alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|                      | KPMGLLP   |                | 
|--------------------- | --------- | -------------- | 
|Chartered Accountants | Telephone | (403) 691-8000
|2700-205 5 Avenue SW  | Telefax   | (403) 691-8008
|Calgary AB T2P 4B9    | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca   

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of MegaWest Energy Corp.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 20-F
of:

- our auditors' report dated August 28, 2008 on the consolidated balance
  sheet of MegaWest Energy Corp. (the "Company") as at April 30, 2008 and 2007
  and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit, comprehensive loss
  and accumulated other comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years
  in the two-year period ended April 30, 2008;
- our audit report on the reconciliation to United States GAAP dated August
  28, 2008;
- our comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on
  Canada-United States of America Reporting Differences dated August 28, 2008;
  and
- our report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated August
  28, 2008 on the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
  April 30, 2008,

each of which is contained in this annual report on Form 20-F
of the Company for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008.

Calgary, Canada August 29, 2008

| | KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability
      partnership and a member firm of the KPMG            
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | network of independent member firms affiliated
      with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
| | KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP                                                         

---
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David B. Snow, Jr., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medco Health Solutions, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2012

|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|      
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ David B. Snow, Jr.              
|Name:  |  | David B. Snow, Jr.                  
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated CapitalInstitutional Properties/3, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chiefexecutive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalentof the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Packaging Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Phillip D. Harris, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Henry C.
Newell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ PHILLIP D. HARRIS
------------------------------------
Name: Phillip D. Harris
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 27, 2003

 /s/ HENRY C. NEWELL
------------------------------------
Name: Henry C. Newell
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 27, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 215 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 215

  To ensure that the Federal Reserve conducts its policies to ensure 
         long-term price stability and a low rate of inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2013

Mr. Corker (for himself and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure that the Federal Reserve conducts its policies to ensure 
         long-term price stability and a low rate of inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Reserve Single Mandate Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT.

    Section 2A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 225a) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``maximum employment, stable prices,'' and 
        inserting ``long-term price stability, a low rate of 
        inflation,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``The Board shall 
        establish an explicit numerical definition of the term `long-
        term price stability' and shall maintain monetary policy that 
        effectively promotes such long-term price stability.''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 47th District Court of Potter County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on March 15,

2018, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

James Wade Holley v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-17-00256-CR Trial Court Number: 73,596-A

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 15, 2018, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on May 31, 2018.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2263 

To appropriately limit the authority to award bonuses to employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2014 

Ms. AYOTTE (for herself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To appropriately limit the authority to award bonuses to 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Wasteful Federal 

5 Bonuses Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BONUSES. 

7 (a) ADVERSE FINDINGS AND EMPLOYEES UNDER IN8 VESTIGATION.—Chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2263 IS

1 ‘‘Subchapter IV—Limitations on Bonus 

2 Authority 

3 ‘‘§ 4531. Certain forms of misconduct 

4 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

5 ‘‘(1) the term ‘adverse finding’ relating to an 

6 employee means a determination that the conduct of 

7 the employee— 

8 ‘‘(A) violated a policy of the agency for 

9 which the employee may be removed or sus10 pended; or 

11 ‘‘(B) violated a law for which the employee 

12 may be imprisoned of more than 1 year; 

13 ‘‘(2) the term ‘agency’ has the meaning given 

14 that term under section 551; and 

15 ‘‘(3) the term ‘bonus’ means any bonus or cash 

16 award, including— 

17 ‘‘(A) an award under this chapter; 

18 ‘‘(B) an award under section 5384; and 

19 ‘‘(C) a retention bonus under section 5754. 

20 ‘‘(b) ADVERSE FINDINGS.— 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The head of an agency 

22 shall not award a bonus to an employee of the agen23 cy until 5 years after the end of the fiscal year in 

24 which the Inspector General or another senior ethics 

25 official of the agency or the Comptroller General of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2263 IS

1 the United States makes an adverse finding relating 

2 to the employee. 

3 ‘‘(2) PREVIOUSLY AWARDED BONUSES.—If the 

4 Inspector General or another senior ethics official of 

5 the agency or the Comptroller General of the United 

6 States makes an adverse finding relating to an em7 ployee, the head of the agency employing the em8 ployee, after notice and an opportunity for a hear9 ing, shall issue an order directing the employee to 

10 repay the amount of any bonus awarded to the em11 ployee during the year during which the adverse 

12 finding is made.’’. 

13 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

14 The table of sections for chapter 45 of title 5, United 

15 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol16 lowing: 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER IV—LIMITATIONS ON BONUS AUTHORITY

‘‘4531. Certain forms of misconduct.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MARK CHASMAR v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN.

December 18, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2087 

To protect the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act with respect to reconciliation involving changes to the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2014 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Ms. WARREN, Mrs. 

HAGAN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mr. BEGICH) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Budget 

A BILL 

To protect the Medicare program under title XVIII of the 

Social Security Act with respect to reconciliation involving changes to the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Protection 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

7 It is the sense of the Senate that— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2087 IS

1 (1) the eligibility age under the Medicare pro2 gram under title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

3 (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) should not be increased; 

4 and 

5 (2) the Medicare program should not be 

6 privatized or turned into a voucher system. 

7 SEC. 3. RECONCILIATION INVOLVING CHANGES TO THE 

8 MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

9 Section 313(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget and 

10 Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 644(b)(1)) 

11 is amended— 

12 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

13 the end; 

14 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period 

15 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(G) a provision shall be considered extra18 neous if it eliminates or reduces guaranteed 

19 benefits for individuals entitled to, or enrolled 

20 for, benefits under the Medicare program under 

21 title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 

22 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) or restricts eligibility for 

23 such program.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2137 

AN ACT 

To ensure that holders of flood insurance policies under 

the National Flood Insurance Program do not receive 

premium refunds for coverage of second homes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2137 ES

1 SECTION 1. NO REFUNDS UNDER NATIONAL FLOOD INSUR2 ANCE PROGRAM FOR COVERAGE OF SECOND 

3 HOMES. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘National 

5 Flood Insurance Program’’ means the program estab6 lished under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 

7 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.). 

8 (b) NO REFUNDS FOR COVERAGE OF SECOND

9 HOMES.—Notwithstanding section 3(a)(4) of the Home10 owner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 or any 

11 other provision of law, in the case of flood insurance cov12 erage under the National Flood Insurance Program for 

13 a residential property that is not the primary residence 

14 of an individual (as that term is used in section 

15 1307(a)(2)(A) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

16 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4014(a)(2)(A))), the Administrator of 

17 the Federal Emergency Management Agency may not re18 fund any premium for such coverage collected in excess 

19 of the rates required under the provisions of, and amend20 ments made by, section 3 of the Homeowner Flood Insur21 ance Affordability Act of 2014. 

Passed the Senate March 13, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2137 

AN ACT 

To ensure that holders of flood insurance policies 

ond homes. not receive premium refunds for coverage of secunder the National Flood Insurance Program do
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21510]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Final Interpretative Rule: Interpretation of Children's Product.
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: August 24, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21510 Filed 8-25-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### Lindell O’Dell STEVENSON and Eddie Ray Stevenson, Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 16, 1973.

E. W. Rivers, Paducah, for appellants.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., G. Edward James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for ap-pellee.

Memorandum Opinion by

Commissioner CATINNA,

Reversing.*

*

 Opinion ordered not to be published.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANA MCGEE.

October 15, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner 

v. 

ROLANDO VICENTE LEE 

a/k/a Roland Lee 

*

* 

IN THE

* COURT OF APPEALS

*

* 

* 

OF MARYLAND 

* Misc. Docket AG

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

No._8_5 __

September Term, 2016 

Respondent 

****************************************····························· 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Discipline by Consent, in which Respondent 

admits he violated Rules 1 .4, l .S(a), SJ(b), S.S(a), and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules of 

Professional Conduct, as enumerated at the time of the conduct, it is this 30th day of 

_ ___:J:....:a=n=u=a"'-r.J.-y __ , 2017; 

ORDERED, that Respondent, Rolando Vicente Lee, a/k/a Roland Lee, is hereby 

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for 120 days effective March 1, 

2017; and it is further, 

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Rolando Vicente Lee 

from the register of attorneys in the Court, effective March 1, 2017, and certify that fact to the 

Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State 

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761. 

Isl Clayton Greene Jr. 

Seriior Judge
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1909 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage, 

as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of home needle removal, decontamination, and disposal devices and the disposal of needles 

and syringes through a sharps-by-mail or similar program under part 

D of the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2007 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for coverage, as supplies associated with the injection 

of insulin, of home needle removal, decontamination, and 

disposal devices and the disposal of needles and syringes 

through a sharps-by-mail or similar program under part 

D of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Safe Needle 

5 Disposal Coverage Act of 2007’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 1909 IS

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF HOME NEEDLE REMOVAL, DECON2 TAMINATION, AND DISPOSAL DEVICES AND 

3 DISPOSAL OF NEEDLES AND SYRINGES 

4 THROUGH A SHARPS-BY-MAIL OR SIMILAR 

5 PROGRAM UNDER MEDICARE PART D. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–2(e)(1)(B) of the 

7 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)(1)(B)) is 

8 amended by inserting after ‘‘regulations of the Secretary’’ 

9 the following: ‘‘and including devices approved for home 

10 use by the Food and Drug Administration for the safe 

11 and effective removal, decontamination, and disposal of 

12 needles and the disposal of needles and syringes through 

13 a sharps-by-mail or similar program as medically appro14 priate based on volume of usage’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, John S. Chen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sybase, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: May 9, 2007       /s/ JOHN S. CHEN
#### H. P. WILLOUGHBY, d/b/a Thriftway Market v. SHOPPERS CHOICE SUPERMARKETS, INC.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 2, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1973.

H. P. Willoughby, pro se,

Harry B. Miller, Jr., Miller, Griffin & Marks, Lexington, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice STEINFELD,

Affirming.*

*

Opinion ordered not to be published.