# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-50722 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Mayra Vanessa Gandara Escarcega,
Defendant—Appellant ,

consolidated with

_____________
No. 20-50727

_____________ United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Mayra Vanessa Gandara-Escarcega,
Defendant—Appellant

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 25, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50722 Document: 00515756982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2021No. 20-50722 c/w No. 20-50727

2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-862-1 USDC No. 4:19-CR-800-1

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Mayra Vanessa Gandara Escarcega appeals the within-guidelines sentence of 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release imposed following her guilty plea convic tion for illegal reentry after removal from the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. She also appeals the concomitant revocations of her supervis ed release terms related to her prior convictions for attempted money launderi ng and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana and five kilograms or more of cocaine. Raising one issue on appeal, Gandara Escarcega argues that she is entitled to resentencing for her new illegal reentry convic tion because the sentencing enhancement provisions set forth under § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. She concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 229-35 (1998), and she seeks to preserve the issue for furt her review. The Government filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance agreeing that the issue is foreclosed and, in the alternative, a moti on for an extension of time to file a brief.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-50722 Document: 00515756982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2021No. 20-50722 c/w No. 20-50727

3 As the Government argues, and Ga ndara Escarcega agrees, the sole issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. PinedaArrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirm ance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Although the appeals of Gandar a Escarcega’s illegal reentry conviction and supervised release revo cations were consolidated, she does not address the revocations in her appellate brief. Consequently, she has abandoned any challenge she could ha ve raised to the revocations or revocation sentences. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the Government’s moti on for summary affirmance is GRANTED , and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED

. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. Case: 20-50722 Document: 00515756982 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/25/2021