UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-Q

---

[X]       QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
             SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2006

OR

[  ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________to _________

Commission file number 000-25249

Intraware, Inc.(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



|Delaware                                                       | 68-0389976                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

25 Orinda Way
Orinda, California      94563

(925) 253-4500

---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  YES    x NO     ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer      ̈ Accelerated filer     ̈ Non-accelerated filer    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES     ̈ NO    x Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.Class

Outstanding at September 30, 2006Common Stock, $0.001 par value

6,130,696
Note:PDF provided as a courtesy
Intraware, Inc.Table of Contents

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Page No.Item 1.   Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):Consolidated Balance Sheets — at August 31, 2006 and February 28, 2006

2Consolidated Statements of Operations — for the Three and Six Months Ended August 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005

3Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — for the Six Months Ended August 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005

4Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

5Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
                      Condition and Results of Operations

14Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

21Item 4.   Controls and Procedures

21PART II.  OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.   Legal Proceedings

21Item 1A.  Risk Factors

22Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

28Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities

28Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

28Item 5.   Other Information

28Item 6.   Exhibits

29Signatures

30Part I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INTRAWARE, INC. 
                     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                     (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                     (unaudited)

August 31, 2006

February 28, 2006ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents
$
12,542

$
12,650Accounts receivable, net

1,076


1,682Costs of deferred revenue

447


393Other current assets

386


329Total current assets

14,451


15,054Costs of deferred revenue, less current portion

465


244Property and equipment, net

604


620Other assets

184


146Total assets
$
15,704

$
16,064LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Notes payable
$
350

$
372Accounts payable

581


478Accrued expenses

947


804Deferred revenue

2,256


2,192Total current liabilities

4,134


3,846Deferred revenue, less current portion

236


136Notes payable, less current portion

78


158Total liabilities

4,448


4,140Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)Redeemable convertible preferred stock; $0.0001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized:Series A; 28 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2006 andFebruary 28, 2006, (aggregate liquidation preference of $500at August 31, 2006 and February 28, 2006).

449


449Series B; 1 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2006 and February 28, 2006,(aggregate liquidation preference of $6,000 and $6,300 atAugust 31, 2006 and February 28, 2006, respectively).

5,701


5,701Total redeemable convertible preferred stock

6,150


6,150Stockholders' equity:Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 250,000 shares authorized; 6,131 and 6,113 sharesissued and outstanding at August 31, 2006 and February 28, 2006, respectively.

1


1Additional paid-in-capital

164,427


163,756Accumulated deficit

(159,322)


(157,983)Total stockholders' equity

5,106


5,774Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity
$
15,704

$
16,064See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

2INTRAWARE, INC.
                     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                     (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                     (unaudited)

For the three months ended


For the six months endedAugust 31, 2006

August 31, 2005


August 31, 2006

August 31, 2005Revenues:Online services and technology
$
2,582

$
2,465


$
5,196

$
4,808Alliance and reimbursement

-


602



-


1,105Total revenues

2,582


3,067



5,196


5,913Cost of revenues:Online services and technology

1,084


1,055



2,148


2,177Alliance and reimbursement

-


417



-


818Total cost of revenues

1,084


1,472



2,148


2,995Gross profit

1,498


1,595



3,048


2,918Operating expenses:Sales and marketing

669


595



1,474


1,277Product development

502


335



981


585General and administrative

1,125


902



2,344


1,846Total operating expenses

2,296


1,832



4,799


3,708Loss from operations

(798)


(237)



(1,751)


(790)Interest expense

(10)


(16)



(21)


(35)Interest and other income and expenses, net

144


61



433


114Net loss
$
(664)

$
(192)


$
(1,339)

$
(711)Basic and diluted net loss per share
$
(0.11)

$
(0.03)


$
(0.22)

$
(0.12)Weighted average shares - basic and diluted

6,129


6,058



6,124


6,055See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

3INTRAWARE, INC.
                     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                     (in thousands)
                     (unaudited)

For the six months ended

August 31, 2006

August 31, 2005Cash flows from operating activities:Net loss
$
(1,339)

$
(711)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Depreciation and amortization

215


299Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts

30


(5)Stock-based compensation

562


-Amortization of discount on note payable

-


3Changes in assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable

576


840Costs of deferred revenue

(222)


(12)Other assets

(95)


(22)Accounts payable

76


108Accrued liabilities

142


(73)Deferred revenue

165


(322)Net cash provided by operating activities

110


105Cash flows from investing activities:Purchases of property and equipment

(172)


(190)Net cash used in investing activities

(172)


(190)Cash flows from financing activities:Proceeds from notes payable

137


176Principal payments on notes payable

(240)


(587)Proceeds from common stock

57


64Net cash used in financing activities

(46)


(347)Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(108)


(432)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

12,650


9,463Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
12,542

$
9,031Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Cash paid for interest
$
21

$
32Supplemental non-cash activity:Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable
$
53

$
3See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

4INTRAWARE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
INTRAWARE
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have
been condensed or omitted under these rules and regulations.  However, management believes the disclosures are adequate to
ensure the information presented is not misleading.  The balance sheet at February 28, 2006 has been derived from the audited
financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.  These unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006 filed with the SEC on April 21,
2006.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items considered necessary for a fair statement,
have been included in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.  The results of operations for the
interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of operating results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the
fiscal year ending February 28, 2007.
We have incurred losses and negative cash flow from operations during each fiscal year since inception. Net loss for the three and
six months ended August 31, 2006, increased from our prior year loss for the corresponding period. For the six months ended August
31, 2006, we recorded cash provided from operating activities of $0.1 million, which was consistent with the corresponding period in the
prior year. Our cash balances may decline further, although we believe that the effects of our capital financing, strategic actions
implemented to improve revenue, and cost controls will be adequate to generate sufficient cash resources to fund our future
operations.  If we fail to generate sufficient revenues or adequately control spending, we may be unable to achieve key business
objectives.

NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are met:

There is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
We have provided the service to the customer, made the software available for customer download through
our website, or shipped the software to the customer;





Our online services and technology revenue results primarily from three types of arrangements. First, it results
from sales of our SubscribeNet digital delivery service to software vendors and other companies that distribute software as part of their
business. Second, it results from professional services that we provide to customize our SubscribeNet service for customers, to convert
data for customers, and to integrate our proprietary software. Third, it results from our resale of third-party services or licenses
complementary to our SubscribeNet service, one of which is e-commerce. In addition, if appropriate opportunities present themselves in
the future, we may generate online services and technology revenue from the sale of licenses to our proprietary software, and related
maintenance, to companies using those products internally or using those products to provide web-based services to their customers.

Alliance and reimbursement revenue primarily relates to our former alliance agreement with Software Spectrum
for sales and marketing services. This revenue consisted of a percentage of the gross profit derived from Software Spectrum's sales of
the third-party software and maintenance for which we provided sales and marketing services, and, prior to August 1, 2005,
reimbursement for the costs of maintaining a sales team dedicated to providing sales and marketing services to Software Spectrum for
that third-party software and maintenance. This revenue was recognized as we provided the services to Software Spectrum. On August
1, 2005, we signed an updated agreement with Software Spectrum. Under the updated agreement, Software Spectrum paid us a higher
percentage of the gross profit derived from its sales of Sun software licenses and maintenance. However, Software Spectrum stopped
reimbursing us for our direct costs in maintaining a team dedicated to sales of Sun software licenses and maintenance. We terminated
our alliance agreement with Software

5



---





Spectrum effective January 3, 2006, in connection with the sale of our Sun One customer list to
FusionStorm. That sale was completed on January 3, 2006. We ceased recognizing alliance and reimbursement revenue on that date.

We defer online services and technology revenues related to our SubscribeNet digital delivery service and
generally recognize them ratably over the term of the service arrangement. The typical subscription term is one year, although some
may be shorter or extend up to approximately 3 years. Our customer contracts are generally noncancelable, though customers usually
have the right to terminate their contracts for cause if we materially fail to perform. A majority of our SubscribeNet service
implementations for new customers involve customization essential to the functionality of the service. In these cases, we defer revenue
recognition until the service go-live date is reached, and then recognize the revenue on a ratable basis over the remaining contract
term. The go-live date is the later of the date on which the essential functionality is delivered or the point at which no additional
customization is required. Our SubscribeNet contracts with customers normally give the customer a period of time (generally five days)
to evaluate a SubscribeNet implementation after we have completed it, and provide that the customer is deemed to have accepted the
implementation if it has not affirmatively rejected it within that period. We typically rely on such non-rejections by customers to indicate
their acceptance of implementations.

We also sell additional professional services related to SubscribeNet agreements. Generally, these services do
not provide stand-alone value to a customer and, accordingly, we defer recognition of this revenue until the go-live date for the
professional services, similar to the manner in which we treat SubscribeNet service revenues discussed above. Such professional
services revenues are recognized ratably over the longer of the remaining estimated customer life or the remaining contract term,
commencing with the completion of the professional services. Estimated customer life requires that we periodically estimate the
projected life of our existing customers based on historical information such as customer renewal rates. In some instances the
implementation of the SubscribeNet service and professional services are bundled into the initial agreement without specifically stating
the fees for each one. In these instances the professional services fees are recognized from acceptance to the end of the remaining
contract term on a ratable basis with the SubscribeNet fee.

Online services and technology revenues related to our resale of third-party services or software licenses complementary to our
SubscribeNet service are generally recognized as the service is provided. If the service or license resold involves customization
essential to the functionality of the underlying SubscribeNet service, the fees charged for the customization are recognized as revenue
in the same manner as professional services discussed above. Resold services or licenses are recognized as revenue based on the
gross fee charged to the customer, since we bear the credit risk for resold services or licenses, have latitude in establishing pricing, and
are primarily responsible for acceptability of the services or licenses delivered. In addition, costs paid to the third-party providers are
recorded as cost of revenues and recognized in the same manner as the related revenue.

Deferred Costs

We capitalize direct costs of revenues related to significant SubscribeNet service implementations and established
professional services contracts associated with our SubscribeNet services. Direct costs include compensation and payroll-related fringe
benefits directly related to the time spent on significant implementation and professional services activities. These costs are recognized
the same period as the related revenue is recognized (see Revenue Recognition above). Costs associated with professional services
involving significant new functionality for the SubscribeNet service that are partially or fully funded by customers, but which do not
qualify as funded research and development activities, are expensed as cost of revenues as incurred until a working model is delivered
to the customer. Once a working model has been delivered, all additional direct costs are capitalized in the same manner discussed
above. Any change in our revenue recognition estimates could result in corresponding changes to our recognition of costs of deferred
revenues. A 10% increase in our estimated customer life during the three and six months ended August 31, 2006 would have caused a
net increase in our net loss of approximately $6,000 and $12,000 respectively. At August 31, 2006, we had approximately $0.9 million
in capitalized costs relating to deferred revenues. We expense customer acquisition costs, including sales commissions, as incurred.
We also defer legal costs incurred in connection with patent applications. As of August 31, 2006 we had $0.2 million in deferred legal
costs. Upon issuance of a patent, the deferred legal costs for that patent are expensed ratably over the patent's useful life.

Stock-Based Compensation

In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a Statement, "Share-Based Payment, an
amendment of FASB Statements Nos. 123 and 95" ("SFAS 123 (R)"), that addresses the accounting for share-based payment
transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of the company or liabilities that
are based on the fair value of the company's equity instruments, or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. The
statement eliminates the practice of accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method, and
generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method and recognized as expense in the
consolidated statements of income. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 ("SAB 107")
regarding the Staff's interpretation of SFAS 123 (R). This interpretation provides the Staff's views regarding interactions between SFAS
123 (R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public
companies. The interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of SFAS 123 (R) and investors and
users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided.

