##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-KSB
 (Mark One) þ
    
    Annual Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   o
    
    Transition Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  0-49764
(Commission File No.) SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE,
INC.
  FLORIDA
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization
    
    65  1082270
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)516 PAUL MORRIS DRIVE ENGLEWOOD, FLORIDA
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    34223
(Zip Code)
 Issuers Telephone Number, including area code: (941) 681-3100
Securities registered under Section 12(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: NONE Securities registered under Section 12(g)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment
to this Form 10-KSB. o Issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $3,564,514. As of March 18, 2005, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
computed by reference to the price at which the stock was recently sold was $3,404,948. Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act: Yes þ No o As of March 18, 2005, there were 14,197,120 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding. Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o No þ




---



Table of Contents PagePART I
    
    
    1ITEM 1.BUSINESS
    
    
    1ITEM 2.PROPERTY
    
    
    7ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
    
    
    7ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE BY SECURITY HOLDERS
    
    
    12PART II
    
    
    12ITEM 5.MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, COMPANY PURCHASES OF EQUITY AND SECURITIES
    
    
    12ITEM 6.MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
    
    
    14ITEM 7.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    
    
    27ITEM 8.CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
    
    
    48ITEM 8A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
    
    
    48ITEM 8B.OTHER INFORMATION
    
    
    49PART III
    
    
    50ITEM 9. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
    
    
    50ITEM 10.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
    
    
    52ITEM 11.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
    
    
    55ITEM 12.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
    
    
    57ITEM 13.EXHIBITS LIST AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
    
    
    57ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
    
    
    58Ex-3.2.1 Amendment to BylawsEx-10.19.1 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option AgreementEx-10.33 Scott Klein Employment AgreementEx-10.34 Form of Non-Plan Option AgreementEx-16.1 Letter from Salberg & Co.Ex-21.1 Subsidiaries of the RegistrantEx-31.1 Section 302 CEO CertificationEx-31.2 Section 302 CFO CertificationEx-32.1 Section 906 CEO CertificationEx-32.2 Section 906 CFO Certification
  Unless otherwise indicated in this Form 10-KSB, SinoFresh, the Company and similar terms
refer to SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and its subsidiary. SinoFresh is a registered trademark of
SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., and the SinoFresh name and logo are trademarks of the Company. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. When used in this annual report, the words may, will, expect, anticipate,
continue, estimate, project or intend and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements regarding events, conditions and financial trends in connection with the Companys
future plan of operations, business strategy, operating results and financial position. Discussions
containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Business and elsewhere in this report. Current
shareholders and prospective investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance. Such forward-looking statements by their nature involve
substantial risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Companys control, and actual
results for future periods could differ materially from those discussed in this annual report,
depending on a variety of important factors, among which are the Companys ability to implement its
business strategy, its ability to compete with major established companies, the outcome of
litigation, its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, its ability to obtain financing,
its ability to continue as a going concern, and other risks some of which are described under Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this report and which may also be described from time to time in future
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements contained in this
report speak only as of the date of this report. Future events and actual results could differ
materially from the forward-looking statements. You should read this report completely and with
the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what the Company
expects. The Company will not update forward-looking statements even though its situation may
change in the future. i




---



##### Table of Contents



PART I 
 ITEM 1. BUSINESS Company History Our predecessor, SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Delaware corporation (SinoFresh-Delaware),
was formed on October 15, 2002. It acquired certain assets of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc., an
Alabama corporation, effective November 15, 2002. In September 2003, we acquired
SinoFresh-Delaware by merger of SinoFresh-Delaware into our wholly-owned subsidiary, SinoFresh
Acquisition Corp., a Florida corporation, which is now our operating subsidiary bearing the name
SinoFresh Corporation. As a result of the merger, the former shareholders of SinoFresh-Delaware
obtained a majority ownership and voting control of our outstanding capital stock. Further, a
majority of the former officers and directors of SinoFresh-Delaware also obtained management
control of our company. Prior to our acquiring SinoFresh-Delaware, we operated as e-Book Network, Inc. and sold books
over the Internet. e-Book was originally a division of e-Miracle, Inc. e-Miracle, Inc. was
incorporated in July 1999 and was an online service provider and Internet shopping mall developer.
Due to under-capitalization and credit problems, e-Miracle filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceeding
in the United States Bankruptcy Court. We were a division of e-Miracle when e-Miracle filed
bankruptcy. Subsequently, we incorporated as a Florida corporation pursuant to and in accordance
with the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization. The Companys corporate headquarters are located at 516 Paul Morris Drive, Englewood, Florida
34223. Our website address is http://www.sinofresh.com. The Company and its Business OVERVIEW We are a pharmaceutical company engaged in the research, development and marketing of novel
therapies to treat inflammatory and infectious diseases and disorders of the upper respiratory
system. We distributed SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care, our first commercial product, in a limited
geographical area in Florida until May 2003 at which time we entered into an agreement with a
national marketing firm to obtain national distribution of our nasal product through various
national drugstores and grocery store chains. In 2003 and 2004, all of our revenues were derived from the sale of our SinoFresh Nasal &
Sinus Care product in the United States. The principal outlets for this product currently include
over 20,000 national drug and food chain stores, mainly Wal-Mart, CVS, Osco Drug, Publix Super
Markets, Rite Aid, Sav-on Drugs and Walgreens. In 2005, we plan to expand our retail distribution
network to include the remainder of the chain stores we are already servicing, other national food
and drug chain stores and a significant number of independent pharmacies which we are endeavoring
to reach through master brokers. While the Company will focus on marketing its product in the Western Hemisphere, it intends to
sell and distribute its products through joint ventures, partnerships and strategic relationships
throughout the world. Distribution abroad may involve direct shipments, foreign-based
manufacturing, and licensing. Charles Fust, the inventor of the SinoFresh products, transferred
to the Company his three U.S. patents issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office for the
Companys proprietary composition for freshening the nostrils and sinus cavities. He has also
transferred to the Company various foreign patents and patent applications relating to that proprietary
composition. The Company also has a patent pending on a new proprietary over-the-counter (OTC)
product for the treatment of otitis. Currently, the Company has under development several
promising new drugs for upper respiratory disorders and related diseases. The Companys nasal product has been proven to be effective in killing molds and bacteria that
colonize in the nose, throat and sinuses causing non-allergic reactions and symptoms of sinusitis.
Most OTC drug products in the sinus category today (primarily antihistamines and decongestants)
treat the symptoms rather than the causes of 1




---



##### Table of Contents



sinusitis, a disease that newer developments in the science have determined to be a
non-allergic reaction to a buildup of molds and bacteria in the nostrils and sinus cavities. As financial resources become available, the Company plans to establish the protocols and file
an Investigative New Drug (IND) application with the FDA geared toward the use of antiseptic
therapies in the upper respiratory system and to undertake the clinical studies necessary for the
reclassification and FDA approval of SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care to a New Drug Application (NDA)
approved product for the OTC market. Management believes that this new classification would set
SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care and future products apart from the competition as the only
FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of various upper respiratory diseases and disorders such as
chronic sinusitis in the OTC drug category. According to reports from the Center for Disease
Control, approximately 37 million Americans suffer from the debilitating effects of chronic
sinusitis. Because drugs can be dangerous, the government tightly regulates the production and
distribution of drug products. New drugs must be approved by the FDA, which also requires and
regulates pre-approval testing. Animal testing usually precedes clinical trials: testing in humans
afflicted with a particular medical condition. Phase I (safety testing in healthy human beings),
Phase II (proof of concept), and Phase III trials (large population, pivotal) must be successfully
completed before a NDA can be filed with the FDA. The average time from application to approval is
currently more than 12 months for routine drugs, but can extend to several years in some cases. The
FDA Modernization Act of 1997 considerably streamlined the review process for new drugs, and
allocated user fees collected from drug manufacturers to provide additional resources for the
review process. Since clinical trials may themselves last several years, the entire drug
development process may take a very long time (while the patent protection is already being
diminished), with only a small percentage of the initial candidate drugs surviving the testing and
approval processes. On the average, the industry claims that discovering and developing a new drug
takes 12 to 15 years and costs $500 million. Most new drugs appear first in prescription form, but
some may eventually be available over the counter, if long experience shows them to be safe to use
without medical supervision. Once a drug has been approved, the FDA requires extensive monitoring
by the manufacturers, recognizing that adverse effects may only appear once a drug is in general
use by a large number of people. During 2005, we plan to launch our first line extension since the role out of our flagship
nasal product. SinoFresh Daily Throat Spray is a unique antiseptic throat spray that offers many
consumer distinctions over the competition, making it a natural fit in our growing family of
SinoFresh products. The product will be the only one in its category to be antiseptic, sugar
(contains Xylitol ) and alcohol free, making it popular with the dental and Ear, Nose and Throat
physician communities. On December 7, 2004, we received financing in the amount of $1,830,000 through the sale of
two-year 6% senior secured convertible debentures and warrants to purchase 1,983,645 shares of our
common stock in a private placement (including warrants to our placement agent). The financing was
arranged primarily to support our 2005 marketing and media plan. The plan features entertainer Ed
McMahon, himself a longtime sinus sufferer, in a variety of promotional vehicles including national
cable television commercials, radio advertising, and personal appearances at healthcare industry
events. Additionally, the funds were used to pay off our then senior secured creditor and will be
used for general corporate purposes. PRODUCTS OVER-THE-COUNTER DRUG PRODUCTS SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care is an antiseptic, FDA registered product specially formulated to
kill mold and bacteria, and cleanse and freshen the nose by washing away the bacteria colonizing in
these membranes. SinoFresh Daily Throat Spray (which the Company plans to launch in mid 2005) is
an antiseptic product that kills mold and bacteria colonizing in the mouth and back of the throat.
Mold and bacteria have been scientifically proven to be at the root cause of many sinus and
asthma-related conditions, and are the focus of many sick building syndrome studies. Test marketing of the SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care product commenced in June 2002 in a
limited test area in southwest Florida culminating in the national launch of that product in May
2003 when the Company began 2




---



##### Table of Contents



shipping supplies to national retail drug and food chain stores across the United States.
SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care retails for approximately $15.99 for a 1-fluid ounce bottle
(approximately a 30 day supply). The SinoFresh brand product has been formulated to provide symptomatic relief for chronic
sinusitis and other sinus-related conditions. This formulation includes .05% Cetylpyridinium
Chloride (CPC) which is the active ingredient, aromatics, and other excipients. The product is
designed to kill bacteria on contact. CPC has a 55-year history of safety and efficacy, and is an
active ingredient in many popular drug products. ETHICAL PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS In September 2003, the Company expanded its Medical Advisory Board to include eminent
professionals from the fields of medicine, medical and clinical research, and regulatory affairs in
order to better position the Company to diversify into the OTC drug market and to ensure the safe
and effective distribution of important new products currently under development. In addition, the
Company may develop new drugs in the prescription drug category. The Company has enlarged its
strategy to seek approval as a NDA on the SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care product, which is currently
under the FDA monograph system and, further, to pursue NDA approval on future products. Upon
completion of the internal protocol, the Company plans to obtain FDA approval on guidelines for
clinical studies. Assuming the efficacy of the Companys clinical studies, management would seek
FDA approval of the new products as a NDA, which is required if we elect to pursue the prescription
drug route. The Company is at the implementation stage of what is expected to be a lengthy process to
develop several of its investigative new drug activities into commercialized NDA products. The
pre-clinical development, clinical trials, chemistry and manufacturing controls, and production and
marketing of new NDA drug products will be subject to federal and state regulation in the United
States and other countries. Obtaining FDA regulatory approval for these pharmaceutical products
will require substantial resources and may take several years. The length of this process will
depend upon the method of administration, pharmaceutical complexity, novelty of the product, the
nature of the disease or ailment, and the indications to be treated. If the Company is not granted
regulatory approval for these new products in a timely manner, or if the patents sought are not
granted, or if the patents granted are subsequently challenged, these events could have a material
effect on the business and financial conditions of the Company. Management believes that the full
exploitation of its products potential is dependent on eventually obtaining NDA clearance, which
would allow SinoFresh to make extended label claims for its products. The strength of the Companys patent position is important to the long-term success of the
Company. There can be no assurance that these patents and the patent applications made in the
United States and abroad will effectively protect the Companys products from infringement or from
duplication by others. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development activities are identified and planned by in-house staff members.
Because of limited personnel and facility resources, the Company relies primarily on external
sources for conducting its research and development activities. Research and development costs for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $236,000 and $185,000, respectively.
The Company has a pipeline of several new products based on its current product platform.
Substantial future research and development costs are anticipated as the Company plans to establish
the protocols and file an Investigative New Drug (IND) application with the FDA geared toward the
use of antiseptic therapies in the upper respiratory system and to undertake the clinical studies
necessary for the reclassification and FDA approval of SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care to a New Drug
Application (NDA) approved product for the OTC market. Additionally, extensive clinical and
developmental testing is anticipated in connection with the Companys development of new OTC and
ethical drug products related to the treatment of various upper respiratory disorders and related
diseases. Many of these new products are expected to lead to an application for new patents in the
United States as well as abroad. In addition, the Company is planning extensive research and
development aimed at increasing the number of on-label claims it may include on its OTC products
and further documenting the efficacy of these products. The Company is pursuing partnering and
collaborative arrangements with several additional prominent organizations. Such arrangements are
being sought in order to further enhance the Companys R&D efforts. 3




---



##### Table of Contents



REGULATORY MATTERS The Companys business is subject to federal and state laws and regulations adopted for the
health and safety of consumers and users of its products. The Companys SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus
Care product is FDA registered and subject to regulation by various federal, state and foreign
agencies, and the Company is subject to regulatory and legislative changes that can affect the
economics of both the Company and the industry by requiring changes in operating practices and
protocols or by influencing the demand for, and the costs of, production and distribution of
SinoFresh products. Management believes that the Company is in compliance with all applicable
laws, regulations and standards currently in effect, including the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of
1938 and amendments thereto. Although it is possible that the future results of operations could be
affected by the future costs of compliance, the Companys management believes that future costs of
compliance will not have a material adverse effect on either the Companys financial position or
competitive position. The costs and length of time required to develop and obtain regulatory (and patent) approval
for future products and extensions of current products are subject to several uncertainties and
risks, among them, legal, administrative and regulatory risks, inflation, market conditions,
consumer demand, and the Companys ability to protect its patents against infringement and its
products against duplication by others. FDA CLASSIFICATION OF DRUG PRODUCTS Products that are labeled and marketed as drug products are approved and regulated by the FDA.
Implied in this registration is the adherence to very strict quality standards known as current
Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs) which govern the manufacture of these products. Entry into this category of drugs is usually accomplished by one of two routes. The first and
least burdensome process is through the OTC drug monograph system, which is based on a
pharmacology/physiology category. This allows the Company to make only claims related to the
pharmacology of the active ingredients. The next and more arduous process is the NDA system, which is based on the treatment/
prevention of a disease or condition. This allows the Company to make treatment or prevention
claims related to a disease or condition. Also required for this process is the successful
completion of two controlled clinical studies. Currently, SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care is encompassed in the monograph system which provides
regulatory cover for marketing the product. It is the intent of the Company to take the next step
and pursue a NDA, which will secure the product in being viewed as a stand alone drug product with
the FDA. There is no assurance that NDA classification will be achieved. PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS The Company currently owns three U.S. patents under which it has the exclusive right to
manufacture, market and distribute in the United States a proprietary composition for freshening
the nostrils and sinus cavities. United States Patent No. 5,785,988 pertains to a composition for
freshening [the] nostrils and sinus cavities, Patent No. 6,083,525 pertains to a composition for
freshening sinus cavities including a carrier for a masking agent that conceals and eliminates
odors emanating from the sinus cavities, and further including an anti-septic or anti-infective
constituent. Patent No. 6,344,210 is a continuation-in-part patent related to the freshening of
the sinus cavities. United States Patent: No. 5,785,988 was issued July 28, 1998, No. 6,083,525 was issued July 4,
2000, and No. 6,344,210 was issued February 5, 2002 to Charles Fust, the principal of SinoFresh
Laboratories, Inc., who subsequently assigned those patents to the Company. All of the assignments
of the SinoFresh patents to the Company are recorded and filed with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. The
Company has patents or patent applications pending for the Company's proprietary
composition in Canada and various other foreigh countries
located in Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America and the Middle
East. 4




---



##### Table of Contents



The Company currently has trademark rights and/or trademark registrations on the SINO-FRESH
and SinoFresh names in the United States and several foreign countries. The Company is currently
in the process of filing an application under the Madrid Protocol, which will effect a trademark in
61 countries subscribing to the Madrid Protocol. PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION AND CUSTOMERS The Companys products are marketed and sold through various brokers, distributors and
independent sales representatives. The Company has a master broker arrangement with National In
Store Marketing, Inc. (NIS), under a three-year agreement. The Company pays commissions based on
sales volumes. The Companys first commercial product, SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care, was launched nationally
in May 2003 and is retailed through numerous food and chain drug stores throughout the United
States, including Wal-Mart, CVS, Osco Drug, Publix Super Markets, Rite Aid, Sav-on Drugs and
Walgreens. In 2005, through the Companys independent brokers and distributors, the Company plans
to expand its retail distribution network to other food and drug chain stores and independent
pharmacies as well as the chain stores the Company is currently servicing. In addition, the
Company will explore the possibilities of developing alliances with other entities for the purpose
of manufacturing, distributing, marketing and regulatory compliance of its products in certain
foreign countries. The Companys primary customers in 2004 were Walgreens, Wal-Mart, CVS, Publix Super Markets
and Rite Aid of which three accounted for more than seventy percent of the Companys annual sales
volume in 2004. The Company had four customers that accounted for over ninety percent of net
accounts receivable at December 31, 2004. The loss of any one of these chains as a customer could
adversely impact the Companys revenue. COMPETITION The Company competes in the marketplace with other suppliers of remedies in the cold and sinus
category of OTC medicines. These suppliers range in size and financial strength from small startup
companies to large, well-heeled companies such as GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Novartis, all of
which have significantly greater financial resources and market presence than the Company.
Nevertheless, management believes that SinoFreshs products will be able to compete effectively in
its market. The Company believes that it offers a significant advantage over many of its
competitors in the OTC cold and sinus market, as many current products tend to provide only
symptomatic relief. Management also believes that the acceptance of the SinoFresh brand, which is
being distributed to more than 20,000 stores nationwide, will continue to grow as other major food
and grocery chains are contracted and as distribution and merchandising to the 45,000 independent
food and drug stores across the United States takes hold. However, the Company believes that its ability to compete will depend upon a number of factors
including: price, quality, availability, reliability, efficiency, brand recognition, and delivery.
The price of SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care sits atop its category for its ability to treat causes
of disorders rather than just symptoms, which, in managements opinion, is a point of distinction
and differentiation for the SinoFresh brand.  A.
    Products offering direct competition to the current SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus
Care brand include: Afrin, Blairex Simply Saline Nasal Spray, Entsol Nasal Spray, Neil
Med Nasal Spray, Nose Better Nasal Spray, Ocean Nasal Spray, Ponaris Nasal Spray, and
Zicam, among others.B.
    Products offering indirect competition to the present SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus
Care brand, but direct competition to the planned NDA-approved product, include the Rx
products such as: Allegra, Beconase, Flonase, Nasalide, Nasonex and Rhinocort. The Companys advertising and promotional campaigns position the nasal product as a root cause
solution and defense against sinus disorders in contradistinction to antihistamines, decongestants,
steroids, and surgery. Management believes that in time and as its message takes hold, SinoFresh
will rise to the top of the category list. 5




---



##### Table of Contents



EMPLOYEES As of February 28, 2005, the Company has twelve (12) full-time equivalent employees. The
Company has an employment agreement with Charles A. Fust, its Chief Executive Officer (CEO). None
of the Companys employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, the Company engages independent contractors to fulfill current sales and
marketing needs. Over the next twelve months, the Company plans on hiring additional employees to
fulfill its staffing requirements as the need arises due to growth and expansion of the Company and
its products and services. SUPPLIERS The Company currently uses a single manufacturer, AccuMed, a third party (contract)
manufacturer, and FDA approved manufacturing facility to manufacture its products. The Company
entered into an agreement with AccuMed, which expires in December 2005, for the production of up to
90,000 units of product per day. Should this relationship for any reason terminate or be
discontinued, the Company has a contingency plan for the alternative manufacturing of its products.
However, any such termination may cause a temporary delay in production until the replacement
facility can meet the Companys production requirements. AccuMed also produces certain health care
products for other pharmaceutical companies and distributors including Walgreens and Wal-Mart. Raw materials used in the production of the SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care product and the
SinoFresh Daily Throat Spray product are readily available from numerous sources. Currently,
these raw materials are being procured from two main vendors in order to secure purchasing
economies of scale. Should any vendor be unable or unwilling to supply the Companys manufacturer
with an ingredient, other sources have been identified. However, any situation where the vendor is
not able to supply the contract manufacturer with the ingredients may result in a temporary delay
in production until replacement supplies are obtained to meet the Companys production
requirements. SALES AND MARKETING SinoFresh is aided in its sales and marketing efforts through a master broker arrangement with
National In Store Marketing, Inc. (NIS). NIS provides the Company with sales support in retail
accounts throughout the United States and Canada and serves as the Companys exclusive master
broker within those territories. The Company pays NIS a percentage of net revenue for all
shipments that occur within the U.S with the exception of certain house accounts and certain
distribution channels. Management believes that this arrangement is cost-effective and, as such,
saves valuable resources that can otherwise be expended in its marketing and product branding
efforts. The NIS agreement commenced on March 1, 2003 and expires on March 2, 2006, unless renewed
by NIS under terms agreed to with the Company prior to the Company seeking an alternative provider
of the services provided by NIS. However, the Company retained the right to terminate in
accordance with the contract buy-out provisions contained in the agreement with NIS. The Company anticipates that drug stores will continue to provide a significant portion of its
revenue from product sales. We are focusing our sales efforts on the large chain drugstore
companies. Small local pharmacies are generally serviced through large national independent
distributors. There are more than 45,000 pharmacies in the U.S. of which approximately 25,000 are
independents. Large grocery store chains are also targeted as they account for more than 7,000
outlets. The Company estimates that it is currently represented in more than 20,000 retail
outlets. In October 2004, SinoFresh entered into an agreement with BestBet Media Group, Inc. to provide
the services of nationally known entertainer Ed McMahon for purposes of endorsing and promoting
SinoFresh products. Mr. McMahon, a long time sinus distress
sufferer, will be featured primarily in television commercials and print advertisements for the Companys products and will also make
certain appearances at trade shows and other related events. The term of this agreement is for one
year and is renewed automatically for two additional one year periods unless terminated by either
party with at least 90 days written notice prior to the expiration of the then current term. 6




