alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric D. Gadd, Chief Executive Officer of Zond Windsystems
Management LLC, as General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

  (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that the Report
         was not timely filed; and

  (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership for the three months ended September 30, 2003.


Date: May 10, 2004
                                  /s/ ERIC D. GADD
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Eric D. Gadd
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  Zond Windsystems Management LLC, as General
                                  Partner of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I
389 A.2d 679

#### Commonwealth v. Hancock, Appellant.

Submitted April 11, 1977.

Stephen A. Tetuan, for appellant;

Shad Connelly, Assistant District Attorney, and Robert H. Chase, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of First Reliance Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), F.R. Saunders, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey A. Paolucci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ F. R. Saunders, Jr.            
|F. R. Saunders, Jr.                
|President / Chief Executive Officer
|                                   
|/s/ Jeffrey A. Paolucci            
|Jeffrey A. Paolucci                
|Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGE 2 TO 4 OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                       302
<INVENTORY>                                     36,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,508
<PP&E>                                          62,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,567
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,360
<SALES>                                        103,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,297
<CGS>                                           86,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,536)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,356)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,180)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mary H.Cilia, Chief Financial Officer of Zond Windsystems
Management LLC, as General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that the Report was not
     timely filed; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2003.


Date:     May 10, 2004
                                  /s/ MARY H. CILIA
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Mary H. Cilia
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  Zond Windsystems Management LLC, as General
                                  Partner of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2008*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.113 Banks in U.S.-Affiliated Areas1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000766041
<NAME> CENTRAL SPRINKLER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH>                                             429
<SECURITIES>                                    14,173
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,578
<INVENTORY>                                     48,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,481
<PP&E>                                          71,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,514
<BONDS>                                         30,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,529
<SALES>                                        160,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,971
<CGS>                                          112,756
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        

</TABLE>
#### Benjamin AQUINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 46473.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1973.

*113Mark A. Schwartzman, San Antonio, for appellant.

Ted Butler, Dist. Atty., Charles Roberts, Michael Schill and Antonio G. Cantu, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

JACKSON, Commissioner.

On his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was found guilty of robbery by assault; punishment, ten (10) years.

The only question raised by appellant is the sufficiency of the evidence presented on his plea of guilty.

Appellant executed a written waiver of trial by jury, in which he informed the court of his desire to plead guilty, which waiver was approved by his attorney, the assistant criminal district attorney and the trial judge. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge, and after being duly admonished by the court, he persisted in his plea of guilty.

Appellant also executed a written waiver and consent to stipulations, in which he waived confrontation of the witnesses and the right to cross-examine them, and agreed to the introduction of written affidavits, statements of witnesses and other documentary evidence:

In such waiver signed by appellant, it is recited:

> “Said defendant in person under oath together with his counsel and the attorney representing the State of Texas further agrees and stipulates that he, the said defendant, is the identical person named in this indictment in the above styled and numbered cause and that all the acts and allegations in said indictment (Count No. 1 of said indictment) charging the offense of robbery by assault are true and correct, and that the acts therein alleged occurred in Bexar County, Texas.”

This waiver and stipulation were also signed by appellant’s attorney and acknowledged by appellant before the deputy district clerk and approved by the trial judge.

This exact form was approved by this Court in McNeese v. State, 468 S.W.2d 801.

The above waiver and stipulation was admitted in evidence, and also several San Antonio police department reports, and the affidavits of Marie Gonzales, William M. Bean and Juan Balzaldua.

Without detailing the contents of these exhibits, they amply proved the appellant’s guilt as charged.

We overrule the contention of appellant that the evidence was not sufficient, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No motion for rehearing shall be filed by the clerk except upon permission from the Court for good cause shown.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Sd s

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-po-00149-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

v.

MARK L. HALPER,

Defendant.

ORDER RE: NOTICE OF DISPOSITION/PLEA AGREEMENT

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

The Defendant, Mark L. Halper, filed a Notice of Disposition/Plea Agreement in
this matter. The Court has reviewed the Notice, and;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the foregoing, the trial currently
scheduled to commence on September 13, 2012 is VACATED and

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are to appear before the Court on
September 13, 2012 at the time of 9-00 AM for a Disposition Hearing and
Entry of Plea.

DATED: 30 [pe

BY THE. CQURT:

United State’ Magistrate Judge
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Triple-S ManagementCorporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the annual period ended December 31,2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and; 2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.         Date: March 23, 2005   By: /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas               Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas       *President and*       *Chief Executive Officer*
Exhibit 99(b)

Household Finance Corporation
HRSI Funding, Inc. II
Household Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-2


Original Class A Principal                     550,000,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                    550,000.00
Original Class B Principal                      74,050,000.00
Number of Class B Bonds (000's)                     74,050.00


Distribution Date                                                2002 Totals

CLASS A
-------
Class A Principal Distributions                                            0.00
Class A Interest                                                  27,225,000.00


CLASS B
-------
Class B Principal Distributions                                            0.00
Class B Interest                                                   1,685,442.88
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Raymond Glickman, Defendant.

County Court, Kings County,

November 7, 1956.

*Herbert I. Sorin*for defendant.

*Edward S. Silver, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

Hyman Babshay, J.

This is an application in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*to vacate and set aside a judgment of conviction dated May 24, 1954 which convicted the defendant of the crime of an attempt to violate section 1751 of the Penal Law as a felony and sentenced him to a term of not less than one nor more than three years in State prison,

This application is made upon the ground that the provisions of section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were not complied with at the time of sentence in that the defendant was not asked if he had any reason to show why judgment should not be pronounced against him. The records of the court indicate that the defendant was represented by counsel at the time of sentence (Clerk’s Minutes, Vol. 673, p. 59). The commitment contains the following statement: “Being asked and he having nothing to say why the judgment of law should not be pronounced against him, the Court pronounced judgment as follows.”

There is also an entry that the defendant was present with counsel, “ and arraigned for sentence pursuant to Code Crim. Pro. § 480.” In view of the foregoing, the court finds there is sufficient documentary evidence to rebut the defendant’s *107contention. The presumption of regularity attending the judgment of this conviction has not been rebutted *(Matter of Bojinoff*v. *People,*299 N. Y. 145; *People*v. *Richetti,*302 N. Y. 290; *People*v. *Langan,*303 N. Y. 474). The motion is denied without a hearing. Let the District Attorney enter an order to that effect and serve a copy of same with the notice of entry by mail addressed to the defendant in whatever institution he is presently confined. Submit order.
389 A.2d 205

#### Gurrentz International Corporation v. Mrs. Ressler’s Food Products Co., Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1977.

George Gershenfeld, for appellant;

Stanton Dubin, for ap-pellee.

Judgment affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

DCT Industrial Trust Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inregistration statement Nos. 333-137929 and 333-145252 on Form S-8 and registration statement Nos. 333-141910, 333-141913 and 333-145253 on Form S-3, of DCT Industrial Trust Inc. of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of DCT Industrial Trust Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of DCT Industrial Trust Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Denver, Colorado 

February 29, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS INCLUDED
HEREIN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,814
<INVENTORY>                                     65,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,660
<PP&E>                                         364,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                 150,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,027
<BONDS>                                        196,726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   515,451
<SALES>                                        195,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,418
<CGS>                                          171,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeffery C.
Swank, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jeffery C.
      SwankJeffery
      C. SwankChief
      Executive OfficerDate:  March 12,
      2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July 17, 2009                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                    |   |
|                                                    |   |
| /s/ Charles E. Leibold                                  |   |
| Charles E. Leibold                                      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer |   |
```

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the annual filing of Stock Market Solutions, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10KSB for the period ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Richard Smitten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Smitten
    Richard Smitten
    Director

March 28, 2003
```