alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex-10.14

 EXHIBIT 10.14
 

 KEY LINK ASSETS CORP.
 NOTE PAYABLE
 $500
 

 

 

 March 13, 2014
 Chicago, Illinois
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Key Link Assets Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of Shawn Clark, together with any successors or assigns (collectively, the "Holder"), the principal sum of Five-Hundred Dollars (US $500). The Note is non-interest bearing and bears no collateral.
 

 The Note will be paid in full on June 30, 2015. The Company may redeem the Notes in part, or in full, prior to the due date of the Note.
 

 Payments of principal shall be made at the place that Holder from time to time shall direct in writing, or, in the absence of direction, at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661.
 

 Upon a default by the undersigned to make any payment due hereunder, and continuing for five (5) calendar days after notice has been given to the undersigned, and at the option of the Holder, all of the unpaid indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall become immediately due and payable and shall accrue interest at the highest rate of interest then permitted by law.
 

 This Note is submitted by the undersigned to the Holder in Chicago, Illinois and shall be deemed to have been made thereat. This Note shall be governed and controlled by the laws of the State of Illinois as to interpretation, enforcement, validity, construction, effect, choice of law, and in all other respects.
 

 To induce the Holder to accept this Note, the undersigned irrevocably agrees that, subject to the Holder's sole and absolute election, all actions and proceedings in any way, manner or respect arising out of or from or related to this Note shall be litigated in courts having situs within the County of Racine, State of Wisconsin, the undersigned hereby covenants and submits to the jurisdiction of any local, state or federal court located within said county and state.
 

 Any notice, designation, demand, consent or request required herein to be given or to be served upon the undersigned by the Holder shall be deemed to have been given or served upon mailing, if addressed to the undersigned at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661, or upon actual receipt by the undersigned.
  
 In the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all expenses, including, without limitation, attorney fees, incurred by the Holder in endeavoring to enforce the rights of Holder hereunder.
 

 Key Link Assets Corp.
 

 

 By: /s/ Shawn Clark
       Shawn Clark, Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6528

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

OWEN ODMAN, a/k/a Charles Llewelyn, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-LHT-1; 1:04-cv-00044-LHT) 

Submitted: October 15, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Owen Odman, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Owen Odman appeals the district court’s order granting 

in part and denying in part relief from a pre-filing injunction. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-LHT-1 

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EX-10.6




 Exhibit 10.6 

INVESTAR HOLDING CORPORATION 
 NOTICE OF ASSUMPTION AND
EXCHANGE 
 (Warrants) 
 Name: 

Number of Unexercised Warrants: 
 Pursuant to an Agreement and
Plan of Exchange between Investar Bank and Investar Holding Corporation (the “Company”), in November, 2013, Investar Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and each outstanding share of common stock, $1.00 par value per
share, issued by Investar Bank (“Bank Stock”) was exchanged for one share of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued by the Company (“Company Stock”). 

You are the registered holder of warrants to acquire Bank Stock; the aggregate number of warrants that you held unexercised immediately before the exchange is
shown above. In accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Exchange, your warrants have now been assumed by the Company and converted to a like number of rights to acquire Company Stock. In all other respects, the terms and conditions of your
warrants, as originally determined by the Board of Directors of Investar Bank, including the exercise price and the expiration date, will remain in force and effect, except to the extent your warrants were issued on April 30, 2009, in which
event the expiration date of such warrants has been extended until 30 days after the issuance of a Notice of Effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Company’s Registration Statement filed on Form S-1. 

If you have any questions about the exchange, you should contact Rachel Cherco at rachel.cherco@investarbank.com. Ms. Cherco can also provide you with
information about the terms of your warrants.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2103 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue 

or revise regulations with respect to the medical certification of certain 

small aircraft pilots, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2014 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue or revise regulations with respect to 

the medical certification of certain small aircraft pilots, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘General Aviation Pilot 

5 Protection Act of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2103 IS

1 SEC. 2. MEDICAL CERTIFICATION OF CERTAIN SMALL AIR2 CRAFT PILOTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

5 Federal Aviation Administration shall issue or revise med6 ical certification regulations to ensure that an individual 

7 may operate as pilot in command of a covered aircraft 

8 without regard to any medical certification or proof of 

9 health requirement otherwise applicable under Federal law 

10 if— 

11 (1) the individual possesses a valid State driv12 er’s license and complies with any medical require13 ment associated with that license; 

14 (2) the individual is transporting not more than 

15 5 passengers; 

16 (3) the individual is operating under visual 

17 flight rules; and 

18 (4) the relevant flight, including each portion 

19 thereof, is not carried out— 

20 (A) for compensation, including that no 

21 passenger or property on the flight is being car22 ried for compensation; 

23 (B) at an altitude that is more than 

24 14,000 feet above mean sea level; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2103 IS

1 (C) outside the United States, unless au2 thorized by the country in which the flight is 

3 conducted; or 

4 (D) at a speed exceeding 250 knots. 

5 (b) COVERED AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, 

6 the term ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means an aircraft that— 

7 (1) is not authorized under Federal law to carry 

8 more than 6 occupants; and 

9 (2) has a maximum certificated takeoff weight 

10 of not more than 6000 pounds. 

