alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Howard Abrams, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Java Express, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: June 6, 2007 /s/ Howard Abrams Howard Abrams Principal Financial Officer
EX-4.11



 EXHIBIT 4.11 

Third Amendment to 

Alion Science and Technology Corporation 

Employee Ownership, Savings and Investment Plan 

(As Amended and Restated Effective October 1, 2011) 

WHEREAS, Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Alion Science and Technology Corporation Employee
Ownership, Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of its employees and employees of other adopting employers, and was last amended and restated as of October 1, 2011; and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to Plan Section 15.1 of the Plan, has delegated authority to amend the Plan to
the undersigned officer, provided he determines that the amendment would not materially increase costs of the Plan to the Company or any Adopting Employer; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to exclude from participation in the Plan employees hired or re-hired on or after
October 1, 2014 whose employment is covered by the Service Contract Act. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers of amendment
reserved under Section 15.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by the Company, effective as of the date of adoption set forth below, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2.17 is amended by adding a new subsection (e) thereto, to provide as follows, effective October 1, 2014: 

  

	 	    	“(e) An Employee whose most recent date of hire is on or after October 1, 2014 and whose employment is covered by the Service Contract Act.” 


 

	 	2.	Section 4.2 is amended by adding the following new sentence to the end thereto, effective October 1, 2014: 

  

	 	    	“Contributions shall not be made pursuant to this Section 4.2 for Employees whose most recent date of hire is on or after October 1, 2014.” 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Alion Science and Technology Corporation has caused this Second Amendment to the Plan to be executed on its behalf by the
Chief Executive Officer as of the 28th day of March, 2014. 
  

			
	Alion Science and Technology Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ Bahman Atefi
	Name:	 	Bahman Atefi
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00632

- CV

IN RE FUNDING PARTNERS, L.P., FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP Solutions, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, Inc., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, Inc., Dash Partners, LP and Prospect, L.L.C.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR ABATEMENT AND RESETTING DEADLINES DENIED

The court has considered the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by relator s on August

31, 2011 , and the response of the real part ies in interest and is of the opi nion that relief should be

denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators ’ petition for a writ of mandamus and

the joint motion for abatement of the underlying case and resetting of the deadlines in the

scheduling order are hereby denied.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009

- CI

- 03462 , styled Javier A. Pena d/b/a Phi Contractors and d/b/a Phi Services and Juan Garcia v. Funding Partners, L.P. a/k/a FP Asset Group, L.P.; SPT Investments, Inc.; James R. Martzall; Acquisition Funding Source, Inc.; FPIC, L.L.C.; Jeap Solutions, L.L.C.; DPIC, L.L.C.; DPLS, L.L.C.; D PLS II, L.L.C.; FBP, Inc.; FPLS, L.L.C.; FPLS II, L.L.C.; FPMB, Inc.; Prospect, L.L.C.; and Dash Partners, LP

, pending in the 57th Judicial District Cou rt , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.04

- 11

- 00632

- CV

- 2

- Relat ors shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding. The clerk of this court is directed

to transmit a copy of this opinion to the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial

court clerk.

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review R01 & R34.                    

*Date:*                         October 12, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, NIH 6701 Democracy Blvd, room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-594-4809,                         *mary_kelly@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 20, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-21281 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Sandra Kay LONG, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lemuel Jackson LONG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9429.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District.

Jan. 30, 1973.

*28John F. Low, Lebanon, for plaintiff-respondent.

J. W. Grossenheider, Lebanon, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-husband has appealed from a decree of the Circuit Court of Camden County. Plaintiff-wife was granted a divorce and monthly alimony, custody of the parties’ minor daughter and child support, and, an allowance for her attorney fees.

The husband contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to continue the case on the date of the trial after he discharged his attorney and the latter was permitted to withdraw.

The case had been set for trial for approximately two and one-half months and was shown set for trial in the printed docket. The husband and his attorney appeared on the scheduled trial date. Following the departure of his attorney the husband remained in the courtroom while the wife presented her evidence. He declined the court’s invitation to interrogate the wife and offered no evidence in his behalf.

