alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                           APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,901
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                      10
<INVENTORY>                                    2,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,018
<PP&E>                                        23,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                (8,046)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,241
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          79
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,433
<SALES>                                        4,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,526
<CGS>                                          3,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (62)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (62)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (62)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW Document 36 Filed 02/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW Document 36 Filed 02/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW Document 36 Filed 02/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW Document 36 Filed 02/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW Document 36 Filed 02/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Raymond P. Moore

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-RM-KMT

BRUCE W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARK KELLAR, Individually and in his official capacity as the Health Service Administrator at 

FCI-Florence;

LISA MCDERMOTT, Individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Health Services 

Administrator at FCI-Florence;

PETER BLUDWORTH, Individually and in his official capacity as Associate Warden at FCIFlorence;

MIKE GOODIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Pharmacist at FCI-Florence;

DR. DAVID ALLRED, Individually and in his official capacity as Clinical Director of FCIFlorence;

DR. GEORGE SANTINI, Individually and in his official capacity as Staff Physician at FCIFlorence;

CARI RITTER, Individually and in her official capacity as Mid-Level Provider at FCI-Florence;

MRS. A. VINYARD, Individually and in her official capacity as Physician Assistant at FCIFlorence;

GILBERTA TRUJILLO, Individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of Medical at 

FCI-Florence;

MR. GRIFFIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Correctional Officer at FCI-Florence;

JOHN DOE, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Health Programs at North Central 

Region, Leavenworth, Kansas; and

DR. JAMES PELTON, Individually and in his official capacity as Region Medical Director at 

North Central Region, Leavenworth, Kansas,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT JAMES PELTON (ECF NO. 195)

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dr. 

James Pelton (“Motion”) (ECF No. 195). Upon consideration of the Motion, Defendants’ 

Case 1:11-cv-02721-RM-KMT Document 213 Filed 08/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

response stating they have no objection to the Motion, and being otherwise fully advised, it is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendant Dr. James Pelton are DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Dr. James Pelton’s name shall be removed from 

the caption in all future filings in this matter.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2013. 

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________

RAYMOND P. MOORE

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02721-RM-KMT Document 213 Filed 08/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.  20549



                                   FORM 8-K



                                CURRENT REPORT


                      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     May 10, 2000
                                                  ---------------------------

                            VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


     Delaware                     1-10578                   73-1182669
------------------          ---------------------     -----------------------
 (State or other               (Commission File          (IRS Employer
 jurisdiction of                    Number)            Identification No.)
 incorporation)


110 West Seventh Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma                      74119
----------------------------------------              -----------------------
 (Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code      (918) 592-0101
                                                   --------------------------


                                Not Applicable
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events.
         ------------

         A copy of the Registrant's press release dated May 10, 2000, is
         attached as an exhibit hereto and incorporated herein by reference.


Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.
         ---------------------------------

         (c)  Exhibits.

                  99  Press release dated May 10, 2000, issued by the
                  Registrant.



                                   SIGNATURES
                                   ----------

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INC.



Date:   May 10, 2000            By:  /s/  Michael F. Meimerstorf
                                   -------------------------------
                                   Michael F. Meimerstorf
                                   Vice President and Controller

                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit Index



Exhibit
Number                            Description
------         -----------------------------------------------------------

99             Press release dated May 10, 2000, issued by the Registrant.
#### Henry FRITZ, Sr., v. DICK BROS. BAKERY CO., et al.

No. 6448.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1937.

Ira Milton Jones, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.

Leon F. Foley, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellees.

Before EVANS, SPARKS, and MAJOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit:

*1004“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto by their respective solicitors, that the appeal herein of the Plaintiff-Appellant be dismissed, and that an order may be entered accordingly.

“Dated November 9, 1937.”

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and .decreed by this court that this appeal be docketed in this court. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed with costs, pursuant to the foregoing stipulation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     7
<LEGEND>   This  schedule contains summary financial
information extracted  from  the  consolidated financial
statements  of  MMI Companies,  Inc. and subsidiaries for
the six month period  ended June  30, 1999, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference  to such financial statements.

<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>            1,068,635
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>           0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>             0
<EQUITIES>                      54,004
<MORTGAGE>                      0
<REAL-ESTATE>                   0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                  1,163,576
<CASH>                          21,909
<RECOVER-REINSURE>              28,336
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>          37,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,966,890
<POLICY-LOSSES>                 1,142,633
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>             197,812
<POLICY-OTHER>                  0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>           0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                 118,922
<COMMON>                        1,915
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      391,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,966,890
<PREMIUMS>                      165,005
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>             36,391
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>              92
<OTHER-INCOME>                  31,287
<BENEFITS>                      129,020
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>     27,790
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>            58,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 12,088
<INCOME-TAX>                    844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             11,244
<DISCONTINUED>                  (3,643)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    7,601
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.39
<RESERVE-OPEN>                  0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>             0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>               0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>              0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                 0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>         0










</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Thomas P. Eldred, Petitioner, against George P. Monaghan, as Commissioner of Harness Racing, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

June 22, 1957.

*659
      *Ernest B. Morris*for petitioner.

*Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (Edward Siegfried*of counsel), for respondents.

Herbert D. Hamm, J.

TMs is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the Commissioner of Harness Racing and the State Harness Racing Commission to issue forthwith to the petitioner a license to participate as an owner in harness horse race meets.

On June 5, 1957, the petitioner received notice of refusal of license. On the same day he mailed to the respondents a demand for hearing pursuant to section 47 of the Pari-mutuel Revenue Law (L. 1940, ch. 254, as amd. by L. 1954, ch. 510).

Section 47 provides as pertinent: “ If the state harness racing commission shall refuse to grant a license applied for under this act * .* * the applicant * * * may demand, within ten days after notice of the said act of the commission, a hearing before the commission and the commission shall give prompt notice of a time and place for such hearing * * * The commission may, if occasion shall require, by order, refer to one or more of its officers, the duty of taking testimony in such matter, and to report thereon to the commission, but no determination shall be made therein except by the commission. Within thirty days after the conclusion of such hearing, the commission shall make a final order in writing, setting forth the reasons for the action taken by it and a copy thereof shall be served on such applicant or licensee, as the case may be. The action of the commission in refusing to grant a license or in revoking or suspending a license shall be reviewable in the supreme court in the manner provided by and subject to the provisions of article seventy-eight of the civil practice act.”

On June 10,1957, the petitioner received notice that a hearing would be held on June 13, 1957. On June 12, 1957, he obtained an order to show cause bringing on this proceeding and staying the hearing and all further proceedings pending the final determination of this application.

The petition is dismissed, the stay is vacated and the order to be submitted will provide that the commission give prompt notice of a time and place for hearing.

The proceeding is prematurely brought. The petitioner contends that he cannot have a fair hearing and that exhaustion of the administrative remedy requested by bim and granted by the commission as required by law would be inadequate. After hearing had the petitioner, if so advised, may raise the issue *660that the hearing was unfair or inadequate as well as other issues. The cases cited by the petitioner on futility of exhaustion of remedy relate to exhaustion of internal remedies in labor unions; they do not apply to a hearing mandated by law on the petitioner’s application.

This proceeding is in the nature of mandamus and Special Term may exercise reasonable discretion.

Submit order in accordance with the foregoing on two days' notice.
|**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                                           
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**                    

In connection with the Annual Report of The International White Tea
Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof or immediately
thereafter (the "Report"), I, Donald Hejmanowski, President and Chief Executive Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company

|/s/ DONALD HEJMANOWSKI                                
|------------------------------------------------------
|Donald Hejmanowski, President, Chief Executive Officer
|May 11, 2004                                          

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
to be filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|
|
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 5.1


                            GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY
                           A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
TELEPHONE: (972) 419-8300                                2200 ONE GALLERIA TOWER
FAX: (972) 419-8329         ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS    13355 NOEL ROAD, L.B. 48
                                                       DALLAS, TEXAS  75240-6657

                                 August 9, 2000

Inland Resources Inc.
410 17th Street
Suite 700
Denver, Colorado 80202

     Re:  Form S-8 Registration Statement relating to the registration of 87,500
          shares of common stock, $.001 par value, of Inland Resources Inc.
          pursuant to the Stock Option Agreement dated October 1, 1999 with Bill
          I. Pennington

Gentlemen:

     We are acting as counsel for Inland Resources Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, of a Registration Statement for the Company on Form S-8
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") (the "Registration
Statement"), covering an aggregate of 87,500 shares (the "Shares") of common
stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company which will
be issued pursuant to the Stock Option Agreement dated October 1, 1999 with Bill
I. Pennington.


     In that connection, we have examined the Form S-8 Registration Statement in
the form to be filed with the SEC.  We have also examined and are familiar with
the originals or authenticated copies of all corporate or other documents,
records and instruments that we have deemed necessary or appropriate to enable
us to render the opinion expressed below.

     We have assumed that all signatures on all documents presented to us are
genuine, that all documents submitted to us as originals are accurate and
complete, that all documents submitted to us as copies are true and correct
copies of the originals thereof, that all information submitted to us was
accurate and complete and that all persons executing and delivering originals or
copies of documents examined by us were competent to execute and deliver such
documents.  In addition, we have assumed that the Shares will not be issued for
consideration equal to less than the par value thereof and that the form of
consideration to be received by the Company for the Shares will be lawful
consideration under the Washington Business Corporation Act.

     Based on the foregoing and having due regard for the legal considerations
we deem relevant, we are of the opinion that the Shares, or any portion thereof,
when issued as described in the Registration Statement, will be validly issued
by the Company, fully paid and nonassessable.

     This opinion is limited in all respects to the laws of the United States of
America and the Washington Business Corporation Act.

     This opinion may be filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C.

                                    GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY, P.C.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

As
an accompaniment to the Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Archie M. Brown, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

This
certification is based on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faith effort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officer serving
the Company and its many constituencies.

This
certification merely accompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for any purpose
other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date:
March 12, 2009

|                                 |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | 
|Archie M. Brown, Jr. [Signature] |  | 

|                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | 
|President & Chief Executive Officer [Title] |  | 

64

---



QuickLinks
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T FEB RUARY 18, 2010 J OHN L EY ACTI NG CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 0 9 8 2 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 8

- 0 0 1 3 3

- C R

- O R L

- 3 1

- K R S

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s
J O S E R O B E R T O O R T I Z , a

. k

. a

. B o b b y ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( F e b r u a r y 1 8 , 2 0 1 0 )

B e f o r e C A R N E S , M A R C U S a n d H I L L , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

M i c h a e l D o n a l d s o n , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r J o s e R o b e r t o O r t i z , h a s f i l e d am o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l , s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

.

C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t

r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f

t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s

n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d

O r t i z ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a n d s e n t e n c e s a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,486,021
<SECURITIES>                                         333
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,085,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (168,662)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,752,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,981,691
<PP&E>                                         1,503,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                   693,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,741,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            671,060
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        2,634
<COMMON>                                          22,874
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,741,930
<SALES>                                          977,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,042,006
<CGS>                                            428,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,179,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (104,721)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (140,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (140,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (140,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>