alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I,
Michael D. Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum Underwriters
Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this
Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
that the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
 
 
 Date:
      February 25, 2009
              /s/
      Michael D. PriceBy:
      Michael D. PricePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00390-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2022-02818-JP

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

DEVIN SCOTT, Appellant

V.

CREEKWOOD ROSEMEADE, LLC, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 6, 2022, and October 19, 2022, we notified Appellant Devin Scott, 

in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless Appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. 

Appellant has not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because Appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 17, 2022

1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
#### BLACKWELL v. DACUS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### City of Cleveland et al. *v.*Ruple. 

(No. 25486

Decided September 25, 1935.)

*Mr. Esra Z. Shapiro,*director of law, *Mr. Gordon C. Loche*and *Mr. Alfred Lawrence,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. E or wits, Kiefer £ Earmel,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Matthias and Day, JJ., not participating.
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Income RealEstate, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Report of Independent Public Accountants

 

To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and have issued our report thereon dated January 14, 2002.  We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2001, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Company was not in compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated May 1, 2001, in conjunction with the Closed End Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 2001-1 insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the Companys system of internal accounting controls over the Companys closed end home equity loan portfolio, including those loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation, which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  However, certain procedures included in the audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that, in our opinion, Section 3.11 of the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and should not be used for any other purpose.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois

January 14, 2002
ex10-48.htm



EXHIBIT 10.48




 



PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 




	$50,000.00  	April 30, 2014












For value received, Guardian 8 Holdings, a Nevada corporation (the “Maker”) promised to pay to C. Stephen Cochennet, or its registered assigns or successors in interest (the “Holder”) the Principal Amount and Interest (both as defined below) in the manner and upon the terms and conditions as set forth in that Term Note (“Note”) in the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), dated September 18, 2013, which Note becomes due and payable on or about April 30, 2014.







By execution by the parties herein, this Promissory Note Extension Agreement extends the Maturity Date of the Note to and including July 15, 2014. All terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same other than the Maturity Date.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Holder have caused this Promissory Note Extension Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.







“Maker”


Guardian 8 Holdings


a Nevada corporation

















By: /s/ Kathleen Hanrahan                                                              


                                                                       Kathleen Hanrahan, Chief Financial Officer







“Holder”






















/s/ C. Stephen Cochennet                                                               


C. Stephen Cochennet
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby
certifies that the Form 10-K Annual Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                                             
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ GARY L. CARANO                                                                                          
|                      |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended February 29, 2008 (the "Report") by PaperFree Medical Solutions,
Inc., the undersigned hereby certifies that:
 
 1. The
Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
  Date:
      July 21, 2008
                        By:
      /s/ Michael
      J. GelmonName:
      Michael J. GelmonTitle:
      CEO &
CFO
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6198

EDWARD LEE BOONE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00510-REP)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Lee Boone, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Lee Boone seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying as second or successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Boone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,085
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,062
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                22,344
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            15,915
<LOANS>                                         78,927
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,069
<DEPOSITS>                                     114,649
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                543
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 129,069
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,375
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  806
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   459
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,640
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,448
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,448
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,192
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,008
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,008
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.55
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,228
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,129
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,467
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       72
<RECOVERIES>                                       190
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,585
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald R. Cysewski,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
| 1)     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act (15  U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2)     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.     |

 

 
| Date:  | November 14, 2005 |                                     | /s/ Gerald R. Cysewski |   |
|--------|------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|   |                   | Gerald R. Cysewski,                      |                   |
|   |                   | *Chairman of the Board of  Directors,*   |                   |
|   |                   | *President and Chief Executive  Officer* |                   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                                October 4, 2000


InterTAN, Inc.
3300 Highway #7, Suite 904
Concord, Ontario, Canada L4K 4M3

   Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   We have acted as counsel for InterTAN, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), of an aggregate of 200,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share (the "Shares"), for
issuance under the InterTAN, Inc.  Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the "Plan").

   We have participated in the preparation of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") covering the issuance and
sale of Shares, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, relating to
the registration of the Shares under the Securities Act.

   In connection with the foregoing, we have examined the originals or copies,
certified or otherwise authenticated to our satisfaction, of the resolutions of
the Company's Board of Directors establishing the Plan, the Registration
Statement and such corporate records of the Company, certificates of officers of
the Company, and other instruments and documents as we have deemed necessary to
require as a basis for the opinion hereinafter expressed.  As to various
questions of fact material to such opinion, we have, where relevant facts were
not independently established, relied upon statements of officers of the Company
whom we believe to be responsible.

   Based upon the foregoing and in reliance thereon, we advise you that in our
opinion the Shares, when issued and delivered in accordance with the provisions
of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

   We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.


                                         Respectfully submitted,



                                         THOMPSON & KNIGHT L.L.P.



                                         By:/s/ ANN MARIE COWDREY
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Ann Marie Cowdrey, Partner
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: March 6, 2008Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables |
Historical dataCurrent release | Screen reader | PDF (656 KB) | Data Download Program (DDP)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Z.1 Release                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|Complete file      PDF (656 KB)


Summary statistics and table of contents      PDF (87 KB) | CSV (9 KB)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables      PDF (12 KB) | CSV (6 KB)
Flows tables      PDF (182 KB) | CSV (123 KB)
Level tables      PDF (150 KB) | CSV (107 KB)
Balance sheet tables      PDF(24 KB) | CSV (13 KB)
Supplementary tables      PDF (36 KB) | CSV (23 KB)These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web SiteRelease dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables |
Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | PDF (656 KB) | Data Download Program (DDP)


Statistical releasesHome |
Economic research and dataAccessibility | 
Contact Us
Last update: March 6, 2008
|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                       AGREEMENT DATED AS OF APRIL 26, 2002


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-5


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2002-5, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                       BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv D35