alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated September 15, 2000, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements of ProsoftTraining.com and subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2000
which is incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement. We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of the
aforementioned report.


                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Grant Thornton LLP


Dallas, Texas
January 10, 2001
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ALCON PHARMACEUTICAL S LTD. ( substituted for A lcon , I nc .) AND ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.
, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________

2010

- 1097

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 06

- CV

- 0234, Ju dge Sue L. Robinson.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R

The parties jointly move to dismiss the present a ppeal

. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. Case: 10-1097 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 02/25/2014ALCON PHARMACEUTICAL S v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 25, 2014 Case: 10-1097 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 02/25/2014
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2106]



[[Page 5314]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-35-000]


T.E.S. Filer City Station Limited Partnership; Notice of Filing

January 26, 2010.
    Take notice that on January 20, 2010, T.E.S. City Station Limited 
Partnership, pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 
U.S.C. 824d, 31 U.S.C. 9701, 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352, and Part 35 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 35, 
filed a revenue requirement pursuant to which they will provide 
Reactive Power and Voltage Control from Generation Sources under 
Schedule 2 of the Open Access Transmission Tariff of the Midwest 
Independent System Transmission Operator, Inc.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dd9b988f9e92b3b1b4b3b88ea8adadb2afa99dbbb8afbef3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 10, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2106 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### GENTRY v. CITY OF MIAMI.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
14

‐ 1070

Akran v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

R ULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT

. C ITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER

J ANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY F EDERAL R ULE OF A PPELLATE P ROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT ’ S

L OCAL R ULE 32.1.1. W HEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT

, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER

THE F EDERAL A PPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE ( WITH THE NOTATION “ SUMMARY ORDER ”). A PARTY CITING A

SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second

Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley

Square, in the City of New York, on the 16 th day of October

, two thousand

fourteen.

PRESENT: CHESTER J. STRAUB,

RICHARD C. WESLEY,

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON,

Circuit Judges

.

________________ _______________ _____________

GODSON ODUBIYI AKRAN,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant,

‐ v. ‐ No. 14

‐ 1070

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

‐ Appellee.

________________ _______________ _____________2 FOR APPELLANT: JAVIER N. MALDONADO, Law Office of Javier N.

Maldonado, P.C., San Antonio, TX.

FOR APPELLEE: ELLIOT M. SCHACHNER, Varuni Nelson, Margaret M.

Kolbe, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Loretta E.

Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of

New York, Brooklyn, NY.

________________ _______________ _____________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

New York (Eric N. Vitaliano, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED

.

Appellant Godson Akran brought this suit pursuant to the Federal Tort

Claims Act. Akran alleged that the United States falsely imprisoned him by

arresting and detaining him during the pendency of removal proceedings.

Finding that the detention was legally privileged, the district court granted the

United States’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. This appeal

followed.

We AFFIRM on the ground that Akran’s Complaint fails to adequately

allege a cause of action. Akran’s contention that immigration officials knew or

should have known that he was a United States citizen is conclusory and3 implausible. We have considered Akran’s remaining arguments and find them

to be without merit.

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
EXHIBIT 4.1

                            [iExalt INC. LETTERHEAD]

March 15, 2000

Consulting & Strategy International, Inc.
5433 Westheimer, Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77056

       Re: Consulting Services for iExalt, Inc.

Dear Sirs:

      The consulting services rendered in conjunction with iExalt's acquisition
of First Choice Marketing, were greatly appreciated by the Company. In light of
the services you rendered in that regard, which lie outside of the current
consulting contract with your company, iExalt has agreed to pay to Consulting &
Strategy International, Inc. a consulting fee of 190,890 shares of iExalt common
stock that the Company hereby agrees to register under an S-8 filing with the
SEC.

      Pursuant to our Agreement, the shares shall be issued equally in the names
of the principals of Consulting & Strategy International, Franklin C. Fisher,
Jr. and Steve Tebo.

      Please signify your agreement to this fee structure by signing below and
faxing and mailing to iExalt a signed original of this Agreement. Thanks again
for your help with this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ JONATHAN C. GILCHRIST
    Jonathan C. Gilchrist

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

CONSULTING & STRATEGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By /s/ F.C. FISHER, JR.
   --------------------------------------
   F.C. FISHER, JR.
   Chief Executive Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 13 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00370- CV

JAMES ROY STEAGALL, Appellant

V. KATHERINE SCMIDT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-18988

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed April 24, 2019. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On June 28, 2019, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).2

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           30237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      916
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 31332
<PP&E>                                           15777
<DEPRECIATION>                                   10617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   36493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       36171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     36493
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12496
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4807
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4807
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.12
        

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1910 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts 

derived from Federal grants and State matching funds in connection 

with revolving funds established in accordance with the Federal Water 

Pollution Control Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act will not be 

treated as proceeds or replacement proceeds for purposes of section 

148 of such Code. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Mr. REED (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. KERRY, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that amounts derived from Federal grants and State 

matching funds in connection with revolving funds established in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution 

Control Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act will not 

be treated as proceeds or replacement proceeds for purposes of section 148 of such Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1910 IS

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF FEDERAL GRANTS AND STATE 

2 MATCHING FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH RE3 VOLVING FUNDS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORD4 ANCE WITH FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION 

