alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of


EAU
Technologies, Inc.


1890 Cobb
International Blvd, Ste. A


Kennesaw,
GA 30152





As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 27, 2009 (which includes an
emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern), relating to the financial statements of EAU
Technologies, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and to all
references to our Firm, included in or made part of this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos.
333-148222 and 333-148223).





/s/ HJ
& Associates, LLC





HJ &
Associates, LLC


Salt Lake
City, Utah


March 27,
2009
INRAD, Inc.
                               181 Legrand Avenue
                               Northvale, NJ 07647
                                                                   Exhibit 10.21
Mr. Peter Turnquest                                            December 31, 1998
Clarex Limited
P.O. Box N3016
Nassau, Bahamas

Dear Mr. Turnquest:

This letter is written to evidence the agreement between Inrad, Inc. (the
"Company") and you, with respect to your $1,000,000 principal sum plus $200,000
of accrued interest to December 31, 1998 which the company presently owes you
(the Indebtedness) on your subordinated convertible note of December 15, 1993.

By signing below, you hereby agree that as payment for the entire amount of this
Indebtedness of $1,200,000 you will receive 960,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock (the "Shares").

You further acknowledge that the Indebtedness represents the entire amount owed
to you by the Company for borrowed money as of the date hereof (as opposed to
compensation and benefits).

By signing below, you also represent to the Company that: ( i ) you are able to
bear the economic risk of the investment in the Shares, ( ii ) you recognize and
agree that the Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended ( the "Act"), ( iii) you recognize and agree that you will be
required to continue to bear the risk of investment in the Shares for an
indefinite period, ( iv ) you recognize and agree that such Shares must be held
by you indefinitely unless a subsequent disposition is registered under the Act
or is exempted from registration under all applicable federal and state
securities laws, ( v ) you recognize and agree that the Company will enter stop
transfer notations in its records with respect to the stock certificates
representing the shares, ( vi ) you have knowledge and experience with respect
to the Company and its business and in financial and business affairs generally
so that you are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective
investment; ( vii ) the Shares are being acquired for your own account for
investment purposes and not with the view of resale or distribution thereof by
you and (viii) you recognize and agree that a restrictive legend will be placed
on the certificates representing the Shares summarizing the restrictions on
transferability outlined above. At the request of Clarex, the company will make
its best efforts to register the Shares, only if it qualifies to use Securities
and Exchange commission Form S3.

Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing below.

Very truly yours,


James L. Greco
Chief Financial Officer

Agreed to as of the 31st day of December, 1998

Clarex Limited
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| To Executive: | Carol Wirsbinski |
|---------------|------------------|

|   | Eagan, MN  55123 |
|--------|----------------------------|

----

| HICKORYTECH CORPORATION |
|-------------------------|

| By: /s/ John W. Finke                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Its:  President and Chief Executive Officer |

| /s/ Carol Wirsbinski   |
|------------------------|
| Carol Wirsbinski  |
|                   |

----
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 6, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.120 Federal Government Retirement Funds1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 21.0 - List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant


   The following is a list of subsidiaries meeting the requirements of Exhibit
21.

   a)   The Grant County Bank (incorporated in West Virginia), doing business as
        The Grant County Bank.

   b)   Capon Valley Bank (incorporated in West Virginia), doing business as the
        Capon Valley Bank.

   c)   HBI Life Insurance Company, Inc. (incorporated in the state of Arizona),
        doing business as HBI Life.
#### Hardin P. WILLOUGHBY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 2, 1973.

Hardin P. Willoughby, pro se.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., J. T. Frank-enberger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice STEPHENSON,

Affirming.*
#### HANEY v. HANEY.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



   <ARTICLE> 5
          
   <S>                            <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
   <PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
   <CASH>                             837,204
   <SECURITIES>                       763,350
   <RECEIVABLES>                    1,687,418
   <ALLOWANCES>                             0
   <INVENTORY>                         84,307
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,600,627
   <PP&E>                           1,703,237
   <DEPRECIATION>                   1,367,146
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                   4,142,554
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              252,962
   <BONDS>                                  0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
   <PREFERRED>                              0
   <COMMON>                         2,813,248
   <OTHER-SE>                       1,058,390
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     4,142,554
   <SALES>                            855,157
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                 2,570,206
   <CGS>                            1,764,474
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                   721,210
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     959
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                    303,901
   <INCOME-TAX>                        76,013
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
   <DISCONTINUED>                           0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
   <CHANGES>                                0
   <NET-INCOME>                       227,888
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                          .08
   <EPS-DILUTED>                          .07
           
   
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 9, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1. Mason National Bancshares, Inc.*; to engage                     *de novo*                     through its subsidiary, Mason National Bank, both of Mason, Texas, in lending activities pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Augusts 20, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-21083 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### NAIVETTE, Incorporated, v. The PHILAD COMPANY et al.

