Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Notices 51979 

1See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven 

Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Postponement of Final 

Determination, 75 FR 7244 (February 18, 2010) 

(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

2See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Sodium Hexametaphosphate From the 

People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 6479, 6481 

(February 4, 2008), quoting SAA at 870. 

3See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered 

Roller Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside 

Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan; 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of 

Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 

(November 6, 1996), unchanged in Tapered Roller 

Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 

Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered Roller 

Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, 

and Components Thereof, From Japan; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Termination in Part, 62 FR 11825 

(March 13, 1997). 

4See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven 

Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China and 

Taiwan: Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

Investigations, 74 FR 39291 (August 6, 2009) 

(‘‘Initiation Notice’’) 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk 

Officer, FAX number (202) 395–7285, or 

David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov. 

Dated: August 19, 2010. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20944 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–952] 

Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven 

Selvedge from the People’s Republic 

of China: Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karine Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4081. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Amendment to the Final Determination 

In accordance with sections 735(d) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, (‘‘the Act’’), on July 19, 

2010, the Department of Commerce ( 

‘‘the Department’’) published the final 

determination of sales at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the antidumping 

investigation of narrow woven ribbons 

with woven selvedge (‘‘narrow woven 

ribbons’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). See Narrow Woven 

Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 75 FR 41808 (July 19, 2010) 

(‘‘Final Determination’’). 

On July 19, 2010, Ningbo MH 

Industry Co. Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo MH’’) filed a 

timely allegation that the Department 

made a ministerial error in the Final 

Determination, specifically, that the 

Department misidentified its producer. 

Ningbo MH thus requested, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.224, that the Department 

amend the Final Determination with the 

correct name of its producer. 

Additionally, on July 20, 2010, 

Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Bestpak’’) filed a timely allegation 

that the Department made a ministerial 

error in the Final Determination, 

specifically, that the Department 

misidentified the PRC–wide rate used in 

calculating the separate rate. Ningbo 

MH thus requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.224, that the Department correct the 

alleged ministerial error by recalculating 

the separate rate. No other parties in this 

proceeding submitted comments on the 

Department’s final margin calculations. 

A ministerial error is defined as an 

error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

type of unintentional error which the 

Department considers ministerial.’’ See 

section 735(e) of the Act; see also 19 

CFR 351.224(f). 

After analyzing Bestpak’s comments, 

we have determined, in accordance with 

section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.224(e), that we made an inadvertent 

ministerial error by inaccurately listing 

the PRC–wide entity rate used in the 

Department’s Preliminary 

Determination.1 However, the 

appropriate correction for this error is to 

amend the Corroboration section of the 

Final Determination, as detailed below, 

not recalculation of the separate rate. 

For a detailed discussion of this 

ministerial error, see Memorandum to 

Edward C. Yang, Acting Deputy 

Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

through Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, 

concerning, ‘‘Ministerial Errors 

Memorandum, Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value: Narrow Woven Ribbons with 

Woven Selvedge from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated August 12, 

2010 (‘‘Ministerial Error Memo’’). 

Additionally, after analyzing Ningbo 

MH’s comments, we have determined, 

in accordance with section 735(e) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), that we did 

not make a ministerial error with 

respect to Ningbo MH’s producer’s 

name. For a detailed discussion of our 

analysis, see Ministerial Error Memo. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

735(e) of the Act, we are amending the 

final determination of sales at LTFV in 

the antidumping duty investigation of 

narrow woven ribbons from the PRC. 

After correcting this ministerial error, 

the final text of the Final Determination 

Corroboration section should read as 

follows: 

Section 776(c) of the Act provides 

that, when the Department relies on 

secondary information rather than 

on information obtained in the 

course of an investigation as facts 

available, it must, to the extent 

practicable, corroborate that 

information from independent 

sources reasonably at its disposal. 

Secondary information is described 

as ‘‘information derived from the 

petition that gave rise to the 

investigation or review, the final 

determination concerning 

merchandise subject to this 

investigation, or any previous 

review under section 751 

concerning the merchandise subject 

to this investigation.’’2 To 

‘‘corroborate’’ means that the 

Department will satisfy itself that 

the secondary information to be 

used has probative value. 

Independent sources used to 

corroborate may include, for 

example, published price lists, 

official import statistics and 

customs data, and information 

obtained from interested parties 

during the particular investigation. 

To corroborate secondary 

information, the Department will, to 

the extent practicable, examine the 

reliability and relevance of the 

information used.3

The adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) 

rate that the Department used is drawn 

from the petition, as adjusted to reflect 

the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’)’s decision 

in Dorbest. See Final Determination, 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 1. Petitioner’s methodology 

for calculating the U.S. price and 

normal value (‘‘NV’’) in the petition is 

discussed in the Initiation Notice.4 In 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
51980 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Notices 

5See Preliminary Determination, 75 FR at 7251. 

6See Final Determination, Issues and Decisions 

Memorandum at Comment 1. See also July 12, 2010 

Memorandum to the File from Karine Gziryan, 

International Trade Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, ‘‘Antidumping Investigation of Narrow 

Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the 

People’s Republic of China: Proprietary 

Memorandum regarding Corroboration’’. 

7See Final Analysis Memorandum for Yama 

Ribbons and Bows Co. Ltd., dated July 12, 2010. 

8See Final Determination, Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 12; see also July 12, 

2010 Memorandum to the File from Karine Gziryan, 

International Trade Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, ‘‘Antidumping Investigation of Narrow 

Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the 

People’s Republic of China: Proprietary 

Memorandum regarding Corroboration’’. 

the Preliminary Determination, we 

assigned to the PRC–wide entity the 

margin alleged in the petition, i.e., 

231.40 percent.5 For the final 

determination, we have assigned to the 

PRC–wide entity the rate of 247.65 

percent.6 To corroborate the AFA 

margin that we have selected, we 

compared it to the model–specific 

margins we found for the participating 

mandatory respondent, Yama. We found 

that the margin of 247.65 percent has 

probative value because it is in the 

range of Yama’s model–specific 

margins.7 Accordingly, we find that the 

rate of 247.65 percent is corroborated 

within the meaning of section 776(c) of 

the Act.8

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation: 

In accordance with section 

735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department 

has instructed U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to continue to 

suspend liquidation of all entries of 

narrow woven ribbons from the PRC, as 

described in the ‘‘Scope of Investigation’’ 

section, entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after, 

February 18, 2010, the date of 

publication of the Preliminary 

Determination in the Federal Register. 

See Preliminary Determination. The 

Department has instructed CBP to 

require a cash deposit or the posting of 

a bond equal to the weighted–average 

dumping margin amount by which the 

normal value exceeds U.S. price. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.224(e). 

Dated: August 17, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21042 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 84–21A12] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of Issuance of an 

amended Export Trade Certificate of 

Review to Northwest Fruit Exporters 

(‘‘NFE’’) (Application #84–21A12). 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce issued an amended Export 

Trade Certificate of Review to 

Northwest Fruit Exporters on August 18, 

2010. The Certificate has been amended 

eleven times. The previous amendment 

was issued to NFE on September 16, 

2009, and a notice of its issuance was 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 23, 2009 (74 FR 48250). The 

original Certificate for NFE was issued 

on June 11, 1984, and a notice of its 

issuance was published in the Federal 

Register on June 14, 1984 (74 FR 48520). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph E. Flynn, Director, Office of 

Competition and Economic Analysis, 

International Trade Administration, by 

telephone at (202) 482–5131 (this is not 

a toll-free number) or e-mail at 

etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. The 

regulations implementing Title III are 

found at 15 CFR part 325 (2010). 

The Office of Competition and 

Economic Analysis (‘‘OCEA’’) is issuing 

this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), 

which requires the Secretary of 

Commerce to publish a summary of the 

certification in the Federal Register. 

Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15 

CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by 

the Secretary’s determination may, 

within 30 days of the date of this notice, 

bring an action in any appropriate 

district court of the United States to set 

aside the determination on the ground 

that the determination is erroneous. 

Description of Amended Certificate 

NFE’s Export Trade Certificate of 

Review has Been Amended To 

1. Add the following new Members of 

the Certificate within the meaning of 

section 325.2(1) of the Regulations (15 

CFR 325.2(1)): Hood River Cherry 

Company (Hood River, OR), Ice Lakes 

LLS (E. Wenatchee, WA), and JackAss 

Mt. Ranch (Pasco, WA) and; 

2. Delete the following Members from 

NFE’s Certificate: Poirier Warehouse 

(Pateros, WA) and Witte Orchards (E. 

Wenatchee, WA). 

Dated: August 19, 2010. 

Joseph E. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Competition and Economic 

Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20971 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–891] 

Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China; 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Hoefke or Fred Baker, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4947 or (202) 482– 

2924, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 29, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

initiation of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on hand trucks 

and certain parts thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China, covering the 

period of December 1, 2008, to 

November 30, 2009. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, and Deferral of 

Initiation of Administrative Review, 75 

FR 4770 (January 29, 2010). The current 

deadline for the preliminary results of 

this review is September 9, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

that the Department complete the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. However, 

if it is not practicable to complete the 

review within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1