alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 LORRIE M. HINZO,

3 Petitioner-Appellee,

4 v. No. 34,352

5 JASON P. HINZO,

6 Respondent-Appellant,

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex. rel 

8 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT,

9 Intervenor.

10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY

11 Mary W. Rosner, District Judge

12 Advanced Legal Resolutions, LLC

13 Sarah Van Cott

14 Las Cruces, NM

15 for Appellee

16 Jason P. Hinzo

17 Sioux Fall, SD

18 Pro Se 

19 Hector B. Balderas, Attorney General

20 Lila Bird, Special Assistan Attorney General
1 Santa Fe, NM 

2 for Intervenor

3 MEMORANDUM OPINION

4 VIGIL, Chief Judge.

5 {1} Respondent appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to modify child

6 support. This Court’s second notice of proposed summary disposition proposed to

7 affirm various findings of the district court, but to reverse the judgment below because

8 it awarded support for periods during which Respondent could not be characterized

9 as a noncustodial parent for purposes of NMSA 1978, Section 27-2-28(A) (2009).

10 [2CN 4] That notice proposed to remand this case to the district court for entry of a

11 support order that is consistent with the requirements of Section 27-2-28. [Id.] The

12 State has filed no response. Respondent, however, has filed a document in which he

13 does not oppose the proposed summary disposition. We, therefore, reverse the

14 judgment entered below and remand to the district court for the entry of an appropriate

15 order of support.

16 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 ______________________________

18 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
2

1 WE CONCUR:

2 ___________________________________

3 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

4 ___________________________________

5 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
EXHIBIT 99.1UHF INCORPORATEDCERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

CERTIFICATION

As required by 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, the undersigned certify that this Report on Form10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in this Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the registrant.

 

|                 |   |      |
|----------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date: March 28, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ RONALD C. SCHMEISER |
|                 |   |      |  |
|                 |   |      | **Ronald C. Schmeiser****President** |

-13-
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the inclusion inthis Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated December 28, 2023, relating to the financialstatement of VanEck Bitcoin Trust, as of December 21, 2023, and to the references to our firm under the heading “Experts”in such Registration Statement.

 

/s/ Cohen  & Company, Ltd.

Hunt Valley, Maryland

December 28, 2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1216, -1254

AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

THE CRYSTAL IMPORT CORPORATION and

DATAMARS SA,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DATAMARS, INC.,

Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

in case no. 2:04-CV-183, Judge T. John Ward.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Datamars SA moves to reform the official caption.*

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

It is this court's usual practice to not delete parties from the caption

because they were dismissed by the district court, unless the dismissal was on consent

or due to settlement. See also Fed. R. App. P. 12(a) (the clerk must docket the appeal

under the title of the district court action). Thus, the court need not delete Datamars,

Inc. from the caption. Because it appears, based on the submission, that Datamars,

Inc. will not be participating in the appeal, the court deletes the "appellee" designation

related to Datamars, Inc. from the caption.
The motion is granted to the extent that the revised official caption is reflected

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbalv 

above.

MAY 15 2009

Date

cc:	John W. Thornburgh, Esq.

Mark A. Hannemann, Esq.

s8

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ustfildlit %Ras Pon L CIRCUIT

MAY 1 5 2009

JAN HUNoni.t

CLERK

2009-1216, -1254	- 2 -
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE DIS TRICT OF COLUM BIA

F elix Castro, P laintif f, v. Civil Action No. 11-2197 (JD B) Bureau of

Alcohol, Tob acco, F irear m s, and Expl osives, Defendan t.

MEMORAN DUM OP INION I n this action broug ht pro se under the Fr eedom of Information Ac t (“F OI A”) , 5 U.S.C. § 552, plaintiff soug ht rec ords from the B urea u of Alcohol, Toba cco, F irea rms, and Explosi ves perta ining to him and DNAanaly sis of a we apon. SeeDef .’s Statement of Mate rial F acts As to Which There is No G enuine Dispute [Dkt. # 10] ¶ 1. On Febr uary 10, 2012, defe ndant moved for summary

judgme nt under F eder al Rule of Civil P roce dure 56 ba sed on its full relea se to plaintiff of “ the only

document it located tha

t was re sponsive to Plainti ff’ s FOI A re quest.” Id
. ¶ 11. By

Orde r of F ebrua

ry 21, 2012, plaintiff was dire cted to re spond by Marc h 27, 2012, to defe ndant’s motion or risk entry of judg ment for de fenda

nt. Plainti ff ha s not responded to the motion and, thus, has not disput ed def endant’ s fac t establishing its compliance with the FOIA by disclosing a ll responsive re cords. He nce, the Court will gra nt defe ndant’s motion for summaryjudgme nt and enter judgme nt acc ording ly
. A sepa rate Orde r ac companies this Memora ndum 1 Opinion. s/ J OHN D. B ATES DATE: May

2, 2012 United States District J udg e

See I n re Miller , No. 03-7146, 2004 WL963819 (D.C. Cir. May 4, 2004) (In manag ing 1 its docket under the circ umstances pr esente d, “the c ourt may choose to . . . re solve the motion for summary judgme nt on the merits without an opposition . . . or [ ] t reat summary judgme nt as conce ded.”)
2
[No. 34818.

Department Two.

March 26, 1959.]

#### Clara N. Erickson, *Respondent,*v. A. M. Erickson, *Appellant.*
      *1*

*Wilmot W. Garvin,*for appellant.

*J. Harold Anderson,*for respondent.

Reported in 337 P. (2d) 297.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the disposition of property in a divorce action.

The parties entered into a property agreement on February 8, 1955, which fixed the status of all property they then owned, or thereafter acquired, as community property. This agreement could not entitle the husband, as he contends here, to half of the community property in the event of a' divorce.

The trial court in the divorce action had all of the property of the parties before it and was empowered to make

> “ . . . such disposition of the property of the parties, either community or separate, as shall appear just and equitable, having regard to the respective merits of the parties, to the condition in which they will be left by such divorce ... to the party through whom the property was acquired, ...” RCW 26.08.110.

The division made by the trial court in the decree entered May 7, 1958, and here appealed from, appears to us “just and equitable” and is affirmed.

The respondent wife is awarded an attorney’s fee of two hundred fifty dollars for services on the appeal in addition to statutory costs. RCW 26.08.090.

This decision shall go into effect immediately, and the remittitur will go down forthwith. Supreme Court Rule 15, RCW Vol. 0.
Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm -
 KPMG, a Bermuda
Partnership
 
 The
      Board of Directors
 Platinum
      Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-104257 and 333-133521) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-113823) on Form S-3 of
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries (“Platinum”) of our
reports dated February 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet
of Platinum as of December 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2009, and the 2009 information on the related
financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Platinum.
 
 Our
report refers to a change in the manner in which the Company accounts for
other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities in 2009.
   /s/
      KPMG
 Hamilton,
      Bermuda
 February
      24, 2010
Exhibit 32.02

I, Steven B. Graham, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sbarro, Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  Quarterly  Report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Quarterly Report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this Quarterly  Report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.

Date:  August 25, 2003

/s/ STEVEN B. GRAHAM
------------------------------
Steven B. Graham,
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SBARRO,  INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SBARRO,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



                                    Page 48
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 for Hallwood Energy Partners,  L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768172
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         10,301
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,274
<PP&E>                                         659,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                 556,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,676
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     71,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,453
<SALES>                                        32,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               32,825
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.04)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before November 14, 2008 to be assured of consideration.

## United States Mint

*OMB Number:*                     1525-0013.                

*Type of Review:*                     Revision.                

*Title:*                     Application for Commercial Product License and Application for Intellectual Property Use.                

*Forms:*                     3044, 3045.                

*Description:*                     The application forms allow individuals and business entities to apply for Non-product License or Commercial Product License to use United States Mint intellectual property and trademark and copyright materials for products.                

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profit institutions.                

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     131 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Yvonne Pollard (202) 354-6784, United States Mint, 799 9th Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20220.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7316, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                

Robert Dahl,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-24531 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
EXHIBIT 12
 PRIMUS GUARANTY, LTD
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DISTRIBUTIONS OF SUBSIDIARY
(In thousands, except ratios)
 Years Ended December 31,2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Earnings (loss):Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes (a)
    
    $
    246,872
    
    
    $
    1,467,303
    
    
    $
    (1,699,903
    )
    
    $
    (558,774
    )
    
    $
    101,874Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    10,193
    
    
    
    12,533
    
    
    
    23,674
    
    
    
    28,297
    
    
    
    16,532Subtract:Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    (3,162
    )
    
    
    (3,417
    )
    
    
    (6,642
    )
    
    
    (7,568
    )
    
    
    (5,683
    )Adjusted earnings (loss)
    
    $
    253,903
    
    
    $
    1,476,419
    
    
    $
    (1,682,871
    )
    
    $
    (538,045
    )
    
    $
    112,723Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    7,031
    
    
    
    9,116
    
    
    
    17,032
    
    
    
    20,729
    
    
    
    10,849Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    3,162
    
    
    
    3,417
    
    
    
    6,642
    
    
    
    7,568
    
    
    
    5,683Total fixed charges and preferred distributions
    
    $
    10,193
    
    
    $
    12,533
    
    
    $
    23,674
    
    
    $
    28,297
    
    
    $
    16,532Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    24.91
    
    
    
    117.80
    
    
    
    (b
    )
    
    
    (b
    )
    
    
    6.82
 (a)
    
    Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes does not include income (loss) from
discontinued operations, distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary or net loss
attributable to non-parent interests in CLOs.(b)
    
    Due to the losses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the ratio
coverage was less than 1:1. Additional earnings of approximately $1.7 billion and $566.3
million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, would have been needed
to achieve the coverage ratio of 1:1.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Urban von Euler,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Urban von Euler
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Urban von Euler
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 18, 2004
**EXHIBIT 33.1**

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA**

**PURSUANT TO ITEM 1122 OF REGULATION AB**

**FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA**

Date: March 28, 2018 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized representative of First National Bank of Omaha (the “Servicer”), hereby certifies as follows: 

(1)    The Servicer is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in 17 C.F.R. §229.1122(d) (“Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB”), except for servicing criteria specified in (1)(iii); (2)(iii) and (vi); 3(iii) and (iv); and 4(x) of Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, which the Servicer has determined are inapplicable to theactivities it performs with respect to the credit card asset backed securities transactions issued by First National Master Note Trust (the “Platform”) being serviced (such applicable criteria, after giving effect to the exceptionsidentified above, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 relating to the servicing of the Platform; 

(2)    The Servicer used the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the ApplicableServicing Criteria; 

(3)    The Servicer is in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria relating to thePlatform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 in all material respects; and 

(4)    Deloitte &Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,2017. 

 

[Signature page to Report on Assessment of Compliance 

of First National Bank of Omaha]
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael I. Gearhardt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of MTC Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.



|                        
|------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2008    
|                        
|/s/ Michael I. Gearhardt
|Michael I. Gearhardt    
|Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

p0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147611(33)

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURA NCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 147611

COA: 311811

Gratiot CC: 11

- 011662

- CK

LAURIE BOWERS, CARL BOWERS,

JULIE BOWERS and NICHOLAS BOWERS,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

27, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE
18, UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report of Form
10-K for the year ended December 25, 2004 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                                               
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: February 28, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David B. Snow, Jr.                        
|                        |  | Name:  |  | David B. Snow, Jr.                            
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-136063, 333-141413 and 333-149721 on Form S-8 of our reports dated
March 11, 2009, relating (1) to the consolidated financial statements of Techwell Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the consolidated
financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1, 2007), and (2) the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Techwell Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Jose, California

March 11,
2009

---