---



##### Table of Contents



In December, 2004, the Company signed an agreement with G.S. Schwartz & Co., Inc., a full
service public relations agency based in New York City with expertise in the consumer goods,
pharmaceutical, and healthcare industries. G.S. Schwartz will provide media relations services, and
will coordinate publicity events and special projects designed to increase brand exposure and
identity, and to generate awareness of product benefits. In February, 2005, the Company signed an agreement with AdSouth Partners, Inc., a full-service
marketing organization specializing in direct to retail advertising to provide a broad range of
integrated marketing services including print design and media purchasing. The initial term of the
agreement ends December 31, 2005 and automatically renews for additional six month terms unless
terminated by either party with at least 60 days written notice prior to the expiration of the then
current term. SinoFresh is currently exploring the possibility of launching the SinoFresh brand in markets
in Europe, Asia and elsewhere around the world through licensing arrangements with joint ventures
or partnerships. 
 ITEM 2. PROPERTY The Companys corporate offices are located at 516 Paul Morris Drive, Englewood, Florida
34223. This property, with an area of approximately 10,000 square feet of office and warehouse
space, is leased from an entity owned by Charles Fust, the principal shareholder and an officer and
director of the Company, and P. Robert DuPont, a shareholder and an officer and director of the
Company. Base lease payments are $5,998 per month, plus sales tax, under the terms of a five-year
renewable lease. In addition, the Company is responsible for payment of real estate taxes on the
property, association maintenance fees and assessments, insurance, and all non-exterior maintenance
and repairs on the property. The Company believes that the existing facility will adequately meet
its needs for now and the foreseeable future. 
 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Certain shareholders of SinoFresh, including Charles Fust, Stacey Maloney-Fust and P. Robert
DuPont who are also officers and directors of SinoFresh, voted by written consent to remove
Messrs. Bannon and Otto as directors and officers of SinoFresh (which attempt was unsuccessful as
discussed below). The decision to remove Messrs. Bannon and Otto was made after it became
apparent that they were not investigating certain improprieties that may have occurred as a result
of actions of Sargon Capital, Inc. (Sargon) and Andrew Badolato, a former officer and director of
SinoFreshs predecessor and a consultant to SinoFresh. (Upon the request of Messrs. Fust, DuPont
and Ms. Maloney-Fust, the Board earlier had formed a committee comprised of Messrs. Otto, Bannon
and DuPont to investigate the matters regarding Sargon Capital, Inc. and Andrew Badolato.) Messrs.
Bannon and Otto were notified by letter dated January 30, 2004 that they had been removed as
directors. On February 9, 2004, Messrs. Fust, DuPont, Otto, Bannon and Ms. Maloney-Fust received a
letter from an attorney representing Andrew Badolato, Sargon Capital, Inc. and four shareholders
(including Michael Hawkins, a director or other affiliate of Sargon Capital, Inc.) alleging various
breaches of fiduciary duty and self-dealing purportedly committed by Messrs. Fust, DuPont and Ms.
Maloney-Fust, and demanding an investigation and a report within 30 days. On February 20, 2004, a law suit was filed in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of
Florida, Ft. Myers Division, Case No. 04-CV-95-FTM-29 SPC, styled Hawkins, et al. vs. Charles Fust,
et al., and an amended complaint was filed on March 3, 2004 which merely changed allegations
directed toward the location where the action may be heard and noted that SinoFresh is a Florida
corporation. This legal proceeding was moved to the U.S. District Court located in Tampa, Florida.
The plaintiffs include Stephen Bannon and David Otto, directors of SinoFresh, as well as other
purported shareholders of SinoFresh. The defendants are Charles Fust, Stacey Maloney -Fust, P.
Robert DuPont, Russell R. Lee, III (the companys former CFO), and SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. The
complaint alleges that it is a class action suit claiming federal securities law violations, breach
of fiduciary duty, rescission of certain acts and contracts of SinoFresh, and an accounting and
constructive trust, being brought by the lead plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all persons in
a class (other than the defendants) who purchased SinoFreshs publicly traded shares between
January 1, 2003 and February 19, 2004; however, the lawsuit was not certified as a class action
suit. The complaint essentially contained the same allegations as in the above-described February
9, 2004 demand letter. 7




---



##### Table of Contents



In June 2004, the plaintiffs filed a corrected second amended complaint in the U.S. District
Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Case No. 8:04-CV-490-T-30MSS. This complaint
notes SinoFresh as a nominal defendant and adds SinoFreshs corporate counsel as additional
defendants (seeking compensatory damages, including reimbursement of legal fees paid by SinoFresh).
The complaint alleges that it is a derivative suit, includes the same allegations as in the
original complaint, and also alleges, among other things, inadequate disclosure by the defendants
in SEC filings regarding related party transactions and regarding Mr. Fusts beneficial ownership
(wherein Mr. Fust reported ownership of the 1,000,000 shares Crown IV Holdings portends to own),
all for the alleged purpose of the defendants maintaining control of SinoFresh. In this complaint
the plaintiffs request, among other things, that the Court appoint a special monitor during the
pendency of the litigation with authority to conduct investigations and issue a report to the
Court; that the Court enjoin the defendant directors from committing certain violations of Federal
securities laws, and from taking certain actions, including using corporate funds for the defense
of the directors in the suit, conducting transactions in SinoFreshs stock and soliciting proxies
for a 2004 annual meeting. In June 2004, SinoFresh filed a motion with the Court (a) requesting the Court to appoint an
independent person to make a good faith determination, after conducting a reasonable investigation,
as to whether it is in the best interests of SinoFresh to maintain the shareholder derivative suit,
and (b) requesting a stay of all proceedings in the case until the results of the investigation are
provided to the Court. The interim stay was granted and the Court granted the motion for
appointment of an independent investigator. The independent investigator commenced his
investigation in September 2004 and was due to report back to the Court no later than February 15,
2005. However, the Court subsequently granted a motion to extend the due date for the report to
May 30, 2005. The complaint alleges, among other things, the following: (a) that Mr. Fust has not transferred foreign patents he holds to two foreign entities related
to SinoFresh through common ownership; (b) breach of fiduciary duty and self dealing by the individual defendants, including (i) the
payment of legal fees in connection with litigation involving SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. for
which SinoFresh Laboratories agreed to indemnify SinoFresh, (ii) payment of lease obligations on a
lease entered into by SinoFresh Laboratories and Charles Fust; (iii) failure to disclose to the
directors that SinoFreshs headquarters are owned by an entity controlled by Charles Fust and P.
Robert DuPont; (iv) the payment of rent to Stacey Maloney-Fust for a condominium she owned; (v) the
granting of options to insiders; (vi) entering into an employment agreement with Stacey
Maloney-Fust without board approval; (vii) the objection by Mr. Lee of Messrs. Bannon and Otto
(whom the plaintiffs allege constituted the Companys audit committee) having direct oversight over
the auditor and having the auditor report directly to Messrs. Bannon and Otto, and instead having
the auditor report to Mr. Lee; (viii) removing Messrs. Bannon and Otto as directors in order to
prevent them from bringing the foregoing to the attention of the auditor; (c) that there were certain enumerated defects with the Schedule 14C Information Statement
filed with the SEC; (d) that the Companys financial statements and the materials provided to the public, to the
shareholders and to the SEC do not properly reflect the Companys true financial condition, do not
reflect the foreign patents are not held by two foreign entities and do not reflect a fair
statement of the interim reporting periods of January 1 through September 30, 1993 [sic]. (The
plaintiffs also allege that during this time frame, the defendants failed to file financial
statements which conform to GAAP such that the financial statements will be presumably misleading
and inaccurate.) While SinoFresh does not wish to present all of the defenses since the matters referenced
above are in litigation, SinoFresh desires to set forth certain information addressing the above
allegations. The
foreign patents.At one time it was intended that two foreign
entities, related by common ownership, distribute SinoFresh's
products in certian foreign markets, and in connection therewith,
those foreign entities would eventually hold certain foreign patents
for SinoFresh's proprietary composition.  However, Mr. Fust and
certain 8




---



##### Table of Contents



other members of management subsequently determined that it was in the best interests of
SinoFresh and its shareholders to instead have the foreign
patents held by SinoFresh with a view to
entering into joint ventures or other arrangements with independent third parties for the
distribution of SinoFreshs products in foreign markets. SinoFresh believes that the investors in
the foreign entities are primarily shareholders in SinoFresh, but certain parties may have sold
interests in the foreign entities to other investors. SinoFresh may have exposure to these other
investors in the two foreign entities as a result of this shift in its business plan with respect
to the foreign patents and foreign distribution of its products. Breach offiduciary duty and self dealing.In connection with the asset acquisition,
litigation was threatened by a former employee of SinoFresh Laboratories who objected to the
consideration to which she was entitled in connection with the asset acquisition. That was a
matter of which the board was aware and settlement was reached with the former employee with full
knowledge and approval of the full board. Another shareholder of SinoFresh Laboratories also objected to the terms of the asset
acquisition between SinoFresh Laboratories and SinoFresh-Delaware and, accordingly filed a
complaint against SinoFresh Laboratories. SinoFresh Laboratories agreed to indemnify
SinoFresh-Delaware for undisclosed/unassumed liabilities in excess of $10,000 as part of the asset
purchase agreement between SinoFresh Laboratories and SinoFresh  Delaware. In addition, under the
terms of the asset purchase agreement, SinoFresh-Delaware agreed to fund up to $50,000 in defense
of this matter. Because the complaint arose out of the asset acquisition orchestrated by
SinoFresh-Delaware, SinoFresh has incurred legal fees of approximately $76,000 in connection with
the defense by SinoFresh Laboratories through December 31, 2003. Management believes that at all
times Andrew Badolato (an officer and director of SinoFresh  Delaware) and the other board members
were aware of the litigation costs being incurred by the Company. During 2003, SinoFresh (and its non-public predecessor) paid approximately $30,000 for a lease
obligation entered into by SinoFresh Laboratories and Charles Fust in Ft. Lauderdale, which lease
terminated in October 2003. Management believes that these payments benefited SinoFresh and
prevented it from becoming sued as a result of SinoFresh-Delaware acquiring all of the assets of
SinoFresh Laboratories without leaving sufficient assets for SinoFresh Laboratories to pay its
obligations. In addition, management believes that at all times Andrew Badolato (an officer and
director of SinoFresh-Delaware) and the other board members were aware of this lease and the
payments being made thereon. SinoFresh leases its headquarters from an entity owned by two of its officers and directors,
which is disclosed in Note 13 to the Companys financial statements that were filed by the Company
on Form 8-K/A on November 17, 2003. SinoFresh paid, on a month-to-month basis, rent of $1,250 a month to Stacey Maloney-Fust for a
condominium apartment which is not used by Ms. Maloney-Fust, but which SinoFresh used as corporate
housing. This was in lieu of reimbursing an independent contractor (who provided services to
SinoFresh) living in those quarters for hotel accommodations. SinoFreshs relationship with the
independent contractor terminated and thus these payments ceased in July 2004. SinoFreshs predecessors had committed in writing or promised to certain employees and
independent contractors options or shares in SinoFresh-Delaware for a total of approximately
500,000 shares. Those individuals were left off of a list of individuals to whom options were
granted by written consent of the full board dated November 13, 2003. Included in that option list
were 890,000 options for SinoFresh Management, LLC, a company controlled by Stephen Bannon and
Charles Fust, but of which the full board (including Mr. Fust) was not apprised. Subsequent to the
attempted removal of Messrs. Bannon and Otto, the remaining board members revised the option list,
deleting SinoFresh Management, LLCs option grant as void, and adding 200,000 options for Russell
Lee, SinoFreshs former CFO, pursuant to an offer of employment from the Company dated August 25,
2003, and 289,625 options for approximately 13 independent contractors and one employee (P. Robert
DuPont, an officer and director, and recipient of 21,000 of those options), who had contributed
services to SinoFresh Laboratories, without other compensation, in connection with the development
of SinoFreshs products. The compensation committee ratified those actions in April 2004 and
management takes the position that the LLCs options were void for reasons of non-disclosure,
improper conflicts of interest, lack of consideration and specific prohibition under the stock 9




---



##### Table of Contents



option plan against awarding options to non-employee directors. The compensation committees
action was later ratified by majority vote of the board of directors. SinoFresh  Delaware and Stacey Maloney-Fust did execute an employment agreement dated as of
September 1, 2003, pursuant to the terms of an employment offer letter delivered to her by Mr.
Andrew Badolato, at that time an officer and a director of Sino-Fresh Delaware. That employment
agreement has since been renounced and cancelled as of September 1, 2003. However, Ms.
Maloney-Fust, an employee of SinoFresh, was paid a salary of $48,000 per year (which amount is the
same as provided in the offer letter as well as the cancelled employment agreement). Further, the
only option she has been granted is an option for 50,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise
price of $1.00 per share, which option was approved by all board members by written consent dated
November 13, 2003, as of and effective September 1, 2003 (which option was also provided for in the
offer letter as well as the cancelled employment agreement). Ms. Maloney-Fust is currently
employed by the Company on a part-time basis and as such she is paid $29.00 per hour. Messrs. Bannon and Otto claim to comprise the audit committee. Although SinoFresh-Delaware
may have had an audit committee (comprised of just Mr. Otto before the merger), the board of
directors of SinoFresh never appointed an audit committee at a meeting or by written consent and
thus, the board of directors would be deemed the audit committee. On March 29, 2004, the board of
directors by majority vote appointed Messrs. Fust and DuPont and Ms. Maloney-Fust as the audit
committee. The plaintiffs in the complaint allege that Messrs. Bannon and Otto were removed as directors
to prevent them from bringing the allegations in the complaint to the attention of the SinoFreshs
auditor. Contrary to that claim, the first time that SinoFresh heard of any investigation by
Messrs. Bannon and Otto was after Messrs. Bannon and Otto had been informed that they had been
removed from the Board. By way of background, in October or November 2003, it had come to the
attention of Messrs. Fust, DuPont, Lee, and Ms. Maloney-Fust that there may have been certain
improprieties that occurred as a result of actions of Sargon Capital, Inc. and Andrew Badolato.
Their concerns were presented to Messrs. Bannon and Otto at a meeting and they were asked to
investigate. At subsequent meetings and discussions with Messrs. Bannon and Otto, it became
obvious to the other members of the board and Mr. Lee that no investigation was being made or that
it was being stalled. Thus, out of frustration with the inability to make any progress on these
matters, Mr. Fust sought removal of Messrs. Bannon and Otto from the board, who were originally
designated to be board members by Sargon. In connection with the attempted removal of Messrs. Bannon and Otto from the board, SinoFresh
filed a preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C with the SEC with a view toward filing
and sending a definitive Information Statement to shareholders of record once the SEC completed its
review of the Schedule 14C. The actions of the shareholders were challenged by Messrs. Otto and
Bannon and SinoFresh was unable to expeditiously get final clearance for the 14C Information
Statement. During the week of March 22, 2004, after discussion with the reviewing staff at the
SEC, it was determined that, under applicable SEC rules relating to Information Statements, the
corporate action (e.g., the effectiveness of the removal of the two directors) could not occur
until the 20th day after the mailing of a definitive information statement. Further, it was also
discovered during that time that there was a technical defect with the shareholders written
consents in that they were short sufficient votes to clearly constitute a majority of the issued
and outstanding voting stock. As a result, it was decided to retroactively reinstate Messrs.
Bannon and Otto to the board (until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or their earlier
removal or resignation). With respect to the allegations made regarding SinoFreshs financial statements, SinoFresh
believes that the Form 8-K/A (containing audited financial statements), the Form 10-QSB (containing
unaudited financial statements) (prepared by SinoFreshs former CFO, Steves Rodriguez, and which
were reviewed by David Otto, SinoFreshs counsel at the time, and the other members of the board of
directors), and the Form 10-KSB accurately reflect the financial position of SinoFresh at the time
of those reports. Management of SinoFresh investigated the complaint and believes the allegations in the
complaint to be blatantly incendiary, false and misleading. SinoFresh disagrees with the
allegations in the complaint and SinoFresh, on behalf of itself and its officers and directors,
intends to vigorously defend the suit.  10




---



##### Table of Contents



In March 2004, SinoFresh declared null and void two contracts entered into with Sargon
Capital, Inc., a shareholder and an affiliate of a former director and officer, to-wit: an
Investment Banking Services Agreement dated October 24, 2002, and a Financial Consulting Services
Agreement originally dated in November 2002 which monthly payments under this consulting agreement
approximate $8,000 with $96,000 due for the years 2003 and 2004, and $80,000 due for 2005. The
consulting agreement was revised September 8, 2003 extending the term to September 2006 and
increasing compensation to include 0.5% of gross revenue and 0.6% of net income before taxes,
interest and amortization. Sargon claimed that SinoFresh owes approximately $173,000 for these
services. In April 2004, a lawsuit was filed in Circuit Court for the 12th Judicial Circuit
in and for Sarasota County, Florida, styled Sargon Capital, Inc. and Andrew Badolato vs. SinoFresh
HealthCare, Inc., Charles Fust and John Hallman, Case No. 2004 CA3732SC. The complaint alleges a
breach of the financial consulting services agreement by failing to pay certain fees to Sargon
Capital, Inc. The complaint also alleges defamation of the principal of Sargon Capital, Inc. and a
civil conspiracy to prevent Sargon Capital, Inc. from doing business in the State of Florida.
SinoFresh believes that the agreements were improperly approved, were breached by Sargon, and are
illegal because of the lack of appropriate licensure of Sargon. SinoFresh, on behalf of itself and
its officers and directors, intends to vigorously defend the suit.  Management of SinoFresh believes that both of the above-described lawsuits are a backlash by
Andrew Badolato and/or Sargon Capital, Inc. against SinoFresh in connection with the attempted
removal of Stephen Bannon and David Otto as board members and as officers of SinoFresh. Mr.
Badolatos company, Sargon Capital, Inc., had been retained by SinoFreshs predecessor for
investment banking and consulting services. Over the course of Mr. Badolatos and Sargons
association with SinoFresh, current management came to believe that it was in the best interests of
SinoFresh and its shareholders to sever ties with Mr. Badolato and Sargon. Since Messrs. Bannon
and Otto became Board members as a result of their introduction to
the Company by Mr. Badolato, Mr. Fust and other shareholders
deemed it in SinoFreshs best
interests to attempt to remove them as directors and to seek substitute directors who were truly
independent from Mr. Badolato (and Sargon). Other Legal Proceedings A shareholder of SinoFreshs predecessor commenced an action against the predecessor
(SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc.), and certain of its former officers and directors, including Charles
Fust. In that action, the plaintiff is seeking recovery, through arbitration, of his investment of
$150,000. In addition, the plaintiff is seeking unspecified damages due to non-performance by
SinoFresh Labs of a consulting agreement entered into in January 2000. The agreement was for five
years at $24,000 annually, of which $23,000 was paid. Under the terms of the asset purchase
agreement between SinoFresh-Delaware and SinoFresh Labs, SinoFresh-Delaware agreed to reimburse
SinoFresh Labs up to $50,000 in costs of defending this action, which agreement was assumed by
SinoFresh as a result of the merger. This lawsuit is being vigorously defended, but no outcome or
resolution of the arbitration or lawsuit is definitive or ascertainable at this time. Also in April 2004, a lawsuit was filed against SinoFresh by Bryan W. Miller in the Circuit
Court of the 11th Judicial Court in and for Dade County, Florida, Civil Division Case
No. 04-7960 CA 30, alleging that SinoFresh breached an agreement by failing to pay fees for a
broker financing arrangement. The complaint seeks damages of $120,000 plus interest and attorneys
fees. Although SinoFresh denies the allegations a settlement was reached in January 2005 for
50,000 shares of SinoFresh common stock. From time to time, the Company is subjected to other litigation or proceedings in connection
with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant. There are no such pending legal proceedings
to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations. 11




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE BY SECURITY HOLDERS Not applicable. 
 PART II 
 ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, COMPANY PURCHASES OF EQUITY
               AND
SECURITIES Market Information The Companys common stock is traded in the Over-the-Counter market and is quoted on the
Electronic Bulletin Board (OTCBB) under the symbol SFSH. The following table represents the
range of the high and the low closing bid prices, as quoted on the OTCBB, for each fiscal quarter
for the last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. These quotations represent prices
between dealers, and may not include retail mark-ups, markdowns or commissions, and may not
necessarily represent actual transactions. On September 9, 2003, the Company announced the
acquisition of SinoFresh Health Care, Inc. by merger. Prior to that date, the Company had been
known as e-Book Network, Inc. Fiscal Quarter Ended
    
    Low
    
    
    HighDecember 31, 2004
    
    $
    0.55
    
    
    $
    1.00September 30, 2004
    
    $
    0.55
    
    
    $
    1.01June 30, 2004
    
    $
    0.85
    
    
    $
    1.80March 31, 2004
    
    $
    0.78
    
    
    $
    2.25December 31, 2003
    
    $
    1.70
    
    
    $
    4.50September 30, 2003
    
    $
    0.01
    
    
    $
    7.15June 30, 2003
    
    $
    0.01
    
    
    $
    0.01March 31, 2003
    
    $
    0.01
    
    
    $
    0.01
 On February 25, 2005, the Company estimates that there were approximately 705 record holders
of the Companys common stock. Dividends and Dividend Policy The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common or preferred stock during the last
two fiscal years and it does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The Company currently intends to retain any future earnings for reinvestment in the business. Any
future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and
will be dependent on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements
and other relevant factors. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities All unregistered sales of the Companys equity securities during fiscal 2004 were previously
reported in the Companys prior annual, quarterly and current reports filed with the SEC.
Therefore, those disclosures are not duplicated in this report. Equity Compensation Plan Information The following table summarizes share information about the Companys equity compensation
plans, including the Companys 2002 Stock Option Plan (the Plan) and non-plan equity compensation
agreements as of December 31, 2004. 12




---



##### Table of Contents



Number of Securities to
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number of Securitiesbe Issued Upon
    
    
    Weighted-Average
    
    
    Remaining AvailableExercise of
    
    
    Exercise Price of
    
    
    For Future IssuanceOutstanding Options,
    
    
    Outstanding Options,
    
    
    Under EquityPlan Category
    
    Warrants and Rights
    
    
    Warrants and Rights
    
    
    Compensation PlansEquity Compensation
Plans to Employees
Not Approved By
Shareholders
    
    
    1,304,750
    (1)
    
    $
    1.01
    
    
    
    1,695,250
    (2)Equity Compensation
Plans Not Approved
by Shareholders
    
    
    4,674,740
    (3)
    
    $
    2.13
    
    
    
    N/ATotal
    
    
    5,979,490
    
    
    $
    1.89
    
    
    
    1,695,250
   (1)
    
    Represents shares subject to outstanding options under the Plan.(2)
    
    Represents shares available for option grants under the Plan.(3)
    
    Represents non-plan options and warrants. Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders The Companys Compensation Committee together with the Companys Board of Directors currently
administers the Plan. The Plan provides for the grant of options (incentive and non-statutory) to
officers, employees, and independent contractors capable of contributing to the Companys
performance. The Company has reserved an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock for grants
under the Plan. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees eligible to receive them
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had
outstanding non-statutory options for 1,304,750 shares of the Companys common stock. These options
have a term of five years, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Plan
and applicable stock option agreements. The exercise prices of the outstanding options granted as
of December 31, 2004 range from $0.75 to $1.70 per share, and generally have scheduled vesting
except for options for 446,000 shares which vested immediately upon grant or were subsequently
accelerated. Upon expiration of unexercised options, the unpurchased shares subject to such options
will again be available for purposes of the Plan. During fiscal year 2004, the Company granted 555,000 plan options for the purchase of common
shares to employees and cancelled 81,250 options due to the termination of certain employees. The
new option grants expire in five years from the date of grant and have vesting schedules ranging
from immediate to incrementally over three years. Exercise prices for the new grants range from
$0.75 to $1.70. Additionally in 2004, 1,000 non plan options to purchase common shares were granted to an
independent consultant with immediate vesting. The Company had previously promised these options
to the consultant in connection with services provided to the Companys predecessors in the
development of the Companys product. The options have a five year term and an exercise price of
$1.50. The Company issued warrants to consultants and service providers in fiscal 2004 for a total of
670,000 shares of common stock, with exercise price ranging from $0.29 to $0.60 per share. The
warrants have terms of five years and vesting ranges from immediate to one year. The warrants
contain registration rights and the shares underlying these warrants are included for re-sale in a
registration statement on file with the SEC. The Company issued five year warrants to purchase 1,663,645 shares of common stock in
connection with the issuance of $1,830,000 in convertible debentures in December 2004. The
warrants were vested immediately and are exercisable at $0.60 per share. The warrants contain
registration rights and the shares underlying these warrants are included for re-sale in a
registration statement on file with the SEC. 13




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 6. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overview We are a pharmaceutical company engaged in the research, development and marketing of novel
therapies to treat inflammatory and infectious diseases of the upper respiratory system. We
distributed SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care, our first commercial product, in a limited geographical
area in Florida until May 2003 at which time we entered into an agreement with a national marketing
firm to obtain national distribution of our nasal product through various national drugstores and
grocery store chains. In 2003 and 2004, all of our revenues were derived from the sale of our SinoFresh Nasal &
Sinus Care product in the United States. The principal outlets for this product currently include
approximately 20,000 national drug and food chain stores, mainly Wal-Mart, CVS, Osco Drug, Publix
Super Markets, Rite Aid, Sav-on Drugs and Walgreens. In 2005, we plan to expand our retail
distribution network to include the remainder of the chain stores we are already servicing, other
national food and drug chain stores and a significant number of independent pharmacies which we are
endeavoring to reach through master brokers. On December 7, 2004, we secured financing in the amount of $1,830,000 through the sale of
two-year 6% senior secured convertible debentures and warrants to purchase 1,983,645 shares of our
common stock in a private placement (including warrants to our placement agent). The financing was
arranged primarily to support our 2005 marketing and media plan. The plan features entertainer Ed
McMahon, himself a longtime sinus sufferer, in a variety of promotional vehicles including national
cable television commercials, radio and print advertising, and personal appearances at healthcare
industry events. Additionally, the funds were used to pay off our then senior secured creditor and
will be used for general corporate purposes. Our predecessor, SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Delaware corporation (SinoFresh-Delaware),
was formed on October 15, 2002. It acquired certain assets of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc., an
Alabama corporation, effective November 15, 2002. In September 2003, we acquired
SinoFresh-Delaware by merger of SinoFresh-Delaware into our wholly-owned subsidiary, SinoFresh
Acquisition Corp., a Florida corporation, which is now our operating subsidiary bearing the name
SinoFresh Corporation. As a result of the merger, the former shareholders of SinoFresh-Delaware
obtained a majority ownership and voting control of our outstanding capital stock. Further, a
majority of the former officers and directors of SinoFresh-Delaware also obtained management
control of our company. Prior to our acquiring SinoFresh-Delaware, we operated as e-Book Network, Inc. and sold books
over the Internet. e-Book was originally a division of e-Miracle, Inc. e-Miracle, Inc. was
incorporated in July 1999 and was an online service provider and Internet shopping mall developer.
Due to under-capitalization and credit problems, e-Miracle filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceeding
in the United States Bankruptcy Court. We were a division of e-Miracle when e-Miracle filed
bankruptcy. Subsequently, we incorporated as a Florida corporation pursuant to and in accordance
with the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization. The following information and analysis of SinoFreshs financial condition and results of
operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of SinoFresh and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this report. Statements in this section and elsewhere in this report that are not
statements of historical or current fact constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements
are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause results to differ materially from
those projected, including, but not limited to, those set forth below under Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this report. Summary Financial Information The following table provides selected consolidated financial and operating data for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. 14




---



##### Table of Contents



Statement of Operations Data Year Ended
    
    
    Year EndedDecember 31,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Revenue, net
    
    $
    3,564,514
    
    
    $
    1,830,195Gross Profit
    
    
    2,621,891
    
    
    
    1,222,429Loss From Operations
    
    
    (2,448,651
    )
    
    
    (3,692,188
    )Net Loss
    
    
    (3,706,280
    )
    
    
    (3,769,315
    )
 Balance Sheet Data December 312004
    
    
    2003Current Assets
    
    $
    2,133,357
    
    
    $
    1,360,653Current Liabilities
    
    
    2,341,486
    
    
    
    1,957,208Total Assets
    
    
    7,366,621
    
    
    
    6,665,473Long Term Debt
    
    
    1,307,077
    
    
    
    83,851Stockholders Equity
    
    
    3,718,058
    
    
    
    4,624,414
 Results of Operations Revenues increased $1,734,319 from $1,830,195 to $3,564,514 for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2004, respectively. This increase is primarily attributable to the expanded distribution
network in 2004 compared to the prior year when national distribution was just beginning to
develop. Additionally, revenues for 2004 were affected by the recognition of approximately
$800,000 in pay-to-scan type sales. Shipments for these products took place primarily in the last
quarter of 2003, but the sales recognition process had not been completed until 2004. We are no
longer subject to these contingent sales arrangements. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $2,621,891 (or 74%), compared to
$1,222,429 (67%) for the year ended December 31, 2003. The percentage increase relates to co-op
charges which are offset against revenues. Co-op programs associated with large national retailers
were ramping up starting in late 2003 and therefore were higher in proportion to gross revenue in
2003 as opposed to 2004. There were also certain charges to costs of sales in 2003 for obsolete
inventory when the product was re-formulated as a result of a change in status from a health and
beauty aid category to an oral antiseptic monograph category. Salaries and related expenses increased $549,107, from $852,312 to $1,401,419 for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. This increase is a result of an increase in
personnel in order to support the growing organization. This growth has now stabilized and we
believe that we are properly staffed to support current sales volumes and expected volumes for
2005. Professional fees decreased $403,809, from $1,869,103 to $1,465,294 for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Professional fees in 2003 were significantly
attributable to costs associated with the reverse merger and consulting fees for services which
could not be performed by limited in-house resources. Professional fees in 2004 resulted primarily
from several lawsuits that SinoFresh is defending, accounting and legal fees associated with the
filing of certain SEC reports, including annual and quarterly reports, and an SB-2 registration
statement arising out of a recent round of debenture financing. Other general and administrative expenses remained relatively consistent at $560,657 and
$567,913 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. 15




---



##### Table of Contents



Marketing and advertising expenses were down slightly at $1,137,832 for 2004 as compared to
$1,196,939 in 2003. Marketing and advertising programs were reduced significantly in the latter
half of 2004 due to the lack of available funds. With the recent debenture financing completed in
late 2004, we anticipate increasing these expenses in 2005. Research and development expenditures reflect the costs associated with basic research,
product development, clinical testing, regulatory compliance, product enhancement and the
development of new products related and unrelated to our current product line. Research and
development costs were up $51,615 from $184,772 to $236,387 for the years ended December 31, 2003
and 2004, respectively. This increase reflects our efforts to expand the use of our current
product primarily through taking the steps necessary to open a New Drug Application with the Food
and Drug Administration and also reflects certain costs associated with the development of our next
product to be introduced in mid 2005. Future R&D activities will be greatly dependent on the
availability of capital for such programs. With the emergence of several lawsuits during 2004, management made a conscious decision to
defer certain research, development and marketing activities during the year ended December 31,
2004. Such activities may be accelerated in future quarters in order to make up for lost efforts. Depreciation and amortization totaled $250,834 and $261,697 for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2004, respectively. Total other expense was $1,257,629 in 2004 compared to other expense of $77,127 in 2003. The
increase of $1,180,502 is primarily related to costs associated with the convertible debenture
financing (recorded as interest expense) that took place in late 2004. There is still
approximately $977,645 in costs associated with this financing that will be amortized over the next
23 months. SinoFresh had a net loss of $3,706,280 ($0.28 per share) compared to a net loss of $3,769,315
($0.33 per share) for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively, as a result of the
factors discussed above. As of December 31, 2004, SinoFresh had total assets of $7.4 million, liabilities of $3.7
million and stockholders equity of $3.7 million. Working capital deficit totaled approximately
$208,000 as of December 31, 2004. Taxes At December 31, 2004, SinoFresh had a net operating loss carry forward (NOL) for federal
income tax purposes of approximately $9.4 million. The NOL expires at various dates through the
year 2024. Utilization of SinoFreshs net operating loss may be subject to substantial annual
limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and
similar state provisions. Such annual limitation could result in the expiration of the net
operating loss before full utilization. Inflation and Currency Fluctuation Inflation and currency fluctuations have not previously had a material impact upon the results
of operations and are not expected to have a material impact in the near future. Cash and Sources of Liquidity The Company historically has satisfied its operating cash requirements primarily through cash
flow from operations, from borrowings and from trade and equity financings. At December 31, 2004,
the Company had approximately $1,332,000 in cash on hand and approximately $229,000 in net accounts
receivable. In connection with a December 2004 financing, we issued $1,830,000 of senior secured 6%
convertible debentures which have a maturity date of December 5, 2006. The debentures are
convertible into 3,327,273 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.55 per share. The
debentures contain anti-dilution provisions under which the number of shares issuable upon
conversion of the debentures and the conversion price will be adjusted 16




---



##### Table of Contents



upon the sale by us of common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common
stock at prices below the then existing conversion price of the debenture, the occurrence of stock
splits, stock distributions, and other corporate events. We may, at our option, require the
conversion of all of the debentures into shares of common stock provided that the market price of
our common stock exceeds 300% of the conversion price of the debentures then in effect for at least
20 consecutive trading days and until delivery of a notice of mandatory conversion in accordance
with the terms of the debenture. Although the Company has recently secured financing through the issuance of these convertible
debentures, it may be necessary to pursue additional financing if operational objectives are not
met. There can be no assurance, however, that such financing will be available or will be available
on terms that are in the best interest of the Company. Critical Accounting Policies Revenue Recognition: The Company recognized revenue on its products in accordance with
the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements. Under these guidelines, SinoFresh deferred revenue recognition on
transactions if any of the following existed: persuasive evidence of an arrangement did not exist,
title had not transferred, product payment was contingent, the price was not fixed or determinable,
or payment was not reasonably assured. The Company accrued a provision for estimated returns
concurrent with revenue recognition. SinoFresh has adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 01-9, Accounting for Consideration
Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products) (EITF 01-9), which
became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Management has concluded that
EITF 01-9 is applicable to the accounting for its cooperative agreements with certain customers, as
the benefits received from consideration given to those customers are not sufficiently separable
from the revenue derived. Accordingly, all such cooperative expenses are recorded as reductions to
revenues. Asset Impairments: The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141, Business Combinations, (FAS 141) and Statement of Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142). FAS 141 requires business combinations completed
after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. It also specifies
the types of acquired intangible assets that are required to be recognized and reported separately
from goodwill. Under FAS 142, goodwill and other intangible assets (with indefinite lives) will not
be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company completed its
transitional impairment test of existing goodwill and patents as of December 31, 2004. This test
was performed internally and consisted of evaluating potential future revenue streams that could
realistically be realized as a result of the goodwill and patents of the Company. It was
determined by this test that these future revenue streams support the values previously assigned to
these assets. Therefore, no impairment losses were deemed to have occurred based on these tests. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2004, the FASB approved the consensus reached on the emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments. The Issues objective is to provide guidance for identifying
other-than-temporarily impaired investments. EITF 03-1 also provides new disclosure requirements
for investments that are deemed to be temporarily impaired. In September 2004, FASB issued a FASB
Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-1-1 that delays the effective date of the measurement and recognition
guidance in EITF 03-1 until further notice. The disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 are effective
with this annual report for fiscal 2004. Once the FASB reaches a final decision on the measurement
and recognition provisions, the Company will evaluate the impact of the adoption of the accounting
provisions of EITF 03-1. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R
requires employee stock options and rights to purchase shares under stock participation plans to be
accounted for under the fair value method, and eliminates the ability to account for these
instruments under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, and allowed under
the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123R 17




---



##### Table of Contents



requires the use of an option pricing model for estimating fair value, which is amortized to
expense over the service periods. The requirements of SFAS No. 123R are effective for fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. If the Company had applied the provisions of SFAS No.123R
to the financial statements for the period ending December 31, 2004, net loss would have increased
by approximately $520,000. SFAS No. 123R allows for either prospective recognition of compensation
expense or retrospective recognition, which may be back to the original issuance of SFAS No. 123 or
only to interim periods in the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating these
transition methods. In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Inventory Pricing, for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) requiring
that those items be recognized as current-period expenses regardless of whether they meet the
criterion of so abnormal. This statement also requires that allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
The statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during the fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. Management does not expect this statement to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment
of APB Opinion No. 29. APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, is based on
the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29, eliminating the exception to fair
value accounting for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with
general exception to fair value accounting for nonmonetary exchanges that do not have commercial
substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity
are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The statement is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Management
does not expect this statement to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations. Risk Factors SinoFresh operates in a rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks, some of
which are beyond our control. The following discussion highlights some of these risks. Risks Related to the Business We have incurred substantial losses and we have a negative cash flow from operations and
negative working capital.We have incurred substantial losses since inception and we have incurred
negative cash flow from operations during each of the last two years and have negative working
capital as of December 31, 2004. As a result, our auditors have modified their report on our
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 with respect to our ability to continue
as a going concern. We recently secured $1,830,000 from the sale of secured convertible
debentures, which in addition to paying off existing debt, will be used for marketing and general
corporate purposes. It can not be assured that this financing will produce the revenues
anticipated through our marketing efforts and may therefore be inadequate if future operating cash
flows do not improve. If we cannot generate positive cash flow, it may be necessary to obtain
additional external financing. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be
available, or if available, that it will be on terms and conditions favorable to us. Our
operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to generate sufficient cash or obtain
additional financing. We have a limited relevant operating history, and we may not maintain profitability.Our
company has had a cumulative net loss from inception. Our needs for continued expenditures for
product research and development and marketing, among other things, will make it difficult for us
to reduce our operating expenses in order to deal with lack of sales growth or unanticipated
reductions in existing sales. Our failure to balance expenditures in any period with sales could
have an adverse effect on results of operations. 18




---



##### Table of Contents



We have a limited relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our prospects can be
made. Such prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties
frequently encountered in the establishment of a new company and the development of new products in
established and crowded markets in a highly-competitive consumer industry, such as the U.S.
pharmaceutical industry. There are also risks, expenses and difficulties encountered in the shift
from development to commercialization of new products. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to implement successfully our development, manufacturing, and marketing strategies, generate
meaningful revenues, or attain or maintain profitable operations. The possibility of our future
success must be considered relative to the problems, challenges, complications and delays
frequently encountered in connection with the development and operation of a new business, and the
development and marketing of relatively new health care products such as the SinoFresh products. We may need significant additional financing to implement our business plan.We can not
provide assurance that the recent debt financing will meet all of our financing needs or that
additional financing will not be required in the future. There may continue to be a need for
additional financing, through debt or the issuance of additional equity securities or a combination
of both, to implement business objectives such as marketing, research and development on new
products, conducting focus group studies and clinical trials. If additional funding is needed in
the future, there is no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining additional financing or if
additional financing is available, that it will be on terms favorable to us. We and certain of our management are involved in litigation instituted by certain shareholders
and two directors of SinoFresh, which will involve significant financial and personnel resources.
On February 20, 2004, a lawsuit was filed styled Hawkins, et al. vs. Charles Fust, et al. Amended
complaints were subsequently filed, the last of which was filed in June, 2004. The plaintiffs
include Stephen Bannon and David Otto, directors of the Company, as well as other purported
shareholders of SinoFresh. The defendants are Charles Fust, Stacey Maloney-Fust and P. Robert
DuPont, directors and officers of SinoFresh; Russell R. Lee, III, a former officer; Greenberg
Traurig, P.A. and Randolph H. Fields, corporate counsel for SinoFresh; and, nominally, SinoFresh.
The complaint alleges, among other things, that Charles Fust used corporate funds for his personal
benefit, that he did not transfer patents to the Company and two foreign entities related through
common stock ownership, and inadequate disclosure in public filings regarding related party
transactions and Mr. Fusts stock ownership. Although management strongly believes that the
allegations in the complaint are without merit, if the legal proceedings are protracted, the
continuing defense of the lawsuit will be costly financially and will demand significant attention
of management  all of which could have an adverse effect on our operations. Two non-employee directors have raised other issues concerning our legal exposure. Messrs.
Bannon and Otto believe that we may have exposure in connection with our decision to have the
foreign patents transferred to SinoFresh instead of to two foreign entities and for incurring costs
to maintain and/or transfer the foreign patents; and in connection with our Companys decision to
technically modify its original operating focus. Substantially all of our assets, including U.S. patents, are collateral for loans to SinoFresh
by third parties.The debentures issued in the recent debt financing are collateralized by
substantially all of our assets, including our patents. The debentures are convertible into common
stock, contain anti-dilution provisions and until the debentures are paid in full, prohibit us from
incurring other indebtedness without the consent of the debenture holders, except for borrowings in
existence on the date of the debenture financing or indebtedness to trade creditors or financial
institutions incurred in the ordinary course of business. The maturity date of the debentures is
December 6, 2006. The debentures bear interest at 6% per annum and interest only payments are
payable quarterly. If we become in default of the payment terms or other provisions of the
debentures, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully negotiate new terms
favorable to us. In that event, the lenders may elect to accelerate the payment terms and may
exercise their right against our collateral, including our patents, which would have material
adverse consequences to our business and operations. If an event of default occurs under any one of the debentures, it could result in a serious
problem for us and cause us to curtail our operations or sell some of our assets to repay all of
the debentures.Effective December 6, 2004, we issued convertible debentures to nine investors in
the aggregate principal amount of $1,830,000. Each debenture provides for the following events of
default, and a default under one debenture is deemed a default under all debentures: 19




---



##### Table of Contents



- failure to pay interest and principal payments when due; - a breach by us of any material covenant in the debenture, the related warrant or the
securities purchase agreement that is not cured within 10 days of a holders notice to us of the
breach; - a breach of any material representation and warranty in the debentures or any other
agreement or document issued by us in connection with the issuance of the debentures, which breach
has or will have a material adverse effect on the rights of the holders of the debenture with
respect to the debenture and the related securities purchase agreement or the registration rights
agreement; - we or our subsidiary makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or a receiver or a
trustee is appointed for us or our subsidiary; - any form of bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding is instituted by or against us or our subsidiary; - our failure to timely deliver shares of common stock when due upon conversion of the debentures; - any judgment, writ or similar process is entered or filed against us or our subsidiary or
any of our property or other assets for more than $50,000, and shall remain not vacated, bonded or
stayed for a period of 20 days, unless otherwise consented to by the holders of the debentures,
which consent may not be unreasonably withheld; - our common stock is no longer quoted on the OTCBB or an equivalent replacement exchange, or,
if applicable, the Nasdaq, the NYSE or AMEX; - a failure to obtain effectiveness of the registration statement within 60 days from the date
it is filed with the SEC or 135 days if the SEC reviews the registration statement (this
requirement has been met as of this filing); - the occurrence and continuance of a default under any other of the debentures. If we default on the debentures and the holders accelerate the maturity date, we will be
required to pay the higher of: (a) 125% multiplied by the Default Sum (with Default Sum defined as the sum of (i) the then
outstanding principal plus (ii) the accrued and unpaid interest plus (iii) accrued and unpaid
default interest plus (iv) any amounts owed under the registration rights agreement among the
Company and the holders of the debentures); or (b) the parity value of the Default Sum, where the parity value is equal to product of (i)
the highest number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of or otherwise pursuant to
such Default Sum in accordance with the conversion provisions of the debentures, multiplied by (ii)
the market price for the common stock during the period beginning on the date of the first
occurrence of an event of default and ending on the day prior to the date such default payment is
to be paid. If the default payment is not made within 5 business days of written demand for same by the
holder of the debentures, the holders have the right at any time, so long as we remain in default,
to require us to issue, in lieu of the default payment, the number of shares of common stock equal
to the default payment divided by the conversion price then in effect. The cash required to pay these amounts will most likely come out of our working capital.
Since we rely on our working capital for day-to-day operations, a default under any of the
debentures could have a serious and adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition to such an extent that we are forced to restructure, sell some of our assets or curtail
our operations, any of which would have a detrimental effect on the value of our common stock. 20




---



##### Table of Contents



We may not be able to off-set all of our net operating loss carry-forwards against future
income. At December 31, 2004, net operating losses available to be carried forward for federal
income tax purposes were approximately $9.4 million expiring in various amounts through 2024.
Utilization of our net operating losses may be subject to substantial annual limitation due to the
ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions.
Such annual limitation could result in the expiration of the net operating loss before utilization,
which would subject the Company to have more tax liability than if it had been able to off-set the
net operating losses against income. Our ability to implement our business plan depends on our ability to attract and retain key
personnel.Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued services of the
current officers and other necessary personnel, particularly Mr. Fust, the Chairman of our board of
directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. DuPont, the Vice President of Research &
Development, and a member of our board of directors. The loss of either of these officers or
directors would likely have a significantly detrimental effect on our business. We have obtained
key man life insurance policies on the life of Mr. Fust in the amount of $925,000. Our prospects will also depend on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified sales,
marketing, and managerial personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be
no assurance that we will be able to employ or retain such personnel. If the SinoFresh products do not gain widespread market acceptance, results of operations will
suffer.Although studies have indicated that the SinoFresh products can significantly reduce the
symptoms of sinusitis and upper respiratory distress, management cannot be certain that the
products will achieve widespread acceptance by the market. If any unanticipated problem arises
concerning the efficacy of SinoFresh Nasal & Sinus Care or SinoFresh Daily Throat Spray or any of
the other new products we may bring to market, or if one or more of these products fails to achieve
widespread market acceptance because of a lack of marketing capital or for any other reason, our
operating results and prospects would be materially adversely affected. Unanticipated problems associated with product development and commercialization could
adversely affect our operating results.The successful development of our existing and new
products is subject to the risks of failure and delay inherent in the development and
commercialization of products based on innovative technologies. These risks include the
possibilities that:  
    we may experience unanticipated or otherwise negative research and development
results;
    existing or proposed products may be found to be ineffective or unsafe, or may
otherwise fail to receive required regulatory clearances or approvals;
    we may find that existing or proposed products, while effective, are uneconomical to
commercialize or market;
    existing or proposed products may not achieve broad market acceptance; or
    proprietary rights held by third parties preclude us from developing or marketing
existing or proposed products. Our inability to develop and commercialize our existing products or any new products on a
timely basis and within our financial budgets could have a material adverse effect on operating
results and future prospects. FDA and other government regulation may restrict our ability to sell our products.We are
subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting our business. Our
products are subject to regulation by the FDA, including regulations with respect to labeling of
products, approval of ingredients in products, claims made regarding the products, and disclosure
of product ingredients. If we do not comply with these regulations, the FDA could force us to stop
selling the affected products or require us to incur substantial costs in adopting measures to
maintain compliance with these regulations. Our advertising claims regarding our products are
subject to the jurisdiction of the FTC as well as the FDA. In both cases we are required to obtain
scientific data to support any
advertising or labeling health claims we make concerning our products. If we are unable to
provide the required support for such claims, the FTC may stop us from making such claims or
require the company to stop selling the affected products. 21




---



##### Table of Contents



Our inability to provide scientific proof for product claims may adversely affect sales.The
marketing of SinoFresh products involves claims that these products kill the mold and bacteria that
can cause sinusitis and related sinus disorders. Under the FDA and Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
rules, we are required to obtain scientific data to support any health claims we make concerning
these products. Although we have conducted independent clinical tests and provided scientific data
to the FDA in support of claims regarding these products, we may be required to provide additional
data in the future. In such an event, we cannot be certain that the scientific data we have
obtained or will obtain in support of our claims will be deemed acceptable to the FDA or FTC. If
the FDA or the FTC requests any supporting information, and we are unable to provide support that
is acceptable to the FDA or the FTC, either agency could require us to stop making the claims in
question or restrict us from selling the affected products. We may fail to compete effectively against larger companies.The consumer health products
industry is highly competitive. We compete with companies in the United States and abroad that are
engaged in the development of both traditional and innovative health care products, including sinus
products. Many of these companies have much greater financial and technical resources and
production and marketing capabilities than we do. Further, many of these companies have already
achieved significant product acceptance and brand recognition with respect to products that compete
directly with the SinoFresh products. Our competitors may successfully develop and market superior
or less expensive products, which could render the current SinoFresh product and other future
SinoFresh products less valuable or unmarketable. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or if we infringe on the intellectual
property of others, our financial condition and future prospects could be materially harmed.We
rely significantly on the protections afforded by patent and trademark registrations that we
routinely seek from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and from similar agencies in
foreign countries. We cannot be certain that any patent or trademark application that is filed
will be approved by the USPTO or other foreign agencies. In addition, we cannot be certain that we
will be able to successfully defend any trademark, trade name or patent that we hold against claims
from, or use by, competitors or other third parties. No consistent policy has emerged from the
USPTO or the courts regarding the breadth of claims allowed or the degree of protection afforded
under biotechnology and similar patents. Our future success will depend on our ability to prevent
others from infringing on our proprietary rights, as well as our ability to operate without
infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. We may be required at times to take legal action
to protect our proprietary rights and, despite our best efforts, we may be sued for infringing on
the patent rights of others. Patent litigation is costly and, even if we prevail, the cost of such
litigation could adversely affect our financial condition. If we do not prevail, in addition to
any damages we might have to pay, we could be required to stop the infringing activity or obtain a
license. We cannot be certain that any required license would be available on acceptable terms, or
at all. If we fail to obtain a license, our business might be materially adversely affected. In
addition to seeking patent protection, we rely upon a combination of non-disclosure agreements,
other contractual restrictions and trade secrecy laws to protect proprietary information. There
can be no assurance that these steps will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our
proprietary information or that our competitors will not independently develop technology or trade
secrets that compete with our proprietary information. We may incur significant costs resulting from product liability claims.We would be subject
to significant liability should use or consumption of our products cause injury, illness or death.
Although we carry product liability insurance, there can be no assurance that our insurance will be
adequate to protect us against product liability claims or that insurance coverage will continue to
be available on reasonable terms. A product liability claim, even one without merit or for which
we have substantial coverage, could result in significant legal defense costs, thereby increasing
our expenses and lowering earnings. Such a claim, whether or not proven to be valid, could have a
material adverse effect on product branding and goodwill, resulting in reduced market acceptance of
our products. This in turn could materially adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition. We do not have manufacturing capabilities.We currently do not have the physical or personnel
resources to independently manufacture our product or any other products that we may develop. We
currently outsource all of our product manufacturing and packaging operations and intend to
continue this outsourcing for the foreseeable future. If we are unable to maintain suitable
arrangements for manufacturing of our SinoFresh product or any other products, or if our third
party contractors fail to adequately perform their manufacturing operations, our 22




---



##### Table of Contents



sales and related
financial results could be materially adversely affected. If, in the future, we decide to
establish our own manufacturing facilities, we will require substantial additional funds and
significant additional personnel to undertake such operations. We cannot be certain that such
funding or a sufficient number of such qualified persons will be available. Return of a significant amount of product could harm our business.Our product has a 30-day,
unconditional, money back guarantee. Any consumer, who is not satisfied with our product within
this time period for any reason, or no reason at all, may return it or any unused portion for a
full refund. Most large retail chains have their own established policies for product returns and
we intend to fully comply with these policies as well. We believe product returns will be less than one percent (1%) of sales, but there can be no
assurance that actual levels of returns will not significantly exceed the amounts anticipated.
Should an adverse reaction to any of our products occur affecting a significant number of
customers, a product recall could occur which could materially impact our financial condition and
our ability to successfully re-enter the market following the recall. Additionally, although we
will not directly engage in the manufacture of any product we market and sell, we could be exposed
to product liability claims from faulty manufacture. We may be required to indemnify our directors and officers.We have authority under Section
607.0850 of the Florida Business Corporation Act to indemnify our directors and officers to the
extent provided in that statute. Our Articles of Incorporation require SinoFresh to indemnify each
of our directors and officers against liabilities imposed upon them (including reasonable amounts
paid in settlement) and expenses incurred by them in connection with any claim made against them or
any action, suit or proceeding to which they may be a party by reason of their being or having been
a director or officer of the company. We maintain officers and directors liability insurance
coverage with limits of liability of $5,000,000. There can be no assurance that such insurance
will be available in the future, or that if available, it will be available on terms that are
acceptable to us. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the insurance coverage provided will
be sufficient to cover the amount of any judgment awarded against an officer or director (either
individually or in the aggregate). Consequently, if such judgment exceeds the coverage under the
policy, SinoFresh may be forced to pay such difference. We intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our officers and directors
containing provisions that may require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers and
directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as
officers or directors (other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature)
and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they
could be indemnified. Management believes that such indemnification provisions and agreements are
necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and executive officers. We may have certain financial exposure if there was not an exemption from registration for the
issuance of securities in connection with the acquisition by merger of our predecessor.We issued
10,768,490 shares of common stock, 858,170 shares of Series A preferred stock, 1,500,000 shares of
Series B preferred stock, and 1,218,711 shares of Series C preferred stock in respect of the
acquisition by merger of our predecessor in September 2003. We have been unable to obtain from
either our former counsel or former counsel to our predecessor (Mr. David Otto, a director), at the
time of the acquisition, information we believe is sufficient to indisputably support one or more
exemption(s) from registration that they relied upon in connection with the issuance of the merger
shares. If such information is not available, the issuance of our shares of capital stock in
respect of the merger may not have been in compliance with the registration provisions of the
federal and state securities laws. There may have been a violation of Section 5 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended due to the unavailability of an exemption from registration. As a result,
we may be exposed to claims for rescission by shareholders who received shares in the merger.
Although we would vigorously defend against any such actions, litigation may be costly and there is
no assurance of the outcome. Risks Related to Our Common Stock The large number of shares eligible for immediate and future sales may depress the price of
our stock.Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 500,000,000, shares of common
stock, no par value per share, and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value per share.
As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding 14,097,120 shares of common stock, of which 10,768,490
shares became available for public resale 23




---



##### Table of Contents



under Rule 144 in September 2004. Also as of December
31, 2004, we had outstanding a total of 3,268,295 shares of Series A, B and C preferred stock which
are convertible into a total of 5,712,795 shares of common stock, all of which common shares became
eligible for public resale under Rule 144 in September 2004. We have reserved 3,000,000 shares of
common stock for issuance in respect of option grants under our stock option plan. From those
available shares, outstanding options have been granted for 1,304,750 shares of common stock, and
there remain available for options under the plan 1,695,250 shares of common stock. In addition,
there are 269,625 shares of common stock that are issuable upon exercise of stock options issued to
independent consultants pursuant to commitments previously made by our predecessors. There are
4,405,115 shares that are issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, and 3,327,273 shares that
are issuable upon conversion of debentures, and up to 1,663,650 shares that may be issued under the
debentures on account of interest or anti-dilution adjustments. The outstanding warrants and
options contain exercise prices ranging from $0.29 to $7.00. Therefore, the desire of the holders
of those warrants and options to sell will depend on the market price of our common stock at any
given time. Further, if we default under the terms of the debentures, we may be required to issue
additional common stock to the debenture holders if we fail to make the default payment stated in
the debentures. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the open market, including
sales of the shares offered for resale in this prospectus, could adversely affect the market price
of our common stock. Our board of directors has the authority to issue additional shares of common stock and
preferred stock up to the authorized amount stated in our Articles of Incorporation. Our board of
directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to acquire one or more businesses or other
types of property, or to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such
shares may result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the outstanding shares of our
common stock. If we do issue any such additional shares, such issuance also will cause a reduction
in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other shareholders. Further, any such
issuance may result in a change of control of SinoFresh. We filed a registration statement in order for certain shareholders to sell their stock and a
substantial number of shares being sold in the market may cause our stock price to decline.We
filed a registration statement for certain holders of our equity securities in accordance with
registration rights agreements with them. The registration statement, which was declared effective
by the SEC on February 1, 2005, allows those holders the ability to sell their stock without
reliance on the holding period and other requirements of Rule 144. A total of 10,041,153 shares of
common stock are included in the registration statement, comprised of the following: 1,018,490
shares of issued and outstanding restricted common stock; 4,031,740 shares issuable upon exercise
of warrants with exercise prices ranging from $0.29 to $7.00 per share; 3,327,273 shares that are
issuable upon conversion of outstanding debentures at a conversion rate of $0.55 per share, without
further payment for those shares; and an additional 1,663,650 shares of common stock that may be
issued on account of interest or anti-dilution adjustments relating to the debentures. Sales of
substantial amounts of such common stock in the open market could adversely affect the market price
of our common stock. The price of our common stock may continue to be volatile.The market price of our common
stock, which is quoted for trading on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, has been highly volatile
and may continue to be volatile in the future. Any or a combination of the following factors could
cause the market value of our common stock to decline quickly:  
    operating results that differ from market expectations;
    negative or other unanticipated results of clinical trials or other testing;
    delays in product development;
    technological innovations or commercial product introductions by our competitors;
    changes in government regulations;
    developments concerning proprietary rights, including pending or threatened patent litigation; 24




---



##### Table of Contents




    public concerns regarding the safety of any of our products; and,
    general economic and stock market conditions. Since the inception of trading activities in September 2003, the stock market has experienced,
and it may continue to experience, significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations
have particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of many small capitalization
companies that are not yet profitable or that experience low or inconsistent earnings. Often, the
affect on the price of such securities is disproportionate to the operating performance of such
companies. In our case, such broad market fluctuations may adversely affect your ability to
dispose of your shares at a price equal to or above the price at which you purchased such shares. Our common stock may be subject to penny stock regulation, which may make it difficult for
investors to sell our common stock.The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker/dealer
practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks generally are equity
securities with a price of less than $5.00 per share (other than securities registered on certain
national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market, provided that current price and
volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange
system). The penny stock rules require a broker/dealer, prior to completing a transaction in a
penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document
prepared by the SEC that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks
in the penny stock market. The broker/dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer
quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker/dealer and its salesperson in the
transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in
the customers account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in
a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rules the broker/dealer must make a special written
determination that a penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the
purchasers written agreement to the transaction. Our common stock will likely be subject to the
penny stock rules. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of
trading activity in any secondary market for our common stock. Accordingly, holders of our common
stock may find it difficult to sell their shares, if they are able to do so at all. We do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.For the foreseeable future, we
intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do
not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to pay
dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon then
existing conditions, including our financial condition and results of operations, capital
requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, and other factors that the board of
directors considers relevant. Our preferred stock may cause dilution.Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance
of up to 200,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock with such rights and preferences as
our board of directors, without further shareholder approval, may determine from time to time. Of
these preferred shares, 858,170 shares are designated as Series A preferred stock, 1,500,000 shares
are designated as Series B preferred stock, and 1,250,000 shares are designated as Series C
preferred stock. As of December 2004, we had 823,795 shares of outstanding Series A preferred
stock; 1,500,000 shares of outstanding Series B preferred stock; and 944,500 shares of outstanding
Series C preferred stock. Series A preferred stock is convertible into common and has voting
rights with the common, on a one-for one basis. The Series B and Series C preferred stock are
convertible into common stock and have voting rights with the common stock on a one for two basis.
As of December, 2004, a total 5,712,795 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all of
our outstanding preferred stock are eligible for public resale under Rule 144. Furthermore, each
share of Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $2.00 per
share on an as converted basis before any holders of common would be entitled to receive payment
for their shares or dividends upon a liquidation of SinoFresh. As of December 31, 2004, there
remained 196,731,705 shares of authorized but undesignated and unissued shares of preferred stock
that may be sold in the future and that can, at the discretion of our board of directors, be
designated as another series of preferred
stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights and preferences that are
senior, and not available, to the holders of our common stock. Thus, issuances of new series of
preferred stock could adversely affect the relative voting power, distributions and other rights of
the common stock. Holders of our common stock could realize less than the amount of dividends
and/or distributions to which they would otherwise be entitled. 25




---



##### Table of Contents



Further, preferred stock could be used as a method of discouraging, delaying, or preventing a
take-over of SinoFresh. If we issue blank check preferred stock, it could have a dilutive effect
upon our common stock. This would decrease the chance that our shareholders would realize a
premium over market price for their shares of common stock as a result of a takeover bid. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 26




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Board of Directors
SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc.
Englewood, Florida We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Oversight Board
(United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and subsidiary at December
31, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1, the Company has incurred substantial
losses since its inception, has a working capital deficiency at December 31, 2004, and has incurred
negative cash flow from operations. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Managements plans related to these matters are also
described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A.
Certified Public Accountants
Orlando, Florida
Dated January 28, 2005 27




---



##### Table of Contents



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET December 31, 2004ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    1,332,424Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $14,244
    
    
    229,273Inventory
    
    
    43,124Deferred debt issuance costs, current
    
    
    205,068Other current assets
    
    
    323,468TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
    
    
    2,133,357FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT, NET
    
    
    110,204PATENTS, NET
    
    
    2,519,247GOODWILL
    
    
    2,409,401DEFERRED DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS
    
    
    187,994OTHER ASSETS
    
    
    6,418$
    7,366,621LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITYCURRENT LIABILITIESCurrent portion of capital leases
    
    $
    22,191Accounts payable
    
    
    1,828,911Accrued expenses
    
    
    490,384TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

    
    
    2,341,486CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, net of unamortized debt discounts
    
    
    1,245,417CAPITAL LEASES, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES
    
    
    61,660TOTAL LIABILITIES
    
    
    3,648,563COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:Common stock, no par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 14,097,120
shares issued and outstanding
    
    
    5,585,378Preferred Stock, no par value; $2 liquidation value per share; 200,000,000
shares authorizedSeries A convertible preferred stock, voting; 858,170 shares authorized,
823,795 shares issued and outstanding
    
    
    1,647,589Series B convertible preferred stock, voting; 1,500,000 shares authorized, issued
and outstanding
    
    
    3,000,000Series C convertible preferred stock, voting; 1,250,000 shares authorized;
944,500 shares issued and outstanding
    
    
    1,695,681Accumulated deficit
    
    
    (7,987,457
    )Deferred stock-based compensation
    
    
    (91,133
    )Subscriptions receivable
    
    
    (132,000
    )TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
    
    
    3,718,058TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
    
    $
    7,366,621
 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 28




---



##### Table of Contents



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Year Ended
    
    
    Year EndedDecember 31, 2004
    
    
    December 31, 2003REVENUE, net
    
    $
    3,564,514
    
    
    $
    1,830,195COST OF REVENUE
    
    
    942,623
    
    
    
    607,766GROSS PROFIT
    
    
    2,621,891
    
    
    
    1,222,429OPERATING EXPENSESSalaries and other compensation expenses
    
    
    1,401,419
    
    
    
    852,312Professional fees
    
    
    1,465,294
    
    
    
    1,869,103Other general and administrative expenses
    
    
    567,913
    
    
    
    560,657Marketing and advertising expenses
    
    
    1,137,832
    
    
    
    1,196,939Research and development expenses
    
    
    236,387
    
    
    
    184,772Depreciation and amortization
    
    
    261,697
    
    
    
    250,834TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
    
    
    5,070,542
    
    
    
    4,914,617LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    
    
    (2,448,651
    )
    
    
    (3,692,188
    )OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):Interest, net
    
    
    (1,303,380
    )
    
    
    (85,185
    )Other income (expense)
    
    
    45,751
    
    
    
    8,058TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
    
    
    (1,257,629
    )
    
    
    (77,127
    )NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    
    
    (3,706,280
    )
    
    
    (3,769,315
    )PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
    
    
    
    
    
    NET LOSS
    
    $
    (3,706,280
    )
    
