Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY WAIVER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—During the period beginning on 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the 

9 date on which the Commissioner of the Minnesota DepartVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:09 Mar 18, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2130.IS S2130

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2130 IS

1 ment of Transportation terminates the seasonal vehicle 

2 weight limit increase in the North Zone in accordance with 

3 section 169.826 of the Minnesota Statutes, the Secretary 

4 of Transportation shall waive, for a covered logging vehi5 cle, the application of any vehicle weight limit established 

6 under section 127 of title 23, United States Code. 

7 (b) INSPECTION REQUIREMENT.—Notwithstanding 

8 subsection (a), a waiver described in such subsection may 

9 not be granted until the bridges along the road segments 

10 described in subsection (c)(4) have been inspected and cer11 tified by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to 

12 be structurally capable of supporting vehicles with a gross 

13 vehicle weight of 99,000 pounds. 

14 (c) DEFINED TERM.—In this section, the term ‘‘cov15 ered logging vehicle’’ means a vehicle that— 

16 (1) is transporting raw or unfinished forest 

17 products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass, or wood 

18 chips; 

19 (2) has a gross vehicle weight of not more than 

20 99,000 pounds; 

21 (3) has not fewer than 6 axles; 

22 (4) is operating on a segment of— 

23 (A) Interstate Route 35 in Minnesota be24 tween mile marker 235.4 and mile marker 

25 259.552; or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2130 IS

1 (B) Interstate Route 535 in Minnesota be2 tween mile marker 0 and mile marker 1.571; 

3 and 

4 (5) has obtained the appropriate overweight ve5 hicle permit from the Minnesota Department of 

6 Transportation. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Iionomble Hazel Ii. 5eckham, Eay 12, 183S, Page 2 

by conveyance, will, or otherwise, 

and hold cr dispose of the ssme or apnly it to any purpose, public or private, as it sees fit. The power of 

the State in respect to its ?ro-perty 

right is vested in the Legislature, and 

the Legislature alone can exercise the 

power necessary to.the enjoyment and 

;)rotection of those rights, by the enacticent of st?.tutes for that ?ur_nose..... 

The state has, in general the snue power 

to oontraot as a oorpoxation or an fndivldual.' St! Cya,, p. 868, 871.* 

In this oonnmtion we oall your &ttanticn 43 an 

act 0r the LeglslatureJ gassea in 1e ahloh prohlblta the 

um of shy pert of the Btste Capitol btildlag,with 

aertaln ex~eptlofl8, for prlrPte pdrpmis. we quote~thle 

l3tatnta In rull: 

Of &ur**, may et any tlmu it 666s tit said tbs abovs 

8tatutt3 0r pa68 a -W ftttat0 p033cixtting taf3 list3 0r 8 

part 0r the 8tate Capitol btildlng r0r the ptepoees mntioned in your Lettw: 

It ia‘, thererora, our opinion that the hgI8lalawe 

of Texas hag ample authority to authorbe the State Ward 

of Control to allow et blind person ta operate a oigar, oigarette, magazine and confectionery stand in the State Capitol. 

You are further advIsed, It ie our opinion that 

the, us8 of a portion 0r the State Gapit01 building for the 
&nomble Hazel H. Beokha& I&y 12, 1939, Page 3 

poses mntioned in your letter is now prohibited by law; 

but the Legislature my, by enacting another stntute or 

amending the above rgoted stn.tute, authorize the 

a portion of the State Capitol building for such 

poses. 

use of 

purVery truly yours
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7136]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “Ivory Mirror Case,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about September 15, 2010, until on or about September 15, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: August 23, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-21590 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0571. COURTNEY JAMAL CLINTON v. THE STATE.

Following a bench trial, the court entered a verdict finding Courtney Jamal

Clinton guilty of habitually impaired driving and three other offenses to which

Clinton stipulated guilt. However, the trial court expressly withheld sentencing until

a later time. Clinton then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction because the

challenged order is interlocutory. 

Although the trial court found Clinton guilty, it has not entered a judgment of

conviction and has not imposed a sentence. Accordingly, the case remains pending

below, and Clinton was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures of

OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to obtain appellate review at this time. See Keller v. State, 275

Ga. 680 (571 SE2d 806) (2002) (a criminal case remains pending until the court

enters a written judgment of conviction and sentence); Crolley v. State, 182 Ga. App.

2 (1) (354 SE2d 864) (1987) (a criminal proceeding is pending until the court enters

a written sentence). Clinton’s failure to follow the requisite procedures deprives us

of jurisdiction to consider his appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/23/2015

December 23, 2015
,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### wa are in rraalp ia whloh you robnit 

### the foraa oplntonr

WoulJ a trJs 3ohoolDlrraid trurtoe 

### year ae trur

### ClYil atetuter, 

### 1925, 8# IO trurtea who cannot for #lx math8 prior to hlr 

### rldl~ no perwn rhallba purl

### oo unlrroho 

### loa proportftaxItttrlat to which 

### ho lo olaotod l l qualifiad

‘voter in raid

### dirIn ouropinion No. o-425, wo ruledthat it 

### war naoeawry for l person to 

### hold a poll tax 

### rroriptIn orbe? to qualifT (t8 a sohool 6rartrr of a oornaoa rahool dirtriot. 

### Thlr oplnlon 

### 18 supportedby numrou8 

### priordoola~0~8by I thtr 

### drpar6arnt.,

.:

Hon. B. Y. Whitware, Paga 2

Thlr department rulrd in 

### an opinion addressed to Honorable fin B. Dyer, 

### datedApril 20, 1935, Lottar Book, Volume 363, pagr 590, that the frllurr to obtain a poll tax rsoelpt for subrrqurnt years would not disqualify IItrustrr who was duly qualified when aleotad to the oitloo of 00-n school trueteo. In that opinion it wes statod:

wA poll tar 1s rssantlal before ons la qualified to hold this posltlon. Howover, it appoaro that Ylsa Terre11 at the tlmr of her l lootlon and at tho time Of quallrlcatlon was qasllflad in thlr rtspeot, and wa ars of tho opinion that her falling to obtain a poll tax for the year 1935 1s lsmatrrlal, and that rho 1s still a duly quallrled and acting trustee insofar as the poll tax 

### pharela concernad. Thr reason for this rule 1s apparent. 

### xi euoh wsra not tha case, there would br 

### a oonetant disorder on thr various boards by one lnadrertantly railing to obtain a poll tax. w 

### A similar ruling was madr in an opinion to Honorable Wordlow Lena, dated April 18, 1935, Volums 363, page 323.

i% have aonsldarsd the controlling rtatutes and the former opinions by this department, and are of the opinion that a school trustaa in a commonschool Qlstriot, slsctsd 1~ 1939 and who mat all of ths requirements prasarlbed by Artlolo 2745 at ths time of his rlsotlon and qualification as such tru8teb, would not be dlsquallflrd and subject to repoval, by reason of his failure to pay his poll tax ror subsequent years during hla trr;r! of orfios. Very truly yourr

Assls tant 

### CCC/or APPROVEDMAY3, 1940

APPROVED **OPINION** 

# 0 CoMMlrrEC Ew- C**r.“*Y