alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





_______________________________________





FORM 8-K





_______________________________________





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 24, 2018





_______________________________________





Kforce Inc.


Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter





_______________________________________





Florida000-2605859-3264661State or other jurisdiction of incorporationCommission File NumberIRS Employer Identification No.





1001 East Palm Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33605


Address of principal executive offices  Zip Code





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (813) 552-5000





N/A


Former name or former address, if changed since last report.





_______________________________________








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2).  Emerging growth company  ̈





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ̈











---







Item 5.02Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.


On August 24, 2018, Robert W. Edmund, Kforce’s General Counsel and Chief Talent Officer tendered his resignation from his position at Kforce Inc.




















---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





KFORCE INC.(Registrant)Date: August 28, 2018By:/s/    DAVID M. KELLYDavid M. KellySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Date: August 28, 2018By:/s/    JEFFREY B. HACKMANJeffrey B. HackmanSenior Vice President, Finance & Accounting(Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

[Letterhead of EideBailly LLP]

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We hereby consent to the inclusion, in Form 10-KSBdated March 31, 2008, of our audit report on the financial statements ofSouthwest Casino Corporation, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and forthe years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 as part of Southwest CasinoCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, and to the reference to ourfirm therein.

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-140934 on FormSB-2/A on Form S-1 of Southwest Casino Corporation of our audit report on thefinancial statements of Southwest Casino Corporation, as of December 31, 2007and 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, appearing in theAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of Southwest Casino Corporation for the year endedDecember 31, 2007.

 

 

/s/ Eide Bailly LLP

 

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 31, 2008

 

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 138 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the joint return 

limitation for capital gains exclusion to certain post-marriage sales of 

principal residences by surviving spouses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply 

the joint return limitation for capital gains exclusion 

to certain post-marriage sales of principal residences by 

surviving spouses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF JOINT RETURN LIMITATION 

4 FOR CAPITAL GAINS EXCLUSION TO CERTAIN 

5 POST-MARRIAGE SALES OF PRINCIPAL RESI6 DENCES BY SURVIVING SPOUSES. 

7 (a) SALE WITHIN 2 YEARS OF SPOUSE’S DEATH.— 

8 Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (reVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:17 Jan 07, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S138.IS S138

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 138 IS

1 lating to limitations) is amended by adding at the end the 

2 following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN SALES BY

4 SURVIVING SPOUSES.—In the case of a sale or ex5 change of property by an unmarried individual 

6 whose spouse is deceased on the date of such sale, 

7 paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting 

8 ‘$500,000’ for ‘$250,000’ if such sale occurs not 

9 later than 2 years after the date of death of such 

10 spouse and the requirements of paragraph (2)(A) 

11 were met immediately before such date of death.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to sales or exchanges after Decem14 ber 31, 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,036-02

EX P ARTE RONALD SHANKLIN, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR15003727-G (2) IN THE 319 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of assault of a pu b l ic serva nt and sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler

k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to an appea l beca use counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Acc ording ly , the re co rd s h o u ld be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for2

finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel 1 to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . ar t

. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name. The trial court s h al l make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as to whether Applicant

was denied his r ight to a

n appea l be cause trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of a ppeal. The trial court may make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appropr iate in re s p onse to Applicant’s c laim. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions o f law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motio n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Mar ch 9, 2022 Do not publish

I f a de fenda

nt decides to a

ppeal his convic tion, trial counsel ra ther than a ppellate 1 counsel ha s the duty

to ensure tha t written notice of a ppeal is filed with the tria l court. Jones , 98 S.W .3d at 703.
**Exhibit 23.**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S CONSENT**

 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-98073 of CommunityValley Bancorp on Form S-8 of our report, dated February 13, 2003, appearing inthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Community Valley Bancorp for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.

 

 
|                   |   | /s/ Perry-Smith LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|                   |   |                |
|                   |   |                |
| Sacramento, California |   |                |
| March 25, 2003         |   |                |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Joseph A. Orlando, as Principal Executive Officer of Leucadia National
Corporation - Arizona (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1) the accompanying Form 10-K report for the year ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:  March 28, 2003

                                      By:  /s/  Joseph A. Orlando
                                           ----------------------
                                           Joseph A. Orlando
                                           Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Leucadia National Corporation and will be retained by Leucadia
National Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Zheng Zhou, Shanghai, China, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's affidavit with exhibits sworn to August 9, 2019, and upon reading the responsive correspondence by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department dated October 18, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stonner], 175 AD3d 799 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Dorsett], 174 AD3d 1219 [2019]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Lynch, J.P., Clark, Mulvey and Devine, JJ., concur.
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (409 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (78 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (13 KB PDF)
Flows tables (143 KB PDF)
Level tables (119 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (19 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (29 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (632 KB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 5, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2957
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2957
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   107
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       39
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (125)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1037

TOWN OF YEMASSEE MUNICIPAL COURT,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NANCY D. JONAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Joseph E. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge; Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CA-03-1508-9-08AJ)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 18, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Nancy D. Jonas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nancy D. Jonas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

affirming the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and

dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss

the appeal in part for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of

appeal was not timely filed as to this order.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)).

The district court’s order that Jonas seeks to appeal was

entered on the docket on October 30, 2003. The notice of appeal

was filed on January 2, 2004. Because Jonas failed to file a

timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of

the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal to the extent that it

pertains to this order.

The notice of appeal is timely, however, as to the

district court’s orders denying Jonas’s motions for rehearing en

banc and her motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial. To

the extent that Jonas is appealing these orders, we note that she
- 3 -

was warned in the briefing order that this court would not consider

issues not specifically raised in her informal brief. See 4th Cir.

R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Jonas failed to raise any challenges to the

district court’s orders denying her post-judgment motions in her

informal brief and thus has failed to preserve any issues for our

review. Accordingly, we affirm these orders for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Yemassee Mun. Ct. v. Jonas, No.

CA-03-1508-9-08AJ (D.S.C. filed Dec. 9, 2003 & entered Dec. 10,

2003; Jan. 2, 2004; Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART,

AND DISMISSED IN PART
389 A.2d 166

#### Commonwealth v. Frankhouser, Appellant.

Submitted September 22, 1976.

Alan Ellis, and Ellis & Fincke, for appellant;

C. Kent Price, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1832 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1832

 To reauthorize the African Elephant Conservation Act, the Rhinoceros 
and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994, and the Asian Elephant Conservation 
                              Act of 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2007

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Mr. Warner, and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the African Elephant Conservation Act, the Rhinoceros 
and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994, and the Asian Elephant Conservation 
                              Act of 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Multinational Species Conservation 
Funds Reauthorization Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF AFRICAN ELEPHANT CONSERVATION ACT.

    Section 2306(a) of the African Elephant Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 
4245(a)) is amended by striking ``2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 
and 2007'' and inserting ``2007 through 2012''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF RHINOCEROS AND TIGER CONSERVATION ACT OF 
              1994.

    Section 10(a) of the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994 
(16 U.S.C. 5306(a)) is amended by striking ``2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 
2005, 2006, and 2007'' and inserting ``2007 through 2012''.

SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF ASIAN ELEPHANT CONSERVATION ACT OF 1997.

    Section 8(a) of the Asian Elephant Conservation Act of 1997 (16 
U.S.C. 4266(a)) is amended by striking ``2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 
2006, and 2007'' and inserting ``2007 through 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.226 Taxes Payable by Businesses** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
First Reliance Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), F.R. Saunders, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Jeffrey A. Paolucci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, do each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/  F. R. Saunders,
      JrF.
      R. Saunders, Jr.President
      / Chief Executive Officer
 
 /s/ Jeffrey A.
      PaolucciJeffrey A. PaolucciChief
      Financial Officer
 
 Date:
March 31, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael W. Zellner hereby certify, in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 27, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                       |  |     |  |                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    Michael W. Zellner   
|                       |  |     |  | Michael W. Zellner          
|                       |  |     |  | Vice President,             
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                       |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer