alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,295
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                31,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     51,691
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        127,934
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,099
<DEPOSITS>                                     197,913
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,603
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                860
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 230,099
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,511
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  712
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   258
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,481
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,535
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,612
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,869
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         296
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,261
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,524
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,600
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James Briscoe, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Liberty Star Uranium
      & Metals Corp. for the period ended January 31, 2010 (the Report)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Liberty Star Uranium & Metals
Corp.                                                                

Dated: May 12, 2010



/s/ James
BriscoeJames Briscoe President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, and Director(Principal Executive Officer) and
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberty Star
Uranium & Metals Corp. and will be retained by Liberty Star Uranium &
Metals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000769131
<NAME>                        RANCON REALTY FUND V
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         11,295
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,358
<PP&E>                                         50,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 45,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   45,556
<SALES>                                        3,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,706
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,919
<EPS-BASIC>                                    38.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  38.61



</TABLE>
#### Fox *v.*Frank, County Treas., et al.

(No. 25700

Decided November 27, 1935.)

*Mr. Carl D. Sheppard*and *Mr. Jonathan Taylor,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. BricJcer,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. 0. Schuessler,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to Stock Option
Agreement/Michael J. Stevens of Inland Resources Inc. of our report dated March
24, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Inland
Resources Inc. included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Denver, Colorado
August 9, 2000
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,195-01

EX PARTE BILLY AMMONS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 18861-B(1) IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to investigate whether he used or exhibited a

deadly weapon. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334
2

S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s

conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make any other

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: November 5, 2014

Do not publish
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the quarter ended May 1, 2010, of Big Lots, Inc. (the "Company"). I, Joe R. Cooper, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:





(i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 10, 2010





By: /s/ Joe R. CooperJoe R. CooperExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6227

PAUL ADKINS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MICHAEL F. EASLEY; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-98-00681-1) Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Adkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been given to prison officials for mailing. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
2 PER CURIAM: Paul Adkins, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) petitionas untimely and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal of the denial of the § 2254 petition for lack of jurisdiction, because Adkins’ notice of appeal was not timely filed.Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 4, 1999. Adkins’ notice of appeal was filed on October 2, 1999. * Because Adkins failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3Adkins also appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration. However, a Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for appeal. Because the motion merely requested the district court to reconsider a legal issue, relief was not authorized. See United States v. Williams , 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal of this order as well. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 52537)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group; Subcommittee J—Population and Patient-Oriented Training.                    

*Date:*                         October 28, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Westin Alexandria, 400 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ilda M. Mckenna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481,                         *mckennai@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 20, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-21282 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 34.2

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S ATTESTATION REPORT CONCERNING SERVICING
ACTIVITIES OF GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2006

Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the
accompanying Management's Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
Great Lakes' student loan servicing platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, except for 1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(iv),
1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iii), and 1122(d)(4)(x)-(xiii),
which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed
by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based
on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions
and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, and detaining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited
to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company
complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the Great Lakes' student loan servicing platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| | ---------------------

Milwaukee, WI
February 16, 2007
EXHIBIT
31.1



CERTIFICATION



I,
Randall F. Pearson, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2020; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



Date:
September 1, 2020



| | Sundance
    Strategies, Inc.
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | By:                          
| |                              
| |                              
| |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286; NRC-2010-0285]


Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has 
granted the request of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) 
to withdraw its November 17, 2009, application for proposed amendment 
to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 for the Indian 
Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, located in Westchester 
County, New York.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specifications pertaining to the air start system for the emergency 
diesel generators.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on January 26, 
2010 (75 FR 4116). However, by letter dated August 5, 2010, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated November 17, 2009, and the licensee's 
letter dated August 5, 2010, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically 
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) 
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have 
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents 
located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by 
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#443420366a3621372b31362721042a36276a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6d6c2d488d4c3d5c9d3d4c5c3e6c8d4c588c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of August 2010.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John P. Boska,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I-1, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-21265 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>