No. 7661.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1937.

Maurice S. Cayne, of Chicago, 111., and Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, and Hull, Brock & West, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal Jn this cause be and same is dismissed, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Stock Market Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Smitten, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.


                                        /s/ Richard Smitten
                                        -----------------------
                                        Richard Smitten
                                        CEO and CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,063,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,082,156
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,650,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,715
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,605,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,650,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,297
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              Arthur Andersen LLP



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 21, 2000 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-37505 and
333-88297) and Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-68351 and
333-77619).


                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
 March 13, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
INTRAWARE, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,182
<SECURITIES>                                     4,468
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                       360
<INVENTORY>                                     14,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,997
<PP&E>                                           6,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,594
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,604
<SALES>                                         60,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,386
<CGS>                                           45,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (16,446)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,324)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0477. JEREMIAH CARBON v. P FIN 11, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After the

magistrate court issued a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendant Jeremiah

Carbon appealed to superior court. The superior court also ruled in favor of the

plaintiff, and Carbon appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

“[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower

courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary

appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); see also

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because Carbon did not follow the proper procedure for

obtaining appellate review, we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 30, 2018

10/30/2018
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 16, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40119 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LEONEL HERNANDEZ FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-601-1

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Leonel Hernandez Flores (Hernandez) appeals the sentence that he received after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation. Hernandez argues that the district court’s sentence under Guidelines it deemed mandatory was plain error under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). He also argues that the district court’s increase in his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a 1999 California drug conviction was plain error, a point the Government concedes.No. 05-40119 -2- Under the terms of the plea agreement, Hernandez expressly waived the right to appeal his sentence but retained the right to appeal “a sentence imposed above the statutory maximum” or “‘an upward departure.’” At the rearraignment, the magistrate judge explained to Hernandez that under the terms of his agreement he gave up his right to appeal his case but told Hernandez: “You could appeal for an illegal sentence, however.” The Government seeks to enforce the appeal waiver. The magistrate judge, however, failed to comply with F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11(b)(1)(N) when he described the appeal waiver because the right to appeal an illegal sentence is broader than the right to appeal only a sentence imposed in excess of the statutory maximum or an upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines. Given the district court’s Rule 11 error, we cannot conclude that Hernandez knowingly waived his right to appeal the district court’s application of the Guidelines. United States v. Robinson , 187 F.3d 516, 517-18 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994). Therefore, we do not enforce the appeal waiver. In light of our recent decision in United States v. GarzaLopez , 410 F.3d 268, 273-75 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 10, 2005) (No. 05-5892), the district court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) was reversible plain error. Thus, Hernandez’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for resentencing.No. 05-40119 -3- Because Hernandez’s sentence is vacated, this court need not address his argument that the district court committed error under Booker by sentencing him under a mandatory guidelines regime. See Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d at 275 & n.2.
VACATED; REMANDED.
812 A.2d 362

#### R.C.G. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF KEYPORT; THE BOROUGH OF KEYPORT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND CORPORATE BODY POLITIC AND A *&*K EXCAVATING, L.L.C., A NEW JERSEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND EMARA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND MAHARAJ CONSTRUCTION, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Argued October 7, 2002

Decided January 6, 2003.

*Thomas Daniel McCloskey*argued the cause for appellant *0Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel,*attorneys).

*Gordon N. Litwin*argued the cause for respondents Mayor and Council of the Borough of Keyport and the Borough of Keyport *(Ansell Zaro Grimm & Aaron,*attorneys; *Mr. Litwin and Andrew J. Provence,*on the briefs).

*Raymond Springberg*argued the cause for respondent *A & K Excavation, L.L.C.*

*Steven A. Berkowitz*argued the cause for amici curiae, *Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 322 and Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 9.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Havey’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 346 *N.J.Super.*58, 786 A.2d 895 (2001).

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 7.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

p0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

147611(33)

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147611

COA: 311811

Gratiot CC: 11-011662-CK

LAURIE BOWERS, CARL BOWERS,

JULIE BOWERS and NICHOLAS BOWERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

27, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.