alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996             JUL-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1996             JUL-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996             OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,000,737               2,198,520
<RECEIVABLES>                                  660,357                 250,897
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         13,874,176              13,620,157
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,535,270              16,069,574
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     142,032                 128,612
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,393,238              15,940,962
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,535,270              16,069,574
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              481,653                  67,098
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           496,352                 519,356
<COMMISSIONS>                                (173,233)               (212,662)
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                   6,825                  33,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                811,597                 407,607
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   811,597                 407,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 10, 2003

                                                   /s/ Harold W. Ingalls
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Harold W. Ingalls
                                                   Vice President, Finance and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (347 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (13 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (15 KB PDF)
Flows tables (143 KB PDF)
Level tables (122 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (23 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (32 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates |
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 10, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SIERRA CLUB and §

DELAWARE AUDUBON

, §

§ No. 216 , 2015

Appellants Below

- Appellant s

, §

§ Court Below: Superior Court

v. § of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF § No . N13A

- 09

- 001 ALR and

NATURAL RESOURCES AND § No. N14A

- 05

- 002 ALR

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and §

DELAWARE CITY REFINING §

COMPANY

, LLC, §

§

Appellees Below

- Appellee s

. §

Submitted: November 4 , 2015

Decided: November 5 , 2015

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN , Justices.

O R D E R

This 5th day of November 2015, having considered this matter on the briefs filed

by the parties and after oral argument , we find it evident that the judgment of the

Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in its

March 31 , 2015 decision, which affirmed the Environmental Appeals Board’s and the

State Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board’s dismissals of a challenge to the Delaware

Department of Natural Resources and Envi ronmental Control Secretary’s grant of an air

permit amendment

. 1

1 Sierra Club v. Delaware Dep’t o f Nat. Res. & Envt l

. Control , No s . N13A

- 09

- 001 ALR &

N14A

- 05

- 002 ALR (Del. Super. Mar. 31, 2015). A sentence o n page 14 of the Superior Court’ s

opinion could be read to suggest that the State Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board predicated

its decision on exactly the same grounds as the Superior Court. Although the State Coastal Zone

### 2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is

AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice

Industrial Control Board did no t do so, the Superior Court’ s legal reasoning was correct and we

affirm its judgment on that basis.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1999 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          42,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,491
<PP&E>                                       1,554,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                 583,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,168,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,902
<BONDS>                                        625,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           312
<OTHER-SE>                                     430,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,168,134
<SALES>                                        437,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               496,735
<CGS>                                          192,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               147,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             73,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-2650-RBJ-BNB

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY as subrogee of Chet Hayes,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE INTERMOUNTAIN RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,

Defendant.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

DATED this 12th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02650-RBJ-BNB Document 2 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.3
 2008-000065G
 PHYSICAL HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT
 AGREEMENT BETWEEN
 Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration (PRHIA) ADMINISTRATION Executive Director, Domingo
Nevárez Ramírez, MHSA;
  TRIPLE-S SALUD, INC., ###-##-#### INSURER Ms. Socorro
Rivas
  For the Provision of Health Insurance
coverage to eligible population under the
Government Health Insurance Plan




---



##### 



WITNESSETH
  WHEREAS:
 WHEREAS ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION
 WHEREAS ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION
 HENCEFORTH:
 Article I:




---



##### 



ADMINISTRATION
 Article II: Article XXIX Effective Date and Term
 1.
    
    This contract shall be in effect from July 1, 2008 until December 31, 2009.2.
    
    ......3.
    
    ......
 Article III:
 Article IV: To incorporate a new Appendix D, Guidelines for the Development of Program Integrity
 Plan.
  /s/  Domingo Nevárez RamírezDomingo Nevárez Ramírez, MHSAExecutive DirectorPuerto Rico Health Insurance Administration/s/ Socorro RivasSOCORRO RIVASChief Executive OfficerTRIPLE-S SALUD INC./s/ Luis A. MariniLUIS A. MARINI, DMDChief Executive Officer
  3




---



##### 



Appendix C
 TRIPLE-S SALUD, INC./ TRIPLE C, INC.
 pmpm st
 Monthly Premiums Rates
 SSSFixed AdministrativeRegion or Area
    
    Premiums Rates
    
    Cost
    
    ProfitNorth
    
    $
    87.99
    
    
    $
    6.30
    
    
    $
    2.20Southwest
    
    $
    87.71
    
    
    $
    6.30
    
    
    $
    2.19
  4




---



##### 



APPENDIX D
 Guidelines for the
Development of
Program Integrity
Plan
 5
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 9, 2010*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.127 Finance Companies1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A1 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyPresident (Principal Executive Officer)Date:  January 19, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2303

KRISH PURSWANI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FORTUNE PERSONNEL CONSULTANTS OF COLUMBIA,

INCORPORATED; COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; FRANCIS BARRY,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JOHN YANES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-85-3-17BD)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Krish Purswani, Appellant Pro Se. Tracy Lynn Eggleston, Allan

Levin, John L. Choate, COZEN & O'CONNOR, Columbia, South Carolina;

Weldon R. Johnson, BARNES, ALFORD, STORK & JOHNSON, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his civil complaint. Appellant asserted claims of fraud, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and job discrimination based on his

race. The district court granted summary judgment on all claims and

as to all Defendants except for Appellant's breach of contract

claim against Defendant Collier Health Services, Inc. Because the

only surviving claim was based on state law and Appellant's claim

of damages failed to satisfy the jurisdictional amount, the district court remanded this claim to state court for disposition. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting

the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Purswani v. Fortune Personnel Consultants of Columbia, No. CA-95-

85-3-17BD (D.S.C. Aug. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNESTO OLIVERIO MORALES-CHO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71050

Agency No. A088-889-844

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2014** 

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Ernesto Oliverio Morales-Cho, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for

asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

JUN 16 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We review de novo questions of law and for substantial evidence factual findings. 

Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and

grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

Morales-Cho sought asylum and withholding of removal on the basis of his

membership in a particular social group.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Morales-Cho established

that he qualified for either the changed or extraordinary circumstances exception to

excuse an untimely asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4), (5); AntonioMartinez v. INS, 317 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[a]s a general rule,

ignorance of the law is no excuse”). Thus, his asylum claim fails.

With respect to Morales-Cho’s withholding of removal claim, however,

when the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case they did not have the benefit

of either this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th

Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and PirirBoc v. Holder, No. 09-73671, 2014 WL 1797657 (9th Cir. May 7, 2014), or the

BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and

Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Further, although the BIA

references nexus, we cannot affirm on this ground because the BIA incorporated

the IJ’s reasoning, and the IJ’s denial was based in part on cognizability. Thus, we

2 12-71050
remand Morales-Cho’s withholding of removal claim to determine the impact, if

any, of the foregoing decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002)

(per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.

3 12-71050
#### In re ESTATE of SELIKIN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
**Exhibit
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Reliv’ International, Inc.
        (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert
        L. Montgomery, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D.
        Albright, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
 
 /s/
                Robert L. MontgomeryRobert
                L. MontgomeryChief
                Executive OfficerDate: November 8,
                  2007
 
 /s/
                Steven D. AlbrightSteven
                D. AlbrightChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                November 8, 2007
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        and
        is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
        document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        as
        amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
        section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
        into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
        Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically
        incorporated by reference in any such filing.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1732 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1732

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ``Dr. Karl E. 
                     Carson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2007

Mr. Allard (for himself and Mr. Salazar) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ``Dr. Karl E. 
                     Carson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. KARL E. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Karl 
E. Carson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```