Following the guidance prescribed in SAB 107, on March 1, 2006 we adopted SFAS 123 (R) using the modified prospective method
and accordingly, have not restated the consolidated results of income from prior interim periods and fiscal years. Under SFAS 123 (R),
we are required to measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on date of grant and recognize compensation
expense on a straight-line basis over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. Stock options issued under our equity
plans, as well as stock

6



---





purchases under our employee stock purchase plan, are subject to SFAS 123 (R). Stock options generally vest
over a three to four-year service period. Since our adoption of SFAS 123 (R), there have been no material changes to our equity plans
or modifications to outstanding stock-based awards.

Prior to March 1, 2006, Intraware accounted for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"), as
permitted by "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), and "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition
and Disclosure" ("SFAS 148). Under the intrinsic value method, the difference between the market price on the date of grant and the
exercise price is charged to the results of operations over the vesting period on a straight-line method. For the three and six months
ended August 31, 2005, had we accounted for all employee stock-based compensation based on the estimated grant date fair
values, as defined by SFAS 123, our net loss and net loss per share would have been adjusted to the following pro forma amounts (in
thousands, except per share data):

|                                                                    |   |       | For the three months ended |   |       | For the six months ended
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----- | -------------------------- | - | ----- | ------------------------
|                                                                    |   |       | August 31, 2005            |   |       | August 31, 2005         
|Net loss                                                            | $ | (192) |                            | $ | (711)
|Deduct:  Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined |   |       |                            |   |      
|under fair value based method for all awards                        |   |       | (608)                      |   |       | (1,196)                 
|Pro forma                                                           |   | $     | (800)                      |   | $     | (1,907)                 
|                                                                    |   |       |                            |   |       |                         
|Net loss per share -- basic and diluted                             |   |       |                            |   |      
|As reported                                                         |   | $     | (0.03)                     |   | $     | (0.12)                  
|                                                                    |   |       |                            |   |       |                         
|Pro forma                                                           |   | $     | (0.13)                     |   | $     | (0.31)                  

In the pro forma disclosures prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for forfeitures upon occurrence
whereas we now estimate a forfeiture rate for those awards not expected to vest, and adjust the actual forfeitures periodically as
incurred.

Upon adoption of SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we recognized the compensation expense associated with awards
granted on or after March 1, 2006, and the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding as of
March 1, 2006, in our unaudited consolidated statement of operations.

The effect of recording stock-based compensation for the three and six months ended August 31, 2006 was as follows:

|                                                  |  |   | Three Months    |  |   | Six Months     
|------------------------------------------------- |  | - | --------------- |  | - | ---------------
|                                                  |  |   | Ended           |  |   | Ended          
|                                                  |  |   | August 31, 2006 |  |   | August 31, 2006
|Stock-based compensation expense by type of award |  |   |                 |  |   |                
|Employee stock options                            |  | $ | 275             |  | $ | 562            
|Net effect on net loss                            |  | $ | 275             |  | $ | 562            
|                                                  |  |   |                 |  |   |                
|Effect on loss per share: - basic and diluted     |  | $ | (0.04)          |  | $ | (0.09)         

Consistent with our valuation method for the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123, we are using the Black-Scholes model to
value the compensation expense associated with our stock-based awards under SFAS 123(R). In addition, we estimate forfeitures
when recognizing compensation expense, and we will adjust our estimate of forfeitures over the requisite service period based on the
extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be
recognized through a catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also impact the amount of compensation expense to be
recognized in future periods.

The following weighted average assumptions were used in the estimated grant date fair value calculations for stock option awards:

|                                 |  | Three Months Ended |   |  |  | Six Months Ended |  
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | - |  |  | ---------------- | -
|                                 |  | August 31,         |   |  |  | August 31,       |  
|                                 |  | 2006               |   |  |  | 2005             |  
|                                 |  |                    |   |  |  |                  |  
|Dividend yield                   |  | 0                  | % |  |  | 0                | %
|Expected stock price volatility  |  | 74                 | % |  |  | 67 - 86          | %
|Risk-free interest rate          |  | 4.84 - 5.07        | % |  |  | 3.69 - 4.17      | %
|Average expected life (in years) |  | 3.57               |   |  |  | 3 - 4            |  

7



---





The expected stock price volatility rates are based on historical volatilities of our common stock.
The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for
periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. The average expected life represents the
weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, giving consideration
to vesting schedules and our historical exercise patterns. For the quarter ended August 31, 2006, the
average expected life was determined using the historical approach, and for option types where we have
limited historical data we used the simplified method, described under SAB 107.

Net loss per share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period, excluding shares subject to repurchase. The terms of our redeemable convertible
preferred stock include the right to participate in dividends declared to common stockholders. Our redeemable convertible preferred
stock does not have a contractual obligation to share in the losses in any given period. As a result, this participating security will not be
allocated any losses in the periods of net losses, but will be allocated income in the periods of net income using the two-class method.
The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and
participating securities according to dividends declared or accumulated and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under the
two-class method, net income is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the current period for each class of stock and by the
contractual amounts of dividends that must be paid for the current period. The remaining earnings are then allocated to common stock
and participating securities to the extent that each security may share in earnings, as if all of the earnings for the period had been
distributed. The total earnings allocated to each security are determined by adding together the amounts allocated for dividends and the
amounts allocated for a participation feature. The total earnings allocated to each security are then divided by the number of
outstanding shares of the security to which the earnings are allocated to determine the earnings per share.

Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common and
potential common shares outstanding during the period if the effect is dilutive. Potential common shares are composed of common
stock subject to repurchase rights and incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants
and upon the conversion of preferred stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants is computed using the
treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share, as well as securities not included in the
diluted net loss per share calculation because doing so would be antidilutive (in thousands, except per share amounts):

|                                        |   |        | For the three months ended |   |        | For the six months ended
|--------------------------------------- | - | ------ | -------------------------- | - | ------ | ------------------------
|                                        |   |        | August 31, 2006            |   |        | August 31, 2005         
|                                        |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Numerator:                              |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Net loss                                |   | $      | (664)                      |   | $      | (192)                   
|                                        |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Denominator:                            |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Weighted average shares                 |   |        | 6,129                      |   |        | 6,058                   
|                                        |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Basic and diluted net loss per share    | $ | (0.11) |                            | $ | (0.03) |                         
|                                        |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Antidilutive securities not included in |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|weighted average shares:                |   |        |                            |   |        |                         
|Redeemable convertible preferred stock  |   |        | 1,028                      |   |        | 55                      
|Warrants to purchase common stock       |   |        | 159                        |   |        | 159                     
|Employee stock options                  |   |        | 1,366                      |   |        | 1,221                   
|                                        |   |        | 2,553                      |   |        | 1,435                   

Web Site Development Costs

Intraware accounts for web site development costs in accordance with the provisions of "Accounting for Web Site
Development Costs" Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No.00-2 or EITF 00-2, which requires that certain costs to develop web sites
be capitalized or expensed, depending on the nature of the costs. We amortize web site development costs using the straight-line
method over an estimated useful life of two years. The total capitalized web site development costs for the six months ended August
31, 2006 was approximately $10,500.

8



---





NOTE 3. CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

During the six months ended August 31, 2006 our stockholders' equity changed as follows (in thousands):

|                                                             | Common stock |  |   | Additional
 paid-in |  |   | Accumulated |  |   | Stockholders' |  |   | Comprehensive
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------ |  | - | ------------------- |  | - | ----------- |  | - | ------------- |  | - | -------------
|                                                             | Shares       |  |   | Amount              |  |   | capital     |  |   | deficit       |  |   | equity       
|                                                             |              |  |   |                     |  |   |             |  |   |               |  |   |              
|Balance at February 28, 2006                                 | 6,113        |  | $ | 1                   |  | $ | 163,756     |  | $ | (157,983)     |  | $ | 5,774        
|Exercise of stock options                                    | 7            |  |   | -                   |  |   | 17          |  |   | -             |  |   | 17           
|Issuance of common stock for employee stock purchase program | 11           |  |   | -                   |  |   | 41          |  |   | -             |  |   | 41           
|Stock Based Compensation                                     |              |  |   |                     |  |   | 613         |  |   |               |  |   | 613          
|Net loss                                                     | -            |  |   | -                   |  |   | -           |  |   | (1,339)       |  |   | (1,339)      
|Other comprehensive loss                                     |              |  |   |                     |  |   |             |  |   |               |  |   |              
|Comprehensive loss                                           |              |  |   |                     |  |   |             |  |   |               |  |   |              
|                                                             |              |  |   |                     |  |   |             |  |   |               |  |   |              
|Balance at August 31, 2006                                   | 6,131        |  | $ | 1                   |  | $ | 164,427     |  | $ | (159,322)     |  | $ | 5,106        

NOTE 4. CONTINGENCIES

Indemnifications

In the course of our business, we have given indemnities and made commitments and guarantees under which we may be
required to make payments. These indemnities include:

- Intellectual Property Indemnities to Customers and Resellers. Our customer and reseller agreements for our SubscribeNet
service typically contain provisions that indemnify our customers or resellers for damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that
our services infringe the intellectual property rights of a third-party. We have also entered into software license agreements
indemnifying the licensees for damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that the software infringes third-party intellectual
property rights. The duration of these indemnities is typically unlimited. Our potential payments under these indemnities are in some
cases limited (e.g., to the fees paid to us under the contract or to another amount) and are in other cases unlimited. Where we have
given such indemnities for third-party software licenses that we resold, we have typically received similar indemnities from the software
publishers. We plan to continue to enter into SubscribeNet service agreements with customers and resellers, to continue to license
software, and to continue to provide industry-standard indemnities to our service customers, resellers and licensees.
- Intellectual Property Indemnity to Acquiror of Asset Management Business. In the May 2002 sale of our Asset
Management software business to Computer Associates International, Inc., we agreed to indemnify Computer Associates for damages
and costs incurred by it in connection with claims alleging that the software and technology we sold to them infringes the intellectual
property rights of third parties. This indemnity will remain in effect until May 2007. Our maximum potential payment under this indemnity
is $9.5 million.
- Indemnities to Private Investors. In our private placements of stock, we have made representations and warranties to the
investors and placement agents, and have agreed to indemnify them for any damages and costs they incur as a result of our breach of
those representations and warranties. We also have signed investor and/or registration rights agreements with private investors under
which we indemnify them for damages they incur as a result of any material misstatements or omissions in our registration statements,
and pay penalties in the event we fail to maintain the effectiveness of registration statements. The duration of our indemnities to our
investors under the respective stock and warrant purchase agreements ranges from one to two years from the respective closing dates,
other than the purchase agreements for our June 2000 warrants, our January 2001 Series A Preferred Stock, and our November 2005
Series B Preferred Stock, which provide for indemnities of unlimited duration. In general, our indemnities to our investors under the
respective registration rights agreements expire upon termination of our registration obligations, which is typically the date the securities
may be sold under Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933. With respect to our Investor Rights Agreement with Digital River, Inc.
for Series B Preferred Stock, however, our indemnification obligations survive any offering of Registrable Securities, as defined in the
agreement, or the termination of the agreement. Our potential payments under these indemnities are unlimited.
- Indemnities to Directors and Officers. We indemnify our directors and officers for damages and costs incurred in the
performance of their duties, to the extent permitted by Delaware law. The duration of, and our potential payments under, these
indemnities are unlimited, subject to Delaware law.

9



---





We historically have received only a very limited number of requests for indemnification under these agreements and have not
been required to make material payments under them. Accordingly, we believe that the fair value of each of these indemnification
agreements is minimal and therefore have not recorded a liability related to these indemnification provisions.

Legal Proceedings

In re Intraware, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

In October 2001, we were served with a summons and complaint in a purported securities class action lawsuit. On or about
April 19, 2002, we were served with an amended complaint in this action, which is now titled In re Intraware, Inc. Initial Public
Offering Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 01-9349 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation,
21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.). The amended complaint is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock
from February 25, 1999 (the date of our initial public offering) through December 6, 2000. It names as defendants Intraware, three of
our present and former officers and directors, and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of our initial public
offering. The complaint alleges liability under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the registration statement for the offerings did not disclose that: (1) the
underwriters had agreed to allow certain customers to purchase shares in the offerings in exchange for excess commissions paid to the
underwriters; and (2) the underwriters had arranged for certain customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at
predetermined prices. The amended complaint also alleges that the underwriters misused their securities analysts to manipulate the
price of our stock. No specific damages are claimed.

Lawsuits containing similar allegations have been filed in the Southern District of New York challenging over 300 other initial public
offerings and secondary offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. All of these lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial purposes
before United States District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin of the Southern District of New York. On July 15, 2002, an omnibus motion
to dismiss was filed in the coordinated litigation on behalf of the issuer defendants, of which Intraware and its three named current and
former officers and directors are a part, on common pleadings issues. On or about October 9, 2002, the Court entered and ordered a
Stipulation of Dismissal, which dismissed the three named current and former officers and directors from the litigation without prejudice.
On February 19, 2003, the Court entered an order denying in part the issuer-defendants' omnibus motion to dismiss, including those
portions of the motion to dismiss relating to Intraware.

In June 2004, a stipulation of settlement for the claims against the issuer-defendants, including us, was submitted to the Court. The
underwriter-defendants in the In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation (collectively, the "underwriter-defendants"),
including the underwriters of our initial public offering, are not parties to the stipulation of settlement.

The settlement provides that, in exchange for a release of claims against the settling issuer-defendants, the insurers of all of the
settling issuer-defendants will provide a surety undertaking to guarantee plaintiffs a $1 billion recovery from the non-settling defendants,
including the underwriter-defendants. The amount our insurers would be required to pay to the plaintiffs could range from zero to
approximately $3.5 million, depending on plaintiffs' recovery from the underwriter-defendants and from other non-settling parties. If the
plaintiffs recover at least $1 billion from the underwriter-defendants, our insurers would have no liability for settlement payments under
the terms of the settlement. If the plaintiffs recover less than $1 billion, we believe our insurance will likely cover our share of any
payments towards satisfying plaintiffs' $1 billion recovery deficit. Management estimates that its range of loss relative to this matter is
zero to $3.5 million. Presently there is no more likely point estimate of loss within this range. As a consequence of the uncertainties
described above regarding the amount we will ultimately be required to pay, if any, as of August 31, 2006, we have not accrued a
liability for this matter.

On August 31, 2005, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A fairness hearing for the settlement took place in
April 2006. After the hearing, the court took the matter under submission and has not yet issued a final ruling.

NOTE 5.  NOTES PAYABLE

In August 2003, we issued a note payable to Silicon Valley Bank for proceeds of approximately $2.0 million. The note was
payable in fixed monthly principal installments plus interest through September 2005. In connection with the note payable, we issued a
warrant to purchase 4,173 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $11.90 per share. The warrant was immediately
exercisable and expires in August 2010. We estimated the allocated fair value of such warrant at approximately $46,000 using the
Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 136%, risk-free interest rate of 4.01%, expected life
of seven years and no dividends. The value of the warrant was recorded as a debt discount and was amortized as interest expense
using the effective interest method over the life of the note payable. The debt discount related to the warrant was fully amortized as of
August 31, 2006. As of August 31, 2006, the warrant had not been exercised.

In August 2003, we entered into an equipment advance agreement with Silicon Valley Bank. The equipment advance bears
annual interest at the greater of 5.50% or 1.00% above the bank's prime rate.  The agreement provided for borrowings of up to
$500,000 through August 2004 and was limited to equipment purchases.  We borrowed approximately $363,000 under this
agreement and paid fixed monthly principal installments plus interest through August 2006. The advance was paid in full as of
August 31, 2006.

10



---





In September 2004, we entered into a second equipment advance agreement with Silicon Valley Bank.  The
equipment advance bears annual interest at the greater of 5.50% or 1.00% above the bank's prime rate.  This equipment
advance allowed us to borrow up to $500,000 through August 1, 2005, solely to finance equipment purchases.  As
of August 31, 2006, we had borrowed approximately $493,000 under this agreement, and the interest rate at that date was
9.25%.  Monthly payments of interest only were payable through August 2005, after which fixed monthly principal
installments plus interest will be made through August 2007.

In November 2005, we entered into a third equipment advance agreement with Silicon Valley Bank.  This new
equipment advance bears annual interest at the greater of 7.0% or 1.00% above the bank's prime rate.  This third equipment
advance allows us to borrow up to $500,000 through November 30, 2006, solely to finance equipment purchases.  As of
August 31, 2006, we had borrowed approximately $207,000 under this agreement and the interest rate at that date was
9.25%.  Each advance is repayable over 24 monthly installments of principal plus interest, beginning the month after the
advance is made.

All of this debt is collateralized by a senior security interest in substantially all of our assets.  We are also required to maintain
compliance with certain financial covenants, all of which we were in compliance with at August 31, 2006.

Scheduled maturities of debt at August 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

|Years ending:     |   |    
|----------------- | - | ---
|February 28, 2007 | $ | 175
|February 29, 2008 |   | 227
|February 29, 2009 |   | 26 
|                  | $ | 428

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three and six months ended August 31, 2006, we provided e-commerce solutions to our customers by using
managed e-commerce services that were provided by a wholly owned subsidiary of Digital River, Inc. ("Digital River"). Digital River
owns approximately 14% of Intraware under a Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.

NOTE 7. COMMON STOCK

Reverse Stock Split

At the close of business on September 26, 2005, we effected a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our common stock.  All
share and per share information included in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements has been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.  Shares authorized and par value were not adjusted because they were not affected by
the reverse stock split.

Stock Option Plans

1996 Stock Option Plan

In October 1996, we adopted our 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Plan"), which became effective in November 1996.
The 1996 Plan provides for the granting of stock options to our employees and consultants. Options granted under the 1996 Plan may
be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. Incentive stock options (that is, options intended to qualify as incentive
stock options under the Internal Revenue Code, or "ISOs") may be granted only to our employees (including directors who are also
employees). Nonstatutory stock options (that is, options not intended to qualify as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue
Code, or "NSOs") may be granted to our employees and consultants. At February 28, 2006, we had reserved approximately
0.4 million shares of common stock for issuance under the 1996 Plan. The shares reserved are subject to annual increases equal
to the lesser of (a) 300,000 shares, (b) 6% of the outstanding shares on such date, or (c) a lesser amount
determined by the Board.

The 1996 Plan provides that the options shall be exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years from the date of the grant.
However, in the case of an ISO granted to a person owning more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock,
the term of the option will be five years from the date of the grant. The initial grant by us to an employee under this plan generally vests
as to 25% of the shares one year after the date of the grant, and as to the remaining shares in equal monthly installments over the
following 36 months. Subsequent grants by us to that employee under this plan generally vest in one of two ways; first, 12.5% of
the shares vest 6 months after the date of the grant, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments over the
following 42 months; second, 16.7% of the shares vest 6 months after the date of the grant, and the remaining shares vest
in equal monthly installments over the following 30 months

Under the 1996 Plan, the exercise price of an option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date
of grant as determined by the Board of Directors. However, the exercise price of an ISO or NSO granted to a 10% shareholder may not
be less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The 1996 Plan expires on October 28, 2006.

11



---





1998 Director Option Plan

In December 1998, we adopted the 1998 Director Option Plan (the "Director Plan"), which became effective in
February 1999. The Director Plan provides for the granting of stock options to Board members who are not employees of
Intraware. We have reserved approximately 17,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the Director Plan at February 28, 2006.
The option grants under the Director Plan are automatic and nondiscretionary, and the exercise price of the options must be 100% of
the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. We determine fair market value by the closing price of the common
stock on Nasdaq on the grant date. Each eligible Board member is granted an option to purchase 1,500 shares ("First Option") on the
date such person first becomes a director. Immediately following each annual meeting of stockholders, each eligible Board member is
automatically granted an additional option to purchase 750 shares ("Subsequent Option") if such director has served continuously as a
member of the Board for at least the preceding six months. The Director Plan provides that the options shall be exercisable over a
period not to exceed ten years from the date of the grant; however, the options terminate 3 months following the date the director
ceases to be a member of the Board (12 months if the director ceased to be a Board member because of death or disability).
First Options vest as to 12.5% of the shares 6 months after the grant date and as to remaining shares in equal installments over
the next 42 months provided the optionee continues as a member of the Board. Subsequent Options vest as to 25% of the
shares 6 months after the grant date and as to the remaining shares in equal installments over the next 18 months.

The 1998 Director Plan expires in December 2008.

1999 Non-Qualified Acquisition Stock Option Plan

In October 1999, we adopted the Non-Qualified Acquisition Stock Option Plan (the "1999 Plan"). The 1999 Plan provides
for the granting of NSOs to our employees and consultants. Officers may only receive grants under the 1999 Plan in connection with
their initial service to us, and Board members may not receive any grants under the 1999 Plan. We reserved 350,000 shares of
common stock for issuance under the 1999 Plan at the time of its adoption. The standard form of Stock Option Agreement used under
the 1999 Plan provides that the options are exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years from the date of the grant. Options
granted under the 1999 Plan generally vest as to 25% of the shares one year after the date of grant and as to the remaining options in
equal monthly installments over the next 36 months. The exercise price of all options granted under the 1999 Plan has been the
fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, as determined by the closing price of the common stock on Nasdaq on that
date. During the year ended February 29, 2004, we ceased issuing options from this plan. All remaining options available for grant were
removed from the plan at that time, and we do not intend to grant options from this plan in the future.

The 1999 Plan expires in October 2009.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In December 1998, the Board adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"), which became
effective February 1999. The Purchase Plan reserves 60,000 shares of common stock for issuance there under. On each
March 1 beginning in 2000, the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan is increased
automatically by the lesser of 40,000 shares, 1% of the outstanding shares on such date, or a lesser amount determined by the Board
of Directors. Employees generally are eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan if they are customarily employed by us for more than
20 hours per week and more than five months in a calendar year and are not (and would not become as a result of being granted
an option under the Purchase Plan) 5% stockholders. Under the Purchase Plan, eligible employees select a rate of payroll deduction up
to 15% of their W-2 cash compensation, subject to certain maximum purchase limitations. Each offering period has a maximum
duration of two years and consists of four six-month purchase periods. Depending on the effective date, the first purchase period is
approximately six months long. Offering Periods and purchase periods thereafter begin on May 1 and November 1. The
price at which the common stock is purchased under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of our common
stock on the first day of the applicable offering period or on the last day of that purchase period. The Purchase Plan expires in
2008.

Stock Options

As of August 31, 2006, we had an aggregate of 0.5 million shares available for grant under our equity plans. The equity
plans provide for the issuance of common shares pursuant to stock option exercises and other equity-based awards. Under the equity
plans, stock options can be issued to employees and to non-employee directors. Stock options are generally granted under the equity
plans with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.

12



---





The following table presents a summary of Intraware's stock option activity for the six months ended August 31, 2006:

|                                 |  |  |           |  |   |          |  |  | Weighted    |  |   |          
|-------------------------------- |  |  | --------- |  | - | -------- |  |  | ----------- |  | - | ---------
|                                 |  |  |           |  |   |          |  |  | Average     |  |   |          
|                                 |  |  |           |  |   | Weighted |  |  | Remaining   |  |   | Aggregate
|                                 |  |  |           |  |   | Average  |  |  | Contractual |  |   | Intrinsic
|                                 |  |  |           |  |   | Exercise |  |  | Term        |  |   | Value    
|                                 |  |  | Shares    |  |   | Price    |  |  | (Years)     |  |   | ($000's) 
|Outstanding at February 28, 2006 |  |  | 1,119,649 |  | $ | 16.36    |  |  | 6.57        |  | $ | 527      
|Granted                          |  |  | 129,300   |  |   | 6.42     |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Exercised                        |  |  | (3,344)   |  |   | 3.34     |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Forfeited                        |  |  | (88,081)  |  |   | 31.08    |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Outstanding at May 31, 2006      |  |  | 1,157,524 |  |   | 14.16    |  |  | 6.73        |  |   | 509      
|Granted                          |  |  | 242,800   |  |   | 3.74     |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Exercised                        |  |  | (3,250)   |  |   | 1.76     |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Forfeited                        |  |  | (31,314)  |  |   | 29.26    |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Outstanding at August 31, 2006   |  |  | 1,365,760 |  | $ | 11.99    |  |  | 6.62        |  | $ | 34       
|                                 |  |  |           |  |   |          |  |  |             |  |   |          
|                                 |  |  |           |  |   |          |  |  |             |  |   |          
|Exercisable at August 31, 2006   |  |  | 737,377   |  | $ | 16.91    |  |  | 6.05        |  | $ | 12       

The aggregate intrinsic value is the sum of the amounts by which the quoted market price of our stock exceeded the exercise price
of the options at August 31, 2006, for those options for which the quoted market price was in excess of the exercise price
("in-the-money options"). The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarter ended August 31, 2006 was
approximately $9,000. The total cash received from employees as a result of stock option exercises for the three and six months ended
August 31, 2006 was approximately $6,000 and $17,000, respectively. The company did not realize any tax benefits in connection with
these exercises due to the fact that a full valuation allowance relating to the deferred tax assets has been recorded.

The following table summarizes the information about all stock options outstanding and exercisable as of August 31, 2006 (in
thousands, except per share amounts and years):

|                         |         |             |  | Options Outstanding at August 31, 2006 |  | Options Vested and Exercisable at August 31, 2006
|------------------------ | ------- | ----------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                         |         |             |  |                                        |  | Weighted                                         
|                         |         |             |  |                                        |  | Average                                          
|                         |         |             |  |                                        |  | Remaining                                        
|                         |         |             |  | Number                                 |  | Contractual                                      
|Range of Exercise Prices |         | Outstanding |  | Life                                   |  |                                                  
|$                        | 1.25 -  | 3.20        |  | 5                                      |  | 7.06                                             
|                         | 3.30 -  | 3.30        |  | 145                                    |  | 3.91                                             
|                         | 3.50 -  | 3.60        |  | 4                                      |  | 8.91                                             
|                         | 3.67 -  | 3.67        |  | 235                                    |  | 4.94                                             
|                         | 3.70 -  | 6.35        |  | 186                                    |  | 8.04                                             
|                         | 6.47 -  | 7.70        |  | 163                                    |  | 6.58                                             
|                         | 7.85 -  | 9.50        |  | 138                                    |  | 6.43                                             
|                         | 10.00-  | 13.49       |  | 134                                    |  | 6.67                                             
|                         | 14.10 - | 14.10       |  | 160                                    |  | 7.93                                             
|                         | 15.00 - | 727.50      |  | 196                                    |  | 5.77                                             
|                         |         |             |  | 1,366                                  |  | 6.26                                             

NOTE 8. PREFERRED STOCK

We are authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by Delaware law, to provide for the issuance of preferred stock in one or
more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares included within each series, to fix the rights, preferences and privileges
of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon, and to increase or decrease the
number of shares of any such series (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding) without any further vote or
action by the stockholders.

During the six months ended August 31, 2006 there was no activity in our redeemable convertible preferred stock.

13



---





NOTE 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On September 11, 2006 the Company's Board of Directors appointed Robert F. Kleiber to serve as a Company Board
member, effective immediately. Mr. Kleiber currently serves as Vice President of Investor Relations at Digital River, Inc. ("Digital River").
The Board appointed Mr. Kleiber in accordance with the Company's November 9, 2005 Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement
with Digital River. Under that agreement, and upon the Company's entering into a strategic alliance agreement with Digital River on
June 22, 2006, Digital River became entitled to have the Company's Board of Directors appoint or nominate, as applicable, a
representative to a seat on the Company's Board. Digital River will continue to have these rights so long as it owns ten percent or more
of the Company's outstanding common stock (on an as-converted to common stock basis).

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
2006, which was filed with the SEC on April 21, 2006, and the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Forward-looking statements include statements regarding trends in the marketplace, our future cash and liquidity position, the extent
and timing of future revenues and expenses and customer demand, the deployment of our products and services or the anticipated
performance of products or services, statements regarding the financial statement impact of SFAS 123(R), statements regarding future
economic conditions or performance, and statements regarding our anticipated interactions with third parties.  All forward-looking
statements included in this document are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to
update any forward-looking statement except as required by law.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated
in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including without limitation those discussed in "Risk Factors" below
and elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Intraware Overview

Our goal is to become the de facto standard among digital delivery solution providers. We continue to pursue various strategy
objectives to achieve this goal. First, we are working to become a profitable, cash-generating company by growing our SubscribeNet
business and practicing stringent fiscal responsibility. Second, we are seeking to strengthen our technological advantage by further
improving our electronic software and licensing management solutions internally and with partners. Third, we are increasing our efforts
to reach additional markets outside our existing enterprise software developer customer base. Fourth, we seek to continue extending
and strengthening our customer base by executing on our sales and marketing plan, and by providing exceptional customer service.

We currently see a number of trends in the marketplace that are potentially important for our business. First, growth in the
technology sector has improved over the past two years. We have benefited from this trend as technology companies experiencing
growth have been more willing to invest in technologies that support their own businesses. However, with this growth have come
inflationary pressures on our personnel costs, which is the most significant component of our cost structure. Second, the pace of
mergers and acquisitions in the enterprise software sector remains brisk. These consolidations pose both opportunities and risks for us,
potentially leading either to growth in our contracts with those customers if they grow larger, or to cancellation of customer contracts if
our customers merge or are acquired by companies that do not use our electronic software and licensing management service. Third,
technology companies continue the trend of outsourcing operational functions to reduce costs. Our services enable enterprise software
companies to outsource key operational functions in a manner we believe is financially compelling. Therefore, we may benefit from this
outsourcing trend. Fourth, the use of hosted web-based applications, which in the past has been limited by concerns about speed,
reliability and security, continues to gain acceptance among mainstream businesses, largely because of a desire for cost savings. This
trend may benefit us because our SubscribeNet service is a hosted web-based application. We also believe our customers and
potential customers are becoming increasingly focused upon legal and regulatory compliance obligations, which presents opportunities
for us. For example, our SubscribeNet service includes a number of features designed to help customers comply with various legal and
accounting requirements such as export control and proper revenue recognition. We believe these compliance features are of growing
importance in our market and offer an additional basis for marketing our service. With this opportunity comes risk, however, if our
service fails to meet compliance standards in any significant manner.

We also face a number of other key risks that are described in more detail in the "Risk Factors" beginning on page 22.

We earn revenues and generate cash principally through recurring service fees charged for our SubscribeNet service, and
professional services fees charged for customization of our SubscribeNet service.

We have incurred losses and negative cash flow from operations during each fiscal year since inception. Net loss for the three and
six months ended August 31, 2006 increased from our prior year loss for the corresponding period. For the six months ended August
31, 2006, we recorded cash provided from operating activities of $0.1 million, which was consistent with the corresponding period in the
prior year. Our cash balances may decline further, although we believe that the effects of our capital financing, strategic actions
implemented to improve revenue, and cost controls will be adequate to generate sufficient cash resources to fund our future
operations.  If we fail to generate sufficient revenues or adequately control spending, we may be unable to achieve key business
objectives.

14



---





We believe that the effects of our capital financings to date, our past and current strategic actions to improve revenue, and our
ongoing cost controls, will generate sufficient cash resources to fund our future operations. However, if we fail to adequately increase
our revenues or control spending, our business could suffer material adverse effects.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. In preparing these financial statements, we
are required to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments. We base our estimates and judgments on historical
experience and on various other factors we believe reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We consider accounting policies related to revenue recognition, costs of deferred revenue, stock-based compensation, allowance
for doubtful accounts, and income taxes to be critical accounting policies due to the estimation process involved in each.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are met:

- There is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
- We have provided the service to the customer, made the software available for customer download through
our website, or shipped the software to the customer;
- We believe collection of these fees is reasonably assured; and
- The amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.

Our online services and technology revenue results primarily from three types of arrangements. First, it results
from sales of our SubscribeNet digital delivery service to software vendors and other companies that distribute software as part of their
business. Second, it results from professional services that we provide to customize our SubscribeNet service for customers, to convert
data for customers, and to integrate our proprietary software. Third, it results from our resale of third-party services or licenses
complementary to our SubscribeNet service, one of which is e-commerce. In addition, if appropriate opportunities present themselves in
the future, we may generate online services and technology revenue from the sale of our proprietary software licenses, and related
maintenance, to companies using those products internally or using those products to provide web-based services to their customers.
As a result of the sale of our Asset Management software business in May 2002, we are not currently deriving revenue from licenses,
maintenance or integration services for asset management software.

Alliance and reimbursement revenue primarily relates to our recently terminated alliance agreement with
Software Spectrum for sales and marketing services. This revenue consisted of a percentage of the gross profit derived from Software
Spectrum's sales of the third-party software and maintenance for which we provided sales and marketing services, and, prior to August
1, 2005, reimbursement for the costs of maintaining a sales team dedicated to providing sales and marketing services to Software
Spectrum for that third-party software and maintenance. This revenue was recognized as we provided the services to Software
Spectrum. On August 1, 2005, we signed an updated agreement with Software Spectrum. Under the updated agreement, Software
Spectrum paid us a higher percentage of the gross profit derived from its sales of Sun software licenses and maintenance. However,
Software Spectrum stopped reimbursing us for our direct costs in maintaining a team dedicated to sales of Sun software licenses and
maintenance. We terminated our alliance agreement with Software Spectrum effective January 3, 2006, and ceased recognizing
alliance and reimbursement revenue on that date.

We defer online services and technology revenues related to our SubscribeNet digital delivery service and
generally recognize them ratably over the term of the service arrangement. The typical subscription term is one year, although some
may be shorter or extend up to approximately 3 years. Our customer contracts are generally noncancelable, though customers typically
have the right to terminate their contracts for cause if we materially fail to perform. A majority of our SubscribeNet service
implementations for new customers involve customization essential to the functionality of the service. In these cases, we defer revenue
recognition until the service go-live date is reached, and then recognize the revenue on a ratable basis over the remaining contract
term. The go-live date is the later of the date on which the essential functionality is delivered or the point at which no additional
customization is required. Our SubscribeNet contracts with customers typically give the customer a period of time (generally five days)
to evaluate a SubscribeNet implementation after we have completed it, and provide that the customer is deemed to have accepted the
implementation if it has not affirmatively rejected it within that period. We typically rely on such non-rejections by customers to indicate
their acceptance of implementations. Any subsequent indications by our customers that their implementations have not been properly
completed could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

15



---





We also sell additional professional services related to SubscribeNet agreements. Generally, these services do
not provide stand-alone value to a customer and, accordingly, we defer recognition of this revenue until the go-live date for the
professional services, similar to the manner in which we treat SubscribeNet service revenues discussed above. Such professional
services revenues are recognized ratably over the longer of the remaining estimated customer life or the remaining contract term,
commencing with the completion of the professional services. Estimated customer life requires that we periodically estimate the
projected life of our existing customers based on historical information such as customer renewal rates. Our estimated customer life has
increased over time due to relatively high customer retention rates. We expect the projected customer life to continue to increase as
customers lengthen and renew their service agreements. A 10% increase in our estimated customer life during the three and six
months ended August 31, 2006, would have caused a net increase in our net loss of approximately $6,000 and $12,000 respectively. In
some instances the implementation of the SubscribeNet service and professional services are bundled into the initial agreement without
specifically stating the fees for each one. In these instances the professional services fees are recognized from acceptance to the end
of the remaining contract term on a ratable basis with the SubscribeNet fee.

Online services and technology revenues related to our resale of third-party services or software licenses
complementary to our SubscribeNet service are generally recognized as the service is provided. If the service or license resold involves
customization essential to the functionality of the underlying SubscribeNet service, the fees charged for the customization are
recognized as revenue in the same manner as professional services discussed above. Resold services or licenses are recognized as
revenue based on the gross fee charged to the customer, since we bear the credit risk for resold services or licenses, have latitude in
establishing pricing, and are primarily responsible for acceptability of the services or licenses delivered. In addition, costs paid to the
third-party providers are recorded as cost of revenues and recognized in the same manner as the related revenue.

Deferred Costs

We capitalize direct costs of revenues related to significant SubscribeNet service implementations and established professional
services contracts associated with our SubscribeNet services. Direct costs include compensation and payroll-related fringe benefits
directly related to the time spent on significant implementation and professional services activities. These costs are recognized over the
same period as the related revenue is recognized (see Revenue Recognition above). Costs associated with professional services
involving significant new functionality for the SubscribeNet service that are partially or fully funded by customers but do not qualify as
funded research and development activities are expensed as costs of revenues as incurred until a working model is delivered to the
customer. Once a working model has been delivered, all additional direct costs are capitalized in the same manner discussed above.
Any change in our revenue recognition estimates could result in corresponding changes to our recognition of costs of deferred
revenues. A 10% increase in our estimated customer life during the three and six months ended August 31, 2006, would have caused a
net increase in our net loss of approximately $6,000 and $12,000, respectively. At August 31, 2006, we had approximately $0.9 million
in capitalized costs relating to deferred revenues. We expense customer acquisition costs, including sales commissions, as incurred.
We also defer legal costs incurred in connection with patent applications. As of August 31, 2006 we had $0.2 million in deferred legal
costs. Upon issuance of a patent, the deferred legal costs for that patent are expensed ratably over the patent's useful life.

Stock-based Compensation

On March 1, 2006, Intraware adopted SFAS 123(R), which addresses the accounting for share-based payment
transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of the company or liabilities that
are based on the fair value of the company's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.
Using the modified prospective method, we estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model, consistent
with the provisions of "Share-Based Payment, an amendment of FASB Statements Nos.123 and 95" ("SFAS 123(R)"), Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 ("SAB 107"), and "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123") for our prior period pro forma
disclosures of net earnings. Option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option's expected
life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. Judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock-based awards that are
expected to be forfeited. If actual results or future changes in estimates differ significantly from our current estimates, stock-based
compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted. Furthermore, there are no means under applicable
accounting principles to compare and adjust our expense if and when we learn of additional information that may affect our previous
estimates, with the exception of changes in expected forfeitures of share-based awards. Over time, factors may arise that cause us to
change our estimates and assumptions with respect to future share-based compensation arrangements, resulting in variability in our
share-based compensation expense. In addition, any future accounting pronouncements, taxation rules, and new interpretations of
existing accounting pronouncements or taxation rules, could have a significant effect on our reported results, including our reporting of
transactions completed before the effective date of the change.

16



---





The following table presents the stock compensation expense recognized in accordance with SFAS 123(R) during the three and six
months ended August 31, 2006:

|                               |  |   | Three Months Ended August 31, 2006 |  |  |            |   | Six Months Ended August 31, 2006 | 
|------------------------------ |  | - | ---------------------------------- |  |  | ---------- | - | -------------------------------- | 
|                               |  |   | Stock                              |  |  | Percent of |   |                                  | 
|                               |  |   | Compensation                       |  |  | Total      |   |                                  | 
|(In thousands)                 |  |   | Expense                            |  |  | Expense    |   |                                  | 
|Cost of revenues:              |  |   |                                    |  |  |            |   |                                  | 
|Online services and technology |  | $ | 35                                 |  |  | 13         | % |                                  | 
|Sales and marketing            |  |   | 52                                 |  |  | 20         | % |                                  | 
|Research and development       |  |   | 27                                 |  |  | 9          | % |                                  | 
|General and administrative     |  |   | 161                                |  |  | 58         | % |                                  | 
|                               |  |   |                                    |  |  |            |   |                                  | 
|Total stock-based compensation |  | $ | 275                                |  |  |            |   |                                  | 

Web Site Development Costs

We account for Web site development costs in accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-2, which requires that certain costs to
develop Web sites be capitalized or expensed, depending on the nature of the costs. We amortize web site development costs using
the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of two years.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses from our inability to collect required
payments from our customers. When evaluating the adequacy of this allowance, we analyze specific accounts receivable, historical bad
debts, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customers' payment history. We may need to record
increases to our allowance balances in the future. At August 31, 2006, we had many accounts receivable balances. Any dispute, early
contract termination or other collection issue related to these receivable balances could have a material adverse impact on our financial
condition or result of operations.

Income Taxes

In conjunction with preparing our financial statements, we must estimate our income taxes in each of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets
and liabilities. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the
extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Given that we have incurred losses since
inception and therefore have not been required to pay income taxes, we have fully reserved our deferred tax assets at August 31, 2006.
In the event we are able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income
in the period that in which they are realized.

Results of Operations

Total Revenue

The following table sets forth the revenue, changes in revenue and percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated (in
thousands, except percentage amounts):

|                               |  |   | For the three months ended |  |   | For the six months ended
|------------------------------ |  | - | -------------------------- |  | - | ------------------------
|                               |  |   | August 31, 2006            |  |   | August 31, 2005         
|                               |  |   | Total                      |  |   | Change                  
|Revenues:                      |  |   |                            |  |   |                         
|Online services and technology |  | $ | 2,582                      |  | $ | 117                     
|Alliance and reimbursement     |  |   | -                          |  |   | (602)                   
|Total revenues                 |  | $ | 2,582                      |  | $ | (485)                   

Combined online services and technology revenue results primarily from sales of our SubscribeNet services.  The online
services and technology revenue increase during the three months ended August 31, 2006, as compared to the three months ended
August 31, 2005, is primarily due to two factors: first, approximately $0.5 million in revenue was recognized from both new
SubscribeNet customers whose go-live date was achieved between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006, and existing customers
who expanded their agreements; and second, approximately $0.1 million in additional revenue was recognized as a result of additional
professional services provided to existing

17



---





SubscribeNet customers. These increases were partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in
revenue related to the Software Spectrum reseller agreement and a decrease of $0.2 million in relation to customers who terminated
their contracts. The online services and technology revenue increase during the six months ended August 31, 2006, as compared to the
six months ended August 31, 2005, is primarily due to two factors: first, approximately $0.8 million in revenue was recognized from both
new SubscribeNet customers whose go-live date was achieved between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006, and existing
customers who expanded their agreements; and second, approximately $0.3 million in additional revenue was recognized as a result of
professional services provided to existing SubscribeNet customers. These increases were partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in
revenue related to the Software Spectrum reseller agreement and a decrease of $0.3 million in relation to customers who terminated
their contracts. We expect our online services and technology revenue for our third quarter ending November 30, 2006, to slightly
increase from our second quarter, which ended August 31, 2006.

Alliance and reimbursement revenue relates to our alliance agreement with Software Spectrum for sales of Sun software licenses
and maintenance, which we terminated January 3, 2006. This revenue consisted of a percentage of the gross profit derived from the
sales of Sun software licenses and maintenance services, and reimbursement for the costs of maintaining a sales team dedicated to
selling Sun software for Software Spectrum. We ceased recognizing alliance and reimbursement revenue in our fiscal year ended
February 28, 2006.

Costs and Expenses

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, changes in costs and expenses and percentage of total revenue for the
periods indicated (in thousands, except percentage amounts):

|                           |  |   | For the three months ended |  |   | For the six months ended
|-------------------------- |  | - | -------------------------- |  | - | ------------------------
|                           |  |   | August 31, 2006            |  |   | August 31, 2005         
|                           |  |   | Total                      |  |   | Change                  
|                           |  |   |                            |  |   |                         
|Total cost of revenues     |  | $ | 1,084                      |  | $ | (388)                   
|Gross margin               |  |   | 1,498                      |  |   | (97)                    
|Operating expenses:        |  |   |                            |  |   |                         
|Sales and marketing        |  |   | 669                        |  |   | 74                      
|Product development        |  |   | 502                        |  |   | 167                     
|General and administrative |  |   | 1,125                      |  |   | 223                     
|Total operating expenses   |  | $ | 2,296                      |  | $ | 464                     

Cost of Revenues

The decrease in cost of revenues and increase in margin percentage for the three months ended August 31, 2006, is primarily
due to a decrease of approximately $0.4 million that was attributed to the alliance and reimbursement cost of revenues. The decrease
in cost of revenues and increase in margin percentage for the six months ended August 31, 2006, is primarily due to a decrease of
approximately $0.8 million that was attributed to the alliance and reimbursement cost of revenues. The additional decrease of
approximately $0.1 million dollar is in online services and technology cost of revenues and is attributed to a specific statement of work
under which the costs were expensed rather than deferred for the six months ended August 31, 2005.

Cost of revenues primarily consists of certain allocated costs related to our internet connectivity, assets supporting cost of
revenues, and customer support, and in the prior year, the costs associated with maintaining our team dedicated to helping Software
Spectrum sell Sun software. Cost of revenues also consists of professional services personnel costs and the cost of third-party
products and services sold.  We expect total cost of revenues for the current fiscal year to be lower than fiscal 2006. This
is primarily due to the termination of our agreement with Software Spectrum, whereby we will no longer be recognizing any associated
costs previously recorded as alliance and reimbursement cost of revenues. In addition, we expect our gross profit margin percentage
for the current fiscal year to be higher than those in fiscal 2006. Our quarterly cost of revenues may fluctuate based on multiple
variables, including without limitations, revenue mix fluctuations, levels of professional services activities, infrastructure costs, and
variable external support utilization rates. We expect our margins to fluctuate accordingly.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee salaries, benefits and commissions, advertising, consulting,
promotional materials, trade show expenses and certain allocated overhead costs.

The increase in sales and marketing expense for the three and six months ended August 31, 2006, compared to the three and six
months ended August 31, 2005, is primarily due to our increased efforts in marketing and advertising. We plan to increase our overall
sales and marketing expenses in the current fiscal year. There was also an increase of approximately $0.05 million and $0.1 million for
the three and six months ended August 31, 2006, respectively, related to stock-based compensation expense recognized in
accordance with FAS 123(R).

18



---





Product Development Expenses

Product development expenses consist primarily of employee salaries and benefits, consulting, software and related
maintenance, equipment depreciation expense and allocated overhead costs. Costs related to research, design and development of
products and services have been charged to product development expense as incurred.

The increase in our product development expenses for the three and six months ended August 31, 2006, compared to those for the
three and six months ended August 31, 2005, is primarily due to two factors; first, stock-based compensation expense recognized in
accordance with FAS 123(R) of $0.1million and $0.2 million, respectively; and second, $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in
expenditures that were a result of variable support costs and incremental investments in our infrastructure in relation to product
development activities. We also incurred increased expenses related to consulting and recruiting fees for personnel involved in product
development activities. These expenses were partially offset by decreases in expenses related to depreciation and maintenance.

We anticipate continued investment in additional functionality for our SubscribeNet service and underlying proprietary software.
However, we expect those investments to fluctuate over time, and expect our product development expenses to vary accordingly. We
expect total product development expenditures to increase in our fiscal year ending February 28, 2007. We cannot guarantee that our
product development efforts will result in new or improved products, features or functionality, or that the market will accept the
improvements to existing or new products, features or functionality developed.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for administrative and executive personnel, fees for
professional services and certain overhead costs.

The increase in our general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended August 31, 2006, compared to the
three and six months ended August 31, 2005, is primarily due to approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for
stock-based compensation expense recognized in accordance with FAS 123(R). We also had an increase in personnel expenses related to
compensation and recruiting fees of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which was partially offset by a decrease in legal
expenses of approximately $0.1 million for each of the three and six month periods ending August 31, 2006.

We expect total expenditures in fiscal year 2007 to increase from our fiscal year 2006 levels due to increased personnel costs and
external fees.

Interest Expense

For the three months ended August 31, 2006, interest expense was approximately $10,000, a decrease from $16,000 for the
three months ended August 31, 2005.  For the six months ended August 31, 2006, interest expense was approximately $21,000,
a decrease from $35,000 for the six months ended August 31, 2005.

Interest expense primarily relates to obligations under capital leases and notes payable.  The decrease in interest expense
for the three and six months ended August 31, 2006 is primarily due to the reduction of the principal balance on our notes payable,
slightly offset by higher interest rates.

Interest and Other Income and Expenses, Net

For the three months ended August 31, 2006, interest and other income and expenses, net was approximately $145,000 of
income, an increase from $61,000 of income for the three months ended August 31, 2005. For the six months ended August 31,
2006, interest and other income and expenses, net was approximately $434,000 of income, an increase from $114,000 of income for
the six months ended August 31, 2005.

Interest and other income and expenses, net, primarily relates to interest earned on our investment balances.  The increase
in interest and other income and expenses, net for the three months ended August 31, 2006 is primarily the result of several factors: (1)
increased investment balances, resulting from the $6 million investment in our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock by Digital River in
November 2005; (2) a sustained cash balance from the prior year; and (3) an increase in the interest rates in the investment account.
The increase in interest and other income and expenses, net for the six months ended August 31, 2006 is primarily the result of the
previously mentioned factors, and the settlement of a litigation matter entitled Leon Segen v. ComVest Venture Partners, LP et
al, from which we received $152,366. The settlement did not require shareholder approval.

Income Taxes

As of February 28, 2006, we had approximately $90 million of federal and $45 million of state net operating loss carryforwards
available to offset future taxable income, which expire in varying amounts between fiscal years 2007 and 2026. The Tax Reform Act of
1986 limits the use of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards in certain circumstances where changes occur in the stock
ownership of a company. Because of cumulative ownership changes in the past, the federal and state loss carryforwards have
been reduced by the amount of

19



---





the net operating loss carryforwards that will expire. Because of these cumulative ownership changes,
federal loss carry forwards totaling approximately $42 million and state loss carry forwards totaling approximately $19 million are
subject to limitation. At February 28, 2006, $48 million and $26 million of federal and state net operating losses, respectively, are
available without limitation to offset future taxable income. Should there be a future change of ownership, the available net operating
losses may be further limited.  Based upon our limited operating history and losses incurred to date, management does not
believe the realization of the related deferred tax assets meets the recognition criteria required by generally accepted accounting
principles and accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been recorded to reduce the carrying value of the deferred tax assets to
zero.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents our liquidity position at August 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

|                                          |  |   | For the six months ended
|----------------------------------------- |  | - | ------------------------
|                                          |  |   | August 31, 2006         
|                                          |  |   |                         
|Cash and cash equivalents                 |  | $ | 12,542                  
|Working capital                           |  | $ | 10,317                  
|Net cash provided by operating activities |  | $ | 110                     
|Net cash used in financing activities     |  | $ | (46)                    
|Net cash used in investing activities     |  | $ | (172)                   

At August 31, 2006 we had $12.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. At August 31, 2006 our working capital was $10.3 million.

Our net cash provided by operations was $0.1 million for the six months ended August 31, 2006, which was consistent with the
cash provided by operations for the six months ended August 31, 2005. In the first six months of fiscal 2007 our positive operating cash
flow was primarily due to increased collection efforts. Our ability to improve our uses of cash and generate continued positive cash
flows in future periods will largely depend on our ability to increase the number of customers of our SubscribeNet service while
increasing existing subscriptions through strong contract renewals. We expect our cash balances to fluctuate from time to time due to
the timing of customer collections and vendor payments in the ordinary course of business.

Our net cash used by financing activities was approximately $46,000 for the six months ended August 31, 2006.  This
primarily resulted from principal payments of approximately $240,000 on notes payable offset by additional borrowings under our
equipment advance agreement (see below) of approximately $137,000, and by our issuance of approximately 17,400 shares of
common stock in connection with our stock option and employee stock purchase plans for proceeds of approximately $57,000.

As of August 31, 2006, we have three equipment advance agreements with Silicon Valley Bank, under which we have three
equipment advances outstanding.  The equipment advances bear annual interest rates of the greater of 1% in excess of the
bank's prime rate (8.25% at August 31, 2006) or rates of 5.50%, 5.50% and 7% respectively, and are payable in fixed monthly
installments through September 2006, 2007 and December 2008, respectively.  At August 31, 2006, the interest rate for
each of the equipment advances was 9.25%.

Under the agreements, all borrowings are collateralized by a senior security interest in substantially all of our assets. The
agreements also require us to comply with financial covenants, with which we were in compliance as of August 31, 2006. The
agreements further restrict us from incurring or assuming additional indebtedness outside of the note payable and equipment advances,
excluding trade payables and certain other liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business.

Our net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended August 31, 2006 was $0.2 million. This amount was
comprised of our purchases of fixed assets. We paid for these equipment purchases from our cash and cash equivalents, but later drew
down approximately $0.1 million under the above-mentioned equipment advance agreement to finance these purchases. We used
these fixed asset purchases primarily to upgrade and expand our SubscribeNet infrastructure and corporate information systems. We
expect to continue using and renewing our equipment advances to finance additional fixed asset purchases.

We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with any cash generated from future operations, will be sufficient to
fund our operating activities, capital expenditures and financing arrangements for the foreseeable future. However, if our SubscribeNet
business fails to grow significantly or declines from its current level, we could be forced to seek additional capital.

At August 31, 2006, we had no relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to
as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

20



---





The following table summarizes our debt and lease obligations at August 31, 2006, and the effect such obligations are expected to
have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands). This table provides information through our year ending
February 28, 2010, as we do not have any debt or lease obligations beyond that point.

|                 |  |   | Payments due by period
|---------------- |  | - | ----------------------
|                 |  |   | Total                 
|Long-term debt   |  | $ | 455                   
|Operating leases |  |   | 1,585                 
|                 |  | $ | 2,040                 

(a)   Includes payments from September 1, 2007 through February 28, 2010.

(b)   This amount includes approximately $27,000 in interest.

As of August 31, 2006, our Series A and Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock entitled holders to liquidation
preferences of $0.5 million and $6.0 million, respectively, in the event of certain liquidation events with respect to Intraware.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

At August 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $12.5 million. We have not used derivative financial
instruments in our investment portfolio during fiscal 2006 or the six months ended August 31, 2006. We place our investments with high
quality issuers, by policy, in an effort to limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issue or issuer.

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash and cash equivalents portfolio, note payable
and lines of credit. We have not used derivative financial instruments. The effect of changes in interest rates of +/-10% over a six-month
horizon would not materially affect the fair value of the portfolio or our debt. Declines in interest rates will, over time, decrease the
interest income from our portfolio.  Increases in interest rates will increase the interest we pay on our credit facilities.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the controls
and procedures required by paragraph (b) of the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15.

(b)  Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. No changes in our internal controls over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In re Intraware, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

In October 2001, we were served with a summons and complaint in a purported securities class action lawsuit. On or about
April 19, 2002, we were served with an amended complaint in this action, which is now titled In re Intraware, Inc. Initial Public
Offering Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 01-9349 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation,
21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.). The amended complaint is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock
from February 25, 1999 (the date of our initial public offering) through December 6, 2000. It names as defendants Intraware, three of
our present and former officers and directors, and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of our initial public
offering. The complaint alleges liability under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the registration statement for the offerings did not disclose that: (1) the
underwriters had agreed to allow certain customers to purchase shares in the offerings in exchange for excess commissions paid to the
underwriters; and (2) the underwriters had arranged for certain customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at
predetermined prices. The amended complaint also alleges that the underwriters misused their securities analysts to manipulate the
price of our stock. No specific damages are claimed.

Lawsuits containing similar allegations have been filed in the Southern District of New York challenging over 300 other initial public
offerings and secondary offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. All of these lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial purposes before

21



---





United States District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin of the Southern District of New York. On July 15, 2002, an omnibus motion
to dismiss was filed in the coordinated litigation on behalf of the issuer defendants, of which Intraware and its three named current and
former officers and directors are a part, on common pleadings issues. On or about October 9, 2002, the Court entered and ordered a
Stipulation of Dismissal, which dismissed the three named current and former officers and directors from the litigation without prejudice.
On February 19, 2003, the Court entered an order denying in part the issuer-defendants' omnibus motion to dismiss, including those
portions of the motion to dismiss relating to Intraware.

In June 2004, a stipulation of settlement for the claims against the issuer-defendants, including us, was submitted to the Court. The
underwriter-defendants in the In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation (collectively, the "underwriter-defendants"),
including the underwriters of our initial public offering, are not parties to the stipulation of settlement.

The settlement provides that, in exchange for a release of claims against the settling issuer-defendants, the insurers of all of the
settling issuer-defendants will provide a surety undertaking to guarantee plaintiffs a $1 billion recovery from the non-settling defendants,
including the underwriter-defendants. The amount our insurers would be required to pay to the plaintiffs could range from zero to
approximately $3.5 million, depending on plaintiffs' recovery from the underwriter-defendants and from other non-settling parties. If the
plaintiffs recover at least $1 billion from the underwriter-defendants, our insurers would have no liability for settlement payments under
the terms of the settlement. If the plaintiffs recover less than $1 billion, we believe our insurance will likely cover our share of any
payments towards satisfying plaintiffs' $1 billion recovery deficit. Management estimates that its range of loss relative to this matter is
zero to $3.5 million. Presently there is no more likely point estimate of loss within this range. As a consequence of the uncertainties
described above regarding the amount we will ultimately be required to pay, if any, as of August 31, 2006, we have not accrued a
liability for this matter.

On August 31, 2005, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A fairness hearing for the settlement took place in
April 2006. After the hearing, the court took the matter under submission and has not yet issued a final ruling.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making a decision to invest in our common stock. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing Intraware. Additional risks and uncertainties presently unknown to us, or that
we do not currently believe are important to an investor, may also harm our business operations. If any of the events, contingencies,
circumstances or conditions described in the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be seriously harmed. If that occurs, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose part or all of your
investment.

We have a history of losses and negative cash flow, and we have yet to achieve sustained profitability or positive cash
flow.

We have incurred significant losses since we were formed in 1996, totaling approximately $159.3 million, and have yet to
achieve sustained profitability or positive cash flow. Also, with the exception of our quarters ended November 30, 2002, August 31,
2005 and August 31, 2006, we have not achieved positive cash flow from operations since our formation in 1996. We expect to report
an overall cash usage from operations for our 2007 fiscal year. We cannot predict whether or when we will be able to achieve sustained
profitability or positive cash flow in the future.

The market for our SubscribeNet electronic software and license delivery and management service is immature and volatile. If
the market for our service does not develop, or develops more slowly than we expect, our business will be harmed.

The market for hosted digital delivery services is relatively unproven, and it is uncertain whether these services will achieve
and sustain high levels of demand and market acceptance. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the willingness of
companies, large and small, to increase their use of hosted digital delivery services. If companies do not increase their use of hosted
digital delivery services, our operating results will suffer. In addition, in this unproven market, we have limited insight into trends that
may develop and affect our business. We may make errors in predicting and reacting to relevant business trends, which could harm our
business.

We market our SubscribeNet electronic software and license delivery and management service principally to software companies.
However, many software companies have invested substantial personnel and financial resources in developing their own electronic
software and/or license delivery systems, and therefore may be unwilling to migrate to and pay for an outsourced service. In addition,
some software companies have adopted automatic update, or "phone home," technology for delivering software updates, whereby an
end-user's computer automatically contacts the software company's server to check whether updates are available and, if so,
downloads and installs those updates. While SubscribeNet supports such an approach, this method for delivering software updates
could be viewed by our potential and existing customers as an alternative to our digital delivery technology, and therefore any increased
adoption of this automatic update technology could hurt our business and results of operations.

Further, some companies may be reluctant to use either our SubscribeNet delivery services because they are concerned about the
security capabilities of these services.

22



---





Competition from other electronic delivery and licensing providers, and potential customer development of in-house electronic
delivery and/or licensing systems, could limit our revenue growth and reduce our gross margins.

The market for selling electronic delivery and licensing services is highly competitive. Some of our competitors have longer
operating histories, greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, broader product and service offerings, better name
recognition, and a larger installed base of customers than we do. Some of our competitors also have well-established relationships with
our potential customers and with third-party information technology or consulting firms that help market our competitors' services. We
expect competition to intensify as current competitors expand and improve their service offerings and new competitors enter the
market. In addition, our current and potential customers are primarily information technology companies with strong software
development expertise. When considering their alternatives for implementing a system for electronic delivery of software or license
keys, these companies sometimes elect to develop such systems in-house. While we believe our competitive position is strong against
both external competitors and in-house development, we have at times experienced reduced prices, reduced gross margins and lost
sales as a result of such competitive factors. Such competition is likely to intensify, which could limit the growth of our revenues and
gross margins.

The loss of one or more of our key customers could cause our revenue growth to slow or cause our revenues to decline.

A substantial portion of the revenues from our SubscribeNet service comes from a relatively small number of customers.
Our contracts with most of these customers are subject to renewal or cancellation annually. If any of these customers elected to cancel
their agreements with us, our revenue growth would likely slow and our revenues could decline.

Mergers and acquisitions in the technology sector could harm us by causing cancellation of customer contracts where our
customers are acquired, or by strengthening our competitors.

In recent years, there has been an increase in mergers and acquisitions among technology companies. This trend poses risks
for us. First, our customers are technology companies, and any acquisitions of our customers could lead to cancellation of our contracts
with those customers by the acquiring companies. Second, our competitors also are technology companies. Any acquisitions of other
companies by our competitors, or acquisitions of our competitors by other companies, are likely to result in larger and stronger
companies competing against us. Either of these types of events could reduce our revenue through loss of existing customers, or
reduce our margins through increased price competition.

Our current strategy includes the use of strategic marketing relationships, which may prove unsuccessful.

We currently have marketing relationships in place with Digital River, Inc., Hewlett Packard, Corp., On Demand Delivery, Inc.
dba Nextra, and Zomax, Inc. We also have a reseller relationship with Akamai Technologies, Inc., under which we resell the Akamai
service to our SubscribeNet customers. Of particular importance to us is our joint marketing relationship with Digital River. We believe
this alliance agreement could help further expand our electronic delivery service into the consumer software market, where Digital River
has a much larger presence than we do, while at the same time enabling us to offer e-commerce services to our existing installed base
and to other prospective customers in the enterprise software market. We believe that gaining a greater presence in the consumer
software market, and enhancing our offering to include e-commerce services, both can play an important role in our future growth. Our
relationships with Zomax, On Demand Delivery, and Hewlett Packard have yet to produce significant revenue, however, and it is
possible our more recent relationships with Digital River and Akamai Technologies will prove less beneficial than we currently expect, in
which case our business could suffer.

Although our subscription-based sales model for our SubscribeNet service limits the volatility of our online services and
technology revenue, other factors may cause our operating results, and therefore our stock price, to fluctuate.

Our SubscribeNet service fees, which comprise most of our online services and technology revenues, are recognized ratably
over contract terms of generally one year, thereby limiting the quarter-to-quarter volatility of those revenues. Nevertheless, certain
factors may cause our online services and technology revenues to fluctuate. In addition to the other risk factors described in this
section, factors that could cause such fluctuation include:

- Deferral of SubscribeNet revenue recognition due to delays by customers in implementing the SubscribeNet service, due to new
sales involving extensive implementations, or due to contract modifications adding significant future deliverables;
- Unexpected increases in customer cancellations, which could result from service deficiencies, or from external conditions or
circumstances beyond our control;
- Lengthening of the sales cycle for our SubscribeNet service due to macroeconomic or other factors;
- Actual events, circumstances, outcomes, and amounts differing from judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in determining
the values of certain assets (including the amounts of related valuation allowances), liabilities and other items reflected in our
consolidated financial statements or unaudited interim consolidated financial statements; and
- Changes in accounting rules, such as recording expenses for employee stock option grants.

23



---





Consequently, operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict, and prior results are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected in future periods. Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our results of operations and stock
price.

The technological and functional requirements we must meet to stay competitive are subject to rapid change. If we are unable
to quickly adapt to these changes and meet the demands of our current and potential customers, we will likely lose sales and market
share and our revenue growth will be limited.

We market primarily to software publishers, who generally demand that a service like ours meet high technological and
functional standards. To remain competitive in this market and meet the demands of current and prospective customers, we must
continually adapt and upgrade our technology and functionality. We are a small company with limited resources available for enhancing
and expanding our services. If we do not respond quickly enough to changing industry standards or the increased demands of
customers and potential customers, we will likely lose sales and market share to competitors and our growth prospects will be limited.
In addition, we could incur substantial costs to modify our services or infrastructure in order to adapt to changing standards and
demands. If we incur such costs and our sales fail to increase commensurately, we may not be able to achieve sustained profitability
and positive operating cash flow.

Defects in our SubscribeNet service could diminish demand for the service and subject us to substantial liability.

Our service is complex, and may have errors or defects that users identify after they begin using it, which could harm our
reputation and our business. Internet-based services frequently contain undetected errors when first introduced or when new versions
or enhancements are released. Despite taking precautions to avoid errors, we have found defects in our service from time to time, and
we may find new errors in our existing service in the future. Because our customers use our service for important aspects of their
business, any errors, defects or other performance problems with our service could hurt our reputation and may damage our customers'
businesses. If that occurs, customers could elect not to renew their agreements with us, could be eligible for credits under our service
level agreements, and could delay or withhold payment to us. We also could lose future sales, or customers may make warranty claims
against us, which could result in an increase in our provision for doubtful accounts, an increase in collection cycles for accounts
receivable, or the expense and risk of litigation.

Interruptions or delays in service from our third-party Web hosting facilities, or in our relationships with third party hardware and
software vendors, could impair the delivery of our service and harm our business.

We provide our service through computer hardware that is currently located in third-party Web hosting facilities in Santa Clara,
California operated by SAVVIS Communications, and in Ireland operated by Data Electronics. We do not control the operation of these
facilities, and they are subject to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunications failures and
similar events. While physical security measures are in place, they are also subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism
and similar misconduct. Despite precautions taken at the facilities, the occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision to close a facility
without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems at a facility, could result in lengthy interruptions in our service. In addition, the
failure by either facility to provide our required data communications capacity could result in interruptions in our service. We have an
agreement with SBC E-Services, an affiliate of SBC Communications, Inc., to provide access to a geographically remote disaster
recovery facility that would provide us access to hardware, software and Internet connectivity in the event the SAVVIS facility becomes
unavailable. Even with this disaster recovery arrangement, however, our service would be interrupted during the transition. Any damage
to, or failure of, our systems could result in interruptions in our service. Interruptions in our service may reduce our revenue, cause us to
issue credits or pay penalties, cause customers to terminate their subscriptions and adversely affect our renewal rates. Our business
will be harmed if our customers and potential customers believe our service is unreliable.

In addition, to a significant degree, we rely on various third-party software applications and hardware to deliver our service. If we
experience disruptions in those vendor relationships and those software and hardware components become unavailable to us, or
unavailable on commercially reasonable terms, our service could be interrupted and/or damaged, causing harm to our customer
relationships, our reputation, and our overall business.

The Market for Our Proposed Digital Fastball Service is Unproven.

We continue to develop a production release of a new service called Digital Fastball, which we hope will leverage our digital
delivery expertise to enable small and medium-sized businesses, as well as consumers, to send, receive and manage many types and
sizes of digital files over the Internet quickly, easily and securely. We plan to market our Digital Fastball service principally to small and
medium-sized companies that need to send large digital files as part of their businesses. However, many systems are already available
for sharing files over the Internet, in some cases at little or no cost. In addition, some such systems have been the targets of widely
publicized litigation by copyright holders, which may make some companies reluctant to use Internet-based digital delivery services
such as Digital Fastball.

Further, some companies may be reluctant to use either our SubscribeNet or Digital Fastball hosted digital delivery services
because they are concerned about the security capabilities of these services. If our development or marketing efforts prove
unsuccessful with respect to Digital Fastball, we may not generate any profit or even recover our investments in the Digital Fastball
service, in which case our business could suffer.

24



---





Our operating results could vary due to the methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies,
particularly SFAS No. 123(R).

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies significantly impact our results of
operations Those methods, estimates and judgments are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
and factors may arise over time that lead us to change our methods, estimates and judgments. In particular, the calculation of share-
based compensation expense under SFAS No. 123(R)-which we adopted as of the fiscal quarter beginning March 1, 2006-requires
that we use valuation methodologies and a number of assumptions, estimates and conclusions regarding matters such as expected
terms, expected forfeitures, expected volatility of our share price, the expected dividend rate with respect to our common stock and the
exercise behavior of our employees. Furthermore, there are no means, under applicable accounting principles, to compare and adjust
our expense if and when we learn of additional information that may affect our previous estimates, with the exception of changes in
expected forfeitures of share-based awards. Over time, factors may arise that cause us to change our estimates and assumptions with
respect to future share-based compensation arrangements, resulting in variability in our share-based compensation expense. In
addition, any future accounting pronouncements, taxation rules, and new interpretations of existing accounting pronouncements or
taxation rules, could also have a significant effect on our reported results, including our reporting of transactions completed before the
effective date of the change.

Provisions of our charter documents could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the offer may be
considered beneficial by our stockholders, which could depress the trading price of our common stock.

Our charter documents, as well as our Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Rights Agreement, contain provisions that
could depress the trading price of our common stock by acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or
changes in our management that the stockholders of our company may deem advantageous. Among other things, these provisions:

- trigger certain shareholder rights in the event a person or entity acquires more than fifteen percent of our voting securities (or up to
twenty percent in the case of Crosslink Capital, Inc.);
- establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board are elected at one time;
- require super-majority voting to amend some provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws;
- authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that our board could issue to increase the number of outstanding shares
and to discourage a takeover attempt;
- prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
- provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our bylaws; and
- establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by
stockholders at stockholder meetings.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of
our company. Section 203 imposes certain restrictions on merger, business combinations and other transactions between us and
holders of 15 percent or more of our common stock.

Viruses may hinder acceptance of Internet-based digital delivery, which could in turn limit our revenue growth.

The proliferation of software viruses is a key risk that could inhibit acceptance by information technology professionals of
Web-based delivery of digital goods. Any well-publicized transmission of a computer virus by us or another company using digital
delivery could deter information technology professionals from using-and deter software providers from outsourcing-digital delivery,
thereby adversely affecting our business. Our SubscribeNet service enables our customers to upload their software products directly
onto our systems for downloading by their end-users. Our systems automatically scan our customers' software products for known
computer viruses on an ongoing basis while they are on our systems. However, it is possible that in spite of those periodic virus scans,
our system could transmit the virus to one or more end-users. Any such virus transmission could result in disputes, litigation and
negative publicity that could adversely affect our business and our stock price.

If our security measures are breached and unauthorized access is obtained to a customer's data, our service may be perceived
as not being secure and customers may curtail or stop using our service.

Our service involves the storage and transmission of customers' proprietary information, and security breaches could expose
us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation and possible liability. If our security measures are breached as a result of third-party
action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and, as a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to one of our customers'
data, our reputation will be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to
obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target,
we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of
our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and
customers.

25



---





Additional government regulations may harm demand for our services and increase our costs of doing business.

Our business has benefited from the tax laws of states in which purchases of software licenses are not taxable if the software
is received only electronically. Some such states are considering whether to change their laws to broaden the taxability of transactions
fulfilled over the Internet. Any new imposition of taxes on sales of software licenses, where the software is received electronically, could
substantially harm demand for our services and thereby materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition. We also have benefited from implementing our services in Ireland, which offers tax advantages to software companies
distributing software from Ireland. Any regulatory change in Ireland or elsewhere that diminishes those advantages could harm our
business. Other changes in government regulations, in areas such as privacy and export compliance, could also require us to
implement changes in our services or operations that increase our cost of doing business and thereby hurt our financial
performance.

Claims by third parties for intellectual property infringement could force us to stop selling our services, force us to pay royalties,
and force us to indemnify our customers.

Our business involves a high risk that we will be the target of intellectual property infringement claims. These claims could take
a number of forms, including:

- Claims by other technology companies alleging that current or future components of our digital delivery service or related services
infringe their intellectual property rights;
- Claims by our customers' competitors alleging that our customers' software, which we store and electronically deliver for our
customers, infringes those competitors' intellectual property rights (our customers would typically be required to defend and indemnify
us against such claims, but the claims could nevertheless disrupt our business);
- Claims that our use of the name Intraware violates the rights of other entities that are using the same name. We are aware that
certain other companies are using the name "Intraware" as a company name or as a trademark or service mark. While we have
received no notice of any claims of trademark infringement from any of those companies, we cannot assure you that these companies
may not claim superior rights to "Intraware" or to other marks we use; or
- Claims by our customers that we delivered their software to unauthorized third parties, thereby infringing our customers'
intellectual property rights.

Industry consolidation is increasing the risk that we will become a target of the types of infringement claims described in the first
two bullets above. Consolidation among companies providing digital delivery, licensing, e-commerce and related technologies is
resulting in more direct competition among the surviving companies in that segment, heightening the risk of intellectual property
infringement claims among those companies, including us. Similarly, consolidation in the enterprise software industry heightens the risk
of intellectual property infringement claims among the companies remaining in that industry, including most of our customers.

These intellectual property claims could be made for patent, copyright or trademark infringement or for misappropriation of trade
secrets. They could be made directly against us, or indirectly through our contractual indemnification obligations to our customers and
channel partners. Any claims could result in costly litigation and be time-consuming to defend, divert management's attention and
resources, or cause delays in releasing new or upgrading existing services. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may be
available only on onerous terms, if at all. Although we carry general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover all potential claims
or may not be adequate to protect us from all liability that may be imposed.

We believe we own the rights in, or have the rights required to use, our SubscribeNet technology. However, there can be no
assurance that this technology does not infringe the rights of third parties. In addition, we take steps to verify that end-users who
download our customers' software through our SubscribeNet service are entitled to deploy and use that software. However, there can
be no assurance that this verification procedure will help us defend against claims by, or protect us against liability to, our customers
whose software is downloaded.

If our export compliance system fails to prevent unauthorized exports of our customers' software, we could be sanctioned by
the U.S. government.

Through our SubscribeNet service, we globally distribute software containing encryption technology and other technologies
restricted by U.S. laws and regulations from exportation to certain countries, certain types of recipients, and certain specific end-users.
Our SubscribeNet solution incorporates automated procedures to help ensure that the software we deliver electronically is not
downloaded in violation of U.S. export laws and regulations. However, these procedures may not prevent unauthorized exports of
restricted software in every case. If an unauthorized export of software occurs through the SubscribeNet service and the U.S.
government determines that we have violated U.S. export laws or regulations, we could be sanctioned under those laws or regulations.
Sanctions include fines, suspension or revocation of export privileges, and imprisonment.

26



---





If our key personnel left the company, our product development, sales, and corporate management could suffer.

Our future success depends upon the continued service of our executive officers and other key technology, sales, marketing
and support personnel. None of our officers or key employees is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. If we lost
the services of one or more of our key employees, or if one or more of our executive officers or key employees decided to join a
competitor or otherwise compete directly or indirectly with us, this could significantly harm our business.

Financial and securities laws, especially the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, require that we evaluate our internal control
structure. While we believe we currently have adequate internal controls in place, this exercise has no precedent available by which to
measure the adequacy of our compliance, and in addition it may cause our operating expenses to increase.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and newly proposed or enacted rules and regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock
Market impose new duties on us and our executives, directors, attorneys and independent registered public accounting firms. In order
to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and such new rules and regulations, we are evaluating our internal control over financial
reporting to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our internal control over
financial reporting. We are performing the system and process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required in an
effort to comply with the management certification and independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, we are incurring additional expenses and diversion of management's time, and we
may be required to hire additional personnel and engage additional outside legal, accounting and advisory services. Any of these
developments could materially increase our operating expenses and accordingly reduce our net income or increase our net losses.
While we anticipate being able to fully implement the requirements relating to internal control over financial reporting and all other
aspects of Section 404 in a timely fashion, we cannot be certain as to the outcome of our testing and resulting remediation actions or
the impact of the same on our operations since there is little precedent available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are
unable to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may be subject to sanctions
or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or the Nasdaq Stock Market, and our reputation may be harmed. Any such
action could adversely affect our financial results and the price of our common stock.

Moreover, our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over
our financial reporting will eliminate all risk of error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our disclosure controls or procedures could
be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.

We may raise additional capital to fund acquisitions, product development or general operations. Any such capital financing
would dilute our shareholders' investments.

We may raise additional capital in the future through private or public offerings of stock, or through other means. The purposes
of any such financing would be to increase our cash reserves for potential use in acquiring other businesses, product development
activities, funding our operations and generally strengthening our balance sheet. Any such additional financing would likely dilute the
investments of our current shareholders.

We could face claims in relation to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP").

We have maintained an ESPP program for the benefit of our employees since 1999. We recently determined that
beginning in late 2001, we issued shares that were authorized under our ESPP plan but which exceeded the number of shares we had
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on Form S-8. We currently are in the process of registering additional
ESPP shares with the SEC, but it is possible we could face claims for rescission of past purchases or other damages by former
employees who lost money selling their ESPP shares. It is difficult to predict the overall size of these potential claims because we do
not have data showing the extent to which employees or former employees continue to hold their shares or have sold them, or data
showing any resulting losses. While we believe the aggregate amount of potential claims is small, we cannot assure you of this. We
also believe we have valid defenses against any such claims, including without limitation applicable statutes of limitation, but the cost of
litigating these issues could be expensive and we cannot assure you we would prevail on all of our defenses or avoid rescinding certain
purchases under the ESPP and/or paying damages.

Our sales and marketing services arrangement with Software Spectrum, Inc. terminated on January 3, 2006. As a result, we
stopped recognizing alliance and reimbursement revenues after January 3, 2006.

Until January 3, 2006, we provided sales and marketing services to Software Spectrum to assist in its resale and marketing of
Sun Java Enterprise System and Sun One software licenses and maintenance, under a Sales Alliance Agreement between us and
Software Spectrum. Under that agreement, Software Spectrum shared with us a portion of its gross profit from resales of licenses and
maintenance for that Sun software, and paid us a SubscribeNet service fee for electronic delivery of that Sun software. This agreement
accounted for substantially all of our alliance and reimbursement revenues, a significant portion of our online services and technology
revenues, and more than 10% of our total revenues in our 2006 fiscal year.

27



---





Effective January 3, 2006, we terminated our Sales Alliances Agreement with Software Spectrum. We have signed a two-year
SubscribeNet service agreement with FusionStorm to provide electronic software and license management services for their SunOne
product sales, which we expect will partially offset the decline in our online services and technology revenues. We do not expect to offer
sales and marketing services in the future to other customers as part of the SubscribeNet offering. We ceased recognize any alliance
and reimbursement revenues after January 3, 2006.

If we acquire any companies or technologies in the future, they could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute
stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results.

We may acquire or make investments in complementary companies, services and technologies in the future. We are
considerably smaller now than we were when we made our past acquisitions, and therefore any new acquisitions or investments could
be more disruptive to our organization than in the past. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks, including:

- difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services and personnel;
- diversion of financial and managerial resources from existing operations;
- risk of entering new markets;
- potential write-offs of acquired assets;
- potential loss of key employees;
- inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition or investment costs; and
- delays in customer purchases due to uncertainty.

In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing convertible debt or equity securities, our existing stockholders may be diluted which
could affect the market price of our stock. As a result, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments, our
business and prospects may be seriously harmed.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On June 22, 2006 the Company's Board of Directors approved an Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Rights Agreement
("Rights Agreement") between the Company and Computershare Investor Services, LLC (the "Rights Agent"), which supersedes and
replaces the Company's previous Preferred Stock Rights Agreement dated September 8, 2005. The amended Rights Agreement allows
one of the Company's existing investors, Crosslink Capital, Inc. ("Crosslink"), and its affiliated companies, to acquire up to twenty
percent of the Company's outstanding common stock without creating a triggering event under the Rights Plan. Crosslink is a venture
capital firm located in San Francisco, California, which in the judgment of management and our Board is not acquiring our stock for
purposes of obtaining control of the Company.

In the event Crosslink does acquire more than fifteen percent of our outstanding common shares, one element of our Standstill and
Stock Restriction Agreement ("Standstill Agreement") with Digital River, Inc. ("Digital River") will be affected. In particular, our Standstill
Agreement with Digital River precludes Digital River from acquiring more than fifteen percent of our voting securities. However, the
Standstill Agreement also provides that this restriction will be suspended so long as any other person or entity owns more than fifteen
percent of our voting shares. Accordingly, if Crosslink acquires more than fifteen percent of our voting shares, our Standstill Agreement
with Digital River will be suspended for as long as Crosslink's ownership remains above fifteen percent. Digital River will, however,
remain subject to the provisions in the Rights Agreement, under which the Rights Plan will be triggered if Digital River acquires more
than a fifteen percent ownership in the Company.

28



---





ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits

|Exhibit
Number | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3.1(1)         | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Intraware, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|3.2(1)         | Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Intraware, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|3.3(2)         | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|3.4(3)         | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|3.5(1)         | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|3.6(4)         | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Intraware, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|4.1(5)         | Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Rights Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2006 between Intraware, Inc.
and Computershare Investor Services LLC, including the Certificate of Designation, the form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of
Rights attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively
|31.1           | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act - Peter H. Jackson                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|31.2           | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act - Wendy A. Nieto                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|32.1           | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

_______________

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Intraware's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 (File
No. 000-25249), filed with the SEC on October 5, 2005.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to Intraware's Current Report
on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2001 (File No. 000-25249), filed with the SEC on April 13, 2001.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to Intraware's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 9, 2005 (File No. 000-25249),
filed with the SEC on November 15, 2005.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to Intraware's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 12, 2005 (File No. 000-25249),
filed with the SEC on September 12, 2005.

(5)	Incorporated by reference to Intraware's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 22, 2006 (File No. 000-25249), filed
with the SEC on June 27, 2006.

29



---





SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

| |                
| | ---------------
| | INTRAWARE, INC.

|                       |                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 13, 2006 | By: /s/ WENDY A. NIETO
               
    Wendy A. Nieto
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Intraware, Inc.

30



---