alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 51986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20969]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Agency Information Collection Extension; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice and request for OMB review and comment; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice in the 
Federal Register of August 6, 2010 for information that will be used in 
an impact evaluation of DOE's Solar Decathlon Program. The collection 
consists of four questionnaires to collect information on the 
respondents' knowledge of solar energy and energy efficiency and on 
installations of solar-energy and energy-efficiency equipment with 
which the respondents have been personally involved. This document 
corrects information regarding the date for the submission of comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffery Dowd, Solar Decathlon 
Evaluation Lead; EE-3B, Forrestal Building; U.S. Department of Energy; 
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 20585 or at phone 202-
586-7258; fax 202-586-2176 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81ebe4e7e7afe5eef6e5c1e4e4afe5eee4afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7bdb2b1b1f9b3b8a0b397b2b2f9b3b8b2f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 6, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-19404, 
under the heading DATES, the first sentence is corrected to read: 
Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before 
October 7, 2010.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2010.
Scott Hine,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary-Business Administration (DAS-BA), 
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010-20969 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1546

___________ Vernon Smith, * * Appellant , * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Willa Dean Spath, Circuit Clerk, Lee * Eastern District of Arkansas County, Bill Lewellen, Publi c * Defender, Lee County, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 31, 1999 Filed: May 17, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Inmate Vernon Smith appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas, dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C.-2-

§ 1983 action prior to service. Smith claimed his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated when defendants deliberately delayed the correction of a clerical
error in his sentencing order. We conclude dismissal was proper because Smith’s complaint allegations show he suffered no resulting injury other than alleged emotional distress. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) (prisoners may not bring federal civil actions for mental or emotional injury without prior showing of physical injury); Knight v. Lombardi , 952 F.2d 177, 179 (8th Cir. 1991) (inmate’s procedural due process claim dismissed where inmate failed to allege or present evidence of injury flowing from alleged violation). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We deny Smith’s request for appointment of counsel. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE
901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR
EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

January 29, 2015

Hon. Sharon Mathis

District Clerk

115 W. Main St.

- Room 203
Edna, TX 77957

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00243

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 12

- 5

- 8791 Style: ROBERT LEE GONZALES v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

The judgment of the trial court was AFFIRMED by this Court on the 7 th day of August,

2014. The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an acknowledgment to the clerk of the appellate court of the receipt of the mandate. Please review the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the attached acknowledgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Jim Vollers (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Robert E. Bell (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. W. A. 'Bill' Whi te (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13

- 13

- 00243

- CR this

________ day of _________________, 201 5

. District/County Clerk,

By :____________________________
#### Wayne Kenneth ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 50111.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1975.

Keith Woodley, Comanche, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

BROWN, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted by a jury in the County Court of Hamilton County of the offense of “failing to control speed of a vehicle on a public road,” and the jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $125.00.

Section 166(a) of Article 6701d, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. provides: “No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the circumstances then existing.” Appellant was involved in an automobile accident shortly after 10:00 A.M. on the morning of June 20, 1973, on State Highway 36 about five and two-tenths miles northwest of Hamilton. On this date the maximum speed limit for automobiles on State or Federal Highways was 70 m. p.h. during daylight hours.

At the outset we are faced with a fundamentally defective complaint. After alleging the date, the complaint reads: “in the County of Hamilton and State of Texas, Wayne Kenneth Adams did then and there unlawfully fail to control speed causing accident against the peace and dignity of the State.” The complaint does not allege that appellant was operating (1) a vehicle (2) on a highway. Both of these facts are essential elements of the offense sought to be charged. Vallejo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., *408*S.W.2d 113.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Natco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Dated: July 14, 2005

                                                      /s/ Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Raj-Mohinder S. Gurm
                                      Chief Executive Officer and CFO

                                                      /s/ Stephen K. Sleigh
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Stephen K. Sleigh
                                                      Director and Controller
Order entered June 21 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00259
- CV
GLORIA VALICHKOFSKY BEY, Appellant

V. CHURCHILL PROPERTIES , LLC, AND MISTY POS EY, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 07116



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is overdue. By postcard dated May 2, 2019, we notified Marcey Poeckes, Official Court Repo rter for the 298th Judicial District Court, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s record within ten days. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and Ms. Poeckes has not corresponded

w ith the Court regard ing the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER Marcey Poeckes to file, within T EN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has bee n found not entitled to proceed without payment of

costs. We notify appellant that if we receive verification she have not requested the reporter’s record or has been found not entitled to proceed without payment of costs and has not paid foror made arra ngements to pay for the reporter’s record , we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to: Honorable Emily Tobolowsky Presiding Judge 298th Judicial Dist rict Court Marcey Poeckes Official Court Reporter 298th Judicial District Court All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2105

To prohibit the Federal funding of a State firearms ownership database.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2014

Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Moran, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Burr, 
 Mr. Cornyn, Ms. Collins, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Wicker, 
 Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Johanns) introduced the following bill; which was 
   read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Federal funding of a State firearms ownership database.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun-Owner Registration Information 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP DATABASE.

    No department or agency of the United States shall support, by 
funding or other means, the establishment or maintenance, by a State or 
political subdivision of a State, of any comprehensive or partial 
listing of firearms lawfully possessed or lawfully owned by private 
persons, or of persons who lawfully possess or own firearms, except in 
the case of firearms that have been reported to the State or political 
subdivision as lost or stolen.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,178
<SECURITIES>                                   240,927
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,863,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,901
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,467,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          368,795
<BONDS>                                      9,863,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       184,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,467,758
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (815)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Belinda Dawn Tidwell v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00298-CR

Trial court case number: 1267425

Trial court: 177th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s retained counsel filed a motion to withdraw that complied with Rule 6.5 and 

the motion was granted. Appellant was ordered to file a pro se brief or retain counsel to file a 

pro se brief by January 28, 2013. Appellant has filed a motion claiming that she is now indigent 

and requesting appointed counsel on appeal.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at 

which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s office and appellant shall be 

present in person. At the hearing, the trial court shall determine:

1) Whether appellant is now indigent, and,

a. If appellant is now indigent, enter a written order appointing counsel on appeal and 

order counsel to file a brief with this Court within 30 days of the date of the hearing, 

regardless of whether this Court has yet reinstated the appeal;

b. If appellant is not indigent, the trial court shall determine whether appellant intends to 

retain counsel, and,

i. If appellant intends to retain counsel, shall set a hearing date not later than 20 

days from the date of the initial hearing at which appellant must appear with her 

retained counsel so that the trial court may enter new counsel’s information;

ii. If appellant does not intend to retain counsel, or does not appear at the reset 

hearing with counsel, the trial court shall admonish appellant of the dangers and 

disadvantages of self-representation on the record and shall make a written and 

oral finding regarding whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently waiving 

her right to counsel.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (c), (d), (f), 26.04 (West Supp. 2012).

The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing, and the reset hearing if 

required, and file the reporter’s record with the Court no later than 40 days from the date of 
this order. Additionally, any orders or findings of the trial court made at either hearing shall be 

included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later than 40 days from the 

date of this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental 

clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court. The court 

coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties and the Clerk of 

this Court of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: Justice Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 8, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group; Genome Research Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NHGRI Twinbrook Library, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 20, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-21317 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

| (1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      15, 2010 | /s/      Richard A. Foss                   |   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date           | Richard      A. Foss                       |   |
|                | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

| March      15, 2010 | /s/      Diana S. Tone                              |   |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date           | Diana      S. Tone                                  |   |
|                | Chief      Financial Officer and Compliance Officer |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CRESCENT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, Mike McDonald, the Chief Financial Officer of Crescent Communications, Inc.,
hereby certify that Crescent Communications, Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10-QSB, for the period ending June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of Crescent Communications, Inc.



Date August 23, 2004                    /s/ Mike McDonald
                                        -----------------
                                        Mike McDonald
                                        Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William R. Maris, Vice President — Finance and Administration of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)                                      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)                                      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | November 13, 2008 |   | /s/  William R. Maris                                    |
|--------|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   |   | William  R. Maris                                        |
|   |                   |   | Vice  President – Finance & Administration |
|   |                   |   | Chief  Financial Officer                                 |
|   |                   |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting  Officer)           |

 

----