alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rurban Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Duane L. Sinn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Duane L. Sinn  *     Print Name: Duane L. Sinn
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEFFREY MONTGOMERY.

September 17, 1985.

Petition for certification denied.
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60409 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY EARL HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STEVE PUCKETT; ROGER COOK; THOMAS WILKERSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-374-PG

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM: ** Johnny Earl Hall, Mississippi inmate #30722, appeals from the judgment on a jury verdict and from the denial of his F ED . R. C IV . P. 59(a) motion in this civil rights suit. Hall lists five issues for review. Although we liberally construe Hall’s pro se brief, he fails to present this court with argument on any issue. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a)(9); Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524-No. 97-60409 -2- 25 (5th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, we DISMISS his appeal for failure to prosecute. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.3.3, 42.3.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         357,290
<SECURITIES>                                   541,017
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                       845
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,046,825
<PP&E>                                         178,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,468,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          689,207
<BONDS>                                         11,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           310
<OTHER-SE>                                     767,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,468,456
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,064,324
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  894,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (93)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (513)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,854
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,979
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
        

</TABLE>
#### Lawrence Murray FORD, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 22, 1971.

M. Ronald Christopher, Hurt & Christopher, Murray, Chappell R. Wilson, Cadiz, for appellant.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., David E. Murrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

EDWARD P. HILL, Jr., Judge.

The appeal is from an order dismissing appellant’s appeal from the Christian County Court to the Christian Circuit Court. Appellant argues in his brief that he was under the impression his case had been reassigned for trial March 3, 1971, when by order of the circuit court his case had been reassigned for March 2, 1971.

 There is nothing in this record to show why appellant was not apprised of the date of the trial. Under RCr 12.06, the circuit court had the power to either dismiss the appeal or direct a jury to find appellant guilty for failure to appear and make a defense. Neither does the record show a motion to set aside the order nor does it contain an affidavit showing appellant’s excuse for not appearing. Some of these matters are argued in appellant’s brief, but we cannot consider matters stated in briefs unsupported by the record. Lawson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 403 S.W. 2d 281 (1966).

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BLUEGATE CORPORATION PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C.
      63.





I,
      Charles E. Leibold, the Chief Financial Officer of Bluegate Corporation, hereby
      certify that Bluegate Corporation's periodic report on Form 10-QSB, for the
      period ending September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
      information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
      of
      Bluegate Corporation.








Date:
              November 3, 2006
            /s/
              Charles E. LeiboldCharles
                E. Leibold, CPAChief
                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,331
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,947
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,554
<LOANS>                                         93,492
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,715
<DEPOSITS>                                     136,560
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,247
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                618
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 156,715
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,056
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  771
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   426
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,253
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,012
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,016
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,237
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    659
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         659
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.28
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,239
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,216
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,508
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      131
<RECOVERIES>                                        30
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,522
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1893

___________________________ Corey Spector lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Accredited Home Loans, Inc.; Select Portfolio Services; Millsap & Singer, P.C., as Trustee; U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee for the holders of the Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-3 Asset Backed Notes lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: February 26, 2021 Filed: March 2, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Corey Spector appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his action. He argues

on appeal that the district court erred in dismissing his wrongful foreclosure claim, and erred by not granting him leave to amend his complaint. Upon careful de novo review, see Ballinger v. Culotta, 322 F.3d 546, 548 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review), we affirm. We find that Spector’s wrongful foreclosure claim was barred by res judicata, as he previously litigated the same claim in state court, and the same parties or their privies were involved in the state court proceedings. See Brown v. Kan. City Live, LLC, 931 F.3d 712, 714 (8th Cir. 2019) (elements of res judicata under Missouri law); Kesterson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 242 S.W.3d 712, 716 (Mo. 2008) (en banc) (where evidentiary details needed to prove claims were different, but crux of inquiry was same, res judicata applied); Meadowfresh Sols. USA, LLC v. Maple Grove Farms, LLC, 606 S.W.3d 193, 205 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020) (assignee was in privity with assignor); Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 539 S.W.3d 879, 901 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017) (attorney appointed by bank for foreclosure was in privity with bank). We also find that the district court did not err in failing to grant Spector leave to amend his complaint. See Clayton v. White Hall Sch. Dist., 778 F.2d 457, 460 (8th Cir. 1985) (no abuse of discretion in failing to grant leave to amend where appellant merely concluded response to motion to dismiss with request for leave to amend, and did not offer proposed complaint or even substance of proposed amendment to court). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD COVERT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2849

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Philippe Matthey, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Christopher E. Cosden, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 502

_____________________________
J AMALL J. M ATTHEWS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Kelvin C. Wells , Judge

. September 22, 2020

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , C.J.
, and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jovona I. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2018

a0924 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2018

156796

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156796

COA: 332966

Wayne CC: 15

- 009334

- FC

JEFFREY ALEXANDER HOGAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund V (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by
the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson             
|                      |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner
|                      |  | Rancon Realty Fund V
Presidential Documents

60935 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 200 

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2009–1 of October 3, 2008 

Unexpected Urgent Humanitarian Needs Related to Pakistan, 

Afghanistan, and Georgia 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

October 3, 2008 

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 

United States, including sections 2 and 4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 

Assistance Act of 1962 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended, (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 2603) 

and section 301 of title 3, United States Code: 

(1) I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is 

important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, in 

an amount not to exceed $8.3 million from the United States Emergency 

Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs in Pakistan and Afghanistan 

resulting from intensified armed conflict and flooding, and in Georgia due 

to recent violence, including by contributions to international, governmental, 

and nongovernmental organizations, and payment of administrative expenses 

of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department 

of State; and 

(2) The functions of the President in relation to this memorandum under 

section 2(d) of the Act, and of establishing terms and conditions under 

section 2(c)(1) of the Act, are assigned to you, and you may further assign 

such functions to your subordinates, consistent with applicable law. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
60936 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 15, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 3, 2008 

[FR Doc. E8–24588 

Filed 10–14–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 47105–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.117 Life Insurance Companies** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.15
















CONSENT OF CLÉMENT DOMBROWSKI







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Clément Dombrowski, staff member of Anglo American Exploration (Canada) Ltd., participated in the preparation of the technical report entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, 2013 Exploration Program, Payne Bay Property, Québec, Anglo American Exploration (Canada) Ltd. – Virginia Mines Inc.” completed in March 2014 (the “Report”), concerning mineralized material in the Payne Bay property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.5.4 Geological Setting; 3.5.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.5.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,














				
	 
	/S/

Clément Dombrowski

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

Clément Dombrowski

M.Sc.A, P.Geo., Senior Geologist

	 
	 












May 15, 2014
Exhibit 11


                            WORTHINGTON FOODS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>

                                            Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                           9/27/96      9/29/95      9/27/96      9/29/95
Primary:                                   -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>       
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                      6,371,992    6,330,392    6,367,489    6,321,067

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options based on treasury
  stock method using average
  market price                              288,410      210,438      253,119      158,247
                                         ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------

Weighted average common and
  common equivalent shares                6,660,402    6,540,830    6,620,608    6,479,314
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income                               $1,913,000   $1,327,000   $5,191,000   $3,748,000
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income per common share              $     0.29   $     0.20   $     0.78   $     0.58
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========





Fully Diluted:

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                      6,371,992    6,330,392    6,367,489    6,321,067

Net effect of dilutive stock options
  based on treasury stock method using
  market price at end of period if
  greater than the average market
  price during the period                   316,565      210,438      318,632      202,736
                                         ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------

Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares                       6,688,557    6,540,830    6,686,121    6,523,803
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income                               $1,913,000   $1,327,000   $5,191,000   $3,748,000
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income per common share              $     0.28   $     0.20   $     0.78   $     0.58
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========


</TABLE>



Note: 1995 share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the five-for-four share
split in December, 1995.


                                    - 14 -
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-40769

Summary Calendar

_______________________

RONALD T. CALDWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROY L. BRACKENS, ET AL,

Defendants,

ROY L. BRACKENS, Correctional Officer, Michael Unit; TIM R.

HUFFMAN, Correctional Officer, Michael Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:96-CV-581)

_________________________________________________________________

July 13, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant alleges that his injuries from an

altercation with prison guards were more than de minimis and that
2

he has therefore stated a claim for unconstitutional use of

excessive force. We disagree.

A few bruises and 1-cm. scratch are not injuries of

constitutional dimension. Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191 (5th

Cir. 1997). The magistrate judge correctly dismissed Caldwell’s

claim as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

AFFIRMED.
No. 72-6095.

#### Holland *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.