We have reviewed the transcript and briefs of the parties and conclude there was no abuse of discretion. The judgment is based upon substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16, V.A.M.R.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.                     

*Date:*                         November 25, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 900, Bethesda, MD 20892.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Ruixia Zhou, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Democracy Two Building, Suite 957, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-4773,                         *zhour@mail.nih.gov*.                     

Dated: October 9, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E8-24614 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21148]



[[Page 52378]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--United States Postal Service 
Inbound Market-Dominant Multi-Service Agreements With Foreign Postal 
Operators

AGENCY: Postal Service.<SUP>TM</SUP>

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add Inbound Market-Dominant Multi-
Service Agreements to the Market-Dominant Products List pursuant to 39 
U.S.C. 3642.

DATES: August 25, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret M. Falwell, 703-292-3576.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] gives 
notice of the filing of a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission 
to Add Market-Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal 
Administrations to the Market Dominant Product List, and Notice of 
Filing (Under Seal) the Enabling Governors' Decision. Documents are 
available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2010-35, R2010-5, and 
R2010-6.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-21148 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
---

Exhibit 32.2

U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kerry D. Hawkley, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Geothermal
  Inc. (the Company) certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for
        the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (report), which this
        certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                       

Date: February 20, 2007

/s/ Kerry D. Hawkley
  Kerry D. Hawkley 
  Chief Financial Officer

---
#### Clyde HOUSTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46189.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 3, 1973.

*95William Drew Perkins, Lufkin, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

JACKSON, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted by a jury on a plea of not guilty of the sale of a narcotic drug, to-wit, marihuana; the punishment, by the jury, ten (10) years.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

By his first ground of error appellant urges that the court erred in not granting his motion in limine to instruct the State’s attorney not to inform the jury panel that appellant had filed a motion for a probated sentence.

The jury was selected both to determine guilt or innocence and in the event of conviction, to decide upon appropriate punishment and upon the question of probation. The only chance either the State or the defense had to interrogate the prospective jurors on their prejudice or attitude towards probation was on voir dire. It was obviously proper to permit such examination. White v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 478 S.W.2d 506.

We overrule appellant’s first ground of error.

The second ground of error advanced by appellant is that the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial because a newspaper article, published after the selection of the jury and prior to the trial, was calculated to inform the jury of appellant’s previous trial and conviction.

The jury was selected on Tuesday and was excused until the following Monday, which was on October 26, 1971. On October 21, 1971, there appeared in the Lufkin News an article reciting that the second trial of appellant on dope charges was to be held the following week; that he had been previously tried and there was a mistrial because of a technicality. The article was on page 9 of the newspaper and was 3 by 2 inches in size. It did not say that appellant was convicted on the former trial. The motion for mistrial was heard on the day before the actual trial began. None of the jurors was asked if they read or heard of the article, either on the motion for mistrial or on motion for new trial after the verdict.

Therefore, the record does not reveal that the newspaper article in question ever found its way into the jury box or had any influence on any individual juror, or that appellant suffered any harm from it. Flores v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 146; Bowling v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 438 S.W.2d 930.

We overrule appellant’s second ground of error.

We find no reversible error and affirm the judgment.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael W. Zellner hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                  |  |  |  |                             
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | By: /s/ Michael W. Zellner  
|                  |  |  |  | Michael W. Zellner          
|                  |  |  |  | Vice President,             
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                  |  |  |  | Principal Accounting Officer
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 19, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.107 Rest of the World** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Pieter A Van der Vorst, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sybase, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: August 6, 2004
/s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORSTPieter A. Van der Vorst
Order entered October 2 4 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00142 - CV DARREN MELTON, Appellant

V. 601 JEALOUSE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cour t at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 06444 - B



### O RDER Before the Court is the October 23, 2019 request of Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 2, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s rec ord. We GRANT the request and extend the time to November 4, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE