alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-04-1998
<CASH>                                          120805
<SECURITIES>                                      5000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3887
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       2572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                138289
<PP&E>                                          300020
<DEPRECIATION>                                  161329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  283109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            30590
<BONDS>                                             00
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                      241633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    283109
<SALES>                                         256708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                266634
<CGS>                                            54068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   122229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  32497
<INCOME-TAX>                                     12349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    822
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
               MMI Companies, Inc and Subsidiaries
   Exhibit 11 - Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
              (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                              Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                September 30,       September 30,
                              1997       1996     1997       1996
<S>                           <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>
PRIMARY                                                     
                                                            
Weighted average shares   
outstanding.................  11,683     10,030   11,680     9,871
Net effect of dilutive stock                                
options based  on the 
treasury stock method using 
average  market price.......     265        464      308       432
                                                            
Weighted  average number  of                                
common and common
equivalent shares...........  11,948     10,494   11,988    10,303
                                  
Net income.................. $ 7,643   $  6,176 $ 21,163  $ 19,935
                                                            
Earnings per common and                                             
common equivalent    
share....................... $   .64   $    .59 $   1.77  $   1.93
                                                            
FULLY DILUTED                                               
                                                            
Weighted average shares 
outstanding.................  11,683     10,030   11,680    9,871
                                                            
Net effect of dilutive stock                                        
options based on the 
treasury stock method using     
ending market price, if
higher than average.........     323        464      343      463
Weighted average number of                                
common and common equivalent  
shares.....................   12,006     10,494   12,023   10,344
                                                            
Net income................. $  7,643   $  6,176  $21,163  $19,935
                                                            
Earnings per common and                                     
common equivalent   
share...................... $    .64   $    .59  $  1.76   $ 1.93
                                                            
</TABLE>
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

City of Bethlehem and the :

United States of America :

:

v. : No. 181 C.D. 2017

:

Alvin S. Kanofsky, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

NOW, January 16, 2018, having considered appellant’s application for 

reconsideration, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, United States Circuit Judge for the **

Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s

request for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY EARL EVANS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15070

D.C. No. 1:06-cv-01250-ALA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Arthur L. Alarcón, Circuit Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted May 25, 2010*** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Johnny Earl Evans, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

FILED

JUN 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-15070

district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging violations of his First and Eighth Amendment rights. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion,

Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 452 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir. 2006), and

we affirm.

In his motion for reconsideration, Evans repeated the arguments raised in his

oppositions to the motion to dismiss: that both his grievance and citizen’s

complaint satisfied the administrative exhaustion requirement or, in the alternative,

that he was excused from compliance with the exhaustion requirement. The

district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion for reconsideration

because Evans failed to establish “manifest injustice” to warrant relief from

judgment. Id. at 1103 (explaining that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) “is

used sparingly as an equitable remedy to prevent manifest injustice” (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted)).

Evans’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
#### Otis Leon POWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44579.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1972.

Neal Wheeler, Dallas (Court appointed), for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., John B. Tolle, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and Jim D. Vol-lers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction was for burglary with the intent to commit theft. Two prior convictions for burglary were alleged to enhance the punishment under the provisions of Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, life imprisonment.

The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged.

When two city of Dallas police officers arrived at the scene of the burglary at approximately 11:00 p. m., they found a window broken on the side of the building housing a motor company. The officers entered the building; inside they found several offices constructed of wood waist-high, with glass above the wood reaching to the ceiling. Several of the glass panels had been broken and there was broken glass on the floor. After a search, the officers found the appellant in one of the offices, crouched under the cashier’s desk, holding a tow chain in his hand. The cash drawer had been pried open. There was a *935screwdriver on the floor and the appellant had a putty knife in his pocket.

Under a number of decisions of this court, the act of breaking and entering a house in the nighttime raises a presumption that it was done with the intent to steal. Sikes v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 257, 312 S.W.2d 524 (Tex.Cr.App.1958); Roberts v. State 375 S.W.2d 303 (Tex.Cr.App.1964); Bonner v. State, 375 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.Cr.App.1964); Briones v. State, 363 S.W.2d 466 (Tex.Cr.App.1963).

The complaining witness testified that he did not give consent or authority for the appellant to enter the building.

The appellant testified that he did not burglarize the building. He said he was arrested about two blocks from the building, then taken to the building by the officers and thereafter charged with the offense of burglary. The appellant admitted the two prior convictions as alleged as well as another burglary conviction. The State proved the prior alleged convictions by use of a prison packet containing the fingerprints and photograph of the appellant and the judgment and sentence of each prior conviction alleged.

A jury heard the testimony and resolved the fact issues against the appellant. The evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict.

The appellant’s second ground of error complains “The prosecutor refer (ed) to appellant as an ‘idiot’ and infer (ed) he was a liar, by misquoting the record during closing argument.” Only a general objection was made. The prosecutor apologized for his argument. The appellant did not request a ruling by the court and no ruling was made by the court. The appellant did not move the court to instruct the jury not to consider the argument and no further relief was requested by appellant. No error is shown. Thurmond v. State, 445 S.W.2d 525 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Hughes v. State, 433 S.W.2d 698 (Tex.Cr.App.1968).

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Public notice.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2013.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Chief, Commercial Services Program, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW., 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, Telephone 202/513-7156.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service proposes to extend the following concession contract for a period of two years through December 31, 2014.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listed concession authorization will expire by its terms on December 31, 2012. The National Park Service has determined that the proposed short-term extension is necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption. Conc ID No.
Concessioner name
ParkDENA001-03
Doyon/ARAMARK Denali National Park Concession Joint Venture
Denali National Park.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Chief, Commercial Services Program, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW., 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, Telephone 202/513-7156. Dated: July 26, 2010. Heidi M. Ernst, Acting Associate Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. 2010-21038 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           657,520
<SECURITIES>                                   1,996,035
<RECEIVABLES>                                    854,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (98,235)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,861,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,823,370
<PP&E>                                         1,027,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (572,955)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,018,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            399,959
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       18,717
<COMMON>                                          18,273
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,515,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,018,439
<SALES>                                        1,713,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,791,269
<CGS>                                            933,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,181,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (236,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     222,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (458,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (458,833)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.25)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Keith C. Robbins, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Community Valley Bancorp;

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annualreport whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
| Date: March 8, 2007 |   | By:                                                  | /s/ Keith C. Robbins |   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|                |   |                                                 |
|                |   | Keith C. Robbins, President, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4 
 Amendment Number 3 
 to 

PCS U.S. Employees’ Savings Plan for Collectively Bargained Employees 

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2012) 
 WHEREAS, PCS Administration (USA), Inc, (“Sponsor”) is the sponsor of the PCS U.S. Employees’ Savings Plan for Collectively Bargained Employees (“Plan”), a qualified
defined contribution plan maintained pursuant to Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; 

WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan in order to implement certain terms of the 2013 White Springs Agricultural
Chemicals, Inc. Involuntary Severance Pay Plan for Union Employees; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 14 of the Plan,
the Sponsor may amend the Plan at any time and has authorized the undersigned officer to execute this Amendment. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, effective as of the execution date of this Amendment, the Plan is amended by adding the following new Supplement D to the Plan: 
 “Supplement D. 2013 White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. Involuntary Severance Pay Plan for Union Employees 
 D.1 Covered Participants. A participant in this Supplement (a “Supplement D Participant”) is a Plan Participant employed by White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. who (i) is
notified of his or her involuntary termination and eligibility to participate in the 2013 White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. Involuntary Severance Pay Plan for Union Employees (the “2013 Involuntary Severance Plan”); and
(ii) executes and does not later revoke a waiver and release agreement under the 2013 Involuntary Severance Plan. The determination of who is eligible to be a Supplement D Participant shall be made in the sole discretion of the Plan
Administrator. 
 D.2 Vesting. Any Supplement D Participant who is not 100% fully vested in his Plan Accounts will become
100% fully vested upon termination of employment. 
 D.3 Compensation. Any severance pay or additional compensation paid
to a Supplement D Participant under the 2013 Involuntary Severance Plan shall not be Compensation for the purpose of determining any type of contributions or benefits under the Plan. This Section shall not apply to any notice pay received by a
Supplement D Participant pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN).” 

*        *        * 

[signature page to follow] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has caused this Amendment to be executed on its
behalf by its duly authorized officer effective as of the 2 day of December, 2013. 
  

			
	PCS Administration (USA), Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lee Knafelc

		 	Lee Knafelc
		 	V.P., Human Resources & Administrator



  
 2
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1922 

To apply basic contracting laws to the Transportation Security 

Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To apply basic contracting laws to the Transportation 

Security Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Acquisition Re5 form Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 114 of title 49, United 

8 States Code, is amended by repealing subsection (o). 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

S 1922 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

3 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

EXECUTION VERSION 

ASSUMPTION AND ACCESSION AGREEMENT 
 Date:
May 20, 2014 
  

	To:	Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement dated as of September 21, 2012 (as previously amended, the “Credit Agreement”) among Pentair Finance S.A., various
affiliates thereof, various financial institutions and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 

 Ladies/Gentlemen: 

As contemplated by the First Amendment and Consent, dated as of April 22, 2014 to the Credit Agreement, upon the Merger, each of Pentair plc and the Swiss
Parent are to be parties to the Credit Agreement. Accordingly, each of Pentair plc and the Swiss Parent acknowledges and agrees as follows: 

1. Pentair plc acknowledges that, effective upon the Merger, it will become a party to the Credit Agreement. In furtherance of the foregoing,
Pentair plc agrees that, effective upon the Merger, (a) it will have assumed all obligations of Pentair Ltd. under the Credit Agreement and (b) it will perform all of the obligations of the “Parent” under the Credit Agreement.
Without limiting the foregoing, Pentair plc confirms that, upon the effectiveness of the Merger, its guaranty of the obligations of each Borrower set forth in Article X of the Credit Agreement will be effective. 

2. Effective upon the Merger, the Swiss Parent will become a party to the Credit Agreement. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Swiss Parent
agrees that, effective upon the Merger, (a) it will be bound by the Credit Agreement in all respects as if it had been an original party thereto and (b) it will perform all of the obligations of a “Guarantor” under the Credit
Agreement. 
 [Signatures begin on the following page] 








									
	PENTAIR plc	 		 	PENTAIR INVESTMENTS SWITZERLAND GmbH
					
	By:	 	/s/ Angela D. Lageson	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Mark C. Borin
	Name: Angela D. Lageson	 		 	Name: Mark C. Borin
	Title: Director	 		 	Title: Managing Director
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Julien Lugon-Moulin
		 		 		 	Name: Julien Lugon-Moulin
		 		 		 	Title: Managing Director

 Assumption and Accession Agreement