alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**ALTERA CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Altera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Timothy R. Morse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the UnitedStates Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Date: May 8, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained byAltera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

32
#### Lloyd Ray SETTLE, Appellant, v. Nancy Mitchell SETTLE, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 9, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1974.

Clyde Foster Chesnut, Elkton, for appellant.

Charles H. Gill, Jr., Elkton, G. S. Milam, Russellville, for appellee.

Appeal from Todd Circuit Court; William G. Fuqua, Judge.

Memorandum Opinion by Commissioner CATINNA, Affirming*
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-03-309-CV

IN RE CLIFFORD ROY FLEMING	RELATORS

AND JAMANS TRUCKING

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED October 24, 2003
Order entered June 25, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00545-CR

THOMAS DAMIEN MCLEAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31671

ORDER

The clerk’s record, filed May 22, 2018, does not contain the jury charge on 

guilt/innocence or the jury charge on punishment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a).

 We ORDER the Hunt County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the jury charge on guilt/innocence and the jury charge on punishment within TEN 

DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### Alfred Lee WEBB, Appellant, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellee.

No. 6230.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

Nov. 10, 1971.

Kerr, Fitz-Gerald & Kerr, Wm. Monroe Kerr, James Fitz-Gerald III, Midland, for appellant.

Willie B. DuBose, County Atty., John A. Woodside, Asst. County Atty., Midland, for appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is a driver’s license revocation case, tried de novo, without a jury, in the County Court of Midland County under the provisions of Section 22(b) and 22(c) of Article 6687b, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.Statutes, and wherein the Appellant’s Texas Driver’s License number 5481398 was revoked. The Department of Public Safety alleged that the Appellant was subject to immediate and uncontrollable sleeping spells, wherein he was unable to drive safely. The Appellant’s primary point is to the effect that no evidence was offered in the trial Court to sustain these pleadings. The attorney for the Department candidly admits that there was no evidence to support the Court’s finding of the Appellant’s inability to drive an automobile, and a search of the record sustains that position. It is incumbent upon the Department to plead in writing its cause of action and to then carry its burden of proof upon the pleadings made. Knight v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 361 S.W.2d 620 (Tex.Civ.App. Amarillo 1962, no writ hist.); Department of Public Safety v. Guleke, 366 S.W.2d 662 (Tex.Civ.App. Amarillo 1963, no writ hist.). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial Court is reversed and judgment here rendered that revocation of the Appellant’s driver’s license be denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 207 

To restrict the sale, lease, transfer, retransfer, or delivery of F–16 aircraft, 

M1 tanks, or certain other defense articles or services to the Government 

of Egypt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2013 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. JOHANNS, and Mr. 

COBURN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To restrict the sale, lease, transfer, retransfer, or delivery 

of F–16 aircraft, M1 tanks, or certain other defense 

articles or services to the Government of Egypt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN MILITARY SALES TO 

4 EGYPT. 

5 The United States Government may not allow the 

6 sale, lease, transfer, retransfer, or delivery of F–16 air7 craft, M1 tanks, or certain other defense articles or serv8 ices to the Government of Egypt until the President cerVerDate Mar 15 2010 18:38 Feb 08, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S207.IS S207

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 207 IS

1 tifies to Congress that the Government of Egypt has 

2 agreed— 

3 (1) to continue to uphold its commitments 

4 under the Camp David Peace Accords; 

5 (2) to provide proper security at United States 

6 embassies and consulates pursuant to the Vienna 

7 Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna 

8 April 24, 1963; and 

9 (3) to bring stability to Egypt by ending its sys10 tematic exclusion and silencing of all official minor11 ity political opposition and taking concrete steps to 

12 engage in dialogue with such opposition parties and 

13 consider a coalition, power-sharing government with 

14 such opposition parties. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1755 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1755

   To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to make 
  permanent the summer food service pilot project for rural areas of 
   Pennsylvania and apply the program to rural areas of every State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2007

Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Specter) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to make 
  permanent the summer food service pilot project for rural areas of 
   Pennsylvania and apply the program to rural areas of every State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Summer Food Service Rural Expansion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PILOT PROGRAM FOR RURAL AREAS OF 
              PENNSYLVANIA MADE PERMANENT AND APPLIED TO RURAL AREAS OF 
              EVERY STATE.

    Section 13(a)(9) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(a)(9)) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``Exemption'' and 
        inserting ``Applicability to rural areas''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``For each of calendar 
        years 2005 and 2006 in rural areas of the State of 
        Pennsylvania'' and inserting ``For calendar year 2007 and each 
        calendar year thereafter, in rural areas of a State''.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 16, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.122 Mutual Funds 1** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 6, 2008*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.225  Life Insurance and Pension Fund Reserves** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of an Unsolicited P01 
Application,
    Date: November 12, 2008,
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Quirijn Vos, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#463730293506282f272f2268282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b0a0d14083b15121a121f55151213551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 6, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-24212 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Walter H. BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 46283, 46284.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Paul W. Jones, Jr., Austin, for appellant.

Robert O. Smith, Dist. Atty. and Michael J. McCormick, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*77OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

These are appeals from convictions for robbery by assault with firearms. The punishment was assessed in each case at 25 years after a finding of guilt upon pleas of not guilty entered before the court following waiver of trial by jury.

In Cause No. 46,283, J. B. Smith testified he was robbed of $80.00 or $90.00 by four colored males on December 28, 1971 at his grocery store in Del Valle, Travis County, Texas. On cross examination, he testified “ . . . that man there looks like the one that held the gun on me.”

A Jax beer delivery man identified the appellant as the man he saw coming out of the store on the date in question and that, upon entering the store, he found Smith and his wife tied up inside the store.

Appellant’s extrajudicial confession was admitted into evidence.

The appellant offered no evidence.

In Cause No. 46,284, Elaine Brooks, Manager of the Austin State Hospital Credit Union, testified that on September 30, 1971, the appellant and two other men entered her office and robbed her at gunpoint of approximately $1,900.00 in currency and checks. Another employee corroborated the appellant’s identification.

An employee of the State Hospital testified that earlier she had seen the appellant walking back and forth in front of the credit union office on the date in question.

Appellant’s extrajudicial confession of this offense was admitted into evidence.

Appellant offered no evidence.

In each of these cases, appellant’s court appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly without merit. Aware of his duties under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the procedure recommended by Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), counsel has furnished a copy of the brief in each case to the appellant, and the record in each case reflects the entire appellate record was made available to the appellant. No pro se brief has been filed in either case.

After a careful examination of the record, we conclude the appeals are without merit.

The judgments are affirmed.
EX-10.5




 Exhibit 10.5 

INVESTAR HOLDING CORPORATION 
 2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
COMPENSATION PLAN 
 NOTICE OF EXCHANGE AND ASSUMPTION 

(Restricted Stock) 
 Name: 

Number of Unvested Shares: 
 Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Exchange between Investar Bank and Investar Holding Corporation (the “Company”), in November, 2013, Investar Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and each outstanding share of common stock, $1.00 par value per share,
issued by Investar Bank (“Bank Stock”) was exchanged for one share of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued by the Company (“Company Stock”). 

Previously, you were issued shares of Bank Stock under one or more restricted stock awards made by the Board of Directors of Investar Bank; the aggregate
number of unvested shares that you held immediately before the exchange is shown above. In accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Exchange, your unvested Bank Stock has now been converted to a like number of shares of unvested Company Stock
(“Company Restricted Stock”). Your Company Restricted Stock has been assumed and will now be administered under the Company’s 2014 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, a copy of which is attached. In all other respects, the terms
and conditions of your award or awards, as determined by the Board of Directors of Investar Bank, including the vesting schedule and the circumstances under which your award or awards may be forfeited, remain in force and effect. 

You can request copies of your individual awards of restricted stock by contacting Rachel Cherco at rachel.cherco@investarbank.com. You should retain a
copy of this letter and the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for your records. 
 Attachment: 2014 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
#### In the Matter of Jory Construction Corp., Petitioner. Westchester Square Sash & Door Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

November 29, 1956.

*702
      *Joseph Heller*for petitioner.

*Burton J. Bloom*for respondent.

Samuel W. Eagek, J.

This is an application pursuant to subdivision (6) of section 19 of the Lien Law to vacate a notice of mechanic’s lien. The question here is as to whether or not the notice of lien was filed within the four months’ period. It is well settled that where a notice of lien is sufficient according to the face thereof and the recording data, the court may not, upon summary application, pass on disputed issues of fact, and, on resolving them in owner’s favor, discharge the lien. (See *Matter of Miller,*133 N. Y. S. 2d 421 and cases cited.) Here, by the data appearing upon the notice of lien, it would appear to have been timely filed, but, on the other hand, an itemized statement furnished by the lienor pursuant to section 38 of the Lien Law would indicate that the lien was not filed within a period of four months from the time of last furnishing of materials. While I agree with dicta of Justice Hogan in *Matter of J. D. H. Builders*(155 N. Y. S. 2d 121, 122) “ that the itemized statement, in effect a bill of particulars, may.be considered in determining the sufficiency of the notice of lien ’ ’, I believe that where there is a discrepancy between the notice of lien and the bill of particulars, a bill of particulars would be amendable in accordance with the true facts. A notice of lien may be amended (see Lien Law, § 12-a) so, why not a bill of particulars.

It is true that the owner presents very convincing evidence that the lien was not timely filed, and there is a charge of fraud. However, we have here to support the claim of timely filing, a *verified*notice of lien giving a specific date as the date of the last furnishing of materials (which date shows a filing within the four months’ period); and *an affidavit*by the secretary of the lienor that, “ a typographical error which went unnoticed appears in said statement,” — that is, as to the date appearing in the statement furnished pursuant to section 38 of the Lien Law. I am not convinced that *these statements under oath*are “patently false and dishonest” as claimed by the owner’s attorney, for such is indeed a serious charge, and, in any event, I feel there is an issue of fact here which may not be resolved on summary application.

The remedy of the lienor is to bond the lien (see Lien Law, § 19, subd. [4]) or to require foreclosure (see Lien Law, § 59) and move for summary judgment.

Submit order on notice.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Tassone,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

·              The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·              The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/  James A. Tassone                      |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | James  A. Tassone, Chief Financial Officer |

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and willbe retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

1

----
Exhibit 99.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Healthy Planet Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Gregory C. McPherson, Interim President, serving as the
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: November 13, 2002                     /S/ Gregory C. McPherson
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Gregory C. McPherson
                                                Interim President
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Healthy Planet Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Antonio H. Santiago, Vice President Finance, serving as the
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: November 13, 2002                     /S/ Antonio H. Santiago
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Antonio H. Santiago
                                                Vice President Finance
                                                (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21266]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Notice to cancel EAC public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission has cancelled the EAC 
closed session meeting scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2010, 9-11 
a.m. EDT. The meeting was announced in a sunshine notice that was 
published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 in 
Volume 75, Number 159.

Person to Contact for Information: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Donetta Davidson,
Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-21266 Filed 8-23-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P