alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William A. Loving, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Erin S.
Sites, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ WILLIAM A. LOVING, JR.
                                          --------------------------
                                          William A. Loving, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                          March 18, 2005
                                          --------------


                                          /s/ ERIN S. SITES
                                          -----------------
                                          Erin S. Sites
                                          Controller

                                          March 18, 2005
                                          --------------
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods
included  in  the  year  covered  by  this  annual  report,   of  WAMU  MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-AR5;

     2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information  in these  reports,  taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  servicer  under the pooling and
servicing, or similar,  agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicer
under the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement  and based  upon my
knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and
except as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its  obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The  reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating  to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting  a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:

Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
#### The State, ex rel. Strawser, a Taxpayer, *v.*Swing et al., Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County, et al.

(No. 25628

Decided September 25, 1935.)

*139
      *Mr. Sol Goodman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Louis Schneider,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Robert A. Blade, Mr. Charles P. Taft, 11, Mr. Murray Seasongood,*and *Mr. Sanford A. Headley,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Matthias and Day, JJ., not participating.
Plaintiff: MALI TOLMAN,

V.Defendant: AIR SERV CORPORATION.

Court Use Only

Case No.: 201 1-cv-5920

Division: 269

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

THIS COURT having reviewed Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default, and having been

fully advised in the premises,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend

against Plaintiffs Complaint and is in default.

DATED this 

day of September, 2011

BY THE COURT:

Clerk

I

EXHIBIT

G
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of TXP Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Michael C. Shores, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to TXP Corporation and will be retained by TXP Corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


*/s/  Michael
                      C. Shores*Michael
                      C. ShoresPresident
                      and Chief Executive Officer*(Principal
                      Executive
                      Officer)*


April
        16,
        2008
## NO. 12

- 22

- 00247

- CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

TEVARES TIMMONS , R

E

LATOR § § § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Tevares Timmons, acting pro se, file d this original p roceeding to challenge Respondent ’ s failure to comply with a mandate from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. 1 On September 22, 20 2 1, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted habeas relief in trial court cause number 114

- 80390

- 99 and ordered th at R elator ’ s agg rava ted robbery conviction is vacated. Ex parte Timmons , No. WR

- 92,604

- 02, 2021 WL 4301844, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 2 2 , 2021) (per curiam) (op., not designated for publication)

. The Court of Criminal Appeals further ordered , “ The trial court shall issue any necessary orders within ten days from the date of this Court ’ s mandate. ” Id . (emphasis added). The mandate issued on October 19, 2021. Relator asks that we issue an ord er to Respondent so the Court of Criminal Appeals ’ mandate can be fulfilled. B ut b ecause the Court of Criminal Appeals vacated Relator ’ s conviction , nothing remains for R espondent to do

. 2 Accordingly, we deny Relator ’ s petition for writ o f m andamus. Opinion delivered September 30, 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (DO NOT PUBLISH)

1 Respondent is the Honor able Austin R . Jackson, Judg e of the 114th District Court in S mith County, Texas. The State of Texas is the Real Party in Interest.

2 We also note that t he Texas Dep artment of Cr iminal Justice ’s inmate database lists three of Relator ’s convictions but does not list the vacated aggravated ro b b ery conviction

.

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COUR T OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT

SE PTEMBER 30 , 2 022
NO. 12

- 22

- 00247

- CR

TEVARES TIMMONS , Relator V.
HON. AUSTIN R. JACKSON , Respondent

O RIGINAL P RO CEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard th e petition for writ of mandamus filed by Tevares Timmons ; who is the relator in appellate cause numbe r 12

- 22

- 00247

- CR and the defendant in trial court cause number 114

- 80384

- 99 , formerly pending on the docket of th e 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on Seotember 9, 2022 , and the same havi ng been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue , it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORD ERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby denied

. By per curiam opi nion. Panel c onsisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)Date:  April 14, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
              [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                              October 5, 2000

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

901 Main Street

Dallas, Texas 75202

Cross Timbers Oil Company
810 Houston Street, Suite 2000
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
                            Re: Securities and Exchange Commission

                               Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-56983


Gentlemen:

   The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd. consents to the incorporation of its
estimated Proved Reserves, Future Net Revenues, and Present Values of Future
Net Revenues in the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Oil Company
Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-56983, and to references to our Firm in
such registration statement.

   Miller and Lents, Ltd. has no interests in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust or
Cross Timbers Oil Company or any of its affiliated companies or subsidiaries
and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no
director, officer, or employee, or otherwise, connected with Cross Timbers
Royalty Trust or Cross Timbers Oil Company. We are not employed by Cross
Timbers Royalty Trust or Cross Timbers Oil Company on a contingent basis.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

                                        /s/ James C. Pearson
                                    By ________________________________________

                                      James C. Pearson

                                      President
EXHIBIT 32

CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

We, Andrew F. Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Phillip A. Reinsch, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Capstead Mortgage Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBS                                
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Andrew F. Jacobs                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 1, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCH                              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Phillip A. Reinsch                                  
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OFTHE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OFWASHINGTON 

## ) No. 79873-1-I 

## ) Respondent, 

## ) DIVISION ONE



## ) v. 

## ) JOHN MATTHEW LAIR, 

## ) ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant.

_____________________________ 

## ) FILED: December23, 2019 PER CURIAM

—John Lairappeals the term of supervised probation imposed following his guilty pleato attempted voyeurism. He contends, and the State concedes, thatthe sentencing court lacked authorityto impose DOC supervision forattempted voyeurism. ~ RCW 9.94A.501 (1) and (6); In re Childers, 135 Wn. App. 37, 40-41, 143 P.3d 831 (2006). In its concession, the State adds that “[p]erthejudgment and sentence, the term of supervised probation should be converted to unsupervised probation.” In his reply, Lair accepts the State’s concession. Lairalso requests remission ora refund of anyfunds DOC collected from him in relation tothe unauthorized supervision. See RCW 9.94A.780. Lair is entitled to be placed in the same position he would have been in had the error in his sentence not occurred. State v. Smissaert, 103 Wn.2d 636, 638, 694 P.2d 654 (1985).No. 79873-1-1/2

We acceptthe State’s concession and remand with directions to convert the term of DOC supervised probation to unsupervised probation and to order DCC to refund anyfunds collected from Lairforsupervision intake, monthly supervision fees, or any otherfunds related to the term of unauthorized supervision. FOR THE COURT: 

## /1/1/)



# j~

# VoAV~Lv~

2
EXHIBIT 32.1



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

As an accompaniment to the Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James L. Saner Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

o    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
o    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods presented.

This certification is based on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be
made, in a good faith effort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief
executive officer serving the Company and its many constituencies.

This certification merely accompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not
be used for any purpose other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


/s/  James L. Saner, Sr.
------------------------
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00698-CR

Roni Medearis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-90487, HONORABLE JIM CORONADO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Roni Medearis seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing. However, the clerk’s record does not contain the required trial court

certification of Medearis’s right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (requiring trial court’s

certification of defendant’s right of appeal “each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other

appealable order”), (d) (requiring record to include trial court’s certification).

This appeal is therefore abated and the trial court is directed to prepare and file

its certification of Medearis’s right of appeal as required by Rule 25.2(a)(2). A supplemental

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s certification shall be filed with this Court no later than

August 26, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 34.5(c)(2).
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Filed: July 26, 2013

Abated

Do Not Publish

2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION *





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Rurban Financial Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
      A. Joyce, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.






/s/
      Kenneth A.
      Joyce*


Print
      Name: Kenneth A. Joyce


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


Date:
      November 13, 2007





*
            This
                certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and
                Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code,
                and
                shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act
                or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
                shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
                under
                the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except
                to the
                extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference
                into any
                such filing.
#### Donald SCOGGINS, Appellant, v. FISCAL COURT OF BARREN COUNTY, Ky., etc., et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 2, 1973.

Edward F. Pritchard, Jr., Frankfort, Ray B. White, White & Hughes, Bowling Green, for appellant.

Carroll M. Redford, Jr., Walter A. Baker, Glasgow, Rubin & Trautwein, Louisville, for appellees.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner CULLEN,

Affirming.*

*

 Opinion ordered n to be published.
#### Stewart *v.*Elias.

(No. 25847

Decided March 4, 1936.)

*Mr, B. P. Hughes,*for plaintiff in error,

*590
      *Mr. Frank J. Murray,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10384 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES WELDON MAY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:96-CV-6-X

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Weldon May, # 26221-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for rehearing in regard to the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion. May’s appellate brief does not address the order denying rehearing but instead challenges the calculation of his original sentence. May’s appeal is frivolous, and we dismiss it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2.No. -2- APPEAL DISMISSED .