alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SEROLOGICALS CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 27, 1999, AS SET FORTH IN ITS
FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                             917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,830
<PP&E>                                          42,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,611
<SALES>                                         72,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,260
<CGS>                                           49,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (9)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael W. Zellner hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael W. Zellner      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Michael W. Zellner          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President,             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer
#### Oscar Clay RUSSELL, Jr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 22, 1971.

Oscar Clay Russell, Jr., pro se.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., George Rabe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

STEINFELD, Judge.

Appellant Russell, Jr. appeals from an order overruling his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to RCr 11.42. It is our opinion that appellant’s complaints are without merit.

Appellant alleged in his post-conviction proceedings that he was deprived of his constitutional right to have a preliminary hearing. He was charged with two counts of indecent and immoral practices with another (KRS 435.105). The trial court found that the record indicated the appellant was given a preliminary hearing on one count of the charge on April 8, 1970, and that he was present and repre*260sented by appointed counsel. The Commonwealth concedes that on the other count he did not receive a preliminary hearing. In these circumstances we have declared the law to be: “ * * * in the absence of exceptional circumstances, the nature, purpose, and effect of a preliminary hearing (or the absence thereof) are strictly incidental to a criminal prosecution in Kentucky and do not render it a critical stage of the proceedings against the accused. * * * Since there was no examining trial, nothing could have occurred in it to prejudice the constitutional rights of the accused in his trial on the merits.” Commonwealth v. Watkins, Ky., 398 S.W. 2d 698 (1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 965, 86 S.Ct. 1596, 16 L.Ed.2d 677 (1966); Williams v. Commonwealth, Ky., 405 S.W.2d 17 (1966).

Appellant alleges that he was “brought to trial on a defective and void indictment” since it did not state as an element of the charge that appellant was seventeen years or over and the indictment had been altered to indicate such without his knowledge or consent. The trial court found that the record1 showed the indictment was amended before verdict on motion of the Commonwealth to show the age of Russell, Jr. to be over 17 years, that no additional or different offense was charged, and the rights of appellant were not prejudiced by the amendment. RCr 6.-16 provides: “The court may permit an indictment or information to be amended any time before verdict or finding if po additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.” The trial court correctly held RCr 6.16 had been complied with.

We shall not consider the remaining arguments which appear in appellant’s brief since they were not raised at the trial-court level. Brister v. Commonwealth, Ky., 439 S.W.2d 940 (1969).

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

1

. The record was not filed in the appellate court.
| 1. | I      have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,      2008 of Bluegate Corporation; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this      report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal      control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules      13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and  have: |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent    functions): |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May      6, 2008  |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Stephen J. Sperco        |   |
| Stephen      J. Sperco       |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Fidelity  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Richard G. Spencer,
Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa L. Griffith, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Richard G. Spencer                          /s/ Lisa L. Griffith
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Richard G. Spencer                              Lisa L. Griffith
Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Financial Officer




May 16, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

G. Brad Beckstead
-----------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                         330 E. Warm Springs Rd.
                                                             Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                                    702.528.1984
                                                               425.928.2877 efax




October 12, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I was previously principal accountant for Insynq, Inc. (the "Company") and
reported on the financial statements of the Company for the years ended May 31,
2000 and 1999. Effective October 11, 2000, my appointment as principal
accountant was terminated. I have read the Company's statements included under
Item 4 of its Form 8-K dated October 11, 2000, and I agree with such statements,
except that I am not in a position to agree or disagree with the Company's
statement that the change was approved by the Board of Directors or that Grant
Thornton LLP was not engaged regarding any matter requiring disclosure under
Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(2).

Very truly yours,

/s/ G. BRAD BECKSTEAD

G. Brad Beckstead
NO. 07-12-0109-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL B 

MAY 2, 2012 

_____________________________ 

SILVERIO DELGADO-GUTIERREZ, 

 Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 Appellee 

_____________________________ 

FROM THE 242nd DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; 

NO. B18797-1104; HONORABLE EDWARD SELF, PRESIDING 

_____________________________ 

ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

_____________________________ 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

 Pending before the court is an appeal by Silverio Delgado-Gutierrez. He was 

convicted of arson and sentenced to a probated term of five years imprisonment. There 

appears some suggestion that appellant has absconded and remains at large despite 

his conviction and sentence. In response to this Court’s letter dated April 17, 2012, 

asking appellant to certify that payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s and 

reporter’s records have been made, counsel for appellant moved to withdraw because 
2

he was unaware of his client’s location, despite diligent efforts to contact appellant. 

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. 

 The trial court is ordered to convene a hearing, upon reasonable notice, to 

determine whether 1) appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, 2) appellant is indigent 

and, therefore, entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal, and 3) 

appellant has absconded from the jurisdiction of this State. The argument and 

evidence, if any, presented at the hearing will be transcribed into a supplemental 

reporter’s record, which record the trial court will cause to be filed with the clerk of this 

court by June 1, 2012. The trial court may also execute any written findings of fact and 

conclusions of law which it may deem relevant to the matter. If such written findings 

and conclusions are created, they shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record 

which the trial court will cause to be filed with the clerk of this court by June 1, 2012. 

Should further time be needed to complete the foregoing tasks, same must be 

requested before June 1, 2012. 

 It is so ordered. 

 Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 28 Filed 03/29/06 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 28 Filed 03/29/06 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 28 Filed 03/29/06 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 28 Filed 03/29/06 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 28 Filed 03/29/06 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 28 Filed 03/29/06 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson Income Real Estate, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 13, 2007
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 13, 2007





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification  of  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Crescent  Communications, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.C.  63.
----------

I,  Mike McDonald, the Chief Financial Officer of Crescent Communications, Inc.,
hereby  certify  that  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10-QSB,  for  the  period  ending  June  30,  2003,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and  that  information  contained  in  the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents,  in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations  of  Crescent  Communications,  Inc.


                                    ---------------------------------
Date:     August  14,  2003         /s/     Mike  McDonald
                                    Mike  McDonald
                                    Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 13.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Brockton Capital Corp., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act (the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Roy Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Roy Brown Roy Brown, Chief Financial Officer   Date: September 6, 2006     1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3





                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of
First National Master Note Trust (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2002, I, Matthew W. Lawver, President of First National Funding Corporation as
managing member of First National Funding LLC as transferor, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                         FIRST NATIONAL MASTER NOTE TRUST

                                         By First National Funding LLC

                                         By: First National Funding Corporation,
                                         Managing Member, as Transferor


                                         By: /s/ Matthew W. Lawver
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Matthew W. Lawver, President

Date:  April 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BLUEGATE CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18
U.S.C. 63.

I, Mike McDonald, the Chief Financial Officer of Bluegate Corporation, hereby
certify that Bluegate Corporation's periodic report on Form 10-QSB, for the
period ending September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
Bluegate Corporation



Date: November 22, 2004                    /s/Mike McDonald
                                           ----------------
                                           Mike McDonald
                                           Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1703

TIFFANY RICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. MICHAEL Q. HUYNH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:20-cv-00292-RGD-DEM)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William G. Shields, SHIELDS LAW FIRM PLLC, North Chesterfield, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Sandra M. Douglas, HANCOCK, DANIEL & JOHNSON, P.C., Glen Allen, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1703 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tiffany Ricks appeals the district court’s entry of judgment in Defendant’s favor 

after the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Rick’s 

motion to permit a late expert witness identification and then granted Defendant’s motion 

for summary judgment on Ricks’ malpractice claim. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. We therefore defer to the district court’s “broad discretion in 

determining whether [Ricks’] . . . untimely disclosure of evidence [wa]s substantially 

justified or harmless,” Hill v. Coggins, 867 F.3d 499, 507 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal 

quotation marks omitted), and affirm the district court’s judgment, see Ricks v. Huynh, 

No. 2:20-cv-00292-RGD-DEM (E.D. Va. May 20, 2021). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1703 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 32.1

U.S.GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel J. Kunz, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The annual report of U.S. Geothermal Inc. on Form 10-K
      for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (report), which this
      certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the business issuer.                                                                                                         



|Date: September 26, 2007 | 
|------------------------ | 
|                         | 
|                         | 
|/s/ Daniel J.
    Kunz   | 
|Daniel J. Kunz           | 
|Chief Executive Officer  | 

---