alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                        ------------------------------


                                    State or Jurisdiction      Ownership
        Name                           of Incorporation        Percentage
        ----                        ---------------------      ----------

Vintage Gas, Inc.                   Oklahoma                       100
Vintage Marketing, Inc.             Oklahoma                       100
Vintage Pipeline, Inc.              Oklahoma                       100
Vintage Petroleum International,    Oklahoma                       100
 Inc.
Vintage Oil Argentina, Inc.         Cayman Islands                 100
Cadipsa S.A.                        Republic of Argentina           97
Vintage Petroleum Argentina, Inc.   Cayman Islands                 100
Vintage Petroleum Ecuador, Inc.     Cayman Islands                 100
Vintage Petroleum Boliviana, Ltd.   Bermuda                        100
VP Argentina, Inc.                  Cayman Islands                 100
Vintage Petroleum Yemen, Inc.       Cayman Islands                 100
Vintage Oil Ecuador, S.A.           France                         100
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CRESCENT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.

I,  Manfred  Sternberg,  the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Communications,
Inc.,  hereby  certify  that  Crescent Communications, Inc.'s periodic report on
Form  10-QSB,  for  the  period  ending  March 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and  that  information  contained  in  the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents,  in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations  of  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.



Date: May 17, 2004                     /s/  Manfred Sternberg
                                       ----------------------
                                       Manfred Sternberg
                                       Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12281 and #12282]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of WASHINGTON dated 08/17/2010. *Incident:*
                         Lynnview Apartment Complex Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         08/09/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         08/17/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/18/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/17/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Snohomish. *Contiguous Counties:*
                     Washington: Chelan, Island, King, Skagit. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:**Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere*
5.000*Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
2.500*Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere*
6.000*Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.625*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.000*For Economic Injury**Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12281 5 and for economic injury is 12282 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Washington. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: August 17, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-20964 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
                                                     WORTHINGTON FOODS, INC.
                                                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED                     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                              7/2/99             7/3/98             7/2/99             7/3/98
                                                              ------             ------             ------             ------
<S>                                                         <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
Basic:

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding .................................         12,379,979         11,723,816         12,376,352         11,683,762
                                                            ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========

Net income .........................................        $ 2,545,000        $ 2,870,000        $ 4,245,000        $ 5,027,000
                                                            ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========

Earnings per share .................................        $      0.21        $      0.25        $      0.34        $      0.43
                                                            ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========


Diluted:

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding ...............................         12,379,979         11,723,816         12,376,352         11,683,762

Net effect of dilutive stock options based
  on the treasury stock method using the
  average market price during the period ...........            134,538            364,725            128,211            341,217
                                                            -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------

Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares used in computing
  earnings per share ...............................         12,514,517         12,088,541         12,504,563         12,024,979
                                                            ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========

Net income .........................................        $ 2,545,000        $ 2,870,000        $ 4,245,000        $ 5,027,000
                                                            ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========

Earnings per share .................................        $      0.20        $      0.24        $      0.34        $      0.42
                                                            ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1851 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow personal exemptions 

under the individual alternative minimum tax, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2007 

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself and Mr. BUNNING) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow personal exemptions under the individual alternative minimum tax, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Families First 

5 Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR PERSONAL EX7 EMPTIONS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL ALTER8 NATIVE MINIMUM TAX. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 56(b)(1)(E) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard deduction 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 1851 IS

1 and deduction for personal exemptions) is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘, the deduction for personal exemptions under 

3 section 151, and the deduction under section 642(b)’’. 

4 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for sec5 tion 56(b)(1)(E) is amended by striking ‘‘AND DEDUCTION

6 FOR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2006. 

10 SEC. 3. ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION OF INDIVIDUAL AL11 TERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX EXEMPTION 

12 AMOUNT. 

13 Section 55(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

14 (relating to exemption amount) is amended by adding at 

15 the end the following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(4) ADJUSTMENTS FOR INFLATION.—In the 

17 case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 

18 2007, each of the dollar amounts in paragraphs (1) 

19 and (3) shall be increased by an amount equal to— 

20 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

21 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter22 mined under section (1)(f)(3) for the calendar 

23 year in which the taxable year begins, deter24 mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2006’ for 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•S 1851 IS

1 ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 

2 thereof. 

3 If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sen4 tence is not a multiple of $10, such amount shall be 

5 rounded to the nearest multiple of $10.’’. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC60 with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 2038

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. ( 3:22

- cv - 00019

- GMG

- RWT )

Submitted : June 15, 2023 Decided: June 20, 2023

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant U nited States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2038 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. , appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Hairston v. R.R. Ret. Bd. , No.
3:22

- cv - 00019

- GMG

- RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 22, 2022) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-2038 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), Jeffery C. Swank, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Jeffery C. Swank                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jeffery C. Swank                                                                                                           |
| President and Principal Executive Officer                                                                                  |
| Date:  March 31, 2006                                                                                            |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000769131
<NAME>                        Rancon Realty Fund IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,418
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    10,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,540
<PP&E>                                         31,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 48,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          783
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   48,997
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,097
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (975)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (9.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (9.99)
        




</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Nicholas Scandore, Appellant.

Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Appellate Part, Second Department,

May 27, 1957.

*Albert Finkelstem*for appellant.

*153
      *Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Seymour B. Quel*and *Anthony Curreri*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment of conviction of defendant, Nicholas Scandore, on each offense charged is reversed on the law and the facts.

The defendant is charged in five complaints numbered 7725, 7726, 7727, 7728, 7729, with violations of Park Department Rules and Regulations and the Administrative Code of the City of New York.

All the offenses are alleged in the complaints to have been committed on September 3, 1953, at 10:00 a.m. By agreement of the parties all were tried together.

The trial herein was a protracted one and the record thereof is lengthy.

There is nothing in the record to establish that the violations were committed on the date and time alleged in the complaints.

There also exists doubt whether the named defendant was the record owner of the said premises on the date the violations were allegedly committed. To establish ownership of the premises in the defendant, the People offered in evidence a photostatic copy of a deed executed by the Parkville Amusement Corporation to Nicholas Scandore recorded on June 30, 1944. There is no evidence whatsoever that this deed is the last deed of record and that title was still in the said named grantee on the date and time in question. There is no explanation of the intervening period, nor is there any statement by anyone that there were no intervening conveyances.

The evidence presented by the People was predicated upon two different theories of action and they were so intertwined during the trial that confusion resulted.

While the complaints do not allege continuing offenses, there is no question in the court’s opinion that the evidence indicates that some violations of that nature exist. The pleadings, however, do not raise this issue; the only issues raised by the pleadings are limited to September 3,1953, at 10:00 a.m. The People are not precluded from pursuing remedial action in regard to these violations since they are of a continuing nature.

We are of the opinion that, for the reasons stated, a reasonable doubt existed as to the guilt of this defendant.

Kozicke, P. J., Byrne and Cannella, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
#### Bennie MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46542.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1973.

John L. Sanders, San Antonio, for appellant.

Ted Butler, Dist. Atty., Marvin Zimmerman and Michael P. Hodge, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is attempting to pass as true a forged instrument; the punishment, upon a plea of guilty, three (3) years.

The record reflects appellant waived his right to trial by jury and entered into an agreement to stipulate testimony. His affidavit which was introduced in evidence states that: “. . . all the acts and allegations in said indictment charging the offense of Attempted Passing as True a Forged Instrument arc true and correct ...”

Appellant’s court appointed attorney has filed a brief stating that he has carefully reviewed the record and concludes the appeal is wholly without merit. In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Cr.App.1969), he submits one contention which might arguably be raised on appeal. See also Woods v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 487 S.W.2d 344; Hicks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 670; Sasueda v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 476 S.W.2d 289. We have examined the same and find it without merit.

In further compliance with Anders, supra, and Gainous, supra, counsel has furnished a copy of his brief to appellant. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

No motion for rehearing will be filed by the Clerk except by leave of this Court upon a showing of good cause.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee
 for the Hugoton Royalty Trust:

We are aware that Cross Timbers Oil Company has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statement No. 333-81849 on Form S-8, and that Cross Timbers Oil
Company and Hugoton Royalty Trust have incorporated by reference in their
Registration Statement No. 333-35830-01 on Form S-8, Hugoton Royalty Trust's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, which includes our report dated
May 5, 2000, covering the unaudited interim financial information contained
therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is
not considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by
our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
May 11, 2000

                                                                             18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0502 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NICHOLAS LEE WINZENBURG,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 14 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2021

05/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0502
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Code Committee Meeting

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the forthcoming public meeting of the 
Code Committee established by Article 146(a), Uniform Code of Military 
Justice, 10 U.S.C. 946(a), to be held at the Courthouse of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 450 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20442-0001, at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, March 9, 2010. The 
agenda for this meeting will include consideration of proposed changes 
to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-
Martial, United States, and other matters relating to the operation of 
the Uniform Code of Military Justice throughout the Armed Forces.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. DeCicco, Clerk of Court, 
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 450 E Street, 
Northwest, Washington, DC 20442-0001, telephone (202) 761-1448.

    Dated: January 28, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-2127 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 23.2

CALHOUN, BLAIR & ASSOCIATES

PETROLEUM
CONSULTANTS

4625 GREENVILLE AVENUE, STE. 102

DALLAS, TEXAS 75206

(214) 522-4925

FACSIMILE: (214) 346-0310

RGBLAIR@SWBELL.NET

February 22, 2010

Dorchester Minerals, L.P.

3838 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 300

Dallas, TX   75219

Gentlemen:

Calhoun, Blair & Associates does
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-124544) or Dorchester Minerals, L.P. of our estimated reserves included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K including, without limitation,
Exhibit 99.1, and to all references to our firm included in this Annual Report.



CALHOUN, BLAIR & ASSOCIATES/s/ Robert G. Blair, P.E.Robert G. Blair, P.E.President