Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices 52345 

It also appears that for some of these 

same shipments, Sinicway acted as a 

common carrier in relation to its 

NVOCC customers and issued its own 

NVOCC bill of lading. The electronic 

tariff published by Sinicway appears to 

indicate that only Cargo NOS rates were 

in effect since July 17, 2009. However, 

as indicated by Sinicway’s invoices, the 

rate assessed by Sinicway to its NVOCC 

customers appears to differ substantially 

from its published Cargo NOS rates. 

Accordingly, it appears that Sinicway 

provided service that was not in 

accordance with its published tariff, in 

violation of 10(b)(2) of the Shipping Act. 

Now therefore, it is ordered, That 

pursuant to sections 10, 11, and 13 of 

the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 41102, 

41104, and 41107–41109, an 

investigation is instituted to determine: 

(1) Whether Sinicway International 

Logistics Ltd. violated section 10(a)(1) of 

the Shipping Act by obtaining 

transportation at less than the rates and 

charges otherwise applicable by an 

unjust or unfair device or means; 

(2) Whether Sinicway International 

Logistics Ltd. violated section 10(b)(2) 

of the Shipping Act by providing service 

other than at the rates, charges, and 

classifications set forth in its published 

NVOCC tariff or applicable NSA; 

(3) Whether, in the event violations of 

sections 10(a)(1), and 10(b)(2) of the 

Shipping Act are found, civil penalties 

should be assessed against Sinicway 

International Logistics Ltd. and, if so, 

the amount of penalties to be assessed; 

(4) Whether, in the event violations of 

section 10(b)(2) of the Shipping Act are 

found, the tariff(s) of Sinicway 

International Logistics Ltd. should be 

suspended; and 

(5) Whether, in the event violations 

are found, an appropriate cease and 

desist order should be issued. 

It is further ordered, that a public 

hearing be held in this proceeding and 

that this matter be assigned for hearing 

before an Administrative Law Judge of 

the Commission’s Office of 

Administrative Law Judges at a date and 

place to be hereafter determined by the 

Administrative Law Judge in 

compliance with Rule 61 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 46 CFR 502.61. The hearing 

shall include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the 

presiding Administrative Law Judge 

only after consideration has been given 

by the parties and the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge to the use of 

alternative forms of dispute resolution, 

and upon a proper showing that there 

are genuine issues of material fact that 

cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 

statements, affidavits, depositions, or 

other documents or that the nature of 

the matters in issue is such that an oral 

hearing and cross-examination are 

necessary for the development of an 

adequate record; 

It is further ordered, that Sinicway 

International Logistics Ltd. is designated 

Respondent in this proceeding; 

It is further ordered, that the 

Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement is 

designated a party to this proceeding; 

It is further ordered, that notice of this 

Order be published in the Federal 

Register, and a copy be served on 

parties of record; 

It is further ordered, that other 

persons having an interest in 

participating in this proceeding may file 

petitions for leave to intervene in 

accordance with Rule 72 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 46 CFR 502.72; 

It is further ordered, that all further 

notices, orders, and/or decisions issued 

by or on behalf of the Commission in 

this proceeding, including notice of the 

time and place of hearing or prehearing 

conference, shall be served on parties of 

record; 

It is further ordered, that all 

documents submitted by any party of 

record in this proceeding shall be 

directed to the Secretary, Federal 

Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 

20573, in accordance with Rule 118 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 46 CFR 502.118, and shall be 

served on parties of record; and 

It is further ordered, that in 

accordance with Rule 61 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, the initial decision of the 

Administrative Law Judge shall be 

issued by August 22, 2011 and the final 

decision of the Commission shall be 

issued by December 20, 2011. 

By the Commission. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21172 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New] 

Agency Information Collection 

Request. 60-Day Public Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Office 

of the National Coordinator for Health 

Information Technology (ONC), HHS 

In compliance with the requirement 

of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Office of the Secretary (OS), Department 

of Health and Human Services, is 

publishing the following summary of a 

proposed information collection request 

for public comment. Interested persons 

are invited to send comments regarding 

this burden estimate or any other aspect 

of this collection of information, 

including any of the following subjects: 

(1) The necessity and utility of the 

proposed information collection for the 

proper performance of the agency’s 

functions; (2) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (4) the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology to minimize the information 

collection burden. To obtain copies of 

the supporting statement and any 

related forms for the proposed 

paperwork collections referenced above, 

e-mail your request, including your 

address, phone number, OMB number, 

and OS document identifier, to 

Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call 

the Reports Clearance Office on (202) 

690–6162. Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collections must be directed 

to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer 

at the above e-mail address within 60 

days. 

Proposed Project: Evaluation of the IT 

Professionals in Health Care—OMB No. 

0990—NEW—Office of the National 

Coordinator for Health Information 

Technology (ONC). 

Abstract: The Office of the National 

Coordinator for Health Information 

Technology (ONC) Office of the Chief 

Scientist is soliciting comments on a 

series of data collection efforts for the 

Evaluation of the IT Professionals in 

Health Care. The Workforce Program, 

created under Section 3016 of the 

HITECH Act, was intended to provide 

‘‘assistance to institutions of higher 

education (or consortia thereof) to 

establish or expand health informatics 

education programs, including 

certification, undergraduate, and 

masters degree programs, for both health 

care and information technology 

students.’’ The evaluation of the 

Workforce Program is a new information 

collection activity which will explore 

program challenges, provide critical 

formative feedback to the Workforce 

grantee institutions on their activities, 

and determine whether the Workforce 

Program overall was successful in 

helping to build a skilled workforce 

equipped to meet the heightened 

demands of the current environment. 

The data collection efforts include: A 

Web-based baseline survey of 

community college students; course 

evaluation forms; focus groups with 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
52346 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices 

students, faculty members, and 

competency exam takers; and a Webbased survey of community college faculty. 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Forms Type of respondent Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average burden hours per 

response 

Total burden 

hours 

Web-based student baseline survey Students enrolled in workforce program 1,350 1 20/60 450 

Focus groups with students .............. Students enrolled in workforce program 256 1 1.5 384 

Focus groups with faculty ................. Instructors from workforce program 50 1 1.5 75 

Focus groups with exam takers ........ Competency exam takers not enrolled in workforce program 32 1 1.5 48 

Web-based faculty survey ................ Instructors from workforce program 300 1 10/60 50 

Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,007 

Seleda Perryman, 

Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction 

Act Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21070 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–45–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Office of the Secretary 

Findings of Scientific Misconduct 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) 

and the Assistant Secretary for Health 

have taken final action in the following 

case: 

Elizabeth Goodwin, PhD, University of 

Wisconsin-Madison: Based on the report 

of an investigation conducted by the 

University of Wisconsin-Madison (UWM) and additional analysis conducted 

by ORI in its oversight review, the U.S. 

Public Health Service (PHS) found that 

Elizabeth Goodwin, PhD, former 

associate professor of genetics and 

medical genetics, UW-M, engaged in 

scientific misconduct while her research 

was supported by National Institute of 

General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), 

National Institutes of Health (NIH), 

grants R01 GM051836 and R01 

GM073183. 

PHS found that the Respondent 

engaged in misconduct in science by 

falsifying and fabricating data that she 

included in grant applications 2 R01 

GM051836–13 and 1 R01 GM073183– 

01. 

PHS found that in grant application 

2 R01 GM051836–13, Respondent 

knowingly and intentionally: 

• Falsified Figures 5A and 5B by 

reusing figures from two of her earlier 

published papers and falsely labeling 

them to claim results that had not been 

achieved in her laboratory. 

• Falsified Figure 7B by reusing a 

figure from one of her published papers 

and both relabeling it to claim she had 

detected the STAR–2 protein rather than 

the TRA-l protein actually detected and 

modifying the image in the application 

to disguise its origin. 

• Falsified Figure 8C by using a figure 

produced by one of her students and 

relabeled it to show that RNAi treatment 

of C. elegans led to increased expression 

of the TRA–2 protein when this result 

had not been obtained by the student. 

• Falsified the table on Page 20 of the 

application showing phenotypic 

frequencies of worms expressing star-2 

(ok483) mutants by significantly 

overstating the level of aberrant 

phenotypes and fabricating certain 

categories of phenotypes not seen by the 

student conducting the research. 

PHS finds that in grant application 

1 R01 GM073183–01, Dr. Goodwin 

knowingly and intentionally: 

• Falsified Figure 5 because she used 

the same two lanes in both Figure 5 and 

Figure 7, although they were flipped 

horizontally in one of the figures to 

disguise their reuse. In Figure 7, the 

lanes illustrated an effect on laf-1 during 

developmental stages of C. elegans, and 

in Figure 5, the same lanes purportedly 

illustrated an effect on laf-1 noncoding 

RNA. A witness testified that the result 

in Figure 5 had not been observed, 

while that in Figure 7 had, indicating 

that the claims for Figure 5 were 

falsified. 

• Falsified Figure 8 by reusing 

photographs prepared by a student that 

identified the location of rRas-l 

expression in adult worms and claiming 

instead that the images illustrated the 

location of laf-1 mRNA. The images had 

been enlarged and cropped to disguise 

their location. 

Dr. Goodwin has entered into a 

Voluntary Exclusion Agreement in 

which she has voluntarily agreed, for a 

period of three (3) years, beginning on 

July 22, 2010: 

(1) To exclude herself from any 

contracting or subcontracting with any 

agency of the U.S. Government and from 

eligibility for, or involvement in, 

nonprocurement programs of the U.S. 

Government referred to as ‘‘covered 

transactions’’ pursuant to the HHS 

Implementation of OMB Guidelines to 

Agencies on Governmentwide 

Debarment and Suspension at 2 CFR 

376, et seq.; and 

(2) To exclude herself from serving in 

any advisory capacity to PHS, including 

but not limited to service on any PHS 

advisory committee, board, and/or peer 

review committee, or as a consultant. 

This Agreement is entered into 

pursuant to the terms of a plea 

agreement by and between the 

Respondent and the United States 

Attorney for the Western District of 

Wisconsin. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Director, Division of Investigative 

Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 

1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750, 

Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800. 

John Dahlberg, 

Director, Division of Investigative Oversight, 

Office of Research Integrity. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21048 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–31–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES