alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Growth Hotel
Investors 1997 First Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000769129
<NAME> GROWTH HOTEL INVESTORS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,941)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,957
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.00<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
|   |   |                                                                         |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/      Mark A. Klein                                                       |   |
|   |   | Print      Name: Mark A. Klein                                               |   |
|   |   | Title:  Chief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|   |   | Date:  May      17, 2010                                           |   |

----

| * | This      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act      or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.  This      certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by      reference into any suchfiling. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Appellant, v. Aggie STROTHER et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 19, 1973.

Carl T. Miller, Dept, of Highways, Frankfort, Robert Lee Hall, Dept, of Highways, Covington, for appellant.

Thomas D. Theobald, Grayson, for ap-pellees.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner CULLEN,

Affirming.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,746
<SECURITIES>                                   294,772
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,104,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               324,323
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,735,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          392,268
<BONDS>                                     11,104,810
<COMMON>                                       184,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,735,651
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,906
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                       840
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Joseph P. Valentino, Respondent, v *831State Liquor Authority et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley L. Sklar, J.), entered December 9, 1988, which granted the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78, annulled the determination of respondent dated July 11, 1988, and remanded the matter to respondent for imposition of a new penalty in accordance with the court’s decision dated November 4, 1988, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Respondent had imposed a penalty of a 20-day (5 remitted) license suspension plus a $1,000 bond forfeiture in connection with two charges stemming out of possession of a Joker Poker machine, after petitioner had pleaded "no contest” to the first and a hearing was held on the second. The IAS court found that petitioner had been impermissibly penalized twice, that no explanation was given for failure to grant a good-record deferment, and that the dual penalty was excessive.

Contrary to respondent’s contentions, the court properly found the penalty to be arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). There was no showing of a separate and distinct violation, as petitioner had conceded to possession and maintenance of the machine in charge No. 1 *(see, Matter of Plato’s Cave Corp. v State Liq. Auth.,*68 NY2d 791). Respondent had also failed to set forth reasons why a good-faith deferral was not granted as in similar proceedings *(Matter of Field Delivery Serv. [Roberts],*66 NY2d 516). Finally, the imposition of both a license suspension and a bond forfeiture has been held to be excessive under similar circumstances *(Matter of MNDN Rest, v Gazzara,*128 AD2d 781, *lv denied*70 NY2d 603; *Matter of Popper’s Delicacies v State Liq. Auth.,*98 AD2d 601, *lv denied*61 NY2d 606).

The order of this court entered herein on March 27, 1990 [159 AD2d 420] is recalled and vacated. Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Asch and Rubin, JJ.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Urban von Euler, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 24Holdings Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  August 22, 2005


By: /s/ Urban von Euler
    -------------------------------
    Name:    Urban von Euler
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BLUEGATE CORPORATION PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C.
      63.





I,
      Manfred Sternberg, the Chief Executive Officer of Bluegate Corporation, hereby
      certify that Bluegate Corporation 's periodic report on Form 10-QSB, for the
      period ending June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information
      contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Bluegate
      Corporation.








Date:
                August 1, 2006
            /s/
            Manfred
                SternbergManfred
                SternbergChief
                Executive Officer
<PAGE>                                                           Exhibit 32.1

  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002



  I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President and Chief Executive Officer of CVD
  Equipment Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
  my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
  September 30, 2007 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the "Form 10-QSB") fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.


  Dated: November 14, 2007         /s/   Leonard A. Rosenbaum
                                      Leonard A. Rosenbaum
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)




                                 22
**Exhibit 31.2**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONI, Duane L. Sinn, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2006 of Rurban Financial Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  August 11, 2006 /s/ Duane L. Sinn   Duane L. Sinn   Executive Vice President &Chief Financial Officer
389 A.2d 166

#### Commonwealth v. Freedman, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1976.

Martin J. King, Public Defender, for appellant;

Kenneth G. Biehn, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1549

CARL E. MCADOO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Department of Veterans Affairs) in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; DR. ERNEST T. AHL, JR., in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; DR. SONNY W. TUCKER, JR., in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; SANDY F. PIERCE, Physician Assistant, in Official and Per sonal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; RUTHERFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; JOHN CARROLL, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; VIC MARTIN, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; ANN PADGETT, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; JOYCE ANN NASH, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
- 00239

- MOC

- DLH )

Submitted : August 24, 2017 Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Carl E. McAdoo, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; John E. Rogers, II, WARD LAW FIRM, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Carl E. McAdoo appeals from the district court’s orders gran ting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint alleging various civil rights violations related to the
death and estate of his father. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the d istrict court. McAdoo v. United
States , No. 1:14

- cv
- 00239

- MOC

- DLH (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2015; Apr. 4, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CRESCENT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.

I,  Mike McDonald, the Chief Financial Officer of Crescent Communications, Inc.,
hereby  certify  that  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10-QSB,  for  the  period  ending  March  31,  2004,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and  that  information  contained  in  the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents,  in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations  of  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.



Date May 17, 2004                      /s/Mike McDonald
                                       ----------------
                                       Mike McDonald
                                       Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Mark J. Hirschhorn, Chief Financial Officer of Datatec Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended January 31, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  FEB-22-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     FEB-24-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAY-25-1997
<CASH>                               5,636,725
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                       21,966,214
<ALLOWANCES>                         1,412,000
<INVENTORY>                         43,764,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    74,987,571
<PP&E>                              41,524,237
<DEPRECIATION>                      24,773,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     110,148,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               32,739,123
<BONDS>                             77,651,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                2,337,149
<PREFERRED>                          1,263,741
<COMMON>                               263,485
<OTHER-SE>                          (9,083,634)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       110,148,296
<SALES>                             33,036,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    33,036,062
<CGS>                               25,263,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       25,263,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     7,841,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       372,842
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2,701,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (2,978,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                            63,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (3,041,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (3,198,807)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
#### R. D. COOPER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant, v. T. L. RILEY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 19, 1973.

Robert Spragens, Jr., Robert M. Spra-gens, Lebanon, for appellant.

Barry Bertram, Faulkner & Bertram, Campbellsville, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Special Commissioner JAMES PARK, Jr.,

Affirming.*