alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The American National Red Cross et al. *v.*McCoy, Trustee.

(No. 25504

Decided October 16, 1935.)

*Mr. Burch D. Huggins,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. N. P. Clyburn,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
#### Alex LIVING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44274.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1971.

Thomas D. Prichard, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., Phyllis Bell and Jack Bodiford, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The appeal is from an order revoking probation.

On November 3, 1969, appellant entered a plea of guilty before the court to the offense of robbery by assault. Punishment was assessed at 10 years. Imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation, one of the terms and conditions being that he commit no offense against the laws of this state.

On February 12, 1970, a motion was filed to revoke probation alleging that appellant violated such terms.

On July 10, 1970, a hearing was held on the motion to revoke probation and the court found that the appellant violated his probation, in that on or about January 18, 1970, he committed the offense of robbery by assault on Harry Matthia.1

We conclude that no abuse of discretion was shown by the trial court in revoking appellant’s probation.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. See Living v. State, 473 S.W.2d 214.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7361

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FREDERICK KEITH SINGLETON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-179-A)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Keith Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford

Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Singleton appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule

41(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s finding that Singleton did not lawfully possess

the $8,400 and the finding that Dunbar Armored, Inc. was entitled

to the money. See United States v. Singleton, No. CR-95-179-A

(E.D. Va. Sept. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1880 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit dog fighting ventures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2007 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit dog fighting 

ventures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITIONS ON DOG FIGHTING VENTURES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 26 of the Animal Welfare 

5 Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘any person to knowingly 

8 sponsor’’ and inserting ‘‘any person— 

9 ‘‘(A) to knowingly sponsor’’; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 1880 IS

1 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

2 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(B) to knowingly sponsor or exhibit an 

5 animal in, or knowingly attend, a dog fighting 

6 venture.’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (b)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘any person to knowingly 

9 sell’’ and inserting ‘‘any person— 

10 ‘‘(A) to knowingly sell’’; and 

11 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

12 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) to knowingly sell, buy, possess, train, 

15 transport, deliver, or receive for purposes of 

16 transportation, any dog or other animal for the 

17 purposes of having the dog or other animal, or 

18 offspring of the dog or other animal, participate 

19 in a dog fighting venture.’’; and 

20 (3) in subsection (g)— 

21 (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

22 the end; 

23 (B) by redesignating paragraph (6) as 

24 paragraph (7); and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 1880 IS

1 (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(6) the term ‘dog fighting venture’— 

4 ‘‘(A) means any event that— 

5 ‘‘(i) involves a fight between at least 

6 2 animals; 

7 ‘‘(ii) includes at least 1 dog; and 

8 ‘‘(iii) is conducted for purposes of 

9 sport, wagering, or entertainment; and 

10 ‘‘(B) does not include any activity the pri11 mary purpose of which involves the use of 1 or 

12 more animals to hunt another animal; and’’. 

13 (b) ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING PROHIBI14 TIONS.—Section 49 of title 18, United States Code, is 

15 amended by inserting ‘‘(or in the case of a dog fighting 

16 venture (as defined in section 26(g) of that Act) not more 

17 than 5 years)’’ before ‘‘, or both’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
"Date","Total","Federal","Nonfederal Total","Nonfederal Households","Nonfederal Business","Nonfederal State and local govts"
"1997",5.3,5.8,9.0,4.3,0.6,
"1998",6.8,7.8,12.3,6.3,-1.4,
"1999",6.4,8.3,10.6,3.4,-1.9,
"2000",4.9,9.1,9.1,1.3,-8.0,
"2001",6.4,9.6,5.9,8.8,-0.2,
"","","","","","",""
"2002",7.3,10.8,2.5,11.0,7.6,
"2003",8.1,11.5,2.6,8.3,10.9,
"2004",8.9,11.4,5.8,7.4,9.0,
"2005",9.0,10.5,7.7,10.2,7.0,
"2006",8.7,10.0,9.6,8.2,3.9,
"","","","","","",""
"2006Q1",9.9,11.0,10.3,5.6,8.0,
"2006Q2",8.0,10.6,8.5,7.3,1.0,
"2006Q3",7.2,8.7,6.9,7.7,3.6,
"2006Q4",8.4,8.0,11.4,11.4,2.8,
"","","","","","",""
"2007Q1",7.9,7.1,8.9,11.1,6.7,
"2007Q2",7.1,7.1,10.6,11.9,-1.4,
Exhibit 13.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report of MegaWest Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George T Stapleton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 November 15, 2010
 
 /s/ George T Stapleton*

George T Stapleton

Chairman of the Board of Directors and

Chief Executive Officer
  * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 5.1

                [LETTERHEAD OF WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI]

                            September 20, 2000

Via Overnight Mail

ClearCommerce Corporation
11500 Metric Boulevard, Suite 300
Austin, Texas 78758

     Re: Registration Statement on Form S-1.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-31878) filed by ClearCommerce Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on
March 7, 2000 (as such registration statement may be amended or supplemented,
the "Registration Statement"), in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), of up to 4,025,000 shares of
your common stock (the "Shares"). The Shares, which include up to 525,000
shares of common stock issuable pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to
the underwriters, are to be sold to the underwriters as described in such
Registration Statement for the sale to the public. As your counsel in
connection with this transaction, we have examined the proceedings proposed to
be taken by you in connection with the issuance and sale of the Shares.

   It is our opinion that, assuming the Shares are issued at the price
established by the pricing committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
and assuming that the Shares are issued and sold in the manner referred to in
the Registration Statement and approved by the pricing committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company, the Shares will be legally and validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable.

   We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the
Registration Statement, including the prospectus constituting a part thereof,
and any amendment thereto.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
                                          Professional Corporation

                                          /s/ WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report of Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David F. Brussard, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



/s/ DAVID F. BRUSSARD David F. Brussard President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)March 13, 2009


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         768408
<NAME>                        Cyanotech Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        346
<SECURITIES>                                 1500
<RECEIVABLES>                                1696
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                  2011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6137
<PP&E>                                      23855
<DEPRECIATION>                               4163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2356         
<BONDS>                                       218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     1
<COMMON>                                       64
<OTHER-SE>                                  23841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26090
<SALES>                                      3827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3827    
<CGS>                                        2070 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                71
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            71
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   71
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

| | U.S. Geothermal Inc. (incorporated in the State of Idaho)               
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Gerlach Geothermal LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)             
| | U.S. Geothermal Services, LLC (organized in the State of
      Delaware)
| | USG Nevada LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)                     
| | USG Gerlach LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)                    
| | USG Oregon LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)                     
| | Oregon USG Holdings, LLC (organized in the State of
      Delaware)     
| | U.S. Geothermal Guatemala, S.A. (organized in Guatemala)                
| | Raft River Energy I LLC (organized in the State of
      Delaware)      

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1537345
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     112314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1666811
<PP&E>                                         1301953
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6670256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           622506
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       4606804
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5724549
<SALES>                                        1355108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1355380
<CGS>                                           461926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   461926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                757567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 135887
<INCOME-TAX>                                     41000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     94887
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
May 15, 2013 Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, N.E.Washington, D.C. 20549 Commissioners: We have read the statements made byCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP,(copy attached), which we understand will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Item 16.F of Form 20-F, as part of the Form 20-F ofCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP,dated May 15, 2013.   We agree with such statements concerning our Firm in such Form 20-F. Very truly yours,  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes


---
#### CAMPBELL v. CLARK.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

July 16, 1954.

W. Marion Walton, A. J. Musselman, Jr., Pompana Beach, and Edgar G. Hamilton, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Stephen G. O’Connell, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This is an ejectment suit brought by Odelle Pitts Clark, as administratrix of the estate of Walter R. Clark, deceased, against Hobb Campbell. The defendant filed a plea of possession coupled with a parol gift. At the conclusion of the defendant’s case, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict, ruling on which was reserved.

There was no dispute about the fact that the plaintiff had record title and was not required to prove such title. After the plaintiff had introduced her evidence, the case was submitted to the jury and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant.

■Thereafter the plaintiff filed a motion for new trial and for a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The Court granted . this motion and thereafter . final judgment was entered for the plaintiff. This appeal is from that final judgment.

It may be that the defendant, appellant here, is entitled to some relief under F.S. Section 70.06, F.S.A.

We find no reversible error and the judgment be and the same is hereby affirmed, but without prejudice to the right of the defendant-appellant ' to take such proceedings as he may be advised under F.S. Section 70.06, F.S.A.

ROBERTS, C. J., TERRELL, J., and! MURPHREE, Associate Justice, concur..
EXHIBIT 4.12



CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

TAYC CAPITAL TRUST II



THIS Certificate of Trust of TAYC Capital Trust II (the Trust) is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the
Trust by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.C. § 3801 et seq.) (the Act).



1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is TAYC Capital Trust II.



2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, 1100 North Market Street, Rodney Square North, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.



3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.



WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as TrusteeBy:

/s/    CHRISTOPHER J.
SLAYBAUGHName:

Christopher J. SlaybaughTitle:

Financial Services Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Natco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Dated: July 16, 2007

                                                      /s/ Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm
                                               Chief Executive Officer and CFO

                                                      /s/ Stephen K. Sleigh
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Stephen K. Sleigh
                                                      Director and Controller
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1903 

To extend the temporary protected status designation of Liberia under section 

244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act so that Liberians can continue to be eligible for such status through September 30, 2008. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2007 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary protected status designation of 

Liberia under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act so that Liberians can continue to be eligible 

for such status through September 30, 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DESIGNATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the designation of Liberia under section 

6 244(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

7 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(1)) is extended through September 30, 

8 2008. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 1903 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall be applied 

2 so that an alien who is a national of Liberia (or in the 

3 case of an alien having no nationality, is a person who 

4 last habitually resided in Liberia) and is otherwise eligible 

5 under section 244(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act is eligible for temporary protected status and work 

7 authorization, in accordance with subsections (a), (e) and 

8 (f) of section 244 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1254a), if the 

9 alien— 

10 (1) was granted such status under the designa11 tion of Liberia by the Secretary of Homeland Secu12 rity that is effective until October 1, 2007 (71 Fed. 

13 Reg. 55000); 

14 (2) applied for such status under such designa15 tion, and such application is still pending; or 

16 (3) is eligible for late initial registration under 

17 section 244(c) of such Act and the regulations im18 plementing such section. 

19 (c) REQUIREMENTS.—Not later than 60 days after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

21 Homeland Security shall publish in the Federal Register 

22 procedures for aliens to register for temporary protected 

23 status under the extension made by this Act, and to apply 

24 for any applicable work authorization or extension of work 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 1903 IS

1 authorization. Such registration period shall continue for 

2 not fewer than 60 days. 

3 (d) EXTENSION OF CURRENT WORK AUTHORIZA4 TIONS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

5 work authorization provided under section 244 of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act pursuant to the designation 

7 of Liberia that is effective until October 1, 2007, shall 

8 not expire before April 1, 2008. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS