alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                             [TRAMMELL CROW LOGO]

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.8.4

10/19/1999


Clear Commerce
Sophie Tschosik
Fax # 512-832-8901




Sophie,

Per our conversation from this morning; I have broken down your rent roll for
you. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me and I
will forward you to the right contact.

As of October 1, 1999 your rent roll will be:   Base Rent..............23,296.50
                                                Insurance.................194.11
                                                Mgmt Fees...............1,171.38
                                                Operating Expenses......1,535.91
                                                Property Tax............3,084.98


                                                Total..................29,282.88

Also, just as another reminder that your outstanding amount for October is
4,176.54. Please remit this payment as soon as possible.




Thank You,

/s/ JOANN TENEYUEA                      On Our Way to
                                    One Million Merchants
JoAnn Teneyuca
Associate Accountant
Trammell Crow Company                   THIS IS RENT FOR
512-320-5599                          ALL 3 SUITES COMBINED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11108 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHRISTOPHER STEVEN GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-30-1

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Christopher Steven Gonzales pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of an unregistered firearm, one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appeals the district court’s ruling denying his motion to suppress statements made during a post-arrest interview. He argues that the waiver of his Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 (1966), rights was involuntary because it was the result of promises made by the Government. Gonzales does not renew his suppression theory thatNo. 05-11108 -2- the waiver of his Miranda rights was involuntary due to medication received at the hospital. He further does not challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the raid upon his residence. Accordingly, these issues are abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because the issue whether promises were made by the Government was reached during the suppression hearing, we review the district court’s suppression ruling for clear error in a light most favorable to the Government. See United States v. Maldonado , 42 F.3d 906, 910 (5th Cir. 1995). The record reflects that investigating agents informed Gonzales of the severity of his offense, of the ability to obtain assistance from case agents, and of the potential for transmittal of his cooperation to the United States Attorney. These actions alone did not cause an involuntary waiver of Gonzales’s Miranda rights, and he fails to provide any other evidence that his statements were the result of coercive promises. See United States v. Ballard , 586 F.2d 1060, 1063 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Frazier , 434 F.2d 994, 995-96 (5th Cir. 1970). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Cash Plus I
Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,860,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,777<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,950,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,857,219<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,950,250
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,296,826<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               704,538<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,123,898)<F2>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,716,186<F6>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables included in "other assets" on the Balance Sheet.
<F2>The Partnership's properties were sold on January 30, 1998 to unaffiliated
third parties.  The total selling price of the fourteen properties sold was
$138,000,000, of which the Partnership received $31,247,100, less closing costs
of $1,061,415.  For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership realized a
gain of $2,930,843 on the sale.  Additionally, on April 29, 1998, the General
Partners sold the Partnership's MBS portfolio for $3,583,068.  For financial
reporting purposes, the Partnership recognized a gain of $186,092 on the sale.
<F3>Deficit of the General Partners of ($283,658) and equity of Limited Partners of
$7,140,877.
<F4>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F5>Includes all expenses of the Partnership.
<F6>Net income allocated $11,845 to the General Partners and $3,704,341 to the
Limited Partners.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 33.1 

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA**

**PURSUANT TO ITEM 1122 OF REGULATION AB**

**FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA**

Date: May 1, 2018 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized representative of First National Bank of Omaha (the “Servicer”), hereby certifies as follows: 

(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in 17 C.F.R. § 229.1122(d)(“Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB”), except for servicing criteria specified in (1)(iii); (2)(iii) and (vi); 3(iii) and (iv); and 4(x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii) of Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, which the Servicer has determined areinapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the credit card asset backed securities transactions issued by First National Master Note Trust (the “Platform”) being serviced (such applicable criteria, after giving effect tothe exceptions identified above, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 relating to the servicing of the Platform; 

(2) The Servicer used the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria; 

(3) The Servicer is in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria relating to the Platform as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2017 in all material respects; and 

(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accountingfirm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. 

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA,

asServicer
By 
/s/ Timothy D. Hart
 
Timothy D. Hart

Senior VicePresident

[Signature page to Report on Assessment of Compliance of First National Bank of Omaha]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 for Hallwood Energy Partners,  L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768172
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         7,499
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,812
<PP&E>                                         608,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                 520,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,337
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     62,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,093
<SALES>                                        35,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,292
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .99
        


</TABLE>
#### Willie Ray HINES and Ronald Hines, Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 9, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1974.

Douglas E. Robertson, Allender & Robertson, Bowling Green, for appellants.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., John M. Famularo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court; Robert M. Coleman, Judge.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by Commissioner GARDNER, Affirming.*

*

 Opinion ordered not to be published.
- Complete file          PDF (497 KB)     Summary statistics and table of contents 
       
   PDF (91 KB)
   | 
  CSV (10 KB)     Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables 
       
  PDF (13 KB)
   | 
  CSV (7 KB)    Flows tables 
       
  PDF (197 KB)
   | 
  CSV (134 KB)    Level tables 
       
  PDF (153 KB)
   | 
  CSV (115 KB)    Balance sheet tables 
       
  PDF(25 KB)
   | 
  CSV (14 KB)    Supplementary tables 
       
  PDF (37 KB)
   | 
  CSV (24 KB)    These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02711-CMA-MEH

IN RE THE APPLICATION OF:

JAVIER ORTEGA PONCE,

Petitioner,

v.

S. BRENDA SANCHEZ,

Respondent;

and concerning

THE MINOR CHILD JOSE ANTONIO ORTEGA SANCHEZ,

 DOB 7/21/04.

ORDER REGARDING APPLICATION FOR RETURN OF

THE MINOR CHILDREN TO PETITIONER

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Application for Return of the Minor

Children to Petitioner (Doc. # 1). The Court, having fully reviewed the file in this matter,

including the Declaration of Petitioner (Doc. # 2) and the Affidavit/Return of Service

(Doc. # 3) verifying proper notification to Respondent S. Brenda Sanchez, hereby

ORDERS that counsel for the parties, or the parties, are DIRECTED to call

Chambers (303-335-2174) via conference call no later than noon, November 2, 2011

in order to schedule a hearing on the Petition.

DATED: October 27 , 2011 

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02711-CMA Document 4 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2009*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.3 Credit Market Borrowing by Financial Sectors** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                           
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                             844
<SECURITIES>                                   308,144
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,512,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,683
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,186,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          437,948
<BONDS>                                     12,512,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       184,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,186,849
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,592
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                       480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00389-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. SANDRA RUTH PACHECO-NEVARES,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES AND DEADLINES

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter has been scheduled for a three-day jury trial on the docket of Judge

Philip A. Brimmer in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A701, 7th Floor, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on December 15, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. It is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by November 14, 2011 and

responses to these motions shall be filed by November 21, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall

be made no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any

challenges to such experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is

further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made

one week after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such

experts shall be made no later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is

further

Case 1:11-cr-00389-PAB Document 11 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is set for December 9, 2011 at

9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A701. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in

person. 

The parties shall be prepared to address the following issues at the Trial

Preparation Conference:

1) jury selection;

2) sequestration of witnesses;

3) timing of presentation of witnesses and evidence;

4) anticipated evidentiary issues;

5) any stipulations as to fact or law; and

6) any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial. 

DATED October 19, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00389-PAB Document 11 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
*District Judge of the Northern District of California,

sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

 No. 95-30627

_______________

ROOSEVELT EFFERSON, Individually and

on behalf of Roosevelt Efferson III,

ANITA EFFERSON, Individually and on 

behalf of Roosevelt Efferson III,

DIANE FARRIS, Individually and on

behalf of Ramsey Farris, JOANN

RICHMOND, Individually and on behalf

of Antonio Richmond,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

SCHOOL BOARD OF CADDO PARISH, TERRY L.

TERRIL, ROSALIE EWING, MAXINE YOUNG,

AL LINDSEY, SOPHIA JONES, GLADYS K.

RHINEHART, CHARLES BURLISON,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(94-CV-1787)

____________________________

January 4, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and DUHE’, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER*,

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

 Plaintiffs seek to bypass the administrative process provided
by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, urging that the

relief they seek is not available within the meaning of 20 U.S.C.

Sec. 1415(b) (1) (E). The district court granted the school 

board’s Rule 12 motion to dismiss. We affirm.

 Plaintiffs sued on behalf of themselves and a class of other

students. The complaint was filed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and

other federal statutes seeking money damages and other equitable

relief, together with counsel fees. Some of the plaintiffs are

presently enrolled in the special education program. Attorney

fees are recoverable only under IDEA.

 We find nothing in this record to fault the decision of the

district court to dismiss the claims for failure to exhaust.

AFFIRMED.
#### Beach, Recr., *v.*Mizner, Exr. 

(No. 25747

Decided January 15, 1936.)

*Mr. Allison M. Gibbons,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. G. M. White,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 52309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21081]



[[Page 52309]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XY40


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Tule Chinook Workgroup 
Meeting

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
Tule Chinook Workgroup (TCW) will hold a meeting to discuss issues and 
make assignments relative to developing an abundance-based harvest 
management approach for Columbia River natural tule chinook . This 
meeting of the TCW is open to the public.

DATES:  The meeting will be held Thursday, September 30, 2010, from 9 
a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Pacific Council Office, 
Large Conference Room, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, 
OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Chuck Tracy, Salmon Management Staff 
Officer, Pacific Fishery Management Council, telephone: 503-820-2280.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This first meeting of the TCW will be 
primarily an organizational meeting. Eventually, TCW work products will 
be reviewed by the Council, and if approved, would be submitted to NMFS 
for possible consideration in the next Lower Columbia River tule 
biological opinion for ocean salmon seasons in 2012 and beyond, and 
distributed to State and Federal recovery planning processes. In the 
event a usable approach emerges from this process, the Council may 
consider an FMP amendment process beginning after November 2011 to 
adopt the approach as a formal conservation objective in the Salmon 
FMP.
    Although nonemergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may come before the TCW for discussion, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal action during these meetings. Action will be 
restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any 
issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency 
action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified 
of the intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Ms. Carolyn Porter at 503-820-2280 
at least five days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 20, 2010.
William D. Chappell,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21081 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Hycor Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos. 33-25427, 33-25429,
33-32767, 33-43280, 33-63798, 33-63800, 333-45110 of our report dated February
16, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hycor Biomedical Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2000.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Costa Mesa, California
March 28, 2001