alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0117]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete a 
system of records notice from its existing inventory of record systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
September 27, 2010, unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843 
Pentagon, 1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the Privacy Act Officer, Office of Freedom of 
Information, Washington Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-1155.
    The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete one 
system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject 
to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed 
deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act 
of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of 
a new or altered system report.

    Dated: August 23, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
    WUSU 16

System Name:
    USUHS Home Town News Release Background Data File (February 22, 
1993; 58 FR 10920).

Reason:
    After review of WUSU 16, it has been determined that the system can 
be deleted. The SORN is covered by the services F035 AF AFNEWS A (Army/
Air Force) and NM-05724-1 (Navy, Marine and Coast Guard).

[FR Doc. 2010-21274 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7106]

Greece, concerned that its cultural heritage is in jeopardy from pillage, made a request to the Government of the United States under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention. The request was received on July 2, 2010, by the United States Department of State. It seeks U.S. import restrictions on archaeological and ethnological material from Greece dating to the Neolithic Era through the mid-eighteenth century.

The specific contents of this request are treated as confidential government-to-government information.

                    Information about the Act and U.S. implementation of the 1970 UNESCO Convention can be found at                     *http://exchanges.state.gov/​heritage/​.*                     A public summary of the Greek Request will be posted on the Web site.                

Dated: August 18, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-21287 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
#### Sherrill HARSTON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 17, 1971.

Titus Lyle and Douglas Keen, Keen & Lyle, Scottsville, for appellant.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., George F. Rabe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

STEINFELD, Judge.

Appellant Sherrill Harston was found guilty of uttering forged checks in violation of KRS 434.130(2). He appeals, claiming only that his motions for a directed verdict of acquittal should have been sustained because “(t)he Commonwealth failed to prove the bank upon which the checks were written was authorized by law to do a general banking business.” Such proof was unnecessary. Francis v. Commonwealth, Ky., 468 S.W.2d 287 (1971).

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bill Barrett Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Fredrick J. Barrett, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert W. Howard, as Chief Financial
Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Fredrick J. Barrett             
|Fredrick J. Barrett                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|February 23, 2010                   
|                                    
|/s/ Robert W. Howard                
|Robert W. Howard                    
|Chief Financial Officer             
|February 23, 2010
<PAGE>

                          FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA
                                   LETTERHEAD


March 7, 2000


Mr. William Rasmussen
Transgenomic Inc.
5600 S. 42 St
Omaha, NE 68107

Dear Bill:

First National Bank of Omaha officially waives Transgenomic's non-compliance
with the following covenants as defined in the Loan Agreement September 17,
1997, which has been amended from time to time, effective as of the company's
fiscal year end of December 31, 1999:

1.   Maintain no less than $8,250,000 of Tangible Net Worth;

2.   Maintain a maximum Debt to Tangible Net Worth of not more than 1.2:1.0.

3.   Maintain a minimum Working Capital of $4,250,000.

4.   Restrict the purchase or lease of fixed assets to an amount that does not
     exceed the depreciation taken in the company's fiscal year.

This waiver is based on the draft copy of the Audit showing a Tangible Net Worth
of $6,868,980; Debt to Tangible Net Worth of 1.47:1.0; Working Capital of
$3,493,881; and fixed asset purchases of $1,894,093 and depreciation of
$1,364,246.


Sincerely,


/s/ Mark McMillan
Mark McMillan
Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>  This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information
extracted from the Partnership's  unaudited financial statements for the quarter
ended  December  31, 1999 and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                  5,281
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               4
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,285
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         17,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     244
<BONDS>                                 6,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             11,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           17,345
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       14,106
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        10,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    10,660
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           10,660
<EPS-BASIC>                              5.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                            5.27


</TABLE>
#### OKRIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. KAY and Florida Industrial Commission.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,183
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                23,850
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     46,444
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        137,035
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,112
<DEPOSITS>                                     187,692
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,729
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 223,112
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,971
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,181
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   658
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,810
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,573
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,839
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,971
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      369
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,067
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         710
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       710
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,467
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,524
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      288
<RECOVERIES>                                        41
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,646
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
389 A.2d 195

#### Commonwealth v. Hollenden, Appellant.

Submitted September 12, 1977.

Calvin S. Drayer, Jr., and George B. Ditter, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant;

William T. Nicholas, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 23.1







                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-104319 (Form S-8 for an aggregate 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01
par value pertaining to the Amended and Restated Cosi Stock Incentive Plan and
the Cosi Sandwich Bar, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan) of our report dated
March 18, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
29, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York

March 25, 2004
---

**Exhibit 23.4**

**Consent of Black Mountain Technology**

**In connection with US Geothermal
Inc's registration statement on Form 10-K, S-1, S-8 and related filings under
the United States Securities Act of 1933, I, Susan Petty, on behalf of Black
Mountain Technology ("Black Mountain"), hereby consent to the use of Black
Mountain's name and to the use of the "Empire Geothermal Project Evaluation"
dated August, 2006, as updated March 2008, references to the Project Evaluation,
or portions thereof, or information derived from the Project Evaluation, in the
Registration Statement.**

Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 7 day of June, 2010

|/s/ Susan Petty            | 
|-------------------------- | 
|Name: Susan Petty          | 
|Title: Principal and Owner | 
|                           | 

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ideal Accents, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ideal Accents, Inc., and will be retained by Ideal Accents, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/S/ Karim Suleman__________________

Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer,

President, Director and Chief Financial

Officer



Date:  March 31, 2006
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1577

___________

Bettye Everette, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

St. Vincent Health System, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 19, 2010

Filed: February 24, 2010 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bettye Everette, an African American female, appeals the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment in her Title VII employment discrimination action

against St. Vincent Health System. Reviewing de novo, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453

F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we find no error in the district court’s decision, see

42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1) (charges must be filed within 180 days of the alleged

unlawful employment practice); Klein v. McGowan, 198 F.3d 705, 709 (8th Cir.

1999) (conduct which occurred outside of the statutory period cannot be grounds for

1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.
suit unless it is part of continuing violation which is systematic or serial; for

continuing-violation exception to be available, plaintiff must show sufficient nexus

between time-barred instances of harassment and discrimination that was not timebarred); see also Anda v. Wickes Furniture Co., 517 F.3d 526, 531-32 (8th Cir. 2008)

(listing elements of prima facie case for hostile work environment claim); Carpenter

v. Con-Way Cent. Express, Inc., 481 F.3d 611, 618 (8th Cir. 2007) (“A hostile work

environment ‘is permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that

is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment

and create an abusive working environment’ as viewed objectively by a reasonable

person.” (quoting Tademe v. Saint Cloud State Univ., 328 F.3d 982, 991 (8th Cir.

2003))). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                   123
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         16,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           (269)
<INVENTORY>                                                            3,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      24,809
<PP&E>                                                                11,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        (6,190)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        36,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 20,819
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                  30
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            12,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          36,063
<SALES>                                                               70,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      70,098
<CGS>                                                                 46,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         46,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      23,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     1,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (560)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date and Time: 

Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 10 a.m. 

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Status:

 This meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Items To Be Discussed:

 Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.  Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.  Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.  Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee. 

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                     

Mary W. Dove, 

Secretary of the Commission.

 [FR Doc. E8-24545 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### Rhea *v.*Brinkley.

(No. 25492

Decided October 9, 1935.)

*Messrs. Dolle, O’Donnell & Gash,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Louis B. Sawyer*and *Mr. Joseph Sagmeister,*for defendant in error.

*173It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said 'cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.