alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.46
 WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
2006 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
 FORM OF STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
  Grant




---



##### 



Changes in the Companys Capital Structure
  Exercise of Options
 Requirements of Law
 Termination/Forfeiture
 2




---



##### 



Severance of Employment
 Death
 Retirement
 Disability
 (e)
    
    Forfeiture.(i)
    
    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or this Agreement, if the
Committee finds by a majority vote that the Optionee, before or after the termination
of his/her employment relationship with the Company and all Affiliates (A) committed
fraud, embezzlement, theft, felony or an act of dishonesty in the course of his/her
employment by the Company or an Affiliate which conduct damaged the Company or an
Affiliate or (B) disclosed trade secrets of the Company or an Affiliate, then as of the
date the Committee makes its finding, any portion of the Option that has not been
exercised by the Optionee
 3




---



##### 



will be forfeited to the Company. The findings and decision of the Committee with
respect to such matter, including those regarding the acts of the Optionee and the
damage done to the Company, will be final for all purposes.
 (ii)
    
    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or this Agreement, if the
Committee finds by a majority vote that the Optionee, before or after the termination
of his/her employment relationship with the Company and all Affiliates (A) violated any
material policies of the Company and its Affiliates, (B) breached any noncompetition,
confidentiality, or other restrictive covenants applicable to the Optionee, or (C)
engaged in other conduct that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the
Company and its Affiliates, then as of the date the Committee makes its finding, any
portion of the Option that has not been exercised by the Optionee will be forfeited to
the Company. The findings and decision of the Committee with respect to such matter,
including those regarding the acts of the Optionee and the damage done to the Company,
will be final for all purposes.
 Amendment
 No Rights as a Shareholder
 Governing Law
 Notices
 Employment Obligation
 4




---



##### 



Taxes and Governmental Charges
 Binding Effect
 Termination of Plan; Discretionary Grant
 Data Privacy
 5




---



##### 



. Assignability; Successors and Assigns.
 Counterparts
 6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.By:Name:Title:Optionee:OptioneeSocial Security No.
 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         768152                 
<NAME>                        Triton Acquisition Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5451
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       159000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5451)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Jimmy Ollie JENKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45396.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1973.

*131Melvyn Carson Bruder, Dallas (Court appointed on appeal), for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., and Robert T. Baskett, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Hut-tash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is sodomy; the punishment, ten (10) years.

Appellant’s first ground of error relates to proof of his four prior convictions. Two were used to impeach him, on cross-examination, at the guilt or innocence phase and all four were introduced at the punishment phase. He claims that three of the convictions are void because they do not indicate that appellant was represented by counsel or that he waived counsel at those prior proceedings and that the fourth conviction is void under Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 89 S.Ct. 1243, 22 L.Ed.2d 542. An examination of the record reveals that appellant did not interpose an objection to the use or introduction of the prior convictions. Logan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 482 S.W.2d 229; Nicholson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 773; Chaney v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 464 S.W.2d 653. Further, in regard to the contention concerning lack of counsel we observe that appellant offered no proof that he was indigent at the time of those prior convictions or that he had not waived the right to counsel. Green v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 212; Vera v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 473 S.W.2d 22; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 470 S.W.2d 663.

Appellant’s first ground of error is overruled.

Appellant’s second ground of error relates to certain argument to which there was no objection. Nothing is presented for review. Sutton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 419 S.W.2d 857.

Appellant’s second ground of error, is overruled.

Appellant’s last ground of error relates to a comment made by the trial court while ruling on an objection. No objection was made to the comment of the Court, hence the Court had no opportunity to instruct the jury not to consider his comment. Nothing is presented for review. Sutton v. State, supra.

Appellant’s last ground of error is overruled.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1578
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               87
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1578
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    23
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (17)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (17)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael W. Zellner hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                         
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael W. Zellner                                                  
|                   |  |     |  | Michael W. Zellner                                                      
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso, undersigned Chief Financial  Officer and Investor Relations Officer of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – SABESP (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained  in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|              |                                                              |        |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  | July 10, 2008                                           |   |
|         |
| By:     | /s/ Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso                |   |
|         |                                                         |   |
| Name:   | Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso                    |   |
| Title:  | Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer  |   |
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report ofCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – Sabesp (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Dilma Seli Pena, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: April 25, 2014

By:      /s/ Dilma Seli Pena

Name:    Dilma SeliPena

Title:     Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated December 26, 2007, accompanyingthe financial statements of Ciprico Inc. which is included in their AnnualReport (which report expensed an unqualified opinion and contains anexplanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial AccountingStandards Board Statement No. 123(R), *Shares Based Payments,*effective October 1, 2006) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30,2007.  We hereby consent to the inclusionof said report in the Registration Statement of Ciprico Inc. on Forms S-8 (FileNo. 33-64999, File No. 33-65001, File No. 333-02931, File No. 333-02933,File No. 333-42841, File No. 333-42843, File No. 333-42845 andFile No. 333-61018).

 

Minneapolis,Minnesota

December 26,2007

 

 

----
#### Beatrice MARTIN, Appellant, v. Arthur Lee MARTIN, Jr., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 2, 1973.

James S. Carroll, Julian W. Knippenberg, Carroll & Knippenberg, Lexington, for appellant.

Jack L. Miller, Lexington, for appellee.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner ROY N. VANCE,

Reversing.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael D. Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum
Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and
belief that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.


February 26, 2006                          /s/  MICHAEL D. PRICE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           By: Michael D. Price
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02697-BNB

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOUNTAIN STATES LINE CONSTRUCTORS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND

TRAINING COMMITTEE,

Defendant.

ORDER ASSIGNING CASE

On completion of the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, tit

appears that this case is not appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, this case is

being assigned to District Judge Robert E. Blackburn, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR

40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Kathleen M. Tafoya. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2D. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to District Judge Robert E.

Blackburn, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Kathleen

M. Tafoya.

DATED November 1, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02697-REB-KMT Document 4 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 10, 2009*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.223 Trade Credit** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00843

- CR

Charles B. HARRIS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 0559

- CR

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED March 19, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
2014-05-15 Exhibit - Equipment Schedule No. 1



















	
			
	Lessor:
	 
	Lessee:

	FIRST NATIONAL CAPITAL, LLC
	 
	MILLER ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., AND

	 
	 
	ALL AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES

	 
	 
	 

	By: /s/ Keith Duggan
	 
	By: /s/ Scott M. Boruff

	Name: Keith Duggan
	 
	Name: Scott M. Boruff

	Title: Manager
	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1


              Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                              Section  906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



  I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
  CVD Equipment Corporation certify that:

  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CVD Equipment
       Corporation (the "Registrant");

  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
       statement of  a material fact or omit to state a material fact
       necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
       under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
       the period covered by this quarterly report; and

  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
       cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
       this quarterly report.




  Dated: August 14, 2003

     /s/ Leonard A. Rosenbaum
  ----------------------------------------
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director






  EXHIBIT 99.2


              Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                              Section  906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



  I, Sharon Canese, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of CVD Equipment
  Corporation certify that:

  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CVD Equipment
       Corporation (the "Registrant");

  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
  statement of  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
  this quarterly report; and

  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
  quarterly report.




  Dated: August 14, 2003

     /s/ Sharon Canese
  ----------------------------------------
  Chief  Financial Officer and Secretary
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation (HickoryTech) on Form 10-Q/A forthe period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Christensen, ChiefFinancial Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ David A.  Christensen |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| David A.  Christensen     |
| Chief  Financial Officer  |
| March 3,  2004            |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6394

HARRY PHILLIP GROSS, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD F. MOATS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98-

3802-L)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Phillip Gross, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,

Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry Phillip Gross, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Gross v. Moats, No. CA-98-3802-L (D. Md. Feb.

1 & 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Karma Media, Inc. ("Karma Media") on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dominique Einhorn, President and Chief Executive Officer of Karma Media, and I,
Gerard Keenan, Principal Financial Officer of Karma Media, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Karma Media

Date:
March 31, 2005

/s/ Dominique Einhorn

Dominique Einhorn

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:
March 31, 2005

/s/Gerard
Keenan

Gerard
Keenan

Principal Financial Officer