alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report of Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2007, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David F. Brussard, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|                                                                                                                                 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                                                 |  | 
|/s/DAVID F. BRUSSARDDavid F. Brussard President, Chief
Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|                                                                                                                                 |  | 
|March 14, 2008                                                                                                                   |  | 

---



QuickLinks
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 

THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN REDACTED AND IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUEST PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2. REDACTED MATERIAL IS MARKED WITH [***] AND HAS 

BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

CELLULOSE SPECIALTIES AGREEMENT 
 THIS
AMENDMENT is effective as of January 1, 2012, and is entered into by and between Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co., Ltd. (“Buyer”), and Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC (“Seller”), collectively, the “Parties.” 

WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller entered into a Cellulose Specialties Agreement with an effective date of January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”);

 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to revise the parties respective purchase and sales volumes obligations; 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to revise certain business terms in the Agreement. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Replace Article 3(a) in its entirety with the following: 

 (a) Buyer shall purchase and Rayonier
shall sell the following annual quantities: 
 2012 *** 

2013 *** 
 2014 *** 

Except as amended above, all remaining provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and year first above written. 

 
  

									
	NANTONG CELLULOSE FIBERS CO., LTD.	 		 	RAYONIER PERFORMANCE FIBERS, LLC
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Mao Jun        
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Erin Byers        

	Name:	 	Mao Jun	 		 	Name:	 	Erin Byers
	Title:	 	Deputy Gen. Mgr. Administration	 		 	Title:	 	VP Sales Market Research
	Date:	 	11/1/11	 		 	Date:	 	11/1/11
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                         Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800  Houston, TX  77002-5218              Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2000 for Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1983-1 Limited Partnership.



                                    //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.






Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 188 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.188

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
   To revise the short title of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and 
Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act 
                                of 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    Section 1 of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott 
King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 
(Public Law 109-246) is amended by striking ``and Coretta Scott King'' 
and inserting ``Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. Jordan, 
William C. Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia''.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    Paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 4(a), and section 13(a)(1), of 
the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973b(a), 1973k(a)(1)) are 
each amended by striking ``and Coretta Scott King'' and inserting 
``Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. Jordan, William C. 
Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia''.

SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION.

    Title I of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``Sec. 20.  A reference in this title to the effective date of the 
amendments made by, or the date of the enactment of, the Fannie Lou 
Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. 
Jordan, William C. Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia Voting Rights 
Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 shall be considered to 
refer to, respectively, the effective date of the amendments made by, 
or the date of the enactment of, the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and 
Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act 
of 2006.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JOHN MAJEED, a/k/a Isaac Abram Abraham,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:00-cr-00204-WO-4)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas John Majeed, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas John Majeed appeals a district court order 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question 

did not lower Majeed’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district 

did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United 

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating 

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We deny Majeed’s motion for a stay pending

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 for Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768172
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         7,866
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,046
<PP&E>                                         655,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 545,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     80,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,795
<SALES>                                        19,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,470
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (957)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.31)
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         137,000
<SECURITIES>                                     5,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,576,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   202,934
<INVENTORY>                                  4,082,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,004,000
<PP&E>                                       4,898,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,717,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,370,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,514,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,000
<COMMON>                                        37,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,805,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,370,000
<SALES>                                      4,336,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,336,000
<CGS>                                        3,093,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,093,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,362,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12279 and #12280]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated 08/14/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2010 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         08/16/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/13/2010.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/16/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

      ( print page 52049)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Iowa, dated 08/14/2010 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties:*                     (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Jasper, Mahaska, Polk.                

*Contiguous Counties:*                     (Economic Injury Loans Only): Iowa, Keokuk, Poweshiek, Wapello.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Lisa Lopez-Suarez,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-20965 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61068-61072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24405]



[[Page 61068]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-70]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-70 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 7, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 61069]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15OC08.038


[[Page 61070]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15OC08.039


[[Page 61071]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15OC08.040


[[Page 61072]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15OC08.041

[FR Doc. E8-24405 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 19, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.100.a Nonprofit Organizations1** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 23.2

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Private Label Corporation 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-138404 and No. 333-138404-01) on Form S-3 of HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I of our attestation report dated March 3, 2008 with respect to HSBC Private Label Corporation’s (the Company) assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), and 1122(d)(4)(xiv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation ABapplicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by private label credit card receivables, as of and for the period from February 14, 2007 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) through December 31, 2007. Management has determined that all othercriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities with respect to HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I relating to those criteria.  Our attestation report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of HSBC Private Label Card Master Note Trust (USA) I.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 24, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph F. Fisher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.

Date: March 15, 2005        /s/  JOSEPH F. FISHER
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Joseph F. Fisher
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                       -1-
#### CONTINENTAL ASSOCIATES v. MILLER.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Income RealEstate, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executiveofficer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of thechief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### John BRIONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44312.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1971.

Willis E. Gresham, Jr., Lamesa, for appellant.

Vernon D. Adcock, Dist. Atty., Lamesa, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*40OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from an order revoking probation.

On March 26, 1970, appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of driving while intoxicated, subsequent offense, and his punishment was assessed at two years in the Department of Corrections. Imposition of sentence was suspended and probation was granted, one of the conditions being that he commit no offense against the laws of this or any other state, or of the United States.

On September 16, 1970, following a hearing on motion to revoke probation, an order was entered finding that appellant had violated the terms and conditions of his probation by driving and operating an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; making an assault upon Lupe Flores; and, passing a worthless check. On the same day, sentence was pronounced and notice of appeal given.

The sufficiency of the evidence to revoke probation is not challenged. The only question presented to this court is whether the order placing appellant on probation was valid. Appellant contends that the judgment is void since the county court judgment allegedly convicting the appellant of the first offense assessed only a fine and did not assess the mandatory jail time.1

On appeal from an order of the court revoking probation, review is limited to a determination of whether an abuse of discretion is shown by the trial court in revoking the probation. Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 449 S.W.2d 234; Wilkerson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 395 S.W.2d 618.

Irregularities in the record may, in a proper proceeding, be corrected nunc pro tunc. Martin v. State, supra; Barker v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 277, 334 S.W.2d 182; Lenore v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 417, 129 S.W.2d 657. See also Hoskins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 425 S.W.2d 825.

We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in revoking probation.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The said judgment assessed a fine of $50.00 and “-days in the County Jail.’