alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION


PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





This
certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





I,
Timothy J. FitzGerald, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of The Middleby Corporation (the “Registrant”), certify, to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2009 of the Registrant (the “Report”),
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Date:  November
12, 2009





/s/ Timothy J.
FitzGeraldTimothy
      J. FitzGerald
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                        (94,826)
<SECURITIES>                                   256,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               479,086
<PP&E>                                         874,251
<DEPRECIATION>                               (324,691)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,496,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,523,945
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       499,365
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,505,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,496,829
<SALES>                                        916,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               919,527
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,132,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,232,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,232,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,232,447)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 174 

To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent for nonemergency 

intrusive physical examinations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent 

for nonemergency intrusive physical examinations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HEAD START ACT AMENDMENT IMPOSING PA4 RENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NON5 EMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL EXAMINA6 TIONS. 

7 The Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 174 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 657A. PARENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NON2 EMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL EXAMINA3 TIONS. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A Head Start agency shall ob5 tain written parental consent before administration of any 

6 nonemergency intrusive physical examination of a child in 

7 connection with participation in a program under this sub8 chapter. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—The term ‘nonemergency intru10 sive physical examination’ means, with respect to a child, 

11 a physical examination that— 

12 ‘‘(1) is not immediately necessary to protect the 

13 health or safety of the child involved or the health 

14 or safety of another individual; and 

15 ‘‘(2) requires incision or is otherwise invasive, 

16 or involves exposure of private body parts.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7763
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHAHBORN EMMANUEL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-97-288-V, CA-00-411-3) Submitted: February 10, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shahborn Emmanuel, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Shahborn Emmanuel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Emmanuel has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Emmanuel , Nos. CR-97-288-V; CA-00-411-3 (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 12, 2002; entered Sept. 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### TUBE TURNS, INC., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Lilly J. WHEELER, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. SPECIAL FUND, Kentucky Dept. of Labor, v. KY. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION BOARD, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 1, 1974.

James C. Ludwig and Curtis & Rose, Louisville, for appellant Tube Turns, Inc.

Harley N. Blankenship, Louisville, Atty. for appellee and cross-appellant Lilly J. Wheeler.

Gemma Harding, Louisville, counsel for Special Fund.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner CULLEN,

Reversing on Appeal and on Cross-Appeal.*.
BLD-178 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 24-2404

___________

IN RE: TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(Related to W.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2-22-cv-01223)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

September 5, 2024

Before: BIBAS, MATEY, and CHUNG, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: September 17, 2024)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

In July 2024, Todd Robinson filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, asking 

us to direct the District Court to rule on his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2241, or in the alternative, to issue our own ruling on his habeas petition. 

After Robinson filed the mandamus petition, the District Court entered a memorandum 

and order denying his habeas petition. In light of the District Court’s action, this 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as 

moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If 

developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff's personal 

stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested 

relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).1

1 Robinson has appealed from the District Court’s dismissal of his habeas petition. That 

appeal is pending at C.A. No. 24-2579 and will be considered separately.
EXHIBIT
        32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BLUEGATE CORPORATION PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C.
        63.
 
 I,
        Stephen J. Sperco, the Chief Executive Officer of Bluegate Corporation, hereby
        certify that Bluegate Corporation 's periodic report on Form 10-QSB, for
        the
        period ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information
        contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Bluegate
        Corporation.
 
 Date:
                  April 24, 2007
              /s/
              Stephen
                  J. SpercoStephen
                  J. SpercoChief
                  Executive Officer
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-85 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|                 |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-85 LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                   
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                               
|                 |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                     
|                 |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                              
|November 4, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                           
|DATE             |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)
|November 4, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ Michael J. Tuszka                                                                                                                            
|DATE             |  | Michael J. Tuszka,
                  Vice President
                  and Chief Accounting Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer)    

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT          32.1**

**Certification        of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer **

**Pursuant        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**

**Pursuant        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|                                     |                                                    |                                  |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                    |
|                                |                                               |                             |
| Date: August                8, 2006 | By:                                           | /s/ Jay                O. Wright |
|                                     | Jay                  O. Wright, Chief Executive Officer |
|                                     |                                                    |

|                                               |                                                                                           |                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                               |                                                                                           |
|                                          |                                                                                      |                                |
| Date:                August                8, 2006 | By:                                                                                  | /s/ Richard                H. Deily |
|                                               | Richard                  H. Deily, Principal Financial and Accounting                  Officer |
|                                               |                                                                                           |

----
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Titan Global Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bryan
      M. Chance, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Titan Global Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Global Holdings,
      Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Date:
              July 18, 2006
            
            */s/
              Bryan M. Chance*Bryan
              M. ChanceChief
              Financial Officer
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1703 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1703


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2008

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
             To prevent and reduce trafficking in persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trafficking in Persons 
Accountability Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION IN CERTAIN TRAFFICKING OFFENSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1596. Additional jurisdiction in certain trafficking offenses
    ``(a) In General.--In addition to any domestic or extra-territorial 
jurisdiction otherwise provided by law, the courts of the United States 
have extra-territorial jurisdiction over any offense (or any attempt or 
conspiracy to commit an offense) under section 1581, section 1583, 
section 1584, section 1589, section 1590, or section 1591 of this title 
if--
            ``(1) an alleged offender is a national of the United 
        States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
        (as those terms are defined in section 101 of the Immigration 
        and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)); or
            ``(2) an alleged offender is present in the United States, 
        irrespective of the nationality of the alleged offender.
    ``(b) Limitation on Prosecutions of Offenses Prosecuted in Other 
Countries.--No prosecution may be commenced against a person under this 
section if a foreign government, in accordance with jurisdiction 
recognized by the United States, has prosecuted or is prosecuting such 
person for the conduct constituting such offense, except upon the 
approval of the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General (or a 
person acting in either such capacity), which function of approval may 
not be delegated.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1596. Additional jurisdiction in certain trafficking offenses.''.

            Passed the Senate October 1 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.2





                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation in this registration statement of ENB
Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-1, of our report dated January 14, 2000 on the
financial statements of Eagle National Bank as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and
for the years then ended and the period from February 28, 1997 (Inception)
through December 31, 1997. We also consent to the reference to our firm under
the heading "Experts" in the prospectus, which is part of this registration
statement.

                            /s/ Fisk & Robinson, P.C.


Dallas, Texas
August 23, 2000
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40147

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KATHY TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-674

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kathy Torres

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render 21

U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face, and by United States

v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005),

petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). which held

that a challenge to the district court’s order requiring the
No. 06-40147

-2-

defendant to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a

condition of supervised release is not ripe for review on direct

appeal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED. 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James Briscoe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Star Gold Corp., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Liberty Star Gold Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 1, 2006

 

 /s/ James Briscoe

James Briscoe

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)