    $
    (3,769,315
    )NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
-Basic and diluted
    
    $
    (0.28
    )
    
    $
    (0.33
    )WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
-Basic and diluted
    
    
    13,442,660
    
    
    
    11,547,120
 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 29




---



##### Table of Contents



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY Preferred StockCommon Stock
    
    
    Series A
    
    
    Series B
    
    
    Series C
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TotalNumber
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Deferred stock-
    
    
    Subscriptions
    
    
    Accumulated
    
    
    Stockholdersof Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    of Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    of Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    of Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    based compensation
    
    
    Receivable
    
    
    Deficit
    
    
    EquityBalance at December 31, 2002
    
    
    10,768,490
    
    
    $
    2,154
    
    
    
    808,170
    
    
    $
    1,616,339
    
    
    
    1,500,000
    
    
    $
    3,000,000
    
    
    
    337,500
    
    
    $
    608,712
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (511,862
    )
    
    $
    4,715,343Effect reverse merger
    
    
    2,483,333
    
    
    
    (3,238
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3,238
    )Stock issued as settlement
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    50,000
    
    
    
    100,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100,000Series C preferred Stock issued
issued under private placement
offering, net of $181,873
offering
costs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    881,211
    
    
    
    1,580,549
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,580,549Common stock issued to
consultant
    
    
    50,000
    
    
    
    123,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    123,000Issuance of options and warrants
to consultants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    706,125
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    706,125Proceeds from sales of warrants,
net of $176,050 in costs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,423,950
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (652,000
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    771,950Payments received on
subscriptions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    400,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    400,000Net loss, year ended
December 31, 2003
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3,769,315
    )
    
    
    (3,769,315
    )Balance at December 31, 2003
    
    
    13,301,823
    
    
    
    2,251,991
    
    
    
    858,170
    
    
    
    1,716,339
    
    
    
    1,500,000
    
    
    
    3,000,000
    
    
    
    1,218,711
    
    
    
    2,189,261
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (252,000
    )
    
    
    (4,281,177
    )
    
    
    4,624,414
 See notes to consolidated financial statements 30




---



##### Table of Contents



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (CONTINUED) Preferred StockCommon Stock
    
    
    Series A
    
    
    Series B
    
    
    Series C
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TotalNumber
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Deferred stock-
    
    
    Subscriptions
    
    
    Accumulated
    
    
    Stockholdersof Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    of Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    of Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    of Shares
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    based compensation
    
    
    Receivable
    
    
    Deficit
    
    
    EquityPayments received on
subscriptions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    120,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    120,000Issuance of common shares
for services
    
    
    212,500
    
    
    
    147,375
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    147,375Conversion of Series A preferred
to common
    
    
    34,375
    
    
    
    68,750
    
    
    
    (34,375
    )
    
    
    (68,750
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Conversion of Series C preferred
to common
    
    
    548,422
    
    
    
    493,580
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (274,211
    )
    
    
    (493,580
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Issuance of options and warrants
to consultants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    494,182
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    494,182Issuance of options to employees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    299,500
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (299,500
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Amortization of unearned stock
based compensation
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    208,367
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    208,367Issuance of warrants in connection
with the convertible debentures
    
    
    
    
    
    
    610,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    610,000Beneficial conversion of
debentures
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,220,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,220,000Net loss, year ended
December 31, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3,706,280
    )
    
    
    (3,706,280
    )Balance at December 31, 2004
    
    
    14,097,120
    
    
    $
    5,585,378
    
    
    
    823,795
    
    
    $
    1,647,589
    
    
    
    1,500,000
    
    
    $
    3,000,000
    
    
    
    944,500
    
    
    $
    1,695,681
    
    
    $
    (91,133
    )
    
    $
    (132,000
    )
    
    $
    (7,987,457
    )
    
    $
    3,718,058
 See notes to consolidated financial statements 31




---



##### Table of Contents



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended
    
    
    Year EndedDecember 31, 2004
    
    
    December 31, 2003CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss
    
    $
    (3,706,280
    )
    
    $
    (3,769,315
    )Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operations:Beneficial conversion feature of the convertible debentures
    
    
    1,220,000
    
    
    
    Stock, options and warrants issued for services
    
    
    462,359
    
    
    
    829,125Amortization and depreciation
    
    
    261,697
    
    
    
    250,834Stock issued as settlement cost
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100,000Bad debt expense
    
    
    (4,756
    )
    
    
    17,081Change in allowance for returns
    
    
    4,000
    
    
    
    Amortization of debt discount
    
    
    25,417
    
    
    
    Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
    
    
    17,089
    
    
    
    Other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3,238
    )Changes in assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable
    
    
    417,452
    
    
    
    (644,906
    )Inventory
    
    
    128,883
    
    
    
    (78,362
    )Other current assets
    
    
    (29,921
    )
    
    
    (162,348
    )Other assets
    
    
    800
    
    
    
    13,457Accounts payable
    
    
    1,135,653
    
    
    
    460,138Accrued expenses
    
    
    (188,740
    )
    
    
    279,876NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    
    
    (256,347
    )
    
    
    (2,707,658
    )INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Acquisition of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc., net of cash
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (72,605
    )Payments for purchases of property and equipment
    
    
    (2,947
    )
    
    
    (35,073
    )NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
    
    
    (2,947
    )
    
    
    (107,678
    )FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Net proceeds from issuance of stock and warrants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,484,499Payments received on subscriptions receivable
    
    
    120,000
    
    
    
    400,000Proceeds from short-term notes payable
    
    
    
    
    
    
    300,000Proceeds from long-term debt borrowings
    
    
    1,830,000
    
    
    
    Deferred debt issuance costs
    
    
    (141,850
    )
    
    
    Payments on long-term debt and capital leases
    
    
    (584,826
    )
    
    
    (246,454
    )NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
    
    
    1,223,324
    
    
    
    2,938,045NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
    
    964,030
    
    
    
    122,709CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS - beginning of period
    
    
    368,394
    
    
    
    245,685CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS - end of period
    
    $
    1,332,424
    
    
    $
    368,394SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:Cash paid during the period for interest
    
    $
    70,926
    
    
    $
    141,685NON-CASH ACTIVITY:Warrants issued to placement agent
increasing deferred debt issuance costs and common stock
    
    $
    268,301
    
    
    $
    Warrants issued in connection with convertible debentures
decreasing convertible debentures and increasing common stock
    
    $
    610,000
    
    
    $
    Warrants issued in connection with a services agreement
increasing other current assets and common stock
    
    $
    119,264
    
    
    $
    
 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 32




---



##### Table of Contents



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 NOTE 1: Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ORGANIZATION: The Companys predecessor, SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (SinoFresh  Delaware)
was incorporated in the state of Delaware on October 15, 2002. In November 2002 SinoFresh -
Delaware entered into an asset purchase agreement (the Asset Purchase Agreement) whereby it
received certain assets and liabilities of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. effective at the close of
business on November 15, 2002 in exchange for 808,170 shares of its Series A preferred stock (see
notes 2 and 7). On September 8, 2003, (the Merger Date) SinoFresh   Delaware; SinoFresh Acquisition Corp.
(Acquisition), SinoFresh Corp., formerly known as e-Book Network, Inc., a Florida corporation, and
the sole director and majority shareholder of SinoFresh Corp. entered into a Merger Agreement. In
addition, SinoFresh Corp. changed its name to SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (SinoFresh  Florida or
SinoFresh or Company) and amended its Articles of Incorporation authorizing the issuance of up to
700,000,000 shares of no par value capital stock, consisting of 500,000,000 shares of common stock
and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The amended Articles also designated 858,170 shares of
the preferred stock as Series A preferred stock with each share convertible into one common share
and possessing one vote. In addition, 1,500,000 shares of the preferred stock were designated as
Series B preferred stock with each share convertible into two shares of common stock and possessing
two votes. Another 1,250,000 shares of preferred stock was designated as Series C preferred stock
with each share convertible into two shares of common stock and possessing two votes. Under the Merger Agreement, SinoFresh Corp. acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
SinoFresh  Delaware consisting of 21,536,980 shares of common stock, 1,716,399 shares of Series A
preferred stock; 6,000,000 shares of Series B preferred stock and 4,874,843 shares of Series C
preferred stock in exchange for 10,768,490 shares of SinoFresh Corp. common stock, 858,170 shares
of SinoFresh Corp. Series A preferred stock; 1,500,000 shares of SinoFresh Corp. Series B preferred
stock and 1,218,711 shares of SinoFresh Corp. Series C preferred stock. In connection with the
Merger Agreement, the sole director and majority shareholder of SinoFresh Corp. agreed to tender
19,616,667 shares in SinoFresh Corp. back to SinoFresh Corp. for cancellation. In addition,
SinoFresh  Delaware was to exchange options to purchase 3,000,000 common shares, warrants to
purchase 900,000 common shares for $1.00 per share, warrants to purchase 1,350,000 common shares
for $5.00 per share and warrants to purchase 100,000 common shares for $7.00 per share for
SinoFresh Corp. options to purchase 1,500,000 common shares, warrants to purchase 450,000 common
shares for $1.00 per share, warrants to purchase 1,350,000 common shares for $5.00 per share and
warrants to purchase 100,000 common shares for $7.00 per share. Prior to the issuance of the options for 3,000,000 common shares, the Company amended the
grant list. The number of options granted under the amended grant before the merger was 2,199,250,
which amounted to 1,099,625 post merger. In addition, the number of warrants exchanged at $5.00
per share was ultimately 1,383,970. Subsequent to the merger, Acquisition, which changed its name to SinoFresh Corporation,
remains the operating subsidiary of the Company. The shareholders of SinoFresh  Delaware obtained
approximately 81% of the common stock and additional voting control by virtue of the voting rights
of the preferred stock, providing a total voting interest of 91%. Since the shareholders of
SinoFresh  Delaware also obtained management control, the merger transaction was treated as a
recapitalization of the Company, with SinoFresh  Delaware as the acquirer for financial accounting
purposes. Accordingly the shareholders of SinoFresh Corp. were deemed to be issued approximately
2,483,000 common shares. The amended Articles of Incorporation stipulate the Company will register a portion of the
shares of common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, Series A,
Series B and Series C preferred shareholders also have certain registration rights. The Company
believes that its obligations to register these shares are moot since the holders of those shares
are able to now convert and/or sell under Rule 144. 33




---



##### Table of Contents



All share and per share data in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
retroactively changed to reflect this transaction. NATURE OF BUSINESS: The Company is engaged in the research, development, and marketing of
proprietary products for the prevention and treatment of various upper respiratory ailments.
SinoFresh Nasal and Sinus Care was distributed by the Company in a limited geographical area in
Florida until May 2003 at which time the Company entered into a master broker agreement with a
national company to obtain national distribution of its nasal product through various national
drugstores and grocery store chains. As of December 31, 2004 the Company has distribution
agreements with most of the major drug retailers as well as certain major grocery chains, which
enable it to place its product in over 20,000 retail locations across the country. The Companys business is subject to various risks and uncertainties and the Companys ability
to continue as a going concern is dependent on its ability to market and distribute its products
and utilize the technology underlying its patents. The Company has a working capital deficit at
December 31, 2004 of approximately $208,000, it has incurred a net loss of approximately $3,706,000
and has consumed approximately $398,000 of cash in operations for the year then ended. Management
believes that these risks are mitigated by the annual growth in revenues, recent debenture
financing and possible future capital funding and/or borrowings. The rate of the Companys future
growth and success will be dependent on its ability to generate the necessary resources through
product sales and/or through borrowings or equity financing. The accompanying statements do not
include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to generate these revenues
and implement its business plan. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
Companys significant estimates and assumptions primarily arise from risks and uncertainties
associated with potential future product returns, the uncollectibility of accounts and other
receivables, inventory obsolescence, valuation of acquired assets for purposes of allocating the
purchase price, including patents and goodwill, subsequent recoverability analysis, and estimated
accruals relating to legal contingencies. CONCENTRATION OF RISK: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and
accounts receivable. The Companys investment policy is to invest in low risk, highly liquid
investments. At December 31, 2004, ninety one percent (91%) of gross accounts receivable were due
from four customers. Additionally, approximately seventy percent (70%) of the Companys revenues
during 2004 were derived from three customers. The Companys business is dependent on its ability to utilize the underlying patents and a
third party manufacturer provides all of the Companys manufacturing capacity. The Company is also
dependent on the revenue from the sale of SinoFresh Nasal and Sinus Care, its only product
available for sale as of December 31, 2004. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturity
of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: All financial instruments are carried at amounts that
approximate fair value. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS: Accounts receivable result from the
sale of the Companys products at sales prices, net of estimated sales returns and other
allowances. The Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a specific
identification basis and additional allowances based on historical collections experience.
Accounts are considered past due when outstanding beyond the stated payment terms. The Company
will not write-off any account receivable until all reasonable means of collection have been
exhausted and collection does not appear probable. 34




---



##### Table of Contents



INVENTORIES: Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out
basis) or market and are evaluated for product obsolescence on a periodic basis (see note 3). DEFERRED DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS: Deferred debt issuance costs relate to placement agent fees and
legal fees associated with the convertible debentures (see note 6). The valuation of the warrants
utilized to pay these fees was computed using the Black-Scholes method and is being amortized over
the 24 month term of the debentures. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: Property and equipment are stated at cost. Equipment is depreciated
using the straight-line method over five to seven years (see note 4). PATENTS: Patents are stated at cost and are amortized over thirteen years (the approximate
life of the patents on the date of purchase) using the straight-line method (see note 5). GOODWILL: The Companys goodwill was established as a result of the asset acquisition (see
note 2). Goodwill is carried at lower of cost or market and is subject to annual impairment
evaluation, or interim impairment evaluation if an interim triggering event occurs which indicates
that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. Management believes that based on
testing performed in 2004, the Companys long-lived assets, including goodwill are not impaired. LONG-LIVED ASSETS: The Company reviews long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparison of its
carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to
generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured
by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property, if any, exceeds its fair market value. REVENUE RECOGNITION: In general, revenue from sales is recognized at the time products are
shipped less estimated sales returns, certain vendor cooperative promotional costs and other
allowances. Occasionally, new customers require the Company to initially ship product on a consignment
basis. Those verbal arrangements generally expire in one year or less depending on the product sell
through attained by the new customers. Consignment sales are not recognized until the customer
sells the product. MARKETING AND ADVERTISING EXPENSES: Included in marketing and advertising expenses are costs
associated with promoting the Companys product, public relations, conducting marketing studies and
other internal expenses. The Company uses television, radio and print as its primary forms of
media for product promotion. Product promotion costs were $913,385 and $641,212 for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In addition to media, the Company also promotes
its product through the services of a public relations firm and through entertainer, Ed McMahon.
Public relations expenses were $152,042 and $311,583 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. The Company has incurred $72,405 and $244,144 for the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for market studies and other internal related expenses. All costs
for advertising media is expensed in the period in which such media has been presented to its
targeted audience. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS: SinoFreshs policy is to expense all research and development
expenses as incurred. Research and development expenses during the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 totaled approximately $236,000 and $185,000, respectively. Substantial research and
development costs are anticipated for the development of line extensions to the SinoFresh Nasal &
Sinus Care product, including potential unrelated new products in the health care industry, in
general, and in the respiratory and infectious disease category, in particular. New product
development will be supported by clinical studies to ensure the safety and efficaciousness of the
Companys products, as well as for line extension derivatives of current and future products.
Additionally, extensive clinical and developmental testing is anticipated in connection with the
Companys development of new over-the-counter (OTC) and ethical drug products related to the
treatment of chronic sinusitis and other indications in the ear, nose and throat field. In
addition, the Company performs extensive research and 35




---



##### Table of Contents



development aimed at increasing the number of on-label claims it may include on its OTC
product and further documenting the efficacy of these products. SALES INCENTIVES AND CONSIDERATION PAID TO RETAILERS: The Company accounts for certain
promotional costs such as sales incentives, promotional funds, cooperative advertising and consumer
coupon redemptions as a reduction of net sales. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
Company had recorded approximately $545,000 and $350,000,
respectively, as a reduction of revenue
related to these costs. SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS: Shipping and handling costs are classified as a cost of sales and
those billed to customers are recorded as revenue on the consolidated statements of operations. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION: The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation
arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and complies with the disclosure provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS No. 123). Under APB No. 25, compensation cost is determined based on the
difference, if any, on the measurement date, which is generally the grant date, between the fair
value of the Companys stock and the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock (see note 7). The fair value of each stock option or warrant grant issued to non-employees is estimated on
the measurement date using either the fair value method of SFAS 123 or the Black-Scholes method of
SFAS 148 and is amortized over the related service period. Expenses recognized for such issuances
were approximately $173,000 and $706,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, respectively. The following table reflects proforma supplemental financial information related to
stock-based employee compensation, as required by SFAS No. 123 and SFAS 148: 2004
    
    
    2003Net loss, as reported
    
    $
    (3,706,280
    )
    
    $
    (3,769,315
    )Additional stock-based employee
compensation costs that would have
been included in the determination of
net loss if the fair value method
(SFAS No. 123) had been applied to
all awards
    
    
    (520,005
    )
    
    
    (143,208
    )Unaudited pro forma net loss, as if
the fair value method had been
applied to all awards
    
    $
    (4,226,285
    )
    
    $
    (3,912,523
    )Net loss per common share, as reported
    
    $
    (0.28
    )
    
    $
    (0.33
    )Unaudited pro forma net loss per
common share, as if the fair value
method had been applied to all awards
    
    $
    (0.31
    )
    
    $
    (0.34
    )
 The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options as of December 31, 2004 is 3.93
years. Options issued in 2004 were valued using the Black-Scholes method of SFAS 148. The
weighted average fair value of options granted in 2004 was $1.57 and consisted of 200,000 options
issued at market (weighted average fair value of $0.90), 350,000 options issued below market
(weighted average fair value of $1.96) and 5,000 options issued above market (weighted average fair
value of $0.90). In determining fair market value for options granted during 2004, the Company
assumed a risk-free rate of 3%, an expected life of 5 years, volatility ranging from 2.11 to 3.11
and no expected dividends. Options issued in 2003 were valued using the fair value method of SFAS 123. The fair market
value at the date of issuance was $1.00 for all options granted in 2003. 36




---



##### Table of Contents



INCOME TAXES: Deferred tax assets and liabilities and the resultant provision for income taxes
are determined based on the difference between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to
reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized when management determines that it is more likely than
not that the asset will be realized (see note 10). NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE: Basic net income (loss) per share and diluted net income (loss)
per share have been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the year. Assumed common stock equivalents were excluded from the net loss per share
computations, as their effect is antidilutive. Common stock equivalents could potentially dilute
basic earnings per share in future periods if the Company generates net income. At December 31,
2004 and 2003, there were 4,405,115 and 2,071,470 warrants issued,
respectively, to purchase common
stock. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were 1,574,375 and 1,099,625 options issued to purchase
common stock, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were 3,268,295 and 3,576,881
preferred shares, respectively, convertible to 5,712,795 and 6,295,592 common shares. At December
31, 2004 and 2003, there were outstanding debentures convertible into 3,327,273 and 0 common shares
which may dilute future EPS. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned operating subsidiary, SinoFresh Corporation. All inter-company
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. RECLASSIFICATIONS: Certain amounts in the 2003 financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the 2004 presentation. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In
March 2004, the FASB approved the consensus reached on the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments. The Issues objective is to provide guidance for identifying
other-than-temporarily impaired investments. EITF 03-1 also provides new disclosure requirements
for investments that are deemed to be temporarily impaired. In September 2004, FASB issued a FASB
Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-1-1 that delays the effective date of the measurement and recognition
guidance in EITF 03-1 until further notice. The disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 are effective
with this annual report for fiscal 2004. Once the FASB reaches a final decision on the measurement
and recognition provisions, the Company will evaluate the impact of the adoption of the accounting
provisions of EITF 03-1. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R
requires employee stock options and rights to purchase shares under stock participation plans to be
accounted for under the fair value method, and eliminates the ability to account for these
instruments under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, and allowed under
the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123R requires the use of an option pricing model
for estimating fair value, which is amortized to expense over the service periods. The
requirements of SFAS No. 123R are effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. If
the Company had applied the provisions of SFAS No.123R to the financial statements for the period
ending December 31, 2004, net loss would have increased by approximately $520,000. SFAS No. 123R
allows for either prospective recognition of compensation expense or retrospective recognition,
which may be back to the original issuance of SFAS No. 123 or only to interim periods in the year
of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating these transition methods. In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Inventory Pricing, for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) requiring
that those items be recognized as current-period expenses regardless of whether they meet the
criterion of so abnormal. This statement also requires that allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
The statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during the fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. Management does not expect this statement to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. 37




---



##### Table of Contents



In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment
of APB Opinion No. 29. APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, is based on
the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29, eliminating the exception to fair
value accounting for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with
general exception to fair value accounting for nonmonetary exchanges that do not have commercial
substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity
are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The statement is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Management
does not expect this statement to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations. NOTE 2: Asset and Business Acquisition On November 16, 2002 (Acquisition Date) SinoFresh  Delaware acquired the business and
substantially all of the assets of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. (the Seller) and assumed certain
liabilities in exchange for 808,170 shares of Series A preferred stock valued at $2.00 per share
based on SinoFresh  Delawares most recent private placements of preferred stock. During the year
ended December 31, 2003, additional acquisition costs related to legal expenses of approximately
$73,000 were capitalized to goodwill. In connection with the acquisition in November 2002, the Company entered into an agreement
with the founder of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. (and current CEO of the Company), whereby, the
Company was assigned the three U.S. patents covering the formulations for solutions related to
freshening the nose and throat with an antiseptic spray in exchange for 1,500,000 shares of
Series B preferred stock valued at $2.00 per share. The aggregate $3,000,000 fair value of the
intangible assets acquired was based on the contemporaneous cash sales price of Series C
preferred stock. The Company accounted for these acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business Combinations. The combined purchase price and acquisition
costs incurred through December 31, 2002 exceeded the fair value of net assets acquired by
approximately $2,337,000. The excess has been allocated to goodwill. NOTE 3: Inventories Inventories at December 31, 2004 consisted of the following: Finished Product
    
