alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Phyllis Lipski BORDORF, Co-Executrix of the Estate of Max M. Lipski, and Phyllis Lipski Bordorf, Individually, Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. Zeldon Avrom LIPSKI, Co-Executor of the Estate of Max M. Lipski, and Zeldon Avron Lipski, Individually, Appellees Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 15, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 7, 1973.

Foster L. Haunz, Dougherty, Gray & Haunz, Stanley J. Bordorf, Louisville, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Foster L. Haunz, Dougherty, Gray & Grafton & Sloss, Louisville, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Justice STEPHENSON,

Affirming on Appeal, Affirming on Cross-Appeal*
EXHIBIT 35.1 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB**

**FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA**

Date: March 30, 2017 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of First National Bank of Omaha (the “Servicer”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB and Section 3.05(a) of the First Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated asof December 20, 2012, among First National Funding LLC, as Transferor, First National Bank of Omaha, as Servicer, and First National Master Note Trust, as Issuer (the “Transfer and Servicing Agreement”), does hereby certify that: 

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) andof its performance under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 

2. To the best of my knowledge,based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Servicer Compliance Statement the day and year firstwritten above. 

 
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, as ServicerBy /s/ Timothy D. Hart Timothy D. Hart Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development
Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

March 31, 2008
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.120 Federal Government Retirement Funds1** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1161

MANUEL HELMBRIGHT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

BONNIE DAVIS, in her private and official

capacity; CHIEF K. GESSLER, in his official

capacity; OFFICER WALLACE, in his official

capacity; UNKNOWN DESK OFFICER, in his

official capacity,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-1595

MANUEL HELMBRIGHT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

BONNIE DAVIS, in her private and official

capacity; CHIEF K. GESSLER, in his official

capacity; OFFICER WALLACE, in his official

capacity; UNKNOWN DESK OFFICER, in his

official capacity,

 Defendants - Appellees.
- 2 -

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (5:04-cv-00069-FPS)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: September 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel Helmbright, Appellant Pro Se. Paul C. Camilletti, CAMILETTI,

SACCO & PIZZUTI, Wheeling, West Virginia; Melanie Morgan Norris,

Jacob Andrew Manning, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Wheeling, West Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Helmbright appeals the district court’s orders

granting defendant police officers’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and vacating its pre-trial conference and trial

schedule in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Helmbright v. Davis,

No. 5:04-cv-00069-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 20, 2006; Mar. 23, 2006. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements on Form S-8: No. 333-138958, No. 333-141885, 333-149739 and 333-158333) and Form S-3 (No. 333-164594) of ourreport dated March 22, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Solta Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Solta Medical, Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Francisco, California 

March 22, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               CERTIFICATE OF CFO

      I, Leslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of Southern Community
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

      (3)   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
            certificate is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

      (4)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

Dated: March 31, 2005                 /s/ Leslye L. Grindle
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Leslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer
#### Painter *v.*The State, ex rel. Squire, Supt. of Banks, et al. (Two cases.)

(Nos. 25522 and 25523

Decided October 16, 1935.)

*Messrs. Boyd, Brooks & Wickham,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Baker, Hostetler, Sidlo é Patterson*and *Mr. Clayton A. Quintrell,*for defendants in error.

*191It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same are hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Petitions in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Williams and Matthias, JJ., not participating.
#### DRAKE v. SETZER SUPER STORES, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 31.1





BILL BARRETT CORPORATION


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, R. Scot Woodall, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                           
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017, of Bill Barrett Corporation; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date:March 19, 2018By:/s/ R. Scot WoodallR. Scot WoodallChief Executive Officer, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Talberg HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 35371.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Two.

March 26, 1974.

Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Court En Banc or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 8, 1974.

*7Brady, Brady & Devereaux, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Thomas W. Shannon, James I. Bucher, Stephen A. Moore, Dennis F. Kay, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction, in a court tried case, of a violation of Sec. 563.280, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. selling obscene matter. He was fined $300.

Defendant raises three points. His contention that no specific finding of obscenity was made by the trial court was ruled by us recently in State v. Richardson, 506 S.W.2d 488 (Mo.App.1974) contrary to defendant’s position. His attack on the “seizure” of the deck of cards is misplaced — there was no seizure, the policeman bought the deck of cards from defendant.

Defendant also contends scienter was not established. In State v. Richardson, supra, we outlined the rules of law respecting scienter in a case of selling obscene matter.

Here the police officer asked defendant if the book store carried playing cards. Upon being advised they were in the glass display counter, the officer requested they be shown to him. Defendant removed a deck of cards enclosed in a clear plastic case taped closed. The cards were not removed from the case, but the top card was clearly visible. In addition to the suit and number superimposed on two corners, the card was a color closeup of a penis partially inserted into a vagina. In response to a question defendant stated he wasn’t sure whether the pictures on the remaining cards were similar to the one on top. In fact, they were, although each was different. The officer then purchased the cards. Defendant had actual knowledge of the top card. It was reasonable to infer that he was aware that the rest of the cards portrayed similar activities, although he may not have known the exact content of each card, and that is enough to support the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

CLEMENS and GUNN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2002-2

              -----------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2002-2 does hereby certify that:

                  1.       The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to
                  the Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9
                  of the Indenture.

                  3.       A review of the activities of the Issuer during the
                  period from the closing date until December 31, 2003, and of
                  performance under this Indenture has been made under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

                  4.       To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on
                  such review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture
                  throughout the period from the closing date until December 31,
                  2003. No default in the compliance of any such condition or
                  covenant has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
                  paragraph 5 below.

                  5.       The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                      By: CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                          National Association, as Administrator




                                      By: /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                      Title: Vice President
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00434-RBJ Document 45 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JERMAINE A. BROWN, DOC #375222, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1887 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,183
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                23,850
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     46,444
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        137,035
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,802
<DEPOSITS>                                     187,692
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,729
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 222,802
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,971
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,181
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   658
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,810
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,573
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,839
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,971
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      369
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,067
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         710
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       710
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,467
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,524
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      288
<RECOVERIES>                                        41
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,646
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


State Energy Advisory Board

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference of the State Energy 
Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these teleconferences 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: October 16, 2008 at 1 p.m. EDT

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Burch, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, Acting Assistant Manager, Office of Commercialization and & 
Project Management, Golden Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 
1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401, Telephone 303/275-4801.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. No. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Update members on routine business matters.
    Public Participation: The teleconference is open to the public. 
Written statements may be filed with the Board either before or after 
the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gary Burch at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must be 
received five days prior to the conference call; reasonable provision 
will be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of 
the Board is empowered to conduct the call in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. This notice is being 
published less than 15 days before the date of the meeting due to 
programmatic issues that had to be resolved prior to publication.

    Notes: The notes of the teleconference will be available for 
public review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site, 
http://www.steab.org.


    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 8, 2008.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-24387 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1765 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1765

To amend title 10, United Stated Code, to expedite the prompt return of 
the remains of deceased members of the Armed Forces to their loved ones 
                              for burial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2007

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United Stated Code, to expedite the prompt return of 
the remains of deceased members of the Armed Forces to their loved ones 
                              for burial.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION OF REMAINS OF DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS.

    Section 1482(a)(8) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``When transportation of 
the remains includes transportation by aircraft, the Secretary 
concerned shall provide, to the maximum extent possible, for delivery 
of the remains by air to the commercial, general aviation, or military 
airport nearest to the place selected by the designee or, if such a 
selection is not made, nearest to the cemetery selected by the 
Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**ALTERA CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Altera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Timothy R. Morse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Date: November 3, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained byAltera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.