Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices 59603 

14See 15 CFR 766.24(e) (indicating that within 

five working days after receipt of a recommended 

decision concerning a TDO appeal, the Under 

Secretary is to issue a written order affirming, 

modifying, or vacating the recommended decision. 

lack of appropriate evidence to support 

its written appeal further substantiates 

the public need to affirm the Assistant 

Secretary’s TDO. Exhibit 16. 

IV. Conclusion 

I hereby find that BIS has met the 

standard required by section 766.24 of 

the Regulations and has introduced 

evidence that the potential violations 

under investigation are significant, 

deliberate and covert, and not merely 

technical or negligent, It was and is 

reasonable to believe that the temporary 

denial order is required in the public 

interest to prevent an imminent 

violation of the Act, the Regulations, or 

any order, license or other authorization 

issued under the Act. 

Therefore, I recommend that TDO 

issued by the Assistant Secretary on 

June 6, 2008, and modified on July 10, 

2008 be affirmed and Respondents’ 

corresponding appeal be denied. 

Accordingly, I am referring this 

Recommended Decision and Order to 

the Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security for review and 

final action for the agency, without 

further notice to the respondent, as 

provided in section 766.24 of the 

Regulations.14

[REDACTED SECTION] 

Done and Dated, September 16, 2008, New 

York, NY. 

The Honorable Walter J. Brudzinski, 

Administrative Law Judge. 

ATTACHMENT A, Exhibit Lists 

A. BIS Exhibits 1–16: 

1. June 6, 2008 Order Temporarily Denying 

Export Privileges. 

2. July 10, 2008 Order Modifying 

Temporary Denial of Export Privileges. 

3. June 25, 2008 Article Entitled ‘‘Iran Air 

Drops Plans to Buy Russian Aircraft Over 

Cost Fears.’’ 

4. September 10,2008 Letter to Mr. Thomas 

Madigan, Director Office of Export 

Enforcement. 

5. August 5th and August 25th Letters 

Regarding U.S. Department of Treasury 

Records Search. 

6. August 7, 2008 Letter to Mr. Hamit 

Kahveci, World Focus Airlines. 

7. September 10, 2008 Declaration of Tracy 

E. Martin. 

8. Excerpt of IranAir Web site. 

9. Current Appointments Report for: 

GALAXY AVIATION TRADE COMPANY 

LTD. 

10. Airframe History of B.747 msn 24134. 

11. Photographs of airplane. 

12. July 25, 2008 Letter to Office of the 

Administrative Law Judge from Galaxy 

Aviation Trade Company Ltd. 

13. June 27, 2008 Letter to Director of 

General Civil Aviation Authority Pakistan 

from the Republic of Turkey Ministry of 

Transport. 

14. September 11, 2008 Declaration of John 

Sonderman. 

15. May 20,2008 Aircraft Sale and 

Purchase Agreement. 

16. Aero Transport Data Bank (world wide 

fleet list) publicly available at http:// 

www.aerotransport.org/. 

B. Respondents did not file any exhibits. 

C. ALJ Exhibit 1: 

1. BIS’s Recommended Decision and Order 

Received September 16, 2008. 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that I have served the 

foregoing RECOMMENDED DECISION AND 

ORDER as indicated below to the following 

person(s): 

Mario Mancuso, Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Industry and Security, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, Room H–3892, 

14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, Fax: 202–482– 

2387. (By Facsimile and Federal Express.) 

Gregory Michelsen, Attorney-Advisor, 

Attorney for Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Office of Chief Counsel for 

Industry and Security, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Room H–3839, 14th Street & 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230, Fax: 202–482–0085. (By 

Facsimile and Federal Express.) 

Galaxy Aviation Trade Company Ltd. and 

Hooshang Seddigh, 15 Moreland Court, 

Lyndale Avenue, Finchley Road, London, 

UK NW2 2PJ. (By First Class Mail, Postage 

Prepaid.) 

Hamid Shakeri Hendi, 5th Floor, 23 Nafisi 

Avenue, Shahrak Ekbatan, Karaj Special 

Road, Tehran, Iran. (By First Class Mail, 

Postage Prepaid.) 

Hossein Jahan Peyma, 2/1 Makran Cross, 

Heravi Square, Moghan Ave., Pasdaran 

Cross, Tehran, Iran. (By First Class Mail, 

Postage Prepaid.) 

ALJ Docketing Center, Attention: Hearing 

Docket Clerk, 40 S. Gay Street, Room 412, 

Baltimore, Maryland 21202–4022, Fax: 

(410) 962–1746. (By Facsimile and Federal 

Express.) 

Done and dated this 16th day of September, 

2008 at New York, New York. 

Regina V. Maye, 

Paralegal Specialist to the Hon. Walter J. 

Brudzinskj, Administrative Law Judge. 

[FR Doc. E8–23726 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–351–840) 

Certain Orange Juice from Brazil; 

Notice of Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 9, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 25, 2008, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published a 

notice of initiation of administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain orange juice fromBrazil. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 22337 (April 25, 2008). The 

period of review is March 1, 2007, 

through February 29, 2008, and the 

preliminary results are currently due no 

later than December 1, 2008. The review 

covers two producers/exporters of the 

subject merchandise to the United 

States. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping order within 245 days after 

the last day of the anniversary month of 

the date of publication of the order. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further 

provides, however, that the Department 

may extend the 245–day period to 365 

days if it determines it is not practicable 

to complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. We determine 

that it is not practicable to complete this 

administrative review within the time 

limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act because of certain technical 

issues contained in supplemental 

questionnaire responses. Analysis of 

these issues requires additional time. 

Therefore, we have fully extended the 

deadline for completing the preliminary 

results until March 31, 2009. The 

deadline for the final results of the 

review continues to be 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This extension notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: October 3, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–24022 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES