alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                            431
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                     804
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,277
<PP&E>                         49,659
<DEPRECIATION>                (32,864)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 18,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,667
<BONDS>                             0 
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                       (295) <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   18,072
<SALES>                         1,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,078
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (195)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     (195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (0.164)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.164)<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Partner equity - 1,190 Partnership units outstanding.
<F2> Per Partnership Unit in thousands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.5


                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
                                 -----------------------------



We consent to the use in the Form S-4 Registration Statement and Prospectus of
Aviation Group, Inc. of our reports dated September 17, 1999 and April 19, 2000,
respectively, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Aviation
Group, Inc. and the financial statements of Epoch Technology, Inc. contained in
such Registration Statement, and to the use of our name and the statements with
respect to us, as appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.

/s/ Hein + Associates LLP

Hein + Associates LLP
Certified Public Accountants


June 21, 2000
Dallas, Texas
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 10813 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Claudia P. Rodriguez,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21
- CR
- 516 - 2

**________________ ______________**  Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Claudia P. Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 12, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10813 Document: 00516818454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2023No. 22
- 10813

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further r esponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-10813 Document: 00516818454 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2023
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 20 

To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

JOHANNS, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. COBURN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. 

SHELBY, Mr. HELLER, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. LEE, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. 

CRUZ, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. 

ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Takeover 

5 Repeal Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

8 Protection Act (Public Law 111–203) is repealed, and the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 20 IS

1 provisions of law amended by such Act are revived or re2 stored as if such Act had not been enacted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.44

[Swiss Re Logo]

ADDENDUM NO. 1

to
the

UMBRELLA
LIABILITY QUOTA SHARE
REINSURANCE AGREEMENT
NO. POR327548
(hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement")

between
SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY
SAFETY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
both of Boston, Massachusetts
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company")

and

SWISS
REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION
Armonk, New York
(hereinafter and thereinafter referred to as the "Reinsurer")

It
is understood and agreed that as respects policies in force at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, September 1, 2007, and new and renewal policies becoming effective on and after said date,
this Agreement is amended as follows:

SAFETY
INSURANCE COMPANY
SAFETY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
SAFETY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
all of Boston, Massachusetts
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company")

ALL
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.

1.
No. POR327548
    Addendum No. 1

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed in duplicate, by their duly authorized representatives as of the following dates:

In
Boston, Massachusetts, this 12 day of DEC, 2007.

|ATTEST:                                                  |  | SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY
SAFETY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
SAFETY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Glenn Hiltpold, FCAS                                 |  | /s/ Edward N. Patrick, Jr.                                                                                
|Glenn Hiltpold, FCASName                                 |  | Edward N. Patrick, Jr.Name                                                                                
|Director of Actuarial ServicesTitle                      |  | Vice President, UnderwritingTitle                                                                         
|And in Armonk, New York, this 17th day of October, 2007.
|ATTEST:                                                  |  | SWISS REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION                                                                     
|/s/ Jeffrey Isaacson                                     |  | /s/ Matthew Fay                                                                                           
|Jeffrey IsaacsonName                                     |  | Matthew FayName                                                                                           
|Vice President
Member of ManagementTitle                 |  | Senior Vice President
Member of Senior ManagementTitle                                                    

ds
Safety POR327548 add#l

2.
No. POR327548
    Addendum No. 1

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deanna L. Spooner, VicePresident — Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)                                      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)                                      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | August 13, 2009 |   | /s/ Deanna L. Spooner                                        |
|--------|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   | Deanna L. Spooner                                            |
|   |                 |   | *Vice President — Finance and Administration  and* |
|   |                 |   | *Chief Financial Officer*                                    |
|   |                 |   |                                                         |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2268-000]


FC Landfill Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 19, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of FC Landfill Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is September 8, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="581e1d0a1b17363431363d0b2d2828372a2c183e3d2a3b763f372e">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21229 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 34.3

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” that HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Applicable Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions secured by private label credit card receivables that are identified in management’s “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company's activities.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 16, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TERRY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Below,

Appellant,

v.

THE BLUFFS LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, 

Defendant-Below,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§ No. 291, 2014

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ C.A. No. N13C-10-359

§

§

§

Submitted: June 11, 2014

 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices.

O R D E R

This 1st day of July 2014, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Terry Williams, has petitioned this Court, under 

Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an interlocutory appeal from a Superior Court 

order dated May 13, 2014. The Superior Court order granted the motion of the 

appellee, The Bluffs Limited Partnership (“The Bluffs”),1to vacate a default 

judgment obtained by Williams. 