    $
    43,124Total
    
    $
    43,124
 The Company has an agreement with a third party, who is a registered Federal Drug
Administration and a cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices) qualified manufacturer, to
manufacture its products. This agreement, which expires in December 2005, provides for minimum
annual purchases by the Company of approximately $81,000 and provides the manufacturer with a
security interest in all products and proceeds thereof for which the manufacturer has not been
paid. NOTE 4: Furniture and Equipment Furniture and equipment at December 31, 2004 summarized by major classification is as follows: Furniture and Fixtures
    
    $
    75,485Computer Equipment
    
    
    73,055Warehouse Equipment
    
    
    9,267Less: Accumulated Depreciation
    
    
    (47,603
    )$
    110,204
 38




---



##### Table of Contents



Furniture and equipment included computer and warehouse equipment of approximately
$128,000 acquired under capital lease arrangements at December 31, 2004. Depreciation expense for
capitalized furniture and equipment was approximately $31,000 and $16,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. NOTE 5: Patents Patents as of December 31, 2004 consist of the following: Patents
    
    $
    3,000,000Less: Accumulated Amortization
    
    
    (480,753
    )$
    2,519,247
 Patents are being amortized over 13 years based on the estimated remaining legal life as of
the date of the acquisition of such patents. Amortization expense was approximately $231,000 and
$235,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for patents for each of the succeeding five
calendar years is approximately as follows: 2005
    
    $
    231,0002006
    
    $
    231,0002007
    
    $
    231,0002008
    
    $
    231,0002009
    
    $
    231,000
 The original valuation of the Companys patents was preformed by an independent valuation
specialist and involved the use of estimates related to the fair value of the patents. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company has evaluated it patents and has determined that there is no
impairment in such asset value. NOTE 6: Convertible Debentures and Capital Leases On December 7, 2004, the Company obtained financing in the total amount of $1,830,000 through
the sale of 2-year Senior Secured 6% Convertible Debentures (the Debentures) to various
institutional and private investors. The Debentures, which mature 2 years from the date of
issuance, are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company and its operating subsidiary,
SinoFresh Corporation (including the Companys patents and trademarks); and, the Debentures are
convertible at a conversion price of $.55 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions
contained in the terms of the Debentures. The Company reserved the right to require conversion of
the Debentures at any time after an effective registration statement if the closing bid price of
the Companys stock exceeds 300% of the conversion price then in effect for a period of 20
consecutive trading days. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears in cash; however, the Company
may make interest payments with common stock so long as the market price of the common stock at
such time is at least 115% of the then effective conversion price. The Companys subsidiary,
SinoFresh Corporation, entered into a guaranty agreement with the
investors, guaranteeing the
Companys performance under the financing documents. As an inducement to the Debenture holders, 1,663,645 warrants were issued at an exercise price
of $0.60. Debenture proceeds allocated to these warrants totaled $610,000 and are reflected as a
debt discount against the value of the total Debenture proceeds (see note 7). The debt discount is
being amortized to interest expense over the 24-month term of the Debentures. In
connection with the Debentures, the Company issued 320,000 warrants to a placement agent.
These warrants were valued at approximately $268,000 and are being amortized to interest expense
over the 24-month term 39




---



##### Table of Contents



of the Debentures. The Company also paid approximately $142,000 for
placement agent and other closing costs related to the Debentures. These costs have been recorded
as deferred debt issuance costs and are being amortized to interest
expense over the 24-month term
of the Debentures. In
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue Nos. 98-7 and 00-27, the convertible
Debentures are deemed to contain a beneficial conversion feature. The beneficial conversion
feature for the debenture transaction was estimated to be $1,220,000. Due to the Debentures being
immediately convertible, the beneficial conversion feature was fully expensed to interest expense
as of the date of issuance. At
December 31, 2004, long-term debt consisted of the following: 6% Secured convertible debentures
    
    $
    1,830,000Unamortized debt discounts
    
    
    (584,583
    )Capital lease obligations
    
    
    83,851$
    1,329,268Less current portion
    
    
    (22,191
    )$
    1,307,077
 Future minimum maturities of notes payable are as follows: Year Ended2005
    
    $
    22,1912006
    
    $
    1,853,8692007
    
    $
    23,5302008
    
    $
    14,261
 NOTE 7: Stockholders Equity Common Stock The holders of SinoFreshs common stock are entitled to equal dividends and distributions per
share with respect to the common stock when, as and if, declared by the board of directors from
funds legally available therefore. No holder of any shares of common
stock has a pre-emptive right
to subscribe for any of our securities, nor are any common shares subject to redemption or
convertible into other securities. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, and after
payment of creditors and preferred shareholders, if any, our assets will be divided pro rata on a
share-for-share basis among the holders of the shares of common stock. Each share of the common
stock is entitled to one vote with respect to the election of any director or any other matter upon
which shareholders are required or permitted to vote. We have authorized 500,000,000 shares of no
par value common stock. As of December 31, 2004, there are 14,097,120 shares issued and
outstanding and $132,000 warrant subscriptions receivable. During 2004, the Company issued 12,500 restricted common shares to an employee in connection
with an employment agreement and 200,000 restricted common shares to two service providers in
accordance with service agreements. In addition, 34,375 Series A preferred shares were converted
into 34,375 shares of common stock and 274,211 Series C preferred shares were converted in 548,422
shares of common stock. Preferred Stock Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 200,000,000 shares of blank
check preferred
stock with such rights and preferences as our board of directors, without further
shareholder approval, may determine from time to time. Of these authorized preferred shares, SinoFresh has designated
858,170 shares as Series A preferred stock, 1,500,000 shares as Series B preferred stock, and
1,250,000 shares as Series C preferred 40




---



##### Table of Contents



stock. All preferred stock ranks senior to common stock as
to payment of dividends and distribution of assets. Series A and B preferred stock ranks junior to
Series C preferred stock, and Series A preferred stock ranks junior to Series B preferred stock, as
to payment of dividends and distribution of assets. All three series of preferred stock have a
liquidation value of $2.00 per share. Series A preferred shares are convertible into common stock
on a one-for-one basis, while Series B and C preferred shares are convertible on a two-for-one
basis, and, all have voting rights equivalent to the common stock into which they are convertible.
In September 2004, the shares of common stock underlying the outstanding preferred stock became
eligible for resale under Rule 144. There are 823,795 shares of Series A preferred stock
outstanding, 1,500,000 shares of Series B preferred outstanding and 944,500 shares of Series C
preferred stock outstanding, as of December 31, 2004. Debentures In connection with a December 2004 financing, we issued $1,830,000 of senior secured 6%
convertible debentures which have a maturity date of December 5, 2006. The debentures are
convertible into 3,327,273 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.55 per share. The
debentures contain anti-dilution provisions under which the number of shares issuable upon
conversion of the debentures and the conversion price will be adjusted upon the sale by us of
common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock at prices below the
then existing conversion price of the debenture, the occurrence of stock splits, stock
distributions, and other corporate events. We may, at our option, require the conversion of all of
the debentures into shares of common stock provided that the market price of our common stock
exceeds 300% of the conversion price of the debentures then in effect for at least 20 consecutive
trading days and until delivery of a notice of mandatory conversion in accordance with the terms of
the debenture. Under the debentures, we are prohibited from taking certain corporate actions without the
written consent of the holders of the debentures, including the making of distributions on our
capital stock; the redemption or repurchase of our securities; the creation of any liability or
lien on our assets except borrowings existing or committed on December 6, 2004, obligations to
trade creditors or financial institutions incurred in the ordinary course of business, and loans to
repay the debentures; the sale or other disposition of any significant portion of our assets
outside of the ordinary course of business; the loaning or the advancing of any funds or credit,
except in connection with any such items in existence or committed on December 6, 2004, or made in
the ordinary course of business, or that are not in excess of $50,000 if made outside the ordinary
course of business; and create any contingent liabilities except those that are in existence on
December 6, 2004 or are made in the ordinary course of business. Warrants and Stock Options Warrants In connection with the debenture financing, we issued to the debenture holders and a placement
agent warrants to purchase 1,663,645 and 320,000 shares of common stock, respectively. The
warrants have an exercise price of $0.60 and $0.55 per share, respectively, and expire on December
6, 2009. The warrants contain anti-dilution provisions under which the number of shares issuable
upon exercise of the warrants and the exercise price will be adjusted upon the issuance of common
stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock at prices lower than the then
effective exercise price of the warrants, the occurrence of stock splits, stock distributions, and
other corporate events. The Company issued warrants to consultants and service providers in fiscal 2004 for a total of
350,000 shares of common stock, with exercise price ranging from $0.29 to $0.60 per share. The
warrants have terms of five years and vesting ranges from immediate to one year. The warrants
contain standard anti-dilution provisions pursuant to which the number of shares issuable upon
exercise of the warrants will be adjusted upon stock splits, stock distributions and the like.
These warrants were valued at approximately $225,000. We have outstanding additional warrants to purchase a total of 2,071,470 shares of common
stock. The warrants were issued in private placements and to consultants and vendors in respect of
services. The warrants have exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $7.00 per share, and expire at
varying times from February, 2005 through October, 2008. The warrants contain standard anti-dilution provisions pursuant to which the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants will be adjusted upon stock splits, stock
distributions and the like. 41




---



##### Table of Contents



Stock Options We have issued options to purchase 269,625 shares of common stock to independent consultants
at exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $1.50 per share. All of these options are currently
exercisable and expire at varying times between September 1, 2008 and July 7, 2009. Plan Stock Options We have reserved for options under our 2002 Stock Option Plan 3,000,000 shares of common
stock. As of December 31, 2004, there were outstanding options under the Plan for 1,304,750 shares
of common stock, at exercise prices ranging from $0.75 to $1.70 per share. Plan stock option activity was as follows during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Weighted AverageOptions
    
    
    Exercise PriceOutstanding at December 31, 2002
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Options granted
    
    
    831,000
    
    
    $
    1.00Exercised
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Expired or cancelled

    
    
    
    
    
    
    Outstanding  December 31, 2003
    
    
    831,000
    
    
    $
    1.00Options granted
    
    
    555,000
    
    
    $
    1.03Exercised
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Expired or cancelled
    
    
    (81,250
    )
    
    $
    1.00Outstanding  end of year
    
    
    1,304,750
    
    
    $
    1.01Exercisable as of December 31, 2004
    
    
    829,750
    
    
    $
    0.98
 In
November 2004, the Company agreed to fully vest all 200,000 options previously
issued to its Chief Financial Officer in recognition of his past
contributions. Of these options, 70,000 options were vested and
130,000 options were originally scheduled to vest in equal amounts in
September of 2005 and 2006. In November, 2003, the board of directors, by unanimous written consent, granted an option for
890,000 shares of stock to SinoFresh Management, LLC, a company owned by Stephen Bannon and Charles
Fust. At the time of the grant, not all board members were aware of the interest of the two
directors in that company. In April 2004, the Executive Committee declared that option invalid.
In July 2004, the Board of Directors, by majority vote, ratified the action taken by the Executive
Committee. NOTE 8: Related Party Information One of the Companys attorneys served as Secretary until April 2003. The Company had incurred
legal fees with this law firm of approximately $37,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. A director of the Company is the principal owner of a law firm that provided services to the
Company. The expenses incurred to that law firm were $20,000 and $277,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had $146,000
recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities due to this firm. A former director of the Company provided consulting services to the Company directly and
through his affiliate. The consultant resigned as director in
September, 2003. Consulting expenses
for this consultant while serving as director was $89,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. 42




---



##### Table of Contents



The Company incurred consulting fees to an entity affiliated with a former director/principal
stockholder. The director resigned in September, 2003. Expenses to this entity during the period
that this individual served as director totaled $227,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company leases its current facility from an entity controlled by two of the Companys
officers. Rent related to this facility began in August, 2003 and totaled $77,000 and $32,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively (see
note 9). As of December 31, 2004,
the Company had approximately $25,000 recorded in accounts payable due to this entity. In 2003, the Company paid approximately $30,000 in lease payments for vacated office space
that had been leased by an officer and director on behalf of a predecessor company. The
Company rented on a month-to-month basis from an officer and director at the sum of $1,250
per month a condominium apartment owned by the officer and director and which was used as corporate
housing by the Company. Total rent expensed in 2004 and 2003 was $6,250 and $7,500, respectively.
This arrangement was terminated as of June, 2004. During 2003, consulting fees paid to this
individual prior to her becoming an officer and a director approximated $10,000. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company expensed approximately $131,000 in legal
fees in connection with foreign patents owned by the Companys Chairman and CEO. The foreign
patents were assigned to the Company in 2004 (see note 9). NOTE 9: Commitments and Contingencies In October 2004, SinoFresh entered into an agreement with BestBet Media Group, Inc. to provide
the services of nationally known entertainer Ed McMahon for purposes of endorsing and promoting
SinoFresh products. The term of this agreement is for one year and is renewed automatically for
two additional one-year periods unless terminated by either party
with at least 90 days written
notice prior to the expiration of the then current term. Compensation for these services consists
of a $75,000 contract fee, warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of the Companys common stock at
$0.29 vesting in one year and expiring in five years and a royalty payment based on certain revenue
criteria. The value of the royalty payment cannot be presently determined. The Company entered into a five-year agreement to lease a new headquarters facility for a base
rate of $5,998 per month plus sales tax, effective April 2003, but did not move in or incur
expenses until August 2003. The property is leased from a company owned by two
officers/shareholders of the Company. The lease provides for two additional five-year terms with
the Company. The Company expensed approximately $77,000 and $32,000 during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to this lease. On
February 4, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to have a third party, who is a
registered Federal Drug Administration and a cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices) qualified
manufacturer, to manufacture its products. This agreement automatically renewed on December 31,
2004 for an additional one-year period. The agreement provides for minimum annual purchases by the
Company of approximately $73,500 and provides the manufacturer with a security interest in all
products and proceeds thereof for which the manufacturer has not been paid. Effective
March 1, 2003, the Company entered into a three-year master broker agreement with a
national company. Under this contract the master broker became the Companys exclusive broker, with
minor exception, to all retail accounts in the United States. The master broker is entitled to a
percentage of net revenues generated under this agreement. In addition, the master broker agreed
to develop a marketing plan and provide certain other services. The Company incurred approximately
$197,000 and $258,000 of fees for these services for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, and are included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. The Company is subject to operating leases for the use of certain office equipment. Rental
expense under these leases, amounted to approximately $11,000 and $6,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, 43




---



##### Table of Contents



respectively. Future noncancellable lease payments under these operating leases are $11,000
and $7,000 for the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. There are no equipment
operating lease obligations beyond 2006. At the time of the acquisition of the assets of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. (SinoFresh
Labs), the Company agreed to advance funds up to $50,000 in connection with litigation of
SinoFresh Labs pending at the time of the acquisition. The litigation has not been resolved and to
date the Company has expensed approximately $76,000 for this litigation. The Company has an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), which
provides, among other things, that if the Company issues additional shares, the CEO shall receive
options for the purchase of shares of the Company such that the CEO shall maintain no less than 15%
ownership of the Company. On February 20, 2004, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of
Florida, Ft. Myers Division, Case No. 04-CV-95-FTM-29 SPC, styled Hawkins, et al. vs. Charles Fust,
et al., and an amended complaint was filed on March 3, 2004 which merely changed allegations
directed toward the location where the action may be heard and noted that SinoFresh is a Florida
corporation. This legal proceeding was moved to the U.S. District Court located in Tampa, Florida.
The plaintiffs include Stephen Bannon and David Otto, directors of SinoFresh, as well as other
purported shareholders of SinoFresh. The defendants are Charles Fust,
Stacey Maloney-Fust, Robert
DuPont, Russell R. Lee, III (the companys former CFO), and SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. The
complaint alleges that it is a class action suit claiming federal securities law violations, breach
of fiduciary duty, rescission of certain acts and contracts of SinoFresh, and an accounting and
constructive trust, being brought by the lead plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all persons in
a class (other than the defendants) who purchased SinoFreshs publicly traded shares between
January 1, 2003 and February 19, 2004; however, the lawsuit was not certified as a class action
suit. In June 2004, the plaintiffs filed a corrected second amended complaint in the U.S. District
Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Case No. 8:04-CV-490-T-30MSS. This complaint
notes SinoFresh as a nominal defendant and adds the SinoFreshs corporate counsel as additional
defendants (seeking compensatory damages, including reimbursement of legal fees paid by SinoFresh).
The complaint alleges that it is a derivative suit, includes the same allegations as in the
original complaint, and also alleges, among other things, inadequate disclosure by the defendants
in SEC filings regarding related party transactions and regarding Mr. Fusts beneficial ownership
(wherein Mr. Fust reported ownership of the 1,000,000 shares of Crown IV Holdings portends to own),
all for the alleged purpose of the defendants maintaining control of
SinoFresh. In this complaint,
the plaintiffs request, among other things, that the Court appoint a special monitor during the
pendency of the litigation with authority to conduct investigations and issue a report to the
Court; that the Court enjoin the defendant directors from committing certain violations of Federal
securities laws, and from taking certain actions, including using corporate funds for the defense
of the directors in the suit, conducting transactions in SinoFreshs stock and soliciting proxies
for a 2004 annual meeting. In June 2004, SinoFresh filed a motion with the Court (a) requesting the Court to appoint an
independent person to make a good faith determination, after conducting a reasonable investigation,
as to whether it is in the best interests of SinoFresh to maintain the shareholder derivative suit,
and (b) requesting a stay of all proceedings in the case until the results of the investigation are
provided to the Court. The interim stay was granted and the Court granted the motion for
appointment of an independent investigator. The independent investigator commenced his
investigation in September 2004 and is due to report back to the Court no later than May 30, 2005. The complaint alleges, among other things, the following: (a) that Mr. Fust has not transferred foreign patents he holds to two foreign entities related
to SinoFresh through common ownership; (b) breach of fiduciary duty and self dealing by the individual defendants, including (i) the
payment of legal fees in connection with litigation involving SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. for
which SinoFresh Laboratories agreed to indemnify SinoFresh, (ii) payment of lease obligations on a
lease entered into by SinoFresh Laboratories and Charles Fust; (iii) failure to disclose to the
directors that SinoFreshs headquarters are owned by an entity 44




---



##### Table of Contents



controlled by Charles Fust and P. Robert DuPont; (iv) the payment of rent to Stacey
Maloney-Fust for a condominium she owned; (v) the granting of options to insiders; (vi) entering
into an employment agreement with Stacey Maloney-Fust without board approval; (vii) the objection
by Mr. Lee of Messrs. Bannon and Otto (whom the plaintiffs allege constituted the Companys audit
committee) having direct oversight over the auditor and having the auditor report directly to
Messrs. Bannon and Otto, and instead having the auditor report to Mr. Lee; (viii) removing Messrs.
Bannon and Otto as directors in order to prevent them from bringing the foregoing to the attention
of the auditor; (c) that there were certain enumerated defects with the Schedule 14C Information Statement
filed with the SEC; (d) that the Companys financial statements and the materials provided to the public, to the
shareholders and to the SEC do not properly reflect the Companys true financial condition, do not
reflect the foreign patents are not held by two foreign entities and do not reflect a fair
statement of the interim reporting periods of January 1 through September 30, 1993 [sic]. (The
plaintiffs also allege that during this time frame, the defendants failed to file financial
statements which conform to GAAP such that the financial statements will be presumably misleading
and inaccurate.) Management of SinoFresh investigated the complaint and believes the allegations in the
complaint to be false and misleading. SinoFresh disagrees with the allegations in the complaint
and SinoFresh, on behalf of itself and its officers and directors, intends to vigorously defend the
suit. The consolidated financial statements include no adjustment or provision related to the
foregoing matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot presently be determined. In March 2004, SinoFresh declared null and void two contracts entered into with Sargon
Capital, Inc., a shareholder and an affiliate of a former director and officer, to-wit: an
Investment Banking Services Agreement dated October 24, 2002, and a Financial Consulting Services
Agreement originally dated in November 2002 which monthly payments under this consulting agreement
approximate $8,000 with $96,000 due for the years 2003 and 2004, and $80,000 due for 2005. The
consulting agreement was revised September 8, 2003 extending the term of September 2006 and
increasing compensation to include 0.5% of gross revenue and 0.6% of net income before taxes,
interest and amortization. Sargon claimed that SinoFresh owes approximately $173,000 for these
services. In April 2004, a lawsuit was filed in Circuit Court for the 12th Judicial Circuit
in and for Sarasota County, Florida, styled Sargon Capital, Inc. and Andrew Badolato vs. SinoFresh
HealthCare, Inc., Charles Fust and John Hallman, Case No. 2004 CA3732SC. The complaint alleges a
breach of the financial consulting services agreement by failing to pay certain fees to Sargon
Capital, Inc. The complaint also alleges defamation of the principal
of Sargon Capital, Inc. and a
civil conspiracy to prevent Sargon Capital, Inc. from doing business in the State of Florida.
SinoFresh believes that the agreements were improperly approved, were breached by Sargon, and are
illegal because of the lack of appropriate licensure of Sargon. SinoFresh, on behalf of itself and
its officers and directors, intends to vigorously defend the suit. The consolidated financial
statements include no adjustment or provision related to the foregoing matters, the ultimate
outcome of which cannot presently be determined. Management of SinoFresh believes that both of the above-described lawsuits are a backlash by
Andrew Badolato and/or Sargon Capital, Inc. against SinoFresh in connection with the attempted
removal of Stephen Bannon and David Otto as board members and as officers of SinoFresh. Mr.
Badolatos company, Sargon Capital, Inc., had been retained by SinoFreshs predecessor for
investment banking and consulting services. Over the course of Mr. Badolatos and Sargons
association with SinoFresh, current management came to believe that it was in the best interests of
SinoFresh and its shareholders to sever ties with Mr. Badolato and Sargon. Since Messrs. Bannon
and Otto became Board members as a result of their introduction to
the Company by Mr. Badolato, Mr. Fust and other shareholders
deemed it in SinoFreshs best interests to attempt to remove them as directors and to seek substitute directors who were truly
independent from Mr. Badolato (and Sargon). 45




---



##### Table of Contents



Other Legal Proceedings A shareholder of SinoFreshs predecessor commenced an action against the predecessor
(SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc.), and certain of its former officers and directors, including Charles
Fust. In that action, the plaintiff is seeking recovery, through arbitration, of his investment of
$150,000. In addition, the plaintiff is seeking unspecified damages due to non-performance by
SinoFresh Labs of a consulting agreement entered into January 2000. The agreement was for five
years at $24,000 annually, of which $23,000 was paid. Under the terms of the asset purchase
agreement between SinoFresh-Delaware and SinoFresh Labs, SinoFresh-Delaware agreed to reimburse
SinoFresh Labs up to $50,000 in costs of defending this action, which agreement was assumed by
SinoFresh as a result of the merger. This lawsuit is being vigorously defended, but no outcome or
resolution of the arbitration or lawsuit is definitive or ascertainable at this time. Also in April 2004, a lawsuit was filed against SinoFresh by Bryan W. Miller in the Circuit
Court of the 11th Judicial Court in and for Dade County, Florida, Civil Division Case
No. 04-7960 CA 30, alleging that SinoFresh breached an agreement by failing to pay fees for a
broker financing arrangement. The complaint seeks damages of $120,000 plus interest and attorneys
fees. Although SinoFresh denies the allegations, a settlement was reached in January 2005 for
50,000 shares of SinoFresh common stock. The value of this stock on the settlement date was
$37,500 and is accrued as an expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of December 31, 2004. The Company has been unable to obtain from either former counsel to the Company or former
counsel to SinoFresh  Delaware, who were counsel of the Company and SinoFresh  Delaware at the
time of the merger, information the Company believes is sufficient to indisputably support one or
more exemptions from registration that were relied upon in connection with the issuance of the
merger shares. If such information is not available, the issuance of the shares of the Company in
respect of the merger may not have been in compliance with the registration provisions of the
federal and state securities laws. There may have been a violation of Section 5 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, due to the unavailability of an exemption from registration. As a result,
the Company may be exposed to claims for rescission by shareholders who received shares in the
merger. Although the Company would vigorously defend against any such actions, litigation may be
costly and there is no assurance of the outcome. From time to time, the Company is subjected to other litigation or proceedings in connection
with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant. There are no such pending legal proceedings
to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations. NOTE 10: Income Taxes At December 31, 2004, net operating losses available to be carried forward for federal income
tax purposes are approximately $9,400,000 expiring in various amounts through 2024. Utilization of
SinoFreshs net operating losses may be subject to substantial annual limitation due to the
ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions.
Such annual limitation could result in the expiration of the net operating loss before utilization. The Companys tax expense (benefit) differs from the expected tax expense (benefit) as
follows: 2004
    
    
    2003Computed expected tax expense (benefit)
    
    $
    (1,394,673
    )
    
    $
    (1,418,393
    )Losses for which no benefit is recorded
    
    
    1,405,468
    
    
    
    1,427,806Non-deductible
    
    
    (10,795
    )
    
    
    (9,413
    )$
    -0-
    
    
    $
    -0-
 46




---



##### Table of Contents



A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company has established a valuation allowance for
the entire deferred tax asset due to recurring losses since the Companys inception. 2004
    
    
    2003Deferred tax assets:Net operating loss carry forwards
    
    $
    3,027,597
    
    
    $
    1,622,129Less: valuation allowance
    
    
    (3,027,597
    )
    
    
    (1,622,129
    )Net deferred tax asset
    
    $
    -0-
    
    
    $
    -0-
 47




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 8.
    CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Effective March 4, 2004, SinoFresh dismissed Salberg & Company, P.A. (Salberg) as the
independent auditors of the Companys consolidated financial statements. The Company appointed
Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A., effective March 4, 2004, as its independent auditors. The
decision to change auditors was approved by the Companys Board of Directors on March 4, 2004 at
which time the Company believed that two of the formerly five board members had been previously
removed by shareholder written consents. Subsequent to such date, it was determined that there was
a technical deficiency in the written consents and as a result, two of the five Board members had
not been removed and therefore were still on the board. However, on March 29, 2004, at a meeting
of the full Board of Directors, a majority of the Board of Directors ratified and approved the
termination of Salberg and the appointment of Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. as the Companys
independent auditors effective March 4, 2004. In September 2003, the Company acquired SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the Delaware Company) by merger of that Delaware Company into SinoFresh Acquisition Sub, Inc., a
Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. SinoFresh Acquisition Sub
remained the surviving entity, changed its name to SinoFresh Corporation and is the operating
subsidiary of the Company. Post-merger, the Company filed a Form 8-K/A which included the
financial statements of the Delaware Company for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
audited by Salberg (which at the time of the merger became the Companys independent auditors),
together with unaudited financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The
consolidated financial statements of the Delaware Company are deemed the financial statements of
the Company post-merger. No report of Salberg on the Companys consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion,
nor was any such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting
principles. During Salbergs engagement and through the date of its letter, there were no
disagreement(s) with Salberg on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the
satisfaction of Salberg, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the
disagreement(s) in connection with its report. During Salbergs engagement and through the date of its letter, Salberg did not advise the
Company of any matters listed in paragraphs (1) through (3) of Item 304(a)(1)(iv)(B) of Regulation
S-B, except as follows: On February 26, 2004, Salberg requested, as an expanded audit procedure,
the engagement of an outside specialist to review accounting matters relating to a recently filed
lawsuit against the Company and its management. The Company did not disagree with Salbergs
request. However, the Company decided to instead replace Salberg with a larger accounting firm
that has more resources and personnel to complete the Companys audit of its 2003 consolidated
financial statements and also perform any expanded audit procedures the new accounting firm deems
appropriate. The Company authorized Salberg to respond fully to any inquiries about the foregoing
made by Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. The Company furnished Salberg with a copy of its above statements, filed with the SEC on an
amended Form 8-K on April 12, 2004 and which are duplicated herein, in response to Item 304(a)(1)
Regulation S-B and requested that Salberg furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the
Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC), stating whether or not it agrees with such statements. A
copy of Salbergs letter, dated March 30, 2004 is included as an exhibit to this report. 
 ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES As of the end of the period covered by this report, SinoFresh carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of SinoFreshs disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). This evaluation was
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of SinoFreshs management, including
SinoFreshs Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who concluded that SinoFreshs
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information required to
be disclosed is included in the reports that it files with the SEC. 48




---



##### Table of Contents



During the fourth fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report there were no
significant changes in SinoFreshs internal controls over financial reporting that materially
affected or is reasonable likely to materially affect SinoFreshs internal controls over financial
reporting. 
 ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION On
November 24, 2004, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K regarding the promotion
of Scott M. Klein to the offices of Chief Financial Officer and Secretary by board action on
November 18, 2004, and summarizing the salient terms of an employment agreement to be entered into
between the Company and Mr. Klein. The employment agreement was signed on March 28, 2005,
effective as of November 1, 2004. A copy of the employment agreement was filed with the SEC as an
exhibit to this annual report. The employment agreement provides for a 3-year term commencing as of November 1, 2004 with an
annual salary of $110,000, increasing to $120,000 on January 1, 2006 and $135,000 on January 1,
2007. Subject to milestones to be determined by the Company, the employment agreement also
provides for an annual bonus of 15% of Mr. Kleins base salary in effect at the end of each
calendar year. The employment agreement provides for a severance payment of six months of the base
salary then in effect if Mr. Klein is terminated by the Company without cause or if Mr. Klein
terminates the agreement for good reason as defined in the agreement. In connection with his
promotion to Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Klein was granted a 5-year option for 150,000 shares of
common stock with an exercise price of $.75 per share (which was the closing sale price of the
stock on November 1, 2004), vesting immediately as to 75,000 shares and the remaining 75,000 shares
will vest ratably over 3 years commencing on November 1, 2005. Mr. Kleins employment agreement
provides that he be granted additional 5-year options for 50,000 shares on November 1, 2005 and on
November 1, 2006, each at an exercise price that is the closing sale price of our common stock on
such dates, and these additional options will vest ratably over three years commencing on the date
of grant. 49




---



##### Table of Contents



PART III 
 ITEM 9. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SinoFreshs directors and executive officers are as follows as of February 28, 2005: Name
    
    Position
    
    AppointmentCharles A. Fust
    
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Director
    
    November, 2002P. Robert DuPont
    
    Vice President, Research and Development, Director
    
    November, 2002Scott M. Klein
    
    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
    
    November, 2004Stacey Maloney-Fust
    
    Senior Vice President, Assistant Secretary, Director
    
    September, 2003Stephen Bannon
    
    Director
    
    September, 2003David Otto
    
    Director
    
    October, 2002
 Charles A. Fust, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of the Board of Directors.Mr.
Fust, age 61, is a chemical engineer, whose research has resulted in
various domestic and
international patents, including the patents underlying the SinoFresh products. Mr. Fust began the
development of SinoFreshs products in 1989. His expertise in the health care community has
provided him with the opportunity to chair various health care boards, mainly Otorhinolaryngology
related. Mr. Fusts business background covers ownership and management in international
companies. Mr. Fust has been the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of SinoFresh Laboratories,
LLC from 1999 to the present Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of SinoFresh from November 2002
to the present. He holds a bachelor degree in Chemical Engineering from Auburn University and has
a professional affiliation with the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists. Mr. Fust is
the spouse of Stacey Maloney-Fust. P. Robert DuPont, Executive Vice President and Director.Mr. DuPont, age 40, has over twenty
years of experience in the bio-pharmaceutical and life sciences industries. Prior to joining
SinoFresh Laboratories, LLC in June of 2001, Mr. DuPont founded and acted in the capacity of CEO of
UltraPure Group Limited. UltraPure Group Limited provided integrated services to multi-national
pharmaceutical companies, which included design services, regulatory consultation, and contract
staffing. He founded the company in 1993 and sold his interest in the company in 2001. He is a
member of the International Society of Pharmaceutical Engineers and has presented various lectures
on the topic of pharmaceutical process design. Mr. DuPont is also a member of the American
Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists. Scott M. Klein, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.Mr. Klein, age 41, has nearly 20 years
experience in financial administration for private industry and in public accounting. Mr. Klein
joined SinoFresh in April, 2004 as a Controller and was promoted to Chief Financial Officer in
November, 2004. Prior to joining SinoFresh, Mr. Klein served three years as the CFO for ParView,
Inc., a privately held manufacturer of GPS technology for the golf industry. From 1992 to 2001, Mr.
Klein was the Corporate Controller for Elcotel, Inc., a publicly-held manufacturer of computerized
smart pay telephones. Prior to his private industry experience, Mr. Klein spent five years as an
auditor in public accounting at both Ernst & Young and Grant Thornton. Mr. Klein is a Certified
Public Accountant, licensed in the State of Florida and has a degree in Managerial Accounting from
the University of Wisconsin  Stevens Point. Stacey Maloney-Fust, Senior Vice President, Assistant Secretary, Director.Ms. Maloney-Fust,
age 40, joined SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. in July 2003. She has 14 years experience in the
financial industry. After attending New York University, Ms. Maloney-Fust obtained Series 7,
Series 63 and Series 65 securities licenses and was a Financial Advisor for Salomon Smith Barney
from April 2001 through April 2002, and for UBS from June 2002 until May 2003. Prior to that, she
was Executive Assistant to Merit Capital Associates, Inc. in the first quarter of 2001, Executive
Assistant to the General Partner of Sandler Capital Management from 1998 to 2000, and Executive
Assistant to the President of AIG Global Investors, Inc., all located in New York, New York. Ms.
Maloney-Fust is the wife of Charles Fust. 50




---



##### Table of Contents



Stephen Bannon, Director.Mr. Bannon, age 51, has been a director of SinoFresh since
September 2003. He is currently associated with American Vantage Media. Prior to his affiliation
with American Vantage Media, Mr. Bannon was employed at Jeffries & Company, Inc. during the period
July 2000 to April 2002 and with The Firm from May 2002 to March 2003. Prior to this, Mr. Bannon
was employed by SG Cowan Securities Corporation from July 1998 to March 2000. Mr. Bannon received
his MBA from Harvard University. He received his undergraduate degree from Virginia Polytechnical
Institutes College of Architecture and has a graduate degree in Government from Georgetown
University. David Otto, Director.Mr. Otto, age 46, has been a director of SinoFresh since September 2003
and was formerly an officer and director of SinoFresh  Delaware from October 2002. He was
Secretary to SinoFresh until March 29, 2004. In July of 1999, Mr. Otto founded The Otto Law Group,
PLLC, in Seattle, Washington. Prior to this, Mr. Otto was employed at Hughes, Hubbard and Reed.
Mr. Otto is currently chairman of the board of directors of Dtomi, Inc., and a member of the board
of directors of Renaissance Window Fashions, Inc., and Saratoga Capital Partners, Inc. Mr.
Otto is admitted to practice law in New York and Washington. Mr. Otto graduated from Harvard
University in 1981 with his A.B. in Government and his J.D. from Fordham University School of Law
in 1987. Our directors are elected at the annual meeting of the shareholders and serve until their
successors are elected and qualified, or their earlier resignation or removal. Officers are
appointed by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors or until
their earlier resignation or removal. Directors Compensation The directors do not receive any stated salary for their services as directors or members of
committees of the Board of Directors, but by resolution of the board, a fixed fee may be allowed
for attendance at each meeting. Directors may also serve the Company in other capacities as an
officer, agent or otherwise, and may receive compensation for their services in such other
capacity. Upon their election to the board, non-employee directors are paid $1,500 per day on days
board meetings are held, with an annual limit of $4,000. Reasonable travel expenses are
reimbursed. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires directors and executive
officers, and persons who own 10% or more of SinoFresh common stock, to file reports of ownership
and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are
required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, SinoFresh
believes that all filings were timely made by those persons who filed
reports. However, the Company notes that a copy of a Form 3 was not
received by the Company, nor does it appear to have been filed with
the SEC by either David N. Macrae or the David N. Macrae Trust, which
beneficially own over 10% of the Companys issued and
outstanding voting stock. Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers The Company has adopted a code of ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers (Code of
Ethics) which is required to be signed by each such officer, and is maintained on file by the
Company. A copy of the Code of Ethics will be provided to you, free of charge, upon your written
request to the Company sent to the attention of Investor Relations, SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., 516
Paul Morris Drive, Englewood, Florida 34223. If the Company makes any substantive amendments to the Code of Ethics, or grants any waiver,
including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics to the Chief Executive
Officer or the Chief Financial Officer, the Company will disclose the nature of such amendment or
wavier in a report on Form 8-K. Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert Three members of the Companys Board of Directors, Charles Fust, P. Robert DuPont and Stacey
Maloney-Fust, currently serve as the audit committee. The Audit Committee does not currently have
a financial 51




---



##### Table of Contents



expert. The Audit Committee will be reconstituted when the Company is able to recruit
independent directors with the appropriate financial experience and/or background to serve on such
committee and who are truly independent from internal and external influences, and independent
under NASDAQ or AMEX rules. 
 ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth all the compensation earned by the person serving as the Chief
Executive Officer (Named Executive Officer) during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 and any other officers who have earned greater than $100,000 in total salary and bonuses
during the 2004 or 2003 fiscal years. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Long-TermAnnual Compensation(1)
    
    
    Compensation AwardsName And Principal
    
    Fiscal
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Securities
    
    
    All OtherPosition
    
    Year
    
    Salary
    
    
    Bonus
    
    
    Underlying Options
    
    
    CompensationCharles A. Fust
    
    12/31/04
    
    $
    180,000
    
    
    $
    -0-
    
    
    
    -0-
    
    
    $
    15,286Chairman and Chief
    
    12/31/03
    
    
    150,388
    
    
    
    -0-
    
    
    
    -0-
    
    
    
    14,744Executive OfficerRussell R. Lee(2)
    
    12/31/04
    
    
    107,484
    
    
    
    21,500
    
    
    
    -0-Former Chief
    
    12/31/03
    
    
    40,000
    
    
    
    5,000
    
    
    
    200,000
    (3)Financial Officer
and Secretary
   (1)
    
    The amounts reflected in the above table do not include any amounts for perquisites and
other personal benefits extended to the Named Executive Officer. The aggregate amount of
such compensation for the Named Executive Officer is less than 10% of the total annual
salary and bonus.(2)
    
    Mr. Lee resigned on October 31, 2004.(3)
    
    On November 18, 2004, these options became fully exercisable by majority vote of the
Board. Stock Options Granted in Fiscal 2004 The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of options made during
fiscal 2004 to the Named Executive Officers. Number of
    
    
    
    
    
    FairSecurities
    
    Percent of Total
    
    Exercise
    
    MarketUnderlying
    
    Options Granted
    
    or Base
    
    Value onOptions
    
    to Employees in
    
    Price
    
    Date of
    
    ExpirationName
    
    Granted(#)
    
    2004
    
    ($/SH)
    
    Grant
    
    DateCharles A. Fust
    
    -0-
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    N/ARussell R. Lee
    
    -0-
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
 Aggregate Stock Option Exercises and Year-End Option Value Table The following table sets forth certain information concerning option exercises in fiscal 2004,
the number of stock options held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2004 and the
value (based on the fair market value of a share of stock at fiscal year-end) of in-the-money
options outstanding as of such date. 52




---



##### Table of Contents



Number ofSharesAcquired
    
    
    
    Number of Unexercised
    
    Value of Unexercisedon
    
    Value
    
    Options Held at Fiscal Year-
    
    In-the-Money Options at FiscalExercise
    
    Realized ($)
    
    End(#)
    
    Year-End(1)Name
    
    (#)
    
    (1)
    
    Exercisable
    
    Unexercisable
    
    Exercisable
    
    UnexercisableCharles A. Fust
    
    -0-
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    N/A
    
    
    N/ARussell R. Lee
    
    -0-
    
    N/A
    
    200,000
    
    -0-
    
    N/A
    
    
    N/A
   (1)
    
    Options are in-the-money if the fair market value of the common stock exceeds the
exercise price of the option. The closing sale price for the Companys common stock as
reported by the NASDAQ Trading and Market Services on December 31, 2004 was $0.68 per share. Employment Agreement As a result of the merger, the Company assumed the employment agreement between Charles Fust
and SinoFresh  Delaware dated December 1, 2002. The employment agreement has a term of five years
and is renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties. Under that agreement, he is entitled to a
base salary, as adjusted, of $180,000 annually and 5.0% of net earnings before taxes. In addition,
Mr. Fust is entitled to receive $1,000 per month car allowance. The agreement also provides that
the Company and Mr. Fust enter into a stock option agreement under which he would be provided
anti-dilution rights so that Mr. Fusts equity ownership of the Company, on a fully diluted basis,
will be no less than 15% so long as the total outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis are less
than 100,000,000. The agreement also prohibits Mr. Fust from competing with the Company for a
period of three years upon cancellation of the employment agreement. Russell R. Lee, the Companys former Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, left the Company
on October 31, 2004. The board of directors, by majority vote on
November 18, 2004, agreed to fully vest all of his options for 200,000 shares of common stock and approved the payment to him of an
earned bonus in the amount of $32,500, payable $12,500 in November 2004 and $4,000 per month
thereafter commencing December 2004 through April 2005. Directors Compensation Our directors do not receive any stated salary for their services as directors or members of
committees of the board of directors, but by resolution of the board, a fixed fee may be allowed
for attendance at each meeting. Directors may also serve the company in other capacities as an
officer, agent or otherwise, and may receive compensation for their services in such other
capacity. Upon their election to the board, non-employee directors are paid $1,500 per day on days
board meetings are held, with an annual limit of $4,000. Reasonable travel expenses are
reimbursed. Stock Option Plan The Companys Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors currently administer the 2002
Stock Option Plan (Plan). The Plan provides for the grant of options (incentive and non-statutory),
to officers, employees and independent contractors capable of contributing to the Companys
performance. The Company has reserved an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock for grants
under the Plan. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees eligible to receive them
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had
outstanding non-statutory options for 1,304,750 shares of the Companys common stock. These options
have a term of five years from the date of grant, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the
provisions of the Plan and applicable stock option agreements. The exercise prices of all of the
options granted as of December 31, 2004 range from $0.75 to $1.70 per share. The options generally
have scheduled vesting except 53




---



##### Table of Contents



for options for 446,000 shares, which either vested immediately upon grant or were
subsequently accelerated by the Board. Upon expiration or termination of unexercised options, the
unpurchased shares subject to such options will again be available for purposes of the Plan. REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION General During fiscal year 2004 and currently, Charles Fust, P. Robert DuPont and Stacey Maloney-Fust
constitute the Compensation Committee. Each Compensation Committee member is an employee-director
of the Company. The board intends to reconstitute the Compensation Committee to include
non-employee directors when individuals join the board who are independent of internal and external
influences and who are independent as defined under NASDAQ or AMEX rules. The Board of Directors, upon recommendations made by the Compensation Committee, determines
option grants. The Board monitors corporate performance and its relationship to compensation for
executive officers and makes determinations concerning matters of executive compensation. The
Compensation Committee determines salaries and incentive cash bonuses for non-executive employees. Compensation Philosophy The Company has developed and implemented a compensation program that is designed to attract,
motivate, reward and retain the broad-based management talent required to achieve the Companys
business objectives and increase shareholder value. There are two major components of the
Companys compensation program: base salary and incentives, each of which is intended to serve the
overall compensation philosophy. Base Salary The Companys salary levels for executive officers, including its Chief Executive Officer, are
intended to be consistent with competitive pay practices of similarly-sized companies within the
industry. In determining executive officers salaries, the board considers level of
responsibility, competitive trends, the financial performance and resources of the Company, general
economic conditions, as well as factors relating to the particular individual, including overall
job performance, level of experience and prior service, ability, and knowledge of the job. Incentives Incentives consist of stock options and performance bonuses paid in cash. The board strongly
believes that the compensation program should provide employees with an opportunity to increase
their ownership and potential for financial gain from increases in the Companys stock price. This
approach closely aligns the best interests of shareholders and, executives and employees.
Therefore, executives and other employees are eligible to receive stock options, giving them the
right to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at a specified price in the future.
Currently, upon recommendations made by the Compensation Committee, the Board determines stock
option grants. The grant of options is based primarily on an individuals past performance and
potential future contribution to the Companys growth and profitability. Respectfully submitted,THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEECharles A. FustP. Robert DuPontStacey Maloney-Fust
 54




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 11.
    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
shares of voting stock as of February 15, 2005 by: (i) each person who is known by us to
beneficially own more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (ii) the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; (iii) the directors; and (iv) all of the executive officers
and directors as a group. For purposes of the beneficial ownership calculations below, the Series
A preferred stock, which is convertible into common stock on a 1-for-1 basis, the Series B
preferred stock, which is convertible into common stock on a 2-for-1 basis, and Series C preferred
stock, which is convertible into common stock on a 2-for-1 basis are included on an as converted
basis such that the total issued, issuable and outstanding voting stock becomes 19,809,915. Unless
otherwise indicated, the persons named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to
all shares beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable. Name of Beneficial Owner(1)(2)
    

    
    No. of shares
    
    PercentageCharles A. Fust, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
    

    7,901,400
    (3)(10)
    
    
    39.79
    %P. Robert DuPont, Executive Vice President and a Director
    

    406,000
    (4)
    
    
    2.03
    %Scott M. Klein, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
    

    75,000
    (5)
    
    
    *Stacey Maloney-Fust, Senior Vice President and a Director
    

    55,000
    (11)
    
    
    *David Otto, Director(6)
    

    
    
    50,000
    
    
    
    *Stephen Bannon, Director(7)
    

    425,000
    (8)
    
    
    2.14
    %Moty Hermon
    

    1,229,723
    (9)
    
    
    6.21
    %David N. Macrae Trust
    

    2,452,990
    (12)(13)
    
    
    11.59
    %David N. Macrae
    

    2,486,323
    (14)
    
    
    11.73
    %All officers and directors as a group (6 persons)
    

    8,857,400
    (15)
    
    
    44.00
    %
   *
    
    Represents less than 1% of all issued and outstanding voting stock of SinoFresh.(1)
    
    Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person or entity listed is c/o SinoFresh
HealthCare, Inc., 516 Paul Morris Drive, Englewood, FL 34223.(2)
    
    Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and
generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common
stock subject to options, warrants or convertible securities that are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of February 15, 2005, are deemed outstanding for computing the
percentage of the person holding such options, warrants or convertible securities but are not
deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Except as indicated by
footnote and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown
as beneficially owned by them.(3)
    
    Represents 4,846,400 shares of common stock owned by the Charles Fust Family Limited
Partnership, for which a corporation Mr. Fust owns is the general partner; 3,000,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of 1,500,000 shares of Series B preferred stock held by
the Charles Fust Family Limited Partnership, which shares of Series B preferred stock vote on
an as converted basis; 5,000 shares of common stock owned by his spouse; and 50,000 shares of
common stock issuable pursuant to options exercisable by his spouse, Stacey Maloney-Fust,
within the next 60 days.(4)
    
    Represents 250,000 shares of common stock, 10,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon conversion of 10,000 shares of Series A preferred stock, and 146,000 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to options exercisable within the next 60 days.(5)
    
    Represents 75,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options exercisable
within the next 60 days. 55




---



##### Table of Contents



(6)
    
    Mr. Ottos address is 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3140, Seattle, WA 98164.(7)
    
    Mr. Bannons address is 1819 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90404.(8)
    
    Represents 375,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 shares of common stock issuable
pursuant to options exercisable within the next 60 days.(9)
    
    Represents 1,229,723 shares of common stock Mr. Moty Hermon has a right to acquire
from Mr. Fust pursuant to a put option, which shares of stock have been deposited into escrow
by Mr. Fust for the benefit of Mr. Hermon. Mr. Fust holds a proxy to vote the escrowed
shares.(10)
    
    Crown IV Holding, Inc., a Belize corporation (Crown IV) has indicated to the
Company and Charles Fust that it is the owner of 1,000,000 shares of common stock to which Mr.
Fust claims beneficial ownership. In 2002, the Companys predecessors had retained Sargon
Capital, Inc. (a company affiliated with Andrew Badolato) to provide financial advice. At
that time, Sargon Capital/Andrew Badolato advised Mr. Fust to put his assets into various
off-shore entities, including some of his stock in SinoFresh  Delaware. In connection with
the acquisition of the assets of SinoFresh Laboratories by SinoFresh  Delaware, a company
formed by Sargon Capital/Andrew Badolato, Mr. Fust was to be issued 6,000,000 (post-merger)
shares of common stock for joining SinoFresh  Delaware. Mr. Fust designated some of those
shares for employees and, pursuant to recommendations of Sargon Capital/Andrew Badolato,
1,000,000 (post-merger) shares were to be put into an off-shore entity, Crown IV, that Mr.
Fust understood to have been created for his benefit and as such, he was the beneficial owner
of those shares. A share certificate for 1,000,000 (post-merger) shares was issued in the
name Crown IV by SinoFresh  Delaware which Mr. Fust held and did not deliver to Crown IV
since he had not been provided any paperwork or other information about Crown IV and he had
not yet consulted with his legal advisors regarding same. Later, upon seeking the advice of
his personal attorney, it was recommended that he not transfer any property to any off-shore
entities but instead transfer property only to his family limited partnership, which he did.
Thus, he did not release the share certificate to Crown IV, but instead voided the certificate
that was in the name of Crown IV and requested the Companys transfer agent to issue a
certificate for the shares in the name of the Charles Fust Family Limited Partnership;
however, he subsequently requested the transfer agent instead to issue the certificate in the
name of the escrow agent who is holding 1,229,723 shares in escrow for the benefit of Moty
Hermon pursuant to an agreement between Mr. Fust and Mr. Hermon. Mr. Fust holds a proxy to
vote the escrowed shares. Since the attempted removal of Messrs. Bannon and Otto from the
board, Crown IV has made demands for the 1,000,000 (post-merger) shares and a representative
of Crown IV has threatened to file a suit against Charles Fust, the Company and its counsel in
connection with these shares.(11)
    
    Represents 5,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 shares of common stock issuable
pursuant to option exercisable within the next 60 days. Excludes 7,846,400 beneficially owned
by her spouse, Charles Fust, an executive officer and director of the Company.(12)
    
    Represents 1,104,170 shares of common stock, 894,274 shares of common stock
issuable pursuant to warrants exercisable within the next 60 days, and 454,546 shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of a debenture that is convertible within the next 60
days.(13)
    
    Mr. Macraes address is 621 Casey Key Rd, Nokomis, FL 34275.(14)
    
    Represents 33,333 shares of common stock purchase warrants that are exercisable
within the next 60 days, and the following securities held by the David N. Macrae Trust for
which Mr. Macrae is the trustee: 1,104,170 shares of common stock, 894,274 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to warrants exercisable within the next 60 days, and 454,546 shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of a debenture that is convertible within the next 60
days.(15)
    
    Represents 5,526,400 shares of common stock; 3,000,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of 1,500,000 shares of Series B preferred stock; 10,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of 56




---



##### Table of Contents



10,000 shares of Series A preferred stock; and 321,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options that are
exercisable within the next 60 days. 
 ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS SinoFresh contracted with Sargon Capital, Inc. (Sargon) for certain investment banking and
consulting services to be provided pursuant to two agreements between the Company and Sargon.
Sargon is affiliated with Andrew Badolato and they each are shareholders of the Company. The
Company has terminated the agreements with Sargon. In April 2004, the principals of Sargon filed
a complaint alleging a breach of the consulting services agreement by failing to pay certain fees.
SinoFresh plans to vigorously defend this claim. See the Legal Proceedings section for further
discussion. SinoFreshs office facility at 516 Paul Morris Drive, Englewood, Florida, is leased from
DuPont and Fust Real Estate Ventures, LLC, which is owned by 50% P. Robert DuPont, the Vice
President of Research & Development and a member of our board of directors, and 50% by Charles
Fust, the Chairman and CEO. SinoFresh entered into a 5-year lease at a base rent of $5,998.00 per
month (plus sales tax), effective April 2003, but did not move in or incur expenses until August
2003. The lease provides for two additional five-year terms at the option of SinoFresh. The Otto Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, Washington, represented the Company and SinoFresh 
Delaware on legal matters and billed the Company for legal services pursuant to an engagement
agreement. David Otto of The Otto Law Group, PLLC, is a shareholder and a member of the Board of
Directors of the Company and was formerly the Companys General Counsel and Secretary. In fiscal
2004 and 2003, The Otto Law Group, PLLC billed the Company approximately $20,000 and $277,000,
respectively for legal fees and expenses. The Company rented on a month to month basis from Stacey Maloney-Fust at the sum of $1,250 per
month, a condominium apartment owned by Ms. Fust and which was used as corporate housing by the
Company. Total rent expensed in 2004 and 2003 was $6,250 and $7,500, respectively. This
arrangement was terminated as of June, 2004. During 2003, consulting fees paid to this Ms. Fust
prior to her becoming an officer and a director approximated $10,000. In 2003, the Company paid approximately $30,000 in lease payments for office space in Ft.
Lauderdale, Florida that had been leased by Charles Fust on behalf of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. At the time of the acquisition of the assets of SinoFresh Laboratories, Inc. (SinoFresh
Labs), the Company agreed to advance funds up to $50,000 in connection with litigation of
SinoFresh Labs pending at the time of the acquisition. The litigation has not been resolved and to
date the Company has expensed approximately $76,000 for this litigation. At the time of the acquisition of SinoFresh Labs, the Company issued to Charles Fust 1,500,000
(postmerger) shares of Series B Preferred Stock for the transfer of his U.S. patents to the
Company, and issued 6,000,000 (post-merger) shares of common stock to Charles Fust and certain of
his designees in connection with Mr. Fusts employment with the Company. The Company also expensed
approximately $131,000 in 2003 on behalf of Mr. Fust in connection with the registration and
maintenance of certain foreign patents. The foreign patents have been subsequently assigned to the
Company. 
 ITEM 13. EXHIBITS LIST AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K A. Exhibits The exhibits in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this Report on Form 10-KSB
or are incorporated by reference. 57




---



##### Table of Contents



B. Reports on Form 8-K Form
    
    Description
    
    Filing Date8-K
    
    Letter to Shareholders
    
    9/22/048-K
    
    Press Release: Announcement of Ed McMahon as Product Endorser
    
    10/19/048-K
    
    Unregistered Sales of Securities
    
    10/22/048-K
    
    Resignation of Chief Financial Officer
    
    10/29/048-K
    
    Press Release: Third Quarter 2004 Financial Results
    
    11/03/048-K
    
    Appointment of New Chief Financial Officer
    
    11/24/048-K
    
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Unregistered
    
    12/10/04Sales of Equity Securities and Press Release related to Same
 
 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Audit Fees The Company was billed by its accountants approximately $188,000 and $79,000 during the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively for fees and expenses related to professional
services rendered in connection with the year end audits of the consolidated financial statements
and reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements. Audit-Related Fees The Company was not billed any additional fees that are not disclosed under audit fees in each
of the last two calendar years for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of the Companys consolidated financial statements. Tax Fees Fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including the preparation of certain tax
returns for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $18,000 and $0,
respectively. All Other Fees There have been no other material fees charged for accounting products or services other than
those described above for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Audit Committee Pre-Approval Process, Policies and Procedures The appointment of Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. was approved by the Board of Directors as the
principal auditors for the Company. Three members of the Companys Board of Directors, Charles
Fust, P. Robert Dupont and Stacey Maloney-Fust, currently serve as the audit committee until the
Company is able to recruit independent directors with the appropriate financial experience and/or
background to serve on such committee and who are truly independent from internal and external
influences, as well as independent under NASDAQ or AMEX rules. Although two directors, Messrs.
Stephen Bannon and David Otto, are non-employee directors, the Board of Directors of the Company
did not formally appoint by resolution or otherwise an audit committee until March 29, 2004. When
independent directors with the appropriate financial background join the board, the board plans to
establish a new audit committee, which will then adopt an appropriate charter and pre-approval
policies and procedures in connection with services to be rendered by the independent auditors. 58




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, SinoFresh
HealthCare, Inc. has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized. SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC./s/ Charles A. FustCharles A. FustChairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) Date: March 28, 2005 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report
has been signed by the following persons on its behalf of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. And in the
capacities indicated. Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Charles A. Fust
    
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    
    March 28, 2005Charles A. Fust
    
    (principal executive officer)/s/ Scott M. Klein
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
    
    March 28, 2005Scott M. Klein
    
    (principal financial officer)/s/ P. Robert DuPont
    
    Executive Vice President; Director
    
    March 28, 2005P. Robert DuPont/s/ Stacey Maloney-Fust
    

    Senior Vice President; Assistant Secretary; Director
    
    March 28, 2005Stacey Maloney-FustStephen Bannon
    
    Director
    
    March ___, 2005David Otto
    
    Director
    
    March ___, 2005
 59




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index Exhibits Number
    
    
    Description2.1
    
    
    Merger Agreement dated September 8, 2003 (1)3.1
    
    
    Articles of Incorporation (2)3.1.1
    
    
    Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (3)3.2
    
    
    Bylaws (2)3.2.1
    
    
    Amendment to Bylaws*4.1
    
    
    Form of Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement (3)4.2
    
    
    Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement with D&J Properties (3)4.3
    
    
    Registration Rights Agreement with InvestLinc Equity Fund II, LP,
InvestLinc Emerging Growth Equity Fund I, LLC and The Invest Line
Group, Inc. dated November 15, 2002 (4)4.4
    
    
    Form of 2003 Warrant Agreement issued to warrant investors for 1,333,970
warrants, dated September 8, 2003(4)4.5
    
    
    Cancelable Warrant Agreement with Dave Macrae Trust dated September 1, 2003 (4)4.6
    
    
    2004 Warrant Agreement with Dave Macrae Trust dated as of September 1, 2004 (4)4.7
    
    
    Warrant Certificate dated November 15, 2002 in favor of The InvestLinc Group (4)4.8
    
    
    Warrant issued to BestBet Media Group, Inc., dated October 1, 2004 (6)4.9
    
    
    Warrant issued to Reno Rolle, dated August 19, 2004. (6)4.10
    
    
    Warrant issued to Ed McMahon, dated October 1, 2004. (6)4.11
    
    
    Registration Rights Agreement with Reno Rolle, dated August 19, 2004. (6)4.12
    
    
    Registration Rights Agreement with BestBet Media Group, Inc., dated October 1,
2004. (6)4.13
    
    
    Form of Warrant issued to Debenture investors for a total of 1,663,645 shares of
common stock, dated December 6, 2004 (7)4.14
    
    
    Registration Rights Agreement with Debenture investors, dated December 6, 2004.
(7)4.15
    
    
    Warrant issued to Bristol Investment Partners I, dated September 8, 2003(8)
 60




---



##### Table of Contents



Number
    
    
    Description4.16
    
    
    Warrant issued to Bristol Investment Partners I, dated September 8, 2003(8)4.17
    
    
    Warrant issued to Bristol Investment Partners LP I, as of December 6, 2004(8)4.18
    
    
    Warrant issued to Michael Gottlieb, dated January 5, 2005(8)4.19
    
    
    Warrant issued to Michael Gottlieb, dated January 5, 2005(8)4.20
    
    
    Form of Warrant issued to Medical Advisory Board(8)4.22
    
    
    Warrant issued to D&J Properties, LLC, dated June 19, 2003(8)4.23
    
    
    Warrant issued to D&J Properties, LLC, dated June 19, 2003(8)4.24
    
    
    Warrant issued to David N. Macrae, dated as of September 1, 2003(8)4.25
    
    
    Warrant issued to Tim Kepler, dated as of November 7, 2003(8)4.26
    
    
    Form of Debenture issued to Debenture investors, dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.1
    
    
    Contract Manufacturing Agreement between SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and AccuMed,
Inc. (3)10.2
    
    
    Agreement with Bristol Investment Group, Inc. dated February 7, 2003 (3)10.3
    
    
    Employment Agreement with Charles Fust dated December 1, 2002 (3)10.5
    
    
    Proprietary Development, Right of First Refusal and Acquisition Agreement with
SinoFresh Research Laboratories, LLC (3)10.6
    
    
    Investment Banking Services Agreement with Sargon Capital, Inc. dated October 24,
2002 (3)10.7
    
    
    Financial Consulting Services Agreement with Sargon Capital, Inc., dated
September 8, 2003 (3)10.8
    
    
    National In-Store Agreement dated November 21, 2002 (3)10.9
    
    
    National In-Store Sales and Broker Agreement dated March 27, 2003 (3)10.10
    
    
    Agreement with David Farr dated October 9, 2003 (3)10.11
    
    
    Accounts Receivable Financing Agreement with Alliance Financial Capital, Inc. (3)10.12
    
    
    Agreement with Rubenstein Communications, Inc., dated March 18, 2003 (3)10.13
    
    
    Lease Agreement with DuPont & Fust Real Estate Ventures, LLC dated April 1, 2003
(9)10.14
    
    
    Allonge to Promissory Note dated February 1, 2001, in favor of Invest Linc Equity
Fund II (4)10.15
    
    
    Allonge to Promissory Note dated February 1, 2001, in favor of Invest Linc
Emerging Growth Equity Fund I, LLC (4)
 61




---



##### Table of Contents



Number
    
    
    Description10.16
    
    
    Assumption Agreement dated November 15, 2002 in favor of Invest Linc Equity
Fund II, Invest Linc Emerging Growth Equity Fund I, LLC (4)10.17
    
    
    Consulting Agreement with The Invest Linc Group, LLC dated November 15, 2002 (4)10.18
    
    
    Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 15, 2002 with Invest Linc Equity Fund
II, Invest Linc Emerging Growth Equity Fund I, and The Invest Linc Group (4)10.19
    
    
    SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (3)10.19.1
    
    
    Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 2002 Stock Option Plan*10.20
    
    
    Agreement with Moty Herman dated October 21, 2003 (4)10.21
    
    
    Agreement between Charles Fust and Moty Herman dated October 22, 2003 (4)10.22
    
    
    Supplemental Letter Agreement with Moty Herman dated October 28, 2003 (4)10.23
    
    
    Letter Agreement from Charles Fust dated April 12, 2003 re Moty Herman Agreements
(4)10.24
    
    
    Teaming Agreement with Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, dated April 28,
2004 (5)10.25
    
    
    Securities Purchase Agreement with Debenture investors, dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.26
    
    
    Form of Convertible Debenture issued to investors for total of $1,830,000, dated
December 6, 2004 (7)10.27
    
    
    Security Agreement with Debenture investors, and Bushido Capital Partners, L.P,
as agent, dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.28
    
    
    Subsidiary Security Agreement between SinoFresh Corporation, Debenture investors
and Bushido Capital Partners, L.P., as agent, dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.29
    
    
    Intellectual Property Security Agreement with Debenture investors, and Bushido
Capital Partners, L.P., as agent, dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.30
    
    
    Subsidiary Intellectual Property Security Agreement between SinoFresh
Corporation, Debenture investors, and Bushido Capital Partners, L.P., as agent,
dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.31
    
    
    Guaranty Agreement by SinoFresh Corporation in favor of Debenture investors,
dated December 6, 2004 (7)10.32
    
    
    Strategic Planning Services Agreement with David Macrae, dated September 5,
2003(8)10.33
    
    
    Employment Agreement for Scott M. Klein, dated March 28, 2005 as of and effective
November 1, 2004*10.34
    
    
    Form of Non-Plan Option Agreement*16.1
    
    
    Letter from Salberg & Co. dated March 30, 2004 *
 62




---



##### Table of Contents



Number
    
    
    Description21.1
    
    
    Subsidiaries of the Registrant*31.1
    
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*31.2
    
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*32.1
    
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*32.2
    
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
   *
    
    Filed herewith.(1)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 8-K, filed on September 23, 2003.(2)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 10-QSB, filed on April 29, 2002, File No.
0-49764.(3)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2003, filed on November 17, 2003, File No. 0-49764.(4)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003, filed on April 14, 2004, File No. 0-49764.(5)
    
    Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2004, filed on May 17, 2004, File No. 0-49764.(6)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 8-K dated October 18, 2004, filed on October
22, 2004, File No. 0-49764.(7)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 8-K dated December 6, 2004, filed on December
10, 2004, File No. 0-49764.(8)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Form SB-2 Registration Statement filed on January
6, 2005, File No. 333-121880.(9)
    
    Incorporated by reference to Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 Registration
Statement filed on January 27, 2005, File No. 333-121880. 63