alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Reliv’ International, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert L.
      Montgomery, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D. Albright,
      as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Robert L. Montgomery


Robert
      L.
      Montgomery


Chief
      Executive Officer





Date:
      August 9, 2006





/s/
      Steven D. Albright


Steven
      D.
      Albright


Chief
      Financial Officer





Date:
      August 9, 2006





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      and
      is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
      section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
      Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically
      incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.12
 PRIMUS GUARANTY, LTD.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
(including amendments through January 28, 2009)
 Section 1. Purpose
  Section 2. Definitions




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Section 3. Shares Available under the Plan
 Aggregate Number of Shares Available for Awards
 Per Grantee Limitation on Share-Based Awards.
 Per Grantee Limitation on Other Awards.
 Section 4. Administration of the Plan
 Authority of the Administrator Section 162(m)
    3




---



##### 



Manner of Exercise of Administrator Authority.
 Limitation of Liability.
  4




---



##### 



Section 5. Awards
 Type of Awards
 Terms and Conditions of Awards
 Section 6. Terms Relating to Options
 Generally.
 Vesting.
 Exercise Price.
 Termination of Options.
   5




---



##### 



Exercise of Options.
 Transferability.
 Option Grant Guidelines.
 Section 7. Terms Relating to Awards of Shares and Share Units
 Grant and Restrictions.
 Forfeiture.
 Dividends.
  6




---



##### 



Share Units.
 Section 8. Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization
  Section 9. Restrictions on Shares
 Restrictions on Issuing Shares.
 Transfer of ISO Shares.
 Certificates for Shares.
  7




---



##### 



Section 10. Acceleration of Vesting
  Section 11. Performance Awards
 Performance Awards Granted to Designated Covered Employees.
 Performance Goals Generally. Section 162(m)
 Business Criteria.
 Performance Period; Timing for Establishing Performance Award Terms.
  8




---



##### 



Performance Award Pool. Section 11(a)(iii).
 Settlement of Performance Awards; Other Terms.
 Impact of Extraordinary Items or Changes in Accounting.
 Written Determinations.
 Status of Section 11(a) Awards under Section 162(m) of the Code.
  9




---



##### 



Section 12. General Provisions
     Section 13. Effective Date; Amendment or Termination
     10
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To The Board of Directors of
TNP Enterprises, Inc. and The Trustee
and Thrift Plan Committee of the
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
Thrift Plan for Employees:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-64215) on Form S-3 of Texas-New
Mexico Power Company and Registration Statement (No. 333-38634) on Form S-4 of
TNP Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated June 16, 2000 included in TNP
Enterprises, Inc.'s Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and to all
references to our Firm included in this registration statement.

                                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Fort Worth, Texas,
 June 16, 2000
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, James Briscoe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Star Gold Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Liberty Star Gold Corp. for the period ended January 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Liberty Star Gold Corp.                                                             |

Dated: May 1, 2006

 

/s/ James Briscoe

James Briscoe

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberty Star Gold Corp. and will be retained by Liberty Star Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Sam Lessman, as Guardian ad Litem of David Lessman, an Infant, Petitioner, against City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 20, 1957.

*Myron Kahn*for petitioner.

*Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (George F. Hennessy*of counsel), for respondent.

Joseph A. Gavagah, J.

This is an application under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to file a late notice of claim in behalf of an infant six years of age. The claim arises out of injuries allegedly sustained by the infant on September 6,1956. The infant’s father, a survivor of European concentration camps and a recently naturalized citizen of the United States, asserts that his failure to file a timely notice of claim was caused by his ignorance of the law “ and a general attitude of timorousness engendered by his terrible past.” Neither the ignorance nor the fear of the applicant affords legal justification for this delay. However, it is well recognized that the rights of an immature infant shall not be forfeited because of the failure of some other party to act *(Biancoviso*v. *City of New York,*285 App. Div. 320, 325). Where, as here, the delay in filing is reasonably attributable to the fact of infancy, the strict requirements of the statute should not be enforced against an infant six years of age *(Russo*v. *City of New York,*258 N. Y. 344, 348). Under such circumstances, discretion dictates that this infant be allowed his day in court. The motion is accordingly granted. Settle order.
Case 1:11-cv-01928-RBJ Document 3 Filed 08/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01928-RBJ Document 3 Filed 08/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01928-RBJ Document 3 Filed 08/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01928-RBJ Document 3 Filed 08/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
#### Albert Otto OTTOWAY, and Marjorie Joyce Ottoway, Appellants, v. Milton LINN, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

July 9, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related Prospectus of SAFLINK Corporation
for the registration of 13,010,706 shares of its common stock and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 25, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of SAFLINK Corporation included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tampa, Florida
January 18, 2001
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Janice L. Boardman, Philip W. Boardman and Reginald Senf, Defendants.

County Court, Westchester County,

May 6, 1957.

*Roger Sherman, Corporation Counsel,*for plaintiff.

*Henry Smith*for defendants.

Harold T. Garrity, J.

It is with considerable reluctance that this court must decline to entertain jurisdiction of this criminal proceeding. There are several rather intriguing questions of law involved, the consideration of which has stimulated considerable research.

This prosecution is pending in the County Court by virtue of its removal from the City Court of Rye, subject to the consent of the County Court. Both Judges of the lower court have disqualified themselves. We preliminarily entertained jurisdiction, and it was presented on the basis of virtually an agreed statement of facts.

*646Initiated by an information filed by the city’s building inspector, the defendants are charged with violating the Building Zone Ordinance of the City of Bye in that they unlawfully extended a nonconforming use.

