alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 22, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    STEPHEN J.
FANNING            
|                     |  |     |  | Stephen J. Fanning                   
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

I, John F. Glenn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 22, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN F.
GLENN   
|                     |  |     |  | John F. Glenn          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection withthis
      Amendment No. 2 tothe
      Annual Report of TXP Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year
      ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Shores, Principal Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to TXP Corporation and will be retained by TXP Corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


*/s/  Michael
                      C. Shores*Michael
                      C. ShoresPresident
                      and Chief Executive Officer*(Principal
                      Executive
                      Officer)*


October 14,
        2008
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS** AUSTIN

I). as towhather

In the name of of this Coda, **judgments** and my provision of WI Cod., ahall forthwlth bo paid over by the oirIOer8 oolleotlag the ama to tha couatq treamrmr of the pmpr oounty, after first deduotlng thanfrom thr legal fees and oommIaaIons for oolleotlng the mme.‘*8on. Willie o*rWal, Ray 26, 1939, Page 2

“Art. MO.- Commissions on Colleotionr. The dI8trIot or countFattorney m be entitled to ten per oent o? all riner, forioiture8 orm0neys oolleote4 ?or the state or oounty, upon judgments reootersd by him; and the olerk oi the court in whioh uld judgmnto are rendered shall be entitled to rive per cent of the mount o? 8aid judgments, to be paid out or the mount when oollected." Itonepocrlleatedbl **fin08** In public roaoy **aad**belong **to** the St&o. The **net**

## proceedsoolleat**ad** by

## ?lnas must be pald over k, the oounty treasuror, uul.oeothe fina were imposed by a oorperatloa aourt 

## or on appml 

## ?roma

## ju@mentrendered In

## 8uoh aourt, in rbioh oa8e the smnef oolleoted must be **paid** into themunloipal treasury. However, kton payin& 

### over the anwunt o? the fines, which have been ooll8oted in the name or ior the u8e o? the State or oounty, the oiiIcer8 who are responsible ?or the c01- leotIon8 are entitled to deduct as commission rliteen per cent of this amount, ten per cent ior the district or oounty attorney, and live per cent for the clerk of the court. The clerk o? a court ahall be entitled to rive per oent on all fines.

Iiartv. State, 70 S?i948; A:oLennanCounty 

### Y. Xqgess, 139 1:'1054; Tex. Jur., 

## Vol. 19. F. 654; Tex. Jur., Vol. 9.. p. 251. "Art. 951.- CommIssIons to other 

## orrioera. The sherlr? or otherT?G,<xm justloo o? the peace or his clerk, who collects money ror the State or county, 

### l xoept jury feea, under any provision 0r 

## thlr **Code,** shall be entitled to retain tire per cent thereo? when oolleoted.w This Is a oolloctlon statute and provides **for** the relcuneratlono? the orricer who Is charged bp law with the duty o? collecting the iine. It ool

## laotlon or rIne8 and ?or?eIturee, the sherl?? can only retain as ices or orfloe rive per cent or the sum actually collected by him. ?haw v. grown, 41 Tax. 

## 446:Eon. Willie O*Neal, Ka7 26, 1939, raga S

It 18, thwefore, our opinion that 

## rirteen par oaat of 

## thefin08rhouldbe deducted and dlatrlbuted aa

## roiidn: Aoonmis8lon ortenper**oent** to be 

### l p pliad

tg the

## rem80r the orrlce 

## 0r the county or di8tdOt~attorUe~ and rive per cent to the tree ~~0r~dftioe



### or clerk

## 0r the court inwhioh the rlnea **wro iAposed.** 

It in our opinion that the count7 olerk i8 -1tl.d to

## rim par oent

## 0rflrW8. It is *other bur opinion that 

## the8herirr 18entitled to 

## rtve par 6.nt of rima in

## 8UohiMtUlOe8 only a8 euch

## fine8 are

## oollootodby the shorl??. Your8 tory tnrlr
ATTCFN:Y GEIWKAL OF TNXAS

By (Signed) ':.P. ::'atta ' I'?
. P. mtts Assistant

APFROVED: fsignod) Oerand C. h!ann ATTORNEY GENSRAL OF **‘ TEXAS** 

APIROVZD Opinion Coamlttee 81 R= Chair-
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 28, 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00697

- CV

Pamela Mehl, Appellant

v.

David Stern, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN AND BOUR LAND AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND VACATED IN PART;

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on July 29, 2014 . Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

court’s judgment

. T he Court affirms the portion of the trial court’s default judgment as to its

liability findings against appellant Pamela Mehl. We reverse the portion of the judgment as to

the awarded remedies and vacate the appointment of the receiver. We remand the case to the

trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The appellee shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 22, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 22, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0100. SOUTHERN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ADRIAN CONTRERAS

et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

13A08368
Order filed, January 10, 2018.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-17-00960-CR

EX PARTE JOSE LUIS NASSAR RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 1484221-A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 12/29/2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order Kathleen Powers, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal, if any, within 10 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
#### Don Lee DAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44385.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1971.

Weldon Holcomb, Tyler, for appellant.

Curtis L. Owen, Dist. Atty., Tyler, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

On March 16, 1970, appellant was convicted for the misdemeanor offense of driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment, a jail term of eighteen days and a fine of $200, was probated for six months. A condition of probation was that he commit no offense against the laws of this State.

A motion to revoke probation was filed August 12, 1970. It alleged the appellant violated a condition of his probation on July 11, 1970, by driving a motor vehicle on a public highway in Upshur County while intoxicated.

Two highway patrolmen testified that they saw the appellant driving on a public highway in an erratic manner. They stopped him and noticed that he had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath. Both testified that he was very intoxicated. The evidence is sufficient to show that he was driving on a public highway while intoxicated. See Alexander v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 66, 274 S.W.2d 831.

The main contention of the appellant is that the probation should not have been revoked, because he was not finally convicted for the commission of the offense alleged for revocation.

It has been the consistent holding of this Court that where a commission of an offense is alleged and proved, no final conviction is necessary for the revocation of probation. Mason v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 473 S.W.2d 15; Dunn v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 520, 265 S.W.2d 589. Counsel for the appellant recognizes this but asks us to *247change the rule. We have declined, as we do now, to require a conviction to revoke probation.

No abuse of discretion has been shown.

The order revoking probation is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Kinder Morgan Debenture-Backed Series 2002-6 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in such
distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2015               
|                                   
|/s/ David Kolibachuk               
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Southern Arizona Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Tucson, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee members to discuss committee protocols, operating guidelines, and project proposal requirements.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 14, 2010, beginning at 10 a.m. to approximately 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the National Advanced Fire and Resource Institute (NAFRI) at 3265 E. Universal Way, Tucson, Arizona 85756. Send written comments to Jennifer Ruyle, RAC Coordinator, Southern Arizona Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Coronado National Forest, 300 W. Congress, Tucson, Arizona 85701 or electronically to                         *jruyle@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Ruyle, Coronado National Forest, (520) 388-8351.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public and opportunity for public input will be provided. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring Public Law 110-343 related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting.

      ( print page 52716)    
Dated: August 19, 2010.

Robert Lee,

Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2010-21152 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
**Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rurban Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth A. Joyce, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                    /s/  Kenneth A. Joyce*   Print Name:  Kenneth A. Joyce   Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-19154-18, F-19154-24, F-19154-30; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the surface and subsurface estates in 
certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. The 
lands are in the vicinity of Kivalina and Noatak, Alaska, and are 
located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 23 N., R. 19 W.,
    Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive.
    Containing approximately 19,050 acres.
T. 27 N., R. 19 W.,
    Secs. 2 to 11, inclusive;
    Secs. 15 to 22, inclusive;
    Secs. 27 to 34, inclusive.
    Containing approximately 16,430 acres.
T. 29 N., R. 27 W.,
    Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive.
    Containing approximately 21,629 acres.
    Aggregating approximately 57,108 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Arctic Sounder.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until November 17, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from:
    Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh 
Avenue, <greek-i>13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#06676d28646a6b2865696870637f6768656346676d28646a6b28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea8b81c4888687c48985849c8f938b84898faa8b81c4888687c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Hillary Woods,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E8-24633 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 309 9

_____________________________ O SYMA D EL V ALLE , Appellant,

v.

R EEMPLOYMENT A SSISTANCE A PPEALS C OMMISSION and M ORNING S TAR C ENTERS , I NC ., Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Charles T. Faircloth, Chairman.

May 8, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a)

R OBERTS , R AY , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Osyma Del Valle, pro se, Appellant.

Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

.
ANGELO M. REDDICK,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1606

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 22, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

Angelo M. Reddick, pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Montague *v.*The New York Central Rd. Co. et al.

(No. 25808

Decided February 5, 1936.)

*Mr. Arthur It. Cline*and *Mr. Silas E. Kurin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Boyle & Lewis, Mr. Milo J. Warner, Mr. Clarence A. Irwin, Mr. W. Q. Christensen, Mr. Leo J. Kahn*and *Mr. Lee K. Schminch,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
#### J. W. WHITICE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 18, 1936.

Errol S. Willes, of Fort Pierce, for plaintiff in error.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Angus Sumner, State Atty., of Fort Pierce, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the circuit court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 So. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 So. 450.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS. TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
#### EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP., LTD. v. STATE SECURITIES, INC., et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 19, 1973.

Richard M. Trautwein, Rubin & Traut-wein, Louisville, for appellant.

John Frith Stewart, Robert M. Lindsay, Segal, Isenberg, Sales & Stewart, Harry K. Herron, Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, Louisville, for appellees.

Opinion of the Court by

Special Commissioner J. BRANDON PRICE,

Reversing.*