alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Reliv’ International, Inc.
        (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert
        L. Montgomery, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D.
        Albright, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
                  Robert L. MontgomeryRobert L. Montgomery
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer
 Date:
        November 7, 2008
  /s/
                Steven D. AlbrightSteven
                    D. Albright
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
 
 Date:
        November 7, 2008
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        and
        is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
        document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        as
        amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
        section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
        into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
        Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically
        incorporated by reference in any such filing.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.8(b)



 EXHIBIT 10.8(b) 

Ceres Managed Futures LLC 
 522 Fifth Ave, 14th Floor 
 New York, New York 10036 

March 28, 2014 
 Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated 
 777 E. Wisconsin Avenue 
 Milwaukee, WI 53202

 Attention: Dayna M. Kleinman 
  

	Re:	Reduction in Selling Agent Fee 

 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to paragraph 10(d) of the Placement Agent Agreement and paragraph 2(d) of the Services Agreement, each dated January 6, 2011,
between, among others, Managed Futures Premier Warrington L.P. (formerly, Warrington Fund L.P.) (the “Fund”) and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (the “Placement Agent”), Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the Fund’s
general partner, is hereby notifying the Placement Agent that the monthly ongoing selling agent fee (the “Selling Agent Fee”) will be reduced (the “Notice”). 

Effective April 1, 2014, the Selling Agent Fee paid by the Fund to Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, currently doing business as Morgan
Stanley Wealth Management, will be reduced for (i) Class A unit holders from an annual rate of 3.75% to an annual rate of 2.50% of the adjusted net assets of Class A units and (ii) Class D unit holders from an annual rate of
1.50% to an annual rate of 1.25% of the adjusted net assets of Class D units. 
 Furthermore, effective April 1, 2014, any upfront fee
paid to the Placement Agent attributable to units sold by the Placement Agent will also be reduced to a rate of 2.00% of the subscription amount of the limited partnership interests to which it applies (the “Upfront Fee Notice” and,
together with the Selling Agent Fee Notice, the “Notices”). 
 By signing below the Placement Agent hereby acknowledges and
accepts receipt of the Notices and agrees to the terms herein. 







 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our discussions, kindly sign and
return to us a counterpart hereof (by mail, facsimile or email) as soon as possible. 
  

					
	Sincerely,	 	
		
		 	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alper Daglioglu

		 	Name:	 	Alper Daglioglu
		 	Title:	 	President and Director
		
		 	MANAGED FUTURES PREMIER WARRINGTON L.P.
		
		 	By: Ceres Managed Futures LLC, its general partner
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alper Daglioglu

		 	Name:	 	Alper Daglioglu
		 	Title:	 	President and Director


  

			
	Agreed to, acknowledged and accepted:
	
	ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dayna Kleinman

	Name:	 	Dayna Kleinman
	Title:	 	FVP – Sr. Product Manager
Exhibit 10.11
 Amendment #1 To The
Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.
 Employment Agreement
 THIS AMENDMENT
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows:
 Expenses.
 2.
    
    Section 7(d) of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows:
 Conferences and Continuing Education




---



##### 



3.
    
    Section 10(b) of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows:
 Termination of Employment by the Board of Directors Without Cause
 4.
    
    Section 10(e)(i) of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows:
  5.
    
    A new Section 20 is added to the Agreement to provide as follows:
 Compliance with Section 409A
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 MONARCH COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
    
    
    
    EXECUTIVEBy:
    
    /s/ Stephen M. Ross
    
    
    
    /s/ Donald L. DenneyStephen M. Ross
    
    
    
    DONALD L. DENNEYIts:
    
    Chairman
 Witness:
    
    /s/ Andrew J. Van Doren
 3
---

Exhibit 32.1

U.S.GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel J. Kunz, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Geothermal
  Inc. (the “Company”) certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB
        for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 (“report”), which
        this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                       

|Date: July 12,
      2005                    | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|                                             | 
|                                             | 
|                                             | 
|/s/
      Daniel J. Kunz                     | 
|Daniel J. Kunz
      Chief Executive Officer | 

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,650
<SECURITIES>                                   283,841
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,863,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               570,613
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,741,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          639,550
<BONDS>                                      9,863,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       184,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,741,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               594,244
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               594,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    125
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       100
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1888 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War Veterans 

Armistice Day to the list of days on which the flag should especially 

be displayed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2007 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National 

Korean War Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days 

on which the flag should especially be displayed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Korean War Veterans 

5 Recognition Act of 2007’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 1888 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VET2 ERANS ARMISTICE DAY. 

3 Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amend4 ed by inserting ‘‘National Korean War Veterans Armistice 

5 Day, July 27;’’ after ‘‘July 4;’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### Herman J. Goldwyn, Doing Business as Crown Royal Company, Plaintiff, *v.*George W. Warnecke & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 30, 1956.

*Daniel F. Cohalan*for plaintiff.

*Bernard E. Goldstein*and *Edward L. Sadowshy*for defendant.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

In his complaint, plaintiff alleges in substance: that the parties were brokers; that, under a copartnership agreement between them, they were to divide any commissions received from their customer upon their procuring a mortgage loan for him; that the loan was obtained; that defendant received the entire commission; and that it refused to divide with plaintiff. The complaint seeks $11,000, which is one half of the commissions.

Defendant moves to strike the action from the jury calendar on the ground that plaintiff is suing on a partnership account and is therefore entitled to equitable relief only. If this is so, the plaintiff can not have a jury trial as a matter of right, and the action should be stricken from the jury calendar.

*634By cross motion plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint so as to eliminate the allegation of partnership. He takes the position that, by deleting the words “ as copartners ”, he removes any doubt that the action is not an equitable one, and that he clearly leaves merely an action for money damages. This position is not well taken. The complaint, when amended, would still plead an equitable cause of action. The pleading would then allege what amounts to a joint venture between the parties to secure a mortgage loan and to divide the proceeds from the obtaining of the loan on the basis of a one-half share of the net profit to plaintiff and a one-half share to defendant. An action which seeks to obtain a share of the yield of a joint venture is an equitable action *(Wainwright & Page*v. *Burr & McAuley,*272 N. Y. 130) and is thus triable without a jury.

The cross motion to amend the complaint is granted without opposition, and, upon the amended as well as the original complaint, the motion to strike from the jury calendar is granted.

Settle one order on both motions.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1877 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to prescribe that 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans out of uniform may render the military salute during hoisting, 

lowering, or passing of flag. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

S 1877 RFH

1 SECTION 1. CONDUCT BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

2 FORCES AND VETERANS OUT OF UNIFORM 

3 DURING HOISTING, LOWERING, OR PASSING 

4 OF FLAG. 

5 Section 9 of title 4, United States Code, is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘all persons present’’ and all that follows 

7 through the end and inserting ‘‘those present in uniform 

8 should render the military salute. Members of the Armed 

9 Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform 

10 may render the military salute. All other persons present 

11 should face the flag and stand at attention with their right 

12 hand over the heart, or if applicable, remove their head13 dress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, 

14 the hand being over the heart. Citizens of other countries 

15 should stand at attention. All such conduct toward the flag 

16 in a moving column should be rendered at the moment 

17 the flag passes.’’. 

Passed the Senate July 25, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.01



I, Mario Sbarro, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sbarro, Inc.

     2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  Report  does not  contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Quarterly Report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included in this Quarterly  Report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

Date:  November 20, 2002



/s/ Mario Sbarro
-----------------------------------
Mario Sbarro
Chairman of the Board and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov*.                

*Agreement No.:*                     011426-042.                

*Title:*                     West Coast of South America Discussion Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     APL Co. Pte Ltd.; Compania Chilena de Navigacion Interoceanica, S.A.; Compania Sud Americana de Vapores, S.A.; Frontier Liner Services, Inc.; Hamburg-Süd; King Ocean Services Limited, Inc.; Maruba S.C.A.; Seaboard Marine Ltd.; South Pacific Shipping Company, Ltd.; and Trinity Shipping Line.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment removes Mediterranean Shipping Company SA as a party to the agreement.                

Dated: October 10, 2008.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-24622 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
NO. 07-06-0311-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	AUGUST 15, 2006

	______________________________

	PEDRO SANTILLANO,

									Appellant

	V.

	PAT I. MARTIN,

									Appellee		 									_________________________________

	FROM THE 285th DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY;

	NO. 2004-CI-18165; HONORABLE MARTHA TANNER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Pedro Santillano, appellant, appealed from a final judgment of the trial court.  We dismiss the appeal.

	The clerk’s record was filed with this court on June 26, 2006, and the reporter’s record was filed on June 7, 2006.  Appellant’s brief, therefore, was due on July 26, 2006.  By letter dated August 2, 2006, we notified appellant that the due date for the brief had passed, that the brief had not been filed and that no motion for extension of time to file the brief had been received by the court.  Citing Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8, we also informed appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief was filed by August 14, 2006.  To date, appellant has filed neither a response to the court’s August 2nd letter, a brief nor a motion requesting an extension of the lapsed deadline.   

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

							Brian Quinn

						          Chief Justice
#### KENTUCKY STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Richard L. MacKAY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 17, 1974.

Henry H. Harned, Leslie G. Whitmer, Kentucky State Bar Assn., Frankfort, for complainant.

Richard MacKay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent.

John C. Ryan, Frankfort, Warning Order Attorney.

PER CURIAM

Opinion, Ordering Suspension from the Practice of Law Until Further Order.*
#### Lya Crolla GLASER, Appellant, v. Dewey Everett GLASER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 17, 1974.

James C. Ludwig, Louisville, for appellant.

Daniel B. Boone, Boone & Zoeller, Louisville, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice MILLIKEN,

Affirming in part, Reversing in part.*
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2009*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.209 Treasury Securities** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Erin Robert RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. Robert M. SHORT, Judge, Daviess Circuit Court, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 17, 1974.

John D. Miller, Miller & Taylor, Owens-boro, for appellant.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice JONES,

Denying Prohibition and Mandamus.*
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2009*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.212 Corporate and Foreign Bonds** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order filed April 28, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00780-CR

____________

NORMA JEAN SANCHEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1399973

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire 

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 351st District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before May 7, 2015; that the 
clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to 

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days 

of that date.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2 U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATIONS In connection with the report of U.S. Geothermal Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kerry D. Hawkley, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the business issuer. Date: June 15, 2009 /s/ Kerry D. Hawkley___
Kerry D. Hawkley 
Chief Financial Officer


---