alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Affiliates, Inc. ( the
"Registrant" ) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the
"Quarterly Report" ), I, Michael Burke, President and Director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

( 1 ) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

( 2 ) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Registrant.


Dated : February 26, 2008         Signature :  /s/ Michael Burke
                                               --------------------------
                                                   Michael Burke
                                                   President and Director


<PAGE>
#### John W. YOUNG, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Labor, and Custodian of the Special Fund, Appellant, v. Raymond FRALEY et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 29, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1972.

Gemma M. Harding, Louisville, Thomas R. Emerson, Department of Labor, Frankfort, for appellant.

Perry & Greene, Paintsville, Fred G. Francis, Prestonsburg, for appellees.

NEIKIRK, Judge.

Raymond Fraley was awarded by the Workmen’s Compensation Board permanent total disability benefits, all to be paid by the Special Fund. The Floyd Circuit Court affirmed the Board’s award. From this judgment, the Special Fund appeals. We reverse.

Fraley had worked as a coal miner for over thirty years. On August 15, 1965, he voluntarily quit his employment as a coal miner. Thereafter, he attended a vocational school where he learned to be a draftsman. Since leaving the school, he has been employed by the Kentucky Department of Parks as a draftsman. At the time of the proceedings before the Board, he was earning $436 per month. His salary as a coal miner had averaged $90 per week.

As a result of a medical examination in December 1969, Fraley learned for the first time that he had silicosis or pneumo-coniosis. It was after this examination that he filed a claim with the Workmen’s Compensation Board. It was uncontro-verted that Fraley has silicosis or pneumo-coniosis and that as a result he can never return to his prior occupation as an underground coal miner.

The Special Fund contends that Osborne v. Johnson, Ky., 432 S.W.2d 800, applies to *885an occupational disease condition and that the Board and Floyd Circuit Court were in error in determining otherwise.

In Young v. Marsillett, Ky., 473 S.W.2d 128 (decided October 8, 1971), we held that the Osborne case is applicable to an occupational disease condition such as in the instant case.

The Marsillett case is dispositive of the issues presented on this appeal.

The judgment is reversed and remanded to the Board, with instructions to re-evaluate the percentage of disability in accordance with the Osborne case.

All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,802
<SECURITIES>                                    79,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,410,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               582,526
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,092,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          463,079
<BONDS>                                      7,410,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,395
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,092,530
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               442,286
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  464,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,426)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,545)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (7.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 5, 2008*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.104 Farm Business1** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: May 14, 2003


                                    /s/ David A. Dodd
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    David A. Dodd
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Director


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Serologicals Corporation and
will be retained by Serologicals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of U.S. Geothermal Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel J. Kunz,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: July 30, 2012

|/s/ Daniel J.
    Kunz  | 
|----------------------- | 
|Daniel J. Kunz          | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

U.S.GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel J. Kunz, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The annual report of U.S. Geothermal Inc. on Form 10-K
      for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (report), which this
      certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the business issuer.                                                                                                         



|Date: November 5, 2007  | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Daniel J.
    Kunz  | 
|Daniel J. Kunz          | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 

---
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jon Young, Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Star Gold Corp., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Liberty Star Gold Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 1, 2006

 

/s/ Jon Young

Jon Young

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2140 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2140

 To improve the transition between experimental permits and commercial 
           licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2014

  Mr. Heinrich (for himself, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve the transition between experimental permits and commercial 
           licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH LICENSING.

    Section 50906 of title 51, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``suborbital rocket 
        design'' and inserting ``suborbital rocket or rocket design''; 
        and
            (2) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
    ``(g) A permit may be issued, and a permit that has already been 
issued shall remain valid for the uses described in subsection (d), for 
a particular reusable suborbital rocket or rocket design after a 
license has been issued for the launch or reentry of a rocket of that 
design.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 33.1**

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA**

**PURSUANT TO ITEM 1122 OF REGULATION AB**

**FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA**

Date: March 27, 2015             

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First National Bank of Omaha (the “Servicer”), hereby certifies as follows:

(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in 17 C.F.R. § 229.1122(d)(“Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB”), except for servicing criteria specified in (1)(iii); (2)(iii) and (vi); 3(iii) and (iv); and 4(x) of Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, which the Servicer has determined are inapplicable to theactivities it performs with respect to the credit card asset backed securities transactions issued by First National Master Note Trust (the “Platform”) being serviced (such applicable criteria, after giving effect to the exceptionsidentified above, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 relating to the servicing of the Platform; 

(2) The Servicer used the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria;

(3) The Servicer is in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria relating to the Platform as of and for the year endingDecember 31, 2014 in all material respects; and 

(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014. 

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, as ServicerBy/s/ Timothy D. Hart
Timothy D. Hart

Senior VicePresident

[Signature page to Report on Assessment of Compliance 

of First National Bank of Omaha]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1309
MONA MOHAMMED ABDU, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-899-263) Submitted: December 10, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Israel W. Gobena, GOBENA & DE WALT, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Senior Litigation Counsel, Dalin R. Holyoak, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mona Mohammed Abdu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely and numerically barred her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See Barry v. Gonzales , 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006). Further, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. SeeZhao Quon Chen v. Gonzales , 492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,759
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,378
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,564
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        135,739
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,885
<DEPOSITS>                                     186,578
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,725
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,918
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 222,885
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,143
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,457
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   448
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,048
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,202
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,846
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      264
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,471
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    677
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         453
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       453
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,844
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,524
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       34
<RECOVERIES>                                        21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,775
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
1 “[#18]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02694-REB-KLM

CRYSTAL KOOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEBRA RILEY, Nurse Practioner [sic],

JUDY SIAZ, Nurse Practioner [sic], and

PAULA FRANZ,

Defendant.

ORDER WITHDRAWING THE

ORDER OF REFERENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c)

Blackburn, J.

This matter comes before the Court, sua sponte.

On January 23, 2012, an Order of Reference Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) [#18]1

was entered in this case. This order was entered in error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Order of Reference Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) [#18] entered

January 23, 2012, is VACATED and WITHDRAWN; and

2. That this civil action remains assigned to the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn,

United States District Judge.

Dated January 24, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02694-KLM Document 20 Filed 01/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6942** 

HARRY JAMES JONES , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00342

- FDW )

Submitted : September 23 , 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Harry James Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Harry James Jones seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his motion for a certificate of appealability . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge is sues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion to attach an amendment to his i nformal brief that was not before the district court , deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argum ent would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D