alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768608                       
<NAME>                        Robert McCready
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    USD
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Feb-23-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             Feb-26-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               Aug-25-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                       2,778,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0   
<RECEIVABLES>                               50,355,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,436,000
<INVENTORY>                                 50,096,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           100,305,246
<PP&E>                                      85,543,386
<DEPRECIATION>                              45,888,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,712,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       59,142,839
<BONDS>                                     85,827,695
<COMMON>                                       259,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,313,333
<PREFERRED>                                  1,366,631
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,723,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,712,084
<SALES>                                    101,456,209    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,456,209
<CGS>                                       68,381,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,381,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            70,026,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,399,215
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,151,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (49,361,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   140,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (49,501,196)    
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (49,843,356)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(1.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(1.99)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John W. Finke, Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof HickoryTech.
| /s/ John W. Finke                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| John W. Finke                         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 3, 2007                           |

 

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

UUSI, LLC,

Appellant

v.

WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS , INC., Appellee

______________________

2016

- 1517

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014

- 00650.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OSEPH B ARBER

, Howard & Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by

D ANIEL B LISS

, G ERALD E. M C G LYNN III , Royal Oak, MI

.

C HARLES S ANDERS , Latham & Watkins LLP, Bos ton, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by G ABRIEL
B ELL

, G ABRIELLE L A H ATTE

, Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK

, W ALLACH

, and H UGHES

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Techwell, Inc. (the "Company") for the annual period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark Voll, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:



/s/ MARK VOLL Mark Voll Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 11, 2009


---
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Isaac J. Gaon, Chief Executive Officer of Datatec Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended January 31, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
CERTIFICATION

     I, Andrew D. Owens, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Quality
     Exchange, Inc.;

  2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
     not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     annual report; and

  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this annual report, fairly
     present in all material respects the financial position,
     results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer as of, and
     for, the periods presented in this annual report.

  4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I am
     responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
     14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
       that material information relating to the registrant, including its
       consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
       those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
       report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
       filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
       our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

  5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
       internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
       ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
       have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
       weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
       or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
       internal controls; and

  6.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
     that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
     to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
     material weaknesses.


Date:  March 25, 2004

/s/ Andrew D. Owens
--------------------
     President
     Chief Executive Officer
     Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Efficient Networks, Inc.:

     We consent to the use of our reports on the consolidated financial
statements of Efficient Networks, Inc. incorporated by reference herein, which
reports appear in the Efficient Networks, Inc. Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-94289) declared effective by the Commission on
February 2, 2000.

                                                  KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas

September 5, 2000
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 9, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.219 Multifamily Residential Mortgages** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 99c

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harry Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2002 of Black Gardenia Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
  registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
  prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
  evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
  internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
  the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
  internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: March 31, 2003 | /s/ Harry Miller
    _______________________
    Harry Miller, Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Provide a separate certification for each principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant. See Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
<PAGE>
             FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                

      THIS  FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment")
made as of April 15, 1998 by and between MMI Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") and B. Frederick Becker (the "Employee").

                       W I T N E S S E T H
                                
       WHEREAS,  the  parties  have  entered  into  that  certain
Employment  Agreement  dated as of May 1, 1997  (the  "Employment
Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS,  the Personnel and Compensation Committee  of  the
Board  of  Directors of the Company desires to provide additional
incentives  to  Employee to further the  best  interests  of  the
Company and has approved an increase in Employee's Maximum  Bonus
(as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement);

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1.    The  second paragraph of Paragraph 4 of the Employment
       Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

            "Upon   successful  achievement  of   the
            agreed upon goals, such annual bonus will
            equal  up to 65% of the Employee's annual
            salary or such higher amount as the Board
            of  Directors  or Compensation  Committee
            may  determine  if circumstances  warrant
            (`Maximum Bonus')."
            
     2.    Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement  is
       ratified and affirmed in all respects.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
as of the date first above written.


MMI COMPANIES, INC.


By:                                     _________________________
___________________________              B. Frederick Becker
Senior   Vice   President
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)Date:  March 30, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-634
In Re: MILTON J. TAYLOR, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-946-AM)

No. 98-7424
MILTON J. TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KATHLEEN HAWKS; PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, Judge; JANET RENO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-946-AM) Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: March 12, 19992 Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. No. 98-634 petition denied and No. 98-7424 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton J. Taylor, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Milton Taylor, a federal prisoner incarcerated in Virginia, seeks to challenge the district court’s order transferring an action to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. To that end, he has filed both an appeal of the transfer order (No. 98-7424), and a mandamus petition seeking an order returning the action to the Eastern District of Virginia (No. 98- 634). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in both actions.Taylor challenged his sentence and sought release; accordingly, the district court did not err in construing his complaint as a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Because the only court with jurisdiction to consider Taylor’s § 2255 motion is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the district court properly transferred the case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (1994); Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court , 410 U.S. 484, 497 (1973); see generally Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925, 927-28 (4th Cir. 1986) (finding that transfer orderentered pursuant to § 1631 based on lack of jurisdiction is reviewable on appeal). Accordingly, we affirm the transfer order in No. 98-7424, and we deny Taylor’s motion to expedite as moot. In his mandamus petition, Taylor seeks an order transferring the case back to the Eastern District of Virginia. Because we haveconcluded that the transfer order was not improper, we deny the petition in No. 98-634. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.4 1987) (mandamus relief may only be granted when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 98-634 - PETITION DENIED No. 98-7424 - AFFIRMED
because the State pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the

presumption of prejudice to the State. 

### See NRS 34.800.

Appellant asserted that relief was warranted because he recently discovered that the State of Nevada was performing mass genocide on the inmate population. Appellant failed to demonstrate good cause and prejudice sufficient to overcome the procedural bars. Moreover, appellant failed to overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State. Therefore, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons , J.

J.



## r - 

## cm.PA Pickering , J.

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Stephen F. Ciolino Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Caust Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I94Th
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1654 

To prohibit the sale or provision of caller ID spoofing services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2007 

Mr. KYL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the sale or provision of caller ID spoofing 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 Section 1040 of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever, using any means or facil8 ity of interstate or foreign commerce— 

9 ‘‘(1) knowingly generates, transmits, or causes 

10 to be generated or transmitted— 


cnoel on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

S 1654 IS

1 ‘‘(A) false caller ID information with in2 tent wrongfully to obtain anything of value; or 

3 ‘‘(B) caller ID information pertaining to 

4 an actual person or other entity without that 

5 person’s or entity’s consent and with intent to 

6 deceive any person or other entity about the 

7 identity of the caller; or 

8 ‘‘(2) knowingly offers, sells, or makes available 

9 a service that enables users to modify, generate, or 

10 transmit false or misleading caller ID information or 

11 attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as 

12 provided in subsection (b).’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(f) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (a)(2) does not pro15 hibit offering, selling, or making available any such service 

16 that transmits, in the signaling data with each call, (1) 

17 information sufficient to indicate to the recipient’s tele18 phone carrier that the caller ID information is not accu19 rate, (2) if available, the originating telephone number or 

20 other information identifying the origin of the call, and 

21 (3) the identity of the provider of the service that enabled 

22 the user to modify, generate, or transmit the chosen caller 

23 ID information.’’. 

Æ 


cnoel on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CRESCENT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, Manfred Sternberg, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Communications,
Inc., hereby certify that Crescent Communications, Inc.'s periodic report on
Form 10-QSB, for the period ending June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of Crescent Communications, Inc.



Date: August 23, 2004                     /s/  Manfred Sternberg
                                          ----------------------
                                          Manfred Sternberg
                                          Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>