5 CONTROL ACT AND SAFE DRINKING WATER 

6 ACT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 148(a) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining arbitrage bond) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For 

10 purposes of determining whether a bond is an ‘arbitrage 

11 bond’ under this section, any amount derived from an in12 vestment of any Federal grant or related State match 

13 made in connection with any revolving fund established 

14 in accordance with title VI of the Federal Water Pollution 

15 Control Act or section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water 

16 Act (or subsequent reauthorizations of such Acts) shall 

17 not be taken into account.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to obligations issued or out20 standing after the date of the enactment of this Act, but 

21 only with respect to amounts earned on outstanding obli22 gations after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

**[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

OR

**[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

Commission File Number 0-11655

**NTS-PROPERTIES IV, LTD.***(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)*

|                                        |                                            |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                        | 10172 Linn Station Road                    |
| 61-1026356                             | Louisville, Kentucky 40223                 |
| *(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)* | *(Address of principal executive offices)* |

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(502) 426-4800

Kentucky(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Title of each Class: None

Name of each exchange on which registered: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

|                               |  |      |
|-------------------------------|--|------|
| Limited partnership interests |  | None |
|                               |  |      |

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1309

MONA MOHAMMED ABDU,

Petitioner,

versus

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-899-263)

Submitted: December 10, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Israel W. Gobena, GOBENA & DE WALT, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley

R. Goad, Senior Litigation Counsel, Dalin R. Holyoak, OFFICE OF

IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mona Mohammed Abdu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying as untimely and numerically barred her

motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the

record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See Barry v.

Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006). Further, we lack

jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to invoke its sua sponte

authority to reopen proceedings. See Zhao Quon Chen v. Gonzales,

492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART

AND DISMISSED IN PART
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph F. Fisher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.

September 20, 2005                      /s/  JOSEPH F. FISHER
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        By: Joseph F. Fisher
                                        Executive Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 188 

To revise the short title of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta 

Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. REID, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. 

BOXER, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To revise the short title of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa 

Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 Section 1 of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and 

5 Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization 

6 and Amendments Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–246) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘and Coretta Scott King’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘Coretta Scott King, and Ce ́sar E. Cha ́vez’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 188 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

2 Paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 4(a), and section 

3 13(a)(1), of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 

4 1973b(a), 1973k(a)(1)) are each amended by striking 

5 ‘‘and Coretta Scott King’’ and inserting ‘‘Coretta Scott 

6 King, and Ce ́sar E. Cha ́vez’’. 

7 SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION. 

8 Title I of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 

9 1973 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘SEC. 20. A reference in this title to the effective date 

12 of the amendments made by, or the date of the enactment 

13 of, the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott 

14 King, and Ce ́sar E. Cha ́vez Voting Rights Act Reauthor15 ization and Amendments Act of 2006 shall be considered 

16 to refer to, respectively, the effective date of the amend17 ments made by, or the date of the enactment of, the 

18 Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King 

19 Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act 

20 of 2006.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### Alfred J. Bohlinger, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Liquidator of The Preferred Accident Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Irving Rosenbaum et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 7, 1955.

*Herman L. Brutten*for diaries Rosenbaum, defendant.

*Robert Fishbein*for Otto G-itlin and another, defendants.

*Alfred C. Bennett*for plaintiff.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

The complaint sets forth causes of action in fraud, negligence (not founded on personal injury or death) and conspiracy. The answers are general denials. *236The plaintiff has served notices to examine certain defendants before trial ‘ ‘ upon the following matter: That the examination will be with respect to the material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings The respective defendants have moved to vacate such notices.

In view of the fact that, when rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice was adopted in 1952, the Appellate Divisions seemed to have concluded that *Bamberger*v. *Cooke*(181 App. Div. 805 [1st dept., 1918]) and *Fortgang*v. *Alpert*(256 App. Div. 949 [2d dept., 1939]); (cf. *Myers*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*277 App. Div. 745 [3d dept., 1951]) should be rendered obsolete in specified negligence cases only (see *Parsons*v. *Hadley Fashions,*N. Y. L. J., Aug. 9, 1955, p. 9, col. *2; Stevens*v. *Mahony,*N. Y. L. J., June 10, 1955, p. 8, col. 5; *D'Andrea*v. *Donovan,*N. Y. L. J., July 29, 1955, p. 6, col. 7; *Nutkowitz*v. *Brown,*N. Y. L. J., April 21, 1955, p. 11. col. 8; cf. *Malus*v. *Sperry Corp.,*282 App. Div. 939 [1st dept., 1953] affg. 133 N. Y. S. 2d 286), I have come to the conclusion that a blanket notice to examine an adversary before trial — to the effect, for example, that the party is to be “ examined with respect to the material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings ” — is inadequate in the instant type of case (but see *Industrial Bank of Commerce*v. *Rubin,*207 Misc. 567).

Accordingly, the motion to vacate is granted, without prejudice to proceeding for the examination upon the basis of prescribed specification of “the matters” that are to be the subject of the depositions (Civ. Prac. Act, § 290). Order-signed.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I,
        James A. Krantz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my
        knowledge and belief that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this
        Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings,
        Ltd.
 
 
 Date:
                  February 27, 2008
              /s/  James
                  A. KrantzBy:
                  James A. KrantzExecutive
                  Vice President and Chief Financial
                  Officer