 

1 According to papers filed by the appellee in the Superior Court, The Bluffs Limited Partnership 

is incorrectly named in the caption of the Superior Court complaint. The appellee appears to 

have indicated that the relevant entity is The Bluffs Apartments, which is owned by Sheldon 

Limited Partnership, LP and managed by RIMSI Corp.
2

(2) Williams filed an application for certification of an interlocutory 

appeal and/or a stay of the proceedings in the Superior Court on May 19, 2014. 

The Bluffs responded to the certification application on May 29, 2014. Williams 

filed this interlocutory appeal on June 2, 2014. 

(3) On June 5, 2014, the Superior Court denied Williams’ application for 

certification of an interlocutory appeal and/or a stay of the proceedings. On June

11, 2014, Williams filed a supplemental notice of appeal with the Superior Court’s 

order denying his certification application.

(4) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 

discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.2 

Having considered the Superior Court’s May 13, 2014 order and the Superior 

Court’s denial of Williams’ certification application, this Court has concluded that 

the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme 

Court Rule 42 and should be refused.

 

2

Supr. Ct. R. 42.
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this interlocutory appeal is 

REFUSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Florida Community Banks, Inc.'s ("Company") Annual Report on
      Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 ("Report"), as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and to
      which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Guy W. Harris, the
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
            March
                15, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Guy W. HarrisGuy
                W. HarrisChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Florida Community Banks, Inc. and will be retained by Florida Community Banks,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 10, 2011*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.117 Life Insurance Companies** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



Exhibit 10.1(c)
 2003-000016-J
 HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT
NO. 03-016 FOR THE
METRO-NORTH HEALTH REGION
BETWEEN
PUERTO RICO HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
AND
TRIPLE S, INC.
 31 th day of October, 2006 PUERTO RICO HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION Minerva Rivera, Esq. TRIPLE S, INC. INSURER Socorro Rivas
 WITNESSETH
  WHEREAS: ADMINISTRATION INSURER st Metro-North Health Area/Region Bayamón, Cataño, Comerío, Corozal, Dorado, Guaynabo, Naranjito,
Toa Alta, Toa Baja and Vega Alta.




---



##### 



WHERAS: ADMINISTRATION st
 HENCEFORTH:
 ARTICLE XVIII
PAYMENT OF PREMIUMS
 In Article XVIII paragraph three (3) letters (a) to (e) are deleted, substituted with the following
to read as follows:
 3.
    
    a.The final monthly premiums rates for all beneficiaries, including all those who are
sixty-five (65) years and older who are Medicare beneficiaries Part A or Part A
and B those who are sixty-five years and older who are not Medicare recipients
is establish in eighty dollars and nine cents ($80.09) per member per month (pmpm).
 b.
    
    The aforementioned premium rate constitutes the finalrates for the period
beginning July 1st, 2006 to October 31, 2006. Payments will be made from
account number 5030-113.c.
    
    The premium payments made July 1st, 2006 to October 31, 2006, will
be adjust to reflect the difference between that interim rate and this final agreed
premium rate. The stop-loss for the 4 months period will be $5,500.00.d.
    
    For the period beginning November 1st, 2006 to September 30, 2007 a
different rate will be negotiated between the parties in accordance with the new
coverage that will become effective on November 1st, 2006.
 The present amendments take precedence and shall prevail over any remaining sections and articles
of the contract which are maintained but could conflict with these amendments.
 2




---



##### 



31 day of October, 2006.
 /s/ MINERVA RIVERA, ESQ

MINERVA RIVERA, ESQExecutive DirectorPuerto Rico Health Insurance Administration/s/ SOCORRO RIVAS

SOCORRO RIVASChief Executive OfficerTriple S, Inc./s/ LUIS A. MARINI, DMD

LUIS A. MARINI, DMDChief Executive OfficerTriple-C, Inc.
 3
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OH N F OR R E S T Z UMB R O, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. V I N C E C U L L E N , A c t i ng W a r de n, M A R G A R IT A P E R E Z , C hai rm an, B oard o f P ri so n T erm s, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17045 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 6 - c v - 0 6 0 1 0 - R MW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R ona l d M . W hy t e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , L E A V Y , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rJ ohn F orr e s tZ um br o appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED MA R 10 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17045 2 Z um br o c ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d’ s 2004 de c i s i on t o de nyhi m pa r ol e w a s not s upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e ” a nd the r e f or e vi ol a t e d hi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s . T he on l y f eder alri gh tati ss ue i n the parol e c on t exti s proce du ra l , and the on l y proper i nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, notw he the rthe s t a t e c ourtde c i de d the c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S . C t . 8 5 9 , 8 6 2 -6 3 (2 0 1 1 ). B ecau se Z u m b r o r a is e s n o p r o c e du r a l c h a lle n g e s , w e a f f irm . Z um br o’ s m ot i on t o e xpa nd the r e c or d on appe a l i s de ni e d. A FFI R M ED .