alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
         PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         I, Jean L. Koenck, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report of First
National Master Note Trust.

         2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this Annual Report.

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports.

         4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement.

         Dated: March 29, 2004           /s/ Jean L. Koenck
                                         ------------------
                                         Jean L. Koenck
                                         Vice President, First National Bank of
                                         Omaha
1 “[#246]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00422-REB-04

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

4. RICHARD CROSSE,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE 

_____________________________________________________________________

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the United States’ Motion for Final Order of

Forfeiture [#246]1

 filed June 13, 2013. The Court having reviewed the Motion FINDS:

THAT a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture was entered on March 14, 2013;

THAT all known interested parties were provided an opportunity to respond and

that publication was properly effected as required by 21 U.S.C. § 853(n);

THAT no Petition for Ancillary Hearing has been filed by any petitioner, and the

time for so doing has expired; and

THAT it further appears there is cause to issue a forfeiture order under 21 U.S.C.

§ 853.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, DECREED, AND ADJUDGED:
2

1. That the United States’ Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture [#246] filed

June 13, 2013, is GRANTED;

2. That judgment of forfeiture of the following property SHALL ENTER in favor of

the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 free from the claims of any other party:

a. miscellaneous marijuana grow equipment seized on June 10, 2011,

from 3885 Forest Street, Denver, Colorado; and

b. miscellaneous marijuana grow equipment seized on October 13,

2011, from 3885 Forest Street, Denver, Colorado; and

3. That the United States SHALL HAVE full and legal title to the forfeited

property and may dispose of it in accordance with law.

Dated June 17, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1916 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1916

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to modify the program for the 
 sanctuary system for surplus chimpanzees by terminating the authority 
 for the removal of chimpanzees from the system for research purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chimp Haven is Home Act''.

SEC. 2. SANCTUARY SYSTEM FOR SURPLUS CHIMPANZEES; TERMINATION OF 
              AUTHORITY FOR REMOVAL FROM SYSTEM FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--The first section 481C of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 287a-3a) (added by section 2 of Public Law 106-
551) is amended in subsection (d)--
            (1) in paragraph (2), in subparagraph (J), by striking ``If 
        any chimpanzee is removed'' and all that follows; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)--
                            (i) by striking clause (ii); and
                            (ii) by striking ``except as provided'' in 
                        the matter preceding clause (i) and all that 
                        follows through ``behavioral studies'' and 
                        inserting the following: ``except that the 
                        chimpanzee may be used for noninvasive 
                        behavioral studies'';
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B);
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (B); and
                    (D) in subparagraph (B) (as so redesignated), by 
                striking ``under subparagraphs (A) and (B)'' and 
                inserting ``under subparagraph (A)''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Part E of title IV of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is amended by redesignating the 
second section 481C (added by section 204(a) of Public Law 106-505) as 
section 481D.

            Passed the Senate December 13, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1916

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to modify the program for the 
 sanctuary system for surplus chimpanzees by terminating the authority 
 for the removal of chimpanzees from the system for research purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     392,505
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           438,265
<PP&E>                                      21,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                 636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             459,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      340,815
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    18,901
<OTHER-SE>                                  99,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               459,419
<SALES>                                    115,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           115,159
<CGS>                                       15,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              626,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (509,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (509,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (509,454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.030)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.030)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2078 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2078

 To prohibit Federal funding for motorcycle checkpoints, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2014

 Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, and 
 Mr. Manchin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal funding for motorcycle checkpoints, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Motorcycle Checkpoint Funding 
Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANT RESTRICTION.

    Notwithstanding section 153 of title 23, United States Code, the 
Secretary of Transportation may not provide a grant or any funds to a 
State, county, town, township, Indian tribe, municipality, or other 
local government that may be used for any program--
            (1) to check helmet usage; or
            (2) to create checkpoints that specifically target 
        motorcycle operators or motorcycle passengers.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.10.12
 SIXTH AMENDMENT AGREEMENT  AMENDED AND
RESTATED LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 SIXTH AMENDMENT AGREEMENT Sixth Amendment th
 FLEET
RETAIL FINANCE INC. Lender
  BAKERS
FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC., Borrower
  RECITALS:
 Loan Agreement
 Purchase
Agreement Registration Rights
Agreement
  :
 DEFINITIONS.
 AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT.
 Acceleration of Other Debt. Breach of Lease
 provided however




---



##### 



FURTHER AGREEMENTS; WAIVERS.
   ADDITIONAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REPRESENTATIONS.
 RATIFICATION OF LOAN DOCUMENTS; NO CLAIMS AGAINST LENDER. WAIVES RELEASES
 CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS.
    2




---



##### 



MISCELLANEOUS.
     7.5 THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED, GOVERNED, AND
ENFORCED PURSUANT TO THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
MASSACHUSETTS AND SHALL TAKE EFFECT AS SEALED INSTRUMENT.
  3




---



##### 



BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.,F/K/A Weiss And Neuman Shoe Co.By
    
    /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley Jr.Name
    
    Lawrence L. Spanley Jr.Title
    
    Executive Vice President, CFOFLEET RETAIL FINANCE INC.By
    
    /s/ James J. WardName
    
    James J. WardTitle
    
    Managing Director
MICHAEL FOODS, INC.

                       SEVERANCE PLAN EXTENSION RESOLUTION


RESOLVED, that the Severance Pay Plan for Eligible Employees of Michael Foods,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Severance Plan"), as approved and implemented in
accordance with the directives of the Board of Directors on July 26, 1990 and
extended through July 1, 1997, be hereby extended for a period of one additional
year to a new Termination Date of July 1, 1998.

         Number of employees covered under the Severance Plan
            from July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997.............................. 18

         Employees removed:
            William McGrath - Michael Foods
            Thomas Welna - Michael Foods
         Employee added:
            Mark Westphal - Papetti's Hygrade

         Number of employees covered under the Severance Plan
            from July 1, 1997 to July 1, 1998 ............................. 17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00425-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. FRANCISCO FRANCO-OROZCO,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

Upon Defendant’s Notice of Disposition (Doc 18 - filed November 28, 2011), and it

appearing that Defendant will plead to a Class B misdemeanor, it is

ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Duty Magistrate Judge for further

proceedings. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing set December 7, 2011 is VACATED.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: December 1, 2011
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00116

- CV

L.H.

v.

N.H. §

§

§

§ From the 158th District Court

of Denton County (2013

- 20350

- 158)

December 3, 2015

Opinion b y Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant L.H. shall pay all of the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**ALTERA CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Altera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Timothy R. Morse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the UnitedStates Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Date: August 6, 2007

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained byAltera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002**




In
                connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
                the year
                ended February 28, 2007 (the "Report") by PaperFree Medical Solutions,
                Inc., the
                undersigned hereby certifies that:
 
 1.
                The
                Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of
                section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 
 2.
                The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects
                the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.
  Date:
                            May 25, 2007
                        By:
                            /s/ STEPHEN HAWKSWORTHName:
                            Stephen HawksworthTitle:
                            President &
CEO
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jose CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

July 16, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASS’N, etc., v. WESTERN WOMEN’S CLUB.

No. 8699.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 1937.

See, also, 93 F.2d 189.

Louis Ferrari and Geo. D. Schilling, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Byrne, Lamson & Jordan, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12
                                       
                              AMOCO COMPANY
                         ______________________
                                       
               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF
                          EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (millions of dollars, except ratios)

                                                                      
                             Six                                      
                            Months                                    
                            Ended            Year Ended December 31,     
                           June 30,  
                             1997      1996     1995    1994    1993    1992
Determination of Income:                                              
Consolidated earnings                                                 
 before income taxes                                                  
 and minority interest...    $1,520  $3,351   $2,425  $2,688  $2,427  $1,823
Fixed charges expensed by                                             
 consolidated companies..       133     251      233     140     193     238
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
  by the equity method...        (4)     76       10       7       9      18
Adjusted earnings plus                                                
 fixed charges...........    $1,649  $3,678   $2,668  $2,835  $2,629  $2,079
                                                                      
Determination of Fixed Charges:                                       
Consolidated interest on                                              
 indebtedness (including                                              
 interest capitalized)...    $   96  $  164   $  152  $  127  $  162  $  219
Consolidated rental                                                   
 expense representative                                               
 of an interest factor...        43      88       71       7      31      20
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
 by the equity method....         4       8        6       5       6      12
Total fixed charges......    $  143  $  260   $  229  $  139  $  199  $  251
                                                                      
Ratio of earnings to                                                  
 fixed charges...........      11.5*   14.2*    11.6*   20.4    13.2     8.3
                                                                      


*Based  on public debt obligations. Including debt with affiliates,  the
ratio  would  have been 4.8 as of June 30, 1997, 5.5 as of December  31,
1996, and 4.4 as of December 31, 1995.

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
#### Elthel VAUGHT v. The KROGER COMPANY et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 19, 1973.

David E. Klein, Frockt & Benovitz, Louisville, for appellant.

William Mellor, Mellor & Shaw, Louisville, for appellees.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner GARDNER,

Affirming.*
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130188 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROSE M. WRIGHT, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 130188 

 COA: 255075 

Midland CC: 02-005630-NI 

ROBERT M. VOLWAY and TRACI 

ANN VOLWAY,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
#### WELLS v. MORGAN & LINDSEY, Inc., et al.

No. 3130.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1949.

William J. Daly, New Orleans, H. Minor Pipes, Houma, for appellant.

Jones, Flanders, Waechter & Walker, New Orleans, Elton A. Darsey, Houma, Ellender & Wright, Houma, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The application for rehearing in this case is based principally on the proposition that in our opinion we failed to comment on certain evidence which plaintiff Wells considers very material to the issues involved herein.

We did not then, and do not now, attach any probative value to the fact that the beam was not offered in evidence. The evidence shows that the supporting columns of the stockroom were being replaced by iron posts and we fail to see where plaintiff’s case would be strengthened by the introduction of the beam in question. The material fact is that plaintiff in replacing the columns with the iron posts was guilty of gross negligence as shown by the evidence.

The mere fact that Miss Blahut paid or sustained the loss of the damages done by the collapse does not in itself show any liability on her part. That was strictly a ' business arrangement between herself and her tenant.

After a case review of the record, we are unable to find any material error committed by us and we must therefore deny the ap- ■ plication for rehearing.
Exhibit 12.1

Serologicals Corporation  Fixed Charges (in thousands)

Three Months Ended

Six Months EndedJune 27,
2004

June 29,
2003

June 27,
2004

June 29,
2003Pre-tax net income from continuing operations

7,693

2,686

12,145

5,641Fixed charges (d)

1,716

1,904

3,265

2,204Pre-tax net income excluding fixed charges (c)

9,409

4,590

15,410

7,845Ratio (d)/(c)

5.48

2.41

4.72

3.56Interest expense (a)

1,189

1,510

2,246

1,627Plus capitalized interest

272

96

469

110Rent Expenseincluding SSB

773

903

1,668

1,415times 33%

33
%
33
%
33
%
33
%Interest in Rent Expense

255

298

550

467Fixed charges (d)

1,716

1,904

3,265

2,204


---

---



QuickLinks