alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ,

 a/k/a “The Big Guy,”, a/k/a “Santa Claus,”

2. ABEL SANCHEZ-LEON,

 a/k/a Joel Lopez,

 A/k/a Raul Marez-Ortiez,

3. OCTAVIO QUEZADA-PEREZ,

 a/k/a “Tavi,”

4. FLODINA BELETSO GALLEGOS,

5. GUADALUPE RUIZ-GUARDADO,

 a/k/a “Lupe,”

6. JULIO MARES-RUIZ,

 a/k/a “Mariano,”

7. LUIS JORGE MARTINEZ-VALDIVA, and

8. ROBERT MASON BYAS,

 a/k/a “Robin,”

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#430) on November 20, 2012, by Defendant Hilario Quintero-Rodriguez. The Court construes

this Notice as a motion to change his/her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the

parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for February 21, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for May 20, 2013, at 3:00 p.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for November 30, 2012, and the

December 10, 2012, trial date are VACATED as to Defendant QuinteroRodriguez.

DATED this 28th day of November, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: May 14, 2003


                                    /s/ Harold W. Ingalls
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Harold W. Ingalls
                                    Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                    Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Serologicals Corporation and
will be retained by Serologicals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al., Appellants, v. James Boadley ASHWORTH, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 1, 1973.

*55Mary Jo Arterberry, Frankfort, for appellants.

Robert D. Simmons, Allender, Simmons & Robertson, Bowling Green, for appellee.

STEINFELD, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Department of Public Safety and its Commissioner from a judgment of the circuit court that set aside the revocation of the appellee’s motor vehicle operator’s license.

Appellee Ashworth filed in the circuit court a petition for appeal from the order revoking (KRS 186.565), but he failed to have a summons issued. However, he served a copy of the petition on the Department of Public Safety. The Department moved to dismiss because of the lack of summons, but its motion was overruled. KRS 186.565 does not specifically require that a summons be issued, however CR 3 provides that “A civil action is commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of a summons * * That rule applies here. It is our opinion that the trial court erred in failing to sustain the motion to dismiss.

The judgment is reversed for the entry of a judgment consistent herewith.

PALMORE, C. J., and MILLIKEN, OSBORNE, REED, STEINFELD and STEPHENSON, JJ., sitting.

All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

# ACTION:

Notice to cancel EAC public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Election Assistance Commission has cancelled the EAC closed session meeting scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2010, 9-11 a.m. EDT. The meeting was announced in a sunshine notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 in Volume 75, Number 159.                    

# Person to Contact for Information:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Donetta Davidson,

Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-21266 Filed 8-23-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-10-026]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

August 26, 2010 at 11 a.m.

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status:

Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-468 and 731-TA-1166-1167 (Final)(Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 7, 2010.)

5. Outstanding action jackets:

(1.) Document No. GC-10-144 concerning approval of revised users' manual for Commission Mediation Program for investigations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: August 19, 2010.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 2010-21057 Filed 8-20-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### BRESLAW v. LIPSICK.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-59061, 33-78694 and 33-77341) pertaining to the Immunex
Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated on February 13, 1997,
the Immunex Corporation Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors Amended and
Restated on February 23, 1999, the Immunex Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan as
Amended and Restated on July 27, 1999 and the Immunex Corporation 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 21, 2000 (except for Note 13 as
to which the date is February 17, 2000), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Immunex Corporation included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG L.L.P.

Seattle, Washington
March 7, 2000


                                       86
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH v. SILVER.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Heritage Organization, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 (the "Report"),
I, Vickie Walker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.





/s/ Vickie Walker
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer



June 15, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 5


                       [LETTERHEAD OF CONNER & WINTERS]


                                January 12, 2001


Vintage Petroleum, Inc.
110 West Seventh Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

     Re:  Vintage Petroleum, Inc.
          Registration Statement on
              Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement")
            -----------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel for Vintage Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of the
Registration Statement relating to an aggregate of 5,268,044 shares of Common
Stock, par value $.005 per share, of the Company (the "Shares"), issuable upon
the exercise of options or pursuant to awards granted, or which may from time to
time be granted, to directors, officers and key employees of the Company or its
subsidiaries pursuant to the Vintage Petroleum, Inc. 1990 Stock Plan, as amended
(the "1990 Plan"), and the Vintage Petroleum, Inc. Non-Management Director Stock
Option Plan, as the case may be (collectively, the "Plans").

     We have examined the Registration Statement being filed contemporaneously
herewith.  We have also examined and are familiar with an original or copy, the
authenticity of which has been established to our satisfaction, of each of the
Plans and all such documents, corporate records, and other instruments as we
have deemed necessary to express the opinion herein set forth.  We understand
that the Company does not intend to grant restricted stock awards under the 1990
Plan to employees or directors who have been employed by or served the Company
or its subsidiaries for less than six months.  We have also assumed that the
consideration to be received by the Company for each of the Shares upon issuance
will equal or exceed the par value per share of Common Stock of the Company.

     Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares have been
duly authorized and, when issued and paid for in accordance with the terms of
the Plans and applicable authorized forms of agreement thereunder, will be
validly issued, fully paid, and non-assessable.
<PAGE>

Vintage Petroleum, Inc.
January 12, 2001
Page 2


     We are members of the bar of the State of Oklahoma.  Our opinion expressed
above is limited to the laws of the State of Oklahoma, the corporate law of the
State of Delaware and the federal laws of the United States of America, and we
do not express any opinion herein concerning the laws of any other jurisdiction.

     We hereby consent to the Company's filing of this opinion as an exhibit to
the Registration Statement and to the references to our firm in the Registration
Statement.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        Conner & Winters,
                                        A Professional Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report
of Central Jersey Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Anthony Giordano, III, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:  July 10, 2007                  /s/ Anthony Giordano, III
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Anthony Giordano, III
                                      Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                      Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Richard Roland, Defendant.

County Court, Saratoga County,

July 19, 1957.

*Richard Roland,*defendant in person.

*Carleton J. King, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

Richard J. Sherman, J.

This proceeding is in the nature of an application by the defendant for a writ of error *coram nobis.*

Defendant was convicted of burglary in the third degree by his plea of guilty. At that time the defendant was represented by counsel of his own choice.

The defendant, Roland, was sentenced to a term in the New York State Prison at Dannemora for a term of not less than two nor more than four years. Sentence was suspended, and defendant was placed on probation for a period of five years. At all times defendant was fully informed of his rights. Nowhere do I find that the defendant was not afforded the mantle of protection as required by law.

Subsequently, the defendant was brought before the court charged with the violation of probation. A plea of not guilty was entered in behalf of the defendant. The matter was adjourned to give the defendant an opportunity to secure counsel if he so desired. On the adjourned day, defendant appeared without counsel and pleaded guilty to the charge of violation of his probation, and the original sentence imposed.

The Appellate Division clearly stated in *People*v. *St. Louis*(3 A D 2d 883, 884):“ We find no authority, statutory or otherwise, that requires a court to inform a defendant that he has a right to counsel in connection with revocation of probation.”

Another contention raised by the defendant is that his record taken by the clerk of the court was not a sworn statement. The record indicates his record was taken, that the clerk asked him *987the usual formal questions and that the defendant did answer each of the questions so asked. This statement was not under oath, but it is not such an error as to void the conviction.

At the time of sentence, the court had before it the statistical record as well as a complete probation report.

The other questions raised by the defendant are of no moment. The application by the defendant is denied.

Submit order.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000771

14-OCT-2013

09:06 AM
#### Stephanie Dean HAMIL, Appellant-Respondent, v. James Russell HAMIL, Respondent-Appellant.

Nos. 25629, 25996 and KCD 26388.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District.

Dec. 4, 1972.

*301James D. McGrath, Kansas City, for appellant-respondent.

Lantz Welch, Kansas City, for respondent-appellant.

Before SHANGLER, C. J., PRIT-CHARD and WASSERSTROM, JJ., and PETERS, Special Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The three consolidated appeals here concern three aspects of the domestic relations of the parties, all tried to the court below. Case No. 25,629 is an appeal from a decree of divorce granted the wife with alimony and child support wherein it is contended by the husband that the wife did not adduce sufficient evidence to establish his guilt of indignities or that she was the innocent and injured party. The husband asks that the decree granted the wife be set aside and that a divorce be granted to him on his allegations and proof.

An examination of the facts in the transcript reveals that the judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous; that no error of law appears; and that an opinion in the case would have no precedential value. Therefore, the judgment in Case No. 25,629 is affirmed.

Case No. 25,996 is an appeal by the wife from 5⁄8 judgment in accounting which awarded $3,308.02 of the joint funds of the parties to the husband. The three points and authorities are entirely insufficient in that they do not set out what rulings of the court are erroneous and the reason that they are so claimed, and two of the points further amount only to abstract statements of law. Rule 84.04(d), V.A.M.R., has been disregarded. Therefore, the appeal in Case No. 25,996 is dismissed.

For like failure to comply with Rule 84.04(d) in the single point, “The trial court erred in failing to allow money judgment to wife for attorney fees and suit money,” Case No. KCD 26,388 is dismissed.

All concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.6



                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Aviation Group, Inc.
Dallas, TX 75201

We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Registration Statement of our report
dated March 31, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Global Leisure Travel, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman, LLP
Seattle, Washington
October 27, 2000
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

December 29, 2023 CR-2023-0259 Breon Dwayne Humphrey-Sallings v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Madison Circuit Court: CC-21-2601) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on December 29, 2023, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
#### SOUTH SEAS HOTEL v. ROBERTS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1877 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1877

To amend title 4, United States Code, to prescribe that members of the 
Armed Forces and veterans out of uniform may render the military salute 
             during hoisting, lowering, or passing of flag.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2007

    Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to prescribe that members of the 
Armed Forces and veterans out of uniform may render the military salute 
             during hoisting, lowering, or passing of flag.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDUCT BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS OUT OF 
              UNIFORM DURING HOISTING, LOWERING, OR PASSING OF FLAG.

    Section 9 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``all persons present'' and all that follows through the end and 
inserting ``those present in uniform should render the military salute. 
Members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in 
uniform may render the military salute. All other persons present 
should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over 
the heart, or if applicable, remove their headdress with their right 
hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. 
Citizens of other countries should stand at attention. All such conduct 
toward the flag in a moving column should be rendered at the moment the 
flag passes.''.
                                 <all>
```