11 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

12 Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment 

13 of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad14 ministration shall submit to Congress a report that de15 scribes the impact that the regulations issued or revised 

16 under section 2 have had, including statistics with respect 

17 to changes in small aircraft activity and safety incidents. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert L. Bailey hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert L. Bailey                 
|                       |  |     |  | Robert L. Bailey                     
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Charles W. HUGGETT, Guardian of Henry E. Costello, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7340.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 9, 1937.

Wilkin, Huggett & Lightner, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges, and RAYMOND, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The court being of the opinion that the evidence does not indisputably show that Henry E. Costello was totally and permanently disabled while the policy sued on was in force, and it appearing that no question touching the admission and exclusion of evidence was properly preserved for review, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment be and is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO LOPEZ

- GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72453

Agency No. A200

- 898

- 337

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 26, 2017 **

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N. R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Antonio Lopez

- Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petition s for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal procee dings.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72453

denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo questions of law

. Chuen Piu

Kwong v. Holder , 671 F.3d 872, 880 (9th Cir. 2011). W e deny the petition for

review.

As to Lopez

- Garcia’s contentions regarding ineffective assistance of

counsel, t he agency did not err in den ying Lopez

- Garcia ’ s motion to reopen where

he failed to comply with the requirements of Matter of Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec.

637 (BIA 1988), and any ineffective assistance was not plain on the face of the

record, see Castillo

- Perez v. INS , 212 F.3d 518, 525 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Reyes

v. Ashcroft , 35 8 F.3d 592, 597 (9th Cir. 2004) (ineffective assistance of counsel

claim failed where petitioner did not submit a personal affidavit outlining his

agreement with his former attorney and describing th e attorney’s alleged

misconduct, and there was no evidence petitioner’s former attorney had been

notified of his ineffective assistance allegations)

.

As to Lopez

- Garc ia’s remaining contentions , t he agency did not abuse its

disc retion in denying his motion to reopen where he failed to set forth evidence

that was material and not available and could not have been discovered or

presented at Lopez

- Garcia’s former immigration hearing. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(1); Goel v. Gonzales , 490 F.3d 735, 738 (9th Cir. 2007) (“If [the3 14

- 72453

evidence sought to be offered] was available or capable of being discovered at [the

former hearing] , it cannot provide a basis for reopening.”) (citation omitted).

PETITIO N FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XX08


Marine Mammals; File No. 15471

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given that Michael Adkesson, D.V.M., Chicago 
Zoological Society, 3300 Golf Rd., Brookfield, IL 60527, has been 
issued a permit to import specimens from South American fur seals for 
scientific research.

ADDRESSES:  The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376; and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 
01930; phone (978)281-9328; fax (978) 281-9394;

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Laura Morse or Jennifer Skidmore, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 29, 2010, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (75 FR 37389) that a request for a permit to 
import biological samples taken for scientific research from South 
American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis) had been submitted by the 
above-named applicant. These samples are part of an ongoing health 
assessment studies in Punta San Juan, Peru. There will be no non-target 
species taken incidentally under this permit because the permit would 
only cover import and possession of samples from animals taken legally 
under other permits. The requested permit has been issued under the 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the regulations governing the taking and 
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: August 23, 2010.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21407 Filed 8-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7522 In Re: JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-98-45) Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jermaine Jerrell Sims petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion pending since May 15, 2002. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition without prejudice to the filing of another such petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40352

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUILLERMO DE JESUS ESCOBEDO-CANTU,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1526-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guillermo De Jesus 

Escobedo-Cantu has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Escobedo-Cantu has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40352 Document: 00512473485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40352

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40352 Document: 00512473485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan F. Krock hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                       |  |     |  |                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Alan F. Krock           
|                       |  |     |  | Alan F. Krock               
|                       |  |     |  | Vice President,             
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                       |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Notice of the Record of Decision for the United States Marine 
Corps Grow the Force at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps 
Air Station New River, and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 
4332(2)(c), the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality 
(CEQ) for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of 
Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500-1508), the Department of the Navy 
NEPA regulations (32 CFR part 775), and the Marine Corps Environmental 
Compliance and Protection Manual, which is Marine Corps Order P5090.2A 
w/change 2 (MCO P5090.2A), the Department of the Navy (DON) announces 
its decision to implement the permanent incremental increase in 
personnel at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps Air 
Station (MCAS) New River, and MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina.
    More specifically, this action includes: (1) New infrastructure 
construction (e.g. buildings, roads, utility lines); (2) demolition 
and/or upgrades to existing infrastructure; and (3) relocating existing 
units and personnel to consolidate and better support the combat 
missions. Implementation of this action will be accomplished as set out 
in the Preferred Alternative and described in the Final Environmental 
Impact Statement (Final EIS) of December 11, 2009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The complete text of the Record of Decision 
is available for public viewing on the project Web site at http://www.growtheforcenc.com along with copies of the Final EIS and 
supporting documents. For further information, contact Grow the Force 
in North Carolina EIS Project Manager, Naval Facilities Engineering 
Command, Mid-Atlantic, Building C Room 3012, 6505 Hampton Blvd., 
Norfolk, VA 23508-1278. Telephone: 757-322-4942.

    Dated: January 22, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-2118 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alan F. Krock hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an
officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                       |  |     |  |                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Alan F. Krock           
|                       |  |     |  | Alan F. Krock               
|                       |  |     |  | Vice President,             
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                       |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer