alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2464

In Re: PRISCILLA HINES,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CA-99-626-5-BO)

Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Priscilla Hines, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Priscilla Hines filed this mandamus petition challenging the

district court’s remand of her action alleging error in the amount

of her social security retirement checks. Because this petition

seeks the identical relief sought in an earlier petition filed by

Hines, which was denied by this court, and because Hines presents

no reason to question the propriety of that decision, we deny

mandamus relief. See In re: Hines, No. 00-1924 (4th Cir. Nov. 28,

2000) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument, because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BPO Management Services,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.  
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  November
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/Patrick A.
      DolanPatrick
      A. DolanChief Executive Officer
  Dated:  November
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/Ronald K.
      HerbertRonald
      K. HerbertChief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
----

**Exhibit 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

|                                       | **Jurisdiction of**       | **Percentage of** |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------|
|                                       | **Incorporation or**      | **Ownership**     |
| **Name of Subsidiary**                     | **Organization**          |              |
|                                       |                      |              |
| Home System Group    International         | British    Virgin Islands | 100%              |
|                                       |                      |              |
| Holy (HK) Limited                          | Hong    Kong              | 100%              |
|                                       |                      |              |
| Oceanic International    (Hong Kong), Ltd. | Hong    Kong              | 100%              |
|                                       |                      |              |
| Oceanic Well Profit,    Inc.               | China                     | 100%              |

 

 

 

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2120 

To expand the prohibition on the manufacture, distribution, and importation 

of children’s products that contain phthalates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2014 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To expand the prohibition on the manufacture, distribution, 

and importation of children’s products that contain 

phthalates, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF PROHIBITION ON MANUFAC4 TURE, DISTRIBUTION, AND IMPORTATION OF 

5 CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS CONTAINING 

6 PHTHALATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 108 of the Consumer 

8 Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 

9 110–314; 15 U.S.C. 2057c) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2120 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘children’s toy or child 

2 care article’’ and inserting ‘‘children’s product’’; 

3 and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘or benzyl butyl phthalate 

5 (BBP)’’ and inserting ‘‘benzyl butyl phthalate 

6 (BBP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl 

7 phthalate (DIDP), or di-n-octyl phthalate 

8 (DnOP)’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) by striking paragraph (1); 

11 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and 

12 (3) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and 

13 (C) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by 

14 subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘a final rule’’ 

15 and all that follows through ‘‘evaluate the find16 ings’’ and inserting ‘‘a final rule to evaluate the 

17 findings’’. 

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is 

19 further amended— 

20 (1) in subsection (c)— 

21 (A) by striking ‘‘subsections (a) and (b)(1) 

22 and any rule promulgated under subsection 

23 (b)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a) and any 

24 rule promulgated under subsection (b)(2)’’; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2120 IS

1 (B) by striking ‘‘children’s toy or child 

2 care article’’ each place it appears and inserting 

3 ‘‘children’s product’’; 

4 (2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘children’s 

5 toy or child care article’’ and inserting ‘‘children’s 

6 product’’; 

7 (3) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘subsection 

8 (a) or (b)(1) or any rule promulgated by the Com9 mission under subsection (b)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub10 section (a) or any rule promulgated by the Commis11 sion under subsection (b)(2)’’; 

12 (4) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘subsections 

13 (a) and (b)(1) and any rule promulgated under sub14 section (b)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a) and 

15 any rule promulgated under subsection (b)(2)’’; and 

16 (5) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the 

17 following: 

18 ‘‘(E) The term ‘children’s product’ has the 

19 meaning given such term in section 3(a) of the 

20 Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 

21 2052(a)).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>       SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                  31,202,848 
<SECURITIES>                  0    
<RECEIVABLES>            3,409,890 
<ALLOWANCES>                  0    
<INVENTORY>                   0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>        34,612,738 
<PP&E>                 145,908,327 
<DEPRECIATION>          44,702,207 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>         148,459,707 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    3,002,812 
<BONDS>                 63,749,736 
<COMMON>                      0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0    
<PREFERRED>                   0    
<OTHER-SE>              64,460,536 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>148,459,707 
<SALES>                 21,949,421 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>        22,817,386 
<CGS>                         0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>           13,955,975 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>           604,259 
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>       6,150,810 
<INCOME-PRETAX>          2,106,342 
<INCOME-TAX>                  0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>      1,761,718 
<DISCONTINUED>           3,001,373 
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0    
<CHANGES>                     0    
<NET-INCOME>             4,763,091 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                24.58 
<EPS-DILUTED>                24.58 

        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Fidelity  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  we,  Richard G.
Spencer, Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa L. Griffith, Chief Financial Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Richard G. Spencer                               /s/ Lisa L. Griffith
--------------------------------                     ---------------------------
Richard G. Spencer                                   Lisa L. Griffith
Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer




February 17, 2004
ex10-44.htm


EXHIBIT 10.44


 



PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 



	 
$543,300.01

	April 30, 2014





 


For value received, Guardian 8 Holdings, a Nevada corporation (the “Maker”) promised to pay to C. Stephen Cochennet, or its registered assigns or successors in interest (the “Holder”) the Principal Amount and Interest (both as defined below) in the manner and upon the terms and conditions as set forth in that Term Note (“Note”) in the sum of Five Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and One Cent ($543,300.01), dated September 1, 2013, which Note becomes due and payable on or about April 30, 2014.







By execution by the parties herein, this Promissory Note Extension Agreement extends the Maturity Date of the Note to and including July 15, 2014. All terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same other than the Maturity Date.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Holder have caused this Promissory Note Extension Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.







“Maker”


Guardian 8 Holdings


a Nevada corporation

















By: /s/ Kathleen Hanrahan                                                               


                                                                       Kathleen Hanrahan, Chief Financial Officer







“Holder”




 







/s/ C. Stephen Cochennet                                                                


C. Stephen Cochennet
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                                   NOTE GUARANTEE

          Each Guarantor, as defined in the Indenture (the "INDENTURE"),
(referred to in the Note upon which this notation is endorsed), (i) has
jointly and severally unconditionally guaranteed (a) the due and punctual
payment of the principal of, premium and interest and Liquidated Damages, if
any, on the Notes, whether at maturity or an interest payment date, by
acceleration, call for redemption or otherwise, (b) the due and punctual
payment of interest on the overdue principal and premium of, and interest and
Liquidated Damages, if any, on the Notes, and (c) in case of any extension of
time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such other obligations, the
same shall be promptly paid in full when due in accordance with the terms of
the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or
otherwise and (ii) has agreed to pay any and all costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees) incurred by the Trustee or any Holder
in enforcing any rights under this Note Guarantee.

          Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the Note Guarantor
would constitute or result in a violation of any applicable fraudulent
conveyance or similar law of any relevant jurisdiction, the liability of such
Guarantor under its Note Guarantee shall be reduced to the maximum amount
permissible under such fraudulent conveyance or similar law.

          No past, present or future director, officer, employee, agent,
incorporator, stockholder or agent of any Guarantor, as such, shall have any
liability for any obligations of the Company or any Guarantor under the
Notes, any Note Guarantee, Indenture, any supplemental Indenture delivered
pursuant to the Indenture by such Guarantor or any Note Guarantees, or for
any claim based on, in respect of or by reason of such obligations or their
creation.  Each Holder by accepting a Note waives and releases all such
liability.

          This Note Guarantee shall be binding upon each Guarantor and its
successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and
assigns of the Trustee and Holders and, in the event of any transfer or
assignment of rights by the Holder or the Trustee, the rights and privileges
herein conferred upon that party shall automatically extend to and be vested
in such transferee or assignee, all subject to the terms and conditions
hereof.

          This Note Guarantee shall not be valid or obligatory for any
purpose until the certificate of authentication on the Note upon which this
Note Guarantee is noted have been executed by the Trustee under the Indenture
by the manual signature of one of its authorized officers.  Capitalized terms
used herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Indenture.

                              UIBIQUITEL INC.


                              By:
                                 --------------------------------------
                              Name:     Peter Lucas
                              Title:    Interim Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 207

To restrict the sale, lease, transfer, retransfer, or delivery of F-16 
 aircraft, M1 tanks, or certain other defense articles or services to 
                        the Government of Egypt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2013

   Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Mr. Lee, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Johanns, and Mr. 
    Coburn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restrict the sale, lease, transfer, retransfer, or delivery of F-16 
 aircraft, M1 tanks, or certain other defense articles or services to 
                        the Government of Egypt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN MILITARY SALES TO EGYPT.

    The United States Government may not allow the sale, lease, 
transfer, retransfer, or delivery of F-16 aircraft, M1 tanks, or 
certain other defense articles or services to the Government of Egypt 
until the President certifies to Congress that the Government of Egypt 
has agreed--
            (1) to continue to uphold its commitments under the Camp 
        David Peace Accords;
            (2) to provide proper security at United States embassies 
        and consulates pursuant to the Vienna Convention on Consular 
        Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963; and
            (3) to bring stability to Egypt by ending its systematic 
        exclusion and silencing of all official minority political 
        opposition and taking concrete steps to engage in dialogue with 
        such opposition parties and consider a coalition, power-sharing 
        government with such opposition parties.
                                 <all>
```
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 16, 2011*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.202 U.S. Deposits in Foreign Countries** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### William C. BUTCHER, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 19, 1971.

Kenneth H. Smee, Lexington, for appellant.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., Mark F.' Armstrong, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

OSBORNE, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order overruling appellant’s application for relief under RCr 11.42.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery on April 28, 1964. He now contends that the trial court did not advise him of his right to appeal as required by RCr 11.02(2). This section of the Rules of Criminal Procedure has no retroactive effect and there was no comparable rule in effect in this jurisdiction at the time of appellant’s conviction. RCr 11.02(2) is an adaptation of the Federal Criminal Rule 32(a). The federal courts have not given retroactive effect to that rule. See Carr v. United States, 28 F.Supp. 236 (D.C., Ky., 1939).

Appellant further contends that his in-court identification was tainted by a prior identification made in a lineup, and that he was not represented by counsel at the line*115up. The cases upon which he relies are not effective retroactively. See Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. *1926,*18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); Bradley v. Commonwealth, Ky., 439 S.W.2d 61 (1969).

We are of the opinion that appellant’s in-court identification raised only an evidentiary and not a constitutional issue. Since he did not object at the time of the trial, his rights are now waived. See Yates v. Commonwealth, Ky., 375 S.W.2d 271 (1964).

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, October 16, 2008 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (6), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (6), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

                    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.                           ( print page 61177)    

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, October 16, 2008 will be: 

Formal orders of investigation; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature;

Adjudicatory matters; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: October 9, 2008. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-24443 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.D.F., A MINOR

PETITION OF: B.G., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 256 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.D.F., A MINOR

PETITION OF: B.G., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 257 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of July, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
f8k051514ex10i_minnshares.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 



Minn Shares Inc.


1624 Harmon Place, Suite 210


Minneapolis, MN 55403







May 15, 2014







The Globe Resources Group, LLC


8301 E 21st Street N, #420


Wichita, KS 67206-2936


Attn: Michael O’Shaughnessy, President


 


Re:           Extension of Letter Agreement







Dear Mr. O’Shaughnessy:







Reference is made to the Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated May 13, 2014, entered into by and between Minn Shares Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and The Globe Resources Group LLC (the “Purchaser”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, the Company and the Purchaser hereby agree that as of the date hereof (the “Effective Date”), the Expiration Date (as defined in the Agreement) is hereby extended for an additional period of thirty (30) calendar days (the “Extension”).







In connection with the foregoing, the Purchaser agrees to pay the Company no later than five (5) business days following the Effective Date: (i) $15,000 for a current payable and (ii) additional legal and administrative expenses associated with the preparation of this Extension and the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission within four (4) business days following the Effective Date.







The parties acknowledge that the foregoing is for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged. In all other respects the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.


 



	 	Sincerely, 





MINN SHARES INC.









By:/s/ Richard Gilbert                     


     Richard Gilbert


     President







 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED AS OF


THE DATE WRITTEN ABOVE:







THE GLOBE RESOURCES GROUP, LLC


 


By:/s/ Michael O’Shaughnessy


     Michael O’Shaughnessy


     President