In the course of our independent inquiry into the pertinent precedents and authorities, we examined the Charter of the City of Rye (L. 1940, ch. 505) which had not been cited. We there encountered section 363, which provides: *R*emoval of cases to grand jury. Any charge of misdemeanor pending before the city court or city judge or assistant city judge may be removed to a court sitting with the grand jury by the method now or hereafter provided in sections fifty-seven and fifty-eight of the code of criminal procedure, *but a complaint or charge for a violation of an ordinance must not be removed.”*(Italics supplied.)

The zoning enactment in question is an ordinance. It is therefore abundantly clear that the mandatory language of the Legislature contained in said section is binding upon this court. Under the circumstances jurisdiction cannot be conferred, even by consent.

We accordingly have no alternative but to decline jurisdiction and remand the matter to the City Court of Bye. Submit order.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1896 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1896

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ``Officer 
                   Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER JEREMY TODD CHARRON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Officer Jeremy Todd Charron Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1896

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ``Officer 
                   Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office''.
```
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form-20-F of Aurelia Energy N.V. (the “Company”)for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugo Heerema, certifythat to the best of my knowledge:

**1****                                        **TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

**2****                                        **Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: April 10, 2007 | By:      | /s/ Hugo Heerema                                        |
|-----------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | * * | Hugo Heerema*Managing Director  Bluewater Holding B.V.* |

 

----
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2010*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.117 Life Insurance Companies** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Submitted May 6, 2019*

Decided May 23, 2019 

Before 

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge 

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge 

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 19-1869 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

ANTWON D. JENKINS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

 

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Illinois. 

No. 12-cr-30239 

Staci M. Yandle, 

Judge. 

O R D E R 

 We stayed Antwon Jenkins’s direct appeal from his conviction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) because the Supreme Court is currently considering a challenge to that 

statutory provision. On February 1, 2019, we affirmed the district court’s denial of 

several motions Jenkins filed requesting copies of motions and briefs filed during his 

prosecution. United States v. Jenkins, 750 F. App’x 486 (7th Cir. 2019). 

 

*

 After examining the record, we have concluded that oral argument is 

unnecessary. Thus the appeal is submitted on the record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION 

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 
No. 19-1869 Page 2 

 Jenkins subsequently filed a variety of other motions on the district court docket. 

He seeks a new trial, clarification on the length of sentence he has yet to serve, release 

pending resentencing, complimentary copies of court documents, and a deferment of 

his restitution payments until after resentencing. The district court denied each motion. 

 None of these motions merit extended discussion. He filed the motion for a new 

trial, citing newly discovered evidence, over four years after his conviction. Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(b) requires defendants to file such motions within three 

years of the guilty verdict. And Rule 33(b) further specifies that, if an appeal is pending, 

the district court may not grant a new trial until court of appeals remands the case. Id.

Jenkins cannot obtain relief under Rule 33(b). 

 The district court properly denied Jenkins’s requests for documents and 

information for the reasons given in our order of February 1, 2019, and the district 

court’s decision. And the district court also correctly denied his motions for release 

pending resentencing and to halt restitution payments. The jury convicted Jenkins of 

kidnapping and using a firearm to commit a federal crime of violence. His direct appeal 

challenges only the second conviction. He was sentenced to 188 months on the 

kidnapping count and ordered to compensate his victim for medical expenses. The 

direct appeal will not affect the sentence or restitution stemming from Count 1, and so 

the court properly denied these motions. 

 We AFFIRM the district court’s order of April 22, 2019, denying Jenkins’s 

motions.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 53017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Office of the General Counsel; Appointment of Members of the 
Legal Division to the Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue 
Service

    Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal 
Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the 
Treasury by General Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the Civil Service 
Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal 
Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:
    1. Chairperson, Clarissa Potter, Deputy Chief Counsel (Technical)
    2. Sara M. Coe, Deputy Division Counsel (Small Business/Self 
Employed)
    3. Curtis Wilson, Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special 
Industries)
    4. Andrew Keyso, Deputy Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & 
Accounting)
    5. Drita Tonuzi, Deputy Division Counsel (Large & Mid-Size 
Business)
    This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: August 23, 2010.
William J. Wilkins,
Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21325 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
TGI-EX10.24-3.31.2014






Exhibit 10.24




[Date]








[Name]
[Address]




Dear ___________:


I am pleased to inform you that you are eligible to participate in the Triumph Restricted Stock Plan for fiscal ____.  Under this plan, you are receiving an award with the potential to earn $__________ in long term incentive compensation for the ____ fiscal year.  This award value is equivalent to _____% of your base salary.  The award, if earned (as described below), provides for the potential receipt of shares of restricted stock granted under Triumph’s Group 2013 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (equal to ___% of the award value) and cash (equal to ___% of the award value).  The number of shares of restricted stock to be issued if the award is earned will be based upon the Triumph Group stock price at the time the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) determines that the award has been earned.
This award will be earned by you if Triumph achieves [performance metric] for fiscal _____ of at least $____.  The determination as to whether the award is earned will be made by the Committee within 90 days after the end of fiscal ____.  If earned, the award will be subject to forfeiture restrictions and will “vest” and become payable to you on __________, at which time you will receive the cash portion of the award and the shares, fully released from all forfeiture restrictions, as long as you remain employed by Triumph or one of its affiliates through that vesting date.
If you have any questions about this award, please contact _____________ at Corporate (_____________).
Thank you for your efforts and your contribution to the success of Triumph Group, Inc.
Sincerely,
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Mortgage  Assistance Center  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Richard  Coleman,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2007                     By: /s/ Richard D.  Coleman
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Richard D. Coleman
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (principal financial officer)
Order filed January 8, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00513

- CV

____________ SUNCHASE AMERICAN, L TD , Appellant

V.

ELBERT WARNER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10CV3896

- A



### ORDER Appellant's brief was due December 18 , 2012. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant submits its brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, to the clerk of this court on or before February 7 , 201 3 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM