Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2008 / Notices 7713 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b). The Department 

calculated an assessment rate for each 

importer of the subject merchandise 

covered by the review. Upon issuance of 

the final results of this review, for any 

importer–specific assessment rates 

calculated in the final results that are 

above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 

percent), we will issue appraisement 

instructions directly to CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on appropriate 

entries by applying the assessment rate 

to the entered value of the merchandise. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 356.8(a), the 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 41 days after the 

date of publication of these final results 

of review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Notice of Policy 

Concerning Assessment of Antidumping 

Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 

clarification will apply to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Mexinox for which 

Mexinox did not know the merchandise 

was destined for the United States. In 

such instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

30.85 percent all–others rate if there is 

no company–specific rate for an 

intermediary involved in the 

transaction. See id. for a full discussion 

of this clarification. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of these final results of 

administrative review, consistent with 

section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1) 

the cash deposit rate for the reviewed 

company will be the rate listed above; 

(2) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, but was covered in a 

previous review or the original less than 

fair value (LTFV) investigation, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company–specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 30.85 

percent, the all–others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation. See Notice of 

Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel 

Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, 64 

FR 40560 (July 27, 1999). These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until publication of the 

final results of the next administrative 

review. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act. 

Dated: February 4, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

Appendix – Issues in Decision 

Memorandum 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Revocation 

Comment 2: Offsetting for U.S. Sales 

that Exceed Normal Value 

Adjustments to United States Price 

Comment 3: U.S. Indirect Selling 

Expenses 

Comment 4: Temporary Import Bonds 

Adjustments to Normal Value 

Comment 5: Handling Expense 

Comment 6: Circumstance–of-Sale 

Adjustment 

Cost of Production 

Comment 7: Major Input Rule 

Comment 8: Employee Profit Sharing 

Comment 9: Year–End Inflation 

Adjustment to G&A 

Comment 10: Depreciation 

Comment 11: Interest Expense 

Comment 12: Packing Expense 

Comment 13: G&A Expense 

[FR Doc. E8–2464 Filed 2–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Joint 

Environmental Impact Statement / 

Environmental Impact Report for the 

Proposed Relocation of the National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration’s Southwest Fisheries 

Science Center located in La Jolla, 

California 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a 

joint National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) and California 

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 

Environmental Impact Report (EIR); 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NOAA announces its intent to 

prepare a joint EIS/EIR to analyze the 

environmental impacts of relocating its 

Southwest Fisheries Science Center 

(SWFSC) near the Scripps Institution of 

Oceanography (SIO) within the 

University of California at San Diego 

(UCSD) campus in La Jolla, California. 

Publication of this notice is to request 

public participation during preparation 

of the EIS/EIR to help determine the 

scope of environmental issues and range 

of alternatives to be addressed, and to 

provide information as to how to 

participate. 

DATES: A public scoping meeting will 

held on the following date:Wednesday, 

February 20, 2008 – 5 p.m. tour of 

SWFSC and 6 p.m. meeting start time, 

SWFSC Lab, Building A, Large 

Conference Room, 8604 La Jolla Shores 

Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anne Elston, Environmental Research 

Analyst, SRI International, 333 

Ravenswood Avenue, G 234, Menlo 

Park, CA 94025–3493; e-mai 

anne.elston@sri.com 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

National Marine Fisheries Service 

(NMFS) is responsible for the 

management, conservation, and 

protection of living marine resources 

within the U.S. Exclusive Economic 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
7714 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2008 / Notices 

Zone. The SWFSC in La Jolla, 

California, manages and conducts 

research involving Pacific fisheries and 

marine mammal research for the 

protection and management of these 

resources throughout the Western 

Pacific and the Antarctic. The existing 

SWFSC facility, built in 1964, is 

currently adjacent to a coastal bluff that 

is undergoing severe erosion and retreat. 

NOAA proposes to construct a new 

SWFSC building to replace its existing 

NMFS administrative and marine 

research facilities currently located in 

La Jolla, California. A minimum of two 

existing at risk SWFSC structures would 

be removed and the property currently 

used by NOAA would be returned to the 

UCSD for other appropriate uses. 

NOAA is the lead Federal agency for 

implementation of the NEPA. The 

University of California is the lead 

agency under the CEQA. The existing 

and preferred sites for the SWFSC 

headquarters are at the UCSD campus. 

The NMFS, SIO and other marine 

research organizations conduct 

independent and joint research at the 

SWFSC and its salt water laboratory 

facilities. 

The proposed project will require 

construction of a new facility to support 

SWFSC administrative and marine 

research operations. The preferred site 

will enable NMFS, SIO, and others to 

continue collaboration within a wide 

range of programmatic marine research 

disciplines. NOAA, in cooperation with 

UCSD, has decided to prepare a joint 

EIS/EIR to analyze the environmental 

impacts of relocating the SWFSC 

facilities at UCSD. 

Other alternative actions considered 

are: 

Use of other NOAA facility locations 

in California and other Pacific Coast 

states; 

Use of alternative sites at or adjacent 

to SIO for collaborative research; and 

Use of existing alternative NOAA 

facilities and properties away from 

UCSD. 

This joint EIS/EIR will analyze 

environmental impacts that may result 

from construction and/or operation of 

the proposed facilities. These potential 

environmental issues to be addressed 

include: land use and coastal zone 

management; aesthetics; geology; 

hydrology and water resources; 

biological resources and protected 

species; utilities and public services; 

transportation and traffic circulation, 

recreational resources; air quality; noise 

and vibration; visual effects and 

aesthetics; cultural resources; and 

socioeconomics and land use; and 

cumulative effects. 

The most salient and foreseeable 

environmental topics of greatest interest 

are expected to be aesthetics, 

transportation and traffic, hydrology, 

and short term noise effects. 

Interested parties who wish to submit 

suggestions or comments regarding the 

scope or content on the proposed EIS/ 

EIR are invited to attend the public 

scoping meeting. 

Dated: February 6, 2008. 

William F. Broglie, 

Chief Administrative Officer, National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–2457 Filed 2–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–12–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control 

Program: Approval Decision on 

Florida’s and South Carolina’s Coastal 

Nonpoint Pollution Control Programs 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, and the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Approve the 

Florida and South Carolina Coastal 

Nonpoint Programs. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

intent to fully approve the Florida and 

South Carolina Coastal Nonpoint 

Pollution Control Programs (coastal 

nonpoint program) and of the 

availability of the draft decision 

documents fully approving the Florida 

and South Carolina coastal nonpoint 

programs. Section 6217 of the Coastal 

Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments 

(CZARA), 16 U.S.C. section 1455b, 

requires States and Territories with 

coastal zone management programs that 

have received approval under section 

306 of the Coastal Zone Management 

Act, 16 U.S.C. section 1455, to develop 

and implement coastal nonpoint 

programs. Coastal States and Territories 

were required to submit their coastal 

nonpoint programs to the National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA) and the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

for approval in July 1995. NOAA and 

EPA conditionally approved the Florida 

and South Carolina coastal nonpoint 

programs on November 18, 1997 and 

February 23, 1998, respectively. NOAA 

and EPA have drafted approval 

decisions describing how Florida and 

South Carolina have satisfied the 

conditions placed on their programs and 

therefore have a fully approved coastal 

nonpoint program. 

NOAA and EPA are making the draft 

decisions for the Florida and South 

Carolina coastal nonpoint programs 

available for a 30-day public comment 

period. If comments are received, 

NOAA and EPA will consider whether 

such comments are significant enough 

to affect the decision to fully approve 

the programs. 

Copies of the draft Approval 

Decisions can be found on the NOAA 

Web site at http:// 

coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/czm/ 

6217/findings.html or may be obtained 

upon request from: Allison Castellan, 

Coastal Programs Division (N/ORM3), 

Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource 

Management, NOS, NOAA, 1305 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 

20910, phone (301) 713–3155, x125, email Allison.Castellan@noaa.gov. 

DATES: Individuals or organizations 

wishing to submit comments on the 

draft Approval Decisions should do so 

by March 12, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be made 

to: John King, Chief, Coastal Programs 

Division (N/ORM3), Office of Ocean and 

Coastal Resource Management, NOS, 

NOAA, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver 

Spring, Maryland 20910, phone (301) 

713–3155, x188, e-mail 

John.King@noaa.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Castellan, Coastal Programs 

Division, (N/ORM3), Office of Ocean 

and Coastal Resource Management, 

NOS, NOAA, 1305 East-West Highway, 

Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, phone 

(301) 713–3155, x125, e-mail 

Allison.Castellan@noaa.gov. 

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog 11.419 

Coastal Zone Management Program 

Administration) 

Dated: February 5, 2008. 

John H. Dunnigan, 

Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services 

and Coastal Zone Management, National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

Benjamin H. Grumbles, 

Assistant Administrator, Office of Water, 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

[FR Doc. 08–596 Filed 2–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–08–M 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES